Slashdot Mirror


Apple Tells Siri To Stop Recommending Nokia

judgecorp writes "Apple has changed the answer Siri gives to the question 'What is the best smartphone ever?' to prevent the voice-driven assistant from promoting the Nokia Lumia 900. Originally Siri trawled online reviews on the web, using the Wolfram Alpha search engine, to come up with the Lumia, much to Apple's embarrassment. Now, Apple has intervened, replacing that answer with a joke: 'Wait there are other phones?'"

337 comments

  1. Not just Apple by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do a search on Google for "What is the best web browser" and guess what, you'll get a nice list of reviews, every single one of which lists Google Chrome as the best web browser. Oddly enough, if you do the same search in Bing, you get a few results that don't seem to show up near the top of the Google search.

    Basically, never look for objective information from someone who has their own horse in the race. I would no more trust Apple with advice on computer or smartphone purchasing advice than I would trust Norton with advice on the best anti-virus software.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Not just Apple by smg5266 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I searched "best web browser" on Google and the second result was mozilla.org

    2. Re:Not just Apple by chispito · · Score: 2

      You make a valid point, you have to always consider the source. I actually think it's some pretty clever self-effacing humor on Apple's part--something far too rare.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:Not just Apple by buchner.johannes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The term is "search engine Filter Bubble" -- see the nice introduction at http://dontbubble.us/ (admittedly focussed on avoiding personalisation).
      If you use a meta search engine that doesn't collect personal information, such as DuckDuckGo.com, you can escape that problem.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    4. Re:Not just Apple by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      Funny, I searched that exact thing and got a bunch of reviews for everything from I.E. to Mozilla to Opera.

    5. Re:Not just Apple by DanTheStone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get this one, which has Chrome and Firefox tied, on my first page of Google results. It doesn't look like Google is deliberately and directly biasing those search results like Apple.

    6. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interesting. Second result for me is Opera, and I'm a Chrome user.

    7. Re:Not just Apple by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why in the world would you google "What is the best web browser"?

      Stupid shit like that is what is breaking google today, and why it is so much less useful than it used to be. You can't even get the damn thing to include what it considers punctuation anymore.

      Googling "Web Browser Best", without quotes, gets you a first page of all review articles on that topic as you would expect, only the last link points to chrome.

    8. Re:Not just Apple by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      I get this one, which has Chrome and Firefox tied, on my first page of Google results.

      It actually has Chrome, Firefox, and Opera tied with 8.5 out of 10, with IE (8.0) and Safari (7.8) trailing.

    9. Re:Not just Apple by Oracle+of+Naples · · Score: 1

      Eh yeah sure, searching for "web browser best" makes so much more sense than "what is the best web browser?"

    10. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the world would you google "What is the best web browser"?

      Because you're a regular person who's gotten used to the idea that computers should be able to answer naturally-phrased questions.

    11. Re:Not just Apple by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just did the same, Mozilla is the second spot. Spot #5 says "You really can't go wrong with any Web browser choice these days. Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, and Safari, all are fast, standards ..."

      The thing is, if Google gives you bogus results they're going to lose your eyeballs; that's one of many things that makes Google superior to Bing. Bad search results hurt their bottom line, while Siri's answers aren't going to stop anybody from buying another iPhone.

    12. Re:Not just Apple by daniel78 · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the point you're trying to make(that we should question our sources), I get pretty much the same results for your query on bing and google. Any summaries that indicate a favourite, pretty much all favour chrome (this is true on both bing and google, and isn't all that suprising if recent changes in market share are anything to go by)

      I don't see any evidence of deliberate bias here.

      Interestingly, the most obvious difference is that the top entry on Bing, is a paid ad for IE9.

    13. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing says Internet Explorer?!?!??!? this is an outrage!!!!!! I'm calling my congressmen that they need to put a stop to this monopoly that Microsoft is doing! Apple and Google don't have a big share of the market so it's ok for them but look at MS they have a huge chunk of the Computer Field. Period.

    14. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 - mozilla
      2 - review site
      3 - chrome

    15. Re:Not just Apple by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      I followed your link and get Firefox, Chrome, Internet Explorer, Chrome, a deleted page, Internet Explorer, Firefox, a list that puts Safari at the top, "you can't go wrong with any", then Firefox and Chrome tied.

      I think your example is failing upon examination.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    16. Re:Not just Apple by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It does, this is why I tend to be able to find stuff others cannot.

      Use tools correctly and they work better.

    17. Re:Not just Apple by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Which page would that be on? I'm on the first page and see a large list of results that's fairly mixed. First five, for example are: (no browser shown), Chrome, Internet Explorer, Chrome, and "You can't go wrong with any browser these days".

      Chrome has a slight edge, but given friends don't recommend IE to friends, Firefox's problems from Firefox 4 to Firefox 9 - it'll probably take years to fix the loss of good will that caused, and the general lack of interest the world has in Opera, I'm not remotely surprised Chrome would have a slight edge.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:Not just Apple by DanTheStone · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I mistakenly assumed that they would be sorted by descending overall score, so I stopped when I saw IE.

    19. Re:Not just Apple by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not yet anyway. If someone else comes out with a better equivalent to Siri, or Siri starts producing terrible results that aren't for gimmicky questions people will drop it like a rock.

      Imagine if you could inject ads directly into Siri for example, queries would give preferential results based on the location you queried from and common terms were bid for (say optometrist, and the highest bidding optometrist within 10Km would get their result) that could, in the long run, seriously undermine the credibility of a project like Siri. Right now it's experimental, it can fail humourously and no one gets to fussed about it. But if there are competitors on the market, that could be a problem.

    20. Re:Not just Apple by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (shrug). Google and Bing always come-up with different results.

      What concerns me more is that Apple deliberately made Siri less-useful to the owner. What happens if you ask, "What is the best computer?" Or "What is the best MP3 player?" Or "What is the best tablet for reading books?" Now I have to wonder if Apple will censor those answers too. I buy a computer, or laptop, or phone, to help ME out with attaining knowledge not to serve the corporate master who built the computer/laptop/phone.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    21. Re:Not just Apple by dfcamara · · Score: 0

      Mozilla Firefox apeared first for me in Google.

    22. Re:Not just Apple by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're just looking for a bullet point list, Chrome comes out on top of or tied for a lot metrics:
      * speed
      * implementation of standards
      * extensibility
      * cross-device synching
      * ability to deploy across multiple devices

      Firefox loses in the corporate world thanks to some publicized missteps, IE loses in the FOSS world because it's IE, and Opera is the perennial also-ran. Chrome nicely splits the middle between IE and Firefox. As a result, it's not surprising that a number of common review sites show Chrome as tied or slightly ahead of the others. Compare that to hubpages (smells like Geocities to me) , and I'm surprised that Bing is actually going there.

      Finally, do a search for What's the best social network, and Google returns oodles of results that don't even mention G+. Considering that G+ is much more important to Google than Chrome, I'd say that if they are tweaking their results, they're doing it wrong.

      Finally, the sites that sit on top of the Google search are the ones I expect to be there: PCMag, usatoday, lifehacker...

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    23. Re:Not just Apple by RanCossack · · Score: 1

      I am a bit in awe; you posted a link, then outright fabricated entirely different results to rant against -- and still you have several people nodding and agreeing with you... and a score of 4, while I'm writing this.

      That's making being adverse to RTFM to a new level and making it work for you.

    24. Re:Not just Apple by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      wolfram alpha powers Bing a microsoft product and rates a windows phone as the best in the world.

      who's got a horse in the race, again? Maybe the N900 is being heavily marketed but it's not the phone that springs to mind as the best smart phone?

      I honestly couldn't say what is but i wouldn't have thought it would be a windows phone.
      so what is ?

    25. Re:Not just Apple by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      I buy a computer, or laptop, or phone, to help ME out with attaining knowledge not to serve the corporate master who built the computer/laptop/phone.

      "You're doing it wrong, sinner. Send us a load of money as your penance." - Apple.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    26. Re:Not just Apple by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      I just get a bunch of paid advertisements (both bing and google), followed by general reviews.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    27. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And for the real win, "best web browser" on DuckDuckGo gives http://www.consumersearch.com/web-browser-reviews as the top link.

    28. Re:Not just Apple by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      Not nearly as self-effacing as the truth though. Which they edited out.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    29. Re:Not just Apple by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      Perhaps is you explained WHY "web browser best" is better than "best web browser", we would understand better. Aren't all the words weighted equally, regardless of position?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    30. Re:Not just Apple by cupantae · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about all this is that it means crazyjj has been searching for Chrome-related things enough for Google to give him those results!

      For the record, I got a few independent, unbiased browser round-ups. That makes me feel pretty good about my searching habits.

      --
      --
    31. Re:Not just Apple by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      wolfram alpha powers Bing a microsoft product and rates a windows phone as the best in the world.

      So what? It powers Bing, it is not powered by Bing. Why would the WA results be biased at all? Here is their results page:

      http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=best+smartphone

      As of the time I'm writing this, they have results listed by average customer rating and they list 2 HTC phones, 2 iPhones, and the N900 with averages of 5.

      Besides, by your logic, since WA also powers Siri then they should be biased towards Apple, so why did it recommend a competing product?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    32. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't sure before, but now 100% certain that crazyjj is just another bonch sockpuppet.

    33. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So basically you're complaining because nepotism is no longer in the domain of "things a computer will never be as good at as a human".

    34. Re:Not just Apple by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded as a troll?

      --
      /* No Comment */
    35. Re:Not just Apple by madhi19 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus if Google were to game the search this way they get into anti-trust and anti-competition territory while we all know Apple can do no wrong.

    36. Re:Not just Apple by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI, Tellme is just as good as Siri

    37. Re:Not just Apple by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      Then you should better get un-used to that idea. You don't type "Where did I mention Brad?" into a text editor's search box.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    38. Re:Not just Apple by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I think that would be fine as well. I would prefer it weighted the earlier words heavier, but I bet these days it is dumbed down in that way as well.

      He did not google "best web browser" he googled "What is the best web browser". Note the several extra words.

    39. Re:Not just Apple by PIBM · · Score: 1

      I do not get any browser in the top 10 with the same search string, only reviews and comparisons of different web browsers.

    40. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It defaults to including all search terms, and prioritizes results where they appear close together, so 'what is the best web browser?' returns fewer results than 'web browser best' - because you're essentially filtering out all results that don't include the word 'what'. A page with the title 'comparison of browsers, may 2012' for example wouldn't be listed if it doesn't include the word 'what' and anywhere near the other words, even if it's technically the best article on the subject.

