Slashdot Mirror


Can You Handle 'THEY'?

In a refreshing turn, over at Newsweek's LevelUp blog N'Gai has some suitably chastising commentary on the newly-announced FPS entitled simply THEY. This overly-simplistic name is accompanied by a nearly informationless press release, and reinforces the idea that whatever THEY is, it's not worth looking into. "Generally, the role of a press release is to inform. But having read the THEY press release, all we've taken away from it is hyperbole and buzzwords, assembled Mad Libs-style for maximum unintended hilarity. What is THEY? Apparently, THEY is a 'next generation mystery first person shooter for PC and next generation consoles.' Who are THEY, you ask? ''THEY' are huge--'THEY' are different--'THEY' are hostile!' How good will THEY be? It's 'so mysterious, so stunning and so amazing--that 'THEY' might become one of the most anticipated world premiere titles from this year's Games Convention!'"

100 comments

  1. Where did I hear that before... SEGWAY by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Funny
    OH YEAH, when THEY were talking about the little electric scooter wither a strange control system that THEY thought would 'revolutionize' travel.

    Turned out to be a joke THEY called Segway.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Where did I hear that before... SEGWAY by Paktu · · Score: 1

      I remember when it was first getting discussed (under the code name "Ginger") they were talking about how it would "revolutionize transportation in cities" and a lot of people, myself included, thought it might be a personal jetpack. When the product materialized, it was a huge letdown and almost no one wanted to shell out five grand for one.

    2. Re:Where did I hear that before... SEGWAY by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      You did not experience the Segway publicity machine.

      At one point, Segway specific denied that they had teleportation.

      Now, I doubt that anyone seriously believed they had teleportation, but there was so much publicity that someone actually asked them about it.

      In other words, they were putting out enough moronic doubletalking hype that intelligent people were thinking maybe they had really done a major breakthrough and could do something like a jetpack.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  2. From the makers of... by Senjutsu · · Score: 5, Funny

    gabbo Gabbo GABBO

    1. Re:From the makers of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:From the makers of... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1


      gabbo Gabbo GABBO



      "He'll tell us what to do!"
      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    3. Re:From the makers of... by eriklou · · Score: 1

      Wow, thats a classic!

      -2 to the mod who missed the reference.

    4. Re:From the makers of... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Wow, pretty cool... you can do anything at zombo.com!

    5. Re:From the makers of... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Wow, thats a classic!

      -2 to the mod who missed the reference. http://gabbogabbogabbo.com/

      Here, I dug up the fucking link and I still don't get the reference. This is like one of those internet memes, only not funny.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:From the makers of... by physicsnick · · Score: 1

      You found the wrong reference.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabbo

    7. Re:From the makers of... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Anything anything? No way. I mean, I'm sure there must be some limits to the possibilities at Zombo.com.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    8. Re:From the makers of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!

      The infinite is possible... at Zombo.com!
      The unattainable is unknown at Zombo.com!

    9. Re:From the makers of... by Dutch_Cap · · Score: 1

      The only limit is yourself.

    10. Re:From the makers of... by illeism · · Score: 1

      ...each carried a huge funnel and I realized with horror that I'd seen this awful thing before... Where did you get your sig from?
      I found this but there is little info aside from saying it's a song
      Giant fighting machines with funnels...
      --
      Help test the /. effect at my min
    11. Re:From the makers of... by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      ...and I always feel welcome there...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  3. Features? by Paktu · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the feature list: unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons what the fuck does that mean?

    1. Re:Features? by dr_strang · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the feature list: unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons what the fuck does that mean?
      If it means what it sounds like it means, that's seriously creepy.
      --
      This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
    2. Re:Features? by Kesch · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is my BFG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
      My BFG is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
      My BFG, without me, is useless. Without my BFG, I am useless. I must fire my BFG true. I must shoot straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will...
      My BFG and myself know that what counts in this war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit...
      My BFG is human, even as I, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strengths, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will ever guard it against the ravages of weather and damage as I will ever guard my legs, my arms, my eyes and my heart against damage. I will keep my BFG clean and ready. We will become part of each other. We will...
      Before God, I swear this creed. My BFG and myself are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life...
      So be it, until victory is humanity's and there is no enemy, but peace!

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    3. Re:Features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Features? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I immediately thought of Full Metal Jacket when the GP mentioned "loving" your weapons. Also, don't forget:

      This is my weapon.
      This is my gun.
      This is for fighting.
      This is for fun.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Features? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      From the feature list: unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons what the fuck does that mean? I don't want to see what their idea of a BFG is. Oozinator, anyone?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:Features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It goes:

      This is my rifle.
      This is my gun. ...

