Slashdot Mirror


A Walk Through the Hard Drive Recovery Process

Fields writes "It's well known that failed hard drives can be recovered, but few people actually use a recovery service because they're expensive and not always successful. Even fewer people ever get any insights into the process, as recovery companies are secretive about their methods and rarely reveal any more information that is necessary for billing. Geek.com has an article walking through a drive recovery handled by DriveSavers. The recovery team did not give away many secrets, but they did reveal a number of insights into the process. From the article, "'[M]y drive failed in about every way you can imagine. It had electro-mechanical failure resulting in severe media damage. Seagate considered it dead, but I didn't give up. It's actually pretty amazing that they were able to recover nearly all of the data. Of course, they had to do some rebuilding, but that's what you expect when you send it to the ER for hard drives.'" Be sure to visit the Museum of Disk-asters, too.

238 comments

  1. Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A hard drive shaped freezer.

    1. Re:Their secret revealed... by iMaple · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's actually not to far away from a working solution. You can normally make a failing/failed harddisk work for around 5 minutes by freezing it and then immediately using it. Don't try to boot off it, just connect it as an external drive and you can probably get that code you were working on before the drive failed. Its worked for me all 3 times I've tried.

    2. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That only works if you have "engineers wearing specialized, certified cleanroom garments" that place the drive in the freezer. And don't forget to charge $1500.

    3. Re:Their secret revealed... by mikael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That worked for me - I recovered an entire hard disk drive (Hitachi Travelstar) using the freeze and sudden twist method. Basically you freeze the hard disk drive to get whatever it is that sticks, to become brittle, and then give the drive a sudden twist to free the platters. This will last as long as the drive motor keeps running. Blogosphere theory is that it is the oil from the platter bearings that leaks and hardens.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Their secret revealed... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I had a hard drive that were going dead. Reporting bad sectors all over the place. Then I recovered what data I could, and then used dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb. And then I did dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdb. After that I formatted the drive and it worked fine. This worked on two drives that failed within a year of eachother, and I've been using them for at least 2 years. I'm not sure how it fixed anything, but it seemed to work for me.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Their secret revealed... by AgTiger · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had a primary hard drive fail in a linux file server I have at the house. The backup hadn't been taken in a while (yeah, I got lazy), and I really needed the updated files.

      A friend of mine told me this method, so I tried it; it worked. I got more than 30 minutes of operation out of the drive, enough to pull ALL of the files off (30 gigs of data) successfully.

      1. Put masking tape over the data and electrical connectors of the drive.
      2. Immerse the drive in a ziplock bag of minute-rice, with the data/power connectors sticking up. This can't be regular rice, it MUST be minute rice. This acts as a poor man's silica gel later in the process. Close the zip-lock.
      3. Freeze the bag of rice with the hard drive in it in the deep freeze for 24 hours. You want it completely frozen, patience is a virtue.
      4. Remove the bag from the freezer, and take it to a pre-prepared computer where the drive is ready to be received and plugged in (longer data cable, longer power cable, etc...) You should have another big data drive in the system ready to receive the data from the frozen drive.
      5. Leave the drive immersed in the minute rice except for the data/power connector. Remove the tape. Plug in the data and power cables. Try to re-seal the zip-lock bag as much as possible so you don't have rice grains escaping.
      6. Orient the drive so it's laying in as natural of a position as possible with as much frozen rice around it.
      7. Fire up the system, and try to access the frozen drive. This is the moment of truth. If you're lucky, it'll identify and respond, and you'll have access to the file system.
      8. You now about 20 reliable minutes to copy data. You may get more if you're lucky. Copy copy copy. Note: The drive WILL be slow at first, and will speed up as it starts to warm.

      Why the minute rice? It performs two functions: First, it keeps the moisture from condensing on, and in the drive's metal parts. Moisture's the killer when you power up a frozen drive. Second, it provides an additional thermal block of "cool" to help keep the drive at a lower temperature while you perform the copy.

      After I got the data, I scrapped the original drive I froze (literally, out came the platters and they sit in my stack of platter-shame.) No sense courting disaster a second time.

      I've since used this method 2 more times successfully with other people's hard drives. I suspect the recovery specialists use a similar trick, only they'd be smart to use a sub-zero frozen room with no moisture to do their "cold start and copy" process.

    6. Re:Their secret revealed... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can normally make a failing/failed harddisk work for around 5 minutes by freezing it and then immediately using it.
      It only works for a certain kind of broken hard drive. Fortunately, these kinds of breaks, due to poor workmanship, account for around 40-50% of failures! Hurrah!
    7. Re:Their secret revealed... by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't get freezing to work on my dead drive. The trick that worked was: Let sit on the desk for two months and then try it again. It still made noise, but it worked long enough to find and retrieve the files that weren't backed up.

    8. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like my NES cartridges.

    9. Re:Their secret revealed... by turing_m · · Score: 4, Informative

      A better version of the poor man's silica gel is crystalline kitty litter (which is just rebranded silica gel).

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    10. Re:Their secret revealed... by Snover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All modern disks ship with some unused spare sectors that are used to remap onto failed sectors. This occurs all inside the drive's firmware, so even though the computer thinks it's addressing the same sector, in actuality the drive is pulling data from the remapped spare. The firmware is smart enough to only remap sectors when you try to write to a bad one, though, because if it decided to remap a bad sector that had data on it that you needed, you'd not be able to get back that data even if the disk was eventually able to read the sector.

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    11. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The recovery team did not give away many secrets, but they did reveal a number of insights into the process

      Idiot sends his drive to a recovery company and writes a blog entry about it, somehow it makes the front page of Slashdot? There is nothing in the writeup not available on the website of any of these companies, including "cleanroom" nonsense.

    12. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spinrite costs a whole lot less and uses the science builtin the disks to get the data back....

      http://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm

    13. Re:Their secret revealed... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in my case, the drive was reporting 20% bad sectors, in any of the utilities I tried. There's no way it could have remapped all those sectors. It seems that forcing the computer to write over the entire disc caused the head to get reset or something. I'm not sure why it worked, multiple times, but I have no complaints. I don't keep anything really critical on the drives, but it's a nice place to through stuff that I don't care if I lose.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re:Their secret revealed... by mortonda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had a primary hard drive fail in a linux file server I have at the house. The backup hadn't been taken in a while (yeah, I got lazy), and I really needed the updated files. Which is why backup solutions must be automatic
    15. Re:Their secret revealed... by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      a very insightful comment (don't have mod points today)

      I use sync-back on my windows laptop at work. Copy key files to the NAS, which is then automatically backed up every night. So for some stuff of mine, there are 3 copies at any one time.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    16. Re:Their secret revealed... by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The entire article reads like an advertisement for the company. This is pretty piss poor quality for a Slashdot article.

    17. Re:Their secret revealed... by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Second, it provides an additional thermal block of "cool" to help keep the drive at a lower temperature while you perform the copy.

      I suspect the recovery specialists use a similar trick, only they'd be smart to use a sub-zero frozen room with no moisture to do their "cold start and copy" process.
      I've never had to do this, but your method gave me an idea-- Why not sandwich the drive assembly (drive, rice, and bag) in-between 2 blocks of dry ice? That way, the drive would stay freezing cold even longer and buy more time.
      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    18. Re:Their secret revealed... by try_anything · · Score: 1

      Spinrite costs a whole lot less and uses the science builtin the disks to get the data back Dammit, I thought the "science" option was just a rip-off. I insisted on buying all non-science drives, and if anything fails now I guess I'm screwed.
    19. Re:Their secret revealed... by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're better off plugging directly into a computer rather than using an external USB/Firewire adapter. In my experience anyway those adapters tend to give up the first time you run into a bad sector but if you plug in directly you can use tools such as dd_rescue to keep trying until you've recovered every scrap of data possible.

    20. Re:Their secret revealed... by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      I use sync-back on my windows laptop at work. Copy key files to the NAS, What the fuck is automatic about that?

      which is then automatically backed up every night. So for some stuff of mine, there are 3 copies at any one time. But only one if you don't remember to back up in the first place? Nice solution.
      --
      i forget
    21. Re:Their secret revealed... by tunapez · · Score: 1

      Wish I knew this info Friday. Just got back in town at midnight Thursday, was up at 7 getting ready to transfer 100+gb of back-ups to my file server when the puppy jumped up. The drive was on the table outside the case, she managed to pull the sata plugs out(too bad it wasn't an IDE) and send it 3'to the carpeted floor as I was navigating to my destination folder! After hearing it click and scratch I froze it for 2 hours. Nothing. Tried to open it but 2 heads stripped and by the time I drilled the heads the insides were ruined, coated w/ metal dust. Luckily they were just images of fresh installs and not unique data, but still, my heart broke in a terabyte of pieces.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    22. Re:Their secret revealed... by value_added · · Score: 1

      2. Immerse the drive in a ziplock bag of minute-rice, with the data/power connectors sticking up.

      So what do I do with the rice when the data is recovered from the failed drive?

    23. Re:Their secret revealed... by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

      Dumb question, but why even take the drive out of the freezer? Is there something that prohibits you from just getting a long cable and placing your computer near the freezer as you grab all the data?

    24. Re:Their secret revealed... by lostguru · · Score: 1

      have a wedding

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    25. Re:Their secret revealed... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Tried to open the hard disk? WTF?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    26. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your data recovery idea was to take a drill to the drive? WTFBBQ????

    27. Re:Their secret revealed... by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      You must be new here...

      --

      Your head a splode
    28. Re:Their secret revealed... by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      I've done this but without the freezing part.
      My main drive at work eight years ago had bearings that was a bit worn.
      Enough that the drive wouldn't spin up after being powered down.
      Every time the power had been off, I had to remove the drive and give it a twist to get it running.
      Ran it like this for almost two years. ^_^ (I was to lazy to re-install my workstation.)

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    29. Re:Their secret revealed... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Honestly. If you've got some data you really don't care about ever seeing again, just save it onto a DVD-minus-R.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    30. Re:Their secret revealed... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      It should still be fine to eat, if you cook it up the same day.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    31. Re:Their secret revealed... by muffel · · Score: 1

      Remove the bag from the freezer, and take it to a pre-prepared computer ...
      Actually, you might want to pre-prepare it in advance for even better results.
      --

      bla
    32. Re:Their secret revealed... by nonewmsgs · · Score: 1

      like 24 bytes/1000kb to make that 1024?

    33. Re:Their secret revealed... by nonewmsgs · · Score: 1

      but can it be handled if someone put that 4pin pata powercable in upside down?

    34. Re:Their secret revealed... by Dekortage · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried Drivesavers once in the distant past. $1200 later, they hadn't recovered more than a megabyte of data off of an 40gb server drive -- and it was all OS files, none of the actual data files we wanted. They claimed the files were too fragmented on the drive, and the failure was too extreme, that nothing else could be recovered. I doubted this because the server ran a defragging routine during downtime.

