Slashdot Mirror


DVDs, Blu-Rays To Show 20-Second Unskippable Govt. Warnings

bonch writes "DVDs and Blu-Rays will begin displaying two unskippable anti-piracy screens, each 10 seconds long, shown back-to-back. Six studios have agreed to begin using the new notices. Of course, pirated versions won't contain these 20-second notices; however, an ICE spokesman says the intent isn't to deter piracy but to educate the public."

398 of 587 comments (clear)

  1. Educate the public? by rk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To do what? Download the pirated copies so they don't have to watch the unskippable content?

    1. Re:Educate the public? by Technician · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or use a DVD player that is not blessed by the DVD consortium.

      Is it so hard to make a DVD player that plays the movie when you put it in?

      A No it is not hard, just not allowed.

      http://www.geexbox.org/ Play your movie. The menu and extras can be viewed if desired.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Educate the public? by RandomAdam · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    3. Re:Educate the public? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly correct. The two 10-second pieces of unskippable "educational" content will serve only to annoy those people who legally purchased the DVD and Bluray discs. Those who acquire illegal copies will not be subject to such annoyances.

      .
      That sounds like a good plan to me if the goal is to push paying customers away.

    4. Re:Educate the public? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, see, the issue is that people don't know they're not supposed to pirate DVDs. If pirates knew that movie studios didn't want them to do that, they'd immediately stop.

      It's similar to the way that people didn't know that they were allowed to say "no" to drugs, but when Nancy Reagan told them that they could say "no", suddenly everyone stopped doing drugs.

    5. Re:Educate the public? by Jamu · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Who ordered that?
    6. Re:Educate the public? by hendridm · · Score: 2

      To do what? Download the pirated copies so they don't have to watch the unskippable content?

      That's exactly what I was thinking, though DVDs have been pretty insufferable for a long time with unskippable crap before the menu.

      an ICE spokesman says the intent isn't to deter piracy but to educate the public.

      So they don't want to stop piracy, they just want to tell you about it?? You'd think they'd want to stop piracy through educating the public. :P

    7. Re:Educate the public? by EdIII · · Score: 2

      You don't even need to pirate the movie.

      I have stored a huge number of DVD movies in my family's library by ripping it to an ISO with the PUO's removed. If you are so inclined, you can even remove the trailers from the movie to save space.

      Although since I won't support BluRay I do download BluRay pirate rips of some movies I already own that I really like. Being forced to pay for some extra pixels is just another way they rip you off.

    8. Re:Educate the public? by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly correct. The two 10-second pieces of unskippable "educational" content will serve only to annoy those people who legally purchased the DVD and Bluray discs. Those who acquire illegal copies will not be subject to such annoyances.

      That sounds like a good plan to me if the goal is to push paying customers away.

      Yes and no. I (and I think many /.'ers are similar to me in this regard) do get annoyed by this sort of thing, yet I am also inclined to support the entertainment that I enjoy. As a result, I do in fact go out and buy the shows that I like to watch to send a (I know it is meager) message to the content creators "Hey, this makes you money. Make more of THIS." but I do come home, transcode it to a nice file without all the rubbish advertising and crap "announcements" that they put on the loading sectors of discs. I was quite amused by Startgate SG1 for example, but towards the latter half of the series, each time I inserted a disc, forcing me to watch (I kid you not) A Fox? Studios advertisment, followed by a trailer for Startgate Contimuum, then a trailer for the Stargate video game, then an advertisement for Stargate Altantis, then an anti-piracy message? Give me a break. If I am buying the damned discs, you have made your money and let me enjoy my content already.

      So while I do enjoy feeling good about supporting the entertainment that I enjoy, the taste is often more and more bitter. The only upside is that some content providers seem to get the message and skip anything like that. From a pragmatic point of view, I think that actually makes me enjoy that more as I am no longer associating that show with forced advertising.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    9. Re:Educate the public? by chipschap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "No, see, the issue is that people don't know they're not supposed to pirate DVDs."

      Right, that's why they want to put a warning on something that you DIDN'T pirate, to tell you that you shouldn't do what you didn't do in the first place, and probably never planned to do ... except now they've got you thinking about it ... maybe next time you just might!

    10. Re:Educate the public? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I think that actually is their goal. The more people they push to infringement, the more they get to say "See? We need these laws because more people are infringing than ever!" I just shudder to think about what other annoyance schemes they could come up with.

      --
      FC Closer
    11. Re:Educate the public? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That sounds like a good plan to me if the goal is to push paying customers away.

      That!

      I found myself watching less and less purchased content after the "warnings" and the interminable previews. To the point where I haven't bought anything for 4 or so years now. It's just too much a PITA.

      And it's silly too, which is part of the issue. How many people don't know that it is illegal to copy and sell copyrighted videos? Finally, it's such a nice treat to get a threat of fines or imprisonment. Wow - these movies are dangerous stuff! No thanks, I'll just watch whatever is on the net that is free, not really any need to do the illegal stuff. And I have more discretionary money now too.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Educate the public? by arose · · Score: 2

      "Hey, this makes you money. Make more of THIS"

      ...and they will happily add more unskippable crap. Because THIS is the complete package, I don't think there is a winning choice.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    13. Re:Educate the public? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The masters don't give a fuck, at all, about us. Therefore we have zero moral obligation to care about them.

      If someone is your enemy, it's OK to do anything you can get away with to them. Anything.

      I don't bother ripping their brainwashing garbage though. They don't deserve access to my mind.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Educate the public? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting that you had those problems with SG-1. I'm in the UK, and actually found those DVDs to be relatively sane in the amount of junk shoved on the front; almost everything could be skipped.

      (Aside: I don't think there's any excuse for making anything unskippable, and I think using patents to lock down DVD players so no-one can sell one that ignores the no-skip instruction on the disc even though there is clearly an ample market for such a device is an excellent argument for nullifying that kind of patent entirely, but that's another story.)

      I wonder how much of this is going to be locale-based rather than universal, if they're already doing different things on different regions' DVDs (I assume). Then again, I get particularly irritated by having to sit through copyright-related junk at the start of the DVD that doesn't even apply to me because it's based on copyright laws in another country, so obviously not everything is localised for my market (UK).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    15. Re:Educate the public? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or use a DVD player that is not blessed by the DVD consortium.

      Is it so hard to make a DVD player that plays the movie when you put it in?

      A No it is not hard, just not allowed.

      http://www.geexbox.org/ Play your movie. The menu and extras can be viewed if desired.

      This is exactly the question I was wondering. But why is it not allowed.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    16. Re:Educate the public? by Trogre · · Score: 1, Troll

      Please don't compare downloading movies with drug use. It's really not helping anybody.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    17. Re:Educate the public? by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To do what? Download the pirated copies so they don't have to watch the unskippable content?

      Exactly my thought. And it is disingenuous to call these "government warnings" when they are really industry warnings. My warning to the industry is: "you are losing me".

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    18. Re:Educate the public? by pkinetics · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because its not allowed.

      Pvt. Joe Bowers: What *are* these electrolytes? Do you even know?

      Secretary of State: They're... what they use to make Brawndo!

      Pvt. Joe Bowers: But *why* do they use them to make Brawndo?

      Secretary of Defense: [raises hand after a pause] Because Brawndo's got electrolytes.

    19. Re:Educate the public? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you've hit the nail on the head.

      A lesson to the studios:
      If you want to deter pirating, make the official and legal copy MORE CONVENIENT than the pirated version.
      Yes, 20 seconds isn't a lot of time. But every time someone puts in a DVD and has to watch it for the 100th time, they're going to get annoyed. And maybe next time they WON'T buy your product because they feel insulted.
      We could sit here and argue all night about whether pirating a copy to spite a studio is okay morally (and I'm very, very certain that's what will happen) but at the end of the day it boils down to this, right or wrong: Annoy your customers, and they'll go someplace else, legal or not.

    20. Re:Educate the public? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was my firs thought:

      It is there to educate the public on the benefits of piracy.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    21. Re:Educate the public? by FirephoxRising · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe that they can put in unskippable content! I refuse to sit through warnings that are not effective in Australia, and even adds for things that will not skip either! I download most movies and even the ones I buy (to support small artists/studios I like) I immediately rip and put onto the network for use on the HTPCs and laptops.

    22. Re:Educate the public? by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I was quite amused by Startgate SG1 for example, but towards the latter half of the series, each time I inserted a disc, forcing me to watch (I kid you not) A Fox? Studios advertisment, followed by a trailer for Startgate Contimuum, then a trailer for the Stargate video game, then an advertisement for Stargate Altantis, then an anti-piracy message? Give me a break. If I am buying the damned discs, you have made your money and let me enjoy my content already.

      I almost always watch mine on VLC, so I don't get the intro stuff. However, what is annoying is the fact that the MGM logo gets shown before every single episode. (Seasons 1-2 on the 5-discs-in-one-jewel-case-flip-book edition at least) Seriously, what is the point of that? All it does is destroy the mood.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    23. Re:Educate the public? by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_Forum

      They promised the content providers

      Region Encoding
      Copy Protection
      Encryption
      Forced viewing of the piracy warning

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    24. Re:Educate the public? by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      The warning doesn't bother me - I rent from netflix, use DvdShrink to rip the disc (movie only) to an ISO file, then send the disk back. I literally never see the screens they've already got telling me not to do what I'm doing; adding more (that I also won't see) doesn't change the situation.

    25. Re:Educate the public? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I could never understand why people pay twice the price for a name-brand, region-locked dvd player that won't even do what you tell it to.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    26. Re:Educate the public? by Tennekis · · Score: 1

      You know, I stopped downloading things when a combination of Netflix Streaming and HBO Go augmented with the once in a blue moon iTunes purchase made it no longer worth my time to futz about on TPB to watch a movie. However, I think, given this nonsense, I'll start again, and see if I can race the DVD and connect to the BitTorrent swarm first. This is getting seriously abusive.

      --
      Mr. President, we can't let him in here, he'll see everything, he'll see the Big Board!
    27. Re:Educate the public? by Idbar · · Score: 2

      Can the government copyright the message and charge the studios royalties for it? That would be a great way to get rid of the message.

    28. Re:Educate the public? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      On a second thought, the person that patented "displaying annoying warning messages " is probably making a ton of money. Right?

    29. Re:Educate the public? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      To be a revolutionary, that's what!

      If they can push you far enough, throw on enough petty, annoying, pointless restrictions, you should revolt. You'll start breaking bad laws, and you'll be a better person for it. You won't be so fearful. You'll see how foolish unthinking obedience to all authority is. You won't walk off a cliff if some authority figure orders it. You'll see that the real purpose of many regulations is to increase the wealth and control of the already rich and powerful. You'll have to exercise your judgment to discern the good laws from the bought laws that are just thinly disguised power or money grabs, but that shouldn't be too hard.

      Not exactly what they intended, but then, we know they aren't too bright.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    30. Re:Educate the public? by TriezGamer · · Score: 2

      It really depends a lot on the quality of the download. If I want just a standard DVD rip (~5 GB), my connection could have it downloaded in ~24 minutes (~3.5 MB/s). Decent HD rips really only double that.

      Download speeds are rapidly becoming irrelevant to the argument, though. While some people might spontaneously decide to watch _x_ film RIGHT NOW, many people can just as easily decide what they want to watch in an hour, and do something else to kill time while it downloads.

    31. Re:Educate the public? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      To do what? Download the pirated copies so they don't have to watch the unskippable content?

      Exactly my thought. And it is disingenuous to call these "government warnings" when they are really industry warnings. My warning to the industry is: "you are losing me".

      They lost me a long time ago. The last time I went to a movie, I brought a laser pointer - after all, if I'm going there for entertainment, I'm going to have some fun while they insult my intelligence by running an anti-piracy commercial IN A MOVIE THEATRE!!???

      Don't download either ... I just wait 6 months to 2 years and it comes right over the airwaves, in 50" 1920 x 1080 hi-def, for free, no "shoes sticking to the floor of the movie house from spilled soda" crap, convenient "intermissions" several times an hour to use the bathroom or visit the kitchen, etc.

      I think I've seen Iron Man three times, Transformers a couple of times, and avoided crap like The Green Lantern. When there's nothing on, there's always the net, a good book, walk the dogs, call someone, go out, game console, whatever ...

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    32. Re:Educate the public? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Not exactly correct. A lot of pirated DVDs already come with unskippable "educational" content about why Gold discs are better than Blue ones etc.

    33. Re:Educate the public? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The next steps are forced purchasing (via taxes), then forced watching of the content (it's edutainment!).

    34. Re:Educate the public? by kbdd · · Score: 2
      As we all know that worked pretty well.

      Reminds me of the gentleman's club beyond the iron curtain 30 years ago that was not doing any business.

      The government was asking the manager how come?

      The manager responded: "I don't know, I have the best girls, all party members for at least 40 years."

    35. Re:Educate the public? by xQx · · Score: 1

      Isn't this a fantastic demonstration of how well democracy works is in today's world.

      Yeah, America's democracy is VASTLY DIFFERENT from communist China.

      Here we have the greatest democracy in the world forcing propaganda on its citizens to assert a law that, more than half the population not only DO NOT AGREE WITH, but when told what it is, ADMIT TO HAVING BROKEN.

      Dear America: I don't give a rats arse that you are so apathetic about your government's move to one dollar per vote rather than one person per vote, nor do I give a rats arse about your complete apathy as your 'select few' keep passing shitty laws to protect their power, but would you please tell them to stop forcing it on the rest of the world in the form of "free trade" treaties. In the meantime, enjoy your illusion of choice.

    36. Re:Educate the public? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because that's what they sell at best buy?

    37. Re:Educate the public? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Of course he doesn't want to pay for them AGAIN.

      What kind of retard wants to pay for something once they've already paid for it once?

      My post-digital music collection is much smaller for that very reason. I'm not going to buy certain albums again. I only paid a buck for them used the first time around anyways.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    38. Re:Educate the public? by Tooke · · Score: 4, Funny

      might as well just join the tautology club

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    39. Re:Educate the public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But why is it not allowed

      To educate the public.

    40. Re:Educate the public? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we don't allow public educators to indulge in the lifestyles the likes of the condescending Hollywood piddleshits live. Not wholesome or beneficial, no teachers licence, do not pass go. Remove the "educational "portion of the film or face the wrath of the NEA.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    41. Re:Educate the public? by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      What needs to be done in response is for people who put out Creative Commons and other free (as in freedom) works to put together a couple PSA pieces to put on any DVDs of their works that they release. Of course, these would be freely skippable.

      These PSAs would encourage the viewers to embrace CC and PD and to voluntarily support those who do so, perhaps also giving a nod to EFF and other digital freedoms oriented organizations.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    42. Re:Educate the public? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Educate the public? this is backwards!

      The public has been trying to educate the movie industry for 15+ YEARS that the current model sucks.

      Why are we having "more of the same" shoved down our necks when clearly the current model doesn't work (not for us, not for them)??!

      Someone in the movie industry wake up and smell the roses. piracy will always be there. most people will pay for stuff but only what they see value in.
      people will not bother with your stuff if the pirated stuff is: (a) more convenient or (b) better value. And this move is really just making the divide bigger, meaning that the pirate copies provide EVEN BETTER value than before.

      Do you think people LIKE downloading torrents that could contain malware, waiting for hours, sometimes days for things to finish downloading, just to watch footage shot from a camcorder?

      No, its just that that's ALL THEY CAN GET in many cases, because most of your delivery mechanism is broken and outdated.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    43. Re:Educate the public? by Nyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or use a DVD player that is not blessed by the DVD consortium.

      Is it so hard to make a DVD player that plays the movie when you put it in?

      A No it is not hard, just not allowed.

      http://www.geexbox.org/ Play your movie. The menu and extras can be viewed if desired.

      This is exactly the question I was wondering. But why is it not allowed.

      Because the Government likes to punish it's law abiding citizens.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    44. Re:Educate the public? by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1

      In Malaysia (where I live, also a pirate heaven), the dominant pirate gang have for years inserted their own unskippable 10 second video, asking viewers to buy their 'gold-color-plated' pirated DVD instead of some rival gang's 'blue-color-plated' DVD disc (prob some DVD-R), with a short video comparison clip over why their quality is better. So yeah, the pirates are one-up on the game years ago.

    45. Re:Educate the public? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am also inclined to support the entertainment that I enjoy.

      Yet you do admit that the added annoyances bother you and that you remove them from your viewing.

      .
      My point is that /. represents a minority of the world. Yes, you can rip and stream the DVD without the annoyances, but what about most people?

      I am not opposed to supporting the entertainment industry. I just have to wonder why the entertainment industry seems to be in the business of pissing off their legitimate customers? Why is the entertainment industry driving their prospective customers to the pirate industry which provides a better, i.e., less annoying, product?

