Slashdot Mirror


Monster Cables Pushes Around the Wrong Small Company

Alien54 writes "Audioholics has a fun read regarding a recent legal dustup involving Monster Cables. The well-known (some might say notorious) cabling company sent a cease and desist letter to Blue Jeans Cable over a supposed patent violation. What the Monster folks couldn't have known was that Blue Jeans president Kurt Denke used to be a lawyer. His response is as humorous as it is thorough. ' Let me begin by stating, without equivocation, that I have no interest whatsoever in infringing upon any intellectual property belonging to Monster Cable. Indeed, the less my customers think my products resemble Monster's, in form or in function, the better ... If there is more than one such connector design in actual use by Monster Cable as to which appropriation of trade dress is alleged, of course, I will require this information for each and every such design. On the basis of what I have seen, both in the USPTO documents you have sent and the actual appearance of Monster Cable connectors which I have observed in use in commerce, it does not appear to me that Monster Cable is in a position to advance a nonfrivolous claim for infringement of these marks.'"

145 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read every word of that rather long article, and all I have to say is "OWNED". Wow. Normally I refer from such Internet slang, but I really believe in my heart that it applies here.

    1. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Were Monster cable "owned"?

      They're just going to harass someone else now. They don't really care that much. The basic business plan here is "threaten to sue", "threaten some more", "If target refuses to settle then give up, else settle". They know full well that some people are going to call their bluff. He just happened to do it in a very long winded, wordy way that has saved them a lot of time and effort.

    2. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by masdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The long-winded and wordy way, combined with being released on the Internet, will go a long way towards keeping Monster from doing this again. The next company they threaten to sue will likely turn up this letter in a simple Google search, providing that company's legal counsel with a bucket full of ammo.

      I would say Monster's days of running around suing competitors will be drawing to a close soon.

    3. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My favorite quote:

      Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it.

      Good to see a little guy who seriously intends to go not only to trial but to final judgement against a big patent bully. They definitely picked the wrong person to pick on.

    4. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by JordanL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My favorite part is where he obliquely mentions that if they do take him to court and try to bleed him dry he'll kindly foward along their sham company tax shelter methods to the IRS that they use to avoid paying income tax on their Intellectual Property. That's gotta scare the hell out of most companies.

    5. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ComSon0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is the most beautiful letter I ever read. It teared my eyes. I am a dude, but I think I love that guy.

    6. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you refrain more than you refer, but I refrigerate.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    7. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I also love when he threatens Rule 11 sanctions, demands extensive discovery, and threatens to challenge each and every one of their patents. Oh, and he accuses them of acting in bad faith, without candor.

      But really, you're right -- threatening their tax shelter was a masterstroke.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    8. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The whole letter is a lawyers way to tell them to go *** themselves.

      But it's really good to read!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Workaphobia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed. I especially liked the transition from the beginning of the letter, where he responded with feigned interest and dozens of requests for more information, to the middle where he gave a detailed technical justification for his design, to the end where he became downright threatening to Monster, and rightly so. Here is a man who knows how to scare off a litigation troll.

      Also, notice how he replied on the last day of the two week period Monster's lawyers gave him. This, combined with the number of requests for clarification he made, demonstrates that he will ensure any actual court proceedings drag on for as long as possible.

      He sure as hell didn't blink.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    10. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by mr_death · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no "sham company tax shelter methods" -- just the usual legal method of tranferring income from a high tax juristiction to a lower one. Companies and people do this all the time (e.g., US/Bermuda, California/Nevada) to avoid their biggest and unnecessary expense.

      The threat here is not "you're going to jail", but "we're going to expose you to political ridicule for not passively bending over and paying whatever the government demand."

      If you don't consider this method as a part of your tax planning, you're paying more than you need to. As Judge Learned Hand said, "Anyone may arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible, everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right; for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands. Taxes are an enforceable action, not a voluntary contribution."
      Helvering vs Gregory
      60 Fed (2d) 809

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    11. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Both you and the GP talk about tax shelters like they're illegal.
      [...]
      Tax laws are riddled with loopholes and investment firms make lots of money figuring out how to work within the rules. Oh, sure. The key is that these rules are so complicated that attempts to jump through the loop holes frequently result in mistakes. The question Monster needs to ask themselves is if they feel lucky.

      Basically, by questioning the "arm's length" relationship between the two entities in their licensing agreements, he's saying that they'd better make sure their financial house is in order before bringing him to court.

      Then again, I run away screaming at the prospect of having to learn corporate tax law, so I may be too trusting of his oblique threat.
      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    12. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dubbreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..go *** themselves..
      Go ass themselves?
      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    13. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      I about shit my pants I laughed so hard at this.

    14. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by PingXao · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's completely legal. Unethical and unpatriotic, yes, but not illegal. In fact, since Bush took office those kinds of arrangements have actually been sanctioned and encouraged by the government.

    15. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My favorite quote from the easy to copy yet not worth the bother (asshats) is at the very beginning: "Re: Your letter, recieved April Fool's day
      Dear Monster Lawyers"

      Priceless!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    16. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      I hate to be that guy, but the fellow who wrote that letter doesn't understand how to use a semi-colon.

      "Use a semicolon between the clauses of a compound sentence when the conjunction is omitted or when the connection is not close." (Taintor and Monro, 1988, The Secretary's Handbook) The writer has used a sentence of the "not only, but rather" from and used a semicolon in place of the missing conjunction "but".

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    17. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by vwjeff · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income;..."

      Wonderful. Monster Cable hates America!!!!

    18. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Informative

      When considering Tax issues, just keep in mind this little nugget of trivia...

      Tax law is the only area of the law where a lawyer is expected to obtain
      a speciality post doctorate degree (that is another advanced degree above
      and beyond the usual JD) just so that you can be considered qualified to
      START practicing in it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by clamatius · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I got to the end of that article, I half expected to see it signed "Summer Glau".

    20. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not necessarily. I license some of my patents, and the standard license includes full rights for the licensee to begin litigation over violations of the license. In other words, as part of their license they receive rights to also prosecute my patent for me. And yes, this is legal - the licensee has a financial interest in maintaining my patents and protecting the market.

      I'm sure Monster would do the same thing - they license the tech from their Burmuda entity, and also have full rights to pursue patent infringement on behalf of their licensor.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    21. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I only see one questionable use of the semi-colon in the quoted text: the first occurrence. The first use is (arguably) better-suited to be replaced by a colon, but the use of the semi-colon will suffice. Every other use of of the semi-colon is unarguably legitimate. Its use is to reduce ambiguity that would arise, had the writer rather used commas, due to the presence of commas within the components of the series he is enumerating.

