Slashdot Mirror


The History of Slashdot Part 4 - Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow

Today, on the last day of our 10 year anniversary navel gazing spectacular, I present the final (thank god!) chapter in my 4 part history of Slashdot. I've written about the creation, the explosion, and the corporatization. Today I talk about where we are today, and what I see as our future, and how I feel about it. Clicky click the magic link below to read the last "thrilling" chapter, and celebrate with me the fact that I won't have to spend this much time writing about Slashdot for another decade.

As the dust settled following the dot-com bust, we would see only minor changes to Slashdot. Hemos moved to Boston both to be closer to Andover HQ, and to get his wife in commute range for her grad school work. Nate went to California when his wife got a teaching job. Both moved to Ann Arbor a few years later, as did CowboyNeal, Samzenpus & I. The band was back together, and has been for the last several years.

These days we have a little office in A2 where we do much the same things as we have always done. Jeff spends way to much time in conference calls with corporate offices. He's got a fancy VP title which means he makes the big bucks in exchange for radiating his head on a cel phone. But he's always been a people person so I think that suits him just fine. Nate is an engineer for SourceForge and working on his own advanced degrees. CowboyNeal is on leave right now, but we're looking forward to his return. Samzenpus still sits at the receptionist desk scaring away the door to door salesmen that still seem to show up randomly with no clue what we do. We conduct most of our affairs via a jabber channel where people on both coasts work together.

At the end of all of it, I'm happy that I still get to work with my oldest friends, as well as a number of really honestly great people we've had to good fortune to meet up with in the last decade. And beyond that, I've had the good fortune to work with a number of other smart and cool people that have gone on to bigger and better things. On some level, the memories and people are the most important part of life, and I'm very happy with how that has gone.

As for Slashdot itself, there's a theme in the discussions about Slashdot jumping the shark. That theme has resurfaced regularly for our entire lifespan. From the creation of user accounts in 1998 on, every action we take on Slashdot provokes a 'This is the end of Slashdot' from someone. But what this tells me is that we actually haven't jumped the shark at all- if we had, they'd stop saying the same thing every time we do anything. You learn a lot in my position about large communities: Most of you never say a word... only the most passionate of you ever post. And an angry user is 10 fold more likely to post than a happy one. And when nobody can agree on anything... well there's meaning in that too.

At the end of the day, we've done some reasonably great things over the years. Take for example Sep 11. On that day the mainstream news websites buckled under the loads, and although we had to turn off logging, we managed to stay up, sharing news in a time where it was often difficult to get. That was the day where the team of engineers that make this site happen pulled together and did the impossible, forcing our limited little hardware cluster to handle traffic that was probably triple or quadruple a normal day.

Or take Columbine. When this tragedy hit, our readers took it a differently. Instead of blaming video games, we looked hard at the culture of abuse that drives high school. We talked about how the jocks beat us up. We knew that the terrible events of that day are almost inevitable when you stick kids into a system where certain groups of kids are given free reign to beat up others based on extra curricular activities. During that series of stories many people had a place to talk. It was cathartic. Our role was small, but it mattered.

Darker moments like those are rare, but there are countless other moments good and bad. Many you see on the page, and others you don't. From little successes like trading banner ads for office chairs or the time Gamara chucked Hemos's cel phone into an empty ice bucket... except it wasn't empty. Or the time the crazy guy showed up at our office and offered to give Samzenpus his car in exchange for 5 minutes of time with CmdrTaco, where he would "Reverse Engineer My Life". I proposed to my wife here... and she accepted and now years later we have a baby. I couldn't begin to enumerate the countless moments that have made the last decade here awesome.

I have other thoughts that are perhaps more bleak. There's a possible dark future for Slashdot if corporate interests take over. There's constant pressure from within the company to create new "products". Sometimes these mean new/more/bigger ads which usually result in people installing junkbusters. Far worse is the occasional attempt to create some sort of content partnership that blurs the lines between legitimate Slashdot content, and the paying advertiser's message. I hate these meetings because I have to constantly be the guy that says 'No'. My worst fear for Slashdot is that someday someone with deep enough pockets comes along with a check so big that someone in the company with a shortsighted view of the future is willing to cash over top of my objections.

Likewise, there is pressure for us to grow as a site, but this has 2 major problems. The first is that our audience was here in the 90s: we were the early adopters that made the internet great in the first place. Our growth will never match the population of the net because we are a small group that isn't growing: we were here first. Second is my personal feeling that marketing is just icky: read if you want. Or don't. If you don't find us on your own, you probably weren't meant to be here. That's my Gen-X showing I think, but it's still how I feel. And it really doesn't help when people on-line regard Alexa as legitimate and definitive. We could gain traffic by posting boobs or covering other subjects, but that would distract us from our real focus. And it would drive you guys away.

Similarly, new websites and technologies arise regularly. From Kuro5hin to Digg to Reddit, there have been dozens of websites that do similar things to Slashdot with varying degrees of success. Some have surpassed us, while most have faded into obscurity. From AJAX interfaces to alternate methodologies of content selection, they all have ideas, some good, so bad... some right for Slashdot, and some wrong. Distinguishing one from the other is tricky: you guys all deserve a modern web application, but at the end of the day, our story selection and discussions are what make this site unique. Drastic changes would alienate our long-term user base, so we need to tread cautiously.

A 10 year anniversary is a good time to think about what a 20 year anniversary would be like. And I think that the only way that Slashdot in 2017 is as good as Slashdot in 2007 is if we continue to maintain editorial independence, moderate advertising quantity with a clear distinction between advertising and content, and of course, that we continue to select the right stories to appeal to our existing audience... not to spend our time courting other audiences that would only dilute the discussions that bring so many of you here day after day.

For me personally I've spent a lot of time this month reflecting on Slashdot and my role here. Every day, 7 days a week, from my first cup of coffee until the moment I close the lid on my laptop, Slashdot is a part of my day. It's most of my browser tabs, most of my chat windows, and most of my inbox. And that's fine because I love this place: the readers, the content, and the people I work with. I'm honored that I continue to be the caretaker of this place.

Of course I've been here my entire adult life and I doubt that will always remain true. Certainly to leave would leave a hole in my life. But it's a constant struggle to maintain the site up to my standards. It's a struggle that I often win, but occasionally lose too. On some level, what keeps me here is knowing exactly what would happen within a few months of my departure. I don't like that one bit.

But let me end on a high note: I am very aware of Slashdot's unique place in the history of the internet. There's no way I could thank everyone that made that possible, but you all know who you are. I dream that in 2017 we can look back at 20 years and be just as proud of our second decade as our first. Keep reading. Keep submitting stories. Keep posting, moderating and meta moderating. If it isn't to much trouble, click on a banner ad every now and then. And hopefully I'll see you then.

--
Rob Malda
Pants are Optional

277 comments

  1. Not now my friends, not ever by Ckwop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate these meetings because I have to constantly be the guy that says 'No'. My worst fear for Slashdot is that someday someone with deep enough pockets comes along with a check so big that someone in the company with a shortsighted view of the future is willing to cash over top of my objections.

    I share your fear that one day that will happen, Rob. I don't want to see that happen: not now, not ever. To make this absolutely clear, the day that happens is the day I tip my cap and leave this site for good.

    Personally, I wish you'd never sold the site and continued to run it with the original team but there is no use crying over spilt milk. We are where we are.

    At some point, Rob is going to have to take a stand against these goons and defend Slashdot from corporate greed. He says he already is but I fear like the Ring of Power, the pull becomes stronger over time and it will develop in to a darker more insidious threat. To defend against this threat successfully he will need convincing evidence that Slashdot will be thoroughly destroyed if the enemy prevails.

    I hope people will stand with me today and that this thread will form part of that defence.

    If you agree with what I've said can you please reply to this thread with "I agree." Let's send these people a message that ultimately this site exists for us. We are their customers, not the advertisers.

    Simon

    1. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Cerberus7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There used to be about a dozen web sites I visited on a daily basis. Of them, all that remains is Slashdot. Why? Because it hasn't gone off the corporate deep end and become that blurry mess of marketing and content that Rob's talking about in this essay. Now and again I see that deep end getting closer on this site, but it always seems to fall away into the horizon. If it ever does actually go all the way, I'm with you. I'll leave.

      I agree.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    2. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Qwrk · · Score: 1

      Wholeheartedly; I agree !

    3. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by cyphercell · · Score: 2

      I agree, if I wanted a Digg/Cnet/facebook/ad-driven abomination, I'd be on those sites. Honestly I don't understand what the hell these arseholes are thinking when they take a good site and try to blend it with four other decent sites. It's ridiculous, people watch ESPN because it's the sports channel, people like slashdot because it's "news for nerds", why anyone would think that changing that would lead to anything other than yet another crap-ass-inthered-social-network is beyond me.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    4. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by OglinTatas · · Score: 2, Funny

      too bad the moderators will mod every "I agree" post redundant :-D

    5. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      Selling out is the American way! It's going to happen to Slashdot eventually. For proof, look at the great rock band the Who. First, they're bathing in baked beans on the cover of a record, and next their tunes are being hacked up for the opening music on three different CSI TV shows. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing is more American than making a buck.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    6. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      You have my bow!

      --
      You mad
    7. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      * There's a knock at the door *
      Taco: Who's there?
      Door: Goons.
      Taco: Who?
      Door: Hired goons.
      Taco: Oh, c'mon in!

      On a more serious note, I agree!

    8. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. I would leave Slashdot if it became just another ad-encrusted site.

      I think one of the problems is that businesses are almost always under pressure to expand. Merely maintaining the same revenue year by year is considered a failure, even though everyone is making good money (and even if the revenue is growing enough to offset inflation, and pay investors a reasonable return).

      The obsession with expanding means that businesses are always trying to think in terms of "getting more customers" and "appealing to a wider base" and so forth. The problem is that there are already lots of companies (or websites in this case) that appeal to that generic audience. Adding yourself into that pool certainly doesn't guarantee increasing profits.

      If Slashdot remains true to its roots, it will continue to do well, and to attract a very particular audience. Our numbers are actually growing, since each new generation will have some proportion of nerds/geeks who, upon discovering Slashdot, think to themselves "I have finally found people just like me! This place is great!" Of course Slashdot's readership won't grow as fast as something like Facebook that is designed to appeal to everyone... but that shouldn't be its focus.

      In short, if Slashdot continues to pander to its unique demographic, it will continue to have a dedicated readership, and hence a guaranteed revenue stream.

    9. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious fucking business.

    10. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      If this site becomes a advertising haven with tons of obtrusive distracting ads then I'm gone. Currently I use Adblock Plus... Works great for blocking all ads! Take that!

    11. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      Selling out is the American way! It's going to happen to Slashdot eventually. For proof, look at the great rock band the Who. Nice analogy - except for the fact that The Who aren't exactly American.
    12. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by scjazz · · Score: 1

      I agree... ehh don't have to say much more.

    13. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Alu3205 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. Slashdot is unique because of the community. That community can be moved or rebuilt to another site very easily and quickly.

      --
      Slashdot comments can be accurate, highly modded, or posted quickly. Pick two.
    14. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by aran+aran · · Score: 1

      I agree

    15. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by DCTooTall · · Score: 1, Funny

      I Agree!


      Wait.... um... Guess I should clarify that I agree to both the Original post.... as well as your take on the Mods.... ;-)

    16. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by apdyck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I likewise agree. On that note, it should be mentioned that, a few years ago, I moved to a small community in the Northwest Territories, and they only had 33.6 dialup there. During this time, despite the fact that I had a second phone line that was dedicated to this slow connection, I stopped visiting many of the web sites that I previously frequented. In fact, there were only two that I visited every day. One was slashdot, and the other was User Friendly. Slashdot kept me in touch with the tech community, something that was very needed in a community where there was a grand total of ONE technical person (aside from myself) in the whole town. That guy had to wear multiple hats - he was the IT guy for the oil company in town (the #1 employer), and he was the line tech for the phone company. He has moved on to bigger and better things, and now the new IT guy for that oil co is struggling just to maintain the status quo - he even begged me to move back and take over his job. Of course, to do that would be to give up my high speed Internet connection (AKA my lifeline), and that's not going to happen.

      Anyhow, I digress. Slashdot has been a big part of my life. I first came across it when I was in high school, back in the early days, and am now on my second account (I lost the password on my first one, and no longer had the e-mail address) - and I love it. Slashdot has been my source for all IT related news for almost nine years now, and I wouldn't give it up for the world. Keep up the good work, guys, and we will all keep coming back!

      I would also like to make a note that, in my younger days, I was involved in some minor Slashdot-related graffiti - I have on a few occasions written /. in bathroom stalls and various other places, a stark contrast to the graffiti that most people leave. I can only hope that this has encouraged some people to find out what the site was, and to increase the knowledge of the site. Unfortunately, I think it only contributed to the amount of work that the janitorial staff had to do. This isn't something that I continue to do, as I have grown into a much more respectable person than I was then, but I still am tempted any time I walk into a washroom that is covered in graffiti!

      --
      .sig
    17. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Selling out is the American way! It's going to happen to Slashdot eventually. For proof, look at the great rock band the Who. First, they're bathing in baked beans on the cover of a record, and next their tunes are being hacked up for the opening music on three different CSI TV shows. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing is more American than making a buck.

      There was no compromise of principals there. They sold the rights to existing back catalog material.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    18. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      I Agree...'nuff said.

      **off topic, but am I the only one who seems to get singularly apropos captchas on a regular basis?

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    19. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. I think that Rob realizes what some C-level executive might not: this is a community of technically skilled people. Most of the people here are early adopters and have come to slashdot because it's different. If Slashdot becomes a clone of something else, then the people on this site will migrate elsewhere and they'll have to settle with the scraps from Digg's table.

      That said, Rob's done a great job, and I'm sure he'll continue to do so. And when the corporate overlords overpower him, I'm sure he'll rise again, more powerful than they could possibly imagine ;) Or, at the very least, with another high-traffic site that's profitable, but not as much as it could be if it sold out.

    20. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by DanDare · · Score: 1

      I agree, but if the corporates take over then slashdot will die very quickly :(, Let's enjoy it whilst it is still here....

    21. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by multisync · · Score: 1

      If you agree with what I've said can you please reply to this thread with "I agree." Let's send these people a message that ultimately this site exists for us. We are their customers, not the advertisers.


      I agree. If Slashdot ever starts pandering to the advertisers or putting corporate interest ahead of those of long-time visitors, I'm out of here too.

      Now, about the boobs ...
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    22. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Nice analogy - except for the fact that The Who aren't exactly American."

      Ok, how did that go...

      "Fool me once and...err, Fool me twice, and then...I won't get Fooled Agai....uh, Who?"

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Slack_Attack_007 · · Score: 1

      I've been lurking around here for about 7 of these past 10 years. In all that time, this is my first post. I whole heartedly agree with you.

    24. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "That said, Rob's done a great job, and I'm sure he'll continue to do so. And when the corporate overlords overpower him, I'm sure he'll rise again, more powerful than they could possibly imagine ;) Or, at the very least, with another high-traffic site that's profitable, but not as much as it could be if it sold out."

      Hmm...when they sold to the corp. types....did they sell the rights to the /. domain too?

      Would be sweet if he owned that and could take it with him if they tried to strong arm him too much....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by budgenator · · Score: 1

      you don't really need adblocking, nine time out of ten I've scrolled past where the ads are placed before the lamo servers can serve them.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      If not he could always come up with a domain name that indicates he's taking a step back from slashdot, like maybe dotdotslash...

    27. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by mattOzan · · Score: 1

      I went to a 10 Year Anniversary party in my hometown to celebrate this website. *That* should indicate the unique place Slashdot has internet culture. It transcends webspace and enters meatspace.

      The idea of getting together with strangers over *any* other news website is just absurd. The idea of anyone even wanting to organize such gatherings is absurd.

      The symbiosis between this site and its users makes it a community like no other, and you have done very well at maintaining that relationship.

      IMO, it is the only place on the internet where the comments aren't a waste of time and bits. If you have to sellout and mass market something, make it Slash!

