Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 RCs Shut Down To Force Updates

nk497 writes "The release candidate for Microsoft Windows 7 will expire June 2010, and the software giant will let users know they need to pay to upgrade by shutting down the system every two hours for three months. According to Microsoft: "The RC will expire on June 1, 2010. Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours. Windows will notify you two weeks before the bi-hourly shutdowns start. To avoid interruption, you'll need to install a non-expired version of Windows before March 1, 2010. You'll also need to install the programs and data that you want to use.""

414 comments

  1. Crackfix please by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long until someone crackfixes this? TIA.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    1. Re:Crackfix please by inerlogic · · Score: 3, Informative

      about 4 seconds...
      3... 2... 1....

    2. Re:Crackfix please by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      about 4 seconds... 3... 2... 1....

      Hurry! It's shutting me down!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    3. Re:Crackfix please by Tiger4 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How long before MS patchfixes this? They don't need more reasons for people to hate them, drive down sales, or drive developers to other OSs.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    4. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who wants to use the RC version of Windows 7 forever? The RTM version will be released and cracked long before March 2010.

    5. Re:Crackfix please by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Providing a (free as in beer) RC version that works, uncrippled, until mid 2010, would drive down sales.

      Hence the crippling.

    6. Re:Crackfix please by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would people hate Microsoft for making available a free release candidate of their new OS that can be used with no restriction for the next 11 months?

      At that point users of the release candidate can either pay for a license or reinstall their old OS.

      This isn't some nefarious move by Microsoft it is just the end of the evaluation period of the release candidate.

    7. Re:Crackfix please by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hope that's all it does!

      When I installed Vista on a used laptop it didn't recognize the Vista CD Key on the laptop and wouldn't let me log in to the system. Only thing it would display is "YOUR KEY IS INVALID. PLEASE ENTER A VALID KEY OR CALL... (etc)". Safe mode didn't work either.

      I ended up calling the manufacture and paying $30 for restore DVDs, but it put the laptop completely out of commission for a week.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    8. Re:Crackfix please by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      How long until someone crackfixes this?

      You mean, when will a third party patch be released to fix this behavior?

    9. Re:Crackfix please by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many "data files" will it make that are Windows 7 only, making return to XP impossible?

      Makes no difference I suppose. It's pretty much a given that anybody who installs this and uses it for a year is a die-hard Windows fan who's not going back anyway.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:Crackfix please by Xaoswolf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't know how many game demos that I've downloaded and played that have time limits on play.

      Generally, I find it frustrating that I can't save and have to stop at the good part, but if the game is good, I then buy it.

    11. Re:Crackfix please by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not "free as in beer." It's "free as in drugs" as in "the first hit is always free."

    12. Re:Crackfix please by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you just apply the new license or do you need to reinstall?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    13. Re:Crackfix please by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Not long. the beta had cracks that disabled the timeout floating on TPB for a month now. This one will be dead in short order as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Crackfix please by Taagehornet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would people hate Microsoft for making available a free release candidate of their new OS that can be used with no restriction for the next 11 months?

      You really must be new around here... ;-)

    15. Re:Crackfix please by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I installed Vista on a used laptop it didn't recognize the Vista CD Key on the laptop and wouldn't let me log in to the system. Only thing it would display is "YOUR KEY IS INVALID. PLEASE ENTER A VALID KEY OR CALL... (etc)". Safe mode didn't work either.

      First thought that came to mind is that you might've been using a Retail disk for an OEM install. While I've seen OEM disks from different PC makers work on other brands, I've yet to see a Retail version work with an OEM serial number.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    16. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would people hate Microsoft for making available a not free release candidate of their new OS that can be used with no restriction for the next 11 months?

      Yes because we should never judge a company by their actions in the past. We shouldn't judge them for releasing a bloat of an operating system with so much
      DRM embedded that MS & the media companies almost have more control of your hardware than you do.

      At that point users of the release candidate should reinstall an OS Fixed that for you.

      Microsoft is advising people not to keep using the RC but to use a fresh install of the final Win7.

      When Windows 7 RC expires, XP will not be supported by Microsoft any more giving most users a choice of Vista or Windows 7 or moving away from Microsoft.

      This isn't some nefarious move by Microsoft it is just the end of the evaluation period of the release candidate.

      Microsoft is in business to make as much money as possible. They do this by breaking the law and abusing the monopolistic hold they have on the OS market.
      It most certainly IS some nefarious move by Microsoft orchestrated to increase their profits. To think otherwise is naive.

    17. Re:Crackfix please by Cowmonaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's an RC. If you were fool enough to install Windows 7 and use it at a production level then you get what is coming. If you installed it at home and you only had one box you should of known from the start that something like this would happen. People who think like your comment suggests are a big problem in today's society. It represents yet again that some people want things to be provided to them for free exactly how they want it and damn anyone who does otherwise.

    18. Re:Crackfix please by unlametheweak · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not "free as in beer." It's "free as in drugs" as in "the first hit is always free."

      Yeah it's the same with sex, and then you get married.

    19. Re:Crackfix please by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm just excited to hear that Microsoft is giving out free copies of their OS so that people who write malware won't have to buy a copy to port their software to the new platform.

    20. Re:Crackfix please by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've had to call MS before since a client reloaded XP by himself and couldn't get past the key part. Was very simple - just had to verify with the person on the other end that the key wasn't in use more than once, then they activated it (challenge/response I think in XP) - this could have worked for you as well. Probably only 20 minutes out of my day (and billable...)

      --
      Karnal
    21. Re:Crackfix please by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good question. Some MS products let you change the license number, if you first enter an invalid one (like Server 2008; presumably that feature disappears after it's activated.) So it's definitely technically possible for them to do it.

      I doubt they will, though-- remember you're supposed to only be installing this Windows 7 release on *test* machines, not live machines. Therefore, you should fully expect to have to lose everything on it when you upgrade to the release version of Windows 7. It would be nice if Microsoft let you switch over without re-installing, but they really have no reason to. (And nor should you expect it.)

    22. Re:Crackfix please by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Beer is a drug. And beer, like other drugs, are often shared freely by friends. "Pushers" looking to get you hooked are a fabrication by the drug warriors.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:Crackfix please by jim_v2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >How many "data files" will it make that are Windows 7 only, making return to XP impossible? None.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    24. Re:Crackfix please by AlexBeck · · Score: 0

      Oh, I thought Windows was always free. Whatever..

    25. Re:Crackfix please by bonch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I love how open Slashdotters are about their piracy. Nobody even tries to be subtle about it anymore.

    26. Re:Crackfix please by Murpster · · Score: 1

      Already done, it's called "Linux"...

    27. Re:Crackfix please by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Piracy is nothing more than selfish humans leeching other people's work and not wanting to lose the free ride.

      Modern copyright law is nothing more than selfish and greedy middlemen not wanting to lose their free ride.

    28. Re:Crackfix please by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it's a silly restriction for game demos if you can't save. It's reasonable that you can't load (after all, it's a demo), but is there any reason why you shouldn't be allowed to continue a game on the full version after you started it on the demo version?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    29. Re:Crackfix please by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is slashdot. MS can NEVER be seen as anything but evil here.

    30. Re:Crackfix please by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      For me the issue seems to rather be that Microsoft are getting a number of people to beta test their software, and the least they could do is give them a free copy of the end result.

    31. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations iamhassi!

      You're a PC.

    32. Re:Crackfix please by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is /. dude.
      MS is shit.
      MS is insecure.
      Year of the Linux Desktop!
      FUCK OFF, PUPPY, GOOGLE IS MY BEST FRIEND NOW.

    33. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "free as in beer." It's "free as in drugs" as in "the first hit is always free."

      Um, my dealer has never given me free weed...

    34. Re:Crackfix please by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the RC1 does work, fully uncrippled, until March of 2010.

      Geez. Microsoft releases a release candidate of their next major OS and lets everyone on earth use it for free for 10 months..... and people still complain because it begins to nag the user after 10 months.

      Only on Slashdot.

    35. Re:Crackfix please by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod parent up =) I appears he has experience in the trenches

    36. Re:Crackfix please by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 0, Troll

      Piracy is nothing more than selfish humans leeching other people's work and not wanting to lose the free ride.

      Modern copyright law is nothing more than selfish and greedy middlemen not wanting to lose their free ride.

      And apparently, "paying for goods and services rendered" is an outdated way of consuming.

    37. Re:Crackfix please by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Pushers" looking to get you hooked are a fabrication by the drug warriors

      Yes and no.

      Free, or discount-rate, samples are a useful marketing tool for drug dealers as well as other "legitimate" businesses. Since so many of the drugs in question are addictive, there is an element of truth to pushers 'getting people hooked'.

      It's not a myth created by the "drug warriors".

      Not all drug dealers fit into this stereotype, but some definitely do. It's a business; identifying your potential markets, increasing the size of those markets, and increasing your penetration into those markets are all things done by successful dealers, although they may not refer to them in those terms. Another important strategy is steering customers to your highest-margin products; this is even better when they are adding those products on top of existing products, instead of replacing the other products. "Pushing" drugs and offering free samples are a great way to do all of these things.

      If you haven't personally experienced these things, well, that's probably a measure of your exposure. Or it's a measure of how mature the market is where you are; a mature market doesn't require as much development.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    38. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the same thing when working on a family members computer and on Christmas Day no less. Took only about 5 minutes and was surprisingly painless.

    39. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there, crackfix is provided. side effect is a little trojan bundled with it. but we can all live with that, don't we?

    40. Re:Crackfix please by Khyber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Why would people hate Microsoft for making available a free release candidate of their new OS that can be used with no restriction for the next 11 months?"

      Because while Microsoft has every right to disable their software, they have NO LEGAL RIGHT to turn my computer on or off. That is *MY* hardware. You turn it off without my permission and I will have you in court for unlawful trespass, unauthorized computer access, unauthorized use of property, and a whole slew of other Federal charges.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    41. Re:Crackfix please by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      It appears he has experience in the trenches.

      I'm sure there's an anatomical comment in there, but I'm not gonna go there...

      Actually, after escaping from ten years of purgatory, I guess I already did. ;)

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    42. Re:Crackfix please by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's their software. When you installed it, you agreed to their licensing terms.

      You don't like the terms, don't install the software.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    43. Re:Crackfix please by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah it's the same with sex, and then you get married.

      What planet are you from?

      With sex, it's "pay out the nose for it one way or another", then you get married, and it becomes "not at any price except for purposes of procreation and then you better be able to perform on-demand at the whim of the Fertility Gods as intimated by the Basal Thermometer Oracle and meanwhile all you can think of is a crying infant and the fact that you wore tight jeans yesterday and whether you remembered to backup your systems and then you have to go see a urologist because of your 'performance issues'".

      Or so I've heard.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    44. Re:Crackfix please by TheSambassador · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are you talking about? Who doesn't reformat when they install a new OS? Maybe the general public, but they probably don't even know that the RC exists.

      Also... wanting to try the new mainstream OS makes me a diehard Windows fan?

    45. Re:Crackfix please by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      First thought that came to mind is that you might've been using a Retail disk for an OEM install. While I've seen OEM disks from different PC makers work on other brands, I've yet to see a Retail version work with an OEM serial number.

      Yeah, probably more dumb-ass Windows crap like that.

      Where I used to work my PC had a legitimate copy of XP, which was pre-SP1. Which meant that if I had to reinstall I couldn't just grab an SP2 CD from another PC, install it and type in the CD key, because -- horrors! -- it wasn't an SP2 key (or was it SP1 in those days, I forget). So Microsoft forced me to actually track down and install from a pre-SP1 XP CD, then install SP1 and SP2 on top, for no good reason whatsoever... in the time I worked for the company I probably wasted several days reinstalling as a result.

    46. Re:Crackfix please by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting to write a book, "Monogamy: A Cautionary Tale" ;)

    47. Re:Crackfix please by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I hope that's all it does!

      When I installed Vista on a used laptop it didn't recognize the Vista CD Key on the laptop and wouldn't let me log in to the system. Only thing it would display is "YOUR KEY IS INVALID. PLEASE ENTER A VALID KEY OR CALL... (etc)". Safe mode didn't work either.

      I ended up calling the manufacture and paying $30 for restore DVDs, but it put the laptop completely out of commission for a week.

      You don't need a valid key to boot. You can use Vista for 30 days before you need one. Maybe you were in a parallel universe?

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    48. Re:Crackfix please by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because while Microsoft has every right to disable their software, they have NO LEGAL RIGHT to turn my computer on or off.

      Except disabling their software results in your computer shutting off - you cant run your hardware without it. Of course they could change things to have the OS shut down and display that stupid 'it is now safe to turn off your hardware' message so you can leave your useless hardware powered on.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    49. Re:Crackfix please by Salem+Willow · · Score: 1

      don't they cripple the version they sell anyway? I don't remember seeing anything about Bill Gates' pc crashing randomly or failing miserably when they put unsupported drivers in...or blinding him with the "oh so glorious light" of the Blue Screen Of Death...

      --
      this is a virtual insanity that always seems to be governed by our love for this useless twisting of our new technology.
    50. Re:Crackfix please by TheSambassador · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When is this EVER the case with ANY beta test? People CHOOSE to beta test... they're not forced into it. Aside from that, the "payment" is usually the ability to get to try out new software before everyone else, and to help make sure that the issues YOU have with it are noticed.

      Not to mention that because this is an OPEN beta, Microsoft would have to give every single person who ever "beta-tested" (read: "downloaded") the software a free copy.

      If I get chosen for the Starcraft beta test, I'll not only be extremely excited, but I will most definitely buy the finished product.

    51. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, they introduced Crippy, your upgrade assistant?..

