Slashdot Mirror


More Users Are Shunning Facebook

Hugh Pickens writes "Blake Snow writes that evidence suggests that a small but increasing number of users — at least in North America, where Facebook use is especially saturated — may be shunning the site with Facebook losing nearly 6 million users, falling from 155.2 million at the start of May to 149.4 million at the end of the month, the first time the US has lost users in the past year. Some users complain they're spending so much time on Facebook that they're short-changing the rest of their lives. 'I figured out that I wouldn't look back as an old man and wish I had spent more time on Facebook,' says David Cole, an IT manager from Boston, adding that he believes the popular social-networking site is a useful tool, but not a replacement for what he calls 'realbook' experiences. Kip Krieger, a college student from Virginia, says Facebook has become predictable. 'It's really gotten to a point where I know pretty much what my friends are going to post. They usually just write the same thing over and over again, and I am getting sick of that.' Still there are a lot more satisfied customers of Facebook than disgruntled ones, so are Facebook shunners a tiny minority or part of a growing trend? 'Having that connection with others is a very powerful thing,' says Toby Bushman who felt so much pressure that she decided to rejoin Facebook, and is glad she did. 'It makes me feel like I'm a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life as a stay-at-home mother.'"

411 comments

  1. Facebook is a good tool by cgeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, what are they expecting? That their friends are there to entertain them 24/7? I don't expect MSN Messenger to entertain me all the time either, why would I expect Facebook to do so. It's a communication tool. I've found it really useful, especially since I'm living in different sides of the world every half a year and having friends, wife and a family in both. But I don't expect it to stop hunger or give world peace.

    1. Re:Facebook is a good tool by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope your wives and families don't read /.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Facebook is a good tool by SMoynihan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. One doesn't blame the mail service because one has sent out invites for spammers to send spam letters.

      Facebook enables you to keep in touch with those you want to keep in touch with. If you are finding that those you friend send more trash than value, there is a simple answer:

      Don’t friend them.

      Seriously, if you don't want to spend time listening to drivel - you would avoid the drivelers - not cut off your ears (well, I hope not).

      Caveat emptor: If you end up with no friends, it is likely a statement on your standards, or your choice of acquaintances.

    3. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For someone like you Facebook would be a boon, but you're the exception. Me, I really have no use for it. I have an "unlimited" cell phone plan (don't pay for minutes, $50 per month flat fee for calls, long distance, roaming, text, internet, and email) and can call, text, or email anybody I know for free.

      I think it's a fad, like Hula hoops, pet rocks, mood rings, and... um, what's the name of that social networking site everybody was on a few years ago? I've forgotten. Chances are in five years everybody will have forgotten Facebook as well.

    4. Re:Facebook is a good tool by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It is as much of a tool or a time suck as you want it to be. Some of my friends are on every game on there, and zone out all the time. I use it for contacts and events only. They spend 30 hours a week, I spend 1. Works for me, and I guess for them.

    5. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Xest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I don't think TFA is even true, this story has popped up elsewhere over the last few days, Slashdot is a bit late getting to it. Facebook themselves and another 3rd party have both said these numbers are bunk, and I think they're probably right.

      The same study suggests 1.5million Canadians also quit in a single month, that's 5% of Canada's entire population quitting Facebook in May. Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May? For this to be realistic there'd almost certainly have to have been some good reason why so many chose that specific month to all leave together but I'm not aware of any event that would've caused such a mass exodus.

      I think Facebook might well be in slight decline in early adopting countries, but to the degree, with the numbers listed in TFA? Seems pretty unlikely, the numbers are just far too large for so many people to coincidentally all just pick one month to leave.

      The original articles on it suggested it was about privacy, but perhaps more realistically people haven't actually quit because of privacy, but have in fact boosted their privacy settings causing problems for whatever arbitrary method was used to measure these user counts.

      I couldn't really care what happens to Facebook personally, but I'm sick of seeing this story because frankly, it seems to almost certainly be completely and utterly full of shit- a classic attention whoring attempt using sensationalist tosh.

    6. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The key is to know what Facebook is good for, and what it is not. As a gaming platform, it's awful - and yet people gladly surrender not only their time but their marketable data and often real money to play idiotic, plotless dreck like Mafia Wars and Farmville.

      On the other hand, it's great for quickly disseminating news, vacation photos, etc. that I'd like to share with friends and family (and NO others) all at once, and conversely, find out when friends and family have important news --- someone has graduated, someone is in the hospital, someone got abducted by aliens and is now Elvis' love slave on Europa...

      I don't even mind using it as a discussion forum occasionally, although it's ill-suited for that (no way to search past discussions, no threaded replies, etc.) Sometimes a friend will feel strongly enough about some item in the news that he or she will post a rant, and it's interesting to see the various responses from the friends of that friend. I've also been able to crowdsource when I needed ideas quickly to solve a problem.

      On the other other hand, hanging on Facebook 24/7 and announcing every time you fart or move from one room to another or what you just ate... give it a rest, guys. Fortunately not many of my friends are that wrapped up in FB or themselves that they need to do so, just a couple of colleagues from work.

      And as far as security, you just have to be aware of the flaws and don't do anything that could make you the victim of identity theft (or get you fired). Don't post your home address or phone number; in that spot I tell people to message me privately if they need that and do not have it. Don't announce when you are going to leave the house empty for two weeks at a time. Don't brag about doing something illegal, or against company policy, or whatever. And for the love of all that is binary, don't give stupid apps permission to access your private data, or answer intrusive questions about yourself just because some stupid app wants you to.

    7. Re:Facebook is a good tool by cgeys · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between phone and Facebook. I won't always want to call people to ask how they're doing and I won't call someone if I see something fun or interesting on the internet. I also won't do that via email, because sending useless stuff personally like that isn't just nice, neither for you or the receiver. Facebook on the other hand lets you do that without getting too personal or intimate. It's especially good for people you see sometimes but really don't have that much to talk with. I also won't be calling some old friends all the time, but from Facebook I can randomly see those things.

    8. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > someone got abducted by aliens and is now Elvis' love slave on Europa...

      Attempt no philandering there.

    9. Re:Facebook is a good tool by phoenixwade · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does having wives in different countries qualify as Bigamy?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    10. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Try IRC. There's someone there to entertain you 24/7. And it's a lot harder for your indiscretions on IRC to get back to your family or employer. It's even gotten me laid. YMMV.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a LOT of people that have quit facebook... quit as in changed to only looking at it for a few minutes once a week.

      Why? because FB has made it an annoying piece of crap. you cant block all stupid game requests by default. now they allow fricking apps to post to your wall, and they stop showing you people that you have not commented on any of their stuff in the past 30 days.

      Facebook utterly sucks compared to a year ago.. It's fricking turning into MySpace.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what's wrong with just using MSN Messenger (or other IM network) for communication? I've never used any of the social networking web sites simply because I've never seen the value in them. My IM client, email and/or phone are plenty for staying in touch with friends, family and business contacts.

    13. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like lots of people don't realize that FB is more than just inane status updates from friends. I also use it as an RSS feed, since I subscribe to pages from various bands, sports teams, companies, etc. Now I can get all my news in one place, instead of having to go out to several individual web sites.

    14. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont disagree with you except for your gaming platofrm comment. It has one large advantage in that its free. Free beer is good beer.

    15. Re:Facebook is a good tool by slackzilly · · Score: 1

      Why may? The rapture happened on may 21. That's why. *poof* and all the righteous people disappeared.

      --
      - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
    16. Re:Facebook is a good tool by ifrag · · Score: 1

      quit as in changed to only looking at it for a few minutes once a week.

      Heh, if that's the criteria used then I've never actually been "on" facebook. I'm guessing that's what the article means, since it's supposedly impossible to really delete yourself from it completely.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    17. Re:Facebook is a good tool by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Word... I got sucked in during the early days when there wasn't really much to do other than play Mafia Wars (I blame my wife, it was one of the few games she's ever gotten into). Was primarily interested in figuring out the game mechanic, as well as marveling at their psychological hacking techniques (pure genius... if only someone would apply this type of random reward & leveling system to education, we could work wonders, or churn out our own suicide bombers, or at least do something amazing). Anyway, after playing through some of our cultural heritage "campaigns" (Moscow and Bangkok), got stuck on some glitch and took that opportunity to quit cold turkey and never looked back.

      But then a lot of my childhood friends started popping up, and now that a lot of these "too cool for facebook" people are finally leaving, it's actually becoming kind of nice again.

    18. Re:Facebook is a good tool by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's also the question of what Facebook counts as a user. I've got a bare page there, just so that friends of friends can track me. Never posted anything, barely go to visit friends' pages once a month when I'm bored, and when I get the facebook "please come baaaack" email.

      I find my life not *that* interesting that I want to make a "book" out of it. And the interesting parts, are, mostly, too private to entrust to facebook. The same seems to be true about my friends' lives, except they do post, and ave no qualms about private stuff, mostly.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    19. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound fat.

    20. Re:Facebook is a good tool by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I don't know is how these numbers are measured. These numbers don't come from FB but third parties and rely on things like "unique visitors" and ad traffic. Depending on the methodology, the measurements can be subject to external factors. Anything that relies on ads is subject to ad blocking. Counting on visitors might be skewed if they are counting MAC addresses, IP addresses etc. For example the drop in May in Canada can be attributed to university students going home after the school year and everyone using the family computer instead of their own.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It always strikes me that Facebook is like some overblown school reunion. People whom you would never ordinarily consider contacting are drawn into the endless feedback loop of a social networking site that uses emotional blackmail to keep you there. If you want to quit, you have to run the gauntlet of Facebook's messages claiming that you will "lose" all your "friends" if you go, and what will you do then...

      Not for me. I was born into a world that had no internet, and although it is now part of my headspace (FWIW), I am happy to keep real friends at the end of an email, phone call or a knock on the door.

    22. Re:Facebook is a good tool by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I have family on both coasts of the US. We are all tech savvy enough to where the family could have set up our own website with managed user accounts, photo and movie sharing, blogs, tweet interfaces, etc. After the hardwork of figuring and setting things up, However no one would want to admin the thing on top of raising children and our everyday lives. FB was far easier for everyone.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    23. Re:Facebook is a good tool by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, unless this comes from statistics Canada, how would we know the validity of the claim. who is doing the research and what means are they using to come up with this, are they going to every household and asking them "have you stopped using facebook this month?"

      I think it is more someone like M$ that is paying off some guy or company to write up these silly stories, and then trying to buy in on them at a lesser stock price...or trying to bring down their stock value...
      pathetic if you ask me...but i would believe it.

    24. Re:Facebook is a good tool by WebCrapper · · Score: 2

      I personally quit Facebook last month - put one last message up for about an hour "If you're important, you have my email address.... Ciao" - then I canceled the account.

      Now, I'm on Diaspora and am starting to convert others to it. Do I use Diaspora nearly as much? Nope - and I like it that way.

    25. Re:Facebook is a good tool by panikfan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, wonder if the recent outbreaks of hacking by lulzsec and others has anything to do with it. Probably not as most people are probably unaware, but it may explain a correlation if there is one. Oh, and I'm sure that FB would have no reason to claim these numbers are inaccurate. It's not like they're about to go public or anything...

    26. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Facebook is very useful for stuff like organizing a Family event.. Aunts, Uncles, Grand Parents, etc.

      I don't use FB, but my wife does.

    27. Re:Facebook is a good tool by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

      "if only someone would apply this type of random reward & leveling system to education, we could work wonders"

      Khan Academy does a pretty good job with this. And while cognitive fun is more about cognitive improvement than education, it's pretty addictive.

    28. Re:Facebook is a good tool by causality · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You actually captured it right there, the crux of the issue, the true appeal of Facebook:

      Facebook on the other hand lets you do that without getting too personal or intimate.

      Those things so many people are afraid of? Not because they are legitimately feared, but because most of them come from broken homes and a divorce culture and have some deep-seated trust issues and insecurities? Programming, in other words. You see this as a feature?

      We could collectively face our fears and learn how to interact with people on personal and intimate levels. What we'd discover is that dealing with others as actual human beings is far more satisfying, far less distant and hollow. Doing this requires being vulnerable and having good judgment, two things that scare so many.

      Or we can just make all human interaction as indirect and superficial as possible so nothing ever improves. What we'd discover is that we are so busy and have so much to keep up with yet actual acceptance and real understanding is so hard to find. Does that sound familiar? Doing this requires being shallow and mindlessly leaping on the current bandwagon because that's what everybody else is doing, nice and impersonal, focus on the crowd.

      You get to decide this on the individual level. So it's truly your call. Though, if people become any more alienated from one another, we may as well start addressing them with numbers instead of names. Who else can see this as a problem?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    29. Re:Facebook is a good tool by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Maybe...maybe not. But unless he told them upfront he was polygamous he has a LITTLE xplainin to do.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    30. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got sucked in during the early days when there wasn't really much to do other than play Mafia Wars

      You do realize that Facebook existed for over 4 years before Mafia Wars was created?

    31. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for nitpicking, but if you had Mafia Wars, it wasn't even remotely the "early days". Facebook launched in 2004, and until 2006 you had to have a .edu email address to register. Facebook apps like Mafia Wars didn't even exist until sometime around 2008.

    32. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other other hand, hanging on Facebook 24/7 and announcing every time you fart or move from one room to another or what you just ate... give it a rest, guys.

      They do that on Facebook too? I thought that was what twitter is for.

    33. Re:Facebook is a good tool by jdray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably a sign that Facebook is becoming mature, hitting their initial peak and losing a few users who didn't really understand it or need it in the first place. They'll probably lose quite a few users in the near future, settling back to a core set of users, though still over 100 million. If they provide useful functionality for people, they'll grow at a more reasonable rate and continue to mature. If they panic in the face of losing users and pull some BS maneuver and start blasting out spam, they'll die on the vine.

      Are there any studies around the rise and fall of AOL and MySpace? Some enterprising college student should put that together.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    34. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don’t friend them.

      You've never ran into the "friend of a friend guilt" trip, I see.

      I have many friends on Facebook from back when I was a punk kid. A good portion of them grew up into decent adults, but a proportion of them are developmentally atrophied at 16-21. I have no problem being friends with the ones that grew up, but try to avoid the other group like the plague. Sadly many of the latter group have finally discovered computers and smart phones.

      Now every time I go to a party or generally hang out with my old friends I get to spend an hour of people chastising me for not being friends with so-and-so (who happens to be in their mid-30s hanging out with 18 year old kids in back alleys doing drugs). I've had five people all gang up on me, trying to convince me of the merits of "friending" people who'd I rather never think of again. It gets worse when these people show up places, since then I have to listen to them guilt trip me as well.

      If often comes to the point where I might as well "friend" them, since it saves me hassle and stress in the long run. I suppose it doesn't matter, since I only actually check Facebook once a month or so (if even) when I have absolutely nothing better to do. Its not like my feed is full of any important information or communications to begin with, just minor burbles and desperate pleas for attention.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    35. Re:Facebook is a good tool by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does having wives in different countries qualify as Bigamy?

      No, its a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Wives or a RAIW. Some encourage RAIW-5 although I've heard RAIW-1 with two identical twins is pretty hot. As often said on /., you need to realize that RAIW is a high availability solution not a backup solution, they hate being told they are the backup device, they all want to think they're the primary.

      BTW if anyone out there can explain how to "underclock" my wife from "normal wife" to "inexpensive wife" let me know. I'm sure its all about soldering a jumper somewhere or uploading new BIOS firmware (Is this where the ethernet cable is inserted?)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    36. Re:Facebook is a good tool by spiralx · · Score: 1

      That's an awful long screed about the breakdown of human interaction because of Facebook, which ignores the fact that I (and everyone I know), use Facebook in addition to having real life personal and/or intimate relationships with their friends. Just because my closest friends post status updates doesn't mean I don't see them on a regular basis in real life.

      Facebook is a useful tool for keeping in touch and maintaining pre-existing social groups. If your view of social interaction is as bleak as your post suggests, then you won't get anything out of Facebook... but that's nothing to do with Facebook.

    37. Re:Facebook is a good tool by causality · · Score: 2

      Don’t friend them.

      You've never ran into the "friend of a friend guilt" trip, I see.

      I have many friends on Facebook from back when I was a punk kid. A good portion of them grew up into decent adults, but a proportion of them are developmentally atrophied at 16-21. I have no problem being friends with the ones that grew up, but try to avoid the other group like the plague. Sadly many of the latter group have finally discovered computers and smart phones.

      Now every time I go to a party or generally hang out with my old friends I get to spend an hour of people chastising me for not being friends with so-and-so (who happens to be in their mid-30s hanging out with 18 year old kids in back alleys doing drugs). I've had five people all gang up on me, trying to convince me of the merits of "friending" people who'd I rather never think of again. It gets worse when these people show up places, since then I have to listen to them guilt trip me as well.

      If often comes to the point where I might as well "friend" them, since it saves me hassle and stress in the long run. I suppose it doesn't matter, since I only actually check Facebook once a month or so (if even) when I have absolutely nothing better to do. Its not like my feed is full of any important information or communications to begin with, just minor burbles and desperate pleas for attention.

      If you're a pushover, the wrong kind of people will exploit that for their own selfish reasons. If you need to have the approval of people, the wrong kind of people will exploit that for their own selfish purposes.

      This is older than history. Facebook hasn't changed that. Facebook hasn't brought it about.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    38. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      The thing is, at least for a phone call or a knock on the door, the recipient is forced to acknowledge the messenger on the messenger's time, not their own. With facebook, e-mail, or post(snail-mail), they can toss aside the message until they feel a desire to catch up with the messenger. Also with facebook, and other social sites, the messenger only need to post the message once for a multitude of recipients with the advantage of not wasting bandwidth sending out multiple messages (one-to-many, as opposed to an e-mail's (one-to-one)^x).

    39. Re:Facebook is a good tool by causality · · Score: 1

      and all the righteous people disappeared

      You must admit, as a theory it does explain the world in which we live...

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    40. Re:Facebook is a good tool by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I use that as a measuring rod of who I should talk to in real life. If they are hounding me about my facebook page, then I probably don't need to be talking to them anyway. I have lost a few friends because of facebook and twitter, and I feel better off for it.

    41. Re:Facebook is a good tool by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why May? For many Canadians, summer unofficially starts on the May Two-Four* weekend. On that long weekend there is a mass migration to cottage country. Roads heading out of the cities are clogged with bumper to bumper traffic. Police are out in force keeping speeders and unsafe trailers off the road. Nobody has time for Facebook.

      Although the holiday is officially called Victoria Day, it is called the May two-four because it frequently lands on May 24, and because a case of beer is called a two-four (24 cans or bottles in a case).

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    42. Re:Facebook is a good tool by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      The same study suggests 1.5million Canadians also quit in a single month, that's 5% of Canada's entire population quitting Facebook in May. Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May? For this to be realistic there'd almost certainly have to have been some good reason why so many chose that specific month to all leave together but I'm not aware of any event that would've caused such a mass exodus.

