Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Border Police Shoot US Student's Laptop

zerothink writes "American student Lily Sussman, 21, upon entry into Israel from Taba (Egypt, Sinai) caught Israeli border police in grumpy mood — after two hours of questions and searching through her belongings they decided to put three bullets through her laptop. Explanation? 'I'm sorry but we had to blow up your laptop.' Haaretz also covered the story." All three bullets missed the hard disk.

128 of 929 comments (clear)

  1. Conveniently forgetting the details by assemblerex · · Score: 4, Informative

    She had the following on herself -hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem -Arabic stickers on laptop -"Fuck Star of David" pic on phone
    -passport stamps from Arab countries -various Arab publications -photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

    1. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Soooo... they nerdraged her puter?
      Seems a little odd they would attack her puter. Feels more like they were little babies because they didnt agree with her on some subjects so they hurt the only thing they could. School playground antics from grown ups, awesome.

    2. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Jojoba86 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was no moaning in TFA about the questioning, just the 3 bullets in the laptop. There's no reasonable explanation to why they might do this that I can think of, but it makes for some awesome pictures.

    3. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they had to shoot down her laptop. With three bullets. Missing her hard drive. That really makes sense now.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by assemblerex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Standard OP for possible explosive device is most countries it to shoot it to prevent it from exploding. Usually a shotgun is used. It does not have enough force to detonate the device.

    5. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      She had the following on herself -hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem -Arabic stickers on laptop -"Fuck Star of David" pic on phone

        -passport stamps from Arab countries -various Arab publications -photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

      It is not convenient at all forgetting the details you mentioned. They change nothing about the story. The only thing that can justify such an action is if her laptop battery was made by sony.

      Now that's a threat.

    6. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course. Everyone knows that terrorists will do everything they can to draw attention to themselves while setting up a plot.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by VShael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She had the following on herself -hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem -Arabic stickers on laptop -"Fuck Star of David" pic on phone
      -passport stamps from Arab countries -various Arab publications -photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

      Unless her name was Ms. McGyver, I don't see how posession of any of these items is a threat to anyone or anything.
      And unless there was a good reason to shoot the laptop, these folks were simply acting like dicks with too much power and too much paranoia. (A common complaint amongst guards the world over, mind, not just Israel.)

      If you can't tell the legitimate threats, from the bullshit ones, then you're going to fuck up your job sooner or later.

      And in their case, a fuck up means people could die.

    8. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Selfdeclared? There WAS resolution of UN which allowed its creation. Most countries recognize Israel, even if they dont recognise Jerusalem as its capital.
      How about "selfdeclared" state of US? Or "selfdeclared" state of Syria? Or "selfdeclared" state of Spain? Or Iran ... or all other states of world?

    9. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by unbug · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. I'm constantly amazed at how people carrying Arab publications act all surprised when their laptops get shot.

    10. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Half of those are covered by her living in Egypt, half of them by her being a journalist. Either of those in isolation or combination strike you as a bomb threat?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given the other evidence they probably determined there was a statistically significant percentage that the laptop wasn't just a laptop, so they disposed of it how almost every group disables potential bombs, by shooting it.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    12. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by hashax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She had the following on herself -hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem

      Geography students in Israel better start wearing kevlar soon.

      -Arabic stickers on laptop -

      If you're one of the 530 million people speaking Arabic, here's some news - knowing a language could be a crime.

      "Fuck Star of David" pic on phone

      I'm not one for nasty language, but I won't go popping bullets in things I don't like, Mr Columbine.

      -passport stamps from Arab countries -

      What's wrong with visiting an arab country? or do you believe in enclosing a race to their own land and prevent them from outside contact? Similar logic to that of a certain country, I must say.

      various Arab publications

      That sounds plain xenophobic. Education is not synonymous to English or Hebrew.

      -photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

      You should start getting trigger-happy with the U.N., Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and a dozen other human rights monitoring agenices and governemtns, because they condemned military action in Gaza. I should not have to leave my opinion at the border when entering a country, if my opinion is not causing any harm to anyone.

    13. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by meerling · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it were a chemical or biological agent, that would release it into the air.
      Was the agent wearing a proper hazard suit and mask?

      Second, shotguns won't set off plastic explosives. Neither will a high powered rifle.
      But if a shotgun pellet hit a blasting cap it will definitely explode the whole thing.
      From what I hear, terrorist improvised explosive devices tend to be made with more unstable stuff (blasting caps) rather than more stable things (c4).
      By the way, forget everything you've ever seen in a movie about explosives, it's total B.S.
      Also, all the E.O.D. guys I know of doing a 'disposal' will either move it to a 'safe' location or at least sandbag the snot out of it before dealing with it.
      (You know those new bomb robots that have the built in gun? It's for shooting at the control mechanism, not the explosives, and if you don't know where both those parts are, you don't shoot at it unless you want to buy a new robot. Last E.O.D. robot I played with cost $2.5 million. Nobody wants that coming out of their paychecks.)

      Yes, I know what I'm talking about when it comes to those substances, I really was a Munitions Systems Specialist in the military.
      (Job kinda sucked, so did the co-workers, but it had it's good points.)

      Either way you look at it, they pumped 3 rounds into just to be pricks and F with the girl.

    14. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're military grunts, not PC repair men. Tell me, from looking at the case behind the LCD of a laptop, can you tell me where the hard drive is located?

      Do you know what the symbol for "Arm" is on the firing control mechanism for an M1 Abrahms main gun? I'm guessing they have a better idea than you, but then again you have a better idea of which symbol means "hard disk" on a computer case.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    15. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by grimsnaggle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So she didn't have access to a printer and isn't fond of the Israeli government's behavior towards the Palestinians. Neither of those make her computer a serious threat to security nor justify the behavior of guards. They were clearly acting out of malice. It's precisely this kind of behavior that breeds discontent with a government both at home and abroad.

      What governments need to realize is that it's important to take the high ground. They must act logically, thoughtfully, consistently, honestly, and fairly regardless of the immediate consequences of doing the right thing. Doing otherwise may seem profitable in the short term, but will only create discontent in the long term.

      All of that said, it would have been easy for this girl to have avoided all of this if she had been interested in doing so. She must have known that her items would catch the attention of the guards, or she must have been an idiot.

      I suppose all I've proven here is that guards are unthinking thugs (ask any American Slashdotters of their opinion of the TSA) and that there are attention-whores with travel plans. Nothing to see here...

    16. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      very true and the parent is very wrong. but it was created with very different borders than today

      http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/israel-palestine_map.jpg

      and that was using merkava "treaties".

    17. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Informative

      self-declared state of Israel

      Actually, they were declared a state in 1947 by the UN.

      But hey, sometimes facts just arn't as fun are they?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    18. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by furball · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean like these guys? As part of their preparation, they made a video. Then they take said video to Circuit City to have it converted to DVD.

    19. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think she trolled them and they used their enormous discretionary powers to teach her a lesson.

      A more sinister view of it is that someone sent her through with (from her blog)

      Security had never asked for my password. Was it my peeling Arabic stickers on the keyboard? Or something else during the questioning which set them off?

      Toward the beginning of the search an officer began clicking through the photos on my camera. She froze on a picture of graffiti, which read “Fuck” scrawled next to the Jewish star of David. “Why do you have this picture?” She asked me rather aggressively. “Because I was disturbed by it too,” I answered. She didn’t press the subject but continued clickingpresumably looking at pictures from a photo exhibit about Israel’s January attack of Gaza.

      The security guards then asserted their AUTHORITAH by shooting the laptop. Now their will be an outcry. The terrorists can now send someone who looks and acts like her with a bomb on the offchance that the outcry will cause the government to damp down the security response. Fat chance of that working though.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    20. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you know what the symbol for "Arm" is on the firing control mechanism for an M1 Abrahms main gun?

      Wait... you mean the design of the main US battletank supposes that the operators can't read english? Or is this from some israeli knockoff of the Abrams?

