Slashdot Mirror


GM's Hummer Brand To Be Sold To a Chinese Company

An anonymous reader writes in to note that GM will sell its Hummer brand to Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. of China, a little-known industrial firm. For now, the deal will save 3,000 jobs in the US. (The military HumVees are made by a separate company and are not involved in this deal.) "As part of the deal, some GM plants will continue to build the Hummer brand for the new owner, at least for awhile. The company said its Shreveport, La., plant will keep building Hummers for the new owner until at least 2010. ... GM said it sold 5,013 Hummers worldwide in the first quarter, down 62% from the 13,050 that it sold in the same period the prior year." AP coverage has more details on GM's planned divestitures, including the shedding of Pontiac, Saturn, and Saab.

429 comments

  1. An excellent company name by hattig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well if any company was to own the Hummer brand, it should have a name including "Heavy Industrial Machinery Co." in it.

    1. Re:An excellent company name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chummer?

    2. Re:An excellent company name by shentino · · Score: 1

      Khan's la-o-tian you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:An excellent company name by morghanphoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does that take into account that the new hummers are nothing like the old ones? I see a H2 and think soccer mom in a 4x4 rather than military. Not much of a "Heavy Industrial Machinery Co." left in them now.

    4. Re:An excellent company name by akayani · · Score: 1

      Bummer GM (Gross Mistake)

      It's the perfect electric car body as you can fit the batteries in, and that roof and bonnet could hold a heap of solar cells.

      Or maybe a pebble bed reactor with the helium turbine. "The nuclear car for the nuclear family."

    5. Re:An excellent company name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Hummel. Can I have Hummel prease.

    6. Re:An excellent company name by Talderas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because they aren't?

      The original Hummer, HMMWV, is still produced by AM General. GM never produced Humvees for the military. The H1 version of the Hummer was produced by AM General as well, but marketed by GM, and was based off the Humvee design. The H2 and H3 were basically a Suburban chassis with an body that bastardized the HMMWV body design.

      At least the H2 shares some similarities with the H1 model. The H3 model is just trash.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    7. Re:An excellent company name by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Damn, we outsource everything to China and now we have to give them a Hummer?

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    8. Re:An excellent company name by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      There never was much "heavy Industrial Machinery" in them. I'm not saying that to be an asshat. I've worked on caterpillars, drove big trucks, and owned a few 1970's Chevy and GMC's. And in my neck of the woods (northeast US) you really do need 4x4 and good rubber.

      --
      C|N>K
    9. Re:An excellent company name by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I've read the comments of a H3 owner in Australia and he has found it to be a good vehicle for driving around on the local bush trails.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    10. Re:An excellent company name by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I don't like them as well as the the old jeep. Maybe it can go in deeper water, go over bigger rocks,etc. but they are expensive and they get hung up on four wheeling trails that an old CJ 7 Jeep or Toyota 4WD pickup can pass. I had a 94 Toyota that could make it through trails a hummer couldn't. A guy around her got his H1 stuck in between two trees. I would say old towns would have the same issues. Of course a military hummer can drag more stuff with it than the old small jeep but you could carry quite a bit with those jeeps as well, but what if our government spent less money and gave every other infantryman a four wheeler off the shelf from Honda or Yamaha. I just think a Hummer is to damn wide. Build more Strykers for something that size and get something small and handy off the shelf.

    11. Re:An excellent company name by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      I'd take my old Bronco or another CJ over a hummer any day, of course I live in the mountains/forest where the size of a H1 is a liability, if I had the cash to spare and lived in the desert/plains I might like to have a real hummer but someone would have to pay me to drive a H2/H3.

    12. Re:An excellent company name by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I see a H2 and think soccer mom in a 4x4 rather than military.

      If the original ones makes you think of the military (they were meant for the military after all), why on Earth would normal consumers need or want to drive one? When you see your SUV-driving neighbour, does he remind you of a veteran or a soldier, or just another Joe Sixpack?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:An excellent company name by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      My neighbor that drives a H2, reminds me of a Joe 24 pack, maybe if he didn't drive it everywhere he'd be in better shape.

    14. Re:An excellent company name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H2 is a shell over the 1500 series, H3 is over the Trailblazer.

      China just wants a leg in to the the US market to push Chinese crap cars.

      They can also lease the name to who or whatever to push their crap.

  2. Yay by Alethes · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love hummers, and I don't care if I get it from an American or a Chinese.

    1. Re:Yay by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Giggety!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Yay by neoform · · Score: 4, Funny

      You love being able to watch Madagascar while driving and merge without looking?

      Yeah!!! Rumsfeld!!!

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like them in the backseat. I also like them while driving, although that is very dangerous.

    4. Re:Yay by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      American Culture: Made in China

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    5. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, USA now available in USB too-dolla version. Culture? Buy some yoghurt.

      2011 Hummer will be 100% superglue-resistant plastic with lead paint and genuine imitation plastic leather. A fitting end for a gas-munching behemoth.

    6. Re:Yay by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2011 Hummer will be 100% superglue-resistant plastic with lead paint and genuine imitation plastic leather. A fitting end for a gas-munching behemoth.

      So it will actually evolve into the Canyenaro.

    7. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      American Culture: _Manufactured_ in China

    8. Re:Yay by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chinese economy: Made in America.

    9. Re:Yay by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The American economy recovered from the great depression by draining UK's coffers via the lend-lease act. That recovery turned into a boom which lasted nearly 50 years.

      The current Chinese boom is a result of draining America's coffers. Its only a matter of time before the Chinese economy becomes self sustaining and they won't need us anymore. I'm afraid of what will happen when China becomes the new superpower and America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    10. Re:Yay by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid of what will happen when China becomes the new superpower and America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      Why? Is life so bad in Frace? Canada isn't imperialistic, and it looks OK there.

    11. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So it will actually evolve into the Canyenaro.

      That's CANYONERO!

      Can you name the truck with four wheel drive,
      smells like a steak and seats thirty-five..

      Canyonero! Canyonero!

      Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down,
      It's the country-fried truck endorsed by a clown!

      Canyonero! (Yah!) Canyonero!
      [Krusty:] Hey Hey

      The Federal Highway comission has ruled the
      Canyonero unsafe for highway or city driving.

      Canyonero!

      12 yards long, 2 lanes wide,
      65 tons of American Pride!

      Canyonero! Canyonero!

      Top of the line in utility sports,
      Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!

      Canyonero! Canyonero! (Yah!)

      She blinds everybody with her super high beams,
      She's a squirrel crushing, deer smacking, driving machine!

      Canyonero!-oh woah, Canyonero! (Yah!)

      Drive Canyonero!

      Woah Canyonero!

      Woah!

    12. Re:Yay by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Chinese Economy: Designed in America.

      Fixed that for you.

    13. Re:Yay by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The American economy recovered from the great depression by draining UK's coffers via the lend-lease act.

      We drained the UK's coffers by giving them hundreds of ships, thousands of planes and tanks, and megatons of food, fuel and ammunition?!

      Somehow, I think not.

      Though building them certainly got Americans employed again, the stuff the Brits got through lend-lease were paid for by US taxpayers, not by the British.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    14. Re:Yay by Das+Auge · · Score: 2, Informative

      when China becomes the new superpower

      As an American, I think that the rest of the world deserves to have that happen.

    15. Re:Yay by iamzack · · Score: 1

      11 meters long and two lanes wide, 59,000 kilograms of Chinese pride, CANYONERO!

    16. Re:Yay by gintoki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What you say might actually come to pass if it wasn't for all the nuclear warheads that the US posses. "Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys" made me laugh. Its funnier if you have ever been to france and heard how some french people talk about France's doings in WW2.

    17. Re:Yay by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would have eventually driven out the Germans under their own steam... Twice. Really!

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    18. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FYI France is the 3rd largest weapons manufacturer in the world and are essentially tied with the UK for 2nd. Not quite the "whiney cheese eating surrender monkeys" the american press makes them out to be.

    19. Re:Yay by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      As an American, I think that the rest of the world deserves to have that happen.

      As an American, where would would you and your extended family rather live?
      China, or current (or recent) America?

      (bear in mind you may not be one of the protected (USA IT/college educated) class that you are now, and this is a nonreversible, binding decision)

      Also, please tell us 'why', either way.

    20. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It looks ok from far away, but up close you can't help but notice Bryan Adams and Celine Dion.

    21. Re:Yay by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, oh god no.

      Think of the consequences, of an oppressive state, that willingly attacks anyone (esp. cyber attacks), blackmails its neighbours (over North Korea), and completely ignores any laws on copyright (be they good or bad). I mean, right now things are not perfect, but at least in the US you can clean out the political chambers and really bring in fresh blood.

      But who am I kidding. You're all a bunch of self-loathing teens threatening to slash your wrists.

      Cowards.

    22. Re:Yay by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      What the hell?

      Why does the rest of the world (and the US) deserve this to happen?

      By the way, it's "as a US citizen" unless you are lumping Canada, Mexico, and all the nations in South America as countries that have it coming to them.

    23. Re:Yay by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Ah, but Bryan Adams is taking pictures now (which he's actually pretty decent at) and last I checked, Celine Dion was in Vegas.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    24. Re:Yay by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      The American economy recovered from the great depression by draining UK's coffers via the lend-lease act.

      Before reading your comment, I didn't really know anything about the lend-lease act. It was one of those terms I had heard, but didn't know the specifics of. Your comment prompted me to do some reading (wikipedia). And I think I can say that without a doubt you don't know what you're talking about (assuming the information on Lend-Lease is accurate at the time I read it).

      From the article:

      Lend-Lease (Public Law 77-11)[1] was the name of the program under which the United States of America supplied the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, China, France and other Allied nations with vast amounts of war material between 1941 and 1945 in return for, in the case of Britain, military bases in Newfoundland, Bermuda, and the British West Indies.

      And further:

      In sharp contrast to the American loans to the Allies in World War I, there were no provisions for postwar repayments.

      So, technically the lend-lease act was not in any way any sort of drain on British coffers (quite the reverse actually). Now, after the war the "... Anglo-American loan came about. Lend-lease items retained were sold to Britain at the knockdown price of about 10 cents on the dollar giving an initial value of £1,075 million. Payment was to be stretched out over 50 years at 2% interest." That hardly sounds like any sort of drain to me... I'd love to get a million dollar home for $100,000 and then only have to pay it back at 2% over 50 years. And in fact, at least one member of the House of Lords agrees with me (emphasis mine):

      Lord McIntosh of Haringey: My Lords, the loan originally was £1,075 million, of which £244 million is outstanding. The basis of the loan is that interest is paid at 2 per cent. Therefore, we are currently receiving a greater return on our dollar assets than we are paying in interest to pay off the loan. It is a very advantageous loan for us.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    25. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and don't care about the environment either... selfish!

    26. Re:Yay by theodicey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lend-lease during WWII was free for the British.

      Postwar reconstruction, however, was not.

      Britain was nearly bankrupt for the next decade -- there was still rationing five years after the war. And the US made out extremely well -- the British even had to devalue their currency while they were borrowing money. They were less able to invest in infrastructure than the French and Germans, and the long term consequences for British industry (the world's most advanced from about 1850-1930) were severe.

      The point stands -- international lending can be quite powerful.

    27. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See i'm not so worried. I'd much rather be living my life happly eating cheese and drinking whiney than being surpressed by my country.

      France was actually on my short list of where to move when/if America remains on this domination path.

    28. Re:Yay by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Canada isn't imperialistic, and it looks OK there.

      Except the most SOUTHERN point of Canada is still NORTH of Buffalo, New York.

    29. Re:Yay by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (bear in mind you may not be one of the protected (USA IT/college educated) class that you are now, and this is a nonreversible, binding decision)

      Huh? You are saying that I choose between what I am now, or lower class in China? Or are you saying that I choose between lower class in the US vs middle class in China? Having been over there a few times, I can tell you that the middle class there lives better than the poor here. If I had to choose between a job here or a job there of the same level and both equal to what I have now, I'd choose there. Why? Because there is no national debt, and there there is one and only one political party, and everyone knows it. Here, there is only one party, but people are confused as to how the Republicrat party works. They are an up and coming country and being involved in that economy is much more interesting than hanging around with the downward spiral of the US. However, there are other countries I'd pick before China, and I'm waiting on paperwork (all applications done and fees paid, just playing the waiting game) before I pack up and leave the US for long enough to get citizenship in another country so I have some place to live when the US collapses for good.

    30. Re:Yay by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      American Culture: Made in China

      They're welcome to it, as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, this is nothing new.

      America's indigenous art forms have always had to go overseas in order to survive. Why do you think all the jazz musicians in the 40's and 50's had to move to Paris, or why Hendrix and The Ramones had to go to England to break out. Muddy Waters and Willie Dixon were practically destitute until the Rolling Stones took them on a European tour and exposed their music widely (to American audiences).

      It's shocking how much of the greatest American artists have had to leave the country in order to find artistic and financial success.

      As far as the Hummer goes, I'm not sure this is a great loss. The notion that personal automobiles ought to look like (and be as big as) diesel locomotives is one that I will not miss. And I don't think I'm the only one. I've noticed, in fact, that people who are still driving behemoths like the Lincoln Navigator or Chevy Tahoe or GMC or the bloated Nissan Armada look a wee bit sheepish lately when I see them at the gas pumps, sort of like a guy with a fat girlfriend who tries to pretend she's not with him when he runs into someone he knows. In fact, it's exactly like that.

      To think that when the Lincoln Continental was first introduced it was a two-seat roadster built on a Thunderbird chassis and was rather small and graceful and drop-dead gorgeous and with the overblown 80's became as big as an aircraft carrier (and about as graceful) and today looks like a Ford police sedan with edema (and a little extra chrome bolted on).

      The US auto industry, which once made iconic and stunning (if somewhat baroque) masterpieces, now couldn't design their way out of a brown paper bag. Think about it: the biggest hits for the US automakers since the 90s (besides the aforementioned personal sport locomotives) are campy, overpriced, faux-retro clunkers like the recent Mustangs, Dodge Chargers, Camaros and Thunderbirds, designed to make fifty-something baby boomers relive their miserable adolescent gropings in their progenitors' back seats.

      Put a 1955 Corvette next to any Corvette since 2000 to see what I mean. Remember, that '55 Vette cost about $2800 so you didn't have to be a partner in a law firm or a crooked derivatives trader to afford one.

      Anyway, fuck alla that fossil fuel bullshit. I ride a bike. I don't have to make payments, ransom my daughter's college fund to fill the gas tank and when I get to work, my blood pressure is lower.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:Yay by lavalamp70 · · Score: 1

      even if they are tainted with lead based paint, and the parts used to build them aren't within tolerance? Yay Hummer!

    32. Re:Yay by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Think of the consequences, of an oppressive state, that willingly attacks anyone (esp. cyber attacks), blackmails its neighbours (over North Korea), and completely ignores any laws on copyright

      Sorry, could you specify whether you're referring to China, or the US. Hard to differentiate on those criteria. If you'd said "invades or bombs foreign countries on a whim", "kidnaps, imprisons and tortures nationals of any country without due process", I might have guessed.

      Sorry, couldn't resist that straight line.

    33. Re:Yay by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think it was only recently (in the last 7 years) that England finally paid off their debt to us, greatly aided by inflation (my parents now pay monthly on their 30 year mortgage for an entire house what I pay currently for a small apartment)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    34. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving? I think you mean selling. At full recommended retail I might add.

    35. Re:Yay by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      http://www.marcussantiago.com/randumb3/freedom.jpg

      ^your insightfulness in the flesh

    36. Re:Yay by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      By the way, it's "as a US citizen" unless you are lumping Canada, Mexico, and all the nations in South America as countries that have it coming to them.

      -1, Pedantry

      I'm with you on the bizarreness of the OP, but you know exactly what he meant when he said American. It is accepted usage and there is no reason to change it. We've gotten along perfectly fine by saying "the Americas" or "North America" and "South America" to specify the continents.

      "US citizen" is clunky and unnatural in everyday usage. It is not some sentiment that the USA is more important than the continent (though that attitude exists here in excess) but a consequence of having "America" in the name of both continent and country. A similar ambiguity exists with the term "South African" to denote citizens of the country rather than people in the region. "People of/in southern Africa" is used for the region and "South African" for the country, yet I never see a stink raised about that.

    37. Re:Yay by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Currently China is basically borrowing from its own people to keep them happily employed. The borrowed money is lent to the US who in turn fuel the world economy, and keep the Chinese people employed. This continuous lending (basically based on faith in China and US) can't keep going. The carpenter can't keep doing free work for you on the basis that you will pay him in the future, just so he can keep employed. Eventually, his living and raw material expenses will catch up to him, and he will need you to make basic payments. And one day you won't be able to afford the interest plus expenses on the loans (current housing situation).

