Slashdot Mirror


Apple News From WWDC and iPhone 5 Rumors

First time accepted submitter zer0point writes "Apple has just announced the next-generation Macbook Pro with a retina display. Starting today you can also order a MacBook Pro upgraded with Ivy Bridge CPUs, and Nvidia graphics. Mountain Lion got some various updates, and as expected iOS 6 was announced. In rumor news, KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote in a note to investors, 'Based on the release schedule for iOS 6 GM, there is a very good chance iPhone 5 will start shipping also in early September.'"

683 comments

  1. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yawn,

    1. Re:So what? by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Funny

      or vagina.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:So what? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone is going to come across your comment a few years down the road, and the context of your joke will be completely lost. Dear future reader: sorry, but I'm not going to fill you in on this joke either. We'll just have to see how good your google skills are (is google still around?).

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:So what? by Iniamyen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here, future reader. Although the link will probably be broken 10 minutes after this post.

    4. Re:So what? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Somebody is going to come across this whole friggin web site, sit down and go

      What the Holy Hell was exactly going on at that time?

      No wonder the whole civilization collapsed.

      So lighten up.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. that joke was lost on me and I read both articles pretty close together.

    6. Re:So what? by tom17 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Then you will get even more confused when it becomes a new internet meme and you just sit there in confusion every time you see it.

      That, or vagina.

    7. Re:So what? by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Granddad, why did western civilization collapse?"

      "Well kid, let me tell you about kdawson..."

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    8. Re:So what? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 0

      In the future, Natalie Portman will pour hot grits down your pants.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    9. Re:So what? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      If the whole of civilization collapses (thanks to the Great Apple Riots of 2034 when the iPhone 61 was released for the low low price of 2 billion dollars each), I rather think that no one will be at home sitting on the internet browsing old tech sites while their granfathers work off that flab by pedalling for electric power.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:So what? by littlebigbot · · Score: 2

      That is the best worst thing I've seen in a long time. I'm surprised they didn't sample Balmer yelling "Developers!"

    11. Re:So what? by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      3 days ago, a slashdot article by MrSeb was asking: "Where Are All the High-Resolution Desktop Displays?".

      IMHO the question is: do we ned high resolution displays for desktop computers?

      It might be that I am really getting old, since I do not understand the need.

      Cheers,
      -S

    12. Re:So what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The song is funny but the dancing sucks.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:So what? by tknd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you work in programming or anything related to graphical design or the visual arts (video included) I would say yes.

      For everyone else, maybe they can get by. The problem with our current displays is text is rendered like crap. The low resolution displays are the entire reason why sans-serif fonts (Arial, helvetica, etc) became popular. In print serifed fonts (Times New Roman) used to be popular because they had more DPI to work with. That meant fine details necessary for the font were actually printed nicely. On a low DPI (less than 100) serifs look like absolute junk. Yet a serif font in print is actually easier to read than a sans-serif font.

      So if you read anything on an electronic device, you should want a high DPI display because it will actually be easier on your eyes. Furthermore things will start to scale naturally where as right now they just turn out to be this blurry mess because we need to apply antialiasing magic to make it look right at the expensive of being blurry.

    14. Re:So what? by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

      low resolution displays are the entire reason...helvetica...became popular.

      I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt here and assume you simply experience the flow of time differently than corporeal beings.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    15. Re:So what? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they didn't sample Balmer yelling "Developers!"

      Better take away all the chairs !!!
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    16. Re:So what? by tsa · · Score: 1

      *Shakes head*
      I've been on this planet for 43 years and every time I thought humanity can't get any lower something like this happens.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    17. Re:So what? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      ... especially since the web site usually doesn't show the first post, so I have no idea what it's referencing.

    18. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing up with computers, means I actually find sans-serif fonts much easier to read even on paper.

    19. Re:So what? by cupantae · · Score: 1

      I hadn't seen this before. Best thing done at Microsoft in a while. I laughed pretty much continuously.
      People can find it unfunny if they want, but the phrase "PR disaster" just shows how unwilling people are to see anything the slightest bit different.

      --
      --
  2. Also announced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the new iDolt

  3. More Rumors by Lord+Lode · · Score: 4, Funny

    In 2013 the iPhone 6 will be released, and in 2014 the iPhone 7.

    1. Re:More Rumors by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      In 2013 the iPhone 6 will be released, and in 2014 the iPhone 7.

      You must be using the new & improved Crystal Ball app included in iOS 6! That's amazing!

    2. Re:More Rumors by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I don't think Apple will let a numeric inconsistency like "iPhone 5 released with iOS 6" stand. They'll either bump it up to be the iPhone 6, or just stop numbering them like the iPad, and call it the 2012 model iPhone. They don't do it for their other products, after all.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:More Rumors by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Personally, I don't think Apple will let a numeric inconsistency like "iPhone 5 released with iOS 6" stand.

      They let the iPhone 3G come out with iOS 2 and the 4S ship with iOS 5. That said, I do agree that they're likely to simply drop the numbering.

    4. Re:More Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're right, the year numbers are way off. Apple will redesign the calendar system in iOS 8 to end the usage of our current year numbers and start over using the release date of the original iPhone as the start of year one, and each numbered iPhone release marking the new year. As the fourth year comes to a close, I look forward to the impending simplification of our dates.

    5. Re:More Rumors by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      That solves so many problems.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:More Rumors by Sparton · · Score: 1

      That said, I do agree that they're likely to simply drop the numbering.

      While they did drop the numbering for the new iPad, I doubt they're worried about a numbering inconsistency with the device and iOS since very little of their advertising that I know of actively promotes the iOS version to general consumers (at least in terms of advertising targeting users who will buy their first iOS device).

    7. Re:More Rumors by Kupfernigk · · Score: 0

      And in 2015 they will announce iOS X, with a physical keyboard, and their share price will collapse waiting for product. (typed on a Blackberry Playbook and no, I don't believe it either.)

      --
      From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    8. Re:More Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in 2013 the iPhone 5s will be released, except in Australia where it will be called the iPhone 5 + Cellular

    9. Re:More Rumors by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Wait, no, you're wrong, in 2013 it will be the "new iphone" and in 2014 it will be the "really new iphone".

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:More Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be using the new & improved Crystal Ball app included in iOS 6! That's amazing!

      There was an event, a MWSF keynote IIRC, where Steve Jobs was demoing video editing or something and just used gag content, but it was about him carrying something like a ten inch iPod under his arm. That was long before the iPad.

      It's just one more fun thing to hunt down a clip of. That and the Mac/PC ad where both Mac and PC did videos, and PCs video was a harry guy in drag. It was funny!

    11. Re:More Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be called....THE NEW IPHONE **Angelic voices in the background ***

    12. Re:More Rumors by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      That solves so many problems.

      first-world problems, that is...

    13. Re:More Rumors by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      No, mostly second-world problems. It would allow the Chinese to finally eliminate the duopoly of their traditional calendar and the Gregorian one in favour of a new, uniform system that better reflects the reality of economies the world over. (Because, you know, every country is 100% iPhone. True facts.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    14. Re:More Rumors by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. what does china or gregorian have to do with apple?

    15. Re:More Rumors by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      The Apple Calendar would replace the Chinese and Gregorian calendars with a uniform, modern system built on the one thing that unites us all: an unswerving devotion to the memory of Steve Jobs, the greatest computer scientist in history.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    16. Re:More Rumors by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that he's the greatest... There was just a slashdot post on Alan Turing, for example.

    17. Re:More Rumors by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Oh so you are the guy that bought a playbook....

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    18. Re:More Rumors by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't think Apple will let a numeric inconsistency like "iPhone 5 released with iOS 6" stand.

      They let the iPhone 3G come out with iOS 2 and the 4S ship with iOS 5. That said, I do agree that they're likely to simply drop the numbering.

      Not until iPhone X, then it will be iPhone lion, iPhone snow leopard, etc. Love Apple product numbering

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    19. Re:More Rumors by tsa · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is Alan Turing?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    20. Re:More Rumors by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      typical that the TSA would have such an ignorant comment...

    21. Re:More Rumors by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      All of these posts have been sarcastic. I'm so sorry.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    22. Re:More Rumors by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      In 2013 the iPhone 6 will be released, and in 2014 the iPhone 7.

      No, they're just going to call it "New iPhone", like they did with the iPad. That way they can keep using the same boxes when new products come out.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  4. ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) la by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) laptop.

    Face it wifi is not all over the place and Ethernet is faster, has more security, work better in some places, ect.

    I was just in a hotel with in room cable modems hooked to the tv system with Ethernet and Poor wifi in room.

  5. no 17" laptop??? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People do need bigger screens and have walk round with a laptop + display is a hard and you need to power that display as well.

    1. Re:no 17" laptop??? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The technology presumably isn't ready for an affordable 17" retina display this year.

      And having a 17" with a significantly lower resolution than the 15" wouldn't make for a rational product line.

      Expect 17" with retina display to be next year's flagship product. In the mean-time, anyone who really needs a current-as-of-yesterday resolution 17" MBP will no doubt find some vendor with them still in stock at a discount.

    2. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt that it'll be back next year. By all accounts, it was a poor seller. All of the non-retina models, with the exception of the 17", just got updates and will be continuing to be sold alongside the new retina model. The 17", meanwhile, is nowhere to be found. That's a good indication that it's a dead product and won't be making a return. Demand for an Apple laptop that large simply isn't strong enough.

    3. Re:no 17" laptop??? by mozumder · · Score: 0

      I've always bought the 17" (from power book G4 to last year's Sandy Bridge), not because of it's big display, but because it always had the highest pixel count for my photography work. Another exclusive of it was the Firewire 800 port, which was used by very specific people. The 17" model was always targeted at a specific pro market that needed these specific features, even though it was always a little too big to be practical.

      The new 15" with Retina Display & firewire dongle pretty much nullifies the need for the old 17" model at this point, which I don't expect to return. The only thing the 17" model would do at this point is add bulk, which is not helpful.

    4. Re:no 17" laptop??? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      screw the 17", I really wanted a 13" with a retina display. To add insult to injury, they removed the 13" model with a dedicated nvidia graphics card :(

    5. Re:no 17" laptop??? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. Neither that it's unpopular "by all accounts". Nor that the disappearance this year means it's a dead product for the future. As I say, it's just that a standard res 17" won't sit well in a rational single product range alongside a retina 15".

      Remember one of the early things Jobs did when he returned to Apple was rationalise the product range. To remove difficult product decisions. Better to have a clear top of the range than to have people wondering whether the 15" retina or the 17" standard res is the top of the range.

    6. Re:no 17" laptop??? by fortfive · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They couldn't even put out a 13" pro with same res as the 13" Air?!

    7. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your idea regarding product differentiation, but I think that's simply a good excuse for cancelling a model that doesn't sell well. Note that the linked analysis was given back in April, and it correctly identified both the cancellation and the presence of a new model that has a different form factor than the current MacBook Pro. If his numbers really are accurate, there's no reason to bring it back as an ultra-high-end model later, especially considering the fact that the current retina model commands a premium over the previous models, rather than coming in at the same price point.

    8. Re:no 17" laptop??? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting. A spot on prediction from 2 months ago. But analysing sales can't possibly have given him his prediction of a new laptop type between the Air and the MBP. It seems more likely there was a leak from manufacturers on what the new product range was.

      Which means that the estimated sales figures may have some from the information that the model was disappearing, rather than the other way around.

      Don't get me wrong, I have no idea how well the 17" sold, and I'm sure the cheaper, smaller models sold more quantity. But this is the first Ive heard that it was selling so badly, so that's why I disputed your "by all accounts".

    9. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      This.

      The group of people I know who most consistently walk around with 17" MBPs are video editors...i.e. one of Apple's long standing demographics and the ones who purchase products like the $1,000 Final Cut Pro production suite.

      17" is on the outer edge of practical for a frequently flying salesman, but it's a whole lot more practical than an editing bay when you need to capture footage in real-time (where FireWire is still a mainstay). Even if you're not capturing in realtime, Adobe OnLocation provides digital equivalents of waveform monitors and vectorscopes for calibrating cameras without having to lug lots of other equipment on site.

      Similarly, I wonder how the lack of an optical drive is going to go down. Cue all the people saying "zomg optical media is dead!!!11". To you, I say, "ask a married woman who has gotten married in the past decade whether she had her wedding videoed by an event videographer. Ask her if she got the final product. Ask her how she got it." There will be three possible answers:

      1.) VHS (if the woman was married in 2002 and didn't yet have a DVD player).
      2.) DVD.
      3.) Blu-Ray (if she got married within the past 2-3 years and likely paid extra and/or specifically hired the videographer in large part due to Blu-Ray capability).

      You will NOT find a woman who would be alright with a "wedding Youtube upload". The fact of getting a tangible product is just as important as the content being provided. Similarly, I've done videos for a few churches who have wanted either DVD or a DV-AVI formatted video. The latter of which was frequently impractical to send over the internet in any reasonable length of time.

      Ultimately, I question how much longer the creative pros I know will stay on the platform, as the amount of extensions requires grows larger to accommodate established workflows.

    10. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, he didn't start from the sales numbers to arrive at the prediction of a new model. Rather, he started with the premise of a new model (which has been a rumor now for a number of months), and tied it to the sales numbers to form a cohesive idea. I find it doubtful that he arrived at the sales numbers in a backwards manner, since he provided estimates for a number of models, most of which were not discontinued, meaning that he couldn't have made estimates for them based on knowledge of models disappearing.

      As you and I agree, the 17" getting dropped makes sense for streamlining the product line, and that's what the analyst cited as well. The sales numbers merely reinforce that idea, and while he doesn't say that they won't make a return later, I see the sales numbers as being indicative of that. That said, I'll readily admit that it's opinion on my part.

      Regarding disputing my statement, thank you! I wish more people would do so, since I hate it when people let me repeat something that's incorrect without correcting me. In this case, I did have a basis for what I said, but challenging those sorts of things is always important.

      This isn't the first that I had heard of the model selling poorly, but it was the most recent time prior to today that I can recall it having been said. It's always been a bit of a niche product thanks to its size and price tag.

    11. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm curious about is how many external displays it will support. It has 2 Thunderbolt ports plus an HDMI port. If it supports more than one external display I'm for one MORE than happy to deal with the smaller built in screen.

    12. Re:no 17" laptop??? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you're talking about. The previous 13" model GPU was described as "Intel HD Graphics 3000 with 384MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory", it had no Nvidia card.

      The old core 2 duo had the Nvidia 9400 thing, but the Intel 4000 stuff in the new one is pretty significantly more capable than that.

    13. Re:no 17" laptop??? by jaak · · Score: 1

      Just think, very soon now you won't be able to get a Mac laptop with a 17" screen or Blu-Ray.

    14. Re:no 17" laptop??? by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      they dumped the 17" completely... it was less that 1% of the 13" and 15" sales. can you blame them for not catering to you, specifically? The retina macbook has more than enough pixels and all the ports you need.

    15. Re:no 17" laptop??? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      Oh, if only I had mod points for you...

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    16. Re:no 17" laptop??? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Oh noes! They've lost the recent bride who doesn't have a DVD player under the TV market.

      Seriously, if it's for low volume duplication of Bluray discs, such as a wedding videographer had a need for, an external DVD drive which lives on the desk of his office will be fine. And also more reliable, and easier to replace.

      Face it, it's a fringe activity. The use of physical media for video is on it's way out, other than for brides who need that physical item to be emotional about.

      And if they lose a few wedding videographers, it's not as many people as they'll gain from the mainstream for having an ultra-light laptop.

    17. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rumor sites have expected this for a while and the reason was 17 inch sales are tiny and not worth continuing

    18. Re:no 17" laptop??? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      after some digging i found out that apple replaced the nvidia chips in the 13" line some time ago. I guess nvidia wasn't able to make it's gpus small enough. Maybe they never did have dedicated graphics in the 13". I have one of the white plastic macbooks with an integrated nvidia gpu. My brother has the following generation unibody 13" pro and i swear he has a discrete nvidia gpu with the powersaving integrated intel chipset in it. I may be mistaken.

    19. Re:no 17" laptop??? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      You will NOT find a woman who would be alright with a "wedding Youtube upload". The fact of getting a tangible product is just as important as the content being provided.

      I don't see that this is a big issue. An external DVD writer only costs about £20 and if all you are using it for is burning copies of the final product for clients then it makes sense to have it as an external drive rather than adding to the weight and battery drain of the laptop itself.

    20. Re:no 17" laptop??? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      How about a USB stick?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    21. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to be, back when media professional used macs. Now that Apple has told them to bugger off because they only want consumers to use their devices, not professionals.

    22. Re:no 17" laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      17" quadHD

  6. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    People that already carry a ethernet wire are really not going to have a problem carrying a dongle too. I love wired , I jsut finished wiring up my house for ethernet, but this move makes sense for the people that arent us.

    --
    Good-bye
  7. OMG OMG OMG OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean a product that is released every year is going to be released again this year? This is very exciting and unexpected news.

    1. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You mean a product that is released every year is going to be released again this year? This is very exciting and unexpected news.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, some people may have speculated that there would a product released some time in the future, but no one knew that it was going to be a phone or that it would be called "iPhone 5". It is interesting because the name may refer to either the phone's capabilities or the perception that Apple is going for. Now the bloggosphere will be atwitter with speculations about what the "5" means.

    3. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but haven't you heard? The shape might be slightly different this year!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by MalachiK · · Score: 1

      I heard that it was going to be transparent... and shoot laser beams.

    5. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Huh? The 17" 2880 x 1800 display is breakthrough. I don't remember another time, ever, when one manufacturer had such a clearly superior laptop to everything else on the market.

    7. Re:OMG OMG OMG OMG by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the iPhone 5 rumors.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  8. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) laptop.

    Face it wifi is not all over the place and Ethernet is faster, has more security, work better in some places, ect.

    I was just in a hotel with in room cable modems hooked to the tv system with Ethernet and Poor wifi in room.

    Yes, added cost, but consider that you're buying with that extra cost a thinner laptop (because it didn't have to be included) and the option of NOT carrying it around. I've found that I almost never need either the display adapter or the ethernet adapter, so I don't have to carry them around if I don't need them (I have an Air). For me, the thinness is worth it. You could just as easily say that the base model, with no dongle, gives people who don't need the dongle(s) the opportunity to buy a slightly cheaper Macbook - thus, it is a price discount for them, rather than an extra cost for us.

    Not everyone likes this, of course, but that's why you have the option of buying other notebooks.

  9. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll take an ethernet dongle and smile if it's attached to a 15.4" laptop with a 2880x1800 screen.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  10. Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't like the idea of having proprietary SSD chips built on the motherboard. It makes it impossible to upgrade. I prefer the 2009 vintage MacBook Pro that I'm using now. I can upgrade the RAM and/or HD (which I've done). I can take out the optical drive and put in an SSD for the OS and keep the other HD for files (which I've also done). Too bad I can't put more than 8GB of memory in it though. Not everyone will choose to do what I've done but the point is that you have the choice. The current generation of MacBooks take those options away from you. The good news is that my MBP is still running like a champ and probably won't have to be replaced any time soon. The bad new is that it's probably the last MBP that I'll buy. It's the same reason I switched from an iPhone to an Android. There is no way to expand the storage on the iPhone. With the Android I just pop in another SD card.

    1. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      I don't like the idea of having proprietary SSD chips built on the motherboard. It makes it impossible to upgrade.

      If it's like the Air, they are not soldered to the motherboard, they are on a small (proprietary) daughtercard. So it's not impossible to upgrade, just annoying and expensive. I guess that's the trade off for a 0.7" thick, 4.5lb laptop... no one buys Macbooks for their low price and ease of upgrade...

    2. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Apple. They've perfected forced obsolescence.

    3. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like the idea of having proprietary SSD chips built on the motherboard. It makes it impossible to upgrade.

      The you will love the new MacBook Pro because the SSD aren't built into the motherboard at all.

    4. Re:Nice specs...but.... by alen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mac's hold their value so well that its better to sell and buy a new Mac than to keep and treasure a computer for many years and upgrade it

    5. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm posting anonymously due to having already moderated on this thread. I figured I'd better respond rather than down-modding you ;-)

      As I just noticed a sibling has mentioned to you, you can buy SSD upgrades for the MacBook Air, and I have to assume you'll be able to do the same for the new MacBook Pro. Check out http://www.macsales.com if you care.

      Also, you don't seem to realize that Apple is STILL SELLING the existing MacBook Pro. This is a brilliant move that lets people like you continue to upgrade to big bulky legacy models as long as you bother to learn that that options is still available. Apple can use this to gauge market interest on the old vs. new models and tailor future products accordingly.

      Like you, I've also replaced my 2012 MacBook Pro optical drive with an SSD. Unlike you, I would absolutely, 100%, have bought this new model if it was available a year ago.

    6. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      It seems we are well into a new era where miniaturization is being done via use of proprietary components and non serviceable products. This works great for products that are just bought by non techie consumers, but people that would like to upgrade their components rather than throw the whole thing away are out of luck.

    7. Re:Nice specs...but.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      If you need 16GB of memory, buy it with 16B of memory in the first place.

    8. Re:Nice specs...but.... by boristdog · · Score: 0

      I'll admit that a thin, light laptop is really freakin' awesome for transport, but Apple isn't the only one that has them, though they do a great job of making people think they do.

      Two years ago I bought a Dell Vostro 13.5" notebook for $350 (brand new - $30% off sale on model being phased out) that is made of aluminum, is 0.65 inches thick and weighs about 3.9 lbs. Has all the usual ports, too, just no CD/DVD.

        Don't know why, but Dell decided to make the next model that replaced it slightly thicker and heavier. Maybe Apple paid them off?

      But hell, pay a few grand for a light notebook if it makes you happy.

    9. Re:Nice specs...but.... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      With the Android I just pop in another SD card.

      Umm, isn't this just a subset of the Android phones out there? I only pay attention to the CNET videos of the zillion Android phones out there, and AFAIR, nowhere near all of them have a SD slot for more memory.

    10. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modularity only makes sense in certain cases. For mobile devices it currently does not.

      Modularity means adding plastic, metal, connectors, standards, points of failure, weight for the sake of making a part interchangeable. Instead of having a modular device we have tightly integrated devices fast processors packed to the gills with flexible features.. And enough raw performance to implement the rest of what we want in software. (If you pay attention to apple history, this is pretty much the hallmark of apple design - Starting with Woz's early software based hacks that made personal computers affordable to begin with. Floppy drives with a handful of ICs instead of dozens, etc.)

    11. Re:Nice specs...but.... by MSG · · Score: 1

      That hasn't been true since the move away from PowerPC. Have you tried to actually sell an Apple computer lately?

      If anything, Apple computers are harder to sell, since most of their target market is hooked on "the latest thing."

      Apple products used to hold their value because of their relatively short supply. There's more than enough used equipment to go around, these days.

    12. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I bought my computer, I needed 4GB of memory. Now it's 5 years later, and i needed 8. I figured i'd go a little over, and got 12. The cost to replace was the cost of the memory, not the cost of a new computer. I also had my mobo die on me. Bought a new one. I've replaced my processor too when that got old. It's cheaper and easier to buy individual components as they age than to buy a new computer each time you need something new. If I've upgraded my computer three times, I've saved myself almost the cost of 3 computers (minus the specific cost of the components).

    13. Re:Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Yes you're right. My particular phone is the Samsung Galaxy II, which has a slot for an SD card.

    14. Re:Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the problem is that the MBP I have won't take more than 8GB of memory. The max is 8.

    15. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, because in the computing industry, it's SO easy to tell how much RAM you'll need 5 years down the road.

      Why not cut to the chase and just require that the laptop you get today have 200 gigs of RAM to avoid any problems for the next decade. Maybe.

    16. Re:Nice specs...but.... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Macs hold their value because people think they do.

      That's how everything holds its value.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    17. Re:Nice specs...but.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well that's not a criticism of the new MBP then. It can take 16GB.

    18. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Macbook Pro 2009 (13"), and I don't like that one of the memory slots has suddenly failed, and now I am limited to 4GB. I think it sucks. If the same thing happened with soldered in SSD drive - that would just be a disaster.

    19. Re:Nice specs...but.... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Don't know why, but Dell decided to make the next model that replaced it slightly thicker and heavier.

      Didn't Apple do that with their latest ipad?

    20. Re:Nice specs...but.... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      They tend to cost >2x as much as a comparable (or better) laptop...

      Prove it. I bet you can't. Build a truly comparable machine and I bet you can't get it to half the price of a Mac (nor even close to half the price).

      Or just keep spouting that lie because I'm sure some people believe you but anyone with a clue knows it's a lie.

    21. Re:Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      If you look at it on a strictly component by component basis then I can see why someone might think they are twice as expensive as a comparable Windows based PC. With Apple it's really a sum-of-the-parts type of argument. The build quality is excellent. Apple consistently ranks at the top in customer satisfaction, fewest returns per units sold, etc. The OS is very elegant and, since it's UNIX underneath, very powerful as well.

    22. Re:Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Correct. My only gripe with the new MBP is how the SSD chips are done. Others have pointed out that it is in fact possible to upgrade the SSD chips, albeit expensively. I suppose I could always get an external drive and carry it with me or use cloud storage for files that I don't need often. The more I read this thread the more I'm liking the new MBP...and that retina display is out of this world. Now if we could just get reasonably priced Thunderbolt peripherals I'd be in heaven :-)

    23. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on a component by component basis a Mac isn't twice as expensive. Not even close. A Mac is only slightly more expensive than a component by component comparable machine but only slightly, not double. And you don't have to build it and it comes covered by a warranty.

    24. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs hold their value because people think they do.

      That's how everything holds its value.

      Exactly, and if people ever get wise that value might plummet. Like it did with houses or dot-com stocks.

    25. Re:Nice specs...but.... by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell there is no way to upgrade anything in the new Macbook Pro including the SSD and RAM.

    26. Re:Nice specs...but.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can update the RAM. I would be shocked if that wasn't the case. Evidently (according to others on here at least) you can upgrade the SSD chips on the new MacBook Pro. It won't be long before someone tears one apart and we can see for ourselves. I imagine that the combination of the SSD with the new CPU will make it a real screamer.

    27. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the poster above about being surprised that apple is releasing something on their normal schedule, I am completely surprised that apple would consider something proprietary and non-user-replaceable. (Like an iPhone battery).

    28. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "Yaeh I dint lyke DVD becuz you can reocord realtime w/ VHS, so fcuk blueray."

    29. Re:Nice specs...but.... by rhook · · Score: 1

      Thinkpads tend to hold value.

    30. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Macs are usually able to take larger memory modules than were available at the time of release.

      He probably bought a pre-Sandy bridge MPB just over a year ago. Pretty sad for a not-even-18-months-old line to be limited to 8GB, but that's Apple for you.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    31. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need 16GB of memory, buy it with 16B of memory in the first place.

      This is to Apple's advantage, as margins are higher for the add-in, and OEM prices are declining, and with some user needs expanding into the larger capacity range as the product ages, the advantages to Apple increase over the product lifetime.

