Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Charity Buyers Donate Over $10,000 To the EFF

The Slashdot 10 Year Anniversary Charity Auction for the EFF is at an end and the numbers are in. We are still waiting for payment on one of the six items, but the grand total for the auctions is $9186.83. The big surprise was the anonymous reader who bought the Swag Bag AND the Low UID: he decided to donate an extra $1200 beyond his bids! Thanks to Daniel Peacock (who bought Hemos's burnt copy of Watchmen) and Michael Ravnitzk who bought Triton, the case of the first x86 that ran Slashdot in Feb 1998. He then turned around and told us to shelve it, to try to sell it again later. Instead he got a box of shirts. We're still waiting for payment on the email address, but hopefully nobody would be so crappy that they would scam a charity auction. And lastly, we would like to give special thanks to the University of Advancing Technology (here's a Coral Cache link) who paid $3,550.00 for that hyperlink you just read past. They wanted to express their support for Slashdot and for the EFF, and I think both of us appreciate it. Thanks to everyone who bid on items and congratulations to the winners. And the rest of you - don't feel bad that you missed it. You can always make a donation later - the EFF does good work. Tell them Slashdot sent you.

93 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Did low UID purchaser get a ## or ### ? by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hats off to the dude who chipped in an extra $1,200 for the low UID ... and hopefully he got a two-digit (rather than three digit) UID for his extra $$$ ... ;-)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Did low UID purchaser get a ## or ### ? by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Eitherway I am going to discredit comments saying how you waisted your money by buying a Mac from anyone with a 2 or 3 didgit ID. Being they spent thousands of dollars on the ability to lie about being there before the rest of us.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew I should have bid more than $3500 for that goatse link.

    1. Re:Damn by OctoberSky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could have put in the meaning of life in that hyperlink, wouldn't matter, no one here reads the articles anyway.

    2. Re:Damn by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Save your money. Maybe in 2017 they'll auction off an IMG tag.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Damn by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe in 2017 they'll auction off an IMG tag.

      Ha. Funny. I'll tell you what, though, I'd donate some money - hundreds of dollars at least - to a good cause of slashdot's choosing if they would permanently fix the moderation so that moderation isn't anonymous; everyone could see *exactly* who modded what up or down, your average moderator or a slashdot editor/authority. The "low UID" and so forth are essentially useless and require nothing of slashdot either; but they could actually earn a donation from me if they were of a mind to. Not that I think they would, but still, I'll commit to my end of it right here, right now. The worst thing on slashdot is the way the moderation works as a punitive and ideologically driven censorship mechanism. They've been coasting at the user's expense on the current crappy-assed setup for years.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Damn by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Did someone not get enough mod points in their halloween loot bag? Will some please give this guy an insightful? He's clearly dying over here.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    5. Re:Damn by sootman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. Other problems:
      - Someone finds a sarcastic joke unfunny and it gets modded "troll" or "flamebait."
      - 3 people think I'm funny and I get a nice "+5, Funny" but one person thinks I'm not that funny and hits me with a "-1, Overrated." What crap. The guidelines say "focus on promoting, not demoting" but I don't think anyone reads those. Everyone just wants to form Slashdot into what they want to see, not realizing that it's (everyone hold hands now) all our differences that make Slashdot great. I see ideas and points-of-view here that I would never see in my own little world. (Usually by browsing at +3 early on.)

      While they're at it, they need to add some new ratings like "-1, Factually incorrect."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:Damn by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once moderation becomes non-anonymous, you'll end up with mod wars. Person X mods down person Y, person Y takes it personally and mods down all of person X's comments. This results in person X retaliating, a fuckload of emails to slashdot with the subject "MOD ABUSE!!", and every single user on slashdot is forced to sift though the comments themselves so see which are good and got modded down due to pissing contests, and which are bad and got left at 1-2 because all the mod points were used by people throwing their shit at each other.

      This wouldn't fix the system at all, it would make it worse than useless.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    7. Re:Damn by ConcreteJungle · · Score: 1

      You could have put in the meaning of life in that hyperlink, wouldn't matter, no one here reads the articles anyway.

      Why would anyone pay to get a link saying 42? :-)

    8. Re:Damn by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I think GP only wanted to have editor mods identified, and not normal user mods.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    9. Re:Damn by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Citation? Or are you just rambling here?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  3. I'd support the EFF but ... by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Funny

    [ ] I'm selfish and hate others
    [ ] I like big monopolies
    [X] I'm Canadian and not represented by the EFF in any which way shape or form
    [ ] The EFF tried to kill my daddy
    [ ] I'm paid by the EFF so donating to the EFF is like donating to myself
    [ ] Hey look!

