Slashdot Mirror


Disposable Toilet To Change the World

captn ecks writes "A biodegradable and self-sterilizing bag for people of the toilet-disenfranchised world (40% of humankind) to dispose of their bodily waste and turn it into safe fertilizer has been created by a Swedish entrepreneur. It's a dead simple and brilliant solution to a vexing problem. From the article: 'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces. The bag, called the Peepoo, is the brainchild of Anders Wilhelmson, an architect and professor in Stockholm. “Not only is it sanitary,” said Mr. Wilhelmson, who has patented the bag, “they can reuse this to grow crops.”'"

413 comments

  1. When you see it by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll sh*t bricks!

    1. Re:When you see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you'll shit in what looks like a 2L bottle. Then bury it in your field so you can grow more stuff to shit.

    2. Re:When you see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of the circle of life, but I think I'd like more than one element to be in it between me and my feces.

      Vegetables -> Me -> Poop ----|
      ^--text--to-satisfy---spam-filter-|

    3. Re:When you see it by Trails · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the circle of poo!

    4. Re:When you see it by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      No shit?!? You wouldn't shit me, would you? This is some good shit!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:When you see it by tronkel · · Score: 1

      The government could get tax revenue from this idea if they can manage to convert the bag contents to beer instead. Could fund the whole Medicare system

    6. Re:When you see it by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      You'll sh*t bricks!

      It provides building materials, too? Wow!!

      Power to the Peepoo!!

      Built like a shit brick shit house.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    7. Re:When you see it by thomst · · Score: 1

      You'll say, "Why, this is nothing but a bag of shit!"

      --
      Check out my novel.
    8. Re:When you see it by rizzo5 · · Score: 1

      "but it's really good shit..."

  2. PeePoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Shit!

  3. Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in? Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.

  4. The guy creates a brilliant solution... by calibre-not-output · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and goes on to give it a name that five-year-olds everywhere can laugh at until they piss themselves. Presumably that's how he'll collect the urea crystals.

    --
    Nothing lasts forever but the certainty of change.
    1. Re:The guy creates a brilliant solution... by catalina · · Score: 1

      Seems like he got the name backwards - I would guess that "PooPee" would be more recognizable....

    2. Re:The guy creates a brilliant solution... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Five-year-olds. Not grown ups.

      But from the comments I see here, it seems that that is exactly Slashdot’s target group. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Yes but... by fatherjoecode · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...can you use it while driving 90mph?

    1. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAYYY TOO MUCH INFORMATION! But I did laugh for a good ten minutes over the name alone.
      "Pee Poo, where do you want to go today?"

    2. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sure, you could, but you'll activate the flux capacitor about 2 mph before that so it is a mute point.

    3. Re:Yes but... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      ...can you use it while driving 90mph?

      Is that you Lisa Nowak?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Yes but... by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      this is like the third time this week I have seen this. Moot point. M-O-O-T. "Mute" has something to do with the absence of audio

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    5. Re:Yes but... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Thanks to Dr. Brown, at 88mph the excrement travels back in time.

    6. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it travels back in time to not fall it's because it is scared. Don't press him, give it time to get accustomed with the speed and he should eventually get out.

    7. Re:Yes but... by eric-x · · Score: 1

      Just ignore the more on.

    8. Re:Yes but... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      And the odds that any of the misspellers actually know what "moot" means are close to zero.

    9. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moot is teh king of the intarwebz, newfag. Duh!!1|1lolzolol!!

      -Anonymous

    10. Re:Yes but... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      this is like the third time this week I have seen this. Moot point. M-O-O-T. "Mute" has something to do with the absence of audio

      Getting a little hot under the colander eh? ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    11. Re:Yes but... by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      That tagline is pure gold. He should have printed THAT on the bags!

  6. What does a toilet have to do with voting? by spacefrog · · Score: 0, Troll

    Adj. 1. disenfranchised - deprived of the rights of citizenship especially the right to vote; "labor was voiceless"; "disenfrenchised masses took to the streets"

    Although commonly misused, the word doesn't have any other meanings per the dictionary.

    1. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merriam-Webster says you can take your pedantry and shove it up your Peepoo:

      to deprive of a franchise, of a legal right, or of some privilege or immunity; especially : to deprive of the right to vote

    2. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      They're making the statement that if you don't vote you probably live in poverty. Thats all.

    3. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't say disenfranchiesed per se, they said toilet disenfranchised. This playing with the word a bit to create a new definition (i.e., not having something), although not all that new since the actual usage of the word itself--at least in many varieties of English--is far broader than your definition suggests.

    4. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adj. 1. disenfranchised - deprived of the rights of citizenship especially the right to vote; "labor was voiceless"; "disenfrenchised masses took to the streets"

      Although commonly misused, the word doesn't have any other meanings per the dictionary.

      Disenfranchised means to deprive someone of a franchise. A franchise in this case being a right or privilege. It doesn't necessarily have to relate to the rights of a citizen as far as I'm aware, merely the rights someone expects to have.

      I don't understand the disenfrenchised masses taking to the streets though... I would be happy if I was deprived of the French.

    5. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      When you actually understand the English language and use its rules, you quickly see that many words are simply modifiers on a base word. Here we have the base word "Enfranchise" with the addition of a negative modify "dis" and a past tense modifier of "ed".

      The results is Dis*Enfranchise*d. The definition of the word is similarly reflected by modifiers. We take the root word, negate it (as in make it negative or opposite to the original meaning) and also state that the subject it is referring to has already happened (as in the past).

      The definition Enfranchise according to Merriam-Webster is as follows:

      Main Entry: enfranchise
      Pronunciation: \in-fran-chz, en-\
      Function: transitive verb
      Inflected Form(s): enfranchised; enfranchising
      Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French enfranchiss-, stem of enfranchir, from en- + franc free -- more at frank
      Date: 15th century

      1 : to set free (as from slavery)
      2 : to endow with a franchise: as a : to admit to the privileges of a citizen and especially to the right of suffrage b : to admit (a municipality) to political privileges or rights

      Source:
      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enfranchise

      The first definition, "to set free" is simple enough. The second definition is simply one who has received a Franchise (our subject is a group of people after all), so let us examine the definition of Franchise. In essence, it is a right to something. (The etymology of the word is interesting, its base having the meaning "free".)

      So back to analyzing the summary:

      If we assume the summary refers to those people who have no access to a toilet then the definition does match the usage of the word. In addition if you have no alternative other than using a toilet (or perceive no alternative) then the word would be correct in its usage. In either case the word would be correct in usabe bacause the person(s) are certainly not free, they are constrained in either choice or action.

      If we assume the usage is to apply to those who don't *like* toilets and would prefer an alternative then the word is misused.

      I would recommend reading a book of grammar and the rules of the English language before commenting on the meaning of words. I would also recommend that you stop assuming that you know exactly what group of unnamed people a speaker or author refers to.

      I am sure you have heard of the saying about what happens when you assume things. =)

      Here would be some examples of dictionary references to the word Franchise:

      From Merriam-Webster:

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/franchise

      Main Entry: 1franchise
      Pronunciation: \fran-chz\
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from franchir to free, from franc free --
      more at frank Date: 14th century
      1 : freedom or immunity from some burden or restriction vested in a person or group

      2 a : a special privilege granted to an individual or group; especially : the right to be and exercise the powers of a corporation b : a constitutional or statutory right or privilege; especially : the right to vote c (1) : the right or license granted to an individual or group to market a company's goods or services in a particular territory; also : a business granted such a right or license (2) : the territory involved in such a right

      3 a : the right of membership in a professional sports league b : a team and its operating organization having such membership

      From Reference.com:

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/franchise

      franchise /fræntaz/

      -noun
      1. a privilege of a public nature conferr

    6. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I bet you are one of them guys is is for women suffrage, too. Tim S.

    7. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Missing_dc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, who woke up the Grammar Nazi?

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    8. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Funny you'd choose a word with French roots for an English lesson.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    9. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Wow, who woke up the Grammar Nazi?

      The idiot complaining about how the word was used by the editor since it had nothing to do with voting. The one thing that draws the most ire of a grammar Nazi is a grammar Nazi wannabe who "corrects" people for using a word in a perfectly correct manner that, due to the wannabe's own ignorance, they are unfamiliar with.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anarki2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All this is missing is a title page and bibliography.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    11. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1

      The title could have been, "Man wastes 10 minutes of life for trivial reason". =P

    12. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by GasparGMSwordsman · · Score: 1

      I can't take credit for the word choice. If I could have picked the word it would have been Garage. Why? Because in English it means Car Hole... Thank you Moe Syzlak...

      *Walks away before the rotten fruit comes a flyin'*

    13. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Ohrion · · Score: 1

      Parent post and it's grandparent win the internets. That's right, they win ALL of them.

    14. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by harmonise · · Score: 1

      I am sure you have heard of the saying about what happens when you assume things.

      Yes, the saying is: "Assuming is when you make a decision based upon limited information because making no decision at all is not an acceptable course of action."

      We never have all the facts about anything so every action and decision makes assumptions to one degree or another.

      Excellent post, BTW.

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    15. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/francheezie [merriam-webster.com]

              Main Entry: francheezie
              Pronunciation: \fran-chee-z\

      Function: noun
      Etymology: Chicago, from Dis-Dem-Dat, from francheezie, frank-cheeze-yes! Date: 20th century

      1. A hot dog split down the middle , filled with cheese, and then wrapped with bacon. Made best when deep fried.

    16. Re:What does a toilet have to do with voting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have been the smell. Oh wait, the bag would stop that.

  7. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by calibre-not-output · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe he'll donate a bunch of them to the Red Cross? It still needs to be continually supplied in a viable fashion.

    The best solution I can imagine is making deals with local governments... not that they care about the population over there, mind you.

    --
    Nothing lasts forever but the certainty of change.
  8. Youtube Demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...not posted yet!

  9. Great for 1st world situations too... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell, these things would come in quite handy during Mardi Gras when you're on parts of the parade route with no porta-johns.....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, in most places in America, the mere act of whipping out your wang to wizz in public can get you on a certain government list you can't ever get removed from...

    2. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, in most places in America, the mere act of whipping out your wang to wizz in public can get you on a certain government list you can't ever get removed from...

      You mean the infamous No Fly List?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by drcagn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's the case here in New Orleans, too. You can suck off another dude on Bourbon St. during Mardi Gras right in front of a cop, but as soon as you start to piss in an alley, you're going down.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    4. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can suck off another dude on Bourbon St. during Mardi Gras right in front of a cop, but as soon as you start to piss in an alley, you're going down.

      Sounds to me like you're going down in either case...

    5. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can suck off another dude on Bourbon St. during Mardi Gras right in front of a cop, but as soon as you start to piss in an alley, you're going down.

      Hey CmdrTaco, we're not interested in your Mardi Gras adventures.

    6. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like you're going down in either case...

      YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH

    7. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by badran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For that list, you name just needs to sound a certain way.... or if you befriend a certain invisible friend who for some reason has a bad reputation with some people who have a different invisible friend who they think is better, but is actually the same guy (or whatever). It does not make sense, but you have to have faith or you will sent to a special bad place, that exists some where under ground...

    8. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Orbijx · · Score: 1, Funny

      You forgot to put on your sunglasses, but I can still take the cue:
      YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    9. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      This thread is worthless without pics!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse yet, the "unzipped fly" list. Or database, actually.

    11. Re:Great for 1st world situations too... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He actually means the Sex Offender Registry. (well, that's what we call it in Canada)

      Sex Offender - Quite a harsh title for someone that had to take a leak. And you get to share the title with some guy in the news that raped 100 children.

  10. Restocking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And so what do the poor people in $DEVELOPING_COUNTRY do when the initial "complimentary" supply runs out?

    1. Re:Restocking? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      They will wait for the UN/USAID/Gates Foundations of the world to send some more.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    2. Re:Restocking? by bpkiwi · · Score: 1

      They reverse-engineer it and make cheap local copies. Fortunately people in developing countries have realized that IP laws are being pushed by developed nations to retain their economic dominance - and so they ignore them.

    3. Re:Restocking? by BeardedChimp · · Score: 1

      presumably they will be in deep shit...

    4. Re:Restocking? by Sneftel · · Score: 1

      IP laws

      Ba-dum-cshhhh.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    5. Re:Restocking? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      And so what do the poor people in $DEVELOPING_COUNTRY do when the initial "complimentary" supply runs out?

      Use the money available due to the economic growth resulting from the reduced drag from sanitation problems to buy more.

  11. This is quite unfortunate... by vekrander · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad for Nintendo as I hear Peepoo was supposed to be the name of their next gen console. It actually works with their current naming scheme too. Wii (We) Peepoo (People).

    1. Re:This is quite unfortunate... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I thought the next gen console was going to be the WiiDoo?

