Slashdot Mirror


Linux To Be First OS To Support USB 3.0

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Neowin.net "Sarah Sharp, a self-styled 'geekess' and Linux developer at Intel's Open Source Technology Center who has recently been working on the Linux USB subsystem, announced on her blog that support of USB 3.0 will soon be integrated into the Linux kernel. This makes Linux the first operating system to support the standard. If you can't wait and have the expertise necessary, she includes instructions on how to get USB 3.0 support in Linux now." Here's Sharp's post.

296 comments

  1. Even better on my Linux box... by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Linux box goes to USB 11

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:Even better on my Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misread your Linux box: it's not really 11, it's 1.1!

    2. Re:Even better on my Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You better go to the doctor. I think you may be pregnant.

      Think about it before you mod me off-topic.

  2. Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Linux the first for the original USB too? Well that, or USB 2.0

    1. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      USB 2.0. I'll guarantee you that USB 1.x was running on Windows long before linux. >.> .

    2. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by wgoodman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      and on Apple computers far before then..

    3. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah yeah yeah Apple had USB in the 1930s because they are just so awesome. Don't you get tired of defending a company you probably have 0 shares in and is...just a company. Maybe if you Apple guys kept things on technical merit and not what's "cool at starbucks" then maybe people would take you seriously.

    4. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or maybe you should put the troll-smacking stick down and realize that Apple did indeed have USB in their home computers before anyone else did.

      At least they got that right... USB is an extremely useful thing to have around.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by heffrey · · Score: 1

      With pleasure. You are wrong.

    6. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      No, Windows beat Linux on USB 1.1 and 2.0. Although Linux was first with AMD64 support. I can't think of too many other Linux "firsts" though.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Apple did indeed have USB in their home computers before anyone else did.

      Consciously transitioning away was a better option than waiting for ApplePort (or whatever it was called) to die from lack of demand. Just look at PS/2. Only recently have computers been shipped without it.

    8. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The 1930's. The decade that brought you the Depression, the Nazis, batshit crazy Japanese militarists attempting genocide in China and Stalin's purges. It sort of makes sense USB was invented then.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by MrMr · · Score: 1

      You're garantuee isn't worth much. Apple and Solaris had USB drivers in 1998, Windows partial support in 2000 and Linux in 2001.

    10. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you should put the troll-smacking stick down and realize that Apple did indeed have USB in their home computers before anyone else did.

      That factually isn't true either, virtually everything had USB hardware on board when the original iMac came out. The drivers were a mess until Win98 a month later though.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    11. Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Who cares about firsts anyway. Microsoft teaches us that only thirds matter.

  3. bleeding edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bleeding edge ;)

  4. Another win for OSS community by adosch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chalk one up for Intel and Linux kernel OSS support! IMHO, a big milestone in the fact that Linux kernel development is always teetering on the bleeding edge. This isn't going to change much for the novice user unless distro's do their part and package in the kernel support for it, but for the more savvy users and testers, it's going to help USB 3.0 mature very quickly and get the bugs worked out faster. I dig it.

    1. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing a huge point, though. While Linux may be the first OS to support USB 3.0, devices that make use of USB 3.0 will still not have drivers.

    2. Re:Another win for OSS community by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linux: more bleeding edge than a pussy on the rag.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Another win for OSS community by Vanders · · Score: 5, Informative

      devices that make use of USB 3.0 will still not have drivers.

      That's simply not true. The USB 3.0 spec. is mostly concerned with the phy. & bus. The xHCI spec covers the HCD. The software-level device interfaces have not changed, or have changed very little.

    4. Re:Another win for OSS community by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm only making an educated guess, but it seems to me that the drivers for the actual device don't change much.

      For example: the same USB HID drivers work on 1 or 2. The very same network driver works on my internal ethernet port and my ExpressCard.

      Kind of like how WoW doesn't care if you're on wired or wireless, any decent driver should be high-level enough not to care if you're on USB 2 or 3.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    5. Re:Another win for OSS community by maxume · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of the rag to take the edge off of the bleeding?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Another win for OSS community by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      This isn't going to change much for anyone. I wasn't even aware there were consumer devices/computers that were shipping with USB 3 ports yet.

    7. Re:Another win for OSS community by Zencyde · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot + talking about menstruation = NO!

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    8. Re:Another win for OSS community by maxume · · Score: 1

      It is no different than any other wonder of nature.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Another win for OSS community by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      Eumenorrhea denotes normal, regular menstruation that lasts for a few days (usually 3 to 5 days, but anywhere from 2 to 7 days is considered normal).[2] The average blood loss during menstruation is 35 millilitres with 10-80 mL considered normal;[3] many women also notice shedding of the endometrium lining that appears as tissue mixed with the blood. (Sometimes this is erroneously thought to indicate an early-term miscarriage of an embryo.) An enzyme called plasmin â" contained in the endometrium â" tends to inhibit the blood from clotting. Because of this blood loss, premenopausal women have higher dietary requirements for iron to prevent iron deficiency. Many women experience uterine cramps, also referred to as dysmenorrhea, during this time, caused largely by the contractions of the uterine muscle as it expels the endometrial blood from the woman's body. A vast industry has grown to provide drugs to aid in these cramps, as well as sanitary products to help manage menses.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    10. Re:Another win for OSS community by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Plus it's better for sex: The lubrication eliminates the need for boring and time-consuming foreplay, and the increased blood flow "down there" helps the ladies with their cramps. Just be more gentle than usual all-around and lay down plenty of black towels.

      Then, when you're done, immediately throw the towels in the washing machine and have a shower together. Just don't look down at the drain unless you're into Norman Bates.

      +1 speaking from experience ^_^

    11. Re:Another win for OSS community by Curtman · · Score: 3, Informative

      The software-level device interfaces have not changed, or have changed very little.

      According to this:

      USB 3.0, which will also be called SuperSpeed USB, will be backward compatible with current USB devices, and will support transfer speeds of up to 4.8Gb/sec (600MB/Sec)--which is ten times faster than Hi-Speed USB (USB 2.0).

      There's some good info in that article.

    12. Re:Another win for OSS community by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the Slashdot community was open for all kinds of fetishes... ;(

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    13. Re:Another win for OSS community by LizardKing · · Score: 5, Informative

      Err, Mrs LizardKing once said that she'd attempted sex when she had the painters in, and that it was uncomfortable because the menstrual blood caused chafing. Apparently a ladies "red wee" is a bit like unstrained orange juice - it's got bits in it.

      And no, I can hardly believe we're discussing menstruation on Slashdot. In response to an article about a serial interface.

    14. Re:Another win for OSS community by PayPaI · · Score: 4, Funny

      decent driver

      You lost me.

    15. Re:Another win for OSS community by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that I can...also, thanks for the visual there, now if you excuse me, I'm gonna go gouge my eyes out with a rusty wooden spoon. kthnxbai

    16. Re:Another win for OSS community by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 0, Troll

      USB isn't really 'a serial interface.' It's an abomination. A big trap to block access to the PC, foisted on us all by Bill Gates and his cohorts.

      Anybody with a reasonable understanding of port-based I/O can code a 16550 chip to talk to the world, and to a 'legacy' PC. And 'software UARTS' are a staple of embedded programming. The USB is a large overly-complex blot whose design is to make sure nobody connects anything to a PC anymore without paying a stiff entry fee. It poses neat PIC microcontroller based peripherals with the reality that a $30 USB dongle* (a USB to RS-232C adapter) will act as a barrier to adoption.

      You don't even need any hardware to do a simple serial interface on an embedded controller. For USB you need to slap on a whole expensive dedicated chip.

      (*the fucks who work at marketing jobs at the big box stores will SNEER at you if you ask after one. "Isn't that obsoolete?")

    17. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing is that I can...also, thanks for the visual there, now if you excuse me, I'm gonna go gouge my eyes out with a rusty wooden spoon. kthnxbai

      I want a rusty wooden spoon for that, i was gonna use a regular wooden spoon but the rust must cause more damage and therefore be more effective.

    18. Re:Another win for OSS community by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      For USB you need to slap on a whole expensive dedicated chip.

      Not to mention extra code.

    19. Re:Another win for OSS community by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Menstrual flow makes a pretty damn poor lubricant compared to vaginal secretions... and like LizardKing mentioned, it's got solids in it. It's a bit awkward compared to "normal" sex.

      You have the towels and shower part right, though.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    20. Re:Another win for OSS community by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mrs LizardKing once said that she'd attempted sex when she had the painters in,

      As in, not with you? Try using the personal pronoun "I" before you experiment with sex. Disclaimer: my girlfriends and I were younger than menopause when we experimented with period sex. If you can't properly lubricate then just spit on it.

      As if you were just saying, "Half-digested period blood-chunks are brown". Yes, nerds, they are. If you can't handle it then go to Digg and beat your dicks for eternity while the real men turn their women into jelly using their mud tires.

    21. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey ethanol-fueled, just thought I'd let you know that the comments on your Professional Trolls journal are archived. Not sure if you knew, since it still has "Please post suggestions" all over it.

