Slashdot Mirror


UK ISPs Ordered To Block Pirate Bay

Barence writes "Five of Britain's biggest ISPs have been ordered to block access to The Pirate Bay. Sky, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, O2 and Virgin Media have been told to block access to the site. Britain's biggest ISP, BT, has been given a few further weeks to 'consider its position.' Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else' and calling for those who use The Pirate Bay to illegally download content to 'explore the many digital music services operating ethically and legally in the UK.'"

188 comments

  1. how to unblock by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    who where what when now?
    1. Re:how to unblock by caknuckle · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-unblock-the-pirate-bay-111004/ nuff said?

      Since internet traffic itself is routed through the ISP's line's, are they sophisticated enough to block the IP ranges of the Pirate Bay, or would it be simple DNS blocking?

    2. Re:how to unblock by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      That's great if the block is limited to DNS...

    3. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If other European countries are anything to go on, it'll just be a DNS level "block". Which means I'm laughing, as I use Virgin Media but already use someone else's DNS resolvers.

    4. Re:how to unblock by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      It's blocked.
      Got another link to a non-torrent site?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:how to unblock by Spad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ISPs will very likely take the least-cost, least-effective method available to them under the terms of the court order so as to adhere to it with a minimum of disruption to their profits and their users.

    6. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? It's only blocking DNS?

      Wow - removing an objectionable business from the phone book does not make that business unreachable. Why on earth do people think it does?

      Dumb Dumb Dumb.

    7. Re:how to unblock by swilver · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's even easier.

      1) Install Opera.
      2) Activate "turbo mode".
      3) Browse as usual.

      Happy downloading.

    8. Re:how to unblock by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      there are others. I personally use kickass they have a nice interface.

    9. Re:how to unblock by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2

      India atleast implements IP level blocks

    10. Re:how to unblock by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      Genius. You wouldn't be able to connect to piratebay.org's torrent server but you could still use their website, download their torrent files, and connect to other people (seeds/peers).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    11. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. If big music is allowed to censor information just by flexing it's muscles, then this is a problem, no matter how ineffective the means of censorship.

    12. Re:how to unblock by horza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do they think implementing mass censorship on a national scale will affect piracy?

      The dumb starts on a much higher strata than the workings of DNS.

      Phillip.

    13. Re:how to unblock by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The distillation of it is to use Google's DNS, or some other public DNS system.

      Of course, the best answer if you are sensitive to this kind of thing is to run your own resolver, which isn't all that hard.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shush.

    15. Re:how to unblock by Roujo · · Score: 2

      Here you go, I put the article on PasteBin since it's CC-BY-NC-licensed. =)

      http://pastebin.com/mptMrYit

    16. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use Opera in turbo mode. Does a compress and resolve in the background. Fun!

    17. Re:how to unblock by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

      Indeed. We need a name for the situation in which a company does something beneficial not for any altruistic or ethical reasons, but simply because the most profitable path happens to be aligned with the interests of the users.

    18. Re:how to unblock by r1348 · · Score: 1

      ISPs here in Italy already block TPB since a year at least, but did it so sloppily that a simple DNS change works around it.

    19. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They haven't had a "torrent server" or tracker for quite a while anyway, so it'll make no difference at all.

    20. Re:how to unblock by cvtan · · Score: 2

      It took a whole minute for you to post this after the article showed up on /. Please try to be faster next time.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    21. Re:how to unblock by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      TFA says that Newzbin got around the block last year by moving domains, so I'm guessing it's a DNS block (assuming they do the same).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    22. Re:how to unblock by makomk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty much all the ISPs have a very effective content filter originally instated in the name of blocking child porn - it uses a transparent proxy to intercept and block requests at the HTTP level - and I think it's that specifically that they've been ordered to use to block The Pirate Bay. At the time, the ISPs and politicians behind this scheme insisted that it was only targetted at child porn and there wasn't any kind of slippery slope, whilst opponents pointed out that the courts could force them to block other kinds of sites once they had the infrastructure in place.

    23. Re:how to unblock by makomk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This probably won't work in the UK. All the major ISPs have some variant of BT's Cleanfeed censorship system - they were pressured into installing it in the name of stopping child porn - so they're almost certainly going to be blocking at the IP level. The entire point of this court case was to force ISPs to use their very effective existing censorship infrastructure to block sites like The Pirate Bay.

    24. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in the Netherlands we have and IP-level block for some ISPs (Ziggo, the biggest, and XS4ALL, the internet-friendliest). However, research has already shown that this has not reduced piracy through the pirate bay (oddly enough, you'd expect at least one or two people to move on to the next website when 'it doesn't work').

    25. Re:how to unblock by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      TBP doesn't tun the trackers any more, but even if they did, the rumor around here seems to be that Cleanfeed - the child-porn-blocking system - will be repurposed. Cleanfeed only filters http content on port 80.

    26. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enter SSL (HTTPS) and SSL certificates, the original way to deal with "transparent proxies" (which are, after all, automated man-in-the-middle attacks).

    27. Re:how to unblock by negRo_slim · · Score: 2

      Pretty much all the ISPs have a very effective content filter originally instated in the name of blocking child porn - it uses a transparent proxy to intercept and block requests at the HTTP level ...

      Source?

      I'm genuinely interested.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    28. Re:how to unblock by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That won't stop DNS functionality, from looking at this. You can use a proxy (or use SSL) to get around the cleanfeed - you just need to know where you are connecting first (and DNS does that job). Note that cleanfeed works by intercepting your request and examining the URL - well, that can only be done by reading an HTTP packet. Can't do that through SSL, or even by using an open proxy (since the "suspect" IP would not be used, and so wouldn't trigger this whole process).

