Slashdot Mirror


Taking Showers Can Be Harmful To Your Health

TheClockworkSoul writes "According to both the BBC and NewScientist, showering may be bad for your health. Apparently, dirty shower heads can be an ideal breeding ground for Mycobacterium avium, a bug responsible for a type of pulmonary disease more prevalent than tuberculosis in developed countries, cases of which have risen in parallel with the rise in showering. Tests revealed nearly a third of devices harbor significant levels of the critter."

431 comments

  1. does CLR kill it? by yincrash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they keep dipping the shower heads in that stuff and it's magically shiny! maybe it'll kill bugs too?

    1. Re:does CLR kill it? by joaommp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      tinfoil hat warning: this is just a new conspiracy from bathtub makers and water suppliers to make us take immersion baths.

    2. Re:does CLR kill it? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why bother with CLR? That's a lot of effort to keep your showerheads clean and safe.

      What I've done to protect myself against this terrifying bacteria is to actively encourage the growth of black mold in my shower, which suppresses bacteria growth.

      This has a lot of benefits:

      1. Chinks in the grout between tiles are filled automagically with an attractive black growth.
      2. I never have to clean hard-to-reach areas, since this is where the mold grows best.
      3. My shower is now cute and cuddly due to the "furry" coating on exposed surfaces. It's like a panda bear, except without the bamboo and pointy teeth!

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:does CLR kill it? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You must be single. Back in the day I had to choose between my friends in the shower or my ability to keep getting laid. It wasn't a hard decision ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:does CLR kill it? by MaerD · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be single. Back in the day I had to choose between my friends in the shower or my ability to keep getting laid. It wasn't a hard decision ;)

      ...the mistake here is not having your girlfriend be one of the "friends in the shower". If you find one that's into "group activities" you won't have this issue.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    5. Re:does CLR kill it? by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just take the old-fashioned approach of thoroughly cleaning my shower from overhead to deck. Oh, wait... that's the Navy approach ;). I guess some habits are worth something.

    6. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Friends don't let friends use the CLR, excessive usage can leave you infected with Mono!

    7. Re:does CLR kill it? by furby076 · · Score: 5, Funny

      See you simply don't care to keep yourself or your family healthy. I change my shower heads, shower pipes, tile, grout, and wetboard once/week. The bathroom manufacturers who came out with this study....err who have HEARD of this study think it is a good idea.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    8. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nobody wants to get infected with .NET!

    9. Re:does CLR kill it? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in the day I had to choose between my friends in the shower or my ability to keep getting laid. It wasn't a hard decision ;)

      So, enough suspense already! Which one did you pick?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be single. Back in the day I had to choose between my friends in the shower or my ability to keep getting laid. It wasn't a hard decision ;)

      ...the mistake here is not having your girlfriend be one of the "friends in the shower". If you find one that's into "group activities" you won't have this issue.

      I have one (well, wife) that is into group activities - but neither of us like dirty showers, nor is our shower large enough for more than four people. So we typically just stick to bedroom activities.

    11. Re:does CLR kill it? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, these bacteria produce goto-linum toxin which is very dangerous.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the bacteria are *inside* the shower head. Do you clean that too?

    13. Re:does CLR kill it? by painehope · · Score: 1

      How about you get everyone in the shower? That's presuming that you have female friends as well.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    14. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's posting on Slashdot. Is it really a mystery?

    15. Re:does CLR kill it? by Erie+Ed · · Score: 1

      This just in Magic: The Gathering players are the "cleanest" people health wise...more @ 11....

    16. Re:does CLR kill it? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, enough suspense already! Which one did you pick?

      I think it's obvious; he's on slashdot, after all.

    17. Re:does CLR kill it? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah with the same toothbrush he uses to clean the toilets.

      Or is that the Army approach?

      --
    18. Re:does CLR kill it? by alta · · Score: 1

      This is /. You're not fooling anybody.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    19. Re:does CLR kill it? by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      Which tells me that the shower head people should design a sanitary head. Outside you should clean, inside shouldn't have places that have stagnant water and harbor growth. The water is chlorinated so if you run it everyday you should be good.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    20. Re:does CLR kill it? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jerry: Hey, you're not giving it to me, man. What's wrong?

      Kramer: I just took a bath, Jerry. A bath?

      Jerry: No good?

      Kramer: It's disgusting. I'm sitting there in a tepid pool of my own filth.

      All kinds of microscopic parasites and organisms having sex all around me.

      http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/TheShowerhead.htm

    21. Re:does CLR kill it? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      All the French Canadians will tell you that you have to use M. Net.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    22. Re:does CLR kill it? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that water isn't chlorinated THAT much... it would be like pool water. The problem is that typical showers stay "damp" and exposed to air from the faucet handle to the shower head. You have a 6 foot tube that's "damp" most of the day. Dampness in the shower head internals is where the mold finds a hold and once it gets growing it would move back into the parts of the head where water movement alone isn't enough to flush it out.

      something like the CLR cleaning would probably get most of the germs, and they probably live in the extra space provided by the rust build up anyway. Personally, I like to take showers that are hotter thanthe "scald" valves at most places, so I'd figure that probably helps clean out things too.

    23. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We may be nerds, but that wasn't funny even to us.

    24. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's still on Slashdot. What the hell do you think?

    25. Re:does CLR kill it? by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      I was going to comment that they don't have sex. But I was wrong.

      --
      Interesting.
    26. Re:does CLR kill it? by Jurily · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the other hand, it kinda defeats the purpose of taking a shower to use a dirty shower head. Except if you take someone else there with you.

    27. Re:does CLR kill it? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I just take the old-fashioned approach of thoroughly cleaning my shower from overhead to deck. Oh, wait... that's the Navy approach ;). I guess some habits are worth something.

      I was in the Navy, too, and can testify that clean showerheads were the exception, not the rule. Unless you used the salt-water shower; I don't think anything could live in that.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    28. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just unscrew the shower head once a month and clean it out. It takes about two minutes of effort and about five minutes of waiting.

      It's something to do while you're waiting for X to unfreeze.

    29. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he's here posting on Slashdot, isn't he?

    30. Re:does CLR kill it? by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And when you DO unscrew the shower head you will find......

      NOTHING!

      Because this story is largely BULL. You can stick a swab just about anywhere and find SOMETHING to sensationalize.

      But having done more than my share of plumbing I can tell you shower heads are as clean on the inside the day you replace them as they were the day you installed them.

      You might find calcium deposits. But then thats also in your tap where you get water to drink or cook.

      Could you possibly find some bacteria? Probably, especially if you live where water is not chlorinated.

      But is there enough to make you sick?

      Well lets think about that for a second: If this bacteria could be washed out of the shower head onto you, then simply running the shower for a minute before you step in would solve the problem.
      And, don't we all do this anyway?

      Tempest. Teapot.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    31. Re:does CLR kill it? by tfmachad · · Score: 1

      How about you get everyone in the shower? That's presuming that you have female friends as well.

      "As well"? So you are saying that you'd bring men to the shower with you provided there were a couple of girls to go along?

      No, sir, thank you very much. No schlongs around me one way or the other.

    32. Re:does CLR kill it? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      You must have been surface fleet ;).

    33. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be single.

      And you must be new here ...

    34. Re:does CLR kill it? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You mean like covered in Microban? I'm surprised it's not out on the market yet. Everything has Microban these days.

    35. Re:does CLR kill it? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Girlfriends may be cute, but ideally they're not terribly furry. Unless you're into that. I'm not.

    36. Re:does CLR kill it? by RxScram · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey, without a surface fleet, we wouldn't have any targets to kill!

    37. Re:does CLR kill it? by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      Well actually meaning smooth on the inside such that when flow is present there are no voids or stagnant areas present. And that it can drain down given the oppurtunity. That and made of materials that wont leach nasty stuff into the water.

      The problem isn't showers, but rather stagnant water alowing stuff to grow.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    38. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - but for the truly paranoid one can just use copper pipes and copper showers heads. Copper kills bugs dead.

    39. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither?

    40. Re:does CLR kill it? by Thiez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since the water that goes through that tube is clean, and the tube was (probably) clean when you got it, what exactly is this mold eating?

    41. Re:does CLR kill it? by whitelabrat · · Score: 5, Funny

      No doubt. Forget how dirty the shower head is. Try swabbing a human. Yucky people.

    42. Re:does CLR kill it? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny.

      And what ever you do, always assign your apprentice to deal with the shower drain pipes.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    43. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our shower heads start turning red- what bacteria is that?

    44. Re:does CLR kill it? by icebike · · Score: 1
      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    45. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be single.

      Or british.

    46. Re:does CLR kill it? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Worse: gator navy. If surface fleet are your idiot cousins, then the gators are the offspring of two idiot cousins.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    47. Re:does CLR kill it? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      What has .NET got to do with this ?
      Microsoft, no just for Windows! Now keeping your toilets clean.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    48. Re:does CLR kill it? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Said chemical is especially dangerous in combination with Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO).

      --
      $ make available
    49. Re:does CLR kill it? by jonbryce · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He's on Slashdot, so probably neither.

    50. Re:does CLR kill it? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Nice one... "there are two classes of naval vessels: submarines and targets."

    51. Re:does CLR kill it? by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it kinda defeats the purpose of taking a shower to use a dirty shower head. Except if you take someone else there with you.

      That is an entirely different "dirty shower head".

    52. Re:does CLR kill it? by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      You see, it's a joke. Look it's like this, CLR is the name of a commercial cleaner that gets it's name from what it targets; Calcium, Lime, Rust. CLR is also an acronym for the Common Runtime Language which is what all .NET languages compile down to. The intentional use of one in place of the other is intended to be humorous. However you should be aware that it loses it's humor if it has to be explained.

    53. Re:does CLR kill it? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the big deal is. Just take a shower afterwards and you'll be ok.. Oh, wait..

    54. Re:does CLR kill it? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I just unscrew the shower head once a month and clean it out. It takes about two minutes of effort and about five minutes of waiting.

      So, I'm curious.. do you have, like, another shower which goes completely unused most of the time, set aside for washing the shower head from your other shower?

    55. Re:does CLR kill it? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Unless you used the salt-water shower; I don't think anything could live in that.

      You could get a nasty lamprey infestation...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    56. Re:does CLR kill it? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      forsooth. i once came back from summer break, and my roomate's had let there girlfriends use the house during summer classes, and there was, i shit you not, a 4 foot long drain wookie in the shower. smelled like feet in a nest of dead skunks.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    57. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Oh, ozane.

    58. Re:does CLR kill it? by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The second link indicates the risk is greatly reduced if you just let the water run for 60 seconds before getting in. I would think that practice is actually more common than not as most folks don't jump into a cold shower. I do often step into the shower stall itself and wait while the water gets warm, but the article also warns against that as well. The reason being the atomized water with high concentrations of bacteria are easily breathed in during that initial blast of water and air even if you are not directly under the flow of water.

      In any case, a simple change of habit to simply turn the water on and wait outside of the shower stall for 60 seconds.

    59. Re:does CLR kill it? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Since the water that goes through that tube is clean, and the tube was (probably) clean when you got it, what exactly is this mold eating?"

      Take a new plastic cup. Fill it full of hot water. Let it sit out for a month. What do you get? An empty cup, water evaporated, no mold.

      I also call bull. If you have anything to worry about it's the dirty crap that goes down the drain.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    60. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I come from, that's 1/3 of the total time the local government recommends you take, for the sake of water conservation. I'm not in the sticks, either; I live in a city of nearly 2 million.

      I don't know if anybody actually pays attention to that recommendation, though. I sure as hell don't.

    61. Re:does CLR kill it? by Meski · · Score: 1

      dirty shower sex?

    62. Re:does CLR kill it? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      you'll likely find worse things inside your kitchen sink faucet than in the showerhead. Sensationalist, indeed. Thank goodness I've worked the home cleaning industry long enough to see past this nonsense.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    63. Re:does CLR kill it? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Bet most any cigar boat will outrun any torpedo. With speeds rivaling some of the fastest on-land vehicles, torpedoes don't stand a chance.

      That's why there are three classes of naval vehicles, submarines, targets, and runners.

      Runners FTW. High-sped depth charge dropping mofos to blow your ass out from under the water.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    64. Re:does CLR kill it? by st0nes · · Score: 1

      But is there enough to make you sick?

      Probably not, but let that not detract from the general hysteria that surrounds the existence of bacteria specifically and "germs" generally. Think of those ridiculous ads on the telly where Mom goes *gasp* shock-horror because there may be a germ on her kitchen floor. She cleans the floor with the latest anti-bacterial-floor-cleaning-crap and then we get to see her radiantly healthy, smiling offspring. I don't have a link to it, but there was research that shows that the incidence of allergies and asthma has increased markedly since our obsession with hygiene began. The hypothesis is that the immune system needs to be exposed to a variety of pathogens in early life to develop properly. Why do humans want to live in a sterile environment, anyway? I am fortunate enough to live on the edge of a wilderness surrounded by wildlife. I tolerate the bacteria in my showerhead in the same way as I tolerate the baboons on my roof or the chamelions in my trees. Provided they don't cause unpleasant smells, or otherwise imact negatively my quality of life, then live and let live.

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
    65. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    66. Re:does CLR kill it? by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      like the old joke.

      Question: How do you you hide sixpence in an English Household?

      Answer: You put it under the soap!

    67. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey baby. How about you let me swab you and see how disgusting you are?

    68. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Dan Brown. I bet the Baptists are in on it too. :-)

    69. Re:does CLR kill it? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It amazed me that these adverts said something like 'kills 99% of bacteria' as if it is a selling point. That means, after one application, you have 1% the number of bacteria, but all are immune to your cleaning product. After seven divisions (which can take as little as half an hour each for some bacteria), you have more bacteria than you started with and, best of all, the next time you clean with the same product, you don't kill any. At most, these products are going to give you a couple of days worth of protection.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    70. Re:does CLR kill it? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      You're right and you're wrong. Modern torpedoes will nail just about anything, including said cigar boat.

    71. Re:does CLR kill it? by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      If CLR doesn't kill it you could always dip it in bleach over night. Plus bleach is really cheap and even a diluted bath will work.

    72. Re:does CLR kill it? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The Mark 48 only does 55 knots, and is the fastest torpedo in the US inventory. Cigar boats go WAY faster.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    73. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? Who the hell modded this 'insightful'

      "Well lets think about that for a second: If this bacteria could be washed out of the shower head onto you, then simply running the shower for a minute before you step in would solve the problem."