      Yeah, the Israel version is called the Abrahams.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      By the way, forget everything you've ever seen in a movie about explosives, it's total B.S.

      So I shouldn't cut the red wire?

      OK, green it &# :"}$%._. ...no carrier

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy to spot the difference, the gun is slightly shorter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by billius · · Score: 4, Informative
      Conveniently taking said details out of context:

      hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem

      Could either be suspicious or not depending on what said map entails. Given that according to the blog it was just the main streets in town, I don't really find it that suspicious at all, though I realize we're only getting one side of the story.

      Arabic stickers on laptop

      The Arabic stickers were on the keyboard, which, along with the Arabic phrasebook, would seem to indicate that she was learning the language. I don't know about you, but my guess would be that most people planning to collaborate with Palestinian terrorists would be at least fluent enough in said language not need a phrase book. It's not as if she has a bunch of Arabic stickers denouncing Israel stuck to her computer.

      "Fuck Star of David" pic

      As per TFA:

      a picture of graffiti, which read “Fuck” scrawled next to the Jewish star of David

      It's not like she had some fancy logo from an Anti-Israel website saved as her background or whatever. She saw some graffiti and took a picture of it, that's it.

      passport stamps from Arab countries

      So legally entering and exiting these countries makes her dangerous?

      various Arab publications

      What the hell does this even refer to? All she mentions is an Arabic Phrasebook. You're making it sound like she's reading a signed copy Osama Bin Laden's authorized biography when all she wants to know how to do is order food and ask where the bathroom is.

      photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

      From TFA:

      pictures from a photo exhibit about Israel’s January attack of Gaza

      You're assuming that the photos were condemning the military action. There's no mention of whether or not they were for, against or simply neutral on the subject.

      The bottom line is, the only way shooting the laptop makes any sense is if they believed that there was some kind of explosive hidden within it that needed to be safely discharged away from people and given the context, even that sounds like bullshit given that they saw the computer working. Data pertaining to terrorist attacks, etc, could simply be erased. They could have just impounded the hard drive or laptop if they found something about the information suspicious. No matter how I slice it in my head, I can't figure out why on earth they shot a fucking computer except that 1. it might be really fucking fun or 2. they were hardcore MS fanboys.

    24. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Loki_1929 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You quite obviously have the luxury of living in a place where completely random things suddenly exploding isn't a regular occurrence. The border agents in Israel do not have that luxury.

      When Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and all the other local terrorist groups stop stuffing bombs into everything they possibly can in order to blow up buses and nightclubs full of civilians, Israeli border patrol agents can stop testing suspected bomb containers by shooting them as a matter of policy. Until then, if it were my life and the lives of my friends and neighbors on the line, I'd be plugging holes in anything being carried across the border that I thought could even possibly contain a bomb if I had even the slightest thought that something wasn't right.

      This snooty little cunt knew exactly what she was doing and she went there with every intention of stirring up trouble. What she didn't count on was the fact that - unlike where she's from - the government in Israel takes all potential threats seriously because they've been taught to do so by decades of cleverly hidden bombs blowing up their citizens at random. And the reason they questioned her for two hours is because they've learned from vast amounts of experience what to ask and when to figure out what someone's really up to.

      She was packed to the brim with anti-Israel crap and had maps and directions to a public bus station and a hostel in the heart of Israel. She couldn't have looked more like a foreigner coming to do harm if she'd written "TERRORIST" on her forehead in red lipstick. So they decided her laptop could be a bomb and destroyed it the simplest way they could; by shooting it. And after all that? They gave her the info so she could be compensated for the damage done to her property. That's right; they're paying for the damage because it turns out she wasn't a terrorist carrying a bomb; just a snooty cunt carrying a big chip on her shoulder and a lot of attitude.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    25. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by gladish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently you've never served in the military. Most people are in their early to mid twenties. Hardly "grown ups".

    26. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by sturle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evidence!? What evidence? Photos, a hand drawn map and stickers making it possible to write in arabic? The latter is evicence for normal use of the laptop. Certainly not bomb markings. WTF?

    27. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bottom line is, the only way shooting the laptop makes any sense is if they believed that there was some kind of explosive hidden within it that needed to be safely discharged away from people and given the context, even that sounds like bullshit given that they saw the computer working.

      It makes more sense to me that they felt she was anti-Israeli and abused their powers to teach her a 'lesson'. I don't know how you can only draw the conclusion it could be only some truly legitimate reason.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    28. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by nidarus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Either way you look at it, they pumped 3 rounds into just to be pricks and F with the girl.

      Not true. I don't know why or how it works, but as an Israeli, I can tell you that it's standard procedure - they clear the area and bring in a robot that shoots the suspicious object.

      Maybe they're actively trying to blow up the object ($2.5M is nothing in this regard, btw - do you have any idea how much the army spends with a much smaller ROI?), and maybe they've been fucking with the whole Israeli population for ~30 years, but it has nothing to do with this particular girl.

    29. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They didn't clear the area, and there's no reason to believe they brought in a robot, given that they shot it in earshot of the rest of the travellers. If they did think it was a bomb, they were obviously keen to do as much damage with it as possible.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    30. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would that be the same UN that Israel has been ignoring for the past 20 years or more, for example security council resolution 452.

    31. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Informative

      self-declared state of Israel

      Actually, they were declared a state in 1947 by the UN.

      But hey, sometimes facts just arn't as fun are they?

      After a long terror campaign by various Zionist groups - hey it may work for Palestinians too.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    32. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by sharkman67 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wish I had mod points right now. Finally a dead on post. This girl needs to understand the rest of the world is not like the US and her rights don't extend outside it's boarders. She's just lucky she didn't pull this BS in some third world country otherwise she may have just disappeared.

    33. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by sturle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope. Israel was proclaimed an idependent state by Israel May 14th 1948. Most of what Israel calls Israel is occupied territory. Some Israeli claim the country was given to them by God, which implies they believe in The UN as their god. But God (the UN) only gave them a part of Palestine. The rest is self declared and not recognized as Israel by the rest of the world. In fact Israel have no official map of where their borders are. IMHO Israel should get their behinds out of the parts God (the UN) promised the Palestinians ASAP, and I believe such a move would make the area a lot more peaceful.

    34. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're sorry miss, but that is a Macbook. Therefore it is horrible and must be destroyed before our children see it and make an arbitrary decision about the proper O.S. and hardware. You might get away with using that in a Muslim land, but here it is not kosher.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    35. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by lewko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congratulations. You know fuck all about EOD and bomb disposal, but were so busy with your little tirade, you didn't bother doing the most basic research before trying to bignote yourself.

      It took me 10 seconds to find this video of a bomb disposal robot firing a shotgun into a suspicious package in downtown Tel Aviv.

      That's about half as long as it would have taken you to write your clueless little rant about fascism and other irrelevant nonsense.

      "Please give me a single reference where in any modern world (modern being after XV century) police or military forces protocol, says that you should soot [sic] an object suspect of harboring explosive charges !"

      Fail.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    36. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Loki_1929 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Congratuations! If you actually do shoot a bomb, you'll probably kill yourself and do a significant amount of damage to your surroundings. If you shoot a chemical or biological or radiation agent, you've just dispersed it.

      Perhaps you should do a tad bit of research on bomb disposal methods prior to commenting further on the topic. Clearing the area, then firing shots into the suspected device is entirely common and appropriate procedure for securing such a device. We're not talking about nuclear ordinance here. The kinds of bombs that will fit in these kinds of packages having been assembled out of spare parts and pieces in somebody's kitchen will create a sufficient explosion to do significant damage only within a small, confined area. Sometimes various shrapnel is added to increase lethality. None of them will do much in wide open space.

      Probably most of the visitors to Israel carry directions to their public transport and the place they're staying. She cooperated fully with their questioning, to the extent that they were happy to leave her sitting out on the balcony enjoying views of the Red Sea while they dealt with her belongings. What makes her a terrorist suspect is the material she had on her, entirely consistent with her being a journalist travelling from a Middle Eastern country documenting the hate against Israel. Apparently living in one of Israel's neighbours, and showing an interest in the Israel-Palestine conflict, is reason enough to think you're a bomber. That's scary.

