Slashdot Mirror


Heavy Internet Use Linked To Depression

An anonymous reader writes "People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression, British scientists said on Wednesday. These 'internet addicts' spent proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and online communities, Morrison said. They also had a higher incidence of moderate to severe depression than normal users."

360 comments

  1. Such a sad story. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sad, so sad.

    Oh, wait.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nooooo! So funny! Hahahahaha!

    2. Re:Such a sad story. by Amphetam1ne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait... how did we get on to Seasonal Affective Disorder?

      --
      I only buy pepper spray that's been tested on anti-vivisectionists.
    3. Re:Such a sad story. by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And what's cause and what's effect?

      What if heavy internet usage is caused by being depressed rather than causing it?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Such a sad story. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      Or social anxiety disorder?

      --
      SSC
    5. Re:Such a sad story. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Judging from my own experiences as someone who has suffered from depression for roughly half of my life (and someone who has attempted to end it), I would have to say that depression is the cause, and heavy internet use is the symptom. It's an escape mechanism. Instead of constantly thinking of death, you can get on the Web and try to distract yourself.

      --
      SSC
    6. Re:Such a sad story. by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I could only manage to read about half the story before I was so overcome with dispair that I... I can't even finish this

    7. Re:Such a sad story. by digitalgiblet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if the internet is caused by depression?

    8. Re:Such a sad story. by digitig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A question asked in the RA. '"Excessive internet use is associated with depression, but what we don't know is which comes first -- are depressed people drawn to the internet or does the internet cause depression?," Morrison said.'

      There's a third possibility which the article fails to consider: rather than one causing the other, perhaps both are caused by something else. For example, the person who has difficulty forming satisfying sexual relationships is perhaps likely to get depressed about that and to spend "proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites". The whole thing gets muddy, because that can then form a feedback loop.

      Obligatory link.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    9. Re:Such a sad story. by memnock · · Score: 2, Informative

      their results found 1.4% of study subject affected. you could probably find 1.4% of Internet addicted people are clergy. or moms. or happy.

    10. Re:Such a sad story. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      What if heavy internet usage is caused by being depressed rather than causing it?

      That would be a link, as in "Heavy internet use linked to depression."

    11. Re:Such a sad story. by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      Let's just get this particular joke over with. There are funnier things to poke fun at, people. This is Slashdot, I expected more.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    12. Re:Such a sad story. by EasyTarget · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think there might be more truth to that comment than we imagine..

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    13. Re:Such a sad story. by revboden · · Score: 1

      Clearly... heavy internet usage causes loss of girlfriend which causes loss of "getting sum" which causes increased facebook use which causes people to look at old high school pictures which causes people to think about the 80's which causes more internet usage. It's simple really

    14. Re:Such a sad story. by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a way it may be equated to substance abuse. Technically, one could drown their self in books as a distraction -- the main differences being the amount of moderation, and the lack of the interactive element (though from what I understand from TFA, it's mainly consumption of content they're referring to). People used to place themselves in front of the TV for 8 hours a day, and that was also linked to depression, or at least social dysfunction.

      I think that most people who read Slashdot, and especially anyone who posts, spends a lot of time online, but that's just pointing to "a media" (or is it a "medium" in this context?). What a person does when they're online is far more relevant than just the fact that they're online.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    15. Re:Such a sad story. by derGoldstein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That question ("we don't know is which comes first -- are depressed people drawn to the internet or does the internet cause depression?") can also be answered with: "both". The two are not mutually exclusive. It's a chicken and egg question, and in this case any of the two may be true in different scenarios. You're definitely right about the feedback loop -- it would be the same with alcohol or drugs in this sense (one could lead to the other, which would then lead to more of the first).

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    16. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say, if someones life, like mine, turns out to be not as exciting as those of actor/actresses and other role models that media has impose, some people would rely on the internet to wrongly read about other people's success and probably fake exciting lives to realize once again their life may be not as good. Rinse/repeat and people will of course be depressed after a while. Now the issue is what pages are people frequently visitin and if that is more correlated than just plainly argue it's the internet.

    17. Re:Such a sad story. by dubbreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd have to agree. I have experienced it and have family and friends as well. I sought distraction in other ways (speeding on motorcycles and drinking) and they were definitely not the cause. When you feel like shit you seek ways to make yourself feel anything else. Numb is a step up from depressed.

      I found anti-depressants (SSRIs, MAO inhibitors.. any kind I tried) numbing. Yes it made daily life more livable but I was stuck on 98%. I just wasn't quite there on the drugs. Life was better with drugs than without them at the time, but not quite as good as life prior w/o the drugs. Once I got off the anti-depressants I finally was able to have days where I felt 100%. I no longer feel slightly withdrawn from life (despite the fact I'm a software dev). Of course getting off antidepressants can be a bitch (withdrawal symptoms can be pretty bad).

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    18. Re:Such a sad story. by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any content consumption can lead to different states of mind. Read enough Nietzsche (and/or that school of philosophy) and I dare you to stay optimistic.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    19. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I know bad weather is.

    20. Re:Such a sad story. by Myria · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have severe depression, and have suicidal thoughts pretty much every day. I use the Web and WoW to escape from my persistent gender dysphoria. In chat rooms and online games, I can be a girl, but not in real life.

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    21. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      I have battled with depression for many years, and if the net wasn't available it was something else.
      Self-medication its called. Better than drugs and alcohol. Its possible to actually learn something.
      But of course the big bad internet gets the blame this time to.

    22. Re:Such a sad story. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (though from what I understand from TFA, it's mainly consumption of content they're referring to).

      That is the exact reason that I use the Web so often: content of any kind. I read a lot of things, and follow a few topics just out of the need to not ruminate on things. Message boards, chatrooms, etc. all help me communicate at some level after a period of very intense depression (such as now, where I just had to drop a semester), where the anxiety is killer.

      --
      SSC
    23. Re:Such a sad story. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, I expected more.

      I think expecting more was your first mistake. *drools*

      --
      SSC
    24. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must be new here.

    25. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its true, it happened to my avatar on 2nd life!!!!

    26. Re:Such a sad story. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I tend to go with symptom rather than cause.

      Though there may be contributing factors, it is a sedentary activity, the amount of exercise that you engage in has a pretty powerful effect on mood, as does food intake, etc.

      I have been through bouts of severe depression myself, and always spent a lot of time online. What I notice from reading this is that the habbits shown as stereotypical of a depressed person, line up pretty well with what I did when I was depressed. Today I spend many hours online (partially due to my job, partially hobby projects), but, spend hardly any time on gaming sites (I still game but prefer to do it on my 360), rarely seek out porn (nearly every day while depressed).

      Another thing, I used to keep online journals (predating lj). The more severe the depression, the more I wanted to write about and and log what a miserable bastard I was becoming. As soon as I started feeling better about my life, and the racing spiraling thought patterns went away.... so did my desire to keep any manner of journal.

      Now I spend as many hours online. Now I tend to be pissed off about something politically, writing/debugging code on a personal project, or reading up on something that fascinates me. I hit up the occasional social networking site, or try to arrange a date with someone new. Though since I am mostly happy in my primary relationship, and not feeling like I NEED external validation to feel good, well... its hardly a priority. (actually, sometimes I wish she would see her secondaries just a bit more so I could have some more xbox time and/or get a bit more coding done... two gamers and one xbox is probably not a long term strategy for a happy marriage)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    27. Re:Such a sad story. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      It's okay, most women in chatrooms are really men anyway. d:

      (But seriously, I have a friend with gender dysphoria and I understand the appeal. It's hard for that person sometimes. At least s/he can go to raves and get away with dressing any which way they please and not have to worry about the consequences.)

    28. Re:Such a sad story. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Stories like this make me cry.

    29. Re:Such a sad story. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree. I've also been through periods of depression. When I'm having a good day and do nothing but internet, I end up feeling like shit. When I'm not having a good day, and I force myself out and about, I feel a lot better by the end of it. I'm sure there's some causation going both ways.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:Such a sad story. by Putr · · Score: 1

      I've been suffering from depression for a while now and I'm on antidepressants, and i have to agree that Internet addiction (or as in my case, adiction to chain watching movies/tv shows) is defenetly a side efect not the couse.

    31. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately there's plenty on the web to make one laugh and so alleviate some of the sinking feelings. Not a cure maybe, but better than just sitting alone wondering if life is worth it.

    32. Re:Such a sad story. by Putr · · Score: 1

      There's a third possibility which the article fails to consider: rather than one causing the other, perhaps both are caused by something else. For example, the person who has difficulty forming satisfying sexual relationships is perhaps likely to get depressed about that and to spend "proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites". The whole thing gets muddy, because that can then form a feedback loop.

      Are you talking about me? No seriously how do you know that about me?

    33. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to a perfect storm of life events, I became profoundly depressed and medications were not helping. Even when I couldn't get out of bed, the Net gave me an activity I could cope with and a reason to keep going. It also gave me a social life when the anxiety that went with the depression kept me housebound. Finally, World of Warcraft repaired my damaged brain chemistry by providing food for my reward centers. Once my dopamine was back up to normal, I was able to recover.
      In my case, the internet was the lifeline I needed to get back to health.

      Maybe the increased use the study found was self-medication, and depressed folks who didn't use the Net more were so disabled they were not available for research.

    34. Re:Such a sad story. by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Judging from my own experiences as someone who has suffered from depression for roughly half of my life (and someone who has attempted to end it), I would have to say that depression is the cause, and heavy internet use is the symptom. It's an escape mechanism. Instead of constantly thinking of death, you can get on the Web and try to distract yourself.

      Couldn't internet addiction, be part of a feedback cycle keeping you depressed? Less sun, less contact with people firsthand, less social life, and if it's addiction, less sense of accomplishment (because you get less accomplished), declining hygiene standards, etcetera.

      The internet is one good way of connecting with people but still being secluded and feeling empty. I mean, being "friended" on facebook, a number tons of people promote, ends up being a good illustration on the tons of superficial relationships typical of online life -- making depression even worse. (To be sure, there are sites that facilitate sociality like meetup groups and dating sites...)

      I seen friends go through that and also feel that way just working on a computer most of the day at times, without the addiction part (which is why I ride a bike to work now...)

    35. Re:Such a sad story. by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

      I second that emotion. As somebody who as well periodically suffers from depression, I find that I turn to the internet as a source of mental stimulation. Something to keep my brain occupied.

    36. Re:Such a sad story. by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks god books aren't injectable. I wouldn't have any usable veins left.

    37. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Always remember that you are not alone. I have similar problems, and there are many like us.

    38. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Gore has depression?

    39. Re:Such a sad story. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was like you long ago, but then I stopped giving a fuck about what others thought of me. Made life 100% better.

      After I fixed that problem, I turned to the internet again because of new problems - one of them is that all of my friends got married and had kids, or they work exhausting hours. Do I envy them? Hell no, because I can go pub-crawling or kayaking while they're stuck indoors wasting all of their money and hard work on nagging, domineering wives and screaming, crapping, defiant kids. When they do have free time to visit we're always stuck at their house playing xBox with 5 year-olds or kicked out to the cold-ass garage before their wife makes me leave at 10pm on a Saturday. They're fucking miserable. Do not take your freedom for granted. Do not envy happy-looking couples, you don't see all of the fighting and control struggles behind the scenes.

      The other problem is having non-nerd friends. Everybody I know in real life is not very articulate and conversation is about typical, non-controversial things. Time spent on each topic is kept to a minimum. Trying to start a deep conversation about politics or technology rights just causes them to scratch their heads and rub their eyes in irritation.

      But things are different on the internet. What's so cool about the internet? Not having to give a fuck about what people think! Nigger, for example. There will always be at least 1 niche that will welcome your weirdness with open arms so that you don't have to deal with all of those hypocrites, phonies, and rubes we encounter in real life. Create a strong persona on the internet and become that persona. Let its toughness change your behavior in real life. Then, when you no longer give a fuck about what others think, they'll try harder to get your attention and win your approval. Pussy will throw itself at you left and right.

    40. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering your attitude, and given the choice of wasting you or the OP, I'd be checking your height for the box.

    41. Re:Such a sad story. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Dang it. I had managed to not thinking about death all morning.

      Why did I get on the internet and read your post???

      This is very depressing.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    42. Re:Such a sad story. by Dzonatas · · Score: 0

      Major depressive disorder (MDD) is defined as "no known cause" for depression. This would give weight to say that the Internet is a symptom for relief from depression, as stated and attempted "try to distract." It's better then being a zombie or deep in loss of something better to do than suffer in the the pain with nobody else nearby to help or talk to immediately.

    43. Re:Such a sad story. by BlueParrot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have severe depression, and have suicidal thoughts pretty much every day. I use the Web and WoW to escape from my persistent gender dysphoria. In chat rooms and online games, I can be a girl, but not in real life.

      I've been in your exact same situation only a few months ago. As it happens going on estradiol and testosterone blockers have more or less pushed me from suicidal to feeling better than I even thought was humanly possible (was hard to predict in advance when you have little to compare with). Unfortunately not everybody has the same reaction, but if you're not already on them I can only recommend you give hormones a very serious thought. I know it can be hard to get them many places ( I was forced to self-medicate myself ) and that things are not that easy, but seeing your post more or less described my life 6 months ago I just wanted to let you know that things can get a heck of a lot better.

    44. Re:Such a sad story. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      What if heavy internet usage is caused by being depressed rather than causing it?

      Next you'll be coming up with some crazy, way-out theory that people get depressed by habitual negative thinking ;)

    45. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      judging from my own experiences i'd say that the escape mechanisms for depression can help reinforce that depression. the days i've felt the best are the days i've made myself do things i didn't feel like doing, ranging from cleaning up around home which improves both my environment and gives a sense of accomplishment, to just riding my bike across town, walking around the downtown area and looking for odd little shops i would have never found otherwise.

    46. Re:Such a sad story. by Catskul · · Score: 1
      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    47. Re:Such a sad story. by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was like you long ago, but then I stopped giving a fuck about what others thought of me. Made life 100% better.

      I mostly agree, with the exception of cases where you care about the person's opinion, and for the right reasons. I don't give a damn what my neighbor thinks because that's just geographical coincidence, but if I choose to become someone's friend, I would at least "give some damn", otherwise why do I choose to consider this person my friend? Family is more complicated, of course, and everyone has to make their own choices there. But apart from those cases, the only thing that should concern you is functionality: don't get on your boss' nerves because he'll fire you, and don't piss off a heavy-weight boxer that's standing right in front of you, because, well, darwinism.