    32. Re:Nice specs...but.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Can't you read? I specifically said pre-sandy bridge. ie. Any model of macbook sold prior to the 24th of Feburary 2011.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  11. Retina Display is good and all, but... by Cyrano+de+Maniac · · Score: 2

    The MacBook Pro with a Retina Display of 220ppi sounds great, but I have a serious question.

    Has Apple fixed the problem with the system font being sized in a fixed number of pixels? My parents' 17" MBP with hi-res display is almost unusable with my parent's aging eyes (or even my middle-aged eyes), and it doesn't have a ppi anywhere near 220. I'm incredulous that Apple has allowed this UI flaw to persist for so long -- my parents cannot be the only ones who would appreciate a larger system font.

    --
    Cyrano de Maniac
    1. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The point of the "retina display" resolution is that everything is doubled. 2880x1800 is going to work effectively like 1440x900. Fonts are rendered at twice the size, images are twice the size, etc.. You're not going to be looking at tiny windows with tiny fonts, you're going to be looking at normal sized windows with normal sized fonts that look much smoother - almost print like. The higher resolution just allows much more detail.

    2. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by franciscohs · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with this, in fact, not seeing a font/UI scaling feature in Mountain Lion hinted me that they would probably wouldn't take the obvious "retina display" step on laptops soon. I was wrong thou, and although I would be the first one to buy a very high res display, I wouldn't do it if they don't allow me to scale the UI. I bought the Air as my first Mac laptop and one of the decisions that almost made me not buy it was font size. Even with excellent eyesight, fonts are marginally acceptable and I had to change font size for multiple applications to feel comfortable.

    3. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Microlith · · Score: 2

      I'm disappointed if that's how it's actually going to work. I guess Apple hasn't gotten resolution-independent UI scaling down either.

    4. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's how it works on the iPhone and iPad, so it follows that it's how it will work on the Macbook Pro. That said, an application which supports the higher resolution display might be able to scale down so that you can fit more things on the screen, if that's what you want. I'm thinking particularly of terminal windows, but browsing could work too.

      Apple has had resolution-independence for a while, but developers haven't been using it (from what I understand.)

    5. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Glock27 · · Score: 1

      That's how it works on the iPhone and iPad, so it follows that it's how it will work on the Macbook Pro. That said, an application which supports the higher resolution display might be able to scale down so that you can fit more things on the screen, if that's what you want. I'm thinking particularly of terminal windows, but browsing could work too.

      Apple has had resolution-independence for a while, but developers haven't been using it (from what I understand.)

      Apps will require work and a new release to support the new display. Pictures, for instance, can use the full retina display resolution, so you'll be able to see a lot more of your full-res dSLR photo on screen at once. I expect the system font will be a bit smaller due to the sharper text.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    6. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is to say, in response to GP's actual question - the text size will be exactly the same as the older MacBook Pro, and it will still not be adjustable. So if it's too small for you today, it'll remain too small. No resolution independence is coming.

      OS X: if you can't see shit, your vision is not good enough for Apple products.

    7. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking about resolution the wrong way, it is no longer about X + Y pixels it is about pixel DENSITY! PPI / DPI.

      That is the real resolution, you are the one with it arsewards, not Apple. Apple is doing it right.

    8. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly what we all needed. 900p resolutions aren't found anywhere under 17 inches TODAY, and you must pay a price premium to get a bundle of other things in a laptop that is useless as a "portable."

      Can't wait for Wintel manufacturers to soon try to meet retina displays halfway and produce the forbidden 13.3 inch display @ 150dpi. It's annoying that any point and shoot camera creates images that MUST be *distorted* by DOWN-scaling when you actually try to view them anywhere or set as wallpaper (it some geeky work to fix that and to crop standard 4:3 snapshots to acceptable 16:9 because our monitors will otherwise have to scale SOMETHING.) The point made in the presentation that you can enjoy a 1080p video in a small window-like area of your screen at full sizes would definitely be great. Reminds me of that long period where we expected to work with small 640x480 and smaller wmv and mov windows prior to flash's prime in the SVGA days.

    9. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      OS X: if you can't see shit, go to System Preferences -> Universal Access -> When using this comuter, I would light assistance with "seeing", and turn on any one of voiceover, screen zooming or colour inversion, or enhanced contrast ;)

    10. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Zooming is a very poor substitution for DPI scaling. It's like reading a book with a magnifying glass, when what I actually want is for text to simply be bigger everywhere (and reflow to still fit to screen).

      If you want to see what I mean, take an OS that can actually do that (Windows Vista/7, or pretty much any Linux DE) and see what happens when you adjust DPI in settings.

    11. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious what the reported resolution of the display to the machine is going to be, I have the iPad 3 and safari claims it's running at a resolution of 1024x768.

    12. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Everything that isn't written in .net breaks, including half of windows' own components... I'll take zooming thanks.

    13. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Everything that isn't written in .net breaks, including half of windows' own components

      Have you actually used DPI scaling in any Windows version newer than XP? I routinely use it at 150% DPI, and not a single window or dialog coming from the OS itself breaks. Nor do any of the apps that I use.

      I also love how you had conveniently omitted Linux, where both Gtk and Qt apps work just fine with DPI scaling.

      Anyway, surely Apple, being all that awesome, can do it better than MS can?

    14. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyway, surely Apple, being all that awesome, can do it better than MS can?

      Fucking NeXT did it better than Apple, but they took out all the configurablity and many of the features (including device independence) when they turned it into OSX. I've heard a rumor that device independence is coming back but I don't know for sure either way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by catmistake · · Score: 4, Funny

      The MacBook Pro with a Retina Display of 220ppi sounds great, but I have a serious question.

      Has Apple fixed the problem with the system font being sized in a fixed number of pixels? My parents' 17" MBP with hi-res display is almost unusable with my parent's aging eyes (or even my middle-aged eyes), and it doesn't have a ppi anywhere near 220. I'm incredulous that Apple has allowed this UI flaw to persist for so long -- my parents cannot be the only ones who would appreciate a larger system font.

      Yes, Apple has a solution for you. It's about time you upgraded those aging parents for new shiney Apple parents! Your children are likely due for a parent upgrade as well.

    16. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Apple has been working resolution independence into OS X for years now. Things that don't take advantage of the higher res may be doubled, but I think a lot of UI elements and such will be built to take advantage of the resolution without doubling.

    17. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theirs is actually pretty good, OS X had a lot of the UI designed for resolution independence from the start. Microsoft's UI is also much better at scaling since Vista.
      It's the third party applications that cause a lot of the issues on both platforms.

      It makes the platform look bad if it scales perfectly, untill you run apps on it that look broken.

    18. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      That's been a rumor for nearly ten years now. It's not going to happen any time soon. Why? LCD/LED/OLED displays only look good at native resolution 2n multiples of native resolution. That is a simple fact. So it doesn't make any sense to have resolution independence in the UI when the only resolutions in use are 2x and 1/2x for a limited number of displays (which Apple controls to a large extent).

      BTW, you still get all the pixels so you can zoom in on an image and see more detail or zoom out and still have good detail.

      Think about it a little more and all will be clear.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    19. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet there are 2 definitions of 'retina'

      The ipad 3 at 264 pi

      The new MacBookPro at 220 ppi

    20. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they said Photoshop will be updated to use the new retina displays... How exactly are they updating it, I understand the new display will be useful to view photos in higher details, but apart from that... new, larger icons for Photoshop's toolbox?

      Another app mentioned in Autocad, but is anyone using Autocad for serious work on a 15.4" screen? Every professional user of Autocad / 3DS Max etc is using one or more 30" screens.

    21. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I expect the system font will be a bit smaller due to the sharper text.

      Fonts have been traditionally measured in points.
      A point is 1/72 inch. This is a physical measurement independent of computer displays. A computer screen should therefore render a 12 point font as 1/6 of an inch.
      The number of pixels required to measure a point will change with dpi but the size of the font shouldn't.

    22. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Assuming Apple exists in a vacuum.

      Here Android and Windows might be forced to rise to the challenge forced by multiple vendors at multiple screen sizes.

      Further, I'm sure it's a request the publishing community have been making for some time as they seek higher fidelity between the printed page and the screen.

    23. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      LCD/LED/OLED displays only look good at native resolution 2n multiples of native resolution. That is a simple fact.

      Not any more. With a retinal display, by definition, arbitrary scalings will look just fine. Just as nobody worried about setting their CRT to a multiple of the dot pitch.

    24. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by geggo98 · · Score: 1

      I expect the system font will be a bit smaller due to the sharper text.

      [...] The number of pixels required to measure a point will change with dpi but the size of the font shouldn't.

      I think what he meant was: They might reduce the size of the fonts. On a sharper display, a 10 point font might be as readable as a 12 point font on a not so sharp display.

    25. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Uh, OS X has had resolution independence for years. One of the tools installed with XCode lets you alter the DPI settings on a per-app basis, so you can make individual apps bigger or smaller, but by default it's set to a fixed size based on the display.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bresink.com/osx/TinkerTool.html

      This free application allows you to alter the system font and size

    27. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by fastasleep · · Score: 1
    28. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by fastasleep · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be doubled. See. from this.

    29. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Uh, OS X has had resolution independence for years. One of the tools installed with XCode lets you alter the DPI settings on a per-app basis, so you can make individual apps bigger or smaller,

      Have you tried using that? It breaks half of OS X stock apps. Heck, it even breaks the main menu in some cases.

      Quartz has resolution independence, yes. But OS X as a whole is not prepared for it, which is likely why they never exposed that setting in the UI.

    30. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple has a solution for you. It's about time you upgraded those aging parents for new shiney Apple iParents(TM)! Your children are likely due for a parent upgrade as well.

      FTFY :P

    31. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by rhook · · Score: 1

      DPI scaling in Windows breaks quite a few apps written in VB.net. I'm sure it breaks other things as well. Drove me crazy trying to figure out why my apps were not displaying the way they were designed on my laptop until I found out that the DPI was set to 125% out of the box (Thinkpad with the FHD display).

    32. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no definitive information out yet, if you'll be able to choose system font size in OS X 10.8, it does seem unlikely though. However, you can influence the scaling (at least on the Retina display), so things might get a bit better for your parents in the future.

      Article: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5998/macbook-pro-retina-display-analysis
      Scaling dialog: http://images.anandtech.com/doci/5998/Screen%20Shot%202012-06-11%20at%204.29.36%20PM.png

      J=

    33. Re:Retina Display is good and all, but... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      DPI scaling in Windows is basically up to the app to get right. If it tells it cannot support it (the default), it gets bitmap-scaled. If it tells that it supports it but doesn't actually do that, it gets messed up.

      However, at the very least, all stock Windows dialogs, and all MS apps I've seen so far (Office, VS...), support high DPI. So do most third party apps that declare that they do - all browsers, for example.

  12. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has been selling the Airport Express for years now, exactly for situations such as these.

    It's a complete 802.11n base station that's about the same size as an Apple laptop power brick.

  13. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by imemyself · · Score: 2

    Realistically though, I have a feeling that a Thunderbolt NIC dongle costs quite a bit more than it would cost to put the NIC on the motherboard.

    --
    Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
  14. No Classic or Rosetta by pubwvj · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apple has abandoned Classic and Rosetta so now there is a tremendous amount of software, and the data accessed by said software, that can't run on the new machines. This means I can't upgrade all our machines as we still need access to our old data. Their hardware is plenty fast enough to perform the emulation. The only excuse for Apple's dropping Classic and Rosetta is greed. But the result is lost sales of Apple.

    1. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seriously think "the only reason" for dropping Rosetta (PPC emulation layer for those who don't know) and Classic (Mac OS 9 compatibility layer) is greed?

      How about you maintain your own legacy compatibility layers then? Unless maybe doing so is actually something that requires a lot of extra effort for very very little good reason since by now the vast majority of users have moved away from both PPC and OS 9.

      Seriously, Rosetta I can almost understand that a handful of people still haven't gotten completely free from but Classic? That means you have been running (most likely) unsupported software on a deprecated platform for 10+ years without figuring out how to move away from the software and platform at hand to something slightly more modern...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 1

      It's probably because of the high-resolution screen - you need to use the new API because it's the only one that forces you to make your GUI resolution-indpendent. (that said, IANAAD - I am not an Apple developer)

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    3. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they don't want to get bogged down in a mire of legacy cruft like Microsoft, and you apparently, are?

    4. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Conception · · Score: 2

      "Their hardware is plenty fast enough to perform the emulation." Buy Parallels/Install VMWare Hypervisor and emulate it yourself. You don't need 10.8 to run decade old software.

    5. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple has abandoned Classic and Rosetta so now there is a tremendous amount of software, and the data accessed by said software, that can't run on the new machines. This means I can't upgrade all our machines as we still need access to our old data. Their hardware is plenty fast enough to perform the emulation. The only excuse for Apple's dropping Classic and Rosetta is greed. But the result is lost sales of Apple.

      If you can't get your data out of your old apps, it's not Apple's problem. Call those developers up and demand a patch immediately. After all, the only excuse is greed, right? You should be worshiping Apple - you've apparently got mission-critical Apple machines that nearly 15 years old. Talk about value for the money!

    6. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by franciscohs · · Score: 1

      But this happened with Lion, almost a year ago.

    7. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has abandoned Classic and Rosetta so now there is a tremendous amount of software, and the data accessed by said software, that can't run on the new machines.

      How many people want to run classic mac OS software on a new machine? Building, validating, and supporting such an emulator is a huge effort, and I suspect there are very few people who would actually use this.

      The only excuse for Apple's dropping Classic and Rosetta is greed. But the result is lost sales of Apple.

      How is it greedy to sell less hardware? Isn't it more likely that they decided the cost of maintaining compatibility shims for systems that were deprecated a decade ago is not worth the benefit? If you insist on running long-obsolete software, why can't you use older hardware?

    8. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is very well understood that Apple consistently drops support for legacy software, protocols, hardware, and everything in between after the technology no longer serves a majority of their users. How this is somehow news to you is what astounds me. You don't mention who "we" is, but if you are in any kind of decision-making position in your organization, you should have been preparing for this the very moment that Jobs walked on stage and gave a great big bear hug to Intel processors.

      Which was, by the way, something like a decade ago.

      You also don't mention what this "tremendous amount of software" of yours is, or what kind of "old data" you access, but my guess is that if you could afford to purchase the software in the 90's, and if it's really all that important to you, somebody can build you a solution to drag it kicking and screaming into the 21st century at a similar cost.

    9. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Apple has abandoned Classic and Rosetta so now there is a tremendous amount of software, and the data accessed by said software, that can't run on the new machines.

      Yeah!
      Like... uhh... like MacPaint!!!
      Yeah... and... uhhh... MacDraw!!!

    10. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by JDG1980 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Apple has abandoned Classic and Rosetta so now there is a tremendous amount of software, and the data accessed by said software, that can't run on the new machines.

      If you cared about legacy support you should have gone with Microsoft instead.

    11. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple dropped Classic 3-4 years ago? And Rosetta 2+ years ago? And everyone knew that this day was coming since OSX first shipped over 10 years ago?

      If you're just now worrying about legacy transition plans, I suggest you prepare your resume because you're about to get fired. You should have been doing this work incrementally. Now you're screwed because you won't be able to legally acquire the intermediary software and hardware.

      And I speak from experience, I forced the issue and managed a project to finally get a $250,000 transition plan through a year ago for a primarily Mac office. It only cost so much because the previous admin thought the way you do and let us get into such a state of arrears. If it had been done incrementally over time, it would have been a lot less expensive, AND we would had all the productivity gains over the past 5 years that new hardware and software would have given. That lost opportunity is an enormous cost if you actually sit down to calculate it.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    12. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I have one server app that I have to run on a PPC still (it never worked on Rosetta). There is a new version, however upgrading to an intel binary would cost $10k and add no new features or speed.

      So I keep an old G4 running OSX 10.4 running in a closet. When it dies, I have 3 other (no longer used) computers to scavenge for parts or replace in whole.

      I'm not losing any sweat over the transition. The only really painful thing was having to buy all new Adobe CS licenses for Intel when we were happy with the old versions.

    13. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Americano · · Score: 2

      Problem is, he did his resume in MacPaint. He can't even update that resume because it's locked into a proprietary format by Apple's greed!

    14. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only excuse for Apple's dropping Classic and Rosetta is greed. But the result is lost sales of Apple.

      And for someone with no sensible plan for moving on from dated technologies that were always known to be transitory, I'm sure the lost sales would be quite substantial. A Mac Mini for running that shared copy of Adobe CS 1? You've really got to look at what you're doing there. PPC code is less extreme but Classic? Seriously, that's insane. What are you running there?

    15. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      after the technology no longer serves a majority of their users.

      Like an ethernet port?

      It seems more likely that Apple drops things that they think shouldn't serve a majority of their users? Is that good or bad? I don't know. But it seems Apple wants to decide what SHOULD be there, not what is there and the majority of their users use.

      Seriously, you think all that non-replaceable-battery thing was because they decided that replacing batteries no longer served the majority of their users?

    16. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, Rosetta I can almost understand that a handful of people still haven't gotten completely free from but Classic? That means you have been running (most likely) unsupported software on a deprecated platform for 10+ years without figuring out how to move away from the software and platform at hand to something slightly more modern...

      What, and isn't IE6, DirectX 9 and Windows XP exactly the same as this statement? We're only starting to see sites that ignore the breakability under XP.

    17. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it's like the parent was saying, "Hey Apple, fall into that tar-pit of backwards compatibility support that is largely responsibility for all the bloat and security problems in Windows! I need to play Maniac Mansion, and I need to install it from the original floppy disk! Any OS that doesn't run applications written in the 90s must be a half-assed one. Greedy bastards!"

    18. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Actually, no new API is needed. All you need to do is provide an additional set of images. Where before you provided MyImage.png, now you must also provide MyImage@2x.png with twice the resolution. The API presents positions and resolutions in points, not pixels (meaning on the old MacBook Pros 1 pt == 1px, but on the new ones 1pt == 2px). Text will automatically render more smoothly in all apps, as again, they're specifying the text sizes in points, not pixels.

    19. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by slimjim8094 · · Score: 3, Informative

      after the technology no longer serves a majority of their users.

      Like an ethernet port?

      Actually, probably yes. I make more use of Ethernet than most people I know, and I still only use it once or twice a month.

      Seriously, you think all that non-replaceable-battery thing was because they decided that replacing batteries no longer served the majority of their users?

      No, the "non-replaceable battery thing" was because they could nearly double the battery life of the computer without sacrificing power. Considering that I just replaced the (removable) battery in my 2008 MBP, not because it was running low but because it was defective and bulging (they gave me a new one free), I don't think most people run the life out of their batteries. Even if you lost half the capacity, you'd still be better off than a new removable battery.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    20. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheepshaver

    21. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      This means I can't upgrade all our machines as we still need access to our old data. [...] But the result is lost sales of Apple.

      So how is buying another brand PC going to allow you to access all your old legacy Mac apps and data? Classic and Rosetta are both long dead, and everyone knew they were transition technologies. Really, you should have thought of it earlier.

    22. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      Try Virtualworks with an old Snow Leopard system disk.
      There are plenty of sites describing how to install it step by step. I have it running on Lion inside a Macbook Air.

      Just consider you won't get transferred clipboards, you'll need to exchange file through shared folders (between host and guest).

      But definitely on my Air all the old Appleworks files still are openable through Virtualworks.

      I heard the two paying alternatives (Parallels and Fusion) could do it as well (and perhaps with better integration) but will block installation because Apple doesn't want it...

      --
      Herve S.
    23. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Necroloth · · Score: 1
      I work at an engineering company with 3000+ engineers at this site alone.... most of us have transitioned to using laptops (lots still maintain their desktops - CAE etc) but pretty much everyone with a laptop docks into a station... and if they go to a meeting room, most people look for a cable rather than go on wireless because files are much quicker to access etc

      you not using ethernet much is nowehere near a broad description of general use...

    24. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I recently (in the past couple weeks) replaced the battery for my 2005 Macbook. Old one wouldn't hold a charge anymore. ~6.5 years on a single battery is pretty good in my book.

    25. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you're using docking stations, then Thunderbolt is more useful than an Ethernet port. The Ethernet hardware will be in the display, so you just have a single cable to plug in to get keyboard, mouse, ethernet, and video (and, optionally, some extra storage from some external hard disks).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The only excuse for Apple's dropping Classic and Rosetta is greed.

      Rosetta was licensed by Apple from Transitive Technologies, a company that was subsequently bought by IBM, a company that had no interest in licensing anything to Apple, especially after Steve Jobs' (very public) comments about IBM's failures with PowerPC. This meant that Apple was unable to license Rosetta for a newer version of OS X. 'PowerPC ancient technology and you should have upgraded by now' sounds a lot better than 'We built a large part of our migration strategy around a piece of third-party software that we can no longer license' from a marketing standpoint.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    27. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by bjb · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I was under the impression that Rosetta emulated a G4. If you used the G5 specific functions I think you might have been out of luck, but I've never tried it.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    28. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      because they could nearly double the battery life of the computer without sacrificing power.

      ... this is clearly not my field of knowledge :) but how could making it non-removable double the battery life? were the pre-removable-batteries really THAT bad? And in phones or iPods or wherever else, too?

      Actually, probably yes. I make more use of Ethernet than most people I know, and I still only use it once or twice a month.

      Yet it's been indispensable the relatively few times I have to use it ... i.e., when either the wireless simply isn't working or there's encryption issues or it's simply not available. Do I use it all the time? Definitely not. But I'm glad I do'nt have to carry a totally separate [$29] dongle for it. :) I would continue to maintain that Apple does change things as a trade-off for what they value or want to do rather than, necessarily, what most of their customers are currently doing. Sometimes, that's good. Sometimes, I think, it's not.

    29. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      ... this is clearly not my field of knowledge :) but how could making it non-removable double the battery life? were the pre-removable-batteries really THAT bad? And in phones or iPods or wherever else, too?

      The amount of, for lack of a better word, infrastructure required to make a battery removable takes up a huge amount of room. Look at the iPhone battery, the iPad battery (the hole is where the 3G modem goes, there's no wasted space), and the new retina MacBook Pro.

      Making the battery removable would've made the case thicker and the battery smaller. Furthermore, specifically in the MBP, they can make the battery non-rectangular (which is essentially impossible if it's removable) and take better advantage of the nooks and crannies of free space available. That's where I got my doubling figure from; I get 3.5-4hr on my replaceable-battery MBP if I'm not feeling frisky. But under the same sorts of workloads a newer model non-removable battery MBP gets a no-exaggeration 7 hours. It's clearly a drawback for people who need 12 hours of battery and were previously able to stock 3 batteries, but very few people actually need that kind of battery life (though a lot of people around here felt like they might).

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    30. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I THINK the reason the software doesn't work is that it uses a hardware dongle for license verification, and I think the dongle kernel extension doesn't work for Intel. Not sure.

    31. Re:No Classic or Rosetta by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I can see how you would get extra capacity, sure. Multiple hours more, not sure about that part.

      And, I guess here's perhaps the clincher for me; what about the special screws/screw drivers necessary? That can't be because it improves battery life. It seems like the only explanation is that Apple does not want you to change things yourself. They can justify it by saying they're trying to prevent ignorant people from breaking it or something like that, I suppose... but when you charge for the battery replacement, it's difficult for me, as a consumer, to agree with that argument. :)

  15. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by mikael_j · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your argument is flawed. The argument was that the added value of a thinner computer outweighs the value of the ethernet port and the cost of the adapter for a lot of users. Just because it doesn't fit your use-case perfectly doesn't mean it's useless.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  16. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not dongles, adapters. Thunderbolt literally extends PCIExpress to outside the chassis. Inside the dongle will be the same chip that they would have put on the motherboard (Or very similar) - And that motherboard is crowded! Did you see the pictures? Anything that wasn't black chip surface was black battery casing. Why not take some of your least used ports and put them outside, with no performance penalty? If you don't want the thunderbolt one I imagine you could pick up a 3rd party USB adapter.. But I imagine the thunderbolt version will be faster and better supported.

    Hell, I'd like thunderbolt on my desktop system. Plugging in a firewire dongle beats the hell out of cracking open the chassis to plug in an addon card. (Does anyone else want a PCI express x1 breakout box that plugs in to a thunderbolt port? That sounds awesome.)

    Firewire doesn't suprise me, but ethernet is usually a given standard. Though I imagine Ethernet is mostly a fallback for notebooks nowadays. Plugging your battery powered device in to something anchored to a switch, or a wall socket, doesn't seem particularly helpful.

  17. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple Defence Force, ASEEEMBLEEEE!!!!!

  18. Shut up and take my money! by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean, it's a bit expensive ($2199 in stock configuration), but how can you look at these five lines:

    2880x1800 resolution screen (this is insane)
    256 GB solid-state hard drive
    2.3 GHz quad-core Intel i7
    8 GiB memory
    7-hour battery life

    and not want one?

    --

    Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    1. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs/

      Memory: Configurable to 16GB.

      Storage: Configurable to 768GB flash storage.

    2. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could build 3 high performance desktops for that much.
      Or 2 gaming windows laptops.
      Or even a god damn server.

      And you're stupid enough to blow it on a mediocre laptop with a crummy OS? You have fun with that.

    3. Re:Shut up and take my money! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      cause of the first line

      Apple

      Been burned by that one before.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, I'm not some slavering fanboy like yourself who wants to spend money like that. I can assemble a PC with these components at a fraction of that cost.

      "But where's the SMUG? You can't have a computer without the SMUG!"

    5. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, it's a bit expensive ($2199 in stock configuration), but how can you look at these five lines:

      2880x1800 resolution screen (this is insane)
      256 GB solid-state hard drive
      2.3 GHz quad-core Intel i7
      8 GiB memory
      7-hour battery life

      and not want one?

      Um because as a gamer maybe i would want a 17 inch laptop for more real estate? Sorry but this is a failblog.org fail!

    6. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What am I going to use a server for?
      How will I use those desktops when I'm not at home?
      Will those gaming laptops have 7 hour battery lives and weight less than 4.4 lbs?

    7. Re:Shut up and take my money! by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Geforce 650M is pretty beefy.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Algae_94 · · Score: 0

      I agree that those specs are really good, but for $2200, that is what I expect to get if not more. I believe the thin-ness and weight (and the Apple logo) inflate the price a bit. I'd rather spend less and have a thicker, heavier version. Although, I'm a cheap ass that hasn't spent close to $2k for a computer since the mid 90's.

    9. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Fallingcow · · Score: 2

      I could build 3 high performance desktops for that much.

      Or a bit more than one, with displays pushing at least as many pixels and SSDs that large.

    10. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell does. It cost a quarter of the price as well.

    11. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have a Quadro 4000M for that sort of money.and a Xeon.

    12. Re:Shut up and take my money! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Cheaper, if your time is worthless.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Shut up and take my money! by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up and read the configurations you can get when you buy.

