Slashdot Mirror


Internet Phone Start-up Goes Belly-Up

westlake writes "The New York Times has a short piece on the failure of SunRocket, the second-largest internet phone service after Vonage, with 200,000 customers. Start-ups like SunRocket are under enormous pressure from the telcos and cable, which have marketing muscle and can bundle VoIP with Internet, TV, home security services, and so on. The start-up has only one product, and since they don't own the lines, they can't control the quality of service. Attracting subscribers can put a start-up deep into the red. Vonage added 166,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2007, but lost $77 million."

137 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Impossible by verybadradio · · Score: 1

    It seems almost impossible for smaller service providers to provide high quality service cheap enough to attract new subscribers and still compete/advertise, etc. Good luck! This type of business requires savy subscribers to start up, and lost of them.

    1. Re:Impossible by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

      This really blows. I switched from Vonage two-plus years ago to SunRocket, and now I'm scrambling. Many of the subscribers have been moving to ViaTalk, which is offering to honor existing SunRocket contracts and has a similar price (but only one phone number instead of two).

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
    2. Re:Impossible by VokinLoksar · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I've been with SunRocket for over 2 years now, and have actually been fairly happy with their service. Good thing I read Slashdot because they don't seem to be going out of their way to notify the customers about this. Can't call their support either, so I guess all we can do is wait until our accounts have been transferred and hope that the phone numbers are not lost. When you say subscribers have been moving to ViaTalk, do you mean that's where SunRocket is moving them or just those customers who were able to move before support went offline?

    3. Re:Impossible by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

      No. If you read the sunrocket forums (www.sunrocketforum.com), there is lengthy discussion about people jumping ship. Just to find out what the deal is I did a sales chat with VT. It took almost two hours for the chat to connect to someone. That person said they were getting slammed with SR customers after the discussion on the forums last night. Personally I'm uneasy about moving to another firm with a questionable future, especially since their parent is a company called HostRocket, which seems too similar to be coincidence to me. Anyway, the person I was chatting with didn't have any information on how to convert a SR Gizmo, but they did have info for a PAP2, which happens to be what's sitting in the basement from when I was a Vonage customer. The next question that logically enters my mind is - why not switch to Skype since it's so cheap? I could buy a phone adapter and be up and running. I don't know how good or bad the QoS is, though. I didn't see anyone on the SR forums discussing going that route.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
    4. Re:Impossible by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Because Skype has horribly noticeable audio delay?

      A note on that PAP2: it's locked to Vonage. There's a good chance that you can unlock it (bargainshare forums have instructions) but do NOT, under any circumstances, connect it to your network when you have a live internet connection. If you do so the device will update itself to the latest firmware and you will not be able to unlock it. The unlocking method works on the assumption that your existing unit will try to upgrade. Since you have an older unit, it still will. The latest firmware does NOT try to upgrade, so once you get that you're screwed.

      Once you've unlocked it, then you can connect it to the internet and use it with someone else.

    5. Re:Impossible by odie_colonie · · Score: 1

      No longer. Currently, ViaTalk is offering two phone numbers for the price of one. Unfortunately, we current customers are not eligible...

    6. Re:Impossible by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is correct. The offer is two phone LINES, not numbers. It is explained in detail on their site. One number, two lines. In order to get a second phone number you have to sign up for a virtual phone number, which is $3.95/mo or so.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
    7. Re:Impossible by nurseliz34 · · Score: 1

      We started with Sun Rocket in 2002 and have loved it! I was incredibly discouraged to find out that they were going "belly up". I have told all my friends and family about them and how affordable it is. Now I feel like a complete fool. However, I have heard nothing from Sun Rocket and I will continue to stay until the phone line goes dead. Then I'll just keep the cell service and be done with it all.

  2. I'll believe it... by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...when Netcraft confirms it.

    Till then, SunRocket VoIP is alive an well

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:I'll believe it... by BrandonReese · · Score: 1

      The SunRocket office in Springfield, MO closed without notice. It's dead.

  3. Probably going to Vonage? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm guessing the SunRocket customers will be moved to Vonage.

    I wouldn't worry about Vonage so much. They have 2.4 million subscribers already. Plus, it's not as if the cable company or telcos offering VOIP service have that much more control over the quality of their service either. They're still stuck with the same problems everyone else is in regard to Internet traffic.

    For not having control over their traffic, I've been using Vonage for almost 3 years now over Comcast in Michigan and now Bright House Networks' Road Runner service in the Tampa Bay area and I have to say, the quality of service has never sucked so long as my Internet connection is working right.

    1. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most likely with the telcos activly trying to distroy VOIP I am not going to go to a company that distroyed my cheap telephone service with their more expensive.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%! I won't ever get my service from Verizon or AT&T. They can suck it. If it comes down to it, and the telcos succeed in killing Vonage and everyone else in their industry, I'll probably either suck it up and get my VOIP service from Bright House, or just go back to having a cell phone as my primary line (which is also not from Verizon or AT&T).

      I'd call for boycott against Verizon and AT&T, but all those people who just signed up for a 2-year contract when they bought their iPhone would for sure not be following me. :)

    3. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and I have to say, the quality of service has never sucked so long as my Internet connection is working right. Which just demonstrates why owning the lines (and therefore being able to provide a bit more QA) really cuts both ways: if you put in the extra money and resources to keep your lines and service in working condition, everyone else using those lines to deliver their own service also reaps the benefits.
      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    4. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by pitdingo · · Score: 1

      unfortunately the telcos and cable companies will favor only their VOIP packets and not a competitors, so you do not "reap the benefits" unless you own the lines. This is what Net Neutrality is all about.

    5. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      However, with net neutrality, they wouldn't be able to give priority to any VOIP packets, including their own. It's a double edged sword. On one hand, they want to deliver QOS, on the other hand, people don't want them deciding which packets get better QOS. It would be nice if you could mark a packet as VOIP, and all VOIP packets would get treated as the same, and given a higher QOS over other packets where lag isn't so much of an issue, like large file downloads. However, I think that such a system would be abused, with many users tagging everything as VOIP, or whatever gets them the highest QOS. My personal opinion is that I'd rather have net neutrality, and have all packets treated the same, but we have to realize, that this is not without it's downsides.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Retric · · Score: 1

      Net neutrality says nothing about protocol driven QOS. Net neutrality states you can't alter service due to the source or destination of a given packet.

      PS: We had a form of net neutrality and EMAIL packets where downgraded vs. HTTP.

    7. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      Plus, it's not as if the cable company or telcos offering VOIP service have that much more control over the quality of their service either. They're still stuck with the same problems everyone else is in regard to Internet traffic.

      They aren't stuck with any of the same problems if the traffic never leaves their own network. The cable outfit's VoIP packets may never leave the cable network itself, if they designed it so the VoIP->PSTN switch-over happens before their network edge. Ditto for the telcos. And quite a few of the telcos (Verizon and AT&T come to mind) are Tier 1 providers in their own right -- and could easily have end-to-end QoS for their own VoIP traffic.

      Note: I'm not defending them or advocating for their service over Vonage or anybody else. Just pointing out the obvious. And for what it's worth, using T-Mo's @Home service (which isn't strictly VoIP, it's closer to GSM over IP), I haven't had any problems with my internet connection.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by bconway · · Score: 1

      Plus, it's not as if the cable company or telcos offering VOIP service have that much more control over the quality of their service either. Actually, they do. Cable companies like Comcast use segmented sections of their network for VoIP traffic, all the way down to the modem, which has two interfaces on the external side. You can download or upload all the porn you want, but it won't be touching your VoIP traffic. And since the connections to the PSTN are all within Comcast's network upstream, it really is a winner for quality.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    9. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

      back to having a cell phone as my primary line (which is also not from Verizon or AT&T).

      Look at T-Mobile's HotSpot @ Home service. It's basically GSM over IP (voice, data, SMS, etc), with the added advantage that you can do seemless handoffs between IP and GSM, i.e: start a call at home, walk out the door and it switches to GSM. I'm loving it. $39.99 for 1,000 cellular minutes (with nights & weekends), + $9.99 for the HotSpot add-on. I basically have unlimited calls. Plus I can use wi-fi in any area where there isn't a good GSM signal.

