Slashdot Mirror


News From Apple's iPhone Event

Apple is currently announcing various things about a new iPhone; the CNN Live has coverage as it is happening. Watch for updates as more information comes in. For those of you who like to read instead of watch, PC Magazine is^W was^W is running a live commentary stream (it broke and then unbroke). The New York Times also has a working live stream which seems more reliable. Update: 10/04 19:04 GMT by U L :Unexpectedly, Apple did not announce an iPhone 5, but rather an incremental update. CNet has a decent article about the features of the iPhone 4S. Additionally, all major carriers except T-Mobile will be getting the phone October 14th.

392 comments

  1. Wow by rlthomps-1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Twitter reports that /. has a thread that says that CNN has some info about some iPhone stuff. A marvel of modern communication

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      innit

    2. Re:Wow by recrudescence · · Score: 1

      that's true about twitter ... I read about it on facebook (via email).

    3. Re:Wow by noc007 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let's not forget about Engadget's liveblog as well as the dozens that are out there. I really don't know why Apple just doesn't stream it live; the media can still do their live commentary on how awesome or boring something is.

    4. Re:Wow by DuoDreamer · · Score: 1

      Engadget's servers have been raped. I'm getting nothing but unavailable messages.

    5. Re:Wow by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Epically so. I've never seen Engadget go down under pressure, not on E3, not during any Apple event I can remember, not during any other keynote... Are people *really* that excited about the iPhone 5?

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going up and down fairly gracefully, continue to refresh and it will come up.

    7. Re:Wow by edremy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Going up and down fairly gracefully, continue to refresh and it will come up.

      Am I wrong for finding this vaguely arousing?

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    8. Re:Wow by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      from a PR point it makes sense - it makes it had for you to find exact details - makes people look different places.. also gives the perception that it is larger of an even than it is. (if it was so small then a single source could handle the job easy).

      it's all part of the Reality Distortion Field Effect.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstood. The endgadget servers actually got raped. All that blood and semen clogged up the fans and then the motherboards fried. They'll be down for weeks.

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Nobody gives fuck about it anymore. Just fanbois like you who are trying "really" hard. That's it.

    11. Re:Wow by myurr · · Score: 1, Informative

      And the tragic truth - so far at least it has been a nothing announcement. They've stuck the iPad 2 internals in the iPhone 4 case, and called it the iPhone 4S. Whoopdy doo. Oh and they tweaked the camera a bit...

    12. Re:Wow by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is post-Taco /., so I doubt you're the only one.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    13. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "it makes it had for you to find exact details"

      You're from Boston, right?

    14. Re:Wow by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

      yoohoo!

    15. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep. The thing is over now, so here is the sum total of the announcement:

      1. New camera. Has more megapixels. White balance may no longer suck. (That's the tweak.)
      2. You can now take pictures using the volume up button. (Really? Not with a camera button? Really: double tap the home button, press the "camera" icon, press the "volume up" button. That's "ease of use," apparently.)
      3. Remember how Android has a voice activation feature? iPhone is getting that now. Unlike the old "voice command" this one can now be used to search the web and enter text into text fields. Wasn't this available in Android 1? And as an app for iPhone?
      4. "New" processor (it's the iPad 2's)
      5. "Better than console game graphics." No, really. Seriously! They said that!
      6. Remember how the iPhone tracked your location, and everyone got upset about it? The new one uploads the location to iCloud and this is, somehow, a feature. So you can locate your phone through the cloud. (It's in your house! Thanks, GPS!)
      7. Antenna was redesigned. So you might be able to make calls and browse the web while holding the phone.
      8. Now supports Sprint.

      And that's it. That's everything.

    16. Re:Wow by ericloewe · · Score: 0

      Indeed... Nothing spectacular. Now is the time to laugh at all the fanboys that had already sold their iPhone 4s to buy iPhone 5s, but now have to buy new iPhone 4S (es) Pun very much intended.

    17. Re:Wow by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Now is the time to laugh at all the fanboys that had already sold their iPhone 4s to buy iPhone 5s, but now have to buy new iPhone 4S

      I kinda doubt anyone did that.....all they were expected to do today was announce the phones, not actually sell them. Why would anyone sell their phone weeks before the one they want becomes available?

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    18. Re:Wow by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh and they tweaked the camera a bit...

      This is a big deal. I've been using a Droid X since it came out and despite it having a dedicated camera button, when you go to take a picture, it takes friggin' forever to fire up. Being able to fire up the camera in 1.1 seconds is HUGE. Just think of all the opportunistic upskirts and nose picks you'll be able to automatically post to your Twitter account!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    19. Re:Wow by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      Belly flop?

    20. Re:Wow by demonbug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. The thing is over now, so here is the sum total of the announcement:

      1. New camera. Has more megapixels. White balance may no longer suck. (That's the tweak.)
      2. You can now take pictures using the volume up button. (Really? Not with a camera button? Really: double tap the home button, press the "camera" icon, press the "volume up" button. That's "ease of use," apparently.)
      3. Remember how Android has a voice activation feature? iPhone is getting that now. Unlike the old "voice command" this one can now be used to search the web and enter text into text fields. Wasn't this available in Android 1? And as an app for iPhone?
      4. "New" processor (it's the iPad 2's)
      5. "Better than console game graphics." No, really. Seriously! They said that!
      6. Remember how the iPhone tracked your location, and everyone got upset about it? The new one uploads the location to iCloud and this is, somehow, a feature. So you can locate your phone through the cloud. (It's in your house! Thanks, GPS!)
      7. Antenna was redesigned. So you might be able to make calls and browse the web while holding the phone.
      8. Now supports Sprint.

      And that's it. That's everything.

      So you're saying that Steve left because he was too ashamed to be part of this announcement, and that whole sickness thing was just a coverup?

      Though really I'm not sure what people expected. You know, other than an iPhone 5 instead of 4S. Do you think Apple's marketing department was crapping themselves with all the talk and excitement on the web for iPhone 5, knowing that there would be massive disappointment when they revealed... iPhone 4.1?

    21. Re:Wow by timeOday · · Score: 1

      5. "Better than console game graphics." No, really. Seriously! They said that!

      That is becoming increasingly close to feasible. The XBox 360 was released in 2005, the PS3 in 2006. Let's think about that for a minute. This is the top-selling cellphone in 2005, in all its glory. (cite) Even the 960x640 resolution of the iPhone is dangerously close to current-gen consoles (considering they can't support 1080p very well).

      Consoles aren't behind yet, but the trajectories of the two cross in the surprisingly near future.

    22. Re:Wow by masteroffm · · Score: 2

      i recently picked up a Galaxy S II on Sprint and one of the things that I really love about it is how quickly the camera fires up. while it doesn't have an option to jump to the camera from the lock screen, I keep a shortcut to the camera on my main home screen. I can hit the power button, unlock, hit camera, and take a picture in under three seconds

    23. Re:Wow by multisync · · Score: 0

      The first informative post in the thread, and it gets rated -1 Troll.

      It's really time Slashdot did something about its moderation system (bringing back metamod would be a great start).

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    24. Re:Wow by Toonol · · Score: 2

      5. "Better than console game graphics." No, really. Seriously! They said that!

      Ugh. This pains me. For the next few years, we can look forward to Apple fans repeating this talking point with a straight face.

    25. Re:Wow by dave420 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is a *lot* more to graphics than simply pixel counts! Until a phone can provide as much power as an electrical outlet, it won't happen. Consoles will stay ahead, and phones will lag behind.

    26. Re:Wow by Duradin · · Score: 0

      Actually it'll just be the haters repeating that they keep hearing Apple fans repeating this talking point.

    27. Re:Wow by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you just made me ponder. My nokia launches its camera app when I slide open the lens cap. Took me 4-5 seconds to go from 'phone on desk' to 'new photo captured' - although that included time for the flash to go through its red-eye reduction.

      Compared to the time it takes me to get the phone out of my pocket and out of its case, that's tolerable. Compared to the time it'd take me to use a proper camera (if I had one on me) it's much much faster.

      There's a limit to how many reaction shots I need anyway :)

    28. Re:Wow by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Epically so. I've never seen Engadget go down under pressure, not on E3, not during any Apple event I can remember, not during any other keynote... Are people *really* that excited about the iPhone 5?

      Other sites went down as well. MacWorld died shortly before the show opened. Ars Technica (which contracted with a third party to do the hosting) had periods where nothing made it through (the only option was switch to twitter). The Loop died hard shortly after starting.

      The only one I was watching that didn't have problemts was gdgt. The worst it suffered was the auto-refresh failed and you had to manually refresh.

    29. Re:Wow by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      Not to mention there is a reason iphones and android phones only support OpenGL ES. Constraints on the GPU's (i think :P)

    30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To correct you, the PS3 was released in 2007.

    31. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it'd be "hahd" if he was

    32. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention there is a reason iphones and android phones only support OpenGL ES. Constraints on the GPU's (i think :P)

      No, you've got it backwards. OpenGL ES is more or less "cut down the API to reflect what modern hardware actually does", and that includes desktop GPUs, not just mobile GPUs. Legacy GL is implemented on desktop GPUs with giant, complicated drivers which ultimately generate and compile shader programs (i.e. things which fit inside the GL ES API subset). In other words, emulation.

      For the mobile space where there is little need to support legacy APIs, it makes a great deal of sense to only support the ES subset, so that programmers can't even make the mistake of trying to use the hardware in horribly inefficient ways through API designs which haven't matched the way any GPU works for years and years.

    33. Re:Wow by jkcity · · Score: 1

      you could get more money by selling a few weeks before as it was still the top of the line model.

    34. Re:Wow by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      If I were Steve Jobs, and the iPhone5 was not going to be presented today; what would I have done?

    35. Re:Wow by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Nobody goes to gdgt that's why it stayed up.

    36. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it'll just be the haters repeating that they keep hearing Apple fans repeating this talking point.

      Actually it'll just be the Apple fans repeating that the haters keep repeating that they keep hearing Apple fans repeating this talking point.

    37. Re:Wow by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To be fair, the Siri stuff is really, really cool. And it's way beyond what Android offers. The rest is just updating it to meet modern phone standards, true, but something that takes those kind of natural language queries and integrates them into the whole system is amazing. Check out the segment where he's having it read a text to him, does a schedule query, and then replies to the text - all via voice. (If you go to the Apple website and watch the video, that starts around 77:30.)

    38. Re:Wow by timeOday · · Score: 2

      To correct you, the PS3 was released in 2007.

      According to Wikipedia, it was released Nov 2006 in Japan. The US version, although released later, was not upgraded.

    39. Re:Wow by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Not sure if serious... but for me on, say, my 3GS I have to hit the home button, slide to unlock, put in my access code, find my camera app (which isn't hard, mind), and load it. Even if it takes 1.1 seconds to load the app, the rest of the process makes the matter of a second or two difference mostly irrelevant.

      Probably getting a Samsung Galaxy S II soon.

    40. Re:Wow by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the facebook posts referencing the twitter tweet that reports the /. thread talking about CNN having info on the iPhone.

    41. Re:Wow by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      So it's a slight improvement over what Android's had and probably something that they already have in the works and Apple will try to file another bogus lawsuit against them to inhibit competition.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    42. Re:Wow by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      My Android phone has this in some apps, e.g. Google Translate. It works well in a quiet environment, but if there is a lot of noise or you are in a room with a bit of reverb it fails. Plus you look like a massive cock when using it, worse even than the people who walk down the street talking to their Bluetooth headset.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:Wow by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm an Android fan, but Siri goes way beyond the simple voice-to-text-plus-a-few-commands that Android offers. Watch the video, it's pretty cool: "Remind me to call James on Wednesday morning."

      You do still look like a total douche doing it, but if you're in the car...

    44. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also mentioned that the video will be 1080P as expected but it will also have image stabilization built in. A weak point among phone video. Also stated it will do on-the-fly temporal noise reduction.

      I'm curious to see how this one looks.

    45. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the Siri stuff is really, really cool. And it's way beyond what Android offers.

      No, it isn't.

      OK, here's all Siri is: it's the existing voice control cell phones have had for the past decade, but when it doesn't understand you, rather than just do something random[1], it forwards to their servers and runs a WolframAlpha search.

      That's it. Otherwise it's the exact same voice control that every phone, except the iPhone, has had for ages. I really look forward to being able to listen to and dictate text messages on my new iPhone, just like I was able to do 5 years ago on generic feature phones! This is revolutionary! Yeesh.

      [1] That's the current iPhone implementation. If you ever get a chance (steal a hipster's phone), try it - rather than admit "I couldn't figure out what you were mumbling" it just does something random.

    46. Re:Wow by lordholm · · Score: 1

      What phone did you use that had context sensitive voice control? I have not seen one yet. The only stuff I have seen is voice command like "call mom". If Siri tells you you have received a text with "your mom just texted you", you can reply with "call her". With "her" being interpreted based on the context.

      I would say that it seems that Siri is just plain voice control with wolfram alpha searches and context sensitivity. In my humble opinion, the context sensitivity may actually make the voice control useful.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    47. Re:Wow by lee1 · · Score: 1

      bringing back metamod would be a great start

      What do you mean? I just metamoderated.

    48. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's all part of the Reality Distortion Field Effect.

      Not exactly...
      http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Reality_Distortion_Field.txt

    49. Re:Wow by multisync · · Score: 1

      I just metamoderated.

      Are you sure? Did you actually agree or disagree with a previous moderation, or just click thumbs up or down on the comments?

      I currently do not have "willing to moderate" checked, so I don't know whether or not they have returned to the old system of actually reviewing previous moderations. If they have, I stand corrected with regard to my previous comment. If they are still simply asking people to register their approval or disapproval comments, in my opinion, that's not metamoderation.

      While the new system gives Slashdot a sense of what visitors of the site think of some of the comments, it does very little to identify and address bad moderations. And I think the frequent occurrence of abuse demonstrates that.

      But please let me know if they've returned to the old system. I might make the time to participate in moderation again if that's the case.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    50. Re:Wow by lee1 · · Score: 1

      Metamoderation is now accomplished by a system that takes the form of voting on comments - but the system uses your votes to judge the previous comments' moderation. it's the same thing with a different interface.

    51. Re:Wow by lee1 · · Score: 1

      Also, why are you complaining if you are not even willing to moderate? I'm also not thrilled with the quality of many of the comments and certain tendencies among the moderators, but at least I moderate to try to make it a little better.

    52. Re:Wow by multisync · · Score: 1

      See my previous comment. I don't agree that voting thumbs up or down accomplishes the same thing as the old metamoderation system does. I may not agree with or see value in a comment, but that doesn't necessarily mean it deseverves a "troll" mod, as was the case with the comment I originally responded to.