      May is when it gets WARM up here. Hockey season is pretty much over and we only have four or five months of decent weather! Outdoors > Facebook

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    43. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word... I got sucked in during the early days when there wasn't really much to do other than play Mafia Wars (I blame my wife, it was one of the few games she's ever gotten into). Was primarily interested in figuring out the game mechanic, as well as marveling at their psychological hacking techniques (pure genius... if only someone would apply this type of random reward & leveling system to education, we could work wonders, or churn out our own suicide bombers, or at least do something amazing). Anyway, after playing through some of our cultural heritage "campaigns" (Moscow and Bangkok), got stuck on some glitch and took that opportunity to quit cold turkey and never looked back.

      But then a lot of my childhood friends started popping up, and now that a lot of these "too cool for facebook" people are finally leaving, it's actually becoming kind of nice again.

      If you think there was Mafia Wars in the "early days" of Facebook.... you clearly weren't sucked in then.

    44. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Now every time I go to a party or generally hang out with my old friends I get to spend an hour of people chastising me...
      I've had five people all gang up on me...
      It gets worse when these people show up places, since then I have to listen to them guilt trip me as well.

      You stand there for an *hour* "getting chastised"? By your *friends*? And you *have* to listen to them guilt trip you? That's virtually unbelievable.

      See, you're a grown-up now. You're not in front of the school principal. You don't have to take 2 minutes of this, let alone an hour.

      How about (polite) "I'm not 'friending' this person. I've stated my reasons. Please do not ask again"
      (less polite) "What part of 'no' don't you understand?"
      (finally) "Just fuck off with this shit will you" (leaves room).

      Or just be spineless for the rest of your life. It's up to you.

    45. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never blamed Facebook. It just makes it a bit harder to do what the previous poster said. Sometimes, if I had my druthers, I wouldn't even be on Facebook. Sadly I have a couple friends where pretty much the only way to communicate with them is with it. Its sad and amusing that there is a decent segment of the youngish (30 something) population who has completely failed to grasp email. I know many people who don't even have a personal email account, much less check it, and this MyFaceSpaceBook has become the de facto standard for quick communications (that and SMS).

      Social networks exist because of the exploitation of social leverage. I, personally, miss Livejournal, since it allowed me to type pretty much open letters to my friends. It allowed content. But as social networking evolves the emphasis is much less on content and on mere superficial ass sniffing. There isn't much of interest that can be said in a mere 250 (or 140) characters.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    46. Re:Facebook is a good tool by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Donâ(TM)t friend them.

      Uh. That sounds like a subpar nontech approach, assuming they are actually your friends but somehow annoying on facebook, you can filter them or their apps out while keeping them as friends. Facebook does give you many options of controlling what you see and what other people see.

      FWIW Facebook also provide you an option to download a whole lot of your information in a zip file. Which is handy sometimes but probably more as reminder that the FBI, CIA etc are likely to be able to get Facebook to make a similar zip file for them (and provide them with even more info- perhaps the IP address used to create the account etc).

      --
    47. Re:Facebook is a good tool by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Didn't even notice MySpace come and go. I might have had a Geocities site at some point, but it was just a mirror.

      I already had a web page with all my stuff on it, and most of my closer friends still hang out on IRC. So there wasn't really much point to Facebook until it hit critical mass among non-computer geeks.

    48. Re:Facebook is a good tool by spiralx · · Score: 1

      How is IRC even remotely comparable in function to Facebook? Yeah, if I wanted to chat to a random bunch of anonymous people about a particular topic I'd hang out on IRC, but that's nothing like what I use Facebook for.

    49. Re:Facebook is a good tool by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, people *dont* like that? That explains why no one ever emails me back when i send them links. That, and they are all locked into the facebook paradigm, i guess.

      Personally, i love email. I gives you so much more control, i constantly have Sylpheed open with five accounts streaming into it and an every 15 minute autocheck and make noise on delivery, setup. The application is only apparent when i know there is something there to check. It is really very efficient.

      But, i suppose its apples and oranges, to an extent. Whilst both email and facebook are both ostensibly about online communication, facebook is really more for hanging out and being part of a scene. Even if that does mean you are subjected to the torture of attention seekers, cheesy "i'm so unique/clever" comments, and a torrent of information regarding what your "friends" are putting on toast at any given moment.

      No thanks. I have made quite a home under this rock.

    50. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 1

      You stand there for an *hour* "getting chastised"?

      You can't *understand* "hyperbole"?

      I've tried some of your (oh so spineful) approaches, and generally its more trouble than its worth, since it always gets back to the person who you don't want to "friend", and then you get to listen to them whining, then you get to listen to everyone, next time you see them say "you made so and so upset".

      (finally) "Just fuck off with this shit will you" (leaves room).

      Oh yeah... alienating people over something as asinine as Facebook is so much better than the alternative.

      Or just be spineless for the rest of your life. It's up to you.

      Better spineless than an ass.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    51. Re:Facebook is a good tool by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly and plausibly reasoned.

    52. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early days? Mafia Wars? Applications came late in the game and facebook has sucked more and more ever since.

      I still wish there was a way to hide all the crap from applications. I've turned off Facebook Platform, but I still have to manually block every application that shows up in a friend's feed.

    53. Re:Facebook is a good tool by causality · · Score: 1

      That's an awful long screed about the breakdown of human interaction because of Facebook

      3-4 short paragraphs is awfully long? Heh. Not much of a reader, then?

      And it's not because of Facebook. Facebook is supplying what a market is demanding. I refer to the origin of that demand. In that sense you are right, it's nothing to do (directly) with Facebook. Facebook is the effect of a cause. It is not the cause. I'm not sure how you could have interpreted me in any other way, since all the other ways to interpret me are trivially shown to be invalid (course, instead of assuming I am a thinking being, you might need me to be wrong...).

      Facebook is a useful tool for keeping in touch and maintaining pre-existing social groups. If your view of social interaction is as bleak as your post suggests, then you won't get anything out of Facebook... but that's nothing to do with Facebook.

      In my case, I already have real human interaction with my friends and relatives. Actual face-to-face quality time.

      The only use I'd have for Facebook would be to have superficial contact with people I don't spend actual quality time with. I don't find that desirable in the slightest. It would be like taking one of the finer things in life, making a standardized package for it, and trivializing the hell out of it. But then, I'm not really a member of this culture; I just happen to be in it. I have long overcome its fears of actual contact by realizing they are not in my interests.

      If you really cannot understand the psychological impact a culture of divorce and bastard children and media manipulation and alienation has had on the last few generations, the way they have few or no models for healthy relationships and how this is spilling over even into friendships and business relationships, how being superficial is now considered cool, and why that might create an environment conducive to things like Facebook, just tell me you don't know what I am talking about and leave it at that.

      It is, after all, hard to have a discussion about electrons with people who strongly believe electrons don't exist because they have never seen them.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    54. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If often comes to the point where I might as well "friend" them, since it saves me hassle and stress in the long run.

      "Friend", followed by "Hide all by [...]", is what you're looking for.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    55. Re:Facebook is a good tool by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends. Most countries don't accept marriages performed in all other countries as valid, only ones with similar laws (US law is weird and convoluted in this respect). If both marriages were conducted in locales that don't regard the other as valid, then it would only count as infidelity, unless he travelled to a third jurisdiction that treated both as valid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now every time I go to a party or generally hang out with my old friends I get to spend an hour of people chastising me for not being friends with so-and-so ...

      They don't really sound like friends either then. I'd de-friend them as well.

    57. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      If they are not worth calling, they are not worth contacting on Facebook.
      If it is not worth Emailing, It is not worth posting of Facebook.
      If they are not your friend then they are not you friend.

      The fact that Facebook makes you "Feel" as if you are more connected to more people is its addictive property.
      Lose Facebook and you have lost in reality nothing. If you like it more power to you, have fun.

      Though it really is not a tool. Tools are used for doing useful work. Facebook is a cross between a game and jerking yourself off.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    58. Re:Facebook is a good tool by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Facebook utterly sucks compared to a year ago.. It's fricking turning into MySpace.

      Services like this often devolve, eventually catering to the lowest common denominator of popularity and maximum profit for quantity over quality services rests at the center of the bell curve.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    59. Re:Facebook is a good tool by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... alienating people over something as asinine as Facebook is so much better than the alternative.

      A is friend of B, B is friend of C, so A and C must be friends, too, lest A cannot be friends with B? And all can be alienated by that?

      This is only true for "brothers", not "friends". Ask any Marine. They've got some hundred thousands of brothers. Ask if they everyone of them is their friend.

      Better spineless than an ass.

      You could not be any more wrong than that.

      Asses sometimes succeed. Spineless people never do.

    60. Re:Facebook is a good tool by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      So, since you don't have the gumption to say "I don't use Facebook", you blame your friends for guilt tripping you? The problem isn't Facebook or your friends mate.

    61. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Pope · · Score: 1

      Remind me to go around posting in every Linux thread how much I don't use it.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    62. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Pope · · Score: 1

      The same study suggests 1.5million Canadians also quit in a single month, that's 5% of Canada's entire population quitting Facebook in May. Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May?

      1) University generally ends at the end of April/first week in May. Students getting summer jobs? 2) Hockey playoffs! :) Either case, they'll be back in September.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    63. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm not going to text 20 people to ask if they want to have a meeting tomorrow, and have them all text their friends to invite them too. And wait for texts back from everyone to make sure the date/time work. And text them all again when it doesn't. I can't afford that shit, I have 250 texts a month. A single Facebook 'event', done through texts, would instantly result in overage fees. Besides, the majority of the people I invite to things on Facebook I have no other way of contacting. Don't have their phone number, don't have their email. Facebook makes it easy -- all you need is a name. Hell, half the time you don't even need that. And when I have more than 160 characters worth of invite, what am I supposed to do? Send six texts out to everyone? Call them all individually? Email is the only thing that would work, but few people check their email as often as they check Facebook, and as I said, I don't have everyone's email. I'm sure it's different if you're older -- I'm currently in college -- but I don't know a single person who talks to their friends via Email. First you get the Facebook page, then maybe if you're pretty good friends you'll get the phone number, and if you work together frequently you'll start using email.

      I agree that Facebook is a fad that will probably fade, but _something_ is going to have to replace it. And I can't think of anything that could do the job other than another social networking site. It's nice to know when people are out of town, for example, but I can't expect they'll call/text/email everyone they know every time they go somewhere. It's nice to be able to plan events on a couple hours notice even and still be able to get everyone you want invited and attending. Something like an extended Google Calendar could possibly replace that, but it's not a great option. It's nice to be able to post news and commentary and such -- I suppose I could make a blog, but I can't expect anywhere near the amount of readers that I currently get on Facebook. Sure, it's not the ideal vehicle for most of these things, but it's a hell of a lot better than the existing alternatives.

      TL;DR:
      The thing about Facebook, I think, is it's not really about communicating with _people_, it's about staying in touch with entire _communities_. There's no single physical place where everyone tends to hang out, and there's no other single way to get in touch with everyone. As soon as we have a better communication medium that revolves around _groups_ rather than _individuals_, it may be able to replace Facebook. Google Wave, I think, was a step in the right direction, but was lacking focus and a good UI.

    64. Re:Facebook is a good tool by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Bigamy? No! itsa a big a you!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    65. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can set certain people's updates to not show in your feed. That's what I do when someone is friended because they're a relative or whatever, but post annoying things.

      Alternately, I've got my default posting status to not be shown to certain people who always leave idiotic responses. From their perspective, I just post very, very little (it's not often I post to begin with anyway).

    66. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, these numbers come from FadBooks own advertising tool and now they're scrambling to say they aren't accurate. I manage several networks and in the last 6 months have seen a major decrease in the number of people logging onto FadBook. As someone who has been working the web since the early 90s I can tell you this is just the cycle social sites go in. Might be hard for all you newbies to realize but FadBook wasn't the first 'social' platform, it's just the latest in a long line of time wasters.

    67. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound like a chubby chaser.

    68. Re:Facebook is a good tool by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      And adding them to the "Limited profile" group, and setting your privacy settings so that the default privacy setting for everything you post is "Friends, Except: Limited profile". Actually, I generally wouldn't care all that much about seeing what they post... unless they post updates annoyingly often, I wouldn't bother to hide them from the news feed.

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
    69. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You've never ran into the "friend of a friend guilt" trip, I see.

      Actually, its more like we're not all push overs and followers with no ability to think for ourselves.

      You sir, are a follower. I'd also be willing to bet you care about how many facebook friends you have, to show your social status as having a bunch of friends.

      Is it really hard to say 'I don't friend everyone and I'm not friending you because you're fucking annoying me about friending you'.

      Do you depend so much on everyone else liking you that you are unable to like yourself and care about what YOU like?

      If you have a problem with 'friending peer pressure' you really need to get some counselling. I'm dead serious, not trying to be an insulting ass like the rest of my post. If it bothers you that much, you need medication. You don't actually need other peoples approval to be happy in life, stop being so concerned with it and facebook will be far less of a problem for you.

      Of course, the sad thing is, Facebook is a product of the problem not the actual problem itself. People such as yourself with low self esteem and the need to please others in order to feel value and self worth. You need to learn to live without depending on others for approval and how to like/love yourself before you start worrying about your social network. Once you fix your own issues, your social issues will fall by the wayside as you realize your friends are more like leeches taking advantage of the fact that your self confidence issues make you think you aren't worthwhile without being able to show all your Facebook friends.

      Let me give you a hint. No one, anywhere in the world has more than 10 friends (less than that really). You may have a bunch of people you like and hang out with once and a while see occasionally (or regularly like coworkers) that you wouldn't have a problem being friends with, but they are just acquaintances. For instance, when you go to a party, most of those people aren't your friends, so when they say why don't you friend me you say 'because we're aquantences, not friends, the only time I see you is at parties'

      Its really not hard. You just needs some self-confidence/balls and a self-esteem boost.

      The good news for you is, EVERYONE else on facebook is JUST as fucked up as you. They all have low self-esteem and self-confidence problems (regular users, not just random people who create an account and never look again) ... so you're in good company. Well, okay, not everyone, the other group on Facebook is the group of scammers and manipulators taking advantage of people like yourself.

      Back to my original statement, get counseling.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    70. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Sadly I have a couple friends where pretty much the only way to communicate with them is with it

      Wrong. They aren't your friends. If they were, they'd communicate with you. If they don't have the time to write a letter to you (or an email) directly, they aren't your friends. You simply aren't that important to them (compared to whatever/wherever they are now). Maybe in the future, you'll be friends again, but right now, you're old acquaintances.

      No young person 'fails' to grasp email, its just that you aren't important enough for them to email. If you happen to be handy and extremely easy to send a one line message too ... well then they'll send you a random thought when they notice you on facebook. Thats not communication. Thats not friendship. Thats not socializing.

      If you weren't so dependent on approval from others, you wouldn't use Facebook now.

      You have low self-esteem, so you've lowered your standards to the point that if someone sends you a random thought on facebook you think of them as a friend. This indicates that your ACTUAL problem is you have no friends and you need to stop fucking around on facebook and get out and meet some people in the real world.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    71. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I have lost a few friends because of facebook and twitter

      They weren't your friends.

      Actually, its unlikely you know what a friend ACTUALLY is.

      People on facebook call acquaintances 'friends'. Just because you know someone and you've had a conversation with them once or twice and you happen to share something in common ... that doesn't make you friends.

      People only have a small group of friends, less than 10 in real life, generally less than 5 if you exclude family members. If you think you have more, its extremely unlikely you know the difference between a friend and an acquaintance.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    72. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... alienating people over something as asinine as Facebook is so much better than the alternative.

      Yet you let people do it to you all the time, that is in fact your exact complaint about these people are parties.

      You don't know what a friend is, these people are not your friends if they're bugging you about being friended.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    73. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So basically, you think its socially acceptable to do on facebook what you wouldn't consider doing anywhere else.

      Did you ever for a second question WHY you act differently ...

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    74. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If someone doesn't have 'the time to deal with you', they aren't your friend, problem solved.

      If you didn't have a self esteem/confidence problem, you wouldn't be concerned with trying to call people who don't have the time for you friends.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    75. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Though it really is not a tool. Tools are used for doing useful work. Facebook is a cross between a game and jerking yourself off.

      I disagree, I've found both gaming and jerking off to be more useful and enjoyable than facebook, and I mean like jerking off with toothpaste as a lubricant and playing ET on the Atari 2600 are more enjoyable than Facebook in some not so insignificant ways.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    76. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May

      Cause its warm and they can just go outside and see their actual friends in real life since the weather is considerably nicer than just a few months ago?

      Of course, that very same pattern is seen in almost every business, hence why some businesses have busy seasons in the summer, and some have busy winter seasons.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    77. Re:Facebook is a good tool by spiralx · · Score: 1

      3-4 short paragraphs is awfully long? Heh. Not much of a reader, then?

      Straight in with the ad hominem, nice.

      And it's not because of Facebook. Facebook is supplying what a market is demanding. I refer to the origin of that demand. In that sense you are right, it's nothing to do (directly) with Facebook. Facebook is the effect of a cause. It is not the cause. I'm not sure how you could have interpreted me in any other way, since all the other ways to interpret me are trivially shown to be invalid (course, instead of assuming I am a thinking being, you might need me to be wrong...).

      You're correct I got the cause and effect relationship in your post the wrong way round, but that doesn't invalidate my argument at all. Facebook is an enabling tool for social interaction, the latest in a history of technological advances that facilitate such - the postal service, the telegraph, the phone, the mobile phone, email, IM, forums etc.

      In my case, I already have real human interaction with my friends and relatives. Actual face-to-face quality time.

      The only use I'd have for Facebook would be to have superficial contact with people I don't spend actual quality time with. I don't find that desirable in the slightest. It would be like taking one of the finer things in life, making a standardized package for it, and trivializing the hell out of it. But then, I'm not really a member of this culture; I just happen to be in it. I have long overcome its fears of actual contact by realizing they are not in my interests.

      Good for you. How many people do you interact with on a regular basis, and how geographically dispersed are they? Do you have multiple social groups you are part of, with different interests and demographics?

      You're supposed to be able to maintain a social group of no more than 150 or so people, but unless they're all doing pretty much the same thing all the time it's nigh-on impossible to be constantly up to date with everyone's news and doings. Facebook facilitates this in a way no other individual tool manages - status updates, photos, simple event management etc., all pervasively interactive. It's nice to be able to keep in touch with friends who live far enough away I don't see very often, or who are travelling, and to get informed of all kinds of events I might fancy. And best of all, what I choose to see is what I want to see.

      If you really cannot understand the psychological impact a culture of divorce and bastard children and media manipulation and alienation has had on the last few generations, the way they have few or no models for healthy relationships and how this is spilling over even into friendships and business relationships, how being superficial is now considered cool, and why that might create an environment conducive to things like Facebook, just tell me you don't know what I am talking about and leave it at that.

