Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Automaker Unveils First Electric Car

JuliusSu writes "A Chinese auto manufacturer, BYD, is introducing today the country's first electric car, a plug-in hybrid vehicle. It plans to sell at least 10,000 cars in 2009 for a price of less than $22,000. This put the company ahead of schedule against other entrants to this market, such as Toyota, due to release a similar car in late 2009; and GM, whose Chevy Volt will be launched in late 2010. The company is best known for making cellphone batteries, and hopes its expertise in ferrous battery technology will allow it to leapfrog established car manufacturers."

341 comments

  1. quality by krakelohm · · Score: 4, Funny

    This should be good, lol.

    --
    You are all a bunch of idots.
    1. Re:quality by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      This should be good, lol.

      If we're lucky. If they can make an affordable, practical, electric car, more power to them, and if they really sell 10,000 next year, I guess we'll find out.

    2. Re:quality by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Yea I can picture it now!

      "BDY has recalled all 10,000 electric cars after a motorist was burned to death when his car battery exploded"

    3. Re:quality by stonedcat · · Score: 1, Funny

      But explosions come free of charge..

      Besides everyone knows that individual lives aren't important in China.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    4. Re:quality by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      And the Corvair and Pinto were less of a death trap? Give them a couple of years of success and customer feedback (read "people who vote with their wallet") and may the better solution win.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    5. Re:quality by matrim99 · · Score: 1

      No doubt. Don't lick the paint!

      --
      Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
    6. Re:quality by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      FYI: You get what you pay for, this goes for the Chinese manufacturers too.

    7. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, all 9999 cars.

    8. Re:quality by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      They wont. In China, the value of a human life is cheap. Just look at the motorcycle sales vs accident ratio for the first generation Chinese motorcycle, the death rate was 100%, yes, 100%! Basically what you get is human trial of products. As far as the government is concerned, they consider every Chinese hybrid owner a beta tester. They are very practical, every death is one number less to worry about in term of over population.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    9. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acid rain from the coal fired plants that charge the main cells produce an additional battery effect due to all the lead in the vehicle's paint.

    10. Re:quality by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Better yet,

      wait until (if it's successful) they make plants in the US, built exclusively in the US under a US subsidiary, but people complain that we're fueling china.

    11. Re:quality by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the Corvair and Pinto were less of a death trap?

      The Pinto was a deathtrap, sure, but not the Corvair. Ralph Nader is a grandstanding dickhead who basically launched his career on false accusations and shoddy methodology in Unsafe at Any Speed. After a 2 year investigation, the NHTSA determined that there wasn't any problem at all with the Corvair. Despite what Ralph Nader thought the law should have been, the fact remains that there was not and is not a requirement that a car fail gracefully when negligently driven beyond its capabilities. GM changed the design in '65 to widen the margin of safety, but automakers are under no obligation to save yoyos from themselves when they over-inflate their front tires and go hotrodding in their rear-engine swingaxle car. It's no different than idiots rolling their Ford Explorers because the smooth, car-like suspension makes them think they can weave in and out of heavy traffic like Mario Andretti.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:quality by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they can make an affordable, practical, electric car, more power to them, and if they really sell 10,000 next year, I guess we'll find out.

      Let's see. From the article, it'll cost $22000, have a range of 62 miles, and be available outside China in 2011.

      This doesn't look like it'll meet your expectations.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:quality by robertl234 · · Score: 1

      If they can make an affordable, practical, electric car, more power to them, and if they really sell 10,000 next year, I guess we'll find out.

      Let's see. From the article, it'll cost $22000, have a range of 62 miles, and be available outside China in 2011.

      This doesn't look like it'll meet your expectations.

      Yeah cause you know things never get better or cheaper with time.

    14. Re:quality by b0bby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the article, it'll cost $22000, have a range of 62 miles, and be available outside China in 2011.

      It's a plug in hybrid; the 62 mile range is on batteries alone, then the gas engine can kick in. It's a long way from being good with batteries to making a good car, though.

    15. Re:quality by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      The Pinto was a deathtrap, sure, but not the Corvair.

      Ok, let me qualify that. The latter half-shaft Corvairs, particulary the rare turbocharged ones, were to die for. The early Corvairs, the half-shaft models with the control rod omitted, were to die in. To be fair though, you could just as easily die in a swing-axle Porsche 956, which could just as easily surprise you by swapping ends and spearing off the road backwards. And a deathtrap is a deathtrap, whether there's a law against inadequate design or not.

      Mind you, I think people, if they know a car is a deathtrap, still have a right to buy and operate one. I'm a motor racing fan. Provided it's not someone else's death, of course. The right of one man to throw a punch ends at another man's jaw.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    16. Re:quality by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, caffieneometer is in the red zone. I meant to say "the early Corvairs, the swing-axle models".

      Oh, and I take absolutely no exception with your statement that Ralph Nader was a self-serving prick. It's quite common for lawmakers to find their way into office with a straw man in the passenger seat. Case in point: look at what Harry J. Ainslinger did in the 1930's with hemp use. Good chronicle of this in Allan Ginsberg's "The Marijuana Papers" which may be out of print by now.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    17. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so god damn funny about that?

      Huh, I seem to recall a similar attitude to Japanese automakers when GM and Ford couldn't produce a car that wouldn't rust out in a year.

      Yea, Slashdot modding this as funny. And you wonder why libertarians take so much heat.

      Slashdot is full of insight. Geopolitics and basic sociological economics is not included.

    18. Re:quality by cgenman · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a lot of sour grapes in these comments. The chinese did it first. It might be good, it might not. But they actually got something out the door under 100k dollars, which we have so far been unable to do.

      All the rest is speculation. Hopefully it will be good, and the technology will trickle into the domestic automobile market. And if not, we will learn from the example. But either way, this is pushing technology forward for all of us.

    19. Re:quality by aqk · · Score: 1

      more power to them.... .. ....

          No, LESS power to them, but more power to the car, uhh... no less power to ..., uhh..

        oh, wait...
        .

    20. Re:quality by LifesRoadie · · Score: 1

      I'm just concerned about what will happen when the batteries need replacing.

      All the low emission credentials go out the window and become highly toxic heavy metal pollution. ...And the Chinese record of caring for their population by not allowing pollution into their lives is not what you'd call exemplary.

      Swap car fumes for heavy metal poisoning anyone?

      Obesa Cantavit

    21. Re:quality by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      It's a plug in hybrid; the 62 mile range is on batteries alone, then the gas engine can kick in.

      TFA says nothing about it having an engine as a secondary power source. The headline refers to it as an electric car (which would imply electric-only), but "hybrid" (which somewhat implies more than one power source, though GM doesn't plan on calling the Volt a hybrid and it definitely has an engine as well as a battery pack) appears a few times in the body text. Is there a better article out there that isn't as ambiguous?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    22. Re:quality by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      "The Pinto was a deathtrap, sure"

      In fact it was at safer than its competitors, overall. I vaguely remember that from 2 million pintos sold, fewer than 100 deaths resulted from fuel tank fires, slightly better than average for that class of car at the time, and of course far short of 'thousands' that court case publicity stated.

    23. Re:quality by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > But they actually got something out the door under 100k dollars, which we have so far been unable to do.

      That is not strictly true.

      The Canadians have a 50K electric vehicle that I would actually want to own/drive.

      Both the Phoenix and Telsa represent cars I would be interested in owning
      and driving. That's a non-trivial aspect of all of this. While the Chinese
      offering probably represents much needed progress in this area, it's still
      probably the electric car equivalent of a Lada or Yugo or Chevette.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:quality by xaositects · · Score: 1

      just don't lick the paint

    25. Re:quality by b0bby · · Score: 1

      The second linked article makes it more explicit.

    26. Re:quality by neltana · · Score: 1

      How was the Pinto a death trap? Especially when compared to other subcompacts of the time, it had fewer deaths per million vehicles on the road. It even had a lower rate of fatality due to fire than other sub-compacts.

      It is only for fires caused from rear collisions that it had a higher fatality rate.

      It had a design defect, to be sure. But the overall safety of the car was pretty much average for its class.

      Now, the VW Beetle was a deathtrap! It had a 10-20% higher fatality rate than the Pinto.

      Damn Germans!

    27. Re:quality by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
      From the linked article, next to last paragraph:

      .

      BYD's hybrid car has a small gasoline engine as a back up.

    28. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, since when is a Hybrid Gas-Electric an Electric-only car?

      And if they are planning on selling 10,000 cars for $22,000, why would anyone buy one? I mean really, that's $2.02 per car and how long is a car under $5.00 going to last anyhow?

      But on a more serious note:
      A car is not "Affordable" until a minimum-wage employee can buy one on a 3-year payment schedule without going broke or homeless.

      I'm sick of seeing this type of crap marketing... "Affordable $22,000 car". I can buy a fucking HOUSE for $22k.

    29. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you $100 that, there is going to be a sticker that reads "Made in China" underneath the car.

    30. Re:quality by lavardo · · Score: 1

      . "more power to them" ?

      Well, they already have all the power since everything is made in China...They already are THE power.

  2. I'll believe it when I see it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Vaporware. Woo Hoo Hoo.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by DeadDecoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I kinda doubt Warren Buffett would invest in vaporware....

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well that was a complete non-sequitur and kinda rude. My point was that Warren Buffet (one of the richest men in the world) has made his fortune by investing in companies that actually turn a profit as opposed to typical speculation. Because of his past success and a 10% stake, there's a chance that the Chinese car is not vaporware.

      Now your comment implies that I am somehow responsible for the current financial crisis either because I make speculative investments or take out/issue bad loans, perhaps based on what Warren Buffet does. Those implications aren't true, nor do they have any bearing on the comment I made. So, I can only assume you're trolling for easy mod points.

      You should stop because it only makes you look like an idiot.

    4. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I read this whole thread. I think that entitles *ME* to the title of idiot, you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your entire proof that Buffet has any interest in this venture is a story on Slashdot. That makes you the idiot.

      Curiously, I do not share your sentiment about the other poster.

      I am, however, fairly confident that you are an imbecile.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    6. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rated -1, Smug as Fuck

    7. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      http://www.zapworld.com/electric-vehicles/electric-cars/xebra-sedan

      For the fully electric version.

      It's been available in the states for 2 years now.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      I thought the financial problems were due to folks being idiots with their money, not being risky with it. I think there's a difference between 'Let's see how this turns out' and 'All aboard the bubble!'

    9. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.zapworld.com/electric-vehicles/electric-cars/xebra-sedan

      For the fully electric version.

      It's been available in the states for 2 years now.

      That thing looks like it would be safer itf it were actually made out of LEGO. Might have more pickup too, judging by the looks of it. :p

    10. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. you go back in your safe Escalade EXT and cower in fear.

      The rest of us who actually have a brain will drive smaller cars.

    11. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      That's a bit expensive for a local-roads-only vehicle. I can think of only a few applications where I'd prefer that to something like this: http://soundspeedscooters.com/store/vehicles/evt-4000e-electric-vespa-lead-acid.html

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    12. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank your US government and it's laws for that price.

      ZAP has been trying to get high efficiency and electric cars here for 4 years now at affordable prices. but the retarded safety laws cause them to have to retrofit the cars in a way that doubles the price. The Smart fourTwo would be $4,000 cheaper if it was not for the ridiculous things they had to do to it to "Americanize" it.

      Sorry but the 5mph bumper is a stupid thing along with several other "laws" that are there to simply make the US car makers more competitive with the foreign car makers.

    13. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. you go back in your safe Escalade EXT and cower in fear.

      The rest of us who actually have a brain will drive smaller cars.

      First up, I live in a civilized city where I don't even need to own a car. We have things called trains, the subway in particular for NYC.

      Second, that car looks like a deathtrap. I doubt it would slow down a VW Rabbit, a Dodge Neon or a Pirus, much less a lovely and well engineered Civic or Camry hybrid.

      I'm fine with small cars, or a bike if it's sunny and flat. But that linked car literally looks like one of the little police trike's with the LEGO looking external frame.... minus the external safety frame.
      http://photos.uncivilservants.org/1/post/d/main_7403.jpeg

  3. Re:first first by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    [citation needed]

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  4. Red Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this article red because its about the Chinese?

    1. Re:Red Article? by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1

      I would like to know the reason behind the red articles too, as this has been reported several times now, once even visible by me. I think it might have to do with the fact that there are no comments (in the cache) at the exact moment we view the front page, or because it is brand spanking new.

      Taco and Hemos haven't commented since Idle was announced, so if somebody has any idea as to what this is please - do tell.

    2. Re:Red Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the titles turn red if they are too long to be properly displayed.

  5. Charging an electric car by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a little OT but I figure someone here might know. With so many electric cars finally coming to market I thought it would be smart to plan ahead even if I'm not ready to take the leap yet...

    So, I'm in the process of a remodel and have an easy opportunity to install a high-amperage electric circuit to some location in the garage. Is there any emerging standard for charging electric cars that would dictate the ideal location to put the outlet? I.e. in front of the car, driver side, passenger side, what height from ground, etc. Also amperage, type of plug etc would be good to anticipate, although initially I'd just have an empty conduit running there from the load center.