      You missed the whole point of the drill, which is to pick up the correct and precise designations of the equipment and armament, which is essential for efficient, terse and comprehensive communication in the battle, without too much explaining (like this) over the channel. "Gun" can mean a lot of things, from pistol to cannon and that much ambiguity is unacceptable in armed forces communications. Rifle, OTOH, is a firearm with long, rifled barrel, basic infantry weapon.

    7. Re:Features? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      If it means what it sounds like it means, that's seriously creepy.

      If anyone brags about banging Charlene, I'm outt'a here.

    8. Re:Features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of this guy.

    9. Re:Features? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I knew it was rifle, but for some reason my hands typed weapon. Probably because I had just finished writing weapon in the previous sentence.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Features? by davermont · · Score: 1

      If it means what it sounds like it means, that's seriously creepy. Kind of makes you re-think what BFG means, doesn't it?
    11. Re:Features? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      From the feature list: unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons what the fuck does that mean?

      Ahem....allow me to explain, as succinctly as possible:

      "This is MY BOOM STICK!!"...and..."It's pump action for a reason, baby".

      Actually, not a frigging clue, and don't wanna know because then someone would have to explain squibs and
      feed jams and using that wire brush (SHUDDER!)...no, not gonna go there.
      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    12. Re:Features? by Trails · · Score: 1

      I'm still wondering what "mysterious science fiction background story" implies. Does that mean there are three silhouettes in the bottom right hand corner of the screen making wise cracks?

      [At the end of the game]
      Crow T. Robot: Well, a good thing about the game was it wasn't any longer.
      Joel: And a bad thing?
      Crow T. Robot: It was this long.

  4. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    but I bet I could handle Them.

  5. Another movie license game? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is the game They based at all on the 2002 horror film titled They ?

    1. Re:Another movie license game? by westlake · · Score: 3, Interesting
      based on the 2002 horror film titled They

      Production Costs $17 million
      Theatrical Gross $13 million

      Amazon.com Sales Rank: #43,832 in DVD

      a low budget, high-concept, Lovecraftian horror flick that still managed to lose money.

    2. Re:Another movie license game? by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd buy it if THEY based it on THEY LIVE! and I get to play as Robertson Piper, esq.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    3. Re:Another movie license game? by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      I'd buy it if THEY based it on THEY LIVE! and I get to play as Robertson Piper, esq.

      THEY were going to, but unfortunately, THEY ran out of bubblegum...

      (If you don't get the reference, watch the movie.)

    4. Re:Another movie license game? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      or just play Duke Nukem 3d - the line is virtually identical.

      oh heck - **** spoiler ****

      Duke Nukem (Duke):
      It's time to kick ass and chew bubble gum, and I'm all outta gum!

      They Live (Nada/"Rowdy" Roddy Piper):
      I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and I'm all out of bubblegum.

      esquire - heh, probably not as in lawyer (as commonly used in the US)...

  6. Marketing: Salaried Intoxication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I guess we need to find some guy named Turok and ask him what he thinks about this.

  7. Nothing to see here by quarrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there much point in posting a /. article, trying to inform your fellow geeks, that there is something they've never heard of, and it looks like it isn't worth paying any attention to?

    I already know there is lots of useless crap in the world that I'm not interested in. Tell me about things that ARE interesting.

    --Q

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Well now we've been informed that They aren't worth looking into so that when the dupe, follow-up, it's dupe, and the angry letter are posted on /. we can avoid them. That way you get to see more interesting things, like another article on the iPhone or Vista which are obviously interesting! Isn't it a great plan?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    2. Re:Nothing to see here by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Is there much point in posting a /. article, trying to inform your fellow geeks, that there is something they've never heard of, and it looks like it isn't worth paying any attention to?

      I already know there is lots of useless crap in the world that I'm not interested in. Tell me about things that ARE interesting. Word of note: Icy-Hot genital rubdowns, not a good idea. Just in case you WERE interested.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:Nothing to see here by Observador · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I happen to remember that many, many, many years ago some magazine editor decided to rag on some company that had sent the magazine some doodads. The doodads weren't even promoting a game! Instead they were announcing the creation of a new videogame company. The doodad was actually a knick knack with a bloody brain in it (or something like that) with the name of the company printed visibly on it. For some reason this irked the game magazine editor, and he proceeded to expound, on said magazine's editorial, on how gimmicky the whole affair was, and what a loser of a company this was going to be.

