Slashdot Mirror


Pressure Is On IBM To Forgive Millions In IT Debt

coondoggie writes to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation. "The back story on this tale is that the school district owes IBM for computers ordered in the late 1980s and early 1990s. For one reason or another the computers were never used and no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware. The school district experienced hard financial times and ultimately never paid Big Blue for the computers. In 1993 the district and IBM negotiated a long-term settlement that said the school district would pay the first of four $1.25 million installments beginning in 2008. Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story."

458 comments

  1. 15 years by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They give the school 15 years and now the school wants it just forgiven? I wish I could wait 15 years on my loans.

    1. Re:15 years by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Thats only the first payment... for all we know it could be another 15 years til they make the second...

    2. Re:15 years by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish I could order so much gear that I don't even get around to using it AND get the purchase loan forgiven. This story is a case of blatant class warfare; Who care what IBM's revenue was last quarter in regards to what appears to be a school district's wild fiscal irresponsibility? IBM is not the bad guy here, the bad guy(s) are the school board who approved the budget to purchase the equipment in the first place and then totally failed to see that it was put to use.

    3. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      It sucks that elected representatives do this so often, but what's the answer for it? The people doing it know they won't be there to answer for it! Kind of like our current administration at the federal level pissing away money on Iraq while the situation there gets worse every day, and leaving it to the next administration to make the hard decisions and clean up the mess.

    4. Re:15 years by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      Except the school board isn't stuck with the bill. At least in that the individuals on the board don't have to pay it. It isn't going to affect their salary or anything in any way. The money will have to come from them cutting back on other educational expenses. So the people who are going to suffer are the kids who weren't even born when the deal was made.

    5. Re:15 years by The+Anarchist+Avenge · · Score: 4, Funny

      posting because I accidentally modded you up

      --
      Today's lucky number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right. That's the problem. Now people who elect these school boards need to make informed decisions and not allow people of questionable character in public office. But the people who lose have little to do with anyone who made any of the decisions. Since it sounds like the computers walked off, the real answer might be to get the police dept on the case to see if there's any way they can figure out who took them. The statute of limitations might have expired by now, but a few criminal charges wouldn't hurt if they do find the responsible party. This kind of shit happens all the time in school and public utility boards with poor accountability. IBM might even have a share of the blame if they sold excess equipment on a public procurement contract with no sense that it was going to be useful to the district. Based upon that there's an argument for getting IBM involved in the solution to this other than just paying them back.

    7. Re:15 years by eln · · Score: 1

      Oooh, burn!

    8. Re:15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the usual government way though? Look at how in debt the country is (or people with credit cards for that matter). The school board chose to push the problem into the future and guess what, 15 years has gone by and IBM wants paid. Yeah, the current board is going to get stuck paying this but whoever was watching the board 15 years ago allowed it to happen, IBM allowed it, and likely the county allowed it. A $5 million dollar settlement doesn't just escape everyone's eyes. They can ask for debt forgiveness. If I were IBM, I'd either collect or be damn sure that I was getting a $5 million dollar tax break.

      So, can I ask my credit card companies if I could delay and ultimately forgive my debt (without bankruptcy)?

      Jim

    9. Re:15 years by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      So, can I ask my credit card companies if I could delay and ultimately forgive my debt (without bankruptcy)?

      I once felt this way. Now I'm not so sure... A lot of people take out loans that there's no way they can practically afford. Now, I totally agree that they're stupid to do this, but I can't help thinking that punishing them for years isn't really fair to someone who made a mistake. The loan companies took advantage of their stupidity. I find it a little difficult to take the side of an organisation that takes advantage of people.

      If more personal debt was forgiven, then the loan companies would behave more responsibly. They wouldn't suffer that much. They'd just stop lending to high risk customers.

    10. Re:15 years by empaler · · Score: 1

      Then please, at least elaborate on why you disagree?

    11. Re:15 years by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen
       
      From 15 years ago are the bad guys, unless they've lost the records of who was on the board back then too.

    12. Re:15 years by nocomment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The killer part is not only was so much of the debt already 'forgiven' but that they were given a 15 year timeline to get their shit together, *and* not have interest on it. That $5M now is not worth as much as $5M in '95 dollars. I think IBM has bent over backwards to help these people. How about California pay the $5M on their behalf?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    13. Re:15 years by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The board 15 years ago was elected by the people in the District. Those people made a bad decision when they voted.

      So create a special tax district to pay the money off from the people who live in the school district (which is quite wealthy) and tell them it's because they voted the wrong board into office.

      Maybe they'll pay a little more attention to their local elections next time.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    14. Re:15 years by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Well I at least disagree because they are a school board. We're not talking about the "sins of the father" as it were, and we're certainly not putting any financial strain on any one individual when we do this.

      One of the first things that came to mind when I read this was "How the hell can a school afford 5 million?!"... Even for a largish school in one of our bigger cities (Melbourne or Sydney) that would be a hell of a hike, and not something one is liable to lose anytime soon...

      So, to summarise a vague thread, Just because the debt occured [15] years ago doesn't mean that it shouldn't be paid. The only thing I see going in the schools favour, and only in this case is that they have apparantly lost the machines and the paperwork.

      My $0.02 AU

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    15. Re:15 years by Egdiroh · · Score: 1

      Except the school board isn't stuck with the bill. At least in that the individuals on the board don't have to pay it. It isn't going to affect their salary or anything in any way. The money will have to come from them cutting back on other educational expenses. So the people who are going to suffer are the kids who weren't even born when the deal was made.
      In terms of suffering, it's IBM who has suffered. Most computer manufacturers have educational pricing that is deeply discounted, so IBM wasn't making a lot of money off those machines to begin with. And if IBM had had that money in had they probably would have done something with it more then letting it be devalued by inflation without hindrance. So IBM gave up money on the machines, gave up money in the form of postponing the debt, and losing because of a lack of interest to make up for inflation.

      The facts for the children are that their school system is better then it would be if it had paid that money before now. The expenditure was one with a limited life span anyhow, which has passed, so it's not like they are hurting a lot from not having the equipment. They haven't had their school system go further into the red to pay to keep that equipment on a maintenance contract after the point where that is a loss. So the school system is healthy for them today. And what's even better is that the timing of the re-payment was worked out so as to have minimal impact.

      Also from a completely cynical point of view, I would like to point out that it is CA state legislators involved, as opposed to locals. What intrest does that state legislation have in the interest of a regional board of ed. Well I would not be surprised if they were looking to tighten their own budget, and gee it would be nice if they could short that school district 1.25m but know that they would be ok, so that 1.25m more of pork could survive. yeah IBM should suffer so that pork might live.
    16. Re:15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is true the problem is that "high risk customers" tends to draw demographic lines that also seem to follow, race, religion, and class in general. Isn't that how HUD got started in the first place?

      There needs to be balance. Somehow we got it backwards too. If you go rack up $50,000 in credit card debts living a fast paced lifestyle and buying trendy new shit, then you sort of deserve to get burned and feel some pain, I really don't feel too badly for those folks getting screwed by credit. If you rack up $50,000 in debt because you don't have medical insurance and you get hit by a bus, that's an entirely different matter. One is a lot more likely to be foregiven though and one is now protected so that in the event that you go bankrupt, you still owe it.

      Nothing new though, the military punishes guys that have financial problems. If you're an officer, you had better pay your damn bills. Likewise, when they do background checks to give people security, it's way better to be a recreation drug user than it is to have trouble with money. At the same time we'll hire complete fuckups to run out schools.

    17. Re:15 years by orcrist · · Score: 1
      In response to this:

      So the people who are going to suffer are the kids who weren't even born when the deal was made.

      You said this:

      In terms of suffering, it's IBM who has suffered.

      I can actually imagine how the negative effects on the education and academic environment of the kids in a school district with a large debt can be referred to as "suffering".

      I am trying to wrap my mind around the idea of a fucking thing (that's what IBM is, a thing) suffering by any definition of the word which is comparable. This is just sad on so many levels.
      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    18. Re:15 years by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story.

      Also, I noticed the state got their money before asking IBM to forgive its debts. Why doesn't IBM ask the state to give their money back as well?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    19. Re:15 years by fwarren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is the taxpayers fault, and they DESERVE to pay for it. Either by higher taxes or crummier education for their kids.

      They had a inept, corrupt school system. 5 Million in computers go poof! Is their outrage? Who's head ended up on the block? Who had to pay for this? So far no one. IBM has been nice, and has made a 15 year 5 million dollar interest free loan.

      People 15 and 20 years ago were responsible for this. The city, the school board, the voters and tax payers. They did not pay the piper....It has been put off till now. It is time to pay.

      If the city had taken out loans, were improving the school district, etc. Then there was some big natural disaster, something beyond their control. I could see IBM feeling generous and forgiving the debt. But this is due to the school districts own stupidity.

      If a car lot (yes another car analogy), sold you a car for $30,000.00, you have a million dollar home for collateral. Your worthless brother in law runs off with the car. You are having cash flow issues, and can't really afford to make the payments. Why should the car lot forgive you this loan?

      They entered into a business deal with a party who had the ability to pay. Just the party mismanaged things and has the sob story, why should IBM have to eat it? Because "they can afford it" just does not cut it. IBM could also afford to cash out, take the money and run. To not sell hardware to anybody any more. But no, they are staying in business to do business. They are not extorting their customers. They should not have to eat it. Let the tax payers who allow such government pay for it.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    20. Re:15 years by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ibm might be to blame? in what universe does a company look at a sale and question whether the customer needs the items? for that matter it is highly unlikely that IBM had a detailed enough understanding of the school disctrict to know what they would need anyways.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    21. Re:15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was reading your post and trying to figure out your point of view and how you could possibly think that way...and then I read your .sig.

      Then it all made sense. I just wish all idiots wore warning signs in public; it's really very helpful.

    22. Re:15 years by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I am trying to wrap my mind around the idea of a fucking thing (that's what IBM is, a thing) suffering by any definition of the word which is comparable. This is just sad on so many levels.

      IBM is just a name for a bunch of shareholders pooling their resources, e.g. investment from pension plans and the like. Since they've effectively lost millions of dollars, you can bet they suffered. And legally, IBM is a person.

      In fact discrimination against Corporate Americans like IBM, Microsoft and Starbucks now reminds me of discrimination against African Americans pre civil rights. The rhetoric is remarkably similar. I'm sure I could find quotes from the KKK and various Southern bigots calling African Americans 'fucking things' too. And just like African Americans they are denied the right to vote or hold public office but are still forced to pay taxes. They are even frequently attacked by anti globalisation organisations when they campaign for their civil rights, in a manner strikingly reminiscent of the KKK's vicious war against voter registration.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    23. Re:15 years by vaporland · · Score: 1

      just wait 7 years - debt older than 7 years is not collectible in court - unless owed to the IRS or college loans

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    24. Re:15 years by Fission86 · · Score: 1

      I hate to burst your bubble like this but according to my 3 friends that are over in Iraq right now, things are NOT getting worse, if anything they're getting better. Next time you form an opinion, ask someone who really knows what they're talking about, don't just get your information from some shitty ass 24/7 news channel. And in the future remember that those same shitty ass 24/7 news stations ARE trying to make a buck, add to that the fact that they are not sanctioned by any moral (or legal [I know false reporting is a crime, but who's really going to check them?]) ramifications, thus they purposefully blow things out of proportion.

      --
      Coming to you live from another dimension.
    25. Re:15 years by Country_hacker · · Score: 1

      Sweet, so you mean I don't have to pay 23 years of my 30 year mortgage?

      Sorry, I guess I don't believe you.

      --
      Never give any object more potential energy than you want it to have.
    26. Re:15 years by vaporland · · Score: 1

      by law, any debt more than 7 years old cannot be sued for in court. you still owe it, they still trash your credit, but they cannot initiate collection (garnishment, etc) after seven years... the trick is hiding for seven years so they cannot find you . . .

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    27. Re:15 years by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, nobody will notice this your little comment.

      IBM was nice enough to wait for the district to repay the state first. Why couldn't the state forgive some of the lone they made?

      And the district's used to repaying money on a regular basis for earlier, idiotic loans. Five more years isn't gonna hurt all that much.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    28. Re:15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, I don't think they'll be able to hide the school board.

    29. Re:15 years by ktappe · · Score: 1

      people who elect these school boards need to make informed decisions and not allow people of questionable character in public office.
      What color is the sky in your world?
      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    30. Re:15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise, when they do background checks to give people security, it's way better to be a recreation drug user than it is to have trouble with money.

      While it is true that you better have your finances in check, don't think that recreational drug use is a lesser offense. Both can lead to problems with obtaining a clearance. If you are having problems financially, especially living outside your means, you have a trigger for bribery. If you have drug issues you are more likely to have trust as well as financial issues and would be trigger for bribery.

      Jim

    31. Re:15 years by murderaliberal · · Score: 0

      Thats funny. Which School board. Just cause the people have changed don't mean squat. They owe it and agreed to pay it. Now its time to pay and they go crying to mother polesi.(stupid ho)I'm sure people have changed at IBM too. Who cares. Someone owed me 5 mil, I'd want it. My charitable donation just got flushed down the toliet, sorry. But I'll try to work up another fer ya. In the mean time, SEND PAYMENT NOW. Charitable donation, ha. Oh sorry bout that, we're a bunch of idiots out here, if you dismiss our bill, we'll send you a queer coffee mug. wink wink

      --
      sig
  2. Do you mean Contra Costa? by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    coondoggie writes: to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation.

    Do you mean Contra Costa?

    How do you lose that much computer equipment? It must have walked off.

    1. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      More likely the delivery was received by the staff, and then immediately returned.

      The office I worked in as a intern had the exact same problem. They made out an order for 50 IBM PC's for a training room. Instead, they received 50 IBM PS/2's that came
      in huge palette sized boxes of 25 each. These had to be dismantled inside the container before we could take them out. As soon as our boss found out what they were, they were immediately returned.

      This article seems to suggest a similar thing happened.

      Nobody seems to know how many or what type of computers Marks ordered, or even whether they ended up being used. Several former district officials called them "obsolete" and "useless."

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      If IBM delivered the goods as per the order then no matter what the management say the invoice is outstanding.

      I can see some school board in the near future saying "OMG we bought 250 HD-DVD decks but they are turning out to be obsolete and useless."

      Tough, you made the order; we delivered; pay up.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Well, at about $5000 per workstation, that would be about 1,000 computers to lose. That much hardware doesn't simply 'walk.' Plus the paperwork doesn't just disappear, ever!

      Who wants to bet the obsolete equipment was delivered straight to a landfill, and the money split threeway between the IBM higherups, the police/mafia, and the legislature (plus a little something to keep the schoolboard and the auditors happy)?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    4. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Contra Costa?

      Nah, I think they mean the Cosa Nostra.

      "Yeah, we'd appreciate it very much if you'd forget about that little debt we owe you for those computers that ... disappeared."

    5. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If the hardware was returned, then what? They have to pay for hardware that the school no longer possesses?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Contra Costa?


      Even TFA seems badly confused, referring to the school district first as "the Contra Costa school district" and, in the next sentence, as "the West Contra Cost School District". TFA also is similary inconsistent in referring to the story in the Contra Costa Times from which TFA is apparently derived sometimes as a "Contra Cost Times story" and sometimes as a "Contra Costa story".

      coondoggie seems to be just following TFA's "randomly dropping words out of proper names doesn't matter" philosophy when he alters the school district's name to "the Costa school district" in the summary.

    7. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The items may not have been returnable unless defective. Even if returned, there could have been a handling charge for the returns. At a minimum, a RMA would have been setup to handle the return. You can't just return items without working with the vendor.

      Jim

    8. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The items may not have been returnable unless defective. Even if returned, there could have been a handling charge for the returns. At a minimum, a RMA would have been setup to handle the return. You can't just return items without working with the vendor.

      Actually, under federal law, all you really need to do is write "Delivery rejected" on the outside of the unopened box.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      More likely the delivery was received by the staff, and then immediately returned.


      Whether or not anyone can find the equipment or the documentation of the original order and delivery now, presumably the time to raise any question of the validity of the underlying debt was at the time of the discussions which led to the 1993 "long-term settlement", not 15 years later.
    10. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardware was expensive back then, but 5 millions should still have got you a ton of it. The fact that they don't know where it went smells like serious corruption to me. I'd say find out where it went and make the people who actually got it pay for it.

    11. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by HardCase · · Score: 1

      If you're making that bet, I'll take a piece of it - naw, I'll take all of it. You're nuts.

    12. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by empaler · · Score: 1

      If the hardware was returned, then what? They have to pay for hardware that the school no longer possesses? If they don't have any evidence of returning the hardware, why should they be believed? IBM has a signed piece of paper saying they delivered.
      If the school had papers saying that they'd sent it back, the monkey would be back on IBM's shoulder. However, the school does not indicate that this is the case. Instead, they plead incompetence.
    13. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Who wants to bet the obsolete equipment was delivered straight to a landfill, and the money split threeway between the IBM higherups, the police/mafia, and the legislature (plus a little something to keep the schoolboard and the auditors happy)? There clearly was no money to split. There still isn't.
    14. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      OH! I'm being autistic again. I saw "no one" as including IBM. If IBM has such proof, then they deserve their money.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I plan to use the same payment method for my iPhone.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    16. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      That has to be done at time of delivery. You can't accept the shipment, wait a few months, then decide you don't want it.

    17. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      From this article it appears there was a real battle over the useability of the systems, and the district
      did try and get the machines sent back.

      Former school board member Frank Calton said he remembers the deal with IBM being touted by Marks as a mutually beneficial partnership.

      "This was submitted to us as kind of a joint venture where IBM could showcase computers as learning tools for students," Calton said. "It was supposed to have a PR angle for IBM."

      When asked by the Times last week, the district could not track down invoices for the purchases, so it is unclear how many and what type of computers were ordered. But administrators agree the computers already were outdated when the district got them.

      "I think they were out of date before (Marks) even decided to buy them," Basalto said. "Every one of them was obsolete; they were absolutely useless."

      Where the computers ended up also is a mystery. Basalto recalls that some were installed in schools, but some sat in warehouses, possibly never turned on.

      The district tried to return some of the computers, said Ruth Vedovelli, West Contra Costa school district's current finance chief. IBM refused to take them back, leading to a years-long fight that also included battles over the actual cost.

      Negotiations often got ugly, with Fred Stewart, the state trustee appointed to oversee the district's finances after it went into debt in 1990, often getting into shouting matches with IBM representatives, says Herb Cole, Marks' successor.

      "He said, 'We can't pay you, so if you want them, come and get them,'" Cole said, adding that Stewart threatened to put the computers on the curb. "He was tough as nails with them at the time."

      Stewart, who recently retired as the state trustee, declined to comment.

      In late 1993 -- four years after the district agreed to buy the computers -- the parties reached a settlement that called for deferring the first major payment until 2008. That was the year the district, under its previous loan structure, was scheduled to be finished paying back $28.5 million it owed the state.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    18. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      No money? About 20 years ago somebody stole $5 million, and today either the school district or IBM will have to pay it back.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    19. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Contra Costa?
      No. He should have said West Contra Costa School District. This used to be the Richmond School District. You lock your doors here when driving through on the freeway at speed.
      --
      Notmysig
    20. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by quarmar · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that this was part of some "laptop for every student" initiative. The laptops probably got sold under the table when the initiative got dropped.

    21. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      IBM is owed that money. They don't have to "pay it back".

      In any case, I'm not surprised 1993 computers aren't around, even in a store room anymore. After they became obsolete, dumping them at a garage sale for 50 cents each, or sending them to a landfill was probably one of the few fiscally responsible things the school district did. It could indeed have been worse, with, say, some official deciding it would be a good idea to put them in storage for $400,000 a year for the last eleven years.

      Look at yourself in the mirror, and say to yourself, "a school official might have thought it a good idea to put obsolete computers in storage for $400,000 a year" and try to laugh. You cannot, because you know it's something some idiot might actually do.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    22. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. The money is missing is the bottom line here. Either the school district pays it back, and loses $5M, or IBM 'forgives' the loan, and loses $5M.

      So at some point, someone got away with misappropriating $5M.

      Yeah, the bureaucrats aren't always the best stewards of the taxpayer monies. Yet what happened here isn't waste or inefficiency, but theft!

      The inefficient bureaucracies are actually pretty good at keeping an exhaustive paper trail for every paperclip, let alone millions in hardware. The fact that this paperwork is missing suggests some foul play.

  3. Excuses, escuses by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware Uh, the dog ate it?

    signed,
    Epstein's Mom
    1. Re:Excuses, escuses by brogdon · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is no laughing matter, man. $5 Million bought a hell of a lot of 286's back then. Do you have any idea the size of the Wing Commander lan-party the children are missing out on right now?

      Shameful.

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
    2. Re:Excuses, escuses by zotz · · Score: 1

      Jaun, you need to stop faking my name on documents.

      signed,
      Epstein's Mother

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    3. Re:Excuses, escuses by wizzard2k · · Score: 1

      "Back then" it was Oregon Trail. One of the few memories I have of third grade at one of the elementary schools (in the former Richmond Unified School District) right before they went bankrupt and we missed a month of school was playing Oregon Trail in the computer lab. Now, I don't recall if these computers were brand new at the time, but we did have to flip the disk over!

      Fortunately, my parents saw the mess and moved to the other side of the county a year later, and it was a completely different world.

  4. Re:Break their thumbs by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No multi-billion dollar corporation left behind.

  5. Bad Records by fozzmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And obsoleted computers does not mean they should be let off their debt. I reckon I may leave everything I owe for 27 years or so then claim that.

    Seriously instead of saying "let us off" they should be saying "here's your money, _please_ don't charge us interest or take us to court".

    1. Re:Bad Records by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I assure you, 27 years is well beyond your state's statute of limitations.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    2. Re:Bad Records by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Seriously instead of saying "let us off" they should be saying "here's your money, _please_ don't charge us interest or take us to court".


      Since they already entered into an agreement in which the payments were deferred and there is no interest, there is no reason to beg for what has already been given. OTOH, asking to be let off completely can't hurt.
    3. Re:Bad Records by caseih · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not clear that the computers were ever delivered. No trace of paper work or the computers themselves can be found. Does IBM have actual delivery paperwork to prove the goods were actually delivered? Guess I'll go read the FA and find out.

  6. Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politicians putting pressure on hardware supplier to write off legitimate debt.

    Are they linking to future contracts with the state?

    "But Governator, you said you'd pay!"

    "I lied"

  7. Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by shawnmchorse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They agree to defer payments for 15 YEARS, and now that they're finally at the time they might have to actually start paying something they want to just pressure them to make it go away entirely? Yow.

    1. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dont kid yourself IBM will love this. They will write off the 5 mill on condition that they get the next big IT contract California signs. Then they will cream the 'we are so generous PR' and make even more money off the fat contract.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
      Dont kid yourself IBM will love this. They will write off the 5 mill on condition that they get the next big IT contract California signs.

      What's the point in getting the contract if the lawmakers know that they can bully IBM and get away with not paying.

      And as far as the write off is concerned, take the corp tax rate multiplied times the 5 million, and that'll be the net affect on IBM's bottom line. So it's only a fraction of the 5 million.

      --
      I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    3. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not only has IBM given them 15 years to sort out their financial situation, they even decided to not charge interest. From TFA:

      A letter from IBM Chief Financial Officer Mark Loughridge to district Superintendent Bruce Harter called the repayment plan "generous" on the part of IBM because the company is not charging interest.
      So they have already decided to allow a 15-year grace period and no interest. Given the time-value of money, I'm guessing that even as-is, IBM has de facto given them the computers at below cost. They've no doubt lost money on the deal, and have been extremely generous already.

