Slashdot Mirror


iTunes Gift Card Key System Cracked, Exploited

moonbender writes "Fake but working iTunes gift cards are being sold on Chinese auction sites for a fraction of their value: 'The owner of the Taobao shop told us frankly that the gift card codes are created using key-generators. He also said that he paid money to use the hackers' service. Half a year ago, when they started the business, the price was around 320 RMB [about $47] for [a] $200 card, then more people went into this business and the price went all the way down to 18 RMB [about $2.60] per card, "but we make more money as the amount of customers is growing rapidly."' The people at Chinese market researcher Outdustry have apparently confirmed this by buying a coupon and transferring it into an iTunes account. Oops."

388 comments

  1. BitTorrent by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's still easier to use BitTorrent.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Not everything on iTunes is on BitTorrent or the like.

    2. Re:BitTorrent by aliquis · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, even more is on bittorrent and the like ...

    3. Re:BitTorrent by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's still easier to use BitTorrent.

      It's probably safer too. Bittorrent is going to be a civil matter. Exploiting a hole in Apple's POS system to get free stuff probably qualifies as fraud and would bring criminal charges.

      Random thought: Reminds me of the old days when you could create credit card "numbers" that weren't actually valid but passed the checksum test and use them to create AOL accounts. Kind of surprised that Apple wouldn't know better.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:BitTorrent by earlymon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's still easier to use BitTorrent.

      I have no clue, access to BitTorrent, behind the Great Firewall of China. But from what I've read (horror stories) about net activities being traced and questioned, I'd use an illegal Apple Store access rather than BitTorrent.

      "Yes, Comrade Prosecutor - tell me what I did wrong ripping off the imperialists," sounds like a better defense than, "I promise I wasn't looking at porn."

      Never reward Behavior A and hope for Behavior B.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    5. Re:BitTorrent by tacarat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Random thought: Reminds me of the old days when you could create credit card "numbers" that weren't actually valid but passed the checksum test and use them to create AOL accounts. Kind of surprised that Apple wouldn't know better.

      But the vendor said it was foolproof!

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    6. Re:BitTorrent by shemp42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ANyone translate for me? I need about 20 of these cards.

    7. Re:BitTorrent by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      AOL caught on eventually. Compuserve never did, that I'm aware of. Free trials aplenty with a valid check digit.

    8. Re:BitTorrent by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And torrents tend to be of much higher quality than iTunes tracks.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    9. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Also, you aren't bankrolling GPL violating code thieves.

    10. Re:BitTorrent by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      In China you'd just buy a DVD, 5 GB of whatever you like (movies, music, porn, warez) for about US$1.

    11. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why did this get modded troll? I'm absolutely right. The anti-Tivoization clauses had to be added to the GPL3 because of companies like Apple who take massive amounts of GPL code to build their empires and give NOTHING in return. Apple has yet to open EVEN ONE LINE of the OS X source and actively works against us running open source code on the iPhone, which runs open source code in the form of Webkit and God only knows what else because it's completely closed and sealed and locked away from us. OPEN YOUR EYES. Apple and friends are holding the head of the open source movement under water, slowly drowning us with our own work. Anyone who gives one penny to Apple is contributing to our direst enemy.

    12. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is ignorant with anything blackhat related. Why do you think Apple users don't use virus scanners or real firewalls?

    13. Re:BitTorrent by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Could you give some numbers please. I have no idea if you're comparing against the old aac bit rate of kbit/s or the newish bit rate of 256kbit/s or if you are a whore for lossless audio (flaac etc...). I assume 254kbit/s is pretty average even for torrents, but I may be wrong.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    14. Re:BitTorrent by omeomi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you think Apple users don't use virus scanners or real firewalls?

      Because, for the most part, nobody is really writing viruses for OSX, so protecting against them is largely a waste of time? Then again, if you don't download shady software on Windows, you're not going to have a problem with viruses, either...

    15. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm anonymous, but I just thought I'd point out, China's been capitalist for more than a decade. In fact, they are more rabid of capitalists than the USA! The communist party is only communist in name now.

    16. Re:BitTorrent by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

      It is generally pretty easy to find any moderately popular music as 320kbps mp3s or in FLAC format. The high quality versions do tend to have less seeders however, presumably because of larger file size.

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
    17. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you would even use the phrase "direst enemy" while discussing code shows how ridiculous and out of proportion this whole argument is.

    18. Re:BitTorrent by bkgood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      companies like Apple who take massive amounts of GPL code to build their empires and give NOTHING in return.

      ... except the huge advances Apple has given KHTML in the form of WebKit.

    19. Re:BitTorrent by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No, even more is on bittorrent and the like ...

      ... and better yet, you don't have to steal anything!

      Using cracked gift cards on iTunes will actually take away money from Apple since they have to pay someone for the imaginary property. So money loss occur, no such thing with bittorrent.

    20. Re:BitTorrent by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Plenty, but the source for those parts is probably there if you ask for them.

    21. Re:BitTorrent by aliquis · · Score: 1

      When it comes to music it won't matter for most of us since we can't hear a difference anyway and also AAC probably sound better at the same bitrate than MP3.

      Maybe he was referring to video to, I have no idea what format Apple delivers that in.

    22. Re:BitTorrent by fbjon · · Score: 1

      But the vendor said it was foolproof!

      Indeed it is. Only fools can't crack it.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    23. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That used to work for pr0n sites too.

    24. Re:BitTorrent by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      No according to MS. Today's patch closes a whole were downloading or going to a website that had a specially created WMF image would allow hackers to launch malicious code simply if the user viewed it on webpage or loaded it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    25. Re:BitTorrent by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Thank god the pharmaceutical companies gave us child-proof bottles. See how it lead to innovations elsewhere?

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    26. Re:BitTorrent by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      WRONG! Ever hear of a Network Worm? Ever hear of "Drive-by Downloads"? Ever hear of viri spreading through "Autorun"?

      Your ignorance is a very big disservice to the world in general.

    27. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody, really. Why would anyone want all those platinum MC numbers? Really? Really. Because Mac users would be much less likely to install malware. Really.

    28. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's all illegal. So "capitalism" in China means you got to pay everyone that saw you buy the DVD for a buck.

    29. Re:BitTorrent by American+Terrorist · · Score: 1

      I and many friends use bittorrent every day in China, no one has any problems. It's slower than it should be but dems da breaks.

    30. Re:BitTorrent by bitrex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It took the Chinese only about 3 decades to become what U.S. government and corporations have been having wet dreams about for nearly a century - that is a largely autocratic and oligarchic corporate system that can count on socialist support from the federal government when it needs it, which is all the time. In the meantime the economists or the People's Worker's Party or whomever will dispense the priestly blessings of the socialist revolution or laissez-faire capitalism or whatever is in vogue at the time to the citizens, leaving the government and corporate entities to pursue the obvious and efficient solution for economic and national power. Capitalism vs. communism with regard to China is a false dichotomy. The US is probably on the way to whatever China is now, it's just taken us a lot longer to get there because we've had to spend an enormous amount of effort at keeping up the illusion of a representative democracy, while China has been autocratic pretty much all along.

    31. Re:BitTorrent by eyendall · · Score: 1

      "But the vendor said it was foolproof!"

      Nothing is foolproof to an intelligent fool.

    32. Re:BitTorrent by shmlco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not even one line??? Golly.

      But if true, then why they have an entire subsite devoted to Open Source, with links to the source for Darwin and the Mach kernel, WebKit, Bonjour, and more???

      http://developer.apple.com/opensource/index.html

      Either you don't know what you're talking about or... you don't know what you're talking about.

      If I were you I'd open my eyes.... (grin)

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    33. Re:BitTorrent by joeme1 · · Score: 1

      I've gotten viruses from my ISP's website. So even with being extra cautious about software you download and run, you can't catch everything.

    34. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, false?
      An unpatched fresh Windows XP connected to the internet via a broadband connection could be remotely owned before you had time to download the updates.

    35. Re:BitTorrent by houghi · · Score: 1

      1) Please write a virus for OSX, Linux, BSD, ... as a proof of concept just to shut people up about how much safer their OS is.
      2) I don't download the shady software, my OS does that all by himself.

      And yes, I understand the difference between a virus and a trojan. If you do the following on your Linux machine and follow orders, you most likely will have a trojan on your system.

      wget http://houghi.org/trojan && sh trojan

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    36. Re:BitTorrent by Rennt · · Score: 1

      The old 'viruses only target popular platforms' meme relies on the assumption that every platform is exactly secure as every other platform, and that is provably false.

      But putting that aside - if we can agree that there is some phenomena at work that results in a strange lack of viruses on platforms other than Microsoft's - then the answer to the grandparent's question is that Mac|Linux|BSD users do not use malware countermeasures because THEY DON'T NEED THEM.

    37. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever hear of viruses spreading through "Autorun"?

      fixed.

    38. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say this occurred to me when I was forced to register an itunes for a relative who had just bought an iPod, and it is MANDATORY (practically ;-) ) to enter credit card details!

        "protected with industry standard encryption" or some such was the claim... Thanks, but I'll keep my credit card number where it's protected by my wallet and "the beast".

    39. Re:BitTorrent by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple has yet to open EVEN ONE LINE of the OS X source

      This turns out not to be the case.

      See here.

      Got any more uninformed bitching to do?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    40. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win2K w/o SP4 or a real firewall will get infected within 4 seconds of getting online (in my experience).

    41. Re:BitTorrent by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...and all the ZeroConf code, the IOKit, LaunchD, all the Firewire library code from Zayante, CoreFoundation, the GCC Objective-C implementation, a lot of additions to SQLite, not to mention all the work they're doing on LLVM (which will finally end the dark ages of GCC).

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    42. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Then again, if you don't download shady software
      > on Windows, you're not going to have a problem
      > with viruses, either...

      Or visit web sites, or look at jpegs, or just have your machine on.

    43. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think BitTorrent is only going to be a civil matter (I assume you mean in the United States), then you should probably have a read over 17 U.S.C. 506.

    44. Re:BitTorrent by portalcake625 · · Score: 1

      Dude, they gave the OSX kernel.

    45. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...alright but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, roads, the freshwater system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    46. Re:BitTorrent by freak1987 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Is anybody out there, woh can tell me , where to buy those cracked iTunes Gift Cards. From my point of view its brilliant and way easier then damn bit torrent, because, you can as well surprise your friends with the newest music or even an episode of your favourit tv show. Thank you in advance

    47. Re:BitTorrent by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      So if, by using itunes, you're bankrolling code thieves, wouldn't that mean that by not using itunes, you're becoming a music thief?

      What? He can't have it both ways! If it's not stealing, then neither is GPL violations!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    48. Re:BitTorrent by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      That depends. With iTunes, I know exactly what I'm getting...middle of the road AAC/MP3 files that are tagged and labeled correctly. With bittorrent I can get anything from "not acceptable" to "higher quality than detectable by human ear" to everything in between. Personally, I'd rather click "buy" and know what I'm getting instead of downloading 8 versions of some album and crossing my fingers that at least one of them has a bit rate of higher than 96 and and hoping that some stoner didn't override the tags with his own stoner spelling abilities.

    49. Re:BitTorrent by omeomi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The old 'viruses only target popular platforms' meme relies on the assumption that every platform is exactly secure as every other platform, and that is provably false.

      Actually, I didn't say anything about viruses only targeting popular platforms. I said "for the most part, nobody is really writing viruses for OSX", which is true. There are far more viruses being written for Windows. I didn't attempt to explain the reason for that, though. It could be that Windows s more popular, or it could be, as you suggest, that OSX is more secure, and thus virus writers gravitate to the less secure platform. I don't know (or care). I would have to think that it's a mixture of the two, to be honest. There's more software in general for more popular platforms, so it's no huge surprise that there would also be more viruses.

    50. Re:BitTorrent by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Compadre, I must say that you have balls the size of Manhattan to have that user name and to be posting from any foreign country.

      Namaste and cheers!

      (And thanks for the info.)

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    51. Re:BitTorrent by Stratocastr · · Score: 1

      In China, $1 is like a week's worth of lunch money.

      --
      Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
    52. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bittorrent is going to be a civil matter.

      You can't be sure of that.

      (1) shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, of 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500

    53. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone installing a 9 year old OS deserves what they get.

    54. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

      Brought peace.

      Oh. Peace? Shut up!

    55. Re:BitTorrent by He+who+knows · · Score: 1

      Especially two women and one cup.

    56. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I was going to post this, but got beaten.... twice.

    57. Re:BitTorrent by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      In China, $1 is like a week's worth of lunch money.

      If you're a peasant, and there are hundreds of millions of them. However, they don't have MP3 players, computers, or Internet. This is for the middle class, who can afford $1/disc.

  2. And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the US by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "but we make more money as the amount of customers is growing rapidly."

    Brilliant business model there, Taobao. I used to feel bad that Amazon's MP3 Service only worked inside the United States but now it's pretty clear: I doubt Apple will have much luck prosecuting anyone in this case whereas it would have been different had it happened on American soil.

    I'm sure the Chinese government will help protect Apple's ... hahahaha sorry, couldn't quite say that with a straight face. Seriously, we must look like ripe-for-the-picking rubes to places like China. They're sitting there with free copies of Vista, Adobe Suites and now cheap "legal" music. I guess it will forever remain a mystery to them why their nation isn't home to prosperous software & music industries while the status quo is free for the taking with no repurcussions.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. hmmm by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Funny

    use safari on your iPhone to buy the fake iTunes card.

    It's like curb stomping apple after you kick them in the nuts.

    More seriously, there's a good chance that if Apple does decide to change their key system that a lot of legitimate iTunes cards are gonna be rendered worthless.

    And that would suck.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:hmmm by Golddess · · Score: 1

      More seriously, there's a good chance that if Apple does decide to change their key system that a lot of legitimate iTunes cards are gonna be rendered worthless.

      Why did they even go with a system where the value of the card is written right on the card itself (even if it is encrypted), rather than one that everyone else seems to use? That is, a system where on one of Apple's servers somewhere, there resides a database with the giftcard ID and the balance of the card. Just guessing at exactly how it's done, but given that a Best Buy giftcard can be loaded up with any amount, and can be used without a magnetic reader, I think it's safe to say that the balance is not written on the card in any way, shape, or form.

      Or have they done it that way, and these companies are just selling giftcards that could have potentially already been used?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      because apple servers are made to look pretty, not do calculation or real work

    3. Re:hmmm by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      The card doesnt hold value at all - it's a scratch-off card with a key you enter into iTunes and get credited that amount into your account.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    4. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But these are physical cards. Apple could just say "mail them to us, we'll ship you new valid ones and cover postage".

    5. Re:hmmm by Golddess · · Score: 1

      The card doesnt hold value at all - it's a scratch-off card with a key you enter into iTunes and get credited that amount into your account.

      Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what your saying, but if the card contains a key in which some amount is encrypted within, then it could be said that the card holds value, right? I'm just trying to understand what you're saying, because you don't seem to be saying that the key does not contain the amount.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    6. Re:hmmm by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I doubt Apple is too keen on providing Best Buy with access to their gift card database in order to load up an empty card. I don't work retail, but I can't imagine there's a system in place similar to Paypal's IPN that could allow retailers to instantly notify Apple that a card has been sold and should be activated.