      So: the lessons are! 1: Use your own resolver, if you can't trust a public one. 2: use SSL you damn idiots, stop letting data fly around cleartext! (this last one is a yell at the people hosting the sites, not you poor users)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    29. Re:how to unblock by gedeco · · Score: 1

      Tor

    30. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not supposed to know about that, citizen.

    31. Re:how to unblock by SilentChasm · · Score: 3, Informative
    32. Re:how to unblock by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      It's blocked. Got another link to a non-torrent site?

      https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
      install that and try again ;)

    33. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! My university (UoD) blocks all major torrent sites and it works with Turbo mode!

    34. Re:how to unblock by infolation · · Score: 1

      They moved to newzbin2, which is now also blocked in the UK. (Not that it's hard to circumvent.)

    35. Re:how to unblock by makomk · · Score: 1

      Is the correct answer. There's deliberately no official public description of the systems in question, so all the known details are based on leaked information and reverse engineering.

    36. Re:how to unblock by sjames · · Score: 2

      And THAT is why there was so much objection to implementing the system at all even though it was supposedly only going to block repugnant things like child porn.

    37. Re:how to unblock by makomk · · Score: 1

      They can and probably would just block all SSL access to the Pirate Bay's IP address. The fancy stuff with the transparent proxy is aimed at dealing with multiple sites on the same IP address and situations where they just need to block a single page within a site, neither of which applies here - you can't reliably have multiple SSL websites running on the same IP address.

    38. Re:how to unblock by makomk · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that some implementations of Cleanfeed by some ISPs have been found to incorrectly try and filter HTTP content on all ports, breaking any non-HTTP services on the same IP address.

    39. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe... I'm... missing something here...

      But what if they... block the static IP also?

    40. Re:how to unblock by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You can't?

      Your point about just blocking the IP does stand though. There's no good way around that aside from proxying out from the "tampered" network.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    41. Re:how to unblock by julesh · · Score: 1

      You can't?

      No, you can't. Somewhere in the region of 50% of deployed web browsers don't support SNI. Setting up a commercial site that relies on having SNI enabled browsers in order to work correctly would be suicide.

    42. Re:how to unblock by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Wait, since when were torrent sites commercial sites?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    43. Re:how to unblock by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We've done the DNS block thing in Belgium, which makes sense because it's a prefect example of the "belgian solution" which is where you basically do not modify the status quo in any meaningful way and everyone loses a little but can spin it as a win. In this case :
      - Government doesn't really block anything, but can claim to be making an effort.
      - Copyright organizations don't curb piracy, but get to claim they've blocked a major site.
      - ISP's have to waste time on BS DNS blocking, but can claim to be law-abiding good citizens.
      - Customers have to use workarounds, but can feel like they're outsmarting "the man."

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    44. Re:how to unblock by snakeplissken · · Score: 1

      Even if everyone moved to browsers supporting this having the domain name in the initial connection request now allows for easier blocking :(

    45. Re:how to unblock by cpghost · · Score: 1

      The Pirate Bay has already been blocked at the BGP level in the past, at least for a short time. That would be a much more fundamental attack than a mere IP block that is easily circumvented with proxies.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    46. Re:how to unblock by GrandCow · · Score: 2

      Isn't something like this immediately bypassed by things like TOR?

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    47. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but the Pirate Bay isn't a commercial site. Most people using it are on computers they control and can presumably install a sufficiently modern browser on (I see the main problem with SNI is our old enemy IE6).

    48. Re:how to unblock by Endovior · · Score: 1

      Fact of the matter is, it'd not just be best for the users and cheapest for the company to do that... more likely then not, it'd be the only legal thing the company could do. The laws regarding what an ISP can and cannot do with it's service are pretty thorny in most places... so a company that does more then the letter of the law requires, using the kind of aggressive monitoring system that might actually stop the standard workarounds, can open itself up to liability, If nothing else, privacy laws alone could get them in trouble. If the government specifically demands that they do a thing, they're covered... but monitoring specific details of a user's traffic just to see if they might possibly be trying to circumvent blocks will get them sued. Accordingly, any company with a competent legal staff will do exactly that minimum... because it's quite probably also the maximum. In this case, that which is not compulsory is forbidden.

    49. Re:how to unblock by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Look back to some articles a few years back on /. when they blocked a single page on Wikipedia.

    50. Re:how to unblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the web host changes IP addresses....

  2. This will work well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because, you know, TPB is the only torrent site on the Interwebs. People won't use other sites or find a work-around. Nope. Not at all.

    1. Re:This will work well by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can search google for filetype:torrent FFS.

      And TPB has legitimate purposes. I've watched several free movies like Pioneer One and The Yes Men Fix the World, as well as free music like Blalock's IRP, an album from an artist named Sosa that I've never heard of before, and all kinds of things.

      Don't get me wrong, that's a small minority of the links up there (since it doesn't host any files, duh) but it's not all links to pirated material.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:This will work well by green1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have had no success with google's filetype search at all recently. it used to work well, but any time I use "filetype" now it just seems to ignore it (of course it generally ignores most of the explicit instructions I give it anyway, so maybe that's just the new google...

    3. Re:This will work well by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>google for filetype:torrent FFS.

      "INDIAN GIRL BELINDA NOT A DESI AUNTY FFS - FREE Torrent"

      What on earth did you lead me too? :-o

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:This will work well by Elbart · · Score: 2

      Sshhh.