      To me this seems like gross mismanagement of funds on the part of the school board. And, frankly, forgiving their debt will not compel them to manage their funds any better in the future.
    4. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      What's the point in getting the contract if the lawmakers know that they can bully IBM and get away with not paying.
      It will probably be worth in the 10's of millions, IBM will have it set in stone and their massive legal team keeping an eye on it. Plus it will save them millions they would normally have to spend on tender.

      Its all part of give and take. The lawmakers will not be bullying IBM, they will be doing it cover their own asses. Do you think they want to expain how they lost $5 millions dollars of taxpayers money in court? IBM hold all the cards here.
      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    5. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      I bet the next time they will demand the payments be made in advance of the work being performed or the goods being delivered.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    6. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      And, frankly, forgiving their debt will not compel them to manage their funds any better in the future.

      On the contrary, it'll just encourage them to do the same thing in the future.

      The only time anything changes in the U.S. is during or immediately after a major bloodletting. If you want stuff to change, heads have to roll. Sometimes figuratively (incarceration, financial ruination, humiliation), sometimes more literally. The town/city needs to be forced to pay this, they need to blow their budget, they need to go to the teacher's unions and beg for concessions and pay cuts (which is politically suicide, teachers unions are fairly powerful). Hopefully, they'll go find the asshats that mishandled the money 15 years ago and drag them out for a good, well-deserved media-flogging.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by sampson7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 15 years was not entirely voluntary. The corrupt management of Walter Marks, the Superintendant at the time, drove the District into bankruptcy. As part of the debt restructering, IBM like every other creditor had to step aside and wait its turn.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Contra_Costa_Uni fied_School_District

      In 1990, the District was over $40 million in debt. Currently, they are still $7 million behind, not including the IBM debts. Make no mistake, they are trying to pay their debts, but they still have a long way to go.

    8. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I would be VERY surprised if IBM didn't write this off years ago anyway.

    9. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a former student of the Richmond Unified School District, which after a misappropriation scandal and a consequent bankruptcy, became the West Contra Costa Unified School District. The district, while newly named, continues to be plagued by financial misdeeds committed over 15 years ago. The suggestion in this thread to call for the teacher's union to concede pay cuts was actually mandated by the state in 1991, in order for the district to receive a $29MM loan. Teachers have not received cost of living increases commensurate with their colleagues in other unions since. Bear in mind, the RUSD, and subsequently, the WCCUSD, contain schools in some of the most violent and impoverished cities in California. Richmond is consistently in the top 20 most violent cities per capita in the US. It's hard enough to attract teaching talent to some of these schools, regardless of the fact that they're relatively underpaid.

      When it comes down to the asshattery of the administration of the time..there's a lot to go around. The superintendent, Walter Marks, took whatever funds he could to further a pet project called open schooling, which may have been one of the forebearers of the proposed voucher schemes. The different campuses were given specific lines of study, and students were given the choice to go to the school that interested them the most. For example, Pinole Valley HS was given the Dramatic Arts line, while at the same time, all musical and arts classes were cut dramatically at other schools across the district. El Cerrito HS, if I remember right, was given Math & Sciences, while those same courses were underfunded at other schools. Parents could simply not afford to send their children to schools that weren't local, helping to foment serious student disenfranchisement and furthering dropout rates.

      The asshattery continued in the state assembly, where Sup. Marks was given high praise by the Secretary of Education, William Bennett. Secretary Bennett felt that this disjointed and disenfranchising method of splitting the district was a model for urban school reform. Sup. Marks was given high praise nationwide for bankrupting the district. Marks was able to find a higher paying job in Kansas City after being fired at the height of the scandal.

      All that being said, I still think that the district should pay the debt. The question is, where will the money come from? Can't get them from the teachers, or you won't have any teachers. Can't get an appropriate amount from property taxes, due to proposition 103. There's simply not enough cirriculum to cut back. I wish there was an easy answer that didn't affect students adversely, but I simply don't believe there is.

    10. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not to mention why they waited 15 years:

      Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan


      The STATE just finished making the district repay loans for 15 years. So, when the government is owned money you better pay up, but when IBM is owed money the state turns around and recommends forgiveness?
    11. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      So they have already decided to allow a 15-year grace period and no interest. Given the time-value of money, I'm guessing that even as-is, IBM has de facto given them the computers at below cost. They've no doubt lost money on the deal, and have been extremely generous already.
      Very true - according to the Fed's Inflation Calculator, the $5M owed in 1992 (15 years ago) would be equivalent to $7,410,869.57. That's nearly 150% of the original amount ($7.5M would be 150% even.) So that's quite a bargain. And that's just to get them even. Usually loans are charged as inflation plus so that it is more than merely being even.

      So, for the $5M in 2007 dollars (using the same inflation calculator), IBM is really getting $3,373,423.29 1992 dollars - a savings for the district of $1,626,576.71 1992 dollars.

      To be really accurate you'd have to wait until each of the years in the contract passed to calculate how much IBM really lost out. It's likely a few hundred grand more than the above calculations. We just can't know until we can compute the difference by inflation, which could probably be approximated at about 1.5% to 3% per year going forward.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    12. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      California allows local sales taxes. Such taxes could be imposed or raised in CC county. Or they could cut expenses by firing administrators and special ed teachers. End all extracurricular activities.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    13. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      California allows local sales taxes.


      California doesn't allow school districts to impose them.

      Such taxes could be imposed or raised in CC county.


      Contra Costa County isn't involved in this. The West Contra Costa Unified School District is a separate legal entity that represents a small (compared to the whole county), politically weak section of the county.

      Or they could cut expenses by firing administrators and special ed teachers.


      Special ed teachers are required to meet outside mandates; they've already had cost controls, management cutbacks, and faculty wage reductions initially and subseqent freezes imposed as part of the terms of the state emergency loan.
  8. I really hate these type of arguments... by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees,the lawmakers wrote."

    Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

    Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?

    Or what about your investments?

    Or some of your other constituents - many who are retired and are relying on IBM making an actual profit in order to make money on their retirement investments.

    Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for.

    Mental note: Do not give credit to the CA schools - cash only.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?
       
      60.6% of IBM stock is held by institutions such as pension funds according to their latest report.

    2. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?

      Heh, knowing how some government pension funds are being run (San Diego), I wouldn't be surprised if the State of California has a big stake in some hedge fund that's short-selling IBM.

    3. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

      The mood certainly wasn't as forgiving of the affected party when Slashdork ran that piece the other day about the Indian ISVs pirating Windows because, well, it was just too darn expensive.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    4. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said, except the thing about the rich, fat white dudes. As a young, poor, skinny white dude who hopes to one day be an old, rich, fat white dude, I have plenty of pity for those people getting ripped off by stupidass school bureaucrats who blatantly wasted taxpayer money on computers they evidently didn't need (since they never used them, and can't even find them).

      This is 100% the fault of the school district administrators, 0% the fault of IBM, and if there are any fit rich white men losing money on it, then I have full pity for them.

      IBM is correct when it says they are generous to allow a debt from the 80s to be paid twenty years later with no interest. In that time, IBM could have turned that five million into fifty million.

    5. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for.

      It's 0.023% of their revenue. I'm sure a lot of them would be quite okay with it if they were told that their $50000 investment has gone down by $11 in order to help schools.

    6. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
      I agree with everything you said, except the thing about the rich, fat white dudes. As a young, poor, skinny white dude who hopes to one day be an old, rich, fat white dude,...

      Sorry. I was trying to point out that there's this two faced attitude in the US. We all want to be rich, but when some big, rich and powerful corporation actually wants to get paid or makes a profit (Oil companies), then they're evil and it's a "sin" to have money and make money. On the other hand, if the computer company was owned by some minority group, you can bet that those lawmakers would be singing a different tune.

      --
      I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    7. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Radres · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but by the same logic, shouldn't IBM be giving $5 million in free computers to all school districts? What makes the residents of Contra Costa, CA so special?

    8. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed that story, but I don't think it is ok to rip off IBM or Microsoft, or Apple, or anyone really.

      I don't even like to rip off the music industry. If I want it enough I will buy it. If I don't I will do without. There is plenty of genuine free stuff around anyway. Same goes for software.

      Unfortunately I have yet to find free beer.

    9. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

      I never wanted to be rich- I just want to be left the hell alone. The way I see it, we don't need the "International" corporations of the world. And that includes IBM.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees,the lawmakers wrote."

      Apparently their schools also do not have the ability to hire competent people to manage their funds.

    11. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

      To be fair, if IBM forces them to pay up, it won't be the lawmakers that will suffer directly, but rather the students who were most likely not even born when this event happened. The officials involved for the loss are probably not even still in office.

      Either way... I'm thinking these kids aren't going to get new desks and text books any time soon and will most likley look like a scene from Invader Zim when they had to have that fund raiser.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    12. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      ...our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees,the lawmakers wrote." Well, what's that thing where they take money from people in the district and send them to jail if they don't comply? The oldest racket in the book? C'mon, someone help me out here...
      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    13. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      I don't recall them consulting you as to whether or not they should exist. It's not your time or your money, and it's not your concern.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    14. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Microsoft still has possession of Windows. IBM is out actual hardware. You know, real actual tangible property, not "intellectual property".

    15. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      When they steal business from local businesses and stores, it definately affects my community and most certainly IS my business.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I never wanted to be rich- I just want to be left the hell alone.

      Sounds like something the peasants in Russia or China would have said while their governments were starving them to death.

      Are you sure you're a Marxist?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by danielk1982 · · Score: 1

      >I never wanted to be rich- I just want to be left the hell alone. The way I see it, we don't need the "International" corporations of the world. And that includes IBM.

      How many components of the PC you wrote this drivel on, do you think were designed and created by "International" corporations? Last I checked, Slashdot wasn't a non-profit charity either. It looks to me like you're the one who won't leave corporations alone. After all you went through all the effort of buying the hardware, the software, the internet access and then typing in the domain name to get here.

    18. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      So your local businesses and stores have some kind of right to your business? And for that, you support government coercion to stomp on the corporations' ability to contract with whom they please?

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    19. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, we don't need the "International" corporations of the world.
      Damned straight, brotha'. Let's abolish all "international" corporations.
      We can start with the Red Cross..
      and Greenpeace..
      and the United Nations..
      and those horrible airlines that have the nerve to have employees in every country where they land..
      And the "international brotherhood" known as the Teamsters union.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    20. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      How dare he post an opinion on this story that conflicts with another Slashdotter's opinion on another story? Doesn't he realise we all have to agree on everything in order for society to survive?

    21. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So your local businesses and stores have some kind of right to your business?

      Yes. As my friends and neighbors, they should get preferential treatment. In addition to that, they favor me with their business in return. That's called having a local economy.

      And for that, you support government coercion to stomp on the corporations' ability to contract with whom they please?

      Yes. Especially when they attempt to use profits from one region to put local businesses in another region out of business.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    22. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You can read Marx in two ways- the Communist Manifesto or The Theory of Capital. The second has much to say about how concentration of wealth and freedom are not compatible.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because software piracy is wildly different from defaulting on your legitimate debt. Software piracy does no tangible harm to the aggrieved party, only in the nebulous concept of "lost sales". (I say this as someone who makes his living by selling software, mind you.) Whereas in this case of IBM, IBM gave this school district millions of dollars in equipment with a written contract stipulating repayment, which now they may not get. It's a totally different situation.

    24. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, all of the above were merely reactions to what the multinationals were doing already. Nuke the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, and Switzerland and you'd wipe most of them out.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    25. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      You are comparing Oranges and Sherman Tanks. IBM delivered REAL hardware that costs real money to make and Microsoft delivered, um, exactly nothing. IBM lost real money. Microsoft MAY have lost out on some profit, if the buyer would have purchased windows anyways. That's why software "piracy" isn't theft, it's copyright infringement.

    26. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      how concentration of wealth and freedom are not compatible.

      Yes, that's one of many things that Marx got wrong. He failed to realize that wealth is a consequence of freedom.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    27. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's one of many things that Marx got wrong. He failed to realize that wealth is a consequence of freedom.

      Only if you include the freedom to do evil in your concept of freedom. I don't. Your freedom ends where the next guy's begins. Thus concentration of wealth, which is *always* due to becoming a parasite on the system and thus is supported by unpaid wages or unfair pricing (usually both), is not freedom. It's enslaving your fellow citizens.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    28. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Only assuming "wealth" is a finite resource.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    29. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't. Why the hell should my investment go down even 1 cent to help a clearly mismanaged and corrupt school district survive? Solve the corruption problem and maybe we'll talk, but until then, all you're doing is hurting the school district by keeping the people responsible for it's failure from paying the price.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    30. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Only assuming "wealth" is a finite resource.

      Just because a resource is very big does not mean that it is infinite. There are only a fixed number of qubits in the universe that are accessible to mankind, therefore of course "wealth" is a finite resource, and it's stupid to argue that it is infinite merely because you've redefined wealth as a fiat currency.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    31. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Yes. As my friends and neighbors, they should get preferential treatment. In addition to that, they favor me with their business in return. That's called having a local economy.


      So provide them with your business. What everyone else does with their business though, is none of your concern.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    32. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 2
      It doesn't really matter if you enclose it in quotes. Under current copyright law software is no different than hardware or apples or nail clippers. It's still considered a tangible good that is purchased and sold (or licensed).

      Of course that's an unpopular POV around here, but wishes and reality are two very different things. Who knows, maybe one day that will change. But until then, a thousand slashbots patting each other in the back with "gee, wouldn't it be great if..." theories make absolutely no difference whatsoever.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    33. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Oooooh, internet tough guys. Always good for a chuckle.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    34. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Under current copyright law software is no different than hardware or apples or nail clippers

      Actually not. There are plenty of interests trying to change it to your way, but "infringing" is not the same as "theft" right now, and hopefully it will stay that way.

      Theft denies you the right to the item, infringement doesn't.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    35. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      The United Nations was formed to regulate business? That's news to them!

      Also, advocating the slaughter of millions of human beings to support your worldview certainly illustrates what kind of worldview you hold.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    36. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 1

      I never mentioned "theft", and I don't believe this case with the IBM hardware is theft, either.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    37. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Under current copyright law software is no different than hardware or apples or nail clippers. It's still considered a tangible good that is purchased and sold (or licensed). I'm sorry, but this just isn't true. Physical property is private ownership of an object; intellectual property is the right to control copying, distribution or use of an otherwise public piece of art or information. Physical property violations (like stealing) are usually crimes; intellectual property violations (like copyright infringement) usually aren't: they're torts. There are no exceptions to physical property laws for research and educational uses. And as much as Mark Helprin might want it to last forever, intellectual property is usually ceded completely to the public after some (theoretically) limited amount of time.

      It should also be clear that illegally using software you haven't paid for (and can't afford, or otherwise weren't going to buy) is different from stealing (or refusing to pay for) hardware. In particular, because the marginal cost of a pirated copy of software is essentially zero, "stealing" software you weren't going to buy is very nearly Pareto optimal. Hardware theft is not. That is, if I pirate Windows, and wouldn't have bought it, then I gain something and Microsoft loses nothing (though it is possible that Microsoft's competitors have lost a sale). If I steal a computer, whomever I stole it from is out a computer. If they're a vendor, they're out the revenue they'd get from selling it: since I stole it, they can't sell it to someone else.

      I'm not saying here that copyright infringement should be legal, just that it's very different from theft, both legally and ethically.
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    38. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1


      concentration of wealth, which is *always* due to becoming a parasite

      What utter nonsense. Concentration of wealth in a free market is a result of finding out what your customers want, and supplying it. There's a vast difference between a billionaire entrepreneur like Steve Jobs, and billionaire kleptocrat like Castro.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    39. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Like other marxists, you completely ignore the effects of productive effort. If you raise a crop, build a house, paint a picture, or any of the other activities that people do for a living, you create wealth that did not exist before.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    40. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You're new around here so let me give you a nickle's worth of free advice: don't feed the trolls.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    41. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Thus concentration of wealth, which is *always* due to becoming a parasite on the system

      Sorry, but no it isn't. Consider the Wilt Chamberlain paradox. First, everything is spread evenly among everybody. This gives everyone say $10,000 to with as they please. Now consider a million people want spend a dollar to watch Wilt Chamberlain play basketball. Mr Chamberlain now has a million dollars, and all the people that paid him the money are only short a buck. An amount they probably could have lost in thier sofa cushions. What if Wilt then decides to build a place for his fans to sit comfortably while he plays? A stadium of sorts. Now the contractors he hires to build the statium have more money than thier fellow citizens. This attracts more fans, and Wilt is even richer than before. But no-one is out more than a handfull of dollars, and Wilt is the richest person on the planet. The point being, that there is a concentration of wealth with no exploitation. No parasitic behavior. No enslaving your fellow man. Wilt just wanted to play basketball, the others saw a value in that and chipped in some money. The ones that didn't care, didn't give any money.

      Also, economics isn't a zero sum game. For instance we can turn worthess dirt into valuable bricks or earthenware. Combine the non zero sum with that Wilt Chamberlain thing and we can be free, and have rich people.

      I'm not saying that exploitation doesn't happen, but the getting rich doesn't necessarily mean robbing the poor.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    42. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Dude, which is why is should be totally illegal for anyone to buy from, or sell from any other city. It should be illegal to leave the city you are born, because you could buy and sell while you are gone! Only when we are living in tiny economicly isolated enclaves like people did in the 1600, can our economy survive!

    43. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Azure+Khan · · Score: 1

      Except for a few things:

      Raising a crop requires land. Land requires capital. Capital is available only through a lending institution or employment. Lending is out unless you already have some employment or collateral. Then, once you raise a crop, the price of that crop is dictated by large corporate farms that produce hundreds or thousands of times your own volume. THere is a reason the "American Farmer" is dead or dying. There may be some value to going "organic", but that can be a crapshoot depending upon region.

      Building a house requires not only land, but also materials, permits, and possibly other considerations.
      Painting a picture...well, I suppose if you have enough talent, is cheap enough to have a positive return.

      I could go on with little examples and smart-aleck responses all night, but in reality, the fact is that the vast majority of our lives are dominated at the highest level by corporate interest. It isn't like the top 20% are content with where they are, and are going to start letting everyone else in on the productivity profits. The fact is, the top 20% will continue to contentedly make 8/10ths of every dollar in the US. There is absolutely NO evidence that the United States is becoming better at the distribution of wealth, and numerous indicators that the wealth gap is, in fact, increasing. The folks at the top scrape and struggle to maintain their relative positions in society, even if it means others suffer.

      I'm sure I don't have to tell you these facts, but I will anyway.

      The Average CEO salary can employ 411 average workers in that same company. (So in essence, the pay of the CEOs of the Fortune 1000 eat up approximately 400,000 jobs)
      The GROWTH of pay for CEOs has climbed 300% since 1990, adjusted for inflation. In contrast, average company profits have risen only a third of that number, and average worker pay has climbed only 4.3%. The value of minimum wage has declined about 9% over that same period.

      Yup, that growth will "trickle down" to everyone, I'm sure. It's done a great job of it so far! It's not like it's just the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. After all, the middle class is getting poorer, too.

      --

      --- I'm going sane in a crazy world.
    44. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... who mans the kiosks at Wilt Stadium? Who cleans the stadium? Who guards it? Sells the tickets? In order to keep the costs down so Wilt can get more money from the punters, he needs to minimise his wages bill.

      No exploitation, puh-lease. Next time, don't be so selective in your free market make-believe.

    45. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      You mean the United Abominations??

    46. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yup, that growth will "trickle down" to everyone, I'm sure. It's done a great job of it so far!

      Actually it has. Compare the standard of living of the countries with relatively free markets to those of such socialist paradises as Cuba, the Soviet Union, China before they started to wise up, etc.

      As for the money that corporate CEOs make, what's it to you? Are you a shareholder?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    47. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      There is more than one Slashdotter. The people complaining that IBM are being ripped off are NOT NECESSARILY the same people who were laughing at Microsoft. It is to be expected that you will find contradictory views expressed in the comments, because Slashdot consists of more than one person.

    48. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by phlinn · · Score: 1

      From your earlier post, "I just want to be left the hell alone". That is only compatible with "Yes. As my friends and neighbors, they should get preferential treatment. In addition to that, they favor me with their business in return. That's called having a local economy" if it's voluntary. They have no right to force you to shop with them, nor do you have a right to force them to give your their business. If you start supporting government rights to interfere with other people, you have ceded your right to not have them interfere with you.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    49. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by phlinn · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that word "Steal". In no way have they stolen something. Stealing implies taking something that someone else owns. You do NOT own your customer's money, and them withdrawing the voluntary support they previously provided is their action, not the fault of the competitor. So you are blaming the wrong actor, and mislabeling the action.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    50. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's a vast difference between a billionaire entrepreneur like Steve Jobs, and billionaire kleptocrat like Castro.

      What about a multibillionaire like Gates, who built his entire fortune on illegal business practices?

      There is a saying, behind every great fortune there is a great crime...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Like other marxists, you completely ignore the effects of productive effort.

      Productive effort is equal among all human beings, and has almost nothing to do with the raw inputs of the product.

      If you raise a crop, build a house, paint a picture, or any of the other activities that people do for a living, you create wealth that did not exist before.

      Really? So where did the additional atoms come from? WEALTH is a real world physical item, not something imaginary you made up in your head.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    52. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So provide them with your business. What everyone else does with their business though, is none of your concern.

      It is if they use unfair business practices to put my local companies out of business.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    53. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The United Nations was formed to regulate business? That's news to them! [un.org]

      Not regulate business- hide the effects of business through mitigation of the starvation concentration of wealth causes.

      Also, advocating the slaughter of millions of human beings to support your worldview certainly illustrates what kind of worldview you hold.

      Why not? Philip Morris has made a fortune on "advocating the slaughter of millions of human beings". EVERY worldview is supported by the slaughter of millions of human beings.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    54. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually it has. Compare the standard of living of the countries with relatively free markets to those of such socialist paradises as Cuba, the Soviet Union, China before they started to wise up, etc.

      Is this the same standard of living that has been falling for the past 40 years?

      As for the money that corporate CEOs make, what's it to you? Are you a shareholder?

      If you have a Social Security Card, you've become a shareholder.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    55. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but no it isn't. Consider the Wilt Chamberlain paradox. First, everything is spread evenly among everybody. This gives everyone say $10,000 to with as they please. Now consider a million people want spend a dollar to watch Wilt Chamberlain play basketball. Mr Chamberlain now has a million dollars, and all the people that paid him the money are only short a buck. An amount they probably could have lost in thier sofa cushions. What if Wilt then decides to build a place for his fans to sit comfortably while he plays? A stadium of sorts. Now the contractors he hires to build the statium have more money than thier fellow citizens. This attracts more fans, and Wilt is even richer than before. But no-one is out more than a handfull of dollars, and Wilt is the richest person on the planet. The point being, that there is a concentration of wealth with no exploitation. No parasitic behavior. No enslaving your fellow man. Wilt just wanted to play basketball, the others saw a value in that and chipped in some money. The ones that didn't care, didn't give any money.

      Well, let's say then that Wilt was actually charging a *fair price* to play basketball. He's only getting that (for the sake of argument) $10,000. Now everybody who pays to see him play are only paying $.01 for their ticket instead of $1. Which gives them $.99 to spend elsewhere in the community. Now Wilt builds the Stadium. He figures out what it cost to build (the contractors only get their $10,000 each also), and figures the Stadium will last 20 years. Divide cost to build by number of seats by 20, and that's the amount to add to the ticket price. FAIR pricing does not include profit. Profit is proof of parasitical behavior.