      In both cases, it means that these knockoff keys could well exist on legitimate gift cards. I, for one, would be quite pissed to have come home with a $200 gift card only to find out that it's already been redeemed by someone who paid $3 to a guy with a keygen.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    7. Re:hmmm by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      There's exactly that system for Retail gift cards. The idea is you can stock gift cards to be redeemed at lots of different places, but those cards are worthless until activated. When you purchase one, it'll be activated by the store EPOS talking via a third party gateway to indicate that the card sold is now "live". Much the same method's used for eTopup cards for mobile phones etc. Common payment gateway companies (which make a nice living on commission) are Blackhawk, Paypoint and Coinstar.
      Doing it this way reduces theft, and it reduces the amount the retailer has to pay in advance (they're only charged on the bank reconciliation when card activated).
      I'd assumed iTunes cards were exactly the same and to be honest, if they aren't, I don't understand why.

    8. Re:hmmm by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The existing POS software doesn't run on a Mac?

  4. Ouch. by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd be interested to know what algorithm was being used for the keycards. Did Apple use a weak scheme, did someone leak the secret, or (most interestingly) has someone managed to crack a good encryption algorithm.

    (Alas, I'd guess it's probably a weak scheme. As recently as two years ago I noticed a bike products retailer was actually using sequential codes for its gift cards)

    1. Re:Ouch. by teh+moges · · Score: 4, Informative

      I actually didn't think this would be possible.
      In Australia, when you buy mobile phone recharge (extra credit to make calls), you buy a coupon which is only activated after its brought from an authorized dealer. Once the code is used, that code is useless.
      It does mean that each retailer has to have some connectivity to base office, but it stomps out generating new keys as much as you want.

    2. Re:Ouch. by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Picking nits here, but this kind of key generation is generally not considered encryption.

    3. Re:Ouch. by cowscows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. The way this is explained makes it sound like if I pulled a stack of iTMS cards off the rack at walmart or whatever and walked out with them in my pocket, they'd all be valid and would work. I have a hard time believing that to be the case. There are hundreds of stores (both online and physical) that sell gift cards at other stores, I have a hard time believing that it doesn't generally work more like you describe, and I also have a hard time believing that Apple would have done it differently.

      Unless maybe the people generating the card numbers has found a way to falsely activate them? Although if that were the case, I'd imagine that'd be a much easier fix.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:Ouch. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative

      >but it stomps out generating new keys as much as you want.

      Sort of. As the previous poster was alluding to, if the card numbers are generated sequentially and stored on the card, all you need to do is know your number, add about 100, put that number on your card, and wait for it to be activated so you can use it. You don't have to access the main server: you just wait for your number to show up.
      There was a neato scam running a while back where people would steal piles of seemingly useless blank gift cards, record the number off the card into a database, put them back in stores, wait a month, then try and use the number. If the card had been activated but not used (a gift card sitting in a present or a wallet somewhere) they bought what they could as fast as they could.
      I assume companies now sell entirely blank cards, that are programmed at time of sale, rather than pre-enumerated cards merely being scanned for activation.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:Ouch. by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Informative

      no they still use the pre numbered cards. now they have a foil covered pin on the back but who would notice if it was missing.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Ouch. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Informative

      They work right off the truck. No activation.

    7. Re:Ouch. by HatofPig · · Score: 2, Informative

      At Loblaw's our President's Choice gift cards need to be peeled out of the frame they are inset into, with backing. There's no way to get anything off of the card until then. Plus the frame holds the little hole so you can hang them on the shelf.

      And phone cards all just have identical barcodes. The POS system then generates their activation code upon confirmation of payment, and prints it on their receipt.

      This is in little ol' Canada, by the way.

      --
      Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    8. Re:Ouch. by faedle · · Score: 1

      Funny. The ones I buy at Target, 7-11, etc. here in the US do.

      Maybe that isn't how the system works in China. But I've actually gotten burned once by a card that was not activated properly. It was easily fixed, but at least here in the US, the cards on the shelves are inert until activated.

    9. Re:Ouch. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If Apple used sequential keys for gift cards, they deserve what just happened. That's pure incompetence.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:Ouch. by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Xbox Live subscription and points cards do not require any activation. In fact, the only identifier visible on the packaging is the UPC code. There are no serial numbers on the package. The only serial numbers is on the card, behind a tear off panel.

    11. Re:Ouch. by HyperJ · · Score: 1

      I remember in the UK when they first released the "stratch-it" lottery cards, shop workers were taking all the big wins. By scanning the barcode on the reverse of each of the cards, a win was indicated. This was supposed to be a safety check to confirm cards were real and to verify wins. They did catch on and made the barcode only available by scratching off a panel, thus making the card void.

    12. Re:Ouch. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      I heard it's rot-26.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    13. Re:Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many credit card companies do.
      One in particular I know of still does.
      Visa Gift Cards, even (!).

    14. Re:Ouch. by I7D · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I read that in your blog. You know, the Bob LobLaw Law Blog.

      --
      Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
    15. Re:Ouch. by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      > all you need to do is know your number, add about 100,
      > put that number on your card, and wait for it to be activated
      > so you can use it.

      I worked on such cards many years ago and just doing this would not work. The systems would have a large number of trap codes. For example 5-20 random numbers out of every hundred are removed, or generated using alternate checksums. So generating just a string of sequential numbers would trigger the trap. With the trap activated you could then map it to a bank of numbers to check for and cancel them.

      But I am guessing Amazon didn't do that. Also your blank giftcard scam would probably work but again if they have an anyway secure system put up the system would cop onto someone entering in inactive numbers over and over and pull those numbers from the system.

    16. Re:Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They work right off the truck. No activation.

      Don't you mean tubes?

    17. Re:Ouch. by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      There's two ways to generate the keys ... you generate a number, salt it and encrypt it. Or if you don't want to rely on encryption, you random generate it. Either way you just store it in a database afterwards to indicate it's a valid key which can still be redeemed. These systems if implemented correctly are are both secure and have negligible hardware costs for the database in question (small amount of data and easy searches).

      The use of a system which activates the cards is only so the shops don't have to pre-purchase the cards at their retail value (in which case they would want bigger margins) and so they have no value to thieves. It has little bearing on key generation or the security thereof.

    18. Re:Ouch. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      They (iTunes cards) require activation in the UK.

    19. Re:Ouch. by russotto · · Score: 1

      I worked on such cards many years ago and just doing this would not work. The systems would have a large number of trap codes. For example 5-20 random numbers out of every hundred are removed, or generated using alternate checksums. So generating just a string of sequential numbers would trigger the trap. With the trap activated you could then map it to a bank of numbers to check for and cancel them.

      I'm not sure how your "trap" works. Bad guy enters the code through anonymous internet connection. If it's not a trap, he gets stuff. If it is a trap, he gets rejected, but that's all. If you cancel any blocks of numbers, you just piss off legitimate customers.

      Anyway, it does work. I had two cards for the company; I noticed the numbers were similar. The company had a way of checking the balance on the cards; I checked some for those in between my two, and some of them worked. The cards had a scratch-off PIN, but the web site let you order without asking for it (!) (I know this because I ordered from my legitimate cards). So, the obvious scam would be get a starting card number on Black Friday, and a couple of days before Christmas, start trying numbers and ordering stuff. Result: a lot of pissed-off people on Christmas when they try to use their cards.

    20. Re:Ouch. by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure how your "trap" works."

      Depends on the nature of the security. In such a case it would be something like.

      Example:
      100 cards with sequential numbers with checksum A.
      Every card that can be divided by 3 use Checksum B.
      Every card that can be divided by 13 use Checksum C.
      Cards ending with 2,27,14,55,98 are trap cards. These numbers are never released to the public.

      Normally when such cards are hacked they would be done sequentially. So the checksum is to stop casual creation of new numbers and the trap cards are if that number is used, then any numbers near the trap card used recently would also be marked as suspect.

      So from what you say they are not employing any serial number protection systems.

  5. Occam's razor by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Possibility 1:
    Apple doesn't use a database for cards, they use a hash even though that would be stupid.
    That hash and algorithm for arranging the data before the hash was cracked even though all the verification is done on the server and thus there is no code out there to reverse-engineer.
    Someone is generating and selling cards using that hash.

    Possibility 2:
    Someone is simply buying the largest email iTMS gift certificate allowed (I checked) with fake or stolen credit card numbers.

    Possibility 1 is possible but unlikely.
    Possibility 2 is very common, very easy and very likely.

    Occam's Razor says people likely people are jumping to an unwarranted conclusion here.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:Occam's razor by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    2. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then surely we can assume that soon all of the fraudulent gift cards will be deactivated as soon as the banks report to Apple that the cards used to purchase them were stolen, right? Wouldn't Apple have a comment on that situation, instead of the "no comment" about the current situation?

    3. Re:Occam's razor by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They HAVE to keep a database for the cards anyway, to keep track of every code that has already been used (can't have you using the same gift card twice now, can they?) How much harder could it be to keep track of every code that has actually been sold? But even then, there is a window of opportunity: if someone can guess your code between the time it is activated and the time you use it, then they've got your gift certificate and you don't. (This really IS stealing.) My advice to anyone who gets a gift certificate would be to use it as soon as possible. Personally, I feel gift certificates are stupid anyway -- why give somebody the equivalent of cash that can only be used at one store and which becomes worthless if that store declares bankruptcy, when you could just as easily give them cash, or a money order, or a check, or any number of other instruments that could be redeemed anywhere. I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it. Couldn't have done that with a check or money order, could I?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Occam's razor by denzacar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Possibility 2 would in no way be profitable - they are selling $200 gift certificates for 11 yuan. About $1.61.
      200:1 money laundering scheme? I don't think so.

      On the other hand, human stupidity implied in the possibility 1 is always a plausible solution to any case involving humans.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    5. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it.

      You just admitted to comitting a Federal crime, son, and a Felony at that. If I were you, I'd shut the hell up and never mention your this "freebie" to anybody.

    6. Re:Occam's razor by jimicus · · Score: 1

      why give somebody the equivalent of cash that can only be used at one store and which becomes worthless if that store declares bankruptcy

      I think a lot of people are asking the same question over here in the UK right now. Over the Christmas/new year period, a number of companies which operated gift vouchers went out of business.

    7. Re:Occam's razor by shird · · Score: 1

      They don't have to keep a database of those used. They can just keep a counter, and allocate out ranges to other stores etc. Just like MAC addresses - all addresses are valid, but there is no central db and nobody keeping a db of all allocated, just a db of ranges and a counter. They would only need to track the use of a card on its first use.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    8. Re:Occam's razor by joebok · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it. ...

      I think that is a crime. If not, it certainly makes you a jerk.

    9. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The owner of the Taobao shop told us frankly that the gift card codes are created using key-generators. He also said that he paid money to use the hackers' service.

      I know it's asking a lot, and I'm not new here, but feel free to read the second line in the summary.

    10. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Possibility 3: Kdawson post.

      Possibility 3 is to ignore his posts.

    11. Re:Occam's razor by pluther · · Score: 1

      You're overlooking the first step: steal the credit card number to buy the iTunes card with.

      That makes it 100% profit, with a quick and easy way to get money off the credit card. Who cares if you throw away 99% of the value of the original credit card? It's not their money they're wasting.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    12. Re:Occam's razor by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Possibility 1.5: Apple uses a database in countries where internet database connectivity isn't a problem, and hashes in countries where they perceive most stores won't have internet connectivity.

    13. Re:Occam's razor by wdavies · · Score: 1

      Third possibility:

      Someone is duping the numbers, and only one person out of N will get the cheap music.

    14. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're overlooking the first step: steal the credit card number to buy the iTunes card with.

      Umm, no he didn't. That is exactly what money laundering is for, covering the tracks of stolen money. It would be ridiculous for them to lose so much of the money in the process when there are many other ways they could be laundering that would allow them to retain a much larger percentage.

      Most likely they have simply figured out a way to generate keys. Crackers do this all of the time with various software, so I doubt it's as complicated as the OP claims.

    15. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it would be money laundering?, nobody said they are using their own illegally earned money.

      They could be simply buy those gift cards with STOLEN credit cards, so plainly they would be stealing money, not cleaning it.

      Also consider there is no cost if they spend their time hacking poorly configured customer databases. It wouldn't be a $199 loss in every card purchase, it would be a $1.61 dollar net profit.

      -linyera

    16. Re:Occam's razor by plover · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I personally know that InComm is an authorizer to companies that sell iTunes cards at retail, and that unactivated cards have no value. No algorithm is used for those cards, other than the non-sequential generator (to prevent my_card_number+1 fraud.)

      But I also know that TFA claims that an algorithm is broken allowing for virtually unlimited generation of cards.

      So either TFA is either wrong or deliberately lying (improbable, but not impossible) or both the algorithm and on-line methods are being used by iTunes (neither particularly odd nor improbable.)

      It's not an XOR situation.

      --
      John
    17. Re:Occam's razor by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Who cares if you throw away 99% of the value of the original credit card? It's not their money they're wasting.

      Anyone who could buy jewelry on Amazon instead for full money value? Or anything else on ebay?

      You know, criminals may be superstitious and cowardly lot (according to Batman) but they are not THAT stupid to throw away 99.5% of the profit away.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    18. Re:Occam's razor by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there would be better things they could purchase and resell for more then a 1% return.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    19. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to keep a database of those used. They can just keep a counter, and allocate out ranges to other stores etc. Just like MAC addresses - all addresses are valid, but there is no central db and nobody keeping a db of all allocated, just a db of ranges and a counter. They would only need to track the use of a card on its first use.

      And how would they "track" it without a database?

    20. Re:Occam's razor by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      200:1 when it's not your 200 is plenty profitable

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    21. Re:Occam's razor by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I said I was _able_ to go ahead and use it; I didn't say I _did_ go ahead and use it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    22. Re:Occam's razor by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Not as much of a jerk as all the people buying these bootleg iTMS gift certificates... the card had an incorrect address on it which was undeliverable to... so I should have just thrown it away?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    23. Re:Occam's razor by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      If you do that, you have to ship the purchased items somewhere.

      With this, you take receipt of the items over email. Then later you throw the email address away.

      And the best part about this scheme? You've already received all the money for the stolen goods within minutes or hours of beginning to use a card.

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    24. Re:Occam's razor by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      No, you couldn't spend a $25 cheque right away. Mind you, you could drain the sender's account with it.

    25. Re:Occam's razor by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I would imagine that at least some of the gift codes (there are no cards here, just the codes) will be revoked soon.

      As to the "no comment" situation, since when does Apple comment on anything?

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    26. Re:Occam's razor by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why give somebody the equivalent of cash that can only be used at one store and which becomes worthless if that store declares bankruptcy, when you could just as easily give them cash, or a money order, or a check, or any number of other instruments that could be redeemed anywhere.

      Maybe because they'd prefer to get a gift card? When I get cash, I feel like I need to put it in savings, use it responsibly, etc etc. A gift card to a restaurant or store I like to buy fun stuff in is permission to have fun with it. If you're giving them a gift with the intention of them having fun, a gift card says that clearly. Of course, not everyone feels the same way I do, but part of the point of giving one gift over another is knowing which one the receiver would like most to receive, rather than just which one you'd rather give...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    27. Re:Occam's razor by IonOtter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it.

      Well that explains where my sister's gift card to Victoria's Secret went?

      --
      [End Of Line]
    28. Re:Occam's razor by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You write "return to sender" on it and send it back out the next day.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    29. Re:Occam's razor by Sheafification · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I said I was _able_ to go ahead and use it; I didn't say I _did_ go ahead and use it.