    5. Re:This will work well by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2

      The pornography pot of gold at the end of the internet.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    6. Re:This will work well by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

      And TPB has legitimate purposes. I've watched several free movies like Pioneer One and The Yes Men Fix the World, as well as free music like Blalock's IRP, an album from an artist named Sosa that I've never heard of before, and all kinds of things.

      Don't get me wrong, that's a small minority of the links up there (since it doesn't host any files, duh) but it's not all links to pirated material.

      True enough that TPB traffics partly in legitimate, public domain-type files. But that's not something I'd really advance in their defense, mostly because they themselves don't. File sharing sites since Napster have pulled that out when hit with litigation. "Maybe there's infringing content on our service; we can't say--it has legitimate uses, and we certainly don't encourage infringement (nudge, wink)."

      The Pirate Bay, to their credit or detriment, depending on your point of view, has always been up front about having (and encouraging) infringing content. For goodness' sake, they call themselves The Pirate Bay. I actually like their honesty in this regard--no pretense of doing anything other than facilitating infringement. It's essentially their whole platform, as I understand it.

      And you quite fairly acknowledge that legitimate content on their servers is in the minority. So c'mon--the dudes are pirates! Don't take that away from them.

    7. Re:This will work well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've watched several free movies like Pioneer One and The Yes Men Fix the World, as well as free music like Blalock's IRP, an album from an artist named Sosa that I've never heard of before, and all kinds of things.

      The content industries probably see that as just an added bonus.

  3. Once again, government is too slow to act. by Auroch · · Score: 2

    Yet again, we have another example of an inefficient government being too slow to act. Now, the question should be : Is it inefficent AND slow? Or just inefficient?

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    1. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It takes time for bribes to trickle down from polliticians to judges.

    2. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're quite efficient at being both inefficient and slow at the exact same time.

    3. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by Theophany · · Score: 1, Funny

      Neither. It's full-blown, mongoloid-butt-fuck retarded.

    4. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Because it would be MUCH better if government were to censor quickly and efficiently.

      <eyeroll />

    5. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      full-blown, mongoloid-butt-fuck retarded

      The nanny state exposed. It turns out that they really are a bunch of mongoloid butt fuckers.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    6. Re:Once again, government is too slow to act. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Unlikely as they probably cant find some else's ass with both hands, and if they can, they are impotent anyways so it just dangles at the entrance.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  4. Time for war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This should be fun!!!

    1. Re:Time for war by dadioflex · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've taken to hanging around HMV and tutting disapprovingly when I see anyone take a CD to the check-out. Don't they realise that money is going to fund a terrorist organization that seeks to censor the proletariat?

  5. wonder how this will affect smaller LLU's by s0litaire · · Score: 2

    I'm not with one of the "big 6" ISP's but I'm with an independent LLU that uses their cable.
    Will they be forced to block it as well?

    Not a big problem for me, as their is always a way around it!

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:wonder how this will affect smaller LLU's by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I'm with Be, who used to be an independent ISP but they got bought out by O2.

      Fuck. This country sucks.

    2. Re:wonder how this will affect smaller LLU's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a big problem for me either since I don't pirate content. However, this recent spate of "block this, censor that, seize this" still bothers me a lot as censorship is never a good thing.

  6. Well by Spad · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's piracy sorted, what's next?

    1. Re:Well by NeverSuchBefore · · Score: 2

      How about world hunger? Nah. That's too hard. Let's just hire more TSA employees to molest people at airports.

    2. Re:Well by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's piracy sorted, what's next?

      "The rest of the internet."

      Note the lack of sarcasm.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Well by Kenja · · Score: 2

      World hunger? Clearly you've not seen the new dollar menu at McFood.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pirates can be in porn too you humourless clod!

    5. Re:Well by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

      There will come a time, friend, when you will cringe upon looking back at this statement. Sometime in the near future we will see the Internet blocked and an unblocked address will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and only be available to corporations with very deep pockets. Right now we are on the cusp where individual sites are being blocked, but soon it will be more efficient simply to block everything and unblock "safe" sites.

      Then we will all be safe, citizen.

      Sleep tight.

      --
      Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    6. Re:Well by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, once we get to this point I don't think a lot of people will be on the internet anymore... We'll have invented something better and moved on to that.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately its like Chinese food, your hunger for more in 30 minutes. So all in all its a wash.

  7. BPI ethics by Anomalyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do the BPI members use the same Hollywood accounting methodology to pay their contracted artists, like charging "breakage" against digital music download sales? If so then the BPI concern over the artists getting paid is hypocritically laughable.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    1. Re:BPI ethics by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      Yeah, my first thought was that I'd find it hard to find ethical music suppliers in the UK - specifically the ones run by the labels.

      I guess the only places I'll by buying from now will be Magnatune and Bandcamp

    2. Re:BPI ethics by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is BPI part of this group?
      "Artists' lawsuit: major record labels are the real pirates" http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/12/artists-lawsuit-major-record-labels-are-the-real-pirates.ars

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  8. Lies. by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "explore the many digital music services operating ethically and legally in the UK.'"

    Yes, and you "can have any color of model T, as long as its black." Please. The popularity of the pirate bay suggests that the 'many digital music services' are woefully lacking in something the pirate bay provides; And study after study have shown that it's not the price that's driving people to those sites, but the ease of use and lack of DRM. People are, in fact, willing to pay to be entertained... they just don't believe that the pricing model accurately reflects the entertainment value of the product -- and when every song is priced the same at the various digitla music stores, that's pretty good evidence they're right; Nobody would say that Manos, Hands of Fate is of equal value to say, The Dark Knight. Well, nobody except the entertainment industry...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nobody would say that Manos, Hands of Fate is of equal value to say, The Dark Knight. Well, nobody except the entertainment industry...