      But it taught me a lesson. I had been on vacation for a couple of weeks, leaving the tape backup system in the hands of someone else. They dutifully swapped tapes on schedule, but never checked the console to determine that the tapes were full and needed to be replaced with new (or newly-erased) tapes. So for six days, no tape backups occurred -- and of course, that department just happened to do a lot of valuable work during that time because it was approaching a deadline. That team valued the work at over $50K. *sigh* After that, I overhauled that server to include RAID, plus a secondary server which cloned all the data from the first server nightly, plus put an autoloader on the tape drive.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    35. Re:Their secret revealed... by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a nice solution. Sync-back is a program that can have any number of tasks configured to automatically back up directories from one location to another, doing so at a time and an interval pre-selected by the user (me).

      So, to answer your question, everything about it is automatic.

      Sorry if I wasn't totally clear, I'll try better next time.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    36. Re:Their secret revealed... by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      *In Ghostly voice reminiscent of Field of Dreams* "If you blow in them Ray... They will work"

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    37. Re:Their secret revealed... by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Yep, worked for me too many times, about 75% of the time I would say. Just put it in the freezer for about 2 hours in a zip lock freezer bag (1 hour gets you 2-4 minutes, 2 hours gets you about 7-10). Dont bother putting it in bios, that is a waste of boot time (as it tends to probe it too much), just say no drive is there in the bios. Boot on linux based system and have this one in as a second drive (replace the cdrom drive or the like), mount the dying drive under /mnt and copy what you need to the linux filesystem. I normally go for Documents\ and\ Settings first as it contains the My Documents and the like for all users, and perhaps other things after. Once you do get what you want on your good linux drive, you have all the time in the world to pick through the data. If you plan to refreeze, do it quickly before the condensation causes too much damage, I'd say freeze for 2 hours, access it for 7 minutes, freeze again immediantly for 2 hours, then get another 7 minutes.

      I usually have all my data on the first freeze, but I do a ls -lR > /tmp/listing.txt of the drive when its first hooked up in a second console, when I am done and then do a refreeze anyway and while its feezing I look over my listing I made on the linux system to see if I missed anything I might want/need.

      Why do I use linux...well for one thing linux don't give up on retries as fast as windows, and it boots faster, so you have more time to get files off.

    38. Re:Their secret revealed... by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

      A manager's drive died after having a waterfall in his office from the roofing guys leaving holes in the roof from their anchors.
      There is a walk in freezer that would have been perfect, but my boss thought freezing was a joke and wouldn't work after sending it off to some guy that tried software recovery.

    39. Re:Their secret revealed... by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why bother, when /dev/null is so handy and quick?

    40. Re:Their secret revealed... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      Its worked for me all 3 times I've tried.

      You've had to do this *three* times? What's not working in your backup system? Once I hit #2 I'd be on RAID for sure...

    41. Re:Their secret revealed... by dougmc · · Score: 1

      By `normally' you mean `sometimes'. It works sometimes. Not most of the time or even half of the time. But it's certainly worth a try.

    42. Re:Their secret revealed... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Probably. Just find another identical drive (brand, model, and size) and swap the circuit boards around.

      Of course, this is more likely to be feasible in a work setting, where drives are typically purchased in batches. Most home users probably won't have pairs of identical drives lying around.

    43. Re:Their secret revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save it dude! Rice is soooo expensive. $1/kilo? I'm not made of money!

    44. Re:Their secret revealed... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      have a wedding Daughter: Dad, I'm getting married!
      Dad: Great and about time! I got a backlog of several drives waiting...
    45. Re:Their secret revealed... by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because /dev/null can get full, if you put too many ones into it! Then you have to dd /dev/zero into it to balance it out. The zeros and ones end up annihilating one another and the cosmic balance is restored.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    46. Re:Their secret revealed... by iMaple · · Score: 1

      RAID is not a 'backup' solution. Just get a huge hardisk and set up automated backups. RAID is nice to get a performance boost/have a high uptime. For example RAID can be useless if ur RAID controller fails (I know you can theoretically replace that, its much more difficult than it sounds)

      And I do backups :). (though not all my family does, and the harddisks werent mine)

    47. Re:Their secret revealed... by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. If your drives fail, just send them to Professor Farnsworth, and he'll science them as fast as he can.

    48. Re:Their secret revealed... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      OTOH, some HDs will not work, or at least won't spit up data, unless they're at operating temperature. I recently noticed this with two (modern) HDs in my media server -- it had been sitting idle for a while so had powered off its HDs. Meanwhile the room got cold, down to about 55F degrees. The HDs refused to power back up until I got it warmed up in here, above 60F or so.

      Back in the olden days of the 286, my test rig had a 20 meg W.D. IDE hard drive. And my test rig lived out in an unheated shed. When I'd drag it out on a 35F degree morning, it would take about 10 minutes for the HD to get warm enough to agree to be detected, and another 10 minutes before it would boot.

      I still have that ancient HD (dated 1991) and it still works 100% perfect. Useful as tits on a boar, but a fine specimen for my computer museum. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    49. Re:Their secret revealed... by conureman · · Score: 1

      "Why not sandwich the drive assembly (drive, rice, and bag) in-between 2 blocks of dry ice? That way, the drive would stay freezing cold even longer and buy more time."

      I had the same idea, then thought perhaps 20 minutes was long enough to introduce thermal failure anyhow. I don't like to let my drives get very hot, and IMNSHO thats why I've not lost one yet. (Out of 25 or so, I'm just an amateur.) BTW the only HDD failure I've personally dealt with, apparently when one of my buddies encountered a (Win98) BSOD, he succumbed to the moment and kicked his box. Old 10 Gig Toshiba, not G-rated for that duty. Needless to say, what I found was that all was A-OK except the "NO HDD FOUND" thing. New HDD & install, ("What,... you didn't back up?...) & I'm a hero- "Look Ma! it's got 30 Gigabytes of RAM!" (sic). Of course,none of his wife's recipes &c. merited a recovery event.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    50. Re:Their secret revealed... by drdrperry · · Score: 1

      I wonder how well it works with shattered drives? The following is from a book on where the White House emails have gone.

      "This is what the inside of the drive looked like. The platters were completely shattered. I'd never seen anything like it before in my life."

      http://www.emailsgone.com/resources/fig3-1.jpg

      Note: disk, as in the disk of my mail server, is singular. Anyone spell RAID?

  2. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's well known that failed hard drives can be recovered"

    [Citation Needed]

    1. Re:Summary by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and by means no one would have ever thought of!

      $1500 and they don't even give you a new hard drive. How long can it really take to swap out a set of platters?

      --
      The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
    2. Re:Summary by pagen_hd · · Score: 1

      (a poem)

      Anonymous Coward requesting citations
      and nobody replies.
      Except me. O_o

  3. Hmmm. by vancondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cost for recovering data from a drive with severe media damage, like mine, is about $1900. An average single drive data recovery costs about $1500.


    Wouldn't backing your data up be cheaper?

    --
    http://vancouvercondo.info
    --
    -
    1. Re:Hmmm. by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, if you manage to do it pre-disaster. Afterwards, well, you learn an expensive lesson about doing backups.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    2. Re:Hmmm. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Amazingly, my company has learned that lesson twice. If I weren't working part time then I would probably have noticed that they had added extra areas to their file server that weren't on the backup list. RAID arrays are not cheap to recover :(

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Hmmm. by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you manage to do it pre-disaster. Afterwards, well, you learn an expensive lesson about doing backups. I learnt that lesson. Worse still I learnt that (at least in Australia) Apple won't let you keep your fried hard drive when they replace it under warranty. By the time I found out they had already sent it overseas to the manufacturer.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    4. Re:Hmmm. by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note: I am now working there full time (while I was part time a couple of engineers were mostly responsible for IT support and I was doing coding, but now I basically take care of everything - one of the general office workers thankfully takes care of a lot of the easier IT support stuff while I *coughwastetimeon/.* code), and as well as the tape backup, I decided to hook up an external SATA HD on the fileserver that works as an extra backup each night, and makes recoveries a bit quicker than using the last tape if someone comes to me the same day that they lost their file, as well as meaning we have something quick and dirty in place to connect to another server if the fileserver server develops any major issues. A properly scheduled and maintained backup system is truly a thing of beauty :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Hmmm. by Sanat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is a good point about not listing everything that requires backing up.

      I was on a customer's site one day in Detroit showing a new engineer about installing a mini-computer from the company we were working for at the time.

      On another mini-computer located about 50 feet away a customer did a sector by sector backup to another disk and in the process copied the wrong way and lost all of their information that represented two years work.

      He immediately panicked and looked around to see who he could blame the error on and decided to blame us... it was really pathetic because the other workers there knew he did it but he could not bring himself to admit it.

      We finished the installation and left so I never did here what happened to him.

      He was a doctor that specialized in bone deterioration and apparently the data could not be reproduced or re-keyed for some reason.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    6. Re:Hmmm. by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A properly scheduled and maintained backup system is truly a thing of beauty :)
      That's the geekiest thing I've read today. ;)
    7. Re:Hmmm. by sdnoob · · Score: 0

      ...has learned that lesson twice... TWICE? once should have been more than enough.
    8. Re:Hmmm. by mikael · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The cost of an external 250GB USB hard drive is around $160, so it's a lot cheaper to just do a quick 'tar' every day.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Hmmm. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't backing your data up be cheaper?

      Absolutely, just like wearing a condom is cheaper than having a baby but sometimes don't take all necessary precautions.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Hmmm. by Thirdsin · · Score: 1

      FYI, Here is a related slashvertisement (sry). Staples offers data recovery services in partnership with Seagate. In this person's case for a physical failure it would be a flat fee $1,500. If the data is recovered, it is sent back in an external hard drive. If the data cannot be recovered there is no charge, period. RAID configs unfortunately do not fall under this flat pricing.

      --
      No words of wisedom here.
    11. Re:Hmmm. by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      under 90usd now for a 2.5" WD in a case, rsync is my choice

    12. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That policy (and it noting being IT dept. serviceable) is keeping their hardware out of many larger companies.

    13. Re:Hmmm. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      Of course, I have had clients that after telling them to backup, lost drives and paid $3200 for the data from a 200gb drive, they HAD TO HAVE IT, so they paid DriveSavers their exorbitant fee.

      Some people need to learn, others need to learn more than once. 'Oh so THAT'S what you meant?' :)

      Remember, you just can't fix stupid.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    14. Re:Hmmm. by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Until one day you find the files you're taring are corrupt...

    15. Re:Hmmm. by mortonda · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah young love. ;)

      Yes, once a geek discovers the beauty of a good backup system, he/she has stepped into a new world.

      My backup/archive server is my most lovingly maintained system. It has saved me several times, and recently had to go through a hard drive replacement. That had me nervous.

    16. Re:Hmmm. by prestomation · · Score: 1

      Just today I ordered a 500gb "Fantom Titanium"(better reviews then the seagate and WD), for $110 shipped, Plus a $20 rebate.