      No one sees the glaring logic flaw with this? Seriously? Hasn't anyone with mod points today ever had enough biology to know how bacteria live?

    74. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably all who know how bacteria live also know how water flows. And culture that had built up while water was off, gets flushed in the first few seconds. By the time the water gets hot, virtually all flushable cultures are down the drain.

      From then on you are dealing with occasional two or three cell clusters washing onto your soapy body.

      Bacteria + Soap. Not a scenario for growth.

      We already know YOU don't have mod points. And Now you've made it perfectly clear you flunked biology as well.

    75. Re:does CLR kill it? by emilper · · Score: 1

      60 seconds would be enough if you shower in a airlock and can cycle the atmosphere ...

    76. Re:does CLR kill it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will CLR kill them? I need to know, there seems to be an infestation.

    77. Re:does CLR kill it? by recreant · · Score: 1

      One study found that the inside of our mouths most closely resemble the scum growing on the bottom of ponds. And that's just the start of the alimentary canal.

    78. Re:does CLR kill it? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean "boiling" but that's not how things work. You take showers in that tub every day... you add and subtract the little critters daily and they swirl around your bathroom... they've done studies about bathroom germs and it's kind of creepy, they pretty much go everywhere.

      The key is DAMP and warm, it's what germs love. You add water every day and it sits collecting germs and then evaporates slowly all day... the germs live in the oils (soap and stuff you wash off) and dust (mostly skin flakes) mixed up that settles on stuff. The water from your shower isn't nearly enough to kill all the little critters, even strong bleach and disinfectant doesn't go everywhere without taking way to much time. Evolution rules... the strong survive and the weak die until you have a nice little life cycle going right under your nose.

    79. Re:does CLR kill it? by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      Not that it will change anything, or mean anything for that matter, but someone had to do the math:

      (~1.5 gpm show heads) * (1 minute pre-run) * (1 shower/day) * (228,000,000 adults) / (648,000 gallons / pool) = more than 351 Olympic-sized swimming pools per year! http://homerepair.about.com/od/plumbingrepair/ss/tankless_hwh_7.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Cubic_capacity_olympic_size_swimming_pool


      does it all mean anything? I don't know...

    80. Re:does CLR kill it? by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      About as significant as leaky faucets, toilets, and shower heads. Millions of gallons wasted every year, yet people will do nothing to repair them. Until local instant-on water heaters are common in new homes, people will forever be running cold water until it gets warm for their showers. I would think this would be a good opportunity for a 'coated' shower. You know, those anti-bacterial coatings available for some surfaces that kill bacteria? Either that or a renewed rush for metal shower heads which seems to be affected less ;)

    81. Re:does CLR kill it? by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      I would actually posit that leaky fixtures waste more water than pre-running of showers. This is really a waste because the repair of a leaky faucet is an inexpensive, quick operation. Even with the ridiculously-expensive replacement parts sold by faucet makers (~$2 for a seal kit which contains about $0.04 worth of materials and $0.10 of packaging), it is still a worthwhile operation. Unfortunately, however, no one in this society wants to believe that anything can be manually repaired anymore.

      As for metal shower heads being affected less, I think that it has much to do with the high percentage of copper in the allows used to make plumbing fixtures. Copper and it's common alloys are naturally anti-microbial (http://www.copper.org/antimicrobial/). They will also last longer than plastic fixtures.

    82. Re:does CLR kill it? by painehope · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm hetero but I'd be lying if I said I hadn't that I shared a chick or multiple chicks with a friend or three.

      Ever heard that joke about "flip you for head or tail?"

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  2. Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Taking showers 'can make you ill'
    Showering may be bad for your health, say US scientists

    OMG! OMG! Wait, the article goes on to say:

    "These bacteria [â¦] rarely cause disease in healthy people. Further work will need to look at whether finding these organisms is associated with any increased risk of infection."

    Thanks, BBC.

    1. Re:Sensationalism by MrNemesis · · Score: 5, Funny

      As the wonderful Daily Mash points out;

      "Nevertheless it is better to carry the heady stench of the Gaul than expose yourself to the sort of tiny risks that generate gigantic headlines."

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    2. Re:Sensationalism by blankinthefill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True... but rarely is not never. And its not hard to weaken your immune system. Not getting much sleep? Not eating healthy? Got the flu, or maybe just a cold? High stress levels? Bam, weakened immune system. And I know that personally one of the things that I generally do after a long day with little to no sleep or food, when I'm feeling bad... is take a shower.

    3. Re:Sensationalism by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      GEEKS REJOICE!!!

    4. Re:Sensationalism by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      and the article glosses over that MOST water supplies in the USA are so heavily chlorinated, that the chance of this happening are nearly ZERO.

      So if you have well water, you're hosed.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Sensationalism by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I like taking showers. I find them Both Relaxing and Invigorating.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Sensationalism by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      No kidding. MAC pretty much only causes problems in immunocompromised people (eg, people with HIV, cancer and on chemo, etc.).

    7. Re:Sensationalism by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      And then it's only in people who are REALLY immunocompromised. MAC doesn't generally show up until you have a CD4+ T-cell count of 50/mcL. A normal healthy person has more than 10 times that number of CD4+ T-cells.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    8. Re:Sensationalism by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      Stepping out your door can lead to a fatal death! more at 11!

    9. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also appears to only apply to those who stand in front of the shower head immediately after turning it on. Who does that? Gotta let it warm up first.

    10. Re:Sensationalism by mea37 · · Score: 1

      And I know that personally one of the things that I generally do after a long day with little to no sleep or food, when I'm feeling bad... is take a shower.

      Very good. And how many times has it made you sick?

      Of course, with the degree to which the mind influences the immune system, it might make you sick the next time you do it...

    11. Re:Sensationalism by AndyGJ · · Score: 1

      Replying to remove bad mod. Went for Goat, hit troll.

    12. Re:Sensationalism by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Indeed! To the list of terrorists, child-abusers and food shortages, lets now add showers to the list of things we need to be terrified, TERRIFIED, about!

      If your immune system is weakened by a few late nights and an approaching deadline, then you have bigger problems. Outside of the city, where people are still not pudgy little babies for life, rural townsfolk live in constant fear of water shortages, bad crops and snakes biting their kids all the while working hard day in day out (there is no week end for a farmer) without the absurd levels of "leisure" and "unwinding" options that city folk have.

      Believe it or not, they aren't all dying by the droves in their shower cubicles.

      --
      I hate printers.
    13. Re:Sensationalism by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, my outdoor faucets are from the irrigation ditch coming from the river.

    14. Re:Sensationalism by Quothz · · Score: 5, Informative

      and the article glosses over that MOST water supplies in the USA are so heavily chlorinated, that the chance of this happening are nearly ZERO.

      Au contraire. Truth is not arrived at by listening to the voices in your head,* but by rigorous scientific study. For example, let's have a look at Chlorine Susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Effect of Growth in Biofilms on Chlorine Susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare, two entirely independent studies.

      It would appear that those published, peer-reviewed studies disagree with you. In particular, a quote from the former:

      . . . M. avium has been isolated from a variety of sources, including municipal drinking water systems . . .

      Whether M. avium is worth any worry is up for debate. Whether it exists in our water supplies is not. It probably isn't a great cause for concern, although it's nice to know that it's being looked into with more thoroughness than someone waving vaguely and going "naaaaah".

      * Which I assume also whisper to you that the best way to denote emphasis is by capitalizing words in their entirety. They're wrong about that, too.

    15. Re:Sensationalism by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh no. Chlorine is not as effective on that bacteria, and actually that's why it and not other bacteria that tends to be there :).

      See: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/health/15shower.html

      "M. avium tends to be a particular problem in municipal water supplies, Dr. Pace said. The reason is that cities treat their water with chlorine, a poison that kills most bacteria but gives avium a selective advantage."

      --
    16. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and the article glosses over that MOST water supplies in the USA are so heavily chlorinated, that the chance of this happening are nearly ZERO.

      So if you have well water, you're hosed.

      And if you shower in hose water, your welled.

    17. Re:Sensationalism by lorenlal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seriously don't think there's any amount of filth and nasty that can ever approach my keyboard... except maybe my mouse.

    18. Re:Sensationalism by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fatal deaths are a worry. I'm not too concerned about the other types though.

      --
      I hate printers.
    19. Re:Sensationalism by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      sorry, but truth is not arrived by rigors scientific study. The only thing that can offer absolute truth is religion. rigors scientific study only gives best guess with current information.

      Of course religions absolute truth requires a leap of faith in that truth, where rigors scientific study produces actually reproducible results.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    20. Re:Sensationalism by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      Huh? From reading the disdainful comments regarding bottled water on /. I figured the tap water in the US was drinkable. Which is it?

    21. Re:Sensationalism by BobMcD · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course you're failing to realize that science is fast becoming a religion all unto itself.

    22. Re:Sensationalism by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      sorry, but truth is not arrived by rigors scientific study. The only thing that can offer absolute truth is religion.

      Well, no.

      Rigorous (not "rigors") scientific study can provide a justified belief in a reasonable approximation of truth on questions of fact, whereas non-scientific means, when applied to questions of fact, can produce only unjustified beliefs (whether the belief regards absolute truth or not.)

    23. Re:Sensationalism by BitHive · · Score: 1

      RON PAUL says AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS are SCIENCE

    24. Re:Sensationalism by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Science tells me you are full of shit.

      Rural adults are more likely to be obese, and are less physically active than urban adults: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15085629

      Rural children are more obese than urban children, IN SPITE of being slightly more physically active:
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19007396?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed

    25. Re:Sensationalism by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually science has been many religions unto itself for a long time:

      Translation: "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." -- Max Planck (translated)
      from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Max_Planck

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    26. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How Very Capitol Of You!

    27. Re:Sensationalism by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well water is not exposed to passing/flying/swimming and occasionally sick/dead critters the way surface water supplies are. Guess which is more likely to contain microbes -- sand and rocks, or critters??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    28. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So if you have well water, you're hosed."

      9/10 :)

    29. Re:Sensationalism by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. In most towns and cities, I can't even DRINK the water without some heavy filtration. And those water filters don't block chlorine for very long before they need replaced.

    30. Re:Sensationalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      In other news, showers are full of Dihydrogen Monoxide. This must be stopped. Won't somebody please think of the CHILDREN!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    31. Re:Sensationalism by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Anything that requires faith is not truth.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    32. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't have fancy reports to refer to, but I *do* have the memory of having lived in not one but 3 different rural areas before moving to a big city.

      But hey, what do I know? I'm just a guy and that's an official looking report.

    33. Re:Sensationalism by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      There is no truth without faith.

      I have no faith and know no truth.

      Anyone tells you different is selling you something.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    34. Re:Sensationalism by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Ohh, i realize it. Anytime I hear the term "Scientific fact" or "Scientifically proven." Neither of which will ever happen. Science can only provide repeatable results as evidence of truth.

      Religion is the only entity that can sell absolute truth due to the fact that they can change your faith to make what ever they want to be true.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    35. Re:Sensationalism by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the gap between anecdote and statistics... Enjoy your stay. :)

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    36. Re:Sensationalism by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Anytime I hear the term "Scientific fact" or "Scientifically proven." Neither of which will ever happen.

      Actually there are tons and tons of scientific facts, a fact is nothing more than a measurable observation. When I state "The atomic number for gold is 79," this is an scientific fact. Just like me saying, "water is a molecule comprised of 2 atoms of hydrogen, and 1 atom of oxygen". What bothers me is when people claim the linkages between these facts (theories) are True (in the capital "t" sense), or proven.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    37. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except maybe my mind!

    38. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm never using a water fountain (aka bubbler) again! Gross!

    39. Re:Sensationalism by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      the water in some cities in the US are so heavily chlorinated, i have little doubt they would kill a large carp. Honestly, i cant drink the stuff. i get it about a foot from my mouth and smell the chemicals, and its "do we have any juice? or maybe a coke?"

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    40. Re:Sensationalism by leilani238 · · Score: 1

      Well said. But for the many, many cases for which we haven't tested, can't test due to ethical concerns, or can't sort out due to the massive complexity of the systems, well, we're not left with much to go on, are we? Part of science is that even things that are firmly believed can be unseated with appropriate evidence, and here we are overturning things all the time (cholesterol, fat, alcohol - all have piles of evidence on both sides about health benefits and risks), and it's hard not to blame people for growing a little weary of it all and starting to not trust things that are published. It's a shame so much of the weariment comes from the popular sensationalism ("For most people, taking a shower is not dangerous" - the disease is still quite rare even where people shower a lot) rather than the actual overturning of previous beliefs. There was a recent article in Science News (can't find it now) arguing how scientists really need to change their language when they talk to the public: particularly, that we're not completely overturning ("revolutionizing" is too commonly used) what we knew before, merely filling out pieces that were missing. Showers aren't all of a sudden dangerous, and we haven't invalidated the things we knew before about bacterial growth if you don't wash yourself (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-477378/Six-weeks-wash-The-soapless-experiment.html) or the history of humanity before sanitation... but all this is lost under the mound of social taboos against not showering and the mass of advertising (and more social expectation) that you should use various products, without investigation into safety.

    41. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking showers 'can make you ill'
      Showering may be bad for your health, say US scientists

      OMG! OMG! Wait, the article goes on to say:

      "These bacteria [â¦] rarely cause disease in healthy people. Further work will need to look at whether finding these organisms is associated with any increased risk of infection."

      Thanks, BBC.

      In other words, showering considered harmful?

    42. Re:Sensationalism by rve · · Score: 1

      and the article glosses over that MOST water supplies in the USA are so heavily chlorinated, that the chance of this happening are nearly ZERO.

      So if you have well water, you're hosed.

      All the chlorination does is make the water taste and smell bad.

      If you want to sterilize the water, you'll need to add so much chlorine that the water becomes dangerous to drink. Screw chlorination, it's disgusting and completely pointless.

      Many people don't notice it anymore because they're so used to it that they forget what water is supposed to taste and smell like. Leave the country for some time, and when you come back, and taste the tap water, you'll find yourself buying bottled water.

    43. Re:Sensationalism by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Scientific Fact: I take a 10-gauge shotgun loaded with buck shot, point it at your head, chamber the round, and pull the trigger, you're fucking dead.

