Slashdot Mirror


SA's Largest Telecomms Provider vs. a Pigeon

dagwud writes "Just a few days after this Slashdot article, South Africa's largest telecoms provider, Telkom (which has been taking flak for years for its shoddy and overpriced service), is being pitted against a homing pigeon to see which can deliver 4GB of call centre data logs quickest over a distance of around 80km (50 miles). According to the official website, the race is set to take place September 10."

149 comments

  1. The question is... by UncHellMatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...African or European?

    1. Re:The question is... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soldier #1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow. That's my point.
      Soldier #2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
      Soldier #1: But then of course African swallows are non-migratory.
      Soldier #2: Oh, yeah...
      Soldier #1: So, they couldn't bring 4GB of call centre data logs anyway...

    2. Re:The question is... by TheBilgeRat · · Score: 1

      you win. My day is complete!

    3. Re:The question is... by LaminatorX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would assume African, given the locale.

    4. Re:The question is... by BrightSpark · · Score: 1

      Is there anybody else up there we could talk to?

    5. Re:The question is... by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      But this is held in south africa, so they WILL use african swallow.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    6. Re:The question is... by joaommp · · Score: 1

      My money is on the pidgeon.

    7. Re:The question is... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Terry Pratchett's Going Postal did this first!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    8. Re:The question is... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I got 10 Euros on the pigeon as well. God bless offshore betting parlours...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    9. Re:The question is... by joaommp · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir

      I'm contacting you in the name of the office of the Ministery of Transport, Pidgeons and Communications of South Africa. Recently, the former minister has been abducted by aliens and therefore considered Missing In Action. He has left a huge fortune that is to be placed in a bet in a pidgeon running against a telecom. For that, we come asking for your help, as we need a second bank account to transfer the money, since we are unable to do it directly because the minister used strange passwords. I kindly request your account number so we can the amount needed. In the process, you will receive 10% of the amount, making you a turkish millionaire.

      In WEB we believe. Best regards.

      (PS: yes, I know "turkish" and "South Africa" have nothing to do with each other.)

    10. Re:The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at this time of year, larger numbers of European swallows start arriving in South Africa for the summer, so chances are good it would be European

  2. Homers rule! by certain+death · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they will be using an RFC compliant pigeon... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    1. Re:Homers rule! by Aim+Here · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA:

      Anyway I read a Aprils fools white paper about Avian carrier networks a couple of years ago. Basically it is a protocol that uses racing pigeons as a network layer.

      So in all probabilities, yes, it's an RFC1149 compliant pigeon.

    2. Re:Homers rule! by theelectron · · Score: 1

      Don't forget QoS

  3. To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of pigoens hurtling down the highway.

    1. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      - which presents a nice illustration of the difference between bandwidth and latency! :)

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    2. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      - which presents a nice illustration of the difference between bandwidth and latency! :)

      It presents to me more of an image requiring much cleaning up of bird crap.

    3. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by antdude · · Score: 1

      Would there be a pigeon be driving too? ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. the fact that you can out-bandwidth a network connection via Sneakernet is not news, even for values of Sneaker == Pigeon. With a 2Mbit upstream, it would take me over 4.5 hours to send 4GB, which means it's faster to take a thumb drive for most distances < 270mi (60mph * 4.5h), and certainly all distances <= 50mi.. at least for points coinciding with the surface of the earth.

      The latency of Sneakernet sort of sucks though, and I wouldn't recommend it for anything other than the most casual of turn-based games.

    5. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by eta526 · · Score: 1

      Audit trails are automatically generated, and can often be found on logs and cable trays.

    6. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "the fact that you can out-bandwidth [SOME] network connections"

      A faster connection beats your sneakernet. The only meaningful comparisons are either state-of-the-art to state-of-the-art (fastest commercially available connection vs. as much high density storage as you can carry) or, far more interesting, equivalent cost transport media. Don't forget to factor in gasoline, wear and tear, insurance, cost of thumb drive, etc.

    7. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it happens to be hurtling down a California highway at rush hour (or really during any time), I think we could expect 100% packet loss due to 20+ car pileup.

      Just saying...

    8. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they banded pigeons?

    9. Re:To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by MaraDNS · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't recommend it for anything other than the most casual of turn-based games

      One word: Chess

      --
      MaraDNS is an open-source DNS server.
  4. So that explains by jcochran · · Score: 2, Funny

    the order for a large shipment of Ospreys, peregrines, and other raptors to South Africa.......

