Slashdot Mirror


Stolen iPad's Reported Location Not Enough To Warrant Search, Say Dutch Police

lbalbalba writes "A location message sent from a stolen iPad by an anti-theft application turns out to be insufficient evidence to issue a search warrant for the Dutch authorities. A Dutch man reported his iPad as stolen to the Dutch authorities last month. Despite the fact that the rightful owner was able to locate his iPad within hours of the theft, thanks to the anti-theft application he had installed, the Dutch authorities did not issue a warrant to perform a search. According to the prosecutors, a search warrant is 'a very heavy measure,' that should only be used when there is 'sufficient suspicion.' The theft report by the owner was viewed as 'no objective evidence' in the case."

440 of 619 comments (clear)

  1. Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is when you grab the pistol out of the nightstand, take a cab over to the criminals house, break down the door and take justice into your own hands. At least you tried the legal way first.

    1. Re:Plan B. by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand.

    2. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A man notices that burglars are trying to break into his garage. He calls the police who tells him that they don't have any police officers available at the moment.

      A few minutes later he calls the police and says that they don't need to bother because he just shot the burglars. The telephone operator is horrified and several police cars quickly arrive at the man's home and they catch the unharmed burglars red handed.

      "Didn't you say that you shot the burglars?" one police officer asked.

      "Didn't you say that you didn't have any police officers available?" the man retorted...

    3. Re:Plan B. by geekmux · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Over a fucking iPad. Please faggot.

      Real nice...your comments here were almost as offensive as the OP suggesting to use a gun to recover an iPad.

    4. Re:Plan B. by stms · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand.

      And then you wonder why you get your iPads stolen.

    5. Re:Plan B. by trongey · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand.

      Really? I never realized that nightstands were so scarce.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    6. Re:Plan B. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, the cops can find them easily, there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Plan B. by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      Good one. :-)

      Of course the next thing that would happen is the police arrest the homeowner for filing a false report, or abusing 911 resources, or wasting police officers' time on a crime of low priority. Or maybe just "disturbing the peace" which is the standard catch-all to arrest someone who did nothing wrong (like Professor Gates).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    8. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the prosecutors, a search warrant is 'a very heavy measure,' that should only be used when there is 'sufficient suspicion.'

      Of course if there was anonymous tip of some gardening, that would be sufficient for an armed raid...

    9. Re:Plan B. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Statistics for burglaries per 100,000 people, using the most recent figures I could find (2006):
      • USA: 714.4
      • Holland: 427.5

      Looks like those guns are doing a great job of protecting you. It's almost as if a culture that regards force as a valid solution to disputes encourages crime...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Plan B. by phrostie · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling, but if he is a thief to begin with, don't you think he's probably using someone else's internet access?
      the IP address is most likely that of a neighbor.

      still it's no excuse for the cops to do nothing.

    11. Re:Plan B. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand.

      That's great, but when the authorities cannot help citizens with their grievances, eventually this will lead to vigilantism. On the surface, it looks like the police are being quite noble by protecting the rights of the accused. However, this leaves the victim two choices: eat the $500 or bypass the authorities.

      Personally I would put an ad on Craigslist saying that I'll give $500 to the person who does the cops' job for them and fetches my iPad.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Plan B. by Glarimore · · Score: 2

      This is a really old joke. It was very funny to me at first, but in reality by making that false 911 call you're buying yourself a free ticket to be arrested and jailed for the night. And for good reason.

      (The only reason I brought this up is this joke supposedly originates from a Newspaper clipping, and the above statement makes that very unlikely to be true)

    13. Re:Plan B. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      That's still illegal: possession of stolen property. Watch out who you buy from.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course the next thing that would happen is the police arrest the homeowner for filing a false report

      What false report? I 'shot' them with my camera. You know, to help identify them later.

      or abusing 911 resources

      ??

      or wasting police officers' time on a crime of low priority

      I tried to tell your dispatcher that I had taken a picture of the thieves, so they didn't need to worry about coming out at all. I had ::snicker:: no idea that it would make you show up faster.

    15. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      In 1930's Italy, the trains ran on time like much of the civilized world.

    16. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's almost as if a culture with a huge population of poor people encourages crime. It's cute to compare tiny little Holland to the US though.

    17. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Imagine how many thefts and assults there would be if people did not have guns?

      We have cities that imposed weapons bans within city limits, it did not reduce crime at all. In fact some of those cities have HIGHER rates of crimes and higher rates of murder and crimes committed with guns. The thiefs know that there is a very strong chance the potential victim will not have a gun.

    18. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good one. :-)

      Of course the next thing that would happen is the police arrest the homeowner for filing a false report, or abusing 911 resources, or wasting police officers' time on a crime of low priority. Or maybe just "disturbing the peace" which is the standard catch-all to arrest someone who did nothing wrong (like Professor Gates).

      interestingness - disturbing the peace is NOT an arrestable offence (in the UK) once the act is over with unless the disturbance is 1) on going, or 2) likely to reoccur.

      The police officer that tried to arrest me for such didn't like it when I pointed this out to him, but he checked and found that I was correct.

    19. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is the distribution of firearms is un-even.

      Crime statistics are heavily skewed towards urban centers where firearms ownership is heavily controlled or outright prohibited. Arguably, it's more of a societal thing where crimes occur where there's higher un-employment, more broken families, and fewer positive male role models, but saying that un-wed mothers on welfare contribute to crime is not politically correct.

      Kennesaw, Georgia, which mandates firearms ownership, has distinctly lower crime rates than the balance of Cobb County.

    20. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'Tiny little Holland' is one of the densest populated countries in the world, what's your point?

    21. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's almost as if you don't know how statistics work. ("burglaries per 100,000 people").

      If you want to keep chanting "we're #1", then please stop justifying gun ownership on the basis that you have lots of poor people.

    22. Re:Plan B. by Entropius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now look at education statistics in the US vs. Holland. We have so much crime here for reasons that have nothing at all to do with firearms. If we'd adopt something more like Dutch drug laws, or address inner-city education and culture issues, we'd have less crime. There are a whole lot more differences between the Americans and the Dutch that have nothing to do with guns.

      Washington DC is one of the most crime-ridden cities in the US. It's also nearly impossible to legally own a firearm there. Same with Chicago.

    23. Re:Plan B. by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2

      The majority of Americans don't have pistols in their nightstands. The majority of Americans don't own a firearm of any type.

    24. Re:Plan B. by AlecC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since the figures are per 100,000 people, I see no reason not to compare them. Holland has a much greater population density giving greater opportunities for burglary. The two countries have very similar average incomes, though spread differently.I think the comparison is as reasonable as any country-to-country comparison.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    25. Re:Plan B. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd gladly take the false 911 charges over being robbed and possibly killed.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    26. Re:Plan B. by thelexx · · Score: 2

      Right, it's a direct and meaningful comparison because those two countries are equal in every other way. The Netherlands being more homogenous culturally and ethnically, combined with 7th in the world per capita net worth and a tiny population, have absolutely nothing to do with it.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    27. Re:Plan B. by stms · · Score: 1

      I was being sarcastic. I knew I should have posted annonymously.

    28. Re:Plan B. by madison_hotel · · Score: 2

      While I can understand a person's desire for the thief who took his precious iPad to leave this world, the application finds the iPad, not necessarily the person who took it. If I where to take my mother's iPad with me and forget it at some place I visited, I don't think a search warrant would be the way to go. If I took somebody else's iPad and dropped it inside someone's car, I also don't think a search warrant would be the way to go.

    29. Re:Plan B. by ewanm89 · · Score: 2

      1) Dealing in stolen goods both buying and selling is illegal in itself, 2) The police have a possible lead back to who it was bought from, 3) the stolen item can be recovered and returned to the rightful owner.

    30. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's cute to compare tiny little Holland to the US though

      That's funny. I thought 100,000 people in Holland was roughly the same as 100,000 people in the US.

    31. Re:Plan B. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Right. So you have allowed your government to take away your best means of defending yourself and your property, and then put so many restrictions on the police that they can't do anything, either. And then you whine when someone can steal from you with impunity. Quite the civilized world you have there.

           

    32. Re:Plan B. by meerling · · Score: 1

      Of those, how many had guns? (In the nightstand or otherwise available.)

      Just because you can have a gun doesn't mean you do, and most people don't.

    33. Re:Plan B. by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Statistics for burglaries per 100,000 people, using the most recent figures I could find (2006):

      • USA: 714.4
      • Holland: 427.5

      Looks like those guns are doing a great job of protecting you. It's almost as if a culture that regards force as a valid solution to disputes encourages crime...

      On the other hand, in the UK whith some of the strictest gun laws in the world, there were 1,157.7 burglaries per 100,000 people (also, conveniently, in 2006 statistics). It's almost as if two data points are insufficient to establish a causative or even correlative relation of any kind.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    34. Re:Plan B. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      I think the app in question reports physical location based on internal GPS, rather than just an IP address.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    35. Re:Plan B. by meerling · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Old joke, but too closely based in reality.
      Twice we had people firing guns at our house when it was evening and we were on the porch. Saw the muzzleflash both times. Cops wouldn't even call us back, much less drive by and see if there were any bodies.

      My brother was doing security at night and called in some intruders that had broken in. The cops said they wouldn't send anybody else, so he said, "guess that means I'll have to shoot them." and hung up. Cops were there in less than 5 minutes.

      It seems if it's not giving a traffic ticket, the local cops don't give a sh##.

    36. Re:Plan B. by Purpleslog · · Score: 2

      This ref ( http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/details/society/burglaries.aspx) for 2006 has it at 640 for the Netherlands and 721 for the USA (in per 100000 people). This ref ( http://www.nationmaster.com/red/country/nl-netherlands/cri-crime&all=1 and http://www.nationmaster.com/red/country/us-united-states/cri-crime&all=1 ) has total crime victims at 25% in the Netherlands and at 21% in the US.

    37. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the 100,000 people in the USA weigh 67.34% more.

    38. Re:Plan B. by arisvega · · Score: 1

      cute to compare tiny little Holland to the US

      Oh yes, it is a tiny country. Dutch companies, on the other hand, are not that tiny. Recognise any names?

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    39. Re:Plan B. by VMaN · · Score: 1

      http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_obe-health-obesity

      Not really

      *ignoring the Holland/Netherland distinction.

    40. Re:Plan B. by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      Yes. And in the event that you are charged you will also get to publicize exactly what happened in the media and court system. The more often the police are exposed for what they are (power hungry thugs) the more likely it will change.

    41. Re:Plan B. by VMaN · · Score: 1

      Yes, and even distribution of zero guns would alleviate the gun violence.

    42. Re:Plan B. by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Yes, clearly the only possible influence on reported crime statistics is the number of guns per capita, and it should be based on a single data point. Or, just maybe you could use a back-to-back comparison for states or countries that change their laws re: gun regulation. John R Lott, Jr. did a lot of research and wrote the book "More Guns, Less Crimes". Here is an interview where he talks about countries with lots of crime, few gun and other with low crime but lots of guns.

      His research was mostly re: US County crime and gun rate over time -- And his conclusion is obvious based on the title.

      Now, people and studies both agree and disagree with his research & conclusions. Both his and other studies are likely to be flawed due to biases of authors (political or otherwise).

      I think calling the parent post of my rant to be informative is simply ridiculous. Real information in this realm is hard, if not impossible to attain.

    43. Re:Plan B. by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Better yet, of those that have guns, how many of them were used to commit crimes. I'm going to guess that those that legally own a hand gun and commit a crime with it is much much lower then those that have them to stay safe or like collecting guns.

      Also on a general note, America's "right to bear arms" was originally written into the Constitution to help prevent the government from completely taking over. I believe this is one reason why some people in government want to make owning guns illegal. It's the first step to taking over your own people. Prevent them from fighting, or in this case shooting back.

    44. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not? Possession of stolen property is a crime. Get them to roll over on who was there that left it so the cops can get the thief.

    45. Re:Plan B. by VMaN · · Score: 3

      "homogenous culturally"..

      What do you base that on? Western Europe can hardly be called culturally homogenous..

    46. Re:Plan B. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You set their house on fire, with them in it.

      I despise laptop / electronics thieves.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    47. Re:Plan B. by Poltron+Inconnu · · Score: 1

      Actually they would've shown up like that from the first call. When you call and there is any indication that someone is trying to break into your home with you present, they will respond swiftly indeed. It's something else entirely if you call to report that a burglary took place while you were gone and the thieves departed before you returned. If the scenario of the joke were real, things would quickly turn sour for whoever failed to dispatch the officers and they would find themselves under investigation for failure to perform their duties with a reckless disregard for the safety of the caller.

    48. Re:Plan B. by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      The cultures are different, and the US crimes rate varies greatly by the racial and ethnic makeup of each region.

      The best-armed areas are frequently the most peaceful. They also share a certain demographic similarity....

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    49. Re:Plan B. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      2 - TomTom and Shell, and shell is just a subsidiary of a british company. Did you really want to compare large companies to the US?

    50. Re:Plan B. by ctsupafly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Criminals will still be criminals & acquire guns. All disarming your population does is disarm the law abiding citizens, this has no effect on crime rates.

    51. Re:Plan B. by jlar · · Score: 5, Informative

      But burglary is only one crime parameter. If you look at a broader range of crime statistics the picture is less clear cut. Rape is for example twice as prevalent in Holland as in the US. Overall victimization is also higher in Holland. But other crime statistics show less crime in Holland.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/compare/Netherlands/United-States/Crime

    52. Re:Plan B. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why this is so sad. A geek site? People supposed to be generally good at math? Yet you see just as many bullshit statistics thrown around here as on Fox News comment sections.

    53. Re:Plan B. by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's more to it than just population density. Compared to the US, Holland has a much better social net to prevent the proliferation of crime that poverty brings.

      When you're hungry, it's easier to break laws to eat. A liberalized drug policy also doesn't force people to become criminals and basically lock them out of the career workforce by making recreational users felons and career criminals. I'll admit I don't know, but I'm pretty sure there isn't that disaffected youth "gang culture" that glorifies basically rejecting honest work, education, and trying to better oneself that seems to be pervasive with the poor within the US's densely populated cities.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    54. Re:Plan B. by nbritton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a really old joke. It was very funny to me at first, but in reality by making that false 911 call you're buying yourself a free ticket to be arrested and jailed for the night. And for good reason.

      Why is that a good reason? If cops would actually do what they're "supposed" to do and catch a robber, that wouldn't have been necessary. Instead they were probably more concerned with sitting on the side of the road raising revenue or harassing some pot smokers.

      I think your absolutely right, if a class 1 felony is not important enough to get the cops off their ass they should be fired. No prosecutor would prosecute you for doing something like this, for starters they would look like a fool at trial and it would bring to light the neglagince of the police. Committing a crime to stop a more grievous crime is also a complete defense, provided it's not excessive (n-1 is generally acceptable). If they were stupid enough to charge you with a crime you would have them by the balls and hypothetically if it got all the way to a trial you could just testify that you shot them with your camera.

    55. Re:Plan B. by Hentes · · Score: 2

      You are mixing up cause and effect. Americans have guns exactly because of the high crime rate. It's a barbaric solution, but sometimes it's needed.

    56. Re:Plan B. by Beelzebud · · Score: 2

      Your post is a fine example of why you get called a "gun nut", in case you were ever wondering.

    57. Re:Plan B. by Applekid · · Score: 1

      In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king.

      The technological cat is out of the bag: one can make explosives and devices that contain the explosive force to propel objects with deadly kinetic energy. If all manufacturers were put out of business and all guns and ammo were winked out of existence, rest assured that someone, probably without any benevolent motives, will make one and use it to control others.

      Since the days humans could make tools, we've been using them against each other. You can't deny that nature, and all the laws and prohibitions in the world won't change it.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    58. Re:Plan B. by gknoy · · Score: 2

      That's okay, I hear it's pretty common here (US) to arrest you for ... resisting arrest.

    59. Re:Plan B. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem is in the US there is a cultural mindset of "I'm getting mine!" Other cultures are far less expecting of material (and non-material) rewards. Some cultures completely reject everything in this life with their goals firmly fixed on an afterlife.

      What this gets you is in the US theft is common. 1 in 10 people going into a store are going to steal stuff. If it isn't locked down, it will disappear. The idea of people in rural areas being able to leave their doors unlocked and inviting their neighbors in disappeared when the gangs moved into rural areas. The idea of people fleeing the urban inner city to reach some kind of paradise in the suburbs disappeared in the 1970s - today the suburbs are as gang and crime ridden as the inner cities.

      Sure, overall as a percentage of the population violent crime is down in the US from where it was in the 1980s and early 1990s. But that doesn't mean the overall effect on people is much different. If you walk down the street in the "wrong" part of town you will likely be robbed or beaten up just for being there and not belonging. If you stick to places where "your kind" are, you will probably be alright - most cities are very territorial with different ethnic groups staking out their turf and being very protective of it. A Hispanic man walking through a White neighborhood might just get the police down on him but a White man in a Hispanic neighborhood clearly doesn't belong there and riles up a lot of feelings. The assumption seems to be that by moving out of their own territory the invader wants to take over their neighborhood as well. As this has been the history of the US, the feelings like this aren't exactly wrong.

      Unfortunately the penetration of guns in the general population is low enough that it is a virtual certainity that nobody you rob is going to have a gun. When a robber confronts someone with a gun it is a big news story, usually because the robber sues the victim and wins. It is clear that outlawing guns only means the outlaws will have them and the rest will not. Since we can't keep guns out of the hands of the criminals, crazy people or anyone who wants one and doesn't care about laws against it there are many that believe the US should be a far more armed society than it is. At least then people will have some defense and support. The police openly admit that they have no interest in confronting robbers and such - they will be happy to come along later and take your report - if you are in any condition to give it.

    60. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, when you Europeans hear about how rampant gun ownership is per capita in the US, you should be aware that residents of Texas, Montana, and Northern Michigan own an average of 138 firearms each, while the rest of the residents of the US don't own any. That's why the per capita gun ownership statistic is so high.

    61. Re:Plan B. by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Crime rates here in Holland also vary by the racial and ethnic makeup of each region. And I thought there were places in the big US cities where the police doesn't really like to come anymore because the inhabitants of those places are so well armed?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    62. Re:Plan B. by trum4n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. I do not own a gun, but the simple matter is: Bad guys have illegal guns, no matter how illegal they are. Good guys only have guns if they are legal. Taking away our right to protection does not take away the bad guys' illegal guns.

    63. Re:Plan B. by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Why did this get modded up? The numbers in the GP were per 100,000 people, so it's a perfectly fair comparison.

    64. Re:Plan B. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      the application finds the iPad, not necessarily the person who took it

      While I agree that that is an excellent point for why vigilante justice would not be a good idea, that's not really a reason to not issue a search warrant, simply a reason to not arrest whoever happens to be possessing the iPad at the time. Although... maybe if a search warrant was not issued until after the police went to the residence, explained the situation (we have certifiable, verifiable proof that there is stolen property within your residence), and were then denied entry...

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    65. Re:Plan B. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Very true, you get your friends and wait for the guy to come out, then beat him up, take his wallet and recover your ipad.

      Wear gloves and masks so you cant be identified.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    66. Re:Plan B. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Most of those thefts are stolen guns.

      That's the problem the thieves are stealing our guns!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    67. Re:Plan B. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands being more homogenous culturally and ethnically, combined with 7th in the world per capita net worth and a tiny population, have absolutely nothing to do with it.

      If I'm reading you correctly, the usual perception that's being expressed here is that the higher crime rate must be black and Hispanic people. This is not an uncommon belief in the US, but statistics don't back up that perception: For instance, check out Connecticut crime statistics from 2000-2004: There were over 3 times as many whites as blacks arrested for burglary, larceny, aggravated assault, and arson, and about twice as many white rapists as black rapists. The difference in incarceration rates is mainly because black criminals were far more likely to be convicted and sentenced to prison time than white criminals who had committed the same offense.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    68. Re:Plan B. by aynoknman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rape is for example twice as prevalent in Holland as in the US.

