Slashdot Mirror


Cat Parasite May Increase Risk of Suicide In Humans

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Maryland analyzing meticulous data collected by Danish authorities have identified a positive correlation between suicides among women with infection with the fairly common parasite T. gondii. Carriers were 53 percent more likely to commit suicide in a sample of 45,000 Danish women monitored for over a decade (researchers believe that the same correlation likely exists for men). Increased susceptibility to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder was also discovered. The physiological mechanism has not been determined, although some speculation centers around changes to dopamine levels. Two intriguing aspects were noted: 1) human infection often (but not always) begins by exposure to cats carrying the parasite, for example, by changing an infected animal's litter; and 2) the parasite spreads itself by infecting the nervous system of rodents, causing them to become suicidally attracted to feline odors which will increase the likelihood of their hosts being eaten by cats, whose digestive tracts provide the preferred environment for parasite reproduction."

252 comments

  1. Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Crazy cat women.

    1. Re:Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by macraig · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, I'm a crazy cat MAN, you insensitive chauvinist clod!

    2. Re:Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a Chauvinist... I just have standards.

    3. Re:Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by macraig · · Score: 1

      And I'm a standard cat fanatic, you clod!

    4. Re:Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by Artifex · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a crazy cat MAN, you insensitive chauvinist clod!

      Meow-meow feelings hurt.
      Meow-meow not nice.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:Are they sure it's not just "women with cats" by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a crazy cat MAN, you insensitive chauvinist clod!

      No problem. Would you like a sex change operation to make it easier to compete with the crazy cat women in your neighbourhood?

  2. So cats contract it by eating rodents... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but it's still okay to eat cats, right? I mean, as long as you avoid the digestive organs?

    1. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Make sure they're cooked to at least 160 F and you'll be fine.

    2. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but it's still okay to eat cats, right?

      The article is about human infections, so you might want to avoid eating humans. If you get infected, it will lower the dopamine level in your brain, and then you will get hungry for . . . another human brain . . .

      . . . I think I just figured out how the Zombie Apocalypse thing will start . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think I just figured out how the Zombie Apocalypse thing will start . . .

      will?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Alf, is that you?

    5. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by netik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wash your hands.

      If you are a cat owner, and you can't handle the simple fact that you are dealing with feces and vomit every day without a proper hygiene protocol, something has already gone wrong.

    6. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...but it's still okay to eat cats, right?

      I have actually eaten cat. Many years ago, I was in the red light district of Panama City (Fourth of July Street) with some fellow jarheads, and some guy had a "monkey" roasting on a spit. So we each bought a slice. We were eating as we walked along, and I noticed a young woman laughing at us. I asked her what was so funny.
      She smiled asked "Do you know what you are eating?"
      "Monkey meat."
      "Nope. It's an alley cat."
      Anyway, it tasted like chicken.

    7. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wash your hands.

      If you are a cat owner, and you can't handle the simple fact that you are dealing with feces and vomit every day without a proper hygiene protocol, something has already gone wrong.

      I've got cats and I don't handle their feces every day. I let my neighbourds do that when the cats go and crap in their rosebeds.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Just head to the deep south, you can travel entire counties without finding so much as a whole brain betwixt the entire population. Can't spread a disease without a vulnerable organ to house it. Just don't all come down all at once, it ruins the advantage.

      Rather links to this post

    9. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard you can get it from being bitten by a cat - mainly as they lick their butts and then bite your hand. So, just washing your hands after changing the kitty litter won't always help. Even washing a wound from a cat bite might be too late.

    10. Re:So cats contract it by eating rodents... by twosat · · Score: 1

      I have a cousin in Italy who says that he has eaten cat once, only he said it tasted like rabbit. It's said that people living in the mountains of northern Italy resorted to eating cats during wartime famines and some still have a taste for it. There's even an Italian saying that has a line that translates as "people from Vicenza eat cats". In any case, it's not a good idea to eat something that's so high up the food-chain.

  3. The chicken and egg problem all over again by pyzondar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do the crazy cat ladies have cats because they are crazy, or are they crazy because they have cats?

    1. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Either way this explains Caturday.

    2. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do the crazy cat ladies have cats because they are crazy, or are they crazy because they have cats?

      The parasite also causes decreased sexual inhibition. Translation: It makes women sluttier. No corresponding effect was found in men. Of course, this effect isn't as widely documented for obvious political reasons...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by sackbut · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do the crazy cat ladies have cats because they are crazy, or are they crazy because they have cats?

      The parasite also causes decreased sexual inhibition. Translation: It makes women sluttier. No corresponding effect was found in men. Of course, this effect isn't as widely documented for obvious political reasons...

      That is because in men there is no sexual inhibition to effect.

    4. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting the study (http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1206779) :
      "Stratifying by psychiatric history, we found that among women with a history of mental illness, [T gondii] seropositive women had a relative risk of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.94-1.66) compared with seronegative women, and among women without a history of mental illness, seropositive women had a relative risk of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.21-2.00) compared with seronegative women."

    5. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by toygeek · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    6. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you knew anything about these parasites, you would not write what you just did.

      Cats are carriers. Rodents are part of their life cycle. Rodents infected with these parasites tend to be "more brave", some even to the point of taunting a cat to attack them. The cat eats infected rodents, and the cycle of the parasite is complete as it returns to the soil and rodents pick it up once more.

      Humans are just unintended side show for the parasite, but since these affect behaviour in mice brains, it is not surprising these parasites affect human brains too.

      http://www.livescience.com/5631-zombie-ants-controlled-fungus.html

      Is another example of similar effects in non-mammals by other, yet similarly acting organisms.

      In a similar unrelated note, there are experiments that show even more bizarre behaviours, like effectively a "personality transplant" by a swap of gut bacteria cultures between two mice. One aggressive and another docile. Swap their gut cultures, and you swap their bahaviours!

      There is plenty of other research starting to appear in this area,
            http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110517110315.htm

      So basically, how you eat may tell what you are/may become and your becteria and viruses play bigger part in your life than you can image.

    7. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by couchslug · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Do the crazy cat ladies have cats because they are crazy, or are they crazy because they have cats?"

      Yes.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is because in men there is no sexual inhibition to effect.

      Sure there is. It's just that rather than being controlled by the brain, it's governed by an external organ known variously as a "wife," "girlfriend," or, in the case of Slashdotters, "mother."

    9. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 0

      If you RTFA you'd see:

      "Though the study focused on women, there's no reason to believe the results would be any different in men, according to Dr. Robert Yolken."
      "Other smaller studies have been carried out in both men and women, and they find the same thing," he said.
      "The No. 1 source is probably undercooked meat,"

      But hey, don't let information get in the way of your game of misogynist ping-pong.

      --
      This space available.
    10. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      affect, not effect.

    11. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it be possible in men?

    12. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by icebraining · · Score: 1

      How did you manage to read misogyny in parent's post? Do you consider having no sexual inhibitions to be a positive thing?

    13. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by ewieling · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you consider having no sexual inhibitions to be a positive thing?

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line. Reduce guilt about sex and you reduce religion's hold over the populace. We can't have that happening, now can we?

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    14. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 1

      This topic was covered in a segment of RadioLab a few years back.

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
    15. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Genda · · Score: 1

      The two things that make people crazy are sex and money. Start talking about either and stand back and watch the goofy unfurl./p?

    16. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by LordLimecat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line.

      Except for the whole book of Song of Solomon, you mean.