      After I fixed that problem, I turned to the internet again because of new problems - one of them is that all of my friends got married and had kids, or they work exhausting hours. Do I envy them? Hell no, because I can go pub-crawling or kayaking while they're stuck indoors wasting all of their money and hard work on nagging, domineering wives and screaming, crapping, defiant kids. When they do have free time to visit we're always stuck at their house playing xBox with 5 year-olds or kicked out to the cold-ass garage before their wife makes me leave at 10pm on a Saturday. They're fucking miserable. Do not take your freedom for granted. Do not envy happy-looking couples, you don't see all of the fighting and control struggles behind the scenes.

      That's a matter of perspective and opinion. It's not really related to this topic. It's a valid opinion, in the sense that you're free to do with your life as you will, but I wouldn't say that it's the correct "advice" for everyone. I know several people who were just aimlessly wandering through life until they met the right person, not only to spend their life with, but also to motivate them. If that's not the case for you then that's fine, but I don't think that people keep getting married and having children just to keep the human species from extinction.

      The other problem is having non-nerd friends. Everybody I know in real life is not very articulate and conversation is about typical, non-controversial things. Time spent on each topic is kept to a minimum. Trying to start a deep conversation about politics or technology rights just causes them to scratch their heads and rub their eyes in irritation.

      You're the one who decides who you spend time with. You say that it's a "problem", but if it were really troubling you, then according to what you say in this post, you'd have no problem telling them flat out that they're boring you and you're not interested in seeing them again.

      But things are different on the internet. What's so cool about the internet? Not having to give a fuck about what people think! Nigger, for example. There will always be at least 1 niche that will welcome your weirdness with open arms so that you don't have to deal with all of those hypocrites, phonies, and rubes we encounter in real life. Create a strong persona on the internet and become that persona. Let its toughness change your behavior in real life. Then, when you no longer give a fuck about what others think, they'll try harder to get your attention and win your approval. Pussy will throw itself at you left and right.

      Yes and no. Your post is a very good example. By being so aggressive, some people will simply skip over what you've said and dismiss you as a "brute" or a troll, not even considering your argument. The ad-hominem effect kicks in (you'll be dismissed because of who you are, or how you behave, rather than what you say), and you've just lost a lot of people's attention, not all of whom you'd normally choose to filter out. If I know that I'm in an environment that doesn't mind cursing, then I'll cuss like a sailor, but I'd still respect someone

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    48. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, I am in your debt.

    49. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you make some good points... But I still think you should keep taking your meds.

    50. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    51. Re:Such a sad story. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Al Gore has depression?

      What do you think Cap and Trade is about? He's not trying to limit Greenhouse gases. He's trying to spread out his depression so he doesn't feel so bad.

    52. Re:Such a sad story. by meustrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent down, please. I'd rather not listen to Maddox (the jock asshole persona) telling me how the Internet is great because it's just like High School Musical (stop caring about cliques and what other people think, and they will magically think better of you and we can all be in this together)

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    53. Re:Such a sad story. by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep. Before the internet, depressed people stayed inside and stared at the wall. Now they're staring at a computer screen.

      But you KNOW the media's gonna try to spin it as "the internet depresses people! (see more, on our website)"

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    54. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pussy will throw itself at you left and right.

      Yikes... I would hate to see the pussy throwing itself at you! All the Salinger obituaries got you re-reading your "Catcher in the Rye" this week?

    55. Re:Such a sad story. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      What if the internet is caused by depression?

      I think we already know the cause of the internet (and VHS and DVD): porn.

    56. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big nerd and recovering social-retard.

      Your point about "having non-nerd friends" is essential. I've also found it easy to meet new people if i just remember to ask questions. Showing interest in other people makes a big difference, especially with the ladies.

      Just as a note, there are at least some "happy looking "couples out there that are actually happy. I'm part of one. My wife is totally awesome, last night she baked me a cake just because i had jokingly mentioned iton the phone! we do crap like that for each other all the time because we think it's fun! she's the nicest person i know and she is a tight body smokin' hot golden blonde !

      We established good communication early on, mainly the following.

      If we're hurt, we promise not to keep it from eachother, we'll just tell eachother. i won't be a dick, i'll assume you wont be a dick, you do the same. if it's obvious either of us are bein' dicks we can call each other on it.

      we really try to stick to that and you know what? we have an awesome time almost every day! sure there are days when after a bit you have to admit "hey, sorry i was being a dick, i musta' forgoten to eat breakfast and i'm tired" but we never fight, because we already decided that we don't want to. if we really disagree about something one of us will just fold and it's no big deal.

      Good points man
      1.F what people think
      2.Find the good people out there

      -S

    57. Re:Such a sad story. by corbettw · · Score: 1

      So hanging out on Slashdot, Fark, or Facebook is one step below suicide? Yeah, that sounds about right.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    58. Re:Such a sad story. by bit9 · · Score: 1

      Definitely agree with the parent that internet use is a symptom rather than a cause. I too have, at various times in my life, been severely depressed and have seriously contemplated suicide.

      However, in my case, the internet was more than merely a distraction. I was reaching out for something or someone (anything, really) that would make me feel welcome, wanted, or even just a part of something, instead of feeling like I was completely disconnected and alone.

      Of course, the internet, generally speaking, is not such a great avenue for that. Sure, you can go into a chat room at 3am and meet someone from halfway around the world, but that's not the same thing as making a real human connection.

      I was one of the rare few (or perhaps not so rare - who knows) that suffered from fairly severe, debilitating depression, but was able to pull myself out of it without drugs or therapy. I'm not saying those methods are somehow inferior, mind you - only that I managed to come out of it despite the fact that I never sought treatment. Instead, I managed to talk myself out of it - I spent countless days and hours pondering my situation and eventually arrived at some critical insights that led me out of my "bad place". In retrospect, I wish I'd sought treatment, and I would not recommend anybody try to battle depression on their own.

      I'm rambling here a bit, but I have a point. One of those critical insights I eventually arrived at was that the internet (by which I'm referring generically to BBSes, chat rooms, forums, WoW, and any/all other types of online interaction) never was, and never would be anything other than a dead end, in terms of helping with my depression. Seems silly, and fairly obvious now that I look back, but in my mind at the time, the "real world" had already failed me, and the internet was my last resort. It was an alluring thought, too - that although nobody I interacted with in my day to day life ever really understood me or appreciated me, somehow, some way, in the unimaginable vastness of the internet, I would find someone who did. It took me almost a decade to realize that despite its vastness, the internet was as barren and empty as space when it came to finding real, meaningful human contact.

    59. Re:Such a sad story. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      The internet is one good way of connecting with people but still being secluded and feeling empty. I mean, being "friended" on facebook, a number tons of people promote, ends up being a good illustration on the tons of superficial relationships typical of online life -- making depression even worse. (To be sure, there are sites that facilitate sociality like meetup groups and dating sites...)

      I disagree. I've been more social in person ever since Facebook. Mostly because I get invited to random things and see events that happen in the local area and friends I haven't seen in ages will send me a message asking if I want to hang out.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    60. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow. You describe the things I am going through for years and years now. Nice to know I'm not alone on Slashdot.

      Like you I use female characters in the MMO's I play as an outlet for what is going on inside me. Everyone I play City of Heroes with think I am a youngish girl and treat me like their little sister -- both women and men.

      Sorry for posting anon, but I'm not as brave as you =)

      Again, thank you for letting me feel not so alone.

    61. Re:Such a sad story. by Strake · · Score: 1

      Pussy will throw itself at you left and right.

      Catnip.

      Other means, same end.

      Mind the claws.

    62. Re:Such a sad story. by Strake · · Score: 1

      I don't think that people keep getting married and having children just to keep the human species from extinction.

      Actually, that is exactly why they do so -- because, well, Darwinism.

    63. Re:Such a sad story. by Digana · · Score: 1

      you don't have to deal with all of those hypocrites, phonies, and rubes we encounter in real life.

      Holden? Is that you?

    64. Re:Such a sad story. by Eil · · Score: 1

      Mr. Carlin...... is that really you?

    65. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had me until:

      Pussy will throw itself at you left and right

      Slashdotters don't have sex!

    66. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you've never poked your head into irc.tssupport.org/#tssupport, say hi sometime =)
      There are at least a few /.'ers there...

    67. Re:Such a sad story. by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's because the internet can provide quick satisfaction, so people with depressions are more likely to go on the internet ?

      I mean , people with depressions also tend to eat chocolates and ice cream , to get quick satisfaction , that doesn't mean that eating chocolates or ice cream cause depressions.

    68. Re:Such a sad story. by BigWaveUglyDave · · Score: 1

      There's a third possibility which the article fails to consider:

      The third one you bring up rings home for me, absolutely. I attempted different perspectives and extremes to break my own cycle, most of them never hitting the root cause for depression. It wasn't until I opened up to my girlfriend about what I wanted in our sex life that I began the steps towards a satisfying sexual relationship. A few weeks passed by and I noticed I wasn't surfing "sexually gratifying websites", I just didn't need too. Yea, pr0n isn't a bad thing, nor does it exclusively cause depression. In my case, it was an escape. Like with anything else, overtime the escape is problematic and will muddy the waters. ...anybody ever watch that episode of Coupling where Jeff talks about Cpt. Subtext?

    69. Re:Such a sad story. by Xest · · Score: 1

      Oh my, when did browsing the internet and posting simply because of boredom/procrastination at work go out of fashion?

    70. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it's more of a two-way street. My own anecdotal evidence goes the other way. There are times in my job when I've nothing much to do for several days on end, and it's not unknown for me to kill part of the time at least by cruising the web. I've learned that I mustn't overdo it, though, because after a couple of hours of passive cruising (as opposed to, say, posting comments on /. about cruising the web) I feel thoroughly fed-up and physically tired (the difference, when I walk out of the building and into the fresh air at the end of the day is massive, and akin to being reborn). If I were more of a depressive type it would be about the worst thing that I could possibly do. I should stress that it's not using a computer per se that has that effect (I use a terminal for most of my working day without any obvious problems, and I spend quite a bit of time online in MMOs with friends, which I find positively stimulating). It seems to be the near-lack of any real intellectual engagement that does it.

    71. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Life was better with drugs than without them at the time, but not quite as good as life prior w/o the drugs." You are a genius.

      I'm still trying to figure out my wife. She's always two steps ahead and never far behind.

    72. Re:Such a sad story. by carolfromoz · · Score: 1

      while they're stuck indoors wasting all of their money and hard work on nagging, domineering wives and screaming, crapping, defiant kids.

      On the family negativism - it's not all bad. The other night I was reading Hitchhiker's to my 10yr old and he laughed so hard he fell off the couch. Then we went to youtube and watched some of the old tv episodes. He's also starting to get interested in computers and what I do for my job. Sure it can be hard when they're little, but having a kid around who gets a huge kick out of all my nerdy interests, and is also good fun to take camping, bike riding and x-country skiing, is worth all the sleep deprivation and potty nightmares he put me through years ago.

    73. Re:Such a sad story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just kill yourself then, quit whining.

      Congratulations. Worst troll I've seen this week.

      Please die.

    74. Re:Such a sad story. by RugidChild · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on that. But some people are also just awkward in social settings when they are around other people. I don't think I suffer from severe depression but when I am gaming on my pc at home I see it as a stress relief instead of a way to hide in a fantasy world. If I didn't game and instead went to a bar, I would come out drunk and worse off than when I went in there.

  2. I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    have you SEEN what's on there?

    1. Re:I'll say... by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Porn, untold amounts of porn, and untold amounts of geeks' fantasies never being fulfilled.

    2. Re:I'll say... by Nathrael · · Score: 2, Informative

      And Rule 34 of Rosie O'Donnel.

      What has been seen cannot be unseen! YEARGH EYE CANCER!

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    3. Re:I'll say... by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's more likely to get you depressed -- overexposure to porn, or overexposure to 4chan?
      Suppose you have a person who has very few social connections (just the ones they need to survive, like work relationships), and is also relatively isolated from their family (for whatever reason). Is it worse to saturate that person's mind with porn, or to dedicate a lot of time to, let's face it, some cruel, sadistic, and generally hateful communities that exist online?

      I'm definitely not trying to legitimize extreme porn consumption, but if we're talking about what leads people to depression, I think that there are more dangerous elements.
      (I actually just gave 4chan as an example to point out an overall direction -- there are far worse places, where hatred and malice are directed to whichever cause you can think up)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    4. Re:I'll say... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      untold amounts of geeks' fantasies never being fulfilled

      Yeah, but the untold amounts of simpsons references should cancel some of that out.

    5. Re:I'll say... by skine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you have a link?

    6. Re:I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, thanks to 4chan, I am completely desensitized to all manner of shocking things, and I laugh at dead babies.

    7. Re:I'll say... by Dmala · · Score: 1

      (I actually just gave 4chan as an example to point out an overall direction -- there are far worse places, where hatred and malice are directed to whichever cause you can think up)

      Like the YouTube comments section... *shudder*

    8. Re:I'll say... by xaxa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually just gave 4chan as an example to point out an overall direction -- there are far worse places, where hatred and malice are directed to whichever cause you can think up

      That's not unique to the Internet.

      One of my flatmates watches three British soaps: EastEnders, Coronation Street and Emmerdale. I don't watch them myself, but sometimes I see what's happening if I'm cooking when she's home. Most of the time, it's people shouting at each other, arguing, cheating, backstabbing, and generally spreading hatred around them. It's awful.

    9. Re:I'll say... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      YEARGH EYE CANCER!

      My girlfriend, an eccentric ophthalmic technician, has an A4-size glossy photograph stuck on the refrigerator of a nice case of eye cancer. It's right beside the dinner table where everyone can see it. When people say "YEAAARGH WHAT IS THAT!" she says "that's what happens if you don't wear sunglasses." (She goes on to point out that the person in question lived, and it's one of the ways she gets through the day, thinking of people that can still see because of her efforts.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    10. Re:I'll say... by Shikaku · · Score: 1
  3. The next line states... by loftwyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

    So, what we have here is an article with no actual basis for conclusions. Nothing to see here, move along

    1. Re:The next line states... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All they are saying is that they noted Correlation, not implying causation.

    2. Re:The next line states... by sexconker · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Welcome to modern journalism.

      OMG HEADLINE!

      Titillating content.

      One line note explaining how everything you read was pure speculation on the part of the writer, and that there are no real conclusions to be drawn from the study/events/whatever that the writer tricked you into thinking the article was about.

    3. Re:The next line states... by Taibhsear · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seconded. Could it be that perhaps people are depressed by not getting the attention they desire and thus go to the internet for it? The study is a failure if it finds both ends of the argument plausible and no concrete evidence for either.

    4. Re:The next line states... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

      But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

      Exactly. And an earlier study showed a correlation between television watching and depression. Worth repeating: correlation is not always causation.

