Slashdot Mirror


How To Catch a Laptop Thief?

First time accepted submitter otaku244 writes "I spent a day in Vancouver this week while working in Seattle. While I enjoyed the area, some Vancouver citizen decided to enjoy my Macbook Pro. Unfortunately, I didn't discover this until I was already back at my Seattle hotel. Needless to say, I am quite miffed at the whole experience. Fortunately, I have LogMeIn installed on that machine. I provided the IP address to the VPD, but they say that laws don't allow warrants solely on the physical address tied to an IP. It sounds like the silver bullet is to take a picture of the person using the laptop. The question becomes, how do I convince the guy to run a script that will take a picture of him and smtp it to me? I promise to post pics of the guy if this gets pulled off successfully!"

485 comments

  1. Just lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write a fully automated script, and send it to him, claiming it will make an auto backup of your data to the smtp, and then he can keep the comp with no trouble. Click click boom boom. You win.

    1. Re:Just lie by youn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alternatively tell him you are a reputable african prince and you have a business proposal :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  2. :0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider it a favor

  3. Hate to say it... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the best moment for you to take action is long gone - when you had your laptop in your possession.

    Let this be a lesson readers, do something to secure your possessions now, install something to allow for ease of tracking and identification now, not as an afterthought when it gets nicked.

    To the op, can't you just log in with LogMeIn and set a script running which takes a photo every minute or so?

    1. Re:Hate to say it... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Yep. Whenever my MacBook is with me outside of the the apartment, it is either in in the shoulderbag (which looks NOTHING like a laptop case), actually under my fingers as I'm typing, or, in the case of out of town events, locked in the room safe when I am not using it.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    2. Re:Hate to say it... by otaku244 · · Score: 1

      Very true. Yeah, it is possible. I can file transfer a script to the machine silently, but I can't execute it. So then the trick becomes how do I pull off running it?
      One option is to log into the session and run it. He will definitely see me snooping around.
      The other option is to convince him to run it for me.... like attaching it to a video called "lesbian canadian mounties". The problem is that I don't see any scripts readily available to conduct the feat and I'm a little unfamiliar with working on the OS at this level. So taking a crash course in this sort of work will not be easy... especially without the benefit of a Mac to test it on. The one thing I have going for me is that there are numerous Automator and AppleScript guides for building an iSight capture script. I just lack the hardware to test it on.

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    3. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use LogMeIn and run the script yourself. Then when the perp isn't using the computer, quickly send it to yourself. Use the command prompt if possible because then they won't know what is happening.

    4. Re:Hate to say it... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You don't have ssh enabled, then? If you did, then you could run it from the terminal. What does logmein let you do?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Hate to say it... by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I installed Prey months ago and my Mac never leaves my house....

    6. Re:Hate to say it... by shentino · · Score: 0

      Better yet don't take your laptop abroad in the first place.

      If the thief hadn't stolen it, customs would have confiscated it anyway.

    7. Re:Hate to say it... by pz · · Score: 1

      Does MacOS have crontabs?

      Can you write (a) a new script you want to execute every minute, and (b) a new crontab to activate it automatically?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    8. Re:Hate to say it... by bangthegong · · Score: 1

      There's an app called evocam that will take a pic every x seconds and save it. you can have evocam save the photos to your dropbox folder. It's free to try for a month, so if you can still access your desktop it might be worth a shot.

    9. Re:Hate to say it... by jjsimp · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Macbook, do they have a startup folder? If so, just copy the file or a batch file that points to the script in that startup folder. Then next time he reboots the script runs.

    10. Re:Hate to say it... by bangthegong · · Score: 2

      Caveat emptor - hotel safes are not necessarily safe. Many have very simple default passwords so that the hotel management can get in if you forget your password. http://gizmodo.com/5837561/can-000000-secretly-open-your-hotel-safe

    11. Re:Hate to say it... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any time, at least in the last ten yea o so, that I couldn't set my in-room safe to my own password. Granted, its usually only 4 numbers long, but it's still my password.

    12. Re:Hate to say it... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any time, at least in the last ten year or so, that I couldn't set my in-room safe to my own password. Granted, its usually only 4 numbers long, but it's still my password.

      The point is that the default password also works at the same time. A proper design would clear the user's password when the default one is used. If you come back and can't get into the safe, then you know the default was used.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    13. Re:Hate to say it... by fa2k · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting question whether to use full disk encryption, or to use some kind of tracking and allow the thief to log in so they don't wipe the computer. I suspect that tracking + some kind of lesser encryption (or even just a login password for the "secret" account) is best suited for most people's threat models.

    14. Re:Hate to say it... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 3, Informative
      The OP apparently doesn't even know why he installed LogMeIn in the first place. From the LogMeIn website:

      Key Features Remote Control Your Computer Access your desktop from anywhere. Wake-On-LAN Start a sleeping computer on LAN. PC or Mac compatible Anytime, anywhere remote access.

      It does this by installing their remote desktop client on the host to remote into, proxies through their servers over regular HTTP / port 80, and also features a web based control/viewer. The following is an excerpt from Wikipedia

      Users access remote desktops using either the LogMeIn Ignition stand-alone application or a web portal. The web portal requires either an ActiveX plugin for Internet Explorer, or an extension for Firefox (the LogMeIn plug-in for Firefox), or an extension for Safari (the LogMeIn plug-in for Safari), failing that it falls back to requiring Java in order to run a Java program,[3] and failing that it falls back to "a screen-shot based HTML remote control".[4] The web portal also provides status information for the remote computers and, optionally, remote computer management functions.

      So he has all the remote desktop capabilities in the world he could want. All he needs to do is setup a script to take photos whenever the lid is opened, and check on the browser cookies to see what web-sites the thief is going to. Even if the Apple camera application doesn't support this, I'm sure there are plenty of F/LOSS camera applications that would.

      Basically, he needs to do what this DEFCON hacker did. Failing all of that, he could provide the S/N and other info to the Vancouver PD and Apple, so that if the thief attempts taking it to an Apple store to have it wiped (and removing LogMeIn by doing so) if they follow their processes and check the S/N, they should see it is a stolen laptop...

    15. Re:Hate to say it... by retchdog · · Score: 3, Informative

      there's a backdoor so the hotel doesn't have to jimmy the safe everytime an idiot forgets their password.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    16. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the linked video is not that you can't set your own password to the safe but that no matter what password you set the default password (in this case 000000) still opens it.

    17. Re:Hate to say it... by jpate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the thief hadn't stolen it, customs would have confiscated it anyway.

      What are you talking about?? Customs only cares about expensive gifts, expensive items you intend to sell (including counterfeits), and items that might introduce invasive species or diseases. I'm an American who has been in and out of the US several times with my laptop, and I've never encountered any problem with customs. "abroad" is not some scary, law-less pit of oppression. Try getting out sometime.

    18. Re:Hate to say it... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      Download Backblaze and use their Wifi location device. If it and the IP address correspond then they have more than "just an IP address" they have what block it's located in and the IP address which will probably correspond.

    19. Re:Hate to say it... by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      He was probably referring to the US customs... they've been known to impound laptops from foreign travellers and not return them. They're not even required to do so in a reasonable timespan (AFAIK).

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    20. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your MacBook never leaves your apartment what is the point in owning one?

    21. Re:Hate to say it... by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      So he can use his laptop on the crapper, couch, dinner table, ... or wherever else he wants to without having to drag a tower, monitor, mouse, and power cord.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    22. Re:Hate to say it... by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Apple has something a little more advanced than crontabs (which is great for servers, but not so much for laptops which are not always on). It can launch once, launch on the xx clock, or launch after x time has passed and the computer is on.

    23. Re:Hate to say it... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      You could probably skip that whole step and just jump to the easiest possible solution.

      1) Open a web browser.
      2) type in "Facebook.com"

      What do you want to bet that the thief remained logged in?

      If that doesn't work check the web history and see where they've been. Then go through site by site and see if any of them are still logged in, then get the name.

      If the name and the general address vs WiFi location are one and the same then you've got a slamdunk case for the police to at least just knock on the door and see if the face/facebook picture of the person answering the door are one and the same.

      If they are then SURELY the police would have reasonable suspicion to search.

    24. Re:Hate to say it... by plover · · Score: 2

      I wish I remember the brand of in-room safe they used at the last hotel I stayed at. The safe displayed something like "Eror", so we called the desk who sent a security guy to come open it. He had to plug a cable into a port hidden behind the logo in the door, and he had to set some kind of device on the top of the safe. He then entered some stuff on a Palm Pilot on the other end of the cables, and the safe was opened and reset. There was no visible opening on the top of the safe so I assume it's inductively coupled some how. (Of course it could have been a simple electromagnet/reed switch and Morse code, too. I couldn't exactly tell what it was doing.)

      It would have been nice to have two people, one with the device and one with the passwords. But still, at least it was complex enough that the housekeeping staff wouldn't ordinarily be able to do it.

      --
      John
    25. Re:Hate to say it... by Genda · · Score: 2

      Log in Remote and upload then register an app called "Joke of the Day" to your laptop. Make certain it shows up in the Dock. Make certain its Icon is bright, colorful, and funny! Have the App actually provide him with a great joke every day. Have the app also take pictures and send them to you. In fact open video and have it stream to you. Log his keystrokes (it is your computer and he's using it without your permission.) Have is send the web logs, and pretty much anything you can possibly use against him in the future. If he has an iPhone or iPad, get the GPS data from it through the Mac when they sync. When you have everything you need to flush this walking dung from the toilet bowl of life, provide a neat data package to the local PD. If it contains video of other illegal activity, all the better. Find out when the police are about to arrive, and send an email to the idiot (since you've been capturing his email address(es) and password(s), and the email should read as follows:

      You my friend are a Scum Sucking Pig,
      You seem to think the way to live is to take what is not rightfully yours and rob people of what they worked hard for. This makes you both stupid and self destructive. Your actions will cost you a terrible price, and sadly for you... The fruits of sin have just ripened. Say hi to the detective for me, won't you?

      Last, go to the prison they send him to. Let the prison folk know he has a visitor. When he comes, let him know what a beautiful day it is outside. Draw a happy face on the glass of the visitors booth. Let him know the days of taking phones and computers are over. That these machines plus the ubiquitous cameras that are everyplace now make small time crime like his a pointless act with no future. Either get an education and square up his crap, or set the Governors car on fire and get a decent sentence so he'll be guaranteed 3 squares and a roof over his head for the next 15 years. Just stop screwing with folks who can ill afford his silly BS.

    26. Re:Hate to say it... by Ambvai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of my friends, a doctor working with MSF/Doctors Without Borders, had his laptop confiscated for pornography in his medical reference materials. They even graciously told him, 'If you miss your flight, I'll be my fault.'

    27. Re:Hate to say it... by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X has both launchd and cron.

      --
      blog
    28. Re:Hate to say it... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if it can be overridden but I think all Macbooks have a light on the front that lets you know that the camera is on. I'm not sure if there is a easy remote/software only way of disabling that. If not the question would be what do you want out of this scenario? If the guy sees the camera on he might dispose of the laptop. Sure you might get a pic of him (he might as easily be out of the field of view of the camera the first time he notices it on and smart enough to realize it), but either way I think he'd be getting rid of the laptop pronto.

      The best way to deal with laptop thieves would be to dual boot a laptop with two separate hdd bays. Set the default OS to a half pound or so of C4. Now as long as you always remember to chose another option it don't go boom. Laptop thieves be warned.

    29. Re:Hate to say it... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Laptops consume less power than desktops and you can use them pretty much anywhere you want.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    30. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, do it like I do and only use an el cheapo netbook plastered with ugly stickers, running Ubuntu, and having automated backups instead of showing off your latest Apple toy, such that...

      (1) nobody wants to steal your laptop anyway,

      (2) if it gets lost, you don't give much of a shit and buy a new one, and

      (3) you get some real work done instead of having to polish your laptop or watching your own face in a reflecting mirror screen all the time.

      Just a suggestion. Works fine for me.

    31. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Whenever my MacBook is with me outside of the the apartment, it is either in in the shoulderbag (which looks NOTHING like a laptop case), actually under my fingers as I'm typing, or, in the case of out of town events, locked in the room safe when I am not using it.

      You mean a safe like one of these ?

    32. Re:Hate to say it... by Dinghy · · Score: 1

      But still, at least it was complex enough that the housekeeping staff wouldn't ordinarily be able to do it.

      Depends on where you go and what you're doing. My brother was at a wedding in Mexico at a resort, and during the wedding, everyone who was registered as a guest for the wedding had their rooms and safes cleaned out. It was mainly laptops that were taken, as cameras were at the wedding and people were wearing their jewelry. Sure they all filed a report with the hotel, but it didn't matter.

    33. Re:Hate to say it... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Whenever my MacBook is with me outside of the the apartment, it is either in in the shoulderbag (which looks NOTHING like a laptop case), actually under my fingers as I'm typing, or, in the case of out of town events, locked in the room safe when I am not using it.

      You must stay at some fancy hotels. The hotels I've stayed in (Hampton, Holiday inn, various resorts in Orlando, FL for example) have safes that might be big enough for a small tablet like the 7" galaxy tab. I've not seen one that would accommodate a laptop.

    34. Re:Hate to say it... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah...

      And the next time your cute-as-a-button 4 year old niece visits she walks up to your open laptop, presses the "on" button because she wants to watch The Wiggles like she does on mommy's laptop at home and...

      C4 and laptops, baaaaaaad combination.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    35. Re:Hate to say it... by Phleg · · Score: 1

      No need any more. iCloud provides this service completely free of charge.

      --
      No comment.
    36. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also have to reset it every time somebody leaves.

    37. Re:Hate to say it... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      My 14" ThinkPad fits in most hotel room safes. My W500, however barely fit into any. I bet 17" MacBook Pro will not fit anywhere, though.

    38. Re:Hate to say it... by kochanski · · Score: 2

      The only hotel safe I thought was safe for valuables was one with a key, where they handed me the key and said, "If you lose it, it's a 90$ fee because we have to call a locksmith." But that's only been one hotel out of hundreds. Otherwise I think of hotel safes as a first place a thief would look for stuff worth stealing.

    39. Re:Hate to say it... by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      luanchd is the slightly more advanced crontab, but yes, you can (and I do) still use crontab in Lion.

    40. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My lappy was seized coming back into the country (U.S.) from England. THey said that I had not declared it when leaving. 5 years ago and I still haven't gotten it back and never will.

    41. Re:Hate to say it... by retchdog · · Score: 0

      also a good point. :)

      the problem is that they should use a hardware dongle for this (don't even mention encryption), but it's just cheaper to use a secondary password.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    42. Re:Hate to say it... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I know we love our tech, but the best option is just a hard key for maintenance purposes. Then while the door is open you can hit a reset button on the electronic lock.

      - No default/admin code problem
      - Key is the forgotten pin bypass
      - No hard key for guest to lose
      - Still set their own pin (to deal with forgetfulness)
      - Simple room reset for next guest

    43. Re:Hate to say it... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Oh lord would I be pissed. There's no recourse for this?

    44. Re:Hate to say it... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Of course for the truly paranoid, there is a profound problem with install any root based tracking software. What's to stop them from tracking you and selling that information to the highest bidder. You have now turned your notebook into a device, to monitor and track all your uses of it and any activities you do in front of it and you are blindly hoping they don't change or alter conditions of contract or employ cheap disgruntled nerd teenagers or jock strap douches because they are even cheaper.

      Rock and a hard place, they harder you make something mobile to steal, the more privacy you must give away and blindly hope is not abused.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    45. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't kid yourself.

      most of us who steal laptops actually know what we are doing, and format the data and the MBR... or we just replace the harddrive. Only dumb kids would steal a laptop and try to use it fresh.

    46. Re:Hate to say it... by atisss · · Score: 1

      I do have reverse ssh connection in my if-up.d to my house router, so I can connect to my laptop anytime it's on network without knowing it's ip.

    47. Re:Hate to say it... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "You must stay at some fancy hotels. The hotels I've stayed in (Hampton, Holiday inn, various resorts in Orlando, FL for example) have safes that might be big enough for a small tablet like the 7" galaxy tab. I've not seen one that would accommodate a laptop.

      My MacBook is a 13" edition. I've yet to encounter a safe I can't get it into.

      To be honest, a hacked NOOK Color would suit my travelling needs almost as well as the MacBook.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    48. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When out in places like that, one should also carry a laptop case - filled with explosives rigged to explode when opened of course. So if someone steals it... pity on them. If they're stupid enough to steal, they get what they deserve. So just enjoy your laptop and when they see you with it and later snags the case, thinking they hit the jackpot, and well - in a sense they did. Another one chalked up as a Darwin Award candidate and you can be proud that you've done yours to help improve the genetic material of the human race.