      Eventually, there will be a sharp currency correction (ex: Russia). But here, the correction will be for the US dollar to drop, and Chinese yuan to go up. US exports will become cheap to the world and businesses will move back into the US. China will have reduced growth as the world can't afford their goods anymore. Unfortunately, most of their buying power is US currency based (all eggs in one basket)... which means their buying power drops too. China obviously doesn't want this, but can't do anything. If they diversify their buying power into other currencies, they accelerate the currency correction process.

    38. Re:Yay by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I do tend to refer to them as US citizens, the term "American" is not ambiguous.

      After all the Brazilians usuallly call themselves Brazilians and not Americans. The Canadians would agree they're technically Americans, but they'd rather avoid the term and stick to being called Canadians. Same goes for the other countries.

      Who else in the world would call themselves Americans? The people of the USA that's who. The ones who would hold a "world series" where the rest of the world doesn't show up. Or have an International Code Council that's not actually international, that creates an "International Building Code" that isn't, etc.

      At least they've stuck to calling themselves "Americans" - would be a bit confusing if they enlarged their claim.

      --
    39. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved the original hummers. You know, the ones that actually had impressive offroad capability. The H2 and H3 on the other hand are just pimpmobiles on a pickup chassis shaped somewhat like the original hummer and made for the sole purpose of "look at me I'm driving a big-ass hummer". I think it's hilariously ironic that they will be made by a Chinese company now, considering a pretty big chunk of hummer owners are gun-ho anti-foreign-vehicle types.

    40. Re:Yay by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China becomes the new superpower and America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      Uhh, I live in one of France's neighbouring countries and have to say that I rather have a bunch of cheese eating (especially since they have excellent cheese, but I digress) surrender monkeys then a congregation of war mongering torturers with dellusional tendencies as neighbors.

      But your mileage may vary, of course.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    41. Re:Yay by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      Regardless of who benefited more from the land lease deal, both the US and UK were and are democratic countries where their citizens can freely speak their mind, voice oppositions, and vote. The whole reason for the land lease was to resist the other industrial heavy weight with little political freedom. It's scary that China of today looks a lot like the fascist states of the 1930s than a flawed democratic country like the US and UK of the same era.

    42. Re:Yay by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      At least the American population can whine, bitch and argue about the legality of what was done. Furthermore, the Americans are able vote and change, though a bit too slowly for my taste, the system.

    43. Re:Yay by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid of what will happen when China becomes the new superpower and America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      And sadly, it won't even be proper cheese.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:Yay by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

      whilst crushing 2 or 3 compact cars completely oblivious to their presence

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
    45. Re:Yay by longbot · · Score: 1

      This is the most insightful thing I've heard anyone say about American cars in bloody ages.

      The American auto industry is an embarrassment, and has been now for about 12 years. They have lost all thew class, charm, and charisma that they had in the golden age, and all of the sensibility that the import boom shocked them into in the 1970s and 1980s.

      People can mock my car all they like. I can get fuel economy almost on par with a Smart Car, and my Escort is 2.5 times it's size. But American car companies can't even make efficient, cheap cars that are easy to fix anymore. It's all about the bells and whistles now. iPod dock and a cooler in the glovebox? Hell yeah! Who cares if it only gets 22MPG when it could have been designed to get twice that much?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    46. Re:Yay by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Bhahahah. I haven't felt this at home since I discovered that other collection of idiots, Harmony Central Amp Forum...

    47. Re:Yay by johnsie · · Score: 1

      I think it's a little bit arrogant for one nation to try and claim the name of a whole continent if the continent has other countries in it. The USA should call itself the US or think of a better name for itself.

    48. Re:Yay by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "US citizen" is clunky and unnatural in everyday usage

      Agreed, I propose we use the word "Fatty" instead since it's shorter and more descriptive.

    49. Re:Yay by Xest · · Score: 1

      Pretty much.

      I like the comment in the summary too about how the armoured version is separate. It seems to fail to mention that the company that produces the armoured version was taken over by BAE, a British company in 2007 (http://www.baesystems.com/Newsroom/NewsReleases/autoGen_107631191035.html). They're still produced in the US though I think at least.

      But effectively this means US companies now own no rights to the Hummer armoured or not. One of the great symbols of Americanism is no longer well, American.

    50. Re:Yay by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Score:5, Plain Wrong

      The US was given military bases, and Britain paid back a billion Pounds sterling (the last payment was made in 2006). So no, it was initially funded by US taxpayers, but ended up being paid for by the British.

    51. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean he wasn't joking when he said all that? There wasn't even the slightest sense of irony?!

    52. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid of what will happen when China becomes the new superpower and America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      China will declare war on Taiwan, don't they have some WMDs there?
      The US will oppose the move at the UN, but who cares? Not China, since the US has become a country of hamburgers-eating overweight monkeys, and China will be free to impose it's will, culture and language to the world.

      You'll get used to it.

    53. Re:Yay by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down, and preferably every other post they've made.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    54. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America takes up France's position of Ex-Superpower Turned Whiney Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys...

      "American cheese" isn't even real cheese. It's only cheese because you passed a law that said it was. The French have you completely outclassed on the cheese front.

      Maybe "Whiney cheeseburger-eating entitlement-junkies" ?

    55. Re:Yay by yabos · · Score: 1

      But the most southern part of Canada is south of America's arm pit, Detroit. There are a lot of areas of the USA more north than South Western Ontario and get just as cold.

    56. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they decide to go the Compensator (As the Wrench Turns) route.

    57. Re:Yay by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      I can get fuel economy almost on par with a Smart Car, and my Escort is 2.5 times it's size. But American car companies can't even make efficient, cheap cars that are easy to fix anymore.

      Uh... You did read what you wrote, right? Or did you trick yourself by putting Hyundai badges on your Escort?

    58. Re:Yay by Malc · · Score: 1

      Rationing in Britain ended 4th July 1954. That's nine years after the war. Compare that with the US and how its standards of living had been shooting up for years.

    59. Re:Yay by Malc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The UK made its last repayment at the end of 2006. This is an article from the Beeb about it. Interestingly, there are still WW1 debts still outstanding, which "Adjusted by the Retail Price Index, a typical measure of inflation, £866m would equate to £40bn now, and if adjusted by the growth of GDP, to about £225bn."

      You can compare this with 1805 when the Battle of Trafalgar occurred. British government debt then equated 30 times their annual revenue. By winning that battle though, Britain become the dominant power, and presumably paid of the debts of all the wars by plundering the rest of the world.

      Quibble: it was the UK, not England, that received the loans from the US.

    60. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually the southernmost point is southwest of Buffalo NY. Your point being?
      Climate-wise, most of southern Ontario is warmer than Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Madison....

    61. Re:Yay by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      If you were actually in Buffalo, as I am, you would know that Canada is really our neighbor to the west.

    62. Re:Yay by SCHecklerX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My kayak and various camping gear, workstands, tools, etc, don't fit on my bike, sorry. Bikes don't work so well in the winter to get to the mountains to ride my board either. And hundreds of miles of hilly roads aren't exactly fun on the bike, and not possible for a weekend away from work anyway.

      But, to you city dwellers, enjoy. Some of us have good reason to own a car, and perhaps even a truck. Enjoy your concrete jungle that is so well suited to the skinny high pressure tires.

    63. Re:Yay by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      You did read what he wrote, right? He's driving an Escort. That car hasn't been manufactured for years.

      The key word in that second sentence you quoted is "anymore."

      Combining the two sentences, he's saying "America can't build a quality car like my Escort, anymore."

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    64. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they don't close their damn seaport every time someone coughs in Brazil...

    65. Re:Yay by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Put a 1955 Corvette next to any Corvette since 2000 to see what I mean. Remember, that '55 Vette cost about $2800 so you didn't have to be a partner in a law firm or a crooked derivatives trader to afford one.

      Brilliant logic there, Holmes.

      That $2800 in 1955 would have been a year's wages for a person with a good job, considering that minimum wage in 1955 was $0.75 an hour....

      0.75 X 8hr/day X 5days/week = $30 / week, before tax.

      It would take a minimum wage person in 1955 just under two years to be able to afford a Corvette, if they needed no money for _anything_ else, and paid no taxes.

      MSRP for the base 2009 Corvette is $48,565. Current minimum wage is $7.25.

      Same calculations:

      7.25X8X5 = $290/week

      Now, it would take someone on minimum wage slightly over 3 years to be able to afford a Corvette. Not exactly a huge jump. And not so much a problem with the price of the car, as it is that minimum wage has not kept up to the cost of living. A person living on minimum wage now is much worse off than somebody living on minimum wage in 1955, across the board. Food, rent, transportation, entertainment....they call cost a significant portion more than in 1955, relative to minimum wage.

      Suddenly that $2800 Corvette's not looking so cheap, is it?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    66. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because your country is not named AMERICA, it's named UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

      Just like there's no country named MEXICO, the real name is (rougthly translated as) MEXICAN UNITED STATES ("Estados Unidos Mexicanos" in spanish)

    67. Re:Yay by Acer500 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My kayak and various camping gear, workstands, tools, etc, don't fit on my bike, sorry.

      How often do you go camping? Once a year? Have you heard... you can "rent" a car :) (or truck or whatever suits your fancy)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    68. Re:Yay by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I really love Ren & Stimpy :-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    69. Re:Yay by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      America's indigenous art forms have always had to go overseas in order to survive. Why do you think all the jazz musicians in the 40's and 50's had to move to Paris, or why Hendrix and The Ramones had to go to England to break out. Muddy Waters and Willie Dixon were practically destitute until the Rolling Stones took them on a European tour and exposed their music widely (to American audiences).

      You forgot Jerry Lewis, too.

    70. Re:Yay by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      H2 == Suburban

      H3 == Trailblazer

      Not pickups. Just other SUVs.

    71. Re:Yay by Chiindi · · Score: 1

      I got a Hummer in Hong Kong from Chinese Ho.

    72. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... there are a lot of jackasses around here who "need" a huge pickup truck that, once in the lifetime of the vehicle, actually gets used to carry anything that wouldn't have fit into a hatchback. Fucking morons.

    73. Re:Yay by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      1. If you don't mind me asking, what country? 2. Your sig puzzles me greatly, when seen in light of your post.

    74. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Escort was a great car because of CAFE standards. Because the standards was based on fleet average, automakers had to make good cheap small cars to lower the average while selling expensive guzzlers for big profits. Then the SUV problem hit. SUVs count as trucks, so they don't count in the car average. Over night all the cars like the Escort were gone. Congress could have fixed the law by counting SUVs as the passenger vehicles they are, but the craze had hit and people would have been upset.

    75. Re:Yay by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Define "great". I've always felt the H2s looked vaguely like an armored car with the top smashed down.

    76. Re:Yay by marklar1 · · Score: 1

      You were on the right track, but your point of reference is way off. Try something like this calculator which adjusts $$ for inflation:

      http://www.westegg.com/inflation/

      What cost $2800 in 1955 would cost $21457.27 in 2007.

      Also, if you were to buy exactly the same products in 2007 and 1955,
      they would cost you $2800 and $377.12 respectively.

      Or look for a CPI (consumer price index) calculator, like:

      http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

      which believes according to it's data that
      $
      in
      has the same buying power as
      $22,278.81
      in 2009

      So, corvettes have risen in price dramatically faster than the general "basket of goods" tracked by the CPI.

    77. Re:Yay by metlin · · Score: 1

      Some of us do outdoorsy activities a little more regularly than that - how does at least every other week (if not more often) sound?

      Besides, SUVs are highly utilitarian, and screw everything else - I like them for their sheer usefulness factor.

      For example, I just drove across all of New England for a move today - and for the umpteenth time, I realized just how useful my SUV was. Yes, it sounds cliched. And yes, I use the the public transportation, motorcycles & bicycles. Hell, I don't even drive my car during the workweek (since I fly every week for my job). But despite this, I love my SUV and wouldn't have it any other way.

    78. Re:Yay by Poppa · · Score: 1

      You are Clueless.

      The Chinese economy is dependent on the USA and will be for a long time. The last statistic I heard, was 1/4 container ships go to the US and 1/7 go to Walmart.

      Most of China is a 3rd world country that can't afford their own exports.

    79. Re:Yay by ksheff · · Score: 1

      That's nice, but I believe that song is from The Simpsons.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    80. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an ass.

      They lost an entire generation in WWI, fighting side-by-side with us. Even after losing a million boys, they provided a third of the force which ended the war.

      LaFayette, I swear that all Americans are not like this guy.

    81. Re:Yay by Reapman · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I must have missed it when the US started rounding up citizens because they follow a religion the State doesn't like, or blocking news sites like the BBC. I know it's really cool to beat up on how bad you Americans are, but I'm not aware of what makes China so damn great. When was the last time the US used tanks in a student rally?

      Last I heard you can stand in the street and bad mouth Bush or Obama. Try doing that in China....

    82. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will have to stand in a long line. Waiting for production from the new Chinese factory facilities secretly built will be many Chinese People's Army generals. You see, the buyer has only recently, conveniently huh?, been certified by the government of the Chinese People's Republic of China as a supplier to its military organs. Also you will have to wait in line behind the Taliban Militias and the buyers from Al Qaeda using US aid funds laundered through Saudi and other banks. With short supply lines from the new Chinese production facilities to western China frontier with Afghanistan and Taliban controlled Pakistan administered Kashmir, controlling resupply to the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan will be well nigh impossible. It will be the Ho Chi Minh Trail all over again as the new sanctuary for radical islam will operate from China all to make money. Oh!, that deal to produce the Hummer in the United States. That is only till 2010! Since the deal will only get signed and completed in the fall of 2009, and the other arrangements like transport of all machines for production to the new Chinese factory(ies) will probably take at least several months, the production in the USA promise is empty indeed. Indeed if US labor is used at all it will be to pack up the US factory equipment to ship it AND those worker's jobs to bambooland. And their futures. Of course here is the light side, the younger of those workers could volunteer for service in the armed forces to fight the new revamped armed forces of Talibania in Afghanistan, Pakistan, parts of Iran, Iraq.........all using thousands of Hummers newly minted and mounted with 47mm anti-tank guns, 12.7mm HMGs, etc, that will be swarming all over the place like ants. Oh, and Yes! The Guvernator will have to buy his parts with a 'Made BY China' label on them...and like it! ...and let's not forget North Korea. The new 'General Kim' might like ten thousand or so as well.

    83. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is my point of reference way off? Minimum wage figures are fact, which I gave you.
      http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774473.html

      The numbers I provided are accurate. You're simply taking another approach, which is a completely different method than mine.

      So, Corvettes have risen in price compared to other general goods. So what?

      Other general goods were once quality made in the US or Canada. Now they're mostly crap made in China with near-slave labour, so it's not surprising that the inflation-adjusted price has dropped.

      Then there's also the fact that the Corvette has moved somewhat upmarket since its introduction.
      It used to be the poor man's sports car. Now it's sport luxury.

      I'm sure if you did the same calculations with any car manufacturer and model that had been available for 54 consecutive years, you'll find the new ones are more expensive than their older counterparts.
      But that's not relevant to my argument.

    84. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence forth we shall be known as Terrans thank you very much! WE own and are the world!

      *ducks*

    85. Re:Yay by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      The Canadians would agree they're technically Americans, but they'd rather avoid the term and stick to being called Canadians. Same goes for the other countries.

      The last time I was in Canada (which was about 8 years ago,) people would get upset when you asked if they took "American" money and then explain that Canadian money was "American" money.

      That was in the British Columbia side. I guess the other provinces are different.

      And yes it was a petty nickpick. Since when is that a crime on slashdot? :)

    86. Re:Yay by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Think of the consequences, of an oppressive state, that willingly attacks anyone (esp. cyber attacks), blackmails its neighbours (over North Korea), and completely ignores any laws on copyright

      Sorry, could you specify whether you're referring to China, or the US. Hard to differentiate on those criteria. If you'd said "invades or bombs foreign countries on a whim", "kidnaps, imprisons and tortures nationals of any country without due process", I might have guessed.

      Sorry, couldn't resist that straight line.

      Maybe. But if you think the US really is the same, ask yourself why China tries to block half the the internet from it's people.

      You can bash the US government when you are online. Do you think if you were a Chinese citizen in China you would get away with being so pubic with you criticisms?

      And before the obvious responses, I not the one who began the comparison of China thread and I am not saying that being better than China in regards to liberty is worthwhile goal. (That sets the bar too low.)

    87. Re:Yay by longbot · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be caught dead on a Hyundai (hoon-dye, as I've been known to call them in parody).

      Imports are difficult to service yourself (in my experience, anyway). And parts cost at least twice as much.

      No one makes a car like mine anymore. At least not for the US market. And especially not domestic car companies.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    88. Re:Yay by longbot · · Score: 1

      It really was. Great and cheap. Okay, so you couldn't drive it 400,000 miles unless you took anal-retentively good care of it (though I've seen one that did make it to 416k) but it only cost about $10k new. What does that get you now?

      You've really hit the nail on the head. This is exactly why GM is dying. Gas hit $4/gal, and all the people like me that want a small utility vehicle already had them from 10 years ago.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    89. Re:Yay by longbot · · Score: 1

      You really need that 4-8 cubic feet more than a wagon offers? I recall reading specs for my friend's Saturn Vue, and finding out that he got 19MPG and I got 31MPG. He also had 7 more cubic feet of cargo capacity.