    22. Re:Another win for OSS community by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't at all flinch if you were correct, but are you absolutely sure there are no legitimate reasons for USB other than more money for companies? How about Firewire? I always was under the impression that the point was to make the interfaces smarter (by adding chips) so that the OS could be dumber, but if it would be easier to make a standardized interface/API for device communication using an alternate system, then you're essentially claiming that there is nothing holding back hardware companies from making a system that is much better. So then the question is, why doesn't it exist yet then? Parallel and serial connectors are very big and bulky, so a similar but smaller adapter would have to be created. Not saying that can't be done as it IS done, just look inside laptops sometime at all their connectors, but I'm just confused as to why the market hasn't provided that.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    23. Re:Another win for OSS community by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      Except the kind that hurts someone or is negative/mean, but fortunately the only problem with that for me is it made my stomach churn a bit. :D

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    24. Re:Another win for OSS community by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      I realize that insisting microsoft is the bad guy is a good way to score some karma on /. , but you may want to check reality once in a while.

      MS had only a minor role in the creation of USB. Intel and IBM did most of the heavy lifting as I recall.

      Aside from that, USB provides a great many uses that a standard serial interface would never have been able to accomplish. It's the closest thing to a universal interface that we have ever gotten into wide use. As a geek, you should be happy about that. The fact that it's less than perfect really shouldn't be your main point of interest, besides, until you hack together the next universal interface, get it into a significant portion of the devices on the planet and do so without any flaws, you might want to hold onto those stones you are throwing.

    25. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, sure, but, what about other drivers, like, uhmm, my cheap and, from a couple moths, out of vendor support, integrated ATI graphics?
      The open source driver really sucks, and the official ATI driver isn't compatible with ubuntu jaunty, and it will be no updated for "old" graphics card, like mine (ATI 740G = Radeon 2100).
      If you look at Ubuntu forums or IRC channels, you will see much more people with the same issue.
      This is not necessarily the case of others driver developmen teams. For example: I had had recently another mobo (with integrated graphics, VIA P4M890) and really, I have seen what a good work has done the openchrome team with its driver.
      Excuse me for being so hard, but I think there is some other things with much more priority than improving a graphics card performance, but I don't think that supporting unreleased devices is between them.
      Obviously, all this was from the point of view of a (particular) linux desktop user.
      (Please excuse me, English is not my birth language.)

    26. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was your hand doing with the painters?

    27. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here was I thinking it was the kind with claws.

      Learn something new everyday.

    28. Re:Another win for OSS community by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      As in, not with you?

      No. Based on experience with a former girlfriend, I can safely say that it makes a terrible mess of the sheets. And at least with some women, menstrual discharge can smell decidedly unpleasant.

    29. Re:Another win for OSS community by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Informative

      What was your hand doing with the painters?

      It's a British expression for menstruation. Alternatives include:

      • up on the blocks
      • on the blob
      • rag day
      • Arsenal playing at home
      • having Auntie round for tea

      I suggest you check out The Profanisaurus for the full list

    30. Re:Another win for OSS community by dotancohen · · Score: 1
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    31. Re:Another win for OSS community by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Slashdot + talking about menstruation = NO!

      But how can you trust something which bleeds for five days and doesn't die?

      (I'm not a misogynist, I'm just parroting a superficially misogynistic joke which is funny not due to its misogyny but its shock-and-surprise value. "So there", or something...)

    32. Re:Another win for OSS community by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      USB 3.0, which will also be called SuperSpeed USB

      After that is USB 4.0, which will also be called LudicrousSpeed USB.

    33. Re:Another win for OSS community by hmar · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that it was Apple that forced USB out into the market as a serious interface..

    34. Re:Another win for OSS community by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      You don't even need any hardware to do a simple serial interface on an embedded controller. For USB you need to slap on a whole expensive dedicated chip.
      Or use a microcontroller with the functionality built in, for example the PIC18F2550.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    35. Re:Another win for OSS community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well - at least it's an article about plugging, so to speak.

    36. Re:Another win for OSS community by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Yes, as a matter of fact it does, the splinters give you tetanus. Its a feature!

  5. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And I'll adopt it after it's been out for a while and everyone else works the bugs out.

    I don't want first, I want stable.

    1. Re:yay by TCM · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't want first, I want stable.

      Then why are you using Linux in the first place? :)

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    2. Re:yay by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      He must be using Debian stable, not Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian Sid

  6. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks good to me:
    http://sarah.thesharps.us/

  7. Any USB 3.0 hardware? by moon3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?

    1. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. If you can get the development hardware. Actual consumer devices won't be out till 2010, with maybe a few in 2009.

    2. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Devices, I would be more concerned about finding a hardware adaptor to install into your computer first. The devices come after you have something you can plug them into.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asus and Gigabyte both have USB 3.0 mobos.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by sorak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?

      Mod me troll if you want, but the majority of the devices won't come until Windows has USB 3.0 support.

    5. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if on your recommendation I buy this USB 3.0 MB. Do you have any recommendations on 3.0 devices to plug into it? There are none at the moment. So its wait for a year THEN buy the better stuff...

    6. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      geekoid said that Asus and Gigabyte have 3.0 motherboards... I would surmise that they include third-party drivers on the CD.

  8. About time! by syousef · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I was waiting for USB3 support! Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows. Drivers? What are they? Oh and when can I buy a USB4 powered reading light?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:About time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Drivers? What are they?

      USB 3.0 doesn't significantly change any of the class definitions. The standard USB drivers will need little, if any, changes to fully support USB 3.0 devices.

    2. Re:About time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was waiting for USB3 support! Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows.

      No because nobody will make devices that only work on a useless OS. When 7 gets USB3 support, then devices will come out.

  9. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just follow the link.

    Kinda chunky but cute. Reminds me of Heather Graham with a few extra pounds. Not bad, and a geek even better.

  10. The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    like Doctor or Actor.

    Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek. Please, clearly you are all geek.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      actor? actress

    2. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      My mother isn't a particularly progressive person, but she was quite clear when she told me that adding a feminine suffix to a professional noun is demeaning.

      Geek isn't exactly a professional noun, but it's close enough.

    3. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you are thinking of the word, "Actress". Try to pick better examples next time.

    4. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

      Okay, what about geekette?

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    5. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.

      Why exactly? Although not productive anymore, the -ess morpheme is used in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.

      Why does her choice of neologism mean she's a "sub geek?"

    6. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell modded the above post "Interesting"? Informative would be more accurate.

      "Geekess" is equally as retarded as "webmistress". Yes, because the term "webmaster" implies male gender. Uhh, what?

    7. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about geek with pendulous tits?
      That is still gender neutral.

    8. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by SBrach · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Actor is the correct word for both male and female.

    9. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about geek with pendulous tits?
      That is still gender neutral.

      and on Slashdot it isn't even gender indicative

    10. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Actor is the correct word for both male and female.

      No, "actor" is a (not "the") correct word for either male and female; it is also not incorrect to use it specifically to refer to males.

      "Actress" is also a correct word, specifically for female.

    11. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by cripeon · · Score: 1

      So, what would you say a "geekoid" is? A geeky android?

    12. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by SBrach · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you are looking for a sexist way to refer to a female actor then i suppose you are correct.

    13. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by setagllib · · Score: 1

      When did "master of the house" ever mean a woman? The master/mistress word divide has been there since before electricity.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    14. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it's a nonsense word.

      Like Doctoress or Plumberess.

      It is forced into the vocabulary by women who, for some reason, feel equal means making up new words. I blame Hollywood for being to afraid to correct it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by sexconker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope.
      The correct word is actor.
      Same for waiter, steward etc.

      If you're talking about titles, such as Count, or Duke, or Prince, you can go to Countess, or Duchess, or Princess if the position itself gives powers/responsibilities specifically to the wife of the holder (and thus there is actually a separate title to take on).

      A (male) Steward of an estate or position being married would not (usually) confer any responsibilities or powers upon his wife, and thus, a Steward's wife was NOT a Stewardess.
      A (female) Steward's husband would not have a separate title either.

      Today (in the US) the only one I can think of is First Lady. Were we to have a female President, I expect a full month of Wolf Blitzer and crew debating what to call her husband. Hollywood already nailed down "Madame President" (analogous to "Mr. President") through various TV shows and movies.

      Congressman and Congresswoman are incorrect.
      Senator and Representative are correct. The two are designed to be separate, dammit. Having two Houses of Congress means literally having two damned buildings and bodies (houses) of meeting (congress) that are separate.
      If you really need a term for a member of either one, Congressionor is a pretty bad-ass-sounding title.

    16. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A miniature geek?

      Geek is gender neutral. It's doesn't really need anything else. I mean, I might refer to my 8 years old child as a 'geekette'.

      My she wants to be a scientistsess~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Although never productive, the -ess morpheme is used incorrectly in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.

      Fixed that for you.

      Consider the cigar and the cigarette.
      Pirouette and pirouet.

    18. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Maybe where you come from but for me it so isn't.

      In a sense, yes, when the referring to a mixture of male and female, or person of unknown gender we defer to the male term.

      Going back a generation, an actress was a woman and an actor a man. Somewhere along the line, political correctness and feminism got mixed up and decided that the male term would henceforth be used for both. So instead of the awards 'Best Actor' and 'Best Actress' we have abominably bloated misuse of the language with 'Best Male Actor' and 'Best Female Actor'. If the sanitization of the language were truly to treat women equal with men there would be no need for positive discrimination in having a separate award for an actress - i.e. Women would compete with men for the same trophy. That would of course cut the Oscar ceremony in half.

      I'm all for gender rights but I think adopting the hitherto male/neuter words actually removes some of the colour from the language. Whenever I hear terms such as 'female actor' in deference to 'actress', it's like god kills a kitten. :(

    19. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      What's your point?

      Cigar & cigarette uses the "-ette" suffix to mean "small".
      Actor and actress uses the "-ess" suffix to mean "woman".

