Slashdot Mirror


What's Wrong With American Ninja Warrior?

Reader Thom Stark (thomst) writes with a pointed review of this year's Americanized version of (awesome) Japanese TV show "Sasuke." "I've been a fan of the program the G4 channel calls "Ninja Warrior" since I first encountered it in mid-2005. For those who are unfamiliar with the show, it's a re-edited-for-American-TV version of a Japanese show called "Sasuke," with often-snarky English commentary and graphics overlaid on the Japanese original. "Ninja Warrior" is a fast-paced, wildly-entertaining program in which 100 contestants of varying skill levels pit themselves against a 4-stage obstacle course that grows ever more fiendishly difficult with each passing season. There've been 27 such seasons to date, and the most current incarnation has become so incredibly taxing that Batman himself would have trouble completing it. Now G4 has teamed up with its corporate parent, NBCUniversal, to bring the world's toughest obstacle course to America, and the resulting show, "American Ninja Warrior" turns out to be distinctly inferior to its Japanese progenitor. The final broadcast in a series that has run for six previous weekly installments appeared on July 9, with segments on both G4 and NBC, and I thought it was fitting that I mark the occasion with a critique of what I believe to be "American Ninja Warrior"'s fatal philosophical and production missteps, and contrast them with the original pitch-perfect product." (Read on below.)

First, it's important to understand that the Japanese program's name has nothing to do with either ninjas or warriors. "Sasuke" means something like "excellence" in Japanese. It has much the same flavor as the Greek concept of arete, the pursuit of excellence as a defining life goal. G4's marketeers clearly decided that their ADHD-addled core audience of video gamers was unlikely to find a show called "Excellence" compelling enough to warrant paying attention, so they decided to jazz it up by invoking ninjas, instead. Oh, and warriors, too, to make it more appealing to the World of Warcraft fanatics. And that was fine, as far as it went, because G4 had the good sense not to mess with the program content itself (other than to poorly translate much of the Japanese-language commentary, again in an apparent attempt to inject some good ol' American zazz).

As a side note, commentary is not the only translational sin of which G4 is guilty. The competition takes place at Midoriyama, a Japanese place name that G4 insists on referring to as "Mount Midoriyama." The problem with that is that "yama" is a Japanese suffix meaning "mountain." Thus, "Fujiyama" means "Mount Fuji" and "Midoriyama" means "Mount Midori" — which, in turn, means that G4's translation is not only redundant, with its repeating of the word "mountain" in both English and Japanese, it's wildly inaccurate, because the Japanese word means "Mount Midori."

But I digress.

"American Ninja Warrior" — the strictly-domestic production — suffers badly from human interest bloat. The Japanese program (at least as it is presented on G4) frequently features mini-portraits of the competitors, but these segments are very short — typically under 20 seconds — and they help to put a human face on the often-superhuman efforts of the program's contenders. In "American Ninja Warrior," the corresponding segments too often are near-epic mini-documentaries that run a minute or longer, and they seriously impair the program's flow — especially because there are so flinkin' many of them. The producers badly need to rein in their out-of-control bathos machinery and reduce both the number and the running time of their athlete portraiture.

But the worst mistake that the brainiacs behind "American Ninja Warrior" have made is to Americanize the competition. The most endearing philosophical quality of "Sasuke" is that the participants compete, not against each other, but individually against the course itself. There is no zero-sum in the game of Sasuke. Should more than one contestant complete the nigh-impossible series of obstacles (an outcome that has never yet occurred on "Sasuke"), both would be equally celebrated, both would be equally entitled to claim the title of "winner," and the accomplishment of one would in no way diminish the glory of the other. To the contrary, such an event would be cause for national celebration, since winners of "Sasuke" are considered national heroes in Japan.

By contrast, not only have the American producers chosen to have the participants compete against each other in regional qualifying events for a spot in the "finals" competition in Las Vegas (not an unreasonable choice, given that they needed to whittle the field down to a manageable number of contestants for the trials at the actual Mount Midori course), but they've made it a zero-sum game. Like the Highlander, there can be only one American Ninja Warrior — which reduces the exalted pursuit of excellence to just another athletic competition, with the top prize of half-a-million dollars going to the one contestant who not only completes the course, but does so in the fastest time. Anyone else who makes it to the top of Mount Midori is, basically, just another chump. An also-ran. A footnote.

And that's what's really wrong with "American Ninja Warrior."

220 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. There must be a winner by Princeofcups · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Japan, people are praised for trying their best. In most seasons, no one wins the final obstacle. In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure. I much prefer the Japanese way of looking at things.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    1. Re:There must be a winner by CodeHxr · · Score: 5, Funny

      I much prefer the Japanese way of looking at things

      I find this to be the case more often than not. Unless we're talking about vending machines... creepy.

    2. Re:There must be a winner by gknoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. This is what I loved about the Japanese show: I could honestly root for every single competitor, and sincerely hope that they could win. Those challenges are HARD! I love the spirit of camaraderie they show towards one another, and that some people compete just to have fun.

    3. Re:There must be a winner by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually we now do this in kiddie sports where everyone is a winner every season. supposedly people hate it

    4. Re:There must be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Japan, people are praised for trying their best. In most seasons, no one wins the final obstacle. In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure. I much prefer the Japanese way of looking at things.