      It's your money for the gas, dude. But when you cry when gas is $6.50 a gallon and I'm still putting along, I'm going to laugh at you.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    90. Re:Yay by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "American Culture: Made in China"

      Poser Crap, made in China.

      The HMMWV is a military truck, while the "Hummer" is for people too stupid to know the difference between a military truck and a Tahoe in drag.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    91. Re:Yay by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      aybe. But if you think the US really is the same,

      No, I don't. But can you say the US has lived up to its principles, this last decade? America has lost its moral high ground. You can't sneer at other countries for their abuses without expecting your own to come up. Doesn't excuse, say China's actions in Tibet, but it makes it much easier for China to blow you off if you try to raise the subject.

    92. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, maybe some people in quebec might not call themselves Canadians? ;)

    93. Re:Yay by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      1. New Zealand

      2. Why is extolling the positive virtues of where one lives (even if not their first choice of places) a bad thing?

    94. Re:Yay by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I'm paddling almost every weekend. Riding singletrack every other day.

      Yes, public transporation is a great thing. No, it doesn't solve all problems. Especially if you don't live in a city or have hobbies that require you to carry a bit more than what will fit on your back, or require you to go quite a distance to get to the nearest treeline (just think if we didn't have so much urbanization, many of us wouldn't need to drive so much just to play in the woods).

    95. Re:Yay by metlin · · Score: 1

      That extra space comes in *really* handy when you're trying to buy furniture, move kayaks, bicycles, pack plants and transport pets + people.

      Do I do it every day? No. But it definitely beats the inconvenience of having to rent every time I need a bigger car.

  3. 5,013? by Mex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who are these 5,013 douchebags still buying Hummers? =P

    1. Re:5,013? by Alethes · · Score: 1

      Because they can't get them for free.

    2. Re:5,013? by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's worldwide. They're popular in the middle east and africa for sheiks and dictators.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:5,013? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      A company close to where I work will rent you a stretched version, a bit like a limo. Recently somebody (possibly the same company) tried to avoid an import tax on luxury cars by designating their hummers as buses.

    4. Re:5,013? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between who and why.

    5. Re:5,013? by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some people actually need a vehicle with more than 12 " ground clearance. Hopefully the H2 delivers this. The H3, OTOH, is a completely inappropriate tool for most anything. For status, get an Escalade. For function, get an H2. For panache, get a Caterpillar.

      Mind you, my wife would buy an H1 if she could afford it. And she thinks a Core 2 Duo with a 20" monitor is excessive...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:5,013? by Abreu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here in Mexico City, driving a Hummer is considered an admission of being a drug-dealer or a politician (or both, if you know what I mean...)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    7. Re:5,013? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Actually most of the back roads around here are too narrow for a Hummer. Having a 7' width isn't very practical, even if a 12" clearance it.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    8. Re:5,013? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find it hilarious that you're defending an H2 as a serious offroad vehicle instead of a fullsize chevy with a body kit. If you need 12" clearance, get a pickup and lift it a bit. At least you can get them in diesel.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:5,013? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Informative

      A company close to where I work will rent you a stretched version, a bit like a limo.

      The company that imported them into the UK has apparently stopped doing it, after one *fell apart* going over a bump. The normal chassis is barely up to the job, and splicing in an extra metre doesn't help.

    10. Re:5,013? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      That's worldwide. They're popular in the middle east and africa for sheiks and dictators.

      My understanding was that the H1 is only sold as a "fleet" vehicle nowadays.
      In other words, for commercial use.
      /But details like that aren't important for sheiks and dictators.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    11. Re:5,013? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      H2 is a piece of junk. If you want something that's good offroad, then do yourself a favour and buy a Jeep. Even the lowliest Wrangler will handle better offroad than an H2, and it'll cost a fraction of what you'd spend for the Hummer.

      Or if you don't like Jeep, then Suzuki makes some nice and good offroad vehicles, as does Toyota, and if you want a status symbol, buy a Land Rover. Any of the above will be better offroad than an H2, and with the exception of the Land Rover, they'll all cost significantly less than the Hummer.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    12. Re:5,013? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      For panache, get a Caterpillar.

      I most wholeheartedly concur!

      As for people who "need more than a foot of ground clearance", they should buy a serious offroader. The original Hummer (before it got pussified into an SUV) qualifies. Otherwise get a Land Cruiser or a Jeep or something.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    13. Re:5,013? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah calling a Hummer an off roader is pretty funny. You would think here in AR, land of the redneck, there would be plenty of those fugly things, but the only ones you ever see are being driven by doctors who not only never go off road but would have a coronary if they even got them dirty. The off roaders and the rest of us just laugh at those things and make "sorry about your penis" jokes.

      Here it is the F150, the Ram and the Ranger. The Vulcan V6 Rangers actually are very popular for the off roaders here. They are light enough they rarely get stuck and have plenty of power and the cast iron V6 is tough as hell. I know I wouldn't give up my Vulcan Ranger for one of those sissy new Hummers if you paid me. The new ones look like a soccer mom ride, not a mud slinger.

      I say let the Chinese have the damned things. Those things just don't compare to a well built Ford or Dodge truck. The only Hummers I ever see are being driven by doctors and lawyers who are afraid of scratching the paint, about like those Lincoln Navigators being driven by their wives. Why anybody would want a vehicle that sucked that much gas and cost so much they were afraid to really get anything done in it more than carrying groceries is beyond me. Good riddance.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:5,013? by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Victoria Police bought some. You sure do need something like that to traverse the streets of Melbourne.

    15. Re:5,013? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      If you really need a rock crawler or offroad vehicle, recycle an old Jeep Wagoneer. One of the 80s-90s models are tough to kill, reasonably reliable, and probably easier to keep up the an International or a Jimmy. Swap out the rectangular headlights for the round ones, rip out all the screwed up wiring, replace the radiator on sight, and of course solve the many suspension problems, and you'll have it for 10 years or until you can't get a thermostat or distributor cap that fits.

      Me? My Explorer has 287k on it, but I'm afraid to put in in 4WD. Something would go B A N G.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    16. Re:5,013? by lavalamp70 · · Score: 1

      and dickheads worldwide....

    17. Re:5,013? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah calling a Hummer an off roader is pretty funny.

      It's nothing more than a marketing trick based on association with the military HMMWV, which worked brilliantly. The humvee is a vehicle to make its predecessor jeep proud. It has an angled independent suspension that puts the gear box, drive shaft and other parts well off the ground for huge clearance. It's a great off-road vehicle, reliable and rugged.

      Civilian versions are nothing like that, since they're based off completely different chassis. But hey, they look pretty similar if and if you never take them off the road you probably won't even notice. So it's kinda like you own military hardware! How bad-ass!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:5,013? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      A Honda CRV has 7.2 inches of ground clearance, that's nothing to sneeze at. The H2 and H3 largely get their ground clearance from their large rim/tire combination. Slap some 20's (up from the stock 15" rims) and a slightly higher profile tire and you have more ground clearance than a Hummer... getting 25mpg city to boot!
       
      Throw some 15" rims and traditionally proportioned tires on a Hummer and it has pretty average ground clearance.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    19. Re:5,013? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      When you slap the 20s on your CR-V, where does the center of gravity end up?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    20. Re:5,013? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Probably about where it is on an H2 or H3. Are you supporting my point or attacking it; I can't tell.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:5,013? by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody actually needs a vehicle with that much clearance. I lived at the end of a 12 mile county dirt road in Oregon, in an area with essentially no public services in the winter, and we would routinely get 5-6" snowstorms, sometimes up to three or four feet. What vehicle did we drive most? A Chrysler van with about 3-4" of clearance when it was loaded. And it was just fine.

      My parents run a land surveying company in a small town in Western Colorado, which routinely requires us to drive off-road, all their vehicles have about 9-12" clearance. I own a '95 4Runner which has a ground clearance of about 11" with everything standard. I actually drive mine off-road in some interesting terrain and even in bad conditions or climbing up rocky mountain roads 12" of ground clearance is *never* required. The only people that need that much clearance are rock crawlers, and they aren't going to buy an H2.

      And this isn't even taking into account the fact that 95% of SUV's never even leave paved road surfaces, let alone go off road. Most SUV owners are just stupid people that like to drive unnecessarily (and dangerously) large vehicles, because of status and misperceived safety.

    22. Re:5,013? by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      Just curious: why swap out the rectangular headlights for round ones?

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    23. Re:5,013? by adavies42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Civilian versions are nothing like that, since they're based off completely different chassis.

      h2 and h3, yes. the "h1", which was just "hummer" prior to the introduction of the 2 and 3, is pretty much a real humvee minus the .50-cal that goes in the middle. i imagine it'd make an awesome off-roader, though i've never bothered looking up any stats.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    24. Re:5,013? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It's nothing more than a marketing trick based on association with the military HMMWV, which worked brilliantly. The humvee is a vehicle to make its predecessor jeep proud. It has an angled independent suspension that puts the gear box, drive shaft and other parts well off the ground for huge clearance. It's a great off-road vehicle, reliable and rugged.

      It also leaks oil like crazy and spends more time in the maintenance than offroad.
      Unimog is a much better alternative.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    25. Re:5,013? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who?

    26. Re:5,013? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Here in Miami, it is a sign that you work with Horatio Cane.....

    27. Re:5,013? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Probably doesn't leave the driveway, since you'd need a lift kit in order to get the wheels to turn.

    28. Re:5,013? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      round ones for a jeep are easier to get. :) There's been far more jeeps made with round headlights than square ones.

      it's the same logic that suggests that you should replace the air suspension in a Subaru XT or XT6 with coils from a Loyale... while you'll lose the ability the XT6 has to drop its ground clearance to 4" (from 8") at speeds over 60mph, you get rid of a system that's finicky and hard to keep maintained, and you greatly increase the pool of available parts to fix it: over its entire 6-year run, only 811 XT6's ever made it to Canada, versus that many loyales, per month, over the same time period. The ratios are about the same in the US, too.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    29. Re:5,013? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >So it's kinda like you own military hardware! How bad-ass!

      But for about $14,000 -- far, far less than the cost of a new Hummer and lower than most used Hummers -- you can buy a Pinzgauer that *is* actually old military hardware and is *vastly* more capable than any civilian Hummer out there. I have several friends that own them; one is back from Afghanistan and claims that US Special Forces there tend to use Pinzgauers over HMMWV's because they have better ground clearance and performance. Not as good if you're getting shot at, coz the HMMWV's have retrofit armor, but hopefully most civilians who have wanna-be military dreams aren't getting shot at.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    30. Re:5,013? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      It's a great off-road vehicle, reliable and rugged.

      Not if you are my brother. In the army he blew up 3. Literally. Fire and all. Without enemy interference. One was a prototype. Another one he almost dropped off of a mountain side...

    31. Re:5,013? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      You raise the ground clearance like that plus the bigger tires and you will not get 25 MPG. Doing that you will get the same crappy MPG the other SUVs get. That is if the axles don't snap when you drive. The CRV is really a FWD car with a bigger body on it. The rear axle is not the main drive axle. It is used when the car computer thinks it needs it. Replace the axles to support the bigger tires and your MPG drops more.

    32. Re:5,013? by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. Thanks!

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    33. Re:5,013? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Would your brother perchance be Captain Clutz? Or perhaps Major Catastrophe? At least I hope that's the case. I'd rather not think that unbeknownst to most of us the humvee was the Ford Pinto of the modern military. But hey I bet most of them don't drive off mountains on their own. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    34. Re:5,013? by zx-15 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem with Pinzgauer, is that it doesn't have cup holders. Why would anyone want military hardware if it doesn't have cup holders?

    35. Re:5,013? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Your MPG isn't going to be affected significantly by the weight of the rims/tires - that's like driving with a passenger. Your acceleration will be hurt slightly due to the changed ratio but your mileage should actually go UP slightly. If you break an axle on your daily driver You're Doing It Wrong. The forces placed on an axle with a 20" rim on it vs a 15" rim is far less than the design spec of surviving a panic stop. Unless you're rock cimbing in the outback of Moab, UT this shouldn't be a problem, and even then you'd pick a proper vehicle for the job like a jeep (rentals available within 5 miles of the trailhead) and leave the toy behind.
       
      For the price difference between the CRV and a H2 you could completely replace the drive train/suspension with one far superior to the H2's and still have money left over to pay for the gas for it for a year (what else could you buy for the $20,000 price difference? The downpayment on a condo closer to your office, for starters).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    36. Re:5,013? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Your MPG isn't going to be affected significantly by the weight of the rims/tires - that's like driving with a passenger. Your acceleration will be hurt slightly due to the changed ratio but your mileage should actually go UP slightly. If you break an axle on your daily driver You're Doing It Wrong. The forces placed on an axle with a 20" rim on it vs a 15" rim is far less than the design spec of surviving a panic stop. Unless you're rock cimbing in the outback of Moab, UT this shouldn't be a problem, and even then you'd pick a proper vehicle for the job like a jeep (rentals available within 5 miles of the trailhead) and leave the toy behind.
       
      For the price difference between the CRV and a H2 you could completely replace the drive train/suspension with one far superior to the H2's and still have money left over to pay for the gas for it for a year (what else could you buy for the for the $20,000 price difference? The downpayment on a condo closer to your office, for starters).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    37. Re:5,013? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      As one of my friends is fond of saying, about his Unimog: "all the creature comforts! If it's too hot, you just turn on the air conditioning! Owait no air conditioning, so instead you just roll down the windows! Owait no windows... well, drive faster."

      What'd be cool is if they had gimbal cup holders so when you're using that 45 degree climbing ability you don't spill your drink. I'll suggest that.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    38. Re:5,013? by Ninja09 · · Score: 1

      Not as good if you're getting shot at, coz the HMMWV's have retrofit armor, but hopefully most civilians who have wanna-be military dreams aren't getting shot at.

      ...unless you are in Detroit.

  4. So, who makes HumVees? by alphakappa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are they simply licensing the brand and making completely different vehicles to Military Specs?

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    1. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're taking over the production lines too.

    2. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Military Humvees are made by AM General, who sold the rights to the civilian versions back in 99 to GM I believe. This won't affect the military production lines in Indiana.

    3. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are they simply licensing the brand and making completely different vehicles to Military Specs?

      From what I'm told, AM General makes the HumVee, which for the original Hummer, was sold to GM as-is (well, a stripped down version anyhow). GM then painted them, added luxuries and such and then sold them to the public. That's why the H2 and H3 were so different compared to the original H1 - GM does not own the design of the H1 at all - they merely resold the hardware after some modifications. The H2 and H3 were original GM designs.

      So no, the Chinese are not getting military information out of it, other than perhaps how to add leather seats and cupholders to an existing H1.

    4. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      The military (humvee) units are manufactured by AM General in Indiana. They sold the brand name to GM, who's now reselling it. The vehicles are built in Louisiana (?) (for the US) and South Africa (worldwide exports). Those plants will continue manufacturing them for at least another year. Maybe not the US one... I think most people who would buy a hummer would refuse to buy a chi-com hummer.

      Anyhow, it's basically a name and a grill design.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by johndiii · · Score: 1

      No, the HumVees were the originals. A Hummer is just a big, heavy HumVee-style body on an SUV chassis. At least, that's what they are now. The H1 was closer to the military version. Hummer on Wikipedia.

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
    6. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a license deal along with the distribution, dealer support network and trademark/design rights for civilian vehicles.

      AM General corporation [www.amgeneral.com], a privately held company, builds the HMMWV and other military vehicles [LSSV], as well as the H2 under contract to GM.

      GM builds the H3 in Louisiana with a plant developed in conjunction with Isuzu.

      The deal partners AM General with Sichuan providing the financing for future models and expanding sales overseas.

      AM General is not being sold.

      I'm a h1 owner [98 diesel HMCO] and it's a common misconception for a long time that GM builds the hummer/humvee when in reality they contract it out. The H3 is the only product that GM mades directly.

      That being said, they stated in the dealer memo that went out today, they were planning on focusing on the future hx/h3 lines including a non crew cab version of the H3T as well as diesel versions.

      That being said, I'm surprised it's mentioned on Slashdot.

    7. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Hummer H2 is a Chevy Tahoe with a lift, air lockers, and a nominal performance increase. The Hummer H3 is a newer, more lightweight vehicle, purpose-built or perhaps based on some other SUV, I'm not sure.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget the other modifications from the Tahoe. You know, the extra weight, woeful aerodynamics and awful use of interior space. It's kind of like an inverse-Tardis, it's smaller on the inside than it looks on the outside.