    17. Re:Hmmm. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Backups aren't always possible. Say, collecting data, if you back up 1/day you still lose data. That can sometimes be worth the $2k.
      Until you remember the existence of mirroring.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    18. Re:Hmmm. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I had a huge failure in the past (reasons still unknown - all anyone can come up with is MAYBE an EMP issue as even drives not powered up lost their data). Since then I've followed the idea of tertiary redundancy... Not only do I keep backups but I also try to keep a copy of said backups over at my parent's house just in case my home should burn down. I may, should that happen, lose a few weeks worth of data (which sucks) but I'll at least have the remainder of spam, downloaded applications for the third time, and temporary internet files. Go me!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My story....

      Yes, backing up is cheaper. However, if data corruption hadn't started 2 weeks prior, emergency recovery wouldn't have been necessary.

      And yes. The backups for the previous 2 weeks, of which nearly all were corrupt, were of litle use in the scheme of things. It did cost $6,000~ to get 120GB~'s of data off the failed notebook drive, 95~% recovery if I remember. but when the person in question was about to speak to U.S. Congressional committees, money is really no object. And that was in under 48 hours.

      Color me impressed. Then again, its $6000.

    20. Re:Hmmm. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Buffalo NAS or similar, backed up automatically to a USB HDD plugged into the back of it, and something like sync-back to automatically copy stuff over to the NAS. Sync-back is either free or has a free version, the NAS might be $200, and the HDD can be found for $100. So yeah, $300 is WAY cheaper than $1500, and you got a backup with a backup of that.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    21. Re:Hmmm. by Keruo · · Score: 1

      .. if someone comes to me the same day that they lost their file ..

      I restore the file instantly from shadow copy.

      If your fileserver is running linux, you can use Stackable VFS to achieve same thing.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    22. Re:Hmmm. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the one time I've seen data recovery done on a hdd was dept of forrestry research project at OSU - they had a laptop that was taken to South America to gather data - on the way back something happened and it no-longer read the data off the disk. They sent the drive off to ontrack to recover it because it was cheaper than going back down collect more data.

      It was a good long while ago (120 meg hdd as I recall) and I'm leaving out a lot of details I know, but its a good example where backups are kind hard to do. This was back when having an internet connection was a novelty - granted they could have lugged around floppy disks I suppose.

    23. Re:Hmmm. by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Backups aren't always possible. Say, collecting data, if you back up 1/day you still lose data. That can sometimes be worth the $2k. Until you remember the existence of mirroring.

      And mirrored data that is accidently rm -rf, wrongly changed, or on drives that all fail, is worth how much?

      Some sort of RAID is always a good idea, but that's a different subject. Put another way, backups are always possible. Or better yet, mirroring is not a substitute for backups.

    24. Re:Hmmm. by fastgood · · Score: 1

      That's the geekiest thing I've read today. ;)
      2 + 2 = 5 for large values of 2
    25. Re:Hmmm. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, the previous model we were using was running Linux, and the current one is something like Windows 2003 Storage Edition. I haven't looked into the built in Windows backup solutions, I tend to just disable system restore and such features. I still think that keeping a regular copy of the whole RAID system on a single disk is a good idea, as they are *much* cheaper to recover in case of a disaster. we have offsite tape backups but you never know, what if the tape drive dies for example. We could probably find one to borrow in a few hours, but having the extra redundancy is nice.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    26. Re:Hmmm. by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on how many hdd you have, and how often they break. If they only break 1 in a 1000, then you may be better of just using this solution.

      Of course, you aren't because there are other problems that backing up solve, but still..

    27. Re:Hmmm. by donaldm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't backing your data up be cheaper? Your stating the logical thing to do but unfortunately most people have no idea how to backup their data and many that do could not be bothered living in denial as to the reliability of cheap disks. People like this only complain when the disk fails especially when it costs $1500 for a partial recovery which could have brought an acceptable backup solution in the first place and still have change to buy a nice stereo system for your PC and possibly a 20"+ LCD monitor (my son did this for well under $1000).

      Actually the cheapest solution for the home requires backup disks that are equal or greater in size to the data they backup (my current solution). This is a viable solution but you are definately subject to physical disasters such as fire and theft, still that is the chance you sometimes take for convience. Tapes are actually better but they start to get expensive however they are easy to put off-site (gets around the fire and theft issue). The same is true with DVD or Bluray disks but when you are trying to backup terra-bytes this can also get expensive and inconvenient.

      What is even worse are companies who have little if any backup strategies and there are quite a few of them. Some companies pay considerable amounts of money to do backups but many don't do any disaster recovery planing so when a disaster happens (and it will) the losses to the company due to downtime can be quite high, sometimes millions of dollars in lost revenue due to a recovery outage.

      Personally a backup solution which also includes disaster recovery should reflect what you perceive your data is worth.
      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    28. Re:Hmmm. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yep, but it wasn't. The first time the problem was that when they got their new fileserver, they kept some stuff on the old one, but were no longer backing it up. The second, everything was on the new fileserver, but they had created a temporary area just for one contractor, and forgot to add it to the backup list. I wasn't involved in setting the guy up but I probably should have double checked what they had done rather than assuming they knew what they were doing.

      Personally I would have just created him his own folder inside the Engineers' Research folder, but for some reason they just created an entirely new network share that was completely separate from that area - case of a little knowledge being dangerous I guess. The guy that setup the area for the new contractor was basically the main IT guy (though his primary job function was as a design engineer - he was just filling in the gap left because the previous full time IT staffer had left) in the year or so before I started full time, so I thought he'd do things 'properly'.. never assume!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    29. Re:Hmmm. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I use at work pdumpfs daily at work. I can keep 2 weeks worth, and have a non-writable share called "BACKUPS" for people to get files from an accidental rm -rf.

      And something such as timevault or flyback could be used to also provide hourly backups (though you will need some GUI software on your server to set them up).

      I'm sure a real administrator could come up with a script on their own too.

      rdiff-backup is real nice too, but does not allow for a browsable structure to recover older files, so I went with pdumpfs.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    30. Re:Hmmm. by mortonda · · Score: 1

      yeah, that's my next step. I need more bandwidth so I can trickle updates over the net.

    31. Re:Hmmm. by afidel · · Score: 1

      If you're running Windows 2003 then turn on volume shadow copies and let the users restore their own files, saves a lot of needless work.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    32. Re:Hmmm. by nddlc · · Score: 1

      It costs a hell of a lot less to just go over to grc.com and get a copy of spinrite 6. It's non-destructive in nature, and then, if spinrite says it can't recover your data send it to the big bucks guys if you Really Really Really want your data. I find it much simpler just to rsync my /home partition with a 750GB USB drive from time to time.

  4. If you need this service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you fucked up your backups...or you don't have one...or you don't give a shit - which is my issue. If it's important I have a piece of paper, an electronic backup, and another electronic backup somewhere else...and then some...

  5. This may be a dumb question... by TomRK1089 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but are flash drives prone to the same sort of catastrophic failures disc drives are? And are the same recovery techniques workable with both? My gut tells me it's not nearly that simple.

    1. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IME flash drives don't fail catastrophically, they go bad one part at a time, and generally only writes fail, you can still read without problem. I've seen a few drives fail all together, but they stopped registering as USB devices all together. The same recovery techniques can be used, and they need not be expensive. There's MagicRescue, and foremost that kick absolute ass. Free recovery software rawks.

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    2. Re:This may be a dumb question... by TomRK1089 · · Score: 1

      All right, thanks for the info mate. :D

    3. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And likewise, if you have data you need to get rid of, how easy/hard (compared to magnetic HDDs) is it to permanently blast data off a flash drive if you don't want the data found?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      I am not an expert in these matters, but from what I understand, they're completely different. Flash drives can only do so many read/write cycles, after which they fail. Also, if e.g. they go through the wash, there's nothing you can do--the stored charges are gone. If you're just talking about damaged filesystems, that sort of data should be recoverable. The idea of load leveling seems like it would make it easier to recover old data, and generally delete operations don't wipe out all of the file information, so as long as there isn't a hardware issue, I would suspect that it would be about the same degree of difficulty with any other storage technology.

      But I don't know a whole lot about this matter, so someone may need to correct me on this.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    5. Re:This may be a dumb question... by TomRK1089 · · Score: 1

      Ironically, the reason I asked is because a flash drive of mine -- one of the thumb-sized ones -- did go through the wash, and while it still worked afterwards I was curious what I could have done if it hadn't.

    6. Re:This may be a dumb question... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Then how do you explain the failed sticks I have in front of me? HINT - if the controller circuity fails the data is in most cases gone.

    7. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would have bothered to read parents post, he point out that he seen a few fail, but that they stop working all together and arent even recognized when you plug them in. IC less likely to fail than flash itself.

    8. Re:This may be a dumb question... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 3, Funny

      how easy/hard (compared to magnetic HDDs) is it to permanently blast data off a flash drive if you don't want the data found? Much easier - 10 minutes with a mortar and pestle pretty much guarantees recovery will be impossible. That method would take a lot longer (and require more equipment) for hard drives.

      Assuming, of course, that if hiding the data is that important, the cost of a flash drive is a sacrifice you're willing to make. ;)

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    9. Re:This may be a dumb question... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Informative
      HINT - if the controller circuity fails the data is in most cases gone.

      Have a look at this photograph.

      The chip on the left is memory. That's where your data hides. The chip on the right is the memory controller. If that chip fails, but the memory chip is intact, your data may be recoverable.

      Surface mount chips are hard, but not impossible to swap out.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    10. Re:This may be a dumb question... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have two otherwise nearly identical Lexar Jumpdrives from between 6 and 8 years ago, one of which was purchased following the other one having spent some time in a pants pocket during which said pants were both washed and dried, and one of which is now pretty finnicky. But strangely, the good one is the one that went through the wash. If only I'd checked it before driving to Best Buy...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:This may be a dumb question... by piojo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I accidentally dropped a flash drive in some espresso, and held it under the sink to rinse it out. After I dried it, it continued to work without loss of data. (I believe the drive did have water inside it.) Another time, my dad lost a flash drive. We discovered it that spring when the snow it was under melted. It worked fine after it dried (though I don't remember whether the data was still there).

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    12. Re:This may be a dumb question... by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apparently not. The flash array is in the middle of a silicon die and protected with a layer of oxide and epoxy. The pins that come out of the chip packages go directly to some control circuitry and not the flash cells themselves. The flash cells are isolated unless the control circuitry actively tries to read them. So if you were to short all of the pins on the flash chip with the power off the data will still be intact.

      If you do put your flash drive through the washer / pool / toilet you should try to soak it in distilled (not deionized or spring) water for a while and then let it dry on a windowsill for a few days. As long as you don't plug it in until it dries it should work just like new. This is the same process used during manufacture of most PC boards with water soluble flux, so it's likely that your drive has already been dunked anyway.

    13. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not so much these days. A lot of hard drive use glass platters now. Much better temperature stability and, as it turns out, breakability.

      For me the procedure is thus:

      Undo hard drive screws
      Go out back door into alleyway carrying freshly opened drive, brush & shovel and $10 hammer
      Place hard drive on ground
      Tap hard drive with hammer at arms length
      Look away
      Wallop hard drive with hammer
      Gather up 1mm shards of glass with brush and shovel
      Dump now platterless disk in dumpster along with contents of brush and shovel

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:This may be a dumb question... by camperslo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The same recovery techniques can be used, and they need not be expensive.