      Are these statistics controlled for different definitions of rape, different reporting levels, etc.? I suspect not.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    69. Re:Plan B. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      While the people in Holland have 75% less Glaucoma but 80% more cravings of munchies.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    70. Re:Plan B. by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's almost as if a culture with a huge population of poor people encourages crime. It's cute to compare tiny little Holland to the US though.

      Don't forget retarded people, because it's the only country I know that doesn't understand concepts like "per person", "per square kilometer" or other forms of normalization.

      "Guns in nightstands protect against crime" "Here's some crime figures per 100,000 inhabitants" "Cute, but you can't compare a big and small country" "???"

      "We can't build fast Internet in the US, the population is too thin." "Uh but this country does with a lower population density than yours (people/km^2)" "Cute, but you can't compare a big and small country" "???"

      "We're not so bad polluters, China emits more CO2 than us" "Yes but China is 1.33 billion people and you're 300 million, per person you emit more than triple what a Chinese person does." "Hurr durr, I ignore what you said and China is worse". "???"

      Arguing here I get enough stupid from both posters and moderators to make me want to tear my hair out and then I remember this is supposed to be the intelligentsia of the US, the nerds. I guess that's true when I see the support a guy like Santorum has, but you're over a hurdle about two inches high. Could someone please teach Slashdot some remedial math classes so my intelligence stops being insulted? Believe it or not, it is possible to compare the US to other countries even if they have different sizes and populations. Everywhere else this is accepted but here I sometimes feel like I just preached evolution in a southern baptist church group.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    71. Re:Plan B. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just to chime in on this point, from what I've heard (I've never looked it up myself) the city in Texas I lived while I was in high school (late '90s, early 2000s) and where my parents are still living has the highest concealed carry per capita in the entire state, and also has the lowest violent crimes rate per capita in the entire state.

      Again, this is just anecdotal, and one point of data does not a trend indicate, but I always found it interesting. I also found it interesting that I was never aware of anyone carrying (aside from officers and others who openly carry). Either I was very naive, very unobservant, or the people who are licensed to carry do a good job of concealing it like they're supposed to. I'm leaning towards a mix of all three.

    72. Re:Plan B. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Look, that is what insurance is for. If you can afford an iPad, then you can afford the insurance.

      In reality the thief is doing someone a favor. Their iPad was older and had some wear, so they get a new one. Apple is happy because they sold another iPad. The guy that got it is happy because he didn't have one before. Everyone wins.

    73. Re:Plan B. by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      No shit. A pistol is a MUCH more worthwhile thing to steal than some stupid iPad.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    74. Re:Plan B. by LDAPMAN · · Score: 3, Informative

      You picked Connecticut to make your point? Do you realize that Connecticut has one of the lowest percentages of non-white population? Yes, it is highly likely that most crimes in a state that is overwhelmingly white will be committed by white people.

    75. Re:Plan B. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Washington D.C.'s crime rates have been falling for years. As of a few years ago at least, they were the lowest they had been in over 20 years, and the initiatives encouraging that have been continuing since then, so I'd think that the numbers have kept falling. Even so, it is a major city, so crime will always be present, but its numbers are much more in line with other major U.S. cities now.

    76. Re:Plan B. by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Faggot is a generic derogatory term. Recently used mostly against gays. Not so much anymore. Not necessarily an anti gay term. On the other hand. When the police do nothing and you can see who is stealing your stuff getting it back even if by force is not inherently evil. In fact if there is no legal justice I would proffer that allowing a person to get away with theft just because the police will do nothing is the real breakdown of a good society. You point the gun directly at their face and point your other hand at you iPad. You let them know that you are recovering your property and that they can either recognize your right to your property or not. But you will be retrieving it. You do not have to shoot them if they are smart. If they are too stupid to see their untenable position then I would say that "Nothing of value was lost".

      Rule #1: Never underestimate your opponent.

      If they're "smart", you're only going to be charged with assault with a deadly weapon.

      If they're "too stupid", you're only going to be charged with murder. You certainly may try to view it as nothing of value was lost, if for some strange reason you do not find any value in your own freedom.

      And if you've underestimated your opponent, now YOU are the one who is looking down the barrel of a gun pointed in your face.

      And yes, the legal system is screwed. But honestly, from a purely monetary standpoint, I'm not certain that ANY of the above scenarios is cheaper to deal with than a $500 iPad. Not saying it's right...just saying.

    77. Re:Plan B. by doggo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Horseshit! Most people who own (hand)guns own them for "home protection", presumably burglary & home invasion.The problem with that is that most people never experience a home invasion, unless they're involved in the distribution or manufacture of illegal drugs. And burglars typically don't come armed, since if they're caught doing a burglary while armed the penalties are much harsher.

      So these people who own guns for "home protection" are not typically carrying them when they are assaulted or robbed on the street.

      On top of all that is the actual usefulness of guns in the first place. Unless you're well trained and practicing regularly, handguns are pretty useless for actually shooting a person who doesn't want to be shot. Ever go to a gun range? If you do, look at how ridiculously close most handgun shooters have their targets. At that range, you're better off running up to your foe and punching them. Shotguns and rifles are far better firearms for shooting under pressure of threat. But most citizens can't walk around their city armed with a rifle or shotgun.

      Most of the arguments for handgun ownership are specious at best. And the most ardent gun advocates live in areas with very little threat from "the bad guys".

      And for what it's worth, yes, I am a handgun owner.

    78. Re:Plan B. by toadlife · · Score: 1

      +1 informative

      Thanks for the link. I'd never heard of that Barry Cooper guy. He's a true American hero.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    79. Re:Plan B. by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Oklahoma! I'm proud to be helping to keep up our average...but I only have about 15 and only two are handguns.

    80. Re:Plan B. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Americans have guns exactly because of the high crime rate. It's a barbaric solution, but sometimes it's needed.

      What a load of crap. A lot of Americans simply enjoy guns (collecting, competitive target-shooting, etc.) Some folks like hunting. Some are genuinely afraid because all their neighbors have guns, too. And some are dangerous nutcases.

    81. Re:Plan B. by Entropius · · Score: 2

      I got my car window smashed in three days after I moved there, and I'm in a "reasonably decent" part of town. There are police cars on my street nearly every night.

      In 2010, of cities >250k, it is seventh in the nation in murders and third in robberies.

    82. Re:Plan B. by psmears · · Score: 1

      Have you really never heard of Philips?

    83. Re:Plan B. by doggo · · Score: 2

      Twenty percent of U.S. homicides occur in four cities with just 6% of the populationâ"New York, Chicago, Detroit, and Washington, D.C.â"and each has or, in the cases of Detroit (until 2001) and D.C. (2008) had, a requirement for a license on private handguns or an effective outright ban (in the case of Chicago) - Wikipedia

    84. Re:Plan B. by quantaman · · Score: 2

      The problem with a city or even statewide ban is it's a relatively small region embedded in a gun heavy region, so there's a lot of guns floating around and even a lot of otherwise law abiding citizens are probably flouting the law.

      To conduct a proper test you'd probably have to do something on the national level like the assault weapons ban, though from my short reading it sounds like the evidence is slightly ambiguous in that instance.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    85. Re:Plan B. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Yet you see just as many bullshit statistics thrown around here as on Fox News comment sections.

      Why cite Fox News comment sections in paricular? Have you ever bothered to look at the comments at MSNBC, the NYT, the Huffington Post "news" items, the BBC, Al Jazeera, ABC News, CNN, or any other outlet? By choosing one and implying that the rate there is the highest, you're guilty of exactly what you're describing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    86. Re:Plan B. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      Public intoxication (PI) is another favorite "catch all" charge. It is used frequently here in Austin to temporarily take people off the street for whatever reason, you don't have to be intoxicated. In the end you either pay a fine or contest it in court, where it comes down to your word against the police. If the cop does not show up to testify, the charge is thrown out (but you have already spent time in jail). If the cop shows up, and the jurors agree with the cop you are charged the fine and court fees.

      I have yet to be caught by this, but have been a juror for a PI trial. The defendant claimed he was not drunk, and the only thing the police said was he was acting "erratically". No breathalyzer. No sobriety test. No mention of bloodshot eyes, alcohol smell, impaired speech or specific illegal acts. We found him innocent. The local paper often has stories about downtown revelers whose behavior is not to the police's liking, but not illegal, so they are picked up for PI.

    87. Re:Plan B. by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      Not just because they are armed, but also because many of the locals regard law enforcement as the enemy to their criminal activities and the rest refuse to standup as witnesses to criminal behavior.

    88. Re:Plan B. by Andraax · · Score: 1

      Guess you never heard of insurance deductibles.

    89. Re:Plan B. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Or at the very least say "my iPad phoned home, and says it's here, I'd like it back".

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    90. Re:Plan B. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      If you want to keep chanting "we're #1", ...

      Don't get me wrong; I'm an American and think this country - as a whole - is generally pretty great, but, sadly, I don't recall seeing many lists recently that objectively rank the USA as #1 - at least for anything positive...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    91. Re:Plan B. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Vigilante justice is NEVER a good idea, which is why I feel strongly that authorities should be able to arbitrate disputes. If there is no route through the authorities, then people will turn to vigilantism - and then issue like you mention come up.

      If I took somebody else's iPad and dropped it inside someone's car, I also don't think a search warrant would be the way to go.

      Of course not - but that isn't what happened here. It's hard to tell from the article because I am reading the translation, but it seems that the accuser actually knows the accused - the cops know who both parties are, they know what the accusation is, and they know where the iPad in question is. It makes me wonder if something else isn't going on, like whether there is a disputed sale or transfer of ownership or something. Otherwise it seems like a pretty clear cut case, and people are rarely this stupid. (Yes, I just said that...)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    92. Re:Plan B. by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      No, it's almost as if a culture with a huge population of poor people encourages crime.

      The stats quoted are per 100,000, not absolute. If you'd said a culture with a huge proportion of poor people you might have a point, but even then, you're claiming the sole cause is that the US has huge inequalities without presenting any evidence for that. The higher burglary rate could be cultural (gun culture), social (incarceration for minor offences, broken safety net), economic (poverty), or most likely a mix of all three, but it's certainly an alarming statistic which should make anyone from the US think again about crime and how to tackle it.

      The current approach clearly isn't working for the US given the statistics.

    93. Re:Plan B. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many Americans seem to think that all Dutch people are white Dutch people, all French people are white French people etc. and that somehow the U.S. invented immigration and multi racial society (just like they invented everything else). There seems little point in trying to disabuse them of their ignorance.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    94. Re:Plan B. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      If you look at a broader range of crime statistics the picture is less clear cut. Rape is for example twice as prevalent in Holland as in the US.

      Well, sure. Doesn't Julian Assange have a house in Holland too?
      [ I'm KIDDING, of course - geesh - everyone knows it's an apartment. ] :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    95. Re:Plan B. by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Please come to the UK, gun crime is very low, so is crime ...

      Anyone with a gun is either : Police, in full SWAT gear, Army in full Uniform, or a criminal ...

      The criminal will get reported, and very soon after most likely shot ... so the criminals (non-stupid ones) don't carry guns ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    96. Re:Plan B. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Where do you live that random people you don't know are firing guns at your house on a regular basis?

    97. Re:Plan B. by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      And the more often the police is called power hungry thugs, the more likely they are to become that.

      --
      What?
    98. Re:Plan B. by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      You apologists are really pathetic sometimes. You'll come up with any fucking excuse you can to believe that USA #1! and every other country is just some special exception and that they aren't *really* better based on some objective metric. The logical backflips you people do, particularly gun nuts, are just mind-bogglingly stupid.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    99. Re:Plan B. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      "homogenous culturally"..

      What do you base that on? Western Europe can hardly be called culturally homogenous..

      Sure, but "The Netherlands," which is what your parent post mentioned and is *one* country, could be called that.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    100. Re:Plan B. by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Just because nobody calls the cops does not mean they are peaceful.

      --
      What?
    101. Re:Plan B. by trongey · · Score: 1

      In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand.

      Really? I never realized that nightstands were so scarce.

      Nah, just uncivilized.

      So you're saying that only savages have nightstands.
      That seems reasonable.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    102. Re:Plan B. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You must not have insurance, because you don't seem to understand how it works.

    103. Re:Plan B. by Kharny · · Score: 1

      funnily enough, unilver is not on that list, and they are huge nowadays.

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    104. Re:Plan B. by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      - And disarming those who act in affect

      --
      What?
    105. Re:Plan B. by hldn · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure there isn't that disaffected youth "gang culture" that glorifies basically rejecting honest work, education, and trying to better oneself that seems to be pervasive with the poor within the US's densely populated cities.

      this is a much bigger contributor to increased crime than poverty itself.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    106. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Crime rates here in Holland also vary by the racial and ethnic makeup of each region. And I thought there were places in the big US cities where the police doesn't really like to come anymore because the inhabitants of those places are so well armed?

      East side, people who wear wooden shoes.
      West side, those hooligans that don't.

    107. Re:Plan B. by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      What's the statistic for burglaries per square mile?

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    108. Re:Plan B. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      This is mostly a problem when you have a situation like the one in the US with local laws against gun ownership but guns being freely available ten minutes away.

      That said, I'm not really in favor of banning guns but if you're caught carrying an illegal firearm (unlicensed, concealed carry without a permit, etc) the legal system should look very harshly on this. This seems to be a contributing reason for why criminals in countries with few guns don't have guns (or at least don't carry them on their person unless they plan on using them), if getting busted with an illegal handgun means you go to jail you'll probably avoid carrying one without reason (and since other criminals are likely to reason the same way you're not risking all that much).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    109. Re:Plan B. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You say Gates did nothing wrong? I beg to differ. That PBS documentary he did a few years ago where he went to Africa was a criminal offense. He still hasn't brought to justice for that patronizing bunch of crap.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    110. Re:Plan B. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Look, that is what insurance is for. If you can afford an iPad, then you can afford the insurance. In reality the thief is doing someone a favor. Their iPad was older and had some wear, so they get a new one. Apple is happy because they sold another iPad. The guy that got it is happy because he didn't have one before. Everyone wins.

      Especially the insurance company. Everyone's rates go up to cover sloth. Yay. Great idea. :-P

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    111. Re:Plan B. by elbonia · · Score: 1

      What exactly makes you think that the Dutch are a multinational society? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Netherlands It seems only 15-17% are nonwhite while in the US 12.4% of the population are black/afrtican http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States#Black_Americans. Then you have to factor in hispanics and asians and other races. Do you have any facts to backup your claim?

    112. Re:Plan B. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      On top of all that is the actual usefulness of guns in the first place. Unless you're well trained and practicing regularly, handguns are pretty useless for actually shooting a person who doesn't want to be shot. Ever go to a gun range? If you do, look at how ridiculously close most handgun shooters have their targets. At that range, you're better off running up to your foe and punching them.

      That's bullshit. Most people actually place targets too far on the handgun range, because, statistically, the person trying to assault you is almost guaranteed to be within 5 meters from you when you notice them and start to react. And even a person that has minimal gun practice will have no problem unloading a full magazine into a human-size figure at that distance (from personal experience - I could easily group shots within a 5-inch circle or so at 15 feet when I first tried to shoot a handgun - and that was a compact Glock, not some kind of match gun).

      Most certainly, you're not better of running up to your foe and punching them. For one, it's still slower than aiming and squeezing the trigger. For another, it does not do anything to stop a determined assailant, unless you're physically much stronger than they are.

      The reason why handguns are superior self-defense tools (compared to e.g. martial arts training) is precisely because an average person can learn to use one very efficiently in self-defense situations that actually have any likelihood of occurring in real life with minimal time and effort invested into learning the ropes and maintaining the skill.

    113. Re:Plan B. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      /. Where fantasies about shooting people who steal your ipad get modded "insightful".

    114. Re:Plan B. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, the usual perception (which is supported by facts) is that higher crime rates generally tend to be associated with minority groups that, for whatever reason, are poorly integrated and/or discriminated in society. Wherever such a group exists, it's virtually guaranteed to have higher crime rates per capita. Often such groups are formed by immigration, but sometimes they are historical (e.g. Roma).

    115. Re:Plan B. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      OJ Simpson tried it. He's in prison for life. Doesn't matter whether you are trying to recover your own property.

      Now if there were DRUGS in the house, they'd send in armored Starship Troopers and shoot the family dog as a friendly way of saying hello. Well, in the English-speaking countries, anyway.

    116. Re:Plan B. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You set their house on fire, with them in it.

      Worse nonsense. You want to set the kindergarten next door on fire?

      Just park yourself in front of their house and follow them, then swipe it back at your first opportunity. Tell him to call the cops if he doesn't like it.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    117. Re:Plan B. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, in the UK whith some of the strictest gun laws in the world, there were 1,157.7 burglaries per 100,000 people (also, conveniently, in 2006 statistics). It's almost as if two data points are insufficient to establish a causative or even correlative relation of any kind.

      Even if you had many points, it would still be hard to say anything conclusive, because different countries differ in many more things than just gun laws on the books.

      (the same applies to U.S. states, by the way, for those Americans who want to use state crime rates to support a pro-gun viewpoint)

    118. Re:Plan B. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Well, if we burglarize your house, we know where to find your gun. Thanks!

    119. Re:Plan B. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Connecticut has the 21st highest percentage of blacks, so it's not one of the lowest, it's on the high side of the middle.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    120. Re:Plan B. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Oh, settle down. I agree with you. I was just tossing out the local whipping boy for the sake of brevity.

    121. Re:Plan B. by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      As you say, it's spread differently. In Holland the median and mean incomes are probably much closer. In the USA we have a number of hugely wealthy people that drag the mean up. We DO have a 'huge population of poor people'. Also, we have substantial stratification - we have areas where a burglary is front page news, but we also have areas where a murder would be lucky to hit page 7.

      Personally, as always when I consider this stuff, I blame the 'war on drugs'. It creates desperate people.

      Also, be careful of cherry picking data - England's is worse than the USA, so obviously presence/absence of guns isn't the only factor.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    122. Re:Plan B. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      What claim am I supposed to have made? Maybe you're replying to the wrong post.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    123. Re:Plan B. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      He's trying to say you don't have black people.

      Let me put this in: America is screwed up because our economy was based on slavery. We treated the slaves and ex-slaves like animals, and made a huge section of our population into a permanent underclass, locked into ghettos without real jobs, schools or housing. No matter how much we've changed, when Americans talk about how they need guns, they mean they are afraid of the part of town with the descendants of ex-slaves in it.

      And we're afraid of the white poor as well... but a major part of that poverty was caused by wage competition with people of color who were paid nothing, and then almost nothing for over three hundred years. As they are now competing with overseas workers being paid ten cents an hour. We've systemic poverty that leads to violent stupidity and overpopulation in some parts of the country, and the well-off are terrified of those people, hence the constant references to homogeneous cultures being better off.

      Of course Europe is not homogeneous - but it didn't have millions of blacks in slavery and near-slavery for over 300 years.

      The fear of the poor is absolute and fueled by endless loops of violence shown by local news every night. Americans are convinced they are living in a crime-ridden hell, and the problem is those non-homogeneous folks.

    124. Re:Plan B. by buck-yar · · Score: 4, Informative

      UK's homocide rate in 2010 was 1.23 / 100,000
      Vermont's was 1.12.

      Vermont has the fewest gun laws of any of the 50 states. You do not need a permit to carry concealed. UK has some of the world's strictest gun laws.

    125. Re:Plan B. by 4pins · · Score: 1

      A friend told me a similar story, it went like this...

      My family lives in a small town that only owns seven police cars. One evening my dad noticed a strange car in our neighbors driveway and lights moving around inside. So he called the police...

      P: 911 what is your emergency.
      D: My neighbor's house is being robbed.
      P: All units are currently responding to other calls.
      D: Understood, I will take care of it.
      P: What do you mean?
      D: I have a shotgun, I will go take care of it.
      P: Sir, do not do that, we will be right there. What is the address?

      Police cars start showing up, fifteen minutes later they number seven.