      In this case, I could easily see the correlation as: depressed people are too depressed to do anything requiring activity, so they tend to sit around and watch television or surf the web.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    5. Re:The next line states... by Emb3rz · · Score: 2, Informative

      browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and online communities

      All of which would likely increase activity of which neuro-transmitter? Did anyone say dopamine? And what else increases dopamine activity? More witches! Err, no. Certain classes of drugs, illicit or otherwise. And depression is provably related to imbalances in norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine. I'd love to get a real biologist's take on this research.

    6. Re:The next line states... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Duh. Depressed people generally want to avoid social interaction, or take it in short bursts at their own pace as it suits them. The Internet is perfect for this. The excessive time spent online is a symptom, not a cause.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    7. Re:The next line states... by Hellpop · · Score: 1

      Maybe Causation causes Correlation now?

      I would put money on it being the other way around.

      Depression has been around much longer than teh intarnets.

      --
      "People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything."
    8. Re:The next line states... by dintlu · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that article is worthless and I don't know where I can find the actual paper.

      While the article describes 1.2% of Britons between 15 and 51 years of age as being "internet addicted, it does NOT tell us how much the likelihood of depression increases among those addicts when compared to non-addicts.

      I don't see a discussion of depression rates by age or other socioeconomic factors, either. People under the age of 30 are more likely to have been online their entire adult lives, people from wealthy families are likely to have been online sooner in life. People over 40 have divided experience- life before the internet, and life after - examining the mental health history of this particular subset of study participants would be very illuminating. I honestly would not be surprised if the study discusses all these factors and more.

      This moment in history is the ONLY time we will have the opportunity to study differences between people who experienced life without the internet and people who have had access their entire lives, and it's a damned shame that these lousy newspapers distill such interesting science down to water cooler conversation points.

    9. Re:The next line states... by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Not having a PhD, no data, and not having RTFA, I'd guess that it's the second one.

      As someone who suffers from regular bouts of depression (as well as daily depression periods relating to certain bodily functions), I know from first-hand experience that the internet is a great distraction for depression. You momentarily forget your woes when you find a video of a kitten going 'NOM NOM NOM' or play some flash game (or go to sexually gratifying websites.) Online communities are great because they are mostly homogeneous (sites like /. being an obvious exception; there's some homogeneity, but it's not all-encompassing like most communities), so you get communities for the few things you actually have interest in, or that share your general outlook on the world and so are great for complaining to or discussing with.

      The internet allows you to lose some of yourself for a short while, and in a state of depression that's often something you want to do. It also keeps you away from real physical contact (at least for myself, in a depressed state I don't want to be around anyone) while being more active than just watching TV.

    10. Re:The next line states... by RJHelms · · Score: 3, Informative

      All they are saying is that they noted Correlation, not implying causation.

      Yet the summary is written as such. Such a shock for a /. editor not to read something before it's put on the front page.

      No, it doesn't. The summary says "more likely"; that is, as internet use increases, the probability of depression increases. That is the definition of correlation. Implying causation would be using a word like "cause". (I know, tricky concept) Which the summary doesn't.

    11. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Worth repeating: correlation is not always causation."

      What also bears repeating is one thing leads to another, my mother didn't think she would get addicted to cigarettes 30 years ago, she's almost 60 and still smokes. The truth about the matter is one thing can lead to another, spending a disproportionate amount of time in any activity will mean you will be weaker in other area's of your life. It's a vicious cycle that has to be broken.

    12. Re:The next line states... by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

      So, what we have here is an article with no actual basis for conclusions. Nothing to see here, move along

      Of course, these are the fields of psychology and human behavior. Even the best work done by Pavlov or Skinner aren't 100% proven. They are, however, very interesting observations and empirical data that assist us in beginning to understand the human psyche. You're never going to have a completely proven conclusion from studies and surveys like this. And the people working within these fields are therefore subjected to the very opposite of what a mathematician or physicist would get if they made similarly sized discoveries in their field.

      The free variables are endless since humans can produce some of the most random and erratic behavior out there. And you'll never isolate and control all of these variables in your experiments and surveys. You can certainly hit the most obvious ones but humans are an odd lot. The hope is that a large enough sample size yields empirical data to make it 'good enough.' But everyone in the sample was British. Is there something about that culture or the internet service in that country that adds to depression? Are internet addicts more depressed in Iran and China because of the censorship? Less depressed in Scandinavian countries because the internet is cheaper and their culture embraces it? Who knows?

      The really inconvenient thing these researchers have working against them is that their subjects are humans. We're not dealing with a poisonous snake that rarely bites but sporadically lashes out 1.2% of the time so they should always be handled with all sorts of protection ... no, we're dealing with children and adults, real people. Similar to early twenties Arabs being constantly hassled at airports, British children might face their mum doling out a hundred quid a week to some shrink who convinced them that he plays video games and surfs online he's more likely to be depressed. Never mind that the money might have been better spent on food and clothing or even entertainment to fight the alleged depression. The other problem is that news of this report gives heavy internet usage a bad wrap and it comes to be seen as impurity or a liability or even a counterculture (this might already be happening in some countries).

      I'm not a psychologist, I've read some books but never studied the field. My direction of thinking would be to have a follow on study where heavy internet users who were also depressed were given surveys before and after completing many hours of internet usage in which they rate their overall mood versus non-internet activities where the same survey is completed. I think you'll find that depressed people are drawn to it for various reasons and your results would generate random noise and not a trend for mood to drop while using the internet or gaming. Maybe they feel insecure of their looks or stature in real life and online they're eldavojohn and not the fat kid that gets picked on and beat up at school? Maybe it's just another escape like Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels were for me as a kid? Maybe home is a very painful place with separated parents or not enough money or not enough material things so they escape online where everything is virtual? The possibilities are endless and I hope the public and psychology as a whole learn to look for the root of the problem and not use heavy internet usage as a symptom of a disease.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    13. Re:The next line states... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Do what they say, say what they mean
      One thing leads to another
      You told me something wrong, I know I listened too long
      But then one thing leads to another
      One thing leads to another

    14. Re:The next line states... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      And an earlier study showed a correlation between television watching [suite101.com] and depression [naturalnews.com]

      wait What?

      I watch Tv on the internet......

      I am so boned..... CRAP!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:The next line states... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The study is a failure if it finds both ends of the argument plausible and no concrete evidence for either.

      No, it is not a failure. It succeeds in saying, "we observed this phenomenon, it's significant, and it might be worth studying further." Science succeeds when it places observations before conclusions; it fails when it does the opposite, as people like you seem to want it to do. Establishing that something exists in the first place is the prerequisite for everything that follows.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    16. Re:The next line states... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Who cares which way it works if you want to identify depressed individuals then correlation alone is useful. You know the population of heavy internet and tv users will be a good place to search out depressed individuals. These are characteristics easy to spot and easy to survey. You then spend your time doing more analysis on the people in the group to find the specific target. It is going to be alot more efficient than searching the general population.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    17. Re:The next line states... by iyntsiannaistnyi · · Score: 1

      It's probably obvious, but I did want to point out that depression is very different from "not getting the attention they desire".

    18. Re:The next line states... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Having a PhD does not help. I went and asked the guy here with 2 of them. (ever seen real genius? remember laslo? we hired him. WE have a no smoking in the building, his office he chain smokes....) 1 in computer science and 1 in archeology.

      He had no clue either.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:The next line states... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was in reference to the "sexually gratifying websites" in the article. Depression is obviously more serious than that.

    20. Re:The next line states... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The study is a failure if it finds both ends of the argument plausible and no concrete evidence for either.

      Dude, did you even read TFA??? Take these three sentences ....

      People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression, British scientists said on Wednesday.

      But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

      "Excessive internet use is associated with depression, but what we don't know is which comes first -- are depressed people drawn to the internet or does the internet cause depression?"

      All they have said is that people who spend a large amount of time on the internet might also correlate with depressed people, and that people should look out for it.

      They absolutely find both ends of the argument plausible, and explicitly said so.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:The next line states... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Welcome to modern journalism.

      OMG HEADLINE!

      Titillating content.

      One line note explaining how everything you read was pure speculation on the part of the writer, and that there are no real conclusions to be drawn from the study/events/whatever that the writer tricked you into thinking the article was about.

      By modern, you mean the last 100+ years, right?

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    22. Re:The next line states... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I have truly suffered from clinical depression for over twenty years. I manage it well; no pills; very few people in the real world know. I had it before the internet, during and probably after.

      When I'm suffering, I don't get a lot of sleep, so I spend more time on the internet. It's as simple as that.

      And I didn't RTFA because the comments on Slashdot said not to bother. :-)

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    23. Re:The next line states... by dnahelicase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that better than being fat? I keep hearing that obesity is greater among people that spend an above average amount of time watching TV and surfing the web. I think they must have missed that link. Internets lead to obesity, obesity leads to poor self image, poor self image leads to depression, depression leads to loneliness, loneliness leads to porn! Hence the internets only lead to creating porn addicts and pirates. Which is why we need the FCC watching over the tubes...

    24. Re:The next line states... by hduff · · Score: 1

      But it is not clear whether the Internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

      So, what we have here is an article with no actual basis for conclusions. Nothing to see here, move along

      On the contrary, it's a perfect article for the Slashdot crowd since it foments introspection and may provide personal insight.

      In other news, living in your parent's basement is linked to depression.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    25. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it doesn't. The summary says "more likely"; that is, as internet use increases, the probability of depression increases. That is the definition of correlation. Implying causation would be using a word like "cause". (I know, tricky concept) Which the summary doesn't.

      The word "cause" would assert causation. When the summary says:

      People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression

      it suggests causation, because that does not sound the same as:

      People showing signs of depression are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet

      One might agree that those sentences are formally equivalent (in an idealized version of english), but the way most people speak, those sentences suggest different causations.

    26. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but it makes for a good sensational newspaper story!

    27. Re:The next line states... by Klync · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I wish I had mod points to give you for that one. "+1 Explaining human nature to a geek"

      --

      ----
      Not to be confused with Col.
    28. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just to let you know, Natural News is one of those whacked out anti-science sites. You know, pro-homeopathy, pro-naturopathy, anti-vaccine, anti-evidence based medicine. The same people who thing correlation really does equal causation (for example, the guys who run that site claim vaccines cause autism). I mean, I'm sure it was just the first link that came up when you searched, but in the future you might want to go with the second link there, because that site is deep in the stupid.

    29. Re:The next line states... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Yes, a failure.

      Screw that dumb scientific method thing, in which showing correlation is the first step you take when you think "I suspect that A causes B let us see if that is true".

      Much better to just go and try and prove that is how it works without checking if it's even plausible in the first place.

    30. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, is there an "unbiased" way of saying it in normal English?

    31. Re:The next line states... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I suspect it is comments like yours that make people depressed. Just because no causation was demonstrated does not mean that the correlation is not noteworthy. At the very least they are pointing the way to some interesting further research.

    32. Re:The next line states... by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      And an earlier study showed a correlation between television watching [suite101.com] and depression [naturalnews.com].

      And researchers apparently aren't smart enough to realize that depressed people tend to spend most of their time alone, and as such, do solitary activities. That's not a matter of "doing X because they're depressed" it's "they're alone because they're depressed" and "doing X because they are alone".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    33. Re:The next line states... by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

      hehehe you said tit

    34. Re:The next line states... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      The internet turned me into a newt!

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    35. Re:The next line states... by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      The truth about the matter is one thing can lead to another, spending a disproportionate amount of time in any activity will mean you will be weaker in other area's of your life. It's a vicious cycle that has to be broken.

      Glad I broke that cycle of exercise at least. Thats one thing I can definitely say I did without even breaking a sweat! Ah it was glorious, now shoo, its time for my daily use of the web while watching tv sitting on the couch covered in potato chips and guzzling mt dew.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    36. Re:The next line states... by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. Even the title of the story doesn't imply which causes which. Just because they've "only" found a correlation, that doesn't mean there's "nothing to see here".

      --
      Property is theft.
    37. Re:The next line states... by pha7boy · · Score: 1

      What the writer meant to say is that people who suffer from depression are more likely to spend a lot of time on the internet. The idea that it is unclear if people suffering from depression are drawn to the internet is a cop-out on their part (i.e. oh, we need more money to study this). There have been lots of studies to show that people suffering from depression are more likely to turn inward, and seek to escape their reality via different means (alcohol abuse in the past - internet addiction now).

      --
      -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
    38. Re:The next line states... by zacronos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The word "cause" would assert causation. When the summary says:

      People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression

      it suggests causation, because that does not sound the same as:

      People showing signs of depression are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet

      One might agree that those sentences are formally equivalent (in an idealized version of english), but the way most people speak, those sentences suggest different causations.

      More accurately, I would say that both versions of that sentence assert correlation, and the fact that most readers infer causation from any asserted correlation is almost unavoidable. I agree that most readers will infer different causations from those two statements, but that doesn't mean either statement actively suggests causation. I would say that it merely means that both statements fail to explicitly deny the causations that most people who aren't scientifically trained will tend to infer from them.

      This is probably just a semantic argument. If you can think of a way to assert correlation such that causation is not a natural inference for most people, and without sounding awkward or explicitly denying the causation you expect people to infer, I would sincerely love to hear it. My point is that I don't think the summary is written poorly (it doesn't suggest causation more than it can help) -- I don't expect every writer describing a correlation to have to go out of their way to point out that a causation cannot be (correctly) inferred from the described correlation. Maybe in your opinion (and GGP's opinion) writers should do that, in which case I'm just not holding them to such a high standard as you.

    39. Re:The next line states... by pha7boy · · Score: 1
      --
      -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
    40. Re:The next line states... by Trahloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My poor self image in no way has anything to do with the internet. Need proof? I was fat before I ever heard of the internet! HAH! ... now I did troll libraries and read entire sections of it before I got my computer... So I guess libraries cause depression too!

      FFS, some people are just depressed with life, they seek entertainment to help distract them from their own state. Whatever distraction that form takes has nothing to do with the depression. I can think of several reasons why I gained weight at a young age, none of them have to do with TV or my love of reading. Hell every person I know who goes out bar hoping to get laid would be classified as 'depressed' by these researchers most likely and their reasonably fit bastards. A general dissatisfaction with life seems to be one of the hallmarks of humanity and that is a good thing. We wouldn't be where we are if we were all content just living off the land like the other animals.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    41. Re:The next line states... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      ever seen real genius?

      I used to work for a guy with a JD, a PhD in Chemistry, and knowledge equivalent to at least a CCNP if not CCIE. He was also nuttier than squirrel shit. He belonged to the 'natural medicine' quasi-political movement and was always coming up with crazy ideas like building a robotic landform sculpting device from scratch just so he could see topographical LOS representations.

