Slashdot Mirror


Steak-Scented Billboard Entices Drivers

In addition to car exhaust and road grime, travelers along Highway 150 in North Carolina can now enjoy the smell of a barbecue thanks to a new billboard. The work of ScentAir, which provides custom scents for businesses, the advertisement for a local grocer emits the smell of charcoal and black pepper over the highway. "Marketing director Murray Dameron said the beef scent was emitted by a high-powered fan at the bottom of the billboard that blows air over cartridges loaded with BBQ fragrance oil. 'It smells like grilled meat with a nice pepper rub on it,' he explained."

282 comments

  1. BBQ? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Screw that! I want BACON!!!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:BBQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why are most Americans fat, again?

    2. Re:BBQ? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Probably not bacon, otherwise Canadians would be far worse.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:BBQ? by Golddess · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought Canadian bacon was leaner?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    4. Re:BBQ? by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

      There may be a lower fat content per unit of meat, but here's where you are a little shortsighted (no offense!!): the Canadians have stockpiles of bacon. Warehouses, supply depots, and bazaars. This is why the Canadians have such a strong economy now. They finally found their place in the world. Bacon.

    5. Re:BBQ? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Canadian bacon is ham. >_>

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    6. Re:BBQ? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are most Americans fat, again?

      I don't know about most Americans, but this American is fat because I sit at this computer all day, stuff my face with hot pockets and cheesy poofs, and the only thing close to 'exercise' I get is using the remote control or my smartphone. That's just my assumptions anyway, 'cuz I'm not a doctor.

    7. Re:BBQ? by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      This really shouldnt be modded troll . . . lets be honest guys . . . .

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    8. Re:BBQ? by digitig · · Score: 1

      But I'm a vegetarian, you insensitive clo ... oh, wait: "the smell of charcoal and black pepper". That's ok, then. Says something about their BBQ skills, doesn't it?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    9. Re:BBQ? by M8e · · Score: 1

      Turkey bacon is also lean, and i have never seen a fat turk.(have seen fat canadians)

    10. Re:BBQ? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Sugar and starches, combined with insufficient exercises.

    11. Re:BBQ? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As much as I love bacon, the smell of good, slowly smoked BBQ beats it every time. There's nothing like stopping at a shack on the side of some southern highway on a cool 90F afternoon in early summer for some ribs that have been smoked all day long. A glass of lemonade to drench the heat from the dry rub and a wedge of corn bread, and you have the finest meal imaginable.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:BBQ? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Turkey bacon is also lean, and i have never seen a fat turk.(have seen fat canadians)

      It also has the distinction of tasting lousy, along with the texture of thin leather, thus reducing calorie intake even more... Like fake mayo or tofu turkey, just say no. If you don't want to eat something because of calories or philosophical objections, don't eat it. Making up phony versions of real, tasty food is just sad...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    13. Re:BBQ? by kryliss · · Score: 1

      Screw that! I want BACON!!!

      With or without wings?

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    14. Re:BBQ? by treeves · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, were you an extra in Wall-E?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:BBQ? by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      Canadian bacon is ham. >_>

      Not exactly... You are thinking of US made "Canadian style bacon".. -_-;


      Up here it's a lean cut from the loin, sweet pickle cured, rolled in peameal (hence the alt name: peameal bacon) or more often nowadays, corn meal. It it NOT smoked.

    16. Re:BBQ? by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      But When you soak everything in maple syrup it more then makes up for that.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    17. Re:BBQ? by Curate · · Score: 1
      Turkey bacon is also lean, and i have never seen a fat turk.(have seen fat canadians)

      You may not have seen a fat turk, but have you seen a Big Turk? It's something enjoyed by us fat Canadians. :) They're actually pretty low in fat, so they're probably not what made us fat.

    18. Re:BBQ? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Bacon is vegetarian food - all spices are herbs, herbs are vegetarian food. Bacon is an excellent way to spice up your food, logically therefore bacon is vegetarian.

    19. Re:BBQ? by Dissident · · Score: 1

      I wonder what an ad for a strip club would smell like?

    20. Re:BBQ? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Personally, I treat turkey bacon like I do turkey burgers or chicken burgers; just an alternative way of preparing an animal that I already love to eat.

      Continuing off on the tangent though, while having a moral objection to eating meat while eating fake meat does seem kinda silly, what's wrong with avoiding a particular food for health reasons but still wanting to experience that food's taste?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    21. Re:BBQ? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      For $50, I'll stand on the billboard and throw bacon bits at your car as you drive past lol

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    22. Re:BBQ? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Continuing off on the tangent though, while having a moral objection to eating meat while eating fake meat does seem kinda silly, what's wrong with avoiding a particular food for health reasons but still wanting to experience that food's taste?

      I have known people that will eat birds and fish but nothing on four legs.
      I didn't waste my time trying to understand it or argue...
      If the fake stuff was even CLOSE, I'd be there. But it's not. I have to avoid bacon because of gout. Bacon is a trigger food for me, along with chicken breast. I know, it sounds wrong but I can eat beef all day, two chicken breasts and I'm on crutches, four slices of bacon, same thing. So I really gave the fake bacon a shot, went through a whole package and cussed every slice. I have had OK turkey sausage, I suspect that's because you can make sausage out of almost any ground meat. Turkey pepperoni can be OK if you don't get it too hot. But fake bacon, mayo, cheese, etc. just don't work... if you really liked the originals.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    23. Re:BBQ? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about America. But over here (Norway) the public health authorities report that the average calorie-consumption has infact NOT gone up the last 50 years. What has changed is that while 50 years ago 80% of the population had a job where they spent the majority of time being physically active, today 75% have a job where the majority of time is spent sitting.

      The obesity-epidemic ain't as bad as in USA, but Norwegians too, are on the average significantly heavier than we where a generation or two ago.

    24. Re:BBQ? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm soooo using this on my girlfriend on Saturday. Do you have a similar idea for eggs? :P

  2. They alread do that in CA... by rabblerabblerabble · · Score: 1

    ...with the MMJ dispensaries.

    1. Re:They alread do that in CA... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Are there that many people in California that need to cable a console to a VAX?

    2. Re:They alread do that in CA... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      They make the highway smell like DEC-style modular connectors?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:They alread do that in CA... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They had a sweet setup. Take an MMJ cable, and stick a male DB25-MMJ adapters on one end, and a female DB25-MMJ adapter on the other, and you had a straight through cable. It would connect DCE equipment to DTE equipment. Stick two male DB25-MMJ adapters on the cable, and you had a null modem cable for connecting DCEs. Stick two female DB25-MMJ adapters on the cable and you had a null modem cable for connecting two DTEs. Pretty much everything DEC just worked.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:They alread do that in CA... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      I still have an MMJ crimper and a couple of unused ends somewhere at home. Too bad it died, 'cause now we're stuck with fifty different ways to pin out an RJ45.

  3. Push button, receive bacon by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw that! I want BACON!!!

    For that, all you need is to go into a gas station and use the restroom. Push button, receive bacon.

    1. Re:Push button, receive bacon by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Are you a gas station shill or something?

      I went into our local gas station's bathroom, and did just that. I pushed the button and waited for so long that my hands were all dry, and still no bacon. That's false advertisement.

  4. CARCINOGENIC AIR POLLUTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    do not want, sue sue sue

    1. Re:CARCINOGENIC AIR POLLUTION by Israfels · · Score: 1
      It's scented oil. They're not actually blasting you with charcoal smoke.

      Just think of the other applications:
      • Flowers scents for FTD and Pro Flowers, etc.
      • Fresh pine scents for wood furniture.
      • Apple pie scent for Marie Calendars.
      • Vomit scent for a negative campaign ad.
      • The smell of money, etc... Profits.
    2. Re:CARCINOGENIC AIR POLLUTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's scented oil. They're not actually blasting you with charcoal smoke.

      Scented oil, also known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic.

      Neither perfume nor scented oils are tested for health effects, and some of them contain known carcinogens. To trust some advertisers that they're not poisoning you is stupid.

  5. At first I wondered if it was real... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then I realized that they had not, in fact, made a misteak.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then I realized that they had not, in fact, made a misteak.

      ARGH I hate you for using that stupid pun. I hope the next time you pull out into an intersection you get T-Boned!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's rare to find a good pun like that.

    3. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ARGH I hate you for using that stupid pun.

      Really? I thought it was remarkably well done.

    4. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 1, Troll

      That was an A1 pun.

    5. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, somebody with mod points is on a [t]roll today! All these meat puns have made me smile today.

