Slashdot Mirror


(Near) Constant Internet While RV'ing?

Neilio writes "What systems would Slashdotters recommend for staying connected while RV'ing across the US and Canada? While a 3G data plan seems obvious, the intrepid RV'er wants to get remote and into those parts of the coverage map that are usually gray (no coverage). But satellite can be expensive, includes high latency for VoIP and gaming, and requires a clear view of the southern sky. I've come across some intriguing products that use an amplified 2G/3G signal and bridge to WiFi, like WiFi In Motion, and CradlePoint's MBR1000 (I have no affiliation with either). Do folks have any experience with these, or can you recommend another approach (even homebrew)? While I am an electrical engineer by degree, you have to go back a few decades since I last expertly sported a soldering iron, so the less DIY the better. My wife and I now run a web-based business, so nearly daily connectivity is a must, no matter where we are."

438 comments

  1. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What exactly is RV'ing?

    1. Re:What? by natehoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      RV = Recreational Vehicle. It's a small (or sometimes large) home on wheels.

      I think the Brits call them "Caravans", in case you're from that side of the pond. ;)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:What? by Nursie · · Score: 5, Funny

      We'd probably call it a camper van. A large camper van.

      A caravan is something old people tow behind their hysterically underpowered cars in order to clog up the smaller roads in rural Britain with maximum effectiveness for any public holiday weekend.

    3. Re:What? by bertoelcon · · Score: 0, Troll

      RV = Recreational Vehicle.

      That is odd I use my boat for recreation but it doesn't qualify as a RV. I use my off road rigs for recreation too. Someone care to explain?

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    4. Re:What? by Locutus · · Score: 5, Funny

      RV'ing is when you put on a one-piece jump suit, throw all your stuff in a big box on wheels and drive up any hill you can find at the slowest speed possible and still be considered moving. If you see a place where you can park your big box, you pull over and most likely others, also wearing one-piece jump suits, will pull over too. You all make drinks and talk about each others big box, your next big box, and the box that got away.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dumb question. So, no.

    6. Re:What? by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is odd I use my boat for recreation but it doesn't qualify as a RV. I use my off road rigs for recreation too. Someone care to explain?

      Starfish aren't fish, either, and you park on driveways and drive on parkways. It's called language. Get used to it...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:What? by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

      What exactly is RV'ing? Can I do it without leaving my mom's basement?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is ignorance and the inability to use google "insightful"?

    9. Re:What? by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Funny

      So it's like a lan party, only with more driving?

    10. Re:What? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just the term that's developed in the US for a large van or bus that has beds in it.

      If you call it a "Recreational Vehicle", most "RV" drivers would look at you oddly anyway, so the acronym has largely lost its original roots.

      Some call them "Campers", but that's usually a term reserved for the type you tow behind another vehicle. Somehow, the term "RV" came into usage for the ones that are built onto a chassis that has an engine and drivetrain.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    11. Re:What? by vlm · · Score: 1

      That is odd I use my boat for recreation but it doesn't qualify as a RV. I use my off road rigs for recreation too. Someone care to explain?

      Its disambiguation.

      From the wikipedia "The earliest caravans were used for practical purposes rather than recreation, such as providing shelter and accommodation for people travelling in search of an audience for their art, or to offer their services to distant employers, or to reach a new place of abode." (Yes the misspelling is wikipedia's not mine)

      So, if people originally used boats for purely commercial purposes, and recently started using a slightly different style boat for purely recreational purposes, its possible that recreational (non-commercial) boat would be called a recreational vehicle or RV, as opposed to the commercial boats we all have experienced.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    12. Re:What? by poetmatt · · Score: 0

      haven't you see the family guy where quagmire sleeps with a woman in every state?

    13. Re:What? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I advise forgetting the RV and traveling by hotel instead. I do a lot of traveling and all hotels have internet connectivity, even it's just a phone line. The better hotels let you connect direct to an ethernet line, like the one I stayed at in Oklahoma City which only cost ~$800 a month with free net access.

      And the distance from the hotel to "nature" is typically only half-an-hour. You can go picnic, enjoy the outdoors, and then come back to the hotel for a hot shower and free cable TV.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    14. Re:What? by catdriver · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

    15. Re:What? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good point.

      An RV would probably more accurately be called a "Camper Van". My mistake. Though I don't know if you have a separate term for one the size of a bus, errrr, lorry.

      A "Caravan" would be (depending on size) probably called a "Pop-up" (very small one that collapses), "Camper" (about the size of an automobile, the ones that Top Gear are always destroying), or a "Fifth Wheel" (if it requires a very large truck and sleeps more than 4) in the US, if I have my English to USEnglish translator working correctly. Unless you have other terms for the pop-up type and/or the really big "sleeps eight" behemoths.

      Sorry for the confusion.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    16. Re:What? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      RV = Recreational Vehicle.

      It's a synonym for "girlfriend".
      Since you're probably unfamiliar with this term, here's an explanation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girlfriend.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    17. Re:What? by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      RV = Recreational Vehicle. It's a small (or sometimes large) home on wheels.

      Large is an understatement. Some of the RVs I have seen on the road should easily be able to light up towers for hundreds of miles with roof mounted antennas. Depending upon exactly how ridiculously tall the posterâ(TM)s RV is, denial of service might be an issue to be considered.

    18. Re:What? by Eravau · · Score: 1

      Whereas we Americans would probably call your idea of a "caravan"... a camper. A caravan is a line of camels, horses, buggies, cars, whatever traveling together in a line.

    19. Re:What? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      one-piece jump suit? I don't think I've ever seen that. Depending on the geographic area, it's usually jeans and a t-shirt or loud golf shorts.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    20. Re:What? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ha ha.

      In the UK a caravan is a caravan. If it sleeps 8 and has e.g. 2 axles and requires towing by a 4x4 or whatever, it's just a 'big caravan'. A smaller single axle one that sleeps maybe up to 4 is just called a 'caravan' or a 'small caravan'.

      The kind of thing that collapses into a small trailer is called a 'trailer tent', if it's the thing I'm thinking of. Also an alternative name for a 'camper van' is just 'camper' or 'caravanette' (less frequently used).

    21. Re:What? by BumbaCLot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mickey: Good dags. D'ya like dags?
      Tommy: Dags?
      Mickey: What?
      Mrs. O'Neil: Yeah, dags.
      Tommy: Oh, dogs. Sure, I like dags. I like caravans more.

    22. Re:What? by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      Always ready to find a proper use for a Caravan, the folks at Top Gear posted this.

    23. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about hysterically underpowered. I used to tow a caravan with a 1936 Rolls Royce. The sublime and the ridiculous in one package.

    24. Re:What? by Haxzaw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whatever the attire, the couple must wear matching items.

    25. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this approach.

      Only thing I've noticed is that the more expensive the hotel, the more they want you to pay for internet.

      Many of the cheapies just give you wireless in your room for free.

    26. Re:What? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      And less internet (see above).

    27. Re:What? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      A caravan is a piece of shit minivan made by Dodge.

    28. Re:What? by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      Very well said! This post deserves a score higher! Yes it's language, it's human, and it's not logical :-)

    29. Re:What? by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      We'd probably call it a camper van. A large camper van.

      A caravan is something old people tow behind their hysterically underpowered cars in order to clog up the smaller roads in rural Britain with maximum effectiveness for any public holiday weekend.

      You forget mentioning holding up a long stream of traffic.

      1) Once the road rage is about to boil over you make sure you speed back up when you hit a long straight suitable for overtaking.

      2) Then on a four lane highway make sure you really stand on it ensure as little as possible of the queue can get ahead of you ready for the next congested B-road.

      3) Go up hills at about half the typical speed of traffic, ignore the slow vehicle turn outs.

      4) If you have a poorly maintained diesel make sure you keep your foot firmly planted for billowing black smoke.

      5) Do your best to ignore the speed wobbles from towing your caravan above the speed limit, sure it's scary, but delightfully, it's frightening the hell out of anyone following you.

      Remeber the cops will all but ignore your dangerous driving yet pull over those who overtake you at a rate of knots (revenue related - taking you to court for dangerous driving is expensive, dishing out fines is profit).

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    30. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked myself the same question. Then I headed over to Urban Dictionary. Here are the results, most appropriate (according to UD) to least appropriate:

      - Rape Victim
      - Recreational vehicle / Road Virus
      - reverse titty fuck
      - pure liquid shit that resembles brown soup
      - Rank Vagina
      - ruins vacations
      - Recreational Vehicle
      - remote viewing
      - have sex with someone randomly or planned / fuck
      - RedBull + voddy drink

      Please, say "RV'ing across the US", substituting each of these in place of RV, one after the other. That should be a nice vacation.

    31. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:What? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      what you call a "trailer tent" is often called a "camper" or "camper trailer" or "pop-up camper" in some parts of the US.

      There is another type of rare travel trailer that is called a pop-up that has no tent structure at all, it is just a larger box that slips over a smaller box, and a large wheel crank is used to slide the two pieces apart. It has a dutch door (aka stable door) and is pretty old. I don't know who made them, but I used to go on vacation as a kid in one. sleeps 4 if you are willing to share beds (so it's tiny).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    33. Re:What? by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Starfish aren't fish, either, and you park on driveways and drive on parkways. It's called language. Get used to it...

      Well, no ... starfish may not be fish, but RV's certainly are recreational vehicles. That's a pretty horrible analogy.

      Also driveways and parkways are both properly named, it's just your base assumption which is wrong. A driveway is a private path on which you drive in order to reach the house, and a parkway is a road which passes through a "landscaped thoroughfare" or a park. Both words make perfect sense if you understand their origin.

    34. Re:What? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      but how will random people with the same appreciation for jump suits find you at a hotel? It'll only work if the hotel looks like a big box on wheels. It's a lifestyle baby, nobody said it was done because it was easy. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    35. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I advise forgetting the RV and traveling by hotel instead.

      I tried that one time. I stayed in that hotel for a week and when I left I'll be damned if that thing moved an inch.

    36. Re:What? by krilli · · Score: 1

      I'll just be keyboard'ing in a quick reply here.

      It's like car'ing and house'ing at the same time.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    37. Re:What? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Very well said! This post deserves a score higher! Yes it's language, it's human, and it's not logical :-)

      Does "it" refer to the GP, English, or both?

      --
      $ make available
    38. Re:What? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "I advise forgetting the RV and traveling by hotel instead. I do a lot of traveling and all hotels have internet connectivity, even it's just a phone line. The better hotels let you connect direct to an ethernet line, like the one I stayed at in Oklahoma City which only cost ~$800 a month with free net access.

      And the distance from the hotel to "nature" is typically only half-an-hour. You can go picnic, enjoy the outdoors, and then come back to the hotel for a hot shower and free cable TV."

      I've wanted to do this kind of trip by motorcycle!! If I could somehow get 2-3 weeks off, and friends that could do the same, and just to the 'iron-butt' ride around a good bit of the US.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    39. Re:What? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no, I don't want him to get used to hit, I want those idiots to stop using it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:What? by robbiedo · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the only way to do it, by motorcycle...and nice hotels.

    41. Re:What? by fructose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Starfish aren't fish, either...

      The fish took offense to that name, so we call them "sea stars" now. Keep up with the times, you insensitive clod.

    42. Re:What? by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1

      and more women. Plus a whole new level of drunkenness.

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    43. Re:What? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      There isn't any misspelling in the quoted text.

    44. Re:What? by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny +1 Funny -1 Overrated -1 Overrated -1 Troll? I can understand the overrated but seriously troll?

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    45. Re:What? by bshensky · · Score: 1

      a caravan is a piece of shit minivan made by Chry^H^H^H^HDaimlerChr^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HFiat.

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
    46. Re:What? by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

      The bigger question is, why do we have a pair of underpants but only one bra?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    47. Re:What? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      *whips out a string of garlic, a wooden stake, and a mallet*

      Stay back grammar boy.

    48. Re:What? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      But the women tend to be old.

    49. Re:What? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Um, you forgot the top of the line RV (a REAL recreational vehicle). A nice example is featured on the Terrawind website, along with some other interesting stuff like speed boat sports cars...
      http://www.terrawind.com/terrawind.htm

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    50. Re:What? by oldhack · · Score: 1

      To add to the fun:

      RVs are big buses. Campers (trailers) are what we call winebagos. Look'em up.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    51. Re:What? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, I read about that in Off-Road Rolls-Royce Magazine years ago. It carried articles about "Four-wheel Drive and Your Rolls", "Shooting Quail from Your Rolls", "Cooking Potatoes in Aluminium Foil on Your Engine", and "What to Do If Your Driver Is Eaten by a Bear".

    52. Re:What? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Who's we? Winnebago is a brand of RV. If they do make trailers, it's not what they're best known for.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    53. Re:What? by quenda · · Score: 1

      A caravan is a piece of shit minivan made by Dodge.

      Speaking of which, what exactly is "mini" about a minivan? Around here, a van is a car-sized enclosed cargo vehicle.

    54. Re:What? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      The early precursers to trousers were separate items - one per leg. So you would have a 'pair of hose' ... which gradually evolved into a pair of breeches, and a pair of trousers (or pants).
      Technically, that means each 'leg' of your underpants counts as separate, it's only convenience that has them being joined up.
      A brassiere on the other hand is a much more recent item of clothing - but it evolved from a single piece 'chest wrap' that held both breasts in place - there was never a separate item, one for each breast - and so it never became a 'pair' of anything.

    55. Re:What? by afex · · Score: 1

      note sure if you're serious or not, but "van" had referred to conversion fans or full-size vans. (see: dodge/benz sprinter)

    56. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, what exactly is "mini" about a minivan? Around here, a van is a car-sized enclosed cargo vehicle.

      In the US, a "van" is any box-enclosed compartment vehicle, be it for cargo or passengers.

      A "full-size van" is normally built on an American full-size pickup truck chassis, which is a bit larger than a sedan/saloon chassis.

      Full-size vans aren't the largest "vans" though. Any box-shaped cargo vehicle can be called a van. For instance, the truck that you load all your furniture and possessions into to move to a new house or apartment is a "moving van", even if it's a large 18-wheeler.

      "Minivans" (equivalent to European MPVs) also normally have passenger car styling, suspensions, etc, while regular vans often have less posh appointments and more rugged cargo/truck suspensions (even when they're intended as larger passenger vans).
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_size_van

      If you go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van and look at the pictures on the right, there are examples of US full-size vans and minivans.

    57. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you certainly took the fun right out of *that*

    58. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks AC, now I feel guilty about not checking wikipedia myself :)

    59. Re:What? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Riding through Utah or Arizona on a motorcycle is no fun. Even further north like Montana can get pretty darn hot. Give me a car with air conditioning, so I can enjoy my cross-country journey in comfort, even when I'm cruising through the middle of a desert.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    60. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the women tend to be old.

      That's where the drunkenness comes into play..

      (how funny, my captcha is 'pumping')

    61. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starfish are certainly fish when I use my knife to shape them into what resembles a fish and then run a barbed hook into their flesh to tow behind my boat so a nasty bigger fish ghosts onto it's ass and tears it to fuckall -- who cares.

      Also about Driveways, if you read Statute law then you'ld discover that a Driveway is secretly public property that anyone can use even if fenced-off. If you don't pave it, then it remains private property because it doesn't have the facade of commerce upon the cornered road below the pavement.

      Parkways, driveways -- are you making this up by picking a misconception'd word that lawyers try to regulate and just add "way" to it as a scrutinized area where conveyance may occur as a regulatable activity?

  2. Iridium? by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very slow and very expensive, but as they have lots of satellites in polar orbit, you just need a clear view of the sky. Maybe use it only where you can't get a cellphone connection.

    1. Re:Iridium? by ArcadeX · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's now something called Iridium Openport, which is a satalite ISDN that's always on, but you have satalite expense. Works well enough the TS Kennedy.

      --
      An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    2. Re:Iridium? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      32kbps, 150MB for a thousand a month, per-minute thereafter. Basic hardware package seems to be around five grand. 3G+Hughesnet would be vastly faster and cheaper for what he wants to do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Iridium? by mytrip · · Score: 2, Informative

      iridium is like $12/megabyte. Way too much.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
    4. Re:Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well if you would provide more information on what part of the US it might help.
      I can say from firsthand experience that if you're going to be traveling in Montana (where I live) you'll rarely find RV parks with internet access (they do exist in some places) and cell coverage is spotty in a great deal of the state. If you're traveling the interstate corridors you could probably get by with 3G coverage, but if you like to hit the back highways and campgrounds, especially once you get into the mountain regions you'll be outside coverage more often than you'll be in. Satellite is going to be your only option in many of those areas.

      I would say you'll probably want to rely mostly on the 3G cell coverage, with a satellite backup, and the rare times you're parked you can piggyback on whatever local wifi you can find. I would also check into someone like Irridium many of the satellite data providers have polar orbit parked comm sats. There's a good bit of Canada that simply has NO other option.
      In any event, the whole "clear view of the southern sky" is a marketing line from the dish TV companies because they don't have many sats and tend to orbit them over the southern US where the bulk of their customers are concentrated. Most satellite data services that are setup to handle more mobile access have sats that are more or less "directly" overhead.

      Good luck to you.

    5. Re:Iridium? by Ant+P. · · Score: 4, Funny

      But it's still cheaper than Verizon!

    6. Re:Iridium? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      To be a little more specific - 2400 baud nominal at approx. $1-1.50/minute for Iridium.

      2G/3G is the OP's best bet without massively deep pockets. One can get some coverage improvement by finding a 3G device that allows for external antennas.

      The Cradlepoint unit the OP mentioned provides no advantage over any other 2G/3G solution.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, since you (and a couple other posters) have no clue of how comsats work, here it is:

      TV sats, Inmarsat, Terrestar, etc.: one or a few birds in equatorial GEO (although polar/inclined GEO is theoretically possible, it makes no sense for comms). These can have a high-gain antenna with a tailored beam pattern to cover only the desired portions of earth';s surface (e.g. TV broadcasts may be aimed only at North America, with no power wasted on South America and the oceans), and you can point a high-gain antenna (almost always a dish) from any spot in that coverage area directly at the satellite, which makes wonderful sense for fixed installations. In mobile operation, however, the greater distance to GEO, compounded with the difficulty of keeping a high-gain antenna pointed at the satellite, makes them less desirable, especially for uplinks.

      GPS, Iridium, Globalstar, etc: multiple (~50) birds in polar and/or inclined LEO orbits. A polar orbit does _not_ leave the bird "parked" over the pole -- it orbits over the whole world, including the poles (where it's practically useless). Putting your entire constellation in polar orbit seems pretty pointless, since the polar region winds up getting covered by every single satellite, but more satellites are required to provide adequate coverage over the rest of the world; however, Iridium adopted this (all orbits are 86deg inclination), probably to ease inter-satellite communications. IIRC most satellites wind up being around 50deg inclination for best coverage. You don't need to know where any particular birds are, but there's always at least one overhead (for all covered areas).

      AFAIK, Iridium, Globalstar, and Orbcomm are the _only_ data/voice networks of this type, not "many" as you suggest. It turns out that, under current launch costs, orbiting one big satellite to GEO to cover most of a hemisphere with really solid bandwidth is much more commercially viable than launching 50 smaller LEO birds, with less bandwidth and loads of relatively wasted coverage. All three companies that have tried it wound up filing for bankruptcy after launch, when they couldn't find enough subscribers at high enough prices to cover the costs incurred.

    8. Re:Iridium? by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      The only issue with that is after like 10km or so away from the tower it will actually REJECT your data packets. Even if you have like a -90 or -80 signal. GSM won't allow you to have data. CDMA on the other hand I believe will. Keep that in mind if you plan on using a large antenna/booster.

    9. Re:Iridium? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      You are sure of this? Can you give some reference material? I would really like to know how or why this is true. I have hit EDGE data over some pretty impressive distances (10 miles) with the proper equipment. I really can't see how the BSS would reject a distant signal if it were good enough. The distances aren't great enough to cause any timing issues.

    10. Re:Iridium? by itwerx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Iridum is a good start. But take that, a generic WIFI card, whatever 3G service you like, and heck, anything else you can think of, and glue it all together with pfSense. Only time you'll have trouble is if you're actually in motion and have a secure connection established (e.g. VPN or SSL), and you lose the active connection, the other end will see you on a different IP and you'll have to re-authenticate. (Oh, did I mention that pfSense is awesome? :)

    11. Re:Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP's talking about a valid concept, but the "10km or so" limit is really about 35km, or 20 miles; it's a timing advance of 63 bits.