    2. Re:This is quite unfortunate... by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      WiiDeux in France?

  12. Complex problem, simple solution. by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Occam's Razor at work. Much respect to Mr. Wilhelmson.

    1. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by metamechanical · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A recurring cost revenue model for using the toilet is not exactly what I would call a "simple solution." Especially not for people who can't even afford a toilet today.

      Now proper fecal composting, THAT'S a simple solution... and damned near free, too. Hell, if you do it right, it's not even supposed to smell.

      --
      If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    2. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Pojut · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

      While I agree that a recurring revenue model isn't necessarily the best way, his solution is the best proposed so far, and a relatively inexpensive one at that.

    3. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Lundse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Occam's Razor does not have to do with solutions, it has to do with chosing a hypothesis.

      But yeah, I salute a simple solution. And hope that it also works... :-)

      --
      IAIFARSIJDPOOTV - I Am In Fact A Reality Star; I Just Don't Play One On TV
    4. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by natehoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except you could probably just pour urea crystals into a cesspool and get largely the same effect, without the expense of the bags.

      A single bag is 2-3 cents. Assuming you only use it for feces, you're going to use at least one of these a day. A village of 100 people is going to go through $3 a day in these, and on that kind of money you could feed six of them.

      I'm not saying this is a bad idea, only that it appears to be an overengineered one.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L. Mencken

    6. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're just not looking at the problem the right way. This is a simple solution to the problem of "how to get paid every time a poor person takes a dump". It's the pinnacle of capitalist science, really.. a major achievement. It's all downhill from here, folks. This man has successfully applied the razor and blades model to human existence: free human, $0.02 per poop for the rest of his life. Let no one claim that western civilization never accomplished anything.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    7. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Except you could probably just pour urea crystals into a cesspool and get largely the same effect, without the expense of the bags.

      A single bag is 2-3 cents. Assuming you only use it for feces, you're going to use at least one of these a day. A village of 100 people is going to go through $3 a day in these, and on that kind of money you could feed six of them.

      I'm not saying this is a bad idea, only that it appears to be an overengineered one.

      If they are filling bags with poo, I'd be willing to guess that feeding them is not a problem.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    8. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right:

      If they buy these bags and can still afford food, the bags have solved the problem.

      If they buy these bags and they can no longer afford to eat, the bags have solved the problem.

      Brilliant!

    9. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      So, you don't use toilet paper?

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    10. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      So then we just need larger bags so the bodies can decompose more safely after they die of starvation?

      Hmm, good point. Do they make these in extra-large? That'd be a win-win - in Ethiopia they could use them as body bags, in America we'd have something big enough to use after a curry binge.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    11. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      "pour urea crystals into a cesspool"
      How would you copyright that?

    12. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that water for the toliet and paper are free?

    13. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pour urea crystals into a cesspool"
      How would you copyright that?

      The PeePooDump?

    14. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by metamechanical · · Score: 1

      Early man must have been MIGHTILY constipated if they had to wait for the invention of toilet paper to defecate.

      Really, I think they must have used whatever was available, such as leaves or (Sanitation Forbid!) their hands. Which is really, I think, the larger problem in the areas that this product is targeted to... it would STILL require the use of toilet paper in order to improve sanitation. So if this becomes the norm, it just got $0.02 to $0.03 more expensive to take a crap, for a very marginal (but existing) gain. I haven't done a cost-benefits analysis of the situation, but considering that the alternatives for this step in the process are FREE (just, you know, currently not being done), I don't hold out much hope for the DooSatchel here.

      They probably would have a lot of success, though, if they changed their target market to wealthy Westerner environmentally-over-conscious hikers and survivalists, and raised their price to $0.50 a bag, pledging with every purchase to donate bags to the third world.

      --
      If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    15. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      By finding something that rhymes with cesspool and making a song out of it. Duh.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or just pee in it. Free urea!

    17. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that Occam's Razor does not predict the existance of a simple solution... It only provides a preference given two otherwise equal possibilities. So this would be Occam's razor at work if you were asked "Did this man design a bag you can deficate in prior to burying it, or a giant sub-space-teleporter to send your feces to another planet".

    18. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Hell, if you do it right, it's not even supposed to smell. Excuse me, but my shit doesn't stink, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    19. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that there is another component in urine that actually prevents the decomposition of feces. That could easily be chalked up to "I read it on the Internet, it must be true!" but regardless, you already pee and poop in a cesspool, and if the current levels of urea were sufficient the problem wouldn't exist.

      Since the primary purpose of this bag seem to be to introduce additional urea into the equation, it just seems like the crystals themselves are going to be a lot easier to extract and ship rather than using them to line a bioplastic bag.

      This is an industrialized-nation answer - the real selling point is that no one has to look at feces, it's wrapped in a neat plastic bag. If these work, they should sell like hotcakes for camping.

      Cost inefficiencies aside...

      What kind of additional chemicals are involved in making the bag itself, what will be bag degrade into, and what are the implications on the farmland from the introduction of hundreds of these little gems per person per year?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    20. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      But the problem is getting the waste material to the place where it can be composted/wasted. In large urban slums, that's not so easy, and installing toilets and sewage pipes isn't exactly practical an alternative.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    21. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where , pray tell, might one find a suitably cheap source of urea for throwing after poo in a cesspool?
      Think you might need to get back to the drawing board there, Einstein.

    22. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't you use the inside of the bag to wipe? Or, even better, as an upgrade (for another 2c) have a couple pieces of biodegradable toilet paper attached to the inside of the bag. Come on, use your imagination.

    23. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      This is an ELEGANT and efficent solution. Elegance and efficiency are good. Simple “stupid” is just.. stupid. Especially KISS.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    24. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Never heard of an outhouse?

    25. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with benjamindees.

      You could make a lot of benjamin, indeeds !!

    26. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Especially not for people who can't even afford a toilet today.

      Actually, small recurring costs are much easier for poor people than large one-time expenses. If you have a wad of cash, you spend it on something really important, like your child's school clothing or your mom's medicine, no a toilet that will break and connect to a broken sewer system when you can shit in the backyard sewer for free. These bags are affordable, can be used to make fertilizer, and when you don't have money for them at the moment, you go back to shitting in a hole in the ground, instead of shitting in a hole in the ground staring at a broken, stopped-up toilet that you wasted $40 on.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    27. Re:Complex problem, simple solution. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Early man must have been MIGHTILY constipated if they had to wait for the invention of toilet paper to defecate.

      For early man, 30 was considered a long life, which is what we consider long life too. Oh wait, due to imnprovements in sanitation (among other factors) we live MUCH longer.

      Which is really, I think, the larger problem in the areas that this product is targeted to... it would STILL require the use of toilet paper in order to improve sanitation.

      Yes, because NOT having shit in the streets would have zero impact because people can't wash their hands. I forgot, in your world every thing is all or nothing. Either your sanitary, or you're not.

      if this becomes the norm, it just got $0.02 to $0.03 more expensive to take a crap, for a very marginal (but existing) gain.

      You mean instead of the $0.02 they're ALREADY spending to shit into a bag? Heaven forbid, how will they afford something that costs $0.02, when they are already spending $0.02 on almost the same thing???

      I haven't done a cost-benefits analysis of the situation

      You could at least, you know, read the article so you don't look like a total idiot.

  13. Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    and here I am using a Mountain Dew bottle like a chump.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 3, Funny

      And what about the "burial" part of the concept? Will you bury it under your keyboard, monitor or mousepad? Just asking... because if your raid last really long, it may stink for a while...

    2. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You must have very slim movements.

    3. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Look at the base of the thing in the picture.... I think you've found the main design element for the peepoo.

    4. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention, how the heck do you poop in a bottle in the first place? Thread it up your ass and squeeze? Yowza...

      (given that it would add pressure to the bottle, I can then imagine it all squeezing back out once you removed it from your nether regions too...)

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    5. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      For some reason I read it 'like a chimp' at first... then I thought that would be very strange for a chimp, then I got it.

    6. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (given that it would add pressure to the bottle, I can then imagine it all squeezing back out once you removed it from your nether regions too...)

      If this becomes the new tubgirl I'm going to personally destroy you.

    7. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Yea, the real hardcore raiders use socks. Only casuals use Dew bottles.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    8. Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids. by gamecrusader · · Score: 1

      i can tell you how to shit into a bottle
      funnel and diarea

  14. Don't they even own a shovel? by Hitman_Frost · · Score: 1

    What stops people digging latrines?

    1. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by SmackTheIgnorant · · Score: 1

      This

    2. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by RazorSharp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "What stops people digging latrines?"

      I think you missed the part where it said ". . .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces." The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    3. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by SmackTheIgnorant · · Score: 1

      This

      Well, that was interesting - I wrote something else, previewed it, and the result was the word "This". And now I deny the world the joy which was truly witty.

    4. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by confused+one · · Score: 3, Informative

      He based the idea on an existing observed behaviour. But he's using a bio-degradeable bag instead of a polyethylene bag.

    5. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by zero_out · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet. Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it. I don't know if it's a cultural taboo, or that squatting on the side of the street is believed to be cleaner or easier, but the people just won't use them. I wonder if this bag would be useful in that kind of situation, or if the people just wouldn't use it either.

      Remember, we live in a world where many Africans believe that having intercourse with a virgin will cure HIV. Then there are some cultures that punish women with floggings, execution, or even immolation, for having the audacity to be raped. Men are killed for wearing shorts, and lesbians are raped in an effort to cure them. Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.

      Even if people own a shovel, many simply won't use it because they're too lazy, or too stupid.

    6. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the same urea that's found in piss, something that people tend to do into toilets too?

    7. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the part where it said ". . .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces." The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.

      So they just need to piss on top of it?

      Or get their dogs to do so, as canines produce higher concentrations of urea than humans.

    8. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Urea, hmm were else is that found, hmm.

      Oh I know, urine. All we need to do is get them to shit and piss in the same latrine, or were you thinking they would use a seperate one for each?

    9. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      And there's iron in your blood so why haven't you built a skyscraper from it yet?

    10. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What has that got do to with it?
      Mixed human waste will compost itself, there is not enough iron in my blood to do anything with.

    11. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Remember, we live in a world where many Africans believe that having intercourse with a virgin will cure HIV. Then there are some cultures that punish women with floggings, execution, or even immolation, for having the audacity to be raped. Men are killed for wearing shorts, and lesbians are raped in an effort to cure them.

      Isn't today International Women's Day? You can tell by the feminist organizations' parades in the streets protesting how the fairer sex is treated in other parts of the world.

    12. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by zero_out · · Score: 1, Informative

      Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.

      I meant to say, "...and that the U.S. government faked the 2001 WTC attacks."

      Whether or not the U.S. government caused the attacks is debatable, depending on one's subjective definition of the word "caused," and one's view of culpability. Since I do not want to start an offtopic debate, I am correcting that sentence.

    13. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by zero_out · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the reminder. My wife would be very upset if I didn't bring her flowers today, since it's her culture's version of Mothers' Day.

    14. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:5, Depressing)

    15. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the amount of urea crystals lining the bag is more than the average amount of urea in the urine would provide.

      X may have Y in it but that does not mean that X has sufficient amounts of Y for a specific purpose.

    16. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      she is Russian, ain't she?

    17. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet. Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it.

      What about you? Did you use it?

      Having a super deluxe porta-potty is one thing, but what's often missing with some governments is a regular budget for the recurring maintenance, upkeep, and scheduled cleaning of such porta-potties. Also, let's not forget opening hours, I can't speak for India, but in the West, public toilets are often closed to the public right at the moment they would get their peak usage.

      Also, your emphasis on the luxury of the super porta-potty evokes in me images of corruption (the politician giving the contract to his brother-in-law for instance). That would certainly explain why a country like India would throw away money on such expensive porta-potties in the first place. And unless, you can claim first-hand knowledge of those porta-potties, and can assure me that they're usually clean, open, fully-stocked, and well maintained, I'm just going to assume those porta-potties were super clean during their inauguration, and perhaps super clean when the journalists were around to take photos of them, but that's about it...

    18. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      If you are well-practiced, squatting on the side of the road is indeed likely to be cleaner than using a facility shared with hundreds of people...at least until the side of the road is filled with shit. Many times have I wished to avoid public bathrooms, and would certainly gone in the fresh air if I could feel comfortable. Porta-potties, no matter how fancy, are coffins that are always on the verge of tipping over into a nightmare.

    19. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by HEbGb · · Score: 1

      Shitting in a hole is very sanitary, as long as the hole is not near any drinking water. The poo breaks down pretty readily on its own, and doesn't need any help.

    20. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without russian brides how else would /.ers get married?

    21. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      the only problem with them is that they are hard to defrag and pretty much impossible to securely delete even for a file system expert.

    22. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by lennier · · Score: 1

      (Insert reference to Greg Bear's Blood Music... )

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    23. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or too stupid.