    28. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Bruce Parens has a site, technocrat.net the articles aren't too shabby, the theme is stone ugly and the code needs plenty of work, the kind of thing that could explode if /. goes down the tubes.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    29. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember those days too. I was thinking a few days ago that I remember going to more websites per day. I tried to remember their names, but got stuck at geek.net. Now I pretty much just hang around slashdot, and userfriendly, with occasional stop-offs at multiply or linkedin.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    30. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by keithius · · Score: 1

      I agree. ("Yes, I do indeed concur, wholeheartedly!")

      --
      "Programming is the fine art of making a machine that has absolutely no intelligence act as though it does."
    31. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Themer · · Score: 1

      I agree. Even though I haven't been registered long, I have been a long time lurker.

    32. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by MikeUW · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I'd also add that while I would miss /. should it someday disappear, I'm not really worried about what will happen if it does. It would be particularly bad for those closest/most involved. However, I know that there are enough smart people here that the community would likely re-emerge more or less intact, with essentially all of the same ideals, but hosted/managed elsewhere.

    33. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I agree.

      I've been reading some books on nonprofit management lately. The biggest thing they all push is "Know your mission, stick to your mission." I have a feeling that for-profit businesses probably benefit from the same advice. Hopefully the people who own Slashdot will follow it.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    34. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      (This exact comment has already been posted. Try to be more original...)

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    35. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The obsession with expanding means that businesses are always trying to think in terms of "getting more customers" and "appealing to a wider base" and so forth. The problem is that there are already lots of companies (or websites in this case) that appeal to that generic audience. Adding yourself into that pool certainly doesn't guarantee increasing profits. And yet, expanding is not a bad idea, but that is not the only way to expand.

      It used to be that TV shows would get dumbed down or junk the shark to appeal to a wider variety of people. Now instead you see more and more spinoffs. They leverage the skill and some of the familiarity of the old show to create a new show that appeals to a different group, or to get more views to what could in some ways be "the same show".

      If slashdot wants to grow I hope they do it by setting up sister sites instead. They have the experience, code and hardware to set up sister sites for different audiences. Maybe something as simple as spinning off politics and YRO, with more politically savvy editors. Maybe doing joint stories with AnimeFu, to liven things up. Maybe setting up a digg-wannabe site, with a slash-style discussions. You could try out (marked) slashvertisements on other sites and see how people react while the mother-site stays the same (since you already know ./ers would reject them).

      Or work with a social networking site to connect user profiles, journals and discussions together with all their other features (if the users choose to).

      Of course, you'd have to help these sites grow. Joint stories, publishing selected top stories on each other's front page, ads back and forth, advice to the editors of the new sites, etc. Growing while keeping the original community alive and safe, but leveraging the experience of your old admins.

      The styles of the sites should diverge, and some sites will sell off more than others. Some sites will use more AJAX, more pictures, more OMG ponies, more whatever. Rob knows already what this community needs. Start another site and figure what their community needs. It's a lot easier to do this for /. and co than for anybody else.
    36. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Kemanorel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh! Oh! I know! Spin off a site about ponies!

      OMG PONIES!!!

      (That was just me needing to vent off some of the stupid I acquired trying to teach set-builder notation to 13-year-olds)

      --
      Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
    37. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, now that you've proved the GP's point, shouldn't you be re-modded funny? But then you wouldn't have proved the point, so you'd have to be re-re-modded redundant. My head hurts.

    38. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by marcelC · · Score: 1

      I Agree!

    39. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Faizdog · · Score: 1

      can't say it any better than others already have, so... I agree!

      --
      -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
    40. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by xenophyx · · Score: 1

      First post! (for me that is)

      I've stuck with this site for many years, always appreciating the fact that, when I come here, I get what I'm looking for. And that is exactly why I come back, day after day.

      Even the thought of that happening sends a chill down my spine, because we've all watched it happen too many times.

      So let me take the time, and actually say something here:

      Thank you to everyone here for making it what it is.

      And

      I wholeheartedly agree.

    41. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by ojs · · Score: 1

      Agree. Just to show support.

      If this site becomes anything like Digg or whatever, then I am at a loss of a good geek site again (got tired of /. for a while, but am back now and a happy camper).

    42. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      I too agree. Slashdot has been the stalwart battlement that all geeks know they can head to for decent trolls, flame wars and technical discussions. The advertisements don't blast me in the face (even wired is guilty of this - though they did apologise profusely), and as we saw recently and as kebes has already said, our numbers continue to grow. Keep up the good work Rob, and team.

      Cheers

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    43. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by ifitzgerald · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd leave, too, under those circumstances.

    44. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by cloricus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I nearly left when the Intel section crap started... It was a good idea if Intel would have been serious about it but it quickly became blatant that it was an ad driven dream for them and a monster for Slashdot. It is as simple as that for me, as long as Rob (or for more fun CmdrTaco) is in charge and calls the shoots I can't see myself leaving, when it becomes clear he no longer has control I'll be off.

      A note to the corporate overlords now and in the future; I often click on the ads on this site, as they tend to be topical to services we need to implement and we have gone on to purchase several services from ads here. While us readers mostly would have been in high school and college when we started reading the majority of us now work in IT and call the shoots or suggest solutions to problems. As time goes on our potential to increase profits through ads increases and from that point of view do you really want to piss us off and replace us with a digg like crowd who can't even afford their own broadband from their parents basements?
      Erm, yes, I agree. :)

      --
      I ate your fish.
    45. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree

      To the mods, ignore this whole part of the thread (All the "I agree"s) as we are not interested in being called redundant. We are voicing an opinion and a belief.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    46. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      It used to be that TV shows would get dumbed down or junk the shark to appeal to a wider variety of people. Now instead you see more and more spinoffs. They leverage the skill and some of the familiarity of the old show to create a new show that appeals to a different group, or to get more views to what could in some ways be "the same show".
      What, like TechTV? If only they had kept eyedrops...
      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    47. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Dear sir, I agree.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    48. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by posdnous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. Slashdot is unique because of the community. That community can be moved or rebuilt to another site very easily and quickly.

      Not on you life, once slashdot is gone, it will be gone forever. What makes slashdot so great is not the people who post on every single story giving their opinions, it's the people who only post rarely but when they do, they REALLY know the topic area, that's why you can be guaranteed to learn something in every discussion. If slashdot is reduced just to the "regulars", in the event of a rebuilt clone site, the level of groupthink would make the level of discussion monotonous and ultimately uninteresting.

    49. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by im_dan · · Score: 1

      I Agree

      --
      Look over their, it's a grammar nazi
    50. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Question (1) Given a set {x: x=Pony^Natalie} where {y: y=x^OMG^pink^frolic}. Can we infer x>y, and why?

    51. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It already happened a few months ago with the Intel ad-section where Intel marketing got to talk about some of their new stuff. It turned me off from reading those articles but luckily they were clearly marked. If they wouldn't have been, I would've forked Slashdot or so.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    52. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by krishn_bhakt · · Score: 1

      When the house is no more fit to live
      Make a new one, move
      Change is inevitable
      I agree

      --
      The Answer Lies in The Genome
    53. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. There are a lot of other places on the internet to get tech news. If Slashdot was compromised in such a manner, I certainly would not read it every day, and probably not at all.

    54. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Igwah · · Score: 1

      This has got to be one of my only posts, however I'd like to say I agree. As someone who's lurked through high school and now enjoys reading /. and drinking coffee under the pretence of "working" (I do honestly use this place to stay abreast of new technology, new trends and I.T. in general) for many years, I'd just like to say thanks and keep it up. Surely you should be able to advertise on this site in a similar fashion to Penny-Arcade, who now have the luxury of high revenue, low annoyance ads.

    55. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by root-a-begger · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recent articles. Its good to hear this retrospective.
      Slashdot's corporate overlord, LNUX http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=LNUX, is either undervalued or underutilized (undermanaged?). In either case, the pressure would seem high to pillage every nook and cranny of the company to get the share price back up while the market is hot.

      I fully agree that keeping the community as it is holds better long term value and I hope Rob and the rest of the Slashdot team get their way.

      I am one of the majority; a lurker that doesn't post much. In fact, although I've read Slashdot since its beginnings, I didn't bother to create an ID till a few years ago.

      Thanks for your hard work. I wish you a satisfying 10 more years!!!!

    56. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Praedon · · Score: 1

      I agree, I would as well. Slashdot is what it is, Slashdot! If the integrity is changed/destroyed, it would not be what I signed up for, or visit to get my every four hour fix on news.

      --
      Just me
    57. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by osoi · · Score: 1

      I agree!

    58. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by vinlud · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    59. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree

      And I'll quickly move to whatever new site Rob and team will create if the marketing leeches make them leave with disgust.

    60. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by a9db0 · · Score: 1
      From Rob-

      what keeps me here is knowing exactly what would happen within a few months of my departure. I don't like that one bit. From Ckwop-

      the day that happens is the day I tip my cap and leave this site for good. I agree with both. It would be a very bad day for the slashdot community. And it would also mean it's time for me to retire my ID and go find something else to read.

      The departure of Rob would undoubtedly mean a decline in the overall story quality. Not immediately, I'm sure, as Jamie, CN, etc would soldier on. But for how long, and with how much influence? Rob's very much the "spiritual leader" of this community. He founded it, and the principles that guide it are his. But without him to stand up and say "No" with the authority of a leader those who would exploit this creation would eventually win. I know that day will come, and it will be a sad day for us all. I'm just hoping that it's long after the 20 year retrospective. Slashdot's been a huge part of my online life for longer than I care to remember. It's been informative and interesting and funny and infuriating. And it's kept me coming back.

      Rob, thanks for the last decade. And I'm looking forward the next one.
      --
      -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    61. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      I agree, and, for one, welcome our oh forget it.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    62. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by mkoko · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree

    63. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by kalakala · · Score: 1

      I don't say much here...but this is a good moment to say: I Agree

      --
      matar a un hombre no es defender una idea es matar a un hombre
    64. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by langarto · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have been reading slashdot since so long that I cannot remember. Much longer before I got an account. I hope to be able to read it 10 years from now.

    65. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by oZt · · Score: 0

      I agree. A lot.

    66. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I'm a rather new subscriber, but something I'm sure of is that Slashdot is waht it is because it has focused on doing one thing right: delivering the right content to people like us. It could certainly have more users, make more money, be more popular... for a while. And the sad thing is that corporate typea don't care that much about the long run. Long-term gain is preferred, not required. Strong communities can't survive in this context. From a relatively new user: let's keep Slashdot like it is.

    67. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by dublintom · · Score: 1

      I agree !

    68. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by deftcoder · · Score: 1

      This is my 4th Slashdot account... (I get bored and reset once in a while and see how long it takes to get mod points again)

      I agree!

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    69. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Agree!

    70. Re:Not now my friends, not ever by LaPatriaGrande · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'll leave, too.

  2. So wise... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're so wise it makes me sick. Why can't more people be like Rob?

    Seriously, if you want to make a killing off of Slashdot without making changes that would kill Slashdot, you should expand your articles into a full-length book. Your site is officially an Internet institution. You are a bonafide part of geek culture now, which makes your perspective unique and interesting. You also have proven experience in building a successful community from nothing to millions, which would come in very handy in lots of industries and fields, both small and large.

    Plus, when the book is reviewed and the link is posted in the article, you could earn royalties AND sales commission, how sweet is that?

    Who knows, maybe you could even patent some of your methods of community-building, and then post an article on how evil you've become. ;-)

    1. Re:So wise... by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's an outstanding idea, actually - a Slashdot retrospective in book form, featuring some of the bigger stories, memes, etc. could represent both a good business opportunity and avoid conflicting with the site's overall direction.

      One issue I could see would be how they would include comments in such a book and not get into royalty issues, since, as they've always said, "Comments are owned by the Poster."

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:So wise... by jamie · · Score: 4, Informative

      We're unlikely to try including very many comments in a book. That didn't work out so well last time...

    3. Re:So wise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One issue I could see would be how they would include comments in such a book and not get into royalty issues, since, as they've always said, "Comments are owned by the Poster."

      Yes, but he doesn't seem to be very active around here.

    4. Re:So wise... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      If this ever goes ahead I hope to god its not a picture book.
      We can do without a centre page spread.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:So wise... by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      When I did an undergraduate course on ethics and law in computer science in 2002 at Reading university, the lecturer said in the very first session that if we were serious about understanding such things we should all read slashdot regulerly.

      Before that day I didn't even know slashdot existed, and to start with I didn't get it. Now though its in my set of 'during morning coffee' bookmarks, and gets looked at a few times a day.

    6. Re:So wise... by mbrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember the issues with the book. However I do wish you would publish a monthly magazine highlighting the hot topics of the month and reference some of the better points brought up in the discussions on the site.

      Charge like 20-50 bucks a year and throw a symbol of some sort next to the names of those users subscribing. This would help with revenue, give us a service we would like, and keep the Corporate overlords off your backs for a while due to the increased revenue.

  3. Congratulations! by nbvb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Congratulations on 10 years of hard work. You have a lot to be proud of.

    Keep fighting the good fight.

    I still swear some days that the trolls are going to drive me out, but here I am .... still here.

    And as an aside - Slashdot (and its ads... believe it or not.) led me to one of the best decisions I ever made in my career.

    Moons ago, you had an ad running for some company called "Ironport". They had a neat device that was just a mail delivery engine. As a company that has over 60 million customers, that's important to us. When customers' bills are ready, we're sending, well, 60 million emails. So such a "spam cannon:" is important.

    Anyway, that simple banner ad on Slashdot put me in touch with the folks at Ironport, and here we are, 5+ years later, with a completely modern email infrastructure that Just Works (tm). The Ironport folks made some changes to their appliances to meet our particular needs, and it's been a great partnership for us.

    Thanks guys. And if it weren't for that "icky" advertising, it would've never happened.

    1. Re:Congratulations! by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thanks guys. And if it weren't for that "icky" advertising, it would've never happened.
      Many months ago, I installed AdBlock and Filterset.G Updater. Then proceeded to never give it any thought again.

      Rob's request and your comment made me think. In Firefox,
      • I clicked Tools -> AdBlock
      • Then checked the [x] whitelist this whole site
      I didn't start clicking ads right away; I only will do so if I'm genuinly interested. However, I encourage everyone to whitelist the site. It's a way to support slashdot.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:Congratulations! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      There's no way I would be hypocritical and enable ads just because I like a site. If I'm going to leech resources from one organization, I'm leeching them from all the organizations. Particularly the one that has a culture of encouraging leeching.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:Congratulations! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have white listed Slashdot but then I have to turn it off again. I just can not stand animated ads! They are just two distracting.
      I will probably try again because most of the companies that advertise on Slashdot have products I am interested in but for good grief don't allow animated banners!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Congratulations! by josephdrivein · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on 10 years of hard work. You have a lot to be proud of.

      Keep fighting the good fight. Agreed.

      Thank you, Rob. Slashdot wouldn't be the same without you.
      I hope to be here in 2017.

      ~joseph
    5. Re:Congratulations! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I see. So slashdot is no different to you than, say, cnn.com?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    6. Re:Congratulations! by pcol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Congratulations on 10 years of slashdot.

      I think you've found the formula for the best discussion of technical and scientific issues on the web - editor selected stories and reader moderated comments.

      Whenever I think of a story to post to slashdot, I try to anticipate how people are going to respond, but when a story is accepted, I am always amazed by the diversity of opinion and the startling insights I see generated. Slashdot is online brainstorming at its best with the benefit of tens of thousands of smart people looking at an idea and providing their unique points of view .

      I think Vernor Vinge said it best in his dedication to Rainbows End. "To the Internet-based cognitive tools that are changing our lives -- Wikipedia, Google, eBay, and the others of their kind, now and in the future"

      To that distinguished group, I would definitely add slashdot.

      Best Regards and hopes for 10 more years of slashdot success.

    7. Re:Congratulations! by TechwoIf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would do this if there was a /. option to NOT display any microsoft or other corps that I would never do business with.