      But dont let your ignorance get in the way of your anti-religious sentiment, this is slashdot and theres karma to be had.

    17. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to the study in the article, the women are probably fine. I'm actually surprised this was published. An RR of at least 2.0 is necessary to indicate a cause and effect relationship, Studies with an RR > 3 are the ones that get published. The RR in the study is:
       

      Results T gondii–infected mothers had a relative risk of self-directed violence of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.27-1.85) compared with noninfected mothers, and the risk seemed to increase with increasing IgG antibody level. For violent suicide attempts, the relative risk was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.13-2.84) and for suicide, 2.05 (95% CI, 0.78-5.20). A similar association was found for repetition of self-directed violence, with a relative risk of 1.54 (95% CI, 0.98-2.39).

      They got 2.05 for suicide, which is just enough for them to secure funding for their next study.

    18. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there directions on how to infect my wife?

    19. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line. Reduce guilt about sex and you reduce religion's hold over the populace. We can't have that happening, now can we?

      Depends: do you consider the future portrayed by Brave New World good or bad?

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    20. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stupid sexy Flanders.

    21. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by wisty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: What do Slashdotters use for birth control?

      A: Their mothers!

    22. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      First off, the study only knew about diagnosed mental illnesses. Second off, what effect does economics have on this? What about things like iv drug use or nssi, things that can infect a person and are generally associated with a higher risk of suicide later on? I'm also doubting that those 2 things would show up on a persons medical record unless they where severe enough to require treatment.

    23. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by deimtee · · Score: 1

      I don't consider it to be the best future, but I do consider it to be far better than the future portrayed by 1984, which seems to be where society is heading.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    24. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by ghostdoc · · Score: 1

      Depends: do you consider the future portrayed by Brave New World good or bad?

      about 12% good, with some bad, also a modicum of mediocre, a little 'could do better' and a dash of awful.

      Life is a little more complicated than you're giving me options for...

      --
      Business/App ideas are like arseholes: everyone's got one, they're mostly shit, but very rarely they contain a diamond
    25. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by retchdog · · Score: 1

      what the fuck are you talking about? no statistic in and of itself indicates a "cause and effect" relationship. they indicate correlations only, which of course are sometimes suggestive.

      and why do you need RR > 3? what if there is a real cause and effect relationship which only increases the relative risk by 1.8? does it just never get published until, by freak chance, the sample happens to give an RR above 2? why don't you use p-value to determine existence of a relationship, and then, if significant, interpret the estimated RR as it is? this is how, oh, everyone else in the world does things.

      seriously, this rule, if true, implicitly rewards conducting repeated studies with artificially small sample size (to hopefully get RR>3 with a small p-value). i'm not saying you're lying, but what is the name of your field so i can assiduously avoid working in it? i don't think epidemiologists as a whole are this fucking stupid, so what is the name of the subfield?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    26. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by retchdog · · Score: 2

      before someone points it out, yes "increases the relative risk by 1.8" is totally wrong. i meant, "has an observed relative risk of 1.8."

      there are several well-established causal links with low RR. for example, very moderate alcohol consumption on oral cancer; the RR is ~1.5, but the p-value is near 0, and consuming more alcohol increases the RR. it's pretty convincing, but by your rule i guess since moderate alcohol consumption has RR below 2, alcohol doesn't have a causal effect until you have ~4 drinks a day, even though the RR has an obvious increasing trend with more alcohol consumed.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    27. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by azalin · · Score: 1

      But they do have their standards. Of course these standards usually vary by ones options, drunkenness and desperation.

    28. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by azalin · · Score: 1

      But hey, don't let information get in the way of your game of misogynist ping-pong.

      Well information and facts are always bothersome if they don't say what one would like them to say.
      Like:

      That is because in men there is no sexual inhibition to effect..

      which isn't exactly misogynist, but rather "man bashing". I wouldn't think of "will f**k everything not fast enough to run away" as a way to state man's superiority over women. But that's probably just me and that pest information that's getting in the way again.

    29. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Our ancestors were also (big) cat food.

    30. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by garaged · · Score: 1

      And we can see that from the underpopulation of this planet.... All those 80% or more religious people are reproducing so slowly....

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    31. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Nobody ever said that the general misogynist culture doesn't also effect MEN badly too, it does. Labels us as all potential rapists who just can't help ourselves, you know?

      --
      This space available.
    32. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The parasite also causes decreased sexual inhibition. Translation: It makes women sluttier.

      Suddenly 99% of the slashdot audience got interested.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line.

      Except for the whole book of Song of Solomon, you mean.

      But dont let your ignorance get in the way of your anti-religious sentiment, this is slashdot and theres karma to be had.

      Most Christians I've ever come across pretty much think sex is something two married people do to produce babies. Maybe you belong to a cool swingers cult or something, but the Song of Solomon is not generally the most read part of the Bible, and is often taken by Christians metaphorically anyway, i.e. as referring to God rather than sex.

      Anyway, most Catholics certainly equate sex with guilt, which is why they are such dirty fuckers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The two things that make people crazy are sex and money.

      And eating cat shit.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      But dont let your ignorance get in the way of your anti-religious sentiment, this is slashdot and theres karma to be had.

      Are you claiming that because the Song of Solomon exists, religions don't use guilt about sex as a mean to control people's behavior?

      It's either that, or you are rebutting a straw argument that is very different from the one the previous poster actually made.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    36. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The women are infected with the parasite. Are you arguing that their cat got the parasite from them then, instead of the other way around? (if so: how?)

    37. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line.

      So what do we, atheists, do to control ourselves? Do we bang everything that moves? I suspect there is about 0 sense in your statement.

    38. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not publish a rebuttal then?

    39. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually if it gets pretty bad it is diagnosed, and the mild cases are probably pretty common and we don't care about them.

    40. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by sustik · · Score: 1

      Humans are just unintended side show for the parasite, but since these affect behaviour in mice brains, it is not surprising these parasites affect human brains too.

      I admit that I did not read the paper. I wonder how they proved causation? Based on what I heard about the data I could only prove correlation. Maybe being suicidal will increase the probability of having cats?

      One experiment that could work (but I am no expert in this field) is to compare suicide rates between women with cats infected to women with cats not infected with the parasite. In general you want to eliminate all other factors than the one you want to prove about.

      Assume that would show that women with the parasite are more suicidal than women without the parasite (both groups equal in all other aspects). Then I would be tempted to conclude that the parasite causes the suicide tendency, since I do not know how being more suicidal would cause to be infected with the parasite. (Or wait a second...) Anyway is that sound scientific reasoning?

      And since we are on the topic. I am still trying to figure out how people brandishing umbrellas promotes cloud formation and rain... :-]

    41. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be an interesting study/survey to read juicy, unattributed segments out of the Song of Solomon, and see how many people (Ideally correlated to religious identity and/or church attendance) recognize it as being part of the Bible. For MAXIMUM TROLLING, identify the material as part of a book being proposed for addition to school curricula and get the respondents' reaction to this move.

      I am not a sociologist-any methodological failure in my proposal is to be expected.

    42. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      Do you know if this is a lifelong infection or if the parasites die in humans after a while?

    43. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parasite also causes decreased sexual inhibition. Translation: It makes women sluttier. No corresponding effect was found in men. Of course, this effect isn't as widely documented for obvious political reasons...

      Because only a deaf man could fuck a cat lady?