    46. Re:Educate the public? by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      People are happy to pay for convience. So inconveniencing people discourages sales.

      I do agree with you, that we should pay for our entertainment to keep the entertainment industry going in order to provide us with more entertainment.

      But I feel that I am punished with these inconveniances for being an honest buyer. It's quite simply counter productive.

    47. Re:Educate the public? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The option is to load the disc, and then when it's displaying that crap you make a visit to the toilet, get a beer, make a sandwich or something else.

      You can't force people to read it - you can only annoy people, and if people are annoyed enough they get angry.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    48. Re:Educate the public? by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe that's one of the reason why Best Buy is having a hard time.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    49. Re:Educate the public? by thsths · · Score: 1

      There is a lot more useful stuff you could teach the public than your one sided and only partially correct FBI warning...

      BTW, since when is the Department of Homeland Security going after small time crooks? I thought it was the Department of *Homeland* *Security*, not the Department of Protecting Revenue Streams?

    50. Re:Educate the public? by guttentag · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that they're doing it wrong by putting the warning at the beginning of the disc. Generally people don't know if a movie is worth ripping until after they've seen it. But by the end, they've forgotten that they weren't supposed to rip it. If they put the warning at the end... Say, right before the credits, people who are thinking, "that was really good, I think I'll rip that," will think twice. "Man, it's like they knew what I was thinking." By putting it at the beginning, you're actually encouraging piracy, because the user is thinking, "wow! If this film is so good people are stealing it, I should probably rip it too! Hey, let's rip it while we make dinner and then watch it!"

    51. Re:Educate the public? by meerling · · Score: 1

      Yes, educate the public to the advantages of pirate version to avoid even more intrusive government and corporate annoyances. :)
      How stupid can they be?
      Apparently stupid enough to take that as a challenge. :)

    52. Re:Educate the public? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      Pressing
                Stop Stop Play
      used to skip directly to the start of the movie, but that doesn't seem to work with recent DVDs.
      Worth trying though.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    53. Re:Educate the public? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because DVDs are encrypted. To play a DVD (Without breaking the encryption, which is illegal in most of the world) requires a license from the DVDCCA, who then supply the appropriate key. This license imposes a number of conditions regarding what a DVD player may and may not do, one of which is respecting the can't-skip-this feature. It also requires players respect region lockout, specifies some anti-tamper requirements, prohibits digital outputs without encryption (only video, SPDIF is fine) and things like that. The DVDCCA has gotten quite lax in enforcement now because they realise that with CSS broken there isn't much point.

      Blu-ray runs in exactly the same manner. If you want to (legally) play, you need a license. The license mandates the rest of the DRM, such as requiring HDCP on output.

    54. Re:Educate the public? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Unless they were exceptionally well made, it'd just come across as snobish and condescending.

    55. Re:Educate the public? by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Many disks have this piracy warning, and I have also several that have "unskippable" previews of other DVDs that you have to sit through for about five minutes(!!) before you get to the main menu.

      Our DVD player (Philips brand, so should be up to "standard" on DRM) allows you to press and then as a workaround to get to the menu. That hasn't failed me yet. Having to do this is irritating enough, of course.

    56. Re:Educate the public? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Less problems playing DVD-R. That's why we replaced our player a few years ago.

    57. Re:Educate the public? by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      To do what? Download the pirated copies so they don't have to watch the unskippable content?

      Yep. Or use Netflix, or whatever.

      Doesn't bother me - I gave up on DVDs in 2009. I got tired of the skipping DVDs and rude service at Blockbuster. Went to Netflix, haven't looked back.

    58. Re:Educate the public? by ysth · · Score: 1

      Yes. "Of course, pirated versions won't contain these 20-second notices; however, an ICE spokesman says the intent isn't to deter piracy but to educate the public." makes no sense - does the fine article author not know what "however" means? It would have needed to be "Of course, pirated versions won't contain these 20-second notices; however, an ICE spokesman says the intent isn't to encourage piracy but to educate the public."

    59. Re:Educate the public? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The thing is, even for people who are totally moral and scrupulous, and don't pirate, this will still affect sales. It makes the DVD marginally less desirable. There will be a point where there's enough advertising, warnings and so on that it puts people off.

      If they're law abiding, they won't pirate. This doesn't mean they're going to buy the DVD. They have the option to do neither. People deciding not to buy the things is hardly desirable either.

    60. Re:Educate the public? by Filip22012005 · · Score: 2

      You post is missing the important bits!

      --
      When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    61. Re:Educate the public? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      So it's a rebranded xbmc?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    62. Re:Educate the public? by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

      Yes. I hate that damned unskippable content so much, maybe I'll finally have to stop getting the authorized releases.

    63. Re:Educate the public? by fearofcarpet · · Score: 1

      And you've hit the nail on the head.

      A lesson to the studios: If you want to deter pirating, make the official and legal copy MORE CONVENIENT than the pirated version. Yes, 20 seconds isn't a lot of time. But every time someone puts in a DVD and has to watch it for the 100th time, they're going to get annoyed. And maybe next time they WON'T buy your product because they feel insulted. We could sit here and argue all night about whether pirating a copy to spite a studio is okay morally (and I'm very, very certain that's what will happen) but at the end of the day it boils down to this, right or wrong: Annoy your customers, and they'll go someplace else, legal or not.

      I wonder, though, if the only people that both buy and watch movies on physical disks (as opposed to buying+ripping/downloading or just downloading) are people who don't know how to do the latter. So the only audience that they're reaching with these messages are little kids watching Dora the Explorer on an infinite loop, old people that just discovered DVDs last year, and casual movie watchers that pop in a movie once or twice a month when they don't feel like reading a book. It's like targeting ads for roller-coasters at vertigo support groups.

      One thing is for sure, I'm definitely running out to buy the latest block busters on blu-ray. I'm already sick of the convenience being able to instantly stream hi-def movies to any screen in my house (or tablet or phone while traveling) from a central repository in the closet upstairs. What I really want is to buy blu-ray players for every room in the house and a nice set of shelves to keep the disks on, but I have hesitated because blu-rays still lacked the inconvenience of un-skippable movie trailers and FBI warnings... If I were an android I think this movie studio logic would cause my electronic brain to BSoD.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
    64. Re:Educate the public? by adolf · · Score: 1

      In the US, at least, I've even seen variations between retail movies and rental movies: The rentals sometimes have both extra crap, and the extra features (deleted scenes, wanking commentary) yanked out...even though it is plainly more expensive to stamp out two different versions of a new movie than just one version.

      That said: In this day of Amazon reviews, forums, and Google searches, there is no good reason for anyone so-motivated to be unable to find a DVD player which cannot skip the "unskippable" portions with some minor modification.

      A dozen or so years ago, such players (sometimes with an easy firmware hack, sometimes with a button combo) were available at extraordinarily cheap prices Stateside from importers such as Apex, but I remember from that time that players in the UK were even more widely known to be modifiable (mostly because of the nonsense related to regional coding, the solutions for which also often allowed for skipping the unskippable).

      Even at the polar opposite end of the price spectrum: I have in my living room a Krell DVD Standard that some schmuck[1] once paid $8,000.00 for (and no, that's neither a typo or an exaggeration, but just the actual MSRP). My Krell's firmware current load allows skipping.

      So, I guess my point is this: If someone wants to skip the crap before the movie and has any motivation to do so, it will be fairly painless to do so and/or a Google away.

      [1]: And, no, the schmuck was not me. I got the player literally for free and use it pretty much exclusively as a regular CD player, which it excels at. It is also a fine example of engineering overkill on all levels, though I'd never pay anywhere near that much for a single piece of AV gear no matter how pretty it looks inside the box. Meanwhile, the Wal Mart-sourced PS3 Slim beside it does a plainly and obviously better job of playing movies (1080P over HDMI vs. 480P over analog RGBHV on BNC connectors), but then again PS3 can't skip the unskippable bits...

    65. Re:Educate the public? by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      I've given up on legitimate content. I have payTV which I record every show I want to watch and watch it after the fact to fast froward the ads. For anything else I download the pirate version so I'm not forced to swallow what BS the industry thinks I should. Why are movies treated different to music? ie If a CD doesn't need this, why do DVDs?

    66. Re:Educate the public? by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      I would happily purchase content but I cannot bear the optical media format - mainly due to the fact that I have a centralised media centre with XBMC running on several devices. If I could purchase a disk, rip it straight to the server and never touch it again that would be great. So far, I can handle DVDs to but the anti-ripping measures of BluRay have so far stopped me from upgrading my viewing experience to HD. Anti-piracy measures are having an adverse effect on my quality of life due to pixelation.

      If only I could download content in a format that I could use as I wish. This sounds counter-intuitive as a lack of DRM will make piracy easy right? Well, DRM is not exactly stopping piracy is it?

      Now that I have the cash, I will pay for content - but please let me have it in an open digital format, unfettered by warnings. Copying of disks in bulk for sale in mostly cash-sales markets will then soon be a thing of the past. You don't need to look far to see that physical copies of disks are a global problem in Australia , in Indonesia , in the US and in the UK to name just a few.

    67. Re:Educate the public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Because the Government likes to punish it's law abiding citizens."

      The DVD consortium is not the government, it's corporations.

    68. Re:Educate the public? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Irony: the advertisement for Diablo 3 that played before the clip? It allowed me to skip it after five seconds, but didn't allow me to pause or rewind it to watch again....

    69. Re:Educate the public? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because fuck you. That's why

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    70. Re:Educate the public? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      We probably have the same Philips DVD player, but I dont know if this would work on ours, because it has remained in the cupboard for the last 18 months, as we no longer watch DVDs at all. The experience is just too horrible, and the content not worth the pain.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    71. Re:Educate the public? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      Because slapping the customer round the face with a wet fish is the best possible sales tactic!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    72. Re:Educate the public? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      In your case it seems that it's not the advertisements but just the lack of good content.

    73. Re:Educate the public? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      There are video ads on YouTube now?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    74. Re:Educate the public? by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly correct. The two 10-second pieces of unskippable "educational" content will serve only to annoy those people who legally purchased the DVD and Bluray discs. Those who acquire illegal copies will not be subject to such annoyances.

      So really they should make a law that all pirated movie copies must have these unskipable warnings.

    75. Re:Educate the public? by BenJury · · Score: 1

      Or just watch them online from the people who made it...

      --
      Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    76. Re:Educate the public? by jimshatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course these taxes don't actually entitle you to copy stuff that you don't already own but hey, it wouldn't be corruption and lobbyism if it would benefit anybody but a few select assholes.

      Not exactly. In the Netherlands you are allowed to create copies of works for private use (Thuiskopie(dutch for home copy)), even for works you don't own. This is being payed for by the taxes on empty media. These taxes make it very hard for copyright-lobbyists to make private copies illegal.

      This is also why downloading content for private use is not illegal in The Netherlands, as long as you don't upload (so bittorrent is illegal for pirated works).

    77. Re:Educate the public? by minasoko · · Score: 1

      I would happily purchase content but I cannot bear the optical media format - mainly due to the fact that I have a centralised media centre with XBMC running on several devices. If I could purchase a disk, rip it straight to the server and never touch it again that would be great. So far, I can handle DVDs to but the anti-ripping measures of BluRay have so far stopped me from upgrading my viewing experience to HD.

      I use the same setup and until fairly recently was in the same boat regarding Blu-Ray. Have you tried MakeMKV? Granted you'll have to invest in a BR drive for your PC, but they are not expensive. Now I can enjoy the product I want (the content), in an un-encumbered, transferrable format that's a bit-perfect reproduction of the feature. Also, if I want, I can transcode it to whatever format I feel like.

      When I see news about services like Paramount's new online store, I have to shake my head and wonder what on earth the content providers are smoking.

    78. Re:Educate the public? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Or buy AnyDVD which strips off stuff like unskippable so you can sail through it. AnyDVD also works a charm at ripping virtually all DVDs and the large majority of blu ray disks. Doesn't strip out Cinavia though.

    79. Re:Educate the public? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      To play a DVD (Without breaking the encryption, which is illegal in the US)

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    80. Re:Educate the public? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      I think it has a lot more to do with their piss-poor customer service and over-the-top pimping of the service plans, myself. I honestly don't know anybody that's had a good experience in a Best Buy in at least a year...not that it's a common topic of conversation or anything.

    81. Re:Educate the public? by VMaN · · Score: 1

      Illegal in most of the world? Aren't we just talking about stuff that's banned in the DMCA?

    82. Re:Educate the public? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      In the US, the DMCA would be the appropriate law. Outside of the US, there are often similar laws. In the EU, for example, there is the European Union Copyright Directive (or more precisely, the member countries' implimentations of the EUCD) which bans drm-circumvention technology in a similar manner.

    83. Re:Educate the public? by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      People not buying it is perfectly desirable to the content producers in Hollywood. They want you back and locked into only viewing their content in movie theaters.

      They are doing this kind of crap essentially in the hopes it will kill the markets for any of their content that doesn't require you paying $10+ a ticket to go see. They don't want us watching at home, on our computers, or on other portable devices. They don't make as much money that way, and *gasp*, people can even watch for free!

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    84. Re:Educate the public? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's XBMC Live with a shittier package manager. Or, if you prefer, XBMC-Live-Lite. XBMC Live is already plenty light, however, so actually it simply has no real reason to exist.

      You know what would actually be meaningful? tomato or dd-wrt with XBMC. Then you could actually have remote management, instead of having to jump to the command line to configure the system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    85. Re:Educate the public? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I've seen a couple of DVDs in the UK with a very brief thing at the start saying 'thank you for paying for this, look at the other films we've been able to make as a result of people doing this'. It's the same message, and it combines the anti-piracy warning with the trailers (and, yes, is skippable), but it somehow doesn't leave you thinking 'well, fuck you too, studios' like the older 'the pirates are out to get you' ones.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    86. Re:Educate the public? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      It's the same for us. I started ripping DVDs of my kids' shows about 8 years ago as I didn't want them trashing the originals. Now I don't even bother ripping them as all the shows they want to watch are on netflix. We just fire up the Wii and away they go.

      Most of what's on the home server video-wise are my personal collection of stuff. (Mythbusters episodes, various Anime that I downloaded before you could get them in the States, other random stuff, etc.) My wife is the only one who even uses the DVD player anymore and even then just to watch the occasional classic movie DVD that Netflix doesn't have available in it's streaming library.

      I've also discovered Crunchyroll for Android (yes, I know I'm very late to that party.) and have been streaming Anime on that. We still buy DVDs (no blueray) but just for the sake of having them as part of a collection. I have a few that are several years old and still in the shrinkwrap.

      All in all, we are slowly swapping over to all streaming and downloads. There's just no reason save for collecting to keep buying and using DVDs.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    87. Re:Educate the public? by Inda · · Score: 1

      I said that ten years ago on Slashdot. I said everyone should buy cheap 20 pound/dollar/euro DVD players. No one listens to me. I may as well type to myself.

      sadkjhaksjdhhasfsfddf

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    88. Re:Educate the public? by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      I have a Phillips DVD player from 7 or 8 years back that works the same, it also goes into region free mode if I punch in a certain sequence on the remote. I suspect the people at Phillips we're a big fan of these requirements, however I haven't been able to find any with these same features recently.

    89. Re:Educate the public? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      wasn't the "FBI Warning" itself determined to be illegal?

      Do you have a link for that?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    90. Re:Educate the public? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. In the Netherlands you are allowed to create copies of works for private use (Thuiskopie(dutch for home copy)), even for works you don't own.

      In theory something similar this is true in Germany, too. However that only applies to copies from "legal sources" which at most has been acknowledged to be closest friends. However - the 2nd - you are not allowed to circumvent copy-protection mechanisms while doing so, e.g. DVD CSS. On top of that, lobby groups actively work to further reduce any rights consumers have even further.

      It's effectively a useless excuse for rights management groups to rip-off people.

    91. Re:Educate the public? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      *fires up bittorrent to find IT Crowd*

    92. Re:Educate the public? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      There's a club dedicated to stretching things tight?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    93. Re:Educate the public? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Drugs == False Reality
      Movies == False Reality

      Unfortunately, at this time you can only torrent movies, you cannot torrent drugs...

    94. Re:Educate the public? by randizzle3000 · · Score: 1

      They think the pirated copies still have the warnings. Remember how smart they are.

    95. Re:Educate the public? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      one of which is respecting the can't-skip-this feature.

      And if they catch you violating it, it's gonna be hammer time.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    96. Re:Educate the public? by ibutsu · · Score: 1

      Canada supposedly does the same, but it hasn't shut the copyright lobby up one bit. Unfortunately, the governments in power tend to listen to them more than us.