    8. Re:Congratulations! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Amen. Very good idea, which I hope is picked up.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    9. Re:Congratulations! by saratchandra · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing right away after reading Rob's post! The post definitely resonated with my *soul* ;)

    10. Re:Congratulations! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the famous Slashdot SoulVibe.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  4. Too long, didn't read by Trespass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The future of Slashdot is identical with it's past: Hot grits, Digg circlejerks, and all the Roland Pipperqquualalllelee you can eat.

    1. Re:Too long, didn't read by vipw · · Score: 1

      And we'll still all be there, lapping it up

  5. Sept 11th by lthown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, Slashdot was where I first heard about it. It's was just after the first plane hit - I seem to recall at the time it was thought it was a small plane. The second followed shortly with additional information.

    1. Re:Sept 11th by nbvb · · Score: 1

      I heard about it when I saw the black smoke out the front window of my house. I was living at the time on the lower side of the New Jersey Palisades, so I was able to see the smoke rising, but not the tips of the towers (The palisades cliffs were between me and the towers.)

      I drove to Boulevard East in Weehawken, just in time to watch the Southtower collapse.

      One of the most awful days of my life.

    2. Re:Sept 11th by lthown · · Score: 1

      hey, let's try that again - this time with gooder grammer: Actually, Slashdot was where I first herd about it. It was just after the first plane hit - I seem to recall at the time it was thought it was a small plane. The second followed shortly with additional information on slashdot. CNN and even my local news web sites were offline.

    3. Re:Sept 11th by Qwrk · · Score: 1
      Last week I was just looking up some thingie in my archives and I noticed there were loads of screenies and saved web pages from /. dated 9-11. It was quite a thing to have /. still online where the other parts of the grid just crumbled.

      Heck, last time I swapped ISP was because the new one didn't think usenet was a worthwhile part of the offer. I couldn't solve many a techical issue without it. What's left of the basics of the net, now that I come to think about it. Any of you guys still FTP ? Or gopher ? Finger ? [I agree, the last one was a joke ;-)]

    4. Re:Sept 11th by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      there is some hilarious joke about dupes in their ...

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    5. Re:Sept 11th by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I still FTP on a regular basis.

    6. Re:Sept 11th by Qwrk · · Score: 1
      And right you are! Would you be able to make an estimate though how many of todays computer users know the speed of such a protocol? I'm using it on a daily basis as it's unsurpassed. And what to think of those who pop their eyes out for not even knowing 'ping', or to use 'telnet' to rid themselves of some blob blocking their incoming mail.

      Just today I tagged an old box to donate to the Digibarn [good cause!] and I'd be interested to learn who can still remember that [under CP/M] it was the cats ass to rename 'PIP' to 'COPY' cos that's what is was supposed to do. ['PIP' being the horrendous acronym for the 'peripheral interchange program'.... Copy ;-)]

    7. Re:Sept 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, let's try that a third time with gooder spelling:

      Actually, Slashdot was where I first herd about it. heard
  6. More boobs! by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We could gain traffic by posting boobs ... it would drive you guys away."

    Posting boobs wouldn't drive me away! I promise!
    (unless they are saggy granny boobs or man boobs)

    1. Re:More boobs! by xgr3gx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah-ha, perhaps we can have a "sideboob" slashdot section. sideboob.slashdot.org.
      Postings about various sideboob sightings. Don't they have a website like that? Oh yeah...tmz, E entertainment, etc etc.

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    2. Re:More boobs! by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are these "boobs" you speak of? Would I need to leave the basement to see them? Oh, you don't mean IN PERSON! Whew, you scared me there for a sec...

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    3. Re:More boobs! by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Look some ideas are just plain bad and you can see that, but I think this one has promise. Don't be so quick to dismiss it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:More boobs! by n3tcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      What boobs do you like?
      A) Saggy boobs
      B) Granny boobs
      C) CowboyNeal's boobs

    5. Re:More boobs! by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      It's not a poll without...

      Missing option: Nice, round, perfect-handful boobs.

    6. Re:More boobs! by Brubbel · · Score: 1

      You need to tread cautiously; let's take it one breast at a time.

    7. Re:More boobs! by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh... I think that was the joke...
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    8. Re:More boobs! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Ah-ha, perhaps we can have a "sideboob" slashdot section. sideboob.slashdot.org.

      How about "slutdot"? :)

    9. Re:More boobs! by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Mssing option:


      D) Breasts

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:More boobs! by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Come on, beggars can't be choosers...

    11. Re:More boobs! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      The real joke would be if that option was included and everyone still went with the CowboyNeil option.

    12. Re:More boobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wonder what cmdrtaco's boobs would do to the numbers :)

    13. Re:More boobs! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Missing Option:

      E) W

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    14. Re:More boobs! by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      I hate having to explain it, but the joke wasn't finished. It still needed the requisite bitching about missing poll options. Just because they're missing doesn't mean that that will suffice for the bitching.

    15. Re:More boobs! by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Well... just today I read a comment by this guy Mex who has a link to a page with boobs in his signature:

      free boobs! http://dailygrrl.com/ [dailygrrl.com] [mabe NSFW]

      I for one, find all his post "interesting" :-)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    16. Re:More boobs! by KingKaneOfNod · · Score: 1

      There's already a section about the world's biggest boobs.

  7. Running out of steam? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What disappoints me more than anything else is the slow creep of the "Slashdot groupthink" that, which once was merely a quirky attitude prevalent among a few vocal members, has grown into the mindless anti-IP/anti-corporation/anti-establishment theme of most of the stories posted here. There are very few "nerdy" stories on this site anymore. Most of the stories are either devoted to Google and Apple fanboiism, "IANAL but.." topics, Microsoft/SCO/Bush bashing, or tech update minutia.

    The only readable sections are Science and Developers. YRO has got to be a honeypot for trolls, but how can you tell the difference anymore?

    The 2002-2005 troll eradication has left this site impotent and truly enmeshed in hivethink. Say what you will about their abuses of this site, trolls provided an entertaining, if not reasonably useful, devil's advocate. With only hiveminded thinkers left, like any monopoly, this site has stagnated.

    The heydays are over, I think. And while I hope you make it 20 years, I have serious doubts that this site will make it that far. There are so few things actually covered here at Slashdot, and that list is being constantly trimmed, that I think at some point YRO will be the only section that survives intact. And if that's the case, then that will be a sad day indeed.

    1. Re:Running out of steam? by east+coast · · Score: 5, Interesting

      With only hiveminded thinkers left, like any monopoly, this site has stagnated.

      You God damned shill!

      Seriously, I agree with you. It's getting old that you can't post an honest opinion that isn't pro-OSS, pro-Google or pro-Apple without getting the beat down with the overrated mod.

      I'm sure my protest falls on deaf ears but it really has changed my outlook on how and what I contribute to Slashdot. I've noticed a couple of stories recently that I thought would make good Slashdot material and I simply will not submit them since I think the site has lost so much value. Not to mention that I also lost my mod points for not doing the Slashdot goosestep.

      I don't blame the trolls anymore. Sometime I do a bit of the trolling myself since honest and well thought out posts end with the same moderation in a world where not being dogmatic makes you "just another shill".

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Running out of steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't expect much from someone with an slashdot id of nearly a million. Actually, I love these kind of comments. If you want to group people into categories then why not add one for group think complainers?

    3. Re:Running out of steam? by BendingSpoons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good points. I used to read the YRO & politics sections - there are some interesting posts buried in the bitchfest - but the echo-chamber effect has grown to repulsive proportions. Much like the Apple or MS stories, there's no posts in there that I haven't already read a million times. "I'll never buy anything connected with DRM!" Really? I would never have suspected. "Creationists are such idiots, here's the difference between faith and science." Alright, got it already, thanks.

      That's why I much prefer the science section. There's barely ever a consensus there - someone's always disagreeing someone else. (Of course, unless the story concerns a new expensive venture. Then you have the flood of "I don't know shit about this, but I think it might be a bad idea and it's definitely a waste of money." But hey, nothing's perfect.)

      That said, I don't share parent's pessimism. Slashdot might suck in the future, sure, but where isn't that a possibility? When it sucks, I'll stop coming. Until then I'll keep lurking in the science section.

      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
    4. Re:Running out of steam? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Jamie, you can't possibly be as stupid as you're posting suggests.

    5. Re:Running out of steam? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      you're posting

      Damn! Did I just out myself as CT?

    6. Re:Running out of steam? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just don't get the "groupthink" complaints. Yes, it's probably fair to say that majority of Slashdot readers are pro-F/OSS and anti-Microsoft, but I've seen plenty of good posts defending Windows (for example) modded up. The posts that get modded down tend to be the ones that repeat the same "most popular = best" arguments that anyone with half a brain and any experience knows are simply not true. If you make a well-written, well-thought-out, and factually correct post that points out why Windows does something in particular better than Linux does, people will recognize that and mod accordingly. If you post something that's just a slightly more sophisticated version of "open sores is teh suxorz," don't be surprised when you lose a little karma over it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    7. Re:Running out of steam? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Man, am I tired og this tired old argument. The only groupthink I see is a natural one. Get a lot of people with IT/science backgrounds in one place, and you're bound to get large majorities of opinion on at least some issues.

      But to say there's no diversity is foolish. Stop browsing at +5, you weenie.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re:Running out of steam? by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear this complaint often. (One of my best friends subscribes to the "Slashdot makes me sick with all the group-think and one-sidedness" theories, in fact.)

      I guess I look at it differently. I think one of Slashdot's strengths is its bias. Right now, I can visit any number of commercial web sites, purportedly about "computers and technology", and get a very Microsoft-centric view of things. Problem is, just because 90%+ of the systems out there run Microsoft products doesn't mean I want to read about those products 90%+ of the time! (That would be like a gourmet settling for reading stories about fast food chains 90% of the time, just because fast food operations are that much more prevalent than gourmet restaurants.)

      I really think the *truth* is, there are "best", "good" and "not so good" choices out there in the world of technology and computing. Skashdot takes the stance that OSS is either in the "best" or "good" category (and some stories directly address arguing over which of those 2 labels best applies). Slashdot takes the stance that Apple is doing good, interesting things right now too. Considering I went 10+ years using nothing but PC compatible Wintel boxes, and now I'm almost all converted to Macintosh, I'd say I agree with THAT bias too. And Google? I think anyone bashing them, yet claiming to be into technology, is foolish, bordering on hypocritical. So yes, I'd mod down an "anti Google" post myself, too! (Are they "too big", becoming "evil", or anything else? Nobody seems to be bringing any solid evidence to the table on any of that, right now. All I see is a company that's been giving out an awful lot of really useful, really cool stuff for FREE, and seems poised to put downwards price pressures on the cellphone industry next. Works for me!)

    9. Re:Running out of steam? by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      he is right you know. You wouldn't post in such length if you didn't care anymore. People who don't care wouldn't bother. It's similar to the WoW forums where every minute action by Blizzards causes a torrent of "WoW will die [has already died/will die even more quickly] because of this". WoW and slashdot's death will have one thing in common: it's going to be silent.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    10. Re:Running out of steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dial 911 and call yourself a WAH-mbulance!

      If you're not interested in the burning issues of today, you are the one who has run out of steam.

      Tech today is cooler than ever.

      Google is an innovator. Apple is an innovator. Microsoft is running out of steam but still has momentum.

      SCO was a ship of fools propped up by a Microsoft running out of steam.

      Bush ~is~ a fool but he hasn't stopped innovating as a fool. The Pelosicrats have run out of steam. The Internet is the place where political awareness and discussion is happening.

      What you call "hivethink" may very well be burgeoning movements that have left ~you~ behind.

    11. Re:Running out of steam? by east+coast · · Score: 4

      While I'm receptive to what you're saying I have a certain issue with the same person who praises OSS and Google praising Apple and their known anti-competitive sentiment. Hell, we had yet another major story about it today.

      Also note, I never said "anti Google". There is a gulf of difference between being anti-something and not being pro-something. This kind of attitude brings me to say fanboism. Simply saying "I'd mod you down for being anti-Google" with no real consideration of the content screams fanboi to me. Are you seriously saying that Google doesn't fumble the ball? Are you saying that there aren't moves done by Google that don't leave you thinking "slippery slope"? To say otherwise is fanboism. There isn't a large entity that has made the front page of Slashdot that hasn't done something that's between lunkheaded to down right intentionally user unfriendly (to use a term).

      Sure, Google has brought lots of positive stuff to the table. So has everyone else for the most part. It doesn't mean that companies that I think are bringing something positive to the community are beyond reproach. That's just blind dogmatism and, frankly, it stinks.

      You may have a dim view of me after this post but that's simply the way I see it. No one and no company is 100% solid. The bias on Slashdot makes it very hard to bring the failings of these entities to light and for a supposed scientific community that's not only foolish but also dangerous.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    12. Re:Running out of steam? by gatzke · · Score: 2, Funny

      The pro-microsoft posts that get modded up are just done by MS astroturfers with mod points.

      I thought everyone knew that?

    13. Re:Running out of steam? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Can't expect much from someone with an slashdot id of nearly a million.

      Are we to expect more from someone without a UID? Or at least someone who can't be public about it?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    14. Re:Running out of steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he is.

    15. Re:Running out of steam? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will troll at thee, Sir.

      Maybe there needs to be a Slashdot for OLD nerds. ;^)

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    16. Re:Running out of steam? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, I agree with you. It's getting old that you can't post an honest opinion that isn't pro-OSS, pro-Google or pro-Apple without getting the beat down with the overrated mod.

      I'd like to offer an opposing view, then. I'm hardly in the Slashdot groupthink box: I consider (reasonable implementations of) copyright to be a viable, ethical system; I don't run Linux on my home PC (for all the same reasons other people don't); I think Microsoft does produce some good software (though far from all of it and I have no problem with saying that either)... You get the idea.

      I went through a phase a while back where it seemed like many of my non-groupthink-supporting posts were modded both (+1, Insightful) and (-1, Overrated), with the latter sometimes stacking up to hide a post because of the "two strikes and you lose your +1 bonus" rule even if it was also modded up multiple times.

      For the past few months, I've seen this much more rarely. I assume you still can't M2 a (-1, Overrated) mod; I've certainly never been offered one. So I can only conclude that modding down posts you disagree with is giving way to more reasoned discussion. At the same time, I have noticed a welcome increase in non-trivial, constructive responses to my posts, both agreeing and disagreeing with me, and those often lead to the interesting discussions I come here for. I, for one, say good riddance to our (-1, Overrated) modding, non-reply-posting underlords. :-)

      The only thing I have given up with for now is submitting stories. I'm sure there were good reasons all my recent submissions were rejected, and several of the topics made it via an alternative submission anyway, but it's just depressing to go to the effort of writing something up carefully and with checked links, only to see a day full of substandard press release jobs making it instead. This mainly predates the Firehose system, though, so perhaps it's better now. One of these days I might just find out.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    17. Re:Running out of steam? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree. I made a post which was (admittedly) antagonizing towards eBay security - but it was a far cry from the -2 Troll rating I received. I find the hyper-criticality of some people is really destructive.

      Rob - I have a great proposal to fix this.

      When you mod something down - both the post and the moderator's karma loose the point. I know this sounds bad - but I really think there needs to be something to dissuade the casual misuse of negative moderation. Something that enforces positive disagreement rather than retribution.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    18. Re:Running out of steam? by alllee · · Score: 1

      Many social institutions and social ecological systems utilize "costly sanctioning", which is just the idea that there is generally a cost involved in the real world to monitor and sanction behavior that falls outside of the norm. Whether it is the slice of income that we pay as taxes to fund police, or the time invested by neighbors that form a neighborhood watch, or the time invested by lobster fishermen to cut a rogue lobster fisherman's traps.

    19. Re:Running out of steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You weren't reading Slashdot back in 1998, like some of us were.