      It is, after all, hard to have a discussion about electrons with people who strongly believe electrons don't exist because they have never seen them.

      *shrug* Your experience with society/Facebook seems to have coloured your ability to realise that other people have different social lives and use Facebook in different ways. I have an abundence of wonderful friends I've known for years, Facebook is a handy tool that allows my immediate social circle to be larger than it would be.

    78. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are doing it wrong, that's not where the Ethernet cable goes.
      (as for the jumpers, I've hand tuned them for performance, might increase consumption - sorry about that)

    79. Re:Facebook is a good tool by bjk002 · · Score: 1

      OP said "real friends". Real friends don't operate the way you describe. They look forward to any opportune moments to interact with their "real friends".

      --
      Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
    80. Re:Facebook is a good tool by slackzilly · · Score: 1

      I don't think I know anyone that deserves to be rapturized (new cool word)

      Never heard of any either

      Except me of course :)

      --
      - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
    81. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my sister, daughters, ex-wife, mother, nephews, niece, and even my mom all do, too. My 80 year old dad doesn't, he doesn't even own a computer.

    82. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you really sound like a drag to hang out with. I bet there is something "atrophied" about you!

    83. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 1

      This is only true for "brothers", not "friends". Ask any Marine. They've got some hundred thousands of brothers. Ask if they everyone of them is their friend

      You don't really have friends like mine then. I lived in a poor neighborhood, and many of us were homeless, addicts, criminals, or all of the above. It creates quite a bond, it seems.

      Also its more like "A is friend of B, X, Y, and Z, A used to be friend of C, C is friend of B and X, Y, and Z; therefore A must still be friend of C."

      Asses sometimes succeed. Spineless people never do.

      Judging from your earlier tone, my must be very successful. I kid!

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    84. Re:Facebook is a good tool by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If you have a friend that plays every new game to come along, block them. I don't have any that do.

    85. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm not going to text 20 people to ask if they want to have a meeting tomorrow

      That's what email is for.

      Besides, the majority of the people I invite to things on Facebook I have no other way of contacting. Don't have their phone number, don't have their email

      Personally, if I don't know them well enough to have their phone number or email address, I can't see any reason why I'd want to contact them.

      I'm sure it's different if you're older -- I'm currently in college

      My daughter's your age, and she checks her email. In fact, her phone beeps when an email comes in. My phone beeps when I get an email, too, and I'm using Yahoo webmail for my email. I can check it on my computer, or access it on my phone when I'm not near a computer.

      few people check their email as often as they check Facebook

      Sorry, but that really sounds stupid to me. Everybody with an internet connection has email, not everybody (contrary to popular oppinion) has a facebook account. There's no possible way to contact me on facebook.

      In five years they'll all move on to the next big thing and leave facebook behind, just like they did with... um, I can't remember the name of the last big social networking site, all my musician friends used to use it, as did I. Nobody's on it today, which is why I'm taking a pass on facebook.

    86. Re:Facebook is a good tool by rthille · · Score: 4, Informative

      RAIW does not exist, as there is no such thing as an inexpensive wife.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    87. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has smartphones with data packages. Nearly everyone (especially students) has many email accounts, most people will contact you from both, but only actually check one regularly. So you never know where to send it. Everyone's email inbox is deluged with various messages, it's easy for one to get lost. Facebook limits this by keeping different kind of communication in different areas. You may have signed up for 5000 spam pages that keep throwing junk statuses into your feed, but if I send you an event invite, you'll still see it immediately. I can't tell you how many times it's taken a week or more to get a response to an email. If it's time-sensitive, I avoid email at all costs. But as I said, I can't text everyone, and certainly can't call everyone individually.

      So you can't be contacted on Facebook. OK...but for the people who can, it makes things a lot easier. I only know one person who can't be contacted on Facebook. My only way to get in touch with her is email, and it usually doesn't work out that well.

      And maybe you swap phone numbers with everyone you meet, but most people I know tend not to. Hell, I didn't even have phone numbers for most of my _roommates_.

      But the big thing for me with Facebook is it's utility for activism. I have seen several cases where hundreds of students were brought out to events planned a mere two days in advance. You can't get that kind of reaction time with email. Sure, every group has their massive mailing lists, but you've gotta first email all the group leaders, hope they're actually still the leader, hope they still care, hope they check their email regularly...and then you have to hope the same things from the members. I know for a fact that many members of these groups use an email address that they check at most once a day for those lists. You could never get an event like that organized so rapidly with email. Facebook makes it very easy to contact large groups, because it's designed for large groups. It's more of a distributed model, at least for getting messages around. Email is designed to have one person sending a message.

      I can't imagine trying to coordinate a large event in a distributed manner through something like email. What, you send it to all your friends, and ask that they send it to all their friends, like a chain letter? By the time you're done, half the people have marked it as spam, the rest have a few hundred messages sitting in their inbox.....

    88. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 1

      How do I say "I don't use Facebook" when half my friends are "friends" on Facebook?

      And once again, I never blamed Facebook, though "social leverage" (which was, in part, my point) is its key to success. If everyone you know is on Facebook, it gets harder not to use Facebook. The same happened when I was in college with Microsoft's IM client, if I wanted to talk to anyone I met via IM, I had to have an MSN account, regardless of what protocol I used previously.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    89. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Yet you let people do it to you all the time, that is in fact your exact complaint about these people are parties.

      I do? Man, I never realized that people on Slashdot knew me so well! If your going to live under my sofa, you should come out from time to time for a beer.

      You don't know what a friend is, these people are not your friends if they're bugging you about being friended.

      The people I am friends with are "friends". The people I'm not friends with aren't. Its just the people I'm friends with are still very, very, close to the people who aren't. Most of the time their actually trying to be good friends "I notice your not friends with so-and-so, here is his name! Oh, and I gave him your cell phone number, he hasn't seen you in years, it will be neat!". Occasionally this is very nice, since are people out there I've lost touch with unwillingly. Occasionally I lost touch with people because I'm scared they'll steal my stereo, or smoke crack in my bathroom.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    90. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 0

      Yep, I don't like people in their mid-30's who smoke meth and hang out with 17 year olds... If your that type of person, well I'm probably a drag. You probably wouldn't enjoy my company! For your benefit, I would be you MyFaceSpaceBook "friend"!

      You can thank me.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    91. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an awful long screed about the breakdown of human interaction because of Facebook, which ignores the fact that I (and everyone I know), use Facebook in addition to having real life personal and/or intimate relationships with their friends. Just because my closest friends post status updates doesn't mean I don't see them on a regular basis in real life.

      Facebook is a useful tool for keeping in touch and maintaining pre-existing social groups. If your view of social interaction is as bleak as your post suggests, then you won't get anything out of Facebook... but that's nothing to do with Facebook.

      Not much for reading comprehension, eh? GP is not blaming facebook for all this. He is simply pointing out that the appeal of facebook is based on the kind of culture we already have.

    92. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Omestes · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a follower. I'd also be willing to bet you care about how many facebook friends you have, to show your social status as having a bunch of friends.

      Yep, I must be concerned with how many Facebook "friends" I have because I don't want to add friends to Facebook.

      Its not like I said "I suppose it doesn't matter, since I only actually check Facebook once a month or so (if even) when I have absolutely nothing better to do. Its not like my feed is full of any important information or communications to begin with, just minor burbles and desperate pleas for attention.", or anything.

      Is it really hard to say 'I don't friend everyone and I'm not friending you because you're fucking annoying me about friending you'.

      Notice I didn't say that the people I don't want to be friends with are harassing me. I suppose not. But lets say it again then; "the people who I don't want to friend aren't the ones harassing me". Its the generally well meaning people I'm actually real life friends with. Generally its because they really think I want to know so-and-so, and somehow missed them. With most people, in polite society, you can't insult their friends, so its hard to say "Nope, they are a moron who smokes meth in alleys", or even the milder "no, I don't consider so-and-so worth the extra six seconds it would take to click a button". I do have a very hard time just being a dick. But then again I wasn't raised in such a way as to glorify being a self-centered, antisocial, asshole.

      If you have a problem with 'friending peer pressure' you really need to get some counselling. I'm dead serious, not trying to be an insulting ass like the rest of my post. If it bothers you that much, you need medication. You don't actually need other peoples approval to be happy in life, stop being so concerned with it and facebook will be far less of a problem for you.

      Oh my God, you are so correct. I do! My largest problem is "friending peer pressure", there must be something terribly wrong with me! Actually if that's the worst of my problems I pretty damn happy. Did I ever say I lost sleep over it? Does it traumatize me? Does it cause me any pain outside of mild discomfort at social gatherings? Nope. That whole anecdote was more to illustrate a point than to show any deep concern over the issue.

      I more posted that to point out social leverage. Thats how Facebook survives and strives. The more people you know on it, the more pressure there is to join it.

      People such as yourself with low self esteem and the need to please others in order to feel value and self worth.

      Your Psych101 wisdom astounds me. You must be a comptient psychologist, being able to glean my full personality from a quick, largely content-less, Slashdot post. I appreciate your concern though, but perhaps you should go aim your deep psychological insights at a more worthy subject.

      You don't actually need other peoples approval to be happy in life, stop being so concerned with it and facebook will be far less of a problem for you.

      I don't, and don't think I do. Thank you.

      Let me give you a hint. No one, anywhere in the world has more than 10 friends (less than that really)

      My grandfather used to say that too. And he's correct. Sadly I never really had pretenses of having many more, an observant individual, such as yourself, would have noticed how I used quotes around the term "friend" in the context of Facebook. Just to be clear, my friend's (lack of quotes) cat is my "friend" (quotes) on Facebook. Am I deeply invested in being real life, take-a-bullet-for, friends with my friend's cat?

      Part of the problem, I suppose, is that these social networks use the word "friends", and not "acquainted" or "mildly amusing compatriot", or "coworker". Actually we need a better word to divide the friends from the

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    93. Re:Facebook is a good tool by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      How do I say "I don't use Facebook" when half my friends are "friends" on Facebook?

      That's your problem - to own up to lying to your friends.

    94. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      OP said "real friends". Real friends don't operate the way you describe. They look forward to any opportune moments to interact with their "real friends".

      Real friends don't let friends join Facebook.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    95. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAIW does not exist, as there is no such thing as an inexpensive wife.

      Have you tried mail-order? I hear outsourcing is quite cheap.

    96. Re:Facebook is a good tool by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I bet there are a few people on this site who would love to hang out and do drugs with some 17 year olds.

    97. Re:Facebook is a good tool by treeves · · Score: 1

      Sticker price is not total-cost-of-ownership. Big difference.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    98. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Snwbeast · · Score: 1

      FBPurity. Cleans all the crap out so you can just see newsfeeds. Essential for the rare time I spend on Facebook.

    99. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in contrast I don't personally know anyone that's quit. Personal anecdotes are even more meaningless than a study that doesn't explain it's methods.

    100. Re:Facebook is a good tool by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I disagree, your assessment is too broad. I have 23 Facebook friends. (yes, i didn't miss off a digit ~= two dozen). They're all people I know well in real life, some I've known for over two decades. Most live over 150 miles from me. It's great to be able to share holiday, kids and drunken photos, share music/videos/links and generally chat - as well as snoop on or interrupt other people's conversations (with a witty remark!) just like you could if you were all sat in a room actually talking. None of this takes place over email (though it used to > 5 years ago). Facebook is a lot better than email at making you feel "in touch" with people you love and don't get to see as often as you'd like.

      Oh, and the only person who's hassled me to Friend them is my brother's Fiancée. I said "no" straight up, made a joke out of it (she's also friends with my ex), and that was that. We send direct messages occasionally in a way that emulates email/chat.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    101. Re:Facebook is a good tool by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Not to take away from the funniness of this post...

      The I in RAID stands for Independent, not Inexpensive.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    102. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Nearly everyone (especially students) has many email accounts

      This I don't understand. I only have three -- my personal email account, a throw-away account for crap like registering for web pages, and a work email account. I check the work email at work (in fact keep the client open all day), check the personal account before I go to work in the morning, and don't check the spam account at all.

      The activism angle I can see, that does sound useful if you're into that sort of thing (which I was when I was in college). But... do you keep Facebook open 24/7?

    103. Re:Facebook is a good tool by vlm · · Score: 1

      We are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do.

      I had to LOL at that. Sounds good when you're talking to the average fundie, but replying to my post means you believe in "negative one"? LOL

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    104. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering if the lost users were minors who close their account regularly so that others don't see what they are doing until they want them to. It's a CNN story so take it with a grain of salt. American media love to build someone or something up and them delight in tearing it down. Obama being the exception.

    105. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Yea, most people have personal and school email accounts....they treat the school one similar to how you treat your work email I guess; they check it maybe once or twice a day. But that's what's easiest to find, and that's frequently what most people give you. Especially with the campus activism stuff, everyone seems to want to keep their campus life with their campus email -- myself included -- but then they rarely check their campus email. Hell, even I don't check it that often -- I have it all going to my gmail, but gmail only loads new messages every hour.

      But... do you keep Facebook open 24/7?

      Yes. I have a couple tabs that I never close: my Google homepage, two tabs of Facebook (my feed and one of my group's pages), Google Webmaster tools, and Google voice (my main way of texting)

    106. Re:Facebook is a good tool by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      Too bad swapping out the old/dying ones is so expensive. And they don't work together well. In fact, it would be best if they didn't know each other even existed.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    107. Re:Facebook is a good tool by treeves · · Score: 1

      That was an insult, but it was not an ad hominem. It wasn't part of his argument. It was just there. Unnecessarily.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    108. Re:Facebook is a good tool by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You young guys are lucky. But the young guys when you're a geezer will be even luckier, we can't imagine the innovations that will come about in the next 30-40 years. Nobody could have forseen the internet, email, or cell phones, let alone variable focus eye implants, hip and knee implants, cochlear implants, and the other medical advances. All we had was landline phones and snail mail. God but it was primitive. In forty years you'll look back and say "god but it was primitive when I was in college."

    109. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Meski · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you don't want to spend time listening to drivel - you would avoid the drivelers - not cut off your ears (well, I hope not).

      Vincent Van Gogh had problems with FaceBook too?

    110. Re:Facebook is a good tool by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Or perhaps it is people realizing that Facebook actually sucks badly.

      It is/was a fad, just something that people had to do because "everyone else is doing it". It's sorta like Cabbage Patch dolls.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. I'm sick of it ... by amalek · · Score: 1

    Seems to be chock full of stalkers, spammers and generally maladjusted people talking to themselves via status updates. The only use I have for it now is keeping in touch with *old* friends and retrieving news feeds from various sites & services. Facesuck.

    1. Re:I'm sick of it ... by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems to be chock full of stalkers, spammers and generally maladjusted people talking to themselves via status updates

      Why are these people in your friends list in the first place? The whole internet is full of stalkers, spammers and generally maladjusted people. The point of Facebook (or any other messenger service) is that you only white-list those you want to associate with.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:I'm sick of it ... by amalek · · Score: 2

      You know what, you're damn right. I am associating with some very strange people.

    3. Re:I'm sick of it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get out of it what you put into it. That's the way it is with most things in life.

    4. Re:I'm sick of it ... by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      While we're at it... I hate LinkedIn too.

    5. Re:I'm sick of it ... by vlm · · Score: 1

      Seems to be chock full of stalkers, spammers and generally maladjusted people talking to themselves via status updates

      Why are these people in your friends list in the first place? The whole internet is full of stalkers, spammers and generally maladjusted people. The point of Facebook (or any other messenger service) is that you only white-list those you want to associate with.

      They're the only ones left using it. If all the normal people drop it, or never use it, the only posts left are the weirdos.

      I left more than a year ago when I realized I hadn't posted anything I wanted public in over a month, and my news feed was almost entirely cut and pasted politician talking points (mostly right wing neo-con) and single and/or unemployed guys trolling for the obvious, and some games / apps that I hadn't gotten around to blocking yet. How incredibly boring and non-useful.

      My friends-list was mostly normal except for a couple weirdos. My news or posts or wall or whatever they call it, on the other hand, was almost 100% posts from the lunatics.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:I'm sick of it ... by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Again though, that's because you've got those people in your friends list, or you've liked their pages. It's not Facebook's fault if a) you've kept these people and b) your friends don't post much.

    7. Re:I'm sick of it ... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      How about they're family members and are mortally hurt if you don't friend them? Or your other relatives are. You can always block their status updates if you want. I don't think it tells them. At least nobody has asked me why I blocked their updates.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:I'm sick of it ... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yes, you just answered your own question :p

      I've blocked several people's updates. Mostly from the people that always post up bible quotes.

      My brother isn't quite so subtle, but still subtle-ish - he accepted friend requests from my mother and sisters, then deleted them shortly after :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:I'm sick of it ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      How about they're family members and are mortally hurt if you don't friend them?

      Well, if they were mortally hurt, then now they are dead and its no longer an issue.

      But ... since you were probably exaggerating then the proper response is to encourage them to seek counselling, they have self-worth issues.

      If someone is hurt because you won't 'friend them on facebook' they have issues way deeper than you can solve by friending them.

      Blocking status updates is for people without a backbone. Be honest, you'll get a lot more respect from people. You might think they never will find out, but the reality of it is they already know, you've probably told them about doing that themselves, which already showed them you don't have the courage or respect for them to be honest about it. Instead you'd rather lie because its easier on you.

      Grow a spine, and stop being so two-faced and untrustable. Respect is far more powerful than your facebook friends list, especially when all of them know better than to trust anything you say because you're probably just saying it to their face and doing/saying something entirely different behind their back.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  3. there should be a new Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    1. Re:there should be a new Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm one of the few people I know who has never had a Facebook account.

    2. Re:there should be a new Onion article by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2

      Yes just one of the small $6.5 Billion people who aren't on Facebook. Quite the minority you are.

    3. Re:there should be a new Onion article by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's me! :P

    4. Re:there should be a new Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, i love how using billion invokes people using the $ sign just by default now.

    5. Re:there should be a new Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes just one of the small $6.5 Billion people who aren't on Facebook.

      Wow. I'm not on Facebook, but I only figure I'm worth a few hundred thousand dollars, tops.

    6. Re:there should be a new Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your sentence is so poorly constructed that it lacks meaning. even google translate can do better than that

    7. Re:there should be a new Onion article by rwven · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's like a dollar a person!

    8. Re:there should be a new Onion article by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Sorry that you're 3rd grade reading level failed you. I think in 4th grade they teach you how to use capital letters to start your sentence, too. Perhaps that would help you.

  4. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kip Krieger, a college student from Virginia, says Facebook has become predictable.

    Most people are just like you. Boring.

  5. Facebook + $ by geoffrobinson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Facebook is going to make money by exploiting and mining the data they have (and ads). Losing some customers is to be expected. The interesting thing is that they reached a saturation point already.