      Fucker.

    22. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't illegal per se. However there are at least two issues that need to be considered.

      One is "transfer pricing". Is Monster IP Bermuda Ltd charging Monster Cables Inc too much for the patent licenses? If so, they will be in trouble with the IRS. That what he talks about when he refers to "bona fide arms-length transactions". It has to be the same as what, for example, Belkin would be willing to pay to license the patents.

      Secondly, the Bermuda company may be resident in the US for tax purposes. I'm not familiar with the US rules on residence, but in the UK, an offshore company is resident in the UK for tax purposes if it is controlled by persons who are resident in the UK.

    23. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      The whole letter is a lawyers way to tell them to go *** themselves.

      Actually, there's a much shorter lawyers' way to tell somebody to do that.

      "We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram."

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    24. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Informative
      You missed his point - indeed, it took me a while to realize. There is nothing wrong with it, it is legal if it meets the definition of a bona fide arms-length setup.

      But, but it wasn't Monster Cable International, Ltd, that issued him with the letter and claim. It was Monster in the US, so keen to litigate that they did something they had no onus to do ("on behalf of") - they completely forgot that their corporate shell game had given the patents to a company in Bermuda, and that they had no right to claim patent infringement when they weren't the patent owners.

      More clear now?

      "That, that's not ours! We don't have to pay tax on it! Oh, wait, you're using this thing of ... uh ... not ours ... and we ... uh ... they ... can't have that!"

    25. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you see, if they abandon their effort, Tartan can still pursue them for improper business practices, vexatious litigation and antitrust violations. It's beautiful. If they pursue it, they risk damaging future cases, and if they drop it, it becomes apparent that they merely intended to put out meritless claims, hoping that others would settle. Doing that would be a clearly improper practice, and they can be placed under injunctions to prevent them from doing it to others. It's LOSE/LOSE for Monster.

    26. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dwater · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the legal equivalent of Clint Eastwood's "Make my day, punk".

      --
      Max.
    27. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Funny

      AH HA Caught you Tom Cruise!

    28. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ouch, mods.

      But, the long string of semicolons is separating a list of lists. He describes in comma-delimited clauses each aspect of the cable, and separates the clauses themselves with semicolons.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    29. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TommydCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've bought a bunch of cables from them when I was remodelling my basement for in-wall use (actually turning into an everlasting project... but...).

      This was directly after I had to return some 30' HDMI cables I got from monoprice for not working at 1080p from my xbox360. This put me in a crunch to get new ones since the drywall was about to go in.

      I found Blue Jeans Cable referenced on AVS Forum (you will can weeks digging through A/V topics there) and saw their location was just up the street from where I work. They said I could pick it up in person and waived the shipping charges within a day!

      The cables are of excellent quality regardless of the price - which happens to be very affordable. I was most concerned about the HDMI cables at that length, but their website said it should work - and they did with flying colors, so to speak. I got their top of the line for the 1080p and the cheaper Tartan for DirecTV stuff (top res is 1080i), but it turns out I had no issue with their Tartan cable at 1080p either.

      I was impressed with their operation.

      Sorry for sounding like a marketing cheerleader, but I'm pulling for them, especially after the entertaining read. These are good guys, selling great product at excellent prices. They have earned my future business and do not deserve to be on the litigation receiving end of unethical competitors.

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    30. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Question to anyone familiar with legal practicality: How hard would it be for us bored Slashdotters to watch Monster Cable's litigation team and just forward the letter to anyone they threaten? Surely Legal actions are a matter of public record? Or do the settlements typically occur out of the public space?

      Furthermore, in light of the defences here, can't prior targets of Monster Cable who have settled claim that they settled under duress? After all, threatening with litigation is threatening.

      --
      I hate printers.
    31. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *sigh*

      It is perfectly good English.

      Semicolons do roughly the same thing as periods; they're just not a full stop. They're wonderful things because they allow you to imply logical connections between ideas without getting bogged down in really pedantic conjunctions. Just take two clauses and put a semicolon in-between; you've just implied a relationship between them!

      Embrace the semicolon! Don't overdo it of course, but that goes for most things in life!

    32. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by caliburngreywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was installing sat systems, back in the dawn of HD content, four times I was handed a shiny box of Monster brand component cables by a grinning customer. "use these" they all said. Three times, those cables failed to work. Three times out of four I used the cheap no-name included cables (which always worked, by the way... 0 failures out of perhaps 100.)and handed the customer their open box of monster cables and said "get a refund" From that experience alone I would not use a Monster product unless it was handed to me free.

    33. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then take him to English court; if you dare, Bitch.

      --
      Software patents delenda est.
    34. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's actually a peninsula.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    35. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by iainl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The letter's point is that offshore tax shelters are indeed legal. If the offshore company is correctly run as a seperate entity perfoming proper arms-length transactions with the parent.

      However. He then shows that they've cocked up once, by forgetting to send the patent infringement claim from the Bermuda company that actually owns those patents. Do they really feel the rest of their ducks are correctly aligned, should the IRS come knocking?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    36. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's do a Microsoft and extend it after embracing it. I propose the interrosemicolon. It's to the semicolon what the interrobang is for the exclamation mark. The interrosemicolon is used to conjoin a question with a noninquisitive statement.

      Actually, I should patent that: "Method and apparatus to syntactically denote a logical connection between two statements, the first of which shall be inquisitive and the second of which shall be noninquisitive - on the internet." (Last part added so the USPTO rubber-stamps the application.)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  2. Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

    Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate.

    1. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't somebody do a "golden ear" A-B test that determined that Monster speaker cable was no better than an extension cord with the connectors cut off?

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      They might have had some (quickly rebutted) case in the analogue era, but with the digital era they are just outright cheating customers. You can get an HDMI cable for as low as 15 cents, but Monster continues to charge up towards $100 for theirs. Obviously with digital any cable is as good as another, because the system has error correction built into it and is not susceptible to distortion from nearby wiring.

      Still, on Usenet I've seen people who, probably because they already "invested" thousands of dollars in Monster Cables, placed so much trust in the company that they brought out arcane arguments that, yes, Monster digital interconnects are better than anything else on the market. After all, can't you hear how "brighter" and "warmer" the sound is once you've blown money on the interconnects?