    1. Re:So that explains by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Because Ospreys eat SO MANY pigeons...
      Ospreys eat fish. Peregrines eat pigeons, yes, but they're not also testing sending the data via trout, so the Osprey wouldn't be that useful.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:So that explains by mckinleyn · · Score: 1

      You're one of those people who can't enjoy anything unless it's technically accurate, aren't you?

    3. Re:So that explains by Abreu · · Score: 1

      You're one of those people who can't enjoy anything unless it's technically accurate, aren't you?

      Stop having fun this instant!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:So that explains by jcochran · · Score: 1

      Odd.....

      I don't find you complaining about http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/08/29/1934251/Pigeon-Protocol-Finds-a-Practical-Purpose?art_pos=3

      Notice the last link in the article.

      Yes, 99% of an Osprey's diet is fish. However, they have been known to kill and eat other birds as well. But attempting to explain a joke is most likely wasted effort.

    5. Re:So that explains by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I would not even put it past that telecom company to hire some local hawk and eagle and vulture trainers, to be on the look out for that pigeon, and place a bounty on its head in the underground market

    6. Re:So that explains by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      MUTTLEY!!!!! DO SOMETHING!!!!

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    7. Re:So that explains by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      -1 Pedantic, +1 Ornithologically Amusing

      I guess it is a wash, then.

  5. Doesn't mention their monopoly by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 3, Informative

    South Africa's largest telecoms provider, Telkom (which has been taking flak for years for its shoddy and overpriced service)

    It should be mentioned that they have a monopoly on landlines and that's why they're still the largest despite all the flak. 39% state owned, and ICASA(south africa's communications regulator) is practically telkoms bitch.

    1. Re:Doesn't mention their monopoly by JavaBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should have tested this on the Comrades Marathon 2009 (89km), giving one of the runners the memory stick, and see him/her finish before the 4GB download completes at the finish line.

    2. Re:Doesn't mention their monopoly by Engine · · Score: 1

      That would just have been too easy.

  6. Old News by Gruff1002 · · Score: 1

    This is really old news who cares?
      Any kind of memory can get lost ever hear of RAID?

    1. Re: Old News by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      We're talking about pigeons here, not bug spray.

    2. Re: Old News by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      As someone else mentioned, it would be RAIP, not RAID
      RAIP: Redundant Array of Independent Pigeons.

    3. Re: Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the data transfer: Oooo, my data just got RAIP'd!

  7. Contest ends by Ghede · · Score: 1

    When the telecom mysteriously transmits allegations from dead employees! Or fire raining down from the sky, that's a popular bet.

  8. Telkom play fair? by pintpusher · · Score: 1

    Will Telkom play fair? Or will they throw resources at the problem to ensure they win? I really don't know a thing about network transport, so what I suggest may not even be possible in the time alloted. The marketing aspects are interesting too. Does Telkom generate good will by taking its lumps good-naturedly and then make real efforts to fix its problems? I suspect that rigging the game could actually do more harm than good.

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
    1. Re:Telkom play fair? by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFA: they had a trial (pigeon won), got in the news, quickly got a call from the telco's rep to get their circuit number so telco could make sure they had good service. Fair? Well not as long as telco is not giving them more bandwidth than they are supposed to have... in which case telco is just doing their job (which they are obviously not doing now). The best part of the article is the implicit suggestion to switch from ADSL to pigeons: the blogger claims they would save more than 80% cost compared to the existing line, or about USD 4600 per month savings.

    2. Re:Telkom play fair? by Rinkhals · · Score: 1

      I doubt it.

      This is getting quite a lot of publicity and Telkom won't like the implications.

      I suspect that they are already hatching (sorry) schemes of which Terry Thomas would be proud.

      --
      "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
    3. Re:Telkom play fair? by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1

      pintpusher: Will Telkom play fair? Or will they throw resources at the problem to ensure they win?

      Interesting choice of words there... considering that "resources" which could help them win would include two shells full of birdshot...

      --
      You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    4. Re:Telkom play fair? by plover · · Score: 1

      Will Telkom play fair? Or will they throw resources at the problem to ensure they win?

      If by "resources" you mean "peregrine falcons", I wouldn't be surprised.

      --
      John
  9. Real time of sneaker net by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    will they be counting the time it takes to get the data from the computer, put it on the 4gb media, strap it to the bird, send it off, retrieve it, and load it onto the end computer or will they just do a door-to-door race?

    RTFA? ME? Do you know what site you're reading?