    1. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Extension cord?

    2. Re:Charging an electric car by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My understanding is that most (all?) of these plugin hybrids are being designed to fit a standard household electrical socket. I would think if you have a standard GFI outlet in your garage (and I think just about everyone does) you should be fine. Honestly, I don't see how these things would take off if they required rewiring your house just to be able to recharge them.

    3. Re:Charging an electric car by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Front connectivity seems most common to me (businesses, parking stalls, charging stations). Your choice to have it come in from the left, right or center.

    4. Re:Charging an electric car by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do what they do for gasoline pumps - put it up high on one side, and get a long enough cord to connect it. If you want maximum flexibility, why not connect it to the ceiling above the center of the car (maybe with a small boom to assist with cable management)? That will keep it out of your way while walking around the vehicle, yet still make it visually obvious whenever it is plugged in.

    5. Re:Charging an electric car by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Last I had heard they were tiered. Standard 110v was like 12 hour recharge, 220v (like water heater or dryer) was like 4 hour and a nonstandard 440v could do in 1-2 hours.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Charging an electric car by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      A standard outlet delivers at most enough power to run a vacuum cleaner. At that rate, you're going to be recharging for something on the order of one hour for each mile driven. Maybe they can charge from a regular outlet in case of emergency, but that would not be suitable for daily recharging.

    7. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If possible, run two.... one near where drivers side fuel door would be and one where passengers side would be.... or in a 2 car garage that has a post in the center, run it to the post... then you can do drivers side of the righthand stall and passengers side of the lefthand stall.

      I would run 50 amp 220 and 50 amp 110.

      Worst case, if you're wrong, at least you'll have power there that you could use to plug in an emergency backup generator, etc.. and shut off the main breaker, and backfeed from your high amp breaker, into the main box and feed the rest of the house off of it. Lots of rural people I know run their generators that way so that they still have heat and water when the power goes out. They can also run a welder off of the outlet if needed.

    8. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, just like Top Gear's review of the Tesla yesterday.

      Brilliant.

      What, 14 hours to recharge? 55 mile range (instead of the advertised 200+).

      Then they looked at Honda's hydrogen/electric car and decided that was the future. Not home-charged electric vehicles that can't recharge in under half a day. You certainly need something a lot better than 13A @ 230V - maybe a 200A circuit would help things. 400A in 110V countries ...

    9. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just run an empty conduit for now. People are already using high power chargers for their homemade EVs:

      It's possible, though unlikely, that a plug-in hybrid will use anything other than a standard 120v 15A outlet for now (even though it's less than ideal)

    10. Re:Charging an electric car by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      A standard outlet delivers at most enough power to run a vacuum cleaner. At that rate, you're going to be recharging for something on the order of one hour for each mile driven. Maybe they can charge from a regular outlet in case of emergency, but that would not be suitable for daily recharging.

      Most of the world runs on 220-250V. I think the US made a bad guess with 110V. It is too expensive to deliver high current at low voltage.

    11. Re:Charging an electric car by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      a 20 amp outlet at 120V is capable of putting out over 3 horsepower. So in ten hours could put out the power to run fully loaded 30 horsepower motor one hour.

    12. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Volt seems to be putting it on the driver's side front. It seems there is a good reason for this: It greatly reduces your chance of driving off with the cord plugged in. As such, expect variants on frontal placement to win out over time.

      (In fact, one would hope there'd be other failsafes for drive-offs, but it's probably better to let you scoot around while plugged than risk disabling the whole vehicle because of a fault in a 'charger present' switch or detection circuit.)

    13. Re:Charging an electric car by Trahloc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My vote would if you can, bring 480v 3-phase into the garage, plop down a small transformer, and then you can use 240v, 208v, 120v, all at the same time if you need to. Whatever power options win out you'll be set to take advantage of. Just leave some space for whatever primary charging standard wins out, but in the mean time you can have him install ALL the current standard XXXv 20/30amp sockets.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    14. Re:Charging an electric car by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      ...but that would not be suitable for daily recharging.

      Surely that depends entirely upon how far you drive and how much time you spend at a place with a socket each day. For some people, the specs of the Tesla would be more than enough. It also depends on if you have another vehicle to use, and if you want to use it to go on long trips in etc.

    15. Re:Charging an electric car by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      55 mile range (instead of the advertised 200+).

      I think you will find the 200 mile range, like every other range spec, is dependent on your driving style. Thrashing any car, petrol or electric, consumes much more than when driving normally. Tesla were not being deceiving at all, from what I've read.

    16. Re:Charging an electric car by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Most of the world runs on 220-250V. I think the US made a bad guess with 110V. It is too expensive to deliver high current at low voltage.

      Not a bad guess but a conscious choice. Split-phase systems like we have in the US allow for a self-balancing load to a neutral return split between two lower voltage conductors. The lower voltage also results in a less dangerous ground-fault than 220V single-wire systems when used for small appliances while still providing 220V (if needed) by attaching a load between the two phases directly.

      So really, the US chose safety and flexibility at the cost of requiring more copper, rather than going with the more dangerous (but cheaper to implement) "one voltage fits all, one conductor feeds all" path of 220V everywhere.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Charging an electric car by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      My vote would if you can, bring 480v 3-phase into the garage, plop down a small transformer, and then you can use 240v, 208v, 120v, all at the same time if you need to.

      Snort. I dunno, maybe I don't hang out with a rich enough crowd, but it seems to me that having a 3-5 thousand dollar power center installed because a future electric car MIGHT use a 480V charging system seems a bit extravagant. I reckon he ought to just have 1.25" EMT run from the panel to a box in the garage and wait till he knows what the car needs.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:Charging an electric car by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Did you just say 400A? Holy shit that would be dangerous!

    19. Re:Charging an electric car by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Since there is tesla coils on the front page, what about a huge fucking tesla coil in your garage? Waste of energy you say? So what =P, no need to figure where to put the plug.

      Imagine huge ones tens of meters at major roads leaving cities, like "you are now leaving ..." and kazaam, car charged for your trip to the next city =P

      Or maybe not, but it would look cool =P

    20. Re:Charging an electric car by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      That's what I've done (though not for charging a car). I have a 20 amp 110 and a compressed air hose coming down from the ceiling on a rotating boom (like at the self serve car washes). It kicks ass for availability when working on a car.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    21. Re:Charging an electric car by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      why not run 50 amp 220 + neutral. Then you can draw 100 amp as 2x50 amp 110's or a single 220 at 50A.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    22. Re:Charging an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air resistance goes up as the cube of speed. Gas powered cars only get 25% their sticker mileage when raced like Top Gear did too.

      The 16 hour charge is nasty, but keep in mind that's from flat to full on generic wiring. If you have the cash to plot on a $100k sportscar, you'd probably set up something beefier for the garage plug. (A little digging online says the same setup that was recommended for the old EV1 would completely charge a Tesla in 10 hours).

      These are pretty favorable numbers for their eventual "normal" car, actually. The average daily round trip commute is well under 100 miles, and you're home for 8-14 hours before you go out again the next morning but it'd only take 5 hours to regain that half-charge. You won't be doing 110mph on back roads into work, I would hope...

    23. Re:Charging an electric car by gboss · · Score: 1

      It is only dangerous if your conductors are not sized correctly for it...

    24. Re:Charging an electric car by Agripa · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the front right corner of the car would be the best place to put the outlet or charging station. Parking in the US is usually off of the right side or the front of the car. For the circuit, I would run a 240 volt with neutral at 30 amps which should cover most configurations without undue cost and should be available in any house.

    25. Re:Charging an electric car by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      And that's why there are no Earth connections on US power points?
      And why don't most power points have an 'OFF' switch?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    26. Re:Charging an electric car by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      And that's why there are no Earth connections on US power points?

      Assuming that by "power point" you mean power outlet (what does Microsoft have to do with power outlets? :-) ), of course our outlets have ground connections. They're the U-shaped terminals seen here that take the round pin on the plug.

      And why don't most power points have an 'OFF' switch?

      Umm...because most electrical devices have switches of their own? Only place I've seen switches next to every f'n outlet was England, and I wondered what the point was of such needless redundancy. (Then again, England is also the country where you have to buy and install plugs on the cords of every electrical device before you can even plug it in because there are something like three or four different types of wall outlets in use depending on the age of your home (or, if your home was really old and retrofitted for electricity at some point, the age of said retrofit).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Charging an electric car by blake182 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't see how these things would take off if they required rewiring your house just to be able to recharge them.

      This is a perfectly valid sentiment, but given the realities of physics right now, I think it's inevitable.

      Let's do some quick math. Essentially what we're talking about is the maximum amount of juice you can pump through a "normal plug". So this is 120 volts at a maximum of, let's say, 30 amps. If you plugged your car in, and it was perfectly efficient recharging the batteries, each hour you'd replenish 120 * 30 = 3600 watt hours of energy, or 3.6 kilowatt hours. Consulting the chart of gasoline gallon equivalents, you see that you need about 33.56 killowatt hours to equal one gallon of gasoline. So it's ten hours to get the equivalent of one gallon of gas in your car using a normal plug.

      Now, if you up the voltage to 240 volts and the amperage to 70 amps, you get 16.8 kilowatt-hours from a one hour charge, which is better -- now we're up to two hours for a gallon of gas.

      Now we get into "mileage". I've seen electric cars that can go 100 miles on 33.56 kilowatt hours. So for a range of 100 miles, you need to charge for two hours at 240 volts / 70 amps vs. ten hours at 120 volts and 30 amps. For some people, this is probably acceptable. For some people, they probably want the beefy charging infrastructure.

    28. Re:Charging an electric car by raynet · · Score: 1

      55 mile range on the Top Gear track is not bad considering that many of the cars they run on that track manage to get one or two MPGs.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    29. Re:Charging an electric car by damburger · · Score: 1

      Don't know when you last visited England, but at 27 I cannot remember any other kind of socket than the one we have now.

      And wants the problem with having a switch next to every socket? It resolves idiotic standby issues by making sure your appliance is actually turned off and also it is safer in case some kid sticks something into the live hole.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    30. Re:Charging an electric car by vuo · · Score: 1

      European houses are directly wired to three-phase 400 V power, from which single-phase 240 V "wall socket" power is extracted at the circuit breaker. However, because the 400 V is wired directly to the house, there's usually at least one 400 V socket in the garage. It might be easier to adopt electric cars in Europe for this reason.

    31. Re:Charging an electric car by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's feasible in your situation, but I'd put a box on the ceiling in the garage right above your car. From there I'd use a length of flexible cable (perhaps on a retractor) to plug into your car. That way it would matter where the plug was on your car or whether you drove in or backed in to the garage. At least in the US you can always use a larger gauge wire in place of a smaller one, so if you're in the situation where you must decide now before you close a wall up, I'd run 3 conductors of #6 or #4 (two hot, one neutral) and one ground conductor of whatever gauge your jurisdiction requires (where I am, you generally dfon't need a ground larger than #10 solid copper). That way you can do 110 or 220 at up to 100A - that's 22kW at 220V/100A (that's half the current rating of my whole breaker panel). Good luck!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    32. Re:Charging an electric car by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Wait, what has voltage got to do with that ? If the only problem was voltage, would it not be simpler for them to add a small transformer into the design to get the voltage up to the required 440 V from the 110/200/220 V ?
      Or even simpler a separate wiring that puts batteries in parallel for charging and in series for running the car.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    33. Re:Charging an electric car by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Don't know when you last visited England, but at 27 I cannot remember any other kind of socket than the one we have now.

      I lived there for two years from '84 to '86. The 13A plugs with rectangular pins were the most common type, but I'd swear I saw older-type 5A and 15A outlets (that took plugs with round pins) at least once or twice.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    34. Re:Charging an electric car by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      So, I'm in the process of a remodel and have an easy opportunity to install a high-amperage electric circuit to some location in the garage. Is there any emerging standard for charging electric cars that would dictate the ideal location to put the outlet? I.e. in front of the car, driver side, passenger side, what height from ground, etc. Also amperage, type of plug etc would be good to anticipate, although initially I'd just have an empty conduit running there from the load center.

      I think this is going to be trickier then you realize. The simplest answer is to run the same kind of circuit that you would use for an electric dryer or electric stove; although the kind of circuit run varies depending on your electrical service.

      The US is standardized on outlets providing 120 volts, single phase, 60hz. Most circuits are 15 amps; although 20 is the maximum allowed in residential wiring. (20-amp outlets have that T-shaped wider prong so you can't plug a 20-amp device into a 15-amp circuit.) The Chevy Volt will charge off of a 15-amp circuit; and it's sounding like it'll need 4 hours to charge for 40 miles.

      Things get weirder when you want to go for a higher level of current. 30 amp 120-volt circuits are illegal in residential wiring for a very good reason: If you were to plug a run-of-the-mill extension cord into a 30-amp circuit, you could start a fire if you actually pulled 30 amps of power!