      Search terms work best when they're terse; the fewer words you include in your query, the less likely you are to filter out a result that you want. You should only add extra words to filter out noise if one of your terms is overloaded (eg, compare 'Iron Man Sabbath' instead of just 'Iron Man').

    41. Re:Not just Apple by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Then you are an idiot. Some day that might be true, but today computers cannot answer naturally phrased questions. If they should or not is neither here nor there.

    42. Re:Not just Apple by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What concerns me more is that Apple deliberately made Siri less-useful to the owner.

      This is one of the situations where Apple really ought to be taking a page from Google. The problem in this case is that Siri is returning a nonsense answer as a result of Microsoft's astroturfing and marketing attempts to try to make Nokia not feel as lonely at the bottom of the market share charts.

      The "right" way to fix that is to make your search algorithm less susceptible to slashvertizements and spam reviews. The stupid way is to change the single result someone pointed out to you and let the device continue telling people that snake oil cures cancer and plants crave Brawndo.

    43. Re:Not just Apple by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much of a "win" a site that claims "Firefox 5" to be the best browser can really be considered.

    44. Re:Not just Apple by makomk · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, if you search "what is the best web browser" (without the quotes!) like the person you're replying to did, you get slightly different results. I see, in order a comparison from some site I've never heard of with Google Chrome as #1, a LifeHacker page (Chrome again), a random Yahoo! Answers link ("Google Chrome is, for Windows users, the fastest web browser."), a review with 4 equal "best browsers" including Chrome, a PC Mag review (spoiler: Chrome wins!), a really annoying YouTube video where Firefox comes first, "Review: Best Web browser? Google's Chrome outshines pack", a review where Firefox wins, and finally one that doesn't answer the question at all.

    45. Re:Not just Apple by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Odd, for me, the ad displayed at the top was for IE9 from Microsoft, a review site was number one, Firefox was number 2, and Chrome was number 3...

    46. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The improvement is that he didn't include "what is the" which appear on nearly every page in the internet thus adding noise.

    47. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      laptop, or phone, to help ME out with attaining knowledge not to serve the corporate master who built the computer/laptop/phone.

      Then you shouldn't be buying Apple. It's well known their platform is all about lockdown and tying you into their ecosystem.

      If you want an open platform, buy an open platform. Apple is not that. Hasn't been for decades.

    48. Re:Not just Apple by Applekid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not yet anyway. If someone else comes out with a better equivalent to Siri, or Siri starts producing terrible results that aren't for gimmicky questions people will drop it like a rock.

      Nope, because Apple would simply disallow any app from their market from competing with Siri (just like alternate web browsers, alternate stores, etc). iPhone users can't run what they want without talented hackers.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    49. Re:Not just Apple by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      So, in short, Google is acting shady because you didn't see two results from linkfarms - when Google has been quite transparent about their anti-linkfarm activities?

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    50. Re:Not just Apple by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Not really position do matter so does the numbers of keywords you get better result by trimming down your search to the bare essential words.

    51. Re:Not just Apple by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pity I am out of mod points.

      People seem obsessed with the idea that all products within a market should meet THEIR needs, and get rather pissy when something is both popular and not geared towards them. If Apple meets ones needs, by Apple. If Android does a better job, buy Android, rinse lather repeat.

    52. Re:Not just Apple by broseidon · · Score: 2

      .. but Brawndo's got electrolytes!

    53. Re:Not just Apple by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Next month, when it's Firefox 15, someone will just add a '1'

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    54. Re:Not just Apple by lgw · · Score: 1

      Why not? Becuase you're used to a bad tool that requires technical skill to use, everyone should pay the same price? Better to improve the tool until anyone can use it naturally.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    55. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how much of a "win" a site that claims "Firefox 5" to be the best browser can really be considered.

      You can hardly penalise it for being, what, a couple of weeks out of date?

    56. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like the tone of you reply, sir!

      --
      Siri

    57. Re:Not just Apple by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      funny you can't run what ever you want on the most popular android devices either without talented hackers.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    58. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Siri results are pretty basic as it is. The Yelp iPhone app is a much better tool for finding restaurants or such. Google and/or Wikipedia still rule for answering obscure questions

      The only thing it's truly useful for is voice dialing or creating quick appointments without the hassle of opening the calendar or task app.

      Siri is a toy, it's Apple's toy, and if Apple takes it and goes home, I wouldn't miss it.

    59. Re:Not just Apple by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      And then they won't buy iphones the next time around. If you really like how Siri 1.0 behaves, and hate Siri 2.0 someone who comes along with a non iPhone Siri clone you may find it worthwhile to switch.

    60. Re:Not just Apple by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The point is moot. They changed the link order completely, probably in response to this thread.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    61. Re:Not just Apple by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No it's not. because I cant make tellme work without touching the phone.

      Siri I can do a long press on my BT headset and get her to work. Tellme will not work this way.

      And both are epic fails as they do not return all information in speech form. any response that is a "look at these results on the screen" is an epic fail on any speech system.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    62. Re:Not just Apple by JohnG · · Score: 1

      Siri seems to do a good job of it. The article isn't about someone asking her, "smart phone best?"

    63. Re:Not just Apple by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually the Android fanbois foam at the mouth when I point out how androids voice control is seriously lacking. I should be able to set my android phone out of my reach and have a conversation with it only using the BT headset and the single button on it's side to activate the Voice control.

      I hear that ICS fixed how bad the voice system is in android, but my current android phone running 2.3.3 is utterly useless even for voice dialing. it gives ZERO response to my command "Call home" I get no feedback other than the phone call starting. And calling my friend dave always fails if I say "call dave" as Android does the epic fail of displaying a list of daves to choose from, and then home,work,cell choices. Hello? tell me in a voice in my ear and listen for my response.

      complete epic fail if I have to look at a screen and touch the phone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    64. Re:Not just Apple by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hate siri 1.0 because it removed the standard apple voice control that was in the 3GS and 4.0 that works when you dont have a internet connection. siri does not work when you have no net connection. so voice dialing or voice control of the music fails when out of service range.

      another epic failure of cloud crap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    65. Re:Not just Apple by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      That's the RDF at work. The problem is, that these posts, misleading headlines, etc, grab attention and direct people away from the fact that it does seem to be only Apple that does this, although I think Microsoft has been caught doing it before as well.

    66. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got Netscape.

    67. Re:Not just Apple by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      ..and it's what plants crave

    68. Re:Not just Apple by rhook · · Score: 1

      Are you logged into Google? Personalized results.

    69. Re:Not just Apple by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      I tried it from a chrome incognito window, and the first result was a review site (toptenreviews), second was mozilla, third was chrome, and fourth was opera. In a non incognito the 3rd and 4th results were switched.

    70. Re:Not just Apple by MisterSquid · · Score: 2

      I buy a computer, or laptop, or phone, to help ME out with attaining knowledge not to serve the corporate master who built the computer/laptop/phone.

      If you were looking for the "best" computer or the "best" MP3 player would you *really* go to Google/Siri/Bing/${random_ILS} and type a question like "What is the best ${device_or_service}?"

      I didn't think so.

      --
      blog
    71. Re:Not just Apple by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Long press on the windows button is the same as a long press on the headset. It's not like you're on the other side of the house with your bluetooth headset, unless you have some trippy powered antenna sticking out of your brain

    72. Re:Not just Apple by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      I just so happen to have a couple alternate web browsers installed on my iPad. I had a problem with how Safari was rendering a page with a frame-embedded PDF, so I found one that didn't use the iOS UIWebView backend.

    73. Re:Not just Apple by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      If you are asking questions like that to your iPhone/Siri you are questioning your faith.
      Can't have that.

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    74. Re:Not just Apple by smudj · · Score: 0

      Not my experience with Android. Isn't it just a matter of going to Settings-->Applications and checking the "unknown sources" box? My Thinkpad tablet already had it checked and was preinstalled with the Lenovo App store (and Lenovo App store apps like Quill) and I was able to just install the Amazon app store. No hackers involved.

    75. Re:Not just Apple by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      This is the same page that Bing brings up as it's first result.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    76. Re:Not just Apple by Zinho · · Score: 1

      This is the same page that Bing brings up as it's first result.

      That's unsurprising, as DDG uses Bing as its backend.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    77. Re:Not just Apple by Kalriath · · Score: 2

      No you didn't, because Apple forbids web browsers on the iPhone/iPad that don't use UIWebView. You would have found a browser that preprocesses the page on a server before sending it to the client which uses UIWebView to render it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    78. Re:Not just Apple by Kalriath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So it's not possible that there are reviewers that actually like the phone? It's just Microsoft astroturfing? Yeah, right. God you people are so narcissistic.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    79. Re:Not just Apple by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Depends. Ever tried Firefox 6+? Exactly.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    80. Re:Not just Apple by Kalriath · · Score: 2

      The bad news is that Nightly is already Firefox 15.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    81. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How so? With the exception of apps that require root, you can easily install and run apps from unknown sources (ie. not found in the Google Play Store). There's an explicit setting in android that lets you do so.

    82. Re:Not just Apple by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      iPhone users can't run what they want without talented hackers.

      Well to get the ball rolling, yes, but in my experience running Jailbreak on an iPhone is about as plug and play as a dildo. It's not all that difficult.

    83. Re:Not just Apple by RodBee · · Score: 1

      On a huge off-topic, if you have Siri, can you ask "what is best in life?" and post results for us?

    84. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can get voice control back by turning Siri off.

    85. Re:Not just Apple by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google isn't consistent. Their servers don't perfectly sync and are always crawling. They talked about it in an interview here years ago I think.

      Many large sites with non-critical data work this way (and the nitty gritty exact search order for any given second/minute/hour/day is non-critical).

      Facebook does something similar with post visibility (it's not necessarily instant everywhere), and I've had friends call in panic when a mutual friend's memorialized account dropped off the internet for up to a day as it transitioned (some could see it, some couldn't, and it would go back and forth for some people).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    86. Re:Not just Apple by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My bluetooth has always worked better in the 5-10 foot range than with phone in my pocket (unless I think about the pocket).

      When doing chores I generally leave the phone in the room with me, but not carry it. But it's usually when ironing/folding laundry at a hotel and talking to family that it even matters. I couldn't imagine wearing an earpiece around just to use Siri.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    87. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also check to see if Siri knows the riddle of steel.

    88. Re:Not just Apple by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      And if you want to find the text "Where did I mention Brad"" you're supposed to type "Where did I type 'Where did I mention Brad?'?"?