      That's irrelevant. Based on the fact that you knew it was a Christmas card with a gift certificate in it the GP inferred that you opened the mail which was not addressed to you. Which is a no no (last paragraph).

    30. Re:Occam's razor by torkus · · Score: 1

      Circuit City in the US had the same problem. Bankruptcy = dead gift cards. I think even bankruptcy protection is enough to get that result.

      While GC's are cute "oh, you know i like to shop at so-and-so" and they do offer the ability to recover the balance if you lose the card...well assuming you kept all the info/receipt which hardly anyone actually does...cash is still much more useful.

      Heck, i've got a well-intentioned $20 gamestop GC sitting here from god knows when that I won't use because I can't think of anything they sell there I'd want.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    31. Re:Occam's razor by torkus · · Score: 1

      But why not keep a DB of used up cards?

      I mean, if you're going to host a whole store with a multi-TB download catalog...what's the big deal with a DB that has even 10 million (simple) records in it? And that assumes 10m GC's were used since they generate them via algorithm they only have to track used ones.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    32. Re:Occam's razor by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I feel gift certificates are stupid anyway -- why give somebody the equivalent of cash that can only be used at one store and which becomes worthless if that store declares bankruptcy

      It depends. Are you self-employed? Do you itemize? Do you make any gift for people who work for you or with you? To tell you the truth, I don't know the first thing about doing taxes, I just focus on keeping good records (which is damn difficult for me as it is), and then I just let someone else decide whether those gifts I made can be deducted -- or not.

      Also where it comes to family, I think gift certificates are a subtle way to try to impose judgment and control your relatives. For instance, if you think your nieces and nephews are getting way too many toys all the freaking time, give them a gift certificate to a type of store you're sure has no toys in them. Or if you have a relative who happens to hate Walmart, be sure to give her a gift certificate to Walmart.

      So when it comes to family, it's really the underlying judgmental message that counts, and it's not nearly as fun for the giver to give just cash.

    33. Re:Occam's razor by torkus · · Score: 1

      Though if by some quirk it was addressed to HIM (or his address with no particular name) he's legally entitled to keep it, used it, or buy german poo porn with it.

      Mail that's simply mis-delivered...yeah toss it back in the box and it will get to the right person easily enough.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    34. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Someone is simply buying the largest email iTMS gift certificate allowed (I checked) with fake or stolen credit card numbers.

      Certainly there are better ways to launder $200 in stolen credit card dollars, than selling them as an iTunes gift card for $2.60? Losing 97% during the laundering process is amazingly inefficient.

      If this is a fraud, I'm going to guess that it's a little more complex than just stolen credit card numbers.

    35. Re:Occam's razor by torkus · · Score: 1

      True, but then why not purchase other online-deliverable goods that resell for more than .5% of their value?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    36. Re:Occam's razor by Monkier · · Score: 1

      okay's there's a couple of caveats to this comment.. 1. it relies on my failing memory. 2. it mentions something i don't really condone (and has probably already been fixed). 3. its anecdotal evidence to support your possibility 2 - totally anecdotal.

      I swear that i recall an article on engadget that said you can bypass the transaction fees on a coinstar machine machine by: depositing your coins, reaching around an unplugging the phoneline at the back, and selecting 'itunes gift card'. the machine gets confused, and dispenses your cash without subtracting any transaction fees. so why would they machine need a phoneline if the card is totally hash based.

      caveat 4. the phonecall is a fake or a 'future feature'?? 5. itunes gift cards operate differently in china.

      this could be article i'm thinking of: http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/07/hacking-a-coinstar-machine-to-bypass-transaction-fees/ - which has since been 'corrected'.

    37. Re:Occam's razor by hydromike2 · · Score: 0

      also it shows the person took the (little bit of) time to go an get you something other than just pulling a 20 out of their wallet

    38. Re:Occam's razor by schmiddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just admitted to comitting a Federal crime, son, and a Felony at that.

      Mail fraud? Pssh. That's small potatoes. Back in my wilder days, I once kept the NYPD busy with various bomb threats, including a real bomb set off in a subway station near the NY Fed.

      While the police were on a wild goose chase, my team of vaguely Germanic-sounding villains drove a dozen stolen dump trucks into the basement of the bullion repository in the basement of the Federal Reserve, loaded them up, and drove away with over $100 Billion worth of gold. How's that for admitting a felony online?

      --
      http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    39. Re:Occam's razor by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Unsolicited stuff sent through the US mail has to be considered as a gift.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    40. Re:Occam's razor by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but your sister gets the last laugh... the damn panties and bra don't even fit me!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    41. Re:Occam's razor by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      Given that they aren't actually paying for the cards, it isn't important what the resale is as a percentage, but what it is as a total amount.

      If you find something that resells for 50% of value but you can only sell 1 a week, did you come out ahead?

      I think you're just seeing this as the market at work. Whomever is selling these numbers (not the reseller mentioned in the article, but his source that he speaks about) is just trying to sell as many as possible as fast as possible. Strike while the iron is hot, if you get a hot/fake credit card number, get as much money out of it as possible as fast as possible, because maybe your source for these numbers is selling them to someone else too. If you don't use it today, it may not work tomorrow.

      Also, perhaps Apple doesn't check their credit card numbers for being real as well as other places. Maybe Apple doesn't check them AT ALL for a couple days, which they do with regular ($0.99 purchases).

      Who knows for sure? I just find it really unlikely Apple doesn't have a database they consult for gift code redemptions. So someone is managing to get entries into that database, and that's either by hacking the database (unlikely) or just by buying the numbers legitimately (likely). And the latter only makes sense financially if they do it with fraudulent purchase info.

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    42. Re:Occam's razor by denzacar · · Score: 1

      What exactly is 200:200 if it is not your money?

      SUPER-EFFECTIVE!?

       
      For fuck's sake!
      Is it so hard for Apple fanboys to accept the possibility that anything-apple IS actually run by regular, fallible humans, capable of a major screw-up?

      So much that they would rather accept that a bunch of Chinese are willing to go to jail (possession of stolen credit-card numbers, credit card fraud, tax evasion...) over a dollar-fifty then that somewhere at Apple-store someone simply FUCKED UP!
      This is fucking borderline racism. "Chinese would be happy with 200:1 payout".

      Think about it for a second for fuck's sake.
      If YOU had electronically transferable valuable marketable goods that has a fixed price in one part of the world - would you sell it locally for 1/200th of it's value?
      Or would you go on the interweb and find someone in that distant part of the world and sell the fucking thing for what would seem to him a bargain price of 50-90% value?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    43. Re:Occam's razor by denzacar · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you do that, you have to ship the purchased items somewhere.

      There is this strange concept called "rented apartment", I'm not sure if you have heard of it?
      Have all the goods delivered within couple of days, loaded on a truck and then make like a tree and get out of there.

      Also, you could sell stuff directly to other people.
      Open up a store on ebay or amazon for real items - with an attractive discount.

      - People come, pay you real cash over amazon or through paypal,
      - You buy items from somewhere on the internet using your stolen cards and mail them directly to your customers.
      - Wait a bit.
      - Profit!

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    44. Re:Occam's razor by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

      why give somebody the equivalent of cash that can only be used at one store and which becomes worthless if that store declares bankruptcy, when you could just as easily give them cash, or a money order, or a check, or any number of other instruments that could be redeemed anywhere.

      Because giving a gift card puts a veneer of thoughtfulness on what is otherwise a very lazy gift of cash.

    45. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I get cash, I feel like I need to put it in savings

      Too bad the other 99% of the country doesn't think that.

    46. Re:Occam's razor by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      turning about to be canceled credit cards into actual non-canceled money is the trick.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    47. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it.

      You just admitted to comitting a Federal crime, son, and a Felony at that. If I were you, I'd shut the hell up and never mention your this "freebie" to anybody.

      You would need to define "Christmas," "accidentally," "able," "use," and most of all, "is" (which wasn't used in the sentence but which, due to the modifications that would propagate through the English language if "is" were misdefined, it is important to define this word).

      Actually this reminds me of a Law Enforcement class I once took in high school. It was taught by a police officer, specifically a police investigator. Prom night, there was a huge party at some guy's house. There was all kinds of stuff going on over there that, uh, probably wasn't legal, but IANAL and I definitely was NOT present at said social gathering. (Honest!!) Someone videotaped the party. That person thought it would be really neat to bring the videotape in to this Law Enforcement class and watch it with the class and with the teacher/police investigator!!! (This is how I know about the, uh, questionable activities that allegedly took place at the alleged party.) Later that day, I happened to see someone telling the gentleman whose house that was about the screening. He flipped his lid! You should have seen how pale and white and nervous he became! "You showed the video in LAW ENFORCEMENT?!?!?!" I'm not sure if he was upset about infringement on his copyright over the video or if there was some other subtler reason that he was upset. But he was definitely upset! Little did he know, the teacher/cop thought it was funny and nothing happened. No one got busted. Ah well, even if someone could get busted the statue of limitations has definitely expired on that one. It was 15 years ago!! Damn, has it been that long? Ah, the good old days of yesteryear.

    48. Re:Occam's razor by oftenwrongsoong · · Score: 1

      We'll call the person I'm about to tell you about, Bob. Name changed to protect the guilty. Bob is someone I know through a friend. He found a U.S. postal money order for $300 sitting on a desk in a library. There was nothing written on it, so he took it, wrote his own name on it, and deposited it in his checking account. Little did Bob know that the proprietor of said postal money order, let's call this person Alice, had the little stub that you tear off the top. And the stub has the serial number of the money order on it. And within a short time of the money order being cashed, the post office can produce for you a nice printout of the money order as imaged by the bank. It was an easy matter to locate Bob. Charges were filed. Bob was not actually convicted. He paid Alice back every cent and somehow convinced Alice and the police to drop the charges. The fact that Bob found the money order apparently lost or abandoned, unmarked and unidentified, helped Bob's case. But it could have been a year in jail. Bottom line, don't steal. Are you willing to risk the consequences?

    49. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's irrelevant. Based on the fact that you knew it was a Christmas card with a gift certificate in it the GP inferred that you opened the mail which was not addressed to you. Which is a no no (last paragraph).

      What if he had not noticed that the card was addressed to someone else before he opened it?

    50. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ability to recover the balance if you lose the card...well assuming you kept all the info/receipt which hardly anyone actually does

      I am pretty sure that every gift card I ever received stated on the back something to the effect that since the card is transferable and is not specifically in anybody's name, if you lose the card, you lose the balance. I think Americans Express Travelers Checks are the only thing you can recover the balance on if lost.

    51. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I once received a mobile phone and had to sign for it. Ir was not in my name but was sent to my address. I duly signed for it, waited 28 days and then sold it. Under UK law this is legal. I do not have to return it or even inform the company that they have sent it to me. If however I get a knock on the door or a request to return the item then they can legally come and pick this up from me within 28 days.

      Even if the phone is duly reported lost or stolen after the 28 days then sorry, UK law permits the sale so it is entirely legal. I just wish they had sent me more phones ;)

    52. Re:Occam's razor by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I think even bankruptcy protection is enough to get that result.

      Anything is enough to give that result, because gift vouchers/cards are more or less entirely unregulated. They essentially amount to an agreement that you pay the store now and someone - anyone - can come in and pick up items to the value of whatever you paid them. Subject to terms and conditions like "if we decide tomorrow to abandon this scheme and nullify anything issued under it, that's your problem".

    53. Re:Occam's razor by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Bombs and grand larceny? Pssh, that's small potatoes. Back in *my* younger days, I invaded a small African country. Beat that, slashdotters!

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    54. Re:Occam's razor by Nitage · · Score: 1

      Depending on exactly what he meant by 'delivered accidentally' and on what jurisdiction he lives in (not everyone lives in the USA with you 'Federal' laws) he may have been the legal owner of the gift certificate.

    55. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subject to terms and conditions like "if we decide tomorrow to abandon this scheme and nullify anything issued under it, that's your problem".

      Such Ts & Cs are completely invalid under most consumer law setups.

    56. Re:Occam's razor by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      I agree. Just handing out cash as gifts is kind of crass, like saying, "I didn't feel like making the slightest effort to get a gift for you...here, go do it yourself." At least a gift shows the giver thought about the recipient in some way.

    57. Re:Occam's razor by mxs · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't buy the "use it responsibly" angle. If you need permission to have fun with your very own money, there is something wrong. And if you really wanted to put that gift certificate into savings, go to eBay, sell it, and put the proceeds into savings. There, I just ruined all your gift certificates for you :P

      A gift certificate gives exactly the same message as cash (depending on your point of view that would be "I didn't have any idea what to get !" or "I'd rather you choose the perfect gift yourself !"). Personally I like to buy myself stuff you can't buy at stores that sell gift certificates.

    58. Re:Occam's razor by fl!ptop · · Score: 1

      into the basement of the bullion repository in the basement of the Federal Reserve

      isn't the basement of a basement a wine cellar?

      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    59. Re:Occam's razor by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      Dude,

      Have you considered to lay off GTA for a while?

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    60. Re:Occam's razor by eyal0 · · Score: 1

      It seems like it would be trivial to implement a system to make gift cards. Having thought about it for just five minutes:

      On each gift card you print a serial number and then the HMAC of thatserial number using a super-secret key. (Maybe as simple as concatenating the super-secret key and the serial number then hashing with SHA-1 or whatever is strongest today.) The iTunes store takes serial number and hash result as input.

      That's it. To break the algorithm you either have to discover the secret key, which means that you've broken SHA-1. Good luck breaking SHA-1.

      The point is, if hacking Apple's algorithm involved anything less than breaking a cryptographic algorithm that is believed unbreakable then Apple screwed up.

    61. Re:Occam's razor by edsousa · · Score: 1

      BTW, the first post is posted as AC, and then he posts with his username...

    62. Re:Occam's razor by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      How's that for admitting a felony online?

      Well Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker! Although I must admit, your dastardly plot is much more entertaining than say... shutting down every vital computer network in the world for financial gain.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    63. Re:Occam's razor by TheRealJFM · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I work on security for a major retailer, and people try to screw the system with gift cards all the time. It doesn't work.

      Those cards get activated (i.e. added to a database of purchased cards) by software on the POS system, they're totally useless.

      Try it - walk into a shop and these gift cards will be unprotected on the shelf. Copy the number from the back of a card and punch it into iTunes. Their value will add up to thousands of dollars in one shop alone - what sort of a company would sell cards with what would effectively be cash value without that sort of protection?

      People steal these cards from retail stores all the time. The joke is that they just risked prosecution to steal a worthless piece of plastic.

      Also, I think that's why big stores abandoned gift vouchers. They were stealable and copyable, but a gift card is database checked when you use it, so much much harder to fool a checkout operator with.

      --
      Joseph Farthing
      http://josephfarthing.com
    64. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the one major flaw in Occam's Razor is that it assumes the person analyzing the data:

      1) has an accurate and thorough understanding of the situation

      and

      2) acknowledges, recognizes, and has access to all the relevent information in an unbiased form

    65. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the envelope/packaging was unmarked (no name/recipient) then ignorance is not a valid excuse for breaking the law.

    66. Re:Occam's razor by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Ok, you keep telling yourself that none of the people you buy for think that there is any difference at all between receiving a gift card or receiving cash, just because that's how you feel. Don't bother to ask them their preferences, and if you do, be sure to dismiss them quickly and easily. Remember, gift-giving is all about the giver.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    67. Re:Occam's razor by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I agree with GP, I may not feel obligated to put a check/cash into savings, but cash goes in my wallet, and the check goes into savings at least to start.