    97. Re:Educate the public? by Elbart · · Score: 1

      "The service is not currently available in your area." This international network is an awesome thing!

    98. Re:Educate the public? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I have an Oppo for which a Russian gentleman posted hacked firmware the disables it's UOPs (user prohibited operations). Pretty great, menu, skip and FF buttons work at all times no matter what.

      Of course it doesn't play blu-rays, and I only use DVDs to rip to get portable files these days, so I am more or les back in the same boat I started until I get a BD drive and some bigger hard drives.

    99. Re:Educate the public? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Same here, an ad before a video had something I wanted to rewind and see better, and I was stunned to find I could not replay the ad. I guess they cannot allow rewind without allowing FF. Derp.

    100. Re:Educate the public? by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      What ad?

      Adblock Plus. Get it, and stop dealing with ad's.

    101. Re:Educate the public? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      For any older blu-ray worth owning, the studio had to had to spend money re-scanning and remastering everything for higher res and higher quality sound. If you think that's a ripoff, don't buy it. But claiming you're entitled to it because rebuying for a few extra pixels is a ripoff is a load of crap. If it's "just a few extra pixels", why do you want it in the first place over the DVD version? Not worth the $40 list price they slap on the things, but definitely worth the $10-20 price you can get most movies for on Blu-ray at Amazon or numerous other places.

      The argument the other way around I totally buy. Downloading a DVD or other SD rip of a blu-ray you own so you have a more compact portable copy is something you would easily be able to make from your own blu-ray if not for DRM.

    102. Re:Educate the public? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I just use VLC on Linux and it skips all the shit and goes straight to the menu. I was appalled by how many previews / ads some of my DVDs had when watching them on friend's DVD players because I just don't see them normally.

    103. Re:Educate the public? by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      I think I've seen Iron Man three times, Transformers a couple of times, and avoided crap like The Green Lantern.

      Wait, wait, wait. I've got to second SmallFurryCreature's sentiments here. In what universe does Transformers not get dumped into the "crap" bin with The Green Lantern? It's Michael Bay, for crying out loud. It spends the first half of the movie about Transformers focusing on the developing love story between two high school kids! The only Transformer to be seen in the first 40 minutes (minus the opening teaser scene) of the story spends the entire time in the form of a car ... that can just do some weird stuff. After that, the rest is a bunch of twitchy camera crap action sequences where you can't tell what is going on, except some robots do some shit and stuff blows up.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    104. Re:Educate the public? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      HairyFISH? Are you hairyfeet with a new account? At any rate, if I were modding you'd get an insightful. That was an excellent question. I'm not sure of the answer, but I think it had to do with the evolution of recorded media.

      When the Gramophone came out, there was no way to copy one. Tape wasn't invented until WWII, and it did't reach the public until about 1960. There was no need for a piracy warning before 1960 because piracy wasn't possible.

      When cassettes and 8 tracks became common, the record companies would routinely put FBI warnings on records, often just making shit up. At the time, there was no law against taping your LPs.

      When VCRs came along they put the warnings at the beginning of the movie with the trailers, which was fine, because first, you want content-free space at the beginning of the tape because thet's where the tape will be worn the most. You could fast forward easily enough.

      They stepped it up a notch with DVDs, making the crap that was useful (quality of the content) but skippable something that was useless and unskippable.

    105. Re:Educate the public? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      The second time I watched it was in French on TVA (no sub-titles). Consider it "educational".

      If everyone took a couple of hours a week to watch a rerun in a second language, they'd pick up an "ear" for it within a few years at most. It's a lot better technique than trying to learn a second language in school, which is counter-productive because it's freaking BORING!

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    106. Re:Educate the public? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The rentals sometimes have both extra crap, and the extra features (deleted scenes, wanking commentary) yanked out...even though it is plainly more expensive to stamp out two different versions of a new movie than just one version.

      I was informed by the rental folks here in town that the rental DVDs are also lower quality than ones you buy (this after I rented Avatar and Surrogates and could not find a copy that would play well).

    107. Re:Educate the public? by flytripper · · Score: 1

      The "education" will be akin to equating a ripper, d/l'er to a pedophile.

    108. Re:Educate the public? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I was actually entertained one time by the piracy warning... the Simpsons movie, where the FBI warning was followed by an EPA disclaimer that looked exactly like the FBI warning.

      You know, I think that was Tom Hanks' best movie... and I like his movies.

    109. Re:Educate the public? by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

      Seems to me its just more attempts to polarize the masses...

      Here's what you'd want one group saying...

      "I've got to watch 20 seconds of this crap because those computer "hackers" are messing everything up!!! Rabble rabble rabble!!!"

      And the other group is saying "Ummm... Do you know what "hacker" means? This isn't about pirating, its about xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

      It doesn't matter what you fill in the xxx's with - the people on the other side of the argument are usually the irrationals who don't usually side with understanding or logic and aren't going to listen.

    110. Re:Educate the public? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      For that matter, as long as you've got a buffer of a few films, you can sit down and watch one RIGHT NOW, after picking out the one you're going to watch tomorrow and setting it to download.

      Back in the day on 2400 baud dialup, it could take an entire week to completely download that 5 minute cinepak video with pcm audio....

    111. Re:Educate the public? by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      That assumes the codec supports it. Before torrents, when P2P was largely sequential, I remember doing this.

    112. Re:Educate the public? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      I do use Adblock Plus, I just tend to disable it on sites I visit regularly unless their ads become annoying.

    113. Re:Educate the public? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Sometimes. I've noticed the more popular a video, the more chance youtube will play an ad before playing the video. Some uploaders will enable the video ads themselves. I don't mind it much, they're short and they're skippable after five seconds (and now that they're geo-targetting, occasionally even relevant :p).

    114. Re:Educate the public? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And what if music CDs had unskippable anti-piracy warnings, plus advertisements for other formats (you own the CD, you know you want the vinyl and the DVD!) and promo clips from bands you don't even like?? So before you get to listen to the content you PAID for, you're forced to hear up to 10 minutes (proportional to the worst of the current DVDs, with 20 minutes of such junk) of garbage ... or hit mute and wait for it to be over. Oh wait, legal players no longer have a mute button.

      Yeah, that would last about two seconds in the market. So why do we put up with this treatment just because it's a DVD?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    115. Re:Educate the public? by Shadoefax · · Score: 1

      You jest, but similar type laws have been enforced. Remember the illegal drug tax stamp from a few years back? Tennessee alone has collected millions.

      --
      All my signatures are stolen from other people. Including this one.
    116. Re:Educate the public? by Occams · · Score: 1

      It is always best to buy a cheap no name Chinese brand DVD player or set top box of any kind. Not only are they much cheaper but all this DRM nonsense and advertising pain is avoidable. They have not been got at by corporates protecting profits at your ex[pense. The brand names are made in the same Chinese factories so the quality difference is moot. The market is supposed to be free, and barriers to entry cause too much friction in letting price fall so that supply will match demand at a point that is acceptyable to consumers.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    117. Re:Educate the public? by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      The DVD consortium is not the government, it's corporations.

      With the force of law behind it.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    118. Re:Educate the public? by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      I think you might be giving them a wee bit too much credit in the brains and planning ahead departments. I think the effect is exactly as you claim - but they have no idea at all that they're causing it. Just morons in suits.

    119. Re:Educate the public? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      But the problem is still the same.

      Its currently more convenient to pirate (sorry, bad term but everyone knows what it refers to) movies than buy them.

      There are always going to be people who are too stingy to pay $5 to watch a movie, so going after those people is stupid. They are not potential customers. They are also not hurting the industry (because they are not potential customers)

      The solution is to target those who would pay for the movie if it was (a) affordable and (b) easily available.

      Make it more convenient than the "free" offering, and that way people have something worth paying for.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    120. Re:Educate the public? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      If someone is your enemy, it's OK to do anything you can get away with to them. Anything.

      No, that's simply evil.

      Your attitude is actually more morally bankrupt than the studios' attitude.

      Who decides who your enemy is? Where do you draw the line? Murder? Hey, you said "Anything."

      Even war, which is all about killing people, has rules.

      How did you come upon such a psychopathic attitude? What's wrong with you?

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  2. ya it educates the public. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pirated copies dont have annoying 20 second warnings and dont cost any money. go pirates!

    1. Re:ya it educates the public. by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      Seriously, it seems like they are making it as difficult as they possibly can to "do the right thing". What a PITA.

  3. Whenever those asinine warnings come up .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think of this: Video Pirates

    1. Re:Whenever those asinine warnings come up .... by sco08y · · Score: 2

      I think of this: Video Pirates

      Same here. It's also very instructional in proper naval tactics: do not try to catch a falling mast.

  4. that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by JcMorin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have kids and I prefer thing that start right away then the real version I purchase. So I create a legal copy, remove eveything but the main movie and here I go!

    1. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      I do the same. Last thing I want is slow poorly responding menus with 27 unskippable/hard-to-skip previes, advertisements and warnings. My blu-rays are for the most part permanantly on the shelf. I've ripped every one to an 8000kbps dual-pass mkv file, stored on the house file server, that can play via VLC on the computer connected to the TV.

      I rip the DVDs to 1600kbps mkv files, although that collection is so big that I've only got about 1/3 of them ripped. Will rip more on demand (And when hard drive prices come back down again).

    2. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Can you share what tools / scripts / arguments you use for this?

      I've not found any way to do it without a massive headache. These days I just DeCSS and keep the otherwise pristine ISO file around (I don't do blu-ray, mostly because drives are too expensive for my taste)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I tend to store the ISOs of my DVD movies and I was surprised to find out that the WD Live TV Plus allows you to skip everything simply by pressing the option button and choosing the root menu. WD is not even paying attention to the PUOs.

    4. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Informative

      For DVDs, I find that DVD::RIP (Ubuntu) is excellent assuming you set it up to use the cluster. It works fast - I can rip the VOB files in around 5-8 minutes per movie and the encoding takes 6-9 minutes (although I can be ripping another movie at that stage), and is pretty easy to get most DVDs done. If you do want some more features, then Handbrake is probably the best featured tool out there and it supports .mkvs with h.264 which makes for excellent quality and features. If I am doing shows, I generally switch to my Windows laptop and use DVD-Decrypter and AutoGK combination. Although a little slower, it has a much better queue function between the two of them. AutoGK also has an excellent "Show only Forced Subtitles" function which is fantastic for movies where you do want subtitles, but only for a few scenes, and not the entire time.

      While certain discs do have exceptionally troublesome protection on them, AnyDVD seems to work a charm and also greatly increases the rip time as the ripping software no longer has to decrypt on the fly, but treats the data as having no encryption.

      While I haven't tinkered with BR discs yet, I have read that BR on Ubuntu is tedious at the moment, I will eventually start the process up.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    5. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      So for the added cost of the real thing, you get the added unskippable ads, the added work of ripping this disk, the added cost of a DVD-R, and the added work of burning the disk and writing the title on it.

      While if you buy the pirated one at 1/10th the price of the official release, you're good to go immediately.

    6. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      I use DVDFab to decrypt both DVD and blu-ray to hard drive using the "copy whole disc" feature.

      I use StaxRip for Blu-rays. I've found handbrake doesn't do subtitles correctly on Blu-Rays, and I like StaxRip better overall anyway (Can't really put my finger on why). I encode all my rips at 8000kbps dual-pass with 384kbps AC3 audio. Staxrip has a two-step process. It first demuxes the bluray source to a single audio file, a single video file, and multiple subtitle files, then in the second step it transcodes all of these into a single .mkv (or m4v) file. I've gotten best results ripping the DTS master to FLAC during the demux process, then encoding the result to AC3 on the transcode sweep. I set the quality to dual-pass instead of constant quality and set the bitrate to 8000kbps (which I've found to be a very good setting for most encodes to be watched on either a 50" plasma TV in the living room or a 28" monitor at my desk), and I use the "slower" preset. they mean it when they say "slower". I average right around 1fps on a dual core athlon II 245. average encodes are 36-48 hours. I don't care though because that's my file server and it's on 24/7 anyway, plus I figure if I'm going to do it, I'm going to do it right the first time.

      DVDs I use a very similar process, except I use handbrake. Handbrake doesn't reveal the x264 presets, it has it's own presets. I just use the default "high" setting with a few minor tweaks. anamorphic is set to None. Since the audio is already in ac3 on DDs, I just do a straight "pass-through", and I have to manually add the subtitles (staxrip does it for you on blurays) to the container. I use 1600kbps for DVDs. I've tried higher, but I can't really see much if any improvement. DVDs are only so good to begin with (curse high res monitors for showing us this! i remember when DVDs were a revelation of clarity).

      I used to use x264's CQ (VBR) with a setting of 20, 19, or even 18, but unlike VBR in audio encoding, I've gotten -very- inconsistent results from CQ, which is why I've now reverted back to dual-pass encoding. I've seen CQ encode one blu-ray at an average of 5000kbps, and the next one at 13000kbps, when the movies are similar in genre, composition, and age. I've seen it insist that a movie only needs 6000kbps when I can -see- the artifacting clear as day, etc. I'm hoping that CQ becomes usable one day, as I'm a big fan of true VBR, and it's faster to boot, but right now it's not something I can trust.

    7. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by minasoko · · Score: 1

      I posted this above, but depending on your requirements, Blu-Ray on Linux may not be that tedious.

      MakeMKV will take care of ripping the stream for you and Handbrake will transcode from the mkv. Personally, I prefer to not transcode, which means I have the Blu-Ray title in my XBMC library and ready to watch in 30 mins or so. I don't have a huge Blu-Ray library, but I've yet to come across a title it cannot decrypt.

      Mostly, I don't need subs, but if you want to transcode and need subtitles, there are methods that aren't painful. Because XBMC is so flexible, it can support a myriad of subtitle formats. If the subtitles add-on for XBMC cannot locate a suitable sub from one of the many online sources (which is rare in my experience), there are several tools that can export the subtitle stream from the mkv into a format XBMC is happy with.
      Basically, there are no barriers for me now and although it's not perfect (I'd prefer to be able to buy my media in an open format to begin with), at least I can now enjoy the brilliant high-bitrate video streams of Blu-Ray format in a way that's extremely convenient to me.

    8. Re:that's the reason I prefer the pirate version by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I will look into it this very evening when I get back home from work.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  5. Pirates by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As with DRMed music, the pirates will win because they OFFER A BETTER PRODUCT.

    1. Re:Pirates by vanyel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They just as well make the 20-second message say "Please rip this disc!" - it's the first thing *I'm* going to do with any disc with this crap on it...

    2. Re:Pirates by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As with DRMed music, the pirates will win because they OFFER A BETTER PRODUCT.

      The pirates are not what caused the music companies to drop DRM. If it was just the pirates, they'd still be pushing broken DRM just like the movie industry won't quit after CSS and AACS and BD+ and HDCP being broken. The only reason is that Apple was dominating online sales and they refused to license FairPlay, they were getting a monopoly on distribution. The studios couldn't live with that but to get competition they had to drop DRM and start selling regular MP3s and AACs. The music industry surrendered, the movie industry will fight to the very last man. Someone drop a few nukes on them and make them surrender please (doing it from orbit optional).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Pirates by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Someone drop a few nukes on them and make them surrender please (doing it from orbit optional).

      No it's not. It's the only way to be sure.

    4. Re:Pirates by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 1

      I doubt they will win. While the music industry is tanking, the movie business is still more profitable than ever. The reason: 1. You can't download the experience of going to a nice movie theatre (especially a REAL IMAX theatre). 2. FIlms make a great deal of their money off of television deals.

    5. Re:Pirates by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Absolutely correct.

      That's why DRM doesn't work, it's simply self-defeating. You see the same with the e-books: Amazon's DRM allowed them to control the market, recently publishers started to drop DRM.

      The only puzzling about the last one is that the DRM e-books market was started up only by the time the music market was already dropping DRM. Yet the publishers still insisted on DRM. Though they learned much faster than the music publishers!

    6. Re:Pirates by dwpro · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain we can thank Apple for all that, Amazon was selling DRM free since 2007, and was larger than apple in digital mp3 sales until later in 2008, despite not having Apple's hardware leverage.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  6. Educate? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the intent is not to deter piracy, what are they educating the public about? How to rip their disks to avoid the warning?

    There must be an enormous cost associated with this - 20 seconds multiplied by every time a DVD is played sounds like a lot of wasted time, and according to ICE, it's not even supposed to deter piracy. So what's the point?

    1. Re:Educate? by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the intent is not to deter piracy, what are they educating the public about? How to rip their disks to avoid the warning?

      About how much of the worlds governments are bought and paid for by Hollywood. I think even my (proverbial) Mother will understand this one.

    2. Re:Educate? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      If the intent is not to deter piracy, what are they educating the public about?