      For some reason, Croal's post reminded me of that editorial... And I will tell you this: PR is PR, that's why we have hot babes selling beer and spam emails to make our dicks longer. But in the end, the game will stand alone and speak for itself, gamers will either love it or hate it.

      You see, that company the magazine editor ragged on? A couple of years later it went on to release Grand Theft Auto for the PS2, and arguably single-handedly brought open-ended sandbox gaming to the masses...

      --
      I wish I could filter out the annoying Pickens articles...
    4. Re:Nothing to see here by jadin · · Score: 1

      And now you know... the REST of the story!

    5. Re:Nothing to see here by Floritard · · Score: 1

      Stop bitching. The real point of the article is how marketting has gotten just as out of hand in the world of video games as it has in just about every other mature industry. This is something that should be interesting to you if you care about the current diseased state of our beloved hobby.

    6. Re:Nothing to see here by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Tell me about things that ARE interesting.

      Hopefully it may yet entertain you, my liege...

      A company is spending lots of money in order to tell people about their product, but when they pull in a willing audience who actually pays attention to the advertisement, the audience still has no clue as to what is being talked about? They're spending time, energy, money, (all valuable), in actually convincing the public that, as a company, they don't even know how to do business? How does this instill confidence in the customer OR the investor?

  8. THEY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, it's so sneaky and subversive and utterly contrived, that THEY got Zonk to post about it. Way to go.

    Maybe Bush and/or The Jews are behind it?!

  9. Kill Bugs! Kill Bugs! Kill More Bugs! by Animats · · Score: 1

    From the pictures, it looks vaguely like Starship Troopers. "The only good Bug is a dead Bug".

    1. Re:Kill Bugs! Kill Bugs! Kill More Bugs! by Spikeles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the first picture in the article looks ripped from Half Life 2, looking at The Citadel. The second picture looks like they took a monster from Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  10. Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, this is a post informing us of news that we don't want to look into, am I right? Then why is it even on Slashdot? So that we don't look into it? Geez.

    1. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Actually, none of this exists; it's all just a fig newton of your amalgamation. ;)

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  11. Birds and the Guns by SnowNinja · · Score: 1

    Well son, when a man and his gun love each other veeery much...

    1. Re:Birds and the Guns by Virak · · Score: 1

      Birds and the Guns
      That's Duck Hunt, silly.
  12. And then... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...'THEY' will be soon forgotten...

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  13. From the ALL CAPS Department by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny

    THEY are no match for BLAZEMONGER! In fact, HIM, HER, US, THEM and THEY are still no match for BLAZEMONGER!

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:From the ALL CAPS Department by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rumors are floating about that THEY is actually a REMAKE of BLAZEMONGER - with TWICE THE SPEED. TWICE THE ACTION. TWICE THE FIREPOWER. It is SO hard you will lose without even BUYING the game!

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  14. wow by Doddman · · Score: 1

    that thing in the picture in the middle of the city looks like a half-life 2 citadel wannabe

    --
    If creativity is the field, copyright is the fence.
  15. Vaporware by sykopomp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please label this as vaporware. 'THEY' sound more like they're trying to sell me a Phantom than actually trying to make a good game. Expected Release Date: Holiday Season 09/0ALWAYS BET ON DUKE

  16. Loving your weapons by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    So... if THEY publish this for Wii - will the gameplay and controls for boys be different from those for girls?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  17. As the web-banner already says... by huckda · · Score: 1

    Slashdot News for nerds. Stuff that matters.
    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  18. Will they port THEY to the Wii? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they making this only for the PC? Wouldn't they get a lot of press via bad jokes if they ported THEY to the Wii?

    Besides, Wii controller seems like it might be interesting on an FPS.

    1. Re:Will they port THEY to the Wii? by ZachMG · · Score: 1

      i agree, i am currently using my wiimote as a mouse along with the nunchuck on my pc and playing CS:S with this is amazing. it makes gameplay so much easier and i regularly get blamed for cheating.

      --
      There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum. --Arthur C. Clarke
  19. Article LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice the "heavy usage of physics" feature in the article? Oh man, I smell a cult classic in the making. Am I the only one who thinks that the screenshot looks like they're using the Source engine?

    BTW: the image validation for this post is "giggle". Oh the irony...

  20. What is the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all abstract, informationless advertisements lead to bad products. Sometimes they get it just right enough to slide by and then follow it up with crap.