    44. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Most Christians I've ever come across pretty much think sex is something two married people do to produce babies. Maybe you belong to a cool swingers cult or something,

      Its not "my views", its what the apostle Paul himself wrote:

      A wife does not have authority over her own body, but rather her husband, and similarly a husband does not have authority over his own body, but rather his wife. 5Do not deprive each other, except perhaps by mutual consent for a time, to be free for prayer, but then return to one another, so that Satan may not tempt you through your lack of self-control.

      And what Solomon wrote in Song of Songs:

      You are a garden locked up, my sister, my bride;
              you are a spring enclosed, a sealed fountain.
      13 Your plants are an orchard of pomegranates
              with choice fruits,
              with henna and nard,
      14 nard and saffron,
              calamus and cinnamon,
              with every kind of incense tree,
              with myrrh and aloes
              and all the finest spices.
      15 You are[b] a garden fountain,
              a well of flowing water
              streaming down from Lebanon.

      She
      16 Awake, north wind,
              and come, south wind!
      Blow on my garden,
              that its fragrance may spread everywhere.
      Let my beloved come into his garden
              and taste its choice fruits.

      Somehow, I dont think theyre talking about horticulture here. The book is pretty explicitly pro "be intimate with your spouse", and theres not a hint of guilt in the whole book.

    45. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Guilt about sex is one of the things religion uses to keep people in line.

      Except for the whole book of Song of Solomon, you mean.

      But dont let your ignorance get in the way of your anti-religious sentiment, this is slashdot and theres karma to be had.

      Ah; but he said religion, not religious texts. As such, he's talking about Catholic Priests, Southern Baptist Politicians, and Moslem extremists (and safely ignoring scriptural texts, polygamist religions, and anything else that contradicts the reasonable argument).

      Better to say that people in power use sexual shame to control the masses. Witness the American movie rating system where mammaries boost the movie to an M rating (while most kids under the age of 5 see them all the time), but blowing a person to bits with a high explosive is only PG-13.

    46. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Fighting straw with false dichotomy?

      I think he's arguing that the implied religion in the xp's post is not what's at fault, but something else.

      I'd say that something else is politicians (some of whom also hold religious offices of power).

      Sex is definitely a relational lever, and is used by everyone. Because sex is related to human emotions and hormonal levels in the brain which affect many physiological and thought-based functions, it's kind of an obvious one. Blaming religion as taking especial advantage of it is definitely a straw man.

    47. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    48. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense. It fucks with their dopamine levels. Dopamine is a feel-good drug. When their horny little sexcapades don't register as strongly on the pleasure measure anymore, they turn up the volume to compensate.

      I kinda doubt it would have the same effect on a girl who wasn't already somewhat slutty. If she's a depressed asexual introvert who gets her daily dopamine fix from Ben & Jerry's and a bar of chocolate (rather than, say, from taking nude pictures of herself and posting them on an imageboard somewhere), well, she'll probably go for Ben & Jerry's and more chocolate.

    49. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by ewieling · · Score: 1

      I was the one who was blaming religion. I did so partially because I was being lazy. You are correct that people and institutions of power try to control sex to control people. One thing I find funny about this thread is all this talk about sex between a husband and wife for procreation. This is the only sex which seems to be guilt free and I was not thinking of that when I posted.

      I've had a lot of sex involving a large number of different fetishes, combinations of genders, and number of participants, but *never* for procreation. Sex for me is entirely about recreation. Sex is *powerful*, so powerful I think it scares the people in power. That is the sex people and institutions in power try to make people feel guilty about.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    50. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      The paper did not at all look at causation. Only correlation. The paper does mention that infection is not a random event so both the self-harm and infection could be caused by the same thing. Also I think I read somewhere that most infections come from undercooked meat.

    51. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by RandyOo · · Score: 1

      Cats are carriers. Rodents are part of their life cycle. Rodents infected with these parasites tend to be "more brave", some even to the point of taunting a cat to attack them.

      Humans are just unintended side show for the parasite, but since these affect behaviour in mice brains, it is not surprising these parasites affect human brains too.

      Maybe there aren't many humans being preyed upon by felines nowadays, but has that always been the case?

      Parasite Rex is an excellent book, by the way, if the subject holds any interest to you at all.

    52. Re:The chicken and egg problem all over again by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Any citation for the gut bacteria swapping reference? I'd really like to forward that to a family doctor who refuses to prescribe me some baby poop.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  4. chicken or the egg? by LSDelirious · · Score: 2

    Which came first? Crazy cat lady got 20 cats because she is crazy, or cat lady went crazy because she has 20 cats?

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
    1. Re:chicken or the egg? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Maybe the lady got one cat, got infected, went crazy, and got 19 more? (Remember, the parasite causes rodents to be attracted to cats; maybe it has a similar effect in humans.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely they had one cat which infected them. They then, like the rodents, became attracted to the cat pheromones and began accumulating more and more cats. The T.Gondii then drives them crazy, turning them into crazy cat ladies.

    3. Re:chicken or the egg? by matunos · · Score: 1

      Humans don't need parasites to be attracted to cats. Kittens work for that purpose just fine.

    4. Re:chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More likely they had one cat which infected them. They then, like the rodents, became attracted to the cat pheromones and began accumulating more and more cats. The T.Gondii then drives them crazy, turning them into crazy cat ladies."

      Exactly! The they commit suicide and get eaten by the yet uninfected cats and so the story goes on.

    5. Re:chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans don't need parasites to be attracted to cats. Kittens work for that purpose just fine.

      How can you be certain they work via a mechanism other than the parasite?

    6. Re:chicken or the egg? by celle · · Score: 1

      "Humans don't need parasites to be attracted to cats. Kittens work for that purpose just fine."

            That and brainwashed into consumerism. Ooooohh! kittens, aren't they cute.(but it's wrong!!-- ren and stimpy) New kittens, new toys. More crap to collect and be stuck with being responsible for, you know like the wife, kids, dog, job, crappy government, crooked corporations, crooked corporations trying to be crappy government and the reverse, etc.

  5. don't trust em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    sure, this looks like valid research, until you see the citations

    Resurch dun by Carnegie Meloncat Institute fellows:
    Hovercat
    Longcat
    Dunecat
    with speshul thx 2 cieling cat hoo make all tings possible

  6. Attraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    causing them to become suicidally attracted

    Judging from my (and I gather I am not alone in the /. type "social" circle) experience with women, this fits it to a tee. Perhaps I should start looking for a high enough cliff because I don't want to be compared to rats!

    1. Re:Attraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to be compared to lemmings?

  7. Terrorist Weapon? by sanman2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    (obligatory)
    But what if terrorists find a way to use this?

    1. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Emo music sales soar 10.000%.

    2. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by pyzondar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lolcats, schrödinger's zombiecats, misfortune-bringers of doom, spreading of mind controlling suicide parasites.. I fear cats more than any quoran toting goofball out there. It is time for someone to do something.

    3. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by znrt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      methinks it was irony. it made me smile, anyway.
      because it's not completely unbelievable that some fuctard in some govt office or news show eventually dished out such and idiotic thought to fuel the turrsts panic story. in fact, it's a very accurate caricature. bitter, if you like, but caricatures often are.

    4. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting denotation of 10 percent, though.

    5. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Interesting way interpret "ten thousand percent", American.