      T-Mobile doesn't have landline business in the United States so they don't have any reason to undercut their own offerings to keep a dying landline industry alive. And the best part is not giving your money to AT&T or Verizon.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about Vonage so much.
      Can any company sustain losing $77 million per quarter indefinitely? I'm not trolling, but seriously asking becasue I was considering moving to Vonage before reading this.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    11. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ***I have to say, the quality of service has never sucked so long as my Internet connection is working right.***

      That's the issue, now isn't it? My Verizon DSL connection slows to a crawl from time to time, and drops me completely several times a week. I can download huge files -- Slackware CDs, VMs, etc. And I can surf the net. But I can't hold an Internet Radio connection open for more than an hour or two. Rebooting the DSL modem is a regular occurence around here. My son's Comcast connection in Seattle wasn't any better. He used Vonage because he didn't really care if he lost some calls. Worked fine when it was up. Wasn't always up.

      Our analog phone service OTOH is fine.

      I'm going to put my phone on the digital connection? I think not. My spouse wants a reliable phone connection. I'll confess to being cheap. But I'm not crazy. No Phone over IP here until one of the local ISPs is able to keep a line up reliably.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    12. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't worry about Vonage so much. They have 2.4 million subscribers already. Plus, it's not as if the cable company or telcos offering VOIP service have that much more control over the quality of their service either. They're still stuck with the same problems everyone else is in regard to Internet traffic."

      Not really.
      1) Many of those people are essentially providing "last mile" service and not much more (easier to control), probably one reason they're so much more expensive.
      2) Many of the big cable companies and telcos have their own nationwide private networks they DO have control over.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    13. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by chill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does it come with a get-out-of-jail free card?

      Does it automatically pick up any open hotspot, or do they have to be pre-configured?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    14. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by superbus1929 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Key words: as long as the connection is working.

      I had a three day - THREE DAY - outage at my house, which took out my internet, TV, you name it. Therefore, since I'm a SunRocket customer (:'(), that took out my phone, too. Even better: my house is in a nice little recessed valley, which doesn't get good cell reception. Therefore, to call tech support, I would have to walk up the road about a quarter mile, and get one bar worth of reception.

      For a day and a half, this was the conversation:

      "Hello, yes, we're completely out here..."
      "OK! What exactly is out?"
      "My internet is out"
      "OK..."
      "And my Cable is out"
      "OK..."
      *talk a little longer. She asks for a phone number; I give her my cell, and instructions to leave a message if they get my VM, since I'm out of reception range*
      "Do you have a home phone number?"
      "Yes, but it's out too, thanks to the internet being out"
      "Do you have our Voice Over IP service?"
      "No, I use SunRocket"
      "Well, we don't do support for SunRocket, you will need to contact their tech support"
      "No, lady, I know you don't support SunRocket, but my internet and cable are out!"
      "You will need to contact SunRocket support"
      "No, this has nothing to do with Su--"
      "Thank you for calling Comcast! *CLICK*"

      After many call-backs and attempts to get her and the next three techs fired, I FINALLY - after three days - got someone out to the house, who explained why everything died: We were the victims of the most amateur attempt at stealing cable ever. It was laughable; shredded cable where he tried to put the connector on, cut wire everywhere, he eventually had the cable un-sheathed, and tied in together in a knot.

      But it took three days to get a tech, partly because it was a weekend, and partly because of SunRocket, and them absolutely refusing to help me because I DARED to have an internet service that Comcast didn't expressly approve.

      If anything did in my VoIP provider, it was this bullshit. And that leaves me with very unattractive options: Go to Vonage (who have their own problems), go back to AT+T land line, or go with Comcast's VoIP (a company who I'd dump completely if I had that option).

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    15. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does it automatically pick up any open hotspot, or do they have to be pre-configured?

      It won't automatically connect to an open one unless you add it to the list of saved networks. You can use any open hotspot with a DHCP server though.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    16. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by elgaard · · Score: 1

      The one paying for the connection should be allowed to prioritize packages on the connection he/she is paying for.
      Ie. The building where I live is paying an ISP for an ADSL connection and 16 IP-addresses.
      We use http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ for QoS and it works very well.

      But we would love to be able to tell the ISP to eg. prioritize incoming packages from the ISP to four of our IP-adresses.

    17. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can any company sustain losing $77 million per quarter indefinitely? I'm not trolling, but seriously asking becasue I was considering moving to Vonage before reading this.


      Actually, according to TFA, it was $73 million, but what's $4 million between friends? ;)

      And the answer is obviously "no." But, the real question is will the company continuously sustain losses in the millions? And the answer again, is "no." That's because the ratio of their net losses to total revenue dropped last year. It was 0.89 in 2004, 0.98 in 2005, but last year it dropped 0.52. See for yourself. It means that they've been losing less money. (Comparing the actual net loss figures doesn't make sense because the total revenue for each year grew exponentially, so you really need to compare their losses as a ratio to the total revenue). It also means that they are likely to continue losing less money as they add more subscribers.

      So, based on what I know about business economics, I would say that it's most likely that Vonage will continue to be around, so long as they don't lose their pending litigation against Verizon.
    18. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by n0w0rries · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rule #1 when dealing with level 1 tech support. You know what the problem is--so tell them what they need to hear. "Do you have a home phone number?" Your answer--"No" Problem solved. And whatever you do never tell them you're using a linux computer as your firewall! I'm running ipcop, but if I call tech support I tell them I've got my cable modem plugged directly into my Windows XP computer--and it still doesn't work.

    19. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by aevans · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're saying that you could take a 5 minute stroll and be able to communicate instantly with people anywhere in the world? Technology is truly amazing!

    20. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      I expect even a level 1 to know that SunRocket isn't my problem. Maybe as a Lv. 3, I have certain expectations, but I expect a Lv. 1 to at least be smart enough not to go "Hm, cable and internet... it's obviously this other company!"

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    21. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Does it come with a get-out-of-jail free card? Overzealous cops won't know you're using the coffee shop wifi. Laptops are obvious, phones aren't. Also, since T-Mobile seamlessly hands off the call to cellular when the wifi signal dries up AND bills for the call based on place of origin, you only need the wifi to initiate the call. Walk/drive away and the call continues to incur 0 added costs.

      Regardless, $40, let alone $50, is more than I pay for my home and cellular phones combined anyway.
    22. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about Vonage so much They've only lost money every year since they've existed. There's no need to turn a profit, none at all.
    23. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Wait so you are saying that you walked up the street for every support call, when simply walking around your house and checking the physical connection on your cable line(s) and the connection at the street would have immediately told you that someone was haxoring on your wires? What the hell are you doing on slashdot? Any geek knows how to steal cable and knows to check his own cables when things mysteriously go out. 3 days? Shame.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    24. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by n0w0rries · · Score: 1

      I don't think independent thought is a requirement for a lvl 1 support person.

      The script reads:
      10 Have the customer reboot.
      20 Ask basic questions to try and determine if blame can be shifted on to somebody else
      30 Put customer on hold while you try and learn something from a lvl 2 person.
      40 GOTO 10

    25. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Average Call Time.

      As soon as a Level 1 hears the name of another company, your call is terminated.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    26. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      See, when I first called them, reporting an outage (keep in mind, we're a multi-family house), they said there was a known outage in our area. If they'd have told us there was no known outage, in my mind, I probably would have gone to step B. Instead, I had that mental block, and on one told me that there was no general outage; all we knew was that our entire house was out, and no one was refuting a general outage.

      Otherwise, I'd have been all over it. But thanks to that, I didn't get that mental block out of my head.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    27. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      However, with net neutrality, they wouldn't be able to give priority to any VOIP packets, including their own. No. Net Neutrality is about setting QoS rules based on endpoints, not on content. You are allowed to set low latency rules for packets that you detect as VoIP, but you are not allowed to just set these rules for packets that are destined for your VoIP to POTS gateway, or for endpoints off your network that pay you extra money.

      However, I think that such a system would be abused, with many users tagging everything as VOIP, or whatever gets them the highest QOS. You're treating QoS as a one-dimensional thing, while in fact it is three dimensional (maybe more I've forgotten). The dimensions are:
      • Latency.
      • Probability of packet loss.
      • Throughput.
      VoIP wants low latency and consistent (although not necessarily very high) throughput. It also wants late packets to be dropped, rather than delivered late. Large file downloads want high throughput, low packet loss, and don't care about latency at all. Marking FTP traffic as VoIP would give you a very poor transfer rate. The packet loss would keep causing TCP to throttle the connection back, and it would probably have the bandwidth capped at something reasonable for a VoIP connection.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by GigG · · Score: 1

      ...so they don't have any reason to undercut their own offerings to keep a dying landline industry alive. And the best part is not giving your money to AT&T or Verizon.