    49. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course there's a recourse for it. Never go to the "land of the free and home of the brave".

    50. Re:Hate to say it... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Plus built in UPS. Really handy.

    51. Re:Hate to say it... by Mindflux0 · · Score: 1

      What do you do when he turns out to be as crazy as you and criminal? As in, when he gets out of prison (assuming he even goes to prison for stealing a laptop) and then finds you and sends you to the hospital, or kills you?

    52. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How secure is a MAC,
      I would seriously disable my itunes account or change the password and everywhere else

    53. Re:Hate to say it... by Migraineman · · Score: 2

      Haven't read the Evil Overlord Handbook, have we? Don't announce your plans prior to their execution. Don't gloat over your victim's predicament.

    54. Re:Hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He probably pawned it off pretty soon after stealing it..

    55. Re:Hate to say it... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      If they are using your laptop, chances are they are reading your e-mail.

      Just set up a catchy gmail account or some such and send yourself a similarly catchy named attachment. Britney-Spears-does-the-nasty.whatever. Embed your script or suitable binary in that.

    56. Re:Hate to say it... by Pope · · Score: 1

      "While I enjoyed the area, some Vancouver citizen decided to enjoy my Macbook Pro"

      What does this mean, exactly? Why not just say plainly "Someone stole my laptop"? The way you wrote it, they could have liked using it and nothing more.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    57. Re:Hate to say it... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      If you can upload a script, how hard can it be to place it in an auto-run location or to replace something commonly run?

      Btw, after thinking about this, I'm seriously tempted to install a meterpreter shell on my laptop that dials back to a metasploit instance running either on my home VM servers or in the cloud. I could turn the VM on when needed but otherwise leave it off. But man, if I ever lost my laptop, I'd have all the access I'd ever need!

      --
      I do security
    58. Re:Hate to say it... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      They even graciously told him, 'If you miss your flight, I'll be my fault.'

      West Virginia has customs now?

    59. Re:Hate to say it... by fa2k · · Score: 2

      I figured it out!! (a bit late): In addition to having your main encrypted partition, add a separate unencrypted partition full of tracking software! Then make the TrueCrypt (or what ever) boot loader say something like "Press Esc to boot" and if one hits Esc it loads the unencrypted partition, while if one types the password it loads the main encrypted OS. This gives you the best of both worlds, and I'm seriously considering doing this (installing some old copy of Vista or something for the unencrypted bit). And of wipe the computer clean when getting it back of course.

    60. Re:Hate to say it... by retchdog · · Score: 0

      a key is a hardware dongle. :)

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    61. Re:Hate to say it... by toxonix · · Score: 1

      Agreed. your commodity hardware is gone, along with anything personal you left on it. I wonder what the chances are of the thief actually booting up and browsing porn for a few hours? I doubt anyone steals a laptop without swapping/obliterating the hard drive and re-installing the OS. The better to re-sell it that way. On Craigslist. I've had about $2500 worth of stuff stolen every year for the last few years. That includes electronics, 5 bikes, lawnmowers, tools, my truck.. Once its gone, its gone. If you don't mind paying another type of thief, buy insurance. Sometimes insurance is worth it.

    62. Re:Hate to say it... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      you mean the bilk you the 90$ and call the locksmith(Home depot) to duplicate the backup key.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    63. Re:Hate to say it... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      To be honest, a hacked NOOK Color would suit my travelling needs almost as well as the MacBook.

      is that a statement about the quality of the Nook or the MacBook. Or just showing your diminutive needs?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    64. Re:Hate to say it... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      My needs while travelling. Email, some web use, music player, and, of course, ereader. If I got an Eye-Fi wireless SD card for the camera, so I could get pictures into the Nook via WiFi, then MAYBE I might need a simple photo editor.

      If the 7" Galaxy Tab was more realistically priced, I'd probably get one of those, but seeing as B&N is selling refurbed Nook Color tablets on eBay for less than US$200...

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    65. Re:Hate to say it... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Mechanical locks are generally pretty easy to open.

      For the round locks that are common on such things as small safes, a small screwdriver (preferably with a 90 degree bend, but any regular screwdriver with an appropriately-sized blade will do) and a bit of small, stuff wire will open it in a hurry, and not really leave any identifying marks behind.

    66. Re:Hate to say it... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I've had better luck with regular locks, myself... probably a practice issue.

      That said, I think we can agree it's you'll find far frewer capable locksmiths than people who can press "0000" on a keypad. ;)

      We use the electronic kind on lockers at work with digital master keys. They're horrible. Always unreliable, disappear just as frequently as keys and they're really expensive. Like, more than those hotel safes cost.

  4. Pretend to be a chick? by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    First, I don't get it .. if you have something like logmein why can't you log in and start Facetime or something like that .. before you do it .. test it with a friend cause you probably wont get many chances.

    Anyway .. if that fails, tell him you're a chick? Most likely the thief is male, so you could entice him to do it that way. You have his email address of something? how would you communicate with him?

    Btw, rather than hand him over to the cops .. just ask for the laptop back and tell him you're keeping the photos of him. Also, check with law enforcement if you are allowed to take pictures like that .. it may be against the law .. stupid as it sounds.

    1. Re:Pretend to be a chick? by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      Also if you are starting facetime make sure u have it recording .. either with software or aiming a camera at the screen

  5. Old trojan trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you have a way of dumping somthing on the desktop, just call it somthing along the lines of "Safari" or "Pages"
    he'll click eventually.

    1. Re:Old trojan trick by obarel · · Score: 1

      Maybe he still likes Anna Kournikova...

  6. you should've gone with Prey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.preyproject.com

    1. Re:you should've gone with Prey by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And installed it BEFORE it was stolen.

      I run 3 versions of prey. 1 controlled by the website. 2 controlled by a web page one that scps me the results and another e-mails.

      I also run Orbicule. I've tested it numerous times (Nothing sucks more than having a solution that doesn't work when you need it.)

      I ALSO run autossh with a reverse tunnel to SSH, if it has internet, I can ssh to it.

      The computer also has "guest" enabled, so if it's stolen it's not a paperweight to the person using it and hopefully they will try to.

    2. Re:you should've gone with Prey by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

      So couldn't he install this via LogMeIn?

    3. Re:you should've gone with Prey by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      He could. But he has this irrational paranoia about doing anything ON the computer because the guy may be watching it.

      Personally If I had autossh already installed I'd open a terminal window do a 'nohup autossh' and get a tunnel going and THEN start tinkering.

  7. Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could pull the typical "You're computer has a virus!!!11!!" thing. Just use that to a) Get a picture, and b) if you haven't install an SSH server. With the SSH server you can transfer programs onto the computer and execute them entirely in the background.

  8. SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have the IP address, You can SSH in and use the screencapture utility to take a picture.

    I'm pretty sure that to smtp it to yourself you'd have to do something visible or install smtpd, which is a lot of work to configure. You'd be better off just scp-ing it to another computer.

    1. Re:SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the SSH daemon has the SFTP-server process, just "SFTP" the file, otherwise yes, scp.

      And I'm pretty darn sure there's a way to trigger the camera without a GUI tool.

    2. Re:SSH by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If you have both sftp and scp, then why would you use sftp... ever...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:SSH by s0litaire · · Score: 1

      if the laptop has an "iSight" camera (what ever that is...)
      then he needs to look here
      http://www.hackmac.org/hacks/hack-and-disable-the-isight-camera/

      ssh into the system upload the file and run it to capture images then use any command line mail application to send it to you.

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    4. Re:SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the screencapture utility is a command line tool

    5. Re:SSH by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You don't need an sftp-server to transfer files through ssh.

      ssh remote "cat filename" >localfile

    6. Re:SSH by linuxgeek64 · · Score: 0

      SCP is pretty limited and useless compared to SFTP.

  9. just remember their comment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Should the riaa ever comes looking for

  10. Photobooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This exact same thing happened to me and I used photobooth to put his image onscreen and then used a screen capture on my other machine to get a shot of his face

  11. Case Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any personal experience, but here's how a presenter at a previous Defcon did it.

  12. DEFCON Must watch by David89 · · Score: 1

    I haven't learned how to code links, but this video is pretty similar to your situation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4oB28ksiIo

    --
    Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
  13. Police comments don't make sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "laws don't allow warrants solely on the physical address tied to an IP"

    So how has the RIAA managed to push their lawsuits forward for all these years? Seems that the only "evidence" they use is the IP address, and that's been plenty good enough to unleash the full force and effect of the US court system on their targets.

    1. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by Scaba · · Score: 1

      When did Vancouver become part of the US? Did I miss some recent war between the US and Canada?

    2. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by jone_stone · · Score: 1

      Except, perhaps, that this is in Canada. Do you know the rules for probable cause in Canada? I suppose it may be complicated even more by the fact that it's across an international border.

    3. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by AaxelB · · Score: 1

      Vancouver (/væn.kuvr/) is a coastal seaport city on the mainland of British Columbia, Canada.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouver

    4. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Because the poster hasn't contributed to the Policeman's Beneficial Retirement Fund.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 1

      When did Vancouver become part of the US? Did I miss some recent war between the US and Canada?

      "Vancouver this week while working in Seattle"

      There's ALSO a Vancouver in Washington. Which is where Seattle is. Don't think it was specified WHICH Vancouver.

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    6. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Nope, the White House isn't burning yet.

    7. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When did Vancouver become part of the US? Did I miss some recent war between the US and Canada?

      There is also Vancouver Washington. The article summary doesn't specify which Vancouver this person was visiting; both are reasonably close to Seattle Washington.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    8. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by tqk · · Score: 0

      ... that's been plenty good enough to unleash the full force and effect of the US court system on their targets.

      Pull out a map of North America, then locate Vancouver. See that 49th parallel below it? Do you feel that clue starting to tickle and rattle around in your head yet? Take your time. No hurry.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by wysiwig3 · · Score: 1

      Living in Seattle, I assume he did mean Vancouver, BC, Canada. However, I did have to stop for a moment and wonder about Vancouver, WA, USA (on the Oregon border). Though... I don't know who the hell goes to play tourist there ;)

    10. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      Vancouver is a city on the north bank of the Columbia River in the U.S. state of Washington.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouver,_Washington

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    11. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    12. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by Teun · · Score: 1
      Why would an American cross borders?

      http://www.cityofvancouver.us/

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    13. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by shentino · · Score: 1

      Simple.

      The RIAA paid their politician rental fee. You, have not.

    14. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      So how has the RIAA managed to push their lawsuits forward for all these years?

      First of all, the RIAA is civil not criminal. The police will need a criminal search warrant, and an IP isn't enough for that. Secondly, Vancouver, BC isn't in the USA.

    15. Re:Police comments don't make sense. by Noren · · Score: 1

      Ah, a history question! When Vancouver was established in 1824 it was under joint occupation by the U.S. and Britain, per the Anglo-American Convention of 1818. Along with the rest of the Oregon Territory, it became officially part of the U.S. in 1846 per the Oregon Treaty. It has been ever since. So, the answer is actually somewhat complicated, it was jointly occupied by the U.S. since 1824, but has been unambiguously part of the U.S since 1846.

      Many years later, in 1886 the townsite of Granville in the British Dominion of Canada was incorporated to become the city of Vancouver, in British Columbia. Of course, Canada itself wouldn't become a nation for many more years.

  14. Re:Be Proactive by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    i bet you wear a fanny pack, huh? i'm quite sick of this metrosexuality fad.

    Huh?

    The majority of fanny packs I've seen (including mine) are holsters. I wasn't aware that carrying a Glock around was the new trendy fad.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  15. Lazy police by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like the police just don't want to bother. If it was the MPAA, RIAA, or Apple asking, they would have a SWAT team there in under 5 minutes.

    The IP address with location may not be sufficient for a conviction, but it does support probably cause. Why not see if you can go to the location, and then h

    Don't you have sshd enabled on your mac with an appropriate 50 character password? Just use ssh to remotely do it.

    Doesn't LogMeIn allow you to remotely control the machine? Use (ssh is preferred) that to set up a script that takes the picture, make several copies in several locations, copies the file via scp, and ftp to a couple of different locations. Then wait for him to log into different web sites so you can have his user ids, then have the computer take pictures.

    1. Re:Lazy police by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      50 character password on your private key...

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    2. Re:Lazy police by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

      You forget Vancouver is in a different country. The MPAA, RIAA and SWAT teams have no presence here. In addition, the RCMP have stated in the past that they will not be tracking down filesharers. Further still, our privacy laws do not allow ISPs to share subscriber information based only on an IP address.

      Way offtopic I know, but I think it's worth clearing up the issue.

      --
      -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
    3. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually he doesn't say which Vancouver he visited. Seattle is roughly midway between the two.

      To be fair, he does say he "enjoyed the area," so that probably rules out Vancouver WA.

    4. Re:Lazy police by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Pardon? ??AA might not be effective in Canada, but you can bet they have a presence. How else are they going to lobby to change Canadian law?

      You don't have SWAT? That's quite unbelievable. I'm sure they go by a different designation. Somebody deals with hostage situations, bomb threats, trains for dealing with rogue snipers, etc.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    5. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe there is a Vancouver, WA as well.

    6. Re:Lazy police by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Mounties. They are actually quite badass.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    7. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think an IP address tied to a physical location is reasonable. Otherwise you could cruise down the block connecting to any unsecured wireless access point and have the cops waste a lot of time and harass a lot of citizens who have done nothing wrong. It's a good start, but I feel as though you should need slightly more evidence before you send the cops in with a search warrant.

    8. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Houses are more protected under the fourth amendment than anything in public, such as a car, and are not subject to probable cause searches that are not emergencies.

    9. Re:Lazy police by Kikuchi · · Score: 2

      If it was [...] Apple asking, ...

      Apple wouldn't ask, they would send their own henchmen disguised as SWAT.

      --
      There's no scientific consensus that life is important.
    10. Re:Lazy police by Chucky_M · · Score: 5, Funny

      He could introduce himself as Professor Doblisnski from the Kiev University where he teaches advanced Nuclear Weapons programmes. Happily explain that your Mac contained an unfortunate amount of technical details on how to make and deploy a warhead using only kitchen supplies but was stolen by a Mulslim looking guy who has this IP address as tracked by your embassy security services. You could follow on with, my Embassy told me not to come here and inform you but as a human being I thought you should at least be warned, sorry cant stay on the phone I am leaving the area as all non essential embassy staff have been evacuated etc...

      Ok you might not get the Macbook back but it will be the last one that particular guy steals and I am just guessing, but that IP law might not apply :)

    11. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a non-American. Here we just send a drone over to bomb the place. We already have drones in the air keeping an eye out for eskimo smugglers. They're taking away taxi driver jobs from good "honest" Pakistanians.

    12. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It sounds like the police just don't want to bother. If it was the MPAA, RIAA, or Apple asking, they would have a SWAT team there in under 5 minutes."

      Since it's Canada, neither the MPAA, RIAA, nor Apple have nearly as much political influence.

    13. Re:Lazy police by rueger · · Score: 2

      What? Tasering ten year old kids is "bad-ass?"

    14. Re:Lazy police by Surt · · Score: 2

      Indeed, while they dress like frilly girls, in general it would take no more than 10 mounties to take on 1 swat.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    15. Re:Lazy police by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Don't you have sshd enabled on your mac with an appropriate 50 character password?

      Why on earth would anyone have a 50 character password for SSH when SSH supports public key authentication? Don't you have sshd enabled with an appropriate public key?

    16. Re:Lazy police by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      There's an option. Tell them you are an Apple employee and you've lost a prototype iPhone 5. Yep they will show up quick.

    17. Re:Lazy police by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      In Canada we call it MUTA for Moose Up The A** you don't want to mess with the MUTA team just come up with your hands up ;-)

    18. Re:Lazy police by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the police just don't want to bother. If it was the MPAA, RIAA, or Apple asking, they would have a SWAT team there in under 5 minutes.

      The IP address with location may not be sufficient for a conviction, but it does support probably cause. Why not see if you can go to the location, and then h

      Don't you have sshd enabled on your mac with an appropriate 50 character password? Just use ssh to remotely do it.

      Doesn't LogMeIn allow you to remotely control the machine? Use (ssh is preferred) that to set up a script that takes the picture, make several copies in several locations, copies the file via scp, and ftp to a couple of different locations. Then wait for him to log into different web sites so you can have his user ids, then have the computer take pictures.

      We're talking about the VPD here... if it was the MPAA, RIAA or Apple asking, they'd go tell them to talk to the CRIA or RCMP for starters. The VPD is a Canadian city force, not some federal watchdog. If you want to see the VPD in action, look up the Vancouver riots.

      As far as I know, BC law doesn't say anything about what you can use your laptop for... and again, based on the riots, they don't seem to go after people who publish photos of people doing criminally stupid things.