      We prefer the term "knowledge impaired".

    24. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urea is not urine.

    25. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by captn+ecks · · Score: 1

      He based the idea on an existing observed behaviour. But he's using a bio-degradeable bag instead of a polyethylene bag.

      Exactly the point. This is the sort of practical solution that uses extant behavior rather than trying to force change which often fails. An good idea until the local economy affords graduation to composted toilets, etc.

    26. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Have you seen to the toilets in India? And in some places (e.g. Varanasi), the streets are already a hazard for pedestrians due to the all of the shit from the wandering cows. I don't blame people really.

    27. Re:Don't they even own a shovel? by zero_out · · Score: 1

      Since I do not want to start an offtopic debate, I am correcting that sentence.

      Modded "offtopic" for fixing a typo, after recognizing that it may cause an unintended offtopic discussion?

  15. The Humanure Handbook by niko9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Joseph Jenkins --author of the Humanure Handbook-- has been doing this for close to thirty years. His concept also has the benefit of being patent free and simpler. Look see here:http://www.jenkinspublishing.com/humanure.html

    All you need is a 5 gallon bucket, some cover material (rice hulls, sawdust, shredded newspaper, or coffee grounds), and teensy bit of brain power.

    You can get the book on Amazon or download it for free from his site: http://humanurehandbook.com/downloads/Humanure_Handbook_all.pdf

    1. Re:The Humanure Handbook by miltonics · · Score: 1

      There are folks using humnaure principals in Haiti to deal with the lack of sanitation caused by the earthquake.

      If your toilet stops working, where are you going to poo? We spend a lot of energy and effort to process it and even then it still ends up polluting our water.

    2. Re:The Humanure Handbook by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:The Humanure Handbook by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you live, your local wastewater treatment plant may do something similar and sell the results to nearby farms.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:The Humanure Handbook by avagpingham · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a 'flyaway toilet' or a 'helicopter toilet.'... ...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag." The inventor saw a problem and came up with a solution.

    5. Re:The Humanure Handbook by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

      How does this guy think he's gonna make money on something that is patent and cost free? That's just insane! Ideas don't grow on trees, you know?!

    6. Re:The Humanure Handbook by meyekul · · Score: 1

      Great find, now everyone who can't afford a real toilet or the disposable toilet can just jump on their computers and download that PDF for free. I wonder if they have a mailing list..

    7. Re:The Humanure Handbook by hughperkins · · Score: 1

      ... or go exploring in his back-garden shed.

    8. Re:The Humanure Handbook by aqk · · Score: 0

      .....and teensy bit of bran power.

      There- corrected it for ya.

    9. Re:The Humanure Handbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.

      How do you think all the other vegetables are grown ????

  16. cost by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most important factor is cost. It will have to be fantastically cheap to manufacture and distribute this if you want to sell it to people who subsist on $0.10 of rice per day. People who are used to flinging poo out the windows of their shacks will probably be perplexed by the idea of paying to take a dump.

    And yes, I have dodged chamber pots in India. Prepare to be depressed if you ever visit the third world :-/

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:cost by Haoie · · Score: 1

      Not too impossible: Wasn't there like a $1000 car made for the Indian market just some time ago?

      This seems pretty, umm, marketable. As much as toilet paper over leaves, anyway.

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    2. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So what happens to bags of crap they already toss out the window? At some point they have to be cleaned up by someone or you would just have massive mountains of HDPE bags filled with human feces.

    3. Re:cost by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Fertilizer costs money too, and increased crop yields mean more money and food.

      It doesn't have to be free, it just has to pay for itself.

    4. Re:cost by Pojut · · Score: 3, Informative

      From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

    5. Re:cost by niko9 · · Score: 5, Informative

      See my above post. I was in a hurry to write before, but now I have a few minutes to elaborate.

      Using Mr. Jenkin's humanure method, one only needs a small bucket and clean cover material; all things that should be available locally. The humanure toilet can be kept indoors with no smell or chance of spreading any disease. After one year you will have a nice small compost pile that you can use on your food crops. No need to ship in bags or pay any patent royalties.

    6. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This dude lives in a first world country and voluntarily shits in a bucket?
      From the look of the photos on his site he could at least build an outhouse.

    7. Re:cost by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The first-world practice of using clean drinking water to flush their waste away is incredibly wasteful and stupid. In the USA, it accounts for 40% of domestic water use. A slimline toilet cistern is about 4.5L, a litre of treated water costs about a fifth of a cent, so we're already paying nearly as much as one of these bags costs to take a crap, but we're not getting the benefit of the fertilizer.

      Composting toilets for the win ; you paid for all that matter, why not get the benefits from it?

    8. Re:cost by rotide · · Score: 1

      We all shit into buckets every day. Ours just happens to have a drain in it so the shit flows to a facility and they "compost" it. Well, at least they try to make it not harmful. Then they dump it into a body of water, usually.

      This guy just takes out the middle man _and_ uses it to fertilize his garden/yard instead of flushing it down the drain, literally.

      By the way, use your imagination for two seconds. Make a wooden box with a hole cut in the top, put a bucket in it and then put a normal toilet seat+lid on it. Furthermore, put it in your bathroom next to the normal toilet or replace the normal, flushing, toilet with the box.

      The fact that you distill an idea of actually using, to your benefit, the "waste" you don't fully understand, down to a bucket in a yard is the exact reason the idea of doing this is "taboo" and/or third world.

    9. Re:cost by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Informative

      He could, but the bucket option is better.

      By using a bucket, he can easily transport the manure to a compost pile, where it can become something useful. If you build a simple hole-in-the-ground outhouse, you don't get the fertilizer. If you build a composting outhouse (which is a good solution when you have a lot of people, especially if they're squeamish about it), you eventually have to shovel out the contents of said outhouse.

      And yes, I say this as someone who's worked on each of these systems.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:cost by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

      Next time someone offers me their two cents, I may be less likely to accept it ... gives a whole new perspective to some of the shitty ideas I hear disguised as free advice.

    11. Re:cost by ari_j · · Score: 1

      What is the cost of the clean cover material in relation to the cost of these bags?

    12. Re:cost by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever seen third world countries? The DO have "massive mountains of HDPE bags filled with human feces" amongst all the other trash that gets dumped wherever is most convenient to keep away from the rich folks.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    13. Re:cost by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The majority of water used in the US is used for power generation.

      The majority of the remainder is used for agricultural irrigation.

      Tha majority of the remainder, in many places, is used for home irrigation.

      Very little water, as a percentage, is used by indoor plumbing. "Conserving" water by flushing with less is a solution looking for a problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:cost by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      But in India people live on the rubbish dumps and pick up then recycle the plastic bags because they are so poor. We're now expecting them to pay that cost every time they need a dump?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    15. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I tried to avoid any country that lacks proper flush toilets. This means eastern europe countries are about as third world a nation I visit.

    16. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Domestic water use is a tiny tiny amount of water use. What would I get out of this, I live in an apartment?

    17. Re:cost by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The first-world practice of using clean drinking water to flush their waste away is incredibly wasteful and stupid.

      There are over a thousand cubic kilometres of fresh water about 4 km from here. It may be wasteful and stupid, but it is also the cheapest and most economically efficient method available.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      He has to carry his feces around in a bucket, it is taboo because it is nasty as hell. He could at least build a latrine.

    19. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am betting a far better solution would be to trap some greywater from my daily shower and use that to flush the toilet.

    20. Re:cost by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Eastern Europe is technically the "second world."

      • First world: Democratic Capitalism (the US and its allies)
      • Second world: Stalinist Communism (the USSR and its allies)
      • Third world: Unallied countries (because they were so far behind, nobody wanted to go near them)

      Though the Second world never matched the First world's wealth, it did at least have schools, plumbing, and the basics of modern life. In the Third world, even today, a simple stroll around town will have you walking over waist-deep piles of trash and shit... so be nice to your Bangalore colleagues. They have real problems to deal with in their lives.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    21. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Because if you know anything about sustainable agriculture, you'd realise that we MUST close the cycle here. Extracting vast quantities of nutrients from the soil, shipping most of that food to cities, and shitting them into the ocean is a really good way to wreck your agricultural land, produce fewer and fewer crops each year, and the crops you do get will be far inferior nutritionally to the ones you grew in the beginning.

      You don't need to shit in a bucket (though that's a good, cheap way to get started composting). What you absolutely do need to do is safely compost human "waste" and return the nutrients from the food you just ate to the soil it came from (minus some which are stored in your body).

      If it seems like a far away calamity that doesn't matter, consider the fact that most of our crops can only be grown in the quantities they are today with huge quantities of fertiliser (and more each year). What those fertilisers don't replace are the scores of trace minerals that aren't "essential" for those plants to grow. Given that disease and mortality rates have been plotted fairly well against soil fertility (when the foods eaten were drawn from the same area), this isn't just a question of whether we can do this indefinitely. It's a question of our health, right here and now.

      You'd have thought we'd have the basics covered by now. But so far we've built our advanced technological society on a very shaky foundation. Sustainable farming is far more important than solar panels and electric cars. After all, you won't drive them very far if your starving or sickly.

    22. Re:cost by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Same problem as the hole-in-the-ground outhouse: no fertilizer.

      Your mistake is thinking that the goal is only to get the shit away from your home as quickly as possible with minimum effort. It's not: the other goal is to turn that shit into something useful.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    23. Re:cost by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's an obsolete definition.

      IIRC today the definitions are:

      First world: developed world (USA, Canada, Japan, Western Europe, Australia, perhaps S. Korea, Chili etc).

      Second world: developing world (Russia, China, India, S. Africa, Turkey, Brazil etc)

      Third world: undeveloped world (most of Africa and S. America)

      Forth world (not universally accepted-by philosophical reds anyhow): Undeveloped and politically broken so as to prevent development (Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Cuba etc).

      Basically the first world stays the same.

      The pragmatic members of the former second world stay there (and a few, the Baltic states in particular, can claim to have graduated to first world status) joined by many 'unaligned nations'.

      Third world is still fucked, but now unaligned nations that are pulling themselves together (e.g. India) are grouped 2nd.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    24. Re:cost by aqk · · Score: 0

      No more tossing out of the window! That is now forbidden.
      The bags are to be kept in the hallway, where, with a bit of water and some overhead fluorescents,
      a successful grow-op may be established!

      It's already working quite successfully in British Columbia, so I hear....

    25. Re:cost by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Without catching cholera when everybody is doing it.

      BTW they often use sludge from sewage treatment as...wait for it...fertilizer. Generally on crops not for human consumption.

      Not everyone has room for a garden in the first place.

      Especially those who live in high density housing near public transport (as the minders of other peoples business like to tell us we should).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    26. Re:cost by aqk · · Score: 0

      Hey, dude-
      MINIMALISM!
      It's the new ethic. Like, it's in the bag, man!

    27. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

      Now if you could sell a bag with poo in it for 5 cents you could make money distributing and collecting them from a shopping cart.

    28. Re:cost by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      Grow food on your balcony.

    29. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adults are generally mature and responsible enough to do many things and solve many problems that would be too unpleasant or difficult for a child.

  17. Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution. It's hardly going to "save the world".

    What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system? It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it? Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.

    1. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?

      Corruption.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?

      A couple of issues: First is often water supply. If you don't have a reasonable water supply, it's hard to build a complex sewer system which relies on water flow. If you're trying to compost things, that's a bit easier in this respect but this leads to the other major problem: Civil planning and infrastructure. It's pretty easy to make a composting toilet / latrine / whatever for low population density places. It's hard to do so for shanty towns which tend to have a high population density and very low ability to plan major projects.

      You just don't build a sewer system. It takes lots of planning - remember shit flows downhill. You really, really want the downhill to be the correct one. It doesn't work if a bunch of squatters starts digging a hole to dump their waste on the next group of squatters. You need engineers, surveyors, the ability to determine property lines, etc.

      Certainly this isn't rocket science and if the local warlords quit trying to rape the countryside for their own gains all of the time, you could imagine it getting done, but it just doesn't seem to happen much. Functioning civil governance is often taken for granted. It shouldn't be.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by md65536 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?

      Way to wait till someone invents a simple solution, to come up with an even simpler solution!

      Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat. Why don't they just eat cake?

      "Why don't they just" is a good solution to having the poor pull themselves up out of poverty by their bootstraps, but there are a lot of interrelated problems keeping them down, that need to be solved first (or simultaneously) in order to allow building infrastructure to pay off. It's worth trying to tackle, I think, but I also think that a few thousand dollars worth of bags that turn disease-producing waste into fertilizer would go a LOT further than the same money spent on heavy diesel equipment.

      Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer system, and if it's not feasible here it certainly isn't in rural parts of the third world. A sewer system isn't a solution for all parts of the world.