      The old system asked a more direct and, IMO, more relevant question - was the moderation applied to this comment fair?

      You believe the new system is just as effective as the old one, and you are entitled to that opinion, but I don't agree with it.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    53. Re:Wow by lee1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the new interface allows you to click on a moderation modifier as well as voting '+' or '-'. So you are indicating how you would have moderated the comment, and since the system presumably knows how the comment was actually moderated, it can use your input as metamoderation. It's not exactly the same, no, but seems to be nearly equivalent to the old system, but with a different interface. I think the new design may introduce less bias and do a better job of gathering metamoderation data, since you don't see how the moderator voted.

    54. Re:Wow by multisync · · Score: 1

      I have moderated and metamoderated many times over the years, and may possibly do so again at some point in the future. I don't always have time to read/moderate Slashdot, and rather than have points expire unused, I have unchecked the box so the points can go to others, like yourself, who are willing to give it the time and consideration it takes to do right.

      Given the current system, I don't see it as a good return on the time invested. If Slashdot returns to a more direct way of dealing with moderator abuse, that would go a long way toward promoting my willingness to moderate.

      I'm sorry you feel I was "complaining." At the time I and others pointed out what we believed was an abuse of the moderation system, the comment in question was two hours old, and was rated -1 Troll. Perhaps because we drew attention to the comment, others later moderated it Informative, reversing the earlier abuse.

      Drawing attention to abuses of the moderation system are in a sense a more direct way of "metamoderating." It makes it possible for the inappropriate moderation to be reversed - and the comment seen by people who filter low rated comments - while the story is still fresh.

      If you consider that complaining, frankly, I'll happily do that regardless of whether or not I'm currently willing to moderate. Being willing to moderate doesn't grant you special privileges; everyone is entitled to complain to their hearts content. Whether others are willing to listen to it is up to them.
       

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    55. Re:Wow by multisync · · Score: 1

      That sounds interesting. Maybe I'll check the willing to moderate box and have a look.

      I use the classic discussion system, so I'm not sure all of the features would be available to me. I seem to recall having issues with some aspects of Firehose, but it's been a long time since I used it so I may be wrong about that.

      Thanks for the tip on the modification modifier.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    56. Re:Wow by lee1 · · Score: 1

      I use classic as well; this does not seem to affect the metamoderation or moderation interface.

  2. shocked by w_dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm shocked, utterly shocked. Oh, not about anything in the presentation, I'm shocked that Slashdot actually got this story up when the event was happening and didn't link to a recording three days from now.

    1. Re:shocked by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Give it a couple days, then everyone can scream "dupe!"

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:shocked by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

      Wow! I would have been *very* impressed had the link gone to a recording three days from now. CERN only managed to get the neutrinos in 60 nanoseconds ahead of now.

  3. Live? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe we could wait until the announcement is finished for the story to get posted.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    1. Re:Live? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out hope that they'll wait for the announcement to be finished before they post the dupe.

      I'm not holding out hope that the dupe will actually contain any of the additional information. I'm pretty sure it'll just be a dupe.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Live? by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Because it's, like, live and happening now and stuff...

    3. Re:Live? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Apple fetishists are more than happy to see the reveal in slo-mo.

      To me, Apple product announcements are like Hollywood movie trailers: There's no need to seek them out, they'll be shoved down your throat even if you try to avoid them.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But then I'd miss things like them announcing you can take pictures using the "volume up" button on the iPhone!

      Yep. The "volume up" button. Rather than add a proper camera button like every other phone in existence since cameras were added to phones, you use the "volume up button."

      But since Apple's doing it, it must be intuitive and user friendly! ...Wait, isn't the camera on the same side as the volume controls? So wouldn't using that button mean you have to hold the phone such that you're covering the lens?

      Oh, right, Apple never makes mistakes like that. Instead everyone's just holding the phone wrong.

      No, really, I'm not making this up, they announced that the "volume up" button will be the new camera button. And this was important enough to be the highlight of the talk so far!

    5. Re:Live? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Maybe we could wait until the announcement is finished for the story to get posted.

      Why? Speculation is where all the excitement and fun are (aside finding the flaw, like the antenna one, later.)

      Once I see it has nothing I really need and the price (and plans) are excruciating, I go back to making tea.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:Live? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why? We didn't come here for news, we're here to argue!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Live? by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

      To me, Apple product announcements are like Hollywood movie trailers: There's no need to seek them out, they'll be shoved down your throat even if you try to avoid them.

      something tells me you're not trying hard enough

    8. Re:Live? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      No, the camera is on the back, and the volume controls are on the side. It really takes no effort in particular to use the volume button.

      I've been running iOS 5 beta for a while on my iPhone 4 for a while. You'll note that the iOS 5 upgrade doesn't magically upgrade my hardware, so re-using the volume button on the phone is actually pretty nice. And for the sake of consistency, you may as well use it on the new phones, too. And that means no dedicated shutter button that may actually never be used, or accidentally pressed while someone is using their phone. You won't get a picture of the inside of your pocket.

      I had a Sony camera-phone for a few years, with a dedicated shutter button. The experience isn't markedly better than using the volume button.

    9. Re:Live? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Rather than add a proper camera button like every other phone in existence since cameras were added to phones, you use the "volume up button."

      These are the folks who brought you a music player without volume controls. Why would you be surprised by a camera without a shutter button?

    10. Re:Live? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Apple fetishists are more than happy to see the reveal in slo-mo.

      The other half are the haters that need a few minutes to cook up a rationalization of why each new feature isn't really a big deal. "7x the processing power for a device whose major selling point is the App Store? Pftbt lame."

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Live? by wintercolby · · Score: 1

      These are the folks who brought you a music player without volume controls. Why would you be surprised by a camera without a shutter button?

      It's actually the fact that they removed the volume button on a previous device that makes it ironic that they find a second use for it now.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    12. Re:Live? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I had a Sony camera-phone for a few years, with a dedicated shutter button. The experience isn't markedly better than using the volume button.

      Most phones I've seen use the volume up/down for zoom in/out when in camera mode.

      With a camera using the volume controls for shutter, how do you zoom?

    13. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple fetishists are more than happy to see the reveal in slo-mo.

      To me, Apple product announcements are like Hollywood movie trailers: There's no need to seek them out, they'll be shoved down your throat even if you try to avoid them.

      IOW they are just like your comments about Apple in every discussion about Apple. Or every discussion remotely related to Apple. Or just about anything.

    14. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right! Apple did NOT invent the Smartphone - but they have the most popular Smartphone out there, which is also the most sought-after.
      Apple did NOT invent the MP3 player - but they have the biggest share of the MP3 player market, and the biggest music store online.
      Apple did NOT invent the internet - Al Gore did.
      Apple did NOT invent the personal computer - but they are the only computer manufacturer with substantial share growth right now, and with the highest profit margins. As a shareholder whose net worth has increased GREATLY thanks to their increased worth, I'm ecstatic!

      You? You're just jealous.

    15. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touch controls, duh. Pinch to zoom on the screen.

      Apple doesn't want more buttons, the fact that there are volume buttons at all was probably a compromise between "needing to fumble around for it" and "blind people don't have tactile feedback to find the volume button otherwise."

      The most user-friendly iPods for blind people are the shuffle series. If they really want the iPod nano, iPod touch or iPhone, they're the ones compromising.

    16. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP may be a troll, but only an Apple fetishist would believe that HALF of people are Apple fetishists and that ALL the rest are haters. Or that people with actual real criticisms or who are genuinely unconcerned must be coming from a place of hateful rationalization.

      +1 Inciteful for both the post and the moderations.

    17. Re:Live? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Why? We didn't come here for news, we're here to argue!

      No, we're not!

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    18. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Righteous don't know they're Haters.

    19. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple fetishist?
      Mmm, I like it.....

    20. Re:Live? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      With a camera using the volume controls for shutter, how do you zoom?

      Pinch, or an on-screen zoom bar with touch controls. iPhone 4 has demonstrated this for a while now.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    21. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPU not cpu. They clearly stated *up to 2x cpu power... which isn't that great.

    22. Re:Live? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 2

      Yeah the GPU blows everything else right now out of the water. The A5 is a monster, and deriving the kind of battery life Apple manages out of it with a sub 1500 mAh battery is just amazing. A lot of self-proclaimed technies don't really appreciate the design genius of Apple's engineers.

    23. Re:Live? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      only an Apple fetishist would believe that HALF of people are Apple fetishists and that ALL the rest are haters.

      No one believes that - about the general populace.

      Slashdot users? Anyone who doesn't like the products is absolutely a died-in-the-wool hater. Not much indifference on Slashdot, and I've not seen any for years in regards to Apple. Point me to one message that is indifferent about Apple.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    24. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all those command-line apps for the iPhone will only get a 100% boost.

    25. Re:Live? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's because they didn't do most of the design. The Arm architecture and CPU/GPU designs are not Apple's, they just merged them into a single chip with some on board memory. Pretty much the same way as nVidia, Samsung and Ti have been doing, and with similar performance and power consumption.

      There is a reason the iPad 2 only has a 1024x768 screen, rather than the 1280x1024 or higher on similarly priced competing models. Also don't forget that an iPad can't take SD cards, which naturally require power to operate. When you compare like-for-like there is nothing magical about Apple's hardware, they just benefit from having absolute control over every aspect and making some decisions that their competitor's customers wouldn't tolerate.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    27. Re:Live? by Double+Drop · · Score: 1

      Which of course is totally retarded because using an on-screen zoom bar is horrible for proper tactile control and makes the screen wobble like fuck. Another Apple win.

      --
      WarGear - Risk Everything
    28. Re:Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get the idea that iPads can't read SD cards? Works great with the unpowered adapter I got!

    29. Re:Live? by 666999 · · Score: 1

      the same way as nVidia, Samsung and Ti have been doing

      It's clear (battery life tests and real-world use) that Apple has done a far better job of getting those components to work together than Samsung or any other competitor. It would seem that it's not as simple as you make it out to be to "merge them and add some memory" if all these competing tablets can't run for more than a few hours vs. iPad's 10+.

      an iPad can't take SD cards, which naturally require power to operate

      You are sorely mistaken about SD support. Apple sells a box with 2 adapters, USB and SD, with no power source required other than the iPad's internal battery. In other words, the iPad supports SD.

      Hopefully you're not spreading this lie elsewhere.

      There is a reason the iPad 2 only has a 1024x768 screen, rather than the 1280x1024 or higher on similarly priced competing models

      What is the reason, in your carefully considered opinion?

    30. Re:Live? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's clear (battery life tests and real-world use) that Apple has done a far better job of getting those components to work together than Samsung or any other competitor.

      Actually there are plenty of high end phones that out perform the iPhone for battery life, and that is with Apple's built in advantage of not having to properly multitask. Considering that they control the hardware and software completely, unlike my Galaxy S which runs Android, I was actually somewhat surprised when comparing battery life with some work colleagues revealed they needed to charge up every day.

      Don't forget that Samsung used to make the CPUs in the earlier iPhones too, and then always made sure their phones had a better one which probably contributed to Apple deciding start designing their own (or rather buy a company that could design them and slap an Apple label on it). There is nothing magical about Apple processors.

      all these competing tablets can't run for more than a few hours vs. iPad's 10+.

      The ASUS Transformer and Galaxy Tab 10.1 are both capable of that in real world tests. In fact I don't think there is a single major tablet than can only run for "a few hours". Most netbooks can easily get more than that.

      Apple sells a box with 2 adapters, USB and SD,

      I wouldn't call hanging and SD card reader on the end of a table attached to the flimsy dock connector a way to expand the iPad's memory. Most tablets and phones have an internal SD card slot for permanent use, e.g. my phone has 8GB internal memory and a 16GB SD card in socket under the back cover. In contrast an iPad or iPhone is stuck with the amount it comes with when you buy it, and while Apple charges £100 for 8GB of memory a high speed 8GB SD card costs about £10.

      What is the reason, in your carefully considered opinion?

      Well, actually there are three. The first is that the GPU is not as fast as the ones in some competitors tablets, so the reduced resolution makes up for that a bit. It still doesn't match the performance of some of Samsung's tablets, but it looks like Apple decided to make that trade off to get a slightly thinner case (less cooling) and longer battery life.

      App compatibility is also a big issue. If they upgraded the iPad 2's screen older iPad apps would have to scale and look bad unless they were updated. Unlike their competitors Apple has encouraged apps to design their UIs for a particular resolution, rather than with scaling in mind.

      The third reason is that when there is downward pressure on price from competitors Apple usually installs a cheaper screen in its low end models. Since all iPad 2s have the same screen they all get the lower resolution. This practice goes back to their early OS X laptops which had 1024x768 16bit screens. The only other company that goes for lower than usual screen resolutions was IBM (before Lenovo bought their laptop business), but they never used 16 bit panels, which you may remember caused Apple legal difficulties.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:Live? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't be zooming at all, actually, since it's all done in software, and like most small cameras, there is no optical zoom.

      Take the picture at the normal size and crop it later. All the zoom bar does is pre-crop the image for you.

      Additionally, who zooms WHILE taking the picture? Zoom, then click. The screen wobble problem is a complete non-starter.

  4. One thing's for sure... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sales of ironically overlarge non-functional fashion glasses, skinny pants, and funny hats will concomitantly go up in direct proportion to iPhone 5 sales.

    1. Re:One thing's for sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah; fashion...

  5. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by mr1911 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, Apple has to be a bunch of idiots to drive the smartphone and tablet markets like they do. And everyone who would use such a product is clearly retarded.

    Dr. Bob missed a perfect opportunity to inform us how chiropractic can cure the ills of carrying a giant chip on your shoulder.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  6. Lives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should ignore it because we have lives.

  7. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another day, another dumb Apple product.

    As an AAPL shareholder I don't think they're dumb. :)

  8. OMG iPhone 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG, Steve Jobs' cousin just announced the iPhone 5.

    I can't believe they topped the iPhone 4.

    iPhone 5 is gayer than ever!!!

    1. Re:OMG iPhone 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he announced the iPhone for ass. Which many of us should consider as an option, including both you and me.

  9. Ugh, a report about a future report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I said I wanted faster news for slashdot, it didn't mean (non)news about future news. This post is just an advertisement for CNN coverage of the event rather then any relevant information about the iphone (other then a gathering of useless iphone rumors to make it seem like an actual article).

    1. Re:Ugh, a report about a future report by mrxak · · Score: 1

      People who care enough to read live commentary on the event already know where to find that. I don't understand why we're getting this non-article telling us exactly nothing, when waiting an hour means you could have actual information to report.

    2. Re:Ugh, a report about a future report by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Man, you people are worse than my wife trying to determine where she wants the couch.

      "Over there. No not *there*, there! No I don't like it there. How about over there?"