    20. Re:Running out of steam? by wilymage · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well my UID is prime.

      So narr.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. -- Albert Einstein
    21. Re:Running out of steam? by plover · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why you wouldn't submit interesting stories.

      the site has lost value
      ? This site has value because of interesting stories, where I define interesting as relevant, nerdy, and possibly controversial. I'm not saying just any old pro-Microsoft story would fly -- there are thousands of fanboi sites who would host it, and it's pretty much not on-topic for this forum -- but even M.S. can do something slashdottingly worthy once in a while.

      Please, submit them. It's not like you'd be spanked for it.

      Oh, and I have to agree with you about the trolls, too -- they injected a lot of humor, and certainly helped build the site to what it is today. I come back for the memes as much as anything. (Hot grits, anyone?) And the trolls certainly were never on the same par as casino or link spam. I always mentally considered them right on the edge of the discussion threshold, somewhere above the "Me too!"s and just below the people I disagreed with. But moderators have never really agreed with me anyway.

      And if you ever find a way back from never-mod-again land, please drop me a line! It's been five frakkin' years, Slashdot. Grow up.

      --
      John
    22. Re:Running out of steam? by rozz · · Score: 1

      The pro-microsoft posts that get modded up are just done by MS astroturfers with mod points.

      I thought everyone knew that? are you sure that was a Thought ?!?!
      cause it sounds a lot more like a conditional fanboi reflex ... you hear microsoft and you start barking harder than Pavlov's dog
      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
    23. Re:Running out of steam? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      This site has value because of interesting stories, where I define interesting as relevant, nerdy, and possibly controversial.

      No, this site had value because of being able to speak ones mind and not being modded down for it. That has changed and if the conversation can't be free and open than the submission is useless. Would you submit if you knew that people who wanted to have intelligent conversation about the subject at hand would be met with +5 Insightfuls that read "Balmer throws another chair" or "OMG Ponies!!!oneone!!!" while the truely insightful comments get modded down as troll or overrated and the replies are mostly "You god damn shill! This is nothing but astroturf!"

      It's my form of protest. Why feed the troll that's become slashdot?

      And if you ever find a way back from never-mod-again land, please drop me a line! It's been five frakkin' years, Slashdot. Grow up.

      Yeah, you know it burns my ass too. It's the kind of thing that common high school jocks would think is cool to do to another person. All the while people keep praising Taco for being "so wise" and shit like that. Really? If opposing voices aren't to be heard and respected here it can only show that the argument is weak on every level.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    24. Re:Running out of steam? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Maybe there needs to be a Slashdot for OLD nerds. ;^)

      Korea.slashdot.org ?

    25. Re:Running out of steam? by plover · · Score: 1

      It's my form of protest. Why feed the troll that's become slashdot?
      My view (different from yours, quite obviously) is that if I'm going to spend my time here, I'm going to participate fully. If I thought it was too troll-infested, republican-infested, democrat-infested, Microsoft-infested, SCO-infested, or even Apple-infested, then I'd quit reading. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of each, but none of these groups has risen to dominate discussion to the point of driving me away. It obviously has enough appeal to keep me coming back, so I figure it's worth my time to participate, and worth my money to subscribe.
      --
      John
    26. Re:Running out of steam? by deepian · · Score: 1

      I agree that the bias of Slashdot as an advantage: probably because it is in tune with my own bias... I am a recent convert to Slashdot - I was going to Techcrunch, Google News Sci/Tech, Profy, and other sites for tech news updates, until I discovered that I could find every story they covered that was of any interest to me, here on Slashdot - quicker, better covered, better comments, less noise. Now Slashdot ranks up there with Wikipedia and Google as my three most visited sites. Keep up the great work guys.

  8. the thing about ads ... by bwthomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... is this: I read adds on slashdot. For the very simple reason that i believe that, while you may be relatively ad agnostic (a good thing), the kinds of companies interested in advertising to a community like this are the kinds of companies that i just might be interested in. I'm much more likely to click on an ad on a slashdot page than i am on a google results page any day, and that's because the community that has been established around this site dictates a certain amount of honesty, legitimacy, and decorum that i do not see on other news sites, or websites.

    That is because of your editorial independence. So the day slashdot shills anything is the day slashdot dies. The corporatistas may not know it, but Rob Malda is the difference between the profitable business known as slashdot and no business at all.

    You may one day leave, and that's fine. Good even, new vision invigorates a company. Your most important task is to be instrumental in choosing who will succeed you. It's good enough feudalism, it's good enough for slashdot:)

    1. Re:the thing about ads ... by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      Does anyone even click on web ads?

      Granted. Ads need only name brand exposure for effect, and not necessarily direct contact clicking. Slashdot has a pretty good balance between visibility and actual article content I think.

      A better business model, imo, would be a peer base supported review system. We all use tech gadgets. We all have informed and experienced opinions. Much like a star ranking system, have a section dedicated to gadgets. Like newegg, we browse and we rank. Based on popularity, the cream rises to the top of our login screens (versus random targeted ads). It's win win. We are exposed to the latest products, have INFORMED and trusted peer reviews, and word of mouth is far more accurate and trusted than wholesale mass targeted advertisement bombing. Many gaps to fill in, including the potential for spam abuse. But you get the picture. Might just give CT an opportunity to say "yes" at the table next time.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:the thing about ads ... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      I always thought that they should just rent out the Slashdot effect. Pay the site x-amount of money, and then Slashdot posts a link to that site so you can stress test your system- when you're expecting it;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    3. Re:the thing about ads ... by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      I just inked a $500K+ managed hosting deal for my company. I first heard of the hosting provider via banner ad here on Slashdot years ago, and they have received a lot of positive feedback in many comment threads since then. After just two months with this hosting provider, I agree with everything I heard on slashdot: the support is unbelievably good, and their engineers are unbelievably competent.

      So yeah, I did a lot of other due diligence, and evaluated four other options. But in the end, the positive feedback from so many on slashdot broke the cost/benefit tie bewteen two very similar proposals.

      I think some advertisers understand this about slashdot's audience. Yes, there are a lot of pinko college kids and IT worker bees that would block or ignore ads. But the quality of the slashdot audience for a tech vendor is still very high. As the slashdot audience ages, a lot of those former pinko college kids and IT worker bees are in IT management, and are therefore in a position to make or at least strongly influence big-ticket buying decisions.

  9. Why not take your idea and roll with it? by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    here's constant pressure from within the company to create new "products". Sometimes these mean new/more/bigger ads which usually result in people installing junkbusters.


    You said they always want new ideas - how about slashvertisements?

    Not the usual lingo here - but an ad agency/division of /., designed behind the principle of making advertisements that are respectful to the viewer and not worth blocking or bypassing.

    - text, and maybe pictures
    - no or limited animation
    - no sound
    - no suggesting the the viewer is a moron (either in general or for not using the product)
    - require a maximum size that an ad cannot exceed
    - require any client put the ads in only a limited set of locations
    - Ad voting, similar to the comment karma system here.

    Advertising - done non-evil.
    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  10. Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    Yes friend, it wouldn't be the same without you.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  11. As another data point by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

    I'd like to point out that as of now, there are only 10 (+ this) comments at +2 or better, while we have crap-tons of comments on far-less relevant articles.

    10x more likely to bitch :-)

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  12. Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting to me that CmdrTaco sees 9/11 as one of Slashdot's greatest moments. Personally, I have mixed feeling. The fact that Slashdot stayed up indicated that Slashdot is run by some quality people but, more broadly, I see a tremendous failure of the media to keep 9/11 in perspective. This failure to maintain perspective has had profoundly negative consequences - most notably the US invasion of Iraq but also the USA's human rights abuses and reckless deficit spending.

    Back when Slashdot started there was all kinds of interest in computers and the power of technology and science to change the world for the better. Now, the focus is on conflict and war accompanied by a loss of basic human rights.

    The energy crisis (and associated problems - such as global warming) is real. But imagine that, instead of spending hundreds of billions a year on the mess that is Iraq, the USA instead spent hundreds of billions a year developing the science and technology to overcome these energy problems permanently rather than just prolonging the inevitable by fighting over the last reserves of oil. The USA put a man on the moon back in the days when most computations were performed by sliding two marked sticks together (slide rules).

    If there was the will, the USA could solve our energy problems permanently - but by failing to maintain perspective after 9/11 the USA has lost it's way. That's not to say that Slashdot was the one thing that caused the USA to lose it's way. Merely that Slashdot was powerless to prevent it.

    1. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 0

      Dear Anonymous Coward -

      1. Are you an American? If so, fine. If not, let me explain something to you. Watching thousands of people die in a terrorist attack is certainly horrifying whoever you are. But when it's your own country attacked, and your own countrymen dying, it's different in a way that would have been impossible for me to articulate before 9/11. You only really understand when it happens to you. I don't mean to sound patronizing about this -- I didn't understand it either, before 9/11. Very few Americans did. Of course, I knew all about Pearl Harbor, for example; but I suddenly realized how Americans of the time *felt* when they saw those newsreels and heard the radio broadcasts. That's our "perspective."

      2. There was no need to fight "over the last reserves of oil." Anyone with an elementary knowledge of economics can point out what laughable nonsense that is. The oil companies didn't want war, oil companies want *stability*. They make billions of dollars as it is -- war just throws a giant, unpredictable monkey wrench into things. The oil companies wanted to end the sanctions, and do business with Iraq. They didn't care that Saddam was an repressive dictator. Why would they? They cheerfully do business with dictatorships all the time.

      3. "If there was the will, the USA could solve our energy problems permanently." This is laughably naive. Let me try recasting it. ""If there was the will, the USA could cure cancer." "If there was the will, the USA could achieve world piece." "If there was the will, the USA could invent a way to turn lead into gold." Researchers around the country are exploring new energy sources, as they have been for decades. I am not saying they couldn't use more money. What I am saying is that it is not a slam dunk that throwing more money at them will suddenly result in more or better inventions. Inventions and discoveries don't always work that way.

          - Alaska Jack

    2. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that CmdrTaco sees 9/11 as one of Slashdot's greatest moments. Personally, I have mixed feeling.


      Sure, but in this post-Columbine world, what choice do we have?


      (If you don't get the reference, don't worry about it.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Dear Anonymous Coward -

      1. Are you an American? If so, fine. If not, let me explain something to you. Watching thousands of people die in a terrorist attack is certainly horrifying whoever you are. But when it's your own country attacked, and your own countrymen dying, it's different in a way that would have been impossible for me to articulate before 9/11. You only really understand when it happens to you. I don't mean to sound patronizing about this -- I didn't understand it either, before 9/11. Very few Americans did. Of course, I knew all about Pearl Harbor, for example; but I suddenly realized how Americans of the time *felt* when they saw those newsreels and heard the radio broadcasts. That's our "perspective."
      - Alaska Jack I don't know about the OP, but I'm British, and have lived through more terroist attacks on my countrymenthan I care to remember. We disn't proclaim "the world has changed forever" after each and every one. Indeed I'd argure that's the reason we eventually beat the IRA. The times we took over the top action it backfired; ask the provos what they thought of internment; they loved it.
      The key to defeating terrorism is not let yourself be terrorised, just go out and live your life as normal; otherwise the terrorists have already won, they've changed the way you live your life.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Mr.Bananas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The parent's post is a rambling tirade of unconnected concepts that have nothing to do with CmdrTaco's statement about Slashdot not crashing during the 9/11 attacks. I don't see why it got modded so highly...

      I believe what CmdrTaco's referring to is that he is proud of the technical achievement of having kept the site from crashing despite the incredibly high volume of traffic, and of running one of the few sites that still provided any useful information at the time. Many other conventional news web sites buckled under the intense traffic, while Slashdot still worked on that day.

      I agree that the U.S. government used 9/11 as an excuse to do some bad things later on, but during those attacks, most people here in the U.S. were mainly confused, scared, and panicked, largely due to the lack of information at the moment (I remember some people repeating farfetched rumors of nuclear attacks). I think CmdrTaco and his team should be very proud of this accomplishment because they overcame a huge technical challenge and provided an important public service at the moment.

    5. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      I understand your point of view, and greatly respect the way the British have dealt with IRA thugs and other assorted murderous loonies. In that context, let me make two points.

      1. If this list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_the_United_Kingdom is accurate, the most deaths from a single terrorist attack were 270 from the Lockerbie plane bombing. If you can remember back to that instance, you remember the consternation, chaos and grief that caused. Now, to put it in perspective, imagine 10 or 11 of those bombings happening at once in the skies over Britain. Oh, also, the two tallest buildings in London, which happen to be at or near the center of your economic infrastructure, are demolished.

      2. Relative to the U.S., residents of Great Britain are more able to "live [their lives] as normal" because Great Britain *already accepts* a greater level of government intrusion as "normal". In the U.S., we don't have videocameras everywhere (not yet, anyway). The question of whether or not the state has the ability to tell us we can't own firearm in our own homes is a matter of great debate, not a settled question. Etc. etc. etc.

      3. Finally, a related point: What you present as a fact -- i.e., the UK has gone about it's business as usual -- would be hotly disputed by many of your own countrymen. Articles like this http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,1759344,00.html and this http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article1129827.ece suggest that this is a matter of some dispute.

      This article http://www.espionageinfo.com/Ul-Vo/United-Kingdom-Counter-Terrorism-Policy.html also seems to dispute your contention. Excerpts: "Parliament ... responded to the rise of fundamentalist religious terrorist groups by passing the Anti-Terrorism, Crime, and Security Act in 2001, an action that was criticized by many civilrights groups ... After bombs exploded in two pubs in Birmingham ... Parliament passed the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act of 1974. The act allowed authorities to arrest suspected terrorists without a warrant and detain them for up to a week without filing charges against them. Suspected terrorists could also be deported from England to Northern Ireland. The policy of internment raised international criticism, as did the practice of "hooding," in which detainees would be isolated and forced to wear hoods over their heads. After an investigation by the European Commission of Human Rights in 1976, the practices of food and sleep deprivation, noise bombardment, forced standing at attention, and hooding were condemned by the body. Despite the commission's decision, the practices continued." etc.

      Not trying to start a flame war. I just think the situation's more nuanced than you describe.

          - Alaska Jack

    6. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      1. Are you an American? If so, fine. If not, let me explain something to you. Watching thousands of people die in a terrorist attack is certainly horrifying whoever you are. But when it's your own country attacked, and your own countrymen dying, it's different in a way that would have been impossible for me to articulate before 9/11. You only really understand when it happens to you. I don't mean to sound patronizing about this -- I didn't understand it either, before 9/11. Very few Americans did. Of course, I knew all about Pearl Harbor, for example; but I suddenly realized how Americans of the time *felt* when they saw those newsreels and heard the radio broadcasts. That's our "perspective." Actually, I am an American, and I was 16 (certainly old enough to understand what happened and its full impact) at the time of the 9/11 attacks. There was no emotional resonance for me whatsoever, and I think that people who did get all teary-eyed about it should probably try to keep things a bit more in perspective. Aside from the clumsy efforts our government has put forth as an answer to the attacks (or used the attacks as an excuse for, if you're of that mind), 9/11 has had no impact on me whatsoever. I think it was thoroughly overhyped by the media, and, in fact, all concerned. The fact that there was nothing on TV besides that coverage for a full 24, maybe 48 hours was nothing short of ridiculous.

      Maybe people will think I'm trolling, but that's honestly not my intent here. I really think that the so-called emotional impact of that event was due to people choosing to let it impact them, not because it had any real meaning in itself.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    7. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by SixFactor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't disagree with your post being modded Insightful, and yet I question the value of the insight. "Maintaining perspective" seems to be the theme of this insight. In the geopolitical parlance, the practical implementation of "maintaining perspective" would be the "proportional response," a concept developed in the 1960s, as low intensity conflicts replaced larger scale wars. The idea being, if say, the Syrians hit an Israeli destroyer with a Silkworm cruise missile, then the Israelis would sink a Syrian cruiser with their usual flair...like a covert operation involving divers and/or dolphins. Tit for tat.