      Also, economics isn't a zero sum game. For instance we can turn worthess dirt into valuable bricks or earthenware. Combine the non zero sum with that Wilt Chamberlain thing and we can be free, and have rich people.

      Dirt that you can turn into bricks or earthenware isn't worthless- and you owe the citizens of the country you dug it out of for it's worth, if you are being FAIR and not a PARASITE. You can't have freedom without eliminating profit.

      I'm not saying that exploitation doesn't happen, but the getting rich doesn't necessarily mean robbing the poor.

      Find another example then- because profit is the difference between paying a fair wage and charging a just price, and being a parasite.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    56. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that word "Steal". In no way have they stolen something. Stealing implies taking something that someone else owns. You do NOT own your customer's money, and them withdrawing the voluntary support they previously provided is their action, not the fault of the competitor.

      Depends upon if the competitor commited fraud or not to gain that business. Certainly using profits from one region to put people in another region out of business is a form of fraud.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    57. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What utter nonsense. Concentration of wealth in a free market is a result of finding out what your customers want, and supplying it.

      If you were only doing that, and charging a fair price, and paying fair wages, your profit would be zero. The price would cover labor+parts, and you'd make your customers VERY happy supplying it....but you wouldn't get rich. Concentration of wealth requires *overcharging* for what your customers want while *underpaying* to supply it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    58. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you start supporting government rights to interfere with other people, you have ceded your right to not have them interfere with you.

      So a multinational corporation has more rights than a citizen in your point of view- because if you try to use the government to interfere with them, they'll just use the government to interfere with you right back. And if you don't try to use the government to interfere with them, they'll just interfere with you right back anyway.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    59. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Dude, which is why is should be totally illegal for anyone to buy from, or sell from any other city. It should be illegal to leave the city you are born, because you could buy and sell while you are gone! Only when we are living in tiny economicly isolated enclaves like people did in the 1600, can our economy survive!

      Close- I'm definately a distributionist. Though it was more like 1300 when a man last had the right to own his means of production and followed moral law to treat customers and apprentices fairly.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    60. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by phlinn · · Score: 1

      Where did I say that if you don't use the government to interfere with them, it would be ok for them to interfere with you? Both sides have a right to be free from interference, if and only if they respect that right in others.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    61. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by phlinn · · Score: 1

      How is it fraud? There is no deception involved. They are making no claims, merely offering a lower price than their competitors. And even then, the customers have no obligation to shop local. You think it would be better if they did but that doesn't justify forcing them to do so. It is the customers choosing to shop elsewhere that is allowing your business to fall. They aren't putting you out of business, they are merely no longer supporting it. The business that is now out competing yours is not doing anything to you. Any regulation you want to put in to prevent it would be interference with the competing corporation or the customers. The only thing you actually have a legitimate right to do is change your own business practices.

      Failure to help is not the same thing as causing harm. You appear to be conflating the 2 with the language you have chosen.

      I'm not sure if this discussion will be very productive. I think we have belief systems that are partially based on incompatible axioms, so it will be difficult to come to any sort of rational agreement. We seem to agree that we want to be left alone, but if you don't agree with the above line about harm and failure to help, we are guaranteed to come to different outcomes on everything else.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    62. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Where did I say that if you don't use the government to interfere with them, it would be ok for them to interfere with you?

      What else can stop them? After all, the multinational corporations ARE de facto governments.

      Both sides have a right to be free from interference, if and only if they respect that right in others.

      Trouble is, one side is a de facto government bent on it's own profit- and thus will NEVER respect that right in others.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    63. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      How is it fraud? There is no deception involved. They are making no claims, merely offering a lower price than their competitors.

      A lower price based on a lie- then once the competitors go out of business, the prices go back up. That's the Wal-Mart way.

      And even then, the customers have no obligation to shop local.

      They do if they want to be masters of their own economy- masters of their own destity- instead of giving it away to foreigners who just want to make a profit.

      You think it would be better if they did but that doesn't justify forcing them to do so.

      I don't think it would be better- I KNOW it would be better. It's always better to do business with the guy you can kill if he cheats you- because it prevents him from cheating you.

      It is the customers choosing to shop elsewhere that is allowing your business to fall.

      And in so doing, they're cutting their own throats- because the multinational doesn't give a shit whether they live or die.

      They aren't putting you out of business, they are merely no longer supporting it.

      And in not supporting it, they're choosing to sell their very freedom to the multinationals.

      The business that is now out competing yours is not doing anything to you.

      Bullshit. They're lying to my customers.

      Any regulation you want to put in to prevent it would be interference with the competing corporation or the customers. The only thing you actually have a legitimate right to do is change your own business practices.

      In other words, the only legitimate right I have is to do what the multinationals have done- send my business overseas and say goodbye to any concept of a local community. They've taken away my right to have a local community, to have a local say in the laws of my own city.

      Failure to help is not the same thing as causing harm. You appear to be conflating the 2 with the language you have chosen.

      That's because implicit in the idea of a local community is citizens who help each other. Take that away, and you've killed the community. But that doesn't matter to the free traitors; they never cared about community to begin with, only profit.

      I'm not sure if this discussion will be very productive. I think we have belief systems that are partially based on incompatible axioms, so it will be difficult to come to any sort of rational agreement. We seem to agree that we want to be left alone, but if you don't agree with the above line about harm and failure to help, we are guaranteed to come to different outcomes on everything else.

      That's because you don't understand community- and the value of local community. Doesn't really matter, because concentrated wealth just creates violent revolution anyway.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    64. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Azure+Khan · · Score: 1

      Before I start this, I should probably mention: I believe Contra Costa should pay IBM. I'm not by NATURE socialistic or anti-corporate. I don't think you need to be a socialist to believe in fairer distribution of wealth. But hey, don't take my word for it, here's the CIA Factbook:

      The US has... a per capita GDP [PPP] of $42,000... The [recent] onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a "two-tier labor market"... Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households... The rise in GDP in 2004 and 2005 was undergirded by substantial gains in labor productivity... Long-term problems include inadequate investment in economic infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable trade and budget deficits, and stagnation of family income in the lower economic groups. -CIA factbook on the US economy, 2005 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world -factbook/geos/us.html#Econ

      The increase in productivity profit is being eaten up primarily by the people who already had the money. And, as a 401K holder and a pension owner, I am a shareholder. But I'm also a human being. Wealth inequity is a societal problem, and CEO pay is but one of a number of factors in that. As a member of society and a thinking human, I have every right to question those decisions.

      --

      --- I'm going sane in a crazy world.
    65. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Is this the same standard of living that has been falling for the past 40 years?

      People are of course working longer hours, and many more women work today, largely because of the increased tax burden that comes with a government that's growing out of control. I'm not sure that our standard of living has in fact been falling for forty years, but it's certainly below where it could be if we cut the government back to its constitutional powers.

      If you have a Social Security Card, you've become a shareholder.

      Very glib, but completely inaccurate. If you have a social security card, then you're someone who has been forced to pay into a bankrupt pyramid scheme. This is completely orthogonal to what the owners of a company choose to pay its executives.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    66. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Wealth inequity is a societal problem

      No, envy is an individual vice.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    67. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      People are of course working longer hours, and many more women work today, largely because of the increased tax burden that comes with a government that's growing out of control. I'm not sure that our standard of living has in fact been falling for forty years, but it's certainly below where it could be if we cut the government back to its constitutional powers.

      Would that include cutting out the completely unconstitutional act of creating artificial people through incorporation of businesses?

      Very glib, but completely inaccurate. If you have a social security card, then you're someone who has been forced to pay into a bankrupt pyramid scheme. This is completely orthogonal to what the owners of a company choose to pay its executives.

      The Social Security Trust Fund (bankrupt pyramid scheme to you) is partially invested in Treasury Bonds. Treasury Bonds are based upon the ability of the Federal Government to tax, which in turn is based on the ability of the Federal Government to regulate incorporation. So therefore, yes, each and every American is an "owner" of any company incorporated in America, and we should have a say in what companies "choose to pay their executives". In reality of course, neither shareholders nor the American public have any such say- CEOs are a closed society who serve on each other's board of directors and continually vote themselves largese from the treasury.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    68. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Would that include cutting out the completely unconstitutional act of creating artificial people through incorporation of businesses?

      Incorporation is a matter of state law, and the constitution doesn't prohibit the states from creating corporations, as they had been doing for quite a long time before the constitution was ratified.

      vote themselves largese from the treasury.

      Your statement presumes that the earnings of a company belong to the state, rather than its owners, which is utterly wrong, both legally and morally. If you object to the compensation of the executives of any company of which you are a shareholder, then vote your shares. For my part, I'm quite happy with the results I'm getting from the management of the companies in which I've invested. In fact, I'd love to see how much more I could make if Apple had given Steve Jobs *two* airplanes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    69. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Incorporation is a matter of state law, and the constitution doesn't prohibit the states from creating corporations, as they had been doing for quite a long time before the constitution was ratified.

      Yes, but in that case, shouldn't a corporation be limited to doing business in the state in which it was incorporated?

      Your statement presumes that the earnings of a company belong to the state, rather than its owners,

      Look at your money sometime- it's signed by the Tresurer of the United States, not the CEO of a company or it's owners. Earnings are only LENT to citizens to make economic transactions more efficient- money is ultimately owned by the government.

      For my part, I'm quite happy with the results I'm getting from the management of the companies in which I've invested. In fact, I'd love to see how much more I could make if Apple had given Steve Jobs *two* airplanes.

      Interesting. So you don't mind that Steve Jobs is stealing from you?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    70. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      shouldn't a corporation be limited to doing business in the state in which it was incorporated?

      Why, just to assuage your fear and ignorance?

      So you don't mind that Steve Jobs is stealing from you?

      My, you are thick, aren't you? Steve Jobs is compensated with my full consent, and that of an overwhelming majority of my fellow shareholders. He's done an incredible job, and we shareholders are considerably richer as a result.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    71. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Why, just to assuage your fear and ignorance?

      No, because you assert it's state's rights to govern corporations- thus shouldn't the corporation's corporate papers be limited to the issuing state?

      My, you are thick, aren't you? Steve Jobs is compensated with my full consent, and that of an overwhelming majority of my fellow shareholders. He's done an incredible job, and we shareholders are considerably richer as a result.

      Yes, but you'd be even richer if you paid him the same wages as the lowest factory worker in China. Or did that not occur to you?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    72. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      thus shouldn't the corporation's corporate papers be limited to the issuing state?

      I repeat: just to assuage your fear and ignorance? What possible benefit is there to the public from limiting interstate commerce in this way?

      Yes, but you'd be even richer if you paid him the same wages as the lowest factory worker in China. Or did that not occur to you?

      What clearly hasn't occurred to you, is the concept of incentive. Look at the dismal state of the Cuban or North Korean economy for the results of the polcies you advocate.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    73. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Incentive can be achieved with *any* difference in salary. It doesn't take a 400% increase to achieve incentive- a 10% increase will do just as well.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    74. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      If ever run a company, please let me know. I'll be sure to short your stock.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    75. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Many people have said that, and here's my answer to it- my companies will NEVER go public. Going public is *ALWAYS* a mistake for any company, it changes the planing from long term (and my companies plan CENTURIES ahead) to short term (Quarterly report to satisfy the investors). The closest I've ever come to issuing stock was The Oregon Project- and that stock is restricted from being resold (though it can be gifted and inherited), and the only thing it grants you so far is access to the message board of the investing club to suggest what to put pooled money into. Even that is looking centuries ahead- by the charter we only put money into retail companies that are using technology to gain an advantage over the competition by reducing headcount.

      Profit isn't the point of The Oregon Project- nobody will ever see a dime back from their investment in it- the point is to buy up land and natural resources so when human labor is no longer required in a couple of centuries, our kids will have land to live on and a bargaining chip with the multinationals that will replace government.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    76. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Many people have said that

      I'm sure many people have a keen grasp of the obvious.

      Going public is *ALWAYS* a mistake for any company

      Man, keep 'em coming! You're hilarious.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    77. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      OK, try this one- going public automatically destroys any entrapreneur's long term goals for a company, because he has now lost ownership in that company, even if he keeps 51% share of the stock, he now has to answer to the investors as dictated by the SEC.

      This makes a company effectively a psychopath- with one goal in mind, increased quarterly profit, regardless of what that does to the rest of society.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    78. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      going public automatically destroys any entrapreneur's long term goals for a company,

      Does the name "Warren Buffet" mean anything to you, sunshine?

      Some managers take a short-term view, some take a long term view. The market offers a myriad of choices to the investor, and we can pick the companies whose managers are doing what we want them to do.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    79. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Does the name "Warren Buffet" mean anything to you, sunshine?

      Yep, made his money on the short term view, turning over stocks every three months, and dumping entire country's currencies when they go bad (like he recently dumped the dollar). That's why the stock market is an evil to stay the hell away from.

      Some managers take a short-term view, some take a long term view. The market offers a myriad of choices to the investor, and we can pick the companies whose managers are doing what we want them to do.

      Managers who take the long term view, and whose companies are in the stock market, find their stocks worth pennies because everybody shorts them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    80. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      made his money on the short term view

      I see you know as little about Buffet as you know about capital markets in general. He made his money buying and holding companies for many years, mostly buying them when they were out of favor with other investors.

      That's why the stock market is an evil to stay the hell away from.

      Man, you just keep coming up with these knee-slappers. I love it!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    81. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I see you know as little about Buffet as you know about capital markets in general. He made his money buying and holding companies for many years, mostly buying them when they were out of favor with other investors.

      Only if you consider laying everybody off "holding them for many years". But hey- live in your fantasy world where having your company publically traded is anything other than a death sentence for any real innovation, where every real cutting edge project gets canceled the day a company goes public. Just look at google- jumping on the dead bandwagon of thin client office products just to suit investors.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    82. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's rich.. You, a self-declared pinko, say I'm living in a fantasy world.

      BTW, since you're such a fan of innovation, got anything to say about Lysenko? How about the fact that innovation in every field besides weapons came to a screeching halt in the communist countries?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    83. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      BTW, since you're such a fan of innovation, got anything to say about Lysenko? How about the fact that innovation in every field besides weapons came to a screeching halt in the communist countries?

      Now I'll really blow your mind- from my POV, Stalin was a capitalist. So was Mao. So were all the other totalitarians- communism (the economic system) and dictatorship (the governmental method) are not compatible. For that matter, democracy (the governmental system) and capitalism (the ecconomic system) aren't very compatible either- one needs the right to do harm to other people to be a capitalist. Fascism (the governmental system) is extremely compatible with capitalism. And you'd need *perfect knowledge* gathered by computers of *every* possible piece of data to make communism work properly; call it the governmental system of the borg, because that's the level of computer sensors that you'd need- monitoring the cellular level metabolism of everybody.

      Stalin and Mao were capitalists because communism was just a red herring- their real purpose was to aggregate 98% of the capital in 2% of the population (party members), just as the stock market seeks to aggregate 98% of ownership in 25% of the population.

      Socialism, which mixes democracy and communism, comes close- but fails because it doesn't have perfect information.

      Capitalism's fatal flaw for me is coercion and fraud- without the buyer being a mind reader, Laisez Faire fails to a lack of knowledge on the part of the buyer, and thus is open to coercion and fraud.

      I'm a software engineer- perhaps that's why software looks to be the answer for me. But you don't see Unix going through a depression due to a lack of disk space- which tells me software engineers are better at resource allocation than ecconomists.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    84. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      from my POV, Stalin was a capitalist. So was Mao.

      Ooh, good one! Defend your ideology by claiming that the mass murderers who epitomize it weren't really adherents!

      You know, I usually try to lead pinkos into reductio ad absurdam, but you charge right into it without any prodding at all.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    85. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Ooh, good one! Defend your ideology by claiming that the mass murderers who epitomize it weren't really adherents!

      Prove that they were. Find ONE Ukranian family that Stalin actually helped, instead of stealing all the food from. Just because you're stupid enough to fall for a con job doesn't mean I am.

      Now beyond that, I'm much more of a distributist than a communist anyway- I saw nothing really wrong with guild economics and feudalism ruled by the One Mother Church; it's a hell of a lot more moral than "profit is the only value that counts" capitalism and atheistic communism.

      You know, I usually try to lead pinkos into reductio ad absurdam, but you charge right into it without any prodding at all.

      That's ok, capitalism starts with reductio ad absurdam, in the concept that those who have subscribed to the mortal sin of greed are capable of any moral decisions at all, let alone sufficient moral decisions to dictate the lives of millions of people.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    86. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Find ONE Ukranian family that Stalin actually helped,

      Hold on there, sport: how do you get from murdered Ukranians to Stalin not being a commie? He robbed them, just as the rest of you pinkos want to rob everyone else who produces wealth, all for the "common good."

      dictate the lives of millions of people.

      Project much?

      Capitalists aren't trying to dictate anything to anyone, they're trying to find out what customers want and offer it, which is how you make money in a market economy.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    87. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, sport: how do you get from murdered Ukranians to Stalin not being a commie?

      It's more HOW he murdered them. One of the basic (and I mean *VERY* basic, as in so basic it's in the very first form of communism the planet ever saw, Acts Chapters 4 & 5 in the Christian Bible) founding principles of communism is "To each according to his NEEDS". Last I saw, food was a basic human need. What Stalin did to cause the Ukrainian famine (confiscating the *entire* crop of Ukrainian farmers to feed the party members in the cities, leaving no food for the people who create food and thus in fact creating the very failure his next 3 five year plans were) is the opposite of communism- it is in fact capitalism (the Communist Party in the USSR owned the State, the State owned the farms and thus the means of production, and therefore the confiscation of all the food was just taking what the CP owned- just like any other corporation).

      He robbed them, just as the rest of you pinkos want to rob everyone else who produces wealth, all for the "common good."

      You need to re-read Acts 4:32. You, like Stalin, don't understand the foundations of communism.

      Project much?

      Quite a bit, but I'm a distributist at heart. In other words, I believe in the soveriegnity of the neighborhood and the right to protect local economies from large scale meddling (whether that's the international imperialism of the 20th century "communists" or the international imperialism of 19th century "free markets" means very little- both are immoral interferances in the lives of local people by foreigners who have *NO* concept of what is required to live in a given climate).

      Capitalists aren't trying to dictate anything to anyone,

      Then they should stick with small businesses and mom&pop shops, where it is possible to know what the customer NEEDS rather than WANTS.

      they're trying to find out what customers want and offer it,

      An impossible task for any more than 500 customers. Of course, on the flip side, it's also an impossible task for more than 500 citizen/comrades....

      which is how you make money in a market economy.

      Making money is the mortal sin of greed. What you should seek is to bring honor to your family, your lord, and your God.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    88. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I'm just astounded at your utter dishonesty. Trying to claim that Mao and Stalin are capitalists is like a Christian trying to fob Torquemada off on the Buddhists.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    89. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm just astounded at your utter dishonesty. Trying to claim that Mao and Stalin are capitalists is like a Christian trying to fob Torquemada off on the Buddhists.

      The trick is to learn the difference between symbols and reality. The reality is, Mao and Stalin were as capitalist (and in fact, honest) as P.T. Barnum- and in fact, were in the same industry. Selling hope to the hopeless, and lying while doing it. Neither communism nor capitalism can exist for more than 500 people without fraud getting involved. And once fraud is involved, neither the commune nor the market can continue to be good. No dishonesty on my part- but a good deal of dishonesty on the part of those who consider large national markets or large national communes to be good.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    90. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Mao and Stalin were as capitalist

      That is what's known as a baldfaced lie.

      No dishonesty on my part

      The whites of your eyes have turned brown.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    91. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That is what's known as a baldfaced lie.

      Not at all- what is a capitalist? Somebody who owns a lot of capital, and uses it to create jobs and goods. Look at how the Communist Parties after Lenin were organized- the Party Chairman literally WAS the State, owned ALL the capital, and used that capital to produce jobs and goods as he choose. Both Mao and Stalin were in this mold- as was Carnegie with Steel, or Rockefeller with coal. If anything, they were MORE successful capitalists than any of our robber barons for they controlled 100% of the capital of their countries.

      The whites of your eyes have turned brown.

      Not if you're actually open to reason instead of just copying the labels of the past with no more intelligence than a parrot.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    92. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by jcr · · Score: 1

      what is a capitalist?

      Anyone you don't like, apparently.

      no more intelligence than a parrot.

      I can't imagine caring what someone who still adheres to marxism after the body counts of the twentieth century has to say about anyone else's intelligence.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    93. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Anyone you don't like, apparently.

      No- I don't like the Homeless or Illegal Aliens- but neither are rich enough to actually BE capitalists.

      I can't imagine caring what someone who still adheres to Marxism after the body counts of the twentieth century has to say about anyone else's intelligence.

      Once again, Marxism had nothing to do with those body counts- totalitarianism did. Marxism is an economic theory, not a governmental one. Only somebody stupid enough to parrot what they were taught instead of actually doing the research themselves would believe that.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. Wow by Wicko · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, yeah, about the 5 million... well, we were kinda expecting you to forget about it ya know? Thats what friends are for, right?

    On a serious note, I am surprised at no mention of paying a smaller amount or anything.. No they expect IBM to just forget about the whole thing.

  10. Cant "find" the computers? Then... by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...this invalidates the forgiveness part of their plea: Unaccountability encourages corruption.

    "What you subsidize, you get more of".

    Have the school district *try* a little harder to find out where it all went.... a good first step.

    If the taxpayers het mad enough at the failure to do this, *then* you'll get some accountability, although late.

    BWilde

    1. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IBM should insist on an audit by the district in order to find out what happened to these machines. If requested, IBM could even supply an auditor or two in order to help the school get to the bottom of this issue. $5 million in misplaced equipment is a big deal for a poor district, and they should jump at the chance to have IBM assist.

      If the audit is completed, and if the district makes its payments on time, IBM could then make a $5 million charitable donation to the district.

      That way, IBM would get good press, the district would hopefully straighten up their records, and everyone would be happy.

    2. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by smchris · · Score: 1

      No kidding. A person has to figure "somebody", most likely "somebodies" since nobody seems to have noticed what was going on, pulled a sweet crime getting away with stealing millions in PCs from a place with crap for accountability. I don't see why IBM should be particularly sympathetic to a mix of criminals and morons.

    3. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by pz · · Score: 1

      That's friggen BRILLIANT!

      Add to the list of benefits: if the computers are deemed stolen, the local District Attorney's office should have evidence after the audit to prosecute someone, even if that's the former head of the school board.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by jonatha · · Score: 1
      I don't see why IBM should be particularly sympathetic to a mix of criminals and morons.

      Well, IBM's board *does* support IBM upper management. Why *not* a second bunch?

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    5. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by empaler · · Score: 1

      No kidding. A person has to figure "somebody", most likely "somebodies" since nobody seems to have noticed what was going on, pulled a sweet crime getting away with stealing millions in PCs from a place with crap for accountability. I don't see why IBM should be particularly sympathetic to a mix of criminals and morons.
      It'd be a step up for them.
  11. $5 million computers NEVER USED? by squisher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, this is amazing. They ordered computers, which were never used... shouldn't that be an outcry? That school-district must have had a terrible administration at that point. I really don't see how the argument that they never used the equipment has anything to do with why or why not they should pay the bill. Afterall, IBM delivered, so why should they not get paid?