    6. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by dancingmilk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seeing a thread with this many good puns in it is pretty rare.

    7. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Wanado · · Score: 0

      parent is not a Troll! steak....T-Boned....get it? swoosh!

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    8. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't get why yours is marked funny and mine is marked Troll. I guess I should simmer down.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by MisterZimbu · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Don't have a cow.

    10. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by nottheusualsuspect · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wit such as yours is rare dammit someone beat me to it... if I had posted that I'd have been flame-broiled

    11. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by baxnick · · Score: 1

      But I thought, “Nah, forget it. Yo, holmes to Bel-Air!”

    12. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know! Can you believe someone rolled through and modded us all trolls? What's his beef?

    13. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      true facts, if you browse at +3 or 4, you can really trim the fat out.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    14. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by heruvian · · Score: 1

      All these puns about steak rub
      me the wrong way

    15. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to drive a steak through this thread's heart.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    16. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by ibmjones · · Score: 1

      There is definitely not enough meat in this thread.

    17. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by mortonda · · Score: 1

      I think you got to the meat of the discussion there...

    18. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      true facts, if you browse at +3 or 4, you can really trim the fat out.

      Oh please, any true steak connoisseur knows that the fat is what makes the steak.

    19. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please be serious, this is a meaty subject.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    20. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by tunapez · · Score: 1

      Good rib, aye? No wot I mean?

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    21. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Dogbertius · · Score: 1

      ARGH I hate you for using that stupid pun.

      Really? I thought it was remarkably well done.

      It would seem the seasoned vets here are kicking off the day.

    22. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Lexicon · · Score: 1

      What a prime ribbing.

    23. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Driving a steak through somethings heart would take some mighty doings, or a freezer...

    24. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed and I would like to meat all of the authors.

    25. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Seriously, right?! Fat chance such grisly tactics by some obvious PETA mignon could stem the a-salt of puns. What a jerky!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    26. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Niddix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh they just had a cow since they couldn't come up with one of their own.

    27. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have put this on the Salisbury Highway near Statesville, NC.

    28. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Can we please change the subject back to tech? Anyone been to fries, lately?

    29. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      Don't have a cow, man!

      --
      This space for rent
    30. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      This thread was definitely a cut above, though it could strike a nerve with moderators.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    31. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I looked through the whole exchange and I can't find it... where's the beef?

    32. Re:At first I wondered if it was real... by Metabolife · · Score: 1

      You really need to cut it out guys.

  6. A Scentsor? by Izabael_DaJinn · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I always wondered why there can't be an electronic way to generate smells, such as how a speaker produces sounds. Is it theoretically possible to ever create a machine or device that can create a variety of scents based on some sort of scent-spectrum? Or are "cartridges loaded with BBQ fragrance oil" the best we'll ever do? (This is one of those questions I have always wondered but been afraid to ask!)

    iza

    --
    Careful What You Wish For....
    1. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound is a compression wave where smells are chemicals.

    2. Re:A Scentsor? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Interesting

      AFAIK, the easy part is generating the smell. The difficult part is how to move from one smell to another. Once the speakers stop, the sounds waves stop propogating almost immediately. But a smell will still be lingering. I believe they tried this with some movie houses back in the 50's (billed as Smell-O-Vision probably:-) and they just couldn't get one smell out of the theatre in time for the next one.

      I'm also pretty sure I don't want to think about how some web sites would actually use such technology for generating a profit.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    3. Re:A Scentsor? by john83 · · Score: 1

      Because you'd need a way to synthesise arbitrary chemicals.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    4. Re:A Scentsor? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No more so than a printer has to synthesise arbitrary coloured dyes.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:A Scentsor? by Deag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some theme park rides have them. There is one in Disney world that has scents as well as 3d and water splashing and stuff.

    6. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Printer -> 4 colors (3 primaries plus black)

      Smell-o-whatever -> several hundred different aroma compounds

      That's your problem. There is, as far as anybody's been able to demonstrate, such a thing as a primary odor. You have somewhere in the region of 1000 different odor receptors in your nose but they are mostly non-specific and have overlapping sensitivities that make it next to impossible to reproduce all possible aromas from a small subset of chemicals. Couple that with the fact that aroma chemicals are, by necessity, volatile (otherwise you couldn't smell them) and you have a real problem with shelf-life too. If you had an olfactometer with a few hundred chemicals for producing smells, you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

    7. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound is basically a wave through a medium (air), whereas a scent is a specific molecule in air that your nose senses. There is no easy way to 'create' that molecule. So.. you need the scent cartridges to introduce those scent molecules into air.

    8. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can't electronically reproduce a smell in a way analogous to a speaker. Olfaction is a chemical sense (along with taste) and requires chemicals to be present in order to be smelt. In other words, any device for producing aromas has to have a reservoir of aroma chemicals already present, in the same way a printer must have a reservoir of ink. Unfortunately, unlike a printer where you can produce a good range of colors from 3 primary colored inks, the same doesn't happen with smell. There is no such thing (as far as anybody has been able to identify) as a primary smell. You can't reproduce the smell of benzaldehyde by mixing other chemicals in any simple straightforward way.

      That's not to say you can produce a range of aromas by mixing chemicals, of course you can, it's what perfumers and flavorist do all day; but the palette of chemicals they use for, say, producing steak aromas is both large and quite different than the palette they'd use to produce, say, strawberry aromas. If you wanted a palette that could reasonably cover the entire range of aromas you might smell in everyday life (from steak and strawberries to gasoline and dog shit) it would easily run into several hundred chemicals.

    9. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Producing a single smell (like steak) or a small number of smells is easy. Generating a system that would be flexible enough to cover a wide range of the "aroma space" is much more difficult. That aside, your point about lingering is also very true. It's pretty hard to suck the aroma back out of a space and there are problems with contamination as well (example, I was grilling over the weekend and the clothes I wore that day still smell like smoke).

    10. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those can't produce arbitrary smells, they're preprogrammed and loaded with the appropriate chemicals to emit the specific smells needed for that particular ride.

    11. Re:A Scentsor? by kno3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      I can't see that that would be a problem. Printer ink is volatile, but that has a reasonable shelf life. You just keep it in a closed container until it is actually needed. In fact, if you didn't do that then your "olfactometer" (surely it would be more a olfactoducer) would constantly be producing the biggest concoction of scents it could muster.

    12. Re:A Scentsor? by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing will be far easier once everyone has the proper brain implants. Then they could just program the right smell into your brain, no chemicals and no mess!

      I sure as hell hope we never get to that day, though. :(

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    13. Re:A Scentsor? by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to just implant themselves directly in your bank account? Then they wouldn't even have to make the steaks, and we wouldn't get fat. Or rich, for that matter.

    14. Re:A Scentsor? by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      The implants have other uses... :p

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    15. Re:A Scentsor? by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Generating a system that would be flexible enough to cover a wide range of the "aroma space" is much more difficult."

      Not at all. The big mall we have here in town manages numerous smells during all business hours. The clothing shops have leather scents wafting from them, the jewelry stores have rose scents and such, etc, etc. Every single store has SOME scent being pushed out the front door into the open areas of the mall. They simply have some periodic sprayer releasing canned scents into a fan duct above the doors. They've been doing it for at least the six years I've lived here.

      It is also the reason I don't do ANY business there anymore.

      I have a headache within 15 minutes of walking in the door of the mall. The problem is that they are not using actual components for smells, such as leather to produce the smell of leather, but rather some chemical composition that merely smells like leather. All of the smells are artificial and there is no regulation of the chemicals they are exposing all of the customers to. The companies that manufacture the scents are the only ones determining what is used and what isn't. Considering they do it for profit, I do not assume they are using known SAFE chemicals but rather chemicals that simply smell like what the customers want. I actually tried to find out what chemicals they use. The mall managers denied they used them at all, yet when I pointed out the clothing shop that smelled like leather but didn't sell a scrap of actual leather, I was told that the smells of the mall "mingle" and that it was probably from a different store.

    16. Re:A Scentsor? by bcmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That works because we have only have three types of receptor for colour vision (plus rods for greyscale night-vision). Colours are distinguished by how much they stimulate each receptor, and things that stimulate them in the same proportions are seen to be the same colour, even if the light is not composed of the same frequencies. Thus, you can approximately simulate any combination of frequencies at various intensities by combining, at appropriate intensities, just three frequencies that each stimulate one receptor strongly while having little effect on the other two.

      Olafaction is rather less well understood, but almost certainly involves a much greater number of receptors.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    17. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...for generating a profit.

      anti-capitalist liberal alert!