      Fast-forward to a week or two from now where we'll see a report on the state of the American education system, explaining how more schools are shifting to a model where kids are praised for trying their best rather than actually understanding the material, and this same poster will be deriding that exact same trait he's gushing over now when it's done by Americans.

      Expect the word "coddling" when describing it being done by Americans and "supportive" when the Japanese do the exact same thing.

    5. Re:There must be a winner by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure.

      If you're under the age of 25, everyone is a winner. We wouldn't want to give people the impression that life is hard. Or that sometimes the only way to achieve something is with teamwork. Or even that the effort yields its own rewards. Fuck that noise -- I want everything now, with a large fry, and if anyone has a problem with that, I'll mount an uzi on my mobility scooter and rain bullets upon your shitty country while drinking beer and shouting "AAAAAMERICA, FUCK YEA!"

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:There must be a winner by heathen_01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      actually we now do this in kiddie sports where everyone is a winner every season. supposedly people hate it

      "people are praised for trying their best" is not the same as "everyone is a winner".

    7. Re:There must be a winner by Krojack · · Score: 1

      ^^ This. The Japanese one could have 5 champions or they could all be losers.

      Some of the extras are the goofy little outfits and 5 seconds of entertainment many of the contestants put on before they start their run.

      On and lets not forget "Women of Ninja Warrior". Komiya Rie, Mikie Hara, and Ayako Miyake. Lets not forget Sara Jean Underwood. Maybe the American version needs to get her on there. As for the guys, Makoto Nagano is just a pure badass.

    8. Re:There must be a winner by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's because when everyone wins, it's not a competition.

      In SASUKE, the trials are near-impossible. More often than not, nobody wins. It is not a competition against yourself, it is a competition against the challenge of the obstacle course. If multiple people win (never happened, but is always possible), it would be celebrated (and the next season's obstacles would probably be harder). If nobody wins, that's OK, too. But certainly there is never a time that everybody wins.

      And I would argue that if everyone wins, it encourages people to be lazy. If one person wins, it gives that person an ego and makes the losers disinterested. If nobody wins (because it is hard), or if winning is equally available to all but is incredibly difficult (a la SASUKE), it encourages people to try harder. On that note, isn't that the American spirit? That everyone has an equal opportunity to rise to the top, proportional to your efforts, and there is no zero-sum game?

    9. Re:There must be a winner by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure.

      Think you're missing something there, everyone in the last 25 years has been taught that "everyone is a winner" no matter if they fail here in the west, everyone is a winner. That crack head? Yeah they're a winner. The idiot, yep they're a winner. That soccer team who won by 7 more goals, well we need to take 3 of them away so the other team doesn't feel so bad(Happened in Ottawa and Toronto), then one of the teams who refused to follow the rules of "not scoring so much" was banned from playing for the rest of the season. Both teams were winners too though.

      Success should be celebrated. You don't get anywhere in life by celebrating the person who's doping up in an alleyway, or do you? Well I guess they're a hero to someone. Look, I know what you're saying, but it's not that they're celebrating that these guys were winners, but that they lost, and that they took their lumps, had fun, and kept going, rather than getting into a huff and throwing a temprtantrum like so many other people do. Japan does have a winner-first mentality too, and it's even worse than the US.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:There must be a winner by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm commenting here because I misclicked and downmodded you. I agree with your point - it's the difference between a participation ribbon and someone telling you where you were awesome and how you could improve.

    11. Re:There must be a winner by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      In Japan, people are praised for trying their best. In most seasons, no one wins the final obstacle. In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure. I much prefer the Japanese way of looking at things.

      And furthermore, in America there must be only one single winner in everything. You are never allowed to have multiple people complete some challenge and share in the victory. While in a lot of things it is reasonable to have only a single winner (or team of winners), such as most competition sports, people tend to spill this over into everything.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    12. Re:There must be a winner by sourcerror · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hate dried squids too. That's what you meant, right?

    13. Re:There must be a winner by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Japan, people are praised for trying their best. In most seasons, no one wins the final obstacle. In America, there has to be a winner to celebrate, everyone else is a failure. I much prefer the Japanese way of looking at things.

      Fast-forward to a week or two from now where we'll see a report on the state of the American education system, explaining how more schools are shifting to a model where kids are praised for trying their best rather than actually understanding the material, and this same poster will be deriding that exact same trait he's gushing over now when it's done by Americans.

      Expect the word "coddling" when describing it being done by Americans and "supportive" when the Japanese do the exact same thing.

      School should not be a competition. It is possible for everyone to win and it is possible for everyone to fail. (or rather, it should be this way; you are right about the coddling aspect though)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    14. Re:There must be a winner by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      everyone is a winner is totally opposite of the possibility that nobody might win.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:There must be a winner by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      *THIS* I hate that stupid US custom where you must tell everyone they are number one and they too can be an astronaut and president.

    16. Re:There must be a winner by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Makoto badass? IIRC he got beaten by a shoe salesman in Sasuke ;).

      --
    17. Re:There must be a winner by Canazza · · Score: 1

      But it's not.
      The Education system says it's alright to be average, not excellent, which is what Sasuke celebrates.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    18. Re:There must be a winner by jo42 · · Score: 1

      more schools are shifting to a model where kids are praised for trying their best rather than actually understanding the material

      Welcome to Dumbtardia. Where devolution to Idiocracy is a God Given Right!