    If it wasn't for the fact that the administrators that created this mess are probably all not working there anymore, I'd say they should pay the full amount, with interest, as punishment for wasting the taxpayers dollars!

    1. Re:$5 million computers NEVER USED? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wow, this is amazing. They ordered computers, which were never used... shouldn't that be an outcry?

      Man, relax! This was the late-80s... $5M probably bought about a dozen computers (EGA monitors, 20MB hard drives and 2400bps modems not included). Besides, the "unavailable" hardware and proofs of purchase are probably just cover-ups for someone having lost one or both while on a three-week cocaine bender.

      Ah, those halcyon days.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    2. Re:$5 million computers NEVER USED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'd say they should pay the full amount, with interest, as punishment for wasting the taxpayers dollars!

      You do realize that any payment will be made with more taxpayer dollars?

    3. Re:$5 million computers NEVER USED? by unaussprechlich · · Score: 1

      only a couple of computers? assuming that they cost 15k each that would be 333 (and a third) computers. That would fill a classroom (or two) floor to ceiling with boxes. how do you steal or lose that much?

  12. Paperwork? by ignipotentis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Neither the paperwork or hardware could be located? Does this mean there is no proof of delivery?

    --
    Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
    1. Re:Paperwork? by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Well you know how early 90's IBM PCs were!! So tiny!

    2. Re:Paperwork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it means that in 1993 the superintendant and a buddy of his with an F-350 put a bunch of equipment in the back of a truck and sold it a pawn shop to feed his coke addiction.

      I say, make 'em pay the $5 mil. Teach the bitches a lesson in accountability (not mention financial planning).

    3. Re:Paperwork? by revengebomber · · Score: 1

      If I was the school district, I'd just file a PayPal dispute.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  13. $750 MILLION missing IRAQ defense funds missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Sixty Minutes last night. This is the kind of accountability we get from our government.

    Some company delivers millions worth of stuff and it just goes missing. The response from the govt is to ask to forgive and forget? For the children?

    IBM should not reward this corruption.

    1. Re:$750 MILLION missing IRAQ defense funds missing by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Where's the proof that the computers were ever delivered? There's no paperwork, no hardware, nothing! I'm extremely suspicious of the whole deal.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:$750 MILLION missing IRAQ defense funds missing by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The proof is in the government agreeing to an extended repayment plan. Admission that the debt is valid and owed. If there was any question as to the validity of the debt, it should have been raised 15 years ago.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  14. Rewarding corruption by athloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the school district is corrupt, and the computers got jacked, and now we want corporate America to take it as a tax write-off. I'd like to see it referred to a criminal court so the guilty actually pay the price.

  15. Can a IBM be publicly shamed into charity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our schools rely solely on limited state and federal assistance to educate our students and every dollar is precious."

    Of course. IBM should give away the 5m in dept. And given this wonderful opportunity, IBM should also point out to the four California state legislators, how using open standards could save them a few bucks in the future. So this district could cut some costs it obviously needs cutting. :)
    1. Re:Can a IBM be publicly shamed into charity? by josteos · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think they should not only write it off, but should offer the schools a new set of Linux-powered open-standards systems for free, to replace whatever system they have now that managed to lose track of $5M in hardware. And then advertise the hell out their corporate generosity.

      --
      Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    2. Re:Can a IBM be publicly shamed into charity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea!

      Dear IBM. We would like to take delivery of $5M worth of Linux computers. I promise we'll pay you in 2022, without interest, unless we decide we shouldn't have to.

      That's not good publicity, it's a precedent for no one to pay their bills.

  16. What a vague article by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For me, the issue of "How the hell do you misplace $5 million worth of computers???" is central to deciding if IBM should do this. No details were given on that little snafu. I'm not sure they should get a free pass for such incompetence, maybe the state should bail them out if they screwed up.


    Besides...lets say they were using the computers. How does the fact that they're missing affect whether they can pay for them? Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?

    1. Re:What a vague article by luchaugh · · Score: 1

      Um...$5million worth of computers? Even at, say, $2,500/system, that's 2,000 computers!! My money's on "never delivered in the first place". That's way too much stuff to simply "walk away".

    2. Re:What a vague article by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      >>> Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?

      True.

      I can see it now.

      School orders $5 mil in equip. Months later it shows up, but is delivered to wrong building. Someone who doesn't know what it's for accepts it and forgets about it. Paperwork is never processed. School calls IBM in a few more months and wants equipment. IBM says you've got it. School says, no, we don't. Project gets reevaluated and the money gets spent on something else.

      Months (or years) later, the equipment is stolen, or sold as surplus at auction.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    3. Re:What a vague article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've obviously never worked for or with any part of the California goverment. Stuff like that happens all the time. I spent 18 months as the primary subcontractor for a large federally mandated quasi government agency working in the workers compensation field that will remain nameless. They did an internal audit and found 2 BILLION dollars of equipment missing.

    4. Re:What a vague article by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?"

      Bwahahahahaha!!!! Somebody mod this guy "+1 Funny"

      Oh, wait - you were serious? Wow. Can I suggegest meds for those delusions?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    5. Re:What a vague article by mikael · · Score: 1

      Prices haven't changed than much since the 1980's. You could get an IBM AT system for around $4500, or an IBM XT system for $2500. That would give around around 1000 to 2500 PC's. That would have to be several truck deliveries. IBM should at least be able to say where they were delivered to. Did the administrators keep them for themselves, and never hand them out to the schools? Or did they just send them back?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:What a vague article by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?


      Considering that the district declared bankruptcy not long after these orders occurred, I think that's exactly what happened.
    7. Re:What a vague article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA. The STATE? Bail them out? The Governator doesn't give money to California schools (unless they're in LA -- governors from LA usually only shaft non-LA counties), he *takes* money from the schools. The state isn't going to give school districts jack, no matter what.

    8. Re:What a vague article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, wait - you were serious? Wow. Can I suggegest meds for those delusions?
      How about some meds for that stutter?
  17. Not only that by phorm · · Score: 1

    But the things can't be found. Now granted 15 years later they would be obsolete and very well may have been dumped, but what are the chances that alternately somebody either "borrowed" a few or even resold them?

    Forgiving the dept and not forcing an investigation seems to encourage negligence and corruption, indeed.

  18. Govt. effciency at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Oh, lets put them in charge of health care too!

  19. Forgiven because it's forgotten ? by cyberianpan · · Score: 1

    So because it's confusing & they've forgotten the details they want it forgiven ? Fine for charity but ask for it upfront. Now everyone's going to be afraid to enter into business deals with people who might be able to turn on the tears & wave the "deserving cause" flag.

  20. IBM should just turn it over by wtansill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to a collection agency. Let the agency buy the loan at a discount and then harrangue state officials until they ante up. It would be good for the officials to experience the same kind of pressure and hectoring that they allow consumers to endure...

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    1. Re:IBM should just turn it over by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is that deadbeats who dont pay their bills are being mistreated by collection agencies? I dont think so...in fact anyone who does not pay what they rightly owe should be shot on site. To do so makes you a common thief.

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    2. Re:IBM should just turn it over by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      That's true, assuming the person was actually responsible for the bill in the first place.

      When I left California, I called and got my power shut off. I confirmed my identity, and everything was good. Until 3 days later, my landlord pretended to be me and managed to get them to turn it back on without a lick of proof. He didn't pay it when it came due in a month, and it got stuck on me. A few months later, a collection agency calls. So-Cal Edison didn't even -try- to contact me, despite the fact that I left a phone number and physical address. I told them to stuff it and contacted the correct people to put it in dispute and why. (The asshole landlord is now in jail for child-molestation. He was a real, genuine asshole.)

      Not everyone who is harassed by these companies deserves it.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:IBM should just turn it over by wtansill · · Score: 1

      n fact anyone who does not pay what they rightly owe should be shot on site. To do so makes you a common thief.
      Come talk to me after you've had a major life reversal. You know, major long-term illness, laid off unexpectedly, house burned down, etc. etc.
      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    4. Re:IBM should just turn it over by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is that deadbeats who dont pay their bills are being mistreated by collection agencies? I dont think so...in fact anyone who does not pay what they rightly owe should be shot on site. To do so makes you a common thief.

      Have you ever stolen anything? Perhaps even accidentally, like picking up a piece of paper that doesn't belong to you? If so, you should be killed, because you are a thief.

      At least, it would conform to your own warped view of the world...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. IBM should forgive the debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's for the children!

    That argument works whenever we raise your taxes or take away yet another of your rights, so it should work when ripping off IBM.

  22. Cut 'Em Off by BigFoot48 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like the first world should cut off aid to Africa to ultimately strengthen it, corporations should cut off aid to school districts and other governmental dead beats who think technology will solve education problems.

    1. Re:Cut 'Em Off by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      They should, but it matters little in both cases where the lion's share of the 'aid' is taken by threat of force.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    2. Re:Cut 'Em Off by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      What idiot modded this "Funny"? Some African economists have been begging for the West to stop funneling money into Africa for years. And the result is more "aid concerts". When you send a billion to Africa, you are sending a billion to the same corrupt governments that caused the appalling current conditions. Cut off the money and you cut off arms sales, payoffs, etc.

            This is no joke - literally billions of people are endangered by well-meaning but ultimately foolish decisions like this.

            More money is not the solution to any of the world's current problems. US public education is actually an incontrovertible proof of this - a prototypical example.

              Brett

    3. Re:Cut 'Em Off by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Some argue that if you cut off aid you risk throwing nations into even more tumultuous states than before. However, I agree aid alone is also not the solution.

      The idea is that you cannot add ONLY money to a situation and expect the economy of a country to produce. The government has to have a minimum respect for property rights and be stable. Then, when the nation proves to be a place where people can actually do business, the economy will start to gain steam.

      If you worked at a company that had the opportunity to set up a store and sell items in nation 'X', and nation 'X' had a military junta running its government and frequently 'appropriated' local business assets to further its gain, would you ship $1 million worth of widgets there, knowing they could be stolen by the government? As a bank, would you loan money to a farmer to buy a tractor to automate his farming, knowing that farmer has no collateral to provide, the farmer has no experience farming or using heavy machinery, and that farmer could have his land seized at any time anyways?

      Aid is given to lessen the negative effect of market forces in a downward market. However, those downward forces are necessary to change the decision making of the economy: if there are no bad repercussions from an action, why not continue to loot the people of their property? I mean, the money will still come.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  23. IBM bent over backwards by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And the school still wants a free pass.

    What sort of example are they trying to set?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:IBM bent over backwards by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Think of the children! They are being taught not to pay their bills.

  24. Pay Up by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The school ordered and received the equipment. If they used them or not is irrelevant, and that they can't find the stuff or any records only speaks to their incompetence. They need to pay their bill.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Pay Up by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The school ordered and received the equipment.

      How do you know? The article only shows that they ordered it. I don't see any statement that IBM has a delivery receipt.

      They may very well have received the equipment, but I want to know how you know that this is true.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. For one reason or another? by Intron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love that part. I wish I could just order $5M worth of computer equipment using the taxpayer's wallet and then blame IBM for being hardhearted and cruel for not forgiving the debt. Why is the media not reporting on the waste and/or fraud involved in the original contract? Obviously, computers that were never used were not "needed", since the school district is still there and is apparently serving students. Who signed the original deal and what did he/she get out of it?

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    1. Re:For one reason or another? by dissy · · Score: 1

      Who signed the original deal and what did he/she get out of it?

      My guess is $5million worth of computers ;P

  26. What a load of crap by Flavio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees," the lawmakers wrote. "Our schools rely solely on limited state and federal assistance to educate our students and every dollar is precious."

    If every dollar is precious, they should've thought twice before spending $5 million in hardware that was never even used!

    This district's atrocious conduct is precisely the reason why IBM should not forgive the debt.

    1. Re:What a load of crap by caldodge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially this line: "Unlike corporations such as IBM, our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees"

      The school district is government-funded (next year's budget is $275 million, BTW), and their buddies in the government (all 4 politicians in the article are members of the party in control of the state legislature) can point the gun of government power at taxpayers and say 'fork it over, or else".

      Meanwhile, evil corporations like IBM have to _persuade_ people to buy their products and services. If IBM had some magical ability to "generate new dollars", then it's probable it wouldn't be engaged in the current "LEAN" layoffs.

      I'll believe those politicians when they have to lay off as many people (proportionately, of course) as IBM.

    2. Re:What a load of crap by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

      A lot of the comments on this thread talk about "the districts" bad behavior and how IBM should not forget the debt or they will "never learn".

      Whilst I have some sympathy with this view, it was so long ago that almost certainly the school district is now run by entirely different people who weren't responsible for running up the debt in the first place.

      The district should never have been allowed to borrow so much money in the first place. But someone did and if *I* was now running things I would most certainly be pleading with IBM to write off the debt - particularly if the alternative is bankruptcy. If you take over an organisation close to bankruptcy then pleading/negotiating with debtors is unfortunately part of your job.

  27. Well, these are politicians we're talking about by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their concept of money has never really reflected the real world. Mix that up with "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" and the school district's own inability to deal with money, and you can see where this came from, at least.

    IBM has been more than fair. They are owed their money. Mistakes are made, but unless the consquences are paid they will happen again.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Well, these are politicians we're talking about by sampson7 · · Score: 1
      See, the problem here is that these aren't politicians we are talking about -- these are school kids who are going to find that the old school budget is going to have an even bigger whole in it next year for crimes committed before they were born. $5 million is 20 additional trained teachers or thousands of textbooks.

      This article http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_5727158 has considerably more detail than the TFA.

      Notably, questionable spending by Marks, the Superintendant at the time directly led to this disaster.

      as well as budget shortfalls, were the main reasons the district spiraled into debt and eventually became the first school district in the state to file for bankruptcy.

      In addition to ordering the computers it could not pay for, the district used certificates of participation -- bonds designated for use on capital improvement projects -- for operating expenses. It also authorized a 17 percent raise for teachers even though there was no money to fund it. And schools were converted to "System for Choice" magnet programs, a costly endeavor, and state integration funds were used to pay for that program -- a move later determined to be an improper use of funds; the district is still repaying the state.

      The state bailed the district out in 1990 with a $9.5 million loan and again in 1991 with a $19.5 million loan. Neither was enough to prevent the district from filing for bankruptcy in 1991.

      To date, West Contra Costa school district has paid back more than $31 million and is making $1.4 million in annual interest payments through 2018.

      The district also makes almost $800,000 in annual payments on the certificates of participation debt it defaulted on during the budget crisis and $300,000 in annual payments to the state for misusing integration funds. In all, the district's current annual debt payments are more than $2.5 million -- the equivalent of about 10 teachers' salaries, including health and retirement benefits.

      When the IBM debt is added to the mix next year, the district will pay $3.75 million annually, a price that many say the students can't afford.

      Now I'm not necessarily advocating that IBM back down -- but enough the self-sactimonious comments about how children who weren't born when the computers were purchased should pay for the (likely) criminal ineptitude (or just plain criminal behavior) by the adults who were supposedly in charge.

      The fact is, corrupt/incompetent leadership can happen anywhere. Isn't that what the social safety net is supposed to safeguard against? Which works the greater injustice -- requiring each school child in Contra Costra to pay $10 to pay back ancient computers? On requiring each Californian to pay $0.10? Or having IBM make a "voluntary" tax deductible contribution to the school district?

      IBM's hands do not appear to be entirely clean here either. It is clear that it knew or should have known at the time that there was a problem with this deal and the School's ability to handle these computers. The article even says that it isn't clear whether the then-current Superintendant had the authority to enter into the deal and that IBM refused to take the computers back:

      "This was submitted to us as kind of a joint venture where IBM could showcase computers as learning tools for students," Calton said. "It was supposed to have a PR angle for IBM."

      When asked by the Times last week, the district could not track down invoices for the purchases, so it is unclear how many and what type of computers were ordered. But administrators agree the computers already were outdated when the district got them.

      "I think they were out of date before (Marks) even decided to buy them," Basalto said. "Every one of them was obsolete; they were absolutely useless."

      Where the computers ended up also is a mystery. Basalto recalls that

    2. Re:Well, these are politicians we're talking about by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Honestly, there are two things that should happen:

      1) Kids shouldn't suffer for adults bad decisions over a decade ago
      2) IBM should be paid.

      How that happens doesn't really matter to me; Obligations should be met. Otherwise this same behavior will repeat over and over. And speaking of children, what kind of example does that create for them?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:Well, these are politicians we're talking about by sampson7 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, there are two things that should happen:

      1) Kids shouldn't suffer for adults bad decisions over a decade ago 2) IBM should be paid.

      Welcome to public policy 101. Pick your poison.

      I hate to be flip like that, but it really (sadly) is often that simple. I don't see that IBM really has any realistic options.
    4. Re:Well, these are politicians we're talking about by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Notably, questionable spending by Marks, the Superintendant at the time directly led to this disaster.

      Questionable spending led to the disappearance of $5M in computers?

      Tell me where the computers went, then we can talk about what led to what.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Let me see if I understand this by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IBM has already given the district more than 15 years of no-interest loan on millions of dollars.

    Meanwhile, the State of California has insisted on, and gotten, much stricter terms (including interest.)

    Now, the State is suggesting that IBM should forgive their loan altogether?

    Maybe, if forgiving those loans is so good an idea, the State of California should go first?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Let me see if I understand this by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Now, the State is suggesting that IBM should forgive their loan altogether?



      No, the State is not. 4 out of 120 state legislators, representing West Contra Costa County and nearby areas, are. Big difference.
  29. No... by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    there is no reason that a resident of another state, or even another city (taxpayers, all), should bear the burden for a bad local decision.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:No... by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You mean other than the fact that you're supposed to be a union of states?

      Idiot.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:No... by cetialphav · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is exactly what I am thinking. I am a shareholder of IBM. I'm certainly not rich; I'm just a working stiff just like most other people. Why should I have to take the hit because of the idiots in that school district? (Yes, yes, I know that that $5 million has a negligible impact on my dividends due to IBM's size.) I am a reasonably charitable person, but I like to control who I donate money to. Mismanaged school districts do not seem like a worthy cause to me.

      This school district has been able to defer this debt for over 15 years. Where is my 15 year, interest free $5 million loan? I want a piece of that action.

      If we want to talk about bail outs, why not have the state of California bail out the school district? Why not have the citizens of that school district pass the collection hat round and round till they come up with the money?

      I'm sure there are going to be lots of "think of the poor children" arguments about this. It is real easy to have sympathy when it isn't your $5 million at stake.

    3. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no reason that a resident of another state, or even another city (taxpayers, all), should bear the burden for a bad local decision.

      Sure there is-- "For the GREATER GOOD!" HahahAHHAHAhahahAHha!!!!
    4. Re:No... by Rycross · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If you think that the federal government should step in and bail local communities out for stuff like this, then you know nothing about how the USA's government is structured. The federal government was specifically designed, with explicit verbiage, to stay out of local governments' decisions. In some cases, the line is blurry, and interstate commerce has generally been used as a back-door for the federal government to influence state and local governments, but the principle still remains.

      We kinda had a civil war over this kind of thing.

      In summary, you are ignorant, and doubly so for calling the grand-parent an idiot.

    5. Re:No... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      One wonders, too, if California will next encourage employees of the district to donate their salaries because, gosh, that school district has had such problems and just needs a little help. It's a damned shame that this community (like many others) and state (again, like so many others) can't manage to make their school system work, but I've got to agree with the position that IBM shouldn't be strong-armed into taking the hit - and making this kind of public appeal, where IBM could end up looking like scum if they don't forgive the debt, is definitely a strong-arm tactic.

    6. Re:No... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Doesn't quite work like that.

      Even a cursory reading of the Founders' beliefs and thoughts on the US Federal Government was that states are individual entities, experiments in diversity of regional and local government (yes, right down to their budgets - otherwise, states and locales would've never been allowed to levy taxes, and everything would've been disbursed from Federal revenues all this time). The common bond was that they accepted and abided by a common set of rules (e.g. the US Constitution), and pitched in together on Federal matters (Defense, taxation/tarriffs, infrastructure, etc), each according to their ability and population.

      Large-scale Disasters (Katrina), local debts incurred from assisting in (or cleaning up after) national emergencies (e.g. 9/11 or Oklahoma City), or debts incurred by the actions or mishaps any federal agency or branch makes in a locale (say, a fighter jet plowing into something accidentally)? No problem - totally cool with the Feds helping out in the money department.

      Bailing out the bad decisions made by a pack of politicians at some distant city council? Nope: they dug their hole - they can float bonds or raise property taxes to un-dig themselves out of it. If I have no vote or say in how that California county spends its discretionary budget, why should I (some random taxpayer up in Oregon) be liable for their mistakes?

      After all, if you or I do something dumb and run up a mountain of unpayable debt, the Feds certainly wouldn't be breaking their necks to bail us out... so why should cities and/or counties have such a privilege?

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:No... by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      That's like the school levies where I live. They spent a ton of money years back doing functionless remodelling (basically beautification), and now they're crying about money to pay for it. I mean, they should have replaced the text books from the 50's and the old ass desks, but instead they put in statues and gardens. Now, they think they're entitled to more money.

    8. Re:No... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A local government can *ask* the federal government for anything they like.

      In summary, you are ignorant, and doubly so for calling the grand-parent an idiot. I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:No... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      A local government can *ask* the federal government for anything they like.

      And? The assumption was that they should pay. Thats not how our government is supposed to work. The local government needs to take care of local issues.

      I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.

      You do now!

    10. Re:No... by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Schools don't deserve to be able to squander money on glossy paint, but don't you think that students deserve current textbooks?

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    11. Re:No... by Lesrahpem · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I do. My point is that they have a history of spending such levies on stuff they don't need. Rather than buying the textbooks, desks, and (possibly) updated computers they should be buying, they have a history of spending levies on statues, paint, gardens, the teacher's lounge, and sports equipment. A few years back they asked for a levie with the stated purpose being to buy said textbooks. They bought about 50 books and spent the rest on a new soccer field. Now, they have two soccer fields identical soccer fields, only one of which is ever used at a time.

    12. Re:No... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with giving money to schools is that school administrators tend to *always* spend it on glossy paint, then when the money is gone they turn around and complain about the books that they didn't buy when they had the money.

      A perfect example of this is the recent teacher pay raise in Utah. The teachers union (and basically everyone else) complained about teacher salaries so $100 million was raised to bump every teacher's salary by $2500 and give them a $1000 bonus. The school districts immediately began planning to spend that money on everything but pay increases. This has forced the legislature to audit the various districts to ensure that the teachers actually receive the money.

      I am sure that the school districts planned to simply continue doing the same thing that they have done for years. The plan undoubtedly was to complain about teacher pay, get more money from the legislature, and then spend the new funds on everything but teach salaries allowing them to complain about teacher pay the next year.

      What we really need are school vouchers. If there is one thing that public schools across the country continue to prove it is that the government does a poor job of providing education.