    18. Re:A Scentsor? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Theoretically I suppose it's possible, but it's highly unlikely. Sound is produced by pressure waves. Those are easy to create by moving a speaker cone. Scents are actual particles floating through the air. Sure, it's theoretically possible to create particles I guess (E=mc^2), but I think that would be far worse than steak scented cartridges.

    19. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      The solvent in printer ink is volatile, not the ink itself. However, I didn't say it would be an impossible problem, but it is non-trivial. Especially when you consider that you are dealing with a wide range of chemicals with different material compatibilities, it is unlikely that you could design a single cartridge that could hold all of them. For example, terpenes can be very aggressive on some plastics.

    20. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1
    21. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. They are using the SAME aroma (different for different stores) all the time. It's basically a big can of air-freshener. They are not generating arbitrary aromas on-demand or on-the-fly. This would be similar to having them pipe the same song out their speakers all the time because their stereo is only capable of producing Justin Bieder.

      As for your nonsense about chemicals, what do you think are the "actual components for smells"? Here's a hint, they are chemicals. Everything you smell is a chemical. In the case of leather I'd even argue you're better of with a reproduced leather smell that the real thing. Do you have any idea of the shit they use for tanning?

    22. Re:A Scentsor? by mea37 · · Score: 1

      A speaker or a display work by putting into your environment something that your ears or eyes (respectively) will respond to. This is relatively easy because what your eyes and ears respond to are relatively simple energy waves. I don't think it's likely that an analogous approach will ever be practical for smell because the real-world thing your nose reacts to is understood to be much more complex.

      However, another approach might work - bypass the nose and stimulate nerves directly to make the brain "think" it smells what you want it to smell.

    23. Re:A Scentsor? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "As for your nonsense about chemicals, what do you think are the "actual components for smells"? Here's a hint, they are chemicals. Everything you smell is a chemical. In the case of leather I'd even argue you're better of with a reproduced leather smell that the real thing. Do you have any idea of the shit they use for tanning?"

      And you miss my point.

      Neither you, nor I, have any idea what they actually use in these scents. They could be using anything, and the simple fact that I can smell it means I am being exposed to something I do not want to be exposed to--all in the name of advertising.

      Fuck that.

      Now, you might say something along the lines of "Then don't fucking shop there", and you would be quite right in saying so, because that was exactly my reaction. I don't go to the mall anymore.

      As far as tanning leather goes, I lived a block away from a tannery in Santa Cruz, CA. that operated 7 days a week and never once did I experience headaches because of it.

      I also didn't state it was one system piping out multiple smells. Each store selects their own scents that emanate from the store entrances--I assume to lead the customers to the store with specific smells. They are probably just as you say. A dispenser located near the entrance loaded up with a can of scent spray. That doesn't change the end result--a cloud of unknown chemicals wafting around the place.

    24. Re:A Scentsor? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn’t need to arbitrarily duplicate any smell. Just like a printer can’t actually arbitrarily duplicate any colour... it’s restricted to the CMY colorspace, which is pretty damn close to “any” colour but not quite.

      A smell synthesizer could actually be even more limited... you might have to buy a specific “flowers” cartridge that contains half-a-dozen or so chemicals that can make a variety of flowery-smelling combinations, for instance.

      Even so, it might be possible to make a reasonable impression of a wide variety of smells using a relatively small number of compounds... the question is, how well could you duplicate an odor and how few compounds could you limit the device to in order to still get a decent variety of smells it can duplicate?

      The main advantage to having a limited variety is that you would only be using the ones that you need and you wouldn’t have dozens (or hundreds) of compounds that never got used but took up extra space. That would be like printing everything in blue and running out of that while having mostly-full magenta and yellow still.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    25. Re:A Scentsor? by Kijori · · Score: 1

      "Generating a system that would be flexible enough to cover a wide range of the "aroma space" is much more difficult."

      Not at all. The big mall we have here in town manages numerous smells during all business hours.

      I don't think he's referring to the ability to have a number of smells at once but rather the ability for one device to create any given smell; your mall example would only be capable of this by loading in canisters with all the smells you need, which is a less flexible solution.

    26. Re:A Scentsor? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "I don't think he's referring to the ability to have a number of smells at once but rather the ability for one device to create any given smell; your mall example would only be capable of this by loading in canisters with all the smells you need, which is a less flexible solution."

      I wasn't differentiating between some highly-technical mechanical dispersal system and some guy popping a different canister in a $5 dispenser mounted at each entrance, as they basically do the same thing.

    27. Re:A Scentsor? by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

      And you miss his point. One system capable of putting out different smells, such as the concept of smell-o-vision. Not a bunch of people polluting the air with their own smells at the same time, like your(and probably everyone else's) local mall.

      --
      sent from my slashdot browser.
    28. Re:A Scentsor? by Kijori · · Score: 1

      I wasn't differentiating between some highly-technical mechanical dispersal system and some guy popping a different canister in a $5 dispenser mounted at each entrance, as they basically do the same thing.

      I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. There are two parts to the system: smell creation and smell dispersal, and it's the first of these that I think was being referred to by the "aroma space". In the context of the comment that spawned this discussion - the idea of "Smell-O-Vision" - ideally you'd want to be able to continuously create the smells to match the action on-screen; in a 90-minute movie I suspect there would simply be too many smells to make individual smell canisters a real option, so you'd want a device that mixed new smells to be dispersed.

    29. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I don't have to read the billboard (unless it is square in my face and flashing) I don't really have an option when it comes to breathing. I agree that I shouldn't be a guinea pig for some marketing douche's idea.

      I feel bad for the people who work in those candle stores where the stink in them is so dense that they must carry it home on their clothes.

    30. Re:A Scentsor? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Yep ... but if they ever DID figure it out we'd be that much closer to a replicator.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    31. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An implant sending signals to your brain based on broadcasts your car relays.

    32. Re:A Scentsor? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      The solvent in printer ink is volatile, not the ink itself.

      Incorrect. Inks are liquids with suspended pigments/dyes in them. Once the solvent (water in most cases) evaporates it leaves the pigment/dye. At that point it is no longer ink. Therefore, it is correct to say that the ink is volatile, but not the pigments within them.

      I can see that you would need to choose the material you manufactured your cartridge out of carefully, but I think something like polyethylene would be suitable. However that is not the problem you implied in this quote:

      Couple that with the fact that aroma chemicals are, by necessity, volatile (otherwise you couldn't smell them) and you have a real problem with shelf-life too. If you had an olfactometer with a few hundred chemicals for producing smells, you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      It seemed to me strange that you would bring up that problem when it had already been solved by the product you were making a comparison with (a printer).

    33. Re:A Scentsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should wash your clothes

    34. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      The solvent in printer ink is volatile, not the ink itself.

      Incorrect. Inks are liquids with suspended pigments/dyes in them. Once the solvent (water in most cases) evaporates it leaves the pigment/dye. At that point it is no longer ink. Therefore, it is correct to say that the ink is volatile, but not the pigments within them.

      You're splitting hairs.

      I can see that you would need to choose the material you manufactured your cartridge out of carefully, but I think something like polyethylene would be suitable.

      And you'd be wrong. PE is not universally compatible with all the common aroma chemicals you might use.

      However that is not the problem you implied in this quote:

      Couple that with the fact that aroma chemicals are, by necessity, volatile (otherwise you couldn't smell them) and you have a real problem with shelf-life too. If you had an olfactometer with a few hundred chemicals for producing smells, you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      It seemed to me strange that you would bring up that problem when it had already been solved by the product you were making a comparison with (a printer).

      You are making the erroneous assumption that because this problem is solved fairly successfully in printers, which have odorless (or nearly odorless) solvents (so a slow leak isn't too much of a problem), a very limited set of chemicals (making selecting compatible materials easier) and that all will work with the same dispensing system (because they all have very similar physical properties, such as viscosity). This is not the case with a large palette of aroma chemicals. Some will work very well in an ink jet printer type cartridge. Others won't. Some will be too viscous to dispense through an ink jet nozzle, some will be not viscous enough (i.e. low surface tension) and will leak out an ink jet nozzle making it uncontrollable. Some will be so volatile that they will escape through any tiny gaps in the ink jet cartridge and will smell so intensely that they will contaminate the entire instrument.

      I would mention that early ink jets were largely shit. They gave crappy print quality, they leaked and they tended to splodge ink over the paper. It took years of development to reach the point we are at now to have systems that can accurately dispense inks relatively cleanly. And that's with the engineering challenge of only a very limited number of inks and the ability to reformulate the inks as needed (there are lots of ways to make a black ink, there are less ways to make a strawberry aroma). An olfactometer using something similar to ink jet technology would be a large engineering challenge which is why so many companies pop up with the idea that they are going to do something along those lines and then disappear again after a couple of years (see iSmell, Trisenx, etc).