      --
      I will not mourn that which I never had to lose. - Unknown
    126. Re:Plan B. by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have 3 full length ar15s, 4 pistol ar15s, a benelli M4, 2 ak's..... I could go on. I've never killed anyone.

      I did have an attempted robbery though. An intruder thought I wasn't home because I didn't answer the door (sketchy looking guy through the peephole... not going to answer it). So he tried to ram his shoulder through. Luckily the door jam held until a neighbor came out to yell at the guy. If he broke through, I had my HK-USP 40sw sighted in right at the door. He would have ate a bullet salad. Never was I so thankful to have a particular inanimate object.

    127. Re:Plan B. by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      That is right, because my rifles would not fit in my nightstand.

    128. Re:Plan B. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Blacks are about 9% of Connecticut's population. That's below the national average but higher than most states. If 3 times as many whites as blacks are arrested for crimes, blacks have a (91/9)/3 = 3.4 times higher crime arrest rate

      The difference in incarceration rates is mainly because black criminals were far more likely to be convicted and sentenced to prison time than white criminals who had committed the same offense

      Don't you see the bias in that claim? Processing through the government justice system is what filters arrest rates into conviction and sentencing rates. You are saying that conviction in Connecticut is significantly different from having actually committed the crime. You are claiming that the notoriously liberal state of Connecticut unjustly imprisons a disproportionate number of blacks. Thus one and probably both of the following claims is true: liberals are disproportionally bad, blacks are disproportionally bad, based on the numbers you cite and other publicly available information.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    129. Re:Plan B. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, that is unpossible.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    130. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you knew this, but our forefathers thought slavery was a grand idea. This created one institutionally poor class of people who make up a fairly sizeable chunk of our population. Second, we have a porous border with a third world country.

      Higher percentage of poor people in dense areas per 100k people means a higher number of crimes per 100k people. We also have an odd entitlement culture which leads people to think they "deserve" more.

    131. Re:Plan B. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Vigilante justice is NEVER a good idea,...

      Prove it. Not just the easy cases where things go bad, not just the average trend. You wrote NEVER, so prove never, that there is no situation where "vigilante justice" is preferable to all other possibilities.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    132. Re:Plan B. by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Real nice...your comments here were almost as offensive as the OP suggesting to use a gun to recover an iPad.

      What's the alternative?

      Citizen: Help, Police! That man stole my (VALUABLE_ITEM)
      Police: What seems to be the trouble?
      Citizen: He stole my (VALUABLE_ITEM)
      Police: Oh? And you know this?
      Citizen: Yes, I know for a fact he stole my (VALUABLE_ITEM)
      Police: Sorry, we can't help you
      Citizen: What? Why?
      Police: There isn't sufficient evidence he stole your (VALUABLE_ITEM)
      Citizen: Ok.... well, what can I do? He stole my (VALUABLE_ITEM)!!
      Police: Nothing can be done, just go home, your (VALUABLE_ITEM) is gone and even though you know who stole it there is nothing that can be done to recover it.


      He tried to do things the proper way, but when the police won't help you what can you do? Break in yourself? Steal it back? Can you get arrested for stealing something you own?

      This story makes no sense, there must be more to it that's been lost in translation.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    133. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like "infant mortality" is measured much more stringently in the US than the rest of the world but people like to lie and pretend the US has worse infant mortality. Good for the goose...

    134. Re:Plan B. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, didn't recognize it by it's dutch name.

    135. Re:Plan B. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Just to give figures: about 42% of households and 30% of adults in the US have one or more firearms. (Gallup, 2005)

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    136. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. The US has a much larger percentage of institutionally poor people. That's why the crime is higher, not because of gun rights.

    137. Re:Plan B. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They may *think* they have a gun for protection, but actually, it's to endanger other people. "According to the CDC, the rate of firearm deaths among children under age 15 is almost 12 times higher in the United States than in 25 other industrialized countries combined. American children are 16 times more likely to be murdered with a gun, 11 times more likely to commit suicide with a gun, and nine times more likely to die in a firearm accident than children in these other countries".

      Think of the children!

    138. Re:Plan B. by tibit · · Score: 1

      I have a bit of a problem with just killing anyone who tried to break into your house. I mean, come on, burglary is not a capital crime in most places. Why do you think it's OK in your home, but not in court?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    139. Re:Plan B. by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand all the troll mods? Is there anything untrue about my statement?

    140. Re:Plan B. by Roogna · · Score: 1

      Does that include the crimes committed on Capital Hill? As I'm pretty sure the crime rate in Washington D.C. is still soaring.

    141. Re:Plan B. by tibit · · Score: 1

      1 in 10 people going into a store are going to steal stuff. If it isn't locked down, it will disappear.

      And I thought it was Poles who where the thiefs... Alas, got anything to back this statistic? I think it's pulled from some stinky place :(

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    142. Re:Plan B. by kj_kabaje · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Netherlands#Genetics

      Looks like 80% "white" or ethnic Dutch.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_France

      It's currently illegal to count people by ethnicity in France, so hard to say for sure. However:

      "Solis, a marketing company, recently estimated the numbers for ethnic minorities (immigrants and 2nd generation) in France in 2009 as 3.26 million Maghrebis (5.23%), 1.83 million Black people (2.94%, 1.08 million Sub-Saharan Africans and 757,000 French from French West Indies) and 441,000 Turkish (0.71%) ."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

      Looks like 72% "white", but of this, the US counts persons of Hispanic origin differently. Consider also that that 72% is not monolithic (e.g., there are persons that are Dutch, German, English, Nordic, etc.) rather than solely one ethnic origin. The US doesn't even try to count people of different "white" origins in census data.

      Yes--immigration has become more of an issue in the last 50 or so years for Europe. Your point may stand, but it is on very shaky ground since pretty much 80+ percent of Holland or France appears to be of one origin. Perhaps one could be informed by a population and a continent that has been dealing with immigration issues a little longer? I think the Americas have been dealing with the issue for about 520 years.

    143. Re:Plan B. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There are other options that don't rely on firearms...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    144. Re:Plan B. by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Too late. They already are.

    145. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You really are a stupid cunt. Let me break this down for you.

      My point was that the US is a big country with a larger percentage of poor people, this is why there's more crime not because of gun rights.

      We have many different cultures, a huge border with a third world country, and a history of slavery that created an institutionally poor segment of the population. Holland is tiny, far more homogenous than the US, and has a far different divide of cultures.

      Here's an idea, cunt. How about we compare the burglaries per 100k people in South Dakota (324)? I mean per 100k is per 100k, right? How about Danbury CT?

    146. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. Picking "the US" as some sort of monolith is a bit childish, why not say North America? There are lots of places in the US with far better crime statistics than Holland, and lots of other places with far worse.

      "Huge population", btw, implies "huge proportion" in this context.

    147. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      I don't need to backflip, I don't care if the USA is number 1 or not. The only thing lamer than over-patriotism is smug European douchebags ranting about the US.

      I just wanted to point out that guns aren't why we have crime. I live in a place that's safe as shit, I don't care about arbitrary US-wide statistics.

    148. Re:Plan B. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, nabbing a fence is not something to frown at.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    149. Re:Plan B. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Depends if it's an iPad with cellular data or wifi only. The former does GPS, the latter just does location via attempted trilateration of Wifi router strength. Either way, if it's inside, it's not mecessarily going to be accurate to the specific home.

    150. Re:Plan B. by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    151. Re:Plan B. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The US has a larger percentage of institutionally poor people due to our asshole forefathers thinking Slavery was just a grand idea, and due to our border with a third world country.

      No, you have a large percentage of poor people because your country is run by the rich for the rich, more so than any other. And they've managed to persuade the gullible less well off that capitalism is good and social welfare is bad.

    152. Re:Plan B. by MisterMidi · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are no statistics for burglaries per square miles here in The Netherlands. We use the metric system.

    153. Re:Plan B. by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Only if it involved terrorism, and that's much more prevalent in the USA.
      However, since the geolocation data identified the house, has the person tried walking up and asking for his property back?

      Keeping in mind that if the person in whose house it is says no, he'd be in worse trouble, if they do get a warrant(and having the "testimony" of the gps data being denied by the house occupant would be more fuel for a warrant)

    154. Re:Plan B. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Tell me more....

      Putting on eyeball glasses while I snooze so you think I'm listening to your tired nonsense.

    155. Re:Plan B. by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      or abusing 911 resources

      ??

      Every American police department has at least one Porsche. Don't tell me Need4Speed lied to me?

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    156. Re:Plan B. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Unless of course there are 3 officers on duty and there are 4 murders in progress. The most frequent reason for these non response calls is that the local population has completely understaffed their police department for the level of crime. The only way to fix it is to hire more police officers and raise taxes to cover it. Which at least according to one party is an offense of the highest order and the cops should be jailed for not responding to a robbery rather than a murder.

    157. Re:Plan B. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Gloves, Masks and Hawaiian shirts.

    158. Re:Plan B. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The most frequent reason is that crime rates are calculated differently. Different crimes are included or not, the counting methodology is different, etc. It's a sensible as comparing unemployment rates. Once you account for the difference you'll find there is very little difference in rates for comparable size, density and economic status.

    159. Re:Plan B. by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      Even if they do not regard law enforcement as the enemy. I can see where people who live in neighborhoods virtually ruled by criminal gangs are hesitant to get involved. Such gangs are usually heavily armed and extremely violent. Reprisals for people who talk are the norm. Worse if they can't get the actual witness they frequently go after their friends and relatives. Under those conditions I am not surprised witnesses are hard to come by.

    160. Re:Plan B. by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      History class has been a while, but didn't the Europeans invent immigration and multi racial society before there even was a US of A?

    161. Re:Plan B. by MisterMidi · · Score: 1

      I agree, the translation doesn't make much sense. I'm Dutch, so here's my translation:

      Location notification insufficient for warrant

      According to the public prosecution, a notification from an anti theft application on a stolen iPad is insufficient evidence for a search. The owner of a stolen iPad was allegedly told this by the prosecution.

      A resident of Hengelo reported his iPad stolen last month. Because the owner had installed an anti theft application on the tablet, he could locate his iPad within hours of the theft, reports TcTubantia (a local newspaper). The residence was known to both the police and the owner, but the prosecution did not give green light to a search.

      According to a spokesperson of the prosecution, a search is "a very heavy means" and the police can only enter a residence when there's "concrete suspicion against a person" who has to be present within the residence. At the residence in question this was allegedly not the case, as the theft report of the owner included "no objective evidence". The police could have asked the resident permission to enter the residence, but for unknown reasons they didn't.

    162. Re:Plan B. by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      And how much do you think that trial is going to cost you?

      Would you rather spend 1~3 weeks in jail, or spend the money necessary to defend yourself at trial? Because that is what the plea deal will look like.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    163. Re:Plan B. by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2

      Weirdly, it's not true. On average the USA consumes way more cannabis than the Netherlands:
      http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/lif_can_use-lifestyle-cannabis-use

    164. Re:Plan B. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Kind of similar to how you think all Americans are ignorant Americans, and couldn't possibly have any idea other cultures exist?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    165. Re:Plan B. by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      If the local media are to be believed the last year has seen a dramatic up swing in violent crime in DC. Though the murder rate has not followed suite. Still there are enough murders that hardly a weekend goes by without there being another group of them for the media to talk about.

    166. Re:Plan B. by MisterMidi · · Score: 1

      What exactly makes you think that only nonwhites contribute to being multinational? Do the Turks and the Moroccans not count since they're considered caucasian? What exactly makes you think any country with less (visible) ethnic diversity than the US couldn't possibly be called multinational or multiracial? FWIW, I'm Dutch and I see the multicultural society, as we like to call it, every day.

    167. Re:Plan B. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think that. But I live in the US so I'm not must making it up. I also know from experience that many Europeans have ignorant stereotypical views about America and Americans (and other countries too, even their neighbours). My point was that many people make incorrect assumptions because they don't know any better. Much as you just did!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    168. Re:Plan B. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood the poor fellow, he's probably just a Brit with a speech impediment asking for a cigarette.

    169. Re:Plan B. by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Many 3rd world countries...also including certain places in California....Michigan...Illinois...Florida....

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    170. Re:Plan B. by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      You're failing to address the fact that there are far more than 3x as many white than blacks in Connecticut. That's why they call minorities, minorities.

      If you look through the tables, there is for example a nearly 8x higher murder victimization rate among blacks than whites in 2004. So either there are a TON of white people murdering black people and getting away with it, or the rates are much higher among blacks than whites per capita.

      BTW, before I'm called racist, I'm simply correcting a view on statistics. The crime rates among minorities have to do with issues in their communities, not the color of their skin.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    171. Re:Plan B. by tsa · · Score: 1

      But thanks to Geert Wilders we may be more aware of the differences between the different groups of people here. Geert stigmatizes people and does that so well that many ethnic minorities' lives are more difficult since he is around.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    172. Re:Plan B. by Mass+Overkiller · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE the police to arrest people for abuse of the 911/EMS system. I'm a paramedic, we get called for toe pain all the time. That's not hyperbole. I would LOVE to have the police show up so I can say "this jackhole doesn't need an ambulance, he needs reprimand".

    173. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      But, it doesn't stop at the iPad. Once law enforcement breaks down and criminals can act with impunity, it immediately becomes survival of the most brazen and well armed. The only throttle is to temper the brazeness.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    174. Re:Plan B. by MisterMidi · · Score: 1

      Let me feed this troll some popcorn... You seem to be forgetting the EU is continuing to be the biggest economy in the world, despite the crisis. Enjoy your popcorn.

    175. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The statistic you quote has nothing to do with how well guns are protecting anyone. The numbers you want are the answer to the question, "How many thefts are prevented by pistols in nightstands?"

      The stats you quote could all be from homes without nightstands.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    176. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      There are other reasons for which the statistics are meaningless, and don't say anything about the utility of gun ownership. What would the numbers be if we were all disarmed sheep like Hollanders?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    177. Re:Plan B. by sdguero · · Score: 5, Funny

      The point is that America is big, like our penises.

    178. Re:Plan B. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      What's the matter? Has Fox News not told you what to think today?

    179. Re:Plan B. by green1 · · Score: 1

      This is actually something that happened to my father quite a few years ago. He bought a computer from a private sale in the local classifieds, talking to the seller everything seemed to be in order, but just to be safe he called the police and asked if they could check the serial number against reportedly stolen ones, they took down the serial number and told my father that the computer did not appear to be reported stolen. My father paid and took the computer home.

      A few months later he took the computer to a local shop to get more RAM installed, no incident immediately, but a couple days later the police showed up on the doorstep asking to see the computer. Turns out that the computer had originally been stolen from the same shop that my father had taken it to to be serviced, they had never noticed it missing from inventory until it was brought in for the upgrade with an inventory tracking tag still attached.

      The police were actually quite good about the whole thing, they looked at the computer, confirmed it was the one in question, and said they needed to take it in to evidence, my father explained that all his data was on it and he needed a backup, they offered to go away and get a warrant, he stated that a warrent wouldn't be necessary, he believed them, he just needed some time. They then told him to just bring it by the station in a couple of days.

      Unfortunately he ended up out the computer, but because he cooperated with the police, had a reciept from the seller, and had otherwise appeared to act in a reasonable manner, they didn't charge him with anything and gave him time to get his backup. Later he sued the original seller in small claims court and recovered the cost of the computer, and the shop was pretty good about it too and gave him a new computer at their cost because he was cooperative.

      I know people on here frequently talk about NEVER cooperating with the police, always making sure they get a warrant, and you get a lawyer, etc. but had he followed that advice he would not have had time to get the backup, would have been dragged through the courts on a posession of stolen property charge (and possibly convicted as there wasn't much doubt about the fact it was stolen) and been out a fortune in legal fees. As it was he was simply out a bit of inconvenience, and a few hours in small claims court. (in fact I think the new computer the shop sold him ended up costing less than the previous one, and was higher spec, so in some ways he even came out ahead)

    180. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That is why I like my shotgun. Racking it is a very noisy operation, and a very distinctive sound. Mine holds 6 rounds, and I would feel comfortable with throwing three on the ground to make sure the perpetrator actually hears it. If he/she persists, I'd have to considered them out of their damn minds, and would be very afraid for myself and my family if I didn't drop them on the spot.

      My full expectation though, is that on hearing the first racking they'll scream "Oh! HELL!" and run like the scoundrels they are, and then I call the police. I'm ok with that outcome.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    181. Re:Plan B. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Committing a crime to stop a more grievous crime is also a complete defense, provided it's not excessive (n-1 is generally acceptable)."

      And there lies the problem- the word "excessive".

      In my state, if I were to try and defend my property with deadly force (a gun, legally owned) yet there was no "clear and immediately threat to my life", *I* would be arrested and charged with a felony.

      Yep- that's right. There could even be people breaking into my house at night, while I am alone. But if they had no weapons, and I shot them, suddenly I would have to PROVE MY INNOCENCE by trying to convince the Police, the DA, a Jury, etc that I felt my life was threatened.

      SCREWED UP.

    182. Re:Plan B. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"In Holland, like in most of the civilized world, people don't have pistols in their nightstand."

      Oh, that's right. Because in your part of the "civilized world", only all the criminals and government have guns. Law abiding, decent, tax-paying, regular citizens have no right to protect themselves, their family, or their property. They can just call the police and hope they are dead in the 5 to 20 minutes it takes them to get there.

      Very civilized, indeed.

    183. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The crimes they commit there tend to kill people in other countries, so they don't count them against Capital Hill.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    184. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      When a robber confronts someone with a gun it is a big news story, usually because the robber sues the victim and wins.

      The legislature in North Carolina fixed this recently, over the veto of the crazy-ass bitch in the Governor's mansion that went on record saying that we should postpone elections.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    185. Re:Plan B. by AarghVark · · Score: 1

      Its an urban legend, but a good one. http://www.snopes.com/crime/safety/response.asp

    186. Re:Plan B. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the young lady in Oklahoma that spent 30min on the phone with 911, hidden behind a couch, before dropping the assailant that was trying (and, to his chagrin, eventually succeed) to break through her door.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    187. Re:Plan B. by Teun · · Score: 1

      2 - TomTom and Shell, and shell is just a subsidiary of a british company.

      I think you have your comparison topsy-turvy, the name "Royal Dutch Shell" says enough...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    188. Re:Plan B. by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Just because you find something to be easier or more convenient does not make it more right.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    189. Re:Plan B. by MrNaz · · Score: 2

      Search warrants are only a "heavy measure" when the public is using the legal system to uphold their rights. When they are being used by the government of so called "democratic nations" to get around the public's rights, it's a different story.

      --
      I hate printers.
    190. Re:Plan B. by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 1

      In my part of the world that's very unlikely to happen. Murder per 100K people per year is just over 1.

    191. Re:Plan B. by PoolOfThought · · Score: 1

      Most people never experience a home invasion unless they're a criminal.

      Well, most women never get raped unless they're a slut in the first place. Surely you see how idiotic that line of thinking actually is. Let's just assume we're talking about non-criminals and then we can have a sane discussion. I don't know the statistics, but since I've had two homes in which I lived - two different homes actually in two different cities that were simple middle class homes in middle class neighborhoods - broken into I call bullshit on your criminal ties comment.

      Second, I don't think you've put any thought into why people are shooting at close targets. That or maybe you weren't paying any attention in the training you had when you got your conceal and carry... of course I'm assuming that you are a trained gun owner as opposed to just an ordinary gun owner. Both are fine, but if you have not had permit training you might want to sit in a few classes to see why they are doing things rather than making fun of them for it. Here's the deal, for the most part these people have / want their carry weapons to protect themselves from threats. Not just any threats though. Immediate threats. If the threat is a long distance off (more than 20 feet or so), then they can run, take cover, hide, or maybe even just wait it out depending on the distance. The threat isn't an immediate threat at a distance unless they have a projectile weapon of their own. Once they are within about 20 feet the studies show that even with a knife you can be killed by the attacker within about 1 second. At that point you have no other choice other than to eliminate the threat that wants to eliminate you. When you have no other choice is the only time you should be considering the use of your firearm for self defense purposes. Those people you mock are practicing for the right event. Shooting 50 yards down the lane serves no purpose, but to waste ammo and maybe show off a little skill (nothing wrong with that). For the most part they're preparing to deal with an immediate threat, not to get a role in Lethal Weapon 8.