    52. Re:Crackfix please by RabidMoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "easy transfer tool" that they've included in the RC should take care of that handily. I used it when installing over XP. It's as simple as hooking up an appropriately capacious external drive, selecting the directories containing applications/data that you want migrated, and hitting "Go".

      Once the Win7 install is up and running, just run the "easy transfer tool", select the backup file that was created, and hit "Go" again. Worked very well.

    53. Re:Crackfix please by Beelzebud · · Score: 2

      "We shouldn't judge them for releasing a bloat of an operating system with so much DRM embedded that MS & the media companies almost have more control of your hardware than you do." What a bunch of BS.
      From ripping DVD's to audio CD's, Vista has prevented me from doing nothing. If you hvae legitimate problems with the OS, fine, but your statement there is just a bunch of FUD.

    54. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my wife hooked on oxy's so that she'd be a nicer person.. Maybe drug pushers are just desperate husbands sick of their marriage?

    55. Re:Crackfix please by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It probably also depends on the level of competition and barriers to entry in a given market. Giving crack to children produces future customers; but it costs money up front and it only helps if the customers go to you, rather than the guy down the street.

      In areas with high barriers to entry(such as the risk of getting shot by an established gang) or some tacit arrangement for sharing promotional costs("First Hit: Brought to you by the American Cocaine Council") I'd expect promotional spending to be higher than in areas with lower barriers to entry.

    56. Re:Crackfix please by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the problem? If it shuts down at predictable intervals, it's a big improvement...

      *ducks*

    57. Re:Crackfix please by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      To be fair, if it's one you can purchase online, they give you that option then so you can save. Otherwise, you normally don't get far enough to make saving nesscessary

    58. Re:Crackfix please by SirGeek · · Score: 1

      With sex, it's "pay out the nose for it one way or another", then you get married, and it becomes "not at any price except for purposes of procreation and then you better be able to perform on-demand at the whim of the Fertility Gods as intimated by the Basal Thermometer Oracle and meanwhile all you can think of is a crying infant and the fact that you wore tight jeans yesterday and whether you remembered to backup your systems and then you have to go see a urologist because of your 'performance issues'".

      If that's the case, then that's the wrong mate...

      Been Married almost 18 years, No Kids (by mutual choice) and we're actually happy.

    59. Re:Crackfix please by Beelzebud · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From reading this I can tell 100% that you never buy drugs on the black market. Those guys are out to make a quick buck. They don't need to give people a free sample, they aren't selling Avon.

      Drugs sell themselves, you don't need to have a market strategy to sell crack.

    60. Re:Crackfix please by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Do you just apply the new license or do you need to reinstall?

      Well, judging that this is a release candidate, and you will need to buy the final release, you have to reinstall.

    61. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how an operating system works, do you?

    62. Re:Crackfix please by nickfrommaryland · · Score: 1

      Because while Microsoft has every right to disable their software, they have NO LEGAL RIGHT to turn my computer on or off. That is *MY* hardware. You turn it off without my permission and I will have you in court for unlawful trespass, unauthorized computer access, unauthorized use of property, and a whole slew of other Federal charges.

      You'll be laughed out by the first judge to hear your case, too. If MS has decided to disable Windows 98 because they no longer support it, then MS would likely have been in breach of contract and paying out the nose. However, the RCs were distributed with clear notice that the software would only function for so many days and not intended for production use. You gain no superior right to Windows by installing it on your home hardware. In short, MS has every right to shutdown the RCs. If you don't like it, ask any /. reader to help you install a Linux distro.

    63. Re:Crackfix please by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      then you get married, and it becomes "not at any price except for purposes of procreation...
      ...Or so I've heard.


      Well, there is another side to that story: my wife and I are in our mid 40s. She was on the pill for most of the 25 years we have been together, and our sex life declined along the lines of the jar-of-beans statistic commonly mentioned.

      Since my wife stopped taking the pill (I guess gambling that if an unwanted pregnancy were to happen, there have already been multiple opportunities for such a mishap), the boot is now on the other foot (so to speak), the rampant horny hormones have taken hold, and I'm now the one who has to struggle to keep up.

      You young 'uns might think there are worse ways to go than being balled to death, but there are times when I am more then happy just to sit in an armchair reading a novel, thank you very much.

    64. Re:Crackfix please by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      First thought that came to mind...

      First thought that came to my mind is they should have gotten Ubuntu.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    65. Re:Crackfix please by PRMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just install Office 2000 and leave a copy of Word open. No Windows system can shut down then.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    66. Re:Crackfix please by ianare · · Score: 0

      That may be true for the street pusher (the equivalent of the corporate sales droid), but once you start moving up the supply chain you do see exactly this sort of thing happening. For example look at the problems facing Mexico right now where the cartels are battling it out for access and control of distribution channels to the US market. And in the US also, crime organizations fight for distribution monopolies of certain cities or neighborhoods (IOW markets), while looking to expand their areas of control.

    67. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt that the richest man in the world is going to have something with unsupported drivers. You expect him to have old, cheat, offbrand, etc hardware? You also expect him to complain that his 3 year old printer won't work with a new OS?

    68. Re:Crackfix please by bill_kress · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not disagreeing with you at all--but do you recognize that you are putting crack dealers on the same level as wineries? Many addictive drug dealers have used these techniques for years--The creators of cigarettes, wine and beer have often given their drugs away to try to create new addicts--in fact if I'm not mistaken, cigarettes were given to the military as part of rations WWII (and WWI?).

      Makes you think--I mean the cigarette manufactures are more aggressive in that way than dealers of every other drug (possibly even including alcohol) combined and they have killed many more people and cost society much more...

      I don't know where I'm going with this, but there is a point to be made there somewhere.

    69. Re:Crackfix please by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's funny is that somebody down-modded my post (It quickly went back up to 5 again). I'm assuming the down-modder was one of those happily married people that you hear about on TV.

    70. Re:Crackfix please by orev · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Vista has no such concept of OEM vs. Retail disks. All Vista discs are the same, and it will also be the same with W7. Some OEMs distribute modified disks that auto-install with a specific license key, but those can be easily modified to remove that behavior. Any Vista disc that prompts you to enter a key will work with an OEM or Retail license key.

    71. Re:Crackfix please by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Actually the current crack may work. I know that v1.0.1 of the Windows 7 activation crack by Orbit can activate the RC version, and AFAIK all of the beta builds continued to work past the timebomb date with that crack (or older versions of it - they only displayed "This copy of windows is not genuine" in a few places and the update functionality was disabled.)

      I'm going to try Windows 7 RC with that crack on my new gaming desktop, but I'll be sure to do a "future test" to make sure the timebomb isn't going to cause a problem (if anyone is going to try this test, be sure to disconnect the PC from the network first to prevent it from accessing SNTP servers).

      That box is going to be dual-booting Ubuntu, which will handle all my non-gaming-related stuff.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    72. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this particular case, either article is acceptable.

    73. Re:Crackfix please by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pssh, Microsoft takes backward compatibility very seriously. For instance, the virus on this disk I have in my USB floppy drive works ju

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    74. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would people hate Microsoft for making available a free release candidate of their new OS that can be used with no restriction for the next 11 months?

      See, the thing is we're all used to getting our operating systems free and with no restrictions. Just spoiled I guess...

    75. Re:Crackfix please by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Release Candidates are usually at least Gamma quality, not Beta.

      Besides, with Microsoft's history, the Beta usually works quite a bit better than the final release does... until at least SP1.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    76. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the life of me, why would anyone want to go back to XP? I loathed that OS version. Vista worked great for me and now RC7 so far seems to be even better. Not trolling here just trying to understand this XP fix that some have.

    77. Re:Crackfix please by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful
    78. Re:Crackfix please by Darlo888 · · Score: 1

      I agree, a free copy of 7 for 11 months and then having to pay seem fair to me.

    79. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't mind my asking, how long did it take for her libido to come back after she stopped taking the pill?

    80. Re:Crackfix please by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is in business to make as much money as possible. They do this by breaking the law and abusing the monopolistic hold they have on the OS market. It most certainly IS some nefarious move by Microsoft orchestrated to increase their profits. To think otherwise is naive.

      Sounds like they need the money. Microsoft borrowing money...who woulda thought?

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    81. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus the need for the crack fix.

    82. Re:Crackfix please by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Vista allows you to change CD Keys even after installing; it will unlock the edition features depending on the key (for example, if the original key was Business but you want Media Center too, you can acquire an Ultimate key and enter it using the computer properties window. After a reboot, you'll have all the Ultimate features, including Media Center, enabled.

      However, that's not really what this is about. The reason the above works is that all editions of Vista (except things like Enterprise) are binary-identical. An RC is not identical to the release version. If you have a release key, you obviously have a release version; from Microsoft's perspective you really should use that release version rather than the RC.

      What would surprise me is if they actually end up not letting you do an in-place upgrade from RC to RTM. Vista certainly permitted it during its own Beta-RC-RTM cycle, and it should be much easier than upgrading from one version to another (such as XP-Vista); it's really more like a service pack.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    83. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you are at and what substance your dealing with. Hell there are a lot of variables... Someone who isnt me has seen dealers give out free pills, less cut cocaine, a free hit or two of high quaility cocaine. If a dealer thinks you will be interested in a product they sometimes give or sell a sample at a discounted rate. If you are in the metro area and just driving up to a corner to find someone then yeah thats all about the quick buck. If you are dealing with middle or upper class people who are selling you will see much more of this, or if your dealer likes you. In general though, people arent going to just go around giving free stuff to someone who isnt there friend. Also yes, the uneducated kid peddling crack isnt going to be thinking long term

    84. Re:Crackfix please by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Free, or discount-rate, samples are a useful marketing tool for drug dealers as well as other "legitimate" businesses

      Never, in 15 years of buying and using drugs have I ever met a dealer who marketed. They don't need to, the demand is high enough that the customers will find you. Occasionally a sample is provided to prove the quality of the stock, but in no way does that lead to someone getting hooked.

      Since so many of the drugs in question are addictive, there is an element of truth to pushers 'getting people hooked'.

      Not really. No one gets hooked to anything after one free sample.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    85. Re:Crackfix please by NSIM · · Score: 1

      How many "data files" will it make that are Windows 7 only, making return to XP impossible?

      Unless you load new versions of applications along with Win7, there is no issue with incompatible data formats, except possibly with Windows Media Center recordings from Cable/OTA which I do believe have changed in Win7.

    86. Re:Crackfix please by greed · · Score: 1

      I've got an XP partition on a MacBook that's been through several drives, as they get Bigger Faster And Stronger. With the odd soft crash in there. (Unreadable until dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk0 sort of thing.)

      And now, everything I fart near the system configuration, I get to talk to Microsoft's computer and say yes, this key has only been used on this one computer, really, just this one computer, one, yes, one computer.

      Sure doesn't convince me I ever want anything from them ever again.

    87. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know why you got modded up for this, it's wrong. There certainly is a difference with OEM discs. They include a license certificate that matches the OEM BIOS. This is how they can install with no activation and a generic product key. It's also a popular way to pirate Vista, as it can't be blacklisted and will always validate as genuine.

    88. Re:Crackfix please by toetagger · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see it now. The New Mac vs. PC commercials.

      Hi, I'm a Mac. I automatically back myself up every 2 hours.

      Hi, I'm a PC. I reboot myself every 2 hours to give you the best performance that you deserve!

      Or another MS commercial:

      Windows 7 - The most stable Windows yet. Runs for 2 hours without shutting down! And to further your productivity, we've automated the shutdown to help you drive productivity and grow your business!

    89. Re:Crackfix please by Angostura · · Score: 1

      There are alternatives to the pill, such as the coil, you know. /Slightly worried that this appears under the existing topic subject line, but hey.

    90. Re:Crackfix please by Kagura · · Score: 1

      They have been running the beta in Japan since Office '97 ;)

    91. Re:Crackfix please by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe you should consider that your personal experience is not the sum of all human experience?

      Those guys are out to make a quick buck. They don't need to give people a free sample, they aren't selling Avon.

      You sure about that? Are you talking about retailers where they know the people will come to them? Perhaps you're unaware that those aren't the only kind of dealers around. Another question -- have you ever been in an area with an oversupply of drugs? It's amazing what an astute dealer will do to make sure he can move as much product as he chooses.

      Drugs sell themselves, you don't need to have a market strategy to sell crack.

      What if someone sells pot, but has a lot of shrooms or x to move that they got dirt cheap? And they have a bunch of pot customers who may be interested in the shrooms and x, but are a little timid about trying them?

      This is not uncommon on college campuses, where turnover of the market is constant (as students graduate or move on).

      I could get more into specifics, but this is not the place for discussion of personal experience along these lines, IMO.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    92. Re:Crackfix please by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      Their EULA can't supercede law, even if you knowingly agree to it.

      http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/1030_new.html

      (8) the term 'damage' means any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information;

      BY LAW THEY CANNOT DO IT AS PER THAT DEFINITION. They shouldn't even be allowed to design it like that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    93. Re:Crackfix please by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not into better living through chemistry, but I've seen exactly what you say never happens, happen.

      On top of that, you're trying to prove a negative through a personal anecdote.

      Seriously, good luck on this one.

    94. Re:Crackfix please by Kagura · · Score: 1

      How was this guy marked troll? It's an entirely reasonable comment. I thought the same exact thing when I read the GP.

    95. Re:Crackfix please by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind my asking, how long did it take for her libido to come back after she stopped taking the pill?

      I don't mind, but I'm not sure. I would guess about 3 months.

    96. Re:Crackfix please by trickyD1ck · · Score: 0

      MS is not a charity, if people are willing to pay for Windows, why give it away? If people are willing to test your software free of charge, why pay for it? Nah, this has been repeated here over and over, but some people seem not to be able to grasp the principle, by which the market and businesses operate. To do anything other than profit maximization ultimately leads to resource waste.