    9. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by fast+turtle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Neither. The military versions are called HMMV, which people tend to sound as HumVee. The GM product is called H1/H2/H3 Hummer and is based upon the Chevy Suburban Platform. Mainly the entire division is a marketing drone's wet dream as the best Mileage I've seen listed for the Hummer was 12MPG on the highway. Simply put, what killed the division is the low mileage and fuel guzzler tax here in the states because the vehicles simply couldn't get any mileage at all unlike the Real HMMV, that avgs. 20+mpg and the engine is a true multi-fuel capable. Primary is diesel but it will run on damn near anything including gasoline, ethonal and even what American's fondly call beer.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    10. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The military (humvee) units are manufactured by AM General in Indiana. They sold the brand name to GM, who's now reselling it. The vehicles are built in Louisiana (?) (for the US) and South Africa (worldwide exports).

      The H1 was built by AM General, who makes the military HMMWV on which the H1 is based. Of the current models, the H2 is built by AM General under contract from GM (its a GM design, based on the same platform as the Yukon and Tahoe) in Indiana. The H3 (based on a different GM platform) is built in Louisiana and South Africa as you describe.

    11. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1 is the one that is based on the military model and shares many of the same parts. It was made by AM General (the builder of the military HMMWV) who sold the marketing and distribution off the GM. They stopped making the H1s in 2006.

      GM then designed the H2 and contracted AM General to build it.

      The H3 is all GM.

      Aside from the price tag, the H2 and H3 aren't based on military vehicles.

      Aside from the price tag, H2 and H3 aren't based off of the military at all.

    12. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H2 and H3 were original GM designs.

      Original? Ha. The H2 is a rebadged Tahoe with different sheet metal.

      I never understood the H2 & H3. Despite its impracticality in regular traffic, the H1 is an awesome off-road machine. The H2 & H3 are POSes off-road.

      If you want a Hummer, get a real Hummer. Or get a poser SUV.

    13. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Informative

      The H2 and H2 are HMMV-styled bodies on standard GMC truck frames and running gear.

    14. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      AM General licensed the manufacture of civilian version of the Hummer to GM. The Hummer you buy is actually a Suburban with a HMMWV shaped body on top. AM General High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle -M998 Truck has different design specs for the military vehicle. Here is some history about this:
      http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/hmmwv-hummer.htm

    15. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      The H2 and H3 are HMMV-styled bodies on standard GMC truck frames and running gear.

      Fixed it for you.

      But really, should we expect anything more from GM? As you say, "standard ... truck frames."

    16. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      GM doesn't have any purpose built chassis any more. Not even the Corvette. The H3 probably shares it's chassis with the Equinox or similar (a wild ass guess)

    17. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      HMMWV, actually. High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle.

    18. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by PPH · · Score: 1

      HumVees (HMMWVs) are made by AM General. They sold the distribution rights of the civilian version, the H1 Hummer to GM. GM based the H2 and H3 Hummers on other civilian vehicle chassis. The H2/H3 vehicles share no mechanical systems or production facilities with the HMMWV.

      Personnaly, I'd rather have a MegaCrusier than any of these.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    19. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Hilarious citation for you re: H2 POS off-road. Hilarious if you aren't driving it.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    20. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What about the H2?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      Thank heavens!

      If China invaded Taiwan and the US responded... I was worried that China would sue the US to keep those Hummers off the battlefield!

    22. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      The H3 chassis is similar to (though not identical) a Blazer or an Envoy.

    23. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Hang on. People are seriously suggesting that the Chinese can learn something from a thing that is pretty well a 1940s British Leyland reject with worse construction than if the Yugoslavian state washing machine company was building them in the 1960s? Unless it's a plot to reduce the quality of Chinese motor vehicles even furthur.

      A Hummer is a badge - it says to all "I'm rich and so is my mechanic."

    24. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by British · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I noticed sitting inside an H2. There really is no cargo space in it, unless you want to put your stuff on the seats. You would think a big cube-shaped SUV that's ultra-wide would have plenty of comfort & personal space for passengers. It doesn't. The driver & front passenger are enveloped by consoles, etc. Behind the rear passengers doesn't make for much cargo room whatsoever. It's like it was designed for people who don't want to sit near each other and are giving each other the silent treatment.

    25. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      even what American's fondly call beer.

      I'll have you know, America produce quite a bit of very good beer. Show up in seattle and I'll introduce you to some.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by adminstring · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are referring to Land Rover, which is currently owned by India's Tata Motors. Today's Hummer is just a Chevy truck with different styling, and modern Chevy trucks don't have serious problems with quality. Land Rover, on the other hand, was constantly at the bottom of Consumer Reports' list for reliability.

      You are right that the Chinese don't have much to learn from Hummer, though... you can walk into most auto parts stores today and buy Chinese replacement parts for any American car or truck. It wouldn't be much of a leap for them to start putting those parts together in China to make a whole car or truck, and indeed GM has recently been contemplating importing Chinese-made economy cars to the US within a few years.

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
    27. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Warshadow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dunno about the H2, but the H3 is *not* the same frame as the Colorado and Canyon that are built in the plant in Shreveport. It's quite a bit beefier that the frame used in the Colorado and Canyon.

      Unless I wanted a vehicle for off-roading, I wouldn't buy one and I used to build the damned things. The gas mileage is horrifying and hello wind noise because of the nearly vertical windshield. Never mind the anemic I-5 they put in most of them. They started putting a small V-8 in them after I left GM, but that adds way too much to the price.

    28. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and this is a key value to this transaction.

      Effectively, while the Chinese company "bought Hummer", a side effect is that they bought a copy of the GM Light Truck line.

      Say what you will about GM, they make very good trucks. So, as a technology transfer, this company bought a very modern truck platform and some fine engine technology. May not be good for Mom and Pop commuter, but if they were interested in getting a modern Light Truck (vs some vanity brand name), this couldn't have been a better purchase.

    29. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Current Hummers have absolutely nothing in common with Humvees except for general similarity in styling/look (plus made appropriately shitty by chrome/etc. for general consumption)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    30. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      While GM doesn't produce the H2 directly, it's still their design and based off of GM truck chassis. All AM General does it build it for them...

    31. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Informative

      H2 = GMC Jimmy AKA Chevy Tahoe chassis
      H3 = GMC Envoy AKA Chevy Trailblazer chassis

    32. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H3 is based on a Chevy Colorado frame. That's their light pickup. And... they're vehicles for people who feel like having a military styled vehicle makes them "safer" or "more patriotic". I really REALLY don't understand Hummer customers.

    33. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know, America produce quite a bit of very good beer. Show up in seattle and I'll introduce you to some.

      Shhh. He still thinks everything Americans make is crap, Jappanese cars last 10 times longer, and European production is "higher quality."

      If we stay quiet, he might think that Apple Computer is about to go under, the Soviet Union is a real threat, and IBM is where all computers are made.

    34. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction!

      H2=GMT800 Tahoe, Yukon, Esclade
      H3=GMT345 which is very simular to a Colorado/Canyon

    35. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Animats · · Score: 1

      From what I'm told, AM General [amgeneral.com] makes the HumVee, which for the original Hummer, was sold to GM as-is (well, a stripped down version anyhow). GM then painted them, added luxuries and such and then sold them to the public.

      There were some engineering changes. For example, the original HMMWV had a top speed of 54MPH. (The military didn't buy those things to drive them on freeways.) The civilian version has a completely different transmission so it can go faster. Here's the full list of differences. A few of the civilian features, like air conditioning, were backported to the HMMWV for ambulance and other enclosed applications.

      The H2/H3/H4, of course, are based on ordinary GMC platforms.

    36. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H2 = GMC Jimmy AKA Chevy Tahoe chassis
      H3 = GMC Envoy AKA Chevy Trailblazer chassis

      The H3 is actually on the Colorado / Canyon chassis.

    37. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>You are right that the Chinese don't have much to learn from Hummer, though... you can walk into most auto parts stores today and buy Chinese replacement parts for any American car or truck.

      The "Chinese" aren't a monolithic block. This specific company according to the article has never made cars and buying the hummer would give them the know how in producing cars.

    38. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      even what American's fondly call beer.

      What, are you saying that there's a car that runs on water?

    39. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I really REALLY don't understand Hummer customers.

      Hummer owners are fundamentally the same as Prius owners; they have made a retarded purchasing decision in order to achieve some goal. Restoring and upgrading a classic 4x4 (like a Land Cruiser, Land Rover, Scout, '70s K5 Blazer, '60s Power Wagon, etc.) would produce better, cheaper, classier results than buying the H2. Restoring one of the finer econoboxes (e.g. 240SX, Civic Si, Corolla AE86) would produce better, cheaper, classier, and indeed more environmentally friendly results than buying a Prius. Saving cars from the crusher prevents the production of cars; all of these vehicles get or can be coaxed to get 30 mpg freeway, and the price differential will buy you a lot of fuel. The energy new vehicles are produced with is primarily based on fossil fuels, and much of it is oil anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1 is the original military hummer, the h2 is based on the suburban, hopefully China doesn't get the military contract along with the company.

    41. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by whipnet · · Score: 1

      The H2 is actually sitting on a Suburban frame, not Tahoe. *

    42. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H2 = GMC Jimmy AKA Chevy Tahoe chassis
      H3 = GMC Envoy AKA Chevy Trailblazer chassis

      Not quite. The H3 is based on the Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon platform, not the Trailblazer.

    43. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMC Jimmy = Chevy Blazer
      GMC Yukon = Chevy Tahoe

      I can see how a lack of distinct branding hurt GM.

    44. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      "Hummer owners are fundamentally the same as Prius owners; they have made a retarded purchasing decision in order to achieve some goal."
      Brilliant! I love it.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    45. Re:So, who makes HumVees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H3 chassis is similar to (though not identical) a Blazer or an Envoy.

      It's based very closely on the Colorado/Canyon platform, not the Trailblazer/Envoy.

  5. Maybe it's just me... by Tet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... but news for nerds? I'm not seeing it.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for Henry Rollins?

      Let's all get offroad tattoos in honour of this day!

    2. Re:Maybe it's just me... by royallthefourth · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not news for nerds, but it is stuff that matters (to Americans). Things like Hummers make it hard to show pride in my country. At least now we can legitimately shift a bit of the blame on someone else.

    3. Re:Maybe it's just me... by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you cry into a beer, at least you have a beer.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Maybe it's just me... by lothos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to see news for nerds, go to the firehose and vote up what you want to see.

      I have a story in the firehose: .org now signed for dnssec

    5. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most nerds have little in the way of physical endowment, and therefore must compensate.
       
      Hummers are the method of choice of compensating for small penises.
       
      Therefore, for some, this is most certainly news for nerds.

    6. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've never met a nerd who wasn't interested in Chinese hummers.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most nerds have little in the way of physical endowment, and therefore must compensate.

      Hummers are the method of choice of compensating for small penises.

      So does that mean if I'm a nerd with a nice 8 inches, I can drive a moped and still be cool?

      Well...fuck it. I drive an Impala....

    8. Re:Maybe it's just me... by conejo+especial · · Score: 1

      ... but news for nerds? I'm not seeing it.

      Call me naive, but as I see it the interesting part of this community is the community response - opinion, insight, bullshit, etc. The "news" is less interesting than what people have to say about it.

  6. Swings and roundabouts . . . by siloko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Save Jobs, Fuck The Planet! The motto of the new depression. Roll up, Roll up, get your tickets here for the latest 'End of the World' show!

    1. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Save Jobs, Fuck The Planet! The motto of the new depression.

      Still employed eh?

      This Hummer deal makes sense to me. The Chinese aren't among those nations actively reducing their own standard of living to Save the Planet (tm). Just the opposite, in fact. Hummers will be effectively illegal in the US inside of 5 years. It's just being moved to where the market is permitted to exist.

      Expect the pace of heavy industry evacuation from the US to accelerate. Those that can't be taken over and sold off by their unions (Chrysler and GM) will chased out with card check, cap and trade, etc.

      Write back siloko; tell me all about it using your Chinese keyboard, and mouse, batteries, LCD displays and chair. Or perhaps you're using a Chinese made laptop?

    2. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      +5 Painful, painful truth.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    3. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Save Jobs, Fuck The Planet!

      Jobs are what people use to earn a living, to keep themselves alive without stealing. Apparently you object to this.
      Only rich countries can afford to be concerned about the "environment". Others are more concerned about staying alive, regardless of the cosequences.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Agreed. +5 I've been watching for years now as you can't even buy a screw made in the US anymore. The big question is going to be when will China stop accepting our IOU's for real stuff? I expect that cliff is going to make the housing bubble look like the good old days.

    5. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I thought I was supposed to roll up for the Magical Mystery Tour, not the End of the World As We Know It.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Swings and roundabouts . . . by sethstorm · · Score: 1


      The Chinese aren't among those nations actively reducing their own standard of living

      Well, you cant get any worse than their form of slave labor.

      That nation has no record of improving, just poorly copying off of others.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  7. They want the tech by timpdx · · Score: 1

    They want the technology of building a large automobile & other auto-related technology and practices. They are getting it pretty cheap.

    1. Re:They want the tech by forgoodmeasure · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure what they want, but they are getting the tech, the brand, the manufacturing plant and let's not forget the distribution network.

      The buyer, Sichuan Tengzhong, looks like an interesting company. They manufacture heavy equipment, special-use vehicles, highway & bridge structural components, construction machinery and energy facilities. That's a varied mix, but I don't see passenger autos in there. They've been in business since 2005. They are a private company; I'm not sure where they get their funding or their origins.

      http://www.mahalo.com/Sichuan_Tengzhong#guide_note-Official-1

  8. Are they going to still be sold here? by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if anyone will buy Saab now, it has had worse sales than Hummer for a long time.

    http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/02/by-the-numbers-may-2009-gm-and-ford-surprise-edition/

    The above link has some sales data.

    The real problem isn't that Hummer is sold, it is that the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler have both been shoved down the companies and investor's throats. So they will trot out that they saved 3,000 or so jobs. What about the 100,000 plus jobs lost when all the dealerships are being forced to close, even ones who make a profit? A considerable number, if not the majority, of dealerships being punted are profitable.

    This is all about Wall Street and not Main Street. The people tasked with doing these close outs and sales are all Wall Street regulars. If Wall Street had been held to the same standards as Detroit the change might have been something I could believe in. Instead communities are going to face real problems when dealerships close. Yeah, 3000 jobs is nice but it is a nickle on a Cadillac in terms of loss/gain. In other words, who the flip cares?

    Hummer. Funny thing is they will survive in the real world and not the alternate reality world the US has become.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "bankruptcy" is really just a wealth (for lack of a better word) transfer. And by transfer, I mean theft. Contract law was ignored when deciding what secured debt holders deserved. Tim Geithner's hand is shoved up the banks, GM, and Chrysler like a ventriloquist dummy, so they can do nothing but nod their heads. Not that the banks mind too much -- the revolving door between treasury, federal reserve, and the investment banks looks like a bukake session with you and i in the middle.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Investors and companies should be happy that GM didn't completely shut down and liquidate 6 months ago, yielding no profits on those precious investments.

      GM's failure has been coming for decades. The writing has been on the wall for years. GM's 2007 profits were still poor, even before this recession. Most of GM's cars are poor quality, but GM has been doing better in recent years.

      It's pretty clear that GM was over expanding when it bought Hummer, Saab and Saturn. It's pretty clear that the Saturn product turned to crap after GM bought Saturn. It's pretty clear that many GM's cars were among the lowest rated cars according to several automotive magazines. Investors and dealerships should have complained louder when they had the chance.

      I'll look forward to the day if and when GM pays off it's US government funded bridge loan. GM has potential.

    3. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is, with less profitable dealerships comes less exposure, and less people buying GM in the long term, which will lead to less dealerships......

    4. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erhm.. worse sales != greater loses
      Just because they are selling even less has nothing to do with their ability to cope with it.

    5. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      And the alternative is????

      I mean seriously, who in their right freaken mind would ever buy any of the assets from GM? Oh gee, 1 used car manufacturing plant building outdated vehicles! Yeah that will work REALLY well.

      While I agree that there is contract law it does not matter squat if thousands of people get unemployed, the economy collapses, etc. And as a matter of fact contract law was not ignored. What happened is that a majority of people agreed with the terms and a small minority disagreed! In fact I could argue whatever happened to majority shareholder decisions? BTW the bankruptcy judge seems to have agreed with Chrysler.

      Let's get real with the Indiana pension funds it was a scam to raise dirt even though they would loose very little in the overall scheme of things. They just wanted to whine and scream and score political points. It was never an intellectual discussion.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    6. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm glad you feel that way. You see, we had a vote and the majority of us decided you should be our toilet slave. I'm sure you'll whine and scream, but it'll help the economy.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem isn't that Hummer is sold, it is that the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler have both been shoved down the companies and investor's throats.

      My impression was that the federal government went to great lengths to help GM and Chrysler avoid bankruptcy (by, at least indirectly, ponying up substantial amounts of tax payer dollars) and then when it finally became clear that bankruptcy was unavoidable the federal government has bent over backwards to expedite the bankruptcy process.

      If anything, the federal government has been way too soft on GM and Chrysler; providing them with preferential treatment unavailable to individuals and small businesses. In a purely capitalist economy GM and Chrysler would have gone bankrupt long ago.