    19. Re:Lazy police by ablcmx · · Score: 1

      Hostage situations, bomb threats, rogue snipers?

      Oh....right....

    20. Re:Lazy police by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Sigh....

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    21. Re:Lazy police by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "Don't you have sshd enabled on your mac with an appropriate 50 character password?"

      Really, 7 characters should be enough.

      sneezysleepyhappygrumpydopeybashfuldoc

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    22. Re:Lazy police by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends on how paranoid you are. If you are worried about losing physical access to the machine then passwords are probably more secure as there is a window between when the laptop is stolen and when you actually notice it and have the keys invalidated that the person who stole it can use to login. Now they probably won't, but...

    23. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VPD takes their time. 4 months and still only a handful of arrests for the hockey riots....

      Having said that, if you can use logmein to get on your PC, you should be able to even put a startup script so the next reboot will load the software that uploads your stuff

    24. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssh won't work. even if he has the ip, the laptop is behind a router with a local unreachable IP address.

    25. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a laptop stolen in vancouver as well (Burnaby Library). Cops could hardly be bothered to file a report (and there were cameras everywhere). The laws seem pretty well set up to protect thievery and it seems to be considered the norm up there.

    26. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I might try the cop's supervisor or see if you can't contact someone who is a bit more tech savvy. I don't know if it's laziness on the cop's part. In my own experience, police officers tend to be EXTREMELY bad with technology (I knew two exceptions but one of them was snatched up by private industry pretty quickly).

      Or, perhaps there really is a local law to prevent that kind of warrant and the cops probably aren't going to fight it (and risk their jobs/pensions/etc) for your laptop.

      It sucks man but unless you're willing to stray from the legal-stuff, it sounds like your laptop is gone. Just so you know, a school district near me got hammered with lawsuits for taking pictures of students remotely using anti-theft software. Is your laptop really worth risking that kind of trouble?

    27. Re:Lazy police by greed · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's not how it works.

      You put the public key on the machine you're going to (in this case, the laptop).

      The private key stays on the machine you run the 'ssh' command from.

      And keep that private key within a single trust domain (single machine for home/school use; department LAN at the office if you must). So stealing a copy of the PUBLIC key can't compromise any other node--all you can do with it is allow someone to log on to more machines. You can't impersonate them, or log on to the machine with their private key, or any other machine with the same public key.

      And, of course, you're using a passphrase on the key--though that doesn't affect the public key, only access to the private key.

    28. Re:Lazy police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download some movies

    29. Re:Lazy police by phreakazoas · · Score: 1

      That is beyond awesome!

  16. Prey project by feranick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... I know it's too late for you now. But, you should consider prey project. It does now what you are asking.

    1. Re:Prey project by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2

      It's worth mentioning that Apple's own iCloud also has a subset of Prey's features like geolocation, remote locking/wiping and sending a message. Doesn't support taking a picture or using the webcam though.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    2. Re:Prey project by otaku244 · · Score: 1

      This is a great suggestion! Both this and the iCloud mentioned are the way I'll go in the future

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    3. Re:Prey project by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      If he can access the computer remotely, can install what he wants. His only problem is that he doesn't know how to access the camera without the GUI, which is not a problem for many of us.

      The computer being a Mac means my Linux answer won't be helpful, but I bet there is something of the kind on Mac as well. Like, let's say, installing Prey.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Prey project by darkeye · · Score: 1

      yes, Prey to the rescue, install it via LogMeIn, and then mark your computer as 'lost' - Prey will report the location of the laptop and make pictures with the camera.

      of course, Prey installation is done via the GUI, so you have to pick a time when the thief is not using the laptop, but has it on...

    5. Re:Prey project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ssh access? Install what you want and do it!
      http://lifehacker.com/5838440/how-i-got-my-stolen-laptop-back-within-24-hours-using-prey
      http://wirawanweb.com/2011/06/01/this-guy-has-my-macbook-owner-found-who-stole-his-macbook-created-a-tumblog/

    6. Re:Prey project by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Yes, definitely Prey. It uses almost no resources on the machine until it is activated, it is dirt-simple to remotely activate from any web browser, and even the free service gives you access to location information, webcam shapshots of the user, screenshots, and so on. If you would like the more advanced features, you can purchase them, even after the theft, which is something that as far as I know no other service offers.

      Once I found out how it worked, I installed Prey immediately on my Mac. It has been there ever since, completely unobtrusive and essentially undetectable. I have activated it for test purposes a couple of times, and it continues to just work.

    7. Re:Prey project by theNAM666 · · Score: 2
    8. Re:Prey project by Sir+Mal+Fet · · Score: 1

      As parent says, Prey project is a must in any laptop. Since nobody posted it here's the link [preyproject.com].

    9. Re:Prey Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have installed prey on all my devices, MB Pro, iPad, and even Android phone. I made a test and its pretty awesome, it sends the report about location of the laptop including the screen shot and picture from the webcam while the person in front of laptop having no clue about Prey.

      But I got my doubts, what if the thief decides to wipe the hard drive and install a fresh OS would Prey still work? I am guessing not. But may be we can just password protect Mac's firmware and he won't be able to wipe the hard drive?

      I am always careful about securing my devices, more than loosing the device I am worried about compromising my personal data.

    10. Re:Prey project by pheonix7117 · · Score: 1

      Actually I've had to do a post-theft preyprojet installation (on a windows machine) and managed to find a batch installer for the windows version on their site. Uploaded it to a webserver along with the exe and watched through logmein to see when they stopped using it for an extended period of time, then opened a private session of firefox to download the files and ran the batch script. This could work for a Mac if there was a way to install via command line, or just wait for inactiviy and hope the theif isn't smart. SSH access would be gold in the case, though.....

    11. Re:Prey project by jovius · · Score: 1

      I have prey project installed along with a guest account. The idea is that the possible thief would find the entrance as easy as possible. I can control what the visitor does by making certain software available and besides it appears that the computer is usable (I have the whole armada of Apple i-apps there). This is to prevent the thief from making hardware changes (I have the system hardware lock enabled though) and give some time to me for activating the prey programme.

      If I know the IP number where the machine resides I may be able to begin a remote desktop session through ssh, and do all kinds of interesting surveillance. Sending messages to the thief could be hazardous, because the computer might end up being trashed.

    12. Re:Prey project by gknoy · · Score: 1

      If he can log in w/ logmein, could he set up some port forwarding or something to let him run X remotely, so that the theif never sees the GUI for installing Prey? (I have no idea what you can do on a Mac.)

    13. Re:Prey project by hodet · · Score: 1

      Great responses, thanks I will check Prey. Can anyone speak to the downsides of it? This writer brings up a few issues but it might be old news.

      http://www.shrp.me/docs/dont_use_prey.php

      Just looking for the flip side of using this if there are any.

  17. Really? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I provided the IP address to the VPD, but they say that laws don't allow warrants solely on the physical address tied to an IP."

    Translation: You're a nobody, and we're not going to spend our precious resources tracking down and prosecuting a small-time thief. Come back when you've got a friend in politics or the media.

    If an IP address alone is enough evidence to file civil suit against someone for copyright infringement, and under the new proposals enough to have them disconnected without so much as a trial, I find it hard to believe that it can't be enough to be at least reasonable suspicion and thus grounds for a warrant.

    1. Re:Really? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Come back when you've got a friend in politics or the media.

      Alternative: get a letter from a lawyer. That'll wake the police up a bit.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Really? by otaku244 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry for burring this update here, but I don't know how to update the article above.
      I actually had my business partner on the hunt and we tracked it down to 4th District Vancouver. We also found out that the non-emergency VPD number takes you do a civilian call center. These guys seemed be misinformed about their own laws. So when we connected directly with 4th District, we got a call back from a detective who pulled the case. This happened on Friday. I had already submitted to Slashdot the night before.
      Anyone know who to update the submission?

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    3. Re:Really? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Translation: You're a nobody, and we're not going to spend our precious resources tracking down and prosecuting a small-time thief. Come back when you've got a friend in politics or the media.

      so true. the presence of a police force definitely discourages crime, but once a crime has occurred, as an individual, you are pretty much on your own nowadays unless you have friends in high places or make it into the agenda of some politician. the police exist to provide and environment conducive to corporate profits.

      even if he could run a script and take a picture, he will still have a hard time getting the police to care. your best bet is to use logmein to wipe your personal data and then brick (to the extent possible) the system out of general principle.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not think that the laws of your own country always exist in another.

      In Canada even the recoring industry cannot obtain identities at the end of an IP address for civil suits. (google BMG Canada Inc. v. John Doe and confirm this yourself).

    5. Re:Really? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I think the only way to do that is to submit a new one and put "Update to ...."

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation please sue us to get us to do our job.

    7. Re:Really? by index0 · · Score: 1

      But an IP address is not enough evidence to do anything. See the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMG_Canada_Inc._v._John_Doe

    8. Re:Really? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone know who to update the submission?

      Send an email to CmdrTaco.

      ...oh wait.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Really? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That's a civil case, not a criminal one. Don't know Canadian law but those are subject to very different standards of proof in the US - and I strongly suspect this is similar between the two countries.

    10. Re:Really? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      If an IP address alone is enough evidence to file civil suit against someone for copyright infringement, and under the new proposals enough to have them disconnected without so much as a trial, I find it hard to believe that it can't be enough to be at least reasonable suspicion and thus grounds for a warrant.

      An IP address alone can be enough to file a civil suit and get court-ordered discovery, which may then gather further evidence, but it can also be opposed: you can go to court and argue why the IP address isn't enough, and the judge may agree, and there's no discovery. Additionally, discovery is done with document requests and responses, subpoenas, depositions, etc.

      Compare this to criminal law - if an IP address alone was enough, the cops could get a warrant, kick down your door, seize all of your stuff, arrest you, hold you for questioning, etc. You aren't informed ahead of time, don't get to object, and there's a guy with a gun in your face rather than a letter with a bunch of questions.

      That's why it can be enough for a civil suit, but not enough for a warrant.

    11. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya not like the police don't deal with Lawyers on a regular basis or anything, I'm sure they will be really scared...

    12. Re:Really? by shatteredpottery · · Score: 1

      The 4th what? District? Where the hell is that? I've lived here most of my life and never heard of a 4th District. The city is divided into named districts. Even for our garbage/recycling.

      --

      A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

    13. Re:Really? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      If an IP address alone is enough evidence to file civil suit against someone for copyright infringement, and under the new proposals enough to have them disconnected without so much as a trial, I find it hard to believe that it can't be enough to be at least reasonable suspicion and thus grounds for a warrant.

      Good point! And while you might claim that you don't know where the mp3s and movies came from, or that you never even had them, that probably wouldn't work if you are caught red handed with a Mac Book. "That's not a laptop on my coffee table, and I don't even know how to use a coffee table."

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    14. Re:Really? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Well, based on looking at the VPD web site, I would guess that it's Patrol District 4.

      http://vancouver.ca/police/organization/operations/patrol-districts/district-four/index.html

      Police districts don't necessarily match up to city districts. It allows the police to divide things up in ways that make sense for law enforcement without getting so much into the politics of general districts.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    15. Re:Really? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Well, you know those Vancouverites - always into the weed. We're lucky that he knew there were districts, let alone named ones!

      Just kidding (about the second sentence anyway). But feel free to start a thread on the merits of various illegal (and quasi-legal) drugs.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    16. Re:Really? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2

      Anyone know who to update the submission?

      Just re-submit the corrected story. That way when the dupe is inevitably posted by the (on) crack editorial staff, it'll all work out.

    17. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 0

      An IP address might have been enough if the laptop was located in his own home. In this case, it's stolen and in another place (let alone country) and so the thief probably won't be using the same IP. Hence, providing the IP address doesn't sound like a solution in this case.

    18. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ask slashdot ;-)

      well, thanks for the update... can't help you on how to update it on the news itself, hope someone will come accross this soon

    19. Re:Really? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      ++

      filler filer miler miller millen millenbach

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
  18. Too bad you can't .... by SwedishChef · · Score: 2

    Rig the computer remotely to blow the lithium battery up in the jerk's face!!!

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rig the computer remotely to blow the lithium battery up in the jerk's face!!!

      Again, this is in Canada. We're not allowed to violently defend our property, nor are we allowed to set 'booby traps'. We even have to be careful how we use violence in civilian self defence or defence of others.

    2. Re:Too bad you can't .... by alphatel · · Score: 2

      Rig the computer remotely to blow the lithium battery up in the jerk's face!!!

      It's a Macbook, the battery will explode eventually. But if you want to speed things along..."

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    3. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could, but it would require some modification of the hardware. Also note that you want to scrub any evidence from the laptop before the destruction. Just in case you dont fully destroy the harddrive. Finally, blowing it up in his face might be difficult unless you have a brilliant plan to have the thief hold the device in front of his face.

    4. Re:Too bad you can't .... by mandelbr0t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To cite a specific example: an Alberta farmer who shot at thieves on his property was given 90 days for assault with a deadly weapon, while the thieves got 30 days for stealing.

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    5. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what you're saying is grab a cheep laptop, rig it with a few grams or so of thermite? that's programmed to go off if the remote command is sent? which is attached to the GPS or MAC Address.... and what if that remote command is hacked?

    6. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To cite a specific example: an Alberta farmer who shot at thieves on his property was given 90 days for assault with a deadly weapon, while the thieves got 30 days for stealing.

      Apparently an officer in the British army in India was ordered to punish one of his native riflemen for mistakenly shooting at a missionary (fortunately for the missionary the soldier had failed to hit him). After some time the officer reported to his CO and announced that he had decided on 31 days in the brig. When his commanding officer enquired: Why the extra day? The officer duly replied that the thirty days was for shooting at the missionary, the extra day was for bad marksmanship. Probably not a true story but it is funny.

    7. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a mac, you can. they covered that at defcon.

    8. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a battery, not a bomb.

    9. Re:Too bad you can't .... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Just to make a clear distinction, I now live in Texas. Texas is well known as one of the foremost Castle Doctrine states in the US and is famous for its support of private gun possession. However, booby traps are not at all allowed. A thinking person present for the current situation is required for the use of force for the defense of person or property.

    10. Re:Too bad you can't .... by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      To cite a specific example: an Alberta farmer who shot at thieves on his property was given 90 days for assault with a deadly weapon, while the thieves got 30 days for stealing.

      The laws about justified use of force require that excessive force not be used. Using a lethal weapon is an unreasonable escalation of force against people who are simply stealing property. (Lethal force is usually only permissible in response to lethal force.)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    11. Re:Too bad you can't .... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Unless the thieves were being violent, that's neither self-defense nor the defense of others.

      --
      I am trolling
    12. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually thinking he should go there art night and burn the fuckng house down... that should teach the thief a lesson or two (make sure he can smell who did it, and DON'T GET CAUGHT!)

    13. Re:Too bad you can't .... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      If the perp is dead they cant counter your "they were trying to kill me" claim.

      Remember, if you are going to shoot a home invader, make sure they are dead and IN THE HOME.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Too bad you can't .... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      If the perp is dead they cant counter your "they were trying to kill me" claim.

      Remember, if you are going to shoot a home invader, make sure they are dead and IN THE HOME.

      Don't trust this! Some states have a duty to retreat even in your own home. Many states also still have a requirement that lethal force can only be brought against lethal force even in your own home. Check your local state laws; better yet, ask a lawyer in your own state before you go shooting ANYONE. If you own a gun, then you really should know the specific laws for your state!

      Namely, every gun owner should know two things: how to use their firearm properly, and how to legally operate their firearm!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  19. The other side by bozonian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Upstate New York: last weekend two Sheriff's investigators showed up at my house. They were looking for a stolen laptop and the "GPS on the laptop" had phoned home and told them the laptop was at my house. They just asked if we had recently bought a laptop blah blah blah. They left when it became obvious we knew nothing about it. Two days later 4 rednecks showed up at the house, my wife was home alone. They were looking for their "grandma's laptop that had family pictures on it and the GPS said it was at this house". They went away unsatisfied of course. I called the Sheriff back and told him what happened, and that MacBooks don't have GPS, that the GeoLocation was probably done off my WiFi Mac Address. Needless to say, I run DD-WRT on my multiple, Bridge Repeater routers and I changed the wireless MAC address immediately to break the link between my routers and my location in whatever database this link was stored.

    1. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why didn't you just return the laptop? Clearly the GPS says you have it.

    2. Re:The other side by gd2shoe · · Score: 2

      Uhm, I think you're either leaving something out of your description, or you're confused. MAC addresses aren't transmitted across the Internet. They stop at the first router they come to. Meaning in most sane situations only your DSL modem's MAC is transmitted, and it never leaves your ISP.

