Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Unveils 'Pink' Phones As Kin One and Two

adeelarshad82 writes "Microsoft has recently launched two new phones known as the Kin One and Kin Two, previously codenamed 'Pink.' The phones are designed to appeal to social-networking-focused teens, which is probably why the marketing team has tried to spice up the packaging of the phones. According to a Microsoft official the phones are named Kin because they 'knit together ... kindred spirits.' The phones have a keyboard. The Kin One has a 5-megapixel camera, while the Kin Two's 8-megapixel camera can shoot 720p HD video. Both cameras include an LED flash. The One has a mono speaker, the Two's is stereo. One includes 4GB of on-board memory and the Two has 8GB. Both Kin phones have touch screens. According to the hands-on, the Kin phones are based on the same Windows CE core as Windows Phone 7, and they have an IE-based browser. These phones have no downloadable apps, no games, not even a calendar. They're not meant to be expandable smart phones; instead, very good messaging phones."

278 comments

  1. The tea leaves say.... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    "No apps. Less functionality than an iPhone. Lame."
    See, Taco, this is how you make correct prophecies...

    .

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The tea leaves say.... by SpockLogic · · Score: 1

      The name's a 'kin joke, right. That's one mistake Apple wouldn't make.

    2. Re:The tea leaves say.... by Tawnos · · Score: 1

      Because iPad doesn't sound like a female sanitary product?

    3. Re:The tea leaves say.... by grub · · Score: 1

      Because iPad doesn't sound like a female sanitary product?

      Apparently iCunt-Rag didn't go over well in Apple's field testing.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:The tea leaves say.... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      But, according to TFA, "they didn't crash". That should be a selling point for those phones, no?

      Or is it more of an indication on the general state of modern smart-phones that not crashing every other hour is becoming a selling point?!

  2. "very good messaging phones"... by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and yet, apparently, without any way to do IM (at least Wikipedia page and links there about them says so)

    Seriously, WTF? I could understand their lack of expandability, software-wise (especially if the price is right), if the "social" package they provide is right (though by no means unique - see INQ phones). But no IM? How did that get through?

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A deal between the manufacturer and the carrier(s), because you are probably going to have data(of which IM uses little), but you might not have unlimited text messages yet.

    2. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has twitter and text messaging. Why do you need IM on top of that?

    3. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by jonnythan · · Score: 4, Funny

      IM is basically worthless if you have SMS.

      SMS > IM.

    4. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      On which planet would this be?

    5. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by nlawalker · · Score: 1

      How so? Don't carriers require you to pay through the nose for SMS, where IM would be part of the data connection you already pay for?

    6. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      It'll be targeted towards the unlimited texting crowd, similar to the sidekick.

    7. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people I know who use/used the Sidekick use it for IM, too.

    8. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, SMS, the IM protocol which you cannot easily use on a computer, has no support for status messages, limits messages to 160 characters, and costs money to use? What IM protocol has trouble beating that?

    9. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlimited text is a lot cheaper than unlimited data. Teenagers typically can't afford unlimited data plans. Their parents however, can get unlimited text for the whole family for very cheap.

    10. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by moogied · · Score: 1

      Ones NOT built into every phone sold in the last 10 years.
      Genius.

      --
      So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    11. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Except for slashdot users most people don't spend that much time at their computer and a single platform is more intuitive for them. SMS messages are automatically split and re-assembled so size is irrelevant. Teens will have unlimited plans so cost is not a concern.

      SMS also doesn't have to deal with inability to receive offline messages, server reconnects/disconnects, multiple formats for sending non-text data and so on.

    12. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      How many people use IM on their smartphones? I don't know a single person who does. Its SMS/MMS/Twitter/Facebook et all all the way.

      I'm sure though its only a matter of time before IM functionality is incorporated since the phone is based on cloud services anyway.. instead of an "app for that" it will be a "cloud service" for that.

      I really like the fact that MS is consuming external services and publishing them to end users rather than re-inventing them.. can't say the same for google buzzzzzz

    13. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      limits messages to 160 characters

      The 90s called and it wants its cell phone back.

      Actually I think the 90s was the last time I had a cell phone with no calendar.

    14. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      real people pay 5 dollars for unlimited texting.

    15. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIM has the ability to send IMs over SMS.

    16. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the carriers want to lose that revenue stream? I'm sure they'd ALL like to ban IM on their phones, just to drive more traffic onto the SMS network.

    17. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by mirix · · Score: 1

      The planet where you can send an SMS to anyone on earth with a $20 phone and a few cents of credit, no matter if they're in Tibet, Zimbabwe, or Siberia.

      Not everyone has a phone that can run an IM client. My phone can, but I don't run one because data rates are mind-numbingly insanely fucking high here.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    18. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

      In all products you have to balance features with time available. Some features are going to get cut, especially if there's an alternative that is just as good already in place (SMS).

      That's not to say that those features couldn't be added at a later time, especially since this device, unlike the iphone, supports over-the-air updates. Features will evolve over time as the feedback comes in from users.

      (Disclaimer: I work on the KIN team.)

    19. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I know people that have been using various IM protocols on their phones for years.

      Very very very non-technically inclined people.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    20. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      IM clients (that require a data plan) cut into text message profits. If only they could get away with $0.25/1kb on a data plan.

    21. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      No, but everyone who reads Slashdot has an internet device capable of instant messaging, even if they ARE in Zimbabwe.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    22. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by adolf · · Score: 1

      But unlimited data (ala unlimited IM) includes unlimited Intarwebs, which is something that I want anyway.

      However, I don't want unlimited texting.

      (Pro tip to anyone not yet clued in: Google Voice on an Android phone can do SMS for free.)

    23. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SMS > IM.

      SMS survives only because there are people without data plans.. People who have a data plan often add in small SMS plan to their phone because they have some friends who still don't have a data plan.. as data plans increase, there will be less people who do this.. I pay a little extra for SMS, but not for much longer.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    24. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's hilarious. SMS is obscenely expensive, very unreliable, limited to phones, and very expensive. Yes, expensive is in there twice for a reason.

    25. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Not saying anything about final product, but do recall that to this day, iPhones have no official IM client.

    26. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      My (Windows Mobile) phone came with an IM application that does AIM, ICQ, and Yahoo, and with the free Windows Live app it also does MSN.

      The last time I logged into either of these was when I got the phone to see if it really worked. And it did. But that was it.

      SMS is so far suprior to IM, it's not even funny.

      --
      -David
    27. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by strstr · · Score: 1

      Funny thing, IM on cellphones uses your text messages rather than data...

    28. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      You like expensive?

    29. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      the IM protocol which you cannot easily use on a computer

      This is a phone, for people not lugging their computer around with them.

      has no support for status messages

      But you can send them the text at any time, without worrying if they're online or not.

      messages to 160 characters

      Um, not it doesn't, not unless you have an ancient phone from 10 years ago.

      and costs money to use?

      Data costs money to use too. Depending on your plan, texts might be cheaper (for me on PAYG, a text costs 10p each, so per unit data it seems more expensive - but if I just use Internet, I get a flat 50p charge straight away. So if I'm only sending one message that day, it's still cheaper. For people who use it a lot, as pointed out, plans with lots of free texts may be cheaper than plans with free Internet).

      I can use IM on my 5800 fine, but I still send texts, and have yet to use IM, in fact.

    30. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, expensive is in there twice for a reason.

      False. This depends on your price plan, and also other factors such as how many you're sending.

    31. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Go ahead. Compare any price plan with what you could use IM for. Remember, unlimited doesn't mean unlimited.

      For example, I have 2500 messages per month. It costs me $15 to get that (it's not available unbundled). That's actually the maximum plan my carrier offers, BTW. 2500 SMS messages adds up to about 400 KB. Even at the extortionary international roaming data rates my carrier charges (the highest data rates I could find from them at 3 cents / KB) that would cost you $12 AND you wouldn't suddenly get charged 25 times more if you went over the limit, and would get charged less if you didn't hit the limit.

      Of course, if you were actually paying that data rate you'd be in another country and then texts would be a minimum of 50 cents each no matter what plan you were on so those 2500 messages would actually cost you $1250 compared to the $12 they would cost by IM.

      I suppose the closest case would be if you were going to send one text (15 cents). That would probably cost you the whole 3 cents for 1 KB of data because the phone company only rounds up.

    32. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      IM is basically worthless if you have SMS.

      SMS > IM.

      Let me correct you.

      On my plan, SMS costs me money, Sure, I get like 300 free, but then they are like 20 cents each.

      IM would go over data, which I pay a monthly fee on.

      So, what you are saying is that your comment is worthless because you are only thinking of yourself.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    33. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Not on mine, it doesn't.

      I mean, yeah: I could set it up that way. But I don't. It's much, much cleaner, simpler, and to the point to run a real IM client, communicating over TCP/IP, on a computer that thinks it's a phone, than to deal with any IM-to-SMS hodgepodgery.

    34. Re:"very good messaging phones"... by jabithew · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are complaining about SMS being expensive. I suspect this poster is in the UK or EU, but here in the UK an unlimited SMS plan costs the same as a data plan on most carriers and contracts (3 being the possible exception).

      A data plan is only useful really if you have a smartphone. 1GB of WAP browsing? Thanks but not thanks. People here are still more likely to have a large or unlimited text allowance than a data plan, though that probably won't continue for much longer with the explosion of smartphones.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  3. Way to go by Kranerian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "These phones have no downloadable apps, no games, not even a calendar. They're not meant to be expandable smart phones; instead very good messaging phones."

    Nice job, Microsoft. Way to ignore the growing trends in favor of your own way. After all, you certainly know better than those lousy consumers.

    In all fairness, though, they'll probably sell like hotcakes in the niche market they're designed for. I just don't see it as a very big market.

    --
    Do you have any idea how long it takes to dig graves for twenty-three oak trees?
    1. Re:Way to go by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      In all fairness, though, they'll probably sell like hotcakes in the niche market they're designed for.