    4. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      Labor shortage not so much, but roving gangs of rifle armed religious fanatics, well... that's something the Roman's never had to deal with

    5. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's a nice toilet you've got there. I wish *I* had a toilet. You'd better not step out of your shack, it'd be a shame if somebody were to take it from you...

    6. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The issues generally depend on who is in power. Not all politicians are in it for the betterment of the country, but rather themselves. Building a sewer system and anything else were a whole lot easier when Slave Labour was around, but now a third world country has to follow the first world example and abolish slavery - meaning that you can't simply feed a man and expect him to work 18 hours of the day. The Pyramids weren't built in a day. Nor a week, nor a month nor a year. Great Pharoahs basically spent their entire lives building monuments to themselves. The Colleseum took years to complete with labour in the hundreds of thousands.

      So lets suppose you can get hundreds of thousands of people on board to build a sewer system across your Third world City. How are you going to pay them? Money won't do them much good if there is no food. Where's all the food going? Well you feed the top down to the bottom. Politicians first, then their secretaries, and so on and so forth. By the time it reaches the labour pool there is hardly any remaining. This wasn't an issue thousands of years ago because all the major population centers were built around sectors of lush farmlands. Egypt was the breadbasket for many years because of the Nile. You'll notice they are still doing pretty well, all things considered. They also sent large amounts of their population abroad, in armies, to use the food of other nations. Could you imagine doing that today? Like say Ethiopia forming a military, and sending it to Egypt - what kind of disbalance that would cause?

      The whole "Build a sewer system" is much more complicated than people realize. Yes - you can lay the statement that Romans had running water in times that predate the common era. I can just as easily say that European Colonies did not for over a hundred years. Wheres the Aquaducts?

    7. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by josteos · · Score: 1

      Without religious fanatics how do you feed the lions ?

      --
      Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    8. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Conchobair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes, let's have them build a functional and self maintaing sewer system and let them eat cake too while we're at it.

      First thing I thought of when I read this was the images of a poop covered beach in Liberia I saw in the Vice Guide to Liberia. Watching that it’s hard to understand how things got so bad, but there is so much that needs fixed there. This is a nice simple solution that could help. I really think if you bring in a bunch of equipment and money, it either going to get stolen or misappropriated. It's hard enough to keep the peace let alone embark on a solid construction project.

    9. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by lehphyro · · Score: 1

      Because they are working hard for people in the developed world. You know, someone has to do the dirty jobs you no longer want to do. Or they are being explored in every possible way by rich people. Who knows?

    10. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      They DO have rocks... and pipes. And rural places have septic tanks generally. But that has to density rather than anything else. They are dense enough in the places they are talking about.

    11. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by wintercolby · · Score: 1

      And you think they'd have the funds to purchase diesel? What about the infrastructure to supply it? I agree with you about the need for sanitation, but you're also missing the point that modern plumbing didn't come about until the 19th century. While I seriously doubt that it would take sanitation engineers for every site, one would have to find people who work with septic systems regularly that were willing to volunteer to either teach what they know or work where they're needed.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    12. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?

      That's kind of like asking why doesn't the USA build a telecommunication system.

      There's certainly room for government direction, funding, and oversight... But you aren't talking about a single place where you have to lay a few pipes. We're talking about an assortment of cities, towns, and villages... Each with their own local governments... Each with their own unique geography...

      I'm sure some places in Kenya have a sewer system. But I'll tell you right now there are places in the USA that don't have a sewer system yet.

      It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?

      Neither labor nor know-how are generally the problem.

      Generally the problem is a lack of funds and/or interest to build and maintain the system.

      Imagine trying to convince someone in rural Minnesota, who's never owned a computer or done anything on the Internet, that they really ought to chip in some money with their neighbors to run a big ol' fiber-optic cable out to their town; so that they can all have blazing fast Internet connections.

      Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.

      Generally speaking, more debt is the last thing these countries need.

      It's hardly going to "save the world".

      Public sanitation, or lack there-of, is a huge issue - everywhere.

      Contaminated water is a fantastic way to transmit disease.

      One of the first concerns after any major disaster is to establish a supply of clean water. That's why you always see the huge crates of bottled water, and the tanker trucks, and everything else.

      If you can contain and/or properly treat this human waste, instead of leaving it to contaminate the water and spread disease, you are certainly taking steps in the right direction.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    13. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by borkus · · Score: 1

      Actually, decent sewer systems are a lot more recent that that. Romans only had sewer systems in large cities. European royalty still died of cholera in the 19th century and the US had a cholera epidemic as late as 1910. So effective modern water treatment and sewerage has only been around since the early 20th century.

      First hand, I own a 19th house in a medium sized city on the US east coast. Built on the edge of town in 1855, it had an outhouse until the early 1920s.

    14. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by tftp · · Score: 1

      And rural places have septic tanks generally.

      That is true. But it's not cheap to build such a system. You often need lots of land for the leech field, half a mile of various pipes, and the concrete tank, all underground. And you need the plumbing in the house. If you were to build a new septic system today, you probably need $50-100K to do that (not counting permits.)

    15. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --shit flows downhill--
      This is also true of the workplace.

      insightful +2

    16. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Without religious fanatics how do you feed the lions ?

      Hmmm... perhaps there's a problem with the religious fanatic population. Man, you try to eliminate one pest and the whole ecosystem gets messed up.

    17. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Simulant · · Score: 1

      ...the Romans did it over 2000 years ago...but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?

      You're thinking of slave labor, and yes, there is a slave labor shortage in most countries.

    18. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Romans had similar-worse literacy rates too so it isn't education. But they had water or coal power available to a larger percentage of the population. They had more roads than many of the poorest countries today. People within rome starved less. That was more likely due to the fact that they taxed every country around them.

      I think in the end it has to do with culture, good governance and trade.

      Rome made much of its money through trade. Currently since africa et al are at the bottom of the food chain they have no bargaining chips WTO then allows rich countries to fuck them over. This is a really big deal. If the WTO weren't pretty much evil we would see a big change in africa fairly rapidly. Corruption would be rampant but it would be in a position where that could change.

      The government in rome was corrupt. BUT it was stable. And it was smart. When you are running an empire and want to hold onto that position you have to be smart. When you run a shithole it doesn't matter if you are smart or not. The government in rome passed laws to keep farmers from starving to death which seems sensible. Doubt that would happen in many african countries.

      Lastly culture, Rome was a place of thinkers. Sure many of the leaders didn't like the senate or the philosophers, even executed them on occasion. But they were answerable to them to some degree. And it was a culture that cared for innovation to be certain. Power was shown through marvels such as the aquaducts. Power in africa is shown through slaughtering a village. Which isn't as productive. They had slaves and yet people were more equal then compared to present day shitholes...

      Really though the main problem is probably stability, 2nd would be trade. Kinda sad when you think of all the political overthrowing that the US and others have done. Would have been better to leave a dictator in that kills a bunch of political enemies than to repeatedly destabilize the country. Yes, I realize how horrible that sounds. But in the case of a countries like Iraq... or Lebanon or Iran (assassination) or Libya (bombing) it has proven to not help at all. And certainly not served to lower the death toll. In some countries (iran, n. korea, lebanon(israeli pov)) I think working to reduce stability is done purposefully to keep 'enemies' from becoming stable enough to be a threat.

      If you want to fix 3rd world countries then you have to support (not undermine) the rule of law EVEN if you disagree with it. Isn't that what sovreignty is all about? Do w/e increases stability. From there OPEN trade! Talk to them. Have conditions... ones that they can actually meet. Free trade if you give up sharia law or some such is meaningless talk. Follow through with agreements (don't repeat what happened screwing over north korea). Small things like... hold elections without assassinating political opponents and we'll drop tarrifs 5%. Lower tarrifs to countries that get litteracy over 35%. So on. I doubt greed would allow this to happen, lattes and big screen tvs outrank lives when they are many km away. But that is what it takes to get sewage systems, not just rocks sadly.

    19. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No way. A septic system is installed for 10k-20k, this is still commonly done for new homes in the USA and these houses often do not cost 100k total.

    20. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer system

      Good point.

      I live commuting distance from Washington D.C. there is no sewer system in my neighborhood.

      We pump water out of a hole drilled in the ground and put it back into a pit in the yard.

      Call it recycling.

    21. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by tftp · · Score: 1

      No way. A septic system is installed for 10k-20k

      Perhaps, it depends on whether you use machines or not. If the leech field is on a hillside the labor will cost you extra.

      As a reference, Able charges about $1,300 just to pump and inspect the tank, and I have a bill to prove it. I doubt they will install a new system for anything less than $50K.

    22. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Currently since africa et al are at the bottom of the food chain they have no bargaining chips WTO then allows rich countries to fuck them over.

      While clearly Western countries have a lot of agricultural price supports, it is unclear that developing countries are getting "fucked over" by the WTO in terms of any other products.

      What we do know is that Sub-Saharan Africa has incredibly low levels of Economic Freedom. Some of the lowest ranked countries in Economic Freedom include: Zimbabwe, Eritrea, D.R. Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Togo, Chad, Burundi, Chad, Lesotho, Angola, C.A.R., Equatorial Guinea. These all fall into the Economically "repressed" category.

      For example, look at Angola:

      Pervasive corruption and a lack of institutional capacity continue to undermine the implementation of other important reform policies. Angola scores poorly in most of the 10 economic freedoms. Monetary stability remains fragile, regulation chokes private business investment, and the judiciary is politically influenced. Inconsistent and confusing regulations make entrepreneurial activity costly and difficult. Despite the government's plan to diversify its economic base away from oil and diamonds, progress in stimulating the development of the non-oil private sector has been sluggish. Monopolies and quasi-monopolies still dominate the leading sectors of the economy.

      and speaking of trade:

      Angola's weighted average tariff rate was 7.3 percent in 2008. Despite progress in trade reform, restrictions on some imports, variable and high customs fees and taxes, import licensing, government import authorizations, the regulatory environment, non-transparent government procurement, subsidies, inadequate customs capacity, and issues involving enforcement of intellectual property rights add to the cost of trade.

      compare with the USA:

      The weighted average U.S. tariff rate was 1.5 percent in 2008. Anti-dumping and countervailing duties, domestic preferences in government procurement, high out-of-quota tariffs, services market access restrictions, import licensing, restrictive labeling and standards, and export-promotion programs and subsidies add to the cost of trade.

    23. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      As a reference, Able charges about $1,300 just to pump and inspect the tank, and I have a bill to prove it. I doubt they will install a new system for anything less than $50K.

      Installing a new tank doesn't involve disposing of a thousand or so gallons of hazardous waste (which, unsurprisingly, is not cheap).

      My septic installation cost about $9K 15 years ago. My father-in-law had one installed about 4 years ago for less than $12K.

    24. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flush_toilet#History circa 26th century BC: Flush toilets were first used in the Indus Valley Civilization. The cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro had a flush toilet in almost every house, attached to a sophisticated sewage system. [2]

    25. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by xous · · Score: 1

      Hi, There ours was installed for 15k and we get it pumped semiannually for $60/visit.

    26. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by tftp · · Score: 1

      I guess it varies, depending on location. The area I live in is not very cheap. But otherwise you got a great deal!

    27. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      You often need lots of land for the leech field, half a mile of various pipes, and the concrete tank, all underground. And you need the plumbing in the house. If you were to build a new septic system today, you probably need $50-100K to do that (not counting permits.)

      Exaggerate much?

    28. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus water privatization. It doesn't pay to save water when you're selling it.

    29. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?

      You have to feed and clothe the workers, either directly or by paying them enough. The Romans did it by using their armies to build stuff when they weren't fighting.

    30. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat. Why don't they just eat cake?

      I think it was a rhetorical question as the obvious answer is corruption.

    31. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, i'm Kenyan. We have more urgent needs than building a real sewer system. I agree it,s not rocket science, and i agree the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using noth.............. We have to feed hungry people, resettle displaced people, give medication, take care of maternal health.......the list is endless before we think of real sewer system. But with time we will do it all. I know we will!!

    32. Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution. It's hardly going to "save the world".

      What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system? It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years .

      human beings are the only animals to knowingly shit in their drinking water. What did the romans do - set the world up on a 2000 year obsession in wasteful uses of water engergy and a shameful lack of respect for the nutrient value in our deposits. Dry sanitation is the advanced way. Shit smells because it comes from an anaerobic environment - our bowels. Then we put in another like system - water.. God gave us two holes for a reason - it is not supposed to be mixed and he would have given us gills if shitting in water was the ideal... We all need to get over flushing toilets as a solution. It is no solution, just a transport system to move the shit from where it is laid to somewhere else where most people don't have to think about it.

      A simple thought - if we cant look after our own shit, how are we going to start looking after others?

      i am just waiting for my registration to come through.

      Hamish Skermer from Australia/ uk / Norway / world

  18. Not, Bad, but... by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 1

    It's a pretty good idea, and one people have been tying to get right for a while, but dude - what's with the name? How is anyone ever going to take you seriously? Nobody wants to see "4,768 Peepoo's" on an invoice.

