Slashdot Mirror


Sun's Trading Symbol Going From SUNW To JAVA

Mortimer.CA writes "Straight from Jonathan Schwartz's weblog, Sun is changing their ticker symbol from SUNW to JAVA: 'JAVA is a technology whose value is near infinite to the internet, and a brand that's inseparably a part of Sun (and our profitability). [...] To be very clear, this isn't about changing the company name or focus — we are Sun, we are a systems company, and we will always be a derivative of the students that created us, Stanford University Network is here to stay. But we are no longer simply a workstation company, nor a company whose products can be limited by one category — and Java does a better job of capturing exactly that sentiment than any other four letter symbol.'"

47 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Not sure if this is a good idea by jpfed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm... while many programmers are powered by java, all life on Earth is powered at least indirectly by the Sun.

    1. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by abolitiontheory · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, what next? Microsoft changes their ticker to SUCK?

    2. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they don't have a product named SUCK.

      It'll be "C#" or ".NET". Sure, some of those characters may not be allowed, but with a little of the green lubricant, which MS has more than enough to spare, I'm sure wall street will be willing to have it's gears greased in taht direction.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    3. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      They may not have a product _named_ SUCK, but they do have the ZUNE. That's got four letters and describes Microsoft almost as well as JAVA describes Sun.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by hedleyroos · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... all life on Earth is powered at least indirectly by the Sun

      You've obviously never seen our sys admin. Gaah, you said indirectly and ruined my joke!

    5. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, BSOD.

    6. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by brusk · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then they could go from SUCK to BLOW.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    7. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by squoozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought at least some of the life around under sea thermal vents was powered by the hear from the earths core which, if I'm not mistaken, comes primarily from radioactive decay deep within the Earth and has nothing to do with the sun. The radioactive material did come from a star though so you could argue that all (known) life derives it's energy from stars in one way or another.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    8. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    9. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly, the New York Stock Exchange has reserved the stock symbol M for Microsoft, if they ever jump ship from Nasdaq.

      http://invest-faq.com/articles/triv-one-letter-tic k.html

    10. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by quanticle · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was the rumor. However, recently, the NYSE gave symbol M to Macy's Inc. (department store chain). I think they realized that Microsoft wasn't going to leave the NASDAQ.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    11. Re:Not sure if this is a good idea by chuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm apparently a lousy researcher!

  2. Uhm. by John_Booty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "we are [not] a company whose products can be limited by one category"


    So instead of naming themselves after one product category, they're naming themselves after another. Great! The name change makes some sense (who really wants the outdated "workstation" thing attached to their name?) but marketingspeak is just so silly sometimes.

    Can't help but think they'll want to do this gain once Java is no longer their flagship product. If they're still around (and I hope they are!)
    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    1. Re:Uhm. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I was under the impression that SUNW was a more respectable name. Workstation gives the suggestion of serious computer power.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:Uhm. by peterprior · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it stands for Standford University NetWorks... :)

    3. Re:Uhm. by John_Booty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For customers, maybe, but not for investors - and they're the ones that will see the ticker symbol. The workstation market is near-nonexistent. "Workstations" harken to the days of $10,000 desktop computers like the NeXT Cube and the like. Former workstation companies like SGI have collapsed financially and are scrambling to try and find other ways to make money.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    4. Re:Uhm. by Otter · · Score: 2

      I had periodically wondered what the W stood for but had never connected it with "workstation", and doubt if many investors had. (Anyway, other posters are claiming plausibly that the link to "workstation" isn't even correct.)

    5. Re:Uhm. by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 2, Informative

      SUNW (The stock ticker symbol) = Stanford University Network Workstation.

      Sun (the company) = Sun Microsystems.

    6. Re:Uhm. by ednopantz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the platform company that spent the 1990s evangelizing a language that makes it easy to write platform independent code.

      Java may be nice, but it was a butt-stupid move for a company that made its money in OSes and hardware.

    7. Re:Uhm. by nuzak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Train stations are where trains come to a stop. My desk has a workstation.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  3. Get a website or something by florin · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news, Steve Balmer was spotted replacing his previous 'ZUNE4ME' vanity plates with a fresh set which sports the slogan 'JAVAL0L'..

    Seriously though, I don't think Java is a particularly big reason for people to like Sun, and tying your company's future to it seems ill-advised.

  4. It's only the stock ticker by stony3k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I agree that this sounds silly, do remember that it's just the stock symbol. There are many companies with silly stock symbols (GLW, T, F). I guess they feel that more people will buy their stocks if the name sounds familiar.

    Basically, nothing to see here.

    --
    Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. - Mahatma Gandhi
    1. Re:It's only the stock ticker by brajesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      AAPL -> JOBS?

      --
      95% of all sigs are made up.
    2. Re:It's only the stock ticker by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And to think, this is being reported from a company whose stock ticker is LNUX, who doesn't do Linux hardware (or software) any more, that specializes in Online Media.