    1. Re:Real time of sneaker net by AndGodSed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well the "get the data to the pigeon" is probably a moot point since you can release the pigeon from right next to the laptop where you will be sending the data from. Also you can start the send the moment you start uploading the data to a memory drive. 4gb should not take that long to load onto a newish flash disk...

      And then the pigeon will probably land next to the laptop receiving the data.

      And, come to think of it, who says the data via pigeon needs to be computer to computer? If a sysadmin receives it, it is received no?

      Whatever, I root for the pigeon.

    2. Re:Real time of sneaker net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a command for that...

      Sudo pigeon

    3. Re:Real time of sneaker net by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The article is Slashdotted, but let's assume this is one working day's worth of logs, i.e. 8 hours. That's just under 300kB/s.

      How fast was the ADSL line? Perhaps they could get a slower one, and stream the log data as it's produced.

    4. Re:Real time of sneaker net by coogan · · Score: 1

      Believe me our access here is sometimes so crap that we could hand rear the pigeon and still beat the download speed.

    5. Re:Real time of sneaker net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is Slashdotted, but let's assume this is one working day's worth of logs, i.e. 8 hours. That's just under 300kB/s.

      How fast was the ADSL line? Perhaps they could get a slower one, and stream the log data as it's produced.

      Actually the company in question is a financial services company. Those are call-centre voice logs, not text logs.

    6. Re:Real time of sneaker net by Drunken+Buddhist · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia, pidgeon Roots you!

      --
      -1, Disagree is not a valid option. Troll, Flamebait and Offtopic are not a substitute.
  10. Not a fair competition... by JavaBear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Knowing Telkom, this is not a fair competition at all. The Pigeon have an unfair advantage of being faster, and not having the 3GB bandwidth cap that is (were 2 years ago) the norm on Telkom's ADSL accounts.
    And I know I mentioned the information was 2 years old, but when talking about SA Telcom, that makes the it practically fully up to date

  11. Get ready to be... by dreemernj · · Score: 3, Funny

    pigeowned.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  12. My money is on the pigeon by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative
    In their trial run, the pigeon took 48 mins to transfer 4 GB of data. That is a sustained 12 Mb. Quite a decent speed, even for a 80-km link that they are renting for roughly USD 6000 per month.

    The show-down is set for tomorrow (Wed 9 Sep) so we even don't have to wait long for the final results!

    1. Re:My money is on the pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In their trial run, the pigeon took 48 mins to transfer 4 GB of data. That is a sustained 12 Mb. Quite a decent speed, even for a 80-km link that they are renting for roughly USD 6000 per month.

      The show-down is set for tomorrow (Wed 9 Sep) so we even don't have to wait long for the final results!

      The line this company rents is a 1Mbps line (the second largest ADSL line that Telkom offers, the largest being 4Mbps). However customers of Telkom rarely get that 1Mbps, more like 512Kbps.

      The average Telkom customer has a 384Kbps line.

      Short of a special line, or running more than one standard SA ADSL line in parallel there is no such thing as 12Mbps in South Africa, the pigeon will win.

    2. Re:My money is on the pigeon by KrishanuAR · · Score: 1

      To make the test fair they should at least count the time it takes to copy 4GB from the computer to the USB drive, as well as the time it takes to copy the data from the USB drive to the destination HDD. ;)

  13. Bandwidth? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    This sort of thing reminds me of an exam question ohe of my CS professors once asked on an exam.

    "Which is more efficient? (or has more bandwidth)

    1. An 18-wheeler truck hauling a full load of hard drives (filled to capacity) traveling from New York to San Francisco at an average speed of 50 mph.

        or

    2. A T1 line transmitting the same data data.

    (The necessary data was given as part of the exam question.)

    1. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the question take into consideration the time to load the hard drives with said data, move them to the truck (properly secured), driving restrictions (drivers are not allowed to drive more a given amount of time), then the time required to unload the truck?

    2. Re:Bandwidth? by gclef · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but they were allowed to assume a spherical truck.

    3. Re:Bandwidth? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given the fact that this sort of question usually results in two trains colliding, I'd say no. :)

      Otherwise, you'd have to add any number of considerations, such as how much of the road was under construction, whether the driver encountered bad chili at a truck stop that necessitated a lot more stops shortly thereafter, and how bumpy the road was (one good solid pothole and you can consider the need for a "resend" request for at least some of the data!)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Bandwidth? by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Maersk Line did something similar, though they moved their US data centre to Denmark, but they loaded up a plane with hard drives instead of a truck.
      They had to move the data between COB Friday, and be ready to run Monday morning in Denmark.
      I can't remember if they succeeded.