      They'll be the first (and last) phone which has MILEY in its A9 dictionary.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Way to go by grub · · Score: 1

      T9 T9 T9... oops.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Way to go by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tweens and Teens sounds like a pretty big market to me. Depending on the price they'll either do alright or fail miserably. If Jr want's a $200 smart phone but one of these can be had for $50 you can bet there's going to be a lot of parents that take something like this as a compromise. If the options are spend $400 (+$30 per month) or something at a more reasonable price that gets by with a smaller data plan, parents will jump all over it (lest they be labeled 'bad parents' by their kids for not getting them what they want).

      Time will tell, we don't really know enough about the phones to say much at the moment. To me they look like the almost-but-not-quite smart phones that are already on the market today. MS might be too late to the party to see major sales.

    4. Re:Way to go by ipquickly · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope this device will be as successful as the zune.

      It's running zunes os after-all.

    5. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Nice job, Microsoft.

      Nice pun, Kranerian.

    6. Re:Way to go by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In all fairness, though, they'll probably sell like hotcakes in the niche market they're designed for. I just don't see it as a very big market.

      I'm guessing that niche is "parents who can be convinced by advertising that they're buying what their kids want".

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Way to go by painandgreed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "These phones have no downloadable apps, no games, not even a calendar. They're not meant to be expandable smart phones; instead very good messaging phones."

      Nice job, Microsoft. Way to ignore the growing trends in favor of your own way. After all, you certainly know better than those lousy consumers.

      In all fairness, though, they'll probably sell like hotcakes in the niche market they're designed for. I just don't see it as a very big market.

      Actually, it's probably a good move for the same reasons that the iPhone was a good move. Smartphones, while growing still aren't the majority of the market. Lots of people want "just a phone". Kids, however, want messaging, but the parents that pay for it probably don't want smart phone fees or for that matter, connection to the internet. There was a story on /. just yesterday by a parent asking how to filter his teenage kids access to the internet. It seems like a perfectly valid market that is probably no more niche than smartphones. Not everybody needs or wants a smart phone, and I'm sure there are plenty of people who want a messaging phone. I think the real test will be if it followed good design and they are indeed "very good messaging phones."

    8. Re:Way to go by ion++ · · Score: 1

      Why? We consumers are better off with increased competition.

    9. Re:Way to go by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm guessing that niche is "parents who can be convinced by advertising that they're buying what their kids want".

      It worked for Lee Carvallo's Putting Challenge...

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    10. Re:Way to go by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      In the UK you get better phones free with a pay as you go plan. If your offering is worse than free, then you've lost, badly.

    11. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this is going to be that it'll need some sort of data plan in order to be useful. And, as someone already pointed out, this thing's going to need reasonably decent parts. That interface which looks like a fucked graphics card running at 640x480x4 bit also has to compete with low-end Android phones, which have a UI looking like their expensive counterparts.

      With that age group though, it all boils down to marketing. And MS is going to need a lot of it with the iPhone currently being the 'in' thing.

    12. Re:Way to go by McBeer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "These phones have no downloadable apps, no games, not even a calendar. They're not meant to be expandable smart phones; instead very good messaging phones."

      Nice job, Microsoft. Way to ignore the growing trends in favor of your own way. After all, you certainly know better than those lousy consumers.

      I was talking to my 23 year old sister about this phone. Here's an interesting snippet

      [17:02] Sister: it looks cool
      [17:02] Sister: too bad it's not sprint
      [17:03] Me: Yeah. It'll be interesting to see what price details emerge this month
      [17:03] Sister: it's cool you don't have to get apps for it, the features are built in
      [17:03] Me: haha all the nerds are holding that against it
      [17:04] Sister: and the camera capability is good!
      [17:04] Sister: i don't want to have to hunt around for 20 apps
      [17:04] Sister: it would work right away

      Not only did she not care about the lack of app store, she saw it as a bonus. It looks like MSFT was definitely listening to a consumer segment when they designed the phone. It will be interesting to see just how many people like my sister there are out there.

      --
      Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    13. Re:Way to go by Knara · · Score: 1

      In the US you have a very limited selection when it comes to phones that come with pay-as-you-go plans, usually necessitating that you spend about ~$50 a decent non-free phone, and they rape you for texting.

    14. Re:Way to go by MBCook · · Score: 1

      At this point, an iPhone one generation removed (currently the 3G, by the end of the summer the 3GS) can be had for $100, brand new.

      They are going to have to go for the $0-$25 after subsidy market if they want to use price. The Palm Pre is pretty cheap, and has many of these features. There is always a Blackberry that is basically free.

      It's an interesting little phone, but it seems like it is a feature phone that should have come out a year or so ago.

      In fact, it seems like it would be most interested if not positioned as a smart phone, and thus something you could buy without having to get the $20 or $30 per month data plan. But without that, you can't surf, so you just have a phone with SMS and a keyboard, which are available for free.

      All that said, it's nice to see someone try to sell a phone that isn't positioned as an iPhone killer. They clearly went down a different road here.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    15. Re:Way to go by jaymzter · · Score: 4, Funny

      It will be interesting to see just how many people like my sister there are out there.

      Yes, but is she hot?

      --
      If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    16. Re:Way to go by pseudofrog · · Score: 1

      Android phones and (I believe) the iPhone can do everything this phone can do out-of-the-box, and more. The apps just allow you to _further_ expand the phones capabilities.

    17. Re:Way to go by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Best combination of Post & Sig I've seen in a while.

    18. Re:Way to go by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Don't rain on his idiot sister's parade. You can tell that she's proud to be dumb.

    19. Re:Way to go by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tits or GTFO.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    20. Re:Way to go by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      so she'd spend money on this because its an advantage, that the phone can't do more than what $10 phones could do 10 years ago?

      your sister is pretty dumb...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    21. Re:Way to go by pitdingo · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft is a horrible company and should die?

      Let's see, just recently...bribing and stacking ISO to get their terrible MSOOXML format certified, endless FUD against GNU/Linux in regards to patents, funding Openmainframe.org to sue IBM, funding SCO to sue IBM and Novell over Linux patents, shamelessly copying everything Apple does (Mac OS, iPod, iPhone, iPad, etc...), thwarting competition and interoperability at every step, charging consumers over and over again for the same OS, and i can go all night with this...

    22. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what are these going to compete with? Messages in a bottle? Pigeons? Happy Meal Toys?

    23. Re:Way to go by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Android phones and (I believe) the iPhone can do everything this phone can do out-of-the-box, and more.

      That's not really the point. If you buy an Android phone or iPhone, then your friends with the same phone will be constantly pointing out cool applications that offer more than what came out of the box. And to teenagers and some young adults, this starts to eat away at their self-esteem if they can't keep up. With a phone that doesn't offer the possibility for expansion, they have one less social pressure to worry about.

    24. Re:Way to go by fractoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tweens and Teens sounds like a pretty big market to me.

      Yeah, I was looking at that...

      • Marketed specifically at teenage girls
      • Camera that can shoot 720p video
      • LED flash / light for shooting in low light
      • The frequency with which stupid teenage girls already take nude pix of themselves

      This phone is specifically designed to increase the supply of questionable-legal-age teen pron.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    25. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so she'd spend money on this because its an advantage, that the phone can't do more than what $10 phones could do 10 years ago? your sister is pretty dumb...

      There is no other phone on the market today (let alone 10 years ago) that supports all the features of the Kin out of the box for any price. Admittedly my sister isn't a cell phone guru, but that's because she's a speech language pathologist and doesn't really give a shit about geeking out about cell phones. You are equally misinformed yet don't have any such excuse.

    26. Re:Way to go by brillow · · Score: 1

      How do these thinks MS does affect you in any way? Who CARES if they get some sub-par file standard through? Its not making anyone use it, if it sucks no one will use it. If no one uses it, then at most MS wasted their money. I don't care if MS spreads FUD about linux, I use linux when I need to anyway. I don't care if they sue people over linux patents, I haven't seen any of these suits result in a hampering of linux development AT ALL. Companies sue over patents so they can SETTLE and set up a patent sharing agreement, you very rarely see any company axe a product as a result of a patent suit. As for copying Apple, great! I like Apple's stuff, why not copy it and sell it to me cheaper and make it PC compatible. I am all about that. Its so silly when geeks get worked up over MS and the stuff they do, stuff that doesn't affect you at all.

    27. Re:Way to go by brillow · · Score: 1

      Thats a very interesting take on apps. Apps are just features that aren't built in and you have to pay for.

    28. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sister is very dim. I suspect the only thing she's good at is sucking a boat load of dicks.

    29. Re:Way to go by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, until the next facebook/twitter comes along in a few months. Since it doesn't have a built in app for that, will she still love it?

    30. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sexist moron

    31. Re:Way to go by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      What a load of BS. If anything they'll get picked on for having a fugly unpopular phone not because they have fewer apps.

    32. Re:Way to go by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      10 years is a bit much but it was 5 maybe 6 years ago my Sony phone could do music, pics, video and RSS feeds. Sure its interface was more standard and video wasn't HD but it had the mobile provider's "app store" so arguably it did much more than these phones and it wasn't a smart phone either.

    33. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat Lesbian

    34. Re:Way to go by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > This phone is specifically designed to increase the supply of questionable-legal-age teen pron.

      You say that as if it's a bad thing.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    35. Re:Way to go by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Yes, until she wants an app for some random, obvious functionality that isn't included.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    36. Re:Way to go by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Ah, such is the tragedy of the ambiguity of text.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    37. Re:Way to go by doogledog · · Score: 1

      Sad. I wonder how this thread would have differed (not just the parent's post but some of the other replies) if the GP had said 'I was talking to my 23 year old brother'.
      Sorry, off-topic I know, and no I'm not new here (just lurked for years before signing up).

      Someone mentioned the phone's ability to receive OTA firmware updates... I guess that means that in future they could decide to implement the ability to install other applications. As it is, from the start, having a load of functionality out of the box that you wouldn't normally have does seem like a plus. But with the ability for the firmware to be updated, nothing is set in stone.

    38. Re:Way to go by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      In the US you have a very limited selection when it comes to phones that come with pay-as-you-go plans, usually necessitating that you spend about ~$50 a decent non-free phone, and they rape you for texting.