      Argue that one, smartass. It's universal to anything with a nervous system, from hominids to annelids.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    44. Re:Sensationalism by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You are aware that there are wells contaminated with natural gas, right?

      One lady puts a lighter to her faucet when it's on and the water lights up.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    45. Re:Sensationalism by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Got a cat? Bet you that cat box is FAR filthier.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    46. Re:Sensationalism by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen any flammable water (that would make a fun party trick!), but well water can contain all manner of solubles. However, it doesn't normally come with free bacteria, unless the well is very shallow.

      [My own well is 405 feet deep, and hits water starting at 270 feet below the surface. I doubt there's much of anything organic down there.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific Fact: I take a 10-gauge shotgun loaded with buck shot, point it at your head, chamber the round and pull the trigger

      *click*. You put the brass flange at the front again, didn't you?

    48. Re:Sensationalism by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Then put flourine in. I'm not going to be beaten by a bunch of goddam bugs!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    49. Re:Sensationalism by Larryish · · Score: 1

      It is no longer called a "keyboard".

      It is now known as a "skeet catcher".

      Get with the times, man.

    50. Re:Sensationalism by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      or at least it has been true in almost every observation so far. Sometimes there have been fireing pin problems or the powder got wet, or the round was miss loaded, so no there is a less than 100% chance I will be dead.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    51. Re:Sensationalism by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      They already do. Most water systems are also treated with Hydrofluorosilicic acid to create Flouride ions in the water for dental health benefits.

      That crap is nasty. I remember that the floor around the holding tank at the Water treatment plan I worked at being eaten away. Hell it will etch glass at an alarming rate.

      Water systems have a HIGH doseage rate of Cl2 and they do check for that specific bug with regular water sampling throughout the city.

      yes it's a "possibility" but it's probability is lower than you getting hit by a train AND a jet at the same time while you are in your shower.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    52. Re:Sensationalism by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      bacteria from a well is a STRONG possibility. its easy to contaminate a well. hell, Many farmers poison their own families if they store fertilizer wrong. The nitrogen will get into their well water and poison them fast.

      http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/plantsci/soilfert/eb64w.htm

      when I worked as a Water Chemist we would have at least 4 calls a year to test a farm's well for nitrogen contamination.

      drinking critters is far less risky than drinking chemical contamination.

      Plus these bugs are way down on the harmful chain compared to the nasties that the water filtration facilities are treating for.

      Go get yourself a case of Amoebic Dysentery or Guardia-Lamblia.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    53. Re:Sensationalism by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Shallow wells (first water, which in some areas can be just a few feet down -- in MT I had water coming up in a hole only a foot deep!) or old-fashioned wells that lack casing -- yeah, whatever leaches down from up top can be an issue. That's why septics are required to be NNN-feet away (really should apply to barns too), and why modern wells are usually cased and sealed all the way up -- to prevent rodents, dirt, manure, and what-have-you from falling in, and to keep surface water out.

      And surface storage and piping can be contaminated easily enough, through any gap in the system.

      But deep wells that are 2nd water or below -- there's no nutrient down there, and if they're properly cased and the top sealed, there's no surface leaching or access, thus no bugglies in the well itself.

      First water here is about 100-150 feet. It's safe enough but a bit high in magnesium salts (tastes "dusty"). Second water is 250-500 feet and very high in calcium (but tastes better). The local municipal wells are about 1500 feet. (There's a thick layer of calichi starting at 6-10 feet that's effectively impermeable, and no organics below that.) 2nd water and below actually comes from hundreds of miles away, filtered thru lots of rock. -- Very different from, say, the Red River valley, which last I looked was not readily distinguishable from an inland sea!! And I can imagine what Devil's Lake is doing to wells in that area, being a salt lake and what with the way it's grown over the past few years. (I was hatched there :)

      Mineral contaminants can be anywhere -- a ways to the NE of me, a mountain well (which thereabouts is an exercise in futility anyway, lots of 500' dry holes) can hit a uranium deposit, which is probably not the best thing to drink. ;)

      BTW our local so-called soil (sand) tests out at ZERO nitrogen content. The person who did the testing thought her equipment was broken at first. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    54. Re:Sensationalism by Reziac · · Score: 1

      BTW thanks for the link -- good info. Interesting about using deep-rooted crops to scavenge nitrogen.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    55. Re:Sensationalism by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      the atomic number for gold appears to be 79 in almost all currently accepted measuring abilities, and theories.

      Water appears to be comprised of 2 atoms of hydrogen and 1 atom of oxygen in most all accepting test cases.

      These will be as much truth as they can be until they are not.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    56. Re:Sensationalism by Omestes · · Score: 1

      the atomic number for gold appears to be 79 in almost all currently accepted measuring abilities, and theories.

      I accept your "appears to be caveat", though I think in many cases I think adding it doesn't really mean much. If a measure has been repeated enough, by enough people, by enough methods, the value "appears to be" adds to this observation is practically nothing. This is the joy of inductive reasoning, there always will be doubt, but we can lower that level of doubt to near infinitesimal values.

      When I say gold has an atomic number of 79, this is as close to a fact as one can get (outside of math).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    57. Re:Sensationalism by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      No. I am allergic to cats.

  3. Study funded by? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Kohler? Seems kind of wasteful to say "through it away" rather than clean it...

    1. Re:Study funded by? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Silence! You will not be permitted to countermand American business interests with logic!

  4. Cleaning helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why you clean them eh?

  5. Who would have guessed? by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess a couple of co-workers are actually just taking good care of their health. I'm pretty sure one of them doesn't come anywhere near this bacterium more than twice a year.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Who would have guessed? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      And if the bacterium accidentally finds itself on the aforementioned co-workers' skin, they wouldn't be able to establish a beachhead against the aggressive pre-existing community already there.

      We're all microbiomes; some of us are just more... lush.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Who would have guessed? by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      We're all microbiomes; some of us are just more... lush.

      I had a very lush flatmate once.... very very lush.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  6. Secretly, some geeks knew... by arhhook · · Score: 3, Funny

    Secretly, some geeks knew this all along, hiding from the masses the real reasons they didn't shower. Now their cover is blown!

    1. Re:Secretly, some geeks knew... by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Well, RMS tried to let us know with his Free (from) Showers Foundation (FSF).

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    2. Re:Secretly, some geeks knew... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Protip: If you have to explain the joke in parentheses, it wasn't funny.

    3. Re:Secretly, some geeks knew... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Protip: If you have to explain the joke (in parentheses), it wasn't funny.

      FTFY

  7. oh great by sxedog · · Score: 4, Funny

    now there will be more smelly IT nerds walking around. Wait.... nevermind

    --
    If it ain't broke, DON'T fix it.
  8. Gentlemen, start your start-ups by StarKruzr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Creation of showerhead disinfection industry in 3...2...1...

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by BeardedChimp · · Score: 4, Funny

      The telcos are way ahead in this field, they've had telephone sanitisers for years.

    2. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Creation of showerhead disinfection industry in 3...2...1...

      Umm, it's called Clorox.

    3. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      The telcos are way ahead in this field, they've had telephone sanitisers for years.

      Note to self: Better get started on that B Ark... So when's the giant space goat coming to eat us again?

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    4. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creation of showerhead disinfection industry in 3...2...1...

      Umm, it's called Clorox.

      Better use some ammonia too... just to be safe. :-)

    5. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Adriax · · Score: 1

      I guarantee that within a couple months you'll start seeing showerheads in stores with automated injectors that spray alcohol through the nozzels after every shower (of course with an overpriced disposable hand sanitizer cartridge).

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    6. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      A cup (big enough for the shower head to fit in) full of bleach should do the trick. Fill cup with bleach, submerse shower head in cup. If you can take the shower head off it might be easier then holding the cup to the shower head. Wait a little while with the shower head in the bleach. No more stuff in shower head*.

      * this also might harm the shower head. Some metals do not like bleach.

    7. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by ari_j · · Score: 1

      And it's a good thing they do! I was just this morning talking to my hairdresser about the chances of a pandemic being started by an improperly sanitized telephone handset when someone--either an insurance salesman or a tired television producer, I couldn't tell which--at the next booth spoke up about actuarial tables and fall ratings.

    8. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Also your eyes. One more step is needed; rinse the shower head with water afterward.

      --
      Interesting.
    9. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by PayPaI · · Score: 3, Funny

      spray alcohol through the nozzels after every shower

      Forget after, how about during?

    10. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by operagost · · Score: 1

      Rinsing a showerhead with water? Sounds inconvenient! Forget the whole thing!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by spamking · · Score: 1

      A self-cleaning shower head . . . oh the irony.

    12. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Mixing bleach and ammonia creates chlorine gas. In all likelihood, if you clean with one after the other, so only a few drops of one remain to react with the other, you'll only do a small amount of damage (though repeated exposure will cause progressively worsening effects). If you actually mix them in any serious quantities, particularly in a poorly ventilated space, you will gas yourself and you will die. So please don't mix bleach and ammonia, for cleaning purposes or anything else.

      That said, the reactive properties of bleach and ammonia make bleaching one of the few ways of effectively removing the smell of cat urine from clothing, towels, etc. I've got a few towels at home that could not be used if I didn't bleach them to remove the cat urine odor (repeated non-bleach washings did little to nothing). Of course, they were originally blue, and now have large patches of pink due to the bleach, but I'm not picky about the appearance of my towels. :-)

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    13. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      I meant to include a note at the top of that post that it was "just in case" someone was stupid enough to try it. Slashdot dropped the first paragraph though. Weird.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    14. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Chlorine gas can kill you, no doubt, but the only mention I found of anyone actually dying from mixing chlorine and bleach was a person with an undiagnosed, rare form of brain cancer. I don't think

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by residieu · · Score: 1

      Actually with anti-bacterial products everywhere, I wouldn't be surprised if they started injecting the anti-bacterial agent during the shower. Can't trust that soap to get you clean, better drown you in purell so you can escape those nasty evil germs that will KILL you.

    16. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      That should be ammonia and bleach, of course.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    17. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are we supposed to clean the gene pool if the uneducated are warned?

      I suppose I should warn of an explosion risk as well if you clean your toilet with "The Works" and lye?

      Yes, I am the one who posted the ammonia comment, and no, I do not actually support killing off people in this way (though I wouldn't be screaming for new language on packaging if someone earned their Darwin Award in this way)

    18. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, but they all got put on Ark C

    19. Re:Gentlemen, start your start-ups by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Nope. You will start seeing disposable shower heads. Cause we don't throw enough in landfill now.
      And it will be "cheaper" to just make more shower heads and throw them away.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  9. Ahh sweet vindication by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally the medical community is backing my position on showers ... and I know it's just a matter of time before some new study proves I'm right about the Doritos and climbing the basement stairs.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    1. Re:Ahh sweet vindication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new study today found that eating two large bags of Doritos a day helps fight off bacteria found in showerheads.

    2. Re:Ahh sweet vindication by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      A new study today found that eating two large bags of Doritos a day increases the profits of Frito-Lay.

    3. Re:Ahh sweet vindication by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      A new study today found that eating two large bags of Doritos a day increases the profits of Frito-Lay. Burma Shave. -- We do not repeat gossip, so listen carefully.

  10. hmmm by Rip+Dick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know most people, myself included, run the water for a minute or two before stepping into the shower. (Due to the time it takes for the water to heat up, etc.) Would this help avoid getting sprayed with a build up of bacteria or is the stream of germs constant? Also, hot water + soap + friction can kill a lot of germs, wouldn't the fact that you're already showering help the situation?

    1. Re:hmmm by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, hot water + soap + friction can kill a lot of germs, wouldn't the fact that you're already showering help the situation?

      That doesn't kill germs. It just helps remove them from your skin.

      Besides the concern for pulmonary disease is that you inhale water droplets with these germs inside them. I highly doubt that you use soap + hot water + friction inside your lungs (but if you do, you're more of a man than I).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:hmmm by mea37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the (somewhat incomplete) information in TFA, I think you're right that running the water before stepping in helps. Not sure about whether the fact you're taking a shower at the time matters, as the concern is inhaled bacteria.

      It also seems that metal shower heads are not as bad as plastic.

      Oh, and the bacteria in question are opportunistic - healthy people rarely get sick from them. So maybe it makes sense to give small children more baths than showers (which is what my family always did when I was growing up anyway); to consider taking baths when sick; and to consider what this implies for care of the elderly.

      Other than that, this just seems a bit over-hyped. (Not seeing what the comparison to TB adds to the story beyond sensationalism, for example.)

    3. Re:hmmm by geekoid · · Score: 1

      err, not always :
      "Showers have also been identified as a route for spreading other infectious diseases, including a type of pneumonia called Legionnaires' disease and chest infections with a bacterium called Pseudomonas aeruginosa."

      However the headline should be:

      "Showering with dirty shower heads may be bad for your health."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:hmmm by slimshady945 · · Score: 1

      They can also infect by being swallowed, so don't drink the shower water, or maybe even brush your teeth with it.

    5. Re:hmmm by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Probably removing and dipping the shower head in some bleach every now and then will also help.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:hmmm by furby076 · · Score: 1

      If the water were hot enough to kill the germs you would be screaming like Jamie "The Scream Queen" Lee Curtis. Then you would be hospitalized.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    7. Re:hmmm by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 1

      (Not seeing what the comparison to TB adds to the story beyond sensationalism, for example.)

      Mycobacterium avium is a cousin of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . They have similar biological properties, and are treated with the same manners of long-course antibiotics. The former causes tuberculosis, and the latter (in humans) causes the almost sexily-named "hot tub lung". Fun!

    8. Re:hmmm by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 1

      Probably removing and dipping the shower head in some bleach every now and then will also help.

      Chlorine is not recommended. From the original paper:

      In one case a Denver Metro showerhead sampled on three occasions, attempted cleaning with bleach solution resulted in a 3-fold increase in the load of M. gordonae, from approximately 25% of the assemblage sequences initially (BSK1Q) to 72% and 74% subsequently (BSK2Q and BSK3Q). Although anecdotal, this observation is interesting in light of the general resistance of mycobacteria to chlorine, which also may be one reason for the mycobacterial enrichment in municipal systems compared to well-water fed systems (discussed below).

    9. Re:hmmm by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I highly doubt that you use soap + hot water + friction inside your lungs (but if you do, you're more of a man than I).