      That is so funny. There is a book laying on my desk with the names of more customers of the "dying landline industry" in just one city than the total of VoIP customers nation and probably world wide.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    29. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 1

      I had similar problems with Bell (in Canada): they would refuse to diagnose the problem if I was not in front of the modem. After my first attempt to call their tech support since I had my dry line (i.e. moved to VoIP/Unlimitel), I noted all the information they would usually ask for and just pretend that I am rebooting my computer and so on (I even lost the habit of telling them that I use Debian GNU/Linux). Then I would eventually tell them whether they can ping my modem, which would eventually make them realise that there is a problem with the line. Yes, I know, this can make support technicians go crazy when the error is really the fault of the user, but modem lights and tcpdump usually provide good enough diagnostics).

      I had lots of fun when I moved my DID (i.e. 1-514-xxx-xxxx number) to my VoIP provider. Bell had forgotten to reconnect my DSL modem on the telco side to a "dry line" (or "dry loop", i.e. phone number with no voice signal) fictionnal number. This is usually automatic, I had even talked to them before migrating the DID. Then one day, at least 3-4 months after the switch, some technician noticed that a modem was attached to a number which is no more on their network and thought the modem was unused, so he disconnected it (according to Bell "we are sorry department" representative, which, I was flabergasted to hear actually exists, since I had never heard Bell say "sorry for our mess").

      But it was well worth it. Besides having much more control over the line using Asterisk, our bill is now 2-3$cad/month (billed per minute, we don't talk much) + 8$/month (unlimited, my wife talks way too much) for some european DID so that family can call as if they are making local calls.

      matt

    30. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by legoburner · · Score: 1

      If restarting the modem helps, could it be a buildup of heat in the modem? That was a factor causing a lot of downtime/dropped packets on a DSL connection that someone I know had. Turns out they had the modem in an unventilated cupboard and around spring/summertime it just choked from the heat.

    31. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by nuintari · · Score: 1

      The door swings the other way too, I work for an ISP, and we get calls from customers who are having problems with voip. The voip carrier always tells it is an issue with their ISP. It invariably turns out that they need to forward some ports on their router, or actually plug the fucking device in correctly, but they want us to talk their customer through fixing what is an issue with their service, but for some reason, they see fit to blame us.

      My policy for voip on our network: you can use it, it is not against our terms of service, we will do nothing to interfere with your service, but we will not guarantee that it will work, nor will we support it. If your internet is working, you have no reason to call me and say that I am somehow causing a problem with your voip service, I am not going to do some other company's end user support.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    32. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There is a book laying on my desk with the names of more customers of the "dying landline industry" in just one city than the total of VoIP customers nation and probably world wide.

      Who said anything about VoIP? In many nations cellular users outnumber landline users. VoIP won't kill the landline industry (though it won't help it). Wireless will.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    33. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by JVert · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Vonage doesn't have to compete with landlines they have to compete with cellular. And with their pricing I dont see that lasting very long.

    34. Re:Probably going to Vonage? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I use Vitelity.net with asterisk on a home server. $3/mo phone+ ~$0.01/min. I have a Nokia N800 internet tablet that I run a SIP phone client on, so whenever I'm at wifi my PDA rings and I can answer that. If I don't pick up one of the extensions I transfer to my cellular phone, which is a Virgin Mobile prepaid phone. As I'm usually either at home or around wifi, the cellphone really only gets answered when I'm in my car and even then I may not answer it (I'm driving home, damnit, leave me alone ;), so I don't use it much. All totaled I end up spending about $8-10/mo on the cellphone and $9-15/mo on Vitelity.

  4. This begs the question..... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ..... Can VOIP providers who aren't connected with a Telco make a go of it? So far it seems that the answer is no seeing that Sunrocket i dead and Vonage is not exactly healthy either.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This begs the question..... by wawannem · · Score: 1

      IMO, what makes this market tough is the saturation of competition + the low QoS of home broadband. I had lingo for a while until I eventually moved to the cell phone only setup. I was hoping that VoIP would drive the price of land lines down, but it does not seem to have phased telcos and the cable company VoIP offering is nothing short of highway robbery.

    2. Re:This begs the question..... by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Can VOIP providers who aren't connected with a Telco make a go of it?


      Yes. I fired the phone comany two years ago, now I have a Speakeasy data line with their VOIP running on it. Unless I am running more than five torrents my phone calls are near perfect every time and I pay a small flat rate for the VOIP, which includes calls to 22 countries 24/7/365 at no additional charge. Of course, the internet access itself is a lot more expensive than the rate I had with ATT but after factoring in the old ATT phone bill (rarely less than $80/month) it comes out to about the same as I always paid but with much better internet service, and of course no ATT.

      Not shilling, just a satisfied customer.
      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    3. Re:This begs the question..... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The dedicaed telephone network is still best, but I find VOIP quality better than cell any day. I suppose it all depends on what the broadband to your particular home is like.

    4. Re:This begs the question..... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      but I find VOIP quality better than cell any day.

      I've never had an issue with cell call quality. Perhaps that's because I live in a suburban/rural area and they don't have to resort to tricks like slashing the codec down to squeeze more people onto limited spectrum. My cell sounds just as good as any landline or VoIP phone that I've ever used.

      Where are you that you can detect a noticeable difference when using a cell phone? What provider are you using?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:This begs the question..... by sgholt · · Score: 1

      I think this is just the beginning of the end for all VOIP companies...price is low but service sucks. The service will never get better and the customers will begin to drop the service...give it about a year or two......I say good riddance! :)

    6. Re:This begs the question..... by westlake · · Score: 1
      Can VOIP providers who aren't connected with a Telco make a go of it?

      What struck me were the numbers, which do not impress: Vonage at $2.95 a share. Penny stock territory. SunRocket No. 2 in VoIP with 200,000 subscribers.

      From The-Handwriting-Is-On-The-Wall Department:

      Internet phone service provider SunRocket Inc. fired a significant number of employees and several top executives on June 29.
      The layoffs included Chief Technology Officer Mark Fedor and Chief Information Officer Robert Kramer. CFO David Samuels also is leaving the company. He resigned July 2 to take an executive position with another firm.
      The Washington Post reported Tuesday that SunRocket laid off 30 employees, a figure the paper said was a quarter of the company's staff.
      CEO Lisa Hook denied...at the beginning of May that her team was preparing to cut a significant number of staff -- which at the time numbered 160 full-time and contract employees.
      SunRocket has raised approximately $20 million in additional venture capital from existing investors since early spring bringing the company's total capital raised to date to about $100 million.
      The company is likely to [reach] August with a total of $30 million to $40 million in new venture capital, said one of SunRocket's investors. "There's a lot of interest in the company. Obviously it's been tough with the industry being under pressure, but the category is still strong."
      SunRocket has been pulled into the legal fracas over Internet phone technology.. as well as increased competition by cable providers packaging Internet telephone service... Vonage's disappointing {IPO] in May 2006 and poor stock performance has also hurt. Vonage shares debuted at a price of $17 on May 24, 2006 and were trading at $3.13 early on July 3. SunRocket fires 2 top execs, staff [July 3, 2007]

  5. SunRocket by UncleWilly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Things we learned

    1. Don't let a 3-year-old name your company

    1. Re:SunRocket by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      SunRocket
      Obligatory Simpsons reference:

      Skinner: Poland, tell us about your nation's achievements.

      Milhouse: Well, uh, I heard they sent a rocket to the sun once... at night! And there was that submarine, with the screen doors...

      Skinner: No, no, no, no, no. Young man, you need to do some serious boning!

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  6. Anyone remember Dialpad? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll never forget Leo Laporte laughing about the business model of Dialpad on "The Screen Savers" back in 1999. The idea of giving free phone service away, with no real way to recoup their money, was laughable even in those heady days of "internet 1.0". The model has improved only slightly in the "internet 2.0" era, I'm afraid.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by bxwatso · · Score: 1

      I forgot about Leo. Wow, that show imploded.