    14. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BWAHAHAHAHAHA oh god you kill me!

    15. Re:Shut up and take my money! by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To all the naysayers, duh, Mac's have always been more expensive "then the rest", but then they are not marketed to people like you so get over it.

      This is impressive, a lot of tech in a very small package and you can't even find that tech in ANY of the competition yet. While I know there is significantly better values out there if you just want a new computer, when you start building a Dell or HP laptop with any where close to the same tech in something no where near as well engineered as the new Macbook, you are paying close to $2000 anyways.

      Someone said they can build 3 desktops for that money, then what? Have 3 unused boxes of crap lying around?

      Same as always, Macs are never going to be the average joe's computer, I find it difficult to imagine the average joe requiring 2880 x 1800 displays anyways. This is squarely marketed to video editors, graphic designers, developers where the added screen real-estate will be welcomed. The fact that this thing isn't $3000+ because of the Retina display (which is not a commonly stocked component ANYWHERE), it is surprising they are selling it for so cheap.

      So, don't worry you can't afford or don't want to buy this new MacBook Pro. Your comments are useless. This product is not marketed towards you and if you don't get it, then no worries. Wait for Dell's cloned version of this and while it might be cheaper, it won't be the same, but you will feel happy for 1-up'ing a Mac fanboy.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    16. Re:Shut up and take my money! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So, let me know when you get a 15" laptop screen at 2880x1800 pixels, 220 ppi.

      Or a laptop that actually lasts 7 hours driving that resolution.

      Sometime next year. Maybe.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    17. Re:Shut up and take my money! by cbope · · Score: 1

      I'm the last one to defend Apple, but please do tell me where you are going to buy a display with 2880x1800 pixels at any size and still meet the rest of the specs under the same budget?

    18. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, what are you doing that *needs* more than 8 GB of RAM? I'm sure that if you're running several memory intensive applications, you can chew all of it up, but it's not going to be a significant performance bottleneck for most applications. Hell, you could probably run a lot of professional apps just fine and throw in a Windows/Linux VM and still be fine.

    19. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it come with a 2880x1800 display?

    20. Re:Shut up and take my money! by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      I agree: sometimes, you get what you pay for.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    21. Re:Shut up and take my money! by toriver · · Score: 1

      "Sheeple": The tired retort of the argumentless Apple-hater.

    22. Re:Shut up and take my money! by toriver · · Score: 1

      How is it mediocre? And how is the OS crummy? Because it has a proper command line shell instead of the dynamic duo of cmd.exe and PowerShell? Do you get a hard-on from making asinine posts like that?

    23. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when it comes to apple, you get far less than what you pay for.

    24. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus have fun using those desktops on an airplane.

    25. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Sancho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it difficult to imagine the average joe requiring 2880 x 1800 displays anyways

      That's not the point of this display. It's to provide extremely high-quality images and text at roughly the same size (in e.g. inches) as on the 1440x900 display.

      Go to Best Buy and look at the difference between the iPad2 and the iPad3 (or New iPad or whatever.) Go to a webpage and look at the text. If you see a difference, that's what they're talking about. If you don't see a difference, then the "Retina" display probably isn't for you.

    26. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but how can you look at these five lines: ... and not want one?

      Easy. What I have now already meets my needs, and I'm not trying to use new shiny gadgets to fill voids in my life.

    27. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling someone a hater means you have no rational rebuttal of your own, thus surrendering the argument.

      Not sure why you'd waste time responding to such a pointless comment in the first place though. Maybe the fanboi in you just can't let you ignore it.

    28. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sheeple": The tired retort of the argumentless Apple-hater-hater. Or really the tired retort of the argumentless *-hater.

    29. Re:Shut up and take my money! by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      The Quadro 4000m is the same card with a slight firmware tweak to make it perform worse at games, but better at GPGPU. Xeons are not laptop CPUs, they're physically too large to fit in here, and consume too much power (and hence obviously put out too much heat). They're also actually the exact same CPU die as the i7 in this laptop (at least the E3-12xx v2 ones), just differently binned, and with ECC support turned on.

      So basically... no.

    30. Re:Shut up and take my money! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I could build 3 high performance desktops for that much.

      Or a bit more than one, with displays pushing at least as many pixels and SSDs that large.

      Link please. I have yet to see a desktop display with a resolution like that.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    31. Re:Shut up and take my money! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      I could build 3 high performance desktops for that much.
        Or 2 gaming windows laptops.
        Or even a god damn server.

      Wow, your backpack must be huge.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    32. Re:Shut up and take my money! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How is it mediocre? And how is the OS crummy?

      OSX is crummy because a guy with a better haircut than me was in Starbucks writing a screenplay!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    33. Re:Shut up and take my money! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Calling someone a hater means you have no rational rebuttal of your own, thus surrendering the argument.

      Not sure why you'd waste time responding to such a pointless comment in the first place though. Maybe the fanboi in you just can't let you ignore it.

      Calling someone a fanboi means you have no rationale rebuttal of your own....

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    34. Re:Shut up and take my money! by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Uhh, since when is the 1920x1080 you'll get on your 17" laptop more real estate than 2880x1800?

    35. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Little_Professor · · Score: 1

      The display is amazing, yes. But all the other specs you quote are pretty ordinary. My 2011 laptop has double the capacity SSD, a faster processor, 16GB memory for around 2/3 of the price, albeit at the expense of some battery life.

    36. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loui Vuitton bags are not marketed to "people like you". Ferrari car's are not marketed to "people like you". Tiffany's diamond rings are not marketed to "people like you".
      Overpriced fashion items (bags, cars, jeweleries, electronics, etc) are never marketed to the average joes. What's your point? Is it that only intended consumers should have their comments valued? Everyone else opinions are useless, even on the tech-site like slashdot?

    37. Re:Shut up and take my money! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Since the UI element sizes on the new Pro will remain the same as they were on the old one, which was 15" 1440x900. They'll be more sharp and detailed, but it will still show the exact same amount of text and other stuff that it did before. Which is less than what a 17" 1920x1080 screen shows.

    38. Re:Shut up and take my money! by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      He's talking about playing games though –games will render quite happily at 2880x1800.

    39. Re:Shut up and take my money! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In games, pixel resolution actually doesn't matter much for real estate in most games, since they will scale UI and everything else - so higher-res will give you better visuals, and that's that. So from that perspective, a 17" screen is preferable.

      On the other hand, as a gamer, I would much prefer ultra-high-res 15" with superior eye candy to traditional 17". For immersive gaming, there are desktops with 27" monitors.

    40. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't afford a Mac just go buy a Dell or whatever, No need to rage out with envy. Life isn't fair, not everyone is going to be successful enough to use Apple gear. Get over it and move on.

    41. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would appear from the configuration page that the 768GB storage is built into main logic board. So to get the 768GB version, you need to start with the $2799 version. Memory can be bumped up on its own.

      Somewhat annoying for those that don't need the extra CPU but want the larger HD.

    42. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      The closest I can find are 27" 2560 x 1440 screens, which start around $700. There are some 30"ers that push the second number up to 1600, but they start around $400 higher than the 27"ers and gain any pixel density.

      In any case, that's the sort of thing I was thinking of, but it's not a great comparison since those screens are larger but have much lower pixel density. I'd wager the 27"ers would come close to the 15" retina display in price--if you could actually find one for sale that's not attached to an Apple laptop--but that's really just a guess.

      I'm hoping Apple's recent pixel bumps drive other companies to do the same; economies of scale will kick in, and a PC monitor that matches or beats my 22" HP CRT may finally drop to a reasonable price.

    43. Re:Shut up and take my money! by arekin · · Score: 1

      To all the naysayers, duh, Mac's have always been more expensive "then the rest", but then they are not marketed to people like you so get over it.

      This is impressive, a lot of tech in a very small package and you can't even find that tech in ANY of the competition yet. While I know there is significantly better values out there if you just want a new computer, when you start building a Dell or HP laptop with any where close to the same tech in something no where near as well engineered as the new Macbook, you are paying close to $2000 anyways.

      Someone said they can build 3 desktops for that money, then what? Have 3 unused boxes of crap lying around?

      Same as always, Macs are never going to be the average joe's computer, I find it difficult to imagine the average joe requiring 2880 x 1800 displays anyways. This is squarely marketed to video editors, graphic designers, developers where the added screen real-estate will be welcomed. The fact that this thing isn't $3000+ because of the Retina display (which is not a commonly stocked component ANYWHERE), it is surprising they are selling it for so cheap.

      So, don't worry you can't afford or don't want to buy this new MacBook Pro. Your comments are useless. This product is not marketed towards you and if you don't get it, then no worries. Wait for Dell's cloned version of this and while it might be cheaper, it won't be the same, but you will feel happy for 1-up'ing a Mac fanboy.

      Except for the retina display, samsungs series7 laptop beats this in every way at 1000 dollars cheaper. And for portability, I'll take .about .2 inches of extra width and 1/2 pound of weight for an extra usb port, a built in optical drive, and a gb ethernet port. Oh and I got my laptop 6 months ago, so yes, you are paying 1000 dollars for a retina display that's largely unnecessary (your display size is not any larger, so your just shrinking the information on your screen to get more on it.) and an apple logo that makes you feel special for being a trend whore.

      --
      Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll.
    44. Re:Shut up and take my money! by arekin · · Score: 1

      I find it difficult to imagine the average joe requiring 2880 x 1800 displays anyways

      That's not the point of this display. It's to provide extremely high-quality images and text at roughly the same size (in e.g. inches) as on the 1440x900 display.

      Go to Best Buy and look at the difference between the iPad2 and the iPad3 (or New iPad or whatever.) Go to a webpage and look at the text. If you see a difference, that's what they're talking about. If you don't see a difference, then the "Retina" display probably isn't for you.

      Look at the pictures on that web page, see any difference, if you do your kidding yourself because they are at 72 dpi, the images will be not better quality with a retina display that with any other display. Retina display will only make a difference with photo editing and some graphics work, and then not substantually because you are still dealing with a 15 in display, so things can just get smaller. Mac pro with a cinema display is really about the only place you are going to see the benefits of a display that large.

      --
      Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll.
    45. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tech is already available in a smaller, lighter package with greater specs for almost half the shelf price currently, sans the pretty useless display. Look up a Clevo W110ER.

    46. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't afford a Mac just go buy a Dell or whatever, No need to rage out with envy. Life isn't fair, not everyone is going to be successful enough to use Apple gear. Get over it and move on.

      Oh for fuck sake I can't understand how people actually believe Apple products are somehow only for successful or rich people. iPhones are the most common smartphone in the world, iPods are the most common mp3 player in the world, iPads are the most common tablet computer in the world, Macs are hardly more expensive than similarly configured laptops once you factor in the software value-adds. These days the only people who don't have Apple products the the people who don't want Apple products.

      You continue to sit there and think you're special and privileged and that people envy you for having Apple products if that's what you need to have any kind of self-worth. I've got an Air, Pro, Mini and an iPhone (no ipad anymore) and if there is something else that works just as well they will be dumped, i don't give 2 shits that they are Apple...i like OSX for general usage which is why i have Apple computers and i have pretty standard smartphone requirements so since the iphone is defacto standard these days that was the obvious choice.

    47. Re:Shut up and take my money! by exomondo · · Score: 1

      your display size is not any larger, so your just shrinking the information on your screen to get more on it.

      Actually it's not even doing that, it is doing pixel-doubling in all applications that don't support the 'retina display' so there is no advantage in those cases at all, the actual elements displayed on screen are the same size, they are just sharper if they support the new display.

    48. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple doesn't really market to video editors, graphic designers, etc anymore. The 17" MacBook Pro was bought pretty much exclusively by the three groups you mentioned (I happen to be a developer and I love my 17" MBP) and now they've axed it. The mac-based pro services retailer and consultant business I work at has also heard rumors that this will probably be the last Mac Pro refresh. Anyway the Retina display does NOT provide more screen real-estate. The sole purpose of it is to increase the visual quality of text and graphics rendered onscreen by quadrupling the DPI.

      Apple has always been about selling the average joe's computer, right back to the Apple II and the Macintosh. They haven't always done this successfully, notably when Jobs was ousted and Scully nearly drove Apple into the ground by effectively commoditizing Macs. Now they're back on track, what with the success of iPod, iPhone, and iPad. Apple has also refined their portable offerings and made them even more attractive to American middle class students. I personally know six or seven college students that bought a MacBook Pro (most of them 13") from their school because they're hip and they got an education discount.

      If anyone's comment is useless, it's your own. I doubt any of us here have any real knowledge on the cost breakdown of the new Pros. (I can, however, tell you that 3rd party Apple retailers have a very very small profit margin on actual Mac hardware. We're forced to make our money on peripherals and upgrades.) So anyone's comments on the pricing of these models are opinions. I happen to agree with GP's opinion on the starting price. You, on the other hand, have no factual basis on which to say that they should probably be $3000+.

      As far as building 3 desktops for that money... Personally I've always looked at comparing DIY build prices for PC to notebooks in general to be apples and oranges. Notebook components are more expensive as a rule. Moreover, high-end desktops are significantly cheaper to build than to buy as-is simply because of the way the market works. I happen to have built a fairly well-spec'd Hackintosh for my at-home desktop computing. Not that I don't consider say an iMac to be worth it's price, I just felt I didn't have a need for the design features that make them comparatively expensive (all-in-one form factor, aluminum casing, large screen, etc). On the other hand, I'm quite happy with my decision to buy a 17" MacBook Pro a few years ago. I've gotten a great deal of heavy use out of it and it goes without saying that it's been much more reliable than my Hackintosh.

    49. Re:Shut up and take my money! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Go to Best Buy and look at the difference between the iPad2 and the iPad3

      That's true, however, I think you shouldn't always do that. Because you only see the difference if you compare them.

      If you don't, you'll be quite satisfied.

      Currently my TV is an old 32" with a resolution of 900x400 or something. Of course, when I compare it to a HDTV or even HD-Ready TV, then it looks shit. But I don't.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    50. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'To all the naysayers, duh, Mac's have always been more expensive "then the rest", but then they are not marketed to people like you so get over it.'

      Hey TheSkepticalOptimist, you seem to be quite eloquent, but THEN, you made quite a basic junior school error. THEN I thought, maybe I'm bigger THAN this, should I post a reply? What the heck, this mac fan boy needs to know he's not so smart after all, my seven year old has no difficulty knowing how to spell THEN and THAN. As you said in your post "Your comments are useless", smug fucktard.

    51. Re:Shut up and take my money! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      You must not watch sports then.

      Once you watch sports on anyone's HD tv, all sports on SD resolution look like utter crap. Especially hockey.

      I have an HD and an SD tv in my house. It's enough to get me to move when watching sports.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    52. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pay $1000 just to not use Windows.

    53. Re:Shut up and take my money! by bongey · · Score: 1

      The price is around or less than other mobile workstations.
      I would consider one the only problem is most mobile workstations(dell,levono) on a dock can drive 4 external monitors.
      The nvidia optimus and amd eyefinity both support driving 5 displays at 1920x1080 ( 9600x5400 total viewing area).
      The nvidia chip inside the new make will have no problems driving the 2880x1800 resolution because the tech has been out for while
      I am currently working on my company assigned dell and driving two external 1920x1080 monitors. I would pay for the more expensive laptops to have the ability to drive 5 total displays.

    54. Re:Shut up and take my money! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Hey, they also have the Korn shell (http://news.slashdot.org/story/01/02/06/2030205/david-korn-tells-all), even though it might not be the standard compliant korn shell...

    55. Re:Shut up and take my money! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      In AC World of course, where all the spare parts magically work together, and prices cheaper than you can buy anywhere else, and is of first rate quality, and never fails.

      Also less fattening.

    56. Re:Shut up and take my money! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      As someone with 20/10 and 20/15 eyes (at 41 years old, mind you! Yay for superior genes!), these are not the "retina" displays I'm looking for.

      Apparently, for my eyes, "retina" display will be about 400 - 500 PPI.

      But I'll still take this laptop, thanks! :)

    57. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And half the battery life. Great laptop, for 3.5 hours.

    58. Re:Shut up and take my money! by rhook · · Score: 1

      1. Cut the resolution in half and that is what you're really getting (just with a higher pixel density).
      2. At that price it should be a 512GB SSD.
      3. Could be faster.
      4. Should be double. 16GB kits can be had for around $100 these days.
      5. My 2 year old Thinkpad gets that.

    59. Re:Shut up and take my money! by rhook · · Score: 1

      There is no added screen real-estate. The OS will double the size of everything effectively giving you a 1440x900 resolution with a high pixel density. Compare the iPad2 and iPad3 side by side and you'll see what I mean. One has a higher resolution but everything is the same size on both of them.

    60. Re:Shut up and take my money! by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I agree: sometimes, you get what you pay for.

      Get less, pay more? Ding!

  19. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) laptop.

    Face it wifi is not all over the place and Ethernet is faster, has more security, work better in some places, ect.

    I was just in a hotel with in room cable modems hooked to the tv system with Ethernet and Poor wifi in room.

    I don't know too many frequent travelers that don't carry around an AirPort Express or other pocket-sized wi-fi device of their own for those hotels that either haven't or can't upgrade to pervasive wi-fi. Your hotel Ethernet is not going to be "faster, more secure, or work better" than if it was plugged into an AirPort Express anyway.

    For lab use, you probably wouldn't get the dongle but rather the whole docking station and connect the monitors, ethernet, keyboard, mouse, everything via that one port.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  20. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    Realistically though, I have a feeling that a Thunderbolt NIC dongle costs quite a bit more than it would cost to put the NIC on the motherboard.

    What's worse is you'll probably want to buy two of them, one for that connection that you're always plugged into (i.e. work or home) then the second one for when you're oot and aboot somewhere.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  21. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    Face it wifi is not all over the place and Ethernet is faster, has more security, work better in some places, ect.

    I'm gonna go with more reliable.

  22. Yes and no by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    So no in the strict sense, OS-X is still resolution dependent, it doesn't have true independent scaling like Windows 7 does. However yes in the sense of this device in that it uses the HiDPI pixel doubling trick of the iPad.

    So this screen is precisely double a 1440x900 screen, which is a pretty normal mid-rez 15" screen. What happens is if apps are flagged as HiDPI aware, they get presented with the real resolution and can render things with more detail. If not, they are presented with quarter resolution and all pixels are doubled in each direction.

    So it solves the problem in sort of a sidelong manner. It works since Apple maintains control over the hardware and thus can say "screens will be available in the following resolutions".

    1. Re:Yes and no by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      If it's like the Air, they are not soldered to the motherboard, they are on a small (proprietary) daughtercard. So it's not impossible to upgrade, just annoying and expensive. I guess that's the trade off for a 0.7" thick, 4.5lb laptop... no one buys Macbooks for their low price and ease of upgrade...

      Actually, the Air's SSD isn't proprietary. It's called mSATA and it's used on netbooks as well, though the Air is the primary reason these days by volume sales. It's not as easy to get, but it's part of the SATA standard.

      So no in the strict sense, OS-X is still resolution dependent, it doesn't have true independent scaling like Windows 7 does. However yes in the sense of this device in that it uses the HiDPI pixel doubling trick of the iPad.

      So this screen is precisely double a 1440x900 screen, which is a pretty normal mid-rez 15" screen. What happens is if apps are flagged as HiDPI aware, they get presented with the real resolution and can render things with more detail. If not, they are presented with quarter resolution and all pixels are doubled in each direction.

      I wonder though if it's possible for those of us with sharper eyesight to use all those pixels in super-teeny-tiny mode just to have the resolution - more windows on screen, more code on screen, etc...

    2. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really would not go around touting the virtues of window's "true independent scaling". In practice, it's just as bad as anything else.
      Originally it was supposed to be a big part of windows vista.. But was badly mangled when most windows vista machines shipped without gpu hardware fast enough to enable the GUI scaling it required.

      That, and it only works for new software... Sort of. Anything written with old libraries that uses legacy window rendering methods looks like crap and scales like crap. This includes a lot of current commercial software. And parts of windows itself. (Anyone still surprised when digging around various bits of windows config and have lots of 'Hey, I remember this control panel. It looked this way in windows 95!' moments?)

      Its sort of a chicken-and-egg problem. You really do need pixel densities like you see in these new 'retina' displays before you can implement arbitrary UI scaling and have it not look like blocky garbage. Subpixel rendering at conventional monitor pixel densities is an ugly blurry hack that only works if you have bad vision to begin with. (Not kidding. If you have cleartype turned on and it looks good, you need glasses. - Not trolling. Really. Trust me here. Go to the optometrist. You'll thank me.)

    3. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the (newer) Macbook Air SSD is proprietary. While the connector looks like a standard msata connector it is not and plugging in a generic msata SSD will not work.

    4. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Air's SSD isn't proprietary. It's called mSATA and it's used on netbooks as well, though the Air is the primary reason these days by volume sales. It's not as easy to get, but it's part of the SATA standard.

      Apple didn't use mSATA. Electrically, it's SATA, just not a standard connector:

      http://www.anandtech.com/show/5854/asus-zenbook-ssd-and-apples-macbook-air-ssd-are-not-compatible

      That's not the only difference from mSATA. Apple chose a very long and narrow PCB outline; mSATA drives are shorter (and I believe wider but I'm not sure offhand). As a result, Apple's SSD mounting hardware (standoff & screw) are not in the right location for mSATA drives.

    5. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subpixel rendering at conventional monitor pixel densities is an ugly blurry hack that only works if you have bad vision to begin with. (Not kidding. If you have cleartype turned on and it looks good, you need glasses. - Not trolling. Really. Trust me here. Go to the optometrist. You'll thank me.)

      You may not be trolling but you are wrong. Subpixel rendering done right looks better, good vision or not.

      I know this because ten years ago when it was relatively new and I still had measured 20:20 vision in my good eye, Apple's OS X subpixel rendering looked better than conventional rasterization. Even when holding the bad eye closed. Yes, it's possible for subpixel rasterizers to look a bit blurry and/or have visible color fringes if they're attempting to use LCD stripe triads for additional horizontal resolution. But well tuned ones don't.

      It should be noted that Apple's algorithms are different from Cleartype in significant ways. Apple's design uses subpixel rendering for the full line layout. Microsoft Cleartype does subpixel rendering of glyphs to generate bitmaps which are subsequently blitted to the screen. It's faster, but has visible kerning and word spacing errors.

    6. Re:Yes and no by fastasleep · · Score: 1

      Yes you can - see this.

    7. Re:Yes and no by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I wonder though if it's possible for...

      No! -Apple

    8. Re:Yes and no by rhook · · Score: 1

      mSATA cards are actually pretty easy to get these days. Many business laptops offer the option.

  23. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WiFi isn't everywhere. But it's at a hell of a lot more places than ethernet. Last time I used ethernet was 2009.

    Are you saying that Laptop should be held up thickness wise, at the point where the body can accomodate an RJ45?

    The minority of people that are still ufing ethernet for laptops need to carry an ethernet cable with them anyway. It's no hardship to them to take a cable with a dongle in instead. Meanwhile the majority who use WiFi now get a better laptop.

  24. Oooooooh Retina Display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll be able to see it with my retina

    or vagina

  25. i'm getting the fear by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is a LOT of features and behaviors. I don't feel prepared to understand and manage all of them. I feel like iOS is adding too damn much and is danger of becoming a Windows/Linux jumble of weird features in too many weird places. I want simple.

    Anyone else getting the fear?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:i'm getting the fear by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as the disconnected consumer computer anymore . These new computers will come with an entire ARRAY of communications to the mothership that would have drove us insane in the 80s and 90s. The amount of actual spying that goes on , on a machine you 'own', is truly astonishing.

      Sent from my mac ;)

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:i'm getting the fear by Symbha · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fear leads to anger...

    3. Re:i'm getting the fear by Sparton · · Score: 1

      A lot of the complexity is mitigated by compartmentalizing as much as possible into distinct apps. Then again, I'm not an iPhone user, so the phone-centric additions of call priorities and e-mail management are not as easy for me to compare.

      I do remember when I was first booting my iPad up after the last major iOS and the rediculous number of menus I needed to click through/decide things for. How long before getting a new device is like the lawyer singularity?

    4. Re:i'm getting the fear by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      I've been agonizing over this since Apple bought NeXT.

      While I prefer Mac OS X to the old Mac OS, there're a bunch of things which I've had to give up from NeXT/OPENstep:

        - repositionable, vertical main menu w/ tear off sub menus (need to access a command frequently? Tear it off and put it in a corner)
        - pop-up main menu (used some commands, like ``Punch'' in Altsys Virtuoso, so much they became essentially gestural)
        - Top-level Print, Hide, Quit and Services menus
        - pervasive Services which ``just work''
        - Display PostScript (it kills me that two decades after DPS was created it's still possible to put a graphic on-screen and not have it print to match the on-screen appearance)
        - system-wide PANTONE color library license
        - skull and crossbones ``Kill'' button
        - ``Unix Expert'' checkbox which would show all hidden system directories
        - re-sizable ``Shelf'' in the Miller-column browser --- the sidebar is nice, but it lacks the divider bar so that one can hide or show rows as desired
        - Altsys Virtuoso --- while FreeHand is nice, it lacks Display PostScript and 10.6.8 is the last OS X version it will be running in (requires Rosetta) --- if Adobe would just recompile it for Intel, I'd pay for an upgrade

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    5. Re:i'm getting the fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Steve Jobs RDF is the mind killer ?

  26. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    all this talk about dongles and inches...

  27. Is it truly expensive? by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who else on the market is doing that?

    Let alone in the same form factor

    and only 4.4 lbs?

    The display beats my 27 inch iMac which has 2560x1440!

    I am really curious how well that Nvidia chip can push 5 million plus pixels in a game because you know games will/have gone there.

    I was fully expecting a 2499 entry price, the 2199 is an amazing price for what they have packaged.

    Granted your going to be buying an external optical drive if you want for around a hundred, a three year warranty for at least 250 or 350 more... so it will quickly hit 3k

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Is it truly expensive? by rachit · · Score: 1

      With a retina display, at least they could probably turn off anti-aliasing

    2. Re:Is it truly expensive? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      "Granted your going to be buying an external optical drive if you want for around a hundred"

      Why? I was shooting some weddings and wanted to make lightscribed DVDs so I picked up an external drive - for $25. You can probably find the things on street corners now.

    3. Re:Is it truly expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From experience, non-AA graphics on a retina display can reveal individual pixels and display stairstepping. The retina display is just barely beyond the limit of human perception in the average case; we can still distinguish some types of finer details under ideal circumstances so AA still has a reason to exist.

    4. Re:Is it truly expensive? by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      According to the specs with both the onboard Intel HD chipset and the discrete graphics, the retina MBPs can drive both the main display @ 2880x1800 and two external displays at 2560x1600 at the same time. Since I suspect most Mac games are not HiDPI-aware, they'll still be rendering for 1440x900 and Mac OS X will scale it up to 2880x1800. What I'm curious about is how Windows will handle this.

