Slashdot Mirror


Steve Fossett Missing

jd writes "Steve Fossett, the first person to fly a plane around the world without refueling, the first person to fly around the world in a balloon, and possibly the record-holder for the highest-altitude glider flight, is missing in Nevada. He is reported to have taken off in a light aircraft last night and has not been seen since. As he had filed no flight plan, would-be rescuers have no idea where to even begin looking. The plane took off from a private airstrip on a ranch at the south end of Smith Valley in western Nevada."

317 comments

  1. Gov't got him? by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did he fly over Area 51 or somewhere he shouldn't have?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Gov't got him? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, c'mon. All joking aside, there will be plenty of wild speculation. Let's apply Occam's Razor here and say that most likely, he probably crashed somewhere. He took off from a private airstrip unannounced. No one knew where he was going or even exactly when he left. He could be just about anywhere -- most likely on the ground in pieces.

    2. Re:Gov't got him? by AlienQueen · · Score: 0

      > All joking aside, there will be plenty of wild speculation. Let's apply Occam's Razor here and say that most likely, he probably crashed somewhere. Maybe you should try & apply your sense of humour first ! >8^)

    3. Re:Gov't got him? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      "Light aircraft" can be remarkably good gliders when they have to be. If he was in something like a Cessna the chances of surviving an engine failure are pretty good, although the chances of injury are equally high.

      So we've got a missing man, somewhere in a radius of about 500 miles, and a bunch of techies with computers. How do we get the most high-res and up to date satellite photos available?

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    4. Re:Gov't got him? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what they did when Jim Gray came up missing, especially since he's well liked by some of the best and brightest minds working in the information technology and computer science fields. Unfortunately, all of their best efforts have been, so far, to no avail, so they've suspended their efforts.

    5. Re:Gov't got him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flight plans are not required and it is not uncommon that they are not filed for short flights especially out of private airstrips. I do unfortunately agree with your conclusion hopefully I am wrong

    6. Re:Gov't got him? by mediocris · · Score: 1

      Occam,'s razor is almost always best. The fact that the searchers have spent a week looking in the desert without success makes me think he might have flown in another direction. Why did he fly in another direction? When I was learning to fly I was warned about CO poisoning. It's colorless, odorless, and tasteless. An engine manifold that is loose could be the cause. He would be drowsy and disoriented until he lost consciousness. The plane would either fly straight and level, if the plane was 100% stable, or it would climb until it reached a specific altitude and eventually run out of fuel. If it was a little unstable it would descend, or go into a descending spiral. The result is that the wreckage could be anywhere within its max range. I think the desert in the west has been eliminated. Another possibility is medical. The man was in his 60's. He could have had a stroke or a heart attack. The result would be the same as above.

  2. Flight Plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't need no stinkin flight plan.

    1. Re:Flight Plan? by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      I don't need no stinkin flight plan. What is the first rule of Fight Plane...
      thats right it is you don't talk about Fight Plane!

      oh I read it as:

      I don't need no stinkin FIGHT PLANE .
  3. The obvious by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aliens. Probably the same ones that took Earhart.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:The obvious by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aliens abudcted a racecar driver?

    2. Re:The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnt it 50 years since she went? I bet its a publicity stunt.

    3. Re:The obvious by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      No...its like 70 years and a couple of months since she went missing...

    4. Re:The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean The Ones Before, or the Shadow?

      (Bob Mayer reference under the Greg Donegan pen name, for those who don't get it)

    5. Re:The obvious by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aliens abudcted a racecar driver? No, GP is obviously referring to Dr. Larry Erhardt - who mysteriously disappeared from Deep 13 and was later eaten by a giant spider.
      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    6. Re:The obvious by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      GP is obviously referring to Dr. Larry Erhardt

      More likely Amelia Earhart

    7. Re:The obvious by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      GP is obviously referring to Dr. Larry Erhardt

      More likely Amelia Earhart

      Of right, I forgot... Amelia Earhart was the one who was abducted by aliens, while Larry Erhardt's disappearance was never satisfactorily explained...
      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    8. Re:The obvious by afields · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Considering that Ms. Earhart disappeared over the Bermuda Triangle.. I think we should stick with the good 'ol doctor.

    9. Re:The obvious by chopper749 · · Score: 1

      Did you know racecar spelled backwards is... racecar?

  4. In other news by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US Military denied claims that a UFO had been shot down last night over Area 51.

  5. Comb the Desert! by Red_Foreman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Find anything yet?

    Nothing yet, sir.

    Find anything yet?

    Nothing yet, sir.

    How about you?

    We ain't found shit!

    1. Re:Comb the Desert! by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      Thats the first Spaceballs reference in a looong time. Thankyou good sir!

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    2. Re:Comb the Desert! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, do you think we're being too literal?

    3. Re:Comb the Desert! by mseidl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Colonel Sandurz: Sir, do you think we're being too literal?
      Dark Helmet: No you fool, we're following orders. We were told to comb the desert so we're combing it.

    4. Re:Comb the Desert! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Thats the first Spaceballs reference in a looong time.
      Not fucking long enough IMHO.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Comb the Desert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm relatively sure that the "fucking" cancels out the "H".

      Barf!

  6. Has anybody looked here? by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Has anybody tried looking here? Of course, if he was shot down for wandering into restricted airspace, he's (a) dead by now and (b) the government will say nothing about it ever happening.

    1. Re:Has anybody looked here? by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

      Has anybody tried looking here?

      Where? I get a 404: Place doesn't even exist error.

    2. Re:Has anybody looked here? by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if you zoom in enough, you can see the wreckage.

    3. Re:Has anybody looked here? by charleste · · Score: 1

      Oh, how I wish I had moderator points! That made me snort coffee out of my nose. Thank you! :-D

    4. Re:Has anybody looked here? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      You all joke about this but I can quite easily believe that the US government would kill plenty of innocent people just to keep their secrets secret.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    5. Re:Has anybody looked here? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      While I most certainly agree with this, I think that's a little harsh on the US.

      I'm sure ANY country would kill its own people to keep its secrets.

      Hell, forget the government. I'd say the same of many people on the street. (As for me, my only secret is that everything I say is a lie.)

    6. Re:Has anybody looked here? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      (As for me, my only secret is that everything I say is a lie.) I don't believe you.
      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    7. Re:Has anybody looked here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are in the new .kml file:
      3847'3.23"N, 11912'13.28"W
      38.7842305556, -119.203688889

  7. Re:He is such an attention whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then get off your ass and make a fortune and stop being a whiny little bitch. That might help.

  8. The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by rickst29 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although the upcoming cold front is expected to create high winds this afternoon, conditions this morning were quite good. I hope that he was able to ditch in a survivable place, and pray for his safety.

    1. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Of anybody in the world, Fossett should have the best shot at survival.

      I hope this is merely a chapter and not his swan song.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      On the other hand, we can assume that his aircraft had a very respectable two-way radio. Whatever the misfortune was, it must have been fast enough that he was not able to send any kind of message. Well, yes, that assumes that there was no significant obstruction and there was anyone listening - neither of which can be guaranteed in a remote area - but it seems most likely that disaster struck fast.

      Light aircraft parachutes have been around for some time now, and emergency beacons are practically a throw-away item. At this point in the light aircraft/experimental aircraft game, fatal crashes involving the ground (as opposed to buildings, mountains, seagulls, etc) should be relatively rare and rescuers should never be stumped.

      Yes, I most definitely hope Steve Fossett is safe, but whether he is safe or not, I think that given the current state of technology, it would be good if questions were being asked as to why we don't even know. Are the parachutes so overpriced or unavailable that even someone like Mr. Fossett could not afford one? Are the laws on transmitters so onerous that only idiots would fly with a distress beacon of adequate power?

      (Yes, people should be entitled to take whatever risks they like with their own lives, provided they understand what those are, but implicit in the concept of entitlement is that it is practical and lawful to mitigate those risks as much as possible when doing exactly the same thing. Otherwise, it is not the risk that has the entitlement, it's the activity. The risk is mandatory.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by cmowire · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, things are the other way around.

      Sufficient requirements for design and inspection make even single-engined aircraft astonishingly reliable.

      Most accidents are caused by operator error -- either fuel starvation, controlled-flight-into-terrain, or unsafe flying.

      Also, ballistic parachutes are not available for all aircraft. There needs to be an appropriate structural member for them to be attached to and the correct parachute characteristics need to be set. Only with ultralights can you buy one off the rack.

      Likewise, an emergency locater beacon generally needs to survive the accident and be triggered, either automatically or manually. These aren't built like airliner black-boxes.

    4. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 1

      Correction accepted. Now, if only Slashdot had wiki-like features, your reply plus a few of the other very good ones would make a damn good article.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      What was that saying?

      There are bold pilots and there are bold pilots, but no old bold pilots.
      Fossett took some extreme risks - knowing what he was doing - but this routine flight seems too stupid to have ended fatally. All will no doubt be revealed. It had better not be a publicity stunt.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    6. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by poleydee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also hope they find Steve...

      Steve also often wears a Breitling 'Emergency' watch that transmits on an emergency waveband when you pull the crown out. That obviously requires him to be conscious enough to do it.

      It's particularly amazing that something like this can happen to Steve, given his unbelievable amount of experience under extreme avaiation conditions including several emergencies.

      Steve is the most thorough, and conscientious of flyers who leaves nothing to chance, and is actually very risk-averse.

      Richard Branson was just on the news pointing out the irony of an accident when just out flying, as opposed to being on some huge feat of endeavour.

    7. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by GigG · · Score: 1

      The airplane he was flying has one as well.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    8. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      The plane was wearing a watch?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cirrus aircraft also come standard with ballistic parachutes. Many of the manufactures are offering them as options now as well.

    10. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by cmowire · · Score: 1

      So? He's flying a Bellanca Citabria Super Decathalon, which is not available with a ballistic parachute.

    11. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      At night, under VFR?

      I'd suspect controlled flight into terrain.

      Pretty much buz buz buz buz WHAM. Dead. No warning and he'd be little pile at the base of some hill or cliff somewhere. You could walk right by it and not see the plane there.

      He's coyote food.

    12. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by fthomas · · Score: 1

      As a light aircraft homebuilder, I can tell you why some choose not to use a ballistic recovery system (parachute) - weight. They weight about 21 lbs for a chute that can save a 1500 lbs aircraft. This is also the most the light aircraft can weigh for this type of system. 21 lbs is a lot of baggage/human/fuel to have to give up. They cost about $4k. this could also be a factor, but not nearly as important as weight. Needeless to say, I'll have a BRS.

    13. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by gluechucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      fatal crashes involving the ground (as opposed to buildings, mountains, seagulls, etc) should be relatively rare I'll be willing to bet most fatal aircraft crashes involve the ground...
    14. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by jd · · Score: 1

      Been to any airshows lately? :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    15. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I don't at all disagree with you, though a somewhat unrelated experience. I acquired a radar altimeter many years ago from an auction, very cheap, nobody knew what it was. I thought I'd give it (free) to the first aircraft owner that wanted it. It weighed less than 1 kilogram, had a bog standard sized display, just a small dial with altitude markers. In perfect working condition, still had the plastic and foam wrapping from the factory. Nobody wanted it. The most common rejection was simply that it was too heavy, can't afford the weight penalty. Tried crop duster pilots, general aviation, and a bunch of ultralight communities. Same response. That logic is astounding given the thing would be an excellent additional information point in nearly every instance. Safety comes to mind foremost.

      I ended up taking it to an airshow, left it in a maintenance hanger with a note saying 'Free radar altimeter, requires a good home'

      I guess my point is that 21 pounds might seem like a huge penalty to you, though to others it's an appropriate addition for those 'just in case' moments.

    16. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by wolf369T · · Score: 0

      So they said about Croc Hunter too...