      In the case of 9/11, we were faced with a truly stateless foe, and the proportional response concept could not be easily applied. Afghanistan, you say? Consider that even under the Taliban's shelter in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda was and is essentially a worldwide movement. Ejecting them from Afghanistan would have proven inadequate; other venues - Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, even Baathist Iraq - could have provided haven, easy or otherwise, for the movement.

      I submit that perspective has been maintained. Consider that leading up to 9/11, the dotcom implosion was still going strong, and on 9/12 the economy took a serious beating. And yet the nation did not fold. Why is that?

      Because the President did not order a cruise missile with a tactical nuclear warhead to every madrassa between Riyadh and Peshawar. Because he did not launch a Trident at Damascus. Because he did not turn Teheran into glass. Instead, he warned of the long and lonely slog ahead, but continued to encourage people to live their lives. Tough times? Here's a tax cut! A classic Keynesian move to spur a flagging economy. Certainly no one will dispute the existence of added constraints to travel, identification, and maintaining privacy. But now I ask you to "maintain perspective" by realizing that these are but minor inconveniences.

      The fact that you can continue to bitch about the President and not be incarcerated speaks volumes about the "loss of basic human rights" you alledge. I grew up in a Third World country run by a tin-pot dictator. I saw my first student riot in 1st grade, and wondered why the high school students were so mad - throwing rocks at an advancing wall of police shields. All our teacher could do was to have us duck down below the window sill so that we had a chance of not catching whiffs of tear gas (and other projectiles). I have had the fathers of classmates "disappear" for their views, and other fathers prosper - all because they had the right connections. Caught selling drugs? Meet the firing squad, baby. We don't need no stinkin' due process. Fight back? Well, it was not so easy, since said dictator confiscated privately owned firearms, including my grandfather's service revolver that saw him and his young family through an Axis occupation.

      So again, perhaps the most powerful man in the world - the man who can unleash Armageddon - has indeed demonstrated the strongest restraint, and maintained perspective. Perhaps it is you who needs to reconsider your own.

      --
      Science never settles, never rests.
    8. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's our "perspective."

      It's not clear if you are agreeing or disagreeing with the parent post. You seem to be saying that it is natural to have a biased perspective and the parent post seems to be saying that for the USA to have acted as an effective world leader it would have needed an unbiased perspective (or at least a deep understanding of other perspectives besides its own).

      "If there was the will, the USA could cure cancer."

      The USA does cure (some forms of) cancer (some of the time).

      An increase in funding for energy research will increase the rate at which new energy technology is discovered. The world need for energy also continues to increase. The key is to develop new energy technology at a rate that at least keeps pace with the increased world need for energy. The idea here would be to develop a permanent "surplus" of energy technology so that we permanently stay "ahead" of the world need for energy. Currently, we are in something of an energy "deficit" in that much of the developing world needs more energy that it receives (or is available) with current technology.

    9. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because the President did not order a cruise missile with a tactical nuclear warhead to every madrassa between Riyadh and Peshawar.

      When it comes to evaluating the US government's policies that resulted from 9/11, the relevant question is not "Could they have been worse?" but rather "Could they have been better?".

      I grew up in a Third World country run by a tin-pot dictator.

      Despite all the ugliness, I still believe in the USA. I firmly believe that the USA can be better than a third world country run by a tin-pot dictator - much better, in fact. But I also believe that, in order to be much better, the USA has to hold itself to a much higher standard.

    10. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      "An increase in funding for energy research will increase the rate at which new energy technology is discovered."

      Respectfully, this is pure conjecture. Take batteries, for example. Millions and millions have been invested trying to develop better batteries, but the technology has basically been stagnant for a long time. No great leaps in battery technology are on the horizon.

      One could also, I guess, make the argument that we already *have* better energy technology -- nuclear. We just don't use it, for assorted reasons.

      Again, I appreciate your respectful discussion. But I stand by my point that simply asserting "We could solve the world's energy problems -- all we need is to spend more money on it" doesn't make it so.

          - Alaska Jack

    11. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm not sure how to respond to this. You write: "I really think that the so-called emotional impact of that event was due to people choosing to let it impact them." Well, yes, just like any other event in life, from the birth of a child to the death of a loved one. No offense, but most people would suggest that it is normal to have an emotional reaction to the slaughter of 3,000 of your countrymen before your eyes.

      I sincerely don't want to sound flippant, but your response tracks closely with the affect (pardon the jargon) displayed by people on a too-high dose of Xanax or Zoloft. Nothing bothers them -- even things that *should* bother them.

          - Alaska Jack

    12. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      No offense taken, and I don't mean any offense when I say that the reaction to 9/11 was a complete overreaction. People die all the time, and as none of the people who died in this attack were personally connected to me, it means their deaths are no more meaningful than someone who died in an accident, or someone who died of peaceful old age. Is it good? Of course not. I don't want anyone to die... but I'm also not going to let the deaths of people who I had no idea even existed bother me, that would be completely senseless (if I did, how would I ever get through the day? I'd be constantly grieving over lost life).

      And I can assure you that I am on no medications whatsoever, even though some have suggested that I should be. ;)

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    13. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Sinical · · Score: 1

      Not to be the world's biggest asshat, but: how many hundred story buildings did they knock down? And not just knock down, but fly planeloads of *people* into? There is a difference between bombs that make you remove mailboxes from the street and freakin' airliners flying into the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Did all of the IRA's attacks together kill 3,000 people? Or even 100 people (I didn't follow world affairs as much back then)? There is a huge qualitative difference in these attacks, even though 3,000 deaths isn't a huge amount in the scheme of American deaths in a year.

    14. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by financialguy · · Score: 1
      Well said. I don't believe the poster is an American based on some of the phrasing, which doesn't invalidate his/her opinion out of hand, but at the same time, it does matter for the reasons you stated.

      In any case, the ironic thing is that this rant was almost completely off-topic and totally out of step with the thread, and yet got moderated to a +5. What makes this ironic is that this dopey moderation is happening in a thread about Slashdot. It's moderation like this that has made me avoid even bothering to read comments for topics that have even a remote chance of becoming political.

      What's sad about this is that there are so many smart people from so many points of view that read this site, and the kind of dialogue that could be had could be very interesting, enlightening, and perhaps even change someone's mind. But instead we get childish moderation that amounts to quasi-censorship of opinions not liked by the moderators, rather than modding up the best counter-argument to the disliked opinion. There's a reason that Taco suggests modding up is more virtuous than modding down, but unfortunately that seems lost on the majority of moderators/metamoderators.

      Oh well. The Slashdot community is what it is, and I keep coming back if for no other reason than the breadth and quality of the stories, and on occasion, the really insightful comments on non-political issues.

    15. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by cgori · · Score: 1

      In the "modern" era of the Provisional IRA about ~1800 people have been killed, not including ~300 IRA members themselves killed in the conflict. About half of the 1800 were military or paramilitary personnel. Another ~6000 military/paramilitary were injured, and ~14000 (fourteen thousand) civilians were injured over the ~40 year period. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_campaign_1969-1997 )

      I'm a US citizen and yes, 9/11 was a horrible, awful tragedy that I will remember for the rest of my life, but I believe that we belittle the tragedies and conflicts that other nations have lived through in the way we treat the events of that day as being the most awful tragedy ever to occur.

      I believe that roughly ten times as many people die in car accidents on US roads each year than died on 9/11, for example. (NHTSA reports numbers between 36k and 39k per year in the last decade)

    16. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Well said yourself. As you may have noticed, some numbskull has already seen my original post, thought "Hmm, I don't agree with that," and modded me down.

      I've actually thought that /. would be better if you *couldn't* mod down ... only up. Eventually, all the good stuff would bubble up to the topanyway, right? And if you didn't like what you read, your only recourse would be to ignore it. What am I missing? Why wouldn't that be a better system?

            - AJ

      PS Another thought -- maybe /. should just go ahead and implement an "I don't agree with this, but I lack the intellectual firepower to argue with it" mod.

    17. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Good points, and frankly I can't believe that everyone is being so civil, buried down here in the /. murk. But let me make a few points:

      1. The fatality statistics you cite bolster MY point, not the original posters. When I read your post, I thought "Wait -- 900 civilian deaths? That's all?" Given the protracted period we are talking about, I thought it was a lot higher. And as the GP stated, there is simply a huge qualitative difference between a long-term war of attrition and a massive attack causing the deaths of 3,000 men, women and children.

      2. I'm not belittling anything or anyone. Also, I think you are resorting to a sort of hyperbole -- i.e., "we treat the events of that day as being the most awful tragedy ever to occur" -- because you have a weak point here. I don't know a single person who would describe 9/11 that way. The world sees terrible tragedies every day. But there's a difference between, say, a natural disaster and a carefully planned, murderous attack on innocent civilians.

      3. That kind of leads in to my last point. You write: "I believe that roughly ten times as many people die in car accidents on US roads each year than died on 9/11, for example." I hear that all the time. But it's ludicrously besides the point. When Japanese forces attacked Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt didn't appear before Congress and say "Well, yes, the attack was terrible. But let's not overreact. 10 times as many people die in car accidents every year. Let's tighten up highway safety standards, implement some tough drunk-driver laws, and start requiring seatbelts in all our cars. Once that is accomplished -- and of course after we address heart disease, unsafe working conditions and all the other leading causes of fatalities -- we will get around to addressing Pearl Harbor."

          - Alaska Jack

    18. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by financialguy · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting idea (not allowing for downward mods). It would not allow for modding down stupid things like "first post" posts, but then again something like that would never be modded up to begin with, so on a relative basis you wouldn't ever see it. I suppose the other downside to this idea would be for people who regularly read comments at lower levels, and had to contend with more flamebait/troll type of posts. But then again we're back to who's making the call on those issues, and it seems that all too often it's moderators who have a strong opinion in one direction or another so they mod on the basis of that opinion rather than the merits of a given post.

      In any case I'd love to see this implemented on an experimental basis. I have to believe that the best stuff would float to the surface like you said, and that would include posts on any side of a debate. I'm sure there'd be a rebellion amongst many, but I suppose a guy can dream.

      By the way, I like your idea of a "...lack of intellectual firepower..." mod. Maybe it could be released at the same time with a "I'm too lazy or too childish to mod up a good opposing argument" mod.

    19. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whilst I agree entirely that one of the crucial ingredients to a successful anti-terrorist campaign (and one of the crucial mistakes in the US response to 9/11, IMHO) is to keep clear in your mind that they are just common criminals and should be treated as such by the legal system, and that it's vital to NOT let the buggers destroy one's normal life, the fact remains that 9/11 was undeniably the largest single terrorist attack (in terms of the number of victims) in recent history. If the IRA had killed 2750 people in one of the London bombings, I suspect we Brits may have reacted slightly less phlegmatically than usual.

      Also please note that although we were getting pretty blase about it at the end of the thirty years of the most recent Troubles, that was largely the result of a deliberate change in strategy by the IRA to concentrate on economic damage (the City, Docklands and Manchester campaigns in particular), rather than mass civilian casualties. Even the RA eventually realised that pictures of grieving parents burying their 5 year old children made for bad PR when it came to getting money from NORAID and similar financial supporters. No such concerns affect Al Qaeda, and it seems clear that they're still in the simple-minded "lots of dead civilians will lead to our victory" stage of their, uh, "struggle". In the early days, particularly in the 1971-75 era when there were sustained attacks on civilian targets, there was enormous public pressure for drastic action. We did in fact use internment (aka "imprisonment without trial of anyone suspected to be a sympathiser") for a few years before it dawned on the powers that be that this was actually counter-productive.

      Disclaimer -- I spent three years in Ulster during the Troubles, and incidentally met some of the nicest people I've ever encountered over there. I keep meaning to go back some time. however "normal life" was /significantly/ affected compared even to "mainland" Britain. I got used to watching your accent when talking in public, wearing my hair at an unambiguously unmilitary length, watching the colour of the kerbstones & the "FTP" / "FTQ" graffiti in a new area, displaying your driving license propped behind your windscreen, getting questioned and searched by bored 18 y.o. squaddies, police statins being mini-fortresses with anti-mortar and blast screens, etc. And of course people known to be targets had to take routine anti-surveillance measures, varying their route home, proper physical security of the house, not parking on public streets (or outdoors at all, if possible), and so on. They adapted and carried on, but their lives were certainly affected.

    20. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      3. Finally, a related point: What you present as a fact -- i.e., the UK has gone about it's business as usual -- would be hotly disputed by many of your own countrymen. Articles like this http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,1759344,00.html and this http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article1129827.ece suggest that this is a matter of some dispute.

      This article http://www.espionageinfo.com/Ul-Vo/United-Kingdom-Counter-Terrorism-Policy.html also seems to dispute your contention. Excerpts: "Parliament ... responded to the rise of fundamentalist religious terrorist groups by passing the Anti-Terrorism, Crime, and Security Act in 2001, an action that was criticized by many civilrights groups ... After bombs exploded in two pubs in Birmingham ... Parliament passed the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act of 1974. The act allowed authorities to arrest suspected terrorists without a warrant and detain them for up to a week without filing charges against them. Suspected terrorists could also be deported from England to Northern Ireland. The policy of internment raised international criticism, as did the practice of "hooding," in which detainees would be isolated and forced to wear hoods over their heads. After an investigation by the European Commission of Human Rights in 1976, the practices of food and sleep deprivation, noise bombardment, forced standing at attention, and hooding were condemned by the body. Despite the commission's decision, the practices continued." etc.

      Not trying to start a flame war. I just think the situation's more nuanced than you describe.

      - Alaska Jack Yes, I agree, the situation is more nuanced, but I was trying to outline general principles pre-2001. Not take a detailed view of the current state of UK terrorism laws (I'm sorry if I was unclear). I agree that our *current* (i.e. post 2001)anti-terror policies are wrong, but that's because we've forgotten our history. I believe we should have carried our anti-IRA terrorism policies over into out anti-Al Quiada ones, as an example we tried internment against the IRA, we abandoned it when we realised that it was just causing more people to join the IRA. Against Al-Quaida we're using "control orders" that can basically put anyone under house arrest on the suspicion of the police; if that's not just interning people within their own houses I don't know what is.
      The interesting thing is we have had this and other restrictions on our liberty because the politicians cry: "everything changed on 9\11". However if you ask the ordinary person on the street, everything didn't change, but still they have no problems with new draconian laws because most don't know about them and the ones that do take the view that the laws are aimed at terrorists and they're not terrorists...
      My solution to the problem of the UKs anti-terror laws would be to allow phone-tap and other intercept evidence in court (we currently don't), allow post-charge questioning* (with judicial supervision) repeal control orders, kill the ID cards before they're made compulsory and make use of Diplock courts.

      *Currently the government wants to give the police the ability to hold people without charge for upto 90 days, extended from the already draconian 28 days enshrined in recent anti-terror legislation.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    21. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      My problem is that we're making the same mistakes again, what are control orders and 90 days detention without trial if not internment?
      Instead what we should be doing is allowing intercept evidence in courts and perhaps using Diplock style courts for the most dangerous suspects at worst. Yet instead we seem to just get more and more rhetoric and ever more draconian laws from our politicians.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    22. Re:Slashdot's greatest moment: 9/11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded about the tech. achievement. /. is how I found out just what was going on, as I knew "something" had happened, and well, what other site would I go to?

      Then, after seeing the grim news, I tried to go elsewhere, and couldn't find anything. I kept my colleagues well informed by refreshing /., when everything else was down.

  13. Taco: A question about user interface by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    CmrTaco: I'm not a computer guy -- though I do learn a lot by reading /. -- so bear with me if this is a stupid question. What I've taken away from CSS Garden is that, through CSS, you can provide drastically different interfaces with the same content. Why couldn't Slashdot do something like that? Provide users with different ways of viewing the forums?

    To be, by FAR the best forum interface ever is provided by Google Groups (in the "Tree View" mode). It's the only forum presentation I've ever seen that provides intuitive navigation from a left-hand pane, letting you see immediately where you are in the "tree". It is so superior, I am baffled as to why it hasn't been widely emulated. Other forums make you constantly go up to the top of the screen to see the hierarchy, which is obviously useless.