      Weed kills these bugs and prevents lung cancer. I read it on www.good-skunk-is-a-humanright.co.uk

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:hmmm by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      OK then, I should be more than protected...

    11. Re:hmmm by radtea · · Score: 1

      Would this help avoid getting sprayed with a build up of bacteria or is the stream of germs constant?

      Maybe you could explain first why you are worried about that?

      The actual empirical evidence is that there is a biofilm of this bug on 30% of showers tested (no demographic info given in TFA so no way of knowing what they were actually testing.) They did not, as I read it, actually measure any bacteria being sprayed out, and "It just makes sense to me" that that would happen is not a particularly interesting or informative statement.

      This is a classic case of scientists measuring an input or source term and the press drawing wildly unsupported conclusions about the output or result, which they then carefully hedge in the last line of the article, saying there is no evidence that this source term actually causes any infections.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    12. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally do think that modern society is a little overboard on sanitation in many regards (OMFG the germz iz coming to getz meh! quick, haz-mat suits and gas masks for te kidz!)

      But this is just a stupid headline. If you're that worried about it, maybe you should just wash the damn showerhead once in a while. Get a detachable one that you can soak in a bucket. Better yet, just install a copper head which is naturally resistant to most bacteria.

      I'm sure the negative effects of never bathing or practicing personal hygiene will quickly outweigh any advantagous you gain from avoiding this critter.

    13. Re:hmmm by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      A good point but... also... dipping in bleach is not quite the same as letting the chlorine in the municipal water take care of it. The chlorine in the water supply isn't going to turn your clothing white, and it wont burn your eyes either. Yet, a drop of household bleach in your eye, and you are going to be in a world of hurt.

      So while it looks like this bacteria is chlorine resistant, that doesn't mean its going to survive a good bleaching. Could use alcohol too, but remember... alcohol requires around 10 minutes of contact to kill most things (I was just reading a lysol can for other reasons... apparently alcohol is its major "active ingredient"... and gives appropriate time of contact to kill various germs)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    14. Re:hmmm by Rip+Dick · · Score: 1

      You got me. I'm actually a sales rep for whirlpool spas and tubs. I thought a little FUD on /. would help drum up some business. Unfortunately you were too smart for my evil plans. Blast. I would have gotten away with it, too...

    15. Re:hmmm by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Occurs to me that it's probably not the dosage or the environment so much as that the shower does a good job of turning the water and *anything* it carries into a nice inhalable aeresol, perfect for pulling deep into your lungs.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:hmmm by jeffliott · · Score: 1

      the bacteria in question are opportunistic - healthy people rarely get sick from them.

      Are there bacteria that aren't opportunistic, and change their mind's once they show up and see the host already totally screwed?

    17. Re:hmmm by clem · · Score: 1

      Soap and water in the lungs? No, sir. That's what the wire bottle brush is for.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    18. Re:hmmm by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I guess you don't know what "opportunistic" means in this context.

      Opportunistic infections are those that will usually not strike a healthy person. If you look at it from the perspective of the bacterium (or virus, or whatever), then it might be better described as "ineffective"; but if you look at it in terms of human social impact, "opportunistic" describes it pretty well.

    19. Re:hmmm by jeffliott · · Score: 1

      whoosh!

    20. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't say how hard the pursued this line of reasoning, but they seem to suggest that the bacteria is increasing respiratory illnesses by entering the lungs in inhaled microdroplets of water. So that you're washing your exterior won't help in this scenario.

    21. Re:hmmm by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure.

    22. Re:hmmm by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      That doesn't kill germs. It just helps remove them from your skin.

      AFAIK, plain old soap disrupts cellular membranes and basically causes many bacteria to fall apart, since it messes with surface tension.

    23. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baths are disgusting.
      Showers are disgusting.

      The only good option left are sponge baths.
      Given by nurses.
      Hot nurses.

    24. Re:hmmm by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "That doesn't kill germs. It just helps remove them from your skin."

      Bullshit. Soap has a mechanical action that causes cell membrane rupture in sufficient concentrations. Remember, friends, if you can't kill it any other way, homeostatic disruption will do the fucking job when the 'experts' chemicals won't!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:hmmm by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      the concern for pulmonary disease is that you inhale water droplets with these germs inside them.

      The concern of whom? My only concern would be that my immune system is not equipped to deal with them.

      Put crudely and stealing from George Carlin, the people who swim in sewage never get sick.... the others do, and they lead pathetic lifes on top of that, as if to add insult to injury.

    26. Re:hmmm by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay.
      Allow to dry.
      Expose to UV.
      Soak in H2O2,
      Soak in Bleach.
      Bake at 450 for one hour.
      And expose to hard Gamma.
      There if anything lives through all that then it deserves to kill you.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  11. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living in a house is bad for your health! A dirty house can spread all sorts of deadly bacterium.
    Cooking in a kitchen is bad for your health! A dirty kitchen can be a breeding ground for deadly bacterium.
    Your hands are bad for your health! Dirty hands can be a breeding ground for deadly bacterium.

    Yes dirty things are breeding grounds for stuff that kills you. No one is surprised.
    -Worst Headline Ever.

  12. Now what? by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

    So showers are unhealthy, and I'm sure laying around in a tub full of dirty water taking a bath is unhealthy, so what's left, a sponge bath?

    1. Re:Now what? by joaommp · · Score: 5, Funny

      sponge baths, given by sexy barely legal nurses in underwear, now that's healthy, in more than one sense of the word.

    2. Re:Now what? by justthisdude · · Score: 1

      Next they will be saying that sonic showers cause tinnitus...

      --
      "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
    3. Re:Now what? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

      sponges are also full of germs. better stick to a good hand-rubbing. ;-)

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    4. Re:Now what? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I also don't see the technical difference in breeding grounds between the shower head and the faucet...

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    5. Re:Now what? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Most of us use clean water in the tub.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Now what? by joaommp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Damn, you're good. Why did you have to "outpost" me? I wish I'd thought of that before.

    7. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sponge baths, given by sexy barely legal nurses in underwear, now that's healthy, in more than one sense of the word.

      sauce pls

    8. Re:Now what? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I took your advice, and my wife found out, my condition would be pretty far from "healthy"

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? can you repeat that?

    10. Re:Now what? by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is some health care reform I would vote for!

    11. Re:Now what? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      But will it be covered by insurance reform legislation? If so, I could support this kind of reform!

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    12. Re:Now what? by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      Duh, but it doesn't stay clean long does it?

    13. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought most Slashdotters did.

    14. Re:Now what? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Well that's what you get for not marrying a sexy barely legal nurse in underwear.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    15. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but the cold shower that you'll need afterwards will kill you.

  13. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tests revealed nearly a third of devices harbor significant levels of the critter."

    There, FTFY

    And I heard from a different source that you only need to worry if you are immunocompromised, i.e. AIDS and such.

    1. Re:FTFY by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I read you can get AIDs from dirty toilet seats. More than one in fact.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:FTFY by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      More than one AIDS or more than one toilet seat?

      You may have just some words there :P

      --
      Interesting.
    3. Re:FTFY by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      More than one AID.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  14. Thanks, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The average Slashdotter has to be physically threatened to make them wash in the first place, now you're giving them an excuse NOT to? Brilliant. OMFG the smell!

  15. Nothing to see here, move along... by CmdrPorno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Germs are EVERYWHERE. Hospitals do all kinds of disinfection that you wouldn't and couldn't do in your own home, and people still get staph infections.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      Germs are EVERYWHERE. Hospitals do all kinds of disinfection that you wouldn't and couldn't do in your own home, and people still get staph infections.

      While true there are germs everywhere, this is actually a tad more than nothing. First, this isn't a generic brand germ, it's a pretty well-known lung pathogen (a weakling cousin of TB, actually). Second, it seems to like forming biofilms inside shower heads, so the water that comes out has two orders of magnitude more critters than your average point in "everywhere".

    2. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Many hospital staph infections are due to the over-sanitation of surfaces. Bacteria will become largely immune to many disinfectants and become "super bugs"; additionally, it will latch onto the hosts due to it being a much more receptive surface than something which has been disinfected.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Informative

      Arguably people get staph infections in hospitals because hospitals put so much effort into sterilizing every little thing. It leaves the hardiest, and fastest spreading bacteria and viruses to fill the vacuum rather than the millions of common germs that our body knows how to deal with. They've done studies which show a less rigorous sterilization regiment can actually reduce the rate of infections but the whole 'germs are evil' mindset prevents hospitals from actually changing their behavior.

    4. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not because the hospitals are sterilizing. It's because people keep using antibiotics for things that are unnecessary that selects for antibiotic resistant bacteria such as MRSA. If and when vancomycin resistant Staph. becomes prevalent (I'm aware of 3 documented cases so far), we're in deep shit.

    5. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again we're betrayed by the collective will of idiots. Fuck this world.

    6. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not true. You're thinking of antibiotic resistance. Disinfectants usually physically break apart the bacteria and the common methods of antibiotic resistance don't protect against this. The main cause of staph infections is by people not washing their hands.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    7. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Staff infections.

    8. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "hospitals put so much effort into sterilizing every little thing."

      Well if they stop doing that, how can they justify $50 bedpans, $50 toothbrushes, $50 puke buckets, and so forth? If it's just something you can pick up at the dollar store, then insurance companies will insist that is where the hospitals source them from.

      It's far more profitable to go through the motions and appear to be safe, even though we're making humanity more fragile and the germs stronger in the process.

      And another thing (related): why do some people go to the hospital for every little sniffle or tummy ache or other trivial illness (like a mild flu such as the H1N1 virus) and insist on antibiotics? Getting sick actually makes the immune system stronger over the long term (along with eating well, getting exercise, etc) because the body builds up more varied and versatile antibodies. If we keep shielding ourselves from colds, the flu, etc. eventually there will be a black plague-like outbreak because our immune systems won't "know" how to fight off infections.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      False. Not just false, it's nonsense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People get staph from not having a proper policy on hand washing. Namely one the allows anyone in the hospital to call out anyone else at the hospital without fear of backlash.

      So the Janitor could call out the head surgeon, and be rewarded for it. Those hospitals are the one with the lowest numbers of post surgical infections, including staph.

      W're always in deep shit fro some perspective. Frankly, we will overcome this problem just like we over came many others.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Disinfectants usually physically break apart the bacteria and the common methods of antibiotic resistance don't protect against this.

      Yes, but think of how terrible it will be if bacteria ever do develop resistance to those disinfectants. If bacteria become resistant to ethanol for example, our nation's beer and liquor supply could become contaminated. And if cruddy sci fi TV shows have taught me anything, using disinfectants which dry out or physically break up bacteria will only teach them to survive that, and they will then spread that resistance to other animals, such as velociraptors, creating super velociraptors. You'll try to blow them up, but they'll regenerate, like the broomsticks in Fantasia.

      Which is terrifying. I'm going to have to take the rest of the day off to prepare.

    12. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

      Every time someone mistakenly adds the t to sterilization regimen, I picture the US Cavalry riding at breakneck speeds toward me with giant alcohol swabs.

    13. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

      Your description of disinfectants is not really correct. Different disinfectants function in different ways. Anti-biotic resistance *does* form from use of anti-bacterial soap, crossing over to resistance against anti-biotics used in humans. The transfer is through plasmids, and can happen between very different "species"[1] of bacteria. (Information reproduced from discussion with a medical doctor that is doing research in this area.)

      I also doubt the grandparent: I don't think the cleaning is the cause of anti-biotic resistance in hospitals - it seems more likely to be from overuse of human antibiotics and just the chance to transfer to lots of hosts with weak immune systems. This is strengthened by the fact that anti-biotic resistance is more common in countries that have worse hygiene and in countries that have less restrictive use of antibiotics.

      [1] I use quotes around species because species of bacteria are defined fairly differently than species of animals and plants, and assuming they're regular species lead to confusion. Since bacteria reproduce by fission, species are defined purely by similarities of function.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    14. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Just so we're clear, the blame lies with the doctors. I can't fault non-biologists or non-medical personell for not knowing that viruses aren't affected by antibiotics. The doctors who risk creating a pandemic because it's easier than convincing some people pills won't make it work magically, those are the people who should honestly face criminal charges.

    15. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Informative

      If and when vancomycin resistant Staph. becomes prevalent (I'm aware of 3 documented cases so far), we're in deep shit.

      Note quite. There is still Linezolid and when that becomes less effective there are several other Oxazolidones in the drug pipeline. Of course Linezolid is crazy expensive right now, being as it is under patent protection, but that is actually a good thing because it discourages frivolous uses such as anti-bacterial hand soap or animal feed. A few thousand dollars is worthwhile if it saves a life, but not for non-life threatening uses.

    16. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      And another thing (related): why do some people go to the hospital for every little sniffle or tummy ache or other trivial illness (like a mild flu such as the H1N1 virus) and insist on antibiotics?

      Because people are idiots. Antibiotics won't help against flu (btw, what do you consider a 'severe flu'? H1N1 as a family can have very severe strains). Economic crisis, superbugs and pandemics, ozone depletion, climate change, warfare, strife, illiteracy... sigh. Why did we put people in charge?! If it were up to me... whoah boy, there would be a reckoning

      --
      Interesting.
    17. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by amohat · · Score: 1

      "Hospitals do all kinds of disinfection..."

      Let me fix that for you: "We hope that...Hospitals do all kinds of disinfection..."

      Just like we hope that airlines do all kinds of maintenance. But come on folks, all we need to do is shake a lil corruption out of the FAA to find out everyone's cutting corners. But ain't nobody watching! Guess we gotta hope the magical free hand protects us?

      By the way, have a safe flight and a speedy recovery!

    18. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "Frankly, we will overcome this problem just like we over came many others."

      People with resistant live on, while everyone else dies off.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    19. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The cure for AIDS will come when we learn to genetically engineer a virulent but non-life-threatening variety of the bug. Then the task will fall upon us all to spread the infection ;-)

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    20. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

      Arguably people get staph infections in hospitals because hospitals put so much effort into sterilizing every little thing. It leaves the hardiest, and fastest spreading bacteria and viruses to fill the vacuum rather than the millions of common germs that our body knows how to deal with.

      Actually, "hardiest" and "fastest-spreading" are generally mutually opposed. Most mutations to develop antibiotic resistance are costly and inefficient compared to non-resistance. This is why these traits, which spontaneously appear in the population from time to time, do not become dominant without the use of antibiotics or other outside pressures to cull the herd in favor of resistance.