    5. Re:Is it truly expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The display is the only thing here that is innovative. Some niche markets may need it, as publishers, graphic designers, and apple programmers. Who doesn't appreciate higher resolution on your screen? As a programmer, I do have my dual 28'' screens with more screen real state, which I won't be switching for a smaller screen.

      The hard drive is old news, my sony vaio z came with an SSD that size back in 2010.

      The processor is again just a bit old, my lenovo had a core i7 2 or 3 years ago, and although this processor is newer, I don't see any big improvement.

      8 GiB memory is pretty standard today for any laptop more expensive than 600$ I think.

      7 hour battery? that would be a step down for me, as my lenovo has 10hr battery.

      Overall, nicer screen, which puts you 2 grand behind. Also, is white, so hipsters and fan boys will go crazy about it.

  28. Easy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    By looking at the other lines of

    Geforce 650M

    and

    No Ethernet port.

    For me, I wish to have higher end graphics since gaming is what I want my laptop for in a major way (it is mostly a mobile entertainment station for me when I go on vacation). Also, to the extent I use it for work, an Ethernet port is something I quite need. I'd rather not have to add that on as a dongle.

    So I spent the same amount on a laptop, but got a bit different hardware, more to my liking.

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a high-end gaming computer.

      And are going with Apple.

      Honestly, not trolling here. Maybe I'm just out of the loop when it comes to PC gaming, but has it changed much in the past few years such that the gaming market is essentially non-existent on a Mac (or failing that, a second thought), and Windows is what you use if you... y'know... actually want to play most games?

    2. Re:Easy by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Are you saying Diablo 3 is not a good benchmark? It's been announced as Retina ready.

      http://i.joystiq.com/2012/06/11/diablo-3-updated-with-retina-display-support-for-next-generatio/

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Easy by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The lack of a ethernet port on the original MacBook air was bad because there was no suitable alternative - USB doesn't cut it. But Thunderbolt, on the other hand, has plenty of bandwidth to hang the ethernet interface (plus everything else) on it. I just hope there are more thunderbolt peripherals soon, because for now I still start each day by plugging in my ethernet, firewire external drive, displayport, usb hub, and headphones to my MacBook.

    4. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB doesn't cut it.

      Just how often does your laptop really need more than 480Mb/s?

    5. Re:Easy by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Then get the fullsized macbook pro if that really rocks your boat.

      if you don't like Macs, just say so, nobody's forcing you to like Macs. But to come out with silly justifications is just... silly.

    6. Re:Easy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's also pretty interesting that this comes with two Thunderbolt ports. Lack of GigE would be irritating for me (as would lack of FireWire 800), but I think two Thunderbolt ports more than makes up for it. Even driving a plain DisplayPort monitor with one, you've still got something that's effectively an external PCIe connector for everything else...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  29. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    I dont get the drooling over Retina Display. Unless you are a graphics professional, i just dont see the use-case for it.

    --
    Good-bye
  30. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thunderbolt? Did I miss something? Is a USB dongle which you can buy new for $30 not fast enough?

  31. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course Apple paired it with a mid to low end budget GPU from nvidia.

    ITS JOBSTASTIC AT ONLY $2k+

  32. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the store now. $29.

    That's hardly going to break the budget for a top of the line $2,199 laptop buyer.

  33. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Funny

    640x480 is enough for anyone.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  34. mac pro only got a small bump by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    they made the Optional 3.2 Quad-Core the base CPU and bumped the ram to 6gb. But why take 2 years to do that?

    But
    NO video card update (the ATI Radeon HD 5870 still costs $200 on top of base video card.) why not just make it the base video card??
    NO thunderbolt
    NO USB 3.0

    1. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by cbope · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure USB 3.0 was added to all the Macbooks...

    2. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by dusanv · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's talking about the red-headed step child of the Mac line: the Mac Pro. Mac Pro is still stuck in USB2 land. I think it's outrageous they're marketing it as "new". It's 3+ year old technology at $2500 base price for 4 cores.

    3. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      Because it's not baked into the motherboard controller logic.

      Although seriously Apple? The Mac Pro isn't meant to be a tiny machine. Just put a discrete USB3.0 controller on there.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then that takes away from other devices/controllers that you may need. Throw on a graphics card and a couple of fibre HBAs and you have no room for a USB 3.0 / Thunderbolt expansion card.

    5. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 2

      This. The talk I've been hearing at work (Apple retailer) says this is the last Mac Pro refresh. I'm told they don't sell well enough to justify the huge design and engineering costs needed for each major refresh. As someone who has serviced many different models of Mac Pro, this doesn't surprise me at all. Internally they are incredibly overengineered, with daughterboards and slide-out compartments for all the major components. They're even practically cable-less, with all the component connections and power rails routed through the motherboard!

      Furthermore, the continued lack of Thunderbolt doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Mac Pros already have PCIe slots to serve their high-speed bus needs. It's not like Apple to allow overlapping functionality in their products.

    6. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by teatimebing · · Score: 1

      NO socket for an infiniband card...oh wait.

    7. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      huge design and engineering costs needed for each major refresh.

      Is there really that much design and engineering required? They are using standard components so shifting to a more powerful processor or different chipset is hardly a huge leap. From a design point of view the exterior hasn't changed in any meaningful way since the G5 PowerMac was originally released in 2003 and the interior is pretty set now. The reason the original G5 PowerMacs were so over engineered is that the chips ran incredibly hot so cooling them, without making it sound like a jet engine, required elaborate heatsinks and airpaths through the case. Now they don't have that issue and the case design can stay the same until a new motherboard format requires them to change it.

    8. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by bjb · · Score: 1
      If they're using standard components, then why is the darn thing so expensive? Sure, the Xeon processors gouge your wallet, but the fact that you're supplying your own display should at least put the cost on par with the high spec iMacs.

      I have an early 2008 model and I think it is great, but after realizing that the only real upgrading I could do within a reasonable budget was RAM and hard disk (graphics card is price locked for Mac-usable ones), I think I'm fairly relegated to getting an iMac instead next time.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    9. Re:mac pro only got a small bump by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      This is what I'm saying, their innards aren't all that standard. Their motherboards are extremely exotic and a major update would require a radically different tracing layout. The internal case design has also changed twice (at least?) since the original G5 PowerMac layout. The current models are even more over engineered than the old G5s.

  35. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    By that argument, we'd all still be limited on laptop size by the volume of a 3.5" floppy drive. Even though few people use them any more.

  36. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, added cost, but consider that you're buying with that extra cost a thinner laptop (because it didn't have to be included) and the option of NOT carrying it around. I've found that I almost never need either the display adapter or the ethernet adapter, so I don't have to carry them around if I don't need them (I have an Air).

    The cost of an ethernet or display dongle and the cost of carrying around a built-in versions, pales in comparison to the cost of not having the port or dongle when you need it. We had a convention recently and one of the presenters forgot to bring his display dongle for his Mac. We spent a few minutes scrounging around for one while someone worked on copying his presentation over to a PC. 3 minutes * 150 guests = a cumulative 7.5 hours of wasted time. (And for you Mac fans who don't like how I'm counting time, it's how Steve Jobs thought of saving time.)

    For me, the thinness is worth it.

    That's the problem. People are starting to think of laptops as fashion statements foremost, rather than as tools. It's fine to want good aesthetics (a good-looking laptop is nicer than a bad-looking one), but one should never give up functionality for the sole purpose of aesthetics. If you're never going to present or plug in, then there's no problem. Any costs associated with forgotten dongles or lack of ports are yours to bear alone. But if you do stuff which might ever externalize that cost, you need to factor that into your decision of functionality vs. aesthetics. (For our part, we're going to have to buy a Mac video dongle for the projector to make sure this doesn't happen again. We're paying for the Mac users' aesthetic tastes. But at least it's damn cheaper than making 150 people wait.)

  37. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You probably need to see a retina display alongside a standard one to appreciate it.

    It certainly makes more sense than HDTV does.

  38. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you're not very bright.

    Higher pixel density displays afford cleaner, smoother fonts and images (assuming the apps and media used with it utilise the extra pixels). You might have to be a 'graphics professional' to fully utilise a retina display, but you don't have to be one to appreciate it.

  39. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dynedain · · Score: 2

    The physical parts may cost less to put the NIC on the motherboard, but in something as space-tight as the MacBook Pro, the space savings probably outweigh it.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  40. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if it does, in a few months you'll be able to get the same adapter for $2.99 at Monoprice.

  41. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

    Yes, I hate carrying around my integrated gbit NIC on my HP Probook. The thing is so awkward to pry out of the case every time I want to remove it.

    Are you seriously arguing that its more convenient to have to carry this around as a dongle? What is this, 1999? Ethernet is ubiquitous! Whats next in the name of "slimming", lightpeak-based dongles to add USB functionality again? Why not remove ALL other ports and have everything chain off of a single firewire interface?

  42. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Except now you have more crap to lug around, which defeats the purpose of a thinner laptop. If this were some rarely used feature (COUGH FIREWIRE), then yea, dongle-ize it. Ethernet though? Youve got to be kidding.

  43. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Except that ethernet isnt rarely used. I get the impression that every one of my friends with a laptop has used ethernet at sometime or another (if not on a regular basis) because its more reliable than wifi, and it just works even if you know nothing about network config.

  44. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by fermion · · Score: 1

    I hate to add this, but every once in a while I would like to have fax modem. More importantly a fax modem that could hook up to my cell phone. I need this much more that I need an ethernet port.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  45. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    You're kind of a dick arent you. I already said i dont get it for my use case, but i could see the use case for it. To me its a nicety, but whatever. I gave up caring about monitor resolution when 1080p became de facto.

    --
    Good-bye
  46. I'm confused by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0

    Does this mean the iPhone 5 will run iOS6? And if we later have an "iPhone 5X" will the iPhone 6 be running iOS8? Apple needs to get its versions back in sync.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There won't be an iPhone 5; they'll call it "the new iPhone".

      Then all of the software will be numbered (iOS6, OS X 10.8, etc) and all of the hardware will referred to by build date (early 2007 iMac, 2011 Macbook Air, etc).

    2. Re:I'm confused by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this should confuse you. Did you think you had Computer 95 when Windows 95 came out? Did your computer lose features when you went to Windows 7?

      iOS versions are not the same as hardware versions. iOS version numbers would be very difficult to pin to the iPhone anyway, since iOS is now on the iPhone, iPod touch, Apple TV, and iPad. Apple TV is the most confusing, where iOS 5 actually gets listed as AppleTV software bundle 4.x

    3. Re:I'm confused by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

      So what happens when they issue a incremental upgrade to the "new iPhone"? Is it now the "new iPhone" and the previous one the "old iPhone?" Maybe they need to just to keep add the word "new" to the front for later versions. Then, you can count the number of times the word "new" appears in the product title to determine the version number.

    4. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never were in sync. No one really cares though, since the system version isn't part of advertising.

  47. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

    Ill take a $1400 cheaper laptop with a matte screen designed for actual work. Enjoy being gouged though.

  48. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Korin43 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thinner => Lighter / Smaller => More portable

    Seems like a reasonable thing to want in a laptop. If I wanted a machine that did everything at any cost.. I'd get a desktop.

  49. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll force all the PC companies to quit bundling shitty displays with their laptops because they're "HD". I'm working on a Dell right now that has a 1366x768 display. It's 15.4". Before the "HD" craze my 17" Dell came with a 1900x1200 display. Now the 17" displays are all 1080p. Hell you can get a cheap 24" display that's only 1080p. Why the hell would I want a 24" display if it's only 1080p?

    Just like as soon as Apple came out with the integrated webcam and back lit keyboards they magically started to appear on Dells and other PC laptops I bet within a few months Dell loudly starts rolling out their "SUPER MEGA PIXEL HD" Displays on their laptops.

  50. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Sancho · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a Macbook Air and I bought the USB-to-Ethernet dongle. I never used it. I can see it being essential for some people, but certainly not for everyone. Apple can't be everything to everyone.

  51. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

    Im sure they are wonderful like so many other things, but for a "you need to do a close comparison to see a difference", I think Macs tend to make a rather poor budgeting choice.

    Before you buy that mac with the shiney display, just be aware you are literally paying >2x (and over $1000 more) for OSX and a higher resolution monitor, as well as (generally) WORSE specs everywhere else. If its worth it to you, fine, but I would never be able to justify that expenditure myself when there are so many awesome sub-$500 laptops floating around.

  52. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Bertie · · Score: 2

    I've been dying for one for years. No screen has had enough pixel height since CRTs went the way of the dinosaur, Now with one of these I can finally get all the toolbars and panels I need on the screen at the same time and still have room for the thing I'm actually working on.

  53. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    To a lot of users wired networking is not a major feature, it's something that might be nice to have. These users will either not carry the dongle with them or they will keep it at the bottom of their bag (in which case the thinner form-factor and lower weight of the laptop can still be an advantage even when bringing the dongle along).

    Personally I'd probably leave it plugged in at my desk in my home office or at work (or maybe one at either location), if I was anywhere else I'd just use wifi (or if I suspected there might not be wifi I could just bring the dongle).

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  54. Just $200 for 16GB RAM by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Though Apple traditionally does charge you a lot for RAM, $200 for 8GB more seems somewhat reasonable... It's also faster RAM than previous models.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      $200 for 8GB more seems somewhat reasonable...

      Not to me.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233217

      1600 MHz can be had for about 30 bucks more, but it's actually not worth it for the higher CAS.

    2. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Given that you can get 2 8GB 1600MT/s SODIMMs for $120 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007635%20600006178%20600000410%20600213067&IsNodeId=1&name=16GB%20%282%20x%208G%29) it's really not very well priced at all. The upgrade should be in the region of $80 (as you're getting rid of the $40 pair of 4GB DIMMs).

    3. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $200 for 8GB more seems somewhat reasonable

      8gb of ram is $50. That's an even bigger ripoff than Apple's usual wallet rape.

    4. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by ravenspear · · Score: 2

      And thus, you confirm the OP's statement about Apple always charging unreasonable prices for RAM.

    5. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I just had not priced RAM for a while... although to value of RAM installation to me is larger than zero so that offsets the extra cost somewhat.

      But that still is a premium to be sure...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Correct, and?

    7. Re:Just $200 for 16GB RAM by rhook · · Score: 1

      Apple charges unreasonable prices for just about everything they sell. How do you think they've managed to get an obscene amount of profit? Sheep will be sheep.

  55. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Sancho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ethernet is ubiquitous!

    What? That's patently absurd. It may be available at the office or at home, but anywhere else you're at least as likely to have wireless, and in many, many places, it's your only option.

    The hotel I stayed at last week only had wireless.

    The restaurants I ate at had only wireless.

    My local coffee shop only has wireless.

    Remember, the common image of the Apple user is of the screenplay writer sitting at Starbucks. Ethernet does no good in that scenario.

  56. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 0

    The need is always relative to your own needs. I know a color blind person who has trouble with tablets with "acceptable" display resolutions depending on color schemes, but can make out the iPad "3" just fine due to the higher resolution.

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
  57. What is the problem with a dongle? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't see why people are hung up on a dongle. You have to have a cable, so what's the deal with a dongle being an issue? You could just leave it on the cable you know!

    The 27" monitor has an ethernet port on it as well, in case you use an external monitor at work or home...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why people are hung up on a dongle. You have to have a cable, so what's the deal with a dongle being an issue? You could just leave it on the cable you know!

      The 27" monitor has an ethernet port on it as well, in case you use an external monitor at work or home...

      If you only use your PC at home this is fine. But this is a laptop. I tought the goal was to be able to bring it with you?
      The problem is that you will end up having to bring the dongle too. Just in case you need to use an ethernet network. Also, this is the kind of thing that you will loose and will be expensive to replace.

    2. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      The deal with a dongle is carrying it with you. It is something you have to remember to take. Also, if you are walking around with just the laptop, it is something you have to have hanging off the side.

      For my main use, portable gaming, no it wouldn't matter much. However the lower end graphics rules it out for that anyhow. However for work, it would be a pain in the ass. Something else to cart around with the laptop and mess with.

    3. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Except that in practice, if you're going to do this, you need to carry the ethernet cable too... so just leave the dongle attached to it.

    4. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      You don't. There are ethernet cables everywhere (friend's place, hotel, etc.)

    5. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a cable. The cable is provided by the room. People want to take their laptops out of their office and bring them to a classroom or a conference room. Those rooms have projectors with cables already set up. They don't typically have apple convertor dongles. So if you forget your dongle in your office, you have to either go back for it, send someone else back for it, or try to borrow one from your audience. Your office might not even be in the same building as the conference room.

    6. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by Neil_Brown · · Score: 1

      The deal with a dongle is carrying it with you. It is something you have to remember to take

      For me, it just sits in my bag, along with the power supply and VGA adapter — it's less convenient that having an Ethernet port onboard for sure, but it's small enough to be no hassle and big enough not to get lost easily.

      That being said, I bought one for use at an event without Wi-Fi, and the only other time was configuring a friend's router — Wi-Fi has been easy enough to find when I've traveled, and I can always tether my phone if I don't need a connection to the place's local network. I thought I'd miss Ethernet, but it turns out that I don't in practice.

    7. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      > I don't see why people are hung up on a dongle. You have to have a cable, so what's the deal with a dongle being an issue?

      Because it is "yet another item to carry along and to keep track of". Some people like to say "less is more" :-P

      Oh there is already an ethernet cable. So why not 2 cables (or 3)? One cable is less complex than two.

    8. Re:What is the problem with a dongle? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't stay at the right hotels They have too-short cables, often for "rent". One time, the rent was more than me going across the road and buying a cable at retail price. The dongle just isn't that big of a deal.

  58. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

    I don't see anyone using it. Last time I used it was 2009.

  59. More real estate by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have a 17" laptop, the resolution is 1900x1200. To me, pixels are real-estate, I'm strongly considering getting this 15" as a replacement (only the tantalizing thought of a 17" in the next six months with even MORE resolution holds me back).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:More real estate by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      That would be great, but I don't think another 17-inch model is in the cards. A shame -- I've hungered for resolution like this for decades, and now that it's here, presbyopia will keep me from taking full advantage of it.

    2. Re:More real estate by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      (only the tantalizing thought of a 17" in the next six months with even MORE resolution holds me back).

      Won't happen. 17" is dead.

  60. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    I think Macs tend to make a rather poor budgeting choice.

    So Macs aren't the budget choice. And especially not the Pro range. If it's budget you want, there are plenty of other choices.

    Similarly buy a Kia rather than a BMW when you buy a car.

  61. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

    Ethernet is ubiquitous!

    No, WiFi is ubiquitous. Ethernet is becoming a legacy connections (like Serial, Parallel and all the other things no one puts on laptops anymore).

    I've been using a Macbook Air for the last year as my primary machine, and I've never missed having an Ethernet port. That includes last week when I had to do a "factory reset" of my WiFi router.

  62. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    A four and a half pound 15.4" laptop with a 2880x1800 screen.

  63. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by starless · · Score: 2

    The minority of people that are still ufing ethernet for laptops need to carry an ethernet cable with them anyway. It's no hardship to them to take a cable with a dongle in instead..

    It's a problem, speaking as a macbook air owner since the machine was first released, if you only use ethernet occasionally, and forget to take your adapter with you when traveling to a wi-fi poor region like Japan...

  64. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by prehistoricman5 · · Score: 1

    A laptop with a screen like that isn't designed for real work.

    --
    Fuck Beta
  65. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    "I already said i dont get it for my use case,"

    That is NOT what you said. There was no "my" in your post, and your statement "unless you are a graphics professional..." implies you're talking about everyone who is not a graphics professional. Little revisionist history hey?

    If you really did mean specifically for yourself... no offense, but nobody cares.

  66. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    Unless you are a graphics professional, i just dont see the use-case for it.

    You can see more stuff on your screen at once. You won't have to scroll as frequently. No disrespect intended, but it sounds like you've only been exposed to 1080 displays. To people who remember, the value of CRTs was that you could run ridiculously-high resolutions-- 1080 sucks. I'm one of those people who has hated LCD displays because I'm sick of not being able to put two documents on the screen at once and see them side-by-side.

    Retina for a desktop environment will be fantastic.

    seth

  67. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get the impression that every one of my friends with a laptop has used eterhnet at sometime or another

    "How can Nixon have won? Nobody I know voted for him!"

    Given the increasing ubiquity of free wifi and 3g/4g hotspots built into cell phones, I suspect that the the number of people "needing ethernet" is rather smaller than you think.

  68. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    I don't know too many frequent travelers that don't carry around an AirPort Express

    I dont know too many who know how or have the desire to use an AirPort Express, let alone own one. Ive never set one up, but presumably you have to configure it with an SSID and key, which is beyond many users. Ethernet "just works" in far more scenarios, far more reliably.

  69. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a lot of users, wired networking isn't just a nice-to-have, it's a major feature. These users will be forced to buy one or more dongles to carry with them and invariably occasionally lose. The thinner form-factor and weight reduction of a few milligrams won't be seen as an advantage when compared with the hassle of dealing with dongles.

    Personally, I leave my MBP plugged in wherever it's an option, whether at home, the office or on the road. It's faster, more secure and more reliable than wifi.

  70. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    I have one for my Air. It fits in my pocket. Or the pocket of the case my air is in. It really is no big deal.

  71. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still holding out for a new model with a built in acoustical coupler. There are still plenty of hotel rooms that have no ethernet or wifi but do have phones. Those wall plugs are hard to reach for older folks. Cmon Apple...

  72. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    Are you saying that Laptop should be held up thickness wise, at the point where the body can accomodate an RJ45?

    Oh come on, this isnt a difficult engineering problem. You have a springloaded pop-out RJ45 jack that is a rigid frame with 8 electrical connector pins. Ive seen it done on older laptops. It doesnt need to be terribly thick (just thick enough for rigidity), and doesnt require a dongle.

  73. Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda like iPhone 4s with iOS 5 was never allowed? Oh wait, IT WAS!!!!!

    1. Re:Really. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Or the iPad 2 ran iOS 3, or the iPhone 3GS ran iPhoneOS 2...

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Really. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...iOS 4, rather.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  74. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please point out some of these "awesome" sub-500 laptops. Really. Put up or shut up.

  75. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except that floppy disk isnt rarely used. I get the impression that every one of my friends with a laptop has used floppy disk at sometime or another (if not on a regular basis) because its more reliable than cdrom, and it just works even if you know nothing about removable media.

    Your post reminded me of some stuff people were saying when the iMac came out and was missing features people claimed were essential at the time.

    seth

  76. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SilverJets · · Score: 2

    Count me as someone that never gets that "Apple is overpriced you can get a cheaper laptop...blah...blah...blah" argument.

    Hey, Lexus is over priced. And honestly...it really is just a Toyota. So why not just buy a Toyota and save that money?

  77. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

    The thing is, other than the screen, the Macs tend to be worse spec-wise than that half-priced PC. They also tend on average to last 3 years, with the Macs lasting (if the propaganda being believed) 3-5. This means after 5 years, I have a much newer laptop with far superior specs at the same price as that one Mac, not to mention not carrying around a gigantic thief-magnet.

    Spending oodles of cash on a computer very rarely makes sense due to the incredible rate of development there. Possibly if the MPG were going up by 150% every year, people would be less likely to fork out $30k+ on vehicles either, because it would be a terrible investment.

  78. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Troll

    http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/302078
    Core i5 sandybridge with 4GB RAM ($30 upgrade to 8), 500GB drive; all for $479.

    http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/302125
    Core i7 Ivy Bridge, 8GB RAM, 1TB drive. All for $799.

    Please point me to a similar Mac that is less than double those prices.

  79. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've had such shitty experiences with Apple, I honestly think that they survive because no one will admit having trouble with something they willingly overpaid for.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  80. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first statement stands. He's not very bright.

  81. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

    Then buy a boss $500 screen, keyboard, and mouse, and get some real work done, and have enough money left over for a second laptop.

    Seriously, I hope you arent in charge of budgeting anywhere, because there are very few people who need a 2880x1800 screen for work, and those that do are very likely going to fork over for a station (keyboard, mouse, spare screen) as well which pretty much kills the point of having an integrated hi-def screen.

    Most people do just fine on a 1366x768 screen. Ive recommended the model I am using (HP probook) to a large number of clients spanning healthcare, business development, consulting, and other fields, and basically all of them LOVE the laptops and do "real" work on them. The only complaints have been that the 15" screen was too LARGE.

  82. iWork? SDK improvements other than plumbing? by DougDew · · Score: 1

    Was there any mention of a new version of iWork? All that I heard was that iWork would gain the ability to work with iCloud documents. Also, was there any mention of OpenGL or OpenCL or Core Animation or Xcode? It seemed that most of the software development announcements were related to connectivity plumbing.

    1. Re:iWork? SDK improvements other than plumbing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you log into your developer account to see the API changes in iO6 and get the Xcode 4.4 preview... duh. They're not going to tell you about new options in the way you declare NSMutableArrays in a fucking keynote speech bro.

  83. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    640k is enough for anyone :)

  84. 8GB RAM LOL by DarthVain · · Score: 0

    8GB of RAM is 50$
    256GB SSD is 200$
    3.6Ghz Quad i7 is 300$

    That is all retail.

    So 1649$ gets you 7h of battery, 2880x1800 resolution screen, and a shiny box.

    Seriously for the amount of power you put in this thing, could the designers not have put in 16GB of RAM? I mean it is dirt cheap compared to everything. Even if they are hard up for space and have to pay a premium for two 8GB sticks, it is still peanuts (or even one 16GB stick if that exists, of course designing a MB with one memory slot is pretty bad design anyway).

    I hate to say it, but when did Apple get cheap? (not that 2199$ is cheap, but selling a 2199$ computer with 8GB RAM is.)

    1. Re:8GB RAM LOL by Sancho · · Score: 1

      All throughout the industry, computer manufacturers charge high premiums for extras like RAM and a better CPU. Apple's no different (despite their "think different" motto from years past.)

      You can get 16GB of RAM on this laptop--for $200 more. At least that's cheaper than what Dell charges to go from 8->16 on their Precision M4600 (the low-end of which only comes with 2GB of RAM, incidentally.)

    2. Re:8GB RAM LOL by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      I did a quick price comparison at Newegg (but for desktop components). I can't get the panel that small and keep the resolution, but everything else is comparable. The price comes out to $2450 before tax and shipping, and I'd still have to put it together and install the OS.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
  85. When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3.0 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3.0?? and newer video cards?

    Why just update the laptops and not the desktops?

  86. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in Japan late last year, I took my Air (but didn't forget my dongle) and my Airport Express because the hotel did, indeed, lack WiFi. If I had forgotten it, though, I'm sure I could have stopped at the Ginza Apple Store (or possibly found one in a vending machine at Narita) on the way to my hotel in Shizuoka. Sure, it would have been a slight inconvenience, but I would have had one if it were absolutely necessary.