      ... most ardent gun advocates live in areas with very little threat from the 'the bad guys

      To that that this makes their arguments specious actually somewhat begs the question. Are the bad guys such a small threat (do they not even come around) because they know that every one of those "crazy gun nuts" is packin' and will not hesitate to put an immediate end to anyone that intends to harm them or their neighbors? Or is there just some kind of badguy cryptonite buried underground that keeps the bad guys more away than in other places? Even criminals are generally rational in a purely basic psychological since and therefore very interested in self preservation...

      --
      My present is the activity I am currently engaged in with the purpose of turning the future into a better past.
    192. Re:Plan B. by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      We justify gun ownership on the basis that the right to own guns is built into our founding document on very good premises. None of those premises involved "as a deterrent to burglaries", but rather "as a deterrent to any force that would try to become a tyrant".

      You can suggest that we pass an amendment getting rid of that provision, but I think you would find precious little support for it-- and for good reason. The only government that would make such a suggestion is the last one we should hand our guns over to.

    193. Re:Plan B. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Apparently youre not so advanced that youre beyond petty jabs at groups you dont like, though. Is it really necessary to essentially call everyone in the US retards, and then top it off by declaring southern baptists to be even bigger retards?

      Is it possible that there are people on both sides of every debate that dont know how to debate properly, and that you're not the only one tearing their hair out at the ridiculous moderators and the ridiculous positions people take?

      *disclaimer: American Southern Baptist here*

    194. Re:Plan B. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      You'd also have to change the constitution, if you were talking about the US. There's virtually no chance youre getting that ban at the state or federal level until that happens, and it never will (my prediction).

    195. Re:Plan B. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      FWIW, couldnt a gun-ownership opponent point out that technically most of those homicides in the UK were (IIRC) knife related?

    196. Re:Plan B. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"In my part of the world that's very unlikely to happen. Murder per 100K people per year is just over 1."

      Well, that is great for you! But not great for many other people. And there are other serious crimes that are not murder but might still warrant having protection (rape, kidnapping, severe battery, attempted murder, etc). Your original posting essentially said that counties that allow private gun ownership were not "civilized". And that is just plain WRONG.

      In almost every place where private gun ownership is banned, all it does is take guns out of the hands of law abiding, decent, tax-paying citizens. The criminals care nothing about a "ban" or it being "illegal" and can, do, and will obtain, carry, and use firearms.

      I personally think it is "uncivilized" for the State to tell law abiding, decent, tax-paying citizens they have zero right to defend themselves, their loved ones, or their property. Even in areas where crime might otherwise be low. And heaven forbid "civilization" is disrupted by something that quickly breaks down society and totally overwhelms the police, like severe weather, riot, or natural disaster.

    197. Re:Plan B. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need to actually do a little research.
      First, from shell.com:
      "In 1833, shopkeeper Marcus Samuel decided to expand his London business. He sold antiques, but now added oriental shells. He aimed to capitalise on a fashion for using them in interior design. His instinct was right - such was the demand that Samuel quickly began importing shells from the Far East, laying the foundations for his import/export business."

      Which was later merged with Royal Dutch Petroleum.

      Now, if you are going to name the parent company, you should do so by it's full name. Royal Dutch Shell, plc. See, those three little letters "plc" make a pretty big difference, since it makes it a UK company regardless of what the name is. But feel free to call it a dutch company if you want, it is/was partially dutch.

    198. Re:Plan B. by jlar · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough I did not find your comment asking this question to the guy who posted the burglary statistics showing higher crime rates in the US. Why did you only ask it to my post (where you in contrast to the other post can actually find the publication behind the figures)?

      But to answer your question. The data are from a cross country comparison performed by the UN. I assume that they did their best to address your concerns. But feel free to read it up.

    199. Re:Plan B. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Not really. That particular clause is worded quite poorly and the only way it's interpreted in its current form is because that's the current culture and sentiment. If public opinion shifted and became less pro-gun than the supreme court might alter some of its prior rulings to take a narrower view of the second amendment.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    200. Re:Plan B. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Getting back to the original point, even if you want to call Royal Dutch Shell, plc a dutch company, is still isn't as big as either Chevron, or ExxonMobil, both US based companies in the petroleum business, so it's still little compared to the US. You might also want to call BP an American company as well (although I would not) sense they merged with one of the baby Standard Oils (Standard Oil of Ohio), and Amoco (also a US based petroleum company).

    201. Re:Plan B. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      look up the difference in states where carry permits are easy to get (or not needed) vs those where they are, that will give you a better idea

      (heres a hint, if i am in a carry state, im less likely to get shot statistically)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    202. Re:Plan B. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      yeah...that has nothing to do with why we are "poor" i tell you what id rather be "poor" in america than rich in about 95% of the rest of the world

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    203. Re:Plan B. by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      i dont know about you, but i consider someone breaking into my house trying to rob me a tyrant

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    204. Re:Plan B. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I dont, you dont wanna pay the price dont break into my house

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    205. Re:Plan B. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      continues

      if this person is going to break into your house, your castle, you dont know what kind of person he is, I am going to assume hes not bringing me flowers. It is not his home, he is putting your life at risk, his life should be at risk as well

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    206. Re:Plan B. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      What on earth's that got to do with anything? 'Square miles' don't commit crimes, people do. Hence surely crimes/person (or per 100k people) is the sensible metric to use.

    207. Re:Plan B. by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Ooh. +5, Painfully Insightful.

    208. Re:Plan B. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the young lady in Oklahoma that spent 30min on the phone with 911, hidden behind a couch, before dropping the assailant that was trying (and, to his chagrin, eventually succeed) to break through her door.
      And in Oklahoma, where good old district attorney David Prater regularly prosecutes people who defend themselves from criminals past the fullest extent of the law, the lady is lucky to not be in jail now.
      Prater successfully gave life in prison to a man who killed a robber who was holding a gun on him and others in a public pharmacy. Meanwhile, ACTUAL ROBBERS who kill INNOCENT PEOPLE who had no weapon whatsoever, get maybe 25 years. I swear the man must be on the take from the criminals, because he seems to have pledged his reign towards making it safer for criminals to walk the streets.
      The "Make my day" law definitely no longer has any legal standing in Oklahoma.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    209. Re:Plan B. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yep- that's right. There could even be people breaking into my house at night, while I am alone. But if they had no weapons, and I shot them, suddenly I would have to PROVE MY INNOCENCE by trying to convince the Police, the DA, a Jury, etc that I felt my life was threatened.
      SCREWED UP.

      No, it makes perfect sense. Think about it. Somebody breaking into your house might have a weapon, maybe even a gun. That kind of person is dangerous. On the other hand, you are a homeowner who uses the gun for home protection and it is extremely unlikely that you would use it to kill a cop. Therefore, it is much safer to arrest and prosecute you. You might get mad, but you won't shoot anybody because you are a generally law abiding citizen. They know this. That is why police and DAs spend time prosecuting good citizens like us.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    210. Re:Plan B. by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't. America is a miserable place for the poor. The rich in most countries are pretty happy.

    211. Re:Plan B. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      And what do you do if the item you went there for was maybe bought by the unsuspecting victims from the actual thief ...
      Doesn't matter. The police will be there to make sure you don't take your property back from the thief. They are there to protect the bullies from their victims, just like the administrators in high school.
      My mother-in-law tells the story of when her son was young and got his bike stolen. They suspected who stole it was a neighborhood house that was well known for stealing bicycles. They confirmed that the bike was indeed in that persons garage, then called the police. The police did actually show up, and he pointed out his bike in the garage, which had about 40 to 50 bikes in various stages of being broken down into parts. He had the serial numbers, but the bike in question had been partially disassembled. The police said he could take the frame, but when he pointed out his wheels, they said he could not take them because he couldn't prove they were his. So his parents (who were also there) said "What if we just take them anyway"? The cops replied "We will arrest you." The cops are there to protect and serve the criminals. Criminals are dangerous. Cops don't want to mess with them. But law abiding people won't hurt you, so much better to arrest them.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    212. Re:Plan B. by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that is unrelated to guns.

      Vermont has:
      3rd lowest poverty rate in the US.
      2nd most homogeneous population (~95% white).
      2nd oldest population (median age 40 years old).
      Zero large cities, low population.
      Maple syrup.
      Quebec oozing onto it.

      Probably not too many poor thugs rolling around the streets of Burlington, doing drive-bys on other gangs.

    213. Re:Plan B. by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      This is why your post is good advice rather than a joke.

      (I live in Berkeley)

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    214. Re:Plan B. by suppo · · Score: 1

      It is misleading to imply that "America", actually the English colonies and the USA, was the only economy in the world based on slavery. Elsewhere it had a different names: serf, indentured servant, seigneurial privileges, and others.

      Some of my German ancestors were indentured to the Catholic Church, required to work the church's vinyards, had to get the priest's permission to marry, and could not move away without permission. And this was an inherited situation up to the early 1800s.

      Suggest reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom as a starting point.

      --
      NON-geek Linux user since 1998
    215. Re:Plan B. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      And burglaries broken down by a number of other socio-economic and cultural factors.

      From the perspective of cultural heterogeneity or historical development, there is no other country in the world comparable to the US. The closest comparison (at least to the former) would probably be the EU, but nobody likes that because they can't get past the (largely artificial) difference between member borders being international versus intranational. There is very little in the way of potential comparison with the latter.

    216. Re:Plan B. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Societal heterogeneity is not limited to skin color. In fact, skin color is often named only because the person using it as a descriptive device cannot separate the thing that merely correlates with crime (skin color) from the thing that is an actual cause (socio-economic status, cultural norms, etc).

      Much of the crime in the US has nothing to do with population segments that have a history of slavery. However, all those groups do tend to share a history of being repressed for being different than the culture of those who were politically dominant. That's the important heterogeneous aspect; race is the card used by those who can't actually think critically.

    217. Re:Plan B. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Just to chime in on this point, from what I've heard (I've never looked it up myself) the city in Texas I lived while I was in high school (late '90s, early 2000s) and where my parents are still living has the highest concealed carry per capita in the entire state, and also has the lowest violent crimes rate per capita in the entire state.

      I did look it up.

      What you say is very plausible, because what the linked article says is that the wealthiest districts have the highest rate of concealed carry licenses. There's less crime in wealthy neighborhoods.

    218. Re:Plan B. by muttoj · · Score: 1

      You say smug European douchebags. I say intelligent people who try to give you some advise how to run a proper country.

    219. Re:Plan B. by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Just because you find something to be easier or more convenient does not make it more right.

      Hell no it's not right, but the world isn't fair or right...and that's most of the time. It's called picking your battles, and convenience is all relative when you're lying 6 feet under due to an argument over an iPad. Criminals do stupid things. I don't expect that intelligence or arrogance to improve once confronted. To each their own though.

    220. Re:Plan B. by tibit · · Score: 1

      By extension, think of the children. Sigh, this kind of thinking just rubs me all the wrong way. Are there no ways of disabling someone without killing them? You'd think it's a solved problem by now.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    221. Re:Plan B. by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. Picking "the US" as some sort of monolith is a bit childish, why not say North America? There are lots of places in the US with far better crime statistics than Holland, and lots of other places with far worse.

      The US is the richest country in the world, and yet has a very poor record for incarceration, recidivism, and general levels of crime. That is an interesting fact which you seem determined to avoid discussing. I'm not sure why it is childish to compare the US (a country) with another country, it certainly seems to happen in every other domain, so why not violent crime or burglary? I don't think the intention of the comparison was to make the US look bad, or make US people feel threatened, but simply to point out that availability of guns has absolutely no correlation to low crime rates on a country level.

      "Huge population", btw, implies "huge proportion" in this context.

      It means something quite distinct, and implies nothing of the sort, unless you quantify both figures.

    222. Re:Plan B. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Like all ideology, my statement will get crushed by reality. I really can't argue your point, because I believe firmly in pragmatism - and what is a "good idea" changes based on the point-of-view. I was speaking from the point-of-view of society at large.

      Nevertheless, if our system encourages vigilantism, it needs to be fixed. The whole point of the justice and court system is to prevent that sort of thing.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    223. Re:Plan B. by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Take away the guns and no-one has them, or if they do they have virtually no opportunity to use them because the guns and ammo are hugely expensive and the penalties can be huge. It is also pretty fucking obvious that if someone is wandering around with a gun they are insane and breaking the law, not some sort of wannabe vigilante.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    224. Re:Plan B. by trum4n · · Score: 1

      But, experience has proven that to not be true. You can't simply take away every gun in the world. If you could, it would work. But you can't, so they will still exist. Also, as long as there is one gun, everyone else will be under the owners thumb.

    225. Re:Plan B. by trum4n · · Score: 1

      I agree, we have no need for pistols. However, it's to late to prevent them from existing. Nothing we can do about that now.

    226. Re:Plan B. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Then why make it so easy to rant, your culture influences ours greatly, good AND bad. Some people here in the Netherlands are actually starting to celebrate fucking Halloween. Keep your shit on your side of the pond please and don't have idiots like Santorum spouting idiocies about the Netherlands letting them be explained like this "That is how he feels".

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    227. Re:Plan B. by dkorpiflow2 · · Score: 1

      47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot!

      --
      http://provisionalpatentcourse.com/ I help folks file Provisional Patent Applications with a $45 Video Course and Non-P
    228. Re:Plan B. by dkorpiflow2 · · Score: 1

      I LOVE it! 47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot!

      --
      http://provisionalpatentcourse.com/ I help folks file Provisional Patent Applications with a $45 Video Course and Non-P
    229. Re:Plan B. by K10W · · Score: 1

      Yeah I hear same thing, that's a myth. I've got Dutch family (granted most are in Utrecht but those in Amsterdam admit many Dutch don't smoke it although some do it's more the toursists.

    230. Re:Plan B. by cybernanga · · Score: 1

      Disarming the population (if done effectively) reduces the number of guns in circulation, making it harder (and more expensive) for criminals to get hold of illegal firearms.

      --
      www.Buy-Proxy.com - A "buyer-driven" global marketplace.
    231. Re:Plan B. by nobodie · · Score: 1

      As a big American who h as lived in Holland, let me just say that
      1) Dutch people are taller that we are: Schipol airport in AMsterdam is the only airport in the world where I cannot see over the heads of everyone else in the crowd to find the person/ storefront/ exit / whatever that I am looking for. How do you short people do this every day? In fact, Dutch people are the tallest in the world I have read somewhere.

      2) Do not watch Dutch porn. Even men with normal sized penises are bigger than yours, mine, ours. Humbling, humbling.

      3) do not go to a Dutch sauna.It is coed and nude. It is also wonderful and relaxing and has steam and dry heat. tanning booths, reading rooms, tea and coffee and cold baths/ tubs and hot tubs and all the rest for a very modest fee for the whole day if you like (I do, along with my wife and daughters and son), but it will make you....humble, very humble... and very glad that size doesn't really matter, at least so she says.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    232. Re:Plan B. by nobodie · · Score: 1

      As opposed to places where the concealed guns are concealed because they are owned illegally and not registered because they are often used for crimes. Apples and oranges, not useful stats. When I lived in DC in the 90s we had plexiglas windows on the front of fthe house becsuse it was easier to use some tape to cover the bullet holes than to replace glass. Those bullets were not from licensed weapons duh,

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    233. Re:Plan B. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      As I said, it was purely anecdotal, not evidence of a trend. Also, as you said, we're comparing apples and oranges. Not all concealed carry rates are created equal. In my case, it was the rate of lawful concealed carry permits that was being referred to. In yours, it was the rate of illegal concealed carry being referred to. It should be no surprise that the results were different.

      Although, it's also somewhat interesting that D.C. has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, making it very difficult to legally carry while in the city. That doesn't stop criminals from carrying, nor should that point of data when taken with the point of data I offered be taken as a trend, but it's interesting nonetheless.

    234. Re:Plan B. by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is true elsewhere, but In Southern Ontario, Canada, the crime rate per capita is actually much lower in densely popular areas than it is in rural areas.

      You are more likely to be a victim of crime if you live out in the country than if you are an urban dweller.

      Of course, you are going to hear about far more crime happening in the big cities, because when you have 4 million people living in one place vs. 10,000, there is a higher total number of crimes occurring, but people can't do math (myself included) and fear the city and move out the country (I did the opposite)

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    235. Re:Plan B. by alexo · · Score: 1

      arrest someone who did nothing wrong (like Professor Gates)

      You mean the same Professor Gates who refused to provide ID in order to prove that the house they were "breaking into" was their own? Does that mean if I were to break into your house, and the cops showed up because a concerned neighbor had called 911 because they suspected someone was breaking into your house, and the cops asked for ID to prove that I lived there, and I refused, you would prefer the cops to just go on their merry way?

      If the cop thought that Gates was a burglar, he'd have arrested him for "breaking and entering".
      The fact that he was arrested for "disorderly conduct" makes it clear that Gates' identity was satisfactorily proven.

  2. Lessons learnt. by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whatever you do,
    whatever happens:
    Don't call the police.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:Lessons learnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't call the police.

      Unless you're a cop or family member of one. If this was a cop's personal iPad, and not John Q Publics, the story would of read something like:

      "Dutch police and SWAT team raided an apartment early Wednesday morning over stolen goods. The thief was shot multiple times after an iPad with a 'gun-sounds' app installed, was mistaken for a real weapon. As a routine measure, all cops have been placed on paid leave, pending an investigation. No other stolen items were recovered."

    2. Re:Lessons learnt. by MacTO · · Score: 2

      There's cynicism, and then there's paranoid delusions. I'll let you figure out what impression your comment gives.

    3. Re:Lessons learnt. by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Whatever you do, whatever happens: Don't call the police.

      That's incredibly bad advice. My bank called me at work last April asking if I was missing some checks, that someone had tried to cash an obviously forged one. When I got home I found my back door broken open and a lot of stuff gone -- including an almost ful box of checks. I called the cops, who took the report, went to the bank and viewed the video, and arrested the guy half an hour later.

      However, he had accomplices. Over the next year (it's still going on) I would get notices from merchants that I'd cashed checks on a closed account. Of course I cloised if after the theft! I sent all of them copies of the police report, and the fraudulent bastards, every single one, turned them into the county's State's Attorney anyway.

      Had I not reported the burglary I could have wound up in prison for those damned stolen checks.

      If you get in an automobile accident you had damned well better call the cops, because if you don't you're jailhouse-bound. If there is an injury you've committed a felony, and the cops are pretty damned serious about folks leaving the scene of an accident.

      Now, someone attcks you in a bar? Don't call the cops, they're as likely to arrest you as your attacker.

    4. Re:Lessons learnt. by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      It could also be experience.

    5. Re:Lessons learnt. by Gmooron · · Score: 1

      How can this be tagged "informative" ? It's not the police that decides about delivering a warrant or not, it's a judge. And I like it that way, thank you.

    6. Re:Lessons learnt. by Loosifur · · Score: 2

      Besides which, for many things like stolen credit cards, stolen checks, etc., part of your defense against having to honor the checks or the card purchases is to show that you took reasonable steps to mitigate the damage, i.e. reported the theft to the police ASAP. Otherwise, you could just as easily have spent the money yourself and reported the charges as fraudulent to avoid having to pay.

      --
      This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
    7. Re:Lessons learnt. by jc42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "the story would of read something like" This makes no sense.

      The writer obviously speaks a somewhat different dialect of English than you do. Here's a translation to a somewhat more widely-known dialect:

      "The story would have read somewhat like ..."

      Anyone have translations to other dialects? Some people have rather limited understanding of English, and can read only a few dialects; we should be nice and help them out in cases like this. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:Lessons learnt. by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      Had I not reported the burglary I could have wound up in prison for those damned stolen checks.