      Right now I can get an LG 290c from Tracfone for $29. It has a 1.3 Megapixel camera & Bluetooth--neither are great, but they're nice to have. It's a "double minutes" phone, so it costs $.10 per minute to talk, $.03 per text message. You can get 100 minutes for $10, which is pretty reasonable. We got our kids tracfones on a family plan, if they needed more than the 60 minutes we gave them (which allows for 200 text messages), they had to buy their own minutes. That helps to curtail the cost quite a bit.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    39. Re:Way to go by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

      Buy me BoneStorm!

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard
    40. Re:Way to go by Tak_1 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we all wish Microsoft the best of luck with this, and I am sure it will be every bit the market leader that has made Zune a household word.

      ****This statement is sarcasm****

      "Sarcasm tag provided by the League to aid the sarcasm impaired, you may be sarcasm impaired and not even know it"

    41. Re:Way to go by ipquickly · · Score: 1

      Who CARES if they get some sub-par file standard through? Its not making anyone use it, if it sucks no one will use it. If no one uses it, then at most MS wasted their money.

      I really wish that was the case.

      Imagine you're the boss, and you can make your 100 subordinates use whatever software you want. You don't need to use this software yourself, so you don't really care if it has a 'devilish' EULA.

      Now a guy from company A comes to you. He has a better, more open and not locking-in product.
      Then a guy from company B comes in. His product has the same price as the previous guys product, but is closed and makes you have to sign your (companies) life away. But he invites you to his yacht in the summer.

      You will have the best summer of your life.
      Meanwhile your subordinates will suffer and use software (and a file format) that is making the world worse for linux.

    42. Re:Way to go by brillow · · Score: 1

      Well then the subordinate should either just do their job or quit. If the lost productivity due to the standard is substantial the company will suffer for his bad descision. (and any company which allows a suit to make such decisions deserves to suffer) I could care less if Linux is better off. Linux will grow based on it's own merits as it always has.

    43. Re:Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. "My parents bought it for me." See, what you have is not your personal choice at that age, what you do with it is.

  4. Driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love the teens driving vid on the kin.com site.

    I just can't wait!

  5. Designed to Fail by gdavidp · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So with peer pressure today, what kid in their right mind is going to want this phone? It isn't an iPhone or a BlackBerry... This will be a failure, just like the Zune.

    1. Re:Designed to Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Kids don't use blackberries.

    2. Re:Designed to Fail by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Your projecting your needs onto teens. Worst kind of marketing mistake. Not sure if you've noticed, but teens haven't been buying smart phones. Text messaging, sending pictures/audio/video, those are their core needs. Most cheap phones do that. Toss in the ability to browse Facebook or whatever, play some music, store embarrassing pictures of friends and you've got them covered. Email and dozens of apps are extras not really needed. So why would a teen get an iPhone, much less a Blackberry? If you've got the money, sure, go for a true smart phone for the coolness factor if that's your thing. If money matters, these are very cleverly positioned. If anything kills them, it's the MS connection.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:Designed to Fail by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything kills them, it's the MS connection.

      Why would the tween-teen market give a damn about the geek's distate for anything Microsoft?

    4. Re:Designed to Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything kills them, it's the MS connection.

      Why would the tween-teen market give a damn about the geek's distate for anything Microsoft?

      Maybe because they saw the zune and compared it to the iPod?

    5. Re:Designed to Fail by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Why would the tween-teen market give a damn about the geek's distate for anything Microsoft?

      It's not just the tween-teen market - The market in general doesn't give a damn about geekdom's hate on for "M$." Hell, I read /. regularly, and even I'm astounded at the amount of energy the /. universe puts into hating M$. If only they could put that energy into getting a haircut, some nice shoes and meeting a girl...

    6. Re:Designed to Fail by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      So why would a teen get an iPhone

      Because iPhones are cool, and kids want to be cool and have cool stuff. It really is that simple. Different example, from a few decades ago: Levis 501 jeans with the red tag were the only cool, acceptable jeans in my school. Wearing something like Toughskins from Sears would get you laughed at, and possibly beaten just for the fun of it because there was a reasonable certainty that the kid in them was a lot less tough than the jeans themselves.

      I shudder at the memories ...

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    7. Re:Designed to Fail by dskzero · · Score: 1

      So you are decreeing that this phone will not be cool? because it looks like a very easy phone to use, abuse, and gift to the kids to make them feel they have something interesting to mess up their social lives wherever they go, like adults do! That _is_ cool!

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    8. Re:Designed to Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything kills them, it's the MS connection.

      Just like the MS connection killed the xbox.

      What kid could possibly want an xbox since it's from Microsoft?

      Oh wait.

    9. Re:Designed to Fail by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Every teenager I know has or wants a smartphone. Observing around my younger cousins and the kids at church, most have an iPhone, if they don't they have an iPod Touch and pretend to have an iPhone except when making actual phone calls. A few have a Blackberry because there was an offer in the UK last year to get one really cheaply and they have most of the features of an iPhone without the pretty. Apps are big, it's the ideal pocket-money purchase.

    10. Re:Designed to Fail by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Teens have definitely been buying iPhones around here. Blackberrys not so much.

    11. Re:Designed to Fail by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      They don't. What they give a damn about is Microsoft's reputation as a lame, stodgy computer company that looks like that dork John Hodgeman. (As opposed to that other, cool company.)

      --
      The cake is a pie
    12. Re:Designed to Fail by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What they give a damn about is Microsoft's reputation as a lame, stodgy computer company that looks like that dork John Hodgeman.

      And conversely, the fake "social" bullshit they do when trying to market their products and being cool and edgy. As if buying a Microsoft product will suddenly transport you to wild parties where everyone is having the time of their lives.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    13. Re:Designed to Fail by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      They should. The CrackBerry 8900 is *amazingly* slick and usable. I used it for thirty seconds and I want one - the only phone I've ever been able to use my Gmail on *comfortably*. The loved one appears to have had it surgically grafted to her left hand. They're called CrackBerries for a reason.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    14. Re:Designed to Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they didn't even see the Zune.

    15. Re:Designed to Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put that energy into getting a haircut, some nice shoes and meeting a girl...

      Kindly stop peering into my windows while I'm posting on Slashdot. Thank you!

    16. Re:Designed to Fail by brillow · · Score: 1

      Most HS kids I interact with don't have (or want) an iPhone. In fact, they told me yesterday my iPad was lame and I was lame for buying it.

    17. Re:Designed to Fail by brillow · · Score: 1

      They actually do, surprisingly. I would say in my HS there are about as many BB's as iPhones. They don't buy it BECAUSE its a blackberry, but because they have generally nice full keyboards for the texting they love to do.

    18. Re:Designed to Fail by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      And conversely, the fake "social" bullshit they do when trying to market their products and being cool and edgy. As if buying a Microsoft product will suddenly transport you to wild parties where everyone is having the time of their lives.

      Beer companies have been doing this for years... It seems to have worked well so far! (not that beer really needs advertising to begin with...)

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    19. Re:Designed to Fail by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Well, firstly, beer and parties tend to go together. Nobody has wild parties over mobile phones. Secondly, I haven't seen a beer ad like that for years, could you point me to one? Most beer ads these days tend to go for the post-modern irony angle, rather than the "you're the coolest person in the world!!!" approach.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:Designed to Fail by Tak_1 · · Score: 1

      True enough, every time I get a little snicker out of the continued absence of Zunes and I kid about it with a non-geek, the answer I receive 90% of the time is "Whats a Zune?" That really does take the fun out of it. No schadenfreude to be had there.

      Most non geeks I've spoken to have never even heard of a Zune. The only thing that seems to have failed worse for Microsoft than Zune, was Microsoft's marketing department.

  6. Seriously? by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just can't take these products seriously. Instead of this niche marketing, microsoft needs to focus on something with broad appeal. There's a reason iPhone beat them in that space, and this is exactly it.

    --
    Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      microsoft needs to focus on something with broad appeal. There's a reason iPhone beat them in that space, and this is exactly it.

      It appeals to broads?

    2. Re:Seriously? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It appeals to broads?

      Welcome to the 21st century, Mr. Chandler!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up!! Mod up!!

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, how would Microsoft do that? They just don't have a history of delivering an market-winning product into a strongly competed field. It's not what they're good at.

      Xbox worked because game consoles have captive games. Windows works because of equivalent lock-in. How do they do that in phones, without ending up with another Zune?

    5. Re:Seriously? by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't Xbox lose money still?

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    6. Re:Seriously? by rev_sanchez · · Score: 1

      I think it's so much worse than that. With the Zune/HD and and it's new phone offerings Microsoft is trying to out-Apple Apple and they are terrible at it. Not only do they come out with hardware that is a generation behind what Apple has out in the market:
      - big old iPod (a few years later) big old Zune
      - skinny iPod (a few years later) skinny Zune
      - iPod touch (a couple of years later) Zune HD
      - iPhone (a couple of years later) this thing

      Not only are they late to market copycats but they don't execute nearly as well as Apple. While the hardware is arguely a bit better in the Zune HD compared to an iPod touch there aren't many apps for it because they've made it nearly as hard, if not harder, for third parties to release apps for the Zune HD and they don't have the marketshare to pull off that kind of douchebaggery. The postion they should have taken is what Google did with the Nexus 1 and make it easier to develop and release software for it. One of Microsoft/PC strengths in the early days was that it was a more open development platform than what Apple had to offer.

      I don't think there is real hope of Microsoft's new phone really competing with the iPhone or Nexus 1 but if they really want to make a go of it get then they need mindshare. To do that they start with the Zune HD if that's the platform they're going to build on by adding a microphone, adding speech to text, sponsoring a Skype client, adding a camera, and give developers something more interesting to do than make yet another twitter client.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    7. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No.

    8. Re:Seriously? by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Microsoft provides the OS and Cloud Computing infrastructure. Sharp provides the phone.