      Late last year, somebody found an original 16mm Ektachrome workprint of Manos, and Manos: The Restoration raised $48000 - well over the $10000 goal.

      Sometimes the only way to preserve the long tail is to bypass the industry entirely. It's not worth it for the entertainment industry to resurrect Manos, but it is worth it to people who watch movies.

    2. Re:Lies. by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Well, to be fair, if you're drunk and/or high enough, those two are pretty much equal in value, which completely explains the entertainment industry's position.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  9. Agreed by alanthenerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'

    I agree. It's just unfortunate that when you buy mainstream music only a very tiny percentage goes to the music creators. Most of it goes to record label fat cats and towards lobbying for shit like this ban.

    1. Re:Agreed by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It certainly would be nice for some of these billion dollar infringement judgements to go to the music creators. But they probably stood to lose a few dollars. (assuming they ever got out of the hole with the record label they signed on with) Shows just how screwed up the economics of this issue is, on both ends of the line.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Agreed by KingCarrot · · Score: 1

      Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'

      I agree. It's just unfortunate that when you buy mainstream music only a very tiny percentage goes to the music creators. Most of it goes to record label fat cats and towards lobbying for shit like this ban.

      What's the problem? You are supporting the creative (book keeping) arts! Not only that, the "current" market is a win-win situation for the record labels...They get twice what they are worth and they are happy.

    3. Re:Agreed by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's an interview where a band told people NOT to bu their CDs, because they get nothing out of such sales. Instead they ask their fans to acquire their music through the net (torrent), and to support them through concert sales.

      Band tells fans not to buy CDs from dishonest label (2nd half of vid) - http://on.rt.com/ekn2z6

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can I get the torrent link for that?

  10. Goodbye internet by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    It was nice knowing the internet. Now the wicked people have figured out how to pervert it we can kiss it goodbye.

    What we need is a new internet free from political manipulations. Something mesh based and truely free would be nice.

    1. Re:Goodbye internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We built a garden..

      Long story but the moral is that we should not have let them in our garden. Time to build a new garden.

    2. Re:Goodbye internet by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone had good luck with darknets? I tried Freenet but it was too slow and didn't have very much on it.

      It very much resembles the internet of the 90s.

    3. Re:Goodbye internet by tqk · · Score: 1

      It was nice knowing the internet. Now the wicked people have figured out how to pervert it we can kiss it goodbye.

      Internet: "Rumors of my demise have been greatly exagerated."

      Think "whack-a-mole", and maybe you ought to read Fahrenheit 451. All the MafiAA are succeeding in doing is driving the pirates further out of their reach. Even unsophisticated users know they can get onto web forums and search engines to find answers to boneheaded moves like this.

      Politicians get campaign financing, artists learn to publish and promote their own works independent of the labels, the law gets even more screwed up than it already is, and fans learn that doing things the MafiAA's way is frustrating and not worth paying for. Way to go, MafiAA. :-P

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Goodbye internet by green1 · · Score: 1

      I tried freenet, and my impression was the same as yours. The basic problem is that there aren't enough people on it to make it fast and full of content, but nobody will be on it until it is...
      I also thought about TOR, but I don't like the idea that someone else pops out of the TOR network on to the public internet through my connection. It leaves me liable for their dirty deeds (I'd love to think that the simple fact that you can't know who it is would help, but I know that law enforcement would at the bare minimum make my life a royal pain for a very long time, even if that argument did eventually win (something I'm not 100% certain of))

      The sad truth though is that as long as data travels on big corporate pipes, we are vulnerable to this. The only real solution is a true mesh network built from the ground up to be anonymous and secure. Unfortunately, developing this and marketing it on a wide enough scale to be useful isn't a profitable venture (economically, socially, or politically), and as such there isn't likely to be such a thing in the near future.

    5. Re:Goodbye internet by cjb658 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't have to run a Tor relay/exit. In fact, it's off by default.

    6. Re:Goodbye internet by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But if not enough people run the exits, it becomes unuseably slow. Espicially if it's being used for p2p. That'll kill the network with ease.

    7. Re:Goodbye internet by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's not changed much. You can get a few good things piratewise (Someone uploads all the FiM episodes), but compared to any more mainstream network the library is pathetic. It's a place for the paranoid.

      I like the idea of a mesh network, but you see the problem. There isn't much demand for such a thing because the existing internet already does the job very well. Even pirates have no problems hideing things. Unless you're an activist in a politically oppressive regime (A very small population) there just isn't any call for such a thing. Even if the technology were perfected (I think it'd have to be content-addressable, but it's doable) there wouldn't be enough potential users to achieve the critical node density for it to work. What we have is Good Enough.

    8. Re:Goodbye internet by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I would absolutely run a Tor exit node. The problem is that some pervert will use it to download CP or something equally illegal to view in the UK, and I'll end up on the Register and ostracised from society for nothing more than wanting to help maintain the free speech of the oppressed.

      A relay is nothing to worry about, though; All nodes are relays, AFAIK. If it stays within the network, it's untraceable (unless you do something stupid like send your personal details to a Tor site).

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Goodbye internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exits block p2p/torrents by default

  11. Yeah well I don't give a fuck about music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how about you stick your crappy attempt at censorship up your ass?

    Enjoy making even more people flock to the site despite your stupid blocks. Morons.