      Not really. Software tools such as the one you mentioned, Magic Rescue, are for dealing with deleted files or corrupt file systems. That applies to both flash and magnetic drives.
      But for it to work on a magnetic drive, the drive pretty much has to be functional electrically and mechanically. Most drives like that would work after reformatting.
      For that software to work, the interface to the computer has to work, the spindle servo has to work, the head positioning system has to work, the heads have to be okay and have a working connection, and at least the read electronics has to work. A drive isn't really very dead if software can control it and read from it.

      A failure of some part of the drive hardware is likely to require repair or substitution of what's broken. I was disappointed that the article provided almost NO useful details on that.

      If the electronics has failed, substituting the circuit board from another drive of the same type seems like one thing that would be relatively easy.
      Those in the know should easily be able to tell if a head or connecting cable has become open-circuited. I suspect that cracked copper in the head flex cable is a fairly common problem. It is likely the as it first fails, a connection is lost more towards one end or the other of head travel. If one can run the electronics in a sort of diagnostic mode (to avoid aborting on errors), I suspect that a bit for bit copy can be attempted by physical location. That's likely what they're talking about when they mention making an image to recover from.

      If the heads/cables are trashed and not easily repaired in place, swapping the platters into another drive (after removing any debris) is one of the more extreme measures.

      There are probably alternate test-jig type fixtures available to substitute for normal drive electronics. I wouldn't be surprised if the most extreme tools allowed varying read-head preamp parameters and finely adjusting head positioning parameters.

      It's kind of sad that so much information is unavailable to most of us. With full schematics, details of drive firmware etc a skilled technician can do component level repairs. People used to laugh at tv repairmen when sets came along where they'd just swap individual circuit boards instead of finding the bad component. But that's the sort of thing we now see most of the time with our computers and consumer electronics, if they get "fixed" at all. Most of the so called repair people know very little about electronics. It's understandable that the low replacement cost of much electronics has made labor-intensive repairs cost prohibitive, but I'd still like to see schematics available for everything.

      It's sad that we've not only lost the majority of manufacturing jobs, but much of the service side too as a result of the "if it breaks buy a new one" way of doing things.

    15. Re:This may be a dumb question... by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      your right about magicrescue. I had a USB stick fail with a fair bit of important data on it but magicrescue managed to salvage pretty much everything on the drive. Shame it can't do PDFs though; but I would recomend it to anyone

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    16. Re:This may be a dumb question... by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

      Actually it can, because it uses magic numbers to identify files. The beginning of every PDF file starts with "%PDF-", so all you need to do is make a recipe to find it. Recipe guide

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    17. Re:This may be a dumb question... by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Surface mount chips are hard as in "you need to have some soldering experience" hard. It's orders of magnitude easier than HDD surgery, which requires a clean room and a lot of skill. Anyone can swap SMT chips at home with a rework station (or a heat gun in a pinch), a passable soldering iron, and some solder wick.

    18. Re:This may be a dumb question... by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily true. You just need to locate another identical flash drive, and swap over the memory chip (the one with two rows of pins spaced stupidly wide apart). Be careful with the unsoldering and soldering, for fear of ripping the tracks off the board -- these devices tend to be built on FR4, which is not renowned for its copper-to-substrate adhesion. Use plenty of flux (if you can breathe, then you aren't using enough).

      It still might not work if the controller failure took out the flash memory with it, but in practice this is rare.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    19. Re:This may be a dumb question... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      There is no practical difference between deionised and distilled water. The former is usually cheaper, since a deioniser can't be repurposed for purifying other things besides water and so doesn't make your premises subject to periodic inspections.

      Air-conditioner runoff is also free of soluble minerals; but, never having been heated above room temperature, it is quite likely to contain bacteria and/or fungal spores. Boil it before using it to wash anything that you might touch with your bare skin.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    20. Re:This may be a dumb question... by stevelinton · · Score: 1

      I've heard rumour of people using electron microscopes to read the data bit-by-bit from partly trashed platters. With enough equipment and time you should be able to recover every bit of which a reasonable number of atoms are still present on the disk, unless whatever damaged the disk damaged the magnetisation.

      I'm kind of surprised this wasn't done to the Challenger disk, rather than risk spinning the platters, so maybe it is just rumour, but it's a cool idea.

    21. Re:This may be a dumb question... by techwrench · · Score: 0

      We used to to that do some drives years ago in the shop that I worked at. Swapping out the drive boards was a simple task that sometimes saved a customers data.

      There were some drives that a board swap worked, and others, even with the same model, it wouldn't.

      --
      It's You and I against the World... When do we attack?
    22. Re:This may be a dumb question... by piojo · · Score: 1

      I should add (my wording was dangerously ambiguous): I had to dry the drive thoroughly before it worked again. That meant using a blowdrier.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
  6. How do you backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a slashdot advertorial?

    1. Re:How do you backup by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google cache?

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  7. Never had any luck with recovery by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my professional career, I've sent around 10 drives out for recovery, (various companies) and none of them were able to be successfully recovered. I think that most of these companies use some variation of R-Tools so that they can quote amazing statistics on their websites. (Over 99% of all data is recoverable!)

    Sure, I suppose if the drive has bad electronics AND the head hasn't crashed, you might have some luck, but I never seem to get any of those cases. As far as people accidentally formatting their drives or deleting files, I can recover that stuff myself.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    1. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by sfbiker · · Score: 1
      You might try reading the article linked in the parent posting for a case where the drive had both bad electronics *and* the head crashed yet they still recovered 80% of the data.

      Unless your 10 drives were all run over by a truck or incinerated in a crash, then you're sending your drives to the wrong company. Oh wait, even if the drive has been incinerated in a crash, the data could still be recovered.

    2. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      The point of my post is that I have trouble believing the validity of the claims of these companies. I read the article in its entirety, and said in my post that I have personally never had any luck. Just because a company uses some extreme examples (we recovered data from a hard drive that was run over by a tank!) doesn't mean that, in fact, a user with a head crash has a high probability that they will recover data.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    3. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by sfbiker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's so hard to beleive? That it's possible to recover data from drives that have a physical or electrical problem?

      So you think that the original article was a fabrication? Or maybe that Drivesavers took the guys $1500 and just ran r-tools to recover his data (and scrapped 20% of it just to make it look like it was hard)? What about Kroll Ontrack? Did they fleece NASA too with the Columbia disk recovery? Or maybe NASA made up the whole thing?

      In spite of the article sounding like an advertisement (they probably offered the author a discount on his fee if he published his experience), I don't see anything extraordinary in the article that makes the data recovery hard to believe.

      I've had one personal experience with data recover services -- it wasn't my drive, but I saw the dead drive, it would not even spin up though the green light on the circuit board was blinking.

      They sent the drive to a recovery firm and $750 and 2 weeks later they got a DVD in the mail with the missing data and an explanation that the drive guts were fine, but the circuit board had some fault, so they just replaced the board (or maybe just some component) and were able to do a full recovery.

    4. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a drive with a mechanical problem that wouldn't spin up. It didn't have anything critical but it did have my last x weeks worth of software downloads which would have been a pain to re-download. I tried banging it, freezing it, you name it. What worked in the end was making sure it was upside down when it was powered up and giving it a little tap to get it spinning. Got it running for 24 hours - long enough to get all my data off. About 200Gb. Obviously a mechanical failure and obviously pure luck that I got it working again.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by mkiwi · · Score: 5, Informative
      My father had a failed hard drive many years ago and we sent it to Drivesavers. To say the least, I was not impressed. Not only did they manage only to recover 1/100 of his important powerpoint presentations and research, but they used Norton Utilities to do it. I know this because a few months later I bought Norton Utilities (Mac) and only the types of files recoverable from Norton were present. Also, the icons in the resource fork of each file had the exact same (some non-standard) icons for things like .doc, .pdf, etc. It was against the Norton Utilities EULA to use it for commercial purposes like these guys did. He was using a PowerBook and Mac OS X so maybe they didn't know what to do at the time.


      Needless to say, I was disappointed with the experience and in hindsight we should have never spent several thousand dollars to get almost nothing back.

      Now I have my dad's computer hooked up to an external hard drive using Time Machine. Unless our house burns down, which would be far more catastrophic than a hard disk failure, I don't anticipate having ever to do that again.

      Sorry if this comes off as overly negative, but as this article essentially an advertisement and people need to know customer experiences.

    6. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by missing000 · · Score: 1

      the circuit board had some fault, so they just replaced the board (or maybe just some component) and were able to do a full recovery.
      This is about as complicated as drive recovery typically is. In fact, you can save your $750 and some time by just ordering a new PCB from the drive manufacturer themselves in most cases where temperature variation doesn't do the trick.
    7. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 2
      While I haven't sent in 10 drives, I have sent in one to Ontrack and it could not be recovered.

      Here is my previous post on the subject in the Ontrack Columbia Article.

      I'll add it here so you don't have to go and read it:

      I think this is false. I sent a hard drive to them and they sent it back (and made me $100 poorer) and told me they couldn't recover anything.

      The story of the drive: I had my computer (tower) at a party in college and one of the sides was off. I also had one of my storage (not boot) hard drives (which contained various art, pictures, and other valuable stuff to me) laying on the bottom of the 'puter. A buddy came flying out of a door, hit my hand which contained my beer and the beer went flying into the case and all over my hard drive. Needless to say I was pretty well "gone" at that point and toweled the inside/drive off, but left it running. At that point my computer was the party machine pumping loud music and it couldn't be stopped. :P Anyhow, let's skip to the next morning where I go and power down the computer and check out the drive. Well the chips on the controller card were fried. (Physically melted.) :(

      So the moral of the story is that if you want to make your data unrecoverable, have a party. Space shuttle explosions will not do the trick. Oh, and backups are good. :) And probably about 20 other morals too. :P

      Needless to say, I sort of hope that one day I will find a company that can recover the data, because if they can recover a hard drive from a space shuttle explosion, you'd think a little beer would be nothing. :P
    8. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by mpaulsen · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You might try reading the article linked in the parent posting for a case where the drive had both bad electronics *and* the head crashed yet they still recovered 80% of the data."

      80%? People get paid for this?
      Guessing 1 or 0 for every bit will successfully recover 50% of the data, assuming the ones and zeros are equally represented.

      Once you've got it 50% recovered it's a simple matter to flip the bits in the remaining 50%. 100% recovery.

    9. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I think you're math is off... 1s and 0s aren't data in any way, shape, or form. There is no useful "data" at the user level stored in 1s and 0s. Data is chunks of 1s and 0s that make up stored files that are actually useful to the user, so having 50% of the file uncorrupted is not a possibility. Corruption is all or none, one bit is wrong and there is no data, the idea of partial corruption is illegitimate for all intents of purposes because any amount of corruption is the same, save for the fact "less" corruption may make recovery easier.