      They're different suffixes entirely. "-ess" always means woman, "-ette" always means small. The former may be archaic and unpopular these days, but the meaning is still clear.

      http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=-ess&gwp=13
      http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=-ette&gwp=13

    20. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?

      For me it boils down to this:
      It is an un-need divide in a culture. Instead of being a group of geeks, we end up creating geeks and geekess's. Which seems to lead to an US v THEM aspect in everything it touches.

      True gender equality doesn't need this artificial line.

      Also, I look at history:
      Princess were inferior to prince, Goddess inferior to God.

      I don't think we need that any more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A person who wanted a unique sounding login without numbers that isn't likely to be taken by someone else.

      If I referred to myself as a geekoid, you would have a point.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Although never productive,

      I love it when people who don't know what they're talking about correct me. The -ess morpheme was a productive morpheme for feminine nouns in English, round about the 16th century. There are a number of borrowings into English from French that use -ess(e) which are feminine forms, but was also used to form novel feminine words, such as authoress, giantess, Jewess, patroness, poetess, priestess, quakeress, tailoress, seamstress, and songstress - none of which are borrowings.

      the -ess morpheme is used incorrectly in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.

      Except that, of course, there's nothing incorrect about it - outmoded perhaps, but an obvious fact in the lexicon.

      Consider the cigar and the cigarette.
      Pirouette and pirouet.

      Not sure what your point is; why not also consider:
      leather and leatherette (a kind of fake leather), or
      usher and usherette (a female usher).

    23. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Actress" is also a correct word, specifically for female.

      No, it's a nonsense word. Like Doctoress or Plumberess. It is forced into the vocabulary by women who, for some reason, feel equal means making up new words. I blame Hollywood for being to afraid to correct it.

      Dictionary.com (based on Random House Dictionary) disagrees. Given the late 16th century origin of actress, any nefarious feminist plot seems awfully unlikely. And it seems to me that the entertainment industry is moving toward using the gender-neutral actor, which Dictionary.com confirms in its discussion of -ess. We're generally moving away from -ess, but many such usages are still considered correct. A few might never go away.

      - T

    24. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      Somewhere along the line, political correctness and feminism got mixed up and decided that the male term would henceforth be used for both. So instead of the awards 'Best Actor' and 'Best Actress' we have abominably bloated misuse of the language with 'Best Male Actor' and 'Best Female Actor'. If the sanitization of the language were truly to treat women equal with men there would be no need for positive discrimination in having a separate award for an actress - i.e. Women would compete with men for the same trophy.

      Blowing hot and cold!

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    25. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can this guy be modded flamebait?

    26. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      forty years ago, "geek" would have meant she wanted to join the circus and bite the heads of off chickens or bats.

    27. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      chubettes, however, are women

    28. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please explain to me why this is sexist?

      Because prudes had trouble distinguishing in the past between an Actress and a Prostitute? Because casting directors used to be sexist? Should we use the male term for all female professions, or is this one special?

      I think it's time everyone got with the times and dropped all this 'Actor' bullshit for female actresses. It's absurd and carries baggage from the past that we simply shouldn't care about.

      The real sexism is assuming that we can't use a word because if the listener is a misogynistic sexist they might think the actress is actually a lady of ill repute.

    29. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by jabithew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congressionor is a pretty bad-ass-sounding title

      Maybe, but it's only one step away from Congressionator.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    30. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Well, a cigarette is physically smaller than a cigar, thus the dimunitive.

      I think there's a decent argument that your average woman is physically smaller than your average chair-bound mountain-dew lovin' male geek.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    31. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That says more about you than anyone else. Do you believe women are inferior ? If not, why can't they have their own titles ? What about hero and heroine ? It's simply a way of making each word more than the sum of its letters, but of course, especially in US english, you can't do that because it confuses the proles. So you end up with 2 words in the same sentence that mean the same thing. "And I also installed a new video card as well". Seriously, watching the discovery channel makes me mad. They pretend they are being serious and scientific and speak like uneducated street kids, reading it from a card. Quite often making huge logical blunders as a result. And as for things like CSI etc, don't get me started. One memorable one was Grissom saying, "terminal velocity is 9.8m/s" NO IT ISN'T ! Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s/s and terminal velocity is the speed reached DUE to that acceleration. Or on Numbers where gimboid explains how a rainbow works - "the water droplets split each colour up into its component parts" NO THEY DON'T ! the water droplets split white light into its component colours. I don't care if it matters to the story, stupid errors like that are indicative of how dumb the writers are.
      </RANT>

    32. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by eam · · Score: 1

      I always perferred the term "nerd", for that specific reason. I've always said a geek is someone who bites the heads off chickens.

    33. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by eam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, if I was really a nerd, I would check my sentences for typos...

    34. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Juggalo and Juggalette?

    35. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      Yep.

    36. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Acknowledgement of gender is sexist.

    37. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny
      What a typo!

      Acknowledgement of gender is not sexist.

    38. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      That would of course cut the Oscar ceremony in half.

      Is there a downside?

    39. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      If you really need a term for a member of either one, Congressionor is a pretty bad-ass-sounding title.

      Don't we prefer congress-critter?

    40. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?

      Because it is either shorter, or less confusing to write: "One of the actors (unidentified male member of the cats) had sex with one of the actresses (unidentified female member of the cast)", then: "One of the male actors (unidentified male member of the cast) had sex with one of the female actors (unidentified female member of the cast)", or "One of the actors (unidentified member of the cast) had sex with another one of the actors (unidentified member of the cast)". As you can see that last sentence tends to be interpreted significantly differently than the first.
      Second a princess was not inferior to a prince because the title was different, but because that society considered females inferior to males. Additionally, I know of no mythological pantheon where gods were inherently more powerful than goddesses.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    41. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by hmar · · Score: 1

      Why, exactly, is the fact of the difference considered sexist? The word "actress" holds no negative meaning, simply means "female actor". Is the word female sexist?

    42. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by hmar · · Score: 1

      In what society that worshipped both gods and goddesses were goddesses inferior to gods? The "Earth Mother" in many religions was the most important deity, and in Greek mythology, Athena (goddess of wisdom) was a tactically superior general over Aries (god of war) To actively deny the differences between male and female is to call attention to them. Use the word you are comfortable with, don't try to change the language of others, as you will never come accross as more than an asshole.

    43. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by sexconker · · Score: 1

      My point is that ette is in fact both a diminutive and an effeminate. It's from the French.

      My point is that ess is an effeminate that was shoehorned in about 500 years ago, for EVERYTHING. English is one of the least gendered languages there is, and that's a good thing.

      It serves no actual purpose in the vast majority of cases other than to emulate other languages that are heavily gendered.

    44. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Keep you arm chairs analyest at home.

      What it says to me is that being equal you don't need different titles, and that are often used to cause separation.

      Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s/s and terminal velocity is the speed reached DUE to that acceleration.
      NO IT ISN'T.

      Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s/s and terminal velocity is the speed reached DUE to that acceleration when acted on by another force, such as the air, or ground.

      "the water droplets split white light into its component colours. I "
      Also incorrect.
      It is a refraction of the frequencies of light.

      Don't use your pedantic tendencies to excuse away the fact that you just like being angry at stuff so you can feel superiour.
      See, I can do it to.

      It's TV, it will never be the accurate, never, ever. The better rant is how people assume anything presented on TV is assumed correct, unless it's a subject the viewer knows about. Same with Newspapers.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    45. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd be more scared of an Evil Sorceress than an Evil Sorcerer.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    46. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but "nerd" also had a different meaning when it was first used in the early 50s, not of being bookish or into intellectual pursuits, but merely of being a boring, uninteresting, by-the-book person, a "square". As far as anyone can tell, Dr. Seuss invented the term in his 1950 book "if I ran the zoo", a Nerd being some kind of creature narrator would keep at the zoo.

    47. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It serving no purpose is debatable- it denotes gender, which is a purpose unto itself. It's exactly the same purpose that is served in other languages; again, arguably an outdated and archaic purpose, but still a purpose all the same.

      The lady in TFS calls herself a "geekess", not a "geekette". If she were calling herself the latter I'd see the point of discussing whether she's really calling herself a diminutive sub-geek. But she isn't, so I don't really understand the discussion. She's using a suffix that always denotes femininity, so the meaning is pretty clear.

      Presumably she is using "geekess" as an analogue to "godess"- quite a favourable and glamorous use of the -ess suffix to denote gender. It would probably be sexist if being applied to her externally, but I'll defend her right to call herself whatever the hell she wants, if that's what she wants.

    48. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Oh she can call herself whatever she wants.
      Geekess is not a word, though, and gendered nouns are dumb.

    49. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because she knows it will produce MAD HITS on her website.

  11. Poor naming by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"

    Who keeps on doing this!! Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.
    Ditto for fast ethernet.

    1. Re:Poor naming by WinterSolstice · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe that would make the USB5 logo Plaid?

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:Poor naming by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Guess they decided to go for a Godwin award this time.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    3. Re:Poor naming by rcamans · · Score: 0, Troll

      We are already at ludicrous speed. Have you tried to launch or us any MS apps in Intel hardware that has less than dual core?
      Ludicrously slow.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    4. Re:Poor naming by Chabo · · Score: 1

      I see the "Superspeed", but I don't see an "SS". Do you mean the red and blue arrows?

      USB 2.0 was called "Hi-Speed", so if you don't like that designation, just use the version number.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    5. Re:Poor naming by maxume · · Score: 1

      At some point, they will rename it PC Plug.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Poor naming by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 1

      I'm so prepared for ludicrous speed!