      There's some work to enable extended cells that can use two timeslots to gain up to 120km/75mi range, but I'm not sure to what extent this is deployed, or whether typical terminals support it.

      See Wikipedia.

    12. Re:Iridium? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Thank you; very good information here; I didnt realize a station had to reply inside of the same frame. There IS therefore a timing issue but the BSS could counteract it obviously as you said by maintaining an additional frame offset internally. So this explains a 35km limit on GSM itself but do the 3g GSM technologies attempt to pack additional data in by shortening the guard period? If so that would explain a smaller distance limit, but I don't think data would be rejected; seems you'd just fall back to EDGE or GPRS?

  3. Cat V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Big spools of Cat V... it's cheap

    1. Re:Cat V by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      II cats is about the limit for an RV. V cats are too many tails underfoot.

    2. Re:Cat V by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 4, Funny

      and they tend to bother you mouse too.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    3. Re:Cat V by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      You just have to stop every 1000 meters and install a repeater. Probably require some form of solar or wind power system with storage where a local power outlet is not available.

    4. Re:Cat V by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:Cat V by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      100 meters if you are doing Ethernet, that is.

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    6. Re:Cat V by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      Oops, It's been a few years since I had to deal with that.

    7. Re:Cat V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, it gives the one who isn't driving something to do on the road. They can try to split and splice the end of the currently used cable before the spool runs out.

    8. Re:Cat V by Klinky · · Score: 1

      Pfft, Cat VI is faster, just make sure you like the interface...

    9. Re:Cat V by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Pretty good for massive data transfers, but ping times are a bitch...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:Cat V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big spools of Cat V... it's cheap

      It would have to be singlemode fiber because of the distance. :)

  4. Inmarsat by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Inmarsat BGAN performs well however it is pricey for the setup and monthly fee. The advantage is that you can get coverage basically everywhere. There's also setups that allow tie-in for a phone, fax etc.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Inmarsat by DarthBart · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. BGAN gets you 400Kbps of "best effort" service at $6/mb. Or dedicated "streaming" connections that will go up to 256K @ $22/min.

      Thrane & Thrane make a mobile unit that tracks the satellite as you move.

  5. Sprint Mobile Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been using them for almost a year and the speed is OK (~1 M), the latency a bit high (~100ms). It is a 3G wireless card, plugs into a PCMCIA slot. I created a home router, but you can buy one that fits the card. If they ever get their act together, they might bump it up to 4G. All you need is one of their cell towers. And they have a map.

    1. Re:Sprint Mobile Broadband by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      I was about to say that Sprint's coverage in Canada is terribly expensive... but:
      http://www1.sprintpcs.com/explore/ueContent.jsp?scTopic=wirelessData

      I stand pretty well corrected. I had a problem getting a voice plan from Sprint that covered Canada... They had a "service" where if I paid $5 a month, my calls into and from Canada would only cost 11 cents a minute instead of 40 cents... Which is why I had to switch to Verizon... If you're looking for pure data (which it sounds like you are) $100/month doesn't sound terrible if the coverage is good for you.

    2. Re:Sprint Mobile Broadband by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But will it work outside of major metropolitan areas?

      I live in Seattle. Last month I drove out to Yellowstone and camped there for three nights. My G1 (T-Mobile service, of course) had only roaming coverage east of Spokane (Washington). That meant no data access* in Idaho, Montana, or Wyoming. None. Good thing I was always planning on using Streets and Trips on my laptop if necessary and not Google Maps, eh?

      Three years ago I went on a long loop drive that took me as far east as Ohio. I had a Nextel phone at the time. I had no coverage at all east of Spokane (even in Chicago!). I had a work-provided BlackBerry at the time (AT&T coverage, I think) which was more reliable, but I still had to be in a reasonably populated area to get a signal.

      The thing about the US is that in the middle of the continent, populations are *very* spread out. There are many, many areas where there's just no economic incentive to provide cell coverage, because there aren't enough customers to justify it. And that's in regular areas. If you're the National Park Service, are you really going to want telecom companies throwing up cell towers on your land? I was really happy I visited all those places, but it was also a huge eye-opener about how different things are when you get away from the coasts (including the coasts of the Great Lakes).

      * I suppose if you're Daddy Warbucks you might be able to use roaming data coverage, but as I'm not I didn't test whether that actually works or not.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Sprint Mobile Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably verizon mifi. Just see who has the best coverage in the places you plan to go to.
      http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/09/15/sprint-mifi-verizon-mifi-road-tested/

    4. Re:Sprint Mobile Broadband by DaChesserCat · · Score: 1

      I live in a beautiful valley in a rural area in southern Missouri. I used to have an Alltel phone with tethering. I was getting EV-DO at home. When I roamed to other areas (San Antonio, TX and Minneapolis, MN), I could still get data, but it was 1X-CDMA (153 kb/s). It has never affected my phone bill. People visiting us, with AT&T or T-Mobile service, were unable to send or receive text messages, or make or receive calls, while they were here. It was Alltel or nothing. I had very few complaints with them.

      I have, at home, a Cradlepoint MBR-1000 router connected to a Alltel USB-3G module (Pantech UM-150, to be more precise). As it is not roaming, I get full EV-DO Rev A. Data access for the module is about $60/month. If they have a bandwidth cap, they aren't enforcing it. We routinely suck down over 10 GB/month. I have an external antenna, on an external mount, which helps tremendously (a Wilson antenna, acquired from a local truck stop). Without the antenna, I'm lucky if I get 1 bar. With it, I get 4. The connection frequently flirts with 1 Mb/s inbound, with < 100 ms latency. DSL and Cable modem are not an option, at any price, so it is 3G, satellite (horrible latency) or dial-up for us.

      I was very disappointed when Alltel was acquired by Verizon, with which I have had "negative experiences" in the past. I now have a Sprint smartphone (HTC Touch) with Phone as Modem (tethering). It has excellent 3G connectivity when I'm at work. When I go home, I have to roam to Verizon, so I'm back to 1X-CDMA speeds. The tethering is mostly used when I'm away from home, so this isn't such an issue. Roaming typically does NOT affect my phone bill. I haven't completed my 2-year contract on the data module, which is why Verizon is still getting my money on that count.

      My dad is a truck driver. He uses AT&T. He has an external antenna on his rig, which gives him greater range. There are parts of Montana (mountains) and the Dakotas where he has trouble getting a signal. This is particularly true when passing through Native American Reservations in the western US. He doesn't have a data plan.

      My advice: get a data module from Verizon (since their acquisition of Alltel, they do have the largest network), an MBR-1000 and a good external antenna. If you really want to get fancy, buy/build a directional antenna and get used to aiming it (it will be manual; I know of no system for automatically aiming a directional cell antenna; there is a market looking for a solution). There are places where you will not be able to get a signal, but a good antenna will shrink those areas. A signal booster will shrink it further. Verizon has roaming agreements with most other CDMA carriers, so you won't get screwed on your bill from roaming charges.

      Oh, and stay the hell out of Canada. Nothing against Canada or Canadians (Vancouver Island was beautiful, and we met some very nice people on my last trip) but the data roaming rates in Canada are little more than legalized rape. I managed to rack up over $20 in roaming charges just reading one article in LinuxMag on my aformentioned HTC and briefly using Google Maps (with the GPS in the phone) to find our hotel.

      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
    5. Re:Sprint Mobile Broadband by jayteedee · · Score: 1

      Strange that you had problems with Tmobile. I picked them for the 1st couple of years of RVing and had great luck for connectivity, but it was a bit slow. Hardly ever had high speed since I was hardly ever in a big city. I now use a BB with Alltel/Verizon and have much better data rates, and fairly good connectivity, but I think most of it has been attributed to being a few years later. I think most cell phones would work in most areas these days, but you will take a hit on speeds.

      As to satellite reception: Conflicting problems. If you want to always have good line of sight, then you want a separate antenna that takes longer to setup each and every time you move (about 15 min of setup time). If you want convenience then you get a roof mounted unit that sets up pretty quick, but then you will have many occasions where trees will block your satellite view and you can't exactly maneuver the rig to easily to fix the problem. Some people I've heard are putting the sat receiver on the pull or tow vehicle and then using wireless to get into the rig. This gives you about the best of both worlds with sat internet, but there is still the latency issues.

      Oh, and Slashdot is terribly slow over a slow connection.

      --
      Religion and science are both 90% crap..but that doesn't negate the other 10%.
  6. how about by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    netstumbler?

    1. Re:how about by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      What does wardriving do if you need to connect without stopping at every open AP you find?

  7. Priorities by loteck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want constant internet access, you must not go where there is no signal.

    If you want to go enjoy remote places with no signal, you cannot have constant internet coverage.

    Pick one.

    1. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      What kind of blasphemy is this, advocating common sense on Slashdot!?

    2. Re:Priorities by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Funny

      But ... isn't RVing about getting away from it all (while still taking it all with you?)

    3. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RV'ing is about comfortably getting away to places without low overhangs and with the occasional sewage dump site.

    4. Re:Priorities by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah but unfortunately, no matter where you go, there you are.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Priorities by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Funny

      OP doesn't say whether they need constant internet access even while mobile, or if they have the option of releasing a tethered repeater balloon which soars to a height of 10km whenever they've stopped - even a remote place.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go on a trip around the country, vacation time, you can to fun stuff and you want to browse the internet? you can do that while you're on the can at home, for mails and such there are plenty of hotspots or just some internet cafes. Goddamn americans, get your priorities straight.

    7. Re:Priorities by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      As Ioteck mentions, if you rely on cellular internet, you need to remain within cellular range. Cell service in sparsely populated areas (like campgrounds) is pretty poor. My parents regularly get weak or no service when they go on vacation. You should look into getting an external cell repeater, or an access point that accepts external high gain antenna.

    8. Re:Priorities by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a dopey comment, why weigh in at all if your only thought is to accept the limitations of the most obvious off-the-shelf solutions, or nothing at all? The question itself already went far beyond your "coverage/no coverage" false dichotomy by identifying various technologies such as 3g range extenders and satellites that offer various tradeoffs. At the least, somebody with experience using these could weigh in on their utility, or lack thereof.

    9. Re:Priorities by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It sounds like they're not on vacation: they live in their RV full-time, and do their work from there.

    10. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contra to this is some anecdotal evidence about a particular campground at which I recently stayed. There was a U.S. Cellular tower on campground property. While my Verizon Wireless phone was in Roam mode whenever placing or receiving a call, SMS and Mobile Web were available at full-bars.

    11. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents are full-time RVers now. They don't have a cell phone and don't want one.

      You need to define for you and your wife what your budget is. If you have less than $100/month,
      a) get a 3G/Edge card for your laptop (or tether your laptop to your data-capable cell phone) and live with whatever coverage you get.
      b) Only stay at RV parks with Internet
      c) Plan your travels with internet access in mind.

      If you determine you can live with access every other day, you have many options. One option is to drive 50mi to use someone elses internet every other day and another is to use a telephone modem at 28.8Kbps. AT&T DSL plans come with free modem access included.

      The amount of time you need per internet session will determine which of these options will be best. If it is 15 min a day, I can't see drive 50 miles. If it is 2 hours a day, I'd get the 3G data plan and be done.

      Satellite isn't worth considering.

      3G is really very good, when you have coverage. I've used 3G over a work VPN while at home because it was easier than connecting to my home network with 30/8Mbps speeds. Only during file uploads did the 3G show up. Checking email and normal business data access didn't feel any different to me.

    12. Re:Priorities by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      Yeah but unfortunately, no matter where you go, there you are.

      For me this is actually most fortunate, for those around me, well that's different.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    13. Re:Priorities by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wise words. Many places in Canada there is coverage along the major highways, and I think even the transcanada still doesn't have much service at all going over Lake Superior. If you just want to drive across you can probably do fine with 3G, except for some bits that you can rush across in a day or so. If you want to get off the main highway then you're going to need satellite. I expect the less populated parts of the US are similar.

    14. Re:Priorities by ddyer-bennet · · Score: 1

      You're tilting at a straw windmill. The very first word of his subject line is "(NEAR)"; obviously he knows perfectly well he may not be able to reasonably achieve complete access.

    15. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can run, but you can't hide from what's inside of you" - Steely Dan

    16. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't stop the signal!

  8. Let me get this straight by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You say "the intrepid RV'er wants to get remote", but you want to remain in constant internet contact. You claim it's about your business, but you worry about latency's effect on gaming.

    Why exactly are you heading out anywhere? Cuz it sounds to me you're not gonna to see anything that's not reflected in your computer screen...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded +1: Obvious point that really needs to be asked.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, he lives in his Mom's RV's Basement and she likes to travel.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree - why would you be gaming while on a RV trip? This almost like asking how to picnic while snorkeling.

    4. Re:Let me get this straight by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you like fish, preferably sushi.

    5. Re:Let me get this straight by BirdDoggy · · Score: 5, Funny

      His web business is WoW gold farming.

    6. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, you don't think people should want to live somewhere nice just because sometimes they use a computer or watch TV? I can completely see the appeal of being able to go to a beautiful National Park, do some work in the morning, and have the rest of the day to enjoy my surroundings. You don't have to be doing outward bound every time you're in a remote area. I'd like to take off for a few months myself, and I'd be interested in internet access in remote areas too.

    7. Re:Let me get this straight by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      classic

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    8. Re:Let me get this straight by ndege · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      :) +1 funny

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    9. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sashimi, sushi is the rice.

    10. Re:Let me get this straight by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      My mistake. You can tell I don't particularly like either one. :)

    11. Re:Let me get this straight by aclarke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As another self-employed person, I'll ask you what I view as a rhetorical question. If you had to work, would you rather work in your home office in some suburb of some city, or wherever you live, or would you occasionally like to spend a day/week/month working beside a quiet lake in the middle of nowhere, in a crowded foreign beach town, or wherever it is that you would like to head on vacation?

      I go on vacations where I don't take my laptop and don't work, but on the other hand if I want to go somewhere fun and work for a while, what's the problem with that? It's not an either/or situation.

    12. Re:Let me get this straight by Westech · · Score: 1

      Maybe his business IS gaming.

    13. Re:Let me get this straight by ndege · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +1 Insightful

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    14. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard is cracking down hard on those gold farmers so now, like pirate radio stations, they must stay mobile.

    15. Re:Let me get this straight by starglider29a · · Score: 1

      He's in a hole somewhere until 12/24/2012. I wouldn't admit to it either.

    16. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever had to do anything in an SSH session more than check mail over a high latency connection? Probably have to add a VPN in there for ever so slightly more of a delay.

      Yes, I know the poster mentioned gaming, but there is more than one reason to want low latency.

    17. Re:Let me get this straight by oldhack · · Score: 1

      True. "Basement" is a state of mind.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    18. Re:Let me get this straight by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Shhhh... Your insulting the American ideal of "productivity", science has shown that the more you enjoy your life, the more likely you are to be a hell bound sinner. Oh wait... that was Calvin, not science.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    19. Re:Let me get this straight by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      If it is for business, then you can probably live with the latency of satellite. I lived with DirecWay for three years, and survived just fine. It worked very well for me; despite usage caps and limited upload speed, it was a good solution, far better than anything else that was out there.

      The standard hardware isn't that expensive; auto-pointing RV-top units are indeed thousands. If you don't mind some manual labour, it is possible to set up and point the cheap default hardware on a tripod (weighted with sandbags, etc.), or on a mount on your RV (taking it off when moving).

      Technically you're not supposed to be pointing these things unless you're a qualified tech, but I've done it many a time, and it's not that hard once you learn how. (The thing isn't going to transmit until it's locked on the proper receiving carrier, so you're not going to be taking out other satellites by mistake; you'll just not get a usable system if you fail to point it well.)

      So if you're willing to pack up/deploy the dish every time your RV moves and you want internet at your new location, it is a relatively cheap and effective means for accomplishing this. If you were staying at places a week at a time, it might be a good route for you. If you're moving daily, it might be too much work.

      Depending upon your intended routes, 3G with a nationwide carrier is a good option, too; I like the total independence that satellite gives you, though.

      Despite living in a modest cottage, when Hurricane Juan hit, I was living pretty good with my generator, satellite internet, propane-heated water :) People came to my place to use the Internet and get a shower.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  9. freak by joejor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    most people (ie, non-slashdotters) take the RV to get away from the constant barrage of tech and telecom, to see sights not (web)sites, to look out the window and not at Windows.

    1. Re:freak by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Right. I happen to like to vacation to the Terminal. @Author: So you want to vacation away with the world and simultaneously be in instant contact with it? Tough to do.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    2. Re:freak by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People use a piece of technology to get away from all the technology and then wonder why it isn't working...

    3. Re:freak by Torontoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a bit harsh. Often RV'ers are gone for long periods of time. I know someone who spends his winters RVing in Mexico. he runs a business and needs to also be in touch with people regularly.

    4. Re:freak by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are being an asshole. A lot of people are losing their houses (or leaving them voluntarily ahead of someone making the decision for them, which is an unusually mature choice these days) and moving into an RV right now. Beats moving back in with your diaper-wearing parents. If you don't have any kids and are willing to get rid of all that crap you never take out of boxes anyway, it could even be fun.

      I'm planning on getting a truck camper to go with my 1992 F250 4x4 Super Cab Diesel with 4" lift (but first I have to stop it from exhibiting the wobble of death) along with a nice titan guard winch bumper. RV into the boonies for sure... I don't feel the need to have internet every step of the way, though.

      (And to those who say that anywhere you can reach by vehicle isn't remote enough, I have a mountain bike, and a big hiking backpack. But I see the vehicle as part of the expeditionary package.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:freak by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this guys goals might be more inline with the other subset of RV's. The subset where its more about being able showing off your bigger toys (and thus your superiority) to as many strangers as possible. I think my grandparents were getting sucked into that group, until they escaped (probably didn't have enough money to compete.) They used to drive around to campsites with their co-competitors, and rarely leave the glow of the TV/etc.

    6. Re:freak by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "A lot of people are losing their houses (or leaving them voluntarily ahead of someone making the decision for them, which is an unusually mature choice these days) and moving into an RV right now."

      Irrelevant - if they are moving into an RV simply to avoid being homeless, then they'd better not be taking vacations to remote areas with no cell coverage.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:freak by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant - if they are moving into an RV simply to avoid being homeless, then they'd better not be taking vacations to remote areas with no cell coverage.

      Or job prospects...

    8. Re:freak by igibo · · Score: 0

      You inconsiderate CLOD! I'm a diaper-wearing parent!

    9. Re:freak by value_added · · Score: 1

      Often RV'ers are gone for long periods of time.

      Matthew McConaughey apparently spends most of the year doing just that.

      He's claimed on several talk shows that it's "tricked out" with lots of communications gear. Hardly a geek's role model, but I'd like to think the article submitter may be able to find lots on Google given his celebrity status.

    10. Re:freak by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      most people (ie, non-slashdotters) take the RV to get away from the constant barrage of tech and telecom, to see sights not (web)sites, to look out the window and not at Windows.

      slashdotters don't see sights on Windows they prefer KDE or Gnome

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    11. Re:freak by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Regularly is one thing. I like having an iPhone that can get my e-mail every few days when I hit some coverage. The "daily connectivity" the poster wants is going to limit where he can go unless he takes a sat phone along.

    12. Re:freak by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      most people (ie, non-slashdotters) take the RV to get away from the constant barrage of tech and telecom, to see sights not (web)sites, to look out the window and not at Windows.

      Some of those people like to photograph, write, and otherwise document it too. Even when camping or hiking I like bringing my camera with me. When I was in the army my commanding officer made me the unit's photographer because no matter where we went to out in the field, my military occupation specialty or MOS was small arms specialist or infantry, I always took my camera. We didn't have laptops or the web then but with them and a digital camera I could go crazy shooting pictures and uploading them. Once the unit went to an Army base in Alaska for winter warfare training for 3 weeks. I took 11 rolls of film, 4 rolls of black and white film with 24 exposures the CO gave me and 7 rolls of 36 exposure colour film. I shot every shot before the first week was over. I could fill up drives for digital camera faster.

      Or I could take my camera with me scuba diving, which I also love doing. I could go under water and fill up my storage, then upload the photos to a server before back in the water.

      Quite simply, just because you may not think of a use for wireless access out in the middle of nowhere doesn't mean there aren't good reasons to have it. Another use for wireless access is medical, in an accident a paramedic could record and upload vital life signs among other things.