    35. Re:A Scentsor? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they are not using actual components for smells, such as leather to produce the smell of leather

      Leather doesn't actually have "the smell of leather" naturally. The classic leather smell have always been artificial added chemicals. It used to be chemicals need to treat the leather, but they have stopped using them for that a long time ago, and for the last 40-50 years leather have been sprayed with leather-smell prior to sale, to give it that smell. So the shop is probably using "real" leather smell, the exact same smell they spray on the leather.

    36. Re:A Scentsor? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      I'm splitting hairs!?

      The solvent in printer ink is volatile, not the ink itself.

      Not only is that attempting to split hairs, it is also wrong.

      You are shifting ground. No where in

      Couple that with the fact that aroma chemicals are, by necessity, volatile (otherwise you couldn't smell them) and you have a real problem with shelf-life too. If you had an olfactometer with a few hundred chemicals for producing smells, you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      do you hint at material selection or seal problems. Reading through your post, the implication is that volatility isn't a problem that had to be overcome with printers.

      As for different viscosities; you could mix them with additives to reduce volatility and viscosity.

      One of the main problems with ink jets was clogging, because the ink has suspended solids in it, so as it dried it left gunge on the head. You would not have this problem with scents as they will evaporate completely.
      Also they do not need to be fired accurately only a piece of paper, they just need to be allowed to escape.

      Something like an aerosol can is a good example of how volatility and viscosity wouldn't be much of an issue. You can have extremely volatile and low viscosity chemicals (for example propanone) contained within a canister, under pressure (making the whole thing even harder!), yet it can all be effectively held back with a simple, cheap valve.

    37. Re:A Scentsor? by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Considering they do it for profit, I do not assume they are using known SAFE chemicals but rather chemicals that simply smell like what the customers want.

      Because the quickest road to profit is to kill/maim/dismember/cripple your customers, amirite?

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    38. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Couple that with the fact that aroma chemicals are, by necessity, volatile (otherwise you couldn't smell them) and you have a real problem with shelf-life too. If you had an olfactometer with a few hundred chemicals for producing smells, you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      do you hint at material selection or seal problems. Reading through your post, the implication is that volatility isn't a problem that had to be overcome with printers.

      I say nothing about printers in the part you quote. Volatility is one of many challenges, material compatibility, dispensing, sealing, chemical stability (one I haven't mentioned yet - some aroma chemicals will oxidize) are other challenges. Just because I didn't feel the need to enumerate all the problems in my first post I seem to have deeply offended you. Odd.

      I gave one example of a reason why it's hard. You countered with an example of how that problem has been tackled in another application. I gave some other challenges that exist.

      As for different viscosities; you could mix them with additives to reduce volatility and viscosity.

      And those additives have to be compatible with the wide range of aroma chemicals and add no aroma of their own. It's not a simple problem.

      One of the main problems with ink jets was clogging, because the ink has suspended solids in it, so as it dried it left gunge on the head. You would not have this problem with scents as they will evaporate completely.

      Actually I could imagine some (e.g. vanillin, melting point 80C and a VERY important aroma chemical) could clog the heads.

      Also they do not need to be fired accurately only a piece of paper, they just need to be allowed to escape.

      Not just escape, but escape cleanly leaving absolutely no carry over that will contaminate the next aroma. Not an easy task.

      Something like an aerosol can is a good example of how volatility and viscosity wouldn't be much of an issue. You can have extremely volatile and low viscosity chemicals (for example propanone) contained within a canister, under pressure (making the whole thing even harder!), yet it can all be effectively held back with a simple, cheap valve.

      And a lot of work goes into ensuring that perfumes for aerosols are compatible with that method of delivery.

      The point is not that it's impossible. The point is that it's a very difficult (more difficult than ink jet printing) and multi-faceted problem. [For what it's worth, I don't think ink jet technology would be the way to go either]. That is why there are no successful commercial products out there and why you don't see Sony or other large CE companies working in this space.

      And that's not even touching on the difficulty of coming up with a viable business plan for such a device. How much are you willing to pay to be able to smell somebody's BO during a movie?

    39. Re:A Scentsor? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      This discussion is getting very far away from the point I originally made

      you would be forever having to replace the chemicals because they have evaporated away.

      Is rather at odds with

      The point is not that it's impossible. The point is that it's a very difficult (more difficult than ink jet printing) and multi-faceted problem.

      If the underlying meaning of your statement was that keeping it in a closed container was difficult because of the differences in volatility, viscosity and chemical stability, then why did you word it in such an absolute manner? Or not make any hint to the reasoning behind the statement. If you don't do that, someone is going to come along and point out the flaw in your statement.

      Just because I didn't feel the need to enumerate all the problems in my first post I seem to have deeply offended you. Odd.

      I was not offended by your not pointing out all the problems, what is irritating is when you respond to my critique of your point as if you had already suggested that there were possible solutions. It is also rather infuriating when you try to nitpick my point, when it was entirely correct, and therefore make an incorrect statement, and then accuse me of splitting hairs when I point that out.

      Actually I could imagine some (e.g. vanillin, melting point 80C and a VERY important aroma chemical) could clog the heads.

      That is rather interesting. In the non-synthesised world is this carried to the nose as a solid, and then dissolved in mucus? Or is it dissolved in moisture in the air?

    40. Re:A Scentsor? by wjousts · · Score: 1

      I can't be bothered with the rest of your post but:

      Actually I could imagine some (e.g. vanillin, melting point 80C and a VERY important aroma chemical) could clog the heads.

      That is rather interesting. In the non-synthesised world is this carried to the nose as a solid, and then dissolved in mucus? Or is it dissolved in moisture in the air?

      I believe it sublimes (slowly) at room temperature.

  7. Other Smells by jdpars · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder what the billboards for the local strip clubs will smell like.

    1. Re:Other Smells by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more concerned with that billboard for Sceptic tank repair.

    2. Re:Other Smells by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder what the billboards for the local strip clubs will smell like.

      Sweaty perverts and broken dreams I imagine.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Other Smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap perfume and fish?

    4. Re:Other Smells by TheLink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh noes a tank full of unwashed sceptics...

      --
    5. Re:Other Smells by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmm... sushi!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Other Smells by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the billboards for the local strip clubs will smell like.

      Like meat also.

    7. Re:Other Smells by linzeal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ass, lotion and desperation.

    8. Re:Other Smells by KillaBeave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bath & Body Works mixed with equal parts sweat and shame.

    9. Re:Other Smells by Bysshe · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as the one for the local fish market.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    10. Re:Other Smells by M8e · · Score: 1

      I'm sceptic, you incensetive clod!

    11. Re:Other Smells by ricosalomar · · Score: 1

      You owe me a new monitor...

    12. Re:Other Smells by kramulous · · Score: 1

      And with any luck, salty tears.

      --
      .
    13. Re:Other Smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strwaberry everyone knows the smell of a strippers soul decaying has the sweet smell of strawberry

  8. Bet you didn't think of this by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what about people who get sick at the smell or sight of meat? Not all of us get all wet at the thought of eating a giant piece of cow. How is this different than wearing thick cologne or perfume, or slathering on aftershave to the point that the hallway still reeks of it hours after your passage? You know what, I'd rather smell burnt gas and diesel than half the things the general public slathers all over their body in the name of attracting the opposite sex. People who wear Axe and Old Spice, I'm looking at you.

    And now in addition to my daily routine of overly-scented people, they're adding overly-scented advertising? :( As if flashing, gyrating signs, sometimes moving and smoking, signs that are visible for miles wasn't enough. What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by PlasmaEye · · Score: 5, Funny

      What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

      Now that's what I call Fast Food.

    2. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The technology should be completely banned. It's hard enough for those with chemical sensitivities to go about their lives without getting sick as it is. Having billboards distributing fragrances which may or may not make people sick is just wrong. It's bad enough for those of us that just have easily irritated noses, I feel sorry for the people that get really sick.

    3. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what about people who get sick at the smell or sight of meat?

      I guess there’s just yet another place they’d have to avoid, as well as not being able to drive on half the streets in the city anyway because of various meat smells emanating from the restaurants and fast-food places.

      Then again, maybe it wouldn’t be as big a deal as you seem to think.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what about people who get sick at the smell or sight of meat?

      What about the people who get sick at the smell or sight vegatables?