      --

      I disable sigs...do you?
    3. Re:It's only the stock ticker by guardian-ct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With stocks that low though, if you buy 10000 shares at 0.35, it may double in price while you're buying, because you're buying it. Then when you go to sell it at 0.7, during the sale the price falls because you just sold 10000 shares. Investing in penny stocks is a great way to lose money.

  5. Packages by HaydnH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As all of the Solaris packages start with the companies ticker, will all future Sun packages now be called JAVAxxxxx? That's going to annoy the hell out of us sys admins =/ Haydn.

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  6. Microsoft is changing their's too... by AccUser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Look out for BSOD on a stock ticker near you. Unless you are running a real operating system, that is.

    --

    Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

  7. four letter symbols by OnyxLilninja · · Score: 2, Funny

    But we are no longer simply a workstation company, nor a company whose products can be limited by one category -- and Java does a better job of capturing exactly that sentiment than any other four letter symbol. I can think of some four letter symbols that express the sentiment a bit better...
  8. The full quote regarding Sun's symbol change by lancejjj · · Score: 5, Funny

    The quote was truncated. Here it is in its totality:

    "But we are no longer simply a workstation company, nor a company whose products can be limited by one category -- and Java does a better job of capturing exactly that sentiment than any other four letter symbol.

    Our first choice was the even more accurate DEAD, but that symbol was already taken by Emerson Burial Caskets."

    1. Re:The full quote regarding Sun's symbol change by dwarfking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Java is not dead or dying, regardless what many on /. like to say. There are basically two primary platforms now for custom in-house business development: Java and .NET.

      Businesses that are predominately Windows based (desktops, servers, SQL Server, etc) find the holistic approach of .NET and the Visual Studio tool suite (which is a decent development environment) to be the best model for them. Businesses that are more heterogeneous tend to use Java more. You are likely to find very few businesses trusting application development to Python, Ruby, TCL or the next big thing. You might see use of PHP for web front ends, though DHTML/AJAX front ends are becoming very common, but usually business logic is either in Java or .NET.

      It seems the folks on /. have a problem with Java for the very reason that it is accepted by businesses. There is a strong anti-business, anti-management sentiment here, to the point that anything actually liked by business (i.e. PHBs) must by definition be bad.

      Java is a designed environment, has recommended approaches to use, has corporate support from tools vendors. In other words, it isn't intended to be a quick and dirty tool, it is intended for serious, business critical software development. As others have pointed out, it actually does run on multiple operating systems as advertised.

      It must be the hacker (in the original sense) mentality that permeates /. and makes folks favor scripting languages like Ruby and Python over Java. It is possible one of these other languages/platforms will overtake Java's position in business, if they get solid base libraries and tool vendor backing, but until then Java is not dead.

  9. Re:in another news... by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft's symbol becomes EVIL

  10. Perhaps they're trying to increase share price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...because in my experience, Java increases the size of things by at least 25%.

  11. Unfathomable. by MythMoth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm a developer who uses Java almost exclusively these days. I enjoy working with the language, and I think it's the cat's PJs when putting together big enterprise sites. And I think this move is... stupid. BUT I'm a developer, so I know nothing of the mystical ways of marketing. It might all be BS or there might be something in it; I don't really care all that much.

    However, I do take substantial issue with one thing that Schwartz said, which I think is pretty badly thought out:

    As for working professionals, I had dinner with a financial analyst a few months ago who said he saw the Java launch experience "a few times a day" when accessing intranet applications - as did tens of thousands of his fellow employees. He's basically saying: "We shove a splash screen in users faces every day". This is a Bad Thing! He's making users associate Java with applications that have poor performance - by definition if they're seeing this they're not getting to the application they want to work on as quickly as they should. The poor performance (web server performance) is out of their hands, but it's in their control to prevent the association with their brand!

    I have high regards for Sun employees in general. Their management, however, I have my doubts about.
    --
    --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    1. Re:Unfathomable. by cmat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ya know, something I've always found bizarre about this "everyone thinks java has poor loading times" comment... most everyone that uses a computer and is not a programmer seems to look at the slow loading of any app as a "problem with my computer, hang on a sec, it's just loading now". So most of the time I would argue that the average user of such applications care more about overall performance slowdowns and almost never associate the real causes of slowdown to any particular factor.

      --
      -- Humans, because the hardware IS the software.
  12. /. questions are SO easy these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Who trades under "SUN"?

    Why, everyone under the SUN, of course!

  13. Should APPL become IPOD? Silliness. by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    GE does a lot of things besides manufacture light bulbs and generators. In fact they do a lot of things besides manufacturing light bulbs, generators, medical equipment, jet engines, finance, plastics, and railroad locomotives. Yet they feel no need to change their trading symbol.