      Hopefully, the studios that haven't bought into this scheme will label their DVDs accordingly, this way I can just buy their movies and skip this entire idiotic nonsense.

    3. Re:Educate? by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point? It's to move people to digital downloads and streaming services, where you don't get all this crap, but where the studio has more control over the content (they can disable playback.)

    4. Re:Educate? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      If the intent is not to deter piracy, what are they educating the public about? How to rip their disks to avoid the warning?

      About how much of the worlds governments are bought and paid for by Hollywood. I think even my (proverbial) Mother will understand this one.

      It's mostly just the Democratic Party of the United States that is bought and paid for by Hollywood. Obviously, other countries have their own film industries and political parties.

    5. Re:Educate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apologies for the repost.

      This isn't as bad as the advert "you're a car thief if you copy DVDs". It had loud music and camera flashing scenes. When I put on my kids DVDs (eg. Thomas the Tank Engine), the kids would go ballistic at the sounds and images. They would become so agitated that I started to rip the movies so they would start quicker and not cause upset.

      What drives these idiots?

      For the record, having ripped DVDs, I do not steal cars, let alone deal drugs.

      AC

    6. Re:Educate? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The government is short on money, what better way to recoup it that fining the collective asses off copyright infringers?

      How about taxing "IP" as assets, since they want to treat them that way in every other respect?

    7. Re:Educate? by MaXintosh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It'll probably get lost in the junk down here, but I was curious just how many human life equivellents was being sapped by these inane ads. If you look up the 2011 sales figures, the top 100 DVDs sold 147 million copies. Assuming each was watched only once, and by one person, the anti-piracy warnings waste a total of 93.27 years of human life per release-year (6.33775293*10^-7 Year Waste/DVD * ~147 million DVD/Release Year).

      I'm comfortable with that dimensional analysis. Easy peezy. I'm less sure about the power consumption of warning: 20 seconds at 35 watts (A typical DVD player) would be 700 watt seconds. That times 147 million would come out to around 28.58 Megawatt Hours a year. That seems a bit much, though, so I may have made a mistake there. The average home supposedly uses around 11 megawatt hours a year. At 11 cents a kw/hr, that's 3,144.16666 dollars.
      Now I'm not sure how to price leisure time, but I think the right economic thing to do would be to assume it's worth greater than or equal to the alternative activity (earning whatever per hour). I don't know what that number is, so I'm just going to assume it's a buck fifty arbitrarily. I don't think I could find many people to sit willing to sit being bored for 1.50 an hour, but I don't have time to dig through the lit to find a better one. At 1.50 an hour, the 20 seconds waste around 1.22 Million Dollars a year. which is a fair bit than the 3.1 Thousand dollars wasted electricity.

      For those who must know, 93.27 years is 0.000213 Library of Congress equivalents, assuming you can read one book a week.

    8. Re:Educate? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      Sadly I am incompetent on this part, but wouldn't it be useful to have a user generated content site with these details of disks? Things like "Unskippable ad time", the quality and duration of the extra's, what subtitle/audio languages it has, what region it is. Stuff that I want to know when buying a disk (my parents require Dutch subtitles before buying a disk, Amazon doesn't give that data, sadly). Coupled with a link to the IMDB entry and links to Amazon and stuff like that.
      Sadly I have little knowledge of this stuff (despite being an avid /. reader).

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    9. Re:Educate? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Assuming you buy them to rip them you aren't even a movie "thief". You paid for the content. Assuming you are not spreading it (over the internet or by hand) you aren't even doing anything that's illegal in the Netherlands.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  7. Stupider and stupider by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Stupider and stupider by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      So true... I stopped buying DVD's and just watch Netflix instant watch.... cheaper then 1 DVD/month and i get access to thousands...

      Network with friends and usually someone buys that awesome movie when it comes out.. So 1 purchase = 1-2 viewings for 8 of us over a week or two to pass the disc around... A win solution since watching a movie on Blu-Ray is not worth 2 tickets to the theater.. I may watch the DVD/Blu-ray 4-5 times in it's lifetime, and rarely would i feel a void in my heart for not having a movie.

    2. Re:Stupider and stupider by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      This handy flow chart explains why

      So if I pirate I see another movie than when I buy legally? Now, The Matrix is far more fun than that other movie seems to be so I'd prefer the legal road, thank you very much.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:Stupider and stupider by iter8 · · Score: 1

      I wish you hadn't posted that link. I just wasted 10 minutes looking at pictures of bad tattoos. BUT, it's still better than wasting 20 seconds every time I watch a DVD

  8. Why? by Oliver_Etchebarne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who will see that screen _already_ have bought an original DVD...

    --
    drmad
    1. Re:Why? by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      This is why I am really annoyed with the Firefly dvd. I purchased the dvd set I don't need to be bashed in the face every time I play the dvd. Gah.

      Makes me wonder why people bother buying the dvd

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    2. Re:Why? by RelaxedTension · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who will see that screen _already_ have bought an original DVD...

      Exactly. The only thing you should see is a 5 second "Thank you for supporting our business".

    3. Re:Why? by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      Buy the BluRay, leave in shrink wrap, fire up Bittorrent. Enjoy movie that you purchased.

      With my connection speed I can download the movie and be watching more quickly than waiting through the unskippable shit on the BluRay telling me that I should have bought it and not been an evil pirate, oh and here's some more movies you might want to buy!

    4. Re:Why? by v1 · · Score: 1

      People who will see that screen _already_ have bought an original DVD...

      True. And the only ones that won't be reading it will be the people that, arguably, they want to "inform".

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:Why? by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      The corporate scumbags want to make sure the next DVD these people see is also original. Scare the masses into submission.

    6. Re:Why? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      No, I can download a few gigs in 3 minutes. Most HD rips are under 10GB. Not much point downloading the raw BR rip at 20+GB per movie - I mean, I have the source BR for that if I want it.

    7. Re:Why? by steelfood · · Score: 2

      And even that should be placed after the credits at the very end.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    8. Re:Why? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Peace of mind, and the ability to self-justify downloading.

  9. No Thanks by alanmeyer · · Score: 1

    Just one more reason to not buy any preview-infested Blu-Ray discs and just use my $$ to stream videos from the internet.

  10. Are they trying to make people stop buying DVDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wonderful. Yet ANOTHER reason to never buy another movie on DVD or Blu Ray again. Congratulations, movie studios on pissing off even more of your PAYING CUSTOMERS. I mean, really -- at this point are you intentionally trying to put yourselves out of business?

  11. You didn't had these allready? by santax · · Score: 2

    Here in the Netherlands, where it is perfectly legal to download a movie (can't upload though) we have these since VHS... First a FBI warning, an institute that as absolutely no rights or business here, then a RIAA warning (again, no business here) and then the Dutch 'Brein' Warning... And then a couple of trailers I have on interest in... All in all you're going to lose between 5 and 10 minutes of your life being told lies that piracy is stealing (which of course it isn't) Man, I the only movie I ever bought was the Godfather collection, v2000, VHS and DVD... Because those are the only 3 movies good enough to tolerate that shit! (Although in practice, I just watch the torrent....)

    1. Re:You didn't had these allready? by russotto · · Score: 3, Informative

      These are different than the ones you're talking about. It seems they've caught on to the workaround of "put the disk in, go make some popcorn / get a beer / take a piss, come back and press 'play movie'". So these will appear after you press 'play movie'. Even more obnoxious. If I were running the pirate bay I'd send them a nice thank-you letter.

    2. Re:You didn't had these allready? by santax · · Score: 1

      Oh wow... that eh, yeah that is kind of idiotic. The copied movies already had more value, but this will only make that worse.

    3. Re:You didn't had these allready? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Haven't you Dutchmen gotten the word? American law applies to all of our allies now.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:You didn't had these allready? by santax · · Score: 1

      While I agree the 2 others are better, I still find the ending of 3 one of the best scenes of all time.

  12. why are we paying for that by RichMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I see this the message I get is

    "If you avoided paying for this then you would not have to see this stupid message"

  13. That's ADORABLE. by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I love how the *AA are intentionally putting themselves out of business.

    There can be no other reason.

    Music sales are up, movies are still grossing record revenues, Netflix is successful, etc. They keep trying to tell us piracy is bad.

    No, piracy offers me a better product. No revoked keys, no work involved in playing my content, I can put it where I want, use it how I want, etc.i

    Fucking idiots.

  14. Easy: Rip before watching by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    If you still want to keep things above board (for the creators, not the leeching middlemen), just rip the disks before you watch them. Yeh, it's a good 5 minutes and a bit of a hassle, and totally illegal due to DMCA, but you never have to sit through any of the crap they shove on the disks these days again, like these warnings, trailers, or flashy menus. Obviously pirates don't have this problem.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    1. Re:Easy: Rip before watching by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If you still want to keep things above board (for the creators, not the leeching middlemen), just rip the disks before you watch them. Yeh, it's a good 5 minutes and a bit of a hassle, and totally illegal due to DMCA, but you never have to sit through any of the crap they shove on the disks these days again, like these warnings, trailers, or flashy menus. Obviously pirates don't have this problem.

      Twenty seconds is still less than 5 minutes, but they are working on it.

    2. Re:Easy: Rip before watching by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that there will ONLY be those two 10 second announcements. There will probably still be another 5 minutes of crap on top of that.

      I'm currently re-watching Life on DVD, every time I turn on the DVD players I have to sit through minutes of unskippable (un-fast-forwardable) warnings and trailers, and they are on the start of every disc in the set.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  15. Consider this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Consider an open hardware project consisting of an ARM board booting from flash and running Linux which has the sole purpose of playing DVDs and Bluerays. Couple it with a power supply, BD drive, and chassis; and the genie of I-can-do-whatever-I-damn-well-please-with-my-disk is forever out of the bottle. Who here would buy such a thing?

    1. Re:Consider this... by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody, because the DVD and Blu-ray panels would sue the vendors into oblivion for patent infringement.

      That is how the DRM is enforced at a legal level. Patent the algorithm and require you to implement DRM to get a license. No DRM, no patent license.

  16. "Educate" the public? by msobkow · · Score: 1

    You mean senselessly beat and pound on the people who already got the message. As futile and pointless as a preacher screaming to the congregation that they need to "accept Jesus" when they're already in the church.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  17. I has a policy by Swampash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever I see an unskippable copyright warning on a DVD I legitimately own, the movie industry owes me another movie for free. I can't help it if the MPAA just keeps on breaching my policy.

  18. If they had half a braincell at ICE... by shades66 · · Score: 1

    If they really want to educate people then at least make it interesting rather than 20 seconds of dullness. Something like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MgZqMx-qWw maybe? (From The IT Crowd)

    --
    ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
  19. Re:Twenty Seconds? by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Twenty seconds...that's too much for you to suffer through?

    Fuck, get a drink or take a piss. You probably won't have time to do either.

    If this is the level of inconvenience that would cause anyone to get upset, they need to see a shrink because they have issues.

    20 seconds might be plenty of time for you to do all of that, including fuck, but the rest of us usually sit down to watch a movie after we've done all that (and I for one, last a lot longer than your few seconds... ask your Mom when you see her Sunday).

    I'd prefer not to sit there for 20 seconds to be annoyed by messages that, by PAYING FOR THE MOVIE, do not actually apply to me.

  20. Advertising Piracy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the government to advertise piracy. This is a lot like putting up a sign "Wet Paint -- Don't Touch" and we all know what people will do.

    Similarly, in Utah (under President Clinton) they created the Escallante National Monument in order to "preserve" it. Of course, nobody lived out there and the only people who went out into the area that became the monument was a few ranchers and red-necks. After they announced the monument, 1,000's of people headed down there and now it is a major tourist attraction. The volunteer fire department in Boulder Utah just about went broke because drunk drivers would drive off Devils Backbone (narrow one lane road, 500 feet down on either side) and they would have to haul the cars out. Property in the area jumped from $1,000/acre to $50,000/acre. (Interestingly enough much of which was purchased by Gibb Smith who was a major figure in the Utah Wilderness Alliance and the Sierra Club not long before the national monument was announced.) All in all, declaring the national monument was perhaps the worst thing that could happen to preserve the "wildernessness" of the land itself.

    Putting an ad at the beginning of every movie that says: "Don't pirate me" simply says: "Pirate Me" or: "You could have downloaded this from the Pirate Bay for Free."

    1. Re:Advertising Piracy .... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Leave it to the government to advertise piracy. This is a lot like putting up a sign "Wet Paint -- Don't Touch" and we all know what people will do.

      I would have thought you had an unassailable argument, but then you picked the one example of a sign that actually works.

    2. Re:Advertising Piracy .... by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      Leave it to the government to advertise piracy. This is a lot like putting up a sign "Wet Paint -- Don't Touch" and we all know what people will do.

      I would have thought you had an unassailable argument, but then you picked the one example of a sign that actually works.

      s/Wet Paint/Fresh Cement/g;

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
  21. what they should do - by RichMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    put a one time use web entered data key at the end of OPTIONAL previews for a 50% discount on a future movie ticket (only valid on some movies, like the ones the expect to bomb anyways and need extra audience).

    This says a) thanks for buying the disk, and b) thanks for watching the OPTIONAL previews.

    It would make the buyer feel good and it would get them extra audience for normally losy movies. And it would get them web registrations of users. ((I hate doing the registration stuff, so mine would end up unused or I would pass the number to someone else, but I would still feel good about it rather than the current system))

    1. Re:what they should do - by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they would have to individually master each disk or find some way to do that with a part of the disc which would drastically increase the cost.

      Blue rays have some way of identifying every disk so this is possible. Not quite sure how it works.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:what they should do - by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Dunno how they actually do it, but I'd include a small piece of writable material on a fixed spot (or better yet: 2 fixed spots). This can be written with the serial after pressing. Be sure to set up a system to replace the disks after the customer finds out the disks won't play after a couple of years (because the writable stuff is not forever)

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:what they should do - by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This is innovative and brilliant, and so the movie industry will find some reason that they can't do it because it would take too much effort.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  22. Re:Twenty Seconds? by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are actively punishing people for purchasing. The length of time of the punishment is not relevant. Pirating it is the only sane option. Paying for punishment is something only a few fetishists participate in.

  23. Pirating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't feel morally righteous or justified in downloading pirated shows, but it's just so damn convenient.

  24. Re:Twenty Seconds? by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah... because getting upset over principles when it is just easier to settle for less and wait 20 seconds is so much easier.

    The more you are willing to settle for shit the more you will find you are eating it more often.

  25. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    It's too much for me when it's completely pointless, yes. Quit wasting my time.

    "What, 2 minutes too much for you? There are 24 hours in a day!"

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  26. Re:Meta: weird by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Good enough to post twice. I think I will post it to my facebook status... :)

  27. I like my VHS tapes by ehud42 · · Score: 3
    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
  28. How about a California constitutional amendment by reg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish someone would craft a carefully worded Proposition for California which would make any unskipable content on media which is sold or rented unconstitional... Something about not being allowed to accuse people of crimes without evidence that they are at least thinking of committing the crime.

    It would make for such a fun round of election ads - the more the studios argue that it is a good thing the more the population would be reminded just how irritating these warnings are.

    Regards,
    -Jeremy

    1. Re:How about a California constitutional amendment by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      This should not have been modded Funny - it should have been modded Insightful. California is a massive economy whose laws often affect policy across the entire US. It's also one of the easier states to take mandates directly to the voter (of course, that's helped contribute to their budget problems, and the weird warnings about cancer you see at Starbucks, but hey, it will be a Good Thing (tm) (R) in this case!).

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
  29. 20 seconds to sit through a warning. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enough time to set up a torrent download for the movie and let the regret of purchasing set in.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:20 seconds to sit through a warning. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Who spends that kind of time setting up downloads. That's what Couch Potato is for - when I find a movie is coming out that I want to see, I just cue it up. Plex then shows me all the new movies that the system has downloaded. It's like a new releases bar for my TV.

      Oh, sure, we buy the discs from time to time - it's both legal and makes for a nice backup. Very few of the DVDs and BRs we have purchased in the past 2 years area even out of their shrink wrap.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:20 seconds to sit through a warning. by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Heck, with a fairly popular movie, a modern bittorrent client, and a decent connection you can go from starting the download to watching the movie in less time than that.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  30. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jaymz666 · · Score: 2

    Let's turn on the disc changer, shall we? OK, what DVD is in spot #1? 20 seconds..... plus whatever other load time there is.
    Ok, disc #2? Hmmm, what about #3?....

    What a waste of time for zero gain, only pissing off the general public.

  31. Another reason by J'raxis · · Score: 2

    As if I needed another reason to never purchase content made by these companies. So now they're effectively making pirated copies not just cheaper, but better, too.

  32. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twenty seconds...that's too much for you to suffer through?