      It is orders of magnitude more likely that this was a precision flaw in the database. The laptop is at an IP address (not yours) that has a GPS associated with it that indicates the general location, but isn't sufficiently specific. It could be in your neighborhood, or your city, or your county, etc. It just happens to center on your home. (It has to center somewhere.) It's random bad luck. The "rednecks" involved simply looked up the "location" of that IP address, and made the faulty assumption that "X" marks the spot.

      For example, if you went to google maps and typed in your town name, it puts a pin there. And yet, you can zoom in to the neighborhood level, and see which house (or street) the pin is sitting on. That doesn't mean that that house is your city. It just happens to be the IP address in the database

      .

      My recommendation? Be armed with your forward facing IP address (ex: whatismyip.com). If this escalates, as the sheriff to moderate and verify that this address is different than the one that your accusers have.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    3. Re:The other side by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      I imagine though that the only way to locate things (GPS wise) would be for a smart phone w/ location services to report back to teh DB that "gee, I was at this location and I noticed an access point with the MAC of xxxxxxx... nearby"

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the time has come to have a MAC address changed randomly every week/month on router devices?

    5. Re:The other side by Tolaris · · Score: 2

      MAC addresses ARE recorded by Google Street View vans. They scan wifi as they drive. Have you noticed that your Android phone has location-aware services even with the GPS disabled? Part of that is done based on a fingerprint of wifi networks in your area.

    6. Re:The other side by sjames · · Score: 1

      This means the stolen laptop must be quite close to your location (or at least was at some point). That would be quite uesful for an investigation IF they understand that proximity to your house doesn't mean you have it.

    7. Re:The other side by UnoriginalBoringNick · · Score: 1

      If it was a macbook it would more likely be Skyhook, who mapped wifi networks before Google and I think they were used at least by the iPhone 3 before iPhones had GPS.

      I can't test it as my router is not reachable from a public road but apparently Skyhook has (or had) an api for geolocating from a wifi AP's mac address.

      https://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/get-the-physical-location-of-wireless-router-from-its-mac-address-bssid/

    8. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the Google car drives around again... Or a android phone syncing with Google is around... Or a laptop (w wi-fi) and you allow Google to see your location (via wi-fi triangulation)........ It's all relative...

    9. Re:The other side by ptudor · · Score: 1

      html5 geolocation tends to look at the MACs of nearby BSSIDs to assist in the triangulation. It's not just MaxMind-style tables of IP addresses anymore, check out Google Location Services (used by firefox). It combines four elements: IP addresses, Cell Triangulation, nearby access points, and GPS. Blaming wifi for misdirection is plausible, but it also indicates that stolen property was perhaps next-door or across the street.

    10. Re:The other side by laird · · Score: 1

      If they tracked a stolen laptop to your IP address, I would guess that it's in a neighbor's house and connecting to your WiFi. Rather than sending everyone away, you might want to suggest to them to try the neighbors.

    11. Re:The other side by capnkr · · Score: 1
      Street View vans/Google are the smaller part of it, I believe; I haven't heard of them 'sharing' the info the vans acquired...(but then, ???)

      Check out Skyhook Wireless, I think it would be a more likely source for the info:

      "To pinpoint location, Skyhook's Core Engine uses a massive reference network comprised of the known locations of over 250 million Wi-Fi access points and cellular towers. To develop this database, Skyhook has deployed drivers to survey every single street, highway, and alley in tens of thousands of cities and towns worldwide, scanning for Wi-Fi access points and cell towers plotting their precise geographic locations. Skyhook's extensive coverage area includes most major metro areas in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia."

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    12. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing your MAC address does nothing. It's the MAC address near the stolen laptop that has the wrong geolocation in some database. Someone living near the laptop's new location probably has a WiFi switch that used to be located near your current place (someone moved or sold their used WiFi switch).

      Unless, of course, you or one of your neighbors really did have the laptop, then changing your MAC address would have an effect.

    13. Re:The other side by circlingthesun · · Score: 1

      Android phones log nearby wifi hotspot MAC addresses and send them to Google along with GPS coordinates. Google's geolocation services can use this to triangulate your position using only surrounding wifi hotspots.

    14. Re:The other side by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      Wow, that failed miserably.

      Cancún, Mexico for my IP Address ... in Saskatoon, Canada.

      In a few months, when the temperature is -30C, I'm sure I'll be wishing that I live there...

    15. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're misunderstanding bozonian. There are databases of locations of wifi access points. Access point MAC addresses are stored in the database and associated with locations. His suspicion is that the db was returning an incorrect location (his house) for someone else's wifi.
      The culprit COULD be nearby, and the laptop is just seeing his wifi (not necessarily connecting to it) and thinking that it's in/near his house.

    16. Re:The other side by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      It is you that do not follow how things are working.
      Phones and other devices (computers ?) actually uses the MAC address of wireless access points to do geolocation. You do not need to associate, but the SSID being broadcast in the open does comes with a MAC address, which is what most wifi databases actually use. This database is built through wardriving, and probably updated with client software on a multitude of devices.

      A place like Copenhagen Airport tracks smartphones moving around with WiFi enabled, by the way of monitoring MAC addresses. They can anonymously follow you from arrival until you leave the airport. But it is used for congestion discovery and stuff like that, and to see where people are waiting or spending their time while waiting. MAC addresses is the hottest thing in WiFi location these days.

    17. Re:The other side by eldorel · · Score: 2

      Sorry gd3shoe, but you are misinformed.

      There are several databases that use the mac address and ssid of nearby wifi networks for geolocation. (android and iphone map applications both use these) How do you think that defices like the ipod touch (no gps) can give you approximate location data?

      Basically, your phone scans for networks, correlates the names and mac addresses of the nearby routers, connects this to current gps data, and then uploads that information to a server.

      Also, the mapping and camera cars google has driving around also scan for and log ssid/mac address data.

      In other words, someones lojack software is using google's geolocation api to locate the laptop using the mac address and ssid of nearby wireless networks, and the parent poster is probably the only network in the area that is also in the database.


      Google link
      Additional reference with some technical data

    18. Re:The other side by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, I think you're either leaving something out of your description, or you're confused. MAC addresses aren't transmitted across the Internet. They stop at the first router they come to. Meaning in most sane situations only your DSL modem's MAC is transmitted, and it never leaves your ISP.

      newsflash: the WIRELESS MAC address address might not be transmitted across the internet but it sure is broadcast via radio. Add Google street view//norc.eu//other gps+photography+wardriving service into the mix and you've got a gps-to-router_wifi_mac lookup database.

      refs:
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20005051-266.html
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-20009223-265.html
      http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/wifi-data-collection-update.html

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    19. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing the MAC is the right thing to do. Please read http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/25/android-map-reveals-router-location_n_853214.html and http://samy.pl/androidmap/ (if it still works).

    20. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more likely that they were using a wifi geolocation database which ties the MAC address of the base station to a GPS coordinate. Obviously this geolocation approach is only as accurate as the combined accuracy of the GPS measurement plus the wireless range of the base station in question.

    21. Re:The other side by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Same here for Luxembourg, Europe. Go figure. Perhaps US only?

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    22. Re:The other side by capnkr · · Score: 1

      I think the "Check Coverage in Your Area" thing you tried on the above linked page uses *street addresses* for the input field, _not_ IP's or MAC's. It is simply to show areas they have scanned so far. I imagine that for you to get the info they have collected, there is some sort of fee structure.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    23. Re:The other side by capnkr · · Score: 1

      They explicitly state that they have scanned parts of Europe. See the above answer re: the address input field.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    24. Re:The other side by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yes, I saw that. When I typed in my home address (not IP address), I got a lot of blue spots. However, I couldn't zoom close enough to see whether mine was listed. When I typed in my home IP, it didn't work though. Perhaps they mean to type in street addresses and not IP addresses? I have no idea.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    25. Re:The other side by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not if he was using DD-WRT. There's a bug in DD-WRT with certain routers that causes your Mac address to default to a generic one - the same MAC as several other people across the globe. His must be the current one listed in the database, but his isn't necessarily the only one with that MAC.

    26. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MAC address of all wireless routers are broadcast publicly (and this occurs whether you have security on or not, 'hidden' mode or not - there is no way to turn this off). All they need is to drive by and harvest using a wireless device with software that will display the MAC of any observed SSID's, and a GPS device, and they can store your MAC + the GPS location, accurate to 200' or so. In environments with lots of routers, you can even triangulate. See Skyhook Wireless for an example of an application based off a database of these MAC + GPS pairings.

    27. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true MAC addresses aren't sent outside a local network, but they are sent to clients connecting to WiFi routers. Databases of these MAC addresses and the (approximate) location of their routers have been made. Now if a software were to send the MAC addresses of routers it connects to someplace (could be as simple as sending an email), or the results of looking that address up, you can get a good estimate of where it's at.

      I think some take it a step further even and take the signal strength of multiple nearby routers and the results of the lookup and narrow down where it's at even better.

    28. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the one who is confused. Location services like Skyhook and google location APIs use the BSSID of wifi access points to provide rough location data. They do this by driving around and mapping the wifi foot print of a BSSID (ie the wifi ap's MAC address) and associate that with an address (roughly speaking) via GPS in the "scouting" vehicle. Changing your BSSID on your wifi ap is a reasonable step to take if these people are using software that uses these APIs to provide location data. That said, who knows how these hillbillies' laptop is reporting its location.

    29. Re:The other side by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      (1) Did you not see all the other comments posting the exact same thing?

      (2) Use your head. If Wifi triangulation was being used here, it implies that he actually has the stolen laptop. It's much more likely that something else is going on here.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    30. Re:The other side by sjames · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Is that one particular MAC address that should be filtered or is it a larg group of potential bogus addresses?

    31. Re:The other side by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Just one, I think. It uses the one baked into the firmware instead of reading the hardware due to some sort of flaw. So you either can modify the mac address in the firmware file, set it via script, or just give up and use a different alternate firmware.

    32. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you are probably correct, services like http://www.skyhookwireless.com/ would potentially tie location information to MAC addresses or at least SSIDs.

    33. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the way wireless geolocation systems work is the software picks up the wireless AP's broadcast, which includes the SSID and the MAC address of the device. They take that information coupled with the GPS coordinates where the AP signal is received and store it in a database. Later when the non-GPS device is trying to determine a location, the software looks for wireless signals, grabs the MAC, and compares it to the database. Its a very simple yet elegant solution.

      The GP poster changed the mac address on his APs, thereby breaking that location link in the database, at least until another GPS enabled device reports the new MAC addresses and submits them into the database.

    34. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bozonian was correct in everything he said. You... well, you're not entirely up to speed. For geo-location based on WiFi, the GPS coordinates are matched with the WiFi MAC addresses that can be seen and their signal strength from that point. That way, when a device tries to find itself, it does a wireless survey and phones home to see where it could be. It is possible that what you said happened, but Bozonian would have people knocking on his door all the time if that were the case, being at the center of his town. Of course your MAC address doesn't get transmitted over the Internet, no one said it did. He's talking about his WiFi MAC address, and that's what gets sniffed for geo-location and added to the database.

    35. Re:The other side by adolf · · Score: 1

      Skyhook is the service that my 1st-gen iPod Touch would use for location data. (I don't know about current Apple products, because I don't have any.)

      It doesn't work on IP addresses at all, but rather by listening for nearby 802.11 beacons and triangulating your location using their signal strengths, using MAC addresses (or rather, BSSID) to uniquely identify each access point.

      I was generally very impressed with its performance in rural Ohio. Pretty much within 100 yards, no matter what, as long as I had an open internet connection with which to query the database and at least one fixed Wifi signal. (I still think this is pretty awesome for a glorified MP3 player.)

      Google uses a similar method for their Android devices when GPS is unavailable. It located me in a downtown Chicago hotel within a few feet, with no GPS fix, but so far hasn't been as generally accurate as what I experienced with Skyhook's service on the old iPod.

      Wigle can be used for similar stuff, these days, and caters to those who enjoy wardriving.

      And there are others...

    36. Re:The other side by adolf · · Score: 1

      Wifi triangulation on my iPod touch (using Skyhook) would consistently place my location about a block away when I was at home.

      Good enough (and plenty impressive) for travel directions or a feeble attempt at "where the hell am I at?" on a device without GPS, but lousy for pinpointing the location of stolen goods.

      So, as to implications: It implies nothing except that the device thinks it's in the same neighborhood.

      I've seen Wifi triangulation be scary-accurate, but mostly it's way too coarse to determine which door to knock on (and it has no idea how accurate its result is, unlike GPS).

    37. Re:The other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be that the culprit was a previous occupant of his house and the wifi database hasn't been updated since they moved.

  20. SSH? by feranick · · Score: 1

    If you have sharing enabled, you might be able to connect via SSH and install a script that activates the camera...

    1. Re:SSH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not. That would depend on his network being configured to allow SSH traffic to that computer.

    2. Re:SSH? by dave420 · · Score: 0

      He's running LogMeIn, so that is not an issue.

  21. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    he is already using a macbook, a fannypack wouldn't make him look much gayer.

  22. Sneaky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take some commonly used shortcut of something and redirect the location assigned to that to the script. Tries to open safari or something and boom, gotcha :)

  23. Startup Folder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are worried he might see you running the script then stick it in the startup folder. I presume you have LogMeIn Pro so you can do file transfers without being seen but if not then you probably just have to run it yourself via remote control.

  24. OS X 10.7.2? by MBCook · · Score: 1

    Did you have the latest Lion update installed? When you install it and setup iCloud there is now a Find My iPhone for Macs, so they can report your location. I assume they use a WiFi geolocation database (since no Macs have 3G), but it would have given you and the police a good idea where the computer was. I believe it also lets you remotely lock the computer.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      it would have given you and the police a good idea where the computer was

      what then? they spend the day going around the neighborhood interviewing people. unless someone breaks down and admits to the crime, you are SOL. that is of course in a fairy dream land where the police would actually put any effort at all into the problem.

    2. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by otaku244 · · Score: 1

      Wish I did... :-(
      I'm kicking myself now b/c of those iCloud features

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    3. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I was right, there is a remote lock. This is also a remote wipe, so at least you can get your sensitive data off it.

      As for finding it, the little dot on the map is over my bedroom, so it's maybe 25 feet of from the real location. If you believe it's accurate, there are essentially only two apartments to check. If you go with the whole radius, there are maybe 8 apartments. It wouldn't be too hard to find, especially since I can make it play a sound, a quite noticeable beeping. Stand outside the apartment you think it's in, put your ear to the door, make it beep... you've got decent proof.

      It may not be perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than "It's somewhere in *large_meto_area*, unless it's been moved".

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      As for finding it, the little dot on the map is over my bedroom, so it's maybe 25 feet of from the real location.

      that's by coincidence. you don't get that accuracy from a wifi database. worse, it can be misleading. people see a definite dot on a map when in reality it could be someone within 200 feet of that dot.

      If you believe it's accurate, there are essentially only two apartments to check.

      anyway, even if it had a GPS lock, it's +/- 5 meters theoretical. in practice it can be off by quite a lot (100 feet or more), so that isn't even enough to say for sure.

    5. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by Yaur · · Score: 1

      If you already know where it is from the IP look up all you need is a car, your laptop's WiFi MAC address and some tool that will sniff it out of the air. Then you can go to the police with physical evidence that it is where you think it is.

    6. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      Remotely locking your computer is worse than pointless in the case of theft, if you ever want to get your machine back.

      It did not cost your typical thief any money, and they don't care in the least about the data (unless they stole it because it has a credit card database or something).

      Once they find out it's locked, they'll just throw it away, or maybe even destroy it. Everybody loses.

    7. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like he'd need his laptop to find his laptop

    8. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Just as a data point, when I run it on my iphone, the dot is a block away, and the circle covers maybe forty houses.

    9. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      PROBLEM IS, the remote lock does not let you put 120pt font on the screen at all times...

      LAPTOP STOLEN
      CALL 867-5309 for reward

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:OS X 10.7.2? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The accuracy certainly depends on the number of wifi hotspots currently in range, I'd think.

  25. Well, there is a way to get the police interested. by medcalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tell the police that you connected to the machine to try to track him down and found that he had downloaded child porn with it. Then, when they bust him and take the computer, you can file a claim with them. Kind of the nuclear option, but I bet it would work.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  26. Sorry, can't help you now. by Relayman · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You need to have a plan before the laptop is stolen, not after. I use a commercial solution that works directly with police departments to recover laptops. They don't just use IP addresses; they get a picture of the perp as well.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    1. Re:Sorry, can't help you now. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      The Prey Project is a free solution that probably does everything your commercial solution does, and more, except for the "working directly with police departments", which, in most parts of the US today, I would not trust anyway.

  27. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the economy the way it is, walking around with a Macbook Pro is asking to get ripped off. Carry around an older Dell, preferably Pentium 4 or older with Windows XP on it. Prancing around with a MBP is basically screaming STEAL FROM ME BECAUSE I CAN'T PROTECT MYSELF AND I'LL POST ON SLASHDOT!