    10. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Also not to mention the whole filesystem thing, like how the data is stored and the pointers to the data and if it's fragmented, etc.. there are just so many reasons why guessing on the individual bit level makes no sense and isn't how the percentage of recovered data is measured.

    11. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by mpaulsen · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you're math is off... 1s and 0s aren't data in any way, shape, or form. There is no useful "data" at the user level stored in 1s and 0s. Data is chunks of 1s and 0s that make up stored files that are actually useful to the user" You're mostly correct. Individual ones and zeros are called anecdotes. It's only when you put together two or three anecdotes that you have data.

      so having 50% of the file uncorrupted is not a possibility. Corruption is all or none, one bit is wrong and there is no data You're missing the beauty of the algorithm. You simply take a guess at each bit. If you're right, you've recovered that anecdote. The anecdotes are binary, so if you guess wrong all you need to do is flip the bit.

      the idea of partial corruption is illegitimate for all intents of purposes Missed it by -| |- that much. So close....so close.

      because any amount of corruption is the same, save for the fact "less" corruption may make recovery easier. I could try to explain the theory, but it would be easier if you just tried it yourself. Start with 10101 as your data and corrupt it any way you want. Now flip a coin for each bit and record a 1 if you flip heads and 0 if you flip tails. Keep the bits which are correct and flip the ones which are incorrect. You just recovered 100% of the data.
    12. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. okay I think I understand now, but then how to you know what bits are correct? Isn't that what you are looking for?

    13. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by mpaulsen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm.. okay I think I understand now, but then how to you know what bits are correct? Isn't that what you are looking for? Just diff against your backups.
    14. Re:Never had any luck with recovery by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I recently retired an old (8 yrs) sick HD, with one partition that had the creeping crud, and was so far gone that even the mfgr's diagnostics refused to touch it.

      I used an ancient version of Norton Ghost for DOS (v5 or v6) to clone it to a new HD. Well, I forgot to omit the bad partition. Ooops, guess we'll just let it run... 14 hours later (with over 200mb requiring multiple retries, it took a long time!) it cloned *everything* in the bad partition, and most amazing, so far I've found NO errors in the data.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  8. DriveSavers by DanWS6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    DriveSavers can save your dead drives so check out DriveSavers today and see their other link about DriveSavers and did I mention DriveSavers.

    The recovery team did not give away many secrets, but they did reveal a number of insights into the process. Cool article, just wish it didn't read like an advertisement.
    1. Re:DriveSavers by frdmfghtr · · Score: 0

      DriveSavers can save your dead drives so check out DriveSavers today and see their other link about DriveSavers and did I mention DriveSavers.

      The recovery team did not give away many secrets, but they did reveal a number of insights into the process.
      Cool article, just wish it didn't read like an advertisement.
      You mean like your post?
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    2. Re:DriveSavers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoosh!!!

  9. That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having read the article, I can't help but think that it doesn't really read like an article of "Oh, this happened, and then this happened" especially considering that it is about hard driver recovery.

    Short of "sending in a zip lock satchel" and "using methodology" what exactly did this article cover in regards to recovering hard drive information? Not a lot. Sorry to be a bit of a drag here, but considering that the company was mentioned more than once, with links and so forth, it just made the whole thing read like a glorified infomercial with the added bonus of being surrounded by advertising. :(

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also the change of narration from "my brother in-law's drive" to "my drive" is a give away. The lazy author of the ad couldn't even bother to keep the details/made-up-story straight.

    2. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by momerath2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      On top of that, I'm pretty sure those were stock images in the "article." I've seen the first one on their advertisements before.

      Good call.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    3. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by bogie · · Score: 1

      What, you mean telling you they swaped the parts and then utilized "proprietary technology" wasn't enough insight for you?

      This article was crap, pure crap wrapped in a fancy bow which only momentarily gave the impression that it might not be crap. But in the end, pure crap.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    4. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel bad now for clicking on the "be sure to check out the museum link" at the bottom. Somewhere some jackoff is smiling at all the hits they are getting...
      I hope I remember never to again read a story submitted by fields and most likely never read a story posted by kdawson

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was posted biefly earlier today. Somebody had the good sense to remove it then, and I hope it gets the same treatment now/soon.

    6. Re:That's not an article, it's a long ad :( by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1
      The author may have used "my" drive to streamline the story, after all, once he received it from his brother in law, he sent it to recovery, so it became "his".

      However it really does read like an ad, with very little insight into how they work.

  10. Just a Slash-Ad by daniel23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The summary says Be sure to visit the Museum of Disk-asters too. and I did. It is pure advertising. Zero facts, instead boring emotional angle with mom and pop hugging as all their iMac data got recovered.

    That stuff on the front page? Bahh! Instead of 15 modpoints twice a week give me 5 article mod points to vote this one down to -1 overrated.

    --
    605413? Yes, it's a prime.
    1. Re:Just a Slash-Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually get 15 mod points twice a week?

    2. Re:Just a Slash-Ad by daniel23 · · Score: 1

      well, have to wait if the trend continues but it was like that last week and since I always try to spend almost all the points I had a busy week...
      Had been 10 points each time for some time before that

      --
      605413? Yes, it's a prime.
  11. Nice freaking advertisement by meeotch · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Although there was severe media corruption on this drive, DriveSavers engineers were able to successfully recover the majority of the critical data by utilizing our proprietary software and methodology."

    I'm sorry, but that was the most content-free load I've read on /. in a while. And no, I'm not new here - I just usually don't RTFA. ;-P

    1. Re:Nice freaking advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new... damn!

      Um...

      I'm new here you insensitive clod!

  12. Defcon 14 had a talk about this by thule · · Score: 5, Informative

    Video of the talk:

    Defcon 14 - Hard Drive Recovery

    Basically it talks about making a clean box and how to change out the read heads or the PCB from a drive that is the exact same model. Really cool stuff!

    1. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Great presentation on HDD recovery.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    2. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      While we don't swap heads/platters, we have had from time to time needed to swap the onboard controller card. We keep ALL removed hard drives that the customers don't request back, in case we can use the card to recover another drive someone else brings in. The quantums were really nice that way, they had a habit of setting a part on the board ON FIRE and not working anymore. Swap cards, poof, working hard drive. Needed to be the same capacity though and same attachment to the hard drive body.

      Last week we recovered 26gb of a customer's data, full recovery, in about 10 sessions of using rsync. We'd let rsync run until the drive "hung up" on us, then cancel it and into the freezer to cool back down for 10 min, repeat.

      That chirp he heard is a failure of one of the windings (or the driver IC) on the spindle motor. It's a stepper, and so if a winding goes out, it can't step, and it just resonates at the stepping frequency, and makes a very noticeable "chiiirp". (it's trying to move the head, stepping at an audible frequency, which is why you can hear it) This is followed by a loud click as the drive determines it can't read anything and resets itself, one step of which is to move the read head all the way to the parking track. It does this regardless of where it's at currently because it can't read track information to tell, so it moves it the full distance, and slams into the hard stop and makes the loud noise like a free ball in a pinball machine. Most drives will make 3-6 hard reset attempts before shutting down, but some will go forever.

      I've dealt with several dozen Seagate 2.5" HDDs lately, and they just give a loud TAK-TAK-TAK...TAK-TAK-TAK and that's it, you can't hear the chirp. Most of the 3.5" drives do the cyclic chiiirpTAK...chiiirpTAK...chiiirpTAK and then power off. Either way, as far as WE are concerned, dead drive. We refer customers to drivesavers, and due to cost, very few send it in, but a few do. (maybe 5%) So far they have had success with all the people we have referred.

      TotalRecall is another company that does this sort of work, but I don't have any experience with them. One nice thing with drivesavers is if they can't recover ANYTHING from the drive, you don't get billed. (but shipping I think)

      The OP's article was mighty light on details. I think I just provided more info than they did... :P

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by jfim · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the presentation materials are not available at the URL he mentions, but they are available at http://www.myharddrivedied.com/

    4. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by chebucto · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can tell me what's happening with my iPod hard drive. It will fail, going through a cycle of making a spin up sound and then a loud click 3-4 times before shutting down. I've 'fixed' it by putting a couple of business cards between the back of the drive & the back of the case... and it's been working for more than a year now. Every so often it'll fail again, and I'll either re-seat the business cards in the middle of the drive, or add another card (I think it's up to three now... with four, the drive refused to spin up).

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    5. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by v1 · · Score: 1

      The loud noise you are hearing is commonly referred to as "tapping". Several drive/computer manufacturers have a condition they describe as "taps on boot", which is what I tend to see. With some drives though, the tap is periodic while you are using the drive. I had a 23 (yes 23) GB hard drive in my black powerbook (1999) and it started tapping sometimes 2-3 times/hour a few months after I got it. I thought for sure it was going to die, (and seagate offered to replace it for free after hearing it over the phone) but it lasted a good four years before I sold the computer.

      The "shims" you're using are probably not really helping the problem. As in, they are allowing it to work but are probably accelerating the problem. It may go like my 23 did and just keep making noise and keep working, but more likely one day it will just get to the point of being unrecoverable and you'll have to replace it or throw it. The top covers on small hard drives are VERY close to the platter, and there are often warnings on them saying "do not press on cover" because it can contact the platter. I can only guess that you have enough shims in place now that the cover is very lightly dragging on the platter, and that adding more shims prevents it from spinning up. Your shims may be causing the platter to spin slower than normal, which may be helping it to access. Sounds very touchy.

      The drive I mentioned in my previous post would tap 3-4 times in total before it would stop accessing. Sometimes I'd get only a few seconds between taps or somtimes maybe 20 minutes, but when it hit its limit that ended the session.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:Defcon 14 had a talk about this by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      What would you say this sounds like? 2.5" Fujitsu drive.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  13. Summary of Article by WK2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Recovering hard drives is a 3 step process:

    1) Mumbo Jumbo
    2) Put drive platter into otherwise identical drive
    3) proprietary secret stuff (sound like they used Windows to get the data off and then burn to DVDs.

    Now you don't have to read the article.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Summary of Article by cojsl · · Score: 3, Funny
      you forgot:

      4. profit!

  14. Does he get paid for this sh** ? by budword · · Score: 1

    "There is no there there." Why post it at all ? Shouldn't the editors read the stories before putting them on the front page ?

  15. Any *REAL* information out there? by ziah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any *REAL* guides out there that will show you how it's done through purchasing hardware from a store? It'd be nice to be able to do this all yourself if you have the right tools...

    1. Re:Any *REAL* information out there? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's tons of information out there. We'll omit details about how your data should have been backed up. The rest of it's pretty simple, and it depends on your filing system, but marginally.

      1) find out what's wrong with the drive (logic board or drive motor board)
      2) get an identical drive; put the old platter assy into the new drive's guts, or just move the good drive's electronics over
      3) use a sector editor to find the FAT, journal, or whatever, or restore the MBR and use your fav OS (Kunbuntu, here)
      4) painfully gather files (actually, go out back while they're retrieved for you)
      5) collect fat (as in BIG) check with lots of kudos, thank yous, and appreciation
      6) repeat

      You don't have to backup, as long as you have a fat wallet.

      p.s. TFA really does sound like a commercial.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Any *REAL* information out there? by number11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      get an identical drive; put the old platter assy into the new drive's guts, or just move the good drive's electronics over

      That's the hard part. "Identical" means not only model, but often revision as well. Once I did get lucky and find another drive from the same batch, and successfully trade circuit boards. But a couple of other times I failed to find the same rev. number, and the transplant didn't work.