      No, you couldn't have. Had there been substantial evidence that YOU had personally written them (and I mean witnesses identifying you, you on camera doing it, etc.) you MIGHT have gone a jail for a brief period.

    9. Re:Lessons learnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, at the end of my street, someone had dropped a few hundred dollars in local currency.

      There could have been sinister reasons. Or it could have been a fumbling old man or woman (lots of old people round these parts) now left out of pocket.

      My choices:
      - Leave it - given the weather it would have blown away and/or disintegrated within a few days;
      - Take it for myself, i.e. steal it and open the possibility that I just became involved in something serious, or simply that someone saw me take the money;
      - Take it and give it to charity, i.e. steal it, now leaving the possibility that both I and the charity receiving the money could get into trouble;
      - Call the police, assigning me duty of care for a month (don't even have to hand it in). If no-one reports it, the cash is mine.

      The only viable options are the first option - the coward's option - and the last. I chose the last. Today I'm a few hundred dollars more wealthy.

      Which would you have done?

    10. Re:Lessons learnt. by Quila · · Score: 1

      Always call the cops in a car accident. Long ago I had an accident where someone backed into me while I was parked and still in the car. She said she'd pay, no insurance need be involved (young girl afraid her rates would go up). Then when presented with the bill the dad tried to back out of it saying that couldn't have happened.

      Luckily I won in the end after some frustration, but had the cops shown up there would have been no question.

    11. Re:Lessons learnt. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you obviously lack is life experience. Here is an example in the moving industry in Toronto to help you with that. It is well known that there are scam artists out there who will quote you a price and then try to jack up the prices of the move by charging you a hefty deposit, loading your stuff, and then telling you there were "extra charges for extra work" before unloading. And if you don't pay they drive off with your goods. For the longest time and often even now when you call the police they (would) tell you it is a civil matter, even though it looks, feels, and smells like fraud. Quote from the link:

      I have called the police and reported how I was intimidated and asked to go to the bank and get more money before they even finished loading my furniture, and the officer practically told me that this is a civil matter and there's not much they can do about this.

      I got screwed like this once. But fortunately (if that is even applicable), it was one quite small load. However it has happened to others many times and in many places for hundreds and even thousands of dollars.

      Finally the police arrested one crew for doing this to one poor soul. Then it turned out that the victim in this case was an off duty police officer. This was the first time many people had heard of actual criminal charges in these cases.

      Charming. It's a shame the police didn't cotton on to this earlier: they admit that they ignored many earlier reports because they sounded like civil, not criminal, disputes. What changed? We certainly can't say, but CBC Radio was reporting yesterday that one of the victims of this scam was a police officer.

      Now this was at least a couple of years ago so references are hard to find among all the advertising cruft and bullshit that google always returns, but there should be enough in the links etc I posted to show I'm not bullshitting. The only reason the police did anything was because it was one of their own. That is not paranoid delusions. That is reality. Before you make judgments, get out of the basement or whatever insular world you are in and see the world or at least pay attention to it.

      It is a well know human trait that people protect their own. Police are no different.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    12. Re:Lessons learnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *cough*whitemiddleclass*cough*

    13. Re:Lessons learnt. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I should of thought've that!

      Thanks for the further example. That isn't in my native dialect; I'd have said "I should've thought o' that" instead. I's a fun example of something that should be instantly understandable to any native speaker, but doesn't quite follow any of the "standard" spelling conventions. Some dialects also string together contractions, e.g., "I shouldn't've ...", though I don't think I would. These contractions don't even have standard spellings, as far as I know, though they should also be understandable to a native speaker.

      What I like is getting both a "funny" and a "flamebait" mod for my post. This is probably a case of Poe's Law at work, and it is fun to trigger it in such a transparent fashion. I even included ;-), and the tongue-in-cheek part was still missed.

      Since I first got a flamebait+funny mod several years ago, I've been trying for that plus "insightful" or "informative", but I've never got all three together. Maybe this time ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    14. Re:Lessons learnt. by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Whatever you do, whatever happens: Don't call the police.

      That's incredibly bad advice. My bank called me at work last April asking if I was missing some checks, that someone had tried to cash an obviously forged one. When I got home I found my back door broken open and a lot of stuff gone -- including an almost ful box of checks. I called the cops, who took the report, went to the bank and viewed the video, and arrested the guy half an hour later.

      However, he had accomplices. Over the next year (it's still going on) I would get notices from merchants that I'd cashed checks on a closed account. Of course I cloised if after the theft! I sent all of them copies of the police report, and the fraudulent bastards, every single one, turned them into the county's State's Attorney anyway.

      Had I not reported the burglary I could have wound up in prison for those damned stolen checks.

      If you get in an automobile accident you had damned well better call the cops, because if you don't you're jailhouse-bound. If there is an injury you've committed a felony, and the cops are pretty damned serious about folks leaving the scene of an accident.

      Now, someone attcks you in a bar? Don't call the cops, they're as likely to arrest you as your attacker.

      So what you're saying is the only good reason to call the police is to defend yourself... Thats even better advice than the GP was handing out. The truth is that the police are too busy handing out traffic tickets, and arresting drug addicts, to do their job. Its high time that the police were forced to a return to their responsibility to society. Take the monetary incentive out of the cycle, and the cops would do what they are supposed to, but as long as some part of the department budget is tied to handing out traffic tickets, that's what they're going to do.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    15. Re:Lessons learnt. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      I helped bail out a friend that had closed an account with a year-old $5.00 outstanding check on it. The merchant had sent it to collections (it must have slipped behind a desk for that year)

      Yes, you can be arrested for something simple. Yes, they will come on a holiday (July 4th), when the banks are closed. (Because that's when the criminals are home) A friend and I had to max out ATM withdrawls, plus wallet money to get enough cash for bail.

      In this case, she had written the check, but it was over a year before. The courts should never have been involved. But, the cops were "Just Doing Their Jobs" (tm) Now, she only went to jail for a few hours, but jail is a gateway to prison. Imagine how much more difficult your life could get if someone else in jail starts telling the DA, "That's the guy, That's the guy!" while pointing at you.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    16. Re:Lessons learnt. by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Unless you're a family member of one.

      This used to be the case. I can personally assure you this no longer holds. (at least not in Chicago) If it happened to the cop him/herself, then yes, your comment still holds. But now that quotas and revenue generation seem to have gotten even more of a grip on the city, cops tend to not give a flying fuck about who your family is (unless you're the mayor's family).

    17. Re:Lessons learnt. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If this had happened in the US, I would feel inclined to point out the recent story about the police searching homes for Apple products. http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/09/iphone_5_apple_police.php

    18. Re:Lessons learnt. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Around these parts, the cops will just tell you no if you call them about a fender bender. Heck, I have personally heard cops tell the victims of a hit and run that they wouldn't even take a report because 'it was a civil matter'. There is no money it for the police department when cops take reports on accidents.

    19. Re:Lessons learnt. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      No. That is just stupid. 'Should of' is simply incorrect. Stop excusing this kind of idiocy by calling it a dialect.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    20. Re:Lessons learnt. by jittles · · Score: 2

      If you get in an automobile accident you had damned well better call the cops, because if you don't you're jailhouse-bound. If there is an injury you've committed a felony, and the cops are pretty damned serious about folks leaving the scene of an accident.

      How the hell did you get modded informative? You do NOT have to call the police in the event of an accident. All you have to do is leave your name, phone number, address, and insurance information. If someone is obviously injured, you must also provide medical assistance. You do not have to call the police unless there is a death, hit and run, another crime was committed, or serious injury. How do you prove that you stopped and gave your information? Well the other guy can't claim you drove off if you have his name, address, phone number and his insurance policy info, can he? Calling the police is a waste of your time, their time, and the time of everyone else who gets stuck behind the minor fender bender that doesn't clear for hours because you're waiting for the community service officer to come write up an accident report.

    21. Re:Lessons learnt. by Quila · · Score: 2

      Time to get new cops.

      Or at least fire the police chief.

    22. Re:Lessons learnt. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm. Most checks are only valid for 90 days from issuance, or 6 months if unmarked with a "void after". Any older and it's a "stale dated cheque", which banks need not honor. Presumably, if the account had been closed, the bank wouldn't go to any particular length to honor what they weren't required to.

      Can you elaborate on this story? I'm trying to figure out how the police got involved. Writing a check that bounces may be a criminal act, but a "this check is too old" isn't a bounce, and not paying a bill (other than child support or alimony or something) isn't criminal.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    23. Re:Lessons learnt. by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a dialect, "of" sounds awfully close to "have" when uttered in "should have". It's one of many mistakes that are made because the french have fucked up English writing system so badly...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Lessons learnt. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Even if the check is older than n months, the retailer can still send it to a collections agent, and that agent can call the cops. Just because the bank won't honor the check, doesn't mean the debt doesn't have to be paid.

      This was in a college town, where many checks are bounced. I'm sure the merchant sent the check to collections along with a stack of other checks. Unusally the collections company "buys" the checks for a % of face value. Then they try to collect as much as they can.

      The collection agent may have tried to call the phone number on the check, but my friend had moved since. (This was before cell phones had number portability) When they couldn't get ahold of her, they probably sent the batch to the police to round up as many of the deadbeats as they could. The police are unlikely to have all the details, all they would need to know is "bounced a check". (Even if the check didn't technically bounce, it was treated as if it had) If she had left the county/state it's unlikely to have gone any further.

      Upon bailing my friend out of jail, I advised her, "Get a lawyer". She did, and $500 + $5 later charges were dropped. Yes, the various authorities overreacted, but no, the lawyer didn't think she had a case for damages.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    25. Re:Lessons learnt. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      the...French? Please enlighten me. I can't make sense of that at all.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    26. Re:Lessons learnt. by kbolino · · Score: 1

      My Maryland insurance card specifically states "IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT - NOTIFY POLICE IMMEDIATELY" and has at least since 2004 (when I started driving). Failure to notify may be used against you.

    27. Re:Lessons learnt. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Option 5: take it to the police, hand it over to them, and describe where and when you found it.

      Option 6: mail it anonymously to the police, describing where and when you found it. For the paranoid, this is the safest option that still allows the possibility that the true owner gets his money back.

      Option 7: Canvas the neighborhood, asking if anybody had lost anything. (Can you describe it?)

      Option 8: Put up a poster there, saying: valuables found at this location, call XXXxxxx with description.

      I'm sure there are other possibilities.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    28. Re:Lessons learnt. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      From teh wiki:

      Six states (Arkansas, Arizona, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, and Washington) allow debt collectors to seek arrest warrants for debtors in default if all other collection methods have failed. Whether a debtor will actually be prosecuted or not varies from state to state, county to county, and town to town. The individual is taken into custody and is typically required to submit financial documentation to the courts (to facilitate seizure of assets or wage garnishment), although in some cases the individual may be held indefinitely until a payment plan is reached or the debt is paid in full, especially if the individual is insolvent. Other states have outlawed this type of collection action (Tennessee and Oklahoma have ruled it unconstitutional) unless the court finds that the debtor actually possesses the means to pay—except in the case of child support obligations.

      Most state constitutions, including Minnesota's, have clauses dating to the 1850s that expressly prohibit the jailing of people for their debts. Some people make the claim that it is unconstitutional in the United States to incarcerate someone solely for failing to pay a debt. However, there is little settled law on this matter and plenty of precedent for de facto debtors' prisons.

      More than a third of U.S. states allow borrowers to be jailed for non payment of debts. "Judges have signed off on more than 5,000 such warrants since the start of 2010 in nine counties." Because of “sloppy, incomplete or even false documentation,” many borrowers facing jail time don’t even know they’re being sued by creditors.

      Didn't know that... Guess I'll avoid those states. I'd always thought debt collection was purely civil, unless the debt was "special" (court ordered), like child support or alimony.

      You'd think she could sue the retailer for defamation, at least - accusation of delinquency I'd hope was actionable if made falsely or negligently (lost the check). Or at least legal fees, but it might be tricky to sue the "right" person. IANAL.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    29. Re:Lessons learnt. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      but had the cops shown up there would have been no question.

      Don't be so sure. If the accident happens on a public road/street/etc., you're probably good (in the US, anyway). However, in every locality I've lived in, if the accident takes place on private property the police don't have any authority to issue a ticket. They'll provide you both with an information exchange form, but that's about the extent of it. In my own state, the private property owner has to have contracted with a law enforcement agency to provide police services on his property before the cops (from that specific agency, of course) will officially give a damn.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    30. Re:Lessons learnt. by tibit · · Score: 1

      IIRC: it has to do with William the Conqueror (from Normandy) who invaded and took over England in mid 1000s. They brought French as their language, and set it up as the language of the royal court and of business. English was the language of illiterate peasants, back in those days if you knew how to write you would not speak English in dealing with people at or above your level in the society, neither would you write it. The problem with English was that it couldn't very well express the more complex abstract notions (it would be impossible to translate quite a few ancient works into it, for example): it just didn't work too well for much else besides a rather simple, uneducated life. This lasted for ~400 years. Those Normans were pretty much what shaped the development of written middle English. See this and that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:Lessons learnt. by jittles · · Score: 1

      Well allow me to educate you on why your Maryland insurance card says that. Apparently many insurance companies in Maryland require you to notify the Police and the insurance company within 24-48 hours of an accident. The linked PDF Is from Maryland's state insurance regulatory agency.

    32. Re:Lessons learnt. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Mr. Jittles, Slashdot is read and posted to globally. Please refrain from assuming that the rules followed in your mom's basement apply to the entire world. They don't even apply to many of the states within your own country.

      For instance, in North Carolina, unless it is an accident that totals a vehicle or there is an injury, it is best for the parties to agree who is at fault and for that person to pay for repairs. I have had the person just buy replacement parts for minor incidents and installed them myself. A couple of other times, I've had them pay the body shop. The reason is that a single accident can double your insurance for three years, and with my son being a new driver it is already at $2000.

      However, if you leave and accident without making suitable arrangements, it becomes a hit-and-run, and your ass will go to jail if they ever make an attempt to find you.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    33. Re:Lessons learnt. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      cops are pretty damned serious about folks leaving the scene of an accident.
      Unless the folks leaving the scene are police or a taxi. My friend got hit by a taxi a couple of months ago. She was going straight through an intersection on green, and the taxi was waiting to turn left from oncoming traffic. He turned into her car and struck her car behind the left rear wheel. He did not even stop, but continued going. She called the police, who showed up to take her information. She did not have the license number of the taxi, but they must have worried that she had gotten it, because they did come back about 10 minutes later. They said they had to drop off their fare and it was an emergency so they could not stop. The fare was being dropped off at home after having just been let out of the drunk tank. The taxi driver said my friend had hit them. The fare backed up the taxi driver. Anybody with a brain would know that you cannot run into someone else in such a way as to dent the panel just behind your left wheel. The officer did not issue any tickets, not even for fleeing the scene of an accident. My friend is still fighting with the taxi company over payment.
      Oh, also, we suspect that the taxi company switched drivers before sending the cab back because the one driving originally may have been an illegal alien.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    34. Re:Lessons learnt. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      What you call an anecdote I call learning from someone else's experience. Learning from someone else's experience is something I learned from experience. It hurts less. It's also part of gaining wisdom. But keep thinking the way you do. It won't hurt me as long as you are far enough away. I might annoy me when you open your mouth, but that is another matter.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    35. Re:Lessons learnt. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Of course I cloised if after the theft! I sent all of them copies of the police report, and the fraudulent bastards, every single one, turned them into the county's State's Attorney anyway.
      That sucks, my State's Attorney General won't prosecute a fraudulent check. We got one from a renter for $560, but the Attorney General said they won't pursue it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    36. Re:Lessons learnt. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Writing a check that bounces isn't a criminal act even. Only if there are indicators of fraud is it a criminal act. It requires evidence that the check was written with foreknowledge that the funds did not exist to cover it and there existed intent to not honor the incurred debt.

      That story, if it occurred in the US, is either missing some very important elements explaining the circumstances or it is a fabrication. I'm assuming the former, since people will frequently go out of their way to represent their situation in such a way as to gain sympathy, even if it involves omitting pertinent parts of the story.

    37. Re:Lessons learnt. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      If only it were that easy to get around police Guilds and whatever organization represents Lieutenants & Chiefs. Usually, that's almost impossible to do.

    38. Re:Lessons learnt. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state, and the estimated damages. There are, in fact, some states which require a police report to be filed in the case of an accident where the property damage exceeds a certain threshold even if there was no crime committed and no injury.

    39. Re:Lessons learnt. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Writing a check that bounces isn't a criminal act even

      Incorrect.

    40. Re:Lessons learnt. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Fraud typically requires intent, and that site doesn't even attempt to make cursory coverage of what actually constitutes fraud. The person who designed it should be charged with criminal abuse of my eyesight though...

      What the site does cover is civil penalties which can come into play even absent a criminal act.

      So while a bad check may be actionable as a civil matter, it is still not a criminal act unless it meets the rest of the standards I previously outlined.

    41. Re:Lessons learnt. by Goat+of+Death · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe it's correctly said:

      "Da story woulda read sometin like..."

    42. Re:Lessons learnt. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That site was just the first google hit. Yes, it's f'ugly.

      So while a bad check may be actionable as a civil matter, it is still not a criminal act unless it meets the rest of the standards I previously outlined.

      It is in Illinois. My house was broken into last Aprile and a box of checks stolen. I closed the account, of course, and called the authorities who actually arrested one of them that evening. But the accomplices went on a check cashing spree, and for the last year I've been harrassed by the Sangamon County State's Attorney being threatened with legal action including incarceration. Of course, if it ever got to trial the idiot State's Attorney would be laughed out of the courtroom since none of the checks have my signatures, and all the merchants pressing charges should be arrested for filing false reports, but that won't happen.

      Today's Illinois primary and I'm registering as a Republican just so I can vote against the corrrupt, incompetent jackass. I'll probably have to vote against him in the general election as well. But you can go to jail for bad checks, intent to defraud or not.

  3. Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine in California had his house broken into. His iPad and a shotgun were stolen. He tracked the phone to the trunk of a car, told the police, and they did nothing.

    1. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

      He tracked the phone to the trunk of a car, told the police, and they did nothing.

      Consequently, if anything happens to the vehicle he tracked the phone to or the person who owns it, your friend will become suspect #1, all because he made the mistake of talking to the police.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Police are just there to "stop" drugs, "stop" prostitution, and beat protesters. They don't actually care about crime that affects the average person. I've had a gun pointed at my head for trying to ask directions, but when I get robbed, they won't even take a report because "the phone system is down and you have to drive 40 minutes to make the report in person". But oh, you'll make me turn my marijuana-legalization-themed shirt inside out at my sister's public high school graduation under threat of arrest. It's good that we have our fucking priorities straight.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    3. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by wjhoffman1983 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the way it should be. Any Joe Programmer can make an app that makes it look like stolen goods are behind that closed door. Taking evidence from theft prevention and tracking apps is the exact same as taking the victim's word for it.

    4. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We have warrants and rules of evidence for preventing that type of abuse. In theory anyway :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Skater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This could be the most insightful comment so far. The police supposedly use and believe Lojack; what would it take for them to rely on Apple's Find My Phone (or whatever it is) and equivalent similar options for electronic devices?

    6. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Taking evidence from theft prevention and tracking apps is the exact same as taking the victim's word for it.

      Agreed. And that word has been good enough in the past.

    7. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      money

      lojack makes enough money that it can contribute to the right political campaigns so that the police take them seriously

    8. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny

      A friend of mine in California had his house broken into. His iPad and a shotgun were stolen. He tracked the phone to the trunk of a car, told the police, and they did nothing.

      Perhaps they were skeptical because he seemed to believe that either his iPad or his shotgun was a phone.

    9. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by wjhoffman1983 · · Score: 2

      Hardly. Are you saying that if I walk into a police station, grab an officer, take him outside to a random car and tell him that my phone is in the trunk then that would be good enough to get him to crack it open? That essentially what I would be doing if I was using a tracking app. That tracking app evidence has the same weight as my words because for all the officer knows I could have written that app to track anything to any destination I want.