  87. Snow Leopard compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can anyone confirm that these new Mac platforms are capable of loading and running Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6)? We never released Lion to our environment at my company thanks to its issues with Active Directory. Thanks.

    1. Re:Snow Leopard compatibility? by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Probably not unless you use Parallels or VMWare.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    2. Re:Snow Leopard compatibility? by kthreadd · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a general rule of thumb, new Macs never ever supports older versions of the OS than the version they shipped with. This goes down to the dot-version, so if it shipped with 10.7.4 it probably doesn't even boot 10.7.3.

    3. Re:Snow Leopard compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't sound very enterprise friendly.

      Over here we just upgraded to Windows XP.

  88. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Thunderbolt? Did I miss something? Is a USB dongle which you can buy new for $30 not fast enough?

    For me it's not an issue of speed, it's an issue of me not wanting to use up a USB port for it. The only thing for me that really eases the pain of the lack of ethernet is that they have TWO thunderbolt ports, I can use one of those for the ethernet instead.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  89. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by nwf · · Score: 1

    I mostly use my laptop at home. I have wifi, which is fine for general web browsing. When I want to copy files, I dig out an Ethernet cable and plug it into one of the 20 jacks in my house so I can transfer at gigabit speeds. I have tons of Ethernet cables all over the place, including in the coffee table. I can't see purchasing more than one $30 adapter and keeping them everywhere. So it will be less convenient, but then again, I have no plans to purchase a $2200 laptop to surf the web on.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  90. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing is, other than the screen, the Macs tend to be worse spec-wise than that half-priced PC.

    Bullshit.

    They also tend on average to last 3 years, with the Macs lasting (if the propaganda being believed) 3-5. This means after 5 years, I have a much newer laptop with far superior specs at the same price as that one Mac

    Pardon? You're trying to paint the longer useful life of Macs as a negative?

    They also keep their value better, so whereas you'll be junking that 3 year old Wintel, you'll be getting a decent price on eBay for a 3 year old Mac.

    not to mention not carrying around a gigantic thief-magnet.

    Yeah. Were back to the Kia vs BMW again. Your recommendation seems to be buy something that's undesirable, so that no one will steal it. How can I say this. No. Things that are desirable are desirable for a reason. You can keep the crap.

  91. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethernet is on my desk. Its at home. The places where you want fast, secure connectivity.

    1000 Mbps full duplex ethernet kicks the shit out of 600 Mbps half duplex 802.11n any day.

    The only way to connect to an ethernet network is by plugging in. However with wifi, any asshat with a wifi card can sit in the neighborhood and sniff your packets. Since WEP, WPA, and WPA2 are all crackable, you can never be assured your traffic isn't being intercepted.

    Thanks, I'll keep my ethernet port.

  92. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just effectively admitted that Apple lovers are motivated by emotions instead of a rational judgement. If it were the latter, then being autistic would not prevent you from liking Apple products.

  93. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For accessing a NAS via GbE? Nope, a $5 USB2 10/100 adapter for $30 ain't gonna cut it.

  94. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Idaho · · Score: 1

    I think Macs tend to make a rather poor budgeting choice.

    Typing this message on my more than 4-year old $1000 (cheapest model) MacBook with 440 full battery cycles and still decent (2-3h) battery live, I disagree.

    I would like to see how that sub-$500 laptop is doing after 4 years...my bet is you'd probably need to retrieve it from a landfill first.

    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  95. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

    If you've set an Airport Express up once, then it "just works" in any scenario in which a direct Ethernet connection "just works". It is bulkier to carry around, though, but means you can sit on the hotel balcony without needing a 10ft RJ45 cable. And, also, if you can't manage to set up an Airport Express using the utility it comes with, then you'll need to help to use a computer in any useful capacity at all.

  96. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

    They damn well better start rolling them out. I've been waiting for a decent resolution like this at a decent price for ages, and I've almost lowered my values enough to buy a Mac. If I don't see other manufacturers coming out with them in the next year, it could happen.

  97. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    What is your wireless router hooked to the modem with? Oh, thats right, ethernet. What connection will cheaply (~$200) support 48 simultaneous gigabit connections? Ethernet.

    Good luck getting your small business to invest in a mesh of Wifi APs capable of that throughput for that many users.

    I would also remark that if you dont have daily access to an ethernet port, you either dont have a job / go to school, or else are in the minority.

  98. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by CannonballHead · · Score: 2

    Er, what? Your color blind friend can't see color (in nature?) but can see it on an iPad 3?

  99. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    A laptop with a screen like that is almost required if you're running an IDE without a large external monitor (as in developing while away from the office).

  100. Can we say vendor lock-in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "By not purchasing standard parts, we can create a product that's more elegant and more efficient."

    So, the SSDs in these things are a proprietary Apple part? I fail to see how that is more 'elegant' and 'efficient'. Breeding your own standard is not elegant, when there are already products on the market that comply with standards that do the same job. And it is hardly efficient to create a whole production line for components when there are off-the-shelf options available.

    No. This this a blatant attempt to move to the iPhone/iPad/iPod model where users buy a fixed storage capacity device (that can never be upgraded), and customers have to pay exorbitant sums for small bumps in storage capacity (that and push users to buying Thunderbolt drives).

    About the only thing this is elegant and efficient about this is increasing the profitability for Apple.

    1. Re:Can we say vendor lock-in? by Kergan · · Score: 2

      So, the SSDs in these things are a proprietary Apple part? I fail to see how that is more 'elegant' and 'efficient'.

      You must have been living under a rock in recent months. Apple bought Anobit last December.

    2. Re:Can we say vendor lock-in? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, you should search for "mSata", which is a standard.

  101. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Congratulations, you just summed up the attitudes of Apple users everywhere

    IM THE ONLY ONE WHO MATTERS.

  102. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by amoeba1911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I got an ipad 2 and it came with a bubble under the screen, a glaring manufacturing defect that should have been caught by a simple visual inspection. So, I had to bring it to the customer service (I refuse to call it genius bar because any dumbass is smarter than those idiots). I was the first one in the store because I hate the place even more when it gets crowded, it starts to smell like a sweaty locker room, but even though I was the first person there I still had to wait about 45 minutes for them to get me a replacement one.

  103. You underestimate academics by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Nearly 400 years later, they are still disentangling Shakespeare's vulgar jokes. Some people need to grow up. Our English teacher (Newnham, Cambridge) took huge delight in showing that our school version of Merchant of Venice had removed a reference to incontinence but completely missed a vulva joke. I imagine that there will be future PhD theses on early Internet memes.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  104. Re:When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3 by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3.0?? and newer video cards?

    The Mac Pro: probably never, but since it's full of PCIe slots you can always slap in a USB3 card. I also guess a lot of Mac Pro customers will also be yanking out the stock video card and putting in an expensive specialist one. This is not a product with a long future ahead of it.

    The iMacs and the Mini will probably get upgraded later.

    The new MBP had to be announced at WWDC because, now the circus is over, its a developer conference and they want to talk to developers about support for the retina display.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  105. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    For me, and plenty of people I'm sure, ethernet is as rarely used a firewire. Maybe your situation is different, but that doesn't make it typical.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  106. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're already can, the $29 adapter on the store is just a 10/100 usb2 adapter.
    The Thunderbolt GigE one will likely be a *hair* more expensive.

  107. buy the extended warranty by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    because with it you can sell that two year old computer still covered by at least one year more. It goes a long way to making it easy to pass it to the next guy when the latest model catches your eye.

    Been there, done that, through three iMacs and a Macbook Pro.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  108. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    I cant comment as I've never seen one.

    But really, it's a pointless discussion. Ethernet for laptops is almost dead. Laptops are made to be mobile.

    It might not be dead for you, but then you present yourself as a budget computer buyer, so it's hardly surprising you're behind the times on technology. Very few real potential purchasers of a MBP are going to be put off by the lack of inbuilt ethernet. Any more than they were put off by the removal of floppy disks, RS232, Centronics printer ports, and VGA.

  109. overboard by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    This is completely overboard.

    On one end we have every laptop with a stupid 1366x768 resolution - and a few with 1440x900.
    On the other end we have this $2200 thing with 2880x1800.

    Can't we get something that's more middle of the line? 1920x1080 on a 14" laptop would be more than great. 1920x1200 on a 15" laptop would be spectacular. 2880x1800 on a 15" screen is just a idiotic. They've gone overboard. You don't even find 2880x1800 on 27" screens, on a 15" screen this is going to be too small to be of any use.

    1. Re:overboard by makomk · · Score: 1

      As others have said, it's presumably for the same reason as the iPad has an absurdly high resolution - since Mac OS X isn't resolution independent, they'll be using pixel-doubling to pretend it's a rather more conventional 1440x900 screen to existing applications.

    2. Re:overboard by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can't we get something that's more middle of the line? 1920x1080 on a 14" laptop would be more than great. 1920x1200 on a 15" laptop would be spectacular.

      You can have 1920x1080 on a 15" laptop today - most high-end laptop lines offer it as an option. Look at Thinkpads for an example.

      on a 15" screen this is going to be too small to be of any use.

      Not if you scale the UI up accordingly. The point of resolution that high is not to squeeze more into the screen. It's to make things look better. So e.g. a line of text rendered at 10pt will remain at the same physical size as on an old 15" Pro, but will now have 4x more pixels used to render it, making it that much sharper. If you look at iPad 2 and 3 side by side, this kind of thing is easily visible.

  110. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Troll

    The thing is, other than the screen, the Macs tend to be worse spec-wise than that half-priced PC.

    Bullshit.

    Rather than retyping it, I will refer you to these two (rather short and sweet) posts.
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2908871&cid=40288291
    WHat you can get for $480 and 800 these days in the PC worlds.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2906441&cid=40279409
    A look both now and a year ago at how you can get a better laptop at half the price.

    And I would gladly beat the specs (excluding monitor) of ANY macbook you could throw at me, for half the price or less. If I were feeling daring I might even offer to let you choose what brand of laptop I have to use; its not like these are hard to find prices or anything.

    The thing is, 8GB of ram is more and more becoming standard, where Apple still wants to charge you a $200 upgrade for that extra $40 stick of RAM. If you cant see how badly theyre gouging you, I really suggest you do a little more research.

  111. It's actually dirt cheap by Kergan · · Score: 1

    I've been playing around on Apple's site in the last half hour and, frankly, it turns out to be dirt cheap.

    Take any of the previous MBA or MBP, 13" or 15" as applicable, and then play around with the options. Boost its specs so it comes as close as you can get to a Retina MBP. ...

    Back? Shockingly low, isn't it?

  112. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your wireless router hooked to the modem with?

    Ethernet but then again my router stays in one place while my laptop goes everywhere.

  113. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    And, also, if you can't manage to set up an Airport Express using the utility it comes with, then you'll need to help to use a computer in any useful capacity at all.

    You dont do IT for a living, do you? There are many users who could figure that out and would pop the CD in and begin configuring it; but there are at least as many who would immediately call their IT guy or geek friend because experience has led them to believe that if they try, and screw it up, it will much more difficult than if they had just called their techie friend to begin with.

  114. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Naffer · · Score: 1

    My 3 year old 15" Dell M4400 has a really nice 1http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/06/11/1757240/apple-news-from-wwdc-and-iphone-5-rumors#900x1200 display, but looking at their lineup now I don't think you can get anything bigger than 1080p, which means you lose out on a fair bit of vertical resolution. 1366x768 in the same size really doesn't cut it.

  115. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    A car is a long-term investment, and at least that lexus wont go badly out of date within 2 years-- its value will decline at something like 10-15% a year.

    After 3 years, a laptop's value has plummeted to roughly $50, and it makes little difference whether its a mac or not. They make pretty terrible investments.

  116. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Highest any affordable ($1k) CRT could do at useful refresh rate was 1600x1200.
    A 27" 2560x1440 IPS is $399.

  117. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    I would like to see how that sub-$500 laptop is doing after 4 years...my bet is you'd probably need to retrieve it from a landfill first.

    Ill let you know in 3 more years how my HP Probook is doing. $500 and a year later, and the battery still handles like a champ (~3-5 hours depending on usage), and quite snappy.

  118. Or never back up. by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2

    New graduates never seem to worry about network speed because they have presumably never had to back up virtual machines or database images. I had one tell me with utter confidence only two months ago that only people stuck in the 1990s worried about network speeds. Well, for baby one page PHP applications with a few hundred records he was right.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Or never back up. by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      New graduates never seem to worry about network speed because they have presumably never had to back up virtual machines or database images.

      When I have to move huge VM images or databases, I use an external hard drive. It's a lot faster and more reliable than wired Ethernet.

      For everything else, WiFi works just fine.

      And, didn't we have this exact same argument regarding parallel ports, serial ports, floppy disk drives and CD drives? How much do you miss all of those?

    2. Re:Or never back up. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, you can't move a VM image from a server in your datacenter to another server in your datacenter without ethernet or being physically present.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    3. Re:Or never back up. by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, you can't move a VM image from a server in your datacenter to another server in your datacenter without ethernet or being physically present.

      You can't move running VMs from machine to machine by copying them to an external hard drive. You can move VMs that are suspened or shut down that way.

      But what does that have to do with Ethernet ports on laptops? Do you really use MacBook Pros as your datacenter servers?

  119. You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Them weaving the golden cage more and more tightly every day creeps me out just as much as the next geek, but you have to admit, these guys are fucking amazing.

    Remember how shitty smartphones were before the iPhone?
    SJ said: No Flash and no carrier software on the iPhone.
    And thus endeth the era of Flash and crappy carrier scamware on phones.
    Btw., as a Flashdev I'm actually reorienting myself because of exact same incident.

    Remember how abysmally sad and sorry tablet computers were before the iPad?
    Along came Apple and sold 14 million of them tablets in the first 3 quarters. 14 fucking million!
    Thus endeth the era of Bill Gates half-assed vision of bizarly overpriced and unwieldy tablet computers.

    And now this.
    Notice how these days every geek worth his salt is bickerin about stagnation and retreat in laptop display resolution? We had a story on this here just a week ago or so.
    BAM! New MB Pro. Ahead of the pack at least 1,5 generations, hitting every other vendor on the planet on the back of their head with a Louisville Slugger Class cluestick in terms of laptop screen paradigms and a few other things.
    Just plain awesome, I have to say. ... Just wait for the MB Pro rippoffs poping up in about a year or so, just like the Ultrabook stuff.

    Apple is burning more and more Karma with me each day, but they sure to make quite a bit of it up in spades at times. Today is such a time I'd say. Cudos to them, and respect.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah those Samsung developed "retina" panels sure are pretty nice

    2. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And now this.
      Notice how these days every geek worth his salt is bickerin about stagnation and retreat in laptop display resolution? We had a story on this here just a week ago or so.
      BAM! New MB Pro. Ahead of the pack at least 1,5 generations, hitting every other vendor on the planet on the back of their head with a Louisville Slugger Class cluestick in terms of laptop screen paradigms and a few other things.

      Heh, 1.5 generations. Nevermind that there's current production UMPCs (Fujitsu UH900) already with ~20% higher pixel density, and years-old machines (Thinkpad T60) were available with 75% of the pixel density as an option -- discontinued not because Lenovo needs a cluestick, but because people weren't buying it.

      Apple did a great thing here, but it has nothing to do with the manufacturers, who repeatedly test the waters of high-density displays and find NOBODY WILL PAY EXTRA FOR THEM... even post-Vista, which finally "fixed" font rendering -- with a horrible hack, but it made it viable -- and still, almost nobody will buy them. What Apple has done is convinced CONSUMERS that high resolution is worth paying extra for, and now those manufacturers can start dropping those IDTech screens in their laptops and expect a much larger percentage of consumers to pay a premium instead of complaining about "font's too small".

      I'm glad Apple did it, but I'm pissed as all hell that Apple's the one who could do it. Why is it that nerds can go around blogging at the top of there lungs about crap resolution, talk to the people they know, and on and on, disseminating truth, and all most consumers hear is the marketing guys crying "HD!" -- why is it that this marketing can only be countered by other marketing (itself just as evil, based as it is on the fundamental and IMO deliberate error of conflating samples and cycles, although affording a better outcome) -- in short, why are people so STUPID! Or not really stupid, but susceptible to being persuaded of anything by lying-ass marketers?

      It would really destroy my faith in humanity if I had any left from last time.

    3. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UH900 has a fucking 5 inch screen are you really comparing that to a fucking 15 inch laptop? get real bro. Why would anyone buy a retarded little toy pc when they could get a fucking iPhone for less?

    4. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah those Samsung developed "retina" panels sure are pretty nice

      Who do you think footed the bill for Samsung to develop them and put them into volume production?

      The PC industry outside Apple tends to operate in race-to-the-bottom mode, and what you get out of that is volume production of an endless stream of crappy 1366x768 TN LCD panels. They're put into laptops marketed on how large the display is rather than the resolution and viewing angle and display quality, but that's OK. When the main differentiator between a crowd of mediocre products is price, inches per dollar is the metric most buyers will look at.

      Super high res LCD panels aren't even a new thing. They've been around for a loooooong time. But nobody has ever committed in a big way to shipping them in volume, so they've always been an extremely expensive niche product. The unique thing that Apple does is to ignore low end and most of the midrange, and focus on shipping a relatively high end product in volume. Apple wants to ship Retina in every unit they make, not just a few halo models that sell 10K units. Give it a year or two and I bet Apple will no longer sell any non-Retina displays.

      Because Apple can't get high volume manufacturing of parts like this from the industry standard parts bin, Apple pays up. They not only pay to have new (and custom) parts developed, they often invest heavily in new factories for their partners to make them in. In return, they tend to be able to get contract terms allocating all the production to Apple for a year or two or three. Not just to give Apple an exclusive, but also to guarantee sufficient volume for Apple.

      Please note that I'm not saying that Apple is the fount of all progress or anything dumb like that. Just that they do actually push some things forward, even when they aren't developing the technology themselves, and "Retina" displays are a pretty good example of that. One area where they don't have quite as much clout is the integrated GPU; if they could have their way I'm sure that Intel's GPUs would be much better than they currently are.

    5. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it has more pixels than an iPhone, more convenient input devices than an iPhone, and more apps than an iPhone. Silly little thing called a PC -- if you're in the small set of people who need one in a highly mobile form-factor, you're not gonna buy an iPhone.

      It's almost like UMPCs and smartphones are different devices for different purposes, and UMPCs are much more like laptops than smartphones, which is why GP's comparison makes perfect sense. (And apparently you can't touch his other point with the IBMs -- which pretty much defeats the "generation and a half" bullshit itself; more like a half-generation ahead of a megastagnant market, or almost to where we ought to be.)

      But since you go around saying shit like "get real bro", it's ok if you can't understand that. Nobody expects you to.

    6. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're wrong. How many other phones does not have crapware on them? When Android fanbois talk about choice, they're talking about the choice of crappy carrier crapware they get pre-installed.

    7. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by rhook · · Score: 1

      That high-res display is useless when the OS doubles the DPI of everything on-screen.

    8. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot how awful portable music players were before the iPod. Well, except for the wireless capability :)

    9. Re:You have to admit: Apple nailed it once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the market is nothing like phone market. Apple tried before and failed to take over due to pricing.

  120. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    And they're crappy build quality, break, have bad connections, and sacrifice horizontal depth space to save vertical space.

    If you have one port that can do everything, why wouldn't you want to maximize that port type and rely on dongles instead? Do you also want dedicated keyboard and mouse ports back on your laptop instead of using USB?

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  121. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy an adapter in Japan and dump it before you leave. Simple.

  122. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    You have obviously not test driven recent Kias. BMWs are no longer effortlessly superior; indeed some of their engines for use in German cars are made in England. They are a brand.

    Porsche, now...

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  123. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Please tell me youre not claiming that Gigabit ethernet is going obsolete due to the mighty power of Wireless N.

    See, with that iMac story, Apple was phasing it out because there were more widely used, better alternatives out there. There isnt, with GigE, because WIreless N has barely the same real-world bandwith of 100mbit ethernet.

    Maybe if your entire day revolves around going to the coffee shop, ethernet is irrelevant; but for the vast majority of business use out there it is very much alive.

  124. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe youre right when it comes to Mac users, but I have a feeling there will be droves of employees rushing out to buy one when they realize that in order to connect to corporate network on their Mac they need ethernet.

  125. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. ONE
    I bought a laptop two weeks ago to replace my older 1200x800 corpse, and the current offerings are depressing because XP made 1024x768 standard about 12 years ago.

    Sad that this ONE trendy company out there has the power to force all others to add 1000 pixels per dimension. Sadder that everyone held back for years because it's just now finally cool to get our stolen resolutions back... with interest, and at higher densities that were reserved for 24+ inch monitors. We'll have to wait about 3 years for copy cats to prepare production lines, expected premiums for first adopters to drop, and then for market forces to make it NORMAL to get it in a standard-ish laptop.

    A few posters on the CNET live coverage forums shortsightedly criticized Apple's move because "the extra resolution is wasted if you can't see it" but we haven't had any extra DPI in a decade --it went down, actually. You can notice that even at 1600x900 text looks too computery in today's low dpi monitors.

    Take reading Slashdot... Zooming requires several iterations where GUI elements get realigned while text "readability" remains unimproved despite slight font size increases. Keep going, and a huge bump happens where, say, a four pixel [period] is replaced by about EIGHT without anything pleasing in between. I saw the retina displays up close and compared with the last generation iPad side by side, and then ran google maps side by side to see how the overlaid circles benefited. That perfectly non-pixelated circle yellow I saw in the iPad 3 is something I had been dreaming about since the old NES days, and needs to become more of a standard everyone. ASAP.

  126. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by clampolo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Er, what? Your color blind friend can't see color (in nature?) but can see it on an iPad 3?

    They are a magical thing. I used to have herpes before I saw the iPad 3 display

  127. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by prehistoricman5 · · Score: 1

    Oh I know that nobody needs a 2880x1800 screen (myself included) and that most people are just fine with 1366x768. It's just that I have a laptop with a 1366x768 screen and I do real work on it and it's far too cramped. I make do with it because it's what I've got but if I had room in my budget for something with a screen resolution bigger than 1366x768 I'd buy it.

    --
    Fuck Beta
  128. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The minority of people that are still ufing ethernet for laptops need to carry an ethernet cable with them anyway. It's no hardship to them to take a cable with a dongle in instead. Meanwhile the majority who use WiFi now get a better laptop.

    Bingo. I don't understand why people seem to neglect this this point when arguing the importance of RJ45 connectors in notebooks. If I think the place is ethernet only there' no way I'm relying on an extra cable floating around. I understsand the argument of supporting legacy hardware but this is the only way to push the envelope forward sometimes. Insert generic Henry Ford quote about faster horses here.

  129. 2 years? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

    Is it me or does it seem than Apple is upgrading their hardware every 2 years? No mini, iMac or MacBook improvements. It seams this year they upgraded the models which they skipped last year.

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    1. Re:2 years? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Apple made updates last year: Thunderbolt and Sandy Bridge processors. As for each model, they don't get all updated at once or same amount of features. Mac Pro is the one model that got the fewest upgrades.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  130. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the problem. People are starting to think of laptops as fashion statements foremost, rather than as tools. It's fine to want good aesthetics (a good-looking laptop is nicer than a bad-looking one), but one should never give up functionality for the sole purpose of aesthetics.

    Not having your shoulder ache from a heavy load is a functional requirement.

  131. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Amouth · · Score: 1

    if they gave the macbook air a docking station i'd be fine, but how it is i'll stick to my x series lenovos to get work done.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  132. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Optic7 · · Score: 0

    It's fine to want good aesthetics (a good-looking laptop is nicer than a bad-looking one), but one should never give up functionality for the sole purpose of aesthetics.

    Unfortunately Apple has been going down the path of form over function in design for a good while now, particularly with their laptops: aluminum bodies that look beautiful but dent if you hit them with anything, "chiclet" keyboards that look cute but are nowhere near as friendly to a human's hands as something like the classic Thinkpad keyboard, non-user replaceable batteries, glossy screens full of glare, etc. So these new moves are no surprise. What other useful things will be gone in the next generation?

  133. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    I have no idea when it comes to Mac users, I don't own any Apple products. And I haven't seen a corporate network that required Ethernet either. But why are users using their own hardware on corporate networks anyway?

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  134. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Relayman · · Score: 1

    "Typical users" can always buy a Dell, Sony or Toshiba with even a VGA port!

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  135. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's hardly going to break the budget for a top of the line $2,199 laptop buyer.

    It has never really been about the price of the dongle. It is about the availability of functionality when I need it.

    If I walk into an office that doesn't have wifi, they'll invariably point me to a wall jack and hand me an ethernet cable. They won't have a dongle. If I didn't bring mine, or forgot it, or lost it. Then I'm pretty much fucked.

    A $2200 laptop where I have to carry around a separate bag of "parts" to restore the functionality that every other laptop has built in is a joke. The display adapters situation was bad enough.

  136. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Relayman · · Score: 1

    Most of my corporate networks are wireless now. Just open the lid and get to work.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  137. Things happen by Quila · · Score: 1

    We had a convention recently and one of the presenters forgot to bring his display dongle for his Mac.

    Regardless of what you're using, the possibility of not having the proper connector for a situation exists, unless you have a laptop with every known port.

    1. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Funny

      Requiring a dongle for an ubiqitous need like USB is just stupid beyond belief. That alone is a reason I will never own an ipad, even if it was not a walled garden and a DRM trap, which it is, so there are two more reasons I will never own one. Just saying.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Things happen by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Requiring a dongle for an ubiqitous need like USB is just stupid beyond belief. That alone is a reason I will never own an ipad

      Luckily for Apple they have 600 million customers who are more rational than you.

    3. Re:Things happen by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Requiring a dongle for an ubiqitous need like USB is just stupid beyond belief. That alone is a reason I will never own an ipad, even if it was not a walled garden and a DRM trap, which it is, so there are two more reasons I will never own one. Just saying.

      You mean like how the Samsung Galaxy Tab series needs one of these for USB? Or one of these for regular SD cards?

    4. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Requiring a dongle for an ubiqitous need like USB is just stupid beyond belief. That alone is a reason I will never own an ipad

      Luckily for Apple they have 600 million customers who are more rational than you.

      It must be great having 600 million gullible customers. To tell the truth, I don't care what they do with their grocery money, I was talking about me.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the reason I (and many others judging from the forum traffic) did not get a Galaxy tab. Luckily, there is plenty of choice in the Android market and I doubt Samsung will make the mistake of leaving out the USB port again.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Things happen by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I doubt Samsung will make the mistake of leaving out the USB port again.

      They did. The second-generation Tab 2 series doesn't have an integrated USB port either.

      A quick check on the Best Buy's tablet selection:
      Samsung: no
      Lenovo: no
      Sony: no
      Toshiba: yes
      Acer: yes

      So while it's great you have choices for tablets with USB, it's not like USB ports are a big deal even on most major-brand Android tablets.