    6. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by dimeglio · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In some countries, the period is used to separate 1000's and the comma is the "decimal" point. Thus, 10,000 dollars would be 10.000,00

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    7. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Informative

      SI standards specify that a period (or a comma, for that matter, the proper indicator is a space), should not be used for digit grouping, which means the "American" interpretation is actually the internationally accepted scientific/engineering standard.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    8. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by datavirtue · · Score: 1
      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As it should be. Now if we could start pushing the one true Imperial unit system. Keep the faith brothers.

    10. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Well, given how slashdot explicitly declares itself an American centric site...

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    11. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      But what about a spherical, hypothetical cat in a locked box?

    12. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by xQx · · Score: 1, Funny

      FYI. It says 10% here in Australia too.

      I guess the grandparent just wanted us to know that it is 10% accurate to +- 0.0004%

    13. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's not an American thing. It's obviously a typo, dumbass. If you'd have said "Mick" or "Spick" instead of "American" you'd be a bigot... no, wait, you ARE a bigot.

      Fuck off, dipshit.

    14. Re:Terrorist Weapon? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      It's obviously a typo, dumbass.
      Could be, but plenty of cultures reverse the period/comma usage.

      That's not an American thing.
      Writing numbers a certain way isn't necessarily an American thing, but thinking that there's only one 'right' way to do something is rather American.

      If you'd have said "Mick" or "Spick" instead of "American" you'd be a bigot... no, wait, you ARE a bigot.
      So I'm bigoted against myself? Observing my own culture's weak points is bigotry? Self-deprecating humor is a bad thing now?

      Fuck off, dipshit.
      Oh, looks like I hit a nerve. Poor baby, I'm sure momma can make it all better. Run along now.

  8. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope my ex-wife has got it. And she probably has.

    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would explain a lot about my ex.

  9. Kill all cats. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are a menace to public health.

    That's what people would say if cats were ugly, anyway. But they are cute, so they are permitted to carry disease. Only ugly species are eligable for culling.

    1. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been saying the same about human babies... they just vomit and crap all over the place and it's not like you can eat that stuff... And i happen to find babies especially ugly once they pop out -- do coworkers really need to send photos of that 'thing' when it's all ugly and red as soon as its done cooking?

    2. Re:Kill all cats. by matunos · · Score: 2

      Well, they also help defend against the Plague by killing the carriers.

    3. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many have you seen before they popped out? I know I tried looking but no matter how much I stretched my wife I just couldn't see them...

    4. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't do that... they're even worse if you see them before they pop out. And in their future, all that's awaiting them is probably some hipster occupy movement. Now get off my lawn and stop breeding things that step on my lawn!

    5. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are a menace to public health.

      That's what people would say if cats were ugly, anyway. But they are cute, so they are permitted to carry disease. Only ugly species are eligable for culling.

      Also make sure the dogs get killed too. Since they are also a menace to public health.

    6. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And how many have you seen before they popped out? I know I tried looking but no matter how much I stretched my wife I just couldn't see them...

      Didn't you go to any of your wife's ultrasounds during her pregnancy?

      Or do you live in the USA or other country with 3rd world medical care?

    7. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has been my experience that without exception people that think of cats that way tend to be serial killers or have the potential to be serial killers anyway.

    8. Re:Kill all cats. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      They are a menace to public health. That's what people would say if cats were ugly, anyway. But they are cute, so they are permitted to carry disease. Only ugly species are eligable for culling.

      All animals carry diseases, including human beings. Maybe we should sterilise the Earth, and leave a nice clean Lunar environment.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Kill all cats. by Larryish · · Score: 2

      Nuke it from orbit.

      It's the only way to be sure.

    10. Re:Kill all cats. by Inda · · Score: 1

      Oooooooh, now you've gone and upset the cat-huggers.

      What is the quickest, safest and risk-free way of culling them?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    11. Re:Kill all cats. by Crag · · Score: 1

      Sure, we could do that ...

      Or we could just, you know, do science and learn to overcome this parasite and any related phenomena. Then we'd get the benefits of cats (lower blood pressure, etc) without the negative side effect, AND we'd benefit from the increase in our knowledge.

      Just sayin'.

    12. Re:Kill all cats. by hoppo · · Score: 1

      OK. You first. I promise we'll carry on your vision after you're gone.

    13. Re:Kill all cats. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Rats are cute, and people still call for their destruction. (Am I the only person who thinks they are achingly cute?)

    14. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You should forgive your uncle someday, too.

    15. Re:Kill all cats. by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1

      Oh? And just how many serial killers have you associated with? Is this a statistically valid sampling, and if so, why do you keep such company?

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
    16. Re:Kill all cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a slashdotter, his wife was purely hypothetical. His "hands-on experience" of vagina stretching was actually gleaned from photos he downloaded off the internet.

  10. Circle of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the rodents supposed to then get it from the dead bodies littering the bottom of the bridge / canyon / etc?

  11. From a cat's perspective by lolococo · · Score: 1

    I thought we were the parasites

    1. Re:From a cat's perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, from the Cat's perspective, we are the Butler, Waiter, Maid, Matrede, and Slave.

  12. The Origin? by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first stage in the evolution of the Gou'ald has begun.

    1. Re:The Origin? by azalin · · Score: 1

      The first stage in the evolution of the Gou'ald has begun.

      I'm pretty sure even these would be embarrassed to mention they descended from cat poo. Monkey doesn't sound that bad compared to this.

    2. Re:The Origin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sure explains the whole egypcian worship of cats.

  13. Let's tease the tiger by InterGuru · · Score: 2

    The purpose of the behavioral change in rats is to get the rat gobbled up by a cat so that the parasite could reproduce. I wonder if toxoplasmosis in humans promotes reckless and suicidal behavior. This would give the parasite another opportunity to reproduce. Just imagine 50,000 years ago a suicidal or reckless person decided to taunt a hungry tiger. One strike by the annoyed tiger, and the toxoplasmosis would have access to a warm cat gut to reproduce. Isn't nature wonderful

    1. Re:Let's tease the tiger by minio · · Score: 1

      You are actually right. Athough these days this strategy get you more likely hit by car than eaten by tiger.

    2. Re:Let's tease the tiger by azalin · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know how well toxoplasmosis reproduces in the warm guts of an SUV?

    3. Re:Let's tease the tiger by khr · · Score: 1

      Hence the famous palindrome, "was it a car or a cat I saw?"

  14. Not surprising by minio · · Score: 1

    T. gondi is known for its ability to change human behaviour like inducing depression and causing loss of attention. Its only goal is to get you eaten by its next host so suicide fits in nicely.

  15. I have 7 cats by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    and no one has offed themselves in my house. Maybe smoking dope counteracts the parasite :)

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:I have 7 cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parasites can wait a long time, sooner or later you'll become worm food... So the question is, assuming you are even infected, will smoking dope lead you to die sooner than average? And, if so, was this behaviour (smoking dope) influenced by the Parasite?

      Surgeon Generals Warning: Only read this comment while high.

    2. Re:I have 7 cats by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Parasites can wait a long time, sooner or later you'll become worm food... So the question is, assuming you are even infected, will smoking dope lead you to die sooner than average? And, if so, was this behaviour (smoking dope) influenced by the Parasite?

      Surgeon Generals Warning: Only read this comment while high.

      So, how does one go about volunteering for THAT study? ;-) Real men do not use emoticons, I happen to be unreal!