  28. Filing False Police Reports is a Criminal Offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    in most (all) jurisdictions. Not a good a idea.

  29. The theif deserves this by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Not saying I ever would, but if I ever did steal a Macbook pro, the first thing I would do is remove the HDD. Failing the option of replacing the HDD, I would wipe it and reinstall. I have bought and sold many a computer and to anyone I have ever sold a machine to, I always recommend the same: WIPE THE HDD -- it's just good practice.

    People who fail to do this simple thing deserve what they get. They are trusting an unknown -- an computer with an OS and unknown software on it. One should know as much as possible about the machine they are using starting from the OS and then the applications.

    In a way, I guess it is good that most thieves are simply stupid as software solutions for recovering property seem to work often enough.

    But to me, it seems to be a fundamental failing of many criminals in that they don't plan to not get caught. Personally, I would never commit a crime without also planning not to get caught. This basic failure is just too common... I don't get it.

    1. Re:The theif deserves this by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I would almost think this would be the only option, unless the owner of the laptop doesn't have a password. I can't imagine the average laptop thief would know how to crack a password anyway, but would pass it off/sell it to someone that was somewhat computer savvy.

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    2. Re:The theif deserves this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antisocial Personality Disorder.
      People suffering from this disorder are much more likely to commit illegal actions and they also don't think of the consequences. Some of them rob banks without wearing masks because they just don't think that far ahead. They're very impulsive.

    3. Re:The theif deserves this by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >it seems to be a fundamental failing of many criminals in that they don't plan to not get caught.
      > Personally, I would never commit a crime without also planning not to get caught.
      >This basic failure is just too common... I don't get it.

      If they were that bright, then they might, you know, have a job (or at least be stealing more valuable items). (Laptop= likely crime of opportunity.)

    4. Re:The theif deserves this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here - as a tech, it boggles my mind that there are some many reports of this sort of thing. But hey, I'm a tech, and think about these things all day - I dare say that people who steal stuff just think about how to steal better, not so much what happens to it later on...

  30. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by toetagger · · Score: 1

    If I were the thief, I would claim that those pictures were already there before, and deleted them when I first saw them. Doesn't sound like great plan...

  31. logmein... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you said you have logmein installed on it. so whats stopping you from just remoting into the machine and running the script yourself?

  32. Which Vancouver? by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Vancouver, BC or Vancouver, WA? Knowing which country this happened in might help.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:Which Vancouver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my thought too. Vancouver, WA, or maybe a visitor and not a citizen. Stealing is very un-Canadian.

    2. Re:Which Vancouver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he enjoyed the area, so I assume Vancouver, BC.

  33. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by hedwards · · Score: 1

    When you consider jail time and court costs from file false paperwork with the police, you'd be better off just buying a new one and forgetting about the old computer.

  34. Blue Bloods by JustOK · · Score: 1

    It was on Blue Bloods just the other night. Offer to buy it back.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  35. Anyone remember this? by filmorris · · Score: 1

    This remembers me of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4oB28ksiIo , you may try something he did and at least have some fun, if not your laptop back.

    --
    "Hello, IT... Have you tried turning it off and on again? Yeah... No problem."
  36. van police are still looking for the cup rioters by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Vancouver police are still looking for the Stanley cup rioters so just finding some one who took 1 laptop likely is under that on the list of things to do.

  37. California Law by lymond01 · · Score: 2

    Just had a cop come by the university to discuss this. In California at least, photos like that are not admissible as evidence. They may allow the police to get your laptop back, but if you press charges those photos, keystrokes, etc are going to be thrown out before they ever see the judge.

    Don't you have Find My Mac or something like that on MacBooks? I thought logmein was more of a VPN thing.

    1. Re:California Law by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      I think Find My Mac is a new iCloud feature and he might not have set that up yet.

    2. Re:California Law by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just had a cop come by the university to discuss this. In California at least, photos like that are not admissible as evidence. They may allow the police to get your laptop back, but if you press charges those photos, keystrokes, etc are going to be thrown out before they ever see the judge.

      Don't you have Find My Mac or something like that on MacBooks? I thought logmein was more of a VPN thing.

      From experience with friends who've tracked down their laptops and mobile phones, throughout the US the police won't do anything in any circumstance. Even if you track down the identity of the person with your phone/laptop and get pictures of the thief using it, the police will tell you they won't do anything about it. Recovery comes from taking those pictures and then filing a civil suit, and that's not easy.

      However, if you have any influence with the police or know someone who does, the picture changes dramatically. With a policeman friend you can probably get it back in a few minutes by driving over to the thief's house with the policeman in uniform to make you more persuasive. Also, it's not that the police aren't allowed to help you once you've got strong evidence, it's that they choose not to do so.

      In summary, in my experience photos and IP logs and such will actually let you win in court (the thief won't even have a lawyer, so you don't need to worry about evidence being challenged as long as the judge is sympathetic) but won't get the police to do anything for you.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    3. Re:California Law by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Heck, I had a gun taken and pawned by someone w/o permission - they gave me the pawn ticket to get it back. Reported it as stolen, provided the PD w/ a copy of their drivers license and SSN card, no results. Did get the gun back from the pawn shop... but barely.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:California Law by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      P.S. :

      >are going to be thrown out before they ever see the judge.

      Hmmm.... and whom exactly do you think it is, who "throws things out?" The Court Janitor perhaps? Which Cal school are you at? And why did this cop come to visit you?

    5. Re:California Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez kids, keep your panties on. He cited applicable law but don't expect me to remember the statute (it might have had something to do with how the evidence was acquired) and I believe it was specific to California (not that other states don't also do this). And who "throws things out" are the lawyers who tell you up front that if you want to press charges you can't use this as evidence.

      And, the police at the University will indeed work with the computer tracking companies to find laptops. He gave an example where he was shown where the computer was being posted for sale, found the IP, got the subpoena to search DHCP records from the ISP, found the address, recovered the laptop. Also showed another case where the search was not conclusive because of the wireless issue someone noted above (could have been anyone in the apartment complex).

    6. Re:California Law by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      I had a laptop taken from our property. The computer was logged in through SSH into the server, so I even knew the exact time that the laptop disconnected (went out of range of the wireless router). I was arriving home at nearly the exact same time with my boyfriend, and at pretty much the exact same time as well, a witness saw my boyfriend's brother exiting our property. We even had a temporary restraining order against my boyfriend's brother. Missing along with the laptop were legal papers and evidence in a briefcase that could only be useful to my boyfriend's brother. Later that day, my boyfriend's brother even called up the witness attempting to convince her to lie to the police about ever having seen him, and she reported this information to the police.

      What happened? "No one saw your boyfriend's brother with the actual laptop (as it was in his backpack) therefore, we have nothing to work with."

      So, we knew the exact time of the crime, we knew who did it, yet because of varying amount of police apathy, nothing was ever done about it...

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    7. Re:California Law by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      I had the opposite experience...the theft occurred in a store that had security cameras and I was able to determine where the thief was staying. A officer at my local police was happy to go look at the footage and go confront the guy. It could have helped that I had everything laid out for him, but even before I had the location the officer was going to go look at the tapes and try to ID the guy. I know in the majority of cases, you're right (we've heard too many of those stories here on /.), but time time it mattered to me, my local police department was there for me.

      And it's exactly as you said, the guy didn't have a lawyer and plead guilty, so the evidence wasn't even involved.

    8. Re:California Law by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      throughout the US the police won't do anything in any circumstance

      Time and time again, this is what I see. And throughout the US, there's prohibitions against effectively protecting ones' self and property with the same type of force the police are legally allowed to use when they do choose to. Long-standing case law states that the police are not obligated to protect you or your property. They cannot be sued for failing to do so. And you aren't legally allowed to do so yourself... in some jurisdictions, there isn't even "castle doctrine" defense, and you must flee your home if it's intruded upon by armed attackers.

      Why do I, a citizen, pay taxes for police? Why do I, a citizen, tolerate this mandated "service?" I'm not 100% down with the various demands I've seen from the Occupy groups, but it's pretty clear, every time, that "our" police are tasked with the demands of the 1% rather than the 99%. They're very busy with consensual "crimes" and "don't have the time or staffing" for real crimes.

      So why am I paying for it?

    9. Re:California Law by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      You know what I see in common with all of these stories of unhelpful police? They are all civil offenses. Perhaps the solution is to call a lawyer not a cop. I wonder if the perpetrator had assaulted someone if the police response would be different, since that is a criminal offense.

    10. Re:California Law by phorm · · Score: 1

      Theft is a civil offense?

    11. Re:California Law by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      It isn't? I just assumed it was because it was a crime against another person's property. But IANAL so what do I know?

    12. Re:California Law by phorm · · Score: 1

      It is a criminal offense, so I don't see how civil offenses is the common meme for the stories of unhelpful police. Basically, is property is stolen, but it's not from some person/company important (a.k.a. has money), the response from law enforcement is less likely to be overly helpful.

      Now if a prototype iPhone goes missing, it's apparently enough reason to show up at some dude's house with a few borrowed police officers and demand a search....

    13. Re:California Law by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      I came back to post the same thing after doing some reading. Thanks for clarifying.

    14. Re:California Law by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Theft is a civil offense?

      (Yes, I'm giving an answer other people have given, but with a few extra details.)

      No, theft is a criminal offense, but there is a civil tort equivalent called "Conversion". If the police fail to press charges, a person can always sue in court. (In fact, nothing actually stops you from suing at the same time. Although, if the criminal case gives you restitution, then your damages will be ruled satisfied for the civil case, and vice-versa.)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    15. Re:California Law by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      You know what I see in common with all of these stories of unhelpful police? They are all civil offenses. Perhaps the solution is to call a lawyer not a cop. I wonder if the perpetrator had assaulted someone if the police response would be different, since that is a criminal offense.

      Ok, same parties. Boyfriend's brother was trespassed from our property, and signed a form saying he understood he was trespassed. He returned the following night and took the license plates from the vehicle that they co-owned. (one would say "steal", except he was a legal owner.) As a result Shoreline (a suburb of Seattle) pressed charges for a few things, and enacted a criminal-proceeding protection order. Boyfriend shows up at a house rented out to friends owned by boyfriend's brother, boyfriend's brother is there. Brother charges him, boyfriend retreats as per his duty. Brother throws rock at boyfriend, and hits him on the thigh. Due to protection order, any assault no matter how slight is a felony. Witness saw it and everything.

      Seattle declines to prosecute, because witness is afraid of being kicked out of his house (illegal, as per modus operandi of boyfriend's brother, his landlord).

      Protection orders in Seattle are nearly worthless... you here all these stories about people with protection orders continuing to be harassed, and police doing nothing, until the protected individual is killed by the respondent... I used to think the idea had to be rare, but after seeing how well Seattle handled them, I was no longer surprised at all.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  38. Did you just tip the thief off? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Hope you have changed the location and dates in your plea for help so that the thief reading Slashdot would not be tipped off.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Did you just tip the thief off? by BillX · · Score: 1

      If s/he were are proper slashdotter, the thief will have immediately wiped the machine (or at least nuked any obvious remote/location processes like logmein, vnc, preyproject etc.) before letting it touch the internet again.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  39. Startup Items Folder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    \\System\Library\StartupItems

    Any way you could use this?

  40. So is planting false evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Also, electronic intrusion and downloading child pornography.)

    But as long as you're racking up the charges, why not go whole hog.

  41. XTract can be used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Vancouver. First, let me say I am truly sorry one of our fellow citizens did this. Inexcusable. To take the picture you would have to use social engineering tactics and it would be hit or miss. What is far more likely is that the computer will be recovered using XTract. I co-architected and read this system for the VPD and RCMP. Most stolen property eventually ends up in the pawn shops. XTract is a system of mandatory reporting that links an item to an ID and later to as crime. Every pawn store in Vancouver must use it (if it gets pawned in Burnaby or Surey it won't work). Make sure you have your serial number and contact them and request a flag on your item.

    One other statistic I saw that was interesting is that many stolen Macs end up being brought in to the Apple store for service or repair. Apple doesn't help out here but contacting a few of the bigger chains in Metro Vancouver might help (Mac Station, Simply Computing etc).

    Finally - back to social engineering. If you had your email set to receive without authentification challenge, there is a possibility that the thief may read your email. I would first change this. That can be used to leverage trust and attack others.

    1. Re:XTract can be used by ekrock · · Score: 1

      Your apology is very thoughtful, but completely unnecessary. I'm sure that when a Canadian businessman brings a MacBook Pro to the lower 48, some kindly American will return the favor ... ;-)

  42. Take a lesson from DefCon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presentation from DefCon 18 by Zoz: Pwned by the Owner - What happens when you steal a hacker's computer
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4oB28ksiIo#t=3m15s

  43. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only... filing a false police report and potentially harming a minor charge because there is no way to tell if you or the bad guy was putting the images on the computer...

    Throwing down nukes is almost never the right thing to do in any case. Remote wipe your machine then file an insurance claim with home owners/renters insurance. You will have a nice new laptop which you can restore from your time machine. Then call Apple and let them know that your serial number was stolen. When he goes into a shop to get help putting stuff on it (because you killed the machine) they will call the cops.

  44. Thanks Everyone! by otaku244 · · Score: 1

    I know this is a long shot. It just makes me mad. I am taking all your suggestions down.
    I'm going to give this 30 days. If the work doesn't bare any fruit, I'll scratch up the money to buy a new one. If I catch the guy, you bet I will post an update on Slashdot!!!
    Thank you, again!

    --
    Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Thanks Everyone! by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

      It'll be long gone in a week. You looked for it on eBay yet? Check the local pawn shops too. If you find it at the pawn shop, they sometimes require the person hocking it to show ID (in case the merchandise is stolen) at which point you can call the cops. Whether they force the pawn shop to give you the stolen merchandise back in another issue.

    2. Re:Thanks Everyone! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      How often does an eBay post include the serial number? It sure as hell won't be listed as "Stolen Macbook Pro ... lulz". How are you supposed to know that any MBP from Vancouver is the stolen one? It's not exactly Mayberry. There are nearly 580,000 people in the city and over two million in the metro area. I'm sure some other MBPs exist there.

    3. Re:Thanks Everyone! by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      How often does an eBay post include the serial number? It sure as hell won't be listed as "Stolen Macbook Pro ... lulz". How are you supposed to know that any MBP from Vancouver is the stolen one? It's not exactly Mayberry. There are nearly 580,000 people in the city and over two million in the metro area. I'm sure some other MBPs exist there.

      They usually post the model number, a description, and typically a picture. Just search eBay based on the screen size and/or model, plus location of seller. Searching for Mac Book Pro within 50-miles of Vancouver WA turned up 14. Searching within 50-miles of Vancouver, BC was 7. Obviously if it was posted prior to being stolen you can skip that one. Then just ask the sellers for the serial number as you want to check if it's still under Apple warranty.

    4. Re:Thanks Everyone! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      And you just assume whoever doesn't respond in a timely manner has the stolen one? Or that they won't lie?

      Oh, and if you're thinking you'll buy all the wrong ones just to see if the serial numbers really do match, then why worry about the value of the one laptop? And why wouldn't they just lie and tell the nosy buyer it's already sold and out of warranty anyway? You do realize the thief knows it is stolen, right?

    5. Re:Thanks Everyone! by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Serial numbers can be checked on the Apple web site. I'm not saying this is foolproof, but instead of sitting on your thumbs and feel sorry for yourself, why not look on eBay and Craigslist to see if you get lucky?

  45. Obvious by thelonesun · · Score: 1

    Since macs have a webcam, use photobooth, take a pic, screenshot the pic on your computer through logmein.

  46. LOL yea your going to catch the guy by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    That shit was in a pawn shop 20 minuets after it was stolen

  47. Another approach by whoisisis · · Score: 2

    I just encrypt my hard drive. If a thief nicks my laptop, all he's going to get is a piece of (old) hardware and a disk full of seemingly
    random numbers. While it's annoying, you don't need to put resources into tracking the bastard, just get on
    with it and buy a new machine, which you would anyway.

    Hardware is cheap. Data is your time, work and money, so protect it with encryption and keep backups.

    1. Re:Another approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most cases frequent backups are more important than encryption. The lost data is usually much more valuable to the victim than to the thief.

    2. Re:Another approach by whoisisis · · Score: 1

      With encryption you don't even have to think about it. You can just forget you ever owned the computer.

    3. Re:Another approach by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      What he said. Unless your data is extremely critical and confidential, full-disk encryption is absolutely the worst thing you can do in the case of theft, because you will never see your computer again.

      It didn't cost HIM any money, so he doesn't care. With an encrypted disk, the thief will simply throw the computer away or destroy it, without hesitation. You can just kiss it goodbye.