  12. China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blocking sites? seems a little familiar, what's next?

    1. Re:China? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Blocking sites? seems a little familiar, what's next?

      The Spanish Inquisition!

      Nobody expects to see the Spanish Inquisition.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  13. ISP Followup Story by edgypx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everything Everywhere changes name to Most Things Almost Everywhere

    1. Re:ISP Followup Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISP formerly known as "Talk Talk" now renamed to "...Talk. (but watch it, buddy)"

    2. Re:ISP Followup Story by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      Australian ISP BigPond changes name to SmallPuddle ...

  14. Everything Everywhere, except ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever we say you can't have

  15. Crushing the Competition by stewsters · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every single artist on the promo bay should sue the monopoly for anti competitive business practices.

  16. We'll cure cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  17. Streisand effect by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    I would love to see a big fat Streisand effect from this.

    1. Re:Streisand effect by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      This is TBP. It's already benefited from everything the Streisand Effect can do.

  18. Boiling Frog by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    It's going to be interesting to see how people react to the slowly encroaching restriction on what we can/cannot access online.

    With the Middle East & Co. the cut-off was drastic, whereas I think in the West we're facing the Boiling Frog syndrome.

    People in this thread are asking if the governments' are slow/inefficient, but really I think the general populace is even slower.

  19. When?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will this supposed block be put in place? I have RTFA and can see no timescale or date which makes me assume this block is already in place.

    I am on one of the main 5 and have absolutely no problem accessing the site.

  20. They do not understand... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They think they are punishing TPB by blocking it, and that other torrent sites will be afraid because of the example they make of TPB. It is the sort of thinking that comes from politicians who grew up in a pre-Internet age.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:They do not understand... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to us ex-users of things like library.nu, as it WAS effective. It does scare of some, as they don't want the hassle/cost of this fight.

      But the net result is that the next batch will be even harder to stop as people go back underground.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. UK government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a British citizen I am getting more and more sick of the incompetent morons who govern this country.

    Maybe instead of takings bribes from the likes of Rupert Murdoch, outmoded business like the recording industry and the fundamentally failed banking sector they could do some of the following:
    - Financial transaction taxes. Stop the crazy gambling in the financial sector
    - How about cutting fuel taxes (paid for by a 1% increase in corporation tax.) Everyone needs stuff moved around so making it cheaper can only be a good thing.
    - Invest in actual industry rather than bailing out the failed financial sector. You've spent hundreds of billions on this and have nothing to show for it.
    - Build fucking nuclear power stations. Solar, wind, wave, etc are completely impractical so stop wasting money on them
    - Stop wasting money on wars
    - Open up the government and stop fucking with your people

    I'm not even sure who is worth voting for anymore. The Conservatives are as corrupt and sleazy as they were under Thatcher, Labour offer nothing more than "we wouldn't do what the Conservatives are doing but we won't bother to offer any ideas of our own" and the Liberal Democrats have sold themselves out to the Conservatives. Not one of these parties is willing to take any risks or do anything that requires telling the banking sector "NO!" The political class in the UK is completely rotten.

    1. Re:UK government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most of them were British. Meanwhile, the rest of us keep having to fork over more and more tax to support them and get nothing in return. That's why I'm going back to Australia as soon as my (British) wife finishes her PhD.

    2. Re:UK government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could move out to the colonies, petrol out here is cheaper!

    3. Re:UK government by darthdavid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least you don't live in the US...

    4. Re:UK government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you stand for office yourself?

    5. Re:UK government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another British citizen I too am not happy with measures such as this; whilst I have no interest in illegally downloading music or films I would take great pleasure in seeing the incumbent powers in both of those industries going to hell.

      I disagree with your proposals though and almost always favour less government rather than more:

      > Financial transaction taxes. Stop the crazy gambling in the financial sector
      Wouldn't stop the 'crazy gambling', it would just be that the government takes a cut, resulting in poorer returns for people with savings and pensions, higher interest rates for those with mortgages etc.

      > How about cutting fuel taxes (paid for by a 1% increase in corporation tax.) Everyone needs stuff moved around so making it cheaper can only be a good thing.
      I agree that fuel taxes are too high (except on Diesel, which is evil shit and should be taxed into oblivion) but large companies already move profits and revenue to avoid corporation tax (e.g. Amazon paying 0% in the UK, Ikea less than 4% globally (I wouldn't be surprised if that too were close to 0% in the UK), etc.) so it probably wouldn't raise much but would hurt smaller, UK only companies.

      > Invest in actual industry rather than bailing out the failed financial sector. You've spent hundreds of billions on this and have nothing to show for it.
      The bailout was badly managed but largely necessary IMO. Investing in industry is a laudable aim though easier said than done.

      > Build fucking nuclear power stations. Solar, wind, wave, etc are completely impractical so stop wasting money on them
      Investing in the right kind of nuclear power stations is a good idea but some alternative sources are worthy of continued investment.

      > Stop wasting money on wars
      I'd agree with that, we've been embroiled in some pointless wars from which no one seems to benefit.

      > Open up the government and stop fucking with your people
      Not sure where you're after with this one?

      Theoretically the Conservatives are the party of individual freedom, but they seem to have forgotten that.

  22. "deserve to be paid for their work" by syntheticmemory · · Score: 1

    Creative music artists are at the mercy of the record companies..... The music industry would like to continue the cash stream, but actually paying the artists for their work is another matter.