    7. Re:Poor naming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That SS really confused me.. In Holland we have a not so positive meaning associated with those two letters (same for SA) they are the only two letter combination that is not allowed in license plates for example.

    8. Re:Poor naming by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it

      At first glance, I read that as "superceded". Sounds about right.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:Poor naming by fast+turtle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope. USB 4.0 will have "OMG Ponies" as it's moniker

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    10. Re:Poor naming by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Less than dual core? You mean single?

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    11. Re:Poor naming by SteveAyre · · Score: 1

      I think he means the USB 3.0 trident logo:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USB_3.0_Icon.svg

    12. Re:Poor naming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.

      M-M-M-M Monster Speed...

    13. Re:Poor naming by sorak · · Score: 1

      The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"

      Who keeps on doing this!! Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5. Ditto for fast ethernet.

      Oh, I thought you were referring to the use of an acronym shared by Nazis. Don't they have someone there who can check out their acronyms to verify that they are not associated with any notorious hate groups?

      But you do have a point about relative speed designations. I remember the days of double density floppies, follwed by "high density".

    14. Re:Poor naming by jabelli · · Score: 1

      3m might have a problem with that.

    15. Re:Poor naming by rcamans · · Score: 1

      single core, with or without hyperthreading, yes.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  12. It means almost nothing by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I may have to preface this with the fact that I am a hard core Linux user. I run Mac OS on the wife's machines. I have a WindowsXP VM. That's about it for me personally. I use Linux exclusively and favorably. But what I have to say is the objective truth the way I see it... objectively.

    It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers. It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support. Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!"

    Linux isn't entitled to bragging rights of any kind. Sure we have snazzy 3D OpenGL desktops with cubes and spheres. Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far). There are lots of games natively written for Linux though not the ones someone wants to play usually... (No WoW and no chance in hell of an OpenGL version of XWing vs. Tie Fighter....)

    The point is what Linux has is completely unimportant to others... even when they DON'T have it. What is important is what Linux doesn't have.

    Still, I'll chalk this little bullet point up in Linux's favor... but at the same time, none of it matters until really useful USB 3.0 devices are available and at that time there WILL be Windows drivers and support and there WILL be Mac OS X support. "Sure, you had it first... but what could you do with it?"

    (I'll still get modded troll)

    1. Re:It means almost nothing by selven · · Score: 0

      Open source did a lot of things first. Tabbed browsing, multiple desktops, there are probably a lot of things.

    2. Re:It means almost nothing by gbarules2999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tabbed browsing

      Cue the Opera fanboys.

    3. Re:It means almost nothing by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

      Neither Amiga (Virtual desktops in 1985) or NeWS (tabbed windows and browsing, 1988) were open source.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far).

      Yeah you can't do that on Windows. Oh, wait..

    5. Re:It means almost nothing by ksheff · · Score: 1

      One would think that it wouldn't be odd to have a hardware manufacturer use an OS that they can change as they see fit in order to develop and test new hardware.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    6. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WoW runs on WINE, biznatch.

    7. Re:It means almost nothing by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      It will matter if, in 6 months, Linux ARM laptops are shipping with USB 3.0 enabled.

    8. Re:It means almost nothing by dangitman · · Score: 1

      It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers. It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support. Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!"

      You must keep some pretty bad company. Most of the world has moved on from that mentality.

      (I'll still get modded troll)

      Uh... why?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:It means almost nothing by bkaul · · Score: 1

      (I'll still get modded troll)

      Employing a bit of reverse psychology there?

    10. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given all the ARM-based trinkets that can barely saturate their 100BaseT NICs nor USB 2 external HDDs, it will be pretty funny and sad when they stick USB 3 on them and claim it is "super speed". Kind of like those little NAS devices which have 1000BaseT NICs but cannot reach anywhere near the speed that their HDDs are capable of, due to CPU bottlenecks.

    11. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, this means nothing because unlike linux, i KNOW my usb3 device will have working drivers for windows when i buy it.

      i guess the linux crowd will take any victory they can....

    12. Re:It means almost nothing by erroneus · · Score: 1

      The last reply to my original comment would seem to indicate that I was more or less correct.

      I have found that there are "professionals" out there who have a lot of rank, prestige, reputation and knowledge based on the Windows platform. These people are reluctant to become a "newbie" even for a little while when it comes to working with other technologies. Even though they didn't "always know" what they know about Windows and the apps and utilities that they use, they use "don't know" as a reason not to use Linux in any given role. It rather amazes me to some degree. But it's pretty easy to understand why, when you are "king of this hill" you would be reluctant to move on to another hill where you are not king.

      Personally, I am rather agnostic on the matter and see a bigger picture. But others are pretty much tied to their favorites and familiar territories. I have been in several IT shops where people become both offensive and defensive when someone introduces Linux and pick on Linux without reasonable cause whenever any problem arises.

    13. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have WoW, too.

    14. Re:It means almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amiga did not have Virtual Desktops, it had Virtual Screens. Two different things.

  13. But surely M$ will be a close second, very soon... by Klistvud · · Score: 1

    ... filing for Chapter 7. Oops, I meant following with Windows 7.

    --
    Intellectual Property: an immaterial non-entity, most fiercely contended by those with no proper intellect to speak of.
  14. Post to negate bad moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry ...

  15. Re:Could someone post a link? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    I'm sure we would all like to interface with her USB..... ;-)

  16. For that matter by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There may already be Windows drivers, Microsoft may have simply not released them since, lacking final hardware, that isn't a real useful thing to do. However internally there could well be a driver prepped and ready to go.

    1. Re:For that matter by migla · · Score: 1

      Ok, ok.... But the .30 linux kernel supports the nokia RX-51 ("n900"), which windows probably won't, so HA!

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  17. You should be running Linux in 1990s by Ilgaz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    To figure how huge thing this is, you should be running Linux in 1990s and tried to use USB early, practical devices such as mouse.

    Windows 95 with "hacked in" USB support was working better with USB devices. We ended up struggling for hours and ending up with PS/2 adapter coming with USB mouse under Linux. Need to say more?

    1. Re:You should be running Linux in 1990s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      bash.org

      Grover: On my linux box, I once swapped out the motherboard, put in a new video card, doubled the RAM, installed a CD burner, installed a RAID array of (6) 200GB SATA Drives, and overclocked the CPU without ever rebooting it

      Rusty: Didn't you reboot it a few weeks ago?

      Grover: Yeah, I had to reboot to install my Thumb Drive

    2. Re:You should be running Linux in 1990s by gbarules2999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux isn't the operating system it was in the 1990's, just like Windows.

    3. Re:You should be running Linux in 1990s by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, while talking about the 1990s and things Linux had first (compared to Windows):

        - Linux actually existed before Windows 95 (1991 and 1995, respectively - if you want to include NT, that was 1993 IIRC)
        - Thus, features that are shared among early Linux and early Windows (32-bit, long file names, multitasking, ...) were actually first in Linux
        - Multi-user
        - Filesystem with permissions (ok, Windows had "read only" ...)
        - A useful degree of POSIX-compatibility (OTOH, Windows had useful win16-compatibility - I don't think Linux's was very good)
        - Lots of GNU utilities (familiar to those familiar with Unix, and often preferred over their proprietary Unix counterparts)
        - Remote acccess (telnet, X11)
        - Multiple desktop environments to choose from
        - Virtual desktops
        - Development tools either included with the system or available for free (or did Windows have that, too?)
        - Source code either included or available for free
        - Support for multiple machine architectures

      I'm sure the list isn't even exhaustive, but it serves to show that Linux having something before Windows is not exactly rare. Of course, there are tons of things that Windows has gotten before Linux ... widespread consumer acceptance being one obvious and important item.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  18. Re:She's a looker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, going from the photo on her web site, she is hot-looking. I'd totally hit that.

    But how can she be both hot and a geek? Aren't those supposed to be mutually-exclusive, at least on slashdot?

  19. Re:She's a looker by Zencyde · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh, that just means she's a lesbian. Some strange stuff happens on the outer edges of the bell curve. Ever wonder why all of the smartest people have also been crazy, too?

    --
    What day is it? Could you please tell me?
  20. Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As you mention MS, something comes to my mind... There is nothing stopping MS from _never_ releasing drivers and such "Linux gets support first" gestures could either be a kick to them or could guarantee USB3 becoming a failure just because MS didn't include drivers.

    While Apple is certainly more nice company than MS, Apple is the one who always loves "We had it here first" type of things and all (excluding hopeless fanatics) must thank Apple for helping USB to really take off, with first iMac.

    So, they are taking the chance to make SJobs telling how amazingly fast, unbeliavable thing USB 3 is. If I was a company working on USB3 like, multimedia focused technology, I wouldn't make Apple mad too.

    Especially while there is certainly incoming FW3200 technology, significantly more modern than USB (thanks to its roots) and it half belongs to Apple. They can say "We are waiving our patent price for implementing it and here are its specs including comically low CPU usage". Firewire 1600/3200 is _really_ 1600 and 3200 mbit, no overhead etc. issues and you can CHAIN them without losing bandwidth. Think about netbooks having to have 3-4 USB inputs in such small space. A single FW1600 can handle all with amazing speed. What stops firewire? Of course, the high price of implementation. Apple can actually erase half or more of the price instantly with a single memo.

    There are some great technologies failed just because they weren't supported on Windows natively. Just look how that FAT16/32 dinosaur lives on while there are dozens of better filesystems out there.