    However,

    [ ] I've started an equivalent EFF in Canada
    [ ] I Joined the equivalent EFF in Canada
    [X] I Bought an EFF hat at Defcon
    [X] I Lost said hat at Toorcon the same year
    [X] I Bought another hat off their website
    [ ] I Regret dealing with the EFF

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by backbyter · · Score: 1

      ...except I believe it was a Canadian "anonymous reader who bought the Swag Bag AND the Low UID", so you've gotta select a different option other than "[X] I'm Canadian and not represented by the EFF in any which way shape or form".

    2. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by leoxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Online Rights Canada, sponsored by the EFF

    3. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, your low UID is awesome!

    4. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by dextromulous · · Score: 1

      Adding some of my own experiences... [ ] I'm selfish and hate others
      [ ] I like big monopolies
      [X] I'm Canadian and not represented by the EFF in any which way shape or form
      [ ] The EFF tried to kill my daddy
      [ ] I'm paid by the EFF so donating to the EFF is like donating to myself
      [ ] Hey look!

      However,

      [ ] I've started an equivalent EFF in Canada
      [ ] I Joined the equivalent EFF in Canada
      [ ] I Bought an EFF hat at Defcon
      [ ] I Lost said hat at Toorcon the same year
      [ ] I Bought another hat off their website
      [ ] I Regret dealing with the EFF
      [X] I donated money to the EFF while promoting nude dunk-tanking (at Defcon, twice)
      [X] I donated money to the EFF while getting someone to freestyle rap about binary blobs (at Defcon)

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
    5. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by ntk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hey, speaking as the EFF's International Coordinator, I protest! We sponsor Online Rights Canada,and don't you recall Sam Bulte (ex-MP) ranting about "EFF members" ruining her day?

    6. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by tearmeapart · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and I have it on good authority* that a Canadian also bought the email address, which was paid for today. Since Canadians appear to be the only people winning these auctions, I guess Canadians care more about what happens in the US more than Americans do.

      * I am assuming I do not have multiple personalities that lie to each other.

      (I realize that my statement of "Canadians care more" will be marked as flamebait, but prove me wrong, d*mnit!)

    7. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      [X] I'm Canadian but I still donated to the EFF. You can legally claim it on your Cdn income tax.

    8. Re:I'd support the EFF but ... by btempleton · · Score: 1

      And let me add that while it was mostly due to other factors and thus not a permanent posting, EFF has had a Toronto bureau for the past few years. In addition, I, the chairman of the EFF, am a Canadian Citizen.
      So is Cory Doctorow, who worked hard for us for many years and is still an EFF fellow.

      So we do care, though I won't pretend that most of our focus remains in the USA.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  4. EFF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The EFF is basically the ACLU of the Internet. Plus they manage to lose most of their cases. Should so much money be donated to a far-left/unAmerican organization like that? They get an awful lot of money with little to show for it, could there be a terrorism connection?

  5. did I read that right? by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did UAT just pay to be slashdotted? Did they factor in the cost of the melting server into their bid?

    1. Re:did I read that right? by backbyter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Psst. (There'll be another auction to remove the link from /.)

    2. Re:did I read that right? by Devv · · Score: 1

      1. Choose to donate to EFF at slashdots charity auction.
      2. Choose the auctioned object that suits you the best.
      3. Fail to account for the massive traffic your choice will generate.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

      --
      +1 Agree -1 Disagree
    3. Re:did I read that right? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      some people enjoy pain so much, they have to pay for it.
      "please sir, may I have some more?"

    4. Re:did I read that right? by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just wonder if it was more or less than the usual price for a slashvertisement ;) j/k j/k

    5. Re:did I read that right? by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Hopefully much less, I mean all the UAT got was a link, not a whole story.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  6. Nice of UAT by moore.dustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I attended the school a couple years back they had a great relationship with the EFF. It is nice to see the school investing in the industry while showing that it is finally moving away from the game design program that consumed much of the schools resources while I attended. I have heard good things about UAT as of late and I hope this only continues that great new trend.

    1. Re:Nice of UAT by MrMunkey · · Score: 1

      I attended UAT during their transition from UACT to UAT. It was a great experience, and I wouldn't have gotten my desired career without it, but tuition is pretty spendy. I suppose most private schools are spendy in comparison to public schools though.