    13. Re:No... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      We kinda had a civil war over this kind of thing.
      Aye, and the states lost. And, nearly 150 years later, we've at least partially overcome the bogusness of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-fifths_compromi se
      If you were to model the government as a pure software application (and it's clearly not, but bear with me), you would want nice layers of abstraction, encapsulation, and data hiding, so that the main logic (the Fed) doesn't have to "bicker and argue over who killed who", or fret about individual citizens.
      That civil war occurred when information systems were implemented in pure people-ware, with paper storage. So concentrating power made sense, particularly in light of things like WWI, WWII, and the cold war.
      Yet now you have all of this IRS, SSA, and other entitlement programs, and it's all in one giant, nearly inert codebase executing (everything but itself), within the beltway. Your vote is drowned out in the cacophony of voters.
      But we can be confident that Lessons Learned only beget opportunities to repeat themselves.
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    14. Re:No... by sheehaje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is bad business... and then there is PR. Chances that the School Board that exists now isn't the one that was there in the early 90's. So, with that in mind, maybe asking for debt forgiveness shows actuall aptitude of the current school board. I know if I was on it, I'd be trying to negotiate at the very least. The other side of this is you have Microsoft "giving" schools technology, and so many other companies giving to education, to hold a school liable will not look good. If Big Bad Blue holds them to this, I don't care what you think, it just looks bad, and screwing up PR will probably cost more than the $5mil loan payback. It would be smart for both sides to come to some kind of settlement, both for a school district in debt, and for a company that still has the cold suit and tie image no matter how many witty commercials they put out.

    15. Re:No... by cetialphav · · Score: 1

      If there is one thing that public schools across the country continue to prove it is that the government does a poor job of providing education

      I'm not sure that is a good generalization. There are plenty of school districts in this country that are very well run and have great results. It really isn't that hard to find them either. Just follow the population growth. Good school districts tend to have great growth (and consequently good housing markets) because people want to move into those districts. The problem is that the school districts are locally run and there are lots and lots of them throughout the country. Statistically, some will be average, some will be above average, and some will be terrible.

      Take a city like New Orleans. They were represented in Congress by William Jefferson. The FBI found $90,000 of marked bribe money in his freezer. They investigated him for years. (He was just recently indicted.) In the last election, he was reelected! What kind of oversight of the school board do you think those voters do? What kind of school board do you think they have? Would you want to send your kids to public school there?

      There is competition in the market for schools, its just that it means moving and for many people that is a huge obstacle. Personally, I would move for better schools in a heartbeat, but not everyone is in my position. I think this is a big benefit to vouchers. In poorly run districts, people would flee the public schools in droves and this would put enormous pressure on those school boards.

    16. Re:No... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the states lost, nor that the states were using "states rights" as a euphemism for expanding the influence of slavery, doesn't mean the idea is dead or bad.

      I can't tell how you feel about the issue just by your post. Personally, I feel that the idea of keeping as much power as feasible at the state and local levels is a good idea. It gives people more power to influence the policies that affect them. Its easier to change that policy when you're voting against 1 million or 30 million, instead of 300 million.

    17. Re:No... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Where is my 15 year, interest free $5 million loan? I want a piece of that action.

      You could try starting here: 1-800-IBM-4YOU

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    18. Re:No... by hjf · · Score: 1

      And the funny thing about those soccer fields, is that they mean nothing. Soccer is not popular in the US. The US soccer team? Nobody cares about. Maybe not yet, but I don't see the point even in spending any money in soccer fields in the US.

      And I don't know about "spending money on a soccer field" either. You see, I live in Argentina. We and Brazil have the world's finest soccer teams, and our children don't play in million-dollar fields. They play wherever there's some open land. A goal can be two bricks, and that's it. Sure, my school had a paved playground-soccer fields and two goals (no net). It was paved only because they used it as parking space on the night shift "tertiary" school.

      That's one thing I have noticed about American style "games". You can't just "play" a game. For baseball, you need a special ball, a bat, and the bases, and clothes to spare. For american football, you need helmets, protectors, a special ball, and even a special goal. For basketball, you need a special court!, and ball, etc.

      Soccer is nothing like that. You need the ball, but if you don't have one, that's no problem, you can make one out of some old rags. You can play anywhere that's big enough. It can be pavement, grass, or even dirt. I mean, you can't really play baseball with a broomstick, or basketball with a rag ball. You can try to play football, but you will be better off playing Rugby.

      I guess that's one of the things that give the US their economic power (consumerism, or the need to buy something before doing anything). But I'm not sure what's best.

    19. Re:No... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You stated it a bit more clearly than me.
      On an acute basis, we need concentrated power. Once people are ensconced, they want to wield their power on a chronic basis. It's too easy to ignore the creeping acquisition of power.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    20. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, they deserve current text books. Let the parents pay for them. Not IBM. And certainly not those of us who choose not to have children. Pay your own fucking way through life, breeders. If you have kids, don't squirt them out and then bitch to ME because YOUR kids don't have what they need. Not. My. Problem.

    21. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bailing out the bad decisions made by a pack of politicians at some distant city council? Nope: they dug their hole - they can float bonds or raise property taxes to un-dig themselves out of it.

      Bullshit. Take it out of the pay of Every city and school official that is making 6 figures or more. That's the price you pay to be the rich man sucking on the government teat. Starting with the mayor and city manager, take it out of their salaries.

      Screwing the taxpayers is NOT the answer, make the rich fuckers pay for it.

    22. Re:No... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but we can't forget ... the children.

      Jesus Christ I feel dirty just typing that. But for serious this time; there are goinna be some relatively screwed kids out there because of these idiotic bureaucrats. At the same time, however, I didn't elect those idiotic bureaucrats or otherwise make it easy for them to be put in power, so why should me or my kids be punished because of this?

      So, under the official guise of not forgetting the children, I say we kill each member of the school system who had a hand in this debacle and harvest their organs. We should at least be able to get the 5 million debt down to some tolerable level, I'd say. Plus we'd all feel really good doing it. It's a public service in more ways than one! Bailing out a school by helping to pay off debts, helping people who require transplants to survive, getting IBM their 5m fee for all the work they've done (maybe we should kill some of the bureaucrats' families and take their organs too, just so we can up the 5m to something larger - you know, account for interest, just in a good faith sort of way), and on top of all that, you have the unparalleled terror for all other officious pricks who can't do their fucking jobs and somehow "lose" and somehow manage not to pay for 5 million dollars worth of equipment. People everywhere will be dropping out of the running for the school board once they find out their fucking lives are on the line.

      Sure, it's a little violent and messy, but it's for the greater good, no?

    23. Re:No... by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Some would argue the only things we need a federal government for would be national defense against aggressors and Mother Nature. The rest seems to get in the way of its own two feet.

    24. Re:No... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      this is retarded - you people (and by you people, I mean you Americans) aren't willing to pay a $5mill debt for a school, but you're more than happy to spend billions bombing the middle east into the stone age.

      Just keep believing god is on your side so education won't matter.

    25. Re:No... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Take it out of the pay of Every city and school official that is making 6 figures or more. That's the price you pay to be the rich man sucking on the government teat. Starting with the mayor and city manager, take it out of their salaries.

      *shrug* - works for me... whatever it takes to get 'em out of their own mess. OTOH, somebody appointed those cretins to office, and they in turn were elected...

      Just a thought.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    26. Re:No... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.

      Well, they're normally called buffer overflows but yeah... dunno how it fit in this one...

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    27. Re:No... by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well obviously I've heard of ignorance of arithmetic :)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    28. Re:No... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The school district could always cancel all athletic programs and sell the land the football field is on to a developer. Probably that would pay for the debt with no problems. Here in the midwest where I live, it seems there is no limit to how much money can be poured into the rathole known as sports.

    29. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    30. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's for sure. Back in my day, we played baseball the way it was meant to be played: with rocks, in the middle of busy streets. And we were damn happy. Football was about the same, but bigger rocks, and on the interstate. How many times have you been tackled by a '47 Buick goin' 55 miles per hour? Yeah, it sucked. But did you hear us complaining? Hell no. And don't even get me started on basketball. Have you ever tried to dribble a rock? That's right. You haven't. Back then, "Go play outside" really meant something. God damn kids these days, with their fancy synthetic rubber, and what-not, always running around my damn lawn.

    31. Re:No... by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be smart for both sides to come to some kind of settlement
      You mean like agree that the school will pay it off in four $1.25 million installments starting 15 years from now? That's a great idea!
    32. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Big Bad Blue holds them to this, I don't care what you think, it just looks bad

      Making an announcement is sort of forcing IBM's hand, and it appears you've already made your judgment. The people representing the schools *used* PR as an opening salvo, when a meeting between the two might suffice.

    33. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, think how many Gypsies you Europeans could sterilize for $5 million dollars!

    34. Re:No... by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      I'm sure IBM makes some charitable contributions. I think they should turn the publicity around by donating this debt to the Red Cross or City of Hope or something. Then if the school district doesn't pay up, the school district will be the bad guys.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    35. Re:No... by cerelib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many sports can be played in small, restricted versions with less resources. Another poster has pointed out stickball as a restricted form of baseball. You don't need much to play football. You can play it in the middle of the street if you want to. My guess is that you never did that because where you grew up, kids played soccer instead. Let's look at soccer. Would you agree if someone said that you need special goals, a special ball, shin guards, and a huge playing surface with offsides lines to play soccer? Of course not, because those things are not needed for the small restricted form of the game that is casually played. Soccer is great, but don't be unfair and try to make it look like the game that God handed down to humanity. What do you think American children do during school recess?

    36. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little unorthodox, but definitely likely to help the children long term. Get the power-freak politicos out of the education business and who knows what might happen, beyond that it will surely be good?

      Get rid of the bums, and send the bill to the people gave the bums authority. In this case, I'd guess that's a combination of the voters who elected the local school board and the state legislature that set rules for teacher and administrator certification which are more concerned with diversity than education.

    37. Re:No... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      And? The assumption was that they should pay. Thats not how our government is supposed to work. The local government needs to take care of local issues.

      The sad part is the kids in the school district are the ones who are going to get an underfunded education because the ones in charge purchased $5 million in computers, and then--somehow--forgot to do anything with them, and then lost them. Then again, with incompetent leadership like that, it'll be a miracle if the kids learn anything at all...

    38. Re:No... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      What do you think American children do during school recess?

      What is this "recess" of which you speak?

      (That was a rhetorical question. Last time I recall there being a time in the middle of the school day when the kids got to go out onto the playground and do whatever for a while, I was in 1st grade...and that was back in 1978. Nowadays, instead of letting them burn up all of that energy they've built up sitting around in class, we dope them up to make compliant little drones out of them if they get too restless. My experience was with four schools (in as many states) in six years from kindergarten to 6th grade (skipped half each of 1st & 2nd grade), and only one of them did recess.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    39. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Truth be told: They are in California! California taxpayers pay more to public schools than any other state, per capita CA is in the top 5. 5 million dollars is nothing to Costa school district. School Districts that size could find that money in a year or two. They just need to shave a few hundred here and there and cut one of their other million dollar projects. Sadly, school seems to breed unaccountability.

    40. Re:No... by GregPK · · Score: 1

      So... let me get this straight. Big blue sells computers to a defunct district, District defaults, IBM keeps it on thier accounts payable for 10 years!!! interest free!!!!, probably cost IBM already 5 million on accounting records and man hour alone dealing with it. Then, legislators try to pressure them into forgiving the loan. Even as a private person I know a greedy public service person when I see one. Make it stick IBM, stick it to them.

    41. Re:No... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      except those people are long retired. This is about govt being held to it's agreements over the long term. If IBM allowed this every local bond issue would be contested after the 10 or so years to maturity... it'd be a mess and no business would deal with districts. No kids would get deals from businesses on stuff schools need if the schools don't pay their bills.

      That said, these poor administrators are screwed. But they are supposed to be done paying back another loan to the state (notice the STATE didn't let them off the hook, yet expects a private company to!) They made a settlement 14 years ago... this is why we can't let people spend our kids' money... when the piper comes they get screwed.

    42. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we really need are school vouchers.

      You already have them, the vouchers are called "The Dollar".

    43. Re:No... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      the different accounts need ring-fencing to prevent this. Money allocated for the "Books" account should have to be spent on books. If they haven't got different budgets/accounts, then they need to be set up and enforced.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    44. Re:No... by agileinfosystems · · Score: 1

      Good dude.

    45. Re:No... by leoc · · Score: 1

      I own a few IBM shares too, and I would have absolutely no problem with this because the positive benefits of the action (good PR for IBM, potentially brighter kids coming out of that school district who could be hired by IBM some day and contribute to its success, etc) would most likely outweigh the paltry $0.003 per share it would cost.

      --
      STFU about slashdot bias.
    46. Re:No... by scottmillerinva · · Score: 1

      can you enlighten us on which documents a cursory reading of would show that our "Founders" intended for the federal gov't to assist in paying for disasters, cleaning up disasters, emergencies, etc... I'm always up for learning more about our "founding" fathers intentions. Cheers.

    47. Re:No... by timster · · Score: 1

      Youth soccer is very, very popular in the US. For various reasons most kids stop playing in their early teens.

      As for spending money on a soccer field versus playing in any open land, well, that's America for you; lots of money around means lots of money wasted.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    48. Re:No... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.
      There isn't, idiocy has a geometric relationship with idiotic acts. The GGP is not a double idiot, as the GP has said -- they are an idiot squared if he had bothered to do the calculations properly. What an idiot.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    49. Re:No... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Sports funding has always been an interesting subject for me. On one hand, you could completely subsidize the schools on land taxes and kill the farmers who might not even have a kid in that school, or you can build a stadium, and make all the parents of the kids who actually go to the school pay the high ticket price voluntarily. I don't know how it was/is at your high school, but at mine, sports funded a huge chunk of the general education bill. In doing so, property taxes were lower.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    50. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would start with the U.S. Constitution which officially formed a federation among the states. Pay particular attention to "expressed powers" and "reserved powers". And don't forget the amendments which have slowly eroded state sovereignty. I would then peruse the Federalist Papers by Hamilton and others. Add in the relevant Supreme Court decisions and then you'll understand.

    51. Re:No... by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Are we sure they "forgot to do anything" with the computers. I have a feeling that the computers made someone a profit, and it clearly wasn't IBM, or the kids.

    52. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... what you claim is true in popular culture, but not that true traditionally in the US. There's a game here known as stick-ball which is well known to all New-Yorkers. Stickball is traditionally played on a not-to-busy street, and the only peice of equipment is a ball the size of a baseball, and a good strong broomhandle.

      In other areas of the US, out of a group of kids someone generally has a bat, honestly I think it's unfair to consider a bat and small ball particularly much more "special equipment" than a soccer ball, especially since the soccer ball requires a way to inflate it, and wears out faster than a baseball.

      Also, soccer is actually a VERY popular sport in the US. It's popular for kids to play though, not for grownups to watch. I played soccer both seasons for about 6 years, my brother for longer (we both quit in highschool cause the coach was a dick). There's a reason that the term "soccer mom" was coined. It's come to mean upper middle class mothers who shuttle their kids around alot, but initially at least my mom felt that it applied to her, someone who was willing to stand out in pooring rain and high-winds to watch her sons play soccer.

      When I was in highschool I played primarilly ultimate frisbee. For ultimate frisbee you need a 175 gram frisbee... and that's it. A good disc costs about $10.0, that's not much equipment. Ultimate frisbee was invented in the US, actually in Amherst Mass near my home town. We actually played competitivly (though we sucked because it was a new team).

      This evening I will be joining some friends to play soccer on a field at the university where I work. Someone got ahold of some cones for about $0.20 a piece, so
      we use cones for the goals, if we didn't have them though we'd just use some shoes or something. And of course, someone owns a ball.

      It is true that popular American culture pushes sports that require expensive gear, and many many people certainly do buy into it, but not all of us. My other favorite sports are running and hiking, the only gear required being shoes which I wear out every 2-4 months. Though I will admit to also enjoying mountain biking, climbing, caving, backpacking and whitewater kayaking, all of which involve a fair amount of gear (though caving and backpacking can both be done for $100.0, for other sports I borrow from a club).

    53. Re:No... by Cauchy · · Score: 1

      But, why $5M to THIS particular school district. It is one of many across the country. While there are some bad areas in this country (Richmond, east Oakland, etc), there are many school districts that are more deserving of a $5M donation.

    54. Re:No... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Trying to negotiate is one thing. The school board and thestate legislators using this kind of public blackmail is totally different. I would not be surprised to turn on the TV and see these blackmailers holding up teary-eyed children who'll be asking the camera "Why do IBM hate us?"

      If IBM do write-off the debt, they should be doing it because it's the best thing for IBM stock holders. I suspect that a settlement will be reached because it's difficult for IBM to just ignore their request. I hope they find a deal that works for both sides but certainly doesn't set a dangerous precedent.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    55. Re:No... by hjf · · Score: 1

      I meant that for playing soccer you don't *need* those things, but for baseball, football, and basketball, you can't play without at least *some* of the special equipment.

    56. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think the same crap happens in private schools, but with even less public accountability? Maybe you should try going to one, where the football team's uniforms are always newer than the textbooks, teachers are underpaid and forced to teach subjects they didn't study in college, and the best-paid guy in the system is the accountant who handles the endowment.

      The worst of it is, even if you try to give money to specific purpose, like a Fine Arts fund, it ends up getting shuffled around a bit before being spent on new, glass backboards in the basketball court.

      In short, private schools are run just as incompetently as public schools, it's just that no one ever realizes it because their transactions aren't public.

    57. Re:No... by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      Pay your bills, deadbeats. Seriously. If IBM owed the government money, would the government let them turn it into a charitable donation? I don't think so. Ask Willie Nelson. IBM is IBM, and 5 Million is coffee money for them, but still. Is there still a debtor's prison. Do the right thing. You have the product, the fact that you lost it proves that your deadbeats and stupid, not just deadbeats. wow. 1 more time. Pay your bills.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    58. Re:No... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      I am not denying that there are good school districts. I just think that it is a shame that the only way get your children in them is to move. Vouchers solve that problem nicely without bothering good school districts at all.

    59. Re:No... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Of course there are some bad private schools. However, the beauty of school vouchers is that I get to choose. Heck, perhaps I *want* my children to go to a school where more money is spent on football uniforms than text books. I had a couple of buddies go to school on athletic scholarships. If you have the aptitude athletic scholarships are a perfectly good way to get someone else to pay for your schooling.

      As far as private schools being as incompetent as public schools, I beg to differ. I guarantee you that you can't point to a single private school that somehow managed to misplace $5 million dollars worth of computers as this particular school district in California seems to have done. The fact of the matter is that private schools face pressures that no public school district ever has to face. In a private school if parents don't think that your services are worth their money they can leave. Unpopular private schools end up getting closed down. With the current public school system the only options that I have if I end up in a bad school district is to A) move, B) pay for private school out of my own pocket, or C) home school my children myself.

    60. Re:No... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      In this area, the schools starve the rest of the budget to build big arenas and 'palace like' locker rooms. Besides which, it isn't an either-or situation. I was describing a best-case scenario. That probably would be one in which schools are supported in ways that the taxes aren't crippling.

      I know I'm a dreamer (the elimination of 'organized' high school sports)
      but I'm not the only one.

    61. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      screwing up PR will probably cost more than the $5mil loan payback
      Except that it won't end with $5M.
      If IBM forgives this debt, then every school district in the country that owes IBM money will try to pull the same scam.
    62. Re:No... by cerelib · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand what I am saying. You don't "need those things" for a lot of sports. Looking again at football. All you need is at least something that hopefully, but not necessarily, resembles a football that can hopefully be thrown. In soccer, you need at least something that resembles a soccer ball that can be kicked. How is soccer any better than football in this regard? I would argue that football may have it a little better because more things can be effectively thrown than can be effectively kicked(i.e. You could play football with a soccer ball, but would have a hard time playing soccer with a football). Don't be so close-minded about this. Sports exist on many different levels. What you see on television is made for the entertainment of the audience, not the players. People find different ways to play when it is for the entertainment of the players.

    63. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stand out in pooring rain

      "pouring".

    64. Re:No... by hjf · · Score: 1

      As I said, in order to play football, you need some sort of protection. If you don't wear any protection, you are going to get hurt (unless you play like a girl ;). You can play rugby instead of football. It doesn't require protection and uses the same ball (sort of). Don't get me wrong. I didn't say that consumerism was a bad thing. For years my country's economy was based solely on that. If a sport needs some equipment (clothes, accesories, balls, whatever), it opens the possibility for you to make and sell a product, jobs, whatever.

      As a side note, I guess all that equipment changes the sport. I don't think football players would be so aggressive if they didn't use helmets, and soccer players won't need shin guards (and special socks to accommodate them) if they didn't use soccer shoes.

  30. I need a grammar NAZI by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for.

    How should I have punctuated that?

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:I need a grammar NAZI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just lose the comma between "white" and "dudes" and you're good.

      Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white dudes who nobody has pity for.

    2. Re:I need a grammar NAZI by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      How should I have punctuated that?

      If you *really* want to write it properly, it's Not all stock investors are rich fat white dudes for whom nobody has pity. People will tell you that you should put commas after rich and fat, but they are wrong.

  31. It's not too unfair by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big Blue can afford it. Nobody seems to dispute this.

    The school will have difficulty paying the money back. The owed money may end up being written off anyway.

    Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. There's a lot of pressure being applied but it's up to IBM, and IBM can benefit from this. They'll get some of the money back as a tax break, more as good PR, and this will mean more money for the school to spend education, which will benefit IBM in the long run. That, and the person who makes the decision will have a feeling of being a nice person.

    Ultimately it will be better for everyone if IBM forgives the debt.

    1. Re:It's not too unfair by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The school system is more than able to pay their debts. They just don't want to. Fsck them. IBM should do whatever will cause the most political pain to the asshats running the school system. I'm tired of school officials who waste money like drunken sailors, and then come crying to the public, saying that if we really cared about the children, we'd vote to fully fund their bloated budget request.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:It's not too unfair by TopSpin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. Sure, the CA legislature isn't going to allow any 'lack of cooperation' on IBM's part influence future contracts. There won't be any sudden desire to 're-evaluate' any purchasing schedules that IBM might have a piece of. Nah.

      which will benefit IBM in the long run Teaching your customers that you roll over and write off invoices is a great business precedent. I know I won't mind when one of my employer's govt contracts just walks away with the product.

      Grown-ups understand that when some podunk school district runs itself into the ground the state government is where the bill lands. CA pulls down $100,000,000,000 a year in tax revenue. Never mind the municipal, county and other tax and fee revenue. Never mind Federal education dollars. For the state, where this problem belongs, the bill is so small it's difficult to detect, so why are a gang of D-*s parading this 'forgivingness' idea in front of the cameras?

      IBM fucked up when they arranged this 15 year no-interest nonsense and now they're getting precisely what they deserve. I feel nothing for IBM in this and if they roll over again I hope every legislature and school district in the nation notices.

      There is another angle to this also; How will IBM's (or any other business that has to deal with local school districts) behavior change as a result of getting publicly raked over the 'for the children' coals by these shameless politicians? So much for any leniency in terms for the no-so-well-off school districts. Thanks, CA, keep electing these people.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    3. Re:It's not too unfair by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I know some very, very nice people who happen to have gotten in over their heads in credit card debt. We're talking maybe $10,000 or so of debt here. They've gone through a credit counseling agency, and had the debt restructured with Visa so that they're on a special payment plan with a lower-than-prime interest rate. But they're still having a hard time making the payments, and it would be very nice if Visa could just forget about the debt.

      Visa can afford it. Nobody seems to dispute this.

      My friends will have difficulty paying the money back. The owed money may end up being written off anyway.

      Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. My friends have applied a lot of pressure but it's up to Visa, and Visa can benefit from this. They'll get some of the money back as a tax break, more as good PR, and this will mean more money for my friends to spend on consumer goods, which will stimulate the economy and benefit Visa in the long run. That, and the person who makes the decision will have a feeling of being a nice person.

      Ultimately it will be better for everyone if Visa forgives the debt.