    8. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      GM didn't buy Saturn. It was developed as a GM subsidiary from the start. The Hummer deal also wasn't bad for a while, from a business perspective.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    9. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am glad someone here has caught on.

      We have a Democrat Congress and a Democrat President effecting the largest transfer of public money into privates even seen. Seeing this I really wish one side or the other was controlled by the other party. We have no one to check the government with the press still infatuated with Obama, let alone with the tone of his wife's arms.

      A cult of personality is being exploited by the White House (read up on it, they are use word analyst and such to direct outrage where they want it) and who is out there to call them on it? Rush? If that is all we have to get the word out what chance is there?

    10. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Ozlanthos · · Score: 1

      Uh...Um....duh? Doesn't take a lawyer to understand a common theft when they see one. The first clue to me that it was a straight out theft was when i started hearing about exactly how much dough we are talking about. As soon as congress is informed of "how much a project will cost", the first thing that goes through their minds is "How do I "misappropriate" me some of that!" The second clue to me was when I started hearing things like "fast-tracked through Congress", "minimal over-sight for disbursment of funds", And lastly, that the dude in charge of handing it over to the banks was a guy named Neil Kashkari.....need I say more?

      -Oz

    11. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by fermion · · Score: 1
      SAAB has a history of real safety. Many consumers have not been traditionally very concerned about the reliability problem. SAAB does not really down sell.

      Hummer is simply an effecient way to kill families of four in smaller cars, as well as slowly killing the rest of us. Hummer does down sell, as with the H3. The H1 was a special vehicle in that it was large enough to not have follow pollution control standards that most cars do have to follow. Everyone complians about pollution control standards, but think about. You have toilet in your house, don't you? And pay plumbers. I mean, you don't have to have this expense. You could just crap in your neighbors yard, but you don't. And yet somehow we complain about catalytic converters and the cost of the emission control systems.

      The H1 was special in another way. It was big enough to be taken off taxes in one big swoop, not over time. Need to reduce you tax liability. But an h1. Take it off your bogus lawnmower or antique bussinesss. The taxpayer has now bought you a car.

      Again the problem with Hummer is that it was actively sold to people who could not really afford it. The economy allowed those people to buy it, and pay for gas, but now the magic house bank account is gone. Reports from everywhere say no one is buying these.

      The good news is the chinese restrictions on cars to do apply to foreign made vehicles, so Hummer is likely not going to made in china. But the chinese do not have to pay the executive salaries that have been the main means of killin the car company, and can control costs in other ways, so they may be able to sell enough of these vehicles to turn a profit. No possible with American car companies who seem to think they are in the real estate business rather than the car business.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The real problem isn't that Hummer is sold, it is that the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler have both been shoved down the companies and investor's throats

      Yes. By bondholders. GM and Chrysler simply could not pay all their debt obligations, and had no way to grow enough to do so in a year's time. So, they had two choices: get their creditors to renegotiate, or declare bankruptcy.

      If Wall Street had been held to the same standards as Detroit the change might have been something I could believe in

      Change? How about the White House giving American auto-manufacturers the same deal that banks have had since the great depression? Pretty smooth, if you ask me.

      Hummer. Funny thing is they will survive in the real world and not the alternate reality world the US has become.

      Hummer is a product of GM. For all intents and purposes, GM "died" yesterday.

      Talking about Hummer "surviving" after GM's bankruptcy is like talking about how Big Mac could "survive" McDonald's bankrupcty.

    13. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean seriously, who in their right freaken mind would ever buy any of the assets from GM?

      Well, this Chinesse company, for one...

      And anyone who can read a report on GM's actual assets. If Clinton had gotten first-world healthcare for the United States when he tried. GM would be as solid today as friggin' Microsoft. And if GM could have waved a magic wand and lost its retiree debt, we might have flying cars by now.

    14. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Hummer is surviving because of the buyout by the Chinese.
      Plus, GM isn't "dead" by any stretch of the imagination. The bankruptcy allows them to reorganize, shed dead weight (like Hummer and Saab and all those dealerships) and come out of it with a plan to make the company profitable again (which hopefully includes building the Volt and other cars on the same tech and selling the things in as many countries as possible including Australia)

    15. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone will buy Saab now, it has had worse sales than Hummer for a long time.

      In the USA (the chart you link to is USA sales). In the civilized world, Saab sells far more than Hummer - Saabs are still selling reasonably well in Europe.

      The biggest problem with Saab vehicles recently have all been caused by them being owned by GM (lousy dealers with questionable warranty coverage, problems with the GM engines, inclusion of "features" like OnStar). If Saab became an independant car company again, they would have a decent chance at survival. Hey, if Skoda can become a fairly well selling car brand, Saab could easily do the same thing.

    16. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      GM has been under public and governmental pressure to make a small domestic car for decades. Previous attempts (Corvair, Vega) were expensive failures. The Saturn is a huge effort to make a financially successful small car, and once again it is destroyed by expenses caused by unions. The car is reasonably reliable compared to the competition, even if not up to Toyota standards.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    17. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Do you have any suggestions about how the situation could have been handled better? As far as I can tell, the government went far beyond what was necessary or reasonable to try to keep the industry afloat. Even the unions were willing to consider virtually any plan on the table.

      Yes, the first stages of the bailout and stimulus were handled extremely poorly, and cut far too much slack for the financial industry. However, the people who orchestrated it are mostly out of office by now, and it's unlikely that anybody will trust the financial services industry for the next several generations. It's water under the bridge.

      Also, how is the US some sort of "alternate reality?" As far as I can tell, the only alternate reality took place over the past 4-6 years.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    18. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if not up to Toyota standards

      Just remember folks: if you didn't choose second best (or third or fourth, I think Honda comes in higher now...), it's because those damn unions turned you into a zombie!

      I'm sure the reason GM went from more than 50% of the market share decades ago to 18% this year was because the unions used their mind control rays to force everyone to buy better cars!

    19. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      A contract is a contract, unless you're blue collar huh?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    20. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      This is all about Wall Street and not Main Street.

      Is that you, Sarah Palin? Stop posting on slashdot, and get back home, woman! There's diapers to change and the snowmobiles need cleaning.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    21. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      If Saab became an independant car company again, they would have a decent chance at survival. Hey, if Skoda can become a fairly well selling car brand, Saab could easily do the same thing.

      Skoda is anything but independent. They're part of VW.

    22. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more, most Skodas aren't more than rebadged VWs and Audis. Fabia is basically a VW Polo, Octavia is basically a saloon version of a Golf and Superb is basically a VW Passat/Audi A4.

    23. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      GM didn't buy Saturn. It was a new division that was developed completely in house, with completely dedicated platforms, engines, and factories.

      It didn't "turn to crap" after GM bought them, because GM didn't buy them. It was crap for a few years after GM first released them, just like every new car is crap and has various bugs and issues to work out.

      And considering this was a new car from the ground up, it's not exactly surprising that there were problems.

      Incidentally, I owned a 1998 Saturn for six years, and it never gave me an serious problems. I'd still be driving it, but some idiot in a full-size pickup turned left across the front of me and I T-boned him at close to 80km/h. Totalled the car, and I walked away from it. The guy in the truck was hurt worse than I was. Which tells you something about the quality and safety of this car...

      It really pisses me off when some dope comes out with crap about some company (not that I'm not the first in line to bash corporate stupidity, mind you) when it's obvious they know nothing about them.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    24. Re:Are they going to still be sold here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler have both been shoved down the companies and investor's throats.

      You make the bed, you sleep in it. GM and Chrysler have been terrible companies in so many ways, I find it surprising they lasted as long as they did.

  9. Suburban wives nonplussed by bzzfzz · · Score: 1

    The demographic segment that characterizes their customer base is already accustomed to buying Chinese-made products from clothing to blow molded lawn ornaments.

    In other news, somebody in China thinks the price of oil is headed down.

    1. Re:Suburban wives nonplussed by Schnoogs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      News flash...most of the products purchased by people who don't own Hummers are also made in China.

    2. Re:Suburban wives nonplussed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately someone in China thinks the civilian model may be a good platform to build military spec Chinese vehicles....

    3. Re:Suburban wives nonplussed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately someone in China thinks the civilian model may be a good platform to build military spec Chinese vehicles....

      Not really.

  10. Great news! by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My goal of getting a hummer from a cute Asian girl is that much closer to completion!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, your chance of getting a hummer from an 8 year old Chinese factory worker just increased...

    2. Re:Great news! by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Dealer network is still going to be American. So, you'll probably be stuck buying your hummers from fat truck guys, as per usual.

  11. Heads aspode by microcars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    at the gas station in Wisconsin where I got "told" by a guy bitching about my Toyota.

    Despite the fact that my truck is built in Texas by Americans with 85% US content apparently the "profits" all go back to "Japan" SO THERE! (never mind Toyota being on the NYSE and the "profits" go to the shareholders...)
    I can't imagine what this guy will do now when a new Hummer - built in Louisiana by Americans, but owned by the Chinese - pulls up to the pump!

    I would love to be there when it happens though! ack ack ack....

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:Heads aspode by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reminds me of the "Buy American" bumper sticker I saw on a Ford Courier... sort of makes you want to pull the driver over and explain to them that a Courier was just a Mazda B2000 with different badges and a higher price tag. Hondas are made in Marysville, Ohio with electrical parts from Stanley -- there is no such thing as a truly "American" or "Japanese" car anymore.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Heads aspode by lelitsch · · Score: 1

      I hope the "Buy American" guy with his Hummer never walks into a Walmart. He might have a coronary.

    3. Re:Heads aspode by gpalyu · · Score: 1

      The difference is the amount of jobs you're supporting here with domestic vs. foreign. With Toyota you're supporting a few thousand schlubs being paid a decent wage to work in a factory. With the domestic you're supporting not just the people who build the cars but also the parts. Toyota and Honda don't build their parts here, they ship them from oversea's. The manufacturing base that is built up around these domestic guys is what is most valuable to us as a country. Those are the guys most of us know, not the ones who work at corporate hq or even the factory these days.

    4. Re:Heads aspode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are a real american hero!

    5. Re:Heads aspode by value_added · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder if it's just the "Buy American" bumper stickers that are laughable.

      There was a spot on the news last night where a retired couple who invested their retirement savings in GM bonds were interviewed. The husband was a tool and die maker in the auto industry, and both the husband and wife considered it their patriotic duty to invest in America. And if the American flag seen waving in the background was any indication, advocate the same to others.

      Needless to say their investments were wiped out.

      The post-war industrial strength of America may have existed for their parents when they retired (and their parents before them), but an investment strategy that involves a troubled industry and a company that routinely posted huge losses is indicative more of nostalgic yearnings than common sense.

      My own take is that the couple's situation could be considered laughable, as in "I invested in America and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.", but they didn't even get a T-shirt.

    6. Re:Heads aspode by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ya well people just want something to be stupid and patriotic about I guess. With the multi-national nature of the world these days, it gets rather silly to identify a company as a given nationality anyhow. Like Intel for example. It is an American company in that it is headquartered in the US and started there. Ok, but that isn't the only place its operations are. You can very well buy an Intel chip that was designed in the US, fabricated in Ireland, packaged in Costa Rica, and then sold in Canada. They've got various parts of their operation all over. While most of their fabs are in the US (one is in Ireland, two in Israel, 12 in the US) all their packaging and testing centres are outside the US. Likewise their R&D are in the US, but also Israel, China, Korea, Russia and so on.

      So is Intel really an "American" company? They really seem more global.

      They are not alone in this. That's how many major companies work. As you noted, the Japanese car makers are heavily producing in America these days. Makes a lot of sense, there are skilled workers, lots of land, good natural resources and a large consumer base. Why spend the money shipping the things over from Japan is they are mostly sold in the US? For that matter, some lines are completely produces in the US, even the ones sold in Japan.

      While I understand the desire to protect American jobs, that doesn't mean the company has to be headquarted in America. There are American companies that produce nothing in the US, and their are foreign companies that produce lots in the US. Really they are all global companies and their country of origin is largely incidental.

    7. Re:Heads aspode by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Where is the "Buy American" sticker made?

      Last few years, when I've been looking at "Canada Day" merchandise in the stores 100% of it is made in China. I felt there was too much irony and was quite saddened by this discovery, so I didn't buy any. Even the little Canadian flags were made in China.

      So, is this "Buy American" sticker "Made in China"?

    8. Re:Heads aspode by Robin47 · · Score: 1

      6 months ago I asked my broker if I should invest in GM and he said stay the hell away from it. Good call.

    9. Re:Heads aspode by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      and the Stanley parts are from this company: http://www.stanley.co.jp/e/company/president.html Just to make sure you're not confusing it with this company: http://www.stanleyworks.com/a_history.asp

    10. Re:Heads aspode by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As another interesting statistic, it's important to point out the the US's GNP is still slightly higher than its GDP.

      In other words, the value of goods produced in the US is roughly equal to the value of goods produced by US-owned companies and American citizens. For every foreign-owned factory in the US, there's another US-owned factory someplace else in the world.

      (Of course, as with any economic statistic, it's not quite that simple. However, the fact that both figures are roughly equivalent is a good sign)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:Heads aspode by CruisinAdam · · Score: 1

      And designed by American engineers? In a building staffed with American IT professionals? So we keep a few manufacturing jobs and send all of our high-tech jobs over to Japan? It's a free country. Buy whatever car you want. But don't pass it off as your American duty to buy imports. That's just silly.

    12. Re:Heads aspode by sponga · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this and don't mean to be racist.

      I put it this way with my Toyota truck to other owners of big cars.

      I tell them my Tacoma was built in Louisiana by American autoworkers and that I get much better gas mileage, which makes me feel better that I don't have to spend as much on gas which comes from Arab countries. I basically than tell them that by purchasing a Hummer that they are feeding 5 hunger Arab families everytime they fill up and that they just made a small donation to the local Mosque over there.

      Don't worry though brotha, in my job sometimes I operate a 800HP machine and some people kind of get a little shocked that I drive a little Toyota truck to there perfectly with all my tools in the back to put it in perspective.

      But yeah you are right, Chinese made and Arab powered.

    13. Re:Heads aspode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been watching the news hour. Saw that one too, and sat there in disbelief wondering how people could be so naive. I mean, sure, the invested in bonds, but WTF? They can't possibly NOT have understood that they should have had a more balanced portfolio, or those bonds distributed among multiple companies. Gheesh. I'm not sure if the American downfall is due to greed, or consumer stupidity. Oh yea - both.

    14. Re:Heads aspode by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The husband was a tool...

      I know he doesn't sound too smart, but there's no need to make personal insults.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Heads aspode by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      Well lets see... China has the largest amount of american debt purchased as US treasury bonds and such, so it is in fact the largest foreign investor...
      US companies go bankrupt and the Chinese happily buys them at cheap price to keep them afloat with huge load of backing fonds from home to support them for decades.

      0wned?

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
    16. Re:Heads aspode by Necroloth · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this and don't mean to be racist.

      makes me feel better that I don't have to spend as much on gas which comes from Arab countries. I basically than tell them that by purchasing a Hummer that they are feeding 5 hunger Arab families everytime they fill up and that they just made a small donation to the local Mosque over there.

      erm... yeah, good job at not trying to seem racist... oh, and don't forget your white hood on the way out!

    17. Re:Heads aspode by antic · · Score: 1

      Hate to see that guy when he *is* trying to be racist. Wow.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    18. Re:Heads aspode by microcars · · Score: 1

      "Toyota and Honda don't build their parts here, they ship them from oversea's."

      Oh really? Then why does mine have a sticker that says:
      PARTS CONTENT INFORMATION:
      USA/CANADA PARTS CONTENT: 75%
      MAJOR SOURCES OF FOREIGN PARTS CONTENT: Japan: 20%
      COUNTRY OF ORIGIN ENGINE PARTS: USA
      COUNTRY OF ORIGIN TRANSMISSION PARTS: USA


      You aren't from Wisconsin are you?

      --
      I like microcars
    19. Re:Heads aspode by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised to learn that most of our imported oil doesn't come from Arab countries.

    20. Re:Heads aspode by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Being a patriot doesn't have to be synonymous with bad decision making. Look for a modern company making modern products in this country, and give them your money. There are plenty of them.

      Pumping it into the bottomless hole that is GM, a company that's been flirting with bankruptcy for decades? Not smart. It's not just that they're allergic to innovation: it's that they're bloated and unable to adapt as well.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    21. Re:Heads aspode by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a truly "American" or "Japanese" car anymore.

      That's funny, my 2005 Scion tC was purchased with a sticker on it that said "100% Japanese parts, 100% Japanese made."

    22. Re:Heads aspode by IronChef · · Score: 1

      ... The husband was a tool and die maker in the auto industry, and both the husband and wife considered it their patriotic duty to invest in America.

      Wow. A patriotic investment portfolio is even dumber than patriotic car buying.

