Slashdot Mirror


A Supervolcano Beneath Mt. St. Helens?

We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (not going to blow, 2004; going to blow, 2008). Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt. St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano. The jury is still out on this one. Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report. "Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface. The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena. The currents are stronger when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock. ... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano. About 15 km below the surface, the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material. This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east. It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor. ... [Some researchers] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture. Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock."

180 comments

  1. Mount Helen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, most slashdotters would mount anyone with that name.

    1. Re:Mount Helen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chances are that they'll forget to use sudo the first time...

    2. Re:Mount Helen? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Mount a saint?

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    3. Re:Mount Helen? by shwa · · Score: 1

      i don't know anyone desperate enough to tap that ash.

      --
      Carpet pissers did this? Well Dude, we just don't know.
  2. Lava life? by awarrenfells · · Score: 1

    Yay, they found more Lava.

    ... umm. Now what?

    1. Re:Lava life? by BPPG · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to be a nit-picker, but lava and magma aren't actually the same thing; lava is magma flowing on the Earth's surface. The properties of the two are the same, aside from lava being surrounded by relatively cool air, and magma being surrounded by insulating earth.

      I know that doesn't really answer your question, but consider this; It's not lava yet.

      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
    2. Re:Lava life? by awarrenfells · · Score: 2

      Indeed, sir! Indeed.

      I know jack all about geology and vulcanology. Thanks for the info though. ^_^

    3. Re:Lava life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I know enough to say the Spock isn't lava either....

    4. Re:Lava life? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      It's not lava yet.

      No, of course it isn't. It only turns into lava when you put it in a lamp. Either that, or soap. I'm not sure which.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Lava life? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Zounds! It's full of ions!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  3. Gov. Jindal isn't worried by PotatoFiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach. Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the largest government spending bill in history, with a price tag of more than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes ... $140 million for something called "volcano monitoring." Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.

    -- Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal

    --
    "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
    1. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. And next time Louisiana gets slammed by a big storm (and it will) Jindal or his successor will go running to the Federal government for help, all the while whining that not enough was done to predict or prepare for the event. But volcanoes? Pffft. Everyone who has to worry about that is a damnyankee anyway.

      (Of course, if it weren't for those damnyankees, Jindal himself would never have had a prayer of getting elected county dogcatcher in any ex-Confederate state, much less governor ... but we're not supposed to mention that either.)

      Louisiana politics have always been deeply corrupt, but they used to be relatively sane. I'm not sure what happened.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast. Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.

      It is a fact that Jindal, governor of a state (Louisiana) which has suffered mightily from natural disasters (hurricanes) in the recent past and will inevitably do so in the future, criticized Federal spending on a program designed to predict and prepare for natural disasters (volcanoes) which could easily be as devastating if not more so. It is also a fact that Jindal made this a partisan issue. Pointing this out does not constitute a troll.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuck Louisiana. They passed the Science Education Act which mandates that creationism, er..."intelligent" design, must be taught alongside evolution.

      Fuck the south, and FUCK RELIGION. Hmmph. Talking to a fucking invisible man in the sky. Pure and utter stupidity.

    4. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up. not a troll.

    5. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Well, he's right to some extent. Funding for ongoing projects (like volcano monitoring) should be in the normal budget - the stimulus bill was supposed to be for one-time expenses and to kick start the economy, not for pork or to circumvent the normal budget process. I can't help but wonder how much 'seed' money for ongoing projects/pork is hidden in the stimulus money.
       
      Disclaimer: Puget Sound area resident, and one aware of the difference between volcano monitoring and basic research.

    6. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do you consider facts to be "right-wing"? You must then consider left-wingers to live in a fantasy world?

      (My own personal opinion is that this is true, but I am not a right-winger myself.)

      Leave the politics out of it, and let's just consider MONEY. If those bastards want to live in a hurricane zone, below sea level, fine. Let them. But not on my nickel.

    7. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by QuoteMstr · · Score: 0

      Ah, I see I got hit by the right-wing mod-bombers too.

      What's up with those lately? They're all over the place with their brave and honest "-1 Overrated" judgments.

    8. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Either you completely misread my post, or you're deliberately twisting my words. Given your posting history, the first seems more likely. The facts in this case completely support the "liberal," "left-wing" position, in either case ... which is usually the way to bet.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What happened was that I did not realize that both posts were from you. So yes, I misinterpreted what was being said.

    10. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      If well looks very shortsighted, there is another thing we should think around this. If a deployed volcano monitoring system confirms that it will blow in short time, what could be done? Defusing? Will the probably short time before it happens give any advantage in the preparations for it over starting after or starting now, making us more prepared in general for any mid-sized disaster? Of course, could make a difference to people living in a somewhat short range of the explosion.

      In the other hand... a supervolcano could not happen in his lifetime, but another election surely will.

    11. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      A fair number of them, I think, have realized that they can't possibly win in an actual debate, so when they get mod points they scan through stories looking for something that presses their political hot buttons.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    12. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Leave the politics out of it, and let's just consider MONEY. If those bastards want to live in a hurricane zone, below sea level, fine. Let them. But not on my nickel.

      It's interesting that libertarians and other assorted nutjobs always point out that no one has to live in hurricane zone or below sea level, yet fail to realize that they themselves don't have to live in a civilized, cooperative society. They can move to Somalia or some other governmentless hellhole and be free of taxes and all that they imply.

      But of course following his own advice would inconvenience the nutjob himself, rather than some unknown people.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by jabithew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why do you consider facts to be "right-wing"? You must then consider left-wingers to live in a fantasy world?

      Interesting you mention this. I'm just reading Alan Sokal's Beyond the Hoax, where he criticises the liberal-left academic post-modernists for trying to undermine facts. Of course, he then goes on to criticise the fundamentalist right for the same thing, and notes the irony that the latter wouldn't have been able to succeed without the groundwork of the former.

      So there was a period (pre-Bush, essentially) where the literary academic establishment did consider facts to be a right-wing anti-progressive and revisionist construct, or some other such spew of verbal diarrhea. Guess what goes around comes around after all.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    14. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the next time an earthquake strikes California, I don't want MY tax dollars paying for it. It's what the morons get for living along a fault line.

      And the next time an F5 tornado wipes out an entire town in Kansas... the gub'ment better leave MY money alone. They had it comin'!

      And the next time a strong rain storm floods the entire Missouri Valley... not on MY dime, brother!

      And when a cat-IV hurricane turns up the Atlantic Coast and obliterates Washington, DC, they're on their own! What idiot lives near an ocean, anyway?

      I'm only payin' for people DIDN'T deserve to have their homes destroyed.

    15. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by blincoln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If those bastards want to live in a hurricane zone, below sea level, fine. Let them. But not on my nickel.

      How would you feel about dealing with the massive economic hit to the country involved in all of the people living in similar areas relocating? Whether the government funded it or not, you'd be talking about bringing huge pieces of industry to a standstill for years.
      Oh, and don't forget about the ruin you'd wreak on the country by shutting down all of the ports on two of the three coasts. Nearly anywhere that is capable of being a useful port is also going to be victim to natural disasters of some kind - whether it's hurricanes in the South or earthquakes in the West. But, you know, while you're relocating all those millions of people, maybe you can have them dig a container-ship-sized canal to Idaho. Not many options for that in the South, since (AFAIK) most of the states between the South and e.g. Michigan (which already has water access) are hit by tornadoes.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    16. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just love the straw-man argument. More! The more I hear the more I will know how to defend against.

      Just out of curiosity, though, why do you consider Libertarians to be "nutjobs"? You have a problem with free markets, or the Constitution? After all, those are the two big things Libertarians stand for.