    17. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He took off from a private airstrip, in the middle of nowhere. The radio was likely of little help, and disaster needn't have struck particularly fast. If his engine quit, and he made a forced landing - well, his radio may have only been set to the local airstrip's frequency. Even if he tuned to 121.5 (the emergency frequency) there is no guarantee that he would have had line of sight to an FSS antenna. That's assuming the aircraft even had a radio. Quite a few small planes don't. Quite a few small planes have really crap radios. The story I've heard is he was looking for a suitable spot to do a land speed record. This likely meant he was flying quite low, and therefore didn't have line of sight with any ground based radio. Also, as an experienced aviator, Fossett would know the priorities: AVIATE, NAVIGATE and COMMUNICATE - in that order. Fly the plane first. The plane stays airborne not on Marconi's principles, but on Bernoulli's and Newton's. Communication is the last in the list of priorities. Failing to aviate and navigate is far more likely to kill you than failing to communicate.

      I've flown over large parts of the United States where there is no radar coverage, and no one to talk to on the radio because unless you're at quite a high altitude above the terrain, there just are no ATC or FSS antennas within line of sight. I've had to revert to old fashioned position reporting in some areas of the US while flying IFR (instrument flight rules) because there was no radar coverage on my flight path for dozens of miles. Even in relatively populated parts this happens - for example, around Lufkin, Texas - there's a huge gap in radar coverage if you're below about 7,000 feet.

      ELT (Emergency Locator Transmitters) are notorious for getting activated when no emergency exists (such as a hard landing, or someone banging the side of the aircraft with their hand right by the ELT mounting), and failing to go off at all in case of an actual crash.

    18. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you pray for his safety ? I hope that that is your way to express that you hope he is safe but you can not do anything personal about it, praying for someones safety is not going to have much effect.

    19. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by gluechucker · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no. Always wanted to, though. So after these fatal crashes, which occur in the air unless I'm mistaken, they catch the planes?

    20. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by v1 · · Score: 1

      Aren't most of those emergency beacons set to go off automatically by default design? Read the reports the coast guard files for tracking down boat beacons where the owner of the boat merely took the beacon off its hanger to paint the wall or something, and found it in dock. (if they are tipped they trip, and they bottom end of them is what floats) I assume the aircraft beacons are the same way, triggering when upset?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    21. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Aren't most of those emergency beacons set to go off automatically by default design?

      Short answer: yes. Long answer: Hell, yes!

      Part of the core technology of an ELT is a "G-Switch", consisting literally of a ball and spring switch set to make contact iff the airframe it's mounted on experiences a decelerative impulse greater than certain specifications (which I'll post next week) which are set so as not to trip the thing on every hard handing. Any impact hard enough to get injured in triggers the ELT to automatically transmit. Similar technology, I'm sure, is used in ground vehicle airbags. Both are passively armed at installation. You never have to do anything more (other than, of course, crash) to make them go.

      Another core technology of an ELT is a startlingly rugged (for its appearance - just tough plastic) enclosure with crash survivability demonstrated to be, yes, comparable to flight data recorders.

      I was impressed when one of ours was found a meter deep in the sand on the beach in New Zealand (or maybe it was eastern Oz, that corner of the world) some 16 hours after its aircraft went missing. The aircraft was found down to four meters deep in the sand under the ELT. It had gone down at high tide and was underwater for several hours, so had not been picked up until the tide went out. Somehow we got some photos of the wreckage in a hanger (supposedly where the authorities analyzed it?) and there wasn't a single piece left of it that was the size of your hand. I mean that plane was *shredded*. The analysis estimated that it had gone in at something over Vne (the speed at which parts start getting torn off the airframe by air resistance), yet our ELT had survived not only operational but still watertight.

      A boat's EPIRB is rigged to float free of a sinking vessel, and then transmit. Some, as the parent describes, are mounted upside-down and have a tilt switch which activates when righted (floating). IMU another option is a switch setup which activates whenever it leaves its deck bracket. Like lots of modern, hi-tech ocean ship equipment, EPIRBs can be a maintenance nightmare without specially trained personnel. Obvious but shamefully frequent id10t problems include:

      A: Painting the entire EPIRB into its bracket, effectively gluing it there and defeating its float-free automatic operation mode altogether. Bogus points are awarded for painting the strobe light lens and obscuring it, as well as killing the specified high-visibility orange color called for in the international regulations. These decrease its value even in manual operation modes.

      B: Removing the EPIRB from its deck mounting bracket without realizing that that will set it off unless it is disarmed first. No real damage done here, just an embarrassing visit from the local authorities, and a battery replacement.

      C: Disarming and removing the EPIRB, then painting its entire mounting bracket, including the faces which engage the EPIRB, making it fit too tightly thereafter and defeating its float-free automatic operation mode altogether.

      D: Disarming and removing the EPIRB, masking and painting its bracket, putting it all back together and forgetting to rearm the EPIRB. thus defeating its float-free automatic operation mode altogether.

      ELT failures are, unfortunately, common, usually from lack of battery maintenance. We get plenty of reworks which have had batteries sit and rot in them until they leak and damage everything. This takes many years beyond their required replacement period.

      MikEB
      Pointer, Inc
      (The above post is not the official opinion of Pointer, Inc or its management.)
      pointerinc.com (nor am I responsible for that website!)
      pointeravionics.com
      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    22. Re:The winds were NOT very high this morning.... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Yes, genuine leather strap around the left wingtip.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  9. Check Ireland by Maniakes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's where Douglas "Wrong Way" Corrigan ended up when he tried to fly from New York to California.

    --
    A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    1. Re:Check Ireland by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that made for one of the greatest newspaper headlines ever!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wrong_Way_Corri gan.jpg

    2. Re:Check Ireland by Omni-Cognate · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that gave me one of these, proceeding via the microfortnight to "blading" in professional wrestling.

      --

      "The Milliard Gargantubrain? A mere abacus - mention it not."

  10. party time... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

    well, it's obvious to me that he figured out where Jim Gray was, and liked the view...

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:party time... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, him and 4400 others will reappear.

    2. Re:party time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      shouldn't be that 4399 others.

  11. Paging Francisco D'Anconia by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps he's in a secret valley somewhere, protected by a holographic screen, with other adventurers and industrialists, plotting a takeover of the world?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Paging Francisco D'Anconia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Ayn Rand reference... Should we start buying gold?

    2. Re:Paging Francisco D'Anconia by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      HAH! +1, would read again!

    3. Re:Paging Francisco D'Anconia by runlvl0 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps he's in a secret valley somewhere, protected by a holographic screen, with other adventurers and industrialists, plotting a takeover of the world?
      That's odd, I heard that he'd crashed near a lighthouse in the middle of the ocean...
      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    4. Re:Paging Francisco D'Anconia by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I hear he joined Megaforce.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. Re:He is such an attention whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    way to lay the pimp hand down !!!!!
      +5 Keeping it Real

  13. No idea where to look? by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd start looking on the ground.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    1. Re:No idea where to look? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      The search team better pack some spatulas.

    2. Re:No idea where to look? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Yup, and starting about 100m beyond the end of the runway.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:No idea where to look? by jd · · Score: 1

      But what if he threw the plane at the ground and missed?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:No idea where to look? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      On the ground.. S&$t.. We could use you on the search and rescue team; we were going on the theory that he was either still flying high on a full tank of fuel or hiding in an underground lair.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    5. Re:No idea where to look? by aldheorte · · Score: 1

      That is one of the driest and funniest things I have ever read on /. Bravo and thanks for the laugh.

  14. New record attempt? by Skiron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe he is trying to break the world record for the longest search party?

    1. Re:New record attempt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till waldo finds out, he's very protective of his record.

  15. Bad Weather here in Nevada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been some pretty intense wind/thunder/rain monsoons passing between South East California, South Western Nevada and Utah and North Arizona the past few days. If he hit one of those storm cells, he's a goner. On the other hand, there is a big chance he just parked his plane indoors and is sitting in a poker room on the Strip somewhere, lol.

    "Apophis 2036 - Surf the Big One"

  16. Possibly down in one piece. by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's out in a single engine piston aircraft so if the motor went quiet, the only option would be to land.

    In theory and from what I know of Nevada's geography, finding somewhere reasonable to put the plane down shouldn't be a big issue.

    However, once down, he may be right up the middle of nowhere. You'd assume he'd just get on the radio but if it's an old Bellanca, there may be no battery power available, in a new Bellanca the fault that stopped the engine may also prevent the radio from working. Nevada's geography with raised ranges may block a radio signal in places and it may even be the case that he went out 'non-radio' as some pilots still do.

    I do rather hope he's okay but the moral here is never go x-country without 'booking-out' first even if that means just telling your friend where you're going.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by jsight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There aren't exactly a lot of "new bellancas", but if it were one, I don't really understand how that would make a difference. They still use mags, so there's nothing that would kill the engine that would also kill the radio.

      Unless you count post-crash fire. :(

    2. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You'd think that he'd have an emergency transmitter aboard with its own battery.

      Assuming that he checked the battery recently.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless the Bellanca needs to be hand-propped to start it, it will have a battery and alternator aboard for the electric starter. If you've got that, you might as well have the alternator power radios and instruments.

      I'd be surprised if any Bellanca's old or big enough to have a windmill generator aboard.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      You'd also think he'd file a flight plan...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No new bellancas? O rly noob? check it noob pancake http://www.aviabellancainc.com/

    6. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Why? What could possibly go wrong?

    7. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by punxking · · Score: 1

      I would hope that flying a small plane out of a private airport out in the desert with no prefiled flight plan, that he was at least in possession of some kind of emergency beacon.

      --
      You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
    8. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      For VFR flights, flight plans are optional and very often not filed for (what are expected to be) routine flights.


      I don't know anything about this particular case, but his plane is probably equipped with an ELT which would probably be going off if he crashed. Unless he crashed really hard and broke the ELT too. (Crashing in water is another popular way of stopping them from working ...)

      Hopefully it's all much ado about nothing and he's just landed somewhere (normally) and is enjoying the local scenery, unaware that he's lost ... though I guess that's unlikely at this point.

    9. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For VFR [wikipedia.org] flights, flight plans [wikipedia.org] are optional and very often not filed for (what are expected to be) routine flights.

      I've taken enough flying classes to call BS on that. There is no such thing as a "routine flight". Hell, he could have at least phoned a friend, or one of the guys in the tower and given them a rough idea idea of where he'd be headed.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    10. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I do rather hope he's okay but the moral here is never go x-country without 'booking-out' first even if that means just telling your friend where you're going.

      And even if you tell a friend - carry an EPIRB/PLT/ELT.
    11. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by dougmc · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a "routine flight". Well, OK ... perhaps routine means something different to you, or perhaps your instructor drilled it into your head to expect trouble in every flight. Sounds like a good policy.


      But you do have to be aware that 99+% of all flights end up being uneventful, and were expected to be that way (even if the pilot always plans for the worst.) I'll bet he filed flight plans for his world-record attempts, but like many other pilots, if he's just flying down to the next city to get some lunch, he might not. Sure, everybody should, but not everybody does.

      Hell, he could have at least phoned a friend, or one of the guys in the tower and given them a rough idea idea of where he'd be headed. You're not looking for an argument here, are you? Any time you go out, it's not a bad idea to tell somebody where you're going, be it in a plane, boat, car or on foot. At least that's what my wife tells me. But I draw the line at walking down the street to check the mail!
    12. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as a student pilot, it is drilled into you to always file a flight plan. In practice, however, only students file VFR flight plans. I know it sounds hypocritical, but it's true. I am a 500 hour, commercial pilot with instrument rating and I've never filed a VFR flight plan other than when I was a student. None of the pilots I know at my airport file VFR flight plans either.

      Most likely, Fossett wasn't in the habit of filing VFR flight plans either. Maybe if he survives he'll change his mind. ;-)

    13. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless the Bellanca needs to be hand-propped to start it, it will have a battery and alternator aboard for the electric starter. If you've got that, you might as well have the alternator power radios and instruments.

      I'd be surprised if any Bellanca's old or big enough to have a windmill generator aboard. Even assuming a complete electrical failure, GPP is correct in that the mags would keep the prop turning and I think a windmill generator is an unusual bit of kit for most small birds. Most of the aviators I know (including myself) carry a back-up handheld radio for basic communications if the radios go down. Losing radios is hardly an emergency, however, and a pilot of Fossett's experience would doubtless have seen the alternator fail on his gauges long before his battery was exhausted.