      First of all, she's not a journalist travelling from a Middle Eastern country documenting the hate against Israel, she's an American displaying hate against Israel with her own personal belongings. Add to that the travel to several Middle Eastern countries and a device which (when x-ray'd) looks a heck of a lot like a bomb (battery cells, etc) and you have all the grounds necessary in a place like Israel to declare the thing a suspected bomb and destroy it. News flash: when you cross a nation's border, said nation has every right to detain you for as long as they wish, question you about anything they wish, destroy anything of your's that they wish, with or without reason. In this case, we've got a country constantly under seige by randomly exploding things in public places whose agents spotted an individual displaying a serious hate for the country and what could (in the world of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc) be a hiding place for yet another clever bomb.

      All-in-all, if I were an Israeli citizen, I'd much rather have these guys standing between terrorist groups and my family than you. You're looking for reasons not to inconvenience people entering the country. They're looking for potential threats and dealing with them best they can.

      Your attitude would directly increase the chances of more people being blown up in bus bombings.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    37. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Israel was proclaimed an idependent state by Israel May 14th 1948.

      The United States was proclaimed an independent state by the United States on July 4, 1776. Does that mean we don't exist, either?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    38. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by lewko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly how was her speech restricted?

      Which prison is she currently rotting in?

      Which members of her family have gone into hiding?

      How long was she tortured for?

      Oh, wait. I'm thinking of what happens to dissidents in Arab countries. In Israel, you get an apology and a cheque for a replacement laptop. Do tell us more, about how eeeeevil the Jewish state is. Your objectivity is remarkable!

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    39. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      -passport stamps from Arab countries -

      What's wrong with visiting an arab country? or do you believe in enclosing a race to their own land and prevent them from outside contact? Similar logic to that of a certain country, I must say.

      From the FCO website (just as an example): "You require a visa for Syria. Whether or not you have a visa you should be aware that if your passport contains an Israeli stamp or stamps from other countries' border crossing points with Israel, you will be refused entry to Syria."

      Similarly, it's not recommended to visit the USA if your passport has a stamp from Cuba. Cuba know this though, so they usually won't stamp foreign passports.

      I should not have to leave my opinion at the border when entering a country, if my opinion is not causing any harm to anyone.

      That's funny, because when I went last visited your country I had to tick a box saying I wasn't a communist.

    40. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by jbssm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, no doubt Israel has the right to exist ... inside the borders stated in the 1947 UN resolution, not in the way it exists now, illegally occupying practically 2x more territories from it's neighboring countries by the use of force !

    41. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      She had the following on herself -hand drawn map of downtown Jerusalem

      She is Jewish after all (even if she's not religious apparently, that's not a crime). If she's going to Israel, then it sort of makes sense for her to have a map.

      -Arabic stickers on laptop

      You mean? The stamp/sticker of an Arabic/Gypsy woman with rather large bosoms in a red shirt??? Is that the sticker you're speaking of? In Afghanistan too, the Taliban would probably have shot her laptop as well for having such a disgraceful sticker on there.

      -"Fuck Star of David" pic on phone

      You make it sound like this was the main background picture on her phone, when in fact it was just one picture out of hundreds that the guard was flipping through (that she claims she took because she was as shocked by this "art" graffiti as they were). My Jewish roommate in College would certainly have done the same, he was big on documenting hate crimes and anything related to anti-Israeli sentiments.

      -passport stamps from Arab countries -various Arab publications

      She lives in Egypt (suspicious, yes, but should they shoot the laptop of every Jewish person that lives in the region but not in Israel?? I would hope not.)

      -photos condemning Israeli military action in Gaza

      Again, this was part of that same Art/Photo exhibit against the Gaza incursion, so I'm not sure why you're listing it separately from the picture of the Graffiti insulting the star of David. And again, my former roommate (a self-proclaimed Zionist) would have been documenting and taken pictures of all those photos himself.

      Personally, I don't think there is any evidence that she might be anti-Israel, although I certainly wasn't there -- so without hearing the other side of the story -- I can't say things one way or another. But this is problematic, anti-Israel or not, it's important to have due process either way, otherwise you're giving way too much power to those young border guards (who may not know what the hell they're doing).

    42. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Akatosh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having been there, Isreal isn't even remotely 'western-civilized'. An American should seriously fear for their life there unless they know the ins and outs of that culture. God forbid you slip up and accidentally order a pepperoni pizza (my mother was ousted from the building) or stand in front of a muslim en route to prayer (my brother was picked up and thrown headfirst into a barrel of fish). A tour included a popular shootout spot, complete with bullet holes on either side of the alley. The airport we left from was bombed the day after we left. That place is NOT 'western-civilized', or anything civilized, or even safe.

    43. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by nidarus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aah, that map again. The one where "Palestinian land" can mean "the part of Mandatorial Palestine (a British-colony-type entity, that included all of that area) that the author decided was more "Palestinian" than the rest", "a plan that was accepted by the Jews, but rejected by the Arabs", "parts of Jordan and Egypt" or "the first time the Palestinians had any kind of autonomy, ever".

      I won't try to deconstruct that moronic attempt at propaganda piece-by-piece - I'll just note that each step after 1947 could have been avoided if the Arabs accepted Israel's existence, instead of trying to take the whole territory by force.

      The Merkava tank, btw, was first used in 1982.

    44. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Xest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, Egypt and many of it's citizens have fairly good relations with Israel because they realise Hamas, an offshoot of the Islamic Brotherhood is Egypt's biggest terrorist threat. This is why Egypt is happy to help Israel keep up the Palestinian blockade on their border, and why most of Egypt's citizens aren't too fussed about that either.

      "Fuck Star of David" picture isn't something that's covered by either of these and yes it would strike me as a concern as a person responsible for security in a country that is under constant threat of attack from people with such an attitude towards them. But then, you can't take these things in isolation, because that doesn't give a full picture.

      It's like finding someone with a binary explosive, and having the components confiscated and them saying that's not fair, would you consider either of the components a threat in isolation? Sure they are harmless by themselves, but that doesn't mean they're not suspicious and dangerous when being carried together, breaking down to the individual parts doesn't tell the full story.

    45. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by nidarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More like by winning wars that said Arab neighbors started in order to annihilate Israel.

    46. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are many faults about Israel, but these things are not typical of Israel the way I know it. Maybe the old city of Jerusalem? dunno.
      First of all, I don't remember any bombing of any airport in Israel. There was a terrorist attack 35 years ago in Ben Gurion Airport. I'm sure you are not talking about that.
      And the other two incidents - really weird. Pepperoni Pizza is very big there from what I recall.
      Tel Aviv and its surroundings are very western-civilized. Jerusalem and the west bank are just plain fucked up in every aspect imaginable, I'll give you that.
      Israelis consider these two areas to be almost completely different states. At least two completely different states of mind.

    47. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then again, mere blocks from The Capitol building in Washington D.C. there are whole neighborhoods that routinely go on lock-down where you have to present ID before entering and murders are reported weekly.

      I'm not sure what part of Israel you were visiting, but your account sounds pretty suspicious. I've never tried to order a peperoni pizza there, but you can get a cheeseburger almost anywhere since most Israelis are secular (even though there is a large observant population). I also didn't seen any fish barrels on my visit, but I suggest that your brother not visit any Walmarts on the day after Thanksgiving lest he get trampled.

      I'm not sure what your idea of "western-civilized" is, but Israel is a place like many others. There is an unfortunate level of violence in some areas but on the whole it is as safe as most US cities. If you act with disregard to local customs and expectations, you may not receive a warm welcome.

      Anecdotal comments without context shouldn't cause concern for anyone considering a trip to a beautiful and historically significant place.