    Does anyone think that it would help Apple to change its trading symbol from APPL to IPOD?

    Does AT&T worry that people will think telegraphs are old-fashioned?

    GE, Apple, and AT&T are just names. For better or worse, people know what these companies are, not because of the names, but because of the companies. And the trading symbol is one step further removed.

    SUN is an acronym for Stanford University Network. It should be a proud part of the company's heritage.

    Wanting to fiddle with the trading symbol is a sure sign of a company that has no idea of what its identity is or what it is or should be doing. It also indicates an unhealthy focus on the stock, rather than company's business itself.

  14. Re:The horse is dead, quit beating it. by Teckla · · Score: 3, Informative

    Java was doomed, from the first time anyone ever had to ask the question "which Java?"

    The most popular programming language on the planet is doomed?

    It failed on the "write-once, run anywhere" promise

    You mean, the Java programs I write that run on Linux, BSD, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, Windows, and AS/400 aren't actually working? You should have told me sooner! Maybe you can tell me how, exactly, they're not working, because they seem to be working fine!

    it failed on the security promise

    Because we hear about buffer overflow exploits in Java programs leaving your machine vulnerable all the time? Oh, wait. We almost never hear about those.

    and it failed on the "finally, you'll be free of win32" promise

    That's funny, it freed me from the Win32 API, and dozens upon dozens upon dozens of other developers I know.

    The ways that Sun screwed this pooch will be the subject of thousands of business-school term papers for years to come.

    Yeah, right. We'll look back and see how badly Java failed, because it only retained the #1 crown for a few decades (or more).

    You need a reality check.

  15. Re:The horse is dead, quit beating it. by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Absolutely agree about the popularity of Java - but I think that it's Java popularity with the Business side of the house as opposed to the Technical side which is the significant element.

    My guess is that Business loves Java because you can throw developers at a problem and be seen to be dealing with it - because there isn't a problem that cannot be solved by piling on the bodies, right?

    (Confession of bias: I like Java, don't love it - it's good enough).

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  16. Wait a sec.... by Churla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they don't want to just be associated with workstations, so they change their symbol to the name of one particular software product they produce. I boggle at this.

    Why not change the symbol to something like SunS (Sun Systems, oops taken), or SunT (...technologies) , or Sunn (...networking, but also taken...)

    You get the idea. Keep the identity they have as Sun, because that does carry recognition. Far more than I think they think Java does. It would be like MS changing their ticker to WNDZ or the federal government getting the ticker symbol DCMA...

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  17. Can SCO change theirs? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Funny

    If so, I have some suggestions:

    TOAST
    KAPUT
    DEAD
    MLTDN
    NOCSE
    PWNED <---- I hated to put that last one in there, but after the way the judge ruled against them and given their current situation, I think it applies nicely.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. LNUX by DogDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    This message is brought to you by "LNUX": A company that has nothing to do with "Linux" anymore, and has only made money by selling off pieces of itself. (Slashdot is owned by Sourceforge, which used to be VA Linux, etc.).

    In other words, changing their ticker name to "JAVA" doesn't necessarily bode well.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  19. Packages by ilikejam · · Score: 2, Funny

    # cd /shared/pkg
    # pkgadd -d . SUNWzlib
    pkgadd: ERROR: no package associated with <SUNWzlib>
    # ls | grep SUNW
    # ls | head
    JAVA1251f
    JAVA1394h
    JAVA1394x
    JAVA5ttf
    J AVA5xmft
    JAVA5xplx
    JAVAa2psr
    JAVAa2psu
    JAVAacc r
    JAVAaccu
    # echo Bastards
    Bastards
    # pkgadd -d . JAVAzlib
    Processing package instance <JAVAzlib> from ......

    --
    C-x C-s C-x k
  20. Re:I can't really pass judgement by stevesliva · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also is it just me or does it seem like with the IBM deal that SUN is wanting to get deeper entrenched in the software business IBM wants to start to get out of it?
    It's just you. IBM is the second-largest software company in the world, and software mints money.
    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  21. Well JAVA did make a pile of money ... by supersnail · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... only trouble is it made it for IBM not sun!

    IBM seem to be the only company capable of actually selling java based product.
    But then again they persuaded people to part with ready cash for Lotus Notes
    so it doesnt really say much about Java.

    I think SUN is desperate not to be seen a a hardware manufacturer becuase
    of its associantion with commodity products and declining profitability.

    However the only way to become a succesful software business is to SELL
    software to customers, which, SUN does not do at all well.

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  22. New Slogan? by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Funny

    Java: Brand Once, Market Everywhere.

  23. Linux by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I humbly suggest 'RTFM' for any of the big Linux vendors. :)

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  24. Re:s/Java/Microsoft/g by Maltheus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny how if you replace the original poster's user id from Teckla to mattgreen, you'd be arguing against yourself right now.

    What's your point?