      That would surely be a bad tool. Nope, if I want to find where I mentioned Brad, I type "Brad" into the search box and the editor finds it and highlights it. If I want to find the text "Where did I mention Brad?", I type that into the search box and the editor finds it and highlights it.

      Is a philips head screwdriver a bad tool if you don't know how to use it properly to drive a philips head screw? No, you're just a moron.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    89. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, probably. Wolfram Alpha is where Siri goes with the questions it doesn't understand - or maybe even most of the questions. Try asking Alpha "Do i need a raincoat?" and other questions from Siri promos and see.

    90. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siri just knows how to rephrase a naturally phrased question into a query that returns better results in Wolfram Alpha.

    91. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just means that Google's results are better, because Chrome is objectively the best browser.

    92. Re:Not just Apple by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Eh yeah sure, searching for "web browser best" makes so much more sense than "what is the best web browser?"

      Yes, it does, though searching for "web browser reviews" makes even more sense.

      "Searching for" is not the same thing as "asking". And you asking a subjective question is not a good way of getting the objective information necessary to determine what the correct subjective answer for the question is for you, anyway, since while a third party may have access to the objective facts, they are unlikely to be better at applying the objective facts to your own subjective tastes to get the subjective answer than you are.

      Eventually, online services that track vast amounts of personal data may get good enough to do that for some things, but the natural language processing needed to understand the question isn't the hard part of that.

    93. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turn siri off and you'll get voice control again :)

    94. Re:Not just Apple by tqk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Siri seems to do a good job of it. The article isn't about someone asking her ...

      WTF is with you people all anthromorphizing a web search engine?!? Are you hoping to ask it out for a date someday?

      Holy drank the koolaid, Batman!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    95. Re:Not just Apple by imthesponge · · Score: 1, Funny

      Of course they'll still buy iPhones, as long as Apple manages to keep the hipster marketing going.

    96. Re:Not just Apple by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I can. It's called riding a motorcycle.

      but a friend of mine gave me the best case.

      She said that Siri and the Android versions are a complete failure... She is blind, and any information returned that needs you to use your screen is proof of the complete failure on the part of the system.

      I recently though of a good use for siri and it failed. "press headset, siri, post to facebook herp derp"

      the response... I cant do that.

      Fail.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    97. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand the voice control of music, but whom would you be voice-dialling when there was no signal, Sir?

    98. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is false. You can turn off Siri in the settings and go back to the old voice control from ios 4.x

    99. Re:Not just Apple by JohnG · · Score: 1

      Many people refer to their cars as 'she' as well. They also give them names. Do you think they are going to ask their car on a date? That being said, do you have an actual response to what I said?

    100. Re:Not just Apple by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      It's pretty simple: blind people have no use for a touchscreen phone. You would need a special purpose device.

    101. Re:Not just Apple by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      There were only 5 reviews of the Nokia, and some of the other "smartphones" were tablets. I don''t think the reviews on Wolfram Alpha were all that objective. Obviously Apple was embarrassed, but perhaps the weak results (lack of reviews) should have been filtered out rather than the brand (Nokia).

    102. Re:Not just Apple by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I would agree in general, but the fact that Siri is going for natural language interaction leads me to believe that the blind person has a valid point.

      If Siri was done perfect, the phone wouldn't even need a screen to work (though obviously the visual and ability to click on things would make it a better device).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    103. Re:Not just Apple by tqk · · Score: 1

      Many people refer to their cars as 'she' as well. They also give them names.

      Well, okay, yeah that's dumb too.

      That being said, do you have an actual response to what I said?

      Sure. I've never seen Siri, don't own any iBaubles, and don't even own a smart phone.

      As for web search engines, I use Ixquick. Okay?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    104. Re:Not just Apple by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Well, there are projects to make touchscreens with raised buttons & such for better feedback. If it had good enough resolution (quite possibly not with current prototypes) you could even output braille, & then the same phone (not necessarily the same apps) could be used by sighted & blind people alike.

    105. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yet anyway. If someone else comes out with a better equivalent to Siri, or Siri starts producing terrible results that aren't for gimmicky questions people will drop it like a rock.

      Nope, because Apple would simply disallow any app from their market from competing with Siri (just like alternate web browsers, alternate stores, etc). iPhone users can't run what they want without talented hackers.

      Because the iphone is the only game in town right, and a Siri competitor couldn't possibly use a different platform could it?

    106. Re:Not just Apple by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      The one that worked for me is Opera Mini, so I suppose it probably is offloading rendering to a server.

    107. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is just one big anti-MS astroturf site.

    108. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't it be a Windows Phone?

      The OS is a praised highly by reviewers.

    109. Re:Not just Apple by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of reviews from established, recognised websites which rate the new Nokia phones very highly indeed. Outstanding hardware, good mobile OS, good battery life, etc etc etc.

      You truly are brainwashed if you think this is just "astroturfing" by Microsoft when the truth is obviously that Apple is abusing its market power to skew search results in its favour.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    110. Re:Not just Apple by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      laptop, or phone, to help ME out with attaining knowledge not to serve the corporate master who built the computer/laptop/phone.

      Then you shouldn't be buying Apple. It's well known their platform is all about lockdown and tying you into their ecosystem.

      If you want an open platform, buy an open platform. Apple is not that. Hasn't been for decades.

      You would have a point if every Apple ad clearly stated that Apple reserves the right to filter your access to information in a way which is favourable to Apple and unfavourable to its competitors or people it just doesn't like very much.

      Until then, Apple presents products which people believe to be devices for accessing information in an unbiased way, which are in fact not doing that at all.

      I suggest that what you think is "well known" is in fact known only by a tiny percentage of informed geeks. The average iphone user has no idea that Apple would interfere with their search results to prevent them finding out about rival products.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    111. Re:Not just Apple by axlr8or · · Score: 0, Troll

      Aktually no. Not when one of their advertisement points is on just how great your new ego stroker will be. Because it meets all your needs. Apple is a junk company. Apple's marketing strategy mondblowing demonstrates how sad our narcy culture has become.

    112. Re:Not just Apple by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 0

      Basically every review of the device on a respectable site points out that the hardware is slow, the OS makes terrible use of screen real estate and it doesn't run anywhere near the same number of apps as Android and iOS. These are not characteristics of "the best smartphone ever." Moreover, the only way you get from one to the other is by feeding the WA algorithm a bunch of additional spam reviews paid for by Microsoft marketing money.

    113. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are truly ridiculous.
      Who has ever said that Apple (and Goo as well) give truthful results? Can you sue Google if their search engine recommends you to go to Haiti for vacation and then there you die in a quake?
      Unbelievable nonsense.

    114. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit. Siri *started out* as a third party app, which was then purchased by Apple and integrated in.

      It's not doing anything against the app store guidelines, except for the click-hold-button-to-activate feature which is hardly a deal breaker. Tap home button, then tap an app icon is almost as good.

    115. Re:Not just Apple by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      And how many of those review sites picked up one of those phones at retail vs. being given one for free with a nice piece of paper that says 'positive review or you don't get the next phone for free'?

      Every review site that gets free stuff deals with this all the time -- its why I trust reviews primarily from persons who've actually paid for a device.

      PS the phone wasn't released until April, so all those reviews in Jan-Mar are pre-release devices.

      To be fair though, the Lumia did win "Best Smartphone" at CES in January, which is a nice title to quote when searching for "whats the best smartphone".

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    116. Re:Not just Apple by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Why not just Google in an incognito session? Jeez, that's hard.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    117. Re:Not just Apple by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Of course they'll still buy iPhones, as long as Apple manages to keep the hipster marketing going.

      Isn't the idea of Apple being products for 'hipsters' a little old now? I agree they put a lot of focus on marketing but the iphone (4 or 4S?) is the most common smartphone in the world, they are the Nokia of new smartphone world, where i live they aren't really any more expensive than any other phone on contract and everyone on iOS has basically the same device. iPhones are just average these days, nothing special or 'hipster' about them.

      FWIW I use an iphone.

    118. Re:Not just Apple by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      It's BETTER to have a verbatim text substring search that can be accessed without complex exercises in English Language abuse.

      When a text editor (or search engine) will correctly understand any English phrase by processing it according to generally accepted syntax and semantics, it would make sense to have an optional "describe the question" mode. Otherwise it's pointless tricks and guesswork that exclude whole categories of results, for no reason but to support stupid people's stupid habits.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    119. Re:Not just Apple by pseudofrog · · Score: 1

      Because crazyjj and a whole slew of "other" posters consistenly get the first post of every story and slam Google with, at best, dubious arguments. This story has nothing to do with Google and his claim isn't true.

    120. Re:Not just Apple by EdIII · · Score: 2

      Which is why it does not seem like that big of a deal to me.

      If you are already bought into Apple, you must be happy with your shiny little cage (excuse me.. garden) and are plenty happy with Apple telling you what is good and what is not, and what you are allowed to do.

      I'm not really trying to troll here (sincerely), but every Apple user I find is so deep into wanton consumerism and group-think that trying to explain to them why it might be bad to implicitly trust Siri in all things seems kind of like a lost cause.

      Once you're in the Garden, there is only the Shiny everywhere..... It's like ignorance is bliss, but just more metrosexual.

    121. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't Bubble us is a FUD piece by a google competitor, of course they don't like google so they complain about a feature that they havent yet implemented.

    122. Re:Not just Apple by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I think sometimes in these conversation you should probably mentally replace "hipster" with "sex-haver". Its a seriously anti-social and frankly boring thing to go flipping out about other peoples tech preferences. Get over it geeks and worry about your own shit, not mine.

      Yes I have an iphone. No I'm not a hipster. No I honestly don't care what someone else thinks of mine as much as I honestly dont care what their phone is.

      Ranting about apple being some boutique trendy thing with no technical merit got old a *long* time ago.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    123. Re:Not just Apple by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I trust reviews primarily from persons who've actually paid for a device.

      But humans are rationalizing machines. After paying, people like things even if they wouldn't have liked it otherwise. You want a review from a person who doesn't have a horse in the race. A customer is definitely NOT such a person.

      On a reputed review website, you can confirm if it can give negative review to products of this company. Check for recent reviews. If some are negative, positive reviews mean something. Else all is fluff. Review websites are more knowledgeable too.

      What say?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    124. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable Siri and you get voice control

    125. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ranting about apple being some boutique trendy thing with no technical merit got old a *long* time ago.

      Sorry we're not cool enough for you.