      I personally thing this is pretty cool. Its not the best device by any means but it has great utility and if verizon can sell an affordable plan this phone makes perfect sense for people who want twitter, facebook, zune and the excellent camera features.

      This also puts MS head over heals above every other smartphone company out there in terms of cloud computing and infrastructure. Instead of downloading "an app for that" the cloud simply integrates the service and consumes it and presents it to the users of these devices.

      I know my niece and nephew will get one to replace their phones just for the zune service alone.

    9. Re:Seriously? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      That’s like saying that the drooling cripple in the wheelchair beats the coma patient in ultimate fighting. ^^
      Wait until that cute 800 pound gorilla called Nokia gets in the ring to give them a “hug” of the particularly cuddly kind. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    10. Re:Seriously? by brillow · · Score: 1

      No, broad appeal is why the Zune failed. The secret to competing is NOT TO COMPETE. Apple saw a lot of really poorly done MP3 players and made the best one. MS sees a lot of really poorly done featurephones and is going to make the best one. Its SILLY to try and "kill the iPhone." I think actually the Kin is going to be a big help to Zune. (assuming it sells well, which is entirely dependent on these phones being very nearly free on contract and having a very affordable dataplan) EVERY KIN IS A ZUNE. And once people understand how awesome zunepass is, they won't go back. Parents will like it too as they won't have to shell out money all the time for itunes music.

    11. Re:Seriously? by spintriae · · Score: 1

      microsoft needs to focus on something with broad appeal.

      Like what? An operating system? A web browser? An office suite? Help me out here.

  7. Doesn't really make sense... by nweaver · · Score: 1

    It has all the costs to make of any other smartphone, because OS wise it is a smartphone. So it can't be cheaper than any other smartphone.

    If anything, its more expensive because there is no app-related revenue.

    So how does Microsoft expect to compete? Just lose more money at something?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Doesn't really make sense... by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suspect that since it has no downloadable apps, that "bleeding edge" isnt really a concern.

      Only needs a CPU good enough to run the included apps. Probably dont even need a GPU. With application control, you also get reliable antialiasing (only fonts that look good included) so perhaps a regular 100DPI display may be good enough (iphones and recent ipods sport a 200DPI display, if I am not mistaken,) the battery probably wont need to be nearly as good, the memory probably doesnt need to be nearly as fast either...

      There are probably lots of ways to cut costs here without sacrificing much beyond that initial sacrifice: no downloadable apps

      The iphone reportedly costs ~$200 in parts

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  8. Microsoft has lost it by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whatever they do now seems to be a pale caricature of reality... why is this the case?
    Were they always this clueless?

    It's sad... so much talent.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Microsoft has lost it by AlexBirch · · Score: 0, Troll

      They tried to innovate instead of imitate.
      Microsoft is amazing at imitation: word, excel, powerpoint, X-Box, C#, Windows, etc. When Microsoft imitates, they are second to none. What happens when they innovate, they end up with Vista, instead of copying OS X with 7.

      My all-time favorite creations are the Zune and Clippy.

    2. Re:Microsoft has lost it by fermion · · Score: 1
      It is because they are often late to the party. Nearly every Apple product, at least since the iPod mini, has has designer packaging that seriously encourages the unpacking video. Such videos provides tons of cheap advertising. As a company that is trying to be more environmentally friendly, OEM packaging would be both cheaper and make greenpeace happier, but at a large loss of the package fetish crowd.

      That MS is finally tapping into some of it's tens of billion of assets to make a pretty product seems more of a desperate attempt to save a otherwise failed product than a genuine attempt to create a bold product. If they would have done somthing like this for xBox, it might have had some meaning.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Microsoft has lost it by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What are you referring to, specifically? Would you say the same thing about, say, Motorola had they introduced a phone with this featureset and form-factor?

      I mean, I agree that I don't find this announcement compelling, but then again I'm also not the audience for the phone.

      I'm also all for griping about Microsoft, but at least give us some substance! What about this announcement are we supposed to hate, exactly?

    4. Re:Microsoft has lost it by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I fail to see your line between new creation and imitation...

      You could say Word is an imitation of WordPerfect... However Word wasn't popular until it went to Windows where Word Perfect needed to catch up and make their product work for windows.
      The same with Excel and Lotus 123
      C# a language like Java which is a language like C++ which is like C... How about the success of Visual Basic?
      Vista was a copy of a lot of OS X elements and building off of XP, the problems they had was poor implementation, not poor innovation.
      Zune was a copy of an iPod.
      Clippy was taken from Bob, But an animated helper has been though of for a long time but it needed resources to do such.

      Most inovation is from building on existing ideas and technology, based on problems with the older designed. I havn't seen any tech come out that makes me go wow that is beyond anything I could ever imagine.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Microsoft has lost it by dangitman · · Score: 1

      OEM packaging would be both cheaper and make greenpeace happier, but at a large loss of the package fetish crowd.

      Say what? Apple has been a pioneer at reducing packaging. It may be "designer" but it is also minimalist. While other computer and software companies were shipping product in huge boxes with lots of wasted space, Apple was making the packaging smaller and smaller. Examples: is there any desktop computer that uses less packaging than a Mac mini? Or any desktop-and-display combo that uses less than an iMac? iPod Nanos come in boxes smaller than a packet of cigarettes.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Microsoft has lost it by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What about this announcement are we supposed to hate, exactly?

      Have you seen the website for this product? Enough to make you want to poke your eyes out with a fork, and pierce your eardrums with a knitting needle.

      Also, doesn't 'knit together... kindred spirits' activate your gag reflex? Something very strange is going on with Microsoft marketing. First "The Social" for the Zune, and now this. It's like Microsoft wants you to think of your electronic devices as your best friend or something, rather than a useful tool. It's just over the top how they are trying to infuse "funky" into their products, like they are over-compensating for their historically straight-laced nerdy-businessman image.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Microsoft has lost it by russotto · · Score: 1

      It's just over the top how they are trying to infuse "funky" into their products, like they are over-compensating for their historically straight-laced nerdy-businessman image.

      A staple of sitcom humor is an adult trying to use the slang that his kids use in order to sound "cool". Never works, of course. This is pretty much the same thing.

  9. Potential... by DevStar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I first saw the phones I thought "loser". I was comparing it to the iPhone, Nexus One, WP7, etc...

    But then it became more apparent that it's competing against the EnV and the Rage. What Verizon calls MultiMedia phones. It will likely be on the lower priced data plan (or maybe they'll make one between teh $10 and $30/month package). Given a choice between an EnV or a Kin, the Kin is an easy choice. If MS were to clean up the multimedia phone space at Verizon, I think you'll suddenly begin to see a new market emerge. Although it's a surprisingly tough market, because I think a lot of it hinges on the data center and carrier integration.
    Watch how this plays out. I think it possibly flops, but could be iPhone like huge, but to a totally different market.

    1. Re:Potential... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can see is the lack of flexibility that kills it. Right now Twitter and Facebook are all the rage but a few years ago, it was myspace. The smartphones are flexible so that you can just get another app. What will happen to the users of this phone if the social networks change?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Potential... by wjousts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What will happen to the users of this phone if the social networks change?

      Not a problem, most kids will trade in their phones every couple of years of so anyway.

    3. Re:Potential... by trcooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. There is a lot more to the mobile phone market than the high-end smart phone. Compared to any smart phone these two devices can't compete. But against the EnV, Backflip, etc I'd say they're more than interesting. I think the low to mid end of the mobile phone market is under-served with quality devices, there's a plethora of phones out there, but very few that are any good.

      If these phones are executed well, they could definitely fill a gap in the market.

      What I find most interesting about them is the ability to use a Zune Pass to download OTA. Either you're into music subscriptions or you're not, but I'm perfectly happy with the model and have used Rhapsody for years now. VZW currently has a rhapsody app for phones, but you can't use your to-go subscription to download songs OTA, and to rub salt in the wound it's something like 1.99 to purchase a song you can buy on your PC for .99. If you can download OTA for 'free' that could really increase the appeal of these phones.

      Yeah, the phone is underwhelming if you're looking at it along with Android devices and the iPhone. The thing is, not everyone is, and phones like this are going to have appeal to people who are looking one tier below a smart phone.

    4. Re:Potential... by dskzero · · Score: 1

      I doubt the phone would last until the next 2.0 rage in the hands of anyone who will buy it. They will get another phone by then (KIN 3?).

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    5. Re:Potential... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I can see is the lack of flexibility that kills it. Right now Twitter and Facebook are all the rage but a few years ago, it was myspace. The smartphones are flexible so that you can just get another app. What will happen to the users of this phone if the social networks change?

      With the target audience for this phone ("The phones are designed to appeal to social-networking focused teens...") that is irrelevant. A phone that is more than 6-12 mo old is past due to be replaced.

    6. Re:Potential... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I actually kind of like this, coming from Microsoft.

      Here's the thing: for the past decade or so, I haven't been a huge fan of Microsoft. They're big and lumbering and sloppy. One of the things I've commented on here before is how Microsoft's design philosophy is different from Apple's, and how Apple's is basically better. The short version: Apple's first release of a device is relatively simple, but very well put together and targeted toward specific uses and maybe even a specific audience, and then they add new features and evolve the device over time, giving an excellent user experience. Microsoft, on the other hand, tends to try to cram every possible thing into the first generation of their device, and it's such a big mess that it has to be redesigned, have bad features stripped out, etc. As a result, Microsoft earned a reputation for having their products be completely unusable until v.4, and even then you want to wait for SP1.

      So to me, it's refreshing to see some discipline and restraint in the design for a Microsoft product. I want to say, "Yes, don't put in every single feature you can think of and the kitchen sink. Start by making sure that whatever the device does, it does it well. Build from there."

  10. Slashdot late as ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article has clearly been posted 12 days late. Good one though.

  11. Kin dle? by AtlantaSteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We know that Apple protects their branding to a ridiculous degree... essentially arguing that any name with an "i" in front it threatens their intellectual property. So I wonder if Amazon will have anything to say about this new product? If I saw a news story about the "Kin Two", and the headline didn't qualify it as a Microsoft thing, my first assumption would be that it's a new version of Amazon's ebook reader.