  48. Re:Be Proactive by shentino · · Score: 1

    Then I'll just pull a gun on you and make you cut it loose.

    The only real defense against getting robbed is to not have anything worth stealing.

  49. 49th parallel? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    54' 40" or fight!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:49th parallel? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      54' 40" lead?

  50. Next time... by guruevi · · Score: 1

    When you have Lion, make an iCloud account and use Back To My Mac and Find My Mac to find your computer. Also, make sure to encrypt your computer and you can lock or wipe it remotely. Sure it's not perfect but it will help a lot with recovery or at least make sure you don't lose important data to others.

    If you leave it in a hotel or so, there are those locks you can tether around a desk or so, some upper scale hotels have them at the front desk. It will help against unwanted removal of your device.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  51. Why so much focus on putting files on the machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it just as, if not more, valuable to get files off it? Perhaps the thief will have already taken a photo of himself, or someone he knows, with Photo Booth? Perhaps he'll have created some type of document with his name. Perhaps...

    I can't help but think that there are thousands of files that could identify me on my computer and you just need the thief to create one.

  52. Just wait and watch... by anom · · Score: 1

    Can logmein allow you to watch but without touching without his knowledge?

    You know he'll log in to facebook at some point...

    1. Re:Just wait and watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not possible. A few things happen to the GUI once someone assumes control.

      OTOH, you might be able to obtain cookies from the browser.

      Also, renaming your script to "Secret Home Movies" and placing it on the desktop may be all you need to have it run.

  53. Cheapo Netbooks by ironjaw33 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Incidents like these are one good reason I use a cheap netbook when on travel. Not only are they light and get substantial battery life, but if it breaks or gets stolen, I'm only out $300.

    I also find that I rarely get much actual work done when on travel, so I don't have the need for a more substantial laptop. I guess if you've really got the need to travel with a full sized laptop, you could mod the case to make it look scuffed and dated and hence not worth stealing. Either that, or get a ThinkPad -- even the latest versions look 10 years old.

    1. Re:Cheapo Netbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does buying a cheapo netbook keep someone from stealing it while allowing you the same cpu and memory capabilities of the macbook pro while running OSX?
      Some people have a macbook pro because the desire is to have the same computational power and abilities while mobile.

      It's best not to have the mindset that you shouldn't have nice things because someone might steal it.

    2. Re:Cheapo Netbooks by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      It's best not to have the mindset that you shouldn't have nice things because someone might steal it.

      In an ideal world, this would be true. Unfortunately, the reality is that any place that attracts travelers also attracts thieves. Thinking that nobody is going to try and rip you off while traveling is a big mistake to make, even if you try do to all the right things to protect yourself.

    3. Re:Cheapo Netbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but... when I travel I want to appear cool.

  54. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the fact that the laptop will spend five years in an evidence locker before he gets it back....

  55. Do the same thing the RIAA does... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    File for a court order that allows search and seizure by law enforcement. Once you have that, the LogMeIn data is a usable piece, hopefully. If it is, case closed.

  56. An easy solution... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I provided the IP address to the VPD, but they say that laws don't allow warrants solely on the physical address tied to an IP."

    Just tell the VPD that you have the latest unannounced Apple uber-puter that you lost. That'll get the police moving right-quick!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  57. Hidden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can login to the machine, you could install the application called "Hidden" that will locate your stolen Macbook computer, collect photos of the thief and screen shots of the computer in use. http://hiddenapp.com

  58. Two Logmein features might be usefull. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logmein shows you for how long the keyboard and mouse were inactive and you can blank the screen and disable the local keyboard/mouse input (at least on a PC).
    There's a chance you could install the software mentioned by previous posters.

  59. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bet you wear a fanny pack, huh? i'm quite sick of this metrosexuality fad.

    Huh?

    The majority of fanny packs I've seen (including mine) are holsters. I wasn't aware that carrying a Glock around was the new trendy fad.

    Pwnd? Does lend a bit more respect to fanny-pack, wears, cause you don't know what it's holding :)

  60. Back to Mac? by Ian.Waring · · Score: 2

    I seem to recall an Apple Store employee managing to connect using BacktoMac to her stolen Mac and remotely taking a picture. Only gotcha was the count down to the pic being taken appearing on the screen in front of the thief. She did recognise the guy as someone who came with friends to a party at her house, and duly got her machine back. At the time, needed MobileMe to work...

  61. apple will make this interesting by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    while find-wipe-lock tech has been around for a long time, apple is making it standard issue. it will be interesting to see how law enforcement handles this. where for the most part iphone thefts have gone unpoliced, you are now going to have almost every user reporting the theft with enough evidence to find the perp. will law enforcement respond with an army of high-tech detectives to chase down these thieves? not likely.

    i don't understand why apple / at&t / verizon don't just band together to squash this. if an IMEI and a police report are submitted, simply do not allow the phone to be used on any carrier and do not let it connect to any apple server. well, i do understand. this would require apple et. al to spend resources to make this happen. now, a stolen iphone is really just another sale when the stolen item is replaced. not a lot of incentive.

    1. Re:apple will make this interesting by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      So I can, for instance, sell an iPhone on Craigslist, cash deal, and then report it stolen?

      My local cafe finds an iPhone, calls the numbers in it, holds it for a month, tries to sell it (hey, they're not a high-revenue operation) and finds that the owner has reported it "stolen" because they took the insurance upgrade from the carrier? Nice.

      While you start out ok... carrier locking has some issues. Many carriers do it on their own phones (it may even be, that they want to prevent fraud on users parts), but a national database seems to be a serious "overstretch."

    2. Re:apple will make this interesting by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      sir, please do not ever turn to a life of crime, your post shows you will be quite bad at it.

      So I can, for instance, sell an iPhone on Craigslist, cash deal, and then report it stolen?

      yeah i suppose, just like you can today. if you are trying to have someone pay you for a phone and then have the police get your phone back, having "find my iphone" isn't giving you much as you already have the person's email and phone number, name, a physical description, and maybe other things as well. all of those things are worth more to the police than a blinking dot on a map.

      anyway, if you are willing to file a fake police report thereby committing a crime yourself, and you made sure the buyer didn't get a receipt and didn't pay by a check and didn't correspond with you in any way that could be traced like oh, the phone, email, voicemail, texts, or anything else ... then you might be able to make that work.

      My local cafe finds an iPhone, calls the numbers in it, holds it for a month, tries to sell it (hey, they're not a high-revenue operation) and finds that the owner has reported it "stolen" because they took the insurance upgrade from the carrier? Nice.

      wow that's confusing. am i suppose to be looking at this from the businesses' point of view? the business that is being deprived of the "privilege" of illegally selling lost merchandise that was left at their place of business? do you recall the whole iphone 4 prototype fiasco? where the guy found an iphone proto and sold it? it was on the news again recently, he was convicted (he only got community svc, but none the less).

      and if you are looking to collect on the insurance, why would you leave it in a cafe? why not just dispose of it such that it'd never be found? heck, if you are going to commit insurance fraud, you'd better not have it on record that the place that was trying to return your phone was calling and emailing you.

    3. Re:apple will make this interesting by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Please, non-sir, take a course in elementary logic.

      You proposed that ALL carriers should lock out IMEIs "reported stolen." I'm replying that that is absurd.

      No police will *ever* investigate a stolen iPhone under normal circumstances, without someone seeing the theft. I'm sitting here will a Lieutenant, so believe me. What happens much more often, is that people "report" their phone "stolen" to their carrier, and file a police report, to get the "free" insurance upgrade.

      Turning off those phones is a little stupid, no? Not to mention the huge liability risk, of allowing one carrier to turn off another carrier's phones, based on a third-party report? Are you kidding?

      No one investigates these things, no one checks the record of calls-- perhaps, just perhaps, the outsourced call center dummy in the Philippines or India glances at the record of calls after the "theft," but no one is going to be doing an investigation. Over $300? Are you kidding?!?

      Most fraud units won't look at anything less than $10,000. So, in the real world, you know, people may not plan to ditch their phone to get another, and just decide dumping it in a cafe, restaurant, lobby or parking lot. They may just "leave" it somewhere, and just not try to get it back. It's called "opportunity," or "lying to yourself." Or even-- I left it in the cafe across town, that's a 90-minute trip, I'd rather just collect the insurance.

      Finally, most jurisdictions allow found property held for a reasonable period, sometimes as low as 7 days, to be claimed by the establishment and used or resold. C'mon.

    4. Re:apple will make this interesting by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      Yes, they will. My wife's iPhone was stolen, and I was able to pinpoint it to an exact address. Called my local cops, gave them the info, and they contacted the cops in the city the phone was in. 20 minutes later I had a call from one of those cops on the way to the house who asked me to re-enable it (I had disabled it via AT&T's website after my texts asking them to return it went unanswered) so if they denied having it he could call and see if he heard it ringing. As it was, before he could even speak, when they opened the door, they said, "You're here for the phone, right?" We had it back within maybe 3 hours of losing it. So, yeah, when you can tell them exactly where it is, they will go look for it. At least where I live (Chicago suburbs). YMMV.

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    5. Re:apple will make this interesting by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is typically allowed in many US states after some period to dispose of found property as you choose if the owner cannot be determined.

      Take a look at the Wikipedia page for Lost, mislaid, and abandoned property. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost,_mislaid,_and_abandoned_property

      What constitutes abandonment of course varies from one jurisdiction to another.

    6. Re:apple will make this interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered why this isn't standard... call me a cynic, but look at it from the manufacturer's point of view. Currently, if your computer or phone is stolen either you or (if you're lucky) your insurance buys you a new one.

      Of course, they *could* build in tech that lets you recover your property, but what's in it for them, other than a lost sale?

  62. Prey Project by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    So, for your NEXT laptop, try this:

    http://www.preyproject.com/

    It's an open source tracker (with the obvious caveats that come with tracking software), but the nice thing is, you can point it to a server you control, rather theirs if you so choose. My MBP was stolen from my car (wife didn't know my bag was in the back, parked the car at a hotel lot. One busted window later....), and a very similar one (missing the extended power cord that I still had no less) showed up on craigslist a couple days later with a weak story behind why it was being sold. I told the cops, but local cops wouldn't go out of jurisdiction without better proof, the local (to seller) cops wouldn't show without better proof, and the state cops weren't going to get involved over the value. They said if I could prove it was mine (by buying it back) they could prosecute.

    Sadly, a $1500 laptop, even though you may consider it "your life" just doesn't make the police drop everything. Your best bet is to be able to overwhelm the police with evidence, and prey will help you do that. In the end, the lesson is that your data comes first (back it up early, often, and everywhere), your safety comes second (if you want to get it back face to face, bring a weapon and be prepared to use it. and I don't mean show it off like a hollywood badass. I mean take another human beings life in exchange for the laptop you already planned on getting rid of in three years, or get shot yourself), and your hardware comes third. Anyone that's committed themselves to stealing isn't going anywhere in life anyway. Odds are they're not going to live to a ripe old age where they can regale their grandkids with tales of snatching bags. Live and learn, even if it enables the assholes of the world.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  63. Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have your password, or are you to Mac-Hip for one of those? Screw the hardware....are they accessing your personal stuff??

  64. just check his facebook status by paulatz · · Score: 2

    If I got it correctly, LogMeIn is some kind of remote-desktop application. If this is the case, just fire up the browser and check facebook, chances are he logged in as himself and left the session open. You may also be able to upload the browser history somewhere (e.g. dropbox) than retrieve it and analyse it.

    --
    this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  65. Back to Mac instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://images.apple.com/mobileme/docs/L358808A_BackMac_UG_v3.pdf

  66. tape on the webcam by quickgold192 · · Score: 1

    What laptop thief doesn't put tape over the webcam until wiping the drive? It seems like every week I see a new thief caught by having his picture taken; blocking that would be the first thing I'd do.

  67. It's gone man, its gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That laptop has been pawned already for heroin money and the ip is probably a starbucks since the thief is most likely homeless. it sucks but its true.
    mac are shiny and junkies like shiny.

  68. The IP address is unless anyways by animepunkw · · Score: 1

    Unless he is using your internet connection the IP address on the Laptop would of changed. Keep a record of your serial number before hand, report it, then pick it up at what ever pawn shop it was dropped at.

    1. Re:The IP address is unless anyways by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Logmein tracks IP address changes through the client software.

  69. Violence by ewhenn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

    1. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chances are you'll punch an innocent victim instead of the thief. Well... not so innocent, since they probably bought the laptop in a MacDonalds car park together with a painted wood iPad, but still.

    2. Re:Violence by kaizokuace · · Score: 4, Funny

      smashing his face in whilst yelling "IM A PC MUTHAFUCKA!"

      --
      Balderdash!
    3. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an 'interesting' course of action, but you would probably be killed when the bat was wrestled from you and then used to crush your skull. Your body would then be dumped in a remote area where it would be eaten away by scavengers and insects.

      You see, when giving such great advice it's always good to know the repercussions of your actions.

    4. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Holy shit, how did this get +5? Yeah, that's real smart... Risk killing someone and going to jail for a few years over a *laptop*. A laptop isn't worth resorting to violence over. Just buy a new one, move on, and keep a better watch on it in the future. Anyone who resorts to violence over a laptop doesn't belong in society.

    5. Re:Violence by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Most States don't give you the legal freedom to do violence to someone after the fact over property. Texas used to I think, I am not aware of anywhere else. I agree if someone tries to take property from I am going to fight, and make them regret they ever even thought about mugging me. Going after someone though over something like a stolen laptop is stupid because you WILL get prosecuted over it and it will cost you way more than a new laptop would.

      Someone appropriated my GPS, I left in unlocked(stupid) car on my drive way. Now I live in a lilly white suburban neighborhood so I figured I'd be dealing with most likely some stupid kid. I watched Craigs list for a few days and sure enough my exact model appeared a few blocks away. I called the poster said I was interested and wanted to come take a look. I matched the serial number to the warrantee card I had at home. I told the kid, listen I have the registration card at home and when phone the cops, they are going to wonder why I have that and why my name is on file with Garmin, we both you took it out my car last week so I why don't we both be cool and just let me take this home, and have nothing more about it. Otherwise I am going to police. He was smart enough to recognize that was probably the best option for both of us. \

      Frankly I doubt the police would have done anything useful. After all the kid easily could have said I sold it to him or something. I certainly was not going to do any sort of violence over a $130 bit of kid either, the potential risk to me is way to high. I did suggest as I left he stay away from my car and home in future, because if he was unfortunate enough to be seen by me on my property I would assume he was up to no good and shoot him.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    6. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are lucky you are only an internet blow hard, because otherwise you would quickly go to jail or be beaten up yourself in the same way by someone like yourself due to your attitude (who would then himself go to jail). You may not be aware, but the fact that you were retaliating for theft will count for precisely nothing when the thief sues you for all you've got - and rightfully so. Or do you imagine the thief can't know who you are, having had your laptop for all that time?

    7. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, get over yourself, as well as your material burdens. For your own sake.

    8. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down Mr Wu, Vancouver cocksucka may have a lot of juice.

    9. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Course, you are sure you hit the right person.

    10. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, and risk spending time in a Canadian prison? Do you know what happens there?

    11. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...unless you end up breaking the face of an innocent man who paid $500 to buy a lap-top from a guy he didn't know was a thief. Oops. There is actually a reason for due process.

    12. Re:Violence by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you got your laptop back and broke some bloke's legs, but now you're serving seven years for felony aggravated assault and battery. Nice.

    13. Re:Violence by Theaetetus · · Score: 2

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      I think we've found the Editor in Chief of Internet Tough Guy magazine.

    14. Re:Violence by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Actually I saw this happen when someone tried to grab and dash an EeePC from my friend at a train station. The security guard who witnessed the event eventually stepped in and asked him to stop kicking the offender.

      It's actually quite a poetic sense of justice that you can beat up and kick a guy who is down in public without anyone stopping you... provided they all know HE's the badguy.

    15. Re:Violence by Kittenman · · Score: 1
      Ah, the USA ... land of violence and the lawsuit. Rather than just letting you hit him repeatedly with a baseball bat, and rolling over to give you a better angle on his kidneys, he'll just pull out his a) gun or b) knife and kill you. We know he's a lowlife so it's likely he'll be carrying something.

      Remember - this is life, not hollywood or a game.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Thanks for that bug report, let me submit this quick patch:

      s/'baseball bat'/'glock 9mm'

      that should do it

    17. Re:Violence by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I know a few of my biker friends who have paid the local $275 fine for simple assault. Jail is expensive, so if it can be played off as mutual affray or similar you might luck out.

      You have to have a pretty good idea of the ROE, but yes you can beat the fuck out of some folks under the right circumstances. Helps to have friends who will lie convincingly.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re:Violence by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      And when he charges you with assault and battery - you'll wish you hadn't. Is ten-to-twenty and a felony on your record a fair trade?