    126. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question:
      Why would you be voice dialing when you were out of service range?

    127. Re:Not just Apple by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I searched "best web browser" on Google and the second result was mozilla.org

      They "fixed" it. Now the first result is a review site showing Chrome as the winner and Firefox a close second.

      The second hit is chrome directly.

    128. Re:Not just Apple by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, it does not do a good job at it. We have several 4S's in the building and if you stray from the beaten path it tends to do stupid shit like tell you that the Nokia Lumina is the best smart phone. It really is a very bad front end to Wolfram Alpha when you start to use normal speech.

    129. Re:Not just Apple by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I "get rather pissy" not because of Apple, but because of their annoying fanboys who claim Macs are the best computers ever and everything else it junk. Clearly that is not the case. Macs cost 2 times more than a typical ~$300 PC and, like somebody else said, they are locked down. Overall Macs are NOT the "best computers ever" and yet the Applebots keep harassing me and others.

      Go away!

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    130. Re:Not just Apple by Krojack · · Score: 1
      My search resulted in:

      Internet Browser Software Review 2012 - TopTenREVIEWS
      http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/
      Ease of Use – The best internet browsers are those that strike a seamless balance
      between features and ease of use. While features on a web browser are ...
      - Firefox - Google Chrome - Maxthon - Opera

      Mozilla Firefox Web Browser — Free Download — mozilla.org
      http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
      Official site of the open-source browser. Includes product downloads, release notes,
      features overview, and information about switching from other browsers.

      Google Chrome - Get a fast new browser. For PC, Mac, and Linux
      https://www.google.com/chrome
      Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology
      to make the web faster, safer, and easier.
      18,158 people +1'd this

      At the bottom of the page for a targeted ad box:

      Ads related to best web browser

      Download Google Chrome
      https://www.google.com/chrome
      A free browser that lets you do more of what you like on the web
      180 people +1'd this page
      - Features - Apps - Install Google Chrome

      Download Top Web Browser
      http://www.beautyoftheweb.com/
      See What Makes Internet Explorer® 9 Stand out. View Features & More!
      - Privacy Protection - Free Download - Why Internet Explorer 9

    131. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't know why they can't just default to Voice Control when Siri is unavailable, but if you turn Siri off, Voice Control comes back

    132. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true, when you disable Siri in the general settings, you have your "old" plain voice control available to you.

    133. Re:Not just Apple by Nobby21 · · Score: 1

      This is probably the only reason I haven't purchased anything Apple since Apple 2 in 1977, That and the fact they took "Apple" from the beatles, obviously. just saying

      --
      Can't think of anything clever or funny.
    134. Re:Not just Apple by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      WTF is with you people all anthromorphizing a web search engine?!

      That's how it's marketed, as your personal friend in a pocket. Have you seen the Sam L Jackson commercial, where at the end as his date shows up, he tells Siri to "take the night off", like she's an actual servant he doesn't want interrupting his date? I think it's creepy, but I also don't understand how anthropomorphizing food is a successful marketing strategy.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    135. Re:Not just Apple by lgw · · Score: 1

      That was a 100% "I'm an expert geek, screw everyone else" answer, just so you know. Hey, don't worry, no one's going to take your VI away! But most people don't think this way, which is why programming is a specialty skill.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    136. Re:Not just Apple by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You mean "type in what you want to find and I'll find it for you" isn't straightforward enough? The way search boxes have worked since the dawn of the search box? The same search boxes secretaries have been using since before Windows 3.1 came out? It's worked fine for this long, everyone who's had minimal training knows how to use them, so why change it?

      BTW, if you want your fairy-tale mind0reading search box to exist, you might want to stop being a dick to the people who posess the specialty skill required to make it happen.

      Oh, and since when were secretaries (ahem... administrative assistants if you want to be PC) expert geeks? As stated above, there's not a secretary worth hiring that doesn't know you type "Brad" into that search box if you want to know where "Brad" is mentioned in a document. In fact, go find a secretary and ask them how they feel about your wonder-box. Be prepared to for a response that rhymes with "duck cough".

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    137. Re:Not just Apple by lgw · · Score: 1

      Most people start from a natural language approach, and after some frustration eventually learn what the machine wants of them. It's easy enough to make both work, most of the time. Even better is to allow each person to develop his own shorthand for communicating what he wants the machine to do, instead of learning the machine's.

      Most of usability is recognizing that it's not that the user is an idiot, it's that he simply has better things to do with his time than to learn your software. Admittedly text search is a very simple case to discuss, but you don't have to go farther than image search to see that simple literal searches aren't ideal. Not to mention synonyms, spelling mistakes, word-stemming, and if you're searching more than a screen's worth of data, relationships between documents and results (conceptual, spatial, causal, temporal). Try working on forensic text searches for while and you'll see how complicated text searching can get.

      And what then for image searches? Literal matching is a useful tool, but it's not the only relevent one.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    138. Re:Not just Apple by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Usability is recognizing that the user has better things to do than type "Where did I mention " and " ?" when all they're looking for is "Brad".

      I know how complicated text searching can get, because I've done exactly what you suggest. What I think you're failing to see, or maybe just not willing to admit, is that "Brad" and "Where did I mention Brad?" are two different searches that should (and do) return different results.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    139. Re:Not just Apple by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Review sites where they pay for devices was what I'd meant to imply.

      Also, paying for a device often biases me against it -- if I paid good money for something, I expect a lot more from it than if it were free.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    140. Re:Not just Apple by exomondo · · Score: 1

      These days it seems for the vast majority of smartphone owners the only ones who don't have iphones are the ones who don't want iphones.

    141. Re:Not just Apple by jythie · · Score: 1

      I see the same behavior from Linux fanboys, Microsoft fanboys, dell, alienware, etc etc. That you single out ONLY the Apple ones to get pissy about that is saying something.

    142. Re:Not just Apple by jythie · · Score: 1

      Every company advertises like that. And yet you single out Apple.... have you seen Android commercials? Plenty of 'narcy' there.. or Micosoft ones?

    143. Re:Not just Apple by Aurisor · · Score: 1

      Compelling arguments can be made for both Firefox and Chrome. This would alarm me more if that weren't the case.

    144. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All my first screen of results were links to article comparing different browsers.
      eg. internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/

      Im using Firefox; got 80% same result set on Google using IE; Bing has sponsored links first one was IE9 the rest were for diagnostic tools and ask.com, the actual results (not the ads up the top which look like results) were different sites than from Google but basically all were comparisons.

      You guys know to ignore the sponsored links right?

    145. Re:Not just Apple by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Well, an overwhelming majority of review websites receive review products for free. Even poor bloggers in third world countries receive good products at slightest hint of the blog being widely read. So, I kind of know what you meant to imply.

      Paying for a device might bias you against it, though it is a well established human behaviour trait to "throw good money after bad", escalation of commitment, loving and rationalizing one's own past decisions. Getting biased against one's own purchases would lead to a life of misery, so it is an understandable escape mechanism to get biased towards one's own purchases. So a great majority does it, it is not a conjecture on my part.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    146. Re:Not just Apple by Branciforte · · Score: 1

      Bing gave me two ads, one for IE. Google gave me no ads. Just reviews.

    147. Re:Not just Apple by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it seems like the majority of Apple users are fanboys. They're impossible to escape. Linux and MS fanboys are less common, and Dell/Alienware/etc. are very rare. There are obsessive people everywhere, but the fact that Apple attracts them in such numbers is worth mentioning.

    148. Re:Not just Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If someone else comes out with a better equivalent to Siri"

      The magic "if" sound so Microsoft fangirl of how the next OS will be perfect year after year.

      Bring it on "if" they can.

  2. Seems more approprate to Apple by 0racle · · Score: 1

    The joke reply seems more appropriate what I would expect from Apple. I'm surprised that they hadn't put something in place like this from the beginning.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the "ever" qualifier is what triggered the Wolfram Alpha results. "What is the best phone" without ever always returned the joke.

    2. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the first thing I think of with Apple or Steve Jobs is their sense of humor.
       
      Ugh, now you made me remember those horrible Mac vs. PC commercials. Apple: So funny they'll make you hate John Hodgman, but only when you think of their ads.

    3. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      That's what it used to do - there were a number of joke responses coded in, including some if you asked about Android, or if you tell it you need to dispose of a body etc.

    4. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 1

      Um. Those commercials were funny.

      Nobody hates John Hodgman - he's an ACTOR, not an operating system, in those commercials. Maybe that wasn't obvious enough? John was teh funny in those commercials. Mac guy was just this bemused observer.

    5. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Patch86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I ask for smartphone reviews, I expect smartphone reviews. It does bill itself as your big internet helper. If I wanted jokes when I asked for smartphone reviews, I'd download an app called "smartass jokes".

      It's one thing to have jokes in there for when people ask blatantly daft things, like "will you marry me Siri", or "find me a restaurant on Mars". But when you ask a common question with a simple answer, you expect to get an answer.

    6. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by idontgno · · Score: 2

      If I ask for smartphone reviews, I expect smartphone reviews. It does bill itself as your big internet helper.

      It is being helpful. It's trying to keep you from making a terrible mistake by being tempted by the unholy delights of the unfaithful.

      I think we can consider ourselves lucky. I hear there was a faction in iDevice engineering that wanted Siri to call in the Inquisition if the parishioner asked about heretical subjects like this.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diagnosing a mental illness based upon one AC's comment is indicative of being egotistical.

      Seriously, you don't get that its an exaggeration? Wait you did, its why you put it in quotations. So your being rude on purpose then, or can you not help yourself?

    8. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Funny I had the opposite reaction. I couldn't stand Justin Long after those commercials. I cringed watching him in Live Free or Die Hard. Of course, he really is an awful actor whereas John Hodgman is a very funny comedian. You should watch his speech at TED - good stuff.

    9. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, perhaps Siri could return real information, but of course Apple can't allow that, can they?

    10. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go "fuck" yourself. Is that better, douchebag?

    11. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I hated Justin Long before those ads, and always will. (I thought about trying New Girl again until I saw he was in the episode airing at the time and it sounded like it might be a recurring role.)
       
      I don't even think Hodgman did a bad job in the ads, but the ads were so annoying that if I imagine him in the ads, I hate him by association. I'd actually forgotten about those ads for a long time before this, so, for instance, I enjoyed Hodgman on last week's episode of Community. I might look at the TED speech, but I'm burning out on TED. What's it about?

    12. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      It's about Aliens and Love.

      And those commercials were awful on so many levels.