    97. Re:Crackfix please by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      I was exaggerating and joking, of course. Though there is a grain of truth in there somewhere...

      Well, there is another side to that story: my wife and I are in our mid 40s. She was on the pill for most of the 25 years we have been together, and our sex life declined along the lines of the jar-of-beans statistic commonly mentioned.

      Hormonally, most women are the horniest in their 40s anyway, IIRC from endocrine physiology oh-so-many-years-ago. Though the pill does also affect it greatly, since it regulates hormone levels.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    98. Re:Crackfix please by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Okay if it happens that say February 2010 rolls around and they don't have a release version ready i am sure that they will send a patch to extend the time limit as needed. and besides if you had read what microsoft wrote
      ON THE PAGE YOU HAD TO HAVE SEEN BEFORE YOU DID THE DOWNLOAD you would have seen

      "Here's what you need to know:

      This is pre-release software, so please read the following to get an idea of the risks and key things you need to know before you try the RC. [section clipped]
                  Watch the calendar. The RC will expire on June 1, 2010. Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours. Windows will notify you two weeks before the bi-hourly shutdowns start. To avoid interruption, you'll need to install a non-expired version of Windows before March 1, 2010. You'll also need to install the programs and data that you want to use. (Learn more about installing Windows.)
              *

                  Protect your PC and data. Be sure to back up your data and please don't test the RC on your primary home or business PC. "

      if you even try to make any kind of case of this you will lose FULL STOP END OF LINE END OF MESSAGE GOOD-BYE

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    99. Re:Crackfix please by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Except disabling their software results in your computer shutting off - you cant run your hardware without it.

      Of course you can: install another operating system.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    100. Re:Crackfix please by tiananmen+tank+man · · Score: 1

      hmmmm, what services do these middlemen provide. They provide marketing and distribution of information. Welcome to 2009, the internet has made distribution of information cost almost nothing.

    101. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were fool enough to install Windows [...] and use it at a production level then you get what is coming.

      There, fixed that for you. ;)

    102. Re:Crackfix please by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Marketing is more relevant than internet word-of-mouth. You don't know what you're talking about at all.

    103. Re:Crackfix please by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Of course you can: install another operating system.

      If all he wants to do is install another operating system, why be upset that the disabled OS powered off the computer?

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    104. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow

    105. Re:Crackfix please by Bio)-(azard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely.

      How is this different than any previous RC or Beta release? This is not news at all. In fact the title "Windows 7 RCs Shut Down To Force Updates" is very misleading. It does not force an update. Its forcing the user to either buy it or reinstall what they had previous.

      And for the love of god, why would anyone want a crack to run a beta version past its time limit anyway?

    106. Re:Crackfix please by rockout · · Score: 1

      Drugs sell themselves, you don't need to have a market strategy to sell crack.

      From reading this I can tell that not only have you never bought coke or heroin from a dealer, but that you also watch Chris Rock's comedy specials.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    107. Re:Crackfix please by qtzlctl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know, I know... you are joking. But it's actually true. Taking a break once in a while does increase your productivity. By ALOT.

      But I can see why it's an inconvenience, especially if you work on delicate tasks that require more than a few hours to complete. Of course the chances of a power user accepting to work with such, uhm, "feature", are slim to none. Truly by the time it expires, he will have already purchased/pirated the gold version and his productivity levels would be slumping back to what they used to be. *sigh*

    108. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ten or so years of drug use (including alcohol) the only thing that ever got "pushed" on me was cigarettes and that was by a friend. Now that is the ONLY thing I am addicted to; nope not any of the other drugs (many of which are those scary, addictive drugs alluded to by previous posters). Of all my friends, I don't know a single person that was "pushed" into trying anything other than cigarettes and never by a dealer. Please tell me where to locate these dealers that give out free drugs (not really!) as I would love to meet them one time.

    109. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? The first time you open notepad on Windows 7 it silently upgrades all your .txt files to the new MSTXT format. This not only uses a new standard for line endings (FF, ESC, BEL) but adds a layer of DRM ensuring your .txt files will be unreadable when the release candidate expires. And it uses wifi to update all your USB keys and external hard drives even when they aren't plugged in. MS are purest evil.

    110. Re:Crackfix please by thelastquestion · · Score: 1

      yeah? go shoot up some heroin once, see how you feel afterwards, and then come back and defend your last statement.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
    111. Re:Crackfix please by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      I'm not into better living through chemistry

      So you are not into modern medicine, eh?
      And you have never used tylenol, motrin, or nyquil?
      You will never use anti-depressants, boner-pills, creatine, vitamins or other medication?
      If you didn't answer nope to all of those, please retract your statement.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    112. Re:Crackfix please by Xest · · Score: 1

      shutdown -a

    113. Re:Crackfix please by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      "better living through chemistry" is a slang phrase where I live for the use of meth.

    114. Re:Crackfix please by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently it can hit the submit button and is very infecti

    115. Re:Crackfix please by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Most people don't enjoy their first experience with heroin. In fact, it makes them sick. Most people who try heroin don't become addicted. Nearly everyone who continues to use it does though.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    116. Re:Crackfix please by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      Sweet Jesus, I had better not install it on my Virtual PC who knows what it might do to me!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    117. Re:Crackfix please by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      If you slipstream your SP1 CD to SP-whatever the old key will still work with it.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    118. Re:Crackfix please by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      in fact i've often asked myself, do i want a computer that can only play non-drmed content or a computer that can play both drmed and non-drmed content? and i've realized that its good ms has put in all the drm. otherwise my shiny new bluray drive would be worthless.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    119. Re:Crackfix please by sopssa · · Score: 1

      Was this really an surprise to anyone? It even reads largely on the download page (you DID download it legally instead of torrents, right ;)

      Nevertheless its still an year to the future. And its a freaking release candidate.

    120. Re:Crackfix please by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      usually when wga non-genuine behavior is triggered it does not wait for apps, it forces them to close(like when the battery is low.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    121. Re:Crackfix please by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Um, my dealer has never given me free weed...

      Because he didn't need to -- you probably smoked pot before you met him (or bought from him anyway).

    122. Re:Crackfix please by hesiod · · Score: 1

      It will only append your virtual files with virtual characters, and use virtual WiFi to virtual-DRM virtually everything... virtual.

    123. Re:Crackfix please by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Because while Microsoft has every right to disable their software, they have NO LEGAL RIGHT to turn my computer on or off. That is *MY* hardware. You turn it off without my permission and I will have you in court for unlawful trespass, unauthorized computer access, unauthorized use of property, and a whole slew of other Federal charges.

      You did give permission. You said. "After 11 months I agree that Microsoft may turn off my comptuer every 2 hours while running windows 7."

      You just don't give permission each and every time it does it.

      Otherwise 90% of all software installers would be commiting a felony when they restart after installing. Also windows update if configured in a certain fashion would also be a felon.

      What do you want to fax them a signed agreement everytime you hit start -> shutdown?

    124. Re:Crackfix please by Ironballs · · Score: 0

      You must be new here

    125. Re:Crackfix please by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's funny is that somebody down-modded my post (It quickly went back up to 5 again). I'm assuming the down-modder was one of those happily married people that you hear about on TV.

      Or maybe it's just your wife...

    126. Re:Crackfix please by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Modern copyright law is nothing more than selfish and greedy middlemen not wanting to lose their free ride.

      I understand what are you getting at in general, but, in this particular case, how exactly is Microsoft a "middleman" when it comes to Windows?

    127. Re:Crackfix please by markass530 · · Score: 1

      I only 29 but I've been like that for a while, getting laid is fun and all, but lots of time I've done the one night thing, and either because of drunknesss, or tiredness, or both, I've decided to pass out instead, hey chances are she'll be there uin the morning anyways...

    128. Re:Crackfix please by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Crippy the gang-bangin' upgrade assistant says: "Best upgrade or I'll blast you bitch." Oh Crippy, what did we ever do without your charming street slang, prominent blue bandana and psychotically violent tendencies?

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    129. Re:Crackfix please by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      In some cases it may not be practical. For example, in Thief II, the mission you play on the demo is not the first one you play on the full game, also the mission in the demo is not identical to it's equivalent on the full game.

    130. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't make sense -- who's the middleman?

    131. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista doesn't have a differentiation from retail and oem disks unless if you count branding as a disk - a OEM key (eg the one on the bottom of your laptop) works just as well with a retail disk you get at Staples as the key that comes in the box. Or with anytime upgrade disks, its all good.

      On the other hand, HP hack disks which only have one version wont work well with everyone else.

      But retail and full oem disks are equivalent.

    132. Re:Crackfix please by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      The real question is whether or not an entire WOW guild can synchronize their shutdown times in order to actually complete a raid.

         

    133. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. just wow. you're a real jackass.

    134. Re:Crackfix please by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      ...and anyone with a brain realizes that. Don't let the pedants get you down.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    135. Re:Crackfix please by hitmark · · Score: 1

      The funniest thing is when a bios emulator and a bulk serial from HP can allow a install on just about any machine...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    136. Re:Crackfix please by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't judge them for releasing a bloat of an operating system with so much
      DRM embedded that MS & the media companies almost have more control of your hardware than you do.

      But they didn't, and they won't for at least another 11 months. And even then, they don't have control over your PC. You have to install it first, and then you need to remove any notion of installing anything else.

      Microsoft is in business to make as much money as possible. They do this by breaking the law and abusing the monopolistic hold they have on the OS market.
      It most certainly IS some nefarious move by Microsoft orchestrated to increase their profits. To think otherwise is naive.

      Since mking money is neither nefarious or illegal, how about you point out exactly what is illegal about releasing a release candidate for public testing? It might have been a monopoly issue if switching back to a different OS was difficult, but, as you said so yourself, they recommend that you reinstall their own OS, making the barrier for entry similar for not switching similar to switching.

      I agree with the sibling poster (who was modded troll). This is just FUD.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    137. Re:Crackfix please by gd23ka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Thousands of people are beta-testing crapware for months for free and all they get is the "free" use of it and not even that really thanks to the time limit. I'm sure some people at Microsoft are painfully aware how the lackluster of new Windows releases has worn off. Hmmmpf.. not even a free T-shirt, not even a "I beta-tested MSWindows for 10 months and all I got was this lousy T-shirt".

      Geez. Again someone telling me I should be thankful for nothing.

        Another day on slashdot.

    138. Re:Crackfix please by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody hates you for putting out a sign "Please paint my fence for free". I'm sure you'll find hundred thousands of people curious enough to install it for a quick glance at it, and maybe you're left with a few thousand world-wide that actually try to use it. Don't make it sound though as it's a great act of humanitarian charity received by a world of ingrates. As far as I'm concerned I need to be paid to look at it.

    139. Re:Crackfix please by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Well in theory there should be an update, bugfix, patch or something improved over the 14 month old RC by that point. So you're definitely getting some sort of update.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    140. Re:Crackfix please by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Have you ever had experiences like this, where someone has given you free/cheap drugs to get you hooked?

      Now I am not saying it doesn't happen, but I question how often it does happen, since it is not needed from what I have seen.

    141. Re:Crackfix please by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Heroin.

    142. Re:Crackfix please by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Heh.... Point your wife to Cherrytv.com. :-)

    143. Re:Crackfix please by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Some of us use OSes where we don't have to reformat to install a new (release) version.

    144. Re:Crackfix please by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

      And he's talking about downgrading to an old (unsupported) version... basically completely switching operating systems. If you were installing Linux (which of course is what you're talking about) on a new PC that came with Windows, you'd just reformat.

      Claiming that installing Windows 7 will make reformatting impossible is silly, and that's what I was responding to.

    145. Re:Crackfix please by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is slashdot. MS can NEVER be seen as anything but evil here.

      You're lying. Slashdot frequently has pro-M$ posts. M$ marketers and M$ marketing victims appear to have their very own reality distortion field and can't cope with a website that has any alternative points of view at all.

      When websites like microsoft.com or Paul Thurott are fair and balanced then you might have a point. Until then any so-called bias by slashdot website contributers is just balancing out a tiny fraction of the incredible volume of propaganda coming out of Redmond and their client websites.

      Oh, and to anticipate one snide comment: "M$" is a reminder that they are currently costing the world USD$50,000,000,000+ per year for a dozen programs mostly written decades ago with the most difficult bits, the device drivers, being written by third parties. It's also a response to them putting multiple marketing keys on general purpose PC keyboards.

      ---

      Adopt an astroturfer. Make their life hell.

    146. Re:Crackfix please by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Marketing is more relevant than internet word-of-mouth. You don't know what you're talking about at all.

      Quality products sell themselves by word of mouth. It's only non-differentiated and inferior products that need significant marketing. Marketing parasites hate to admit that of course.

      ---

      The majority of modern marketing is nothing more than an arms race to get mind share. Everybody loses except the parasitic marketing "industry".

    147. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q. What food decreases a woman's libido?
      A. Wedding cake.

    148. Re:Crackfix please by Allador · · Score: 1

      Could you not even be bothered to read the article you linked?

      They have ~$25B in cash.

      They're selling bonds to generate ~$3.75B in additional cash.

      They clearly dont 'need the money', they're just leveraging the credit situation and their own good credit rating. It's no different than someone who borrows against equity against their home at 4.5% and re-invests that into the stock-market to earn 5-10%.

    149. Re:Crackfix please by willyd357 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm one of those people you hear about on TV, and even I thought it was funny.