    1. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is nothing stopping MS from _never_ releasing drivers and such "Linux gets support first" gestures could either be a kick to them or could guarantee USB3 becoming a failure just because MS didn't include drivers.

      Not really. You're wrong because:

      1. USB3 drivers can be bundled with the controllers.
      2. If you mean a stack for USB3, Bluetooth was implemented on XP by WIDCOMM, I see no reason USB3 couldn't also be implemented by a third party.
      3. If everyone but Microsoft has USB3, they will look like bitches. They will add USB3 support just to have the line item. It will suck, just like their USB2 and Bluetooth support, but it will be there.
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      We had a USB Bluetooth dongle and it took 3 days until I give up trying and plugged a infra receiver on a XP PC. That is the Widcomm you speak about.

      As I never throw away devices, I plugged the same thing to OS X 10.2.7 running on G5, I was amazed to see there is a bluetooth icon appearing instantly. As XP SP2/SP3 has built in bluetooth support, same icon appeared on very same OS when I tried later.

      Bundling things doesn't really work. I still have gigantic driver CD in hand and I dare you to make it work in single step on Windows original XP. ;)

    3. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      As you mention MS, something comes to my mind... There is nothing stopping MS from _never_ releasing drivers
      There is also nothing stopping intel writing them themselves.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and we all know, users really install third party drivers that didn't come with their computer.

      If you speak with a browser vendor like Firefox, Opera, you may get surprised about how a huge part of population doesn't install their better application just because it didn't come with computer.

      Basically, how many people installed "Intel chipset drivers" (a very small download) to their XP which will make their PC perform way better and compatible?

    5. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      and we all know, users really install third party drivers that didn't come with their computer.
      Surely if the motherboard has USB 3 support the drivers would come with the computer (at least if it's from a decent manufacturer).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except the market.

      SSD will want USB3.

      It's moot anyways, Win7 will support it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, we are talking about the drivers for a port which is most likely going to be directly on a motherboard in 99% of use cases. I think OEMs can handle supplying motherboard drivers with the computers they sell.

    8. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We had a USB Bluetooth dongle and it took 3 days until I give up trying and plugged a infra receiver on a XP PC. That is the Widcomm you speak about.

      widcomm mostly sucks and I wrote a howto on switching to the windows xp usb stack once. It involves whacking some inf file, and that's about it. OTOH I have had widcomm work and windows XP actually has a working stack now. And of course, is end of life :P

      As I never throw away devices, I plugged the same thing to OS X 10.2.7 running on G5, I was amazed to see there is a bluetooth icon appearing instantly.

      As I loosely remember the process for de-WIDCOMMing Windows XP, you would have to go remove all references to it in c:\windows\inf\*.*, then hack usb.inf or something like that (I'm using Vista right now actually, with SP2 it seems almost OK but I don't do a lot of surfing on it h0 h0 h0) to include a reference to your USB device. You can get the specific vendor/id/class string from the device manager if you just elect to not install drivers, once you remove the widcomm infection.

      It's not a GREAT example, except that I've had it work before. Sorry.

      Bundling things doesn't really work. I still have gigantic driver CD in hand and I dare you to make it work in single step on Windows original XP. ;)

      How much will you pay me :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Apple is certainly more nice company than MS

      Apple is not really nice at all. In terms of 'nice', I'd put them on equal footing. If you look at the history of it, Apple has sued more of it's customers than MS ever has.

      They've also been sued more than once for false advertising.

    10. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      Firewire 1600/3200 is _really_ 1600 and 3200 mbit, no overhead etc. issues and you can CHAIN them without losing bandwidth. Think about netbooks having to have 3-4 USB inputs in such small space. A single FW1600 can handle all with amazing speed. What stops firewire? Of course, the high price of implementation. Apple can actually erase half or more of the price instantly with a single memo.

      The fact that Windows XP SP2 totally screwed up Firewire support didn't help. Every FW device was slow, but many didn't work at all. To make things worse the fix was a big pain in the ass (matching up a bunch of values from the Device Manager with registry entries and editing them and running some patch program.) I'm surprised that anti MS people don't bring that up more often. It's the best "Windows isn't ready for the Desktop" evidence I've encountered.

      There are some great technologies failed just because they weren't supported on Windows natively. Just look how that FAT16/32 dinosaur lives on while there are dozens of better filesystems out there.

      I'm no expert on filesystems, but the fact that determining the free space on a FAT32 volume takes several seconds does seem a bit questionable. Plug an empty USB thumb drive into your system and watch how long the little LED flashes before it's ready.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    11. Re:Is this really a nice thing for USB3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAT = File Allocation Table. To determine disk space you need to scan through the table and add up the allocated blocks.

  21. The worst part about this naming scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This naming scheme invites shady marketing. You know we're going to see USB3.0 mice. They'll be USB3.0 alright, just implementing the low-speed part of the spec. It doesn't matter in case of mice, but users will not expect USB3.0 external hard disks to just implement "hi-speed", yet we will see this kind of up-labeling again: "USB3.0 Hi-Speed."

    (The Superspeed logo does not have SS in it - that would have been a major marketing faux-pas.)

  22. My God! by xSurioNx · · Score: 2, Funny

    They've Gone Plad!!

  23. You think it's that easy to stay in the closet? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Look you can't hide your sexuality just by avoiding Linux. It's way too obvious for that. It's like thinking nobody will realize you're gay if you just don't go into gay bars, while continuing to wear silk shirts with ruffles and frills with the front open, and having sex with other men in public.

    I don't know why you want to stay in the closest, but believe me it's not working your closet is made of glass. Why not just be proud of who you are, and then you can use any OS you want and visit that nice leather bar you pretend not to look longingly at every time you pass.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  24. Actually happens with USB2 now by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    I was planning a iMac 24" and looking for a secondary display solution since I used 2 monitors even back in Windows 98. So, I checked the "real life solution" USB2 scene (e.g. not toasters) a bit.

    First stuff to use USB3 will certainly be SSD drives and later, "secondary display" or even "main display" (e.g. opengl 2/3 capable) GPU stuff will start shipping.

    So, if USB3 is supported under Linux but the GPU solution, likely from a Taiwan/China company doesn't have driver/GUI app... It will be a really ironic situation. I am not mocking Linux, same thing will likely happen to OS X too. I am somehow sure the actual working USB3 devices will run under Windows first.

    1. Re:Actually happens with USB2 now by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I was planning a iMac 24" and looking for a secondary display solution since I used 2 monitors even back in Windows 98. So, I checked the "real life solution" USB2 scene (e.g. not toasters) a bit.

      Umm, why not just use the Mini DisplayPort output with a DVI adapter for your second monitor? Why screw around with inferior USB solutions that won't perform anywhere near as well?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  25. Even worse than you can imagine by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    83 thousand workers all over the globe including Israel and they can't figure out why companies never use anything matching "SS"? Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.

    We used a stylish logo with "SS" letters once at TV and we had our lesson. If Intel calls their Israel office, they can be surprised.

    Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web? Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2. It will be trouble. That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.

    1. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by tyrione · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously? I was thinking of Super Sport. Should all those classic car collectors crap themselves a pile of guilt because you go straight to Weisswurst or Die every time SS follow one another?

      Only a mental moron thinks 666 means Satan. Even a Rabbi will laugh their ass off on that butchered Qabalistic interpretation.

      Hell they might even mock you and say, ``Stay back you devil's advocate!''

      Grow up. This Satan fallacy for the past 2,000 plus years has got to be the greatest one-trick lie ever spread.

    2. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this. I still have dreams of finally getting my hands on a '67 Nova SS fuel prices be damned.
      I'll even smuggle in Tetra-ethyl lead if I have to.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by hkz · · Score: 1

      I installed the Super Server flavor of the Firebird database some weeks ago at work. Came in a FirebirdSS.tar.gz package and was referred to in the docs as the 'SS' (as opposed to the 'CS', or classic server). I swear, the initial reaction in Holland, where I'm located, is immediately on the Schutsstaffel. When some crazy loon committed suicide some months ago by driving his Suzuki Swift into the crowds at the Queen's Day parade, media were quick to point out that the guy might have been a right radical, given the "SS" of his car. Okay, that's obviously nonsense, but that's the knee-jerk reaction to the abbreviation SS here. (Or to NSB, which is why the Dutch national skating federation (formerly known as... ) changed its name to *Royal* national skating etc (or KNSB) straight after the war :-)

    4. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by wampus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was definitely Satan that was behind 667 MHz. Without a doubt. Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer. One or the other. But probably Satan. Also, I think you are probably the kid in class who ate too much paste.

    5. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      ....This Satan fallacy for the past 2,000 plus years has got to be the greatest one-trick lie ever spread.

      The way I heard it, was that the greatest trick Satan ever pulled was convincing so many people he didn't exist...

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    6. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by brackishboy · · Score: 1

      Interesting you should mention classic cars. Jaguar adopted their name after the war for that exact reason; they were originally called S.S. Cars, named for owner William Lyons' preceding company Swallow Sidecars. Their logo actually resembled (to my mind) the German imperial eagle.

    7. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web? Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2. It will be trouble. That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.

      Speaking of Apple, they priced the Apple 1 at $666. So these companies aren't above finding humor in these things - of course, Apple was not a large corporation in those days. But it's particularly amusing when combined with the "bitten apple" representing knowledge (and the fall of mankind). Then there are other fun and provocative namings like "sosumi" and "BHA".

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.

      Why doesn't the Secret Service do that?