      For 240 volt circuits, like what dryers and electric stoves use; the outlet varies depending on the kind of electric service to your home and local electrical code. Thus, it's difficult to standardize for cars because there are a few different standards throughout the US. I know of "single-phase", "three-phase", and "three-phase with a high leg." In all cases; it's trivial to make a standard 120-volt circuit, however, high-voltage equipment needs to be designed to handle the kind of electric service at your home.

      Thus, run the highest voltage circuit that your electrical service allows. It'll be trivial to add a standard 120-volt outlet to the circuit. When standards for high-voltage automotive charging appear, you'll be able to easily install the correct equipment as the circuit already exists.

    35. Re:Charging an electric car by zeet · · Score: 1

      Run conduit back to your main box. When you decide to get an electric car, pull wire into it for whatever needs to be wired up.

      Conduit is almost always the answer to future needs. Pulling is a non-issue for short runs once you have a safe tube to put the wire or cable into.

  6. Anyone can make an electric car by No2Gates · · Score: 0

    Does this mean it's reliable?
    Is it made of Melamine like all their food?
    I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore. How much food is recalled and childrens toys? Do you want to be in an accident in one of these things and then find out that to cut costs, they used cheap air-bags?

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    1. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore. How much food is recalled and childrens toys? Do you want to be in an accident in one of these things and then find out that to cut costs, they used cheap air-bags?

      Another reason to avoid Chinese goods (if their human rights record isn't good enough) is that their industry is ecologically harmful. Chinese industry have little incentive not to polute the environment in some of the most egregious ways.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean it's reliable?

      No, it doesn't exist yet.

      Is it made of Melamine like all their food?

      You're planning on eating the thing? Interesting.

      I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore.

      Don't eat random products made anywhere.

      How much food is recalled and childrens toys?

      Boy, you're really hungry, aren't you? Shouldn't eat toys.

      Do you want to be in an accident in one of these things and then find out that to cut costs, they used cheap air-bags?

      No, I don't want to be in an accident in anything small. I want to be in an accident in my 3/4 ton 4WD pickup.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

      I want to be in an accident in my 3/4 ton 4WD pickup.> The train will win ... and I doubt 4WD will make a difference. I, for one, welcome the opportunity to never get in an accident.

    4. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I want to be in an accident in my 3/4 ton 4WD pickup.

      I, on the other hand, would rather avoid an accident entirely by being in a smaller car with a lower center of gravity and that has more maneuverability than a beached whale.

    5. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I am thrilled about BYD's F3DM, I think it's the kind of car the world, especially the US needs.

      That said, I think your attack on the grandparent post is slightly (not completely) unjust. Give him/her some credit: Chinese food is, undoubtedly, a health hazard. China is a huge country, with lots of people and a disproportionate amount of corruption. Very weak to non-existent consumer protection. And a LONG history of contaminated, toxic food. If you concentrate only on the melamine stories of late, you miss the much bigger picture.

      So, I think the grandparent post deserves to be taken into at least some consideration. Do not eat food from China, seems like a wise guideline.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, give us light weight single person vehicles now!

      I would want one of these KMX trikes with electronic motor:
      http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oK4FOv4FD1Q

      Good enough for my purposes, just put a plastic wind shield / roof and some bags on it to.

      Since it's winter now just the trike would be sufficient to, less risk of crashing than on a two wheeler.

    7. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Check the history of three wheeled vehicles.

      It's a case of a compromise being worse then ether option.

      4 wheels give good stability, 2 wheels banks turns so with skill it handles corners and irregular surfaces fine.

      3 wheels sucks. It can't bank and is much less stable in the roll axis then a four wheeled vehicle of the same width. It doesn't matter which end you put two wheels on. Tricycles suck.

      There is a reason they banned 3 wheel ATVs, while leaving dirt bikes and 4 wheel ATVs alone.

      'They' will ban three wheel road vehicles eventually.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Do I hear the whine of a sorry loser here?

      The Chinese are not much worse than what most of us in the West have been, or in some cases still are. Based on hearsay, you judge a whole nation for what some of them do - the Chinese central government is among the most progressive when it comes to the environment, just to take one thing. And while you summarily judge the whole of China, I have a strong suspicion that you expect to get away with saying things like "Hey, I didn't vote for Bush" when people criticise the actions of your own nation. That's hypocrisy.

      The simple fact is that China is fast becoming a strong contender for the leadership of the world, while America has been falling back for something like 8 years or so.

    9. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but...its over THERE.

    10. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen some of the situations in China? Drainage ditches filled with shattered CRTs, people smelting PCBsby hand over open flames, electronics junkyards the size of cities?

      I could care less how "progressive" a government is if they've spent the last 20 years profiting from turning their nation into a giant dump for hazardous waste.

      I'm sure it's all just hearsay and hyperbole, just like when someone tries to tell me about the existance of Russia.

    11. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Check the actual video before replying ...

      4 wheeled BIKE would look even lamer and probably turn worse and also have even more resistance.

      What is "bank"?

      Make the three-wheeler tilt when turning and it will be easier o handle centrifugal forces.

      A three wheeled ATV will have the centrum of the weight much higher up from the ground and also higher compared to the wheels.

      And a "safety bike" probably want to tilt much more, though wheels spinning and ones own ability to balance it out helps, but a bike which tilt on itself won't flip over at a turn either.

      http://www.jetrike.com/prior-art.html

    12. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen some of the situations in China?

      I am married to a Chinese, speak Chinese and have traveled extensively in China. So yes, I have. And you?

      I could care less how "progressive" a government is if they've spent the last 20 years profiting from turning their nation into a giant dump for hazardous waste.

      Not so long ago America was by far the greatest environmental sinner, yet nobody would say that it was the American government that committed those sins, despite the fact that they encouraged them by turning a blind eye. The Chinese government, by contrast, is not turning a blind eye - they are actively trying to repair the damage caused by overexploitation. But China is a huge country with far more people than the US and far less resources to push through their will than most Western countries. The many examples of environment destruction and corruption in China are caused, not by the Communist government, but by the scum the floats to the surface in the new, open-market economy. The Capitalists, in other words.

    13. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore.

      Stuff from China is crap. It's crap because of one of two reasons. Either we tell them to make it like crap (and I've seen that happen) or we tell them to make it well, they don't, then we accept it and sell it anyway. When there are no specifications, they will pick the cheapest way of doing it. Lead paint in the kids toys? No one told them not to. If you specify "no lead paint" and they do it anyway, then that's another issue. But that's why when you outsource production you send along some expensive American QC engineers, right?

      Every problem with Chinese products I've seen, I'd blame on the American company.

    14. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That human rights is political, this is consumer related. If you plan to critique at least understand what you are saying first...

    15. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I''m headed to China in about 6 months, until then you'll have to settle for me working in the electronics disposal industry, spending day in and day out trying to explain to people exactly why it's cheaper to throw all their old equipment in a shipping container and ship it overseas instead of dealing with it responsibly.

      Far less resources?

      I bet 2.25 Million active duty soldiers of the PLA could be really effective in stopping the importation of electronics waste. There are plenty of nations in western Africa trying to prevent the exact same situation, they've banned the import and simply lack the manpower to enforce such a ban. China can pump money into the Great Firewall and buying up fleets of old Russian subs but they can't control imports into their country if they wanted to?

      I'm not clearing the U.S. of anything, all that shit comes from somewhere and we both know exactly where that is. I'm just saying, putting forth a plan to build an entirely green city strikes me more as a propaganda shot than a move to clean up the country.

    16. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a cunt, do you hear me? A cunt. Go kiss up to your Chinese overlord, you pussy.

    17. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean it's reliable?
      Is it made of Melamine like all their food?
      I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore. How much food is recalled and childrens toys? Do you want to be in an accident in one of these things and then find out that to cut costs, they used cheap air-bags?

      I hear people say this all the time. I even heard someone say it in the checkout line at Wal-Mart.

      Just so you know, if you shop at Wallie's, you're pretty much guaranteed to be buying Chinese.... & if you aren't directly buying a Chinese product, you're still supporting one of the largest importers of Chinese goods.

      At the end of the day, we will continue to buy Chinese because we are a bunch of cheapskates in the States these days.

      As for their car... they aren't going to sell very many over here for that price. Knock it down to $2,200 and they'll sell like hotcakes.

    18. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jandersen · · Score: 1

      You're a cunt, do you hear me? A cunt. Go kiss up to your Chinese overlord, you pussy.

      There, there, feeling better now? Yes, I hear you. Would you care to elaborate? 'Cause I don't really see why facing reality is a bad thing. Loving our own country shouldn't blind us to how things are going in the world; whether America is a great nation has little to do with its military or economic power, and everything to do with the American people.

    19. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jandersen · · Score: 1

      I''m headed to China in about 6 months

      Good on you - but if you are going there to "Preach the White Man's Gospel", you will be considered an obnoxious idiot, and rightly so. If you go there to learn and to hear what they have to say for themselves, you will have a good time.

      I bet 2.25 Million active duty soldiers of the PLA could be really effective in stopping the importation of electronics waste.

      Yeah, sure. However, just like in most other countries, soldiers are there for a military purpose, not to carry out policing, which is a part of the civilian authorities. Apart from that, I don't think it is a simple as that - there are things the WTO and the possible impact on employment and economy to consider, among other things. I have no doubt the government intends to tackle this issue; they are not idiots, and they generally seem to want to do the right thing, but you know just as well as I do, that a government can't just make changes overnight. It is never just black or white - perhaps they ought to have done more to protect the environment, that is certainly a fair criticism, as opposed to yelling "You have to everything right, or else you're useless and evil".

    20. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a Communist traitor and should be shot.

    21. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I avoid any products made in China now because I can't trust them anymore.

      you're kind of missing out. there are these music players and phones that people in the US seem to like that you should check out

    22. Re:Anyone can make an electric car by jandersen · · Score: 1

      You are a Communist traitor and should be shot.

      A traitor pretends to be a friend, but betrays you behind your back. I, on the other hand, speak my opinions openly; thus I am not a traitor. In fact, I am not even an enemy of America. Whether I am your enemy is up to you - it takes two to be friends, but you can be an enemy all on your own.

  7. Bye, bye GM :) by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Detroit wasn't interested...someone had to get on with it.

    GM killed electric trolley public transportation on the East Coast decades ago, pushing for city buses made by GMC that used internal combustion. The VOLT was promoted using jazzy images of impressive body lines that promoted interest, only to release a breadbox as the final design. GM doesn't want the VOLT to succeed, and now with their imminent demise, they may get their wish.

    BYD will be in NA in short time, and more like them will follow. I wish them best of luck.

    1. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by sokoban · · Score: 1

      BYD will be in NA in short time

      And will probably be here long time.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    2. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      [The VOLT was promoted using jazzy images of impressive body lines that promoted interest, only to release a breadbox as the final design. GM doesn't want the VOLT to succeed...]
      Here we go again...

      The original design was so un-aerodynamic that Bob Lutz said it was almost better if they put the car in the wind tunnel backward. That's why it was changed.

    3. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but first they have to ensure that the cabin does better in safety tests.

      http://jalopnik.com/cars/news/chinese-suv-scores-zero-in-european-safety-test-126200.php

    4. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [GM killed electric trolley public transportation on the East Coast decades ago, pushing for city buses made by GMC that used internal combustion.]
      Not so fast...
      http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=30
      http://www.1134.org/stan/ul/GM-et-al.html

    5. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      ...The VOLT was promoted using jazzy images of impressive body lines that promoted interest, only to release a breadbox as the final design. GM doesn't want the VOLT to succeed...

      I believe you.

      General Motors is very competent in the area of marketing memes. They know exactly what impression a name will have on the buying public. The very name VOLT in upper case invokes the image of a brush against an electrified fence, not a family-friendly econo people carrier.

      This is a bit more subtle, however, than there previous attempt at not selling a car the public demands -- the Chevy Impact. As me friends might say, "subtle as a 'frown brick".

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    6. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Gaaak! Their previous attempt. THEIR.

      Dobby must be punished.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Nope. GM gambled pretty much everything on Volt's success: http://gm-volt.com/2008/12/15/gm-plans-to-build-a-strong-hybrid-small-vehicle-but-will-spend-twice-as-much-developing-e-flex-cars/

      E-Flex cars are now their top priority in funding. Also, IMO the 'generic' design for Volts is a plus. GM tells us Volts are not going to be exotic items, but rather a good old boring automobile which will JustWork(tm).

      Also, I don't expect much success with the first models. They are probably going to explode/burn/crash too much. GM is in a better position here - they are performing thorough testing of battery and drivetrain. I don't expect the same level of testing on Chinese models.

    8. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Informative

      the volt was originally developed in germany by opel anyway.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    9. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      So, let's see. GM is burning 3 billion a month. A typical product development program costs 1 to 6 billion over 4 years.

      I rather think they bet the farm on making unsaleable unprofitable cars, the Volt is just one last fart of activity from a decaying corpse.

    10. Re:Bye, bye GM :) by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Volt is not going to be very successful. It's too expensive for that (estimated to cost around $30000 with tax breaks in effect) - battery costs too much and nobody (including small players like Tesla) has experience in making durable lithium batteries for cars.