    3. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by peipas · · Score: 3, Informative

      EXTREMELY expensive cables That is 100% correct. I bought a spool of 12 gauge speaker wire from Lowes for pennies on the dollar spent on Monster cable.

      There is one Monster product, however, that was worth the purchase. I sought an FM modulator and while none that I tried had any problems with reception, the several I tried before the Monster unit had awful, flat sound quality. In this case the premium was for a superior product, not just a name.
    4. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Ariastis · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they did it with a coat hanger (At the consumerist)

    5. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate. I agree with your basic point, but I'd add "And the connections are all solid." (including good soldering/other connection from the wire to the plug and good contact plug-to-jack, or good direct wire-to-component connections for plugless cables)

      But yeah, there are standing offers out there from a number of sources for anyone who can consistently double-blind ABX the difference between various "high-end" cables and much cheaper large gauge copper wires.
      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    6. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty much. Here's a good article that summarizes the state of "premium" cables.

      http://www.electronichouse.com/article/the_truth_about_high_end_cables/C29

    7. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Several times, and the physics of why Monster cables do nothing that plain wire can't do is well understood. Bulk 12 gauge multi strand copper is all you need for the highest end gear, and most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    8. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by hudsonhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the Consumerist did no such thing. If you read the article, all the Consumerist did, in fact, was quote a 4 year old post by a random dude on an internet forum.

      That's hardly what I would call a reliable source of information, and yet people continue to perpetuate the mean as truth because it appeals to their pre-existing notions.

    9. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean that Monster Cables running to Bose speakers WON'T make me cool?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by dmd53 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember that! I've just spent the last semester studying the properties of materials affecting conductivity, and my main conclusion has been... copper is pretty darn good for the price. Sure, there are some fancy things you can do like doping it with silver and the like, but the addition of most things will actually raise the resistivity of the alloy. For good hi-fi, all you need is pure copper, and I'd be very surprised if Monster has a patent on that.

      By the way, this isn't the first time Monster Cables has used frivolous lawsuits to their advantage-- they also have a habit of suing anyone with the word "Monster" in their name:

      http://www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/HallOfShame/MonsterCable/MonsterCable.shtml

    11. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Informative

      Equal performance is subject to debate. True, a simple increase in cable guage provides better signal, but filtering of external interference, Monster does that a bit better than their competitors. Is it worth it though? If you install properly sized cables and route them away from sources of interference, it's no big deal.

      Now, that's really for analog signals... As for digital, it's not really a concern. A $15 HDMI or DVI cable is just as good as a $85 HDMI cable, assuming they're both rated for the same frequency response and distance (HDMI has several classifications, and it CAN make a difference).

      As for fiber cables, light is light. A thicker, stronger shell simply helps protect you from over bending the cable and refracting the beam, but it adds no shielding or signal quality improvement of any kind, and in fact, the fiber core itself must be a very specific size in microns. Changing this size like you do in ordinary cables is not optional.

      If you have a high end system, increasing cable thickness, adding better cable contacts, and improving shielding can be important, and can improve audio and video quality. On the other hand, unless you're running cables across power lines, very close to speakers, close to tube TVs, or over long distances, Monster offers no "discernable" differences vs their half priced competitors.

      That said never use the cheap shit cables that actually come in the box. Allways buy quality replacements, and ensure the connectors are made from materials that don't corrode (i.e. not copper, silver, or aluminum) gold contacts are great, platinum is not worth the expense. In most cases you'll need new cables anyway just to make the distance between devices as 3' is almost never enough, but don't buy cheap unshielded cables ever. Allways look for decent stuff.

      When buying a stereo or speakers, look to buy models that support screw on connections or tightening rings for the speaker wire. The cheap little clip style slots, like you typically find on the back of cheaper speakers and all-in-one stereo units do not provide a sufficient contact surface for 100 watt and higher outputs.

      As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300. If you have high def, a suround sound stereo, a PS3 or xbox360, keep this in mind. 97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. Surge protectors only stop massive oversurges (typically over 160 volts). Damage to computer electronics cn occur at voltage below 104 or above 116. Do your lights ever flicker in your house? Especially when your AC turns on or when your fridge kicks in? If so, GO BUY A POWER FILTER for every digital device in your house!!!

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    12. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      an HDMI cable for as low as 15 cents [amazon.com] Actually, $5.05 shipped :)

      Most of the other sellers offer it for $2 with $3 shipping, if you prefer...
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope. Actually, outside slashdot, most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference even with an oscilloscope. They'd just look at it and ask, "WTF is this thing and why is it in my living room?"
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by doombringerltx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And also these coat hangers only made a 2m long connection. They don't have any shielding so if you run them over long distances you will get interference. While 2m is more than long enough for a simple home stereo, some people need longer cables. For example at my parent's house, my dad has his sound system set up in the living run but has cables running through the ceiling to the patio and to the kitchen so he can listen to music while he cooks. A 50ft unshielded cable would sound awful and staticy. I still think monster cables are a massive rip off but, assuming that the forum post is legit, comparing the cables to a wire hanger at that short of a length isn't really fair and its not surprising they had similar sound.

    15. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and I'd be very surprised if Monster has a patent on that.

      This is about design patents rather than a utility patents. It's probably more comparable to a trademark than a utility patent. An example of a design patent would be the Coca cola bottle.

    16. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks for the warning. You've convinced me not to use coat hangers in my setup.

    17. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Taagehornet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Monster continues to charge up towards $100

      Actually they aren't the biggest thieves, how about $5900 for 1m of low-bandwidth data cable? It puzzles me somewhat that no one has sued the so called high-end audio cable industry for fraud and false advertising.

    18. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by moexu · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean that Monster Cables running to Bose speakers WON'T make me cool? I'm pretty sure the proper term for that is douchebag.
      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    19. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by torkus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but no. On several grounds.

      Yes, you can buy a DEFECTIVE HDMI cable. One that actually works will - quite simply - work.

      Second, error correction is meant to fix ... errors. As long as your errors don't exceed the maximum corruption threshold it doesn't matter how many it corrects. This is basic probability and statistics. For a more empirical example - look at your good old CD. Error correction is done frequently with no data loss except in gross cases.

      Digital systems have very specific signal specifications. Your data either comes across intact according to those specs or it doesn't. pass/fail. 1 or 0. There is no subjective measurement. There is no 'brighter' sound. That's the WHOLE POINT of digital.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    20. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by webrunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      How ironic is it, that a company known for it's cables really only does good work in wireless?