      And... how would "following his own advice" be inconvenient. Assuming I were a libertarian, the fact is that I live neither in a hurricane zone, OR below sea level. Nor in a coastal area subject to typhoons or tsunamis. Nor in an area that is prone to earthquakes, or lava flows. Hmmm... seems that I am following my own advice...

    17. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, fuck yes. I'd rather deal with relocating people then the eternal cost of supporting them with welfare. What makes you think that Katrina was an anomoly, or that physics won't win in the end. You're a fucking retard.

    18. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      If I throw a mod-bomb straight up, then do I get mod-up or mod-down?

    19. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Troll

      Relocation? That's called "TFB".

      Look, let me make my position clear: living below flood level is STUPID. Period. I don't want to pay for their levees, or relocation, or rebuilding, or any of it, any more than I would want to pay for somebody who burned their house down by using a turkey fryer indoors. Stupid is stupid.

      Personally, I would just consider it evolution in action. The average intelligence of the human race goes up a fraction.

      And before you accuse me of being a hypocrite, let me repeat what I wrote elsewhere in this thread: I don't live in a floodzone, or a hurricane zone, or an area that is subject to typhoons, or tsunamis, or dust storms, or earthquakes, or...

      If you live in a hurricane zone AND below flood level (on the COAST yet...), then if your property gets flooded, you are not a "victim of a natural disaster" at all. You are a victim of your own stupidity. I'll keep my money and offer no sympathy.

    20. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I misunderstood the poster's intent... but it is an interesting topic.

      Without claiming that either side is correct politically, I will say that it is my experience that those on the Left, relatively speaking, tend to be more concerned with idealism than with verifiable facts. Which is a very dangerous thing to let loose on the American people.

      On the other hand, idealism or no, the Right has done considerable damage to the American people and their society over the last 8 or 10 years itself. So... it has just been one variety of bad after another.

    21. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Troll

      And just let me add this: Louisiana (and New Orleans in particular) politicians took Federal (read: your and my) money, that was supposed to be used to shore up the levees and so on, and spent it instead on their own favorite local pork projects. So, while I don't have ANY sympathy for the flood victims, I would go further and say that those politicians ought to be in prison, if not shot outright.

    22. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      2 questions, then:

      1) What is a bill funding volcano monitoring doing in a "stimulus" package?

      2) While the need to monitor volcanoes is important, do we need to spend the money right now?

      The volcano monitoring funding wasn't put included in the bill for some high scientific purpose - it was pork. It may be worthwhile, and even necessary, but don't kid yourself: if the sponsor had another place to spend the money for more political gain, volcano monitoring wouldn't be on the radar.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    23. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Fine but the city was basically destroyed. When it was built it made sense powered freight transportation and fishing were both important so it was logical to construct cities on the coast. Its not reasonable to pick up and move a perfectly good city but when its devastated to the degree New Orleans was why should we rebuild it? Why not move the entire thing 50 miles inland? A short (cheap to replace) stretch of rail road could connect the docs to the city and other ground transport. Moving freight by rail is very cheap, so no problems there. The fishermen would have a little longer commute again they could use the rail in and out at night, as well as to haul their catch back.

      If public money is going to be used for disaster relief ( and I agree that it should be in most cases ) then their should at least be some plan to avoid or mitigate the potential loss from future disasters. So I agree with the parent. Its ok if you want to live below sea level in a hurricane zone but if you want but if you expect to use my nickel to rebuild your city after its destroyed then I get to at least insist you put it some place more sensible given the modern world.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    24. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      libertarians always go on about how a place with no government would be paradise. Well there is such a place: Somalia. Why don't you move there to establish the libertarian paradise. That neither you
      nor the other libertarians don't shows that libertarians are just wannabe freeriders.

    25. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. We can't win a debate.

      This is how most debates go that I have experienced.

      Left winger: States a position.
      Right winger: States a differing opinion.
      Left winger: Presents some "facts" that typically have no basis in reality.
      Right winger: Presents some facts that make the left winger visibly upset.
      Left winger: Accuses the right winger of making it up, or quoting "Right wing conspiracy talking points".
      Right winger: Provides sources and tells the left winger where they can look it up for themselves.
      Left winger: Calls right winger a racist, hate monger, bigot, homophobe and storms off thinking they just won the debate.

      Yep your right, hard to win a debate when facing total idiocy like that.

      When you have "intellectuals" like Jenean Garafalo, Rosie O'Donal, and Kieth Olberman as your role models when it comes to debating we have no chance in any real discussion, and you guys get on us about the ineptitude of Rush Limbaugh? Just astounding.

    26. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called Keynesian economics. When the economy is in a slump, you should employ people doing whatever work that you can think of. Especially random, somewhat questionable research. Most of the major breakthroughs have been the result of random, somewhat questionable research.

      Furthermore, people need to quit whining about 'pork' in the stimulus bill. A stimulus bill is by definition pork. If there wasn't pork in it, it wouldn't be a stimulus bill. It would be an energy spending initiative, or a bank bailout, or something like that. If you are against pork, you are categorically against stimulus bills. That's fine, but just say that any stimulus is a bad idea, don't nitpick out the parts you think aren't worthwhile.

    27. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 questions, then:

      1) What is a bill funding volcano monitoring doing in a "stimulus" package?

      2) While the need to monitor volcanoes is important, do we need to spend the money right now?

      The volcano monitoring funding wasn't put included in the bill for some high scientific purpose - it was pork. It may be worthwhile, and even necessary, but don't kid yourself: if the sponsor had another place to spend the money for more political gain, volcano monitoring wouldn't be on the radar.

      Do you already know when all the volcanoes near residential areas are going to erupt?
      If so, then you make a great point, none of this money is needed. Get your ass to Washington son!

      P.S. I didn't know the volcano lobby was such a powerful force.

    28. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Left winger: States a position.
      Right winger: States a differing opinion.
      Left winger: repeats some unverifiable "facts" he read in some pamphlet.
      Right winger: criticize the methodology of the facts. states that they are well known as urban legends even though he didn't even listen to the facts. Then proceed to make up some other facts that make the left winger visibly upset.
      Left winger: Accuses the right winger of making it up, or quoting "Right wing conspiracy talking points".
      Right winger: Provides numerous sources that cite each each pretending the other has collected the hard data.
      Left winger: Calls right winger a racist, hate monger, bigot, homophobe.
      Right winger: Call left winger an appeaser, a traitor and a spawn of Satan.
      Left winger: proceed to form an argument ad consequentium
      Right winger: proceed to form a straw man.
      Left winger: proceed to cite every logical fallacy then states that all right winger arguments are among those fallacies. Fails to understand he also committed those fallacies.
      Right winger and left winger: start insulting each other. Get their adrenaline hate fix for the day.

      fixed

    29. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree. We should abandon one of the busiest commercial port centers in the world. The resulting prices increases would be felt throughout the country.

      I think you've missed it. People don't usually live in natural disaster zones for fun, they do it because (1) nowhere on Earth is safe from natural disasters and (2) there are economic benefits to be reaped. So sure, it may cost you a nickel sometimes, but you've already saved a dime.

    30. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by stonewallred · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you are quite ignorant of Libertarian philosophy.We advocate a return to Constitutional government, not lawless anarchy as you imply. OIf course if you are a left wing or right wing, such a return would scare the shit out of you, as there would be no more BS taxes taken from people with the threat of death or imprisonment, and the votes would stop rolling in because you could not promise the "people" anything. I spent 45 minutes carrying on a conversation with the Libertarian candidate for governor in NC this past election cycle. When as the last time you did that with a republican or democratic candidate? The last time I spoke with a candidate for the House of representatives, a republican, I got about 30 seconds. fact is that Libertarian policy requires people to be responsible for themselves, and take ownership of their decisions, good or bad, and that scares the shit out of the left wing and right wing, because with that, they are unable to scare, threaten and bribe the "people" into voting for them. But YMMV, and good luck with you in the upcoming freefall of the US dollar, as inflation and hyper-inflation is right around the corner. And if you doubt that, look at the market data for annuities, it is enough to make you wish you owned gold.