    7. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "Will" is future tense.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Things happen by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Ah well, if you have nothing interesting to talk about...

    9. Re:Things happen by Quila · · Score: 1

      USB is not a ubiquitous need for a tablet. Sure, some people may need it for certain situations, but for the most part it is not necessary for a tablet. I know many iPad owners, and not one of them has felt the need to buy the USB/flash adapter. Apple also tends to go with the concept of one storage source on iDevices, contrary to the confusion and trouble that Android provides with balancing your data between internal storage and SD cards (oh crap, I installed that app on the OTHER SD card).

      Apple tends to not use or to ditch things that are unnecessary for most or on their way out (floppies, optical drives in notebooks, legacy serial ports, VGA, etc.), and the industry tends to follow. If you need one of these things that will not be used by 90+% of users, get an adapter. Apple doesn't need to make the hardware larger, heavier and more complex to suit the small minority.

    10. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      USB is not a ubiquitous need for a tablet.

      Oh great. Just throw away the speak too. Look, nearly every interesting piece of electronics I own has a USB port. It is a requirement that my tablet have one too. Just one of many examples: midi in. No I don't want another dongle, it's enough of a mess as it is. Another example: all of my cameras. I'll stop there, I hope you get it. Maybe you only watch Youtube with your tablet.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    11. Re:Things happen by Quila · · Score: 1

      nearly every interesting piece of electronics I own has a USB port.

      I guess congratulations are in order?

      . It is a requirement that my tablet have one too.

      For you, fine, but that doesn't necessarily make it less useful for anyone else. Most cars today come with a cup holder whether people need it or not. A while back I bought a car without a cup holder. I didn't care. It was not a requirement for me.

      Just one of many examples: midi in. No I don't want another dongle, it's enough of a mess as it is.

      Good, let's throw MIDI in. And VGA too, that's still everywhere. While we're at it, we need a full-size DVI port, an HDMI port and RCA and component cable jacks. This tablet's going to be huge by the time we're done.

      Or we can put one slim multi-function port on the bottom, and you can buy a dongle for whatever kind of specific connection YOU, but not everybody, want to make.

    12. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Of course I meant that I don't want two dongles... a USB and a MIDI. Obviously, tablets are not coming with MIDI input any time soon. And you wasted perfectly good internet bandwidth with that comment exactly why? To avoid admitting that leaving out the USB port is a deficiency, whether Apple does it or Samsung does it? Well avoid away. I expect you will see dedicated USB ports on pretty well all Android tablets from now on, and I hope Apple continues to use a dongle for that because there should be as many reasons as possible to buy from somebody other than Apple.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:Things happen by Quila · · Score: 1

      Obviously, tablets are not coming with MIDI input any time soon

      Yes, I know, they're all deficient. All tablets should come with all the ports anyone could possibly need so that nobody has to carry a huge adapter around with him.

      To avoid admitting that leaving out the USB port is a deficiency, whether Apple does it or Samsung does it?

      Because it's not a deficiency. It's a feature that you and a small number of other people want, a feature that if implemented would compromise the size and design of the hardware (sorry, a full size USB port just isn't fitting on the iPad or other slim tablets).

    14. Re:Things happen by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      it's not a deficiency. It's a feature that you and a small number of other people want

      USB is a feature that a small number of people want? Why do you bother posting such drivel?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    15. Re:Things happen by Quila · · Score: 1

      USB is a feature that a small number of people want?

      No, a full-size USB port is a feature a small number of people want on a thin tablet. The iPad has USB functionality, but built into a slimmer multi-function port.

  138. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    but for the vast majority of business use out there it is very much alive.

    What bandwidth is the 'vast majority of business use out there' demanding? I proffer that 99.9999% of business users are passing around documents and files that are less than 200 mb throughout the day. If they're working with larger files, then a USB dongle is acceptable in the workplace.

    I work in an enterprise software firm. We have ethernet available, but the wifi seems to work just fine for all levels of the organization.

    I'm not suggesting GigE is disappearing. I'm saying that the majority of users in the majority of situations aren't needing it, so there's no compelling argument to build it into the device when doing so carries a price on form factor.

    Seth

  139. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by beelsebob · · Score: 1

    Actually, I tend to find Macs make a rather excellent budget choice...
    $500 laptop every year (roughly how long it takes for the owner to realise it has intel HD graphics that can't play WoW) that sells for $0 on ebay after that year;
    $2200 laptop every 2 years that sells for $1900 on ebay after those 2 years...

    I'll take the $150 a year proposition over the $500 a year one.

  140. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once, I missed an important presentation because I left my power adapter at home. I think that external power adapters and removable power cords are really stupid. Every computer needs to have a power adapter, and every computer needs a power cable. There's no reason not to build them right in, so you don't have to carry them around separately.

    In fact, I think Apple should build a retractable cord right into every laptop they sell. And I know the retractable cord technology is available, because I've had a spring-loaded retractable cord on my vacuum cleaner for years.

    I refuse to buy any Apple product until they listen to the consumer and include a spring-loaded retractable power cord inside every laptop.

  141. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Relayman · · Score: 1

    Yes, it makes quite a difference. Put my three-year old MacBook Pro next to a Dell and you will see the difference. The Dell will be missing at least one piece. You would be hard-pressed to tell that my MacBook Pro is not brand new. And it runs as fast as a new Dell.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  142. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Informative

    Rather than retyping it, I will refer you to these two (rather short and sweet) posts.
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2908871&cid=40288291
    WHat you can get for $480 and 800 these days in the PC worlds.

    Trouble is, even the best of the laptops you list there has a much worse spec than the new MBP. Slower CPU, same standard RAM, but yours not expandable beyond 8GB. Apple 512GB SSD vs your old 500GB HD. You do know what an SSD is don't you?

    And thats only the very basics.

    Thus your link proves that what you said was indeed bullshit.

    Anyway, enough of this shit. There's always a cheapskate who has no sense of quality who tries these stupid comparison, every time Apple releases a new groundbreaking computer. And it's like whac-a-mole. Prove them wrong on one computer comparison, and they'll go away, and pop up later with yet another failed attempt. I've better things to do. The WWDC keynote video is up now. I'd rather watch that than waste time with this nonsense.

  143. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We spent a few minutes scrounging around for one while someone worked on copying his presentation over to a PC.

    A presenter must always be prepared, validate their ability to deliver BEFORE getting up to present, and supply backup.

    These principles are ages old. Only the sloppy and lazy fail at them.

    Yes, blame the dongle - you can't hurt its feelings. But it this situation is exclusively the presenter's failure and no one else's.

  144. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by beelsebob · · Score: 1

    Except when you actually click through to the site, it's actually $1000 cheaper, not $1400... It's also got a screen less than half the resolution both vertically and horizontally (there's 1/5th the pixels on it!); with a screen that's TN, not IPS and hence has shit viewing angles; With a hard disk instead of an SSD; with a crap battery in comparison; with a touchpad that's crap in comparison; with a slower graphics chip; with no thunderbolt...

    Basically, if you want a cheaper laptop, fair enough... But don't try to claim that it's somehow anywhere near an equivalent machine.

  145. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The sub-500 laptop you linked is a turd.

    The other laptop is $799. Now I'm no math major, but that's a fair bit more expensive than "sub-$500."

    So you provide a link to a single piece of shit that's sub-500, as well as a link that is over 50% higher than your stated "awesome" price point, as your supporting evidence that "there are so many awesome sub-$500 laptops floating around."

    Please point me to a similar Mac that is less than double those prices.

    I guess you've never heard of their refurbished systems. Any one of those would perform at least as well as the "Sub-500" turd you produced, and several of them will hold up quite well against the $800 (NORMALLY $1600, but steeply discounted for a short time, probably to sell off some excess inventory) laptop as well.

  146. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, saving that few grams and the 0.1mm savings in profile height makes *all* the difference in portability.

    Apple fanbois: lack of a feature is a feature!

  147. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by beelsebob · · Score: 1

    You dont do IT for a living, do you? There are many users who could figure that out and would pop the CD in and begin configuring it

    Exactly... then you'll need help to use a computer in any useful capacity at all...

  148. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's hardly going to break the budget for a top of the line $2,199 laptop buyer.

    Exactly, let's face it. If you're buying a Mac it's not because it's the cheapest, most economical decision. It's like buying a BMW; sure you could get three Smart cars for the same price, but then you would have to drive it.

  149. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    All of your calculations are meaningless without including the cost of OSX, which you cant define so to you its nil. You cannot compare a Mac to a PC without also comparing the attendant OS. Yes apple gouges on Ram, we all know this. Mercedes-Benz gouges on spare parts, we all know this too.

    --
    Good-bye
  150. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Relayman · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What about software? You're not going to buy a word processor, spreadsheet, photo software, music editing software, DVD burner and movie maker for your computer? All included with every new Mac.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  151. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, photographers, graphic designers and video editors hate high res screens, clearly they'll have no use for this!

  152. wifi much slower for many things by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I've benched my laptop using wifi vs wired. For really high bandwidth stuff (dumping big files around) wired is far superior, even compared to double-channel 5GHz with line-of-site to the access point.

    1. Re:wifi much slower for many things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've benched my laptop using wifi vs wired. For really high bandwidth stuff (dumping big files around) wired is far superior, even compared to double-channel 5GHz with line-of-site to the access point.

      Nobody seriously thinks 802.11n is going to compete with GbE for that.

      Here's the thing, though. I'm another of those people who started using a MacBook Air when they released the Sandy Bridge model. I find that 99% of my large-file network usage is for Time Machine backups. And, well, the thing is... those backups happen silently, in the background, as long as I'm close to my home WiFi network. I don't notice the (lack of) network performance at all. Because it's reading from a SSD, the backup process doesn't hurt the performance of the machine at all, so I'm totally oblivious even if it takes forever because it's got a few gigabytes to move.

  153. I want the extra information density by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I'm a software guy. I would love to be able to run with a web browser, several files open (being coded), and several lab displays showing live status all visible simultaneously. I'm currently at 1920x1200, I would love to have more pixels available to play with. I've got good eyes, I can tolerate small fonts as long as they're detailed.

  154. sure hope they allow smaller fonts... by Chirs · · Score: 1

    If they don't, then they're not serving their market that actually has functioning eyesight but would like more information density.

  155. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Relayman · · Score: 1

    I use an HP Color LaserJet 2820 All-in-One Color Laser for faxing from my Mac. Works like a charm and works with wireless as well. By getting the fax modem, I saved $100 on the purchase price.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  156. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woah, integrated webcam, Apple came out with? That's fairly inaccurate, there were laptops with built-in webcams before. They might have started with the back-lit keyboards (which I still consider a daft idea. I mean, who looks at their keyboards while typing now a days, right?), but definitely not int. webcams.

  157. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    You're kind of a dick arent you. I already said i dont get it for my use case, but i could see the use case for it. To me its a nicety, but whatever. I gave up caring about monitor resolution when 1080p became de facto.

    For me > 1024 pixels vertical is the killer feature. Two things; 1) you can practically view an entire A4 document without paging; 2) you have more lines vertical in your editor than the average joe. If you are understanding someone else's code, you always want to have more lines on screen than he did since it lets you see more of the surrounding code more quickly. Remember it's much harder to add monitors above your current one than it is beside it.

    Horizontal resolution is mostly needed for watching videos. That's a completely different issue (though having two A4 side by side and still being able to type in an editor is nice).

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  158. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (For our part, we're going to have to buy a Mac video dongle for the projector to make sure this doesn't happen again. We're paying for the Mac users' aesthetic tastes. But at least it's damn cheaper than making 150 people wait.)

    Any competent location that is having random people walk in with laptops and hook up to their display system will already have a variety of said dongles on-hand and tested with their display system so they know exactly what tweaks might need to be done. You FAILED from the get-go if you "wasted 7.5 hours of time."

  159. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Then buy a Dell or Thinkpad. Oops, except since those are 2-3x as thick as this new laptop, you'd have to carry 15 Ethernet dongles to match their thickness and weight.

    It's not for everybody, but don't pretend that it's a "joke"

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  160. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, the answer turns out to be "same price":

    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD463ZM/A

    One reason for the high cost of Thunderbolt devices is that right now, they always need an extra chip to convert between TB and PCIe. The other main reason is low volume. Perhaps this is the first fully integrated Thunderbolt device (that is, the active circuitry consists of a single chip integrating a TB interface, Ethernet MAC, and GbE PHY). Or perhaps Apple is just treating this as a loss leader to kickstart higher sales volumes for TB interface chips, which would help reduce TB peripheral prices across the board.

    What's a little bit crazy about this pricing is that Apple is still selling their 2m Thunderbolt cable for $50.

    GP is wrong, though, you definitely won't be able to get this for $3 from Monoprice. It's not just wires and pins, it's literally a PCI Express NIC.

  161. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    And you can still buy a macbook pro with ethernet. Not sure why you think that's a problem.

    My macbook air connects to ethernet as well, via by tbolt monitor. At home, it's on wireless. And I'll be getting a couple of the tbolt adapters, but I really don't use it that often.

  162. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    just because you don't have the eyes for it, but I have 20/10 and 20/15 eyes, and even normal retina display is not good enough for me. I need something in the 400 dpi range before I don't see the dots, at 12" - 18" from the monitor.

    And yes, my terminal.app runs at 6 point fontsize.

  163. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    You really haven't been to ebay recently, have you? Recently like in the past 15 years or so?

    I've never seen a 3 year old mac sell for $50. Unless it's broken.

  164. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Mitreya · · Score: 1

    I'm working on a Dell right now that has a 1366x768 display. It's 15.4".

    Hear, Hear!!
    That is very sad. And you know how many laptops in the 13.3-14" range are manufactured with better than 1366x768 resolution? Maybe 3 or 4 choices altogether, including the relatively high end ones.
    When I did my research, I learned that HP Envy 14" model had advertised but (at the time, anyway) failed to deliver a higher-resolution screen and I saw many a post wondering when and how to get it.
    Why is it so hard?

  165. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 millimeters extra space = more ports, for no weight.
    (why do you *have* to make it heavier if it is thicker??)

    if anything; it will reduce costs significantly because you don't have to custom build *every* part.

    So the equation is More ports = thinner, weight is NOT coupled to thickness, and 2 mm is not going to break the thin'ness of the laptop.

    (Though; it does stop you saying "as thin as macbook air", so your marketing suffers)

  166. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First -- yes, other makes are bulkier, but there's no risk of misplacing or forgetting the other 15 dongle's worth of notebook.

    It's like criticizing certain multitools for being bulkier than separate tools doing the same job (most multitools are actually a win here, because of sharing the "handle" amongst all tools, but there's exceptions) -- some people would rather have one piece they drop in their pocket and have everything, some people would rather split it up if it saves them weight or bulk.

    Second, that's a silly comparison. The dongle is not saving most of that size/weight, because Apple machines with ethernet have also been thinner than other machines.

  167. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    springloaded pop-out RJ45 jack that is a rigid frame with 8 electrical connector pins

    I had one of those, and it broke very easily. I'd hope Apple would use something better than the cheap plastic my port had, but it's probably still an easy-to-break item.

  168. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Then buy a Dell or Thinkpad.

    They have an OSX option? No? Didn't think so. I have a macbook pro and for the most part i like it. I use the ethernet port pretty regularly for all sorts of things. Its not exactly a port i consider optional.

    Oops, except since those are 2-3x as thick as this new laptop, you'd have to carry 15 Ethernet dongles to match their thickness and weight.

    So I have to choose between running OSX and an ethernet port?

    Yes, that's a "joke".

  169. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

    What is your wireless router hooked to the modem with? Oh, thats right, ethernet. What connection will cheaply (~$200) support 48 simultaneous gigabit connections? Ethernet.

    Good luck getting your small business to invest in a mesh of Wifi APs capable of that throughput for that many users.

    I would also remark that if you dont have daily access to an ethernet port, you either dont have a job / go to school, or else are in the minority.

    None of that has any relevance for laptop users. And, every business I've dealt with in the last 10 years has had WiFi throughout their offices.

  170. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by keefus_a · · Score: 1

    So, serious question here. Was the old Macbook Pro too thick? It seems like it's not really going to make an appreciable difference unless you really need space for one more magazine in your bag.

  171. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, you just summed up the attitudes of Apple users everywhere

    IM THE ONLY ONE WHO MATTERS.

    Non-Apple users' opinions do not matter to Apple. Why should they? If you're not their customer and aren't going to become one, you're irrelevant.

    This is true of every business, including whatever PC passes your furious anonymous trolling.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  172. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'm still shocked and angry that MBPs don't come with 56k modems! What if there's no wifi OR ethernet?! Then what are you going to do!?

    Also what about the printer port man? What if I need to print something and there are only dot matrix printers?! What will I do?!

    It'll be a disaster and it'll all be APPLE's fault!

  173. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just effectively admitted that Apple lovers are motivated by emotions instead of a rational judgement.

    Actually, I'm pretty sure GP just "admitted" that the best way to respond to dumb trolling is to mock it.

    If it were the latter, then being autistic would not prevent you from liking Apple products.

    You pretend that autism makes the sufferer's logic infallible. It doesn't. Autism doesn't make people into emotionless hyper-logical robots. It makes them into people who find it very difficult to learn and react to a wide variety of social cues, as well as a grab bag of other problems.

    Also, even when we are thinking perfectly logically, a chain of valid logic is only as good as the premises which are its inputs. Autists are just as vulnerable to the problem of false premises as anybody else. Possibly more so -- we tend to miss important things which other people would notice immediately, and we also tend to obsess over unimportant things. Both of these inject a steady stream of false premises into our thinking. And many of us are prone to falling into "cycles" where we think through the same chain of logic over and over, which often keeps us from seeing the bigger picture.

  174. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by cheetah · · Score: 1

    The Thunderbolt to GigE adapter is $29 on the store right now.

    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD463ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA3Ng

  175. 10,000 feet? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    This page lists the maximum operating altitude of the new MBPs as 10,000 feet. Does that mean you can't use them on airplanes? That seems silly... The only moving parts on there should be fans, right? No hard drive to crash. So why such a low service ceiling?

    1. Re:10,000 feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, just maybe, they mean the atmospheric pressure equivalent of 10,000 feet? Which an airplane is not at - cabin pressure is approx. equivalent to 8,000 feet, or more like 6,000 feet on the 787.

    2. Re:10,000 feet? by voidptr · · Score: 4, Informative

      The cabin pressure of a typical commercial flight is 8,000 ft or below, even though you're at 35,000. So it'll work just fine.

      10,000 just seems to be the standard everyone who isn't making ruggedized parts bothers to test to. I doubt it'd fail catastrophically at 10,001 or even 15,000.

      --
      This .sig for unofficial government use only. Official use subject to $500 fine.
    3. Re:10,000 feet? by thoughtspace · · Score: 1

      That might be 10000ft un-pressurised.

    4. Re:10,000 feet? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Humor?

      Or did you want them to specify the atmospheric pressure they are rated for?

    5. Re:10,000 feet? by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the low service ceiling, but commercial aircraft are pressured to an equivalent of approximately 8,000 feet so it's not a problem. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they were related: that the machines were only actually tested and certified on board pressurized aircraft, not by hiking them up a mountain.

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    6. Re:10,000 feet? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that you could still use them on an airplane because the cabin is pressurized.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    7. Re:10,000 feet? by Ed_1024 · · Score: 1

      The 10,000' pressure altitude limitation is probably due to heat dissipation (or the lack of it). As you reduce the density, the mass of cooling air going through the device goes down.

      This is a major problem with equipment in an unpressurised environment, especially when you get down to vacuum levels. People have this idea that space is incredibly cold but a lot of the engineering difficulty is getting heat out of components when they can only radiate excess energy, not convect it away.

    8. Re:10,000 feet? by ArtDecayed · · Score: 1

      Having just returned from climbing Mt. Everest, I can attest that my MacBook Air (2011 model) worked perfectly fine at base-camp, which at 5400 metres, is over 17,700 feet. They are simply certified as working to 10,000 feet as most users are unlikely to go any higher. As it is, I suspect that this is a redundant limitation as it only really applies to computers with HD's - the lower air pressure at higher altitudes causes the disk heads to crash (they rely on air to float above the spinning disk platter) whereas this obviously doesn't apply for an SSD.

      --


      'The best thing about deadlines is the wonderful WHOOSHing sound they make as they go by.' - Douglas Adams
    9. Re:10,000 feet? by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Probably because they're using lithium polymer pouch cells for the battery and they don't want them to swell.

    10. Re:10,000 feet? by rhook · · Score: 1

      What effect does altitude have on capacitors? I have a feeling that they will burst when in use above a certain altitude.

  176. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    If I didn't bring mine, or forgot it, or lost it. Then I'm pretty much fucked.

    Simple solution: Glue the dongle into your laptop. Now it is "built-in" and you don't have to worry about it anymore.

  177. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Unless you are buying a classic, a car is not an investment either.

  178. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    You do understand that the purpose of a laptop is to be portable, right? Adding a keyboard, mouse, and separate monitor makes it a lot less portable. That's as asinine as saying for the price of a laptop you can get a much powerful desktop that weighs only 10x as much.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  179. Diablo III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, 339 posts and no mention that Blizzard will make Diablo III "retina-capable"?

  180. 72 DPI graphics by lilfields · · Score: 1

    Since most web graphics are 72DPI, does anyone have any comment on how they look on the new 200DPI screens? Is this a non-issue or is every website going to have to transform everything to 200DPI, which is generally seen in magazine print.

    1. Re:72 DPI graphics by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      It will not affect the websites (nor existing apps, for that matter). Just like iPhone 4 or iPad 3 didn't affect them, even though both had doubled their resolution compared to previous versions.

    2. Re:72 DPI graphics by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      They will probably appear to be more blurry, as they will most likely need to be scaled.

  181. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

    Remember, the common image of the Apple user is of the screenplay writer sitting at Starbucks. Ethernet does no good in that scenario.

    Well of course. What's the point of buying a Mac if no one sees that shinny apple on that back? :P

    --
    Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
  182. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Why are you so completely obsessed with what others buy? Counting your posts in this thread, I'd clearly call that "obsession". What business is it of yours?

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  183. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After 3 years, a laptop's value has plummeted to roughly $50, and it makes little difference whether its a mac or not.

    Bolded statement is false. Mac laptops hold their resale value far better than PC laptops. Here's a >4 year old Core 2 Duo MacBook Air which (a) has been bid on, so this isn't just a fantasy price, and (b) is currently going for $480:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-MacBook-Air-13-3-Laptop-January-2008-Customized-/290723320805

    They make pretty terrible investments.

    Well, duh. Nobody sane treats either a luxury car or a laptop as an "investment". Investments gain value over time. 99.999% of cars and laptops do not; the only exceptions I can think of are super-rare exotic cars for which there is no equivalent in the laptop world.

    The question is, how fast does your car or laptop lose value in the resale market? And the truth is, MacBooks don't lose value as fast as Dells or HPs. If you upgrade MacBooks at ~1-2 year intervals you can sell your old machines for a shockingly high percentage of the original price, especially if you take good care of them. If you space your purchases out more, you'll still get non-trivial amounts of money back.

  184. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    There's this concept of a "mobile workstation", which is a device that is portable, but doesn't compromise so much as to impede features that are actually important to one's work. MacBook Pro was such a thing. Not anymore.

  185. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    You can see more stuff on your screen at once. You won't have to scroll as frequently.

    Not if you keep using OS X on this. Remember that they've chosen the 2x resolution specifically so that they could keep all UI elements at the same physical size, just use more pixels drawing them (for sharper text and curves).

  186. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then buy a boss $500 screen, keyboard, and mouse, and get some real work done,

    How is that screen keyboard and mouse going to work when I'm at the airport or on an airplane?

  187. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I dont get the drooling over Retina Display. Unless you are a graphics professional, i just dont see the use-case for it.

    Ultra-sharp text everywhere without blurry antialiasing. I'd pay $2K for that.

  188. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    You probably need to see a retina display alongside a standard one to appreciate it.

    It certainly makes more sense than HDTV does.

    Are you telling that going from 720x480 to 1920x1080 (6x the pixels) makes a smaller difference than going from 1680x1050 to 2880x1800 (2.93x the pixels)?
    Especially since TVs are much larger, the increase in number of pixels make much more sense.

  189. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Thunderbolt? Did I miss something? Is a USB dongle which you can buy new for $30 not fast enough?

    For me it's not an issue of speed, it's an issue of me not wanting to use up a USB port for it. The only thing for me that really eases the pain of the lack of ethernet is that they have TWO thunderbolt ports, I can use one of those for the ethernet instead.

    When the Thunderbolt adapters appear, there will likely not be any for Ethernet, more likely Thunderbolt--> 2x superspeed USB3.... it's a 10Gigabyte/s connection... you'd be thick to waste it on an adapter that relegated it to a gigabit connection. Want more USB3? 2 Thunderbolt ports would provide 4 more at full speed.

  190. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by tyrione · · Score: 1

    The physical parts may cost less to put the NIC on the motherboard, but in something as space-tight as the MacBook Pro, the space savings probably outweigh it.

    This is where Ivy's design pisses me off. The previous revision was think enough and light enough an 8 year could carry around and not whine about the weight. To scale it down even more is nothing more than bragging rights in the form of mental masturbation. I don't give 2 shits that this laptop got thinner. It was already thin enough without compromising on GPGPU options. They couldn't put in high end options because of heat dissipation issues, but Ivy got his razor thin look. Wee ha!

  191. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Thinner => Lighter / Smaller => More portable

    Seems like a reasonable thing to want in a laptop. If I wanted a machine that did everything at any cost.. I'd get a desktop.

    Lift a dumbell larger than 10lbs. Do it routinely and you'll discover the previous version of the Macbook Pro was highly portable. They have now reached their theoretical thin limits and it's a waste of time.

  192. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    That's why I lug around a 17 inch MacBook Pro. Good for the cardiovestubular system as well.

    When you lightweights fall over due to heart failure because you've never picked up anything heavier than an latte and a MacBook Air I'm gonna run you over in my wheelchair.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  193. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Ethernet is ubiquitous!

    What? That's patently absurd. It may be available at the office or at home, but anywhere else you're at least as likely to have wireless, and in many, many places, it's your only option.

    The hotel I stayed at last week only had wireless.

    The restaurants I ate at had only wireless.

    My local coffee shop only has wireless.

    Remember, the common image of the Apple user is of the screenplay writer sitting at Starbucks. Ethernet does no good in that scenario.

    Most work on a laptop is done at work or at a home office, not sipping overpriced coffee chatting with friends remotely at some other coffee shop while you look cute around a bunch of strangers in the coffee shop you currently occupy. It was a bad design trade off that cut off GigE and better GPGPU options. Ivy needs to be reigned in.