    But it doesn't seem like these folks are going to go to another social networking site.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Facebook + $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the value of unemployed people and homemakers sitting in front of their FB account all day? A number of which with multiple accounts to aid their "gaming" network numbers for crud like fartville and nafiawars.

    2. Re:Facebook + $ by jra · · Score: 1

      Why is it "interesting" that they achieved saturation with *3/4 of the adult humans in the US*?

      That's a pretty damned impressive number...

    3. Re:Facebook + $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point, Blockbuster had similar numbers. Now look at them.

    4. Re:Facebook + $ by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Well I imagine they get ad revenue from the banner ads plastered on the fartville and nafiawars game pages (they probably get paid whether you are using adblock or not). And Zynga sells prepaid game cards to buy items in the games. Don't know if FB gets a slice of that or not.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Facebook + $ by vlm · · Score: 2

      At one point, Blockbuster had similar numbers. Now look at them.

      And Government Motors. And Standard Oil. And the local manufacturers of pretty much everything sold in a Walmart (now made in China)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Facebook + $ by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      I have 3 kids 3 and a half and younger. I'm not sure you want to tell an actual homemaker that they sit around all day in front of Facebook.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    7. Re:Facebook + $ by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      They are going to have some fun monetizing accounts from European users, due to stronger privacy laws.

    8. Re:Facebook + $ by spiralx · · Score: 1

      None of which network effects apply to.

  6. Well, there goes my damn corn crop by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, having a "life" is all well and good for my friends. But have they paused for even a moment and thought about what will become of my farm?!?!?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well, there goes my damn corn crop by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      LOL!

    2. Re:Well, there goes my damn corn crop by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "But have they paused for even a moment and thought about what will become of my farm?!?!?"

      a wasteland of lost productivity?

      Oh wait....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Well, there goes my damn corn crop by c0nner · · Score: 2

      There will be huge foreclosures on farms across the interwebs as the economy falls and owners walk away from the facebook. The short sales will be huge and the united bank of Zynga will implode from all the lost money. We will see the CEO go to congress to get a bailout because how were they to know that people would want privacy and wouldn't be willing to pay for fake goods indefinitely. Think of the children who will never know the joy of sitting around waiting for the chance to harvest their carrots. We have to keep things going and with this bailout money we will ensure that pixels are available for everyone and we will get people back into wasting their time on farming fake goods.

      Really think of the children and all those unfarmed bits.

  7. In Before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In before the horde of "I'm not Facebook" posts.

  8. Facebook's lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook only got what it deserved !

    1. Re:Facebook's lame by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Lots of money and lots of data to further sell to marketing firms?

  9. I left Facebook... by gQuigs · · Score: 4, Informative

    And I have not looked back... For me, I got tired of changing my privacy options all the time to keep what I wanted private, private. They kept changing them so that I would have to reconfigure things, for the same level of privacy.

    My blog on how to leave Facebook and keep some of the interesting information: bryanquigley.com/uncategorized/leaving-facebook

    1. Re:I left Facebook... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I don't change my setting that much. But I also have no information on facebook. No pictures at all, no checkins aloud, no constant updates. Do what they want with security, I got nothing there. Best security, is not to trust someone else's.

    2. Re:I left Facebook... by jkmartin · · Score: 2

      You never really leave Facebook. I thought I had deleted my account but signed back in a month later and it was still there. All my friends still present. Even the pictures and comments I had deleted individually were still there.

    3. Re:I left Facebook... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      You forgot to delete your cache.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:I left Facebook... by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

      Why not just not put that info up there in the first place? The only info I put on my facebook profile (or anywhere online, really) is info that I don't mind being public. I'd prefer that some of it stay private (email address for instance), but nothing in my profile is truly sensitive. Ergo, I don't even really have to care about the privacy dance while still being able to maintain my connections and event invitations and the like. Win-win.

    5. Re:I left Facebook... by vlm · · Score: 2

      But I also have no information on facebook. No pictures at all, no checkins aloud, no constant updates. Do what they want with security, I got nothing there.

      Then whats the point of joining or having an account? Once you block "everything" you have no reason to be there.

      I went thru the same thing.
      1) Sick of privacy violations? OK from now on, I'll never post anything I wouldn't put on a lawn sign. Boring!
      2) Sick of useless game/survey updates? OK I'll make a "game" out of spending time every night blocking each new app from my feed. Boring!
      3) Sick of the single and/or unemployed trolling daily for the obvious? OK I'll block them. Boring!
      4) Sick of the political wannabe agitators? OK I'll block them too. Boring!
      5) Sick of the top40 / pop culture / celebrity gossip babblers? OK I'll block them too. Boring!
      6) Sick of "non-friends", mostly ancient acquaintances, sending "friend" requests? OK I'll commit a major social faux pas and not friend them. Boy did I catch heat for that!

      Eventually all I had left was the real people doing real thing who were too busy to use facebook, so I had nothing to see.

      So I deleted my account.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:I left Facebook... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Events from my friends and a few places I hang out. That is all I use it for. Social events on social media... Who'd a thunk it?

    7. Re:I left Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My blog on how to leave Facebook and keep some of the interesting information: bryanquigley.com/uncategorized/leaving-facebook [bryanquigley.com]

      So to see your opinion, now I have to store or memorize your blog address. Multiply that by all my family, friends, co-workers, and business associates and I need a secretary to keep things sorted out. Too bad you ditched your FB account, since I could have just sent you a friend request or joined an informational group and never had to bother with it.

  10. users vs time by SemperUbi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bet the loss in users is nothing compared to the proportion of users who keep their accounts but don't use the site, or view without ever posting. The site is an unpleasant minefield of tiny little areas you never want to click on. If users are declining when so many people have more than one account, I bet they're tanking more than they'll ever want to admit.

    1. Re:users vs time by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I was wondering how they knew so many people had stopped using their accounts altogether but this number is just those who actively closed their account. I suspect the number of dormant accounts is triple or more.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:users vs time by black+soap · · Score: 1

      How many of those people had multiple identities? How many of those people were "closed" temporarily?

    3. Re:users vs time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they wouldn't want to admit that they are tanking anyway - but with an IPO in the offing that is an absolute no no. When this was posted on cnet a couple of weeks ago posters there were noticing it tied nicely with the new-found desire amongst fb hierarchy to start lobbying and suggesting that under 13s should be welcomed - all to hide the flagging support for the "miracle site" for an IPO.

      There was a speculative op-ed 6 months or so ago in the NYT (I am too lazy to find it now) in the finance dealbook section that basically stated that zuckerberg was a con-artist (obviously not stated like that for legal reasons), and that the IPO will be a massive pump-and-dump ponzi scheme. Given the slimy way they operate on privacy (it seems hard to believe that they have been behaving like shits all the way back to the beacon times) I have no doubt that they don't have moral compasses.

  11. One opinion by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    IMHO, the people who are leaving Facebook have realized that it's not just another blog where they can post semi-anonymous inflammatory political rhetoric. Their Facebook friends will come down on their bogus opinions hard and people don't like to be told that they're full of sh*t by people they know. Just one aspect, IMHO. For me, living far away from most of my long-time friends, it's nice to be able to passively catch up with them. If you disagree with me, then you are a heartless bastard. ;-)

    1. Re:One opinion by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Conversely they cannot express their true thoughts either for fear of their family and friends reactions.

    2. Re:One opinion by anyGould · · Score: 1

      For me, living far away from most of my long-time friends, it's nice to be able to passively catch up with them. If you disagree with me, then you are a heartless bastard. ;-)

      That's about where I am with Facebook - a low-maintenance way to keep up with old high-school/university friends that doesn't require exceptional effort on either person's part. (Essentially the digital form of bumping into them on the street and having a two-minute "what's up!" chat).

      The pyramid-scheme games ("get one more friend to sign up and we'll let you play our game more!") and the companies begging for "likes" everywhere.. I happily live without most of that.

    3. Re:One opinion by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Then they shouldn't have made their postings available to those people?

    4. Re:One opinion by second_coming · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I don't understand all the Facebook bashing. If people post stuff you don't like, either get Facebook to hide it or defriend them. It's not hard.

    5. Re:One opinion by Kozz · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the people who are leaving Facebook have realized that it's not just another blog where they can post semi-anonymous inflammatory political rhetoric. Their Facebook friends will come down on their bogus opinions hard and people don't like to be told that they're full of sh*t by people they know. Just one aspect, IMHO. For me, living far away from most of my long-time friends, it's nice to be able to passively catch up with them. If you disagree with me, then you are a heartless bastard. ;-)

      [You like this.]

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    6. Re:One opinion by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

      I agree with this to an extent. In real life, a conflict you have with a troll is usually an isolated incident. On FB, this conflict is visible to all your friends and family and is more threatening to your reputation. This has more devastating effects if the troll is more skilled in rhetoric than you and has a backing of more FB users. Also, people who don't see you in the most positive light will often take embarrassing photos or tag them in a humiliating manner, leaving you to spend hours each week deleting tags and doing your own damage control. In the end, for some people, namely myself, the peace of mind of not having to play social mind games clearly outweighs any benefit of having an FB account. If you're not willing to be a follower and obey the hive mind, or don't really care too much about your friends mundane crap, then FB probably isn't for you.

    7. Re:One opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they're just careful knowing damn well FB will have further failures in security and default settings?

    8. Re:One opinion by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      You mean stalk them from far away. I do the same thing, don't worry.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    9. Re:One opinion by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Or they can express their true thoughts and just trust their family and friends to love them for who they are. If your friends can only accept you based on some mask you wear, what the fuck is the point of being friends with them? And family? Well, they're family. There's always going to be something for them to bitch about so it might as well be that last thing you posted on FB.

  12. So, what's the difference? by snugge · · Score: 1

    "It's really gotten to a point where I know pretty much what my friends are going to post."

    Newsflash: your friends are just as predictable in real life.

    1. Re:So, what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but in real life, they don't bother shouting it on the pubic place which is basicaly what posting on facebook equals to.

  13. Shun the unbeliever! SHUN!!! by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

    Then again, maybe they're not losing users at all - maybe they're just cracking down on fake accounts.

  14. Anecdotal evidence by Inda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

    Those skilled in the internet have known Facebook will not last forever. The media, having hyped the living shite out of it for the past few years, are about to jump on the "Facebook is a sinking ship" hype, and I'm happy to help.

    Good riddance to bad websites.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Anecdotal evidence by dunezone · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about those of us who were on Facebook back when it was only University/College students. Once they opened the flood gates to everyone it lost that "secret society" appeal.

    2. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then all the kids will join another website that the parents know nothing about, that site will become the cool thing to join, until the parents sign up to this one, and.... well, let's just start singing "Circle of Life" from The Lion King!

    3. Re:Anecdotal evidence by second_coming · · Score: 1

      It's highly likely they set up new accounts and are making sure their parents don't get added as friends this time. My 18yo daugher isn't on my friends list as she wouldn't want me seeing her page and I wouldn't want her seeing mine.

    4. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those skilled in the internet"

      I wish this phrase could go viral

    5. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Hatta · · Score: 1

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      For what? Have they found the next big thing yet?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      For what? Have they found the next big thing yet?

      yep, i've heard talk that the next big thing is this place called 'the park'.

    7. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      For what? Have they found the next big thing yet?

      Yes, they have: It's a novel form of new social networking called MFTF (Meeting Face To Face)

    8. Re:Anecdotal evidence by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      that's always the case: music, stars, films, even games...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    9. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Abstrackt · · Score: 0

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      For what? Have they found the next big thing yet?

      I think they called it "human interaction".

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    10. Re:Anecdotal evidence by econolog · · Score: 1

      As a heads up apparently there is a new thing that is like facebook but has a lot more of the middle school/high school crowd and is beginning to spread to colleges. I don't know the name of it though.

    11. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Like Friendster and MySpace before it, the club is only cool when it's too cool for other people. Once every yutz is a member, including your parents and grandparents and kids, it's so unbounded and open that you can basically only put things there that you'd share publicly. Which isn't much. Which makes it lose much of its appeal. It would still be a decent, easy place to share photos and stuff, but the creepy marketing aspects kind of kill that use for me.

    12. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      For what? Have they found the next big thing yet?

      IRC?

    13. Re:Anecdotal evidence by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      What's going to happen when your young daughter and her friends realize they want a way to keep in touch with their parents? That scenario plays out more often than not. At that point the parents will be firmly set in their ways on facebook.

    14. Re:Anecdotal evidence by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "Those skilled in the internet have known Facebook will not last forever. "

      'Skilled in the internet" haha, WTH does that mean?

      Hey, I know the business on the corner is going to fail, does that make me skilled on roads?

      Also, facebook will be here for a very long time. Facebook will die just like Microsoft dies when Linux 1.0 came out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Anecdotal evidence by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      It's an internet system, I know this!

    16. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I think they called it "human interaction".

      That will never catch on.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    17. Re:Anecdotal evidence by AmazinglySmooth · · Score: 1

      What Facebook needs for this is to create online personas that limits to which "Friends" information is shared. Parents/grown-ups can be excluded from all the fun stuff. Technology prevails.

    18. Re:Anecdotal evidence by spiralx · · Score: 1

      You mean like groups, which Facebook has had for years? Pretty much anything you put on FB can have individual settings as to who can view it - friends of friends, friends, include/exclude by group/user or just me.

    19. Re:Anecdotal evidence by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Hey, I know the business on the corner is going to fail, does that make me skilled on roads?

      Actually, yes. The widespread ability to drive is why corner groceries have succumbed to big box grocery stores. But you'd only expect that if you'd already been to them.

      Facebook is AOL 2.0. It is now how old people experience the Internet, while the newbies who whet their teeth on Facebook are learning to go outside the sandbox.

      AOL is still around, but you'd get laughed at if you tried to claim it wasn't dead.

    20. Re:Anecdotal evidence by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      What's going to happen when your young daughter and her friends realize they want a way to keep in touch with their parents?

      And here I thought that's what cellphones were for.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    21. Re:Anecdotal evidence by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      My young daughter and her friends have recently left Facebook. The reason? Because everyone's parents now use Facebook.

      Bet they haven't left so much as just learned to create a new account that isn't named after their real name. That's what my adult friends did when their parents started using Facebook anyway.

    22. Re:Anecdotal evidence by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They'll talk to them when they get home? Or they'll call them on the phone?

      You do realize people survived and actually communicated with people BEFORE facebook right?

      Get this shocker, people (that includes parents and daughters since you seem to not know much about the world) actually were able to communicate without the Internet!

      Want to really blow your mind ... people can communicate with out telephones or electronics at ALL!

      Before you could type, you could write letters! It was fucking CRAZY back then.

      Before all that though, if you want to go REALLY REALLY REALLY fucking old school and show how leet you are ...

      You could just walk into the same fucking room and have an actual conversation with the person.

      It blows my mind that anyone would even make such a utterly retarded statement.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    23. Re:Anecdotal evidence by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Hey, if not using Facebook is cool, then I'm proud to say I haven't used Facebook since 1977!!

    24. Re:Anecdotal evidence by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      You seem to think I am advocating facebook. I get the impression that you are not a fan of it. There are a great many reasons to not like it. Unfortunately, the whims of society are rarely logical and well thought out. Like it or not, facebook seems to be the main form of communication for a lot of people.

      The OP's daughter is shunning facebook because her parents are on it. She apparently feels her parents are using it enough to warrant her shunning it so I conclude it is a primary means of communication for them.

      Kids looking to escape the watchful eyes of their parents is normal. It's also normal for people to realize that they value communicating with their parents. Yes, face to face is best. It's pretty much the only means of communication that has never fallen out of use, but people seem to need some method of asynchronous communication as well. Those methods seem to fall to the relentless march of technology (undoubtedly facebook will too). Generally the older generation has not kept up with the new means of communication, and the younger generation needs to fall back to what the older generation is comfortable with. As long as they are there, it keeps that channel alive. Mail correspondence seems to have fallen out of favor. I don't think it's coincidence that it's use is shrinking as fast as my grandparent's generation.

      So i wonder, if facebook is the preferred means of asynchronous communication for a great many people, will it be bolstered as those user's offspring look for a way of reaching out to their parents?

      For the record, I am somewhat ambivalent about facebook. It's not the ideal platform, but most of my friends and cousins are on it. We exchange information that I find valuable but wouldn't want to call everyone for once a week. I've found it helps to spark in person conversations as I can mention, "oh, i saw you were in a biathalon. how was that?" when i see my cousin at the next holiday get together. It seems more pertinent than the pre facebook conversations of, "hey remember 10 years ago when we were little and ate all those cookies?" every year. In short, i find some value in it, but wish there was something that could provide the same ease of use and attract as many people while being less, i don't know, icky.

    25. Re:Anecdotal evidence by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Is that, like, a P2P mesh network? That sounds cool.

      Does it run on open protocols, though?

    26. Re:Anecdotal evidence by xhrit · · Score: 1

      Facebook will be around for a long time. Just like how Friendster is still around, it is just completely irrelevant.

    27. Re:Anecdotal evidence by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the newest version is so confusing and badly designed that only a 15-year-old can decipher it!

    28. Re:Anecdotal evidence by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      God I wish! Open format, group/private chat, ability to host your own server, PROPER logging, ability to slam the BAN HAMMER, no javascript. Most people don't realize just how perfect the protocol really is. I just fear everyone would flock to a single server owned by some 20-year-old that stole the idea from their grandfather full of twilight MUDs :(

  15. So what? by Smigh · · Score: 1

    So its user base decreased around 3%, so what? I'm not a big facebook user but I find it funny how these little fluctuations always give rise to these sort of news saying that users are angry and whatnot.

    1. Re:So what? by rwven · · Score: 1

      The important thing is that this is the first DECREASE in accounts that they've had in a long time.

    2. Re:So what? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Really? I seem to remember hearing this several times in the past.

      Of course what that actually means is that this is a story about some other way of calculating things that shows them losing users in a new and exciting way thats not entirely unlike the previous way they calculated it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:So what? by rwven · · Score: 1

      This is the first decrease the've had in over a year....

  16. Eh, it's just First World ennui kicking in by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    I'd expand on that, but, uuuuurh. Wresting is on.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Eh, it's just First World ennui kicking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar! Wrestling is not on in the morning!

    2. Re:Eh, it's just First World ennui kicking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that wresting is on? Can I ask what is being wrested?

  17. Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have personally not dropped my facebook page but I visit a lot less often now. I've closed my blog page and I have returned to writing letters. I'm an IT admin so its a little difficult relearning to "write" with a pen so that others can read it. But a lot of my friends world-wide like the letter with the clipped photos and other things I send. There is something more personable in a letter that someone actually wrote and handled. i also got a custom wax stamp so i send them out with wax seals like they used to 100 years ago.

    1. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by instagib · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A written, physical letter is like a hand-made gift in these times. Between that and sites like Facebook there is still E-Mail - faster and more practical than the first, but much more personal (and hopefully with thoughtful content) than the latter. E-Mail is my favourite tool since 1991 to keep in contact with people I care about.