    5. Re:Bandwidth? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Does the phrase average speed not answer your question?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    6. Re:Bandwidth? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

      The answer to this was "an average speed of 50 mph" (in the exam question) which takes into account the road conditions.

    7. Re:Bandwidth? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

      He was also trying to make a point but, yes, everything was taken into account.

    8. Re:Bandwidth? by jcochran · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt it. But assuming current technology, the 18 wheeler wins hands down easily. I'll use Seagate Barracuda 1TB drive as my baseline. Looking at it's size and weight, it turns out that the weight is the main limiting factor. Without special permits, a semi-tractor trailer is limited to 80,000 lbs gross weight. Assuming 50,000 lbs is actually usable for cargo, then at 1.371 lbs per drive, the truck can carry 36,500 drives. The volume that many drives is far less than the volume of a 28 ft trailer. So we're talking a single truck load of drives is about 36.5 petabytes.

      Now how long would that take to transmit at T1 speeds? 1544000 bits per second = 193,000 bytes per second (yes, I'm ignoring any framing or overhead. Shame on me). Doing the math, I get a transmission time of almost 5993 years.

      With that amount of time, I'll assume the truck can travel cross country in 3 days. But to be generous, I'll give it a week. I'll assume assume the handling time for the hard drives is the same at both ends. So in order for the truck to be faster, I have to handle 36,500 hard drives in a total time of less than 2996 years at each end. So I have a budgeted time of only 29.98 days per hard drive at each end.

      Somehow, I suspect it would take a lot less time than that.......

    9. Re:Bandwidth? by Twylite · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not relevant. The truck wins.

      Let's make some conservative assumptions:

      • The distance from New York to San Francisco is 3,000 miles (Google Maps says 2,905).
      • The truck can only manage an average of 18 mph.
      • The truck driver is unionized and will only drive for 8 hours a day (he'll drive weekends for overtime pay though).
      • Loading takes a day (8 hours) and the truck leaves the following morning; unloading takes a day. If the truck is over half-full we will add an additional day each for loading and unloading, just to be sure.
      • Each hard drive is 40 GiB and individually packaged in protective foam, totalling 30cm x 20cm x 6cm in size.
      • All rounding and all interpretation of SI prefixes favours the T1.
      • After unloading the HDDs must be manually plugged in (1 hour overhead per drive) and transferred at 10MB/sec.

      Time on the road is 166.667 hours or 20.833 days at 8 hours per day, which we'll round up to 21. Add a day each for loading and unloading and we're at 23 days.

      In the same 23 days the T1 is busy for 3600 seconds an hour, 24 hours a day. That's a total of 1987200 seconds at 1.544 Mbps (202375 B/s), or 402159.6 million bytes, or just under 403 Gigabytes.

      To beat the T1, the truck needs to carry 11 hard drives. They will fit comfortably on the passanger seat.

      Each HDD will take 1.2 hours to download, plus 1 hour overhead for connecting and disconnecting. That's 24.2 hours total but the IT monkey only works 8 hours a day so it's going to take 4 days to transfer onto the servers (damn that 0.2 ...).

      During those 4 extra days the T1 is still busy and gets another 69.94 Gigabytes. Looks like we'll actually have to pack _12_ drives into the truck for a total of 480 Gb, beating the T1's 473 Gb over the same period (27 days).

      Less conservative assumption: using a 320Gb external USB drive and a motor cycle at 50mph (8 hours per day) you'll make the trip in 8 days, more than doubling the T1's bandwidth.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    10. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My uncle once drove across the country in 3 days, taking shifts with his roommate. But that was irresponsible, and they didn't have computers back then.

    11. Re:Bandwidth? by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      "The truck driver is unionized" - anyone else read this thinking "why would you deionize a truck driver?" =)

    12. Re:Bandwidth? by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Have you ever smelled one of those things? WOW ... I'm talking about ... Just ... WOW

    13. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, I suspect it would take a lot less time than that.......

      Is Canada Post doing the loading and unloading?

    14. Re:Bandwidth? by Higaran · · Score: 1

      For 12 hard drives just ues UPS, it will get there in 2 to 3 days tops. You don't even need a big truck.

    15. Re:Bandwidth? by Mkx · · Score: 1

      If you use UPS, you'll need to do some re-transmits due to damaged packets. Due to long RTT (3 days forward, 5 hours back over phone call) it'll extend needed time to a couple of weeks ...