    1. Re:Kin dle? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should swap the 'Kin' and 'One' around. Rename it the "One Kin". People wont know what you are 'Two Kin' about. Just wait for the 'Four Kin'.

      Maybe then we can have the Microsoft 'fucking' and 'wanking' phones.

    2. Re:Kin dle? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Now you have kindled my dreams for a product from somebody named "it".

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Kin dle? by grub · · Score: 1


      Amazon would have sued had Microsoft used their original name Kin Dull

      .

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Kin dle? by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

      Two things. And I call them
      Kin One and Kin Two.
      These Things will not bite you.
      They want to have fun."
      Then, out of the box
      Came Kin Two and Kin One

      And Sally and I
      Did not know what to do.
      So we had to take hand
      Of Kin One and Kin Two.
      We took them in our hand.
      But our fish said, "No! No!
      Those Things should not be
      In this house! Make them go!
      "They should not be here
      When your mother is not!
      Put them out! Put them out!"
      Said the fish in the pot.

    5. Re:Kin dle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see we have the following words: Pink, Kin, Two and One.

      Hmmm...what can we do with that?

      "Two in the Pink and One in its Kin"

    6. Re:Kin dle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could market it to Rednecks and call it the 'Pump Kin'. ;-)

    7. Re:Kin dle? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      They'd better come with a calculatus eliminatus app.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Kin dle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 'Three Kin' out man!

    9. Re:Kin dle? by tangelogee · · Score: 0

      ...but I'm 'eight Kin' to hear more!

    10. Re:Kin dle? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      the WAN Kin phone being the VoIP model? I can see a lot of businesses being interested in the wankin phone then....

    11. Re:Kin dle? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Kin'ell is a popular phrase in these parts. It is obviously short for Fucking Hell. Well done Microsoft.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    12. Re:Kin dle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean eliminator calculatoris?

    13. Re:Kin dle? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Karlos K. Krinkelbein, is that you? Are you still upset Klaus got that gig on Fox and not you?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  12. Kin? Pink? by Rantastic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me, or do the marketing folks at Microsoft have some serious deficiencies when it comes to naming products? Lets not forget The Monad Shell.

    I guess this is what happens when they try to be creative. Otherwise everything is called either Windows, Business, or Office Something.

    --
    Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    1. Re:Kin? Pink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:
      "Active", "Direct", "Explorer", and "X"

    2. Re:Kin? Pink? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget The Monad Shell

      Wasn't Monad just a code name? Besides, what's wrong with that name? It's certainly not worse than Cairo, Chicago or Vista.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:Kin? Pink? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Monad" was actually a reasonably clever Leibniz reference. Frankly "Powershell" is far, far worse(though I suppose it dodges the "Hur, hur, it rhymes with 'Gonad shell'" problem, which is probably why the change was made).

      This "kin" stuff is just blah.

    4. Re:Kin? Pink? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      How about "Windows Phone Series 7".

      At least they didn't add "live" or "dot-net" to the name.

    5. Re:Kin? Pink? by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Just love the name. Now I can shout out WHERE'S MY 'KIN PHONE?

    6. Re:Kin? Pink? by Mia'cova · · Score: 2, Informative
    7. Re:Kin? Pink? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      This is the cellphone space. All their competitors have names like, "Envy", or "Cliq" or "Devour" or "Neon" or "Magnet" or "Curve" or "Reveal."

      Microsoft's naming here is no worse than any other cell maker.

    8. Re:Kin? Pink? by acromosh · · Score: 1

      iPhone, iLife, iMac, iMovie, iPhoto, iTunes, iPad, iWork and so on.

    9. Re:Kin? Pink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Ballmer still wants to Squirt something your way...

    10. Re:Kin? Pink? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      "Envy", or "Cliq" or "Devour" or "Neon" or "Magnet" or "Curve" or "Reveal."

      I thought those were condom brands.

      Microsoft's naming here is no worse than any other cell maker.

      Well... that's certainly an achievement to be proud of.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:Kin? Pink? by tangelogee · · Score: 0

      Is it just me, or do the marketing folks at Microsoft have some serious deficiencies when it comes to naming products? Lets not forget The Monad Shell.

      I guess this is what happens when they try to be creative. Otherwise everything is called either Windows, Business, or Office Something.

      because OS 1-9 was so original? And OSX? so they went Roman on that one...G3, G4, G5, and all the iStuff...so original on Apple's front as well.

    12. Re:Kin? Pink? by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Correct. What was Monad during development is now PowerShell, and has been called that for several years.

    13. Re:Kin? Pink? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. I stand corrected.

  13. Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobile by irreverant · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently purchased the HD2, it'd be a great phone had it not crapped out on my the third day, I would be happy with it. Android has taking a big share of the mobile market, I just hate it because it's more of a niche market - more for the social-network user - i don't care for rsa and do enjoy the windows platform; i like that i can use it as a gps modem with my laptop (ICS) some call it tethering, the only saving grace for the phone is it's huge screen which dwarfs most phones. Microsoft needs to get their "ish" together and make a reliable stable mobile platform. I don't want to choose between the iPhone, Android, or Blackberry only because no one else will step up.

    --
    Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
  14. Oh dear by minus9 · · Score: 1

    Sounds 'kin rubbish.

    Sorry it had to be done.

    1. Re:Oh dear by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

      Sorry, modded this the wrong way (down instead of up) so have to reply to clear my mod. Thought comment was funny :-)

  15. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Why Android is "more for the social-network user" compared to WinMo?

    Oh, and you can tether with both iPhone and Android.

  16. Kids these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are kids these days really SOOO obsessed with their facbook/twitter accounts that they have the urge to 'share' *everything* they encounter with their *friends*?! If so SMS/MMS work just fine for them and does not require them or their friends to have a *special* phone.
    The ads/videos are absolutely horrible - who came up with this? Feeling disconnected because you didn't have your phone for weekend? Sad.

    1. Re:Kids these days... by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      I feel disconnected when I forget my phone when I go to the bathroom. A full weekend? I'd probably kill myself.

    2. Re:Kids these days... by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

      A) Yes, some are, B) This device _uses_ SMS and MMS, so while they don't need a special phone, this one makes using SMS/MMS incredibly easy and fast, and C) You are obviously not the target market. Don't buy one.

  17. Re:8GB by dave562 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The phone takes 720p HD video. It also has speakers and so I'm going to make a wild ass guess here and suggest that it plays MP3s also.

  18. Kin by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Kin"?

    Well, at least it'll sell well in Appalachia, enabling teens to keep track of which cousins are dating which.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Kin, as in "My ****kin' phone's playin' up again"

    2. Re:Kin by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it'll sell well in Appalachia, enabling teens to keep track of which cousins are dating which.

      ExecuBot Gamma: It's funny, but is it going to get them off their tractors?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  19. Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "No apps. Less functionality than an iPhone. Lame."

    Yes, but you get something you don't get with Apple. You get abused by Microsoft.

    Is this the Windows Vista of phones, the Windows ME of phones, or the Zune of phones?

    1. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      lol what? you';re abused less by apple than MS? this is like telling X person that you like them better than Y person because they're newer.

      flavors of the same.

    2. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's like comparing getting hit in the face with a pillow to getting hit in the face with a baseball bat. One is just an annoyance, the other, not so much.

    3. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by yotto · · Score: 1

      I thought it was more like being told that you can run any app you wanted (with an asterisk saying as long as you can find it in one single store) with flat out being told that no, there really are no good apps for it.

    4. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But in Apple’s case, the pillow is filled with totalitarian control and reality distortion poison, while the MS baseball bat is of the soft kind, but infected with all kind of diseases with long incubation times.

      In other words: With MS you make your computer a zombie. An Apple computer makes a zombie out of YOU! ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the looks and the functionality I wouldn't be surprised if the phones were created by the team that came up with Bob.

      I wonder how many MS employees will chose using one of those abominations over getting sacked

    6. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by bigngamer92 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With MS you make your computer a zombie. An Apple computer makes a zombie out of YOU!

      And Google makes an index card of your information. Really good quote by the way.

      As far as the phone goes though, It sounds like they've built a very thin client for the phone, not a wise choice in my opinion, but if they can keep the cost low, then it would do exactly what a phone was made for, communication.

    7. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      With MS you make your computer a zombie. An Apple computer makes a zombie out of YOU!

      And Google makes an index card of your information. Really good quote by the way.

      Not a quote, btw. I just came up with it. But I should perhaps add, that I don’t hate anyone. “Even” Apple fans. Unfortunately, I’m told, I’m not always coming across like I intended.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many MS employees will chose using one of those abominations over getting sacked

      None. The real question is -- how many will chose one for their 11 year old daughter, for whom they might not want a fully enabled smartphone?

    9. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Tak_1 · · Score: 1

      I need to point out its Apple MOBILE devices have the lockdown, NOT the computers. And I don't have to worry about my computer being randomly shut down from defective validations. Or quirky unreliable activation keys that may, or may not work.

      My Macbook Pro, is for more open in what I can run or do than any Windows 7 "6.1" windows machine, and I'm not drowned in media company "content control". They day that Apple tries that with the actual COMPUTERS is the day my MBP gets Linux.

    10. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's never had to use Windows ME.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    11. Re:Want a higher place in heaven? Suffer now. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      "Windows Me? - Does this mean 'Windows' is now a verb?"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  20. IM Support by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks like the bet they're making is that including Facebook and Twitter support is a complete replacement for the traditional IM client. I'm not so sure that decision is so terrible from a marketing perspective. The trend I'm seeing is that old school IM clients just aren't as popular among less serious users nowadays; I get Facebook messages from all sorts of people I know would never bother getting a "real" IM account, or who have never figured out they already have one via Gmail.

    Ultimately the real limitations of this phone aren't going to apparent until the matching data plan is announced. How much it will cost to download all the Twilight ringtones and background images that will obviously be introduced for this phone? These are the important questions. So far we already know that updates from some sites are put into 15 minute batches, presumably to same on network bandwidth, which doesn't bode well.