      However, you are right in some contexts. Some genes for resistance to antibiotics also aid in resistance to certain disinfectants.

      "Compounds such as household disinfectants and other antibacterial agents can also select for antibiotic resistance. Triclosan and pine oil, which are widely used in home cleaning products are able to select for multidrug-resistant mutants, either by mutation in the target genes or in the regulatory mar system, providing a pleiotropic resistance to disinfectants, multiple structurally unrelated antibiotics, organic solvents and oxidative stress agents. Constitutive expression of an MDR efflux pump which confers resistance to triclosan is also reported in P. aeruginosa. Given the increased use of these agents in households, one can imagine dramatic changes in the environmental flora that impact antibiotic resistance."

      -- TM Barbosa, SB Levy. The impact of antibiotic use on resistance development and persistence. Drug Resist Update. 2000;3:303-11.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    21. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Hospitals do all kinds of disinfection that you wouldn't and couldn't do in your own home, and people still get staph infections."

      They also ignore and omit proper precautions, even those as basic as a physician washing his hands between touching patients.

      We lose more people to MRSA in the US than we do to murder and the WoT, but it doesn't make much news for some reason...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    22. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In fact, this showcases why it is that little R&D takes place for antibiotics - there isn't much money in them, and when you do come out with one you need to charge obscene rates to make a profit.

      The fact is that 95% of people who get bacterial infections will do just fine with pennicilian. 95% of the rest will do just fine with one of a few other super-cheap antibiotics. The only people who need the really exotic stuff are people with really exotic problems. However, there aren't enough of them to pay for making new exotic stuff.

      I think that antibiotics are one of those areas where the NIH should probably just contract the development of new classes of treatments. They could place an order for a new drug just like the Air Force places an order for a new plane. Sure, it would be pricey, but it is probably the only way it will happen. Actually - it probably shouldn't even be the NIH, but rather a coalition of first-world governments. The government might license it royalty free to anybody who paid in to the development, and to third world nations.

    23. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      If anyone should face charges, it's the farmers who feed their pigs huge doses of antibiotics not because they are ill, but because they grow faster then.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    24. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Hospitals also face quite a different challenge from you in your own home, since there's a huge traffic of ill, old and immunocompromised people in and out all the time.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    25. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the plot for a movie. Possibly a porn movie, but nonetheless.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    26. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There was recent research by, I think US Army medical, about hospital infections. They found that cleaning is just not done well. A hospital bed rail was likely to have something like 1000x the number of bacteria colonies as would fail a deli slicer by a health inspector.

      They didn't expect humans to improve - they're advocating replacing stainless-steel everywhere in hospitals with copper.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    27. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Sure, them too.

    28. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      But... how long have we been taking showers? Assuming that this isn't some emerging phenomena, this has been happening as long as we've been showering, and assuming this, why are we still mostly alive as a species? The important information here, this isn't contained in TFA, is how many cases of infection have been reported that can be sourced back to a shower?

      Without that bit of information, this is completely meaningless. It is nothing more than silly sensationalist science-based FUD.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    29. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by dkf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but think of how terrible it will be if bacteria ever do develop resistance to those disinfectants.

      Terrible, but unlikely. Disinfectants are very powerful substances and/or processes. It'd be a bit like you developing cellular immunity to being chopped apart with a chainsaw.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    30. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by shermo · · Score: 1

      We lose more people to MRSA in the US than we do to murder and the WoT

      Wheel of Time? I know those books take a long time to finish. Is it like the people who die from playing computer games for 72 hours straight?

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    31. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      In fact you are totally wrong. Turns out multi-resistant bacteria trail the introduction of said bacteria into Ag use. So giving systemic anti-biotics to cattle for a 5% weight gain is the problem.

    32. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by barath_s · · Score: 1

      By getting sick people with a variety of germs to come out of the house and mix with others at the hospital (and by opening up their guts etc), they are actually inviting the germs in make things worse. The hospitals need all that disinfection just to avoid having made things worse from a bacteriological perspective. and even then they fail. There is some research that earlier practices involving midwives attending pregnant women at birth is better than having them come to the hospital. OTOH, bubonic plague spread less when it killed all the people in the village. Give me your sick, your germs yearning to break free ....

    33. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "While true there are germs everywhere, this is actually a tad more than nothing."

      Umm, what? Let's see. We've been using showers since 300 B.C. Someone's drinking way too much kool-aid. Think it's time to cut you off. This is sensationalist BS that's being brought up to scare people into buying more things to stay 'safe' when in reality it's just a marketing tactic to force purchases through catering to the survival 'instinct' of stupid people.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    34. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      We have the answer to HIV/AIDS.

      Descendants of those who contracted and survived the Black Plague and reproduced after contracting and surviving the disease.

      Our marrow as been transplanted into two patients so far and they're pretty much infection free - the virus can't attach itself to our cells.

      Oh, hey, here's the slashdot story! http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/09/1558241&from=rss

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    35. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Antibiotics will help against severe flu, and are commonly prescribed for it. While the flu virus does kill quite a lot of people, more are killed or suffer from severe complications as a result of secondary bacterial infections that are able to take hold due to the damage the influenza virus has done to the immune system. Saying antibiotics can't help against flu is like saying that they can't help against HIV. It's technically true, but highly misleading.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    36. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as a note: 95% of you might get along just fine with penicillin, but there are some of us that are deathly allergic to the stuff. In fact, I'm not allowed to be sick or have any pain, being allergic to penicillin, codeine and tetracycline. So, for those of you that penicillin cures most things - bully. For me, I need to have some of those expensive niche drugs, every time I get a bacterial infection.

      Good thing I'm a techy nerd, don't have the opportunity for personal interaction that would lead to getting all those nasty bacterial infections anyway.

      NC

    37. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup. You just hit on my pet peeve with all those folks who complain about "me too" drugs. There are many who think that most drugs are a waste of money since they don't treat new conditions. Who needs Crestor when you already have Zocor?

      Well, if you happen to have an allergy or other reaction to Zocor, maybe you'd be happy that companies didn't quit after just one. Plus, the competition helps keep down prices.

      The biggest problem with the healthcare industry is that it is far too dependent on statistical means. We treat everybody as an average, and on average everybody does well. Of course, lots of people fall through the cracks. Treatment would be far more effective if we could determine who reacts to what treatment best and tailor accordingly.

  16. paranoia by jihiggs · · Score: 1

    by this study, one could also conclude that this same bacteria would grow in the head of one of those acrobatic water things on the kitchen sink, and the hose extension to the kitchen sink. I use both regularly and ingest a significant ammount of the water from those devices. I should have a lot of health problems if this were really a problem.

    1. Re:paranoia by Starcub · · Score: 1

      Stationary water = prone to problems. I was taught as a youngster to turn on the faucet and wait 15 seconds before drinking. Nowadays, I drink mostly bottled water. Local and eviro-friendly packaging if possible/affordable.

    2. Re:paranoia by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In defense of the article, it's not imbibing these germs, it's inhaling them. The force of the water coming out spreads the bugs around getting them into the air which you breathe in. I'd wager, without bothering to look it up, that either HCl is not a plesent environment for these or they just can't attach to anything in the digestive system as opposed to the resporatory system.

    3. Re:paranoia by jihiggs · · Score: 1

      ah, that does make sense.

    4. Re:paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stationary water = prone to problems. I was taught as a youngster to turn on the faucet and wait 15 seconds before drinking. Nowadays, I drink mostly bottled water.

      Bottled water is as stationary as it gets.

      Am I to assume you dump the water from the bottle for 15 seconds before drinking?

    5. Re:paranoia by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      That was more about lead poisoning from the tin-lead solder joints. Bottled water has it's own problems. It's basically city tap water or well water, filtered, in a bottle. Which means you have all the same problems you could have at home combine that they run the equipment with almost zero regulation other than the content of the water put in the bottle (and not the content after it's sat on a shelf 3 months) Also, the bottles aren't thick enough (like glass ones) to make the water "sanitary" and the stored water can easily absorb gaseous toxins from where ever it's stored (i.e. on a shipper's truck loading dock exposed to diesel fumes/exhaust all day).

    6. Re:paranoia by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Plus it's a complete waste of resources.

      --
      Interesting.
  17. So the cure is... by Theodore · · Score: 0

    DON'T TURN THE DAMNED THING ON RIGHT IN YOUR FACE!
    (well, that and spending an extra $5 for a metal showerhead).

    Seriously, who does that anyway?
    You have to get the temperature right first, flip the switch, THEN you can get in the shower.

    1. Re:So the cure is... by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      What about communal push-button showers in the gym/swimming pool changing room, then?

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    2. Re:So the cure is... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      don't be the first to use it on any given day.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:So the cure is... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      dont drop the soap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stallman will live forever!

  19. shower vs. immersion baths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might consider an Immersion bath if the blasted tub wasn't so dang small I mean come on how the heck am I, at 6feet and 4 inches tall, supposed to get my body into a 5 foot tub.

    1. Re:shower vs. immersion baths by furby076 · · Score: 1

      I might consider an Immersion bath if the blasted tub wasn't so dang small I mean come on how the heck am I, at 6feet and 4 inches tall, supposed to get my body into a 5 foot tub.

      Bend your legs. What you really meant to say "I mean come on how the heck am I, at 350 lbs of fat, supposed to get my body into a 2.5 foot wide tub"

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    2. Re:shower vs. immersion baths by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Or at 500 lbs (assuming 150 lbs of non-fat and 350 lbs of fat).

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  20. bathing by fran6gagne · · Score: 1

    I guess bathing in your own dirt, germs and whatever else that crawl in your bath is better... Soon we'll have to dry clean ourselve to avoid all the shit they find everyday.

  21. Safe by clemdoc · · Score: 1

    No shower in my basement.

  22. is it really a problem... by fataugie · · Score: 1

    For geeks in general?

    Not from where I sit (downwind).

    --

    WTF? Over?

  23. Title is misleading... by joocemann · · Score: 1

    I read this blog yesterday on physorg.com and I can tell you straight up that the title here on slashdot is very misleading.

    It sounds a little too exaggerated.

  24. Bad water... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The poster presented this as true everywhere, at least deceptively implied it is so. The reality is this is only going to be true where the water isn't properly sanitized, in the US the clean water act requires cities, counties and water authorities to insure the water is properly sanitized before delivery. Most US systems are designed to have residual chlorine all the way to delivery (if you are worried about it let the water sit for 5 min before you drink it and the minimal chlorine will leach out of the water, or you can have an in home filtration system that will strip the chlorine before delivery to the drinking taps).

    The only place this bacteria could grow in shower heads would be countries that don't require that the potable water be properly sterilized at delivery. That doesn't include the US and I doubt it includes any European country or Japan or any developed country for that mater that has clean water rules.

    1. Re:Bad water... by maxume · · Score: 1

      My water comes straight from a well right here by my house. There is minimal filtration, and no treatment, and I happen to be in the United States (the minimum filtration I am referring to is the screen I am guessing the well has, and the aerators on the various faucets...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Bad water... by default+luser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true, this is an opportunistic bacteria that lives in stagnant water. It can find the stagnant water without being introduced through the water supply (through air or other contamination). Since a person with dirty hair is only inches away from the shower, it's not hard to see how it might get contaminated. In the same way it can get inside your lungs (aerosol), it can also get inside your shower head.

      The shower head is sitting idle most of the day, and since the chlorine in the water quickly dissipates in air, the water left remaining when you turn the shower off is quite welcoming to the bug. Yeah, it gets hit with chlorinated water at least once a day (you do shower regularly, right?), but the amount of chlorine in the water at-delivery is way too little to kill entrenched bacteria (that happens at the treatment plant, with much higher concentrations of chlorine, and UV treatments). You might kill a small amount, but the strong survive.

      This is a real problem - it's already known that sources of stagnant water can be breeding grounds for Legionnaire's Disease, so why not yet-another lung infection?

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    3. Re:Bad water... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I know that in some places in the US, they've only recently gotten water chlorination systems hooked up to the mains. Additionally, a lot of places (largely rural ones) still utilize wells for their water, so there will be no chlorination. I'd not be surprised if as much as 1/3rd of the households out there are in remote/non-mains water.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Bad water... by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the shower is run once a day the residual chlorine would sterilize any colony before it could establish. If the shower isn't run once a day and properly drains the environment won't remain wet enough long enough for the colony to establish. The only time a colony could establish such that the residual wouldn't kill it is if the shower isn't used daily and doesn't drain properly. Even then I doubt it could effectively establish because the amount of food in the water for the bacteria is going to be near zero, at least for properly treated water. The BOD (Biologic Oxygen Demand) requirements for potable water are very very low in the US. Only the water systems that are the worst of the worst (no residual chlorine, high BOD) in the US would even have the possibility and then you need a bad shower head and infrequent showering to make this happen. The probability is very low IMO.

    5. Re:Bad water... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As more cities move to chloramine, it is no longer true that letting the water age will remove the chlorine. And even with regular chlorine, it takes more than 5 minutes.

    6. Re:Bad water... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I specifically mentioned potable water delivery systems for a reason. Well water is a separate game with each well user responsible for sterilization and filtration. Although most well water is highly sterile (after all the water has passed through a natural gravel filter that is multiple miles in length), IMO the bacterial risk is generally very low, the problem with well water is usually the heavy metals the user isn't aware are there. The chemical contamination risks usually far outweigh biological risks when dealing with well water, particularly because most well water users don't test their water regularly to verify chemical makeup.

    7. Re:Bad water... by coffegrl · · Score: 1

      If only that were true. The study sampled water in several western states right here in the US and found this bacteria in many of the sample sites. While this bacteria is not particularly harmful to most folks, it really can wreck havoc in the lungs of people with CF, COPD and other pulmonary diseases.

    8. Re:Bad water... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is on city water. Where I live there are thousands of households, including ours, that have our own wells. I think around here the number of houses on wells probably exceeds those on mains water.

    9. Re:Bad water... by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 1

      I can see that you didn't read TFA. Read it now. I'll wait.

      Done yet? Good. Now you know that the study took place in 45 locations in (wait for it) the United States, that it focused mainly on metropolitan areas with chlorinated water sources, and that the issue was likely exacerbated, and certainly not eliminated, by chlorination.

      Yes, reading really is fundamental.

    10. Re:Bad water... by osvenskan · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...this is only going to be true where the water isn't properly sanitized. Most US systems are designed to have residual chlorine all the way to delivery...