  194. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    $30 for Thunderbolt to Ethernet.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  195. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by catmistake · · Score: 1

    People are starting to think of laptops as fashion statements foremost, rather than as tools. It's fine to want good aesthetics (a good-looking laptop is nicer than a bad-looking one), but one should never give up functionality for the sole purpose of aesthetics.

    While I agree with you, it won't be long before this kind of powerhouse technology appears to us as no more than a pair of odd looking sunglasses. When that day comes, probably within the next 5-10 years, I will laugh at your stupid looking sunglasses/supercomputer that have put function over form.

  196. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by tyrione · · Score: 1

    I'll take an ethernet dongle and smile if it's attached to a 15.4" laptop with a 2880x1800 screen.

    I won't. I'd have bought one if they kept the former thickness, included upgrade options to AMD 7770M and 32GB of RAM with an HDD, instead of just a damn SSD drive only, not GigE and a heat dissipation ceiling limited Nvidia 650M.

  197. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by tyrione · · Score: 1

    WiFi isn't everywhere. But it's at a hell of a lot more places than ethernet. Last time I used ethernet was 2009.

    Are you saying that Laptop should be held up thickness wise, at the point where the body can accomodate an RJ45?

    The minority of people that are still ufing ethernet for laptops need to carry an ethernet cable with them anyway. It's no hardship to them to take a cable with a dongle in instead. Meanwhile the majority who use WiFi now get a better laptop.

    2009? Then you must not work for any Corporation in the Globe.

  198. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by iluvcapra · · Score: 2

    Hey, Lexus is over priced. And honestly...it really is just a Toyota. So why not just buy a Toyota and save that money?

    Seriously, you need to go out and do some test drives... Audi A4, Mercedes C250, BMW 328i (the new F30s are SWEEEEET even if they're everywhere), Lexus, Infiniti G25. Don't knock it until you've tried it.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  199. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then buy a Dell or Thinkpad.

    Yes how could you possibly question the infinite wisdom of Apple?! The flaw is in you, not in their products so go and buy something else.

  200. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by exomondo · · Score: 1

    I have a Macbook Air and I bought the USB-to-Ethernet dongle. I never used it.

    Just out of interest why would you buy something you don't have a use for?

  201. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by exomondo · · Score: 1

    Non-Apple users' opinions do not matter to Apple. Why should they?

    Because at some stage everyone was a non-Apple user...duh!

  202. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by DogDude · · Score: 1

    What does "more portable" mean? Either you can carry it, or you can't.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  203. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by catmistake · · Score: 1

    WiFi isn't everywhere. But it's at a hell of a lot more places than ethernet

    Unless you run Linux... what a pain it is these days to get legacy computers wireless on linux. I love Linux... just saying... the only problem ever have with wifi is in Linux world, trying to get drivers (if they can be found) to recognize the interface. In Linux world, Ethernet "just works."

  204. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Swampash · · Score: 1

    I didn't get the drooling over retina display until I actually used one.

  205. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Are you telling that going from 720x480 to 1920x1080 (6x the pixels) makes a smaller difference than going from 1680x1050 to 2880x1800 (2.93x the pixels)?

    No I said it made more sense. Sense is not measured in pixel deltas.

    People tend to watch TV from the other side of the room, and they're watching a car chase, or sport, or the news or something. Many people can't tell the difference at all from normal viewing distance. And even for those that can, little is lost on standard def vs HDTV. I don't even bother recording movies in HDTV on the PVR any more. I go for standard def as they use less disk space.

    With a laptop, you're working with text, and potentially smallish UI elements, from a much closer range. I've not seen the new MacBook yet, but going on the retina displays on the new iPad and iPhone, it makes a huge difference to clarity. Like printed text rather than the usual slightly blurry computer screen text we're used to.

  206. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that Laptop should be held up thickness wise, at the point where the body can accomodate an RJ45?

    Oh come on, this isnt a difficult engineering problem. You have a springloaded pop-out RJ45 jack that is a rigid frame with 8 electrical connector pins. Ive seen it done on older laptops. It doesnt need to be terribly thick (just thick enough for rigidity), and doesnt require a dongle.

    Just curious... do you regularly use a computer that still has a 1.44mb floppy disc drive? You are my hero. fight the progress!

    But seriously, Apple has always dropped technology that was still in common use, and introduced technology first that no one was yet using; their products are always in front of the bleeding edge and state-of-the-art. If all technology manufacturers were doing this, it would be a problem. But that isn't the case... it's only Apple. So it's not a big deal.

  207. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Sancho · · Score: 1

    I fully expected to use it. Turned out that I didn't need it (yet--maybe I will one day).

  208. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    You've got it all wrong. For a machead the style is the substance.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  209. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by arekin · · Score: 1

    Then buy a Dell or Thinkpad. Oops, except since those are 2-3x as thick as this new laptop, you'd have to carry 15 Ethernet dongles to match their thickness and weight.

    It's not for everybody, but don't pretend that it's a "joke"

    Sansung series 7 Chronos, Similar size as a Macbook pro, has an ethernet port. A laptop does not need to be thick to have an ethernet port. Someone's cutting corners to make their laptop cheaper and charge just as much as they ever did for the overpriced pos.

    --
    Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll.
  210. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similarly buy a Kia rather than a BMW when you buy a car.

    Mac laptops are a lot more like Toyotas, no-frills design, not overly high-performance but well built and very reliable.

  211. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

    Nope. $29 for the TB adapter. That's actually surprisingly cheap.

  212. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    A presenter must always be prepared, validate their ability to deliver BEFORE getting up to present, and supply backup.

    Truly spoken like someone who has never given a presentation. Here is a better platitude for the situation: whatever can go wrong will go wrong, and at the worst possible time.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  213. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I stand corrected. I think this is nuts, though. If you're going to adapt Thunderbolt to Ethernet, at the very least have it be able to daisy chain more Thunderbolt devices, or give it two Ethernet ports... or... 100. This is a silly accessory... but I guess it is for a specific mobile purpose.

  214. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    the common image of the Apple user is of the screenplay writer sitting at Starbucks

    That does not reflect reality. In fact, screenplay writers usually serve at Starbucks.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  215. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1, Informative

    and you don't have to worry about it anymore.

    Right, I just have to worry about breaking the dongle and possibly the port now.

    One of the things I like about my macbook pro (and that i actively look for in laptops) is that there is nothing sticking out of it to catch on things and break.

    A dongle sticking out of a usb port 24x7 is just begging to get completely wrecked.

  216. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Separate bag"? Your laptop bag doesn't have a pocket for extras such as a PSU? If you're carrying a PSU, an ethernet dongle isn't going to add much to size or weight. And what it does add is more than saved by the thinness and light-weight of the new MBP.

    Apple has launched the word's most advanced laptop today. Retina display, SSD, 7hours battery life, and so very thin. And you think it's a joke because its too thin to house a built in RJ45? How moronic is that?

  217. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Bertie · · Score: 1

    Right, but that 1600x1200 screen was 17" diameter, and there's nothing useful in that sort of size any more. I don't want to have to buy a monitor that big just to get the resolution I need. This thing is the answer to my prayers because it fits more vertical pixels than any other screen into an eminently portable package.

  218. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Fair enough. By volume, you still come out very far ahead with even a marginally thinner laptop. And this is a bit more than marginally thinner.

    I think most people, including myself, use laptop bags of some sort or another. This is just something to toss in - again, by weight and volume, you still come out better with a thinner laptop + dongle.

    I'm by no means a fanboi, but Apple has a funny habit of being about a year ahead of "obvious". They did it with floppy drives, serial ports, physical media with the Air, etc. I have a use for a laptop with a serial port (for embedded work), but I'm not about to pretend that a laptop without one plus a dongle isn't a big improvement. Ethernet is smaller than a serial port, but it's still thicker than they have room for. Even on my 2008 MBP, the GigE jack is only about 2mm shorter than the entire body. It's several mm larger than any other port, and when the entire laptop is less than 2cm, millimeters matter.

    It's a basic heuristic - "make the common case best". It applies to algorithms, software, and even hardware. If most people don't use Ethernet most of the time, don't include it. Same goes for the DVDRW drive, Firewire, DVI, and microphone ports - which people seem much less up in arms over.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  219. Holy crap! by fa2k · · Score: 2

    That laptop has more pixels than my dual monitor setup!

  220. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except... Apple does not make docking stations for their laptops.

  221. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because you don't have the eyes for it, but I have 20/10 and 20/15 eyes, and even normal retina display is not good enough for me. I need something in the 400 dpi range before I don't see the dots, at 12" - 18" from the monitor.

    And yes, my terminal.app runs at 6 point fontsize.

    pfft...I have 20/2 eyes, even your pathetic idea of a retina display is not enough for me!

  222. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    No, WiFi is ubiquitous. Ethernet is becoming a legacy connections

    Haha, is that an example of "thinking different"? WIFI is just a physical transport for Ethernet. Now, I would perceive it as a great limitation if I had no option to connect my tablet or other portable device to a wired network. Fortunately that is no problem with a USB dongle. Of course, Apple would never dream of leaving out the USB port. Oh wait...

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  223. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the top of the line, you're looking at $3750 not $2199.

  224. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Separate bag"?

    Yes.

    Your laptop bag doesn't have a pocket for extras such as a PSU?

    It does. But I often don't take my laptop bag everywhere. Its 20lbs of cables, adapters, and tools.

    Often, if I just need my laptop I just take my laptop. It even has a battery in it.

    Apple has launched the word's most advanced laptop today. Retina display, SSD, 7hours battery life, and so very thin.

    If I have to carry a 20lb laptop bag wherever I go for the laptop to connect to anything I'm likely to need, then why should I be excited that its super thin?

    Hey, They could have shaved another 1/2mm off if they left out the keyboard too...

    Thinking about it further... they already redid the magsafe adapter for the new laptop...they should have integrated the ethernet connection there, and then had the ethernet jack in the power brick. If you need a wired connection, having the psu plugged in isn't the end of the world.

    I've often thought it would be handy if the power brick doubled as a usb hub as well, given the dearth of ports.

  225. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Yert · · Score: 1

    The Series 7 weighs half a pound more and is .25" thicker than the MBP we're talking about. It also does not have a retina display, 2 Thunderbolt ports, or 256GB of SSD for primary storage.

    The Series 7 is $1,000 less and has about 45 minutes more battery life, a DVD-RW, a mini-HDMI port (in addition to the HDMI port), an additional USB port, and an Ethernet port.

    Most importantly to me, if there's a hardware issue, I can't simply walk in to my local Apple Store, put it on the counter, and say "fix it."

    What was the point you were trying to make, again?

    --
    Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
  226. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 1366x768 LED
    > 500GB HDD

    lol looks like somebody's stuck in the 00s

  227. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There may be individual adapters, but there's also Thunderbolt docks that have ethernet as one of an array of connection options. Here's one. So you're not really wasting a Thunderbolt part on ethernet for a home/work setup and the $30 USB option is likely the one you'd choose for traveling.

  228. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you saying that Laptop should be held up thickness wise, at the point where the body can accomodate an RJ45?

    Oh come on, this isnt a difficult engineering problem. You have a springloaded pop-out RJ45 jack that is a rigid frame with 8 electrical connector pins. Ive seen it done on older laptops. It doesnt need to be terribly thick (just thick enough for rigidity), and doesnt require a dongle.

    Moving parts = breaking parts. I'd rather have a dongle.

  229. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    If most people don't use Ethernet most of the time, don't include it.

    Half the offices I work in don't have wireless, and everyone plugs in their laptops. I'm skeptical that a signficant majority of people using macbook pro's at work are wireless.

    This isn't a toy / consumer device... this is the 'pro' tool.

    . I have a use for a laptop with a serial port (for embedded work), but I'm not about to pretend that a laptop without one plus a dongle isn't a big improvement.

    The cisco cables are still rj45 to serial too. I have one in my laptop bag, along with a usb-serial adapter.

    Ethernet is smaller than a serial port, but it's still thicker than they have room for.

    I don't at all object to the existence of a super thin laptop without ethernet. To me the joke is that one has to choose between high res screen -or- ethernet.

  230. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Apple's new line is about 20% thinner than that laptop, has a bigger screen, and weighs almost exactly the same despite the larger screen. Not to mention a substantially more powerful processor and a battery life of 7 hours. I don't know how long the battery life on that Samsung is, but they don't say it on the overview, features, or specs page. Oh I finally found it - the press release says 7.8hr, but I don't trust most manufacturer's stated battery life claims, though I meet or exceed Apple's

    It's not the laptop for me, mostly because I have a home-built desktop running Linux for anything requiring computational power and I can't justify even half of the expense. But it's not worth pretending that it's not a very very good laptop.

    Though that Samsung one does look nice.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  231. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Guy+Harris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, saving that few grams and the 0.1mm savings in profile height

    Retina MBP: 2.02kg, 1.8cm. Non-Retina 15: MBP: 2.56kg, 2.41cm. Perhaps 540g is "a few" to you, but 2410-1800 != 0.1.

    Apple fanbois: lack of a feature is a feature!

    Rational people: lack of a feature that some particular person doesn't use much, in exchange for something they deem an improvement in other matters, is a net feature - e.g., the lighter weight might, for some people, reduce annoyance enough to more than compensate for what annoyance comes from the lack of an Ethernet port.

    Now, some other person might use the Ethernet port all the time, and not care as much about the weight. They should, err, umm, buy the other model of MBP.

    (But, hey, "some people might quite rationally find A better than B, and others might quite rationally find B better than A" isn't nearly as much fun as hotly and loudly arguing the total rulitude of {A, B} and the total suckitude of {B, A}....)

  232. asymmetrical fan blade by itchybrain · · Score: 2

    The new retina display macbook pro also has an asymmetrical fan blade to cut down on noise. You can check out the video for yourself if you wish at the Apple website. Thought I would highlight this to the community.

  233. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    There's this concept of a "mobile workstation", which is a device that is portable, but doesn't compromise so much as to impede features that are actually important to one's work. MacBook Pro was such a thing. Not anymore.

    Which features that are actually important to your work are missing from the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pros?

    Also, note that "one", the fact that it's spelled and pronounced the same as the cardinality of a singleton set nonwithstanding, can have more than, err, umm, one referent. Not all "one"s work necessarily match your/em. work.)

  234. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I'll take an ethernet dongle and smile if it's attached to a 15.4" laptop with a 2880x1800 screen.

    I would kick myself for spending over a thousand dollars for a latop without an ethernet port, whatever the screen size or resolution. I will tolerate the inconvenience in a tablet or phone where the RJ45 will not physically fit but not in a laptop.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  235. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I dont get the drooling over Retina Display. Unless you are a graphics professional, i just dont see the use-case for it.

    The point of the Retina Display is, it was a way for Tim Cook to come up with a differentiating feature for the ipad 3 without possessing an ounce of creativity. Maybe next time he will manage to come up with something that doesn't require twice the power draw.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  236. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    I have a Macbook Air and I bought the USB-to-Ethernet dongle. I never used it.

    Just out of interest why would you buy something you don't have a use for?

    "I never used it" != "I knew I had no use for it when I bought it". Perhaps he thought he might need it and wanted to make sure he had one on hand if he needed one Right Now, and later discovered that, in practice, that never happened.

  237. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, you just summed up the attitudes of Apple users everywhere

    IM THE ONLY ONE WHO MATTERS.

    He also summed up the attitudes of the people who think that its a Horrible Error to offer laptops without Ethernet - "I use it every day, it's insane to leave it out!"

  238. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

    Maybe he listened to one of the other posters and thought that he would need one.

    --
    un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
  239. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by exomondo · · Score: 1

    They also depreciate less than - and are a bit more expensive than their similarly-configured - korean-made rivals. It's more of a Hyundai/Kia Vs Toyota, then you've got Alienware which is the kind of the HSV GTS, a bit ridiculous, probably not the best workmanship but certainly high performance.

  240. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    No, you have to choose between the spiffy new thin MBP, or the newly revised regular MBP that still has an ethernet port and optical drive for people like you who insist that everything they need is inside the aluminum body.

  241. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    This Cinema HD display I'm looking at right now is 2560 * 1600.

  242. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can hear the difference with Monster cables too can't you!

  243. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    What does "more portable" mean? Either you can carry it, or you can't.

    The size and weight are a factor in moving it around. That's a strange factor for a seemingly educated person to ignore.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  244. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    You just effectively admitted that Apple lovers are motivated by emotions instead of a rational judgement.

    The dude said that it's not a one-size-fits-all solution and your response was effectively "you're a fanboy". Are you really sure you want to claim he's the one not being rational?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  245. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    You have a springloaded pop-out RJ45 jack that is a rigid frame with 8 electrical connector pins.

    Uh, yeah, I've worked with those and I'd rather just have the thunderbolt adapter, please.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  246. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading text is actually the best use case for it and everybody does it. Go use a new iPad for an hour, you will appreciate it. Crisp text literally relaxes my eyes and brain when I read for any period of time. I prefer to surf the web on my ipad rather than my laptop right now because of it.

  247. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    But I often don't take my laptop bag everywhere. Its 20lbs of cables, adapters, and tools.

    Sounds like your problem is with your existing kit.

  248. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that separate bag of parts include a power adaptor?

    Cause, man. That'd be so unfair.

  249. Come on by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I travel all the time. I have not been to a hotel with a working ethernet port in years, the ones that do had no cable.

    If you're at a friends house why would you not just use the wi-fi?

    There are very few uses for wired internet anymore, most of them involve very large files... it's simply not a hardship to use or carry a dongle for the VERY rare occasion you might need one.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  250. Usually they do by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Those rooms have projectors with cables already set up. They don't typically have apple convertor dongles.

    Lots of conferences I have been to have Apple converters on all the projectors, because most speakers these days use MacBooks with display port.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  251. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

    Truly spoken like someone who has never given a presentation. Here is a better platitude for the situation: whatever can go wrong will go wrong, and at the worst possible time.

    And that was spoken like someone who's computer is a cheap linux PC.

  252. Nope, more stuff by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I can have smaller text on a high-resolution display. So you really can get more content in the same space.

    To me pixels are more important than space (to a point).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nope, more stuff by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can have smaller text on a high-resolution display. So you really can get more content in the same space.

      So, what's the OS X setting to uniformly make text smaller in all apps?

    2. Re:Nope, more stuff by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Nope, more stuff by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The same place it exists in Windows.

    4. Re:Nope, more stuff by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried using that? It breaks even the OS itself, like some items in the main menu.

    5. Re:Nope, more stuff by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I tried looking for Control Panel -> Appearance and Personalization -> Display -> Make text and other items larger or smaller on my Macbook Air, but I couldn't find them anywhere.

  253. 17" not going away by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    17" is still a really useful size.

    Also it's not like it's that odd it did not see an update today, the last round of updates for the 17" was a number of months behind the 15" updates.

    They just don't want to create any confusion about what people should buy now...

    The 17" adds more than bulk. The larger frame also allows for better battery life, and could even offer some kind of additional port (though the 15" is doing really well port-wise).

    I think in six months or so we'll know if the 17" is going away or not.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:17" not going away by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's certainly gone away, for now. It's no longer on the Apple Store website.

    2. Re:17" not going away by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that before, but now that you point that out it lends a lot more weight to the notion they will not update it..

      I guess possibly they have decided that is a good enough size with that many pixels.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  254. Developer Conference by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why just update the laptops and not the desktops?

    Because almost all the developers use laptops and not desktops.

    This was a more targeted set of updates around things that mattered most to developers. It's also why we saw no new iPhone hardware, that's a more general announcement.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  255. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    A $2200 laptop where I have to carry around a separate bag of "parts" to restore the functionality that every other laptop has built in is a joke. The display adapters situation was bad enough.

    Roughly 10 years ago it was PC laptop users lugging around Ethernet adapters, either as a PCMIA card with bulging port housing that you couldn't safely leave in when in a carry bag, or a card that could remain in the laptop but came with a flimsy adapter cable. And many of these PCMIA cards cost more than $30 back then.

    Meanwhile, Apple started including Ethernet ports on its laptops in 1994, almost 20 years ago.

    So while I agree carrying dongles is a pain, I find it ironic and hilarious that people criticize Apple for requiring them (and specifically for Ethernet), since this is traditionally a hallmark of the PC laptop world.

    And unlike Apple, which today has functional reasons for excluding ports (thinness/compactness of the Air and MBP Retina), PC laptop makers back then had no excuse for excluding Ethernet ports so late in the game, other than saving a few dollars per unit.

  256. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    It's the in thing nowadays. BYO hardware.

    Where I work though, this would be a major pain in the ass. Wireless LAN is next to nonexistent, and is an epic challenge to set up on a mac even where it is available nasty Cisco WPA2 Enterprise setup with enterprise PKI and stuff) thanks to health information protection regulation.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  257. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    And by doing so you waste space on the motherboard on a single-function port, instead of a multi-function port (Thunderbolt). And then people criticize Apple for introducing a "proprietary" port (unless you're referring to some multi-function, 8-pin standard that doesn't seem to have been very common).

    In fact if you look at the ports on the MBP-Retina, other than SD and HDMI all ports are multi-function, even the audio in/out jack, allowing more space savings.

  258. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by timeOday · · Score: 1

    This Cinema HD display I'm looking at right now is 2560 * 1600.

    Which, case in point, Apple stopped selling a few years ago in favor of the smaller, lower-res 2560x1440 27" model.

    Either way, neither seems so hot compared to a 2880 x 1800 display... on a laptop!

  259. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

    A laptop with a screen like that is almost required if you're running an IDE without a large external monitor (as in developing while away from the office).

    Somebody PLEASE mod this guy up.

    I'm a "software development supervisor", which means I'm both a developer and in charge of a small team of other developers. I just recently specced out some new laptops for my group and screen resolution was one of the most important criteria from EVERYONE (second to RAM; but above processor and graphics).

    My team does most of the work in the office, attached to large external monitors (I also just upgraded those (except my own - I've already got an Apple Cinema Display)); but we do from time to time travel around a bit, and as such, screen real-estate on the laptops themselves is extremely important to let us actually do our jobs well.

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  260. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    WTF! I didn't believe you so I went to Lenovo's site to get a fast example do rebut you. And they are all gone! All the beautiful X series units with high res panels are all gone. 1366x768 everywhere and no upgrade options. I pray mine doesn't break because I really wouldn't enjoy settling for the rubbish they are selling right now.

    Guys, are you still selling Thinkpads or just generic Chinese crap? I won't pay Thinkpad prices for Acer specs.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  261. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by DogDude · · Score: 1

    The size and weight are a factor in moving it around.

    We're talking about modern laptops, right?. They range in weight from a few pounds up to about 10. Size and weight don't really factor in to this situation, as all non-handicapped, healthy human adults should be able to move a 10 lb item with the same ease of a 4-5 lb item. A 10 lb item is not "less portable" than a lighter item.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  262. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what she said. Let's hope she wasn't full of shit.

  263. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem saying they're both irrational. You too -- I defy you to define yourself as a ratio of integers!

  264. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Truly spoken like someone who has never given a presentation. Here is a better platitude for the situation: whatever can go wrong will go wrong, and at the worst possible time.

    And that was spoken like someone who's computer is a cheap linux PC.

    And that was spoken like someone who couldn't think of a retort. At least you Apple cultists keep me entertained, carry on.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  265. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, Apple started including Ethernet ports on its laptops in 1994, almost 20 years ago.

    "Roughly 10"...is more like 14-15. Almost 20? What is that actually? 18? That 10 year spread between 10 and 20 is more like 3-4 years tops.

    You are right that there was a few years 95/96/97 where a lot of laptops didn't have it -- but the low end consumers really didn't need it - most were still on dialup and that was it. And the busienss oriented stuff had it in the docking station.

    It was only actually an issue when laptops purchased in 95-97 were still being used in 98-02, and those were the people with the add-ons. The PC manufacturerers didn't really drag there heels that badly at all -- consumer/home laptops didn't really need ethernet until they got broadband at home. And much of the US still doesn't even have access to that yet, now, in 2012.

    And the state of networking 20 years ago ... 1992? Ethernet was pretty highend enterprise stuff and odds were if you had access to it, it was just in one place, and you had a docking station there. Even my hacker heaven home network ... in 1992... was still using coax cable and terminators. Remember what an ethernet hub cost back then?

  266. no serial port ? by cobbaut · · Score: 1

    ...an all new macbook pro and it still lacks a DE9 serial port ? ;-)

    --
    European Linux user, living in Antwerp
  267. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    That was spoken like someone who can't admit he's been beaten.

  268. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Xest · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth I have a Dell sitting around somewhere that's 15.4" and 1900x1200, so you didn't even have to go up to 17" for that previously.

    I've not looked at the market in a while, presumably it's not improved and getting a 15" laptop with anything close to this resolution is still now impossible giving the appearance that the technology magically doesn't exist to squeeze this many pixels onto a laptop screen even though we used to have it?

  269. 1680 x 1050? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    So where's the 'retina' display or the 1680x1050 resolution? I'd love a super hi res display, but would like more work area than 1440 x 900.

    1. Re:1680 x 1050? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's closer than many might suspect. Acer has just announced their 1920 x 1200 tablet.

      http://www.tabletpcreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3353&news=acer+iconia+a700+ics+android+tablet

      Won't be long before this format migrates into laptops and monitors. Everybody with an opinion seems to hate 800 vertical, and half of those people work in the computer industry in one way or another. It's coming.

  270. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, I have a Fujtsu-Siemens Pa 1510, bought on sale in January 2007[1] (Just before the Vista release, they tried to get rid of XP machines, as Vista was "the future" *grin*). Still works today. Now the battery, yes, it's dead... Bought a new one for 75€ at Duracelldirect. Works fine again. Sure, it's only a few hours charge and not 7.

    Now, I agree that Mac laptops are good value if you buy high end, but plainly stating that PCs are crap and will "fall apart" or "need to be retrieved from the landfill", are greatly exaggerated. Mine has scratches on the lid, but that's about all one can say about it.

    The main problem with my laptop is the graphics chipset. No more ATI support and the open source drivers on Linux are so slow, it's a pain to run... Windows XP runs perfectly fine though (fully updated) and if I want to play the odd Halflife 2 or Portal session, it will work just fine.

    I must do something right with my laptops, most have long and happy productive lives (5 years++)... Don't get me started on my iBook G3 that only lasted 3 years and had a logic board failure, which was a known problem.... but of course, I found out only after warranty. *sigh*

    [1] It cost 795€ on sale, but back then there were no 500€ laptops and this was pretty much the lowest price-point you could get at the time.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  271. Where's the PC counterparts? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    When will we see a Thinkpad with a hi PPI display? I can't believe this display is news to anyone, especially other manufactures. When will we start seeing these displays in other laptops and even standalone LCD monitors?