    That's 20 seconds, AFTER the 45 or so for the damn thing to boot up, 10 to figure out that there's a disc shoved in it, AFTER 10 minutes of previews for "coming soon" titles that came and went 3 years ago, BEFORE the half-dozen splash screens from all the various production and distribution companies involved with the movie, etc, etc. Conveying the EXACT SAME DAMN information that I saw when I played the last movie, and the one before that, and the one before that.

  33. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know a number of professional Mistresses, there's more than a few people who pay for punishment.

    Though, mostly, it's negotiated in advance what is acceptable. Why is there no safe word for all this rubbish?

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  34. Re:Are they trying to make people stop buying DVDs by phaedrus5001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe this is the goal. If people stop buying the DVDs, then there will be no one to rip them and upload the files to The Pirate Bay or some other torrent site. Piracy problem solved!

    --
    "It's a trick. Get an axe."
  35. Especially irritating for foreigners by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not in the USA, yet I have to sit through FBI warnings on every DVD or Blu-ray I purchase. Yes, they're impressive official seals and look very threatening, but the FBI has absolutely no jurisdiction in this country. Why on earth don't they edit the bloody things out?!

  36. We've had these for a while in Australia by multiben · · Score: 2

    So I'm sorry because I know what's ahead of you. And you know, it's not the waiting that is annoying. It is the fact that I bought a DVD with *my* money thereby (at least I believed) owning it, and yet I am being forced to watch something I would prefer to skip. Again and again and again. If you are one of the people here who thinks it won't be annoying, then speak to me in a year's time when you've seen the same damn message 500 times.

    To the idiots who decided to put these messages up in the first place: Nothing makes me want to pirate more than these messages. I am not pro-pirate, but you are making your product *worse* than I can get for free. Why make people who are doing the right thing already sit through a bunch of your preachy bullshit?

    1. Re:We've had these for a while in Australia by ausrob · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it *starts* with these warnings, then it extends to ads you can't skip. Australia's put up with this for the better part of a decade now.

  37. Thanks! by the_fat_kid · · Score: 2

    Gosh, I feel smarter already.

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  38. Cheap movies used to do this right by Tridus · · Score: 2

    My old copy of Demolition Man on DVD has this stuff right. You put it in, the movie starts. There's minimal nonsense. No previews, no menus, just movie. The movie is the only thing I care about anyway, so this is great.

    These days they're just annoying. As usual Hollywood is working hard to make the pirate version superior to the purchased one. They must be taking lessons from Ubisoft in how to chase off paying customers.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Cheap movies used to do this right by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Disney movies (some of them anyway) do this too. Except first you sit through a little screen telling you that this DVD has fastplay technology. That's right, apparently just playing the damn movie is a technology now.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Cheap movies used to do this right by Asmodae · · Score: 1

      Except, the fastest way to play is to skip fastplay which plays a 'selection of previews followed by the feature presentation'... so if you skip it, you get straight to menu, then play starts the move, no previews no muss. You still have the stupid FBI warnings, but you've skipped about 5-8 minutes of garbage that way.

  39. Ah Yes, Those Threats From Foriegn Countries. by rueger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm always amused that every DVD I rent or buy in Canada has stern warnings from police forces in other countries. The day when the RCMP has their own warning before the movie is the day when I'll take it seriously.

    Especially since a hell of a lot of those DVDs are pressed in Canada.

  40. Forget the time and the irritation, I always rip by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Anybody with a laptop knows it is far better to rip it and then play it back from low power silent storage than haul around easy to scratch (illegal to backup) discs that loudly whirl around wasting electricity. Plus there are all these devices without DVD or blueray on them...

    If somebody sold software to rip legally purchased discs so you could easily access them... they would be shutdown.... unless it is music, where iTunes proved highly successful at doing just that.

  41. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Tridus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes. It's my money, and as the customer I demand they not put bullshit in just to make me suffer through it.

    If they can't manage that, I'll gladly not give them my money. Capitalism is grand.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  42. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You've just spent more effort and time typing a response to somebody you don't agree with than it would have took you to simply sit through the annoying message and not worry about it. The mentality behind people who will do almost no end of legwork to get around or avoid something that they find inconvenient, but is ultimately less of an imposition on anybody, including themselves, than the effort that one would likely have to go through to avoid it is nothing less than baffling.

    When you can download an entire pirated movie in less than the time it takes to sit through the warnings about piracy, then maybe you might have a point. Heck, unless it is really mainstream it probably takes you longer than that just to find a place that has a copy of it for you to download.

  43. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

    2 minutes is 120 seconds. Not 20.

    That's not what I meant.

    It's just pointless nonsense. And whether 20 seconds is annoying to someone or not will vary from person to person.

    I'm compelled to wonder how you deal with things like traffic lights where you don't happen to see anybody else around.

    At least traffic lights have a somewhat valid reason for being there. This is just... pointless.

    Pirated versions have no annoying commercials, you can sit around and do other things while you're downloading, you don't have to go anywhere, and you don't have to pay for anything. What's the point of these commercials?

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  44. Re:Twenty Seconds? by rhysweatherley · · Score: 2

    Twenty seconds...that's too much for you to suffer through?

    Fuck, get a drink or take a piss. You probably won't have time to do either.

    And then come back and find the damn disk is still waiting at the "Select English or 40 Languages You Don't Speak" screen waiting for you to hit the OK button. Seriously, is it really so hard to detect the language I've already set on my Blu-Ray player and use that by default?

    In any case, if "insert disk, go do something else, then watch movie" becomes a problem, I'm sure the studios will "fix" that by adding a EULA click to the Copyright warning screens.

  45. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You've just spent more effort and time typing a response to somebody you don't agree with than it would have took you to simply sit through the annoying message and not worry about it.

    But... what if he likes replying to people? Perhaps it's more enjoyable than watching pointless commercials? There is a difference.

    When you can download an entire pirated movie in less than the time it takes to sit through the warnings about piracy

    Except that you can do other things while it's downloading, you don't have to pay, and there are no commercials. Furthermore, you don't have to leave the house.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  46. Totally Absurd by Maltheus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I finally got a Bluray player last November and although I have the money to easily afford any movie I want, and would prefer to have the highest bitrate, I gave up after several movies in a row took about 5-10 minutes to start up. I even had one rental that went on for over 20 minutes. Hell, the studio identifications alone take 5 minutes. I may be willing to give the studios my money, but I can't afford to give them my time. I will not pay $40 to be annoyed when I can have the annoyless versions for free.

    This puts the final nail in the Bluray coffin for me. I was on the fence and now, I will simply never buy another. Congratulations movie studios! You really know how to sell a product there.

  47. The pirate product is the superior product by DrHappyAngry · · Score: 2

    Way to go guys. Make the versions available on bittorrent sites that much better than what you can buy. This will really encourage people to shell out their money to sit through warnings, ads and previews. Maybe if they looked at what makes people want the pirated version you'd actually be able to sell it. A) No ads, warnings, previews for movies I don't care about. B) Less clicks and handing out of personal information and jumping through hoops to get a copy. C) They play on anything, or can be transcoded easily to play on a specific device if they don't already. I'm not locked into viewing this just on a limited set of devices that I'm allowed to play it on. D) Movies are just overpriced as it is. Things are supposed to become cheaper over time (if you account for inflation) not become more expensive. E) Most movies are not very good, and nobody remembers them a year later, anyways.

  48. Obligatory Car Analogy by codegen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its like police with radar guns on the side of the highway stopping everybody going under the speed limit to remind them about the penalty for speeding.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    1. Re:Obligatory Car Analogy by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's like the till at your local grocery store saying "GROWING YOUR OWN PRODUCE IS A CRIME. YOU ARE DEPRIVING FARMERS OF THEIR LIVELIHOOD BY GROWING VEGETABLES." for 20 seconds before the cashier can begin to scan your produce.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  49. It's not about piracy by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's about making sure they public understand that "Intellectual Property" means what they think it means. They're trying (and outside of /. succeeding I think) to control the discourse and vocabulary surrounding works of art.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  50. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

    I don't see where he mentioned pirating content there...

    But still, you automatically assumed that was the case.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  51. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    I presume, then, that you perceive of lineups at a cashier as actively punishing people who choose to purchase items in the store instead of shoplift?

    What? That's more out of necessity than anything else. You're not even considering intent.

    What is the point of these commercials? There is none; they're simply needless.

    But in the case of DVD's, you'll actually spend orders of magnitude more time and effort pirating it than you would have spent simply sitting through the warning. I trust you realize what such a choice of actions makes you look like.

    You're not taking a number of factors into account: you don't have to pay (possibly a big reason here), you can do other things while it's downloading, you don't have to go anywhere to get the movie (assuming you did), and the warnings are nonexistent. The second one makes the whole "hassle" pretty much nonexistent. The fact that some people choose to pirate the content shows that they probably do not find buying it worthwhile.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  52. Re:Twenty Seconds? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google your DVD player model. IIRC my old players 'safeword' was hitting three buttons on the front at the same time. Most of the non-name brand players have this 'feature'. New one came from the factory with noskip disabled.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  53. Re:Twenty Seconds? by yoctology · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Twenty seconds of clock time is not the same as twenty seconds of human time.
    Imagine disturbing a heart surgeon for twenty random seconds in the middle of heart surgery.
    Imagine disturbing for twenty seconds a poet reading a poem to a thousand people.
    Imagine disturbing for five seconds making love to your SO.
    The twenty seconds is not the thing, it's the destruction of the movie watching mindset and the hatred that colors thinking for far more than twenty seconds after.the "pick up that can!" message.

  54. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If your reaction time is over a second you should not be driving.

  55. Which brings me to a question... by phorm · · Score: 1

    I have a 5-disc DVD Sony DVD player. I've had it for ages, and it's pissed me off to no end with the unskippable ads or warnings. The only reason I haven't replaced it is because it's also the head for surround-sound. My current plan is to toss the damn thing (or maybe inflict it upon some other poor soul from ebay) and buy a separate surround-sound head unit + a blu-ray player.

    Finding a DVD player that doesn't have unskippables or region-locks is pretty easy, usually the cheaper brands work best.

    Does anyone know of a decent blu-ray player that
    a) Doesn't take 10000001 years to load
    b) Doesn't prevent skipping the threats and ads sections
    c) Preferable doesn't region-block
    d) Is generally affordable (but if it does all the above, that's more important than cheap)

  56. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Uhyve · · Score: 2

    Yeah, there seems to be a whole lot of anonymous cowards jumping on people for piracy and starting childish arguments in defence of ICE in this article. Starting to get weird.

  57. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are actively punishing people for purchasing.

    In my case, I would estimate that they have cut their business from me by more than 50% with their warnings and other abuses. Every time I watch a DVD I am reminded of how much this industry detests me, a paying customer.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  58. Re:Twenty Seconds? by skywire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a human being, you are astonishingly clueless about human psychology. If the cashiers at your favourite store were given new instructions that, upon completion of the transaction with the person before you, they were to stand motionless holding up some inane sign about shoplifting for a full twenty seconds before beginning to assist you, I daresay you would soon find another store to frequent.

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  59. Ugh by sootman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Up until the mid-1990s, it was pretty rare for a movie to hit the magical $100-million mark. Then, Disney animated features started doing that pretty regularly, and after that, most big-budget films started hitting that mark pretty consistently as well.

    In 2002, Spider-Man became the first movie to hit $100 million in its opening weekend. Ten years later (almost to the day) The Avengers became the first movie to hit TWO hundred million dollars on its opening weekend, and one short week later, Wikipedia tells me that its box office grosses are THREE QUARTERS OF A BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS.

    Tell me, again, how piracy is hurting the industry?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Ugh by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Avengers will make a loss. All Hollywood movies make a loss. Profit is not allowed, because it means Hollywood has to pay people royalties.

      Hollywood Accounting

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Ugh by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      All movie piracy has done is move some of the 1% into the 2%.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    3. Re:Ugh by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      With Hollywood accounting (very similar to music label accounting) you can guarantee it will never make a profit.

  60. UOPs must die by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been saying this for ten years now, but User Operation Prohibitions, just like region restrictions, on equipment that people own are simply not acceptable.

    I have seen so many DVDs with unskippable previews, FBI warnings (on region 4 DVDs no less) and of course the stupid "You wouldn't steal a car.." campaign. No wonder this depiction is so accurate.

    That said, I was pleasantly surprised when one DVD I rented recently had just one message that lasted about 5 seconds and simply said (paraphrasing) "For supporting the movie industry, THANK YOU". Presumably this is an attempt to give warm fuzzies (positive reinforcement) for not pirating (rather than punishment for those who do). Of course that could always end up on a ripped copy anyway but that's not the piont...

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  61. I've seen the light! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    I was such a bad, naughty person before, but now I will bow to be spanked by the MPAA and the government!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  62. Re:Twenty Seconds? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    But in the case of DVD's, you'll actually spend orders of magnitude more time and effort pirating it than you would have spent simply sitting through the warning. I trust you realize what such a choice of actions makes you look like.

    You aren't making an apples to apples comparison. You are comparing the amount of time it takes to acquire the illicit copy to sitting through the warning. However, DVDs don't magically appear in front of you. You have to go to a store to buy them, which includes travel time to a retail store, shopping, and going back, which takes a significant amount of time. In regards to effort, this will typically involve money, and that money is usually acquired as the result of a certain amount of labor.

    A better comparison would be to the time it takes to open the file.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  63. Re:Twenty Seconds? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Rude, impatient, self important jerks.

    That makes no sense. Why would the Hollywood executives that shoveled this shit down our throats complain about this?

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  64. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not an inconvenience - it's a foot in the door.

    First it's the little warning. Then it's the unskippable lecture. Then it's a required political 'lesson' - starting with something safe, like a reminder that all men must register with Selective Service. And then it becomes required that you cannot rip a legitimate copy without those government-imposed blurbs.

    Bad enough there are 20 minutes of unskippable trailers on the friggin' thing, which is why I rip the things in the first place.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  65. Re:Twenty Seconds? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get married and call me back

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  66. "Only" 20 Seconds? Wrong. by Azure+Flash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I skimmed through the comments and I'd like to answer those who have the opinion that it's "just" 20 seconds, that you should get over it, that it's harder to pirate it so it's illogical.

    First of all, it's not the length of time that is disturbing to me. I'm not a machine, I don't perceive every second as exactly the same amount of time. Sometimes I play a game and 3 hours go by as if it had only been 15 minutes. Sometimes I wait 15 minutes and it seems like it's been an hour. That 20 seconds of unskippable messages is disturbing because it affects the experience of watching the movie. I don't get irritated because I'm wasting 20 seconds of my incredibly precious time; I get irritated because the mega-corporation which produced this movie added an unnecessary step to watching the movie.

    This isn't about how long or how short the unskippable message is. It's about the fact that it's there at all. If you accept the 20 seconds, you're saying it's okay if someone stops you for 20 seconds and makes you say "you're the boss, I'm following your orders, I won't disobey you". How would you feel if every time you went to pump gas, someone stopped you for 20 seconds and told you "it's our gas, don't steal it, alright? Swear it. Swear you won't try to steal it". And then every time you go to the grocery store, before entering, you have to stop for 20 seconds and say "I understand the food inside isn't my property. I won't try to steal it. I'll pay for it." This is what you're agreeing to if you're okay with those unskippable notices. What makes you think it won't become 30 seconds, and then eventually 40? A minute? A minute is nothing compared to 2 hours, after all. You should be able to live through that, right?

    Long story short: it's not the length of the delay that's disturbing, it's the gratuitous addition of an obstacle that serves no purpose (pirates won't see it, ordinary people will just do something else until the menu appears), and it's the oppression of people's freedom to reaffirm their submission to the authorities.

  67. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    I can start up a myth frontend from being completely unplugged in that amount of time. Once started, I won't have to worry about any of this nonsense no matter how many DVDs I might want to start watching.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  68. Re:Twenty Seconds? by denmarkw00t · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the Love of Dog, someone mod this anon up!

  69. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    But in the case of DVD's, you'll actually spend orders of magnitude more time and effort pirating it than you would have spent simply sitting through the warning.

    Apples/Oranges. Pirating a DVD is the action-equivalent of going out to buy one legitimately.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  70. Language by FirephoxRising · · Score: 2

    Yes, why cant it detect the set language, crap HDMI allows all sorts of data and control, surely the player can detect what it, the receiver, TV and other devices are set to and select that language automatically.

    1. Re:Language by yotto · · Score: 1

      You seem to think all that technology is there to help you.

      With HDMI, my Xbox won't turn on until the TV's on and set to its input. It never did that when I used component cables. How is HDMI better, again?

    2. Re:Language by Tukz · · Score: 1

      You can disable that feature, you know.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  71. Next coming to Starbucks near you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Single snotball in your coffee... that's too much for you to suffer through?