      I also have a friend who is a retired US Army LtCol with a PhD in Business Statistics or something like that and Master Mariner's License who is also an ordained minister (and not just one of those jackasses with a piece of paper from the internet). The Rev. Dr. LtCol./Capt. US Army, retired is quite a mouthful, and he's probably the most interesting guy to have a conversation with that I've ever known or am likely to know.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    42. Re:The next line states... by srussia · · Score: 1

      .

      In this case, I could easily see the correlation as: depressed people are too depressed to do anything requiring activity, so they tend to sit around and watch television or surf the web.

      I postulate a correlation between doing anything and engaging in some kind of activity.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    43. Re:The next line states... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a conclusion for you:

      People who are depressed spend more time on the Internet looking for a life.

      Back in the BBS days (and early Internet days) I would spend time in chat sessions and forums looking for parties, activities, new stuff to learn, of course - porn. I met some of my best friends in chat in the early 90's on the Revolution Calling and Anarchy X BBSs in San Diego. I don't remember being depressed at that time, but I was definitely looking for a life.

      Anyway, the Internet is probably good for those depressed souls. It gives them a place to look for the life they want. Unfortunately, the quality of what they find has decreased over the years.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    44. Re:The next line states... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Worth repeating: correlation is not always causation.

      No, it's not worth repeating. It is repeated so frequently on slashdot that it actually has a negative effect right now by creating a kneejerk reaction where people automatically assume causation is never correlation, which is frequently wrong.

      And in terms of this story, why would showing causation be the goal, anyway? If you are trying to create a program to help depressed people, you could easily just not care whether it is the cause or just a symptom, when your focus is to identify people who you want to help.

    45. Re:The next line states... by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Your message was phrased in such a way that one or more interpretations of your message would be inaccurate. For example, they are NOT saying that if in individual user increases his/her internet use, they are more likely to become depressed.

      C//

    46. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 1

      Well, "spending a lot of time on the internet and showing signs of depression are correlated" would be good, but clearly not understood straight away by many people. One could argue it is better than to be wrongly understood by those people (and then even people understanding correlation can be influenced by the "wrong" formulations, when not paying full attention), and it could provide the opportunity to explain the concept. Yes, it's a pain, but then the fact that not knowing it makes you much more vulnerable to manipulation might justify it. Definitely this is something that should be given more attention in schools, until "correlation" becomes as much understood as "likely".

    47. Re:The next line states... by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      "People showing signs of depression are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet" Is simply not the same as "People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression."

      The first indicates that people with depression are likely to use the internet to a high degree. Since people with depression are found across all socio-economic classes, yet internet access is not, there may be limiting factors that make this sentence simply not true. In fact, depression tends to lead to lower incomes, which may inhibit access to the internet. If you really want to be technical, it is feasible that, although internet addicts are more likely than the general population to be depressed, depressed people could be less likely than the general population to be internet addicts.

      What would be an equivalent statement would be "People who show signs of depression and have internet access, but limited outlets otherwise, are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet" but that's rather clunky. The way it was written was fine.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    48. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A general dissatisfaction with life seems to be one of the hallmarks of humanity and that is a good thing. We wouldn't be where we are if we were all content just living off the land like the other animals.

      True, we would be ... all content! I'm so glad to be dissatisfied with life instead! ;)

    49. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, but a very common mistake. The sentiment is correct but the epithet is inaccurate.

      In formal logic, the following is true:

      (A & B) => ((A => B) | (B => A))

      (Work through the truth tables if you don't believe me)

      i.e. if two things are correlated, then one causes the other.

      What you mean to say is that correlation is not always causation in the assumed direction. If A and B are correlated, it could be that A causes B, but it could be that B causes A. No measurement of correlation alone will tell you which way around this goes.

    50. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the fact that I just read through a 7-deep, anal-retentive discussion on whether or not the summary was poorly worded has certainly made ME depressed.

      But then, it's either that or 50 separate posts (and ensuing discussions) on the tired old Correlation/Causation routine.

      In fact, I'm going to register, just so I can start a new one.
      "Hey guys, Correlation != Causation. Did you ever think of that? Huh???"

      Jumpin' Jesus on a pogo stick, what is wrong with you people... get back to the porn and such.

    51. Re:The next line states... by cl0s · · Score: 1

      depressed people are too depressed to do anything requiring activity, so they tend to sit around and watch television or surf the web.

      what!? surfing the web isn't an activity?

    52. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would get depressed too, if I had to watch the crap that's on TV.

    53. Re:The next line states... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      A general dissatisfaction with life seems to be one of the hallmarks of humanity and that is a good thing.

      I agree, but a general dissatisfaction with life is not moderate to severe depression. It's a debilitating disorder with real symptoms beyond looking for entertainment.

      Hell every person I know who goes out bar hoping to get laid would be classified as 'depressed' by these researchers

      What? Did they get diagnosed with moderate to severe depression? Otherwise, no, these researchers would not classify them as having moderate to severe depression.

    54. Re:The next line states... by zacronos · · Score: 1
      You make a good point, however note that you lose some information in this third version of the statement compared with the original or your 2nd example. In fact, I just realized that you were incorrect when you said that those 2 versions of the statement were formally equivalent. Let's look at the 2:
      1. People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression
      2. People showing signs of depression are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet

      In statement 1, you are asserting that within the population of people who spend a lot of time surfing the internet there are proportionally more people who exhibit signs of depression than within the population of people who do not spend a lot of time surfing the internet.

      In statement 2, you are asserting that within the population of people who show signs of depression there are proportionally more people who spend a lot of time surfing the internet than within the population of people who do not show signs of depression.

      Statistically these two statements may be equivalent (I think they are -- they both assert that the two conditions are correlated, and so each statement implies the other), but they are different in that they suggest what kind of data was used to justify the assertion. Merely saying "spending a lot of time on the internet and showing signs of depression are correlated" doesn't give any indication whether you were examining the population of people who spend a lot of time on the internet or the population of people who show signs of depression (or both), while other two statements do.

    55. Re:The next line states... by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      Hey! IWOARB! (I was once a real Biochemist). Degree and all. I would say you are correct in that those types of things (Especially online gaming with constant "I leveled up" or "I got shiny new armor" will trigger some dopamine feedback. Of course, it probably will also tickle serotonin a bit and of course any change in Dopamine usually triggers a change in GABA.

      It is probably important to note that it is not just online games and drugs that increase Dopamine activity. Having a good time/accomplishing something in real life will do so as well.

      I've had a pet theory for awhile...total unsubstantiated and since I'm out of the field...it is not something that I will be able to test scientifically. I think the current psychiatric treatment method of "Depressed? Take these SSRI's" is a poor plan. The person may not have any issues with their Serotonin (But very well might after you give them drugs to mess with it!) Their depression may be more dopamine related, their anxiety may be more GABA related...whatever. Find out what things (there is usually at least one thing) that makes them feel ok. Often it will be an illicit drug or some type of impulsive activity. Examine what it is that makes them feel better, and pick an "Anti-Depressant" from there. Perhaps they do need an SSRI. Perhaps they need a dopamine fix that Provigil can provide. Perhaps they need a GABA fix that Benzodiazapines can provide. I know that some SSRI's (Effexor, for one) does help a bit with other Neurotransmitters but I think we need to try to direct treatment at single neutrotransmitters (other than just Serotonin) and see how that works out.

    56. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you really want to be technical

      OK, let's be technical. Let:

      D be the number of depressed people; A be the number of internet addicted people; DA be the number of depressed and internet addicted people. T be the total number of people.

      Then: "internet addicts are more likely than the general population to be depressed" means "the proportion of DA among A is greater than the proportion of D among T", or "DA/A > D/T", which is mathematically equivalent (since all number are positive) to "DA*T > D*A".

      "depressed people could be less likely than the general population to be internet addicts" means "the proportion of DA among D is greater than the proportion of A among T", or "DA/D < A/T", which is equivalent "DA*T < D*A".

      it is feasible that, although internet addicts are more likely than the general population to be depressed, depressed people could be less likely than the general population to be internet addicts.

      No.

    57. Re:The next line states... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      (A & B) => ((A => B) | (B => A))
      i.e. if two things are correlated, then one causes the other

      k, but you missed at least the case of (C=>A)&(C=>B) In that case neither causes the other even though A&B tends to be true.

      Also consider that life isn't always as cut and dry as your formal logic; The article makes the following logical statement:
      (A & sometimes B, well enough B that we think there should be further research anyway).

    58. Re:The next line states... by Steve+Max · · Score: 1

      "Correlation found between depression and high Internet usage"?

      I'm not a native English speaker, but that sounds pretty unbiased to me.

    59. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch Tv on the internet......

      I watch the Internet on TV. It's like "Pages from Ceefax", but more up-to-date.

    60. Re:The next line states... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Worth repeating: correlation is not always causation

      Not really since TFA said it, what, 3 times?

      The article made really clear the vague connection in the summery is just a vague connection that warrants further research.

    61. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 1

      I get your point. But since the two sentences are statistically equivalent, it is completely irrelevant which method you used, they lead to the same conclusion. So you could very well examine the population of people who spend a lot of time on the internet, find that they are more depressed than average, and conclude that "people showing signs of depression are more likely to spend a lot of time surfing the internet".

    62. Re:The next line states... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      You go submit that abstract to a peer reviewed journal and see how far it goes.

      And researchers apparently aren't smart enough to realize...

      The researchers found an interesting correlation that they would like to do further research and case studies on to see if people's (your) proposed reasons are true, instead of being all "smart enough" to give the dozens of posible explanations that they haven't yet tested.

    63. Re:The next line states... by syzler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can think of a way to assert correlation such that causation is not a natural inference for most people, and without sounding awkward or explicitly denying the causation you expect people to infer, I would sincerely love to hear it.

      Researchers have found a correlation between levels of depression and amount of time surfing the Internet. Their studies show that both depression and Internet usage increase and decrease proportionate to each other.

    64. Re:The next line states... by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      OK, let's be technical. Let:

      Then: "internet addicts are more likely than the general population to be depressed" means "the proportion of DA among A is greater than the proportion of D among T", or "DA/A > D/T", which is mathematically equivalent (since all number are positive) to "DA*T > D*A".

      "depressed people could be less likely than the general population to be internet addicts" means "the proportion of DA among D is greater than the proportion of A among T", or "DA/D < A/T", which is equivalent "DA*T < D*A".

      OMG, it's full of win

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    65. Re:The next line states... by zacronos · · Score: 1

      You could indeed conclude that -- but it would not be what you observed in your study. It is my opinion that as scientists, it is our job first to tell others what we have observed directly, and only secondarily to assert "therefore we can conclude X and Y due to Z". If you are not very careful to keep in mind what you have actually observed and what you have not, it becomes very easy to make an incorrect assumption without even realizing. It is a slippery slope when you start skipping over the details -- just like your elementary school math teacher told you, "you have to show your work". ;-)

    66. Re:The next line states... by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      I feel confident that in my case it is the latter. I'll have some periods when I'm really down, and then I usually end up surfing aimlessly for hour upon hour. My gut feeling is that it's to distract my mind, in an effort to avoid thinking about the stuff that gets me down. Not that it helps much...

    67. Re:The next line states... by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      And depression is provably related to imbalances in norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine. I'd love to get a real biologist's take on this research.

      Most people, even those of the enlightened slashdot community, do not understand the biochemistry of depression. It took 5 years of therapy and experimenting with several different anti-anxiety/depression drugs get me out of my 35 years of depression. During that time I gained a significant understanding of all 3 chemicals, and how they affect your thought processes. Long term chronic depression is a physical ailment more than a mental one, and it can be treated.

      Most people only know what goes on in their own minds, and assume that it is just the way life is, the way that a moody geek is supposed to think. They have never experienced the other side, life without all the angst, obsessive-compulsion, anger, feelings of shame and inadequacy. Life is much better on the other side, and I did not lose any geek productivity. The drugs are not without their side effects, however, and the trick is to find the right combination with the minimal side effects that do not affect your chosen lifestyle too badly.

      Let me give a concrete example that people here can relate to. I had to cut up my Civilization III and IV disks after I could not stop playing. Just one more turn would turn into just one more hour, just two more hours, etc., and another day without much sleep. My knees would shake when I thought about playing the game. After remembering my experiences with III, buying IV was like a heroin addict relapse. This time I'll be able to handle it, I thought. I couldn't. Now, with proper meds and understanding of my own mind, I can safely play freeciv for a couple of hours a week, and put it down when I want. And enjoy it a lot more.

      I did see rumors of Civ V, and I felt a little of the old shakes thinking about it. I think I'll get it whenever it comes out, but I'll tell my wife to keep the scissors handy, just in case.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    68. Re:The next line states... by bonniot · · Score: 1

      In general I would agree, if the conclusion is debatable (even if ever so slightly). But if you find more dogs than cats in your neighbourhood, you could as well declare there are less cats than dogs, because it is formally equivalent. The case we are talking about now is actually the same degree of equivalence (I just did the math, it's worth to do it once to convince yourself).

    69. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to modern journalism.

      OMG HEADLINE!

      Titillating content.

      One line note explaining how everything you read was pure speculation on the part of the writer, and that there are no real conclusions to be drawn from the study/events/whatever that the writer tricked you into thinking the article was about.

      By modern, you mean the last 100+ years, right?

      Since linguists consider Modern English to go back to circa 1550, I don't see a problem with the GP's statement at all!

    70. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statements are not statistically equivalent.
      Translation of Statement 2: If you have 100 people in the study, 10% may be depressed. Of those 10 people, 8 may spend more than X hours online. So, 80% of the depressed population spends a lot of time online.

      Translation of Statement 1: You have 100 people in the study, and 25% of them spend a lot of time online. Out of those 25 people, 8 will be depressed (we know that from statement 1). So, 32% of people who spend a lot of time online are also depressed.

      So statement 2 tells you the likelihood of a subject spending lots of time online out of the population of depressed people, and statement 1 tells you the likelihood of being depressed out of the population of people who spend lots of time online. But neither statement implies the other. It is possible that 75 out of 100 people in the overall population spend "a lot of time online", so only one in ten people (8/75) who spend a lot of time online would be likely to be depressed. However, statement 2's results still haven't changed... 8 out of 10 depressed people spend a lot of time online, which is still an impressive (80%) result.

    71. Re:The next line states... by zacronos · · Score: 1

      If you can think of a way to assert correlation such that causation is not a natural inference for most people, and without sounding awkward or explicitly denying the causation you expect people to infer, I would sincerely love to hear it.

      Researchers have found a correlation between levels of depression and amount of time surfing the Internet. Their studies show that both depression and Internet usage increase and decrease proportionate to each other.