      Most of the time I never quite get around to going to spend that money until I forget it was a gift to be spent that way; that money then ends up going to gas or groceries or something to that effect. At best you could say that I have that quantity of extra disposable income that I wouldn't otherwise have had, and so I eventually get some gadget I wouldn't have gotten otherwise. But by that point, all the personalness of it is lost. I'm not thinking of the gift giver two years down the line when I decide I'm going to buy a gizmo that I wouldn't have had I not received the gift way back when.

      Even if I make it a conscious point to go out the very next day and buy something from the intended store worth at least that much, now I'm making much more of a cost analysis decision when considering what to buy. When I'm buying on a gift card, I'm more reckless with what I'll get. It's not money, it's a gift. I'll buy some indulgence I wouldn't have if I was evaluating it at cost. I can more easily absolve myself of the cost of a $100 sprocket when there's a $30 sprocket without as many features but which would be sufficient if I'm putting it on the gift card than if I'm forking over 5 $20's.

      Also the gift card (usually) says the person thought at least somewhat about the sort of things you like. Cash or a check is, "Eh, have some money, I can't be bothered with this." I know that's not really the case (for most people), but it does feel a little less personal.

      To me, receiving a gift card instead of cash is a courtesy which I sincerely appreciate.

    68. Re:Occam's razor by mxs · · Score: 1

      Struck a nerve, eh ?

      I ask people their preferences. Most say cash. Some say they would say cash, but have been brought up not to.

      And yes, gift giving is all about the giver. Think about it. Maybe not in the way you mean, but it is usually a display of affection or comes with expectations; both of which reflect on the giver in the recipient's mind, no matter how thoughtful the gift.

      Now run along and assume things. You do that best.

    69. Re:Occam's razor by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, somebody simply bribed an Apple employee to provide them with the "secret key". What I'm wondering is, once you have the key and the algorithm used to generate the hash, how do you determine which hashes have been activated and which have already been used? Try each one out on the website, then abort the transaction?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    70. Re:Occam's razor by RivieraKid · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't be ridiculous. You have six months, and you are required by law to inform the sender. They are obliged to collect it at their expense, but if they haven't within six months, then and only then, is it yours to do with as you please. The fact that it was not addressed to you, regardless of being sent to your address, means that you just committed an act of treason in the UK.

      Please see section 84 of The Postal Services Act 2000 which states:

      128. Subsection (3) makes it an offence for a person, intending to act to a person's detriment and without reasonable excuse, to open a postal packet which he knows or suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him.

      Why would it become your property after 28 days when the sender doesn't even know it didn't get to the intended recipient?

      Even if the phone is duly reported lost or stolen after the 28 days then sorry, UK law permits the sale so it is entirely legal. I just wish they had sent me more phones ;)

      So now you are seriously telling us that it is legal to sell stolen property, so long as the police don't catch you within 28 days?

      You sir, are an ass.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    71. Re:Occam's razor by ernst_mulder · · Score: 1

      OR they buy a legitimate $1 gift certificate and use its number to create a $200 gift certificate. I can not imagine that they would make the mistake of not linking the part coding for the amount to the part making up the unique identifier. But who knows...

    72. Re:Occam's razor by bored · · Score: 1


      Well, I personally know that InComm is an authorizer to companies that sell iTunes cards at retail, and that unactivated cards have no value. No algorithm is used for those cards, other than the non-sequential generator (to prevent my_card_number+1 fraud.)

      But I also know that TFA claims that an algorithm is broken allowing for virtually unlimited generation of cards.

      There are at least two other possibilities. The first, is that the random portion of the card id generator is using a pseudo random number generator where the initial seed and offset were discovered. This makes it a card_number+1 type of hack. The problem with this is that they are selling the "fake" cards with known values.

      There is another possibility, which is that there are multiple types of gift cards. The ones you buy at retail are actually activated cards, while there may be a subset, hole or second algorithm used to generated cards with fixed values. I find this possibility likely as the gift cards are often given away in prepackaged merchandise, or as part of another transaction. Aka buy this box of cereal get a free $5 itunes gift card. In that case the numbers would either encode the value, or they would be previously generated and activated. In the latter case it would again be a card+1 type hack, but the value would be known ahead of time. In both of these cases, its possible apple isn't loosing any money because it may be the cereal manufacture (or whatever) loosing money.

    73. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the FBI is outside your house....

    74. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, i've got a well-intentioned $20 gamestop GC sitting here from god knows when that I won't use because I can't think of anything they sell there I'd want.

      Sell it on eBay. Or trade it for one that you do want. There are sites that let people trade gift cards - google it.

    75. Re:Occam's razor by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing mistake of fact with mistake of law. The former may be a defense, and the latter is generally not.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistake_of_fact

    76. Re:Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just admitted to comitting a Federal crime, son, and a Felony at that.

      Mail fraud? Pssh. That's small potatoes. Back in my wilder days, I once kept the NYPD busy with various bomb threats, including a real bomb set off in a subway station near the NY Fed.

      While the police were on a wild goose chase, my team of vaguely Germanic-sounding villains drove a dozen stolen dump trucks into the basement of the bullion repository in the basement of the Federal Reserve, loaded them up, and drove away with over $100 Billion worth of gold. How's that for admitting a felony online?

      You must have been a real Die Hard criminal to do something like that.

  6. Invalidated by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The other side to this is that when a legitimate customer buys a card that's code has already been found using a keygen their card won't work, I hope Apple has a refund system. The joys of security through obscurity in action.

    1. Re:Invalidated by Freakstyle571 · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that the odds of that happening are slim to nil. I don't feel like digging for the source but I remember reading somewhere that trying to brute force combinations into iTunes was worthless because it would be incredibly slow and the amount of possible combinations is so high. Plus there is nothing to stop them from issuing the same number twice once a card has been used in the system and the amount has been credited to an account.

      --
      -We think in generalities but live in details.
  7. Heh by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, kicking Apple in the nuts would be buying a fake iTunes card using MyFox on a jailbroken, unlocked iPhone 3G using a different carrier than the one the phone was sold from/for.

    1. Re:Heh by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, that would be feeding them to pigs after cutting them up with a chainsaw after paper cutting them to death after making them watch Mike Tyson eat their children. :-D

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Heh by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't find the +1 "Dear Lord please don't let me have nightmares about that tonight!" mod.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Heh by Henriok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple would probably still make money since you a) bought an iPhone and b) solidified Apple's hold on music distribution online. Apple probably just laughed all the way to the bank, the same way Microsoft, Adobe and Autodesk are laughing all the way to the bank when their software gets distributed mer or less for free in thesemarkets. Some markets are unreachable with western prices, so if you still want to be present on them, adjust your price. Close to free, is good enough.

      --

      - Henrik

      - when the Shadows descend -
    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "fake iTunes cards" didnt you get?
      The word "fake"?

    5. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, because they still got your iphone money. You need to steal the phone from an Apple store.

    6. Re:Heh by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      And since the MPAA/RIAA hijacked the word "steal", I guess you'll be stuck with making an authorized copy of the iPhone instead of stealing it.

    7. Re:Heh by torkus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the hacked gift cards aren't close to free, they're negative income for Apple.

      Apple still pays a share of the purchase price of each song to the record companies regardless of the payment method. Since they're not getting the income side with hacked gift cards, it's a net loss.

      Furthermore, Apple (or the retailer, perhaps) takes an additional loss if a legitimate purchase winds up with the same card number and the user complains. I know I sure would.

      This is a HUGE problem, I'm not sure what reasonable solution they're going to come up with. Knowing Apple they'll just beat up their fanbase a little more and cancel all the GC's or something. Ok, flamebait a bit but...i could see them doing that and just hoping their market domination in MP3 sales overcomes the bad juju.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    8. Re:Heh by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Or they'll simply ask their users to verify their address with a credit card. How many of the Chinese users are going to do that? Zero.

    9. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Instruct retailers to stop selling GCs.
      2. Develop a more secure GC system.
      3. Cancel all old GCs.
      4. Instruct retailers to offer exchanges from old to new GCs.

  8. One would hope. by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    Even Microsoft has a process if you buy a Microsoft Points card and the code doesn't work. Given the request has to go through an approval process that normally takes several days and possibly multiple contacts to verify information. But still....

  9. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You can already get basically anything you can get off Itunes from torrent files for free. You don't have to pay for a card. If you're going to pirate material, you might as well be sensible about it.

  10. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The real comedy will happen when someone in China actually comes up with some IP that they want to make a buck off of. Hopefully an entire cottage industry will pop up in the rest of the world that's devoted to doing nothing but cranking out copies of whatever it is that China suddenly values, and even more hopefully that cottage industry will be named "Fuck You Chinaman, Inc.!"

  11. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I think that will become the downfall of our county.

    Our main products that we're making here are things that can be easily recreated at no cost. Sure, we've got laws that attempt to stop it, but many places don't.

    We've shipped most of our jobs making actual products overseas. And we wonder why China is becoming so powerful? They're making physical goods, and freely recreating our virtual goods.

  12. Time to buy some of these quickly??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So, if one were so inclined and was not bothered by the moral ramifications, would NOW be the time to buy and redeem a bunch of these? And, since you have to use your Apple iTunes account to redeem them, could you be threatened by legal people at Apple?

    1. Re:Time to buy some of these quickly??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      could you be threatened by legal people at Apple?

      I heard a legal person at Apple once threatened someone just for snoring too loud.

    2. Re:Time to buy some of these quickly??? by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      in America you can threaten and in fact actually sue for absolutely anything -- if i think that the shade of pink you are wearing offends my masculinity, i could sue you.
      The real question is would they have any chance of winning?

      (IANAL but i think i'd have no chance of winning, but that wouldn't stop me racking up lots of lawyers fees attempting to do so)

    3. Re:Time to buy some of these quickly??? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      No chance of winning? Ever heard of fraud?

  13. The most important thing has been left out.... by Ogre332 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where can I buy them?

    --
    Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:The most important thing has been left out.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      China.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The most important thing has been left out.... by itzfritz · · Score: 0
  14. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Americans and Europeans contribute to the economic downfall of Western Civilization every time they purchase a product made in the third world.

  15. Let's consider the crypto solution by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Possibility 1: Apple doesn't use a database for cards, they use a hash even though that would be stupid. That hash and algorithm for arranging the data before the hash was cracked even though all the verification is done on the server and thus there is no code out there to reverse-engineer. Someone is generating and selling cards using that hash.

    Let's assume that Apple cryptographers are at least half way competent.

    You could use Brand's eCash scheme in this situation. But, since Apple plays the role of both the Shop and the Bank in this scheme, you can do some simplification. So, what's the specification of this hash?

    • It should be easy for Apple (the holder of some secret key) to generate valid gift certificates, of any amount
    • It should be difficult for anyone else to generate valid certificates (of any amount)
    • It should be easy for anyone to verify the validity of a certificate.

    I think the simple solution is for Apple to generate unique strings (either random, or increasing integers) and sign them using some signature system, concatenating the value onto the plaintext.

    To redeem a certificate, Apple checks that it hasn't been redeemed before, then stores in its database that it has been redeemed. For compactness using increasing integers, store that "all integers less that n have been redeemed".

    Everyone knows Apple's public key and can verify the certificate. Only Apple knows the private key necessary to create certificates. Apple knows its own public key so it can verify certificates. It also knows to only accept each certificate once.

    I'd guess that if I can cook this up in five minutes, Apple can afford hiring someone who can cook it up at least once during their development cycle (I'm not that leet :p).

    (proof of security in the universal composability model is coming straight away; that's called proof by forward reference and it works great in the cookies)

    1. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That check won't work for integers - people won't redeem cards sequentially.

    2. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by zindorsky · · Score: 1

      I think the simple solution is for Apple to generate unique strings (either random, or increasing integers) and sign them using some signature system, concatenating the value onto the plaintext.

      But the serial number on a gift card is not nearly long enough to contain enough data to be any secure kind of public key crypto.

      So smart or not, that's not what they're doing.

      --
      If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
    3. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      people won't redeem cards sequentially.

      I should have made it more obvious that by my design, that's just a compression hack that you can apply to the extent possible.

      As an example, you'd store the list "everything less than one million; one million and five; one million, two thousand and twenty-three; ...".

      It's Big Oh of whatever, but it works fine in practice ;-)

    4. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using anything more than the weakest PKI won't work because the resulting code(s) that the owner has to type in are too long.

      Consider that even a weak 512-bit RSA signature is 64 bytes long and that's the binary version that would then need to be converted to some ASCII form that the user can type in which would be even longer. And this is a weak key that could be cracked in a few months if not weeks. A 1024-bit key would require the user to type in a 200+ byte value. Nobody would stand for that.

      By far the best solution is to generate a strong completely random key that the user types in and store all the keys that have been issued. No counting/hash algorithms or any such nonsense that can be cracked.

    5. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      No counting/hash algorithms or any such nonsense that can be cracked.

      I could guess a random value that has been issued. If Apple accepts any input as a valid certificate, I could guess it by chance, thus cracking the system.

    6. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would you use increasing integers?!

      It's so obvious! You just use random numbers in a large enough keyspace! This seems obvious to me. Is there something I'm missing?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    7. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no concept of the maths involved.

      With any scheme you could guess an issued value by chance. Think about that.

      Even if you managed to guess one value, you did not "crack" anything at all. All you got was one value and then you have to start over. The odds are against you my friend.

    8. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, isn't that pretty much what MS did with their (25-character style) CD keys? And that got cracked anyway too?

    9. Re:Let's consider the crypto solution by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the one other limitation:

      The string has to be short enough that people can enter it by hand into the iTunes store without making too many mistakes or getting frustrated.

      Hmmm... trickier.

  16. steps by prozaker · · Score: 1

    1. hire hackers 2. get keygen 3. ??? 4. profit!

  17. Huh by blhack · · Score: 1

    Any lawyers in here wanna weigh in on this?

    If I were to buy some of these giftcards, apple could absolutely terminate my account, I would expect that, but am I breaking any laws? This doesn't seem to be "breaking in" to anything (although I'm sure a judge would see it that way) so is it still considered some sort of cyber-trespass?

    Doesn't this fall in to the same category as "the vending machine gave me an extra candy bar. I told the maintenance guy, but he didn't care". What if you even went as far as to email steve@mac.com (or whatever his address is) to show that you tried to contact apple?

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like "Document Fraud" or "Forged Finicial Instrument" or some such would be the crime here. But IANAL.

    2. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Apple could sue you, as long as they can prove that you knew (or "should have known") that the card was fraudulent when you purchased and used it. There's not a law against being taken advantage of.

    3. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possession of stolen property seems to fit.

    4. Re:Huh by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:

      Very simple. It's fraud. They are *fake* cards, issued by a forger. Thus, you can be charged with fraud, or similar offences. Possibly even handling stolen/counterfeit goods, *whether you knew they were fake or not*! It's no different to faking a cheque, or a credit card. In the US, crossing state boundaries with such things can be a federal offence, so if you're not in the same state as the Apple store, it gets even worse.