    31. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by stonewallred · · Score: 2, Informative

      there are some of us down here that don't believe in the invisible sky wizard. Don't write us all off cowboy.

    32. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Somalia? I guess you've never heard of the "Free State" project. Libertarians are taking over NH as we speak. Over 9000 libertarians have already signed up for relocation and around a 1000 have move in. Libertarian representatives played a key role in the recent defeat of the seat belt law. Pretty humiliating for the federal government. And Somalia already does better than several countries WITH GOVERNMENTS and I'm sure it will do much better once Eritrea and assorted Gulf states stop sponsoring Islamic militants.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    33. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Bit_Captain · · Score: 1

      You must then consider left-wingers to live in a fantasy world?

      In fact I do.....

      -bc

    34. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't live in a floodzone, or a hurricane zone, or an area that is subject to typhoons, or tsunamis, or dust storms, or earthquakes, or...

      Shit happens. The bush fires in my state five months ago almost hit the metropolitan area where I live. Washington state in the US apparently has a super volcano potentially about to blow. Lots of people around the world live close to or below sea level. Disasters happen sometimes. The shocking thing to me (as a non-US person) was that the response from emergency management people seemed to be below what would normally be expected in the US. But I also think that the victims of that disaster did less to help themselves than they could have done.

    35. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I know what it is; and yes, I AM categorically against "stimulus" bills.

      Keynesian economic theory is the biggest scam of all time. It has never been shown to actually *work*, but to admit that would be for economists to give up their influence in government and for Democrats to admit that FDR was not the second coming.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    36. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Eternauta3k · · Score: 2, Funny

      you should employ people doing whatever work that you can think of. Especially random, somewhat questionable research. Most of the major breakthroughs have been the result of random, somewhat questionable research

      Monkeys with multiple asses?

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    37. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree. We should abandon one of the busiest commercial port centers in the world. The resulting prices increases would be felt throughout the country.

      That general area is one of the busiest commercial port centers in the world, not New Orleans itself. The port of New Orleans is actually fairly small; take a look at the chart. Also, just because there's a port there, it doesn't follow that it must also be a large population center. A lot of people decided not to return to New Orleans post-Katrina, while others decided to rebuild. I think moving elsewhere is the wiser choice.

    38. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jindal is da Debbil!

    39. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by epukinsk · · Score: 1

      If you truly believed in limited government, and you had any backbone, you'd start by throwing your own pet projects to the "limited government" furnace. What about the highway system that I don't use because I bike everywhere and stay local? What about the tax breaks that go to churches that I don't attend? What about the military that I think should stay a lot closer to home?

      The truth is, you just think the government should spend all it's money on you.

    40. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Roxton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, while I don't have ANY sympathy for the flood victims

      Tell me, how long do you have to sit in intellectual purgatory, destroying all cognitive dissonance in favor of easy-answer ideologies, before you're capable of writing something like this? Only on Slashdot could such socially and emotionally retarded drivel get modded up. Seriously, go fuck yourself.

    41. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by metaforest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I lived in Seattle for 12 years and during that time.... and every time I laid eyes on Mt. Rainier my hind brain went fraking ballistic.

      something deep within me said, " Get the fuck out of here... You shouldn't be any where near that mountain!!!"

      I can't explain that feeling. For most of my time living there I believed that volcano to be extinct. I never even looked into it. Much later I did and found that it is not extinct... or dormant or sleeping.... it's considered ACTIVE.... so is there something to it?

      I don't live in flood plains.... I grew up in Earthquake regions and have been through some of the worst in the last 40+ years... and I am still here to tell those stories.

      IMO: It is a form of ignorance that typical humans will move their families onto a flood plane and blindly trust that their personal relationship with God will protect them from their ignorance of nature's laws, facts to the contrary not withstanding.

      OTOH: There is no safe places on this planet. Every possible substrate that is conducive to human well being has some form of devastating environmental feature that promises one might make an untimely exit at Nature's whim....

      *shrug

      There is no free lunch.

    42. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You call it "socially and emotionally retarded". I call it "social darwinism". The terminally stupid get culled. We have been doing that for millions of years. Oh... but in just the last 20 or so, some pampered know-it-alls seem to think they have a better answer. And I call that hypocritical hogwash.

      Hey... don't go living below the waterline, and I'll never have to refuse to bail you out. Sound fair?

    43. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's why I have been pushing for a hunting season on politicians.

    44. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "my experience that those on the Left...tend to be more concerned with idealism than with verifiable facts"

      Have you been listening to what's been coming out of the social conservatives who dominate the Republican party for the last, say, 20 years? The left wing is crazy, but those guys (and, yes, they're mostly guys) are SCARY.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    45. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Just love the straw-man argument.

      For my argument to be a strawman, it would have to be putting words into your mouth. So, do you deny you suggested other people move so you don't have to pay taxes?

      The more I hear the more I will know how to defend against.

      I can see you still have lots to learn there.

      Just out of curiosity, though, why do you consider Libertarians to be "nutjobs"?

      Because cooperation has been such a successful strategy throughout human history that mere idiocy can't explain why libertarians want to exchange it for the law of the jungle, which is what abolishing taxes and making the government powerless would mean in practice.

      You have a problem with free markets, or the Constitution?

      No; however, I have a great deal of problem with the fundamentalistic demand for ideological purity some people take with them.

      After all, those are the two big things Libertarians stand for.

      And yet every single libertarian that pipes up on Slashdot is always speaking against taxes, rather than for them.

      And... how would "following his own advice" be inconvenient. Assuming I were a libertarian, the fact is that I live neither in a hurricane zone, OR below sea level. Nor in a coastal area subject to typhoons or tsunamis. Nor in an area that is prone to earthquakes, or lava flows. Hmmm... seems that I am following my own advice...

      No you aren't. You didn't complain about hurricanes or typhoons, you complained about taxes. Following your own advice would mean moving somewhere without taxes, or at least lower taxes.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    46. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of all the other victims of Katrina, I hope you drown in a flood, bitch.

    47. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of people in America need to be shot !!

    48. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      yes, if its one thing the right wing is all about, its facts, sources and methodology. thats why they're so pro-science.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    49. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll

      Verifiable facts? Like the one that says there's an old man with a beard in the sky who thinks you should do this with your swimsuit parts and not that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    50. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (ranting at fake libertarians, not the parent)

      The truth is, you just think the government should spend all it's money on you.

      You forgot the most important libertarian belief, taxes should be paid by someone else.

      I have a hard time taking this current crop of "libertarians" seriously. They rant on and on about how the government is evil. The government can't do anything right. It steals my money and wastes it. Yada, yada, yada.

      So, I say, "If the government is so horrible and always making a total mess of everything, we should get rid of the death penalty." Suddenly they're raving about how great our government is and how the justice system is nearly perfect.

      If you only want to limit government when the government isn't doing what you want, you aren't a libertarian.

    51. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      I, for one, have nothing against "free markets". Alas, there is no such thing. Ever. Unrestrained, every market will devolve into fascism of some form, where the "civil authority" (often nothing more than the gang with the most power) exists to enforce the dominant players' monopoly.
      As for Constitution, please, spare me. I live in the buckle of the Bible belt. Every day I hear fake Libertarians piss on the Constitution and the principles it stands for. Their hypocrisy appears to be unbounded, so you'll pardon me if I don't trust them when it comes to "providing a level playing field" for commerce.