      For one thing, you are pushing the bounds of sounding awkward, if you ask me. ;-) But more importantly, you are incorrect about what their studies showed. From TFA: "They ['internet addicts'] also had a higher incidence of moderate to severe depression than normal users." This does not say that those who were the most "internet addicted" were especially likely to be severely depressed, which is what your statement asserts. But even aside from that, it indicates very specifically what information they examined -- the population was "internet addicts", not "people who exhibit signs of depression". This is suggested by the original statement ("People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression."), but was lost in your translation as you tried to make it sound more causation-neutral, and was actually reversed by bonniot's alternate phrasing. That's really the key here -- the difference between reporting what you have directly observed in your study, versus reporting the things you believe to be statistically true based on what you observed in your study. I already went into this in another comment in this thread, so I won't go into it again.

      This whole discussion does a great job of illustrating how difficult it really is for scientists to publish what they observed in their studies without other people inferring incorrect things about how the study was performed, what it means, etc.

    72. Re:The next line states... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      When the summary says:

      People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression

      it suggests causation

      Only if you think correlation suggests causation.

      They took a group of people who spend a lot of time surfing the internet. They took a control group who didn’t. The group who spent a lot of time surfing the internet was also more likely to show signs of depression. They showed correlation. You are the one who assumed it was a causative relationship.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    73. Re:The next line states... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      kthx.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    74. Re:The next line states... by RJHelms · · Score: 1

      You're completely right. It wouldn't be Slashdot if my correction to a comment did not itself require a correction.

      My reply took for granted that we were dealing with cross-sectional data, rather than time-series data. So not an increase for one person, but an increase from person to person across a population.

      By way of a pithy excuse for my sloppy thinking, my background in stats comes from economics; economists love to confuse cross-sectional and time-series data.

    75. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got that beat I watch TV on the Internet on my TV!

    76. Re:The next line states... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Since linguists consider Modern English to go back to circa 1550, I don't see a problem with the GP's statement at all!

      Besides a bit of redundancy, in that case. Unless you believe sexconker intended a comparison with all that incredible journalism that existed before newspapers.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    77. Re:The next line states... by GnuAge · · Score: 1

      Actually, "the serotonin-deficit theory of depression is built on a foundation of tissue paper" This is one reason why SSRI drugs are basically no more effective than placebos for most depressed people.

      Actually, the placebo effect has increased markedly in the U.S. over the last decade, so much so, that if the clinical trials for current anti-depressants had taken place today most of them would not have crossed the "threshold of futility" and been approved for market by the FDA. And quite possibly the reason the placebo effect has increased is because people are being subjected to so much Big Pharma advertisement over the last decade or so since the FDA permitted the industry to market its wares directly to the public. Kinda funny, actually, in an effort to increase sales (and incidentally, hypochondria and anxiety in society at large) the drug companies may have made it much harder for themselves to release new compounds as their patents slowly expire. My heart pumps piss...

    78. Re:The next line states... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I think I'll get it whenever it comes out, but I'll tell my wife to keep the scissors handy, just in case.

      I apologize, but that sentence was just on its knees begging me to take it out of context. ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    79. Re:The next line states... by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Well if you want to be pedantic about it your right. But the word 'depression' is used. Its a general term that covers a wide range of states, from mild dissatisfaction to walking through a school yard with a semi auto. So I stand by my original post and laugh at the stick poking out your mouth.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    80. Re:The next line states... by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Man, I feel like an idiot. I don't know what I was thinking. That's Math 101 and I have a degree in statistics. Pure brain-fart material there. At least I gave you the opportunity to completely own me and feel good about yourself, though. That might help with the depression that you have a higher probability of suffering if you are, like most slashdotters, an "excessive" internet user. ;)

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    81. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on! Thanks for your honesty, and yes, thanks for the opportunity to enjoy rediscovering this simple proof.

    82. Re:The next line states... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Well if you want to be pedantic about it your right. But the word 'depression' is used. Its a general term that covers a wide range of states, from mild dissatisfaction to walking through a school yard with a semi auto. So I stand by my original post and laugh at the stick poking out your mouth.

      Ok I'm pedantic, but moderate to severe depression as shown on the Beck Depression Inventory which was used is not the same as "depresion."

      Further, if the researchers where overeager to inflate the scores of the BDI tests, why didn't that increase show up in the non-internet addicts?

      Guess I'm pedantic, but I'm not going to dismiss research based on someone's misinterpretations of scientific terms.

    83. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if... what if autism causes vaccines!

      I think I might be onto something here, time to call the President of Science

    84. Re:The next line states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The study is a failure if it finds both ends of the argument plausible and no concrete evidence for either.

      No, it is not a failure. It succeeds in saying, "we observed this phenomenon, it's significant, and it might be worth studying further." Science succeeds when it places observations before conclusions; it fails when it does the opposite, as people like you seem to want it to do. Establishing that something exists in the first place is the prerequisite for everything that follows.

      It's common knowledge that depression is the cause. People who are depressed will seek out some kind of 'activity' and obsess over it, as a coping mechanism. Sometimes the 'activity' simply allows them to feel numb instead of depressed, in other cases it allows them to ignore the depression by replacing it with obsession.
      "Studies" like this are commonly "conducted" on activities that carry cultural taboo, or are controversial for whatever reason. You see them conducted on things like drugs, alcohol, sex (taboos) and TV, internet, and video games most of the time. Usually because these types of activities are (socially) considered to be non-worthwhile, providing nothing beyond gratification and therefore "bad".
      They tend to ignore activities like church, reading, social activism, exercise, or anything that is considered (socially) to have some type of social or physical "benefit" to them.
      The idea being, as long as the activity is considered socially "worthwhile" then you SHOULD use that as a coping mechanism.

      In reality, the depressed people simply have different choices of coping mechanisms. Sure, some are going to be better than others at preventing a feedback loop- turning to Meth isn't going to do you any good & make things worse, fast. But someone who turns to reading books as an escape mechanism are still avoiding the problem, and the isolation caused by excessive reading creates a feedback problem as well. Even social activities like church activism can cause feedback loops, despite the outward appearance that the person is socially involved... I witnessed my mother essentially abandon her family, job, and friends, and fall into a heavy cycle of obsessing over church activities. In the end she managed to get over it with a combination of light medication to help prevent the manic/depressive cycle, while undergoing counseling, quit the church and went back to school to be a teacher. These days she's doing great, doesn't take any meds, need a counselor, etc. and has a well-balanced life.

      So yes, the study is a failure... it produced a result which indicates they are asking the wrong question, and instead of realizing that they already have the answer, they assume that they need to ask the same, incorrect question several more times.

      Does the internet make you depressed? No
      Does the internet make depression worse? It can, sometimes.
      Does the internet make depression better? It can, sometimes.

      There you go.

    85. Re:The next line states... by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Well, you'll at least be amused to note that I did not say your message was inaccurate, but rather that the interpretations would be. :-P Believe it or not, I teased out the probable intention in what you said. Really I was accusing you of improper language for Communicating with the Gallery (tm). :-P

      Anyway, have a good one,

      --C

    86. Re:The next line states... by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      I sometimes hook up my computer to my television, then use it to watch internet television... oh God, what's the point of all this.

    87. Re:The next line states... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is that if this wasn't Slashdot, this would get modded Insightful.
      *sigh*

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    88. Re:The next line states... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Here's an anecdotal report from a teen psychiatric patient and hobby neurochemist: absolutely true. SSRI and SNRI make my sexual dysfunction (premature ejaculation and ejaculatory anorgasmia) much worse. They make me lethargic and tired of life. Anti-psychotics turned my anger in debilitating panic and made me impotent. Methylphenidate doesn't have any effect. But benzos (Xanax) fix my anger problems like a magic stick: I'm like a fucking Zen Buddhist. And both amphetamine and weed fix depression, but the white stuff makes me a master fucker, though I'm virgin. As a bonus, the attention deficit goes away. Now I'm thinking of switching to bupropion to replace the amphetamine.
      PS:I pretty much came up with the same theory a year ago.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  4. Maybe confusing cause and effect by mayhem79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe they are confusing cause and effect, if you are depressed, feel lonely, unable to get out of the house. Surely you are more likely to spend your time doing such indoor activies.

    1. Re:Maybe confusing cause and effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that is the case, then it's better to go on the internet, than sit in a chair with a shotgun in your mouth.

    2. Re:Maybe confusing cause and effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you even bothered to read the first two sentences of TFA, you wouldn't have had to make this asinine comment. Thanks for the insight.

    3. Re:Maybe confusing cause and effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make should be the doctor, you get it, the quak doesn't. This isn't even new and has been known for some time now.

    4. Re:Maybe confusing cause and effect by nedlohs · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe you are too stupid to read?

    5. Re:Maybe confusing cause and effect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are confusing cause and effect, if you are depressed, feel lonely, unable to get out of the house.

      In Canada we call that winter.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  5. Well... duh? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Shocking news: depressed people try to escape from reality!

    1. Re:Well... duh? by TomXP411 · · Score: 1

      Heh. That's exactly what I was thinking. "News Flash: Depressed people try to make themselves feel better by - gasp - talking to other people!" Next they'll tell us that the leading cause of death is drinking water. "Everyone I know who's died drinks water or something that has water in it!" someone will say.

    2. Re:Well... duh? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      "Everyone I know who's died drinks water or something that has water in it!" someone will say.

      Everyone you know who's still alive drinks water or something that has water in it, too. What this study found is nothing like that.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Well... duh? by TomXP411 · · Score: 1

      Even the people who did the study aren't claiming the know the causal link: "Excessive internet use is associated with depression, but what we don't know is which comes first."

      Of course, there is obviously a link of some kind between depression and extremely heavy use of chat rooms and social sites. I'll go along with that 100%. In every social site I've spent time on, the heaviest users were also the ones "on meds."

      Of course, their sample is pretty small. If this ratio (15 people out of 1,300) holds true on a large scale, this might be something to add to the warning signs of depression.

      I can just see the doctor's office flyers now: "Do you spend more than 4 hours a day on Facebook? You might just be depressed..."

  6. Cause or effect? by Sefert · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Or depressed people spend more time on the internet. I hate it when they show an effect that could very well be the cause instead. Damn poor study, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Cause or effect? by Sefert · · Score: 1

      Just cause I was unclear, they said in the article "But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it". In other words they learned nothing from the study, except that depressed people do stuff, including surf the internet.

    2. Re:Cause or effect? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      Determining the validity of the correllation depends on how well they controlled for other variables. I've not seen the actual study, so I don't know how they determined the direction of correllation.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    3. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or depressed people spend more time on the internet. I hate it when they show an effect that could very well be the cause instead. Damn poor study, if you ask me.

      I haven't read the original paper, have you?

    4. Re:Cause or effect? by Sefert · · Score: 1

      What bugs me is that they seem to be trying to imply causation. If the depression rates are as high as they say they are (8%, as of a 2004 study), they can find a correlation between depression and virtually any activity involving enough people. Which makes any study that fails to prove causation pretty pointless, I suspect. Except maybe cheer-leading.

    5. Re:Cause or effect? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      If the depression rates are as high as they say they are (8%, as of a 2004 study), they can find a correlation between depression and virtually any activity involving enough people.

      Please explain why this is so, and specifically, why a high depression rate by itself makes it more likely that you will find a correlation with some randomly chosen activity. Show your work.

      Go ahead. I dare you.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      what happens if you stop depressed people from using the Internet

      Unknown. No researcher who tried this has lived to complete the study.

    7. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick one. Any one.

      Better: Oh, I'll go for a walk/run/drive/whatever. And if the computer or internet stops working please don't hesitate to .... fsck off.
      Worse: Ok. Guess I'll shut the curtains and sit in the dark for a few hours then.
      The Same: Time to go to work, to the job you lost three months ago but you're not telling, and end up in the library or internet cafe...

      (Clinical) Depression is a cycle. Cause and effect go hand in hand. And you can be told that and believe that and it doesn't make a scrap of difference because it's the thing that's doing the knowing which is impaired.

      Slow Slashdot/internet. Maybe lots of people looking at this. Maybe not. Nothing matters in the end. Or the beginning. Or any time inbetween.

      That'll be a worse then, _with_ the internet (this time - the mileage will vary. A lot).

      Just spent an hour unplugged. The Same.

      Cause or Effect? Maybe Effect first and then both. I don't matter enough to say, or post under an ID.

    8. Re:Cause or effect? by psithurism · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cause or effect?

      They don't know! Thats what TFA says TWICE! Also why they don't say so in the summary and you need us to get that from the article for you.

      Didn't RTFA

      Thanks for admitting that though, there are long debates going on above where no one has read the article cept for my little addendum comments like this one.

      BTW peoples this article is less than a page long.

    9. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe depressed people are drawn to internet use studies?

    10. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe internet studies cause depression!

    11. Re:Cause or effect? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      what happens if you stop depressed people from using the Internet, do they feel better, worse, or the same?

      Shush, you, that would be actual science!

      But really, I remember the study about people with cats being healthier, and the conclusion that the cats are the cause. I always want to yell at them, "try a group of non-cat people, and assigning half cats, then see whether there's any noticeable health increase in only the cat-assigned ones".

  7. Thats what the internet is for, no? by [000000] · · Score: 0

    more time browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and online communities. What else is on the internet apart from Slashdot?

  8. Other things to think about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear that intelligence is also correlated to depression. In this case, is intelligence correlated to internet addicts? If so, it is quite contrary to our expectations.

  9. Comorbidity by ihatewinXP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the long run this will also be likely linked to Aspergers Syndrome and other dissociative / personality disorders that we are diagnosing with much greater frequency today in that it reduces peoples interactions with actual human beings (at least vs our 'un-evolved' predecessors) to the point where children are not growing up with a firm grasp of social cues in relation to body language, tone of voice, etc....

    Thank Christ I was raised in a time before 4chan....

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Comorbidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Everyone has a mental illness these days.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Comorbidity by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      ...if you don't have some type of mental illness these days, something is seriously wrong with you. Says so, right on the TV ad!

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    3. Re:Comorbidity by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some cases it's not clear that "linked with personality disorders" actually adds any information, because many personality disorders have no etiology or known mechanism and are simply defined clinically as the presence of a certain set of symptoms. So saying that the symptoms are associated with the disorder doesn't tell you anything, because the disorder is defined as having those symptoms. It's like saying being morbidly overweight is linked with clinical obesity.

    4. Re:Comorbidity by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the long run this will also be likely linked to Aspergers Syndrome and other dissociative / personality disorders that we are diagnosing with much greater frequency today in that it reduces peoples interactions with actual human beings (at least vs our 'un-evolved' predecessors) to the point where children are not growing up with a firm grasp of social cues in relation to body language, tone of voice, etc....