    19. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, thieves and theft of property don't bother you guys at all, huh? Gee, I wonder why crime is up? Well, probably because there are no repercussions, with pussies like you guys.
      Violence IS the answer. If enough people get maimed, crippled, or killed over stealing laptops or such, believe me, there would be a lot less of that happening. At least Fred (who stole my laptop last year) would think very hard before stealing again, and would be glad that he now had the ability to predict the coming of rainy weather, from those aching bones I broke for him. They never do quite mend all the way.
      Turn the other cheek and forgiveness are wonderful qualities, but unfortunately they just encourage thieves. I believe in live and let live, but I DON'T believe in letting people get away with crimes. You have to do more than inconvenience the criminals - you have to make the rest of their lives a living hell. That's the only thing some of people understand. And even that may not stop them from committing another crime - at that point, we should just kill them, as they are obviously of no benefit to society. We are all a part of society, and we need to learn to live within it. Want to be an outsider? Ok, that's fine, as long as it doesn't negatively impact anyone else, but if you decide to be a criminal, sorry, you get no sympathy from me.

    20. Re:Violence by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      *horrified whisper* The ....syrup...it was everywhere....

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    21. Re:Violence by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Enjoy your 5 year stint in prison.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    22. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did suggest as I left he stay away from my car and home in future, because if he was unfortunate enough to be seen by me on my property I would assume he was up to no good and shoot him.

      So, the THREAT of violence works just as well ??

    23. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree. Sick and tired of people stealing stuff and then just getting released. I will exercise my rights as a juror and will absolutely NOT convict you for it !

    24. Re:Violence by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Dude, and risk spending time in a Canadian prison? Do you know what happens there?

      To the best of my knowledge, they fart on you a lot.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    25. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most States don't give you the legal freedom to do violence to someone after the fact over property.

      This doesn't require "legal freedom", this is a natural law endowed to us by The Creator.

    26. Re:Violence by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > I will exercise my rights as a juror and will absolutely NOT convict you for it !

      The problem is, in most jurisdictions, you as the juror would never be allowed to KNOW the circumstances that led to it. You'd go to court, watch the trial, see the defendant get torn apart, vote to declare him to be guilty, then go home, read the evening news, and find out that you convicted a guy for doing something you approve of. In case like this, both the defendant and prosecution go into court tightly scripted, with the defense under constant threat of a mistrial if they so much as HINT that there's a backstory that might influence the jury to find him not guilty for reasons not officially approved of by the court.

    27. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Wow, to many Hollywood movies eh, "Violence is never the answer".

    28. Re:Violence by Courageous · · Score: 2

      There's also the possibility they are both innocent AND armed. This will be very, very bad mojo for the poor sorry soul with the baseball bat. The law authorizes quite a lot more force for use in self defense than what they even authorize as reasonable force for a police officer. In short, if someone is attacking you with a baseball bat, in most states you can "fill 'em full a' lead." Or "spill their entrails upon the ground, most untimely". As the preferences in personal weapons thereby dictates.

    29. Re:Violence by Courageous · · Score: 2

      Heh. I would offered to buy it, and when checking it out, said "I'm taking this and not paying you" to see if he would call the cops. With ownership material in hand, and cops in tow brought by the kid, that would be pretty god damn funny. He'd be caught in a dead cold lie, which would be adequate grounds for arrest, because he wouldn't be allowed at that point to change his story to something else. That is... of course... if you wanted to arrange that outcome. Still, you should have probably told his parents.

    30. Re:Violence by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a moment of sanity.

    31. Re:Violence by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      How come it's smart/ok to risk that for stealing the laptop?

      It goes both ways.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    32. Re:Violence by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but once you have the property back continuing to kick him is assault. You can't use more violence than necessary just because you're pissed.

    33. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an environment of police indifference or lack of resources I think this is the only responsible course of action.

    34. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because if he was unfortunate enough to be seen by me on my property I would assume he was up to no good and shoot him."
      I'll assume that was tongue in cheek. Here in Australia the stupid liberalists have degenerated criminal law to the extent he would be able to secure a restraining order against you for making that threats and keep the stolen GPS.

      We currently have a case where a teenage theif was shot (and died shortly after after the getaway car dumped him on the side of the road) during a home invasion and the homeowner is facing murder/manslaughter charges. Said home owner has been a person of interest to the police and is now publically reported as 'having a significent stash of weapons in his property'. Will be interesting to see how this case proceeds.

      I'm a fan of exposing the theifs identity and letting them keep the item until publically forced to surrender the stolen material. Fuck them, a 10yo knows not to steal, and a thousand other kids will observe him being messed up and be scared off doing the same thing. The medieval punishment of stocks in public was a good thing. Modern psychology has lost the old school efficiency in teaching the hard lessons of life.

    35. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "$130 bit of kid"

      On a side note, either state "I certainly was not going to do any sort of violence" or "I would assume he was up to no good and shoot him", but not both, or people will think you're a stereotype.

    36. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if one day you wake up without teeth and with broken legs, will you consider that all is well with the world, if in fact, you had stolen something?

      the kicker is: I would bet you any amount of money that you HAVE technically stolen something. Maybe it was worth only fifty cents. Still, breaking your legs and bashing out all your teeth is surely a "fair trade". After all, a laptop is also only worth fifty cents, as compared with broken legs and bashed out teeth. would you rather throw yourself or your laptop out of an airplane? no contest.

      also, what if it turns out that the laptop is itself paying for theft: what if the manufacturers used literally slave labor, which means stealing people's time. Or, if they ended up going bankrupt and never paid wages stolen. Then I'm sure you will consider if some marxist beats the shit out of you for your materialistic crimes, a fair trade. it can probably be shown that you already knew of the labor conditions you were paying for.

    37. Re:Violence by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      It's also in natural law that no man should be judge in his own case. (At least according to Hobbes)

    38. Re:Violence by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      SO a 10,000 dollar medical bill and permanent injuries are proportional to a thousand dollar laptop? The old testament allowed an eye for an eye but no more. If you cripple or kill someone over a fucking thousand dollars and there is no immediate danger to you, then you are by and large the bigger criminal.

    39. Re:Violence by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      ....also the person currently in possession of it is not neccessarily the/a thief. He/she might have bought it in good faith from a fellow student or something.

    40. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you idiots mod this idiot up? He obviously has never done anything like this and is just a basement dwelling bitch. Otherwise, he'd be in prison.

    41. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I told the kid, listen I have the registration card at home and when phone the cops, they are going to wonder why I have that and why my name is on file with Garmin, we both you took it out my car last week so I why don't we both be cool and just let me take this home, and have nothing more about it."

      it's like you only type every other word or something.

    42. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Tough guy on the internet, eh?

      I hope you don't genuinely believe that is the solution to the problem of a stolen laptop. Why do think most of the world dropped corporal punishment? Because even though it makes you feel better, it won't actually prevent the crime happening again, and chances are it will just leave criminals even more sociopathic / disenfranchised / desperate than they already were before.

      Also, your comment is indicative of somebody who has never comitted or been witness to any form of physical violence in adult life. If you hit somebody in the face with a baseball bat, you won't knock their teeth out - you will *kill them*. Contrary to what the movies might have you believe, the human skull cannot withstand an attack like that (unless the person with the bat was actually a child, or ridiculously weak i guess).

      But sure, murder and spending 25 to life in prison over a laptop is totally worth it. What a wonderful example you're setting for the younger members of this community...

    43. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.. you DID talk to his parents right?
      RIGHT?

      Seriously, it might have been 'easier' for you to just threaten him and get it back, but now he is still doing it to other people.

      The main issue with the world is, and has always been, when good people do nothing about the bad.

      Now his parents have no idea that you got the kid red handed commiting theft.

    44. Re:Violence by MasterPatricko · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, violence is the solution, If you are sure you know who it is, go to town on them. Give me a baseball bat and 5 minutes with any cocksucker that steals my shit, and he'll wish he didn't. Sure you might have my laptop, but I just knocked out all of your teeth and broke your legs. Fair trade.

      Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      I'd tell a UDP joke, but you may not get it. I'd tell a TCP joke, but I'd have to keep repeating it until you got it.
    45. Re:Violence by unixisc · · Score: 0

      I'd say that the one who steals the laptop doesn't belong in society.

    46. Re:Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that the one who steals the laptop doesn't belong in society.

      I'd say someone with no respect for human life shouldn't be in society.

    47. Re:Violence by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People CAN do whatever they can get away with. The evidence in this case showed that he could do it by virtue of him doing so. Australia is not as a litigious place as the USA. You don't typically start assault claims here with words like "Well just after I robbed him," or "It all started when he hit me back".

    48. Re:Violence by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      "Litigious" has to do with civil lawsuits. Assault is a crime, not a civil claim (at least in the US). Yes, people do get away with things. Yet you seem to confuse what one can do legally and what one can do physically, and you do so on purpose.

      BTW, what error of outrageous ego did you make that you assumed everyone would know from context that you're an Aussie?

  70. OpenCV + Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can access a shell on the machine, you can write a short python script using OpenCV, and a simple FTP server or something to send the files back to you.

  71. Surveillance Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find some software that does camera surveillance and can upload images/video to a FTP site. Check your Logmein when the thief is not using it (perhaps very early morning?). Install the software and wait. I use iSpy for this on a Windows netbook. I'm sure there is a Mac/open source equivalent.

  72. Try the DA by raist21 · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure how it works in Canada, and IANAL...but I believe in some jurisdictions in the US you can go directly to the District Attorney and have them investigate the matter. Particularly in cases where the local police authority are not doing their job.

    They may even balk at first on what's a seemingly small crime to them, but if you make a big enough nuisance of yourself, there's a good chance they'll do something about it, just to make you go away.

  73. LoJack for Windows/Mac for the next laptop you buy by BarneyRabble · · Score: 1

    Could have saved you some heartbreak if you installed LoJack for Windows/Mac...remote delete or recover your laptop, its a subscription service (1 year $39.99 USD) but your laptop would be screaming its location if it was installed...used it on mine.

  74. Undercover by philj · · Score: 1

    Install Undercover http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/. Assuming you buy another Mac :) Awesome bit of software.

  75. Re:Be Proactive by flaming+error · · Score: 1

    You're posting from jail, I take it. Because this sounds about as smart as hunting bunny rabbits with a cannon.

  76. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never used one.

  77. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't need to fuck a dude to figure out that you're straight...

  78. For once, a good reason to sue! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I provided the IP address to the VPD, but they say that laws don't allow warrants solely on the physical address tied to an IP.

    So, they have a physical address and refuse to act, or they refuse to get the physical address because they wouldn't be able to use it anyway?

    If it were me, with my current financial situation (I have a few thousand spare $$$, saving up for a large purchase), I'd hire a lawyer in Vancouver and sue. IP's not enough for a raid, but it is enough to subpoena the name/address from the ISP. Use that, and get the name/address. Sue him. With the information in your posession of the physical address, hire a PI to take a picture of him with a Macbook. With that, that will be sufficient for a warrant.

    The criminal process shouldn't let you raid other's places based on a single verbal report, and that's not a bad thing. Just sue and you'll be able to get enough for a criminal conviction at the same time you win a case against him for the loss to you (which you may not actually collect, but you'll feel better, and it should cost you $5000 or less, if you find a good lawyer and he's actually guilty.

  79. Too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read your post and decided to wipe the sorry mac os. I'm running linux on it now sucka!

  80. Undercover by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

    Cheap app. Shows your nicked Mac on a map. Takes mugshots of the person using it. Let's you lock/wipe the machine.

    Bit late now of course, the horse has bolted.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  81. Turn on location transmission by drolli · · Score: 1

    turn on location transmission and surf to goople maps.

  82. Just hack it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you have the IP addresse apparently. Which is why you should have setled on a Windows laptop.

  83. Schadenfreude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write on the facebook wall of every female friend of your thief something like... 'I just got the results of the test. How about you?'

    rinse and repeat

  84. Warning to Laptop Thieves: Read /. by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    ^^ WRT:
    >I actually had my business partner on the hunt and we tracked it down to 4th District Vancouver. ... we connected directly with 4th District,
    >we got a call back from a detective who pulled the case. This happened on Friday. I had already submitted to Slashdot the night before.

    (I don't think you can modify the original article)

    (You'd better hope the thief isn't reading)

    (Does the average laptop thief improve or lower /. quality)

    (Good Luck!)

  85. Re:Be Proactive by plover · · Score: 1

    this sounds about as smart as hunting bunny rabbits with a cannon.

    You obviously have no idea just how much fun that is!

    --
    John
  86. Posting Pics? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I promise to post pics of the guy if this get's[sic] pulled off successfully!"

    Be VERY careful posting pics... If the pics you post aren't those of the thief, you could find yourself on the wrong end of a very nasty lawsuit.

    1. Re:Posting Pics? by ff1324 · · Score: 1

      A nasty lawsuit saying what? "waaaaah! I was caught using stolen goods wearing nothing but my princess leia costume?"

    2. Re:Posting Pics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL but i don't understand why you would be at the end of a nasty lawsuit

      You took pictures using your own camera. Now if they sue you, either they have to admit they stole your laptop, or they willingly allowed your camera in. In the end, they'd have to admit you own the laptop.

      Even if they said they bought the laptop from someone else, they would have to track down the other guy or else you could probably just push the blame on them regardless if they took it or not.

    3. Re:Posting Pics? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      child porn.

    4. Re:Posting Pics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be parnoid... it will never happen!... :-P

  87. Re:OS X 10.7.2? (Remote Lock) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    > I believe it also lets you remotely lock the computer.

    Because, of course, you want the thief to turn it off, wipe the drive and never give you any more location data, ever.

  88. Re:California Law (^^ bogus) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    Your "cop" is a legal expert on admissibility, right? (I'd have called him a moron to his face).

    Either cite applicable law down to the statue, or stop blowing smoke.

  89. Undercover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do hope you get your laptop back. In the future, I recommend Undercover. http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/index.html
    You will need to lock down your laptop such that a person cannot easily just wipe the OS (Firmware Password), but beyond that it seems worth its price. I have never had to use it, but I have it installed and have tested it with good results. Sends photos of the person, IP address, and screenshots of what they are doing.

  90. Re:tape on the webcam...takes too much grey matter by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    >What laptop thief doesn't put tape over the webcam until wiping the drive?
    > It seems like every week I see a new thief caught by having his picture taken; blocking that would be the first thing I'd do.

    The piece of grey matter between your ears that gives you this idea, is likely also stopping you from becoming a laptop thief.

  91. Orbicule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google it.. For next time.

  92. Oh Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is such a nice laptop. I really wanted to keep it for myself. But now I see I'd better ditch it quick at the nearest pawn shop. But thanks for the couple days of fun.

  93. You have logmein on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. Now I'm not sure if this is the case with the Mac version but this will certainly with the Windows version. If you upgrade the subscription to LogMeIn Pro (you might even be able to wangle a free 7 day trial) you can get a command prompt / terminal session through your web browser and such like without letting the person know you are connected into the system. From there you could run your own scripts to do the job,

    Looking at the product matrix (https://secure.logmein.com/UK/comparisonchart/comparisonFPP.aspx) it doesn't say either way whether the remote terminal works on the mac, but the remote file manager feature is; so at the very least if you can remotely blag some log files or upload some scripts (some mac gurus would need to give some pointers on that one).

    I hope this helps.

  94. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well that situation is coming soon america lol!!!!

  95. What if the thief removes the HD and uses a new 1? by Glooko_Archive · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this question as mentioned or not. I've not read all the comments and skimmed the first 2 pages of comments. I did check out the Prey website and a thought came to mind which was not addressed in the F.A.Q there. What if the thief removes the HD and puts thier own new HD onto the laptop? If the thief was after just the hardware would that mean that the thief can't be tracked anymore if they throw the old HD away till someone finds or boots up the old HD? That also had me wondering about the Craigslist or the story someone mentioned about finding thier GPS in thier area. I often see lpatops for sale online on Craigslist and many times the ad says the HD is removed for security reasons. Yes that can be a valid reason if you are the rightful owner of the item and wish to remove your HD for privacy but that also had me wonder if the HD removed could be also because the person sellingi t could have stolen it and removed the HD just because of any tracking software on it could track them?

  96. Use the run-at-login option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the run-at-login option (in system prefs) to run the script every time he logs in

  97. Re:Be Proactive by wjsteele · · Score: 1

    "The only real defense against getting robbed is to not have anything worth stealing."

    Um... isn't this a perfect example of that not working???

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  98. Citizen's Arrest by WebManWalking · · Score: 1

    Canadian common law derives from British common law the same as the US's. You don't have immunity from prosecution the way the police do, but if it meets the criteria for citizen's arrest, and particularly if the arrest results in a conviction, you're unlikely to be prosecuted, criminally or civilly, for false arrest.