    150. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. No one gets hooked to anything after one free sample.

      exactly!!! and in order to get someone hooked youd need to provide multiple samples over a long time period, with no guarantee the person would get hooked in the short term (usually takes months or years for use to escalate to dangerous levels) at which stage the addict has usually found a number of other dealers of the smae product (for the times when the first is not available, doesnt have product, or simply cos the others are cheaper).

      So thats why no dealer does this.

      People do get addicted tho all on their own without help from dealers.

    151. Re:Crackfix please by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those people you hear about on TV, and even I thought it was funny.

      For the sake of rhetoric I try to assume that people put a bit of salt in the grain of insight I sometimes offer. The point being that this Moderator probably had some pre-conceived bias that he/she felt deserved a down-mod. I was being presumptuous about the motivations, but that's really besides the point. People view things through their own biases.

      Best regards,

      UTW

    152. Re:Crackfix please by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is why Linux is the OS used by the majority, and Windows merely has a ~1% market share.

    153. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it can be aggravating at times, but sometimes the demo is an earlier or custom build, and as such, it is possible the file could not be compatible with the full game.

      At least, it's probably not something they're thinking about, especially if their demo is 15 minutes long, you might not even be starting at the start of the game.

    154. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect example of being a reverse fanboi there, Chuck. It's not just happening on Slashdot.

      And protesting that you were being a little sarcastic would only work if you were, well, sarcastic.

    155. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought MS stopped putting valid keys on the labels. There was this problem, you know, of people actually looking at other people's PC and writing down their keys! Now the key on the label is just a dummy.

    156. Re:Crackfix please by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      shutdown -a :P

    157. Re:Crackfix please by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is why Linux is the OS used by the majority, and Windows merely has a ~1% market share.

      No, it has little to do with marketing or the worth of the product. Windows is dominant primarily because of the economic network effect and M$'s alleycat ethics. The network effect is particularly strong with "IP" because development costs are fixed and distribution costs approach zero. "IP" markets are usually unstable, winner take all markets because it's always going to be cheaper for one vendor (with development costs of $x) to supply n people than m vendors (with total development costs of $x*m) to each supply n/m people. And we all know what happen with monopolies.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    158. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? The first time you open notepad on Windows 7 it silently upgrades all your .txt files to the new MSTXT format. This not only uses a new standard for line endings (FF, ESC, BEL) but adds a layer of DRM ensuring your .txt files will be unreadable when the release candidate expires. And it uses wifi to update all your USB keys and external hard drives even when they aren't plugged in. MS are purest evil.

      You forgot to mention, all files will now have an extra 666mb added to the file size because of this.

    159. Re:Crackfix please by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I recently got married.

      The sex is still great :)

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    160. Re:Crackfix please by horcy · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? If it shuts down at predictable intervals, it's a big improvement... *ducks*

      That's what I thought. A major improvement and good for the mouse arm. I love this new feature.

      --
      Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
    161. Re:Crackfix please by Doctor+Ruff · · Score: 1

      I could get more into specifics

      Or we could grab a copy of the Prima Guide to Dope Wars.

    162. Re:Crackfix please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a god damn idiot.

    163. Re:Crackfix please by Meski · · Score: 1

      Sure, after all, we synchronise our raids to Blizzard's restart times, and they repopulate the trash. (some of it)

  2. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I Just changed my system clock to see what would happ

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I Just changed my system clock to see what would happ

      Well? What happened? You stopped in the middle of typing like you were talking about Candlejack or somethi

    2. Re:Um... by nomorecwrd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Whooosh!!
      (for the modder)

    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      --um if there's a 'whoosh' here it's yours dude.

    4. Re:Um... by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      I seem to have all the lines of the comments cu

    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did it take you two hours to write that sentence? That's like .3 words per min

    6. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >#27907725

      >#27907989

      samefag.

      srsly, you thought someone wouldn't call you out on that?

    7. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I eagerly await /b/'s return. In the meantime, Slashdot has quite obviously turned into 4chan.

    8. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha are you serious dude's junk got jacked mid-type....lol....

      I'll change mine too. let's see wha

    9. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys, this is impossible. If your system shut down while you were posting, nothing would happen. You have to at least click the prev

    10. Re:Um... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      but who clicked 'submit'?
      o_O

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    11. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and rebounds.. back to you.

    12. Re:Um... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You guys must be really slow typers.

    13. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello?! You can't mention Candlejack and suddenly dis

  3. You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First off, might I applaud Davey Winder for his even handed non-biased journalism:

    Has Microsoft gone mental?

    What is totally mental, and I mean running around the supermarket without your pants on shouting "where is the mustard" mad ...

    Here is what Mental Microsoft has to say on the matter

    I get it, you learned a new word: mental. Please, try to use it in moderation and only when discussing things with your too cool for school third grade friends.

    Really, you sound surprised. Didn't they warn us about this anyway? That's why the general populace was not supposed to install this. For savvy users with their old image on a backup drive it's a minor inconvenience.

    Can one automagically revert to the legal Windows (if any) they had installed before they installed Windows 7? Of course not, this would make sense. And provide an easy way out of migration. For those who need an ill formed & flawed car analogy: It is like taking a new car for a test drive only to return to the dealership to discover that your old car has been crushed into a cube.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      Indeed - M$ has done this since WinNT - I had installed a winnt server from the "trial" cd they sent our company and it would reboot on the hour after the 180day period. I was perplexed when we called them to purchase and they told us we would need to re-install - back in those days there was no "exporting the domain and user settings" that was actually workable/sane. Does not surprise me at all.

      I do know I can upgrade from the beta of SME server 8 to the full version without any problems... or re-installs or losing users.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Xugumad · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm damn sure there was a warning in the giant pages of stuff I had to read before I was given the W7 RC. Certainly, I read this and went "Erm, yeah..."

      On top of which, it's always been very clearly "Do NOT install on a production system, this is for testing only". If it wiped my drive wholesale, it wouldn't be a catastrophe, because it's not on a system I can't trivially re-install. Methinks he didn't really read all the details...

    3. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For those who need an ill formed & flawed car analogy: It is like taking a new car for a test drive only to return to the dealership to discover that your old car has been crushed into a cube.

      It is clearly stated on the site where the Release Candidate is downloaded from that it is not recommended to install on your main machine as it will be necessary to reinstall a different OS at the end of the evaluation period. It is intended to be used on a testing machine, or by people who don't mind reinstalling after March next year.

      It amazes me that Microsoft give away a trial version of their new OS for anyone to try out for almost a year and there are so many people whose response is negative. If you don't want to have to reinstall next year then don't use it. Or wait for the retail release and buy a copy.

      If I gave you a house on a rent-free 12 month lease would you piss and whine about how inconvenient moving out would be?

    4. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Z00L00K · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hardly surprising, and Windows 7 is just slightly better than Vista, but I'm not able to get that spartan (relatively) look and feel of Windows 2000 to get the job done instead of suffering from Microsoft trying to make me feel Awesome and Impressed by their way of overcooking a GUI.

      And Windows Vista and Windows 7 are both not very friendly for advanced users.

      Sure - mod me troll, but that's my opinion!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by couchslug · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "If I gave you a house on a rent-free 12 month lease would you piss and whine about how inconvenient moving out would be?"

      Not if you pay for naked odalisques to carry me out on a sedan chair.
      Otherwise, yes.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by GauteL · · Score: 1

      If I gave you a house on a rent-free 12 month lease would you piss and whine about how inconvenient moving out would be?

      While I agree with your intent, I would chose my analogies more carefully.

      In the case of Windows 7, you won't have saved anything if you purchase Windows 7 a year later. It will still be the same price. At most you would have saved a few quid interest on putting your money in the bank during your year of free Windows 7.

      Since housing is so incredibly expensive in comparison, you would most likely have saved an absolute fortune in rent/mortgage interest, that you could have saved up as part of a deposit on a house of your own.

      Thus, free rent for a year is a massive boost to anyone which is certainly worth the hassle of moving out.

    7. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think Win7's more super-user-friendly than Vista, and as far as I can tell, there's not really anything missing compared to XP. Would you be able to point me to the Win7 specific issues (not the ones that are Windows in general, as we all know there's many of those).

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    8. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by armanox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Start Button -> (Right Click) Computer -> Advanced System Settings -> Perfomance -> Adjust for best perfomance

      Actually, I think just unchecking Use Visual Styles does the trick.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    9. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      This is modded insightful? Really? Your analogy is frankly dumb. For your analogy to work MS would have to come and smash your PC. If you installed Windows7 over your primary OS, then you're even dumber for installing a BETA OS as your main system.

    10. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      First off, might I applaud Davey Winder for his even handed non-biased journalism:

      The nice thing about blogs as a form of journalism is that people don't /have/ to be non-biased. What we get is even better, they can be openly biased -- leaving no doubt as to how their own personal beliefs influence what we read.

    11. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Can one automagically revert to the legal Windows (if any) they had installed before they installed Windows 7? Of course not, this would make sense. And provide an easy way out of migration.

      ...

      Sure you can. If you want to revert to your old OS, then don't delete the old OS when you install the RC. Add the RC as a second bootable OS. When you're done with it, remove it. Why are computers so confusing for people on Slashdot?

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    12. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I'm wondering what all the fuss is about. I'm installing it in a VM for testing purposes, although I have no intention of running any Windows OS in production on my development LAN. I'm just making sure I keep up with things on the off chance I get a client who requires Windows 7 support.

    13. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

      You've just won this year's award for nitpicking. Congrats.

    14. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this isn't a fair analogy because you are once again saying that you are SUPPOSED to OVERWRITE your current OS for a RELEASE CANDIDATE.

      Let me break this down for you:

      RELEASE CANDIDATE: Candidate for Release, not actually a sellable, complete, for use environment or operating system.

      The car analogy is more like saying you are going to sell your old car and take a concept car for a test drive. When they tell you that you can buy the car, your refuse, and then complain when you don't get your car back. You can easily keep your old car.

      To put it back into real terms-- YOU are turning your car into a cube. YOU are installing the RC over what you currently run. NOT MICROSOFT.

      You are getting rid of your old OS and then complaining when you can't got back to it. Install the RC on a different machine LIKE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO and perhaps you won't bitch about how MICO$$$$$$OFT is preventing you from being an asshat.

    15. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Aphoxema · · Score: 0

      You've just won nothing for being a plain old nit.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    16. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Ok, but how do we get rid of the stupid start menu and go to a simple production oriented one like the windows 2000 or "Classic" one?

    17. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more like you sell you car for scrap because the local Big Brand Manufacturer is offering 48 hour test drives, then they use GPS to track you down and reclaim it when your 2 days are up.

    18. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who need an ill formed & flawed car analogy: It is like taking a new car for a test drive only to return to the dealership to discover that your old car has been crushed into a cube.

      Ill formed and flawed? I'll take it a step further. That is a retarded car analogy. Microsoft has said many times that Windows 7 RC is not designed to be used in a production environment. If a person wipes their XP or Vista partition to install Windows 7, and hopes to automagically revert back to their old OS at some point, then they deserve to have their "car crushed into a cube".

    19. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      ... and the only help available for the modem is online...

      Installing an OS with an installer is all well and good.
      Then you have to install the drivers, updates, patches, etc...

      Special tools to update your firmware so that the old OS will work again.

      So yes, I'm going to piss and whine. Moving in, the realtor supplied for free an interior decorating company, installed new siding on the house at his own expense, and was sunshine and roses.

      Moving out, we find that squatters have lived in the house we want to go back to, the wiring and pipes have been stripped out by metal salvagers, and the place was condemned. And the realtor says "You're on your own."

      What's not to like?

    20. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Wayne's World called....they want their colloquialisms back.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    21. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just won nothing for being a plain old shit.

    22. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      It depends on how nice the house is. ;) With Windows, we're talking about a single-wide in a ghetto; it may be functional, it may be new and have a few pretty or nice features, but it's only just functional and there are a lot of neighbors who constantly try to break in and steal your stuff.

      Linux is like a townhouse - nice but a bit thrown together with a few other homes. It's in a decent gated-community though [not that I'm necessarily a fan of gated communities in real life].

      OS X is like the nice mansion on a street on the good side of the tracks. It has its problems and people still want to break in to steal your stuff but at least the home is functional, large, secure, and pretty.

      So yeah, even rent-free, a single-wide might just lead to a little complaining about moving out. :)

    23. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Agreed, though to nit pick a car analogy (I apologize in advance) they are just offering me a new test engine and telling me they will toss the old one if I don't make arraignments.

      At the end of the year the only thing crushed on any of my RC test machines will be the partition Windows 7 is installed on and I'll be the one that pushes the button. That's the plan anyways.

      I keep disk image backups of my installs. Also I won't be using the RC (or any non-Google beta) on a production machine. It's not supposed to be the machine that stores your data. They seemed to make that clear, to me at least. Lastly, the machine I'm currently running it on Tri Boots between Windows7, XP, and Ubuntu.

      Windows 7 sits on its own partition. When that partition gets deleted XP and Ubuntu will still be there. And if something goes haywire an W7 eats the other partitions, well they are backed up and restored from a separate HDD.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    24. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      And you've just lost at wit.

    25. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has everyone forgotten how to dual boot? Put Windows 7 on its own fucking partition. Then you can actually continue to run (and receive updates) for both and if you're actually interested in evaluating it you get to use identical hardware for comparison. When you're done reformat Windows 7's partition or buy and upgrade to retail and use the migrate function.