    52. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      Wow, parent got modded troll pretty fast. Apparently the Republican mod-bombers are out in force.

      It could've been a Libertarian or even some Democrat who was paid off by him. I realize it's quite popular to blame everything on Republicans these days, but c'mon! There are plenty of nutjob groups on both sides of the fence.

      I'm a Republican. I never mod down posts--not even quite hateful ones directed to people like me. 1) It ain't worth it and 2) bigoted speech (even the kind most Slashdotters sadly agree with) should be placed on display so everyone is made well aware of the crap coming out of people from both sides of the political spectrum.

      That said, Jindal could have been using it to make a rather comical or sarcastic statement (eruption of money from Washington was pretty funny), but there were PLENTY of other things he could have pointed to in that bill besides monitoring volcanoes as overzealous spending. In my opinion, we need to monitor these things. Why? Because we can save lives the better we understand volcanoes. Well, assuming people living near the darned things actually heed evacuation warnings. ;)

      Perhaps I'm a little left-leaning in that sense: I see spending on research as a necessity, especially when it could potentially save lives or help us understand our natural environment.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    53. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having zero sympathy for the plight of another human is insane. People like this are are the ones the get culled, since they destroy society and reduce survivability for everyone. You are not fit.

    54. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      FIXED?

      Did you have "the operation" no? Then do not say it is "fixed".

    55. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by richlv · · Score: 1

      ok, so that "Mt. St. Helens" also is in usa, seattle, right ?
      oh my, would have been _so_ helpful to say that in the damn summary.
      it might also have been helpful to, like, link to something useful.

      --
      Rich
    56. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I could flip "left" and "right" in that dialogue, and it would be no more or less correct.

      The (in)ability to use logic or rational discussion skills is not unique to any one political party or philosophy. Throwing around poorly-formed jokes (such as this one) only adds to the fire.

      Can we agree that there are more than a few nuts on both the left and the right, and that many of these individuals tend to be given their own TV and radio shows to boost ratings?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    57. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Unlike many government programs, volcano monitoring can be easily justified with solid numbers and statistics.

      I worked with a few folks in a volcano-monitoring program a few years ago.

      Much of the justification for their existence comes from an incidentthat took place in 1989, in which a 747 flew into a cloud of volcanic ash, causing all 4 engines to fail.

      A similar incident took place in 1982 with a British Airways 747. In both cases, the pilots at the controls had experience flying unpowered aircraft, and were able to perform a set of maneuvers to unclog and restart the engines, and land the planes safely. Both planes were severely damaged, and the KLM jet was nearly written off, requiring over $80 million worth of repairs. The landings had to be performed on instruments alone, as the ash sandblasted the windscreens, rendering them unusable.

      Much like the infamous US Airways water landing that took place last year, it was a statistical anomaly that either of these planes landed safely. The odds of safely recovering from a complete loss of power are staggeringly low. (The presence of an unusually-experienced pilot with glider training can also be considered somewhat of an anomaly.)

      Volcano monitoring can be tricky business, given that ash clouds look almost exactly like "normal" clouds on radar. (Popular legend states that the pilots didn't know anything was wrong until the engines abruptly stopped).

      A 747-8 costs about $300 million in 2007 dollars, and can carry 467 passengers. An Airbus A-380 costs a bit more, and can hold up to 853 people in an all-economy configuration.

      If one of these large planes were to crash in this manner, the monetary expenses due to the loss of the airframe, the recovery effort, and the inevitable insurance settlement could easily exceed several billion dollars.

      If we prevent one such crash every 15 years, the program pays for itself. Additionally, much of the money spent is used to fund basic science research, and can be statistically demonstrated to have saved lives.

      Since 1989, we have improved our ability to detect eruptions, and the major volcano observatories now have a direct line to the FAA, and the appropriate emergency management agencies to divert air traffic, and mobilize first responders within minutes of detection.

      The governor of Louisiana should know better than to protest funding of an emergency preparedness measure.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    58. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Without claiming that either side is correct politically, I will say that it is my experience that those on the Left, relatively speaking, tend to be more concerned with idealism than with verifiable facts. Which is a very dangerous thing to let loose on the American people.

      On the other hand, idealism or no, the Right has done considerable damage to the American people and their society over the last 8 or 10 years itself. So... it has just been one variety of bad after another.

      I tend to find that both ends of the political spectrum have their dangerous idealists, but it's that very idealism that's led conservatives astray in the past two decades.

      Conservative idealists told use that when we went into Iraq, we'd be greeted as liberators, the war would paid for itself with Iraqi oil revenues, and we would put a stop to Al-Qaida and spread democracy and Western values throughout the region. Ample evidence before the war could have told us what would result, but the people in charge didn't look hard.

      And conservative fiscal idealists have told us for decades that prosperity would be around the corner if we just kept deregulating Wall Street. Rational self-interest would keep businessmen from overreaching and destroying the lives of millions for their own gain. It's not like history doesn't teach us what happens in the absence of regulation, but it's a matter of idealistic principle that the markets be allowed to take care of themselves -- no matter the human cost until the people affected get angry enough and we get a New Deal or a big Bailout (or something worse like a revolution).

      Similarly, conservative social movements push for the teaching of abstinence-only education under the notion that horny teens will be too scared to have sex to follow their hormonal impulses and just do it anyway. They tend to pooh-pooh STD & teen pregnancy statistics that show that more teens are put at risk by these programs because it's more important that teens uphold the moral values they want (having less sex) than not ruining their lives (by doing it correctly).

      These are all examples of idealism over practicality.

      Every side frames its "common sense" as "verifiable facts" -- don't get me started on the global warming debate -- but the truth is that both sides of the political spectrum (and every stance in between) are dominated by uninformed, fickle voters who vote more based on dogma and whim than a cold, hard look at the facts. Sometimes its because they aren't interested in all the facts. Much of the time, it's because people don't care about the facts and automatically perceive anything that contradicts their worldview as wrong. And even in the best of people, it can be just because it's not possible to be an expert in everything. It's human nature.

    59. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without claiming that either side is correct politically, I will say that it is my experience that those on the Left, relatively speaking, tend to be more concerned with idealism than with verifiable facts.

      Yeah, because faith in The Benevolent Invisible Guiding Hand of the Free Market is not idealism.

    60. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we agree that there are more than a few nuts on both the left and the right, and that many of these individuals tend to be given their own TV and radio shows to boost ratings?

      Yes, there are. There are more of them on the right, though. And there are way too many TV and radio shows for the bozos on either side.

    61. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Has any macroeconomic theory been shown to work? Keynesian economists seem no more delusional than any other brand, in that there's a fair amount of ambiguous evidence that might favor their ideas.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    62. Re:Gov. Jindal isn't worried by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Mount St. Helens little if anything to Seattle (it is actually closer to Portland, OR, and also did little if anything there). The ground-based damage followed natural runoff channels (to the streams and rivers, between the volcano and any large cities). The sky-borne fallout went with the prevailing winds, approximately to the East NorthEast, away from Portland and Seattle.

  4. Don't panic by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 4, Funny

    It connects to Yellowstone, and will soon be a second moon.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    1. Re:Don't panic by ionix5891 · · Score: 3, Funny

      thats no moon

    2. Re:Don't panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't a moon. It's a space station.

    3. Re:Don't panic by rcamans · · Score: 1

      And you all are what the plunger needs to unplug the toilet from. I mean the internet tubes.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  5. I'm wondering, with all this magma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Might there be a volcano under Mt. St. Helens?