    1. Re:Where's the PC counterparts? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If history is a gage, sometime next year. Apple most likely has cornered the supply. All their competitors will have to scramble to get their hands on similar parts and will likely only to offer limited quantities when ready. Apple under Cook as COO has mastered logistics and supply chain and very few geeks seem to care or acknowledge his contribution to Apple. Most just want "MOAR POWR" but don't realize what it takes to manufacture a few million units to get them MOAR POWR.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  272. more again in au by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    $35 AU, when it really should be at most $30.00

    Talk about greed. They make it, they dont buy it for $27 from a supplier.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  273. you need a mic port by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    How in hell can you use skype or facetime without a mic?

    mics are needed, take zero space.

    Its like those lame ass windows laptops with a built in camera, but no mic, yet include skype + other interchat software that requires a mic.

    Idiots.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  274. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

    > I would like to see how that sub-$500 laptop is doing after 4 years...my bet is you'd probably need to retrieve it from a landfill first.

    Get real.

    I have a 7 yr old *consumer* Dell laptop, it does the job for email, web browsing, and ssh.

    Look, I have no trouble with people being happy buying 'brand name' whatever. Unless you get a faulty item, if you take minimum care of your Apple / Thinkpad laptop, it will probably last you many years. Just don't delude yourself thinking that the same is also not true of a, say, consumer-level Dell laptop.

  275. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    I think the key to doing a mac vs pc comparison is not just to look at the technical specs, but also the form factor. For some people, apple's systems have a superior form factor. They tend to be small computers (exception Mac Pro).

    For me, the holy grail mac is a desktop Mac with real drive bays like a Mac Pro but with consumer intel processors and discrete graphics. I want a Mac to play games on and that I can upgrade. Apple doesn't make anything like that. A mac mini has a 2.5" drive bay so it's useless for my needs. I don't want 4 external hard drives on my desk. It ruins the point of a mac mini anyway. The only mac that can hold my iTunes collection and offer me an internal time machine backup disk is a Mac Pro. Thus I have to buy an expensive, outdated workstation. Even with the bump, the Mac Pro is running on a motherboard and design from 2010. It has last generation xeons on the old socket. Most vendors stopped selling workstations, and the ones that do have been selling them with lowend consumer CPUs often times. Apple still makes a somewhat unique, if dated, product. I'm stuck on a first gen mac pro waiting for an upgrade. I've ebay'd new xeons for it and bought a 5700 series radeon graphics card from apple for it. I've added drives and ram. It's been a great machine, but I was really hoping for an E5 and a modern radeon card. It just didn't happen. It IS possible to find a high end alternative to a Mac Pro such as a dell precision workstation or a alienware system that can compete with a mac pro on performance on price. Apple owns the laptop market on quality units, and they get props for the iMac even though the competition has started to heat up in the all in one space (no touch screens for apple), but they fail the lowend desktop and high end workstation race right now.

    People who think apple is always the top of the pack fail just as much as the people who think the case, battery life or other elements of an apple laptop are not worth extra money over a consumer toshiba or something.

    As for me, I have a tough decision to make on whether I can live with a computer that can house my iTunes collection or buying another antiquated mac pro.

  276. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Actually, it is. You're not factoring in 'carry time'.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  277. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


    Count me as someone that never gets that "Apple is overpriced you can get a cheaper laptop...blah...blah...blah" argument.

    Hey, Lexus is over priced. And honestly...it really is just a Toyota. So why not just buy a Toyota and save that money?

    In the metro in Paris is a big Ad campain for windows Laptops (don'T remember the brand, I guess it was Toshiba)

    They are "high end" lap tops, prices between 2400â and 3k â ... I for my part consider those new Macs pretty cheap.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  278. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    768?!! You're shitting me. I can't live without 1600x1200 or better. You are probably one of those people who maximizes every single fucking window aren't you?

    Well, other people know how to use a "window" or rather, multiple "windows", each showing enough data in the background while I work in the main "window".

  279. Re:When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be willing to bet that the imac and mac mini will be updated on the official release of mountain lion. The miniscule update the mac pro received yesterday likely means that we won't see that one update (or die) until the 2013 timeframe.

  280. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, Apple started including Ethernet ports on its laptops in 1994, almost 20 years ago.

    "Roughly 10"...is more like 14-15. Almost 20? What is that actually? 18? That 10 year spread between 10 and 20 is more like 3-4 years tops.

    I don't know exactly when Ethernet became standard on PC laptops, hence the "roughly." I do know that when I started a job back in '03 they'd just bought a couple laptops that flat out didn't have RJ-45 ports and needed Ethernet PCMCIA cards. I don't remember brand or model (wasn't my responsibility), and they might not have been business-grade, but it's not like small businesses never buy consumer-level machines.

    On further research, as late as mid-2001 not all IBM Thinkpads came with Ethernet built-in, but had them as options (A20M, T21, T22). So the spread is at least 7 years on business-level laptops, and 9 years on all PC laptops if you accept my anecdote; I'm not going to look up every brand and model.

    You are right that there was a few years 95/96/97 where a lot of laptops didn't have it -- but the low end consumers really didn't need it - most were still on dialup and that was it. And the busienss oriented stuff had it in the docking station.

    In your earlier comment you wrote "It is about the availability of functionality when I need it. They won't have a dongle. If I didn't bring mine, or forgot it, or lost it. Then I'm pretty much fucked." So a docking station back then doesn't count. You're even less likely to lug that around than a network dongle/card.

    I'm not saying this isn't a minor shortcoming of the MB Air and MBP-Retina. I'm just amused at the irony of seasoned PC people criticizing Apple for requiring dongles.

  281. SSD? by Geeky · · Score: 1
    I know I'm coming to this late in the conversation (damn real life!) but the thing that would bother me most is the lack of a normal hard drive. SSDs are all well and good, but there are a lot of use cases that would hit the drive hard and I'd be concerned about the limits on the number of writes compared with normal drives.

    I assume that's part of the reason for the 8GB RAM as standard - to avoid swapping and maybe mount temp files in a memory based filesystem. Even so, the life of the drive is likely to be an issue, surely?

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  282. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    Apparently you don't understand how eyes work. That's fine. Go back and hide under your rock.

  283. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

    If you weren't such a complete asshole, maybe they would have treated you better. I've brought in two iPads for screen defects and I don't think I've spent 45 minutes either trip and I went in the middle of the day each time.

  284. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You make some good points. Nice to have some non-trolls on the thread at last. A couple of things:

    The only mac that can hold my iTunes collection and offer me an internal time machine backup disk is a Mac Pro.

    Internal time machine backup seems like a bad idea to me. When bad things happen is when you need a backup, and having the backup in the same box as the main drive seems to be inviting disaster in quite a lot of scenarios. I think WiFi is the perfect connection for Time Machine. It can be in a different room. And background backups don't have to be ultra fast. Nor does accessing music media files come to that.

    I must admit though that I compromise with a USB time machine drive that I plug in to my laptop from time to time.

  285. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Like Ford, who has Wifi in every building that matters?

  286. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your wireless router hooked to the modem with? Oh, thats right, ethernet.

    So a notebook needs an ethernet port build-in, because the wireless router it can connect to also has one. That has got to be one of the weirdest reason not to buy a specific Mac model yet.

  287. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Why dont you link the Mac you are referencing? Because the stock Macs listed on the apple website @ 1799 and 2199 do NOT come with 8GB RAM standard (its a several hundred dollar upgrade, or at least was 2 days ago), nor do they come with SSDs, and they have an inferior video card.

    You say youve proven what i said to be BS, but you havent even linked this Mac that youre talking about. Here, ill save you the effort and link direct to the bog-standard mac configs:
    http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MD103LL/A?
    $1799, with ONLY 4GB of ram, NO ssd, (only a 500GB 5400RP drive), and a core i7 (which until 2 days ago was a distinctly inferior Sandy Bridge)

    If you want that 8GB (which you claim to be standard), you need to go up to their $2100 model:
    http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MD104LL/A?
    Except that they STILL dont include an SSD: That costs an extra $900, despite the availability of MUCH cheaper 512GB SSDs out there...
    like the much esteemed Crucial M4 at only $414, which is once again 1/2 the price of the Mac hardware (despite it very likely being the same underlying hardware).

    For the things you claim to be standard (SSD, 8GB RAM, Ivy Bridge), you would need to shell out $3199, while I could get a comparable laptop at $1400 or less EASILY. By slapping an SSD into the lenovo, I would have that laptop for $1100.

    Compare to this other offering from MSI:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152349
    Which not only comes with 8GB RAM, a 50% bigger drive stock, and an identical processor, but also has a substantially beefier video card (GTX 660 / 2GB vs the MBP's 650GT / 1GB).

    Listen, you can argue that you get other benefits with the MBP like higher maximum ram (but even thats not true, I can easily find laptops with 16GB maximum) or a better resolution, but the more you try to tack onto the MBP the higher that markup will be. I will lay down a wager that ANY configuration of MBP you can come up with, I can match for 1/2 the price (except for screen resolution). Please dont bother disputing this unless you have a link to the Mac store to back your statements up.

  288. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, yeah, and the hotel I stayed at last summer only had ethernet. We're not complaining about that they included wifi, we are complaining about that they didn't include ethernet.

  289. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    You're not adding in the value of Win7: youre simply assuming OSX is more valuable, which isnt true to everyone. Myself, I think OSX has useful features and is cool, but I greatly prefer Win7 for a number of reasons. If we were to go by the vendor's own pricing, however, Win7 would be substantially more valuable at $150 vs the $30 for OSX. Not that that indicates anything at all, really.

    The argument that everything about OSX is better stems from ignorance. Ive seen my share of issues on OSX, and my share of crummy native apps (like Mac Mail, which throws up and dies if you have stuff in your outbox when the SMTP server is unavailable). Its a choice of preference and need; there are some apps which you would be stupid to buy on Windows because all the prime development happens for the Mac version; conversely if your life is SMB shares and Outlook youd probably be foolish to go spend all that money on a Mac because youre just going to be a second class citizen.

    And apparently not everyone DOES know that apple gouges on hardware, as evidenced by the poster above, and the fact that my post with links got modded troll while a responder with no links or evidence gets modded informative by the Mac Defenders Brigade.

  290. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    I generally agree; the thing is though, when friends come to me and ask "should I buy a mac", unless they really need that extra 1/2 inch shaved off the form factor, to my mind it would be bad of me to recommend paying twice as much for mostly the same specs.

    I think Ive recommended a Mac once or twice, but for most people unless they really want OSX and a slightly slimmer laptop with all custom parts, its just not worth it. Spend 1/2 as much and upgrade twice as often, if you really want the extra juice.

  291. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    The first system is very highly rated, and folks I know using that series of Lenovo are very happy with them.

    What about it makes it a turd, pray tell? The lack of the apple logo, or unibody?

    I note that you havent come up with any system that compares for less than double the price from the mac store. WHen i search for refurb'd 15" MBPs,
    (here), the cheapest machine there is a
    Refurbished MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Quad-core Intel i7
    4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm
    Intel HD Graphics 3000 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M

    All for $1350, all which is handly trounced by the linked, brand new, $799 laptop I linked.

  292. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure Word isnt included on a new MBP. And im pretty sure you can get Windows Live writer for free if you really want a free word processor, or any of the other free ones out there.

    As for burning software... its kind of been built into Windows since XP or earlier, with ISO burning built into Vista and above. Movie maker? Been free for ages. Photo software? Paint.net, which kicks the crap out of whatever is included with Mac.

    And what spreadsheet software is included with OSX, pray tell?

  293. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Link me a comparable MBP for less than double plz.

    Also, all of the MBPs come with 500GB drives (5400 rpm) by default.

    Finally,
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152337
    GTFO. 1TB drive, 1920x1080, 12GB RAM, GTX670.
    Comparable Macbook? ~$800 more, and cant match the RAM or video card.

    But Im sure there will be reasons youll find to argue with even that.

  294. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Incidentally, when you say "normally $1600", it is very common for them to inflate the "normal price". That laptop would never sell for $1600, because at that point its competing against things like this:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152337
    Which incidentally absolutely dominates any sub $2000 Macbook.

  295. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by cthulhu11 · · Score: 2

    They won't have a dongle

    It's $29. Buy them one and expense it.

    If I didn't bring mine, or forgot it, or lost it. Then I'm pretty much fucked.

    Same holds true for your laptop, no? If you didn't bring it to $office, or forgot it, or lost it, you're fucked. Chances are that this applies to your clothing too.

    But I often don't take my laptop bag everywhere. Its 20lbs of cables, adapters, and tools.

    And those cables, adapters, and tools are permanently attached to your "laptop bag", which I suspect is in fact more like a backpack or piece of luggage? Is there a gun to your head preventing you from having -- *gasp* -- a small/light case or sleeve that you carry your laptop around in when you don't need the kitchen sink? Like this one? http://shop.millscanvas.com/LaptopCarryall.html Or would that be too much like being a grownup?

    Often, if I just need my laptop I just take my laptop. It even has a battery in it.

    Lucky you.

    Apple has launched the word's most advanced laptop today. Retina display, SSD, 7hours battery life, and so very thin. If I have to carry a 20lb laptop bag wherever I go for the laptop to connect to anything I'm likely to need, then why should I be excited that its super thin?

    Unless you are compelled by some exotic religion to carry a bag made out of iridium, I highly doubt that a bag and Apple's adapter will add up to 20 lbs.

    Hey, They could have shaved another 1/2mm off if they left out the keyboard too...

    That is available for people whose needs it meets. It's called an iPad. People don't buy it then complain that it doesn't have a physical keyboard or a dozen 3.5" SAS disk bays.

    Thinking about it further... they already redid the magsafe adapter for the new laptop...they should have integrated the ethernet connection there, and then had the ethernet jack in the power brick

    Totally, because there have *never* been issues with running data millimeters away from power and transformers.

    If you need a wired connection, having the psu plugged in isn't the end of the world.

    I've often thought it would be handy if the power brick doubled as a usb hub as well, given the dearth of ports.

    Most USB devices have downstream ports, and the need for multiple ports conflicts with your obsession with not plugging anything into the laptop.

  296. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I bet you have a mirror over your bed in an earthquake zone.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  297. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    I find it odd that a midrange (between the Mini and the Pro models) system is being ignored by Apple. I've heard many complaints similar to yours. Heck, if they made a midrange I might buy one. They could probably pull it off in a form factor of a Mini x 3.
    Maybe the new bosses will add a midrange to the lineup.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  298. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    These young whippersnappers; only 4 years? Pashaw, us geezers are working on 6 year old models, though I did have to replace my function key once (don't drop textbooks on your keyboard, kiddies).

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  299. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Thinner => Lighter / Smaller => More portable

    Seems like a reasonable thing to want in a laptop. If I wanted a machine that did everything at any cost.. I'd get a desktop.

    Is Apple playing to your esthetic wishes, along with your desire to own and drive a Lamborghini? I am not an airline traveler, so weight is secondary for me and my Samsung Laptop. Since I can't afford a Lamborghini, owning an APPLE device is the next best thing.
    My laptop is not heavy, but because the case is in plastic, it is slightly heavier than an aluminum cased system.
    I code, watch movies, browse the net, respond to Slashdot comments, and enjoy the fact that it does all that I ask of a conventional laptop. Why, if it is stolen, I wont cry. It was less than a quarter of the price of the APPLE unit. And I touchtype and I believe that I cannot type faster on my device or the Apple.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  300. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by VMaN · · Score: 1

    Just because floppy drives seem archaic NOW doesn't automatically make that a good move at the time. They were a year or two too early in dropping the floppy drive, without replacing it with a practical (this is the important part) alternative.

    USB keys were expensive and low capacity(not that floppies were better on that front), and optical wasn't a drop in replacement.

    It just felt like a whole lot of form over function.

    (Note, I remember floppies fondly, but I'm not forgetting how horribly unreliable they where.)

  301. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    That sounds more like a problem with Linux than with wireless.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  302. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a network engineer and I use an MBA as my primary work computer. I keep multiples of the USB-to-Ethernet adapters in my bag. The small size of the MBA makes it excellent for standing-use in space-limited datacenter aisles, and the dongles let me have wired interfaces to test things. They're cheap enough that I leave one in the tool-bin at each datacenter site.

    The downside: 100mb max. Testing gig ports was impossible with the MBA in the datacenter. When back at the office I use the Thunderbolt display which was, until yesterday, the only way to have a 1G port on an MBA. Now that they've finally released the TB->1GbE adapters I'm going to give away all my old ones and upgrade to those instead. Finally, gigabit on the Air!

  303. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Korin43 · · Score: 1

    ... APPLE device ...

    ... APPLE unit ...

    Apple isn't an acronym.

    Also, you seem to be assuming Apple users are the only ones who are willing to trade features for a smaller laptop. This is not the case.

  304. Security implications of PowerNap by psydeshow · · Score: 1

    So I guess that when your laptop is asleep there is part of it that is still awake and talking to the mothership.

    1 - Does that mean we will have to put these in "airplane mode" when boarding a plane?
    2 - Does it only connect over known networks, or is it going to be constantly touching every public wi-fi ap it finds as you drive around town?
    3 - Does whatever OS is running during sleep have its own network stack that may be buggy or get out of date with regard to security certificates or DNS entries?
    4 - Can other processes besides PowerNap run during sleep like this? Is there a ceiling on resource usage to prevent a runaway process from draining the battery?

    I'm sure this is one of those things where details will emerge over time and with penetration testing, and I'm equally sure that paranoid folks like me will be able to turn it off. But I do worry that the average user won't have any idea that the changed nature of sleep and get into trouble because of it.

  305. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You probably just want to stop posting shit till you know what you are talking about. All the links to Apple that you provide are to the non-Retina display models.

    There are two retina display models. ($2199 & $2799). Both come with 8GB memory, configurable to 16GB. Both come with SSD (i.e. flash drives) as standard. And the more expensive one has 512GB in that SSD.

    http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs/

  306. retina display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    love the resolution (about time someone stopped pussing out) but.... what about response time, refresh rate, color accuracy, black / white levels, etc?

  307. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you actually have a job? If you think ethernet is dead I can only assume not.

    I've never worked anywhere, nor have I ever visited a client that doesn't still use ethernet, many of whom are fortune 100 companies.

    "Any more than they were put off by the removal of floppy disks, RS232, Centronics printer ports, and VGA."

    As MacBooks are still quite a rarity compared to the likes of Dell, HP, Lenovo, ASUS, I'd wager that's actually probably quite a lot. Apple's laptop division may well be profitable, but it's still a tiny fragment of the laptop market numerically, so each time an Apple fan says "Well, Apple doesn't have this but no one's put off by it" I chuckle a little. It's like the fanboys don't realise that even the likes of the iPhone, Apple's most profitable sector, still only hold a measily 15% - 20% global smartphone market share, that's only a few percent more than dying RIM.

    See here, Apple's computer market share doesn't even register on the global scale:

    http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/world.png?w=640

    So keep this in mind each time you use your "Obviously it doesn't matter because Apple is oh so popular...". Hint: It's not, Apple users are still, to this very day, an absolutely tiny, somewhat irrelevant minority in the computing world, and only slightly more relevant in the mobile world, where Android has at least a 3 fold numerical advantage.

  308. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    In your earlier comment you wrote "It is about the availability of functionality when I need it.

    Fair enough but the in the mid 90 the average user was unlikely to get access via ethernet.

    I do know that when I started a job back in '03 they'd just bought a couple laptops that flat out didn't have RJ-45 ports and needed Ethernet PCMCIA cards.

    I'm not going to deny that there were laptops available that didn't have them that late. The thing about PCs is that there are lots of options, including some terrible ones.

    I'm just amused at the irony of seasoned PC people criticizing Apple for requiring dongles.

    That's the difference right there "requiring".

    If you want a high resolution OSX laptop you get no ethernet. With PC, for better or for worse, there were tons of options, if you "required a dongle" after 1997 its because you didn't buy the right laptop.

    In 2012, if you want OSX you have to choose between a high resolution screen and ethernet. I have no issue with there being thin laptops with good screens and no ethernet for people who want that. But to not have a pro model with both features... even if its a bit thicker and heavier?

  309. Re:When will the imacs, mini and mac pro get usb 3 by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    iMacs are not desktops -- they're laptops with smaller keyboards and larger screens. At least component-wise.

  310. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    It's $29. Buy them one and expense it.

    Buy it where? Just step outside and the hot dog vendor has them? Or do I have to drive halfway accross town to the one place that has 2 left in stock... and that's this year. 2 years from now its a special order part from another state.

    Totally, because there have *never* been issues with running data millimeters away from power and transformers.

    Are you suggesting it can't work?

    Because Lenovo already made an ac adapter with a usb hub. One of the usb ports could eveb be used to charge a usb device without being plugged into the laptop. Great little item.

    Most USB devices have downstream ports, and the need for multiple ports conflicts with your obsession with not plugging anything into the laptop.

    a) Most usb devices do not have ports.
    b) I don't have an obsession with not plugging things into the laptop. I have an obsession with not plugging things into other things that then themselves plug into the laptop, and having to carry these other things around with me everywhere I go, when i should be able to just plug things directly into the laptop.

  311. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    It's $29. Buy them one and expense it.

    Buy it where? Just step outside and the hot dog vendor has them? Or do I have to drive halfway accross town to the one place that has 2 left in stock... and that's this year. 2 years from now its a special order part from another state.

    What bad thing would happen if you ordered it from http://www.apple.com/ like I did this morning? I strongly suspect that Earth's axis would not shift were that to transpire. Mine will be in my

    b) I don't have an obsession with not plugging things into the laptop. I have an obsession with not plugging things into other things that then themselves plug into the laptop, and having to carry these other things around with me everywhere I go, when i should be able to just plug things directly into the laptop.

    Do you *really* have a need to use wired ethernet *everywhere* you go? And those places number in the thousands? When I leave the house I somehow remember to put on underwear and shoes, and if I need to take my laptop, I generally remember to take that too. The dongle attached to it will be no different. I generally take the power cable/brick too, which neither curves my spine nor loses the war for the Allies.

  312. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BatGnat · · Score: 1

    I remember the days of old, running 640x480 on a 21" NEC Multisync just so we can see 24bit colour in Windows 3.1.......

  313. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by vux984 · · Score: 1

    What bad thing would happen if you ordered it from http://www.apple.com/ like I did this morning?

    If I forgot it or misplaced it it would be a significant inconvenience. If I show up at a tradeshow, it will be over before the replacement dongle arrives.

    The last time something like that happened to a coworker -- where he forgot some stupid video adapter dongle (mini-dvi is a pretty useless port to have on a laptop too), he ended up buying a new laptop, because at least he could get THAT the same afternoon, rather than wait 2 days for some special order rinky-dink dongle.

    Do you *really* have a need to use wired ethernet *everywhere* you go?

    No. If it was everywhere it would actually be easier to remember, albeit even stupider to have to carry around. But I move from client office to client office. Some have wifi, some don't. Sometimes the wifi is a more isolated "guest" network and I need wired to reach servers etc.

    Also "Internet Sharing" in OSX works really well. I often make my macbook pro into an access point for other wifi devices. And I regularly go the other way too... to connect a wired desktop to the mac via ethernet to get it on the wifi.

    I also use ethernet for large transfers and backups. Sure it works over wifi, but it works a LOT faster over the gigabit switch.

    So while I don't use ethernet on my laptop every day, I do use it regularly.

    When I leave the house I somehow remember to put on underwear and shoes, and if I need to take my laptop, I generally remember to take that too.

    I love this silly argument that you've made a couple times now. You are saying that because its easy to remember to put shoes on before you go somewhere its therefore easy to remember some small occasionally used dongle that one may or may not need. Do you REALLY think that this is a valid line of reasoning?

    I'm sure you've met countless people who have forgotten to bring something or other somewhere. Now compare that with how often someone has shown up naked having forgotten to get dressed.

    Maybe just maybe some things are much easier to remember than other things.

    and if I need to take my laptop, I generally remember to take that too. The dongle attached to it will be no different.

    Why would the dongle be attached to it when i'm packing up to leave? What if I haven't used it for 3 days and its still dangling off the ethernet cable at the office? Out of sight. Out of mind. Unlike the laptop itself... or my shoes.

    Don't bother pretending they are the same. They aren't.

  314. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by rhook · · Score: 1

    Thinking about it further... they already redid the magsafe adapter for the new laptop...they should have integrated the ethernet connection there, and then had the ethernet jack in the power brick.

    But then they wouldn't be able to sell you a $30 dongle that cost all of $2 to make.

  315. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by rhook · · Score: 1

    The wired connection you use at the hotel is by no means secure.

  316. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree to the point about second-hand value. I recently spilled water (well, beer actually, but that's not what my insurance company thinks) into my 2 year old 15" Macbook Pro, ruining it, and they told me that "lucky for you it was a Mac, because they deprecieate much less in value than PC's", and I actually got 75% of the cost of a new 15" MB Pro from them.

  317. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by klossner · · Score: 1

    Not, it's not. That dongle negotiates at most a 100 Mbps connection, which makes sense as it's USB 2.0 which maxes at 480 Mbps. The Thunderbolt dongle can handle a gigabit connection.

  318. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by klossner · · Score: 1

    Yes, sometimes you just have to use FAX. But it doesn't have to be on your phone. Consider a service such as efax.com or faxzero.com.

  319. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

    In computers you can always get half the functionality for 1/4 the price.

  320. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Oh I like that comment. I like it a lot. I may well steal it. erm... I mean quote you. :-)

  321. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by daisybelle · · Score: 1

    Well said. My first really portable laptop had an 'external optical drive'. I had the laptop for about 5 years, and I plugged it in about 15 times. Old tech.

    Although I must admit, when the wifi goes down, it has been great to just plug a cable in, to get access to the internet again to work out how to fix your wifi!

    --
    "You only get ONE LIFE." Richard Rahl, Faith of the Fallen - Terry Goodkind
  322. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea, get a 15" laptop sleeve and put the ethernet adapter in the sleeve with your laptop. It's not a separate bag and it doesn't make the laptop much heavier at all.

    You've picked a tiny issue to complain about when it really has a large number of practical solutions you could apply by very slightly adjusting your methods. Expecting a brand new device to immediately fit into your personal workflow is just ridiculous.

    That said, your idea with the power brick is very good. I wish they would do that.

  323. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it looks like you can't get the optical drive in any of them...

  324. Re:ethernet dongles (likely at added cost on $2k+) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thinking about it further... they already redid the magsafe adapter for the new laptop...they should have integrated the ethernet connection there, and then had the ethernet jack in the power brick. If you need a wired connection, having the psu plugged in isn't the end of the world.

    I've often thought it would be handy if the power brick doubled as a usb hub as well, given the dearth of ports.

    THIS
    THIS
    THIS
    and again
    THIS!!1

    my flatmate had a universal laptop charger with a built in USB port.
    having usb and ethernet in the brick just makes perfect sense, especially for apple.
    put a USB 2 hub in their with atleast 4 ports and an ethernet port.
    STEVE JOBS WOULD BE ROLLING IN HIS GRAVE.. this continued foobar is UNACCEPTABLE

    dunno where you get off claiming your laptop bag weighs '20lbs'... good luck it being more than 8lbs

    1 cable, isnt that what everyone wants?