    16. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did the data get on the hard drives to begin with? And where was it beforehand? And what was the transfer rate from the one form to the other? And why is it not being factored-in?

  14. Bandwidth note by narfman0 · · Score: 1

    If the trial is any indicator, then the speed of the pidgeon was 4096MB / 68 minutes * 60 seconds/minute = 1.003921569 MB/s. Even if they fail, I wouldn't consider Telkom a terrible ISP, given this test alone.

  15. Someones been reading Terry Pratchett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be precise, its one of the plot elements from "Going Postal" (2004).

    In that case, it was between the Clacks (a mechanical semaphore system) and a mail coach over a distance of several thousand miles....

    Have a read, its fun.

    Going Postal (Oblig Wikipedia ref)

  16. here in the US by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should do it here in the US - dove season just opened in many states. Sure, you'll have a lot of packet loss, but the ones that make it thru will be going really really FAST

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:here in the US by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      They should do it here in the US - dove season just opened in many states

      I really had no idea. I thought the US was full of hawks, not doves.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:here in the US by lxs · · Score: 1

      Dick Dastardly and Muttley may foil that plan.

    3. Re:here in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should do it here in the US - dove season just opened in many states

      I really had no idea. I thought the US was full of hawks, not doves.

      "Dove season just opened" means it's now legal to hunt doves.

      In other words, we get to shoot them now. Your original assumption might have been correct after all!

    4. Re:here in the US by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      They should do it here in the US - dove season just opened in many states. Sure, you'll have a lot of packet loss, but the ones that make it thru will be going really really FAST

      So this is just the avian equivalent of UDP?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    5. Re:here in the US by Phoenixlol · · Score: 1

      We're obviously working very hard to keep this image/make it a reality... where's my dove gun?

    6. Re:here in the US by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Can you grill UDP packets after putting a slice of jalepeno pepper on it and wrapping in bacon? Because if so, then yes, the equivalent of UDP. Don't think UDP tastes as good though...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  17. Never underestimate... by Scootin159 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As has been said before, never underestimate the bandwidth of a stationwagon...

  18. RFC 1149 by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

    I hope they're properly using IP over Avian Carriers, as described in RFC 1149! Otherwise, it's definitely not fair.

    --
    Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
  19. Not practical by d-r0ck · · Score: 2, Funny

    The carrier pigeon is not a practical replacement for a high speed link. For one the latency is quite high compared to DSL. Also it may be less secure since it is using a wireless solution.

    1. Re:Not practical by Chatsubo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So now you won't using ethereal to sniff packets. But a shotgun.

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    2. Re:Not practical by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Latency is balanced with packet size. If you can send a single 16GB packet, it may be worth the additional latency, though a lost packet is bad and the delay until you know you need a resend could be counterproductive. Pigeons don't have monthly bandwidth caps - your capacity is constrained only by the amount of data you can fit into a lightweight package and waterproof it, and that combined with the latency relegates pigeons to high-capacity, low-priority data.

      As far as security, you'd want to encrypt the data just as you would sending it over the Internet. Anything sent over the Internet passes through a series of routers, and the data could be intercepted at any one of them. The Pigeon is carrying the data in one "hop", but may be intercepted at points along that "hop". But both have the issue of the data being vulnerable enroute.

      The advantage of a pigeon is that you can prepare your packet to be tamper- and intercept-evident, so even if someone intercepted it and then sent it along its route again, you'd at least know the data had been compromised. With an Internet packet, someone can just make a copy of it and you'd never know it was intercepted.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Not practical by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Also it may be less secure since it is using a wireless solution.

      Ah, but the packets peep when you peek, and peck if you poke!

    4. Re:Not practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you won't using ethereal to sniff packets. But a shotgun.

      What so Ka-Bang (sounds of shotgun), Sniff (poor pidgeon) surely thats sniffing pidgeon

    5. Re:Not practical by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      So now you won't using ethereal to sniff packets. But a shotgun.

      I'm guessing a rifle would be better. A shotgun would probably hit the storage as well.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  20. HP's CPIP in the 80's by woboyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the 70's and 80's, HP in Cupertino used to send engineering drawings (as microfich) to a facility near Santa Cruz, on the other side of the Santa Cruz mountains using carrier pigeons. It was faster and more reliable than using motorcycle courier, and in those days the Darpa-Net wasn't fast enough for the purpose. CPIP - Carrier Pigeon Internet Protocol - good bandwidth, not so good latency, though a packet ACK is easily accomplished with a phone call... :-)

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    1. Re:HP's CPIP in the 80's by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      more reliable than using motorcycle courier

      Our hearts go out to all the dead motorcycle couriers littering Highway 17.