    10. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      That's manageable. Get the person reporting the crime to sign a witness statement that they have got the data honestly and in good faith.

      If you wind up with someone abusing the system to get raids on their enemies - then you can prosecute them for giving the police a false statement, wasting police time, etc.

      Policing is frequently (mostly?) done on the basis of what someone says.

    11. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by kikito · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not the same thing.

      The sworn statement means "if later it is discovered that I was lying, then I'm committing a crime".

      If an app says that my iPad is in a house, and that turns to be false, then I'm not commiting a crime - I'm not "responsible" for what the app says.

    12. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by kikito · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      If the victim has lied, she goes to jail. If the app lies, the victim goes free.

    13. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by forkfail · · Score: 1

      This whole argument is one giant strawman.

      If you believe that GPS and signals from a phone to another device work, then there is strong reason to believe the victim when he claims he knows where his property is.

      If you think that cell phones and their related technologies are actually magic devices that only work under certain conditions, then maybe not so much.

      --
      Check your premises.
    14. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I always wondered if these tracking solutions were worth anything, I should have known it was too good to be true...that was my idea for securing a valuable car as well, crap...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by eepok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Liability. It always comes down to liability. Lojack stands behind their product and their training. That's why police departments trust it. It's the same with OnStar calling an ambulance on your behalf or your ability to prove that a car belongs to your by showing matching photo ID and vehicle registration. These are well funded systems with throngs of support people, very high risk, and thus very high insurance for their products and actions.

      When liability is externalized and the PD can point to another entity to say, "Hey, it's their system. If they're wrong and we do wrong by trusting them, they will hold the liability." When they can't, they don't trust the external identification system.

      If you want the PD to trust Apple's Find My Phone or similar programs, they have to start a relationship with various PDs, give them training, and have massive insurance themselves. Then the cost of such programs will go up and actually start to match the value of the service (just like Lojack).

    16. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps allow private tracking beacons to be used as evidence for search warrants (not for anything else, because you could do all kinds of bad stuff by faking the location of certain items) and then have a law that sets out a massive punishment for faking location info for this purpose (I don't think inaccuracy will be a problem for long). Problem solved?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    17. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that if I walk into a police station, grab an officer, take him outside to a random car and tell him that my phone is in the trunk then that would be good enough to get him to crack it open?

      Depends what you say. If you give no reason for your assertion, then no, it wouldn't. If you say that you saw someone grab your phone and put it in the trunk of that car, then yes, that would be sufficient.

      That tracking app evidence has the same weight as my words because for all the officer knows I could have written that app to track anything to any destination I want.

      And the officer also knows that I would face both criminal charges and the risk of a civil suit for slander, if I make this charge frivolously or alter the tracking program maliciously.

      There is a legitimate reason for why the police would ignore the results of a tracking app, namely, if it's been wrong before. But they wouldn't legitimately ignore evidence because it's just the word of the victim.

    18. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          You have to consider what the other possibilities are.

          I see a guy put an iPad in the trunk of his car. I call the police and say that my iPad was stolen, and describe the car and the license place number. So what do they do? Arrest the guy with the iPad, and let you walk with it?

          Your evidence is shaky at best. So you put some tracking software on his device? You fabricated some evidence? It's not unreasonable to believe that you may spend a few minutes fabricating evidence to steal a $500 toy.

          If it were something like a stolen car, you'd have a better chance with it, because the car is registered with the state. If you've identified him, file a civil charge against him.

          We had an incident in California, where a friends store was shot up in the middle of the night. We compiled video evidence from the surveillance cameras. He circled the building once before shooting out the front windows. There were distinguishing marks on the vehicle. A couple store employees recognized the vehicle, and identified who the owner was. We went to the guys house, and I shot video of the distinguishing marks on the vehicle and license plate number. I wrote an affidavit stating the evidence discovered, the purpose of making the video of the vehicle, when and where the videos were made, and other details that I personally knew and discovered.

          We provided the videos and affidavit to the police. It got stuck in a pile and ignored. It took about 2 weeks, and multiple calls from the owner of the store to finally get a detective to look at it. When he did review it, he thanked us for handing him the case on a silver platter.

          They cross referenced it with other cases, and found the same caliber weapon was used in other incidents in that area, on the same night.

          With this evidence, they got a search warrant for the guys vehicle and house. When they arrived, he told them everything. He was drunk, and pissed off, so he shot at businesses that he thought had wronged him. He told them where to find the gun, which was under the seat of his vehicle.

          Video evidence of the crime. Identification of the person involved, and vehicle involved, with a few affidavits stating the facts. That's evidence.

          If I just said "Hey, my iPad is in the trunk of his car, go arrest him" isn't evidence. Sure, they could ask him. What's he going to say? "No, that's my iPad." It falls into "unreasonable search and seizure" if they search his car anyways.

          Consider the opposite.

          I know you have an iPad. So I call the police and say you stole my iPad, because I can show the IP belongs to the same provider that yours does, or the GPS signal was last seen in the vicinity of your house. You'd be very upset to have the police knocking on your door, demanding to search the premises for a stolen iPad, and even more so if they seized *your* iPad with some schmuck saying "nope, that's mine".

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    19. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Hatta · · Score: 2

      But oh, you'll make me turn my marijuana-legalization-themed shirt inside out at my sister's public high school graduation under threat of arrest.

      Seriously? You did that? Rights are like muscles, they get weak if they're not exercised. You need to flex your rights more.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Had he not reported the stolen shotgun and the thief got caught shooting someone with it, they'll assume he sold the firearm to a convicted felon and arrested him.

      Yes, if the thief is the victim of an attack, he'll certainly be a "person of interest" but do you rally think a criminal is going to call the cops because somebody beat the shit out of him? The thief won't even call the cops if your friend broke the thief's trunk open and got his phone and gun back.

      Thieves generally avoid the police whenever they can.

    21. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      Yea, my sister was doing the sign-language translation for the graduation speech, and I kinda didn't want to miss that. I did say no to the very same school administrators that once had control over me. They had to go get the cops. And my dad wore the shirt out on the way out. Yeah, I could have had awkward court dates where I had to drive 4 hours home from Virginia Tech, and we could have strained the 2nd mortage my dad took out to pay for my college after being laid off from USPS after 20 years right when I started a bit more by having to pay for a lawyer for a civil suit in addition to tuition..... Or I could have seen my sister graduate, and not been arrested on TV, because they televise graudations here.

      The shirt has hands with handcuffs, holding marijuana leaves, with the words, "Land of the free?" under it.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    22. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by pz · · Score: 1

      This is the way it should be. Any Joe Programmer can make an app that makes it look like stolen goods are behind that closed door. Taking evidence from theft prevention and tracking apps is the exact same as taking the victim's word for it.

      Except that the report from the theft prevention software should be independently verifiable by the police, and presumably contains serial numbers that the claiming victim can demonstrate match his property by using paperwork from the original purchase.

      Now, it could be that the claiming victim actually sold the iPad to the accused, and is trying to use the legal system to steal it back, but that's for a court to decide based on presented evidence.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    23. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Wait - you mean that NOBODY in the police department has an iDevice or a mac? You can do the "find your iPhone" from ANY iDevice - just borrow the chief's wife's phone, click on the app, put in your Apple ID and pwd, and it comes right up. You could argue that Apple is untrustworthy, but there's no reason to believe that Apple is involved in maintaining your ruse so you can have the cops bust in on your ex's boyfriend.

      What part of GPS location does the police department not understand?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    24. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      sworn statement means "if later it is discovered that I was lying, then I'm committing a crime".

      Yeah, so what you should do instead is tell the police that there's a phone at a specific location that's sending out unlicensed copies of copyrighted works. They'll believe that without any evidence or sworn statement, go retrieve the phone without a warrant, and charge the owner of the house or car with criminal infringement.

      At least that seems to be how such things work these days. Depriving someone of valuable real property like a smartphone isn't a crime worth bothering with; sending a friend a copy of something that someone wrote but doesn't want made public is a serious criminal offense.

      (But good luck getting the stolen phone back in either case. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    25. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      And my dad wore the shirt out on the way out.

      Kudos to your dad. You probably made the wise decision.

    26. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      LoJack is vetted, and they will not tell YOU where your car is. Only the police. Big difference... Also, why I will not use LoJack.

    27. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      You mean if I tell the police "I saw a guy take my expensive thing and he brought in in there" that's not enough for a search warrant?

    28. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't personally say "wise", so much as "practical", but thank you.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    29. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by cardpuncher · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it seems significantly more responsible than the behaviour of the Nottingham constabulary who left an innocent man with a bill for fixing his front door:

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9108550/Police-break-into-wrong-house-after-iPhone-mistake.html

    30. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      If you believe that GPS and signals from a phone to another device work, then there is strong reason to believe the victim when he claims he knows where his property is.

      It's not just a question of whether you believe GPS is real tech or magic. It's also a question of whether or not you believe some coordinates someone gives you, are the GPS result (and an accurate and up-to-date result, as well as probably some other caveats that I can't think of off the top of my head)

      If I go tell someone that I saw you steal my computer, and I want them to use force against you to get my computer back, the reliability of my eyesight is not their only concern.

      I'm not saying my assertion that you stole my computer should be blown off (obviously I'd like that investigated) but we're talking about sending people to point guns at you or damage your locks based on my word. I might be motivated by malice or simple error (maybe I made a programming mistake when I told my computer to tell me where it is). How do you feel about that?

      Understanding GPS is only part of this.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    31. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Lol. I actually don't remember if it was an iPad or an iPhone.

    32. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i-devices have unique serial numbers, sim numbers, etc. These are registered with service providers. It should be a very simple matter to identify the true owner of a device by making a single phone call.

    33. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      That's why when you make a "large" purchase, especially from someone you don't know you should get a reciept showing exactly what you bought.

      I bought a boat from a neighbor. We've had a lot of thefts in our property. I trust the guy, he trusts me. But I still got a bill of sale just in case. It was heck of a deal on the boat and I wanted to be in the clear if anything ever happens.

    34. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Yes, if the thief is the victim of an attack, he'll certainly be a "person of interest" but do you rally think a criminal is going to call the cops because somebody beat the shit out of him? The thief won't even call the cops if your friend broke the thief's trunk open and got his phone and gun back.

      In the USA, someone actually called the police because someone robbed him and took his illegal drugs away. Police actually caught the robber, and they got two convictions.

    35. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine in California had his house broken into. His iPad and a shotgun were stolen. He tracked the phone to the trunk of a car, told the police, and they did nothing.

      He should have his lawyer talk to the police. That is what Apple did, and it worked wonders.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    36. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or you could have used your sister's graduation as an occasion to make it about her instead of your I Must Smoke Dope top priority. I'm not talking about your decision to go along with the required decorum by turning the shirt inside out. I'm talking about your making the decision, of all things you could have worn, to wear that bit of adolescent nonsense to her formal event. Man, do you even listen to yourself?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    37. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Hey asshole - there was no fucking required decorum. Eat a dick. This was 3000 people walking into a stadium. Again: Eat. A. Dick.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    38. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Somehow I don't think you'd be quite as appalled if he wore an American flag. Can you at least admit that if the principle wasn't asking people to invert tacky patriotic clothing he shouldn't have been asking people to invert tacky expressions of dissent?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    39. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      to wear that bit of adolescent nonsense to her formal event.

      Fuck off, Scentcone.

      You'd be singing his praises if the handcuffed hands on the shirt had been holding a pistol and underneath it had said "Chicago: Land of the Free?"

      There's nothing adolescent about freedom.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    40. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by hjf · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they (usually) only do the heavy beating to guys with a record.

    41. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by slimshady945 · · Score: 1

      I've had a gun pointed at my head for trying to ask directions, but when I get robbed, they won't even take a report because "the phone system is down and you have to drive 40 minutes to make the report in person".

      The cops pulled a gun on you for asking directions? I'm glad I live in Detroit, where it's safe. I mean, seriously... I look at a lot of these comments, and I never experienced anything like it in Detroit (Brightmoor, for those familiar with the city) in the 80's and 90's Sure, some of my reports went a bit unnoticed, but back when the murder rate was 70 / 100,000 people; bicycle thefts aren't that important. I feel bad that so many people have to deal with shit like that, and I'm glad I don't.

    42. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Since when did graduations stop being solemn events and stop requiring decorum? At the very least I would expect someone to wear at least slightly better than what they'd wear on a normal day. What will the slogan say on the tee shirt you wear to her wedding?

    43. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      So? Being a suspect or person of interest doesn't mean a damn thing. What matters is being charged with something.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    44. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      It was more how I asked for direction. You see, I thought you could pull over behind a cop and walk up and ask him for help. Silly me. It's really hard to hear commands on a windy day when the wind is blowing the opposite direction and you see lips moving and a person with a gun pointed at you, but can't hear what they are asking. It's also hard to roll down your window after getting back in the car when you've left your keys on the hood and it's power windows. Awwwwwkward. But he didn't cite me for my overdue inspection. It was my first day at a new job. I had just moved up here. I didn't know if I was going the right way on the highway. This was 1999. I have a GPS now in 2012, but still no cell phone.

      Oh I forgot to add when I was out of gas in Philly, and a cop shined his light on us and told us the station was closed. "We're out of gas!" we yelled back. "Oh well", he said on the loudspeaker, driving away. But again, there's two sides to things: In my panic to find a gas station at 3AM in seemingly-dangerous neighborhoods with my car computer telling me I had 0.0 miles of gas left, I ran several red lights in front of several cops (not wanting to waste gas to brake and reaccelerate), and they didn't seem to care about that either.

      Society doesn't seem to quite work right.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    45. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ClioCJS · · Score: 2
      Probably around the time that people got sick of pompous assholes like you telling them how to live their lives.

      I wore a suit at her wedding, but I fucked up the toast and said her ex-husband's name instead. Fail.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    46. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      In small towns, police serve at the pleasure of a small number of people. If they abuse the locals, they don't stay employed very long. A lot of displeasure with police could be avoided if control were local and obvious.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    47. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What if you are willing to be?

    48. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ScentCone · · Score: 1
      Why not actually ask me what I would say?

      I'd say the same thing. Anyone who decides to make someone else's graduation ceremony about their own pet political cause is an ass. Simple as that.

      There's nothing adolescent about freedom

      But there is when it comes to deciding to make your focus on freedom all about wearing pro-weed sloganeering to someone else's academic graduation. Why not just stand up during the ceremony and start chanting and holding up Occupy The Graduation signs? Freedom, man! Nobody should be allowed to graduate in peace while there are people who can't smoke dope while in line at the DMV, and enjoy a little meth while on a break at work.

      Adults use their freedom like they're not 12-year olds. There's nothing adolescent about freedom, but there are stupid, adolescent ways to show your contempt for it and for the people around you. Putting imaginary words in my mouth doesn't change that.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    49. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I don't care how you live your life. But if it were my daughter or sister graduating, I'd still think you were an ass for making the event about your weed politics.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    50. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So? Being a suspect or person of interest doesn't mean a damn thing.

      If by "a damn thing" you mean "you won't be constantly harassed and intimidated by police," then you're absolutely correct.

      Face it, it doesn't matter if you actually commit a crime; being the overgrown bullies they are, cops will fuck with you endlessly if they think you might have so much as considered it... which only serves to further my point that you should never talk to cops.

      Unless you like getting fucked with, I guess.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    51. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      All right, fair enough, I did put words in your mouth.

      The guy was wearing a shirt. He didn't say anything about it, didn't try to "proselytize", etc. Then the school decided to single him out and harass him. I certainly wouldn't expect that as a result of wearing an innocuous shirt, so I don't think the OP's intent was to "make it about himself" and cause trouble.

      While your tone is clearly derisive when it comes to the drug legalization movement, kudos for saying that you'd be against wearing a pro-2nd amendment shirt to the event, even though that's something you believe in.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    52. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by flowwolf · · Score: 1

      It's not the reliability of the technology I'm concerned about. The reliability of the data coming from those devices are. As far as law enforcement officials are concerned, and rightfully so, any device that hasn't been documented in detail for their department should be considered a magical black box that could do any number of things.

      I thought we were on Slashdot. Isn't this the entire primary concern for FOSS being such a big deal? Binaries are essentially magical black boxes that could report anything.

    53. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Yes. It happens every day. How else do you expect to recover stolen property? You make a sworn statement to the police. If you are lying, they can bring you up on criminal charges.

    54. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by kikito · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. You can't tell a judge "I take responsibility for what this application does". Legal responsibility is a very well defined legal concept, and it's not given "on demand".

      AFAIK it's reserved for very specific situations, like minors and their tutors, or people under domiciliary arrest.

    55. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Think about the crime stats around the world.
      Everybody wants low numbers, great success in finding bad guys and the need for ever expanding budgets... how can all that be pulled out of real world crime stats every year that the press get to see?
      The US shows the way via : http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-03-07/news/the-nypd-tapes-confirmed/
      "Officers were told to arrest people who were doing little more than standing on the street, but they were also encouraged to disregard actual victims of serious crimes who wanted to file reports."
      If your really really good with your yearly stats you get http://jalopnik.com/5889692/the-texas-state-police-now-has-a-crazy-gunboat-fleet @$580,000 per 34-foot speed boat :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    56. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My daughter had a bicycle stolen. She called the cops in Somerville MA. They laughed at her so she put up posters all over Somerville. Someone saw a bike fitting the description behind the restaurant where she had locked the bike up. So she called the police again and told them that she was going to go there and that they had better show up because she was going to make a serious scene if the bike was hers. They laughed at her. She went anyway.

      Of course the bike was hers and she called the cops again, then she called the mayor, and the state police, and the state Attorney General, the INS and finally the Governors office. I have no doubt that she would have called the FBI ... and the President of the US if she had to. Needless to say the Somerville cops were shamed into responding. She got her bike back and the INS arrested a dozen illegal aliens and now both the Mayor of Somerville and the Governor of Massachusetts know her by name.

    57. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It falls under "unreasonable search and seizure". A police officer can't say "open the trunk of your car, remove the ipad, and demonstrate to me that you can unlock it and use it." That's stopped dead at "open the trunk of your car."

          It's funny, when it goes the other way, people scream about their rights and the government overstepping their bounds.

          "What?", you may ask...

          If/when the TSA, DHS, federal, or local police say "unlock your laptop so we can inspect it", that's the evil government trying to gain access to your private stuff.

          During a traffic stop, or any interaction with the police where your vehicle is present, when they ask you to give them access to your vehicle, you can say "no". For them to demand access, they *have* to have probable cause. That probable cause isn't "because I have this app that says so."

          Probable cause is ... There is an eye witness will testify that he took the stolen property. That an eye witness will testify that that he saw the stolen property placed in the trunk of the car. If the contraband is visible through the windows of the vehicle, that does constitute probable cause. Part of a gun sticking out from under the seat.. A joint sitting in the ashtray. The smell of drugs from outside of the vehicle without breaking privacy laws including illegal search and seizure. Upon such evidence, they can obtain a search warrant, and go farther.

          As it stands, there is no one to testify that the suspect stole the property, and placed it in the trunk of that car. The only thing that says so is an app of some origin. Is there case law which says that such evidence is admissible in court?

          I could write up an app, and put up a web site that says "My stolen iPad is at these coordinates". Sounds like a nice way to screw with people. At very least, if such data was accepted as evidence, I could get someone's device seized, and them arrested for at least a night.

          If I were the DA, or whatever the Dutch version of it is, I wouldn't take some guy's word on the results of an app that he installed, as solid evidence for anything. Here, it would be thrown out of court on an improper search and seizure. It doesn't matter if it is or isn't stolen.

          It's kind of like cops kicking in the door of a suspected meth lab, just because they think there might be something going on. They just can't do it. We have laws for a reason, and they *are* for your protection. Would you like your front door kicked in twice a week because the cops thing there *might* be something illegal in the house? That's all the evidence that's been provided. "might". Not "is". No conclusive proof of anything.