      If I have a patriotic duty to my nation's companies, that duty is to keep them strong and healthy. But blindly supporting your national industries does NOT keep them strong. Ask more of them. Make them compete. Make them innovate. Make them EARN your business. If they can't do that, they do not deserve your support.

      If you buy in anyway out of loyalty, you are helping to build a house of cards and in the long run that helps no one. Except for some company executives, anyway.

    23. Re:Heads aspode by sponga · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Oil_Reserves_by_Region.PNG

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves

      56% in Middle East and North America at 16%
      Saudi Arabia
      Canada
      Iran
      Iraq
      Kuwait
      United Arab Emirates

      Although I guess you have to be kind and call them mostly Persian, although there has been so much chaos that some people claim they are other cultures which they are nothing more than really Nomads trapped by the closed borders.

      Although that is kind of racist to be saying that it is Chinese owned, the Chinese have a great culture why do you have to hate them so much. Trying to find a fair comparison, although Canada looks second in Oil Reserves. So maybe Canuck powered?

  12. America... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    America's classic redneck, blow-hard, compensation-for-a-little-something vehicle is being sold to China?

    ...It's official, America has truly collapsed and is now on the third-world countries list.

    1. Re:America... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      America is a third world country with a dozen or so first world city-states, and has been so for a long, long time.

    2. Re:America... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      "America's classic redneck, blow-hard, compensation-for-a-little-something"

      That'd be the F250 IMO. Hummer screams status-obsessed doctor, not obnoxious redneck.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  13. [Insert Small-Asian-Penis Joke Here] by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just kinda writes itself, really.

    1. Re:[Insert Small-Asian-Penis Joke Here] by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      LOL you beat me to it :)

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    2. Re:[Insert Small-Asian-Penis Joke Here] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean: "ROR, Amellican man have very rarge penis, make funny joke faster"?

    3. Re:[Insert Small-Asian-Penis Joke Here] by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, we may have larger penises, but we're also too damn tall.

    4. Re:[Insert Small-Asian-Penis Joke Here] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an American of Asian descent, and I would love to read Slashdot without having to see these racist and hurtful comments.

  14. Goodriddance by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's about all I can say for the abomination that the Hummer became.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  15. Aha! by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Suckazz!

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Aha! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      You are more right than you know. The United States could profit greatly from transactions such as this. All we need to do is continue to offload worthless assets to clueless foreign investors. The Hummer brand has little to no value, and now that everyone (well, presumably everyone) knows that Hummers will be Chinese-owned (and possibly Chinese-manufactured), what little American machismo the Hummer has left will be gone.

    2. Re:Aha! by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Worthless asset ... like the gobload of Treasury notes the Chinese hold ...

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:Aha! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Indeed. We somehow managed convince a nation of one billion mostly intelligent people to not only give us valuable goods in exchange for worthless green paper, but also to accept even more worthless representations of pieces of worthless green paper made on the tiny magnetic domains of a cheap piece of rust-covered glass in an undisclosed location in lieu of actual worthless paper...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, we've also convinced a nation of 300 million to accept the same worthless green paper money.

      We're all screwed.

  16. "Communist" China.. workers paradise? by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

    I would definitely love to be around for the contract negotiations.

    --
    Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
  17. Turns out by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    that AM General is actually working with two chinese companies in helping them PRODUCE the H1. In fact, they have been doing so since the 80's for one and the 90's for the other. Besides, PLA already has PLENTY of western equipment as well as other items that classified.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Turns out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind US military equipment built in and by China...

      Look what happened to AK47-s.

      Give it a dacade and every army in the world, guerrillas, terrorists and such - all will be driving humvees.

    2. Re:Turns out by mustafap · · Score: 1

      Not with today's oil prices

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    3. Re:Turns out by baKanale · · Score: 1

      There's also a bunch of different international versions that are either modified HMMWVs (the military Humvee) or are based on the HMMWV chassis, including the versions from two different Chinese companies. There's also the variety of similar vehicles out there, the one from Toyota also being somewhat derived from the US model.

    4. Re:Turns out by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      The Greeks have a fastback Humvee!

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    5. Re:Turns out by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I cannot imagine there's anything classified about a HumVee - even the real one (H1), let alone the H2 which is a re-decorated Chevy Tahoe / GMC Yukon. As for the "Hummer Brand" somehow having anything to do with secret ultra-cool military technology, sheesh, that's certainly what they'd like you to imagine, but it ain't so.

    6. Re:Turns out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was saying that equipment being used by the Chinese Army is from western classified arsenal, not that HumVee is classified.

    7. Re:Turns out by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It was saying that equipment being used by the Chinese Army is from western classified arsenal, not that HumVee is classified.

      Well, sure. Militaries all over the world copy whatever they can from each other. Since our military budget is as big as the rest of the world combined, we voluntarily pick up most of the check.

    8. Re:Turns out by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Have you seen Toyota's Megacruiser? It's a Hummer, but made by Toyota, with "eurostyle" grill and headlights. Almost exactly the same dimensions, within a few mm of the H1. They only made them for 7 years (till 2002), but I suspect if North Korea keeps their shit up, Toyota could put them back on the assembly line in six to eight months no problem. The only complicated part of a H1 is that ridiculous (HEAVY! wtf) drivetrain inside the hubs, but is easy to copy.
       
      Toyota/Japan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Mega_Cruiser
      Russian Hummer clone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAZ-2975
      Spanish, Romanian, Portuguese, Belgian, Moroccan, Venezuelian, Dominican Republic Clone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAMTAC
      Danish, Swiss, German Clone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOWAG_Eagle
      Hell the poor Greeks even export a variant to god knows who: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELBO
       
      Dunno what was wrong with the old CJ-2, cost $400 (at the time) to produce, weighed about 1000 lbs and would carry four men over most battlefield terrain at 35-60mph with almost zero maintenance. Compared to these modern monsters they were the epitome of efficiency.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:Turns out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, to defeat a PLA with HumVees, all we'd have to do is dig some ditches and wait for the CV joints to snap.

      HMMWV's are not nearly as good as the US Gov't would lead you to believe. They blow up, snap axles, and stop working for a multitude of reasons. As a off-roader, they are pretty good, but as a Multi-Terrain War Vehicle, they are awful. My friend can attest to that. He's almost lost his life to a HMMWV in Afganistan, no enemy fire involved, just awful engineering. A poster somewhere up there said that the Pinzgauer is a preferred vehicle over there, and they are right. They may not have the "Mean" look that the HMMWV has but they are more reliable, and will keep running as long as the wheels are still connected and there's diesel in the tank. There are many American units that have "appropriated" some from the British units there. In fact when a British unit gets rotated back to the home office, Usually an American commander will show up as they pack up and attempt to get the vehicle listed as "lost/destroyed" so they can keep using it instead of it getting shipped back to a UK military base.

  18. So.... by ak_hepcat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who gets the happy ending now?

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  19. EV-1 by Nonillion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guess that decision to produce the Hummer over the EV-1 has come back to bite GM in the ASS big time!

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:EV-1 by mobby_6kl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they had been making the EV-1 instead of the Hummers all this time, they would have probably gone bankrupt ten years ago. So... no.

    2. Re:EV-1 by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      And how many tens of billions of dollars would our country have saved if they had gone bankrupt ten years ago? and we'd have electric cars to show for it.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:EV-1 by joggle · · Score: 1

      Not if they followed the Toyota model. Toyota initially lost money on the Prius but over time were able to lower production costs to the point that not only could they produce them at a profit but could not make them fast enough to meet demand (at least not up until the recession that hit).

    4. Re:EV-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      GM ex-President Rick Wagoner says that killing off the EV1 was his worst mistake. Not only did they stop making the cars, but they canceled the entire program.

      http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2009-05-31-gm-mistakes-bankruptcy_N.htm

    5. Re:EV-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM claims each EV-1 costed $400,000 to make and that developing it in the first place cost them 1 Billion dollars, I don't buy it.
      How in the hell can copper wire spooled around a couple of magnets, with 200$ of Chinese made electronics and a couple of battery's
      in a smaller then chevy cavalier vehicle cost $400,000 to make and a Billion dollars to develop. Ohh right I forgot the executive pay could
      easily cover the entire Billion dollar development bill by it self.

      whoever tells you that electric cars cost alot to make is an idiot. The only part that is expensive is the battery's, and that is because
      Chevron owns Ovonic the holder of several important NIMH battery patents, note however those patents run out in 2011. If I can convert a chevy S-10
      truck to electricity for a few thousand dollars you bet that GM could manufacture new electric cars for retail prices under 20 grand.

    6. Re:EV-1 by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We had electric cars 100 years ago.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car#1830s_to_1900s:_Early_history

      And there's been manufacturers that made them over the years since then, too. It's doubtful that they'd have had mass appeal if GM had started manufacturing the EV1 10 years ago, because 1) gas was still cheap, and 2) there were still some technological barriers in place. The combonation of those two factors is what prevented the electric car from being manufactured en masse, not GM's decision not to keep making it.

      And why are electric cars gaining in popularity today? Because gas has become significantly more expensive, because a greater proportion of the population has become aware of the environmental issues we face today, and the impact our actions are having on it, and because there've been some major breakthroughs in technologies such as batteries that have made building and operating an electric car a more economical proposition.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    7. Re:EV-1 by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The Prius was a real car. The EV-1 was a very fast golf cart.

      Americans will NOT buy a car that cannot go a full day of driving. Or, rather, they won't unless it's cheaper than a car that can, + the additional travel expenses.

      Electric cars simply do not scale. Even when oil goes to $1,000 a barrel, we'll switch to another liquid fuel. Maybe you could turn all of Japan or Korea electric, and then phase America over. But not the other way around.

    8. Re:EV-1 by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      whoever tells you that electric cars cost alot to make is an idiot.

      whoever tells you that alot is a word is an idiot.

      One word: bureaucracy

      Additionally, it's not just a matter of stuffing batteries and an electric motor into the place where there was a petrol engine. The car was designed from the ground up to meet existing and anticipated standards of safety, styling, performance, and producibility. Prototypes were built and tested. Two generations of the EV1 went through that. All this and more, and plenty of corporate waste, went into development. Production costs include amortization of the production line over the 1100 vehicles produced.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:EV-1 by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      The Volt can't come soon enough.
      An electric car with a range extender (internal combustion engine for backup).
      http://www.chevrolet.com/experience/fuel-solutions/electric/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevy_Volt
      And it will be built close to my birthplace
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamtramck,_Michigan

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    10. Re:EV-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I love when people say GM should have made smaller cars. Like GEO Metros right? Yeah those sold so f'ing well. I think the thing people really don't understand about SUVs is the win span is HUGE. If you make a 14,000 dollar car it is going to cost you at least 8,000 dollars probably closer to 10,000. Yet a 40,000 dollar SUV costs about 16,000 to make maybe even less. And needs more maintenance. Also factor in competing with complains that have less over head then you do (Pensions, Labor cost, etc) and are perceived has having better quality. What would you do??? PHBs could even figure this one out. Remember, that Toyota and Honda along with many European Brands where kicking themselves in the butt over not having made big SUVs right about until the price of GAS sky rocketed. SUVs kept the American Auto companies alive well longer then would have been otherwise possible. Which was probably worse for all of us. Going bankrupt in a good economy is easier on everyone then in a bad economy.

    11. Re:EV-1 by joggle · · Score: 1

      I think the best reply is to simply use a few recent quotes from GM executives:

      "GM R&D chief Larry Burns . . . now wishes GM hadn't killed the plug-in hybrid EV1 prototype his engineers had on the road a decade ago: 'If we could turn back the hands of time,' says Burns, 'we could have had the Chevy Volt 10 years earlier.' (http://www.newsweek.com/id/36484/Page/3)

      Rick Wagoner (former CEO of GM) expressed regret over canceling the EV-1 project and not continuing research on hybrid technologies (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97826113&ft=1&f=1006 about 1 minute into the audio clip)

      ----

      The point is they should not have stopped research on fuel efficient cars just because there was no longer any political pressure on them to do so (previously they had an agreement with the Clinton administration to research fuel efficient technology in return for no increase in federal fuel economy standards and an infusion of cash to finance the research). Instead they bet the company on oil remaining relatively cheap and consumer demand for SUVs to remain high.

  20. Slashdot: STOP CENSORING my post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As the original Anoymous poster of the entry, I must obligate to point out the important part of my post was DELETED by the editor:

    Before you worry about soldiers of US army and marines riding on Chinese made jeeps, you should also note that GM China has made recorded sales in China, despite of its parent's woe in the US. I personally did notice quite a lot more Buick's running in the city of Shenzhen than on the streets of California. When I was over there, I owned a Buick myself which was made in China but with US-made engines and transmissions; whereas i own a Japanese car here in California. Strange world.

    GM's cars are among the top seller over there.

    Maybe you don't like to hear US company ``succeed'' in China, but don't censor our posts!

    1. Re:Slashdot: STOP CENSORING my post! by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      After years of /.ers complaints, the editor edited, finnaly.

      What did he get for it?

      Accusations of censorship, YELLED at him.

      You blew it.

    2. Re:Slashdot: STOP CENSORING my post! by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Unlike the Buicks of China, the US ones have actual power to them. Find a slave-labor built Chinese Buick with a 3800, and I'll say it's a one-off copy. Enjoy your mysterious head gasket failures at 40,000 miles.

      They're just poor copies of the Real McCoy, undeserving of the Buick name.

      As for the folks who bought anything with the N* engines, the joke's on you. Hopefully you're not at the wrong end of a slave labor camp uprising and the engine blows as they reach you; I'd consider it karmic justice.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:Slashdot: STOP CENSORING my post! by Malc · · Score: 1

      I would guess that there is a Buick factory in Shenzhen. It seems that Chinese cities seem to grant companies monopolies if they agree to building a factory. Shanghai is very VW (every taxi seems to be a VW Satana), as is Hangzhou (every taxi seems to be a VW Passat).

      A Chinese colleague of mine in Hangzhou bought a used Buick, which at the exchange rate was more expensive than if he'd bought it Stateside. This is amazing, especially considering he's earning 25% of what our engineers in California earn, and thus that the relative costs of petrol and insurance are also much higher.

  21. Heavy Machinery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sympathies to the sweatshop kids.

  22. Mil version H1 is good by AnAdventurer · · Score: 2, Informative
    While the Humvee is a good mil truck. The H2 is basically a Suburban and the H3 is basically a POS that was a failed attempt to capitalize on the desire of those who wished to own a H2 but couldn't afford one.

    There is irony that a Chinese company now owns the brand, but I am not going to back that up with how.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  23. hummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just about network and name recognition. Business and not technology.
    (Like Fiat buying Chrysler).

    The Chinese already got so many variations of the Hummer it's not funny.

  24. American Cars Sell Like Hotcakes... by tripmine · · Score: 1

    ...in China. Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co doesn't really care about the lowering demand for SUV's in the United States. They have an emerging middle class that just loves American cars. Remember, a national market does not get any bigger than the Chinese market.

  25. Shocking by Minwee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never thought I would see the day that an iconic US American brand being sold off to a Chinese company.

    This is truly unprecedented.

    1. Re:Shocking by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      IBM's PC division was never the core focus of its business, even though it might have been their most visible sector.

      Given that PCs today are basically treated as commodities (and produced in southeast Asia), the sale to Lenovo actually did make a lot of sense. IBM was also increasingly unable to compete on costs with their competitors. It was sad to see an icon vanish, although nostalgia is a dangerous emotion to apply to economic decisions.

      IBM's big on R&D, and the PC industry stagnated. It's no surprise that they wanted to focus their efforts on places where they would actually be able to innovate, and create the "next best thing." Although the actual "future" of the PC market remains to be seen, IBM's decision to forecast the future of their industry, and use their capital to explore new venues should be lauded, not criticized. Had GM done the same thing, they should have seen the need to develop fuel-efficient vehicles, and would have improved their manufacturing processes to at least give consumers the illusion of quality. I feel sorry for the workers, but it's frankly surprising that GM even lasted this long, given their inability to adequately design, manufacture, and market their products.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is the Apple link doing there? Apple's brand hasn't been sold off to a Chinese company. If you want to list every "American" company that sources parts or has manufacturing in China, then go for it; otherwise explain why you linked to them.

    3. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Designed in California. Made in China.
      Logic boards needs replacement occasionally, just coincidence.

    4. Re:Shocking by Minwee · · Score: 1

      What the hell is the Apple link doing there?

      That's just to get a rise out of the rabid fanboys who don't understand big words like "precedent". Thanks for playing.

  26. . . . Ricardo Montalban sells HumVees . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    So no, the Chinese are not getting military information out of it, other than perhaps how to add leather seats and cupholders to an existing H1.

    . . .and rich Corinthian Leather . . .

    . . . if the Chinese get that technology, we're all toast . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  27. Chummers by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 3, Funny

    China goes chumming for American brands. Who's next, ChitiBank?

    1. Re:Chummers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China goes chumming for American brands. Who's next, ChitiBank?

      Wouldn't that be...