      But Volt's successors are going to be cheap _and_ reliable enough. GM has a very good chance to beat other significant players to the market.

      PS: GM has not stopped or slowed Volt's development program _even_ _now_ when GM doesn't have enough spare cash to buy a bottle of Pepsi.

  8. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, we're getting tired of this shit.

    There is an art to good trolling. Copying and pasting that tired old waste of screen real estate ain't gonna cut it anymore. It was only funny the first 5 times.

    Slashdot's intellectual standards for posting are higher than the norm and here, troll posts are no exception. Do your damn homework and come back with a comprehensive proof of the theory that one's penis size is inversely proportional to their brainpower and use a survey of races and ethnicities to prove your point. The penis size debate(www.penissizedebate.com) is a good starting point of what should constitute a lengthy(no pun intended) troll post.

  9. Which is it? by thered2001 · · Score: 2

    A hybrid or an electric? GM, Honda, and Toyota hav all produced hybrids. Tesla produces an impressive electric car. What is new here except that *this* Chinese manufacturer is producing *this* car?

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    1. Re:Which is it? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Price

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Which is it? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is hybrid, it has a backup gasoline engine.
      It's not really new, but it's better than all electric like the Tesla. It may be fast, but as it has been shown in the latest episode of Top Gear, it has a major drawback, recharging time.
      Seeing the hydrogen-powered Honda FCX Clarity in that same episode showed how it can be done practically. Fill up like a gasoline car, be done in two minutes and drive on.
      For those that haven't seen it, info and torrent link here.

      --
      home
    3. Re:Which is it? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK it is the first hybrid car using lithium iron-phosphate batteries. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYD_F3DM.

      This may help them on price/performance, because the raw materials for the batteries are relatively cheap. It is also a good real life test of large batteries of this type. The reliability statistics for this car should give us a good idea of how rugged the new battery tech really is.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    4. Re:Which is it? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      It's both.

      It's a plug-in hybrid, so it runs on straight electricity until you exceed it's base range, then it can self-recharge with gasoline for longer trips.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    5. Re:Which is it? by ptudor · · Score: 1

      My electric scooter uses LiFePo4 batteries. Cuts the overall weight by 20% and improves range+top speed compared to the (at this time) much cheaper VRLAs. It'll be nice when I can buy an Aptera with LiFePo4 batteries.

    6. Re:Which is it? by obscureownership · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen isn't a practical fuel right now for a number of reasons, two of them being that it's inefficient and costly to harvest H2 from water no matter which method used, and the second reason being that one of those methods for harvesting it requires fossil fuels. Fast recharge times for electric cars are just a few years away with R&D where as efficient means of getting H2 are another 30 or 40 years away.

  10. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought I'd say this, but I miss the GNAA. At least they changed portions of their standard troll to include (sometimes humorous) allusions to current events. By today's standards, they were downright brilliant.

  11. red? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot has gone drudge.

  12. Uh, what? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    " hopes its expertise in ferrous battery technology will allow it to leapfrog established car manufacturers"

    Okay, so if I were Goodyear then that would equate to me being able to make a better car because . . .

    Oh, wait . . .

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Uh, what? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Pick a powertrain vendor instead of a tire vendor and you've got an appropriate analogy.

    2. Re:Uh, what? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Rolls Royce plc maybe?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:Uh, what? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Rolls Royce plc maybe?

      Yeah, because they completely suck at making cars... ;-)

    4. Re:Uh, what? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Rolls Royce plc doesn't make cars. The history of the Rolls Royce name is amusing. Simplified: Rolls split into two companies in the 70's. RR Motors made cars, RR plc made and makes engines. More recently, Volkswagen bought RR Motors. But, and this is the best part, RR plc owned the name and sold it to BMW. Volkswagen was pissed to learn they owned the company, but couldn't sell them as Rolls Royce. A deal was worked out, but to this day a decedent of Rolls isn't sold as a Rolls. Buy a Rolls now, and it's really a BMW under the hood.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  13. Re:second post by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    This troll has been used and abused. Changing the main character to Obama does not show any originality. Trolling is an art form when done properly and people will react to wit and originality. This is obviously an amateurish lame attempt.

    If you wish to research proper trolling, I suggest that you browse to: http://www.gnaa.us/ and see how it's done.

    Please refrain from further posts until you build up your troll skill level.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  14. Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That high quality American car is packed to the gunnels with Chinese made parts, including engines.

    About the only thing that is truely american is the arrogance.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Chinese made

      They designed the engines too? I thought all they did was jack the work of others and rebrand it Fhord and GeeM.

    2. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but don't underestimate the challenges involved in actually assembling a good-looking car that's safe and doesn't break.
      Remember the Yugo? Remember how Hyundai was (until recently, anyway)? Hell, (if you're old enough) remember how the Japanese cars once were?

      BYD has shown they know how to build laptop batteries. They may be able to scale it up to automobile level (although this is not trivial).
      However, they have years to go before they are capable of building automobiles that can compete on safety, comfort and reliability against existing auto makers. They may get there eventually, if they survive that long (Hyundai did, Yugo didn't); however, it's definitely not going to be with their first car. This has nothing to do with being Chinese, and everything to do with being new to market. I wouldn't trust Tesla's first car either, although charging $100K each may give Tesla an advantage in that it can afford to do more over-engineering and cherry-pick good parts than BYD can at its price segment.

    3. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about American cars? Oh, I get it. "High quality American cars." You were trying to be funny, weren't you?

    4. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by MukiMuki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's packed with Chinese-made parts that have to adhere to American safety regulations.

      Is this batch of 10,000 going to do the same?

      It's a serious question, btw. At $22k a pop this could very well be the case.

    5. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Facegarden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That high quality American car is packed to the gunnels with Chinese made parts, including engines.

      About the only thing that is truely american is the arrogance.

      Arrogance? You obviously don't know much about chinese cars. It doesn't matter where the parts are made, but american cars aren't ENGINEERED in china. So far all the chinese cars that have been engineered in china have been terrible. I remember one example that looked like any other common car in the US or elsewhere, but it did so poorly in crash testing it couldn't even manage ONE STAR. It was a deathtrap.

      Don't call people arrogant without checking your own ignorance. I'm not saying the car can't be good, but given what has come out of china so far, people have a right to be skeptical.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    6. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      About the only thing that is truely american is the arrogance.

      Best in class baby! USA! USA!
      ...whoops, the steering wheel on my Pontiac caught on fire. [*]

      [*] BTW, this actually happened to me on a 5 year old
      1986 Pontiac Grand Prix while I was driving it.
      I now drive a Toyota.

    7. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually no. There is a LOT of stuff in cars of all brands that is actually made in the U.S. There is also a lot made in other countries. But from what I've seen - working in Detroit for a long time - is that China is not the largest contributor of parts. Go ahead and argue that some Ford cars are assembled in Mexico, while some Toyotas are built in Alabama (not sure that's the right state) but China is not involved in the same way they are with toys for example. I know it's popular to bash Detroit, but this dumping on them with unfounded gibberish is really getting old. When there are 20+ vehicle manufacturers in the US, it's impressive that the 3 still hold as much market share as they do. Someone must be buying the vehicles.

    8. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Grimbleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but don't underestimate the challenges involved in actually assembling a good-looking car that's safe and doesn't break.

      Remember the Yugo? Remember how Hyundai was (until recently, anyway)?

      Remember Chevy? Remember Ford?

      Yeah.

    9. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One thing I have learned is never under estimate the Chinese, this is a country that has had a incredible GDP since the days of the silk road. One could have said the same about IBM and the computer. we all know how that went. It's not hard to reverse engineer and improve upon an existing design. The only hard part is consumer confidence and brand recognition. US Automaker have done such a good job of killing consumer confidence that most Americans no longer care where it's made cept the fact of the economy

    10. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by hb253 · · Score: 1

      gunwales

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    11. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by droopycom · · Score: 1

      Thats why I have a "German" car .... full of Mexican made parts!

      Damn you Volkswagen!

    12. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > ...whoops, the steering wheel on my Pontiac caught on fire. [*]
      >[*] BTW, this actually happened to me on a 5 year old
      >1986 Pontiac Grand Prix while I was driving it.

      Well that's quite an unfortunate incident. Have you ever figured out what caused it? Perhaps there's been a recall for this issue, like with the whole heated washer fluid fire thing.

      > I now drive a Toyota.

      Oh, I'm sorry.

    13. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was told wiring in the column. The dealer fixed it for free even though the warranty had expired. IIRC they referred to it as an 'after warranty adjustment'. (and I made a typo, it was a 1989 Grand Prix not 1986)

    14. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      That is beyond ignorant, American cars are made with parts that are manufactured in North America, not China.

      Ford/GM/Chrysler engines are NOT made in China, but in the USA/Canada/Mexico. In fact very little is made in China.

    15. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Which is why I quit buying it. Not only is the quality lousy, but I hate the fact that China ties their Yuen to the Dollar. By 2004, they were suppose to have dropped their trade barriers and have untied their money. They created a "basket" that is a total joke and their barriers are still up as high as ever. China is now pushing to keep things like the way they are until 2020. They are also trying to do the same with EU. Between the low quality and horrible politics, I refuse to buy from a number of these companies include GM and Chrysler.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmmm. American safety regulations that American car builders always obey. They would never knowingly design a car that had tanks that blew up, or SUVs that easily rolled, or bought tires that had highspeed blowouts. And they would stand behind them, right?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    17. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      GM announced back in August that they had a number of plants and China and like the PROFIT so much that they were going to move a great deal more work there. A lot is made there with more to come. That is why I say that any of the 3 that wants a loan or a break-up needs to move the jobs back here and need to be broken up. I am not wild about subsidizing these 3, but I hate paying to ship our jobs to country that does not play fair on the economic front. And while I believe that we do need to tweak NAFTA, I have little issues with Mexico, and the rest of the west; money to freely traded. Overall borders are open (though Mexico needs to drop some of their restrictions).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://dictionary.die.net/gunnel

      They're interchangeable.

    19. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by JWSmythe · · Score: 0, Troll

          It really depends on the car. Sure, the cheap ones have a lot of Asian parts.

          My car is a good ol' American car (kinda). 2000 Pontiac Firebird TransAm WS/6, a product of General Motors. It was assembled in Canada. :)

          The engine is an LS1. The engine block is cast in Ontario, Canada.

          I'm pretty sure the body sheet metal and plastics were made in Canada, but I couldn't find a reference for that.

          When I changed my water pump and power steering pump, they both had "Made In Canada" stickers on them.

          The radio is a Delco/Delphi Monsoon. Delphi has (or had) 29 plants in the US, and others worldwide.

          There are various Bosch products in the car too. Those were likely manufactured in the United States, but I believe they have worldwide operations also.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course they have plants in China! They make cars in China for the Chinese...

    21. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Toyota trucks are made in San Antonio, TX.

      We were all excited when they came here. There were lines for miles for people applying.

      It was to be THE place to work.

    22. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      that and the tesla is build on top of a lotue elise chassis.
      That bit of engineering was not trivial, and they nicely sidestepped it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      honestly, while you are trolling, I don't believe they would knowingly design a car with those issues.
      Problem is not that the design happened and made it through testing... problem is what they did after the problem was known.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    24. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with jobs being exported to China but not Mexico?

      It's the same fucking thing.

      I have watched the company I work for (KCI) strip our manuafctoring jobs and send them to Mexico (and Ireland) while people who worked for 15 years get told their jobs have been reassigned.

      That's the new lingo "reassigned." You're not layed off anymore, you are simple not assigned to work.

      And they do it for the same reason as China. Lower taxes, lower wages, and no health (or any other) benifits.

      And corporations bitch about how employees are not loyal anymore.

    25. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by m.ducharme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the Pinto incident with the exploding gas tanks turned on the fact that they did know that the design would result in a certain number of deaths, but that it would be cheaper to pay off the resultant law suits than it would be to implement the fix (which involved an $11 part, if memory serves). Of course, the public found out, and damages awards started skyrocketing, thanks to the punitives, so it looks like they mis-calculated, there.

      So yes, I do think American car companies would design and sell a car with known (to them) issues, if it was cheaper to do so than to fix the issues. Certainly Ford has, in the past.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    26. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Ya, because like any other company they too love bad publicity.

      Seriously, do you honestly believe there was malicious activities going on?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    27. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Haha, thanks for the backup. I think you're right, "deathtrap" is letting them off easy...
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    28. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by John+Courtland · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    29. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Foreign companies will put some jobs here, but (and this is a big "but" for slashdot readers), those are almost all assembly-line jobs. Everything from engineering on up is done overseas. For US automotive engineers, this is the apocalypse.