  21. They're not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been a customer for years, and I haven't noticed any problems. (Oh, and first post BTW.)

    1. Re:They're not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if ure talking about Telkom you have to be an employee.. everyone i know in SA got rid of their landlines as 3G via the cellular companies ends up being the better option for web access.

  22. The Pigeon Cannot Win... by manoova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No doubt Telkom will dig up some arcane legislation whereby it is illegal to pit a pigeon against this heavily state-funded telecoms provider. Further, the people organising this will be served legal papers from ICASA ordering them to cease their operations immediately. After many years of lawsuits (and counter-lawsuits) it will be deemed that the organisers do actually have a right to strap USB sticks to pigeons but by that time Telekom will have bred flocks of the creatures thereby preventing any meaningful and productive competition.

  23. A new meaning to the expression.. by mike_slashing · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hope the pigeon wins, but this really does gives a new meaning to the expression 'dropped packet'...

    1. Re:A new meaning to the expression.. by Hangeron · · Score: 1

      I'd be more concerned about TTL...

  24. Done that by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    In my 4th year "Computer Networks" course that was a final exam question except it was the school's T1 line (hey that was fast back then) vs an airplane full of CD-R's.

    The airplane won easily on total bandwidth, but the Doom2 ping times sucked.

  25. Reminds me of the quote... by mrops · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't underestimate the throughput of a wagon full of data tapes speeding down a freeway.

    1. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Credit to Andrew Tanenbaum for that last quote..

    2. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's a South African freeway, you'll have to factor in some serious packet loss due to carjackings.

      Disclaimer: I'm from South Africa.

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey it's no to bad, I'm driving on a South African freeway and nothing bad has [ERROR: connection reset by peer]

    4. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      from wikipedia:

              Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. â"Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1996). Computer Networks. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. pp. 83. ISBN 0-13-349945-6.

      The original version of this quotation came much earlier; the very first problem in Tanenbaum's 1981 textbook Computer Networks asks the student to calculate the throughput of a St. Bernard carrying floppy disks (which are said to hold 250 kilobytes of data). The first USENET citation is July 16, 1985, and it was widely considered a chestnut already, possibly dating from the 1970s[citation needed]. Other alleged speakers included Tom Reidel, Warren Jackson, or Bob Sutterfield. The station wagon transporting magnetic tapes is the canonical version, but variants using trucks or Boeing 747s and later storage technologies such as CD-ROMs have frequently appeared.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    5. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      And pothole and gettin lost due to street renaming.

      Here is to NMR being renamed to Masabalanga Yengwa Rd

      Disclaimer: Also from SA

    6. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      ps. if anyone is wondering about telkom's(helkom :) service check it out here http://www.hellkom.co.za/pages/telkom-facts-and-information.php

      For currency exchange it is about R7-8/$

    7. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      /me *faints*

  26. Bb guns by CoriolisSTORM · · Score: 1

    My bet is on the telecom employee in the bush with the BB gun.

  27. That's an awfully big datagram by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    I wonder what's the MTU of pigeons these days. With modern micro-SD cards, it's got to be north of 8 GB. I'm pretty sure that's bigger than IPv4 can accommodate.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  28. Highest badwidth device by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show that the highest bandwidth device on the planet is a large container ship filled with hard drives. Of course if you need a lower latency device you can always use a cargo 747. If you do the math it blows fiber out of the water. If course of you have a container wash off deck the retransmit time for packet loss in rather high. The TTL for washed over cargo can be sometimes be in the years, such as for these rubber ducks http://rubaduck.com/news/rubber_duck_news-200302-duckies_around_the_world.htm.

  29. Lunch... by mevets · · Score: 1

    The telco should have to deliver lunch as well. mmmm pidgeon.

    1. Re:Lunch... by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes fried pigeon is quite yummy. Unfortunately since a serious bird flue outbreak a few years ago all over Mainland they tripled in price so we don't eat pigeon so often any more, maybe a few times a year, down from twice a month at least. They haven't come down in price really. You can still get them fresh in the market as well (the vendor will kill and pluck the pigeon for you). I live in Hong Kong, for the record.

    2. Re:Lunch... by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes fried pigeon is quite yummy. Unfortunately since a serious bird flue outbreak a few years ago all over Mainland they tripled in price so we don't eat pigeon so often any more, maybe a few times a year, down from twice a month at least. They haven't come down in price really. You can still get them fresh in the market as well (the vendor will kill and pluck the pigeon for you). I live in Hong Kong, for the record.