      What, so suddenly Asperger's isn't an autism spectrum disorder, ie one that's genetically determined? It's all just social conditioning? Which just need to make sure these children "[grow] up with a firm grasp of social cues"?

      Well that's great news! You should publish a paper!

    5. Re:Comorbidity by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone has a mental illness these days.

      More accurately, there's a mental illness for everyone.

      Personally, I distrust the entire psychiatric profession, and lament that these "professionals" have taken on (usurped?) the traditional roles of grandparent, wise uncle, priest, friend, cool dude down the street who smokes too much pot, etc. Anyone know of any other job where you can ensure meaningful and continued employment by making shit up?

      No doubt there's an illness for people like me, too. Or would it be a disease? What the hell. Disorder, malady, sickness, syndrome ... no wonder everyone's so screwed up. Guess I'll have to start watching those TV commercials more carefully so I know what to ask my doctor to prescribe.

      Sigh. I need to go browse some sexually gratifying websites. Anyone have a link?

    6. Re:Comorbidity by SigILL · · Score: 1

      In the long run this will also be likely linked to Aspergers Syndrome

      Of course, heavy internet use causes Asperger's syndrome and the usual comorbid social anxiety issues, instead of the other way around. How could we have been so stupid back in the 1940's?!

      --
      Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    7. Re:Comorbidity by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      It's called Scientology.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    8. Re:Comorbidity by revboden · · Score: 1

      Aspergers is a syndrome not a disability. Syndrome;1 : a group of signs and symptoms that occur together and characterize a particular abnormality or condition 2 : a set of concurrent things (as emotions or actions) that usually form an identifiable pattern ... I happen to be an Aspie.

    9. Re:Comorbidity by bnenning · · Score: 1

      What, so suddenly Asperger's isn't an autism spectrum disorder, ie one that's genetically determined? It's all just social conditioning? Which just need to make sure these children "[grow] up with a firm grasp of social cues"?

      It's very likely genetic, but there are things society can do. For example, I'd argue that the standard message of "study hard and be responsible" is wrong for children with Asperger's-like personalities. They'd be better off going to parties and getting drunk and building social skills in the process than reading a tenth book on quantum physics, which is what they'd rather do. Although I have no idea how to nudge them toward that while keeping the standard advice for normal kids, for whom it's correct.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    10. Re:Comorbidity by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      That's right. Everything is from bad social conditioning. Back in the day people were just tougher. Grandpa got oral cancer, he just rubbed some dirt on it and shook it off. None of these fancy pants "Procedures" to "Cure" or "Alleviate the excruciating pain". That is for today's generation of whiners.

      Yeah, Grandpa died but he died a MAN. Not someone all "boo hoo doctor, is there anything we can do?"

    11. Re:Comorbidity by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      What, so suddenly Asperger's isn't an autism spectrum disorder, ie one that's genetically determined? It's all just social conditioning?

      I believe that Asperger's is *self* conditioning.

      People just don't want to take responsibility for anything, not even their own personalities. As if their personality problem is something beyond their control and dictated by 'genetic' disorders.

      I call shenanigans.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:Comorbidity by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No doubt there's an illness for people like me, too

      Yeah same here.

      I suffer from an illness that makes me want to tell people to take responsibility for themselves and their behavior and not blame it on some 'genetic' condition or whatever.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    13. Re:Comorbidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disorders that we have become better at diagnosing and are more aware of, are being diagnosed more frequently. Color me surprised.

    14. Re:Comorbidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sour milk, don't forget that. OH, and crop blights, and calves with two heads. The calves with two heads thing is really freaky. Boy, I can't wait to get out my pitchfork and go after that dang blamed Internets thingy for all this here trouble. My boy's just a passel of problems now. can't get him to sit down with me and watch football like a normal kid. He just wants to play with his YouTube like a pansy.

    15. Re:Comorbidity by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I need to go browse some sexually gratifying websites. Anyone have a link?

      How about http://images.google.com/images?q=sexually%20gratifying%20websites

      No doubt there's an illness for people like me, too.

      If you don't feel like there's anything wrong with you, why ask for a diagnosis? OTOH, if you (say) have trouble interpreting non-verbal social cues and intensely focus on a single interest (there's those websites again), but don't have a language impairment (that'd be Asperger's Syndrom, not Kanner's Autism), you may benefit from, say, social skills training and (possibly) a few other things.

      If you can learn those social skills from your grandparents, priest, cool dude on the street, whatever, then good on you.

      FWIW, I was shy as a kid. Really, really shy. I told my mum there was this girl in class I really liked but I was really shy and "what do I do?" Next thing I know, I'm holding our phone in my hand and she's the one being called. I was scared out of my (rather little) wits when she said "$name speaking"; too scared to say anything useful. The only thing it taught me was not to ask for help again, to avoid the horrible stress and anxiety.

      I figure a trained psychologist would've done something more helpful.

      (End of anecdotal evidence)

    16. Re:Comorbidity by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Everyone has a mental illness these days.

      Not I! I am mentally and emotionally perfect, the shining exemplification of mental health. I spend hours looking in the mirror every day, knowing that it's a matter of time until the rest of the world falls in line behind me.

    17. Re:Comorbidity by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      They'd be better off going to parties and getting drunk and building social skills in the process than reading a tenth book on quantum physics, which is what they'd rather do. Although I have no idea how to nudge them toward that while keeping the standard advice for normal kids, for whom it's correct.

      Maybe with a food analogy. If you eat too little, you get sick; if you eat too much you get fat and sick, both are bad so you have to have a balance. I would probably choose to compare partying to overeating, but it would work either way.

    18. Re:Comorbidity by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        I wish I had mod points today, because that's probably the best description of much of modern psychology I've ever seen ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    19. Re:Comorbidity by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup. I'd say that's true in probably 90% of Asperger's cases. (The obvious tell: ask if it's self-diagnosed or not.)

      I work with a woman who is constantly finding new things to be allergic to, similar type of case... it's extremely annoying when having to pick restaurants. The latest one is "gluten-free" foods-- I never heard of gluten 5 years ago, but now it's trendy so she has it.

      "What happens if you accidentally eat gluten?" "Oh I feel bad for awhile." Yah right, crazy. That happens when I eat Taco Bell, but I sure as hell aren't allergic to it.

  10. Is this an on-line community? by karstdiver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I really feel depressed...

    1. Re:Is this an on-line community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *YOU* feel depressed??? I find CowboyNeal sexually gratifying, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Is this an on-line community? by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      Slashdot 2.0 makes me feel depressed too.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    3. Re:Is this an on-line community? by karstdiver · · Score: 1

      I limited my remark to the on-line community aspect because any mention of the real reason for frequenting /. is totally NSFW.

    4. Re:Is this an on-line community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idle.slahdot.org makes me feel depressed. They can't even get the comments there to work properly when it does on the rest of the site, and this is supposedly a geek/nerd site. And lets not mention the content they put there.

  11. Chickens lay eggs by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It takes a chicken to lay a chicken egg.

    So if internet usage is indicative of depression, then it stands to reason that people who are prone to depression (social outcasts for one) would be inordinately engaged in that type of activity. The flow isn't internet leads to depression but rather that depression leads to internet.

    All stereotypes have some basis in reality, so if we consider a significant fraction of internet users to be fat, ugly, borderline autistic, Cheetos and Doritos crunching, Mountain Dew swilling, World of Warcraft playing dweebs who used to get beat up in high school, then we can see how an activity that allows relative anonymity and essentially zero repercussions would attract this type of user. In turn, this type of user would tend towards clinical depression due to their social awkwardness and isolation.

    1. Re:Chickens lay eggs by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'm a fat, ugly, borderline autistic, Cheetos and Doritos crunching, Mountain Dew swilling dweeb who used to get beat up in high school, you insensitive clod! You crossed the line with World of Warcraft!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Chickens lay eggs by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wasn't talking about uh you..

    3. Re:Chickens lay eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All stereotypes have some basis in reality, so if we consider a significant fraction of internet users to be fat, ugly, borderline autistic, Cheetos and Doritos crunching, Mountain Dew swilling, World of Warcraft playing dweebs who used to get beat up in high school, then we can see how an activity that allows relative anonymity and essentially zero repercussions would attract this type of user. In turn, this type of user would tend towards clinical depression due to their social awkwardness and isolation.

      The becomming a "fat, ugly, borderline autistic, Cheetos and Doritos crunching, Mountain Dew swilling, World of Warcraft playing dweeb" is also a result of being a social outcast, not a cause.

      If you don't understand the people around you, and you don't care about them. Then you don't care how they see you. Life just becomes a blur, and the Internet is just a way to pass time. In my case, I couldn't feel emotions, at least, I couldn't feel 80% or so of them. And that makes you socially awkward and an easy target. Your view of the world is totally different from the rest of the people. And on the Internet people don't notice that.

      For me it's all changed now. I don't know how, but it did. It's wierd to turn 26 and notice everything around you is different then you thought it was. It's wierd to fall in love for the first time when you are 25. But I'm glad it happened at all.

    4. Re:Chickens lay eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes something close to a chicken to finally lay the mutated-gene filled egg that can be identified as 'the chicken'.

  12. Browsing habits by malignant_minded · · Score: 1

    These 'internet addicts' spent proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and online communities

    I thought thats all the internet is

  13. I don't know... by Danse · · Score: 1

    Since this study doesn't really show anything conclusive, but only a correlation, it's not really any big deal. On the other hand, there's a lot of information on the Internet, and a lot of it is pretty depressing.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  14. Anti social by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find my internet use helps keep me from having to interact with people face to face or on the phone. I'm all for it!

  15. Another meaningless survey by derek_m · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rather meaningless really. Of the 1319 responses to an online questionaire 1.2% (yes, thats a whole 16 people) were deemed to be "addicts". "Many" of those were deemed to be depressed. Whats that a whole 10 people?

    Noone ever answers these things less than 100% honestly, do they?

    Smells more like they asked their questions, stated the conclusions they were hoping to prove but failed utterly at having the data to back them up.

  16. The internet is depressing? by aldld · · Score: 1

    How can the internet be depressing? There's pictures of people's cats, Slashdot, and porn. Is there anything else that I don't know about?

    1. Re:The internet is depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also pictures of goatse.cx and tubgirl... now THAT'S depressing!

    2. Re:The internet is depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      things like AVGN/TGWTG and all the free tv helps too

    3. Re:The internet is depressing? by Random+Data · · Score: 1

      Slashdot people's cat porn. Now I'm horrified. And depressed.

  17. There could be a link to sleep patterns by HikingStick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see if the study examined sleep patterns of those who use the Internet to a far greater degree than others. Lack of sleep over an extended period of time has been linked to depression in many studies. Thus, the Internet surfing behaviors could be causing the subjects to get less sleep, thereby increasing the likelihood that they experience depression. The validity of the claim will come down to how well the study authors controlled for other variables, the overal validity of their methods, and whether or not other groups can replicate the results.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:There could be a link to sleep patterns by ezbo · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea.

    2. Re:There could be a link to sleep patterns by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, depression can lead to sleep problems, including lying in bed as thoroughly unpleasant thoughts weave in the mind. The best way I've found of dealing with that is to go do something else, which can easily be surfing the net. Further, depression can make people dread the morning, and so not want to go to bed.

      Lack of sleep is very likely involved, but it's going to be hard to find what's cause and what's effect.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  18. Probably the other way round... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like depressed people are more likely to spend time on the Internet.

  19. it could be worse by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    "'internet addicts' spent proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites"

    Think how depressed they would be if they went to websites that weren't "sexually gratifying"!

    1. Re:it could be worse by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      The issue is, those websites are not gratifying. If they were they would go out of business, but in reality business is booming. The benefit is fleeting at best, and porn use generally leads to more porn use. Which is, in and of itself, depressing.

    2. Re:it could be worse by edremy · · Score: 1
      Umm, sexual desire isn't a one time thing, with either porn or a real person. After I've had "personal time" with the wife, I don't lay back and think "Well, that's it for this lifetime"- I expect we'll probably do it again sometime, hopefully soon.

      Well, assuming the basement doesn't flood again, the kids don't get sick, we don't have to work late.... Hmm, perhaps once a lifetime is accurate. Damn, now I'm depressed

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    3. Re:it could be worse by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      Go surf the internet. That should cheer you up.

  20. Cause or effect? by at_slashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't RTFA but this is the quick question that comes to mind when I read about all those studies... Also, what happens if you stop depressed people from using the Internet, do they feel better, worse, or the same?

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  21. Internet Addiction or just enjoy the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the article, so already that disqualifies me to make a comment, but I will anyway.

    In reading the article, I started thinking maybe I was depressed because I frequent those same types of sites listed in the article, with the exception of the sexual ones (as far as you know). I went to webmd and looked up the symptoms of depression. Luckily, I have none of the symptoms of depression and in many ways am just the opposite of those listed.

    However, I spend an awful lot of time on the Internet and, frankly, just enjoy the Internet more than I do interaction with people. Sure, I can go to the pub and throw back a pint or two and that's fun sometimes but I'd almost certainly rather spend that same time hacking away on something on the computer or just browsing for fun.

    So does that make me an Internet addict or does that make everyone else who enjoys personal/social interaction an attention whore?

  22. WARNING: This is British sciene reporting by crazybilly · · Score: 1
    British science reporting is notoriously bad, some would say, incredulously bad.

    And from TFA:

    LONDON - People who spend a lot of time surfing the internet are more likely to show signs of depression, British scientists said on Wednesday.

    Reader be ware.

    1. Re:WARNING: This is British sciene reporting by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's not that our science reporting is bad, it's that our newspapers are awful, full stop.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:WARNING: This is British sciene reporting by digitig · · Score: 1

      Is the International Edition of the International Business Times "British science reporting" in the sense you mean, or are you simply as confused over the difference between "British science-reporting" and "British-science reporting" as you are over the meaning of "incredulously"?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  23. Obligatory by Pikkebaas · · Score: 1

    Correlation, causation, etc. Oh wait, it's even in TFA.

  24. This Just In: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people go to bars and get drunk in order not to face reality
    others use the interweb

    more at 11

  25. Effect not Cause by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Someone that is depressed is more likely to stay home/in the office and surf the internet.

    People that are happy go out, see friends, and do things.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Effect not Cause by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Maybe the converse: People who go out, see friends, do things are happier. People who can't go out, don't have friends, can't do things get depressed. (and yes, "can't" != "don't"; some people don't because they can't, because of physical or psychological handicaps, or because they get too much negative response due to appearance or other problems).

      Or maybe the inverse: people who surf the net and see sexier/wealthier/happier/successful-er people than themselves (and partner (if any)) get depressed at their relatively low status. (Argument previously applied to TV viewing in poorer/rural/developing areas.)