      If it had been the smell of a fresh salad would you mind as much?

      Don't hold your breath, I don't think this idea will catch on.

    5. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure do complain a lot.

    6. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      Just hold your breath while driving past the billboard if you don't like it.

    7. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

      Don't give them ideas.

    8. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope they start selling this stuff in cans. I could use it as vegan repelent.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    9. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something should be banned nationwide because your wife doesn't like it. Wow, that is some seriously messed up perspective you've got there.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    10. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the terrorists have won

    11. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live near a facility that manufactures food flavorings and scented additives, most notably ALL the scented oils that are used in the production of a well-known national candle store. At times, depending on the temperature and density of air and the speed and direction of wind, the heavy combination of scents can linger. It's not too bad actually; it almost smells like incense, however I can see how some people could be irritated by it.

    12. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by GreenSquirrel2 · · Score: 1

      And what about people who get sick at the smell or sight of meat? Not all of us get all wet at the thought of eating a giant piece of cow. How is this different than wearing thick cologne or perfume, or slathering on aftershave...

      Maybe you could get Procter and Gamble to put a Febreze billboard up.

    13. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Macrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      (she has a strong nose).

      And she hasn't left you yet?

    14. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by StuartHankins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was told by several women that they didn't like Drakkar, Gio, Polo, Givenchy Pi, Joop, Oscar de la Renta, Quorum, Paloma's Minotaur, and Boss. At first I thought it was just the girl but it seems some actually prefer the cheap air-freshener scents. To prefer Bath and Body works or Old Spice / Coty / CK seems very alien to me. Maybe people are losing the ability to pick up some of the varied tones in these?

    15. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get sick at the sight or smell of meat then you are a pussy, and no one cares about you.

      Go hug a tree hippy. The rest of us have humpback to grill up for dinner.

    16. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      I'm betting the steak scented sign won't go over well in parts of India.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    17. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      I would have a headache 24/7 if I lived near or worked there. Ouchies.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    18. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your wife is an annoying twat.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    19. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Khyber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me pour some H2SO4 on you then, since you claim to not be sensitive to chemicals.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    20. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology should be completely banned. It's hard enough for those with chemical sensitivities to go about their lives without getting sick as it is. Having billboards distributing fragrances which may or may not make people sick is just wrong. It's bad enough for those of us that just have easily irritated noses, I feel sorry for the people that get really sick.

      Maybe you can move to a country that grants you the right to not be offended? Just sayin'.

    21. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      This shows just how little you need to get modded informative.

    22. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when someone farts, I personally choose not to breathe through my nose because I find the thought of smelling someone's butthole disgusting...

      But you are ok with tasting it?

    23. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably not a problem in North Carolina. The three people in NC who feel sick at the smell of meat (or Old Spice) have already left the state.

    24. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by CODiNE · · Score: 2, Funny

      People who wear Axe and Old Spice, I'm looking at you.

      Damn did I leave my webcam on again???

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    25. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Maybe people are losing the ability to pick up some of the varied tones in these?

      When you consider how much perfume is around; in laundry detergent, hand soap, deodorant, shampoo, household cleaning products, food, kitty litter, candles, etc., it's no surprise people have lost a sensitivity to smell. It's simply overwhelming to the point that the only option is to desensitize. In much the same way people lose the ability to hear over time due to over-stimulation, you can lose your sense of smell if you're constantly exposed to strong scents.

      Think of how subtle a fern smells, or the smell that comes just before it rains, when the trees and plants release their pollen due to the low pressure. These are the average everyday smells of our pre-industrial society. They have been replaced with vanilla, artificial berry smells, and bath smells like "rain" or "tropical delight", and the scent of burning asbestos from brake pads, diesel, gasoline, and ozone from electrical equipment.

      Is it any surprise people are losing the ability to smell subtle things? There's a smell competition going on amongst people -- especially women, but men too. "Get noticed! Wear Our Smelly Shit!" How many advertisements do you see in a given evening of TV that has a smell associated with it? Is it any surprise -- since smell is the sense most strongly tied to the emotion and memory centers of the brain?

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    26. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe... different people like different things. Perhaps we're NOT all clones of eachother. Just sayin'

    27. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Some people don't like any scents at all. What's wrong with smelling the way evolution intended us to smell? It didn't hurt our ancestors ability to attract mates. I know I like freshly washed natural female scent more than anything they could splash on. The important thing is just to be clean, and let nature do it's work from there.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    28. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

      Well since it doesn't smell like meat, but rather pepper and barbecue sauce you should have no problem.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    29. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me pour some H2SO4 on you then, since you claim to not be sensitive to chemicals.

      Oh NO! Not Sulfuric acid.

    30. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess there’s just yet another place they’d have to avoid, as well as not being able to drive on half the streets in the city anyway because of various meat smells emanating from the restaurants and fast-food places.

      Where do you live? I live in a part of San Francisco that literally has restaurants on every block, and there's no smells of meat even when walking by (and are, therefore, much closer and have a much longer time to notice the smell). Oh, right, you're just being a jackass.

    31. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Improv · · Score: 1

      Fortunately and hopefully the people who deface advertisements will get right on this. I don't ordinarily see a lot of point in covering or modifying adverts (although I don't mind either) - destroying scent-making devices like this gets a big thumbs up in my book.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    32. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by TheMiller · · Score: 1

      ... I feel sorry for the people that get really sick.

      On behalf of my wife, who has mast cell disease, thank you for the sentiment.

      This sort of frivolous pollution absolutely should be made illegal. What a monumental lack of common sense or consideration for others.

    33. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was told by several women that they didn't like Drakkar, Gio, Polo, Givenchy Pi, Joop, Oscar de la Renta, Quorum, Paloma's Minotaur, and Boss.

      There's the problem, you're wearing them all at once. Believe me, women don't like that, I know from experience.

    34. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Irritated isn't quite what I would call it.

      It takes 1 breath of air near scented candles to cause me "irritation". A few minutes of exposure to scented candles and I will have chest pain and trouble breathing. It takes 15 minutes of exposure to scented candles and I will actually start bleeding from my nose. More than that soon I will start vomiting.

      The chemicals used in many cleaning products and perfumes cause similar, but less severe reactions as well.

    35. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      That billboard is about an hour south of my house, but don't think I will be taking a drive to see. Considering that I drive past a county dump twice a day when commuting, (I85 @ Archdale), I would think this is a step up, at least.

      More importantly, why doesn't this thing have the smell of PORK? Anyone familiar with North Carolina would know this. It's only 90 miles from Lexington, NC, the self proclaimed BBQ capital of the world.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    36. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by unkiereamus · · Score: 1

      I think smoking should be banned country-wide because it makes my wife sick just to have the windows down in-town because of all the other drivers who are smoking.

      Tell her to start smoking, if she develops a 5 cigarette a day habit, the smell of others smoking won't bother her at all! (Well, it might make her want a cigarette.)

      Such a simple solution, I bet you're wondering why you didn't think of it yourself, no?

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    37. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Definitely isn't. In severe cases exposure to fragrance can lead to coma and even death. It doesn't affect everybody, but for those people that it does affect the consequences are potentially life threatening.

      Life threatening as in pining for the fjords, not something that a person just makes up.

      Beyond that making people smell that kind of crap is childish and immature. Perhaps it isn't the people that don't want to smell it that should grow up.

    38. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I know of at least one case locally where a woman was put into a coma by exposure to chemical fragrance. The idiot that did it to her had been warned more than a few times not to do it. One day he comes in wreaking of the stuff like he bathed in it. A few minutes later she was in a coma.

      She did eventually come out of it, but the brain damage was significant. A person would have to be a monster to not think that's fucked up. Though admittedly most people with sensitivities aren't that sensitive. But still.

    39. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about people who get sick at the smell or sight of meat?

      I don't think they're too worried about those people. They're not part of the target demographic for advertisements about a steakhouse.

    40. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

      Now that's what I call Fast Food.

      Or ice cream cones. Now that's what I call a Sticky Situation.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    41. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

      In severe cases exposure to fragrance can lead to coma and even death.