    30. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Mexico's money is not pegged to ours. It is allowed to trade freely. That means that as Mexico gets stronger, the peso will rise relative to the dollar. I AM fine with that. That is free enterprise. China, like India, controls their money. They make certain that it is designed to flow the jobs there. In addition, both China and India have trade barriers designed to block western goods. The west needs to inact slow trade barriers against both until they agree to free their money's up and to drop their barriers. China had a 10 year period and has basically lied about it. They have done NOTHING. India did not promise, so I believe that we should get them to lower these over a couple of year period. But WRT china, it should be simply that our barriers raise over a 2 year period.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    31. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, the majority of their work is on parts that are brought back to here for American cars. FAR more parts are flowing from China to America than the other way around.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    32. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      that was awesome reading, if morbid. Thanks.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    33. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's not 'jacking' the work. Jacking would be if they got into your car with a gun and told you to GTFO.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That explains why a fair number of my graduating ME class went to work for Toyota in the states. They still engineer stuff in Detroit. Industrial Engineers still work in Alabama, TN, Indiana, etc. And those Engineering jobs aren't in China or India. Toyota, Honda, etc are in Japan. VW, BMW, Porsche, etc are in Germany.

      I don't get where ./ers are convinced that India and China are full of brilliant engineers that are going to take all of our jobs. There's an Indian at work that came over from India. If you bring this subject up to him he'll explain to you that all the jobs we 'outsource' are just a step above what we give interns to do. Running electrical lines in ProE, etc.

    35. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      That high quality American car

      I'm sorry, but you lost me right there...

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    36. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Whiteox · · Score: 1, Informative

      BYD has shown they know how to build laptop batteries.

      Is this the same crowd that make exploding ones that catch fire and melt laptops?
      ---
      Just curious....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    37. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by weeerdo · · Score: 0

      The first video you've posted is of a Volkswagen double cab vanagon truck. Definitely sold in Europe.

    38. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author is not credible. Why did you link that?

    39. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      My car is a good ol' American car (kinda). 2000 Pontiac Firebird TransAm WS/6, a product of General Motors. It was assembled in Canada. :)
      The engine is an LS1. The engine block is cast in Ontario, Canada.
      I'm pretty sure the body sheet metal and plastics were made in Canada, but I couldn't find a reference for that.
      When I changed my water pump and power steering pump, they both had "Made In Canada" stickers on them.

      So what you're saying is: CANADA TOOK OUR JAEHRBS!!!!!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    40. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by chrb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So far all the chinese cars that have been engineered in china have been terrible.

      They said the same thing when the Japanese started making cars... I have no doubt that Chinese companies could engineer cars to meet US/European safety regulations, but at the moment they mainly sell to their domestic less-regulated market, so they save money by having lower engineering standards. If there's money to be made by building to higher standards and exporting to the rest of the world, then they will do it.

    41. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... no, but they do have 'silent recalls' for these issues, that can kill, that they hope people never find out about.

    42. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I am remiss in not sourcing my previous assertions about foreign car companies not putting many engineer jobs in the US:

      The key difference in how the Big Three and foreign brands support jobs in the U.S. comes outside the factories, according to a 2006 study by the Level Field Institute, a group formed by Big Three retirees in Washington.

      "What's driving the difference in jobs ... is investment in research, design, engineering and management," Level Field President Jim Doyle said in a statement on the 2006 study.

      The Center for Automotive Research said the Big Three had 24,000 engineers on U.S. payrolls in 2007. The Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association said its member companies had 3,500 U.S. research and development employees in 2007.

      The rest of that article is full of information pertinent to this discussion as well.

    43. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by aqk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Big difference.

      I am about to buy (well, lease) a Hyundai.

      Sorry, you late lamented GM, Ford, Lada and Yugo!

      Actually I did once buy a GM car!
      About 30 years ago.
      It was called a "Vega"...
      And,oh it burned so brightly! For about 3 years.
      And (I seem to recall) about 30,000 miles, 'til it was hauled to the scrap-yard.
      .
      Never again.
      Die, motherfuckers.
      -
      .

    44. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anti-American bandwagon is full of arrogant stuff.

      It's f*&king history. Goods from China are cheap crap. Goods from Japan used to be the same. Historically, the orient appears to have a philosophy that goes something like this:
      "We will make cheapest widget possible in the highest quantity possible. So cheap, no one can compete with price. After the Americans buy lots of them, we will increase the quality."

    45. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      Nah, mine's an 86 Mustang.

      Engine from USA, interior stamped as made in Canada, and a lot of my metric bolts came from Mexico. :)

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    46. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the majority of their work is on parts that are brought back to here for American cars.

      One engine, offered in two vehicles of the three currently-shipping Theta platform vehicles. Most of GM's Chinese production stays in China; the Chinese have been buying Buicks like crazy.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    47. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So far all the chinese cars that have been engineered in china have been terrible.

      They said the same thing when the Japanese started making cars... I have no doubt that Chinese companies could engineer cars to meet US/European safety regulations, but at the moment they mainly sell to their domestic less-regulated market, so they save money by having lower engineering standards. If there's money to be made by building to higher standards and exporting to the rest of the world, then they will do it.

      Oh of course. I would never say that a people COULDN'T do it, just that so far they've very much not been making good cars, so new ones should always be looked at with a critical eye. I was mostly correcting the guy who called people arrogant for assuming they'll be crap, when actually it's a pretty reasonable assumption.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    48. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Is it more or less credible than "some shit I heard once"?

    49. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Narrator: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

      Woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?
      Narrator: You wouldn't believe.

      Woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?
      Narrator: A major one.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    50. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      So, could you explain how an economy can endlessly drain its currency by doing this to support a low exchange rate, without compensating elsewhere?

      And if, in fact it is possible without negative consequences, why the target economy does not respond likewise?

      I just remember all the crap that was thrown at Japanese support of the cheap yen, great way to grow the economy guys.

    51. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      ... and then easily surpass them.

      Isn't that the bit you are really afraid of?

    52. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by damburger · · Score: 1

      I love the third one with the airbag...

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    53. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      People are not very arrogant about american cars in the US. The only ones buying US cars consistently are Ford Mustang fans who refuse to drive anything else.

    54. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Some parts are made in countries other than China,
      but you are right about it barely being made in the US,
      and the arrogance is "off the hook" here.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    55. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my earliest memories is from the early 1980s. One of my dad's friends drove in the driveway, having just bought a brand new, high end Cadillac. As he proudly sat in it, he brought the driver's side power window down. Instead of down, the whole pane of glass just popped out and fell on the floor! Confused, he tried the passenger side. Same freakin' thing.

      He returned it after that, under a lemon law and bought himself a gray market diesel Mercedes at the time.

    56. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and Courtland are either fuck buddies or the same person. Troll, both of you/version of you.

    57. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still haven't figured out how to make a decent DAP though!

    58. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by ptudor · · Score: 1

      They're also made in Princeton, Indiana.

    59. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by theaveng · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even the "good" Japanese companies have problems.

      About 5 years ago Toyota built an engine that died after only 30,000 miles due to overheating turning the oil to sludge. Initially Toyota blamed their customers but after the U.S. Consumer Protection Agency threatened to file a lawsuit, Toyota had a sudden change of heart and decided to honor the engine warranty.

      Honda had a problem with their early-model Insight having dead batteries. Again, Honda refused to fix the problem and blame the customer, but now Honda has reversed that decision.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    60. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      yep, looks like a vw transporter version t3, but without side mirrors.
      this version is from 1985, though. there were different safety standards back then.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    61. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      It looks like a volkswagen, therefore it must be a Volkswagen. Because, as we all know, there isn't any chance that the Chinese would make a knockoff that looks like a competitor's product, right?

    62. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      there were different safety standards back then.

      Different safety standards? This vehicle obviously met zero safety standards, so it is irrelevant. At 40MPH, a head on collision compressed the front TWO rows of passenger seating all into about 1 foot of space (if that).

    63. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Oh boy do I love diesel. I can't wait until it's common and accepted here in the US. Oh, and until they stop raping on the fuel costs, too. That'd be nice.

    64. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The target economy is responding likewise.

    65. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...yeah, and a company like them never did anything like take an entire
      factory and sell it to some 3rd world country so that they could make
      their own knockoffs...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    66. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      this video explains the problem:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uykStESm3vw

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    67. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engine is an LS1. The engine block is cast in Ontario, Canada.

      Is that so? I thought all V8s were cast in Tonawanda, NY.

    68. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Part of the "problem" with the big 3 getting beat up is the number of assembly line jobs that are threatened, not the number of wonderful engineering jobs.

      In places like Michigan and upstate NY, the majority of the jobs are still blue collar.

    69. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust Tesla's first car either, although charging $100K each may give Tesla an advantage in that it can afford to do more over-engineering and cherry-pick good parts than BYD can at its price segment.

      A Tesla is basically a Lotus with batteries & an electric motor. Of course, I don't know that I'd trust a British car company either, but Lotus have been doing this for some time.

    70. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah, movie quotes!

    71. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by bobvious · · Score: 1

      My mechanical engineering prof said that what doomed Ford was the response of the Ford CEO (it's been a long time since the class, I think it was the CEO) to an internal missive concerning the problem. When he was informed that a certain percentage of riders would die by a fire explosion when the car was rear-ended, he sent the note back after he scrawled on it "let them burn".

    72. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      How this guys post can be a troll is beyond me...

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    73. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      Early 80s diesel cars were pretty nasty. My dad used to have a 1978 Opel Rekord, and its engine was loud and dirty.

    74. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually from serbia where Yugos are made (were made, that is... they stopped a few months ago) and trust me, there was no one here trying to make them good in the first place... The factory was 'self governed' by the workers (a great communist economic idea) and the only thing they were trying to do is work as little as possible. And there was no market to compete on... They came from a country in which you could not get fired from your job and you got your home for FREE (if you were a good party member - otherwise... not so good)... Yugos were an order of magnitude cheaper than anything else you could buy, and there were spare parts on every corner... That was a completely different world.

      The point about being new to the market is good, but there are a lot of companies making decent cars, and it's not like the chinese are shy of 'borrowing' ideas.

      Though I must agree, they don't seem to be doing this well... yet.

    75. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, we're all bailing out Chevy and Ford so that they can continue to produce high quality vehicles at low-low prices.

    76. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Spelling Nazi alert! Just FYI, the word is pronounced 'gunnels', but it's spelled "gunwales". It's a bit of Navy terminology, and I think the spelling was inherited from the British Navy way back when. Sorry for the rant!

    77. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I think that's a legitimate questions.

      How is "I heard Ford could have fixed the pinto and didn't" more credible than anything he could have linked to?

    78. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      No, that was Sony.

    79. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Yugo defence, at least Hyundai didnt have their main factory victim of "humanitarian bombing".

    80. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I found a half dozen references to Canada, and none to the U.S.. They could have been wrong though. I was looking more specifically for the 2000 model year, since that's what I was referencing.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    81. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Wow. I don't think I've ever been modded a troll. It must have been the riceburner fanboys.

          Ok, so now I'll have a flamebait mod now too. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    82. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      You're a simplton and you should hang yourself immediately.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    83. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this then? You don't like being outed for having multiple accounts? Hell, I've half a mind to call out both of you as side accounts of the Twitter troll.

    84. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I'm going to violate every law of Slashdot logic here and keep right on feeding the troll. Thankfully I don't actually have to think of anything to say, simply looking at an attention whore is good enough.

    85. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I do.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    86. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by lavardo · · Score: 1

      which is what they are doing to jobs in the USA...

    87. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      But but slashdot told me 'Information wants to be free and there's no such thing as intellectual property!' If the Chinese want to copy stuff and sell it cheaper and drive the people who invented it out of business surely that just shows that US industry has an obsolete business model, like buggy whip manufacturers or the RIAA/MPAA?

      After all the Chinese aren't stealing anything - the American company didn't lose any property. It's just the same as if I copy a file over bittorrent. Everyone knows that isn't theft or piracy (unless I do it on a boat, lol), just copyright infringement. No one lost anything physical so it can't be theft. And the copyright laws have been written by the RIAA anyway to give them a perpetual monopoly. Hell, if I were Chinese I'd say IP laws give American companies a perpetual monopoly, so I'm justified in ignoring them.

      So you shouldn't say its jacking or theft. Maybe it's against US IP law but we all know those are bogus.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    88. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, they have years to go before they are capable of building automobiles that can compete on safety, comfort and reliability against existing auto makers.

      i think that BYD is fully aware of this and fully expects this car to suck. the next one will suck slightly less. then the next one a little less. 10 years, 20 years from now, BYD may or may not be making a quality car that i would want to buy - but i can almost guarantee you that china will be making a car that i will want to buy. BYD (and china) is in this for the long-haul.

    89. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      This guy is an idiot. Let's pretend we're the same person posting under different aliases on Slashdot. Who in their right mind gives a shit? No one that matters, that's who.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    90. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Describe to me 1) what that will do and 2) who will care.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    91. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by cm2500 · · Score: 1

      How this guys post can be a troll is beyond me...

      Well, the definition of troll on slashdot isn't quite the same as elsewhere on the internet:

      Troll -- A Troll is similar to Flamebait, but slightly more refined. This is a prank comment intended to provoke indignant (or just confused) responses. A Troll might mix up vital facts or otherwise distort reality, to make other readers react with helpful "corrections." Trolling is the online equivalent of intentionally dialing wrong numbers just to waste other people's time.

      Perhaps someone was so nationalistic that they felt Canadian manufacturing does not count as "American"?