    2. Re:Nice of UAT by DenDude · · Score: 1

      psh! I attended when it was still "The Cad Institute". now get off my lawn ya whippersnappers!

      --
      A Haiku: my language choices/assembler pascal lisp c/old school programmer
  7. too little ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    come on. we have many million dollar people hanging out in here. why only $10k ? rats in pockets ?

    1. Re:too little ? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Those funds might not be liquid necessarily (I wouldn't sell any stock in my company for slashdot swag, no offense), and also, they may have better things to do with their time/money?

    2. Re:too little ? by everphilski · · Score: 3, Informative

      Precisely. I have no more than $2000 in the bank at any point in time, my money is in my 401k, roth IRA, kids college funds, overfunded life insurance, home, etc. I do allright but I couldn't cough up more than a few hundred bucks at a time unless it was an emergency ... the secret to being financially secure is not working for money, but making your money work for you.

  8. Congratulations University of Advanced Technology. by etedronai · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... You just paid to have your web site brought to it's knees.

  9. -1: Not funny by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    I have mod points but I'm not wasting them on this. You need a lot more practice trolling.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:-1: Not funny by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that terrorism connection was a bridge too far.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:-1: Not funny by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yep, exactly what I was thinking.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  10. UAT by orkysoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny, the story talks about the University of Advanced Technology, but the website calls it the University of Advancing Technology.

    It's almost right, which is pretty good, by Slashdot editing standards ;-)

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:UAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Link to your page on Slashdot: $3500

      Extra bandwith cost from Slashdotting: $???? (Thousands? millions?)

      Getting your name messed up by CmdrTaco himself: Priceless!

    2. Re:UAT by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Electronic Frontier Foundation should start their own school so they could call it EFF-U.

      This might be useful during congressional testimony.

  11. A view from a cynical bastard. by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I looked at the links and I didn't see any accounting of the money: how much received, how it was spent, how much for administration (a perfectly legitimate cost - BUT [see below]), etc....

    I don't mean to make accusations, but where's the money going. I didn't see anything on the links.

    Are the administrators buying Mercedes Benz's with their "pay"?

    Just asking.

    P.S. I have plenty of karma - don't be shy about modding me down. I'm using my karma for good - I think.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:A view from a cynical bastard. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      If you found a Benz for under $10k let me know.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:A view from a cynical bastard. by toleraen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are the administrators buying a Kia Spectra with their "pay"? There ya go. Remember, it's only $10k.
    3. Re:A view from a cynical bastard. by StinkiePhish · · Score: 5, Informative

      For what it's worth, the EFF achieved 4 out of 5 stars for "financial efficiency and capacity" by Charity Navigator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_Navigator). Even though they are a bunch of lawyers, they are a bunch of lawyers on our side. And frankly, when I donate to them, I don't care if they are buying themselves Benz's. They produce good results.

    4. Re:A view from a cynical bastard. by StinkiePhish · · Score: 3, Informative

      EFF has four of five stars according to Charity Navigator for "financial efficiency and capacity." Here's a direct link: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/search.summary/orgid/7576.htm (My apologies for not including this in my first post.)

  12. Re:LOL by milgr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps they should have paid for some advanced technology to handle the slashdot effect.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
  13. $10,000 by niceone · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many minutes of lawyer time does that buy?

    1. Re:$10,000 by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if you're hiring Lionel Hutz, the question is, how many sandwiches does that buy? I hear he works on three sandwiches a day. Also, he might live in your car.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:$10,000 by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      In my experience about 600.
      (at least at the billing rate that the lawyer who handled my gripe site C&D letter analysis charges).

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:$10,000 by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Alas, not anymore. R.I.P.

  14. you dont by unity100 · · Score: 1

    go poor by donating to something very important in your life either

  15. Rush Limbaugh raises $4,200,200 6 days by Adam8g · · Score: 1

    Looks like rational folks beat out geeks - especially when it comes to a great charity.

  16. Re:Rush Limbaugh raises $4,200,200 6 days by Adam8g · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, contributing $4,200,200 for the benefit of orphans. If more of us sowed like this - we'd all reap the benefits.

  17. Check parent. by iknownuttin · · Score: 1

    I didn't, but if he's right mod him up to heaven.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  18. AC's are good now? by owlstead · · Score: 1

    And what point is there in being an AC with a low /. ID? I'm confused. Ah, I got it, they don't say which ID, so it's an anonymous ID!

    1. Re:AC's are good now? by Hymer · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure there is any lower UID than the one for AC which obviously must be 0...