      I'd be interested in some good references for that assertion. A search of PubMed for "fragrance" (also tried "perfume" and "scent") and "coma" yielded nothing of the sort. Searching for "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity MCS" doesn't bring up any useful case studies either. It did however bring up this study(my emphasis):

      INTRODUCTION: Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is an acquired disorder with recurrent symptoms referable to multiple organ systems. No widely accepted test of physiologic function correlates with symptoms and it has not been recognized as a distinct entity by the scientific community. Few double-blind placebo-controlled studies have been done. The objectives of this study were to test two hypotheses: that patients with MCS can distinguish reliably between solvents and placebo, and that there are significant differences in objective biological and neuropsychological parameters between solvent and placebo exposures. METHODS: Twenty patients with MCS and 17 controls underwent six exposure sessions (solvent mixture and clean air in random order, double-blind) in a challenge chamber. Positive reactions were defined as subjective perception of being exposed to solvents, blood pressure or heart rate change of > or = 10%, rash or clinical signs of hypoxia, or symptom severity rise after exposure. RESULTS: No differences between the groups with regard to sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were found. Cognitive performance was not influenced by solvent exposure, and did not differ between the groups. There was no difference between the groups in serum cortisol levels measured before and after exposures. CONCLUSION: The hypotheses were not confirmed.

      As far as modern science can tell us, those with MCS cannot distinguish between solvents and placebo AND there are no significant differences in objective biological and neuropsychological parameters between solvent and placebo exposures.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    42. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, go for broke with ClF3. Reactive enough to burn sand.

    43. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Citation, or it didn't happen.

    44. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Johnny was a chemist,
      Johnny is no more,
      for what Johnny though was H2O
      was H2SO4

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    45. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Turbio · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add some drops of water to get excitingly hot!

    46. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's fortunate that the world doesn't have to cater to the LCD, you.

    47. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Turbio · · Score: 1

      Just hold your breath while driving past the billboard if you don't like it.

      And if you don't like the billboard, you can close your eyes too. Just don't make any wheel corrections with your eyes closed! Seriously, even the billboards themselves are too invasive for my taste.

    48. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation:
      1] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Re: CHECK THIS OUT!!!!

    49. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point. No, I don't think smoking should be banned - it generates too much export revenue. What you failed to understand was that you can't complain about charcoal and black pepper when so many people blow smoke into our air. If you reason that the smell offends you and therefore it shouldn't be allowed, then smoking would have to be banned first.

    50. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I don’t live in San Francisco, and, as I have found that you can smell the tasty odors while driving past just about any KFC or Burger King at the right time of day (just to name a few fast food venues off the top of my head, but I’ve noticed it at real restaurants as well)... I’m skeptical of your claim.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    51. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Some women like the smell of Old Spice because that's what their Daddy smelled like.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    52. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I live near a facility that manufactures food flavorings and scented additives, most notably ALL the scented oils that are used in the production of a well-known national candle store. At times, depending on the temperature and density of air and the speed and direction of wind, the heavy combination of scents can linger. It's not too bad actually; it almost smells like incense, however I can see how some people could be irritated by it.

      I'd much rather live there than living a few miles from a paper mill when I was a kid.

    53. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's because people "afflicted" with MCS are the same population who believe in alien abductions. They're simply bored individuals who feel the need to create ailments to give them something to talk about and obsess over. I know a girl who claims she has both MCS and fibromyalgia and the only time she ever complains about either is when she's in a situation where she doesn't want to do something. Hang out with her friends? Cool. Go shopping at the mall? Cool. Go to Wal-Mart to pick up some cat food? Fibro! Oh, it hurts so much! Take a trip to the art museum? Cool. Go shopping with her boyfriend at the mall for a pair of shoes? MCS! The fragrances at the perfume counter suddenly become overwhelming, even though she doesn't have to go anywhere near the same side of the mall!

    54. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by boneclinkz · · Score: 0

      I know of at least one case locally where a woman was put into a coma by exposure to chemical fragrance. The idiot that did it to her had been warned more than a few times not to do it. One day he comes in wreaking of the stuff like he bathed in it. A few minutes later she was in a coma. She did eventually come out of it, but the brain damage was significant. A person would have to be a monster to not think that's fucked up. Though admittedly most people with sensitivities aren't that sensitive. But still.

      The extent to which I am skeptical of this story is almost hard to quantify.

      I'm pretty much expecting a punchline like "yeah, he comes in reeking of old spice, hits her in the head with a hammer, and bam, she's in a coma!"

    55. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you didn't make your case.

      First, you are arguing backward. The cited failure to prove that MCS exists does not demonstrate that it does not exist. All it showed with any credibility is that a particular group of 20 people appear to be hypochondriacs. Second, from the abstract of that paper it is also impossible to tell whether the solvent used was one that any of the 20 claimed to be sensitive to. (It probably was, otherwise it would have been silly to do this study in the first place, but silly studies are done all the time. Look up the "Ig Nobel" prizes.) And further, even if it was a chemical they claimed to be sensitive to, the subjects themselves could have mistaken it for something else. If they can be mistaken about being sensitive at all, they can certainly be mistaken about what they are sensitive to.

      Probably more to the point, however, is that we already know that chemical sensitivity exists. There are examples around you all the time. A reaction to poison ivy or poison oak is due to a sensitivity to the chemical urushiol. And some people do not react to it. So not only do we know sensitivity exists, we also know it varies from person to person.

      Yet another example: "contact allergies". We know they exist, and we know that some people suffer from them, some do not. Usually, an allergy of this sort is a reaction to some chemical (even if it's a protein, it's still a chemical).

      So while conditions like MCS may or may not exist, we know that chemical sensitivity does exist. It may be worse in some people than in others, and some people may exaggerate or even make up symptoms, but chemical sensitivity is a reality and it can be fatal: a boy in my area died a few years ago because a teacher gave him a peanut butter cookie. Go ahead. Tell me his death was psychosomatic. Maybe his parents would like to hear about it, too.

    56. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

      Yes.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    57. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I think I made my case that MCS was questionable at least. Of course, it's impossible to prove that MCS does not exist. You cannot prove a negative. However, it's not always the case that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. The fact that 20 out of 20 participants in this study were hypochondriacs is pretty suggestive. Either MCS does not exist, or nearly 100% of MCS sufferers are misdiagnosed.

      Poison ivy and peanut allergies do exist, of course. They don't have much to do with multiple chemical sensitivity though. If you did a double blind study with these substances, I guarantee you they'd be able to distinguish placebo. MCS sufferers cannot. What's the difference? One is real, the other is not.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    58. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      I live near a facility that manufactures food flavorings and scented additives, most notably ALL the scented oils that are used in the production of a well-known national candle store.

      IFF smells better than the rest of New Jersey, though. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    59. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I notice this, too. I frequently realize that I do not notice (upon waking) the smell of cat poop in the litter boxes, or the (good) smell of something my wife's cooking. Sometimes I can't even notice it when I am trying to pay attention to it.

    60. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      The technology should be completely banned. It's hard enough for those with chemical sensitivities to go about their lives without getting sick as it is. Having billboards distributing fragrances which may or may not make people sick is just wrong. It's bad enough for those of us that just have easily irritated noses, I feel sorry for the people that get really sick.

      Agreed. Also what happens when a competitor next door wants to do it, do they just have to try to overpower each other with stronger scents? I think the closest analogy is PA systems/loudspeakers. It's a public common they're trying to usurp, it's one thing when it's incidental smell/noise to their operations and another to pump it out to the public.

    61. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Certainly, I agree that study does make MCS look pretty improbable.

      But my main point -- which I probably did not make very clear -- is that you seemed to be making the claim that chemical sensitivity in general is psychosomatic. But MCS is only one very tiny part of that subject. The fact that MCS may not exist is a pretty weak argument for the case that chemical sensitivities in general don't exist, because we know of lots of everyday chemical sensitivities that do exist.

    62. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Ooo, free peeling !

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    63. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Once living near the chocolate factory side of town, the smell cocoa in the mornings was intoxicating! :D

    64. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by wye43 · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of us get sick at the sight of vegans.

      Vegetables are what food eats!
      http://www.cafepress.co.uk/moderatesayings.52247492

    65. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      No leaf for me, Gimme real veges! I prefer the smell of plants to the smell of having your intestines dragged through your nasal cavity.

    66. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife is an annoying twat.

      True, but she has a twat, so she makes the rules.

    67. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Misagon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am appaled that the post above was moderated as "Funny".
      This is a serious problem for many people, and that is not a joke!

      Myself, I would suffer a migraine attack from 15 minutes exposure of the wrong type of scented candles (some are OK, some are not, it depends on the chemical in the scent).
      And even if I can "cure" the migraine with medicine, that medicine has side-effects such as nausea, sleepiness and sluggishness .. and can have an adverse effect on your body in the long term.
      I have had to make the cleaning woman at the office change to using different cleaning products so that I wouldn't suffer migraines there.
      I have to change seats in the subway if someone with strong perfume seats herself (it is usually an older woman) too close to me.
      This is no joke.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    68. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      What next, shooting french fries at passing motorists?