      --
      Terms
    92. Re:Your "American" car is full of Chinese stuff by taweili · · Score: 1

      They don't need to design the whole cars. Most of cars today are designed on the shared platforms designed and developed by the suppliers to the automobile brands. BYD just have to build good enough batteries and cores engines and the automobile supply chain is ready to be tapped for the rest.

  15. I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 0, Troll

    Water-Powered Car Incredible invention by Stanley Meyer (R.I.P.)
    Water-Powered Car 2 Another one, just unveiled in 2008 by Japanese company Genepax.
    Water-Powered Car 3 Denny Klein's car goes 100 miles on four ounces of water.
    Water-Powered Car 4 Daniel Dingel runs his car on water, too.
    Water-Powered Car 5 Yet another website on the subject.

    1. Re:I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You mean a metal hydride powered car..

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What I never get is if it as in the first case just use hydrogen how would electrolysing the water and then combusting the hydrogen into water again get more energy than what was required for initial electrolysis? Why not just run on the batteries from the beginning?

      In the case of mixing hydrogen with gasoline I have no idea if it may make combusting more efficient so I won't write it off as impossible but I still doubt it until I see it happening.

    3. Re:I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Regarding video three, four ounces of water and how much electricity and/or gasoline?

      I can run a car 700 km on one grain of salt if it's ok that I just drop it into the filled gasoline tank ...

    4. Re:I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The benefit of hydrogen is the longer range (compress a load into a cylinder) and faster refill time.

      I don't know how a hydrogen fuel cell's efficiency compares to a battery.

      Captcha

    5. Re:I'm getting a WATER powered car ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Wtf are you talking about? There is no fucking refill time if you make the hydrogen thru electrolysis, and there is no hydrogen fuel cell either since they will combust the hydrogen with the gasoline.

      I hate all the lame gay water powered videos and sites on youtube and the Internet and all the retarded morons claiming that omg this is the shit the oil industry hides this from us and kill everyone! They should all be shot for being retarded.

  16. You're by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...retarded. Nothing is made in the US anymore dipshit.

    1. Re:You're by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      My '05 Civic was!

  17. I hope for a technology race by religious+freak · · Score: 0

    Being very optimistic, I hope moves like this on the part of the Chinese will ultimately lead to a "Technology Race" between the West & India on one side and China on the other - similar to the Space Race of yesteryear. The race will involve space, but likely be much broader and include robotics and AI advances.

    Or maybe we'll get caught in a major bout of cock waving with one another and just kill each other off.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  18. Re:Obligs by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    You forgot to include a car analogy.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  19. I have to wonder by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

    If foreign auto makers are constantly fighting with their government over stricter standards or if they strive to get a leg up on the competition. I just think it seems to be an odd contrast to our big 3 who have lawsuits by the dozen to prevent states from setting stricter emission guidelines. If they would embrace what the people are asking for, perhaps they would actually be more competitive in the business. Do foreign auto makers do business the same way? I am genuinely curious.

    1. Re: I have to wonder by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone seems to forget or willfully ignore that Toyota also filed similar lawsuits against states trying to impose stricter emission guidelines.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re: I have to wonder by cdrguru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Part of the problem is that it would be rather expensive to engineer a car to meet 50 different emission standards. Nobody, except the state's showing their control, wants that.

      So why not make it meet the strictest standards? Partly because it just keeps pushing the costs higher for stuff nobody needs in the other 49 states. There is also nothing that suggests there would be one "strictest" standard.

      California was allowed to set requirements that no other state had for quite a while. In the beginning it required reworking and adjusting a car that was imported into California before it could be sold there. So you would see cars selling for $3,000 to $5,000 higher in California. Should you be so silly as to buy a car in Arizona when you were a California resident you would be faced with paying that extra amount to have the car modified before it could be licensed. So in a way, we have tried this already and it was a disaster. It might have helped out air quality in California or it might not have. Nobody really knows.

      I'd say the biggest problem would be conflicting requirements between states. If this was allowed, and so far the Federal Government hasn't made it clear that such state level regulation would never be allowed, you would have a different set of hardware for each state for each car. Sure, California could have their regulations but there would be nothing to prevent Nevada from having different and mutually exclusive requirements.

      The only sensible way is to have one Federal standard. It works for car owners, it works for car manufacturers and it can work for everyone else as well. The problem seems to be enacting some realistic legislation at the Federal level.

      Also, it isn't going to help if some states are allowed to regulate batteries for electric and hybrid cars. Not long ago California prevented sales of cars with lots and lots of lead-acid batteries in them because of the hazards of both lead and acid. I do not know what the state of things are today, but there are plenty of people doing electric car conversions using lead-acid batteries. I suspect it is not legal to buy, sell, modify or license such a car today in California. There is no reason to think that other states will be any more forgiving about toxic pollutants if each state is allowed to pass their own regulations.

    3. Re: I have to wonder by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      The automakers are already in this situation with California, are they not? The measuring stick as to whether federal legislation is working is as easy as looking out your window and checking the smog for the day.

      It seems to me (and I may be vastly over simplifying the issue) that the automaker should simply aim for the highest standard, or better yet, aim beyond it.

    4. Re: I have to wonder by fgouget · · Score: 1

      So why not make it meet the strictest standards? Partly because it just keeps pushing the costs higher for stuff nobody needs in the other 49 states.

      This assumes that, if not required by law, nobody needs or benefits from safer, less polluting vehicles.

  20. ah but you forget.. by julienthjamminjabber · · Score: 1

    In Korea, only old people rehash old slashdot memes.

  21. Gravity powered car by IsMyNameTaken · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you have to do is make the back wheels bigger than the front and you are always going down hill. This should improve mileage by quite a bit but be careful, if the size ratio gets too big it is almost impossible to stop.

    --
    while(1){sig.get()}
    1. Re:Gravity powered car by Janeshat · · Score: 1

      IsMyNameTaken wrote: "All you have to do is make the back wheels bigger than the front and you are always going down hill. This should improve mileage by quite a bit but be careful, if the size ratio gets too big it is almost impossible to stop."

      let me guess, in your city, roads go downhill both ways?

      Granted, in my city we have 12 feet of snow year round and the roads go uphill both ways, so I drive a hummer and hope global warming warms up my city! :)

  22. It'll look acceptable in the show room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but it will only take a full charge about 10 times, then the capacity will rapidly decline to about 10% and occasionally the battery will appear fully charged but then have no energy at all.

  23. Warning by diablovision · · Score: 2, Funny

    I drove one of these but two hours later I felt hungry again and had to drive it some more.

    --
    120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
  24. GM not able to get a plug-in electric earlier? by blind+biker · · Score: 0

    WOW!?!

    With all the sh*t that's been going on with them, and the money they are begging for, GM is not able to get an electric car to market earlier than late 2010? Well, this begs two questions:

    1. What the fuck was GM's CEO doing all this time? I mean, what justified his salary and bonuses, much higher than the ones of the Toyota boss (and I don't see Toyota begging the Japanese govt. for a bailout)? Maybe he was working, or maybe he was spending the whole day sucking his wife's clit. I think the result would have been the same, regardless.

    2. Wouldn't bailing out such a dinosaur be counter-productive in the ong term? A smaller GM would certainly be more able to turn out new designs. AND, more importantly, you don't teach people that if you fuck up, there's a magic fairy that will save you. One thing I have learned in life is, people are motivated by negative consequences. Remove the consequences, and you get indifference and inertia.

    Bailing out GM would reward indifference and gross incompetence. I hope the Obama administration doesn't do it. But Bush might.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:GM not able to get a plug-in electric earlier? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      1) They are testing the battery, tuning software, preparing production lines for mass production (i.e. hundreds of thousands of cars, not 100 or 10000). It's not a fast process.

      2) Smaller company won't have much capacity for large-scale projects.

    2. Re:GM not able to get a plug-in electric earlier? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Actually, both of yours are valid points.

      However, 1. wasn't really the answer to my question.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  25. What Does It Look Like? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I RTFA, no images, uhmmmmm, I see. I hope that BYD can make the car to California specifications so that a down trodden masses like myself could buy one, AND drive it to work. This combined with a Solar Cell Roof could save me some large coin.

  26. If you RTFA by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

    you'll see that it's the first hybrid to be produced in the PRC.

  27. Okay by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    I'm Bosch and I make, among other things, spark plugs, master cylinders, alternators, etc and that should qualify me to make a complete car. BR>
    Bosch is probably not the best example and they probably could make a better car, but you get the idea.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an idea... maybe some of the electric train manufacturers should have a go? (e.g. Brush)

  28. good luck getting support by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful



    A big challenge to any new player getting into the electro-auto market is dealer support. Where is someone supposed to get parts for this thing or a Tesla? Sure, an electric vehicle design should require less maintenance, but even components will need to be replaced due to accidents and road wear.

    I've heard people say the auto bailout money should go to a start-up like Tesla. The problem with completely abandoning the American automakers and putting public funds behind a startup is that the big three already have huge infrastructure in place. They already understand production. Bless the hearts of those Tesla idealists, but they're going to spend a BUNCH of money developing dealerships, parts distribution, training mechanics & sales people. And until their production numbers get big, the deals they'll cut with suppliers won't be as profitable as the ones Ford/GM/Chrysler make with their suppliers thanks to the economies of scale they're working in.

    I'm not saying there isn't a place for smaller companies to come in and fill a niche demand. But now isn't the time to abandon the American auto companies and watch them perish. If that happens, Toyota, Honda, and Hyundai will assist in a huge transfer of wealth overseas.

    Seth

    1. Re:good luck getting support by haruchai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's so hard about supporting an electric car?
      Changing wires? Replacing batteries? How about we make the Big Three assist the nimbler domestic startups.
      They've shown that their size has been a liability when it comes to change.
      If they want public funds, they should be serving the best interests of the public - and, increasingly that means GOING green, not play-acting green.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:good luck getting support by AgentPaper · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's so hard about supporting an electric car?

      Quite a bit, if you think about it:

      1) Educating and qualifying mechanics to work on the car. Your average Joe at the gas station isn't going to be able to service this thing right off the bat, nor will he be able to open the hood and figure it out after a few minutes' inspection. At least for the first two or three years this car is on the market, you'll be forced to rely on dealer service, simply because there won't be trained mechanics anywhere else. And if you break down someplace where there isn't a dealer handy, you're hosed. A hobbyist owner might be able to repair the car, to a greater or lesser extent, but those repairs might void the warranty, or in some states may disqualify the car from street service entirely.

      2) Availability of parts. There is lots and lots more that goes into an electric car, or indeed any car, besides a few hundred feet of wire, an electric motor and a few batteries. If your alternator dies, if you have to replace a transmission or some other drivetrain component, if your windshield cracks, all of those require many more parts to complete beyond the obvious part that's malfunctioning. The problem is compounded if you have multiple systems damaged at once, as in the context of an accident. You'll have to have some mechanism in place to get those parts from their Chinese manufacturers to a U.S. dealer service department, quickly and efficiently. (This is harder than it sounds; as a personal example, I can confirm that for a certain well-known German luxury manufacturer, a replacement front bumper fascia took three weeks to ship from Stuttgart, where replacing the same part on an American vehicle took two days.)

      On a related note, you also have to worry about the general lack of infrastructure. Right or wrong, as it stands right now the entire transportation infrastructure in the US is set up to deal with internal combustion vehicles. Changing over to an electric infrastructure is going to take time, at least two or three years and probably more like five or seven, during which time the drivers of electric vehicles are going to be at a major disadvantage. You won't be able to charge most places, won't be able to get service most places, might not be able to drive on freeways or other limited access roads (at least here, freeways are restricted to internal combustion vehicles with engines greater than 125 CC displacement, which can't be powered farm equipment, and must be able to maintain a minimum speed of 55 MPH). Those restrictions might be enough to put people off electrics entirely, or at the very least slow their adoption. It'd be a damned shame if that happened, but it's a very real risk. In the meanwhile, everyone who bought these electric cars will be in the lurch, and if the manufacturer folds, the vehicles will be little more than hobby pieces.

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    3. Re:good luck getting support by EotB · · Score: 1

      The 'bailout' money that a lot of people are referring to is a package that was put forward a while back to encourage alternative energy vehicles. The fact that the bigger American auto makers are clamoring for it now as a bailout does not automatically mean that a company that is doing exactly what the money was originally intended to encourage should be shut out.

    4. Re:good luck getting support by DrFalkyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's so hard about supporting an electric car?

      Quite a bit, if you think about it:

      1) Educating and qualifying mechanics to work on the car. Your average Joe at the gas station isn't going to be able to service this thing right off the bat, nor will he be able to open the hood and figure it out after a few minutes' inspection. At least for the first two or three years this car is on the market, you'll be forced to rely on dealer service, simply because there won't be trained mechanics anywhere else. And if you break down someplace where there isn't a dealer handy, you're hosed.

      EVs are primarily going to be used for commuting, so I imagine most people aren't going to be that far from the dealer where they bought the car.