    9. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer.

      They wisely decided against using the FPU to calculate it.

    10. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      I knew of the story, but hadn't seen the logo.

      It does look very similar to Nazi military insignia.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    11. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      667? That's the guy across the street from the beast.

    12. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this. I still have dreams of finally getting my hands on a '67 Nova SS fuel prices be damned. I'll even smuggle in Tetra-ethyl lead if I have to. -nB

      Definitely a cool vehicle.

  26. Re:Could someone post a link? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sarah Sharp, a self-styled 'geekess'

    I don't care what she looks like. If she refers to herself as a "geekess", she's off my list based on annoyability quotient.

    Anyway, you want fun, you gotta go for the Liberal Arts majors. They read "erotica" and learn all that kama sutra stuff.

    Or, do what I did and go for a mathematician. For some reason, female mathematicians are sex machines. The trick is to find one that doesn't look like Leonid Brezhnev with lipstick.

    Here's the secret: hang around the math department and look for the girls with names that sound like they're from the former Soviet Bloc. I don't know why, but over there they breed a certain type of hot chick with strong math aptitude. Probably a result of some sort of early genetic experiment before the fall of the USSR. Anyway, they get over here and go to our best math schools and since back home all the guys are brooding boors who drink too much and don't bathe, it can be as simple as being nice to them (and, of course, bathing regularly). Also, if they're from the former Yugoslavia, it's best not to mention that you thought Clinton was a great president. They still hold a grudge about all the bombing of Belgrade and stuff.

    If you play your cards right, you'll end up with a female that looks like Milla Jovovic and has a brain like Pierre de Fermat. They end up with a nice job in a math department somewhere (or even better, the financial sector) and BAM! you're home relaxed, playing Far Cry 2 and commenting on Slashdot, writing a novel the same way that Brian from Family Guy is "writing a novel" and in twenty minutes she comes home bringing bacon. Of course, be prepared to cook dinner occasionally and perform like a tantric guru. It can be a sweet, if tiring existence.

    Now excuse me, I have something on the stove.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  27. Years ahead and years behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tried to get GNU/Linux to work on my dual-monitor machine -- which is currently running Windows 2000 -- and it doesn't work! Seriously, it JustWorks(tm) in Windows 2000, but doesn't work in GNU/Linux in 2009.

    So, yay for the Linux kernel getting USB3.0 support (despite the fact no-one outside the GNU/Linux geek world will notice), boo for not even support dual monitors, iPods, bluetooth, software RAID, Intel/ATi graphics cards (Ubuntu is regression city at the moment) or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).

    In fact, I'd say that there are far more important things to the GNU/Linux ecosystem than USB3.0 support. That's probably why GNU/Linux is a failure on the desktop though: you can't tell the developers what to work on. People should seriously stop advocating it as being ready for the desktop though (see reasons above), they're not going to earn any friends that way. Even Mark Shuttleworth hesitates to recommend Ubuntu!

    1. Re:Years ahead and years behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "boo for not even support dual monitors"

      Before I got my widescreen, I could get support in 30 seconds once I had my drivers installed, which also only takes 30 seconds.

      "iPods"

      I see dozens of software that floats around a great deal of Linux repos that prove you wrong.

      "bluetooth"

      See my first point. Except I didn't even have to install drivers. Just had to plug in my dongle and HOLY FUCK it worked without me doing anything!

      "software RAID"

      I don't waste my time with RAID, so I won't comment. KVM?

      "Intel/ATi graphics cards"

      Intel is fine, ATI sucks, but that's ATI's fault, not Linux's. You want ATI cards to work well on Linux troll ATI not Linux, or realize that GeForce is better and get one.

      "or a single sound library"

      Applying the idiocy of Ubuntu to everyone now? Try using a distribution that does make the mistake of using that, which is basically all but three of them.

      "In fact, I'd say that there are far more important things to the GNU/Linux ecosystem than USB3.0 support."

      Just because YOUR hardware doesn't work? Most everyone I've talked to about Linux was happy with how ALL their hardware worked out of the box as opposed to Windows, which will frequently have only half to none of your hardware working at all.

    2. Re:Years ahead and years behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. fail.

    3. Re:Years ahead and years behind by LingNoi · · Score: 1, Informative

      or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).

      Oh Mr Coward, how wrong you are. It's a simply matter of adding "padsp" to the beginning of the menu item. So "padsp skype" will make skype work in pulse audio.

      The same can be done with WINE. "padsp winecfg", click on the audio tab and select the OSS driver, then exit. Now when starting your wine app type "padsp wine appname.exe"

  28. CPU usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    devices that make use of USB 3.0 will still not have drivers.

    That's simply not true. The USB 3.0 spec. is mostly concerned with the phy. & bus. The xHCI spec covers the HCD. The software-level device interfaces have not changed, or have changed very little.

    So does that mean CPU usage will be 100% when I copy files to a hard drive?

    Historically this is the main reason why I always went with FireWire for external enclosures--USB killed CPU on heavy duty workloads. (Of course I haven't used external USB in a while, so my information may now be out of date.)

    And I know we generally have CPU cycles to spare, but it just grates on my engineering "sensitivities" and comes off as an inelegant design. Things may have improved over the years, but early problems have made USB a stigma in my mind for anything more than keyboards and mice.

    1. Re:CPU usage? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Informative

      So does that mean CPU usage will be 100% when I copy files to a hard drive?

      USB 3.0 does away with polling (which is what causes the high CPU usage) with an asynchronous event model whereby the device controller sends service requests to the host (unfortunately, I can't find a great reference for this, although they mention it here).

      Or, to put it another way, it allows USB to enter the 20th century. :)

    2. Re:CPU usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, sir, but it's been the 21st century for 9 years now.

      Okay! Okay! I'll get off your lawn!

    3. Re:CPU usage? by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Asynchronous event models are sooooo 60's. USB needs considerably more to make it into the 21st century, so Abcd1234 was entirely correct.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:CPU usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Us non-Americans have a difficult time keeping up with your illogic methods, such as measuring distances using your limbs in a non linear system.

    5. Re:CPU usage? by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Calling it the 20th century just because the numbers start 20 seems obvious, but then what century was covered by the years 0-99? This is a computer geek website, we all understand arrays that start from zero, and hence that the 20th item in the array of centuries will cover years 1900-1999. The 'non-computery' approach would probably start at one and have the first two digits as the number, but that would make the 20th century 2001-2100, which makes even less sense

    6. Re:CPU usage? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it another way, it allows USB to enter the 20th century. :)

      Yeah, I always hated how the USB support was broken for my Babbage Engine! It worked so much better on my Z3.

    7. Re:CPU usage? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Jebus, at least *someone* got the (admittedly lame) joke... :)

  29. Re:Could someone post a link? by Qubit · · Score: 1, Funny

    I could engage in some huge diatribe about how you're objectifying women and you shouldn't be a douche online 'cause that makes the geek girls uncomfortable.

    But I'm not even going to need that line. I'm just going to point out what she says on her blog:

    Vim automatic spell checking is my crutch

    Vim. Vim!. As in "Mmmmmmm, I love vi."

    Arrrrggggghhhhh!!!! So sad. Another soul lost...

    Okay, all together now: "I wish they all could be Emacs girls..."

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  30. Re:She's a looker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > she's a lesbian.

    You say that like it's a bad thing. I say, more power to 'em - so long as we can watch...

  31. Re:Could someone post a link? by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, if they're from the former Yugoslavia, it's best not to mention that you thought Clinton was a great president. They still hold a grudge about all the bombing of Belgrade and stuff.

    That's only if she's a Serb. If she's Croatian, it could be a point in your favour.

    The takeaway here is that paying attention to geopolitics can pay great dividends.

  32. Ask anyone on street what 666 stands for by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Oh I bet the moron at Intel thought exactly like you. Guess what? You don't design the names/logos based on 1-2% of population. You base them on 98% which includes every kind of uneducated, fanatic freak out there.

    USB3 "super speed" lame name will transform to "SS" and people will really be bugged about it. Look past browser window displaying slashdot, there is a World out there and they have no clue about the real root of number 666.

    1. Re:Ask anyone on street what 666 stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      guess what, you're tender hypersensitivity is not representative of this so-called "real world" not everybody is barking up the antisemitism tree all day long. there are plenty of casses where the letters SS exist which have nothing to do with the Nazi era or racism or anything of the sort. as mentioned SS stands for Super Sport among car enthusiasts, old people generally know SS as Social Security in the US, if you're of a naval background SS stands for Sailing Ship or Steam Ship, and a quick google search reveals taht a number of companies and organizations are abbreviated SS.

      Stop Screaming
      you
      Silly Sod

  33. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    She's even hotter in this pic:

    http://www.woolfsimmonds.co.uk/sarah-sharp.html

  34. completely irrelevant unless people write drivers by petes_PoV · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    It doesn't matter who's first (just think: which company produced the first commercial TV set, or SLR camera - much good did it do them today). What does matter is who has the best support.

    Given that Linux can't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, since none of the hardware manufacturers think it's worth spending the time and money to write drivers, provide a support channel and publicise the fact, just slapping a USB 3 stack into the kernel means nothing.

    Let's see how many peripheral manufacturers bring out linux drivers for their kit, before they bring out Windows X drivers. That's the only thing that would make a difference.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  35. no wait, it is 5000 mbit! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Firewire guys (including Apple) stop telling the true bandwidth of Firewire 1600/3200 and adopt AMD naming scheme?