  19. “they can reuse this to grow crops.”' by BigDXLT · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Fat Bastard: "I don't remember planting any corn!"

  20. Already exists by frist · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.thepett.com/ http://www.thepett.com/index.php?PageLayout=PRODUCTS&pageID=95 Too late. These are already in use. The "poo powder" is some kind of fungus that reacts w/the heat and liquid and gives off gas that kills the bacteria, so you can toss the bag in a trash can, landfill etc.

    1. Re:Already exists by pz · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.thepett.com/
      http://www.thepett.com/index.php?PageLayout=PRODUCTS&pageID=95

      Too late. These are already in use. The "poo powder" is some kind of fungus that reacts w/the heat and liquid and gives off gas that kills the bacteria, so you can toss the bag in a trash can, landfill etc.

      If you read the article (I know, I know) the Pee-Poo was designed to fit within the existing habits of some of the developing world where people already use plasic bags to dispose of their excrement, tossing it into open spaces. A standing toilet (like The Pett) would require more room and a change in behavior. The Pee-Poo just means buying special-purpose plastic bags, with the side benefit that (a) the waste is sterlized, and (b) it potentially can be reused as fertilizer if the community can organize and plan at those sorts of timescales. I'd be interested to see what sort of testing they did to ensure that these bags do, in fact, sterilize their contents. The Pee-Poo article was short on that detail.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  21. That will go over real well. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I can just see the buzz on the street now... "they want me to pay every time I poop..."

    I predict 0 adoption.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:That will go over real well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is being sold to people who already buy plastic bags to poop into. They are already paying for it. And the price is supposed to be the same.

  22. Hmmm.... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    This must be the famous Sack of Shit I keep hearing about.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 0

      One wonders if it will come in 5LB and 10LB varieties. Imagine if you had to take a 10 pound shit but only had a 5 pound bag available...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Mantis8 · · Score: 2

      The article is incorrect as to the inventor. The real person is Jack Schitt, which brings us to the real question, who is Jack Schitt?

      The lineage is finally revealed! Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says: "You don't know Jack Schitt."
      Now you can intellectually handle the situation:

      Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt.
      They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The Deeply religious couple produced six children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Giva Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt.

      Against her parents objection, Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married for 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later remarried Ted Sherlock and, because her kids were still living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Shitt Sherlock.

      Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt and they produced a son of nervous disposition, Chicken Schitt.

      Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens Wedding. The Schitt-Happens children were Daawg, Byrd, Horace and Bull. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt.

      So now when someone says "You don't know Jack Schitt", You can correct them!

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, that'd be me (according to my ex-wife).

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a brilliant marketing idea: label them as "Shit Bags" (when empty), with color changing ink to say "Sack of Shit" (when full).

    5. Re:Hmmm.... by Hillgiant · · Score: 0

      Sadly, there seem to be more Worthless Sacks of Shit.

      --
      -
    6. Re:Hmmm.... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Now that's one Bag of Crap I don't want from Woot.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  23. I think it's a nice solution by cyberzephyr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.

    That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.

    It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:I think it's a nice solution by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't mention how long it takes this bag to bio-degrade; when crops need fertilizer, they need it _right now_, not in a year or two after some biodegradable plastic falls apart. TFA also mostly talks about using this bag in urban areas with no sanitation facilities; it doesn't really seem to be about farming.

      Anyway, people have been using human waste as fertilizer for literally thousands of years. Ever heard of a honey wagon?

    2. Re:I think it's a nice solution by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.

      That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.

      It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.

      Except that using human waste for fertilizer is actually pretty dangerous, unless you do it extremely carefully.

  24. Peepoo? by dcmoebius · · Score: 1

    It's a bit on the nose, isn't it?

  25. If you don't have a place to shit... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    If you don't have a place to shit, you probably can't vote, either.

    So there ya go!

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  26. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Saying that "don't worth a crap" gives a hint of how much it should cost to think that it could change the world.

  27. Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by ravenscar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see a corporate model that allows these items to be sold to the hiker/camper crowd in the first world with revenue for those sales being used to donate the bags to places with a need. For example, I could easily see the Seattle area yuppie hiker crowd paying $10 for three bags at REI. Let's say it costs $5 to produce, package, import, market, and retail these bags. $4 of the remaining $5 could be used to produce more bags and donate them to international aid organizations.

    1. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a hiker/camper and maybe even a young urban professional, I own an entrenchment tool and I will not be crapping in a bag.

    2. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      Speaking as another hiker/camper/climber/yuppie, the idea that you are going to leave poorly covered piles of unsanitized excrement in the same areas others choose to hike/camp/climb, just because you either don't want to spend a few bucks on an environmentally sound product or feel you are above crapping in a bag, is ri-goddamn-diculous.

      Someone comes up with a cheap way to make your shit literally not stink (figuratively, anyway), and you aren't going to buy it? Turn in your yuppie ID card. And don't take yourself so seriously - you'll never get out of this alive, anyway.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    3. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by guyfawkes-11-5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      some places are determined to be so sensitive that you are required to really "leave no trace" pack it all out with you. using something along the lines of this: http://www.davidlnelson.md/ElCapitan/DefinitionPoopTube.htm Big Wall climbers use similar things as well. Yuppie hikers-- not so much.

    4. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be used today in Haiti and Chile' or any disaster torn area. Government's should buy these by the truck load.

    5. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a third hiker/camper, if you that much of an issue with randomly scattered poo, I'd recommend you stay away from anywhere containing wildlife.

      Anywhere that has a high enough concentration of humans to cause an issue either needs to provide facilities, or require that everything packed in is packed back out (including poo). Interestingly, even the places I've been that required strict "low impact" practices didn't require you to do anything more than the normal 6-8" hole for disposal of human waste. Keep the requisite distance away from camp sites, trails, and water, and there shouldn't be a problem. I don't really want even biodegradable plastic bags littering the place.

    6. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      I see that "take only pictures, leave only footprints" has now changed to "take only dumps, leave only your signature as yellow snow."

      So much for the pack getting lighter each day.

    7. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      I really don't have a problem with animal crap. It rarely causes problems when camping or hiking. My problem with human crap is that people rarely cover it well enough.

      Poorly covered human crap has some annoying side effects not seen with everyday animal poop. First, the slippery splat factor which, while pretty rare even in heavily trafficked areas, is just disgusting; not usually a problem with animal dung unless you really aren't paying attention to where you're going. Second, to most wildlife human crap doesn't smell like it belongs, which can bring some really unwanted visitors.

      6-8" isn't a deep enough hole to completely eliminate the smell of human poo, and I'm not advocating for people to crap in biodegradable bags and leave them around. I am advocating for people to crap in biodegradable bags and then bury them 6-8". Sanitary disposal which better masks the scent of human spoor and leaves the ground more fertile - where is the downside?

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    8. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Speaking as yet another hiker/camper/climber the idea that you'd even notice someone else's shit in the wild, especially after proper trenching, is ridiculous. How many people do you know that would actually shit within easy site of a trail? It's not like other animals don't shit in the woods. Digging scat holes is the proper way to do it unless you're planning to pack it out, which I promise you from personal experience is not pleasant, even done properly.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Why do that when one can sell them @ $10/3 and keep it as profit to reinvest in the business or (gasp) pay to the owners?

    10. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Easy sight of a trail, damnit!

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    11. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You think bears are going to buy these bags too? Or the deer?

    12. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by bartle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A cat-hole is not always an option, depending on where you go and the season. The current expectation is that in these situations all hikers will pack their excrement out. I've observed that most people are fine with packing out trash but draw the line at feces. I think a lot of people would be fine with carrying in a little extra weight if they could minimize their interaction with their own stool.

    13. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      That would be similar to buy one, give one option for purchasing a BoGoLight solar powered flashlight. At the moment, they are offering the option of buy one for yourself and having the other one go to Haiti.

      http://www.bogolight.com/

      Another organization is the freeplayfoundation.org. They offer the option of donating a wind-up or solar powered radio to poor people in Haiti or other countries, but do not seem to have a buy one, give one option.

      By the way, I do not know much about either organization.

    14. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Because I think that some companies can significantly increase their market share and profit by being advocates for humanity. While not true in all cases, there are certain products that are more likely to sell by tugging at your heart strings than by the pure merits of the product. Tom's shoes and several coffee marketing companies have followed a similar model (though I have to admit that I'm not sure how successfully).

    15. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by potat0man · · Score: 1

      where is the downside?
      Other than forcing everyone to take great pains in their outdoor activity's preparation and costs in order to suit your apparently miraculously-sensitive nose that can pickup scents buried 8" below the dirt? Nah, no downside.

    16. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see how successful that is as a strategy. Starbucks is definitely example - they charge a premium, but these days you hardly hear about *why* they're charging a premium -- to the point where I think most people assume it's just because it tastes better [to them- I think SB is crap :P]. The problem is that there's never an apples-to-apples comparison: you can't compare SBUX to another coffee company because the other companies are different sizes and often with target different markets (dunkin donuts, etc).

    17. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I'm not a yuppie. I'll use the bags I get when I buy groceries in the non-yuppie stores.

    18. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by daveime · · Score: 1

      Well at least he'll be able to find truffles. Oink Oink.

    19. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by daveime · · Score: 1

      A bear and a rabbit are in the woods.

      The bear says to the rabbit, "tell me, do you have trouble with shit sticking to your fur" ?

      The rabbit responds, "no".

      So the bear picks up the rabbit, and wipes his ass with it.

    20. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by gawaino · · Score: 0

      Use as pet waste bags? People in first-world countries spend a lot of time and money cleaning up after dogs.

    21. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      Cute. But, I never said I can smell buried crap; I can't.

      Some animals can. Which is where reading the part where I said, "to most wildlife" might have helped - of course, then you wouldn't have any material to fire off half-assed attempts at wit.

      I have had a couple of camping trips unpleasantly interrupted at night by bears because someone didn't properly bury their shit. And no, neither time had anything to do with food scent; after both ordeals we tracked the bears paths back to someone's badly covered shit the bears had dug up.

      Also, how is stopping at the store to pick up some of these bags "great pains in their outdoor activity's preparation and costs"? You're going to have to go to the store for normal supplies, anyway, and the bags are only supposed to cost a few cents, each.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    22. Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model? by MmmmAqua · · Score: 1

      Read the post again. I never said I can smell it.

      ...this is Slashdot, so I guess it's ridiculous of me to expect people to read my post before flexing their e-nuts.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
  28. *Sniff Sniff* by derekg52 · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit.

    Bonus: Captcha = excretes

  29. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Ractive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    RTFA
    it's for URBAN areas where people already crap in plastic bags and throw them helicopter style, this addresses the sanitation/disease problem.

  30. Soylent Green is FECES! by bodland · · Score: 1

    Oh my god I am so sorry.

  31. Finally get those kids off jenkem by HalAtWork · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, we can get those kids off jenkem!

    1. Re:Finally get those kids off jenkem by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      It's really amazing how much I learn browsing here . . .

  32. Re:But does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it run Linux?

  33. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Quaz+and+Wally · · Score: 1
    From the article

    He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a “flyaway toilet” or a “helicopter toilet.”

    ...

    He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.

  34. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. Going behind a bush is free and works just as well. This is good for environmentally conscious rich people only!!!

  35. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by postglock · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

  36. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This.

    These "solutions" for fixing the third world all suck. It's just a bunch of Bono and Dean Kamen-style feel good bullshit that doesn't actually make a difference. What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth. We already have technology that works great for shitting, making clean water, etc. The only word that a third world advocate needs to know is "industrialize."

  37. I immediately thought... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    ...of a really disgusting version of haggis.
    Yes. MORE disgusting haggis!

  38. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They may already use bags like this, but they certainly aren't buying them at the market for that purpose. These are the kinds of places where people live on half a dollar per day. No poor person is going to devote 6% of their income to crapping. They'll reuse an old bag if they can find one, but barring that, they're just going to take a dump on the ground or dig a small hole.

  39. Shit provides both food and fuel by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    e.g.

    http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=methane+digester

    You get methane which can be burned as fuel and the digestate is high in nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium.

    Alternatively, lower tech without the gas tight fittings, drop the methane capture idea and use a dry toilet. It's more a matter of education and organisation than anything else.

    I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans. We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields. It's dumb.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Shit provides both food and fuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up

    2. Re:Shit provides both food and fuel by Eclipse-now · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans. We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields. It's dumb.

      It's not only dumb, it's dangerous, as we are fast approaching peak phosphorus but it will take years to adapt our sewerage and agricultural systems around the new realities when peak phosphorous affects world phosphorus prices. One podcast I heard from the University of Technology, Sydney, Sustainable Future's Institute mentioned something like 25 years to really prepare for peak phosphorus. They recommended starting early because we're going to have to get the departments of waste to talk to the departments of agriculture, etc. Huge infrastructure changes coming!