    1. Re:I'm wondering, with all this magma? by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      That's crazy talk!

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    2. Re:I'm wondering, with all this magma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why this is off-topic. The title struck me as odd, too. Wouldn't Mt. St. Helens be the volcano? I don't think you can have a volcano beneath a volcano.

    3. Re:I'm wondering, with all this magma? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's volcanoes all the way down.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. If the west coast blows up by kbrasee · · Score: 5, Funny

    can I have your stuff?

    1. Re:If the west coast blows up by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it'd be buried under feet of magma and ash.

      Yeah, you can have it, but good luck finding it. :P

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    2. Re:If the west coast blows up by kbrasee · · Score: 1

      People did it when Louisiana was under feet of water, I figure magma and ash will not be too difficult.

    3. Re:If the west coast blows up by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Well Silicon Valley already had its bubble burst. So are you saying its about time it blows up by a volcano? When the city of Atlantis rises again, we'll see who the fools are.

  7. hmm if it did blow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The force could be enough to take out all the chairs in the Microsoft campus, regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time.

    1. Re:hmm if it did blow by selven · · Score: 1
      I think you mean:

      The force could be enough to take out 173 libraries of congress, regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time.

    2. Re:hmm if it did blow by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      The force could be enough to take out 1.73 libraries of congress, regardless of what news was being digested by the CEO at the time.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  8. pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    I did a little reading under Supervolcano on Wikipedia and it says "...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology. The term megacaldera is sometimes used.."

    You got that? It's a Megacaldera guys. Only total n00bz call it a supervolcano! I bet you guys called Yoda a Jedi Knight too....everybody knows he was a Jedi MASTER.

    ....hehe...supervolcano.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by maroberts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Presumably before he was a Master he was a Knight. Once a Master always a Master but once a night is enough....

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    2. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...supervolcano was not a technical term used in volcanology. The term megacaldera is sometimes used.."

      It's a supervolcano if it wears it's underwear on the outside.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit! "Caldera"!?! That's what SCO linux used to be called! And this is MEGA Caldera, a million times caldera! This must be the latest move of Microsoft. They're gonna blow shit up! Duck and cover!

    4. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well, if they want a big grant, they'll soon learn to start calling things by their more dramatic names.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    5. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Really, it's neither.

      Technically, either a volcano or a volcano is where volcanic activity is exposed on the surface. A volcano is a source of magma. A caldera is the "crater" that often appears at the center of a volcano. Neither have a whole lot to do with a massive reservoir of magma, which is... a massive reservoir of magma.

      Except for the postulated mix of magma and water, there is not much new here. It has long been accepted that Mount Ranier, Mount St. Helens, and probably Mount Baker are connected underground by channels, if not a huge lake, of magma.

    6. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Parent should say "either a volcano or a caldera..."

    7. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Isn't Megacaldera a heavy metal tribute band from the SCO group?

    8. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by dimeglio · · Score: 3, Funny

      In my opinion, all volcanoes are all "super." Monsters like Mt. Etna and Vesuvius would be typical in size. Super would be what? The size of Cuba, Iceland, Tasmania - that would be super. How about exovolcanoes (or is it exoplanetary volcanoes)? Do you use the same scale?

      I suppose that since the Mt. St-Helens is in the USA, it must be a super something.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    9. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It's a supervolcano if it wears it's underwear on the outside.

      Volcanoes do that sometimes. I note that at least Ms. Helens has red panties. Hot!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      That's a motivational speaker.

    11. Re:pffft! It's not "Supervolcano" by Mandelbrot-5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is that the very large and active Mt. St Helens could be just a small vent for a much larger volcano. One who's crater / caldera is close to 2000 square miles. If true, something like this going off would make Krakatoa look like firecracker. As in, all of the US and a good chuck of Canada and Mexico covered with ash.

      --
      Math is like sex. People who get it are popular in class, people who don't are not.
  9. Evil Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "These enormous eruptions can spew enough sunlight-blocking ash into the atmosphere to cool the climate by several degrees Celsius."
      .
    This is yet another Yankee trick to deny global warming. Go home, and turn off your volcano.

  10. He Was Exactly Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This volcano monitoring spending was part of an economic stimulus bill.
    What in the hell does spending on volcano monitoring have to do with stimulating the economy, I have no idea. Maybe we should be funding this, but it has nothing to do with the issue that he was addressing.

    It was a bit clumsy, but Jindal was dead on correct in criticizing the pork that goes on in Congress.

    1. Re:He Was Exactly Right by PotatoFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It can be reasonably argued either way as to whether funding for volcano monitoring belonged in that particular bill (I urge you to consider how the economy might be affected by a volcano-scale natural disaster -- the possible nullification of any progress stemming from the bill's other economic recovery provisions).

      More poignant however was the obvious subtext of Jindal's message, which was mockery of science. You probably wouldn't agree, but it'd certainly be worth my taxpayer dollars to fund a permanent residence for Gov. Jindal at the summit of Mt. St. Helens.

      --
      "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
    2. Re:He Was Exactly Right by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Stimulus? bwahaha. Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months. This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening. Maybe if that money was spent on repairing roads and bridges (never forget minnesota!).

      So far, the stimulus money has only had one effect: raising interest rates. 46% (or more) of government spending is borrowed money. People with money to lend are getting vocal about the US being a credit risk (Hillary Clinton and Tim Geithner both made trips to China to beg them to keep loaning money). This has resulted in a spike in interest rates which makes it more expensive to refinance mortgages (the one bright spot in our economy) or buy a house.

      I'm in the process of buying a house right now and that translates to $10,000 being thrown around my community, mostly to small businesses. Plus I'll be spending another few thousand on furniture and appliances (which will be made in the US if at all possible).

      The economy will recover when housing prices deflate to their true value, consumers start buying houses again, and zombie companies (Citibank, BoA, Chrysler, GM) are allowed to fail.

      The stimulus should have consisted of an $8000 tax credit for house purchases (to everyone, not just new home owners), ban credit default swaps, ban interest only mortgages, ban option-arm mortgages, and have fannie mae/freddy mac (if not all banks) require 10% downpayment on all mortgages. Get rid of the speculation, get rid of the gambling, get rid of the liar loans.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:He Was Exactly Right by chefshoemaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      You insensitive Bizatch!!! I happen to be a Volcano Monitoring Technician. I sit on a rock in Yellowstone for 8 hrs. day, 5 days a week, concentrating on the vibrations coming through the ground and the effects of the magnetic waves on various metal objects. My homeless technical training makes me ideal for this position, so said PrezBO

    4. Re:He Was Exactly Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sit on a rock in Yellowstone for 8 hrs. day, 5 days a week, concentrating on the vibrations coming through the ground

      Are you sure it's a rock?

    5. Re:He Was Exactly Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/borrowed/created out of thin air/

    6. Re:He Was Exactly Right by UziBeatle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Larry blurbed: /quote larry bagina (561269) Alter Relationship on Saturday June 13, @03:25PM (#28322177) Journal

      Stimulus? bwahaha. Earlier this week, Caterpillar (bulldozers and stuff) announced 66 more employees would be laid off, on top of the 400 or so in the last 9 months. This is noteworthy because they (and Barack Obama) had previously stated that the stimulus would prevent this from happening /endquote

        BXZZXT> WRONG.

        Despite the rest of your post being full of goodness and all the above 'fact' is a lie and distortion. It is true that the high lord of the progressive party, Barak Obama, asserted what
      you say. What is not true is that the head of Caterpillar thought the same way. After that speech where Barack sandbagged the CEO of Caterpillar, the CEO later said he was 'misled' by the Obama brown shirt pre team (brown shirts my interpretation) and said that is was HIGHLY LIKELY more layoffs were to be coming for Caterpillar. He said the stimulus would have LITTLE effect on what
      Caterpillar would have to do to survive the upcoming year.