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  10. Who gives a hoot by no-body · · Score: 0

    on this hype? Best to ignore is all...

    1. Re:Who gives a hoot by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to be having a difficult time with that.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    2. Re:Who gives a hoot by no-body · · Score: 1

      You seem to be having a difficult time with that.

      Not at all... it just gets boring after a while. Reading the headline "ALL EYES ON APPLE" triggered it.
      Looks like crowd behavior what's happening there. Trying to find missing identity in following a hype/crowd and feel good for a while.
      Quite common.

    3. Re:Who gives a hoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, keep telling us more about how you don't care.

      Apparently, you care quite a bit.

  11. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But why oh why must there be a slashvertisement for a media event to build hype and excitement? Whatever the product, let's wait until a few facts can be gleaned and the hype-blurb safely ignored.
    We might as well just demand equal hype for Dr. Bob's iChiropractic iApp for iOS which will iChange your iLife for the iBetter. It would be as reliable and accurate as the typical media event surrounding the launch of a mass-market consumer product.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  12. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. I respect Slashdot for not mentioning this stupid event prior to it happening. I still heard about it from EVERY OTHER FUCKING NEWS SOURCE (including "real news" sites like NPR - what the fuck, NPR? - and niche news sites that have nothing to do with Apple).

    Hey, Slashdot: if you really are upset about Apple suing any phone with rounded corners, maybe you should just give this damned event a pass and pretend it never happened.

    FSM knows I'm trying to, but enough people are telling me about it ANYWAY to make it difficult. Can I have one refuge from the Apple zombies? Just one? Please?

  13. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by neoform · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quick! I need to click the link for the Apple story, then post about how I don't care! This is a great use of my time!

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
  14. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Duradin · · Score: 1

    /. should really be covering that auction of crumbs that fell from the One True Beard of RMS [pbuhb] instead.

  15. Flash on the iPad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, just another crippled product.

    1. Re:Flash on the iPad! by toriver · · Score: 1

      Crippled? Flash is a stop-gap solution. Stop worshiping Adobe like that.

    2. Re:Flash on the iPad! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's hardly "stop-gap". It has plenty of very valid uses that still haven't been bested by any other technology out there. It's not perfect, but then absolutely nothing is. Stop lying like that. :)

  16. Streams are hosed. by Picass0 · · Score: 1, Informative

    It seems to be all of them. Gizmodo, Ars, PCMag...

    A dull event covered poorly. Yay!

    1. Re:Streams are hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It seems to be all of them. Gizmodo, Ars, PCMag...

      So either there is a great amount of people interested in Apple's event, or there is a vast number of Android fanbois trying to censor Apple through DDoS.

    2. Re:Streams are hosed. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      It seems to be all of them. Gizmodo, Ars, PCMag...

      A dull event covered poorly. Yay!

      Well there is one thing to follow - how well Tim Cook fills Steve Job's shoes. Better believe the show is more about the show and how Apple appears in it than the product(s).

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Streams are hosed. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the former

    4. Re:Streams are hosed. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, filling Steve Jobs place, and NOT having a Major announcement is tough. To me it indicates the transition is happening sooner then expected.
      When you have a 'new' guy, you want him to come out and blow everyone away. Instead it was a serious of 'meh' announcements.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. So much for Occupy Wallstreet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the people "occupying" wall street will be queuing up for new iPhones and also to suck Tim Cooks cock. Welcome to capitalism. Also you will be buying cheap made in China plastic "my little pony" toys as well because it's "Bro".

  18. news? by vlm · · Score: 1

    The only place I can find a working text report of whats happening is Mike Elgan who seems to be liveblogging on G+.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  19. My prediction by esocid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple announces something that everyone has already used before, and already exists.
    Audience members applaud, and for some reason people laud it as revolutionary, innovative, and new.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:My prediction by LoonyMike · · Score: 1

      Not really, tha name has just been announced and I assume this is meant to be used in a radically different way than the previous ones. Note that it's called "iPhone 4S".
      Then again, some people might have been using it that way already.

    2. Re:My prediction by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      You forgot the "Lame" at the end of your post.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:My prediction by blackfrancis75 · · Score: 1

      you're so cool and jaded!

    4. Re:My prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple announces something that everyone has already used before, and already exists.

      The problem is that, especially in the cases where a feature already exists (e.g., "Find My Friends" is quite similar to Google Latitude), not everyone knows about that previously-existing feature. It's usually power users or serious fans that know, and such kinds of users are far outnumbered by the general/average users. What Apple does is promote these features in an averageUser-friendly manner in an event entirely dedicated to such; the other vendors either don't do this promotion, or do it as a keynote of a developer's event (which, I believe, average users tend to not sit excitedly at their computer for, unless they're serious fans).

    5. Re:My prediction by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Teach me how to be cool like you!

    6. Re:My prediction by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Just wait 'til he tells you how he doesn't even *own* a TV!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  20. Octoshape Grid Delivery Enhancement? by Relayman · · Score: 2

    Apparently, to get the live CNN video feed, I have to install the Octoshape Grid Delivery Enhancement to Flash. No thanks. If I don't install it, I get the stream starting at the beginning.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    1. Re:Octoshape Grid Delivery Enhancement? by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      I'd install it if they had named it "Octopussy Grid Delivery Enhancement to Flash."

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
  21. Apple's next product. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

    Apparantly apple's next product is the iSuck.

    The iSuck is a revolutionary product- that uses vacuum forces to suck dirt off carpets. Really cool- only $500 for the entry level model. It's amazing how they keep coming up with these brand new ideas.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Apple's next product. by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      +1 ROTFLMAO!

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    2. Re:Apple's next product. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      so it's going to be less expensive than a Dyson

    3. Re:Apple's next product. by gmon750 · · Score: 1

      Sure... and then Samsung comes out with their iSuck clone called "iSwallow". Looks and functions exactly alike, yet takes it all the way down the throat like a true whiner should.

    4. Re:Apple's next product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it would be leaps and bounds better than the current vacuums.

    5. Re:Apple's next product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your saying the Samsung product is better, right?

    6. Re:Apple's next product. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the thing is, a vacuum that leaps and bounds misses spots, see?

      Back to the drawing board for you...

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  22. Oh exploitable by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    "The camera app is now accessible from the lock screen. Double-tap the home button and you can go directly to the camera app, no password or anything required."

    Hmmmm......

    1. Re:Oh exploitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the pics are delivered to iCloud!

    2. Re:Oh exploitable by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      How exactly are you going to exploit it?

    3. Re:Oh exploitable by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of exhibitionism? Apple even bragged about time-to-first-picture.

    4. Re:Oh exploitable by knappe+duivel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The camera app is now accessible from the lock screen. Double-tap the home button and you can go directly to the camera app, no password or anything required."

      Hmmmm......

      what, does your nikon or canon require a password?

    5. Re:Oh exploitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's saves the photo to a temporary location until the device is unlocked.

    6. Re:Oh exploitable by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      How exactly are you going to exploit it?

      I have a few ideas. ;)

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    7. Re:Oh exploitable by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In the age of goatse, I can't think of anything here that's worth worrying about.

    8. Re:Oh exploitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The camera app is now accessible from the lock screen. Double-tap the home button and you can go directly to the camera app, no password or anything required."

      Hmmmm......

      ...yeah, can't wait to see the owners face when he goes to browse his photos and all he sees is my ass...

      muahahahahaha.

    9. Re:Oh exploitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same feature coming to Android ICS, if the leaked video was real.

    10. Re:Oh exploitable by geekoid · · Score: 1

      My nikon doesn't call, and look things up when I take a picture of a barcode.

      Not that the iPhone 4s does, but I would like to experiment with it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Oh exploitable by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      nope...

      But, my d90 also isn't network enabled...and it sure doesn't have any contact information on it...

      I'm not saying that this WILL be exploited, but it definitely COULD be, by someone way smarter than me...

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  23. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss Dr. Bob. So do my subluxations.

  24. For something far more rewarding... by ackthpt · · Score: 0

    Go search youtube for Harry Potter Puppet Pals - Mysterious Ticking / Wizard Swears.

    Ultimately, you'll get more enjoyment there than at watching the Apple stuff show, unless you have $600 burning hole in your pocket and need a new shiny.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:For something far more rewarding... by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      Or unless you like watching people say the name of some product or service, tell you two sentences about that product or service, and then say "and that's [name of product]." If that's your jam, you can't beat watching an Apple product announcement.

    2. Re:For something far more rewarding... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Onion's story was an excellent summary of the event in advance I believe.

      During a highly anticipated media event held today at the Apple corporation’s world headquarters, CEO Tim Cook announced the new iPhone 4S is good and people should buy it. “It’s a good phone,” said Cook, walking out onto a stage and gesturing at a picture of the device projected on a large screen behind him. "It's got e-mail, the Internet, and you can get apps on it. Everybody should get one. It's good." After standing in place for another four seconds without speaking, Cook walked off stage, at which point the houselights came up and all in attendance were asked to please file out of the auditorium.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:For something far more rewarding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the Onion missed the hour of naval gazing. No, seriously, the thing started with like an hour of Apple explaining how they're number 1, despite having a 5% market share. Plus things like how much better Mac OS X Lion is than Windows 7. (What does that have to do with the iPhone? Nothing. But it filled time.)

      So if the Onion article included the hour spent cheer-leading for Apple, despite the overall negative trends in their growth, then it would be an excellent summary. As it is, it covers the last half very well.

    4. Re:For something far more rewarding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the hour of naval gazing"

      So, did they fill the auditorium with naval personnel who did the staring, or was everyone in the auditorium staring at navy stuff?

      Or did you mean "navEl" sharing?

      Spelling is important, it can radically change the meaning of your statements.

    5. Re:For something far more rewarding... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Just since you may not have noticed; the Onion posted this long before the conference itself happened.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  25. And i care because? by tesdalld · · Score: 1

    I do not care, its another iphone...

    1. Re:And i care because? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we just need you to comment on every story on every news outlet to let us know what you don't care about. Perhaps you can start a newsfeed to tell us all the things you don't care about the very moment you don't care about them - or get a Twitter feed to tell us all the items you don't care about enough to not care about.

    2. Re:And i care because? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I do not care, its another iphone...

      Ah, but the rumour is - you can actually make calls with this one!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:And i care because? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      I do not care, its another iphone...

      The fact that you're posting indicates otherwise.

    4. Re:And i care because? by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

      I do not care, its another iphone...

      you do care, you took the trouble to post here

    5. Re:And i care because? by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Actually it looks like it's got on spec-parity with the Samsung Galaxy SII, give or take some software and a smaller screen (which might be a good or bad thing according to tastes). Apparently it's still the old thick iPhone 4 case, when all the leading Android phones got releases with a thinner case last Spring. I'm a little disappointed because an iPhone that doesn't clearly beat the competition could mean that the Android manufacturers will slow down their race to better features.

      The single feature that could rehabilitate this iPhone is this Siri assistant, but It must be really good. It must be also really good at understanding languages other than American English. That could be a great feature or a great failure. I'll wait and see.

    6. Re:And i care because? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Goddamit, can't you trolls at least use the canonical " I could care less " form?!!
      geeze, best practices, people!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:And i care because? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      logically fallacious. You don't have to care about something to talk about it, or even to bring up that it's ho-hum.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:And i care because? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Hasn't Siri been available for a while now? I seem to recall it being an alternative to Vlingo -- which has had it's own virtual assistant product for nearly a year now (on iOS, Android, and Blackberry).

      How does this Siri differ from Siri last week -- and how is it different from competing products?

    9. Re:And i care because? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      The A5's GPU is far superior to the SGS2's.

    10. Re:And i care because? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I didn't do my homework. I thought Siri was something new developed only for the iPhone 4S. I've got Vlingo on my Android phone but I'm not using it. I prefer not speak aloud in public what I can swype on the keyboard. Furthermore the core of Vlingo runs on their servers and I won't give them my toughs. (mmm, either /. or my browser signed me out and it's too much pain logging in an being redirected to the home page. I'll post as AC)

    11. Re:And i care because? by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Do you have source for this information?

      thanks

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  26. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Heh. It's extra funny when you consider that Slashdot is ad-supported and they pay attention to which stories generate more comments.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  27. Cue appleheads by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Cue Apple-Head orgasms following the foreplay that is this long drawn out and annoying event.

    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
  28. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by mr1911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No one forced you to ready the story. You clicked on it.

    So, Slashdot brought you a story you wanted to read, which just happened to be created by the marketing department at Apple.

    You complain about it, but here you are.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  29. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    Whatever the product, let's wait until a few facts can be gleaned and the hype-blurb safely ignored.

    Didn't they have a "Leave one in a bar then send goons to recover it and rough people up" event for this release?

  30. All that for nothing. by Severus+Snape · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well done Apple, you got the whole world's media to have a freekout over an old phone with a new processor (which isn't even really new even). Next step, sell a toaster, label it "revolutionary", sell it rather overpriced and see how many sales you get.

  31. question by n8k99 · · Score: 1

    are they announcing the release of their latest Zune-phone clone?

    --
    For some reason my fountain pen doesn't work here.
    1. Re:question by Yert · · Score: 1

      What's Zune? Isn't it that iPod-like device that failed after 5 years of abysmal sales?

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
  32. iOS 5 available OCT 12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats all I needed to know.

  33. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    >> So, Slashdot brought you a story you wanted to read, which just happened to be created by the marketing department at Apple.

    Exactly, and I as a reader do not give fuck what Apple PR has to say. Slashdot is for technology, not for shills. If I feel so, I can say so.

    Besides, it's funny how your logic is self-defeating. Why did not you just not ignore earlier comment if you did not like it?

  34. FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best antenna evar. Best phone camera evar. FAIL.

    1. Re:FAIL by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Did they really include an antenna? Why has noone thought of this before. Jobs is a genius!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:FAIL by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      It very well could be the best antenna. What other cell phone can switch to a 2nd antenna when your hand is covering one of them? (Oh, I get it. Just because it CAN must mean one or both antennas are deficient in some way. Right?)

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    3. Re:FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how they say it's the best phone camera ever, and they compare it to many phones; but they keep quiet about the only phone whose camera is actually good enough to replace a mid-level point-and-shoot, the Nokia N8. FAIL indeed.

    4. Re:FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a phone, that's a space station.

    5. Re:FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It very well could be the best antenna. What other cell phone can switch to a 2nd antenna when your hand is covering one of them?

      Pretty much any CDMA phone - it's required, actually, as part of the CDMA diversity standard. Apple touting it as "revolutionary" shows a definite level of misleading statements as all CDMA phones - for the last 10+ years - have had the exact same functionality. Even the previous iPhone 4 on Verizon did it.