    19. Re:There must be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do - field day for my kids amounts to one of the most uninspiring experiences I have witnessed. Back in my day each classroom was a team. You had strengths and weaknesses. The best athletes had their events. There was whole team competitions also so that everyone was involved in a least one or two events. There were ribbons for the winners. There was pride and angst and emotion.

      My kids field day is like PvE vs PvP. Yea, it can be fun at times. But the challenge isn't there and, thus, the kids don't give a shit about it. It's like bowling without keeping score.

    20. Re:There must be a winner by mr1911 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The first problem is in the name. There is nothing "warrior" about "American Ninja Warrior". I understand their chose because it wouldn't sound as interesting to the target audience to call it "American Ninja Gymnast".

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    21. Re:There must be a winner by AngryDeuce · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know, Kancho has me a little disturbed...

    22. Re:There must be a winner by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Everyone's a winner!
      But should they do something outside the norm, slight better?
      Then they're a hero!

    23. Re:There must be a winner by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The most egregious thing in my opinion is the human interest horseshit that has been inserted into everything that even remotely resembles reality TV these days. I mean, seriously, we're starting to get to the point where nobody can be a participant or contestant on a TV show unless their parents were tortured, raped and murdered by sex-crazed donkeys, they were forced to live on the streets from the age of three like something out of fucking Oliver Twist, they survived 847 forms of cancer or some other debilitating disease or deformity...

      If I ever see a serious contestant that isn't "coming out of a massive tragedy of epic proportions and beating incredible odds (c)(R)(TM)" I believe I may soil myself, and what's worse, it's causing a ridiculous arms race in who can come from the more fucked up background. Soon every contestant is going to have to be a refugee from some fucked up country run by a genocidal maniac or else they'll be considered too boring to be a contestant...

    24. Re:There must be a winner by RicoX9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was what I loved about the Japanese show. There was always more than one "winner" regardless of anyone finishing. These people were respected for their ability and effort. Multiple people could win, and all the contestants cheered for each other honestly and sincerely. This is where America has really fallen down.

    25. Re:There must be a winner by filthpickle · · Score: 2

      And I thought Daniel Tosh invented the Gaddafi...

    26. Re:There must be a winner by operagost · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Who doesn't love tentacle porn and warrantless police searches!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:There must be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      On that note, isn't that the American spirit? That everyone has an equal opportunity to rise to the top, proportional to your efforts, and there is no zero-sum game?

      F-ing Democrats! Must you turn everything into Socialism.

    28. Re:There must be a winner by brainzach · · Score: 1

      Athletic competition is more exciting when there is a winner.

      Marathons have one winner but the thousands of other finishers don't consider themselves failures. Many people think that finishing a marathon means that they accomplished something great despite losing.

    29. Re:There must be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I love the spirit of camaraderie they show towards one another"

      Exactly! None of the competitors view it as a competition among 100 people. They all view it as a competition between 100 people and Sasuke itself. Every competitor roots and pushes for every other competitor. When Nagano slips or loses his grip and takes a splash, not only does the audience feel distraught, but you can also see every other competitor's surprise, shock, and dismay. I think those truly dedicated to trying to conquer Sasuke want other competitor's to complete it as much as they themselves want to. They view total victory as a triump of the human spirit, not as a triump of a particular individual. And I agree with the reviewer that that spirit is lost in the American version.

    30. Re:There must be a winner by localman57 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note to all: Wikipedia entries are usually safe for work. Not today...

    31. Re:There must be a winner by dthx1138 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, we don't tell every kid that they ARE going to be an astronaut or President. We tell them that they CAN BE if they dream big and work hard.

      Why don't we just crush their aspirations early on? Because America is supposed to be a society where you can become anything you want, no matter what you look like or where you came from. Obviously we have struggled at times to live up that ideal. But, then again, nobody's perfect.

      --
      I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
    32. Re:There must be a winner by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      On that note, isn't that the American spirit? That everyone has an equal opportunity to rise to the top, proportional to your efforts, and there is no zero-sum game?

      No, and it never has been. Trying your best isn't economical.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    33. Re:There must be a winner by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Al Bundy was on Sasuke!

    34. Re:There must be a winner by aitikin · · Score: 1

      If you paid attention to the grandparent's post, it read, "they too can be an astronaut and president." (emphasis mine). I can't say I disagree that the custom of "everyone [is] number one" is rather stupid. In my experience, it tends to lead to the entitlement mentality which, again, tends to lead to individuals who think that they "ARE going to be an astronaut or President" just because that's what they think they want. Forget that people have to work hard to do these things, people have the mentality that it's their right.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    35. Re:There must be a winner by dcollins · · Score: 2

      "On that note, isn't that the American spirit? That everyone has an equal opportunity to rise to the top, proportional to your efforts, and there is no zero-sum game?"

      How could you possibly think such a thing? America is fundamentally about classical-mercantile business expansion and profiteering/exploitation. "The business of America is business", etc. It's one in which inequality between winners and losers expands over time. It's a culture based on the lottery.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    36. Re:There must be a winner by Megane · · Score: 2

      And furthermore, in America there must be only one single winner in everything. You are never allowed to have multiple people complete some challenge and share in the victory.

      You know, that's one of the things I like about anything with Gordon Ramsay in it. He's willing to declare double winners and double losers if he thinks the competitors deserve it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    37. Re:There must be a winner by MaWeiTao · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're right... But it isn't that simple.

      Japanese go in with more realistic expectations. They know they might not win, but their give it their all anyway.