      Here's hoping that he got down in one piece. His ELT should have activated if he had a hard landing (or of course can be manually activated) but the rugged terrain would screw up the signal. Presumably airliner crews are listening to 121.5 in the area to see if they can catch a signal from him. Good luck to 'em.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd assume he'd just get on the radio but if it's an old Bellanca


      Then again, he is probably smeared all over a rock canyon.

    15. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, right. Who's the noob? That's a kit plane prototype. Bellanca hasn't mass produced and/or certified anything in quite a long time. I'm pretty sure that kit plane was discontinued too.

    16. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      I do rather hope he's okay but the moral here is never go x-country without 'booking-out' first even if that means just telling your friend where you're going.

      He did, at least to the extent possible. According to Yahoo's latest article:

      "We understand that Steve Fossett was flying solo and he was carrying four full tanks of gas on board. He was searching for dry and empty lake beds which might be suitable for his plan to break the land speed record."

      He didn't file a flight plan, because he didn't have a specific destination.

    17. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by jsight · · Score: 1

      Apparently you are the noob. I didn't say there were no new ones, I just said there weren't many. The company that you mentioned is trying to build a new airplane that is kind of bellanca like.

      The company which has succeeded in building some is:
      http://www.bellanca-aircraft.com/

      Those guys own the type certificate, and have built several of the airplanes. As far as I know, they built one Bellanca Viking in 2006 (maybe even 05) which has not yet sold.

      The airplane that this guy was flying actually was a bellanca citabria. I didn't read enough of the article to notice that before. Those are now built by American Champion:
      http://www.amerchampionaircraft.com/

      Noob? Not exactly. :)

    18. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by hax4bux · · Score: 1

      I call BS on your BS.

      I fly ~150 hours/year just going to work. It is my expectation (normally realized) that I will take off, climb, trim the aircraft and drink coffee until preparation to land. I would have quit flying long ago if every trip was a dramatic adventure. So far, only turbulence keeps me from my coffee.

      Most airports do not have control towers (since you don't know this, I'm guessing you aren't really a pilot just yet). I can personally testify that "one of the guys" in the tower absolutely has his own work to do and doesn't really care what your are doing as long as it's not in his airspace).

      I haven't filed a VFR flight plan since I finished my private pilot, and I do not anticipate ever filing another one. EVER.

    19. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by ET_Fleshy · · Score: 1

      Even after I got my private, I still filed VFR flight plans. That is, however, until I discovered flight following; don't think I've followed one since! But yeah, not telling literally anybody where you plan on going, even if it's "to the west to work on manuevers or something" is a pretty retarded idea. Also, don't know about you, but if I were going down I'd switch the damned ELT to "on" if I was in that remote of an area. Though who knows what actually happened.

    20. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O rly noob? oh yea, well guess you don't know they have already manufacutred lik 10 million of them? Not many? lolz u r pretty dumz

    21. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aircraft engines use a magneto based system to generate spark for the engine. It is completely separate from the "main" electrical system. That said aircraft radios are VHF which means line of sight only. It is quite possible that you could set down somewhere and not be able to get anyone. And the real moral of the story is to file a flight plan.

    22. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Note, parent posters link instantly crashes FireFox.

    23. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by jsight · · Score: 1

      I used firefox to look at it before posting. It did crash safari for windows, though.

    24. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by gotporn · · Score: 1

      What is outstanding is the amount of posts here from people who appear to be total cocks. Quite amusing. Anyone who could have worked a PC could easily find out that Fossett was searching for a strip of land to run an attempt on the Land Speed record. It's quite obvious that no one here has the level of income to be a pilot otherwise they would know how hard it is to file a flight plan "going looking for some flat land out there" which is of course what he did. The total lack of human compassion is also evident and whilst our thoughts are with the friends and family I'm sure the rest of you lot are too busy fiddling with yourselves to have any.

    25. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've done around 1200 hours of single engine flying, and I call BS on your BS. He was on a local flight to look for places for a land speed record, apparently. Not a cross country. For an experienced pilot, this is a "routine VFR flight". He likely wasn't planning on going more than about 50 nautical miles from the airfield. Pilots doing flights like that very often just preflight the aircraft, have a look at the chart to get an idea of what they are looking for, and take off. Pilots who are intimiately familiar with the terrain might not even look at the chart. They don't phone a friend any more than they'd phone a friend before driving to the grocery store in their car.

      There was no guys in the tower, the airfield he left from is a non-towered field. It's quite likely he was the only person on the airfield when he departed. Around 90% of airfields in the United States do not have a control tower.

    26. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Sorry, It's not that I doubt what he did or didn't do, I just think he was being stupid. I don't care how many pilots pop up and tell me how many flight plans they don't file, if you want to fly over a patch of desert without doing something as simple and easy as filing a flight plan, you get what you deserve.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    27. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I'm an actual pilot, and it's not BS. A lot of times people just go up to "knock about the pattern" and don't even KNOW where they're going ahead of time. You can really file a flight plan in that situation. Now if I'm going from XYZ airport to ZYX airport, am planning on getting flight following, etc (ie, if I'm doing a cross country) then certainly, but if you think most guys are gonna file a plan every time they spin the engine up then you're just being naive.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    28. Re:Possibly down in one piece. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      OK, how exactly would a flight plan have helped? Do you understand what a VFR flight plan does and doesn't do? What, exactly, would you put on this flight plan for a meandering search for lakebeds?

      People who have lots of hours flying have told you a VFR flight plan is not particularly useful. Yet, as a non-pilot, you think that not filing some paperwork you don't actually understand is stupid? That's supremely arrogant of you, not to mention ignorant. Before you say "common sense", common sense is often wrong. Common sense once said the earth was flat.

      Not carrying a couple of day's water when flying over the desert is "inadvisable", and possibly even stupid. Not filing a flight plan with the FSS is neither here nor there, no matter how much the mass media asserts that it is. Or how much you, a non pilot, asserts that it is. (Think for a moment: how accurate is the mass media with computer or internet related issues? Do you think they are any better with aviation?)

  17. Misleading summary by rossdee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fossett may have been the first to fly SOLO around the world, but Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager flew round the world non stop without refueling in 1986.

    1. Re:Misleading summary by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank you. I also encourage people to think hard about which is really the more interesting and challenging accomplishment.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Misleading summary by Some_Llama · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I also encourage people to think hard about which is really the more interesting and challenging accomplishment."

      Obviously it's spending 9 days, 3 minutes, and 44 seconds listening to a woman nag about headwinds, proper wing tilt and hygiene.

    3. Re:Misleading summary by piquadratCH · · Score: 1

      Fossett may have been the first to fly SOLO around the world, but Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager flew round the world non stop without refueling in 1986.

      Rutan and Yeager flew in a plane (the Voyager). The first ones to do it with a balloon were Bertrand Piccard and Steve Fosset onboard the Breitling Orbiter III.

    4. Re:Misleading summary by piquadratCH · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was Piccard an Brian Jones, of course.

    5. Re:Misleading summary by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've thought about it hard.

      The greater engineering challenge is the first one. Once you know how it can be done, and apply the lessons learned from the first flight, adding one more element of difficulty is much easier. I think an average pilot with a plane built by Scaled Composites and supervised by the last person to do this same flight would have had the same chance to make the second flight solo.

      Is that the right answer? Do tell.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    6. Re:Misleading summary by Surt · · Score: 1

      My opinion is that in addition to your argument, the difficulty of this task is reduced by carrying fewer passengers. The passenger weight is not at all insignificant, so doing this with one person rather than two is actually a significantly simpler proposition. Having a single pilot retain sufficient alertness over the flight period is a long solved problem.

      So there are actually a number of reasons to believe that doing this solo was not nearly as great an accomplishment as doing it with two people.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Misleading summary by ciotog · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't seen Fossett - he was easily the size of three men put together.

    8. Re:Misleading summary by drew · · Score: 1

      He also was not the first to fly a balloon around the world. Again, he was the first person to do it solo, but the Breitling Orbiter made the trip before he did. Whoever posted the summary seems to have been either badly misinformed, or completely careless.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  18. Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which gives him a good shot at safely landing the plane in an emergency. Unfortunately, if he lands in the middle of the desert, he might have a very hard time getting back to civilization before his water runs out. Also: it doesn't matter how good a pilot he is, if there was serious mechanical failure on that plane during flight he would have had to bring it down. There is no option.

    His biggest mistake: not filing that flight plan. Huge *huge* fuckup.

    1. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Nimey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His biggest mistake: not filing that flight plan. Huge *huge* fuckup.


      Quoted for truth. Private pilots, for the love of your friends and relatives, PLEASE file a flight plan whenever and wherever you fly. It's fucking hard to find a crash site if you don't know where to look and have to guess based on the aircraft's range. It's also a major waste of rescue time and resources, and you have an excellent chance of dying from exposure or injuries before you're found.

      IOW, just crash the damn airplane into a cornfield somewhere if you want to commit suicide. Leave a note first.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 1

      IOW, just crash the damn airplane into a cornfield somewhere if you want to commit suicide. Leave a note first. nonononono... shotgun mouthwash. Why destroy a perfectly good airplane? :)
    3. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      He flew out of a strip near Reno. Reno is fairly far from Arizona. It's more likely that he's in Nevada, California, or perhaps even Utah.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      So is Oklahoma. Unfortunately, he's lost in Nevada.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Seriously...."Arizona is flat"....possibly the most ignorant thing I have heard this week.

    6. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by jimwelch · · Score: 1

      >>So is Oklahoma.

      Only the western half of Oklahoma is flat. the NE is hilly, the SE mountains.

      When I travel from Bartlesville (NE) to Stillwater/OSU (central), the up/down,up/down in-between is a killer, and the dirt magically turns from brown to red (clay).

      And NO, we do not wear six-shooters to work. (We carry, 9mm Glock, just kidding ATF!)

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    7. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yes. I made a mistake. Welcome to being human. Try it sometime.

    8. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      What would the flight plan have said in this case? "Flying around to see some lakebeds, back in the morning?" Based on what his friends have said, it's not like he had a specific destination in mind.

    9. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by hax4bux · · Score: 1

      Oh, just byte me.

      I flew to work this morning (Redding, CA to Concord) without a flight plan. I haven't filed a VFR flight plan since I finished my private pilot. If I should ever make an unscheduled stop, I will whip out my cell phone (or handheld xcvr) and ask for a tow truck.

      All this drama is amazing.

      Fossett is flying a Super Decathalon, which is still in production. They are nice aircraft, reviewed in the current edition of "Aviation Consumer" - and I wouldn't mind having one myself (but I cannot justify owning a Decathalon and a RV-8).

      A Decathalon is not your mothers Cessna. If you cannot land a Decathalon within a few hundred feet, then you don't deserve to fly a Decathalon. If I ever needed to get on the ground in a hurry (deadstick or whatever) a Decathalon would be my choice.

    10. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by phliar · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Whatever the biggest mistake was that led to his now being missing, failure to file a flight plan was not it.

      A VFR flight plan is is basically useless. If I'm going to flying over hostile territory (hostile here means if I have an engine failure there will not be a safe place to land and get fuel, maintenance, etc.) I'd rather tell my loved ones and friends rather than the FAA. I leave my route of flight with said loved one with instructions that if he doesn't hear from me by time X, call the FAA and give them my route.

      BTW, Arizona is not flat -- surely you're heard of the Grand Canyon? In any case, getting on the ground safely is not the end of the adventure if you're 10 miles from civilization. In large chunks of the western states civilization is a lot farther than 10 miles.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    11. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so naive.

      1. You can't file a flight plan if you don't know where you're going or when you'll be back. From the report I read, he told his friend he was going to look for some flat salt beds for some future project. What's he supposed to say? "Uh, I'm heading to the south and I'll be back before my fuel runs out?" Right. That'll work.