      When Apple has to "showcase" such a feature that has been part of the standard for more than a decade, and was in the previous phone, you KNOW they are thin on anything of substance for the new iPhone 4S.

  35. Backside Illumination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Iphone 4S apparently features "Backside Illumination" according to this slide;

    http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/iphone5apple2011liveblogkeynote1444.jpg

    Does that mean the same thing in US English as it does here in the UK?

    1. Re:Backside Illumination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the sun's shined out of their ass for years, so it's about time they labelled it as a feature.

  36. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    he has suprisingly quiet lately. is he OK?

  37. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they have a "Leave one in a bar then send goons to recover it and rough people up" event for this release?

    Yep. Which brings up another interesting new feature of iOS 5.

    Remember the whole debacle about how your iPhone tracked you everywhere you went?

    This is a new, built-in, non-removeable feature. If you want to figure out where you left your iPhone prototype, you can just hit the "locate" button on iTunes, and presto, your iPhone's geocoordinates are set out over the Internet! And stored on Apple's servers! And can be automatically shared with your friends!

    Wait, weren't people fucking pissed about this? And now it's a feature?! That can't be removed?!!

    Awesome. At least now we know why the hired Apple cop impersonators were able to find that phone so quickly. (In case you were wondering what this had to do with the parent post.)

  38. The iPhone 4s is 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone 4s is 3G.

    I don't have words....really, I don't. They won't get through on this network.

  39. If apple could suck it's own stem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I see are pictures of, "we're number 1". Yes, we know you make shiny products that the masses love.

    I just don't understand how people love to be in such a gated community.

  40. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

    As an AAPL stockholder, you should be pissed off, as their stock just tanked. Down 3% during this press conference, and it has been steadily going down for the past few months.

    --
    for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
  41. No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by ad454 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A year and a half later, all that they can offer is a slightly better camera, faster CPU, and universal (GSM+CDMA) mobile. :(

    Most people including myself were hopefully for the thinner design, larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen, metal back, NFC, 3D glassless display, 4G wireless data, etc. that were mentioned in the iPhone 5 rumours/hype. What a huge let down. No innovative must have features offer! Definitely not worth an update over the popular iPhone 4.

    It also sucks that you still can't play video podcasts in the iPod Nano like you used to 2 generations ago!

    In fact this entire iPhone+iPod refresh really is a big disappointment for me. I guess Apple does not think that hardware innovation is important anymore! What a great way to disappoint your fans, and have them look at other platforms that at least have some more frequent hardware improvements.

    1. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      The good news is that the original iPhone 4 is now cheaper.

      If you want new features this year, I think October 11 (Google/Samsung launch party) is the place to be.

    2. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Most people including myself were hopefully for the thinner design, larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen, metal back, NFC, 3D glassless display, 4G wireless data, etc. that were mentioned in the iPhone 5 rumours/hype.

      You're in the wrong place. Try the Android section.

    3. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a BSI sensor in there - that's going to be a pretty good low-light sensor. Aside from the little bead of a lens, it's going to be a very good camera. If that's important to you, it's a pretty significant upgrade. 'Siri' looks promising... I don't know, for a 4-->4s level upgrade, not too bad.

    4. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's good news that the iPod shuffle is still there. There was rumors that Apple was dropping it, I'm glad to see they were wrong. It's not improved, but frankly for what it's supposed to do, the shuffle is - for lack of a better word - perfect.

      About the iPhone, it's all about rumors and what's in a name. Remove all those rumors and call it iPhone 5, I see it as a big improvement. The CPU isn't just faster, they've gone from A4 to A5. It also means up to 7 times faster graphics. Better camera that takes better pictures with better colors and 1080p video from a freakin' phone. DSM+CDMA means you can now go anywhere with it.

      What would a thinner design do? Nothing. Larger screen? What will a display that's 0.12" larger really add? Metal back? Just get a metal case. 3D glassless display? It's gimmicks, 3D is not selling (see Nintendo 3DS and the world-wide failure of 3D).

      4G wireless? You're right about that one point. Maybe the current chipsets are too power-hungry for Apple's taste.

    5. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      4G wireless? You're right about that one point. Maybe the current chipsets are too power-hungry for Apple's taste.

      Even with this ... really? Downloads are now available at 2X the speed of the iPhone 4, now up to 14mbps... other than downloading HD video to your phone (not streaming it, downloading it in bulk to watch later), isn't a 14mpbs speed still faster than most of the cel networks can reliably deliver? Its certainly faster than a lot of people's internet access over their DSL/cable modems.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care, I'm still dumping this crap iPhone 4 that I got a couple of months ago for that sweet sweet iPhone 4S!

    7. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by afabbro · · Score: 0

      Apple screwed up here.

      Not because the iPhone 4S isn't a fine phone - it is - but because they setup people to expect a lot more and now they've disappointed them.

      Consumer products 101 is you underpromise and overdeliver, not the other way around.

      Surprising from Apple. And bad timing with Jobs leaving.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    8. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally agree and a lot of folks are taking notice. Just look at their stock price after the announcement. -- down.
      It is also not so much the name as it is the features missing. They used to be ahead of the game as innovators.

      It was a marginal improvement and Apple is starting to slow down on the innovation, by resting on it's laurels....
      It started with the iPad2. Anybody can design a product with a better processor and work hard to match the power. The genius of the product that never came to pass was the retina display. In this product the big let down was no NFC nor 4G. They told us about greeting cards, and voice commands.

      Of course the cheerleader reporters will hail it as the "best ever" and you will still see lines for it on opening day. However, subtle, the keynote was smaller, the presentation lacked the usual oomph.I think now you're going to have the vultures in the android camp and the mango folks beating them out in the next 6 months as the best phone out there. Meantime the competing software has gotten really smooth and matured. The competing apps have increased considerably, and the hardware is better. I think Apple is going to lose market share.

      There is just not enough for folks to wait in line for. Plus calling it 4S reminds everyone it is marginal. and after 1 year waiting.... big let down.

    9. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you're looking for is already present in an Android phone =)

    10. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have bought it if they named it iPhone 5 ?

    11. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by MLCT · · Score: 2

      I guess Apple does not think that hardware innovation is important anymore!

      They do - just very iteratively. Why bring out one new product with new features when you can get there via three intermediaries that you can sell on to the "must have" crowd for hundreds of dollars a time.

      It is Apple tactic No. 1, and Cook is full square behind it. They haven't become the highest value tech company by being nice! Apple are having their cake and eating it - huge profit margins on products that they can "update" by making tiny changes to it and a significant proportion of their loyal fanbase will go out and buy it all over again.

      I also wonder if this was a bit of a dry run for Tim Cook - he can get a feel for the stage walk presenting with a low risk iterative launch - much easier than a high stakes new product launch where he could fluff and cause problems.

    12. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The camera appears to be way more than 'slightly' better. It's 8 mega pixels, has a new 5-element lens, 30% better sharpness, ~30% better auto-white-balance, an IR filter, better color saturation and tone, and also records 1080 HD Video with stabilization and noise reduction.

      The glass back is a good thing, and I don't know anyone who really wants 3D on their phone.

    13. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hardware innovation? where? when? Not on an I-pod or I-phone, hell they haven't had anything hardware innovative since bill gates stole their DOS shell prototype.

    14. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're looking at it wrong.

    15. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went from Android to iPhone and to be honest? I'm glad I did. Not that I think the majority of Android offerings are bad but the Apple offerings are better when it comes down to it. No more wondering about what version of an OS I'm using (fuit loops vs candied clams?) no more reviews saying that an app worked on a Droid X but not a Droid 2. The screen does look better and is a bit easier on the eyes. Not as nice as e-ink but for as much as I really read on it I'll live.
       
      Android is just too fragmented already and I just want something that works. Not to mention that I can pay 2 bucks for an app and not deal with ads. A number of the same apps I had on my Android that I got again for the iPhone cost a buck or two but it was worth it to get away from the ads. What a pain that crap is.

    16. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except it not being a piece of crap.

    17. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by MrCrassic · · Score: 2

      Most people including myself were hopefully for the thinner design, larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen, metal back, NFC, 3D glassless display, 4G wireless data, etc. that were mentioned in the iPhone 5 rumours/hype. What a huge let down. No innovative must have features offer! Definitely not worth an update over the popular iPhone 4.

      While all of this is true, the refresh will still sell like mini-hotcakes. There are the people that jump at any new revision Apple puts out, the people that can finally have an iPhone on Sprint (there are still a LOT of people on Sprint) and the folks that actually are interested in the new features it provides. This will probably be like the iPhone 3Gs release in that its announcement was a bit less bombastic as its predecessor, but still enough of a worthy upgrade for many people.

      The two problems I see with this in today's climate is that (a) it's certainly faster, but not that much faster than iPhone 4 like the 3Gs was to the 3G and (b) Android is a LOT more mature, both technically and professionally, than it was during the time of the 3Gs. It was well ahead of any other phone out there, though they were slowly catching up. The 4Gs, on the other hand, caught up to the Samsung Galaxy S II...and they are about to release a new Nexus phone soon. This is even more pressing given the much wider selection of apps available on the Market and Google's cloud offerings to date.

      The iPhone still has the edge on user experience, but today's (comparably dull) conference left me wondering if that's the only edge they have left.

    18. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by harperska · · Score: 1

      The whole "4G" thing is such a joke. First, there's what the official standards body is calling 4G, which is about 100 times faster than the existing 3G networks, but completely unrealistic to get working in the next decade. So since consumers no longer saw 3G as cutting edge, the networks had to release something called 4G to satisfy the masses. Sprint was the first of the US carriers, using WiMax. Verizon followed by using LTE. Both WiMax and LTE were supposed to be really freaky fast, but in the real world weren't nearly as fast as advertised. So T-Mobile and AT&T realized that they just needed to do a little upgrade to their existing 3G networks to get the same speeds the other two were advertising as 4G, by using HSPA+. So for now, HSPA+ is just as good as LTE or WiMax, any of the 3 technologies can be called 4G since 4G is a meaningless marketing term now anyway, and the iPhone 4S supports HSPA+ and is therefore technically a "4G" phone but without the godawful battery drain that WiMax and LTE cause.

    19. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by atrain728 · · Score: 1

      What would a thinner design do? Nothing. Larger screen? What will a display that's 0.12" larger really add?

      GP cites a 4" screen (like many have been asking for.) Iphone 4/4s features a 3.5" screen. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I think your calculator may be broken.

    20. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple screwed up here.

      Not because the iPhone 4S isn't a fine phone - it is - but because they setup people to expect a lot more and now they've disappointed them.

      Consumer products 101 is you underpromise and overdeliver, not the other way around.

      Surprising from Apple. And bad timing with Jobs leaving.

      You're retarded. Apple set nobody up with any of these expectations, the poster did it to himself by listening to jackoff rumors websites known to publish complete bullshit whenever they don't have anything real.

    21. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by harperska · · Score: 2

      Thing is, Apple didn't do anything to set up expectations, unless you believe the conspiracy theories that all the rumors are planted by Apple PR. Remember, no Apple product exists until Steve or now Tim announces it on stage. Anything before that is merely speculation, and unrealistic expectations are created in the rumor mill echo chamber. It's a trade off really, as Apple has chosen historically to not tip their hand as to what products they are working on. So the rumor mill fills in the blanks with wild speculation. So it's either let everybody know what you're working on and risk competitors beating you to market, or keep quiet and risk disappointment among the fans when their hyped up assumptions prove wrong.

    22. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by mlts · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can put out an unlocked version of the phone. Now, that would be extremely useful. This way, you can use a GSM provider if the CDMA doesn't have coverage in your area, although why two providers for one phone would be beyond me.

      But more realistically, it would make the device extremely useful when travelling without having to pay the insane roaming fees.

    23. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A year and a half later, all that they can offer is a slightly better camera, faster CPU, and universal (GSM+CDMA) mobile.

      Aww, is that all? Sad panda, I guess.

      Most people including myself were hopefully for the thinner design

      Not without killing battery life

      larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen

      Would be nice, I guess, if it still fit in your pocket

      metal back

      Been there, done that, it got scratched to hell and fashionistas hated it

      NFC

      Meh

      3D glassless display

      Good lord, DO NOT WANT

      4G wireless data

      Again, battery life; Apple doesn't make LTE chips and current LTE chips suck juice.

      Definitely not worth an update over the popular iPhone 4.

      Meaning you're not going to break your contract, pay the termination fee, and replace your perfectly good year old phone? I'm sure there are dozens of disappointed pandas just like you.

      I guess Apple does not think that hardware innovation is important anymore! What a great way to disappoint your fans, and have them look at other platforms that at least have some more frequent hardware improvements.

      If you're a specs nerd, you really should have abandoned ship years ago. Meanwhile, Apple will sell gazillions to the iPhone 3GS customers coming off contract who want a phone with more than an hour's battery life.

    24. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by harperska · · Score: 2

      Apple's stock has always taken a dip the day of a big announcement, when the fanboys are disappointed that the hyped up rumors they believed in turned out to be false regardless of how good the announced product really is. But the stock always rebounds and grows once the market realizes that what was released was actually pretty good and forgets about the unrealistic promises from the rumor mill.

      And Apple has always taken a 'less is more' approach rather than a 'cram in all the cutting edge features any geek has ever heard of'' approach. And it has worked pretty well for them as the features they do chose to include they can take time to polish.

    25. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the large screen fetish.
      How do you carry a phone that has a 4" screen without breaking it? Especially if it's even thinner!
      I have a Palm Pre, with an extended battery. It's nearly 7/8" thick, and the screen is only 3.1". I can put it in my pocket.
      Ever since I saw a Motorola Droid X, I've been wondering about how you people do it.
      It's closer to a tablet than a phone. Pretty soon phones will come with carrying cases complete with shoulder straps.

    26. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      So it's either let everybody know what you're working on and risk competitors beating you to market, or keep quiet and risk disappointment among the fans when their hyped up assumptions prove wrong.

      That's true to a point, but a huge amount of interest was getting focused on the idea of a 4" screen. That's a rumor Apple could have reigned in, in the interest of managing expectations, without giving anything valuable to their competitors. It's not like HTC, Samsung and Moto would then hit the breaks on their popular 4" screen phones in order to be more Apple-like; if anything they're probably pretty happy to see that they still have no Apple competition for customers who prefer that size. Hell, screen size is probably something that competitors had a good idea of anyway, just because there was no surge in demand for larger screens from Apple.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    27. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why it's "4S' and not "5"...

      How is this a "huge let down"? This is exactly the same as the 3G -> 3GS update.

    28. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And bad timing with Jobs leaving.

      This is the second time Jobs has avoided presenting new Apple products, it seems if he isn't going to do the address then you know he's avoiding it because the products will be lacklustre.