    2. Re:AC's are good now? by Zashi · · Score: 2, Informative

      ACs have UIDs of 666.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
  19. yep, 3 digit uids have no cachet by toby · · Score: 4, Funny

    3 digits never got me laid. But with a 2 digit... I'd be dating Natalie Portman AND Giselle Bundchen for sure, and I'd know what to do with both digits.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:yep, 3 digit uids have no cachet by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Obviously you weren't really 'here' in the cool sense.

      So Mae Ling Mak won't even look your way.

    2. Re:yep, 3 digit uids have no cachet by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry to break it to you, but the TOS clearly states that if you use the uid for scoring purposes, Cowboy Neal must be involved.

    3. Re:yep, 3 digit uids have no cachet by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      That's because you just bought yours.

  20. The University of Advancing Technology is NOT by TheBrutalTruth · · Score: 1

    "advancing technology" by running .aspx pages, IMHO. Advanced technology should not make my browser (latest stable Firefox) barf.

    --
    Enlightenment is a pipe dream. So where's the pipe?
  21. Only /.ers by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

    ...will pay for a DDoS attack of their own webservers. In any case, good work mates!

  22. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by Nushio · · Score: 2, Funny

    41? I would have payed an extra $1200 just to have UID 42.

    --
    Check out Unsealed: Whispers of Wisdom! http://unsealed.k3rnel.net It's an action-RPG about Open Sourcerers.
  23. Re:Anonymous Coward (87) by CJ145 · · Score: 2, Informative

    AC's UID is 666.

  24. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Backup for this

    Google results shows 1 posting from netelder (655766):

    http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aslashdot.org+netelder

    Following this link now shows things slightly differently with the UID 655766 being taken by "netolder" whilst the archive still shows the old one.

    The new netelder(41) now has no comments.

    I did wonder how the transplant would occur, and tbh now I think I wouldn't want to leave my comments behind and do it this way.

    resigned to a long uid forever :(

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  25. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by SpeedyDX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They might have requested anonymity so people don't ridicule themabout paying for the low UID. Well, actually, it doesn't matter why they requested anonymity. The fact of the matter is that they did. It's a little rude to point out their account when they explicitly wanted to keep it hidden.

    With all the concern about the right to remain anonymous on /., I don't see why you would purposely go out of your way to lift that veil off of someone else.

    But hey, your curiousity is sated. What do you care. Mod me troll, mod me whatever you like. I think it was irresponsible and inconsiderate to do that.

  26. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Looks like he jumped from 655766 to 41, a pretty nice jump if you ask me, especially for a good cause.

    Google Cache of a post of his

    Regular Slashdot link (not sure if this will ever be updated to say 41)

  27. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by archen · · Score: 1

    While true, he also donated the extra cash to the EFF so seriously, who is going to give this guy crap? For that matter even if I had an extra $10k I don't think I'd shell out to the EFF even with low uid, Natalie Portman and the hot grits included. So cheers to user id 41. You've probably helped defend our digital freedoms more than any other two digit id.

  28. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    I wondered a bit about how the transplant would work, too. I would've wanted to work with the slashdot folks a little slower and see if I could persuade them to do things right. Maybe I could write the SQL for them, or something. :) But it sounds like this guy had so few comments he may not have felt it was worth it.

    I for one think it's really cool, and I was one of the first bidders on the auction, and if I'd won I wouldn't have been anonymous about it. I would've bragged not just about the low UID, but about the fact that I got it under such unique circumstances.

    I'm really curious how people found out who it was.

  29. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by ginbot462 · · Score: 1
    Looks like he thought ahead with the netelder name. Yes, it was a devious master plan. But, it does point out how elders just buy their position.

    On another note, lookout dabman (462), I am coming for you.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  30. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so he just changed a vewel.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  31. you lack vision by unity100 · · Score: 1

    internet is changing the world to the extent that in 50 years, the people who will be in charge of their countries by then will have grown up together, playing same games, doing same stuff on the internet at nights. which will totally eliminate interracial, international enmity, differences, and eventually uncooperativeness and ultimately wars. which will be a major step towards the utopia.

    additionally, in local and general sense, the internet is what is making all people to get informed about anything happening anywhere. this is only due to the free nature and accessibility of the internet.

    such foundations like EFF are providing it to stay as it is, rather than turning into a telco fucked cable tv in which all people will be limited to whatever some fat butts choose for them to see. it affects everything, internet and software alike.

    also remember that the freedom in the internet have created this boom and many jobs that never existed before, and we are actually reaping the fruits of that. if the fat bastards succeed in turning internet into a cable tv clone, many of us, and indirectly many more will be losing our jobs.

    it affects everyone. even those who lack vision and dont give a shit. realities dont care whether someone gives them a shit or not. they affect all.