    2. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Leo was one of the hardest working men on television back in those ZDTV days. The guy was live on TV every day with 3 different shows, would do appearances on several OTHER shows, and still managed to find time to keep up with virtually every development in tech and try out tons of software. I don't think he slept.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by Nef · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no, it didn't. It, along with any other programming on TechTV was systematically dismantled by the asshats at Comcast since it competed directly with their crapass G4. And when I say competed directly, I mean they shared a demographic, nothing more. So Comcast bought TechTV, folded in 3 or 4 of the worst shows on TechTV and fired everyone else, including the ScreenSavers cast and crew. Now almost 2 years on, I can't say that anything is left of TechTV in the G4TV shithole.

    4. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by rlp · · Score: 1

      Leo was one of the hardest working men on television back in those ZDTV days.

      Now he's one of the hardest working men in podcasts / radio. Check out http://www.twit.tv/ (i.e. This Week In Tech) - his podcast empire. Leo helps make my daily commute tolerable.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    5. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

      Hey at least they weren't as laughable as AllAdvantage, they pretty much paid for my books freshman year of college and I even had a little drinking money left over. The best part was I never saw one of their ads.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    6. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by bxwatso · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am aware that G4 ruined Screen Savers. On the other hand, they saved us from Martin Sargent (just kidding, unscrewed was funny sometimes).

    7. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by Nef · · Score: 1

      My bad, having a crappy day and your 'imploded' comment rubbed me the wrong way. What I really miss is Morgan and Katt!

    8. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Adam Sessler is about the only person still left from those ZDTV/TechTV days still on G4. The basic G4 formula of today is this: "Pair a guy who knows SOMETHING about tech or gaming with a big-tit chick who wears low-cut blouses even in the dead of winter. Have them make lame jokes and talk about sex a lot. Repeat for every show."

      The only woman on that network with ANY dignity is Blair Butler. All the rest are just illustrations of what happens when you combine breast augmentation with anorexia. Most of the guys are little better.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by bferrell · · Score: 1

      cocaine will do that

    10. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by hokiemattdude · · Score: 1

      AllAdvantage was pretty handy for the college drinking fund. I remember Dialpad all too well, it was my parents' tool to harass me every single weekend for hours on end on the phone.

    11. Re:Anyone remember Dialpad? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      He's still on TV with 'The Lab with Leo', but only in backwards countries like Canada and Australia. It's not live, though.

  7. What can they do though? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What could a third party VOIP telco really do to make a more reliable service when they don't control the line. Here's my idea, have a protocol that automatically detects dropped packets, and lowers the bitrate until there's not so many dropped packets, or none at all. Personally, I'd rather hear someone at 8 kbps then hear them at 128 kbps with every other word dropped from the conversation. It might sound like a bad kids walkie-talkie you bought at Walmart, but it's better than dropping words. And if you explain to your users why they are getting bad audio quality, and recommend ISPs in their area that don't have problems with maintaining good connections, then you can help to give the big telcos a reason to give good service to their customers.

    Also, make all the features free. Call waiting, call answer, call forwarding, call filtering, and whatever other features you can think up. Telcos charge a lot of money for these extras. By making them free (including them in the monthly rate), you're offering customers a big incentive switch from the other guys. And since most of these features cost very little once they are initially developed, it's a wonder why you would even want to charge for them.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:What can they do though? by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      It's tough for numerous reasons.

      -The quality of service is dependent on the cable provider being consistent.
      -Even if the provider is good, there is no prioritizing for VOIP on the cable modem, which is a huge advantage for cable companies who want to do their own VOIP. Some will even give a little bit more upstream for VOIP users.
      -Some providers use their own routers (like Vonage). A lot depend on ethernet adapters. Routers that are not configured properly or are overloaded/old (and cannot handle the traffic) are problems, not to mention that many routers don't prioritize VOIP.
      -Cable companies get a connection to nearby servers. You're at the mercy of the general internet for third party VOIP. The quality isn't usually as good anyways.
      -With all of the above in mind, cable companies often give incentives for "triple plays" (TV, Internet, Phone). With my cable company , not only do you get a promo price on the phone ($30 v $35), but for having all three, I get $20 off my bill. So, phone service is $10, and I get a "Rewards" card that gives me free movies on Tuesdays.

      As far as reducing the voice quality, a lot of people wouldn't be happy with that I'd imagine. It's a barely better alternative to dropping.

    2. Re:What can they do though? by mpapet · · Score: 1

      What could a third party VOIP telco really do to make a more reliable service when they don't control the line.

      First of all, good for you for throwing some ideas out. What most people fail to understand is the VOIP protocol is **loaded** with features. The clients (and vonage) simply haven't caught up in most cases.

      Second, the whole notion that a voip provider doesn't "own the lines" is a joke. Yes, somewhere lots of telco promoters are using this crazy idea to inject FUD into the notion that consumers can get their telephony needs met elsewhere. Because the argument is being used at the highest classes of investors, it has special effectiveness. Kind of like when the NY Times runs a story. It's somehow more believable. In point of fact, you don't "own the line" to ./ and it works well right? In one way, the same is true for voip.

      That the telco provider can shape traffic in clear violation of common carrier status is easily addressed in some ways. But don't run with that idea because you need to understand how a voip session works to see that shaping peer-to-peer traffic is a bit more difficult than it seems. I'm not a routing genius, so I'd love to hear some opinions either way on this comment.

      Third, this is a relatively new market. (we're talking Wall Street scale) Investors typically hand their money over, watch the share price rise and expect no dividends. This kind of flame-out and others to follow are pretty typical.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    3. Re:What can they do though? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot (./ as you call it) works withing controlling the line. However, sometimes it takes 30 seconds for the page to load, some times it only takes 5. Regardless of how fast their servers can send the pages, sometimes there's just little slowdowns along the way that they can't control. When visiting a web page, 30 seconds of lag doesn't make it unusable. It's kind of annoying but you still get to see the web pages. When you're doing VOIP, you need the packets to get to their destination within a certain amount of time or it gets dropped, and the person on the other end doesn't get to hear the sound contained in that packet. There's no re-requesting packets when they don't get to the destination because it's already too late. I'm not a VOIP specialist, but I imagine lag times of anything over a second would be a showstopper for doing VOIP calls. You'd probably want something under 250 ms, garaunteed for all packets. Comparing Slashdot to VOIP is a really bad comparison because one requires very low lag times, while the other could care less.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:What can they do though? by mpapet · · Score: 1

      sometimes there's just little slowdowns along the way that they can't control.

      That my friend is the nature of the beast when it comes to voip. While the goal of a 1:1 translation of POTS service/quality is commendable, most consumers will gladly exchange lower quality calls for some combination of lower prices and more service.

      Comparing Slashdot to VOIP is a really bad comparison because one requires very low lag times, while the other could care less.

      No. The disconnect for you may be that you have experience-based expectations of some lag when going to /. You don't have the same experience-base with phone calls. But many people have similar expectations. Especially ones that have grown up with mobile phones as "the phone" versus POTS. People ARE caring less about their phone call quality.

      I manage an office that's 100% NATed voip over a T1 with cisco phones. Echo? Low-quality calls? Dropped calls? Yes to all of them with voip. Service and quality are far worse than the Nortels I used to admin, but the cost is **way** cheaper.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    5. Re:What can they do though? by chickenrob · · Score: 1

      "Also, make all the features free. Call waiting, call answer, call forwarding, call filtering, and whatever other features you can think up. Telcos charge a lot of money for these extras. By making them free (including them in the monthly rate), you're offering customers a big incentive switch from the other guys. And since most of these features cost very little once they are initially developed, it's a wonder why you would even want to charge for them."

      Sunrocket DID offer all these extras (and more) for free, that's one of the main reasons I switched to them.

      --
      People say my sig is the best thing about me.
    6. Re:What can they do though? by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      That's always the standard answer when talking about VoIP, that it's latency and not bandwidth, but in my experience more bandwidth always solves VoIP clarity problems.

      You mention "without cooperation from the routers along the way (i.e. make them have VoIP packets "jump the queue" when there's a lot of traffic to process)" - which is really QOS - but QOS only comes into play when you don't have enough bandwidth to begin with to support all the traffic you're trying to pipe down the line. If you had enough overhead then there would be no traffic for the VoIP traffic to "jump", no need for QOS, and altogether a good VoIP connection. I.e., the only thing that causes the random delay of packets is not enough bandwidth to do what you want to do - buy more bandwidth, enjoy your call quality.