    Where I'm going with this: I wonder if you'd ever consider approaching Google and asking them to share that code with you. I bet they'd do it -- it seems like a good, high-profile PR move for them. And what a huge boon for users. Man, Slashdot with a navigable left-pane hierarchy -- that would be a dream come true.

          - Alaska Jack

    1. Re:Taco: A question about user interface by Night+Goat · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I've taken away from CSS Garden is that, through CSS, you can provide drastically different interfaces with the same content. Why couldn't Slashdot do something like that? Provide users with different ways of viewing the forums?

      Alaska Jack, one thing that you might not be aware of with CSS is that it's possible to write your own CSS style sheets and make your web browser use them instead of the one that the website designer has created. Slashdotters who are so inclined could make their own version of Slashdot's CSS file and make their web browser load that instead. If you want to do this, try downloading core-tidied.css and try editing some of the features on it. Then make your web browser load it, and see how you can change the layout. Hope this is helpful for you.
    2. Re:Taco: A question about user interface by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, maybe you missed the part where I said I'm not a computer guy :^)

      Seriously, I sincerely appreciate your taking the time to make the the suggestion. But to me, the page you linked to looks about the same as a what you'd get from the proverbial monkey banging on a keyboard. I might be able to change the color of an element, but I highly doubt I'd be able to create anything as sophisticated as a completely new layout.

      I am good at some things. Computers aren't one of them. :^(

            - AJ

    3. Re:Taco: A question about user interface by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Heh, no, I read that part, but I thought I would throw the suggestion out there anyway. As crazy as it sounds, if you hadn't said you weren't a computer guy, I would have assumed you already knew about custom CSS sheets!

  14. Thanks Rob for all the years by C.+Alan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The editorial independence of slashdot, and the meta moderating has keep me coming back here for years. I am glad you have been able to resist the coporate culture as long as you have, and maintain a quality site.

    Back a couple of years ago, I was giving a presentation to a bunch of high school seniors on careers in engineering. I asked if any wanted to be CS majors. A few timidly raised their hands. I then asked if any of them had hear of slashdot.org. None of them had. I told them point blank that if they wanted to get anywhere in CS, they had better start reading slashdot.

    Good luck on the next 10 years!
    --C. Alan

  15. Thank You & Here's to the next 10 years by Ma_Belle · · Score: 1

    While I have only been reading this website for the past 7-8 months, I must say that I have great respect for the vision of Slashdot. As my 1st post, I have learned more here than I had hoped. However I stumbled upon this place, this is the 1st page that opens every day. The intellectual insights of the users, as well as the general content will keep me coming back for the next 10 years and more.

  16. Hear, hear! by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    I agree.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  17. Thank you -thread by PKJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you, slashdot.org, for your existance! :)

  18. Obligatory by Etrias · · Score: 1

    This is the end of Slashdot!

    Nah, thanks for the catharsis you insensitive clod!

    Do I get modded down for squeezing in two cliches? Yeah? Crud.

  19. Slashdot Drama 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot Drama 2008
    - CowboyNeal will finally have sex with CmdrTaco whose wife gets a divorce; CowboyNeal and CmdrTaco will move to a new apartment, together
    - kdawson gets promoted to upper management for his consistently excellent news delivery
    - RMS, ESR, Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer settle all their arguments and celebrate the merge of major software license platforms by engaging in a massive man train of over 13,000 Coders for Cock (a Guinness World Record!)
    - Theo de Raadt commits a suicide after OpenBSD's tight security got penetrated with a huge NIGGER penis
    - Linux finally dies, FreeBSD gets hijacked by Singaporean homo-mulatto pirates from San Fransisco
    - goatse.cx goes back online!

  20. Thanks for everything by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    It's been great so far. See you in another 10.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  21. The attention getters by elevtro · · Score: 1

    You mention boobs. Flashy highly admirable boobs do grab the guy's attention.
    Even in my RC Heli magazine they use boobs. I like them of course because it is a dream that hot chicks like that are in to RC toys and geeks. But the reality is that they are just paid boob whores to get more revenue.
    Having said that, if you threw in a few boobs, other than the average readers, I would certainly pay attention to them. I might miss some of the stories though because I would be fixated on the boobs.
    But, a thought is that you could customize the body parts seen depending on the user's claimed gender like the MySpace ads. My wife gets ads with guys on them, and I get ads with girls on them.
    Why not have stories that when I'm logged in, can see a boob next to borg bill. That would make Bill look a lot better for sure. =)
    If you build it they will come! I think that was in some movie or something. We're here to stay now that you've built it though. Keep it real for the next 10 and all will be well. Ben

    1. Re:The attention getters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you build it they will come!

      I think I found a typo in your post.

  22. My prediction for /. 10 years from now... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    We'll finally be rid of the .gif images on the site. :-)

    Hopefully to be replaced with scalable SVGs. Hey, I can dream, right?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:My prediction for /. 10 years from now... by logixoul · · Score: 1

      Huh? What's wrong with the gifs?

  23. Against the grain by athloi · · Score: 1

    Or take Columbine. When this tragedy hit, our readers took it a differently. Instead of blaming video games, we looked hard at the culture of abuse that drives high school. We talked about how the jocks beat us up. We knew that the terrible events of that day are almost inevitable when you stick kids into a system where certain groups of kids are given free reign to beat up others based on extra curricular activities.

    This is what I like about Slashdot. A focus on technology and a view that solutions are not necessarily what everyone else on all sides of the political spectrum seems to think they are.

    When I see people imbibing the kool-aid of Macintosh, Linux, Libertarianism or any of a dozen other -isms or fanboy silos, I sense the creeping death that threatens any organization: groupthink. Moo.

    It's to your credit that you've kept it at bay. Ten more years, at least, and keep it hairy here so if the corporates want to intervene, they'll get F1R5T P05T and goatse in their laps.

    1. Re:Against the grain by mrv20 · · Score: 1

      Despite it seeming to be in vogue to rail against a perceived groupthink in the discussions, one of the reasons I enjoy reading slashdot is that it never goes unchallenged. There is *always* someone pointing out the fallacies in the arguments that are based more on loyalty than logic.

      Keep up the good work, and the scepticism :)

      --
      "Algebraical symbols are used when you don't know what you are talking about" - BCS
  24. Bring Back Geeks In Space! by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never posted this request before since I thought that the crew was split apart but since you're all in Ann Arbor, bring back Geeks in Space!

    I used to have a ball at listening to CowboyNeal, Hemos and CmdrTaco chatting about what was happening online and whatever else happened to come up. I still remember CmdrTaco bitching about how lossy MP3 compression was and since then I've used his cymbal noise as an example of why FLAC is better.

    Call it a podcast, I don't care! Since the quickies are dead (and I miss them too), I wanna hear what you guys think about the latest South Park episode, how your female WoW characters are doing and other nerdy, nerdy, silly stuff.

    Anyway, throw us an audio bone and bring back Geeks in Space, please!

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
  25. Cowboy Neal by wizkid · · Score: 1


    The good thing is that the CowBoy Neal jokes can't get any worse in 10 years. So that's one part of /. that can't get worse, and won't be sold out to corporate look interests.

    --
    I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  26. Error-Free by sjwoo · · Score: 1

    And not a single grammatical or typographical error (at least none glaring) in TFA. Bravo!

    1. Re:Error-Free by Samus · · Score: 1

      Almost Jeff spends way too much time in conference calls with corporate offices

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
  27. Re:DIGG by djdavetrouble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember for while when digg became popular, people would often complain that they had seen it on digg yesterday.
    I decided to give digg a try, but found that so much crap got through as well that I was wading around trying to find the
    "good stuff". Also, the comments are about on par with a pre teen message board, and headlines frequently look like a 9 year old wrote them.

    This kept me on slashdot, where the worst that I have to endure is old jokes (that still make me laugh when executed correctly).
    Most trolls get modded down pretty quickly, and I have actually end up learning something most of the time.

    I still check digg every now and then, and the new fad is for a single (AWESOME!) picture to get dugg up.

    I had an interesting IT experience about a year back, and said to myself, "self, I bet you could make the front page of digg with this".

    So, as an experiment, I created a blogger blog and submitted it to digg. Lo and behold a few short hours later this non news story, personal
    blog had hit the front page of digg. I enabled adsense and made about $20.00 from the thing. Its just not a news site anymore, and easily gamed.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  28. Ten years is a long time, hope to see you in 2017! by bushboy · · Score: 1

    I can't recall when I first read Slashdot, but as my nick here is the first online nick I had (subsequently changed, for obvious reasons), I figure it would be around late '98.

    The net back then was a very different beast, but what is so great to see is that Slashdot has matured with *cough* some dignity and grace. What makes it good now is what made it good 10 years ago.

    I've had my private rants at Slashdot, permanently removing it from my bookmarks on a few occassions - I can never really recall what makes me do this, possibly really bad news days or too many 'repeat' stories, or possibly too much booze.
    Funny thing is, I always come back.

    Perhaps it's because I have good Karma... (or no social life?)

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  29. I'm in touch with my inner astroturf too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean please.

    1. Re:I'm in touch with my inner astroturf too! by nbvb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ooh, sorry, I forgot the obligatory "I'm just a happy customer" comment. Really. I have no relationship with Ironport whatsoever besides being a happy customer.

      I guess that any positive comments instantly become astroturfing? Believe me, or don't. It doesn't matter to me. I just wanted to share a story about how something most people see as negative can be a positive.

  30. Respect the posters!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And an angry user is 10 fold more likely to post than a happy one. I have too posted when I wasn't angry...once. You should think before you say things like that, you insensitive clod!!

    Posting anonymously so that you can't tell if I've ever actually posted anything nice...ever
  31. Wait unitl your baby has his own Slashdot account. by sphealey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > proposed to my wife here... and she accepted
    > and now years later we have a baby.

    Wait until your baby creates his/her own Slashdot account - mine did this year. That made me feel both proud and old...

    sPh

    Of course you may have reserved userid 10 for that purpose a long time ago...

  32. Re:Wait unitl your baby has his own Slashdot accou by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    Damn, my first one's on the way and You just made me feel old thinking about seeing him (I hope it's a boy) browsing /. and hacking away.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  33. So when do you get IPv6? by anticypher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only halfway kidding on that. At a recent conference on IPv4 address exhaustion, /. got called out by name when the main speaker said that IPv6 wouldn't take off until Slashdot supported it.

    I had started to write a question for the "Ask Rob" story, but ended up wandering off before hitting submit. In short, it was a question on future technologies, and whether there was any youthful geekiness left in the /. crowd.

    But then, there was Rob's excellent response to similar question.

    "I think the single biggest threat to Slashdot is for us to try to be something we're not."

    Which is why slashdot still has legions of followers after 10 years. The moderation systems, the layout, the filtering systems are quite good for what slashdot is. The addition of RSS feeds, CSS, and the few other improvements over a decade shows that slashdot grows as necessary, too much too fast would only hurt.

    That being said, there is a part of me that wonders if adding some AJAX navigation or publishing an API so people doing mashups can make a /.++, would hurt much. Certainly, IPv6 would add some tech cred without any damage. A working API like google maps or facebook have might be interesting just to see what new ideas are floating around.

    Rob, do you even have time to play with new technologies like AJAX, or look at what other places are doing with their APIs and mashups? Do you get out to conferences or trade shows (I know, with a new baby, probably not much)?

    I'm not really asking for slashdot2.0, the newest paradigm for a social mashup avatar-driven search engine portal, because I probably would never use (or be able to use) it.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:So when do you get IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The thing with Slashdot and AJAX navigation is this. I have access to various computers. When at Home (WinXP, Firefox) I see various AJAX functionality in Slashdot (side-widget, comments open in place). If i try IE, i see no AJAX functionality. At work (Ubuntu + Firefox) i also see no AJAX functionality.

      I cleaned my cookies in all the browsers but nothing changes. Only with WinXP + Firefox at home i see all this AJAX things.

      Do anybody know what is going on? Have Slashdot enabled AJAX but only with WinXP + Firefox?

    2. Re:So when do you get IPv6? by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Can't help but reply. I find it hilarious that you are requesting IPv6 support, with an advertised website in IPv4 space. I understand that http://:1/index.html would be far less subtle, but still...

    3. Re:So when do you get IPv6? by ptudor · · Score: 1

      IPv6 wouldn't take off until Slashdot supported it. Yes, v6 please Taco. With ARIN handing out /48s to everyone now...
  34. Fun workin' with yahs! by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 3, Informative

    I enjoyed my years working behind the scenes on Andover/OSDN/VA's network admin and much of that because Rob and Jeff were fun to work with. For example there was LinuxWorld in NYC, when we drank a few too many Gin & Midori concoctions to the point where [name withheld] couldn't remember his hotel room, or what floor it was on, or even coherently explain where the jacket he was wearing came from.
    Good times.

    BTW: The fish restaurant in Boston mentioned in history of Slashdot part 3 was Anthony's Pier 4, a good place in its day but Boston has better nowadays.

  35. The most painful moment by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not sure that this was mentioned, but in my opinion the most painful moment in Slashdots history (at least as far as I was reading) was when the Scientology(R) church managed to get a post actually deleted.

    You could really feel the pain oozing through the /. crew being forced to do something, which goes so much against the grain and the spirit of this board. Nevertheless I think it was the right decision since this would have been a fight with no way to win.

    However, and to stay in Scientology(R) slang, the whole sordid affair was a big win for Slashdot. As usual: the good Scieno(R) burgers created so much rotten publicity and once again so many folks, who didn't give a shit in the first place, learned about the sinister methods of this "applied religious philosophy".

    And all for the price of pulling a piece of bad science fiction. Science fiction for which some less enlightened members of our species pay 300'000 or so bucks to read at that. But then again you can find it on a lot of other places on the net for completely free.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  36. posting boobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could gain traffic by posting boobs or covering other subjects, but that would distract us from our real focus. And it would drive you guys away.


    Yes, instead we post goatse to keep us in focus!

    1. Re:posting boobs... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      What we need now is the story of "10 years of Goats.Cx".

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  37. The "Intel" section by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Far worse is the occasional attempt to create some sort of content partnership that blurs the lines between legitimate Slashdot content, and the paying advertiser's message.
    Rob and colleagues, if you're reading this: the above quote reminds me of the Intel section that's now gone. Actually I think it's a shame. I really liked the section. I checked it every so often and liked the idea that I could talk straight with the engineers and other people of the business.

    If it was up to me, the section was re-established. Perhaps periodically with another sponsor or so.
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:The "Intel" section by LuckyStarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it was up to me, the section was re-established. Perhaps periodically with another sponsor or so.
      Did you mean something like:

      The evil-corporate-overlord-of-the-week is: [insert company name here]. Please post your questions.

      Actually, that could be interesting.
      --
      Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
    2. Re:The "Intel" section by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If Intel wants to advertize, let them buy an ad on slashdot that links to their own site where they can feel free to install slash and discuss whatever product they want. It is important to not only maintain editorial independence but also the appearance of editorial independence.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    3. Re:The "Intel" section by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      but also the appearance of editorial independence
      For me, it was pretty clear that the content was sponsored. It was in a separate section, and the link had a header "Sponsors". Of course, you could have other objections, such that it "influences the feeling" of slashdot, however it's hard to be confused about appearance.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:The "Intel" section by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      *laughs*

      That could indeed be interesting, if by:
      'that'
      you mean:
      'the shredding of the PR image of $CORP_OVERLORD by the blood craving masses of slashdot'

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  38. Ditto - thanks by scottm · · Score: 1

    Thanks Rob & the entire slashdot crew. I've been around, mostly lurking, since long before user accounts. Professionally, I've "grown up" with slashdot, and it's shaped a lot of my career, solved a lot of problems, and of course provided a dependable distraction. Other sites have come and gone (and as you allude to, some probably have staying power and many probably have features worth "stealing from"), but at the end of the day I'll keep refreshing /.