    1. Re:"deserve to be paid for their work" by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      NO they are not. People CHOOSE to work with the record companies for fame and fortune, not for the sake of art.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:"deserve to be paid for their work" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NO they are not. People CHOOSE to work with the record companies for fame and fortune, not for the sake of art.

      The radio stations have contracts that prohibit them to play music not originated from MAFIAA. Now this is what's wrong with your statement:

      choice /CHois/

      Noun:

      An act of selecting or making a decision when faced with two or more possibilities.

    3. Re:"deserve to be paid for their work" by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Radio is just a promotion venue like any other, not the standard by which one decides if they are an artist or not.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:"deserve to be paid for their work" by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      The radio ? Seriously ? Artists need to stop living in the 1960's.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  23. Okay, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    so there are other options to get the illegal stuff on The Pirate Bay... but what about the stuff that is on there legally, where TPB is the only place to get it?

    1. Re:Okay, by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Such as..?

      Honest question.

    2. Re:Okay, by danomac · · Score: 1

      Pioneer One comes to mind. And what about indie artists using TPB to distribute their music?

      If anything that could be considered anticompetitive behaviour.

  24. Cannot block an idea by troll+-1 · · Score: 1

    You cannot block the piratebay because it's an idea. You can take away its domain and block its IP addresses but those are things that can be changed. The piratebay will live on because it's an idea. It cannot be suppressed by the authorities. It will always resurface.

    1. Re:Cannot block an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait, if it's an idea, it's somebody's intellectual property. They should be monetizing it properly; that's the only legitimate use of an idea!

    2. Re:Cannot block an idea by sohmc · · Score: 1

      I understand the premise, but isn't entirely accurate. People love the Big Mac, but getting the Big Mac would be difficult if the government shut down McDonald's all of the sudden.

      But to help your point, TPB will live on. Just as another name. Until the ease of use of legitimate digital files is greater than the ease of pirating, the TPB and other services will live on.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    3. Re:Cannot block an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Big Mac is the physical manifestation of an idea - the burger in a bun.

      Shutting down McDonalds would not restrict access to burgers in a bun.

  25. I propose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    capitalism

    1. Re:I propose by sjames · · Score: 1

      So dumb luck?

    2. Re:I propose by I_Voter · · Score: 2

      Re:capitalism

      If you input the word capitalism into Google's Ngram viewer
      http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=5&smoothing=3
      the word becomes popular around 1880, and about 10 or 15 years earlier in Britain. This agrees with what I have read. I have read, many years ago, that the origin of the word was undetermined, but that it was almost certainly popularized by Karl Marx.

      The only reason I mention this is that Marx defined Capitalism, as control of the state by capital/Capitalists. I would prefer the term competition over capitalism. Capitalism is a poorly defined word, while competition is familiar to anyone that understands a market.

  26. New donate site for your favorite artists by onebeaumond · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you'll never see this. Because it's illegal for artists to be paid for their work, if Sony et all can't get their 90% "cut".

  27. I actually agree with the BPI by alexo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'

    "Just like everyone else" means "once".

    1. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      For clarity, is "once" more than the usual "never"?

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    2. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I make websites for a living. I don't get paid for every fucking visit the website gets.

      The entertainment industry (from A to Z) has it so easy that they've lost sight of reality.

    3. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by alexo · · Score: 1

      For clarity, is "once" more than the usual "never"?

      For clarity, please provide supporting evidence for your assertion that music creators are usually never paid for their work (using commonly accepted definitions of "usual", "never" and "work").

    4. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the entire history of humanity? Most music creators who have ever lived were not paid, nor credited for their work. We probably haven't hear a fraction of a percent of the amount of music people have created over the course of human existence. This century is fucked.

    5. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by alexo · · Score: 1

      How about the entire history of humanity? Most music creators who have ever lived were not paid, nor credited for their work. We probably haven't hear a fraction of a percent of the amount of music people have created over the course of human existence. This century is fucked.

      Do not confuse "work" with "hobby".
      I don't get paid for my hobbies either.

    6. Re:I actually agree with the BPI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which means you have to pay them as well you parasitic fuck. You want some enjoyment from their work. Fucking pay them you fucking cunt.

  28. Most People download to sample before buying by kawabago · · Score: 1

    If Britain blocks TPB legitimate sales will drop off because people won't be able to find music they want to buy.

    1. Re:Most People download to sample before buying by Richard_at_work · · Score: 0

      How did it work before the internet then? Sure, there was piracy, but not on the scale we see it today - and music was still bought.

    2. Re:Most People download to sample before buying by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Heard it on the radio, heard it at a friend's house, heard it in a friend's car. That kind of thing. People have been pirating cassettes ever since they came out... or don't you remember the days of waiting for your favourite song to come on the radio so you could start hitting 'record' on your cassette player?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    3. Re:Most People download to sample before buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happened in France. The recent 3 strikes law, or whatever, caused the metrics to measuring piracy to drop. The funny thing is it about corresponds with nearly identical drop in media(BR/DVD/Audio/etc) revenue.

    4. Re:Most People download to sample before buying by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      There once was a time where you had good radioshows. Hell, there even was a time MTV actually stood for Music TeleVision.
      However, the rise of 'payola' meant a decline in musical diversity on the radio's and even on MTV.

      At this point, the cassette trading with friends got really popular, people would give eachother cassettes to listen to(and copy).
      Later on, came the internet radio's that catered to specific publics that allowed people to yet again discover new music from smaller artists.