      2. Flight plans cause more panic than they prevent. VFR flight plans have to be closed manually by the pilot with FSS (Flight Service Station). This is usually a phone call once you're on the ground because air traffic control will NOT close a VFR flight plan for you and you can usually only get FSS on radio in heavily populated areas at altitude. A lot of pilots forget to close their flight plan, especially if they're not in the habit of filing one. You get on the ground, start securing the airplane, get chatting with someone at the airport. Next thing you know, you're thirty minutes overdue and the panic starts. The FAA starts by calling your destination airport (assuming they can) and then they call out the Civil Air Patrol. I personally know of a pilot who closed his flight plan, but FSS dropped the ball and didn't record the closing. His wife got a call in the middle of the night saying that he was missing and they were going to start looking for him at first light. You can just imagine what kind of sleepless night it made for his wife. Fortunately, he checked in with his wife once he got settled in and she told him of the FSS blunder.

      No one I know files a VFR flight plan.

    12. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by samkass · · Score: 1

      Yes, but.... he's not there, either.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    13. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by flyonthewall · · Score: 1

      PLEASE file a flight plan whenever and wherever you fly. It's fucking hard to find a crash site if you don't know where to look and have to guess based on the aircraft's range.
      Actually, the same can be said even if you do file that flight plan. At least the haystack is a little smaller.
      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    14. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by egreshko · · Score: 1

      Of course he departed from the Flying M Ranch in Nevada. But for those interested in the terrain you can check out http://maps.google.com/maps?q=http://bbs.keyhole.c om/ubb/download.php?Number=167976&t=k&om=1 or download
      http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/download.php?Number=167 976 to your Google Earth.

    15. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by flyonthewall · · Score: 1

      I work in the SAR world. It is folks like you that we usually end up spending countless resources on. You may think that you will not need rescue and I would love nothing more than to let you rot where you lay; however your kind never seem to think of the angst you put your loved ones through.

      {shakes head}...

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    16. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you made two mistakes: saying he crashed in Arizona, and then saying that Arizona is flat (not even very close!). If there was only the one mistake, I'd think you were human; two, no way.

    17. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 1

      He was departing from a private airstrip. Typically what's done in that case is to call the nearest commercial tower (airport) and put in a flight plan there. Or one could call the FAA I suppose. Usually flight plans have a destination, but if the pilot is just going up to collect flight hours or go sightseeing it's perfectly reasonable to say 'no destination' and give a heading. It's also a good idea to keep in contact with nearby controllers so they know you're in the area (especially if the small plane doesn't have a transponder).

      He should have filed a flight plan. Every commercial airport in the country, small or large, wouldn't have let him take off without one.

    18. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck do you fly out from? I've never heard of even a small airport that will let someone take off without having first filed a flight plan. Even if you're just going up VFR for afternoon sightseeing.

    19. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I fucked that up. My mistake.

    20. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Kyaphas · · Score: 1

      "I've never heard of even a small airport that will let someone take off without having first filed a flight plan. Even if you're just going up VFR for afternoon sightseeing."

      That's because you're not a pilot and don't know the rules. Other than in TFRs, flight plans simply ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR VFR FLIGHT. While it's highly recommended for SAR purposes. It's just not required for VFR flight. Sorry, you're wrong. It's done all the time.

      Hell, here in the DC area, you need a flight plan to exit the ADIZ, then from there on you go wherever you want. Plan on file or not.

      --
      ---- The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -Thomas Jefferson
    21. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by slacktide · · Score: 1
      Christ, what is it, preteen know-it-all day on Slashdot?

      1. No, you don't (generally) call "the tower" to file a flight plan. By the way, you are aware that airports with control towers are a minuscule minority, right?

      2. No, you don't call "the FAA" to file a flight plan.

      3. No, you don't need to file a flight plan to take of at 99.99 % of the commercial airports in the country.

      The only time you are required to file a flight plan for VFR flight is if you are planning to cross the ADIZ - air defense identification zone. This may be the case if you are planning to cross the US border, planning a flight over international water, or are flying in/out of a few select airports surrounding Washington DC.

      You can file a flight plan in a few ways. You can file online using DUATS, which of course requires an internet connection. You can call 1-800-WX-BRIEF which will connect you to the helpful, friendly people at the Lockheed Martin company. Since all flight service facilities have been outsourced to LMCO, whom is obviously interested in maximizing shareholder value, filing a VFR flight plan now requires around a one hour time on hold. So of course, no one files unless they have to.

    22. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by slacktide · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whether or not Arizona is flat is debatable - you've obviously never been there, and my Phoenix sectional aeronautic chart, plus several trips over I-40 disagree with that postulate. However, Fosset seems to be missing over Nevada, which I assure you is quite mountainous, especially in the area 70 miles SE of Reno where he is supposed to have departed from. You may be interested in wiki-ing up some more information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountain_rang es_of_Nevada

    23. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by slacktide · · Score: 1

      Sweetie, that ain't all you fucked up.

    24. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

      I hate this whole "didn't file a flight plan" business that non-pilots and news media always get so stuck on. I have a thousand hours of flying time. I have only ever filed a VFR flight plan one time during training (I file IFR flight plans whenever I will be in the clouds of course) to make sure I knew how to do it. All other times I get "VFR flight following" which is where I have a squawk code, am being tracked on radar, and am in contact with a controller on the radio. It is better than flight following. If I have a problem I can just press the transmit button and start telling someone about it. And if I go down I will be very near my last point of radar contact. These days nearly all of the US has radar coverage. I can't recall when I have ever been without radar for more than a few minutes. Having a flight plan is not the big deal it is made out to be and not filing one is not a huge fuckup. The worst thing about filing a VFR flight plan? The fear that you might forget to close it and have a rescue effort launched while you are in the bar enjoying a post flight evening.

    25. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

      Every airport (commercial or not although I'm not sure what "commercial" means in this context) will let him take off without one. I have taken off from many airports in the US and not filed a flight plan.

    26. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Alioth · · Score: 1

      No it's not a "huge huge fuckup". Flight plans are useful for IFR flights from point A to point B. A sightseeing flight (which is essentially what he was doing - searching the area for suitable places for a record attempt) has no particular heading, direction or altitude. The best you can do is tell a friend "I'm going flying, I'll be about an hour" - which it seems he must have done as there was someone to report him overdue. Filing a flight plan in this instance wouldn't have made a scrap of difference because it wouldn't have told anyone anything they didn't know already.

      I've got around 1200 hours of single engine time - about 1100 of those without filing a flight plan - because there was no point (the flights were VFR, and virtually all of the cross country VFR flights I take have good radar coverage, and I'm already talking to ATC if I have a problem which is MUCH more useful than a flight plan).

    27. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You either don't live in the United States, or are not a pilot.

      There are only a very small handful of airports in the United States where you have to file a flight plan before departing, these are mainly within the Washington DC ADIZ.

      Most of the several thousand airfields in the US - you can just get in your plane, fire up the engine, and take off. You don't even need a radio, and if you have one, you aren't forced to use it (although it's generally considered good practise to use the radio if you have it).

    28. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Alioth · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong.

      Typically, you preflight, start the engine, and go flying. That's it. Fossett additionally probably didn't have a heading to give - he probably had no more expectation of the direction of flight other than a cardinal direction on the compass to start out on since he was going to search for suitable lake beds. This suggests a meandering flight path on no particular heading.

      You do not need to file flight plans. No "commercial airport" in the United States requires a flight plan (except the DC ADIZ, but it's still not an airport requirement). I've flown light aircraft out of more "commercial airports" than you've had hot dinners without filing a flight plan, including big ones such as Houston Hobby, Houston Intercontinental, Denver International, Salt Lake City International - and small ones, Monterrey, CA., Raleigh-Durham International, Oakland, Austin, San Antonio etc.

      The only time I file flight plans is for IFR (instrument flight rules) flights. I have never, ever filed a flight plan for a local bimble, which is what Fossett was doing. When they find his aircraft, I bet it's within 50nm of the airfield.

    29. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Arizona is flat? I'm not an American but I thought the Grand Canyon was in Arizona?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    30. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I cannot justify owning a Decathalon and a RV-8
      And I've got a 24 inch dick, but I only use half of it as a rule.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      It was posted above that his 'flight plan' was 'look for dry lake beds that he could set a land-speed record at'. If his destination was the same as where he took off... IF that's even the case... it's really not all that useful when he's just flying around looking for flat areas.

      Their first place to look would be close to any dry river beds. If he was planning to look for them, it's possible he may have crashed near one.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    32. Re:Fortunately, Arizona is flat by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that?
      Maybe you all are looking in the wrong places!

      I could have swore that was him and Elvis in line in front of me in the Shit-N-Git.......

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  19. sounds like this was just a short flight by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Be terribly ironic to see him die on a milkrun after surviving all the records he's set doing some very dangerous flying. It's as bad as Steve Irwin getting killed by a critter known for docility.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Alanis, that wouldn't be "ironic." It'd be unfortunate.

    2. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, Alanis, that wouldn't be "ironic." It'd be unfortunate. You don't think it's ironic for an aviation pioneer and adventurer to die on a sedate, routine flight?

      Irony
      5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
      6. the incongruity of this.

      Usage Note: The words ironic, irony, and ironically are sometimes used of events and circumstances that might better be described as simply "coincidental" or "improbable," in that they suggest no particular lessons about human vanity or folly. Thus 78 percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of ironically in the sentence In 1969 Susie moved from Ithaca to California where she met her husband-to-be, who, ironically, also came from upstate New York. Some Panelists noted that this particular usage might be acceptable if Susie had in fact moved to California in order to find a husband, in which case the story could be taken as exemplifying the folly of supposing that we can know what fate has in store for us. By contrast, 73 percent accepted the sentence Ironically, even as the government was fulminating against American policy, American jeans and videocassettes were the hottest items in the stalls of the market, where the incongruity can be seen as an example of human inconsistency. Served.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by afidel · · Score: 1

      There's few things in the world more dangerous than a GA aircraft, it has most of the complexity of a commercial plane with little of the maintenance. Even the experimental craft he flew were maintained and checked out MUCH more thoroughly then most GA aircraft.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by cmowire · · Score: 1

      It's actually fairly common for famous fliers to die in a milkrun, because they figure that it is a milkrun compared to one of their more famous flights.

      I mean, Scott Crossfield anybody?

    5. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a loaded statement. There are plenty of things in the world more dangerous than a GA aircraft. For example: a motorcycle, a chainsaw, a lawnmower. GA aircraft have a slightly poorer record than cars in terms of fatalities per hour, and a much better record in terms of accidents per hour. The vast majority of GA accidents have little to do with the mechanical condition of the plane, and much more to do with stupid things done by the user (imagine that).

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC is half right -- it isn't "terribly ironic." It's a vague, incredibly weak irony and even admitting that much is stretching a technicality in the definition. Had the flight included research for making commuter planes safer, or testing the effects of flight on longevity, his being killed would be kinda funny ironic. I've crossed many streets -- I wouldn't claim irony if I'm run over next time, no matter how "incongruent" it feels, unless I had been crossing to a hospital.

      Steve Irwin's death is not the least bit ironic. A man spent his career pissing off animals. Eventually, one killed him. I don't think anyone expected it to end well (and it's only a "docile creature" when it isn't stinging him in the heart. Which it did.)

      And please don't say "served." It makes all us English speakers sound like twats from bad 90's movies.

    7. Re:sounds like this was just a short flight by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of things in the world more dangerous than a GA aircraft. For example: a motorcycle, a chainsaw, a lawnmower.
      Maybe if you jumped off a cliff with one instead of a parachute...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  20. He's not Missing by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

    For at least 72 hours after the last known contact.

    In Nevada, his goods aren't up for taking until 90 days!

    --
    ...and it should be known by now
  21. Ready the alien anal probe ! by UberHoser · · Score: 1

    Well it has to be warmed up properly. Otherwise there is a risk of chaifing!

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
  22. He's got time... by maciarc · · Score: 1

    As of 12:39 pm Nevada time, he still has 38:47:10 before he's overdue.

  23. Actually he was the first Solo around the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Voyager http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_Voyager/ Was the first plane to fly around the world without refueling. He flew Global Flyer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Flyer/ around the world later.