      Chit-citi bank bank?

    2. Re:Chummers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ShitiBank

  28. Next... by copponex · · Score: 1

    Now when do you think Chevron and Exxon will start licensing the patents the own on electric vehicle technology? Looking at their oil profits these days, I'd say after half of the Caribbean is under water.

    1. Re:Next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      After 2014, it won't matter much. Many of the patents are due to expire.

  29. The missing part? by hackingbear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The original post has

    Before you worry about soldiers of US army and marines riding on Chinese made jeeps, you should also note that GM China has made recorded sales in China, despite of its parent's woe in the US. I personally did notice quite a lot more Buick's running in the city of Shenzhen than on the streets of California. When I was over there, I owned a Buick myself which was made in China but with US-made engines and transmissions; whereas i own a Japanese car here in California. Strange world.

    Why is it edited away? Is / . censoring our post, because the news of american company doing well in China does not fit the site's editorial agenda?

    1. Re:The missing part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I owned a Buick myself which was made in China but with US-made engines and transmissions

      The worst of both worlds!

    2. Re:The missing part? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Why? As a former owner, I don't see it being bad quality -- the engine/transmission/electronics or the overall. Maybe it is not best, but certainly not bad.

    3. Re:The missing part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it edited away? Is / . censoring our post, because the news of american company doing well in China does not fit the site's editorial agenda?

      So now you're bitching that the EDITORS of slashdot are doing their fucking jobs for once and actually editing a submission?!? While the extra bit is mildly interesting, it really has no bearing on the point of the actual story/article itself.

    4. Re:The missing part? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What does GM China making sales in China have to do with the army riding jeeps?

    5. Re:The missing part? by Rik+Rohl · · Score: 1

      Why is it edited away? Is / . censoring our post, because the news of american company doing well in China does not fit the site's editorial agenda?

      Look who posted the story.

    6. Re:The missing part? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      They did cut out anything positive about GM save the jobs "saved." (I'm curious how that number is calculated as well.)

    7. Re:The missing part? by iroll · · Score: 1

      It was probably deleted because it's misleading and completely uninformative.

      "Hummer" is a badge that was created by GM and AM General for civilian HMMWVs (which are made by AM General). It was used for some GM-designed trucks that AM General built.

      Selling the "Hummer" badge doesn't mean a damned thing to GM China or to the US Army. AM General is completely independent of GM. It would be nice if somebody would explain their relationship to the newly divorced Hummer, but that "missing paragraph" was nothing but fluff and nonsense.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    8. Re:The missing part? by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, compared to Japanase/Korean/European engines, the engines built in the US aren't particularly well-known for their sophistication or efficiency. Just for their cubic inches. Seeing that some European 1.6 litre 4-cylinder engines already churn out 275 bhp and 240 Nm, 350 bhp from a 4+ litre V8 isn't particularly impressive. Especially if you look at the mileage.

    9. Re:The missing part? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Speed costs. How fast do you wanna go? Now show me a Euro or Japanese engine that you can throw anything into that will burn, and then go that fast.

      --
      C|N>K
    10. Re:The missing part? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Are those 4 cylinder engines naturally aspirated? Who makes them and are they available in the US?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    11. Re:The missing part? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I'd say that they are turbocharged. But that just begs the question: why do American car-manufacturers prefer large inefficient engines, as opposed to smaller turbocharged engined? Hell, VW has a 1.4 liter engine that generates 125Kw. It's both turbocharged AND supercharged.

      What benefit is there in having 3+ liter engine, as opposed to having a smaller turbocharged engine? Seriously?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    12. Re:The missing part? by Gill+Bates · · Score: 1

      What benefit is there in having 3+ liter engine, as opposed to having a smaller turbocharged engine? Seriously?

      Torque. Seriously.

    13. Re:The missing part? by sucati · · Score: 1

      if we're talking about trucks, I don't think you can tow/haul with a non-diesel turbo engine. that would be why they are big naturally aspirated engines.

    14. Re:The missing part? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      You could, but fuel economy is going to be horrible compared to the diesel. My Dad and an uncle had the same Dodge truck, but different motors (Cummins diesel vs gasoline V10). Dad's diesel could pull a little heavier trailers and got 2x the mileage as my uncle's truck did.

      Low RPM torque is where the bigger displacement engines have the advantage, but having lots of it isn't as important in a little car as it is with a work truck. In the future, I'd expect series hybrids to start to do some of the jobs of the big displacement engines. The IC engine can run at a high constant RPM to drive the generator when needed and the electric motors can provide lots of torque. That's how most diesel electric trains work now, so you would think that large truck manufacturers would probably be looking at such designs, especially if they can get battery packs that work well enough for their application.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:The missing part? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      What benefit is there in having 3+ liter engine, as opposed to having a smaller turbocharged engine? Seriously?

      Everything runs on regular in the US. Americans would never spend the additional 5-10% for premium, even if they got 10% more mileage out of it. And downsized, multi-turbocharged engines pretty much require premium, or even higher quality gasoline.

    16. Re:The missing part? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      The twincharged engine I mentioned runs on normal 95E gasoline, although VW recommends 98E.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    17. Re:The missing part? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Turbocharging and supercharging increases torque as well. Normal aspirated 1.4-liter engine from VW generates 132Nm @ 3800RPM. The turbocharged version of that engine generates 200Nm @ 1500-4000RPM, whereas the twincharged version generates 240Nm @ 2400RPM. So you obviously do not need to increase the displacement in order to increase the torque.

      And if you want torque, then you should be driving a diesel. VW's 2.0TDI generates 320Nm @ 1750-2500RPM.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    18. Re:The missing part? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      The twincharged engine I mentioned runs on normal 95E gasoline,

      And that's premium by US standards (and usually 10-30 cents more expensive per gallon). Regular is the stuff that goes by 91 octanes (*) in Europe and is about to be phased out here (since there are pretty much no cars that use it, and thanks to the US' thirst for it it's about as expensive as premium anyway).

      (*) Be aware that the US and Europe use different ways to determine octane numbers - "87 octane" (US, "regular") is comparable to "91 octane" (Europe, "normal"), and "91 octane" (US, "premium") is comparable to "95 octane" (Europe, "super").

      Heck, in some places (high elevation, e.g. some parts of Colorado) you can even get 85 octane gasoline, since the low air pressure at those elevations reduces the tendency to knock. Just be sure you don't go back down that mountain until you've used up most of the gas in your tank, and refill once you're down.

    19. Re:The missing part? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      So you obviously do not need to increase the displacement in order to increase the torque.

      But the American customer wants high torque at low RPM, and definitely from a gasoline engine because diesel is considered sooooooo dirty. Of course, the result are high-displacement, gas-guzzling engines.

      And if you want torque, then you should be driving a diesel. VW's 2.0TDI generates 320Nm @ 1750-2500RPM.

      Unfortunately, the poor quality of the diesel fuel in the US (lower cetane number, impurities, etc) poses serious problems for these modern, fuel-injected diesel engines (buddy of mine works for Bosch and he's swearing like a drunk sailor every time that topic comes up). But the engine you mention is a sweet piece of engineering, I usually get 40+ mpg (45+ on highways) with my Touran.

    20. Re:The missing part? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      But the American customer wants high torque at low RPM

      And those turbocharged engines achieve just that. The turbocharged engine gets it's max torque at 1500RPM! Twincharged version reaches it's max torque a bit higher, but I bet that it give more than 200Nm at 1500RPM.

      Engines usually idle at a bit below 1000RPM. So in practice you have near the max amount of torque available right above the idle-RPM.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    21. Re:The missing part? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      And those turbocharged engines achieve just that.

      Yes, with gasoline that American customers don't want to pay for. "What, $0.30 more per gallon? No way, I'm sticking with my 7L V8 and pay so much less per gallon.". Nevermind that the charged downsized engine gets twice the mileage. I'm not saying that I follow this reasoning, it's just what I have observed.

  30. H3 by thewaker · · Score: 1

    The H3 is based off the Colorado/Canyon small truck platform as I can recall.

  31. Streets of Beijing by specific_pacific · · Score: 1

    I've seen about 50+ on the streets of Beijing between other fancy pants cars from club owners, celebrities and job x. They build it big in China AND the US, so they fit right in.

  32. Maybe... by IonOtter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they'll start using H3s as a aphrodisiac instead of rhino horn and tiger penis? Oh, wait, they'll want something that actually works...

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Maybe... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I know someone who made a good living in the late 1980s by exporting used king-cab dually pickups to wealthy Japanese, who would pay 2-3 times the going price just to own one. Having a big truck sitting in your driveway was a status symbol. Never mind that these bigger pickups weren't even legal to drive (nor would they fit on the roads) in some of the areas where the buyers lived -- they bought 'em anyway.

      At least Americans who buy Hummers actually drive the damn things, rather than using them solely as part of the local dick-measuring contest, as was the case with wealthy Japanese buying oversized pickup trucks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human horn.

    3. Re:Maybe... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Never mind that these bigger pickups weren't even legal to drive (nor would they fit on the roads)

      They're questionably legal in the UK, too. They don't entirely meet any safety requirement devised this century, and most insurance companies won't touch them because after a 15mph bump with anything else on the roads here, they're fit for scrap and all the occupants are injured. On the off chance they'd do enough damage to injure anyone in the car they hit, they'd be ruined by the compensation suit for letting such an obviously unroadworthy vehicle be used.

    4. Re:Maybe... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Sarchasm[tm] aside, the reason they weren't legal in part of Japan is because the roads there were too narrow to accomodate dually trucks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  33. Status symbol by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Some people actually need a vehicle with more than 12 " ground clearance.

    Maybe but that describes virtually no one that actually buys a HUMMER. I see them driving around town on a daily basis and I am quite sure not a single one I see has spent a moment even on a dirt road much less off road. A HUMMER is an insanely capable off road vehicle but it is purchased almost exclusively as a status symbol - and an especially wasteful one at that.

    For status, get an Escalade.

    Anyone who buys an Escalade is nearly as big an insecure douche as anyone who buys a HUMMER H2.

    For panache, get a Caterpillar.

    Now that would be stylin'. If someone is going to be a greedy jackass why not go all the way? I love it!

    1. Re:Status symbol by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      A HUMMER is an insanely capable off road vehicle

      It's fragile, underpowered and heavy, with crap axle articulation (hint - ground clearance isn't everything). Ditch the wheezy gutless petrol puttputt and fit a proper engine, fix the suspension and steering (further hint - the wheels are meant to go up and down and the body is meant to stay still), and then it would be as good as a Suzuki SJ410 full of depleted uranium.

    2. Re:Status symbol by sjbe · · Score: 1

      It's fragile, underpowered and heavy, with crap axle articulation

      Consumer Reports and Edmunds both seem to think you are full of crap in your analysis of its offroad abilities. Furthermore how you can call a vehicle with nearly 400HP underpowered strikes me as bizarre, even as heavy as it is. I've ridden in one myself on an offroad test track and it was impressive - though I'd never buy one in a million years. Perhaps you are referring to the H3 which was supposedly designed primarily for urban use and might actually be underpowered?

      There is plenty to complain about with Hummers but please criticize the right things.

    3. Re:Status symbol by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Furthermore how you can call a vehicle with nearly 400HP underpowered

      400bhp, like the way an Argos stereo is "100W". They do *not* produce 400bhp except if you use interestingly fudged measurements. Also, they're producing their "400bhp" from a 6.2 litre engine. Even if that was right, that's still a woeful amount of power from an engine that size. The VW VR6 engine produces nearly as much power from half the displacement.

      I've driven one offroad, and it was shit. Far too heavy, not enough power, rubbish gearing and as I've mentioned before not nearly enough axle articulation. The latter is the big problem - even though it's got a lot of ground clearance so it doesn't get bellied, it still gets cross-axled on things that wouldn't stick a normal family car...

    4. Re:Status symbol by sjbe · · Score: 1

      400bhp, like the way an Argos stereo is "100W". They do *not* produce 400bhp except if you use interestingly fudged measurements.

      And your evidence for this is what? I've worked with engine dynos professionally and I'm quite familiar with how horsepower is rated. Show me the evidence to back up your assertion.

      Also, they're producing their "400bhp" from a 6.2 litre engine.

      According to GM the Hummer H2 engine produces 393 HP at 5700RPM. Compare that with the 5.7L 381HP engine on the Toyota Tundra or the 6.8L V10 from the Ford F250 which produces 362HP at 4750. Sounds like they're pretty much in the ball park for a normally aspirated petrol truck engine around 6L in size to me.

      The VW VR6 engine produces nearly as much power from half the displacement.

      Bullshit. I've owned a series of VWs continually since the 1980s. The VR6 is a fine engine but it isn't even close to 400HP in any sort of normally aspirated form. I don't think I've ever seen a VR6 north of 300HP in any stock VW, Audi or Porsche vehicle.

      Let's do some math shall we? 300HP/3.6L = 83HP/L : 400HP/6.2L=64HP/L. Given that there are some vehicles with HP/L over 100 (usually turbocharged 4 cylinders), it is quite possible to get more HP out of either engine but the VR6 has clearly been tweaked more and isn't really designed for low rpm torque. To get that HP the VR6 has to rev higher and the torque curve looks much different. Furthermore larger displacement does not linearly translate into higher horsepower especially between dissimilar engines.

      ...it still gets cross-axled on things that wouldn't stick a normal family car...

      Having driven and ridden in an H2 off-road on an actual test track myself I know you are full of crap. There are more capable off-road vehicles than the H2 (not the least of which is the original Hummer) but the H2 is plenty capable for pretty much anything but truly ridiculous off-road trails. Not that anyone who actually owns a Hummer actually takes the vehicle off-road what with it being a "look how much money I make" penis-mobile...

  34. Summed up in five words by whiledo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... at least for a while.

    That's really the most important part of the summary.

    --
    Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
  35. Re:Yay ching ... by noshellswill · · Score: 0

    Sure you'll get it from a Chi.com ... right up the *zzwhole and palsy is it ever gonna hurt.

  36. This is a warning to those other industries by DragonTHC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Keep plowing ahead ignoring your customers.
    After all, they'll buy what you damn well want them to buy, right? Wrong. GM had piss-poor leadership, management with no vision. They kept making product that no one wanted to buy. The market handled GM alright.

    Now, just think if GM had treated every potential customer that entered a dealership as a criminal.

    Watch out RIAA/MPAA your industries are next. The market will handle you as well.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Your post might be correct if you said that in 1976 through to 1990. Things changed, while there weren't screwups at the top; not as bad as Chrysler(and this is why investment companies suck). People bought GM just fine, the issue became the $4/gal($8/gal Canada) for fuel, and then the massive credit collapse.

      Hi Americans, I'm looking at you! Once you guys figure out how not to slow down an entire world economy by having solvency issues maybe we'll get shit back on track. But I expect shit to really hit the fan about December of this year, maybe January when the second round of defaults start. Don't forget those evil Japanese just bailed out Toyota, Honda, Sony and Hitachi because all of their sales have dropped between 40-60% so far. And that isn't even touching on the medium-small guys.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by gringofrijolero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch out RIAA/MPAA your industries are next. The market will handle you as well.

      Eh so what. The money will move(diversify?) into into other markets, and we keep the same people in charge.. What's changed? The market is dumb. Where's my AM stereo?

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    3. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by ianare · · Score: 1

      You mean we'll nationalise the entertainment industry too ? Sounds awfully dangerous ...

    4. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People bought GM just fine, the issue became the $4/gal($8/gal Canada) for fuel, and then the massive credit collapse.

      They should have seen $4 gasoline coming, and even before the credit collapse they were losing massive amounts of money. GM's entire philosophy over the last fifteen years was to make large profits selling luxury trucks and SUV's, and they declined to invest in the future or diversify their products. Toyota and Honda spent that same period of time investing in hybrid technology and fuel efficiency while at the same time making trucks and SUV's, and now they are in a significantly more competitive position.

      At the very least, they could've seen the writing on the wall a couple years ago like Ford, and pre-emptively reorganized their company. They did *nothing*, it is entirely their fault, and they deserve to fail.

    5. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by umghhh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the important issue from GP post is that GM is merely a side effect of more general problem US (and to less extent UK) economy has - they let the finance industry grow without any limits and it did grow to the point that it was more reasonable to invest in snake oil eeeee virtual financial products 'decoupled' from reality then into something real. The consequence as could have been expected was the demise of other industries and growing of bubbles wherever virtual wealth tried to become real exactly as if finance were affected by malicious cancer. Now we have a problem apparently the biggest economy in the world is seriously sick. The finance part of it albeit sick too is still considered better place to invest money than local finance industry in china for instance. I wonder what happens when inevitable change in perception occurs.

    6. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by bogjobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the important issue from GP post is that GM is merely a side effect of more general problem US (and to less extent UK) economy has...

      But that was my point. GM is not merely a side effect of a more general problem in the US. The financial crisis has finished off GM, but they were already losing money before the economy dropped off a cliff. They didn't go bankrupt because the economy collapsed, they went bankrupt because they were mismanaged. They couldn't afford to stay in business, even with the government giving them billions of dollars a month. Somehow Ford, the European automakers, and the Japanese automakers all managed to stay solvent in the same market.