    26. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1
      he download page was a short faq. the most prominent (in bold) point was:

      To avoid interruption, youâ(TM)ll need to rebuild your test machine using a valid version of Windows before the software expires. Windows will notify you that the expiration process is beginning and two weeks later your PC will begin shutting down every two hours. The Beta expires on August 1, 2009, and bi-hourly shutdowns will begin July 1, 2009. The RC will expire June 1, 2010, and the bi-hourly shutdowns will begin on March 1, 2010. In both cases, youâ(TM)ll need to rebuild your test PC to replace the OS and reinstall all your programs and data.

      so no, you didn't have to read 'giant pages of stuff'. you just had to keep your eyes open.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    27. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      It's 'cause I took a hit.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    28. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by armanox · · Score: 1

      The "Classic" Start Menu, much like the program manager, was deprecated (XP for Classic, 95 for Progman) and removed (7 For Classic, 2k for Progman).

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    29. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth be told, he (anyone who would take you on this free offer without feeling bad about it) probably would.

    30. Re:You're Surprised at No Take Backs? by thexile · · Score: 1

      Yes.

  4. Late to the party! by TheRealJobe · · Score: 5, Informative

    File this under already announced before RC1 was released to the public, and file a second copy under you get what you pay for.

    1. Re:Late to the party! by Thermal+Ions · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this *news* item is far from news. It's the same arrangement as exists with the beta.

  5. I See No Problem With This by fyrie · · Score: 5, Informative

    MS has been upfront about this since before they pushed the RC.

    1. Re:I See No Problem With This by KiltedKnight · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. If it was part of the EULA (there's that dreaded acronym again), then the users have no reason to complain about it. Though if nothing else, Microsoft might want to consider giving people who download and use this beta a discount on their "official release" copy.

      --
      OCO is Loco
    2. Re:I See No Problem With This by localman57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll go further than that. I'm glad they did it. I assume they're going to stop issuing downloadable security updates to the RC in March. As a user of the internet, I feel that there are already far too many unpatched Microsoft OS based Zombies lying in wait to do horrible things to people. It seems that a pre-release OS which could be in the wild for years without updates (by design) is a threat to the rest of us.

    3. Re:I See No Problem With This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? You're not supposed to use the RC for anything but testing. It's not a "beta" in the Google CYA sense. It is a timebombed piece of software. It is provided so that you can test whether Windows 7 suits your needs and whether the applications you write are compatible with Microsoft's next OS. You can learn how to configure/administrate/use Windows 7 before your customers inundate you with their problems when Windows 7 is released to the unwashed masses. It is not a free OS. If you want Windows 7 as your everyday OS, you're going to pay for it.

    4. Re:I See No Problem With This by AlexBeck · · Score: 0

      You are basing this on what?! Oh, right, nothing..

    5. Re:I See No Problem With This by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I just installed it this weekend. It is indeed part of the EULA (I skimmed it). What gets me is that I made a 30GB partition for the 64bit version, and the install has taken up almost 20GB of that. I can't check now, it may be because the automatic swap file size is retarded because of the 6GB of RAM in the box, but still... 20GB for a damn OS?

    6. Re:I See No Problem With This by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      As a user of the internet, I feel that there are already far too many unpatched Microsoft OS based Zombies lying in wait to do horrible things to people

      You are basing this on what?! Oh, right, nothing..

      Yeah, I can't imagine where he'd get such a wild and kooky idea as that one. Kids these days.

    7. Re:I See No Problem With This by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Watch there be a Windows 7 RC botnet worm that includes a crackfix so that it can keep taking advantage of whatever W7 RC security holes there are.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    8. Re:I See No Problem With This by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      er... you don't even need to read the EULA to know this. It's the second bullet point after the "Here's what you need to know" on the Windows 7 download page. The one that says Watch the calendar in bold.

      Other bolded items in that bullet point are June 1, 2010 and March 1, 2010 (twice). Gee, should read the unbolded text to find out why those dates are important?

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    9. Re:I See No Problem With This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the second bulleted item on the download page. It even warns you two weeks before shutdowns start.

      Watch the calendar. The RC will expire on June 1, 2010. Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours. Windows will notify you two weeks before the bi-hourly shutdowns start. To avoid interruption, youâ(TM)ll need to install a non-expired version of Windows before March 1, 2010. Youâ(TM)ll also need to install the programs and data that you want to use. (Learn more about installing Windows.)

    10. Re:I See No Problem With This by AlexBeck · · Score: 0

      I assume they're going to stop issuing downloadable security updates to the RC in March.

      That part.

    11. Re:I See No Problem With This by poached · · Score: 1

      If they give discounts for people who downloaded the RC, then EVERYONE in the world would download a copy whether they install it or not just so they could qualify for the discount. Me thinks that's a bad way to go to make money.

      I can't believe people would bitch about this. I mean it's May now and March is like TEN months away. Holy cow - TEN months. Like seriously Windows 7 would probably get its first service pack around that time; almost 2 new versions of Ubuntu would be out, and Snow Leopard would have been released. That is so much time for people to try out the OS and decide if they like it. Hey if you can stand it enough to keep in on your machine for TEN months, then maybe you see some real value in it and that it is worth spending some money on (you can even start budgeting now if that is a concern for you). I mean how long do people keep their "playing-around-with-Linux-distro-of-the-week" around? And I'm fairly sure there is a windows migration tool to help moving data from older windows version; it might actually work from RC->RTM. If not, Microsoft should make one and make sure people know about it.

      Also think about the money custom builders could save from now till March. Instead of forking out for a windows license, put 7 on the machine and delay the cost of the operating system. That easily shaves $200 off a build and you can buy better hardware with that money. What's NOT to love?

    12. Re:I See No Problem With This by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Yep, I was just having a bit of fun. Historically though, they do not continue providing updates for betas and RCs once the final release is out. Nor should they be.

    13. Re:I See No Problem With This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is weird. it takes about 7gb on my system. but yeah i only have 2gb ram.

  6. Crippleware by Locdonan · · Score: 1

    They my have just realized that a year was way too long for a free, stable version of Windows.

    Next thing you know, they are going to offer to let you share the software with a friend, but only offer 20% of the capabilities. Free copy of Wolfenstein included!*

    *First mission only

    --
    If I wrote something witty, you would say I stole it from somewhere.
  7. Upgraded by T+Murphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I seriously doubt it shuts down every two hours. No Windows system is stable that long at a time.

    1. Re:Upgraded by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt it shuts down every two hours. No Windows system is stable that long at a time.

      To be fair they achieve this guiness book of records feat by forcing the machine into sleep state C1 for the last 1 hour thirty minutes.

    2. Re:Upgraded by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be awesome if Apple made an ad mentioning that since Microsoft users are so used to random crashes they made it a feature in their new release.

    3. Re:Upgraded by HerculesMO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whilst modded "funny", it's this preconcieved notion and the spite of the *nix community that actually makes their arguments look far poorer.

      I took a RHEL class (instructor FROM RedHat) a while back, and 1/4 of the class was dedicated to bashing Windows. Oddly enough, most of his complaints were from a lack of knowledge, not because of the OS, so what does it say when you keep pushing that kind of attitude when people are trying to make *nix more successful and widely received?

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    4. Re:Upgraded by need4mospd · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not true, mine has been stable fo

    5. Re:Upgraded by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is that why my XP box has been on for 10 days, and 4 minutes?
      I love when people bash Windows based on their experiences from 10 years ago.
      Ubuntu crashes this box more than XP does...

    6. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be awesome if Apple made an ad mentioning that since Microsoft users are so used to random crashes they made it a feature in their new release.

      No, not at all. It wouldn't even be remotely close to funny even to inspire even half of a laugh.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JixbzFjv_cU

    7. Re:Upgraded by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oddly enough, most of his complaints were from a lack of knowledge

      See also:

      • Windows users on Mac OS X.
      • Windows users on Linux.
      • Linux users on *BSD / Solaris.
      • Linux users on OS X.
      • Everyone on Haiku.

      In summary, people who don't know a system will claim it's inferior to the one they do know to justify their ignorance.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Upgraded by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Yeah I guess a fact-based observation was offensive next to that estimation of 2 hours before the OS crashes.

      Keep fighting the good fight, fanboy, you'll be rewarded with 72 virgins in the next world.

    9. Re:Upgraded by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      My XP install will easily run 20 days. I did an intense render that lasted 14 days non-stop.

    10. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No Windows system is stable that long at a time" - by T Murphy (1054674) on Monday May 11, @11:45AM (#27907843)

      NASDAQ says, & proves, quite otherwise!

      Here is an example of NASDAQ's uptime, AND stability, in a high tpm environs, industrially (using Windows no less):

      NASDAQ keeps on running 24x7, into the fabled "5-9's" of 99.999% uptime using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 (in failover clusters) since late 2005, acting as the official dissemination system of official trade data:

      ----

      NASDAQ Migrates to SQL Server 2005:

      http://windowsfs.com/enews/nasdaq-migrates-to-sql-server-2005 [windowsfs.com] [windowsfs.com]

      &/or

      NASDAQ Uses SQL Server 2005 - Reducing Costs through Better Data Management:

      http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/09/17/sqlauthority-news-nasdaq-uses-sql-server-2005-reducing-costs-through-better-data-management/ [sqlauthority.com] [sqlauthority.com]

      "NASDAQ, the worlds first electronic stock market replaced its aging mainframe computers with Microsoft® SQL Server 2005 on two 4-node clusters to support its Market Data Dissemination System (MDDS). Every trade processed in the NASDAQ marketplace goes through the system with Microsoft® SQL Server 2005 handling some 5,000 transactions per second at market open. The system also responds to about 10,000 queries a day and is able to handle real-time queries against data without slowing the database down."

      +

      Case Studies - Financial Services:

      http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2005/en/us/cs-financial-roi.aspx?pf=true [microsoft.com] [microsoft.com] [microsoft.com]

      "NASDAQ Deploys SQL Server 2005 to Support Real-Time Trade Booking and Queries

      NASDAQ, which became the worlds first electronic stock market in 1971, and remains the largest U.S. electronic stock market, is constantly looking for more-efficient ways to serve its members. As the organization prepared to retire its aging large mainframe computers, it deployed Microsoft® SQL Server 2005 on two 4-node clusters to support its Market Data Dissemination System (MDDS). Every trade that is processed in the NASDAQ marketplace goes through the MDDS system, with SQL Server 2005 handling some 5,000 transactions per second at market open. SQL Server 2005 simultaneously handles about 100,000 queries a day, using SQL Server 2005 Snapshot Isolation to support real-time queries against the data without slowing the database. NASDAQ is enjoying a lower total cost of ownership compared to the large mainframe computer system that the SQL Server 2005 deployment has replaced."

      ----

      SO, that all "said & aside" - You want PROOF of that "stability/uptime", you say?

      OK, see here -> http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=MarketShare [nasdaqtrader.com] [nasdaqtrader.com] [nasdaqtrader.com]

      "NASDAQ is renowned for its high performance technology and has proven reliability with 99.999+% uptime. Whats more, firms count on NASDAQ for unsurpassed speed and tested capacity to execute trades quickly and efficiently."

      ----

      So much for your humor... because, in the end? That's ALL it is... poor humor.

      APK

      P.S.=> I'm going to take a risk, & assume you're another "Pro-*NIX" sheep - &, thus, that you're ignorant of HOW to keep a Windows system running in a stable high performing fashion... &, yes, that happens. Stability, security, AND performance often are determined by the person(s) running the Windows (or even *NIX variant systems) & taking care of/administering them... apk

    11. Re:Upgraded by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Yeah this box will keep going and going. The only reason it's at 10 days is because a t-storm knocked out the power one evening.

    12. Re:Upgraded by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Is that all you have? You seriously couldn't think of something more clever than that?

      This is going to make your head explode, but XP loads up much faster than Ubuntu on this machine. About 10 seconds faster. Not that 10 seconds is a big deal, but you're the one that seems to think an OS should be judged on boot times.

    13. Re:Upgraded by chazzf · · Score: 1

      Which is why my XP machine at work regularly breaks a month of uptime, rebooting only to install patches. Instability like that on Windows 2K or newer points to user error, not a fundamental flaw on the part of the operating system.

      --
      No statement is true, not even this one.
    14. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why my XP box has been on for 10 days, and 4 minutes?

      I love when people bash Windows based on their experiences from 10 years ago.

      Ubuntu crashes this box more than XP does...

      Hell, my VISTA box stays on for days at a time with ZERO crashes....

    15. Re:Upgraded by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but if *nix is the one fighting for desktop market share, the Windows users on *nix is kind of irrelevant since that's the market you're trying to reach.

      That said, not *everyone* on Haiku is clueless... I've used BeOS since version 2, so I hope that I have *some* understanding. :)

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    16. Re:Upgraded by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this, and it's not true anymore.

      Chances are, if XP or Vista crash it's due to drivers, not the OS. Vista/XP are actually pretty stable.

    17. Re:Upgraded by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I wonder if your list omits "BSD on *" on purpose, or you just forgot about its existence? ~

    18. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody gives a shit about BSD.

    19. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 10 seconds faster.

      So Ubuntu takes 10 days, 4 minutes and 10 seconds to boot on your system? I think I see your problem, and it's not the operating system...

    20. Re:Upgraded by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      You win the prize for most obtuse anonymous coward of the day! Grats!

    21. Re:Upgraded by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Try moving the mouse.

    22. Re:Upgraded by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      No, because I was talking about users. While *BSD developers (with the possible exception of the NetBSD team) are generally hostile to other platforms, *BSD users tend to run a more heterogeneous, and will more often pick platforms based on their merits.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Upgraded by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Second that. I haven't had XP crash on me in well over two years. I had some slowdowns and reinstalled about a year ago just to clean things up, but as far as BSOD or hang-ups goes - haven't seen it for quite a while.
      Only issue that bugs me is that XP fails to boot if I have external USB storage device plugged in - althou I suspect bios on that one.