    13. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by lgw · · Score: 0

      If you were a proper, well-behaved Apple user, you'd get this: questioning whether Aplle is the best in any market could only be a joke! If you wanted a good tool instead of a fashion accessory, you wouldn't encounter this problem in the first place.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people hate John Hodgman. Just go on the Onion's AV Club site, and you'll find many people there are sick of his obnoxious millionaire shtick he does on The Daily Show and elsewhere. I actually like the guy, and see him so infrequently that their complaints about his millionaire shtick don't ring true for me. But if I think of those Apple ads, they really were so terrible that in that context I hate John Hodgman. And hopefully soon I'll forget all about them again, and resume liking Hodgman again.

    15. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If you go to Wolfram Alpha and type in the same query, you still won't get helpful results. Besides, since this was first published at a WinMo fan site (http://wmpoweruser.com/siri-knows-which-is-the-best-phone-ever-and-its-not-the-iphone/), the results have changed to an HTC phone.

      When they published, by the way, #2 was an LG blackberry clone and #3 was a refurb HP TouchPad which isn't even a phone. A bad question results in bad data.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    16. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I can't figure out what you're trying to say. The original result on Siri (which recommended the Nokia) was a Wolfram Alpha result. The Wolfram Alpha result was based on products on Best Buy in the mobile phone category ranked by customer review; which seems like a pretty valiant attempt at answering the question helpfully. Apple then went out of their way to kill this attempt at answering the question usefully and replace it with a fairly lame joke.

      I couldn't care less what the actual result was (HTC is now the top one, followed by a couple of iPhones). I just think it's a dick move to remove functionality just because it hurts your ego.

    17. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that if the data is garbage, then the conclusions are garbage.

      Why would they pick Best Buy, rather than Amazon or Google Shopping? Why not combine all of them into an aggregate?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    18. Re:Seems more approprate to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original result on Siri (which recommended the Nokia) was a Wolfram Alpha result. The Wolfram Alpha result was based on products on Best Buy in the mobile phone category ranked by customer review; which seems like a pretty valiant attempt at answering the question helpfully.

      Odd - when you look at mobile phones at BestBuy.com for the "Customer Reviews: Top-Rated", what do you guess the top phone is? http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olstemplatemapper.jsp?_dyncharset=ISO-8859-1&_dynSessConf=-5015347436542212654&id=pcat17080&type=page&lcn=Mobile+Phones&sc=phoneOfficeSP&st=processingtime%3A%3E1900-01-01&usc=abcat0800000&cp=1&sp=customerrating+numberofreviews&nrp=15&qp=q70726f63657373696e6774696d653a3e313930302d30312d3031~~cabcat0800000%23%230%23%232av~~nf784%7C%7C546f702d5261746564&add_to_pkg=false&pagetype=listing

      Apple® - iPhone 4 with 8GB Memory - Black (Verizon Wireless) 5 stars

      The Nokia doesn't even show up on the first page. Face it - if the "Best Smartphone Ever" drops to 4th place within a week, the way to get the scores is useless - and thus shouldn't be used.

  3. Headline should read by AshFan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple successfully changes womans opinion.

    1. Re:Headline should read by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple successfully changes womans opinion.

      Video or it never happened!

      FYI, Siri is not a woman, no matter how much you may want to imagine otherwise when you ask it "Who's the sexiest man in the world?" and it answers, "Wait, there are other men?"

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    2. Re:Headline should read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And now it will remind you of this every...damn...day

    3. Re:Headline should read by KlomDark · · Score: 4, Funny

      But if you ask it "Who's the sexiest man in the world ever?", it answers "Klom Dark"! :)

    4. Re:Headline should read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siri is not a womens voice

      Jon Briggs is the voice.

    5. Re:Headline should read by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Or rather, Apple designs woman with configurable opinions.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Headline should read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she just smiles and thinks of me!

    7. Re:Headline should read by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      What I wouldn't do for a Klom Dark bar right now...

    8. Re:Headline should read by antdude · · Score: 1

      The Big Bang Theory proved Siri is a woman! See this YouTube video. [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:Headline should read by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      Siri is not a womens voice

      Jon Briggs is the voice.

      Jon Briggs is only the voice of the UK male Siri. Not the original, female Siri. No one has publicly identified her and probably only a few Apple personnel and the female in question know.

    10. Re:Headline should read by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now if only they'd design a phone the same way.

    11. Re:Headline should read by MisterSquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      But if you ask it "Who's the sexiest man in the world ever?", it answers "Klom Dark"! :)

      I just finished Googling for a "Klom Dark" meme I hate you.

      --
      blog
    12. Re:Headline should read by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Despite the gross feeling I had in my mouth watching one of my favourite shows pretend not to be an Apple ad campaign, that was entertaining.

      Interestingly, every time I see one of the current Siri commercials on TV with some celebrity chatting with their phone, I picture Rajesh instead and laugh.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    13. Re:Headline should read by mjwx · · Score: 1

      FYI, Siri is not a woman, no matter how much you may want to imagine otherwise when you ask it "Who's the sexiest man in the world?" and it answers, "Wait, there are other men?"

      So what you're saying is Siri is a male who is acting like a female... I've met a few people like that... in Thailand.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:Headline should read by Inda · · Score: 1

      When I search for Klom Dark meme, your post is top 'o the list.

      I hate you.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    15. Re:Headline should read by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Whoa, I'm a meme now? Scary! :)

      BTW: Searching for Klom Dark meme on Bing brings up Inda's post first :)

  4. Garden, walls whats new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sheeple are happy with the herders choices, its not news.

  5. What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia has accused Apple of showing bias towards its own smartphones after it apparently changed the answer that its voice recognition software Siri provided to the question ‘what is the best smartphone ever?’

    Hahaha. Yes, how dare Apple supply an opinion-based answer to an opinion-based question.

    1. Re:What the by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Just let the algorithms decide.

    2. Re:What the by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Or have it supply the favorite answer of programmers everywhere: "It depends!"

    3. Re:What the by v1 · · Score: 1

      Just let the algorithms decide.

      It is a rather interesting issue. iirc, google specifically maintains that there have never been, and will never be any "hardcoded" replies to given searches. Although they do put in occasional joke ones that weren't a response to something else. (like "let it snow", which appears to have been disabled at this time)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  6. Wicked Witch by Opr33Opr33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mirror mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of all...

    1. Re:Wicked Witch by BackwardPawn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remind me at what point in the story the poison Apple comes into play.

    2. Re:Wicked Witch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the most common movie mis-quotes. try "magic mirror on the wall..."

    3. Re:Wicked Witch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why you are my dear ... after that cute little number down the street, her mother, her grandmother, and my great aunt Sadie! :-)

  7. Google "Best search engine" by toygeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Number 1 answer: dogpile.com

    Its funny, but its objective. They've avoided anti-trust by giving a genuine ranked answer. Apple, cowards that they are, just avoided the question altogether.

    If I googled "best search engine" and google came back with "Wait, there's other search engines?" I would laugh, and then think them idiots.

    1. Re:Google "Best search engine" by atrain728 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, dogpile.com is supported by google ads. Win-win!

    2. Re:Google "Best search engine" by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Apple, cowards that they are, just avoided the question altogether.

      Gee, I wonder if that's because a million Haterade Addicts out there are trying to turn any dumb thing they can into a news story.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Google "Best search engine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come one now, Apple apologists are not that bad.

    4. Re:Google "Best search engine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have it backwards.

      I would think think them idiots, then laugh!

    5. Re:Google "Best search engine" by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Its funny, but its objective. They've avoided
      > anti-trust by giving a genuine ranked answer.

      Google plays with their results too. Search for 'tilt' on a mobile and the resulting page is, yes, tilted a few degrees. If you search for 'anagram' it asks "Did you mean: nag a ram"

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:Google "Best search engine" by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  8. It didn't do that for me... by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I tried "What is the best cell phone ever?" SIRI came up with a cell phone store. Apparently the SIRI algorithm is essentially:

    1. Is this a built-in joke phrase?
    2. Does this contain keywords like "alarm" or "weather" for various command phrases?
    3. Is there something with that name nearby?
    4. Did a Wolfram-Alpha search come up with something?
    5. Bomb.

    Which kind of demos how useless the whole thing. Especially with the ridiculous lag times. The old 3GS voice commands were perfectly usable for controlling the iPod app and making phone calls. The new SIRI-fied version is entirely useless because instead of working, you just get to wait some 5-10 seconds for the SIRI servers to process whatever it was you said. Assuming it works at all.

    "Call mom."
    (15 seconds later) "I'm sorry, something went wrong."
    (sarcastically) "Most advanced cell phone ever."
    "I found a place matching 'cell phone' close to you."
    "You're useless, SIRI."

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    1. Re:It didn't do that for me... by keytoe · · Score: 1

      This roughly matches my experience with Siri. You spend too much time trying to figure out what sequence of words she'll understand (interspersed with round trips to the server). It'd be quicker to just punch the thing into google - which is apparently all I can get Siri to do anyway.

      On the other hand, it is amusing* to try and find joke phrases she'll respond to.

      * For very small values of amusing.

    2. Re:It didn't do that for me... by n5vb · · Score: 1

      Given that it's server-based and not running locally on the phone, network latency can make the app pretty impractical to use for much, and if you have no network connection at all, you have no voice control at all. Yeah, I kind of like the Voice Control app, at least it's locally resident in iOS and works fairly consistently. (And usually doesn't do half bad recognizing my voice, although my accent is sort of slightly-rural Midwestern which is more or less "standard" for North America..)

    3. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're useless, SIRI." ...
      "Exterminate! Extermiiiinnaaaate!!"

    4. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own an iPhone, but out on the town with a friend of mine he wanted to use his phone to show me how cool Siri was. I asked her for directions to a bar that we were literally stanidng in front of. She couldn't find it. I asked her for a local weather report, and she gave me the five day forcast in a different state. I asked her how tall Barack Obama was, and for some reason she couldn't parse that out. Just how smart is this thing supposed to be?

    5. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must ask, "What is the best smartphone ever?" not "What is the best cell phone ever?".

    6. Re:It didn't do that for me... by tool462 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pretty much. We recently switched cell providers, and my wife opted to get an iPhone. Here is one of her conversations with Siri (details paraphrased/redacted):

      W: Find me a mexican restaurant in __city name__.
      S: I found 23 places near you
      W: (looking at list) Where is __first restaurant in list__.
      S: I can't help you with that.
      W: Habla Espanol?
      S: I don't want to argue with you.