          I know I'm putting this in the context of the United States, just as the majority of people reading this are.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    58. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Right, but that assumes you can get *to* them. To be able to get to identifying numbers, you have to have a legal way *to* them. To get a search warrant for someone's car or home, there have to be probable cause, which is a discernible belief that a crime is being or has been committed. It's the law, or at least in the United States. To execute such a search, a search warrant is required.

          There are only a few exceptions.

          * Evidence of the crime is visible without violating the search and seizure laws.

          Example: A police officer knocks on your door, and you answer. In plain view from the front door are drugs and drug paraphernalia. The officer now has probable cause to enter without a warrant.

          Another example: A police officer sees a joint in the ashtray of a car, in clear view from outside of the vehicle. A crime (possession of contraband) is being committed.

          * A private location is used during the commission of a currently pursued crime.

          Example: You rob a bank. You run from the cops. You make it all the way to your home, go inside and lock the door. They can use any means necessary to pursue you, including forcing the door open.

          What is *not* a viable example is...

          You are driving in your car. A police officer stops you, and his gut instinct says you may have drugs, guns, or stolen iPads in the trunk. There is not discernible probable cause. Driving or having a car is not probable cause for a warrant-less search. He can *ask* you to search your car. You *can* waive your rights, so he can search your car. Anything found in the car that may be related to a crime can now be probable cause for an arrest.

          To extend this last one, if you have hand tools in your car (screwdriver, hammer, pry bar, etc), they *could* be used in the commission of a crime, and you *could* be arrested for possessing them. As with many things, the difference between a hammer being used for criminal activity, an a hammer used to put nails into wood is completely up to how it's used. If a hammer was used in a recent crime, it *could* be possible that you would be arrested, and charged in that crime. It's doubtful if you'll be convicted, but stranger things have happened.

          Never, unless you have extremely good reason to, waive your rights.

          So, no, it is not reasonable for the police to demand access to your vehicle to verify the identifying information. ... and, IANAL. Check with your local council for laws applicable in your jurisdiction.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    59. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      That's a major problem with the US. Even those who support rights typically only support a subset of them. Those they disagree with are the subject of derision. Only protest they support is valid and deserving of protection from abuse by authorities. Well, unless they're those who don't believe in any rights at all, just whatever is "good for society" at the moment.

    60. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Mod up! Really great comment.

    61. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by ncohafmuta · · Score: 1

      "Despite the fact that the rightful owner was able to locate his iPad within hours of the theft, thanks to the anti-theft application he had installed"

      It's not a very good anti-theft application if the iPad was stolen!
      They should call it something else, no?

    62. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In California, people actually call the police because their federally illegal drugs get taken away. Sometimes the police catch the robber, and give back the drugs.

      Moral is, some states are better than others

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In California *I* can arrest you for theft of my property if I SEE you do it.

      If someone tells a cop that someone has stolen goods in their trunk that's probable cause unless they have reason to believe that the person is bearing false witness.

      Probable cause is sufficient for a search of a vehicle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    64. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Related situation: You're walking down the street with a backpack. No cause to search your pack. Someone tells an officer you have drugs / a bomb / a stolen baby in your pack. Now there's cause to search.

    65. Re:Happened to a friend of mine. by tqk · · Score: 1

      What a lovely get up to [wear] to your sister's graduation. Stay classy.

      You are very aptly named, AC. Back at ya.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  4. Bias by DEFFENDER · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And once again we find that it's only true to a government if their own agencies or personnel tell them it's so. A private citizen should be able to produce evidence and have it considered with the same weight as something produced by a policing force. Providing obtaining that evidence didn't violate the law in any way.

    You can bet that if it had been the police that can up with that GPS location they would have a warrant in hand tight now.

    --
    Careful what you say around me.. I will assume you mean it.
    1. Re:Bias by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 2

      I have evidence that DEFFENDER produces and distributes meth.

      how's that feel?

      in the article case the evidence in question DOES violate the law. laws for unreasonable search and seizure.
      if only the US were more strict about issuing search warrants, and more restricted when they do...

      in my above example, my statement may fall under freedom of speech. it may also fall under libel. either way it's certainly inadmissible. but that won't matter much if they get a broad warrant and find a gimp tied up in your basement, will it?

      (IANAL, and i have no evidence against this upstanding citizen)

    2. Re:Bias by bdraschk · · Score: 1

      I live in a two story house with seven parties. Indoors GPS should not work, so location
      services are probably only good enough to mark the house (my Android tells me: Accurate
      to 30 meters). I, for one, would be thankful if the police would refrain from searching all seven
      flats, just because some random dude claims his iPad is somewhere in this
      vicinity.

      Not that the police wouldn't search my home if they were told i was downloading music illegally
      from the internet...

  5. Different in the States by mholve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here they walk in and take all your meth, instead.

    1. Re:Different in the States by mholve · · Score: 1

      Link would help... http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_20096845

    2. Re:Different in the States by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
      Interesting aside to that story: according to the cops who "made the bust" (read: accidentally stumbled onto the operation like the Keystone Kops they are):

      The officers didn't have a search warrant, so they knocked on the door of the apartment and asked the occupants for permission to come in. They consented, Tomkins said.

      "They probably thought if they didn't, we'd suspect something," Tomkins said. "Or they thought, 'I'll let them in -- they probably won't find anything.'"

      Anyone who's ever met a meth dealer/cook (and here in the Meth Capital of the World, I've met more than my fair share) can tell you, something about the officer's story doesn't add up; drug dealers don't just let cops into their homes, especially when they're sitting on enough poison to ensure a long, long prison sentence. I could almost believe it if the dealers were geeking their balls off and thus fairly unaware of their surroundings; but again, based on my experience, anyone with $35 million worth of drugs around the house probably aren't users, and sure as hell aren't knowingly letting the fuzz through the door without a fight.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  6. Hardly a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Dutch police doesn't even enter an house when there are two of them and they literally hear someone get tortured to death. I'm not making this up; this actually happened. The officers in front of the house could hear screams and moans and did absolutely nothing.

    Want more? Neighbors heard a woman cry and scream for help and it sounded so distressful that they called the police. The police came, rang the doorbell an after a small talk they left, never to bother with his again. 3 months later it turned out that the woman in question was being held by her will, prostituted, treated in extreme inhumane ways and well... "The police thinks they may have made a mistake by not entering the premices".

    And the list goes on and on.

    On the positive side. If you manage to speed a little on the Dutch highways (you know, reckless driving where you dare to drive 85 - 86 km/hr instead of the allowed 80 km/hr) then chances are very high that you will get a speeding ticket. That's where the Dutch police truly excels.

    So quite frankly, within this context this can hardly come as a surprise.

    1. Re:Hardly a surprise... by jwijnands · · Score: 1

      Dutch police make mistakes, just like everywhere else. And when a police officer makes a mistake that can have dire consequences. However in this case our police forces wanted to do something, they requested a search warrant. Actually doing something about a minor theft is rare enough that that in itself is almost worth a headline. However for some strange reasons they were not granted a search warrant which is bizarre.

    2. Re:Hardly a surprise... by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      Hindsight is 20/20, isn't it?

      They went to that house, found nothing suspicious, and thus nothing to go on with regard to entering the house due to a situation of duress, nor anything to get a warrant for a search.

      Yes, it's horrible what happened to that woman. On the other hand, I don't think it's desirable that if I, and a few neighbors, just call the police saying there's screaming from your house, that the police come busting though your door, guns drawn, only to find you enjoying a cup of coffee - but hey, that's what you get for partying a little too loudly the week before.

      Same here - yeah, the guy claims that the iPad claims it's somewhere. But in NL, that's simply not enough for a search warrant.
      It should be enough for further investigation, but that's different from a search warrant. On the other hand, with half the population telling the police to go catch some 'real' criminals, a stolen iPad may be very low on the list of priorities for the cops in that department.

      Good job on making a polarizing post, though - complaining about speed tickets is always highly popular and suggesting that those cops should go after thieves instead works so well. So popular that a populist party managed to get a few roads changed from 120km/h to 130km/h maximum speed - and already there's people complaining about getting a speeding ticket for going 140km/h.
      ( note: Longest distance you can drive in NL is about 390km. By driving 86 instead of 80, you save 20 minutes. Presuming traffic, lights, intersections, etc. don't slow you down one bit and you take no breaks. Plus most highways are actually 120km/h and your savings are even lower. But you go you speeder, you. )

      Here's the rub, though: when's the last time you remember the police catching murderers, rapists, hit-and-run drivers, etc.?
      Chances are that you can't - that's not because the police is wholly incompetent, but because you're not nearly as likely to hear about it in the media.
      And when's the last time you've dealt with the police yourself outside of your speeding, parking, etc. ticket? Probably not anytime recent either.
      So your opinion of the police is rather easily tainted.

      I'm not saying they don't deserve criticism - they do, but sometimes they're just vilified for no well-thought-through reason.

    3. Re:Hardly a surprise... by djfreestyler · · Score: 1

      The Dutch police doesn't even enter an house when there are two of them and they literally hear someone get tortured to death. I'm not making this up; this actually happened. The officers in front of the house could hear screams and moans and did absolutely nothing.

      Yes because clearly, screams and moans can mean nothing other than someone being tortured to death. Here in Holland it is pretty reasonable not to assume the worst when you hear sounds like that, considering cases like those happen rarely enough. And would you honestly want the police to come knocking on your door whenever you're playing a movie just a little too loud?

      On the positive side. If you manage to speed a little on the Dutch highways (you know, reckless driving where you dare to drive 85 - 86 km/hr instead of the allowed 80 km/hr) then chances are very high that you will get a speeding ticket. That's where the Dutch police truly excels.

      So quite frankly, within this context this can hardly come as a surprise.

      That is not really the fault of the police though, but the fault of those who say to them "you need to have X amount of tickets otherwise you don't get a bonus." Since catching a real criminal doesn't bring in any money but rather costs money, someone decided it is a far better idea to have the police fine you for speeding rather than catching that drug dealer living downtown. Not that I am happy with that, I think the entire idea of a minimum amount of fines is ridiculous.

    4. Re:Hardly a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm an engineering consultant -- if I make a mistake, my customer won't go to me next time, they'll go to my competitor.

      If the polices makes a mistake, who do I go to next time? The Mafia?

    5. Re:Hardly a surprise... by ameen.ross · · Score: 1

      I once got arrested because my parked car was smoking when I tried to start it. The head gasket was apparently broken.

      --
      $(echo cm0gLXJmIC8= | base64 --decode)
    6. Re:Hardly a surprise... by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      What happened to this country that suddenly nationalist sentiments become so popular?

      Recession (both pre-official and official), xenophobic fears about Muslims, a generation growing up with certain nationalities that statistically are a greater source of problems (whether cause or effect is up for debate), fear of loss of identity, leading to parties like the PVV, which in turn go for a populist agenda.

      Poles, for example, have been singled out for a long time but most people just didn't really care.
      Example: truck drivers. Whereas Dutch truck drivers need all sorts of papers that cost thousands of their personal money to attain, the Polish ones do not. Thanks to EU directives, there's freedom of travel/commerce, so a lot of Polish drivers manage to land jobs here, and can bid lower because they don't have the loans to pay off.
      It's only after the popular weblog 'Nostyle' decided to single them out on a variety of issues, in addition to the debacle in Zeeland where a woman was illegally hiring Poles for farmwork (and mistreated them as well), that it became a national issue of political import.
      That in turn lead to the PVV's website where people can complain about Eastern Europeans. Only complain, you can't say anything nice of course (at least, it's not counted). You also can't complain about Americans or British or even other Dutch. Eastern Europeans are specifically singled out - but they did it wisely enough that it's not against any laws, neither Dutch nor on the EU level. So while the EU has officially asked the Dutch PM to renounce the website, the Dutch PM just shrugs it off and says the website is a matter for the PVV and not him. Whether a matter of principle of because he doesn't want to lose the PVV's support (the ruling parties have a minority and need the PVV vote to push items through a lot of the time) is also up for debate.

      This isn't something that only happens in NL, it's just more starkly present because NL used to be seen as being highly tolerant - and now a lot of that is disappearing (pot is slowly being made illegal, prostitution reduced, euthanasia is under fire and if some groups had their way then NL would be ratifying a 'personhood' law (see: Missouri) as well.).

      But you need but look at Denmark (wanting to re-instate border controls), France (wanting to curb influx of refugees), Italy (wanting to shield off their southern borders from refugees), Germany (long-standing struggle with Turkish people), Switzerland (ban on minarets) and so forth and so on to see that this is definitely not just an NL thing.
      ( Poland itself has a very strong anti-gay sentiment, despite relatively accepting policies, but that's not a xenophobic issue. )

      tl;dr: it's fear, fear of loss of identify, fear of the unknown future.

    7. Re:Hardly a surprise... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Dutch police make mistakes, just like everywhere else. And when a police officer makes a mistake that can have dire consequences.

      However in this case our police forces wanted to do something, they requested a search warrant. Actually doing something about a minor theft is rare enough that that in itself is almost worth a headline. However for some strange reasons they were not granted a search warrant which is bizarre.

      So, minor thefts are common, then? I wonder what constitutes "minor". I travel with high-end camera gear. Perhaps I should re-prioritizing my list of countries to visit...

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:Hardly a surprise... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      In the US if the police investigate a report of a possible burglary, find a man in the house who refuses to identify himself screaming incoherently about being racially profiled, and they arrest him for disorderly conduct, they may read on the news the next day that President Obama has called them stupid.

    9. Re:Hardly a surprise... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Interesting - issues like this come up between states in the US as well. I think the big difference is that state law doesn't have the level of variation that EU law has, and limited state sovereignty has been around for 200 years which of course is why there isn't as much variation.

      The EU nations are slowly becoming like US states - a step bigger than zoning boards, but not the sovereign entities that can do everything from mint money to wage war. With a structure like either the US or EU governments in many cases the only thing that local government can do is shoot itself in the foot, as with the driving regulations example. You see stuff like this right now with the internet sales tax controversy in the US, and states granting exemptions to taxes to businesses in general in exchange for building facilities.

      The big issue in the EU is that this is all new, and that leads to the fear you describe.

  7. Not Bias by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's not what this is about at all. The Netherlands is a country that takes its fundamental privacy-from-the-police assurances more seriously than the US does.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Not Bias by Elisanre · · Score: 1

      But police still managed to bust torrent-sites and that 15 year old anon..

  8. Funny... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...they seemed to think it was enough when the iPhone 4 prototype was stolen.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Funny... by lxs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No Dutch police thought that the iPhone theft was none of their business because that happened on an entirely different continent.

    2. Re:Funny... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Well, they're not like American police then. Little matters like geography or national sovereignty carry to weight with them.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Re:In the United States... by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    This also applies in Canada and the UK. Recovered my bicycle by intimidating everyone until I traced it to the person who stole it. Worked pretty well surprisingly.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  10. Re:In the United States... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And if I am sitting on the jury after you are through, you are going in for assault with a deadly weapon. The guy you beat will probably do less time.

    Despite what you read in comic books, vigilante justice is an oxymoron, tough guy,

  11. Re:If it was Government Property Stolen by jwijnands · · Score: 2

    No... not in the Netherlands.

  12. Re:What happens? by headLITE · · Score: 1

    He could file for trespassing at least (more if the door is not unlocked). But not for theft. And he would of course have to explain how the stolen iPad ended up in his house. So he probably wouldn't do it.

    It might be worth to try and just walk up to the door and knock, then offer the person a chance to give the device back without involving the police.

  13. Solution --- live where the sheriff is elected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    next election, loudly support his opponent, making un-recovered property / un-acted upon information a major plank.

    1. Re:Solution --- live where the sheriff is elected by Amouth · · Score: 1

      except it is the judge that issues the warrant..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  14. So do the dutch have a problem with vigilantism? by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    Because I know for damn sure if I was in the same situation I would go recover the stolen property myself.

  15. Re:In the United States... by Glarimore · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a great way to get the shit beaten out of you (unless it's one of your "friends" who stole the bike).

  16. This is why vigilantism will never completely die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As evil as it is, this is why vigilantism exists.

  17. Not Suprising, or even Negative by bv728 · · Score: 1

    All he has is a location his device was at, not who brought it there, or why it was brought there. He also only has his statement the device was there. Not a lot of evidence, all told.

  18. Re:If it was Government Property Stolen by fnj · · Score: 1

    Yeah, riiiiight.

  19. Mod parent up by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Come on, that comment was funny, definitely not flamebait. Someone here has no sense of irony.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by stms · · Score: 1

      Thanks, it was probably modded down becuase sarcasm doesn't translate well onto the Internet.

  20. LoJack is also under complete police control... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    unlike the "Find my iPad" type apps.

    The LoJack system only starts transmitting when the cops tell it to (perhaps whether or not the car has actually been reported stolen?).

    A system that the property owner can activate independently of the cops just makes work for the police, without the possibility of being able to be used by the cops to track you without your knowledge or consent.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  21. Re:In the United States... by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    If I lived in an area where people carried guns around while stealing *bicycles* ... well I would probably be in a different line of work, I doubt I'd be a slashdot reader or programmer; and those kinds of people wouldn't be stealing bicycles, they'd be stealing cars and mugging people. Also, mods, I wasn't trolling. To state as a fact how some people reclaim property is not trolling, grow up.

  22. Where do I go? by subreality · · Score: 2

    Somewhere between the growing totalitarian hell of the US and UK and the apparently overly-respectful approach of the Dutch... Somewhere, is there a sane country where I can live?

    1. Re:Where do I go? by rvw · · Score: 1

      Somewhere between the growing totalitarian hell of the US and UK and the apparently overly-respectful approach of the Dutch... Somewhere, is there a sane country where I can live?

      The speeding comment of the parent poster is in the same category as complaining about taxes etc. It's not that bad. The Netherlands is a crowded country, heavy traffic, and that means much regulation. That's part of our nature.

      The terrible mistakes the police makes occasionally are true, and that happens everywhere. There is much to improve, but all in all it's still good living here.

    2. Re:Where do I go? by TheRedSeven · · Score: 1
  23. Re:This is why vigilantism will never completely d by doston · · Score: 1

    As evil as it is, this is why vigilantism exists.

    That and because vigilantism incredibly cool, although I'm not sure the word vigilantism is cool...just vigilante. Clint Eastwood plays a fine vigilante. Men on film used to review vigilante films "A couple-a hot sweaty mens taking matters into their own hands and lookin' to each other for their strongth"

  24. Re:In the United States... by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    I thought the approach I mentioned and Zeromous vindicated was a perfectly normal masculine response to stolen property. Damn it's like I was the only person here to goto a public high school and to think defending myself and my property is normal.

  25. Re:Business as usual by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    My point is that most times dealing with stolen property doesn't NEED involve police. If you KNOW where your iPad is, what kind of person are you not to get it back yourself?

  26. Re:Business as usual by Entropius · · Score: 1

    We pay cops to do violence on our behalf -- under the premise that the controlled use of violence is a specialized trade and that we ought to leave it to folks who are good at it.

    The trouble comes when the cops are bad at their job -- what do we do then? Do it for them?

  27. I think you just hit on the crux of the problem! by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reality is, cops generally don't want citizens "interfering" in the law enforcement process,in any way, shape or form. That's why you regularly hear stories of individuals getting arrested for chasing down a criminal who broke into their home, etc. etc. The typical line? "Leave that work to the police!"

    Sure, they want you to call them and make the initial report (as long as they consider it something serious enough to be worthy of their time and energy -- which varies wildly by department and what they've got on their plate). But they don't want you to do any "detective work" for them.

    A friend of mine had his truck broken into, right in front of my house, some years back. They stoke his new Alpine stereo head-unit, his cellphone and his wallet, which he had under the seat. He called the cops and besides dusting for fingerprints on his truck's door, they didn't do much of anything but take an initial report.

    He got the idea to try calling his cellphone, and the thief actually answered the phone! He got the guy to agree to meet him in a public parking lot at a certain time, by promising him he'd pay him some cash just to get back his wallet with drivers' license and other info in it (and told him he could keep the stereo). He called the cops to tell them what he managed to arrange, and you know what their response was? They didn't have the time or resources to go out there and wait around for the thief to show up!