    Fuck, just scoop it out with a spoon. You probably won't even notice any taste change.

    If this is the level of inconvenience that would cause anyone to get upset, they need to see a shrink because they have issues.

  72. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Twenty seconds is longer than the average new movie's plot line.

  73. encouraging pirating by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

    I don't pirate Blu-rays or DVD's, I actually purchase any that I want. (I have a couple of hundred at least). However an additional 20 seconds of forced notices at the front will certainly encourage me to rethink my approach. If you want to educate me, don't try and do it by pissing me off or I will most definitely take the opposite view of what your trying to push.

    1. Re:encouraging pirating by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Maybe they decided that they could make more money on piracy lawsuits than on selling movies.......

      Remember that these are the same people who put adds touting the high performance of blue-ray on blue-ray disks..........

  74. Re:Twenty Seconds? by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You think that because you don't understand what principles are .

    Irrespective of piracy, the exchange of consideration (paying for the shit) and the receipt of physical product (the fucking dvd) should allow one peaceful enjoyment reasonably expected under the spirit of copyright (those fancy legal entitlements).

    I did my part paying for the DVD, and my family owns quite a large number. When Big Media sits there and thinks they can dictate how I enjoy my newly acquired legal rights to enjoy the DVD (the legal agreement between me and Big Media constructed by copyright laws), they have gone too far and become unreasonable.

    They have no rational, ethical, or legal position to force me to enjoy the content in any way. That means I can media shift it, apply all the weird filters I want, and even watch the chapters out of order. It especially means I am not forced to watch any extraneous content they may have added.

    When they figure out they can't actually control me and I might not act the way they want to (sit through all the bullshit before they want to play the fucking movie), they become abhorrent assholes by creating something called Prohibited User Operations. Really? Prohibit what mother fuckers? You mean I can pay $10 for the DVD and still have prohibitions which is completely contrary to the idea of peaceful enjoyment of one's property?

    Now when they realize that I can bypass it and start creating laws like the DMCA and suing people in their delusional states they become enemies of the People.

    So.... yeah.... I can bitch and moan about shit like this and base my discontent entirely on principles and not the fact I am inconvenienced by 20 additional seconds. It's the principles involved.

    If you can't understand that, then move to someplace like Afghanistan or Pakistan for awhile, because Americans have bitched, moaned, and bled for principles in this country since it was founded.

    Afghanistan will be an easy fit for you. "Sheesh.. what's with all these rude, impatient, self important jerks complaining about the Taliban forcing us to have beards? I mean all it takes is sitting back and doing nothing! How easy was that?"

  75. It should be obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DVD's are a valuable means of delivering advertisements along with product. However, in order for the ads to be valuable, the users must be forced to watch them. So, making the content unskipable is a major selling point of the format to content producers.

    The fact that consumers hate it does not matter, consumers will buy it anyway since there are no ad-free alternatives at all (the force of law ensures that there are no other options, and it works perfectly).

    1. Re:It should be obvious by FreshlyShornBalls · · Score: 1

      consumers will buy it anyway since there are no ad-free alternatives at all

      You're ALMOST right. There IS an ad-free alternative: don't buy anything and--dare I say it--don't pirate it, either. Just don't watch.

      You got the beginning spot on, though: consumers will buy it anyway. Just like everything else, we're at the mercy of the majority and the more "they" put up with, the more we have to, as well.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:It should be obvious by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I disagree... DVDs are a valuable means of delivering data to my media server, which then copies off the bits it wants and leaves the rest. As such, DVDs are a backup medium these days, more than anything else.

  76. really guys? really? by yodleboy · · Score: 1

    unskippable content is nothing new and hasn't seemed to do squat. Childrens movies/shows are the worst. It's not just an FBI warning, its unskippable previews, unskippable ads for various crap, unskippable commercials for various childrens networks. I gave up. Every new DVD gets ripped, stripped to menus and movie and reburned before the kids ever see it. less than 10 minutes spent up front = hours saved at viewings. Of course now we've converted all our movies to MP4 and have them on a proper media server so discs are just a delivery method now days.

    Anyway, I fail to see how MORE unskippable "education" is going to discourage anyone at this point.

    1. Re:really guys? really? by marxz · · Score: 1

      +1 I've set this up for both my sisters on their media centres because they were just so sick and tired of kids DVD's they bought for their children having 5 minutes or even more of unskippable advertisements for toys they don't want their kids to have (because they already have lockers full of crap they don't play with) and shows they do not want them to watch

  77. Glad ive decided to stop buying stuff... by Mistakill · · Score: 1

    Sure, ill rent it now n then... but they can go to hell if they think I will put up with this on something i OWN

    And anyone who says 'oh but you down own it, you own a license' can go to hell...

    Imagine the uproar if you got told AFTER you just bought a car, no you cant loan it to your friend/family, you cant use it on roads not approved by the manufacturer, and every time you got in, you had to watch a 20 second thing on why its important to use X brand parts (oh, and btw, no you cant change the colour/add in a new stereo/seat cushion) because 'its a license to use the car, not ownership)

  78. Educate the public? by InspectorGadget1964 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that translates to "Winning the hearts and minds..."

  79. Re:20s? Could be a lot worse by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    This is new. It starts a new bunch of messages _after_ you select 'play movie' from the menu.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  80. That'll work by Bogtha · · Score: 1

    The very last DVD I bought, years ago, had unstoppable trailers. I haven't bought a DVD since, on principle.

    Good job, movie execs. You've made your products even less palatable compared to your black market competitors. Not only do the people downloading illegally not have to pay, they also get a better product that doesn't force them to sit through this crap. I'm sure this plan won't backfire at all.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  81. Re:Twenty Seconds? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but in this case, there's a cartell of grocery suppliers, and any store that wishes to sell groceries must hold up the the sign for 20 seconds. And if they don't, the U.S. government will kick in the doors with guns.

  82. Re:Twenty Seconds? by deek · · Score: 1

    What you've said is very true. To be fair, though, you are acting somewhat ironically by gravely insulting the person whom you accuse of being clueless about human psychology.

  83. Re:Twenty Seconds? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    The problem is that if just one person acts on principle like you describe, he'll get the downsides of his protest but ultimately will be ineffective. I.e., irrational.

    Boycotts need some particular critical mass to be effective.

  84. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Not putting up with arbitrary useless nonsense is a more compelling principle in this country.

    All this measure does is degrade the user experience and devalue the content. Getting rid of this kind of nonsense makes a DVD more valuable. Those of us that have actively sought to remove this nonsense probably account for ten times the revenue of corporate shills such as yourself.

    Nonsense free content is much more valuable and more prone to beget more paid consumption.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  85. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    20 seconds is not a big deal.. Don't compare it to 2 minutes, or even 1. It's TWENTY freakin' seconds

    If your yearly income is 1 million dollars, that 20 seconds is worth about $600.

    If 20 seconds is too long for you to wait for something that is of no use to you, I'm compelled to wonder how you deal with things like traffic lights where you don't happen to see anybody else around.

    Well if traffic lights were of no use to me, that might be relevant. But as they are in fact incredibly useful in preventing me and others from colliding in a twisted pile of metal and glass, I find them quite handy. 20 seconds is not a high price for me to pay when my physical well-being is at stake. If I have to wait 20 seconds before a soda machine kicks me out a soda, I'm moving on to something else.
    The value of my time is for me to determine, not you, and not every 20 seconds of time is of equal value. When I sit to watch a movie, I'm trying to enjoy myself, suspend my disbelief, and lose myself in a false reality for a little while. That 20 seconds of disruption, in which I'm pressured to drop back out of my delusion and face "serious issues", is far more costly to my viewing experience than just straight time.

    Besides, those warnings are a fucking joke anyhow. Seriously, I've actually read them before and I've seen movies slip shit into the fine print like "Are you really reading this? Why?" Almost nobody bothers to read them, and back during the 80's I knew multiple people with a wall of VHS tapes they pirated from rented movies, all complete with the FBI warning. It doesn't educate shit, what it does is let the movie studios claim that by watching the movie you have agreed to the license terms because you were forced to read the warning.

  86. Re:Twenty Seconds? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are actively punishing people for purchasing. The length of time of the punishment is not relevant. Pirating it is the only sane option. Paying for punishment is something only a few fetishists participate in.

    Yeah, let me get this straight...there are people not buying movies, but by putting an annoying screen on the movies people like me buy, they plan to somehow cause the other guys to start buying them.

    The business plan of the studios that signed up to participate is literally:

    1. Annoy your paying customers.

    2. ???

    3. Profit!!!

    What actually happened is that they finally managed to make me stop buying movies. There were many close calls before, but this is finally the last straw.

  87. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Entropius · · Score: 1

    It takes me more than twenty seconds to fuck, thank you very much.

  88. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Entropius · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I find a dominatrix that accepts payment to show people FBI anti-piracy warnings, then I will have seen everything and Rule 34 will be dead.

  89. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Entropius · · Score: 1

    If that happens you'll see a growth in home gardens and hunting.

  90. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Do you?

    Fire up torrent client, go make dinner, come back and watch movie.

  91. R or D, doesn't matter by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's mostly just the Democratic Party of the United States that is bought and paid for by Hollywood.

    The No Electronic Theft Act and Digital Millennium Copyright Act were passed under a Republican-controlled House and a Republican-controlled Senate.

    1. Re:R or D, doesn't matter by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It's mostly just the Democratic Party of the United States that is bought and paid for by Hollywood.

      The No Electronic Theft Act and Digital Millennium Copyright Act were passed under a Republican-controlled House and a Republican-controlled Senate.

      It shocks me that there are STILL people who believe there is any difference between them any more...

    2. Re:R or D, doesn't matter by sco08y · · Score: 1

      It's mostly just the Democratic Party of the United States that is bought and paid for by Hollywood.

      The No Electronic Theft Act and Digital Millennium Copyright Act were passed under a Republican-controlled House and a Republican-controlled Senate.

      Both of which had heavy support from the Democrats as well. The DMCA actually has plenty of provisions that are quite reasonable, like safe harbor. You also didn't mention the V-chip that Bill Clinton advocated, or Tipper Gore's crusades against filthy lyrics.

      But I said bought and paid for, and that matters on the controversial issues, not the ones in which Washington conventional wisdom is simply wrong. And the fact is that Hollywood is third after trial lawyers and unions as donors to the Democrats. But you can prove me wrong, just name all those a-list actors, directors, film execs or people in related businesses like music who are big fans and donors to the GOP.

  92. Re:Twenty Seconds? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative
    In MythTV, hit (M)enu, then select Root menu.

    Then rip the DVD and watch it later without the garbage.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  93. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Completion? They'd hold up the sign before completing the damn thing, so you'd stand there for 20 seconds thinking "Can I just please fucking pay already?".

  94. Re:Twenty Seconds? by kbdd · · Score: 2
    I am in the same boat. After replacing the DVD players with Blu-Ray players, they are now unused and I find other forms of entertainment.

    I guess a warning would not be so bad if I could skip it like I did with the good old tapes. I get so particularly irritated when the studios have the guts of preventing me from skipping over the stupid warnings.

    Some people believe that success can be derived from annoying your customers. I thought we were beyond that. Apparently not.

  95. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Twenty seconds...that's too much for you to suffer through?

    That's a hell of a marketing slogan.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  96. Unlike copyrights, patents expire. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Patent the algorithm and require you to implement DRM to get a license.

    Patents on 1997 inventions run out in five years.

  97. Workaround by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Informative

    We have the same stuff on french DVD, thought not on all of them : I suspect they are not mandatory. However, there is a workaround. Selecting France's french gives me the lengthy antipiracy warning, but I skip it if I select Belgian french.

  98. Re:Twenty Seconds? by omfgnosis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've just spent more effort and time typing a response to somebody you don't agree with than it would have took you to...

    But... what if he likes replying to people? Perhaps it's more enjoyable than...

    This is easily the best exchange I've ever read on Slashdot.

  99. Mod this up... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    ......

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  100. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Adriax · · Score: 1

    Like how phobias are infinite in variety, rule34 is a recursive rule. The instant you think you'll completed it, someone will create porn of you completing your rule 34 collection.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  101. Re:Twenty Seconds? by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Yes, but they don't think of it that way.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  102. Sorry, but no by davmoo · · Score: 1

    And I'll continue to rip my legitimately purchased DVDs and Blu-Rays to my hard drive, removing this (and all other) forced content and previews. And the MPAA and FBI, and ilk like them, can shove their heads up their asses. If I want to play my discs in my toaster oven I will do so, and I don't give even one single flying fuck what they think about it.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Sorry, but no by shentino · · Score: 1

      Legally you'd probably be in the clear too.

      Nintendo v. Galoob established the right to make private derived works.

  103. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... how you deal with things like traffic lights where you don't happen to see anybody else around.

    I figure I'm smarter than the traffic light. Late at night, when there are no other cars/headlights in sight, and when I have good sight lines in all directions, then I treat traffic lights like 4-way stop sign intersections.

  104. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    They long ago cut their business from me by 100%, and that's where it will stay.

    --
    This space available.
  105. Re:Twenty Seconds? by lightknight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And people will find other sources. Many of the great falls in business can be attributed to not realizing the willingness of customers to go somewhere else when sufficiently annoyed. And that's the problem: once you piss of those customers, they stay pissed, for a long time.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  106. Re:Twenty Seconds? by lightknight · · Score: 1

    10 minutes to download it vs. 1 hour (round-trip) to buy one locally.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  107. Re:Twenty Seconds? by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes. It's my money, and as the customer I demand they not put bullshit in just to make me suffer through it.

    If they can't manage that, I'll gladly not give them my money. Capitalism is grand.

    I'm sorry citizen, but your right to not purchase something vital to a strong national economy and thus vital to national security has been superseded by the Commerce Clause.

    Please send Notary-witnessed copies of your US media purchase receipts for this past tax year for verification of your compliance with the Federal Individual Minimum Allowed Yearly Purchase (F-I-MAY-P) including payment for any difference between your receipt totals and the minimum allowable media purchase to the IRS.

    Remember, failure to prove compliance with the Federal Minimum Media Purchase requirements carries the same risk of felony prosecution and Federal imprisonment with the same level of severity and sentence-lengths as aggravated Federal income tax evasion.

    Failing to make your patriotic media purchases helps the terrorists club baby seals to death with other baby seals for fur they sell to pedophiles to photograph naked children on.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  108. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... go live in an economy where business caters to the customer.

    There, FTFY. YVW.

  109. Re:Twenty Seconds? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are you talking about? Everyone values their time differently, and not everyone values each second the same way. You seem to think others should value their time in a certain way, and that's not going to happen.

    This is absolutely pointless. This is a needless waste of time, and I don't think anyone enjoys it.

    Additionally, as others have said, it's also the principle of the matter. And if you keep stacking on negative after negative, it'll eventually be too much for people to stand.

    In a nutshell, it's more of a waste of time to gripe about it than to just put up with it. Either that, or go live in your own universe where everything caters to you.

    Their criticisms are valid no matter what you think. They're their own feelings.

    Oh, and there is an easy way: either pirate the movie, or don't buy it at all. To people sufficiently angered by this, they simply won't buy it.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  110. Education by Skrotus · · Score: 1

    Well it makes perfect sense to me, if you're still buying DVD's at this point you obviously don't know about piracy yet.

  111. Needs to be longer by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

    Can they make it longer? Maybe 1 minute 30 seconds in total? Just about enough to make a cup of coffee, prep some popcorn and visit the bathroom?

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  112. Re:Twenty Seconds? by http · · Score: 1

    I hate to put too fine a point on it, but that's incredibly insensitive and unrealistic.
    It's twenty seconds of legalese when people want to be entertained. It has no artistic value, and suggests that you're probably a criminal.
    And it's on EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DVD.

    Hey, I know, I'm going to come over to your house every night and yell at the top of my lungs that fellatio is a crime in some states. That should improve your sex lifre, right?

    --
    If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
    3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
  113. Threats of Prison Time Aren't a Deterrent! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you heard him right.

  114. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Carl's Junior vending machine in Idiocracy...

    "WARNING! Carl's Jr. Frowns Upon Vandalism"

    "Your kids are starving. Carl's Jr. believes no child should go hungry. You are an unfit mother. Your children will be placed in the custody of Carl's Jr."

    "Carl's Jr... Fuck You, I'm Eating."

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  115. Re:Twenty Seconds? by sjames · · Score: 1

    Twenty seconds of being threatened and treated like a thief when the very fact that I'm seeing it suggests I am nothing of the sort is just a bit rude, don't you think? Add in that they were so adamant about being able to threaten me whenever they like that they perverted the DVD spec and created a cartel to act as a bludgeon to keep manufacturers of DVD drives in line and just as a final insult, they tack the cost on to the DVDs and players so I have to PAY them to insult me.