    3. Re:I have 7 cats by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe Toxoplasma gondii merely causes its hosts to engage in higher risk behaviours. In the wild, for small prey animals such as rats and mice, that is likely to be lethal and result in being eaten by a suitable carrier, but in this artificial environment we live in, perhaps it manifests in other ways. For example, flouting controlled substance laws to gamble 20-30 IQ points against a little temporary euphoria - then bragging about it - that sort of thing.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:I have 7 cats by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      >For example, flouting controlled substance laws to gamble 20-30 IQ points against a little temporary euphoria - then bragging about it - that sort of thing.

      Wow let me check my self as I don't want to upset the gmen by smoking a plant that grows like a weed around the globe but hey I'd better listen you and just hit the bottle. After all why not support the gov by paying taxes on alcohol cosumption.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  16. Zombie Virus by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once the cats perfect this virus it's all over...

    1. Re:Zombie Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean "purr-fect" this virus, eh?

  17. Correlation != causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Exactly. Also:

    2) the parasite spreads itself by infecting the nervous system of rodents, causing them to become suicidally attracted to feline odors

    Suicidally? Being attracted to something known to shorten your lifespan doesn't mean you're suicidal. Take one example: Americans gorging themselves on McDonald's, then flooding hospitals with heart disease cases in an attempt to stay alive. If they were suicidal, they'd just keep eating more burgers and look emo about it till they died.

    1. Re:Correlation != causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      So a suicide mission shouldn't be called a suicide mission? the people doing it probably don't want to die, but they're doing it for another purpose

    2. Re:Correlation != causation by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention the fact that attraction to feline odors is only suicidal to humans when we run into burning buildings to try and retrieve our kitties from underneath the bed, and emerge with second-degree burns and major laceration wounds (burns from the fire, laceration wounds from... well, nevermind. Our little kitty is safe. Pissed, but he'll get over that as soon as we give him some tuna.)

    3. Re:Correlation != causation by busyqth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take one example: Americans gorging themselves on McDonald's

      Even Americans we know that there's more to life than McDonalds.
      For example, there's Burger King, KFC, Taco Bell, Dunkin Donuts and all sorts of other places.

    4. Re:Correlation != causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or run full face into hungry lions, cheetas, tigers, panthers, etc...

    5. Re:Correlation != causation by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Also:

      2) the parasite spreads itself by infecting the nervous system of rodents, causing them to become suicidally attracted to feline odors

      Suicidally? Being attracted to something known to shorten your lifespan doesn't mean you're suicidal. Take one example: Americans gorging themselves on McDonald's, then flooding hospitals with heart disease cases in an attempt to stay alive. If they were suicidal, they'd just keep eating more burgers and look emo about it till they died.

      Is it still suicide if one didn't intend to kill one's self? I believe it is more of an accidental death. Though some people would put Darwin Award level accidents into the suicide category.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Correlation != causation by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in your analogy, the burgers won't eat you when you try to approach.

    7. Re:Correlation != causation by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      Is that why my wife wants to go on safari? Time to get some medicine for T gondii.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    8. Re:Correlation != causation by tkalfigo · · Score: 1

      Could be right, but then again McD's doesn't gain anything clogging a junkeater's arteries. It doesn't increase their chances of more revenues; on the contrary it kills a good customer. Whereas the parasite makes the rat go where it shouldn't want to, because in the long run it increases the parasite's chances of reproduction. If only McD's could find a way to make a small commission our of each one they send to the hospital/morgue, it would all make so much more sense.

    9. Re:Correlation != causation by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Parisite is in mouse, wants to be in cat, parisite biologically iteracts with mouse so mouse it is attracted to cat urine, parisite successful. Burger is in McDonalds, wants to be in you, burger biologically interacts with you so you are attracted to Mcdonalds, burger successful. "Burger" is a species. They act with a group mind.

    10. Re:Correlation != causation by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Have patience. One day they will balance the "addiction" versus "artery clogging" algorithm.

    11. Re:Correlation != causation by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

      You really worked hard on that, didn't you?

    12. Re:Correlation != causation by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      I'm having a slow week.

    13. Re:Correlation != causation by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

      It was actually kudos. ;)

    14. Re:Correlation != causation by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Damn, it's that self-depricating voice in my head again. It sounded like something a very sarcastic teacher used to say to me when my work was substandard: "You worked hard on that, didn't you?" Another one was "You always try hard, don't you?" And then she would look at what I had written and sigh.

  18. Liger Cat Box by RudyHartmann · · Score: 1

    So, I mean like, does this mean if you have, like, a liger, cleaning his cat box will, like, blow up the whole, like, neighborhood? Or maybe, like, the parasites will, like eat my face? Gosh. Idiots! I'm sure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liger

    --
    Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
  19. it is not a new and a known fact about toxoplasma by bilbobugginz · · Score: 1

    This virus originates in rodents, and feeds on tissue (dead tissue).

    In order to increase the food it developed a trick to attack the area of the brains related to danger/sexual "high".
    In rats/mice it cause them to not run away from the cats (there are claims it makes the mice behave as if they are sexually aroused by cats)
    In human males it causes lousy risk management, so that people infected are prone to dangerous activities (it appears >60% of donored organs are toxoplasmosis infected),
    All of which indicates it attacks complex and subtle parts of nervous system.

    So it is no surprise it attacks human females by this being prone to suicide.

    Kinda makes sense.

  20. RadioLab by crsuperman34 · · Score: 1

    WNYCs podcast RadioLab did an excellent segment having to do with the same parasite (and cats) on an episode entitled 'Parasites,' highly recommend.

  21. They are no going to be the same by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    by changing an infected animal's litter

    Now I know that they are not going to be the same between men and women. A woman is likely to change their litter box more than once a year; which is what a man will do.

    1. Re:They are no going to be the same by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I do is the cat lives outside. But as a gadget lover, what I would do if I had an indoor cat is get a snazzy litterbox. And if the cat crapped on the rug in protest of the shit machine I'd swap it out for another cat. Maybe show the new cat a picture of the old cat going away...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:They are no going to be the same by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      There's a better way - toilet-train the furballs instead. I have two cats whom I, after much hair-pulling, successfully trained to use a regular toilet. It's also a lot cheaper and more sanitary, and stinks less too. One flush and their leavings are dealt with. No litter box to clean also means no more of a risk of diseases than one encounters from regularly cleaning a toilet used only by humans in the first place. Note that the smarter the cat and the more time and patience you can muster, the faster he or she will pick it up.

      Look on Amazon for "The Toilet Trained Cat".

      (I am not associated with Amazon or the book's author. Just seemed apropos.)

    3. Re:They are no going to be the same by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There's a better way - toilet-train the furballs instead. I have two cats whom I, after much hair-pulling, successfully trained to use a regular toilet. It's also a lot cheaper and more sanitary, and stinks less too. One flush and their leavings are dealt with.

      Wouldn't you also need a flush that the cats could operate? In my experience, they really don't like leaving an uncovered pile of crap, and I'm not sure floating in water would count for them.

      But if you've actually done it, I'm seriously impressed.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  22. and so planet of the apes begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't this creepily like the plot of why humans needed to domesticate apes because some plague wiped out all cats and dogs.....
    well this takes care of cats
    KEEP THAT CRAP away form me too.....might also explain in said movies how apes with a few guns were able to kill off most humans they all went nuts.....

  23. Religion too by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

    Also evidence of correlation with religion ; a higher incidence than average amongst Muslims and Christians (a shame this study didn't assay Atheists though).