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    21. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ACTUALLY, outside of slashdot most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a lamp cord and oscilloscope...

    22. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by pbhj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. That's funny that's the same percentage as that of statistics made up in slashdot posts ...

    23. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate.
      Mostly true, but quality is worth paying for.

      Gold plating will help resist corrosion. Thicker cables are also more likely to resist breaking. For line-level audio & video stuff, more shielding is better, especially for long runs and near 120V lines. Also the connectors (and the wires where they enter the connectors) is the place most likely to break, so premium connectors with nice strain relief are definately nice to have.

      I am more than happy to pay a little more for premium cable that I know won't break or cause me problems. It is frustrating to spend 15 minutes debugging a piece of video equipment, just to find the problem is a cable that has broken (I know from experience).

      I have never purchased Monster, but would have considered it if I could find them on a great sale. Now that I know what type of low-life scum-sucking company they are, I will not touch their stuff with a 10-foot pole, even if they were giving it away.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    24. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Care to provide any data to back up those claims? Where are you getting that 97% number from? I have lights flickering all the time in my house and yet not a single electronic device has failed. Some are 5+ years old.

    25. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by sheldon · · Score: 4, Funny

      As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300. If you have high def, a suround sound stereo, a PS3 or xbox360, keep this in mind.


      LOL!

      Those are probably one of the biggest scams yet from Monster. ;-)
    26. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, its how the internet works, and god knows here's a lot of "noise" on the line, yet my text files sent over instant messengers are accurate :)

      Mabye urs r, but mine hav obvius signl 2 noiz isues. It muzt b teh cabels, and not ne problams with are skool sistems.

    27. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      EQUAL??? have you ever dissected a "monster" cable?

      Most of the time the $1.25 stereo RCA cable is of better quality than the $27.99 cable from monster. I have found only 3 strands of copper inside a monster stereo RCA cable after I get past all the useless rubber, plastic braid, cloth, foil... their cables are absolute crap. I'll use china cheapies WAY before I'll touch a monster cable.

      Hell Typicall when I have customers with problems with their HDMI it's the Monster cable. Swap it out with a cheapie or if they are the typically silly "videophile" I'll give them a "binary" brand that looks like it's expensive but passes our in house testing on the cable certifier. I have had Monster HDMI cables fail more often then they work on our cable certifier.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    28. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Funny

      (in addition to qualifying as a precious metals investment).

      My taxes are complex enough without having to qualify my sale of old cables at a yard sale as a capital loss, thank you.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    29. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Pax00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know man... most people I know would look at the oscilloscope and ask where the LSD was.

    30. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by bonehead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is claiming that digital is foolproof.

      What's being stated, which is a fact, is that with a digital signal, if you're not seeing and/or hearing a blatantly OBVIOUS problem, then higher quality cables will offer you NO benefit.

      A $200 HDMI cable will not offer a sharper or brighter picture than a $10 cable. It will produce the EXACT SAME picture. (Provided the obvious assumption that the $10 cable isn't so extremely substandard that it's producing obvious flaws in the picture.)

    31. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 5, Funny

      You obviously don't understand digital. Digital is all ones and zero's. If you have a kink in the cable, because it is made cheaply, then the 0's, being as they are round, can slip around the kink's, but the 1's, having sharp edges, pile up.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    32. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope. Actually, outside slashdot, most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference even with an oscilloscope. They'd just look at it and ask, "WTF is this thing and why is it in my living room?" Wrong! In this post-9/11 control-by-fear world, the average person would take one look at an oscilloscope and run away screaming that there is a BOMB in their HOUSE!
      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    33. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you haven't bought a high speed DSL cable, which is a two-wire phone cable going between the DSL modem and the wall jack? It makes pictures and videos downloaded over the internet so much more realistic. It's like the brea^Wimages come alive!

      Now I need to get a Monster High Speed IEEE 1284 printer cable -- it's only 35 bucks. I'm sure my Centronics printer will be far faster, and the pictures more vibrant!

    34. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      speaker cables shouldn't need shielding. At those kinds of powers it is going to take a hell of a lot of intereference to have a noticable effect.

      Take a look at van-damme proffessional speaker cable (which is afaict what is used at many big events) and you will notice that it is not shielded.

      On long speaker runs your biggest problem is going to be volt drop so the most important thing is to use a thick cable.

      On the other hand line level cables most certainly do need shielding because of the much lower power involved. Balanced line is also preferable for long runs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    35. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wrong! In this post-9/11 control-by-fear world, the average person would take one look at an oscilloscope and run away screaming that there is a BOMB in their HOUSE!

      While true, this is awfully strange, since no bombs were involved in 9/11 in any way :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    36. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the kind of connection if shielding matters. For speakers, no it really doesn't. Speakers are low impedance, balanced connections and as such are pretty much immune to noise. There just isn't much out there that produces sufficient amounts of interference to cause even a token response in speakers. Hence, regular line cord is a great choice for speaker cable, since the concern is low resistance. For consumer unbalanced interconnects it is a concern. They are very high impedance connections (input impedance on most devices is around 30k ohms or so) and very low voltage. As such, it doesn't take much interference to potentially be audible. Thus good shielded coax cable is the way to go.

    37. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's bravo-sierra, I'm afraid.

      I run speaker connections through unshielded Cat5e cabling, to the patch panel, back out again to the remote speakers, which involved four RJ-45 connections (one at the amp, two at the patch panel, one at the remote speaker set). It goes through at least 50 feet of UTP. I quite honestly can't tell the difference between the speakers connected directly and via the Cat5. I use two pairs per speaker.

      Perhaps if you live in an electrically noisy place with lots of motors you'd get noise, but you wouldn't notice it for the sound of all the motors.

  3. Once again... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot reposts a story found on Gizmodo that Gizmodo found on Digg that was first seen on reddit that...

    1. Re:Once again... by iamhigh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then submit it to /. sooner.

      Plus, since when is slashdot in competition with them? If I want to read stupid stories (surprised all the legal talk didn't scare the farkoids) and even worse comments, I will go to fark/reddit/digg. I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    2. Re:Once again... by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but Gizmondo has a rubbish comments system, Reddit is all about xkcd and how people are being mean to Barrack Obama (at the moment. A few months ago it was Ron Paul), and Digg is full of Digg users.