      Same for linux on the second machine. But then... on my (small and handy - perfect for flacs) spare athlon XP1800+/1G sdram I will have to install wXP to get any practical use of it - 8.04 and 9 betas ubuntu fails at playing back even basic DVDs (x11 must die and suspect savage4 drivers to suck). Might try windows 7 just for kicks on that one :D

      So, in general - windowsXP is the new NT4sp6a for me. And by all looks might stay that way for a while.

    24. Re:Upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP up for ten days! woooooww yeah you da IT god

  8. Story's title is flamebait by krelian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not shutting down to force updates, it's shutting down when the trial period expires.

    This is well known, was discussed here several times and is clearly mentioned on the Microsoft download page.

    To be honest it seems like slashdot has more stories about Microsoft than about Free software.

    1. Re:Story's title is flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not shutting down to force updates, it's shutting down when the trial period expires" to cajole users into updating to the real thing
       
      FTFY.

    2. Re:Story's title is flamebait by Burkin · · Score: 1

      Well of course. Microsoft never said you would get to use the RC for forever.

    3. Re:Story's title is flamebait by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Story's title is still misleading. 90%+ of people would read the title as "force system patch updates", not "upgrading the OS to a different version."

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    4. Re:Story's title is flamebait by colourmyeyes · · Score: 1

      It's like they have some crazy scheme to turn a profit by selling software.

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    5. Re:Story's title is flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest it seems like slashdot has more stories about Microsoft than about Free software.

      Actually it seems like Slashdot is quite desperately trying to find faults with Win7, and only coming up with increasingly ridiculous examples. Windows 7 couldn't have better adverts than this, it must be really good if this is all opponents can come up with. I smell conspiracy, Slashdot and the M$ posters are in Microsoft's pocket.

    6. Re:Story's title is flamebait by zmod3m · · Score: 0

      My belief is the story's title is referring to them "forcing" you to update from the RC to the official release. Of course you could always go back to what you were using beforehand.

    7. Re:Story's title is flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not shutting down to force updates, it's shutting down when the trial period expires.

      This is well known, was discussed here several times and is clearly mentioned on the Microsoft download page.

      To be honest it seems like slashdot has more stories about Microsoft than about Free software.

      Probably because you're some idiot *nix n00b who thinks Ubuntu = Linux. Well let me tell you something, knowing how to write something in MS Word != knowing everything there is to know about Linux.

    8. Re:Story's title is flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shutting down to force [you to] update.

  9. Is anyone else besides me worried... by tekiegreg · · Score: 4, Funny

    That this will wind up in the actual release in some form or another by mistake...it's only so easy to track zillions of lines of code after all.

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Is anyone else besides me worried... by bonch · · Score: 1

      That's like worrying that a plane will accidentally drop a mattress on your head. You can worry about anything.

    2. Re:Is anyone else besides me worried... by Whatanut · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually not as far fetched as that. VMware just had an incident exactly like this with their ESX product. They accidentally left a time bomb from beta testing in their production release. They have since ceased putting time bombs in their beta products because of this.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/13/vmware_apologises_12_august_code/

      --

      yvan eht nioj
    3. Re:Is anyone else besides me worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's still in the release version, just deactivated in some complicated way that will one day fail and start shutting down everything running on Windows. I bet on yet another leap year bug.

  10. Not news by wumpus188 · · Score: 1

    How is that news? MS says about shutdowns right there on RC's download page. Must be a really slow news day, nothing to chew MS for...

    1. Re:Not news by tha_toadman · · Score: 1

      I agree. Why is this newsworthy? Six days after the RC goes public, someone DIDN'T read the notice before the download so they decided to post this info?

    2. Re:Not news by xenolion · · Score: 1

      Its only news cause so many people want to make Microsoft look like an evil company that should be told how to do their own business. The made it clear as can be when you go to their page way before you download, during the download, and again when you install. So this is only news to the idiots that don't know whats going on outside their own little bubbles.

    3. Re:Not news by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't even look to see who posted it. I just assumed it was more idiocy from kdawson.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  11. Been there, done that by lurker412 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It sounds like a fully licensed version of Win95.

    1. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's more time than I could get with Windows ME!

    2. Re:Been there, done that by greymond · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Windows ME (Millennium) but it worked opposite of this RC, it was only working for up to 2 hours per day.

    3. Re:Been there, done that by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You exaggerate! Sometimes I could get Win95 to run for as many as six hours without crashing.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Been there, done that by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Brings back memories. I had mixed feelings when we upgraded to NT. I was more productive, but I really missed all those coffee breaks while the system was rebooting.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  12. Is this really new? by Schnoogs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did everyone think MS was giving away a free OS??? I've come across people in other forums literally cussing out MS as if this is some dirty trick.

    Never underestimate the stupidity of some people. Like they think you have two options with Windows 7...either download the free version or go the store and buy the version that costs $100.

    Morons.

    1. Re:Is this really new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never underestimate the stupidity of Slashdot editors.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Is this really new? by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      either download the free version or go the store and buy the version that costs $100.

      You mean there's a version as cheap as $100 ?

    3. Re:Is this really new? by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

      Your response is completely irrelevant to the point I was trying to make. Whether it costs $1,$100 or $1000 MS clearly wasn't going to give customers the option of downloading a free version that worked indefinitely.

  13. That's OK by MadAnalyst · · Score: 4, Funny

    It won't be much of a pain due to the blindingly fast Windows 7 boot time, right?

    1. Re:That's OK by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      well, 1 minute's interruption every 2 hours isn't bad. the issue is it's an unbroadcast interruption. So say goodbye to anything unsaved at the end of the two hours.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  14. What about Release 7000? by brxndxn · · Score: 1

    The original public release (I believe 7000) stated it would work until August 1, 2009. This hasn't changed, right?

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  15. This might have saved my company a headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We had one customer several years ago who complained that our product stopped working all of the sudden. The customer yelled at us and threatened to sue us out of existence.

    We looked into his problem anf it turns out he used an evaluation copy of Windows 2000 and the license expired on him.

    It was a bank in LA. I forget the name. The bastards are probrably collecting TARP funds.

  16. An upgrade is technically possible... by alta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Say, oh, 15 million people install RC (I did.)
    Come June, you want to start getting paid (you're M$), you have two options...

    1. Release an 'upgrade to paid version' where you charge people FULL PRICE for the equivilent of whatever they're running. (I'm using ultimate)

    2. Force people to pay for the version they choose AND reinstall everything.

    Now, to get the most money out of me, and I'd bet most everbody, they should do #1. A year from now, I'm going to have installed a lot of stuff, done a LOT of customizing and unless it's just time to rebuild, I'm REALLY not going to want to reinstall. I would be HAPPY to pay for Ultimate at that point. The alternative is go back to Vista which I've already paid for or reboot every 2 hours. Neither are good for me, so I'll start looking for a crack. Time is money, and I'd spend way more money rebuilding to get off the RC than I'd spend paying for an ultimate license.

    But, I'd bet Microsoft is going #2. No betting actually, that's the plan. So they're going to have a bunch of people who are just going to deal with reboots. Then there will be a bunch of people who are going to go the cracking route. Then there's the people who are going to pay, but will downgrade because they don't use all that ultimate crap anyway. And what's left, are the people who fall in line and do what M$ wants them too. But think of all the money they could have gotten from the others, had they only offered an upgrade path...

    And it's not like it's a complicated upgrade, just replace the part of the system that makes this an RC build! That's got to be easier than a service pack!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by alta · · Score: 1

      Full disclosure, I expect that between the time the full version is released, and this one expires, I will have a need to reinstall.

      I'm the BOFH here, and when someone needs a new, snazzy fast computer, I order me a new one and they get mine. Trickle down economics really does work! I think dell just came out with some new models :)

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    2. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1

      A year from now, I'm going to have installed a lot of stuff, done a LOT of customizing and unless it's just time to rebuild, I'm REALLY not going to want to reinstall.

      A year from now, I'll still have all my important stuff on my XP partition, which I will upgrade to Win7.

      Before the upgrade, any data worth saving from the old Win7 partition will be copied to my 2nd hard drive, then copied back to my new Win7 installation after the upgrade.

      Then I'll probably convert the old Win7 partition back from NTFS to EXT3 (or maybe EXT4 by then, depending) and reinstall Ubuntu (provided I can get their boot manager to work with my hard drive geometry, which it hasn't in about 2 years).

    3. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Well, they may do a mixture. After all, it was possible to upgrade your Vista install via the Microsoft Marketplace online, so they may take a similar tack with this. Make the upgrade available online.

      One can only hope they will, anyways.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    4. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. Allow both. Those who want to keep their version can pay for a serial number that unlocks it. Others can buy something else.

      From a simplicity standpoint, it's easier to simply do number 2 and give everyone *gasp* an option!

      Seriously, wtf kind of argument are you trying to make here?

    5. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Spyder0101 · · Score: 1

      That would work great, except that unless the system was specifically designed to do this only 1 person has to see this before someone can write crack to do it.

      --
      Troll, n. - Someone who disagrees with me
    6. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      But, I'd bet Microsoft is going #2. No betting actually, that's the plan.

      Yes, it's a documented plan (See "Can I upgrade from the RC to the final version of Windows 7?")

      So they're going to have a bunch of people who are just going to deal with reboots.

      And, in case you hadn't read, the reboots are only phase one. Phase two is that the RC expires on June 1, 2010. This, like the reboot thing, is documented on the RC's download page.

      Having said that, there is a way to upgrade Windows 7 Beta or RC, provided (oddly enough) by the the Windows 7 team.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    7. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You speak as though "RC build" is some kind of code module they can remove. While that is true of the "time bomb" (which Microsoft has put in their pre-release software for years) the rest of the system is also in a pre-release state, with bugs that have since been fixed, default behaviors changed, UIs that were updated after usability tests showed an improvement, etc. Upgrading all of that, in place, is exactly like a service pack.

      Of course, that hardly means it's impossible; quite the opposite, in fact. Vista's own public pre-release cycle (Beta2->RC1->RC2->RTM) were in-place upgradable every step. MS warned that RC2 might not be upgradable on release, but they actually included that warning on *every* pre-release; it's standard. Now, maybe MS has decided that for whatever reason they won't permit upgrading in place from RC to RTM, but I'll wait and see. As for the license, that's up to you; switching to a lower edition (if you don't want to buy Ultimate, but still want to in-place upgrade) would just turn off the features your new edition lacks back in the Vista days, and it seems reasonable they would keep this model.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    8. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like it to be known that I agree with this sentiment 100% and it is why I will be switching to Ubuntu after I'm done with XP.

    9. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you done bitching yet??

      I had thought the point of the RC was for Microsoft to debug and polish their next version, not so you can have early access to their OS.

      If "time is money, and ... blah blah", then why are you even running an RC instead of something stable?

      And do you *know* it's not a complicated upgrade? How many man hours would it take to ensure a smooth and safe upgrade? I don't get why they should support this. It's a fucking RC - don't use it if you can't agree to the terms!

      I have no love for Microsoft but to me their policy regarding the RC is very generous. You guys simply bitch about everything. If you truly want free software that you can fully control, there are very decent alternatives!

    10. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I missed some important updated announcement, Microsoft has already indicated that Windows 7 will be a free upgrade for Vista users. You will get the same level product of Windows 7 that you have in Vista (ie. Windows 7 Ultimate to Vista Ultimate).

      It is a non-issue for those with access to a current Vista license.

    11. Re:An upgrade is technically possible... by alta · · Score: 1

      the rest of the system is also in a pre-release state, with bugs that have since been fixed, default behaviors changed, UIs that were updated after usability tests showed an improvement, etc.

      I thought all of those things were from the realm of BETA, and that a RC is largely the same code as RTM... That is of course, unless they find major bugs that would call for RC2. Additionally, windows update is happily running every day keeping my RC up to date, I would think by the time RTM is here, my system will be 98% the same. Doing a patch on the remaining 2% would be more like a hotfix than a service pack. However, I'm not an OS programmer, so these assumptions may be way off.

      As someone with a little marketing experience, I am familiar with the concept of giving away your BEST (ultimate) demo in hopes that they'll buy your BEST version when the demo expires. But this is an entire OS. Erase all of your stuff and start over kind of pain. I think a large percentage would pay the extra $50 to get ulimate even though they don't need it JUST so they don't have to go through that rebuild process.

      They're making them rebuild anyway, so they're more likely to save their $50 since they arne't using those features.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  17. Who cares? by Aliencow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this being posted over and over on very tech site?

    Who cares?
    You're installing a beta or a release candidate. Do you expect it to be supported forever?

    And are we really surprised Microsoft put in just a tiny bit of protection to prevent the average joe from continuing to use Windows 7 RC forever?

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're installing a beta or a release candidate. Do you expect it to be supported forever?

      No, but is it really so hard for microsoft to sell a cd that will patch the RC install by subtracting out the part that makes it reboot every 2 hours and adding in the differences between the RC and the final retail version?

    2. Re:Who cares? by Aliencow · · Score: 1

      I believe this is not necessary. You should not be playing with RCs and betas on machine you use for actual work, and it could end up creating a lot of support problems for Microsoft from people who installed older versions.

    3. Re:Who cares? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Hey Mr. Buzzkill, no one asked you to use logic. We're trying to bash Microsoft, here. Take your insightful comments to the Apple-bashing articles, where there are still enough people here who will defend the company.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Knara · · Score: 1

      I believe this is not necessary. You should not be playing with RCs and betas on machine you use for actual work, and it could end up creating a lot of support problems for Microsoft from people who installed older versions.