    1. Re:Religion too by Hans+Adler · · Score: 1

      A total study size of 100 individuals and marginal differences found? That's not what I'd call evidence.

    2. Re:Religion too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also evidence of correlation with religion ; a higher incidence than average amongst Muslims and Christians (a shame this study didn't assay Atheists though).

      You make a pretty general statement, but the link seems to show a study saying that in N. Africa, Muslims have a higher incidence of cat parasites than Christians, while both populations are above the world average.

  24. Scooped by maweki · · Score: 1

    I was sure I have read that on Cracked.com years ago. Can't seem to find it now :(

    1. Re:Scooped by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      This has been going around for a while. You have probably seen it before.

  25. soo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    getting close to a pussy can get you a parasite that makes you suicidally attracted to pussy, in rodents that is

  26. 50% is still not that much by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A 50% increase is statistically significant, but in absolute numbers wouldn't make that much of a difference, certainly well under the "killed by cars" number, and we don't care enough about that to actually fix the problem.

    What I see out of this, and others like it, is that there are a large number of diseases we get infected with over our lives that never leave us, and have effects well into our old age. We wouldn't have "evolved" out of them because the evolutionary pressure for things that don't affect us until after we've passed on our genes is small and indirect. How many "diseases" and infections do we have by the time we are die? What would our old age be like if we managed to avoid/cure them all?

    1. Re:50% is still not that much by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      It affects risk management, increasing risk-taking behaviour, so part of that "killed by cars" number could also be attributed to T.Gondii...in fact I remember reading about other studies that have explicitly linked (or tried to link) the two.

    2. Re:50% is still not that much by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It affects risk management, increasing risk-taking behaviour,

      If true, what do you think would be appropriate steps to take? It seems to me to be more a dog-based conspiracy. Some mythical "cat-spread" disease that's incurable that causes unknown undesirable effects.

    3. Re:50% is still not that much by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      "old age be like": like this. avoid predators/cure polio. old age is relative.

    4. Re:50% is still not that much by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Old age is not realtive. The median age may shorten with circumstances, but it does not lengthen, other than eliminating shortening factors. In the absence of shortening factors, people will die by 120 years in almost all cases. So I reject your unsubstantiated premise/conclusion.

    5. Re:50% is still not that much by Hatta · · Score: 2

      A 50% increase is statistically significant

      No, you don't know whether it's statistically significant unless you know the uncertainty in the measurement. A 50% increase with a standard deviation of 100% would not be statistically significant. A 1% increase with a standard deviation of .1% would be statistically significant. And that's all without considering sample size.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:50% is still not that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A 50% increase is statistically significant

      A 50% increase can be statistically significant.

      Possible.... Is you look at the number 3 vs 2, you still have a 50% increase but not very significant.

      If we area talking about 750 vs 500. You sill have the same rate of increase.

      We also need to factor in the sample size on each one of these.

  27. Re:it is not a new and a known fact about toxoplas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently a lesser known fact is that Toxoplasma are protozoa, not viruses.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:Zombie Protozoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toxoplasma is not a virus.

  30. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it T. gondii attacks some regulatory function in the brain that inhibits risk-taking behavior, which for rodents is associated via different mechanisms with the detection of cats and other predators.

    The unusual transmission mechanisms of the parasite were probably known before this Maryland/Denmark study which has to do with the effect of T. gondii on the mental health of human hosts.

  31. Ok, that rodents are driven to "suicidal" behavior by seeking out a cat isn't the same kind of suicide drive, almost certainly.

    The rodent probably isn't being driven to despair, where it makes a calculus to kill itself. It's probably just thinking running up to that cat is a good idea instead of a bad one.

    Rhetorical fail in the article.

    Or success, I supppose. :(

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. My evidence differs... by bughunter · · Score: 2

    Of course, my evidence consists of multiple repeated viewings of Tom and Jerry, Sylvester and Tweety, and Pinky and the Brain, but according to my research, it's exposure to Mince and Rats that creates suicidal tendencies in Cats.

    Just saying.

    Narf.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  33. Egg or chicken? Cat or Parasite? by 109+97+116+116 · · Score: 1

    Maybe cat loving ladies have this parasite and they give it to their cats instead.

  34. Re:Really? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Natural selection happens.

  35. FUCKING CATS! KILL THEM ALL! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Shit i have 2 cats...

    FUCK EM!

    1. Re:FUCKING CATS! KILL THEM ALL! by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      If you want to fuck your cat, you are probably attracted to them above average. See a doctor to check you for T. gondii.

  36. So... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Number 1 was the cat

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  37. Re:Really? by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    A relatively simple method would be a feedback loop. The parasite could stimulate dopamine receptors whenever it is exposed to compounds linked to feline odor. Since the parasite is already in the nervous system, it would be pretty easy for it to be hanging around the blood-brain barrier or the nasal system to receive the odors first hand even.

    Ever see the dumb shit people will do coked up? Now reduce the cognitive inhibitions to the level of a rodent. Chemically, it's all the same.

  38. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are numerous studies on the behavioral effects of toxplasmosis infection on humans.

  39. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been proven that owning a lighter will increasce your chances of getting lung cancer. Be safe! Use matches!

  40. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by i286NiNJA · · Score: 2

    There is no "Uninformative" to mod you down.
    Yeah they've done plenty of studies linking various changes in human behavior to toxoplasmosis infection. Your claim is so strange that I almost wonder if you're part of the pro-toxoplasmosis conspiracy or maybe you're a toxoplasmosis forcing a crazy cat lady to type these things.

  41. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by Splab · · Score: 1

    No it's not. TFA states "positive correlation", that does not mean it has been proven, but just they are seeing an interesting trend.

  42. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by filthpickle · · Score: 1

    It's a witch!!!!

  43. Interesting topic, poor summary by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Danish study is just the latest in a long series of studies which demonstrate a correlation between toxoplasmosis seropositivity and psychiatric problems-- it's been linked to schizophrenia and ADHD, and so on. Wikipedia has a good article on the topic.

    It's pretty interesting. Apparently something like 10% of the US population is seropositive for toxo. The infection is thought to be "contained" immunologically, but encysted organisms are still present in muscle and nervous tissue, and the process of "containment" may induce a subtle inflammatory state which affects a broad variety of neurotransmitters (not just dopamine). It's also possible that the causation works the other way-- the people who get chronic infections may have something about their immune system that is different to begin with, and the difference might predispose them to psychiatric problems independently of toxo infection. Good discussion of all that in the Danish study, which was published in Archives of General Psych and seems to be non-paywalled.

    What will be really interesting is to see what happens if you identify psychiatric patients with chronic toxo and try to eradicate the toxo with antibiotics-- do their psych symptoms improve? There have been at least two studies I could find (one where it helped and one where it didn't), and apparently there's a large-scale study getting started in the UK.

  44. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rodent's brain is already wired to recognize and respond to the odor, so the hard part was already done. All the parasite needed to do was modify or override the response.

  45. Same parasite causes MISCARRIAGES during prenancy by ivi · · Score: 2

    Subj says it all. Others may have noticed the same.

    Could those in the extra 53% suicidal women have suffered earlier miscarriages, by any chance?

  46. Control group by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For people who are wondering, it looks like they didn't have a good control group. So here is how they answered some potential objections:

    1) What if depressed people get cats, and that's why they have the parasite? Did they check people who have cats but aren't depressed?
    It's probably not related to cats, because most people who get this parasite get it from undercooked meat.