  8. Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have broadvoice and on a regular schedule Verizon happens to "lose" the routing information to my local Broadvoice phone number. It just magically disappears and suddenly people calling my phone get a "this number can not be dialed" message.

    I end up calling broadvoice letting them know and they have to jump through hoops to get Verizon to quit acting like a 3 year old and put the routing info back in. This happens twice yearly. I also hear of it happening elsewhere as well with providers other than Broadvoice.

    Telcos are scared to death of Voip. It sounds way better than cellphones so the current generation see it as great. They also see the $13.95 a month compared to the $49.95 a month from a telco and it's a no brainer. (Yes My VoIP line costs $13.95 a month. Yes Verizon charges $50.00 a month for a basic, every call costs you $0.03 + long distance charges phone line.)

    So the telcos screw with the Voip providers, "accidentally".

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Zapped.Info · · Score: 1

      Agreed! When I offered dialup service, using analog lines, back in 1996, we would find staples through our phone lines in the telco closet. It got to the point where we had to put a camera up in there! As I write this post, COX cut our businesess data line, because our neighbors didn't pay their bill. Our neighbors have the same address as us, but they are in a different suite. Rather than check for the suite number, the COX tech, just cut everything to the building address...ooops sorry...I'd like to sue them, but according the the contract we signed, they're not even responsible for gross negligence. We'd be bound to arbitration by some supposed unbias firm and we'd have to pay the fees for it. Does anyone know anything about contract law? Could I still sue them if there was a repeating pattern? These telcos/cable providers, have close to monopoloy power, if you don't sign their contract, there is no other contract to sign! I'd like to sue Cox's ass off - God knows they deserve it! I'd bet there's some class action opportunity here too!

      --
      It's important to know that I forgot what I thought I knew when I thought I knew it all:Now I don't even know whatIknow.
    2. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      It sounds way better than cellphones so the current generation see it as great

      That part I've never understood. My cellphone works just about everywhere. If you are a big talker and can shift some of your calling to nights & weekends (easy to do when all of your friends have cell phones too) then it often winds up costing you $0.015 - $0.03/minute to use a cell phone to make all your calls. Toss in the fact that you can use it just about anywhere and you aren't fighting your neighbors torrent of the Sopranos for bandwidth and I don't see what advantage there is to VoIP.

      T-Mobile's UMA offering seems like a good combination of the two, though the non-promotional price of $20 is a little steep. The promotional price of $9.99 seems about right. In any case, I doubt we'll see anybody else roll it out in the US anytime soon. Sprint is probably the only other provider that would offer it (AT&T and Verizon never would because it would undercut their landline business) and they can't because it's based on GSM.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      And they can't do CDMA over IP?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      And they can't do CDMA over IP?

      I'm sure they can, but there isn't a published standard for it as far as I'm aware, so they'd be building it from scratch. UMA/GMA has been around for awhile.

      AT&T could implement a UMA network pretty easily but I doubt they will, as it would undercut their landline business.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      CDMA is a physical layer protocol. You wouldn't ever do CDMA "over" IP.

      You might want to have a phone that's able to transmit a CDMA signal and *also* an 802.11 signal, so you could connect to cell networks and LANs with the same device. If your network were coordinated well enough such that you could transfer calls between VOIP and the cellular network, that would be a big step, and seems to be what the grandparent was talking about.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    6. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      That part I've never understood. My cellphone works just about everywhere. If you are a big talker and can shift some of your calling to nights & weekends (easy to do when all of your friends have cell phones too) then it often winds up costing you $0.015 - $0.03/minute to use a cell phone to make all your calls. Toss in the fact that you can use it just about anywhere and you aren't fighting your neighbors torrent of the Sopranos for bandwidth and I don't see what advantage there is to VoIP.

      Some of us don't have coverage at home--from any provider.

      I talked to TMo just today about their UMA. As soon as they offer it on a unit feature-comparable to my MDA, I'll snap it up in a heartbeat.

    7. Re:Problems are usually CAUSED by telcos. by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Those "accidents" are probably real. I work for a telco manufacturer (not a telco) and I can count the number of people I've dealt with in the last five years that really understand telco networks on just over one hand.

      Telco's aren't "scared to death of VoIP". They're using it, in the back-end of the networks, probably where it really belongs. In controlled environments. The number of people using VoIP for home service isn't significantly changing their backbone traffic, which someone pays them for, either way. Old-style voice traffic goes to the local switch, and gets muxed into long-haul backbones. New-style VoIP (even if the end-customer is paying a small amount to the VoIP dial-tone provider) still brings in 2/3's of the revenue of an old-style phone line in the form of either a) DSL or b) a Cable provider that ends up buying bulk bits from here to there and paying for telco inter-connect anyway.

      VoIP to the home doesn't bother the traditional telcos at all. Business as usual, just more people working on the IP backbone and less on the traditional backbone. The fiber has been able to carry either one for decades, and they own the long-haul fiber, so why should they care?

      Large global carriers love all of it... own the undersea fiber, and fill it with traffic. Bill appropriately so that it's expensive but not cost-effective for someone to go lay their own fiber. Done. Permanent cash cow.

      Also, the skill level in telco is falling. People aren't trained like they were under the monopolistic Bell System. There's also a disadvantage to being a clueful old-schooler in telco. We get trouble tickets at work where telco employees who've worked in telco for 20 years longer than I have, send in things like, "The customer heard X message".

      The message they heard included a call-error tone, and had a switch tag number on the end of it, and they're wondering if it came from our box and want "confirmation" that we didn't play the message before they contact their own switching/routing groups internally. The person reporting the "trouble" knows our system has no such message and hasn't had for the almost 10 years its been deployed in ANYONE's network.

      But... that ticket took up a whole day of "work", sending e-mails to vendors, looking intelligent to the bosses, generally wasting everyone's time -- but no one at a vendor is going to call a large telco's employees on something like that! We're just happy as clams to continue collecting the money for the service contract, and their useless tickets make our numbers look good. We also play along and "work" the ticket, sending logs, showing the customer where the system NEVER sent such a message and directory listings of message files showing where the message doesn't exist (even though THEY know this), and generally -- the "system" just feeds on itself.

      Or for a more "modern" example, the logs will show that the switch dropped a SIP call and sent us a "tear-down", complete with a SIP end-of-call message, and they'll call complaining that our system "hung up on" someone. Uh... nope. But here, let me be a good service rep and spend a couple of hours preparing a document that shows you the full logs of exactly what your stupid broken switch did when it hung up on us... heck, I'll even colorize the important bits for you. Cool, huh? EXCELLENT customer service provided, and another day of excitement in telco, abated.

      Seriously... telco is bad, but not for the reasons many people think. It used to be fairly "hard" to get a senior position in the Bell System. You had to work at it, and go to tech school, and get good scores, and then more training, and understand what you were doing as you worked your way up the technical ranks. You were proud to work for the Bell System. You got to go on "special project" leave to other areas of the country, if you were really good. In fact, you could become a "Subject Matter Expert" and actually have sign-off authority on projects even at a technical level, that NO manager cou

      --
      +++OK ATH
  9. Losing money by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Attracting subscribers can put a start-up deep into the red. Vonage added 166,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2007, but lost $77 million."

    I'm not surprised - Vonage gave me $200 to sign up (CC Giftcard)for a year at $14.95/month; netting them $80 (assuming they paid full price for the CC card and don't kickback anything to CC for the signup)for the year. I was nice, I didn't take their free PAP I simply canceled my existing Vonage service and activated the new number on my existing PAP. Strange way to run a railroad; but I'll take the cash, thanks.

    The upside is I like their service - it works great from Europe so I avoid expensive calls; to Europe it is a wash at the basic level but if you call a lot it is cheaper with the unlimited calling.

    There are other solutions now, but when I first signed up they were the only plug and play solution.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  10. Re:Cacan Yoyou Hehear Meme Nowow? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That sorta ruins the point of VOIP. You know, being able to choose your phone provider.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  11. Turnover? by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vonage added 166,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2007, but lost $77 million.

    The turnover rate for Vonage is very high from what I've read. Is that added subscriber number on top of their pre-existing user base or is it just what they added in the first quarter? They could be hemorrhaging faster than they can bring in.