      Falcon

    13. Re:freak by Omestes · · Score: 1

      No offense... but shouldn't selection play a roll? Just because you take 8000 pictures, doesn't mean you need to upload 8000 pictures, or that anyone really cares about 95% of them (if that isn't the point then why upload them?). Granted, my life isn't quite as exciting as yours, I spend tons of time deep in the wilderness of the southwest (without much cell coverage), I also am a technophile and photo buff (not very good, but I try), but also don't mind the lack of connectivity, I actually find it somewhat refreshing. I am also sure that most of my friends like it as well, since it gives me time to select only the pictures that I like.

      I'm not insulting your preferences, I'm just questioning the universality of them. Pictures (and blogs, surprisingly enough) benefit then most from not being able to harbor your "post it" influences.

      I am a rarity though, since I don't mind escaping the internet for long periods, and often find it refreshing. I lately came back from a week or so vacation to Washington, where I purposely chose not to bring my laptop, or access the internet in any serious way. Obviously this was for pleasure, so your business needs might trump this. When I go prospecting in the deep desert of AZ, the lack of internet and cell access is mostly a plus, as well. Though some emergency service would be nice, especially since CD emergency channels are largely abandoned.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  10. Both by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

    Get a 3G and a satellite. When you're within range of a cell tower (which is almost everywhere, these days) you get the high speeds you want. Outside, you still have basic Internet connectivity via the satellite.

    Or give it 20 years and I can almost guarantee you that you'll be able to pick up a high-speed, low-latency connection from anywhere on the continent.

    1. Re:Both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "almost everywhere" vastly overstates 3g coverage. I drove from Georgia to Colorado this summer and there were huge parts of Kansas and Nebraska that didn't even have cell service, much less 3G. There are significant portions of the US and even more in Canada that are less densely populated than Kansas.

    2. Re:Both by Omestes · · Score: 1

      When you're within range of a cell tower (which is almost everywhere, these days) you get the high speeds you want.

      Your idea of almost everywhere is severely limited. There is vast tracks of America with spotty or non-existent access to even basic cell usage. This is true in vast swaths of the southwest, thanks to LOS problems, and from my experience other parts of the west and midwest thanks to density issues. The East coast, and southern/central California might not suffer this, but the US is a HUGE place.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  11. 3G zoom by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    My parents used a 3G card while driving around the country, but it had a built-in antenna. I'd look for a 3G device with an antenna jack and connect it to a directional antenna on the roof. There are rotating TV antenna devices for RVs which could be altered to hold a suitable directional antenna. Or might an RV satellite dish mount be adaptable to focus on a 3G antenna?

    1. Re:3G zoom by Nerdposeur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Airlink Ravens are cellular modems with Ethernet jacks. You can attach any kind of antenna you want to it - mount it on the roof if you like. Run the signal you get through a cellular amplifier and that's about as good as you can ask for in the cellular world.

  12. By myself by charlyb13 · · Score: 1

    Have you heard about 4G - this is very interesting thing.

    1. Re:By myself by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      Psft... I have been using 5G for years now.

    2. Re:By myself by Raghead · · Score: 1

      Hah! My G goes all the way up to 11!

  13. You ask the impossible by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't want to use satellite and you say cellular coverage isn't good enough. What exactly are you expecting? If there's no connectivity, there's no connectivity. No amount of homebrew can fix that.

    You also seem confused by WiFi In Motion and Cradlepoint products. They don't amplify anything, they're just access points that you can plug your phone in to get wifi coverage. A laptop and a router can do the same thing.

    You have two choices:

    1) Pony up the dough for satellite coverage
    2) Get a cellular data plan and live with no connectivity in dead zones

    I don't believe there are any other alternatives.

    1. Re:You ask the impossible by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

      He could become a ham radio operator and use his home base as an internet proxy server. I don't know what the latency would be, but I would guess it would be better than satellite.

    2. Re:You ask the impossible by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You also seem confused by WiFi In Motion and Cradlepoint products.

      I believe you are confused about WiFi In Motion's product. From thier FAQ:

      What is WiFi In Motion? WiFi In Motion is a packaged wireless Internet access solution that includes a high-gain antenna, a 3-watt amplifier, a 3G mobile router, and all the accessories you need to create your own hot spot.

      http://www.wifiinmotion.com/frequently-asked-questions

      I however don't know if cradlepoint's device amplifies or not as they have no FAQ I can easily find on their website.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:You ask the impossible by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, there is always RFC 1149

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:You ask the impossible by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      You know what's even more funny? He claims to have a degree in electrical engineering!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm wrong, but won't the FCC be on your ass for transmitting 802.11 @ 3W? I thought the max transmission power for 2.4ghz stuff was 200mW?

    6. Re:You ask the impossible by Cato · · Score: 2, Informative

      WiFi in Motion does include a 3 watt amplifier and a high gain antenna, so it should get 3G signal at longer ranges than a normal mobile phone. However, it's not a panacea - satellite is the only way to get really complete coverage everywhere.

    7. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it back to the 1990's:

      He could get several cellphones with voice access everywhere and use dialup connections via acoustic couplers. Would be a good fallback to 3g not working.

    8. Re:You ask the impossible by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      That true, but without enough effort he can really minimize his dead spots:

      1. Get a 3G modem with the little connector for an external antenna. Buy the best antenna you can afford. See if you can mount it on top of the RV or at least out the window.

      2. If he has enough money he should get a 3G modem from both AT&T and Sprint. Or whoever has the most difference in coverage. One may work somewhere the other doesnt. EVDO and 3G are on different frequencies too.

      3. Get a wireless router, put dd.wrt and put it in gateway more. Get yourself a nice directional antenna and see if you can get on someone's wifi from far away.

      4. Sat as a last resort.

      5. Use those coverage maps to your advantage. Dont go to parks that no one covers.

      Could be doable.

    9. Re:You ask the impossible by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      That was amusing, I hope you get modded up. Slashdot covered that a day or two ago, didn't it?

    10. Re:You ask the impossible by TakeyMcTaker · · Score: 1

      You have two choices:

      1) Pony up the dough for satellite coverage
      2) Get a cellular data plan and live with no connectivity in dead zones

      You missed "all of the above".

      More seriously, Multi-WAN firewalls are relatively cheap now. If you know Linux or BSD you can probably configure a custom Multi-WAN router on a CULV PC. If you have the money for an RV and still want constant access, why not buy and mix all available forms? Use the WifiInMotion or another amplifier+Cradlepoint alike option to maximize cellular data range. Use an amplified directional WiFi antenna (the Internets are full of DIY parabolic and cantenna designs) with some netstumbler software to search out WiFi connections wherever you go. Use a satellite service as a fail-over or backup WAN. If you buy a pay-per-bit type satellite service, definitely define rules to only use that connection when none of the other connection have ping. If you have the means, buy multiple cell data services on different 3/3.5/4G network types, as they have different ranges and coverage areas.

    11. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes; but ham radio cannot be used for business or commercial purposes.

      Furthermore, if he's more than 100 miles from his house, chances are all he could get would be 1200 baud to his home, if even that. {Yes 1200 baud; not even 14.4k modem levels.}

    12. Re:You ask the impossible by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      1) arrange for a partner to drive a car with you.
      2) Put a really big antenna on the car and on the RV
      3) Park the car in Starbuck's parking lot, leeching off their WiFi
      4) Explore the countryside in the RV, within a 237 mile radius of the car.
      5) Pack up the car and move to the next starbucks.

    13. Re:You ask the impossible by ericrost · · Score: 1

      By definition unless he was 22236 miles from home (geosync orbit) he would likely get a factor or 20 improvement anywhere in the continental us.

    14. Re:You ask the impossible by mr.bri · · Score: 1

      What's great about all of this is that in 20 years, this will be easy. And a silly question.

      But for now, yes..... [nearly] Impossible.

    15. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't do business using HAM radio frequencies. You can do internet at 9600 anywhere in the world but it is illegal to do it with a pecuniary interest.

    16. Re:You ask the impossible by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Closer to a decade ago. Hope you got a good deal on that UID.

    17. Re:You ask the impossible by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Not all communications satellites are in geosync orbit. Iridium satellites are in LEO and rely on the fact that there are a ton of them up there. The ground-based device just hops between them as necessary (not a particularly new thing since that's what all cell phones already do, of course).

    18. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem - Amateur (ham) radio operators aren't allowed to use their rigs for business - only "amateur" (i.e. fun) purposes are allowed.

    19. Re:You ask the impossible by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      He could become a ham radio operator and use his home base as an internet proxy server.

      Too bad he wanted this for work, because it is against FCC regulation to use the amateur band for commercial uses. Besides, the latency would most likely be worse than satellite and the downlink speeds would be much slower.

      Not to mention, being out in the middle of nowhere usually means being out of UHF+ range of the nearest packet station.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    20. Re:You ask the impossible by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      It was covered a week ago and 5 days ago, they were testing if RFC 1149 was faster than South Africa's largest telecom's broadband, turns out it was.

      Don't be a dick unless you're 100% positive you're right, even then, google it just to make sure.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    21. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Ham Radio? At what frequency band pray-tell?

    22. Re:You ask the impossible by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Serious question -- who is to say this is for business purposes? Using ham radio to get internet access everywhere sounds like a pretty fun geek hobby experiment to me. If he were to get it working, wouldn't that be fun? And is anyone really going to complain that he checked his work email with it? Just how strict are these laws?

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    23. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legally, no he could not. the U.S. ham bands are not for commercial purposes. Also, any encryption (likely if you want to conduct buisiness) is forbidden on the ham bands. It's just not the right tool for this job.

    24. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might work, except that he wants to run his web business over this link. Business communications over amateur radio are prohibited per section 97.113 of the US amateur radio rules:

      http://www.ncvec.org/page.php?id=121

    25. Re:You ask the impossible by cruff · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anything related to the RVer's business is explicitly prohibited by the FCC on the amateur bands.

    26. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ham radio is not the answer for this. The higher the frequency the more that line of sight comes into play. So, unless you are using a satellite or a really high hill, the higher the frequency, the shorter distance that the signal can travel. The lower the frequency the slower the connection. When you get 50 miles out, it's really not usable for anything more than email (again, unless your home is on a tall hill). I wouldn't send a large email at those speeds either. Then... there's the kicker. The FCC doesn't allow you to encrypt ham communications. Forget a web page with SSL (at least legally). Latency is the least of your problems.

    27. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately ham radio can not be used for business purposes

    28. Re:You ask the impossible by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its not normally within the rules for an amateur service to compete with commercial services.

    29. Re:You ask the impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if he does, he's going to get his license yanked again. Doing business over an amateur radio link involves 'a pecuniary interest' and is unlawful.

      KG6IIM

    30. Re:You ask the impossible by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't want to use satellite and you say cellular coverage isn't good enough. What exactly are you expecting? If there's no connectivity, there's no connectivity. No amount of homebrew can fix that.

      It's only impossible until someone does it. Take almost everything you take for granted now back 200 years and you may find yourself accused of witchcraft. Radio wasn't thought possible until Tesla came along, or TV with Philo Farnsworth.

      Falcon

    31. Re:You ask the impossible by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Its not normally within the rules for an amateur service to compete with commercial services.

      It may not be in the rules but there is no reason a private person should be prevented from doing so. The only reason the airwaves and radio transmissions were licensed was because big businesses, the mass media, wanted it that way. How many billions of dollars did the FCC ask for for the frequencies that were being freed with the switch to digital TV?

      Falcon

    32. Re:You ask the impossible by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its not normally within the rules for an amateur service to compete with commercial services.

      It may not be in the rules but there is no reason a private person should be prevented from doing so. The only reason the airwaves and radio transmissions were licensed was because big businesses, the mass media, wanted it that way. How many billions of dollars did the FCC ask for for the frequencies that were being freed with the switch to digital TV?

      Falcon

      Because amateur radio bands are narrow and would be quickly swamped by commercial traffic. If you want to piss somebody off by using their frequencies I suggest you co-opt analog TV channels.

    33. Re:You ask the impossible by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      3) Park the car in Starbuck's parking lot, leeching off their WiFi

      The girlfriend and I tried that a couple years ago at a Starbucks' in Vegas. All I could get was a page asking for my credit card number so I could pay 5 bucks for half an hour's connection. So much for 'leeching'.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    34. Re:You ask the impossible by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yep! His options are, more or less:

      * satellite ($$$)
      * packet radio via home proxy (going to be a bit difficult and reliable
      * 3G with an antenna (GSM and/or CDMA - he's get slightly more universal coverage if he used them both. Realistically you'll get "good enough" coverage with an antenna and/or amplifier.)
      * leeching (unethical and unlikely in an RV situation)
      * nothing

      My recommendation: either stick with a cell phone modem or get a tent and kick the Internet addiction. Seriously.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    35. Re:You ask the impossible by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It amazes me that a dozen people posted this (oddly all getting modded up instead of redundant) when there is pretty much zero chance the FCC would ever know the content of the emails he sends with his laptop.

      I've noticed that there are WAY too many mr. fcc ham radio operators who go out of their way to inform on their neighbors and rain on the parade of anyone making a minor technical violation of the rules.

      Its against the rules for me to cross the road without a crosswalk too but I'll be damned if I don't cross wherever it is convenient and there is a break in the flow of traffic. It feels so good to be so bad.

    36. Re:You ask the impossible by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I don't blame the last remaining HAM folk, though. Its a small badwidth, and its a community. Why allow a single moron use it for illegal reasons, you only open the door for more morons.

      I am not a HAM person either, nor do I have any desire to be one.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    37. Re:You ask the impossible by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hope you got a good deal on that UID.

      Considering that it was free, yes. I didn't log into slashdot much then, I spent too much time playing Quake, maintaining a web site about Quake, and working and raising a family. I lost my password from disuse, and got it back by writing help@slashdot.org and supplying my old long gone email address.

      BTW, my user name matches my meatspace name. Good luck buying a user name that matches your meatspace name, mr. maxipad.

    38. Re:You ask the impossible by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I don't actually expect AC to even see me respond to this, but I don't believe it is 802.11 that is being amplified at all, what would be the point of that? This device is designed to provide a cell modem connection to multiple computers withing a boat or RV, not exactly a large area unless you are quite rich. Most likely, they are amplifying the cell phone connection to 3W in order to better access the network.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    39. Re:You ask the impossible by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Ack, typos kill, really

      s/whithing/within

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    40. Re:You ask the impossible by skarphace · · Score: 1

      Since you were the first to mention EvDO, I'll second that. We setup a specialty bus for a tour around the country. This included 20 laptops in the bus for demonstrations. So we got an EvDO modem and a couple antennas mounted on the roof. Hook that up to a plain old router and wifi AP, you've got mobile wifi. Tolerable speed and can be used wherever you get cell signal.

      Just be very careful with data usage. Watching netflix will end up costing you thousands per month. Also, the equipment could cost you up to about $1k.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
  14. Well... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    You might want to get a Starbucks gold card as a fall back plan. It costs $25/year. You can get 2 hours of wifi at any starbucks with it per day. (I don't work for Starbucks and I don't own any of their stock).

    1. Re:Well... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Screw Starbucks, any public library and many other establishments have FRE wifi. Hell, the bar I go to has wifi, and almost all its patrons are construction workers who don't even have computers, let alone laptops. I've never seen anybody in there use the wifi. McDonald's (at least the one on 6th street) has free wifi.

      Do you pay for your air?

    2. Re:Well... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      FYI, bars have free wifi for 1 thing...fantasy drafts.

    3. Re:Well... by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      (I don't work for Starbucks and I don't own any of their stock).

      It sounds like you have a vested interest in their continuing ability to provide coffee and WIFI. Or perhaps the interest is in the reverse order.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    4. Re:Well... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      interesting, I'm pretty sure that is why the have stages and poles too

  15. INMARSAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the cheapest or the fastest, but proven technology.

  16. The easiest solution by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Product requirements;

    - Decent latency
    - Decent bandwidth
    - Available everywhere
    - Reliable

    Solution; none. There is no product out there that will meet all four requirements.

    It now falls to you to decide what your priority is. Given that you need to stay in contact because of business concerns, I'd guess you'd make the following priorities

    1) Reliable
    2) Low latency for voip purposes
    3) Enough bandwidth for voip/email/image uploads
    4) Available everywhere.

    If that's the case, then the obvious answer is to simply NOT travel anywhere without 3g coverage. No other solution you are going to find will match your requirements otherwise.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or satellite phone + internet... somes offer both.
      You'll get your Phone + Internet "everywhere"... but latency will be there

    2. Re:The easiest solution by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

      You forgot inexpensive, as the submitter dismisses satellite for that reason.

      I use a Thuraya handset when I am in the bush and it has worked the few times I've needed it, as long as it wasn't under a heavy jungle canopy.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAD LINK - avast goes crazy at thuraya.com

    4. Re:The easiest solution by speed+of+lightx2 · · Score: 1

      Product requirements;

      - Decent latency

      - Decent bandwidth

      - Available everywhere

      - Reliable

      Solution; none.

      (Almost) not true. There is an experimental product that satisfies all of the above:

      http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090909/wr_nm/us_safrica_pigeon

      In South Africa, it was recently shown that it provides faster data rates than Telkom (major South Africa telecom):

      http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090909/wr_nm/us_safrica_pigeon

    5. Re:The easiest solution by speed+of+lightx2 · · Score: 1
      sorry about that, the product I meant to slashvertise is:

      http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html

    6. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avast has detected a trojan on your Thuraya link...

    7. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I ran into the same problem.

      I tried the satelite (xplorenet) for a year. It works but you need too be stopped and fuss with a tripod and aiming the dish. The quality of service is marginal and it gets worse with time unless you complain loudly. But it does work anywhere and anytime. And if the internet access has any economic value to you, the price is really not that bad.

      However if you want free, I would seriously consider a simple wifi setup with a 24db dish. I have tried this and it is amazing how often an unsecured wifi signal is available, even in what appears to be the middle of nowhere. The dish will allow you to connect to routers that are miles away, as long as you have line of sight. And you can get a dish and router online for about $200. You still need a tripod but the aiming is not as critical. The tech part is no more difficult than hooking up a wireless home computer.

    8. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAD LINK - avast goes crazy at thuraya.com

      Sucks to be a wind'ohs luser, eh? :)

    9. Re:The easiest solution by simpsone · · Score: 1

      Regarding point 2, low latency is not a requisite for VoiP. We've got a lot of customers running VoiP lines off of satellite connections.

    10. Re:The easiest solution by westlake · · Score: 1
      2) Low latency for voip purposes

      It implies a step back in time. But you can probably live with the latency of satellite VoIP. It might even keep you off the phone long enough to enjoy that once-in-a-lifetime RV adventure with your kids.

    11. Re:The easiest solution by ouachiski · · Score: 1

      Actualy you can get the latency on satellite down low enough to make very good voice calls, but you have to spend the money on it. On a daily basis I deal with satellite remotes that have latencies less than 500 ms and phone calls are very clear. A provider with a iDirect system implemented with voice as high priority will see these low latencies.

      --
      sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
    12. Re:The easiest solution by Nithendil · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is a false positive but my antivirus (avast) stated that website tried to download a tojan, for those crazy slashdotters who run windows without antivirus.

    13. Re:The easiest solution by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      And don't go to Canada. Last time I drove apart (in March) it wasn't possible to make it across with 3G every night, never mind go anywhere interesting. Outside the cities there are a lot of places that have just edge, whatever is slower than edge, or nothing.

    14. Re:The easiest solution by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      Avast reports a trojan on that site, looks like a drive-by: HTML:Illiframe-B [Trj].

    15. Re:The easiest solution by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Depends on the customer's expectation. For most of my customers, any latency over 250ms is considered unacceptable.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    16. Re:The easiest solution by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

      Thuraya is $2500/month for unlimited usage. 144 kbps. All you need to do is couple 10 or so of these together and you'll have a nice connection (albeit, with fairly high latency). I think it only works in Europe, Western Asia, and Africa.

  17. amplified yagi antenna + WLAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say your best bet (short of sattellites with their insane latency) is to get yourself a mobile broadband card or router, and get yourself a really nice antenna on the top of your RV. A good directional yagi can provide a massive signal boost, and if you point it towards the nearest town or highway, i'd be willing to bet you close in your grey areas by quite a bit. And its a fairly cheap solution, at least compared to irridium and company.

    The downside, of course, is that you need to be stationary and actually point the antenna at each location... but an intrepid RVer such as yourself wont have any qualms climbing up to your roof and aiming an antenna, right?

  18. RFC 1149 by milgr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Implementable anywhere an RV can go. Latency leaves something to be desired.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:RFC 1149 by toppings · · Score: 1

      Course, you may suffer high packet loss near overpasses.

    2. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid.

    3. Re:RFC 1149 by shakezula · · Score: 3, Informative

      Very well said...too bad the folks who mod'd this informative didn't read what RFC 1149 actually is.

      --
      I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    4. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should be moderated +5 funny?

    5. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? not funny?

    6. Re:RFC 1149 by skeenan · · Score: 0

      well, yes latency is high, but with the right packet size, overall throughput could be quite high! http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-257064.html

    7. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or wind farms.

    8. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but it will take years for it to get standardized.

    9. Re:RFC 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least then the internet predators will eat your actual packets, and not your children.

  19. Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    intrepid RV'er

    I may have a different definition of "intrepid" than you but to me there's nothing intrepid about any location you reach by road unless you're talking about hostile countries or might-wake-up-without-your-kidney parts of Mexico. Especially if you're on your laptop having a conference call while your TV dinners cook inside the RV.

    Do yourself a favor and get out of the position where your business can't function without you. If you have you have to be a single point of failure I'm sorry you picked that profession in life and it's great that you make twice what I make but I would not trade places. If you want something moderately challenging then leave at home all your electronics and canoe/portage 50 miles into the Boundary Waters Canoe Area for an intrepid vacation. Trust me, to see land so pristine was a near religious experience and I definitely went back.

    Go white water rafting or mountain hiking or get dive certified. I'm sorry if your health doesn't permit this but I personally don't find anything intrepid about a recreational vehicle.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  20. Internet and Camping mutually exclusive by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 1

    As one who has just returned from camping, Mammoth Caves NP and Blue Ridge, I can say that cell service is most definitely ubiquitous, neither are Star Bucks. We did find one coffee shop with free WiFi. Of course we weren't looking very hard. About the only thing I needed my laptop for was storage for my camera cards. Leave the internet at home, it WILL be there when you get back. BTW, ditch the RV too much more of an adventure in a tent.

    --
    Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
    1. Re:Internet and Camping mutually exclusive by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      BTW, ditch the RV too much more of an adventure in a tent.

      At my age, tent camping just doesn't happen anymore (late 50's). Lowest tech I'll go is a teardrop camper. But if I was going to live in my Condor RV, I'd want to gut it and rebuild it first...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:Internet and Camping mutually exclusive by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      ditch the RV too much more of an adventure in a tent.

      Why stop there? Why not leave the tent behind too. I'd rather leave that behind than my camera equipment or laptop.

      Falcon

    3. Re:Internet and Camping mutually exclusive by really? · · Score: 1

      > Leave the internet at home, it WILL be there when you get back.

      My RV _is_ my home.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  21. Not many options by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

    I will have to continue the trend of most posters and say none. If you are wanting just basic connection to load a page or two in a browser, you can do satellite in the places where 3G is no an option, but if you need things like VoIP and gaming, then forget it. Even over 3G the latency is too high for gaming unless you are playing some turn-based RPG. VoIP might be ok as long as you turn up the compression on the codec, but over all I think your best option is to either stay put, or stop frequently to plug in your laptop to a wired network.

    --
    Loading...
  22. 3G with Repeater. by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    It won't give you 100% completely continuous coverage, but in areas where there is even weak 3G coverage outdoors but just not inside the RV, you could use a repeater. That allows you to put a really big antenna outside (it can even be directional) and the unit acts as a small local cell tower giving you full bars inside the RV.

    Of course, if you go outside of 3G coverage, your phone will fall back to an older technology which is slower, and if you get out of data areas altogether you're screwed. However, you can supplement this in a lot of areas - many parks now offer WiFi.

    I use a repeater at my house because, while I have half-decent signal outside, I have an aluminum-sided house and inside there's no signal whatsoever. I just use the included el cheapo antenna, but you can add some really powerful receiving antennas for some extra dough. My repeater cost about $300, and is a ZyXel unit, but Wilson and several other companies make various iterations of them with various antenna designs.

    You'll still have to stick to at least fringe areas where signal is actually available, but it would significantly increase your range at least. Short of satellite, which you've already said you don't want, that's about it at the moment.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    1. Re:3G with Repeater. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Even if you're out of data range, if you can get a cell signal you might be able to make a dial up connection. I get about 9.6-14.4kbps speeds on my Verizon phone via dial up; painful, but better than nothing and ok for email and some browsing. I'd maybe get something like a Boost pay as you go phone if your main phone is on a different network.

    2. Re:3G with Repeater. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I use a repeater at my house because, while I have half-decent signal outside, I have an aluminum-sided house and inside there's no signal whatsoever."

      Yes yes be that as it may, a side benefit is to stop our mind control rays. We know your kind. Expect visitors wearing black suits at 8:00PST tonight.

    3. Re:3G with Repeater. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do it. These things are technically illegal and if you point a Yagi at your iPhone it will get real desensed real fast.

    4. Re:3G with Repeater. by Buybye · · Score: 1

      I am a full time RV person. I agree on the repeater. When I don't need that much power, I have an external antenna that attaches to my Verizon dongle, it will set you back $25 and has suction cups to hold it to the window. Take a look at www.solidsignal.com for a variety of repeater products. It will allow a better signal in the fringe areas. I also advise a small generator. I carry a Honda that will run 15 hrs on 1 gal of gas. I just spent 2 days in a valley that had no cell, or TV signals. These places do exist and usually are some of the most beautiful parts of this country. My solution? Load up the laptop and generator for a trip to the nearest town.

    5. Re:3G with Repeater. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if you're talking about a 3G repeater or a WiFi repeater. Either way, both ideas are dumb.

      3G HSPA is currently in a phase of development which will see faster speeds released as time passes by. A full signal repeater will limit the potential speeds.

      Seems easier to slap on a 3G antenna to the 3G modem. CountryBroadband.com.au claim it works for upto 4x the standard range, with the Optus 3G network in Australia.

      This talk of Iridium ISDN above, also seems dumb. I'm not sure of American offers but "Go Bush" offer something much faster than ISDN. Although the latency is still pathetic and the cost is still huge.

  23. random comments by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2-way sat modems are very tricky to set up the dish. You can't just point them with a compass and azimuth guess like you do with DBS...you have to get feedback about how well the satellite is receiving your uplink. And if you do get it pointed correctly, every time you walk around the RV you'll move the dish a little bit and lose the uplink. Also, the "flat" dishes you see on top of escalades that work in motion are receive only. You cannot use a 2-way sat modem while in motion, period.

    I think 3G is your best bet. I'd go with a cradlepoint and have a tetherable 3G phone (on a different network) as a backup. ( Possibly, you can plug two different providers' USB modems into the same cradlepoint and make handoffs seamless; you'd have to ask them to be sure.)

    If you can park near someplace near civilization you'll probably spot an open wifi in about 30 seconds.

    Final thing is if you're running a web-based business and can afford an RV and 3G phones and stuff, perhaps you can afford some employees to run the business for you while you go on an actual vacation.

    1. Re:random comments by Cryogenic+Specter · · Score: 1

      You are right that you can not take a Direcway or HughesNet satellite dish and set it up on your own, but Ground Control and other companies make mobile satellite solutions that will locate the satellite and do all of the setup without your help. They even have an in motion solution. If you are going to be remote, this is the only real solution but it is pretty expensive. There is lag, but the connection is fast when it is constant. I would combine this and 3g from ATT and 3g from Verizon. I would include Verizon because I have found that ATT does not work too well in remote places of the pacific north west like Montana, but it really depends on where you are going.

    2. Re:random comments by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Final thing is if you're running a web-based business and can afford an RV and 3G phones and stuff, perhaps you can afford some employees to run the business for you while you go on an actual vacation.

      As another post said above I'd rather be able to take off for a week once a month but still be in contact than take a 2 week vacation. And in my case I would combine the two, I love photography as well as hiking. With broadband wireless I could upload my photographs while out in the field. Here are some hiking blogs. I bet at least some of them would like to be able to blog while hiking.

      Falcon

    3. Re:random comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem,

      http://www.qualcomm.com/products_services/mobile_content_services/enterprise/assetmanagement/omnitracs.html

    4. Re:random comments by tadheckaman · · Score: 1

      2-way sat modems are very tricky to set up the dish. You can't just point them with a compass and azimuth guess like you do with DBS...you have to get feedback about how well the satellite is receiving your uplink. And if you do get it pointed correctly, every time you walk around the RV you'll move the dish a little bit and lose the uplink. Also, the "flat" dishes you see on top of escalades that work in motion are receive only. You cannot use a 2-way sat modem while in motion, period.

      Inmarsat has some neat solutions to handle the constant motion of ships, which are always shifting slightly and rocking in the water... It involves a fancy dish/panel that is aimed at the correct satellite, and as the ship moves, turns, or otherwise changes its position, this little panel will go up and down and turn to remain aimed at the satellite. I believe you can get ISDN speeds and/or 2 concurrent phone calls with it.

      Another solution I've seen is what the Red Cross uses for internet on their Emergency Communications Response Vehicle ... they have a dish that collapses down when moving, and when stationary it can be up and running within minutes I believe. Link about the ECRV:

      http://ecrv4712.org/

      --
      My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
  24. Cat6 by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    You just need really long cord, and plenty of repeaters.

  25. Amp your signal by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    It won't help if there's NO signal, but in weak signal areas, signal boosting equipment can give you better cellular reception.

    I work in the cellular industry, and Wilson Electronics' stuff is well-respected.

    Disclosure: my company is a dealer. We have been told by carrier engineers that the carrier itself recommends and uses this equipment, though. And notice that I'm not giving you a link to our site.

    This kind of equipment is expensive - somewhere around the $600 range - but you can get one setup that will work simultaneously for AT&T, Verizon and Sprint (and probably others), because it depends on frequency, not encoding. And of course it's a one-time purchase, not an extra monthly fee.

    1. Re:Amp your signal by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      Also - yes, Cradlepoint makes good routers. Some of them can load-balance between two cellular data cards and effectively give you twice the bandwidth. Extra bonus if you're in 4G coverage and 4G-capable cards (which in your case is extremely unlikely, as 4G isn't even in most major cities yet). But again, you have to have signal.

    2. Re:Amp your signal by mckinleyn · · Score: 1

      And here I thought you couldn't stop the signal...

  26. Canada & 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your travelling in Canada & using 3g, factor another $4.87 for vaseline becuase your going to be raped by the cell companies. We are known as the most expensive & overcharged for cell & data plans. $25/month gets you about 500mb or $80 for 5gb and .03 per mb after that. Oh yah that doesn't include the $6.95 (were going to charge you cause you'll take it) access fee. Im sure your web business is going to go through alot more than 5gb/month without considering voip usage.

  27. GSM/CDMA Amplifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on where you go, you can get some extra single inside those areas using a booster/amplifier. Search for SmoothTalker, they sell 3 watt boosters and amplifiers, you can also do a search and find Wilson products, but those are not *true* 3 watt transmit.

  28. Wifi by WPIDalamar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nationwide wireless internet sucks.

    Stay at campgrounds that offer Wifi, problem solved.

    KOA has tons.

    http://koa.com/

    1. Re:Wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, one of my favorites is in Williamsburg, VA - WiFi from the popup is nice.

    2. Re:Wifi by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      KOA is also shiat and charges like they're the best thing on the planet.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    3. Re:Wifi by sukotto · · Score: 1

      I stayed at the Leavenworth, WA KOA earlier this year. They do indeed have free wifi. The reception was really bad and the speeds were slow.
      Forget about gaming... just viewing web pages was painfully slow.
      (In all other respects it was a great campground though. I'd go there again)

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    4. Re:Wifi by amiga500 · · Score: 1

      Many campgrounds will have WiFi of some sort or the other. If they don't, you're probably staying in an area which isn't going to have 3G service, and may only be able to get a 1 bar signal on Edge.
      I'd suggest building a cantenna, as often campgrounds have a single Linksys router in the lodge, and if your parked more than 50 ft away you'll have a hard time connecting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantenna

  29. On the Go internet by juniorkindergarten · · Score: 1

    I have set up an internet connection using the cradlepoint mbr1000. A very cool little device.
    I set this up for an OHL team we that we drive around into a 56 person coach along with a 3000W inverter. This allows up to 18 people (18 outlets) to plug in their laptops and get high speed internet access.

    The setup was a snap, I just grabbed a rocket stick, plugged it into the router, gave it juice and followed the setup instructions. Setting up the security, and (yes) parental controls was a snap. So long as there is a cell tower they have access to the internet, and most importantly has yet to drop the connection at highway speeds. I'll keep an eye on this thread and answer any questions.

    --
    "Every security scheme that is based on secrets eventually fails." - Steve Jobs
    1. Re:On the Go internet by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      So this provides a router that fails over to the stronger bandwidth provider when you lose connectivity with anther one, is that right (in a nutshell)? But doesn't his problem remain that he still won't have a bandwidth provider when he's in the middle of nowhere because there will be no cellular signal and he won't have satellite because it is too expensive?

    2. Re:On the Go internet by juniorkindergarten · · Score: 1

      In all honesty I only use a single stick into the router. The documentation says it will provide fail over. I believe the idea is that if you use a cable or dsl link and it goes down, only then will it switch over to the cellular service. Most cell providers also provide a coverage map, and the type of cellular service provided ie 1x, gsm, cdma, edge, 3g, hspa. I would use one of those maps during my trip planning so I would be in an area with appropriate coverage.

      --
      "Every security scheme that is based on secrets eventually fails." - Steve Jobs
    3. Re:On the Go internet by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      I think there are some great solutions out here, but I think the guy is stuck with slow satellite access if he wants to go out in the middle of nowhere. About the fastest mobile satellite feed i've seen this morning was for 128KB down, which is pretty slow for anything other than just text. I guess he doesn't really have that much to bitch about though, he's going to be cruising in an RV full time instead of being stuck in a cubicle. I wish I had that problem.

  30. Packet radio by Ironchew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If speed and latency aren't priorities and you can deal with unencrypted transmission, I'd recommend getting an amateur radio license and operating a packet radio.

    1. Re:Packet radio by Ironchew · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself here. I forgot to add that the FCC also forbids the use of amateur radio for commercial purposes. Stick with the existing infrastructure for your web business. If you need daily connectivity, forget remote areas. Satellite internet is the only thing I can think of.

    2. Re:Packet radio by zentec · · Score: 1

      What good are 300 baud and 1200 baud transmissions with latency measured in the tens of seconds? The email he seeks is to remain in touch with his business (not exactly kosher on amateur radio). He wants low latency for VOIP. Packet isn't going to do that. And considering the decline of packet radio within the hobby, there isn't much chance of being able to digipeat somewhere to actually *find* an internet gateway. There's Winlink, but then he's likely to have to pack HF communications gear.

      More of a problem though is the increasing cry of FOUL over recreational vehicle and sailboat owners using WinLink as cheap alternatives to pay services (like Sailmail). While I don't think these people will cause the chaos and mayhem often cited by posts on ham websites, the people complaining do have a some salient points. The biggest being that there's a segment of users of amateur services and spectrum who are there for the FREE stuff and contribute nothing. Once amateur radio no longer serves their purposes, they are outta there. Not exactly the group you want carrying the hobby forward -- as if it doesn't have enough problems of its own.

    3. Re:Packet radio by vlm · · Score: 1

      If speed and latency aren't priorities and you can deal with unencrypted transmission, I'd recommend getting an amateur radio license and operating a packet radio [wikipedia.org].

      Close to the correct answer...

      The actual answer is to get your license, and get some knowledge and experience about operating in the 1296 MHz band, which is close enough to cell bands. (don't bother learning about the 1.8 to 2.0 MHz band, at least w/ regard to solving this problem). Basically become a 1296 MHz rover for radio contests. A successful 1296 contest rover will have a pretty good idea how to get cell service from far away. RF is RF.

      The SSB microwave contesters easily work several hundred miles ... Yes I know shannons law applies and you wont get that with 3G, power levels, bandwidth, modulation schemes, etc. However you will learn how to optimize your system in those microwave bands, and that's the part that matters.

      In order of priority:

      1) Patience. Sometimes weather conditions will not permit. Try again in a few hours.

      2) Average terrain height. Parked in a valley? Forget it. Mountain climbing works better. You may get better connectivity at the top of a hill with bare laptop than at the bottom of the hill with all kinds of gadgets.

      3) Antenna height about average terrain. This means an antenna on a portable tower or mast. The range difference between 3 feet off the ground and 50 feet off the ground is pretty spectacular. Most mobile masts seem to involve a L shaped foot that the vehicles is parked upon, plus some guy wires.

      4) Directional antennas pointing at civilization, or at least toward a cellphone tower. Antenna rotator? Maybe.

      5) Ultra low loss feedline between antenna and radio. Figure at least a buck a foot. No point in buying a very expensive high powered amp, if all it does is heat up the feedline. This will also provide an interesting education in connector installation and locating adapters via google.

      6) Amplifiers. Probably technically illegal for cell phone use, but they'll help, assuming you don't over or under drive the amp.

      The cheapest solution is to simply research the problem, and always keep a step or two ahead. For example, the campsite my family visits on an irregular basis has perfectly good WiFi. If you can't use google, now would be a good time to learn, rather than while out on the road. If that really nice campsite has no wifi, I'm not certain, but I think the solution is not to go there.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Packet radio by vlm · · Score: 1

      What good are 300 baud and 1200 baud transmissions

      If it ran multinational corporations a few decades ago, it'll run a web store or whatever today. Even 31 baud PSK31 is somewhat faster than ZERO.

      cheap alternatives to pay services (like Sailmail).

      Probably his best solution is a sorcerers apprentice / trainee drone and Sailmail, or something like it, to keep in daily contact with said sorcerers apprentice. Live near a college town? I would guess a junior year business major would be just about right, old enough to not be a total idiot, and young enough to really need the experience for the resume... Heck, write the kid an excellent reference letter, might get the kid to work for free as an "intern".

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Packet radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that he wants to run his business using this link, and business communications are prohibited by section 97.113 (IIRC) of the US amateur radio rules.

    6. Re:Packet radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no business can be operated over packet radio, part 97 fcc

    7. Re:Packet radio by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Isn't this a 1296 contest weekend?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  31. Two RVs by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    The first RV stops at the edge of 3G connectivity. The 2nd goes on into the bush and uses WiFi and cantennas on masts to achieve connectivity to the 1st RV and thus the 3G network.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Two RVs by BlindSpot · · Score: 1

      Wow, that gives a whole new meaning to "Internet Relay Chat"!

  32. Troll from the RV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    First post!

  33. There is no silver bullet by hande1 · · Score: 1

    This is a problem I have been faced with in several projects in and the message is...there is no silver bullet. You cannot magically construct backhaul where there is zero infrastructure. It's just not possible. The only thing you can feasibly do is work within the confines of available technologies, and maximise the usability of these. For example, I am using a home-made gateway in my most recent project, using Squid + Cellular dongle (HSPA/EDGE/GPRS). However, in this case the difference is that several users are using the network, thus a caching proxy makes perfect sense because my users are using separate terminals to access the same data. As someone else has mentioned, you can also pick devices that give you the best chance of getting a signal. in my experience, cable loss on most devices is such that unless you plan on taking directional equipment with you and spending a few mins aiming it, this is pointless. Make sure your adapter supports receive diversity as many of the cheap Huawei models vendors like to give out just don't. Going back to SW approaches... you can maximise speed by utilising server side compression at your ISP end (mostly enforced on you though to be honest). This way you're pulling down as little as possible - and really that is the key. Alternatively I floated a concept I disgustingly labelled 'cloud caching'. Basically the premise of using a VPS or dedicated server to do this content compression using FOSS, and then using the VPS as a gateway - http://up-stream.co.uk/2009/05/rabbit-web-proxy/ Before I cut away from that point, if you don't fancy rolling your own, and you don't know if your operator has any data compression you can hook onto Opera Turbo, which does the same thing but you're at the mercy of their servers - http://up-stream.co.uk/2009/05/opera-turbo-testing/ I can only speak for cellular, and not for satellite. Other /.'ers will be able to help there, but what little experience I do have leads me to believe your connection will be a bigger running cost than the petrol you put in your RV... easily. Also, sorry for using links to my own work. By all mean look for other resources RE the stuff I have pointed out. Google is our friend.

    1. Re:There is no silver bullet by hande1 · · Score: 1
      Sorry... formatting FAIL.

      This is a problem I have been faced with in several projects in and the message is...there is no silver bullet.

      You cannot magically construct backhaul where there is zero infrastructure. It's just not possible.

      The only thing you can feasibly do is work within the confines of available technologies, and maximise the usability of these. For example, I am using a home-made gateway in my most recent project, using Squid + Cellular dongle (HSPA/EDGE/GPRS). However, in this case the difference is that several users are using the network, thus a caching proxy makes perfect sense because my users are using separate terminals to access the same data.

      As someone else has mentioned, you can also pick devices that give you the best chance of getting a signal. in my experience, cable loss on most devices is such that unless you plan on taking directional equipment with you and spending a few mins aiming it, this is pointless. Make sure your adapter supports receive diversity as many of the cheap Huawei models vendors like to give out just don't.

      Going back to SW approaches... you can maximise speed by utilising server side compression at your ISP end (mostly enforced on you though to be honest). This way you're pulling down as little as possible - and really that is the key. Alternatively I floated a concept I disgustingly labelled 'cloud caching'. Basically the premise of using a VPS or dedicated server to do this content compression using FOSS, and then using the VPS as a gateway - http://up-stream.co.uk/2009/05/rabbit-web-proxy/

      Before I cut away from that point, if you don't fancy rolling your own, and you don't know if your operator has any data compression you can hook onto Opera Turbo, which does the same thing but you're at the mercy of their servers - http://up-stream.co.uk/2009/05/opera-turbo-testing/

      I can only speak for cellular, and not for satellite. Other /.'ers will be able to help there, but what little experience I do have leads me to believe your connection will be a bigger running cost than the petrol you put in your RV... easily.

      Also, sorry for using links to my own work. By all mean look for other resources RE the stuff I have pointed out. Google is our friend.

    2. Re:There is no silver bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have silver bullets manufactured. The problem is whether microwaves can bounce off of silver bullets.

  34. Copy the offshore sailing world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure on what your budget is but in offshore sailing (and other offshore activity I'm sure), we use products from immarsat (http://www.inmarsat.com/), essentially using sat phones to get access. Again, not sure if it fits your budget, but perhaps combining this with a 3G data plan will keep you online while you RV across NA.

    1. Re:Copy the offshore sailing world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could do what the Navy does and just find the closest fiber line out at sea and 'tap it' :D

      They might not approve of your temporarily inhibiting their connectivity for free access though :D

  35. Internet RV'ing could revolutionize the pursuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you imagine a future where RV-based internet combined with flash, google street view, a rack of graphics processors connected to a grid of LCDs could provide an incredible view of the road with resolutions as high as VGA with refresh rates possibly higher than 2 or even 3 times a second!!! Super-low latencies of 30,000 milliseconds should be able to guarantee a revolution in RV'ing turning a pedestrian pursuit into a heart-stopping thrill-ride!

  36. Parent is more Offtopic than Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay on topic. Everyone here has to toss their two cents in every chance they get, which detracts from the topic at hand.

    1. Re:Parent is more Offtopic than Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with parent - grandparent is along the lines of "you're talking about TV? I don't own a TV!".

  37. Internet Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was I the only one who read the description and thought to myself "Good internet connection, in an RV, web based business... sounds like a recipe for a porn site" Run live shows each night for your subscribers, but do things in remote locations.

    I live out in the woods myself, way off track for ANY ISP to want to touch me. I grudingigly opt for 3G because it seems like the best I can get, and Verizon's service is sometimes slower than dial-up, sometimes not.

    What you're asking for sounds like a technological holy grail. Good internet access anywhere in the world that can be used by anyone who can RTFM.

  38. Tether iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a linksys wireless router upgrade to dd-wrt set it up as a repeater/bridged and use the iPhone third party tethering to broadcast the signal to the router... it works!

  39. the people questioning why by maharb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Half the comments have some portion dedicated to criticizing the idea of RVing and "being connected'. Why is it so hard to understand that liking the outdoors/road and having internet are not opposites. Everyone that is asking why he even needs internet should ask themselves why they want phone service when not at home. The internet is just as much a tool as a frying pan or a tent these days, and having access to it at all times is very useful. Not to mention that one could spend all day hiking around and doing activities outside only to retreat back to camp and want an hour or two of connectivity. Not totally insane if you ask me. As for how to do it? Well I am not an expert in that area so I will let someone else help out.

    1. Re:the people questioning why by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

      A frying pan is a physical object you can take with you. Until you can take the internet with you on a chip, it's not happening.

      The fact is, it's a service, like electricity and plumbing. And not every area is going to have said services, and it's not feasible to expect that sort of connectivity from everywhere. It's not that the OP is just satisfied with connectivity, he wants constant, low latency connectivity anywhere.

      This is not doable. It's just not. Plain and simple.

    2. Re:the people questioning why by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      sorry.. yes they are.. look at the minnesota map. see all the awesome shoreline on lake superior north of duluth? starting about 45 minutes north of duluth on US63 you no longer have data service reliably... starting 90 minutes north you pretty much don't have it at all. except for a couple of pockets - grand marais being one of them. ely being another.

      that's the outdoors.

      even in iowa.. a place SATURATED with signal i don't get EVDO or 1X in many of our state parks due to line of sight issues [hills exist in iowa. i know it's hard to believe, but they do].

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    3. Re:the people questioning why by maharb · · Score: 1

      I was not saying it is doable I am saying that it makes sense he wants it.

      Many are saying because he is RVing he shouldn't want to use the internet and that is just plain dumb logic.

      My point wasn't that he should be able to do it. The point was that it was a good question.

    4. Re:the people questioning why by maharb · · Score: 1

      I am talking about the idea of being outdoors, and the idea of using the internet not being exclusive.

      The comments that say "you are Rving you should be enjoying the outdoors not on the internet" are the ones I am addressing. Just because places exist where you don't get internet does not mean there aren't plenty of places you can get it.

    5. Re:the people questioning why by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

      It's easier and cheaper in the long run to just tell the person it's not doable than it is to try and explain to them the different technologies they have.

      What the OP wants is not doable. That's not to say that there aren't situations where it is doable, but what the OP has asked for is not doable.

      There are a multitude of technologies that can be used together to provide varying levels of internet access, but at some point or another you are going to trade off speed for availability.

      In the absolute of remote locations, you will not have connectivity without having a satellite connection. But to the OP, the satellite connection isn't good enough--yet it is the only option in those areas.

    6. Re:the people questioning why by maharb · · Score: 1

      It was a question. That implies he didn't know the answer.

      And, again, again. My OP was in no way related to the feasibility of having internet in the wilderness. It was merely addressing the constant posts saying that if he is out in the wilderness he doesn't need internet and shouldn't want it either. Those posts have nothing to do with feasibility.

    7. Re:the people questioning why by macaddict · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard to understand that liking the outdoors/road and having internet are not opposites. Actually, they ARE opposites. These people said they want "remote". I'm guessing you've never been to "remote" before? Remote means that at the campground the toilet very well may be just a seat over a hole in the ground, the water comes from a hand pump, most likely no electricity, and you may have to drive 50 miles to get cell phone coverage. Maybe they are from NYC and their idea of "remote" is Chicago, but it's kind of the definition of "remote" that you are away from many of the amenities of civilization -- including internet access. The internet is just as much a tool as a frying pan or a tent these days, and having access to it at all times is very useful. And guess what? When I want to get remote, I make sacrifices. When I backpack into the wilderness, I don't carry a frying pan (far too heavy) and I use a light-weight tent that barely squeezes two people into it (once again, weight is an issue). And I don't expect there to be internet access, or even cell coverage for that matter! Yes, it would be very useful if I could pack in a comfy mattress and a bathroom, but if I really need those things that badly, I can take my vacations at a hotel or just stay home. If they must have a constant connection for gaming, and satellite isn't good enough for them, then they should forget about remote and just stay at KOAs as others have suggested. Or a Holiday Inn.

    8. Re:the people questioning why by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      I think if they wanted to be that remote they wouldn't be RVing.

      Some of us like "soft" remote or Remote 1.0 over "hard" remote / Remote 2.0

    9. Re:the people questioning why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet is just as much a tool as a frying pan or a tent these days, and having access to it at all times is very useful.

      The internet is a far less useful tool (gasp!) than a tent or a pot. Shelter and access to drinkable water (sterilized by boiling) are pretty fundamental things in this life. You have to go pretty far up the luxury scale before a low-latency, high bandwidth, reliable internet connection fits in. Useful, yes. But nowhere near the same as shelter or water. The fact that you even compare them implies you really don't get it.

      I once read a story about a person talking with their grandmother while preparing dinner. The grandmother asked what kitchen feature they liked the most. They thought for a while and said the microwave. The grandmother took this in and replied - "I'd go for running water, every time."

    10. Re:the people questioning why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea - I think these idiots like being outside with wifi too ;)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evf4Uf_XiPo

    11. Re:the people questioning why by anyGould · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are misunderstanding the OP question (or maybe I am).

      What I'm reading isn't "I'm going on vacation and have to micromanage my business" (to which the correct answer is "stop being married to your job", as posted several dozen times above)

      What I'd like to know (and what the OP wants to know, I think) is can we solve the general case of telecommuting? He does his work on the web (and thus isn't tied to a physical address for the job). If he can work from his house, why not on the road? How far will current tech take us?

      I would happily give up most aspects of civilization to go live in the woods. Except my internet. (And since you're reading this, join the club). The idea of being able to truck around the country while working doesn't sound half-bad to me.

      My grandfather spent many years living out of an RV, working as a welder at remote sites. His place was nicer than mine, and he never needed to pack. *g*

  40. sprint mifi! by mytrip · · Score: 1

    I have a Sprint MiFi and like it but you should know Sprint and Verizon do not have data everywhere they have voice. AT&T does but I dont think they have a MiFi right now. The mifi is from novatel and gives you a wireless hotspot that provides data for up to 5 devices. Way cool and no software to install. I just love mine.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
  41. RV = Campgrounds and Parking Lots by xzvf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The very size of a typical RV is going to limit the roughing it. You won't be driving it cross country, you'll likely be on Interstates and staying in campgrounds. Many campgrounds already offer WiFi, as do most bookstores and restaurants. Map out where you are going on the internet, and identify chain stores that offer WiFi. Stop in their parking lot, walk around and get something to eat and get access. Picking campgrounds that offer WiFi isn't difficult either.

    1. Re:RV = Campgrounds and Parking Lots by aclarke · · Score: 1

      First of all, the summary says "the intrepid RV'er wants to get remote and into those parts of the coverage map that are usually gray (no coverage)". That doesn't sound like your average Walmart parking lot, does it?

      Secondly, I suggest you look at the following URLs for some examples of "RVs" of which you may not be aware:
      Unicat
      Earth Roamer

      I've specifically limited this list to two companies that actually sell products in the United States.

    2. Re:RV = Campgrounds and Parking Lots by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The very size of a typical RV is going to limit the roughing it. You won't be driving it cross country, you'll likely be on Interstates and staying in campgrounds.

      That can still be cross country though maybe not wilderness travel. When I lived in Florida I knew this couple who when they retired, they worked at the college I was going to, bought an RV and drove it on a cross country journey. They were gone for more than a year driving all over the US and part of Canada. They even drove up to Alaska. If that's not cross country I don't know is cross country.

      And this was before the internet was even widely known or used.

      Falcon

    3. Re:RV = Campgrounds and Parking Lots by westlake · · Score: 1

      The very size of a typical RV is going to limit the roughing it. You won't be driving it cross country, you'll likely be on Interstates and staying in campgrounds

      There are customized RVs for off-road use. Off Road Motorhomes But in most cases any hard surfaced road will do - and campers have been using them since the 1920s.

  42. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    With a motor vehicle, sure, your point about roads and trepidity is fair. Under your own power, however, I'd say biking a few good mountain chains, even on a road, is decently intrepid.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  43. 3G to WiFi bridge and balloon by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Loft your 3G bridge with a tethered balloon or kite.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:3G to WiFi bridge and balloon by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      I live out in the sticks where Internet is either satellite or dial-up, and actually priced out a balloon to get line of site for the local wireless provider since neither choice was appealing. I looked at advertising balloons, as they were generally large enough to hoist a payload and a bit more durable. For the balloon, cable tether, anchor, a supply of helium, solar panels, strobe (for aircraft), battery, etc. was something like $1500 at the time. It was a bit more for the UFO shaped one to fsck with the neighbors. ;-)

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
  44. Verizon + Cradlepoint + Wilson antenna by machinegunben · · Score: 1

    I drive to some pretty remote places storm chasing, and use a Cradlepoint CTR350 with a Verizon USB727 aircard hooked up to an external wilson mag mount dual band antenna. This is about the best you will do without using expensive satellite.

    --
    I'm going to create my own nerd website, with blackjack.. and hookers.. In fact, forget the site
  45. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This fits all the criteria except for price... Do a search on BGAN DSL. I wish this technology would come down in price, as I"m sure it will eventually. This seems to be the BEST solution out there if you can afford it.

  46. Satellite is the only way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did some research on this a while back and it costs about $5K to get a satellite dish installed that will allow you to travel and rotate the dish for you each time you reach your destination. In addition the satellite internet providers charge around $100+ per month to support this solution. The site http://www.rv-satellite-internet.com/ shows how you can manually set it up and align the dish yourself. The pros are that it only costs $45 per month and you don't have to pay an outrageous price for the install. The downside is that you have to align the dish yourself each time and there is no tech support. I've heard you can expect around 400Kbps - 900Kbps on the down and 100Kbps on the up. Latency will be around 100ms as it is for most wireless-based solutions.

  47. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with the BWCA suggestion. Used to go there with my father when I was in high school (mid-90's). The first day was the roughest, but after that you adjust quickly to the physical aspect of it, and the lack of technology. Its very refreshing to cleanse the system of overexposure to EM and computers.

  48. I just did this trip: don't bother trying for wifi by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    I just spent a week driving through rural Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana, with two friends. When we weren't on the Interstate, we had, during the entire week, a grand total of less than an hour when any one of the cellphones could pick up enough signal to talk. When we *were* on the Interstates, we had cellphone coverage less than half the time. In any of the towns of under 2000 people, I never saw any wireless access using kismet and the standard laptop pcmcia card antenna. In larger towns, like Bozeman or Billings, there was great cellphone coverage and even some open access points, especially near big hotels. But once we were out of sight of towns that size (and there are only about 12 of them in the whole area) there was absolutely nothing.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  49. high latency == bad performance of SSH by ndege · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I admin a number of servers and work from home most days. My wife and I would love to live further out in the countryside without all the noise and light pollution. Most people that I mention this too have an instant solution: satellite. The problem that most people don't understand, and the problem I find myself explaining, is the concept of high latency. As I use SSH for my livelihood, low latency is extremely important.

    Most people don't understand the negative effect of latency on interactive real-time communication until I use the example of gaming. That's when people "get it"...even though I haven't playing anything online in a couple of years.

    The most important service to my life right now, and the way I earn my livelihood, is via SSH.

    Could it be that because he runs some webservers, he _might_ need SSH...that, and he might have kids and/or a spouse that likes to game?

    Seems reasonable to me.

    Just FYI, I do agree with a post from another thread that explains it this way:

    1. user wishes to be out in the sticks
    2. user wants connectivity
    3. connectivity isn't always available in the sticks.
    4. therefore user isn't always able to get connectivity when in the sticks.
    5. profit?

    --
    Sig Return: 204 No Content
    1. Re:high latency == bad performance of SSH by jeffstar · · Score: 1

      i work on some sites that have satellite connections and 800ms on ssh ain't that bad.

    2. Re:high latency == bad performance of SSH by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. If he means SSH, he can write "ssh". He doesn't have to couch it in terms that a non-technical person would understand.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:high latency == bad performance of SSH by vlm · · Score: 1

      As I use SSH for my livelihood, low latency is extremely important.

      Depends how you're using ssh. If you ssh into something to run vi (vim, whatever) there is a much lower latency solution.

      VPN in and NFS mount the directory... then run vi locally. Yes each file save will still take 1600 ms longer or whatever, but local typing and such will be regular speed.

      Then there is always rsync and friends, such as bidirectional "unison".

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:high latency == bad performance of SSH by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Your suggestion is only true for vim if you turn off a few features like bracket matching since they try to read the file you're editing over and over (I noticed this when accessing files at work through a tunnel from home, turned off bracket matching and Vim stopped freezing anytime I did anything).

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    5. Re:high latency == bad performance of SSH by ndege · · Score: 1

      Interesting...I will have to look into it! Thanks!!

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
  50. Solution by wolfguru · · Score: 1

    Pretty simple. Dialup to a wide area provider or one that has 800-number access. Earthlink or other similar providers like netzero come to mind. Anywhere you are going to take a larger RV you are going to have some type of wired phone access, though cell/tethered smartphone is still going to be available in most of those areas and provide superior speed. All you need is a modem, a decent length phone cord and a LOT of patience. I might suggest a remote access service on a PC left at home, like Teamviewer as a possibility. The teamviewer interface will work well enough on a dialup-speed connection to allow you to remote control the home unit for better browsing speed. Gaming is pretty much out of the question on dialup at this point, and remote control of the home pc will have too much latency to keep up, but for the types of other access you are talking about, this will provide an acceptable solution and should be available pretty much anywhere you are going to go with an RV.

  51. Oddly enough, I just did this exercise... by UttBuggly · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife and I are considering an RV next spring and plan to take 1-4 week trips all over North America.

    I did some research and concluded that a combination of satellite, 3G, and a WiFi repeater would give us reasonable results. The difference is that we DON'T have a business to mind, don't need low-latency links for gaming, and don't plan on going to the middle of nowhere. I figured that even the TiVO would work while driving, with a $2500 mobile satellite antenna rig on the roof.

    You're asking for a "perfect" solution, which is your case, does not exist.

    The simple solution is the 7P rule; "Proper prior planning prevents piss poor performance".

    Decide which is more important on any jaunt...going where no man has gone before OR grinding some quests in WoW.

    Put another way...and most technology adheres to THIS rule; the three variables are GOOD, FAST, and CHEAP - pick the two that are most important for YOU to have.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  52. Android by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    I have used a Android phone tethered for 3G via USB, Wi-Fi tethering was also possible. I had an app that would automaticly detect and connect to open access points. I actually hadn't tested that, but it would be possible to leech nearby open hotspots as required.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  53. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

    If you want something moderately challenging then leave at home all your electronics and canoe/portage 50 miles into the Boundary Waters Canoe Area for an intrepid vacation. Trust me, to see land so pristine was a near religious experience and I definitely went back.

    My uncle and a few of my cousins do that once a year. They do rent a satphone to take with them, but it's for them to call out, not for people to call them. At $2/min, they're not doing much calling out either.

  54. Intrepid Houseboater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm interested in the best solution, but all I'm reading is a bunch of posts on why this guy shouldn't want what he's asked for. I'm a geek and I like to have an internet connection. I also like to use my houseboat in the Northern California foothills. I used to have no connection and now have Edge. 3G or wifi from the marina are my goals. I like nature AND the intertubes. Chillax...

  55. My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just drove from Richmond, VA to Burning Man in an RV. In the RV I installed:

    Wilson GSM/TDMA DirectConnect Signal Booster - $180
    Wilson Trucker Dual Band 18" RV Roof/Hole Mount Antenna w/Spring - $50
    Linksys Wireless-G Router for ATT&T/Cingular 3G/UMTS Broadband WRT54G3G - $120
    Sierra AirCard 881 Wireless Unlocked High Speed PCMCIA Card (plugs directly into the router) - $55

    I ran all of this off of the 12V system in the RV, I just cut the wall wart off of the router power cord and wired it directly. We had good, usable internet from the time we left Richmond until we pulled off of the road onto the playa.

  56. waav cellular routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Trailways buses use WAAV (www.waav.com) for uninterrupted wifi (unless you're in a tunnel) - works great and is fast.

  57. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by ahoehn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I donno, these are pretty #&$**!@ intrepid. Or at least, built to allow for some rather intrepid RV'ing. So, you know, it could happen. We live near the hospital that commissioned this particularly ridiculous piece of machinery, and every time I see it, I get filled with the desire to drive over some shit. In a very manful way.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  58. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I telecommute 40 hrs / week from a rural area in the US. I use a Sprint 3G connection (Novatel USB727) through a Cradlepoint MBR-1000 as my sole Internet connection because no one sends lines to where I live.

    Pros:
    1. High-speed connection and get to live where I want. Download speeds can be as high as 130KB/s (not kbps) from my home, higher if you are in good range to a tower.
    2. No download cap if you were grandfathered in / have a business plan. But I think even then, this has changed. My employer pays, but my overage is at a lower corporate rate.
    3. Mobility is awesome. My wife and I often travel, and my Internet comes along. We've considered RVing, but use the carrier's web site to find if 3G coverage exists where you want to go
    4. Cradlepoint can do failover / load balancing with latest firmware. If you take it where you travel, you can use it as a traditional router or get some throughput boost. I have used it in the past with a slower but more stable fixed wireless (point-to-point radio) connection to solve one of the "cons" below.
    5. I have a friend with a nearly identical setup who games on his XBox 360. Don't kid yourself that there won't be lag, but he enjoys himself and is fairly competitive.

    Cons:
    1. Beware the 5GB/mo. cap if you do much of anything. This gets VERY expensive if you go over.
    2. Upload speed is not good. Can be painful, even.
    3. I have coverage at home, but my nearest tower is flaky. Connection can drop 6-8 times per day, or start spiraling to 13000 - 18000 ms ping times (not a typo). Usually, problem self-corrects in about 20 minutes. Sprint / hardware replacement has not resolved, continues to be a phantom problem, usually bad about 2 or 3 times in a 1-2 week period.
    4. Roaming to Canada may be problematic depending on your US data plan. Unsure about how Canadian data plans would work.
    5. Latency is a pain. Unless you're near a good 3G tower, don't think that you can do much with video or voice.

    Overall, I think 3G would be a good solution if you can live with speeds that were considered "high speed" 5 or 10 years ago and can live within the cap (e.g. no iTunes HD movies for you). With a mix of 802.11 connectivity if your campground / coffee shop supports it, you might not even care that at other times you are going a little slower. I've lived out here for a few years, and while I go into town to a wifi hotspot to download large OS updates, i get by and don't really have trouble working from home.

  59. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not impressing anyone...

  60. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I love the BWCA, it does make me sad that it is as close as we can get to 'ruffing it' here in the US.

  61. let me fix that for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, you run a business that can't last one day without you? oh? and it's web-based? me smells an mlm.
    if not - take a freaking vacation and get disconnected.

  62. Cell and Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes contrary to some of the feedback here, you can have it all. I have a 4 wheel drive RV and get miles off the beaten path and still maintain connectivity. These days you have your 9-5 work life on a canyon rim, an empty beach or a mountain top. Your views beat these cubicle monkeys' and once you're off the clock you can climb, bike, swim or hike outside your front door.

    I have redundant systems "just in case". I use a Cradlepoint CTR350 router with a Verizon USB Modem and a Wilson 3 amp booster when I've got some cell service, but break out a Starband Satellite when I'm really out of reach. Yes there is some latency and I don't game, but for most purposes it works great. It's a little pricey but the freedom is worth it. Enjoy the great outdoors and still get paid, it's the only way to live!

  63. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BWCA is primitive, but if you think it's pristine you don't know its history.

  64. 3G Versus Satellite (Wifi=no way) by drbuzz0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The simplest and easiest way to get service on the road is with a 3G setup. The major phone carriers in the US all offer pretty descent data service. Verizon probably has the single largest, although Cingular is getting close. T-mobile is almost non-existent. Check their coverage maps and compare it to where you want to go. Also, note that you don't need to be in the 3G/high speed area to access the internet. The equipment will work anywhere you can get a cell phone signal. If you are out of the 3G area, it falls back on the standard 2G/Voice system. Expect the speed of this service to be slightly better than an analog phone modem. In other words, if you want to email and surf pages that are mostly text, it's perfectly fine. If you want to do a lot of video, then the 2G service will be very frustrating and take a long long long time to upload or download the content.

    The best thing you can do for coverage, if you're planning on going on the fringe is use an external amplifier/booster and put a reasonably high gain antenna mounted high on the RV. With this, you'll pull in a good solid signal where the standard issue equipment won't get anything. You can find them any number of places online. Make sure it works with the high speed/3G service - usually on the 1.9 ghz band. You can get even better distance if you put the antenna on some kind of expendable telescopic pole. An antenna mounted high with a descent amplifier will get you many miles of added coverage.

    If you are really really out in the boonies, like in the badlands of Death Valley or the isolated ravines of the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming, then there is no service that you will be able to rely on other than satellite. There are two basic kinds of satellite internet: Mobile satellite services and DBS type satellite systems. The mobile satellite services include Inmarsat, Irridium and Globalstar. These systems are explicitly designed to operate in motion and to be used in extremely remote locations. Irridium, for example, works on all points on the earth, even Antartica. The equipment is small and portable. There are a couple disadvantages: they are generally slow, and in the case of globalstar and iridium, they are absolutely snails pace - think 2400 baud under good conditions. Inmarsat has a service called BGAN, which is about 128kbps per channel. It is also astronomically expensive.. just stunningly expensive. Think 5-7 dollars a megabyte expensive. It's so expensive that if you can rack up over a thousand dollars in traffic just by casual internet surfing for a couple of weeks.

    Then there is the other kind of satellite internet: the DBS/VSAT type. This type is really designed primarily for residential and small buisiness use. It is offered in areas that are lacking DSL, FIOS or Cable. You wouldn't ever want to install this in an area that did, because its generally inferior to those kinds of connections due to latency. The latency is not so bad that you can't surf the web - usually it's acceptable but don't expect to do online gaming with it, because it has ping times of 400+ ms. The equipment for this is small dish and a residential modem/gateway. It's on par with DirecTV or Dish Network in terms of the size of the dish. It costs anywhere from 50-150 dollars a month for the service. Although the dishes are generally intended to be fixed mounted, you can attach them to a tripod or something for portability. If you want to use it while you're in motion, then you can do that too, but expect to pay more than $1500 for an in-motion tracking system.

    If you go with satellite, I'd recommended Wildblue, but you can also look at HughesNet and Starband. Expect to pay a few hundred for equipment and maybe 75-100 a month for the service. It will work anywhere in North America that has a clear view of the South.

    Wifi? You have got to be kidding me. If you mean to use it within the RV to allow you to move freely with your laptop, then that's one thing, but to a

  65. Why? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Why bother driving away from your network connections, when all you want to do is use the internet? Park your RV behind your house, then you can use your WiFi to your hearts content, without needing expensive equipment, or needing to waste a lot of gas going somewhere you don't care to be.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  66. Traveling Between the USA and Canada...... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    with your cell phone can be an expensive proposition if you do not have access to a plan that covers both countries. I commonly use a boat in the San Juan Islands north of Seattle. The western edges of these islands is closer to Victoria (on the southern end of Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada) than it is to any US locations and boaters commonly "roam" into Canadian cell systems. Friends who have done some internet browsing without noticing that they are roaming have reported incredibly high charges - in the thousands of dollars - for data. This can also apply to Canadians who inadvertently roam into the USA cell systems.

    So whatever you do don't blithely cross the border while naively relying on your 3G network. You might get a big surprise when you get your next bill.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  67. I am fulltime in an RV with satellite internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to do it:
    My system is commercial grade: iDirect, 1Mbit down, 256Kbit up. $10k system + about $400/mo.
    2 1/2 years, no problems. Works anywhere I can see a specific "hole" in the Southern sky (from the Northern hemisphere). Unless I am in a serious jungle I can always position the dish/RV to hit that hole.
    High latency but you can reserve guaranteed minimum QOS for VOIP or streaming video (like the news trucks do). Even without reserved bandwidth I have used Skype just fine.
    Want one? Here is my ISP:
    http://www.mobilsat.com/
    There are cheaper satellite solutions available but they have bandwidth caps that no geek could live with (Ex: Hughes "Fair Access Policy")

    Why to do it:
    For you folks who think one has to be crazy to take the internet with them while "getting away from it all", you are obviously not considering extended travel -- months to years long.

    1. Re:I am fulltime in an RV with satellite internet by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      There are cheaper satellite solutions available but they have bandwidth caps that no geek could live with (Ex: Hughes "Fair Access Policy")

      Got that right. Hughsnet sucked 3 years ago when the only 'high speed' internet right here was an antique voiceline that you were lucky to get to connect at 14K. Forget 56K, it just didn't happen. A T1 line? About 75 miles away, in Vegas, and they weren't gonna run any fiber out here. We ran on Hughsnet for awhile, and constantly butted up against that FAP bucket. That was in place for the simple reason that Hughes way oversold their bandwidth, so if anybody decided to actually use what they paid for, they'd get knocked down to dialup speeds within the hour.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  68. I'm shocked and amazed by MrSmith0011000100110 · · Score: 1

    Shocked that nobody has suggested downloading the internet. I mean really... if I want to take files with me, I download them. So why can't he just download the internet and take it with him?

  69. Six months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a buyer for a company that used a lot of wireless... we used cellular, satellite, 802.11 a/b/g. even proprietary microwave. Ubiquity sells some systems that can span some huge distances.

    http://www.ubnt.com/

    Give them a call, see if they have something to suit your specific needs.

  70. CradlePoint MB1000/Kyocera KR2 + EVDO card by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

    ...works great for me. I have my EV-DO Kyocera KPC680 (Verizon) card with me everywhere and a Kyocera KR2 camps out in the car with its requisite DC-DC power adapter. Install a nice high-gain antenna (Wilson [eBay] has some decent +9/+13dB gain antennas for EV-DO/1xRTT and GSM/W-CDMA/UMTS bands) on the roof of the RV and make sure you have a decent groundplane if your roof is fiberglass (no worries if it is aluminum) and you should be fine for something like 95% of US roads traveled (you will drop to 1xRTT/EDGE in some areas, but 3G (EV-DO/W-CDMA/UMTS) is pretty well covered on most interstate routes, based on Verizon and at&t's service maps).

    For Canada... I'm not too sure there as I'm a Yank and have not had a need to visit our friends to the north yet. You might be able to get a roaming data plan that includes Canada from your US cellular provider though.

    FWIW, I work for Kyocera International, parent company of Kyocera Wireless.

    --
    As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    1. Re:CradlePoint MB1000/Kyocera KR2 + EVDO card by wagr · · Score: 1

      Just don't visit my house; I'm 80 meters off a US highway. Neither Verizon's nor AT&T's 3G hit here, even with an antenna. EDGE isn't enough for some things. Go 1/2 kilometer in any direction (okay, not down) and you're in heaven (relatively).

  71. Ham radio? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    If you've got a decent level ham license (or still remember enough EE stuff to get one easily, which shouldn't be much of a problem), you could try D-STAR or setup something similar:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-STAR

    While you can technically use D-STAR with only a technician license (which should cost you...I think $15 and an hour of your time), you would likely need a fairly high powered setup, and I think you can broadcast at higher power levels if you have a higher class of license. A directional antenna would be a good idea as well. Also, if you have a high license class you could possibly set up your own radio to internet gateway using a much lower frequency, which would give you a better range - though depending on where you are you may be better off with D-STAR. From what I've heard the coverage in the southern US is curently extremely good, but if you're in the north it may be a bit spotty - which is why I suggest a low frequency with _very_ big antennas. While it'd be very slow, you should theoretically be able to get it anywhere on the continent if your antenna farm is big enough - though I'm not entirely sure about the FCC rules, especially when it comes to using it for internet access.

  72. RV park owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As someone who owns an RV park in Iowa. I think you are mistaken. First and foremost I don't think we're talking about a guy who wants to take a week long vacation. It sounds like we're talking about a guy who is selling his house, and is going to be traveling via RV for the next 10 years. We have $500,000 RV's towing $80,000 cars behind them stop in. One of our biggest attractions in having free wifi over the entire park.

    He isn't looking for a quick e-mail fix, or checking guild chat. He most likely wants to run his entire business from the road for the next decade.

    My recommendation would be using something like an iNetVu RV satellite package, and a 3G wireless card with an amplified external antenna. If there isn't 3G coverage the satellite will still get them connected. I would even go so far as to say get two wireless cards from two different carriers. He also mentioned Canada so you're definitely going to want to get a Canadian cellular card/satellite solution for while you're there otherwise roaming costs would be absolutely outrages.

    There is no single solution that will guarantee coverage everywhere. Plan your routes to include stopping regularly at camp grounds or rest stops that have solid wifi so you can use them as emergency backups.

  73. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by aclarke · · Score: 1

    Hey, you're right. Everybody SHOULD be exactly like you! Maybe the submitter just wants to take his/her RV up to northern Alaska, park there for a month, and enjoy the blackflies while getting a little work done. What's the harm with that? It's a lot easier than trying to work out of a tent, or a kayak. Perhaps, gasp, he also takes vacations where he doesn't try to work.

    I'm self-employed and I can't say whether or not I make twice, or half, what you make, but if I want to go somewhere for a couple months and work half the time and be on vacation half the time, what's the problem with that? By your rationale, should I stay home one month and work, and then leave for a month of vacation? Why should I be limited to doing my work only from my home office? That's one of the main reasons I continue to be self-employed!

  74. HAM by raymansean · · Score: 1

    no really get an amateur radio license and set up a manned relay station that is connected to the net. No it will not be blazing fast but coverage will be great.

    --
    insert inflammatory comment here!
  75. 3G AND satellite is your only option by aclarke · · Score: 1

    If it was me on this trip, and I've thought about it, I'd get both a 3G system and satellite backup.

    Your order of preference would be this:

    1. Wifi or cable/DSL hookup. Useful for when you're parked next to somebody with better internet access than you have onboard.
    2. 3G or other cellphone-based technology.
    3. Satellite.

    Bridge whatever your transport technology is into your local network and retransmit as wifi if you want. Then you have always-on internet access as you have satellite as your fallback.

    Another thing to consider is cost. I believe (you'll have to look into this) that satellite will work from Mexico-Canada. 3G, however, will likely work but you will pay HUGE amounts of data roaming charges if you leave the United States. For this reason and apart from the fact that it is by no means continentally available, it is not a single solution for you.

  76. do it the way the pros from dover do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to see how the allied navies do it, check out ACP200 ...
    http://jcs.dtic.mil/j6/cceb/acps/acp200/ACP200B.pdf

    adapt for your personal choice of Inmarsat, or VHF/UHF repeater, or if you're really remote and high latitude, HF amateur radio ...

    but, then it depends on what you mean by Internet access ... mail? chat? video? HD movies?

  77. Recently I did just this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just last month I drove across the Western USA (Wyoming, Utah, AZ, NV, Dakotas etc.). Very Minimal (often zero) coverage in Yellowstone. Used Verizon USB 760 modem with cradlepoint CTR500 and roof mounted antennae. If you really want MAXIMUM coverage, I HIGHLY recommend adding an amplifier. There were times that our cell phones said no service but the Internet VERY marginally worked. When had a good connection, my Vonage VOIP adapter plugged into the CTR500 with a standard touch tone phone worked very well (at RV park with AC power - but adapter itself is 12V so you can make adapter to work on 12V if you want). But overall, I found that I wished that I had the extra amplifier. Sometimes when actually moving(driving) connections seemed a bit unstable. For maximum coverage, there could be value in a directional antennae and sometimes you find you are down low amongst heavy trees that block signal. All around - it works! Now that my trip is done, I carry the Modem/Router along with a battery pack in my work bag so I am now connected independently where ever I go.

  78. Chain O Lakes Campground by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

    The campground I manage has free WIFI, Shorts Brew pub, North Perk Coffee, Bellaire Bar also all have free WIFI the only local business that charges for the WIFI is McDonnalds. The only reason for a campground to not offer WIFI is a lack of a high speed provider.

  79. wmWifiRouter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a Windows Mobile Smart phone you can try http://www.wmwifirouter.com/ for use in places where you have 3g coverage.....

  80. For Canada... by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    If you want to stick to the strip of Canada that contains > 90% of the population, 3G is probably the way to go. It should cover most of the trip. If you want to stray beyond that area, you're basically out of luck unless you go with satellite. Keep in mind that Canada is larger than the US (area-wise), with about one tenth the population. As a result there are vast areas that simply have no economic justification for having wireless internet access (or even cell phone access). Imagine Alaska writ large.

    --
    linquendum tondere
  81. I just got done living two years on the road. by dhickman · · Score: 5, Informative

    There will be several modes that you will have use. As with anything else a fulltimer faces, no single solution will work all of the time.

    Stick with 12volt hardware. This should be obvious. You will not need to run your genny to have internet access.

    Pending where you are going to be this is what I have found to be the most flexible.

    Buy a cradlepoint or something similar that can take multiple brands of 3g cards/dongles, with a secondary ethernet wan port. Make sure the 3g cards/dongles have external antenna connectors.

    Buy an outdoor directional wifi CPE that has power over ethernet. Try to make sure it is 12v.

    Buy a wilson outdoor antenna, extension cable ( if needed) and connector dongle for each 3g card. I prefer makeing a custom mount that attached to the ladder, than penetrating the roof, but that is your choice.

    Buy a wilson amplifier, this is critical.

    Buy a motorola cable modem, and a at&t wired dsl modem.

    Locate a spot in the cabin that can wall mount the router, amp, and router the cables. I installed a separate lighted power switch for each of the 12v supplies, to make sure that the system had power and that I could cut it off and make it wife proof.

    Install the wifi CPE on a pole and make a mount that will mount to the ladder or other strong point. I would not bother will any fancy ethernet jacks on the outside, just have the cable go through the basement into the cabin.

    The problem with 3g is their 5gig limit. I would have a sprint and AT&T card. This should give you 3g over most of the US.

    The reason for the WIFI, is that almost all decent parks have some form of either pay wifi or free wifi. Turn it on, turn off the 3g and you win.

    All major truck stops have wifi, traditionally I always spent the night at flying J. I think their yearly price is not that bad.

    If you plan on spending more the two weeks at a single spot. Look for parks that advertise cable television. So far all but one of them, I found that I could get my cable modem working. None of the parks will be aware of this. All you do is plug the modem up and if it gets sync, try to surf. Usually there will be a redirect to the cable companies customer disservice line. If not call the customer service line. Usually you give them the mac and you will be online in minutes. Make sure that there is no contract since they are not supplying a modem. Cancel service when you leave.

    You can do this also with DSL on site supplied phone lines, but it takes days to weeks for the line to get turned up. I usually use dsl as a last hope.

    While on the road use 3g, for the parks, plan ahead and call the parks office. They usually will know if they have wifi and sometimes will know if their cable supports cable modems. Always have 2-3 parks ready, and pay the daily rate until you have verified which park is the best for a fulltimer.

    Good luck.
    dhh

  82. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by roadkill-maker · · Score: 1

    I have to agree with the BWCA suggestion. Used to go there with my father when I was in high school (mid-90's). The first day was the roughest, but after that you adjust quickly to the physical aspect of it, and the lack of technology. Its very refreshing to cleanse the system of overexposure to EM and computers.

    If you want to get away from EM I'd suggest you stay out of view of the sun :\

  83. I'm raising my eyebrow as I say this... by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very well said! This post deserves a score higher! Yes it's language, it's human, and it's not logical :-)

    Fascinating...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  84. Not for business use by dereference · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's an excellent idea for general "stay in touch" communications, and even blogging about their travels, but he also mentioned a business, and commercial use of ham radio is prohibited.

    1. Re:Not for business use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . as if anyone would be able to tell or stop him.

  85. EVDO Card by detnyre · · Score: 1

    I live in my RV full time and use Verizon EVDO card while on the road. It works fine as long as there is phone service. If you use a cellular amplifier you can extend the distance you need to be from cell phone towers quite a bit - costs around $200.00 Most RV parks and truck stops have WiFi available, but it usually sucks. Most people I know who have/had satellite on their RV don't like it - too slow and too many issues with it and most now use EVDO cards. You can check out my blog at www.dereketnyre.com for more full time rv information. Derek

  86. What are they using on airlines? BGAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the airlines aren't using iridium?

    Some of the cruisers (as in boats = RVers on water) use BGAN with moderate success.

  87. MBR1000 and Sprint Broadband by kdekorte · · Score: 1

    I live in a rural area and I use the MBR1000 and the Sprint Broadband card to do my daily work. It works well and there are several machines at my house connected to this setup. I can even watch movies from Netflix this way. However, Sprint does have a 5GB limit until they start charging you extra, so you need to monitor your usage to keep from getting huge bills or just get a couple of cards.

  88. Seriously, why bother? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    None of the current options are going to give you better bandwidth than simply loading up the RV with backup tapes and taking them with you...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  89. Exactly the opposite by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, it is not. Since I telecommute and I homeschool my child, I have seriously considered packing up an RV and traveling the country. When we want to study the Civil War, we could go spend some time actually visiting historic battles sites. When we want to study the Revolution, we can go to Boston and look at the Boston Harbor. When we study desert ecosystems, we could go to the desert. In fact, for me, I don't want to go RVing to get away from it all. I want to go RVing to get TO it all.

    1. Re:Exactly the opposite by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If I did that there would be too much distraction to keep up with the schooling.

    2. Re:Exactly the opposite by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "When we want to study the Civil War, we could go spend some time actually visiting historic battles sites. When we want to study the Revolution, we can go to Boston and look at the Boston Harbor.When we study desert ecosystems, we could go to the desert."

      That sounds good and all, but Boston Harbor is downtown and is just a dirty body of water loaded with jellyfish. Not exactly a great learning experience. Most historic battle sites are sections of woods with a few plaques talking about what happened. Again, possibly not the best use of time if you actually want to learn something. The desert trip could be interesting, but again, its a lot of effort to learn very little.

      Now I'm not against travel. I went to China for 2 weeks this summer for fun. I also learned a lot. Still, if I was just wanting to learn, I could have done a lot better by reading a few books and saved myself about 35 hours of being squeezed on a plane.

    3. Re:Exactly the opposite by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Are you open to the idea of adoption? If so, how do you feel about age discrimination?

    4. Re:Exactly the opposite by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I should give an anictdote about seeing the awe on my 19 year old cousin's face when she came to visit and saw the ocean for the first time, or if I should crack a joke about nerds living in their basement because they feel that they can get more out of reading a few books than they can by going out into the real world.

      Well, I guess I'll make both.

    5. Re:Exactly the opposite by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Well, if by "how do you feel about age discrimination" you mean "I'm a super hot 25 year old woman", and by "Are you open to the idea of adoption" you mean "I want to do you in every state of the union", then I'm all for it. If not, I will probably have to pass.

    6. Re:Exactly the opposite by Quay42 · · Score: 1

      My wife and I came very close to doing that this year. I worked from home and she didn't work. And since we live in LA, it turns out that it would be cheaper to travel in an RV (considering both the RV mortgage, nightly camp fees, insurance, etc). In the end we opted to not (we have a young daughter), but I still think it's a great idea for someone who has that freedom.

      We also wrestled with the Internet issue and was most likely going to go with Verizon broadband, as the satellite option is quite expensive.

      --
      "Has anything you've done made your life better?" - American History X
  90. anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since there's a "Starbucks" on every corner, just use their service.

  91. Autonet Mobile by emphatic · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what you're looking for: http://autonetmobile.com/

  92. Cellular, EV-DO rules in remote wooded areas by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Verizon (was alltel here until recently) works better in remote areas due to the CDMA technology working better in dense trees and the like, and their CDMA2000 based EV-DO technology is available even in my remote area (3Mbits/sec downlink, and about 1.5Mbits/sec uplink). AT&T (aka Cingular) on the other hand sucks here, drop outs everywhere and has only the slower EDGE (maxes out around 240Kbits/sec downlink and about 60Kbits/sec up). Out here where dsl don't reach and cable don't either, way out in the boondocks where they pump in sunshine, those of us that are in the know use Alltel EV-DO (now Verizon) instead of the slow AT&T EDGE service...not to mention the AT&T GSM don't work this far out anyway, can't even make a phone call outside, with CDMA phones you can even still make a call outside, and even indoors if you want to. So in the remote areas, in cellular, it is no contest, and CDMA EV-DO is available in canada also... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Evolution-Data_Optimized_service_providers

  93. Headline: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "Man who want to get away from it all want's it all to be there when he arrives."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  94. I advise forgetting the RV and traveling by hotel by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Forget the RV and the hotel, I want to hike, with my camera equipment and laptop. With wireless access I could then upload photos and updates.

    And the distance from the hotel to "nature" is typically only half-an-hour.

    I want to get hours if not days away from buildings and wiring. At least something like hiking the Appalachian Trail. Hike it not drive it.

    Falcon

  95. Oh, bother... time for physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the whole "clear view of the southern sky" is because those direct broadcast satellite systems use *geostationary* satellites. In case you hadn't heard of those, they are satellites in a very particular orbit, by virtue of which they are at rest relative to the surface of the earth.

    The thing about it is that there is only one geosynchronous orbit, and it is approximately 36,000 km (22,000 mi) above the equator. It is physically impossible to have a geostationary orbit over any point other than the equator.

    If the satellites are not in geostationary orbit, you cannot use a high-gain directional antenna unless you have active tracking (which is certainly beyond the scope of consumer products). Instead of using high-gain antennas with individual satellites, systems like GPS (except the WAAS satellites), Iridium, and such use multiple satellites ("constellations") for their coverage. This has significant impact on operational efficiencies for bidirectional communications.

    (As an aside, considering the high latitudes involved in Russian satellite communications, they have implemented a very cool pseudo-geostationary satellite system. By placing three satellites 120 degrees apart in the same high-inclination orbit, they can have at least one satellite always within a small cone of the sky. It is not quite as precise (and therefore not capable of quite as high gain) as true geostationary orbit, but it allows for non-tracking relatively high gain satellite systems.)

  96. I've wanted to do this kind of trip by motorcycle! by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    If I could somehow get 2-3 weeks off, and friends that could do the same, and just to the 'iron-butt' ride around a good bit of the US.

    In the US horse would be better. And llamas in South America's Andes.

    Falcon

  97. Can't Have It All, But The Best Would Be... by tunapez · · Score: 2, Informative

    An Alltel USB Receiver w/ unlimited Broadband plan(hint:now running on the Verizon network). I traveled all of the Southwest and most of the Northwest Spring of 2008 for work w/ my VZW phone and VZW unlimited Broadband with more connectivity than I had hoped for...you'd be surprised how often a usable signal can be found in the middle of nowhere in eastern Oregon or BFE, New Mexico. IE: I rarely/barely went more than an hour or so without signal on my travels, longest had to be from Ontario, ID to Bend, OR. Talk about desolate beauty.

    Today I now use the Alltel service at home outside Phoenix metro b/c Qwest DSL here blows, no other hard-line option available and VZW implemented the 5GB cap shortly after I canceled to test drive Sprint's(VZW broadband blew Sprint away in my travels, despite what I had heard to the contrary). I was on a borrowed VZW USB when I moved in to my rural dome home and have found since that Alltel's broadband(still no cap on new plans, yay!) is actually more reliable and faster than VZW...and it's VZW's network, go figure.

    One more plug for VZW's network(I love/hate them, btw): I spent 3 weeks in July 2008 camping in Chevelon Canyon, AZ(up around the north crossing), and found a signal on a rise in the forest road 30 rough miles from the nearest civilization. I walked 1.6 miles from base camp every other evening to check messages and make calls. Mom didn't have to worry and work required me to VNC twice by driving to the site and using my laptop, a cheap 400w inverter and my truck's battery. Talk about getting away.

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  98. It Pains me to suggest... by Escape+From+NY · · Score: 1

    3G is really the best you can hope for. It's quick and easy to set up. You don't have to point a dish every time you stop. And you can expect some coverage while you're driving down the the highway.

    Now the part I hate to admit. You're best bet for 3G would be with a company called Millenicom. You can get service on either the Sprint or Verizon backbone for 59-69 a month with no contract. The Verizon network will get you a 5Gig cap, people on Sprint are still unlimited, and they have a new unlimited plan with limited coverage.

  99. What kind of blasphemy is this, by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    advocating common sense on Slashdot!?

    Except it's not common sense. Common sense says a person doesn't need to be always connected. I know when I'm out hiking, with my camera equipment and laptop, I'd like to be able to upload photos and updates occasionally. I oppose being always available but connecting perhaps once or twice a day may be good.

    Falcon

  100. well aren't you just Father of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is not. Since I telecommute and I homeschool my child, I have seriously considered packing up an RV and traveling the country. When we want to study the Civil War, we could go spend some time actually visiting historic battles sites. When we want to study the Revolution, we can go to Boston and look at the Boston Harbor. When we study desert ecosystems, we could go to the desert.

    In fact, for me, I don't want to go RVing to get away from it all. I want to go RVing to get TO it all.

    And what about when you want to study the moon landing? You gonna fly the Mystery Machine through space? I'd like to see you try reaching escape velocity in your RV, you fucking sackless coward.

    1. Re:well aren't you just Father of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of Arizona?

    2. Re:well aren't you just Father of the Year by b3d · · Score: 1

      To study the moon landing you would go to Houston or Orlando. Duh. You sackless dumbass.

  101. Re:I just did this trip: don't bother trying for w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect the same in Canada, with a LOT more space in between the big towns.

  102. If you have a loan on the RV . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can afford the RV, then you can afford the satellite connection.

    If the RV is being purchased with a loan, then get thee to: http://www.DaveRamsey.com, sell the RV and take a vacation you can afford to pay for with cash.

    If you are renting the RV, then you may be able to afford the satellite Internet, otherwise wait until your back in town and use the WiFi or cellular services.

    If you borrowed the RV, then you are fortunate indeed! You may be able to afford the satellite Internet, otherwise wait until your back in town and use the WiFi or cellular services.

    If you have stolen the RV; found it by the side of the road; or otherwise invoked the rule of "finders keepers", etc., then get thee to the nearest Highway Patrol office for a nice meal and a good nights sleep!

    If you have built your own RV, you may be able to afford the satellite Internet, otherwise wait until your back in town and use the WiFi or cellular services.

    Anyway, enjoy your vacation and AVOID THE IDIOT MORON DEMOCRATS THAT LEAVE THEIR DUNG TRAILS HERE ON SLASHDOT!

  103. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    It is great that you can take off work for months at a time and still be able to afford to pay your bills. For the vast majority of people, that is not the case. This submitter is looking for a way that he can continue to work, while at the same time travel the country. The fact that this person could even consider this means that they already have far more leeway in their travel time that the vast majority of people.

    The above sarcasm about you not having to have a job aside, you are probably just missing the point do to lack of imagination. This person isn't trying to take work on his 1 or 2 week vacation that he gets a year. He is trying to get an extra 6 or 12 months of travel and exploration ADDED to the 1 or two weeks a year that he already takes that don't include work.

    So, who is in the worse position. /.er A who gets two weeks away from it all, and 50 weeks of travel where every other week he gets to explore a new part of our country, or /.er B who get two weeks away from it all?

  104. My recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I would highly recommend getting the Cradlepoint router and attaching a Mobile Broadband card from Verizon. Here are my reasons:

    1 - Verizon currently has the best coverage. Even if you do not always get "broadband" speeds, you should almost always get a connection.
    2 - The idea would be to be prepared for Verizon's new LTE network, which should be available everywhere over the next 18 months - Coverage with this will be even greater, with great penetration since it runs on the 800MHz band.
    3 - Satellite is expensive for a 2-way setup and very difficult to use reliably while mobile.

    Hope this helps!

  105. Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are wanting continuous internet coverage while driving a motor home?
    Sounds dangerous to me. You should be watching the road instead of playing online games/surfing porn/posting on slashdot.

    It would be as bad as a teenage girl driving while texting.

    Plus an out of control motor home can do a lot more damage to other road traffic and roadside structres.

  106. Avoid Canada by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Either avoid Canada or don't expect to have coverage while driving across it. Before I start getting flamed, relax I am Canadian and we all know that we get COMPLETELY SCREWED by Bell, Rogers, Telus, etc. for cellular coverage, data plans and internet usage.

  107. Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His momma has to dance for the money they throw...

  108. Sailmail/Winlink by anethema · · Score: 1

    I'm late so no one is likely to see this, but if you only needed email there are other VERY cheap or almost free options, initial equipment aside.

    If you dont mind paying and do not want to take a HAM radio operators exam, there is something called Sailmail: http://www.sailmail.com/

    You install a single side band radio and pactor modem and you get email coverage anywhere on earth for about $250 a year.

    If you don't mind the amateur radio exam, you can just use Winlink: http://www.winlink.org/

    This is free, only having to pay the initial costs of the SSB/Pactor.

    Lots of info on both sites as far as setup etc, and the coverage is global.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:Sailmail/Winlink by pearl298 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be a wet blanket, but Sailmail is intended for marine applications and is licensed ONLY in the marine mobile bands!

      That being said, almost every marina in the world now had Wi-Fi, I suspect that most RV parks won't be far behind.

      You will likely need a "high power" or "extended range" Wi-Fi though. In Australia we "pushed" Wi-Fi to over 2 miles for example.

      Even in Indonesia we found Internet Cafe's (4 users on a 56Kb line!)

      If you go to remote places there is still access, but it is either expensive or degraded.

  109. Satellite doesn't need to be expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satellite Internet powered by WildBlueâ
    DIRECTV delivers high-speed Internet (up to 1.5Mbps) powered by WildBlueâ to any home, virtually anywhere in the country. You don't even need a phone line. For as low as $39.99 a month for 12 months (up to 512 kbps) you can keep an "alwaysâ"on" connection â" watch videos and download photos and music. This is the best offer you can get on satellite Internet. And it's available only from DIRECTV. Call 1-800-531-5000 to order

    1. Re:Satellite doesn't need to be expensive by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Wild Blue is just Hughesnet repackaged. They use bandwidth off Hughes's birds. You're still gonna have to deal with the FAP bucket (aka 'Fair Access Policy', which in Hughesnetspeak, it's 'fair' that they'll allow you to get an IP number if you give them money, but don't try to do more than surf & email, or you'll overload the satellite.).

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  110. Weather balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Float a weather balloon up about 2 miles and antenna/repeat off that.
    It should have line of site to several cell towers.

  111. Would this be Neil from Geekbrief? by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    Would this be the Neil from Geekbrief? I thought the Big Trip was abandoned.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  112. Been there done that, here's your answer. by ttroutma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did this for years. Here are the results. You want an antenna adapter for your EVDO card and a Wilson Trucker Antenna. This will bring a moderate signal to five bars. Next step up, a good amp will bring a weak signal to five bars but it will not take "no signal" and make it into a good signal. Even if you have a portable 40' tower (been there done that) you will not operate outside the timing boundary for the cell tower. Summary, unless you are staying inside the people hive, you will need to have a motosat system and all the complexity, power draw, etc, that this involves. Have fun.

  113. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My uncle and a few of my cousins do that once a year. They do rent a satphone to take with them, but it's for them to call out, not for people to call them. At $2/min, they're not doing much calling out either.

    Like they could even if they wanted to, what with all that dick in their mouths.

  114. Australia? by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

    Have you thought about bringing your RV to Australia instead?

    While Telstra advertise that their network "works better in more places" I'm not sure if that includes Canada. YMMV.

    http://www.telstra.com.au/mobile/nextg/

  115. Internet business advertising by hclim65 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thank you for your blog,your blog have a lot of very important knowledge and information.After i read giving me a good experince of all the articles at your site.I will always visit your site in future and i hope i will have a special experince after reading all your important article in your site/blog.Thanks you very much.From business advertising is a effective way to grow your small business plan for consumer products ,industrial supplies & mlm business. hclim@all-business-advertising.com http://www.all-business-advertising.com/

  116. Red Ball Internet by RyDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I highly recommend you check out Red Ball Internet hxxp://www.redballinternet.com They have some pretty sweet highspeed mobile wireless solutions.

  117. You're pretty much stuck with satellite. by AugstWest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only technology that blankets the planet is satellite. No other signal has the reach. It's that simple.

    It isn't just HughesNet anymore, there are other companies in the space (get it?) now too, like WildBlue, Skycasters and some others.

    I would highly recommend picking up a portable satellite setup like you'll find by clicking on my signature. I'm not really shilling for it, it's my father-in-law's hobby business, but he has come up with some pretty cool stuff.

  118. Use Free Smartphone Tethering by ericn32 · · Score: 1

    If you use a Windows phone running an unofficial (meaning not from a regular wireless carrier) ROM from the likes of xda-developers.com, you can tether your smartphone to your PC using USB or Bluetooth without paying extra for those ungodly $60 plans... And if you own any other kind of smartphone, you could use PDANet (works on any smartphone, but you'll have to jailbreak your iPhone if you use it.) The software's 20 bucks but I hear it's worth it. But if you plan on being outside of GSM/CDMA coverage areas, you'll need something like HughesNet. The only problem is that it works only if you're stopped.

  119. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    That thing's nicer than my house.

  120. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I'd say you CAN be intrepid while using a motor vehicle. Sometimes you can't use the vehicle again afterwards though.

    Of course, your point about the bike is right on too. I've been a couple of places where you could barely use the bike again afterwards.

  121. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by brucehowells · · Score: 1

    Their vehicles may be intrepid, but their web server is pretty #&$**!@ Slashdotted at the moment.

  122. Built these for my company, WIB - Wifi in a Box by dougnaka · · Score: 1


    Using the PC Engines ALIX platform - http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm an Atheros based AR5413 802.11abg 500mW mini-PCI card
    External omni-directional antenna
    8GB CF card
    rugged case
    Sprint USB card
    External cellular antenna
    Ubuntu 8.10

    Picture here (opened) http://www.flickr.com/photos/dougnaka/3921609717/
    I think costs were about $500, but would probably be under $300
    I've had one in my car for the past couple months, and it's been constant, roving Wifi.
    Don't take the Sprint cards to Canada though, $5k in one month roaming fees isn't fun ;)

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  123. look here by ricke19999 · · Score: 1

    Try these for answers to your questions from people who've been there and done it already:

    http://www.datastormusers.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/index.html -- primarily mobile satellite internet crowd

    http://www.rvnetwork.com/index.php?showforum=33 -- primarily RVing crowd

  124. BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second the comment on BGAN. If your business relies on it, you can use 3G/EDGE/GPRS or an EVDO modem where you can, and skip the big Hughes setup (even though VSAT is way cheaper) and go right for a neat BGAN unit. They're quite versatile.

  125. staying in contact by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Regularly is one thing. I like having an iPhone that can get my e-mail every few days when I hit some coverage. The "daily connectivity" the poster wants is going to limit where he can go unless he takes a sat phone along.

    A laptop with wireless access can replace the phone. And with IM and or video conferencing, which phones don't do, they can even do more.

    Falcon

    1. Re:staying in contact by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood my post. On the last trip I was on it was kind of a novelty to be able to grab my e-mail when we paddled to an inshore island, and the phone is small enough to actually take along. I'm not going to take a notebook on anything more adventurous than a cushy weekend car camping trip.

      It's nice to have something little like a phone so every few days, if you happen to find a sniff of cell service, you can grab your e-mail. There's definitely no wireless. If you need the whole notebook/video conferencing thing and pretty much constantly connectivity then you're going to be severely limited in where you can go.

  126. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by ahoehn · · Score: 1

    You know your webserver's got problems when you can't even handle a comment-slashdotting. Apparently you sell $400,000 RVs that can survive a nuclear apocalypse, but you can't afford anything better than GoDaddy for your hosting. Bravo Global X Vehicles.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  127. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by cptdondo · · Score: 1

    Heh. you really need to play with some all-terrain fire fighting equipment.

    http://www.gimaex.eu/?Mod1=artikel&MainMenuID=2&Sprache=GB&MenuID=556

    Now convert that into an RV and you have an intrepid vehicle.

    As to the OP, hire some good employees, or get an arrangement with someone you trust, and then drive like hell until you have no cell coverage. That's what I do.

    [true story] we hired a new engineer, first hire. Left on a 3 week vacation to Europe, left him in charge. He's the only person in the office. No sweat, this guy was really competent. Except that a week after we left, a hurricane hit and he had to evacuate the office, with all of the files, computers, and such. And after that, he couldn't get the network going again. So he calls us - in the Czech Republic. Gets our neighbor who speaks no English. He babbles on in broken Russian - our neighbors speak no Russian either; after a while they figured out he must want the Americans next door.

    Bottom line, he did fine, we had a great vacation, and we all had a great laugh about it when we came back.[/true story]

    Hire good people and go away. Far, far away, or the business will eat your soul.

  128. You might want to get a Starbucks gold card by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    as a fall back plan. It costs $25/year. You can get 2 hours of wifi at any starbucks with it per day. (I don't work for Starbucks and I don't own any of their stock).

    In cooperation with ATT Barnes and Noble offers free unlimited wifi.

    Falcon

  129. Might want to talk to these folks. by hullabalucination · · Score: 1

    You might want to forward your question(s) to these folks:

    http://wilsonelectronics.com/

    I don't have any affiliation with Wilson, and I don't do Internet in the field, but their cellphone amps and antennas have enabled me to establish voice service with cellular towers many miles further away than what I normally could when I'm out doing nature photography in remote parts of the U.S. Southwest. Their gear is also said to be popular with long-haul truckers who need cellular access in remote areas. They may just be able to recommend a setup (typically an amplifier/antennna combo) that will put you in business for terrestrial 2G/3G services. Do note that even with my kit, I still find black holes; they're just not as huge as they would be with a non-amplified phone.

    * * * * *

    Error 416: Sig not found.

  130. You should probably just stay home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole idea of "roughing it" is over your head, isn't it?

    Why don't you try to raise your threshold for boredom just once and see what happens?

  131. the Boundary Waters Canoe Area by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I haven't been in the Boundary Waters area except driving up the North Shore between Duluth and Thunder Bay.

    If you want something moderately challenging then leave at home all your electronics and canoe/portage 50 miles into the Boundary Waters Canoe Area [wikipedia.org] for an intrepid vacation. Trust me, to see land so pristine was a near religious experience and I definitely went back.

    You may not but I would want my electronics with me, as well as broadband wireless access. I'd want to photograph and write about it.

    Go white water rafting or mountain hiking or get dive certified.

    One of the certs I want to get, to get my master cert, is photography. Years ago a friend used to dive and chart caves, and I thought of making that another cert. Combine the two, cave diving and photography, and having broadband wireless would be terrific.

    Falcon

  132. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    If you want to get away from EM I'd suggest you stay out of view of the sun :\

    Well, you can get out of the sun in the Boundary Waters area. I don't know if it is a virgin area but the area is pretty well forested.

    Falcon

  133. RV parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to point out. like hotels. RV parks offer wifi for free.

    so you're probably a newb RV user. and havent actually been to rv parks, nor turned on a laptop and scanned for wifi at one either.

    the technical solution is always the simplest.. park it where WIFI is free. and quit being a newb.

    if you want while your in motion, cell phones will give you email capability.some web but it's shotty at best. and that's enough.

    I'm so glad I'm retired and know all the in's and out's of vacations...

    did you know they had wifi on most cruise ships for a crisp 50 you get about 30 minutes of it. but it's worth it if you have to upload your shit to flickr.

  134. Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RVing? Seriously? Just don't and the environment will thank you.

  135. Stay at campgrounds that offer Wifi, problem solve by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Does KOA have campgrounds with wifi along the Appalachian Trail?

    Falcon

  136. insane by despeaux · · Score: 1

    I just think you're insane. You want to go into the remote wilderness in an RV and you're actually worried about latency for your freakin' GAMES? My suggestion: just stay home.

  137. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by excelblue · · Score: 1

    Y'know, the real reason why they built this thing is probably to inspire behavior that results in increased demand on the hospital.

    Car accident treatment plan? One low monthly price with reasonable overages?

  138. Fixed Wireless Terminal - Ericsson W35 by double07 · · Score: 1

    I would recommend a fixed wireless terminal like the Ericsson W35 unit: http://www.ericssonw35.com/ They support 3g and 2g networks. 2100/1900/850mhz and 2100/1900/900mhz 3g flavours available depending on your preferred carrier. Built in wlan and lan switch makes it pretty easy to connect all your devices. Best of all you can hookup an external antenna to boost your signal. We use these a lot on remote mine sites etc. and they're quite robust and solid enough to keep up an ipsec tunnel 99% of the time.

  139. the intrepid RV'er by quenda · · Score: 1

    Isn't "the intrepid RV'er" an oxymoron?

    1. Re:the intrepid RV'er by natehoy · · Score: 1

      In general, yes, but if you drove your RV down a logging road for 20 miles where there's a real risk of getting permanently stuck and/or rolling it over, I'd call that "intrepid". :)

      But, yes, the original story is someone I would not describe as "intrepid". LOL

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  140. 3G, MBR-1000 is best option by dublin · · Score: 1

    You simply can't get all of what you want, but here's my advice, based on building a number of mobile networks for a variety of business clients:

    Forget satellite unless you *really* need connectivity anywhere. It's expensive, complicated, expensive, the latency sucks, and it's expensive. Seriously, if you want to remain connected in Southeast Louisiana (which we judged as "more remote" than the Arabian desert for one project), then satellite's your solution, but the drawbacks are such that even then, it's an adjunct, not a primary solution - if any other network is available, you'll want to use that instead, anyway. Oh, and did I mention it's really, really expensive?

    Wireless 3G is your best bet right now. Based on real-world experience (designing networks for deployment to restaurants nationwide), I *strongly* suggest a CDMA network: Sprint first, followed by Verizon as #2. I looked and tried a number of options, and Sprint definitely offered the best chance of a stable, high-speed network connection. Verizon wasn't bad, but fast connections seem much harder to come by on Verizon than Sprint, especially in remote areas. (Also, remember that Sprint now offers combined 3G/4G aircards, so you can use WiMax, if you ever expect to find yourself in a WiMax city. I'd be thrilled just to have Austin as a WiMax city, myself...) Avoid AT&T like the plague of iPhones that has their network gasping for its last breath. Seriously, even before the iPhone, AT&T's data network was far worse than Sprint's, and although it's much better now, I think they've slipped even further due to not keeping up with the iPhone hordes. IMHO, T-mobile and other carriers don't really have the broad footprint required to be an "almost anywhere" solution. You'll still have no connection in remote areas, but the only fix for that is satellite, with all the problems noted above.

    I've deployed many Cradlepoint MBR-1000s, and recommend them highly. This is the "professional" approach as opposed to the "consumer" type MiFi devices - this approach gives you much more smarts in the router, plus using an external aircard lets you add an external 3G antenna, which can make a *huge* difference. Yes, you could also roll your own and save a little bit. No, it's not worth it. IMO, the Cradlepoint is worth twice what it costs.

    With a good external 3G antenna, the MBR-1000 and a good aircard is the best solution available today for remote high-speed Internet. BTW, I recommend Sierra Wireless aircards for a couple of reasons: 1) They work better with the Cradlepoints than other brands, and 2) some Novatel aircards are a royal PITA to set up. I've had good experiences with 3Gstore.com for external antennas and Cradlepoint support. Make sure your aircard supports external antenna connections, and that you can get a connector for it (these are far from standard right now). Finally, although 3G latencies are orders of magnitude better than satellite, they are still much higher than landline networks - VoIP isn't really practical, for instance. Fortunately, these networks natively support voice traffic for cellphones as well, so it's really not much of an issue. ;-) BTW, speed on these networks is pretty decent - in my last startup, we used a Sprint 3G/Cradlepoint connection as our primary Internet connection for a small office (3-6 users) for a year and a half, with only occasional bandwidth snarls.

    I'd never want to travel again without my Cradlepoint PHS (kind of like the MiFi, but uses an external USB aircard)- it's just way too handy to be doing the multitasking-in-the-car thing like what's shown in that new Sprint commercial...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  141. My recent experience by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    I tried to do this back in July going from Arizona to Montana and back. My weapon of choice was a *cough* tethered *cough* iPhone and a Macbook Pro. The results were spotty at best. You don't get 3G anywhere but in the confines of a major city. In my case that was Salt Lake. Everywhere else you had to have Edge at least or you got nothing. When I did have Edge I found I was at the mercy of limited bandwidth. In one campground I barely got anything because there were a couple of teenagers next door texting constantly (my theory). As soon as they went to bed I got usable performance and by usable I mean I could check my e-mail but that was about it. Many campgrounds now have WIFI which is good...when it's working and if you're parked in a space that's far away from the office, you're SOL. I have heard of a satellite system that has the ability to track while moving but I imagine that it's not cheap.

  142. Re:Intrepid? RV'er? It Hurts. by really? · · Score: 1

    > I'm sorry if your health doesn't permit this but I personally don't find anything intrepid about a recreational vehicle.

    I am sorry you are limited in your thinking.about what an RV is, and what you can do with one. As a rather extreme example see here http://www.unicat.net/en/pics/EX70HDQ-MANTGA6x6-2.html

    Not all RVers are old people keeping to the main roads and RV parks.

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  143. Re:I advise forgetting the RV and traveling by hot by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    >>>I want to get hours if not days away from buildings and wiring.

    There's no such place in North America. Even along the Alaska Highway, which is pretty desolate, you're never more than a half-an-hour's drive away from humans and their buildings. And you mentioned the Appalachian Trail - well almost the entire length of that trail is only a short drive from the nearest interstate (I-81) or state highway.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  144. airwaves by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Because amateur radio bands are narrow and would be quickly swamped by commercial traffic. If you want to piss somebody off by using their frequencies I suggest you co-opt analog TV channels.

    Ah, there's the riddle, er problem. Originally the airwaves, with court approval, were homesteaded. In any given area people could set up transmitters and broadcast on an unused frequency. In short courts were assigning homesteader's rights to those who first broadcast on a frequency. If someone else came along and started broadcasting which interfered with the first broadcaster then they could be forced to stop the interference. Big companies came along and didn't like the competition and so were successful in lobbying the government to require broadcasters to be licensed.

    So radio frequencies were taken away from homesteading broadcasters and given to large businesses.

    Falcon

  145. I think you misunderstood my post. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    On the last trip I was on it was kind of a novelty to be able to grab my e-mail when we paddled to an inshore island, and the phone is small enough to actually take along. I'm not going to take a notebook on anything more adventurous than a cushy weekend car camping trip.

    And I think you misunderstood my point. I used to carry backpacks weighing about 100lbs and hike all day long. As a college student I rode my bike 8.6 miles to campus, and other places, carrying a backpack weighing 50 or more pounds. Back then weeks I didn't ride at least 100 miles was more unusual than weeks I rode 200 or more miles. And that was in addition to other physical activities such as practicing martial arts, running, and swimming and diving.

    It's nice to have something little like a phone so every few days, if you happen to find a sniff of cell service, you can grab your e-mail. There's definitely no wireless. If you need the whole notebook/video conferencing thing and pretty much constantly connectivity then you're going to be severely limited in where you can go.

    It's also nice being able to document trips and being able to upload those docs once in a while. Constant connectivity isn't needed but connecting once or twice a day to upload photographs or a hiker's blog update would be terrific.

    Falcon

  146. No offense... but shouldn't selection play a roll? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Just because you take 8000 pictures, doesn't mean you need to upload 8000 pictures, or that anyone really cares about 95% of them (if that isn't the point then why upload them?)

    Even if it's only one photograph that's uploaded it still needs connectivity as well as a way to upload the photos. I suppose a digital camera and cellphone both with Bluetooth could be used to upload individual photos, if there is cellphone access. However the practical speed of Bluetooth 2.0 is 2 megabits per second whereas the cheaper camera I'd like to get has a 21.1 Megapixel sensor and can generate files 60MB. At 2mbs it could take a while to upload a photo. Bluetooth 3 may offer faster speeds however it was only approved in April 2009 so there aren't many products with it, then the cellphone and service has to support the same speeds and I haven't heard of one. Verison's and ATT's wireless offerings are faster but they require the card to be plugged into a laptop. Once plugged in will there be connectivity though?

    I also am a technophile and photo buff (not very good, but I try), but also don't mind the lack of connectivity, I actually find it somewhat refreshing. I am also sure that most of my friends like it as well, since it gives me time to select only the pictures that I like.

    There may be tymes I would find the lack of connectivity refreshing but I want to be able to decide when that is and as long as connectivity is available and the equipment that allows it can be turned off I can have it. I do that now, it's not often but I occasionally turn off my cellphone, such as when I go to the movie theatre.

    Only if other's would do the same, if they have to have the phone on then turn the ringer off and use the vibrator then when a call comes in leave the audience to answer the phone. As you can probably tell that pisses me off. Which is why I turn mine off.

    If you can't upload or transfer photos what do you do when your cards are full?

    I'm not insulting your preferences, I'm just questioning the universality of them. Pictures (and blogs, surprisingly enough) benefit then most from not being able to harbor your "post it" influences.

    As a professional photographer, I'm not now but I want to start a photography business, I'd like to be able to upload photos while out in the field. Just because I upload them doesn't mean I'll use or even keep them, however by uploading to my server when I get into the studio I can weed out those to be deleted from the keepers. It reminds me of a saying I like, "the only stupid question is the question that goes unasked."

    Falcon

  147. Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I traveled in and RV for 2 years while working. I used the Verizon broadband card and, if that didn't work, used the rv resorts' wifi. Verizon kicks you off frequently though. IMO, it's not practical to boonedock in the middle of nowhere and expect signal. most of the national forests have rv parks, which in turn have wifi. so either don't travel to "nowhere", or expect a day off now and again.

  148. Living the life by Homo+Stannous · · Score: 1

    I am doing exactly what the OP wants to do. I've been living in my RV (29' 5th wheel trailer) for 6 months, and I'm typing this post over my satellite connection from the northern Cascade mountains in Washington. Here is what I have learned:
    1) Satellite is the only way to go when you get out in the boonies. When we started this trip, I had an Openmoko phone as a backup ISP, but I dropped the data plan 2 months later because I almost never had connection.
    2) Hughesnet is the only affordable satellite provider. Some other companies resell Hughesnet service. I use Motosat, which caters to the RV market. You will probably have to use a reseller, as Hughesnet's own TOS doesn't allow mobile use and they don't want you as their customer.
    3) You can get an ordinary residential Hughesnet dish and mount it on a tripod, but aiming that dish is a royal PITA. www.maxwellsatellite.com sells dish, tripod, and pointing gear as a combo for IIRC $500. But it's still a PITA to point (the record holder from their user's group did it in 5 minutes), and vulnerable to theft. I wouldn't consider it an option if you are going to be moving frequently. A better setup is a roof mounted tracker, like what Motosat makes. Their motorized, and usually acquire the satellite in under 5 minutes with no help from the user. But you're going to have to pay: new systems cost $5k. I got mine used off eBay and installed it myself for $2k. Soldering Iron not required, but expect to cut and crimp a little cable, and of course you have to do the roof mounting. The hardest part was lifting the dish up onto the roof, because it's 80lbs with mount.
    4) Contrary to what some other poster said, these dishes are NOT comparable size to TV dishes. They are larger, because they need to transmit info back to the bird. They start at 0.74m diameter. This means that pointing them is harder than pointing a TV dish, and they absolutely cannot be used while in motion.
    5) Do not buy an RV with a rubber roof. Just don't.
    6) Are you using solar power? I do, and it's worked out quite well. I could give you some tips if you want.
    My recommendation would be Hughesnet with a motorized tracker, and a 3G phone if you need connection while moving on the highways. You can learn more about my experiences with the technomadic lifestyle at http://lauralan.livejournal.com/

  149. There's no such place in North America. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    >>>I want to get hours if not days away from buildings and wiring.

    Even along the Alaska Highway, which is pretty desolate, you're never more than a half-an-hour's drive away from humans and their buildings. And you mentioned the Appalachian Trail - well almost the entire length of that trail is only a short drive from the nearest interstate (I-81) or state highway.

    True* but there are in other parts of the world. Even as a teenager, a lifetime ago, I wanted to take a trek through the Himalayas. Now I'd like to trek through the Andes and Siberia as well. Right now I'm hoping I can go to Brazil as part of a study abroad program in college, and while there I want to go into the Amazon and hike the Andes.

    *Oh and I just mentioned the Appalachian Trail because people still hike it. And as another poster said above there are places out west, I think parts of Montana was specifically mentioned, without even cell phone access.

    Falcon

  150. Cellular with an amp *if needed* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cellular data. And an amp, *if needed*. Don't look at AT&T's coverage map, their 3G coverage is a joke. Look at Verizon's. (Note, Sprint roams on Verizon too, so you could get a Sprint data plan if you prefer; both have the same 5GB cap and same price though, so unless you have a discount with one or the other it really doesn't matter.)

              Get a Mifi, this is an EVDO device that shares the connection via wifi. This is like $100 any more (with 2 year contract). An amp is like $500. If you look at the CDMA coverage maps, there's not THAT many areas that are uncovered AND have roads running to them. But, the amp will improve your speeds when you are in fringe -- my EVDO speeds stay pretty uniform on my aircard when my phone shows anywhere from 1-4 bars.. when the phone drops from 1 bar to 0 bars, the aircard drops from ~1mbps to 256kbps.. (Then just a bit further, the phone and card lose EVDO and I get like 64kbps from a fringe 1X signal.. Before my area got EVDO, I'd get 80-128kbps usually on 1X.)

  151. New Business Model... by AtomicRhino · · Score: 1

    Walmart to sell Wi-Fi in its parking lots!

  152. Been at the rving bit years now by tonicbigal · · Score: 1

    Seen the ups and downs of users with the Monostat and Hughes satellite dishes. Got offered one to put on my rig and refused it. I pretty much use the verizon broad band system. very few times I have been out of luck without having to drive a few miles to a major highway if no cell towers around and pick up the single there. Been in several areas with folks that have the satellite dishes. when we travel in groups we do make up own net with these units so folks can piggy back I stopped at a big rv show and verizon offered me the 3G Mifi broadband card since a loyal users for 5 yrs now to test. Impressed Had three computers up today on one card (mac and pcs). Only draw back if you use a vpn account you need to hook the Mifi card directly with the laptop. So I upgraded to this unit. As for campgrounds or other public areas there are ups and downs to that. Unless there is a good secure system then I would have worries. Set up as a volunteer a secure system with a limit on up loads and downloads so all could have decent speed and was not expensive to do There is an outfit in New York that has what is needed to boost just about anything for incoming or outgoing signal Using a broad band card or iphone etc this system could be handy for some. We are talking a boost of several miles. Some of us work as remote workers on call across the country so this life suits us well even with the budgetary ups and downs as a result of some added expenses like fuel- Not many places we cannot be. Do not need a fancy dancy rig or trailer.

  153. Two mobile 'pioneers' by ehud42 · · Score: 1

    Between 1983 and 1986 Steve Roberts travelled around America on a bike with a laptop (Tandy) 5w solar panel and a packet radio. Used payphones for dial-up. May have been the 'inventor' of texting while driving.

    and between 2002 and 2004 Teresa and Sterling were road warriors in a modified 2003 Lance 1121 on a 2004 Ford F-550 (they upgraded while on the road). Their primary network connection was a MotoSat DataStorm which seemed to work well when stationed.

    As for VoIP while on the road - carry a cell or sat phone and use call forwarding when not in range of a decent Internet signal. With some verification of priorities (sacrifices) you can be mobile and the envy of geeks everywhere.

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
  154. Union Aerospace Corporation did it for cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get infinit network access on my PDA, because the network and DNS is all cobbled to a multi-roughted real-time peer information service where as long as the long chain of PDA's are within range of eachother then one of them can pass the packets back to a DSL router to breakway into the WLAN Internet of commercial crap that we all remembered when left for nature. Only now what works better is some nerds decided to use weather balloons of Linksys solar-powered UPS'd routers to span the globe. Works wonderfully well.

  155. That's a lie that Ham is not for commercial use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, the callSIGN given facilitated through FCC is a muniment of title to make and distinguish commerce of it. What exactly do you mean by commerce? You don't need a Ham Radio License when you are using the tranceiver to coordinate assistance (for which FCC refers to as "help"). I can use the radio for whatever the fuck I want to use it for. First they tried to regulate Ham, but there were too many obominably proud faces that a bunch of old men would blindly bequeaf to some foreign corporation in a foreigh state. Then they tried to regulate VHF, and I don't own VHF because it's cancer-nasty. Then while they were raping VHF operators for Feedom, they came for CB Radio but noooooo -- ol' John Rebel, Mud Duck, Smokey, Cuntpuncher, and Wingnut over-pulled the FCC's push into a trench of profanity and jettisoned those Regulatory Litigious suckers of Satan's cock into a blackhole so fucking goatse-deep that they/FCC lost control over the more polite and undomesticated VHF tweens. But oh no, the ol' men on Ham radio just keep asking for that FCC cock to screw the more the merrier for the sake of orderly communication in a disguised copyleft comercial medium of code exchanged by craft FCC legislation.

    Like I said before, the legislation on Ham Radio operators is that they explicitly don't need to be regulated or need a license if someone is requesting "help", so I always begin my transmittals with a circular sentence of assistance to break the radio silence;

    Cuntpuncher: KFC1337 or anyone monitoring, this is Cuntpuncher requesting help to test a theory of operation?
    KFC1331: KFC1331 monitoring.
    KFC1337: this is KFC1337 how may I help you?
    Cuntpuncher: Help suck my vulva. Help me paint my house. Help me eat a strapon cock. Help me find out what time it is. Help me pick up my kids from school before the ex-husband gets there first. It's urgent to the schedule as expected. Help me..now.

  156. She's/He's right. Commerce is questionable alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing concerning commerce is communication maid on someone's behalf or aquiring a rate of for-sale time secured by someone for monetary gain. But consider this scenarior occuring;

    Wimpy: I will balance your time given me on a Tuesday if you help me take-out the trash today.
    Cuntpuncher: You can help my scale in CJ's, not VJ's (those give me rug burns).