      2) Availability of parts. There is lots and lots more that goes into an electric car, or indeed any car, besides a few hundred feet of wire, an electric motor and a few batteries. If your alternator dies, if you have to replace a transmission or some other drivetrain component, if your windshield cracks, all of those require many more parts to complete beyond the obvious part that's malfunctioning. The problem is compounded if you have multiple systems damaged at once, as in the context of an accident. You'll have to have some mechanism in place to get those parts from their Chinese manufacturers to a U.S. dealer service department, quickly and efficiently. (This is harder than it sounds; as a personal example, I can confirm that for a certain well-known German luxury manufacturer, a replacement front bumper fascia took three weeks to ship from Stuttgart, where replacing the same part on an American vehicle took two days.)

      Yet people still buy Germany luxury cars, despite this problem.

      On a related note, you also have to worry about the general lack of infrastructure. Right or wrong, as it stands right now the entire transportation infrastructure in the US is set up to deal with internal combustion vehicles. Changing over to an electric infrastructure is going to take time, at least two or three years and probably more like five or seven, during which time the drivers of electric vehicles are going to be at a major disadvantage. You won't be able to charge most places, won't be able to get service most places, might not be able to drive on freeways or other limited access roads (at least here, freeways are restricted to internal combustion vehicles with engines greater than 125 CC displacement, which can't be powered farm equipment, and must be able to maintain a minimum speed of 55 MPH). Those restrictions might be enough to put people off electrics entirely, or at the very least slow their adoption. It'd be a damned shame if that happened, but it's a very real risk. In the meanwhile, everyone who bought these electric cars will be in the lurch, and if the manufacturer folds, the vehicles will be little more than hobby pieces.

      Like I said before, people are using their cars 99% for commuting, most likely with 50 miles from their home, round trip. You recharge at home at night. No need to build charging stations or anything like that. Even if they were - the infrastructure is already there. Every where you can find a gas station, you can find an electric outlet. But you wouldn't do that, except in an emergency, as the batteries take time to charge.

      Electric power is actually more readily available than gasoline. We have an entire grid devoting to distributing it. Gas has to be shipped to specific gas stations. I don't see an infrastructure problem.

    5. Re:good luck getting support by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Actually dealers are part of the problem of American automobile companies...

      Dealer Surplus

      Carmakers can't just shut down marginal dealers. Under state franchise laws car companies must show good cause to terminate a dealer's franchise agreement. A federal law gives a terminated dealer the right to sue for "bad faith" by the car company. Try telling a jury that putting two dozen workers on the unemployment line was done in good faith.

      These laws aren't going to change. Dealers have traditionally been prominent businessmen with political clout in state legislative chambers. (Ever wonder why you can't buy a car online?)

      Nor can carmakers streamline their networks by moving an outlet wherever they see fit. In Texas and Florida, among other states, dealers have the right to block any new or relocated store within 20 miles. When there's a conflict, it's referred to a state motor vehicles board, a place where relocation deals often go to die.

    6. Re:good luck getting support by ptudor · · Score: 1

      Electric power is actually more readily available than gasoline. We have an entire grid devoting to distributing it. Gas has to be shipped to specific gas stations. I don't see an infrastructure problem.

      Please, don't point out the obvious. Sure, nuclear power from just up the coast is a much more resilient infrastructure than oil from Saudi Arabia or the Gulf of Mexico. And the cost per mile in raw fuel to move my electric scooter is a tenth of the cost of my fast expensive car that was made in Stuttgart, or free if the landlord were to install solar panels. Whatever.

    7. Re:good luck getting support by Inda · · Score: 1

      Sorry but that's a load of rubbish.

      When cars started getting engine management computers everyone said the same thing about stupid mechanics hitting the CPU with a rubber mallet. Fast forward to today - my small garage has diagnostic equipment and they seem to be able to fix most problems.

      Under the hood will have less parts than a combustion engine. No gearbox, no rads, no fuel pipes, air fiters etc. It will have a computer chip and an electric motor. I was winding my own motors and cutting my own brushes at ten years old. Please don't suggest electric motors, even the new brushless ones, are complex.

      Wishbones, UV joints, shocks, brake pads; these will all be the same on an electric car. And I not sure why everyone says you must buy parts from a dealership. All parts come from large warehouses in the UK and next day delivery is not a problem. My small garage can order parts from any car before 12 and they'll arrive before 4pm.

      And finally, minimum speed of 55mph? I've built electic radio controlled cars that go faster than that. There no reason an electric car can't go 80mph. It'll even get there quicker than an IC driven car.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:good luck getting support by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your reply - it's good to hear from someone who knows a thing or two about electric motors - I don't.
      I'm befuddled as to how AgentPaper got modded up for his post while you didn't

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  29. economies by thephydes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that this highlights the difference between an economy based on greed - "It's OK, we can continue to stifle innovation and rake in the profits", to one based on need - "We have the largest population and a fast growing economy (and associated emissions pollution), how do we meet both those challenges AND make a profit on the way?"

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. no Chinese designed car passes US standards yet by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The US "secret trade weapon": safety and emission standards. Its coming: they learn quickly.

  32. The lawsuits go both ways, two years ago... by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    "California's attorney general has sued the six largest U.S. and Japanese automakers for damages related to greenhouse gas emissions.
    The federal lawsuit alleged that emissions from their vehicles have harmed Californians' health, damaged the environment and cost the state millions of dollars to combat their effects. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland, names Chrysler Motors Corp., General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Toyota Motor North America, Honda North America and Nissan North America."

    The same type of "sue, countersue" activity has been seen in Europe.
    Don't know about China, India or Japan though. How safe is it to sue the governement in China nowadays anyway, if you're a Chinese Company?

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:The lawsuits go both ways, two years ago... by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent question as well. Are those companies privately owned, or subsidized by the government? I'm also curious if the foreign automakers counter sued as well, and if they typically do, what did they sue for?

  33. What's wrong with you people? by haruchai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have yet to see a serious, insightful post about this story. A little googling turned up pics and data although I confess that I don't know what
    16 kwh / 100 KM works out to in MPG.

    The pictures I saw of the car look pretty nice. Congrats to the Chinese - if this turns out to be a quality vehicle, it may force the Big Three stragglers to dump some of their guzzlers and give
    us clean, efficient vehicles we can depend on

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:What's wrong with you people? by DanielG42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wikipedia quotes 1 gallon of gasoline at 33.7kwh.

      That puts this car at about 124 mpg.

      --
      Daniel
    2. Re:What's wrong with you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16 kwh battery. Just like the GM Volt. If they have use only 50% of it's capacity for lifespan reasons, and it get 5 miles / kwh like many of the efficient EVs (tesla roadster & GM Volt), it will have a 40 mile plug in range.

      BYD has been working on BEVs longer than GM on its Volt (beginning of 2007) for quite some time. GM doesn't expect to have a truly mass market (affordable) Volt until ~2015. I wonder if BYD will be up to GM quality levels by then?

      If I were GM, I'd be worried about Aptera (if they get some serious money), not BYD.

    3. Re:What's wrong with you people? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Does it kill you in a 40mph crash like the rest of the Chinese made cars do?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:What's wrong with you people? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer that then having a car weigh twice as much as it needs to just because the US car manufacturers have lobbied for backup redundant secondary top-impact airbags in order create a barrier to entry in the US market for competitors.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    5. Re:What's wrong with you people? by laci · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see a serious, insightful post about this story. A little googling turned up pics and data although I confess that I don't know what 16 kwh / 100 KM works out to in MPG.

      If 1 kWh costs $0.2 then it costs you $3.20 to drive roughly 60 miles. A moderately efficient combustion engine car woud use 2 gallons of gas which costs $3.3 at current average prices. However, you can use cheaper electricity since you'd recharge during the night. A lot depends on how much maintenance this car will need.

      --Laci

    6. Re:What's wrong with you people? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You do realize that even when the Japanese cars came to North America in the 70's they could survive a 40mph crash and wouldn't kill you. Just remember it wasn't the US that lobbied for redundant airbags, it was the europeans.

      Have a nice day with that.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:What's wrong with you people? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      With any "Chinese" topic, comments on human rights, environment, quality...etc. will automatically get a +5 insightful.

  34. 2009? hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA says
    "AHN Staff

    Shenzhen, China (AHN) - China's BYD Co., which is 10 percent owned by U.S. investor Warren Buffett, said Monday that it has launched the world's first homegrown electric, mass-pr...

    BYD chairman Wang Chuan Fu told reporters on Monday that the company will sell the vehicle in European and U.S. markets in 2011, which is a delay from its previous decision to launch in the regions by 2010.

  35. Why the hostility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is going on in this thread? Have all U.S. Slashdotters gone crazy? This _is_ good news after all.

    As non-U.S. citizen, please explain this general hostility to me.

    1. Re:Why the hostility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a human being, you should already be aware of China's human rights abuses, environmental destruction, poor manufacturing standards (incl. tainted food), etc.

      There's understandably quite a lot of ill-will towards the people who have been running China, and a large dose of skepticism about any Chinese products.

    2. Re:Why the hostility? by robertl234 · · Score: 1

      All china-related posts are like this. Some people don't like the idea that their country is in decline while another is rising. Some people also don't remember their own history very well.

    3. Re:Why the hostility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I understand that, but there just seems to be more.

      Has the demonization of China alread started in the U.S.? I mean, it just seems that you guys always need someone to hate, and as Saddam is dead...

    4. Re:Why the hostility? by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I think all the news about unsafe pet food and the local Chinese having unsafe food to eat. Makes many Americans think that Chinese Government oversight is even worse in China than it is in the USA. Tim S

    5. Re:Why the hostility? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the promised land for all the free market prophets ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  36. Chevy Volt vs. BYD Vent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder who wins that battle.

  37. Re:ONE STAR safety rating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....So far all the chinese cars that have been engineered in china have been terrible. I remember one example that looked like any other common car in the US or elsewhere, but it did so poorly in crash testing it couldn't even manage ONE STAR.

    Bah, you call it ONE STAR safety rating. China merely calls this birth control.

  38. People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When the first Japanese cars showed up in Europe in the 1970s, they were cheap but had a terrible reputation. That has changed. Today they are on the same quality level (and almost as expensive) as European cars. Toyota even ruled the reliability/breakdown statistics for years, only recently some European models have retaken the lead.

    I expect that the same will happen with the Chinese cars. They may have not much experience in car making now, but 10 years from now things can look different.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That won't happen, and this is why. Japan was forced to build robots to keep costs down. In manufacturing, there are three kind of builders: The expert craftsman who is probably well paid to do excellent work, the robot who can drill a hole in precisely the same place 10,000 times, and the poorly paid factory worker, for whom really, really good quality control is needed. Guess which one China employs? It is a fact that a part assembled by machine will, given the same effort put into QC, put out a much better product than the same part assembled by low wage humans. low quality parts=poor system reliability.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or there's the fourth, American kind: the highly paid, unskilled factory worker.

    3. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by jcasman · · Score: 1

      There's not a lot to suggest that China will follow the same path as Japan. They have tried, consciously, in limited ways, to emulate the so-called Japanese miracle. But they have a monster coastal market and a pre-industrial in-land one, they have large minority populations and adversarial labor relations, they have heavier industrial demands for military production than the Japanese who adhered to American hegemony... these and many, many other factors make comparing China's path to Japan's overly facile.

    4. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      You are probably trying to be funny, but they are certainly not unskilled. Moreover, any lack of training they may have would certainly be the fault of the employer.

    5. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by damburger · · Score: 1

      Why can't their military development (which these days, is about changing from quantity to quality) feed into their civilian development? They won't follow the Japanese path precisely, but it doesn't mean they won't develop.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    6. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      You're saying that it won't happen - that in 10 years things will look different. So Chinese won't improve in quality, or use robots down the road? What did people say about Chinese electronics 5-10 years ago? I don't follow your logic: because they suck at building cars now, it's not going to change in the future.

    7. Re:People laughed about Japanese cars, too. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What degrees or chartered qualifications do you need to get a job as a factory line worker?

  39. Putting the industrial complex before the horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been told that they've only sold 150+ electric cars in Europe, where the population is always ready to jump on the latest fad.

    Where do you suppose the other 19,800 of these cars will be sold? OH! China is Communist: they'll sell'em at gunpoint. Nevermind. :>

  40. Re: Europe by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Here it is more of a lobby game. As a European I'm not aware of any large lawsuits of that kind going on, but the car makers certainly try to create political pressure against stricter emission standards. And they tend to be successful in influencing their governments, who then try to change EU policy in the sense of "their" companies.
    In particular, German car makers who have a of large models in their fleet try to kill the planned emission limit of 120g CO2/km.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  41. Tesla is a niche product by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    You're right. I'd love a Tesla, but spending over $100K on a small 2-seater with limited range and no gas backup is not an option for me. Nor is it for most people. It's basically a semi hand-built car with all of the non-electric/electronic engineering done by Lotus. (It's 90% an Elise).

    So yeah, they don't know shit about car engineering, let alone volume production.

    Still want want though...

    As for the Chinese car, good luck with the crash test.