      Or maybe human beings are much more complicated and have many simultaneous reasons for good and bad habits. Just a thought.

  26. Hypothesis to investigate ... by Spectre · · Score: 1

    People unhappy with their relationship status surf for porn ...

    --
    "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
  27. Zetsubo-shita! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm in despair! The internet has left me in despair!

  28. Depression leads to Strong Internet activity? by realsilly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would have to ask, did the scientists test the subjects prior to this study to find out how many had symptoms of depression, or have people in their family that have symptoms of depression before they ever show strong internet activity?

    In our society, with all of the news that is about threats over our heads and the general push to become wealthy, many people are depressed, or show signs of depression. My suspicion is that heavy users of the internet find freedom and more happiness in their internet activity.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Depression leads to Strong Internet activity? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't that 'the world is a bad place' its the exact opposite. People today, participating in studies like this have almost no reason to be depressed, life isn't hard anymore. As such, without anything to focus on and any problems to work through, our brains create problems to deal with.

      The brain has evolved to deal with dangers, we've taken those dangers away and the brain isn't used to dealing with it, so it creates problems for itself.

      Previously it didn't have time to sit around and be moppy, it was more concerned with finding food or not getting killed by something that was actually bad.

      The idea that the world is some how worse today than even a hundred years ago shows a complete disconnection from reality. Life expectancies are longer, not shorter, which completely contradicts the 'the world is bad' idea.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  29. Awareness of the world by ddrueding80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about: Awareness of the world makes people more depressed.

    1. Re:Awareness of the world by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good one.
      Whenever I read the main news headline of the day, I feel like I'm being trolled.
      Then I go back for more then next day.

    2. Re:Awareness of the world by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have undiagnosed masochism.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Awareness of the world by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      Sad but true.

    4. Re:Awareness of the world by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Holy crap is that ever true. All the information age has done is informed me what a freaking mess the human race is.

      Still, the porn's good, I guess. And that amazon thing.

    5. Re:Awareness of the world by psithurism · · Score: 1

      How about: Awareness of the world makes people more depressed.

      True for many, but it doesn't serve as a warning sign. People that live in the world are no more or less depressed than, uh...whatever.

      Internet addiction has now been shown to have a link with depression, something we can use to identify those that need help. Actually useful information there.

    6. Re:Awareness of the world by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      Apparently awareness of fictional worlds makes people more depressed as well http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/index.html Maybe the problem is awareness in general, ignorance is bliss right?

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    7. Re:Awareness of the world by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I think God would've the most depressed soul.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  30. Content-free news by KnownIssues · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm missing the part where this study has produced anything of value.

    "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive use of the internet could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies."

    You could just as easily say with just as much truth, "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive *anything* could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies." But of course, that wouldn't produce anywhere near as much alarm and fear of the Internet.

    1. Re:Content-free news by sohare · · Score: 1

      I'm missing the part where this study has produced anything of value.

      "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive use of the internet could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies."

      You could just as easily say with just as much truth, "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive *anything* could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies." But of course, that wouldn't produce anywhere near as much alarm and fear of the Internet.

      So in order to actually study some sort of phenomenon you need to first have reasonable evidence that said phenomenon really exists. That's what correlation studies sometimes try to address. For instance, in this case maybe the researchers have the hypothesis that the internet can contribute to depression. Certainly if there were not even a correlation between internet use and depression you would not suspect the internet had much if anything to do with depression. This is what separates science from pseudoscience (such as most alternative medicine and things like parapsychology). Pseudoscience almost without fail (a) rarely demonstrates existence and (b) assumes correlation implies causation. Look at something like homeopathy. The general trend in the research is that homeopathic remedies behave exactly like water, yet homeopaths have constructed elaborate and highly implausible mechanisms for how homeopathy might work.

    2. Re:Content-free news by symes · · Score: 1

      I'm missing the part where this study has produced anything of value.

      "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive use of the internet could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies."

      You could just as easily say with just as much truth, "What is clear is that for a small subset of people, excessive *anything* could be a warning signal for depressive tendencies." But of course, that wouldn't produce anywhere near as much alarm and fear of the Internet.

      Well, actually, no. The next logical step from this study would be to conduct a randomised controlled trial such that, in the experimental groups, internet users who are depressed are asked to reduce their use of the internet and go do ther activities. If a robust effect is discovered then the advice that reducing internet use in depressed internet users can help reduce depression is validated to some extent. Which is a whole load better than simply saying to depressed internet users that they go off and take some pills.

      So there is some merit in this study and the researchers are going about some potentially valuable research. The media have blown it up out of proportion, as usual.

    3. Re:Content-free news by KnownIssues · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For instance, in this case maybe the researchers have the hypothesis that the internet can contribute to depression.

      Agreed, but in order to test the hypothesis that the Internet can contribute to depression, you would need to compare these results to the percent of people with addiction as a whole and to percentage of generally addicted people who are depressed. I don't see any of that detail here. If I told you that 1.2% of people who used the Internet were convicted murderers, but failed to mention that 2% of the general population are convicted murderers, would I be right in claiming to have established a correlation between the Internet and murder? The study points out that 1.2% is greater than the .6% of gambling in the UK, but that's not a 1-to-1 comparision, since the study including porn, all forms of gaming, and chat.

      I haven't seen the actual study, so I should refrain from jumping to conlusions about the quality of the study. My issue is more with the way scientific studies are presented by the news and the way the media forces scientists to produce little sound-bite-nuggets to be taken out of context.

    4. Re:Content-free news by Velorium · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I entirely agree.

    5. Re:Content-free news by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I told you that 1.2% of people who used the Internet were convicted murderers, but failed to mention that 2% of the general population are convicted murderers, would I be right in claiming to have established a correlation between the Internet and murder?

      I can't answer that, but I can say that I'm now very scared by the idea that 1 in every 50 people I meet is a convicted murderer.

    6. Re:Content-free news by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the study either, so maybe I'm going to be an idiot here, but...

      What makes you think they're claiming that the Internet contributes to depression? Speaking as somebody who has been depressed (and frankly probably still is more than I admit sometimes), one of the main symptoms of depression is withdrawal from ordinary life. Withdrawal in particular from social contact, which at least in my case actually tends to make the depression worse.

      At the same time, humans are social creatures. We all want to be left alone sometimes, but anybody who claims they legitimately want no social contact is probably just trying to cover for the fact that they don't have any. For me, and probably others, it was always easier to communicate on the Internet, and far more easy to be open with people on the Internet. That's probably doubly true of people who are depressed and who, accurately or not, see all sorts of problems with themselves and their lives and become self-conscious and self-obsessed about them.

      In other words, I doubt they're claiming the Internet causes you to be depressed. Frankly I doubt they're even claiming spending lots of time on the Internet makes it worse. I suspect they're claiming a correlation: Depressed people spend more time online. To me, that's not saying anything new. Of course they do. They're trying to get some degree of social contact that they're otherwise denying themselves. It's actually a good thing, because it means at least they're trying to cope. It only turns bad, in my mind, if they don't manage to fix or get help to fix whatever their underlying problems are.

      But as I said, I didn't read the article. Maybe they really are claiming something else.

      As an aside...

      I don't see any of that detail here. If I told you that 1.2% of people who used the Internet were convicted murderers, but failed to mention that 2% of the general population are convicted murderers, would I be right in claiming to have established a correlation between the Internet and murder?

      I'm no expert, but I believe the answer is yes. You've established a weak negative correlation. Apparently convicted murderers are slightly less likely to use the Internet, if those numbers are accurate. (I assume "people who used the Internet" and "general population" are sufficiently random samples to draw a conclusion from.)

      The problem is that some people assign much more meaning to such a correlation than is worthwhile.

  31. Alternate theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I think the reason I, personally, am depressed is because I'm a heavy internet user and I'm stuck living in FUCKING CENTRAL KENTUCKY.

    I'll grant this isn't a diagnosis applicable to everybody, but it's still worth looking in to.

    1. Re:Alternate theory by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I'm stuck living in FUCKING CENTRAL KENTUCKY.

      You should visit the Creation Museum, it's awesome. Prepare to believe!

    2. Re:Alternate theory by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      No, I think the reason I, personally, am depressed is because I'm a heavy internet user and I'm stuck living in FUCKING CENTRAL KENTUCKY.

      If you don't like where you live feel free to move. You have the whole US to choose from and the whole world if you want to face visa requirements.

  32. work by crsuperman34 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a graphic designer, it is REQUIRED that I sit on the internet 8+ hours a day gathering pdf's, emails, stock photography, free vector files, keeping up with social trends, web design, email design and taking short breaks browsing to 'switch' my mind to the next job. When I get home--by habit gained at the workplace--I check the news... cnn.com, salon.com, washington post and also prone to check facebook. So it is my job requiring me to be online which will eventually make me depressed. Seems that could be a legit argument against your workplace insurance in covering medical bills and could have even further repercussion?

    1. Re:work by edremy · · Score: 1
      Could be worse- one of my first tasks at a previous job was to help a faculty member with a bunch of images for a presentation. His area of research? Body images in magazines like Playboy. Not only did my job involve lots of internet use, but I had to look at porn too.

      It was at a woman's college to boot. I swear I thought I'd be fired in the first week- "Really, honest, this is my job!"

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  33. Binky by proslack · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of an old "Life in Hell" where Binky has a choice between being Smart or Happy.

    --


    Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
  34. Re:so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Romans, at least: Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

  35. Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a horse by SlappyBastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's kinda hard not to be depressed . . . thank you, Internet.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  36. other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be the other way around? Depressed people are more likely to turn to the internet for solace and understanding, or a meaning in their lives?

  37. Maybe they have vitamin D deficiency by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Or some other ailment caused by not getting enough sunlight and fresh air.

    I doubt they are playing wow or surfing porn in a nice sun-lit park.

  38. No kidding. by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    Have you seen what those idiots post on web communities? You'd be depressed about the state of humanity too.

    And no matter how much time I spend correcting these idiots, they keep posting more stupidity. As a result, **of course** I spend a lot of time online.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  39. Obvious by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 4, Funny

    Better informed implies more depressed. End of story.

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    1. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is Bliss .. I never should have read Slashdot today ;)

    2. Re:Obvious by martas · · Score: 1

      h.p. lovecraft would applaud that conclusion:

      The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age. - H.P. Lovecraft

    3. Re:Obvious by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      My sig is from "The Thing on the Doorstep"

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  40. Proof by moteyalpha · · Score: 5, Funny
  41. Check some facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check some facts....

    http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2010/02/the_internet_depres.html

  42. Unavoidable by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've wasted my life.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    1. Re:Unavoidable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more or less than anyone else.

  43. Actual paper is behind paywall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can read the abstract for free.

  44. Correlation is not causation by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    were they getting depressed because of surfing, or were they escaping to surfing because of depression.

    i, for one, know from myself that, at points in my life in which i was severely stressed, depressed or in a waiting period for some event (military service etc), was using computer games heavily as an escape and sedative. that way i was able to relieve some of the stress or depression i had. if you are busy with something, you dont get focused on your depression that much.

    i dont think surfing is much different. if those people werent doing that heavy internet usage, they would probably be starting using mild drugs. internet is much better.

  45. Re:so.. by nick357 · · Score: 1

    Its my theory that thinking "correlation is not causation" causes a person to study statistics.

  46. heavy = weight ? by noddyxoi · · Score: 0

    In the title your use the word heavy, it could be a freudian slip that already provides the answer, has heavy means overweighted, think cartman from southpark playing wow, then correlation does not imply causation and therefore people could be getting depressed of their asses being nailed to a chair.

  47. Internet = high stimulation by strstr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how about: excessive engagement in high stimulating activities such as the Internet, TV and online videogames, that ultimately depletes neurochemicals and at the same time causes a depression when experiencing less stimulating/normal activities? sometimes there really is too much of a good thing.

  48. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's too much truth on the internet. If you're constantly faced with all the harsh realities of the world several inches in front of your face, on a regular basis, you're probably going to get depressed too.

  49. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "These 'internet addicts' spent proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites..."

    Funny, online porn never gets me down.

  50. Scientists suck. by Miv333 · · Score: 0

    Scientist Miv333 says "bleeding is a likely cause of being stabbed" and "cancer is a likely cause of smoking." Some of these scientists today, need to learn some objectiveness.

  51. Re:Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a hor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew the infamous "Mr. Hands" and he was a nice guy. Loved his horses, obviously. Too bad it ended up that way. I'm depressed that the public freaked out over the whole incident.

  52. Circular definition by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    I quite agree. So much of psychology is a matter of circular definitions; which quickly degenerates into psycho-babble that only accentuates the tenuous utility of the psychologists.

    A person is depressed because they spend too much time on their computer; depression is related to computer use; computer use can cause depression; depression is a mental condition that is characterized by the behavior and social interactivity of people who enjoy computer usage; and so on.... Doesn't mean shit, but provides a paycheck to 'professionals' who can't understand why someone else would find C++ fascinating.

    Ignore these people and you'll feel less depressed.

  53. New term just in time for the DSM-V: by bledri · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot Affective Disorder

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    1. Re:New term just in time for the DSM-V: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the ICD10?

  54. This story reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "there are lies, damned lies and statistics"

  55. Internet and TV - I am screwed too by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Internet and TV - I am screwed too.

    I fit this profile uncomfortably close, although my ratio of 'net to TV is about 90/10

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  56. Maybe it's time by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's time to stop visiting Slashdot so much.

  57. Misleading? by bdabautcb · · Score: 0

    Would not this better be stated as 'people with higher instances of moderate to severe depression are more likely to spend time browsing sexually gratifying websites, gaming sites, and online communities'?

    --
    Koalas. They're telepathic. Plus, they control the weather. -Margaret
  58. OK by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    I'm from now on not devoting so much time to the Internet. I'm standing JUST NOW and stopping this whole nonsense of hours-long browsing...

    Who cares, anyway?

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  59. Surprise by srleffler · · Score: 1

    Lonely people are more likely to be depressed and to spend time on the internet, and they spend proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and visiting online communities. No surprise there.

    1. Re:Surprise by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for mod points. I would say it is much more likely that depressed, socially isolated, sexually frustrated people would use the internet as an outlet than it is for using the internet to lead to depression.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  60. Re:Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a hor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's kinda hard not to be depressed . . . thank you, Internet.

    This is the internet. Pics/URL or it didn't happen.

  61. Re:Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a hor by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    There was VIDEO?! Good god. I'm so glad I've never looked at /b/...

  62. Heavy internet use leads to boring jobs... by Drethon · · Score: 1

    I am often bored at work and browse the internet. This means that the internet leads to... wait, what?