    3. Re:Once again... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, for amusing reuse and evolution of memes (along with not so amusing ones) and the creative-as-hell trolls.
      Like, for example:

      I, for one, welcome our new unintimidated former lawyer CEO of a cable manufacturer overlord.

      Or, perhaps:

      In Soviet Russia, former lawyer CEOs sue YOU!!!

      Or maybe even

      1. Set up cable company
      2. Threaten lawsuits against other cable companies in existence
      3. Get settlements on all but one.
      4. Get bitchslapped by former lawyer CEO of said company.
      5. ????
      6. Pwned!!!!

  4. From TFA by madjalapeno · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best line of the reply has to be "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

    1. Re:From TFA by croddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      the whole thing is just a litany of pwn. this is the most badass response to legal threats i've seen in a long time; this guy has given even the pirate bay's collapsible baton gag a run for its money.

    2. Re:From TFA by everphilski · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I love what he's doing but I said "damn, damn, damn" when he went on and on about about his experiences as a lawyer. Something tells me that might be the difference between Monster pursuing and not pursuing this case. Had he not laid all his cards out on the table, he might have got the fight he was looking for, and showed Monster they can't bully everyone around. Part of me is afraid that won't happen now.

      But either way, I'm glad he's sticking up for himself, and not just himself but making it public. Others will catch on, I hope, and be able to use similar arguments and techniques to evaluate settling versus taking a stand.

    3. Re:From TFA by masdog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think about it from a business point of view, he's basically saving his company a lot of legal bills and hassle by not dragging it to trial.

    4. Re:From TFA by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think he necessarily wants to go to court. The reason he's warning them of both his experience and the near-total lack of any reasonable claim against him is so that they walk away and stop bothering him. I'm fairly certain they will do that. They're not interested in a fight, only in making competitors cower and pay them money. It's rather classic bully behavior, but all bullies, big or small, will tend to stay away from anything that looks even remotely like an even match, or worse, one where they're bound to lose.

      What will piss them off, of course, is that the letter has been made public. But that's his perogative.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:From TFA by lurker4hire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I think we haven't heard the last of this, IANAL but I'm pretty sure Monster is obligated to respond to his VERY specific requests. Either by admitting that their initial claim was complete horseshit or coughing up the requested documents and proceeding through with the next steps required to continue the initial threatened lawsuit.

      If Monster doesn't, again IANAL, but doesn't Denke (the CEO of the small company) have a claim against monster for threatening frivolous litigation? Maybe even for anti-competitive behaviour considering that Monster (the 362KG gorilla) is trying to threaten a small competitor out of business?

      l4h

    6. Re:From TFA by lurker4hire · · Score: 2, Informative
      actually scratch that, this line from the original letter kinda negates that theory:

      "If I do not hear from you within the next fourteen days, or if I do hear from you but do not receive all of the information requested above, I will assume that you have abandoned these claims and closed your file."
  5. Summary... by binaryspiral · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Monster Lawyers,

    The mention of similarity between my company and yours makes me throwup in my mouth a little. Your threats are empty and vague. You provided no details to your patent hissyfit.

    If you're actually attempting to prove you own a patent on the RCA connector, then fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

    Sincerely,
    Kurt Denke

    1. Re:Summary... by Zordak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're actually attempting to prove you own a patent on the RCA connector... Actually, they're not. All they asserted were design patents, which are flimsy little patents drawn to the ornamental design of the product. They're actually a sort of bastard child you'd get from a weird threesome between copyright, trademark and patent laws. You infringe a design patent by selling a product that looks like the patented design. It has nothing to do with the technology. The fact that they sent five (essentially saying, "You're too close to all five of these different ornamental designs") is pretty good evidence that this was just anti-competitive grand standing. They were just hoping that Blue Jeans would see the word "patent" and think $4M litigation and roll over and stop competing.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  6. A shorter answer by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I refer my learnèd friend to the case of Arkell v Pressdram.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:A shorter answer by debrain · · Score: 4, Funny
      Great reference. For those not inclined to click the link ...

      [The plaintiff, Arkell, was the subject of an article relating to illicit payments and so sued the defendant magazine Pressdram. The] magazine had ample evidence to back up the article. Arkell's lawyers wrote a letter in which, unusually, they said: "Our client's attitude to damages will depend on the nature of your reply". The response consisted, in part, of the following: "We would be interested to know what your client's attitude to damages would be if the nature of our reply were as follows: Fuck off".
  7. This is exhibit "A" ..... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... As to why patent reform can't come soon enough.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's not.
      This is someone attempting to bully using the patent system, it is not the fault of the patent system at all.

      I would argue that these kind of people would threaten under some other pretense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Classic Small-Guy Shakedown by mpapet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every small company I've worked for has been shaken down this way.

    Step 1: Giant company sees small company as a real or imagined threat.

    Step 2: Initiate patent or Trademark litigation.

    Step 3: Repeat step 2 until small company is sunk under a mountain of legal bills.

    Step 4: Profit!

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  9. Obligatory... by masdog · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this deserves an "OH SNAP!"

  10. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I'm not defending monster in any way, the information there on the experiment doesn't say what kind of music was played. If it were some rock album with some amount of distortion in the guitars already, then a coat hanger may really be just as good. Playing classical music with long silences over a coat hanger, however, may provide audibly different results than real cabling.

  11. This sounds familiar by arotenbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am evaluating your claim that the connectors on certain Tartan brand products infringe Monster's design patents and trademarks. However, the information supplied with your letter is plainly inadequate to support a claim of infringement and so I am writing to you to ask for further information and clarification regarding your claims.

    I will begin by addressing your trademark/trade dress claim. You have referred to two trademark registrations, and have attached some printouts from the USPTO system but the depiction of the marks on the drawings provided is small and indistinct, making it difficult to determine exactly what the alleged resemblance is, and I need further information from you. This made me laugh. Monster Cable wants to initiate a trademark suit and can't send a legible image of the trademark? Sounds like something SCO would do...
    --
    Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
  12. The world needs more Kurt Denkes by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we need them in a serious way. People who know their stuff, know what the legal system is supposed to be used for, and stand up for themselves in a positive way.

    I hope we see more small companies and individuals do this in the future.