      Americans, on the other hand, are all taught they're special, that they're all destined for greatness. So they bank everything on that expectation of greatness and then come out the other side bitter because they couldn't achieve it. It's strongly reflected in entitlement mentality.

      These divergent attitudes make for a difference in how the two cultures approach life. Japanese, like most Asians, will take the more pragmatic approach to life. Americans, especially the youth, have the unrealistic expectation that you can have your cake and eat it too, that you can do something fun, hip and exciting AND earn a great living doing it.

      And of course it's popular culture is responsible for perpetuating these expectations. In American movies the hard-working individual is depicted has having a dysfunctional life and the freeloading slacker is the sage who's got it all figured out. This attitude is virtually non-existent in Japanese film. So then you've got American game shows that glorify the victory and present the challenge as almost a footnote. And when conflict is present, it's depicted in the standard, cartoonish, us-versus them manner. Think American Gladiator.

      Now, the nice thing about the American philosophy is that people will strive for greatness, at least, when they don't believe they're entitled to it. They're less likely to be unquestioning drones.

      On the other hand, the Japanese approach leads to more productivity and less resentment. People have a more realistic outlook.

    38. Re:There must be a winner by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Well if you tell a class sized amount of people that they can be presidents of the united states if they dream big and work hard you're bullshitting them - or they'll have to live really long lives.

      It's just about choosing what they're told, bullshitting isn't very encouraging in the long run, it's like the president visiting both football teams locker rooms and saying "you guys are the best so you're going to win!".

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    39. Re:There must be a winner by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      The linked article notes that this is also practiced in North Carolina, which is even more disturbing.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    40. Re:There must be a winner by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Especially on Ninja Warrior. Part of what I like about the show is that, goddamnit, I'm amazed people can do any of that stuff. It's not the same as kids getting a trophy for participating. It's giving someone credit for being a badass, even if they aren't the baddest ass in the room.

    41. Re:There must be a winner by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      Ayako is complete bad ass. She pretty much wipes everyone off the screen.

      That said, I much prefer the eye candy of Komiya and Mikie.

      Or Mai Nadaska (who never competed but is fantastic eye candy nonetheless).

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    42. Re:There must be a winner by Evil.Bonsai · · Score: 1

      I don't know....soiled panties would've been my guess.

    43. Re:There must be a winner by sarysa · · Score: 1

      No pictures though. Doesn't NSFW require graphic pictures? (usually audio is even work-safe as most people use headphones, though I say "audio NSFW" just in case)

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    44. Re:There must be a winner by poity · · Score: 1

      I had to go on Youtube to watch both versions since I've never seen either. I have to agree with you, but I also think you and the author missed something glaringly obvious -- there's no humor in the American version. ANW is just too serious, or takes itself too seriously. This is also manifest in the obstacles themselves -- whereas come Sasuke obstacles are there just to put the challenger in silly compromising poses for a laugh, the ANW obstacles are all there anticipating feats of strength and agility. The result of this is that, while for Sasuke contestants the entire obstacle course is part challenge/part elaborate practical joke, for ANW contestants it's pure challenge, and egos are on the line. Couple this with the American propensity for gratuitous displays of machismo and ANW becomes do-or-die-to-prove-yourself-to-spectators, which saps all the fun out of the original.

      So, in summary:
      Sasuke = animal circus using people
      American Ninja Warrior = gym class

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    45. Re:There must be a winner by poity · · Score: 1

      whereas *some Sasuke obstacles

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    46. Re:There must be a winner by localman57 · · Score: 2

      NSFW to me, means my boss walks by and sees what I'm looking at. If I don't want to talk about it (as in this case), its NSFW.

    47. Re:There must be a winner by Igot1forya · · Score: 1

      So you're saying a vending machine that dispenses used women's panties creepy? What is this world coming to?

      --
      -------- -1 for SUCK IT!
    48. Re:There must be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Japan does have a winner-first mentality too, and it's even worse than the US."

      Yes, but the main point on Sasuke is that they are competing against the course, not against each other. 2 people winning means they are both celebrated, not that one has to be knocked out so that there is only one winner. I remember watching it when I had cable and can truly say that, each time more than one person made it to the final obstacle, I was rooting for them both to succeed, not just one person. If they changed that with American Ninja Warrior, they kind of missed the point.

    49. Re:There must be a winner by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Teaching kids that they CAN become president or an astronaut is fine AS LONG AS YOU ARE CLEAR that it requires the following:

      1) Dedicate every waking moment to the absolutely relentless pursuit of the goal

      2) If you screw up badly, possibly even once, you will likely never reach this goal

      There is a huge difference between "Little Timmy, if you focus every ounce of your being toward this goal and work relentlessly, you do have the opportunity to achieve it." and the more common "Little Timmy, you're going to be an astronaut, all you need is to have super big dreams!"

      When given a test (it doesn't matter what type), American teenagers score in the middle of the pack amongst other nations, yet they CONSISTENTLY rate their own performance far higher than they deserve and far higher than any other nation. They are also one of the few groups of kids who almost always rate their own performance far higher than it actually was.

      The conclusion is that America has an excess of self-esteem and self-delusion and perhaps could use a little humility, culturally.

    50. Re:There must be a winner by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if nobody ever actually won? (as in this show)

      Then it seems pretty clear that it's not a problem to praise everyone's effort.

      But when someone actually does win, they are vaulted to "national hero" status. That's pretty cool.

      Imagine, in "Kiddie sports", if the undefeated team was told they were heros and all the other kids weren't.