    48. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, they are. She mentioned them in her blog entry.

      my peeling Arabic stickers on the keyboard
      a picture of graffiti, which read “Fuck” scrawled next to the Jewish star of David
      pictures from a photo exhibit about Israel’s January attack of Gaza
      an Arabic phrasebook
      a journal entry that mentioned a Palestinian
      stamps from Syria, Qatar and the UAE
      Palestinians in Palestine guidebook
      a map a friend had drawn with a main street in Jerusalem, the central bus station and my intended hostel

      Furthermore, in her follow-up blog entry, she starts off with:

      First, I completely agree with Freitas’s comment. “These guys shoot every day at unarmed people, even children. Why so much surprise about a simple laptop?”

      If that is the sort of attitude she exhibited toward the border guards, combined with the stuff they found in her possession... added up, it was suspicious.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    49. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by zoney_ie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can say the same about Northern Ireland, and indeed there are various parts of even Western Europe where certain seemingly ordinary behaviour can get you in a lot of trouble (like being in a particular place that unbeknownest to you is a "bad area" - like one block away from a busy ordinary central area). Parts of England are grim and like something out of Dickens, supposedly civilised Germany still has problems with trogodytes who will lynch certain categories of people or liberals who cling to concepts of people being equal. Here in Ireland most of the country gets drunk often - and the emergency rooms fill every night with the results. Like England, there is the problem of a roaming "underclass" who might take offense to you happening to look at them.

      As for the US, the police there shoot people. Criminals are executed. People have guns for "safety". Being ill can pretty much being destitute too. Certainly being mentally ill or poor can mean being homeless. OK a gross simplification, but from a European country the US seems like the Wild West (or worse in some social respects). As regards ordinary people, I would suspect it isn't healthy in certain places in the US to be obviously Muslim, or the wrong skin colour, or even certain European countries like France. Being very Irish or very Italian probably causes issues in certain places too.

      Basically the world isn't civilised, and "the West" although probably more civilised than many parts of the world, is still not entirely civilised either, and differs in its definition of it.

      Israel is pretty civilised in general for a "trouble spot".

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    50. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by VJ42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Parent shouldn't be marked troll, he's correct. Whilst the British mandate was still in effect over what was then Palestine, Zionist groups conducted what would today be described as a terrorist campaign against them culminating in the Bombing of the King David hotel. As the parent said, the tactics worked to help establish the Israeli state, it may eventually work for the Palestinians as well.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    51. Re:Conveniently forgetting the details by lennier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "she's an American displaying hate against Israel with her own personal belongings"

      Political protest is hate now? I must have missed the memo.

      I certainly missed the memo when I was out protesting the Iraq War in February 2003. Didn't realise I was actually arguing *for* bombing people by opposing the dropping of bombs.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  2. Unfortunate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But this is what happens if you don't set up partitions properly.

  3. Backup! by Jojoba86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What.all my client case notes and testimony, writing, pictures, music and applications. Years of work. NO!!!! What?? Are you insane?? What were you thinking? THAT’S ALL MY WORK!?

    What? There are a million and one things that could happen to a nice shiny laptop while travelling, if your data is that important it's pretty stupid not to backup, especially before travelling.

    1. Re:Backup! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? There are a million and one things that could happen to a nice shiny laptop while travelling, if your data is that important it's pretty stupid not to backup, especially before travelling.

      I work while traveling so backing up before embarking on a lengthy trip is of limited value. If you are on the road you have three options for backup: You can use an external HD which you have to carry with you and while traveling and which these paranoid guards would have put another three bullets through so although that's a valid option it's no good in a situation like this. Also keep in mind that your backup HD stands a good chance of getting stolen right along with the rest of your luggage. The second option is cloud storage which can't be easy to access when you are on the road in war-torn palestine even if you have a GSM connector. It's a quite expensive option to use if you do manage to get a connection and if your data goes over a few megabytes (let's say you're a photographer) it's a totally impractical. You could also store your stuff on a flash drive or memory cards which is better than an external HD since you'd be likely to carry that in your pocket which makes it less likely to get lost when your luggage is misplaced or stolen. Of course that's assuming those paranoid Israeli border guards don't confiscate your flash storage devices and... oops... accidentally drop them under the tracks of a passing Merkava.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Backup! by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do any slashdotters still have the recording of the customers voicemail regarding the lost data on his hard disk? I think it was to Compaq or maybe even Canon (?) it'd be over 10 years old and they replaced his hard disk without telling him and he went proper, proper insane in this voicemail.
      I haven't heard it in years, I do recall the line along the lines of "last 4 years of my goddamn fucking life" or something.

    3. Re:Backup! by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Use snail-mail to send SD cards to yourself. Works like a charm.

  4. Very thoughtful of them by A12m0v · · Score: 4, Informative

    She will be reimbursed on her shot MacBook.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  5. Hyper-security in Israel by dushkin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nothing new to me. It even beats American airport security paranoia, I hear.

    Here's an outline of the security measures at the train station near my home (minor suburban station with about a train an hour):

    Before I enter the station, I see guard dogs, handled by security officers (in their 20s). They're actually a bit cute. Except they have sharp teeth and they're trained to kill etc.

    I have to take my bags and put them through an X-ray machine, examined by a clueless security officer. I also have to step through a metal detector in case I have a gun/knife on me (never gets triggered by my belt and house keys)

    Then as the train arrives, commuters are instructed not to board it until "security examinations" are finished (even if it's the back-and-forth shuttle train that only has two stops).

    All train personnal are armed with a pistol. Including drivers. ... And then a 20 year old soldier walks in carrying an M16 and ammo which he is somehow allowed to because he has a slip of paper and uniform.

    Security at its finest!

    --
    o hai
    1. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by furball · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Security at its finest!

      I'll play! When was the last time someone managed to bomb or hijack a plane originating out of Israel? Now how about the US? UK? India? Germany? France? Spin the globe. Pick a random country.

      Bonus trivia question: How many aircrafts have been hijacked originating from an Israeli airport in the entire history of Israel?

    2. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by furball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't paranoia if they're out to get you.

    3. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see guard dogs, handled by security officers (in their 20s). They're actually a bit cute. Except they have sharp teeth and they're trained to kill etc.

      Are those cute, trained to kill, and sharp teethed officers in their 20s, single?

    4. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by dushkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I totally get you, but a lot of people prefer it that way because they're simply freightened.

      I'm not saying right or wrong here, but both sides have sound reasons.

      --
      o hai
    5. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      No idea honestly, but that Entebbe incident from the 70s (I think it was) comes to mind, and it originated in TLV (or SDV?). Possibly with a stop in ATH, but my memory's a bit cloudy.

      Well it was an Air France flight, and the hijack happened in Athens. So it wasn't necessarily a case of Israeli security failing - it's more likely the guns were brought on board in Athens.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Entebbe#Hijack

      On 27 June 1976, Air France Flight 139, an Airbus A300, originating from Tel Aviv, Israel, carrying 248 passengers and a crew of 12, took off from Athens, heading for Paris. Soon after the 12:30 p.m. takeoff, the flight was hijacked by two Palestinians from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP-EO) and two Germans from the German Revolutionary Cells—Wilfried Böse and Brigitte Kuhlmann. The hijack was led by Böse who diverted the flight to Benghazi, Libya

      Incidentally the Germans - though claiming to be left wing ("radical left anti-imperialist liberation doctrine mixed with strong anti-Zionist, anti-patriarchal feminist, and anti-racist elements. ") - had a nasty antisemitic streak

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Cells_(RZ)#History

      During the operation, which was carried out in conjunction with the PFLP, the German hijackers separated Jews from non-Jews, detaining only the former. The hijacking, which most observers reported initially as another Palestinian operation against Israeli targets, thus became emblematic of the perceived ideological proximity – at its extremist fringes – of the radical left, particularly in Germany, and fascist doctrine.