  13. Summary Missed Best Paragraph by iamhigh · · Score: 3, Informative
    I like this one...

    Further, if any of these patents or trademarks has been licensed to any entity, please provide me with copies of the licensing agreements. I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income; my request for these licensing agreements is specifically intended to include any licensing agreements, including those with closely related or sham entities, within or without the Monster Cable "family," and without regard to whether those licensing agreements are sham transactions for tax shelter purposes only or whether they are bona fide arm's-length transactions.
    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  14. Amen, brother, Amen by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When digg first came out, I thought it an incredible improvement on /. as far as getting timely stories, if they would only get nested comments. But then the fanboys hit, duplications made /. look as staid and conservative as the New York Times, and I gave up on digg. Far too much noise for far too little signal.

    And since then, /. has improved immensely. No doubt the competition helped, but I care not where the incentive came from, only that /. gets better and better.

    1. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much. I read Slashdot for the commentary (filtered - who needs Trolls), not the articles.....even when the posts are offtopic (like this thread), they still can be insightful and interesting. If it's a slow news day or I don't want to do any work, Digg gets a little more action....but that's because they post anything.

      Layne

    2. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. /. has more than its fair share of mouthbreathers, but compared to most online forum/blog type things out there, /. reads like de Tocqueville in comparison.

  15. When I was more naive by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I purchased some Monster Cables for my home theater. Now the damn connectors are coming off my speaker wires. I took them apart to find out that connectors are held on by a shoddy crimp job. For what they cost they could at least solder them. The rubber shielding is even starting to deteriorate. Not worth the money.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:When I was more naive by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would suggest getting all of your cables from Blue Jeans Cable from now on. I know I will; Their prices for HDMI cables are almost as low as monoprice's.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  16. Ahhh, that was joyfull by mlwmohawk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have not enjoyed a letter like that in a long while.

    I think I have a new rule, right after "never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!" "Never challenge a former litigator who misses his old job."

  17. What this really points out is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, the real issue here is that every frakking time a large east-coast firm throws up some completely contrived and in this case completely confused claim of infringement, where is the Lawyer that will be able to send something like that on behalf of the poor schmucks that DIDN'T come out of a heavy damage litigation background?

    Does the DOJ need to aggressively treat all patent infringement claims such that the one filing the claim is audited by federal attorneys for relevancy? Should the patent office send out investigators and rip the claim apart before it gets to court?

    I, for one, would be SOL if a company the size of Monster came after me. I can't even START to mount a defense for this kind of thing. I applaud Mr. Denke but at the same time, I have to say that this is a serious lament for the system. You have to be a high-class lawyer to get this crap out of your company's hair.

  18. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by hudsonhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did you in fact read the article you're posting?

    The Consumerist did no such comparison. Rather, a reader sent them a 4 year old post from a random dude on another forum, which the Consumerist quoted and posted, turning it into a popular Slashdot meme.

    Groupthink at work, gotta love it. The burden of proof is always non-existent when it backs up your pre-existing notions of truth.

  19. This is poetry by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only does he completely and thoroughly tear Monster's case apart, he also points out that Monster uses a Bermuda-based company for IP holding to shift income offshore and avoid paying US taxes. Not illegal per se, but also not something Monster would want broadcast.

    Although it may have taken some time to write this he absolutely ensures that Monster will never mess with him again and decreases the chances of Monster going after anyone in a similar fashion. He has done in probably less than a couple of hours what would normally take months of messy litigation.

    This guy is a hero.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  20. Uhm.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't the RCA connector patented by.... oh, I don't know.... RCA?

    1. Re:Uhm.... by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any patents held by RCA would have expired many decades ago. They invented the connector in the 1930s.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  21. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Informative

    read every word of that rather long article, and all I have to say is "OWNED". Wow. Normally I refer from such Internet slang,

    I believe the proper iSlang is PWNED!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  22. Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amusingly, for many years Monster stayed away from the types of cables where quality matters, like VGA cables. VGA cables have a high-bandwidth analog signal, and long (10m or so) VGA cables have transmission-line type problems, where mismatches or crosstalk result in ghosting or blur at the monitor. For short tables, it's not a big deal, but as length increases, it matters. There are lots of crap VGA cables out there. Still, above $15 for 10m, you're overpaying.

    HDMI cables have to carry 340MHz, so they're transmission lines. There's a certification process, and if the cable passed it, it should be OK. There are phony HDMI cables out there that don't pass the spec, but all certified cables should work equally well.

    There's something to be said for gold-plated connectors, especially for something that's frequently unplugged, but the cost of the gold is trivial.

    1. Re:Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually high end cables dont have gold but nickel.

      Gold plated ends are a sham, the gold wears through so fast (because it's barely plated on to begin with) it's not funny and the brass underneath it looks like gold so you dont know. The real high end stuff are solid nickel connections.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. Re:I'll be sure to .. by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Their prices on long lengths of HDMI cables are actually downright reasonable. $38 for 24 gague, 50-feet in your choice of color and connector? That's better than Monoprice...

  24. Porcupine by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like a porcupine, and boy does it growl like a porcupine. Monster Cable Products Inc, would you like to try a bite and see if it tastes like a porcupine?

  25. Calling the bluff by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company has received warnings letters about possible patent infringements on our part. As manager of R&D, I've helped respond to them.

    The main thing to keep in mind is that such patent infringement claims are mostly bluff. Sending a letter to a company claiming patent infringement is a relatively cheap thing to do, and might result in a competitor discontinuing a product or paying a license fee. But responding to such a letter in a coherent, technically competent, and determined manner is often enough for the patent holder to back off. They don't want a legal battle any more than you do.

    Indeed, if you can make a case for prior art then the patent holders will really want to avoid a fight, for such a battle might invalidate their patent.

  26. Expired patent by esocid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm surprised no one spotted his reference to an expired patent that Monster has probably used to threaten other companies.

    Also, please provide me all of the information referenced above as it relates to your expired patent D323643, a copy of which I am attaching. I will need to know what products Monster now offers or at any time has offered for sale which were believed to fall within the scope of D323643, and what claims, if any, of infringement of D323643 were made against others by Monster, whether those claims of infringement took the form of correspondence only, litigation, or otherwise.
    He's pretty much saying did you use this to extort anyone else? If so you will need to return the monies you extorted. Thanks!
    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  27. Looking for a job? by sherpajohn · · Score: 5, Funny
    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
  28. Good cheap cables... by xTK-421x · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just in case anyone doesn't know of them, Monoprice has been my cabling place for years. Good prices, reasonable shipping.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  29. Same sh*t, different company by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

    Bose has been doing this for years as well. It's amazing to me the chasm between the home users who buy the stuff and the true audiophiles and sound engineers who won't touch it. In the long run, I suppose it is all subjective - if it sounds good to you, then your money is well spent. I just take issue with companies using suspicious claims to support their "innovative" technology.
  30. Re:Wow by edremy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to hate all lawyers all the time, then I ran into a mortgage company that tried to screw me out of my house two days before settlement. I spoke with a lawyer for a bit, got some exact words to tell them along with some very specific legal threats, then called the company back.