      If you have the *suspicion* that they are fraudulent and / or a reasonable person would suspect them to be fraudulent (by the *court's* definition of reasonable, not yours), you can quite easily be convicted for fraud, or facilitating fraud, or breach of contract (technically a bad cheque is breach of contract and by trying to pass off this card with a retailer, you are saying that it is genuine, hence the sale could be seen as a breach of contract once they find out the money doesn't actually exist - thus they can happily charge you with fraud for the transaction AND breach of contract for failing to pay for the goods another way). It would *not* be as simple as "I just got them from some website." If a reasonable person would have had suspicions, you can *easily* be convicted - it's like saying that this gentleman knocked on the door selling an expensive in-car audio system with the wires cut and dangling, for a pittance. Whether you thought he was genuine or not, you SHOULD have known that he wasn't (just by the price, if nothing else), thus you can be found complicit in the fraud.

      Notification of the breach would certainly work in your favour but isn't an automatic get-out clause. Chances are they would pass it over but ask at which point you became suspicious, where you got it from etc. and expect you to co-operate fully. Don't and those fraud charges pop up but now they know exactly who to aim them at... you.

      Cyber-nothing. It's fraud, plain and simple, no better than making up credit card numbers and using them to buy things on Amazon. You're not the rightful keeper of any funds that you do manage to get authorized, so you're into theft (if someone can prove that *they* were entitled to the number on the card you used), fraud and maybe even counterfeiting if you can't point out where you got them from. Now, considering that Apple are both the issuer AND the recipient of the cards in question, they have a very good reason to prosecute. You've effectively stolen a credit card and then used it to pay your other Visa bill.

    5. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I think receipt of stolen goods might be a legitimate charge. If I recollect correctly, buying a $200 gift card for $20 would lead a reasonable person to assume it was stolen, & wipe out the 'I thought it was legit, really I did judge!' defense.

    6. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you delve into the subtleties of modern cyber-trespass law, let's try a simple test.

      Suppose you buy one of these cards, use it, Apple complains, and you wind up in court. Let's say you take the stand in your defense (this is hypothetical!). And then someone asks you this question:

      "Did you intend to commit fraud?"

      Not "did you break into Apple's system?" or "did you violate section 1 paragraph 3(a) of the Apple iTunes Store card EULA?" Just a simple question about whether you were trying to cheat someone or not.

      If you can say "No, of course I didn't intend fraud," while keeping a straight face, say it believably, not have Apple introduce any Slashdot posts about what you were trying to do, and not elaborate your "no" with any weaselly explanations that basically translate to "I thought I could get away with it, because it might be technically legal," then maybe your question about whether this breaks any laws, is relevant. If you intend to defraud, then it doesn't really matter much whether or not you're breaking some cyber-trespass law: they're going to nail you on good old fashioned "he totally ripped me off and knew what he was doing" fraud laws.

    7. Re:Huh by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      In the UK, I would suspect using one of these cards would class as an offence under Section 3 of the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, or more broadly under sections 2 and 6 of the Fraud Act 2006

    8. Re:Huh by raynet · · Score: 1

      Depending on your local laws, you might have trouble defending yourself if you buy knowingly a gift certificate worth of 100USD with 2USD, goes in the category of, common sense says that must be illegal goods.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    9. Re:Huh by thuerrsch · · Score: 2, Informative

      In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:

      90 percent? More like 20. But then, 90 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot ...

      --
      most of what follows is true
    10. Re:Huh by pbhj · · Score: 1

      It's fraud, plain and simple, no better than making up credit card numbers and using them to buy things on Amazon.

      Absolute piffle.

      It's more akin to buying a pair of Nike branded trainers that were not authorised by Nike (note I don't say not made in their factory!). The only damage is a potential sale to Nike (or Apple in the case in point).

      Stealing money using a credit card is quite different to depriving someone of a potential sale in order to perform copyright infringement of a third parties musical works.

      Of course if the gift card can be used to purchase tangibles the situation is altered immensely. But we're talking about "taking" zero cost copies. Other than bandwidth costs you're not depriving Apple of anything.

      On the subject of fraud, you can not commit fraud by accident. You can not be complicit in being defrauded, either you were defrauded or you knowingly handled stolen goods. No goods were stolen here, if you used the gift card you (or the card seller it might be argued) simply committed copyright infringement by downloading the music without a license, a civil tort. (In my Nike example the seller performed trademark infringement, the trainers are not stolen, again a tort IIRC).

      That aside, a UK jury will never convict someone for buying something cheaply IMO.

    11. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ummm....the majority of the world utilizes a civil law system, not a common law system such as England's.

      Maybe you meant to say that the majority of the world has defined crimes similar to English fraud, but saying that 90% of the world bases their system on UK law is completely and utterly wrong.

    12. Re:Huh by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      "Do you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, believe that a /reasonable/ person would believe that there was nothing untoward in being able to buy US$200 iTunes gift cards from a website in China which advertised other nefarious services, for a price of US$1.61, as an ongoing service?"

      Reasonable doubt would still allow me as a jury member on your fraud trial to convict you if you'd bought numerous $1.61 "$200 gift cards", whether or not you'd posted to a Slashdot discussion on the subject.

    13. Re:Huh by xtracto · · Score: 2, Informative

      In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:

      Being an English, by majority of the world he meant Southern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and America (refering to the USA only)... oh! and also tath small Island how was it called? mmm Astralia or something

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    14. Re:Huh by ledow · · Score: 1

      "On the subject of fraud, you can not commit fraud by accident. You can not be complicit in being defrauded, either you were defrauded or you knowingly handled stolen goods. No goods were stolen here, if you used the gift card you (or the card seller it might be argued) simply committed copyright infringement by downloading the music without a license, a civil tort. (In my Nike example the seller performed trademark infringement, the trainers are not stolen, again a tort IIRC)."

      You cannot commit fraud by accident, however, you CAN commit fraud through ignorance and/or lying about whether you knew it was "fake" money. And ignorance of the law is no defence. It's all to whether the *Court* believe that you genuinely had no idea that you can't buy $200 giftcards for $40. Again, it's down to the court's interpretation of "reasonable doubt". Additionally, if you were defrauded with the actual cards, you can still *technically* be charged with handling stolen goods (look at the WORDS... *handling* - not "collusion" or "conspiracy" etc.) if at *any* time the COURT believes that you should have known they were stolen... i.e. if you read about it in the paper the next day and don't inform the rightful owner / police.

      You have used counterfeit cards to *purchase* perpetual licenses to a piece of music. Your analysis is like saying that using a fake football ticket to get into a football match that isn't standing-room-only isn't fraud. It *is*. You used the card to pay for a service. You purchased a license. That license is *tangible* - it's also a binding legal contract to pay the license fee and thus using *counterfeit* funds to do so, is fraud. It's no different to paying your TV license with a fake / made-up credit card, or buying a set of crystal glasses with fake Green Shield stamps. It's obtaining goods/services by deception and fraud.

      Your knowledge of whether you knew or not is pretty much irrevelant once it comes into a court... it's what you *should* have known - and a $200 gift card for $40 is almost certainly "obviously in the wrong". The court can't prove that you *did* or *did not* know the goods were illegal... it's impossible without reading your mind. However, they don't need to in such charges because they just have to prove that, beyond some kind of reasonable doubt, you should have known it was wrong, because EVERY person charged with handling stolen goods, etc. will deny knowing about them. The same sort of definitons apply as to mistakes on website pricing - just because the website says that you can get the 47" LCD TV for £3.99, doesn't mean that you can... there's a certain leeway. However, if it was accidentally priced at £399 instead of £449, then you could *try* and get it for that price and might even succeed. It was a *reasonable* mistake. (In that case, however, the retailer is under much less onus to honour the contract because of certain clauses in their terms of sale).

      You can plead guilty or not guilty, but stupidity isn't necessarily an option... otherwise every drug dealer will claim that they have had stuff planted and weren't aware of it and it's *immensely* difficult to *prove* that someone knew they were carrying a bag of drugs. You just need to have the court believe that you *should* have known.

      There may *not* be a theft (permanent deprivation, or intention to commit permanent deprivation of property... a *license* to an MP3 can quite easily be argued to be property whether it exists on paper or not, no different to a license for Windows or Office) of MP3's, but that depends on a court's definition of virtual property, not yours. However, there is almost certainly a theft of funds from Apple in creating fake gift cards and using those to pay for services. However you look at it, using funds that don't actually belong to you to purchase a good/service/license is illegal under several laws, in *virtually* every country in the world (I'd be surprised if it wasn't all of them, actually). The technicalities of what charge

    15. Re:Huh by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Add in India, as well.

    16. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:

      >

      English law is the legal system of England and Wales, not the UK. It is the basis of common law, which is the legal system of most countries which have been, at one point or another, part of the British Empire.

      Civil, not common law is what a large percentage of the world base their legal systems on.

    17. Re:Huh by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      No. On a $200 iTunes card, Apple will pay royalities of X dollars. You using a fake iTunes card gives you $200 to "spend" on ITMS. Apple will pay X dollars in royalties of that, as the card's accepted as real by ITMS. You get $200 spend on music, it costs Apple X dollars to give it to you. You have defrauded Apple.

    18. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a false instrument is the correct uk offense for using a faked cheque I think this is the same, but as an ex uni house mate who was caught using cheques stolen form the back of my cheque book to pay utilities got charged with making a false instrument, burglary and using a false instrument but was then let off by police and ended up working in HSBC's call centre I don't think the risk is that high

    19. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:"

      That's true if your world consists only of English-speaking countries.
      In my world, civil law (based on roman law) is the most common legal system.

    20. Re:Huh by pbhj · · Score: 1

      No. On a $200 iTunes card, Apple will pay royalities of X dollars.

      I doubt it. Royalties from collection agencies (which is what Apple are acting as here) appear to be paid as a proportion of the total sum gathered, minus [large] admin fee. Just as for CD sales, the royalties aren't based directly on the number of CDs printed but on the revenue from those CDs.

      So I'd still contend that Apple will not be out of pocket save a little bandwidth except inasmuch as this hits their legal sale of those licenses.

    21. Re:Huh by pbhj · · Score: 1

      You used the card to pay for a service. You purchased a license. That license is *tangible* - it's also a binding legal contract to pay the license fee and thus using *counterfeit* funds to do so, is fraud. It's no different to paying your TV license with a fake / made-up credit card, or buying a set of crystal glasses with fake Green Shield stamps. It's obtaining goods/services by deception and fraud.

      It's called intellectual property for a reason, it's not tangible (though it can be bought and sold like physical property).

      A license is not tangible, you can make as many licenses as you like for no extra cost than the media you present the license on.

      That aside, a UK jury will never convict someone for buying something cheaply IMO.

      Incorrect. In UK law, handling stolen goods has higher sentences (and higher *average* sentences, even after appeal) than actual theft. It is *not* required that the court prove that you *know* they were stolen.

      Firstly: handling stolen goods !== buying something cheaply.

      Second the CPS ( http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/theft_acts_incorporating_the_charging_standard/#_Other_Offences_under ) disagrees with you saying (referring to the Theft Act 1968, SS22):

      A person handles stolen goods if (otherwise than in the course of stealing), knowing or believing them to be stolen goods he dishonestly receives the goods, or dishonestly undertakes or assists in their retention, removal, disposal or realisation by or for the benefit of another person, or if he arranges to do so.

      In an nutshell, you're wrong.

      I'm not defending fences. Nor was I talking about the meaning of the law in my earlier statement, only my perception of the possible outcome of a jury trial - presumably you've a reference for a case where a jury convicted someone for buying something cheaply where that person had no provable belief that it was stolen? (that conviction would contradict the law incidentally).

      You can *easily* be convicted for buying a dodgy DVD in a boot sale, or a stolen car stereo... if it came to court, at absolute *minimum* you would be required to return the property, possibly make compensation (i.e. pay Apple for the MP3's), possibly pay court costs, maybe even receive a caution.

      Tosh. You got a reference of any sort for someone buying a properly packaged DVD in a car boot sale that was convicted of an offence? Trading Standards rightly go after sellers. There is no way that a buyer could possibly know a DVD is "dodgy" unless it appears "dodgy" - grey imports can be vastly cheaper but are identical products. Tesco got in trouble for grey imports ( http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-tm/t-policy/t-policy-parallel/t-policy-parallel-caselaw.htm ) but I don't recall any of their customers suffering a conviction for contributory trademark infringement, perhaps you know differently.

      If you buy a stolen anything then yes, you're handling stolen goods; again cheap !== stolen.

      Your knowledge of whether you knew or not is pretty much irrevelant once it comes into a court... it's what you *should* have known - and a $200 gift card for $40 is almost certainly "obviously in the wrong".

      For tangible goods yes. For intangibles then you see these sorts of things all the time. One of my ISPs bundles software "worth £250" with a &pound9 domain name ... should I be contacting the police? No of course not, it doesn't cost them that they're only making it available for sale at that price. Similarly Apple could easily offer $200 of itunes for $40 and still be making a profit.

      You get free phones that sell at £200

  18. What's the point? by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they're going to pirate, why do they bother paying $2 to a crook to get music with DRM which they could get for free from BitTorrent? The only advantage iTunes has over piracy is that it is legal - so what's the point of ripping them off with a fake gift card?

    Even ethically, that way they'd at least not be supporting the criminal industry like the RIAA is (in this case accurately) claiming.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, isn't iTunes DRM-free now?

    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's illegal about BitTorrent?
      Please do tell; inquiring minds want to know.

    3. Re:What's the point? by bronney · · Score: 1

      Bit-torrenting music doesn't launder money as efficiently.

      Plus, ever tried giving people a CD full of mp3's for birthday? They'd think you're cheap. Now switch that for a fake Apple Giftcard and all of a sudden you're hip. Worth the 13 bucks.

    4. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your stupid right?

      What about my stupid right? Oh wait, you can't speak English. In that case, you're the stupid one.

    5. Re:What's the point? by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

      Movies on iTunes still have DRM. The other reason would be to purchase iPhone/iPod Touch apps.

  19. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly though, what other choice do you have in most situations? Even many of the high end products now are made in third world countries. Many parts for American cars are built in other countries, even many of the cars are assembled in Mexico now. Japanese cars are often made here, but are assembled using parts made in a foreign country. It's the same situation for almost all electronics.

  20. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why prosecute? If you can identify the illegitimate cards, you can revoke the license to all the downloaded music. Isn't this what DRM is for?

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  21. what the fuck by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    is apple doing even offering a $200 gift card. It seems to me to be an open invitation to fraud.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:what the fuck by mkiwi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    2. Re:what the fuck by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  22. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by neil-ngc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess it probably depends on how valuable Apple's manufacturing business is to China. I'm willing to bet that iPods, laptops and pretty every other physical item in Apple's line is significant enough for them to pay attention. Some people might get disappeared.

    But really, maybe Apple has learned a lesson here. Don't just validate cards using an algorithm. Keep track of which numbers you've sold, same as a credit card issuer.

  23. don't worry . . . . by Veni+Vidi+Dormi · · Score: 2, Funny

    don't worry . . .they're buying fake Apple products.
    Everyone Chinese wins!

  24. DRM free itunes. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe itunes is DRM free as of Jan 6/09
    http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/06/1840225

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:DRM free itunes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      joy. Now the RIAA can point at this and say: This is why we need DRM!!!1

      capcha: Bondage

    2. Re:DRM free itunes. by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe itunes is DRM free as of Jan 6/09

      http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/06/1840225

      Yes but surely with Apple's patented Time Machine technology they can overcome this minor hurdle.