      You're asking for common sense from an AC. The very definition of a hopeless cause ;)

  18. This is a good thing by amaiman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure why people keep bringing up this issue. It's a release candidate being released for evaluation of software that isn't free. If they didn't disable it after a certain date, people would continue to use it indefinitely, and then would expect support as well. By forcing people to upgrade to the release version, it ensures they're not using an old, buggy release candidate. (Whether the final release will be better remains to be seen, of course, this is a Microsoft product, after all :-)

    Everyone is given fair warning about this before installing the RC (which shouldn't really be on production systems anyway). If you don't like what you see, then stop using it, otherwise upgrade to the release version when it comes out.

    A method to upgrade to release without having to completely reinstall would be nice, but they've never done that in the past and I wouldn't expect to see it done this time, either.

    1. Re:This is a good thing by dcohn · · Score: 1

      You can install over the RC. You put the RELEASED Windows 7 CD in your machine and install. Where does it state this will not work if you upgraded from VISTA

    2. Re:This is a good thing by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You're exactly correct up to this line:

      A method to upgrade to release without having to completely reinstall would be nice, but they've never done that in the past and I wouldn't expect to see it done this time, either.

      At least some pre-releases of Vista (RC1, build 5600, for sure... I think RC2, 5744, as well, though I never tried) could be upgraded directly to RTM, in place, without reinstalling your software. I did a clean install anyhow (I always do) but it was possible.

      Back when the RCs came out, MS made a substantial point of saying that you might need to reinstall completely... just like they are now. It remains to be seen whether or not they will permit in-place upgrade from RC, but I wouldn't be surprised in the least. It's logical, and it wouldn't be the first time. In the meanwhile, they're covering their asses by pointing out that there is no guarantee of an in-place upgrade option.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:This is a good thing by dcohn · · Score: 1

      I am wrong and I take back my dumb statement.

    4. Re:This is a good thing by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      people would continue to use it indefinitely, and then would expect support as well

      Since when, in real terms, has MS ever provided free support of any kind in any form? Bugfixes, maybe; patches sometimes; but who in his right mind thinks he can call Microsoft for nonpaid support when there's an OS problem?

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  19. Whats the problem? by ZenDragon · · Score: 1

    I really dont understand what the big deal about this is. A company offers a 1 year evaluation period on new software, with *gasp* an expiration period! Frankly Im surprised they dont just cut it off altogether, like MOST companies offering evaluation versions of their software go. Although given a year of use that might be a little draconian, as people will probably have information on there they would need to access.

    Im all for FOSS and all but damn people, if you really like W7 just pay for the damn thing, or switch to Linux. If you read the official announcements for this release,and didnt just get the iso off a torrent or something, it is clearly stated that there is an evaluation expiration period, this is NOT news.

  20. Slowpoke... by VendettaMF · · Score: 0

    Everyone with the ability to read and any interest of the topic has been aware of this since qwuite some time before the rc download became available.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  21. Windows 7 has become... by Publikwerks · · Score: 0, Troll

    WindowsME

    1. Re:Windows 7 has become... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Windows ME HARDER!

    2. Re:Windows 7 has become... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Vista was WindowsME, Windows 7 is Vista SP3. They just want to get rid of the name "Vista" since it's become synonymous with "Fail".

    3. Re:Windows 7 has become... by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      If Win7 is Vista SP3, what's the point of Vista SP2? They'd be better served abandoning it and forcing everyone to upgrade.

      Win7's an upgraded version of the Vista kernel, we all know that, but it's still forked development. You're doing the discourse a disfavour by diseminating disinformation disguised as disgust.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    4. Re:Windows 7 has become... by darien · · Score: 1

      +1, Alliterative

  22. Three months! by Altreus · · Score: 0, Troll

    You all seem to be missing the point that MS will start shutting down your computer every two hours three months *before* your trial period expires.

    So what this means is that Microsoft is exercising its power to turn off your computer at will while you are still within the period in which you are entitled to be using it.

    Start turning the PC off afterwards, sure. But not before.

    Continuing the trend of poor analogies: that's like them kicking you out of your rent-free house twelve times a day for a quarter of your tenancy period.

    --
    74.117.115.116 32.97.110.111 116.104.101.114 32.80.101.114 108.32.104.97 99.107.101.114
    1. Re:Three months! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over your overblown sense of entitlement.

      Starting in March, the system restarts every two hours. Three months later, you won't even be able to log in. Which means that three month window is for you to GET YOUR DAMN DIRTY DATA OF THE SYSTEM.

    2. Re:Three months! by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're not *entitled* to sweet shit all in an RC version of software. They aren't saying "You can use it for a year, but for 3 months we're going to make it difficult." They're saying "You can use this, but it's not meant to be long term, and we're going to make sure you don't forget that."

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  23. and Microsoft rewards the testers. by purpleraison · · Score: 1, Troll

    How generous, Microsoft enlists people to test their next OS, and instead of being rewarded those poor souls get screwed.

    Yeah, I'm pretty sure Microsoft is trying to get its cake and eat it too.

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
    1. Re:and Microsoft rewards the testers. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Look, I use Linux exclusively for all my development and production work these days, aside from one Solaris 10 box. That said, I've got nothing against Microsoft for expiring the RC in a year. There's nothing wrong with this; if you don't like it, don't use their product.

  24. It's also nicer than the alternative by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The normal course of action for a time limited demo would be to simply stop functioning when your time expires. That is what I expect from such things and how most of them work.

    However, what happens if you didn't get all your data off and so on? Well, this offers you a way to be able to operate the system, just with restrictions. It is a nicer way of handling things.

  25. the day the sun stood still! by MrSaxonite · · Score: 1

    well who's to say that december 2009 will ever end... just dont connect to the internet (those darn tyme sync services), and the computer will be non the wiser....

    1. Re:the day the sun stood still! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      heh!
      glad to know humans are still more intelligent than computers.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  26. what is bad about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is bad about this is the way MS forces you to upgrade - by erasing the disk, along with the OS and ALL of your data, then installing a licensed copy and reinstalling all of your apps and then the data. What could be more inconvenient? What could waste more time? What could be more stupid?

    Why not just have a menu item to click on to buy a valid license key with a credit card - LIKE EVERY OTHER NORMAL VENDOR DOES!

    I just activated a copy of Photoshop Express this way, it's a convenient, easy $90 for Adobe. Doesn't anyone at Microsoft have a triple digit IQ?

    1. Re:what is bad about this by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What is bad about this is the way MS forces you to upgrade

      Stop whining. Microsoft does no such thing. If you don't like their business model, just don't use their products. It's as simple as that.

    2. Re:what is bad about this by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      What is bad about this is the way MS forces you to upgrade - by erasing the disk, along with the OS and ALL of your data, then installing a licensed copy and reinstalling all of your apps and then the data. What could be more inconvenient? What could waste more time? What could be more stupid?

      Using the piece of crap in the first place.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    3. Re:what is bad about this by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't anyone at Microsoft have a triple digit IQ?

      There are thousands, just none in management. Like most companies.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:what is bad about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be dense. This isn't supposed to be a demo, it's a release candidate.

  27. Paying for Windows? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You mean there are people out there who actually pay for Microsoft's OS's?

    That's about as dumb as paying for music...

    1. Re:Paying for Windows? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because built-in botnets are so cool.

    2. Re:Paying for Windows? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Dumbass

      If there weren't people like me "dumb" enough to play for music (CDs) and subsidising your free music collection, just how many music torrents do you think there would be in the first place?

      Kind Regards

      Mr Sick Of Freeloaders

  28. I thought 7 was supposed to be free? by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1, Interesting

    After the debacle of Vista, I could have sworn I read on this very site a few weeks ago that Win 7 was going to offered as a FREE upgrade, at least to Vista users. Am I on crack or did I actually see that story?

    1. Re:I thought 7 was supposed to be free? by xenolion · · Score: 1

      I think it will be an option for those who buy a pc when Win7 is close to release. Meaning if its going to be released in January 2010 and you buy a PC in December 2009 you might get the option for a free upgrade. Its all guessing tho Microsoft has yet to say anything about it.

  29. sales... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont think it will cut-down on new sales (e.g. new machines from hp, dell, etc)

    it might reduce sales of people who have had vista for a year and hate it. or still have winxp and fear for security (1% of residential customers)

    i doubt it will have much issue in the business world, as since most businesses ignored vista and wont install beta/rc code that is going to die on their production machines until its final/stable

  30. This is news? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why the F is this on the front page (or any page) of a geek news aggregation site. If you couldn't figure this out based on the information provided by Microsoft (long before you download/install/use/etc.) Windows 7, you've got no business being near a keyboard. Stand up and take two steps back. How much did IT Pro have to pay to get this piece of crap on the front page of slashdot? I hope it was a lot.

  31. shutdown -a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this would do anything? I mean it wouldn't be to hard to pull off.

    1) script to counter the shutdown -f command with shutdown -a to abort.
    2) set script to run when shutdown command is detected
    3) ???
    4) profit

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. What's New ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every version of windows I ever had shut down my computer every few hours. So what is new ?

  34. Better yet: by Khyber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How long until someone decides that a piece of software has no business shutting down physical hardware and tries suing Microsoft for unlawful trespass? They may have a right to shut down their software but to force a full physical shutdown of a machine is beyond their legal boundaries. This is my CPU, my power supply, my RAM, you have no business turning it off without me saying so. Disable your software all you want. Start fucking with my physical property and trespassing charges will be laid down.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Better yet: by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      If their software shuts down, the machine may as well be shut down.

      Anyone who tried to sue MS wouldn't have a leg to stand on. By installing the software, they agreed to the licensing terms.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Better yet: by Kaboom13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait, so the OS initiating a shutdown (one of the OS's functions) after it passes a clearly defined date, in accordance with the licensing terms you agreed to on an OS you are getting for free to use for testing purposes is illegal? MS has been perfectly clear from the start what this release is for. They would be fully within their rights to have the os stop functioning completely after the date. The only way they would be responsible for damages is if it intentionally damaged the hardware in some way. Heck, if it accidentally destroys the hardware, they are still in the clear because they made it perfectly clear this was a no guarantees testing purposes build.

      This is the ultimate non-story that makes the community look bad because it's pointless anti-ms rabble rousing instead of actual legitimate criticism.

    3. Re:Better yet: by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may want to get outside and tone the nerd-rage down some.

    4. Re:Better yet: by Khyber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What part of "Without Permission" do you not understand. I tell it when to turn my computer off. It does not arbitrarily decide to do without *MY EXPLICIT PERMISSION*

      http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/1030_new.html

      Read the thing in it's entirety. Let's go to terms, here, just the specific ones that would apply in my case.

      (2) the term "protected computer" means a computer (B) which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communications. impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information; Key word IMPAIRMENT.

      (11) the term 'loss' includes any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service; and

      (12) the term 'person' means any individual, firm, corporation, educational institution, financial institution, governmental entity, or legal or other entity.

      There are the parts that absolutely apply.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Better yet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I just posted this on the LinuxHaters blog as the "Freetard post of the day". Yeah, I know you're not a Linux freetard, but this post is so silly and shows such ignorance of law, I figured fellow Linux haters would enjoy getting a laugh out of it.

    6. Re:Better yet: by Khyber · · Score: 1

      For some STUPID reason slashdot ate half of my post.

      It removed:

      (8) the term 'damage' means any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information;

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Better yet: by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Oh come on.. if you read it like you appear to be doing then even having an expiring password would be illegal, because it stops you getting at your data.

      There's such a thing as intent, and reasonable behaviour. If you install a testing version of Win7 *knowing* it'll shut down on you (which it won't start doing until after the final release of Win7 is available anyway) *and* store critical data on a prerelease OS, you haven't got a leg to stand on. Try to take it to court and a judge will kill himself laughing.

    8. Re:Better yet: by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Oh come on.. if you read it like you appear to be doing then even having an expiring password would be illegal, because it stops you getting at your data.

      And it seems he would also think that losing power in a thunderstorm is illegal because damnit he *paid* for that power and his computer is now turned off *without his permission*.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    9. Re:Better yet: by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Except you grant them permission to do whatever they hell you like by installing the OS. We are not talking about your standard EULA everyone ignores. You didn't purchase it, so you only have rights they choose to grant you. They aren't forcing you to install the Windows 7 release candidate, they aren't selling it to you, and they are telling you NOT to use it in any capacity where it might cause you to lose data or productivity. They are providing it so you can test your software and be ready to support it when it is released. If you don't like their terms, don't use it, you have 0 rights in this situation. If I write a program called shutdownin11months.exe and put it on a website with a note that running it will force a shutdown in 11 months, and you probably shouldn't use it, and you agree to the terms, download it, and run it, does that mean you can now sue me when your system shuts down? I told you what it does, what it will do, that you probably shouldn't do it, and how to stop it after you did it anyways, and I'm responsible?

    10. Re:Better yet: by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Baahahahaha, good one! I'd love to see you litigate against Microsoft for trespassing..

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    11. Re:Better yet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always remove Windows 7 RC on the expiration date and avoid the problem altogether. I mean, what's your angle here? You know exactly what it's going to do so I fail to see the issue. Are you going to try to run it after the expiration date?

    12. Re:Better yet: by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Well, some of us *DO* pay for a guaranteed level of service. It's called a service contract, maybe you should look into them.

      And as a quick afterthought to those who say "Doing anything critical or having critical information on a beta version of an OS is stupid," Just how the fuck else are you going to test for reliability? Even garbage data generated for the purposes of database testing is critical data, and it's required to test how some of your stuff may or may not work under a new OS. Any test is a critical one. How do I ascertain reliability if I can't put some data on it and see if it actually will stay there untouched and undamaged?

      I seriously think some of you people look at black and white only and never see the grey middle.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  35. Re:Publikwerks has become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the lamest troll yet.

    Congratulations. Your mom must be *so* proud. (I know your dad is, he was telling me all about it last night while we shagged a few dead sheep.)