    The 5 seconds of silence on the other end of the line before the "Uuuh, I think I need to talk to my supervisor" was classic. Took them only a few more minutes before all those horrible problems with my mortgage just vanished.

    Since then I've been a lot more accepting of lawyers- calling down the legal napalm on those assholes was one of the most fun things I've ever done.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  31. blue jeans, good company - by mrcubehead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've bought cables from them before, they always struck me as the perfect antidote to the snake oil industry. This only increases my respect for an already respectable company.

  32. My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by UttBuggly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I loved every word Mr. Denke wrote...freakin' brilliant. Kudos to him for fighting back.

    Two things. I've had some high-powered lawyers across the table from me on 3 occasions and so far, I'm 3-0. There IS an assumption these big firms make along the lines of threaten and terrify people until they give it up. Sadly, that works pretty well...until someone like Mr. Denke comes along and says "wait just a damn minute!"

    In my most "fun" case, I leased a new Jeep Cherokee for business use in 1984. I had it for exactly 35 days, several of which the Jeep spent in the dealer's service department. The thing was a TOTAL lemon. The first time I tapped the horn, the entire button, retaining ring, and spring flew off. The first cassette I popped into the "premium" audio system was eaten so badly the unit broke. Rear window defroster...no electrical connection. And so on. On day 35, I picked the Jeep for the 4th or 5th time...in a month...and discovered they hadn't fixed the latest problem, just ordered parts, and I was to "call every few days to see if the parts have arrived". I walked into the Leasing Manager's office, handed him the keys, notified him I was surrendering the vehicle under the terms and conditions of the lease in the Section for Early Lease Termination. I agreed to pay $900 to get out of the lease as the agreement stated a 6% charge on a 1st year termination. OK, $15,000 Jeep....that's $900. I walked out, got a cab, and bought a Nissan truck the next day.

    A few weeks later, I get served. The leasing company WHOLESALED a new Jeep that had 400 miles of driving on it for $9500 and presented me with the difference...about $6000. And placed an entry with the credit bureaus that I had "defaulted" on a loan. I countersued the dealership, their employee, and the leasing company. We went to deposition...myself and my small-town lawyer...and sat down with about 15 people from the other side. Other than myself and the lady typing, it was all lawyers. The lead guy, "Rudy", did everything but punch me. I smiled, we presented our evidence, and left. In the hall, the dealership lawyers offered to pay the leasing company themselves if I would drop the countersuit against them. In the end, I paid them nothing. They even paid MY attorney. I still smile every day or so about that one.

    2nd thing: Monster cables are NOT very good. I have an extensive background in electronics and have made thousands of cables of every description. I also play bass in a working band and run 3 basses during a big show. I tried a Monster Instrument Cable...at a premium price...and found it to be trash. A handmade "Radio Shack" special worked as well. I now use Planet Waves cutout cables and have never had a problem. In the studio, I'm going straight to the board and listening to the mix with Sennheiser phones and the PW cables sound as good as anything I've made or used. And before the "audiophiles" jump in with the "warm" and "bright" crap, MY former life was as an engineer for a major A/V firm that does work from coast-to-coast. Wire is wire. 12 gauge copper wire in bulk from the hardware store is just as good as the horrendously more expensive Monster Cable stuff. I only use the PW cables for my basses because of the cutout switch makes instrument changes on stage a QUIET snap and I'm too lazy to build my own....yet.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
    1. Re:My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by clarkcox3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To really experience the Monster advantage, you have to run a green magic marker along the wire. I've got one I'll sell for $350 + s/h :)

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  33. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, I read the article; I wouldn't link to it otherwise. If you want more precision, s/the Consumerist's comparison/the comparison posted on the Consumerist/.

    The article gives plenty of detail on their testing methodology, assuming the original poster didn't make it up, and nothing posted on the Internet can easily prove or disprove that possibility. Thus, take it with the same grain of salt you take with everything else on the Internet.

  34. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Groupthink at work, gotta love it. The burden of proof is always non-existent when it backs up your pre-existing notions of truth.

    Prove it.
  35. RTFA by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I actually RTFA, and I must say without reservation that it is completely and totally worth reading the entire thing.

    --

    Question everything

  36. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some quick research suggests wire hangers are 12 gauge and made out of solid steel; what the audio cable industry would call "solid core". Monster is a bit evasive about what's in their Monster Ultra Series THX 1000 speaker cables, saying only "4 large gauge copper conductors"; based on other Monster cable products I'd expect they're 12 or 14 gauge stranded wire.

    I do a fair amount of single-blind speaker cable tests myself, certainly more than this one anecdotal experiment. Differences here are subtle but I've done way too many comparisons with consistent results to think they don't exist. The best results in any listening comparison are always when comparing with music the listener is intimately familiar with, so their test starts out badly in that regard. Generally I prefer the sound of fat solid wire to anything else. People like stranded wire because it's easy to work with, but it doesn't sound as good as a solid wire of the same gauge. Accordingly, I'm unsurprised that they found the solid steel coat hanger wire to be similar to the Monster cable.

    The thing most people miss about that article is that there were two listeners who were cable of hearing the difference between the Monster product and the Belden cable they started with, suggesting there is an audible difference to cables--just not a major difference between the Monster and the hanger. I suspect that further, better tests would show a ranking like this:

    Belden 14AWG Stranded Copper < Monster 1000 ~= 12AWG Solid Steel < 12AWG Solid Copper

    I've had audiophile speaker cables here up to the $1000 price range (but not the expensive Monsters, their stuff is awful per dollar). Nowadays I'm usually happy with some hand twisted pair designs I wired up with 12AWG solid copper purchased from Home Depot. It's certainly superior to the 14AWG stranded cables I made out of an extension cord also purchased there. The extension cord "design" does sound better than most cheap speaker cables, including the budget Monster line; it is good quality copper and almost thick enough.

  37. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by bishiraver · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, nah. It's "Poned." As in, "Ponied." ...PONIES!!!