      I've been successful a few times freezing the drive (sometimes extending runtime with a can of freeze spray, an aerosol like canned air but gets a lot colder, intended to help techs find thermal problems). And mechanically abusing it (twisting it to start the platter spinning, or just whacking it.

      Always have everything ready to go, if you do get it started it may work for ten minutes and quit. Maybe you'll get it started a second time, maybe not.

      When the problem has (apparently) been data corruption rather than a hardware problem, I've been successful with software a few times. Once with OnTrack EasyRecovery, several times with File Scavenger. Including once where the problem was obviously a head crash, the drive made a horrid screeching sound. Couldn't get all of the data, but got some of it.

      There's a pdf at http://www.hddrecovery.com.au/ that's got some other suggestions. (I have never tried that company's recovery software so have no opinion on it.)

      I've never had anybody who was willing to pay to have the data recovery pros do it. But often they'd be willing to go a few hundred bucks for me to have a shot at it. Sometimes we get lucky. Sometimes we don't.

    3. Re:Any *REAL* information out there? by postbigbang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We recovered numerous ones, especially in the easy old days.

      A few of our techniques:

      -Slam an ST-225 onto a table to get the heads off the drive, a condition known as 'striction'
      -Recovered a Novell-formatted drive by using an identical one's logic board, and a few well-placed jumps to its table
      -Used a sector editor to hand copy one copy of a FAT to the primary table
      -Figured out, then wrote a master boot record from one drive to another (in SVR4) doing the recalc on the drive geometry
      -Found a MBR virus, including epithet, on an early laptop drive; we x-d it out and the machine finally booted to the point where we got to the place where we could write a new partition table.

      These days, we just backup things furiously. Bad hard drive? Take out back to the trash. Restore. Repeat.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:Any *REAL* information out there? by FlyingGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless there is physical damage to the platters, which is pretty much obvious, then you do not have to do much if it is either the spindle motor / control logic / bearing assembly or the Head Actuator / or heads themselves.

      The days of having a platter dedicated to a servo track are gone, but the drive will orient itself and figure out where things are located. If you can get the platters from an old drive, into the new drive, in the correct stacking order, then on spin up, the heads should un-park, and the drive should be just as it was, and run for however long the chassis will last.

      If The heads crashed into the platter(s), its another bowl of rice. At that point things get a little sticky. The new chassis will attempt to orient itself on the platter(s) but if it cannot find its synch point, then all bets are off, and you need a very special bench setup, where you can give direct commands to the drive logic, and then view the results, because you will have to re-establish synch, and that is not easy.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    5. Re:Any *REAL* information out there? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I'll write you a real easy one:

      If it is bad blocks, corrupt file table, or other non-hardware related problem use the available software. Most of it works fairly well and copy the stuff to a new drive.

      If it is a mechanical failure freeze the thing - just read the comments here at +3 and there are a few good descriptions. I'm willing to bet some of the data restoration places have some nice dedicated things that the drive plugs into and are continually cooled (I also bet to something colder than just your freezer, but I wouldn't know for sure). However a condom or baloon wrapped around the thing (to help with condensation - I'll have to try an above mentioned rice in a bag thing too) and the night in the freezer works many times.

      For full electrical/mechanical failures you will have to have a clean room so that is pretty much out (or, if you have the knowledge and ability to make one you will not be asking your question). You can do anything from replace the individual electronic failure to removing the platters and placing them on a custom made spindle that reads the drives. It would depend on how extensive the damage and how easy that part is to replace.

      If you have actual media failure, such as a nice set of coasters I use where a sudden power drop/surge/drop/surge that somehow made it through the UPS in our data room (and mind this is the data room at a national lab so it wasn't some little crappy piece of hardware you get at Best Buy) that caused the read/write heads to touch the platter while it happily tried to park them (and then spin up while the heads were parked) you have to sacrifice a goat, your first born, and whatever else you can think. I had a lot of dangerous to breath dust that previously held my data and four nice platters that are now conversation pieces.

      Basically if the drive works use software, if it doesn't try freezing it, if that fails pay someone else.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  16. Advertisments by doomy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I for one now know what Driver Savers is (since I RTFA), but the whole thing lacks details. A story in /. should have more details than a glorified advertisement for a hard disk recovery job. There is a company down the street from me that does similar work for NASA and thus I don't think this is a unique field that no one on /. has ever heard of.

    Here is what I'd like to see (to submitter), maybe you should have gone to the corp with your drive (since you did spend 2k on recovery.. why not fly over?). Then you should have taken pictures of the whole process and even a video (instead of using stock images), and most of all you could have avoided all this by using backups.

    But this story would have been truly /. worthy if you (submitter) bought an identical harddisk and tried to swap platters etc and tried the recovery on your own. I've seen people do this and it's not hard to recover data even if you have physical damage on the drive.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
  17. Heck, I'll share my secret by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Here it is. Nothing helps a hard disk recovery like 500 Gigs of mirrored backup goodness.

  18. Data recovery using Open Source tools by alriode · · Score: 1

    I know these people handle very delicate cases (i.e. physically damaged media beyond all recognition).

    As for simpler situations (accidental reformatting, not-so-extreme disk failure), the are some useful Open Source utilities like MondoRescue, GParted, fdisk (or cfdisk) and dd ("disk dump").

    The most simple rescue method implies mounting the damaged partition onto another media, for instance an external hard drive, using Knoppix.

    I recall having rescued a NTFS data partition using this method (the hard drive had spun very badly due to an electrical outage).

    --
    "Nature is indifferent to our values, and can only be understood by ignoring our notions of good and bad." (B. Russell)
  19. Re:Hmmm. Cheaper... well, I s'pose the depends by davidsyes · · Score: 1, Funny

    on where you are, and that determines how hard condoms are to come by... (Careful... I'm watching my prepositions, and not necessarily the pre-positions....)...

    But, in the vein of hard drives, i guess a not having protection can cause a bunch of thrashing about in the end... (buns, umm, PUNS intended...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  20. What is a good DIY success rate? by thogard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've done a few platter swaps and have had good luck if I can find the right donor drive. So far I've gotten data off most of the disks I've tried but sometimes the recovery rate can be as low as 25%.

    I recommend that people buy drives in pairs. That way you have a good drive to use as parts once the data has been moved off to a newer drive.
    I do repairs in my house so there isn't a clean room in sight.
    If the board is fried, a board swap tends to do the trick but the bad sectors are stored on the board so the mapping will result in some bad data.
    I start with the hard drive in the freezer (using a external firewire case) trick first. That tends to get noisy bearings about 3 hours which is enough to copy data over.
    If that doesn't work, I do a platter swap. I disassemble the drive and I've found that normal printer paper works great for lifting out the platters with out scratching them. Just make sure you put them in the donor drive in the same order and don't flip them. Once the platters are in, it appears that the drives have a few days to live before they stop working. With head crashes, you might want to consider only putting the good platters in. I have yet to find a good cleaning solution so with crashes you have a very limited amount of time but head crashes seem to be rare these days.

    Once you can read the disk, use DD to copy the data to a new disk. Don't try to mount it to look for a specific file unless you only need one file and mount it read only. For data file recovery, I use a mac program Data Rescue by Prosoft which is good except it sometimes is too good and pulls out the internals like pictures out of flash and office docs.

    If your going to do this at home, take apart a few older disks first. Keep in mind they designed these things to be assembled quickly so there is a way to retract the heads completely off the platter so hunt around for it. There are some people who use vacuum cleaners to try to remove dust and others will use a shower to steam up a bathroom and wait until the steam clears with the hope of taking the dust away. I just open the drives on my computer desk.

    1. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by grommit · · Score: 1

      I recommend that people buy drives in pairs. That way you have a good drive to use as parts once the data has been moved off to a newer drive. Or, better yet, set up those two drives as a RAID mirror and have your recovery handled before the failure even occurs.

      Unless you really enjoy swapping out drive platters that is.
    2. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by number17 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! If you have two identical drives, a simple nightly cron job or scheduled task that copies data from one drive to the other makes more sense.

    3. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really a clean room is overkill. I have disassembled drives and had them running out in the open in a dusty environment for weeks with no errors. But I guess a recovery center has to be a bit more cautious.

    4. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by arminw · · Score: 2, Informative

      ....Or, better yet, set up those two drives as a RAID mirror ...

      For Macs with 10.5 that has become easier because of Time Machine. A 2x1000G RAID box connected to an Apple Extreme wireless router does backups for 6 Macs over the network.

      If one of the drives fails, the RAID device makes an audible alarm and indicates which of the two drives has died. A new drive can be installed without shutting down the RAID system. Once the new drive is plugged in, the controller in that box automatically copies all the data from the still working drive.

      So far, there have been no glitches or hiccups. Our lone PC user has to copy important files manually to the RAID box.

      --
      All theory is gray
    5. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by thogard · · Score: 1

      I know RAID is supposed to work that way but I have never seen it work that way in the real world.

    6. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're buying two identical drives in the first place, why wouldn't you run both at the same time, mirrored?

      - R

    7. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Until the RAID controller fails...

      --
      -
    8. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....but I have never seen it work that way in the real world.....

      I am, like you also a little skeptical at times about fancy technology. Before totally committing to this Wiebetech RAID box, I did unplug one of the two drives for a while. It did indeed beep, but continue to work on the remaining drive. After a day or so I replace the second drive. The RAID controller immediately began re-imaging the replaced drive. The display indicated that this is what was happening. Later that day the normal DRIVE OK display returned for the second drive. The power was never turned off.

      So it appears to work as advertised. I have to use the USB interface, but that little box also has a very much faster eSATA connection. The controller, by default is set up for drive mirroring (RAID1) but may be re-programmed for making one large volume out of the two drives. (RAID0)

      --
      All theory is gray
    9. Re:What is a good DIY success rate? by thogard · · Score: 1

      They all seem to work once or twice... try it 10 times (giving it enough time to rebuild the new disk) or try it with a disk where its confused or try it after a power down (simulate erplacing a drive after a major power problem). Then make sure to do a full fsck or chkdsk on the disk and then see if it works. I don't know about your device but most of the times I've tried this, I end up with a mess of bits scattered over disks after just a few swaps.

  21. Where's the beef? by hurfy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A little light on content as others mentioned :(

    Nothing as interesting as the crash on our old mini-computer ages ago either. One of those 12" drives with 4-5 platters had a head crash and repurposed itself into a metal lathe quick nicely one weekend. At least it didnt burn down the building but it left several pounds of aluminum confetti all over the computer room after it blew out the filters on the drive. It seems you just can't filter air by the pound :( One head crashes and causes a chain reaction after the aluminum shavings clog the filters or interfer with the others. Luckily the software forced you to backup on the removeable platter each day. Only loss was a couple software mods (that the writer had a copy of) cause the system platter backup was kinda old, had to added back in.