    29. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      According to T-Mobile, HSPA+ is 4G, so the 4S has 4G. Also, let's not overlook Siri, which looks to be the future of smartphones. IMO, Apple already gave away iOS 5's secrets a few months ago so people are already bored by hearing it repeated at today's conference despite getting a standing ovation last time (and it's not even out yet).

    30. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most? I doubt that. Of all the things on your list, true 4G is the only thing that would make a difference to me. The rest are almost negatives IMHO:

      Don't want it thinner (I lose my 3G enough already).
      Don't want 3D (I've played with the Nintendo 3DS and decided it's not that big a deal) I care more about clarity and viewing angle.
      Don't need a bigger screen: I'm buying a tablet for uses that require that.
      Don't want NFC (I REALLY DON'T WANT an iWallet and can't think of any other compelling uses).
      Who gives a rat's ass what the back is made out of?

      Better camera, better antenna, faster CPU and software to take advantage of it (Siri). These are things that make a difference to my daily routine.

      I think people are butthurt that they predicted a phone called "5" and instead got a phone called "4S". Is this a "but this one goes to 11" comparison? How stupid.

    31. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that Apple research shows that best profit is made by keeping the phone design around for a couple of years. The first iPhone had an aluminum case--which may have been problematic for the signal. They switched the design for the 3G, and kept that same design for the 3GS. The latter was a small iterative improvement over the former, just like the 4s over the 4. They'll probably make more profit on the 4s than the 4 (or rather, they won't be recovering R&D for the design now.)

      Two data points isn't good enough to establish a pattern, but it makes some sense. Next year, they'll probably release the 5 with an all new design, larger screen, and 4G. Maybe NFC, if that starts catching on.

      The truth is, there are only so many obvious improvements to be made in the smartphone game. It makes financial sense to milk as much as one can out of each design and featureset, and to space out your improvements so that you always have people itching to upgrade.

    32. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Sancho · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of people who will buy every new iPhone. But more and more, Apple is selling to people who won't. The low-risk, small-improvements make sense in this context. Every other iPhone is a pretty big leap in one way or another, so every two years, people who stick to that upgrade cycle have a lot to look forward to. Lots of the people saying "meh" have an iPhone 4. I know several people with a 3GS who are looking forward to upgrading, because it's a big leap for them.

    33. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree with all of that, but I think the problem here though was that Apple delayed (or at least appeared to delay) the release, and that people took that to mean that there was something amazing coming that they needed more time to polish. I'm in that group, I figured that perhaps with Jobs stepping down, the longer than historically expected lag between hardware updates, and the apparent addition of Sprint, that they'd break their pattern and go for the gold. That larger screens have been popular on Android phones also led me to think this. In retrospect, it was all incorrect guessing on my part, but I'm far from alone and I think that, while it's not really Apple's SOP to comment before a launch, they may have made a mistake by not trying to manage expectations at least a little. A 4" screen, NFC and "4G" (yeah, I know WiMax and LTE aren't *really* 4G) really weren't crazy guesses to make. Once people were really married to the idea though the 4S, which is a perfectly good incremental followup to the iPhone 4, was almost guaranteed to...well, not necessarily disappoint, but at least underwhelm.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    34. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it had had all those things you mentioned, people would still have found something to complain about. What, it doesn't have a built-in projector, TV reception, finger-print scanning and a colour printer?
      OMG worst iFail evah why did they even bother nobody will buy this and I can't even install Slackware and a PS3 emulator!

    35. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      This, this and more this. I've been holding on to an aging 3G since 2008 (gee three years I must be some kind of backwoods luddite). I am happy with the feature set that's been announced and I'm almost certain to upgrade sometime this month.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    36. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Of course, putting in an A5 chip, nice 3D graphics, a much improved camera w/ 1080p video, Bluetooth 4.0, 14Mbps HSDPA, and AirPlay wireless video mirroring is a bit more than "tiny changes".

      Sounds like a solid upgrade to an existing platform. Actually, sounds more like they pretty much gutted the interior and just reused the case. None of the specs are leaps and bounds ahead of the competition, but many people like their iPhones and this is a nice upgrade for most. The only people who should be whining are the Apple design fanboys who feel the need to show off their new toy to everyone in their local cafe/restaurant/bar/movie theater every 5 minutes.

    37. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      The old iPhone 4 page on apple.com has the option to purchase with AT&T, Verizon, or "Or get iPhone unlocked and contract-free".

      The page with pre-order info on the 4s does not seem to have this option.

      Of course the 4 doesn't have the same flexibility as the 4s with respect to travel.

    38. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Sancho · · Score: 1

      The late refresh is really the big one to me. It smells of them trying to polish a new design. That could still be the case--Apple isn't going to want to reduce battery life or increase heat, but they wanted to put in a more powerful chip and make it a world phone. All of which is something they haven't dealt with in the smaller form factor (or at all, in the case of the world phone feature.) Of course, with a larger screen, they probably would have had more space for batteries. I'm not sure if all of the extra juice would have been required just to run the screen or not. Regardless, they might have had problems getting everything just right with the A5 in the iPhone's form factor. They didn't make a big deal out of the CPU this time around--just the GPU. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if the A5 in the 4s was a little underclocked compared to the iPad2.

      I think 4G was obviously not going to happen for the battery life reasons alone. Apple is also going more data-centric, and with cellular providers capping data left and right, it will be interesting to see what happens when those collide. Apple has shown that it's willing to throw its weight around to get a better experience for its users. I'm hoping that when they go LTE, they'll get exemptions to metered data for their own services. Frankly, without that, I have much less interest in iCloud.

      NFC...that was a big, big rumor. I'm not disappointed that it didn't pan out exactly--I'd currently have no use for it. I don't know, it's kind of a wild card right now, I think.

    39. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      The Shuffle is inferior in almost every way to the Sansa Clip Zip or Clip+.

    40. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone still has the edge on user experience, but today's (comparably dull) conference left me wondering if that's the only edge they have left.

      You've missed the point. That's all they need. Better specs, power, capabilities... Those mean little if they can't be used easily or are hard to figure out. As long as the hardware is capable and powerful enough in comparision, that's good enough. Top it off with great design, clarity and almost effortless ease of use, tight integration with supporting ecosystem, and you have a winner. The end-user consumer might not be able to spell that out that clearly, but Apple has proved that their audience knows it when they see - or use - it.

    41. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Threni · · Score: 1

      > It is Apple tactic No. 1, and Cook is full square behind it.

      With let-downs like this he needs to be careful if it's not going to be "Cook? Cook who?".

      I can only assume the 5 wasn't ready so they had to put out a sort of overclocked HTC Wildfire. "It's got voice recognition, which means you can.." Yeah yeah, been there, it's been on Android for, what, two years now?

    42. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I know several people with a 3GS who are looking forward to upgrading, because it's a big leap for
      > them.

      Let's be honest - pretty much every phone out there is a big leap for 3GS users, what with the tiny, almost monochrome display and piss poor power. The figures speak for themselves - Apple had their day in the sun and now they're playing catch up with the Galaxy S2, Nexus Prime etc. Even the Kindle launch was more interesting than this.

    43. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      You are correct that the peak speed isn't that important but, apparently, (please correct me if I'm wrong) 4G also reduces latency which is hugely important.

      Here is a comparison between ATT 3G and 4G which shows that latency in 4G is about 30% lower (50ms vs 70ms).

      This impacts browsing in a very big way for browsing, VOIP and Videoconferencing, online gaming and so forth.

    44. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by green1 · · Score: 1

      let's not overlook Siri, which looks to be the future of smartphones.

      If their only revolutionary selling point is a feature that the competition has had for several years... doesn't bode well..

    45. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm..

      - New processor (much much faster)
      - New wireless chipset (GSM+CDMA)
      - New Camera
      - New antenna design (no more grip of death?)
      - Probably more memory, more battery power, etc etc

      Aside from the screen and the exterior design, what didn't they upgrade? (i'll just answer that for you, the version number)

      I'm looking forward to seeing how well their Siri speech system works. If its anything as good as they're saying it is, i can't see why this is not a complete gamechanger. I'm skeptical though, we've been promised to speak to our computers for a long time, i went into AI because it felt like the future was right there to grab, can it really be, is the future there now? It sure would be cool :)

      I've got a 3S, and i really didn't feel the need to upgrade to the 4, but now i'm very tempted again. They'll of course come up with an iPhone5 next year with some decent new hardware features, but i have a feeling i'll be waiting for the 5S when they ironed out the kinks of that to upgrade at that time.

    46. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by boreddotter · · Score: 1

      It's been like that with Apple rumours since forever... you are always disappointed at the announcement.

    47. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people including myself were hopefully for the thinner design, ...because 9.3mm is just SO THICK...

      larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen ...so we can confuse our muscle memories, either reduce our resolution or send our App Developers back to the drawing board, and make the phone fit in even fewer pockets than it does now...

      metal back ...for improved lack of signal strength, and shinier smudge marks...

      NFC ...for, y'know, those NFC things that are really catching on like wildfire...

      3D glassless display ...so your iMessages can hover above the screen and give you headaches...

      4G wireless data ...so that you can get slightly faster torrents in half a dozen cities, and cut your battery life in half...

      that were mentioned in the iPhone 5 rumours/hype

      I don't know what rumours you were following, but the ones I saw had more or less discredited all of the points you raised.

    48. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Apple works very hard to cultivate an image, and leverage online hype very effectively. So in that regard, they dropped the ball.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    49. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Did you for even a second believe most of those rumours?

      4" display? That'd imply changing to a lower dpi display to keep the resolution of the iphone 4 (which they would be quite unlikely to do -- the display's a strong selling point!), or, much worse, keep the dpi and increase the resolution, and break the nice resolution arrangement that exists right now, with the newer devices being exactly twice the resolution of the older ones.

      It's also pretty obvious from the 3DS that the glassless 3D idea is a gimmick that doesn't push devices. Plus it'd require developing the 3d for apps, that'd further fracture the developing effort.

      NFC I thought was a possibility, if somewhat forward for Apple's style. I can't recall them being early adopter for any tech at all in the last few years. They're usually either pioneers or late to the game, but 4G was definitely a no-go. There's no such thing as a well-defined 4G standard, there's only a handful of competing technologies. I'm pretty sure Apple will only join in on the 4G party once the dust has settled on a more global scale.

    50. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jelly? I bet you wish you could sell so much shit for so much money!

      You mad ... ain'tcha?

    51. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Webz · · Score: 1

      Sense of entitlement much? Why don't you try designing and implementing the world's greatest phone, see how far you get.

    52. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the possibility that iPhone 5 has been delayed due to their current patent war vs the world. I'm sure Samsung would have been quick to file injunctions. Maybe the existing agreement for the iPhone 4 included the possibility of another 4 model (just like with the 3GS), so 4S is covered under existing agreements.

    53. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all they've got left is a edge on user experience -- you know, that tiny little aspect of phones that users actually interact with. What a meaningless edge.

      (And that's not Apple's only edge. It has the best camera, antenna diversity, best battery life, best voice control, best cloud...)

    54. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      3G -> 4S is a bigger upgrade than many considering this who are on 3GS or 4 - the 3GS upgrade path is reasonable one, the upgrade from 4 much less distinct, but one that's hedged by those who didn't like the current design (like me). The design might be selling like hotcakes, but that doesn't mean everyone likes it - and some of us got our hopes up with rumors of a redesign.

      Yes, yes, Apple didn't promise anything, but nonetheless it left this presentation a little underwhelming.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    55. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      I think you nailed it in your first line.

      "A year and a half later" - its not 2 years yet since the last big update. Most people who bought an iPhone 4 are still on contract.

      Better to wait until all of those people are ready to buy a new phone, and then launch the iPhone 5.

      Unfortunately for Apple, everyone knows this - so the iPhone 4S was really just a fill-in. Why did they need a fill-in? If I had to guess I'd say its because Android 4 launches in a week from now, with the Samsung Nexus Prime (or whatever it will be called). They needed something to tie the users over...

      The greater news will be when iOS5 gets rolled out soon...that's what Apple should be pinning their hopes on. New hardware is nice and all, but was it needed? probably not - the iPhone 4 coped just fine. But the new features in iOS5 sound good, and the earlier iPhones get them too for free...

      Have to wonder if this was all a bit of a misstep for Apple. It wont hurt them, sure, but one wonders if it was even necessary? The problem Apple have created is that the hype always preceeds their events - and if their products dont live up to the hype, then people get disappointed. How will they prevent this happening again?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    56. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Any phone manufacturer can do an update like this in just a few months.

      I'd say this is just a fill-in device until the iPhone 5 arrives next year (when all the iPhone 4 users are out of their 2 year contracts). With a big Android release around the corner, they needed something to keep the fans happy - and this was it.

      Just an observation - do you agree?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    57. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by kimvette · · Score: 1

      If all it offered was a larger screen and more storage (64GB or 128GB) I'd be upgrading on Oct 14. Unfortunately, just the larger 64GB capacity isn't enough to convince me to upgrade.

      Dual core? I don't use the iPhone for 3D gaming since the ui is cumbersome. I like 2D games on it (Angry Birds, World of Goo, and so on) so the upgraded graphics chipset and CPU don't impress me much. For GPS navigation, looking things up in Safari, and so on, it's plenty fast with the single core processor. If I am not multitasking, leaving it on standby/sleep mode brings the charge down only 20% over the course of a full day, so battery life is fine for a phone. And of course, the single core processor is fine for actually using the phone as (gasp) a phone. As far as the 8MP camera goes? It has a tiny lens, so small snapshots are fine - and f/2.8? On a 1/4" sensor, the depth of field is still immense, so it still produces images that look like a camera phone or very low-end P&S camera image. If I need high resolution photos, I'll use my DSLR instead. My iPhone 4 does pretty much everything the 4S will do, albeit slightly slower - well, except for Siri, which is a cute feature but not a "must have." Heck, even my old 3GS did most of what I need.

      I'm sure some Apple worshippers who already have the iPhone 4 will upgrade to the latest golden calf. I'll wait for the larger screen, unless my iPhone irreparably breaks in the meantime.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    58. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      A year and a half later, all that they can offer is a slightly better camera, faster CPU, and universal (GSM+CDMA) mobile. :(

      It would seem that they felt that's all they needed to do to the thing. The original iPhone 4 was still selling well and I suspect they felt that the market wasn't demanding massive changes.

      Most people including myself

      You personally know "most people" and polled them?

      were hopefully for the thinner design, larger edge-to-edge 4 inch screen, metal back, NFC, 3D glassless display, 4G wireless data, etc. that were mentioned in the iPhone 5 rumours/hype

      The rumors that we would get such a device today were rather tenuous and it's been quite a while since many believed it would happen. Now, instead of a gearhead, think for a moment like a business. If they delivered all of the above today, what would be left for next year? Would you instead twelve months from now bemoan that the 5s didn't offer massive changes/improvements?