    1. Re:Turnover? by glindsey · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't worry... Vonage makes sure people can't quit their service by keeping you on hold for over a half-hour, claiming that their "computers are down" when you finally get to a person, and then hanging up on you.

    2. Re:Turnover? by dattaway · · Score: 1

      I can confirm Vonage's sleazy retention game. You forgot the very thick accent of the person that you eventually reach after an hour's worth of pushbutton and wait hell. Not to mention the poor bitrate of their offshored support location. I had to get the message across by putting the bills in dispute with my credit card company. Vonage does NOT want to have complaints on their merchant accounts. The day after they discovered they couldn't bill me, I got a call the NEXT day by someone who spoke ENGLISH very well. I had to argue with that guy for 15 minutes why it took 9 MONTHS to cancel my account with a credit stop. My account was promptly cancelled and I was more than refunded the difference.

      I'm currently happy with my VoIP from Packet8. The one time in the last year I had to call them, I got someone who spoke English and took care of my needs right away. Just like Vonage, I never had a problem with bandwidth. But its nice talking to a local. Those are the things that could save Vonage, but it may be too late. Vonage used to be a good company before they outsourced their baby.

  12. Ah well by GFree · · Score: 1

    I suppose SunRocket should have followed the wise words of Homer Simpson.

    "You tried your best, and you failed miserably. The lesson is: never try."

  13. Same thing happened to many indie DSL by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    "...since they don't own the lines, they can't control the quality of service..."

    If you didn't get your DSL through Ameritech, (the only game in town around here,) you were pretty much guaranteed that your DSL service would be down at least 2 weeks straight every other billing period. Nothing your ISP could do about it except stall, hoping Ameritech would fix "the lines." At the very least, I think Ameritech was sandbagging, at worst, and I believe the worst, Ameritech was deliberately shutting off service.

    Much as I hate the cable company, I have a cable modem (and a prepaid cell phone) now. Screw Ameritech.

    1. Re:Same thing happened to many indie DSL by bxwatso · · Score: 1
      DSL is an interesting technology in that it works at all. For the 80 or so years before someone discovered that DSL could work, telcos made a variety of design choices that were incompatible with DSL (line taps, coils, analog repeaters). In fact, unless you live very close to a central office, the best way to get good DSL is to run fiber to a neighborhood cross connect box (or better still to your block's pedestal.

      ILECs are required to open this improvement to DSL CLECs, but may not be required to install such improvements just for a CLEC. Also, some states mandate the removal of line taps, coils, and analog repeaters, and some don't. In any event, most states do not require an ILEC to guarantee the line's quality for DSL purposes, which means that the most common fix when a CLEC DSL goes down is to swap lines until a better one is found. Not surprisingly, the ILEC doesn't care much since it isn't making any appreciable money on the deal.

      Cable companies aren't required to open their networks, but if they did, I strongly suspect they would allow the same troubles for their competitors. If you want good broadband, go with the facility owner, IMO.

      The best route to better and cheaper broadband is improved G3, WiMax, and power line based competition.

    2. Re:Same thing happened to many indie DSL by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      This is also true in the discount cell phone market: Secondary cell carriers like a former employer of mine were completely at the mercy of the monopolistic local Baby Bell, Ameritech^H SBC^H AT&T.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Same thing happened to many indie DSL by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Ameritech (now SBC) had a very simple procedure. All new "neighborhoods" were wired fiber-to-vault with an underground vault which split it out into copper pairs for the homes in that area. The vault is pretty small and was designed long before there was DSL. Since every CLEC or DSL provider's DSLAM could not be put into the vault the only way around the 1996 decree was that no DSLAM (including Ameritech's own) could be put in a vault. Physical impossibility never entered into the lawmaking process - if they had DSL available, every DSL carrier/CLEC had to be supported in the vault.

      Therefore, if your house was built after 1980 there is no possibility of getting DSL service in the Ameritech service area. At least in Illinois and a good part of Wisconsin that I know of.

      I would expect DSL to be a transitory service because sooner or later everybody is going to be served from a vault with a minimum amount of copper. Copper to the CO is pointless from a telecom perspective and expensive to install and maintain. I am not sure the current rules can be used to force 5-10 different DSLAM devices at the fiber termination, but if having one means the door is open to requiring all of them to be present you can forget about DSL being available with this type of service.

  14. As a Sunrocket Subscriber by smallferret · · Score: 1

    This is worrisome. I've been really happy with my service--I signed up on a "buy one year, get the second year free" deal, so it's about $8/month for service. When I hit the Sunrocket website, http://www.sunrocket.com/, it doesn't seem to have changed. They're still asking for business, and there isn't any mention of this story. The only difference that I notice is that when I log into my member page, there's a message that says "Voicemail is currently not available." But again, no mention of ceasing operations or anything else. I guess we'll just have to see...

    1. Re:As a Sunrocket Subscriber by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not go with a real VoIP provider? A SIP provider like les.net? I've been using that service for a long time now. Termination (ability to call PSTN) is separate from DID (PSTN calls you), so you do not even have to worry about monthly charges if you have a local phone number because of DSL or something. Yes, some places do not allow you to have an unbundled service. :(

      Of course, Packet8 or other, less technical solutions are available.

    2. Re:As a Sunrocket Subscriber by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      A SIP provider like les.net? I've been using that service for a long time now.

      Are you having any trouble with dropped calls on their termination? I've been seeing some of that lately, but debugging is a hard problem, between firewalls, ISP's, providers, etc.

      Here's an IAX2 tutorial for les.net I did, in case anybody needs it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:As a Sunrocket Subscriber by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Never dropped calls. Once I could not terminate via VoIP because of problem on their end - fixed in 30 minutes. But never dropped calls. I only use SIP via Asterisk. Never used IAX2.

      I use Linux 2.6.18 with SIP iptables module to forward all traffic to internal Asterisk gateway. I'll have to upgrade to Asterisk 1.4.x sometime soon so I can finally take advantage of the SIP jitter buffer. (Jitter is not really a big problem for myself)

    4. Re:As a Sunrocket Subscriber by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the feedback - appreciated.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. no more voice mail by Orcish_Rodent · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am/was a Sunrocket subscriber. Everything was really great, one year and 9 months of everything just working for $200 a year. Right now the phone still works, I can call and be called by people. However, the voice mail is gone both the message box on the website and the ability to leave messages when calling me (it just rings forever). I'm guessing all my old messages are toast too. When calling customer service (800-786-0132) you get a message the last part in an almost robotic voice,

    "Sunrocket! The no Gotcha phone company! ... We are no longer taking customer service or sales calls. Goodbye."

    Well I am out 2.5 months service, I guess they learned how to "get" me.

    1. Re:no more voice mail by feepness · · Score: 1

      Crap, same thing for here and I've been with them since 2005.

      But my service plan got renewed in MAY so I'm out 10 months of service!!! That makes my monthly cost 600/26 instead of 600/36 = $23 instead of $17.

      Oh well, they were still a great deal while they were around. I loved the international calling rates.

    2. Re:no more voice mail by NateTech · · Score: 1

      You paid a lower-than-sustainable price for the service and they went under. They didn't "get you", you got yourself.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    3. Re:no more voice mail by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Don't know what you're emotional about.

      What's advertised and what you get are RARELY the same in the tech "sector".

      People dedicate whole jobs to reviewing products and usually rate companies that produce products that match their advertising, fairly high.

      Software/computers are probably one of the worst examples of "you don't get what you were told it would do."

      What's the big deal? It's just naievete to think that a $14/month phone service would survive.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  16. Crap! by cyberkahn · · Score: 1

    I have been a SunRocket customer for almost a year now and the service has been awesome. In addition to the much cheaper rates than Vonage, the voice quality IMHO was excellent in spite of "not controlling the lines" as well as the customer service. Bye SunRocket. :-(

  17. Procrastination pays off. by SailorMeeko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been a subscriber to Vonage for a few years now. Although I am happy with their service, I don't use the phone that much, so SunRocket's package that was something like $9.99/month for 200 minutes was very attractive to me and for the past couple of months I have been meaning to change my service to them. Every week I keep telling myself, "Ok, this week I will move from Vonage to SunRocket", but the procrastinator in me kept putting it off. Now I'm glad I didn't change.

    Moral of the story: Procrastination pays off.