    If they're going to give me the finger after I give them money, perhaps I should just give them the finger next time.

  116. Of course we need government warnings by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    An election is coming up here soon. The government IS dangerous

      I wish I could vote to limit copyright terms....

  117. Buy DVD == Criminal? by mar.kolya · · Score: 1

    Each time I watch a DVD I paid for they show be this black screen with words 'prison', 'illegal', 'fine'. I'll probably read though this text once or twice. After this - this screen will just affect my subconsciousness making very strong association from DVD I bought in Walmart with words 'prison', 'illegal', 'fine'. Result - I'll subconsciously feel guilty every time I watch a legally bought DVD and every time I even think about buying a DVD. Movie industry is putting great amount of effort to make their product subconsciously uncomfortable for people. The purpose of this move is a mystery.

  118. already done here... by marxz · · Score: 1

    at least with DVD's - one reason I now buy blurays as much as possible is not just the higher quality (and many are not even that) is that they don't, yet, have this (and, ironically, they are often cheaper than the DVD version).
    And if I have to buy a DVD it gets ripped, sans warnings and menu, and put on my media server.
    seriously I'll admit to torrenting a fair number of shows (all ones that aren't shown locally) but I have 3 whole shelfs on a bookcase full of legit DVD's and BluRays two deep two high (300+ at last count (that and a couple of thousand CD's accumulated over 20 years) and will pre order shows I know I like from viewing the torrents so odds on bet I'm one of their best customers....
    and I hate that these people treat me as their enemy - every time I'm forced to sit through these stupid "you wouldn't steal a car why steal this movie" shite on a DVD I've just coughed up real cash for another straw is added to the camels back that will eventually say "fsck you twunts"

  119. Oh good... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... an extra 20 seconds for me to get a soda before the movie starts. If you look at these little warnings as nothing more than extra time to grab your snacks they're not that bad. They don't think I'm going to actually sit in front of the TV actually watching their propaganda, do they? I do agree with other posters that they are more than a little insulting. I've paid for the DVD so it's obvious that I'm not a member of the population who they should be aiming these 20 seconds at. Surely the studios doesn't expect me to go to work tomorrow and tell all my coworkers about the riveting anti-piracy messages I saw last night. Or are they really that dumb?

    Sure extra junk like these messages are annoying but since they come at the beginning of the DVD before the actual feature begins, I find that they're pretty ignorable. The thing about the newer DVDs that really makes my blood boil is when you have to wait and wait and wait for a cursor move to be recognized while moving around the menus. The older DVDs that we own don't seem to impose these silly delays. Next on my list are the DVDs that seem to screw around with our players and turn on subtitles. Add to that those multisecond delays as you navigate through the menus to turn the darned things off and you're in a foul mood before the movie even begins.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  120. Re:Twenty Seconds? by sjames · · Score: 1

    It used to be 5 seconds, then 10, now it's 20. Then some of the trailers for movies that you have already seen or decided not to 2 years ago become unskippable as well.

    It will get longer and longer unless and until enough people say no loudly enough.

    Next up, when you press the start button on your new car, you get a 20 second lecture about DUI before the engine starts. If you don't gripe too loudly, they'll throw in a commercial or two.

  121. They're Just Pissing On Us.... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Without even having the decency of calling it rain. They think we're dumb enough for same sentence double speak... and for the vast majority they're probably right.

  122. 20 seconds? by cnaumann · · Score: 1

    When I put a Blu Ray disk in to the player the booting up and handshaking takes several minutes to complete. I could rewind an entire VHS tape in the time it takes to start working. What is it doing during all that time? I am betting that is has a LOT to do with anti-piracy measures. I would love to have a player that simply played the damn movie that I paid for, not that I am buying many Blu Rays there days.

    1. Re: 20 seconds? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I would love to have a player that simply played the damn movie that I paid for

      How will you get the movie studio's permission without all that extra work? Do you really think that you, as a consumer, have interests that matter? You get to be entertained at the content producers pleasure, when you have supplied them with a sufficient amount of money.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re: 20 seconds? by flytripper · · Score: 1

      Its the security key handshakes between the devices, player and screen. It annoys me to no end.

  123. Re:Twenty Seconds? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point was that 20 seconds isn't actually long enough to do anything else of import anyways

    It isn't actually long enough to do much else. However, when you accidentally bump the eject button instead of the pause button and you end up having to wait for the disc to load, followed by that twenty seconds of crap, followed by the time to find where you were, that twenty seconds will make a big difference in how pissed off you get.

    It is that sort of experience that has driven me to not buy DVDs from certain companies because of the ads that they make me watch. Now admittedly, that's three or four minutes worth of ads, but it's a slippery slope. The FBI warnings started at about five seconds, and now they're upping it to twenty. If we don't react negatively to this increased annoyance, a few years from now, they'll probably start making us watch one of those obnoxious three minute "You wouldn't steal a box of condoms" ads or whatever the heck they're trying to convince kids to want to steal these days.

    Wait, you mean that wasn't meant to make us want to steal a car or a handbag?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  124. Well, sheep, what is the message by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a Fox executive not yet ground into Executive Powder who is listening, he is listening to the caching of the cash register as your dollar votes come into the Fox bank account. You voted, in favor! Good for you and you can be sure he is listening and coming up with more ads for you to watch next time.

    What has to be remembered is that customer relations is a very young field that is barely researched. For most businesses, they translate a sale to a positive customer experience. It is in reality possible for a customer to use a company time and time again, in fact to totally depend on them and STILL hate its guts. This goes anywhere from users of public transport to haters of big government using government handouts (is that you bankers?) and everything in between.

    You buy their product, so they reason you must love them. You don't but how are they supposed to know? Nobody in their offices is going to tell the boss he is an idiot and that you a purchasing customer are hating the product you bought of your own free will with your hard earned money, they would look silly and not be in line for promotion and bonuses.

    I have actually had to deal with these kinds of things as an underling, the disconnect is amazing. From transport companies that wanted people to give unfiltered twitter feedback on their home page, to advertising campaigns where the only message to reach the consumer would be that they are paying for ad support for things they hate on a product they have no choice to buy from that company whose prices have gone up (water companies in Europe).

    You think some are getting the message but allowing you to skip it... NO THEY ARE NOT GETTING IT. If they got it, the ads wouldn't even be needed to be skipped, they would at most be an optional to the side extra. WHY do you think a company gets it if it thinks it can shove advertising on an already paid for product?

    See how much you have been conditioned already? You are like a girl who thinks she found a new age modern man because he only beats her with his bare hands! Just because your new owner doesn't use the whip as often does not mean you are now free slave.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  125. So, you replaced 20 second with 20 minutes by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    So basically, you replace 20 seconds of unskippable ads with about 20 minutes of them?

    Smart.

    Also, saying Green Lantern is crap when saying you watch Transformers a couple of times isn't going to impress anyone. It just says you won't every piece of dog shit shoveled in front of you. That does NOT make you a connoisseur, it just make you a finicky shit eater.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:So, you replaced 20 second with 20 minutes by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      Those long interruptions are great for channel surfing, as well as the aforementioned using the washroom, making a quick phone call, doing the dishes, or deciding "do I really want to spend another 30 minutes watching this crap?"

      Most of the time, "do I really want to spend another 30 minutes watching this crap" wins. About the only exception is Two Broke Girls (when I remember to watch it), reruns of Big Bang Theory, How I Met Your Mother, and Rules of Engagement (I missed them the first time around) and the occasional TV interview (George Stroumboulopoulos on CBC, Denis Levesque on TVA).

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
  126. Like wasting over 2000 lives at a penstroke by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

    20 seconds per movie seen.

    The rental market in the US is approximately $7.5 billion per year. If we assume $3 per rental average (Redbox is $1.25), and 1.5 people that watch the movie that's 75 billion seconds per year. Or 2376 years per year - but round down to 2000, we don't have more precision than that anyway.

    The full, entire time of 2000 people. That's what ICE Director John Morton and his pals destroy to stroke their egos.

    Eivind.

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    1. Re:Like wasting over 2000 lives at a penstroke by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's their egos they are stroking and I have suspicions of the actual age of the females in the images they are seeing.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  127. Streaming? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    It seems it's only a matter of time before streaming from Netflix and similars is hit in the same way.

  128. I want to pay fot the movies i watch... by nomaddamon · · Score: 1

    ...but no-one wants my money!
    Downloading a DVD quality movie takes about 20 seconds (250mbps here), fiddling with my tv remote to start the movie over dlna takes another 5 seconds

    When i insert a DVD, it takes 10s for boot up, another 5 sec to load the DVD, 20s of warnings that do not apply to me (Europe), 10 sec of warnings that do apply to me (selling/distributing pirated copies is illegal here, downloading is not), 2 minutes of fast forwarding (if possible) through the trailers, 10s for the menu to load, 10s for the movie to load, 30s of studio logos....

    So if i want to pirate the movie, it takes me (from the idea to actual movie) ~25 seconds. When i don't want to pirate the movie, it takes me 185 seconds (if I'm lucky) in addition to the trip to video store?

    There are no streaming services available here (i would be more than happy to pay for Netflix) and movie studios keep making paying for their work harder and harder....

    For BluRay, the time to start BR disc / download and play from net is about the same for me, but i can go make a sandwich while downloading instead of manically hitting "FF/Next/Play" on my remote

  129. 20 Seconds? by PPH · · Score: 1

    TL;DR.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  130. In related news... by guttentag · · Score: 2

    Beginning next month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will require that all new cars sold in the U.S. display a H.U.D. screen on the windshield for a full 20 seconds before the driver may put the car in drive. The screen will convey a message about the dangers of drinking and driving. A spokesperson from NHTSA says the purpose is not to prevent drunk driving, but to educate the public.

    In July, all new hammers will require the user to listen to a 20-second public service message about watching out for your fingers. Accelerometers in the device will sense any attempted use prior to the end of the message, and will trigger a restart, this time being sung as an off-key duet by Adam Sandler and the Aflack duck. A spokesman for the National Hammer Thumb Safety Administration says the purpose is not to prevent accidents, but to educate the public that it too is known as the NHTSA.

    Also, Nokia replied to criticism of its new Lumia 900 cell phone by saying that the perceived network problems are actually an enforced 20-second delay. A Nokia spokeswoman said, "sorry for the delay in returning your call. I was captivated by the beautiful interface on my new Lumia. The point of the generous -- we don't like to call it enforced -- 'respite' is not to prevent you from doing something dumb on the Internet. The point is to stop and smell the roses... To immerse the user in the Windows interface so they can become familiar with it and truly appreciate it."

    1. Re:In related news... by Zilberfrid · · Score: 1

      It would be more like: "All people calling a cab from a pub will be lectured about the dangers of drunk driving before connecting to someone who will actually make the appointment." Except that drunk driving has a lot more impact to the drunk driver and his environment than downloading will.

    2. Re:In related news... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Also, Nokia replied to criticism of its new Lumia 900 cell phone

      I can believe the rest of your post, but come on - for Nokia to get criticism of its new Lumia, people would have to buy it first.

  131. Re:Twenty Seconds? by steelfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To people sufficiently angered by this, they simply won't buy it.

    I say keep it up. Maybe when it get real bad, it will drive people to start reading again.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  132. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

    I would guess it's just yet another person who hasn't looked up what "corporatism" actually means on Wikipedia, and is consequently misinterpreting that sort-of famous Mussolini quote.

  133. Re:Twenty Seconds? by PuZZleDucK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see the FBI adds now: "You wouldn't grow a car in your backyard... Friends don't let friends grow DVDs... Yet these _criminals_ dare deprive farmers of their rightful income".

    --
    Can a person program a new solution to a problem? Why should anyone be able to stop such a thing? -Richard Stallman
  134. Re:Twenty Seconds? by PuZZleDucK · · Score: 1

    Maybe you have sweet hardware... but are you sure it's not just powering up from standby-mode. People say this about phones too now days, but if you completly power them down it takes a lot longer.

    --
    Can a person program a new solution to a problem? Why should anyone be able to stop such a thing? -Richard Stallman
  135. Re:Twenty Seconds? by mmontour · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, my DVD player did not take 45 seconds to boot up, its instantaneous: just like a TV or VCR

    DVD, sure. Try a recent Blu-Ray player.

  136. Ripped-off? Just rip it! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is one of the reasons we rip every DVD to our media server as soon as we buy it. No unskippable bits, no insults from FBI warnings or other time wasting, just the movie or set of episodes or videos that we paid for. There are a couple of drawers full of disks that are no longer needed for viewing (kept as backup and as proof of purchase). Another reason for ripping stuff to the server is simple convenience: not having to dig around for the right disk and stuff it in a mechanical device to play, hoping it has not gotten scratched through handling.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by Antarell · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons we rip every DVD to our media server as soon as we buy it. No unskippable bits, no insults from FBI warnings or other time wasting, just the movie or set of episodes or videos that we paid for. There are a couple of drawers full of disks that are no longer needed for viewing (kept as backup and as proof of purchase). Another reason for ripping stuff to the server is simple convenience: not having to dig around for the right disk and stuff it in a mechanical device to play, hoping it has not gotten scratched through handling.

      What you said! All my discs have been in the player on average of once, to be ripped, then shelved in the cupboard.

    2. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      DVDs serve only one purpose, a media to insert into my computer to be ripped so that I have the generally rich viewing capabilities available to me in VLC, or even Plex, as well as the ability for viewing in the car etc.

      All the content producers are doing is driving people to this option as fast as they can. Every time they add another UPO "feature" to a DVD/BD, or add yet another useless DRM option to BD that eats up yet another 10s of an already too long startup time, the argument against ripping drops yet another notch.

      And no, I'm not being unreasonable. When I put in the disk, I wish to watch the movie. Now. Not in 75s. Since this is the situation with my media server, there's absolutely no reason it cannot be the case for the disks, provided some control freaks would let their death grip loosen just a smidgen. As for the argument that DRM prevents piracy, it has exactly 0 effect, just as everyone predicted before BD's draconian DRM was codified.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by JWW · · Score: 1

      Sadly, even though you kept the original DVDs as proof of purchase, you still broke the law by ripping them. You'd still be labeled a "pirate" by the content industries.

      It the most maddening bit of the DMCA that by using your DVD the way you want, you're still violating the law.

    4. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Sadly, even though you kept the original DVDs as proof of purchase, you still broke the law by ripping them. You'd still be labeled a "pirate" by the content industries.

      Actually, that's country-dependent. In this country, we're allowed to lawfully format-shift media. In fact, we're allowed to lawfully copy any published media, including media borrowed from public libraries. The libraries have quite a few CDs and DVDs. This is because we pay a copyright levy on all blank CDs, blank DVDs, blank BluRays, and on all Flash media devices as well as USB disks and whatnot.

      It the most maddening bit of the DMCA that by using your DVD the way you want, you're still violating the law.

      Agreed completely, at least for those countries where this is true.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Do you think you have the right to do this?

      Yes, both morally and legally.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    6. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by Technician · · Score: 1

      This is only in places such as Finland where the DMCA is not applied. Sadly even playing without copying without a approved player such as Geexbox is considered a crime. I have not seen this enforced here so far for software players. You can't sell them legally here due to the DVD consortium, but there is little stopping free software.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by Shagg · · Score: 1

      If it's just for personal use, then nobody will ever know you did it. Whether or not it technically violates the DMCA is pointless if the copyright cartel has no way of finding out about it.

      Yes, common sense would say there should be an exception to the DMCA if no actual copyright infringement occurred. Although that provides no benefit to those who wrote the law (copyright cartel), so they didn't bother with trivial nonsense like that.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    8. Re:Ripped-off? Just rip it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      File a police report. Provide an exhaustive list of the DVDs which were stolen. (Which, since you have the rips, should be easy enough.) File a copy of the police report (in PDF form).

      If anybody ever asks about the rips, provide them with a copy of the police report. If their response is "prove you had them" your response should be "I'm innocent until proven guilty - you prove I didn't have them".