      The NY Times version of the same article says, "[Mycobacterium] avium tends to be a particular problem in municipal water supplies, Dr. Pace said. The reason is that cities treat their water with chlorine, a poison that kills most bacteria but gives avium a selective advantage."

    11. Re:Bad water... by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      This is so many levels of incorrect I don't even know where to begin.

      Let's start with the Clean Water Act. There are numerous failures in compliance, and the EPA acknowledges they are vastly underfunded to provide proper enforcement. Depending on the state, there have been noncompliance rates of as high as 80%, e.g., Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The violators claim that many of these are bureaucratic in nature and don't actually represent a threat to the water supply, but to say that legal measures have adequately protected the US water supply is woefully ignorant of the facts.

      Second, "residual chlorine" does not "leach" out of the water. Chlorine does not just magically disappear out of aqueous solution; the atoms are still there--indeed they must be in order for chlorination to be effective!--unless you have found some way to evolve a gas that will bubble out of the water. Leaching refers to the release of a substance out of a solution over time. Once you put chlorine into water, it forms hypochlorite (the same ion found in household bleach), which is the disinfecting agent.

      Third, the study already amply documents the growth of the aforementioned bacteria inside the shower head. There is a small amount of standing water that remains in the head; exposure to air then permits the bacteria to grow--even in the presence of any small concentration of chlorine in the water. It doesn't take much for a colony to overpower a little bit of chlorine.

      Fourth, there are many species of bacteria that are well adapted to surviving in what we would consider highly toxic environments. It should not come as a surprise that there should exist bacteria that are simultaneously (a) able to flourish in a (poorly-maintained) shower head attached to a municipal water supply, and (b) pathogenic in nature.

      Finally, all it takes is to get an all-metal shower head where you can easily detach the nozzle assembly. They sell them at the hardware store--I should know, I bought one recently (my old shower broke). Once a month, you unscrew the nozzle portion, and clean it out. If your water is really crazy hard like mine (seriously wtf, it's got more calcium than milk), you pretty much need to do this anyway because the nozzles get clogged if you don't. But don't buy cheapo plastic shower heads because (1) they break easily, and (2) they seem to clog faster because the nozzles tend to be finer.

    12. Re:Bad water... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      So why not just occasionally dip the whole shower head in undiluted bleach? That will kill almost all viruses, and most if not all bacteria. Of course it'll tend to eat the shower head too, but it's probably more replaceable than you are. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Bad water... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See comment thread above.
      This bacteria is chlorine-resistant.

    14. Re:Bad water... by gregmac · · Score: 1

      The article specifically states they sampled water in shower heads in cities in the US (New York and Denver pointed out as examples), and found 30% of them contained the bacteria.

      Frankly, I'm surprised as well that they can survive the chlorine mandated to be in drinking water, but apparently they do.

      --
      Speak before you think
    15. Re:Bad water... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      If the shower is run once a day the residual chlorine would sterilize any colony before it could establish. If the shower isn't run once a day and properly drains the environment won't remain wet enough long enough for the colony to establish. The only time a colony could establish such that the residual wouldn't kill it is if the shower isn't used daily and doesn't drain properly. Even then I doubt it could effectively establish because the amount of food in the water for the bacteria is going to be near zero, at least for properly treated water. The BOD (Biologic Oxygen Demand) requirements for potable water are very very low in the US. Only the water systems that are the worst of the worst (no residual chlorine, high BOD) in the US would even have the possibility and then you need a bad shower head and infrequent showering to make this happen. The probability is very low IMO.

      As a post that's currently modded to +5 up above states, this bacteria doesn't really mind chlorine in its environment. As the other response to your post states, 30% of shower heads in the US have this bacteria.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    16. Re:Bad water... by Nithendil · · Score: 1

      Except mycobacteria are resistant to chlorine.

    17. Re:Bad water... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Chlorine does not just magically disappear out of aqueous solution; the atoms are still there"

      Someone's never worked in the pool business. Chlorine will disappear without thinking about it. Read the MSDS for Chlorine, nah wait I'll do it for you:

      Chlorine is 99.5% volatile with a melting point of negative one hundred and fifty fahrenheit and it boils at negative thirty fahrenheit - that means it just goes the fuck away when exposed to even mildly warm air, kinda like alcohol. It is also only slightly soluble in water.

      So, yes, chlorine does pretty much magically disappear.

      What you are thinking of is called Chloramine.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    18. Re:Bad water... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Seems like this would apply to any standing water: umbrella-handle shaped kitchen faucets, toilet bowls and tanks, the water sitting under an ice dispenser, flower vases, tea pots, soap dishes, and probably more.

  25. A solution? by ThoughtMonster · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be better if they provided some information on avoiding the potential infection apart from 'not showering'?

    Doesn't not showering harbor other kinds of health risks?

    1. Re:A solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for cthulu's sake, take the damn showerhead off and CLEAN it!

  26. Sounds like by jockeys · · Score: 1

    my shower head needs a shower.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  27. Yeah and... by Gusfm · · Score: 1

    ...not taking shower can be harmful to your social life ;)

  28. Dear Slashdotters by mewsenews · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article does NOT mean you have an excuse to cease bathing.

    This article also does not provide justification for the cessation of: tooth brushing, hair cutting, shaving, fingernail clipping, or deodorant usage.

    Regards,
    Society

    1. Re:Dear Slashdotters by kimvette · · Score: 4, Funny

      In order for many slashdotters to cease bathing, they would first have to start bathing.

      Sorry, I saw a nit and had to pick it! ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Dear Slashdotters by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I saw a nit and had to pick it! ;)

      Don't do that if you're not bathing.

      --
      Interesting.
    3. Re:Dear Slashdotters by Skapare · · Score: 1

      So you are saying I should just stick to my usual monthly ritual and I'll still be OK?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:Dear Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F-U you cleanliness Nazi!

  29. And the relevance to /.'ers is...??? by duh_lime · · Score: 1

    need I say more?

  30. Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have so many questions that this article doesn't answer.

    1) Where was the sample taken? UK showers? World wide? Third world countries?
    2) Is there an information on different kinds of shower heads? for example, is this more common on massaging heads, low flow/high pressure heads, etc?
    3) Does hot water kill this bacteria? Is it more common for people who take colder showers than people who take hot ones?
    4) I always start the shower first before getting under it, since it takes about 5+ seconds to warm up... any ideas if this affects infection? (Thats more of a study question than a question from the article).
    5) Any real way to prevent the growth? Someone already asked if CLR kills it. If this is so common, mind telling me how I can help myself?

    I've never read a BBC article that left me with more questions.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      At least in regards to your first question.

      "When the researchers swabbed and tested 50 shower heads from nine cities in seven different states in the US, including New York City and Denver, they found 30% of the devices posed a potential risk."

      FTA

      --
      Interesting.
    2. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      It only takes 5 seconds for your shower to warm up, damn mine takes 2-3 minutes.

    3. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have so many questions that this article doesn't answer.

      1) Where was the sample taken? UK showers? World wide? Third world countries? 2) Is there an information on different kinds of shower heads? for example, is this more common on massaging heads, low flow/high pressure heads, etc? 3) Does hot water kill this bacteria? Is it more common for people who take colder showers than people who take hot ones? 4) I always start the shower first before getting under it, since it takes about 5+ seconds to warm up... any ideas if this affects infection? (Thats more of a study question than a question from the article). 5) Any real way to prevent the growth? Someone already asked if CLR kills it. If this is so common, mind telling me how I can help myself?

      I've never read a BBC article that left me with more questions.

      The original article is here. TFA does answer a few of these, but some are not addressed.

      1. Where was the sample taken?: 45 different locations in five US states (NY, CO, ND, IL, TN)
      2. Is there an information on different kinds of shower heads?: No, but they did speculate that there may be a difference between plastic vs metal shower heads and well-water vs municipal-supplied water. Plastic tends to have more, and only municipal sources seemed to have the mycobacterial films (the sample size was too small to say for certain though).
      3. Does hot water kill this bacteria? Is it more common for people who take colder showers than people who take hot ones?: They didn't test the average temperature of the household members' showers, but hot water will kill most of the critters.
      4. I always start the shower first before getting under it...: Running the water at any temperature for a few minutes will wash most of the looser bugs out.
      5. Any real way to prevent the growth?: If you're immunosuppressed or have another condition that makes you susceptible to mycobacterial infection, you might want to use private well water and a metal showerhead, and run your water for a few minutes before showering.
    4. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by cratermoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pretty sure I read that this study was funded buy an industry group representing companies that, among other things, make shower heads and home plumbing fixtures. As for your 3rd question, "Does hot water kill this bacteria?", any water hot enough to kill bacteria would badly scald a person instantly.

    5. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the way 90% of news is, ultimately useless or irrelevant

    6. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      this is the way 90% of news is, ultimately useless or irrelevant

      90% of all statistics are erroneous.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    7. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by radtea · · Score: 1

      "When the researchers swabbed and tested 50 shower heads from nine cities in seven different states in the US, including New York City and Denver, they found 30% of the devices posed a potential risk."

      This still doesn't tell us what kind of showers they tested. Residential? Multi-unit or detached? Public showers at gyms?

      And a "potential risk" is logically equivalent to "possibly perfectly safe", so why doesn't the article say, "they found 30% of the devices were possibly perfectly safe"? Or why not say something meaningful, like, "they found 30% of the devices tested positive for this bacteria, and the risk of infection is completely unknown but obviously very small because the vast majority of the users of these showers did not get sick."

      Bacteria in showerheads is something that we'd obviously all like to avoid, but putting the health concern here as the lead element of the story is just misleading and dishonest, a clear attempt to sensationalize a decidedly unsensational fact that has been true for a long time with no significant increase in illness that can be traced back to it.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    8. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happily I happen to have some answers :P

      1) Where was the sample taken? UK showers? World wide? Third world countries?

      The BBC article states that "When the researchers swabbed and tested 50 shower heads from nine cities in seven different states in the US, including New York City and Denver...". So in other words this is a small study from the US.

      2) Is there an information on different kinds of shower heads? for example, is this more common on massaging heads, low flow/high pressure heads, etc?

      This question will probably be answered in a followup study, the current study is a bit small to be able to distinguish between they types of shower head used. The article does however say that plastic shower heads tend to have a higher bacterial load, so you may be better off with a metal shower head.

      3) Does hot water kill this bacteria? Is it more common for people who take colder showers than people who take hot ones?

      The study in question did not look at infection rates, but instead was looking for the presence of this bacteria in shower heads. It is not likely that the hot water from a tap will kill this bacteria, and the temperature will probably not make any difference (imho) to infection rates... but perhaps they will look at that in a followup study.

      4) I always start the shower first before getting under it, since it takes about 5+ seconds to warm up... any ideas if this affects infection? (Thats more of a study question than a question from the article).
      FTA "Lead researcher Professor Norman Pace, said: "If you are getting a face full of water when you first turn your shower on, that means you are probably getting a particularly high load of Mycobacterium avium, which may not be too healthy.""
      There are more bacteria being washed out of the shower head at the start than after a few seconds so waiting will reduce exposure.

      5) Any real way to prevent the growth? Someone already asked if CLR kills it. If this is so common, mind telling me how I can help myself?

      Any anti-microbial spray should deal with this bacterial growth in the shower head. There is probably no real way to deal with it permanently though... CLR is a limescale remover (as far as I can tell) & so will not really affect the biofilm (although removing limescale will probably help reduce the bacterial load)

      The best thing however is just not to worry about this too much. This is really just one of the many meaningless scare stories that modern news agencies seem to be unable to resist.

      hth

    9. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took and analyzed quite a few of the samples for this study while I was at CU as an undergraduate.

      I took the samples from my shower in an off campus residence, my friends showers and the local dorms.

      The samples were from all kinds of shower heads, most of the time you would open up the showerhead and find a pretty obvious biofilm that would be the first part of the sample...then take another swab around the rubber o-ring. There was never a big difference in bacterial growths except for the completely metal showerheads which had smaller biofilms.

    10. Re:Suprisingly light on details for the BBC by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't necessarily answer the question. I have an electric shower. When I turn it off, the pump stops immediately, but the heating elements take a while to cool. While this is happening, they are still heating the water that is touching them. If I turn the shower back on after a few seconds, painfully hot water comes out (I've never stayed under it for more than a few splashes, and have no intention of doing so). Then the overheat light comes on and the heater cuts out until the water temperature drops. Is this, for example, hot enough to kill the bacteria?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been saying this for years! Now excuse me, my mom is calling from upstairs.

  32. Did low flow kill my momma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom had a cough a few years back and a test came back indicative of a MAI infection. A different species of bacertia, but considered a part of the MAC complex.

    Was curious as the where she may have gotten it. Maybe the cats litter box? Talked with the doc and he said this stuff is everywhere, in the air, in the dirt, on the plants. We are basically constantly challenged by this stuff all our lives and it only becomes a problem when disease or age compromises our immune system.

    And he added needless to say, anything that aerosolizes this stuff is not so good, so we might want to look at the bathroom (where the litter box also happens to be). He mentioned the Lany Windermere syndrome and hot tub lung, so the idea that hot water and bad bacteria could lead to a steamy entry point of the lungs is well established.

    My own useless theory is that whole problem is the low-flow shower heads that are precisely designed to better aerosolize a spray of water with less physical flow. This along with the change to more plastic parts may have made things worse.

    Clearly, some further study and redesigns may be in order.

     

  33. This is why I only take baths by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    in a tub of Clorox. Pretty much guaranteed not to find any bacteria in there :P

  34. Are they extra healthy in France? by RPGonAS400 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Between red wine for the health of it and no showers no wonder the worlds oldest person in recent history was that 121 year old French woman.

  35. I just took a shower! by pikine · · Score: 1

    Then you tell me that?! *cough*

    --
    I once had a signature.
  36. This isn't an issue for me... by babywhiz · · Score: 1

    My shower head breaks every 4 months, and I have to replace it.....although TFA doesn't mention how long it takes for this bacteria to build up....

  37. A possible solution by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 1

    is an entirely new shower head design which incorporates a Venturi tube drawing from an antibacterial cleanser reservoir. Clean and decontaminate without having to store bottles / bars within the stall. As an added bonus, if you formulated the cleanser correctly it could also act as a hands-free shower stall cleaner.