    1. Re:Ditto - thanks by cjpa · · Score: 1

      exactly my thought. how's that for group-think :D

  39. Re:Cowboy Neal jokes? by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Funny

    The great refreshing taste of Pepsi. The preferred Cola of 1 out of 1 CowBoy Neals!

  40. The biggest threat to slashdot? by uofitorn · · Score: 1

    This place's slow descent into being kdawson's personal blog. That wasn't a joke.

    --
    "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
    "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
  41. All these years by kekePower · · Score: 1

    I remember one day way back then when I no longer could find Dips & Chips and was redirected to a new site called Slashdot. I also remember telling all my coworkers about D&C because we were all Linux guys and this site provided us with all sorts of interesting news on the subject.

    I really can't believe I've been here for 10 years, day in and day out... I've become addicted to the Slashdot news. I even check the site on my mobile when I'm away from a computer for more than a day. I have to...

    Thank you Rob and your team. You've all given me so much. I can't tell how much you're appreciated.

    Yours truly,
    kekePower
  42. from a seed to a tree by sylverboss · · Score: 1

    it's amazing how Internet can change each other lives.. slashdot story is very inspirational !

  43. Thanks for the 10 Years by plieb · · Score: 1

    I'm one of those people who have never submitted a story, rarely post, but never let a day go by without checking the stories on Slashdot. So thanks and keep it up.

    Paul

    1. Re:Thanks for the 10 Years by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      I am also paul, but I do post more than on occasion, less than daily.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  44. Re:DIGG by EMeta · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You say your story supports the idea that Digg is easily gamed, and I have to disagree. (Not that I'm disagreeing that Digg can easily be gamed, just that's not what you did.) You found something that you thought would be interesting to Digg's patrons. You submitted it in an appropriate context (even a new blog can be worth reading--and often more so: the writer still has new ideas).

    Lots of other people also found it interesting. I don't know the numbers, but I guess that means a thousands of people found something that gave them at least a marginal amount of entertainment. You effectively received a few cents from each of them for the service.

    I think this is exactly how Digg and sites like it are supposed to work. Certainly they can't be free--bandwidth is still too expensive for that. You, the content provider just got a cut. If you were to find more interesting IT stories you could do this more, and everyone in the process would gain from it again.

  45. How about spreading the slashdot approach? by DescData · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the the good work. I've enjoy this site since about 2000.

    One thing, have you thought about spreading the slashdot approach to forums? All is see is blogs. In my opinion more users moderated forums would be a very good thing.

    Thanks,

  46. They don't think that way by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    To their way of thinking, you are a fossil living in the past. You think that what is must remain. They think how to grab new consumers today, and if they think they can get twice as many adclicks by trading in all the old customers for new consumers, their cold blooded short term calculations will lead them that way.

    History is bunk, they say.

  47. geeks in space by nocomment · · Score: 1

    If 'the band' is back together, where's my 'geeks in space'?

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  48. God! This place has SO jumped the shark... by Chas · · Score: 1

    =)

    Just kidding!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  49. Ah Slashdot... how we love/hate thee so by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been reading and posting to Slashdot since at least 2001. I've posted 1,376 comments during those years. Slashdot mods have both lauded my postings and bitch-slapped them for complaining about the "rules" on Slashdot, ranting on Creationism vs. Evolution, the MS vs. Linux debate, and probably hundreds of other somewhat random topics. Sep. 11, 2001 was particularly memorable as this is where I too first learned about the awful events of that day. But it's also funny that this is the one site, that despite all the other newer and shinier sites out there (Digg) that come along from time to time, keeps me coming back for more. There IS discussion on this site, not just adolescent e-penis boasting like you find on sites like Kuroshin or Digg. Why? Because this site found its nitch early on, and never strayed. I have found over these past 6 years, that all of my favorite brick-and-mortar entities, be they church, shopping, or entertainment, also do the same: they cater to exactly their nitch and never stray from it. So keep up the hard work, gang, and don't stray!

    BTW, corporate entities: many if not all of my favorite technology things that I have bought over the years were in one way or another promoted by others on Slashdot at some point in time, I looked into their recommendations, and decided to buy the technology for myself. By no means does this mean that I WANT comment spam from corporate shills - I most certainly will see such fraudulent shilling and resent all the more your product... but if you produce a good product and your customers appreciate your efforts enough to mention the product on Slashdot, WITHOUT compensation for doing so, then you're doing the RIGHT THINGS and should keep it up! A short list of things I've used based on customer recommendations on Slashdot:

    Godaddy
    Fastmail
    nVidia graphics cards
    Linux - Mandrake first, and now Ubuntu (love it!)
    O'Reilly books
    Edward R. Tufte's books
    Firefox
    iPods
    and a host of other stuff that I've recommended to friends and family as well

  50. Rob, after reading your last segment I was going to shoot you over an email thanking you for all of your and your team's hard work and character.
    But I was sidetracked...

    I have been reading Slashdot since 1997 and I have been a student, lumber yard worker, bookseller, father, IT engineer, NOC Director and for the last
    three years an owner and engineer for my own IT Services company. I have read the site just about every day and it is just a kick ass amalgam of all of
    the kind of stuff that I hold dear to my heart.

    (I regretfully lost my original account and then I didn't bother trying to login for a few years (yes I'm a lurker) if you can find a badmotor@ix.netcom.com email
    addy/account in the way way back machine, I would gladly swap it ;-)

    You guys have been critical in turning me on to new ideas that have paid real dividends (heart, mind and money). So keep on keeping on and know that I
    deeply appreciate what you have done over the last ten years. I think the Rudyard Kipling poem, If, is fitting when it comes to walking the razor's edge
    between your heart and the corporate abyss:

    If you can keep your head when all about you
    Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
    If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you
    But make allowance for their doubting too,
    If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
    Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
    Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
    And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

    If you can dream--and not make dreams your master,
    If you can think--and not make thoughts your aim;
    If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
    And treat those two impostors just the same;
    If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
    Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
    And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:

    If you can make one heap of all your winnings
    And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
    And lose, and start again at your beginnings
    And never breath a word about your loss;
    If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
    To serve your turn long after they are gone,
    And so hold on when there is nothing in you
    Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

    If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
    Or walk with kings--nor lose the common touch,
    If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
    If all men count with you, but none too much,
    If you can fill the unforgiving minute
    With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
    Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
    And--which is more--you'll be a Man, my son!

    --Rudyard Kipling

    Thanks!
    Colin

  51. Thank you Slashdot by CrazyP · · Score: 1

    I never thought I would become a geek, in high school I could use a computer, had decent knowledge, but had no clue about coding and the such. Then I moved to Hawaii to get a business degree in 1998. Though, with having my own laptop I quickly learned about irc, mp3s, and *nix in mid to late 1999. This is also when I found out about slashdot from friends. I remember the days of trying to install linux and not having much luck, and then finally getting slackware successfully installed for the first time was a major accomplishment! This is about when I then realized I needed to change majors and I switched to Computer Science... I must thank slashdot for this, as it helped me realize my true calling in life, to be a geek! Slashdot helped the inner geek in me come out, so thank you again.

    --
    How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
    1. Re:Thank you Slashdot by vonkug · · Score: 1

      As a member of the just-fledging geeks of the new generation- I have to say Slashdot is one place that epitomizes the internet, and what it should be. The free exchange of information, but a fair-minded, topically indiscriminate filtering by the mods (who deserve their own particular praise for the preservation of the community) keeping integrity and sanity afloat in an otherwise grossly populous and frontier-ish internet community. There is always some lawlessness, but when the average page-view comes around, 90% of the shenanigans are excluded, and the viewer sees a large volume of information and opinion on the relevant discussion topic. I recently showed my father (50 years old, high school teacher) Slashdot, and he sat down and read. And read. And I came back 40 minutes later, and his only words were: "Wow, this is so COOL!" Thanks for making Slashdot the accessible, clean, and informative site we all love, with integrity that the whole internet should (and does?) envy.

      --
      I do not fear computers. I fear a lack of them. -Isaac Asimov
  52. Re:DIGG by Toonol · · Score: 1

    I had an interesting IT experience about a year back, and said to myself, "self, I bet you could make the front page of digg with _this_".

    I think you just gamed Slashdot.

  53. Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ by courseofhumanevents · · Score: 1

    I love this troll. Here's to ten more years!

  54. You Can Sell Out Without Selling Out by prock307 · · Score: 1

    OK, Here is a suggestion that may help grow Slashdot, but I am not sure how the rest of you will like it. A "Slashdot Daily" video feed/channel, like "Fast Lane Daily".

    So you post a 3 minute video to one/many/all of the numerous video feeds daily (and make sure it is a feed that gets picked up by TiVo so I can have it waiting when I get home from work).

    The video would contain some of the days top stories with narration and a video clip or picture that pertains to the story.

    For example the clip on "Capsaicin Tested On Surgical Wounds" would have a clip of CmdrTaco dripping Pure Cap on Hemo's paper cut to make it "heal better".

    The video would also have a 5-10 second commercial somewhere in there, like for ThinkGeek or somewhere else which could grow your revenue stream with a minimal amount of user aggravation.

    Just my two cents

    Patrick

  55. UserID 1000000? by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    I did a quick search, didn't see it.
    This is as good a topic as any to ask:

    Who won the user id 1000000 lottery? Please, stand up and announce yourself?

  56. re: Pro OSS yet Pro Apple? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    No, I don't have a "dim view" of you at all. I appreciate the reply.

    Perhaps I wasn't totally clear though. My stance is this. ALL companies are going to make their share of mistakes. Given enough time, yes, they'll even do some "slippery slope" things that leave you jittery about your privacy rights and such. I don't like it, but I accept it as reality. From there, I look at the pros and the cons, and decide overall which companies are worthy of praise, and which aren't.

    Currently, yes, I'd mod someone down for making anti-Google comments, because right now, they all center around the same old issues. (EG. Gmail keeps SO much of people's info, they're getting too powerful!) Until something actually happens that indicates Google is, indeed, doing something bad with all this info, it's just hypothetical fiction. If the story actually covered Google changing corporate policy and reselling the contents of people's emails - THEN I would of course give that due consideration!

    A "fanboy" treats a business like a religion, and claims it is "perfect in every way", basically. I don't treat Apple, Google, or any other business like that.

    Claiming it's a contradiction to like OSS but like Apple is an over-simplification too. Apple computers have a really good OS today because they were able to build on the strengths of open source. Apple's wish to dominate their market and eliminate possible competition defines business in a capitalist society. The idea is always that others will also be just as driven to "push back" with alternatives, and that vying for dominance creates a win-win situation for consumers. Right now, Apple is in transition from a "computer company" to a "media company". They have to juggle a lot of things to make that happen, including making some deals they probably don't really like (with DRM on music, restrictions on the iPhone, etc.). I can see where they're trying to go, long-term, with all of it - and unlike some people, I'm pretty ok with the "grand plan". They wouldn't HAVE an online music store today if they stubbornly insisted on idealistic ideas about music having NO restrictions on it, period. (Apple wasn't able to just buy the entire recording industry and make it a sub-set of their business, after all.)

  57. Intel Technology Center? by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

    I hate these meetings because I have to constantly be the guy that says 'No'. My worst fear for Slashdot is that someday someone with deep enough pockets comes along with a check so big that someone in the company with a shortsighted view of the future is willing to cash over top of my objections.

    Tell us about that "Intel Technology Center" thing that hung around for a while (I just now noticed is gone)? How did that come about? What did you feel about it? Where'd it go?
    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  58. Expand the discussion model but keep us by cjalmeida · · Score: 1

    What's great about slashdot is the quality of the discussions and it's model of moderation and information filtering. It's not only geekdom that's overloaded with information. Business, politics, celebrities' life, sports, etc. Why try to squeeze money out /. if you can clone it, put some makeup, and try to build a comunity out around another subject?

  59. Thanks by theolein · · Score: 1

    Thanks for this site, Rob. We come from all sorts of different backgrounds and do all sorts of things, but I like to think that this is one place where we can kind of just be our petulant selves. May you have a lot of sucess in your life.

  60. Re:DIGG by wrackley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let us know how much you made off slashdot.

  61. The future of slashdot - 2 ideas by eagl · · Score: 1

    I have 2 ideas concerning the future of slashdot.

    First, an approach to gaining new readership and bringing new web interfaces to slashdot. Another website I frequently view (www.hardocp.com) also grew to the point where they had to expand their offerings without alienating their old-time viewers. In the end, they essentially tabbed their website. Their homepage is pretty much the same old hardocp, but they have tabs at the top of the homepage that link to more specialized versions of their basic site. They can now offer much more content without alienating their long-time readers who habitually hit their front page looking for cutting edge hardware news.

    Slashdot already has sections which focus news, but there could be some sort of tab selection at the top between the slashdot logo and the search box to select more focused, "modern" sites that might appeal to newer viewers without diluting slashdot.

    Second, an approach to active marketing. You've already pegged who slashdot readers are, and the ad selection pretty much covers all the usual "push" marketing we'd expect to see for people marketing tech crap to the usual slashdot readership. But what about the various "pull" stuff the average slashdotter looks for on their own time? Two examples I can think of right off the top of my head are things like online universities or online degrees (I'm getting my MBA online now but had to google for a suitable program myself), and professional associations or services such as professional journals, legal databases, etc. My online degree program gives me access to proquest and a couple of other very nice virtual libraries, but my access to those resources ends when I finish my degree. Might those organizations or similiar professional associations be interested in advertising to the slashdot readership, who seem to be mostly tech oriented professionals who are also addicted to information?

    My point is that going out and deliberately finding advertisers who offer services the readership might be interested in would be more productive than rejecting yet another ad offering from www.boobies.com. There are tons of professional resources that we are interested in both personally and professionally, but we seem to mostly get ads for microsoft's (or sun's) latest or whatever hardware knicknack is on sale this week.

  62. an honor and a pleasure by sar · · Score: 1

    Frankly, as odd as it sounds, I'm honored and pleased to have been able to enjoy this site for the last 10 years (including the original 'Chips & Dips' with the WM themes and your kooky animations). This place is the only one that I have done my best to check every day at least once in the morning, just to see what was new and what others thought about it. Hell, I've even done three years in prison (long story), and met one other person there that read here.

    You've come a long way, and still have a ways to go.

    Cheers

    --
    .
  63. Topic by mqduck · · Score: 1

    We could gain traffic by posting boobs or covering other subjects Well, that settles it. "Boobs" will be the new Slashdot subject. Get working on the icon.
    --
    Property is theft.
  64. I agree by mendie · · Score: 1

    7 years worth of lurking and I've finally got around to getting a login and posting (pity - a low UID would have been nice!) As Mozilla to the browser, Linux to the OS, /. to the web... Thanks to those due, and here's to me posting a similar message in 10 years time.

  65. Gaining Traffic by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    We could gain traffic by posting boobs or covering other subjects, but that would distract us from our real focus. And it would drive you guys away

    Well, that depends on who's boobs you post.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  66. And Yet... by Spectra72 · · Score: 1
    Or take Columbine. When this tragedy hit, our readers took it a differently. Instead of blaming video games, we looked hard at the culture of abuse that drives high school. We talked about how the jocks beat us up. We knew that the terrible events of that day are almost inevitable when you stick kids into a system where certain groups of kids are given free reign to beat up others based on extra curricular activities. During that series of stories many people had a place to talk. It was cathartic. Our role was small, but it mattered.


    Slashdot was no better than the Mass Media at identifying the true issues involved in Columbine. While the media and politicians ran with the Marilyn Manson/video game angle to confirm their own biases, Slashdot ran with the bully meme, which was no more accurate and just as much of a bias.

    The Columbine shooters were not motivated or pushed to the edge by bullies. The facts just don't bear it out, but the story lives on because it suits the people pushing that angle. It justifies their biases and prejudices. Just like Cassie Bernall, one of the Columbine victims, did not actually get shot for affirming her belief in God/Jesus but it suits the Evangelical Christian movement to push that story.