      And you have to remember to remove the SD cards from the pigeon before chucking it in the pan.

    3. Re:Lunch... by eta526 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a valid durability test for a SD card. I'd be willing to bet that it would survive longer in the pan than the bird would.

    4. Re:Lunch... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Not a fair test as the bird is usually already dead before it is put in the oil. I think that that has partly to do with the fact that you won't want all those feathers in the oil, and that when it comes to the plucking part a bird is most cooperative when dead. And it saves on protests from the SPCA and its ilk.

  30. WEIRD PARANOIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is with all the weird paranoia in the posts today?

    Ex1
    Ex2
    Ex3
    Ex4

    Or did I miss something?

  31. I lived there... by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    I was living in SA until last year. I skipped the landlines and went with Vodacom for my internet. IT WAS CHEAPER AND FASTER.

    This is not a joke. If they are testing a typical DSL landline (which costs a person about $100/month), the pigeon will win.

    BTW...Telkom charges you for the phone line, then an internet connection fee, and then you must purchase a "data bundle" which is all you are allowed to use before your internet is cut-off for the month. Most people stay around 1G or 2G of data. The 4G is pricey.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    1. Re:I lived there... by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      skipped the landlines and went with Vodacom for my internet. IT WAS CHEAPER AND FASTER.

      You're confused buddy. 3G is 2-4 times as expensive in SA (traffic usage), and fucking unreliable unless you happen to be close to a tower. If you're a heavy internet user, then you're uninformed for using 3G in SA - as opposed to using ADSL. In SA, ADSL remains the fastest, most reliable and cost-effective compared to all other retail offerings.

      There's only one thing more evil than Telkom in SA, and that's Vodacom. btw, Telkom has a stake in Vodacom, and the government has a stake in Telkom... The gov has done *nothing* to reduce the high costs of telecoms in SA - this will only change once more africans (as opposed to whites who are being milked - hey, you're white so therefore you must have money) are online and they have a political incentive to get their finger out their asses.

    2. Re:I lived there... by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      $100/month

      Wrong again, you must have dug deep to pull that out your ass - it's about US$19 (~R145 including line +1GB traffic). Sure, that's for the 384Kb line, but still better than dialup.

      But anyway, the root of all evil in SA telecoms is the government which controls and allows Telkom's monopoly. Until that changes, Telkom will keep screwing everyone.

    3. Re:I lived there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for trying to talk about something you actually don't know. The cost of ADSL in South Africa (and I lived about an hour outside of Cape Town), was about $30/month for a landline connection through Telkom. Then you paid an additional $20/month for the ability to connect to the Internet. Then you paid about $50/month more in order to have about 2G of data. It was very UNRELIABLE. The lines often went out, or were so slow you thought you were on dial-up, and this was in a city of 130,000 people...not in the bush.

      The 3G I had from Vodacom gave me a tested download speed of about 1.3M (the ADSL was more typically 384--you had to pay more for higher speed connections). I paid roughly $70/month for on the data bundle of 2G and that was it.

      You seem to be talking out of what you think would be true rather than what is. I set up several land lines and few different 3G. People in South Africa are moving more and more to 3G...why? Because it is cheaper and faster IN SOUTH AFRICA!!!

  32. Never understimate by holmedog · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -Andrew S. Tanenbaum

  33. So... by Ltap · · Score: 1

    Would IP over avian carriers be called "flappernet"?

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  34. telkom not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telkom would loose this one trust me, they are horrific

  35. Interplanetary network testbed!! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    I just realized - IP over Avian Carriers could be considered a conceptual precursor of Delay-Tolerant Networking and the Interplanetary Internet (not to be confused with the Interplanetary Transport Network, which is a method for moving actual things around in the Solar System at minimum cost).

    Using pigeons as the transport mechanism would be a pretty good real-world test of the method. Sure, the transport methodology and the tests themselves ould be simulated in the computer, but where's the fun in that? I could see a couple of universities cooperating on a project to maintain a path using the necessary DTN protocols over perhaps a 100-500 mile distance. There's nothing like a real-world exercise to discover the hidden unanticipated issues.

    Of course, the next challenge would be to design computer games that actually work over a DTN...

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    1. Re:Interplanetary network testbed!! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I can think of some older conceptual precursors. "Mail", for example. Also, "pony express" and "runner." That last one is pretty old. Games have been played by all those methods. "Runner" even involved early cryptography in the form of Caesar's Box.