      In many ways I've always suspected that the ideological spectrum is actually a circle - the far left and far right are actually much more similar to each other than they are to democratic parties. Of course both the far left and far right need to deny this as vociferously as possible because the existence of the far right justifies the far left and vice versa. The textbook example is Germany in the 30's where people scared of the Communists saw the Nazis as the only way to stop them. Similarly people scared of Fascism saw the Communists as the only viable resistance. Of course both the Communists and the Nazis planned to sweep away liberal democracy and replace it with something much nastier.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Hyper-security in Israel by furby076 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I'm criticizing here is the irony of X-ray machines and metal detectors, only to allow soldiers that the employees don't know in

      You are going to x-ray someone who is blatently carrying a weapon to see if they are carrying a weapon....

      For the record, I'm actually not a muslim nor am I Palestinian. I'm one of those average secular/Jewish caucasian Israelis.

      When it's one of your family members who is blown up, because he happend to be eating at a restaurant in downtown Nethanya, then you may decide to re-evaluate your views.

      Not in person. I'm going off on a tangent here, but speaking of airports... I happen to work in the airfreight business and I know for a fact that our clients have constant run-ins with airport security for absolutely no good reason.

      We're talking major exporters whose cargo is held for days. Terminal security doesn't care about how urgent your shipment is or how some hospital in Europe really needs this certain piece of medical equipment.

      Major exporters can ship illegal (be it bombs or black market CDs). They can do it knowingly and unknowingly. As a person in the freigh industry you should realize this. To label it "hospital" to bypass security would be an invitation for every criminal to label their goods as "hospital". If you want to bypass security, at least in the US, you can get special permission and any large/reputable company should easily be able to get it.
      As a person who flies on a regular basis, and who is engaged to someone who flies on a VERY regular basis, I can tell you every single run in I had with airport security was time consuming and came away with nothing - well because I am not breaking the law. I at no point was every upset with those security details. It's called random searches, and sometimes profiling (which I have no problem with).

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  6. well duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    who wouldnt want to put three bullets through a Mac?

    1. Re:well duh! by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Standard internets shots fired
      pew pew pew!

  7. Had simply read the instructions by sciencewatcher · · Score: 3, Informative

    Safety and security procedures in Israel are strict, but effective and generally well applied. Terrorists often send 'innocent' foreigners with equipment across the border to test procedures. They now know what does not work. As far as the woman involved concerned, just reading the leaflets with info available at all embassies and airlines would have prevented her laptop in need of replacement.

  8. Am I wrong... by Huzzah! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or would the value of this on Ebay be rather high? Higher than a working model.

    1. Re:Am I wrong... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      RARE Collectible IDF SHOT MacBook Pro *** Limited Edition *** (Reserve Not Met)

  9. it's like the middle ages by darkeye · · Score: 5, Insightful

    armed thugs stop the travellers on a regular basis, and demand all sorts of things from them, at gun point. like removing clothing, penetration of clothing (tap search inside pants), stealing items like water bottles and knifes, or destroying property as here. in worst cases they can even enslave you (called arrest and inprisonment now, or rendition)

    this is not much different from the middle ages, where bandits would stop travellers, and demand all sorts of things from them at the threat of physical violence. at least, at that time one could prepare and fight back.

  10. Mobility problem! by zolf13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly, the iMac was not mobile enough comparing to the bullets.

  11. It is obvious she is biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Based on her current and past posts it is obvious she is anti-israeli. Israel like any country has the right to protect its borders and the security of the state with all means. Trying to harm border guards is not something unheard of there is even a video of a successful attempt running on youtube (www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPyAMSh_yLo) Israel is known to have strict protocols when dealing with suspicious objects (Which includes laptops or any other unattended bags left in any area). I have seen this in action more than once. I.e baggage left accidentally at the bus station will probably get blown up by a bombsquad in a matter of minutes since it has been reported (after the area has been cleared). It's the same in every border in the world. Even laughing about a bomb will get you arrested in most places and probably deported. Don't forget she had arab stickers on her laptop, a picture of a star of david defaced, she has beenliving in Egypt (While it has peaceful relationships with israel , egypt is known to be home for many terrorist cells). The fact is that the laptop was suspicious and got blown up to eliminate a possible threat. Based on Israeli officials she will be reimbursed for the laptop - Hey look on the bright side - she could buy a new MacBook Air

    1. Re:It is obvious she is biased by t0p · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some countries, you know you have to be careful what you say, what literature or pictures you carry, etc, because you know the local police will arrest/deport/torture/kill critics of their regime. Such countries are usually dictatorships where no one has expectations of rights and freedom. Israel isn't supposed to be one of those countries. Israel portrays itself as a democracy, where concepts like freedom of speech are respected. If someone who disagrees with the current government's policies wants to visit a free democracy, she should be afforded the courtesy of toleration. Interrogating such a visitor for 2 hours is not very courteous. Shooting her laptop is extremely discourteous. The reason for this treatment: because she disagrees with the policies of a democratic country's policies, and presumably has sympathies with Arab Israelis (ie Israeli citizens) as well as Palestinians. There's nothing in this story to indicate that the border guards actually suspected her of being a terrorist. They didn't like her, and wanted to "teach her a lesson". So she's been/going to be recompensed for the laptop - so what? She's still gone through the trauma of its destruction and the inconvenience of being deprived of it during her travels. The guards responsible for shooting the laptop won't be punished - they were "just doing their job". It's just sad that in a so-called democracy, the duties of a border guard include traumatizing tourists who disagree with a government's policies.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    2. Re:It is obvious she is biased by martinbogo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lets see .. you're a terrorist, and you want to get a bomb into place. So:

      o) you make yourself as conspicuous as possible
      o) ... put antisemitic stuff all over your baggage
      o) ... post TONS of antisemitic stuff on the internet just to be sure
      o) ... enter Israel from a country known to harbor terrorists

      Get my drift? It's that very kind of behavior at a border crossing that makes her the least likely candidate to be carrying explosives. Also, most explosives have a residue signature that can be easily scanned for in Israel because they keep that kind of tech handy at customs points. A few swipes with a swab and a portable scanner later .. you know -exactly- what's in the bag. Five minutes or less. I can't say if shooting her bag was an over-reaction, but I can say that at least at that facility -- they had options.

      At the end of the day, it's a wash. She is getting reimbursed for the laptop, and the Israeli security forces look good inside of Israel, but look silly to the outside world. Nobody really wins.

      --
      "Don't worry about the problems you have in mathematics, I assure you mine are much greater." - Einstein c.1919
  12. If it had been a Thinkpad... by mirix · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bullets would have bounced off. But it does figure that angsty types would have an apple product.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  13. Priorities by SkunkPussy · · Score: 5, Funny

    On other news websites, "Thankfully, noone was killed". On Slashdot, "All three bullets missed the hard disc".

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:Priorities by easyTree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know - thankfully Slashdot readers have our priorities in order!

  14. Its not an easy place to cross by JenniP · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've crossed into Israel at this particular border point, around 5 years ago, and yes it was one of the hardest border crossings I've ever done, we were part of a tourist party who were going to be in Israel for around 30 minutes (a quick drive through Elat then out into Jordan), and its not somewhere I would take anything bigger than a camera I would even if I could empty the card before I went through. Everything was Xrayed, the metal detectors were so sensitive every scrap of metal was detected, a few people having to remove jeans with quite a few studs, your personal property was swabbed and checked for explosives and then once through there you were grilled about your personal details at passport control, quite a few people getting long grillings. All under the watch of guys with automatic weapons. It wasn't a place you made any kind of joke, you do exactly as you are told. At the time I though it was overkill then a week later this happened http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Sinai_bombings, a terrorist attack aimed at the Israelis pretty much at that border point (although on the Egyptian side), kind of puts it all into perspective. Saying that since that border crossing, I am a lot more careful what I take with me, laptops and cameras fully backed up, and only take essentials, even bought a travel laptop so my main machine would stay safe at home. Everything electrical packed into one easy to search bag. Jen

    1. Re:Its not an easy place to cross by t0p · · Score: 3, Informative

      So the border guards interrogate this woman for 2 hours, X-ray her laptop, see her laptop working, and still decide to shoot it... and that's okay because a terrorist detonated a bomb in Egypt? I'm not trying to play down the horror of terrorist bombings. I'm just saying that security concerns do not justify harrassing innocent tourists just because you don't like the look of her.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    2. Re:Its not an easy place to cross by ido50 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because anyone with a brain bigger than the size of a peanut knows Israel has a little more to offer than borders with Arab countries. In my 25 years of life in this "hellish desert" I've never once been to one of the borders, never once (knock-on-wood) found myself in or near a scene of terrorism, and probably once or twice visited our Judah desert, which is about as big as DreamHost's data center. Yes, we have life here. It's probably not as easy or glamorous as yours, but yet again no one get's to choose where to be born.