    It doesn't meet the usual misdemeanor criteria for citizen's arrest in most jurisdictions, because you yourself didn't witness the theft. But given the cost of the laptop, it probably meets the felony criteria. Meet with the VPD detectives and voice your intent to make a citizen's arrest. Ask for their advice about how to do it legally. Sometimes the thought that you might actually succeed is sufficient to motivate the police to get creative with stuff they CAN do, if only to get credit for the arrest.

  99. Re:Be Proactive by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    Umm? People get guns pulled on them/mugged for pocket change every day...

    I back this claim up with real world evidence of it happening to multiple of my friends.

  100. quite simply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can get a location go to the location the likely hood of it being a sleazy pawn shop is high or a fence of some sort... if it is a shop go in the shop call the police and have them come down with you legally pawnshops cant keep stolen merchandise if they bought it they cant even demand the money from you they are fucked and on top of that they can get fines for it...

    Call apple too report the sn stolen apple has been known to pressure the action of police to help in the recovery of stolen property...

  101. logmein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see how this is so hard.

    Write a program (or have it written, newb) that takes a photo with the webcam on system startup and emails it to you. You mentioned you had logmein installed. Just keep checking logmein until the laptop has been idle for a while (maybe at night or whatever). When the machine is idle, install it.

    Wait for the photos.

  102. Call the police up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and claim to have some pirated music on the laptop. I'm sure they'll raid the place immediately.

  103. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure is, OP said all he had was a macbook pro.

  104. Code of Hammurabi by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Good job, you're managing to live an ethos that was conquered nearly four millennia ago.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  105. Re:Be Proactive by peragrin · · Score: 1

    I don't know about majority but whenever I see a guy who looks to be a little off carrying a fanny pack, I watch it. if the pack seems to be fairly heavy (droops, makes thuds noisy when set down etc)I be sure to keep my mouth shut.

    It is easy to tell if some thing is heavier than it should be by how it is held, carried. So don't think you aren't being noticed just because it is out of sight.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  106. "laws don't allow warrants solely on theIP" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see if I got this right: 1) My laptop was stolen; 2) I know the (external) IP address of the network it is on at this moment; 3) I give the IP address the police; 4) They choose to do nothing about it because they cannot get a warrant. Man, can they make it any easier than this for the thiefs?

  107. Re:Be Proactive by PPH · · Score: 1

    So don't think you aren't being noticed just because it is out of sight.

    I don't really care if people in the know recognize it for what it is. Open carry is legal where I live. But the only reason I don't do that is that people unfamiliar with carrying and the law tend to throw a hissy fit when they see guns. Then they call the cops and the cops have to waste their time calming them down. And they don't appreciate having their time wasted by someone who could easily just hide the damned thing.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  108. If you have LogMeIn- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you log in and install Prey?

  109. Re:Be Proactive by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Umm? People get guns pulled on them/mugged for pocket change every day...

    I back this claim up with real world evidence of it happening to multiple of my friends.

    When your stuffed animals get robbed, technically it was you that got robbed.

  110. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  111. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

    That's a good option - report its serial to Apple as stolen, then remote wipe the machine, or do something that will make him take it in to be repaired.

  112. Re:Be Proactive by meerling · · Score: 1

    I know one guy with a concealed carry permit who's fanny pack is also a quick release concealed holster for his 9mm.

  113. Re:Cheapo Netbooks (Thinkpads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have bought USED Thinkpads (in the 1Ghz PIII class) for about $100, including shipping. They look well-used, but work perfectly. Sure, they aren't blazing-speed, but for e-mail and whatnot, they're perfect.

  114. Out(r)age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If true (sorry), it seems obvious that there's more behind the behavior of the police than this story describes. It seems as if this would be worth pursuing for some enterprising (crime) reporter. Personally, I'd be outraged over the ignorance displayed by the Sherriff's department as well as the originators of the GPS story/information.

    A) Where'd the information that led the sherriff's duputies to your door come from? I'd love to believe that there has to be some credible source or they wouldn't even have the option to pursue the "lead."

    B) How'd your home address find it's way to the individuals who followed up after the police had given up?

    C) If it's a "service" that people are paying for, I'd love to know what they are charging and what they are charging for.

    D) You presented a credible likelihood that the 'geolocation' was accomplished using your wifi MAC address, but what if it came from your ISP? There's always the possibility that one of the rednecks knows or is related to someone who works for your cable or DSL provider or whatever business you use as an ISP.

    E) Ask yourself how you'd feel if any of the people that showed up at your door hadn't been quite so civilized? And how are you going to feel when you read the story from someone else who was put in that position, should it come to pass, and you didn't try to find out who's behind this ridiculousness or press the issue with the Sherriff.

    As a matter of fact, what if it's the New York City PD using some half baked technology developed for their anti-terrorism campaign that's taken them outside jurisdictional and state lines?

    Good story, whatcha gonna do with it?

  115. re-image by aabrown · · Score: 1

    This "LogMeIn" - how well does it work after the smart thief re-images the hard drive before using the laptop?

  116. There's no apostrophe in "gets". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's actually rules regarding when and how to use apostrophes, and those who want to write like adults, and speak to other adults with their writing, should be careful. Don't depend on spell-check, it's no substitute for knowing the basics of English. I see many resumes come across my desk, since I do the bulk of the hiring for the firm I work for. Many of them have a good number of these errors. They misuse there/their/they're, transpose to and too, or your and you're. There's more, but those are the most common. You can be sure that those candidates never get an interview, we need people that write well, it MATTERS. I fear the educational systems aren't doing their job. Or is it the parents? Or maybe just lazy a**holes that think their net-speak's acceptable to everyone. Those that cannot write like adults, or just won't bother, should get comfortable doing menial labour.

    1. Re:There's no apostrophe in "gets". by aabrown · · Score: 1

      There ARE actually rules regarding correct grammar use! For example "There's actually rules" means "There is actually rules". So, perhaps before you criticize others, maybe you should check out the rules on "This-That-These-Those": http://esl.about.com/od/grammarforbeginners/a/This-That-These-Those.htm
      Also, I'm pretty sure it should be "lazy a**holes WHO think", and you need a period after "Those that (should be who) cannot write like adults.

      Based on your rules about who gets an interview and who does not, I believe sir or madam, you would not. Good day!

  117. Here is the first and MOST IMPORTANT step! by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1

    Find a well visited web site where you can discuss the details of your laptop's disappearance. This will not only enlist the aid of anyone who regularly follows that site but there is also very little risk because the Canadians are well known scofflaws and laptops disappear by the hundreds in Vancouver on a daily basis. There is no way that any Canadian could ever connect their shiny new laptop with your Slashdot post... I mean the odds must be less than like one in something...

    And secondly...
          Just admit that that Sharks sticker on your Mac was there to goad any Canucks fan who walked by and that the loss of your laptop is a small price to pay for having escaped Vancouver with your life.

     

  118. Mystery plot by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    That would make for a great plot. Some notorious burglar is found dead. insert stuff here. In the end the killer is the owner of a laptop that was stolen.

  119. Re:OS X 10.7.2? (Remote Lock) by torako · · Score: 1

    Yes, you do. The first thing to try would be to get a location and see if the police is willing to help. But if it turns out that there is no way of getting the laptop back, I would very much like my laptop to be wiped of all personal data I have stored on it.

  120. Re:Be Proactive by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

    Umm? People get guns pulled on them/mugged for pocket change every day...

    I back this claim up with real world evidence of it happening to multiple of my friends.

    I suggest you move.

  121. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how would you know he has childporn unless you downloaded it from him as well?

    also why so sure it's a he.

  122. law of jungle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just break into the thief's house, take your laptop then beat him to death. that's what I would have done to my moped's thief if it had an IP...

  123. Re:Be Proactive by pjabardo · · Score: 1

    Macs with linux are for gay hipsters!

  124. Adeona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could've tried using adeona to track him... the project page says it takes pictures on OSX http://adeona.cs.washington.edu/

  125. IPs would probably be changed by unixisc · · Score: 0

    You are assuming that the IP address will remain unchanged. The Mac address will remain unchanged, but not the IP address. If the thief takes it home or somewhere that he can get a connection, and assuming that he is computer savvy, why would he keep the same IP? He'd either go in, check it and change it if it is a static IP, as well as the gateways associated w/ it. In any event, in the process of trying to get that laptop connected, he'd have to lose the original IP of that Macbook, and that's how the VPD won't be able to id the machine. (All this assumes that the original owner had a static IP associated w/ his account, instead of a dynamic one that changed every time he logged in.)

    Is it possible to remotely use the MAC address of a machine to spot its location? If yes, that would be a better chance of claiming that the machine is actually yours. It's something that the thief presumably cannot change. Although I wonder how many people write that down and store it just like they store their various account numbers?

  126. Re:Be Proactive by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    When your stuffed animals get robbed, technically it was you that got robbed.

    Who is going to rob a stuffed animal? I don't know about you, but my teddy-bears have even fewer possessions than I do, and certainly less money. (Though, to be honest, I have never succeeded in converting my net lack of wealth to teddy-bear money.)

  127. Upgrade to PRO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgrade to LogMeIn Pro to have the ability to run scripts, change admin passwords and get more access to the system.
    The Pro version updates automatically when you add it to your account through their webpage, so no use interaction is required.

  128. remote in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have logmein, log in and activate your webcam, in the record phase. Then email it to yourself when he walks away.

  129. Not PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I promise to post pics of the guy if this get's pulled off successfully!""

    How do you know it's a guy?!?!? It could be a chick!!! I think your assumption is sexist! It might have been Lady Gag-me-with-a-Spoon or some other dame!

  130. A bungee chord? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    Does a bungee chord have reverb?

  131. Same Case Here (With Success!) by RuiMarceloFonseca · · Score: 1

    I was able to trace a stolen lapton from a relative with the aid of LogMeIn. As soon as is saw that the computer was being used i started to register all the access IP's. At first i thought of give those addresses to the Police, but then, one day i started a remote session, hoping that the user didn't notice the LogMeIn warning, and.. Success! I recorded every single session in order to later study the videos to find out some useful information. Luckly the user, that was a "she", started accessing the Facebook. In a matter of time i was able to gather lots of information about her name, address, friends, and so on. I gave that information to my relative and he gave it to the police. They went to her house and found the laptop, that was later proven to belong to my relative.

  132. Re:Be Proactive by DanTheStone · · Score: 1

    The only real defense against getting robbed is to not have anything worth stealing.

    That's my motto!

  133. It'd be easier w/ command line access... by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    As it'd be less obvious to someone that you're putting on something to snap pictures:

    1. Get the source for ImageSnap
    2. Compile it for the proper architecture.
    3. Transfer it to the machine
    4. Set up a cron job that calls it at whatever period, and mails it to you

    I use the following script, and run it from cron for some monitoring purposes. (note, this *will* light up the little green 'camera is on' indicator) You then just need to e-mail 'em.

    #!/bin/bash --
     
    DATE=`date +%Y%m%d`
    TIME=`date +%H%M`
     
    mkdir -p /var/log/images/$DATE
    cd /var/log/images/$DATE
     
    /usr/local/bin/imagesnap -q $DATE.$TIME.jpg

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  134. Re:Be Proactive by tzanger · · Score: 1

    Metrosexual is well and truly beyond normal personal hygiene. Try looking up the term.

  135. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then if this got their attention and the police found the laptop, they would hold it for an indefinite amount of time as evidence. You might get lucky and have it returned to you a decade or two later.

  136. Why would the thief use the laptop? by toxonix · · Score: 1

    Why would the thief turn it on? The only solution to laptop theft is a stealthy internal battery operated GPS transmitter. Then you can track the thing down yourself, and steal it back.

  137. Find some gangster types on a streetcorner by boddhisatva · · Score: 2

    Give them the address, tell them you want you want your computer back and they can have everything else in the place. What's the thief going to do? Call the police and tell them someone stole all his stolen stuff?

  138. Show up at his door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The per capita murder rate in the USA is 3 times that of Canada. Aggrivated assault is double. You've handled worse than this guy has dreamed of. If you know where he is, just go to his house and explain to him that returning the laptop quietly is the best possible outcome for everyone.

  139. One way to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ssh to your lost macbook pro and take a picture from the camera using command line tool called imageSnap
    http://iharder.sourceforge.net/current/macosx/imagesnap/

  140. Nuclear options, I like that in a plan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about lying to the police?
    And why not actually plant child porn on the laptop?! :o

  141. Re:Be Proactive by Coren22 · · Score: 1
    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  142. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to mention the part where his laptop gets taken apart and/or kept in evidence for the next two years.

  143. why police? Catch him at his own game by Yakasha · · Score: 1
    • 1. log in and install a "TOU" file somewhere stating that use of the computer grants you ownership of all information provided to the computer and full access to use that information for any purpose it was intended.
    • 2. install keylogger
    • 3. Wait for thief to login to their bank account, brokerage account, facebook account, or anything else on your computer.
    • 4. enjoy.

    You have right now a tool to screw a thief on his own terms. He thinks he has a computer that is free and clear. Make him pay for it.

  144. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    Tell the police that you connected to the machine to try to track him down and found that he had downloaded child porn with it. Then, when they bust him and take the computer, you can file a claim with them. Kind of the nuclear option, but I bet it would work.

    Nah, just log onto the stolen machine remotely and start tweetng the local PD, threatening some prominent person's life. That ought to get some results.

  145. LogMeIn by Xibby · · Score: 1

    Wait until the middle of the night to access the laptop as the theif will be able to see you moving the mouse around via LogMeIn. Go to town adding security software and such to track down your laptop, or just get annoying and do all you can to brick it. Set a password, require password to disable screen saver, require password on wake, turn on FileVault, etc.

    If you get your laptop back or replace it, set a password on the laptop, make sure the laptop asks for the password on wake and for disabling the screen saver, and turn on FileVault to encrypt your home directory, and use CrashPlan or your cloud backup service of choice to backup your data. At least then if your laptop grows legs you're data won't be lost as well, and the theif can't access your files.

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  146. Re:Be Proactive by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he realizes that if you run Linux on a Mac, you wasted 2/3 of the cost on it.

    Also, he is most definitely not Ignorant, he was making a joke, something you seem unable to handle. A hypocrite is someone who professes something opposite of what they do, which he was not doing.

    I do not cower in your shadow, and I am not a feeb, I do however love to poke fun at you because it gets a rise.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  147. Re:OS X 10.7.2? (Remote Lock) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    Your porn collection that valuable?

  148. Too bad you can't sue the police to do their job by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Trace the IP, go there and recover the laptop. If they don't want to arrest the guy at least the guy recovers his property.

    This is why I don't like security services that don't report to you but rather the police. The police can't be bothered. It's a lot better to just have the GPS coordinates yourself. Then you can call the police from outside the guys door. The police will be there within 5 minutes to prevent you from killing the guy.

  149. The IP is not a physical address!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IP is not an address like a street address. The IP moves from one street address to another if the ISP uses DHCP. This would mean that you would have to report date and time that the IP address was read, that the ISP records the issue of the IP addresses and the date, time, and to whom the address was given, and at least in the US a court request to obtain that information for the time in question. Of course if your clock or the clock on the ISP server is wrong, you still might be having the police using a battering ram knocking down the door of local bar having free WIFI.

  150. Re:What if the thief removes the HD and uses a new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some laptops have anti-theft protection at the hardware level (especially dells which it comes standard on). So i'd be careful about thinking you could do that.

  151. Re:Well, there is a way to get the police interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so foolish to lie to them.

  152. Re:Be Proactive by MichaelKristopeitDad · · Score: 1

    Mike, will you come to bed before I have to spank you again? And I thought your mother already asked you too. You're in trouble little fucker.

  153. Re:OS X 10.7.2? (Remote Lock) by torako · · Score: 1

    Do you want a thief to have access to important PDFs on your laptop (credit card statements, purchase receipts, license numbers of your software, whatever), to your e-mails and all that?

  154. Re:Be Proactive by diego.viola · · Score: 1

    Linux + ThinkPad FTW.

  155. Re:Be Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahaha

  156. Re:OS X 10.7.2? (Remote Lock) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    You keep that stuff on your laptop and not in the cloud? :P Seriously, someone with physical access to your laptop, can access your email? Sooo 1990s!

    Seriously, OP made it clear that he was technically bright (enough), that s/he was dealing with a police situation, not a technical one, and that s/he already had IP data. If someone feels silly enough to post low-quality information, they might as well be made fun of.

  157. That's good. by onezeta · · Score: 1

    Its good that you have tracked it to 4th District Vancouver. So what happens now? Did you get your laptop back? What about the thief? Was he or she identified?