  32. Re:Rush Limbaugh raises $4,200,200 6 days by Etrias · · Score: 1

    Who replies to their own comment?

    Oh I know, some idiot astroturfer who just signed up today. Silly me. Weird kind of astroturfing though.

  33. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by dlgeek · · Score: 1

    If you read my post (grandfather) you'd have seen - ebay shows the winner of an auction and the slashdot and ebay userids were both 'netelder'.

  34. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by daybot · · Score: 1

    I think it was irresponsible and inconsiderate to do that.

    Come on - do you think any self-respecting Slashdotter wouldn't know full well that this would be easy to discover and the winner would be outed within minutes in the comments?

    Besides, there's no shame in buying a low /. UID at a charity auction. It's doing something that's cool, to get something that's, well, arguably cool.

  35. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by Fantom42 · · Score: 1

    patrikf must be pissed!

  36. ORLY? (n/t) by toby · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    you had me at #!
  37. exactly by unity100 · · Score: 1

    just remember how you were when grown up. what you speak of are stuff done when one's a kid. not mature. back then there were different shit we were all doing. today there is 'hacking'. tomorrow there will be some different shit.

  38. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by baseballjones · · Score: 1

    hehe, i like how "PINBALL SCIENCE--WINDOWS 95/98" was listed as a similar item

    --
    the sunshine bores the daylights out of me
  39. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by baseballjones · · Score: 1

    it would have come out anyway, after a wave of "my uid is lower than yours" comments

    --
    the sunshine bores the daylights out of me
  40. Goatse by rudlavibizon · · Score: 1

    Why didn't you sell goatse.cx?

  41. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    "He" outbid me by $50 on the last day.

  42. hohoho by sectionboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is the "Anonymous Coward" now?

  43. The EFF thanks you by btempleton · · Score: 4, Informative

    On behalf of the E.F.F. I would like to thank the crew at /. for doing this, and all the bidders for showing your geek cred and generousity to bring things up to this level. Our hardworking staff of technologists and lawyers will do great work with this money as we stand up to the NSA, AT&T, the RIAA and many other players trying to take away your rights. You can look at the long list of things we're doing at the www.eff.org web site, as well as past history. That we do all that with our modest staff continues to amaze me, and I'm inside.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:The EFF thanks you by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  44. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    Ah, it does show the winner! For some strange reason I suffered from the delusion that I had looked and that it concealed everyone's ID, including the winner.

    Anyway, kudos to netelder. I personally think this makes him cool, and I was the first to put myself down as a friend of his new account.

  45. Re:Anonymous Coward (87) by The+Grey+Ghost · · Score: 1

    The big surprise was the anonymous reader who bought the Swag Bag AND the Low UID:


    Since when do anonymous cowards have UIDs? Hey now! When you put $5K on the table, you're no longer a coward. "Anonymous reader"
  46. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by daybot · · Score: 1

    WTF? Why was I moderated "Over-rated" down to 0 on the parent post? If you've got something to say about the post, why not, like, join the discussion?

  47. netelder confesses by netelder · · Score: 1
    Yup, you caught me.

    I've been supporting the EFF on and off for years, and thought that this would be a fun way to encourage others to go out of their way to join the cause. I don't really have a use for the low UID because:

    • I've been married to the most wonderful woman on the earth for 28 years, and have no desire to date either Natalie or Giselle (I know who Natalie is, but who's Giselle?)
    • I'm not exactly a Slashdot Maven (I think that this is my fifth post in the history of Slashdot), although I read it constantly, and
    • I was a geek *long* before it was cool to be a geek, and am amused by the concept of a low UID having any street cred!
    BTW, I didn't even know that I was outed until a friend sent me an email. So you can add cluelessness to my panoply of sins (*grin*).

    Anyway, thanks to Rob and the /. team for a great auction, and for doing their best to constantly do the right thing for the Geek community! Keep the faith, guys!

  48. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by netelder · · Score: 1

    Sorry, Pipingguy. I didn't swoop, just set a high max bid. The autobid system did all the dirty work (*grin*).

  49. Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    If I'd have won I'd have had to live it down forever anyway.
    Regards,
    Paul