    Instead of an event deserving kudos, the Voices from the Hellmouth series is a black mark on Slashdot.
  67. Re:Wait unitl your baby has his own Slashdot accou by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

    (I hope it's a boy)
    And you're apparently REALLY banking on that hope...
    --
    ResidntGeek
  68. All one of us in River Falls, WI agree! by qcs-rf.com · · Score: 1

    I have had ./ as my home page (more recently, a tab) since 1997 and aside from vacations and major life events (having a daughter, losing family, moving) for the whole time I have been among the silent majority who religiously scan all the articles on the main page and read the ones that interest me. Over the years I've checked in with k5, digg and others, but I always come back to ./.

    ./ is A Good Thing.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  69. Random surprises by jc42 · · Score: 1

    There's constant pressure from within the company to create new "products". Sometimes these mean new/more/bigger ads which usually result in people installing junkbusters.

    Huh? Slashdot has ads? Who knew?

    We could gain traffic by posting boobs or covering other subjects, but that would distract us from our real focus. And it would drive you guys away.

    Well, my immediate thoughts was "That might entice me to turn the images and Web 2.0 junk back on." But then I thought "Nah; there's no shortage of them on other sites, some of which I have bookmarked. And I wouldn't go away, since I wouldn't see the boobs any more than I see the ads."

    What might drive me away is if the site were "improved" to the point that I couldn't reduce it to plain text with no eye candy. Sites with actual information shouldn't bother with such junk; it just annoys those of us who are looking for information and don't like wasting time suppressing the junk.

    Anyway, I'm somewhat sorry I missed the party. I had too many gigs. My sophisticated calculations conclude that the 20th anniversary will probably occur at Halloween, too, so I'll probably have too many gigs then, too.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  70. Revenue: For The Suits by TrailerTrash · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I'm a suit. A VP in a Really Huge Company, in Marketing, no less. Get your weasel on!

    So, here's the pitch: you already have paid subscribers. I'm one and have been for a long time.

    Sell me a Gold subscription. What do I get? HTTPS access? No thanks, my work-mandated copy of IE6 complains on every page refresh with that anyway. No, sell me what I want.

    Mod points.

    For USD$10 a month, I get 3 mod points a week, guaranteed.

    For USD$25 a month, I get 10 mod points a week, guaranteed.

    Would that destroy the socialism of /.? Probably not destroy, but possibly influence. But if that small sell-out allowed you to fend off paid content, then so be it.

    Just an idea.

    1. Re:Revenue: For The Suits by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I'm a suit. A VP in a Really Huge Company, in Marketing, no less. Get your weasel on!

      So, here's the pitch: you already have paid subscribers. I'm one and have been for a long time.

      Sell me a Gold subscription. What do I get? HTTPS access? No thanks, my work-mandated copy of IE6 complains on every page refresh with that anyway. No, sell me what I want.

      Mod points.

      For USD$10 a month, I get 3 mod points a week, guaranteed.

      For USD$25 a month, I get 10 mod points a week, guaranteed.

      Would that destroy the socialism of /.? Probably not destroy, but possibly influence. But if that small sell-out allowed you to fend off paid content, then so be it.

      Just an idea. It would generate a huge mess of conspiracy theroies. I have good reasons to believe the thing you mention is already done on a very highly dynamic site with infinite karma.

      Everyone modded down would claim some corporate suit did it by donating a gold member account or something. That would mark the end of slashdot in long term.

        I better say once again: people who "pays" to filter ads or https access (didn't even know it exists) doesn't really pay to filter ads. There are like 3 layers of software I am using (which is worth like $150) who would filter ads on any site. I keep them disabled and pay for being member. Why? I want to do my part of keeping site neutral, as far as it goes. I don't want to see a story attacking some other vendor while the competing vendors huge tower ad is in place on same page.

      Look to Spamcop.net , they got into very major trouble with millionaire spammers and have setup a legal defense fund. Despite the fact they are owned by IronPort and IronPort is owned by Cisco giant, there are still conspiracy theroists (some actually spammers) who believes that "Donate button" is for Spammers wanting to set themselves free of Spamcop.

  71. Oops by anticypher · · Score: 1

    I hadn't looked at that in a long time. My bad.

    The correct notation would be

    http://[::1]/subtlety/is/not/my/strongpoint.html

    the AC

    the slashdot filter doesn't like IPv6 address notation in the URL field, but I know you typed it correctly and got pwn3d by the filter

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:Oops by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Bah. It's what I get for not using preview.

  72. Oblig. GN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's spelt niche. N-I-C-H-E. Oh, and randomly YELLING is a sign of LOW INTELLIGENCE.

    Regards,

    Your friendly neighbourhood Grammar Nazi.

  73. False dichotomy by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    And an angry user is 10 fold more likely to post than a happy one. And when nobody can agree on anything... well there's meaning in that too.

    Angry/happy doesn't work. Perhaps angry/placid and sad/happy. I'd agree angry posts outweigh placid ones, but I fail to see the same correlation between happy and sad, in fact I would find it very difficult to categorise any given post in this manner.

    Oh, and we <3 you too Rob.

  74. Thankyou! by Super+Jamie · · Score: 1

    Thanks so much for this series, I've really loved reading it, it takes me back to a day when the internet was a much better place.

    For what it's worth, my "regular geek news" is the Slashdot and Digg Technology RSS feeds, in a Firefox Live Bookmark. I often find Slashdot has better articles in 15 items, than Digg Tech does in a whole screenfull.

    Keep up the good work guys!

  75. Damn it! by thebigbadme · · Score: 1

    I just came online to check my e-mail, then go to bed. That was 1:45... and now it's 3am, and I'm reading /.

    I hope I'm still hitting myself over the head in 10 years!

    thanks

    --
    "It's the Law of the Universe, and I'm the sheriff." Slash-cott 2/10-2/17
  76. Re: Pro OSS yet Pro Apple? by rozz · · Score: 1

    Currently, yes, I'd mod someone down for making anti-Google comments, because right now, they all center around the same old issues. (EG. Gmail keeps SO much of people's info, they're getting too powerful!) Until something actually happens that indicates Google is, indeed, doing something bad with all this info, it's just hypothetical fiction. If the story actually covered Google changing corporate policy and reselling the contents of people's emails - THEN I would of course give that due consideration!
    couldnt disagree more.
    1. sounds like your moderating habits are 100% against the /. rules ... which specifically state that you SHOULD NOT mod-down comments for the simple fact that you do not agree with the poster !!!

    2. "anti-google" ... it is precisely that kind of activism that keeps companies in line, especially big ones like google.
    Stop that and sooner or later they are gonna start thinking "noone cares about this stuff, we should do it".
    3. one of the oldest principles in this world says "it is better to Prevent than to Cure" ... why do you think that should be different for google? Why should ppl wait until they do a major fuck-up with those shitloads of info they are gathering?

    you sound like an articulate guy, but your mod habits are totally off (or at least the way u described them above) ... fanboism, group-thinking, opinion-based moderating and all other bad traits are there... maybe you should think again.
    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  77. my 2 cents of by rozz · · Score: 1

    thank you

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  78. I must add something by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has already a solution for large companies. Intel used it. They setup a special topic page (intel.slashdot.org) with Intel stories submitted by Intel. Besides it is obvious that Intel paid for it (it is made clear), there is a interesting side-effect. Stories have comments and they are run just like ordinary Slashdot stories. Some people (including AMD die hards) have moderation power, people can post comments being critical of the vendor and they are still safe since there is meta-moderation system in charge.
    Intel also showed their trust to themselves by allowing such thing and it was also mentioned couple of times.

  79. You are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "........I think anyone bashing them, yet claiming to be into technology, is foolish, bordering on hypocritical. So yes, I'd mod down an "anti Google" post myself, too!......"

    To you it doesn't matter if the person that is anti-Google has a well thought out, rational stance as to why they dislike Google. You mod them down because they disagree with you. Cognitive dissonance breeds ignorance, you already happily, even willingly treading down that path.

    I've been reading /. for a long time, without ever creating an account. (gasp!) The sad thing that you (royal you) people don't get is that you are hypocrites. The only difference between a MS fanboy and an Apple fanboi is where they buy there coffee (and perhaps their hybrid coupes). You are as much a part of the institution that you're trying to stand up against.

    F'n posers.

  80. Re: Pro OSS yet Pro Apple? by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Currently, yes, I'd mod someone down for making anti-Google comments, because right now, they all center around the same old issues.
    ...
    A "fanboy" treats a business like a religion, and claims it is "perfect in every way", basically.

    Most religions use the dodge of "these is the same thing we've heard before" when it comes to having their faith questioned. This sounds like the same thing to me. From what you have said here you qualify as a fanboi to me. Maybe you don't like the label but the blind moderation of a post that criticizes a business is fanboism in my book.

    Claiming it's a contradiction to like OSS but like Apple is an over-simplification too. Apple computers have a really good OS today because they were able to build on the strengths of open source.

    Without getting too far off topic; Building on open source and being open source are oceans apart. From what I've seen here the open source crowd is up in arms over the concept that Microsoft's dealings with Linux vendors may be leading to close source ventures. So how is that different from Apple? Also, I've never seen an open source venture who has bashed or made moves against those who hacked their design. Let's see... iPod, iPhone and OSX? How many people have gotten hosed by Apple in some form for creating modifications their design? Come on now, that screams of being against the same ideology that made open source a movement instead of just a couple of guys cranking out code.

    They may have taken ideas from the open source crowd but they certainly aren't friendly to the concept in their business practice.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  81. /. back to the people? by vinlud · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what the current value of Slashdot is but if we are really scared what will happen to /. when Rob leaves someday, wouldnt it be an idea to try to buy it as a group? I for one don't like the idea of Slashdot losing editorial independence, will not welcome any corporate overlord and would donate to prevent it from happening, if possible.

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  82. To vs. too by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

    I love Slashdot, love the content and the community, and have enjoyed the inside perspective on its history and future. Congrats to Rob et al. on their achievement.

    However, in /. tradition, not to be a grammar Nazi, but the misuse of "to" and "too" in this piece (as in "if it isn't to much trouble") was irritating.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  83. Modern web application? by runexe · · Score: 1

    I want to echo everyone else that already said it: Thanks very much Taco - I've been enjoying the site for many years now, and imagine I will continue to do so.

    As you think about the future, I have to wonder about the remark: What does slashdot need to make it a 'modern web application'? The most recent updates to the look and feel are for the most part good with me. My general thoughts are that you have a modern interface already, and for the time being about the best thing you could do is just subtle tweaks here and there. Making things a little easier to navigate, incremental improvements that speed load/rendering time in most browsers. I don't think you need to re-think slashdot to become a modern web app. Just little fixes here and there, occasionally trying something out to see if it looks/feels better.

    Looking forward to the next 10 years...

  84. Re:DIGG by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    A Measly $3.62 so far....622 page impressions, 8 clicks.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  85. LWN by booch · · Score: 1

    If you're a GNU/Linux user, I'd recommend you go take a look at Linux Weekly News (LWN). They're very much like Slashdot, in that they steer very clear from the corporate greed. They've been around for about as long, and have remained independent, with minimal ads. Their articles are very well-written and well-edited. (I.e. they're also very different from Slashdot!) I read Slashdot several times a day, but I actually consider LWN to be my number 1 site. I pay for both sites, even though though the subscriptions don't offer all that much feature-wise.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  86. Re:DIGG by GoRK · · Score: 1

    I too think your example about your powerbook story making digg to be non-exemplary. To be honest with you, digg is the best place for that and when I go to digg that is the kind of thing that I expect. You said you only made about $20 from the thing so that, to me, doesn't seem like enough motivation to go to the effort and expense of gaming digg. If you tried to game digg with crap, you would fail. I mean there are people out there like kipkay that are supposedly successful at it, but at the same time if kipkay's videos really sucked, he wouldn't be.

  87. Re:Bring Back Geeks In Space! Slashbaaack. by pruneau · · Score: 1

    Slash_Baaack !
    Slash__BaAaAaAaAaAck !
    Slash___BAAAAAAAAAAAAAck !
    It saved my /news life when I was wery buzzy.

    --
    [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
  88. Thanks from Italy by nihil39 · · Score: 1

    I've been reading /. since 2001, but more often since 2004. This site has been for me one the greatest source of knowledge and one of the most interesting websites since then. I learned a lot reading the discussions here (I'm a gentoo user because of this site). The constant provision of interesting, funny, nerdy, scientific stories and, above all, the discussions about them are all features that make this place truly unique. The debates here are really useful to point out one's flaws, biases and mistakes. I'm a bit bashful but, believe it or not, I also found appealing the "social" debates that sometimes arise here, e.g: the discussion about nerds' virginity/lack of social skills or stuff like that (I do have a little social life but I have one, I assure you!). The idea of a periodical publishing of a collection of the best comments (that someone has proposed before) could be a boon to /. visibility, but I don't know if it will generate any revenue. It sure wouldn't be weird to see /. as a popular-science-technology magazine.

    Finally, I want to thank all the people that made this site and all the people that keep it running. I hope it will remain integer and interesting as it has been till today.

    PS
    I'm Italian, I apologize for any mistake I made.

  89. Re: Pro OSS yet Pro Apple? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think modding a post down as "overrated" would be well within the definition of what the term means, if I use it to mod down yet another "I'm against Google because they've got so much info, it makes them EVIL!" type of post.

    Look, Google got ALL of the info they have today VOLUNTARILY. Again, what happened to personal responsibility here? If you're that worried/paranoid/whatever about a big corporation having the ability to search and read your email, don't sign up for a free account with them! Or alternately, only use your gmail account for unimportant information you're not concerned with them having. Or hey, maybe use it as a "throw-away" address for all your spam to go to?

    Activism is great, when it targets a real, existing problem. Activism loses its credibility and potential usefulness when it's used as a bullying or scare tactic. (EG. Greenpeace's fixation on making Apple look bad for environmental issues, despite them contributing FAR less to the problem that manufacturers selling FAR more products with similar or worse environmental "footprints".)

    For the record, I rarely mod *anything* down, because I prefer using my mod points in a positive way (as encouraged by Slashdot themselves).

  90. Absolutely no. by shivamib · · Score: 0

    Not here, not now, not ever.

  91. Re: Pro OSS yet Pro Apple? by rozz · · Score: 1

    I think modding a post down as "overrated" would be well within the definition of what the term means, if I use it to mod down yet another "I'm against Google because they've got so much info, it makes them EVIL!" type of post.
    yours is far from being the worst sample of "opinion-moderation" but i still think it is not ok.


    Look, Google got ALL of the info they have today VOLUNTARILY. Again, what happened to personal responsibility here? If you're that worried/paranoid/whatever about a big corporation having the ability to search and read your email, don't sign up for a free account with them! Or alternately, only use your gmail account for unimportant information you're not concerned with them having. Or hey, maybe use it as a "throw-away" address for all your spam to go to?
    you got a good point, it is not their fault that ppl are so careless with their info ... but still, that amount of info is very dangerous and should be kept under very strict supervision.


    Activism is great, when it targets a real, existing problem. Activism loses its credibility and potential usefulness when it's used as a bullying or scare tactic. (EG. Greenpeace's fixation on making Apple look bad for environmental issues, despite them contributing FAR less to the problem that manufacturers selling FAR more products with similar or worse environmental "footprints".)
    sorry, cant comment on this particular sample cause i dont know much about the issue.

    as about greenpeace targeting pretty much any tech company, i agree with that ... all tech companies are big pollutants and i havent heard of any of them implementing and following a serious anti-pollution & energy-conservation strategy.


    For the record, I rarely mod *anything* down, because I prefer using my mod points in a positive way (as encouraged by Slashdot themselves).
    100% agree with that ... i never used down-modpoints and the most corrections i made in meta-moderation were down-mods.
    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  92. Thanks for the Daily /. Email by donak · · Score: 1

    Don't know if it's been said before, but I for one am grateful for the daily compilation of stories, delivered to my inbox.
    It keeps me in touch with what's going on, even if I don't have the time to venture to the website - and I can duck out of moderation/meta-moderation without actually making myself unavailalbe ;-)

    (Only when pressed for time, honest!)

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...