    1. Re:IM Support by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The slightly more pessimistic hypothesis would be that IM is basically SMS; but without the length restrictions and billed as "data" rather than "text". Leaving IM out probably increases the phone's attractiveness to carriers.

      Particularly if they are trying to move this thing as a cheaper "teen" alternative to the smartphone proper(just as the sidekick was the cheaper alternative to the blackberry), they'll need carrier cooperation in the form of somewhat cheaper data plans. Leaving out IM, and thus padding SMS usage, might well be the quasi-hidden subsidy that they need to make that happen.

    2. Re:IM Support by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Remember those times in which random strangers added you constantly as a friend in your IM client? It was so annoying, a lot of people (Acquaintances or not) added you to have conversations like this one:
      - hi
      - Hey
      - wassup
      - Nothing really...
      - wat u doin
      - Browsing Slashdot.
      - oh

      Well, at some point those idiots disappeared from my IM client (WLM in my case) but, lo and behold, they're back in Facebook! Relatively cool people (or not really so much but who added you anyway) come up with that shit again! So, no. I don't want a Facebook IM on my cellphone. Just what I needed.... Getting annoyed on the road.
      I guess what I'm trying to say is those phones suck big time.

    3. Re:IM Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth noting that Facebook chat now uses exactly the same protocol - XMPP - as Google Talk does.

      You can use it natively with any XMPP client, such as Pidgin or whatever.

      The Facebook client software is now just a convenient way to access chat, and Facebook's market share ended up making their chat user base massive - and well organized with real names and all that. No more sexygurl786, now you can just find them as "Anna Smith".

  21. KinP hone by Sharp by aapold · · Score: 1

    Get it? (well they hope people get it)....

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  22. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by irreverant · · Score: 1

    Because, let's be honest, they do a much better job and social-networking functions then WinMo, what they don't do better is an all around Mobile business platform. I consider my new phone more of an ultra-ultra portable that happens to run a poor version of windows, it was interesting to find that some hackers had been able to load windows 7 on the device... promising.

    --
    Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
  23. Simple and Elegant by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

    "These phones have no downloadable apps, no games, not even a calendar. They're not meant to be expandable smart phones; instead very good messaging phones." Because no one does a simple and elegant device like Microsoft. This will be a roaring success... when compared to the UMPC.

  24. on the Ricky Martin scale of gayness... by p1ckk · · Score: 1

    I give it Ricky Martin

    1. Re:on the Ricky Martin scale of gayness... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      It's at least "Ryan Seacrest"

  25. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy kept looking up... waiting... for applause just to not get any :P
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocpOEhSmPyA
    I can't get excited about these and that is not because I'm too old (28) - Microsoft needs to fire their marketing department.

  26. Gosh by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    The phone war IS on, isn't it ?

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  27. Dr. Seuss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft, it seems, hired Dr. Seuss for their marketing department. It's hard to market devices like these, though.

    There's so many things
    That these phones do not do.
    Many, many things missing
    From Kin One and Kin Two.

    Someone should write a full hands-on review in this Dr. Seuss style.

    "Don't buy one if there's not enough apps for you
    No, they're not expandable, not Kin 1 or Kin 2."

  28. Makes the Zune Look Good by twmcneil · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well this is one way to stop people from saying "Zune is the suckiest thing ever".

    I am curious though, where are all the MS astro-turfers that usually hit this type of article so early and so hard? Is Mechanical Turk down?

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
    1. Re:Makes the Zune Look Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you drew at least one of them out. Note my sibling poster coming with the same old tired "you're just paranoid" schtick making sure to dress it up as sarcastically as possible. I swear they must have some kind of troll by numbers guidebook. The interesting thing is that it is a well known fact that Microsoft employs "online reputation management" firms to troll forums like Slashdot. Seriously, you guys don't have to try to hide it, everybody has read all about it. So just accept that the gig is up and carry on as usual.

  29. Very ugly by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I know I'm a geek and I'm by no way saying I can do better (I can't) but that just looks like something a nerd designed to look cool. It just doesn't work. A lot of PC software / hardware suffers from this and probably because designers like Macs so PC companies get left with geeky looking things. Imo, MS has never designed an OS that you enjoy looking at and aside from a few of their mice, none of their hardware ever looks that nice either.

    I really don't like that whole idea of the app screen being larger than the screen and you end up sliding things about to see stuff. Again, it looks like it was designed by someone who wanted to code that, not someone who coded something a designer created.

    They need to start paying some serious cash to steal designers away from Apple or something. They just don't get it, imo. The egg shaped one looks like a iPhone and Blackberry's retarded child. To be fair the rectangular one isn't too bad but nothing says cool about it.

    1. Re:Very ugly by McBeer · · Score: 1

      I really don't like that whole idea of the app screen being larger than the screen and you end up sliding things about to see stuff. They need to start paying some serious cash to steal designers away from Apple or something.

      You do realize that once you have a sufficient number of apps, the iPhone app panel works just like the Kin one right?

      They just don't get it, imo. The egg shaped one looks like a iPhone and Blackberry's retarded child. To be fair the rectangular one isn't too bad but nothing says cool about it.

      I've read quite a few articles on this thing. Interestingly, the Kin 1 (egg shaped one), is getting all the good press and the Kin 2 (candy bar) is being derided as just another blah blah smart phone form factor. While I too am more attracted to the Kin 2 form factor, I think MS really did their homework and the Kin 1 will prove to be more popular among the devices target audience. Somebody here doesn't get it, but it isn't MS.

      --
      Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    2. Re:Very ugly by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      It has to do better than previous Windows mobile phones (can't possibly do worse) but this is by far no threat to the iPhone or even Android, imo. We shall see but if I were a teen I'd more likely to think this is about as cool as my dad rapping.

    3. Re:Very ugly by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It has to do better than previous Windows mobile phones (can't possibly do worse) but this is by far no threat to the iPhone or even Android, imo.

      It's not intended to be. It's clearly not in the same market as the iPhone and Android are-- when Microsoft announces their Windows Mobile 7 phones, *then* you can compare them to iPhone and Android.

      The Kin here is more like a Sidekick, that's who they're competing with.

    4. Re:Very ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that once you have a sufficient number of apps, the iPhone app panel works just like the Kin one right?

      Actually, no. The iPhone works kind of like virtual desktops on a Linux PC. The Kin is more like how back in the day, some people set their really low res screens to panning mode where the monitor might be at 800x600 but the desktop itself is more like 1024x768 and you move your mouse around to see stuff that is out of view. The former is really slick and intuitive while the latter is just fucking annoying. Kind of like how clueless idiots such as yourself are annoying.

      I think MS really did their homework and the Kin 1 will prove to be more popular among the devices target audience.

      Blah blah blah. They said the same thing about the ZuneHD. You couldn't read a tech forum for weeks prior to that dog's release without having to wade through 3 metres of bullshit 'turf. It was going to kill the iPod Touch, fucking OLED bullshit that nobody really gave a shit about. Then look what happened. After the "grassroots" campaign, it fizzled out to nothing. The fucking Sansa outsells it.

      To sum it up, I'm sure MS gets it. They realize they suck. The only one that doesn't get it is you.

    5. Re:Very ugly by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      No matter what MS thinks they are comepting against those phones seeing how they're some of the most poular. Making a phone look like a G1 will make people compare it to a G1 and eveything competes against the iPhone.

      The thing is it looks like a windows 7 phone gui, it is actually quite close to windows phone 7 and from what I've read may be merged with it. MS fails at phones. They're not going to maintain to failing phone OS. I'd say in fact the whole lack of a app store is because it's basically running on an unfinished version of windows phone 7 if I had to guess.

      Kids like apps...this has no apps. It'll fail.

    6. Re:Very ugly by Tak_1 · · Score: 1

      @Blakey Rat "The Kin here is more like a Sidekick, that's who they're competing with."

      The Microsoft Kin, is competing against the Sidekick, the company Microsoft already bought, and drove into the ground?

      So what you are saying is Microsoft is building a phone to compete with themselves. At least they are finally competing with someone on even ground.

  30. Teens* + cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Kin One has a 5-Megapixel camera, while the Kin Two’s 8-Megapixel camera can shoot 720p HD video.

    Awesome! I can’t wait for the homemade porn.

    * For values of “teen” equaling 18 or 19, of course.

  31. Azure Data Grab by Yuioup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From what I could understand from the presentation, everything goes through Azure.

    Which means that all the posts you make go through Microsoft's data centers before they get posted on facebook/twitter/whatever.

    This is all just a scheme for Microsoft to gather user data and to monetize on it. A data-grab scheme, plain and simple.

    Tag this: Do Not Want

    Y

    1. Re:Azure Data Grab by cybrthng · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How does drivel like this get modded up? Microsoft has one of the best privacy policies of any of the cloud computing systems, probably better than the telco that most "Smart phone" users have for their contracts. IE, it isn't the azure/cloud platform you have to worry about.

    2. Re:Azure Data Grab by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't know, after reading about these phones, one of the most appealing features sounds like the ability to have all your data available online.

      One of the things I really want out of a phone is to not have my data stuck on my phone. Like I love the idea of Google Voice-- being able to have all my SMS and voicemail messages getting forwarded/stored in my email. I also like the idea that, when you take a picture with your camera, it automatically gets uploaded to a Flickr/Picasa sort of service.

      I want my data to be available to me. Yes, I also want privacy controls so I can decide whether I want to share it or keep it to myself. Ideally it would also be portable-- that I could choose whether I wanted to use Microsoft's servers, Google's servers, or Yahoo's servers. Still, I think the idea is good.

    3. Re:Azure Data Grab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And anyone who uses a pretentious sign-off at the bottom of each post should automatically be ignored anyway.

    4. Re:Azure Data Grab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they have a policy. I feel so assured now.

    5. Re:Azure Data Grab by killerdark · · Score: 1

      From what I could understand from the presentation, everything goes through Azure.

      Which means that all the posts you make go through Microsoft's data centers before they get posted on facebook/twitter/whatever.