  36. I have to install software?! OH NOES by bickle · · Score: 1

    You'll also need to install the programs and data that you want to use.

    Ya think?

  37. Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    about 4 seconds...
    3... 2... 1....

    Hurray! It's shutting me down!

    Fixed that for you.

  38. Shutting down every 2 hours by OTDR · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Shutting down every 2 hours"?

    I didn't realize Windows 7 offered such a significant increase in uptime.

  39. Just the first step by Translation+Error · · Score: 2, Funny

    If that doesn't stop you, it reverts to Windows ME.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  40. Re:Publikwerks has become... by Publikwerks · · Score: 1

    You fucked a dead sheep? Shit, I'll take being the lamest troll ever over necro-bestiality man

  41. News? by LunarEffect · · Score: 0

    I knew this before I installed Windows 7. Isn't this supposed to be common knowledge by now?

  42. Same old same old by Risen888 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dear Windows users,
    Why do you put up with this shit?

    Sincerely,
    Linux users

    --
    Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    1. Re:Same old same old by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Um, dude? Release candidate. Testing code, not the final product you have to pay for. I don't think it's unreasonable for Microsoft to put an end date on their RC code, and it's probably a good thing to give people plenty of warning that their testing copy's going to stop working (especially when it's going to be a year before that date hits and people'll have lots of time to forget they aren't running the actual released version).

    2. Re:Same old same old by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      I get the concept, thanks. I don't think you get what I'm getting at. Here's an example:

      I had an RC version of my operating system running last month. It updated itself to the final version and didn't give me a bunch of bullshit about it.

      Do you see it now?

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    3. Re:Same old same old by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the OS you're referring to isn't one where you have to pay for the released version. Whether you like it or not, it's Microsoft's prerogative to charge for their OS. Since they're not charging for the RC, it being testing code and all, it's not reasonable to expect them to just have it automagically upgrade to the released version without you having to pay for it.

    4. Re:Same old same old by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      The question wasn't about their prerogative; it's surely their right to do whatever they wish with their creation. The question was "Why do you tolerate it?"

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    5. Re:Same old same old by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Because this is one of the few instances where Microsoft has done something both intelligent and ethical.
      And they even had the decency to make this information so clear on the download site that it was the first thing I read about 7 RC beyond an article telling me it was available for download.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  43. As opposed to just crashing every two hours? by mkcmkc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will they include a dialog box so that we know Windows didn't just crash again?

    Actually, this reminds me of an entry from SKB's classic Devil's DP Dictionary:

    blank card n. Also called spacer card. An unpunched card placed in an input deck at 10,000-card intervals. Since electromechanical devices enjoy a consistent 1e10^4 error rate, the blank-card trick minimizes the impact of card-reader malfunctions.

    An oldie, but a goodie!

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  44. Irrelevant by discordant999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why does this matter you have to format and reinstall windows every 3-6 months anyway to clear all the malware worms and the porn that you are even ashamed of

  45. Meh, hackintosh will support i7 + 1gb 4870 by then by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    I actually don't have a physical revulsion to W7 on my new pimp rig, but it's just holding place until I can get a 10.5.7-based hackintosh installer that recognizes nehalem and my 1gb 4870..

    That said, I'm surprised at the lack of suckage of W7, and pretty happy with the ATI folding@home client.. Wonder if it's available for linux and/or opensolaris?

    (been on an osol kick lately, what with ZFS and suncluster for free...)

  46. Dodgy Tactics by SuperAndy · · Score: 1

    Once again Microsoft's methods are dubious, but you are still getting a very good operating system gratis for a year.

  47. This is what's wrong with the internet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the fact that stories like this even EXIST that demonstrate exactly what is wrong with the internet and computers in general.

    I understand feature upgrades, and usability upgrades.. But am I the only one that thinks we should have never made computers easy enough to use for your average, redneck, pop out 3 kids before dropping outta high-school, losers?

    Seriously. These are the idiots complaining about no free lunch. These are the idiots leaving those zombie pc's attached to the internet. These are those we hate.

    And there's a story about their inability to read an EULA.

    What has this internet come to?

  48. Auto-Maintainence by dabas · · Score: 2, Funny

    On my laptop that runs Vista, I already have to restart every 2 hours. But with Win7, If I don't pay, they will do it for me? Sign me up.

    1. Re:Auto-Maintainence by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      You do realize you're supposed to plug it in when the battery gets low, right?

  49. overstate things much? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    Ahh, they're nefariously offering a free trial of their software to allow people to find problems and begin developing software without having to pay for something not in its final state. I even noticed that with pure malicious intent they're informing people of the exact conditions under which it will no longer work. We should probably advance on Redmond, pitchforks in hand. Purging Microsoft with fire is the only way to stop this horrible evil... beta period.

  50. Its only the first RC, out of possibly several. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It seems to me that everyone is also forgetting that this is a Release Candidate. Read Candidate. It is also entirely possible that Microsoft will choose to have a second release candidate.

    So all the griping about how you may have to reinstall upon the commercial release of windows 7 is really counting your chickens before they hatch, you may have to do it again in August with RC2.

  51. Re:Meh, hackintosh will support i7 + 1gb 4870 by t by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember seeing a Linux ATI client but it was ages ago, so I'm probably wrong or it might've been cancelled. Shouldn't matter soon, since OpenCL is a few months/weeks from being usable.

  52. or... by Vitriolix · · Score: 1

    "To avoid interruption, you'll need to install a non-expired version of Windows before March 1, 2010"

    Or... don't install Windows 7 at all? I'll take that option.

  53. I don't like their business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that's why my company didn't use Vista, we kept XP. And after bringing in a Mac Mini and a white MacBook, we may just keep heading in that direction.

    If you keep hassling customers, they find alternatives. Hey Ballmer you dipstick, if I have to back up everything to move to a fresh install of Win7, how 'bout I move everything to one of the Macs?

    Man oh man, who at MS conceived this strategy? Get everybody comfortable with Windows7, then oops, give up your box until we reinstall 7. And who knows if the new 7 is the same as the 7RC?

    1. Re:I don't like their business model by hesiod · · Score: 1

      who at MS conceived this strategy?

      Probably the same people who tried to make it very clear that you shouldn't install an RC on a live system. If you did, then you are only being hassled by your own idiocy.

  54. Blue Screen of Shut Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more Blue Screen Of Death, it's Blue Screen of Shut Down.

  55. So the real end of the RC is... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours.

    .
    Only Microsoft could see a PC shutting down every two hours as "normal".

    March 1, 2010 (not June 1, 2010) is the real end of the Release Candidate.

    1. Re:So the real end of the RC is... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      March 1, 2010 (not June 1, 2010) is the real end of the Release Candidate.

      Yes, you are correct. The RC ends March 1, you then go into a mode that lets you copy your files off and use the computer for a couple of hours at a time. In June the system won't let you login without using safe mode.

      It does mention this in several places.

    2. Re:So the real end of the RC is... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      Yes, you are correct. The RC ends March 1

      .
      Yet Microsoft's download site says the RC will expire on June 1, 2010, not the March 1, 2010 you imply. It is a shame that Microsoft is so misleading on this issue.

    3. Re:So the real end of the RC is... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      It does expire June 1, 2010, that's when it stops working completely. The testing period pretty much ends on March 1.

      They are being pretty forthcoming about it, since it's clearly mentioned when you sign in to download it, in the release notes, during setup and on about a thousand blogs across the Internet.

      To register for Windows 7 Release Candidate (RC), please login here with your Windows Live ID. We strongly recommend only experienced computer users try the software. You should be comfortable backing up a computer, formatting a hard drive, installing an operating system, and troubleshooting your own technical problems. Don't install Windows 7 RC on your primary home or work computer. Windows 7 RC will expire on June 1, 2010. Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours. Windows will notify you two weeks before the bi-hourly shutdowns start. To avoid interruption, you'll need to install a non-expired version of Windows before March 1, 2010. You'll also need to install the programs and data that you want to use.

      Short of using the blink tag for those to busy to read, I think they covered all the bases.

    4. Re:So the real end of the RC is... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      It does expire June 1, 2010, that's when it stops working completely.

      .
      So a computer shutting down every two hours is considered to be normal functionality by Microsoft, and it has to stop working completely in order to be considered to be abnormal functionality.

    5. Re:So the real end of the RC is... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      If that's how you want to read it on your planet, go right ahead.

      The rest of the universe might understand the concept of levels of reduced functionality of a test, trial and time limited software. They might get that concept by, say actually taking 10 seconds to read the lines on how there are levels of reduced functionality in the test, trial and time limited software.

      Here, I'll simplify it:

      The candy bar I have here is best eaten by March 1, it is spoiled by June 1. Now replace candy bar with Windows 7 RC.

  56. $100? Try again! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Current rumors put the price of the starter edition at about twice that much:

    http://gizmodo.com/5148072/windows-7-pricing-starts-at-200-ehh

    But maybe they'll release a Ghetto Edition for $100 that can only run 1.5 apps at once.

    Now excuse me, I have to sell my TV so I can afford Windows 7 Pro.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  57. sid216 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "According to Microsoft: "The RC will expire on June 1, 2010. Starting on March 1, 2010, your PC will begin shutting down every two hours."

    How fucking lame is this... Shuts down the PC every 2 hours. All that will do is piss ppl, off.

  58. Backup in pr by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    And if your backup can't complete in two hours, that's just too bad.

    1. Re:Backup in pr by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i don't think you'd have problems transfering even a terabyte of data in two hours.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  59. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My PC already exhibits this behavior.

  60. Lean Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Microsoft just got Design for Lean Six Sigma?

  61. shutdown /a by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    Why not make a batch script that runs every hour to abort a shutdown?

  62. You're not alone by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure there's an anatomical comment in there, but I'm not gonna go there...

    Neither are the rest of us /.ers :(

  63. BIOS date? by PuckstopperGA · · Score: 1

    Can the product expiration simply be avoided by setting an earlier date in BIOS?

  64. obligatory xkcd by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    I got hard evidence that w7 is better: http://xkcd.com/528/

    1. Re:obligatory xkcd by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Somehow i think godwin's law do not do this justice...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  65. bitch bitch bitch...whine whine whine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft put a warning on the windows 7 packaging saying that is causes cancer...you fuckwit's would be complaining about the font.

    -W

  66. Hahahaha that was fucking funny by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    10 years ago.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  67. How was this a troll? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    So now we just downrate things we disagree with?

    The fact is that Vista is NOT hampered by its DRM. To say it is, is complete and utter bullshit. I can play back ANY media file I have, and I have the added bonus of having the option to add a blu-ray player should i ever hit my head, and decide I want one.

    Downrated to a troll for stating the facts? So be it.

    1. Re:How was this a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact is that Vista is NOT hampered by its DRM.

      Can you copy Vista itself, though?

  68. I have mod points... by Nickodeemus · · Score: 1

    How do I mod TFA down?

  69. Yo, mods... by zogger · · Score: 1

    The above isn't off-topic, just think about the post he is replying to first, then re-read what he wrote/quoted. It is exactly on-topic. It isn't even subtle, it just works.

  70. Batch file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put this in startup and minimize it...

    noshut.cmd :start
    shutdown /a
    goto start

  71. Hibernate by semargofni · · Score: 1

    But is there an option to make it hibernate rather than shutdown?

  72. Sick. Or stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this news entry is confirmed as-is: these guys, they are just sick psichopats.

    They had the golden chance to conquear the market back again, and to get back a lot of lost trust, and they just ruined it. Just sick. Or maybe plain stupid.

    What was in God's name wrong in just warning the user starting February 1, 2009 and then, once and forever, lock the RC end of March. Too easy?

    But no. They have to control you. They have to force you, to frustrate you, to do things in the background without letting you ever know, to show all their b*lls and arrogance, to scream to you: "You are in our hands, we control your PC, that commodity of your life, either we get your money or we can torment you forever when we just wish.. because you depend on us, remember".

    Call this blackmail, arrogance, fooling people with the dream of a 'normal' behaviour (the public RC) in a market perspective (the "Buy Now" button in the RC..). So simple and honest to do.. too simple.

    But what is honest in such a Corporate...? A nice, lightweight and full colored interface that hides a little good honest technique immersed in an ocean of marketing/sales shit?

    Bah.

  73. Not new by NuKeLiTe · · Score: 1

    Shutting down the system every two hours is a big step forward. Other Windows version shut down every ten minutes or so.

    Nice feature!

    --
    Recave
  74. Reebooting every two hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like every other M$ OS to me! I'd be surprised if it didn't reboot every two hours. Of course, that's the initial behavior. Give it a few months for the registry and file systems to get funked up and it will reboot about every hour.

  75. Re:Meh, hackintosh will support i7 + 1gb 4870 by t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you always masturbate in public? Why bring up your enormously off topic pile of hacked together shit?

  76. Not hidden in EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This fact isn't hidden in the EULA. It's in an easy-to-read, bulleted list right above the download link. The page only has like 4 paragraphs on it.

    I've come down on Microsoft as hard as anybody over the last many years, but they're handling this one surprisingly well. And, although I still prefer my Ubuntu box (because I love me an easy-to-use package manager), Windows 7 is without a doubt the best Windows version I've ever tried. It even runs Fallout 1 & 2 (WITHOUT the virtual XP install), which Vista refused to run on my hardware.

  77. Reinstall by mgiuca · · Score: 1

    So how are legit users supposed to get around all the shitty DRM products with a limited number of installs, like Spore and Mass Effect and Adobe CS4?

    Not Microsoft's fault, but it highlights the stupidity of a growing body of products which assume normal users never need to wipe their OS (or, only ever do it once or twice), when in reality it has to be done all the time.