    4. Re:It's not too unfair by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      $5 million is a lot of money, even for a company like IBM. The state is forcing this into the media because they want to make IBM look bad for taking money from a school. A contract is a contract, you shouldn't be made to look bad for taking money owed to you. Whether IBM can afford it is irrelevant.

    5. Re:It's not too unfair by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Ultimately it will be better for everyone if Visa forgives the debt.

      Yup. I've come to the same conclusion. Hell, who forced Visa to lend them the money in the first place?

  32. Most stock investors... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for. Are your pension funds... They're the biggies anyway.

    Those rabid capitalist CEOs? They work for little old ladies.

    --
    Deleted
  33. Mismanagement is not an excuse by iPaul · · Score: 1

    From reading the article it sounds like the problem was one of management. It might even be a criminal problem if the equipment can't be located. Having worked with IBM on deals before (and remembering what IBM was like at that time), I'm sure it was the highest margin equipment on the market. However, just b/c the school district made a poor purchasing decision, mismanaged what it bought, and possibly permitted its theft, should not let them off the hook on a contract.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
  34. contra costa country by olmy · · Score: 5, Informative

    as mentioned in the comment section of the network world article:

    "of course, it's worth pointing out that Contra Costa County is the predominant county and tax base for the East Bay -- a sprawling set of towns/cities full of people that work in downtown San Francisco, Oakland, and Silicon Valley. It's the same county where median home prices for most of the towns are well north of $500,000.

    To quote the Contra Costa website: "Due to the presence of relatively high-wage skilled jobs and relatively wealthy residents, the County achieves high rankings among all California counties on a variety of income measurements."

    This isn't the story of an impoverish[ed] county begging for debt relief from an evil corporation. Move along."

    1. Re:contra costa country by puto · · Score: 1

      God damn right. Glad you pointed it out.

      I work for a company out of San Francisco but live in Jacksonville, Florida.

      I looked at homes compared to what I have here, and when you see a 1200 square foot shack for 800k to a million, you think, where is the quality of life? And besides the good food, San Fran ain't all that fun.

      Keep on whining San Fran, California, with your double standards for the rest of the country. We should deed you over to Canada.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    2. Re:contra costa country by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > We should deed you over to Canada.

      Apparently you've not spent enough time here to pick up on West Coast politics. Your proposal would go over quite well here. Aside from maybe the five foot diameters around Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore, I don't think you'll find a more anti-bush place ANYWHERE in the country.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  35. Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Research suggests the county population is quite well off as compared to other counties. http://www.city-data.com/county/Contra_Costa_Count y-CA.html

    At what point does this cross over from "poor school district" to clever constituents trying to get out of a deal?

    I doubt this would happen in, say, compton CA.http://www.city-data.com/city/Compton-Californi a.html

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by magarity · · Score: 1

      Excellent page you've linked. Here's a choice bit:
       
      Current Operations - Elementary & Secondary Education: $63,866,000
      Tax - Property: $292,632,000
      Miscellaneous - General Revenue: Interest Earnings: $23,905,000

      24 million just in interest from investments, nevermind the 1/3 billion in property taxes and they don't have a lousy 5 million to pay off an honest debt?

    2. Re:Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Research suggests the county population is quite well off as compared to other counties.


      Further research would show that the area served by the West Contra Costa County School District is very different from the Contra Costa County as a whole. Particularly, the residents there are generally less well off, and poverty is something like twice as high. Richmond isn't Walnut Creek.

      It is the former, not the latter, that is relevant, if anything at all.
    3. Re:Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      California has a law in place that limits the amount of revenue which can be gathered via property taxes. Merely having wealthy people with expensive homes on your soil, therefore, only marginally increases the wealth of the municipal government. They must spend their money locally for sales tax to allow money to flow into local coffers, or the district must get their pittance from the fed and the state, or the locals must pass bond measures to voluntarily increase their own property taxes. People rarely volunteer to pay higher taxes.

      So, basically, if you're a bedroom community like Contra Costa, you're fucked. Nobody will volunteer to raise their own taxes, and Prop 13 is a political third rail - touch it and ya dead. That's why California is a very wealthy state with very poor services.

    4. Re:Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by Alotau · · Score: 1
      Interesting comparing a County (Contra Costa) to a city (Compton). It would be more appropriate to compare Compton to this http://www.city-data.com/city/Richmond-California. html. There are some very well-off parts of the county and some downright awful parts. The West Contra Costa Unified School District (WCCUSD) covers one of the awful parts. My fiancee taught in that district for three years and I grew up in that county. The school districts are quite distinct... for example, if I had lived a couple blocks east, I would have been in a better district with several AP courses at the high school instead the 1 that was offered at mine.

      Some interesting facts about Richmond, CA (part of WCCUSD) from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richmond,_California:

      Richmond is statistically the second most dangerous city in California, surpassing Oakland in 2004, and was named the 8th most dangerous city in the country. For every 100,000 people there were 38.3 murders, 50.4 rapes, 485.8 robberies, 512 assaults, 1110.7 burglaries, 3497.4 counts or larceny and 2471.4 thefts of vehicles. Richmond had 40 murders in 2006. The record of 62 homicides occurred in 1991.
      Another fun fact (and I can't believe I am about to mention this movie): the movie Coach Carter was based on a high school in this district. My point is that this is not the "quite well off" populace the blog poster would have you believe.

      And more to the point, it helps to read the news articles on which this biased blog post was based (http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_5727158 and http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_6158075). Looks like IBM likely dumped outdated equipment on the district and wouldn't take it back after the district figured out it was not useful. Yes, the district did try to return the equipment. Also, this district has filed for bankruptcy in the past (more than once?), so I am not clear why they are still carrying so much debt... but then again, I've never understood bankruptcy.
  36. Re:Break their thumbs by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    For one reason or another the computers were never used and no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware.

    I don't understand something. Is there any proof that the computers were ever delivered?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  37. Accountability my... (insert a body part noun) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM has been more than fair. They are owed their money. Mistakes are made, but unless the consquences are paid they will happen again.
    You're making it sound as if a lesson would be learn from this; NEWS FLASH - not by a long shot. Dofus that made the decision to buy the equipment, lose the equipment, have all retired long ago. Nobody in the current administration is even remotely responsible for the fiasco. The current crop of administrators are busy making their own mistakes, to be inherited by the next group of administrators, and the next, and the next...
  38. Actually,.... by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if IBM were smart, they would try to cut a deal with the CA state to buy more goods from them in exchange for forgiveness.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Actually,.... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      IBM doesn't handle the PC desktops and laptops. I am sure much of the school's purchase was exactly that. So what should IBM ask CA to buy? Oh, buy one of our mainframes and we'll 'forgive' the debt?

    2. Re:Actually,.... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

      The should do that so they can get screwed again by a wealthy school district? Do you know where Contra Costa is? It's the land of $500,000 starter / fixer-upper shacks. They can afford to pay their bill.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Actually,.... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Do you know where Contra Costa is? It's the land of $500,000 starter / fixer-upper shacks.

      Actually, they're up to their eyeballs in debt. It's barely possible for them to get enough money to have 'keeping up appearances' bling on their credit.

    4. Re:Actually,.... by MarkAyen · · Score: 1
      Mod +1. I was going to make the same point. I grew up in Contra Costa (Moraga specifically) back when it was a reasonable place to live. The crummy little ranch-style house I grew up in, which my parents sold in 1974 for about $60,000, is not worth (according to zillow.com) about a million dollars.

      I'm sure they can scrape up the money somewhere.

  39. I went to school there by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 5, Informative

    The basic problem is, in 1992, they got a superintendant who was going to revolutionize everything. New schools, new ways of doing things, the works.

    He turned out to be a corrupt bastard, but he disappeared without ever having to pay or atone for anything, and the people who use the schools have been paying for it ever since.

    The school district is broke as hell, and quite honestly, will probably go bankrupt before they pay IBM (if by 'pay' you mean 'pay in the next 50 years').

    All the other comments here seem to be going 'lol pay up already', but it's not that simple. IBM should forgive the debt, and everyone should learn a lesson from this:

    Don't let public institutions pay with credit. The people who make decisions are not held responsible, and thus do not make responsible decisions. They will rip you off, and rip off the people they are supposed to be representing.

    1. Re:I went to school there by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How about not letting governments borrow at all, except in time of war? Oh wait, that's already in the constitutions of the state and federal govt., but is conveniently ignored, since everything is a "National Emergency".
      Bread, circuses, and whatever else paid for with someone else's money (in this case, far in the future) is what you get with a Democracy, which is why the US was founded as a Republic. Funny how this happens in a place run by Democrats.
      No, I say that the line has to be drawn somewhere, and having the shareholders of IBM, or the taxpayers of significantly less prosperous counties (through the state government) bail out ultra-libs who hire flim-flam men and then keep putting off paying the piper is a good place to draw it. Contra Costa County is rich. Raise your sales taxes, raise your property taxes, or have your schools go bankrupt and get taken over by the state, which will fire your activist administrator bloat. I'm sick of the rest of the state subsidizing the bay area, which is the richest part of it.

    2. Re:I went to school there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The basic problem is, in 1992, they got a superintendant who was going to revolutionize everything. New schools, new ways of doing things, the works.

      He turned out to be a corrupt bastard, but he disappeared without ever having to pay or atone for anything, and the people who use the schools have been paying for it ever since.


      So call Dog the Bounty Hunter.

      IBM should forgive the debt, and everyone should learn a lesson from this:

      Why? This isn't the first case of a customer who can't pay. You negotiate, threaten, sue, and settle for a discount.

      Don't let public institutions pay with credit.

      This isn't a problem of a public institution paying with credit. It's a problem of a public institution, ordering something, losing it, and not having the money to pay. Credit has nothing to do with the problem.

      In the real world, if you demand cash on the barrel for every large sale, you are going to lose sales. That is why car dealers offer financing.

    3. Re:I went to school there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then make the elected and appointed officials legally and financially responsible for their decision to incurr debt. Use fines for "negligent public non-service" to pay off all or part of the debt. This would discourages the borrowing of spectacular sums from future generations with little or no thought to whether and how they can repay those sums.

      The hard part is deciding where the line is between a district with financial troubles due to mismanagement versus a district in trouble due to factors outside their control. Or perhaps the *uckup is the responsibility of all the administrations between those that incurred the debt and those responsible for planning its repayment. So fine 'em all I say! Perhaps $10k per year served per board member. Special triple fines to the chairpersons and chiefs!

    4. Re:I went to school there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there are provisions in the state or federal constitutions preventing the government from borrowing except during time of war. Sounds like you've been smoking some crack.

      This issue has nothing to do with partisan stereotypes as you've painted it. It's about a lack of checks and balances which allows *any party* to spend irresponsibly and then avoid paying for the consequences.

      But I do agree that payment for the fiasco ought to be limited to the folks from that county -- especially the administrators of the school district responsible for its budget (past through present).

    5. Re:I went to school there by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      He turned out to be a corrupt bastard, but he disappeared without ever having to pay or atone for anything, and the people who use the schools have been paying for it ever since.
      And yet they haven't paid a single penny on this debt. IBM even agreed to not charge interest, which I'm sure was in the original contract.

      All the other comments here seem to be going 'lol pay up already', but it's not that simple. IBM should forgive the debt, and everyone should learn a lesson from this
      You failed to explain why it isn't that simple. Their other payments are ending which is why their first payments to IBM are beginning now. This is an affluent district that can find many ways to pay IBM, including funding from the county, new taxes, selling bonds, etc. If they decide to declare bankruptcy, then so be it, but get a judge to make it official. We don't need lawmakers begging for money (that's what this really is). And should they declare bankruptcy, their credit rating will go further down the tubes and people will continue to pay for it well into the future.

      Don't let public institutions pay with credit. The people who make decisions are not held responsible, and thus do not make responsible decisions. They will rip you off, and rip off the people they are supposed to be representing.
      This isn't something IBM suddenly decided to do, no business pays for anything upfront. Typically, 60 days is a normal turnaround time for accounts payable, and the bigger the purchase, the longer the payments are spread over. You don't even get your paycheck in advance. While this seems foreign to consumers that pay at the checkout (ignoring credit cards), business is done this way, and the school system would just have given their business to someone else if IBM had crazy terms like that.

      Personally, I'd be on IBM's side if they decided to forgive the debt, but then charged a "high risk credit" fee to the next acquisition done by the school or county. And make the fee for $5 mil plus interest. Considering all the mainframes, enterprise software, and other business critical things IBM sells, it won't be long before they need something that wasn't included in the original maintenance contract and have to pay the piper. I suspect IBM will be kinder than this and forgive the debt as part of a larger contract that is missing many of the normal government discounts.
    6. Re:I went to school there by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      It's not "partisan stereotypes" but the fundamental reason the two parties are called what they are. I agree with you that neither of them have anything except the interests of their party at heart.
      The Democrats, in effect, are just as elitist as the Republicans, and neither are true to the ideals they were founded on, or pronounce. I despise them both.
      On topic: Governments, and the trustees appointed to them, should be held accountable for their actions. Don't bail Contra Costa County out.

    7. Re:I went to school there by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1

      Contra Costa County is rich. Raise your sales taxes, raise your property taxes, or have your schools go bankrupt and get taken over by the state, which will fire your activist administrator bloat. I'm sick of the rest of the state subsidizing the bay area, which is the richest part of it
      You realize this is the WEST Contra Costa County Unified School District, which used to be known as the Richmond Unified School District. If that doesn't ring any bells, suffice to say that no, we aren't that rich. And we did fire our activist administrator bloat. And we did raise property taxes, and probably sales too, but I don't remember.

      Thanks for the flame, though.

    8. Re:I went to school there by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      It's not a flame, but a reasonable response to asking everyone else to bail you out of a mess you created on your own.
      Sorry that Richmond elects the wrong people, who hire crooks. But it sure as heck isn't: IBM's, who by all accounts delivered what was contracted for, at far below market; or the rest of the State of CA's; fault that your school district can't pay its bills.
      Maybe if elections and appointments in your district were based on competency, as opposed to race, you'd be in better shape. Maybe reaping the consequences of ethnic balkanization and race politics will make you all band together, maybe it will tear you apart. The point is, it's YOUR MESS, YOU CLEAN IT UP.

    9. Re:I went to school there by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1

      It's not a flame

      *cough*

      Sorry that Richmond elects the wrong people, who hire crooks


      s/elects/elected in 1992, fifteen years ago. Besides, if IBM never delivered (no one can find the hardware), should the school have to pay? Then wouldn't it be the majority non-Richmond IBM shareholders who elected the crooks?

      Maybe if elections and appointments in your district were based on competency, as opposed to race, you'd be in better shape

      Nooo, you're not flaming. While I can't speak for the entire board, the superintendent is definitely a 60 year old white male from the east coast- I've met him. Unless you were insinuating that there are too many white people, except that complaint is usually phrased more explicitly.

      Maybe reaping the consequences of ethnic balkanization and race politics will make you all band together, maybe it will tear you apart. The point is, it's YOUR MESS, YOU CLEAN IT UP.

      Ahem. It's 'our' mess, fine. So why can't we ask IBM to help us out? RTFA, no one is saying the state should pay, it's just state lawmakers arguing for the WCCUSD.

    10. Re:I went to school there by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      | s/elects/elected in 1992, fifteen years ago.

      So we can just not pay the bonds issued by Carter while he presided over stagflation, and therefore carry double digit interest? Let's tell those bondholders that their return is usury. How about Reagan? Most of those ships he bought are sitting in Suisun bay or sold for scrap.

      | Besides, if IBM never delivered (no one can find the hardware), should the school have to pay?

      This is a red herring. In order for the debt to be valid, IBM had to be able to prove delivery and acceptance, and I'm sure you know that.

      As far as the ethnic composition of the board, it's not the composition, but how and why the people were elected, and their resulting inability to work together. Are you telling me that West CC is not a racially balkanized area where people vote for color of skin (60 year old white dudes have at least their share of buffoons among them) as opposed to competency?

      IBM has already helped you out. And don't tell me that using the bully pulpit of your state reps, one of whom happens to be the pro tem, isn't getting the state involved. As soon as they opened their mouths, they opened the door to IBM "making the state part of the solution".

      As you can see from the overwhelming response here on /. People are sick and tired of paying for other's corruption and incompetence.

    11. Re:I went to school there by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      FYI I did the math. Your liberal version of it may not recognize that deductions on one side of the ledger equal credits on the other, but there is no such thing as a free lunch.
      Especially to government entities. A $5M write-off to IBM is, at the marginal corporate tax rate in CA of 39.4% Federal, and 8.84% state, $2.4M in revenue the government has to get elsewhere. Should the other 49 states have to pony up $1.97M, and the rest of CA $442K, even if IBM bears the rest of the burden of these bufoons?
      I think not.

  40. 2 points by amohat · · Score: 1

    1) I never heard of this "Costa School District". Contra Costa, though is real. Wow. Never thought I'd be shitting on the editors, too. I feel silly.

    2) Perhaps this is the result of some coke-fueled 80's shenanigans, with pushy IBM salesmen and wimpy school administrators. Unless IBM can come up with compelte records of who ordered and signed for and installed what and when, this should be thrown out.

    Surely IBM can't be saying that they don't have complete records! That's their business! Maybe they should have stored it in some sort of trusty mainframe.

    Reminds me of fiascoes of crushing debt of 3rd-world countries. The West had no business cutting deals with the usually inept, often brutal governments in power at the time. Some sort of conscience not "close the deal at any cost" should have won out. And expecting the countries to pay this ill-gotten debt decades after the dictators and idiots have been stripped of their power is galling.

    Which reminds of the stories I used to read of how the Japanese would take out home loans and the banks would contractually expect the children to pay it off once they grew up long after the parents were dead.

    Which reminds me of the "aid relief" the West gave to some Tsunami communities, like irregular down jackets and wool sweaters. They have warehouses of crap they couldn't use, though some mothers tried to cut stuff up to use as diapers. Companies got the credit/tax break all the same.

    Which reminds me of how terrible and pervasive corruption is, and usually the people who pay the price are the ones at the bottom of the ladder. In this case, students.

    I say IBM makes them pay, but actually gives them $5 million of useful services and supplies.

    1. Re:2 points by iPaul · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Interesting point. When I first read the article, I took it to mean no one at the school district was able to locate records. However, I don't think anyone was debating the equipment as purchased. Your post does raise an interesting scenario in mind: An unethical IBM sales rep sells equipment to the district that will never be delivered, because he has colluded with a school official to put in the order (knowing that the district horribly mis-managed it's equipment). They split his commission on the 5 mil. - say 2%. Each walks away with 50k. (33k-ish after taxes). Or, more likely, IBM sold them the equipment. It was purchased. No one wanted to deal with it, so it sat in a warehouse. It may have been AS/400's RS/6000's, or Aptiva PC's, or IBM logo mouse-pads, but school beurocracies are notoriously inefficient. The paperwork got pushed around the school administrative offices until it finally "fell behind a filing cabinet." The boxes of "old computers" were finally moved, thrown away to make room for new football gear, or people learned there were boxes of free computers at some warehouse. In any case - it should not let the school district off the hook. On a loan of 5 million, IBM has been more than generous in not charging interest. At a 5% interest rate that's already more than 5 million in lost interest over 17 years.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
  41. Coming soon to a cinema near you... by antic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, losing the documents and misplacing the hardware. Until now. This summer, one man wages a solo war against confused and incompetent administration in schools. You'll laugh, you'll cry. You'll mostly cry.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  42. Re:Break their thumbs by cetialphav · · Score: 1

    I don't understand something. Is there any proof that the computers were ever delivered?

    I bet IBM has proof. :) It certainly isn't IBM's fault if the school district was disorganized.

  43. Rewarding bad behavior by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lessee, the school district has such lousy financial controls that they can't account for the systems, and they can't pay for them. Typically, the socialist argument is to not hold them accountable. I say bankrupt the district and put some people in who won't let $5M get STOLEN.

    1. Re:Rewarding bad behavior by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      the school district has such lousy financial controls that they can't account for the systems, and they can't pay for them. Typically, the socialist argument is to not hold them accountable. I say bankrupt the district and put some people in who won't let $5M get STOLEN.


      The district already went bankrupt after the time the computers were purchased, and has since that time (as part of the state bailout that allowed it to operate at all) had new management and management controls imposed on it.

      So, um, great idea, except that that was already done 16 years ago. The deferment to 2008 was a result of negotiations on how to address its pre-collapse debt that occurred after the bankruptcy, during the bailout and imposition of the state trustee.

    2. Re:Rewarding bad behavior by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's time to bankrupt them again, and maybe privatize them. Someone has to hold these buffoons accountable. Or maybe the not-so-poor denizens of Contra Costa County can pay their own bills!

    3. Re:Rewarding bad behavior by A+coward+on+a+mouse · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting the rich folks from the part of the county that is shown by the Chamber of Commerce web site to pay for the debts of the other part of the county. Why do you think there are two school districts in the first place?

      I agree, though, those poor school kids, their wage-slave parents, and the underpaid teachers (no COLA in over ten years, baby!) MUST PAY!

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    4. Re:Rewarding bad behavior by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      So IBM's shareholders and/or the rest of the state should?
      I'm not saying the situation doesn't stink, I just think fobbing the responsibility for the actions of a school board that the people chose, supposedly in free and fair elections, off on anyone EXCEPT the people in that district is a rotten precedent, and rewards bad behavior. Maybe, if they feel some financial pain, they will a: vote, and b: pay attention to who they are voting for, noting that when a politician promises something, they plan on having YOU, or your children, pay for it.
      It's about being held accountable for your choices and actions. And "if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice".

  44. Re:Break their thumbs by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    I bet IBM has proof. :) It certainly isn't IBM's fault if the school district was disorganized.

    Given that, why didn't they offer this proof when the newspaper called, thus making the whole thing a moot point?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  45. What IBM really should do by sulimma · · Score: 1

    is make them pay, and then donate the money to a school district in another state.

  46. Need more INFO! by posterlogo · · Score: 1
    Somehow I have little confidence that this school "deserves" its loan forgiven. How can they be so irresponsible as to not keep track of this hardware or any paperwork associated with it? And why does this "oh we can't find the paperwork" crap only come up now rather than all those other times they requested loan deferrment? In the end I guess it would be wise for IBM to let this one slide, in the hopes that it would be good for publicity. But it's not like they make that many low end PCs anymore, so what kind of advertising value are they going to get out of this? I'm not sure any school could afford IBM infrastructure. Maybe the district?


    Mostly I just want more information about this story. Is it reported anywhere else? What kind of computers are we talking about? What was the original value claimed?

    1. Re:Need more INFO! by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Somehow I have little confidence that this school "deserves" its loan forgiven. How can they be so irresponsible as to not keep track of this hardware or any paperwork associated with it?


      Possibly incompetence, which may be why the school district declared bankruptcy and its intent to shut down all operations in 1991, after all or most of the orders at issue had occurred, and is only operating today because of a state bailout that came along with a partial administrative takeover.
  47. Re:Break their thumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that the "paperwork" in question is the internal tracking and auditing that goes with purchase. who and where and when it was allocated for such and such a purpose. This is not the reciept they are speaking of I am sure.

  48. Re:Break their thumbs by empaler · · Score: 1

    First of all, I betcha IBM isn't as sloppy with their paper work.

    Apart from that, the school has negotiated a long-term repayment plan with IBM, indicating that they accept the responsibility.

  49. Hey, What About the Little Guy? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Hey, what about the little guy who can't afford to repay. Is debt forgiveness only for big, important players who can say, "But think of the children!"