  36. In completely unrelated news... by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

    Servicemen from Telkom were seen releasing large numbers of kestrels and falcons along the route of the proposed test.

    When asked for a comment, a Telkom spokesperson said "We intend to prove that IPoAC is prone to sudden and catastrophic packet loss due to unanticipated natural events."

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  37. Sustained or burst? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    The truck is going to be more efficient in burst mode, but the T1 is going to be more efficient in sustained.

    As to which is faster, then it is going to be the truck, on the condition you ignore the time to do the paper work, driver breaks, loading and unloading, so on and so forth.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Sustained or burst? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      As to which is faster, then it is going to be the truck, on the condition you ignore the time to do the paper work, driver breaks, loading and unloading, so on and so forth.

      As others have noted, the truck will be WAY faster, and could take an hour break every 5 minutes and still win hands down. Heck, a person with a small rig attached to a bicycle could beat the T1.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  38. Taking bets .... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    My moneys on the Pigeon, as long as there is more than one being sent out with the same packet. That whole Eggs/Basket thing makes me hedge my bet.

  39. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone imagine a Pigeon DDoS attack?

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward. by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      And packet loss from Hawks, and pigeons getting distracted to chase female pigeons (Since all SA pigeons do is chase food and females)

  40. Instantaneous bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen the discussions of the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes, or a 747 loaded full of DVDs. I think you guys are calculating the bandwidth incorrectly. You ought to be assuming saturation of the medium. In the case of station wagons, this means multiple station wagons back-to-back completely filling the available roadway.

    On a real network, peak throughput is measured at saturation and we should therefore measure sneakernet throughput at saturation as well. What this boils down to is the time it takes for a certain amount of data to pass a given point in space. So suppose the pigeon carries 4GB of data a distance of 80 km. Assuming a pigeon is roughly 20 cm long, then a stream of pigeons flying back-to-back in this space would be 400,000 pigeons. Supposing the voyage takes three hours (probably an overestimate) this gives a saturated bandwidth of 400000*4GB/10800 s which is about 150 GB per second.

    I have serious doubts that the land network can achieve throughput of 150 GB per second.

  41. Too much spare time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, have too much spare time!

  42. 2 days in the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The race was neck and neck with a slight advantage to the pigeon. Then BAM!! Out of no where an illegal poacher ended the event prematurely.

  43. Paying homage to Pratchett by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Where the postal carriage was pitted against the semaphore tower.

    And the semaphore company had /exactly/ the same "shoddy/overpriced" rep.

  44. ADSL vs SDSL by LaminatorX · · Score: 1

    I wonder what their upload speed is? If it is asynchronus, they won't be able to touch the bird.

    1. Re:ADSL vs SDSL by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      async. fastest speed available is 640Kb/4Mb IIRC.

  45. A KelKom subsidiary... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    ...devoted to the development of trained Hawks/Owls to take out the competition.

    "In another IT development, local businesses are suffering data transmission losses at an unprecedented rate. One local health official (who asked to remain unidentified) attributed the losses to an increase in Avian Influenza in the region..."

  46. Multiply the Pigeon Bandwidth by at least 4x! by WCVanHorne · · Score: 1

    Since you can easily buy 16 GB micro SD cards the Pigeon can do at least four times better. I'd actually bet they could carry several micro SD cards and do even better. Heck I predict a Moore's Law type curve when soon Pigeons will be carrying a TB of data across the country with impunity and much to the dismay of the RIAA/MPAA.

  47. If the pidgeon wins.... by pscott56 · · Score: 1

    The next challenge is an elderly slug.

  48. Pidgeon vs Pidgeon brained by Guerilla*+Napalm · · Score: 1

    The pidgeon could probably land somewhere, lay eggs and raise young pidgeons and it will still be there before Telkom.

  49. Maximum load? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the heaviest package a pigeon can carry? would they be able to handle a 3.5" HDD?

  50. Going Postal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go read Terry Pratchett's "Going Postal", and then tell me that this isn't spooky.

  51. Is anybody surprised by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  52. car versus line by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

    In the late 1970's in New Zealand, The General Post Office (at that time, Telecom was included) compared transferring data about toll calls via a dedicated line, or disks in the back of a car. The car win hands down! I was in the IT department then.

  53. That's all too unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft, in my hometown in China, real men would burn CDs and carry them on foot, board and unboard buses, again on foot rather than transfer the data over the net.