      No innovative must have features offer!

      The Siri stuff, if it works, isn't innovative enough for you?

      Definitely not worth an update over the popular iPhone 4.

      Some of us have older phones. I've been nursing my 3G along waiting for this to pop, and now it has.

      It also sucks that you still can't play video podcasts in the iPod Nano like you used to 2 generations ago!

      That's a bit of an abrupt product jump, but ... the Nano is like 2 square inches of display -- and you want to watch *video* on it?

      In fact this entire iPhone+iPod refresh really is a big disappointment for me.

      So you'd be happier if they hadn't refreshed the products at all???

      I guess Apple does not think that hardware innovation is important anymore! What a great way to disappoint your fans, and have them look at other platforms that at least have some more frequent hardware improvements.

      What do you expect? Earthshaking redesigns every three months? Do you really toss your phone and buy a new one that often?

    59. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would a thinner design do? Nothing.

      Thin designs have been the hallmark of apple product announcements, yet suddenly it's a non-issue when they fail to create a thinner device. So 'thin' is great when they do it, but when they fail 'thin' is a useless feature.

      Larger screen? What will a display that's 0.12" larger really add?

      You obviously fail to realise how much extra screen area that results in.

      Metal back? Just get a metal case.

      Yeah and why worry about an aluminium body on a laptop, just get an aluminium case.

      3D glassless display? It's gimmicks

      Yeah i agree with that.

    60. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by exomondo · · Score: 1

      So it's either let everybody know what you're working on and risk competitors beating you to market, or keep quiet and risk disappointment among the fans when their hyped up assumptions prove wrong.

      But the things people were expecting are things that are already on the market not things where they would have to worry about competitors beating them, Apple's PR should have managed those expectations somewhat given they knew the device would be below the cutting edge of the industry in particular aspects, as in screen size, NFC and radio (and yes in many aspects it does still define the industry cutting edge, like screen resolution).

    61. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the iPhone 3GS is free, FREE!!! I tell ya! Just like those free androids, but better!

      Imagine a free new iPhone from Apple, with the very latest and greatest iOS 5 and rapid updates! FREE!!! (maybe they are giving 2 for 1 too..)

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20069641-1/how-well-does-ios-5-run-on-iphone-3gs//
      (iOS 5 runs very well on 3GS)

    62. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Any phone manufacturer can do an update like this in just a few months.

      Exactly. It's just Apple playing catch up to Android.

      I can only assume the iPhone 5 wasn't quite ready for a high profile demo. Shame they're going to miss christmas. The prime, galaxy sii etc won't.

      Maybe next year? Of course, there'll be new Android phones then too...

    63. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wasn't very surprising as it was what they did with the 3GS. It takes time to get a brand new design right, why drop it now if you can wait a year to make it perfect and still have everyone chasing you when it comes to overall user experience.

    64. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest - pretty much every phone out there is a big leap for 3GS users, what with the tiny, almost monochrome display and piss poor power.

      Almost monochrome screen? Are you at all grounded in reality?

    65. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Thing is, Apple didn't do anything to set up expectations,

      You're right, but Apple certainly has the power to dampen expectations, leak to favored journalists, etc. It's not like they didn't know what people were expecting.

      Their iron-clad policy of "no comment" did not serve them well here.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    66. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by Threni · · Score: 1

      I put my HTC Desire next to a iPhone 3gs. You have to try and politely not laugh at the shitty, small iPhone screen with its washed out colours.

      Perhaps you have some difficulty with your eyesight, though.

    67. Re:No iPhone 5, just iPhone 4s by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read that link? The technology mentioned in that very article, HSPA+, is completely supported by the iPhone 4S. Here's another link from the same site that backs up the speed claims.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  42. And... by Petersko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cue dickheads making derogatory statements about iOS device owners for no good reason other than an assumed - and misplaced - feeling of technical superiority.

    1. Re:And... by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      misplaced? Android has had pretty much every technical feature before the iPhone.

      so, no not misplaced.
      http://techthirst.com/?p=414

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:And... by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      misplaced? Android has had pretty much every technical feature before the iPhone.

      so, no not misplaced.
      http://techthirst.com/?p=414

      I was expecting some nonsense in the comments for this story but the parent getting modded Insightful takes the biscuit. Given that the iPhone was released before Android how has it had pretty much every technical feature before the iPhone?

      Ah, I get it. Google have used their massive computing power on the faster than c neutrino problem and gone back in time to change history.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    3. Re:And... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      While I could have been more clear, if you had read the article you would have understood what I was saying.
      Yes, the iPhone was first, but after the android came out, Apple has been following.
      Android and Stereo blue-tooth first, multitasking, good notification, and many others, listed ni the article.

      So I apologize about not being clear, OTOH, that doesn't excuse you being an ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  43. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by mr1911 · · Score: 1

    Because I own pharmaceutical stock, and you just popped another blood pressure pill.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  44. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by mr1911 · · Score: 1

    He was injured in a horrible chiropractic accident.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  45. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Duradin · · Score: 1

    Great, now tanked is like bricked.

  46. Apple Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.apple.com shows access denied - oh no!

  47. Augmented Reality gets closer to existence by Scowler · · Score: 1

    This 4S phone might have the horsepower and usability to pull it off, at least some of the basic augmented reality applications?

  48. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Your right... They should be a site that that consolidated tech based news across web to cover such things such as new product releases of technology.

    Perhaps we should name it after some some part of a basic mainframe commands but obscure enough to to keep some people out. Maybe DividePeriod.org

    Lets face the facts Ladies and Gentlemen...
    Slashdot is a tech web site... Apple is the big name in tech... Information will be spread to the site.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  49. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by atrain728 · · Score: 1

    Apple is the biggest (technology) company in the world. Thus, it's product releases are going to be covered by (technology) websites everywhere.

    I feel dumber for having to explain that.

  50. Apple Disappoints -- Again by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    So Apple disappointed us with no iPhone 5 in June. Now 4 months later they disappoint again with a warmed-over iPhone 4S that might be worth getting if you have no iPhone at all, but not get locked into a new upgrade contract otherwise. Meanwhile there are multiple Android LTE choices available. Has Apple lost their magic and now just wants to squeeze out every last dollar as long as the current iPhone continues to sell? Or is Apple showing the inherent weakness of one company against everyone else when it comes to innovation. Even in the best year(s) there was only one iPhone model to choose from.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by SlowGenius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was one, and only one mega-fail here. It didn't happen today. It happened when Apple made their announcement of "Let's talk iPhone" and then failed to keep expectations within line. Everybody has now been buzzing about the dual iPhone 4S/iPhone 5 announcement for the past couple of weeks. Without an iPhone 5 announcement to be made today, Apple needed to kill that rumor DEAD. Instead, they've managed to totally underwhelm the world with a new product launch for a fine incremental update for something that would have looked fairly decent if examined in its own light. Mr. Cook, I'm sorry to inform you that you just flunked the oral portion of your CEO marketing exam and that the board is likely soon going to be announcing your imminent departure from the top spot. Nice knowing you.

      --
      Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
    2. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by hoppo · · Score: 2

      Is this really any different than Apple's strategy all along? Come out with a phone, and make incremental improvements each year. Every other year (except for 1-3g jump) has been the major refresh mark. If you come out with a majorly new product each year, you stand to alienate your customer base -- the majority of customers will balk at feeling pressure to refresh their devices every year. This puts people on a 2-year track, which also coincides with the term of carrier contracts.

      And face it, Apple has never attempted to cater to the device geek market, except maybe with the very first iPhone (and that's a stretch). Instead, they have focused on enhancing features that are important to everyday use, often centering around a single aspect. In this case it's battery life and form factor. It may be lacking 4G, but you will make it through the day on a single charge, without having to do much, if anything, to optimize battery usage. And it will fit pretty comfortably in your pocket.

      That's been Apple's MO with all their products -- make consumer-grade devices that do the important things well, and leave other competition for the early adopters. I like a lot of the Android phones, but I wish one of them would take a similar strategy and make them accessories as opposed to focal points -- take a break from cramming new features in and turn attention to gaining energy efficiency and making the things smaller.

    3. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      lnstead, they've managed to totally underwhelm the world with a new product launch for a fine incremental update for something that would have looked fairly decent if examined in its own light.

      Lets wait and see what the world thinks rather than the handful of rabid fans and trolls who were obsessively scouring the interwebs for unconfirmed iPhone 5 leaks and rumors. Although, come to think about it, the rumor sites have been accurately predicting the 4S for the last couple of weeks, so I don't know who is really that surprised.

      This is far from the first time that Apple have failed to deliver the fusion-powered, unobtanium-cased ubergizmo predicted by rumor sites - they haven't gone bust yet.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    4. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but jobs is already weak. only jobs knows apple and if jobs is weak, apple will be weak.

    5. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I base my product evaluations entirely on whether the version number goes from N to N.1 vs. N to N+1. It's a goddamned VERSION number folks.

      Sheesh, the antifanboi-ism is almost as insane as the fanboi ranting. I'm a 3g owner that has waited far too long to upgrade in part because I was hoping for a worthy webOS working-grade phone (not some pixie whosit). To me, they've said the 4s improvements are: faster better camera, better antenna (the 4's antenna is a dealbreaker where I've tested it), good cloud integration, better chip, better battery life, and voice-driven functionality. It sure smells like the rumored iphone 5 from where I'm sitting. Better, not a slam dunk win over new droids, and enough to make me mildly want it, in spite of my techno-tinkering ways making me more of an android kind of user.

      Oh, and it stuck with same form-factor, meaning docks and protective cases and other accessories won't set me back as much as the phone itself. That's a big damn deal, IMHO.

    6. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was one, and only one mega-fail here. It didn't happen today. It happened when Apple made their announcement of "Let's talk iPhone" and then failed to keep expectations within line. Everybody has now been buzzing about the dual iPhone 4S/iPhone 5 announcement for the past couple of weeks. Without an iPhone 5 announcement to be made today, Apple needed to kill that rumor DEAD.

      Why?

      Instead, they've managed to totally underwhelm the world with a new product launch for a fine incremental update for something that would have looked fairly decent if examined in its own light. Mr. Cook, I'm sorry to inform you that you just flunked the oral portion of your CEO marketing exam and that the board is likely soon going to be announcing your imminent departure from the top spot. Nice knowing you.

      What did Apple do in this kind of situation with Jobs at the helm, time and time again? They kept quiet.

      That's what they do. It's who they are. Expecting otherwise is dumb. Saying that Apple's board is going to dump Cook because he didn't do a very un-Apple thing and spoil the announcement by talking about it ahead of time is, well... it's amazing that you got modded to 5 Interesting rather than -10000 Wholetsthisguytypeontheinternets.

    7. Re:Apple Disappoints -- Again by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      So, you assert that Apple should have changed their entire strategy and designed / had manufactured a whole new hardware platform because of some lame-ass rumor started a month or two before the announcement?

  51. Antenna switching for transmit/receive? by Scowler · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain that a little more? Is that really unique or not?

    1. Re:Antenna switching for transmit/receive? by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

      I heard someone in the office say that the claim was 2 antennas make it communicate twice as fast.
      The sad thing is, people will believe that, many people.

      --
      Nothing to say here... move along
    2. Re:Antenna switching for transmit/receive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a fix for the "antennagate" issue with the original model 4.

    3. Re:Antenna switching for transmit/receive? by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      It's that there are two antennas. It's how those antennas are used. Not sure how they are doing it yet but they are claiming 14.4Mbps which is twice the speed of the iPhone4.

    4. Re:Antenna switching for transmit/receive? by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a radio-head, so I don't know what you get for using two antennas each for 1/2 duplex instead of one at full duplex; but I cannot imagine it's twice as fast, or everyone would be doing it.

      --
      Nothing to say here... move along
  52. Apple must be getting hammered by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    This is the longest I've ever seen their website down. Come to think of it, I've never seen it down before.

    Whoop, it's up. That was a solid 10 minutes at least.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Apple must be getting hammered by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      When I go to http://www.apple.com/, I get an "Access Denied" message. It works if I go to http://www.apple.com/iphone/, though.

  53. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by gmon750 · · Score: 2

    Nonsense... this just shows your cluelessness. If you want a stock that does nothing but go up, then I have stock in Unicorn Inc. I'll sell you.

    Fact: AAPL has been consistently going up for ages now. They have a great lineup now, and for the foreseeable future. They have a ridiculous amount of cash on hand, and time-and-time again the bitching of /.'rs preaching the "Apple is doomed" mantra has been proven wrong.

    So it goes down 3%. BFD! Considering how high my AAPL holdings have gone up since I bought a bunch more - during the 2008 meltdown - ignoring the whining and bitching from folks like you about wasting my money, I am quite happy with the current level and after phantards like you finish your weekly anti-apple propaganda, the stock will continue to lead the industry. Continue ranting, I'll continue cashing in. Buh-bye...

  54. www.apple.com down? by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

    First time I've seen Apple's website go down (as opposed to the store) - someone messed up when updating the store perhaps?

    http://www.apple.com/
    Access Denied
    You don't have permission to access "http://www.apple.com/" on this server.
    Reference #18.47efd4d9.1317755036.25f60c38

    Anyone else seeing this?

    1. Re:www.apple.com down? by djlemma · · Score: 1

      I got the same thing.

      Apple "slashdotted" itself I guess. That, or maybe anonymous is up to some tricks...

    2. Re:www.apple.com down? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's down for everyone.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:www.apple.com down? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yup. But the individual links work (ie, http://www.apple.com/iphone/)

    4. Re:www.apple.com down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen the access denied error before on other sites. I believe the issue is with their CDN (akamai). The other sites I had the error with used the same CDN.

  55. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite an underwhelming event, huh? Did anyone really think Apple would come out with something that would (as the hype suggested) drive its owner to the airport, babysit its kids or defend against a home invasion?

    Truth be told, the 4S represents a nice evolution of a pretty darn good phone. No more, no less.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, your views are not consistent with the hive mind. It's not a "5" so no matter how awesome the feature set, it's a disappointment /sarcasm.

      Personally, I think they should have announced the iPhone 8 today just to beat everyone to the punch.

  56. Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn, the bitterness and whining in here is epic! You ponies are just the most fun I've had in eons.

    Quick! More posts about how you can completely profile a human being you have never met down to their last minor psychological trait based on what smart phone they use. That shit is hilarious!

    1. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Scowler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's pathetic, isn't it. In the Slashdot of old, there would be a lot of people dissecting the new features, especially Siri and the new camera, comparing those features to competitors (objectively), maybe explaining the prior art or comparative products that exist. There would still be a lot of criticism, but by and large most of it would be of the objective kind. The slashdot of now? A bitter cesspool of trollish negativity.