    7. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the US government will take a 70% stake in the RIAA by forcing them into bankruptcy then use our tax dollars to keep them afloat?

    8. Re:This is a warning to those other industries by hovermike · · Score: 1

      Before the financiapocalypse, Ford took out what appeared to be a very bad loan at the time which has saved their butts. They have about 12 months of operating capital - which may be enough if they can increase their market share from what GM may be losing.

  37. Jobs losses were inevitable by sjbe · · Score: 1

    So they will trot out that they saved 3,000 or so jobs.

    A little cynical are we? The job loses at GM are going to be in the many tens of thousands. GM is closing 14 plants and 3 distribution centers. That is a HUGE number of workers getting pink slips and it won't stop there.

    What about the 100,000 plus jobs lost when all the dealerships are being forced to close, even ones who make a profit? A considerable number, if not the majority, of dealerships being punted are profitable.

    What about them? GM has been hemorrhaging money for years so these dealerships have been getting a free ride for some time. GM almost certainly has WAY more dealerships than it actually needs and that means it is cannibalizing sales and hurting profit margins both for the dealers and for GM. It costs money to support those dealerships and many of them are not well run operations. It's a lot easier to control the quality of customer service with fewer dealerships. Toyota has far fewer dealerships and every year gets better customer service ratings than most if not all GM divisions. Some sort of contraction was virtually inevitable. That in no way minimizes the unfortunate nature of what has occurred but it is not even remotely a surprise.

    If you really want to see where the trouble is happening by the way look at the auto suppliers. Visteon declared bankruptcy and there will be plenty more besides.

  38. For once! by Ozlanthos · · Score: 1

    I have been hearing about this crap all day long from every AM station I listen to (even NPR). I do believe this is the very first time I heard about it there, without having already read about it like 2 weeks before on /. . Some hell somewhere has just frozen over......

    -Oz

  39. They already have all the information by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Behold, Chinese Humvees: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRC_HMMWVs
    (it must be stressed that current Hummers have absolutely nothing in common with Humvee)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:They already have all the information by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      (it must be stressed that current Hummers have absolutely nothing in common with Humvee)

      Exactly, the military HMMWVs (Humvee) is made by AM General.
      General Motors markets civilian version of Humvee dubbed H1 (discontinued), and the H2 and H3 based on its designs.

      Hummer (brand) will be sold, this will have no effect on AM General and the military HMMWVs.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:They already have all the information by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...H1 (discontinued), and the H2 and H3 based on its designs.

      I'd say "based on its looks" (but of course made appropriately crappy, for general consumption, with "cool" elements)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  40. Range Rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese also bought Range Rover (everything but the name). They also build a clone of the Rolls-Royce.

  41. Stalinist purge by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0, Troll

    Almost all the dealers being cut off are owned by Republicans. This is a clear act of political aggression by the Obama administration. We are on track to tyranny.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Stalinist purge by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Maybe because only Republicans are slimy enough to be car salesmen.

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. What can I get for 10 dollars? by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

    Apparently, either type of Hummer?

  44. So who's bidding for the "US Marine Corp" brand? by refactored · · Score: 1

    Chinese Economy: Designed in America.

    Designed in America... the folks that gave us the Madoff & Greenspan pyramid & bubble school of economics - and when all else fails... Send in the Marines!

  45. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Range Rover and Jaguar were bought by Tata Motors, an Indian company.

  46. The New Hummer Is STILL RETARDED..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    GM completely ruined the Hummer with their godforsaken pile of wheeled plastic crap.

    Sold it to a Chinese company? So what. Now that same godforsaken pile of wheeled plastic crap will fall apart when you turn set the car alarm.

    HUMVEER = HUMMER

    GM HUMMER = PURE SHIT

    Let GM rot.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  47. Hope and Change by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    So how is that hope and change working out for you.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
    1. Re:Hope and Change by romanval · · Score: 0, Troll

      So with 4 months on the clock, Obama single handedly made a 100-year old company turn bankrupt?? HAHAHA tell me another one!

  48. What I think is the real reason for auto bailouts. by Animixer · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I will get modded to heck for this, but I think it is in the best interests of our country to try and keep the automakers afloat.

    Not for jobs, or iconic brands, or saving face; those are good side effects if they work.

    Think about what the big automakers produced during the late 1930s to mid 1940s.

    Making cars is just something to keep the plants busy and keep a skilled manufacturing force around should we ever need to ramp up quickly again.

    --
    man tunefs | grep fish
  49. A pair of Chrysler men, now vindicated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now, I'm betting that Michael Nitz and Richard Ebens are feeling quite vindicated for their actions against someone; they may have mistaken China for Japan but certainly weren't off the mark on saying who'd take their jobs - the Chinese.

  50. Ok, now where's their hearing? by sethstorm · · Score: 0, Troll

    There are national security implications in selling off that particular brand.

    Never mind the entire bit about China being the eternally broken copier, creating junk wherever it goes.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  51. Market Schmarket by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

    The market handled GM alright...Watch out RIAA/MPAA your industries are next. The market will handle you as well.

    Since "handled" in GM's case means "left to government to bail out with tens of billions of taxpayers' dollars", I sincerely hope that "the market" does not do the same for those culture thieves.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  52. Let 'em have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Hummer (all models) is possibly Detroits biggest source of embarrassment since the Edsel.

    The only people who buy them are ass-hats. They suck as an off-road vehicle, and they suck worse as an on-road vehicle.

    Hey, GM, take the capital injection and blow it on another severance package !

    America, F&$K Yeah !

  53. Being Chinese... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    ...this leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

    1. Re:Being Chinese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being Chinese...this leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

      A bad taste in the mouth is kind of expected when you supply hummers.

  54. Oriental know-how and cheap American Labor by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    > Dealer network is still going to be American. So, you'll probably
    > be stuck buying your hummers from fat truck guys, as per usual.

    Despite being owned by a Chinese company. production will remain in the US for a couple of years, being built by UAW types who recently took a pay cut. Yes folks, it's the ultimate combo of Oriental know-how, and cheap American labor.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  55. Another American Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sold to the chineese.

    Whats next? The statue of Liberty?

    Dear God, lets hope the Chineese never cash in and collect all the US Debt they bought up over the years.

  56. Re:What I think is the real reason for auto bailou by umghhh · · Score: 1

    You mean the only reason a country should not outsource all of its industry abroad and live off of financial wizardry is that it is difficult to buy tanks from enemy when one needs them?

  57. Apparently, the Chinese still have a few ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... things too learn, since I've never seen a Chinese saying along the lines of:

    "If you try to swim in rough water, the first thing to do is _not_ to chain an iron ball to your ankle."

  58. Sounds like a movie by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Successor to 300. 5013, in which 5013 fat guys in leather knickers drive Hummers to defeat the Persians. Who unfortunately have M1A1s.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  59. Why buy Hummer by ebonum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt the Chinese are interested in building Hummers. However, they are very very interested in owning the intellectual property rights to certain components such as engines and transmissions. Once they are legally in the clear and have a good design, they will be able to build and sell a car for the US market.

    Disclosure - I live in China.

    1. Re:Why buy Hummer by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Once they are legally in the clear and have a good design, they will be able to build and sell a car for the US market.

      Disclosure - I live in China.

      [accent type="Cartman Chinese"] Hurro ferrow Chinese! Please to be explaining the lest of pran to be taking over Amelica? I forget! [/accent]

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  60. Not-so-happy Ending by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Aw come on man !

    I already have a tough time explaining why I go to the Chinese massage parlor !

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  61. US citizen is more ambiguous than American by bkaul · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that referring to citizens of the "united states" is actually much more ambiguous, since Mexico is officially "Estados Unidos Mexicanos" ... "Estados Unidos" = "United States"

    The United States of America is the only nation with "America" in its name, on the other hand, and the word "American" standing alone in English means a person from the USA. Let's get over the politically correct nonsense and stop trying to butcher the language.

  62. The new 2011 Hummer by EEGeek · · Score: 1

    The new 2011 Hummer now comes with happy ending!

  63. Technically by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    The military version is not a "HumVee", but a HMMWV (High Mobility Multi-purpose Wheeled Vehicle).

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  64. Oh! me sooo horny! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    Chinese hummer for Joe? Five dollar.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  65. H2 H3 by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

    I think what you mean to say was "The H2 and H3 were abominations that should have never been built."
    As a semi-serious 4x4 guy I have driven just about every 4x4 out there. The original H1 (Not the military one.) was a pretty good off road vehicle. Not great. There is not a truly great 4x4 on the market right now. If someone puts one out that is simple, robust, and customizable, they will find a substantial market waiting for them.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  66. Who buys them? Paying customers by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Who are these 5,013 douchebags still buying Hummers? =P

    You're making a joke, but many people would take that question seriously, as if it's some crime. People should be able to drive whatever they damn well please, if they can meet the expenses.

    I've never liked the Hummer personally, and think it's a bit ridiculous. But I also think the hatred for it is as silly and vapid as the adoration for the Prius. Both share one overwhelming trait; their greatest value in the eyes of those that drive them is that of being a status symbol, literally a way to telling other drivers "I'm better than you".

    So ironically, the eco-weenies that criticize Hummer drivers have much more in common with them than they'd ever like to admit.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Who buys them? Paying customers by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      But I also think the hatred for it is as silly and vapid as the adoration for the Prius. Both share one overwhelming trait; their greatest value in the eyes of those that drive them is that of being a status symbol, literally a way to telling other drivers "I'm better than you".

      So ironically, the eco-weenies that criticize Hummer drivers have much more in common with them than they'd ever like to admit.

      I see. So the 45 to 50 MPG that a Prius gets has no value to the owner at all. Truly yours is a dizzying intellect.

      While I understand that some people consider cars to be a status symbol that is hardly the only reason to drive a vehicle, let alone an SUV (which some people believe they need for kids or haulage) or a hybrid (which some people believe saves the Earth, but most just don't want to pay for gas).

  67. Mod parent up, facts != troll. by cwcpetech · · Score: 1

    There are national security implications in selling off that particular brand. Never mind the entire bit about China being the eternally broken copier, creating junk wherever it goes. One need only see the parallels between the Lenovo case and the IBM one. Second, China has not been known for quality throughout history.

  68. England == UK by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quibble: it was the UK, not England

    Outside the UK, mostly everyone calls the UK, England.

    Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales might as well not exist.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:England == UK by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's just ignorance though, and doesn't make it right. It's quite insulting to the people of those other countries within the UK. Don't perpetuate the mistake.

    2. Re:England == UK by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Partially true. Most people know Scotland and Ireland are real countries and refer to them as such. Many people aren't aware Wales is more than "western England" or think it's an autonomous county/district. And then the Isle of Man is another, separate country. I think Jersey (another island) is it's own country, just off the coast of France near the channel.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:England == UK by imtheguru · · Score: 1

      John Stripe, in The Memorials of Thomas Cranmer, writes:

        "It is a small error, but being so oft repeated deserveth to be observed into corrected. The name of that archbishop was Thomas Becket; nor can it otherwise have found to be written in any authentic history, record, calendar, or other book."

        "If the vulgar did formerly, as it doth now, call him 'Thomas à Becket' their mistake is not to be followed by learned men."

      Source: [http://www.freewebs.com/qitranscripts/301.htm]

      --
      Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
      A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
  69. US finally using head! by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Outsourcing pollution = smart.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  70. Hummer by Chiindi · · Score: 1

    I got a hummer from a Chinese Ho in Hong Kong!

  71. that's because they are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stretched hummers, by way more than a measly meter, are quite common in the US. So what's most likely to have occurred? 1) Some shitty UK importer did a bad job on the conversion? 2) The HMMV-derived chassis is so horrible that it can barely hold itself together? Let's think about this...

    1. Re:that's because they are idiots by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Well, since they're imported already converted... Since cars in the US aren't required to pass safety inspections, it seems they can get away with really horrible welding jobs.

  72. What about Napoleon? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    Wasn't he delusional and French? They did, however make some poor tactical decisions as did the UK. The UK was harder for the Germans to get to or they would have conquered that country just as easily. The Germans may have even still been able to pull it off if they hadn't done the stupid thing and invaded the USSR. I don't think the French are a bunch of surrender monkeys. In fact I think they maintain more nuke than any other country in the EU. I wouldn't mess with them.

    1. Re:What about Napoleon? by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      Maybe it has to do with the fact that Britain is surrounded by the sea? A ground offensive may have been rather hard under those circumstances.

      I'm not claiming that all Americans are delusional. Let's just say that a few main protagonists of the FGOP and (Former Grand Ol' Party) definitely show signs of delusion. Just think of the ex "we don't torture" veep (reminds me more and more of an ugly version of the ex-Iraqi information minister), who suddenly came crawling out of the bunker, which he never left during his presidency. Or the curerent ideological leaders of the FGOP. Here we have Mr. Limbaugh, a thrithe divorced drug addict and Miss Coulter, an anorexic bimbo with nothing really to say, which she compensates by screeching. Oh, and let's not forget "hockey mom goes clothes shopping for 150k" Governor Palin. I would call those folks pretty delusional (let alone hypocritical).

      I don't disagree with your assessment about WW2, btw, just wanted to point out why it may have been a tad harder to run over the Brits.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    2. Re:What about Napoleon? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I think there is a lot of delusional people on both sides of the Atlantic. The UK was surrounded by sea and it would have been hard, but if the Germans would have concentrated on the airfields for air superiority instead of retribution bombing of cites, I think they could have made it work. Hitler was arrogant and didn't think the UK mattered much anyhow. Limbaugh, Dr. Phil, Opera, reality shows etc. really suck. But, you have similar stuff in the UK. I haven't studied up enough on France to know if there is anything similar there. I do know that there is just as many if not more tabloids in the UK as the US.

      Limbaugh is real prick IMO. He wanted all people on drugs punished severely, but because he supposedly got addicted because of his back being operated on, I suppose that is OK. He still has a lot of elderly people fooled over here but not me. He is just a plain ordinary junkie. IMO jail is an expensive an infective way to solve that problem. He has no right to criticize anyone, but still does and it is a damn shame that some listen. MOD me down but he is just a shade above a Neo-Nazi to me.

  73. GM did not buy Saturn by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It's pretty clear that the Saturn product turned to crap after GM bought Saturn. It's pretty clear that the Saturn product turned to crap after GM bought Saturn.

    GM did not buy Saturn. Saturn was started in 1985 as a subsidiary of GM in order to compete with the perceived Japanese threat. It did well for a while but eventually was ignored by GM and starved of capital for years. Saturn has ALWAYS been a part of GM from the moment it was founded. It was operated outside the normal GM reporting structure for a while but the owner was GM.

  74. Foreign auto suppliers are local by sjbe · · Score: 1

    With Toyota you're supporting a few thousand schlubs being paid a decent wage to work in a factory.

    A few thousand? Try tens of thousands across their various operating companies plus the extensive supply base, much of which is here in the US. Toyota makes close to half of the vehicles they sell in the US right here in the US. Last year that was approximately 1 million vehicles. (they make more in Japan but most of those are sold elsewhere in the world - they only import a bit over 1 million vehicles annually) You can't build that many vehicles locally and import all the parts. The currency risk and lead times would make it impossible. Furthermore the dollar has been weakening which would make it more expensive to bring parts from overseas to the US.

    With the domestic you're supporting not just the people who build the cars but also the parts. Toyota and Honda don't build their parts here, they ship them from oversea's.

    You couldn't be more wrong. That hasn't been true for a LONG time. I've been in the plants where they make parts for Toyota right here in the US. I've seen the frames for the Toyota Tacoma, Sequoia and Tundra being assembled with my own eyes and even helped optimize the lines. It's simply not economical to make and ship every or even most parts from Japan if the assembly occurs here in the US. The logistics get too difficult for a Just-In-Time system like Toyota uses - most of the parts HAVE to be made close to where assembly occurs. Furthermore there are joint ventures like NUMMI. If you go to a Honda dealer they list the percentage of parts made in the US versus made in Japan. A current model Civic has about 20% of the parts made in Japan and most of the rest are made in either the US or Canada and assembly happens in Ohio. Supply chains are global these days.

    The manufacturing base that is built up around these domestic guys is what is most valuable to us as a country.

    Most of those suppliers, especially the large ones, supply both foreign and domestic auto makers. In fact it is a problem for Toyota and other auto makers if GM goes under because they share a non-trivial amount of their supply base. I used to work for one of the 10 biggest auto suppliers. Just over 55% of their business was domestic and the rest was overseas. The largest single client was one of the big three (Chrysler at the time if memory serves) and it accounted for somewhere north of 12% of the company's business at the time. The other big Tier One suppliers in the US depend on the Big 3 but most of them have plenty of business with non-US based automakers too. Don't get me wrong, losing the Big 3 business would hurt the supply base a lot but don't have any illusions about the nature of the supply base.