  40. Overkill for pee by srussia · · Score: 1

    From TFA: 'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.

    If you pee when you poo, then this is superfluous as pee already contains urea.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  41. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by davester666 · · Score: 1

    And shovels. Or are you expected to dig the hole with your hands?

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  42. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by wintercolby · · Score: 1

    All he needs to do is to put non-branded thank-you logos on them, and market them to the close-to-the-slums grocery stores. I doubt that those "flyaway toilets" are paid for by the users. More likely they're using the bags that the food originally came in.

    This only works if the bags can safely hold food products before being used for disposal at the other end of the cycle.

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
  43. Infrastructure is a target by wurp · · Score: 1

    In an area where the political system turns over every couple of years, investments are targets, including infrastructure. When trying to control a group, ruining something they invested a lot of time in and need for day to day life is a very effective threat.

  44. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, and you work your farm day in and day out - and you could take part of your earning to increase your production - wouldn't you invest?

  45. Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No shit

  46. From a practical standpoint, by vandelais · · Score: 2, Funny

    is the bag flammable?

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
    1. Re:From a practical standpoint, by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Why? Are you planning on lighting them on fire on people's doorsteps, ringing their door bell, and running away?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:From a practical standpoint, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is the bag flammable?

      That would create one flaming shitstorm...

  47. Could also be used after earthquakes or tornadoes by Rick17JJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The disposable toilets could also be used after disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes or tornadoes. It also might be useful for homeowners to use during a several day long power outage after a wind storm or an ice storm. It would be an alternative to grabbing a shovel and going in the back yard or on undeveloped land nearby.

    Baby wipes or similar disposable disinfectant wipes could be used to clean the person's hands afterwards, if no working water faucet is available. I sometimes use a baby wipe for my hands after using a Clivus Multrum composting toilet or an old pit toilet in the national forest, where no running water is available. I usually keep several in my day pack when hiking, just in case. The baby wipes could also be used on overnight backpacking trips when camping where no running water is available.

    As a child, I remember visiting a several older relatives such as my grandparents, who had an outhouse on each of their farms. Grandpa's was a three hole outhouse. If I remember correctly, they had a small bucket of lime and would sometimes sprinkle a little over the poop. There was also some corn cobs and an old Sears catalog, just in case they ever ran out of toilet paper. If I am not mistaken, the corn cob is supposed to be used together with a page from the Sears catalog. As a child, I also enjoyed using the hand operated pump for pumping water from the well.

    Of course they did also have one toilet and running water in the house, but as a child I found it more interesting to use the outhouse and the hand pumped well.

  48. Obligatory South Park Quote by jayveekay · · Score: 1

    "Mom, bathroom!" [Cartman, during a days long WoW leveling grind]

  49. Better idea by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Instead of giving them things to poop in, give them something that will help solve their real problems: Population. Give them condoms, IUDs, birth control patches, free vasectomies and tubal ligations. After about 30 years their problems will be MUCH more solvable.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    1. Re:Better idea by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not that they don't have access to birth control (well, some don't, but...), it's that many/most people in those places don't necessarily want it. Change attitudes about that and they'll do a lot to get their own birth control. Otherwise, giving away a bunch of free rubbers just translates into amusing balloon tricks for the impoverished world.

    2. Re:Better idea by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Unless you also intend to do a complete cultural overhaul and ban the catholic church...it won't do all that much.

      Sending condoms to africa has been attempted, the continent has been infected with HIV anyway.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  50. Named and Marketed by the Same People... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...who brought you "The Gimp." Another great product no self-respecting adult will ever ask for by name.

    1. Re:Named and Marketed by the Same People... by malkavian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thought it would have been brought to you by the people who gave you Wii..

  51. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by tftp · · Score: 1

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, and you work your farm day in and day out - and you could take part of your earning to increase your production - wouldn't you invest?

    No. If you are a farmer and have a field and you work in that field, with shovel, all day long, you might as well use the field. Your contribution will be minor, compared to all other wildlife that is there and isn't going to use this invention.

    This device is useful only when a hole in the ground is not an option, like in a city. You'd still need to dispose of the device, though - by flinging it, perhaps? :-)

  52. Peepoo by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Porta-potty AND portmanteau

  53. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth", and population control. I mean, come on. A guy can't afford a can of beans to share with his special other, but they can fuck all night long for years, creating more mouths to feed. Most Americans can't imagine the poverty in some of this world's cities - but no matter how poor, there is always a ready supply of babies.

    The human is an amazing animal. He shares some characteristics with the rats and cockroaches.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  54. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by timster · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think it's bullshit advice to assume that poor countries trying to industrialize now will be successful if they follow the same technological path as the countries that industrialized during the Industrial Revolution.

    Just as an example, you wouldn't suggest that a poor country should develop a copper voice telecom industry like rich countries did, would you? It's much more effective to build a wireless voice network, since the tech available is so much cheaper now.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  55. SNL by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

    Anybody have a link to the Darnette Disposable Toilet commercial from SNL? It seems rather appropriate at the moment, and my cursory Google searching isn't turning up anything.

  56. Woot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really makes you think twice about buying Woot's next Bag of Crap.

  57. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    You'd be best to keep wildlife off of your field, should they eat your crops before you harvest.

    Fecal matter alone does not make the best Fertilizer - combining it with certain chemicals does.

    Also, crapping on a carrot doesn't mean it'll grow bigger, it means you just infested it with waste that often carries diseases.

    This bag is far more than just a new Ziplock - thats why its news.

  58. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by pipingguy · · Score: 1
  59. Socialist countries for the win ? by unity100 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    whenever i discuss with a conservative american, they always counter with the bullshit that is 'american system is the best there can be, and "socialism has failed"'. after reminding them socialism != communism, and what they term socialism is named social democracy in europe and has been working miracles in the latter half of the century, i end up having to give them examples. generally i give scandinavian countries as examples. because they have been made believe 'america is the best and there is nothing else', they generally come up never having researched or wondered how people live in other countries.

    it always ends up the same way ; when i establish it with various citations and statistics from international sources that all the stuff they thought cannot work well (like public healthcare etc) has been working very well in these countries, they always come up with the same brainmelting objection ; 'but it curtails innovation and enterprise'. no surprise, because since they never wondered what was happening around the world elsewhere, being so self-indulged, i end up having to establish that a lot of the innovations and inventions we have been using lately has been coming from those places. (first osmosis plant, wood chip plant, recently ended 30 year long gsm usage versus cancer rate research, first humongous, datacenter-grade home internet connection test - examples are countless).

    this is just another example i will end up using while waking them up to the wide, wide world.

    1. Re:Socialist countries for the win ? by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Heh, you think that crap is working well, eh? Well, with half of Europe on the verge of going bankrupt (including core EU members Italy and FRANCE!), I hope they had a good time squandering their savings, because they are about to get a hard dose of austerity. The Scandinavians have done well only because they have lots of energy resources, the same reason Chavez hasn't found himself standing on a pile of rubble that used to be a functioning country YET. Of course, the US is just as bad, having spent our way into oblivion on various social programs, and fascist bailouts (I say fascist because they have effectively merged bailed out corporations with the state). The last I heard, the Scandenavians were beginning to transfer back to a capitalist system, but that is going to be hard going.

      Yup, we're all going to hell. I hope you've got gold, silver, a stockpile of vital supplies, and/or a marketable skill that will be of value in a third world nation. If you live in the US or Europe, that is exactly where you will be within the next 20 years.

    2. Re:Socialist countries for the win ? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Core EU member Italy?
      Italy is the Mexico of the EU. They have always been broke.

    3. Re:Socialist countries for the win ? by mirix · · Score: 1

      Broke is relative. Bulgaria and Romania have the new title of "EU Mexico". Before they joined it was the LV/LT/EE. Before them, it was... probably Portugal, I'm not certain.

      Italy is the brokest of the original EEC members though.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    4. Re:Socialist countries for the win ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      and what is the fucking reason they are going bankrupt ? huh ? the very fact that a particular G5 nation allowed its finance industry to SCAM entire world, to the extent of bankrupting countries ?

      and DESPITE the fact that they are going bankrupt, they have been able to hand out over $1 trillion combined with no hassles, and with REAL money instead of printing money from their central banks, in order to fix the global crisis YOU have created ? your congressmen have been whining that us govt didnt have the money to do the bailout in the meantime, and fed has been printing money like a banana republic to ready the cash.

      excuse me mister, but, your country is being a burden on entire world. its time you fixed those private bloodsucker corporations of yours.

  60. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by asvravi · · Score: 1

    That's about the cost of a full breakfast for those people.

  61. How about California? by willy_me · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget the article writeup, my first thought was California. All of the illegals working on the fields have no place to "go". Some farms might provide facilities but when the need is there they are too far away. Currently, the field becomes a toilet - be sure to wash that broccoli!!

    I might be wrong regarding the severity of the problem in California, but I know it is a problem around Vancouver. Considering how much more produce is grown in California and its general vicinity to Mexico, I would imagine the problem being far worse. This bag provides a possible solution. One would just have to require that farms provide them for their workers. And the farms can afford them.

    1. Re:How about California? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Forget the article writeup, my first thought was California. All of the illegals working on the fields have no place to "go". Some farms might provide facilities but when the need is there they are too far away. Currently, the field becomes a toilet - be sure to wash that broccoli!!

      They have porta potties these days. I assume credit for that goes to the UFW.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:How about California? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      The bad press the last few years of multiple infected crops have changed farming practices a bit. In my immediate area - Michigan - they are enforcing these new rules rather harshly. Every field with workers has to have porta potties, designated eating areas, can't have outside food or even beverages outside of those areas. Want a drink of water? Fine, walk to the designated area and don't swig from a water bottle in the field.

      A local farmer last year was giving his mandated inspection tour - which costs a fee of course. While giving the tour he picked an apple off a tree and ate it. Instant fine for eating outside of the designated area. And people wonder why it's cheaper to ship apples from China, South America, etc than grow them locally.

    3. Re:How about California? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Uuum, it’s called fertilizer! Look it up!

      In most of the world, people use manure (liquid or solid) as the main fertilizer. There’s nothing wrong with it.

      As long as you’re not doing it ON the plants. And you should always wash your food before eating it anyway.

      (Protip: If washing it would destroy it, it’s processed/industry food, and should be avoided. ^^)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:How about California? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In three years working in the fields of California with Mexicans, I never saw this behavior. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it doesn't happen all the time.

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:How about California? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You assume wrong.

      Credit goes to the FDA.

      Porta potties required by federal law.

      The farm works don't care if a bunch of gringos get sick.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:How about California? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      There is something seriously wrong in America if we have to regress from the toilet to using shit bags. WTF is wrong with you people!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:How about California? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As further evidence the problem of people pooping and peeing on the fields is a real problem, here in central Europe, they don't allow women with skirts on the 'pick your own' fields. Everyone has to wear trousers.

      Gross when you think about the strawberries you picked last Summer.

    8. Re:How about California? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shit-bag has gone, you've got Obama now.

    9. Re:How about California? by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 0

      Obviously bread, homemade or not, needs to be avoided.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    10. Re:How about California? by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      If you're out in a field and the shitter is a 10 minute walk and you step away from the job to go, you're not doing a good job. Find nearby cover and go. You don't go right on the plants anyway, it splashes back.

      This has nothing to do with "illegals" its SOP for farmers, landscapers, greenskeepers, loggers, woodsmen, etc.

    11. Re:How about California? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying a farm worker would rather relieve him- or herself in an open field in front of his/her co-workers than walk to the end of a row and use a porta potty. Um, yeah...

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    12. Re:How about California? by hab136 · · Score: 1

      No, he's saying that the farm owners would rather not spend the money to rent (and more importantly clean and service) a porta potty.

  62. This is a truly great invention by tmosley · · Score: 1

    FOR ME TO POOP ON! But seriously, this is awesome. I want one for my cabin.

  63. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by gknoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree on the merits of population control, but in a society where the primary thing is agriculture, rather than manufacturing or other industrialized stuff, one's family's productivity tends to scale with the number of hands one can produce capable of tending crops (or herds or what-have-you). Moreover, the presence of diseases, poor medical facilities, and other factors contribute heavily to child death rates, and thus being able to make more of them is a way to ensure the genetic line goes on.

    Clearly, making so many that none can eat is a poor idea, but so is making too few and being unable to harvest enough food to feed the family. Simiarly, you'd feel pretty shitty if your only kid (and co-laborer) went and broke his leg, or blew it off in a land mine, or died of AIDS, or got bit by a snake, or killed by a neighboring group of people.

  64. World Toilet Summit by MrTripps · · Score: 1

    "How was last year's World Toilet Summit?" "Pretty crappy."