  24. Doesnt look good... by tgatliff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the other article says he took off flying a Citaborea, which means he was going up to do aerobatics because this is a quite slow airplane for anything else.... (NOTE: Citaborea means aerobatic spelled backwards). I do not remember him being an experienced aerobatic pilot, which is a considerably different skill than just being a pilot. Meaning, I feel I am a great pilot, but a not so good aerobatic pilot other than weather related recovery type turns. I would guess he probably got in a little over his head while doing aerobatics, and went down.

    I hope this is not the case, but this type of thing is fairly common in the aerobatic world. Hence, the reason why they require the use of parachute(s)...

    1. Re:Doesnt look good... by Nimey · · Score: 4, Informative

      ITYM "Citabria" (airbatic backwards). You can use them for just buzzing around; they're about the same speed as a Piper Cub and people do make (short) trips in those.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Doesnt look good... by jd · · Score: 1

      An acrobatic plane, at night/early morning (when visibility is not good), without proper acrobatic experience - that's not a good combination. I really do hope that he had some other reason for that type of aircraft. If it can travel very slowly, then it might be good for aerial photography, which would be relatively risk-free and might indeed require an unpredictable - and therefore unfileable - flight plan. At this point, though, we can only really guess. If he's not found alive - or not found at all - we'll never know what his reasons were.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Doesnt look good... by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      Thanks for correcting the error... I was way off... :-)

      Also, I agree with you that he might have been just going up for a slow flight, as this aircraft would be very good at doing this. I have a couple hours in a Piper Cub, and I also very much enjoyed it just buzzing around... Seeing how slow the stall on this airplane, though, I could not see any reason for loosing it other than a structural failure. Meaning he could have even pancaked this little bird in trees if he had engine trouble...

    4. Re:Doesnt look good... by Noexit · · Score: 1

      I just got in from lunch and had been watching this story on CNN. They reported and had a talking head stating that Fossett doesn't like doing aerobatics and most likely was not taking off in order to do them, despite being in a plane known for it's aerobatic capabilities.

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    5. Re:Doesnt look good... by RockyMountain · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry to nitpick, but it's not a Citaborea, it's a Citabria. It's "airbatic" spelt backwards, not "aerobatic".

      And I _very_ much doubt your claim that Steve Fossett is inexperienced in Aerobatics. On the contrary, 5 minutes browsing his biography will convince you that this man's aeronautical experience is immensely broad. It's inconceivable that someone with his tremendous breadth of flying experience and appetite for adventure never bothered to train in aerobatics.

      Just consider the number of experimental/prototype/one-of-a-kind planes he has test flown and then set records in. You don't test-fly these things without a substantial background in aerobatics.

      And I doubt that his intent for the Citabria flight involved aerobatics. Despite the name, those planes are barely capable of aerobatics at all. A Citabria is about the last choice someone of Steve's wealth and experience is likely to choose for aerobatics. Much more likely, he chose to fly a Citarbria because of the things it's _good_ for: Slow, low, relaxed, sightseeing flight, short-field takeoff and landing, etc.

      (PS I'm speaking as an aerobatic pilot myself, and also a former Citabria owner).

    6. Re:Doesnt look good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is spelled Citabria. The Citabria has limited airbatic performance. The Citabria has a flat bottomed wing and does not have an inverted fuel or oil system. The step up from the Citabria is the Decatalon. This aircraft has a full inverted fuel and oil system and my also have a constant speed prop.

      In any event, it's rather hard to get into a difficult situation with a Citabria. If for example you are in a spin, you have to work just to stay in a spin. If you let go of the controls the aircraft will recover on its own. I might add that with a stall speed of 51, you can land just about anywhere.

      Regardless of what Steve was flying, his aircraft is mandated to have an Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT). Aircraft without ELT and known good batteries (read that fresh and not exprired) can not pass either an annual inspection or a 100 hour inspection. Any impact over 5g's will activate the ELT. A typical GPS will run for a nominal 24 hours. If the ELT has not activated, it's either because of a safe landing or an impact that exceeds the rating of the ELT itself ~200G's.

    7. Re:Doesnt look good... by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      The Citabria I think has a handheld unit... The handheld units are not know for their reliability. Meaning, if he did crash hard, then the ELT probably didnt fair so well... If it did actually survive and go off, then they would already know where he was because the signal is received by the cospas-sarat satellite and not by recovery aircraft...

    8. Re:Doesnt look good... by greensoap · · Score: 1

      Although a CNN article states differently, Federal Aviation Regulations only require parachutes for aerobatic flight if more than one person is in the plane. FAR Sec. 91-307 "(c) Unless each occupant of the aircraft is wearing an approved parachute, no pilot of a civil aircraft carrying any person (other than a crewmember) may execute any intentional maneuver that exceeds--"

    9. Re:Doesnt look good... by GigG · · Score: 1

      All this crap about it being slow. The plane he was in crusises about 125 mph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citabria

      That's around twice as fast as going in a car and 10,000 times more fun.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    10. Re:Doesnt look good... by phliar · · Score: 1

      He was not flying a Citabria, but a Super Decathlon. The Decathlon is like a souped-up Citabria that can do "outside" manouevres -- things like inverted flight and outside loops. The Citabria doesn't like to fly upside down, but the Decathlon is perfectly at home either way up. (Ordinary engines don't run upside-down, you need some special features.) The Decathlon also has a symmetric wing, for that same outside stuff.

      (Yes, I have a lot of time flying Citabrias and Decathlons. Acro, even. The Citabria is my favourite airplane to fly, just loads of low-pressure slow fun.)

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    11. Re:Doesnt look good... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Sorry to nitpick, but it's not a Citarbria, it's a Citabria. It's "airbatic" spelt backwards, not "airbratic".

    12. Re:Doesnt look good... by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

      Touche!

    13. Re:Doesnt look good... by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      The slowness is not what gets you, but rather fuel. If you stand a standard Cessna 152 with long range tanks and plot an IFR flight plan with reserve, you would be stunned with how little of a distance you can travel with plan at only 125mph. That leaves it only as an VFL platform, which is OK, but not ideal in my opnion... That is just my opinion, though... :-)

      Nice Zodiac, by the way.. I have several friends with similar RV's, and I am quite envious... :-)

    14. Re:Doesnt look good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a Piper Super Cub, roughly comparable to the Citabria Super Decathlon that Steve was flying. I've flown it from the US west coast to the EAA fly-in at Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Not just good for short local flights, eh?

    15. Re:Doesnt look good... by GigG · · Score: 1

      Thanks. You ought to build one. That Zodiac I'm building has 24 Gals of fuel and burns ~5GPH while crusing at 130 mph. The translates to a VFR range of ~4 hours or about 3.5 hours IFR. That turns a trip I make at least once a year from El Dorado AR to New Orleans that takes 5 hours by car into flight of a little over 2 hours.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    16. Re:Doesnt look good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is south of Yarrington, within Lyons county. Dead. Heart attack in flight.

    17. Re:Doesnt look good... by geekcoach · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      And, as a former Citabria instructor familiar with the capabilities of the airplane, I've been wondering if perhaps he landed someplace remote and then couldn't get out or get a radio signal out.

      It probably would have had to been on purpose - something like wanting to check out a location from the ground - or some other reason for which he didn't feel a need to radio. If he'd noticed a low fuel situation, he would have reported it while still at altitude.

      Well, *I* would have, and I'm guessing from his record that he's an even better pilot than I am/was.

    18. Re:Doesnt look good... by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

      Well, since this discussion started, we've learned that it wasn't actually a Citabria, but rather a Super Decathalon. (Not that that makes a huge difference, although personally if I was planning on landing out in the rough, I'd prefer a Citab over a Decath).

      Your scenario sounds likely, but there's one detail I keep coming back to. Why no ELT? We know the plane was ELT equipped, and ELTs can be manually triggered. If it was a safe landing, he might have delayed triggering it for quite a while, while he explored other possibilities of escape. But surely he'd have eventually done so?

      My understanding is that ELTs can be observed by sattelite, so no matter how deep steep the mountain or deep the gorge, a triggered ELT would have been detected by now. Is that not so?

    19. Re:Doesnt look good... by geekcoach · · Score: 1

      If it was a safe landing, he might have delayed triggering it for quite a while, while he explored other possibilities of escape. But surely he'd have eventually done so? True, I'd have expected he'd have triggered the ELT manually by now too if he could and that does not seem to bode well.

      The optimist that I am, however, recognizes that there are still some viable scenarios by which that is NOT an option (snapped ELT antenna? left the plane not seeing a need and then couldn't get back?) and he could still be alive, were he to be sufficiently resourceful.

      Since my understanding is that he's the sort who IS that resourceful, I figure it's worth some time to keep participating in the Mechanical Turk search. Especially since I'm unfamiliar with the exact type of ELT on board and the current capabilities of these devices these days. Used to be 121.5Mhz was all there was and you kinda gotta be in range...
  25. I think I saw him... by darkonc · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think he went to Burning Man

    Last I saw him, some chick in a crotchless monkey suit had gotten him totally pissed and convinced him to rip the antenna off of his aircraft to roast wieners over the coals of The Man.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:I think I saw him... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Nah, he crashed in some yokel town and they put him inside a wicker men.

  26. Parent article is incorrect by Jumper99 · · Score: 0

    Steve Fossett, the first person to fly a plane around the world without refueling

    In 1986 Jeana Yeager and Dick Rutan flew in Voyager around the world without refueling. Fossett was the first to fly around the world without refueling solo

    --
    The opinions expressed here are not mine, but those of these dang voices in my head.
  27. No flight plan? No beacon? by westlake · · Score: 1
    no flight plan

    Please explain to me why a pilot as experienced as Fossett does not file a flight plan - does not carry a beacon.

    1. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Please explain to me why a pilot as experienced as Fossett does not file a flight plan - does not carry a beacon.


      Because experience can often generate a sort of arrogance. "I'm Steve Fossett, I can fly anything anywhere anytime, and thus possess superhuman aeronautic capabilities."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not an aviator, so I consulted Wikipedia and recalled the thing about flight plans.

      They are required in IFR (i.e., bad weather). They are not required in VFR, but are a good idea, in case this sort of thing happens.

      After taking 5 different small-craft flights in the last week (vacation), I noted that a flight plan was filed only once - in heavy traffic around Denali. Weather the rest of the time was good enough, and the flights short enough, to not require a flight plan. Plus there weren't any ATC towers in Homer, Chitina, or McCarthy.

      Also, consider that Fossett may not have known where he was going even after the plane was in the air. He might just have wanted to spend some quality time in the air with his craft, flying wherever he wanted to go.

    3. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by delcielo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As mentioned by others, a flight plan is not required for VFR flight. There are reasons for this (and yes, they are debatable); but it is generally considered that even if they aren't required, they are wise. Statistically, you are found faster if you have one on file. The authorities are pretty good about tracking the overdue planes and initiating search and rescue. As somebody else mentioned, it is a good idea to at least check in with a family member before leaving and again when arriving. I call it, filing with Dad.

      If you're not on a cross-country flight, a flight plan is not much use.

      As for beacons, every airplane has an ELT (emergency locator transmitter) that sends a signal on 121.5Mhz. Satellites listen for that signal and are monitored by (I believe) the Air Force, which initiates search and rescue. The ELT is activated by an impact of 5 g's. Transient g-loads which build and dissipate very rapidly can inadvertently activate them at times. It's a dubious honor to have set one off with a hard landing. On the other hand, it's possible for the ELT to be damaged in an accident, or to lose the antenna for it in an accident, etc.

      Mr. Fosset was a smart man, and obviously had filled fellow pilots/friends in on his intentions. They alerted search and rescue a few short hours after he intended to return. So, to say that his lack of a flight plan was a "huge fuckup" is perhaps a bit harsh. All the search and rescue efforts that would have been activated by the overdue flight plan are in fact, activated.