  63. Hard to deduce much from this by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    A couple of plausible explanations seem likely:

    a)Low sunlight exposure can lead to vitamin D deficiency. This is not exclusive to internet use, but any indoor activity

    b)It's fairly well documented that a lot of people use the internet as a coping resource. In this case it may even have a protective effect, even though the correlation looks different.

    c)Lack of exercise. Daily exercise is known to help maintain a good mood. In addition a stationary lifestyle could result in obesity, which may in turn result in low confidence and other problems.

    d)Common causes. Some psychological illnesses cause people to withdraw from social interactions. Such people are more likely to spend time online.

    e)Dietary correlations. Would anybody here be surprised if it turns out heavy internet users also often eat pizza and soda to a greater extent than others? I can tell you from personal experience than malnutrition can easily get you depressed rapidly

    Basically there are too many plausible correlations to identify why this occurs. To simply hand-wave it away shouting "correlation is not causation" would not be rational, but there's so many reasons to expect these results that are not fundamentally due to something internet specific that the study seems to be of moderate interest at best.

    1. Re:Hard to deduce much from this by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Or, depressed, socially isolated, sexually frustrated people could be using the internet (the big red source of porn, superficial pseudo-friendships, and semi-anonymous circle-jerks) as an outlet and coping mechanism.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  64. Re:so.. by digitig · · Score: 1

    Well, my (limited) research suggests that the first attested use of that phrase was in the 18th century. So although I'm sure some modern Romans thunk it, but the phrase isn't evidence that the ancient Romans thunk it.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  65. Re:Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a hor by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    I thought everyone had seen that video. That it was the XXXtreme version of Two Girls, One Cup. Hmmm . . .

    I'll start you off soft with a news article, with no pic/vid . . . News item.

    Then we'll ease you up to reax.

    I'm not gonna link to the video itself. It falls under the heading of shit you cannot unsee. Suffice it to say, if you search for the terms "man fucked to death by horse" or "mr hands video" you will find it.

    I remember seeing this video on Joe Rogan's blog (already off to a bad start) where he was talking about Two Girls, One Cup and expressing exasperation that anyone would care after all the vile shit that was posted on the internet way before that.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  66. Cue Correlation = Causation by Mashdar · · Score: 1

    They are correlated, so clearly there is a causal relationship.
    False!

  67. so wrong on so many.. or one.. level by meglon · · Score: 1

    "These 'internet addicts' spent proportionately more time browsing sexually gratifying websites, online gaming sites and online communities..."

    Ok, i know this is full of crap. I mean, this implies there's anything to the web other than "sexually gratifying websites." Give me a break, you can't fool us like that!!

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  68. Not much of a correlation! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Mind Hacks, the author of which was misquoted when the BBC ran the original story, notes:

    This meta-analysis found that there was a statistically reliable link between internet use and depression, but one so small as to be insignificant. In fact, it found that internet was responsible for between 0.02% and 0.03% of total changes in mood (stats geeks: the variance was not reported directly but I calculated it from the r by the coefficient of determination).

    In other words, internet use explains so little of a person's depression that it's irrelevant. It's like knowing that hypothermia is a serious medical condition and that drinking a glass of water reliably lowers the body temperature, but by such a small amount as to be medically unimportant.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  69. Depression linked do heavy Internet use. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I think mine is more likely.

    But hey, the other way around is so much more useful, since it’s supporting the doctrines of the “censor everything we don’t understand” crowd, right? :/

    Also, depression is not a disease. And it never will be. (Buy hey, that’s what you get when you ask “doctors”.)
    It’s a symptom of something. Which itself can be called a disease.

    1. Find all the causes (in case of an active repression, use a really deep therapy). Food, pollution, social stress, genes, etc.
    2. Remove/fix the causes, if possible. Or simulate removal so that it’s the same for the brain. (Start of processing.)
    3. Re-train associations that went haywire as a result of the bad influence. (Re-learning processing.)
    4. ... (Be patient!)
    5. HEALTH!
    Only exception: Genetic diseases which can’t be healed YET (but will be, as soon as gene therapy is usable for it). For those you’d of course need “symptom ignorers” (like painkillers) complete replacements (like artificial hearts, etc).

    Conclusion: Yeah, just keep ignoring the real causes, and find a scapegoat like “teh Intarnetz! OMGWTFBBQ!!!1!one’.

    Sometimes I wonder: When someone would constantly run against a wall, head first, would they blame his headache on the Internet too...?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Depression linked do heavy Internet use. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Step 2: Simulate removal. I'd like to understand this more. Can you elaborate, perhaps with an example?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  70. In other news by forgottenusername · · Score: 1

    People who obsessively perform any activity are generally less than happy and healthy. Depression is often involved!

    "When I get sad I clean my entire house top to bottom then I feel better. I do it 4 times a day"

    "When I get angry I go for a run. Sometimes I run until my body collapses and I fall down twitching covered in vomit and tears"

    "When I don't want to face my life or make choices, I play WoW all day!" --me

    I'm really tired of all the lame ass qualifying and CYA people do. Taking a piss may cause herpies! Drinking mochas may cause intestinal distress! You can't sue us for anything because we said "may"! It leads to such sensationalist, ridiculous articles than seep into your consciousness and waste brain space. Also it leads to poorly typed, all caps emails from my Republican Christian mom about how its "proof the world is ending" and what have you. Exhausting!

  71. Of Course by assertation · · Score: 1

    If you spend all of your time on the internet you will not be spending time on building a life, so when you get off of the computer and see that you have nothing going on you are going to feel depressed.

  72. quoting out of context by elnyka · · Score: 1

    But it is not clear whether the internet causes depression or whether depressed people are drawn to it.

    So, what we have here is an article with no actual basis for conclusions. Nothing to see here, move along

    No, what we have here is a questionable conclusion on a paper, drawn from a line quoted out of context.

    It might not have actual basis for a definite conclusion, but it does have actual data and observations with which to draw relations and directions for further research that might lead to a conclusion (or at least a framework for psychological diagnosis, prevention and treatment.)

    There is a lot see here, move along if you can't see it.

  73. The more I read about this... by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    The more I read about this, the worse it makes me feel.

  74. Re:Depression linked to heavy Internet use. by Faerunner · · Score: 1

    Damnit, beaten.

    Depression is probably more the cause of heavy internet use than the symptom. I know when I'm not feeling up to par I'd rather be online than dealing with the "real world"; I assume others feel the same way. Add to that the number of resources available online (not all good ones, but some very useful, including communities where you can discuss your depression and get help or get advised to see a therapist) and you have a really big draw for people who don't feel capable of dealing with society at any given moment.

  75. Gaming part of "internet use"? by BigSes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I didn't RTFA, but things like this always make me think of gaming as "internet use" and if this would be part of the basis for these studies. People who are hopelessly addicted to playing WoW, Everquest, or even earlier games such as The Realm, often exhibit depressed and anti-social behaviors.

    I knew someone once who was generally quite depressed every single day (albiet not professionally diagnosed), who lived for WoW, nearly 8-10 hours a day (much more on weekends). No matter what degree of persuasion that I tried to give her, she was convinced that WoW was the answer, not the source. I thought it might be helpful to enjoy real life again for a while, and not count on that dependency.

    I also knew someone who played Everquest that, IRL, was clincally diagnosed as depressed and nearly bipolar. I was often told by him that after long bouts of the game, these tendencies would get worse. He would then start to exhibit those behaviors in game, and in the real world.

    With gaming, I think it might be possible that people get depressed because they realize its an addiction, and it makes them depressed upon realizing they have a problem. The cycle then begins and continues on and on. Thats why I think these studies really should include more than browsing before coming to a conclusion.

  76. Re:Once you've seen a guy fucked to death by a hor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh that video... I saw that years ago.. I just didn't realise he died. Given the size of some of the objects I've seen placed in various human orifices during the odd visit to the less reputable areas of the internet I guess that possibility never occurred to me.

    Ah the internet.. such a wonderful tool.

  77. "sexually gratifying websites" by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    Which ones are those? I haven't found any; I've only seen sexually frustrating websites. It's less satisfying than going to a strip club or even just "reading" Playboy.

  78. wow, a lot of misreading by GaimanBohrs · · Score: 1

    The study merely states an interesting coincidence that may be worth studying further. All of a sudden people here are questioning the motives behind the study, whether or not they controlled for signs of depression before heavy internet usage, and getting angry because of this or that... If someone were to do a study to show that heavy internet usage causes depression, then yes, they would have to control for pre-existing signs. This study only shows that these two statistical phenomena match in a statistically significant way. However, then some have countered that there's "nothing to see here" or that this article is useless. Maybe I'm just more interested in how actual research gets done (observation --> testing --> conclusion) instead of what people seem to demand (conclusion --> proof). I got no sense from this that it is an attempt to incite panic or fear of teh interwebs; it is merely an interesting observation that may warrant further study into the causal relationship (if any) between heavy internet usage and depression, or other factors that might lead these two phenomena to correlate.

  79. Re:4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is /B/?

  80. maybe the correlation is wrong by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    perhaps people who are depressed and lonely and bored look to the internet for ways to make themselves feel better. why should this be surprising?

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:maybe the correlation is wrong by Snarf+You · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi, I didn't bother reading any of the 300+ posts above because I'm pretty sure I'm the only one who has come up with the following theory: Could it be that depressed people prefer to surf the internet rather than go out and do social things?

      (<-- runs and hides)

  81. Real cause of depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, I have acquired the evidence to prove my theory that depression is actually caused by being reminded that correlation is not causation every time you read a news summary.

  82. Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I find it strange that an insurance company wanted to cut off a depressed person's benefits once they asked the ISP for their internet log. If they can surf for 12 hours a day they can easily do a job, like typing, for 8 hours a day. No more benefits for you!

  83. Woah, wait a minute. by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1

    So, I've read through the comments on this topic and from what I'm getting is that correlation is NOT causation? Please explain.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  84. Holey research! by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    The research, as reported in TFA, is full of holes.

    As a for instance: is looking at topless models on your pc at the bank considered "internet use"?

    If so, a lot of people spend all day at work engaged in "heavy internet use" (which might be the source of their depression I suppose).

  85. Mom? by leifb · · Score: 1

    Is that you?

  86. I love my internet :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I whole heartedly agree, i was depressed for 17 years before i even got a computer, getting a computer was the best thing that ever happened to me, it was a P.O.S and constantly broke down, which led me to my future in fixing computers and ultimately happiness, instead of constantly trying to figure out ways to "do myself in" i was trying to work out what would be the better graphics card to buy so i could play Devil May Cry :P Being withdrawn and shy also didnt help me, but once i joined certain internet gaming sites and chat rooms i can now handle visitors in the real world, and find i am way more productive now than i was being a zombified drone. As for the sexual content, damn i have never been so horny in my life so surfing porn is a plus :P Yes i am a woman!

  87. not too sad :D by synaptiv · · Score: 1

    I have been suffering from depression since I was a kid, i just turned 42 and the internet has been a big part of my adult life and to be honest the gaming, has helped me with my depression, people around me think I spend too much time on it but to be honest, I find more people I have in common with online than I do in the real world, and that might have had something to do with my depression as a child as well, most of my friends. I dont like to say it werent as tech savvy or bookish as I was and that always made me sad. I play wow, but only maybe about 6 hours to 10 hours a month, I play quakelive more often than other games. and my work is a web developer as well so most of my time is spent online, but i refuse to do meds, I have tried them and was not impressed with the results, If i want to be numb to the world I would go back to drinking. So in all honesty I think when they were researching, that it causes depression I believe they were looking at the wrong question, and getting the wrong answer.

  88. Enough of correlation != causation by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Ok. Ok. We all get that correlation does not imply causation. Please stop saying that now - everybody knows.

  89. typical scientists by Nyder · · Score: 1

    guess they didn't do their do their homework.

    All the internet has done has made people more aware of the crap that goes on in other parts of the world.
    Made it so communication is instant.
    Made it so we don't have to leave our homes anymore.

    But guess what? Just because you hear of stuff more now, doesn't mean it's happening more.

    The reason it may seem like more people are depressed is not because of the internet, it's because more people now understand what depression is, and will do something about it (see a doctor, etc) then before. The stigma associated with it isn't like it used to be. It's okay to see a shrink now, where 20+ years ago it wasn't as much.

    Society isn't getting worse off, what is happening is the crap you didn't know about, or ignored before, is easy to get to now the internet. That's the only difference.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  90. Depression Linked to Heavy Internet Use by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

    In other news, "researchers" with a less Luddite agenda might have drawn the reverse conclusion: depressive people are more likely to heavily use the internet.

    While there are many causes of depression, we can be reasonably sure that the internet is not causing any of it. However, depressive persons suffer from social problems as a result of their disease and those are problems that can be partially compensated by substituting actual face to face activities (that are often difficult for patients suffering from depression) with interaction through the internet.

  91. News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People who spend a lot of time drinking alcohol are more likely to show signs of depression, British scientists said on Wednesday. These 'alcoholics' spent proportionately more time drinking alcohol, Morrison said. They also had a higher incidence of moderate to severe depression than normal users."

  92. I would be an anomaly in this study, then by mykos · · Score: 1

    What the hell? I LOVE my life and I do all the activities described in the summary. Maybe I'm an anomaly, or just a satisfied underachiever. But I think I'm better off than those super-driven guys who almost never achieve happiness.

  93. Oh noes my god i'm liviing a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *BANG*

    LOST CARRIER

  94. Shouldn't have read this.. by Asadullah+Ahmad · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, I have been addicted to Internet and computer for 4 years or so, but contrary to the article I have never been so "tension-free". But after reading this, I got a really bad episode of depression or whatever...

    So could this be Placebo or a reality-check?

  95. Really...? by TigerTails · · Score: 1

    I think it would be more appropriate to say "depression is linked to increased internet use". It makes much more sense. I know MY depression definitely did.

  96. Ooh, ooh, I got this... by ebichete · · Score: 1

    "People who spend a lot of time visiting hospitals are more likely to die shortly thereafter, Slashdot scientists said on Wednesday. These 'hospital visitors' suffered proportionately more illnesses, ailments and injuries, CmdrTaco said. They also had a higher incidence of moderate to fatal conditions than normal people."

    Sigh. I thought the point of research was to discover, inform and enlighten. Not just "research for research's sake".

    - Edward -

  97. On the other hand by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps being informed of what is really going on is the cause of depression.

    I offer this theory: The leading cause of depression is the truth on how the world really works. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer; the criminals have more right sthen the victims, and the corruption just keeps getting worse.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  98. Isn't this common knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have an age old saying in Finland which goes "Tieto lisaa tuskaa.", roughly translated as "Knowledge brings anguish".

  99. Re:Depression linked to heavy Internet use. by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

    Go outside, nerd.