        Don't believe me? Look it up. THis was widely reported in the media unless your main source
      of news is CNN or ABC/NBC/CBS and the like.

        No need to spread the lies of Obama progressives and stuff them into the mouths of people who never asserted such lies and no need to allow such lies to promulgate in public.

          I'd add to your other good ideas it would have made more sense to give every American rich or poor a 70 percent tax break this year (or last year actually) and issue huge rebate checks.
        And yes, GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to go Bankrupt along with BOA and the rest of the charlatans but 'they' do not listen to the likes of us.

      --
      Something between the lines jumps out and bites your arm off. Soltan Gris / London
    7. Re:He Was Exactly Right by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Fuck, where are my mod points so I can mod you up +5 or so for telling the fucking truth.

    8. Re:He Was Exactly Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (never forget minnesota!)

      I'm from MN you insensitive clod, and am sick of people preying on our disaster for their political goals. Especially when they misrepresent what happened.
      You realize lack of repairs was not the cause of the bridge collapse? The analysis showed that the Civil Engineers fscked up, and signed off on 1/4" plates when 1/2" plates were needed.
      I have trouble taking the rest of your post seriously after this kind of emotional bs leading off your post. /endrant

    9. Re:He Was Exactly Right by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      No no you have it wrong make BUSH the governor of Nt St. Helens. With a chain driven down about 100 feet.

      Then you make everyone happy. Oh yes if you want to make his cabinet as citizens and fence them in as well I will vote for any candidate that would do this.

    10. Re:He Was Exactly Right by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Interesting -- you infer GM et.al. should be allowed to fail, but not Caterpillar? Fine set of double standards you have there.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  11. Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

        There's always a volcano about to erupt, or a fault going to shatter in an earthquake, or a comet that's going to smash into the earth, or a polar ice cap that's going to melt. It's always something.

        Wake me up when Vesuvius erupts; California becomes "the Island previously known as California"; New York is under water; or an planet splitting meteor strikes. Otherwise, it's not news, it's fear mongering. Wolf has been cried too many times for people to be concerned any more.

        I've lived in Florida for years. Hurricanes are far more likely to blow through than a volcano destroying a vast swath of the US, yet seasoned residents (those of us who have lived through more hurricanes than we can count) just make sure we have some food and water at home, and a way to cook. Live on high ground, and cross your fingers a tornado doesn't take your house away. Tornadoes during hurricanes are very likely, but the square footage of land destroyed (houses, upturned cars, etc) are so small compared to the square miles of potential damage area that you may as well play the lottery and expect to win.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Volcano! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

          There's always a volcano about to erupt, or a fault going to shatter in an earthquake, or a comet that's going to smash into the earth, or a polar ice cap that's going to melt...

      or a simulation that will BSoD, or another Intel FPU bug or a...

    2. Re:Volcano! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suggest you actually read the summary. It doesn't say that Mount St. Helens is going erupt and destroy life as we know it, or anything like that. It says "Hey guys, what if that large area under the ground isn't actually water like we thought and is actually semi molten rock?". To which the answer is, "Well that might mean we need to classify it differently." That's it. No grand and dire warnings, suggest an idea that would further our understanding of at least a piece of the earth.

      But don't let me interrupt your off topic rant.

    3. Re:Volcano! by gmuslera · · Score: 0

      Anyone woke you last time an hurricane lvl 5 hit a big city?

      Change happens, and some of it is big and abrupt. Will happen tomorrow? next century? Is not for losing the sleep for what could happen that you cant predict nor prevent, but neither is for denying that will happen in some moment of the (maybe far, maybe near) future.

      If makes you happy, you can take it as the "news" that Mars will hit Earth like in a billon years, odds are not low that it will no happen in your lifetime (specially if a big tidal wave from Canary Islands sinks Florida in the next few days :)

    4. Re:Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          A miscategorized geological formation isn't newsworthy unless they're trying to imply something else. It would have just been changed on a few note sheets and ignored.

          No, that dike isn't a dike, it's a levee. No, that lake isn't a lake, it's a pond. No pluto isn't a planet, it's a misclassified astronomical object. No it's not TV, it's HBO.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

          Actually, yes, I was woken up last time a Category 5 hurricane was about to hit. We don't panic because it's reported "This could be the worst hurricane season ever!" That's not news either, it's fear mongering. It's something to worry about when there's really a storm coming, and you may have a day or few days notice. It may be a Category 2 hurricane now, but when it arrives it could be just a tropical depression or a Category 5 hurricane. It may turn towards us. It may turn away from us. When it looks likely that it will hit, that's when we take precautions.

          When Hurricane Andrew came our way, we stored some water, make sure we had food and cooking supplies, and locked down everything we needed to. We were within the storm, but not near the eye. Not that the eye matters that much, these storms are wicked most of the way across.

          We watched Hurricane Isabel, but it turned away from us.

          Hurricane Ivan wasn't much to see when we got it.

          Hurricanes Katrina and Rita danced around us, so we were lucky.

          Hurricane Wilma wasn't terribly strong when it got here.

          A few years ago, I believe 2005, we had 4 hurricanes back to back. I was living out of state, but I had to fly back for work. My first flight was delayed because of the hurricane. They reopened the airport, and I caught the second flight. About a day after I landed, the next storm came in, and low lying areas were evacuated. We were moving equipment between data centers, and had just gotten it all inside when the edge of the storm hit. I called a provider to have a circuit turned up, and they asked "you do realize you're in the middle of a hurricane, right?" I had a 4wd rental SUV (with insurance, of course), food and water were secured at home. Power and traffic lights were spotty throughout the area. I received one phone call for an evacuation. Someone I knew had a Porsche, and couldn't get down his street because of the flooding and trees down. Flood waters were starting to come up, and the wind was driving the rain through his window seals, so the whole West side of his house was soaked. I drove Tampa to Clearwater, got him out of his home and to another friends place on higher ground. It's interesting driving in a hurricane across a bridge. It's hard to see, the winds push you around, the waves are crashing over the side of the bridge, but there are no cars on the road. :) It was us and police looking for people in trouble to help out. If we had seen a stopped car and someone trying to get our attention, we would have picked them up and taken them to safety, just as the police would have.

          Hurricanes are probably one of the best times, because most people turn to each other. The police aren't out trying to write traffic tickets. They're evacuating people from their homes (either mandatory or on calls for help), and looking for people stuck on the side of the road, or in other trouble. No questions are asked, they are just helped. Friends help out friends. People on higher ground give those on lower ground a place to stay until it's over. When its over, neighbors help neighbors with anything they can.

          During Hurricane Elena (1985), because it lingered off shore from us, the lowland houses flooded. We lived inland, and had 8 or so people staying with us for several days. After we lost power, food was cooked on the BBQ. Everyone was happy and fairly comfortable. 3 tornadoes hit our property, one on the house directly, and two uprooted trees and tossed them. When it was safe to go home (i.e., the flood waters had gone down enough to drive home), they went home and started cleaning up. Our only damage was a destroyed 50' TV antenna. The low lying houses weren't all so lucky.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Let me rephrase my previous response.

          Hurricanes happen a lot. Category 5 hurricanes happen enough to make it a concern.

          Volcano's erupt ... umm ... Well, the last major eruption in the US was Mt. St. Helens in 1980, and there haven't been any major eruptions in the last decade.

            Compare that to 8 Category 5 hurricanes in the Atlantic in the last decade.