  21. Say what you want, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they got the press attention they wanted, didn't they.

    1. Re:Say what you want, but... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      ... they got the press attention they wanted, didn't they.


      So did Daikatana, didn't they?
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    2. Re:Say what you want, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah so? a AAA title that no one has ever heard of, won't sell either. This could be a turd. Chances are it is a turd, but the point was the company GOT what they HOPED FOR: Exposure! (That's the point of a press release!)

      (Why are people so incapable of seeing the business side of things?)

    3. Re:Say what you want, but... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      yeah so? a AAA title that no one has ever heard of, won't sell either. This could be a turd. Chances are it is a turd, but the point was the company GOT what they HOPED FOR: Exposure! (That's the point of a press release!)


      Dude, the question isn't whether exposure is good and bad, but whether you get the kind of PR you actually want. Exposure is only good when it doesn't cause you lost sales in the process.

      Bad exposure is damn easy to get. Just do something extremely stupid, or have your product fail in a spectacular way. That'll get you headlines. Or just pull a "<insert name> will make you his bitch" again, and you might slapped by a similar backlash again. That's not the kind of exposure sane companies want though.

      What you don't seem to understand is, really, where the zero point is. No PR doesn't mean "zero, it can't get any worse than that." An AAA title that noone heard much about will still be on the shelves at WallMart, will still be sent to a ton of reviews site, it will still be listed on Amazon, and will still have people posting about it or telling their friends about it. So some amount of exposure will be there anyway. I'm not saying that that's necessarily enough, but I'm saying there's room to do even worse than that. If you give people the message, basically, "stay away from these arse-clowns", you can actually do worse than if you didn't do a press release at all.

      And even if you didn't get something that horrible, there's a whole continuum of reactions and effects you can get. You'll want to get people not only to hear the company or game name, but hopefully also get them interested in it. If you can have a choice between giving people the right message and the wrong message, you'd have to be a dolt to deliberately choose the second. The first also gets you, basically, some marketing on top of the exposure, the latter can lose you as many potential customers as it got you. Or as said before, it can occasionally actually lose you more customers.

      (Why are people so incapable of seeing the business side of things?)


      Actually, are _you_ capable? No offense, but I have trouble taking anyone seriously when they operate with grossly-oversimplified canned wisecracks as their grand insight into any domain, marketing included.
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  22. Next generation consoles? Wow... by gumpish · · Score: 1

    next generation mystery first person shooter for PC and next generation consoles
    Next generation consoles? Wow, they're definitely getting a jump on the competition. I don't think I've heard any other announcements for the PS4, XBox 720 or Wiii.
    1. Re:Next generation consoles? Wow... by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Wiii.

      Wrong. Nintendo's next game console will clearly be called "Biiver".

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  23. Acronyms by immel · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, there was a "Pinky and the Brain" episode in which the lab mice tried to join an illuminati-style international conspiracy group called "T.H.E.Y.". THEY consisted of world leaders (Bill Clinton and the like).

    Even the name was an elaborate cover-up designed to deceive the public. It was an acronym; I think the "Y" stood for "Yodelers".

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
  24. Sigh... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Title: THEY
    Platforms: PC & next generation console
    Release date: 2008/2009
    Genre: First person mystery shooter
    Scenario: Near Future
    * next generation 3D engine
    * unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons
    * mysterious science fiction background story
    * diversified enemies--thrilling and intelligent
    * heroes to identify with
    * heavy usage of physics
    * destructible environment relevant for gameplay
    * haunting single player mode
    * versatile multiplayer modes

    Honestly, this pretentious crap needs to end. This doesn't make me want to purchase or play the game. Sure it's an announcement but honestly, every single buzzword is touted for every FPS game when they come out. Besides, it looks like a third-grader wrote this for a book report and copied the box on game. It provides just enough information to sound real but not enough to be useful, like this up and coming game from downtown ATL.

    Title: Protecting and Analyzing the Next-gen Transportation System (PANTS)
    Platforms: PC & next generation console
    Release date: 2008/2009
    Genre: First person strategy thriller
    Scenario: Present Time
    * next generation 3D engine
    * unique tactics system that makes you "love" planning
    * politically-charged background story
    * diversified citizens--pissed off and delayed
    * support characters with realistic backgrounds
    * mild usage of physics
    * adaptive environment relevant for gameplay
    * intellectually challenging single player mode
    * variety of multiplayer modes
    1. Re:Sigh... by Wolf+von+Niflheim · · Score: 1


      Apart from your comment being filled with truth, it also managed to make me nearly fall from my chair in laughter. Nice satire, thumbs up :-)

      --
      In Soviet Russia elephant rides you!
    2. Re:Sigh... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      * unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons

      I find it's ok to "love" your weapons, but not to love your weapons. Maintain some distance, you know.