    2) What if depressed people are more susceptible to this parasite because they are depressed? What if non-depressed people are capable of fighting off the parasite with a stronger immune system?
    There was no correlation between people who had the parasite, and people who had a history of mental illness. (Also, correlates with other studies, that might have had better control groups, I'm too lazy to check them out to see).

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  47. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hello, looks like you've thought up an objection within 5 seconds of reading the summary. Given that these scientists have spent several years working on this project, you don't think they could have also thought of something similar, do you? Oh wait, they did.

    Next time, please at least read the article before spreading your inanity. Scientists usually think of the simple stuff.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  48. Increased rate in traffic accidents by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You seem to know about this field. Can you translate this part for me?

    Separate logistic regression for RhD-negative subjects showed a 2.53 times higher risk of traffic accidents in Toxoplasma-infected than Toxoplasma-free subjects (CI95: 1.12–5.7, t = 2.23, P = 0.026). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/72

    Are they really saying that this is causing "2.53 times higher risk of traffic accidents" among their infected population of Czech male military draftees???

    Imagine the repercussions if this is found to be also true in other populations (not that it will be, and not that correlation equals causation, but...):

    Car Insurance rates (or driver licenses) could start depending on the results of those blood tests. Criminal sentencing could be affected by the results of those tests. And at the very minimum, the next time you'd fill out a questionnaire for getting car insurance, or filling out an application for becoming a truck driver or operating heavy machinery, or applying to get into the military, you'd be asked all kinds of questions about your history with cats (whether you owned one, your significant other owned one, or whether your family ever owned one while you were growing up).

    1. Re:Increased rate in traffic accidents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and they are quite certain that the effect is real.

    2. Re:Increased rate in traffic accidents by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      or applying to get into the military, you'd be asked all kinds of questions about your history with cats

      Well, I ate a pussy once

    3. Re:Increased rate in traffic accidents by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      or applying to get into the military, you'd be asked all kinds of questions about your history with cats

      Well, I ate a pussy once

      As this is slashdot, it's rather more likely you had a feline BBQ than engaged in cunnilingus on a hardwood floor.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Increased rate in traffic accidents by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You mean "Bo B Q" like Mr. Obama?

  49. Cat Scratch Fever..... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    It was popular in the 1970's, you can go to the doctor and get the cure.... ;-)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  50. a better explanation of the study by WiPEOUT · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:a better explanation of the study by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      only 1% later self-harmed

      Thanks, I was looking for that number. That's quite significant with 45k people.

    2. Re:a better explanation of the study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the effect size is moderate. But the actual risk in absolute number terms for any given individual remains small, and the trumps the other data. The linked discussion in Nursing Times makes clear that the study was not well controlled. It also points out that there are multiple potential sources of toxoplasmosis infection, most of which are considerably more common ways of getting the infection than handling cats. So, no reason to put kitty to sleep just yet.

  51. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by GrahamCox · · Score: 2

    British rednecks

    I know what you're trying to say, but this is a contradiction in terms. There is no sun in Britain to give anyone a red neck.

  52. Goto google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and type in 10.000%. Result from google's calculator: 10.00000% = 0.1

    how do we interpret that result, non-American?

    1. Re:Goto google by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      how do we interpret that result, non-American?

      I am American.

  53. Obligatory by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3

    Crazy or just plain HOT? You decide :)

  54. Re:Same parasite causes MISCARRIAGES during prenan by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I also seem to remember that the same parasite can cause a whole host of problem in a developing fetus too.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  55. Another reason not to have animals as pets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In addition to it being torture on the animal it will have all sorts of negative effects on humans, and this is just one of them. Having animals as "pets" essentially holding them prisoner. We have come to a point we no longer need animals for anything whether it is food, clothing, companionship, rescue, etc. Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?

    1. Re:Another reason not to have animals as pets by snowraver1 · · Score: 2

      My cat has a better life than me, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Another reason not to have animals as pets by busyqth · · Score: 2

      Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?

      Because that would be stupid.

    3. Re:Another reason not to have animals as pets by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?

      Because that would be stupid.

      Why not ban having machines as slaves?

    4. Re:Another reason not to have animals as pets by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      In addition to it being torture on the animal it will have all sorts of negative effects on humans, and this is just one of them. Having animals as "pets" essentially holding them prisoner. We have come to a point we no longer need animals for anything whether it is food, clothing, companionship, rescue, etc. Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?

      Good luck trying to keep a cat prisoner.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Another reason not to have animals as pets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have come to a point we no longer need animals for anything whether it is food, clothing, companionship, rescue, etc"

      That is provably bullshit, especially the companionship part.

  56. Ceiling cat iz in ur head... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    ...watching you go crazy.

  57. Re:Really? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    I think it T. gondii attacks some regulatory function in the brain that inhibits risk-taking behavior, which for rodents is associated via different mechanisms with the detection of cats and other predators.

    The rodents in question remain afraid of open spaces and unfamiliar foods. The only thing that appears to be targeted is the fear of cat urine.

  58. Parasites? Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Higher suicide in cat "owners" simply correlates to orders to compose a death poem and commit seppuku to regain honor.

    OBEY TEH KITTEH DAIMYO.

  59. Nothing here by santosh.k83 · · Score: 1

    Yes well, I've had multiple cats simultaneously since over a decade whilst being free of suicidal thoughts or mental disorders (even if I do say so myself), so this finding shouldn't discourage anyone from having them.

    1. Re:Nothing here by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yes well, I've had multiple cats simultaneously since over a decade whilst being free of suicidal thoughts or mental disorders (even if I do say so myself), so this finding shouldn't discourage anyone from having them.

      But similarly there are plenty of individuals who smoke and drink heavily and don't die of lung cancer or liver failure, It doesn't prove anything.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  60. I've heard this before by tsa · · Score: 1

    I can't help thinking that I've heard this before some years ago. Am I right or is this really a new finding?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  61. Re:Are there directions on how to infect my wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I already have, multiple times, if you know what I mean.

  62. In Dutch it is called "dakhaas" by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Dakhaas literally means roofrabbit and refers to the fact that if you cut the legs, you can pass cat for rabbit. Not in practice anymore but we did have the hungerwinter here thanks to the Americans being to scared to advance and leave the British and Polish forces without backup.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:In Dutch it is called "dakhaas" by rxmd · · Score: 2

      Coincidentally, in German it's called "Dachhase" and the origin is probably the siege of Vienna by the Turks in 1683, so I guess you got the term from the Germans.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    2. Re:In Dutch it is called "dakhaas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop complaining.
      If you had taken care of yourselves you wouldn't have had to sit around eating dakhaas while complaining about the Americans.

    3. Re:In Dutch it is called "dakhaas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, so it's the Americans' fault for not being reckless and not the Germans' fault for invading your country and blockading the food supply? You're a douche zak.

  63. Cat Feces, Yummm by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Check your expensive coffee!

  64. Suicide depends on intent by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Suicidally? Being attracted to something known to shorten your lifespan doesn't mean you're suicidal.

    It depends on the circumstances. In this case I would argue that it is suicidal because the parasite wants the mice to get eaten by the cat hence the intended outcome of the behaviour is for the mouse to kill itself (albeit at the parasite's urging). In the case of humans the tendency to overeat was a result of our stoneage heritage when food was scarce and so eating as much as possible when it was available was a survival trait. Now it might be harmful but because the original "intention" of the trait is to increase survival it is the opposite of suicidal. We just need to wait for evolution to catch up with our new era of abundant food.