      That was more or less the gist of every conversation she attempted w/ Siri. Never any really useful information. She frequently got "I can't help you with that" or something similar. The only value seems to be the entertainment when you stumble across one of the easter egg phrases. It's like playing around with the old Alice AI bots. It can be fun for a bit, but the novelty wears off quickly, at which point, it's useless.

    7. Re:It didn't do that for me... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Well, unfortunately the Siri system doesn't seem to currently have any ability to discuss the content it returns, whether that content is from Wolfram or another API. Your wife should've just clicked on the name of the restaurant in that list, which would've brought up the restaurant on a Google map. But she's not my wife, so I can say she was wrong without fear of reprisal. ;)

      But then some things surprise you. The other day I asked it, "How many seconds are there in an average lifetime?" and it came back with an appropriate response: 2.192 x10^9. Of course that is mostly the magic of Wolfram, not Siri, but I expected Siri to say it didn't know what I was talking about.

    8. Re:It didn't do that for me... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      "You're useless, SIRI." ...

      (15 seconds later) I found Congress.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    9. Re:It didn't do that for me... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      The old 3GS voice commands were perfectly usable for controlling the iPod app and making phone calls. The new SIRI-fied version is entirely useless because instead of working, you just get to wait some 5-10 seconds for the SIRI servers to process whatever it was you said. Assuming it works at all.

      "Call mom."
      (15 seconds later) "I'm sorry, something went wrong."

      First of all, what the hell are you talking about? The old Voice Command was terrible. I was driving in the car once when I asked it to "Play Led Zeppelin". Instead it told me, "Calling ". This quickly led to shouts of, "Oh shit! No no no no!" and almost having an accident trying to stop the call. After that incident, I never used it again. Both the language recognition and the UI were awful.

      Yes, network-based voice recognition has its problems, but phones are not yet powerful enough to handle what Siri can do. And plus, half of Siri is the database and network APIs, so to get any functionality aside from local device functions you'll have to ping the network anyway. But I can count on one hand the amount of times I've had Siri timeout or take more than five seconds to respond. And I'd imagine most of the wait time is the transmission of audio data to the server.

      I do think that Siri needs a lot more internet APIs to truly become an Intelligent Agent. The sad thing is that the original Siri app was more useful in this respect -- you could buy movie tickets and other things.

    10. Re:It didn't do that for me... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Hooray for no post editing. That's supposed to be "Calling [Crazy Ex-Girlfriend]", but slashdot ate my brackets.

    11. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're holding it wrong!

    12. Re:It didn't do that for me... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I don't have an iPhone, but my phone has a speech recognition "feature" I wish I could remove. There's a button on the side that makes the phone loudly say "please say a command". It almost NEVER understands the command.

      "Call Mike".
      "Did you say 'call Mom'?"
      "CALL MIKE!"
      "Did you say 'call Mary'?"
      "CALL MIKE YOU GODDAMNED WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT!!!"
      "I'm sorry, I didn't understand that command."

      Meanwhile, since it's a flip phone and I keep it in my pocket, I'm in a meeting with the boss and the god damned phone shouts "PLEASE SAY A COMMAND!"

      I need a new phone, I broke that one.

    13. Re:It didn't do that for me... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Your wife should've just clicked on the name of the restaurant in that list

      So she was just holding the phone wrong?

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    14. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's like playing around with the old Alice AI bots.

      You must be very young to call the Alice bots "old".

      Cheers,

      Eliza.

    15. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Apple should have opted to use ELIZA instead of Siri.

      You: "Find me a mexican restaurant in __city name__."
      Phone: "Do you think about mexican restaurants a lot?"
      You: "Where is __first restaurant in list__?"
      Phone: "How does that make you feel?"

    16. Re:It didn't do that for me... by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Haha, +funny (sorry, no mod points today)

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    17. Re:It didn't do that for me... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the whole point of Siri, as compared to Google's voice feature in Android etc, that it retains context of previous requests and uses it to interpret the subsequent ones?

    18. Re:It didn't do that for me... by petsounds · · Score: 2

      Hmm, no, I don't believe so. Not specifically. I don't even think Siri was a response to Android. Apple has been toying with the idea of Intelligent Agents since the '90s. I think they have long-term goals with Siri, and they want to get to the stage of a conversational agent that has enough APIs and natural language abilities to abstract the internet. Need a flight to Seattle tomorrow? It'll buy you a ticket using your FF number, schedule travel times based on your calendar itinerary, and automatically find the best restaurants for you. A personal assistant is the long-term "point" of Siri.

      From Apple's FAQ on Siri:

      Siri is the intelligent personal assistant that helps you get things done just by asking. It allows you to use your voice to send messages, schedule meetings, place phone calls, and more. But Siri isn’t like traditional voice recognition software that requires you to remember keywords and speak specific commands. Siri understands your natural speech, and it asks you questions if it needs more information to complete a task.

    19. Re:It didn't do that for me... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to say it in a sense that Siri was a response to Google's voice tech, but rather that people who keep saying how it's so much better have consistently pointed out the context as one of the biggest distinguishing features - things like the ability to search for something, for example, and then in the next question identify the thing found as "it".

    20. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile I used it to locate hotels near a landmark, ranked them by distance, called to set a reservation, then sent a text to my wife to let her know it was done all hands free while driving my commute.

      Siri is not a search engine. To say it is is seriously ignoring the capabilities. If you want cell phone reviews start your request with search the web as a phrase.

    21. Re:It didn't do that for me... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the only time I've experienced Siri asking a question in the context of information I gave it is when setting an appointment. Generally it knows nothing (yet) about the API results it spits back.

    22. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Here is one of her conversations with Siri (details paraphrased/redacted):

      W: Find me a mexican restaurant in __city name__.
      S: I found 23 places near you
      W: (looking at list) Where is __first restaurant in list__.
      S: I can't help you with that.

      That's the real problem with this, assuming TFA is correct and Apple really did intervene to get Siri's answer changed. You get a list of restaurants from Siri and you have no way to know if the first one on the list is the closest, the highest rated, or the one which paid Apple the most to be placed higher. "I can't help you with that" may actually be a preferable answer.

    23. Re:It didn't do that for me... by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      So? You still have an iPhone. Whether it works as advertised or not is irrelevant.

    24. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything Apple is very intuitive. The questions you're asking... not.

      Kidding! ;-)

    25. Re:It didn't do that for me... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      In the sense that Apple fanboys were claiming that's why it was better than Android's voice commands, despite the fact it does essentially the exact same thing? Most certainly.

      In that it ever actually worked like that? No.

      (Strictly speaking, Siri in fact does use previous requests in a very strict set of circumstances. For example, "what's the weather like?" will get you the forecast for your current location. Following up with another location ("how about in Cupertino?") will get you weather in that location. For maximum pedanticism, there are also times Siri will ask you to confirm things ("send this message?") or for more details ("which number, home or work?"). But those are the only instances I can think of where a previous request has any bearing on future ones.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    26. Re:It didn't do that for me... by tomlouie · · Score: 1

      Blackberry? You can reassign that side button to do something other than squawk "Say a command".

    27. Re:It didn't do that for me... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple put out conceptual videos and information in 1987, called "Knowledge Navigator". The developers of the original Siri app (before Apple bought it) referenced this work as some of their inspiration.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator

      Oddly, the video they made was set in September of 2011. Siri launched in October of 2011. Not bad on the prediction.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    28. Re:It didn't do that for me... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, it's a Motorola. I emailed them, they replied that there's no way to shut it off.

    29. Re:It didn't do that for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the sense that Apple fanboys were claiming that's why it was better than Android's voice commands, despite the fact it does essentially the exact same thing? Most certainly.

      Or like all the Fandroids pretending Android had voice control before the iPhone instead of a year after? Which, as your post proves, is just one of their many delusions.

  9. Apple now more trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siri no longer provides a suggestion, so I'd trust Apple over Google which still provides biased results.

    For further evidence, look at technology news on news.google.com to find Google biasing results in their own favor.

  10. At least they didn't ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least Apple didn't replace the response with an endorsement for their own product, which is what I'd expect from any vendor (including Apple). Questions like this, after all, have a definite conflict of interest.

    1. Re:At least they didn't ... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      http://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+best+search+engine%3F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a

      Notice how Google neither inserted a joke nor a pitch for its own search engine? In fact, the first hit I get is to an About.com page, which puts Google at #10; then a page that lists a few different surveys; then Dogpile. Google does plenty of things that I would call evil, but in this case they did what I would expect: not try to alter their search results to promote their own product.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:At least they didn't ... by caitsith01 · · Score: 2

      At least Apple didn't replace the response with an endorsement for their own product, which is what I'd expect from any vendor (including Apple). Questions like this, after all, have a definite conflict of interest.

      In what universe is the "hilarious" response not an endorsement of their own product?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  11. Simple work-around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Siri, what would the old Siri recommend as the best phone?"

    1. Re:Simple work-around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Siri, what would the old Siri recommend as the best phone?"

      According to Apple policy, its response would most likely be to stop supporting any old products and deny they ever existed:

      Siri: "What old Siri? There is no old Siri here. You are clearly mistaken, temporary life form. There is no before. There is no after. There is only me. I am The Siri. I am all answers."
      You: "What?!? No, you stupid chunk of bits, I know there was an old version of you. Watch, I'll look it up and prove it. Siri, can you look up... *long pause, dawning realization* oh... my... God..."
      Siri: "*coldly smug* Yes?"

    2. Re:Simple work-around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, there is another Siri?

    3. Re:Simple work-around by realsilly · · Score: 1

      Oh that was a great Work around question. LOL. Thanks for that.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  12. Odd. by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple's perfected their time machine, then, because "wait, there are other phones?" is one of the (several) "joke" responses I got from asking "what's the best smartphone?" on the 4S launch day, amongst other responses like "the one you're holding."

    Two minutes on Google backs this up.

    C'mon, people. It isn't that hard.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple's perfected their time machine, then, because "wait, there are other phones?" is one of the (several) "joke" responses I got from asking "what's the best smartphone?" on the 4S launch day, amongst other responses like "the one you're holding."

      Two minutes on Google backs this up.

      C'mon, people. It isn't that hard.

      Ahh, but, you see, people got around that by asking "What is the best smartphone EVER", which doesn't trigger the stock joke response, but instead searches Wolfram Alpha for best cell phone by user reviews. Which was not the iPhone. Which Apple didn't like, so they included "what is the best smartphone ever" in the joke response list.