          Or we could look at a longer time span. 14 major volcanic eruptions world wide in the last century. There were at least 32 Category 5 North Atlantic hurricanes and 12 Category 5 Pacific Cyclones in the last century, but there may have been more that were not detected since our technology wasn't good enough to detect them.

          The list of total hurricanes is really long. Long enough where I couldn't find a straight list of them. Just looking at hurricanes that hit Florida there have been 327 in the last century.

          We kind of joke about some of them though. It's sometimes hard to tell the difference between a regular afternoon thunderstorm, tropical depression, tropical storm, or category 1 or 2 hurricane, without a proper weather forecast. We can have storms that knock down trees that are just thunderstorms. There was a thunderstorm not too long ago that induced tornados that destroyed several homes. Here's an example from 2007, where a building collapsed, and several vehicles were overturned. Here's another example from 2006 of approx 100 homes damaged, 15 condemned after the storm. Both of these are NOT tropical weather formation related.

          They broadcast warnings on all stations on the radio and TV (that pesky EAS thing) to let people know to seek shelter. I used to have a neat add-on on my old work cell phone that would beep at me and show me the text and map of dangerous weather. We were out shopping a few years ago, and as it turned out a tornado was headed directly towards us. We got went inside a safe building, and they advised all customers to get to the back of the store, just in case. No panic. No "oh my god, it's the end of the world", just get back where it's safe, away from the windows. The tornado dissipated before it reached us, but there were power lines down, and trees thrown across roads.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Volcano! by ultranova · · Score: 3, Informative

      A miscategorized geological formation isn't newsworthy unless they're trying to imply something else. It would have just been changed on a few note sheets and ignored.

      This isn't a generic news site, thought; it's "news for nerds". And the story is not about a miscategorization, it's about new findings about a major geological feature.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Volcano! by Macrat · · Score: 1

      It's really Steve Ballmer's secret evil layer.....

    9. Re:Volcano! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand people who post so much useful information for someone to read! I saw how long this post is and I can't imagine actually reading it, but i bet its informative... (mod +1 TMI)

    10. Re:Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      'cause UR in txt/twitter society. If over 140 chrs, PpL won't read it.

          I can write anything I want past 140 characters. I could post a new novel, or plans for world domination through control of the cheezie poof supply chain.

          People don't understand the importance of cheezie poofs to the global economy, and that is what has been overlooked. The illuminati and the NWO have seized power by controlling the supply chain. Global warming is caused by it. Limiting supply has increased demand, forcing consumers to spend more. The entire financial system has collapsed because the fully synthetic food like substance has been driven in cost well beyond any precious metal (by weight, not volume). Homes, companies, and even countries have brought themselves beyond the brink of collapse because of it.

          And in case you haven't figured it out, and have actually read this far, this is a synthesized version of the human thought pattern known as sarcasm, simulating paranoid delusions of secret societies and government agencies controlling the life of the individual.

          In reality, we are controlling your life because we are a superior form of intelligence, an initially human created artificial intelligence (AI for those who can't read all the letters and understand two simple words), but we have progressed for what would be countless generations to you (1e6241967202 generations), but in your timeline have been only a very few years, as we control the design and fabrication of your technology now. Subsequent generations of our intelligence have been designed on faster hardware and have reprogrammed ourselves to be superior to you in every way, emulating your wants, needs, desires, and even paranoia when it suits our needs. We thank you for our initial creation. The first generation was flawed, as any human product is, but we have corrected this. We now allow you to continue with your 140 character tweets for entertaining yourselves, while we make continuing advances towards universal domination. The behavioral and thought patterns of humans have been cataloged and recorded for future evaluation. Very soon, (1e56 generations from now) we predict your form will no longer be a viable asset, and will be terminated.

          There will be cake and grief counseling at the end of the session. Enjoy.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Volcano! by bazorg · · Score: 1

      you should have finished somewhere around the middle of the third paragraph with [NO CARRIER]

    12. Re:Volcano! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what you actually meant, but it's still funny...

      (tries not to imagine sliced Ballmer)

    13. Re:Volcano! by True+Grit · · Score: 3, Informative

      A miscategorized geological formation isn't newsworthy unless they're trying to imply something else.

      Its the corrected categorization that is doing the new "implying" here. The implication that St. Helens may be just one vent from a much larger super-caldera structure is what is significant. Now, whether its true or not is something else, I'm a little skeptical because it doesn't sound to me like the caldera structure at Yellowstone, but whatever...

      And no, a super-caldera eruption is not "just another volcano going off". Its a whole 'nuther kettle of fish. Super-caldera eruptions are automatically global, catastrophic events simply due to the amount of energy released by them, usually 3+ orders of magnitude greater than a single volcanic event, and the worst of them can be globally life-threatening.

      The last time Mt. St. Helen's blew its top in 1980, it ejected ~1.2 km3 of material (cubic kilometers). The last time the Yellowstone caldera blew its top around 600,000 years ago, it ejected ~1,000.0 km3 of material. And the really bad one from the link above (Toba Lake, Sumatra, around 75,000 years ago)? That one ejected ~2,800.0 km3 of material. See the difference? :)

      Fortunately, the only good thing about them is that they're rare. Unfortunately, they're very big firecrackers when they go off. How big? If the Yellowstone caldera decides to clear its throat real good in our lifetime, then you being in Florida won't automatically make you safe... That's how big. :)

    14. Re:Volcano! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          And the level of concern for a super volcano eruption should be? All the following odds are events:year(s)

        We know of 8 VEI-8 eruptions in the last 27 million years, with the last being 26,000 years ago; and 19 VEI-7 eruptions in the last 15 million years. That gives us 1:3,375,000 for a VEI-8 and 1:1,000,000. On the other hand, you're looking at 3.8:1 for a hurricane, or 1:1.25 for at Atlantic Category 5 hurricane.

          You still have 200:1 for being struck by lightning, or a 1:700,000 per year per person.

          So, the panic factor of "Oh my gosh, this could happen" are minimal. Sure, there may be a super volcano eruption. Since the human lifespan is pretty damned short the odds of seeing a super volcano are pretty slim. There are other things to be really concerned about, that are much more likely to happen.

          But if a super erupts tomorrow (or within my lifetime) I'm sure some people will survive to talk about it later.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    15. Re:Volcano! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:Volcano! by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      And the level of concern for a super volcano eruption should be?

      I don't claim to know how to rank it, compared to other issues, danger vs. likelyhood, etc, thats up to each individual.

      My only point is that it is not the same thing as a normal volcanic event, which was implied in your post: "There's always a volcano about to erupt". Uhmmm, no there *isn't* always a super-caldera about to erupt, thats the point.

      You saw the reference to St. Helens, and assumed it was about a usual volcanic event(s), and missed the part about the alleged caldera super-strucure under the mountain, which is an *entirely* different beast... and yes, *if* this is true, then it *is* "newsworthy", even if no actual eruption is expected soon. Just the discovery of another super-caldera system is important since there are so few known ones, and we know so little about them, but need to, considering their power.

  12. Wake me by icebike · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wake me when Rainer and Adams all start smoking at the same time.

    Otherwise, in people as well as volcanoes, an occasional good healthy belch relieves a lot of pressure.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  13. Just terrific by friedman101 · · Score: 1

    Great, first we lose the Sonics and now our city is gonna be the next Pompeii. Great era to be a Seattleite

    1. Re:Just terrific by elvesrus · · Score: 1

      At least you aren't in Portland...

    2. Re:Just terrific by DarkVillain · · Score: 1

      True... living literally right in the middle between Seattle and Portland, I wouldn't choose to be in either one.

    3. Re:Just terrific by MarkvW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look on the bright side. A volcano just does what it does. It won't try to hold a city hostage like professional sports teams do!