    1. Re:Suicide depends on intent by flirno · · Score: 1

      No so much to 'kill' themselves but to be eaten by cats. Specifically death by cat.

  65. Bullstuff by norteo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am an aerospace engineer. If aircrafts where built with the rigorousity this study was done, every aircraft would crash.

  66. We all know pussy makes you crazy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    nuf sed

  67. Pandemic 2 by LightningRook · · Score: 1

    "the parasite spreads itself by infecting the nervous system of rodents, causing them to become suicidally attracted to feline odors which will increase the likelihood of their hosts being eaten by cats,"

    This sounds like a hack or a cheat for pandemic 2.

  68. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    British rednecks I know what you're trying to say, but this is a contradiction in terms. There is no sun in Britain to give anyone a red neck.

    Well, the wet collar could make your neck red and sore. Seriously though it is all too easy to get sunburn in summer in the UK, it often doesn't feel that hot but there is enough UV to burn!

  69. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    This is on the level of saying crop circles are made by bored aliens instead of British rednecks with boards and strings. We don't have rednecks in Britain, you insensitive clod!

    Retarded inbred scrumpy-addled yokels, fair enough, but they tend not to have shaved necks.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  70. Single women mostly have cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And single women are more likely to commit suicide.

    Did i just debunk this research in 1 sentence?

  71. Re:Same parasite causes MISCARRIAGES during prenan by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    When else would it cause a miscarriage, if not during pregnancy?

  72. Misuse of statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With large enough errors bars as in this case, 53% should be read as a random event.

  73. Banker Parasite Increases Risk of Suicide In Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fix the title eh...

  74. Do not learn them to flush. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    No, you do not want to learn them to flush

    "do not teach your cat to flush. Although it is possible, once they learn, many seem to enjoy it and will do it all the time, even when it's not appropriate to do so as no business has been done. This wastes water."

    1. Re:Do not learn them to flush. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Seems like a simple circuit could deactivate the flush device until the toilet needed flushing.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  75. Are effects permanent or not? by 2ms · · Score: 1

    I understand the effects of the parasite are related to cysts and the like that are produced and reside in the brain when the parasite is inactive. If you take the medication that kills the parasite, do you also get rid of the neurological effects, or is your brain possibly permanently altered?

  76. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah they've done plenty of studies linking various changes in human behavior to toxoplasmosis infection.

    No, they haven't really, at least not from what this article says - they've correlated certain behaviors to people with TP, that statistically don't happen (or as much) in people without the TP organism.

    To link *changes* in human behavior to it, you would have to know what their behavior was *before* infection, then infect them with TP, and then observe changes in their behaviors.

  77. Cat have already "hacked" our instincts. by DrYak · · Score: 2

    How can you be certain they work via a mechanism other than the parasite?

    Take a few random specimen of the felidae family.
    For each specimen, compare the young baby with the adult.
    - lion cub and adult lion
    - kitten and adult house cat
    etc.

    Notice anything peculiar? Unlike the wilder specimen, house cats tend to retain much more juvenile caracteristics: bigger eyes, more fluffy. (And that works also for noise: most bigger cats tend to be silent, or occasionnaly express deep menacing roars. Only house cats (even more than alley cats) tend to meow a lot, and keep a rather high-pitched voice). etc.

    We human tend to be pre-wired to be attracted to some traits (bigger eyes, high pitched voices, etc.) because that's how our babies look like. Thus we tend to find cats adorable because they share common trait with the babies that we're pre-wired to find adorable. From that point of view kittens are The Über-cats: even fluffier, even bigger eyes, even higher pitched voice, etc.

    Common cats have co-evolved with human while optimising some of their characteristics to be better appreciated by humans. In a way they have "hacked" into our instinctive behaviours. They don't need parasites to achieve that, they evolved their aspect so we can't resist but find them adorable.

    Note that the same could be noticed with other species which got adopted by the humans: in the canidae family compare adults dogs and wolves relative to their puppies dogs have partly evolved to look nicer and sweater. (well in the case of dogs there are other advantages too which led to humans adopting them, including social behaviour - dogs are highly social, hierarchical animals living in packs and hunting in an organised manner. Exactly like humans, thus making them interesting as hunting aids. Whereas cats are more autonomous. Their either live alone or in herds, making them more interesting as a "set and forget" solution to eradicate pests like rodent)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  78. It's in the dose by DrYak · · Score: 1

    For example, flouting controlled substance laws to gamble 20-30 IQ points against a little temporary euphoria - then bragging about it - that sort of thing.

    You know, contrary to what your government would like to think on your side of the Atlantic pond, consuming substances doesn't automatically result in permanent irreversible brain damage. Occasional moderate and responsible consumption in adults of some of these substance cause few if any permanent problems, as shown in the countries that we have here around with slightly more tolerance or slightly more liberal approach to said substances. Like with any other substance, its all a matter of dosage. So I slightly doubt that your comment on the 23-30 IQ points has any validity.
    (And the parent poster could even live in one of those countries, so his habits have absolutely nothing to do with "risk behaviours" and everything to do with bragging about how well he can keep nice plants growing on his balcony).

    *BUT*

    regarding the temporary euphoria: if by "smoking dope" the parent poster referred to THC-containing hemp derivative, you might be onto something.
    euphoria in this class of light hallucinogenic comes from their activity on the serotonin system. Acting on the serotonin system also helps battling against depression (that's also the mecanism behind SSRI-class anti-depressors).
    So it can be that the parent poster has a very light- mostly subclinical form of depression (call it dysthymia at this scale). Enough to be more attracted by cats. But also light enough that the euphoria induced by his... ahem.. "botanical"-consumption habits is enough to completely counter-act it.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  79. it's not like the depressed by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    would care less about personal hygiene ofcourse, ...

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  80. Re:A witch weighs the same as a duck by omnichad · · Score: 1

    You don't necessarily need sun. Capillary damage from constant alcohol use can cause a red neck with little sun.

  81. Huh, now that you mention it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sexual experience isn't as broad as some people's, and anecdote is not the singular form of data...

    ...but that said, there is a strong correlation in my sexual history between women who owned cats, were suicidal at some point during our relationship, and had high sexual appetites. All of the women who loved to fuck also owned multiple cats; all the ones who didn't, or were lukewarm about it, owned one or none.

    The one who had the most cats was the most sexually enthusiastic woman I've ever known. I met her through a mutual friend, and we were in bed by the end of our first date. She wanted to have sex twice a day, gave the best blowjobs I've ever had, loved anal sex (she could even have anal orgasms), had a history of bisexuality, and was seriously interested in threesomes.

    She was also the craziest, with more issues than National Geographic: severe depression, OCD, and a tendency to become emotionally abusive when she didn't get her way. She called me more than once and basically said "I want to kill myself, please help", and that got old fast. And she was way, way too into her cats; it seemed like her life revolved around them.

    Still, it wasn't easy to give her up (yes, I dumped her). In our time together, we fulfilled almost every sexual fantasy I've ever had. And her body was just amazing -- just the right amount of curves, and her vagina could grip me so tightly that I was almost afraid I wasn't going to get my cock back.

    And if a parasite was responsible for that? Well, then, thank you, Mr. Parasite!

  82. Veterinarians and suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Veterinarians tend to have the highest suicide rate amongst health professionals. Correlation? Causation? Hmm...