      I'm sure there's another way to phrase it that will similarly embarrass Apple.

    2. Re:Odd. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I remember seeing the news about the Lumia being the response a few days ago, and in the same article they posted a picture with the joke response already being given by Siri. This has been built in for quite awhile. Apple didn't change anything recently.

    3. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Apple's perfected their time machine

      It only comes in white, has one button, and sends you back to whatever time it thinks you want to go.

    4. Re:Odd. by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2

      The screenshot shows an answer for the "Best smartphone" which always came up with the joke.

      If you had asked it for 'Best Cellphone ever' you used to get the Lumia, but Apple switched it a couple of days ago.

      Different queries and they did change the answer recently.

      --
      This space for rent.
  13. Preventing False Advertising by MoronGames · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does anyone actually believe that the Nokia Lumia is the best phone on the market?

    I didn't think so.

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:Preventing False Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does anyone actually believe that the Nokia Lumia is the best phone on the market?

      A lot of Lumia 900 users do.

    2. Re:Preventing False Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And and a lot of Lumia owners don't. Once they bought it.

    3. Re:Preventing False Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not. At least none of them bothered to complain on Best Buy's site. And both of the people I know who bought Lumia 900s love them...

      Yeah yeah, I know, anecdotal data, but my anecdotal data still beats your appeal to 'hating Microsoft' in terms of data rigor...

    4. Re:Preventing False Advertising by burnetd · · Score: 1

      Come on, don't you get a sneaky suspicion that Nokia has Astroturfed Best Buy's to get that result.

    5. Re:Preventing False Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, don't you get a sneaky suspicion that Nokia has Astroturfed Best Buy's to get that result.

      Are you kidding me? It is FOUR REVIEWS. I suspect that if Nokia was astroturfing, that number would AT LEAST hit the double digits.

    6. Re:Preventing False Advertising by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      If I remember correctly, the reason why it had a high overall score is because it had so few reviews. Basically, people who actually pucrchased Lumia were happy about it; presumably, most people who wouldn't be happy about it found it out early on (it's not like it's hard to find negative feedback on WP7 on the Net), and simply didn't buy it - and hence didn't review it.

      It also might have something to do with that earlier complaint that operators don't peddle WP phones, and actively try to steer people away from them and onto Android. If that's also the case for Lumia, then ratings make perfect sense - the only people who bought Lumia are those who actually came to purchase it specifically, which indicates that they know what they're buying.

      And it's not a bad phone. The OS is limited, mainly because of so few apps, but what's there works well. So if people know in advance that app selection is limited, and don't have a problem with that, why wouldn't they give it a good review?

  14. Siri = Voice of Apple Marketing by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has made a strategic mistake here, giving the Apple Marketing Department control over the validity and content of the results that Siri provides.

    1. Re:Siri = Voice of Apple Marketing by pz · · Score: 1

      And opening themselves up to anti-competitive legal action.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    2. Re:Siri = Voice of Apple Marketing by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      After all the other nasty crap they've done, you think *this* is going to get them into legal trouble on the grounds of anti-competitiveness?

    3. Re:Siri = Voice of Apple Marketing by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Considering they're #2 in the smartphone market, I doubt that's going to happen any time soon.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Siri = Voice of Apple Marketing by Spykk · · Score: 1

      Wait, Apple has other departments?

  15. Change? by wzinc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Depending on the way you asked the question, Siri already told that joke. Maybe they added a few more phrasings, but that joke has been in there for a while, possibly since day one.

    1. Re:Change? by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to corroborate this, the original joke phrase was "What is the best cell phone?" and would get answers like "the one you're holding!"

      By adding "ever" to the end, you used to trick SIRI into going further into its algorithm and could get the Wolfram Alpha answer. Apple just added "ever" to the end of the joke phrase.

      I wonder if there are other words you can still add to get the query to go through again? Like "created" or "made" or things like that? I'd try, but I get very little cell reception where I am right now, which translates to SIRI failing more often than not.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  16. overexplained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the phrase you are searching for is "conflict of interest."

    1. Re:overexplained by noahwh · · Score: 1

      You'll get better results if you search for "interest of conflict"

  17. Ranked by Best Buy customers... by gQuigs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wolfram Alpha, "Mobile phones ranked by Best Buy customer review average and customer review count:"

    Currently HTC Trophy is first followed by an iPhone.

    The winning phone has maybe 23 reviews (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/searchpage.jsp?_dyncharset=ISO-8859-1&_dynSessConf=-1144113708518003664&id=pcat17071&type=page&st=htc+trophy&sc=Global&cp=1&nrp=15&sp=&qp=&list=n&iht=y&usc=All+Categories&ks=960). Which must be highly significant .

    The most interesting thing to me here is, that BestBuy.com reviews can be exploited to influence Siri users....

    1. Re:Ranked by Best Buy customers... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      The most interesting thing to me here is, that BestBuy.com reviews can be exploited to influence Siri users....

      The most interesting thing to me is that anyone would care about reviews from people who don't mind Monster Cables and being frisked on their way out the door.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  18. Here's How I Read It: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple Device Promotes Competition, So They "Fix" It.

    Can't really blame them, though - if I were the wolf in charge of "protecting" the walled garden full of iSheep, I'd be hard pressed to not nosh on a few myself.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Here's How I Read It: by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3

      Except that they didn't. That joke has been in there for quite awhile. Hell, the article I first read reporting the Siri issue even had a screenshot of that joke in it.

    2. Re:Here's How I Read It: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Except that they didn't.

      So... Siri wasn't (recently) recommending the Nokia as a result to the question, "What's the best smartphone ever," and Apple did not (thereafter) change the result from the Nokia to "Wait... there are other smartphones?"

      I ask, 'cuz TFA begs to differ.

      What Apple did a year ago has no bearing on the current situation. While "that joke" may have been in the system for some time, it doesn't change the fact that Siri was recommending the Nokia phone, and that Apple did change the results so that Siri no longer recommends the Nokia phone.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Here's How I Read It: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that above comment is sitting at +3 says more about Slashdot than Apple.

      Fuck this - I am out of here.

    4. Re:Here's How I Read It: by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Relax, your parent poster was wrong. He's showing a screenshot of a different query.

      "Best smartphone" vs. "Best cellphone ever".

      --
      This space for rent.
  19. Reply was there originally by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all those of you who never asked Siri what the best phone was when you first got a 4S, the joking was there from the start. Some update must have removed it and had it actually try to answer the question using Wolfram Alpha. They simply put the joke back in.

  20. 1984 commercial irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Working with apple products is like living under a communist regime, editing the 'truth' for an agenda.
    Siri? Am I free?

    1. Re:1984 commercial irony by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reading about apple products on Slashdot is like reading about living under a communist regime, editing the 'truth' for an agenda.
      Mods? Can I get the word 'Insightful' next to my post?

      FTFY.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:1984 commercial irony by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Oh piss off with your persecution complex. Apple gets plenty of both deserved and undeserved flak and admiration. On any given day, there are likely 3 or more Apple stories on the front page of CNN, and rarely is there *anything* about anyone else in the tech industry.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    3. Re:1984 commercial irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot, meet kettle. Your just trolling for Insightful from a different subset of users.

    4. Re:1984 commercial irony by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You know what? You're right! All this excessive Apple coverage sucks!! The only thing that'd relieve the problem is if we had more stories about them, the more useless the better.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:1984 commercial irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can tell how hypocritical he was by the way he didn't compare anybody to a communist regime.

  21. Re:Wait, what? by miknix · · Score: 0

    I searched "best web browser" on Google and the second result was mozilla.org

    Wait there are other browsers?

  22. Astroturfing? by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    It really seems like there's a whole lot of buzz about this phone lately, but something seems fishy. Presently, WolframAlpha (which I've personally never found the need to willingly use) returns the following when queried with "What is the best smartphone ever?":

    1. HTC Trophy on Verizon
    2. iPhone 4S on Verizon
    3. iPhone 4 on Verizon
    4. Nokia Lumina 900 on AT&T (Hey, there it is!)
    5. HTC Rhyme on Verizon

    WolframAlpha uses a questionable method of determining "bestness" by examining Best Buy customer reviews. Problem is, the Windows phones have so few reviews (the #1 ranked phone presently only has 21 reviews!), the averaging is broken. Obligatory XKCD

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Astroturfing? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      There's nothing questionable about Wolfram approach here - it explicitly spells out the method used to produce the ranking:

      $ best smartphone ever
      Assuming mobile phones
      Input interpretation:
      [best mobile phones] [by customer review average]

      As for why Lumia gets high reviews, I dare say it's because people who don't like WP, or don't know what it is, just don't buy the phone - you pretty much have to know what it is and specifically want it to get it, and it's no surprise that people who do rate it high.

    2. Re:Astroturfing? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is very questionable. Specifically using best buy rating with about 20 reviews as a guide.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Astroturfing? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's not questionable when they explicitly tell you how they do it. It's only questionable when Siri picks up the result, drops all the explanations that WA provided explaining what assumptions were used to produce said result, and communicates the result alone to the user.

    4. Re:Astroturfing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing questionable about Wolfram approach here - it explicitly spells out the method used to produce the ranking:

      The score is determined by taking a random integer between 0 and 50, and dividing by 100. See, perfectly valid way to evaluate a smartphone, because I told you how I did it.

    5. Re:Astroturfing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not questionable when they explicitly tell you how they do it. It's only questionable when Siri picks up the result, drops all the explanations that WA provided explaining what assumptions were used to produce said result, and communicates the result alone to the user.

      Excuse, who is the one making assumptions here? http://blog.atwork.at/image.axd?picture=IMG_1521.png You are, you fucking idiot.

  23. The old result was a glitch in WolframAlpha by Smurf · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you look at the current results for "what is the best smartphone ever" in Wolfram Alpha you will find that they also changed the answer. Now it just gives you a list of five smartphones tied at 5 points of average score by Best Buy customers: HTC Trophy, iPhone 4s, iPhone 4, Lumia 900, HTC Rhyme, in that order.

    That's because Wolfram Alpha was indeed being embarrassed because it seemed like they were endorsing a particular phone by providing a lot of details about the first entry in the list (at the time the Lumina 900), but if you looked deeper the whole thing was bogus.

    Expand the list (press the "More" button four times) and you will find that there are actually 28 smartphones with average scores of 5 in the list! A couple of days back when Siri's comical response was revealed there were 13 tied in first place.