    3. Re:DRM free itunes. by Firehed · · Score: 1

      True (for most tracks anyways - I think a few are still getting swapped over), but it would still be easy enough for Apple to remove any remaining unused balance on the card.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  25. Credit Card Ponzi Scheme by essinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it may even be simpler. I went to the site and, though I couldn't understand the language, it seemed as though you had to buy the iTMS certificate with a credit card! So all they have to do is use your card (or in the more elaborate scenario a previous idiot's card) to buy your gift certificate. And they buy whatever else they want with it.

    1. Re:Credit Card Ponzi Scheme by oftenwrongsoong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I imagine they're doing a superset of what you say. Mr. Idiot gives them his CC#. They sell Idiot a $50 gift card for $1. Idiot thinks all is well. Meanwhile they wait a month or two. Then they start using Idiot's CC to buy other stuff. Idiot goes WTF?! and reports the fraudulent transactions. Hundreds of similar idiots do the same. Some smart law enforcement people cross reference the transactions and find that all people who bought from a certain vendor ended up with fraudulent activity two months later. This happened before. In one example, a restaurant swiped credit cards twice, once to charge the card and once again in a second machine to record the card info. Weeks or months later they'd use the recorded info to buy stuff, until someone cross referenced and found them out. In the restaurant's case, the customers did no wrongdoing. But in this gift card case, the idiots are in some serious trouble. By reporting the fraudulent activity (which they have no idea is connected to the counterfeit gift card they bought), they will incriminate themselves because the same law enforcement people will figure out that the original, intentional, transaction was for counterfeit gift cards. Meanwhile the people running this scheme are in some other country and probably can't be touched. A bad deal any way you look at it, both for Apple and for the idiots trying to rip Apple off for cheap music.

    2. Re:Credit Card Ponzi Scheme by one_in_a_milli0n · · Score: 0

      Extremely popular scheme in Africa. Never, ever, use a credit card to buy anything in Africa. Ever! Not unless you are ready to cancel it any minute!

  26. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you can identify the illegitimate cards

    ..then you can just make them not good for payment, instead of dealing with it at the DRM level.

    "No tunes for you!" is better than "Broken tunes for you!"

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  27. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by SectoidRandom · · Score: 3, Informative

    When it comes to international copyright it is no surprise to me that across borders people are far less inclined to respect copyright laws of another country.

    It reminds me of something that I read once that stated that back in the 19th century before the US had established it's own home-grown authors and publishing industry, it was common place for Americans to simply copy and republish without consent the work of European authors and publishers. That was of course despite the constant complaints of European publishers and governments.

    Of course eventually the US publishers had grown to a position where they themselves realized that they needed copyright in order to continue growing with the now booming local literature scene, hence the "true" birth of enforced US copyright.

    (History repeating itself. Hmm, now how often does *that* ever happen - sarcasm)

    Unfortunately I have no original sources to this 'tale', I would appreciate if anyone can either confirm or deny this with some evidence, as it is such a compelling story I would like to believe that it is true!

  28. Buy them here but . . . by essinger · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would really think twice about using your credit card!

    http://search1.taobao.com/browse/0/n-g,nf2hk3tfom-------2-------b--40--commend-0-all-0.htm?at_topsearch=1&ssid=e-s1

    1. Re:Buy them here but . . . by creamy_red · · Score: 1

      Use a one-time use CC. Many credit cards offer them for fraud prevention during online shopping. You can time and value limit them. Should be the perfect solution to any risk with this, at least as far as the hackers taking advantage of you.

  29. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can't identify the illegitimate cards. Each individual card isn't kept track of. The bar code on each of them is more like the answer to a math problem. If you know how to solve the problem, you get in, no questions asked. The only thing they can do is change the math problem and eventually get rid of the old one as a valid question to answer.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  30. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by mean+pun · · Score: 3, Informative

    Isabella Bird, in her book The Englishwoman in America (1856) mention this copying causally, as something everyone knows.

  31. FYI... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    When you buy goods (gift certificates) with stolen funds (credit cards) so you would sell those goods to a third party and thereby make a profit - THAT IS money laundering.

    And just imagine such a crazy scenario where they would spend not just $200.00 at a time, but drain the entire card to buy items such as jewelry, luxury items, or even iPhones or iPods - anywhere else on the internet.
    You know... items that can be sold almost immediately if you sell it for a right price.
    Or if you use ebay or amazon to sell items for "clean money" - while you pay for them with "dirty money".

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  32. China: One big Black Hole by NineNine · · Score: 3, Informative

    If the Chinese government doesn't start some kind of law enforcement, China is going to be a giant Black Hole. Blacklisting IP blocks from Chinese ISPs is the best thing I've ever done in terms of spam and malware control.

    1. Re:China: One big Black Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't ask the Chinese government to enforce something unless you are okay with people dying or spending absurd time in prison. (I'd be okay with it for spammers and scam artists, but not for counterfeit itunes cards.)

  33. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Zerth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US only recognized domestic copyrights until 1891. Prior to that, foreign works were considered public domain. Mark Twain became a US citizen to protect his writings and lobbied for the International Copright Act.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Copyright_Act_of_1891

  34. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by porges · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gilbert and Sullivan had a big problem with this; people would come to their London openings, write down as much of the words and music as they could, take the boat to America, and put on knock-off productions. For this reason, The Pirates (!) of Penzance premiered in New York, not London.

  35. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Honestly though, what other choice do you have in most situations? Even many of the high end products now are made in third world countries. Many parts for American cars are built in other countries, even many of the cars are assembled in Mexico now. Japanese cars are often made here, but are assembled using parts made in a foreign country. It's the same situation for almost all electronics.

    In a lot of cases, with research, you can actually choose where your goods are made. Sometimes it means they're of much higher quality, too. Other times (LCD televisions, for example) it means you get a mid-range product instead of the more fully featured version made in Korea.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  36. Errm, many here seem to have no clue... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1, Informative
    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:Errm, many here seem to have no clue... by lefiz · · Score: 1

      I was interested to see that the largest denomination offered by Apple is actually $2,500. From the second link: """Apple Gift Cards can be purchased from the Apple Online Store in any amount between $25-$2500.""" I wonder why the hackers don't go for a denomination greater than $200?

    2. Re:Errm, many here seem to have no clue... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I was interested to see that the largest denomination offered by Apple is actually $2,500. From the second link: """Apple Gift Cards can be purchased from the Apple Online Store in any amount between $25-$2500.""" I wonder why the hackers don't go for a denomination greater than $200?

      Errm, those are Apple Gift Cards, not iTunes Gift Cards. The former you use in the Apple store, the latter (you guessed it) in the iTunes Store. ANd the latter come "$15, $25, and $50 denominations" - not in $200. Errm, again.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  37. Looks stupid to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was detailing the whole gift/certificate scheme for apple, I would make sure to record every generated key before it reaches the customer - be it on a plastic card or in email. This way nobody will be able to use a code not issued by me, even if it's valid (based on the codes are really some crypto product).

    However, if this is in place and we still have the Chinese selling keys - there is a serious issue with my security:
    1) some broke and stole my generated numbers - very bad, I'm f0ked cause I'll have to disable all cards & recall all cards.
    2) even if someone got the algorithm to generate valid numbers he's able to test huge amount of keys for validity under my radar, and only sells the one found valid. Bad stuff, customers will buy already emptied cards.

    However the mentioning of keygen in the news means to me Apple does not have any means to distinguish key they really issued from a key issued by Chinese hackers - bad stuff for them in the long run.

  38. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by citizenr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess it will forever remain a mystery to them why their nation isn't home to prosperous software

    WHAT?
    Guess who wrote code that runs on your Digital Picture Frame, your Camcorder, mp3 player, or your big screen LCD TV.
    Maybe you missed the story about 'Shanzai'?
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/27/049245&from=rss

    Wanna know how Chinese are able to go from design on a napkin to working product ready to ship in ONE month? They share, rip, mash-up, copy.
    Here is one of the sites used by Chinese Engineers/Developers to share brainpower
    http://www.pudn.com/

    There is no value in producing IP without a product, IP alone is worth zero. Chinese recognized it long ago.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  39. somebodys gonna get in trouble by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    i don't want to be the guy in china who download a copy of "Chinese Democracy" off iTunes.

    not cause of the govt wordfilter or anything, just because its a horrible album.

  40. As my dad once said... by Winckle · · Score: 1

    At least you can't spend it on drink...

  41. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by nytes · · Score: 1

    The US only recognized domestic copyrights until 1891. Prior to that, foreign works were considered public domain. Mark Twain became a US citizen to protect his writings and lobbied for the International Copright Act.

    Wait, Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) was born in Missouri.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  42. Too wordy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Fake but working iTunes gift cards

    Yes, we have a word for that. The word is counterfeit.

    I'll use it in a sentence for you:

    "The RIAA attempts to convince the public that downloading music is the same as counterfeiting CD's."

  43. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    Mark Twain was born in Missouri - what other steps did he need to take to become a citizen?

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  44. Wow! What useful links - full of technical detail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well,

    Thanks very much for those links, they're really, really useful! Full of technical detail on the algorithm used.

    For instance, check out these facts in the article Lars T linked to:

    * The following letters and numbers can look very similar:
            The letter A and the letter H
            The letter B and the number 8
    * Apple Gift Cards can be purchased from the Apple Online Store in any amount between $25-$2500
    * To report a lost or stolen Apple Gift Card, please contact Apple at any Apple Retail Store location or by telephone at 1-800-MY-APPLE.

    It's exciting technical comments like yours (without even a whiff of smug self-congratulatory superiority) that make slashdot what it is. Thanks for educating all of us on slashdot!

  45. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by rthille · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, given that he _was_ Mark Freaking Twain, he got to choose where he was born!

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  46. Hey, don't complain!! by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    Apple will get all their money back, the cards will be strengthened and best of all, greedy stupid people are going to jail over this and removed from our internet!

    Win-win!

    --
    [End Of Line]
  47. Re: freebie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once received a gift certificate in a Christmas card that was delivered accidentally to my address, and I was able to go ahead and use it.

    You just admitted to comitting a Federal crime, son, and a Felony at that. If I were you, I'd shut the hell up and never mention your this "freebie" to anybody.

    ?? I don't think spending somebody else's gift card is a felony, or a Felony. It's definitely not a Felony when the mailman messes up.

  48. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by torkus · · Score: 1

    Ah...but that costs money!

    Apple took a shortcut perhaps thinking no one would figure it out but once again 'security through obscurity' fails in a wonderfully fun way. I really don't have much sympathy for them though.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  49. A shining example of why Wikipedia needs work by sirwired · · Score: 1

    The paragraph in Wikipedia you got that from was a freaking disaster zone. Incomplete sentences, jumbled meanings, utter crap. (Mark Twain had to establish Canadian residency to have at least one of his works protected there. (That was in the linked article.))

    I've (likely badly) fixed that up, using information from the linked article.

    Wikinuts could say this shows the strength of the model, since I, Joe Nobody, was able to correct it. I can counter that with the fact that not even a mere copy editor would have let that utter nonsense through.

    1. Re:A shining example of why Wikipedia needs work by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Frell. I thought it was odd. Teach me to C&P.

  50. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    refresh my memory, did China have something I wanted?

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  51. The Vendor said it? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    A shop owner said that the vendor told us that they cracked the code.

    Now...WTF does the shop owner know?

    Would he sell them if the vendor told him "we buy them using stolen credit cards and sell them to you?"

  52. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a close analogy:

    ISBN numbers are made out of a series of numbers identifying the language, publisher, imprint and title/edition. The last digit is the mod 11 of the sum of the numbers, each multiplied by a weighting digit based on its position in the string. To make a barcode you have three different image patterns for each digit. The last six are all represented by type "R". The first one is not represented, except for defining a pattern of "L" and "G" types for the first six numbers, and encoding itself in the process. Interesting programming exercise in the language of your choice.

    So all you have to do is reverse engineer the method used and you're there..although I suspect Apple's system is somewhat more technically challenging.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  53. Nigerians in China ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do you know the cards work? Has anyone bought one?

    What if the whole thing is a scam whereby you send your couple of dollars over only to find out the cards really are fake. What will you do? Tell the police you got ripped off trying to buy a $200 card for a couple of dollars?

    If there's enough idiots out there buying into this scam it could generate a tidy sum.

  54. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    You can't identify the illegitimate cards. Each individual card isn't kept track of.

    If what you say us true, and I have no knowledge to the contrary, how dopey is that?

    The Multi-State Lottery's "Mega Millions" jackpot recently reached $212,000,000US and within two hours, it was known a winning ticket was sold and where it was sold. Lottery systems know which numbers are printed and where and the Mega Millions games typically sells 100,000,000 tickets when the jackpot hits huge numbers.

    Would it be so hard for Apple to do the same?

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  55. Re: freebie by edman007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is a federal crime to open mail shipped through the United states postal service that has not been delivered to the addressee.

    http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001702----000-.html

    when the mail man messes up they don't open it (and there are exemptions somewhere to allow them to open it when required). If you receive something not meant for you then you should give it back to the post office, don't open it.

  56. Re: freebie by dexmachina · · Score: 1

    YANAL

  57. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by mlts · · Score: 1

    What Apple should have done was create a large database with random numbers, and each random number is cross references to a currency value such as USD 10, 5 Euro, etc. This database is used to print numbers and kept offline. Each number is then hashed with a SHA-512 hash, and that hash is stored on the validation server.

    Of course, a cryptographically secure random number generator is used to generate the numbers so one can't obtain one number by knowing the value of its predecessor and sucessor.

    This would allow iTunes to validate numbers, but prevent people from generating new numbers other than actively hacking the backend database and adding new numbers. Nobody who has no access to the database would be able to generate bogus numbers.

    Of course, perhaps add a check digit or checksum to stop typos.

    Failing to do a system like this and relying on an algorithm system will end up just having it cracked and a keygen available.

  58. so share... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you use to blackhole them? I think many people would like to, but I was under the impression the IP ranges were not contiguous/simple...

    1. Re:so share... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=block+china+ip

  59. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    As others have noted, the US has had federal copyrights since 1790, and state copyrights slightly before that. But for quite a while we only granted them to US citizens. When foreign authors would complain that they wanted US copyrights, the standard reply was to invite them to emigrate to the US.

    Personally, while I loathe the idea of copyright treaties, since they hinder important reforms, such as shorter terms, lesser protection, registration formalities, etc., I do think that the US ought to unilaterally grant national treatment (i.e. treating foreign authors just the same as domestic ones). After all, the point of copyright is to promote the progress of science, and the nationality of the author really isn't important in that light.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  60. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by barthrh2 · · Score: 1

    Because they don't create cards on the fly through electronic terminals. They are sold from the shelve of Apple stores, grocery stores, corner stores.... They are pre-printed and usable without activation. There is no way to follow a card.

  61. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your job?

  62. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each individual card isn't kept track of.

    Why not?

  63. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by omeomi · · Score: 1

    And we wonder why China is becoming so powerful? They're making physical goods, and freely recreating our virtual goods.

    Yeah, it couldn't be the 1.3 billion citizens...

  64. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a very simple way to do this - use a public key system - using a 2k rsa key encrypt numbers 1 to 100 million - any random number is potentially a key, but only those below the threshold of the number sold are valid - and once it has been used once, remove it from the list. there is no (practical*) chance of anyone ever guessing a valid number, and if anyone breaks the system you have bigger worries than a few free vouchers ....

    thats how i'd run serial numbers for anything i did - you can have the code to check a serial publicly available, but knowing how that doesn't help generate real ones. - you could even use a 4k key, and use the upper 2k bits as flags to indicate what specific features a particular serial number is valid for.