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  50. Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    West Contra Costa County School District was so poorly managed, financially, that up until maybe last year, that district was under California State control. I forget the exact title of the person they place in charge of the district, but they manage the books/district until the district is on solid ground, and then turn it back over to the locals. That district also includes many low income neighborhoods. Basically, that district is broke. It doesn't mean they should get a free ride, but the whole story wasn't being told either.

    1. Re:Clarification by kinglink · · Score: 1

      This makes sense until you realize 15 years has passed.

      I want to feel bad for the school but they made a deal with a company and now 15 years after the fact they are acting like they were idiots back then, that they don't have the money, that there's some other problems and it's all valid arguments, however IBM still shouldn't have to give up the entire debt, they are working with them, but we have to realize that just because the school is on the right track doesn't mean they can default on all the debts in the past to fix it.

      Imagine if you sold me your car, how soon after I bought the car would you expect payment? Let's assume you were drunk and we entered into a deal that said in 15 years I'll pay you 1 million dollars. In 15 years wouldn't you expect to start collecting?

  51. Re:Break their thumbs by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see, I'm being too autistic again. I took "no one" in the article to mean they had asked *BOTH* the school district and IBM where the paperwork or hardware was, and that "no one" had any clue.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  52. Fiscal Anononymity: Let's see some names by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    I want to see the names and photos of the people responsible.

    What bites about this and so many other cases is we don't have the names of the people involved. In this case, losing the paperwork for a multi-million dollar purchase, at that, a contract, beggars belief. "Well, who did you see it with last?"

    Whether it's the Costa School District, the RIAA, a retailer or your favorite Government Department, no one steps up to the plate and says "This was my call and if you have a beef with that, take it up with me!" No one pushes them either, since they're counting on similar support when they screw up. At best you'll see companies throwing some arrogant no-name lawyer to read a PR release, while the executives behind the decision drive home safe in the knowledge no one else knows the evil they do. (BTW the RIAA is really four record companies who use the RIAA moniker as their Mr. Hyde persona: EMI, Sony BMG, Universal, Warner. RIAA suing some kid isn't news. SONY suing them would be.

    How about a web site listing unpopular, stupid or evil decisions along with the photos and names of the people responsible?

    1. Re:Fiscal Anononymity: Let's see some names by sampson7 · · Score: 1

      Here you go:

      Walter Marks.

      "Eighteen years ago, computers were just emerging as classroom learning tools promising improved instruction.

      So when Walter Marks, then superintendent of the former Richmond Unified School District, ordered hundreds of IBM computers costing millions, he received praise from all corners.

      But few knew the district was sinking deep into debt and didn't have the money to pay for the machines.

      Now those computers -- like other poor financial decisions made by administrators in the late 1980s -- are coming back to haunt the West Contra Costa Unified School District."

      And:

      "Whether Marks, who made several questionable budget decisions as superintendent, actually had the authority to buy the machines remains unclear, said Fred Basalto, then the associate superintendent of business services. Marks did not return calls for comment."

      http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_5727158

      Now what?

    2. Re:Fiscal Anononymity: Let's see some names by zwizzlemydizzle · · Score: 1

      Read Debt mounts for school district from back in April. It mentions the superintendent that made the purchasing decision.

    3. Re:Fiscal Anononymity: Let's see some names by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      Mod parent informative.

      Good to have a name! Anyone have a photo? Did some googling. Lots of photos here, but not sure if that's another Walter Marks? http://www.collegeofthedesert.edu/Visitors/Marks/i ndex.asp

      Heh. Apparently Marks bought the IBM's Salesman's "Business Partner" sales pitch.

      I'd suggest a web site, brief blurb, photos, blogger comments all paid for by Google Ads.

    4. Re:Fiscal Anononymity: Let's see some names by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The RIAA *don't* sue anyone. Quick multi choice quiz:

      Question 1:
      The single mother who was being sued for alleged file sharing, was the case:
      a. RIAA -v- Andersen
      b. Atlantic Records -v- Andersen?

      Question 2:
      A person called Arellanes, who lives in Texas is being sued for alleged copyright infringement. Is the case:
      a. RIAA -v- Arellanes
      b. Sony -v- Arellanes

      A hint. If you answered A to any of the above, you were wrong. The RIAA doesn't sue anyone. The record companies themselves are doing the actual suing.

  53. the state got theirs but wants IBM to take a loss by Caffeinated+Geek · · Score: 1

    In 1993 the district and IBM negotiated a long-term settlement that said the school district would pay the first of four $1.25 million installments beginning in 2008. Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story.

    If I read this correctly the state waited for the school system to finish paying off a loan from the state before asking IBM to forgive a different loan? Charity starts at home and that goes for California as well. If California is so happy to help the school system out why not refund the loan payments the school system made to the state?

  54. State loans repaid but ignore other debts! by aarggh · · Score: 1

    Unless I misunderstood the story, it seems that the same state authorities that ensured the school made all it's state loan payments, "2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan", now wants IBM to not get their agreed payments? This is somewhat conceited I think. Don't worry about large prior debts, so long as you pay the state what you owe.

    1. Re:State loans repaid but ignore other debts! by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Unless I misunderstood the story, it seems that the same state authorities that ensured the school made all it's state loan payments, "2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan"


      You misunderstood the story.

      The restructuring of the loan occurred in 1993, and was negotiated between the district and IBM. The state was involved because, during the life of the "emergency loan"--essentially a state bailout--a state trustee has been involved in running the WCCUSD, but any state officials around at the time the earlier state loan occurred and its repayment was set weren't the same state officials that are around now. What is not mentioned in the article is that the repayment term on the state emergency loan have since been extended to 2018, and additional special grants have been made to the district. So, no, the "same state officials" have not "ensured the school made all it's state loan payments". By both extending the repayment of the state loan and providing additional special grants specifically to give the district money it missed out on as a direct result of the terms of the original state takeover, the state has eased up on what it demanded from the district.

  55. Standard Government Procedure by Plugh · · Score: 1
    As state monopolies always do sooner or later, the school system in question finds it most expedient to deal with this situation by stealing resources from those who have traded freely with it up to that point.

    I expect this kind of behavior out of socialist states like Venezuela, Brazil, and the People's Republic of California. Which is one of the reasons I emigrated from CA to the Free State of New Hampshire.

    1. Re:Standard Government Procedure by darjen · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There's nothing new at all in this story. This is government's message to industry: if you do business with us, we will rip you off. Same goes for consumers and citizens.

    2. Re:Standard Government Procedure by Plugh · · Score: 1
      This is government's message to industry: if you do business with us, we will rip you off. Same goes for consumers and citizens.

      Yep! I figure if a starry-eyed young Socialist like John Stossel can go from believing that the Government should protest people, to believing that only private enterprise can protect people... well, there may be hope for us.

  56. I attended that school district by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I attended that school district back in the early 90s when these problems were building up. What basically happened from my recollection is the new superintendent of the school district started spending lots of money on courses, equipment and teachers. All good for us students but after a few years of this suddenly the school district was deeply in debt. When we graduated in 1991 we were more concerned that the district would stay open so we could get our diplomas.

    The students in our class got a good deal out of the situation with lots of language classes such as latin, italian, french, etc. The new PS/2 systems from IBM were also great as that was the only way I could access a computer of that capability.

    Personally I think the tax payers in that school district should pay up for their own mistakes.

  57. Can't generate new dollars?!? by azuroff · · Score: 1

    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees," the lawmakers wrote. "Our schools rely solely on limited state and federal assistance to educate our students and every dollar is precious."

    Oh really? It sure feels like our local school district (in CA) is generating new dollars every single time an election rolls around with yet another round of school bond measures. Perhaps the bondholders can be pressured into following IBM's plan - 15-year interest-free loans - so my property taxes can go back down.

  58. Re:Break their thumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they should donate about 10000 copies of Ubuntu Linux. Everybody knows the value of each copy is $699.

  59. Yug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As with all funny money taxes, the money will come from somewhere. Be it from the district's coffers, or state funds for transportation, the money will be paid. That is how politics work. My guess is a committee under budget will pay for it to ensure their next year's budget won't shrink. In any event, the citizens of the state of California (of which I belong) will just add it to our taxes. Either that, or they could relieve IBM of 5 million in tax debt.

  60. West Contra Costa County School District by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Of course, its not Contra Costa County that owes the money, but the West Contra Costa County School District, which does not include the wealthier areas of the county that are responsible for much of the overall statistics the comment quoted by the parent refers to. The area in the WCCUSD has substantially higher poverty and lower average incomes than Contra Costa County as a whole.

  61. Re:Break their thumbs by jythie · · Score: 1

    The big question I would add to this.. who ended up with them?

    If no one can find the paperwork or hardware, it would not surprise me if someone had used the schools purchasing system to resell some hardware for lining their own pockets.

    So I am curious why they are not doing a bit of a legal investigation here. As far as we know, it could have been the IBM sale's rep who was involved.

  62. California Counties in the 80's by InsurgentGeek · · Score: 1

    I actually worked with a number of counties in California in the mid to late 80's. At the time I worked for a large systems integration vendor that was implementing a statewide system that impacted each of the counties.

    It was not a pretty sight. While the vast majority of county employees were *trying* hard to do a good job - their working with the large hardware vendors was like shooting fish in a barrel, clubbing baby seals ... pick your metaphor. These hardware vendors were slick, quick talking and promised the world. This was almost 20 years ago and technology decisions were much more decentralized and the buyers were *much* less sophisticated.

    I saw loading docks full of "client server systems". When we asked what they were going to be used for the answer was "client server systems" - they were purchased with literally no idea of what was going to run on them or who was going to run it. When talking to the IBM guys their general attitude was "Can you believe it? Isn't life great!".

    I agree that stupid decisions were made here. I am also certain that this is at least partly the responsibility of the vendor for taking advantage of a naive buyer or buyers.

    1. Re:California Counties in the 80's by iPaul · · Score: 1

      I don't think that should get you a pass on the purchasing decisions you make. For one thing it's just bad business. If word gets around you can't or won't pay debts, vendors start asking for escrow and cash-up-front deals. Paying the debt would help put what happened 17 years ago to rest. It would be tough, but over the long haul it would help the trustworthiness and credit rating of the district.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
    2. Re:California Counties in the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or the 90s, for that matter. Well, yeah this happens. Computers supposedly were to revolutionize education -- we need the computers for the kids. After all, they can't learn to read and write and cipher without them. All it was was technology with not a thought about how it was to be used.

      Even in cases where the computers were not ripped off, but actually got installed and hooked up to the information superhighway, what we have now are "media center" personnel trying to keep kids from going to MySpace or game sites. Kids are now wasting time putting together Keynote or Powerpoint projects rather than actually writing a paper on a subject. I'm with Clifford Stoll on this -- computers don't belong in schools -- I'm serious. Change the "media center" back into a library.

      Even if those computers had never been lost/stolen, they would be junk now. It's such a waste -- how many books could have been purchased for $5 million and still be usable today?

  63. TEACHER.... OH PICK ME!!!! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    So, by that vain I can forget about the RIAA and MPAA? I didn't have a job when I downloaded those torrents, and had no way of generating the income needed to enjoy the works I downloaded. Hey, I'm not a recording industry who can raise millions in a week!

    The lesson from this school system is: It's okay to steal if you don't have a job.

  64. A tale of two counties by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not entirely true. This *is* the story of an impoverished school district begging for debt relief from a corporation. (I won't comment if their request is justified or not).

    Contra Costa County is broken up into Multiple School Districts. This story is about the West Contra Costa School District, which serves communities such as Richmond & San Pablo. I don't know specifics off the top of my head, but it is one of the poorest school districts in California.

    Contra Costa County is a tale of two counties. Eastern Contra Costa County is as you described, with many wealthy suburbs, wealthy inhabitants and well-funded schools. This is the image that Contra Costa County would like to promote on it's website.

    Western Contra Costa County is much poorer, with poorly funded schools & high crime rates. Richmond has a disturbing level of corruption in the government. Compare these two cities:

        * RichmondWalnut CreekAbout 1.7% of families and 3.7% of the population were below the poverty line

    I travel in both areas of Contra Costa Country regularly, and I'm always amazed at the difference. Walnut Creek has beautiful, clean schools located close to grass-covered golden hills. Many Richmond schools have a ton of graffiti, broken windows, boarded-up buildings, etc. Several times a year, schools in the parts of the Western Contra Costa County School district go into 'lockdown' mode due to leaks at the nearby chemical plants or oil refineries. Drive by shootings happen near the schools. In Richmond, you can hear gunshots just about every night.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  65. IBM could at least help Suse/Novell Linux by mazphil57 · · Score: 1

    As a condition for "forgiving" this debt, this school district should have to implement the Microsoft-approved IBM/Suse/Novell version of Linux (this is a great punishment, it is very ancient compared to modern Linux!).

  66. Since when is the government a charity? by nsayer · · Score: 1

    I have for a long time failed to understand the concept behind school fundraising (I'm not talking about fundraising for extracurricular activities. I'm talking about bake sales to buy library books and the like for public schools). The school district is part of the government. It is funded by taxes. I'm a silicon valley homeowner, and that means I pay an awful lot of taxes that are aimed in the direction of various local school districts (I'm even willing to cede that I get a benefit from it despite having no kids). If there was a need for more money for my local school, I'm pretty sure my first reaction would be to find out where all the money is going, not find ways to throw more money at it.

  67. Let's think about this a minute by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Funny

    The school owes IBM money and California farmers are paying higher prices for farm labor because of the border crack down. I say have the school send all the kids out to harvest lettuce and have their wages go to pay back IBM. They even have school buses to drive them out to the fields. Might have to chain them together so they don't wander off and get lost and we could make their parents buy them little orange jumpsuits so we could spot them if they tried running off.

    The farmers get cheap labor, IBM gets its money and the kids all learn to swing a lettuce knife with deadly accuracy before they get to high school. Okay, a few of them will lose fingers, maybe hack a little arm off. Bo-ho liberal whiners. Here's a bandaid. It's a win-win-win for everyone.

    If it works out we could start renting them out to companies doing asbestos remediation, hauling trash, put them to work in shoe factories and get those back in the US again! Then we could take all that money they're making and role back the property taxes for all us old people.

    This is brilliant! Brilliant I tell ya!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Let's think about this a minute by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      Who modded this troll interesting?
      The only way this happens is if the school board of wealthy Contra Costa County continues to fob its financial responsibilities off on everyone except the poeple really responsible: the taxpayers/voters of Contra Costa. Maybe, if they actually have to pay up, they won't elect such crooks to the school board next time.

    2. Re:Let's think about this a minute by genglish · · Score: 1

      Troll!? I think it's a modest proposal and brilliant to boot.

  68. IBM Sells LOADS of things by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    service, Unix boxes, mainframes, etc. PCs were but one small part.

    If they were really smart, they would create a new form of diskless workstations using PowerPC and create a school and office distro. Then have the district AND state buy X number of them. Getting CA to buy 100 million worth of true low-costs network computer set-ups (combined with servers) is a VERY good use of that money. Think of it as Marketing costs.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  69. Just forget it! by sc0ob5 · · Score: 1

    Thats what I'll say to my creditors when they come a knocking. Imagine the lost income that $5 million could have produced over 15 years. I tell you what, it's pretty obvious why people are in so much debt when the schools can't even manage their own, what are they supposed to teach the students, the future debt holders of tomorrow? Just buy buy buy and then worry about the implications later. Take 'em to court IBM. That's what I'd want you to do if I was a shareholder, in fact I'd see it as your duty to me.

  70. You're new to this, aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you are...

    What they most likely will do is offer California Republic Inc to pay an advance of 30 million for consulting services
    with the obligation to render them becoming void after say five years and the gentleman understanding not to call IBM on the
    contract.

  71. State representatives by lelitsch · · Score: 1

    I live in Contra Costa and given the tax base here, the whole idea that the school district needs charity instead of a state or federal supervisor and some honest auditing is just ludicrous.

    What I don't get is how Loni Hancock and Don Perata come into play. The last time I checked, both Berkeley and Oakland are part of Alameda County, not Contra Costa. Now if anyone wants to argue that downtown Oakland and Richmond schools are ripe for charitable donations, I'd be all for it.

    1. Re:State representatives by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I live in Contra Costa and given the tax base here, the whole idea that the school district needs charity instead of a state or federal supervisor and some honest auditing is just ludicrous.


      West Contra Costa Unified (Richmond, largely) doesn't have the same tax base as Contra Costa County more generally. Richmond isn't Walnut Creek. And WCCUSD has a state supervisor, and will continue to until at least 2018.

      What I don't get is how Loni Hancock and Don Perata come into play. The last time I checked, both Berkeley and Oakland are part of Alameda County, not Contra Costa. Now if anyone wants to argue that downtown Oakland and Richmond schools are ripe for charitable donations, I'd be all for it.


      "Richmond schools" are WCCUSD, which was formed from the consolidation of the Richmond Unified School District and other neighboring school districts (similarly troubled, IIRC). SoI think your argument against WCCUSD getting charity and for "Richmond schools" getting charity is a bit confused.

      That being said, I imagine that Alameda County representatives in the legislature are at least somewhat interested in going to bat to get seek voluntary forgiveness of loans by troubled districts like WCCUSD in part because Oakland Unified is in a similar overall position to WCCUSD, also operating under state supervision as it repays an emergency loan and establishes state mandate fiscal controls to prevent recurrence of the problems that put it into crisis in the first place.

  72. THEN QUIT RAISING MY FSCKING TAXES! by swb · · Score: 1

    our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees

    Gee, why do my taxes go up whenever the school board wants my money?

    Not only does the school district have the ability to raise new money, they have the ability to do so with the full force of the law.

  73. Forgiving A Debt by l0rd.47hl0n · · Score: 0

    That's just great ... The Contra Costa school wants IBM to forgive a $5,000,000.00 debt from the 80's - 90's, but trying to get my credit union to forgive the remainder (~$500.00) of a $1,500.00 loan I've defaulted on is near impossible. In fact, they said, "No." Wonderful. Again, as always, it's the little people that pay. My income last year was less than $6,000.00. Yes, you read that correctly. I've lived below the poverty level here in the great state of Maine for two years running now. You'd think the local credit union in Lewiston would forgive that balance under this extenuating circumstance. Instead, they had a judge place a lein against my POS 1991 truck, which is rusting away as I type, so that should I sell it (book value is currently $675.00) they get their money. What a great place to live.

  74. Re:Break their thumbs by cetialphav · · Score: 1

    why didn't they offer this proof when the newspaper called

    The article never stated that they tried and failed to get proof from IBM. I read it that the school district's administration can find no paperwork. If IBM has no proof, then the school board is golden. All they have to do is refuse to pay and force IBM into court to prove its case. IBM did not become a multi billion dollar company by losing the paperwork on a $5 million dollar deal. IBM will have the contract, the purchase orders, the delivery manifest, everything.

  75. Re:Break their thumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I'm sketchy on the history but there was some kind of district merger cluster fuck in 1990. The school district went bankrupt and had something like $50m in debts.

    I have no idea how it ended up that way, it's in norcal, not an area that is known for lacking money exactly.

    So when you're place of employment is going tits up, it's not uncommon for the inmates to start taking more liberties. It's not right and it doesn't help the situation but we already know that this school district didn't have the best or most ethical management. I know a guy who took something like $50k in networking hardware when his ISP employer started to die, he just packed up hardware and took it home. I wouldn't at all be surprised if teachers and administrators all got new computers at home in 1990ish when their paychecks started becoming less reliable.

    I'm guessing test scores went up and drug use among students went down during that time too and they produced a lot of lawyers and doctors and senators during that time too.

    if you're local school districts cannot manage money folks, bitch and get involved before it's too late. It's not pretty when they bankrupt. Basically, if they cannot afford something, make sure it is really damn necessary before they take out a loan on it, if they cannot save up money to afford a new building, how are they going to afford the loan? A school with old equipment, buildings, and no cable TV is WAY better than no school or a bankrupt school. One district in my state bankrupted and teachers just abandoned their jobs... Kids showed up but there were no teachers.

  76. show me the invoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see the invoice for the original equipment. Might it have been $1 million worth of end of life hardware and $4 million worth of OS/2 and DB2 licenses?

  77. Sell Debt to Loanshark by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Let someone willing to take the negative publicity deal with the school district.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  78. Contra Costa did have the computers by pkinetics · · Score: 1

    Since everyone is asking if there is proof that CC even had the computers: ----------------- http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_5727158 "I think they were out of date before (Marks) even decided to buy them," Basalto said. "Every one of them was obsolete; they were absolutely useless." Where the computers ended up also is a mystery. Basalto recalls that some were installed in schools, but some sat in warehouses, possibly never turned on. The district tried to return some of the computers, said Ruth Vedovelli, West Contra Costa school district's current finance chief. IBM refused to take them back, leading to a years-long fight that also included battles over the actual cost. Negotiations often got ugly, with Fred Stewart, the state trustee appointed to oversee the district's finances after it went into debt in 1990, often getting into shouting matches with IBM representatives, says Herb Cole, Marks' successor. "He said, 'We can't pay you, so if you want them, come and get them,'" Cole said, adding that Stewart threatened to put the computers on the curb. "He was tough as nails with them at the time." ----------------- So the computers were received. Judging from the timing, its no surprise that the computers were obsolete with a few years. How many schools bought top of the line machines trying to stay on par with obsolecense back in the late 80s? Figure 2 or more years of bickering back and forth with IBM, hitting bankruptcy, the systems taking up needed space in a warehouse, begging for money from the state, etc. The computers were probably put up for auction when they went into bankruptcy. Or donated to take a deduction / contribution somewhere. Or just flat out disposed / gotten rid of to get rid of the storage cost.

  79. I wonder what the Back story by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    really is? Every school district that I have had the "pleasure" of working with has had some form of financial fuck up to deal with. Whether it was the head of the district awarding huge networking contracts to next door neighbors, bribery, large scale theft, stupid investments in overpriced under performing unneeded software/hardware or certain OS manufactures throwing their weight around ( see previous statement). There NEVER EVER seems to be any punishment or accountability for the FUCKING waste of money. And what do we get? Morons graduated that can't spell comment let alone put any meaningful ones in their code, but goto that they can spell.

    But I know lets just raise a bond or property taxes some more and piss more money down the rat hole that has become the American public education system.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  80. Actually by smiltee · · Score: 0

    IBM could release the district from the debt at these conditions: 1. Use only IBM software/hardware 2. Pay cash only 3. Public detailed reports about IT investments

    --
    Blame Canada!
  81. Socialist argument? by zoftie · · Score: 1

    I think IBM shouldn't simply forgive the debt and at least pester someone else, such way that schools funding will not be jeopardized. Given the school's bookkeeping practices should be given a hard look and thorough evaluation, so such thing doesn't happen again.

    Schooling is one of the foundations of the society. Of course this is only one school, IBM shouldn't make precedent, that it is ok to bankrupt schools if they lead shoddy accounting practices. The school was a bad customer, but there is more to the school then a purchaser of electronic hardware bits. It is responsible for the future of the nation.

    IBM should champion the change, forcing a retrofit to such shoddy accounting practices, not try collect money any way possible.
    imo,
    p

  82. So if I don't use by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

    So if I don't use my computer I could get my pay forgiven? Nice!

    --
    ghostbar page.
  83. Not even in time of war! by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

    If you grant the government the power to borrow or inflate only in time of war, you'll get perpetual war. And if it's not a war against other nations, it will be a war against some social problem, or maybe terrorism or something. Hey, wait a minute...

    --
    That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    1. Re:Not even in time of war! by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      That was the point I was making, in a poorly articulated snide way.