      I wish him well. That's a hostile environment he is in.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    4. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by blitz487 · · Score: 1

      Please explain to me why a pilot as experienced as Fossett does not file a flight plan - does not carry a beacon. Experienced pilots can easily get into trouble because they're so experienced they tend to overlook or dismiss the routine boring safety stuff. It's overconfidence.
    5. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by dougmc · · Score: 1

      does not carry a beacon.
      I believe the ELT is required by law for most GA airplanes. His plane probably has one.


      Of course, if the crash is bad enough, it might be destroyed rather than automatically go off. Or if he crashes into a lake ...

      Or maybe he just landed at his destination and is enjoying some coffee at a local cafe, and turns on the news to find that he's missing ...

      It's too early to tell.

    6. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by GigG · · Score: 1

      Flight plans are neither required for VFR operations. The VAST majority of VFR flight aren't flown with a flight plan filed. If he didn't have an ELT the aircraft was in violation of the regulations.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    7. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      FYI, NOAA operates SARSAT. GPS Satellites are also part of the international system. The Air Force Rescue Coordination Center co-ordinates the SAR (Search And Rescue) mission, calling on the The Civil Air Patrol and any local or state orginizations that are appropriate.

    8. Re:No flight plan? No beacon? by Knackered · · Score: 1

      ELTs can also be triggered manually, which suggests that if he's lost, he may be incapacitated, or the ELT battery is dead, or the aerial is broken. As a private pilot, I'm staggered by the amount of misinformation in this whole discussion (I shouldn't be, it's Slashdot after all), so thanks for adding some real signal to the noise.

      For non-pilots, and student pilots, note that filing a flight plan for this sort of flight would be the exception, not the rule.

      I've flown quite a bit in Citabrias (7ECA, 7GCAA) and Decathlons (8KCAB), including aerobatics. They are very forgiving planes, they glide well, they have good visibility and very good ground manners (for a taildragger).

      --
      a.
  28. Geography? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nevada is not a giant dry lake bed.

    As someone who has traversed just a tiny bit of the variety of off-highway terrain Nevada/Arizona/Utah/East California has to offer, I find it doubtful he could put it down safely. If he went due north, then it doesn't get any easier to land it.

    Let's imagine for a minute he gets insanely lucky and lands without killing himself. He's exposed to some of the hottest, driest weather in the US. How much drinking water is in single-engine plane? How much water could he carry if he were crazy enough to consider walking out?

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Geography? by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says it was a lake bed, as do many of the museums around in N/W Nevada. Basically all the lakes here now are used to be part of one big lake.

      On a completely side note, I'm about 35 miles from where he took off. No I didn't hear a crash, or see a UFO (wrong side of Nevada for Area 51).

    2. Re:Geography? by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      I used to live, camp and hike there. Water is not as scarce as you think, if you keep a level head and think about where to find it. And if he can still walk. It's also September, so the worst of the heat is past.

      Landing the plane in a pilot-survivable way won't be too hard. Landing so that the plane is still airworthy, now that could be tough. Sagebrush is stronger than you think. Add in the rocks, divots, and general bumpyness, and the plane is probably scrap.

      If he flew into clear-air turbulence that is often in the mountains, then the plane may have been de-winged, and that would be it. Or he got down drafted into a mountain. But those possibilities are pretty unlikely.

      We'll have to wait and see.

    3. Re:Geography? by sweetooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Reno but grew up in a smaller town and spent much of my youth fishing and camping near where he took off from. The terrain varies quite a bit from nice long flats with no water in sight to lush valleys where the walker river and others run. The Flying M Ranch is where they were reporting him having taken off from. You have all of that type of terrain there.

      A lack of water and the generally high temperatures are probably his biggest concerns depending on where he landed. On the same token it's going to be cold tonight and it's going to be getting cooler throughout the week. The varied terrain can mean that while water is nearby it's difficult to get to. There might be a river .5 miles away there might be 3 miles in climbing up and down hills to get to it. Landing out in one of the flats could mean 30 or more miles of walking just to get to an area where there is water. Of course they are searching something like 600 miles of terrain for him according to the last local news report so who knows what exactly they think. Smaller concerns are probably rattle snakes, big cats, coyotes, etc. This is rural Nevada and there is plenty of wild life out there.

      If he did indeed take off from the Flying M and not another ranch with a private air strip then this should be the starting point for his flight:
      http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=38.611438,-119. 001675&spn=0.024178,0.040169&t=h&z=15&om=1

      Pan around the map a bit and you can see how much the terrain changes. Keep in mind that he was out looking for a place to break a land speed record and you might be able to narrow it down a bit, but it's certainly not a small area and the terrain doesn't exactly lend itself to searches.

    4. Re:Geography? by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      To repeat one of the survival mantras: Do not EVER leave your (broken) vehicle! Do NOT try to walk out of deserts and the likes, you're most likely to get yourself killed that way.

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  29. Change Nevada State Motto by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    . . . from "The Silver State" to "Nevada: A Whole Lot of Nothing"

    Personally, I enjoyed Nevada's wide open spaces - best star-gazing I've ever experienced.

    But in this case, "A Whole Lot of Nothing" is going to make the searcher's jobs pretty difficult - lots of room to get lost out there (something else I enjoyed about my time in Nevada) - forever.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Change Nevada State Motto by JamesRose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fly over with a heat sensitive camera?

  30. Oh, spare me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's apply Occam's Razor here and say that most likely, he probably crashed somewhere.

    That's what they WANT you to think

    1. Re:Oh, spare me! by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1
      >> That's what they WANT you to think

      Actually, by applying Occam's Razor, it's most likely that grandparent isn't wearing his tinfoil/aluminum hat, which means thats what they are MAKING him think

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  31. my guess: suicide by coaxial · · Score: 1

    Accomplished pilot takes off from a remote airport without a flightplan and goes missing? Sounds like he killed himself.

    1. Re:my guess: suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely it would be more effective to file a purposely wrong flight plan?

    2. Re:my guess: suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one of two things:
      He's scattered all over in little pieces for the coyotes/vultures to eat.
      Or...
      He's merely pissing off a lot of people for deciding to camp out overnight on a dry lake bed while neglecting to tell anyone about it.

  32. No flight Plan? Doh! by mombodog · · Score: 1

    No so smart after all. This is a big No No for any pilot. I think he is moving yellow cake for the NSA.

    1. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by GigG · · Score: 1

      While it does help in the search after an accident a flight plan does NOTHING to increase the safety of the flight.

      I have to ask. When you drive to work in the morning do you leave a listing of the route you are planning to take?

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    2. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by mombodog · · Score: 1

      Driving to work is a repetitive task and requires you to stay on the pavement most of the time, and yes anyone I love knows my route or where I am going. Flying an airplane on the other had is not a repetitive task unless you work for an Airline. I NEVER said anything about a flight plan increasing the safety of a flight,I bet the people who love him wish he had filed one. I would never get on an airplane you are piloting by the way.

    3. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by GigG · · Score: 1

      There were plenty of people that knew where he was going. The type of flight he was on really wouldn't have translated well to a flight plan. You wouldn't be invited.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    4. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by mombodog · · Score: 1

      "There were plenty of people that knew where he was going" Your nuts, they don't even know where to begin the search, they are guessing. He was scouting for a new dry lake bed to use, and that Desert is full of them in all directions, "knew where he was going"? Too bad that was not you that got lost, I bet nobody would be looking.

    5. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by GigG · · Score: 1

      Here's a copy of the flight plan form. Explain to me how it would be completed that would help in the search.

      http://forms.faa.gov/forms/faa7233-1.pdf

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    6. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by mombodog · · Score: 1

      If your that stupid.........nevermind. So you have to use the FAA flightplan form?? Or you can be intelligent enough to make one for your loved ones. See that is the problem with Pilots, they rarely think outside the box, like you. 99.9% of plane crashes are Pilot Error, wonder why that is?

    7. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by GigG · · Score: 1

      Oh, I understand you don't know what they mean when they say he didn't file a flight plan. The information that goes in the boxes on that form is the ONLY information that the FAA will accept when you file a flight plan. So I ask again how would have filing the information that can be accepted by the FAA for the type of flight he was flying have helped in the search?

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    8. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by mombodog · · Score: 1

      Like I said, "think outside the box" and file a non-FAA flight plan with your loved ones, man you are thick today.

    9. Re:No flight Plan? Doh! by GigG · · Score: 1

      But an FAA flight plan is what the whole sub-thread was about. Now go away.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  33. They are looking in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose he was going for a new high-altitude record, and forgot to pack a small rocket for a de-orbit burn?

  34. Draw me a sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news... several residents of Nevada have reported overhearing a small voice making numerous requests: "Please draw me a sheep"

  35. Other stories are available..... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Other stories are available..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wikipedia link? Good luck getting moderated up on Slashdot!!!

  36. He's gone home. by QMO · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's obvious that he isn't human at all.

    It's just that his vacation time ran out.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  37. That's "Citabria" by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citabria

    First I heard it was "aerobatic" backwards.

    I only read the linked article, it didn't say which Bellanca. Super Viking would have been a decent choice, but I'll check again for the linked articles.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:That's "Citabria" by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      Now here is something I do know... Are you sure you do not know me already?? :-)

      I used to own a Turbo Viking (Super Viking with Rajay Turbos), and I can tell you that it is terrible as an aerobatic airplane.. It is just way too heavy for anything other than gentle 1G rolls...

  38. That guy was awesome. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Screw Lindy...When denied a permit for a transatlantic flight because your hand-built airplane (cost 900 dollars) is deemed unflyable, make the flight anyway, and then claim you got "lost."

    The guy made the flight with a couple of candy bars and a bottle of water, and a fuel leak inside the cockpit which he knew about before he left, but didn't fix because he didn't want to miss his flight window.

    It's that fine line between bravery and stupidity; he lived, so he was brave.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  39. Ok, it's a Super Decathalon... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    This aircraft is "capable" of aerobatics - even inverted flight (it's main edge over the Decathalon), but it's really just an extremely rugged hi-wing tandem.

    A great Bush plane actually, I wouldn't assume he was going up to do aerobatics based upon that.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Ok, it's a Super Decathalon... by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 2, Funny

      A great Bush plane actually, I wouldn't assume he was going up to do aerobatics based upon that.

      In the sense that it gets lost in the desert and has no exit strategy?
      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  40. I'm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm searching Google Earth for him right now. So far no luck but I will keep you all posted....

    1. Re:I'm.... by greichert · · Score: 1

      Actually this is quite a good idea.

      Google or the government should ask to have high-res pictures of the whole area taken by satellites or high-altitude planes (U2, SR-71) and have them integrated in Google Earth. So hundreds of people could start looking for the missing plane ... or the wreckage.

  41. It's called a "dumb mistake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans are prone to extremely dumb mistakes. In fact, I'm making one at this exact moment.

  42. To "Gilligan's Island" Music - Original by kevman42 · · Score: 1

    Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale,
    A tale of a guy who's rich
    Who flew off in a small airplane
    Expecting not a hitch

    The mate was a mighty flying man,
    His exploits were all right.
    Steve Fossett he let out that day
    For a three hour flight, a three hour flight.

    The weather started getting rough,
    His flying ship was tossed,
    He didn't pack his chute that day
    His lunch it would be tossed, his lunch it would be tossed

    The plane set down on the hot flat ground of this uncharted desert isle
    With Fossett
    Is he vulture stew,
    A millionaire for his life,
    All that money
    Will not save him
    Here on Fossett's Isle.

  43. "controlled-flight-into-terrain".. by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also known as "Cumulus Granite"

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  44. Uh Oh by Atmchicago · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like Fossett may have gone down the drain. Water we going to do about it!? If we want to find him we may have to tap all our resources.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Uh Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. Best theory to date.

    2. Re:Uh Oh by v1 · · Score: 1

      but what if all our leads dry up? So far we don't have a drop of evidence he's still alive. (unless any of the search team want to leak us some details?)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  45. No Flight Plan? Big Deal by Jupiter+Jones · · Score: 1

    First of all, flight plans are not required unless you're flying on instruments.