      This is all just a scheme for Microsoft to gather user data and to monetize on it. A data-grab scheme, plain and simple.

      Tag this: Do Not Want

      Y

      It's not running on Azure. And a user data gathering plan? Mehhh.

      --
      A tadpole is a pollywog
    6. Re:Azure Data Grab by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's about time someone introduced this kind of functionality to the "multimedia phone" segment of the market - it's ridiculous how restricted and locked-down those phones are now, and the first time I saw how restricted a friend's phone was years ago I was so disgusted I was one of those "I just want something that makes phone calls" people until truly open smartphones became available (I have a Nexus One).

      Thing is, though, you still don't want one of these phones even though the online sync feature exists... because you can already do that with smartphones, with much greater flexibility about where your data is synced. There's *so much* more you can do with smartphones these days, it doesn't make sense to get something like this unless you really are a teenage girl who only wants/needs to send text messages and naked photos (this is obviously the target market).

    7. Re:Azure Data Grab by Onemadboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft Global Compliance Handbook from wikileaks - http://file.wikileaks.org/file/microsoft-spy.pdf Any agency can issue a subpoeana and Microsoft will comply for an account over 180days old. Under that a court order is required. Verizon has basically the same policies without any account age restriction http://www22.verizon.com/about/privacy/policy/#info

    8. Re:Azure Data Grab by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well I'm just responding to the complaint that this is a "data grab" by Microsoft by saying that I *like* the idea of all the data from my phone being automatically synced to online accounts. I even like the idea of all of my data being synced to the same online account.

      I'm thinking about getting a Nexus One, and one of the reasons is that it's supposed to have good support for Google Voice. I already use Gmail and Google Talk, so my IMs and emails essentially go to the same inbox (IMs don't actually go to the inbox, but they're managed in the same system). With Google Voice, I could have my SMS messages and voicemails go to that same inbox. That's *really* appealing in my mind. I hate having my communications spread all over different services on different devices.

      Does the Nexus One have an option so that whenever you take a picture, it's automatically synced to Picasa? That's another feature I'd like to see. I don't want to have to plug my camera into my computer, download the pictures through USB, sort the pictures, and then upload them to the Internet. I want it so my camera to sync pictures to the internet immediately by default. I'm sure someone here would think that's a dumb idea, but it's what I'd like.

  32. Great timing by Microsoft by hawks5999 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just 2 Weeks after Nielsen reports that Smartphones are Projected to Overtake Feature Phones Next Year, Microsoft goes big for the Feature Phone market.

    Who's running things over there?

    1. Re:Great timing by Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they stated they don't consider this a feature phone, but more like entry level smart phone. Plus, a year is a long time for a phone anyway. I seem to recall one company that releases a new phone every single year. Moreover, I'm confused as to how they account for that future acceleration in adoption in the future. It seems to have been relatively steady so far, but then the adoption rate apparently increases first quarter of next year which they don't explain why they think that. Plus, even then, going after a market that is still an enormous part of the phone market that everyone else seems to be ignoring sounds like an actually intelligent idea. Just under half the market will be neglected and Microsoft is swooping in to save them. I mean... I don't care how you decide to analyze your statement... it just is wrong in so many ways and on various levels.

  33. I want one - but only if... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

    ...someone finds a good way to reflash it with Meego (or Android).

  34. Monad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like "gonad."

    1. Re:Monad... by dwiget001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Monad" -- a condition where you have a single (instead of paired) gonad, due to birth defect, accident, etc.

    2. Re:Monad... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You guys should seriously look up Haskell and its monadic IO system, for a major enlightenment in terms of your programming skills.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  35. At least they're innovating at some level by sootman · · Score: 1

    It's only a small thing (no pun intended) but this form factor (1, 2) is, if nothing else, pretty different from everything else we've seen so far. I doubt it'll be enough to save the line, but at least someone, somewhere is trying new stuff.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:At least they're innovating at some level by tekrat · · Score: 1

      I could accept the small one if it was also... say... a Tamogatchi. If you could hang the phone on a necklace, it's screen was on all the time, and it could show your mood. Or display your horoscope. Or if it could do *anything*. But it doesn't seem to be for anything at all. It's too small to use for the web realistically, and while I'm sure kids can twitter with it, there are better phones in that mindspace.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  36. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Because, let's be honest, they do a much better job and social-networking functions then WinMo, what they don't do better is an all around Mobile business platform.

    Do you mean the fact that WinMo development tools are more enterprise-centric (SQL sync, datasets, drag & drop RAD UI designer, all that stuff)?

    Because, feature-wise at least, I don't see why an Android phone couldn't be use in the same fashion.

  37. So much money, so much power... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    And Microsoft still can't make a decent product if their lives depended upon it. I fail to understand how a company that always hires "the best and the brightest" can make such lousy decisions. Seriously, what middle manager or marketing suit looked at this turd and said "killer! -- this is hot!"

    Unless this phone is going to be DIRT CHEAP (as in free with a new contract), it's doomed to fail. Kids do not want "low end", they want what they see the celebrities using on MTV. And Rihanna isn't going to be using one of these, she's going to use an iPhone or Blackberry.

    How MS continues to strive for mediocrity (and even fails at that) I have to wonder. You would think with all the talent, money and power they control that someone there would be able to convince them they need to make a GREAT product, not a below average product.

    Is Steve Jobs really that much of a magician that Apple can come out with really innovative products and market them successfully, or is just that the rest of corporate America has their heads so far up their own asses they couldn't see a good product if you beat them senseless with it?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:So much money, so much power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have strong opinions on Microsoft. Sure.

      But don't pretend you have any idea what young people value (after all, you're too old to be Cool).

  38. Slashdot or Gizmodo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... so many stories today are about vendor product releases. I fail to see how this fits the raison d'etre for Slashdot. You're watering down the content in an attempt to rival Gizmodo and Engadget and it's starting to become annoying. A watered down Slashdot is becoming increasingly less worthy of my time.

  39. are these... by zarzu · · Score: 1

    ... the new pringles? they look classy.

  40. A Blackberry for young people? by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's sort of like a Blackberry for young people. Or the Hasbro/Tiger Clueless Organizer, version 2.0.

    It's about time for the toy companies to move into the phone space.

    1. Re:A Blackberry for young people? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Wow. Was that thing real? Tell me somebody went to all that trouble to make a joke. That couldn't have been a real product. No way.

      Please?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:A Blackberry for young people? by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem that far-fetched... it's basically the teenage girl version of The Wizard from Seinfeld. I remember those things being quite the fad back in the early-mid 90's... I think I may have even been given a cheap one (not a Clueless one) after the fad ended and Chinese copies flooded the market. I never quite saw the purpose, but then, in the mid nineties I was a young nerdy kid with no friends or appointments to keep track of :)

  41. Very odd event and phones by edelbrp · · Score: 1

    I followed the event online, it was very strange (check out that ugly ass bus!) The presentation right down to the clothes was odd. The phones are pretty ugly (imho) and the packaging looks like cheap body spray would be inside.

    The interview was also interesting. My favorite quote:

    Bach: From a marketplace standpoint, there's certainly a video and music marketplace. There isn't an app marketplace...

    In other words, they don't have the money or effort to create a competitive app store, but it's a hell of a lot easier to sell the existing catalog of video and music.

    Keep in mind this was only 2 year project (can't find the reference to that again, though...) and might have had some financial backing from the big social sites which are featured on the phones (Twitter, Facebook, and MySpace). They are basically simple, cheap phones for teenagers (they mention giving them to a 13 and 17 year girls to use).

    1. Re:Very odd event and phones by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Microsoft already has an app store for windows mobile. This isn't the win phone 7 / iphone / android / blackberry market.

      In other words, Microsoft is entering into the "feature phone / messaging phone / multimedia phone" market. Prior to this, they've only been making a smart phone OS.

  42. The Peter Principle by copponex · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle ...in a hierarchy, members are promoted so long as they work competently. Sooner or later they are promoted to a position at which they are no longer competent (their "level of incompetence"), and there they remain, being unable to earn further promotions. This principle can be modeled and has theoretical validity. Peter's Corollary states that "in time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out his duties" and adds that "work is accomplished by those employees who have not yet reached their level of incompetence".

    In the corporate world especially, upper level politics and kickbacks and alliances always end up chucking creativity out the door, grinding it into the pavement, and writing off as an R&D expense as it's scooped into the dust bin.

    Google avoids this by letting employees work on their own pet projects that get picked up for major development as they gain popularity in their internal culture, which seems to be quite good at picking winners. Apple has so far escaped this only because it's run like North Korea. There's one maniacal prick and marketing genius at the top of the food chain, and everyone else is meaningless.

    1. Re:The Peter Principle by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I find your ideas fascinating and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  43. Cloudy with a chance of meatheads. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Onboard storage, however, is not the point, according to Microsoft executives. In fact, both phones serve as a portal to the cloud, storing photos, videos and other data on the network, rather than on the phone. Neither phone, for example, has an SD card slot, executives said.

    "Thousands of customers walk into our stores every month and ask us, how do I get photos off this phone?" said John Harrobin, Verizon's vice president of digital media.

    So now they'll ask: "How do I get photos off 'the cloud'." Yes, much better.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  44. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by irreverant · · Score: 1

    Ok, I want to be clear about what i'm saying. Your right, there's no reason why an android phone couldn't be used for the same reason's, however, i believe that because of the way the phone has been marketed, i don't believe that the end user's will push for the same features and since there isn't a demand for the features on the phone, they won't be created which limits the phones capabilities for enterprise-centric functionality. Unlike windows phones which are already marketed for this function. In other words, I'm not buying an f150 to perform like a gt 40 (this just an analogy), of course i can outfit the f150 to produce the same performance however, not many people would want that type of performance out of a truck (i'm talking about the general public).

    --
    Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
  45. Palm Pre Plus/Pixi Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or get a Palm Pre Plus or Pixi Plus which VZW has been selling on the cheap with free mobile hotspot service .... http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2010/04/01/verizon-wireless-puts-the-palm-pre-plus-and-pixi-plus-on-a-fire-sale/

  46. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first phone I've seen with a smiley emoticon key

  47. So this doesn't run Flash either by joeflies · · Score: 1

    so where's the corporate backlash from Adobe threatening lawsuits to get on Microsoft devices?