  137. Re:Twenty Seconds? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    Powered off from the wall
    Hardware is nothing special, just the cheapest Samsung that was available and the other is the cheapest Sony with DivX support that was available
    But as someone else pointed out, could be because they are DVD only and not Blueray

  138. Aarghl by zmooc · · Score: 1

    I never buy DVDs. However, the wife does buy some second hand crap for the kids to watch every now and then. I typically put them on when I get out of bed and want some peace and quiet to sip my coffee. Waiting for a minute for this crap and having to sit it out because I still have to click the play button once its done with 2 impatient kids on the couch has made me destroy almost all those DVDs in frustration. The kids now hate DVDs and the wife doesn't buy any new ones. Problem solved. Fuckers.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
    1. Re:Aarghl by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      I hate that it's come it to this, but another solution I've used is to just put the DVD in well before I'm going to watch it and leave the TV turned off. Then, when I'm ready to watch, all that cruft has already played.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:Aarghl by zmooc · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that I'm still sleeping in the "well before" phase while the kids are yelling they want to watch Sesame Street :p

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
  139. Re:Twenty Seconds? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Hah! Then Inflatable Ingrid and I are way above average. Our lovemaking can sometimes go on for minutes.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  140. What the ... ? by X.25 · · Score: 1

    These people really seem to live in some parallel universe if they think forcing 'unskippable' content onto people that paid for disks is somehow 'educating' them.

  141. The other side by AdeBaumann · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a British film on BR which has a "by buing this Blu-Ray, you're supporting our film. Thank you!"-message at the start. Doesn't take more than about 4-5 seconds (basically as long as it takes to read out the sentence to you)... Even if it is unskippable, I somehow don't mind that one too much.

    --
    I gave up sigs almost a year ago.
  142. Re:Twenty Seconds? by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    You forgot the 20 seconds for the animated menu to run through the best clips from the movie before actually showing a menu that allows you to play the movie.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  143. OH for fuck's sake! by mug+funky · · Score: 1

    i author DVDs for a living. thankfully in a slightly saner country.

    this shit just pisses me off.

    DVD retail sales were shrinking at a whopping 15% per quarter this time last year.

    so how do you sell more DVDs? by punishing the only people loyal/moral/dumb enough to buy them!

    FYI, if a client asks for their shit to be unskippable, i politely forget to disable skip and fast-forward. say "oh, crap, i forgot, you see our policy is to make all that stuff skippable, so i didn't change that bit from the template project". usually it doesn't come to that though.

    myself and my colleagues are all painfully aware that downloads are faster, better quality and more convenient than DVDs. they're approaching blu-ray for quality, and shit all over them for convenience. do we really need to scare off what remains of our market?

  144. Re:20s? Could be a lot worse by Zilberfrid · · Score: 1

    These messages will be hard to walk out on, they will show when you hit play, there is not much you can do in that time. It's not "drop in the DVD and do something, the bad stuff will go away" it's "OK, you have had your time to show previews and warnings, I am ready, show me the movie... Wait, what is this crap?!". People ignored the previous warnings (they did not pertain to them) and these people hate nothing more than to be ignored. Piracy be damned, just WATCH OUR MESSAGES. One of the most idiotic ideas of these people yet, if they really were aiming to reach their stated goal.

  145. Geexbox by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Nice project. Now I finally have a good reason to revive my b0rked Toshiba laptop with the burned out video processor and turn it into a media player.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  146. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Rakshasa-sensei · · Score: 1

    And there's community-based black-market suppliers that, if you select the ones with good reputation, provide better products, don't call you a potential thief and don't charge you any money at all.

  147. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

    She...she didn't tell me she was seeing somebody else... :-(

  148. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would happily and with a giddy demeanor spend hour upon hour working on a means to avoid ever having to sit through 20 seconds of Australia's never to be sufficiently goddamned "must play this" anti piracy advert. Why? Because my enjoyment of the successful completion of the project, even if it was negative would still be worthwhile in view of the irritation and anger I experience every single time I see that same ad, with the same immensely annoying soundtrack. Right at the start of what is supposed to be entertainment!!!!! . Reliably avoiding that negative experience would vastly increase my enjoyment of the product that I have paid for. Dull, repetitive garbage that treats the customer like a child in need of endless repetition of recording industry lies has no place in entertainment.

    --
    "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
  149. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

    If you hadn't posted AC, this would be +5 by now.

    --
    "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
  150. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Informative

    You only think you're joking. Google Wickard v Filburn.

  151. Good Old Movies by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    I wonder if a GOG.com type of scheme would work for movies? What do you think? No DRM, no bullshit, throw in some extras, possibly concentrate on older stuff only.

  152. Some studios are ok by Card · · Score: 1

    Some studios are playing nicely. Criterion Collection's discs don't have warnings, just their and occasionally Janus Films's logo. Same applies to Eureka's Masters of Cinema releases. Blue Underground's Zombi 2 has a 5 second FBI warning in the beginning, but to my astonishment the disc resumes playback from the previous position without prompting - the first disc I've seen that does this.

    On the other end of the spectrum is Fox. Sigh.

  153. Bugs Bunny says... by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

    "an ICE spokesman says the intent isn't to deter piracy but to educate the public that pirating DVDs and Blu-rays allows you to skip the bullshit and get right to the movie."

    ICE: what a bunch of maroons.

  154. There they go again... by programmerar · · Score: 1

    There they go again, degrading the quality of their product, where the competitor already had a greater quality product, at a lower price.

  155. No DVD/BRD for me by Novogrudok · · Score: 1

    I actually have not played a DVD on a TV for more than a year now; recently I have thrown away the DVD player as it was just taking space near the TV. I watch movies on netflix or saved programs on DVR. I cannot be bothered to go to the movie rental place which is 10 minutes walk from my house anymore.

  156. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Guignol · · Score: 1

    SO is significant other, and the hand seems like a poor choice of significant other, though it does seem reasonable as a special other

  157. Why? by biodata · · Score: 1

    Does anyone buy these any more?

    --
    Korma: Good
  158. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Zixia · · Score: 1

    Twenty seconds...that's too much for you to suffer through?

    Fuck, get a drink or take a piss. You probably won't have time to do either.

    If this is the level of inconvenience that would cause anyone to get upset, they need to see a shrink because they have issues.

    Well, yeah. Except I stick the disc in to the machine, wander off to get a drink, or a snack, or take a piss, and when I get back the DVD is stuck on a language select screen, which is only there so that it can better serve me the copyright warning. So I still have to wait around to get to that screen, or come back and wait through the copyright messages. On a disc I've bought.

    Then there are the discs that start playing the feature automatically after a short period of time, because, I dunno, they think some people are too stupid to work out how to start it running? So I stick the disc in the machine, go to get a drink, snack, or have a piss, and before I get back the film starts and I have to skip back to where I want to be.

    No, on the level of frustration it's not particularly high, but it is a frustration. I only wander away from the machine because it has lots of unskippable crap. I have been conditioned to start a disc before I'm ready to watch it. This isn't right, and certainly not when I've been a good little consumer and paid for the product. I should be able to get myself ready, then start the disc, in much the same way that I do with a computer game, book, bath, car, washing machine, cooker, board game, any-other-thing. I have yet to find that I need to prime a toilet twenty seconds before I need to use it, just so that it flushes there and then and doesn't have me standing near my own filth waiting for it to be ready.

  159. Re:Twenty Seconds? by careysub · · Score: 2

    The point was that 20 seconds isn't actually long enough to do anything else of import anyways

    It isn't actually long enough to do much else. However, when you accidentally bump the eject button instead of the pause button and you end up having to wait for the disc to load, followed by that twenty seconds of crap, followed by the time to find where you were, that twenty seconds will make a big difference in how pissed off you get.

    ...

    And add that to the unskippable ads that last several minutes. I already have the practice of "pre-loading" a Blu-Ray before viewing it - sticking it in the player several minutes BEFORE I am ready to sit down and watch it, then come back once it has reached the selection menu and then turn on the TV.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  160. stupid by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Having the screens up, ok, but having them unskippable is just stupid and even pushing people who buy them legit to download..

  161. It's not going to make that much of a difference by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    I've far too gorram many movies that already lock me out of the controls until I am forced to watch the government warnings, the anti-piracy commercials, the advertisements for the Blu-Ray format and how spiffy it is, the coming features...

    I have one disk that literally forces me to sit there for 15 minutes before I can get to the menu, another 20 seconds of the menu's fancy-dancy artwork to finish, then another 15 seconds of the studio's bullcrap.

    And they wonder why people go to piracy?

    In my case I found a nice way to get around it. Quasi-legally in fact. And the idea came from the DVD/Blu-Ray Piracy software sector. When I found out that the software to defeat the copy-protection and the region encoding also defeated the control lockouts, I did my research and found one that was cheap and works. I went with Slysoft's AnyDVD software.

    Now when I built my Media Center PC with the Blu-Ray drive, I have that program running. *If* I were to be pirating the movies, this program allows the next program (a ripper/compression/burner) to do its job. But as a nice side effect it deactivates the lock-outs and allows me to load a disk, bring up my DVD Software (VLC) and go straight to the menu. The only wait I have now is if there is the studio promo but I can tolerate 5-15 seconds as long as I'm not forced to watch 20 minutes of crap.

    And this is why it's not going to make much of a difference. Either they're going to go up against people like us who are tech-savvy enough to do the same thing that I did and tell them to slag off, or they're going to up against pirates who are going to rent the movies from Blockbuster/Netflix/Redbox and burn copies (assuming that they just don't download .ISO's from The Pirate Bay).

    Or they're going to shoot themselves in the foot by pissing people off to the point where they stop getting DVD's altogether and start using the online streaming providers. Between Netflix and Blockbuster's streaming services...I can get most of the movies and shows I want without having to worry about DVD lockouts and government warnings.

    And there is the added benefit of watching over and over again and not having to worry about a physical disk to get scratched.

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  162. Government warnings by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

    And it is disingenuous to call these "government warnings" when they are really industry warnings.

    If you live in the U.S., industry *is* your government in a very practical sense. They write the laws, and they choose who signs them.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  163. Last Century Fox by tepples · · Score: 1

    just name all those a-list actors, directors, film execs or people in related businesses like music who are big fans and donors to the GOP.

    I always thought Rupert Murdoch's Twentieth Century Fox was GOP-affiliated.

  164. really shows the level of arrogance of the mpaa by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    The pirate version is better, but they will claim people want it only because it is free.

  165. Honest people are the only ones who see this by realsilly · · Score: 1

    Really? So the honest person who pays for his/her copy of the product will be forced to have this crap shoved down their throat. It's as stupid as gun laws. Those who abide by the law pay the price of the stupid ones enacted due to the not so honest folk.

    Pathetic.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  166. Not on mine.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    All DVD's and BluRay's never get played until they are Ripped and stripped of that crap and then put on the NAS so the XBMC's around the house can play them.

    I dont tolerate that crap.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  167. Re:Twenty Seconds? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    It takes AT LEAST 20 seconds for the wife and kids to finish in the bathroom after I've put the disk into the player to show up in the family room when we are starting a movie. I can skip though the 'comming attractions' on the disk (though we actually find SOME of them interesting). BTW IIRC the Oppo-video DVD players do have some button press combo that will actually skip all this shit (including the FBI logo) and jump to the main menu. (They also can be hacked via a few button presses to become regionless ... it's all in undocumented 'back door' codes in the firmware).

  168. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Metabolife · · Score: 1

    So you're saying I should waste 30minutes to skip 20s?

    I can see the living room now:

    Dad: "Hey kids! I've just rented Termodemoblaster 5XX!"
    Kids: "Yay! Let's watch it!"
    Dad: "Sure thing! Let me just fire up my media center and rip it to the hard drive first."
    Kids: "crickets"

  169. Americuh! F*** yeah! by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    I love the NIPRC eagle. Nice touch. Even the official seals of the armed forces don't have such menacing eagles on it. That logo practically screams, "Americuh! F*** yeah!"

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  170. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    That's the insidious thing about these new ones though - they won't play until *after* you press play on the menu. So you get all that shit you can just pre-load by putting the disc in before swapping the TV over the DVD feed, but you can't get past these new segments so easily.

  171. Com'on Guys.. it's only 20 seconds by TPoise · · Score: 1

    It's only another 20 seconds. You already are forced to sit through 15 minutes of trailers of worthless straight-to-video trash on Blu-Rays nowadays, what's another 20 seconds?

  172. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Yes, but these new ones are going after you hit "play" and before the movie starts. Much harder to skip them by letting the disk do its thing while people are in the bathroom, getting drinks etc. This one won't start until you're all sat down and ready to start the movie.

    Thus, much easier to just buy the DVD then either rip it or torrent it. *Much* superior product from a torrent site. With my connection I can get most HD content in about 5 minutes, so that can be downloading while people use the bathroom, get drinks etc, then it will play when I hit play. No bullshit.

  173. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Pope · · Score: 1

    The business plan of the studios that signed up to participate is literally:

    1. Annoy your paying customers.

    2. ???

    3. Profit!!!

    What actually happened is that they finally managed to make me stop buying movies. There were many close calls before, but this is finally the last straw.

    They started the "Annoy your customers" years ago by putting overly long menus and transitions in. Then it kept going when they added trailers and commercials before the main menu. Then they made those unskippable. These anti-piracy ads are just the latest in a long line of "Annoy the paying customer" business decisions.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  174. How to do that with mplayer? by sustik · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me how to always play these clips? I normally use:

    mplayer -dvd-device dir dvd://1 -vf ...
    but occasionally the main feature is in section 2 etc.

    Are these going to be in section 1 and 2 predictably? I want to update my script
    so I do not miss these educational messages.

    Thank you!

  175. Re:Twenty Seconds? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    TL;DR

  176. Can I buy a TV that skips this? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Can I buy a TV that can "learn" what these videos look like and when it recognizes one playing, mutes the sound and puts up a countdown timer:

    "You have 20 seconds to use the bathroom"
    "You have 19 seconds to use the bathroom" ...
    "Bathroom break over in 3"
    "Bathroom break over in 2"
    "Bathroom break over in 1"

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  177. Re:Twenty Seconds? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    If your yearly income is 1 million dollars, that 20 seconds is worth about $600

    Interesting math. That's equivalent to being paid for 9.26 hours. Now, you might argue that millionaires don't work more than 9.26 hours in a year, but... *really*?

  178. Re:Twenty Seconds? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    > And then it becomes required that you cannot rip a legitimate copy without those government-imposed blurbs.

    *snork*

  179. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

    even watch the chapters out of order.

    Some of the anti-ripping techniques employed by the studios these days actually encourage this!

  180. Re:Twenty Seconds? by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

    If I had points, I'd mod you informative. There's already a precedent. All hope is lost. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

  181. Re:Twenty Seconds? by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

    You're not suggesting... Clearly, if that's what was going on, they'd have usernames and boatloads of karma.

  182. DVDs? BlueRay? by cowdung · · Score: 1

    What do people still live in the 20th Century?

    I live in South America.. and I can't remember the last time I used such obsolete technology. Today is all about streaming content.. Netflix, iTunes.. who needs that obsolete region locked garbage?

  183. Media is done by SeanBlader · · Score: 1

    I guess that means I won't be buying anymore plastic discs.

  184. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jmactacular · · Score: 1

    Well done, sir. Well done.

  185. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Anonymous+Cowled · · Score: 1

    If your yearly income is 1 million dollars, that 20 seconds is worth about $600.

    Um... it's probably a good idea for you to stop drinking and dividing.

  186. Can't wait! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where I can find a torrent of the govt. warning video? I can't wait to see it. I'd even settle for a cam. Anyone?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  187. Re:Twenty Seconds? by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, over 1000 DVDs onto a server with how much disc space?

  188. Re:Twenty Seconds? by Fned · · Score: 1

    No, you didn't. It's twenty. lousy. freaking. seconds.

    For twenty seconds it is annoying, stupid and useless, therefore it is bad. Argument over.

    Literally all it does is piss some people off. That's all. It has no other function whatsoever.

    Seriously, try this the next time you go into a supermarket: start picking people out at random and spend twenty seconds, each, loudly admonishing them not to steal anything. Make sure to block the path of their shopping carts until you're done. See how they respond. For that matter, see how the STORE responds.

    From the curb, please take a moment to reflect on how it totally didn't matter that it was twenty lousy freaking seconds, and how no one seemed to care when you claimed to be educating the customers as a benefit to the store.

    For bonus points, actually run a store where the staff does this. Track how long it takes before you have no customers.

  189. Re:Twenty Seconds? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    That may well be enough to make me return the disc to the store as defective. Repeatedly.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  190. Re:Twenty Seconds? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    She only ever goes down on me

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  191. Re:Twenty Seconds? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    Reading? You're kidding, right?

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  192. Re:Twenty Seconds? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    Next up, when you press the start button on your new car, you get a 20 second lecture about DUI before the engine starts. If you don't gripe too loudly, they'll throw in a commercial or two.

    You need to pay more attention. You wont get a lecture they want to drug test you before your car will start.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  193. Theif by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You are a thief and a criminal.

    Or something like that.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  194. Re:Twenty Seconds? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    The insanity for me was when Disney was able to patent "fast play" where a DVD inserted will automatically play the movie, if no other buttons are pressed. They used to call that "play" 20 years before with the VCR, but apparently the exact same thing done for decades is different if you change media.