    If USB3 claims 5 gigabit and yet performs same as firewire 3200, Firewire (IEEE1394) should use Firewire 5000 and wait for Intel to say a WORD about it.

    Enough with this fake bandwidth scheme by CPU monopoly company really.

  36. Re:Could someone post a link? by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You mean there best math students are sent here and they have an apitidude more maths?
    Wow, who would have thought~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! I am amazed at how revealing that picture is! She certainly not trying to keep her looks a secret.

  38. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...she's off my list...

    I'm sure Sarah will be devastated when she is informed.

  39. Re:Could someone post a link? by jesperhh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know why, but over there they breed a certain type of hot chick with strong math aptitude. Probably a result of some sort of early genetic experiment before the fall of the USSR.

    Clearly the Bene Gesserit of the USSR

  40. Obligatory... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    The Usual Suspects quote:

    "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."

  41. Anybody remember that USB 3 was demoed on Linux? by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 0

    There was an article almost half a year ago about a demonstration of USB 3.0 throughput on Linux?

  42. Isn't this useless without USB 3.0 hardware? by brentonboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't seen any USB 3.0 devices for sale yet. I suspect that they won't appear until sometime after Windows and Mac support USB 3. So, as cool as this is, there is no need to rush off and implement it on your own now. You can wait until your next kernel update.

    1. Re:Isn't this useless without USB 3.0 hardware? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      You don't see any USB3 devices for sale, because USB3 isn't standardized yet. Putting this in the kernel is what is otherwise known as "jumping the gun".

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  43. It's Not The First... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0

    It's not the first until it actually implements it. Until then, any other system could still get there first.

    Of course with no USB 3.0 ports or hardware, it hardly matters.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:It's Not The First... by Vanders · · Score: 1

      It's not the first until it actually implements it.

      Er, Linux does implement it. It's about to merged into mainline.

      Of course with no USB 3.0 ports or hardware, it hardly matters.

      Sarah Sharpe works for Intel. She's access to prototype HCDs and host devices for over six months and now has access to engineering sample chipsets that implement USB 3.0. The code has already been shown to work.

    2. Re:It's Not The First... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      whay:
      http://www.isorm.com/product_info.php?products_id=3336

      Windows 7 will support USB 3.0

      http://www.vista123.net/content/microsoft-talkes-about-windows-7-and-usb-30

      Of course its MS, so USB 3.0 probably won't be fully implement until SP3

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:It's Not The First... by sl149q · · Score: 1

      MCCI announced a Windows driver for 3.0 last Feb... http://www.embedded-computing.com/news/Industry+News/15701 So I would suggest that pre-dates Linux availability a fair bit.

  44. Re:completely irrelevant unless people write drive by brentonboy · · Score: 1

    That is interesting. USB 3 could be a chance to start over and start writing drivers for every single USB 3 device as it comes out. It would need some organization, a single location for anyone to submit devices, and lots of work, but it could totally happen.

  45. Re:Could someone post a link? by Sam36 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dude vim has spell checking!? That is awesome!

  46. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what she looks like. If she refers to herself as a "geekess", she's off my list based on annoyability quotient.

    Anyway, you want fun, you gotta go for the Liberal Arts majors. They read "erotica" and learn all that kama sutra stuff.

    Or, do what I did and go for a mathematician. For some reason, female mathematicians are sex machines. The trick is to find one that doesn't look like Leonid Brezhnev with lipstick.

    Too bad you only learned the trick after bedding a few...

    (A geek gloating about his conquests on /. --yeah, like we believe you).

  47. Re:completely irrelevant unless people write drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux can't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices

    I fuckin' love Armchair Idiots. You're so clueless it's almost cute!

  48. Linux is full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is the first to support one of the most geekness things like USB 3.0, but things that real people needs like Blu-ray support Linux is the last.

    1. Re:Linux is full of fail by petrus4 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Interesting.

      Apparently the WoW forum losers are starting to show up on Slashdot. Calling something "full of fail," is a classic WoWism.

      Please find somewhere else to interact with your fellow illiterate, pre-pubescent sociopaths. Slashdot has, despite certainly not being perfect, customarily been vastly more elevated and intelligent than the cesspool that is the WoW forums. I for one would like to keep it that way.

    2. Re:Linux is full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone that has experienced the cesspool that is the wow forums as well as others like conan, eve etc I find it hard to believe you find Slashdot to be above them. Slashdot suffers just as badly from the same moronic posts an ill informed individuals that think there poorly thought out opinions are facts, if anything slashdot is worse as it is supposed to be a more informed community. The amount of posts on slashdot that make me want to cringe and bitch slap people is astonishing whether they are from the MS Fan boi's or perhaps even worse the linux fan boi's who don't know shit about IT but think they do cause they have ubuntu installed on a second partition.

    3. Re:Linux is full of fail by taucross · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot suffers just as badly from the same moronic posts an ill informed individuals that think there poorly thought out opinions are facts,

      Yes, apparently it does.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    4. Re:Linux is full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot, now with added pomposity!

  49. Re:completely irrelevant unless people write drive by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It does matter whose firt. At least to some of uis. Does that mean that person will reap the monitory rewards? no.

    "vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, "
    such as...?

    Of course had you read it, you would know she implemented for a hardware reason.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. Re:Could someone post a link? by narooze · · Score: 2, Funny

    Leonid Brezhnev with lipstick.

    Well, still no lipstick, but a start anyway... http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SPpWp0E7Th8/SGJjHYjA_oI/AAAAAAAAAVI/e0wWURoKzHY/s400/brezhnev.jpg

  51. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You guys are fucking creepy.

  52. Re:Could someone post a link? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could engage in some huge diatribe about how you're objectifying women

    Yes, but talk like that will just make you popular with the lesbians.

    Which is perfectly alright. But if you're straight it's a lonely existence.

  53. Fail and you by symbolset · · Score: 1

    There's the whole rest of the Internet, if this blog doesn't suit you.

    But posting comments about how much you dislike a blog, on that blog? That's above mid range on the fail-meter right there.

    Did IE hide your address bar, and now you can't get out? Here, let me help.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Fail and you by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      There's the whole rest of the Internet, if this blog doesn't suit you.

      a) This site isn't a blog. This site existed quite a long time before blogs, and if you weren't one of the very 14 year olds I was talking about yourself, you might know that.

      b) Grammatical abuse, such as misuse of the word, "fail," doesn't make the people who do it look intelligent, mature, or cool. It makes them appear exactly what they are; jaded, emo adolescents with anger management issues, who if they got out of Mummy and Daddy's basement and went into the real world for a few minutes, might discover that while there actually are valid things to feel pain in response to, contrary to what they think, they've never actually experienced any of them.

  54. I remember... by hotfireball · · Score: 1

    Opera was also first browser that implements Acid 3. Apparently, Apple Safari 4 is the only browser in production right now available in the market.

  55. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Sarah, don't get testy...

  56. Great, too bad no one uses LINUX. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0

    Point stands. This is news that mostly no one cares about. I'm sorry but its true.

    A better headline would be "Microsoft figures out how to write a great OS"... That would be far more useful to MOST people, than USB 3.0 in linux.

    1. Re:Great, too bad no one uses LINUX. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Point stands. This is news that mostly no one cares about. I'm sorry but its true.

      A better headline would be "Microsoft figures out how to write a great OS"... That would be far more useful to MOST people, than USB 3.0 in linux.

      If Microsoft figured out how to write a great OS, that would definitely be worth a headline. But I'm not figuring on seeing it anytime soon.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  57. I wonder when... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder when Microsoft will catch up, so that Windows will be, you know, "ready for the desktop"?

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  58. Re:Could someone post a link? by Perf · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason, female mathematicians are sex machines.

    They end up with a nice job in a math department somewhere (or even better, the financial sector) and BAM! you're home relaxed, playing Far Cry 2 and commenting on Slashdot, writing a novel the same way that Brian from Family Guy is "writing a novel" and in twenty minutes she comes home bringing bacon. Of course, be prepared to cook dinner occasionally and perform like a tantric guru. It can be a sweet, if tiring existence.

    Now excuse me, I have something on the stove.

    It's all fun and games until your math bunny starts multiplying. Then you're stuck at home with dirty diapers. ;-)

  59. Re:Could someone post a link? by Qubit · · Score: 1

    Yes, but talk like that will just make you popular with the lesbians.

    Which is perfectly alright. But if you're straight it's a lonely existence.

    I dunno... I mean, sure, lesbians often have friends that are gay as well. But in my experience they tend to have female friends that are straight or bi, so I find that it generally works out okay.

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  60. Re:Could someone post a link? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    I don't care what she looks like.

    She is actually quite cute. I saw a photo of her in an article that she submitted to Linux Journal a few months ago. She discussed how to use USB and Linux to monitor a model rocket.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  61. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What about the bi overlap? And people often aren't as segregated as made out to be in these areas.

  62. Re:Could someone post a link? by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I don't think this is a troll, i mean, i thought it too. I have modpoints, but... well.... it's not troll.... it's not insightful.... not funny, over, or underrated, not particularly interesting, not necessarily flamebait, not redundant, certainly not informative, being a question.... but not *quite* offtopic either... sigh....

    can I get a "-1 lame" mod?

    --
    ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
  63. Re:Could someone post a link? by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

    Informative?!? Really?!?