    3. Re:Sigh... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      But I wonder when "geeks" are so hostile towards any tech company, game related especially, without that multi-million dollar veneer. It's not until an "indie" gets published by Sony does it become hip enough to look into (Guitar Hero, Katamari, etc) I'm hostile because I would love to see information on this game instead of a bullshit promo. There is no useful information in this game description. I know it's an introduction to a concept but their approach is far too pretentious for me at this point. I want more information than a marketing profile... give me information that I can actually get interested in... more than a promo and two pictures (one is a conceptual picture)

      Your earlier comments share my perspective as well. My point is simple: give me information in your game announcement. Simply claiming that "THEY" will dominate everything is not enough! I don't want marketing BS hype; I want something to get me excited in your IP. Bioshock, Spore, The Witcher.. these games interest me, they make me excited about the next timeframe until they exist. "THEY"'s information makes me bored with marketing speak. It's the equivalent of them depositing "stuff" into a bag and trying to sell me bags of gold.

      I consider myself open-minded on entertainment (I've reached the point of TV show concepts I hate result in my watching them and end up enjoying them.. ie: Burn Notice, BSG, Psych). But I want to see something about what is going on. I understand that they want to keep some secrets but I don't want promises or guarantees; I want to see gameplay and concepts when/as/while they are developed. I want to see reasons for delay, example: Spore is delayed because of problem X and here is an example. I can see where they are struggling and why and enjoy their work to improve their process. I want to see something about this game they are trying to sell me conceptually. If you give me marketing speak, I will give you hostility; I don't consider myself a number but someone you have to actually earn as a customer.
  25. Reminds me of a vehicle I heard about once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is "IT"? What does "IT" do? And when will IT be somewhere where I can buy one?

    1. Re:Reminds me of a vehicle I heard about once... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      "IT" happens.

  26. Shooting Aliens... with paintball guns? by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else see a resemblance between the weapon pictured in the screenshot and a paintball gun? Are these guys afraid of Jack Thompson or something?

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  27. Ironically by king-manic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Their critical knock against their marketing drew a ton more publicity then it deserves. I'm really hoping there is a comical back lash and NO ONE will pick up a copy to punish this lazy PR.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  28. 1-18-08 by Trikenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    slash Cloverfield seems to be doing it's job of causing interest.
    Maybe They (Newsweek) just don't *get it*.

  29. In Soviet Russia by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Funny

    THEY can handle YOU

    just to get that out of the way. And for once, the grammar nazis won't even wince.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  30. Obligatory 80's reference. by dannycim · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...''THEY' are huge ...

    The might be giants? ::ducks::

  31. As a jerky boy once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Pickle THEY!

  32. So by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    Did THEY rename Duke Nukem Forever?

  33. Refreshing! by Vacardo · · Score: 0

    Words like 'refreshing', on my Slashdot? It's more likely than you think!

  34. Yes, but will THEY buy the game? by MikShapi · · Score: 1

    And will THEY ship before DNF?!

    THEY did not say.

    --
    -
  35. Well, yes and no by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, yes and no.

    Yes in that indeed it doesn't actually tell you anything that you'd base a buying decision on.

    No, in that it's another somewhat comical (and somewhat sad) example of bad marketing and press releases that sound like they were generated by the Dilbert Mission Statement Generator, or a variant thereof. You know, the stuff that we all like to make fun of.

    And it also shows at least one reaction to such crap, and it's not a positive one. It turns out that there _is_ such thing as bad publicity.

    It's not exactly a new revelation, though. We've seen stuff like that before. Daikatana was massively torpedoed by the backlash to its own dumbly-worded marketing hype. And I forget the name now, but there was another game where a dumb PR hack thought he'd build buzz by causing a scandal with "leaked" information claiming that the game contains all sorts of moral abominations (especially to a non-gamer)... which didn't even exist in the game. Unfortunately the reaction was such that the publisher preferred to cancel the game rather than deal with it.

    And then there are the less known cases where a company paid big bucks for, say, a funky company name (a few years back the hype had hit big time that some modern day shamen can construct for you a company or product name that's just short of pure magic, and causes all sorts of positive reactions and associations in people who hear it)... and then discovered that either it has no effect, or in a few cases that the test audience finds it repulsive or obscene. It actually happened. 'Course, then there are those which didn't test it first.