    2. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by GNious · · Score: 1

      I also got a custom wax stamp so i send them out with wax seals like they used to 100 years ago.

      Am thinking automated sorting-machines at the post-offices must love your letters :)

    3. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      Yep. But I am not that interesting so a letter from me every month is enough. Plus I like the idea that someone doesn't have to be plugged in to read my letter or look at pictures. This is especially true for some of my friends in other developing countries.

    4. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      LMAO! Yeah i imagine so, however I live in a small town. Chesterfield, SC where 5 cars in a row is considered a pile up. I doubt they have ever even seen an auto sorter of any type. But I seal up the letter and then drop it in a standard white business envelope so as not to cause to much pain. The wax seal is at the bottom, the stamping happens at the top.

    5. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by sgt101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I myself like to "write" letters by cutting out words and letters from the bible and gluing them onto paper to form messages such as "He is watching over you" and "Behold the glory of the lord is upon you" which I then send to people I find in the phone book.

      I don't use a wax seal though.

      --
      --------------------------------------------- "In the end, we're all just water and old stars."
    6. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      I cant find the spellcheck tab on this written letter thing.... or are you talking about using one of those special fonts that looks like cursive?

      Let's take into consideration that writing a nice letter in Cursive and finding that people cant read it because....

      A your handwriting in atrocious!
      B they dont teach it anymore
      C it sucked anyways.

      Honestly, it's a leftover from the medieval times. It has always sucked because of personal embellishments or simply lazy writers not making the squiggles the correct way. I have only seen 5 times in my life someone write a Capitol F correctly in Cursive.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the same hobby as me! I like to use a man wax seal myself though.

    8. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      Holy shit that is funny! I know a few that might get a kick out of that. Zanep in Istanbul might get a giggle or two.

    9. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I'm an IT admin so its a little difficult relearning to "write" with a pen so that others can read it.

      Scan your handwriting. Cut/Paste letters into a font maker software. Voila! Lovingly handwritten notes without all the bother of re-training yourself to use a pen.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. I' did just that. Even changed the font color to charcoal so it looks like it was written by hand.

    11. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a huge nerd. (Take that as a compliment.) That's a classy way to write a letter.

    12. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Works just fine, it throws them out if they aren't flat enough and they get manually sorted.

      FAR FAR weirder things are seen on any given day at any normal post office.

      Many government offices still wax seal certain things that get sent through the mail. Its more for tradition than security, but none the less the post office deals with them just fine.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Let me give you a hint, unless the person is blind or not bothering to actually read your letters, they know you didn't write them.

      Any printer thats going to make those letters look like what was scanned is not going to leave an impression on the paper like a pen or pencil would. Also all the letters will always look the same each time they are used, which means the flow will be obviously broken because you don't connect letters in the same way every time, regardless of it being cursive or print, humans naturally pick up on the unnatural perfect repetitiveness of such things.

      Scammers/Spammers spend FAR time trying to send you this type of fake letter than you ever are, and you can spot them a mile away as being fake, even when they go the extra mile of trying to fake a real signature on top of the other fake handwriting in a different color.

      Short version:

      You aren't fooling anyone with eyes good enough to actually read the letter themselves.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    14. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      thanks, but ... duh. I'm writing them by hand ... soon ... maybe.

    15. Re:Facebook is fueled by narcissism. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I have only seen 5 times in my life someone write a Capitol F correctly in Cursive.

      I've only seen 5 times in my life people use "Capitol" correctly.

      (P.S. This wasn't one of them.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  18. Uhh, privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're telling me no one is leaving the site due to worries over personal privacy?

  19. Go live real life by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Turn off the TV, shut down the computer, and go interact with other people, or go do something with your hands. You'd be amazed how many calories you burn by puttering around in the garage or in the yard, or by meeting friends out in public. You should especially do this kind of stuff in the years between 18 and getting married. Don't worry about updating your status, use that smartphone to assist being out and about, not as a replacement for it.

    Life is short, don't squander it.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Go live real life by instagib · · Score: 3, Funny

      shut down the computer

      I can't, I forgot the root password, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Go live real life by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      go do something with your hands

      But...but...I need my computer to get all the por...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the reason I do use facebook. I went to my 25th grade school reunion, many parties and a ton of shows with my friends because of facebook. I wouldn't have known most of these were happening, and the grade school reunion was almost spur of the moment and quickly organized because of facebook.

      Yes, some people "waste" time on farmville, but that's no different than time spent playing video games. Facebook has made it possible to organize real-world events with many people that were very difficult and time consuming to contact before that.

    4. Re:Go live real life by Hodapp · · Score: 1

      Using Facebook (or any other online social network) and living a real life are not mutually exclusive.

    5. Re:Go live real life by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I am so sick of you people.

      Who are you to tell other people they are squandering their life? who are you to know the value of such things? Who do you think you are to imply you can't make new friends online?

      Fucking Luddite. And the only way that could be more literal is if you where actually destroying looms.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet... there you sit, posting a reply on /. -- Go figure it out, Einstein!

    7. Re:Go live real life by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      There are few things more annoying than people who tell you how to live your life or spend your money.

    8. Re:Go live real life by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      shut down the computer, and go interact with other people, or go do something with your hands

      Computers make interacting with people so much easier. This entire conversation would be impossible were it not for computers.

      And I don't know how you code, but I usually use my hands.

    9. Re:Go live real life by adeft · · Score: 1

      Say what? I know this is slashdot and all, but how can you compare the joys of real life to using a screen and keyboard. Sure you can use it to generate money, build a program or play with friends online. Compare these feats with something like building a bird house, competing in an adrenaline inducing physical activity, or playing with a new puppy. Sure if we were to live exclusively online, it would take away lots of life's dangers, but at the cost of a pretty diluted existance. And yes you can have online friends, but mine can help me move.

    10. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be an idiot, boot from a live cd/live usb stick, mount the partition that holds /etc as rw and edit shadow, copy the password from your uid to root. Unmount, reboot.

      (Yeah, well, I had nothing better to do.)

    11. Re:Go live real life by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 1

      Because it is not about whether one course of action is superior to another, but whether one persons view of which course of action is superior to another should be forced on everyone. Good intentions + power over others = evil.

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
    12. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, I think this might be an overreaction. I personally found a great deal merit in doing more or less what he is talking about. In my teens I was a hardcore nerd, what with the linux and the ultima online and such. Then in my early twenties I decided to try turning it off and going for a run or hitting the gym, best decision I ever made. I slept with way more chicks than I imagined I would, had wayyy too much fun, traveled all over, even climbed Mt Kilimanjaro, crazy. Now I'm an upper-level developer, doing what I love and I have a ton of awesome experiences to boot. So for what it's worth (not much), I would second his recommendation.

    13. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off the TV, shut down the computer, and go interact with other people, or go do something with your hands. You'd be amazed how many calories you burn by puttering around in the garage or in the yard, or by meeting friends out in public. You should especially do this kind of stuff in the years between 18 and getting married. Don't worry about updating your status, use that smartphone to assist being out and about, not as a replacement for it.

      Life is short, don't squander it.

      Agreed. Totally like this! Where's that Like button?

      Oh, wait, never had and never will have an account on Facebook.....

    14. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should especially do this kind of stuff in the years between 18 and getting married.

      There's the problem. Most people I know that are married with kids did so as soon as they hit 18. The ones that are no longer that young are just too freaking tired after working 60+ hour weeks to run around and deal with more drama.

      They were in such a hurry to grow up that by the time they're in their 30's they'll already be burnt out and tired. Then they waste the next 40 years sitting around recanting their glory days in High School before dying of lung cancer. Anyone left with the desire and energy to maintain a hobby are the "socially inept" geeks.

      Life is short, don't squander it.

      That's what most of them said as they were speeding through their youth, many of them are now more tired than I am at the end of the day and I'm 10 years older.

    15. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Totally like this! Where's that Like button?

      Just a second: is it right as I just noticed ./ is the last website in the entire GALAXY actually WITHOUT "Like" buttons.
      So Facebook folks actually know everywhere I've been except ./

      Wow, Chapeau!

    16. Re:Go live real life by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      push the power button, wait for ACPI shutdown.

      alt-control-delete, and power off when the disks aren't mounted.

      pull the power cord, you are using a journaled file system right?

      Its a good thing you aren't a geek cause man you'd suck at it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    17. Re:Go live real life by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, but from a practical perspective, people typically do one are the other, not both. Doing both is pretty rare.

      The problem is that people drawn to social networking sites are generally those people that already have issues with social interaction.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    18. Re:Go live real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he could reboot he wouldn't have the problem you are trying to solve.

    19. Re:Go live real life by TWX · · Score: 1

      This isn't a conversation though, this is the evolved form of a computer system graffiti wall. It's a bunch of posts, some of which get replies.

      I do this when I am forced to wait but when my time is otherwise not my own, and I use Slashdot as a way of keeping up with some of the developments in one of my hobbies. Slashdot gets an appropriate amount of my time as such, a couple of hours a week. It can't help me with model rocketry, ham radio, swing dancing, auto restoration, trebuchet construction, or many other things. It can help me with computers and electronics, and sometimes with science fiction fandom, and that's what I use it for. Oh, and bad jokes. Good place to steal bad jokes from.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    20. Re:Go live real life by TWX · · Score: 1

      Heh. Friends. I did the whole, "make friends with people on the computer" in my BBS and IRC days. I even met about 30 of them IRL at GTs. One real-life friend is easily worth ten Internet "friends".

      It's funny to call me a luddite when I see blogger, livejournal, blogspot, myspace, friendster, and facebook as reinventions of the same things. Sure, some new features get added from time to time, but it's still the same crap that dates back to the BBS message bases, fidonet, and usenet. "Social Media" is not an advancement at all, it's holding us back by making us think that the trivial crap is what's important, and the important stuff is lost in the chaff. It's vanity publishing. If I want to get caught up in the details of someone else's life, it's because I've personally observed those details, not read about what they think is important. When I see real advances in technology headed in a direction that I agree with I'm quite happy to assimilate them into my life. PDAs, smartphones, the ability to bargain-hunt on the fly in stores, the ability to make changes to my itinerary or to get around traffic problems or to find new places and know I'll be able to get out again with good maps are all great developments. Allowing people to talk at me about their cats isn't.

      If you get in trouble, how many Internet Friends are going to help you? How many can you count on to interrupt what they're doing and come to lend you a hand?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    21. Re:Go live real life by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      This isn't a conversation though

      Of course it's a conversation. It's just held over much longer periods of time than your more typical conversations. In some ways it's an inferior mode of communication: I can't see your facial expressions or read any nuance in your verbal delivery, for instance. But in other ways it's much more powerful. Look here:

      Good place to steal bad jokes from.

      See, I can't do that in conventional conversation. I can't pull your words out and play them back in real life. I can't give rich contextual answers with speech alone. And you're ignoring the vast distances at play. And the fact that we are talking with each other, and yet can have millions of others listening in to us.

    22. Re:Go live real life by instagib · · Score: 1

      The combined noise of your and the ACs wooshes was deafening.

    23. Re:Go live real life by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      in the years between 18 and getting married[...]Life is short, don't squander it

      Heh you said "married" and "squandering your life" :D

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  20. Another non-story by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    So, people get on Facebook. The use it for awhile. They decide they don't like it. The get off of it. Quelle surprise.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  21. Real-world consequences by odin84gk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not going to say this is the start of the end, but it certainly shows that people are no longer "excited" about the social network world.

    People are noticing real-world consequences to the privacy issues, reducing the amount of interesting stuff that people will post. I've run into employer issues, I've had relatives with relationship issues, and I've read enough about legal issues to be wary about what I post. Add in the number of businesses embracing Facebook, and you start to see why "social networks" have reached a saturation point.

    It still has its uses. It is more personal than email (great for keeping your family updated on life events). It is easier to control reoccurring events, such as birthday parties and pick-up games in the park. It is also easier to ignore people on Facebook than through email. I will continue to use it about as regularly as I use my email, but that doesn't mean I like it.

    1. Re:Real-world consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "keeping your family updated on life events"

      Exactly! Weddings, births, deaths are life events, not what you ate or where you shat.

    2. Re:Real-world consequences by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. Facebook has gone from greatest thing ever to another tool in the kit. I use it to keep up with family & friends and keep track of events I might want to attend. No games, nothing too crazy.

      Myself, it wasn't just about the privacy issues or employers crawling it or whatnot (although I am certainly aware of it more than in the past). It just got to the point where I organically whittled out the B.S. and kept what I liked. Frankly, I wonder what else I could need? I have MSN, Yahoo & Facebook, plus E-mail. I might need another chat protocol in the future, but that's about it.

      Honestly, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the next big thing is a Facebook client for the desktop. Distributed chat, events, statuses and games

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    3. Re:Real-world consequences by B33RM17 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have been one of those people no longer excited about social networking for some time, and I find that Facebook has lost a lot of its' value. The only thing keeping me from leaving it is all the people and family I left when I transferred schools, and how easy it is to stay in contact with them. These sites are still an adequate tool for maintaining such relationships, but it can be frustrating to do so with all the mindless junk that gets mixed in.

      What is sad yet no less true is that sites like Facebook are seen as a requirement for being a social person. Being an introverted person, this fact seems to glare at me the more I use Facebook. I have tried being the social person that "shares" with everyone, but anymore I find myself cherishing the genuine human contact I receive from actually talking to people. Sure Facebook is great for wasting a couple minutes to catch up with everything going on in your world. But its good for no more than that. Life truly is more fulfilling when you just close that tab, and do something else. I'm not leaving it, just leaving it alone.

      --
      My blood hurts...
  22. from the we-hates-it dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Damnit. Now I'm constantly envisioning Zuckerberg cowering before some Terminal, uttering "They stole it from us!"

    1. Re:from the we-hates-it dept. by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Will he be tortured by Sauron, then sent to find it?

    2. Re:from the we-hates-it dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can only wish...

  23. I don't miss it by g051051 · · Score: 2

    I dumped Facebook a few months back, because I got tired of having to constantly tweak the privacy settings, and I was drowning in Zynga spam from other users.

    1. Re:I don't miss it by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Person doesn't know how to use a tool, blames tool. News at 11.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I don't miss it by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Tools don't dynamically reconfigure themselves without any user interaction to do something the user clearly never wanted to happen.

      Facebook does. Often.

      Its not a tool, its users are.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  24. I'm one of those 6 Million... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had one for a (short) while, but I got sick and tired of having to go back in and turn stuff off every time they "improved" their "privacy" settings. It was like nailing jello to a wall. The only "payoff" was being contacted by asshats from high school that I didn't want to talk to anyway.So I nuked it, then rooted my phone and deleted the app from there too. Done.

  25. Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Facebook is following the same trajectory of all social networking sites from the dawn of the Internet ... people pile in, then eventually take a harder look at the product they are becoming and start to pull away, starting a long bleeding decline. What's astonishing is that once again, a company appeared which honestly seemed to think they were different, that they weren't subject to the same pattern of free-growth and decay-on-monitization.

    1. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by luke923 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The funny thing about this is that it's all predictable. I like to call this the Uncle Johnny Factor. Why you ask? Well, I have an uncle who's name happens to be Johnny who happens to hop on to tech trends at the very tail end. He set up a Geocities account in 2003, moved to MySpace in 2008, and got onto Facebook just recently. So, for all intents and purposes, he serves for me as a canary in the coal mine -- whenever he signs up for something, you know it's no longer cool.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    2. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The difference is the Facebook changes. Most other previous sites didn't change.

      That is the key to survival from any company.
      Facebook will be here for decades.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Not really, look at MySpace.

      They changed, and arguably that's what led to their demise.
      The point is that these companies need to find a way to make money while keeping their userbase, and those two objectives may not always be compatible.

      Now I believe that if Facebook wants to, they'll be able to monetize their network without scaring their users away, but I also believe that their management is too greedy for the kind of slow sustainable growth they could get that way.
      Instead, their actions seem to point towards the kind of "shooting star" growth which inevitably will mean increasing their privacy abuses, and turn people off even more than they are now.

      Most of my friends are already cautious of the privacy implications of using Facebook. I think the field is almost ripe for the next best thing to come along and throw FB in the corner with MySpace.

      And it won't be a day too late.

    4. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You're getting all that from a rumor that has Facebook losing something less than 1% of it's users? You're either the most prescient individual ever (and should be an investment consultant), or you're a pompous windbag blowing smoke because the rumors confirm your bias.

    5. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell your uncle about twitter.

    6. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by jkmartin · · Score: 1

      In those cases users left the previous site for something else (Geocities to Friendster to Myspace to Facebook). So what are Facebook users leaving for now? Twitter? I will never go to Twitter. Back to blogging? Good luck with that. Facebook has not only reached saturation, they've reached burnout. Few places left to grow and few new features to add that don't cross over into being creepy.

    7. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Myspace as haemorrhaging users long before they started updating the site, and those changes were either minor tweaks to try and mimic existing FB functionality, fixes for glaring usability issues, and then the revamp which changed the site into something unrecognisable and, well, shit. But Myspace was barely a social network in the sense FB is - you could add friends, post a comment on their page or photo, and that's about it. Oh wait, crappy blogs, and really terrible events.

      Facebook already makes a profit, not a huge one, but relatively impressive given the infrastructure they must need to service 500 million users, each of which gets a totally unique homepage and view of almost every other page. Given network effects, what is this "next best thing" going to have that will draw the majority of users away from FB?

    8. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I don't know much about MySpace. I came late to that party, and when I did, MySpace was already an ugly mess of animated gifs, flash animations and loud music (on autoplay, no less).

      I always thought that FB grew out from the exodus of people who preferred to use a clean and professionally-designed social network (that is, FB exploded after myspace made the changes), but I could be wrong. I don't know which features which website had at the time.

      As for FB's financials, I thought those were hidden, since they aren't a publicly traded company (yet). Wikipedia tells us their ad profits, but says nothing about their operating costs, so who really knows if they're making that much money.
      In any case, it's pretty clear they're aiming to accelerate their growth, and as I said, it'll be hard to do that without impacting their users negatively.

      Given network effects, what is this "next best thing" going to have that will draw the majority of users away from FB?

      I wish I knew. But then again, no one could've predicted that FB would take over MySpace, or that Twitter would grow so large.
      My point was, there's already a growing sentiment of distrust in FB. If that continues to mount, the conditions will be ripe for another exodus to the new coolest thing.

    9. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Every site changes, and in social networking those changes are always to bring in more people ... and the end result is the end up ruining it by trying to serve the lowest common denominator ... which NO ONE ANYWHERE actually wants. MySpace, Livejournal, and Facebook have all done the same thing. Facebook is simply the latest one in the chain, thinking its different shows your lack of understanding.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has he invested in Bitcoin? ;)

    11. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      I can't be both?