      Now that's what I call Fast Food.

      Or ice cream cones. Now that's what I call a Sticky Situation.

      I scream,
      You scream,
      We all scream fo-- oh god, my eyes! The goggles do nothing!

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    69. Re:Bet you didn't think of this by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Very true, but it's not IFF rather Kerry, formerly called MasterTaste (but your NJ id is spot on). The only reason I know what they make is because a friend used to work in the factory when it was called MasterTaste. What disturbs me is that it's a food flavoring company, yet they're making candle scents.

      Speaking of food flavorings, my coworker's father was a flavor chemist at Monsanto and is responsible for the flavorings of several popular candy and juice products. For being the individual responsible for these remarkable developments, you'd think he would have been compensated more for his accomplishments.

  9. EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmm...I wonder if something like this requires an environmental impact report. Could those scents be toxic?

    --
    Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    1. Re:EIR by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is North Carolina. I think smoking is still mandatory there.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    2. Re:EIR by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Like breathing the fumes from hundreds of cars per minute isn't toxic...

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha!!! I guess I'm a spoiled Californian. We need an EIR to fart.

      --
      Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    4. Re:EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 1

      True. However, it must have been much, much worse in the 70's before California's ground-breaking emissions laws. As it is, I start gagging when I find myself behind a 60's era muscle car.

      --
      Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    5. Re:EIR by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I hear you.. I often wonder if all the cars of the era smelled like that, if it's a side effect of burning modern fuels in an older engine, or if the old engine itself isn't properly tuned (fuel/air mixture, timing, etc.).

      None of the 60's era muscle cars I've seen drag strips smell like that, and they're all carbureted and burning pump gasoline (not leaded or oxygenated racing fuel or specialty fuels). My guess is that it's related to carburetor tuning. Come to think of it, I've seen plenty of 80s and early 90s era cars that smell just as bad, despite having some emissions controls - maybe it is more closely related to the timing and fuel/air mixture than anything else.

    6. Re:EIR by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And yet, somehow, people in the 60s managed to not whine like little cunts whenever they walked down the street.

      I'm not saying I don't want clean air, but you fags that get the vapors every time you detect the slightest scent that isn't your own b.o., patchouli, or hummus are twice as irritating as anything I've ever breathed, and I used to smoke.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    7. Re:EIR by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering about the environmental impact of all the stray dogs that are probably wandering in from downwind.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    8. Re:EIR by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's more related to complete combustion more than anything else. Next big issue is burning oil in the fuel mixture.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:EIR by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      This is North Carolina. I think smoking is still mandatory there.

      Well Altria shipped all is manufacturing to Richmond, VA - so I think that smoking is no longer compulsory (for tweens at least)

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    10. Re:EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 1

      That's funny (and trolling at the same time--but, hey, I can take a little name-calling).

      I live next to a Mexican market. I get treated to the aroma of barbequeing chickens each weekend and frequently the smell of rotting meat from the rendering bin. While, as a vegetarian, I find both aromas nauseating, I don't usually complain. They're a business doing business. If it was too odious, I could move.

      Now, what the article describes is not a "natural" aroma and isn't a byproduct of somebody performing their usual business functions.

      BTW, I *do* prefer BO (my own or others') to the irritating chemical aroma of most antiperspirants/deoderants.

      While we humans are remarkably resilient, we are at the same time pretty darn sensitive. At a certain point, with so many environmental irritants, our bodies' ability to cope fails and illnesses arise.

      --
      Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    11. Re:EIR by cosm · · Score: 1

      Nope. The indoor smoking ban finally hit us this year. Also, no smoking within 50-feet of a public building. G.S.130A-497. And yet we are still proliferated with Tobacco fields. Go figure.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    12. Re:EIR by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Go visit a hospital, you will smell nothing but harsh chemical disinfectants, and the occasional shit, pus, or rotting infection. Hundreds of thousands of people work in that all day, every day, for years and years and years and years and years, and are just fine.

      You are a gigantic over-sensitive faggot who whines at levels of discomfort that most people wouldn't even notice and are made uncomfortable by things that are mostly invented in your own head, just accept it and don't try to apologize or justify or even mitigate it, and you will be a lot less annoying.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    13. Re:EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 1

      People are just fine--until they aren't. When we reach our limits, things tend to go downhill fast. Obviously, doing healthy things like eating well (veg or not), getting exercise, etc., can mitigate (to use your word) the stressors. Chances are, though, they'll eventually catch up.

      Of course, chances are I'll get killed by a car while biking to work one day despite my best efforts to lead a healthy life. You've made it perfectly clear you wouldn't be shedding any tears.

      Cheers!

      --
      Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    14. Re:EIR by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By mitigate, I mean mitigate your annoyance to others. Don't hide it, you're a fruitcake, just be a fruitcake. But acting like you're saving my fucking life and I should be eternally grateful because you got "chemical" smells banned offends me infinitely more than even your awful b.o. You're doing it because you've concocted some weird theory of irritants and health meters and are worried that your own health meter is red and flashy, so don't pretend to give a shit about others when you know for a fact that even if it was discovered that the smell of tetra-hydra-peroxipterodactyl added 10 years to your life and b.o. caused impotence you wouldn't change a thing.

      Also as annoying as I personally find your kind, I don't wish a bike accident or anything on you, and I wouldn't be happy in even the smallest way if you did get plowed by a Dow Chemical delivery truck while biking and coughing your high-pitched cough through the inner city to the farmer's market that's taking up all the fucking parking in my office complex.

      I mean, I wouldn't cry 'cause I'm not a fag, but I would genuinely feel bad for you and your family.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re:EIR by MightyMait · · Score: 1

      Truly laughing out loud!! I'm touched.

      Well, I'm off for a lunch-time run (barefoot, naturally). As you observe, I'm a fruitcake (just don't tell my girlfriend (who loves my BO, BTW))

      I wish you long-life, good health, and fewer annoyances to distract you from enjoying it.

      --
      Nothing interesting to say...MUST...NOT...REPLY...ohtheheckwithit.
    16. Re:EIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars have catalytic converters on them now. They are very effective.

    17. Re:EIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it "was" until just a few months ago when even Winston Salem, of all places, adopted policy prohibiting smoking in public places despite private property ownership rights.

  10. Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually smells just like chicken.

  11. Think about the vegans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We want billboards that smell like BBQ'd vegans!

  12. It's been tried by confused+one · · Score: 1

    iSmell but the product failed because it stank (that, and there was no 3rd party software written to support it)

    1. Re:It's been tried by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      Sure it wasn't because apple sued them?

  13. Oh boy by U8MyData · · Score: 1

    Another freaking marketing "too.l" Ugh. I wonder what Viagra smells like? You know it's coming...

    1. Re:Oh boy by localman57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Old Spice.

    2. Re:Oh boy by darth+dickinson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what Viagra smells like? You know it's coming...

      Looks like you just answered your own question.

    3. Re:Oh boy by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Hand lotion.

    4. Re:Oh boy by dbet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Old Spice.

      Ladies look at me, now back at the road, now back to me, now look at that tree you're about to hit.

  14. Post from The Future! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    ScentAir, The Silent Killer
    by Mavra Chang, Reuters, New York
    June 9, 2023

    The advertising world took another hit as the 1000th case of brain cancer from the ScentAir advertising campaign was announced today...

    1. Re:Post from The Future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a Well of Souls reference? Haven't seen one of those in awhile...

  15. Tag by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    Why isn't this tagged smellovision?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  16. Obligatory statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a vegetarian, I find this billboard scent deeply offensive.

  17. Scooped by NPR??? by Itninja · · Score: 4, Informative

    NPR covered this a week go. Granted, this is idle, but come on...

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Scooped by NPR??? by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's 'tech'. Sigh.

  18. Uhm, vision? by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1

    Because you don't smell with your visual senses. Try teleolfactory, maybe?

  19. Smells like shame! by strayant · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, would a billboard for a strip club smell like shame?

    1. Re:Smells like shame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, tuna fish.

  20. It's good to know by matunos · · Score: 1

    It's good to know that science has our best interests at heart. Who needs cancer cures or alternative energy, when there's steak with which for us to fill our fattened gullets?

    1. Re:It's good to know by mace9984 · · Score: 1

      Amen!

  21. Aromatherapy for Men by jolyonr · · Score: 1

    Mmm... those smells are helping me relax, putting me in a happy place. Now gimme my damn steak.