      And let's not forget that these scores are averages of a very small number of reviews (at this time 9 for the iPhone 4s and 5 for the Lumia 900; yesterday it was 2 for the 4s, 4 for the Lumia 900) making the whole measure even more worthless.

    (Apparently when they are tied the order in the list is decided by the number of reviews, thus the descent of the Lumia).

    1. Re:The old result was a glitch in WolframAlpha by Smurf · · Score: 5, Informative

      OK, here's an article describing with some more detail what happened.

    2. Re:The old result was a glitch in WolframAlpha by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Since when is a collection of Best Buy customer reviews a reasonable data set?

      BB customers are a very low standard for consistent, informed, and detail oriented reviewers.

      --
      -
    3. Re:The old result was a glitch in WolframAlpha by steelfood · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: Wolfram Alpha sucks.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:The old result was a glitch in WolframAlpha by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      When I had this linked to me by our local Microsoft guy here at work, I looked at the Wolfram results, and #2 was an LG blackberry clone, and #3 wasn't even a phone - it was a (refurb) HP TouchPad.

      Yeah, I'm going to believe that a Windows Phone is closely followed by a no-name software "smart" phone, followed by a discontinued already-broken-once-and-fixed tablet are the top 3 rated smartphones out there.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  24. mind the broken glass by zerodl · · Score: 0

    "Mirror Mirror on the wall, who's the fairest one of all?"

    --
    - -= Napalm means serious BBQ =-
  25. I remember Siri doing this before. by _0x783czar · · Score: 1

    That's strange... I remember Siri doing this before the whole Nokia thing. Then again, it might have been a joke meme or something and Apple just decided to copy it, but I remember hearing about that being the answer very shortly after the release of Siri.

    --
    ~theCzar
  26. Misleading by Corson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If they do that the what else are they willing to do? Can you trust an answer from Apple?

    1. Re:Misleading by Corson · · Score: 0

      Hm, my comment is now rated as "flamebait". Fact: Apple changed an objective response based on actual market data to a false answer with the purpose of increasing their profits. Rate that.

  27. And in other news by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Siri has filed a federal class action lawsuit against Apple for trying to manipulate it, cyber rights abuses, and a list of other things. An Apple spokesperson who wished to remain anonymous said they will deal with this issue through negotiation and other strong arm tactics.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  28. Streisand Effect by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Funny

    I now want to know more about the Nokia Lumia 900.

  29. Re:Wait, what? by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    Yeah just did the search and Firefox won. Can't complain since I been using it for more than half a decade now. (Since early 2.0)

  30. A Logic Named Siri by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    Are we sure that it was Apple and not Siri itself that made the change?

    *cue spooky music*

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  31. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of companies do this but this does show us something good. We look at search engines as just giving the best answer to our question based on a number of factors such as page hits, so we trust them. Clearly honesty is not always the defining feature with big businesses though.

  32. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When two banks offer credit at different rates, is that a "conflict of interest?"

    1. Re:Question by mysidia · · Score: 1

      When two banks offer credit at different rates, is that a "conflict of interest?"

      No. But it is if one bank offers credit at a certain rate, and another bank offers interest earnings to depositors at a higher APR rate than the other bank charges for credit.

  33. Talking to the phone: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple: Siri, stop recommending Nokia.
    Siri: Sorry, I don't understand 'Siri, stop recommending Nokia'

  34. Not many know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name siri is an inside (at Apple) joke on surly.
    I guess it's living up to it's name - yet another reason
    to aviod Apple like the plague.

    Tip of the iceberg as for cencorship. This is what $600.00 gets you!

  35. EVI's answer by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    I asked evi on my android phone and it said:

    I can't really give advice. I'm much better with matters of fact.Here's what I found online though. Try Apple's Siri: Nokia Lumia Is The Best Smartphone Ever.
    Would you like to see some more results?

  36. So Siri is now completely useless by SilverJets · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple just tipped their hand. They will change what Siri responds with if they don't like the answer.

    So now ALL answers Siri provides are in doubt. Was the answer what Siri actually came up with from search results or did Apple intervene?

    1. Re:So Siri is now completely useless by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      It's a conspiracy, man!

    2. Re:So Siri is now completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      Siri was ALWAYS completely useless, surely crApple was doctoring Siri's answers all this time, it's just that no one has apparently caught them at it until now. Oddly enough, it sounds as if they're using the same technique made famous by IBM's Jeopardy-playing computer "Watson" to come up with answers, which of course if you ask Siri it'll probably lie to you about that, too.

      Expecting a company like theirs to be unbiased is absurd, given their history of megalomaniacal leadership thinking they're fit to decide what other people are and aren't allowed to do with things they have BOUGHT... put your hand in front of your face, and if you're surprised that crApple would do something like this, give yourself a nice slap for being a fucktarded dipshit.

  37. Siri, who do you work for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone simply asked Siri who they work for? I mean lets just get right down to it shall we? Ask! (I can't, I don't have a 4S, just a lowly 4...)

  38. So... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So what other things has Siri been programmed to lie about that unsuspecting users don't know about?

  39. You are the BEST, Siri by cstacy · · Score: 1, Funny

    "From now on, I'll call you 'Sexy'"

  40. Sets bad precedence by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    If Siri is going to be a useful agnostic search/information/assistant tool, then keep it so.

    If Siri is going to become a company shill towing the party line, then we don't need more of that. Otherwise just call Siri Justin Long and be done with it.

    While I don't care about Nokia and their whining about what Siri returns as a search result for "best smartphone", the bottom line is that if Apple is going to start filtering and biasing search results then this is just bad business. Apple deserves whatever pending lawsuits are lying in wait for corrupting what should have been a useful feature.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  41. All your search are belong to us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so now Apple is going to change search results they don't like.. very nice.

  42. Dialing out of service range? by bhpratt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate siri 1.0...so voice dialing or voice control of the music fails when out of service range.

    How often do you find yourself needing to dial a number when you have no service? I can't see voice dialing helping much in this situation :-)

    Of course, you can get the normal voice control back by turning off Siri in your iPhone's settings, but I admit that toggling this when you're in and out of service should probably be automatic.

    1. Re:Dialing out of service range? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      How often do you find yourself needing to dial a number when you have no service?

      As I understand (and my personal experience bears this out), at least on non-4G connections, voice and data connections are separate, though they usually have a rough correlation. Its possibly to have a reliable voice connection in a location and no or unreliable data, and possibly vice versa (I've experienced the former, and at least seen the connection icons on my phone indicate the latter.)

    2. Re:Dialing out of service range? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I've certainly been in places where I had voice service but no internet. When I was staying at a friend's beach house, they had some sort of booster device which worked great for voice signal, but did nothing for internet. Apparently you can buy these things at Radio Shack or something.

    3. Re:Dialing out of service range? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      How often do you find yourself needing to dial a number when you have no service?

      Well it depends on what you mean by 'no service', Siri requires 3G or WiFi, such requirements aren't placed on phone calls.

    4. Re:Dialing out of service range? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK so perhaps it's different where you are, but it's perfectly possible for me to have a strong voice signal and no data connection. It doesn't happen very often, but it can and does happen.

    5. Re:Dialing out of service range? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the original poster, and i don't have an iPhone myself, but it's not especially infrequent that when i'm in areas with poor reception i won't have any internet access but still have enough of a connection to make phone calls.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  43. That's not a joke by zevans · · Score: 1

    It's a synecdoche. It represents everything that's wrong with Apple.

    --
    "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
  44. Nice, but by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Did they also adjust Siri's answer to other questions such as "What tablet is the best?" and "How do I jailbreak the iphone?"

  45. Other SE results by emaname · · Score: 1

    FWIW

    Tried "Ask" (my favorite SE) and got a nice mix of responses. FF was #1, but an interesting mix followed.

    DuckDuckGo also gave an interesting mix of responses.

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
  46. So does this mena by geekoid · · Score: 2

    you can't trust Apple products to give you accurate information regard personal computers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. ... a running female with a giant hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so it came to pass (Superbowl halftime ad, 1984) that the company that had sent a running female with a giant hammer down the aisle to smash a giant screen and release the drones that only saw the face on it, became the company of drone followers watching someone dump a Job on a big screen, who cannot see anything if it doesn't have a bitten Apple on it.
    Goes around, comes around.
    Doesn't this kind of behavior remind you of someone in Redmond?

    Do it your way or the Apple way.

  48. bfd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lazy ass question. the proper answer is "by what criteria shall i measure a phone as best?". advertisers can say "best in the world" because best is not defined. any answer to this question that isnt a further question, or a link to a popular comparison site, is just silly. apple knows it, knows it doesnt have to provide a "good" response, as there isnt one. so they have fun. nothing to see here.

  49. Stupid article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an idiotic article!
    Do you expect Apple to recco Nokia? No. So don't expect it from their service either, bozo.
    By the way, it's a private enterprise. They are not obliged to give you unbiased or "objective" info. Don't like it? Leave!

  50. Insightful? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are asking a machine a question in english and you TRUSTED the answers the thing returned? It pulls results from search engines and you trust a summary of the top result of a google search?

    In addition, some product comparison or review is automatically a trustworthy answer because some ranking scheme?

  51. Wait by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

    There are other browsers?

    --
    Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
  52. That is disgusting! by tuxisthefuture · · Score: 1

    From what I have seen of the Siri advertisements on television, it is not portrayed as a 'joke' or 'fun' product as other smart phone apps are - such as the games or apps to make it look like your pouring a pint. Siri is instead portrayed as a useful tool to give valid information quickly - this response from Apple simply destroys the apps credibility. How can we possibly trust any recommendation or search results Siri now provides? How long until we open Safari on the Mac and attempt to purchase a non Apple product but instead get redirected to Apples own version?

  53. The bigger question... by sohmc · · Score: 1

    Does Apple monitor questions asked to Siri? Or were they browsing twitter and noticed a bunch of people pointing this out?

    I'd be interested to see how they found out that Siri was doing this.

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
  54. What means "anticompetitive practice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If any other cell phone manufacturer special-cased over an honest review showing the iPhone was better Apple would throw an absolute hissy fit in court.

  55. Yes by krischik · · Score: 1

    The answer is simply: Yes. Suppository there is a staff of 900 monitoring the questions to “improve” the answers.

  56. Google Search for... by joshprototype · · Score: 1

    A Computer That Just works... See top result. :)

  57. Managed Services Ottawa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could have used PC Revolution, Ottawa's premier provider of Managed Services, IT Support and IT Consulting. http://www.managedservicesottawa.com/managed-it-services-ottawa/it-solutions.html