  84. should have sought forgiveness behind the scenes by boguslinks · · Score: 1

    If Contra Costra really wanted to try to weasel out of this, they should have tried to do it quietly behind the scenes, because for IBM to forgive this debt so publicly would cause many other customer of IBM to smell weakness and try the same move.

  85. Simple Solution by Trojan35 · · Score: 1

    Here's the problem, if IBM doesn't forgive the debt, they look like jerks. They need to turn this into a PR tool. Don't forgive the debt, but promise that upon payment it will be distributed amongst the top 10 most improved public schools in the state.

    They're not profiting off of this, so they're the good guys. Plus, they teach that school district that the residents need to care about their local government and school officials.

  86. I tried that.... by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    i tried to explain to California that i hate them and moved to a much better state, so stop sending me registration tax bills for cars that not only don't i own any more (its amazing what $250,000 in liquid assets feels like) and registered the week i got into the new state.

    but even tho i don't need "forgiveness" - i'd take it all the same.

    i wonder if i'll get it?

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  87. Why the county is broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free sex change and pro-gay mental counseling for all county workers on taxpayers money. Illegal aliens welcome and we give you free (oxymoron) taxpayer funded health care. Military not welcome because we hate George Bush with such a passion that we don't give a shit if the military goal in the middle east is good for the long term security of America. No school military recruitment, no Blue Angels flying overhead bringing in $200k extra revenue. No pledge of allegiance in our schools. We pledge compliance to the UN and Pelosi.

    Regardless of religious beliefs, your personal opinion does not matter if you work for the county. You will be fired for saying that gays don't fit within Darwin theories. We don't care if the sight of two ugly men kissing in the hallway shrivels your sphincter naturally. Everyone knows that Gays magically procreate and its not mental. Nature likes a vaccum and there is a gay gene yet to be found.

    Fuck the Bay area. Look for the Navy to close shop just like the Army did. IBM, make those idiots pay. You owe it to your shareholders.

    Ex-Bay straight resident who was tired of all the pro-homo, anti-family nonsense (no I don't hate, I just beleive in science and common sense).

  88. Hey, it works in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that being said, I still think that the district should pay the debt. The question is, where will the money come from?

    Organ farming?

    From the school board, of course.

  89. IBM can look like heroes by gelfling · · Score: 1

    And since we're on year five of no increases and shipping as many jobs as possible out of the country, the 5 mil will get split among the top execs as yet more performance bonuses.

    Sam Palmisano paid himself $37 million dollars last year. Let him eat the loss personally if he wants to look like a hero.

  90. Now the rest get screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah great idea. The state wastes money on something it never uses (no surprise there), now they want IBM to write it off, costing federal taxes, which then gets paid by me.

    fuckers

  91. ONLY 15 years!? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    I've been at my job for 20 years, I remember things we purchased back in 1987, I bet if they TRIED they could find people who remember the what happened with the purchase 15 years back (and being it was for $5 million dollars I would think most people would have no problem with something that big.)

    Who cares if it is a new board, they signed on knowing they'd have to handle situations like this, I think as a constituent I would want a better answer from them besides, "um, we can't find the paperwork or what happened to those computers."

    My last rant, (being as I work for a state/federal funded non-profit) where were the auditors on this in the last 14 years? NPs go though an annual audit by CPAs, even moreso with the funding sources they have. If they 'lost' the $5 million of equipment somewhere along those lines, would it not have shown up somewhere on the books? Fixed Assets? Somewhere?

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  92. I have heard the opposite is true by Degrees · · Score: 3, Informative
    Something that had been hashed out in civil court was the concept of "innocent third party" - this being the shipper. If you and your vendor are in a pissing match, it doesn't become the shipping company's problem. Two parts to it: when the shipper shows up, you have to accept it. Period. The shipper is not your own private storage rental; he/she uses their trucks to make a living. Were the recipient to refuse to accept, then the shipper's truck is not empty for their next customer (and he/she didn't get paid to haul the goods a second time to storage while you and your vendor finish the pissing match). The other part is that someone has to call up the shipper and place an order for shipment back to the vendor's warehouse. Whomever places the order is on the hook for shipment costs (unless other arrangements have been made. If you are in a pissing match, you'd better get that in writing).

    The upshot is that the shipper has the right to unload the goods on your sidewalk and walk away if you are being difficult. Obviously, they'd do all sorts of CYA stuff to document their actions - and this sort of ultimate action is never good for business. But in the end, the innocent third party has the right to walk away without burden (providing the shipping order doesn't place restrictions on the delivery. "Must be kept frozen" overrides "I waited five whole minutes for them to empty the freezer and then dropped the goods on the burning sidewalk."

    It may be that you legally have the right to return the goods. But, you need to be careful about who has possession the goods, and have proof of transfer of possession.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    1. Re:I have heard the opposite is true by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Two parts to it: when the shipper shows up, you have to accept it. Period. That's just plain wrong. In fact, many states (and regions) have explicit legislation that allows deliveries to be refused and details the coint

      Organizations that have strict security policies (where deliveries must be confirmed in advance) often point blank refusing entry to the premises at the gate if an order (so anything that might be left, would have to be illegally dumped on the street, and delivery company would not only still be responsible for it, they'd be open to prosecution by the local authority). You can choose to do the same as a private citizen (though it's not always practical).

      If delivery is refused (and the only legal options you have are to accept or refuse - in most place you don't have the right to inspect it first) then it goes back to the sender, and legal obligation of the private delivery company is fulfilled. They are as liable as an airline or shipping company is when it comes to internationally shipped goods (or people) - if delivery (or entry) is refused, the carrier is liable to return them, at their initial expense (and it's up to them to try and re-coup expenses incurred from their customer, who can in turn hold the recipient accountable if it's the recipient who's in the wrong).

      The upshot is that the shipper has the right to unload the goods on your sidewalk and walk away if you are being difficult. Sidewalks are public property and dumping goods on it would be a criminal offense pretty much everywhere (and likely break more than one bylaw - e.g. causing an obstruction). They would not be immune from criminal prosecution if they'd dumped something you didn't order in front of your house, so no, they wouldn't have the right to do that (they still *could*, but they'd be committing a criminal offense nonetheless). It's not likely they'd ever be charged of course (unless they were dumping huge amounts of stuff, e.g. a delivery from a builders yard), you could make life difficult for them and report them to the local authority though.

      If it is on your private properly in some states you can quite legally physically attempt to remove the person trying to unload goods on to your property if you've explicitly told them you want them to leave, and you are permitted to use reasonable force to get them to comply if they refuse to leave when instructed (which even extends to pulling a gun on them, in some southern states) as it's straightforward trespass (obviously that does not apply everywhere however, as it's not a universally recognized concept).
    2. Re:I have heard the opposite is true by Degrees · · Score: 1
      Certainly, the recipient has the right at the time of placing the order to put restrictions on the delivery. For example, almost all restaurants tell their supplier to put a restriction on the delivery: do not deliver between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM. Within those predefined restrictions, the shipper has to comply. Your high-security scenario is another example. But that doesn't mean that just because you are pissed at your supplier that you can refuse delivery. You ordered it and the innocent third party delivered it. What right do you have to burden the innocent third party with the expense of shipping it back?

      If you didn't order it in the first place, then sure, you do have right of refusal.

      But if you claim that you didn't order it, you send it back, your pissing match goes to court, and it is proven that you did place the order - then not only are you on the hook for shipment costs both directions, but you are also on the hook for the lost business and damaged reputation the shipper incurred because his truck that was supposed to be empty, wasn't, because you felt like jerking the shipper around.

      Note that the shipper's contract is with the supplier. The supplier is paying the shipper for the service. If the supplier tells the shipper to unload on your dock or parking lot, or even outside your front door, then the shipper has that right. If you have a problem with that, you can hire your own shipper to send the goods back ASAP. Heck, you can hire the shipper that is doing the initial delivery, if he/she is willing to take the job. But you can't force him/her into your own little war with a supplier you decide to fight.

      I was told that this whole thing came to a head when a piano store ordered a piano but then figured out they couldn't afford to put it in their inventory. They tried to get the supplier to stop shipment, and the supplier refused. When the truck arrived, the store owner tried to refuse the shipment. The shipper said "I have an order to deliver this piano, and I'm going to deliver it!" The store owner was supposed to supply the special forklift to bring the piano off the truck gently - but he refused. So the shipper just slid the piano off the back of his truck and drove off (yes, at some point there was less sliding / more ka-whumping). The store owner then claimed the improper delivery damaged the piano. The court found in favor of the innocent third party: the shipper. Just because the piano store owner and piano supplier were fighting didn't mean the store owner had the right to piss all over the shipper.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  93. GAAP by Degrees · · Score: 1
    I believe that under GAAP, they have to forgive the debt to take the write-off. Until then, the 5 million dollars actually stays on the books as an asset "Accounts Receivable".

    I wonder if the Contra Costa School District wrote off the depreciation of this capital equipment over the ten years?

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    1. Re:GAAP by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Contra Costa School District wrote off the depreciation of this capital equipment over the ten years?
       
      I don't think school districts pay taxes, so I doubt that's relevant.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:GAAP by Degrees · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I don't know. I know that we (County departments) do have to pay sales tax. I'm sure that we don't pay income tax, but I think we may have to pay property tax. We'd end up paying it to ourselves, so that may be a moot point.

      Depreciation is really just a part of computing the total value of assets an organization holds. It happens to also be a tax write-off, but really all you are computing is how much your gear would be worth if you sold it. Just because an organization bought a $5,000 PC in 1988 doesn't mean they have $5,000 of value sitting on a shelf somewhere in 2007. My point is, I think the school district still has to follow the accounting rules, and I wonder if they included the $5 million of PC's in those rules. That would bolster IBM's case that goods were delivered and should therefor be paid for.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  94. Misleading Info by Chaset · · Score: 1

    People who modded this informative didn't do their research. Although it's true CCC as a whole is a fairly wealthy area, the article in question appears to be talking about WCCCSD, in areas like Richmond. There is a Night/Day difference between, say Lafayette/Moraga/Orinda and Richmond. Kids can play in the streets past dark in the former, I'm afraid to walk the streets at night in the latter. I also infer from several other comments that the WCCCSD was mismanaged years ago. So please, stop with the "this is a rich disctrict that can afford to pay" comments based on information on the county as a whole. It's a non-sequitur.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  95. Which implies... by patio11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... that $3 million of the $5 million that the school district absconded with is being taken from the pockets of retired or soon-to-be-retired working Americans. (Sorry, old rhetorical trick I picked up in college to deflate the balloons of folks who liked to make every issue into The Class Struggle. Most billion dollar companies, once you trace through the intermediaries like pensions and mutual funds, as a series of thousand dollar chunks. Many of the owners or beneficiaries of these chunks would not strike you as being very wealthy, or even as being investors, if you were to bump into them in the checkout at the supermarket.)

    1. Re:Which implies... by greed · · Score: 1

      It does nothing of the kind. Unless those stocks were purchased from IBM itself, it is the previous holder of the stock that received the money. After IBM sells the stock, during an IPO or a re-sale following a buy-back, they get nothing from increase in share price (and lose nothing from decreases). Except for how people feel about the company, which is critical if they do decide to issue more shares.

  96. School funding by Degrees · · Score: 1
    I don't if they have comparable data on the Contra Costa County web site; but, in my County, we have this link: Where Tulare County Property Taxes Go

    Notice who gets the largest chunk.

    Obviously, a County can fund things however they want. But I'd be surprised if the ratio was 20% different.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  97. Re:Break their thumbs by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    IBM knows where they delivered the equipment... IBM doesn't know what happened to it after it was delivered.

  98. Incompetance, corruption! by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1
    We are - quite clearly - reading about a completely failed state!

    Send in the National Guard followed by the Marines to set up an interim military administration. Then call on the UN to supervise elections. Anybody else know a better way to clean up this unbelievable mess?

  99. Article I Section 8 by westlake · · Score: 1
    How about not letting governments borrow at all, except in time of war? Oh wait, that's already in the constitutions of the state and federal govt., but is conveniently ignored, since everything is a "National Emergency".

    Absolute nonsense:

    The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

    To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

    U.S. Constitution: Article I

    1. Re:Article I Section 8 by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong on the US constitution, but CA has a balanced budget requirement, which has been honored more in the breach than the observance lately.

  100. Time to pay the piper by GrEp · · Score: 1

    IBM should just haul them into court. If the school district had such bad financial problems why did it enter into a contract with big blue? Not only would the bankruptcy case serve as a warning to school districts that buy computers instead of teachers, it would also unleash the supena power of the court to get to the bottom of who made the contract and what happened to the machines.

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
  101. IBM, cut a deal they can't refuse. Linux,OSS,ODF.. by Locutus · · Score: 1

    and make sure the deal involves Linux and OSS. They may go kicking and screaming but in 2-3 years, they'll thank you and probably buy IBM services with the extra cash saved from all the OS and apps licensing fees they would not be sending to Microsoft. There's a win for ODF in there too.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  102. Re:Break their thumbs by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    That's not really that relevant. By asking IBM to convert the debt into a "gift", they are acknowledging the debt.

    It's bullshit that the school district would make a public display that puts IBM in a bad light for gross, possibly criminal mismanagement on their part. In New York, school administrators were caught stealing millions from districts once the State Comptroller was given the authority to audit the books.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  103. But corporations are evil! by dafing · · Score: 1
    Ha, Im pretty sick of this kind of "just give them the money, after all, last year you made XX million" attitude.

    Here in New Zealand, I notice it often. A Samoan family moved here 7 years ago, the mother was a school teacher and she got sick, the family of 4+ was quite "hard up" and with just one income earner the bills stacked up. The mother was on a respirator, at home, and the power company turned off the power on them, they owed about NZD$160 dollars at the point with more than $400 to be paid back within a month. The mother died and they say its because they didnt have power.

    The hospital that gave the woman the equipment said that she wouldnt need it 24/7, if she was in such bad health she would have still been in hospital. They said how she would have needed it less than 2 hours a day if at all. The never gave any more news interviews about that fact again.

    There have been all sorts of protests and complaints, petitions etc filed against the power company. There were some calling the contractor who cut the power cable a murderer and that he should do time.

    Our Prime Minister visited, the power company CEOS gave over ten thousand dollars towards the funeral, which the family wasnt going to use for the funeral, new car or something no doubt on the way, and theres been a huge uproar about "evil companies just caring about profit". I hope this doesnt happen for IBM on this issue, they deserve to be paid no matter how well off they are.

    Now the power company has sent out letters to all its customers saying "we are sorry and we are changing our policies, if you are about to have your power turned off please ring this number" and talk of how companies will be regulated to make them give the poor-er people so much cheap power a month etc. Its just crazy.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  104. Re:Break their thumbs by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

    Considering typical bureaucratic behavior, they probably sat in a warehouse while different administrators argued over how to deploy them, until they were forgotten and obsolete.

  105. IBM already did them a favor by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM has already done the school district a favor by not selling their debt to a vulture credit company that would be way more heinous in how it dealt with the district. Normally when loans like this start taking longer than usual to get their money, companies like IBM write off the debt and sell it to vulture funds for pennies on the dollar, and then these vulture funds turn around and gauge the debtors for as much as they can get.

    So the fact that IBM did NOT do this means they have a heart. Don't be stupid and keep on asking for more. IBM is a business, and if they let this customer go, they would simply have more problems in the future.

    1. Re:IBM already did them a favor by tweek · · Score: 1

      Not only that but if you notice in the article, IBM hasn't been charging interest.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:IBM already did them a favor by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not how it works on this scale.
      Yeah, when you don't pay your credit card* they do it to you.

      Besides, id they did sell it to a collector, the school could probably get it paid off for 25 cents on the dollar. As soon as they considered charging a penny in interest, they would gt a call from several lawmakers, who won't forget next time a bill comes up to limit collections.

      *Royal you, not specifically you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:IBM already did them a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This IS how it works, even with commercial contracts. I have seen contracts this size go to collections. Look at all the hardware and software that was purchased in the dot-bomb era. Commercial credit is every bit as risky (sometimes more) than consumer credit. It's nothing short of a miracle that the city's credit rating has not been trashed.

      I'm slightly surprised that a $5 million purchase was made without a bond issue. The bill would have been paid immediately and the only issue would be repayment of principal and interest to the bondholders. Then again, getting bond money is one thing and spending it for the specified purpose is something else again. The concept is "misappropriation of funds", but it's not illegal by itself.

  106. Hey by TheLink · · Score: 1

    There is mercy and there is justice. And there is ridiculous.

    The next time I order stuff from IBM it's fine for me to lose the stuff and then get 15 years to pay back, and in the end not have to pay at all?

    Wow that's nice.

    OK who signed receipt of the hardware? If there's official documentation proving that a valid person from the school took receipt of the goods, then the school should get the pain.

    If it's just some school-kid's signature, then too bad IBM ;).

    --
    1. Re:Hey by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Are you a school? then no, you won't get out of it...oh Wait, you can use bankruptcy to get out of it. hmm.. Not a viable option for the school.

      Snide comments aside, To my mind there is nothing wrong wit going to IBM and presenting this idea.

      IBM is in an interesting situation. Say no, and possible never get the money. They have no practical way to recoup. The only way they do have makes them look very very bad. Suing a school will not go well for IBM's PR.

      Declare it a loss and at least get the write off.
      Possible make some friends that can help out next time a major system needs changing.

      This all roots down to one thing: Schools need to have their finance completely open.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  107. Wow what a contrast! by TommyBear · · Score: 1

    What I find so curious about this, is government asking a business to go easy on a school. In Australia, because we have government run schools, the government would be the one to purchase the computer equipment and therefore the school would be left to, well, teach! Instead of being distracted by huge bills hanging over their heads and potentially compromising the quality of the tuition given to students.

    You guys really need to stop fearing the services that could be possibly provided by your governments, like education, health cover (not insurance), but free health etc.

    And before you go on the whole anti-socialist rant etc, remember that it is not free, in fact you are paying for it with your taxes, you should ask yourself, what exactly you pay taxes for, if not to make sure stuff like this doesn't happen. Our system is similar to that of Britain, Canada, France and others.

  108. Exactly... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    The 925 kind of has the "soulless suburban sprawl" thing going on... at least once you get past Lafayette anyway. To this day, I'm still not sure when and where exactly I'm in Walnut Creek vs. Pleasant Hill vs. Concord vs. Martinez. It's just a little bit TOO "perfect". It actually kind of creeps me out a little bit, especially at night. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's a hellmouth under there somewhere.

    But it's definitely affluent... VERY affluent. This isn't East Oakland we're talking about here.

    Not that they deserve to be ripped off though, just for being wealthy... nor even for being on the wrong side of the "Real City Folk" vs. "Bridge and Tunnelers" rivalry. (Funny thing is... quite a lot of people I know who LIVE in CC have a 415 number for their cell. For the kids, it's trendy. For business types.. it's the difference between "415 == San Francisco" and "925 == whereTheFuckIsThat?".)

    But it sure doesn't look like IBM is the bad guy here. In fact, they've been *more* than generous with the terms of repayment.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  109. Re:Break their thumbs by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM would have no need to prove they delivered anything. They already have a settlement/agreement to make repayment. As such the school district has already admitted that they owe IBM $5 million. It's too late to start arguing that they never received the goods.

  110. omg haha thats my old school district!! by Romxero · · Score: 1

    To tell you the truth Contra Costa County sucks!! My mom worked for the college district here too and all I can say is those computers where there at one point and somehow they all disapeared... lol yeah the employees and officials were snatching them, hell I snagged some parts later on too. I remember them in the classrooms at one point, and then they were gone and replaced with Imacs. Later mostly dells came in mixed with old Imacs, those ibm comps are good as gone. Alot of them stolen and most in storage somewhere or sold over seas.

  111. Wasting the cash... by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    It just occured to me now that $5Million if written off allows a lot of people "off the hook" but on the other hand, can you imagine how many QUALITY linux/FOSS software coders that money could buy. I'm not looking to be a troll but it could benefit a lot more people than some school district that wants to flop on a contract.

    As to the other question, some tech guy prolly has all these 486s in his shed ;)

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
  112. The moral behind the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good. Schoold should teach children that begging actually works. No need to pay the debts nomatter how high they are. Thought it seems difficult to grasp, it can be taught easily by example.

  113. Unless IBM find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they DIDN'T send the computers or that they lost them...

  114. ugh by jtrainor · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed people are arguing against IBM in this case. This seems fairly straightforward: If you buy something, you have to pay for it. The only reason people are heaping on IBM is because of knee-jerk anti-corporatism.

  115. I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the same people that took the NASA tapes.

  116. IBM already lost 5-10 million to inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on the date of the actual deal, IBM has lost $5-10 million due to inflation, add in their willingness to not charge interest so there's no hope of recouping that. We're already seeing a 67% discount on those computers. The district agreed to pay, it's had 15 years to prepare to pay this debt, why should IBM forgive this debt? It would set an FANTASTICALLY BAD precedent.

    Screw Contra Costa's PR offensive and those who voted in the article poll that IBM *should* forgive the debt.

  117. Thank you! by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    I'm always trying to improve and I've been getting lazy with MS Word correcting me all the time.

    Cheers!

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  118. CA is not top 5. by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1

    Truth be told: They are in California! California taxpayers pay more to public schools than any other state, per capita CA is in the top 5.
    US Department of Education says otherwise. That's the latest (2005) per capita direct expenditure report (using data from 2001-02).

    From left to right (All expenses, Total Ed Amount, Total Ed %, Elementary Amount, Elementary %, College Amount, College %, Other Amount, Other %):
    California is 7th, 14th, 39th, 11th, 27th, 24th, 39th, 30th, 35th.

    For me, the priorities of a budget are exposed in the percentages: California ranks 39th, 27th, 39th, 35th.

    Even when considering the actual amounts (14th, 11th, 24th, 30th), such rankings are far from being "top 5".


    On the topic of forgiveness: if they eventually agreed to a settlement, then both parties should live up to that settlement. It looks like the district wants to renegotiate, but complete forgiveness doesn't seem like an appropriate offer after a settlement.
    --
    This is not my sig
  119. Sounds like New Paltz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar stuff happened in New Paltz, NY. The district "lost" a couple million bucks, and dismissed the superintendent with some insane "separation bonus," in the 'hood of $2Million more.

    Public schools are routinely run by scoundrels and thieves whose mission is, to them, to bilk the state and federal budgets for as much money as they can while providing only as much service to the students as is required by law.

  120. I will gladly pick up the tab for this. by Galius+Persnickety · · Score: 0

    All I require is a 15-year interest free loan of 5M. If I invest that in an S&P500 index, I should have 17.5M at the end of the 15 years, assuming similar performance to the last 15 years (I'm not counting the fat quarterly dividends). I will then gladly write IBM a check for 5M and pocket the rest.

  121. Screw Contra Costa unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM should collect. The school went broke because they gave platinum-plated pensions and medical benefits to their workers. They didn't "hit hard economic times." They hit reality.

    Every dollar they don't have to pay is one more ill-gotten dollar the unions will get.

  122. Re:Break their thumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you're place of employment is going tits up

    "your", "tits-up".

    if you're local school districts

    "If your".

  123. Tax Deductions aren't free by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    Especially to government entities. A $5M write-off to IBM is at, the marginal corporate tax rate in CA of 39.4% Federal, and 8.84% state, $2.4M in revenue the government has to get elsewhere.
    Should the other 49 states have to pony up $1.97M, and the rest of CA $442K, even if IBM bears the rest of the burden of these bufoons?
    I think not.