    *practically impossible is anything less than 1 in 10^100 : the number of atoms in the universe (10^80) * number of second universe would be in existence (10^18) (the factor of 100 is added in just to make sure, and because 100 is a nice round number and 98 isn't)

    in the example given the chance of guessing a code correctly is 10^8/2^2048, or slightly more than 3 in 10^608

  65. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

    yeah, a very large (and increasing) fraction of the worlds manufacturing capacity.

  66. Um by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this cost apple money big time? I don't mean lost sales, I mean apple has to pay developers / artists monetary value for every song "purchased". If your not contributing into's apples "royalty fund" then its coming out of their own pockets. This is probably theft in the truest form.

    Of course, "lets only allow verified codes" probably went into the same idea bin as "lets allow copy and paste for the iphone".

  67. Itunes by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    Even though its free I still won't use it.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    1. Re:iTunes by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I rather download my music from reputable and accountable sources.

      Like PirateBay? What makes iTunes less reputable or accountable than, say, Rhapsody or Amazon or XXXTORRENTS4FREE, or any other legit or illegit source out there? I mean, if it were an accepted fact that Apple is neither reputable nor accountable, than your statement stands on its own, but it doesn't, so you need to qualify your statement.

  68. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Just to add little contrast. You can read what happens in US here
    http://openbts.blogspot.com/2009/01/open-source-and-self-interest.html
    Corporations think they OWN you and your work for the rest of your life, even in California where non-compete agreements are illegal.

    Basically either you decide to share and build your business model around it just like Chinese did, or you wont be able to do anything other than work "for the man" in a cubicle.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  69. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by guydmann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I agree that would be funny. But the real comedy here is that nothing is actually being stolen here. What is really happening is that a new unit of currency is being counterfeited. But that currency is backed by value in digital media, which in and of itself is ephemeral and can be obtained by other means for free. What a bizarre situation.

  70. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by WillyDavidK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, there is no currency exchange going on, the 'gift card' tells iTunes to exempt you from paying for the tracks as you have already presumably payed apple for the gift card. Apple is still paying the artist 70% of the cost of the music being downloaded, and they are paying in real currency.

    --
    For lack of a better signature...
  71. Credit card processing offline! by bonez_net11 · · Score: 1

    Apparently credit card processing is now offline. This means I can't watch last nights "House"? *cry*

  72. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

    what DRM level? iTunes completely eliminated DRM from their music store a while ago...

    --
    For lack of a better signature...
  73. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the lottery makes way more money than Apple does, even after paying out a prize. Remember, for every ticket that wins even a paltry $5, think of how much money is spent on losing tickets. While I'm sure it's technically possible, somebody in the company probably brought up "cost effectiveness" and bought the idea that these things couldn't be forged. The whole idea that you can keep information publicly accessible and always a secret via encryption is at best naivete at it's worst or marketing up to it's normal BS.

    You don't have to attempt every possibility when trying to break a code. Stop when you get lucky and find a match. That's why it's a lie when they say you'd need 10,000,000 computers and a thousand years to break the latest and greatest file encryption. It's highly unlikely that the very last possibility is also correct one. And figure that this analogy only applies to brute force attacks, the time scale goes down once you start bringing in shortcuts such as dictionary attacks, system flaws and the like.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  74. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bastard! Do you have any idea how hard it is to find replacement tubes for my sarcasmometer?

  75. Is it really stealing? by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

    One does have to sit down and think about whether you can actually call this stealing or not. Yes, obviously you are using merchandise that would have costed considerably more in a retail setting, but you have to think about the mechanics behind this.

    For every track and album bought on iTunes, Apple pays 70% to the artist or label who submitted the tracks (generally .70 per track and 7.00 per album) Apple is going to continue to pay the artists for purchases whether they were made with a gift card or not. This means that all of the fraudulent gift cards are essentially just making Apple give the artists free money. When you consider this fact, this is a much more interesting means of pirating music than usual p2p and bit torrent clients, which obviously give the artists nothing at all. And considering the billions Apple has in the bank, the costs to them are honestly pretty negligible.

    It's not that I'm condoning this practice, but if you are stealing music anyways (which, lets face it, most of us are to an extent) at least this way you would really be stealing from Apple, who has a lot more money than the artist, while still actually helping the artist by creating revenue for them.

    Just something to consider.

    --
    For lack of a better signature...
  76. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Informative

    This comment is not just funny, it is silly and obviously from someone who knows nothing about China.

    For one, the Chinese themselves come up with a lot of IP. This ranges from music productions to technical innovations (yes also that, believe it or not). And yes they are copied big time, even though the Chinese government does try to enforce the protection of this IP. And yes it does so much more vigilantly than the protection of foreign IP. Mind that many US and other overseas patents are not valid in China in the first place, patents after all are limited to the countries/areas where they have been applied for and issued.

    If someone comes with a new product in China and has some success, everyone will jump on the bandwagon and make it as well. Even if there is no protected IP involved. If someone starts making plastic coffee cups for example, and makes a good buck out of it, dozens of other factories will spring up and do the same. They all copy one another.

    If you come up with some innovation in China and you really want to keep it for yourself you will have to keep it a secret. Don't tell anyone how you do it. This is why many Chinese are very reluctant to show you their production lines, and often you won't get access there at all. Taking photos of machines is also something that many Chinese really don't like. At trade shows many booths also have a no-photo-taking policy because otherwise within a few days they will find their newly designed jewellery at half the price all over the place. At their neighbour's booth for example (not joking).

    IP in China is as if there is effectively no IP. Everyone copies from everyone with impunity. There is little enforcement, and what enforcement takes place is largely showing off to the outside world, staged media events making it look like something is being done. China can as such be used as case study for what happens if IP would be abolished. And it is overall not a pretty picture.

  77. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Then you are talking about counterfeiting currency, that is considered a far more serious crime than copyright infringement. In China at least that is, I don't know about in the US where it seems the other way around.

  78. What does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the iTunes gift cards in the world can't buy you a copy of Abbey Road.

    1. Re:What does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? The Rolling Stones are shit.

  79. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds like a cause that is better than BitTorrent! Finance the artist through counterfeit gift cards!

  80. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by bit01 · · Score: 1

    I guess it will forever remain a mystery to them why their nation isn't home to prosperous software & music industries

    No mystery at all. Just doing what the US did historically did in similar circumstances. Current US copyright fanatics complaining about third world piracy are just hypocrites. China is a sovereign country and can create+implement whatever "intellectual property" law they please.

    In any case China gets copies that cost the US almost nothing to produce and the US gets a large volume of amazingly cheap consumer products that cost China a lot of man hours to produce. The US is getting the better end of the deal.

  81. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    our English works of good repute being a wanting The facility with which English books are reprinted in America and the immense circulation which they attain in consequence of their cheapness greatly increases the responsibility which rests upon our authors as to the direction which they give whether for good or evil to the intelligent and inquiring minds of the youth of America minds ceaselessly occupied both in religion and politics in investigation and inquiry in overturning old systems before they have devised new ones The Englishwoman in America By Isabella Lucy Bird

    pbhj

  82. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Macman408 · · Score: 1

    That's the silliest claim I've ever heard. If they're not tracking each card individually, that would cause at least two major problems:
    When a card is redeemed, how do they know it hasn't been redeemed before?
    When a card is manufactured, how do they know it hasn't been manufactured before?

    Now that's not to say that they might have difficulty identifying an illegitimate card. Especially if it's a fake that has been manufactured, and has not yet been redeemed. Or maybe their manufacturing folks don't talk with the iTunes folks, and they don't know whether a card has been manufactured - just whether it has been redeemed.

  83. The Real Question is... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The real question is, is this Apple's own KeyGen? Are they generating codes that belong on valid gift cards and rendering those cards useless as apparent duplicates?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  84. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    refresh my memory, did China have something I wanted?

    Do you want a PC/laptop? Do you wear shoes, clothing? Do you buy anything at a supermarket?

    If you can answer "No" to all those, then you're okay to boycott Chinese goods.

  85. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by twostix · · Score: 0

    Why would they do that? Produce "IP" I mean.

    The real wealth and power in the world is being the worlds manufacturing base, just like the US once was.

    Now China is, after been *given* that enormous power base by the short sighted and increasingly decadent and bankrupt west are very close to being the worlds new powerhouse. And while people in the west will whinge and moan about China not respecting the wests mass delusion of "IP" laws, China will continue laughing all the way to the bank producing physical goods from nuts and bolts to electronics to massive and complex machines and tools of industry, an income stream and power base that can't be taken without mass violence. Unlike "IP". And given that there's a billion of them to protect their factories and industry...good luck with that anyway.

    So the west will just have to suck it up now wont they? If people in the west want things, physical things like cars and computers and fridges and TVs and most of the tools and parts for the tiny industry that they do have left, they're going to have to play by Chinas rules. Just like everyone else has had to play by the US's rules for the last 100 years, and just like the US, whatever China wants to do, China does.

    Not quite there yet, but in 10 years that will be the state of the world.

    At least for 20-30 years that it would take to rebuild the manufacturing base in the west if the desire ever took hold again. Which is somewhat doubtful for the current generations, given it was them who gave away the manufacturing base to start with.

    I won't even go into the irony of Americans bitching about the upstart country gaining dominance by making use of the old countrys "IP". The parallels to history are uncanny. Problem is this time, the new powerhouse isn't even pretending that it's going to try the whole individual sovereignty over state thing. In fact many in power in China see that as one of the wests weaknesses and something that holds the west back.

    Fascism (to call a spade a spade) is an excellent economic and governance model for production, making money and getting a country to become an industrial powerhouse. That is, if you can keep the lowest citizens in line. Which as we've seen time and time again, China can - hell western business even helps them.

  86. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by byolinux · · Score: 1

    And the gift cards are good for more than just music...

  87. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    Tracking the cards before redemption is different than tracking redeemed cards. If they track everything before shipping it out, then they have to manage one massive database for every card. Add in a second database to manage everything that's been redeemed and then make the two have to sync with each other... headaches. On the other hand, having a secret password of sorts embedded in the code and only having to verify that means you can eliminate the first database.

    In security terms, yes. It is more secure to have a list of authorized numbers. It is less work to have have a "secret knock" as it were and just make sure that matches. It's like having an exclusive club where one can get in by saying "Macman sent me" versus having you make a list of everybody that can get in. The first is better for larger groups but allows for some fraud, the second is better for small groups when you can spare the time to verify.

    And honestly? Those cards aren't worth anything as is. I'm guessing there's some sort of business tax advantage to having it that way. Anybody familiar with that?

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  88. Re: freebie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is in contrast to when someone messes up but it is actually addressed to you, such as a retailer sending you extra items accidentally, or when they send you "promotional" items that want you to agree to shrink wrap licenses to open them.

    At least in California, if it is shipped to you (shipped as in to your name + address) it is your property.

  89. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by steelfood · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't happen. It'd cost more to manufacture elsewhere. Said copies would still have to be made in China.

    And you wonder why China isn't terribly interested in the whole "intellectual property" idea.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  90. I bought a card that was "not activated" by lindseyp · · Score: 1

    I bought a UK gift card off e-bay to use with my UK itunes account. it sold at a discount to value, but not a massive discount.

    I got the seller just to send me photos of the card, and tried to credit my account, and it said "card has not been activated". So it seems that in the UK, at least, there is a system whereby retailers "activate" individual serial numbers at the point of sale, and unless this takes place they are not accepted.

    Having said that, I bought a U.S. one which worked, and was actually sold at a premium (I imagine lots of foreign buyers wanting cheap dollar-based prices). I hate to think that was fake, I never even saw the card.

    Apple has gift-card by e-mail as a service, too. If you've received a number like this and used it in good faith who to sue? By the time you enter it, you cold be 5 links away from the scamming perpetrators.

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    1. Re:I bought a card that was "not activated" by tacarat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that there are corrupt retailers that'll activate counterfeit cards for a nominal fee too.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  91. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Webster, of Webster's Dictionary fame, was instrumental in getting US copyright law passed federally.

  92. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    If they track everything before shipping it out, then they have to manage one massive database for every card. Add in a second database to manage everything that's been redeemed and then make the two have to sync with each other... headaches.

    And yet that's how every other gift card works! Apple thought they could get away with cutting corners. Now they're seeing why everyone else doesn't.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  93. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

    I think my uncle said something like that when a Chinese inventor came up with the same thing he'd already patented years before. I'm not sure it would have been any different if my uncle had the idea after the other guy.

  94. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    Are you sure every other gift card works like that? It might just be that "I want Steve Jobs to have my baby" wasn't the best passphrase to secure the encryption.

    (I'd like to see your proof on this, even if just for the sake of curiosity.)

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  95. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by nametaken · · Score: 1

    "You can't identify the illegitimate cards. Each individual card isn't kept track of."

    Why not?

  96. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by mgblst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except that I am sure Apple has to hand over a certain amount of money to the record labels. So a $200 card, they may have to hand over $180, and they get nothing from the consumer.

    So actually something is being stolen, from Apple to the Music companies. They don't miss out, they would be loving this. All of a sudden, they are getting millions from Apple due to China.

  97. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by bitrex · · Score: 1

    While I, as you, am preparing to welcome my new Chinese overlords, there is one area of weakness in China's global domination plan you may not considered in your post:

    China's arable land barely above critical minimum
    Shrinking Arable Lands Jeopardizing China's Food Security
    China not to Sacrifice Arable Land for Infrastructure Construction

  98. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, chinaman is NOT the prefered nomenclature.

  99. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Well,

    Thanks very much for those links, they're really, really useful! Full of technical detail on the algorithm used.

    Well, honey, I was talking about the fact that these guys had no idea how the cards were used. Do you believe they could handle an actual algorithm?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  100. Used free music card... by mcarmstrong14 · · Score: 1

    I picked up a free iTunes/Nike workout mix card from Best Buy a few weeks ago. When I entered the code, I received a message stating that the code I was trying to use was already used. Most likely someone wrote down the number on my card but I guess it is possible that the number was cracked.

  101. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Well,

    Thanks very much for those links, they're really, really useful! Full of technical detail on the algorithm used.

    For instance, check out these facts in the article Lars T linked to:

    * Apple Gift Cards can be purchased from the Apple Online Store in any amount between $25-$2500

    Case in point - you can't tell the difference between Apple Gift Cards and iTunes Gift Cards - and you want the algorithm? I have the feeling you'd be stumped if it said "add 1" and would try a way to add l.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  102. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Yes, just imagine a bunch of companies, freely competing with each other to drive prices down and serve consumers better. I'm glad we don't do that here in the capitalist West. Wait, wat?

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  103. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, honey, I was talking about the fact that these guys had no idea how the cards were used.

    Next time, you might want to consider replying to one of the people you think was wrong, specifically telling them why they were wrong.

    You got the balls to link to one?

  104. Roman Law by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

    In UK law, at least, which is what 90% of the world base their law systems on:

    No it's not, most of the world's law systems are based on Roman Law, as established by emperor Justinian in the 6th century. Only a few of the world's law systems are based on anglo-saxon style common law (essentially the former British colonies), and anyways all of them owe a big debt to the romans.