    Second, in a case like this, it really doesn't make much sense to file one, IMHO. From the sound of it, he was simply flying around looking at various dry lake beds. There was no set destination, nor even a set route probably. He was going to return right back to his home airport. This was essentially a local "sightseeing" flight, and I've never filed a flight plan for one of these, personally. Even if he did fill in a shell of flight plan, the only benefit would have maybe been mobilizing search and rescue a few hours earlier than they otherwise were. They still wouldn't have any better of an idea of where to find him if he had no predetermined path or destination.

    Actually, even better than a flight plan for VFR pilots is to get flight following. It's surprising that he didn't at least get this. Maybe radar coverage out there is too spotty.

    Also odd is that we apparently have to record of a distress call and/or an emergency transponder squawk. This indicates to me that, if he did have a problem in the air, it was so sudden and/or catastrophic that he didn't have time to send out a mayday. Or it could mean that he landed purposefully on one of these dry lake beds without any problems, but had a problem taking back off.

      - Jeff

    1. Re:No Flight Plan? Big Deal by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Also odd is that we apparently have to record of a distress call and/or an emergency transponder squawk. This indicates to me that, if he did have a problem in the air, it was so sudden and/or catastrophic that he didn't have time to send out a mayday. Or it could mean that he landed purposefully on one of these dry lake beds without any problems, but had a problem taking back off.

      If that were the case he'd have activated his beacon (a TLA I forget but was mentioned on TV that he had one and knew how to use it) and there wouldn't have been a need for a search as they'd know where he was.

      Sounds more like an 'oops where did that mountain come from?' moment to me (learned lots of new things today.. a desert with mountains! I thought Nevada was all sand before today..).

  46. Global Flyer not in Wikipedia? by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    That's a first....a ghost reference to Wikipedia

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Global Flyer not in Wikipedia? by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      Nope, just a bad link. Take the slash off the end.

  47. If you are going to get lost in the middle of ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    If you are going to get lost in the middle of nowhere, you need one of these.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  48. Analysis by stoicio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depending on the type of single engine aircraft he would have
    2 to 5 hours of duration.

    An article suggests that he told a friend that he would return by noon.
    He left at 9 A.M.

    If he only took enough fuel to get to his waypoint and return then
    his total expected duration would be 3 hours.

    This means his expected outbound waypoint should be within 1.5 hours
    of departure.

    If he's flying something like a cessna 170, his top speed is ~140 MPH.

    If we calculate for 160 MPH to take into account either foolhardiness
    or massive tail wind, his maximum distance should be in a circular radius
    of 240 miles.

    From that information he could be almost anywhere in Nevada.
    He could be in California. Or he may have made it as far as
    Arizona, Utah, Idaho, or Washington.

    It would be easiest to find him by reading his day-timer,
    checking his old phone messages, looking in his car, and phoning
    everyone he knows (friends/family/recent business) and mapping
    their positions. Perhaps his most frequent destinations from previous
    flight plans would also help.

    This should reduce the search area substantially and possibly give
    some insights into what he may have been doing/thinking when he left.

    There doesn't appear to be any mention of technical details
    regarding aircraft type, fuel purchase, or his heading after takeoff.

  49. Burning Man by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

    He probably stopped in at burning man , took some happy pills and is just chillin' on the playa.

  50. Probably landed. by gilgsn · · Score: 1

    He was flying a Citabria, which can land pretty much anywhere, with or without it's engine running.. Most likely, he experienced some engine trouble and had to land in the desert. Hopefully he has water with him. It is surprising though that he wasn't able to send a radio distress call. The next possibility would be some medical emergency. Small planes don't break-up in the sky. The problem must be mechanical or medical. I had two engine failures in small planes, landing dead stick is no big deal. The Citabria touches down at 51mph (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citabria)..

    --
    PGP public key at: http://keskydee.com/gil.asc
    1. Re:Probably landed. by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      I learned to fly in a Citabria. My first 16 ours and solo were in one. I agree. Unless he flew it into something solid (like the Earth) or had a medical problem in flight we would have heard from him. An engine out is not that serious and the airplane can be landed on any patch of clear dirt. The plane is made of a welded steel tube truss and is very strong

      However a radio signal transmitted from the ground after a safe landing would not have much range. 25 miles at most. He may be waiting to see another airplane overhead before he transmits.

  51. Did he even take off? Without a PR Newswire piece? by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    Fossett doesn't do anything without a fair bit of self-promotion. Call out the CSI team!

    First, just who told the FAA that Fossett flew that plane out? I think he was done-in on the ground at the Hilton ranch, and is probably pushing up daisies near the compost heap. They dismantled his plane and hid it in an outbuilding far, far from the ranch.

    Or maybe he died just the way a friend of mine died in a small plane so many years ago in his youth. Pilot didn't pay attention to the altimeter and the ground rose up to meet him as they neared the mountains.

  52. I bet by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 1

    his plane was running Linux...and nobody knew how to fix it...

    1. Re:I bet by courcoul · · Score: 1

      No, Unix doesn't crash. He was running Windows for Airplanes and got a BSOD....

  53. I bet he faked his own death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you seen his wife!? Sheesh. She looks like his grandmother! I'd chew off my arm to get away from that! I bet he has been squirreling away cash in the Cayman Islands for a long time now.

  54. welcome to slashdot by weierstrass · · Score: 1, Funny

    you're looking for the 'Plain old text' menu item. It's right there at the bottom of the editing form. Yes, down a bit, that's it. Right next to the Preview button.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  55. Extra cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he went to Mexico to pick up a perfect replica of his plane made out of purified weed rezin, then there was a small fire onboard on his way back. I could imagine he would have lost his focus and could be a few more days...

    Hope he's okay on a serious note.

  56. No he wasn't by GigG · · Score: 1

    jd writes "Steve Fossett, the first person to fly a plane around the world without refueling,"

    No he wasn't. That was Dick Rutan in Voyager. Fossett did it later in a jet aircraft.

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    1. Re:No he wasn't by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes he was. There were two in Voyager, so each only flew it half-way.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  57. He Should fund his own rescue by jefferyfernandez · · Score: 1

    This guy has spent a lot of tax-payers dollars in getting him rescued. This is not the first time he has gone missing or in danger of his life. He should be funding his own rescue attempts.

    --
    cheers, Jeffery
    1. Re:He Should fund his own rescue by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, I'm planning on crashing my plane in about a week, could you guys get a rescue party together? k thx..."

      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
    2. Re:He Should fund his own rescue by jefferyfernandez · · Score: 1

      what I mean is he should pay up after he has been rescued.... not to pay up front you silly. Do you know anything about his past rescue attempts?

      --
      cheers, Jeffery
    3. Re:He Should fund his own rescue by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

      Well, I certainly think the only classy thing to do would be to pay the S&R costs after (if :( ) they find him but I wouldn't want to make rescue into a fee-for-service kind of thing.

      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  58. An old statistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a long, long time a ago when I was taking drivers training that most car accidents occur withing 1 mile of where you live or were you start. I used to fly over Nevada many years ago while in the Air Force and there is much empty and rough land to search for him there so good luck for whoever is looking for him, God forbid, if he crashed.

  59. he'll be back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    as S. R. Hadden. He'll have a company call Hadden industries.

    I find it convenient to keep my interests... mobile. Anyway, I've had my fill of life on the ground. After spending much of this century pursuing the evils and pleasures the world has to offer -- after outliving three wives and two children... I find I've had quite enough of planet Earth.

    The powers that be have been quite busy lately, falling over each other to position themselves for the game of the century, if not the millennium.

    I've had a long time to make enemies. There are many governments, business interests, even religious leaders who would like to see me disappear. And I will grant them their wish soon enough... But before I do, I wish to make a small contribution -- a final gesture of goodwill toward the people of this little planet who've given -- from whom I've taken so much.

    Short flight? Hmm...

  60. Last known location? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    3830'40.67"N
    11912'59.09"W

    is this the airstrip?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  61. Who's John Galt? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    start looking in deserted mountain valleys in Colorado!

  62. what... AGAIN! by somewhere+in+AU · · Score: 1

    "no idea where to look"..

    What *IS* it with wealthy or tech guys when they don't have basic GPS tracking systems installed in their dangerous toys and hobbies? ..and then we have everyone scurrying around here with ridiculous links to their favourite online mapping services thinking that's of any help.

    What you need is something really simple.. "I am here... I am here.. I am $#%#%#" and updated as frequently as you'd like to afford the comms time.. it's not as if they can't afford it.. and now their life is on the line and too late to think "wish they had some way of knowing where I am.."

    ridiculous oversight.

    All the best to him of course.. and terrible.. but really.

  63. ELTs, hello? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    . You'd assume he'd just get on the radio but if it's an old Bellanca, there may be no battery power available, in a new Bellanca the fault that stopped the engine may also prevent the radio from working.

    Please don't post unless you know what you're talking about.

    ALL civilian aircraft save military, experimental, and balloons have ELTs which are powered off a separate, self-contained battery. The system can be manually triggered if it wasn't triggered by an impact.

    The ELTs are monitored via satellite (they'll stop monitoring the older ones around 2010 or thereabouts), so remoteness is irrelevant for signal detection. The geography and clear air probably make it a lot *easier* to spot, not harder...provided he didn't crash into a steep canyon. A search plane flying at high altitude over any reasonable flight paths should be able to detect the signal easily.

    Given the man's personal worth, I would expect that he very well had an EPIRB device or a modern ELT (the older ones aren't very good.) Hell, I'd be amazed if he didn't have a satphone as well.

  64. Is anyone surprised by this?? by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

    He is/was quite the adrenaline junkie, always trying to break this or that record by unconventional means. While I envy his spirit and colorful life, this should have been expected. Bless his family and hope for his safe return but expect a memorial to him someplace soon.

  65. Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bearing in mind the guy might be dead, I find it a bit distasteful we're laughing about it.
    He may or may not have been stupid or suicidal or whatever, but for the sake of his family, friends etc, can we stop making cheap fucking jokes about it.

  66. Civil Air Patrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one positive thing is that Civil Air Patrol is looking for him. They are well known for their ability to find things like this. Also, CAP members are volunteers which means that taxpayer money spent to find him is at a minimum. Basically the aircraft fuel and maintenance. CAP Cessna 182's don't cost a lot to operate.

    Also, the ELT (emergency locater transmitter) didn't get set off. I'm not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing. If he crashed hard enough, then the ELT would be damaged and not send the signal to the orbiting satellites. On the other hand, if he landed OK in the middle of the desert, maybe he is waiting a little bit to see if he needs to turn it on manually. As soon as he does, CAP will have him found in a couple of hours.

    Hoping for the best...

  67. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by pha95mlb · · Score: 1

    Bearing in mind the guy might be dead, I find it a bit distasteful we're laughing about it.
    He may or may not have been stupid or suicidal or whatever, but for the sake of his family, friends etc, can we stop making cheap fucking jokes about it.

    But isn't this slashdot? What else is there to do?
  68. Has anyone tried this approach? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  69. Burning Man by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

    Maybe he thought Burning Man was this week....

    --
    First post! (just in case I am...)
  70. First person... by rsmoody · · Score: 1

    to fly a plane around the world non-stop without refueling was NOT Steve Fossett, it was Burt Rutan and Jeana Yeager in the Voyager that Dick Rutan designed and built. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_Voyager

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:First person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burt designed, Dick flew

  71. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt that are spending this time browsing slashdot.

  72. Massive Heart Attack... by sgage · · Score: 1

    ... or something like that, maybe. A stroke, whatever. That's all it would take to take it down. I hope not, though - I hope he's OK somewhere.

  73. Google Earth by jagdish · · Score: 1

    Maybe he got bored of flying in the real world and discovered that Google Earth has a flight simulator built into it.

    Steve, its dinner time.

    I'll be right up mom. Just let me land this plane in Chile.

  74. I think a stingray got him... by engwar · · Score: 1

    Steve Erwin anniversary anyone?

    Coincidence or plot by evil stingrays to target our attention-whore pseudo-celebrities?

  75. speaking of which... coincidence? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that this occurred on the anniversary of Irwin's death?