      Here lies the difference. Holding up someone's effort (yet recognizing they didn't meet the goal) is valueable, provided there is the chance of meeting the goal and being much more highly praised. Treating everyone exactly the same "Everyone is a winner" is silly, but praising people who fall short of a nearly impossible goal isn't bad, especially when most people couldn't even take 3 steps on that course without hurting themselves, so we're not talking about "everyone" who steps onto the course.

    51. Re:There must be a winner by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      Wait, only about 1% of the population could set foot on the first obstacle without being physically injured. Have you even seen the course?

      Simply attempting that course is a bit akin to admitting to a national audience that you (and the producers) think you might actually be athletic enough to conquer this course. That's pretty remarkable to begin with (like top 1%).

      To make it to the second or third obstacle is a 0.001% sort of thing and is very celebrated, even if they didn't "win".

      For you to equate this to 3rd grade "coddling" in an attempt at some sort of weird nationalistic outburst is both inane and silly.

      But, nice, try, you'll get it next time... if you dream big enough. :-P

    52. Re:There must be a winner by judoguy · · Score: 1

      I've spent about half my life studying judo. Try telling a Japanese judoka it's good enough just to try really hard. "It's OK Yoko, that Korean/American/Russian was just better than you." There can be only one winner in a division and trying hard ain't good enough.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    53. Re:There must be a winner by dthx1138 · · Score: 1

      The GP was implying that we tell every kid they are going to be successful in life because they're special. I've never heard an educator of any kind give that impression. The message was always that there are no pre-imposed limits to what you can do.

      What's the point of telling a class of third graders that, well, statistically it is highly unlikely that any of you will be astronauts one day, so you shouldn't bother making that a goal?

      You really think kids are dropping out of high school at 16 because they have an entitlement mentality? They're mad that they haven't already been hired by NASA? No. Kids drop out because they've been given the impression that they can't succeed in society even if they try, so, they shouldn't even bother.

      --
      I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
    54. Re:There must be a winner by gknoy · · Score: 2

      I disagree. Because there is never a guarantee of a winner (unlike Survivor), and quite often only 1-2 people make it to the final round (and then both fail), everyone going in is hopeful that they will conquer it. The competition is merely in terms of who can overcome the challenges faster... if at all. That "at all", and the fact that often the course is Too Hard, means that it really is a test of true athleticism. You're right that they are friends, but I don't think that colors their attitudes as much as you appear to think. If you or I were to make it three rounds in and then have a heartbreakingly close failure on the final round, I suspect we'd get the same condolences, and would get the same accolades if we won.

      I've never actually seen two people complete the same course. I've seen at least one time when both remaining competitors were less than a second away from completing it.

      God, this makes me want to watch the show, now. It's both inspiring to see these people do it, and frustrating when I realize that I'll never devote my life to that pursuit as tirelessly as they do.

    55. Re:There must be a winner by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Too many people think that when they dream big and work hard that they WILL be an astronaut or president. Like hard work should result in their goal, regardless of how many other people demand that same limited position.

    56. Re:There must be a winner by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      whereas come Sasuke obstacles are there just to put the challenger in silly compromising poses for a laugh....while for Sasuke contestants the entire obstacle course is part challenge/part elaborate practical joke...Sasuke = animal circus using people

      Are you sure you watched Sasuke and not Tashiki's Castle? There's almost nothing silly or circus-like in Sasuke. About the closest you'll maybe get is the rolling escargo, but even that would be a bit of a stretch.

    57. Re:There must be a winner by Atzanteol · · Score: 2

      They have beer vending machines though...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    58. Re:There must be a winner by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      We tell them that they CAN BE if they dream big and work hard.

      And that is the American Dream, called so because you only can believe in it when you are asleep. Just to invoke Carlin.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    59. Re:There must be a winner by jandrese · · Score: 3

      It's right out of the Reality TV Bible. Despite the relatively low production costs, there is still a lot of hand wringing over the success of any particular show, so producers feel forced to inject "drama" regardless of the actual situation. It drives me nuts when you have shows with otherwise interesting premises like Project Runway or Face Off that have an opportunity to show creative people doing interesting things, and instead spend most of their time playing up some off-hand remark and cutting away to the confession camera to learn just how much someone's feelings were hurt and how their mother really wants them to succeed because blah blah blah.

      It's like they're all edited by gossipy Jr. High school girls.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    60. Re:There must be a winner by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget Sara Jean Underwood.

      No, I can safely say that that will not be a problem. *drool*

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    61. Re:There must be a winner by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      How could you possibly think such a thing? America is fundamentally about classical-mercantile business expansion and profiteering/exploitation. "The business of America is business", etc. It's one in which inequality between winners and losers expands over time. It's a culture based on the lottery.

      I disagree. The idea of behind these United States of America is that everyone has equal opportunity to succeed. I've seen many examples of people succeeding that was something other than financial. If you only consider successful people in financial terms then you set up a test condition that assumes that the environment is "fundamentally about classical-mercantile business expansion and profiteering/exploitation". This is a false premise.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    62. Re:There must be a winner by clintp · · Score: 1

      [...] On that note, isn't that the American spirit? That everyone has an equal opportunity to rise to the top, proportional to your efforts, and there is no zero-sum game?

      Proportional to your efforts ... and your talents. That last bit is oftentimes just as important as your efforts, and brushed aside by those that think that all men/people really are equal in every way. No matter how hard I try, I can never be a top marathon runner -- my physiology just doesn't allow for it.