    Needless to say, that had a zero chance of recovery. Only time a insanely overpriced maintainence agreement ever paid off...Drive was almost $20k to replace plus cleanup and setup on 200lb drive.

    Only other one that might have required a recovery service turned out to be electronic issue only and i sacificed a matching computer for the HD circuit board to repair the 'server' from a remote warehouse. Only some memos and spreadsheets and stuff and not worth the huge quote for recovery so i got to try it and fixed it the next day :)

    PS. always found it interesting the the edge speed was the same as current drives at around 105mph. The head hit a platter going between 50 and 105 mph.

  22. What the hell are the moderators doing ? by ymenager · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article is such a blatant fake / advertisement, how could the moderators let that be published on the front page ?

    As noted by many, no real technical information. Whoever wrote it might have tried to sound 'grassroot', but the whole thing still reads very much like a marketing material... 'Be sure to visit the Museum of Disk-asters too' ? Especially when such page contains nothing but marketing stuff ? Give me a break !

    And how many people would go pay 2000$ just to get back some music and photos of the family ???

    Slashdot needs a system so that people can RATE THE MODERATORS, because anyone who lets something such blatant fake-grassroot marketing material on the front-page should not be in that position.

    The whole thing is just an insult to our intelligence

    1. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by IrritableBeing · · Score: 1

      Dollar sign goes in front of the numeric value, but that's neither here nor there.

    2. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by pmoses · · Score: 1

      I modded this article up. Now you can mod me down. I wanted at least one article from junk in firehose to mod up. The article itself has not much value for me, but discussion has.

    3. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many people would go pay 2000$ just to get back some music and photos of the family ???
      I would, if it came to that, but instead I bought ten 500gb drives and use eight of them for a RAID6 and two as hot swappable backups of critical data that I periodically take to my safe deposit box. All of this is much cheaper than the data recovery fee.
    4. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot needs a system so that people can RATE THE MODERATORS, because anyone who lets something such blatant fake-grassroot marketing material on the front-page should not be in that position. Slashdot has a system so that people can rate the moderators; it's called meta-moderation. What you're looking for is a system so that people can rate the editors who post these stories.

      You can't rate the editors, but you can turn them off. If you never want to see anything posted by kdawson again, you can go to your preferences and opt out of future kdawson articles.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1
      If this was the person's only copy of pictures from the past two years, the cost may be priceless. I would certainly pay $2000 to retrieve the data, however, it's is an expensive lesson to make backups.

      I've had several drives crash on me, now I make regular backups onto another PC and dvd's. The dvd's are stored at two locations for redundancy (home and work).

    6. Re:What the hell are the moderators doing ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article is such a blatant fake / advertisement, how could the moderators let that be published on the front page ?

      As noted by many, no real technical information. Whoever wrote it might have tried to sound 'grassroot', but the whole thing still reads very much like a marketing material... 'Be sure to visit the Museum of Disk-asters too' ? Especially when such page contains nothing but marketing stuff ? Give me a break !

      And how many people would go pay 2000$ just to get back some music and photos of the family ???

      Slashdot needs a system so that people can RATE THE MODERATORS, because anyone who lets something such blatant fake-grassroot marketing material on the front-page should not be in that position.

      The whole thing is just an insult to our intelligence You mean like this http://slashdot.org/faq/metamod.shtml or do you mean moderating the editors?
  23. Hard drives fail much more often than claimed by webplay · · Score: 1

    The big issue is that you cannot take the word of hard drive manufacturers about drives' reliability at a face value. Google's study (PDF) and CMU's study show much higher real-life HDD failure rates than you would get from manufacturers' MTBF claims. RAID 1 or higher is not the full solution - multiple failures, controller failures or data corruption can still occur. Your drives will most often fail without any warning.

    1. Re:Hard drives fail much more often than claimed by pmoses · · Score: 1

      For home use try BackupPC or similar software. http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

  24. Not really. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Flash itself is all one chip. The equivalent of a hard disk controller failure would be a failure in the read/write circuitry in the flash chip. Unless you're thinking of flash chip microsurgery, you're SOL.

    Of course if only the USB interface chips are broken, you could potentially unsolder the flash part off the bad unit and onto a good unit and recover it.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  25. rockin by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    regardless of what some are saying about this article being more about advertising, the hard drive recovery process is very interesting and something people should take the time to learn about. Not cheap by any means, but I will say that I am a DriveSavers partner and their work is superb. For being a reseller/partner they give you 10% of the data recovery fee for anyone you refer. And on top of that, they also give your customer a 10% discount as well for the referral. Well worth it for those people who drop their laptops in the ocean or those careless DJs that have the tendancy to spill their beers. Not to mention they can recover encrypted data and respect people's privacy. Mostly government agencies. And I mean c'mon, they rescued JIMMY FREAKIN BUFFET'S DATA! Now THAT'S saying something!!! well.. maybe they shouldn't of done that.. we could have dealt with one less Jimmy Buffet album.. damnit why the hell did you recover that data!!

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  26. Not always a good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About eight years ago, I used one of these data recovery companies [can't remember which, I'm afraid] and I was not impressed. I had a dual boot windows/linux machine whose hard drive died. They managed to recover almost everything from two different windows partitions but ***nothing*** from any of the six linux partitions. I was never convinced that they even tried to get stuff from those partitions. Perhaps their software was FAT orientated, but I don't know.

    1. Re:Not always a good job... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      You should know that most of the companies don't know a thing about software or hardware. They just plug in the drive and hit a button. Its sad but it seems like most of those companies are the McDonald's of the computer industry, you don't have to know anything beyond Windows and how to use a mouse to get a job there and judging from the odd looks I get whenever I mention anything outside of Windows (such as Linux, *BSD, Etc.) most of them don't.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  27. Re:Hmmm. Cheaper... well, I s'pose the depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont care who you are, but that there's funny.

  28. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

    1. Re:No, I'm New Here by genericpoweruser · · Score: 0
      In Soviet Russia, new here I'm.

      I, for one, welcome our new-here overlords.

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
  29. Screwdriver + dd by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Make a clean box, swap the platters, dd the data to a file, run various types of fsck on loopback until you get it right, mount loopback file, read data.

    3. Profit. /meh

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  30. Advertisement warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So in exchange for clicking the link and getting a full page video ad before getting to the article, I learned some amazing things about hard drive recovery like...

    1) First they take it into an ultra-cool clean room.
    2) They do something to it. Must be ultra cool.
    3) Recovered for $1900!!!

    I'm sure /. did a good job at helping him recover all 1900 of those dollars spent...

    For everyone else, don't bother with the link, my summary really is all there is to the article.

    1. Re:Advertisement warning... by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think Class 100 really qualifies as "ultra-cool" in the clean-room world, but it *does* however have a certain cachet of inconvenience as far as having to take a non-trivial amount of time to get into the bunny suit, walk across the 50 feet of sticky mats, through the air showers and into the actual clean-room area only to discover *then* that you have to take a leak. I've had it happen more than once.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  31. Let's review. by dmarcov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's well known that failed hard drives can be recovered, but few people actually use a recovery service because they're expensive and not always successful

    Yep. The article helpfully points out the $1500 charge for a medium sized hard drive. It might have been more interesting if the article demonstrated a time when it wasn't successful.

    Even fewer people ever get any insights into the process, as recovery companies are secretive about their methods and rarely reveal any more information that is necessary for billing.

    So, just like this article? Got it. Something involving putting old platters into new drives by people wearing bio-hazard suits.

    The recovery team did not give away many secrets, but they did reveal a number of insights into the process.

    Wowsers. You can say that again, but insights? I defy anyone to name any insight that wasn't in their last press release ... much like this article.

    [M]y drive failed in about every way you can imagine. It had electro-mechanical failure resulting in severe media damage.

    Doesn't "elctro-mechanical failure" describe anything that could be wrong with a device that is .. err .. mechanical and electrical? You mean the reciprocator was caught in the optical refraction? Now that's worth $1500.

    It's a good thing space on the interwebs is free. Someone should run this past the kids that edit airline magazines.

  32. Wow, thanks for the ad by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually use a number of drive recovery companies, and thanks to this slashvertisement I will never use this company nor will I read Geeks.com

    The sad part is that I rarely even read Slashdot anymore since it is a sad shell of what it was... Pitiful.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  33. Nice Theory But... by Gates82 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blogosphere theory is that it is the oil from the platter bearings that leaks and hardens.

    That is a nice theory but there is no oil in the bearings of a Hitachi (formerly IBM) drive. They ride on an air bearing. I have heard of faulty temperature sensors being reset through the freezing method, but whatever the reason I have seen the freezing method suggested by several sources. For me I believe that it has to do with moving the drive. Shorts or binds will often be resolved by moving the drive around.

    When I worked for IBM I did a fair share of data recovery. My favorite drive that I saved was a laptop drive with a stiction problem. It would get caught during spin-up. I put my ear to the drive and would listen to it and kept rebooting and shaking the drive until it finally got past the rough spot. Recovered all the engineers data who was extremely happy he didn't have to waste $500 bucks with Ontrack.

    --
    So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister?

    1. Re:Nice Theory But... by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My favorite disk to recover was a Quantum SCSI drive from an old Performa. That model frequently developed congealed oil in the armature bearings. The disk would run for a bit then stop since the heads wouldn't be able to move to a position to receive the servo pulse.

      The best way to get the drive going again was to power it up and about 1/2 second later give the edge opposite the connectors a light whack with a mallet. That would unstick the heads long enough to leave park and warm up.

    2. Re:Nice Theory But... by milsoRgen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there is no oil in the bearings of a Hitachi (formerly IBM) drive. They ride on an air bearing. As do all other hard drives.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    3. Re:Nice Theory But... by Vertigo+Acid · · Score: 1

      there is no oil in the bearings of a Hitachi (formerly IBM) drive. They ride on an air bearing. As do all other hard drives. Fluid dynamic bearings?
      --
      Beta is bad enough to make me go edit settings like this sig that haven't been touched since I joined
    4. Re:Nice Theory But... by iocat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a Mac IIcx with the same issues. When the drive (a Sony) first died, with no spinning (and no backups in the days of $500, 100MB drives), I was so frustrated I slammed down my fist on the top of the computer... and spun the drive up! After that I tried to avoid turning it off, or ever having the disc stop spinning, but if it did, I could always get it to start back up that way. I felt like Fonzi the IT guy...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    5. Re:Nice Theory But... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of how people are always amazed at the things you find in a nerds toolkit.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    6. Re:Nice Theory But... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fine, so it's the air leaking out and ... hardening ... yeah.

    7. Re:Nice Theory But... by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Nice Theory But... by chihowa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Air is a fluid.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:Nice Theory But... by Jurily · · Score: 2, Funny

      Back in the days when I did a lot of Win98 installs, I always carried a nice big hammer around. Put it on the computer before booting it up, and it installed perfectly *every time*.