    12. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Myspace was a combination of music promotion and primitive social networking - it was the music side that made it so popular, as at the time there wasn't anything else around that did anything like it for free (like Youtube). Facebook started with college students in the US, and went public probably around the time Myspace was at its peak. There was a definite year or two where FB started picking up users more and more rapidly before Myspace started losing users - a combination of increased exposure of FB, Myspace's primitive features, horrific UI and regular errors and outages. After then yeah, most people dropped Myspace for Facebook - network effects again.

      Facebook was cleaner looking, responsive (due to pervasive use of AJAX), had photo tagging, privacy features and probably most important, the news feed on the homepage showing you things your friends were doing without ever having to leave that page. Myspace never really grew beyond the idea of customisable band pages really.

      You're right their accounts aren't open, but every indication is that they're moderately profitable. Certainly given their slice of the online ad business and huge user base I'd be surprised if they weren't...

      Facebook was clearly a better social network than Myspace from the start; the flaws of Myspace meant that someone was always going to come along and do the social part better, and Myspace hadn't captured a large or demographically-varied enough set of users for lock-in via network effects. The growing sentiment of distrust of FB is still just minute fraction of those 500 million users, and there aren't (right now) any other major issues that would encourage people to think about moving elsewhere (if there was anywhere).

    13. Re:Facebook, meet Myspace, meet Geocities by assertation · · Score: 1

      How interesting and how terrible!

      I bet your Uncle Johnny is a nice guy. Take him out for a cup of coffee

  26. Nothing to do with Facebook by erroneus · · Score: 2

    As far as I am concerned, this has more to do with how Facebook (and others) are used against people in the work place, at school, by insurance companies, by lawyers and even during pre-employment screenings. As it has been legally supported by court rulings that it's okay to use that information for those purposes (despite the fact that it hinders certain constitutional amendments, the separation of personal and professional life and more), it comes down to the users having two choices: participate or not participate.

    I saw this LONG long ago and I decided not to participate as the best option. I think others are beginning to see it as well.

    1. Re:Nothing to do with Facebook by kpainter · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned, this has more to do with how Facebook (and others) are used against people in the work place, at school, by insurance companies, by lawyers and even during pre-employment screenings. As it has been legally supported by court rulings that it's okay to use that information for those purposes (despite the fact that it hinders certain constitutional amendments, the separation of personal and professional life and more), it comes down to the users having two choices: participate or not participate.

      I saw this LONG long ago and I decided not to participate as the best option. I think others are beginning to see it as well.

      Like

    2. Re:Nothing to do with Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Nothing to do with Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Nothing to do with Facebook by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      As it has been legally supported by court rulings that it's okay to use that information for those purposes (despite the fact that it hinders certain constitutional amendments, the separation of personal and professional life and more),

      Actually, any company is free to use the information anyway they see fit. Show me a case that was tried and a ruling issued to the contrary. No, settlements don't count.

      If your stupid enough to post information that may show you in a bad light on a public bulletin board, companies have every right to avoid your stupid ass.

      If you aren't smart enough to keep your private life PRIVATE, why the fuck would I or anyone else want to deal with you? You think stupidity should be rewarded or something? We won't hire people who have a facebook profile that we can find. Take me to court and sue me, I dare you. The separation of personal and professional life ended when you made personal public. You made that choice, not me. You live with the results of your decisions, not me.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  27. Thank-you Adium and Pidgin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I can use third-party clients for Facebook chat I don't need to visit the actual FB site any more. For me, it's always just been the latest (and most awkward from my point of view) IM service in a line stretching back through MSN all the way back to ICQ.

    1. Re:Thank-you Adium and Pidgin! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use a standard IM protocol that everyone supports and encourage your friends to do the same so no one is tied to a specific provider.

      Oh thats right ... facebook claimed they were going to join the XMPP world ... what happened to that again?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  28. Affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left Facebook because my wife became emotionally involved with one of my friends on it! And I've heard about twenty stories of people who have wound up hooking up with an old flame, often cheating on their wives or husbands this way.

    I enjoyed social networking and really didn't want to leave, but the fact is that it turns out that some people I have known in the past and was trying to keep in my present are simply dangerous!

    1. Re:Affairs by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the technology for you ignoring your wife and not meeting her needs so she looks elsewhere for her hook-up. You have a very shakey foundation for your marriage.. Let me guess you two are not each others best friend. Start working on that because you should have been that.

      Not blaming you completely, but she started the problem looking for something you were unwilling or unknowingly not giving her, and you are perpetuating it by not changing your behavioral tactics.

      Or she is a nympho and wants to hum everything..... in that case, YOU ROCK SIR!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? Millions of people go without their needs being met and still don't have an affair. It's called boundaries. Your chain of cause and effect in your first sentence is just completely faulty, and its the kind of faulty thinking that leads a lot of sickos to think that they are entitled to do something despicable if they feel like their needs aren't being met in marriage adequately.

      For most people whose needs aren't met and they have an affair, there is a corresponding betrayed spouse at home who did not have an affair and whose needs also were not met. (Affairees typically don't put a lot of effort into meeting the needs of their spouse!)

      I am not to blame at all for my wife's choice to look outside our marriage for companionship. She agrees.

      you are perpetuating it by not changing your behavioral tactics

      Where did I say I don't change to be a better husband? My wife and I work hard to change and adjust to each other every day.

      Anyway, I didn't post here for marital advice. I just wanted to comment on the social climate on Facebook. Many people just think it's normal to continue to hang around old flames after they are married to someone else, and many people think it's normal to become close friends with somebody else's spouse. And many of them are outright predators. Can people stay on Facebook and maintain proper boundaries and eliminate all that? Sure they can. (Start by not being friends with old flames. It's called boundaries.) But we left. It was just too painful a reminder.

    3. Re:Affairs by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Right, its facebooks fault your wife is a whore.

      She was going to cheat on you anyway, if you can't recognize that you're an idiot.

      If you're wife is cheating on you, your relationship is the problem, not facebook. Whats next, you'll blame Motel 6 for the fact that your wife slept with him cause they provided a bed for them to use while you were off dicking around on Facebook and ignoring her?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Affairs by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If she was a nympho then he wouldn't be spending time on facebook ... unless its to talk to his gay friends.

      Either way, he clearly doesn't rock.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  29. Sounds like Sensationalistic media to me by hellfire · · Score: 2

    If you aren't rising, you are falling. The public loves a good riches to rags story just as much as they like a rags to riches. So total active users dropped 6 million out of 700 million total. Big deal. In terms of a subscriber base it doesn't really matter. There are still tons of accounts ripe for data mining. Maybe those accounts were false accounts. Maybe they were expired accounts from people who got their old Facebook account hacked and created a brand new one and the old one finally lapsed. Maybe some people died.

    Maybe FB is plateauing. It happens to every huge company, they have stop growing sometime. Maybe they drop 1% and their gains/losses level off. But thanks to the 24 hr news cycle we have "oh noes! FB is ded because a few people went outside! Film at 11!"

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Sounds like Sensationalistic media to me by rsborg · · Score: 1

      There are still tons of accounts ripe for data mining.

      Stale data is not as useful for data mining. Trending data, for example is often far more valuable than static data (like birthdate)... which is why people hated Twitter's #dickbar.

      Lack of user interest will directly affect the value of Facebook's private data to their real customers (the paying ones).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:Sounds like Sensationalistic media to me by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Hype Cycle

      I'd say FB is somewhere around the peak. In not too long (maybe post-IPO), the media will turn on it, and in a couple years FB will settle out as useful for the reasons described in other posts here.

      FWIW, I cancelled my account a long time ago due to the privacy shenanigans and personal repulsion at FB's business practices and ethically challenged CEO.

  30. Hmm... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    divorce rate in the US: about 48% (depending on what stats you use)

    Number of lawyers that advise clients to delete their Facebook accounts the second they file for divorce: rising significantly.

    Or hey, maybe everyone is quitting and installing their own Diaspora node. Yup, that HAS to be it!

  31. Familiarity by wombatmobile · · Score: 2

    a college student from Virginia, says Facebook has become predictable. "It's really gotten to a point where I know pretty much what my friends are going to post. They usually just write the same thing over and over again...

    This is the other side of the bar that the Turing Test seeks to hurdle. Many real human beings, it turns out, after a while, become highly predictable.

    What would Turing say about this phenomenon?

    1. Re:Familiarity by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Ted -- 4:20 WOOOO! whos' meeting me for a roach?

      Steve -- cant man, I'm already baked....

      John -- Why d oyou guys only think of pot?

      Ted -- Dont force your morals on me!

      Steve -- I'm hungry...

      John -- Ted you are failing 3 classes, I'll help but you have to do it sober!

      Ted -- I'm free and you are jealous! come on man smoke a fatty with me!

      Steve -- Stupid Girlfriend left me! I need to get drunk!

      Yeah, college students are HIGHLY predictable... POT, Booze and Drama... Repeat until they either grow up or crash a car and their page turns into a memorial.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turing's test assumes that both machine and human have a significantly higher than average intelligence. An average human being is quite predictable. Predictable enough that a Turing test wouldn't be able to tell human from machine.

      It takes an elevated level of intelligence to be able to "think outside the box", which is what the Turing test is designed to detect (answering with un-canned answers).

      The whole exercise is designed to detect "awareness", and frankly, not many people are truly aware.
       

    3. Re:Familiarity by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      fuck them, that what he would had said had he not been chemically castrated

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    4. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is something Brian Christian talks about in his (highly recommended) book "The Most Human Human", where he talks about his experience in the Loebner competition, a realized form of the Turing test. He calls it "conversation from the book", referring to when chess masters play from the books of well-known openings and ends of games.

    5. Re:Familiarity by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In the old days would could figure out if our friends were boring before Facebook...

      Seriously, I think the problem is the incessant updating of status and comments. When you check Facebook every 5 minutes of course it'll be boring! Check back once a month and it'll be much more interesting.

      "John's getting married, how about that!"
      Two weeks later
      "John's still getting married, nothing new here..."
      Two weeks later
      "Nothing new from John? Sheesh, show me pictures of what you had for lunch already!"

  32. cocky site by scarboni888 · · Score: 2

    i got banned from facebook without any explanation whatsoever. They must think they're pretty fucking special they can go around doing that to people. Well f-them - my life improved dramatically after that due to actually attending to my life as opposed to wasting time on their garbage so they actually did me a favour.

    1. Re:cocky site by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 3, Funny

      and yet you sound so bitter...

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:cocky site by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      that's got nothing to do with getting kicked off FB though. That existed before FB and will exist long after. But at least now I do things other than play mobwars all day at work and there's nothing wrong with that now, is there?

    3. Re:cocky site by geekoid · · Score: 1

      With that attitude I can't imagine you're doing those things with anyone.

      Also, you're work ethic sucks, and that's not mobwars fault.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:cocky site by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Yeah well YOUR spelling sucks. And that isn't my fault, pal.

    5. Re:cocky site by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Thats probably the best response to a childish tit for tat string I've seen yet. Priceless ending. I'd mod up if I hadn't posted :)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  33. Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Funny

    Having my parents join completely changed my use of FB, and to some extent real life. as now every possible drunken shenanigans picture might get a comment from my mom.

    Now I can have my overbearing over protective mom follow me and judge me all the time? Brilliant!

    Oh and don't dare not friend them, or unfriendly them. That just makes it worse.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having my parents join completely changed my use of FB, and to some extent real life. as now every possible drunken shenanigans picture might get a comment from my mom.

      Now I can have my overbearing over protective mom follow me and judge me all the time? Brilliant!

      Oh and don't dare not friend them, or unfriendly them. That just makes it worse.

       
      Yep...My FB experience was pretty much over when Mom 'friend-ed' me. And it was Completely Over when the Mother-In-Law wanted to be my 'friend'.

    2. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      It was completely over for me when my 21 year old, tattoo loving kids ( twin girls ) friended me.

    3. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by vlm · · Score: 1

      Having my parents join completely changed my use of FB, and to some extent real life. as now every possible drunken shenanigans picture might get a comment from my mom.

      Now I can have my overbearing over protective mom follow me and judge me all the time?

      It goes both ways. I, uh, friended your mom last night, if you know what I mean... and the kids are all like "TMI" "do not want" "must scrub image from mind". Mom seeing kids act in public like idiots is "sorta OK" since she did that in real life for about the first 5 to 35 years of kids life (depending how fast the kid grew up), but kids seeing mom act like idiot in public is "not OK".

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't post pictures for your mom to see? For quite a while now you've been able to put friends into different groups who can only see some pictures or some status updates or what-have-you.

    5. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ELAINE: Yeah. Why not Susan. I should be friends with Susan. (smacks
      her forehead with hand) Of course! Susan! Oh! OK, I’ll see you
      guys. Huh. (rushes out the door.)

      KRAMER: That's gunna be trouble.

      JERRY: Why?

      KRAMER: Jerry, don't you see? This world here, this is George's
      sanctuary. If Susan comes into contact with this world, his world's
      collide. You know what happens then?

      (Kramer raises his hands into the air and slowly brings them together in
      an explosion. He's holding some food in one hand, so when his hands
      come into contact food flies all over)

      KRAMER: Ka shha shha shha Pkooo (exploding sound)

      source

    6. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by The+Phantom+Mensch · · Score: 1

      I friended my daughter as soon as I joined. She is 13 and didn't make a big deal about it. I also friended two of her old friends just because I was a newbie and hadn't put much thought into it. It's very obvious to me which friends don't have their parents on facebook. They're the ones that don't think twice about what dumb or obscene things they post.

      If I knew their parents better I'd drag them to a computer and walk them through the crap their kids are spewing on facebook.

      If future employers are really going to look at your facebook page using some advanced data mining app that finds all the dirt about you the best thing you can do is act like everything that goes there will be read by your parents.

    7. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Here's the best clip I've ever seen...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8xbgdw9uvY&NR=1&feature=fvwp

      If you haven't seen it watch the whole "Friendface" episode some time... hell watch the whole series...

    8. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by adeft · · Score: 1

      My dad recently registerred on facebook and attempted to friend me. I denied his request, and when asked about it I told him "You are not my friend, you are my dad" Then again, I'm in my late 20's, and have my own house and family, which is probably a different scenario than the OP.

    9. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another solution: create a restricted group where they can only see very little (what do you mean you can't see my wall? Must be a bug of facebook :-)

    10. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by vux984 · · Score: 1

      which is probably a different scenario than the OP.

      Probably.

      He probably thinks his Dad as a friend.

      I know do... and I have my own house and family too. In fact, after moving out and having kids is about when I started thinking of my parents as friends.

    11. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Nah, my parents will always be my parents, and I love them. But I'm hellaciously independent and can't stand their oversight/judgement. Their time to control me was up until I was 18. Then they have to let me be me, and hope to god they did a good enough job. I think they did, as I turned out ok (well, I am on slashdot..) but my in large we are proud of each other. I just can't deal with my mom 'liking' every post and taking every phone call when I indicate disappointment. FYI I'm 34, and bought my house 10 years ago.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    12. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Friend Lists 'filters'; use them.

      But this is hilarious coming from Slashdot, the original Facebook.

    13. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as now every possible drunken shenanigans picture might get a comment from my mom.

      Dude, wait for every possible drunken shenanigans picture you ever posted in the past get a comment from your perspective employers...

    14. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by adeft · · Score: 1

      Exactly, thanks for the clarification. Parents should be parents. I love my dad, called him on Father's Day and sent him a card. But I'll be damned if I allow him to scroll through pictures/posts of myself and friends.

    15. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Uhm, maybe they could friend me? Wink Wink

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    16. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      My dad most certainly was my best friend until my wife. I probably wouldn't need to deny him though, he was smart/wise enough to know there were times when dad had to not be dad. Of course, the only thing in my life that I've actually got punished for by my father was lying to him. Even having been bailed out of jail multiple times when I was a little G didn't get me punished unless I lied to him, so its not like he doesn't know all the crazy shit I did anyway.

      Of course, when I realized that lying to him was pointless because he was way smarter and wiser (i.e. he did all this shit when he was a kid and dealt with my 4 older siblings before me, he KNEW before I did half the time!) I stopped lying to him and started listening to him. Thank god I did, I'm still a douche in a lot of ways, but oh my god it could have been much worse.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    17. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, my parents will always be my parents, and I love them. But I'm hellaciously independent and can't stand their oversight/judgement. Their time to control me was up until I was 18. Then they have to let me be me, and hope to god they did a good enough job. I think they did, as I turned out ok (well, I am on slashdot..) but my in large we are proud of each other. I just can't deal with my mom 'liking' every post and taking every phone call when I indicate disappointment. FYI I'm 34, and bought my house 10 years ago.

      Vux, this is your mom. We watch you all the time on this funny slashdot thing too dear.

    18. Re:Facebook Kryptonite: Parents by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Beware. Kids imitate what they see and Karma is a bitch.

  34. Re:Now hear this : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only wish it were possible to sterilize them all
    via their computer screens ...

    If only...

  35. get used to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these usage rates will continue to drop as more and more people realize that facebook isn't really that useful once you're already connected to people.

    i hope beyond hope that they IPO as soon as possible so that lots of idiotic investors can see what can happen to an internet service company in the matter of a year or so when they are no longer the goto place.

  36. Predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like MySpace, LiveJournal, etc before it. Nobody's gotten the social formula perfect enough to even survive the evolution of their own customer base, let alone long term internet social structure trends. I'm one of many who has deleted my own facebook account in the past 6 months, but I'm atypical to begin with (I only grudgingly made an account, and hardly ever posted anything, and it always made me uncomfortable - my tipping point was all their privacy bullshit recently).

    Privacy concerns by the paranoid like myself aside, the major problem with facebook for the masses is this:

    People are realizing that with how well-connected the social graph is in Facebook, there truly is no way to compartmentalize your life there. If you decide to live on Facebook and post your real life there, you can't filter that stream of data/opinion/image the way most people do in real life. Most people have several different versions of themselves: the one they present to their parents, the one they present to close friends, to associates, to potential dating/marriage partners, to religious friends, to potential and current employers, etc, etc.

    There is no strategy that can accomplish this on Facebook while still making Facebook useful. Even if you use a pseudonym account, if you link with your friends, and they link their families and jobs, etc... one way or another the social network corrects itself and you will end up indirectly telling your grandmother, your ex-girlfriend, and your boss about what happened the morning after you took that slut home from that shady singles bar.

    1. Re:Predictable by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I still keep my facebook account around to manage business fan pages and keep in touch with friends, but I've ended up turning off commenting on my wall because the last thing I want is for different friend groups to mingle- I have some friends who are hardcore atheists, and I have some very religious friends. I really don't want my wall to become a battle zone. Additionally, have you ever tried going out into the dating world with a facebook profile? Even though casual dates aren't exclusive and it's an unspoken truth that you're probably dating other people (like trying on shoes), the last thing you need is somebody who knows somebody posting "how was your date last night with xyz," things could get harry.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
  37. Facebook spokesman: "Facebook is like broccoli"?! by __roo · · Score: 1

    From TFA: Facebook officials say their service is good for people. "Facebook can be like broccoli," [Facebook spokesman] Schnitt says. "Everyone can benefit from it but not everyone will want to."