      Luck doesn't hurt either.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    63. Re:There must be a winner by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      No, and it never has been. Trying your best isn't economical.

      Which brings us to the subject of bankruptcy. It used to be the tool used mainly by entrepreneurs as a safety net when a business idea fails. Now it is used mainly as a safety net for consumerism. While the majority of bankruptcies are done by people who used to afford the loan but lost their job, lately we seen a rise in bankruptcy due to people getting a loan that they never really could afford.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    64. Re:There must be a winner by AmbushBug · · Score: 1

      Haha, also known as One Thousand Years of Death in Naruto!

    65. Re:There must be a winner by tilante · · Score: 1

      This, however, is only able to happen because of banks approving people who couldn't afford the loan. The bank is the business -- it's supposed to be the bank's job to be careful about whom they loan money. Upon the realization that the Fed would simply bail them out if they made too many bad loans, the big banks decided to take greater risks.

      If the banks had to actually bear responsibility for their poor lending choices, you'd see it become much harder for people to get loans they can't actually afford. On the flip side, if the banks could no longer get bailouts or borrow money from the government at extremely low rates, they might return to paying decent interest rates on CDs, savings accounts, etc. As it stands, they don't need to compete to get *your* money when the Fed will give them money so easily.

    66. Re:There must be a winner by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem is not the lofty aspiration but the fact that anyone who fails to achieve it is a loser. There is actually nothing wrong with doing a job you enjoy and living a good life without making a fortune as an entrepreneur or top sports person or president.

      The "winner takes all" attitude is the problem. You don't have to aim for the top either, just being good at something you enjoy or having a family or living a good life are just as worthy and rewarding goals.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    67. Re:There must be a winner by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      1) Dedicate every waking moment to the absolutely relentless pursuit of the goal

      2) If you screw up badly, possibly even once, you will likely never reach this goal

      3) Be born into the right family

      Social mobility is in decline.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    68. Re:There must be a winner by mattack2 · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's "upon the realization that the Fed would simply bail them put"... it's the fact that the banks making the loans THEN DIDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO keep the loans.

      Basically, I loan you $10. So, obviously you owe me $10 (+ interest). But I then sold your loan to Fred for $10.50 (I presume that's much less than the interest I would have made had I held the loan all along, but still more than the original loan amount). So now you really owe the money to Fred, but don't know it. So now you don't pay, and Fred is the one that gets screwed, but the bank is still happy because it made its money.

    69. Re:There must be a winner by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      Um, if the economy were a zero-sum game we wouldn't be seeing GDP going up every year, and society continually becoming richer and better off than previous generations.

      Voluntary exchange and profit by definition is a positive-sum game.

    70. Re:There must be a winner by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      "In American movies the hard-working individual is depicted has having a dysfunctional life and the freeloading slacker is the sage who's got it all figured out. This attitude is virtually non-existent in Japanese film."

      Have you ever even heard of "anime"?

    71. Re:There must be a winner by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

      Very true. I once went to a Japanese school on a sports day. In the races there would be smaller kids lagging behind, but everyone - the crowd and their classmates who had finished - would cheer them on: 'ganbatte!' - 'do your best!'. Compare that to the Western schools where the winner gets all the glory and the last kid is teased as a loser.

    72. Re:There must be a winner by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      when i was in college, i tried REALLY HARD (seriously) in one of my later math courses. i did all the optional homeworks, studied, worked with the professor after class... and got an F.
      i suck at that level of math and despite my best efforts i couldnt develop that skill necessary for the field i had chosen to pursue (computer engineer). armed with that knowledge, i chose another major. i imagine my career would be very short if i were unable to grasp basic concepts of my job, or not able to get a job at all if my professor had thought i deserved to pass his class because i had tried hard despite not understanding the subject.

      there can be value in failure, and kids should learn that lesson sooner than later.

    73. Re:There must be a winner by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's quite different. There's a difference between celebrating someone doing their best (no matter the outcome) and pretending they won when they did not. It's especially different from calling someone a winner when they were phoning it in.

    74. Re:There must be a winner by sjames · · Score: 2

      The conclusion is that America has an excess of self-esteem and self-delusion and perhaps could use a little humility, culturally.

      The latter, certainly. The former is about half a bubble off. I would say the problem is that self esteem is tied too closely with being the best at everything. The fact is, a person who is middle of the pack but can be counted on for a good effort has nothing to be ashamed of. If they excel in some little thing, that much the better. There is no need to be the very best at every little thing just to feel OK about yourself.

    75. Re:There must be a winner by sjames · · Score: 2

      I think it's fair to say the crack head isn't giving it his best effort, so no celebration there. But the guy next door who is unemployed 80% of the time but rather than giving up and smoking crack keeps looking for work? I wouldn't say he's winning but I would say his effort is worthy of praise. He's not a 'loser' even if he's losing.