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  22. Some one call the WAAAHMBULANCE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TO OP: I think you should sue, who ever you eat from; because of the noxious gases that escape your orrifices.

    The methane & sulfur Dioxide you release; are tantamount to killing the planet and offending others.

  23. Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As we all know, perceived taste is ~90% olfactory. If I sit under this billboard to eat a hamburger, will I be a pirate?

    1. Re:Piracy by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      No. You'd be a pirate if you somehow managed to rip it to VCD size and torrent it.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  24. Where is the EPA? by dwiget001 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why isn't the EPA all over this? It could be contribution to global warming, for crying out loud!

  25. So by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    The target demographic is people who don't use air conditioning and/or drive down the highway with their windows down?

    Cute idea. Wonder if anyone will actually manage to "smell" it. I guess the optional brick throwing machine that broke car windows as they pass was just too tricky.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:So by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      Unless you have the air in your car recycling air from inside the car, the air confditioner or heater will be pulling in outside air, even when the windows are up.

      Even with in-cabin recycling I still get whiffs of skunk and other powerful scents when driving on the highway.

      I use it mostly to avoid other people's exhaust fumes in slow traffic.

    2. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for driving an american car.

  26. Presenting the new trends on spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the olfactive spam!

  27. When will it stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Probably on the 10th or so time Animal Control gets called about the packs of stray dogs surrounding and defending the billboard...

  28. Traffic Jam? by StevenMattera · · Score: 0

    I do hope they have some kind of remote kill switch for if there is a traffic jam... I understand getting a whiff of it, but being stuck breathing that in for a hour or two could make a person sick.

  29. Adult entertainment by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    For a pr0n store - What about a billboard scented with ... ahem, female smells?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Adult entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bonus is scent development costs could be shared with Red Lobster's ad campaign.

  30. New Trend? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    Uh, oh! Please don't give these guys any ideas! They'll have the entire stretch of I-40 from Albuquerque to Oklahoma City smelling like one big steak!

  31. Obligatory response by halivar · · Score: 1

    At a meatetarian, I find your righteous indignation deeply amusing.

  32. Ob portal... by chooks · · Score: 1, Funny

    The steak is a lie!

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    1. Re:Ob portal... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      The steak is ribeye!

  33. Some companies should refrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So long as Bandini Fertilizer doesn't do a Bandini Mountain billboard with scents to go with I'm okay with it.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bandini%20Mountain

  34. just what we needed...not by mschaffer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Great.
    A device designed to distract, pollute, and encourage obesity.

    1. Re:just what we needed...not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's designed to irritate whiny little bitches like you.

    2. Re:just what we needed...not by nottheusualsuspect · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you bunch of fat, fat fatties! Eating something that smells and tastes good is BAD for you, you fat bunch of dummies! Dammit, Lardo Calrissian, quit eating food that smells good! Eat that frakkin carob I gave you, fatass!

  35. LOL by houbou · · Score: 1

    Billboards with food scent... Smelling of Steak! That should get PETA in an uproar.. unless PETA stands for Preparation and Eating of Tasty Animals :)

    1. Re:LOL by Bysshe · · Score: 1

      HAHA or PETA gets smart, puts a billboard right next to it with chemicals that interact with the steak chemicals to make the whole cloud smell vile.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  36. Pollution by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    To me this is pure un-adulterated outright pollution. The Adv company is deliberately releasing odors into the atmosphere. And I bet they do no have an EPA license to do so.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Pollution by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      To me this is pure un-adulterated outright pollution. The Adv company is deliberately releasing odors into the atmosphere. And I bet they do no have an EPA license to do so.

      I would agree. But really, pollution implies that what is being emitted is harmful. Is this really harmful? I doubt that it is nearly as harmful as the carbon emissions from vehicles. I'll also bite that it is creepy but cool at the same time. I means

  37. Re: Air Pollution by meustrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess I won't be traveling through North Carolina then, because my wife is vegetarian and the smell of some meat is now disturbing to her. I'm told it's pretty universal for people who have not eaten meat in a long time to feel nauseous at the smell of strong meats like bacon or barbecue.

    --
    I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
  38. +1 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just shit my pants a little

  39. Re: Air Pollution by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

    Yup, vegetarian here and I agree 100%

  40. Yech! by woboyle · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a vegetarian for 2/3 of my life I have to say... yech! I dislike the smell of burnt animal flesh immensely! I don't have to stay inside when my neighbors are barbecuing, but my toleration levels are stretched come 4th of July.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  41. Re: Air Pollution by chronosan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's called a craving, it only feels bad because your body chemistry is messed up from eating too much processed soy products. Also in your head, like the difference between being tickled and .... aroused.

  42. Location, location, location... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we get one of these mounted here in Norfolk, Va near the PETA office?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  43. more distractions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drivers don't need yet another unnecessary distraction.

  44. Porn drives all innovation by sharkey · · Score: 1

    I am NOT looking forward to the stinkboards advertising the Assgasms series.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  45. *WOOSH* by justinlee37 · · Score: 0, Troll

    10/10, epic troll. Seriously dude, fuck the cologne, fuck the deodorant, all you need is the natural scent of an alpha male.

    We cover up our body's natural sweat and pheromones (which has been chosen by evolution to attract the opposite sex) with cheap, disgusting, overpowering, unnatural scents. It makes no sense. Furthermore, some of those colognes, like Realm, advertise having "natural pheromones." Isn't that ironic? Here's an idea, genius, skip the $50 cologne "pheromones" and use the pheromones in your sweat that you already have.

    /end rant

  46. Necco Wafer Factory by drunkenkatori · · Score: 1

    Thinking of such things, I am reminded of walking past the Necco Wafer factory in Cambridge on a winter day when they are making the mint wafers...

  47. Animals by FishTankX · · Score: 1

    In other news, a large population of very confused looking bears has congregated at the base of the billboard. No damage has been caused to the billboard... yet.

  48. Leave It to Beaver Flashback by kenjay · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Leave It to Beaver episode "In the Soup"--Jerry Mathers falls into the billboard bowl of "steaming soup." http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0630257/plotsummary

  49. um... by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    Wheres the beef?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where%27s_the_beef%3F

  50. Bacon Over Radio by clevertwit · · Score: 1

    Growing up in the 80's in Rochester, NY, a local radio station - 98PXY - claimed they were testing a new technology that would allow them to send smells over the air to your radio's. At the given time during their morning show, they claimed they were sending a smell -- BACON -- and people were calling in swearing that they could smell it coming from their boomboxes (it was the 80's). ~sigh~ People are soooooooo gullible.

  51. Re: Air Pollution by Jahf · · Score: 1

    Charcoal and Black Pepper aren't actually meat smells. Most of what you smell when you salivate about BBQ isn't meat. It is the aromatics. And most of the veggies I know still LOVE the smell of BBQ smoke as long as it's relatively clean smoke (not seared fat, etc). Especially pagan veggies since it ALSO has the aroma of a good incense charcoal.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  52. Going a bit too far? by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one here that thinks this is a bit invasive? I mean sure, I don't like billboards anyway - I think they are a distraction. Of course, you can choose not to look at them (for the most part). It would be, IMHO, a bit like a billboard that shouted "HEY! LOOK AT ME!" at high volumes to everyone. Will advertisers not stop until they've saturated all 6 senses without our consent?

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  53. And another... by Psaakyrn · · Score: 1

    Billboard Ad for vegetarians: We don't stink!

  54. Ozone gives me a headache by protektor · · Score: 1

    All these people who talk about you can't be allergic to certain scents. I am here to tell you that I am. I have a physical reaction, and have been tested by several different doctors for allergies and yes I have them. I have been tested by ENT (auto-laryngologists) and a dermatologist. Some things when they land on my skin break me out, and certain dyes and colors do the same thing from products like laundry soap, and body washes. Also certain things I smell make my eyes water and nose run and create drainage for me.

    I can also tell you that those air clears that are electric that create ozone to clean the air. They give me one serious headache. I can smell them the second they are turned on, and a few moments after they are turned off I know it. It only takes about 5-10 minutes of smelling them before I start to get a headache, and if it continues I end up with a migrane. So it wouldn't suprise me if people would be allergic to charcoal or pepper smell that this billboard is putting out. Seems like something that shouldn't be allowed to be forced on to the general public. You can do whatever you want until it begins to be a problem for others. I think I once heard it put as "your right to swing your fists/hands, ends at my nose" or something to that effect. Seems the same should apply here.

  55. NJ Turnpike by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Nothing new here. For years, the smells along the NJ Turnpike have been subliminally advertising BP.

  56. Fuck mods yo by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    Word.