    That's very unflattering. Is that really how Facebook is perceived by the people who work there?

  38. Isn't that why she became a stay at home mom? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    To be come a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life at some job while someone else raises her kids?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  39. Mafia Wars Dup users by Brigadier · · Score: 1

    I always figured a big portion of this was;

    a.) mafia wars/farmville/anyville dupe users who make fake users to play and support there game. Who fnially realize it's a life waster.
    b.) myspace users who moved over and created the standard alter ego then realized that's not really a facebook thing.

  40. Re:Now hear this : by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    I had lived in Houston for over 5 years and not really made any friends. I hooked up with the EFNET #houston IRC channel and within weeks was going out to clubs with people I had met in the channel. We even got reserved seating for a few movie premiers because of the group. `Lumpy`

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  41. SP Parody by jonathansdt · · Score: 1

    More and more people are passing that point where everything on Facebook is indistinguishable from crap.

  42. Final exams and sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May?

    Final exams and sunshine? I guess they have those in Canada too. Maybe they just failed to correct for a decline in Internet usage overall. FaceBook is big enough and popular enough that its use pattern should parallel the Internet.

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    Eventually all of these sites will lose users. Why? Because eventually people wake up and realize what a time waster it is. Let's face it, do people really think you're that interesting such that they will follow your exploits day in and day out? It's all a fad and that's what all the paparazzi shows are for on TV for people who are truly interesting, or well at least have "celebrity" status. For those who need their constant Kim Kardashian fix, they can get it daily and there will be media outlets that will supply that need. Can you ever get enough of Kim Kardashian? That's another topic.

    Yes, you can use the truly social aspects of these sites to reconnect with old friends and catch up. But in reality, after a while, you then realize suddenly that there was a reason you lost touch with those old friends. They're boring or they pissed you off a long time ago or they stole your significant other from you. Unfortunately for you, now you've "friended" them. This creates a new social paradox. How do you unfriend a friend and still be able to look them in the eye at that high school reunion? You can't but you can Tweet Dr. Phil and ask him what you should do.

    Facebook will eventually dwindle down to a smaller subset of what it is today. People will give up on the Farmvilles and will turn on to other things. Like "Angry Birds" which I predict will have a $200B IPO next year because we value the latest fad, not what's substantial.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You don't understand what to use it for, so all of us who use it as as tool to improve are lives are the losers?

      You're an idiot.

      "do people really think you're that interesting such that they will follow your exploits day in and day out? "

      Typical fallacy from someone who doesn't understand social media.

      Facebook is as substantial as you want it to be, and I find having a list of people I know who are interested in specific things having a common place to be valuable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can use the truly social aspects of these sites to reconnect with old friends and catch up. But in reality, after a while, you then realize suddenly that there was a reason you lost touch with those old friends.

      Yeah, moving three times during high school and half a dozen times over the course of a decade long Navy career made it hell to keep track of people back when long distance cost real money and your only other recourse was snail mail. The world's a different place today, and I for one am glad it is.
       
      But I would ask that the luddites and socially inept stop trying to turn back my clock. Go live in a cave if the new world bothers you that much, but stop insisting I do too.
       

      They're boring or they pissed you off a long time ago or they stole your significant other from you. Unfortunately for you, now you've "friended" them.

      Well, no I didn't. I'm a mature adult and choose who I friend and who I do not. If they "bored me, or pissed me off", then I didn't friend them on Facebook. I'm selective as hell and have no problems not replying to a friend invite. If you cannot manage this, that's your fault - not Facebook's.

    3. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd say they understand it very well. The world is full of narcissistic people who aren't happy with who they are, so their only outlet is 'social media' and attempting to make themselves better than they are in the eyes of their peers. This really isn't any different than bare fist boxing matches at the bar 150 years ago, and coming out on top for a weekend. I just lasts longer, and burns much prettier.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      so all of us who use it as as tool to improve are lives are the losers?

      To put it bluntly, if Facebook improves your life you are most certainly a loser in every conceivable way.

      If you have a medical condition, or you happen to be a soldier away from home, then its different.

      If you are just too socially inept to function in the real world however, then yes, you qualify as a loser. You'll get a fuckton closer to not being a loser when you stop trying to make excuses for being a loser.

      How do I know YOU specifically are a loser? You responded to his post. It struck a nerve with you. If it didn't feel personal to you, you wouldn't have bothered.

      You responded because YOU think your the loser he describes.

      And that goes back to my original statement ...

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      You don't understand what to use it for, so all of us who use it as as tool to improve are lives are the losers?

      You're an idiot.

      "do people really think you're that interesting such that they will follow your exploits day in and day out? "

      Typical fallacy from someone who doesn't understand social media.

      Facebook is as substantial as you want it to be, and I find having a list of people I know who are interested in specific things having a common place to be valuable.

      I didn't inflect a social stratification in what I said. I merely said that there's a lot of folks on Facebook who are more interested in what Kim K. does or Justin Beiber, sorry I'm not one of those. For those I communicate with and share ideas, Social Media is one form of communication. A telephone is another. I just prefer to do it without having a million "losers" as you call them trying to "friend" me. Sorry if that's so 19th Century but at least I'm using VOIP and sometimes I use this new-fangled software called Skype and I can even use this video thingy to see who I'm talking with. Barring all that I'll use one of my cousin Bubba's pigeons that he has. He collects them from the trash pile behind his trailer.

      It's a cycle, it's been played out before and it will happen to Facebook. We used to have BBS systems, then list servers, then MySpace it's a trend, a fad. Social Media? That's another topic, I was talking about Facebook but if you want to throw Social Media as a whole into the mix, yes, there will be newer, more innovative ways to provide this in the future. It will not be developed by Facebook and it will become the new IPO poster child. Facebook will look like a dinosaur by comparison. That's innovation and you can't stop it. What happens then to your old Facebook? Do you still use MySpace or is that so "last decade?"

      I'm sure right now there's a few people at Facebook who are freaking out because that potential $11B IPO isn't looking so golden after all.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    6. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      I was making a joke, and I'm not advocating turning back the clock either but we've lost something in all this non verbal communication. We've certainly gained a lot more transient relationships to be sure but if I write something that's tongue in cheek, you can't see my facial expression. We have given ourselves a lot of tools that mean we don't have to really talk to one another or see each other. That's a sad fact, so while we have provided new tools to communicate we're losing the old tools, like being Social with one another.

      So, if you like Facebook, by all means use it. It is a *good* way to reconnect, but as you point out there's often people you don't want to reconnect with. Let's see, there's that crazy ex girlfriend and then her third husband.. It just goes on and on sometimes and there's only so many restraining orders one person can get out of a judge.. ;-)

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    7. Re:AOL, MySpace, Classmates now Facebook by spiralx · · Score: 1

      How do I know YOU specifically are a loser? You responded to his post. It struck a nerve with you. If it didn't feel personal to you, you wouldn't have bothered.

      LOL. This from someone who has posted 27 comments in this article, most of which are vitriolic rants in response to people who say they find Facebook a positive thing. It seems that people talking about their social lives seems to touch a nerve with you, maybe if you ever get some real-life friends you'd have a broader perspective on the value of social media. Given the level of anger you display towards people just for using a website though, I can't imagine who'd want to be your friend.

  45. Betty White said it best by defaria · · Score: 1

    I think Betty White said it best when she said "It seems like a tremendous waste of time".

    1. Re:Betty White said it best by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, old rich actors are well known for the insight into new technology~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Betty White said it best by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wow, she's been known for putting stupid crap like this into perspective since well before she got 'old'. She's generally well recognized for pointing out the obvious that no one else has the balls to say even if it makes her look bad or means she's making someone else look bad.

      In short, that rich old lady seems to have a better grasp on the world than you do, you might want to listen to her.

      New technology doesn't make it new, its just a new way to do the same old things. Facebook is really about the same as posting stuff on a church bulletin board 50 years ago. Sure the content is different and wouldn't be something you'd show in church probably, but its not really any different.

      Youd think someone whos been around as long as you have would have JUST a LITTLE bit of wisdom of his own.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  46. Misuse of statistics .... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    Nothing in the statistics comes even close to say people are 'shunning' face book. All the statistics point to is that some people are using it less, or have stopped using it. I still see people I know join up, and no one I know that uses face book regularly has dropped it (anecdotal evidence .. not post it as an overall Facebook trend.)

    I check it at least twice a day (morning and evening), and sometimes at work if time permits. My wife only checks hers every day or so. Different people have different ways they use it. I rarely post anything, some seem to post every random thought that come into their heads. Some have learned how to use the 'ignore post by' button, others haven't and some drop it because of all the noise.

    I've added a motorcycle group that I lead that uses Meetup.com as it's primary communication point. Since adding the Facebook page, there has seen a significant increase in activity in the group. My guess is that since Facebook is 'real time', people can communicate better than when using a normal blog or email. I can't prove Facebook is the reason, I can only correlate the activity.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  47. Garbage In by Cartman's+Mom · · Score: 1

    Facebook is like that kinda hot girl you dated, but quickly realized she was..not so much. I consider her a big fat w**re that blabs everything I say all over the internet. She steals, smokes, and has chronic gas. So now I only lie to her, feed her garbage info and randomly change my profile. I dumped cable over a year ago and have been lying to the bookFace as well. I consider it a fairly annoying inbox, little more.

  48. World of Facecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World of Facecraft - people are getting facade maintenance fatigue.....trying desperately to maintain their false images in real and digital life is too much....or the stark realization that they and everyone they know is BORING....

    "You wouldn't worry so much about what others think of you if you realized how seldom they do."
    — Eleanor Roosevelt

  49. Evercrack by pkinetics · · Score: 1

    Facebook is just the Evercrack for the masses, ie nongeeks

  50. You will not remember Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you will remember EVERY minute you did NOT spend with your parents, loved ones, and friends. They are here such a short time, and you are wasting it on Facebook and devices. Drop that shit and go spend real time with them.

  51. Re:The #1 reason I left FB by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Actually, I find in an extremely useful tool for managing groups.

    IT's a hell of a lot easier to manage then email groups, Especially temporary groups. Like my sons baseball team. A whole bunch of families, friends and what not need to be informed.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  52. Fake accounts being purged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the drop in account numbers is facebook purging fake accounts - accounts that are second or third or fourth, etc, accounts for the same person and used for playing games (i.e. cheating), etc.

  53. Not bad as a way to point people to things. by Shag · · Score: 1

    After downloading all my content from FB (and another blog site, and a personal page at the university where I used to work, and personal pages where I now work), I uploaded a bunch to a blog, gave my friends the URL to it, deleted my account (which had a persistent error anyway), then set up a new account with tight security and far fewer friends (mainly family) where I just post links to interesting things on my blog, and a public page where I post a subset of those links.

    Why? Well, people are gonna see ads wherever they see my content, but on the blog, they see fewer ads and any ad revenue goes to me, not FB.

    I'll happily use FB or any other social networking site to send traffic to my own site.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  54. Hollywood syndrome by geekmux · · Score: 1

    "...felt so much pressure that she decided to rejoin Facebook, and is glad she did. "It makes me feel like I'm a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life as a stay-at-home mother."

    And there's the root of the problem right there, what I like to call "Hollywood Syndrome". Sure, there's probably another word or term for it, but it basically stems around the popularity of such things as Facebook, Twitter, Warcraft, MMORPGs in general, and all that fake bullshit we see on TV that is so popular these days. Don't disillusion yourself people. American Idol has NOTHING to do with singing or finding talent. MTVs the "real" world is anything but.

    Of course, the illusion of living a life well beyond your own is nothing new. Soap Operas have been doing it for the last half-century. My question to the general masses who feel the undying need and urge to cling onto someone or something else to feel "part of something bigger" is...what the hell is wrong with going out and doing something by yourself, FOR yourself? There is no replacement for real-life experiences, especially ones that you do for no one but yourself. Being a stay-at-home mother is nothing to be ashamed or feel shallow about. The fruits of your labor will hopefully be seen when one of the most precious assets in the world grows up. If molding the future is not a part of "something bigger", I really don't know what is.

    1. Re:Hollywood syndrome by iteyoidar · · Score: 2

      "...felt so much pressure that she decided to rejoin Facebook, and is glad she did. "It makes me feel like I'm a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life as a stay-at-home mother."

      And there's the root of the problem right there, what I like to call "Hollywood Syndrome". Sure, there's probably another word or term for it, but it basically stems around the popularity of such things as Facebook, Twitter, Warcraft, MMORPGs in general

      Most of us just call it "socializing" and being part of a "community"

    2. Re:Hollywood syndrome by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I've got to disagree a bit. My wife is a stay at home mother and she'll often get frustrated because her life seems to be confined to our house. She has few friends (mostly people she met via social networks) outside of the home and thus talking to people on Facebook or Twitter gives her an outlet. It's a way to reach out to people with similar interests or situations. Kind of like Slashdot gives us geeks/nerds a place to talk about "News for Nerds." Imagine if the Internet disappeared tomorrow. How many of us would have people near to us to talk to in person about our various geeky interests? To those of you who said "plenty", count yourselves lucky. My answer is "none." Social Networking is just another extension of the Internet's ability to bring people together from vast distances to discuss common (or sometimes opposing) views/interests/situations.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Hollywood syndrome by geekmux · · Score: 1

      "...felt so much pressure that she decided to rejoin Facebook, and is glad she did. "It makes me feel like I'm a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life as a stay-at-home mother."

      And there's the root of the problem right there, what I like to call "Hollywood Syndrome". Sure, there's probably another word or term for it, but it basically stems around the popularity of such things as Facebook, Twitter, Warcraft, MMORPGs in general

      Most of us just call it "socializing" and being part of a "community"

      And what was it called before Facebook? That's my point. Contrary to popular belief for most people under the age of 30, mankind did actually exist and thrive before the Internet, text messaging, cell phones, GPS, and twitting everything you've ever done.

      And I'm sorry, but having 4,372 "friends" isn't exactly what I would call "socializing". That's not friendship, that's a fan club, fed by a shallow need to win a popularity contest. I tend to put a heavier weight and value on a real friendship with things like actual physical connections and real social outlets. Rather difficult for me to really enjoy a cold beer with someone staring at a webcam, not to mention "Big Brother" recording every word. Some things cannot be dismissed under a digital life, yet most people have come to accept that. Rather odd behavior that we've found ourselves pandering to the very devices we supposedly control.

    4. Re:Hollywood syndrome by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I've got to disagree a bit. My wife is a stay at home mother and she'll often get frustrated because her life seems to be confined to our house. She has few friends (mostly people she met via social networks) outside of the home and thus talking to people on Facebook or Twitter gives her an outlet. It's a way to reach out to people with similar interests or situations. Kind of like Slashdot gives us geeks/nerds a place to talk about "News for Nerds." Imagine if the Internet disappeared tomorrow. How many of us would have people near to us to talk to in person about our various geeky interests? To those of you who said "plenty", count yourselves lucky. My answer is "none." Social Networking is just another extension of the Internet's ability to bring people together from vast distances to discuss common (or sometimes opposing) views/interests/situations.

      You bring a solid point, as long as the level of converting ones self to a digital presence in this world is kept at a moderate level. I hate to say it, but "moderation" is not exactly a word used to describe most of the social networking activity out there. If it is this bad with current tech, I hate to see the day the Holodeck becomes reality. Man will never see another man in person again.

    5. Re:Hollywood syndrome by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everyone on Facebook has 4,372 friends and are in some kind of popularity contest. Nice strawman. My Facebook homepage is full of stuff from my real-life friends, who I see in real life. Amazing!

  55. Facebook's not done yet... by iB1 · · Score: 1

    ...but I truly believe that the honeymoon period is over now. From the friends in my list of Facebook, I can see that all of those annoying apps (Farmville, Mafia wars etc.) have started to really fall off now, and I don't see any of those updates anymore. I think that smartphones may have something to do with it. If you can play Angry Birds on your phone, then you don't need to log into Facebook to do a similar thing. Also, I feel that people are starting to get burned by the OTT information that they spew out in their status updates, and are realising that you can't spout inflammatory nonsense without people picking up on it. One of my female friends hates her mother-in-law (and sisters-in-law) with a vengeance. However, they are all still "friends" on Facebook, as it is in that stupid political zone where you can't unfriend with without them noticing and having a go at you for doing such a thing. However, she posted an off-the-cuff comment taking the piss out of them, and all hell broke loose - Phone calls, threats, tears.... all from a throwaway comment that EVERYONE could see. As this starts to happen to more and more people, I think that they'll either: a) Bail out of Facebook or b) Drastically reduce their friend list to all of 5 people. Don't get me wrong. I still like Facebook and do think it's a useful tool, but it's beginning to backfire on people now and that could be a problem for Facebook.

  56. Hipster Facebook by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

    Facebook shunners a tiny minority or part of a growing trend?

    I was shunning Facebook before it was hip to shun Facebook.

  57. It totally has nothing to do with: by The+O+Rly+Factor · · Score: 3, Funny
    • Incessent narcissism 24 hours a day 7 days a week
    • Data protection that is circumvented by the highest bidder
    • Privacy policies that change with the wind
    • Employers using the data to keep track of their peyons^Hemployees between 5 PM and 9 AM
    • Siphoning of data for the creation of consumer profiles by any third party company with an internet connection
    • Non-stop astroturfing

    Nope. Nothing to do with any of those.

  58. Friends, Networking, and Reality by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    It also lets you pick up a few new facebook friends, some of whom get leveraged into real friends or industry connections.

    In terms of the story, everyone seems to be making a big deal out of the fact that its numbers went down by six million--My guess is most of that's the school crowd, who normally are on facebook in class, while doing schoolwork, etc...; summer jobs aren't the kind of environment where people do that. Growth may be flattening, but the decrease likely isn't sustained.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Friends, Networking, and Reality by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that these numbers are still based on the one post of a debated blog that targets marketing people, and uses stats that facebook releases to marketers so that they can target ads, etc. The methodology of the original sources of data is not explained. There is no discussion as to whether privacy modes, ad-block, anything like that might impact those numbers. There is very little analysis as to whether or not there are usage patterns that vary over time with some periodicity. And this is now the what, 4th major article I've read that takes the original blog post from "Inside Facebook", and adds to that absolutely nothing but conjecture and opinion, and a few random personal examples, which everyone on slashdot knows are pretty damned meaningless. I'm getting really sick of this type of article in the tech world - tech journalists should realise by now that it's trivial to follow their sources, and they should be doing a much better job at vetting their sources not just for headline potential but for reasonableness.

  59. Get a clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon folks, get a clue! Facebook, twitter, myspace etc... only exist so corporations can get your personal data for targeting you for advertising! Don't believe that? Read the user agreement you had to agree to to use any of these types of sites. You will see that the site owns any data, messages etc that you post there. What? You thought that these sites provided you with free services out of the godness of there hearts?! THINK AGAIN!!