    Etc.

    Why is it important for nerds? Because for a lot of us our job depends on some marketer selling it. And it turns out that a dumb marketer can do more harm than good. Imagine your job depending on one of _these_ destructive press releases or PR campaigns.

    And considering that he has the social skills to sell his ideas to the boss, while a lot of us nerds are more fluent in C++ than in our mother tongue... "do not be alarmed. Be very, very frightened, Arthur Dent."

    Don't get me wrong, intelligent and competent marketing is good and I think most of us can respect a competent professional in any domain. But it's also a domain where success is so hard to measure, and there are plenty of bogus metrics with which the incompetents and dishonest pricks can justify their salary. (E.g., a fake UI campaign tends to be counted as a success based on the number of clicks, even though most just result in annoyed potential customers and chances are you didn't raise their interest in your product at all.) And there are a lot which... well, let's put it like this: when you select people based on their ability to be dishonest and sell crap, don't be surprised when they lie to your face and their main interest is in selling themselves.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  36. THEY by taff^2 · · Score: 1

    ... sound like THEY are blowing smoke up your arses!

    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
  37. what they mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    let's do some translation:

    Title: THEY = hey, naming a game FEAR was a good idea, let's do something similar!
    Release date: 2008/2009 = 2009/2010/2011/2012/...
    Genre: First person mystery shooter = what was I saying about FEAR?
    Scenario: Near Future = either that or WWII ...
    * next generation 3D engine = ooooh, shiny screenshots
    * unique weapon system that makes you "love" your weapons = ... no comments ...
    * mysterious science fiction background story = [unable to translate, gibberish]
    * diversified enemies--thrilling and intelligent = they can DUCK
    * heroes to identify with = what, do we play a computer geek?
    * heavy usage of physics = wow, gravity
    * destructible environment relevant for gameplay = only the scripted cracks in walls
    * haunting single player mode = i FEAR this may be a ripoff
    * versatile multiplayer modes = CTF, deathmath

  38. Obnoxious viral ad campaign by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    ...So in other words it's an obnoxious viral advertising campaign, and you're falling right into it.

  39. re: by Xenothaulus · · Score: 1

    THEY is about to make you his bitch.

  40. But always remember: Nothing is as it seems! by greedyturtle · · Score: 1

    "THEY" features a technically future minded 3D engine with next generation effects, brand new gameplay elements and a revolutionary weapon system to survive the challenges ahead! But always remember: Nothing is as it seems! It might SEEM that way, but it's really features an untechnical, past-minded 1D engine, with last generation effects, old gamplay elements and a (my favorite) a "non-revolving" weapon system to fail to survive the lack of challenges ahead!

    1. Re:But always remember: Nothing is as it seems! by CogDissident · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd be impressed by a game with a 1D engine. One dimension is very hard to work with.

  41. It worked by Pen420 · · Score: 1

    Apparently their non informational ploy worked as their seems to be several articles about it. The user responses seem to be quite a large amount as well. They couldn't have asked for better advertising.

  42. Then again... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    'so mysterious, so stunning and so amazing--that 'THEY' might become one of the most anticipated world premiere titles from this year's Games Convention!'

    Then again, it might not.

    1. Re:Then again... by Hellpop · · Score: 0

      Well, can't say I didn't see this day coming. Most movie trailers tell you jack shit about the movie any more. You see come face shots, a couple explosions, some running, but no mention of plot, story or direction (I'm not referring to Director direction, but story direction, indirectly.).
      I don't watch those movies. I won't play those games.

      --
      "People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything."
  43. Is John Romero working on this? by cloudwilliam · · Score: 1

    Is John Romero working on this one? I'm still waiting to be his bitch.

  44. OB Firefly quote by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

    Jayne: This has a name, I call her Vera

  45. No, They patented ground-effect lighting. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    You've got your pronouns/inventors mixed up. Dean Kamen's Segway was known as "It." "They" is the legal name of the guy that invented ground-effect lighting and sunglasses with shades over them.

    I remember him from an NPR interview.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  46. 80s?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because I'm a nerd...they only had TWO albums in the 80s, they had SIX in the 90s, and they have had FOUR since 2000...so...80s reference? (Their best known work comes from the 90s anyway...)

  47. THEY killed Kenny by aszaidi · · Score: 1

    "Who are THEY?"
    "THEY're bastards. THEY killed Kenny"