    76. Re:There must be a winner by AssholeMcGee+ · · Score: 1

      THe only difference is the Japanese competitors are all of varying backgrounds they are normal everyday people anyone of these competitors can win or move on, they take it serious in some cases because that is part of there culture, the unique characters of the people in most cases would be considered insane in the US .. The US competitors look like idiots who spend more time in gym or in there basement gym more worried about how they look on TV then they do actually competing on a game show.. The set-up of the stages or the entire course is extremely difficult, the American version to coin an internet meme, is gay.. American TV has never come up with anything original so why start now, they always kill off a good thing. I would love to see more of the Japanese Game shows shown in the US, I would agree the Japanese version is the best, and I have watched it since it was first on G4TV.. And to be honest NBC are nothing but morons like all the other Broadcasting Corps, they would have done the show justice if they aired the Japanese version, on there crap network, instead of trying to create a lame ass version.. US TV can do whatever they want to try and make the American version popular, but like the American Gladiators it is not very interesting to watch.

    77. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Um, we don't tell every kid that they ARE going to be an astronaut or President. We tell them that they CAN BE if they dream big and work hard.

      And that's simply not true.

      To take the obvious case, if you don't have perfect vision, excellent physical health and at least average intelligence, you are not going to become an Air Force pilot and then astronaut.

      And during your whole lifetime, there are (say) fifteen different people who will become President. There are a lot more people who are big lottery winners than that.

      There's nothing wrong with encouraging ambition, but it has to be tempered with some realism. Otherwise people get needlessly disappointed with life.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    78. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What's the point of telling a class of third graders that, well, statistically it is highly unlikely that any of you will be astronauts one day, so you shouldn't bother making that a goal?

      Because it's the truth?

      What you should be telling them is that there are a lot of interesting things they can do in their lives, and that the secret of success and happiness is to achieve self-actualisation, not mould yourself to some externally imposed ideal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    79. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There is no need to be the very best at every little thing just to feel OK about yourself.

      There is no WAY to be the very best at every little thing.

      As Chesterton said, if a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing badly

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    80. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Too many people think that when they dream big and work hard that they WILL be an astronaut or president. Like hard work should result in their goal, regardless of how many other people demand that same limited position.

      Dreming big is easy, working hard less so, but actually achieving anything requires a lot more luck than people like to admit.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    81. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The goal of Socialism is not to make everyone equal in the sense of being exactly the same. That is simply a right wing caricature.

      The truth is that Socialism aims for something like Iain M Banks's Culture, or the society in Star Trek. where everyone has all the food, material goods and so on that they need, and they are free to pursue whatever interests, hobbies or careers take their fancy. In other words, everyone lives like an aristocrat of three hundred years ago.

      Although this would seem to require access to almost unlimited cheap/free energy and resources, it doesn't mean it's a bad thing to aim for.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    82. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Um, if the economy were a zero-sum game we wouldn't be seeing GDP going up every year, and society continually becoming richer and better off than previous generations.

      Voluntary exchange and profit by definition is a positive-sum game.

      Thr point is that if GDP keeps going up, then everyone should benefit from it, not just the rich few at the top. It makes no practical difference to someone whether they have ten or eleven billion dollars, so they should be paying it in tax back into the common kitty.

      Yes, that's redistributive socialism.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    83. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Proportional to your efforts ... and your talents. That last bit is oftentimes just as important as your efforts, and brushed aside by those that think that all men/people really are equal in every way. No matter how hard I try, I can never be a top marathon runner -- my physiology just doesn't allow for it.

      But that's only a problem if you live in a society where top marathon runners get all the best of everything.

      Whereas, in fact, you live in a society where the top psycopaths and money-lovers get the best of evrything. And the main talent you need for that is unscrupulousness.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    84. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My opinion is that removing competition also removes the drive to succeed for a number of people

      Most worthwhile things are worthwhile in themselves, not because you can do them better than someone else. The only important competition is the one with yourself, to do the best you can.

      At school, when I got top marks in an exam, I was happy because I had done well, not because other people hadn't. There is a difference.

      In an external competition, all that matters is the result, which is why people cheat in exams, exhaust themselves with over-work, stab allies in the back and so on. My view that any prize won like that isn't worth winning, buit I know that's not a popular view nowadays.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    85. Re:There must be a winner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      shows with otherwise interesting premises like Project Runway or Face Off

      Project Runway is cool (in a fierce way) but do you really have a show where two people have to swap faces like Travolta and Cage?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    86. Re:There must be a winner by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      Thr point is that if GDP keeps going up, then everyone should benefit from it, not just the rich few at the top. It makes no practical difference to someone whether they have ten or eleven billion dollars, so they should be paying it in tax back into the common kitty.

      Yes, that's redistributive socialism.

      Yeah it does make a difference, otherwise they wouldn't continue to seek profit, and continue to invest in new ventures.

      By almost every factor imaginable (nutrition, education, health, war, leisure time), society, the average person, the median person, almost every single last person on the planet is better off than ever in history. Fewer people are dying now than any time in recorded history. Not percent, fewer total people. So don't give me this "poor are getting poorer" nonsense.

    87. Re:There must be a winner by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is no WAY to be the very best at every little thing.

      Exactly, and that's why our current societal attitudes are unsustainable. Self delusion only goes so far.

    88. Re:There must be a winner by sjames · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it, that's not too surprising. By handing out the accolades for 'winning' (even when you lose) they teach that winning is everything. Meanwhile, the students know they didn't actually win and by extension that if anyone wakes up and realizes it they will lose face.

      I would much rather see educators encourage students to give it their best and to give them accolades for THAT specifically. Let them learn that the honor is in the effort and that sometimes that effort leads to a win. It would seem that first, the educators themselves need to learn that.

    89. Re:There must be a winner by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I have never seen more than one person ever complete the entire course in the same competition, so I didn't know that. Thanks for the clarification!