    1. Re:Tesla is a niche product by ptudor · · Score: 1

      Would you spend $25k+ on a 2 seater with the option for a gas backup? Get an Aptera.

    2. Re:Tesla is a niche product by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link - looks sweet.
      Good to see that they put the two wheels at the right end for a trike - at the front.

      On the 'reservation' page, there's no mention of price, though. Just a 500$ deposit.

  42. yeah by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    one thing they do that is ecologically harmful is that they make ELECTRIC CARS

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yeah by networkBoy · · Score: 0, Troll

      +1 unknowingly insightful.

      Total environmental damage from my oil (fuel) burning Benz? relatively low.
      Vs. Prius? I win.
      Assuming I repair the car when it needs it (which I do), rather than tossing it out and buying the prius to replace it, I will have saved gobs of energy as follows:
      smelting bauxite to aluminum (high energy cost)
      mining Nickel (high environmental cost)
      shipping raw nickel to china for sintering and foaming into battery electrodes (high fuel cost)
      performing said sintering and foaming (high energy and environmental cost)

      The list simply goes on and on.
      I can do so much more for the environment by simply keeping my 25 year old car and repairing it as needed (heck get two, they're cheap... now) than if I went out and bought the latest "eco car". As an added bonus I get to ride in something that's nice, comfortable, solid, that I can repair (sometimes with help), and that uses much less fuel than people think.

      The Prius is supposed to be good in stop and go because when you're stuck there you're not burning fuel right? I can idle my car for 8 hours on only a sip more than 2 gallons of diesel.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:yeah by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      best example of -1 troll != disagree ever!

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:yeah by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      one thing they do that is ecologically harmful is that they make ELECTRIC CARS

      Actually, that's an interesting question. We all know that manufacturing process itself, depending on how it's done, can be a lot more polluting than the car itself, electric or not. Now, we have environmental protection regulations in the First World to avoid this, but in China, with all the cost cutting?..

    4. Re:yeah by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      This deserves insightful, not troll.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    5. Re:yeah by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      What is the motivation? They are making electric cars because no one is in that market in a big way yet. Not because they believe in environmental responsibility.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  43. For once, a rational argument for the support. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Well, they're the target of lifestyle environmentalists, unionbusters, as well as government-backed transplants.

    If that happens, Toyota, Honda, and Hyundai will assist in a huge transfer of wealth overseas.

    Never mind that it'll be the last you'll ever see of affordable performance. Cheaply built compacts or overpriced exotics will be the rule of the day should they fail.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  44. Re:That elusive simple math by Superpiduh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A kWh is a measure of energy, and a gallon (US) of regular gasoline (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrol#Density) contains about 9.67 kWh of energy. 15 kWh is roughly 1.55 US gallons. 100 km is roughly 62.1 miles.
    The mileage 15 kWh / 100 km is equivalent to about 64.5 miles per US gallon.
    I hope I got that right.

  45. They already have bailouts. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    and I don't see Toyota begging the Japanese govt. for a bailout

    They already are being bailed out by our government and the Japanese government.

    Bailing out GM would keep the middle option of affordable performance. Of course, you'd think that was an I-4 over a straight-six/v-8 for well under $20000(6cyl) or $30000(8cyl).

    Crank out less environmentalist cars.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  46. Environmentalists, please leave the design studio. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    GM killed electric trolley public transportation on the East Coast decades ago, pushing for city buses made by GMC that used internal combustion.

    Come to somewhere deep in the Rust Belt - and see trolleys.

    Then wonder why they've kept them and Ohio being in lockstep with Michigan in supporting bailouts.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  47. I must be reading too much slashdot by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    At the first sight of the title I thought it was something about GNU Automake and car analogies on Slashdot.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  48. Reminds me of another story.... by neorush · · Score: 1

    Anyone here ever owned a Harley-Davidson that was built by a bowling company? Lets see how a company who manufacturers cell phone parts does....I'm not saying it won't work....but for 22K I'll wait a year and get the Toyota.

    --
    neorush
  49. I wish I could back up GM... by JonDorian88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking from a point of view that can see the GM world headquarters from my apartment, I'd like to think that GM has learned its lesson; I desperately do. What with the automakers shitting themselves and the local corruption of government, I'm finding it harder and harder to honestly say that I love Detroit. I don't know what American car companies can do about it anymore. With the toxic UAW and the bureaucrats blaming each other for the downfalls of their industry they are totally ignoring the fact that there are other countries vying for number one. It's shameful and it's ridiculous that we spend all our time pointing fingers instead of getting shit done. Now people are vandalizing foreign cars more then ever, keying things like "buy American" on to hoods and doors of Hondas and Toyotas. Oddly enough I take a walk though GM's showroom to find that one of their models are made of 15% American parts; the rest is made in Mexico. It has become blatantly obvious that cheap people power fuel this industry and we as American are nowhere near that willing to work for so little. I don't blame companies for outsourcing, that's capitalism and it's been our mantra for a long time. If we're finally seeing that we're digging our own graves here, we've noticed it a little too late. I just hope India and China would learn from our mistake. I think the first electric car is a decent start. And just for the hell of it: I, for one, welcome our new mandarin speaking overlords (that one was a little too close to home to be funny, wasn't it?)

    --
    The 14'th amendment was was created to be an option.
  50. Trolley Mythology by westlake · · Score: 1
    GM killed electric trolley public transportation on the East Coast decades ago, pushing for city buses made by GMC that used internal combustion.

    Trolley lines were steep decline before World War One.

    It cost about a penny a mile to transport a family of four in a Ford. There would be room for a dog and a week's worth of groceries.

    The trolley fare would be 5 cents each plus transfers. Your dry goods parcels shipped by Downtown Merchants Delivery and the dog stayed home.

    The trolley line had tracks and overheads to maintain. The big city line could employ 7,000 people and still not consistently show a profit with wages of 21 cents an hour. $2.50 a day when Ford was paying workers on the line $5 a day.

    The open cars of the rural lines were a joy in mid-summer. Navigating the streets of the Garment District to board a car in mid-winter not so much.

    Especially, perhaps, for a woman.

  51. Mfg. quality? by peektwice · · Score: 1

    So if you buy one of these, given Chinese manufacturing quality, and you get electrocuted, which of your family members does the Chinese government bill for the burial?

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  52. Cynical from too many of these claims, I guess. by Jaywalk · · Score: 1

    What's wrong? Mostly that every week or so someone comes up with another article claiming cold fusion or gas made from dirty sweat socks or some such. The article seemed a bit thin to me so I did some googling and found an Edmunds article claiming the car would be out next year. But that article came out last year. See any cars around yet? Then I cam across this one that says the car won't be available around here until 2011. And then there's a Bloomberg article that claims that, "The government may subsidize hybrid cars to cut costs for consumers." So is the $22k price tag with or without the subsidy?

    For comparison purposes, I've been following the saga of the Chevy Volt and I think the BYD offering falls into the too-good-to-be-true category. The best guess seems to be the Volt will cost around $35k to $40k, mostly because of the expensive lithium-ion batteries, and the all-electric range is about 40 miles. But the BYD says they're using the same batteries and selling around $22k with a 62 mile all-electric range. And while the Chinese model is allegedly "here" you and I won't get to see or touch one until at least 2011. Until I see better specs or more detailed plans I can't get excited about this.

    Mind you, I think plug-in hybrids are the way to go, but cars like the Volt and Tesla never recover the extra cost of the vehicle in fuel savings. I suspect the answer is to ditch the fancy batteries and stick with cheap lead-acid packs and a limited all-electric range of about 20 miles for a basic two adult and two kid car. It still means that half the forty mile range will be all electric. The last piece of the puzzle will fall into place when parking spots (malls, office complexes, parking structures) offer recharging for a fee. How many people drive to work, then park for eight hours? Until then you're in a chicken-and-egg trade off. The rechargers won't be put in until people are buying plug-ins, but not many will buy plug-ins without the rechargers.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  53. Sure about GM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "GM, whose Chevy Volt will be launched in late 2010"

    Shouldn't this be: "in case someone buys the Volt in GM's bankruptcy sale, the product then formerly known as Volt may be launched in late 2010..."

  54. Meanwhile, Zenn in Canada by TigerDawn · · Score: 1

    Has been making electric cars since 2005.

    --
    Internet Retail spaces are wonderful. Get over it!
  55. and the acronym stands for.... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    Nobody has even noticed that the name of the car is 'BYD.' In Asian countries this is translated as 'Bury Your Dead.'

    Seth

  56. Out of Reach for Most Chinese by ITFromHome · · Score: 1

    Even limiting availability to large cities in China, I don't see any demand for electric cars materializing there. Even though they have been marketing towards, "cab operators, government agencies and corporate customers," this cannot sustain such a new venture.
    All the salary information I can find pegs the average salary in Chinese cities and towns at close to USD$5,000. That's Yearly! Sure there is wealth, but the gap is enormous. And you will not convince the Chinese wealthy to drive some introductory electric car over their other expensive, flashy imports. Image is too important.
    Their delay to launch in European and US markets until 2011 seems like a bad decision.

  57. Actual Specs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe its just me. NPR reported this with their usual anti-American smarmy tone, noting it was faster, went farther, charged faster than the Detroit produced Volt. But they forgot to include the actual specs. The story notes that the car will go 62 miles on a charge, but not how fast, how much weight it will carry, what is the acceleration rate, how fast it will recharge, how long the batteries last, how much they cost to replace. This, of course, would be reporting, or journalism. I dont really expect journalism from npr, wired, or the Chinese news bureau, but please folks, ask questions. Or wait.... Think.

  58. Not just wrong but spectacularly wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >...Chinese, this is a country that has had a incredible GDP since the days of the silk road.

    It would be difficult to create a single sentence that displays a more profound lack of comprehension of economics, of history, of politics, -- hell, of basic maths(1) -- than this eruption of stupidity.

    Do you have any freaking concept of what led to the rise of communism in China?

    Can we say 'feudalism plus the painful lack of economic development for the vast majority of the population"?

    See, I knew you could.

    1. Hint: try compounding an 'incredible GDP' over that period of time. Gosh, that's an impossibly large number in a real economy isn't it Mr. Mugabe?

    1. Re:Not just wrong but spectacularly wrong by Brigadier · · Score: 1

      normally I don't acknowledge morons like you with a response, but you are particularly interesting.

      A countryâ(TM)s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of the total flow of goods and services produced over a specified time period. What does that statement have to do with politics ?

      Everyone who has ever taken even the most basic history class knows of the silk road, knows that's why the world was circumnavigated in the first place.... the orient, silk and spices, Marco Polo ??? coming back to you know.

      you my friend are retarded, and in love with hearing yourself speak.

  59. Does not meet US safty standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to all of the published articles, this car doesn't meet US safty standards and the manufacturer isn't even saying that they'll try.

    So guess what, these aren't going to show up in the US or EU.

    Go spend some time on greencarcongress.com and read the hundreds of articles about US and EU manufacturers who are bringing PEV and HPEV cars to market.

    This is not even close to revolutionary.

    1. Re:Does not meet US safty standards by haruchai · · Score: 1

      According to all of the published articles, this car doesn't meet US safty standards and the manufacturer isn't even saying that they'll try.

      So guess what, these aren't going to show up in the US or EU.

      Go spend some time on greencarcongress.com and read the hundreds of articles about US and EU manufacturers who are bringing PEV and HPEV cars to market.

      This is not even close to revolutionary.

      I said nothing about this being revolutionary. I was complimenting the Chinese manufacturer on "gittin' r dun".
      The established manufacturers could and should have had cars like this on the market a decade ago.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  60. Faddy, Faithworthy and Futuramic by damsgaard · · Score: 1

    from byd.com. F3e is a remarkable example of energy-saving, environment-friendly, technology-driven and trendy automotive manufacturing. Inheriting the design concepts of being Faddy, Faithworthy and Futuramic, it has taken the concept of driver-friendly into full consideration It is also equipped with an on-board charger, which is compatible with a standard electric socket (220V 10A). Thanks to BYDâ(TM)s

    outstanding technology integration capacity, F3eâ(TM)s cost has been reduced to the maximum extent, laying the foundation for commercialization of F3e.

    1. Re:Faddy, Faithworthy and Futuramic by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Never mind that they can't even get a 6-cylinder engine in their lineup.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  61. Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for Chinese automobile crash tests on Youtube and this "cheap" plug-in does not look like a deal.

  62. Great, but i'm not entirely convinced. by djveer · · Score: 1

    Battery powered electric cars seem like a great idea for most of the warmer climates, but here in Winnipeg it's -45 F with the windchill. The motor in my electric window struggled to work this morning even after the engine had warmed up.

    What happens when EVERYTHING is powered by electricity?

  63. Re:That elusive simple math by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    Does that include losses in charging? And if not, how much is does charge loss add?

  64. Re:ONE STAR safety rating. by fifedrum · · Score: 1

    a state enforced abortion in the 18th trimester?

  65. Forget the battery technology... by smithmc · · Score: 1

    ...has anyone tested 'em for lead paint yet? Melamine in the gas tanks, maybe? Now we're going to trust them to sell cars to us? Not me, dude.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!