    3. Re:Its not an easy place to cross by lewko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the weapons at Ben Gurion airport are concealed, worn by very attractive officers as it happens. Sexy and deadly.

      I saw plenty more German Shepherds and machine guns on display at Heathrow and Frankfurt airports, where the security was nowhere near as good when it all comes down to it. All show and no go.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  15. Stupid bitch by soundguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have to be pretty goddamn stupid to fly into a fanatical military state like Israel from a Muslim country with a laptop covered in Arabic stickers. What's the next leg of her journey? From Israel to Iran wearing a star of David and demanding a kosher meal?

    --
    Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    1. Re:Stupid bitch by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good point, Israel and Iran are both fanatical countries....

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    2. Re:Stupid bitch by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it wrong for an American to expect better treatment in Israel than in Iran?

      Of course not. Which is why she GOT better treatment. Try flying into Iran with a "fuck mohammed" photo and hebrew stickers on your laptop. As a best case scenario you'll lose the laptop without compensation. Worst case, you won't be posting on slashdot for a long, long time.

    3. Re:Stupid bitch by kalirion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the other hand, is it right for an American to expect better treatment in Israel than in America?

  16. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would it be possible to design a bomb that goes off when shot?

    Sure. Just carry a jar of nitroglycerine. The trick with that one is, rather, not to have it go off because you looked at it wrong.

  17. If I may nitpick by Sun · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was shot by Israeli Police, not the IDF.

    Shachar

  18. Re:Probably better for her than old TSA policy by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 4, Informative

    What Al Queda stickers? What political statements?

    Her blog only said Arabic stickers. AFAIK, the language is not (nor is speaking it or appreciating it) against any laws.

  19. Not sure what the fuss is about by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Admittedly, it does not sound as if shooting the laptop (and the display, of all things) was necessary, or even helpful. Having said that, the Israeli procedure seem to be:

    Our procedures are strict, but we try to apply them fairly. They HAVE saved life before. We do get it wrong occasionally, and then your property may get hurt. When it does, we apologize and reimburse you

    Contrast and compare that with the US customs, which says:

    Our procedures are arbitrary, and we do not commit to any specific policy. Most people go by unmolested, but if we do decide to molest you, there is nothing you can do about. Deal with it. If we took away your possessions, you will never see them again

    Even on sheer "friendliness", I'm not sure which I prefer.

    Shachar

  20. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Griim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason they're shooting it is to *try* to make it go off.

    Typically this would be put in a bomb pit somewhere nearby. From reading the comments this is fairly common practice there. This one nailed it pretty well:

    "I know many Jewish Israeli people who had their bag shot just because they left it unwatched for a couple of minutes. Yes, this is the unfortunate reality that Israelis live in, where Palestinian terrorist would do anything (such as put bombs cowardly hidden in laptops) to intentionally hurt innocent civilians. These are precaution measures intended to prevent loss of innocent lives (yes, sometimes at the cost of a cherished laptop because of a possibly careless border officer)."

  21. Re:Probably better for her than old TSA policy by Ash+Vince · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given the political statements on her laptop, one wonders what kind of provocation she might have tried with the guards. I don't believe that justifies their reaction, and wouldn't be surprised if they are disciplined (which will, of course, generate zero coverage outside of Israel), but most rational people understand that baiting Israelis is a rather dangerous sport.

    Damn right, this is the country that has been said to have a policy of shooting unarmed civilians by one of its own army snipers.

    "Sergeant Wahid Taysir, the sniper who killed Hurndall, has already said a policy of shooting at unarmed civilians existed at the time."

    Full Article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jan/30/israel

    Ok, the guy in question may have been saying this just to save his own skin as he was on trial for murder, but the large number of people, including children, killed in Gaza last year does make you wonder if maybe he was telling the truth.

    --
    I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  22. Let's say it was Iran by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And she entered with her nice little laptop 'puter with the star of David on it and some stickers about how Allah was a faggot and the Iranian president a ninny. I wonder what would have happened? I wonder when Americans are going to wise up to the fact that in some countries they don't have the sense of humor about criticism that we do here. That it can be dangerous to travel abroad with a smug sense of superiority and invulnerability.

    1. Re:Let's say it was Iran by PjotrP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      your point being that Israel and Iran are comparable in how they handle criticism?

      --
      PjotrP
  23. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I know many Jewish Israeli people who had their bag shot just because they left it unwatched for a couple of minutes. Yes, this is the unfortunate reality that Israelis live in"

    Not to belittle their situation, but anyone who's travelled much at all on public transport in London will be aware that they must not leave their belongings unattended "or they may be removed and possibly destroyed by the security services".

    I'm not aware that it's happened to anyone I know, but the threat is there. Of course, we lived with a couple of decades of terrorist attacks ourselves long before Terrorism was the new bogeyman.

  24. Re:Disposing of bombs by shooting them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, that doesn't play. If you really thought the laptop was a bomb you wouldn't give it back avec ou sans bullet generated ventilation holes.

    And bombs aren't shot to disable them. Good grief: the result is totally unpredictable. Would it trigger: maybe, maybe not. Would shooting disable a bomb: maybe maybe not. Certainly, the laptop with holes would be a conversation piece with security at the next border crossing no matter where that was ;-)

    The only reason to shoot it was to intimidate and to display arbitrary power.

    Was that the right thing to do? Maybe: I don't live there and I haven't seen the things that a border security person has.

    Seems to me that if they were suspicious of her it would be more prudent to seize the laptop and to either turn her away or to put her on a watch list.

    I think the guards were pissed at her and meted out some self satisfying punishment.

  25. Re:her blog has 2 posts by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Informative

    This http://www.calcalist.co.il/internet/articles/0,7340,L-3319543,00.html
    Translated should give some idea
    http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=34520
    "... paid Internet talkbackers are being mobilized in the service in the service of the State. The Foreign Ministry is in the process of setting up a team of students and demobilized soldiers who will work around the clock writing pro-Israeli responses on Internet websites all over the world, and on services like Facebook, Twitter and Youtube..." ...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  26. Re:Also forgets Jews may criticize Israeli actions by Kyrene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She's not Jewish. She even says herself: "They quizzed me on Judaism, which I know nothing about" Read the Ha'Aretz article.

    --
    Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
  27. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Bertie · · Score: 4, Funny

    A few months back I accidentally left a bag on the Tube. All it had in it was some incredibly sweaty gym kit - I'd just done 90 minutes of Bikram Yoga. I realised what I'd done on the way home and was terrified that I'd carelessly brought the whole London public transport system to a halt, but thankfully it looks like they didn't call in the bomb squad.

    If the London Underground staff member who cautiously opened that bag, fearful of it blowing up, only to find my soaking clothes in it, is reading this, I apologise unreservedly for the appalling sight that must have greeted you.

  28. Stupid Slashdotter by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Arabic is one of Israel's two official languages. Why is it stupid to have Arabic stickers on your laptop? Because you're an ignoramus, would be my guess.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  29. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether the Israeli military used white phosphorous when targeting civilians (the evidence suggests they were using it the way everyone else does, as flares at night to light up targets so the wrong building/person isn't shot) is irrelevant. As is the question of whether an errant bomb/missile hit a school in a war zone (mistakes happen and collateral damage is tragic, but it's not like it's done on purpose). The question is, have the Israelis have lived with random bombings in civilian areas long enough to justify extreme security measures with regards to unattended bags and suspicious cases crossing the border? I think the answer to that question is "Yes".