  38. My favorite quote by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not compromise with bullies and I would rather spend fifty thousand dollars on defense than give you a dollar of unmerited settlement funds. As for signing a licensing agreement for intellectual property which I have not infringed: that will not happen, under any circumstances, whether it makes economic sense or not.

    Bravo. Just fucking bravo.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:My favorite quote by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if Blue Jeans is public, if the shareholders have any brains, they'll support his stance. This isn't just a matter of principle (although it is certainly that) but also a matter of cold hard cash. Blue Jeans will in every way do better by standing up to the aptly-named Monster than they would be settling.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:My favorite quote by morganew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, dwater makes a good point. One of our member companies had a General Counsel who was of the same mindset as Mr. Denke; he wanted to fight weak infringement claims. Unfortunately, as an officer of the company, he was required to lay out the costs for fighting and winning and the costs of just settling. Oftentimes even WINNING could be more expensive than settling if the claimant had no real assets. And then there was the risk of losing.

      So in the end, he had to settle cases he desperately wanted to fight. He was a big part of the reason we got involved in patent reform several years ago.

      Morgan

      --
      A sig?!? I don't think so.....
  39. Fine. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just have Kurt write a letter to them too.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  40. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    When was the last time you heard an elderly gentleman say "get off my yard" in a civil voice to a bunch of rowdy teenagers?!

    I'd be inclined to do so, but punctuate my civil voice with a few shotgun blasts in their general direction.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  41. Re:The whole letter by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Informative


    "You are in possession of at least seven orifices. Your website demonstrates fifteen cables, one of which you may discard. If so, the other fourteen are still under the terms of your retributuion. You will now insert those cables into the orifices in the 1-1-1-1-3-1-7 configuration."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  42. Re:Wow by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Consider legal insurance. I pay about 6 euros per month for it, and with that I can access a hotline which gives immediate access to one of the insurance's lawyers specialized in the covered area. They will first help you solve the matter the cheapest way, without going to court (e.g. by writing a letter or giving advice like the parent poster had). This already saves you a lot of time and money and stress. And if it would go to court, the insurance fee will pay itself back in no time.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  43. FYI - it's Tartan Cable, NOT Blue Jeans... by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although Kurt is the owner of Blue Jeans Cable, I need to remind some of you that Monster is coming after Tartan Cable (which is also owned by Kurt). Tartan cable is Kurt's economy line of cables... it's all "Made in China", it's inexpensive, and by all standards, just as good as any of the other stuff bought at Best Buy or Circuit City - just less money. Blue Jeans Cable sells what is known as broadcast quality cabling. Basically, it's the same stuff you'll find being used by professional broadcast engineers in television studios, radio stations, A/V post production houses, and the like. Yes, it's more expensive than the chinese stuff, but it is mostly Belden Cable and anyone who knows about this stuff will see the value. Yes, for the most part, a lot of what Blue Jeans sells may be considered "overkill" for your run of the mill home theater - that is why the Tartan line of products was introduced. But for those who want what the pros use, Blue Jeans will deliver and not suck your wallet dry in the process.

  44. Resisted the /. effect? by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks to me like these guys either stripped their website down to the barest of bare bones to survive what must be DDoS-level traffic, or they have a really crappy website.

    I'm thinking that those graphics look like they probably fit into a more image-rich site. They've even done away with their style sheet.

    If my guess is right, it shows that these guys are definitely on the ball. Well done! (if not, they really need to do something about that site!)

  45. Patent trolls the same as spammers? by trawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There appears to be a remarkable resemblance between patent trolls and spammers in that they both appear to like sending things like this out to as many people as they can and just playing the numbers. I'm sure Monster have done this before and either gotten the other entity to just roll over and play dead, but really - they can just spam things like this out to as many people as they want and hope that they can get enough of a percentage of success to make it profitable as its own business process.

    Admittedly its more expensive than the near-zero cost of spam, but the principle is the same.

  46. Whew! by pugugly · · Score: 2, Funny

    I might be wrong, but I have no recollection of having ever gotten an erection from reading a legal letter before.

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  47. 30 dollars for a HDMI by BillOfThePecosKind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone go to blue jeans cable website? I don't care if they charge less for an HDMI however 30 dollars is still WAY to much for a 6ft cable in my opinion. I got my 6ft hdmi cables on amazon for $3 and they kick ass. Screw Blue Jeans Cable, they're still trying to rip you off, just not as much.

    1. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an employee of BJC - I'd tell you to buy the Tartan. In fact, if you called us, we'd recommend the MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE Tartan. We only sell those because there are a bunch of folks that "must" have them (i.e. "audiophiles"). Besides, the Series-1 cable you are referring to was originally designed and intended for 1080P resolutions beyond 50 feet. Try buying a 75' HDMI that will handle 1080p anywhere else.... We are not in the "rip off" game. We don't hard-sell anything. As a matter of fact, I'm using one of the Tartan 4 foot 28AWG cables on my Blu-Ray and it works just fine, and hy home system is almost 100% Tartan wired. FYI - I am also a degreed audio engineer of over 18 years who works as a freelance post-production sound editor for film/video, so I just might know a few things about this subject.

    2. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BTW - the main reason that the Series-1 is pricey is the fact that it is an AMERICAN MADE cable. I defy anyone to find an hdmi cable from any other source that isn't manufactured in China. Plus, the bonded pair technology is the only real advance on HDMI construction since it's inception. All of this info is on the website, and NONE of it is snake-oil.

  48. Perfect! by chrispycreeme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just found my new favorite cable company! You can't buy advertising like this, Blue Jeans Cable must be thrilled.

  49. Wow, what a letter! by dwiget001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two things I got from it: 1) You are messing with the wrong guy. 2) I am putting my balls on the table. Go ahead, kick/smash them. I will make sure that the resulting damage hurts you a lot more than it hurts me.

  50. Re:Ace170780 by ^_^x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've actually had some stainless/chromed cable ends (can't say for sure. Probably just shiny stainless) corrode over time. One headphone plug in particular takes on a thin dark grey coating every couple years of regular use.

    So I take a rag with a little metal polish on it, wipe it off, then clean off the polish. Good as new. I've never had a static connection like one on an amp or piece of home theatre equipment corrode on me.

    So you're absolutely right, and in my experience gold is functional but not useful. My favorite cable sham is people selling high-grade shielded, gold-plated connector cables for a home theatre digital signal. Short of being so bad it drops bits, there would literally be no difference in high and low grade - there's really no wiggle room for looking a little better or worse.