  38. George Carlin said it best by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From 'You Are All Diseased':

    Where did this sudden fear of germs come from in this country? Have you noticed this? The media constantly running stories about all the latest infections? Salmonella, E-coli, hanta virus, bird flu, and Americans will panic easily so everybody's running around scrubbing this and spraying that and overcooking their food and repeatedly washing their hands, trying to avoid all contact with germs. It's ridiculous and it goes to ridiculous lengths.

    In prisons, before they give you lethal injection, they swab your arm with ALCOHOL. Wouldn't want some guy to go to hell AND be sick.Fear of germs, why these fuckin' pussies. You can't even get a decent hamburger anymore they cook the shit out of everything now 'cause everyone's afraid of FOOD POISONING! Hey, wheres you sense of adventure? Take a fuckin' chance will you? Hey you know how many people die of food poisoning in this country? Nine thousand, thats all, its a minor risk.

    Take a fuckin' chance bunch of goddamn pussies.Besides, what d'ya think you have an immune system for? It's for killing germs! But it needs practice, it needs germs to practice on. So if you kill all the germs around you, and live a completely sterile life, then when germs do come along, you're not gonna be prepared. And never mind ordinary germs, what are you gonna do when some super virus comes along that turns your vital organs into liquid shit?! I'll tell you what your gonna do ... you're gonna get sick. You're gonna die and your gonna deserve it because you're fucking weak and you got a fuckin' weak immune system!

    Let me tell you a true story about immunization ok. When I was a little boy in New York city in the nineteen-forties, we swam in the Hudson river. And it was filled with raw sewage! OK? We swam in raw sewage, you know, to cool off. And at that time the big fear was polio. Thousands of kids died from polio every year. But you know something? In my neighborhood no one ever got polio. No one! EVER! You know why? Cause WE SWAM IN RAW SEWAGE! It strengthened our immune system, the polio never had a prayer. We were tempered in raw shit!

    So personally I never take any precautions against germs. I don't shy away from people who sneeze and cough. I don't wipe off the telephone, I don't cover the toilet seat, and if I drop food on the floor I pick it up and eat it!Even if I'm at side walk cafe! IN CALCUTTA! THE POOR SECTION! ON NEW YEARS MORNING DURING A SOCCER RIOT! And you know something? In spite of all the so called "risky behavior ".... I never get infections. I don't get em. I don't get colds, I don't get flu, I don't get headaches, I don't get upset stomach, And you know why? Cause I got a good strong immune system! And it gets a lot of practice!

    My immune system is equipped with the biological equivalent of fully automatic military assault rifles, with night vision and laser scopes. And we have recently acquired phosphorous grenades, cluster bombs and anti personnel fragmentation mines.

    So, when my white blood cells are on patrol reconnoitering my blood stream seeking out strangers and other undesirables, and if they see any, ANY, suspicious looking germs of any kind, THEY DON'T. FUCK. AROUND. They whip out the weapons, they wax the motherfucker and deposit the unlucky fellow directly into my colon! Into my colon. There's no nonsense! There's no miranda warning, there's none of that three strikes and your out bullshit. First defense, BAM! Into the colon you go!

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:George Carlin said it best by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Two words:

      "Survivorship bias"

    2. Re:George Carlin said it best by Phoenixlol · · Score: 1

      Another one of my favorites from him in this vein was something along the lines of "I only wash the three areas that really need attention when I shower; pits, groin, and ass."

  39. well by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    Bacteria would not be harboring around if people would actually clean their shower and shower head once in a while with bleach and/or CLR; or completely change out the shower head out with a new one every two years.

  40. not to be stereotypical here but... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to be stereotypical here but I don't shower regularly right now, on account of the whole "unemployed, no need to interact with people right now" part of my life.

    After a couple "cycles" of only showering once every other/third day, my body acclimated to the different bathing. I found/find that my skin is, overall, much clearer (lifelong acme sufferer) as well as substantially less oily. I no longer feel like there's grease in my eyes by the time I go to bed, and my skin feels 'healthier'.

    I wonder if routine shower cleaning would help fix the problem? I'd think that the chlorine in the water would help dissuade bacteria from growing. I wonder if that 1/3rd can be accounted for by low chlorine levels, or well water? We have non-chlorinated well water here, as do both my parents and grandmother, all in different parts of the country.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by TheABomb · · Score: 4, Funny

      (lifelong acme sufferer)

      Ah, but how often do coyotes normally shower?

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    2. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 1

      I'd think that the chlorine in the water would help dissuade bacteria from growing. I wonder if that 1/3rd can be accounted for by low chlorine levels, or well water? We have non-chlorinated well water here, as do both my parents and grandmother, all in different parts of the country.

      You would think... but the authors of the original article point out that mycobacteria are generally resistant to chlorination, which may be why they're enriched in these cases: less competition. This is supported by the fact that they only found the enrichment in municipal (chlorinated) water sources, but not the (four) un-chlorinated well-water sources.

      Ain't biology cool?

    3. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just got used to being dirty. Take a shower, now.

    4. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      After a couple "cycles" of only showering once every other/third day, my body acclimated to the different bathing. I found/find that my skin is, overall, much clearer (lifelong acme sufferer) as well as substantially less oily. I no longer feel like there's grease in my eyes by the time I go to bed, and my skin feels 'healthier'.

      I once met a guy with long dreadlocks (white guy) who claimed that after not washing his hair for a very, very long time it basically became self-cleaning. Not sure how true it is but based on your post it might be.

    5. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or suffer from the chronic purchasing of bogus, yet name-brand, gimmicks?

    6. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Eh, I don't know about self-cleaning, but inherently less "dirty" feeling, probably. The body puts out oil rapidly after a shower largely due to the shower - the natural biological protective film has been washed off and it needs to be replaced. If you're not showering regularly, you're not washing it off regularly.

      Kinda goes along with the fairly-recent Old World view that bathing regularly is bad for your health/sign of poor moral fortitude (they used to be largely synonymous.) (My aunt was an exchange student in France 30-odd years ago and that was their opinion on bathing then.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I no longer feel like there's grease in my eyes by the time I go to bed, and my skin feels 'healthier'"

      Getting fired from Burger King will do that.

    8. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been doing the same thing here. Mostly to save money from not having to heat the water every day plus just not using as much water.

      I agree that overall it feels healthier. Modern society uses all these harsh chemicals to scrub off things that shouldn't be scrubbed off. It screws our bodies all up. Until I stopped using normal shampoo I never realized how incredibly harsh it was on my hair. Regular shampoo basically turn my hair into straw (dried out and stiff or covered with nasty silicon conditioner). I always thought that was just the way my hair was until I stopped with the crappy chemicals.

      I still have a hard time with it though just because I like taking a shower. It's makes a nice break from having to do stuff and it's good for relaxed thinking.

    9. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dermatologists (doctors specializing in skin diseases) recommend not showering more often than every 3rd day and/or showering without soap. I've not had any problems with smell when showering with just water and using suitable deodorant or being careful with replacing clothes every day.

    10. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment in months. So great, in fact, I went and added your blog to my feed reader (yeah, I'm old-school... sorta). Even though it has been a year and a half, I eagerly await Brother Artie's next entry.

    11. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WIN

    12. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or suffer from the chronic purchasing of bogus, yet name-brand, gimmicks?

      Stop making fun of Macs. That's mean!

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    13. Re:not to be stereotypical here but... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I'll have to say that showering every other or every third day does lead to me having substantially less acne. I used to bathe regularly, put all the god face-cleansing shit on, and still be pimply. Then I stopped using all that stuff, showered less often, and the problem went away.
      I'll be more willing to bet on it being the product that you use. If you just used plain water to shower every day without any products, you'd likely see the same reduction in acne.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  41. Details? Who needs details? by TheClockworkSoul · · Score: 2, Informative
    For those craving details, the original article can be found here.

    Here's a copy of the abstract, for my fellow bio nerds:

    The environments we humans encounter daily are sources of exposure to diverse microbial communities, some of potential concern to human health. In this study, we used culture-independent technology to investigate the microbial composition of biofilms inside showerheads as ecological assemblages in the human indoor environment. Showers are an important interface for human interaction with microbes through inhalation of aerosols, and showerhead waters have been implicated in disease. Although opportunistic pathogens commonly are cultured from shower facilities, there is little knowledge of either their prevalence or the nature of other microorganisms that may be delivered during shower usage. To determine the composition of showerhead biofilms and waters, we analyzed rRNA gene sequences from 45 showerhead sites around the United States. We find that variable and complex, but specific, microbial assemblages occur inside showerheads. Particularly striking was the finding that sequences representative of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and other opportunistic human pathogens are enriched to high levels in many showerhead biofilms, >100-fold above background water contents. We conclude that showerheads may present a significant potential exposure to aerosolized microbes, including documented opportunistic pathogens. The health risk associated with showerhead microbiota needs investigation in persons with compromised immune or pulmonary systems.

  42. Mod up!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 informative

  43. CU Boulder by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is all based on a study out of CU Boulder. As a Denver resident, I can attest that the dirty hippies at CU Boulder are on a never-ending quest to justify their poor hygiene. Don't be fooled! Shower every day!

    -Peter

    1. Re:CU Boulder by nobdoor · · Score: 1

      Maybe 40 years ago. Boulder hippies are a dying breed. The county has recently become "californicated" by girls with too-big sunglasses and ugs, and straight-brimmed hat snowboard thugs. If you're looking for the hippies, Bozeman MT is supposed to be closer to what Boulder was 40 years ago.

    2. Re:CU Boulder by Khashishi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ad hominem

    3. Re:CU Boulder by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Most jokes are.

      -Peter

    4. Re:CU Boulder by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Ashland, WI houses one of the bigger liberal arts private colleges in the united states. It seems to be a nesting ground for the hippy culture. You want to see some dirty hippies... come up here sometime. I'll show you around.

      Aside from hygiene... theyre some of the nicest people you'll meet.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    5. Re:CU Boulder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poor sense of humor

  44. It's all covered with germs! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  45. Sure cure... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    Just remove the shower head, and let it dry. Then, into the pipe end pour some cherry kool-aid powder.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  46. Re:First shower! by icebike · · Score: 1

    Actually, even tho you were modded off-topic, you probably have something here...

    Simply don't be the first to shower. Problem solved.

    Also seems to me that the normal Run it till its hot drill would solve this issue, as any concentration is likely in the first 20 seconds.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  47. A Victory for Open Source! by wsanders · · Score: 3, Funny

    I declare this a victory for Open Source. Now - on to making beards, sandals with black socks, and red suspenders fashionable again!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:A Victory for Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I declare this a victory for Open Source. Now - on to making beards, sandals with black socks, and red suspenders fashionable!

      FTFY

  48. Don't Forget Legionnaire's Disease... by logistic · · Score: 1

    MAC is a pretty ubiquitous organism and clearly and emerging infection not only in the immunocompromised.
    For people who live in older large buildings, legionnaire's is more likely to be a serious infection.
    So much so that in many areas hospitals have to check their water regularly for it's presence to prevent outbreaks.

    Legionnaire's it's not just from air conditioners anymore...

  49. sensationalism, again by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    "For most people, taking a shower is not dangerous, but if you are immune compromised, such as the elderly or pregnant, it could be,"

    He then says to not use plastic shower heads. But they are all plastic if you have the detachable hose kind useful for washing your hair or your children. Now while the effects sound scary in the wikipedia entry, is this killing healthy children? Parents are so paranoid, and they don't need a bunch of misinformation or half-truths to cause them to panic and either replace all their showerheads or quit letting their older kids take showers.

    The article is light on information and facts, and high on scary words.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  50. Dry cleaning? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Did you ever get something on your clothes and get it off with your fingernail? That's dry cleaning. - Jerry Seinfeld

  51. Let's make the germs stronger, faster... better... by AP31R0N · · Score: 0

    GERMS! GERMS! GERMS!
    Germs that cause colds, bad breath... DIARRHEA!
    Germs that flourish in YOUR family bathroom!

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  52. I see the reason by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Dear pesants, we need you to use less water since fresh water is getting scarce on Earth. We need you smelly unwashed masses to use less of OUR water so we can have pools and fountains and allow us elite types to shower more. So here, we offer this scary article to curb that water usage so there is more for our artifical private lakes we like to jet ski in. Remember don't drive that nasty green house spewing car as we drive around in private jets and boats that burn more fuel in an hour then you use in a month to tell you how you are hurting OUR environment.

    Please, next you'll see them marketing cheaper 'disposable' shower heads so the ignorant pesants buy more cheap crap.

    Step 1: Remove shower head
    Step 2: Fill a bucket with warm water
    Step 3: Add 1/2 a cup of bleach to the bucket of warm water
    Step 4: Drop shower head in said bucket
    Step 5: Go work in the cubical fields wage slave!
    Step 6: Come back and remove shower head from the now cold, heartless bucket of water.
    Step 7: (For the extra paranoid)spray the showhead with some Lysol or give it a second dip in some CLR if you have lime scale or calcium deposits.
    Step 8: Reattach shower head
    Step 9: Cowtow to the picture of your boss and thank them for privilege of allowing you to work for them.
    Step 10: Take a shower just to piss them off after you come to your senses.
    Step 11: Beg the water warden not to rat you out after you used more then your 1/2 gallon of water you were rationed for the day. Meanwhile the wealthy will enjoy steam rooms, lap pools, fountains and other nice things while you fester in filthy 3 day recycled bath water...

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:I see the reason by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      You sound like Alex Jones.....

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  53. Perfect⦠by cstromme · · Score: 1

    Because this article is exactly what the users of this site needs. Less of a reason to take a shower. :p

  54. Tip the shower head UP? by macraig · · Score: 1

    I have a daily routine that might prevent this problem, though it was hardly my intention:

    I have a shower "extender", a z-shaped arm which raises the height of the shower head by a few inches. I happen to hate routine maintenance like removing hard water precipitates from shower heads, and I discovered a way to avoid it completely: after a shower, I loosen the thumbscrew of the upper elbow of the extender and rotate it into an upward-facing position, shower head and all.

    This has the effect of letting water drain back out of the shower head, rather than collect and then form those precipitates we all love so much. Perhaps it also creates an inhospitable, or less hospitable, environment for Mycobacterium avium in the process?