    2. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the new internet.
      In case you have not noticed, "half" the world is on the net which means the number of morons out here quadrupled as well.
      Try to read the comments section on your favorite news site, you will understand what I mean...

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    3. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      Well, here it can be fun to watch people traffic in stereotypes (and weird oxymoron ones, like mainstream hipsters).

      On news sites it's depressing because there is discussion of actual important issues, as opposed to what gadget someone watches their German BDSM porn on (not tat I know about any of that, no sir, not me). On the Right sites it's all "Obama am teh anti-Jesus" and on the Left sites it's all "If your child shows any desired to be a businessman, kill it immediately, for it is evil, and unclean in the sight of Gaia."

      And, yeah, I know I just picked on using stereotypes, but my two goofy examples are not *that* far off the mark for some sites.

      My favorite this month was some women hating on the new My Little Pony for making the ponies "slim and sexy" and wanting to know where the fat ponies were.

      "Eaten by wolves because they can't run as fast," I responded. They were not amused. :-)

    4. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long have you had the Oedipus fixation for?

    5. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      An evolutionist answer never flies in those situations.
      To be honest, I am more disturbed by making ponies sexy than slim...

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    6. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and I'm a PC.

    7. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Well, that was their words. They just look like cute overloaded cartoon animals to me. It's those anime eyes, I think.

    8. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Should you be mod +1 funny. or -1 romanticizing the past?

      Seriously, its ALWAYS been like this. Except it was Star Wars Rage 12 years ago instead of Apple Rage..cause, really Apple was almost out of business then.

      Take a look:
      http://web.archive.org/web/200012171146/http://slashdot.org/articles/98/11/11/1050224.shtml

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by hovelander · · Score: 1

      OUTSTANDING!!!

    10. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You think that was an evolutionist answer? seriously?
      Pretty pathetic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A bitter cesspool of trollish negativity"

      You, my dear sir, are brilliant. In addition to providing valuable commentary on the state of slashdot, you simultaneously provide a perfect example of the very behavior that you are commenting on. What better way to help elucidate the problems you see plaguing slashdot than by providing a excellent counter-example for others to learn from!

      Brilliant I say. Simply brilliant

    12. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the internet?

    13. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be old here.

    14. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all fairness, there are like 3 new features. The old slashdot would have had a very brief discussion indeed.

    15. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Slashdot now illegal in New York?

    16. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, nostalgia! It's almost never as you remembered it. But what do I know, Slashdot has always been the way it is now. Before, it was about non-Linux users being morons.

    17. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Scowler · · Score: 1

      One single novel feature often generates a thousand posts.

    18. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Scowler · · Score: 1

      I think it's worse now. People, back then, came here in large numbers; and a large enough portion of them used the moderation system to good effect. A +5 insightful post truly was insightful, for example. That does not really happen any more, and I think that's why slashdot readership fell off a cliff, and why Taco ultimately left.

    19. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by Scowler · · Score: 1

      Kind of true, but the statement is also accurate and intended to spur some self-reflection on the part of some of the posters here. I would characterize my post, in entirety, as a lament, not a trollish critique.

    20. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      I also get tired of mentioning the A5's GPU is extremely powerful compared to every other device out there. Shrinking the iPad 2's SoC into the iPhone's form factor and maintaining or even improving battery life from the previous iPhone is really amazing.

    21. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Seriously, its ALWAYS been like this

      No, it has not. Even the Microsoft hate (which was sometimes out of line) was more tame than what you are seeing against Apple these days - mostly because back then people would be hating on Microsoft mostly on technical merits, rather than just pure hate.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    22. Re:Pass the popcorn and chocolate rain by nloop · · Score: 1

      I remember more Natalie Portman, Grits, and First Post personally.

  57. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

    It was about $50/share when I bought some 4-5 years ago.

    I'm not complaining.

  58. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    He had a bad sublaxion that caused him to accidentally post under his real username, outing himself once and for all as an above average troll.

    RIP Dr Bob, you were as entertaining as you were frustrating (which, thanks to /. moderation isn't really saying all that much).

  59. it is clear who is a not current CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Releasing a product that looks exactly the same means no one will upgrade. i-boys and girls have a need to manifest to others that they have a newer better phone - now they will have a phone that looks the same. Companies need to manage expectations before product releases - Apple is going down.

    1. Re:it is clear who is a not current CEO by Scowler · · Score: 1
      Sometimes car companies iterate on their products with only incremental updates to the styling, but with significantly better interior features and under-the-hood improvements. Casual auto customers don't always notice, but enough enthusiasts exist out there that these kinds of updates *can* be worthwhile.

      The smartphone marketplace is not as mature as the automotive one, but in the end the same customer dynamics are likely to exist.

    2. Re:it is clear who is a not current CEO by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      Just like nobody upgraded to the 3GS right? This isn't a new pattern for Apple. Nor will it be!

    3. Re:it is clear who is a not current CEO by hovelander · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this up, please.

      Today is an interesting intersect of how Apple releases products, media boredom & follow on, and Jobs leaving. Awful lot of hype building up to an imaginary iphone 5, and then this collective letdown because it looks the same and isn't a new number.

      Kind of funny, really.

    4. Re:it is clear who is a not current CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Releasing a product that looks exactly the same means no one will upgrade. i-boys and girls have a need to manifest to others that they have a newer better phone - now they will have a phone that looks the same. Companies need to manage expectations before product releases - Apple is going down.

      Yeah, because Apple's success was all built on getting a tiny number of fanatics to upgrade faithfully at every product release -- oh wait, no, no it wasn't.

      You haters are so predictable.

  60. Apple site is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.apple.com is down. Hmmmmm /. with out getting ./ed

  61. Unexpectedly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... everyone with any ability to read between the lines knew there'd be no 5 today. That teardrop design would be stupid for gaming and landscape view. No hardware for that 5 design has been seen in the wild, while loads of leaks of an updated 4 body have. All rumours about the 5 seem to have stemmed from one case manufacturer.

  62. shoe's on the other foot now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, wait! That sounds like some sort of evil P2P media pirating app! This is just screaming for TPB! get hacking boys!

    1. Re:shoe's on the other foot now! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i have to use octoshape with something i enjoy on weekends that is streamed, Truth be told, i really like it

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  63. The iPhone Force (4S) by qpqp · · Score: 1

    Best model name as of yet, IMO.

    1. Re:The iPhone Force (4S) by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      I was a fan of the iPhone 3Some.

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
  64. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by harperska · · Score: 2

    Actually, I'm not surprised at all, and kind of wish the fanboys who are raging that the new phone doesn't shit rainbows and have a '5' in its name would sell off more of their stock and depress the value even more so that I can afford to buy some AAPL for myself.

  65. Kinda sucks... by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

    Not sure I understand the business reasons fully for not allowing T-Mobile to carry the iPhone 4S. If there was any carrier who really needs this phone they are the ones who need it most; especially in light of the fact that there is no guarantee that the AT&T / T-Mobile merger will occur. Perhaps its just sour apples on my part, since I really was hoping to finally move away from my Blackberry.

    --
    Regards,

    MBC1977,
    1. Re:Kinda sucks... by Lifyre · · Score: 2

      You could try Sprint? I'm not saying they're better (in fact from my experience there is a good reason they're failing) but you could get the iPhone without dealing with ATT or Verizon.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    2. Re:Kinda sucks... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      My take is that T-mobile not getting the iPhone is probably a good indication that the merger will happen since AT&T already has it.

      --
      this is my sig
    3. Re:Kinda sucks... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      It's still stupid for them to not support 1700MHz uplinks. Even if AT&T *does* buy T-Mobile, it's not like they could instantly absorb all of their customers into AT&T's existing 3G network overnight without making life suck even MORE for existing AT&T customers. If the iPhone 4s phones sold by AT&T supported 1700/2100 (AWS) UMTS, and AT&T closed the deal, they could instantly add T-Mobile's existing 1700/2100 HSPA+ sites to AT&T overnight with little more than a PRL update.

      That said, is the iPhone 4s physically INCAPABLE of 1700MHz uplinks, or is it merely not CERTIFIED for them? I find it hard to believe that Apple has somehow managed to buy millions of WCDMA baseband processor chips that are LITERALLY silicon-incapable of 1700MHz operation. Personally, I suspect the iPhone 4s's bare-metal hardware is perfectly capable of 1700MHz AWS, but won't be submitted to the FCC for certification as such unless the AT&T merger falls through.

    4. Re:Kinda sucks... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Plus, what does AT&T do with all the 1700MHz phones floating out there? Do they offer to replace smartphones that might be only a month old?

      If they cut off 3G/4G service then that is breach of contract (I PAID for 4G service!) - and now their leading-edge customers are free to change carriers. They at least need to make a decent show of offering that service until the contracts run out.

  66. CLEAR PROBLEMS with iPhone Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this explains Job's resignation. You don't hold a special event for software called iOS 5, then fail to produce the iPhone 5 that goes with it. I'm guessing Job's bailed as soon as it became clear to him that Cook was unable to deliver the iPhone 5 on schedule.

    This will create a lot of problems. I have an old 3GS with newly cracked screen. I really need an update and love my iPhone. iPhone 4S it is - but while I might normally max out memory, I'll do that next time -- since that seems to be the clear imperative here - not yet, not yet, wait a few months...maybe less than a year even... then you'll have a device you want and can hold on too for a couple of years. If i can make it a year on 16 G, I probably should.

    What does that mean for carriers? I wonder if they aren't pushing some of this? The late release means an inordinate number of customers are off contract and can change carriers. So now we get locked into a 2 year deal before we see the iPhone 5 - and the carriers get a boon in sales when so many upgrade to the real new iPhone 5 handset next year. It's a double whammy windfall likely good for all of them. Not so good for consumers though.

    I doubt this had much to do with it though. I just think Apple failed to deliver. It didn't beat the street - it didn't even surprise the street. It just missed.

    Oh, and Tim - you're CEO. You're the one that unveils the flag ship products - like you're proud of them, NOT your assistants.

    1. Re:CLEAR PROBLEMS with iPhone Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't take long after Jobs to go into a failure mode. Competition shells out a new beefy dual core phone once a week (literally) and all they come up with is the same model with the updated chip and more flash (and software feature that's locked out on older models?). It's very probable that the IP5 was delayed due to production problems. 4S was meant to combat Android in lower price segment but was unexpectedly promoted to a flagship product. I guess they were so much certain about making it with new model, they didn't plan for possible design tweaks to 4S.

    2. Re:CLEAR PROBLEMS with iPhone Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this explains Job's resignation. You don't hold a special event for software called iOS 5, then fail to produce the iPhone 5 that goes with it. I'm guessing Job's bailed as soon as it became clear to him that Cook was unable to deliver the iPhone 5 on schedule.

      You have no idea how product development works do you?

      Also, you don't seem to have noticed, but Steve Jobs is not a healthy man. Everybody with two brain cells to rub together knows exactly why he stepped down. A guy like that doesn't leave the company at the peak of its success because of something so minor as one botched product intro... which isn't even botched, that's just insanity invented in your own mind because you had unrealistic expectations. There never was an iPhone 5 project which could have been introduced today. The rumor mill was full of shit as usual. Deal with it.

      This will create a lot of problems.

      No, it won't.

      I have an old 3GS

      The 3GS was exactly what the 4S is: a speed / features bump of the old model, plus new software. You bought one, didn't you? People will buy the 4S. The world will not end, fire will not rain from the sky.

      I really need an update and love my iPhone. iPhone 4S it is - but while I might normally max out memory, I'll do that next time -- since that seems to be the clear imperative here - not yet, not yet, wait a few months...maybe less than a year even... then you'll have a device you want and can hold on too for a couple of years.

      You're stupid. In one single year Apple is not going to be able to bring out an iPhone 5 which will blow away the 4S so badly that it'll be a must-buy. The iPhone 4 didn't make all you 3GS owners upgrade, did it? No? What could Apple possibly introduce in 1 year that would be that compelling?

      Here, I'll give you the easy prediction: The iPhone 5 will feature an "A6" CPU based on the next iteration of CPU and GPU from ARM and Imagination. It won't be twice as fast. It will feature at least one additional data radio standard. It will probably have an external redesign, because Apple will have gotten enough life out of the iPhone 4 case design.

      All of these things were true of the 3GS->4 transition. It didn't make you buy a 4. The 5 won't make you abandon your 4S. Stop being stupid.

      The late release

      How is this a "late release"? How do all you crazy ass rumor-swilling idiots decide that something which had no announced release date is "late"? Just because some loser website trolling for ad impressions says something is late doesn't mean it is actually late. Get a clue.

      So now we get locked into a 2 year deal before we see the iPhone 5 - and the carriers get a boon in sales when so many upgrade to the real new iPhone 5 handset next year.

      I've got a dose of reality for you: Most people don't upgrade their iPhones every year. Apple doesn't do its product release cycles based on any expectation of selling you one new phone per year. Stop acting as if this is the way the whole world works. The number of people with _that_ strong a "gotta have it" jones is vanishingly small compared to the tens of millions of phones Apple sells. You are a clear example, you numbskull! Not even you, an obvious gadget freak, were willing to jump from 3GS to 4 as soon as the 4 was released.

      Oh, and Tim - you're CEO. You're the one that unveils the flag ship products - like you're proud of them, NOT your assistants.

      More stupidity. Those "assistants" started progressively taking over onstage product intros and demos ever since Jobs' health issues began. It was an easy guess that the guys who seemed to be good at it and wanted to do it would continue to do so. Cook doesn't seem to have that in his personality, so why put him up there?

      It is not sane to expect Apple to replace Jobs with

  67. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by wintercolby · · Score: 1

    Wait, this is /. Do you mean to tell me someone actually read the article and they didn't even apologize for it?

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
  68. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

    Some people would call this a "buying opportunity".

  69. iPod Classic Lives! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they did not axe the iPod classic. Maybe they will reward the faithful with a quiet upgrade to 320GB since 320GB 1.8" drives have been around for a couple of years.

  70. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Fanboi fail!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am laughing so hard right now. All tyou crApple fanbois were wettng your knickers in anticipation at a new iHaveNoPenisPhone, only to be capped on from na great height.

    But that is what you get from worshipping at the altar of Jobsientology.

  71. bad mod, not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fanbois must be in effect... that was not a troll post, informative, not troll

  72. So Not a surprise here people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, was it a big huge improvement? No it wasn't. Rumours are Rumours, not facts. I have a rumour that the next iphone will come with a Kleenex dispenser to wipe away your tears...