  76. Goes to show you.... by Mr.Scott88 · · Score: 1

    It just goes to show you that money does not equal brains as if you didn't already know. Just look at any politician! The plane either didn't have an ELT (Emergency Locater Transmitter) or it wasn't turned on. And he didn't file a flight plan. It's OK to be a bold pilot, and old, but stupidity comes with a cost especially if something goes wrong.

          I do hope they find him alive.

    1. Re:Goes to show you.... by pilbender · · Score: 1

      Most of the time I just let this stuff go but since no one else stepped up, I guess I should.

      ELT's don't need to be "turned on", they are activated by impact. We don't even know if there was an impact. It could be that it wasn't tested properly at annual, but if he's dead, I'm sure the ELT is too. They're tough but he either had control on the way down or he didn't.

      Filing a flight plan is next to worthless. He's either dead because of catastrophic airframe or control failure (in which case he doesn't care about his flight plan) or he's dead because he made some really *unlikely* mistake like nosing it into a mountain.

      Not filing a flight plan is not bold, stupid or arrogant. It's a matter of practicality. My flight plans amount to pointing to a map and telling my family that I will be somewhere in this area (waving my hand around the map).

      Why do people (especially in the aviation community) always rush to judgement, then criticize without having any facts, and then tout experise as though they've never done anything *that* stupid before. He must be incompetent.... blah blah blah. It get's old. I had 3 forced landings during my first few hundred hours of flying and I guarantee I did nothing dumb. But shit happens. That's flying. You almost always live to tell about it and most importantly learn from it.

      This guy wasn't being stupid. If he was, I take it all back, but we certainly don't know if he was being stupid from the information we have right now.

      --
      Fresh horses and more whiskey for my men.
    2. Re:Goes to show you.... by Mr.Scott88 · · Score: 1

      The ELT's I've seen, and yes you are right don't need to be turned on, but they do have a safety that prevents inadvertent activation. True, we don't know if there was an impact and we don't know if the battery life was expired or not. ELT's are best installed in survivable places, like the tail, and that would require a large impact or one where the tail hit first. We won't know for a while what happened. As for nosing into a mountain, I would hope he know about the air currents that pass over mountains and nosing into a mountain is possible. As for rushing to judgments, if you think the aviation community is bad, listen to the media.

  77. He's probably crop dusting Atlanta with Anthrax by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    So much for National Security. No flight plan filed?

  78. Date of Birth: April 22, 1944 by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    People born then do "Just Croak".
    I recon he's jolly lucky passing away while doing something he loved.

  79. He forgot one crucial step by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

    Check for snakes.

  80. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

    Don't joke, my brother-in-law is missing, presumed dead, in South America. I posted to backpacker, military, surfer and ex-pat forums who were a great help and even thought about posting here. But the crap I knew people would post - that his immediate family might read via searches - over rided any benefit that might be gained. Don't feel bad slashdotters but this isn't the place to come in a fixed-point crisis... although I'm sure many good people would offer help and assistance in wider emergencies.

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
  81. YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKING MORON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I HOPE YOU CHOKE ON A TURD MR KNOWITALL IDIOT

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  82. Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    Can we please stop paying attention to this man? He is in the news merely because he's rich and buys toys. This is not news. This is a rich man's self indulgence. With all of the things in this world that need to be fixed, why are we feeding the ego of someone who is not doing anything at all of value in this world. Riding in a balloon around the world? Jetting around? It is not important.

    1. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by courcoul · · Score: 1

      Given that NASA has not come up with much innovation lately (and probably won't in a spell, given the economic doldrums) and the fact that the War on Terror doesn't seem to be generating the level of innovation that the Cold War did, having to develop the technology that allows people like Fossett to accomplish their exploits can be an alternate source of knowledge and expertise in materials, technology and finished products. And that kind of innovation is the only thing that will save us from ourselves and all the crap we've done lately.

    2. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      The team that built SpaceShipOne were innovators. They created new technology and took it through the development process. Those people deserve our praise and support. But Fossett? He is doing nothing. He's going around trying to break Guinness World Records. He flew around the world solo in a balloon after four tries. Tell me--how does that advance science? Granted, NASA is much less inspiring than it once was, but I glean no inspiration from this Fossett guy. He's only about feeding his own ego.

    3. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by courcoul · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite...

      Innovation: the customized jet engines on the plane he flew around the world. In a world of dwindling energy supplies, anything that runs more for less is more than welcome.

      Round the world after the fourth try. Now we know THREE different ways that don't work. Like Edison inventing the incandescent light bulb: tried dunno how many times til he got it right.

      But yes, for us common folks struggling to make ends meet, it is galling to watch this rich snob garner public attention time and again. But if the stuff he has to come up with to get his jollies and which cost him a pretty penny, eventually trickles down to something that makes my life easier/safer/better, I'm quite willing to swallow my pride and tolerate his being a media whore.

    4. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by jamiestickman · · Score: 1

      If your not willing to help find a fellow human being then why are you wasting our time with such comments? i'm not helping to look because he's rich, famous or for any other reason other than he's a human being who needs some help to overcome a life threatening situation. Comments like yours are a waste of time / space / energy etc etc

    5. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Sir, Mr. Fossett repeatedly places himself in danger. He does not use his wealth for any other purpose than to glorify himself by achieving these pointless world records. He has the right to spend his money any way he chooses. He has the right to go after world records. But we as the American public also have the right to ignore this gentleman who is an attention suck, who (as I said) repeatedly places himself in peril. The reason to ignore him is not because he is a fool who again placed himself in harm's way but because he's done this one time too often. Are you so in love with the exploits of the rich that you have no internal guidance that tells you when someone is behaving in an attention-seeking manner?

    6. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by jamiestickman · · Score: 1

      Sir, We know your view point, which you have eloquently re-presented; but, have you tried to understand the one I presented?

    7. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      Jamie, You are speaking to a person who gives a lot to charity, to the homeless and who rescues feral cats regularly. I am absolutely comitted to helping people in need. Mr. Fossett of course deserves to be rescued. And I hope he receives a bill for every single penny his rescue costs. I feel the same way about wealthy mountain climbers who get themselves into trouble and then expect the public to pay for their rescue. I wonder whether or not Mr. Fossett would be so willing to help the poor? Seeing that he's a multimillionaire--and such folks are generally Republicans--I don't doubt that he is against rescuing the poor. (Although I do not have any hard data.) So, my objection is not against rescuing people. Rather, it's against rescuing the rich thrill seekers who expect to be bailed out of messes they themselves got into.

    8. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by jamiestickman · · Score: 1

      imho your view on the subject of payment for rescueing people is one which should be debated, but, why raise it now on these pages - as doing so is not helping achieve the objective. Surely the correct time to raise such issues is after he has been found?

    9. Re:Why The Fascination With A Rich Idiot? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not been following the news cycles on this. Fossett has been doing this for years. And after someone has been rescued, how long do you think it will remain in the news? Not 1 minute. This is the time for raising these issues. Nobody is interfering with the actual rescuers. So, do you enjoy spending your tax dollars rescuing billionaires? While the poor die around us, we certainly need to spend our collective wealth on rescuing billionaires.

  83. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    I guess you are no fan of the Darwin Awards.

  84. Just wait by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

    He'll be back there coming from the other direction in a little while.

    --
    "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  85. Ayn Rand by SporkLand · · Score: 1

    Anyone else feel like some sort of Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged stuff is going on?

    First Jim Gray, now Steve Fossett. I'm wondering when Carmack is going to "try" his rocket and disappear as well.

    1. Re:Ayn Rand by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

      Yup this did cross my mind.

  86. Re:speaking of which... coincidence? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that this occurred on the anniversary of Irwin's death?
    Well, it's bound to have been on the anniversary of someone's death, isn't it?
    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  87. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boo-hoo cry me a river. People die all the fucking time. Jokes are a means to both entertain, and relieve stress. Some people might be laughing out of malice or ignorance; but other might be using it as a way to relive a stressful (sad) thought. Get over your "everyone must be solemn and mourn" attitude, and worry about yourself.

    If his family is reading Slashdot and expecting a codling hand and words of sympathy; they seriously are misguided and need to explore the internet more.

  88. Re:Whether or not he was stupid, can we stop laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck would you even consider coming to slashdot in a "time of crisis". You have to be a complete retard if you think a "geeky" news disscusion site is the right place to go to help solve your problem. Sorry about your brother-in-law, but frankly that's a problem to cry about somewhere else.

    You might try cryaboutthings.com

  89. What if.... by courcoul · · Score: 1

    In 1944, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (the author of The Little Prince) took off on a routine mission and vanished. Rumours and speculations ran rampart, amongst which there was a talk of suicide and not wanting to be ever found. Over 50 years later the wreckage of his plane was found in a location very different from the route he was supposed to take, with no additional damage besides that caused by the crash (World War II was raging at the time, just FYI), adding credence to the suicide theory.

    Hopefully, this will not be the case on this occasion.

  90. Steve Fossett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somone please BAN all these kids from using a computer please, also ban them from taking ficticious cheap humour from movies. If I hear one more insulting comment for the sake of some childish moron's cheap image GRRRRRR!!!!!!!!

  91. Please make the volunteer's life easier by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I'm going to donate some of my time to help finding him. The ability to help someone over the Internet is wonderful. However, the Amazon's mechanical Turk page (this one) refers to non-standard units like feet. I'm told I'll have to set the height on my GoogleEarth client at 1500 feet and that the aeroplane is 22 feet long, but this is like talking nonsense to me, as I can understand only metres (I'm from EU). I had to convert this, but I can't stop thinking that the page author makes the life of non-US volunteers a bit more difficult. Shouldn't important emergency-related webpages contain both the customary/local (feet) and standard (metres) units? Not that in this occasion this is of much importance (I just typed '1500 feet in metres' in Google), but I just wanted to raise this issue. What if you are in a life-or-death emergency situation and your ability to save someone depends on you understanding a non-standard unit that someone thought everyone would know about but in reality it is used only in some parts of the world out of custom? This problem of course also exists in many non-emergency situations... eg last time I got to England whenever I was asking locals where I could find a shop etc I had to deal with yards, and I had to get our my PDA to find out how far I should walk. With the global commerce and increasingly international communications, can't all countries agree to a single set of universal units and fund campaigns to help common people get accustomed to the standard units? Apart from language barriers, different sets of units really make intercultural communication harder than it needs to be.

    1. Re:Please make the volunteer's life easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called metric and imperial we use both in Britain it its not a problem ots really easy to use both can you not use this forum space for moaning about trivialities.

  92. Steve Fosset by covenly1 · · Score: 1

    I believe Mr. Fossett's last sight was of orange/yellow type mountain side. I am not sure he is dead. I know the word 'gorge' is WITH the orange/yellow mountain side. I have volunteered with police and FBI with my ability, more than once.

    1. Re:Steve Fosset by shesinthesierras · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate a little? I've been looking the outskirts of the "shaded" area and saw potenial crash site very close to orange/yellow type mt side... where I truly belive to look.. Mono Lake to North Yosemite Wilderness... I'd vear that way myself

  93. I found this but I dont know where to report it. by NamesAreDangerous · · Score: 1

    http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c147/funeraltime/FOSSIG.jpg

    I found this with updated images from geo and google earth.

  94. Re:I found this but I dont know where to report it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes that plane was there on the black and white (updated)image also, but not on the original satelite images so I've been intrigued with that one myself also.
    I've not seen the follow up to that since it was first reported in the week. Can someone please clarify that image because its right on his most likely flight path.

  95. Re:DUH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Steve Fossett---and let him rot where he fell. Stupid cocksucker he is---too fucking idiotic to file a flight plan---too bad asshole!

    To waste all these resources on some arrogant fucking prick like Fossett is unbelievable! The search has found SIX wrecks---some DECADES old---where the fuck was the interest for those lost souls?

    Fuck Fossett---c'est la Vie!

  96. Re:I found this but I dont know where to report it by sonchat · · Score: 0

    did you see the latest report that maybe they found the crash site 20 mi west of Minden.

  97. Put these precise cordinates into google??? by NC1776 · · Score: 1

    38.32148227001439,-118.6114948253157