    --
    ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
  64. Re:Could someone post a link? by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Looks good to me:"

    Bah, pictures mean nothing. Check out her youtube video

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  65. Microsoft doesn't support USB by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Microsoft never really supported the older USB standards. OK, HID and Mass Storage Devices work, but there are whole other classes of standard devices like networking cards or USB->Serial converters which just don't work under Windows.

    At work we have once tried it out. We bought 3 random devices, an USB->Serial converter (standard class for that), an USB->Ethernet converter (also a standard class) and an USB->WLAN adaptor. Even though the last one didn't confirm to any standards, all three worked immediately by plugging them into a Linux box. Trying the same on a Windows box resulted in cryptic error messages about "drivers". Windows still has a _long_ way to go to be ready for the desktop.

    USB survived without support from Microsoft so far. If Microsoft would have supported USB from the start, the users experience would have been _way_ better. You'd have real plug and play.

  66. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teste.

  67. Hey kiddies! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would you kids please get your wanking done before you start posting on Slashdot? Panting and drooling every time you see a female is pretty boring for others...

  68. Re:Could someone post a link? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be new here.

  69. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a liberal arts type (well, I have a B.A. in lit., but I chalk that up to youthful stupidity and a lack of useful role models), but I only dated math and science girls, for the reasons you state. Smarter than me and insatiable. Rowr!

  70. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uhmm, there's more then one person with that name...
    http://sarah.thesharps.us/

  71. Re:Could someone post a link? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Anyway, you want fun, you gotta go for the Liberal Arts majors. They read "erotica" and learn all that kama sutra stuff.

    I must disagree. I prefer Christian girls. Though I'm not a Christian myself, those non-religious types all have some kind of hangup. I don't mean one of those girls who fucked half of the planet and decided to get religion when she tired of being a filthy whore. I mean a girl who was raised in a religious household. You find yourself a girl who suppressed her sexuality for all of her teenage years and she'll be ready to explode by the time she's 25. I speak the truth in this, trust me.

    Also, if they're from the former Yugoslavia, it's best not to mention that you thought Clinton was a great president.

    Why would I do that? My parents were married; to each other.

    LK
    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  72. Re:Could someone post a link? by kaizokuace · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    oh thats a good Dune ref. Haven't seen one for a while on /. thanx guy.

    --
    Balderdash!
  73. Most welcome by dugeen · · Score: 1

    This is excellent news, I only hope that soon Linux will be able to recognise a USB device that was connected after the system booted.

    1. Re:Most welcome by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

      Linux generally has for years ....
      XWindows (the graphic layer) didn't until relatively recently. (that covers things like mice, tablets & keyboards) last time I looked tablet hotplugging was less than perfect but plugging keyboards and mice work seemlessly for me.

      Storage Devices and Cameras have been hotplugable for years
      UsbMidi Interfaces and Soundcards are hotpluggable and have been for some time.
      Joysticks are hotpluggable.
      Printers and Scanners to the best of my recollection will also hotplug.

      What does that leave?

    2. Re:Most welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck off.

    3. Re:Most welcome by Bio)-(azard · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I get this all right. So, I can go get some kernel, or compile my own, to get beta usb 3.0 support for hardware I can't get right now? Don't get me wrong, I think its cool to see liunx on top of things, but I just don't see this as being a 'linux beats windows' score. Simple fact is, there won't be anything to buy on the shelf unless windows supports it. I can't recall the last time I saw a memory stick with a 'linux ready' sticker on it. Cool, yes, but I wouldn't cheer. Its something that I would expect my operating system to do.

  74. From a Windows user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this new driver corrupts all your porn hard drives...

    I do not use linux, since linux means communism and can be used by terrists.

    Windows Rules, Bill Gates Rocks ! :-PPPP

    P.S.: Ooooh, I'm sooo envious of you, Linux users !

  75. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool story bro

  76. Comments on her "Who Am I?" page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the comments in her Who Am I? page.

    http://sarah.thesharps.us/2002-06-06-00-00.cherry

    I suddenly feel i know why theres no girls on the internet.

  77. No big news to me? by HigH5 · · Score: 1

    Someone has to be first and it's no wonder to me that Linux can reach this goals first since the development models allows that very well. On the other hand, it seems to me just another moot point to show how superduper OS Linux is. Of course it is great! But yelling "I got here first" won't help you much if the turtle is what most people want...

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse delendam.
  78. Re:Could someone post a link? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Funny

    You guys are fucking creepy.

    No, but they wish they were.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  79. 20th Century indeed. by Chaset · · Score: 1

    Indeed. This is the way things are done in the consumer PC industry. Come up with a crappy standard that doesn't quite do what you want, but is dirt cheap to implement, so that it will get adopted en masse. Then, slowly, over time, kludge in features on top of it so that customers will have to buy into each new version to get what they want, and in the end, finally get something that performs somewhat adequately and is basically equivalent to what was always available in a different standard, but is a lot kludgier underneath. Happened with IDE vs. SCSI, x86 vs. RISC machines, and happening again with USB vs. Firewire. It seems so inefficient to me... .../me grimaces in annoyance because it's darn near impossible to find a firewire video camera these days.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  80. Cute, but engaged, obviously. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Come on, haven't you figured out the way this works yet?

    • Physically attractive
    • Intelligent
    • Sane
    • Single

    Pick any three.

    --

    +++ATH0
  81. Re:Could someone post a link? by poolmeister · · Score: 1
    --
    CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
  82. Re:Could someone post a link? by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    Vim automatic spell checking is my crutch

    Crotch? Eww.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  83. Re:Could someone post a link? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Ah. I see. Even the moderators are infected, and think it is normal, and somehow OK, to be religious, and that one even has to protect it.
    Well. Even that is typical schizophrenic behavior. You can read about it, even on Wikipedia.
    I should have expected it.

    Well, I wish you to get well soon!
    (Or suffer the drawbacks from living in a twisted, false reality, where others suck you dry, and you love them for it.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  84. My eyes! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    After goatse.cx and tubgirl I would think to learn my lesson clicking links here ... just can't help it.

  85. Afraid to click by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    8 out of 10 times its something that just can't leave your mind after blinding you when posted on slashdot.

  86. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is wrong with you?

  87. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if masturbation doesn't count.

  88. Re:Could someone post a link? by superdana · · Score: 1

    Christ. You fuckers make me want to change my name to George.

  89. Re:Could someone post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what you look like; you're off my list because you're a douche and based on my annoyability quotient which is very low for docheness.

  90. Re:Could someone post a link? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    The problem that I have with your position is that it takes just as much faith to be an athiest as it takes to be religious.
    I'll give you the short version. Do we (humanity) know all that there is to know about the universe? Of course not. So, since we don't know everything we can't know if there is a supreme being. At best, all we can really be is agnostic. Because we really don't know.

    Religious people don't have a monopoly on believing strange crap.

    If you're secure enough in your beliefs, you won't be converted just by spending time with someone who has different beliefs.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  91. Re:Could someone post a link? by theblondebrunette · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell that to Reiser :) He had a Russian chick and look what happened :)

  92. Re:Could someone post a link? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Religious people don't have a monopoly on believing strange crap.

    True, but they have raised it to an art form.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  93. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes! linux will be the first to support usb 3.0. It will remain sorta beta till usb 4.0 is released.
    only 1% of the hardware will be supported.... that will increase to wooping 20% by the time 4.0 is released.

  94. Re:Could someone post a link? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    True, but they have raised it to an art form.

    It takes just as much faith to be anti-religious as it does to be religious.

    Religious people believe that some mysterious force or being created the universe and all life in it.
    Anti-Religious people believe that the universe and all life came about as a matter of random chance.

    We have no way to prove or disprove either position. To be an subscribe to either position requires faith.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  95. Re:Could someone post a link? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Wow, someone needs her humour detector to be fixed. You foed me over this?!? There are a lot of reasons to foe me, but making a joke like this isn't a good reason.

    George Eliot lived in a society whom women were simply not taken seriously. She circumvented that by posing as a man.

    This here is something completely different. She's a geek and a pretty good one too: she'll get her code accepted in the Linux kernel and works for Intel. It's hard to beat that.... So respect there is.

    However, geek girls are so rare that we surely want to know how attractive she is (and she is!). Note the word attractive: it comes from "to attract", meaning we're evaluating her "potential mate" status. We're all still cavemen (and cavewomen... you do know that women check out men all the time, don't you?) in that regard. "potential mate" implies sex. USB comes in male and female variant. She is attractive. Add those three together and you get a comment like the one I made. It is just meant funny and on top of that I added a winkie-smile, indicating that one should just take it as a joke.

    It is just a mere comment which was mostly meant to entertain. I'm married, but not as lucky to be married to a geek girl (she's pretty much the exact opposite and that causes some problems).

    This is nothing more than the geek equivalent of a construction worker whistling after a pretty girl. Or someone saying that they wouldn't kick $ACTOR/$ACTRESS out of their bed.

    So lighten up a bit.... You're a woman in a male-dominated world, but we don't persecute you. When I attended Computer Science, we had five girls in the whole course (100 people at the beginning). All of them were treated with respect and they could manage the occasional sexual innuendo. They knew it was for fun, so why can't you?

    Keep me foed, I don't care... However, you seriously need to reevaluate your sensitivities as a female in the male-dominated-geek world.

  96. Re:Could someone post a link? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Even the moderators are infected, and think it is normal, and somehow OK, to be religious,

    Being that all people are to some degree religious, it is certainly "normal" to be religious.

    Even people who think they're athiests are religious. It takes a greater amount of faith to believe that all of the universe is the result of random chance than to believe that some immensely powerful being created it.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano