Slashdot Mirror


The Kindle Killer Arrives

GeekZilla sends coverage from Wired's Gadget Lab on the Nook, Barnes & Noble's first e-book reader. "Sleek, stylish and runs the Android OS. What's not to like about Barnes and Noble's new e-book reader? Despite the odd name, the Nook looks like an eBook reader that would actually be a worthwhile investment. Best feature? The ability to loan e-books you have downloaded to other Nook owners. The reader, named the 'Nook,' looks a lot like Amazon's white plastic e-book, only instead of the chiclet-keyboard there is a color multi-touch screen, to be used as both a keyboard or to browse books, cover-flow style. The machine runs Google's Android OS, will have wireless capability from an unspecified carrier, and comes in at the same $260 as the now rather old-fashioned-looking Kindle." Here is the B&N Nook site, which is still not visible on their front page and has a few non-working links. (Nook.com isn't set up yet.) Their comparison page takes dead aim at the Kindle. Among the advantages in the Nook's column: Wi-Fi, expandable memory via microSD, MP3 player, and PDF compatibility. (But remember the cautionary note B&N struck six years back when they got out of the e-book business.)

542 comments

  1. i'm not paying $250 to buy books by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i'll buy the paper books or download them on my iphone via the kindle or B&N reader apps. loaning books sounds like a good option and i hope they bring it to the B&N iphone app. with websites like Goodreads that link to facebook, it can be a viral marketing strategy

    1. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought the $199 Sony reader and love it. E-ink is a big improvment over LCD screens for reading. Note - still wading through free book downloads from legimate sources - there are tons of reader-compatible free books out there.

    2. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      i'll buy the paper books or download them on my iphone via the kindle or B&N reader apps. loaning books sounds like a good option and i hope they bring it to the B&N iphone app. with websites like Goodreads that link to facebook, it can be a viral marketing strategy

      These will be instantly obsolete when someone (Apple?) perfects the tablet, single purpose devices won't be competitive. Of course this is just my opinion but the only real advantage I see is e-ink and that won't cut it against a multi-purpose reading, browsing, etc. device unless you're a publisher who does nothing all day but read.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    3. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you ever tried to read an entire book on an iPhone? I get serious eyestrain after about 30 minutes, I can't imagine sitting there with that light shining directly into my eyes for hours at a time. The real strength of e-book readers is not the whizbang features, all of which are easily duplicated in any given smartphone, but rather in the screen itself, which is conducive to reading for extended periods of time with, in theory, no more eyestrain than a regular book.

      Having said that, I'm still not ready to jump on the e-book bandwagon. The price is still a tad high, and there's too much uncertainty with the distribution models out there, like Amazon's deal with being able to arbitrarily revoke access to your own books and whatnot. Once they can give me a standard open e-book format that allows me to download books from anywhere, for pay or not, and keep them forever, and once they sell the readers at sub-$200 prices, I'll probably take the plunge.

    4. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      I get serious eyestrain after about 30 minutes, I can't imagine sitting there with that light shining directly into my eyes for hours at a time.

      Millions of people stare at an LCD screen all day long for their work without issues - you're probably staring at one right now to read this page - we're really quite inured to it by now. Think for a second how long you spend reading each day, and how much of that time is spent reading an LCD screen as compared to paper - for many people the proportion is already over half their reading time being spent with a computer monitor.

      E-ink, and devices which try to use part eink part lcd as does the nook, will not survive comparison with a flexible device which can function as a book reader *and* a mini computer. If it means you get decent response time, colour for media like photos and video, the ability to even play videos, and a decent web browser, plus the bonus of running whatever other apps you like on the device (think email, web based apps, games etc), I think you'll find most people go for the more flexible option.

      I suspect Apple's tablet will be full colour, and it'll blow away all these e-ink one-function book readers - the only thing holding back devices like the iphone/ipod is the screen size, otherwise with the touch screen they're a perfect reading device.

      Great to see competition hotting up in this space though - this one looks far more elegant than the kindle, and is a definite step up - also it runs Android, definitely a bonus.

    5. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Rary · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i'm not paying $250 to buy books

      That's not really that much. I spent more than that on my bookshelves, and they're not even portable.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    6. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please. Every touchscreen phone has capability for books. The difference here is that for reading you need something bigger. By the time any company "perfects" the tablet, nobody will care.

      Also here you have android, so you can probably run the B&N software on your android phone (very likely). Also means you can probably run android apps and run android features, especially over wifi.

      Thus, this thing has way more potential than competition's devices. It's not that someone else can't compete better than B&N which is well possible, but that B&N's device easily competes better than the kindle. Raising the bar, really.

    7. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by rm999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would have agreed with you until I got a Kindle as a present. I have started reading a lot more because of it. Its e-ink screen is much better than an iPhone (I don't want a flashlight shining directly into my eyes when I read at night). When I travel, its size is great (fits in my bag much more easily than a paperback).

      Also, I find downloading e-books more convenient than acquiring physical copies of books.

    8. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't agree at all. I'm not going to sit down and read a book on a backlit display, and the usage requirements for when when reading are much different from when I'm programming, browsing the internet, or other laptop uses. The competitor to an eBook reader is a book, not a tablet display.

    9. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My issue isn't with LCD DPI abilities, it's the fact that the iPhone screen is tiny. That's why the iPhone, for me, is a useless device for reading e-books. The glossy screen doesn't help much, either.

    10. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Staring at a 20 inch LCD screen and a 4 inch screen are two different things to be fair.

    11. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by flajann · · Score: 1
      The Standard EBook format is called.... PDF!

      Quite frankly, I don't see a need for yet another document format. PDFs work everywhere, and have been around for a while. It can render anything you can hope to find in a book anyway, so what more do you need?

    12. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, next month we'll see the release of the next-gen "Cranny".

    13. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This still isn't the ebook for me. I insist on solar power, for one thing. I also want to be able to hold it in my hands like a regular book. So the recently announced LG reader I find more interesting than this one. But I also want a color screen. So I'll keep waiting....

    14. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by ender- · · Score: 5, Interesting

      These will be instantly obsolete when someone (Apple?) perfects the tablet, single purpose devices won't be competitive.

      This right here is one of my main problems with ebooks. Lets face it, I'm a total technogeek. But I have a real issue moving forward with ebooks. I fully understand that these concerns don't apply to everyone, but here are MYcurrent reasons for sticking with paper books, instead of spending money on an ebook reader, and the ebooks themselves.

      - Battery - Common complaint, my books don't run out of battery

      - Space - I can fit a paperback in my pocket.

      - Durability - Both are ruined by water, but I can bang a paper book around pretty good and it's still readable. Even if I totally destroy a paper book, I'm only out the few dollars it cost me for that book [I buy most books used].

      - Obsolesence - in 15, or 50 years I can give my books to my daughter or grandkids, and they'll be able to read them all or sell them to someone else to read [hopefully not :) ]. There's a good chance that the ebook I buy today won't be readable in 5 years let alone 50.

      - DRM - as above, it's getting better if you can lend them, but when I'm done with my book I can give it to a friend, or sell it back to half-price books. Unless the ebook versions are *significantly* cheaper than the physical books, this is a problem for me. Every couple months I go to Half-Price Books, and pretty much buy their entire sci-fi/fantasy clearance section. I pay an average of about $3.00 for hardcover books and I still have the ability to give it away or sell it after I read it [though I prefer to keep my books]. Ebooks will need to compete with that pricing for me the consider it seriously.

      - Physicality - This is a double-edge sword. On the one hand, it'd be great to have 1500 books in the space of one. On the other hand, I love the look of a wall full of books in my office. I love the different covers. I love the smell of the books.

      - Disaster - If I were about to freeze to death, I could at least burn my books to keep warm. Can't do that with an ebook. :) Ok that's stretching a bit, and I'd probably spend so much time convincing myself to actually set a book on fire that I'd freeze first anyway.

      I think the best thing that could happen, that would get me to buy one of the ebook readers, is if publishers started including the ebook along with the physical book. Obviously this would only be useful to the person who first purchased the book, but still allowing them to give/sell the physical book. And when I do buy a new book, I'd even be willing to pay an extra $1 or so to get the ebook to go along with it.

      With all that said, this 'Nook reader looks very cool. If I found something like this on sale at a significant discount, I'd really consider getting one, even if I just used it to read the huge number of free books available via B&N and other sources. But at the current new price, I'd just as soon buy a bunch of paper books.

    15. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by schon · · Score: 1

      I spent more than that on my bookshelves, and they're not even portable.

      They also can't confiscate your books at the distributor's whim, and can be used even when the batteries are dead.

    16. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by dov_0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before I start just a disclaimer: I am a person who loves reading to the degree that I have on several occasions missed work and social engagements when I got 'stuck' in a book and could not bring myself to put it down until it was finished.

      As much as the price is pretty prohibitive, with the e-ink display and what looks like a nice, unobtrusive interface as well as expandable memory, this is the first e-book reader I've seen that I'd actually consider owning. While e-books have been available for a long time, I've never actually been able to finish reading one. Reading for long periods off any traditional type of screen is a pain in the freckle for a start. To me, screens are generally only good for short articles (up to 10 pages).

      The peculiar interaction one has with a book as one turns the pages is missing as well. I guess the main thing is that a physical book has a very finite space. It only has in it what was printed in it or margin notes etc. It has no internet, advanced search or multi-tasking capabilities. It has a world of it's own. To interact with another book-world you have to put it down and pick up another one. On electronic devices it is so easy to jump from one thing to another and scrape for gems, missing a lot on the way. In a book you have to mine for them.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    17. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by RabidMoose · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just for the sake of argument (though I agree with many of your points), I'll offer up some counter-points:

      - Services - A book can't deliver the newspaper to you, without any need for intervention, or killing trees.

      - Search - e-books make it really easy to find that quote you're looking for.

      - Dictionary - A good e-reader lets you instantly lookup a word that you don't fully understand, in my opinion enhancing overall enjoyment of the book.

      - Book price - If/when bookstores start doing things as they should be done, e-books will be much cheaper than a new, retail copy of a book.

      - As XKCD happily pointed out, a 3G-enabled e-reader is essentially The Guide

      - Obsolescence - Most books sold for this will be in .epub, .txt, or .pdf. I'm absolutely confident that in 5 years, all of these formats will still be easily readable, and if not, there will be many free conversion tools to make them so. In fact, the more of these e-readers that get sold, and the more e-books that people buy for them, the more important this will become, and the more of a "sure thing" this will be.

      Also, I'm trying to talk myself into buying one of these things. It's just so damn cool. Now, by no means will I stop buying new books, or get rid of my old ones, but I also won't feel any guilt pirating/fair use-ing e-books of books that I own or buy. Plus, there's lots of good, freely available e-books out there, even if you don't count Project Gutenberg.

    18. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Trahloc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bah, .EPUB rather use a format designed to conform to my device than force a device to conform to the format.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    19. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Disaster - If I were about to freeze to death, I could at least burn my books to keep warm. Can't do that with an ebook. :)

      But which one are you more likely to MacGuyver a time machine out of?

      --
      :x
    20. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Darkness404 · · Score: 1
      While I agree with your general sentiments I disagree on some of your points.

      - Space - I can fit a paperback in my pocket.

      You can fit one paperback in your pocket, but how about a bunch of University textbooks? A few novels? The paper? A large encyclopedia? If you are only reading one book sure, its more convenient, but if you are a student or read a lot its a lot easier carrying around one e-reader than 3-4 different books.

      - Durability - Both are ruined by water, but I can bang a paper book around pretty good and it's still readable. Even if I totally destroy a paper book, I'm only out the few dollars it cost me for that book [I buy most books used].

      True, but this is the same for all electronics. Its kinda silly for me to argue how CDs are better than an iPod because if I break a CD I'm only out ~7 bucks.

      Obsolesence - in 15, or 50 years I can give my books to my daughter or grandkids, and they'll be able to read them all or sell them to someone else to read [hopefully not :) ]. There's a good chance that the ebook I buy today won't be readable in 5 years let alone 50.

      It depends, but some e-books are in plain text or an open format that will be readable for the foreseeable future.

      What really needs to happen is that publishers need to wake up and realize that people don't want to pay extra for an ebook version of a physical book, especially on older titles. I'm not going to pay $15 or even $10 to read To Kill a Mockingbird even though it was a decent-ish book, if it was around $3 I'd buy it. On the other hand a new book that interested me I'd have no problems spending $10 on the e-book version.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    21. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, I don't see a need for yet another document format. PDFs work everywhere, and have been around for a while. It can render anything you can hope to find in a book anyway, so what more do you need?

      What more you need is a little thing called reflow Your PDF does not work "everywhere." It is formatted for a specific size of paper. Chances are, an electronic reading device (including a computer screen) is not that exact size or aspect ratio. the eBook formats (ePub, eReader, Mobipocket, etc.) all permit reflow of the document to the screen size and dimensions of the reader, allow adjustments in font size, and all kinds of goodies that PDF will not accommodate.

    22. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Disaster - If I were about to freeze to death, I could at least burn my books to keep warm. Can't do that with an ebook. :)

      This concern is unfounded. Lithium-based batteries have been proven - in real world situations - to burn most excellently.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    23. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by icebike · · Score: 1

      These will be instantly obsolete when someone (Apple?) perfects the tablet, single purpose devices won't be competitive.

      Single purpose?

      Where did you see that? Did you miss the part about it being Android, which means they can add functionality easily?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    24. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by WaywardGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are going to be amazing tablet PCs coming soon. With a Pixel Qi display capacitive touch screen, the killer app will be 10" ebook readers that are clearer and easier to read than E-Ink in sunlight, but which do decent color video indoors. I just sent my wish list to a friend I have in marketing at Dell:

      • 10" Pixel Qi display, multi-touch screen, scratch resistant, for awesome ebook reading, or just for use as a netbook
      • Ubuntu Netbook Remix (seriously, nothing else in netbooks comes close)
      • Fast Arm processor with video accelerator. Atom would nice, but ARM is good enough.
      • Competitively priced with Kindle
      • Integration with Google Editions for ebooks, hopefully sans DRM
      • Wifi, bluetooth, a couple USB ports

      • Plastic stand and optional wireless keyboard and mouse that turns it into a low-end desktop computer
      • Insane battery life when used as an e-book reader in black & white reflective mode (days, not hours)
      • Voxin (old IBM ViaVoice) text-to-speech working with ebook reader (Orca and Firefox may be ok)
      • Standard headphone jack, excellent audio quality
      • 1 gig ram, at least 16 gig disk storage, either SSD or hard disk
      • Good speaker and mic for use with Google Voice and Skype
      • Reasonable video camera for Skype

      Yeah... I really want one.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    25. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      My cardboard boxes are free. Of course, they can't be used to show off how intellectual I am.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    26. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm not paying $250 to buy books

      That's not really that much. I spent more than that on my bookshelves, and they're not even portable.

      And I spent $250,000 on my house, which holds books and also is not portable.

      Yet the cost of both of these items -- your bookshelves and my house -- are not relevant to whether $250 for an e-book reader is too much. I agree with the parent post that it is.

    27. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by tftp · · Score: 1

      There are going to be amazing tablet PCs coming soon.

      For me that "soon" was about 2 years ago when I bought Samsung Q1 specifically for reading in bed or on a trip. For me the advantage of a generic PC is huge - it supports every single ebook format under the Sun, it runs Firefox for Web browsing, it plays music and video in any format, and can be used as a slow but functional general purpose computer also.

      Another advantage - for me - is that I like to read in darkness (or nearly so) and the Q1 has just the right range of backlight adjustment. I do not like to read "dull gray on lighter gray" - why to limit yourself to monochrome? Who would want a monochrome Web browser? The battery life of an eInk device is definitely better, but how often you must read far away from an AC outlet?

      I see Kindle, Sony 50x and now Nook as neat devices; however eInk is too slow for my taste, and though a UMPC like Q1 is heavier than the reader, I'm not that weak yet to be bothered. I believe the PC will eventually become as light as a reader, and then single purpose readers will die out like dinosaurs.

      And another killer fact is that I often read books in FB2 format and Nook does not seem to support that. So though Nook looks very nice, it is not very useful to me.

    28. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      - Durability - Both are ruined by water,

      Sometimes. I've dried out a water-damaged book that was personally valuable to me, and it came out halfway decent. Perfect, no, but still quite readable.

      I'd have to unlearn so many habits with eBooks. I suppose it wouldn't be hard to stop gripping my books in my teeth when I'm running out of hands, but I'd have to break myself of my habit of using a bad book to kill flies with. If I'm reading a book I dislike and a fly lands nearby, I'll whack it with the book. Oddly I reflexively won't do this if I'm enjoying the book. So all it'll take is one bad book and one fly and there goes the eBook reader. And if anyone sees me do it, there goes any attempt to live without having something insanely stupid to try live down.

    29. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Nar+Matteru · · Score: 1

      PDF is a format designed to preserve the original page size and layout, while its certainly commonly (read: usually) used with no regards to those, it really really sucks at doing so. html based options like epub are much much better at having the content universally fitted and sized to the device in question. Also, PDF sucks for conversion to other formats as well.

      I've been using a DS homebrew app called DSLibris for a while now, The DS is naturally shaped like a book when held sideways, and it certainly beats paying a lot of money for a dedicated device vs something I already have and use frequently. The top right corner page turning touch controls are also pretty nifty. It does currently lack a few features, like the ability to download/sync with books stored on my PC automatically, although it could easily be done given the DS' wifi functionality. And I'm not paying 250$ just to automate something that can be done fairly easily manually to begin with.

    30. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That convenience comes with a cost I'm rarely willing to pay--the inability to resell, loan, or even give away my books, and the inability for Amazon to guarantee that I'll have access to my purchased books indefinitely (switch devices too many times, and you could hit an invisible download limit set by the publisher.)

      The Nook seems to have taken care of the loaner part. Also, since you can apparently store books on an SD card, I suspect that I also won't have to worry about downloading a book too many times. I'd give up the ability to resell if the book was cheap enough (in other media, I'm typically willing to do this if I get the digital download for 15% of the purchase price of the content on physical media.) Unfortunately, the e-books on Amazon tend to be closer to 60% of the purchase price of the physical book.

    31. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by ZPWeeks · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read Cryptonomicon cover to cover (well, save for the fact that eBooks don't *have* covers) on my iPhone's Kindle app. My paper copy of the book is 1100 pages and I couldn't get too far in because I never lug books around with me. Having it on a device that is already in my pocket - and can be read in the dark - is a huge plus for me. I'm considering a Kindle but I'm not yet sure I'd even carry that around. My eyes don't like the regular display a ton, but it certainly was fine for a couple of hours at a time, especially when I weigh the convenience of having access to a book at all times.

    32. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It's actually much, much cooler than you think. B&N were smart to get the cellular access. A bookstore that fits in your pocket? The people who crap on this obviously don't travel much.

    33. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      I'm 45 years old, which around here makes me an old fart. I remember when the phrase "word processor" meant a dedicated machine designed to do one thing: document editing. In 25 years, the old farts will be saying "I remember when the phrase e-book reader meant a machine designed to do one thing."

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    34. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Kindle runs Linux. Hasn't changed a thing.

    35. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Please. Every touchscreen phone has capability for books. The difference here is that for reading you need something bigger. By the time any company "perfects" the tablet, nobody will care.

      Yes we are very close with touchscreen phones which is why I see these devices relegated to a small niche soon-ish: dedicated text readers. The rest of us will use the perfected tablet (which I always image as a PADD) : large touch screen, wireless connectivity, full computer functionality (video replay, games, etc.)

      Also here you have android, so you can probably run the B&N software on your android phone (very likely). Also means you can probably run android apps and run android features, especially over wifi.

      It's limited by the E-ink screen. Low refresh rates mean applications would have to be more static or would feel clunky at best and would have to adapted to display on a greyscale screen. Basically it would look like an original macintosh. Modern applications like video and gaming are out of the question, unless you'd like something retro like Game & Watch. Again it's a device which will soon find itself pushed into a niche by more versatile products.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    36. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming that an ebook is cheaper than a paper book (it should be - production/shipping cost should be much less), the question is whether a $250 ebook reader would last long enough to save its cost and be a more useful reading device than my iphone or my netbook or my laptop or my desktop or...
      I'd be interested in seeing the numbers. Being able to carry a whole library with me easily would be nice.

      --
      linquendum tondere
    37. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by bhartman34 · · Score: 1
      I think a few of your points are misunderstandings on your part. At the very least, there's another way to look at them.

      - Battery - Common complaint, my books don't run out of battery

      While e-books obviously do have battery limitations, they're not as much of an issue as one might think. My Kindle easily lasts a week at a time with moderate (e.g., a few hours a day reading a book) use. Obviously, YMMV, and things go downhill once you start doing a lot of Web surfing on the devices, but it's not at all like a PMP or an iPhone in terms of battery usage.

      - Space - I can fit a paperback in my pocket.

      You can fit dozens or hundreds of paperbacks on a Kindle. Okay, so it won't fit in your pocket, but it'll fit in a book bag, briefcase, or suitcase easily.

      - Obsolesence - in 15, or 50 years I can give my books to my daughter or grandkids, and they'll be able to read them all or sell them to someone else to read [hopefully not :) ]. There's a good chance that the ebook I buy today won't be readable in 5 years let alone 50.

      I think this one depends a lot on the user. Generally, anything not DRM'd can be converted to another format, so if you really want to stave off obsolescence, you can convert to TXT format (albeit with the loss of graphics that implies). And once you've got your e-book in an open format, it's much easier to secure from damage than a paper book. With a few clicks, you can have multiple copies across several server, so that even the complete destruction of one copy doesn't leave you without the content.

      DRM is a problem, and, although I'm not one of them, I acknowledge that there are some people who are in love with the physicality of books. (I do think, however, that the physicality issue is just a matter of technological shift. There were people, in ye olden days (say, 20 years ago) who loved to write letters and notes to their friends. Now they text and write e-mails. People are much more adaptive than we give them credit for sometimes.)

    38. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it wouldn't be hard to stop gripping my books in my teeth when I'm running out of hands, but I'd have to break myself of my habit of using a bad book to kill flies with.
      Well, the real issue is that you are going to have to break your GF from killing flies/spiders and picking up dog poop with those books that you hold in your teeth.

    39. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read several books on my iPhone (hint: black background, light grey letters, big enough font), and countless more on my pc (regular black letters on white background, large fonts), no problems. Furthermore, I work 7 hours a day staring at a monitor, then come home and stare at another monitor for plenty more hours (as many on /. do, I'm sure), and I've done this for most of my life. I say this without a hint of sarcasm, nor wanting to sound like a jerk, but if you suffer eyestrain from 30 minutes of iPhone reading, then perhaps the problem is on your side and you should consult an oculist, seriously...

    40. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      furniture is so pretentious

    41. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Rary · · Score: 3, Informative

      My cardboard boxes are free. Of course, they can't be used to show off how intellectual I am.

      Of course they can. A messy room filled with towering stacks of cardboard boxes labeled "books" just screams "eccentric genius".

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    42. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      I suspect Apple's tablet will be full colour, and it'll blow away all these e-ink one-function book readers - the only thing holding back devices like the iphone/ipod is the screen size

      That's why the iPhone, for me, is a useless device for reading e-books.

      Couldn't agree more, that's why an LCD tablet would work well.

    43. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I want it to be like my iPod, I want to have 10,000 books with me at all times.

      Set to shuffle.

    44. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is: how big is the display, and how fast does the display refresh?

      When e-ink technologies pioneered, they claimed to take several seconds to refresh each page. Like many fast readers, I can read a page of text in a few seconds, especially if it's a small screen (the size of a paperback book), so spending 1-2 seconds waiting after every 5 seconds of reading would drive me nuts.

      It sounds like the visual equivalent of a touch typist struggling to compose something in real time over a 300 baud modem while connected to the Internet. For those kids too young to remember, that wasn't fun, either.

      Does anyone know if the refresh rates for these devices have gotten better? I loved the fact that I didn't have to stop reading just to turn pages while reading on my old Palm Pilot, (a twitch of my thumb every half-second or so worked nicely), but the display wasn't exactly easy on the eyes.

      The main reason I find reading documents on the web as opposed to on paper is that I can read them so much faster when I can just scroll through them. I typically print out a document when it's getting too hard on the eyes -- usually I underestimate the size of the document by a factor of five or six (ie. the document is 100 pages long when it feels like twenty, which is the real reason my eyes are tired from all that reading).

    45. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by ender- · · Score: 1

      I agree, it is damned cool. :) And your points are all excellent points. But $250 is hard for me to justify. I have a netbook which I can put free books on if I'm traveling. I know some people can't read long on a back-lit screens, and I'm sure the e-ink screens are nice, but I read an LCD all day long at work. Reading one for a few hours on a plane isn't that bad for me personally. Plus I tend to run all my LCD's just a few notches up from the dimmest settings which probably helps.

      In addition, I consider the netbook my HHTTG, if there's 802.11 available. And even if not, I have a smartphone that work pays for that I can use to get info from Wikipedia.

      Don't get me wrong, I *WANT* a good ebook reader and from an initial look I'd probably pick the Nook over the Kindle right now. But the advantages don't yet outweigh the downsides [or price] for me personally just yet.

    46. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by pilot1 · · Score: 1

      It's nothing new though. The Kindle has had free cellular internet (and a barely usable web browser) since it was launched. If B&N let you install additional Android apps, I'm sure the cellular internet will be restricted to their store.

    47. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I've dried out a water-damaged book that was personally valuable to me, and it came out halfway decent. Perfect, no, but still quite readable.

      Electronics survive humidity and moderate water much better than books. A paper book is ruined the first time it's in a backpack that gets rained on. Even touching it with wet fingers will permanently damage it. Electronics, on the other hand, almost always survive this level of wetness without damage. And an SD card will usually survive going through the wash.

      If you really think paper is more durable, try carrying a steno notebook everywhere you take your cellphone for the next few months, taking it in and out of your pocket just as often, etc. The steno won't last a month.

    48. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Bah, .EPUB rather use a format designed to conform to my device than force a device to conform to the format.

      HTML had the same intent, but that aspect of it basically failed, and it was eventually patched up with more tags and parameters to give content authors more control over presentation. Even so, everybody resorted to special versions of content for handheld devices (from Plucker for Palm Pilots to Apps rather than standard web pages for the iPhone). Heck, even slashdot doesn't work at less than 1024 pixels wide (e.g. on a 1024x768 screen with TreeTabs firefox extension). And the Java vision of running an app on anything from a handheld to a mainframe didn't help it too much either.

      Automatic layout simply isn't desirable beyond a fairly narrow range of display sizes.

    49. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by SandieK · · Score: 0

      I agree 100% with your points. Nothing beats sitting in a comfy chair with a good book. One of my hobbies is sifting through used book stores for goodies. I have a ton of books on my ipod simply because thats easier to carry around than a paper back that often reaches 600-1000 pages, and before the ipod touch, I cant count the number of 'why didnt I bring a book???' times I encountered.

    50. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Meski · · Score: 1

      - Durability - Both are ruined by water,

      Sometimes. I've dried out a water-damaged book that was personally valuable to me, and it came out halfway decent. Perfect, no, but still quite readable.

      I've dried out PDAs and they've recovered, probably to a better state than a paper book.

      I'd have to unlearn so many habits with eBooks. I suppose it wouldn't be hard to stop gripping my books in my teeth when I'm running out of hands, but I'd have to break myself of my habit of using a bad book to kill flies with. If I'm reading a book I dislike and a fly lands nearby, I'll whack it with the book. Oddly I reflexively won't do this if I'm enjoying the book. So all it'll take is one bad book and one fly and there goes the eBook reader. And if anyone sees me do it, there goes any attempt to live without having something insanely stupid to try live down.

      You need a more geeky way of dealing with flies. This might be a starting point.
      http://www.jaycar.com/productView.asp?ID=YS5545&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=yes&Keyword1=KJ8

    51. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1
      Books are physically beautiful. I love looking at my hardbacks on the shelf - the artwork on the covers and spines, the smell and feel of the paper. So, while I'm interested in ebooks for (a) reading on planes and in hotel rooms (b) journal articles (c) newspapers & (d)texbooks, I don't want to read literature on them - there's far more pleasure in owning a book and turning the pages.

      Apart from that, bookshelves and books are the main decoration in my tiny flat.

      I guess I wait till the price comes down.

    52. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Disaster

      But wouldn't the electronic components of an ebook be better suited to MacGuyvering shit together?

    53. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by hazydave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree.. this one is pretty cool. Certainly much closer than the Kindle. A couple of things:

      * Book Price -- if B&N follow the Amazon pattern, they'll release ebooks at the same time as hardcovers, for less cash. That's a good thing, for certain, though if you're one of those who waits for the paperback, the price might be a bit more. Not that paperbacks are all that cheap these days, compared to the $9.95 "standard" price for many ebooks.

      * The e-ink is a must right now for readers. Anything that qualifies as "book" has to be readable on the beach, or it's a no-go. These e-ink systems get better in bright light, worse in the dark... they behave very much like, well, ink on paper. There's no power used to keep the image up, just to change pages... thus, 10-days of reading.

      * Also, changing to higher power displays, adding games capability... no! Anyone asking for that stuff ought to look into these things called computers. They already have this stuff. You can already read ebooks on them. Making an ebook reader do this stuff will give you both a bad ebook and a bad computer.

      * The ability to lend it makes for a much better "book" model, naturally without the nasty aspect of having to get that book back from the lendee. Libraries ought to be able to tap into this mechanism, too.

      * SD expansion and direct PDF support -- kudos there! That's a major issue with the Kindle. What's the point of an eBook reader that can't store all your books. Sure, whatever's left out of the built-in 2GB is sufficient for 1500 novels, but once you talk about illustrations (eg, PDFs, even if converted to monochrome or halftone for space savings), you're getting big. I have over 2GB of PDF datasheets for the current hardware project I'm doing at work... it would be fairly cool to have these all on-tap on a device like this (also makes it tax deductible... hmmm...)

      Two big problems still, which really are the same problem. The book model fails if I can't resell the book somehow, if I can't read it on a different ebook reader (though at introduction, B&N is supporting "alternate reader" on way more non-ebook devices than Amazon, and you have to believe Android is going to be on the list soon, given they've already written that code for the Nook already).

      The ePub format is a good move.. XML based, world standard, all that jazz. But ePub still supports the option of a DRM, but doesn't specify a DRM. I'm sure they're using some DRM, perhaps a proprietary one for the Nook. My guess is that the books you buy are downloaded keyed to your Nook, and will be an issue to read anywhere else. I would love to be wrong about this. Hopefully, there's more information on just what they're doing here.

      I really do want to see a "book" model that really behaves like a book. That's a problem on computer systems... too easy to make it copy, which is not what I'm after... I just don't want to give up the rights normally associated with real books. They could certainly facilitate reselling of ebooks online, just like Amazon does today with used books... that would vanish if B&N ever got out of the business, or a different standard prevailed in some years.

      Obviously, this reader will be useful at least for ePub, non-DRMed, for other sources if B&N fails in this can cancels their services... I guess Kindle does that, too, although Amazon's ebooks are proprietary format, and you need Amazon involved to get PDFs on a Kindle.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    54. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      so if it a bad book, you kill flies with it and grip it with your teeth??
      are the flies still there when u grip it??

      should be careful NOT to buy books frm u..

    55. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You don't need to purchase books from Amazon to read them on your Kindle.

    56. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      - Obsolesence - in 15, or 50 years I can give my books to my daughter or grandkids, and they'll be able to read them all or sell them to someone else to read [hopefully not :) ]. There's a good chance that the ebook I buy today won't be readable in 5 years let alone 50.

      -Granpaa my neural interface won't connect to this book, it's broken
      -No honey, this is one of the old books, you have to read it with your eyes
      -What? Really? How do I know how each letter looks like?

    57. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by testadicazzo · · Score: 1
      You know, buying a an ebook reader doesn't mean swearing off ownership of paper books. I own an mp3 player AND a CD player, and a Vinyl player. I still buy CD's and records, even though I mostly listen to mp3/oggs. When someone makes an ebook reader worth buying I will own an ebook reader AND many paper books.

      Currently I download many more books (primarily through project Gutenburg) than I purchase, but I still buy some. I read the downloaded volumes through my laptop, or occasionally I print them out (what a waste of paper). I'm just waiting for an ebook reader I think I'll be happy with for a few years.

      Some of your objections to ebooks are silly, even in the context of currently available readers. Others are reasonable given the technical limitations of current readers, but can easily be overcome in the near future, with only minor technical advances.

      • Battery
      • Well, that's a big advantage of e-ink. Depending on how slowly you read, I think its very likely that, if not now, in the forseeable future, ebook batteries will last longer than it takes you to read even a sizeable book. When they can get the power consumption down so that a photovoltaic cell keeps it charged, that'll rock, but I can see that taking a while.

      • Space: a good ebook reader will fit in your pocket. hundreds of books (or say 5 or 6 books taken on vacation) won't. Advantage: ebook.
      • Durability: Regarding the reader, this is a question of good design and contruction. Regarding the content, there's no reason you can't keep your ebooks forever, if you provide sane storage.
      • Obsolescence: Insist on open exchange formats like plain text, html, or pdfs. This is simply a question of voting with your dollars. It's why you shouldn't buy a kindle. Since the nook and the sony reader at least support PDF's, they might be acceptable.
      • DRM: Don't accept DRM. Many books are available in PDF format, and even more are completely out of copyright and freely available at project Gutenburg. If a publisher doesn't sell an DRM free electronic version of a book you want, buy the paper version.
      • Physicality: Well, for me this is a huge win for Ebooks. I have that same collector instinct too, but my home gets cluttered with all of the books, which are in some cases stacked double and triple deep on my bookshelves. I start to run out of shelf space and just box them up or give them away. In the case of my technical books, I want them mainly as a reference, and would be happy to just have them in electronic format, particularly if I had a good reader for them. Again, ebooks just provide you with more options, they don't take options away.

      What I'm hoping for is a well built ebook reader that lets me underline and scribble notes, something like the Iliad. Unfortunately the Iliad seems to be buggy and poorly implemented, but the idea is a good one.

    58. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      - Services - A book can't deliver the newspaper to you, without any need for intervention, or killing trees.

      This is a valid point, since the issues of resale and long term retention are generally not relevant to newspapers and suchlike. However, it would be useful to be able to keep "clippings" of articles from some magazines. Preferably, they would be exportable in some friendly form for pasting into other documents (even as a visibly watermarked bitmap - no need to encourage plagiarism). FYI, newsprint achieves remarkably high recycle rates, so the slaughter of innocent trees is less than commonly thought.
      For professional journals or special interest magazines, one might wish to keep most copies for extended periods (although ebook readers cannot yet handle the "graphical" variety). I can still read my 1980s Scientific American and my 1970s Trans.I.Chem.E. issues are near perfect. These would be closer to the supply of goods model than the service model.

      - Dictionary - A good e-reader lets you instantly lookup a word that you don't fully understand, in my opinion enhancing overall enjoyment of the book.

      This would be a potential boon to those unfamiliar with the vocabulary of a topic, or those of generally limited vocabulary. On the other hand, it would need to have a damned good dictionary to be of any use to a tolerably well educated adult. I find that there are not many words in the typical 10^5 word "College Dictionary" for which I don't already know the primary few definitions (and know/use many words not in those dictionaries).

      - Book price - If/when bookstores start doing things as they should be done, e-books will be much cheaper than a new, retail copy of a book.

      Based on loss of potential resale, the value of an ebook is the difference between the new price of a printed book and its secondhand price in decent condition. The additional value which might be assigned to a search function, or a dictionary in the reader is essentially cancelled by the limitations in lending and longevity.

      Anyway, I'd argue that the search and dictionary features are provided by the reader and included in its price; they do not come from the ebook. Also, these features will differ in capability between readers which might be able to read the same ebook, so it's incorrect to price them into the ebook. BTW, a search feature I'd like to see in ebook readers is use of boolean operators including the NEAR keyword, just like Altavista used to have, years ago. Actually, I'd like to see it appear in web search engines again (Google, please listen).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    59. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      I've been reading ebooks since about 1996-7. It's not that I don't like paper books, it's because ebooks are more convenient (for me). I started off with Peanut Press which morphed into Fictionwise, which used the ePub format. I've also used Mobipocket software. I have on my Fictionwise bookshelf about 1800 books that I've read and downloaded in zip format to my hard drive for safe keeping. Right now I am using an i Pod Touch which can also read Kindle software.

      The only wish I have would be if the i Pod would also have DRM Adobe reader so I could read books borrowed from the library on it.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    60. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      B&N has purchased Fictionwise and uses the same DRM for their titles. Your book purchase is tied to the credit card you purchased it with. When you open the book it asks for your credit card # and then the book opens.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    61. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until you get new habits, I change the page on my iliad with my nose when I'm lying in bed reading:)

    62. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Its e-ink screen is much better than an iPhone (I don't want a flashlight shining directly into my eyes when I read at night).

      What, doesn't the iphone allow you to adjust the brightness ? Sad. My HTC allows it, and the ereader software allows me to access that control as well as font size, background colour, font colour, blah blah blah. I can easily read at arms length and it doesn't hurt my eyes. And that's on a 320x240 screen. And I don't need a bag to carry it - it fits in a front pocket of my pants. I use what ever mobile provider I want, and I host my ebook collection on my own server, even though I can fit many hundreds of "books" on an SD card. Or alternatively I can go to manybooks.net and download a book direct from there, for free.

    63. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Yes. Just to try it out I've been reading the works of Confucius on the bus/subway when I have time to kill. This makes it limited to usually 30-40 minute chunks, but its been fine for that. I'd never sit around at home though. I like to think of these devices as more of a mobile entertainment device for the subway/bus. I can throw a podcast, a movie, or a book on there and just choose what I'm in the mood for. I'd never really view it as a serious replacement for a TV or a book.

    64. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire - a sufficient number of cardboard boxes filled with a sufficient number of books will still prove beyond reasonable doubt your "intellectual-ism." I'm thinking of a few professors I knew from college and their offices filled with box after box of books.

    65. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've considered getting a e-reader for awhile just because I want to have tons of books and read more. The problem is, I fear I might fall into the trap of "I'm going to buy this exercise equipment so I exercise more."

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    66. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not paying $250 to buy books

      Agreed, me neither. However, I am ready to pay for the chance to give my (vision-impaired) mother the ability to increase the font size on any book she wants.

      I know, most people can read any book just fine, but this is a feature of e-books people rarely mentions.

    67. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I've seen some technical books in open formats very occasionally. Is there much (in-print) fiction available? It would be fantastic if I could buy non-DRM e-books!

    68. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - I charge my PRS-505 about once every two weeks.
      - My PRS-505 fits in my pocket.
      - It's fallen off the elliptical, I've sat on it, and the cats have swatted it off the table multiple times. Works like new.
      - Obsolesence; this is why I really replied. You have got to be kidding. The majority of books go obsolete, and the classics are usually kept and handed down. Why would that change. My copy of 1984 will go to my kids (and so will the non-drm'ed pdf). Why will a file format become dead? I don't understand the idea that in 5 to 50 years, suddenly computers will refuse to open pdf files.
      - Not everyone is in the financial position to support having a wall of books. Some of us are in cramped little apartments and going beyond a few book shelves isn't practical. I know this because I refuse to give up my physical books.
      - Disaster. If you are about to freeze to death, we can burn your books. I can read by the fire.

      I also fully agree, I should get the ebook with the physical book.

      I plan to do an in-store compare of the nook and prs-505.

    69. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by wannabe-retiree · · Score: 1

      What kind of travel do you do? While I've never used a kindle, I assume that it falls into the category of electronic devices that must be turned off prior to taking off and then before landing. I travel regularly for work and like to read on the plane. The time when flight door closes until we're in the air combined with the the approach to land is a minimum of 30 minutes. At worst, it can be over an hour where I wouldn't be able to read and that's not an option.

    70. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I don't know E-Ink that well beyond what I used to read of the initial form (OLED), but what I'm thinking is something along the lines of twitter apps or other messaging stuff. Not games. Or are you saying refresh will be too slow for those purposes too?

    71. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Ummm sorry to burst your bubble but e-ink IS THE REASON that people use this and why tablets will never compete with them...ever. E-Ink saves your eyes, requires practically no power, and allows for a much thinner display.

      There are many many many people out there who want the single use device and these will be here for decades to come. If you dont understand then consider this, why would people use an ipod or phone when they could use a laptop for about the same price? Laptops have been around for a long time and they dont seem to be detering PDAs and phones at all...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    72. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Again it's a device which will soon find itself pushed into a niche by more versatile products.

      With battery lives of about 5 minutes...really useful...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    73. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Knara · · Score: 1

      Yeah but except for the "slate" designs, tablets are just too large, too hot, and too much of a pain in the ass to really be a viable option right now (and the slate PC designs are often either underpowered, over priced, or both)

    74. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A messy room filled with towering stacks of cardboard boxes labeled "books" just screams "eccentric genius".

      Or "serial killer".

    75. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Many of your durability and other complaints stem from a conflation of book and reader. In an e-reader situation, your books are merely data. In theory, they're infinitely durable, never run out of power, can't be damaged, etc. (DRM makes that less true.) The durability, battery, and other complaints are not about the book but the READER.

      For a physical book, your "book" is the text, and your "reader" is a stack of paper. The book is not DRM'ed, but is locked to a single reader. You must buy a new reader for every book, and while they are durable and long-lasting, they take up a lot of space and mass.

      Most of your concerns about e-books relate to the artificial scarcity and lack of durability built into them by the current crop of books. These concerns could be met if books used an open standard: in 30 years, someone could write code to read/display the latex or xml code that a document was written in, and display it however you wanted (assuming one took care to make sure the bits were stored on media that was readable). Let me try and give counterpoints to some of your concerns:

      Battery: I agree, longer battery life would be nicer. Recharges via solar or other power would be nifty. However, the several-day lifespan of an e-book reader is generally more than the time it takes me to read a book, and I have many opportunities to recharge. My phone gets less battery life.

      Space: Sure, it fits in your pocket. How about two books? Three? Several novels, a newspaper, a reference book, and Wikipedia? (I exaggerate with Wikipedia, but I suspect not for long.) E-books scale VERY well, whereas physical books do not. I have five bookshelves full of books, and some are stacked two-deep. This makes finding a particular book (or determining if I have one) a potentially challenging process. An electronic library is searchable, and there's no need to worry about where they are. I can also download a large archive of books from Project Gutenberg and have a library full of classic works which would be either hard to find or impractical to store on my own.

      Durability: The reader is un-durable, compared to a paper reader. However, the data on the reader is, presumably, easily duplicated. In the case of a fire or other catastrophic accident (hurricane, etc), your e-book collection can be (in theory) much more easily replaced. The best-case scenario (broken reader) is much worse, but the worst-case scenario can be far better. (Again, DRM makes this harder to do, but if most of your books are free, unencumbered, or cracked, it's very viable.)

      Obsolescence: Project Gutenberg (and equivalents) make me feel that many books will not be obsolete. The obsolecense is a product of the DRM on the books being sold, not a fault of the reader. Open formats (Mobipocket? PDF? XML? Latex? Plain text?) are things which anyone can implement, whether this year or in a century, in order to be readable on Their Favorite Platform (whether than be Kindle, Nook, Apple Tablet, Google REading Platform, the GutenBook, your PC, or a voice synthesizer in your ipod).

      DRM: Burn, burn in hell. I wish there were none ... but if the books were cheap ($1? $3?) and still transferrable between people (and back-up-able), I'd hate it less. Fortunately, Project Gutenberg and the Baen free library make me believe that quality free content is still available. I'd even pay for an unencumbered e-book, even if the same could be found on TPB, if I felt it were a good book at the right price.

      Disaster: In case of fire, flood, tornado, or alien invasion, you can take the memory chip you've socked away in your safe (or offsite) and re-load your e-library into your e-book, enabling you to carry survival guides, maps, the Boy Scout Handbook, your comics, and your entire collection of Star Wars novels with you as you book it to safety in the woods.

      I'm looking forward to having e-books that are annotateable by hand (drawings, mustaches on pictures, scribbled notes for pages, etc). I suspect some readers already let you, and I either don't know of (or can't afford) them. :D I would absolutely LOVE the ability to buy (or download) the entire archives of some of my favourite (or prospective new) webcomics, also.

    76. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      And it's had Linux, which is why I don't think all the Android optimism is much warranted.

    77. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using a black background with white text. This makes reading on the iphone much less strenous. I have read about 5 books this way, and haven't had any eye strain problems.

    78. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      you need Amazon involved to get PDFs on a Kindle

      No you don't; you can use USB.

    79. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by ender- · · Score: 1

      - Obsolesence; this is why I really replied. You have got to be kidding. The majority of books go obsolete, and the classics are usually kept and handed down. Why would that change. My copy of 1984 will go to my kids (and so will the non-drm'ed pdf). Why will a file format become dead? I don't understand the idea that in 5 to 50 years, suddenly computers will refuse to open pdf files.

      Sure PDF's will be around. But I don't think the ebooks that Amazon and B&N sell are PDFs. I don't know what format they are, but I'm pretty sure they are encumbered by DRM. As long as that is the case, I won't pay money for them. Much like Microsoft/Yahoo Music decided to shut down their DRM servers, I have no trust that Amazon/BN will still be supporting this particular file format/DRM method beyond a couple years.

      Admittedly I'm not too familiar with the specific file formats that Amazon and BN sell. Are they proprietary? Am I going to be able to buy an e-book reader in 20-50 years that supports that format? Which format is going to be still around? I don't want to buy a Kindle and then have the Nook format be the one that sticks and is available/supported in the future.

      As I said, I still want a e-book reader but they're still a bit expensive for me, and I would only end up using it for free, unencumbered files. When there is an open standard for ebooks I might consider spending money on some.

    80. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Marauder2 · · Score: 1

      The Kindle DX will natively display PDF's. I have one and LOVE it. it has ~3.5G of storage space, but sadly no expansion capability. Amazon's eBooks are in the MobiPocket format with a derivative of it's DRM. There are tools that will strip the DRM from Mobipocket files, both Amazon and non-Amazon, and software that will convert between formats including PDF, eBook, MobiPocket, etc. such as Calibre.

    81. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Sony Reader (PRS-505?) and I have to say that I'm perfectly satisfied with it - wouldn't go back to buying paper books, wouldn't need to upgrade.

      -Battery - rated in pageturns, not time, so even reading a few hours a day as I do, it usually lasts two to three weeks.

      -Space - it's longer and wider than a paperback, but much thinner. in any case, much better than any hardback.

      -Durability - well, I haven't dropped all that many times, but the cover stays closed with magents to protect the screen, and with no moving parts it's pretty sturdy.

      -Obsolescence - I convert all my bought books and no-so-bought books either to RTF or PDF - both of which are not going anywhere.

      -DRM - what DRM? I get rid of all the DRM.

      -Physicality - well, the important consideration is that it *looks* like paper more than any other screen I've ever seen, and I can read all day without getting any eye strain.

      -Disaster - Sony Reader probably slightly easier to kill someone with, when the end times come and we have to subsist on human flesh.

    82. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they're next to the boxes labeled "toenail clippings".

    83. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      Yeah but except for the "slate" designs, tablets are just too large, too hot, and too much of a pain in the ass to really be a viable option right now (and the slate PC designs are often either underpowered, over priced, or both)

      Anything that's not a slate is not a tablet to my mind - stuff with a keyboard and some sort of rotating screen forgoes all the advantages of a tablet without giving you anything extra over a normal laptop. Apple would never produce a tablet which has a keyboard attached - it's just too ugly and bulky. So when I say tablet, I mean what you might think of as a slate in PC terms.

      I imagine they'll go with ARM to solve the power/heat/cost issues seen in PC tablets; that will let them produce something pretty thin and light, but with sufficient power for media viewing. It is after all a device for viewing, not really for creating content - so huge CPU power is not required. It would not run desktop apps (which leads to disasters from both a UI and a power point of view). You don't need lots of power for a book/media reader - the chip in the iphone would be fine for example, running a mobile OS. Keyboard would be a software one as with the iPhone or nook - perfectly good for light use. Possibly they could use OLED for better power consumption, but that might be too expensive right now.

      All the pieces are in place, the OS is ready, the chips are ready, battery tech has made some advances, and I think now is the time for an LCD reader to really make a splash - it would feel like a huge step up from the chunky, low-res, low-refresh rate, monochrome ones we currently see, and added functionality like watching videos or browsing the web in mobile safari would certainly attract a lot of consumers, and make an attractive platform for publishers/advertisers/content producers.

      This nook model is a step in the right direction, but really does make you wonder what it'd be like if the entire thing was a colour touchscreen rather than just a thin layer at the bottom.

    84. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      - Battery - Common complaint, my books don't run out of battery

      My Sony Reader PRS-505 (from 2 years) ago lasts 2-4 weeks on a single charge.

      - Space - I can fit a paperback in my pocket.

      The Sony Readers are really thin and come in 2 or 3 form factors now. Plus with the e-reader, I can tuck multiple books into my laptop bag instead of maybe one. They're also easier to read one-handed when I have a cat in my lap.

      - DRM

      Buy from vendors that don't use DRM.

      - Physicality

      Physical books suck, especially fiction/leisure reading. I'm too much of a packrat (I moved about 2500lbs of books in my last move). With e-books, I can cut down on that, yet still stimulate my mind with reading.

      - Obsolesence

      Once a book is in a widely understood digital format, I have no worries that I'll be able to read it in 25-50 years. Someone will make a format converter. However, to hedge my bets, when I buy books at Baen, I download it in multiple formats.

      The only big disadvantage of e-readers is price. I was happy when the readers first dropped below $300. I also took full advantage of Project Gutenberg and Baen's website to get inexpensive or free books. But if you find the reader cost + book cost to be too expensive... then you're not (yet) the target market.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    85. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Although to be fair, some slates come with small detachable keyboards that can be left in placed and pivoted around like on the laptop/tablet hybrids, giving you the choice of having an omnipresent keyboard at a cost of a little additional thickness, or not at your choice, by leaving the keyboard behind. I like that system. I image I would normally leave the keyboard attached, but I still see it as fundamentally different than the swivel screen "tablets".

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    86. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by webagogue · · Score: 1

      I've read 200+ page books on my Nokia N73! I've done similar on my iPhone with absolutely no eyestrain. I know I'm obviously in the minority here, so what is it that causes most people to have such eyestrain? Why am I not bothered by these screens?

      --

      Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
    87. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by JSlope · · Score: 1

      Do you read a lot of Russian books, or there are sources of English books in fb2 format?

      --
      ResoMail - the alternative secure e-mail system
    88. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You're going to play the anti-elitism card for . . . owning shelves for your books? Yeah, and I bet little Lord Fauntleroy there buy ACTUAL BARS OF SOAP from the store, instead of just using the the dispenser in a public restroom like the common man.

      Seriously, man. Seriously.

    89. Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books by eufreka · · Score: 1

      My cardboard boxes are free. Of course, they can't be used to show off how intellectual I am.

      Oh, you're not living in them, then...

  2. The OS would only matter if the device is open by iamacat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can users install their own apps or replace the OS? If not, I don't see how use of Android OS would matter.

    1. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by alen · · Score: 1

      buy a netbook and install linux

      this is an ebook reader, what is the point of installing another version of linux and other apps when netbooks have more features for the same price

    2. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by iamacat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can get a netbook with an e-paper screen that makes battery last for two weeks? Sweet!

    3. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      buy a netbook and install linux

      this is an ebook reader, what is the point of installing another version of linux and other apps when netbooks have more features for the same price

      More features doesn't necessarily mean better features. In this case, the point is to have the option to add more desirable features on top of an already desirable feature set.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well wait till its been officially released and in the store before you ask for Linux on it. ;-)

      If history is any guide it might take a week and a half for someone to post a hack.

      But even in the absence of that, the fact that it is Android DOES matter, because Android is growing rapidly, its open source, and has a lot of support from a lot of companies and individuals (and its basically Linux under the skin).

      This means there is an upgrade path for the device. Its not a dead-end device, and OS upgrades will likely become available, both official (B&N), and unofficial.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by elnyka · · Score: 1

      Can users install their own apps or replace the OS? If not, I don't see how use of Android OS would matter.

      It would matter for the manufacturer if it helps it reduce software development costs, thus reducing time-to-market, manufacturing costs.

      This would matter to the company (and its sofware developers and hardware manufacturers and every other 3rd party company, down to individual developers involved in its manufacture) as it would improve its ability to be competitive, by increasing their ability to reduce pricing (a-la ZOMG! Sunday sale!!11).

      This would also matter to the end-user (the average of which cares more about reading content than being teh l33t hax0r (or p0s3r). It'd matter to him in that it increases her chances of getting a quality e-reader at a lower price (or get more features for the same price.)

      It would also matter for the Android OS community (and Linux at large) in that it would prove, once again, that it is possible to produce a hell of a product using FOSS.

      Not everything that matter to the open source community (or software innovation in general) revolves around "gee, can I play open source mommy-n-daddy with it and insert my e-weener up its USB port"? Amazing, I know!

    6. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by BStocknd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So sick of hearing the 'why buy an ebook reader when [some device] can do way more', and that device never has the e-ink display. The whole point of these readers is the display.

    7. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. Why do the iPhone and netbook people not get this. Every time an ebook story comes out I have to hear the same ill advice about how sitting in a hammock with an LCD screen that I can't read outside is a better alternative.

    8. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Again · · Score: 5, Funny

      [...] that I can't read outside is a better alternative.

      Outside? What is this place? Tell me more.

    9. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by adolf · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't matter.

      Most portable devices I have, these days, include various open-source software on them, ranging from libjpeg to the entire kitchen sink.

      But that doesn't mean there's an upgrade path. And even the ones that go so far as to run Linux or BSD kernels, or have Android or Debian as their OS: They don't have a clear upgrade path, either.

      Because, see: In all cases, the core functionality of these devices (pick just about any of them) is either a giant binary blob, or a collection of many smaller binary blobs. That the blob(s) might link to libjpeg, or run under the Linux kernel, does not inherently somehow give it any sort of meaningful upgrade path from what is already there.

      ("Upgrade," in this context, is meant to mean something that improves a device's functionality, and most distinctly not something which is installed simply because it is possible to do so.)

    10. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I obviously haven't used this device yet, but the e-ink screens I've seen so far have refresh rates far, far too low to be suitable for general applications. It's getting better, but is still only suitable for certain applications.

    11. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by NiteShaed · · Score: 2, Informative

      um, why can't you sit outside and read an ebook on your iPhone while sitting in a hammock? I do it all the time, and it seems to work just fine for me....

      You personally may not like it, or perhaps you have some specific vision problem that stops you from doing it, but that doesn't mean it's not a perfectly good suggestion for a great many people anyway.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    12. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would be more interested in having one that was in color than having one with a fast display. Give me WiFi and a color e-ink screen, and I will buy a dozen to hang on my walls. The current digital picture frames are a nich market right now because most people don't want to have wires running from every picture to keep the display running. They also have to fiddle too much to get new pictures on them.

    13. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Shagg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're asking Slashdot what is the point of getting on a device and tweaking/adding your own code? Seriously?

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    14. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      It would be incredible to unlock the device and have a browser running on an e-ink screen with wifi and unlimited 3G service.

      The e-ink and unlimited 3G service would appear to be key advantages over netbooks if possible.

    15. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Not only can LCDs (often) not be read in sunlight, but they use more power, and (IANA expert, but supposedly) it causes more eyestrain to look at a backlit screen than an electronic paper display.

      What's more, even a netbook is going to be bigger, bulkier, and heavier than the nook or kindle, so you have to consider how you want to use the device and which form-factor makes more sense. Plus, these e-book devices have built-in cellphone data plans and supported ebook stores, which might make it easier and more convenient to get the content you want.

      I'm not trying to sell anyone on these e-books, and I'm not going to buy one myself. However, it's silly to think that these don't have advantages over netbooks.

    16. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all cases, the core functionality of these devices (pick just about any of them) is either a giant binary blob, or a collection of many smaller binary blobs.

      OK, I'll pick Android.

      There are a couple of "binary blobs" (Market, the Google apps, and a browser plugin). Everything else is F/OSS. (That is, the browser, UI, etc.)

      So.. what was it you were saying?

    17. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Outside? What is this place? Tell me more.

      It's like this really big room, with a bright blue ceiling. It's on the other side of this door that is usually locked...

    18. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by AmishElvis · · Score: 1

      If you spend too much time reading your iPhone, your batteries will die. Then you will have no phone, and maybe get eaten by bears.

    19. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      I've heard they have women there!

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    20. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      It would be incredible to unlock the device and have a browser running on an e-ink screen with wifi and unlimited 3G service.

      The e-ink and unlimited 3G service would appear to be key advantages over netbooks if possible.

      How much a month for the 3G service to get 'unlimited'?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    21. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      Well...that would be the advantage of hacking this thing to add unwanted functionality. You don't pay any monthly fee, since all of the 3G service cost is already built into the cost of the device. Just the cost of a year's service would be more than the cost of this device.

      Presumably, B&N would not be thrilled with you if you did this though.

    22. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by tftp · · Score: 1

      I am unsure how B&N can release a device that will be quickly reprogrammed to act as a free 3G modem. That alone probably guarantees that Nook's functions are securely locked and there is no obvious way (without some major surgery) to access the bootloader and reflash the device.

      From experience with other devices it can be said that to do an open source Nook software you need to dump the B&N one and write your own, from scratch. Most likely the 3G access keys will be lost (and you can't just pull them out of the original firmware, legally.)

    23. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Not only can LCDs (often) not be read in sunlight

      This is a trade-off. You can't read e-ink in the dark--ever.

      it causes more eyestrain to look at a backlit screen than an electronic paper display.

      This is somewhat contested. I've heard eye-doctors make the claim that LCDs don't hurt, and I've seen them claim that they do. My suspicion is that it depends on the person. I stare at LCDs for probably 13 hours per day, and I don't experience eye-strain.

      What's more, even a netbook is going to be bigger, bulkier, and heavier than the nook or kindle, so you have to consider how you want to use the device and which form-factor makes more sense. Plus, these e-book devices have built-in cellphone data plans and supported ebook stores, which might make it easier and more convenient to get the content you want.

      This is the biggest issue, I think. You can get pretty light and small netbooks, but it's nothing compared to the e-readers on the market these days. The cellular plans really take the taco, though. I can't imagine the convenience of hearing about a book on the radio or a friend talking about it, and being able to just grab my reader and buy it right there. This is also a disadvantage, of course!

    24. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Eil · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope so. If this reader can also do podcasts, play MP3s, and has a usable web browser (even if only over wifi), I'll be selling trading in my Nokia N800 for one of these.

    25. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by icebike · · Score: 1

      So.. what was it you were saying?

      He was saying he doesn't understand Android, and can't differentiate between an Open Source OS and an proprietary application.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    26. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If LCDs aren't backlit, you can't read them in the dark either.

    27. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1
      Let's see specific uses:
      • New E-Book formats
      • Hook up with Amazon store (B&N will love it)
      • Play sideways tetris on the little screen
      • Ubuntu on E-Ink
      • pron
    28. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by PitViper401 · · Score: 1

      I thought those were just a myth!

    29. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      For most slashdotters, it's also upstairs.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    30. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by adolf · · Score: 1

      Right. Thank you for clearing that up for me. I'm afraid I was terribly confused. I guess you're right: Obviously, it's the OPEN SOURCE OPERATING SYSTEM which operates the E-book functionality of this device -- the application has nothing to do with that at all.

      Oh, wait. That's not it. I mustn't have been confused at all.

      Dammit, kid: Just because it can (or does) run Linux, doesn't mean that there's an upgrade path inherent in that trait.

      So what if it can run anything? Suppose you do replace the core function of it? Great -- you've genericized the device! Hooray for you. Woo. Fire up an sshd and get hacking! See if you can get X to run on the thing. Or mame! Yeah. Sure. Whatever.

      Haven't we grown past this once we started hacking the WRT54G? I mean: I must admit that my iPod touch is jailbroken and does have a command prompt on it. Was that an upgrade? FFS, I've never done anything useful with that function, so I'd guess that no, it wasn't an upgrade.

      Just because "ZOMG! I can run appz on teh e-book reader!!!!1!" doesn't mean that a better ebook reader application will just appear, by itself, from the ether. And for such an application specific device as this, all that ancillary third-party stuff is generally pretty pointless.

      It's a nice option to have, for sure. But the point is (and it's the only point I was really trying to make) that just because it's open-source, doesn't mean anyone's going to bother doing anything better than the binary blob already does. They might bother, of course -- and in many instances (principally, the WRT54G) they have. But it's not a given.

    31. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by jshackney · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...you are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

      Don't go outside.

    32. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside? What is this place? Tell me more.

      It's like this really big room, with a bright blue ceiling. It's on the other side of this door that is usually locked...

      And the graphics are pretty damn amazing.

    33. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Every time an ebook story comes out I have to hear the same ill advice about how sitting in a hammock with an LCD screen that I can't read outside is a better alternative.

      You're right, it's worse in every way except one: my phone fits in my pocket and is always with me, so it's available whenever I have a few minutes to kill. Despite the e-books' better display quality, it's just not worth carrying around a separate eBook reader all the time.

      Hmm, perhaps what the world really needs is a cell phone with an eInk screen.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    34. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Not only can LCDs (often) not be read in sunlight

      This is a trade-off. You can't read e-ink in the dark--ever.

      ? Just use whatever you use for paper books. A headlamp works well.

    35. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Then it's no longer dark.

    36. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      Around here it is more like a big room wit a gray ceiling and a malfunctioning sprinkler system right now :-(

    37. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      And, more importantly, if B&N decides to do an Amazon, it'll take under a week before someone drops a patch on the net. that allows you to read all your books again.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    38. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      It also goes dark at night. There might be a hungry grue.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    39. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand. You mean my parents bedroom. You should have just said so to begin with.

    40. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Spot on, the whole point is the display. A solution in search of a problem, and now being touted as being equivalent to paper but more tightly controlled by the man. Why should I rush out and buy something with less functionality than a mobile phone just for 1 overrated and restrictive display technology ? Sure you can bang on about the battery all day if you like, but my phone gets put on charge every night anyway, so why is power consumption a big deal ?

    41. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      And the fact that the 3G service is built into the price should give any body with half a brain pause for thought. How long will they honour this ? If it costs the provider money and not enough people buy the books (which is where they would surely get their profit) will they not simply cease the service ? And since the 3G service is probably set up to only connect to the BN servers for the single purpose of buying books, what would be the point ? By hacking it to allow access to other servers, you remove the profit incentive of the provider, and kill the whole project.

      Proprietary shit. If you can choose your own provider and pay less for the device I could see a future, but tied up like it is - no way, Jose.

    42. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by BStocknd · · Score: 1

      If someone doesn't mind reading on a backlit-LCD, then there would be no reason to buy an e-book reader. They are basically a single-purpose device. But anyone that reads a good amount won't want to spend time reading a whole book on something like that. That's the point of the e-ink is that it's better on your eyes, and yes the battery life too, though that's just a side-effect of the way it works. These aren't meant to be multipurpose devices, they're meant to read books. If you're looking for a multipurpose device, go ahead and get a tablet/slate/phone, but I sure wouldn't want to read a book on any of those.

    43. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside? What is this place? Tell me more.

      It's like this really big room, with a bright blue ceiling. It's on the other side of this door that is usually locked...

      from the outside?!?

    44. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      You have too much goddamn disposable income.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    45. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Yes. Why do the iPhone and netbook people not get this. Every time an ebook story comes out I have to hear the same ill advice about how sitting in a hammock with an LCD screen that I can't read outside is a better alternative.

      Several reasons.

      A) They do not read anything other than textbooks, manuals and graphic novels. So the idea of sequentially reading a book with no pictures is an alien concept.
      B) They have never actually used an e-ink screen for more than a few pages at best. So go on the usual "After trying it in some shop for a few minutes, I didn't like it" excuse.
      C) They are personally offended that a device is not aimed at them, and are trying desperately to convince everyone that they don't actually want one anyway...
      D) It isn't made by Apple.
      E) It isn't their device, and as everybody knows, there can be only one.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    46. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by UnxMully · · Score: 1

      I thought those were just a myth!

      You inthenthitive clod! How dare you take the pith out of my lithp!

    47. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by gknoy · · Score: 1

      There is a cell phone with an e-ink screen: http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/03/29/review_motorola_motofone_f3/

      You can get one on Ebay for about $25, and probably another $25 in battery/charger/etc costs. It has very few features.

      A more powerful/featureful e-ink phone could be pretty cool, I agree. I don't think the form factor is enough for me to want to use it for reading, though.

    48. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Painted · · Score: 1

      Well, I work in the industry, and having looked at most of the alternatives out there, I'd say that the times an ePaper screen beats an LCD are remarkably few. Direct sunlight on the device being about the only one that I've encountered. I think that for some reason the E-Ink displays have a reputation that exceeds their reality- they're actually not that nice to read in many lighting conditions (average office to average living room lighting, for example). It's the lack of contrast that bugs me, the dark grey on light grey is just as aggravating as the LCD while in the hammock (do you get your hammocks from Mary's Hammocks, down in the hammock district?). However, I expect the number of times I'd use an ebook reader in mid- to dim lighting would far, far exceed using one in direct sunlight.

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    49. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      I don't think AT&T would have a problem supplying prepaid unlimited 3G service that nobody uses. Not a bit. Barnes & Nobel, on the other tentacle...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    50. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      My description is a big room, with a blue or or gray ceiling; malfunctioning lighting, sprinklers, and climate control; and severe problems with the air not remaining stationary at times.

      It is completely unsuitable for most endeavors.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    51. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Miltazar · · Score: 1

      Outside? What is this place? Tell me more.

      It's like this really big room, with a bright blue ceiling. It's on the other side of this door that is usually locked...

      So you're saying its inside my wife's room? Huh...

      --
      "Hold! What you are doing to us is wrong! Why do you do this thing?"
    52. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      I obviously haven't used this device yet, but the e-ink screens I've seen so far have refresh rates far, far too low to be suitable for general applications.

      I recently bought the Sony PRS-600BC. It updates the screen to full quality in about half a second, and it has a "fast" update mode of about 6 Hz (I guess) with lesser quality. The fast mode is more than good enough for scrolling around large images (ER diagrams in my case), and when you get where you want the display will re-render highest quality. It uses the fast mode for the on-screen keyboard feedback as well, and it feels quite responsive. Unfortunately it has no web browsing capability, but the display itself wouldn't hinder that significantly.

      The device itself is great, I've read about fifteen books on it so far, and I can recommend it strongly (even if it comes from the evil Sony). The contrast isn't as good as for instance the Irex Iliad, which I've also used a lot. This is due to the touch screen, but it's still more than good enough for hours and hours of reading without eye fatigue.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    53. Re:The OS would only matter if the device is open by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      it's just not worth carrying around a separate eBook reader all the time.

      I read a lot, and I used to carry around a paper book all the time, two when I was getting close to the end of the previous one. I recently bought a Sony PRS-600. It fits in the inner pocket of my jacket, and it's far more handy than a paper book. I literally never leave home without it.

      I've also tried reading books on my phone (Nokia N95 8GB), but the screen is too small for reading comfort in the long run, and the display quality is vastly inferior. I ended up choosing green on black to avoid eye strain, same as my terminal colours of choice. Even an iPhone can't touch E-Ink for reading novels.

      Hmm, perhaps what the world really needs is a cell phone with an eInk screen.

      I've thought about that as well, and apparently one exists, even if it obviously isn't intended for reading. It looks more like it's geared toward people with vision problems or technophobia. I don't think a "reader phone" would have a big market, people just aren't that interested in reading books. It also needs to be bigger than most phones to work well for novels. That said, I'd probably buy one if they built it :)

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  3. A little early by cjfs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Kindle Killer Arrives

    How do you kill that which has no life?

    1. Re:A little early by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The same way the iPod killed the MPman, Rio, and other early-to-market MP3 players.

      Now the iPod is like Kleenex or Hoover - the generic name for all players. Maybe the new Nook will become similarly popular and kill-off Kindle? I actually had one of my coworkers tell me that iPod is the only "true" player and I should stop using "ipod knockoffs" like Insignia. My attempt to tell him that iPod was not the first player, and actually arrived 3 years after the first was met with skepticism ("Don't be stupid. Apple was first.")

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:A little early by Umuri · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      Chainsaws and stakes work well

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    3. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      [Shrug] It's no more stupid than those people who think there was more than one Matrix movie.

    4. Re:A little early by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's nothing wrong with Matrix 2 and 3, except that they should have been merged as one single movie and shortened to three hours. I suspect the decision to divide them in half was a marketing decision (per usual) and ruined what could have been a good story. Damn greedy marketers. They are the same ones ruining music via the Loudness War.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:A little early by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer to shoot them in the head.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:A little early by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I actually had one of my coworkers tell me that iPod is the only "true" player and I should stop using "ipod knockoffs" like Insignia.

      I guess it's completely coincidental that since the ipod almost all mp3 players (including Insignia's) arrange their buttons in a "wheel" configuration and have form factors nearly identical to ipods huh ? Knockoff might be a little strong, let's say there are a lot of players which are an "homage" to the market leader ;-)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    7. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RDF - Reality Distortion Field

      Apple is always first
      Steve Jobs is always right
      Apples just work (and dont explode in your lap)

    8. Re:A little early by irondonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not me, with the price of silver bullets skyrocketing these days.

    9. Re:A little early by tmosley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy, just say these words:

      Klaatu barata ni...*mumble*

      Well, close enough, anyways.

    10. Re:A little early by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The Kindle Killer Arrives

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      Somewhere a Sony exec is grinding his teeth...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:A little early by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

      Apple wasn't the first to use a "wheel"... See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_PMP300 (Dunno if it was the first, but it was def before Apple)

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    12. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      Shoot it in the head.

    13. Re:A little early by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      The usual: Wooden stake, cold steel, silver chaingun ammo, The Sun, a blast furnace, that garlic bread I made back in grad school, and so forth, depending on just which kind of "no life" we're talking 'bout here.

    14. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killing the Kindle is more like pushing an old lady down the stairs. She was going to die shortly anyways, but you just helped the process along.

    15. Re:A little early by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Paraphrasing Prairie Home Companion:

      "In Minnesota we've got mosquitoes the size of sparrows. They'll drain a pint of blood before you say "Ow!" Spraying them with bug spray just irritates them. You could probably kill it with a crucifix, depending how hard you hit it."

      Err...you mentioned undead...vampires...blood-sucking...mosquitoes. There's that segue.

      Kindle is popular enough -- students aren't happy because you can't write notes in the margins -- that would be an easy extra with a stylus (I know, I know...no one thinks the stylus has a place anymore, but if you're one of those notes-in-the-margin types, being able to write on the e-book would be useful).

    16. Re:A little early by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Apple wasn't the first to use a "wheel"... See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_PMP300 (Dunno if it was the first, but it was def before Apple)

      Good find, hadn't seen that one. Still most players look to me like their design departments haver capitulated, it would be nice to see more innovation in this market.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    17. Re:A little early by beanyk · · Score: 1

      Now the iPod is like Kleenex or Hoover - the generic name for all players.

      Not yet with people I talk to (in the Washington DC metro area). For them iPod is still very specifically an Apple device. I hear "MP3 player" much more often when people aren't actually talking about the Apple product.

      Only a very small sample, obviously.

    18. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since kindle is fire, the obvious killer would be water. However, both fire and water do a lot of damage to physical books.

      I wouldn't buy any device with such obvious Orwellian naming schemes such as Kindle and Android. I prefer to think that ignorance != strength.

    19. Re:A little early by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you forget the number one rule:

      There are always more of them then bullets on hand.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:A little early by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Does the circular pad actually do anything? I can't tell from that page. It looks to me like the buttons are arranged in a circle, but that the circle they're contained in doesn't do anything (e.g. scroll through lists or act like a jog wheel).

    21. Re:A little early by flynt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Three books? Wait a minute. Hold it. Nobody said anything about three books. Like... like what am I supposed to do? Take-Take one book... or all books... or... or what? Three books? Nobody said anything about three books...

    22. Re:A little early by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      There are always more of them then bullets on hand.

      He is not the only one who forgot a rule.

    23. Re:A little early by metrometro · · Score: 1

      If the Nook ebook does become synonymohappens, I look forward to a generation calling all portable book readers "nookiebooks".

    24. Re:A little early by M8e · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with Matrix 2 and 3, except that they should have been merged as one single movie and shortened to three hours. I suspect the decision to divide them in half was a marketing decision (per usual) and ruined what could have been a good story. Damn greedy marketers. They are the same ones ruining music via the Loudness War.

      What???

    25. Re:A little early by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does the circular pad actually do anything? I can't tell from that page. It looks to me like the buttons are arranged in a circle, but that the circle they're contained in doesn't do anything (e.g. scroll through lists or act like a jog wheel).

      I owned one of these. No the circle does nothing special. It's just four buttons.

      It was a good player, especially considering it was the second mp3 player to market. The only serious fault (that i found) was the battery door was mechanically secured to the main board alone by a solder joint. This joint would eventually break, and it wouldn't get power. Likely an easy fix, but i had a warranty, so they just replaced 'em. I later got a Nomad II as a replacement, which also had a circular button panel on the front.

      --
      :x
    26. Re:A little early by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      no shit. Sony dumped a pile into their eReader and went nowhere. B&N can learn from their errors.

      Sony just built a machine, but had no books to sell. The profit margin on a digital file is orders of magnitude greater than hardware. B&N, like amazon, has books to sell. If Sony bought Chapters or some similar dealie, then they'd have an angle. As it is, they're just peddling an expensive eReader with nowhere to go.

      That said, if I got the B&N Nook, I don't think I'd ever buy a book, as I have hundreds of unread pdf books sitting on my laptop waiting for a better home...

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    27. Re:A little early by noidentity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [Shrug] It's no more stupid than those people who think there was more than one Matrix movie.

      Agreed; there was The Matrix, and two other movies that sucked.

    28. Re:A little early by BlueF · · Score: 1

      It's no more stupid than those people who think there was more than one Matrix movie.

      Brilliant!

      If I used a signature line, this would be it.

    29. Re:A little early by BlueBat · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use daggers and swords with some silver inlay. It does the job and is reusable. My battleax with silver inlay works well too.

    30. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A live product and a deceased product contain the same number of particles, so I don't think it matters much.

    31. Re:A little early by icebike · · Score: 1

      The Kindle Killer Arrives

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      Gimmie your watch and hold my beer.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    32. Re:A little early by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with Matrix 2 and 3, except that they should have been merged as one single movie and shortened to three hours. Or kept separate and shortened to 90 minutes each. The story as told was too long.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    33. Re:A little early by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      What do you mean what? Reloaded/Revolutions are two halves of a single story, just like Star Trek TNG's "Best of Both Worlds" is two halves of a single story. That is no great mystery to comprehend.

      My point was that rather than divide the Reloaded/Revolutions story in two parts, they should have left it as a single movie (and shortened it). It would have played better as a 3-hour single movie than as a 4-hour two-parter.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    34. Re:A little early by glwtta · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with Matrix 2 and 3

      Sure, if you don't consider sucking to be "wrong".

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    35. Re:A little early by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Necktie?

    36. Re:A little early by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The fake scroll wheels (like all rocker switches) are a disaster. Why connect your "next track" button (right) to your "volume up" button (up) without a gap between? Horrible. Good players have physical buttons with some space between them so you can click one button without mashing the others, and tell by feel which button you are pressing without looking at the player.

    37. Re:A little early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - the first 'true' player was the Sony Walkman...

      Portable, earphones, standard battery powered. And some models let you record in the field.

      Everything else is just upgrades: like the UI and recording format (from cassette tape, to hard drive, to solid-state)

      Bow down to Lord Sony!!!!!

      (and Sony was making pocket-sized radios when lil' Stevie Jobs was still making illegal blue-boxes with Woz!)

    38. Re:A little early by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Good find, hadn't seen that one. Still most players look to me like their design departments haver capitulated, it would be nice to see more innovation in this market.

      Well, I, for one, love my iRiver clix.

      I've also tried wife's Nano, but I found the damn thing to be very inconvenient to deal with precisely because of the wheel...

    39. Re:A little early by gknoy · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with Matrix 2 and 3, except that they should have been merged as one single movie and shortened to three hours.

      ... and released directly to DVD in a very quiet manner, so that we might have avoided noticing it. :D

    40. Re:A little early by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Nuke it from orbit..

      It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    41. Re:A little early by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      The eReader software allows you to highlight text and add notes. You can access those notes directly via an index, or if you see highlighted text, just click it and the note appears. Can't the kindle do that ?

    42. Re:A little early by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

      For pure music players, the simplicity and durability of the iPod design is going to be hard to beat (I didn't say impossible).

      But for generic music players, IMHO there are a LOT of other offerings that are far better than the iPod series. Take the http://www.archos.com/ PMP. (I have a 5, and with the extended battery I can get just about 24 hours of video on a single charge... It lasted on a trip from NYC to Australia and back on a single charge. Oh, and 250 gb of music/video)...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    43. Re:A little early by teshuvah · · Score: 1

      Obligatory: http://xkcd.com/566/

    44. Re:A little early by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      NPR out of American University might be pissing me off with their pledge drive right now, but nothing made me happier than when Prairie Home Companion now longer polluted the airwaves.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    45. Re:A little early by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Um, I had a 32MB Diamond RIO Player that came out long before the iPod (around 2 years) that had it's buttons arranged in a wheel-like pattern.

    46. Re:A little early by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Kindle does those things too. And makes your notes and annotations available via Amazon's web site if you log in.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    47. Re:A little early by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      But will it BLEND?

    48. Re:A little early by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Or that Starship Troopers was made into a movie at all.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    49. Re:A little early by PPH · · Score: 1

      How do you kill that which has no life?

      Following that line of logic, I must be immortal.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  4. Will it be DRM inside? by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    I know the G1 has some DRM issues, and that irritates me. Will this new e-reader also have them? If so, how pervasive and extensive will it be? It sounds like they intend to allow PDF reading. So maybe you can just avoid buying anything with DRM on it?

    1. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by drdanny_orig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Limiting your ability to "loan" books out to only 14 days sounds like DRM to me. As long as e-content has limitations not present in real books, there's no compelling reason for me to switch.

      --
      .nosig
    2. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      Limiting your ability to "loan" books out to only 14 days sounds like DRM to me. As long as e-content has limitations not present in real books, there's no compelling reason for me to switch.

      It would be nice if this had lending properties more similar to a traditional book, but at least this is a step in the right direction. I like the idea of giving no time limit, but only allowing one person to view the files at a time (I imagine this would be nearly impossible to implement though).

    3. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by MrTester · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you would rather have it behave exactly like a real book?
      As soon as you loan it to a friend, it will be wiped from your eBook reader?
      Really?

    4. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Z1NG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that doesn't sound unreasonable to me, as long as you can get the book back when your friend is done.

    5. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends - the nature of loaning would be that only one version works at a time. If they allowed loaning with renewal and it defaults to reclaiming it after 14 days (libraries are generally 3 weeks after all), that would not be bad - how many of us have loaned out books and forgotten who has it? If instead it allows both copies to work - you buying it allows you to grant someone else a 14 day trial, this is also not a bad offer. If you can't loan the same person the book twice, then I can see grounds for complaint. Not sure what the implementation will look like.

    6. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Well, you can read a book in 14 days. And since your brain has no DRM, so they can't clear it out even if they wanted to.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    7. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to sell it to someone else when you're done with it?

    8. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What DRM issues?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      At least they're not using the verb "squirt" to describe sharing content.

    10. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends. Libraries ahve a limited time you can borrow a book, is that DRM? what if you can extend it?

      What if books were 5 bucks? Books have problem not present in this eBook. Font adjustment, dictionary, thesaurus, then ability to just order the next one in a serious, etc.

      What if a book cast 12 bucks, BUT you can either sell it back for, say 4 bucks, or put it in some sort of auction for resale? would that be alright?

      they're different things, and I am just wondering if you have an actual concern or just don't like them because your not use to them,.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that? It actually sounds like a reasonable behavior for most digital goods... ebooks, music, games, etc.

    12. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Depends. Libraries ahve a limited time you can borrow a book, is that DRM? what if you can extend it?

      I have a Sony Reader, which supports lending library DRM. The standard library ebook checkout checkout duration is 14 days. At my library, I have an option to check out for only 7 days if I wish. If I finish early, I can "return" the book using desktop (PC/Mac) software. If I don't finish in 14 days, I can either check out the book again (but not if there's a waiting list), or simply turn back the clock on the reader to before the due date.

    13. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least they're not using the verb "squirt" to describe sharing content.

      Here, try this book *skeet* *skeet*

      --
      :x
    14. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      So you would rather have it behave exactly like a real book?
      As soon as you loan it to a friend, it will be wiped from your eBook reader?
      Really?

      Actually, I would prefer that style of DRM. Yeah, I'd rather have that. (It's not like you're never going to get it back, unless you have one of *those* friends.)

    15. Re:Will it be DRM inside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would rather have it behave exactly like a real book?
      As soon as you loan it to a friend, it will be wiped from your eBook reader?

      That's a physical limitation of real books. It's not a physical limitation of e-books. As long as a device that I own is imposing artificial limitations on my actions, at someone else's bidding, there's a problem.

  5. Why can't I just use my iPhone? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It provides a nice readable display, and more importantly doesn't make me open my wallet to buy a separate gadget.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by onefriedrice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who says you suddenly can't use your iPhone to read books now that B&N has their own reader which might appeal to other people?

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    2. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      How does the availability of dedicated ebook readers prevent you from using your iPhone? If it does it must be you, because Stanza has worked for me for more than a year and delivered several books without my opening my wallet.

      If I read ebooks anywhere other than on planes I might spring for something else, as the iPhone is a marginal substitute.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by hallucinogen · · Score: 0

      Is your iPhone's 'nice readable' display 6" in size? Does it last 10 days without a recharge? iPhone 3GS with JB makes a nice mp3 player and an okay phone. It's also a semi funtional internets wise. However as an e-book reader it fails miserably.

    4. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>the iPhone is a marginal substitute.

      One disadvantage is the power consumption. iPhone lasts about 8 hours and apparently these e-paper gadgets can last a week of daily reading. So maybe I was too quick to criticize.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      It provides a nice readable display, and more importantly doesn't make me open my wallet to buy a separate gadget.

      Meh. I've tried reading books on my iPhone and it's just too small to be a comfortable read. Plus the battery life sucks.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by icebike · · Score: 1

      For some values of "readable" this might be true.

      But I have the B&N reader, as well as Stanza and Kindle reader on the iPhone, and believe me it is a reading platform of last resort. Stuck on a train/plane/hotel-room; fine.

      Anywhere else, no thanks.

      Too small, too little info per page (no possible way to skim a book on that tiny screen) and a battery life of a new york minute.

      Yes, you CAN use your iPhone. There's an App for that, but jeeze, talk about a platform mismatch!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      It provides a nice readable display, and more importantly doesn't make me open my wallet to buy a separate gadget.

      An iPhone has weird bugs. For instance, when reading /. on an iPhone 3G like I am right now, it won't let me post except in reply to an existing user comment. This can be awkward if what I want to say is irrelevant to any other post. Which brings me to my second point....

      What good to a nook is a hook cook book?

    8. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a Kindle, and when I turn the wireless feature off, I've had a single charge last for 2 weeks of reading averaging 2+ hours a day, at a pretty regular rate. With eInk displays, it's the number of page turns that eats power - slower readers might have better results.

      A second reason is that the iPhone display, while nice, is still back-lit and still gives me headaches if I read off of it for extended periods of time. eInk looks more or less like paper and doesn't operate by shining a bright light in my face.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    9. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by day2day · · Score: 1

      I like to use both. The kindle and iPhone. I don't carry the kindle everywhere with me so the phone is handy when you have a little time to kill. When I turn the Kindle on it automatically syncs to the last page I read on the phone.

    10. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by jheiss · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other disadvantage is that the screen is really fucking small.

    12. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by BLKMGK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've used my iPhone and prefer my Kindle. Battery life, ease of reading and display size are all good reasons why I don't like reading on the iPhone. You might like it but for me it's like trying to watch p0rn through a keyhole - still entertaining but I'd much rather have a front seat!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    13. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Well you can, but you'd miss out on some -amazing- exclusive features of B&N nook that you're probably noticing on the comparison page and salivating over. Specifically:

      -Free Wi-Fi in all Barnes & Noble Stores
      -Exclusive content when in your local Barnes & Noble store
      -Try reader in store before buying
      -Replaceable colorful back cover

      I love it when marketers stuff absurd stuff in there. Really? I can't get "exclusive content" while I'm in a barnes and noble on my kindle? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

    14. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by dissy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't I just use my iPhone?

      Didn't read the manual? Fingers all thumbs? Is it turned on?

      Without further information, I will be unable to diagnose further why you are unable to use your iPhone.

      /joke :P

    15. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It provides a nice readable display

      Ha ha ha ha! Oh god, that's good... yeah, a tiny little backlit colour screen. That's *way* more readable than a page-sized e-ink display.

    16. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Unless you regularly go without charging that iPhone of yours for a week at a time, why would that matter? You're probably charging every night anyway, aren't you?

      I'd also bet that the iPhone lasts a lot longer than just 8 hours of reading eBooks... hell, my HTC Prophet does that, and it's ancient. Newer WinMo devices will double or triple that...

    17. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      These are indeed horrible points created by marketing.

      If things as superficial as color casing are important to you:

      http://www.buymedge.com/ http://www.oberondesign.com/store/kindle.php

      Wi-fi is nice, but honestly, most of the files that I download to the Kindle are so small that it's probably faster to download them over Sprint's cell network than it is to authenticate whatever Wifi network I'm trying to connect to.

      The "exclusive content" when in a store is just an attempt to actually to get you to walk into a store every once so maybe you'll buy a physical book in addition to your electronic one.

    18. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Knara · · Score: 1

      For some value of "readable" that means "it's no fun at all to read a long work", I suppose.

    19. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      What good to a nook is a hook cook book?

      I was just thinking the same thing.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    20. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Sure, when I'm not traveling generally the amount of time I can spend between charges isn't that big. Lately, though, I've been taking flights that last for more than 8 hours and end with me wanting to have juice to make phone-calls - this is huge. Also sometimes, even when I'm not traveling, I don't sleep at home, or might spend more time during a day using a device than I normally do, so having more room for not needing to recharge is definitely a plus.

      I've had my iPhone run out of juice on me at least 10 times in the last year, and in all 10 of those instances it was inconvenient. Longer battery life is more convenient, even if it isn't an issue all the time.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    21. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by weekendgeek · · Score: 1

      That's funny - I've read just under 10 novels on my iPhone using the free Kindle app.

      The best part about it: the phone's always with me. That means if I'm stuck waiting somewhere, I can get some reading in. Also, since it is does have a back-lit display, I can read in bed and not keep the wife up.

      I've almost bought a Kindle multiple times, but after thinking about it, everything I like about reading using the Kindle app on the iPhone, the Kindle itself doesn't have.

      --
      It would be presumptuous to conclude that Americans have no right to know what is being done in their name
    22. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is usable, and I'm more likely to have it on the road than the Kindle. But it's still better reading on the Kindle, and the battery life on the iPhone sux.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    23. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can. No one is stopping you. And those of us that either don't have iPhones or would rather read on a 6" e-ink display rather than a 4" LCD, or use something that will last a week between charges instead of only a few hours, can use this.

      Don't assume that you're the target audience. If you're perfectly happy reading on your iPhone, you probably aren't. Personally, I'm thinking about getting one. I've got a bunch of ebooks in PDF form, and this (or one of Sony's readers) would be great for reading them. The screen's much bigger than my phone's, and the battery life is way better than my netbook, which gets maybe 2 hours if I turn the brightness down to nearly unusable levels. The price is still higher than I'd like though. $200 is about my limit for a single-purpose device like an eBook reader.

    24. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Considering this device will use "AT&T's 3G Wireless Network" you might as well just use your iPhone. Of course, you can't "loan your books" to other iPhone users in the same manner.

    25. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I guess telling you to get a spare battery would be mean, huh? :p

    26. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Painted · · Score: 1

      This is true, but how often do you really need two weeks of battery life? I rarely (it does happen, but not often) am away from a charger for my iPhone, and I don't think I've ever run it below 40% charge. I just drop it in a dock when i get home, and nab it in the morning.

      But I do get your point, longer life better than shorter, I'm just wondering at what point does it stop being a major issue / feature / purchasing point- "your device only gets 7 weeks on a charge, mine gets 9!". For me, charging while I sleep works just fine, since I end up doing that pretty much every day anyway...

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    27. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      For me, I'd say "7 days of regular use without charging" would be the point beyond which it wouldn't matter unless it was literally "indefinitely, with regular use."

      With my Kindle, I've literally never been inconvenienced because it was at a low charge, despite using it for 2+ hours daily - it is a very forgiving device. Have I ever needed 2 weeks worth? No, not NEEDED. Have I used 2 weeks worth? You betcha.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    28. Re:Why can't I just use my iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      translated as "waargarble, im a moron and dont care what other people think, apple rules!1!1!, why would anyone think outside of the fruit?"

  6. Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by Radhruin · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... will have wireless capability from an unspecified carrier ...

    According to the comparison sheet, they're using AT&T.

    1. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, I won't be buying one then. Why does an ebook reader have to be tied to a phone carrier? Seems you should be able to buy a book from any phone and zap it to the reader with wifi or bluetooth.

      Well, after B&N's site finally loaded (almost slashdotted I guess), maybe it would be ok, since it does have wifi.

    2. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So why submit the post? It has wifi, how does having the ability to also use a cell phone network matter? I'm sure you could break it if it is that big a deal.

    3. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's what the iPhone is on, and there's a B&N ebook reader on the iPhone. (I haven't tried it yet, not being all that fond of buying ebooks, but overall I find the iPhone to be a decent reader if the software's good.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the Support Faq:

      Q: Will I be charged wireless fees? Do I need any sort of contract?
      A: No. There is no charge for your nook's wireless features. You do not need a contract.

      So free wifi AND 3G from ATT, apparently for life of the product.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by SaintNicster · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The "free wifi" bit is actually for anything, not just on the Nook. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/u/Wi-fi-at-Barnes-and-Noble/379001240/ Borders did the same thing as well. http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/borders-pulls-a-bandn-offers-free-wifi-to-all-patrons/

    6. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      AT&T sucks, I'll stick with my iPhone~

      Sometimes it's too easy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming I can hack in a browser then I'm sold before its even on sale. To the time machine!

    8. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So free wifi AND 3G from ATT"

      So, what can you do with the 3G? My understanding of it is that the kindle lets you read Wikipedia and the Amazon site (but not the web in general). What does this do?

      The native PDF support and SD card slot looks interesting. I have no interest in buying e-books, but I wouldn't mind something that I can put references and textbooks on - I want access to one or two pages when I need it, but I can't carry around a dozen reference books all the time.

    9. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Barns an Nobel lets you read Amazon site? How Open of them.

      But assuming and ignoring the typo, the fact that you can read any off-site content is more or less a freebee. The 3G is there to let you buy books, sync your reader platforms etc.

      But it does suggest a future ability to buy subscriptions, and have your morning paper at the breakfast table with out struggling to flip a page.

      The key thing here, is B&N as well as Kindle are willing to pick up the bandwidth for any content you buy, and they probably have the capability to allow future web surfing as well. Maybe as customer perks, maybe as a paid plan, or maybe they will just start pushing ads in my face. Point is, its possible to add this feature even if it does not have it now.

      These things will rescue the mainstream press. Mark my words.

      I know I wouldn't buy one of these things if I had to enter into a carrier contract.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, seriously. Can someone make one of these without the stupid 3G, just wifi? And knock $20-$50 bucks off the price for not including it?

      And putting it on the Nation's fastest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H least reliable Network is like kicking the buyer in the nuts. "Here, we have a really nice reader for you, but we're going to have to punish you for buying it."

    11. Re:Unspecified carrier? It's AT&T. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I also got confused for a moment, there. Apparently they use 'wireless' to mean 'mobile data'. Is this common over the pond ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  7. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some wireless. Less space than a kindle. Lame.

    1. Re:hmm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      At least it seems to have plastic back, not metal one... (seriously, what idiot manager at Amazon thought making the case of a book cold & fingerprint attracting was a good idea?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:hmm by jkauzlar · · Score: 1

      Not lame. You can put your own PDFs on it. This is why I don't buy a kindle.

    3. Re:hmm by thue · · Score: 5, Informative

      For the youngsters who don't get the reference, read the Slashdot blurb from the ipod's release: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/1816257&tid=107 . And then get off my lawn.

    4. Re:hmm by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      Wrong and wrong. It uses AT&T GSM and WiFi, where the Kindle uses Sprint CDMA only (on the $259 version). On space the Nook has 2GB internal storage (same as Kindle) but also has a micro SD slot that supports up to an additional 16GB.

    5. Re:hmm by geekoid · · Score: 1

      hay now, don't be handing out our past like that. Now a bunch of wannabes will pretend they have always been here.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the classical reference.

    7. Re:hmm by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      hay now, don't be handing out our past like that. Now a bunch of wannabes will pretend they have always been here.

      Hey, when did slashdot id's make it to six digits?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interesting thing is that he was right. But sometimes the marketplace doesn't pick what's "right".

    9. Re:hmm by starrsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow! That's scary! People will be looking back at our insane, all-knowing prognostications and laughing at what a bunch of idiots we are.

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    10. Re:hmm by starrsoft · · Score: 1

      The new ($279) international version uses AT&T 3G GSM domestically.

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    11. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting reading. That iPod sure sounds like crap. What happened to it?

  8. Wait for the fine print by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the website: "Most eBooks can be lent for up to 14 days at a time." So I'll wait to see the fine print before I jump for joy at another potentially crippled bit of electronics. I'll wait for a few months to see whether they've retained the power to delete user data or go about bricking the thing once someone "opens" it. If they reserve the 14 day to only titles under active copyright, then I'll be a bit more amenable to the gizmo (although eInk's refresh rate after a page turn still drives me up the wall). I simply don't trust any party related to the publishing and distribution industries to provide a device that simply meets my needs without resorting to underhanded tactics to impose their own agenda at a later date.

    --
    He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    1. Re:Wait for the fine print by icebike · · Score: 4, Funny

      While you LEND a book, you can't read it. The other party can read it (without paying for it). Then you get it back and you can read it but the other party can't.

      What could be Fairer than that? Its exactly like a paper book, except the other party can't fail to return your book.

      Jeeze, I wish I could get this plan for the tools I lend to my neighbor!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Wait for the fine print by sricetx · · Score: 1

      Any device that uses DRM to limit what the user can do after they have purchased it has already lost, in my opinion. The Amazon Kindle 1984 deletion debacle is a good example of why giving the manufacturer control of the content on the device is a very bad thing. I like to OWN the things that I buy, not license them. Why does Barnes and Noble have the right to decide that I can only loan MY book to someone else for 14 days?

    3. Re:Wait for the fine print by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      This is heavenly for me.
      I never keep a book after I have read it since I have learned that I never re-read it again (Unless it is a textbook of sorts). I read a lot of books though and can easily finish reading a book in 2 weeks. B&N is claiming that you can read a lend book on a PC with B&N software. All I need now is a few friends who'll lend me books. Alternately, I'll create a website where people can lend their books to each other if B&N does not create one.

      Google really seems to be pushing the world to a book-Utopia. All the books (and information you can find on the internet) you'd ever want, for free! Only thing you are limited to is by your reading speed and free time you have! The added bonus is the 500,000 books that Google has which it is giving away for free permanently.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    4. Re:Wait for the fine print by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Stupid Flanders!

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    5. Re:Wait for the fine print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you even read it properly?
      the 14 days lending is for sharing e-books you bought with others. I would love that feature.

    6. Re:Wait for the fine print by day2day · · Score: 1

      You already have it. When he has your tools you can't use them. When you have them he can't use them. Who knew you could apply DRM to a hammer...

    7. Re:Wait for the fine print by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly like a paper book, except that anyone who wants to borrow it needs to also have a $250 gadget (and it has to be a Nook, not just any other reader). Which makes that feature pretty useless, IMO, unless the software to read it on a PC or other device is freely available.

    8. Re:Wait for the fine print by zn0k · · Score: 2, Informative

      unless the software to read it on a PC or other device is freely available.

      Which it is.

    9. Re:Wait for the fine print by fermion · · Score: 1
      This is interesting, but the fine print and real capabilities is what is going to define the machine, not whiz bang features like a redundant screen and probably extremely limited lending ability.

      Here is what it will need to have. A read aloud feature similar to kindle. Even if it is limited, that will be a great help to a great many people. A full web browser. I assume that this will not be a big issue, but we are talking a real browser, with flash. The browser allows us to read newspaper without subscription. The ability to read PDF files downloaded from arbitrary sources. This is a big deal to be as I download many of my reading materials as PDF, and the ambiguous support on Kindle is the big reason why I never bought it.

      It would also be nice to able to mount external volumes through webdav of the like. Again, I can't imagine that Android does not have a filesystem capable of doing this.

      Which is to say i want a reader with a modern OS, so I can read from all the different sources I read on my laptop. Less and I am just buying a fancy way to read paperbacks, and paying a markup for the privilege. I think the nook does move us into a new realm of reading, but not neccesarily a bette one. If I have to pay ATT to use the network, then the Kindle is still a better value.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    10. Re:Wait for the fine print by icebike · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      You LEND to another Barns and Nobel account. They can read with what ever device they have, (iPhone, on line, etc).

      The Barns and Nobel reader for iPod/iPhone/Blackberry (and who knows what else) is freely available.

      Oh, wait, you wanted the device for free too?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:Wait for the fine print by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What could be Fairer than that? Its exactly like a paper book,

      What could be fairer than that? Perhaps using the natural advantages of the technology to do something books can't. Like allowing both of you to read the book at once. There's nothing fair about artificial scarcity.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Wait for the fine print by noidentity · · Score: 1

      While you LEND a book, you can't read it. The other party can read it (without paying for it). Then you get it back and you can read it but the other party can't.

      Maybe we can extend this improvement to all digital goods, so that for example when I have a Slashdot story on my screen, nobody else can see it until I close the window. Imagine all the things we'll be able to not do when we finally stamp out the evils of copying bits for free!

    13. Re:Wait for the fine print by icebike · · Score: 1

      There is nothing scarce about ebooks, or most books in print.

      Its not a scarcity issue.

      Its an "Authors find it hard to feed their families when forced to work for free" issue.

      Would you write a book if you knew you could sell exactly ONE copy which everyone in the world could share simultaneous?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Wait for the fine print by symbolic · · Score: 1

      No, but there's something completely fair about requiring you to give something in exchange for the value you receive. It has nothing to with scarcity...it has everything to do with value.

  9. Nooks by ojintoad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear B&N,

    Please partner with us.

    Sincerely,
    Thomas' English Muffins Inc.

    1. Re:Nooks by aicrules · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better come to the table with a business plan for the Crannies too, otherwise the merger execs will just laugh across the table at you.

    2. Re:Nooks by 600Burger · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Really?

    3. Re:Nooks by jpyeck · · Score: 1

      My thought when I saw the name is that it comes from Dr. Seuss - "One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish"...

      "On our way be saw a Nook. On his hat he had a hook. On his hook he had a book. On his book was "How to Cook". But a Nook can't read and a Nook can't cook, so what good to a Nook is a hook cook book?"

      Geek-with-young-kids

  10. Canada by Selfbain · · Score: 1

    We're going to get screwed over again aren't we? Can't kill the kindle up here because it's not around to begin with.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Canada by SilverJets · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. Even the "international" version of the Kindle is not available in Canada. WTF is up with that?

    2. Re:Canada by Pahroza · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's correct. It's not around, it's arectangle.

    3. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're going to get screwed over again aren't we?

      Can't be helped; that's what you get for being canadian.

    4. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boooo.

    5. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother to tailor a product to the 12 Canadians that actually know how to read? Most of 'em are more interested in moose head.

    6. Re:Canada by furbyhater · · Score: 1

      "Round" is an adjective. So itsarectangular would be more correcter ;-) (PS: Does the first letter of a phrase have to be capitalized if it's inside quotes?)

    7. Re:Canada by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Probably the national division of Amazon thought Canada was a foreign country, while the international division thought Canada was a state of the US, eh?

    8. Re:Canada by greeneggs2000 · · Score: 1

      Why bother to tailor a product to the 12 Canadians that actually know how to read? Most of 'em are more interested in moose head.

      Canadians actually read quite a lot. There is not much else to do when stuck inside for their eleven months of winter.

    9. Re:Canada by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blame Canadian content laws. Amazon is classified as a bookstore in Canada, and therefore must sell X percent Canadian content - a protectionist policy that supposedly protects us from evil Americans taking over our media. The net result is that Amazon could either stock and attempt to sell a boatload of Canadiana which sell poorly (and in Amazon's low-margin line of business, is death), or Amazon can choose not to operate in Canada at all. It has chosen the latter. Amazon.ca is operated entirely from within the USA (no employees or warehouses in Canada), and all shipping is contracted out to a 3rd party (which, being a shipper, is not subject to the content laws).

      Funny enough though, the shipper that handles all of Amazon.ca's work, the one that helps the company dodge Canadian law - is none other than Canada Post, owned and operated by our government. Some things just don't make sense.

    10. Re:Canada by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Blame Canadian content laws. Amazon is classified as a bookstore in Canada, and therefore must sell X percent Canadian content - a protectionist policy that supposedly protects us from evil Americans taking over our media.

      I think that it is Canadian ownership laws rather than content laws. I do not think that there are any laws stating that bookstores must sell a certain percentage of Canadian content. Knowing a number of workers and upper managers of Canadian bookstores, I have never heard any of them make any statements about Canadian content laws in relation to their businesses, and I can find no such references online to Can-con laws for bookstores.

  11. Where do the ebooks come from? by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 1

    The summary says nothing about where the ebooks come from, so does a book store allow the mere users to load any ebooks they like, or is it encumbered with DRM so mortals may only read the books B&S sells? I see it reads PDFs at least.

    Lending to friends(In TFA) sounds suspiciously like copying, which distributors are supposed to hate, so how does one "lend books to friends"? is there a limit to how long they read for, before the file is deleted? or perhaps you can only lend them the first few chapters?

    Looks spiffy, but I'm wary of the DRM it'll undoubtedly have. Will wait and see what others say about it first.

    1. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that as long as you're 'lending' the book to someone, you're not able to access it yourself.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    2. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At the company I work for we cannot take any orders from B&N over the phone since B&N contests every single bill. We need to have a hard copy of every B&N order for B&N to pay us. We often have to put B&N on hold for non-payment.

      What does this have to do with anything? Just putting it there that that is how B&N operates. They do their best to not pay for jack shit. If they are going to be distributing E-books I imagine they will screw publishers over even harder.

    3. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      After looking through some pages on it, it looks like it'll load ebooks in any format you want. The DRM will only apply to those books you buy that are protected. If you download a PDF or EPUB file from Project Gutenberg, it's all yours. The more I read about this Nook here, the more I want one. It's everything the Kindle should have been, but wasn't.

    4. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the first time I've heard this. My mother used to have to harass them to get paid at a small distributor.

    5. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by grayshirtninja · · Score: 1

      What, you mean like a real book? Shocking

    6. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      As with the Kindle, if you buy from a DRM-based store, then you'll have DRM'd material, and if you get it from somewhere without DRM, you can read those too without any problems. This does seem to allow PDF reading, but I wonder how they deal with the fact that its really hard to read a letter sized page on a screen that small with that DPI (the reason amazon decided to can that feature in the first place). This is just like how you could use the iPod pr any PlaysForSure compatible player with music ripped from any source, it was simply the various music stores that brought DRM into the picture.

      Certainly looks like a nice device, the idea of the touch-screen instead of the keyboard is particularly interesting. However, in the end, its going to be content thats critical -- they claim millions of titles, and if thats true, and if its things people want it will succeed. On the DRM front, the store is again critical -- the existence of 'lending' implies theres some form of content control (and I won't be surprised if Amazon tries to emulate it, if its not patent encumbered).

      Just remember, on all E-readers, you're not restricted to the store. If you have DRM-free content, you can use it. DRM only shows up in the equation when you consider the store, and this doesn't appear to do anything to change that. The fact that you can't easily rip a book like you could a CD makes it more of a pain though.

    7. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's correct. According to the Support FAQ on the Nook pages, books lent out cannot be read on your devices until the book is returned.

    8. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know Kindle well. You can easily convert epub to mobi for Kindle (using Calibre), and load the books on it for free via USB. The lending and the LCD at the bottom are new, as is the WiFi, but only the lending sounds like a real killer app.

    9. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Gotta love the apologists.

      "it can read it, you just gotta use this thing on another device to convert it then transfer it"

      By this logic, MS notepad can read PDF files. Just open a PDF in Acrobat, select the text, copy, paste into wordpad, then save as text.

      Um, seriously dude? That means it can't read it.

    10. Re:Where do the ebooks come from? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I never said it would read PDFs - it won't. It sucks at PDF, but that's not a negative to me because I don't read techical books on it, and I suspect that PDF will continue to be a pitiful afterthought until the devices are at least Kindle DX size.

      Could Kindle be a better device? Absolutely. Is Nook better? Yes. But this thread started with "can you read any ebook you want?", and for that the answer is a qualified yes. PDF will suck, but mobi format books that are available from non-Amazon, non-B&N, non-Sony retailers will easily read on it, and epub is convertible with the software you should probably be using to maintain your ebook library - Calibre. PitaBred was talking about loading non-bought books. I download direct to Kindle all the time from Gutenberg, for free.

  12. The real killer question: remote deletion? by noidentity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real killer question is whether it supports remote deletion like the Kindle does. The feature comparison doesn't mention this. Of course we'll only really know for sure if and when the feature is actually used; claims that it doesn't support it can't really be trusted (and the feature might be added in a later firmware update anyway).

    1. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP. This, and DRM, are The questions everyone ought to be asking about e-readers.

    2. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you're going for "informative" or whatever, but seriously - even Amazon acknowledged that they fucked up big time by remote-nuking 1984, and reversed it. While you'll never know for sure (unless someone is dumb enough to risk their business by doing that again) if this device or any other has that capability, I think it's reasonable to think that most businesses making such devices don't want to shit where they eat by doing a known bad thing.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    3. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by mystik · · Score: 1

      on the feature comparison site it's labeled as "Over-the-Air software updates"

      I don't really count that as a feature given Amazon's recent abuse of it.

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    4. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by Carik · · Score: 1

      That's one of the two things I'll be waiting for. That and the ability to load books from any random source, not just B&N.

      Those aside, the presence of 802.11 and the replaceable battery are what make it tempting.

    5. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      . . . I think it's reasonable to think that most businesses making such devices don't want to shit where they eat by doing a known bad thing.

      :s/think/hope/

      But that's no help for those of us who are paranoid.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    6. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And just look at the **AA. They are more than happy to antagonize their customers. Hell, Microsoft has made tens, if not hundreds of billions, of dollars while doing it.

      There are more than enough companies out there who are more than willing to do self-destructive things. It's only due diligence to investigate the means by which an interesting and potentially killer product could be ruined by some suit with a Napoleon complex.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You can put any books you want on Kindle; I'd have to assume you can do it on Nook.

    8. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I know you're going for "informative" or whatever, but seriously - even
      > Amazon acknowledged that they fucked up big time by remote-nuking 1984,
      > and reversed it.

      But the fact remains that they thought that the ability to do so was desireable and deliberately designed it in.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The real killer question is whether it supports remote deletion like the Kindle does.

      Does it matter? It's a remote-upgradable computing device. Even if it doesn't currently support that feature, they could always add it in the next automatic firmware update. Conversely, if it currently does have that feature, they could always remove it in a future update.

      What matters is whether you feel you can trust B&N not to screw you over.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      The **AA's customers are the record labels. The **AA's don't sell things directly to consumers. The record labels are not doing so hot these days, either.

      Microsoft is a monopoly. Monopolies, by definition, are able to be abusive and get away with it.

      Amazon? B&N? Not so much. I can get books from millions of places, ebooks from thousands of places. Sure, they *might* try to shoot themselves in the foot by doing something stupid like this, but I'm going to say it's unlikely.

      Also, on my Kindle, my copy of 1984 was never removed - I didn't get it from Amazon. It also doesn't have any DRM on it, nor do 99.99% of the books I have on it.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    11. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Sony eReader. No remote deletes, access to free Google eBooks, supports open format and if you choose, pay for eBooks from the Sony Store. It's lightweight, made from aluminum not plastic for more durability and the battery lasts a lot longer than on a kindle. The current version does not have WiFi or 3G but the next version coming out will have the Wifi support. I rather have the WiFi support in it then the 3G.

      I have one and love reading books on it.

    12. Re:The real killer question: remote deletion? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      What matters is whether you feel you can trust B&N not to screw you over.

      For starters.

      Me, I usually assume that eventually they will screw me over, and ask the follow question:

      When they screw me over and I vow to never buy from them again, is the device still useful?

  13. You can just use your iPhone? by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the comparison sheet, you can.

  14. why white? by GSpot · · Score: 1

    Why do all consumer electronic devices these days only come in -one- color, white. Thanks Apple, now all my gear looks like it was plucked out of Woody Allen's "Sleeper." I was so glad when the 70's ended, now I have to re-live that horrible decade each time I pick up my remote, ipod, etc. bleech.

    1. Re:why white? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, no, you got it wrong. The "everything white" decor only existed in sci-fi shows, not in real life. See Buck Rogers.

      1970s decor is the "fake woodgrain panel" look, as epitomized by the classic Atari game console. Even my old 70s television looks like it was made from fake wood. If you really wanted to make your iPod or Kindle have the 70s look, slap some paste-on woodgrain on the front. Like so: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XzjG65PlXj4/SluT0Q1RIiI/AAAAAAAAA-M/aZphER_TxdU/s400/woodipop.jpg

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:why white? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      woodgrain... woodgrain and black plastic. or fake chrome, don't forget the fake chrome. Everything was woodgrain with black plastic or fake chrome trim.

    3. Re:why white? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Why do all consumer electronic devices these days only come in -one- color, white. For the same reason paint primer and t-shirts come in white: it is the easiest color to cover over with another color. If it really bothers you, why not start your own business like this offering people a cheap way to change their "any color you want, as long as it's white" devices?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:why white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's on to something. Check out munich citys subway wagons. They were built in the 1970s: http://www.deutsches-museum.de/typo3temp/pics/0d7e7af34c.jpg

    5. Re:why white? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Don't forget 'avacado' and 'goldenrod'.

      And prism-y semi-transparent plastic with multicolored lights behind it.

    6. Re:why white? by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      iStyles.com and Decalgirl.com make nice, brightly colored skins for Kindles and Sony Readers, in addition to most other portable and semi-portable consumer electronic device under the sun. Hell, you can even get a matching set for your iPhone, Kindle, DS, and xbox.

    7. Re:why white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can replace the back with 5 different colors. You can also get a frame that covers the back and the frame around the front.

    8. Re:why white? by spitzig · · Score: 1

      And, lots of ORANGE. Shelves, carpet.

    9. Re:why white? by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Star Trek TNG did the fake wood paneling too, all over the ship.

  15. Obvious by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone should get a little Nookie!

    1. Re:Obvious by charlener · · Score: 1

      I did it for the nookie...and you can take that cookie.

    2. Re:Obvious by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      We're Geeks you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world now hates you.

    4. Re:Obvious by JonWan · · Score: 1

      We're Geeks you insensitive clod!

      lol... I read that as "We're Greeks". Kind of changes the meaning.

    5. Re:Obvious by PowerVegetable · · Score: 1

      According to the BN website ( http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/ ) you're also invited to "Protect your Nook". Sage advice, you should always keep your nook protected.

    6. Re:Obvious by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Cookies don't pull peoples' arms out of their sockets when they lose. Nookies have been known to do that.

    7. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait for Walmart to release an e-book called the e-Wook or the Wook-E.
      Either way George Lucas will probably get a cut...

    8. Re:Obvious by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Is that the Russell Brand version?

    9. Re:Obvious by charlener · · Score: 1

      get in line :P

    10. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say "Nook e-book" fast...

  16. Carrier is AT&T? by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "an unspecified carrier" seems to be AT&T. At the bottom of this page:

    http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/techspecs/

    is a link labeled "Check the coverage viewer" that points to

    http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/popUp_3g.jsp

  17. Book Selection by thesaint05 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a current Kindle 2 owner, the thing that matters the most (at least to me) is book selection. An e-reader is only as useful as the books you can put on it. B&Ns claims of "over a million titles available" (thereby claiming they have more titles then the what's available for the Kindle) is spurious at best, as I believe (IIRC) it includes a lot of free public domain books, books that are freely available on the Kindle, just not necessarily from the Kindle store. Sure, it's nice that they include more of those books in their own store, but that doesn't mean their EXCLUSIVE selection is any better. For anybody looking to compare Nook from Kindle, look at which books are available in the respective stores first.

    1. Re:Book Selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they have to have an EXCLUSIVE selection.
      That's what i like about paperbooks. I only need eyes to read them, and those aren't EXCLUSIVE.

    2. Re:Book Selection by elnyka · · Score: 1

      As a current Kindle 2 owner, the thing that matters the most (at least to me) is book selection. An e-reader is only as useful as the books you can put on it. B&Ns claims of "over a million titles available" (thereby claiming they have more titles then the what's available for the Kindle) is spurious at best, as I believe (IIRC) it includes a lot of free public domain books, books that are freely available on the Kindle, just not necessarily from the Kindle store. Sure, it's nice that they include more of those books in their own store, but that doesn't mean their EXCLUSIVE selection is any better. For anybody looking to compare Nook from Kindle, look at which books are available in the respective stores first.

      Bingo. One of the things that bother me as an otherwise happy Kindle 2 user is the selection of books available. Up and until recently, it was hard to get compsci/programming text books for it. Now that is changing. However, there is a dismal disparity between what is available for the Kindle and what's available in print. There is a large selection of books on Mathematics, Systems Engineering and Sci-Fi that I'd love to get for the Kindle, but they aren't available yet (and w/o any word when that will happen.)

      If B&N is the same as Amazon, it will be the same - a good e-reader but an anemic selection of commercial e-books available for it.

    3. Re:Book Selection by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      B&N also has this habit of taking great books that are out of copyright, putting them in nice bindings, and selling them cheap. If they're willing to let me have free public domain books through a convenient channel, that's good, isn't it?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Book Selection by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      As a current Kindle 2 owner, the thing that matters the most (at least to me) is book selection. An e-reader is only as useful as the books you can put on it.

      I've got three letters for you:

      P D F

    5. Re:Book Selection by day2day · · Score: 1

      I've found hundred of books on Amazon for free. Some that are only a few years old.

    6. Re:Book Selection by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      A PDF is a fixed-page format, not a reflowable format. Since most of those pages are fixed at 8.5x11", and the Kindle screen is about a third the size, has marginal DPI, and a slow refresh rate (making scrolling difficult) its not really a good choice. I've gotten a couple of PDF conversions that go through as pure images, and its not pleasant. From what I've heard using PDFs on Sony's reader with a similar format isn't especially pleasant either. This is also why its enabled on the Kindle DX (bigger screen).

      Should Amazon have put it as an option? I think so, but the existence of a PDF would not make up for a copy of a work in a good reflowable format (ePub or even plain text).

    7. Re:Book Selection by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You can already get those via the The Magic Catalog of Project Gutenberg E-Books. Available in mobi for Kindle and EPUB for Nook. Free.

  18. You can't delete my actual books... by RileyBryan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm not getting into this crap where you can control what I can and cannot read. Take your orwellian device and cram it.

    1. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by pyrosim · · Score: 1

      Sure they can. It's called "fire".

    2. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by jdunn14 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a book about that? I think someone burned my copy.

    3. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we left the Index behind a while ago. Let's not return to those times, shall we?

    4. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Sincerely.

    5. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Little bit of a drama queen, are we?

    6. Re:You can't delete my actual books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a little over the top, but it was surprising how little backlash the 1984 deletion really made. I guess somebody has to make a deal about it.

  19. So did everyone else pretty much by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "But remember the cautionary note B&N struck six years back when they got out of the e-book business."

    A great deal has changed in six years. Small computing has become more ubiquitous with the arrival of the netbook, high capacity flash devices are a lot more common, low power cpu's more common, wireless hot spots vastly more common...

    1. Re:So did everyone else pretty much by vlm · · Score: 1

      A great deal has changed in six years. Small computing has become more ubiquitous with the arrival of the netbook, high capacity flash devices are a lot more common, low power cpu's more common, wireless hot spots vastly more common...

      And e-ink displays, which I personally find icky due to the insanely slow screen updates, and light-gray on dark-gray ultra low contrast, but some people actually like that...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:So did everyone else pretty much by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Have you used one? They're pretty easy on the eyes, and screen refresh is easily handled by clicking "next page" when your eyes hit the last line or two of the page.

  20. How can you kill it?? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I travel a fair amount for work and I have seen literally 1 person using a kindle. I dont know..maybe people only use that at home, but to me it seems this is a device type with astonishingly little market penetration relative to actual books or ipod/iphone what have you.
    That being the case, the only thing to take away from the kindle is media hype. IMO at least.

    1. Re:How can you kill it?? by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should travel on the trains on the east coast. Every man in a suit I see going to work in NY in the morning is either reading a Kindle or busy working/reading on his laptop.
      A kindle only makes sense for a terrestrial traveler (WiFi download of books/news) who also uses it regularly. On a plane you can't get WiFi, nor are you going to travel to work daily by flight. So it makes no sense to use a Kindle there.
      Now this market might not be very large. But it is extremely rich (hedge funds, Wallstreeters or the average beautician in NY) and will last a while -- people have been commuting for work to NY for years and they won't start driving anytime soon.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    2. Re:How can you kill it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Where do you live and where are you traveling? I see Kindles nearly every single day on my 2-1/2 mile Metro ride in DC. That's less than 10 minutes on the train each way, but I'm pretty much guaranteed to see one.

    3. Re:How can you kill it?? by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      You can USE a kindle on a plane, you know. You just shouldn't be downloading new books for it. However, if you downloaded your newspaper and a novel or two while waiting on the tarmac, you'll be good for the whole flight. Your books are stored on the device when you're reading them.

      Also, $250 isn't exactly a whole lot when you consider that a lot of people of limited means spend more money than that on luxuries. One of my co-workers at a previous job earned about $12/hr, and spent her money on a $600 purse. Me? I'll buy a $10 purse and put $590 of awesome electronic toys inside it.

      Over the past year, I have seen 3 Kindles total on the DC Metro. However, I saw all three of those on the same metro ride home on the one day that I let the battery die, so I find it safe to assume that they've always been there, but I've been too busy reading my own Kindle to notice the other ones.

    4. Re:How can you kill it?? by __aahmnf219 · · Score: 1

      What's a paperback cost these days - about 8 bucks. Buy me 32 of these and I've spent my $250. This thing holds 1500 ebooks, before you add any memory expansion? I'm putting this in my shopping queue.

    5. Re:How can you kill it?? by zaq1xsw2cde9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kindle does not have WiFi capability, so it is irrelevant that you can't use WiFi on Flights. I only turn on my Wireless connection on my Kindle when I want to browse and download a book. So for a few minutes every few weeks, when I grab a few books for my queue. Other than that, it stays off for battery conservation.
      Also, Kindle is incredibly good for Flights. Especially long ones. I don't' travel every week, but I travel often, and between waiting at the airport and time on the plane, I can go through 2-4 books on a trip. A Kindle is much lighter to carry than a stack of books. plus if you run out, you can switch on at the airport and get another.

    6. Re:How can you kill it?? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Should have said 3G network or wireless signals, not Wifi.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    7. Re:How can you kill it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a plane you can't get WiFi, nor are you going to travel to work daily by flight. So it makes no sense to use a Kindle there.

      Nonsense. My kindle works perfectly well with the wireless turned off, which is how I keep it. Your books aren't downloaded every time you read them, they reside on the device. You can even load books on yourself using the USB connector. The only negative I can see for airplane use is if your neighbors are sleeping. Since the display is passive, you need to turn on the overhead light to see it.

    8. Re:How can you kill it?? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that I couldn't use it on, say, a boat or a plane because I need connectivity to read my books ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  21. Yeah, but how's the DRM? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If their titles are bogged down with DRM I'm not buying it. Not as a political or philosophical statement; I've just burned my hand on that stove too many times. The music companies have figured it out (or at least have been clubbed into submission). Hopefully the book publishers will come to their senses as well.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by mugnyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's more than that, when you think of all the times we've been burned:

        - Archivability ? physical book can go on shelf, can ebook be stored outside of reader device?
        - Format conversion? can I export passages as raw text?
        - Right of resale? used ebooks?
        - Annontations? can i write in margins?
        - Distribution? can I read the book aloud? to a group?
        - Expiration? can the content be revoked?

    2. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by jockeys · · Score: 1

      - Annontations? can i write in margins?

      can't comment on the rest, but from the nook site:

      "nook retains important reading rituals like bookmarking, making notes, and highlighting passages. "
      not sure exactly how that's implemented, but they've at least thought of it.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    3. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by RedEdison · · Score: 1

      B&N.com says the Nook will support ePUB and eReader formats. I think eReader is a derivative of the PDB, and I don't think it supports DRM. ePUB does support DRM - from Adobe, IIRC. No telling what the B&N store will sell, however.

    4. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I don't even care if the Nook bookstore is burdened with DRM.

      Can I put my own txt, rtf, html, pdf files on the thing and read them with a minimum of farting around?

    5. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Most of the eBook DRM formats have already been defeated. It's trivial these days to strip the DRM off of eBooks that you've purchased.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    6. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      Despite the FUD, you can do that with a Kindle as well. PDF is an issue, because it really has to reflow the text, or its painful to read -- thus why it relies on the email-based kludge (if B&N can come up with a good solution, more power to them).

      Other than that, take a .txt, .rtf, drm-free epub file, etc. and drop it onto the Kindle disk (it shows up like any other flash driver), and its there to be read on the home screen.

    7. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by DdJ · · Score: 1

      If the titles are bogged down with DRM, then I'm probably not buying the titles.

      I might still buy the device, because it has direct native support for putting a microSD card in your computer, dumping PDF and EPUB documents that don't have any DRM on to that card, moving the card to the Nook, and then reading those files. So even if B&N went out of business, I know I could read DRM-free PDF and EPUB books on it. And that's tempting, if enough other stuff lines up correctly.

    8. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by ferat · · Score: 1

      On top of the DRM, does it have a download limit like the Kindle? You can be cut off from your books on the kindle if you re-download them too many times (even to the same device). The publishers forced Amazon to include a download counter so you could be forced to rebuy the book after a while.

    9. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Archivability ? physical book can go on shelf, can ebook be stored outside of reader device?

      yes

          - Format conversion? can I export passages as raw text?

      no

          - Right of resale? used ebooks?

      no (but you can lend)

          - Annontations? can i write in margins?

      yes

          - Distribution? can I read the book aloud? to a group?

      Not relavant to digital versus analog books

          - Expiration? can the content be revoked?

      yes

      Anything else?

    10. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I like options.

    11. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Broken Topaz yet? I can't find anyone that has. What about B&N's proprietary?

    12. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by clifyt · · Score: 1

      "I might still buy the device, because it has direct native support for putting a microSD card in your computer....."

      Yeah, I just ordered a Kindle over the weekend, and apparently it is showing up tomorrow. I never planned on buying too many native books for it...maybe something throw away every now or then. Mostly, I wanted to be able to carry all my textbooks in one location.

      After downloading my chem book (*) the other day and realizing there was 2GB worth of data (thankfully chunked by chapter), I started thinking the whole kindle thing might not work out. I remembered the first had the memory card, and I thought I might have a few months before I needed to buy one, but did a little more investigation and realized the new ones don't have this. WTF!@!@!

      So, the brand new Kindle is going back soon...I have 30 days...that might tide me over until the Nook is released...having a microSD in there is the only real different I see.

      (BTW...I own all my books, and I plan on continuing to buy my paper books...and while I believe authors should be paid for their works as well as the companies that support them, I see NOTHING wrong in downloading an electronic copy of something I already paid for in a MUCH better format...paper is superior in all ways except for transportation).

    13. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by DdJ · · Score: 1

      ...having a microSD in there is the only real different I see.

      It's a big difference, if you consider the implications.

      Let's say you want to get a Word or RTF document on to your reader. Maybe, I don't know, the Word97 version of "Dive Into Python" or something. What do you do?

      As I understand it, with the Kindle, you do some trick to mail it to yourself, and it goes through Amazon's infrastructure and arrives on your device wirelessly. You're charged for this service, and if Amazon shuts the service down, you can't do this anymore. There may also be some way to use the web browser to do some of this, and that may get around the charge, but it also does require the currently-free-but-won't-stay-that-way-if-abused 3G wireless modem service in the thing. And I can't confirm that you can actually install content that way (though you could read a web version).

      With the Nook, you load up a tool to convert RTF to either PDF or EPUB, and you put the microSD card in a computer, load the file on to it, move the microSD card to the Nook, and start reading. This works even if all the world's GSM networks are turned off and aliens in orbital invasion pods are jamming our 802.11 signals.

      (That there is why removable media is a big deal to me, bigger than can be explained just by the ability to upgrade storage capacity. I take advantage of exactly the same thing on the Wii. I can pop an SD card into my laptop, load music and photo files on to it, pop it into my Wii, and use 'em.)

    14. Re:Yeah, but how's the DRM? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, with the Kindle, you do some trick to mail it to yourself, and it goes through Amazon's infrastructure and arrives on your device wirelessly.

      Or you plug the Kindle in via USB, and it appears as a hard drive. Then you drag your file into the documents folder, and eject the disk. Done.

      (Remembering to convert the file using the free open source mobipocket file conversion tools, mobi format basically being HTML in a Palm PDB database.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  22. Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Low sales ahead in the UK as British punters embarrassed to go into their book shops and libraries and ask for Nook e-books? :-)

    For non-UK folks, "Nooky" is cheeky old fashioned slang for sex, so "nooky book" would mean a porno novel....

    1. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by musicalmicah · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure just about everyone in the United States calls it "nookie" but gives it roughly the same definition.

    2. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      And few in the USA knows wtf a "punter" is!

    3. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by nametaken · · Score: 1

      It's used that way here in the US too. We even had a popular song by the craptacular band Limp Bizkit called, "Nookie" with the endlessly repeated line, "I did it all for the nookie".

    4. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      For non-UK folks, "Nooky" is cheeky old fashioned slang for sex

      It is here in the U.S., as well., though I thought it was spelled "nookie"...

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    5. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooky has a the same meaning in the US. Obviously they don't see this as a problem.

    6. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      You probably think colour, gaol and banque are spelled wrong too. ;)

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    7. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I hate to break this to you, but that term is pretty well spread out among most of the world. . . Hence Limp Bizkit song "I did it all for the nooky"

      Big rock huh? ;-)

    8. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nooks" was my name for my mother's breasts when I was just learning to talk (I think I had trouble saying "milk", and it turned into "nook". Presumably, my parents thought this was funny and didn't correct me).

      I'm sure I said "mummy's nooks" in public before I found out it wasn't a real word.

    9. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We non-UK folks are familiar with nookie

    10. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure "nooky" is not just a Britishism. I've heard and seen the word plenty of times in the US, although normally I've seen it spelled "nookie"(probably because we have to spell everything differently from you folks). In fact, the Limp Bizkit song "Nookie" was pretty popular a few years back.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    11. Re:Low sales ahead in the UK? Nook-e anybody?! by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      not to ruin the fun, but it apparently means "London slang for costumer, may also be used for "johns" (among prostitutes and police agents), people who watch porn movies or go to strip joints regularly."

  23. Book Price by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

    Many of the books seem to be ~$11; this is 10% more than the kindle. That adds up pretty quickly.

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:Book Price by frusengladje · · Score: 1

      Here's a comparison:

      Cryptonomicon:

      Kindle version: $6.39
      Nook version: $11.99

      Just a book I picked at random.

  24. international? by Bysshe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    does it hvae the inernation wireless feature that the latest kindle has?

    If not its not a kindle killer. Remember folks, there is the REST OF THE WORLD

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    1. Re:international? by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      International is important, but if you notice lots of kindle versions are not available for international regions (why, oh why???). So I'd much rather have WiFi (which can go through proxys, if need be) and *all* texts available for download than to have wireless (which tags me in an international location).

      Then again B&N will likely not have as many ebooks as Amazon, though.

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    2. Re:international? by fractalVisionz · · Score: 1
      From http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/support/:

      Q. Can I use my nook while traveling abroad?
      A. Yes, when you travel abroad, you can read any files that are already on your nook. You can connect to Wi-Fi hotspots that do not use proxy security settings, such those commonly used in hotels, and download eBooks and subscriptions already in your online digital library. You cannot, however, purchase additional eBooks and subscriptions.

      Q. Will new issues of eNewspapers and eMagazines be downloaded to my nook while I'm traveling?
      A. Yes, if you are traveling in the United States, or if you are abroad but connected to a supported Wi-Fi hotspot, new issues are delivered to your online digital library in both cases. When travelling abroad without Wi-Fi access, new issues are not downloaded to your nook (automatically or manually).

      So no, it isn't international.

  25. Wireless by AT&T by standbypowerguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The wireless service is provided by AT&T. Says so at http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/

    --
    This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
    1. Re:Wireless by AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear that iPhone? GET OFF MY NETWORK.

      I'm trying to download Harry Potter and you're filling up the tubes with enormous amounts of material.

  26. More importantly by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    Is this an iPod Touch killer also? I'm waiting for a hand-held android device that doesn't require a cell plan.

  27. I already own several Kindle Killers. by JoshDM · · Score: 3, Funny

    And like everyone else, I call them "hammers".

    1. Re:I already own several Kindle Killers. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I call mine a 1 mega watt laser, but each to there own.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Let's see... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    What's not to like about Barnes and Noble's new e-book reader?

    PDF support? Check.
    WiFi? Check
    eInk? Check
    SD reader? Check
    Battery life? 10 days

    I'm not seeing a downside yet.

  29. Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV... by BLKMGK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can read PDF just fine - the conversion process can be done in multiple ways and costs me a few pennies down to nothing for the Kindle. So that's no biggie. The MP3 player? I have that on my multiple year old Kindle too - I have YET to EVER use it so that's no biggie. The expandable memory? I have that on mine too but it's SD and they killed it on the new version - stupid of them IMO. That said the new Kindle has more base memory and quite frankly if it's just books you're putting on there it will hold a metric shit-ton of books! The average paperback book I get is under a meg and I have gigs of storage on my device. So, while a nice touch this advantage isn't that big a deal to me.The color touch screen for nav I don't get, what's the advantage? If it uses more power then I don't want it - make the device like the Energizer Bunny and last a long long time and I'm happy. Things like refresh rate changing pages are a bigger deal to me than this gimmick, honestly refresh on my old unit is okay by me.

    Having owned and used an eBook reader for a good long time now I can tell you that capacity, battery life, and coverage for the radio are big concerns for ME. My very biggest concern is availability of BOOKS at decent prices - more magazines would be nice. That's what I am buying the thing for and if it cannot give me a ton of access to books then it's worthless. Right now Amazon gives me all the books I can absorb, with rare exception, at somewhat decent discount rates. Lending is nice but 14 days isn't long enough for most - I've seen how slow some people are with reading! Give it a full screen that does color I might be more interested but not at the expense of most of the battery life.

    Really for me this is a yawner unless it starts a price war on content. I know I'm locked in with Amazon DRM but I also know how to break it if I really wanted to - I've got the tools. If I had NO eReader then yeah sure this would be more interesting but their past with eBooks would give me pause . Anyway, nice to see more entries into this realm. Perhaps with more and more readers coming out someone will make the breaking of Amazon DRM a little bit easier and more automated? That would be helpful!!

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  30. Ebook Price by Z1NG · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of ebooks and dedicated ebook readers. I have one major problems with them, I can often pick up a used copy of the book for a significant savings over the ebook price.

  31. How tough is it by InPastaItrust · · Score: 1

    I can stick a book on my pocket and know that when I pull it out it will still work. E-book readers are way to easy to break. Was reading my kindle in bed went to refill my coffee sat back in bed and crunch 300 dollars in the waste basket.

    1. Re:How tough is it by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Is your bed made of concrete?

      I have had my kindle fall out of my car, dropped it down a flight of stairs, and spilled wine on it. It has no problems. How could you possibly have broken it by sitting on it in a soft bed? Did you take a running start and knock it out of a 3 story window?

  32. Plastic Logic's QUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plastic Logic's QUE will be released in January at CES:
    http://www.slashgear.com/plastic-logic-que-wireless-ebook-reader-gets-ces-launch-1860791

    "QUE will be able to download ebooks from the Barnes and Noble store either via WiFi or integrated 3G (courtesy of AT&T in the US)."

  33. I'll Show Them by auctoris · · Score: 1

    I never bought DRM music so I'm not going to buy DRM books. I always bought the CDs and ripped the music in a friendly non-DRM format. Now, for books, I'll just scan each of my books into a friendly non-DRM format--one page at a time. That'll show the book publishers that their DRM can't affect my life!

  34. Devices devices devices by mugnyte · · Score: 1

    As a suggestion to manufacturers: Please offer a laptop lid or overlay with an eInk screen & drivers, and leave the rest to us.

      The closer we see these things with open-able underpinnings, the more I'll trust them. If it simply started as an eInk peripheral (does that word date me?), I think we'd be way ahead of the game. But then again the publishers would be sour on that, I'm sure.

  35. It's not obvious? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    This will have DRM. It's that simple.

    When you lend a book, you lock yourself out of that title on your reader for 14 days (Well, it's probably configurable up to 14 days). The copy sent to your friend is a time limited DRM version that self destructs (does not allow access) after the loan period, and can't be re-forwarded. Think of it as a more restrictive copy-once version of DRM.

    This means two things
    (1) it will be cracked and there will be ebooks floating around, but it will be fringe in quantity
    (2) you can lend your ebook very similarly to lending a real book (you can't read it but your friend can), with the "bonus" that you automatically get the book back in two weeks.
    (3) this means you can't give away or resell with this mechanism

    Take these as the advantages and disadvantages that they are. It's a step up from Kindle.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:It's not obvious? by Knara · · Score: 1

      King Arthur: "This means two things"

      Sir Lancelot: "Three, sir"

      Arthur: "What"

      Lancelot: "It means three things, not two"

      Arthur: "Ah, right. Now then, this means one of five things"

    2. Re:It's not obvious? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Kindle's Topaz DRM has yet to be cracked (unlike its Mobi DRM), and there isn't even a converter to move books out of Sony's lrf format even without DRM.

  36. Killer? Stop, to, much, stichic... by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    The Kindle Killer Arrives

    With all the Apple news in the last 24hrs, I immediately thought this was the Apple tablet when I read the RSS feed...

    (sigh, pwnage from the Apple marketing group, crap!).


    Android is great, we all know it, but I guess the only way to become legendary technology is to hype is up as much as any Apple product.

  37. No Wall Street Journal - Dealbreaker for Many by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This device appears to be superior to the Kindle in every way. I told my friend just now, "hey, I know you're interested in the Kindle, but you should wait for the Nook!" I explained how it was better. His only question was "Cool, but can it get the Wall Street Journal like the Kindle?" I checked. It's not on BN's ebook site. Fail. Content is still king.

    1. Re:No Wall Street Journal - Dealbreaker for Many by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      This device appears to be superior to the Kindle in every way. I told my friend just now, "hey, I know you're interested in the Kindle, but you should wait for the Nook!" I explained how it was better. His only question was "Cool, but can it get the Wall Street Journal like the Kindle?" I checked. It's not on BN's ebook site. Fail. Content is still king.

      And this is a situation that can never be resolved for as long as B&N is selling eBooks?

      I'm sure right now B&N really doesn't have a compelling reason to offer the WSJ. Doesn't mean they won't offer it when the product is released. After all, of all the devices right now that support the B&N ebooks (iPhone, Blackberry, WinMo(?), Symbian), I'm sure they can't uh, access the WSJ via some other method (say, the built-in web browsers). But once this is released, then the WSJ may very well be a subscription option since you can't use nook to read the online version. (Or so it appears).

  38. eBook readers Still "for Suckers Only" by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    Only in US.
    Books can not be given away.

    "Pass"

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  39. Remember the prophet McClure by Itninja · · Score: 1

    "Who knows what [products] they'll [promote] between now and the time the [ebook concept] becomes unprofitable? -- Troy McClure

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  40. they may have left, but they came back.... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

    (But remember the cautionary note B&N struck six years back when they got out of the e-book business.)

    That may be, but they've been back in for a little while now.

    As an aside, I've been using eReader for years, first on Windows Mobile, and now on my iPod touch. It's a nice reader, they have a decent selection of books, and it's easy to make your own from converted text or html files.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  41. Piracy? by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

    My Android phone has a PDF reader on it. How will B&N prevent me from getting that program on their device and using books I downloaded illegally?

    Imagine reading a pirated android development book on a rooted B&N Nook.... :: head explodes ::

    1. Re:Piracy? by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Why is that a concern for you as a consumer?

      I would assume that to be B&N's issue, not yours. Unless of course the ability to pirate things causes you to no longer wish to purchase. That would be like not buying an mp3 player because it will play music that wasn't purchased from amazon or itunes.

    2. Re:Piracy? by DelitaTheFridge · · Score: 1

      Imagine rooting the device and then having it create an ad hoc wireless network for your laptop to connect to, giving you free internet for "life". That sounds a lot better than a few pirated books.

    3. Re:Piracy? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      I think you have the DRM backwards. The Kindle (and I imaging the Nook) allows you to read non-DRM content just fine. It is the DRM content that the device will impose restrictions on. There are tons of legal places to get free (either a free license like Creative Commons or public domain works like Project Gutenburg) ebooks for whatever you want to use to read them. Be it a Kindle (or whatever ebook reader), a laptop (or netbook, whatever), or a mobile device. I've seen many people on forums talk about using these devices and never once using DRM content. If you are opposed to DRM (as I am), by doing the same thing you are voting with your wallet against DRM.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  42. Useless if you're no in the US by delirium28 · · Score: 1

    Up here in the great white north we are still left out in the cold wrt eBook readers. Even the Kindle isn't shipping here yet (assuming I would want one, which I don't because of their damn kill switch). So I have an impromptu "Ask Slashdot" question. Does anyone know of a decent eBook reader that isn't DRM crippled that can display PDFs? And I'm looking for real owners, not responses from people who have read a spec on a website somewhere.

    --
    Who is John Galt?
    1. Re:Useless if you're no in the US by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of PDFs in the world: those where the text is plainly in the document in ASCII form (or maybe compressed) and those where the document is a collection of bitmaps, one per page.

      Google Books uses the latter form.

      Bitmap-style PDFs are never going to be really usable on a eReader device of any sort unless it has a screen the size of the original page that the bitmap was taken from.

      The text form of a PDF could be rendered in the original page form, which is how the Kindle DX works I believe. Again, the display isn't quite large enough so you have to try to zoom, pan and scroll. Not an optimal experience.

      The key is probably to reformat the text dynamically such that the page now fits nicely on the reader screen. This may be possible with lots of PDFs but it certainly doesn't help with Google Books and may not be much help with a large percentage of other PDFs as well. Which is why it probably isn't being done.

      Sorry, but the PDF document format is pretty much a page description language and with an eReader the last thing you want is a page that is laid out for a much bigger surface. I don't think any eReader is going to work very well with PDF documents, ever. Certainly none of the existing ones work well with them.

    2. Re:Useless if you're no in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I and my SO have the http://www.bookeen.com/specs/ebook-CybookGen3.aspx. It's as DRM-free as the books you load on it are (see baen.com).

      We started with one but had to get another as there was too much competition for it. Now we both prefer it over a dead tree book.

    3. Re:Useless if you're no in the US by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just what is the deal with everyone falling over themselves to use PDF? It's a prepress format and excels at that, but for screen reading it's pretty much useless. Proving a PDF download as a copy of a paper document is just laziness because you're just using the same file that you sent to the printers.

      Hopefully when people start to get serious about ebooks we'll see a more flexible refolowable format. Like, oh I don't know, html?

    4. Re:Useless if you're no in the US by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony PRS-505, and it's great. You can use DRM'd stuff with it, but it will accept essentially any format so you're not restricted in any way from reading anything you want to. There is a open source e-book manager, calibre, which will convert among formats if you have something weird the reader doesn't like. Also, calibre will automatically download articles from any website that posts them, for free, including expensive magazines like The Economist. It supports pay-sites as well.

      As far as PDFs go, though, as the other guy said, you're pretty much out of luck. Sony touts the ability to re-flow PDFs, but it doesn't work - at all - for something with a complicated layout, which is the only kind of thing you should be using a PDF for anyway. Trying to zoom and pan around the PDF is a fruitless exercise in frustration. It's too bad, because it would be excellent for so many purposes (journal articles that aren't available as plain text, lonely planet guides whose PDFs are formatted with two pages per pdf page which makes them unusable, etc).

      If you're dead-set on PDFs, wait for something better. If you just want to read books, e-book readers today are excellent.

  43. Will it work... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 1

    with Animal Crossing? Then you can have Tom Nook's Nook.

  44. Lending by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

    Lending is definitely the killer feature here. Look at what happened to the iPod after Zune introduced sharing.

  45. I like my KindleDX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it can also render PDFs. What I like is the size. It is about the same size as a standard piece of paper. Not the screen, but the entire device. The screen is somewhat smaller than US letter/A4 paper. I also like that I can hook it to my PC via USB and it will emulate a hard drive. This lets me backup the device locally. I do wish that it had the ability to use an SD card. It's hard wired to 2Gb of memory.

  46. Screen size? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I can't find a screen size. In a world of mm variation comparisons, I can only presume that the eInk screen on this reader is smaller than the Kindle2 screen.

    Sadly, it's also not as svelte. Yes, it's slightly smaller in footprint, but it's noticably thicker. If Apple has taught us anything, thin is the cool part of being small. And it has shorter overall battery life, even with the extra 10% weight.

    That's not to say the device isn't cool. I'm a little concerned about the touchscreen keyboard, but chicklets suck too, so maybe it's a wash. The color screen is really just eye candy, but it is kind of neat.

    I'm holding out for the XL version (there has to be one, right?) 'cause most of my references I use are letter sized paper, and squeezing them to novel size isn't quite going to do it for my aging eyes.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Screen size? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I can't find a screen size. In a world of mm variation comparisons, I can only presume that the eInk screen on this reader is smaller than the Kindle2 screen."

      no, you can only presume you don't know the size. I can presume you don't know how to use a website:

      http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/features/techspecs/

      http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/compare/

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Screen size? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Really, I see " 6" diagonal display size " on the chart, but no X-Y dimension. As anyone who has compared monitors, different aspect ratios have noticeably different areas. The unit dimensions aren't give as a single number. The 3.5" color display is also a bit fuzzy - H? D? but it has one and the Kindle does not, so that's sort of a distinguising feature rather than a direct comparison.

      I'm still looking for the size of the display on the "Tech Specs" page. Unless you count the color display size, which isn't listed as H or V or D, and is essentially an interface pad rather than a reading area. Feel free to point out a list of the screen size or a diagram of the actual screen with dimensions on the techspecs page. I await your webpage reading brilliance.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  47. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by FunkyELF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MP3 support on this thing would be cool.

    You download an e-book along side the audio version.

    You're at home reading your book on the Nook and when you hop in the car, it can play you the audio while you're driving. When you're ready to return to reading, it has your spot saved.

    I'll use this slashdot post as evidence when I get in lawsuit over who patented the idea first.

  48. Still too pricey by bhagwad · · Score: 1

    $260? I'll buy an ereader when the price drops below $100. Till then I'll read on my handheld (iPod Touch as of now) as I've been doing for the past 5 years...

    1. Re:Still too pricey by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Good for you, but do you realize you get free Wi-Fi and 3G? A six inch screen?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Still too pricey by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's also a one functionality device which I have to think about carrying everywhere unlike an all in one handheld. I would buy it at the current price if it was everything I needed - in essence a computer where I can download books and read them.
      Till then, no go I'm afraid...

  49. Tom Nook? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Thomas' English Muffins Inc.

    I'll assume this has zero to do with Tom Nook from Animal Crossing series.

  50. Slashdot reader want to know... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Is the display any better than the Kindle at displaying porn?

    What can you actually display on the tiny color touchscreen? It looks best suited for software-defined buttons.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Slashdot reader want to know... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Is the display any better than the Kindle at displaying porn?

      Do you usually get yours as PDF or ePub? If so yes...

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Slashdot reader want to know... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      All your vintage B&W pr0n will render just fine.

      You nailed the touchscreen part. I actually kind of like it, if it's organized well. I'd go so far as to say this could be an awesome multi-use device. With touchscreen nav and the right software, sifting through albums for music would be easy. Depending on how quick the screen refreshes (and I think it's fast enough) it could be a neat GPS device - either for walking or driving (of course, there's the lack of GPS receiver...but that's easily fixed in the next release). Of course, the OS will probably be locked and nobody will develop cool apps for it, so we'll be stuck with a lousy software interface.

      Personally, I want an app that stores all of my "frequent shopper" cards so they can scan my device at the cash register. The useless tool possibilities are endless!

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  51. No Wikipedia on Nook by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the Kindle offer free, unlimited, live access to Wikipedia? Seems like they left THAT off their feature comparison chart....

  52. I did it all for tanuki by tepples · · Score: 1

    Everyone should get a little Nookie!

    "So you can take that cookie and stick it up your..." -- Fred Durst

  53. Android OS.. what? by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

    Taken from Googles Android platform page: "Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications."

    And that's probably the thing that makes it fly, it unifies the software stack and a big corp. is behind it. Guess that's a good thing.

    Still, calling Android an OS is a misnomer, as the Java framework is the crucial part about it.

    1. Re:Android OS.. what? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Java isn't sexy, Android is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Paper Book DRM? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some feature that would cause my paper books to come flying back after 14 days sounds good to me. I've had too many good books go out on a one way loan. If I give you my book, I don't ever want to see it again. However, if I loan you my book, I want the damn thing back. OK? Like those Baroque Cycle books and the Otherland hardcovers. You know who you are.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Paper Book DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it's safe to assume you haven't received your copies of the Baroque Cycle books because nobody can finish the friggen things

  55. Those sneaky bastards at B&N by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're one step ahead of you my infringing friend.

    By including a PDF reader and wifi, they have prevented you from surreptitiously rooting their device to install such a reader, and then hacking the hardwired interface to load your ill-gotten reading material.

    So go find all the pirated books you want - B&N has already won by taking away the thrill of victory by allowing you to load and read them as part of the basic package.

    You can hang your head in shame, knowing that The Man has beaten you again. ;-)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  56. An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, too. by joh · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read more than 120 books now on my iPod touch (which is very much an iPhone with no phone), no problems. Yes, a larger screen would be nice and you have to set a sensible brightness level (too bright in a rather dark environment is bad) but mostly I just forget that I'm reading on an electronic device and not a real book. I just read. There's not much more to say here, I'd say. I think the e-ink displays are overrated. They may have some slight advantages but they're far from perfect.

    And the iPod has the advantage of being small and light enough to be safely held in one hand and to go into any pocket, which is great. And compared to most ebook readers the iPod is cheap. And it can be *so* much more than just an ebook reader.

  57. no need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh, i really enjoy my kindle, and don't see any need for upgrading in the next 10 years or so.

  58. You can put .pdf's on a Kindle too by sirwired · · Score: 1

    If you want to put pdfs on a Kindle, you have five options:

    1) e-mail the pdf to Amazon, they convert it, and send it wirelessly to your Kindle for $0.15/MB
    2) e-mail the pdf to Amazon, they convert it, e-mail it back to you for free, and you transfer it onto the device using USB
    3) You use any one of a number of different conversion packages to convert it yourself and transfer it using USB.
    4) You download a .pdf Kindle plugin off the web and install it on your Kindle. (No it isn't Amazon-supported, but it works just fine.)
    5) Buy a Kindle DX, which handles them natively.

    SirWired

    1. Re:You can put .pdf's on a Kindle too by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Do any of your 5 options recognize that the DX has the page's margin built in (corporealized as the plastic bezel surrounding the display,) and so rendering the PDF's own margin is not only pointless, but undesirable?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
  59. The Fountainhead is first Image on Nook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just found it interesting that Ayn Rands book "The Fountainhead" is the image chosen to be on the first pictures of the Nook.

  60. International version by Pento · · Score: 1

    Q. I don't live in the U.S. Can I buy a nook?
    No. At this time, nook is not for sale outside the U.S.

    Well, that sucks. It's not going to kill the Kindle if 95% of the world's population can't use it.

  61. And yet... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    And yet... All I can think of is, "Wow, this means the Kindle 3 is going to be out soon, and kick ass."

  62. BN eBooks are 25% higher than Amazon Kindle titles by MacSteveT · · Score: 1

    The device looks nice, but a quick comparison of some of my existing Kindle titles/prices vs. B&N eBook titles/prices indicates that B&N eBook prices are a full 25% higher than Amazon. A Kindle edition of a reasonably popular paperback costs $6.39, while the same title at B&N for their eBook edition is $7.99... whats up with that?

  63. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metric shit-ton? Can you convert that to English shit-tons? Or better yet, slugs?

  64. Place your bets now: flamebait or funny? by pjt33 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's quite simple. A punt is a flat-bottomed boat which is propelled by pushing a pole against the river bed (similar to a gondola). A punter is to Oxford and Cambridge as a gondolier is to Venice. (Don't worry if you've never heard of Oxford, Cambridge, or Venice: they're in Europe).

  65. "odd name" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea why people keep on bringing up the name of this device after Amazon named theirs "Kindle" which is, IMO, one of the dumbest and most irritating device names in recent memory.

  66. Skewed comparison by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    So their just released gadget is uber-cooler the previous generation of Kindles? Whoopee. In related news, the Zune HD compares favorably to the original iPod. My DX has native PDF support, an MP3 player, and actually displays on a non-dinky screen. The only advantage their device seems to have is wifi, which is nice. But surfing the web (and I don't see any mention of the phrase "browse the web" anywhere. Does the machine not have a web browser? It says "browse and shop", but that's not exactly clear cut. Browse the B&N catalog, or browse the web?) on an e-reader sucks anyway. Nook is still just an e-ink display (with a color touch screen at the bottom, for added experience of....um....touching things in color?) for e-books.

    Don't want amazon (or B&N, or Sony, etc.) 'killing' your books? Don't buy from them. Buy from publishers that support some level of openness. My Kindle exists for a couple reasons: Disposable literature, Freebie classics from amazon, A gadget-y way to get the Free Press, and making sure that I no longer have to find space for my mountain of O'Reilly books (and keeping them at my fingertips when I really, *really* need to look something up).

    E-Readers are gadgets, and they probably always will be. They're handy gadgets, but they are probably relegated to a niche market.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  67. And free text internet by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    No free browser, apparently?

    Seriously, a good chunk of these missing features (PDF support, for example) are in the Kindle DX, and could be backported to the Kindle 2 with a firmware / OS update. One I would wager is being approved right... about... now.

  68. Arrived? by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    I thought that it arrived already some years ago. Is mainly for children, and have less battery life, but have a foldable keyboard (you can see it as table or as notebook), can run full linux distributions, and even you can see it in color instead of BN and have a screen better than Kindle (at least according to this history).

    A shame that book industry didnt jump at it when was the right moment.

  69. Lame. by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Funny

    No unicorn. Less controversy than a Kindle. Lame.

  70. e-Ink==fragile by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    Having owned a Kindle 2, I am not a fan of the e-Ink screens. They break way too easily, especially for a device one hopes to travel with. I also found the contrast to be merely borderline acceptable for my 41-year-old eyes (fine in bright light, bad in dim light).

    After my screen broke in a 2-foot fall from a coffee table, I was completely unmotivated to replace the Kindle. If you get one of these things, treat it carefully!

  71. How about a web browser? by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

    Any news on a web browser being built-in with free 3G like all the Kindles? I have a Kindle 1 and was going to buy the International until I heard about this new reader. It looks nice, but I've found I actually enjoy reading blogs and other sites on my Kindle. This will be what makes/breaks it for me about jumping ship from Kindle to B&N.

    1. Re:How about a web browser? by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Just found the answer over at Engadget: No web browser So Kindle 2 International for me. But I'll hold off until after Thanksgiving to see if Amazon reacts but cutting prices/doing a bundle.

  72. A nookie book by baomike · · Score: 1

    What better place for your porn?

  73. They changed the original text about loaning... by stangbat · · Score: 1

    When the Nook site went live early, the information on lending stated: "You can lend many of your eBooks one time for a maximum of 14 days." To me this means you can only loan a book out one time, ever. Now the site states: "Most eBooks can be lent for up to 14 days at a time." No mention of "one time." Better. Not ideal, but I can probably live with this as long as there is not a restriction on how many times a book can be loaned out. The inability to loan books is what totally killed my interest in the Kindle. I'm still sticking with dead tree books right now, but I have to admit that I'm now at least tempted by an ebook reader.

    1. Re:They changed the original text about loaning... by stangbat · · Score: 1

      I did some more digging. Under the Support section of the site, it still says "one time". Under the Features section of the site there is no mention of one time.

      Still clear as mud.

    2. Re:They changed the original text about loaning... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      That word "most" makes me suspect it'll be like the Kindle text-to-speech and DRM-free options--something that the publishers will be allowed to turn off. In which case, good luck finding popular books that you can loan.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  74. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on, obviously you already have a kindle so you have no reason to get this. but for everyone else who doesn't have a ebook reader, the Nook is an obvious choice. Same price but with more features. So stop crying.

  75. It supports epub by spammb · · Score: 1

    http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/compare/ says it supports epub, eReader, and PDF. epub is an open standard according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_e-book_formats#International_Digital and you can convert docs in lots of other formate to epub.

    Seems you'll be able to read any document on this device. Very nice.

    1. Re:It supports epub by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Yay, apparently gutenberg often supports epub as well.

      I've been reading ebooks on my G1, not too bad actually. Aldiko is what I'm currently using.

  76. PDF Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with pdf support on the kindle is how to scale a page meant to be 8.5 * 11 to much smaller than that.
    This device faces the same problem. Your options are still hassle with pan + zoom or squint alot.

    On a side note, why in the world is there a color touchscreen LCD on this? is that necessary to select books? Would i rather have more battery life / cheaper price, or a lcd screen on my bok reader. . .

    A Kindle killer is an ebook reader this size that costs 50$ OR an ebook reader that is color 8.5 * 11.

    How is this a "killer" product when it is basically the exact same thing? As far as i can tell, it is the exact same size, costs the same, and does the same thing as the kindle.

    The real selling point of these devices isn't that they can play MP3s. Its content. Who ever has the books and the newspapers / magazines will win this war.

  77. Their ad should be... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Limp Bizkit doing a song... "I did all for the Nook[ie] so you can take that Kindle... and stick it up your ass!"

  78. I want this instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.entourageedge.com

  79. Stop with the "killer" stuff already by BearRanger · · Score: 1

    At best a successful product "killer" merely fractures the market. It doesn't really do anything to eliminate the dominant product. If there were ever a truly successful iPod "killer", iPhone "killer", Microsoft Office "killer", or whatever there would still be plenty of people who used and enjoyed the market leader. And plenty of second place vendors would be quite happy with their slice of the marketplace even if they didn't manage to commit market leader product homicide.

    Something tells me Apple is quite happy and successful with their slice of the PC market. As I suspect SanDisk is with their slice of the personal music player market. Barnes and Noble could do well in this market without displacing the Kindle, just as Pepsi does well without surpassing Coke.

  80. Kindle International lacks a browser by Idayen · · Score: 1

    Kindle has the web browser removed for international version according to wifinetnews. Sadly this means I will be waiting for a next generation ebook reader or software update that includes a browser as I live in Europe currently.

    1. Re:Kindle International lacks a browser by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to amazon, the web browser working is dependent on what country you are in. Check the drop down on the Kindle International listing.

      --
      Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
  81. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by Compuser · · Score: 1

    The LCD screen is supposed to be touchscreen in which case I should be able to write notes with it. A book with the ability to scribble on the side is actually the beginning of something useful. Now I just need color e-ink and then I might buy it.

  82. Yawn by Flentil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would like to have one of these devices, but not until they stop charging such ridiculous prices. E-book readers will never go mainstream until they cost less than $50. Eventually they should just give these things away.

  83. Sony = better by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    The non-wired Sony ereaders are superior. The battery life is measured in weeks, not hours or days as with these wired devices. Any one who still reads books really doesn't need to be able to download books on the fly when they probably will load far more books on to their device than they can hope to read in many years. I can see wired if you absolutely must be able to download the daily newspaper but I find the battery life trade off vs marginal convenience (news papers are still beter read at newspaper size).

    So please, keep your kindles and nooks.

  84. "Lending", eh? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Well, since the Kindle and ebook readers are still new, this "we are better because we let you lend" idea has a little bit of logic still, but the minute that the market phases over to ebooks being the preferred format for enough of the customers, we're going to see a revolution in the book publishing field, just like what has happened in the music field, where DRM is fading from memory.

    Most people are just not going to stand for the stupid restrictions which DRM places on them, and they will obtain, somehow, non-DRMed copies of their books in order to be able to still do what they think they should be able to do with them. And when going to get the copies of the books they bought legally, they will discover how available and easy it is to obtain books which they didn't buy. In addition, there will be tons of public domain and freely licensed content which will be easily found via the wonders of the net, search engines, and the inevitable rise of sites which try to survive based on replacing the edit/review/recommend function of current publishers for this wealth of free content.

    To sum up, the current business model of book publishers isn't going to survive. My guess is that its new form will include a lot of mutations of the Street Performer Protocol.

  85. The Nook E-Book... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...I can't wait to hear Jon Stewart say that out loud.

    rj

  86. Not to mention: by fyngyrz · · Score: 0

    What's not to like about Barnes and Noble's new e-book reader?

    The price. They need to use a razor blade model; reader cheap and easily replicable, media priced as market value has it.

    Why? Because when an e-book is $9.99, and a paperback is the same (or less), and the paperback continues to offer advantages over the e-book (like, actually owning the damned thing and not requiring batteries), the value of the reader as an usurper of your rights is more than a little questionable.

    For instance, the Kindle app for the iPod adds no cost to the iPod; but turns the iPod into a full-fledged reader with a metric poop-ton more capability than any standalone reader. That's the way to do a reader. Standalone readers that cost more than say, a book does, are silly. They're crippled as compared to most general purpose devices, they fiddle with your ownership of the media in various ways, and consequently they really don't deserve the under-the-arm or handbag space that, say, a general purpose tablet or iPod does.

    When I see a dedicated reader they want hundreds of dollars for, I just laugh. And... the moment a viable tablet computer comes out (probably in the spring, and probably from Apple), that will be the end of e-readers unless, as I suggested above, they adopt the razor blade model.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Not to mention: by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy a Kindle to have the perfect book reader. I bought it to have an e-Ink screen attached to a cellular modem and a flash drive. If you don't want that, don't buy one, but if you really like to read books, there is no comparison to reading on an iPod, or a computer, or anything else. e-Ink looks like print.

    2. Re:Not to mention: by c_forq · · Score: 1

      According to the articles I've read they are doing this right. They mentioned being able to have the book across several devices (Mac, PC, iPhone), being able to read a book a day in a Barnes & Noble store (free), and while they haven't said anything about other applications running on it (but it is Android with a USB port so I'm sure it will happen if they want it to or not) but at the same time have hinted that it may be in the future.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    3. Re:Not to mention: by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      My sweetheart has the latest Kindle. We both have iPod touches. We both prefer the touches. They're easier to handle, store and carry, a *lot* faster for page changes and etc., and you can read them all night in a pitch dark bedroom without disturbing the other and with less physical accommodation. And they do about a million other things the Kindle can't do. Kindle is a total loss by comparison, *plus* it costs far more for what it does. You prefer a one-job, slow, cumbersome, B&W reader that costs you hundreds for no particular added functionality? Fine. But I'm not betting you're typical. The market has more sense. That's why iPod touches sell in numbers Amazon can only dream about for the Kindle.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Not to mention: by babyrat · · Score: 1

      Because when an e-book is $9.99, and a paperback is the same (or less), and the paperback continues to offer advantages over the e-book

      I can't argue with that statement. Perhaps the Barnes and Noble people are planning to make their e-books cheaper. Oh wait, let's check the article

      Gizmodo, first showed leaked images of the Nook last week. The blog said that B&N will be discounting titles heavily in their electronic format, which is as is should be (no paper, printing or shipping costs). The Nook will also be able to get books from the Google Books Project

    5. Re:Not to mention: by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kindle is not a Touch. It's not meant to be a Touch. It's for reading books. And for that purpose, it's way better than a Touch.

      You're right: I'm not typical. I read a lot - I read one book a week when I'm working 12 hours a day, at least one book a day on vacation. I have disposable income galore. I don't read in the dark; I just don't go to bed until I'm ready to sleep or do other bed things. As for speed, it's only unreadable for half a second or less - about as long as it takes to turn a real page. If you have a device with a large screen, like a Kindle, you're not turning the page more than 2-3 times a minute.

    6. Re:Not to mention: by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Because when an e-book is $9.99, and a paperback is the same (or less),

      Current Amazon prices of a popular book (Dan Brown's latest):

      • Hardcover: $16.47
      • Paperback: $16.74 (large print version)
      • Kindle: $9.99

      So the electronic version is significantly cheaper. Same holds true for an older book (The DaVinci Code, $9.99 in paperback, only $7.59 in Kindle version).

    7. Re:Not to mention: by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for that purpose, it's way better than a Touch.

      This claim is very much debatable. If your vision is very poor (meaning, you can't read an iPod), then sure, you need a big reader. But there are very few other features the Kindle offers that actually make it a better choice when you actually look at them carefully.

      You're right: I'm not typical. I read a lot - I read one book a week

      A book a week? I read a book a day. Here's some of my library, all pre-e-reader. I have more books just packed into the shelves on the ceiling -- well over a thousand -- than most people even own. Reading a book has always been part of my daily routine. So I really don't have time for e-ink to ghost up into readability. When I turn a page, I want to continue reading. And I read fast... my page consumption, with the smallest font, is quick on either Kindle or iPod. But the Kindle makes me wait after every page. The iPod does not.

      I don't read in the dark

      [laughs] of course you don't -- you have a Kindle, you can't read in the dark.

      As for speed, it's only unreadable for half a second or less - about as long as it takes to turn a real page

      And you think this is a good thing? You turn the page on an iPod, there's zero lag, you're reading instantly. One tap and you're there. And I think your 1/2 second estimate for a page turn is way out of line. I hold a physical book with the next page ready to flip, and flip it in a small fraction of a second. I think most serious readers do the same; otherwise, again, you're losing time and breaking rhythm. I'd estimate physical real-page turn time at about 50 ms, or a 20th of a second, max. Less for a paperback.

      If you have a device with a large screen, like a Kindle, you're not turning the page more than 2-3 times a minute.

      Ok. Kindle: .5 second for the text to come up; 3 pages a minute; 1.5 seconds; 1.5/60ths, or 2.5% of your reading time shot. A minute and a half per hour. iPod touch: Doesn't matter how fast you turn the page, because there's no delay. No reading time lost. Zero. touch is about 50 chars/line (in portrait... in landscape, it's about 75.) This is pretty much right where you want to be for maximum comprehension if you don't have to move your eyes. Consequently, page turning is perfectly reasonable; better yet, because the screen is small, there is little eye movement required and this also speeds up your reading if you are reading at a reasonable level (which I know you are because you say you can get through a book a day on vacation.) Finally, the contrast on the touch fonts is much higher than that on the Kindle; this makes a significant difference in readability. All these things lead to fewer breaks in concentration, less strain when reading (given that you have normal vision), and higher reading speeds.

      I'm happy you're happy with your Kindle; but as I say, we own both, and the Kindle is a pale shadow of the reader that the Kindle app on the iPod touch is. With both at hand, the choice for readability, storage, flexibility, convenience and comfort is easy: it's the iPod. And as I said initially, when there is a real tablet out there - not e-ink, and not just a reader - that'll be the end of the readers. e-ink is to LCD as McDonald's "eggs" are to a gourmet breakfast. LCD's offer glorious color, high contrast, high speed, high resolution, ability to read in any light, and when that LCD is on a general purpose tablet, functionality that exceeds that of a dedicated reader by an almost incomprehensible degree. Because the iPod touch is small, there will be many users that cannot deal with the small fonts, and for them, the Kindle and devices like it are the only fallback available. Tablets will eliminate that one failing, and that'll pretty much be the end of it unless e-ink comes a very long way forward.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:Not to mention: by joebok · · Score: 1

      I have had a Kindle for quite a while and recently got an iTouch - for other reasons than reading eBooks. But I tried out the Kindle app and - well, I almost exclusively use the iTouch now - for the reasons you specify.

      One thing in the Kindle's favor - battery life. With the modem off, I get a couple weeks worth of use out of it between charges. The usability of the iTouch is great - but I can drain it in a day.

      As far as contrast, however, I don't think that higher contrast always makes for better readability. You want enough, but not too much - I find the Kindle screen just about perfect. I usually have to dial down the brightness on the iTouch for reading.

      Anyway - if you can only have one, I'd favor the iTouch. But if you are a gadget hound (like me), why not get both?

  87. Steam-like store needed by ODiV · · Score: 1

    What we need is sellers like Steam, Gamers-Gate, and Good Old Games for the ebook market. Give me weekend deals, give me surprise specials on publishers, give me a discount if I buy an author's entire catalog. From what I've seen, there's little incentive to go ebook over dead-tree. They should be taking advantage of the low cost of distribution and selling as much as they can. If I can't get it for cheap online then I'm either going to pick it up used or from a library, I'm guessing neither of which profits them as much as if I get it directly.

    I don't mind Steam-like DRM. Make it easy to use and make sure it WORKS and people will love it. There are customers now who try to buy on Steam whenever possible, sometimes even when the same product available elsewhere with no DRM and at a lower price.

    That's not to say I wouldn't prefer something like RTF. Good Old Games is selling tonnes (how many bits are there in a gram?) of games DRM-free and are constantly adding to their catalog. There was nothing stopping me from pirating Fallout 2, but I bought it from GOG anyway because it was cheap enough to be a no-brainer. Older books, discounted, and DRM-free in a GOG-type store would be great and would make a lot of money.

    Unfortunately, ebooks are more likely to go towards the Microsoft XBOX Live store model. Sales are rare and often lame. Microsoft just added the ability to buy XBOX 360 games online. The main problem is, it's twice or three times as expensive as picking up a physical copy.

    1. Re:Steam-like store needed by metamatic · · Score: 1

      There are often special deals on Kindle books. Often publishers give away the first book in a series free, in the hope of getting you hooked. I've also picked up books for $1.99 or so.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Steam-like store needed by ODiV · · Score: 1

      Nice, thanks. Now we just something for Canada, I guess.

  88. The Alex by manekineko2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From a no name company, but this number that just got posted on Engadget seems incredible. Android, and apparently an open OS that runs ordinary Android apps.

    Same concept, but seems like more of a generalist device (and also much uglier). Can read not only ebooks, but can surf the web on the little LCD on the bottom, and then when a button is pressed, mirrors the content on the eye friendly e-ink display.

    http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/watch-spring-design-alex-push-the-web-to-e-reader-format-video/

  89. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that only the bottom portion was a touchscreen. One of the Kindle's biggest design issues is that taking notes or annotating passages is a PITA. In addition the silly thing "renumbers" pages when you change font size. The page numbers it DOES use have NO relation to the paper copy either.

    These are the things that make reading self-help books with others or using it in the classroom a failure. These things could be changed with a simple firmware update. Speaking of which - to my knowledge the firmware on my Kindle has NEVER been updated, I have NO idea what these "experimental" features are for if they never come out of "beta".

    The Kindle ain't perfect but the improvements that this new thing are touting simply don't knock my socks off. I'm happy to see competition of course but it's going to take many more features before I'll be switching. Kindle still rules this roost IMO.

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  90. USELESS IDIOTS!!! by Blymie · · Score: 1

    These clowns are, essentially, going to lose my business, forever.

    I've owned an Android device, since day one. There is not one single good ebook reader on the device. Not one.

    (hint: if you don't support raw HTML or TEXT, as well as your proprietary format, you're not a good ebook reader. You also shouldn't crash all the time, as well.).

    So, good old Barnes and Noble said a year ago, that they'd be releasing ebook reader software for android. Good news, I thought! Good to hear! After all, Amazon bought out Mobipocket, and instantly ended all releases of that software. There will most likely never be an Android release of Mobipocket, because it conflicts with Amazon's Kindle.

    Gee, good to see competition, eh?

    Now B&N decide to develop their own device. Well, la-de-da! Instead of releasing for the very OS their device is based upon, they hold back. Worse, they even use Android users as beta testers, but don't release the goods! Where is my ereader software for Android, you useless bastards? WHERE IS IT?!

    So, now we have Amazon, preventing generic ebook reader software for Mobipocket being developed, and now we have B&N doing the same, it would seem?!

    WTF?!

    These people are CLOWNS.

    1. Re:USELESS IDIOTS!!! by Blymie · · Score: 1

      I add, to highlight their clownliness, that the very site selling the Nook, has a download link for the PC, Mac, and Blackberry versions of their software.

      Meanwhile, the useless Nook is running an Android version of their eReader software, and I CAN NOT DOWNLOAD IT.

      WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE NORKS?

  91. Laissez Les Bon Temps Roulez by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    so ... imagine Beowulf of those ...

  92. Dual sceen, nice aesthetic, wasted space by BlueF · · Score: 1

    Dual screen design is pretty, but seems like wasted space. Granted, e-ink makes a poor interface for much more than basic device control, but I don't care for having so much wasted space on what should be 99% page. Not a fan of the Kindle design and it's keyboard for the same reason.

    Sticking with my Sony 505.

  93. Absolute Drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Among the advantages in the Nook's column: Wi-Fi, expandable memory via microSD, MP3 player, and PDF compatibility."

    I was an early adopter for the Kindle. I loved it from the beginning as it has WiFi, an SD Card slot, an MP3 player, and the ability to load PDF's on it.

    In short, this "story" loses. I am shocked this made the Slashdot front page; it reeks of Google fanboyism.

  94. Ignore the Nook, wait for Que by pietros · · Score: 1

    Ok, some facts. The technology behind this is from Plastic Logic. Plastic Logic got all out there and the drooling when it presented its first reader (which was not available for the public) more than 1 year ago. I have waited ever since to buy an ebook reader, knowing full well what I wanted: large screen, possibility to add my own pdf, e-ink. Essentially I think this product is a really bad. The screen is too small. It will fit novels, but if you aim to use it to read real A4 pdf you are in no luck. But Plastic Logic has now explained that it will come up with a new product: Que ( http://www.quereader.com/ ) for the business market. The press release says: "Extra thin, lightweight and wireless-enabled, QUE is the size of an 8.5 x 11 inch pad of paper, less than a 1/3 inch thick, and weighs less than many periodicals. The innovative QUE proReader features the largest touchscreen in the industry, an intuitive touch screen user interface, and provides access to a file cabinet’s worth of documents, plus your favorite—and most necessary—publications. " This is much more similar to the product they presented two years ago. This is what I will buy, not this silly nook-toy. I have waited 2 years, I can wait an extra month.

  95. Library books? by aaandre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will I be able to lend any book available at my library for free (tax dollars and all)? I woudn't mind DRM then.

  96. an eBook reader done right? by Eil · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to have an eBook reader. I'm one of those people who doesn't have the time to buy books from a bookstore or browse the library. I hate trying to find new creative places to store them in my home and don't want to deal with simply reselling them. I would love to read when I'm waiting in the doctor's office, winding down for the night, or driving to work but paperback books are just too inconvenient. The Kindle doesn't do it for me because the device has so much potential but is locked down with custom software and a "we control all your rightfully-purchased books" mentality. (Can't stand the keyboard, either.)

    I've been waiting for an eBook reader that's closer to a general computing device than any of the options out there now. The hardware is certainly capable, no doubt about that. You can do a surprising number of useful tasks on a low-framerate monochrome display, but none of the current readers even attempt anything beyond reading a book. You could download and listen to podcasts, do (limited) web surfing, play some simple games, manage your schedule, and so on.

    The LCD screen on the Nook already gives it an edge that other readers don't have, and I'm surprised that the price is as low as it is. If the Android app store is available as well, this could be a killer device. Let's hope B&N doesn't screw it up too badly.

  97. SDK (or at least an API for UI customization)? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    So... does it have a proper SDK (well, ok, at least unlocked hardware that can be freely reflashed with guerrilla builds of Android), or maybe an API for UI customization (repurposing buttons, changing the way it works, etc)?

    Up to now, there's one eBook market that should have publishers absolutely salivating: computer and technical books. It's the one niche where non-crippled eBooks really DO have a compelling value proposition. Think about it... what's the biggest single problem with most computer books? They're already a version behind 6 weeks before they even arrive at Amazon, let alone Borders or Barnes & Noble. Computer-related eBooks have the potential to change that, by letting you auto-update the books regularly to incorporate fixes and revisions long after the book first became available. Plus, they have the potential for instant gratification. I'd probably buy twice as many books if I could have them *right now*, *this instant*, instead of having to wait until at least tomorrow afternoon to get them from Amazon (I've pretty much given up entirely on Borders -- once the gold standard of local computer book availability -- and Barnes & Noble has maybe 3% of the books I actually want available for immediate purchase at a store within 50 miles of my house whenever I go searching).

    What I *really* want is an ebook that starts with the button configuration of an Ectaco Jetbook ( http://tinyurl.com/ctaq3q ) that keeps the transflective LCD, but bumps the resolution up to 1280x960 or 1600x1200, has approximately the width and height of a Manning book, and adds a capacitive digitizer for finger-friendly Graffiti-like handwriting recognition. And of course, a published, programmer-friendly API that lets you more or less reinvent its user interface without having to actually reinvent Acrobat reader *itself*.

    Why LCD instead of e-ink? Latency. Novels are usually read page by page, sequentially. Computer books are ready by jumping all over the place, and rapidly flipping through pages to find something nearby. Frankly, 500-800ms is just plain unacceptable in that context. It would drive me nuts. I want to hit the 'next page' or 'previous page' button, and have the page visible before I even finish releasing the button (using onboard ram to cache the entire active pdf file since flash is painfully slow). Hell, if it becomes affordable, give me a second display while you're at it, so I can either see adjacent pages, or have two books open at once side by side. Maybe make one display e-ink, and one LCD (with a UI that juggles them around, so the page of interest during active page-flipping always ends up on the LCD instead of e-ink).

    Would I pay $40-50 for an ebook that costs the same in print form, that can only be read on a Kindle, and is basically a warmed-over scan of the print edition? Hell no. At best, current ebooks are basically a crutch to get me over today's crisis until the paper copy arrives tomorrow. Half the time, my workflow can be described as: 1) find book(s) at Amazon; 2) order before the FedEx deadline; 3) download it 20 minutes later from eMule, since I *really* need it *right now* (admittedly, skipping step #2 most of the time if it's already past the evening deadline for next-day delivery and too late to get the real book by tomorrow anyway. It's amazing how not being able to get it tomorrow under any circumstances has a way of diminishing the perceived urgency of buying it). Yeah, I DO get my money's worth from my Amazon Prime membership. The FedEx man personally knows my name ;-)

    Would I do it for a book on something rapidly-changing, like Android programming, with constant revisions for at least 2 or 3 years as Android evolves from 1.5 to 1.6, 2.0, and beyond? Hell yeah. In fact, even limited to reading it on my PC, I paid the author of the Busy Coder Android books for a 12-month subscription that gives me permanent pdf copies of his Android books (3 so far), plus constant revisions. Google 'warescripti

  98. Re:An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, to by semiotec · · Score: 1

    I suspect if Apple comes out with some sort of e-ink device you'd be singing a different tune

  99. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Kindle locations bear no relation to page numbers, but they are not dependent on text size. Just tried it on my K1.

  100. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My kindle (K2) has been updated a few times already. See http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200324680 for more details. Also, it is hitting about 6 months since the release, so I would expect a big one soon.

  101. Seriously? No web browser? by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I don't care if it has a vibrating codpiece with an attachment to automatically clean up the mess after the happy ending, if a reading device doesn't have a web browser, I'm not interested.

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    1. Re:Seriously? No web browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would want to use a reader for the web. Maybe stuff types that like to read the news, or look up things on wikipedia.

  102. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that with TWO Kindle side by side using different fonts the "page numbers" did NOT match up. This with a pair of K1. I and a woman I was seeing were both trying to read a self help book and when we would try to compare notes we found it impossible because we would both end up in different parts of the book. I read at smallest font, she read closer to largest.

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  103. Re:An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, to by rbasomb · · Score: 1

    I ve read a lot of books (maybe 50 per year in the last two years) on an ancient Palm TX with a great reading software called PalmFiction. I love it. I carry it everywhere and since i bought it i really enjoy commuting, having to sit in waiting rooms, etc. The display is great, it has one of the best screen to overall size ratio, it has a reasonable battery life and with PFiction i can read in green over black with a very decent font. TX is great with txt, docs, rtfs, but i reckon it sucks big time with PDFs. But i heard that Palm is no longer manufacturing the TX, and honestly i dont see any succesor in the market should i ever lose or break my TX. The samsung q1 was a step in the right direction, but was expensive. Maybe the Ipod Touch fills the screen size and price criteria, but does it have a reading software designed for the hardcore ebook reader like the Palm has??

  104. Kindle DX = PDF w/o scrolling by c4t3y3 · · Score: 1

    If there is no automatic reflow of text to fit the screen you need a device able to show the whole page. Kindle DX does that, Nook doesn't.

  105. Supported formats by sirdude · · Score: 1

    Is there a comparison page which outlines the supported formats for the Kindle, Sony (Libre?), Nookie (sic) etc.? .txt, .rtf, .lit, .pdf? Whatever happened to .lit? The $259+ tag is obviously not subsidised. The e-books are not subsidised either at $9.99. So, these guys are trying to have their cake and eat it too?

  106. Re:An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, to by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

    But it's so small!!! I can't get absorbed in what I'm reading.

  107. The Chinese Hanlin reader? by sirdude · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does anybody have and use the Hanlin reader? Review? I'm not sure, but this might also be available in rebranded form. Looks like DRM-free heaven to me.
  108. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    Metric shit-ton? Hak5 FTW!

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  109. Re:An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, to by joh · · Score: 1

    Since I strongly suspect that Apple would do this only if and when e-ink has gotten much better (at least much faster), this is not totally impossible... I'm not a fanboi, though.

  110. Re:An iPod touch is the better reader. Cheaper, to by joh · · Score: 1

    Try Stanza, it's even free. There's also Kindle.app from Amazon, iSilo, eReader and several others.

  111. Two problems for me. by Plainview · · Score: 1

    Two problems for me: 1. No web browser (can be fixed later, after all it is running android so in the field of hackability looks promising). 2. Not available to international customers.

  112. But can it... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    But can it read DRM-free ebooks, other than PDFs? (TXT, RTF, HTML especially) I have hundreds of DRM-Free books that I've bought from Baen.com and I'm always looking for a better reader. For years I've used various PDAs with varying levels of success. If this does the job well, I'd be happy to pay that price.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  113. Refresh rate too slow for command-line interface? by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't matter if it was too slow when scrolling, but I think typing could be the issue. If there's a significant delay between hitting a key and the letter appearing, it would be awkward to use.

    Though I'm seeing a far bit of delay on this web form right now, and I'm coping with it...

  114. Seems stupid to have a seperate device by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    If I already have an iphone, or itouch, or netbook, or whatever; why should I also have to carry around a separate device just to read text?

  115. Vender locked by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I have a Kindle. Can I move any of my Kindle books to the Nook, if I buy one? Or, if Nook users decide Kindle is better, can THEY move?

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  116. Durability by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    Durability - Both are ruined by water, but I can bang a paper book around pretty good and it's still readable. Even if I totally destroy a paper book, I'm only out the few dollars it cost me for that book [I buy most books used].

    All of your points are good, but if DRM does not interfere, e-books actually win in this category. If your books are files, you can back them up on multiple media in multiple locations. Your physical book will wear out eventually, but your files don't have to.

  117. Odd price structure by hymie · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what B&N is doing with their prices. I'm one of their members (pay $25 a year to get 10% off purchases, and an additional 5% off when using their credit card). They're not giving the 10% discount for digital objects, including eBooks, which means that as a mass-market paperback buyer, I would have to pay more for my eBooks than for my paper ones, and it makes my membership useless. Look, for example, at the novel Low Red Moon. B&N's member price for the paperback is $7.19 and the non-discounted price for the eBook is $7.99. Amazon, on the other hand, prices the paperback at $7.99 and the Kindle version at $6.39. So B&N is screwing the people that they have enlisted through their loyalty program. It makes no sense.

  118. best post ever... by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.

    Posted upon release of the first iPod.

  119. Re:Okay, so I own an older Kindle, here's my POV.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the "multiple ways" that you've successfully converted PDFs? I've tried converting using Amazon's service, Stanza, Calibre, and the Windows Mobipocket thing, and the conversion process was extremely weak for pretty much everything except for documents which are essentially plain text.

    Forget about reading academic papers or for example, previously purchased O'Reilly PDFs.

    If you have any other suggestions, I'd be thrilled to hear, because strong PDF support is what I'm missing most on my Kindle.

  120. Did they catch him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't RTFA or the summary, and I don't know what all this talk about books is about, but there's a killer on the loose. I want to know if I need to keep my tazer under my pillow or if they caught the bastard.

  121. odd name? it's genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nook is perfect. makes you think comfy-chair

  122. Online Sale BLaze & Air Yeezy Shoes For Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Http://www.tntshoes.com

    Our products are of good quality but reasonable price. And the price depends on the quantity. The more order, the better price.
    AS a professional exporting company dealing with sandals etc. We have wide and good business relations with many factories here. OUR COMPANY accept small trial orders, even drop shipping business is welcome here. We have good business relations with express company here, and we have got the stocks here in our house ware, so we can ship the shoes immediately once we got the confirmation from you. Kindly let us know your interest and we will send you photo samples and quotations for you to study.

    OUR WEBSITE:
                                                                Http://www.tntshoes.com

                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

  123. Hmm Indeed - Display is Poorly Designed by Nocuous · · Score: 1

    The specs actually look pretty good, including expandable memory with cards, replaceable battery, wi-fi in addition to dedicated high speed wireless.

    But that stupid screen design is a killer. I have the Kindle 2 and Kindle DX (disclaimer). The color display at the bottom of the Nook is cute and all, but I couldn't read with that distraction. I didn't see; can you turn it off? I'm pretty sure you can't expand the reading area to reuse that space, so at best it's a blank spot at the bottom of the screen, at worst, a fatal distraction.

    Nice try, no cigar. I'm curious to see how Amazon counters this. No matter what, I LOVE this competition; within a few years I'll be using a much better reader than anything on the market now, reading DRM-free books. And no, I don't care if it's Amazon's or some other reader. Worst case, I'll crack the DRM of any books from Amazon and take them with me to the new reader.

    --
    Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
  124. Supplier ED Hardy Jacket,ARMANI Jeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Http://www.tntshoes.com

    1) Made of superior quality upper materials
    2) Double customs clearance for container customers
    3) Unique design and various colors and models available
    4) Sizes available
    5) Available in stock for prompt shipment
    6) Fast delivery: 3 business days
    7)fast and safety delibery by EMS, DHL, FEDEX, and so on We sell brand shoes,clothing,bags,hats,belts,watch,sunglasses,mobile phone, and so on.For the detailed informations, please go through our products website.
    Please do not hesitate to contact us to know more.
    Contact name: jury

    OUR WEBSITE:
                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

  125. Tasp Button by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    Hello, Mouse. Here's a device where you push the button and get a fix of the dope you're hooked on. Of course, every hit will put $10 on your credit card . .

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."