    1. Re:Procrastination pays off. by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: Sometimes things happen that are completely unrelated to ones inputs =)

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  18. CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by gelfling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have AT&T CallVantage, their VoIP offering, against my will. My employer installs and pays for it.

    It is SHIT.

    The voice quality is average at best. The reliability is horrendous. At any time and for any reason the entire service drops out - nothing no dialtone, nothing. Inbound calls route straight to voicemail about 50% of the time.

    AT&T's tech 'support' is very simple - they tell you the only thing to do is to install he TA in front of the router behind the cable modem. But the Centillium MTA-1 is a locked down box and it's configured as a NAT device so it fucks up my Homelan every time someone looks for a DHCP refresh. So I have to put it behind the router instead and because of that tech 'support' won't 'support' it. It also consumes a great deal of bandwidth - about 128k. That's a LOT for quality that isn't crystal fucking clear. That's the same as two ISDN channels and for that much bandwidth I should be able to hear you sleeping on the other end.

    Phone companies will kill VoIP just like they have killed everything else. They'll crush all comers and then do what they do best. Fuck up the service and rape the customers.

    1. Re:CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by skidv · · Score: 1

      Can you get a second IP from your Internet carrier? For many, this minor upgrade is less than 10 per month. Then you'll be able to put the router and the voip box side-by-side.

    2. Re:CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Yes I had heard that as a solution, thank you.

    3. Re:CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by gelfling · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the Centillium MTA-1 is configurable at all from the customers perspective. You can make noises at AT&T and what they do is quietly change things to throttle their own bandwidth up and down. They do not divulge any specifics. It's even worse if you set the line to use a fax/modem. That reserves 128k on its own. Which is what? 8x what the corresponding analog bandwidth is?

    4. Re:CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      Strange, I'm on VZ FiOS and Callvantage is the BEST VoIP I've used. I'm using it right now. And I have used before Sunrocket, and Lingo. It really does now sound better than POTS. I'm south of Pittsburgh, PA, and I conenct to their NYC servers via 4-5 hops I believe. So where are you located, and where are you connecting to? And as an AC suggested, ask for a more modern modem. I have a very new D-Link with the Callvantage, and it works swimmingly behind the router, no fiddling.

    5. Re:CallVantage is from Lucifer Himself by afidel · · Score: 1

      4x, normal voice calls go over channelized lines where each channel is 64Kbps with either one 16Kbps D(controll) channel per 2 lines for BRI or a 64Kbps D channels per 23 lines for PRI. Larger than T1 lines keep the same ratio AFAIK.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. Something to be said about US startup culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I've been satisfied as a sunrocket subscriber. Not blown away, except by the price, but not disappointed. Overall, it's a phone, it works, service is good enough. I'm not much in to the pindrop BS or "phone quality" which all seems kind of shitty to me, just so long as I can clearly communicate with my loved ones. The risk of going with a smaller company was pretty heavy until about a year in to the deal. I've been suspecting this would happen for about 6 months.


    So what little I've been able to figure out about them, it's a standard recipe startup. They got a management team put together. Their idea wasn't really an innovation, they just changed the price structure and payment schedule for phone service. They banged out a moderately flashy website and a brand. Technically they are about average at best. The scheme seems to be if you can grow fast enough, you can either survive or bail out. I simply cannot see how they were building a long term company. So they have 200,000 subscribers, most aren't married to long term contracts so the value isn't as high as it could be for selling the company. Assuming they are all at the cheapest subscription, that's $40m a year in revenues which is no laughing matter. you can sustain a fairly large group of people on $40m a year. How were they burning that?


    Could they not get more VC? I mean a $40m stream of revenue is compelling. How much more do they need to profit? It seems like if they were in it for the long term, they could have burnt less or shut the burn down and continued to grow more slowly. I've worked at a handful of startups and you won't believe the amount of work we did to make a few million dollars a year. We're they selling service cheaper than they were buying it? I don't know the numbers for telcos but at 200,000 users, they should be able to work intelligently and at least sustain, maybe not get rich but if you can't stay cash flow even at that point something seems wrong, what do you need? 10% of the US subscribing?

  20. So....? by achten · · Score: 1

    What is the big deal? If you are not relevant to the market you are trying to serve/benefit-from you are out. It is as simple as that.
    Nothing much here. Move on.

  21. Got a refund by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 1

    Bought into the service in Feburary, spent two months trying to get it to work.

    Got nowhere.

    Called up and canceled, got a pro-rated refund, but also got to keep the gizmo and free phone. Back in April.

    After a lot of debugging, it seemed to me they were robbing Peter to pay Paul. My gizmo would connect without error 50% of the time, giving me a dial tone, but not enough time to make a call (it re-connects every 30 seconds).

    If you complained enough they would make changes on their end that would give you better service, but it seemed to me they didn't have enough reliable servers up and running to handle their clients.

  22. Getting out by kanwisch · · Score: 1

    I got out with the loss of venture funding and apparent lack of future at Sunrocket. Our line's voicemail is now non-functional so I've switched over to another VoIP service that's offering an incentive to Sunrocket customers. It was a great service while we had it and I'll miss the free European calls. I dearly hope the new service will provide service as well as Sunrocket did. But I've got a cell phone so the landline was merely a convenience.

    VoIP is still a new market and to expect companies to not go under is to ignore normal business conditions. I was surprised Sunrocket went under but its been clear for a long while that they all won't survive.

    On Vonage, I too have heard they lose lots of people and the cause (as I understand it from forums) is poor customer service and difficulty in getting out. They will continue to lose customers until they realize the value of quality customer care, or go out of business entirely.

  23. Best way to contact Sunrocket subscribers? by End+Program · · Score: 1

    I run a free directory whose main purpose is to allow people to find each other via old information (lookmeup.org) The service could help people find ex-Sunrocket subscribers via their old phone numbers. Anyone know the best way to inform Sunrocket users?

  24. I have (had) Sunrocket :-( by arhar · · Score: 1

    I gotta say I'm very sad about this. Sunrocket was awesome, I was paying $15/month for them, and I never had any problems with their service.

    I guess now we all gotta figure out what to switch to... apparently http://www.viatalk.com/ offers to take on any Sunrocket customers at $200/year.

    1. Re:I have (had) Sunrocket :-( by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      I'm also very upset about SunRocket's demise particularly considering that I moved over from Vonage after a disappointing experience with their quality of service (and yes, it was their service not my ISP because I had no other cable problems) and the quality of their customer (dis)service.

      Looking at ViaTalk I'm glad to see that coverage is available in my area and that it's list of included features is longer even than both Vonage and SunRocket put together! ViaTalk looks very promising indeed and if SunRocket customers are moved wholesale to ViaTalk it looks likely that they will be a more than suitable replacement.

      If however I have to face going back to Vonage, going to my ISP, going cell-only or going to my local telco (in order of preference), I'm not sure what I'll do -- none of them seem appealing. :(

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  25. Marketing Failure? by DCheesi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So this is (was) the #2 VoIP company behind Vonage? So why is it that I've never even heard of them?! Granted, I've never actually gone shopping for VoIP service. But I am involved in the telecomm/datacom industry, so you'd think I would have at least heard the name.

    Perhaps lack of visibility was part of their problem...?

    1. Re:Marketing Failure? by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps lack of visibility was part of their problem...?

      I have Sunrocket service, and it's actually thanks to Slashdot--this was the first place I had heard of them (someone here got a referral bonus from me). Now that I've had the service for a year and half, I've seen them advertising on various websites, but they've never done TV advertising like Vonage. I'm not sure that Vonage has the best plan either though, because they're spending so much money on advertising that they lost $77M last quarter despite gaining almost as many customers as Sunrocket has.

      I had already filed with the Dispute Center with my credit card, so hopefully I'll get some of my money back. I think I'll try to unlock my "gizmo" (that's what Sunrocket called their SIP device) and get it to work with Skype (only $90/year for SkypeIn + SkypeOut). It looks like I'll be losing my home phone number, and I'll have to use my cell phone in the interim.

    2. Re:Marketing Failure? by nolife · · Score: 1

      Word of mouth I assume. I know and have got at least 10 people to sign up with them (ouch). I never saw a Sunrocket commercial or banner ad. I guess their lack of advertising was saving them money? Look at Vonage though, everyone has heard of them, they are the number 1 VOIP provider and still losing extreme amounts of money. Is one method better then the other? Well I guess Vonage is still around but I would not say they are any better financially then Sunrocket is/was.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:Marketing Failure? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Same here. Been in telco over a decade, and had never hear of 'em.