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  30. Re:Nothing of value was lost by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you mean? Those bullets are single use only...

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  31. Cluelessness all around by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we take the blog post at face value, everyone involved behaved rather stupidly. Both the border police (for shooting up the laptop), and the student (for not having a backup copy of her "years of work"). Meh.

  32. You can't win... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are two possible kinds of answer to the question "How many aircrafts have been hijacked originating from an Israeli airport in the entire history of Israel?", but no matter what the answer is, it will always support this insane paranoia:
    • None => see, this paranoid security is efficient! Israël is right with being so locked-down, it has protected them from great harm!
    • This obscure incident in Entebbe, and maybe a couple of others => see, they really are out to get Israël. So it's not paranoia, but justified fear
    1. Re:You can't win... by furball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The incident in Entebbe was not hijacked out of Israel. It was an Israeli plane (El Al). The hijackers boarded in Athens.

      There has only been one incident of hijacking from an Israeli airport in the history of Israel. That occurred in 1968. Justified fear or unjustified fear, their airport security works. The goal of airport security: prevent bombings and hijackings. Have they succeeded? Based on lack of bombings or hijackings since 1968, yes. Is it because of airport security or because no one in the world wants to bomb or hijack an Israeli plane packed full of Jews?

  33. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I defy her, you or anyone to start mouthing off at an Egyptian or Iranian airport and see where you end up. It won't be in a queue filling out paperwork.

    That's good. Israel should use that as a tourist tag line "Israel: we're at least as rational as Egypt and Iran". Makes me want to visit.

    Look, just because another government is more oppressive doesn't make their actions any less ridiculous.

  34. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by bluewolfcub · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So which part do you disagree with? You don't feel that it's unfortunate? Or you don't believe it is reality?

    I disagree with the emotive language implying that Palestinians are the only ones killing innocent civilians. Particularly given differences in death counts e.g. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/14/gaza-city-fighiting-israel-un or the lack of running water for so many people

    More than 400,000 Gazans were left without running water, while 4,000 homes were destroyed or badly damaged, leaving tens of thousands of people homeless; 80 government buildings were hit.[30]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_War or the ongoing dispute about construction of wells/water buildings + farming which Israel are preventing them from building (there are further links about the below, especially relating to actual construction and needs, and differences in water consumption, but no time to look them up at this moment)

    According to reports, Israeli soldiers shoot towards farmers working on their lands along the buffer zone nearly every week...During Operation "Cast Lead" which ended in January 2009, private houses, workshops, cattle farms, tree groves, agricultural roads, water wells and rain-fed crop fields located within the area were demolished by the Israeli army.

    So "unfortunate reality" that the poor israelis might have some bags and laptops shot given all the above, well yes, it does make me question if they have a sense of reality. Or perspective.

    To respond to another post:-

    Ohhh, I JUST love the "my side has it worse" game!

    I'm not on anybody's side, except maybe the "let's not be hypocrites about this" side.

  35. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would it be possible to design a bombWould it be possible to design a bomb that goes off when shot? That way, you-the-bomber get around the most popular technique for defusing rather easily... that goes off when shot? That way, you-the-bomber get around the most popular technique for defusing rather easily...

    You do realize that that's the whole point, right ? Opening the bomb and attempting analysis is what's risky. By putting it in a safe place (against a wall and no roof over it) and then shooting it, you can make it explode safely, without hurting anyone.

    The object of defusing a bomb stopped being actually defusing the bomb a long time ago. These days the object of defusing a bomb is to detonate it at a time and place of your choosing, instead of the time and place of the bomber's choosing, as just about every security force in the world has lost too many body parts and lives to defusing attempts.

  36. You don't know anything about this by nidarus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Over 300 comments, most of them about how the girl deserved it because she had some Arabic stickers, or how the Israeli police is stupid and evil.

    But the truth is: you don't know. You have no idea what happened there, what made the police suspect the girl, what she actually said to them, what they found in her luggage, or, hell, even if she was a terrorist, you'd have no way of knowing it.

    All you've got is a short news article, and a short blog post, both very light on details. Even the girl doesn't know why the police blew up her laptop. The reporter knows even less. And you, the average slashdotter, know jack shit.

    Seriously, people, get a grip.

  37. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I disagree with the emotive language implying that Palestinians are the only ones killing innocent civilians.

    It's a story about a fucking laptop, you twit. If there was ever a comment more deserving of an "off topic" mod, I haven't seen it.

  38. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whether the Israeli military used white phosphorous when targeting civilians (the evidence suggests they were using it the way everyone else does, as flares at night to light up targets so the wrong building/person isn't shot) is irrelevant.

    Considering they mostly used it at daytime, it surely isn't.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  39. Oh my God! A U.S citizens laptop was hit! by wmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OMG! Laptop of a U.S citizens was hit! ah, someone talked about Palestinians being hit by bombs and bullets. Forget it! Did the US owner of the Laptop became unhappy?!

  40. Re:Assholes or morons by amosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because these are ISRAELI border guards. If they wanted to destroy a laptop that included sensitive information, they're smart enough to know to shoot the hard drive. See the million posts above on why the guards would have shot a potential bomb in this way.

  41. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Informative

    You do realize that hamas, you know, lies. In addition to destroying their own people just for the attempt to kill a few Jews ?

    But really : how much of what you read is propaganda, and how much of it is true ? Not that we don't all (including you) know that already, but hey, someone's got to ask the question.

    Here are 2 pictures of a Gazan farm, built by Jews, that was given to Hamas :
    before it was given to hamas
    1 year later

    (that's a weapons smuggling tunnel)

    How can you tolerate a country that has "we will kill all jews world-wide" in it's constitution (note they do clarify that if they ever get the Jews they will come after everyone else - you just can't make this up. Unfortunately, it's not a joke)

    And btw, yes Hamas stole the election. Unfortunately, they would have won even if they hadn't stolen it according to polls. This existence is what Gazan muslims want, over 60% of them. Of course, the fact that anyone who has anything better to do in his life than killing Jews has long since left is the main cause of that.

  42. The police were wrong! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

    The correct procedure, when coming in contact with a Mac, is to shoot it at least 5 times.

  43. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by jonadab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Of course, we lived with a couple of decades of terrorist
    > attacks ourselves long before Terrorism was the new bogeyman.

    The UK only *thinks* they have terrorism problems. (The US too, for that matter.)

    Spend a few months living in Israel, and you'll find out how it really is.

    I'm not saying shooting the laptop was necessarily justified or the right thing to do. I don't know enough of the details of the situation to say that. But I will say that there are some security measures that Israel absolutely *has* to take, that would be viewed as unacceptably harsh in places with relatively low levels of terrorist violence. Israel really has very little choice in the matter. They're basically living in a war zone, all the time.

    Did I mention that the entire middle-east is officially not on my "places to be sure to visit" list? Call me a wuss if you want, but I prefer to live in an area where the word "terrorist" generally calls to mind news stories from several years ago and several hours' drive away. Small-town USA is good. Our town doesn't make the news much, and we *like* it that way.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  44. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I disagree with the emotive language implying that Palestinians are the only ones killing innocent civilians. Particularly given differences in death counts or the lack of running water for so many people"

    The problem with this type of argument is it completely ignores intention.

    You see, the issue is this, Israel, with it's military might, could kill far more than the death counts it does if it wanted to. Hamas, because they are constrained and only have highly inaccurate rockets can't. Israel does at least, contrary to popular belief try and hit militants not civilians, but the problem they face is two fold, firstly a militant with his AK-47 taken away is easily classed as a civilian, because they do not wear uniforms, and secondly, militants hide amongst the civilian population. I wont pretend there aren't some dickheads in the Israeli army who do attack civilians, and I wont pretend the Israeli military try and cover it up when it does happen. What is pretty clear though is that the Israeli military doesn't have a policy of intentionally killing as many civilians as possible, else they'd just napalm the shit out of downtown Gaza and get far higher casualty numbers in contrast.