    I have an iPhone 4, and I highly doubted 99% of the rumours. larger screen? please... the iphone is already big enough. the rumour I was rooting for was for the iPhone Mini. a smaller screen, a smaller package...

    As for whether Apple thinks innovation is important or not. look at the history. even with the iPhones, the first iPhone was released, then the 2G was released, not much improvement other than a bit of hw improvements. then the iPhone 3G came out. and there was much rejoicing huge huge upgrade! wow!. a year later they released the iterative 3GS and there was much poo-pooing about the lack of commitment to innovation. then the next year the 4 came out. Ohh ahh... Retina Display! fancy! Big upgrade! yay Apple does care about innovation! A year later the 4S comes out, boo hiss... come on really? you couldn't anticipate that? It's the same reason the iPad2 wasn't a huge upgrade. The iPad 3 will probably be a bigger upgrade than the 2. This this their upgrade cycle, and every single time it's a surprise it seems.

  73. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

    Sure, no stock goes up forever. But as you point out, AAPL has been consistently going up for ages. This has resulted in many people considering the stock "overbought". So if you bought stock in 2008, you should take your money now, deposit 95% of it in a savings account and gamble 5%, e.g. on shorting Raiffeisen or Commerzbank. As that will probably be good for your assets, and AAPL probably sees some downward adjustments during the next few months, you can buy even more AAPL for Christmas! (Disclaimer: Don't trust random internet people with your finances.)

    --
    for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
  74. As I always thought by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    An iPhone 4 is for Shiat

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  75. Siri makes it worth about any price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine, don't be impressed by the better camera that can record 1080p @ 30 fps. Don't be impressed by an up to twice as fast cpu that still gives plenty battery time. Don't be impressed that you can use the phone anywhere on the planet now that it has gsm and cdma. I'm sure there are other phones that do all this, and maybe even better.

    But, me, I'm buying this phone on day one, just to get my hands on Siri. If it works only half as good as in the demo it is a game changer for me.

    1. Re:Siri makes it worth about any price by narcc · · Score: 1

      Siri isn't new. It's been around for a while now. I haven't checked, but I'll bet you can still get it on iTunes for your iPhone 4.

      There are also alternative products that do the exact same thing for iOS, Android, and Blackberry.

  76. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    RIP Dr. Bob.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  77. But they promised me a pony! by bledri · · Score: 1

    Despite all the nerd rage that Apple did not deliver on all the random rumors posted by those not in the know, it's a good phone and they'll sell like freakin' hotcakes.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  78. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Idbar · · Score: 1

    And they are actually very smart. Since there are SO many expectations on the iPhone 5, and they don't have a fully cooked product, they will be releasing an iPhone 4S.

  79. unexpectedly? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    IT was know there wouldn't be an iPhone 5 anouncement. This isn't surprising at all, in fact it's was expected.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. One important announcement by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    One thing that I believe is important: even after today, the 3GS is still sold by Apple, it is now the cheapest available IOS5 device. This means it is still supported for another year.

    Good news for all the 3GS owners.

  81. it's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iOS 5 on iPhone 4S is great! That's because it's kind of like an Android phone of about a year ago.

    Now Apple just needs to patent all the features they copied, then sue everybody, and in a year or two, they will be considered to have innovated all those features.

  82. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    As an AAPL stockholder, you should be pissed off, as their stock just tanked. Down 3% during this press conference, and it has been steadily going down for the past few months.

    Sigmund Freud could probably explain it better than I can, but if you bought AAPL a few months ago, you are up quite a bit.

  83. Crap comments :( by Potatomasher · · Score: 1

    Wow, to think I came to slashdot in order to have an informed discussion about Siri, the seemingly impressive voice recognition tech. Nope, all fanboys. Slashdot definitely ain't what it used to be. :-\

    --
    A million monkeys and this is the best sig they could come up with...
    1. Re:Crap comments :( by bledri · · Score: 2

      The only comments I've seen regarding Siri claim that Android has had it for 2 years now. If they are talking about about voice recognition to dial numbers and play songs, then Apple has had that for years as well. If Android has had conversational, contextual voice recognition that seamlessly integrates all the core apps plus external information sources allowing the user to speak naturally, then a lot of marketing dweebs in several companies should be fired because I've never heard of it.

      Anyway, I can't wait to see how Siri works in the real world. If it works even half as well as the demo, it seems like a big deal to me. As in "killer app" big. Truthfully I was confused by the audience's staid reaction, I don't think understood how awesome the potential of it is.

      Yeah, I sound like a fanboy.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    2. Re:Crap comments :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The invention is now I can say "Do I need an umbrella today" and you would get the weather forecast. This is so much better than the old established way everyone else does it where you have to say "weather" to get the weather forecast.

      With Siri.. "I'll be going to lunch about 1:30 today with some clients, will I need an umbrella or just a light jacket?"

      Without Siri. Weather 20006

    3. Re:Crap comments :( by narcc · · Score: 1

      If Android has had conversational, contextual voice recognition that seamlessly integrates all the core apps plus external information sources allowing the user to speak naturally, then a lot of marketing dweebs in several companies should be fired because I've never heard of it.

      Vlingo Plus Personal Assistant for iOS, Android, and Blackberry.

    4. Re:Crap comments :( by bledri · · Score: 1

      ...

      Vlingo Plus Personal Assistant for iOS, Android, and Blackberry.

      Interesting, I didn't know about Vlingo (or Siri) before the Apple announcement. Vlingo looks pretty powerful, as I haven't used either I can't compare them. I think Apple including this as a standard part of the phone's functionality out of the box is a big deal. Maybe Google will more tightly integrate Google Voice into Android itself, or maybe they'll buy Vlingo to counter Apple's purchase and integration of Siri.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  84. So its an incremental update? by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    How is that any different from all previous iPhones, Android phones, desktops, etc?
    Are not all upgrades incremental? Otherwise it would be a new product.

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  85. Its NOT the iPhone 5 - its just Brian - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously - Apple WILL BE working on the iPhone 5 - and it will come.
              and if Google announces the Nexus prime and ICS on the 11th - with like an HD screen and dual core CPU
      It wont be streets ahead of apple - no great game changer or anything....

      and then if the iPhone 5 comes out sometime next year (6 months maybe ?) with quad core and some real unnexpected innovation they will be way ahead again.
        and the quad core hardware is nearly there I gather... and who knows what else they are working - they take their time and do produce game changers...
        (having said that - I dont like the apple walled approach - Im an adroid man myself so I dont mind if this prediction is wrong !)

  86. Rumors fooled you by MikeMo · · Score: 1
    All the stuff that you were expecting was pure speculation and rumor, nothing from Apple. It appears that the blogosphere and the rumor sites are responsible for your disappointment, not Apple.

    Beyond that, it seems to me that a dual-core CPU (and GPU) is much more than just a "faster CPU". That, plus a dual-mode, spatial antenna, 8MP backlit sensor, 5-element lens, all in the same package with essentially the same battery life is pretty remarkable, especially at the same price. That plus iOS5 makes this a non-trivial update. It's at least as big an update as the 3GS was over the 3G.

    AND, don't sell Apple's implementation of Siri short until you give it a good look. Cnet is a good place to start. It's WAY beyond voice recognition. It requires the A5 CPU.

  87. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by geekoid · · Score: 0

    Knee jerk much? he never said Apple was a bunch of idiots.
    Nor did he claim anyone was retarded. That's all you.
    He just finds Apple products to be 'dumb'.

    In many respects they are dumb.

    Stop trying to make it an issue.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    define biggest.
    I consider IBM and MS to be far bigger. as in, more stuff more places.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. there might be others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens is that Apple invents a concept, then every other manufacturer gets on the bandwagon offering the same basic thing, but with bigger graphics, faster processor etc, then boasting about how good they are.

    So enter the 3GS and the 4S, to catch up with the copycat's platforms, while Apple are meanwhile busy inventing the next market paradigm.

    I call it the "Copy Apple" cycle: we saw it with the Mac, the Mouse, the iPod, the smartphone: Apple synthesizes a new technology (perhaps from existing tech, but that's neither here nor there), every body else jumps on the bandwagon, but all they can do to differentiate themselves is offer faster CPU, more graphics, a mouse with more buttons, whatever: it's the same copied Apple technology.

  90. The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple.com was down due to some sort of DNS attack after the announcements. All you could get was an "access denied" error.

  91. iPhone 5 isn't ready becasue by geekoid · · Score: 0

    it's a huge step. Due to certain government receiving complaints about Apple advertising and media scope, they were shone a prototype.
    It was recorded, And since this is the internet, here it is:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ihKhH1dSJU&feature=related

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:iPhone 5 isn't ready becasue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An impressive fake but a fake nonetheless. Holographic display? Riiiight.

  92. Which is why... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    my 3GS I have to hit the home button, slide to unlock, put in my access code, find my camera app (which isn't hard, mind), and load it.

    That's why in iOS5 they added the camera to the lock screen. so you don't have to do anything but hit the home button, then the camera button.

    You'll even get that on the 3GS on the 12th... startup time will not be 1.1 seconds though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Which is why... by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      That's why in iOS5 they added the camera to the lock screen. so you don't have to do anything but hit the home button, then the camera button.

      Doesn't that leave you rather open to anyone who picks up your phone taking pictures with it? Look forward to your photo album being full of pictures of balls when you get back from the bar.

    2. Re:Which is why... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I believe it was explained in an earlier iOS 5 event that the pics taken from the lock screen are sequestered in a separate memory area and have to be promoted to your regular album.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  93. Have vs. Have Nots by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Go watch the video of the various things it does, then come back and say the competition has the same thing with a straight face...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Have vs. Have Nots by green1 · · Score: 1

      The competition has the same thing. (You can't see my face, but it's straight)

    2. Re:Have vs. Have Nots by green1 · · Score: 1

      Take a look at vlingo

    3. Re:Have vs. Have Nots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The competition has nothing like it.

    4. Re:Have vs. Have Nots by green1 · · Score: 1

      Vlingo

  94. VR for the rest of humanity by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Vlingo Plus Personal Assistant for iOS, Android, and Blackberry.

    Did yo notice that all of the commands you send it have the action you want taken, then some data?

    That is fine for a technical person who is used to thinking like that but hard to use for people who do not. Siri lets you mix action and data any way, and can have multiple steps involved... watch the video for the examples they used. It's more impressive than I thought it would be.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:VR for the rest of humanity by narcc · · Score: 1

      I checked out the demo again I tried a few similar phrases out in Vlingo, with various results. (To your first point, you're right. For whatever reason, it never occurred to me to ask my phone if I need an umbrella when I could simply ask for the weather. I'll take you at your word that I'm in the minority here.)

      Anyhow, I dug up this article from 2010 which highlights some of the differences between Vlingo and Siri. They seem to take (in general) two different approaches to the same problem:
      http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/Vlingo-Answers-Apple-Siri-With-SuperDialer-for-Android-459856/

      Back to the demo. Some of the things in the Siri demo are identical in Vlingo such as reading and replying to messages (the jogger in the demo says "read message" and "reply: defiantly, I'll see you there" keeping with the (rather sensible) command / data approach. Same with the "text [name] [message]" part.

      It diverges somewhat for questions like "what's the traffic like around here" -- but that's not really interesting within a set of limited domains. It's similar to how Vlingo will give me a list of restaurants near me when I say "Mexican restaurants" or something similar -- snagging my location form the GPS and doing a specialized search like Siri does. Siri just seems to allow more free-form questions

      I did try a few free-form inquiries with vlingo just to see what I could get it to do. I started with a simple "send a text to steve, how are you" instead of my normal "text steve message how are you" and they worked identically. The more complex "I'm hungry for Mexican food" snagged my location from GPS and pulled up a list of local Mexican restaraunts (with ratings, address, and a button to call them) just like my earlier, simpler, query. It looks like I'd need to try Siri out to really see how much they actually differ here.

      The neat bit with Siri seems to happen with questions like "what about napa valley?" -- remembering the previous inquery and adjusting it and the subsequent reply. I'm curious to see how this will ultimately work in practice, however, as it doesn't seem too far removed from the average chat bot (which is sure to produce some bizarre results in response to odd phrasing or misinterpreted speech.) This isn't to say that it's not nifty, just that I expect it will function more like Alice than the Star Trek computer (the parallel the demo wants us to draw, obviously).

      Ultimately, I'd really need to play with Siri for a bit to see how much they really differ and what advantages Siri's narrow-but-deep approach offers over Vlingo's broad-but-shallow approach.

      Anyhow, having dug a bit deeper, I think I understand your point.

  95. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    Except that Apple is already following the RIM(job) model of being lazy and making extremely minor changes and thinking they can stay on top. That's why iOS's market share hasn't changed for over a year now while Android's market share keeps going up and up - because the companies making Android phones are innovating constantly as well as Google updating Android more than once a year with minor changes. Eventually investors will realize that Apple has peaked and that stock will start to drop - FAST.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  96. Re:Yawn! Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did just that... Problem is, the new iPhone 4S looks identical to the iPhone 4 so no one picked it up...

  97. Does the "S" mean suck? by starfire83 · · Score: 1

    What gets me is why this is coming to market without any of the current "4G" technologies for all the supported carriers. According to the tech specs there's no LTE, HSPA+, or WiMax antennas. At least on Sprint it would make sense to include a WiMax antenna since they're the only ones remaining with truly unlimited data for their phones (they just capped their mobile broadband to 5GB).

    1. Re:Does the "S" mean suck? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      What gets me is why this is coming to market without any of the current "4G" technologies for all the supported carriers. According to the tech specs there's no LTE, HSPA+, or WiMax antennas. At least on Sprint it would make sense to include a WiMax antenna since they're the only ones remaining with truly unlimited data for their phones (they just capped their mobile broadband to 5GB).

      There is currently no "true" LTE chipset from Qualcomm. They have LTE "data" but not voice which is a problem because then you cannot implement and LTE "world" phone and have to settle for two LTE models. Don't believe me? Look up their roadmap.

      As for Wi-Max, that is a real niche standard which was not even intended for use in handsets. It was meant for wireless home internet connectivity.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Does the "S" mean suck? by starfire83 · · Score: 1

      WiMax may be a niche standard but it's in all of Sprint's high-end and flagship phones. Suffice to say, with Sprint's ideals about keeping unlimited data for their phones, not including WiMax is kind of a kick in the pants because the iPhone hitting Sprint could, potentially, boost their customer base. There's plenty of people wanting to leave Verizon and AT&T but want to keep their precious iDevice. As far as LTE goes, I can see keeping LTE out until there's both data and voice on the carriers that use that standard so they can promote an actual world phone with a "4G" technology in it.

  98. Wake me up when iPhone 5 is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is such a waist of time and a big con by Apple to make money for pone more year on cheap to produce hardware.