    After that, he realized he was able to log into his cellphone provider's website and get a detailed call log of everywhere the thief called using his phone. The guy had been using it to call girlfriends, buddies, etc. etc. The log was 3 or 4 pages long with local calls the guy was making! He printed that out and gave it to the cops. Guess what? They still couldn't manage to do anything with it!

    He wound up better off just claiming all the losses on his insurance and getting all new stuff .... but it just goes to show? Cops completely disregard any detective work done by anything other then their own people, even if it's really GOOD work that would make an arrest a piece of cake for them.

  28. Re:Business as usual by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    Demanding someone return property under the threat of violence is not itself violence. I don't need to rely on Big Brother to do every god damn thing for me.

  29. Re:Fuck The Dutch & Their Gedogen Too. by Zandamesh · · Score: 1

    Ad Hominem much?

    --
    Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
  30. sorry to interrupt this gun discussion by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Something I don't understand --

    > According to the prosecutors, a search warrant is 'a very heavy measure,' that should only be used when there is 'sufficient suspicion.' The theft report by the owner was viewed as 'no objective evidence' in the case."

    So, what *would* be considered objective evidence? Does a law enforcement offer actually have to witness a crime before the authorities will pursue it? So, for instance, I'm robbed on the street, but there's no objective evidence that it happened because the crime was not observed? How does that work in The Netherlands?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:sorry to interrupt this gun discussion by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Usually applications of that type have a time stamp associated with the GPS coordinates. So if the ipad is registering that as the location over several pings during a length of days, chances are it lives there.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  31. Search warrant? by SirDice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You don't need a search warrant to ring the bloody doorbell and ASK about the stolen property. But even that was too much bother. Funny though, the police had absolutely no problems breaking into my house simply because my downstairs neighbor told the police I was away for a week and my cats were left on their own. I actually was away for 2 days and my parents fed them.

  32. You'll be hearing from the Thought Police. by drainbramage · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Remember the mantra: USA == BAD.
    It makes things easier for so many people.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:You'll be hearing from the Thought Police. by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between USA == BAD and "hey, here's some other country that is doing better at something than we are, maybe we should take a closer look at what's going on so maybe we can improve our own situation."

      But it's tough to point that out to the USA #1! crowd. To them, any acknowledgment that we aren't the bestest at absolutely everything is an attack on the US itself.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    2. Re:You'll be hearing from the Thought Police. by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to call cherrypicking? Because the story started with a burglary.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:You'll be hearing from the Thought Police. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      What should we do, boot out the flood of people who come in from our border with a third world country? Generally your ilk condemn such measures (and I actually do as well, no way we're kicking out millions of illegals, it's impossible). Go back in time and tell our forefathers that slavery was a moral abomination that would create an institutionally poor segment of the population? Pesky physics precludes that.

    4. Re:You'll be hearing from the Thought Police. by jlar · · Score: 1

      No. But my post was in response to a post which stated that the higher burglary rate in the US is evidence that gun ownership does not decrease the burglary rate. And it gave the impression that gun ownership is the cause of this difference. My post was meant to broaden this discussion.

  33. Re:Fuck The Dutch & Their Gedogen Too. by PPH · · Score: 1

    I've taken the train from Amsterdam to Schiphol many time and never had a problem. I guess I just don't look like a victim.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Re:I think you just hit on the crux of the problem by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    Yet if you don't do that detective work the police won't do anything because an ipod isn't worth investigating.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  35. You're getting entirely out of hand! by drainbramage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone can use facts.
    Do some work like the others, just base your opinions on how goood they make you feel.
    Facts are for loser's and boring people.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  36. You have to be politically connected by bigmattana · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of this story:
    http://apple.slashdot.org/story/11/09/02/2027210/did-apple-impersonate-police-to-recover-the-lost-iphone-5

    The police assisted corporate security folks from Apple to search the house for their missing iphone. This guy had is house searched, even though he just found the phone laying there. But if you are the average Joe Schmoe and you actually got it stolen instead of left it at a bar like an idiot, then you are SOL.

    1. Re:You have to be politically connected by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      This guy had is house searched, even though he just found the phone laying there.

      Well, he didn't just find the phone. You don't get arrested for finding a phone. You can get arrested for picking it up and keeping it.

    2. Re:You have to be politically connected by bigmattana · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you can get arrested for finding something and keeping it, but this guy did not get arrested, he had is house searched with the police help. (Hence the relation to this story.) They did not even find the phone, so it is not clear if he did in fact find it and take it.

  37. Re:I think you just hit on the crux of the problem by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The thing is, all of that detective work is completely and utterly inadmissible in court. They need to do it, otherwise the chain of custody is broken and they can't prove it wasn't tampered.

    I honestly don't know why they can't use that as a reason to investigate (i.e. go search the guy's house), since they'd then have proof that he was in possession of stolen goods, but that first bit is their logic.

  38. It was the right thing to do by Hentes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having a tracking software on your device is means next to nothing, as there is no way you can prove the police that it really is your device and it really is there. The only thing they have is your word, or maybe isn't even that, because you don't have control over the device anymore: the thief could just as well submit fake data. If this was enough for a search there would be hundreds of ways to misuse it to cause harm to someone, and people here would cry fascism and police brutality. But when there is a shiny Apple device at stake, civil liberties doesn't seem to be that important all of a sudden.

    1. Re:It was the right thing to do by SirGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having a tracking software on your device is means next to nothing, as there is no way you can prove the police that it really is your device and it really is there. The only thing they have is your word, or maybe isn't even that, because you don't have control over the device anymore: the thief could just as well submit fake data. If this was enough for a search there would be hundreds of ways to misuse it to cause harm to someone, and people here would cry fascism and police brutality. But when there is a shiny Apple device at stake, civil liberties doesn't seem to be that important all of a sudden.

      I would think that he could get the paperwork showing the serial number of THAT device matches the deivce he purchased, Images of HIM/friends on the phone, etc.

      Sadly, this "too much" effort isn't just for things like this. A few years ago, I had someone illegally use my CC # and make charges. I got the money back but I also had contacted every company where an illegal purchase was made, and finally tracked one that could correlate my home addy to the theif's order. I got their Name, Address, phone, etc.

      When I filed the police report (per my Bank's orders), NOTHING happened. As far as I can tell, this person didn't get arrested and whatever had been shipped to him, he got to keep. (The only good thing was the companies he'd bought from flagged his name if he ordered again).

    2. Re:It was the right thing to do by Hentes · · Score: 1

      So how do they know the serial number of "THAT" device if it was stolen? It's easy to prove after they searched the address and found the device, but you can't know that the thief is really the one the owner claims without searching him.

    3. Re:It was the right thing to do by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Having a tracking software on your device is means next to nothing, as there is no way you can prove the police that it really is your device and it really is there. The only thing they have is your word,"

      Really? So it is not possible, the victim, to produce a receipt? To quote what the WiFi MAC address is, because one can show a past record of it connected to his/her access point?

      How about this- I actually save the boxes to my electronics. And it has the serial number on the box. Other people do that too. Is that not proof??? There are lots of possibilities that you are completely discounting.

    4. Re:It was the right thing to do by Hentes · · Score: 1

      The only thing these prove is that he had an iPad. That it has been stolen by a guy living in a certain address is just a claim.

    5. Re:It was the right thing to do by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"The only thing these prove is that he had an iPad. That it has been stolen by a guy living in a certain address is just a claim."

      In your original response you were being generic- essentially saying that in all cases, there is no way one can prove that it is your device. I agree that the software app in question can not prove ownership.

      However, that is just a tool to LOCATE the device. There are a number of ways one could prove to the police it belongs to the apparent victim, which I illustrated in my response.

    6. Re:It was the right thing to do by Hentes · · Score: 1

      But those ways only work after the device has been found. The article is about issuing a search warrant, which also requires some sort of proof.

  39. Re:I think you just hit on the crux of the problem by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

    There are cops and then there are cops. This reminds me of a coworker that received a phone call from the local police. It seems he had a bad break-up with his ex-girlfriend who called them and said he hacked her Facebook account.
    Listening to the other end of this conversation was fun.

    "Who is this?" Friend
    "mumble,muble" Cops
    "What the fuck? Really, I hacked her facebook account? I can't believe we are having this converstation. (Several profanities later) Goodbye" Friend

    Cops then called his parents, who called him and things went away after that.

  40. iPad apps aren't perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To put this in a slightly different context, raiding an address because of the location prodived by an app doesn't always work out:

    A LANDLORD says he is disgusted after police smashed down the door of his house looking for a burglar – after receiving information from an iPad app. The victim of the burglary had his iPhone stolen, but had software on his iPad that used satellite technology to trace his stolen phone. It pinpointed the phone to the house in Rufford Road, Sherwood. But when officers broke in they found no trace of it or the burglar.

    It then goes on to quote an academic as saying:

    "The apps' accuracy can be impressive. In an urban area the range is roughly 50m. But it cannot pinpoint an iPhone to a specific address in a built up neighbourhood.

    So yeah, just because apps are handy doesn't mean they'll always provide enough evidence to raid somewhere on.

    1. Re:iPad apps aren't perfect by Vernes · · Score: 1

      This is why you need more extensive apps.
      Track the location, send a signal when you are near. Phone turns camera on and sends it's current phonenumber to you.
      You call, you look, you start ringing doorbells.

  41. Re:Business as usual by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Oh, certainly. That's what I mean by "cops being bad at their jobs" -- and, besides, just because we pay the government to build roads for us doesn't mean that we shouldn't build our own roads, too, when the situation warrants it.

    My point was really that when the cops *are* bad at their jobs, we *have* to take their jobs back into our own hands, since we're the ones who gave them to the cops in the first place.

  42. Double standards for network tracking by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those playing at home: network tracking and identification isn't enough to even grant a search warrant for theft of physical property, but it's enough evidence to convict in a case of "theft" of intellectual property.

    Double standards much?

    1. Re:Double standards for network tracking by elbonia · · Score: 1

      You are mixing up the laws between countries. In the US you can get a search warrant for both. Only in Holland are the police and courts so lazy they dont want to do their jobs. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/03/BAL01NFOUT.DTL

    2. Re:Double standards for network tracking by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Nope, they prosecute IP violations based on network traffic in the Netherlands too. (Any Dutch readers, feel free to shoot me down here.)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirate_Bay#Netherlands

    3. Re:Double standards for network tracking by elbonia · · Score: 1

      I dont see anywhere in the wikipedia entry that mentions a warrant issued on users based on network traffic. The word warrant appears only once and it concerns actually seizing materials from the Pirate Bays offices.

    4. Re:Double standards for network tracking by xdroop · · Score: 1

      Don't be stupid. You very well know that that iPad is worth, at most, $1000, while a single downloaded song is worth easilly ten times that much.

      It is all about putting policing resources where they will generate the most revenue for the politicians^W^W^W^W^W^W^W do the most good.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    5. Re:Double standards for network tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what you do is make a midi arrangement, put it on your iOS devices, and claim he stole your device, which holds your latest arrangements of music that you are working on...

  43. Bummer for the iPad owner by koan · · Score: 1

    But nice to know that the police are not as invasive as they are in the US, unless of course they were just to busy at the donut shop to follow up on the iPad, or whatever passes for donuts in that part of the World (smoke and a pancake?)

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  44. Re:So do the dutch have a problem with vigilantism by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    It naturally depends on your financial situation, but to me it would be worth it. I'm not going to be a willing victim just because the police refuse to do their jobs.

  45. Re:I think you just hit on the crux of the problem by Whorhay · · Score: 2

    That's not entirely true. The phone records from his own cell phone account are fine, although the cops might have to request a copy themselves to be sure of their validity. And the person doing the detective work can testify about the things they found. Those things might not be able to be presented as evidence items themselves but they can still be testified about.

  46. Re:Gates definitely did something wrong by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Each side has their own version of events. When it comes to conflicting stories from a university professor and a cop, I'd take the word of the professor every time.

    Not that profs never lie. But I know cops lie regularly.

  47. Re:Gates definitely did something wrong by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think being abusive towards a police officer should get you arrested.

    You are among the majority of people who think that the police should have special privileges beyond the minimum needed for the performance of those among their duties which are just. I do not agree.

    Police officers are individuals. I've seen them be far more nasty than the situation required. I've seen them receive abuse without responding, that no person should have to endure. The fact that there aren't a whole lot more Darwin award recipients among those abusing policemen is a great commendation for the police in general.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  48. Yeah, and that doesn't happen in Holland by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    I am dutch, in Amsterdam the Bijlmer is a high-rise area that used to be thought of as the way of the future, relatively large high-rise apartments with lots of greenery, a subway and train station... it failed and became an area where... well there is no nice way to say it, the blacks live.

    Not to long ago during a police raid on an apartment some jumped down and died. The claim? The police should in future call ahead that they were going to come for a raid so that the criminals they had come to arrest wouldn't feel the need to jump down to flee... and people wonder why the majority in Holland is fed up with the bleeding heart approach of Job Cohen, a man under whose wise rule as mayor of Amsterdam saw racial tensions increase, race riots, the rise of the right, Muslims attacks on gays, the failure of costly new projects to try to house the layers of society together (IJburg where it was tried to get mixed incomes in the same apartment blocks). Also the guy managed to get mushrooms banned which are a drug with ZERO bad effects on society (no crime, no drug addicts, no health effects).

    Holland is smaller and you can't compare the Bijlmer with possibly Harlem of the past but what is ALSO lacking is things like the guardian angels where the locals cleared up their own mess.

    Holland tried one approach and failed at it. See the current "uproar" about the website for reporting trouble caused by polish people in Holland. This is scary as hell, especially in how the left reaction just fuels the growing hatred. Godwin be damned, but just as MS didn't win so much because it was so good but won because everyone else sucked even worse. Hitler didn't get to power because he was so brilliant, he got to power because the opposition was so ineffective.

    that is why the US has such though anti-drugs measures, because the pro-people are completely unable to form an effective opposition. See the distancing of medical drug users from the abusers. 4/20 is supposed to be a celebration of responsible recreational and medical drug users, not get high as a skunk day.

    The best way to loose your battle is to choose representatives that rub everyone else the wrong way. I am personally not that intrested in drugs one way or another, but talk to one doper for a minute and I start think that shooting all of them would not be a bad idea at all.

    See this very story, AND the other story about some idiot getting caught with weed. Cosh, I wonder how many who want the police to burst in on the evidence of an app, ALSO protest the police searching a car in which drugs were found on the evidence of a trained dog... Want to make me believe in your cause? Try to at least be consitent with in the same paragraph.

    Anyway, Holland is no paradise. The left forgot that a social society has to be supported by the middle class and thought that all the justification needed was "because we say so". Then the right marched in with scare stories and the left totally forgot how to win a debate with strong factual arguments. Every single debate between Wilders and Cohen was a bloodbath with Cohen totally unable to counter the rabid hatred of Wilders. I fear Hitler less then I fear the likes of Chamberlain.

    See the current Republican candidates in the US. They make Bush look sane, even reasonable. You would almost hope that it was a plot to ensure Obama wins the next elections by creating a opposing candidate nobody would vote for... but people are voting for these rabid loonies. This time, it is not even a clear win for the least loony.

    Prepare for a LOT more crazy stuff, both in Holland and the US. Good times are not coming.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  49. Re:I think you just hit on the crux of the problem by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Liked your phone calls list, that reminds me of the time someone stole my wife's personal info and set up a phone line under her name.

    A HOME phone line.

    They then racked up about $1,000 worth of calls from their residence in another state. Then I get the bill. Right... I don't live there, I live here... never been there. "No problem, obvious case of fraud, we cleared your bill".

    Great! No problem right? Then the cops won't investigate it. It was a landline! Not only that, the phone company sold their loss to a debt collection agency and they've been hounding me over it for 8 years now.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  50. Goldmember... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Dutch people have iPads now? Neat.

  51. Re:Gates definitely did something wrong by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    And you obviously don't know many profs.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  52. around here you do have to call the police by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I live in the Canadian prairies. Around here if you have a car accident you need to call the cops if anyone was injured or if the damage is above a certain dollar amount.

  53. Citizen arrest by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the might Dutch, but we can do Citizen arrests here in the fuckup land of the hyprocrits, i mean, the USA.

    Get your friends, go to where the iPad is, do your best to figure out exactly who has it, wait, when you can get them alone, preferbly with the ipad, then "arrest" the fool.

    Yes, I have a lot of spelling errors in this post, don't care.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  54. Re:In the United States... by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    Some of us nerds can handle ourselves. Especially if one has confidence to deal with those more threatening.

    The last time I was 'beat down' I was sucker punched for defeating a SF2 opponent with a throw. That's just how we rolled back then I guess.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  55. Re:In the United States... by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't have to be this way. We should be able to have the police catch those who steal property before they can steal MORE, not after the fact. Unfortunately police have not made securing the public a priority in recent times.

    The problem is talking to police these days in the US and Commonwealth can get an innocent guy in to a heap of trouble.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  56. Plan A: police is the new tech support by nazsco · · Score: 1

    note to self: treat police like you treat your ISP technical support.

    "hi, a guy robbed my expensive device and i followed him to his home, here's the address. I clearly saw him by the window using it. And yes, it's running windows XP and I did reboot just now."

  57. Same in Oz, this happened to me. by Minix · · Score: 1

    I had to resort to plastering the guy's block of units with the screen captured photo of the location, *and* deduce his employer's name, and send the address there with an explanation. Turns out the guy just 'found' it and was meaning to return it anyway. Uh-huh.

    So anyway, when the cops take the report, tell them (when they ask) that the ipad contains information which may be of use to terrorists. Your porn stash might give aid and comfort, right? At that point, I imagine, they will be bashing the door down to get it back.

    Finally, and most surprisingly ... Apple will happily continue to allow the thief to download new software (including, of course, reflashing the device) even if you inform them of the theft, and even if you accompany it with a police report of the theft ... why should Apple care, they're making money both sides of the deal, right? Apple 'support' 'explained' to me that it was technically impossible for them to refuse to allow a thief to make use of Apple's facilities to reflash the iPad into a valuable commodity. Apple 'support' admitted that there was a hard-wired serial number, that the iTunes crapware could read it, and that it could send it to the servers, but ... no ... technically impossible. It'd be a different story if someone were stealing something of theirs, I guess.

    Apple Scum.

    My next iPad will be a Samsung.

    --
    "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." Ed Howdershelt
  58. Re:Gates definitely did something wrong by Quila · · Score: 1

    You are among the majority of people who think that the police should have special privileges beyond the minimum needed for the performance of those among their duties which are just.

    Correcting someone's abusive behavior is within the minimum. Being abusive like that prevents the cop from doing his job, takes time he could use in police duties.

    The fact that there aren't a whole lot more Darwin award recipients among those abusing policemen is a great commendation for the police in general

    Gates should consider himself lucky. If he had encountered a cop who was actually racist as he accused this one, he might have been beaten or even shot.

  59. Dutch cops are utterly useless by davesag · · Score: 1

    In 2002 my home in Amsterdam was invaded by gun-wielding criminals who tied me up, blindfolded me, threatened me with torture and death and who stole almost everything of value from my house. When I eventually escaped to a nearby friend's house I called the cops who explained that I needed to go and report the incident in person at a police station rather than over the phone. So I went to the nearest police station and, after spending 20 minutes trying to get someone's attention, was told I'd come to the wrong police station and I need to walk down to another one. I did that and was told by those cops that I was still at the wrong police station for crimes in my area and I needed to go to the one closest to my home. I pretty much lost it at that point and the cops drove me to the right police station where I spent 6 hours filing a report that they then promptly lost.

    A few days later I went back to my home and found a hoodie that had been worn by one of the criminals. I took this down to the police station and they explained that

    1) the officer who took down my details had moved to another station,
    2) they had lost my report of the incident, and
    3) what did I want them to do with the hoodie anyway?

    Naturally they showed zero interest in catching any criminals, or indeed doing any work. Lazy and incompetent don't even begin to describe the dutch police.

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it