    1. Re:So this doesn't run Flash either by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      I would like a pad like device with web, webcam and flash?
      Linux would be good.
      Why are all the new MS and non MS handheld devices flash free?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  48. Oh for... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    According to a Microsoft official the phones are named Kin because they 'knit together...

    Knit together, huh? C'mere you!

    (sounds of a Microsoft offical being violent slapped about)

    OK, what does it mean again?

    kindred spirits.'

    Oh dear, oh dear.

    (more sounds of a Microsoft offical being violent slapped about)

    Are you trying to amuse me? Does "kin" seem funny to you?

    It says "you turn me on" inside the package

    (blank stare)

    OK. Rocko! Slab! Take this guy outside and give him the extended lesson.

  49. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Different Android phones - there's more than one! - are marketed differently. E.g. if you look at Nexus One, it's all about the geeky crowd (which is why I got one).

  50. These will go far, have a cigar. by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And by the way, which one is Pink?

    --- squirted from my Zune.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:These will go far, have a cigar. by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      You should buy both. If One breaks, you still have Two. Or if two break, you still have one.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  51. Dr. Seuss FTW by dvs0826 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one here who gets the Cat in the Hat reference?

  52. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by irreverant · · Score: 1

    I heard about the nexus one but never really researched it, how is it marketed to the geeky crowd?

    --
    Of all the things I've lost; I miss my mind the most. - Mark Twain
  53. So, how DO you get photos off the phone? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Onboard storage, however, is not the point, according to Microsoft executives. In fact, both phones serve as a portal to the cloud, storing photos, videos and other data on the network, rather than on the phone. Neither phone, for example, has an SD card slot, executives said. 'Thousands of customers walk into our stores every month and ask us, how do I get photos off this phone?' said John Harrobin, Verizon's vice president of digital media.'"

    Oooh, "portal to the cloud." Well, then, that answers all criticism.

    The younger generation just totally gets putting their pictures in the cloud. Verizon will transmit and store them for free. The cloud storage will be accessible to, compatible with, and interoperable with with their friends' iPhones. The risque pictures they upload will be secure and private. The concept of storing them in an SD card is way too technical for the target market to comprehend. Not.

    1. Re:So, how DO you get photos off the phone? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yay, more unedited crap posted to the Internet. Photos are one thing, but imagine the sheer wasted resources posting 720p video to YouTube straight and raw from millions of phones.

    2. Re:So, how DO you get photos off the phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on the San Francisco media rollout event for this phone, so I got to see the "presentation" and see the phone in action. While I find the thing to be an abhorrent privacy nightmare, I think it will probable do quite well in its intended demographic market.

      They did market research focus groups on 50,000 "young adults" and this phone is a direct result of their findings. They are marketing this to a demographic they call the "social generation". These are the teens and young adults who have grown up putting their whole lives on the web. They have to be in constant contact with their friends to validate their existence. They have little concern for privacy. They just haven't had enough experience in the world yet to understand the implications of giving all your data to corporations and governments.

      The really horrifying thing to me:

      It backs all your data up automatically. You can then access your "Kin Account" from any browser. All of your pictures are timestamped and geo-located. All your calls and text messages are logged and presented on a timeline along with your pictures and video.

      They are marketing this as a kind of digital diary. Once someone hacks your account it becomes the ultimate privacy invasion. I don't think the target demographic cares. Time and the market will tell.

  54. 'Kin hell by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Don't they see the obvious joke you can make with the name?

    Microsoft have some of the most talentless branding and marketing people in the world.

    They call their OS Windows (it has windows) and their Office suite Office.

    I'm amazed this phone isn't called Microsoft Child Phone or something.

  55. almost smartphones but with a possibly killer app by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    They look like almost-but-not-quite smart phones that are already on the market today

    Indeed, they do look like today's features phones. However, look closer and you'll see that their friends and "internet friends" social hub could be a killer app. People seem to think condensing all the social networks into one spot is the bee's knees.

    Then throw in the "Apple pretty" interface thanks to the nVidia Tegra chip, and you've got a feature phone ahead of the curve.

  56. Microsoft releases world's dumbest smartphone by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has unveiled its new Zune One and Zune Two mobile phones, target-marketed at unusually stupid social-networking enthusiasts in their late teens and early twenties with a higher income than their IQ.

    Team leader Roz Ho said the company had tried to create a Microsoft gadget that people actually wanted to have, like the XBox 360, but that actually worked properly.

    "Get your Friendster and your MySpace!" said Ms Ho. "We studied consumer habits and built the perfect phone for the, uh, 'social generation,'" she air-quoted, "to make it 'fab' and 'bling' — I mean, of course, 'Bing!' — for people too stupid to work an iPhone to share their lives moment to moment."

    The handset is of simple design for simple people. The keyboard automatically switches caps lock on at random and interjects common "chat" acronyms like "LOL" and "OMG" and "RTFM" should too many words in a row be spelt correctly. A breathalyzer automatically switches on the video camera in the event of excessive alcohol consumption. As well as the usual daily crashes, the Blue Screen of Death can be invoked by the user so as to have a suitable excuse not to answer a text. Later revisions of the phone may include making voice calls.

    "We are excited to be the exclusive carrier for this exciting new Microsoft phone in the exciting US," said John Harrobin, Senior Vice President of Paperclip Filing and Vacuous Press Release Quotes at Verizon Wireless. "Because we fucking hate you people. We really do."

    Roz Ho was previously leader of the Microsoft team that lost all the data on everyone's T-Mobile Sidekick phones last year when she told the systems team not to bother with backups.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Microsoft releases world's dumbest smartphone by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Note: I got the last line from RoughlyDrafted, which slurps heartily at the anus of Steve Jobs but is usually good with actual facts (even if the opinions are made of speculation). But I am told by someone I know who I was surprised to learn was one of those who had to clean up the mess that she was a few managerial levels up from the Sidekick mess and wasn't the person (if any) who authorised being cavalier with backups.

      OTOH, facts, comedy, cruelty. Ballmer probably Fucking Killed Sidekick personally.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:Microsoft releases world's dumbest smartphone by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Back to the warm embrace of an extended MS product range.
      http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/oct09/10-15sidekick.mspx
      Better keep your data backed up or the Sidekick techs will extinguish it.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  57. Re:Microsoft - will surface save their dieing mobi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I heard about the nexus one but never really researched it, how is it marketed to the geeky crowd?

    For starters, it's not sold through retail channels.

    Its look is not as "bling" (today this seems to mean glossy) as iPhone is. It's gray / dark gray, with rubberized plastic back for no-slip holding. For the most part, the design is function-over-form, though I do find it looking more slick than iPhone (but then again I am a geek...).

    In terms of actual features, it allows you to install third-party applications directly from .apk files (circumventing Market). Furthermore, its boot loader does not validate the system, so you can replace it with customized (e.g. rooted) modification with no hassle.

  58. They come in CANS!? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    They come in CANS!? Welcome to 1985, Microsoft! I'm really surprised they have a department that is farther behind than software development...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  59. Microsoft's Crack Design Team at work again by awpoopy · · Score: 1

    You see, the new phones just announced as Kin One and Kin Two by Microsoft were a product of Microsoft's Crack Design Team.
    That is, they gave a group of people meth and a crayon. (They only got a red, green or blue one.)

    --
    I say things which affects my Karma negatively. (and I don't care) For instance; All religion is false.
  60. A Serious Contender by rueger · · Score: 1

    Wow, no doubt in mind that the Kin and the Pre are facing a real battle for market share!

  61. Name suggestion: "Crash" and "Burn" by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    I love the package. It makes me want a hot cocoa.

    It seems like MS cannot design or market anything that they weren't selling a LOT of 15 years ago. Anything they do that's new (or that wasn't selling well back then) comes off looking like MS is grossly out of touch with... well, everybody.

  62. Um, LOL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seemed appropriate.

  63. The Fail Heard 'Round the World by Duggeek · · Score: 1

    I hope this device will be as successful as the zune.

    It's running zunes os after-all.

    If they keep that "classic Xbox green/black" color theme, then I'm sure they will. They will indeed.

    --
    This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  64. Meanwhile, the Silverlight team plots revenge by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the KinMeisters used Flash to market the thing.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  65. Re:8GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Not even the Zune plays MP3s. They must be converted to DRM'd WMA files first.

  66. copy off Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give me a break - the Two looks just like the Palm Pre with a horizontal keyboard. How is it they don't get sued for that!

  67. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's designed to make geeks like Microsoft through questionable pron. They are learning.

  68. So they are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defective by design.

    Seriously. Those doesn't seem to be cheap underpowered devices. Are just crippled Win Phone 7 devices.

  69. It was never a prophecy by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    Not this myth yet again - it wasn't a prophecy, it was a comment. Just because something is popular, doesn't make it non-lame (is no one allowed to criticise Windows and IE?)

    As for the phones - does it really not support any apps, even if via Java (even bog standard feature phones have had apps since at least 2005)? How much does it cost anyway - is it fair to compare this to expensive Iphones, or to lower end phones?

    Not that running apps should be the be all and end all of phones. The Iphone has plenty of missing features such as Flash/Java, multitasking, ability to run any 3rd party app, and from the point of view of my 5800, it looks rather like a locked down feature phone too. Let's face it - if it was the Iphone that did other things, but not apps, you'd be all over yourselves claiming how revolutionary the Iphone was, but that apps were something you didn't need ("It does everything I want it to do already" etc).

  70. Microsoft to use Apple/IBM OS??? by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    Oh, wrong pink!

  71. Way too similar to the Pre by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The Palm Pre is pretty cheap, and has many of these features.

    Speaking of which, the Kin One looks suspiciously similar in design to the Pre :
    - Rounded smooth shape
    - Small vertically sliding keyboard, with tiny gummy keys
    - No SD card data goes in and out only through the cloud

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]