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  65. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You just say "Peepoo" and the sheer awesomeness of it digs it for you.

  66. A great idea indeed by delta98 · · Score: 0

    Hell, if this Bloombox and other forms take hold I might be able to recycle my tinfoil collection.

  67. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    I understand what you're saying, and I pretty much agree with you. But, TFA seems to be designing and marketing these things to a more urban market. Disease is still a concern, but the hands to tend the fields doesn't really apply here. ;^)

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  68. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally someone who posts what we needed to see. *Most* of the African cultures needed to realize higher levels of civilization on their own rather than have it crammed down their throats.

  69. In Soviet Russia by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Disposable toilets fertilize YOU!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  70. So buy the full bags by DG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a business opportunity here.

    A traditional "helicopter toilet" is a problem; it's shit stored in a non-degradable bag. Separating the shit from the bag to make fertilizer is non-viable (for a number of reasons) So it is hazardous waste.

    But a load in this bag is quite literally a unit of fertilizer. Not immediately (there is processing time involved) but eventually that bag of shit is going to have a value.

    Work out that value, subtract the cost of the bag, storage and handling costs, etc - and then give away the bags and pay people for full ones.

    Not only do you encourage the use of the bags (a net benefit to hygiene) you inject money into the local economy and you make a profit - while helping improve the food supply.

    Put another way:

    1. Give away bags

    2. Buy full bags

    3. Store full bags until they become viable fertilizer

    4. Sell fertilizer

    5. Profit!!!

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:So buy the full bags by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, you're probably not going to break even that way.

      But give away bags, and provide a receptacle, that could do it.

    2. Re:So buy the full bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Patent this business process.
      Step 2: Sue the entrepreneur who actually does it.
      Step 3: PROFIT

    3. Re:So buy the full bags by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      There's a business opportunity here.

      A traditional "helicopter toilet" is a problem; it's shit stored in a non-degradable bag.

      Please don't give the airlines any ideas. If they had their way we'd be paying $12 for a Poopee and the cheap bastard beside me would be farting and sweating bullets the whole time trying to hold it in until we land.

    4. Re:So buy the full bags by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      I think this is viable, if for no other reason than because it's been suggested by someone with a three-digit ID #.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:So buy the full bags by malkavian · · Score: 1

      What about:
      1) Put bags underground.
      2) Plant seeds on there
      3) Watch seeds feed on nutrients.
      4) Sell food.
      5) Profit/ enjoy the fact you've just fed someone crap and see them prosper on it.

    6. Re:So buy the full bags by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      What if, instead of providing and then collecting bags, you provided some sort of special receptacle for wastes? You could place numerous such devices throughout populated areas. They could feed wastes into any sort of tank, processing system, or pipeline. You could even design the receptacles such that a user could sit on an ergonomic surface while delivering their waste. Since the receptacles are in central locations, one could even imagine providing special, cheap paper and even water and soap for sanitary purposes.

    7. Re:So buy the full bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brown gold

    8. Re:So buy the full bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wogs are too lazy to walk 100 yard's to the nearest rent-a-bog.

    9. Re:So buy the full bags by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Sewage systems cost money to build and maintain and it would be a nightmare to fit them in slums that grow every day in the most chaotic ways.

      I read an article in a newspaper about this.

      Many alternatives are being tested but there are too many cultural issues to be addressed. It's very hard to talk with public officials about sanitation, it's considered taboo in many places. And it's incredibly hard to educate the people, they consider this subject extremely offensive. For instance, in India many people refuse to shit inside the house, so they shit on river banks.

      The same problem with AIDS, since in many cultures talking about sex is taboo (but not doing it big time :-) hence the AIDS problem).

      That being said, without gigantic efforts to educate people and an infrastructure to collect them, I believe these bags will become helicopters or be dumped in the river, just like the supermarket plastic ones.

    10. Re:So buy the full bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is true, why don't cities do it? they have pipes running in every streets, collecting shit from our toilets.
      If shit is this valuable, cities should be making shitloads of money out of it ;)
      So why do we pay taxes to get them to collect our shit???

    11. Re:So buy the full bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you'd be the Poopsmith.

  71. Full of win (and poo) by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

    Greatest. Product. Name. Ever.

  72. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    200 years back 90% of the world - including probably your grand parents - lived that standard of life. It is surprising how easy it is to get used to not having a SUV to drive and McD to go to. Even not have electricity and hot water for 24x7. No even have a super market to go buy groceries to and depend just on your wit to earn that extra bread that you would share with your SO.

    However, even 200 years back 90% of the world - including probably your grand parents - fuxxed. Human is an amazing animal. He shares some characteristics with the rats and cockroaches.

    Dude. Stop looking down on people.

  73. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd be best to keep wildlife off of your field, should they eat your crops before you harvest.

    It's not humanly possible to do even in the USA. The fences around fields are just to mark property lines and hold cattle. Deer jump over the fences with ease, and coyotes crawl under, and wild pigs just go straight through.

    Also not all wildlife is damaging your interests. A deer isn't going to eat much grass, compared to your 100 cows, and if you want you can eat the deer when it gets fat enough :-) If you are a farmer, coyotes and foxes aren't going to eat your alfalfa.

    Fecal matter alone does not make the best Fertilizer - combining it with certain chemicals does.

    The soil contains chemicals, water, bacteria, plants and small animals (worms, insects) to do that work for you. This is hardly a new discovery. Chemicals in a bag are needed only because of the bag. Perhaps they are an improvement, but one that isn't worth 3 cents or even 0.03 cents to a farmer. A city dweller might benefit from that improvement, though - if he cares (big if.)

    Also, crapping on a carrot doesn't mean it'll grow bigger, it means you just infested it with waste that often carries diseases.

    That's not exactly how it works. Fields are often fertilized with manure, and plants grow bigger on those nutrients. Plants's cells are pretty good on separating good and bad materials. Contamination is occurring primarily during the harvest, when bacteria are placed directly onto the produce. In any case, as I mentioned there are thousands of wild animals at or above your field, and you can't do anything about them. Typically they are not a health problem. But you are expected to carefully wash the produce anyway; that's the step that was probably missing in those recent contamination stories in the news.

  74. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These places usually don't have much of social safety net to care for the aged. Therefore, if you want to be taken care of in your old age you better have as many children as you can, while you can, in the hopes that they will be able to share the burden between them to do so.

  75. The jokes practically write themselves by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Why does Daryl McBride carry a Peepoo around on his shoulder? Because "two heads are better than one!"

    What's the difference between a Peepoo and a Windows fanboyz brain? The sack!

    What did the fly say when he saw the Peepoo? "That's some good shit, man!"

    Who named this product? The inventor's two year old child?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:The jokes practically write themselves by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      And of course, the classic: "Mommy, why do these tomatoes taste like shit?" "Shut up and fill this self-sterilizing bag!"

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  76. Re:But does it run Linux? by kpainter · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but if you put a copy of Windows in the bag, bury it and when you come back in 10 years, you will have an old copy of Windows.

  77. Easy by Explodicle · · Score: 1

    They'll stop pooping.

  78. Will it work for doggy waste? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Lots of owners have tons of natural fertilizer on hand that I'm sure they'd love to use in their backyard gardens. Same thing with farmers on an industrial scale.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  79. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Gardyloo!

    And Gardypoo too.

    --

    Engineers do it reliably.

  80. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That didn't address the issue: poor peasants who can't afford toilets still live in urban areas.

  81. It won't change anything by Stuckey · · Score: 1

    If the third world doesn't have the will to build and use toilets, why would anyone think that they, if given this poop-bag, would deficate in it and then use it as fertilizer for crops? Someone might have overlooked the fact that to the third-worlders, there isn't any problem to be solved. It would seem that to at least some of them shitting on a beach is normal (as shown at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae0_1264118582).

  82. If you cannot afford a toilet? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    how will you afford this?

    And human waste can already be taken care of by a simple pit dug in the ground, with maybe some specially selected plants if you really want to get fancy.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  83. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    They have little else to do for entertainment. That's why we need cheap laptops, so they can get on Slashdot instead of fornicating. The more time someone spends on Slashdot the less likely they are to procreate.

  84. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by badran · · Score: 1

    This is a solution looking for a problem, a solution has been already discovered that is more self-sustaining:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outhouse#End_of_pit_life

  85. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by MikePikeFL · · Score: 1

    So I agree with most of what you say- but dude, how old do you think he is? "200 years back"? "Including your grandparents"? :-)

    --
    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway" -Andrew Tanenbaum
  86. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by badran · · Score: 1

    This is happening today, look at the Mobile vs. Land Lines numbers for East Asian, Africa and South America....

  87. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Kismet · · Score: 1

    They already have population control. It comes in a surprising number of natural flavors: poverty, disease, crime, disaster. For some strange reason, we demand population control only on the procreative terminus.

    Actually, I know the reason: it's because a biologist by the name of Garrett Hardin wrote an essay in 1968 called the "Tragedy of the Commons" in which he claimed that humans must adopt a new kind of outlook in order to protect the earth's common resources. There is this class of problems, you see, that has no technical solution and the only way around them (according to Hardin) is to reprogram our sense of morality--of what our legitimate Rights are.

    If we give up the natural and human right to procreate and have families, abdicating that right to a managerial class, then we can continue to enjoy "the greatest good for the greatest number" (proportionally speaking).

    This entire argument is predicated on the unexamined assumption that the overriding human purpose is not a teleological one, but an instinctual one: the individual need to have, at minimum, "my fair portion" of the commons. It is an assumption of greed or avarice as the natural human state--the idea that people will typically maximize their own "good" even if doing so ruins the commons for everyone else. Although Hardin's essay contains some rather unassailable logic in it, I find scientists have always made poor philosophers, ethicists, sociologists, and so forth.

    So, while your argument for population control (and by this you mean restricted procreation) is a valid one, it is not the only approach to this problem that has no technical solution.

  88. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, do you really CARE? Having lived in Africa for many years, I can tell you for most of these people, the answer is almost certainly no. Throughout history they have urinated and defecated behind some convenient bush. Giving them bags to poop in will likely get you a blank stare at best, more likely an incredulous 'you want me to do WHAT in here and put it where?'

    Also, are they going to provide them with shovels to bury the bags too?

  89. I thought ... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I thought horse manure to grow crops was disgusting, imagine last nights calamari and red wine!

  90. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Who's looking down? I allowed my hormones to lead me around when I toured the world's cities. When I mock man, I'm mocking myself, right along with all other men.

    Rats and cockroaches, I say . . . .

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  91. Yay by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I could also imagine a beowulf cluster of these

  92. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

    Everything costs money. Cleaning up poobags (non-disposable) costs money. The government (or the neighbors) might be willing to give out these bags if it meant not having to deal with poo.

  93. A:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system by boristdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A joke about corruption in Latin America vs. Africa:

    An African diplomat was visiting his counterpart in Mexico. The Mexican diplomat had a 10 room house and a Rolls Royce.
    The African diplomat says: "How did you afford all this?"
    The Mexican diplomat points to a nearby highway. "You see that highway? I got 10% of the construction cost."

    Years later the Mexican diplomat visits his African counterpart. The African diplomat has a 100-room mansion and 10 expensive cars.
    The Mexican diplomat says: "WOW! How did you afford all this?"
    The African diplomat points to an empty stretch of countryside. "You see that highway? I got 100% of the construction cost!"

  94. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by gtbritishskull · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A guy can't afford a can of beans

    there is always a ready supply of babies.

    I have a Modest Proposal for you...

  95. umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you use it, dig a hole, throw this inside, and you cover the hole. Now, what's wrong with using the hole in the first place?

  96. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in? Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.

    If you are a subsistence farmer -- as poor peasants tend to be -- a device that lets you turn otherwise-dangerous human waste into safe fertilizer is, in a sense, food. Or at least, a tool that directly contributes to your supply of food.

  97. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Most of the first world has done a great job of population control without resorting to restricted procreation.

    Some will argue that wealth automagically brings down population growth rates.

    I will argue correlation not causation.

    Many societies became wealthy at about the same time as they started to educate their women for more then just housework.

    When half the population does the hard work in procreation we can hardly be surprised to see less procreation going on when that half the population gains economically. Especially if they are now working much harder and longer to achieve their economic gains. (Yes I just ripped on how hard housewives 'work'.)

    We need to do more to educate middle eastern women. That will fix those bastards real good.

    I guess you could call that a form of restricted procreation.

    This is /. We know all about 'restricted procreation' via picky women.

    Finally I would argue that 'space for spawn' is not purely an example of commons to the extent that parents pay their own spawns way.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  98. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth", and population control.

    Economic growth and stable governments providing strong social safety nets are population control. Not of the mandatory, authoritarian kind, but there the one thing that has consistently led to declining family sizes in human history, because they are the things that stop people from investing in creating children as a form of old-age support.

  99. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by volxdragon · · Score: 1

    All pyramid schemes ultimately fail...