      They must have had some real dolts in Marketing... that or never had enough budget to really make a go of it, anyway.

      Hey some people got some crappy phone service at lower-than-sustainable prices for a little while. Isn't that what everyone was screaming for when Judge Green broke up the Bell System?

      You GOT it, America. Congratulations! Competition means that some companies DO NOT SURVIVE, especially if they don't have a sustainable business model. These guys... didn't.

      Welcome to un-regulated phone service. Enjoy.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  26. Thoughts from a former SunRocket employee by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (Note: I left after a year in October 2006, after things really started going downhill).

    Basically, there's not one bigreason SunRocket went under, but rather a few smaller reasons that added up. The main one being that there was too much focus on bringing in management from the outside (mostly from AOL) instead of promoting from within. Also, employee retention was a big problem. When you start seeing early employees of the company quitting or getting fired, it's very demoralizing to those still there.

    I ended up leaving after I was involuntarily transferred to another department (which was supposed to be temporary, but my requests to go back to my previous department were ignored), I had a director-level non-techie jerk that had been hired from outside SunRocket placed as my immediate supervisor, and they decided to blow hundreds of thousands of dollars on network monitoring software when we in the process of doing the same thing with Nagios and/or OpenNMS & saved big money.

    To all of the former customers of SunRocket, as well as anyone considering hiring a former SunRocket employee: just about all of the non-management folks (especially the support personnel based in the US, & the technical groups) were the most competent group of people I have ever worked with, and the majority of them did care about providing the best VOIP service possible.

    1. Re: Thoughts from a former SunRocket employee by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      Something you should keep in mind on the 'outside management' front.
      When a company is looking for the next round of VC funding .. Management, [somewhat on the director level, but mostly higher] is very important in a VC's decision to give you more money.

      So what you, someone who is working on the floor, might have interpreted as a rush to hire outside management from a big company - might actually have been a play to make the company more 'fundable' in a VC's eyes.

      Additionally, as much as its great to think that employing directors from within, at a company that is a one or two year old startup - thats unrealistic. Fortune 500's can afford to promote from within, because people might be sitting in the next position down for several years. A startup doesn't have that luxury. If a start up needs a director, they need it now .. and they need them to hit the ground running with a proven track record, because even a low 2-3 months ramp up time is a major asset burn.

      Also .. something to consider with software etc spending :

      Many times, a VC will give a new company starting $$ with caviats. Like :
      "We promise you 15 million, and here is $3m of it, once you buy all microsoft/sun/oracal platforms, [at a cost of 8 million] we will give you the remaining balance." So those hundreds of thousands they were spending on monitoring software might have been a stipulation along the road of aquiring funds. [This is very common place in the VC world - more so on the west coast vs the east.]

      Not saying this is what happened at SunRocket, just that what was going on, might not have been visible to the folks outside of the boardroom.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    2. Re: Thoughts from a former SunRocket employee by jjthegreat · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, this proves that once again, that there isn't a bad company, just bad mananagement.

  27. refund? by jemminger · · Score: 1

    OK, so now that sunrocket's "24-7" customer service line promptly hangs up on you, WTF do we do about getting a refund? they just charged me last month $199 for my renewal.

    1. Re:refund? by holysin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Easy, talk to your credit card company and dispute the charge (I paid $199 for 1 year of service, and the company went belly up after a month.) American express cards tend to be the best for this (6months since charge is where it starts to be a problem), but any CC should easily refund you the money w/n a couple months if you were just charged last month. Personally, in the vain hopes that sunrocket is in fact moving me to something else, I'm waiting to see what happens before I dispute the charge/mentall take the loss. The phone line works, and as I'm now living in England... Well, I'd like to keep an american phone line, and signing up for a new company isn't the easiest thing to do.

    2. Re:refund? by westlake · · Score: 1
      so now that sunrocket's "24-7" customer service line promptly hangs up on you, WTF do we do about getting a refund? they just charged me last month $199 for my renewal.

      you stand in line with the other 200,000 paid-up subscribers and kiss your money goodbye.

    3. Re:refund? by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      No, you call your credit card company and dispute the charges. Sunrocket's merchant account provider will be forced to eat the refund if they can't get it out of Sunrocket.

      Even though most contracts say 60 days for a dispute, most credit card companies will extend that in a case like this, and a merchant (or the merchant account provider) is liable for 12 months or more for chargebacks.

  28. Residential VoIP is a non starter by bmajik · · Score: 1

    ... as long as there is the last-mile monopoly.

    the SnR on my Qwest DSL line varies enough that i'll go days at a time with line-retrains every 3 minutes due to "crc_error threshhold exceeded". Years ago, I ditched the ISP supplied product ( an ActionTec 1524, which tended to hard-lock every 36 hours, and didn't support basic features like _port forwarding_ properly ) and got a cisco 678 off of ebay. I've called before and the gist is somewhere between "we're not seeing any problems here" and "it must be on the inside of your house".

    Yeah - it must be, since the wire coming into my house goes directly into the back of my Cisco 678 and there's nothing else attached at all.

    I'd love to axe my ties to the traditional phone co (i've been cable & tv free for a couple years) but short of a low speed long range wireless ISP, I need them because they own the cable in the ground, and really have no incentive to make my internet connectivity reliable. I can't see VoIP ever taking off when some other company owns the rights to their buried lines (and your property), and has no incentive to provide a good product/service.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  29. gizmo unlock? by rbrewer123 · · Score: 1

    I'm a SunRocket customer. Appears my service isn't working anymore. Does anybody know how to unlock the gizmo so I can use it with a VoIP provider like les.net?

    1. Re:gizmo unlock? by trampel · · Score: 1

      I saw a link in a forum earlier today: http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com/

    2. Re:gizmo unlock? by Sesq · · Score: 1

      Get your passwords here --> http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com/

  30. Where was the notice? by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

    Yesterday, we remarked at my house that the phone was down. We felt it a temporary issue and left it at that.

    Today, we found out that the service was down because the company was dead. We didn't find out from anyone at SunRocket, we found out on Slashdot. On SLASHDOT! And so far, no luck in contacting support about "Hey fuckers, we just paid you, how about a fucking refund!?".

    I think we got gipped.

    --
    Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
  31. I've always wondered by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    What happens when Netcraft dies?

    1. Re:I've always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      God dies and a million kitties mastur...errh, sorry.

  32. If you own the wires... by randolph · · Score: 1

    ...you can charge everyone else rent to use them, so all the VOIP providers have a problem. But that doesn't even come into play here; thanks to the wonders of deregulation we are right back in the Bad Old Days of unregulated monopoly; the telcos simply don't carry--or distort--traffic they don't like.

  33. java ftw by snark23 · · Score: 1

    On a mostly unrelated note, parent post led me to the OpenNMS web page, and in turn the OpenNMS "live" demo... which appears to have been Slashdotted or something. In its smoking crater is now a lovely error message:

    org.apache.jasper.JasperException: FATAL: sorry, too many clients already
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.handle JspException(JspServletWrapper.java:510)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.servic e(JspServletWrapper.java:375)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFil e(JspServlet.java:314)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspSe rvlet.java:264)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:802)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.inv oke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:672)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doI nclude(ApplicationDispatcher.java:574)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.inc lude(ApplicationDispatcher.java:499)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.includ e(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:966)
    at org.apache.jsp.index_jsp._jspService(index_jsp.jav a:53)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(Http JspBase.java:97)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:802)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.servic e(JspServletWrapper.java:332)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFil e(JspServlet.java:314)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspSe rvlet.java:264)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:802)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
    at org.extremecomponents.table.filter.AbstractExportF ilter.doFilter(AbstractExportFilter.java:49)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
    at org.opennms.web.AddRefreshHeaderFilter.doFilter(Ad dRefreshHeaderFilter.java:73)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
    at org.opennms.web.StoreRequestPropertiesFilter.doFil ter(StoreRequestPropertiesFilter.java:71)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.j

  34. Short term selfish gains by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    if I call tech support I tell them I've got my cable modem plugged directly into my Windows XP

    And that's why they say nobody on their networks uses Linux, so it's not worth supporting.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)