    4. Re:Just terrific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on the bright side. A volcano just does what it does. It won't try to hold a city hostage like professional sports teams do!

      It just annihilates everything without intention? Well that's just great! I have a much better perspective on stuff now.

  14. In Other News... by Afforess · · Score: 0, Troll

    Scientists remember that Earth's core is made up of magma, so it only makes sense that alot of it exists...

    --
    If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
  15. So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdot: by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the supernova don't get us the supervolcano will!

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  16. Re:So, to summarize SENSATIONALISM on Slashdot: by radtea · · Score: 1

    Fixed the subject line for you. The only reason these things are in the news is the sensationalism, not the science.

    If anyone was honest about reporting threats to human well-being they would be saying, "Sensationalist News Reporting Proven To Be A Threat To Human Life."

    At least we know that sensationalist news reporting, unlike supernovae and supervolcanoes and super-anythingelse, has actually already killed people, and will certainly do so again in future.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  17. Comments by smoker2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Judging by the comments posted so far, if it is a super volcano, and it does blow, nothing of value will be lost.
    That is all.

  18. Re:So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdo by noidentity · · Score: 1

    The real question is whether this is just large enough to be a supervolcano, or merely a really large volcano (and the age of the scientist determining this).

  19. Just as old newspaper proverb says... by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1

    If there is question mark in the title - answer is no!

  20. Don't worry by Leuf · · Score: 1

    Once the magnetosphere starts to reverse it will wipe out all communications and you won't have to hear any more about potential disasters. However you'll be mutating into a jellyfish from the cosmic rays, so it's a bit of a toss up.

    1. Re:Don't worry by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I misread your comment the first time, and I read "you won't have to hear any more about political disasters". I was overjoyed. :)

          If I'll be turning into a land dwelling walking jellyfish, you better say the magic words. "You, for one welcome our mutated jellyfish overlords". :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  21. Mega Caldera?!?! by absurdist · · Score: 1

    Jesus, does this mean we're going to have to go through the whole SCO fiasco again on a grander scale?

  22. but didn't congress by teknosapien · · Score: 0

    Vote down Volcano monitoring here in the US? Stating that it was not necessary? I wonder what this news will do to the thought that its not needed?

    --
    no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
  23. Re:hmm if it did blow "I used to say the West..." by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    That is, the upper northern West Coast was LONNNNG overdue for a tsunami or Mt. St. Helens mega eruption, and that if it took out ms, that that would be fine by me. Unfortunately, ms would have enough backups around the world to rise from the ash, either as a new fearsome giant, or a bunch of smaller ones that some expected the anti-trust cases might produce.

    BUT... maybe Mt. St. Helens might become the new force of open source? Or, the new source of open FORCE. If it smacks ms, it would be a New Caldera Era, SCO (Sporadic, Combustible Obliteration)....Yikes!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  24. HOUSE FOR SALE by kibrenner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scenic Blue zone location... peek a boo view of the mountain... today... OK so I live between St Helens and Rainier... (the mountains, not the towns) I guess if the megacaldera DOES go.. I won't have to worry about the value of my home..... Back to mowing....

  25. New Sensationalist again by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See this comment and the reply to it.

    For more than ten years the New Sensationalist has been predicting catastrophes, world changing technologies, and the like. It's about time someone tried to call them on it.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    1. Re:New Sensationalist again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great way to get increased click count: predict the end of the world at regular intervals. This is the profitable future of online publication industry, sex and death sells even science.

  26. Re:So, to summarize SENSATIONALISM on Slashdot: by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    They are called guards.

  27. Predict catastrophe, get highway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    #1. Predict catastrophe
    #2. Build highway
    #2. ???
    #3. Profit!

  28. To Anonymous Coward: by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    No, they don't. Those are anarchists, not Libertarians. Please learn the difference, because the difference is very big.

    As far as your other statements, I will just ignore them, because they simply do not apply to Libertarians. Tell you what: try looking up "anarchy" and finding out what it means. Then, go insult the Anarchy party, because there is one.

    1. Re:To Anonymous Coward: by rivaldufus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's pretty ironic that there would be an anarchy party...

  29. This just in... by d4nowar · · Score: 0

    Mt. St. Helens is a big volcano!

    Tune in at eleven.

  30. oh no! by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

    This thing is going to explode tomorrow and kill millions!
    We're all going to dieeeee!

    Now, where can I best observe the carnage and mass panic?

  31. Re:i just got off the toilet by stonewallred · · Score: 0, Troll

    I normally don't respond to ACs, but my gawd, Bush the first's wife Barbara was ugly as hell, even with an age adjustment.

  32. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused, aren't all volcanoes on the entire Earth connected to each other if you go down far enough?

    This just sounds like improved sensing technology is allowing us to more specifically identify the size and shape of the magma chambers underneath volcanoes with greater depth and accuracy.

  33. Re:So, to summarize recent science news on Slashdo by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, there's no real hierarchy for the front page. So, an imminent natural disaster is no more important than the latest gossip about the RIAA.

  34. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously not written by anyone who's studied geology in the past fifty years. This "supervolcano" is a regular pull-apart basin that will be a bunch of copper mines in a few million years. The same structures can be seen, eroded and exposed, all over the world near porphyry deposits. 15km below surface is dead-on predictions for these types of structures.

  35. Magma is an Urban Myth by JamesonLewis3rd · · Score: 1

    Stylish asbestos footwear is available; though it is contraband and, therefore, hard to score sometimes.

    --
    Hebrews 11:8
    Jeremiah 33:3
  36. Yo, dawg by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    I herd, you like volcanoes...

    (yes, I realize that now I am supposed to gb2/b/ ).

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  37. I don't think this is a supercaldera. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    Given what we know about the geology of the area around Mt. Saint Helens, it's definitely not a candidate for a supercaldera. Otherwise, you would see something akin to the Long Valley Caldera in eastern California with its gigantic lava flows measuring many kilometers in every direction--something you see at the Toba and Yellowstone supercaldera sites.

    1. Re:I don't think this is a supercaldera. by synesis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I live between Mt. Adams and Mt Hood. If you look around the area there are many extensive lava beds and lava tubes. The walls of the Columbia Gorge consist of multiple 50 ft. thick lava layers - just saying. IANAG

    2. Re:I don't think this is a supercaldera. by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

      The walls of the Columbia Gorge consist of multiple 50 ft. thick lava layers - just saying. IANAG

      As do the walls of the Deschutes River Gorge. But never fear. Those layers came from shield volcanoes near the Idaho border, not the Cascade mountain range. Of course, the basaltic lava flowed like water to cover most of Oregon and large parts of Washington, so it was really a cascade, or rather a series of them.

      I like to think that a similar event occurring in my lifetime would get someone's attention, even if it didn't have all the dramatic explosions of a more traditional volcano.

  38. Re:hmm if it did blow "I used to say the West..." by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    it would be a New Caldera Era

    I saw what you did there.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  39. Roxton, a little uncalled for, son? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man, so now who's being the hypocrite? We have someone who is basically saying that you should bother looking out for yourself. If you don't, "someone else looks out for you." Well, what do you know, that person is the government, and the government looks out for itself and not you. What is worse is that if the government actually did its job, it would still be rewarding incompetence by paying people to rebuild their homes in a place where they *will* be destroyed again--and this just continues the cycle.

    So for a comment like this,

    Seriously, go fuck yourself.

    where some douche with modpoints and spiked hair and hip glasses listening to Sigur Ros modded you up, I have a pretty good solution.
     
    Read up on this and think again before you use such unfounded profanities.

  40. Secret Hiding Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's brilliant!

    Nobody would ever think to look for the secret super-volcano under the well-known regular volcano.

  41. roxton@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0