      Fast forward to today: A lot of internet radio's have been killed and the few remaining ones are eighter access restricted (pandora is US only) or only available through subscriptions (last.fm & consorts). I happen to be a last.fm user and I live in Europe. This service is only available to me for a monthly fee, won't run on mobile devices (apperantly, the labels have seperate licences for internet access on a PC and on a 'mobile device', go figure) and still restricts various artists music from playing in several regions.

      I still buy CD's, mostly from smaller artists, but were it not for the internet and piracy, I'd have less then 1/10th of the amount of CD's & albums I have now.

  29. Once upon a time... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Indeed. We need a name for the situation in which a company does something beneficial not for any altruistic or ethical reasons, but simply because the most profitable path happens to be aligned with the interests of the users.

    Once upon a time, that was called "doing business".

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  30. And now that the UK has censorship infrasctructure by rastoboy29 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It will now be easier to justify/implement blocking other unapproved sites.

    The main problem with doing this for piracy is that so many people do it.  They are fighting a large proportion of all people.

    Censorship should be limited to only the most egregious things, if that, or it WILL be expanded.

  31. Re:This will work well, NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm in the Netherlands and my ISP has TPB blocked here by court order, by DNS as well as its specific IP.

    It does NOT help. A university study showed no significant decrease in TPB use amongst my peer ISP users and I can confirm it for myself: I still use it without any problems :)

    In fact: the number of proxies, either specific to TPB or generic, has exploded due to the court order.

    Internet cannot be suppressed. It always routes around blockages.

  32. sooo... by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    When is the UK going to force blocking of Google, Bing, etc? Did any of these brilliant censors ever think to search for torrents there?

  33. Oh! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Oh, no! My right to download gigabytes of awesome music I would never actually pay for so they aren't actually losing money is being impinged!"

    I await my downmod with mathematical certitude.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Oh, no! I'm being called out for my straw man!"

    2. Re:Oh! by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      "Oh no, I can't reply to actual arguments, so I'll just make stupid strawmen and pray I won't actually be called out on them" If you're seriously getting on your high horse after making a quote like that, you're really asking for it. There is nothing intelligent about making it, or acting like you will be wrongly downmodded for it.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    3. Re:Oh! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Real fans still buy albums & cd's. Those you mention will just find another source.

    4. Re:Oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh no, I got another summer sausage stuck in my ass, God I love to stick sausage in my ass!"

  34. Reminds me of a few years ago... by bbbaldie · · Score: 1
    ...the American MAFIAA managed to get credit card access cut off to allofmp3.com. Bullied the credit card companies pretty badly, as I recall.

    The identical music was available on another half-dozen or so Russian websites (not specifically demanded to be blocked, therefore credit card companies had no problem doing business with them and making money) within a day.

    :-D

  35. Ruling not valid in Scotland and Northern Ireland? by TAZ6416 · · Score: 2

    Posted this on the Guardian site but no reply so thought I'd ask here. As far as I know this ruling is only applicable in England and Wales as Scotland and Northern Ireland, while part of the UK has their own legal system. So therefore the block should not apply to customers in Scotland and Northern Ireland? I'm sure it would be easier for the ISPs to attempt a blanket block for a technical point of view but if so could their Scottish and Northern Irish customers have grounds to complain?

  36. Erm... Not quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's still the matter of traditional pirates (the raping and pillaging kind). They're still attacking ships and disrupting trade off the coast of Africa and yes, the Caribbean.

  37. Re:Ruling not valid in Scotland and Northern Irela by Epimer · · Score: 1

    Acts of the United Kingdom Parliament can apply to Scotland and Northern Ireland too. Neither Scotland nor Northern Ireland have their own copyright laws; it's all the Copyright and Designs Act 1988.

    So, no.

  38. Re:Ruling not valid in Scotland and Northern Irela by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

    Thanks Epimer, I assumed this was a private civil case where the Copyright and Designs Act wasn't involved but happy to stand corrected.

  39. Re:And now that the UK has censorship infrasctruct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They already had it.. It was supposed to be limited to the most egregious things, it was expanded, and it WILL be expanded.

  40. Liars and hypocrites. by elashish14 · · Score: 2

    Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'

    Then maybe there should be some laws against the record labels which don't even pay the artists shit?

    and calling for those who use The Pirate Bay to illegally download content to 'explore the many digital music services operating ethically and legally in the UK.'"

    I invite those slimy pigs to make a legal and ethical living themselves.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  41. pff. Lobby on this.... by Mindscrew · · Score: 1

    Music lobby group, the BPI, welcomed the move, saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'

    Then maybe they should actually pay the artists for their work.....and im not talking about the measly 3% or whatever artists get for creating a song... i wouldnt be suprised if the artist (not label) actually make MORE money in the long run because of TPB then what the labels will pay.......because "they deserve to get paid like everyone else"...

  42. It's a modest proposal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody's been drinking the Friedman kool-aide.

    Murder, Inc. is a capitalist enterprise, you dig?

  43. The Internet was designed to survive a nuclear war by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    These court ordered blockades are simply seen by the network as damage that the network was designed to be able to work around. If Paul Baran hadn't spearheaded this effort at RAND the original AT&T would most likely still own America with its central office.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  44. The real question is.... by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    .... why the hell should it? Let's just compare Linux to the closest thing there is to it on the Consumer space: OS X. OS X, like Linux shares a lot of DNA with UNIX. But who would imagine giving a UNIX computer to their mother, their grandmother, their tech-challenged brother. The people who think that Linux should be taking the world by storm I notice are all gear-heads with presumably a fair high level of technical competence. And that's the problem. Does anyone in their right mind think that any distro of Linux is even close to the ease of use of OS X and OS X applications? Linux advocates seem to forget that desktop computing isn't the sole province of the University computer nerds, and hasn't been for decades.