  105. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by squoozer · · Score: 1

    I'm sure your explanation of how these cards works is correct but I can't help wondering why they don't / can't use private key encryption? Apple are the only people that need to read what is on the card so if each card carried some unique information (e.g. a GUID, a time stamp, value, distributor sold to) encrypted with a key they kept secret it would be damn near impossible to counterfeit. The end user would simply send the encrypted information back to Apple when they wanted to use the card and it would be marked off the list of available card.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  106. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, I could imagine the record companies to have a good case against Apple ... because they left the door right open if this is true.

  107. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and noone seems to detect the sarcasm.... If you're handing out gift cards, you're handing out money. You'd better be sure it can't be duplicated. Either apple have built an algorithm that is simple to guess, or the activation checks were done client side and someone stepped through the code.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  108. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by jcr · · Score: 1

    China will continue laughing all the way to the bank producing physical goods from nuts and bolts to electronics to massive and complex machines and tools of industry, an income stream and power base that can't be taken without mass violence.

    What utter nonsense. It doesn't take any violence to build a factory in the USA, and when we abandon the asinine tax incentives for sending work offshore, we'll increase domestic manufacturing again. There's still quite a lot of manufacturing going on here, as it happens.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  109. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    Instead of having 2 databases you could also simply have 1 with 1 bit of mutable data per key.

    Passkey hash + 1 bit times a billion, 400 bucks worth of memory. System capable of performing radix searches to match the hash to the correct entry millions of times per second, 4000 bucks. Avoiding a headache from having to spend 2 minutes not being an idiot ... priceless

    If this kind of stuff gives you a headache then you should not be a programmer working on a system which pushes through more than a billion dollars worth of revenue a year!

  110. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I think they are. Think of it like this. Each card key is basically an encrypted signature by Apple saying that somebody bought a card worth however much money. Somebody figured out Apple's private key and now is forging signatures so as to defraud the iTunes store. Sure, Apple can revoke the signature (and is probably doing so on the replacement generation of iTunes gift cards), but the problem is they can't invalidate the faked cards as it would cause all the legitimate, paid for, cards to be invalidated as well. One thing I didn't see in the article is if this problem is only in China or applies to other regions as well.

    I'm guessing that the key was obtained by simple bribery or theft rather than actual computer skills. Somebody where the cards are printed probably got copies of the important files and sold the data to counterfeiters. I'm sure ask.slashdot.cn had a thread about the best place to sell such information was :P

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  111. Hmmmmm..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    For every dollar lost, Steve Jobs cries one, single tear.

    Somebody get him a couple pallets of Kleenex, 'cause I'm sure not going to.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  112. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orientals are great at putting a new slant on things.

  113. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Xest · · Score: 1

    "I guess it will forever remain a mystery to them why their nation isn't home to prosperous software & music industries while the status quo is free for the taking with no repurcussions."

    I guess you missed the whole outsourcing thing that has been affecting the software industry in America and the West for the last decade or so then as companies move all their development jobs overseas to China/India which has allowed these two countries economy's to grow at an astounding rate?

    It's not like Chinese music isn't popular and profitable in China either, sure it's not exported much but when you have 1.3billion or whatever people as a customer base, expanding it isn't too big a worry.

    Saying China doesn't have a prosperous software industry is a bit odd in the face of it being one of the major drivers of their economy's growth. Saying they don't have a prosperous music industry is a little odd too.

    I suppose it's the same thing as that there are more Chinese internet users than any other nation- we just don't see them because they have their own products, their own groups and so on, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

  114. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, I could imagine the record companies to have a good case against Apple

    The record companies aren't even involved. Apple pays them the relevant royalties for each track sold; the fact that the tracks were bought with fake gift cards is irrelevant.

    It's no different to the situation where someone uses forged currency to buy a physical CD; the shop loses out, the wholesaler/record company etc. still get paid.

  115. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Why don't you read the replies? Just search for "activate" or "number comes up".

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  116. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC: You got the balls to link to one?

    LT: Why don't you read the replies?

    Clearly, you don't have the balls.

  117. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by jimbob666 · · Score: 1

    Ha! Try making a buck off my IP: 192.168.0.1

  118. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by twostix · · Score: 1

    No it takes capital and the *want* and *desire* to. And I think it's more the dollar an hour wages and virtual slave labour that entice companies to China rather than tax incentives.

    Why would anybody ever invest huge amounts of money to build a factory in the USA or the UK or France, when there is state sanctioned slave labour across the other side of the worldand western governments are happy to allow it? Or have you been asleep for the past 30 years as the people who have the ability to build factories in the west have shut them down and moved them to...China.

    My point which you seem to have completely missed, is that IP can't be controlled by physical force. If your countries main industry is the production of ideas and entertainment - "IP" then China can take the product of that industry and sell it or make use of it for free, and there's *nothing* you can physically do to stop that. Or to put it another way, China can pillage your industry at will without shedding a drop of blood. On the other hand your country can't just magic up a thousand factories and start mass producing a million types of widgets and items that are required for any modern country to function. And if you want to pillage Chinas (as they can do to yours at will), you'll have to shed a fair bit of blood first.

  119. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by osolemirnix · · Score: 1

    "And it is overall not a pretty picture." Why not, they are prospering pretty well overall - don't you think? I agree that to the inventors of IP it's a hassle, but the argument that patents in it's current form are a benefit from an overall systemic point of view has yet to be provided. Imho it would probably be more effective overall if we had no IP protection at all. The argument that no-one would take the financial risk to innovate does not hold - if I look at the local Chinese market where someone steals a jewellery design it kind of seems a proven point to me.

    --

    Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
  120. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we all know the answer is 43

  121. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the lottery makes way more money than Apple does, even after paying out a prize. Remember, for every ticket that wins even a paltry $5, think of how much money is spent on losing tickets.

    In fact, Apple grosses substantially more than the one lottery I checked on, the Mass Lottery grossed only 4.4 billion in FY2005. Apple, on the other hand, grossed $5.4 billion in the 3rd quarter of 2005.

    You mentioned "someone brought up cost effectiveness" and I'd believe that. It just seems strange that the iTunes system is so easy to beat, especially when one considers who is operating it.

    I guess the engineers got left out when this was being developed.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  122. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    The US patent system with its patents on business models and software is botched, but that is not the whole world. The idea and original implementation of patents is pretty good.

    There is at the moment at least relative little innovation in China. It is a very small amount of money that gets invested in research and design. The West invests much more, as % of turnover/profits.

    Furthermore the Chinese industry is not in a very good shape. Most of them are plain workshops doing assembly, and thus easily replaced by other companies. They don't have much if anything that makes a factory stand out, they don't have many own products. Mostly the design is done overseas, and the assembly in China. And workshops are of course easily replaceable by another.

  123. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know how it works in the US but certainly in the UK iTunes gift cards are activated at the checkout to prevent shoplifting.

  124. wake up call for itunes? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This could be what itunes needs, trying to compete with torrents, wake up, i guess some people are still using vhs and others 8 track for nostalgic effect, but i swear those that do not get with the program will be left behind, even Metallica ended up finally bending over for torrent industry.
    Lars even downloaded his own album!

  125. iTunes by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    That's something I will never install on my computer, even if it gave out free music I rather download my music from reputable and accountable sources.

  126. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by kai6novice · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, but even thou American products can be easily recreated at no cost, but the American product quality is hardly recreated by the Chinese. I haven't seen any Chinese product that has the same quality as the old American products. I think American should open their factories again and compete with Chinese factories. Even the product might costs a little more, but MADE IN USA still give people the impression of higher quality product. And I *LOVE* MADE IN USA high quality product!

  127. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    I think that bribes or outright theft were more likely involved than any particular technical skills. I'm guessing iTunes has it's own online store hosted in China, yes? Or at least the card presses are there, so that means the key for that region is stored on the computer involved with the printing.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  128. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by reashlin · · Score: 1

    The Chinaman is not stealing anything from apple. Apple are freely handing their money away without managing the appropriate checks at their end.

  129. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd be a pretty nice deal except "serving consumers" is not what their goals are.

  130. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I'd always guessed this was the case in the US too, as every other gift card I've ever purchased has had to be activated prior to use...

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  131. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samuel Langhorne Clemens, "Mark Twain", was born in Florida, Missouri on November 30, 1835 to a Tennessee country merchant, John Marshall Clemens (August 11, 1798 â" March 24, 1847), and Jane Lampton Clemens (June 18, 1803 â" October 27, 1890).

    Twain was born in a Missouri 12 years after statehood to american citizens. How was he not a citizen?

  132. Re:Random thought by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    Actually that is still useful, I think.

    On a flight there were TVs in the seats where they charge like $15 to use it. So I took out a gift card I had that had about $0.15 on it and swiped it. The TV started right up, it can't process those transactions while its in the air.

  133. Re:Random thought by PIBM · · Score: 1

    They still could charge you back for the missing amount of money since they know who was seated where... It's still unprobable they will do, though.

  134. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  135. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samuel Langhorne Clemens, "Mark Twain", was born in Florida, Missouri on November 30, 1835 to a Tennessee country merchant, John Marshall Clemens (August 11, 1798 Ã" March 24, 1847), and Jane Lampton Clemens (June 18, 1803 Ã" October 27, 1890).

    Twain was born in a Missouri 12 years after statehood to american citizens. How was he not a citizen?

  136. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    We've shipped most of our jobs making actual products overseas.

    Like that one company that comes to mind. The one that brings us MacBooks, iMacs, iPods.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  137. Re:Random thought by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    I was actually a bit worried about that for a while, next time I'll just move to a different seat.

  138. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically it would be in the interests of music companies to crack the iTunes gift cards. Since they will make more money this way.

  139. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Stratocastr · · Score: 1

    the bandwidth in China and India and most 3rd world countries is 1/1000 of what we get here in the US. (think downloads at 8kbps)

    If that gets fixed someway somehow, its game over

    --
    Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
  140. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by ultranova · · Score: 1

    Because they don't create cards on the fly through electronic terminals. They are sold from the shelve of Apple stores, grocery stores, corner stores.... They are pre-printed and usable without activation. There is no way to follow a card.

    Maybe they could, gee, I dunno, generate a random number or string, store it into the iTunes database, and then print a card to match?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  141. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by suffe · · Score: 1

    How does anyone know Apple doesn't do it the other way arround? Pay 70% of the sales of gift-cards? Doing this, they would completely get arround the problem you describe. This way, the downloading and use of the card would simply be an accounting change on the apple servers.

    Sure, they would not get the money they would get if you actually payed for the stuff in the first place, but there won't be the real currency transfer error that you describe.

    The only reason I could see for Apple not doing this is that they get free interest on the money people pay for the card before they actually use them. I guess it's left as an exercise to the reader, or the people running Apple, to actually figure out which one is the better move.

    --

    Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
  142. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better cause: bankrupt Apple!

  143. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by jcr · · Score: 1

    No it takes capital and the *want* and *desire* to

    Of course.

    I think it's more the dollar an hour wages and virtual slave labour that entice companies to China rather than tax incentives.

    You're leaving out the relative productivity difference between the USA and China. Lower wages aren't as much of a draw as you think they are; the USA still has some of the highest productivity anywhere. That's one of the reasons why it makes sense for Toyota to have plants here instead of building all their cars in China and shipping them over.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  144. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by mgblst · · Score: 1

    What an idiotic way to look at it? So you don't believe in fraud then?

  145. Anyone from Slashdot contact Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great free advertising for the thieves guys...

    Much more likley these cards are purchased with stolen CC's. See forums on ebay as well as toucharcade, this
    has been going on for months.

    The shelves are full of these cards, all useless until the get authorized, so unless the hackers have hacked the auth system it's very likley these are stolen. When Apple figures it out, they'll disable your iTunes account. (see TA post for example)

    Also, you've given personal info and/or CC info to a site that is likley using stolen CC's, seems like a perpetual money mahcine for the theives. you guys know how to sing the "free credit reports.com song?" hoe so.

    Best of luck

    Rich

  146. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    Go to any place (grocery store, convenience store, etc.) that sells gift cards or phone cards. Read the packaging on the cards and notice that it says the cards have no value until they're activated at the register. Now buy one of the cards and watch the register activate it; you'll probably see a serial number or such on your receipt. If you're feeling lucky, try stealing one of the cards and then using it; you'll find that it has no value.

    This system is meant to protect against shoplifting: there's no point in stealing cards that can't be used. It also has the side effect of preventing people from generating their own gift card numbers.

    (You can still attack the system by writing down a bunch of card numbers from the rack and waiting a few days/weeks for someone else to buy them. But you have to use the cards in the window between the time they're activated and the time they're used up.)

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  147. BT by enjahova · · Score: 1

    BitTorrent is very popular in China. Many young people use it to get music, movies and TV shows, both American and Chinese.
    They call it BT.

    --
    "how can they call it a MINE if everything here is THEIRS?!?!" -Straight Jacket
  148. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    The serial number is the checksum used for validation. It's not "live" until it's paid for. Then it gets added to the database rather than being in the database and marked payed for. That's why the Apple cards could be forged. They basically don't know the card number exists until activation. As long as it meets the cryptographic standard set out by the vendor it's fine. If it was a strictly a basis of make one, sell one, then a key generator would be of limited use as it'd be too easy to get numbers that weren't usable. The cards weren't made yet. The approach you give will work, but is distinctly different than what the article outlines.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  149. Re:Wow! What useful links - full of technical deta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Case in point - you can't tell the difference between Apple Gift Cards and iTunes Gift Cards

    I was just listing the interesting & informative facts in the article you linked to.

    If you've got problems with the articles you linked to, then why did you link to them?

  150. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    That's why the Apple cards could be forged. They basically don't know the card number exists until activation.

    Yes, exactly, assuming that by "activation" you mean redemption.

    That's the flaw in their plan. When you give them a gift card number, they don't bother to ask "does this number actually belong to a real gift card that we manufactured and sold", they only ask "does the algorithm say this number is valid". Once the algorithm stops being a secret, the system falls apart.

    It's not much of a hassle to "manage one massive database for every card". Even if we generously posit that they need to track 1 billion cards, storing 100 bytes of data for each one, that's still only ~100 GB: the storage cost is trivial, and a billion-row database hardly makes Oracle flinch. There's no reason that every gift card vendor shouldn't be tracking the numbers of the cards they manufacture, and any who don't are begging to get burned the same way Apple is.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  151. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by tacarat · · Score: 1

    I brought up this topic with some friends and one of them has used software to this effect. It seems to support the pre-inventoried idea in that the keys you get give random quantities of items or amounts. Assuming the key generator in the article is the same, then yes, you've been right (thanks for the conversation. Fun). This fact doesn't really change the fact that theft can occur, but does dramatically increase the possibility that you can buy a pre-used card.

    As a consumer I'd rather have Apple take the loss than me. I can't imagine how you could try getting your money back without getting rolling eyes and a canned "no refunds" speech.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  152. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in the by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Well I'll give you the US model: rip-off IP like mad while you are developing and then when you have something you want to protect force the world to adopt draconian laws to your benefit.

    Don't see how anyone in the US can whine about this when they pioneered that development model.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  153. Re:And You Wonder Why Amazon MP3 Only Works in th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or on the opposite hand you can see what happens when copyrights don't exist. Just look at how Chinese inventions changed the world. It'd be a sad state had copyright existed back then. You wouldn't even be able to talk about this problem.

    What's needed is a better balancing system.