      It started as a joke, but it actually worked... guess those casings had built-in hammer detectors, and the installer checked for it.

    10. Re:Nice Theory But... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kinda like my workbench HD, an ancient (800 mb) W.D. I got it as a failed HD from a customer, and it was then about 5 years old. I gave it the "beat it ever-harder, until it either gives in or dies" treatment, and....

      Powered on... just a whir, no bootup:

      rrrrrr... [tap tap]

      RRRRRR... [TAP TAP]

      *R*R*R*R*R*R*R... [*!!*WHAP*!!*]

      And after that it was unstictioned for good, and has worked fine ever since. It's now 13 years old!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  34. Article is useless, comments are good by NormalVisual · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I found an unusually large proportion of the follow up comments here to be (+1, Informative) and (+1, Interesting). TFA itself was total infomercial-tastic tripe, however.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  35. AFM-based recovery? by Compuser · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried recovering data by putting the platter under an AFM and using a magnetic tip?
    I did surface probe microscopy for a living for many years and to me it seems trivial. You can rent time at a university on a decent AFM and you should be in business though it might be slow going.
    Has anyone tried it?

    1. Re:AFM-based recovery? by silverpig · · Score: 1

      That'd be impossibly slow and waaaay too complicated. Of course if the NSA REALLY REALLY wanted some data off of some drive and everything else failed, I suppose this would work.

    2. Re:AFM-based recovery? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, read speeds would probably be around 1-10 bits per second, and then you'd either need to program some automated analysis software or...well you'd definitely need to automate it. Just finding the relevant data on the drive would be a nightmare.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  36. Drives and cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done something similar but somewhat less extreme than this. I had a laptop hard drive that wouldn't return any data in the laptop. It would identify, but that was it. In the external case it worked for a couple of minutes then stopped. Drive temperature seemed unusually high to the touch. Reasoning it was most likely a heat failure I pulled the drive out of the external case and put it, the usb-to-ide converter electronics and associated cabling in front of a Real F'ing Big Fan (tm), turned to high. Drive stayed cool to the touch, and worked perfectly for the half hour it took me to image it.

  37. And now a word from our sponsor... by htnprm · · Score: 1

    WTF? Adverts for disk recovery companies and bicycles than launch floppy disks. Thanks /. Have you jumped the shark?

    As for recovering data, and as many, many, many people have said here. If you don't have a backup, you are a complete tool. And I don't mean archiving to optical media, because you're just asking for trouble there.

    As for recovering data, short of mechanical failure, if you're trying to recover data from a drive or RAID array of some sort, I can't recommend the stuff from Runtime Software (runtime.org). RAID Reconstructor and GetDataBack have saved my arse more than a few times (Because yes, the first time I was a tool and didn't have a backup. The second time I still didn't have a backup, cause "That won't happen again". The third time I had a backup, but it wasn't automated, so it was out of date. The fourth time I didn't have sufficient capacity). So basically it just boils down to me being an idiot, but Runtime's software got everything back each time. The last instance just took three weeks (Long story). So now I have an automated backup, backing up the NAS to a RAID array of sufficient capacity.

  38. That is not a clean room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look at the normal ceiling tiles and door that aren't air tight. Even the small (3 employee) company I work for has a better clean room than that. Their outfits were just for show.

  39. Did the article writer get paid to write this? by tapehands · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Who pays $1,900 to recover "all of his music and all of the photos that his family has taken of their two year old son"?!

    From how it's worded in the article, this isn't information that would make or break daily life. Maybe if the music was one-of-a-kind stuff, or if the pictures were of a dead family member, and said pictures have only been stored on this one hard drive - that might justify the expense.

    More than likely, this guy only had run-of-the-mill mp3's (that could either be re-downloaded or re-ripped from the source), and all the important pictures have probably been sent to family members, friends, and/or uploaded to all the social networking websites you can think of. I've been through data losses like this (in that I lost a boatload of disposable media) more times than I'd like to admit, but I could never see my personal, non-work-related data ever being worth $1,900.

  40. The real truth about data recovery by vulcandata · · Score: 1

    I am surprised at the amount of voodoo and misconception on this topic, in a land of geeks who probably should know better. Having been in the data recovery business for several years, I have noticed that nobody gives your the real truth: Most data loss is the result of small corruption that fouls up your $MFT, or formatting, and as a result your drive is not recognized by "most" operating systems. This is what we classify as logical errors (not enough damage to warrant open case recovery) This is about 85% of all drive we see, and we only charge $80-160 on average. The ones we can't recover, we send to the SHOP, and they ARE 100% effective, so far. So most of what I read is crap, it is NOT reality, at all. But it is really hard to determine what is real in this VERY secretive industry, we are like the CIA......I am probably gonna disappear after this post. I AM NOT planning to commit suicide............

  41. That's what I was thinking... by msimm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've disassembled crashed drives (ceased) to temporarily free the platters. Aside from removing the platter (so they could get to more then 25% of the data, WTF?) it didn't really read like they actually did much. Maybe part of the reason that they are all smoke-and-mirrors about the work (some proprietary software, you mean like something they paid for?) is that when you get right down to it the work *most* of these shops do simply isn't rocket science.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  42. Adblock didn't catch this by andyh · · Score: 1

    Great, no new information, just an advert for a drive recovery company.

    I'm going to have to train Adblock to parse Slashdot for this sort of rubbish now!

  43. What about SSD disks? by chrysalis · · Score: 1

    Can SSD disks also fail without any prior notice?

    Is there any company able to recover data on a damaged SSD disk yet?

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:What about SSD disks? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      It depends whether the fault lies within the controller IC or one of the Flash memory ICs. If the former, your data might be recoverable in full. If the latter, it's more doubtful.

      Arm yourself with some SMD rework tools and as many different manufacturers' Flash memory developers' kits as you can blag, and you ought to be able to set yourself up in business rescuing SSDs.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  44. Advertorial by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    This was an advertorial, pure and simple. Advertising masquerading as editorial content. In UK newspapers and magazines, such content must be labelled as an advertisement. Seems that this does not apply to websites in less civilised nations.

    I was just waiting for the bit where a HDD caught fire and they managed to recover 90% of the data from a reflection of some of the smoke in a bystander's eye, as captured in a photograph on a mobile phone. Or the example of the parent whose little darling brought home a "kewl new game" from a friend at school which, after trying it out on the family PC with several generations' worth of photographs, home movies and so forth, turned out to be DBAN -- but DriveSavers recovered everything and even managed to render Grandad's old scanned sepiatone photographs into 48-bit colour.

    Hint: IT professionals, with a very few exceptions where it is genuinely relevant, do not use Adobe Flash content on their websites.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  45. Recover lost file structure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about non-hardware failures? Anyone able to provide any info about how to recover files where it appears to be just a loss of the file/index? I had a 320GB external Firewire/USB2 drive that had about 90 GB of mixed photos, music, text, office, etc that appears to have lost the ability to see content. It's all (mostly) there, as I can tell by the available memory display on the front, but the drive doesn't see it. Mac and PC same, appears empty. I've been looking at varied software to recover online, and haven't found anything that's really useful unless rediculously expensive. One was charging by the MB, and most don't recover file names or any sense of file organization. Honestly I can ignore the music, as I've got 99% of that on CDs that I'm too lazy to reimport, but the photos and possible some of the old docs are important to me. It burns me more than anything that there just doesn't be any actual damage beyond the machine lost it's index (thanks to an Apple Airport Airdisk update that messed up names of USB attached drives).
    Any good suggestions of where to go from here?

  46. PC saw it but no drive in My Computer ?!?!? by DJRikki · · Score: 1

    ... and they needed to change chips on the PCB to get further? "We had to replace the actuator assembly and components on the printed circuit board. By performing these actions, we were able to image about 25 percent of the drive." and "In my case they restored approximately 80 percent of the drive and put it on a new external hard drive" Maybe you should have, sorry maybe your brother in law - should have just reversed his truck over it coz according to their Museum of Disk-Asters they can get 100% data from that or 1700 degree infernos.

  47. Lame attempt for slash-ad by CALI-BANG · · Score: 1

    Lame attempt as counter-measure to the popularity that ontrack gets from http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/07/1834224

  48. Mapping problem by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Yes, but in my case, the drive was reporting 20% bad sectors, in any of the utilities I tried. There's no way it could have remapped all those sectors.


    No, that is because of the complexity that goes between mapping actual data to physical sectors.
    Because of various caching / read ahead / abstraction layers that each have different block size (physical is usually 512bytes, Linux software RAID is userconfigurable, but usually 64KiB by default, LVM partitions have usually 1MiB per bloc by default, most file systems use 4KiB blocs) / etc... you end up reading 1 single byte of data and the harddrive pulling several dozen or even a hundred of sectors.

    Thus the "bad sectors" utilities and built-in functionality in most file systems dramatically overstates the amount of damaged space.
    Manually using DD with all bufferings and caching disbaled might be a tad more reliable.

    What actually works is to read the drive's SMART logs to find which drive sector is reported as damaged, then using DD with all caching/buffering/etc. disabled to overwrite that single sector (you might want to try read that sector and the previous one, again with no buffering, to be sure if you can reproduce the flaw and if you correctly found the damaged sector).

    Then again retry the drive (best is to ask the onboard firmware to do a full scan using SMART), find other damaged sectors, and repeat.

    The SMART is the most precise tools, as you get the raw numbers as the harddrive is encountering them. There's no huge layer of abstraction which could lead to some sector being accessed even if it wasn't the initial intention.

    ---

    Also another possibility is that the drive didn't actually fail, but that some data was damaged.
    The drive reads the sector happily (no clicking noise of death or whatever), but some checksum fails along the line (either in the driver controller, and therefore SMART is reporting a bad checksum, not a unreadable sector - or in some other level in the OS)
    Writing new data force all the checksums to be updated with the new or corrected data, and everything is back to normal.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Mapping problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't look into SMART logs, but I do know that half the time when I booted, that SMART reported the drive as dead, and completely unusable.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  49. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hard drive companies never guarantee or warranty the data on your hard drive - ONLY the physical drive itself!

    Even if you send the hard drive back to the company, and the hard drive is under warranty, you always get a blank drive in return.

    Your data means nothing and the hard drive company wont recover or pay for recovery of your data even if they are at fault and the drive fails under warranty.

    Your only course of action to save money is to always buy two identical drives and always back one up to the other and keep it off line.

  50. Re:Important factor! by mortonda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I forgot the other important factor:

    Backups must be tested

  51. If anybody is interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anybody wants some fairly good information, then check out this site:
    http://www.actionfront.com/ts_whitepaper.aspx

    They have white papers on the subject. If you disregard the glorification the company allows themselves at the end of each paper, it gives some insights about what the data recovery services (usually) aim for and some basic stuff about hard drives.

  52. A Walk though the hard drive recovery process. by jesse285 · · Score: 1

    For the life of me every time that I have had this talk with other people they said that you can not bring back a hard drive, well girls and boys they would not have the Robot in lost in space the star of the the show when will get in trouble. Now that we can bring all Robot's back to life we will have some fun.