    Now on the other side of it, you have Hamas, Hamas do want to inflict civilian casualties on Israel, in fact, that's their goal, but fortunately they don't have the means to do so very successfully.

    So the raw numbers are often used unfairly to demonise Israel, because you see, Israel's kill count is much lower than it could be if Israel wanted it higher, but it's also much lower than the civilian kill count Hamas would like to inflict on Israel. It becomes even more of an issue when you realise that Hamas using civilian cover is the whole reason many Palestinian civilians die in the first place- effectively Hamas put them in the line of fire by launching rockets from civilian errors- in this respect Israel has to decide whether they just take the fire and receive casualties themselves, or try and stop the fire and risk Palestinian civilian casualties, but also take out the militants too. Hamas then also must bear some responsibility for the Palestinian civilian casualties themselves.

    Again, just to make it clear, I far from believe the Israelis are saints, but I do realise it's not a simple problem for them, and it does seem clear they don't for the majority part intentionally kill civilians. They do a lot wrong, but they're playing a far less dirty game than Hamas, and by falling for their game of using civilians as cover as you are, you're just encouraging them to do it because the propaganda they get from it due to people like yourself looking only at the figures, not the facts, or the fact they can't be shot at but can shoot and kill Israelis freely if they aren't stopped makes the situation win-win. Do the Palestinian civilians a favour and recognise the problem of Palestinian civilian deaths for what it is- a problem that both Hamas AND Israel are responsible for rather than falling for the Hamas propaganda and hence giving them ever more reason to continue to put Palestinian civilian lives in danger by keeping it a win-win situation for Hamas.

  45. Probably Confusion, not Malice by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Feels more like they were little babies because they didnt agree with her on some subjects so they hurt the only thing they could. School playground antics from grown ups, awesome.

    More likely that the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.

    Fact 1: If you show up at an Israeli border crossing with a bunch of Arab stuff, you are going to be subjected to extra questioning.
    Fact 2: If you leave a bag unattended in Israel, it will be assumed to be a bomb (for obvious reasons), and will be destroyed.

    I'm guessing that when the guard saw all her Arab stuff, they told her to leave her bag and go get questioned. Then another guard saw an unattended bag and called the bomb squad, who destroyed it.

    It sounds from the article like Israel is reimbursing Sussman for her loss, and I feel that's appropriate. They shouldn't have shot up her laptop.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  46. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Israel was created by a UN mandate. Had her neighbors peacefully accepted this mandate nobody would have been forced out of their homes. The original borders were largely drawn along the lines of where the Jews and Palestinians were already settled. Instead of accepting this mandate however her neighbors attempted to settle the matter with military force. Not once mind you, not twice, but three different times.

    You can't really place all of the blame for the current situation on Israel, much as though you may want to. There's plenty of blame to go around on all sides.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  47. And the Palestinians are not under siege? by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your attitude would directly increase the chances of more people being blown up in bus bombings.

    And the attitude that any person who dislikes Israel should be treated like a criminal and denied basic rights does far more damage than any misguided kid's political views.

    There isn't much difference between Israelis complaining about Palestinian violence and early pioneers complaining about Native American violence. If you take someone's land and property with force, they will probably do whatever they can to retaliate. If you don't want them to use terrorist tactics, have the US give the same amount of weapons to Palestine as it does to Israel. I'm sure the two state solution would suddenly be vastly more appealing to the hardliners who still want to steal Palestinian land under the guise of security.

  48. Two anecdotes by oren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First - My work place was on the 3rd floor overlooking a main post office. I remember a case where someone left his groceries when he picked up his mail from his mailbox. About 20m later, we saw the guy sprinting back a few blocks down the street. However, the bomb disposal people were at ground level... and their robot shot his bag before he could get close enough for them to see him. Veggies everywhere. So no, this isn't picking up on someone in particular. Leave a bag unattended in a sensitive public place, and this may happen to you - regardless of who and what you are.

    Second - I am sure this girl had a most unpleasant time. She is overlooking the fact that she wasn't a suspect as such. If you were a terrorist trying to smuggle a bomb into a high security area, a good way would be to plant it on some young, sympathetic, naive, idealistic western girl who is "obviously" not a terrorist - a profile this girl fit to a T. To rule this out you need to ask a lot of invasive, personal, seemingly irrelevant questions. If this sounds far fetched to you, read about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nezar_Hindawi who planted a bomb in his pregnant Irish fiance's bag. I am certain she went through a most unpleasant time as well. I am also certain she appreciated keeping her and her baby's lives. I am also certain all the other passengers on her flight appreciated continuing living, too. And the crew. And all their families. And friends.

    The bottom line is that security in Israel is different from the USA. Instead of inflicting ineffective, mindless, low-level nuisance on everyone, it focuses on people who may (knowingly or unknowingly) pose a risk and gives them a thoroughly unpleasant, but effective, screening. This method works. And for most people, Israeli security is a much more pleasant experience than going through USA security. Of course, for the few who end up getting the 3rd degree, it is much worse.

  49. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't believe Palestine in any incarnation was party to the UN mandate. Did they have any voice at all in the UN?

    It was *decided* that portions would be carved up and given to the Jewish people who had settled there. But the disaffected parties weren't given any say in the matter; just 'accept this'.

    Little wonder they didn't care for it much...

    I completely agree blame is well spread in this case. That was my original point, it takes 2 parties. Or as others commented, just one to start the problem, which was the UN/Israel who started it.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  50. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Palestine" was part of the Ottoman empire. Not a discrete legal entity.

  51. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Informative

    The British.

    Nope, the British were adamant that Jewish mass emigration to Palestine shouldn't happen because it would end in violence between Palestinians and Jews. As a result, Jewish terrorists frequently attached the British authorities in Palestine. When an exhausted Britain pulled out of Palestine, having been bankrupted by World War II, the Jewish terrorists became militias that massacred and expelled Palestinians. These groups then went on to declare the existence of the state of Israel.

    Saddest of all, is that the state of Israel enshrines the extermination of Jews in World War II as its right to exist. This is despite the fact that it was founded on racially motivated genocide against Palestinians, is increasingly dominated by reactionary religious groups, and was founded by groups who were largely hostile to the European Jews who had suffered in World War II (they were held to have brought it on themselves by not emigrating to Palestine earlier).

  52. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Palestine" was part of the Ottoman empire. Not a discrete legal entity.

    So that justifies massacres and expulsions? This is the same pro-Israel disinformation that claims Palestinians are just Jordanians/Syrians/Lebanese (choose as per your particular prejudice), and therefore not worth a damn. This is despite them having a longstanding cultural identity that is different to their neighbours.

  53. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Informative? Troll.

    How can you tolerate a country that has "we will kill all jews world-wide" in it's constitution (note they do clarify that if they ever get the Jews they will come after everyone else - you just can't make this up. Unfortunately, it's not a joke)

    In the words of Wikipedia, citation please.

    Is it before or after Article 4, which states:

    Islam is the official religion in Palestine. Respect and sanctity of all other heavenly religions shall be maintained.

    Or Article 18?

    Freedom of belief and the performance of religious rituals are guaranteed, provided that they do not violate public order or public morals.

    Here's an idea, it's novel, I know. How about you go to the Palestinian Constitution, which I helpfully linked above, and show us this "not a joke" claim you're making, "it's true, really it is" about the goal of "death to Jews and all non-Muslims".

    Because beyond that, you ARE a troll.

  54. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by ryanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trouble is, most Jews I run into that speak out (apparently, like yourself) can't separate hatred of Jews from disagreement with retarded Israeli behaviors. I can think Israel is full of shit without hating the country or the people it. But, apparently, a ton of Jews can't figure that out and attempt to discredit people that disagree with them as anti-Semites. Frankly, pathetic.

    PS: sometimes, as with the US, there is a reason why people can't stand your country.

  55. Re:Shooting bombs? No bombs trigger when shot? by wwahammy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. I guess it didn't legally apply until 1949 so while territory occupied prior to that may not be relevant to the debate, the territory occupied from the 1967 war is very much relevant.