  60. I got a Facebook account by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    Used it for a while..

    As time went on, I used it less and less each day

    Haven't looked at it for months now

    Guess I'm just not that social...and I have lots of other things to do

  61. Why I wish I used Facebook by nukeade · · Score: 2

    As someone who never had a MySpace or FaceBook account, I'll be the first to say that I should have.

    Back in college when MySpace was huge, I was constantly pestered by friends for my "MySpace", so that they could friend me. My canned response was, "I don't use MySpace, but if you want to find me you can just type my name into Google and my professional website is the first result." Well, guess who didn't get invited to the cool parties because the invite went out over MySpace? It still happens today with friends who use Facebook to send out invitations. You can tell people to use your e-mail, text you, or call you, but it's just not something that people think to do anymore. Facebook has become the preferred means of communication. I've even had a relationship fail out of the gate because the girl preferred Facebook flirting and I refused to indulge her. Just last week I got a call on my office phone from some friends from long ago who'd been looking for me. Since I wasn't on Facebook, it literally didn't occur to them that they could try entering my name in Google and find my contact information at the first result. Instead, by some circuitous route they managed to find a phone number I didn't even know--my office phone--since I just use my cell phone!

    So, here's the moral of the story. To the masses, Facebook is the new phone book, post office and phone. If your address and number is unlisted, you may as well be living in a shack in the vast wilderness, because unless they're exceptionally close to you then your friends aren't going to find you, aren't going to contact you, and might even find it easier not to be your friend at all.

    Somehow, I still decline to use Facebook. I'd rather go through my list of contacts on a rotating basis and send them a text to let them know that I still care. It is kind of funny to meet friends of my girlfriend and have them say, "Oh, you're that guy that's not on Facebook!"

    So, maybe not being on Facebook makes me more memorable after all.

    1. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use facebook but all my friends do so any time an "invite" goes around I'm already aware of it.

      I guess if you never left your room/apartment in college that could have been a problem...

    2. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by Rinnon · · Score: 1

      No no no, you've got that completely backwards. You're listing all the reasons why you should be GLAD you don't use facebook! Those are the reasons I'm glad I never signed up. First off if a "relationship," if you can call it that, didn't work because she only wanted to flirt via facebook, do you really think that was a relationship that was going to last anyways? Is that someone you ACTUALLY want to make your long term girlfriend? I mean sure, if you just wanted to get laid that would be different, but seriously, I feel confident in saying you didn't miss out on anything big.

      The other thing, you aren't being invited to the "cool" parties? So fucking what? It's worth missing out on the "cool" parties to know who your real friends are. The ones who will actually call you to invite you to things. The ones who will make an effort to touch base with you and hang out, just like you'll do the same for them. Facebook is the Internet equivalent of high school friendships. People you can pretend are your friends because you see them everyday and chat about trivial shit. But when push comes to shove, and neither of you are willing to put forward any effort to keep the friendship going (IE: You don't see each other at high school anymore) you know it wasn't really a solid friendship to begin with. Why you would MISS having so many frivolous "friends" is beyond me. They're just filler between the real friendships you have, and I personally don't need that filler.

    3. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those college parties weren't cool, and that girlfriend wasn't a girlfriend.

    4. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who never had an internet account, I'll be the first to say that I should have.

      Back in college when the internet was huge, I was constantly pestered by friends for my email, so that they could add me to their contacts. My canned response was, "I don't have email, but if you want to find me you can just look for my name in the phone book." Well, guess who didn't get invited to the cool parties because the invite went out over email? It still happens today with friends who use email to send out invitations. You can tell people to use your phone, postal mail you, but it's just not something that people think to do anymore. Email has becomes the preferred means of communication. I've even had a relationship fail out of the gate because the girl preferred email flirting and I refused to indulge her. Just last week I got a knock on my door from some friends from long ago who'd been looking for me. Since I wasn't on the internet, it literally didn't occur to them that they could try opening a phone book and looking for my name.Instead, by some circuitous route they managed to find my address by looking on the internet.

      So, here's the moral of the story. To the masses, the internet is the new phone book, post office, and phone. If your address and number is unlisted, you may as well be living in a shack in the vast wilderness, because unless they're exceptionally close to you then your friends aren't going to find you, aren't going to contact you, and might even find it easier not to be your friend at all.

      Somehow, I still declined to use the Internet. I'd rather go through my list of contacts on a rotating basis and send them a letter to let them know that I still care. It is kind of funny to meet friends of my girlfriend and have them say, "Oh, you're that guy that's not on the Internet!"

      So, maybe not being on the Internet makes me more memorable after all.

    5. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Well, guess who didn't get invited to the cool parties because the invite went out over MySpace?

      You weren't important enough for anyone to tell you ... and you think having a facebook/myspace account would have changed that?

      I don't know about you, but I went to parties where I was actually wanted, and someone made an effort to tell me about it.

      Sounds like the kind of parties you're talking about were just popularity contests.

      If you aren't important enough that they would call you or send you an email, you weren't their friends and you weren't worth the invite. Sucks, but thats just reality.

      Would being on facebook/myspace have helped your social life? No. If they wanted you to be part of it, they would have put more effort into asking you.

      So heres the moral of the story: You aren't special and Facebook/MySpace won't change the fact that you didn't matter to those people enough to get an invitation.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by nukeade · · Score: 1

      There was an article on Slashdot a while ago about just that. Namely, that people could handle a relatively small number of close friends, and that social networking makes it very easy to keep in touch with a much larger group of people. Nonetheless, it has no effect on the number of people you can actually be meaningfully close with. So, we're not missing out on any of that.

    7. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by nukeade · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's a remarkably cynical way of looking at things. There are plenty of occasions involving beer and a backyard that people broadcast on their favorite social network without much thought. I'm not claiming to be extremely popular nor particularly important to more than a couple dozen people, but it doesn't mean I can't have fun dancing or watching a campy zombie movie or playing a game of football with people I've met a few times, and it's just those things that being disconnected from social networking makes you miss out on.

    8. Re:Why I wish I used Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, it was because of your sparkling personality.

  62. regret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "It makes me feel like I'm a part of something bigger and more grand than just my life as a stay-at-home mother."

    regret having children much?

  63. But yet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight. We are all ragging on FB about what a time waster it is yet we all seem to have found the time to read and comment on slashdot. On the other hand discovering that all my fellow slashdotters value their time so much explains why no one ever reads the articles slashdot posts are refer to.

  64. Dissatisfaction with Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I rather suspect that most people leaving Facebook are doing so because of the unilateral changes the site has made that are often unpopular. The past two years alone changes have been made to profiles, fan pages, groups, and so on. Right now Facebook is testing a "Happening Now" feature that pretty much does the same thing the Most Recent filter does, but not as well. Sadly, I am one of the victims of the testing. My Most Recent and other filters are gone and my news feed is a mess. It's because of this sort of thing that people are leaving Facebook!

  65. The Canadian Angle by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    The same study suggests 1.5million Canadians also quit in a single month, that's 5% of Canada's entire population quitting Facebook in May. Now, to me that seems pretty odd, why so many, why May? For this to be realistic there'd almost certainly have to have been some good reason why so many chose that specific month to all leave together but I'm not aware of any event that would've caused such a mass exodus.

    Well duh, the spring thaw came a little late and they woke up and left their dens to start foraging for roots and berries. Doesn't this kind of thing happen every year?

  66. Not enough time in the day by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    During the workday I need to work on projects, answer e-mails and such. I'll have downtime for social networking here and there but not much. When I get home, I need to make dinner, get the kids ready for bed and then do various things (household chores, blog posts, watch TV shows I like watching, spend time with my wife, etc). I can do social networking here as well, but my time is limited. I already have a blog and am on Twitter. Going on Facebook would only spread me too thin. If I want to post something for the world to see that's longer than 140 characters, I'll blog about it. If I want to let people know about it privately, I'll e-mail them. There are only maybe a handful of people from my past that I wonder "what are they doing now." The others? Don't really care. As it stands, I'm constantly trying to rise above my past. I don't need people from my past constantly popping into my present life and judging my current life with comments or "likes".

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  67. Could not never figure out facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Before people jump on me, let me make it clear, I am no technophobe, I am mostly on the bleeding edge of technology ... HW or SW

    So ... I could never figure out what facebook achieved that we could do in a email with cc and bcc, seriously. Given that the founder apparently stole the "idea" (which is worthless IMHO) controversy, I was feeling pretty sad that this is what the vaunted Si valley could come up with lately. Classic example is my wife who was a stay at home mom till about a year ago, when she was at home with plenty of spare time, she was a facebook power user, but now that she is back in the IT workforce (she does chip level design) she barely looks at FB and now is on email for most of her communication with friends (personal and professional) and family.

    I know several hundred million people could not be wrong, I for once could not figure out the usefulness or the value of FB (or twitter).

  68. great except for the apps by schlachter · · Score: 1

    I like and use facebook, but the apps drive me nuts. I reject all app requests and remove automated posts to my wall from friend's apps. Wish there was a way to remove all apps.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  69. Duh. It's summer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Web usage always goes down when school ends, the kids are home, and vacations happen. It's been this way for years now.

  70. Nobody uses Facebook anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody uses Facebook anymore. It is too crowded.

  71. Novelty has worn off... by Arguendo · · Score: 1

    I think for most users the novelty of Facebook has worn off. I noticed this myself as well. When you first join, you start getting friended by all kinds of folks you used to know. Your curiosity is very high, and it's entertaining for a while. Then the months pass. Eventually you are rarely friended by anyone new. Most friends that will join and find you already have. And you've already reached out to most you know. Then it's just an endless stream to the same old friends posting about the same old things.

    Still can be useful, but the novelty has worn off.

    I think Facebook's greatest flaw (and Twitter's greatest strength) is that once you hit the roof on your friend list, there are few surprises. Whereas Twitter allows serendipitous exchanges precisely because it is public. Privacy is good - but it won't challenge you as much as openness. And that may get boring.

  72. Email is a better communication tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone that I want to talk to has my email. Those that I don't want to talk to can still contact me easily through my website, which is the first result in most search engines if you search for my name. (Yes, I have the luxury of a unique name.)

    I simply have different email accounts for each family I keep in each area of the world.

  73. Sounds like a Personal Problem by vga_init · · Score: 1

    I have a lot of friends who deactivate their Facebook. Either they deactivate it for a week or a few days and then come right back, only to deactivate it again a couple weeks later, or they deactivate permanently.

    What I see people like this doing is blaming their personal problems on Facebook. I don't study enough for my classes? It's because of Facebook. I don't spend enough time with my family? Facebook. And so on and so forth.

    The problem is that Facebook happens to be an extremely useful communications tool. In some circles I belong to, it has practically replaced e-mail. I belong to organizations that use Facebook to schedule events, hold online meetings via groupchat, and discuss/share important information on group pages. Nothing is more frustrating when you're trying to get legitimate work done, and one of your members decides to go neurotic and deactivate their Facebook because they have a personal problem. Whenever this happens and ask them why they deactivated their Facebook, I usually get some kind of whiny response, to which I inevitably ask, "Why don't you just not log in during the times you don't wish to use Facebook?" Then it's always, "Boo hoo, I can't resist!" Seriously, get a grip.

    The question is, why Facebook? I don't see people "deactivating" their e-mail because they check it too often or spend too much time writing e-mails. I don't see these same people, who will spend hours a day on AIM, deleting their AIM account. Facebook is just a scapegoat because it's new technology for most people, therefore it must be the source of much evil.

    1. Re:Sounds like a Personal Problem by Nukedoom · · Score: 1

      "Nothing is more frustrating when you're trying to get legitimate work done, and one of your members decides to go neurotic and deactivate their Facebook because they have a personal problem."

      That sounds like a personal problem to meeeeeee. And why shouldn't it be? I can see where your frustration would come with people who just decide to abandon their work, because they can't handle their obsession.

      I do think people have legitimate reasons to avoid Facebook, though I agree that it isn't the source of everyone's problems--it is a bit of a scapegoat.

  74. Fucking Hipsters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shunned facebook before it was cool...

  75. Me Too by Nukedoom · · Score: 1

    Recently, I deactivated my Facebook--it wasn't the privacy issues that got to me, but the people. I felt like was becoming obsessed to be a part of something, trying to find a meaningful friendship with another person, but I couldn't get it. To me, that was far more frustrating than the predictable post my friends made or the embarrassing comments that would sometimes come up. I didn't think I was any better than my friends--I just couldn't be meaningful so I said fuck it. It's my fault for believing I could change that. I'll be with people who give a damn.

  76. Asymmetrical value proposition by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    there's a slight value proposition for FB users. They can connect easily with people they've lost touch with. That was fun at first, but I quickly found that the people I've lost touch with I also grew apart from. There's always the "So...what are you up to now?" conversation that iterates twice, three times at most. Then, silence. It's like a high school reunion split up into hundreds of mini interactions and stretched out over years, and it's just as awkward.

    As a sociological study and advertising behavioral resource, it's a gold mine. That's why Goldman Sachs and the usual evil suspects are all over it.

    But in the end, FB and all its peers and predecessors implode because they bring nothing of lasting value to the user. It's just another way to waste time. Invent something that makes me a better mathematician or improves my golf swing or earns me money or teaches me how to lay out a circuit board while I do it, and at the same time have it be entertaining and not bore the hell out of me like a standard text book does, and then you'll be onto something lasting.

    Add a serious level to entertainment or an entertaining level to something serious that taps into that level of absorption, of total focus, and it will be huge for humanity. And no, serious games aren't there yet.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Asymmetrical value proposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are single/separated/divorced it's the mother of all resources for MILF mining. I hooked up with at least 5 via facebook after my divorce, before I met my fiance. Of course now I have no use for it LOL.

  77. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I had deleted my account but signed back in a month later and it was still there.

    Seems it's YOU that never really leave facebook. I deleted all my stuff and never logged in again. I know it's gone because those 'real' friends that I see face to face tell me they can no longer see the pictures or the conversations.

    If you are going to leave..LEAVE.

    sheesh.

  78. Truth or dare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there prove of this or is it something that someone wishes to be true ? How do we know if it is true or not as facebook has denied this ?

  79. New meme... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Think of Facebook as a sort of Turing test.
    If you're active on Facebook, you just failed the test.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  80. Since before it was cool by drcln · · Score: 2

    I've been shunning Facebook since before it was cool to shun Facebook. Am I cool now?

    --
    your gravity fails and negativity don't pull you through
  81. /. poll by synapse7 · · Score: 1

    Why use facebook when their is /.? Seriously, who else does not have, and never created a facebook account?

  82. broader view by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Turns out there isn't any single "correct" form for letters. To think Palmer or D'Nealian Script is "Cursive" with a capital c or to think it is "The Script" for cursive writing is to have a limited perspective. Even within the Palmer method you had variation on letters.

    Find a nice script you like or make your own. Use it carefully when you write. Do it enough with intention and it'll become easy to write and read.

    I think ease or difficulty of reading is what you're referring to when you say "it has always sucked"?

  83. This is my beef with Facebook, too by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    There isn't much of interest that can be said in a mere 250 (or 140) characters.

    Never used LiveJournal, but I was on another similar website that allowed long-form entries - I miss that. It seems like there must be a market for a bloggier version of Facebook.

  84. Facebook access tools by GFLPraxis · · Score: 1

    There's a bunch of useful account security tools that can be used for this. I put people in to groups on Facebook that I can then limit from being able to see posts I make. So I can provide them with the placebo of having added them, but they won't see 90% of the posts I make, so I have no interaction.

  85. Can't you exclude people from individual posts? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    So put up all your pictures from your visit to the local art museum for all to see, and put up your drunken binge photos restricted to just your friends. Problem solved.

  86. you must open an account! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason I opened a facebook account was to try to find my son Jonathan (who never responded) that there is no law in place to force them to delete all of your personal data is the main reason why I stay away for ever after.

  87. Like-Book by enter+to+exit · · Score: 1

    My Facebook wall has degenerated into a massive list of page likes. Hardy anyone posts content anymore.

    I wonder who makes those "Like if you remember XYZ" and "The awkward moment when..." pages and why.

    I originally used my Facebook as intended, i listed my music, books and movies and even filled in a typical "About Me" but I've removed all that now because no one looks at it (Some even treat it with philistine suspicion) and I've reached a point where i only check facebook out of a morbid voyeuristic curiosity.

    On the other hand I've taken a personal interest in the Middle-East "uprising" and i'm surprised at how much facebook has become a household word. I know people in the ME who have a rudimentary understanding of English and no household internet who have an active FB account

  88. Disporia* will win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disporia* will open soon to the public it will be the most secure and Google profiles might be okay until Disporia* opens

  89. Banal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found FB really great at first, it brought folks back into my life whom I'd always liked but lost contact with for whatever reason.

    But after the first 2 years I realized that I was about the only one in my "friend" group who was posting/generating original content (photos, video, short stories, etc.), and everyone else was just commenting, complaining, linking to music and/or political videos, etc., nothing original from them at all, just ... noise to my signal .

    It became too banal, even what my own son was posting (I love titties and beer), and I haven't been back for at least 6 months, and am considering deleting all my data.

    I now post all my "output" on my own website/domain, and if anyone from FB wants to come see it they're welcome to, but I'm not expecting many to make the jump, so really in my eyes, FB was/is a passing fad that will be replaced by the next big thing in about, oh, an Internet second.

  90. well... by jokoon · · Score: 1

    Facebook would have been useful if it had at least tried to make people meet for whatever reason, and I'm not talking about just recreational friendly stuff like parties and dates and whatever stupid "event". The software and database facebook possesses could allow people to find jobs easily, to share cars, to share a dinner between neighbors, to share tedious chores, and to match services when it requires to, etc.

    I really thought about that recently, that those kinds of social software could change the world we live in currently, with the crisis and all this things.

    I'm not sharing more views on those things, even if "ideas are cheap" :p

  91. FB great starting place for shopping! by decarillion · · Score: 1

    I got a FB account because my siblings wanted me to keep up on what my nieces and nephews are up to, 1500 miles away. But, I used a pseudonym (and I'm sure they thought me weird, but I've always kept my real name off the internets), and the only 'friends' I have are my immediate family and their kids.

    My profile contains the books/movies, etc. that I like, but it doesn't contain any personal information, including location/work/school, etc.
    I use FB purity to block most of the bullshit, too.

    I'm a 'fan' of many pages, though--mostly entertainment and retail-related. I've won a whole lot of freebies and books from random drawings, etc. from vendors and blogs that are in my feed. I get discounts and coupons before they are released to the public or even newsletter subscribers. I have no desire to keep up with people I haven't seen in years, especially those from 'back home.'

     

  92. Walled gardens always fail. by CondeZer0 · · Score: 1

    People have not learned anything from the history of the internet, and keep trying to build new generations of the same old walled gardens people abandoned long ago.

    --
    "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
  93. Facebook use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people are spending too much time on their computer!