  45. GOOD LUCK! by Bigsquid.1776 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that wigheads...

  46. magnets suck by Muramas95 · · Score: 0

    I really don't understand why everyone is painting such a big target on TPB still, I stopped using them as soon as they removed torrents and went magnet links only.

  47. What about when the artist is ok with TPB? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    Daily, I see TPB's main page has some artist promoting his work on TPB, and distributing their own work using TPB.

    I guess big media corps will be glad to silence those artists, but truth is, killing TPB really *does* kill those artists who actually get attention by being there and distributing their music there!

    So while the BPI says that artists deserve to get paid for what they do, they really just mean artists that work with them; the rest can be left to rot in silence.

    1. Re:What about when the artist is ok with TPB? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I would think the artist would figure out a different location to host his work.

    2. Re:What about when the artist is ok with TPB? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Really? Free means of distribution and advertising to so many people?
      Maybe, but still, even if they *can* find some other means, BPI still clearly doesn't care at all about killing of those aritists, or making life harder for them.
      They're just trying to protect a dying business model. Artists don't need those companies any more, like so many are proving day to day, growing out of nowhere by themselves.

  48. Might i add.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    A big F-U to the entire system.

    Not that it effects me directly, but lets not go down the path where we end up ' and no one was left to speak out for me;'

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. Re:The Internet was designed to survive a nuclear by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Eh? The original AT&T was forbidden from entering the computer business as part of it's regulatory restrictions in exchange for having a monopoly on voice telecom. It was doomed anyway.

  51. Slippery slope by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The slippery slope is real.

    Keeping a child rapist from moving next to a school to victimize the children seems like both a noble goal and easy to implement and with only good consequences. (*)

    Only now you've empowered government to decide where you can live. Where you live is a revokable privilege, not a right.

    That will only be used against those monsters, right? right? Good people have NOTHING to worry about.

    WRONG.

    Las Vegas bans even misdemeanor drug offenders from even entering a major portion of the city.

    Google "order out corridor". OOPS!

    Precedents are a dangerous thing.

    Creating infrastructure is a dangerous thing too.

    Onstar can be used by the government to listen to your conversations and even to disable your car, by making it think it is stolen - it will refuse to start.

    (*) Life without parole for the real monsters would eliminate the need for this stuff AND protect the children!
    Or a 38 cent bullet.

      But they don't want to protect the children, they want to control society with an iron fist. Letting molestors out of prison makes people fearful and then they pass these laws, and get precedents, and eventually you have weed heads being banned from huge parts of the city (ironically the Las Vegas order out corridor is so big - drug offenders are more restricted than molestors! Then again, molestation makes the politicans stronger, and drugs reduce their power.)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  52. That's a good move after all by cpghost · · Score: 2
    It has been said that adversity breeds tougher organisms. The same holds true for TPB, because the whole concept of a centralized index for BitTorrent was already a step backwards compared to e2dk-like searches. Even with the Pirate Bay moving to magnet links, it was still a centralized index. So it was only a matter of time until the powers that be would choke that single point of failure to death. Expect the same to happen to all those cyberlocker sites: there ain't so many of them after all, and the MAFIAA can and eventually will fight them tooth and nail until they fold.

    The more pressure is being put on those highly visible sites, the sooner truly distributed anonymous censorship-resistant and highly resilient p2p systems would not only emerge, but gain widespread adoption. And the more legitimate mainstream sites start appearing on those p2p networks as well, the more those networks will become indispensable and necessary part of everybody's infrastructure. THEN, and only then, governments won't be able to outlaw anon p2p, and we will have won this war, against all odds and against formidable opponents with seemingly unlimited resources. That would be the victory of the free human spirit.

    Or, to put in another way: we've grown too lazy by sticking to existing, but highly vulnerable file sharing mechanisms. Only effective pressure from the MAFIAA will help us move forward towards next generation better and more robust architectures. Maybe these Copyright Taliban are doing us a favor, by forcing us to develop and migrate towards a communication system that will be truly uncensorable and that will be our main channel for free speech in the not so distant future.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  53. deserve to be paid for their work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "saying music creators 'deserve to be paid for their work just like everyone else'"

    Except, last I heard, we have no right to a job and that our job could be outsourced or just closed and we have no right to deserve employment. Besides, they HAVE gotten paid (or at least the ones on salary who are the only ones who "deserve" to be paid: the artist is gambling on getting paid). And the artist doesn't get paid because the label ensure this is so.

  54. Any proof on that power supply thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or was that just dogma?

  55. They also CHOOSE to not get paid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they could, like the session recording artists, CHOOSE to get paid as a work for hire and then cede all rights to the corporation that hired them.

  56. Piratebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means that vpn is the only solution. I start using superb vpn and so far experience has been great...No problem with accessing site and torrent downloading....

  57. Way around block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys the easiest way around it would be going to http://www.theslyratebay.com/ . Requiers no proxies or vpns or any other crap like that.

  58. Re:Ruling not valid in Scotland and Northern Irela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should not apply to Scotland. Although the legislation is UK wide, in order for the ISPs to be forced to block this in Scotland an interdict would have to be issued by a Scottish court (an injunction in England). One has not been issued, therefore it does not apply.

  59. how to bypass the block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite what is being said everywhere, you cant access the pirate bay using a proxy server because the magnet links don't work through a proxy. Use www.piratebayuk.co.uk it runs its own custom built proxy server, which is currently the ONLY one that can handle the magnet links