    1. Re:Tip the shower head UP? by PPH · · Score: 1

      One could also take a shower in the tub and, after shutting off the water, turn the shower/tub valve half way which allows the shower head plumbing to drain down.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Tip the shower head UP? by macraig · · Score: 1

      That doesn't prevent a small amount of water from collecting at and inside the shower head itself. I *always* open the diverter after every shower; what I described is an additional step. Without that extender and the additional step, a small amount of water would still collect at the shower head and evaporate.

  55. coworkers by chelip · · Score: 1

    Some coworkers have been avoiding getting infected by this bacteria for what looks like some years. Ancient wisdom maybe?

  56. this guy must of sponsored this study by iccaros · · Score: 1

    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6685890.html Shower head provided with an ultraviolet lamp United States Patent 6685890

  57. Oligodynamic effect by emil · · Score: 4, Informative

    Metal shower heads are most likely safer due to the Oligodynamic effect.

    1. Re:Oligodynamic effect by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      To which might be added that I'm pretty sure that ghetto-ass showerheads that hold a lot of water when off are going to display the effect most.

      The house I'm living in now has a completely braindead water system that delivers maybe 5 GPM to the inside of the house, tops, as in that's the most you could pull out of all the faucets at once if you opened 'em all. There's a 20 GPM pump not that far from the house (vertically or horizontally) but it has to fight a ton of right angles to get water up here. There's a 2.5 GPM brass showerhead that I associate with hippies, because it makes a much finer spray than almost any other showerhead and it used to be marketed as an ion producer, which it most certainly must be. I believe later they marketed it as a low-flow showerhead, which it was also, but that was just a sort of hippie side-benefit in the marketing literature I recall. It's small and brass so it fits in nicely in the nautical scene, so I've seen 'em on boats, too. Regardless, they don't hold any water and they're made of brass, and we have one. We also have water from a well that's full of iron and other minerals, yet this showerhead requires no maintenance (so far.) I suspect it has much to do with the high rates of water flow; where an obstruction builds up, the flow rate increases (at least until there is an actual blockage, but that just increases flow rate around the blockage until a passage is completely closed) and the obstruction is worn away. Since the flow rates are so high, this showerhead is effectively self-cleaning in the majority of conditions.

      By contrast, when I've cleaned out the inside of plastic showerheads, which actually have an inside and need cleaning, I have often found them not only to be full of mineral particles, but also to contain mold and to have a solid biofilm built up on their interior surface. Biofilms are usually complex colonies of organisms, so it should be no surprise if there's nasty stuff in there.

      Short form: Shitty cheap plastic showerheads are bad, fancy (but not inordinately expensive) metal showerheads are good. Shock, amazement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Oligodynamic effect by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hippies take showers?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Oligodynamic effect by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      as matter of fact yes, some do.

      My girlfriend's mother is full fledged hippy: Tie dye, dreads, patchouli...etc and she showers on a regular basis.

      May be a rare occurrence, but not all hippies are filthy.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    4. Re:Oligodynamic effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would people who drank too much colloidal silver and have thus turned blue/grey have a built in extra defense against infection? Then again I suppose this effect would work on their living cells as well.

    5. Re:Oligodynamic effect by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Two hippies got married in a swimming pool. It was a double ring ceremony.

  58. Hot water won't help. by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 2, Informative

    At first I thought that you could just "disinfect" your shower head by running it scalding hot for 30 seconds before jumping in. However, Mycobacterium Avium has a 90% survival rate in water at 120F, the typical temperature in your water heater. Bleach and CLR won't help either, since Mycobacterium Avium is much less affected by it than other competing germs, so you end up worsening the situation.

    1. Re:Hot water won't help. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I disagree;

      Though it will not kill the bacteria it will wash many of them out of the shower head which is just as good.

    2. Re:Hot water won't help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleach will kill the bacteria! It may take a few minutes, but they will be dead.

    3. Re:Hot water won't help. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Hot water will help. You just have to make it hot enough.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  59. Legionella bacteria by irp · · Score: 1

    In Denmark we had the problem with the Legionella bacteria a couple of years ago. In order to save heat/oil/electricity, most had turned the hot water temperature down and the bacteria was able to survive somewhere in the hot water system (a problem in larger departments, where there is a central water heater, long pipelines, and the individual resident can not control the temperature of incoming water).

    Especially old people were in danger when inhaling water aerosols containing bacteria. The problem was of course unnoticed for several years, but is estimated to have caused several deaths.

    Solution to the problem; the water temperature in the hot water system should not go below a certain threshold.

  60. Chlorine shower vapors by JamJam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's also talk of health risks due to taking hot showers. Supposedly that releases chlorine and chloroform gas creating a health risk, particularly for those with asthma. I guess that's why there are chlorine filters for shower heads. Then again a filter would likely be a breading ground for bacteria so pick your poison...

  61. Guess what's also an ideal breeding ground? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Living dirty like shit. ^^

    On a more serious note: What's actually worse than bacteria (many of which you actually need on your skin to stay healthy), is the overuse of skin "care" products when not needed.
    Especially when they destroy your natural layers of protection.
    I learned that the more simple it is, the better it is. I mean what do you really need to get your skin clean again?
    You don't want to remove all the tallow/fat for obvious health reasons, so you will only need a tiny bit of tensides.
    This also helps protect your skin from drying out from the water (which "normal" health products actually enable if used "normally", and then "fix" again. Selling it to you like some great feature.) The other thing that helps drying out, is of course, to not stand in the water half the day. ^^ (In that case you need some external fat sources to refill your protective layer.)

    And then? Hmm... I guess that's it. Bacteria can't usually get through the skin anyway. After all, that's one of the reasons it exists in the first place.

    So what is all the rest for?
    To temporarily make your skin softer than normal, while being bad for it in the long run. (E.g. Dove)
    To coat your hair with "protective substances" that aren't very healthy for them, just so they look and feel better, but actually aren't. (Typical product sold with this wording: Panthene shampoo & co.)
    etc, etc, etc.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  62. soooo.... by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    Most germs are killed with heat. Most people take hot showers, the hotter, the better. So most people don't have to worry.... um.... unless you are the few percentage that takes cold showers. heehee

  63. Kitchen Faucet by BurfCurse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is a kitchen faucet any different than a shower head? I can honestly say that the shit I put in my sink is a hell of a lot dirtier than my hair. Wouldn't sticking your glass underneath the faucet and then going straight to your face with it pose just as much of an inhalation hazard as a shower?

  64. plastic bag, a bit of clorox... by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Disinfecting a shower head is trivial. Pour some bleach in a bag, with enough water to immerse the shower head, put the shower head in the bag, use a twist-tie to hold it in place for a couple of minutes.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:plastic bag, a bit of clorox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleach does not kill everything, and is highly corrosive to metal. I would suggest Chlorine Dioxide.

    2. Re:plastic bag, a bit of clorox... by TheSlashaway · · Score: 1

      Just remember to rinse it afterwards or you may get bleach in your eyes when you turn on the shower.

    3. Re:plastic bag, a bit of clorox... by jcr · · Score: 1

      If you can damage your showerhead with a couple of minutes of immersion in a chlorine solution, then you should replace it anyway.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  65. Government response by kalel666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Dept of Health and Human Services has released guidelines to prevent this phenomenon.
    The General Order Lessening Dirty Elevated Nozzles is now in effect and mandatory for all.

    Everyone will be required to take G.O.L.D.E.N showers henceforth.

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    1. Re:Government response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      informitive!

    2. Re:Government response by danger42 · · Score: 1

      And then have a hot lunch afterward.

      --
      -nd
  66. The stinky Europeans were right? by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

    So that means all of those stinky Europeans are doing it right? I just spent a month working in Brussels, and sometimes on the train or metro you'd get a whiff of somebody taking this news as a religious credo.

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    1. Re:The stinky Europeans were right? by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      So that means all of those stinky Europeans are doing it right? I just spent a month working in Brussels, and sometimes on the train or metro you'd get a whiff of somebody taking this news as a religious credo.

      Occasional people with BO? On public transport, of all places?!?
      THIS WOULD NEVER HAPPEN IN AMERICA!

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    2. Re:The stinky Europeans were right? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Another anecdote for ya: I just spent two weeks in San Sebastián, Spain, and I had to visit five stores before I found one that sold deodorant, and they only had ONE kind.

  67. reason for no chlorine in well water. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    Because It's just not necessary.
    most bacteria just cant make it without light or heat down to extreme depths. My well water comes straight up from 600' down, a cold dark place, then a short horizontal distance. It is filtered first underground through sand, rock, then at the house, and finally with a carbon filter. I think the need for all the chemical treatments comes from the city not having all that much control of the horizontal runs. Constantly having some small sections repaired (introducing contaminants) and dealing with the possibility of back flow from houses without (or malfunctioned) back flow devices, unused sections exposed to good growing environments...

  68. Black Death by Powys · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the physicians during the Black Plague had their shit together afterall!

  69. Air Born by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this on TV this morning. Seems the bacterium can get air born from the shower spray, and then you inhale them. So Soap is not going to help there.

  70. Doesn't add up. by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    "When the researchers swabbed and tested 50 shower heads from nine cities in seven different states in the US, including New York City and Denver, they found 30% of the devices posed a potential risk."

    This study was done in the US, and though the sample size is small, 30% is certainly not "very low."

  71. Look Around You by airherbe · · Score: 1

    Also, according to the BBC, germs originated from Germany .

    "Get well soon, Professor."

  72. Intelligent life. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, but once your shower evolves the ability to speak, it's just nag, nag, nag:

    You're fat.
    Wash behind your ears.
    Having you been getting enough sleep?
    Where have you been?
    Have you been showering in another bathroom?

    It's better to just apply a regular scrubbing and avoid the headaches altogether.

  73. Just water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can try showering without using any soap or shampoo. Sure, the first few times you might think your hair is greasy. But that feeling is actually your hair being lightly coated with natural oils. When your scalp gets used to the "no shampoo" regime, it will turn down the grease factory. This leaves you with way better looking, better feeling and much, much healthier hair. Works wonders for your skin, too.

  74. Better lay summary in the Guardian by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

    Better because they got the British Medical Journal to write it - link

  75. Keep your immune system working! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Oh for god's sake. People who aren't readily exposed to various bad-bugs aren't going to build an immunity to things like this. And the fact that people rarely, if ever, hear of this form of infection is quite likely that people are generally immune to it because they are constantly exposed to it.

    So leave your shower heads ALONE. Change them only when you think the one you have now isn't good enough. If your immune system is doing its job, you'll be fine. If it's not, there's probably a LOT of things that will get you before this one does.

    If you're one of those purell sickos... well, let me tell you, I have some really expensive shower-heads to sell you.

  76. Simple Enough Solution by severoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    This problem of the dirty shower head is easily solved by my approach. Instead of hooking up to a city water tap, I just had a giant tank of bactine installed that I use instead. Best part: no soap required, just a wire brush and a brillo pad and you're in and out as fast as you can say, Where'd all my skin go?

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:Simple Enough Solution by ABasketOfPups · · Score: 1

      Dear god, I got to "where'd my skin go" and nearly spat 7-Up all over my monitor, you bastard!

  77. Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being alive is dangerous and may lead to death, studies show.

    1. Re:Breaking News! by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      May? Your ideas intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Interesting.
  78. This may come as a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But hospitals are full of sick people, people with compromised immune systems, and people with giant gaping holes in them.
    Also, staph is freakin' EVERYWHERE, just waiting for breaks in the skin to enter and a compromised immune system to take hold.

  79. headlines by w0mprat · · Score: 1



    TFP (the scientific paper) may be titled: "M. avium found in showerheads at 100 times the level of drinking water"

    Science magazine headline (Newscientist) was: "Shower heads make a perfect home for bugs "

    Slashdot: "Taking Showers Can Be Harmful To Your Health"

    (Correlation != Causation) != We'reAllGoingToDIE

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  80. Can't you clean it once in awhile? by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing I'm wondering is, why would you *replace* the shower head, when most likely, can you deal with this problem as simply as soaking the shower head in a bleach-water solution once a month or something (might not even need to do it that often)?

    While I generally agree with the point about immune systems, even a perfectly healthy person with a fine immune system could succumb if exposed to a sufficient concentration of these bacteria. Wouldn't an occasional cleaning of the shower head be more than enough to prevent such a dangerous buildup? Wouldn't that be simple, common sense ( I've always been taught that cleanliness is important to remain healthy, and that includes keeping kitchen, bathroom, etc clean)?

  81. Less inhalation risk, I suspect by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    Based on one of the linked articles, I believe the risk posed by shower heads is not only that the bacteria grow there, but that when you are running the shower, some of the water becomes a fine mist which is easily inhaled. I've never had my sink faucet create a mist, though. But, you are right, I think, about the possibility of bacteria growing in the faucet. Apparently, inhalation is a bigger risk factor for these bacteria than ingestion.

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. It's only bad if you have AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need a CD4 count less than 50 before it will happen to you.

  84. ewwww by flahwho · · Score: 1

    Not taking a shower can can be bad for MY health!

    STFU

  85. Golden Showers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like I should start taking Golden Showers.

  86. Flamebait? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you think that the above is flamebait then you are a hippie who needs to take a shower. I am from Santa Cruz and may use the word hippie as much as I want because people all over the world automatically think I am one. I do exhibit many of the characteristics; I do, however, shower.

    If you were offended by my frequent overuse of the word hippie, you'll hate these jokes even more:

    Q: How do you hide money from a hippie?
    A: Hide it under the soap.

    Q: How do you know a hippie has been on your couch?
    A: They're still there!

    Now grow up, and allow your sense of humor to drop out of the cavity it's hiding in.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  87. Hot water heater goes to 180F by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Once every month or so, I raise the household hot water from 120 Degrees F to 180F and flush out the dishwasher. I'm assuming 180F will pretty much kill anything after a few minutes. I'll run the shower at the same time (and steam my clothes, might as well use the steam).

  88. The ultimate revenge of the nerds... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    ...we may be smellier than 'cool' people, but we'll live longer!

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  89. guess our developers @ work are safe by vaporland · · Score: 1

    given how rarely they apparently bathe...

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  90. OTOH by durin · · Score: 1

    Not taking showers could also be harmful to your health.

    --
    Why, yes! I AM new here.
  91. Not to worry by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

    As a Frenchman, I guess I've got nothing to worry about... Just kidding... (and yes, I'm really French).

  92. And that's before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's before they they even saw my shower curtain!..

  93. Laughing by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Funny.

  94. A link to a better story, posted amid the nonsense by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1