  100. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, I get the feeling that you're about offer us a modest proposal.

  101. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in? Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.

    This still has applications in a semi-first world nation like the US, especially during a disaster scenario. Before you say food and water are more important, you might want to reflect back on the Superdome incident. Feces from thousands of people in 100 degree weather contained in the Superdome and it starts to become more important than food (but not water).

    "During that lonely and frightening time, Norton starved himself in fear of having to use the restroom facilities. An unthinkable stench of feces permeated the Superdome. As disgusting as the restrooms were, Norton vowed to only drink water to keep from dehydrating. Fearing for his safety, he urinated only in the upper level of the dome."

    Former USM student is finally able to tell of Katrina nightmare:
    http://www.usm.edu/afterkatrina/Bueto.html

  102. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    *cough*

    Have you looked at historical charts of the world's population? You mention China. Prior to the 1800's, China never had more than a half billion people. The rest of the world's population was proportionate.

    Thanks to a number of factors, we've seen a tremendous population explosion in the last ~175 years. Something needs to change, or like rats, we'll consume all the world's resources, then starve.

    Ehhh. Whatever.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  103. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

    Bagged poo flinging?! Hey, when you're poor you have to get your entertainment any way you can.

    If I was poor I'd carry my poo-bag on a stick like a hobo. Then I'd use the stick as a make-shift treb-poo-chet to launch it at some rich bastards house.

  104. Better than a stream, ditch or bush? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Why would people who are comfortable with their present methods switch to another that costs them a portion of their daily food ration? I applaud the fellow for trying to solve the plight of the third-world but, the only place this would be accepted and have utility--were it actually legal to do so--would be in the developed world where access to ordinary means of doing your business are unavailable.

    If the first-world truly cared to solve the problems of such people we would be intelligently investing in their education and infrastructure (hiring predominantly local labor) not dumping our surplus food stuffs onto their markets thereby robbing the farmers of their livelyhood. Moreover, we would provide the training and tools necessary for their farmers to meet our standards of wholesomeness to permit access to our markets. We would also stop raping their lands of natural resources with out fair compensation to the people in forms useful to them (see above) rather than a handful of autocrats to finance their petty wars.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:Better than a stream, ditch or bush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could not agree more!! Finally someone reasoning straight. Thankyou.

  105. Whoosh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the sound of K. S. Kyosuke's joke whizzing over your head. (Hint: Click his link, or even just pay attention to the fact it only spans one word.)

    1. Re:Whoosh... by badran · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of another fly....

  106. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by emilper · · Score: 1

    Relax, it's just Slashdot slowly composting into a clone of TED. Let them eat cake, indeed.

    It's not about "poor peasants", but about urban slums, who would not be able to grow food anyway for lack of space to plant the crops on.

    From the fine article:

    Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.

    Urea would do wonders for the taste of the ground water, and the beautiful bags would make for spectacular "helicopter toilets" (term used in the very fine article).

    But Therese Dooley, senior adviser on sanitation and hygiene for Unicef, said that inculcating sanitation habits was no easy task.

    How about using some of the money spent on making sure poor stupid people don't do drugs, have sex before marriage or cross borders without permission, and build sewers ?

    Reading this kind of neo-Victorian crap on Slashdot does make me feel old ... in the days of yore there were flame wars about filesystems, *BSD vs. Linux or Perl vs. Python, while the poor peasants were perfectly able to compost their own feces without help from sanitation advocacy groups. Now the poor peasants are in need of shit bags, and this is news for nerds, stuff that really matters.

  107. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Kerrigann · · Score: 1

    Fixing poverty is the best population control.

    http://www.gapminder.org/videos/what-stops-population-growth/

  108. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

    Maybe GP is from a family where they don't reach child-bearing age until 67 or so.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  109. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame Catholicism (or at least Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo).

    The idiots won't let people wear condoms and spread FUD that condoms can't help prevent HIV.

    Can Condoms Kill?

    Hardliners in the Vatican say condoms can kill - they have holes in them and fail to protect against AIDS. Furthermore they claim there is science to prove it.

    In the film, the European Union condemns the Catholic Church over "bigotry" in its approach to condoms. But leading Catholic Churchmen in Latin America and Africa say that condoms could actually be making the AIDS epidemic worse [...]

    WTF is wrong with these people?

  110. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but no matter how poor, there is always a ready supply of babies.

    You are suggesting someone invent a bag that turns babies into fertiliser?

  111. 3, 2, 1 by lennier · · Score: 1

    Free Poo Movement!

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  112. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by jmrives · · Score: 1
    Well, lets see. You may be right. According to the article, the item will sell for 2 - 3 pennies. Lets assume 3 pennies. Now, lets also assume a potential customer is regular once-a-day. That would mean they would need 365 * 3 pennies = 1095 pennies or $10.95/per year. That may not seem like much but when a person's annual income is measured in hundreds of dollars (some times less), that amount might be significant. To offset this, we should consider that there may be some value added -- especially if the person needs to buy fertilizer to grow crops. The big factor to consider is whether governments and aide organizations see sanitation -- especially in inner city slums -- as a high enough priority to fund this so that there is no cost to the individual. From the article:

    In the developing world, an estimated 2.6 billion people, or about 40 percent of the earth’s population, do not have access to a toilet, according to United Nations figures.

    It is a public health crisis: open defecation can contaminate drinking water, and an estimated 1.5 million children worldwide die yearly from diarrhea, largely because of poor sanitation and hygiene.

    To mitigate this, the United Nations has a goal to reduce by half the number of people without access to toilets by 2015.

  113. Brilliant by pubwvj · · Score: 0

    This is an incredibly brilliant idea for Wilhelmson to make money! Wow! Poop and pay him. Meanwhile, the bear will continue to shit in the woods. Some people are so hung up.

  114. This will be *mandatory* ... by jabberwock · · Score: 1

    ... for New York City dog owners before it's even tested in Africa. How could the inventor not have realized that the most lucrative market for this is dog owners in cities?

  115. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by quenda · · Score: 1

    If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets,

    Where? I've never seen a peasant farmer who did not have a toilet of some sort.
    In the very first paragraph of TFA it says these are for city slum dwellers.

  116. If it doesn't work as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can always light it and throw it on someone's doorstep, ring the bell and run.

  117. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Assuming a method can be found to transport the filled bags - otherwise they'll just become helicopters too.

  118. Re:Could also be used after earthquakes or tornado by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Hell, I'd love to have a dispenser full of these in my RV.

  119. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by herojig · · Score: 1

    Well, living in a land where 90% of the rural population shits on the ground (Nepal) I don't see this idea coming to fruition here. As noted, no one is going to pay for it, and if given away by the UN and other agencies, it will be dismantled and used for parts (biodegradable shopping bags and water containers?). Currently, there are numerous projects building sanitation systems that look like better ideas then distributing millions of peepoo bags. Back to the drawing board on this one!

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  120. May not be suitable for aircraft transportation... by commport1 · · Score: 1

    Hang on, didn't terrorists use Fertilizer as one of the two major components in the 1993 Oklahoma city bombings? I smell a rat.....(or is it something else?)...

  121. fraud by malp · · Score: 1

    how are you going to deal with fraud? Would you give me cash for a bag of dirt I scooped up around the corner outta sight?

  122. 1 poop * 365 day * 100 years * 0.02 cents equals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    730 dollars for a lifetime, you spend more on toilet paper in one year

  123. vermiculture is also a good alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    black soldier fly (SF), Hermetia illucens, makes fertilizer fast, and its food, cleanest fly ever!!!

    Engineering, Separation and Recycling LLC

    This tropical fly larva ... digests putrescent waste at the standard rate of roughly 15 kgs per square meter of unit surface per day.

    Prota(TM)Culture & The BioPod(TM) - Advanced Composting Using Black Soldier Fly: The Future of Food Waste Diversion & Recycling

    A working BioPod(TM) can easily handle the daily food scraps produced by a large family - up to 5 lbs per day. It can even digest pet feces. For every 100 lbs of kitchen scraps you will get 5 lbs of friable compost, a few quarts of nutritious compost tea, and approx. 20 lbs of self-harvesting grubs - which are the freshest fish, herp, and bird food.

    1. Re:vermiculture is also a good alternative by daveime · · Score: 1

      a few quarts of nutritious compost tea

      Lemon or milk ?

      Might sound nutritious, but would *you* drink it ?

    2. Re:vermiculture is also a good alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its liquid fertilizer, food for plants not humans.

  124. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by dcraid · · Score: 1

    I am not sure about poop, but surely some of these people can't afford a pot to pee in.

  125. Re:cost THREE cents? by aqk · · Score: 0

    Geez, I'm paying 5 cents for plastic bags in the supermarket now!
    Maybe I could use things to take home the groceries in!

    I just have to make sure though that when I get home, I don't get confused as to which bag is which...

  126. The Third World is notoriously lacking doorbells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you can't light one, ring, and then run.

  127. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by daveime · · Score: 1

    Which is all very noble, practical, ethical etc.

    But lest we forget, they're still in the middle of a fucking drought zone. Time to stop throwing money, food, farming implements at them and do the practical thing first. Help them move to a place where farming is actually likely to succeed more than one year per decade.

    Then put a cordon around dirt bowls like Ethiopia, or use it as the world's dumping ground, while the farmers can actually farm in decent growing conditions in more temperate climates.

  128. Just two words. by aqk · · Score: 0

    Watch it!

  129. Of all the possible names... by Faerunner · · Score: 1

    ...to refer to a sack of sh!t, they had to use PeePoo? Third graders will get a real kick out of it, at least...

    Just off the top of my head: Humanure (if it's not already patented), Green Latrine, Peecomposition, PissOff (contributed by my fiance), WasteAway, BuryIt, Poo4U, Re-Cycle, Poo-rify (purify), etc. I'm sure someone else can come up with better, too.

  130. Re:1 poop * 365 day * 100 years * 0.02 cents equal by TimboJones · · Score: 1

    $0.02 != 0.02 cents

    Have we learned nothing? Though since you switched units once in each direction the math is still correct.

    I probably spend less than $200 directly on TP per year. But I probably use more than $730 worth, most of that provided gratis and its cost hidden to me. Your point stands.

  131. Needs a catcher name than Wilhemson by Buddy+the+WIld+Geek · · Score: 1

    I mean, the invention of the indoor toilet was named (I think) Thomas Crapper. We need something catchier. PeePoo doesn't seem to do it.

  132. Travelsickness pills advertised on barf bags... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Cover the cost with sponsorship. Bonus, charge extra for advertising someone else.

    I could see McDonald's being more than willing to pay for shitsacks printed with Burger King's logo.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  133. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    Against my principles, I have to reply an AC. Be a man and use your account!

    Dude, it's hard to "industrialise" when you're too busy dying from dysentery, pneumonia, meningitis, tuberculosis, hepatitis, tetanus, cholera, malaria, etc. It's hard to keep a factory working when half your employees have chronic diseases and acute infections kill someone every month or so.

    All the diseases listed above are hygiene related. You don't get to see them in your fancy suburb, but in the third world they are commonplace.

  134. It is dependent on owning land by DG · · Score: 1

    The problem with this model is that success is dependent on owning/renting cropland, to which the average slum dweller does not have access.

    Shit collection, however, anybody can do.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  135. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except they aren't paying for the existing bags

  136. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer'. Isnt there a readily available source of urea that doesnt have to be purchased? Does poo not turn to fertilizer if pee poo was just done in a hole and covered?? Am I missing something here?

  137. Re:But does it run Linux? by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    You'll also have a copy of Windows that seems more functional and popular than the current version.

  138. Ancient Romans by srobert · · Score: 1

    The ancient Romans were smarter than we are. At least they were, until they started drinking water from those lead pipes.

  139. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Economic growth and stable governments providing strong social safety nets are population control. Not of the mandatory, authoritarian kind, but there the one thing that has consistently led to declining family sizes in human history, because they are the things that stop people from investing in creating children as a form of old-age support.

    So, do you believe the U.S. has strong social safety nets, or is it time to go screw my way to retirement? I'm thinking there might be more to "Big Love" than meets the eye.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  140. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by gknoy · · Score: 1

    True. It does seem somewhat strangely aimed as a product.

    Rich people who backpack might want it (I think I would!).
    Poor people in developing countries will poop in a latrine or a humanure contraption, and wonder why they need to pay extra for a bag.

    It does, however, sound like an awesome bit of technology. Very Cool.

  141. Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > True. It does seem somewhat strangely aimed as a product.

    Yes, you certainly wouldn't want this product strangely aimed.

  142. Disposable peepoo bags, cool... wait... what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Requiring every single bag produced everywhere to be biodegradable, duh. They can be used as peepoo bags, AND they won't clog the world's oceans, landfills, and city streets.

  143. Compost Toilet, Anyone? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1
    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.