  2. See also: American Top Gear by edremy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or rather, don't. Seriously, don't.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:See also: American Top Gear by ameen.ross · · Score: 1

      Which brings to mind the issue that Top Gear has been shelved until 2013! Bastards...

      --
      $(echo cm0gLXJmIC8= | base64 --decode)
    2. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I tried - once - never again.. that show is horrible.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      We still get a christmas special thankfully.

    4. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Serious question: Do Americans like it...?

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Happens all of the time, there's even a TV show about recreating foreign TV shows for American audiences.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:See also: American Top Gear by TheTerseOne · · Score: 1

      None that I know of. But then those that I have talked to about it are all fans of the original. I can't speak for anyone who just stumbled across it while channel surfing. I sincerely doubt anyone has ever called the US Version "The greatest show on Television," which I have heard several people say about the original Top Gear.

      --
      "Newspapers: A tiny little part of the internet, printed out yesterday, and delivered to your house"
    7. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't like either.

    8. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really bother me. Top Gear has gotten a bit tired and predictable. Take some time off, think of some actual new stuff, and get back to the roots - go back to being try'shardbutshite instead of ohwe'vegototoplasttimesowe'llrigandstagethingsveryobviously.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    9. Re:See also: American Top Gear by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      How you smellin'?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    10. Re:See also: American Top Gear by MisterZimbu · · Score: 2

      I like it. And I like Top Gear UK too.

      Season 1 was pretty bad, specifically because they tried to mimic the UK version, which they couldn't because the just didn't have the rapport of the UK cast.

      The latter seasons are much more watchable because they've now went and put a more American spin on it. It's pretty much weighted more heavily towards the cheap car challenges and the studios are nothing more than a backdrop. While there are still segments that I fast forward through (the SIARPC, for instance, which I skip on the UK version too), overall I think it's on par with, if not better than, the recent Top Gear UK episodes (although the last UK series was actually fantastic).

      Overall, when you recreate a show internationally, you'll have to "Americanize" some of it to get it to stick. The relatively small cultural gap between the UK and US requires this, let alone an immense one like there is between the US and Japan.

      While ANW isn't great, I understand some of the Americanizations that were done to it. Carrying it over wholesale from Japan, format and all, would have made it so much worse.

    11. Re:See also: American Top Gear by ildon · · Score: 1

      The first half of the first season was pretty painful, but it's improved a lot. Still not up to the quality of the UK one, but it's at least relatively enjoyable to watch. Better than most of the shit on TV, at least.

    12. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      You never saw the Australian version

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    13. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i didn't know they had an Australian version - the fact that it exists makes me want to try to find it and try to watch it once.. just to see if its so bad its funny.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    14. Re:See also: American Top Gear by jandrese · · Score: 1

      None that I've met so far.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    15. Re:See also: American Top Gear by edremy · · Score: 1
      One amusing bit-they had a competition between the British and Aussie Top Gear presenters. When they first did it with the German cast, they had a race where they welded two cars on top of each other- the top could steer, the bottom had the gas and brakes. For the Aussie show, the British presenters helpfully set up the same challenge, with the second Aussie car welded on upside down so they'd feel at home. This worked as well as you might expect.

      The Aussie Stig also arrived in a shipping crate, upside down.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    16. Re:See also: American Top Gear by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i saw the German one.. i'll have to find that Aussie one

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  3. What's Wrong With Slashdot? by arosas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ~800 word reviews about "American Ninja Warrior".

    1. Re:What's Wrong With Slashdot? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That don't even really review the subject. Also, how about we don't watch the channel that gutted TechTV.

    2. Re:What's Wrong With Slashdot? by c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amen.

      All we really needed was "American Ninja Warrior", "Hollywood", and "non-fiction". The other 795 words was just a demonstration of what happens when someone can't find the stairs out of their parents basement.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:What's Wrong With Slashdot? by gman003 · · Score: 2

      I actually liked this article .

      It's news for nerds. Can't argue with that. Sure, it's about something most commonly enjoyed by the lower nerd castes, but it insulted G4 enough to definitely not be an advertisement.

      It's the exact opposite of the most widely-derided trend on Slashdot - bad editing. It's *all* editing. It's the sort of investigative journalism /. needs more of. Sure, it's a bit of a rocky start, but I'd definitely rather see more stuff like this than more "the GUBMINT be taken our FREEDOMS!", [company]-bashing, and repetitive {bitcoin|raspberry pi|kickstarter} posts we've been complaining about.

  4. Actual critique: 10% by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is mostly a disturbingly obsessive whine over details that do not matter, with an actual critique only making up a fraction of the last couple paragraphs. It uses 500 words to lodge exactly two valid complaints:
    1. Making a competition out of a challenge, which are fundamentally different.
    and
    2. Slightly increasing the proportion of the show that is human interest.

    If there were some sort of news that made this arbitrary blob of complaining relevant, it would just be badly written, instead of bizarrely atopical and badly written. There's not, and it just seems like completely off the wall "nerd-rage" over nothing in particular. Shameful editorial standards at work here.

    1. Re:Actual critique: 10% by CaseCrash · · Score: 1

      Totally agree.
      I mean, WTF is this? It seems like a blog entry from a blog I would never ever read, not a slashdot news item. I usually get pissed at all the "How is this news for nerds?" comments on stories that aren't all that slashdotty, but this isn't even news. The book reviews actually review something, this is just one guy who really wants to bitch about something but can't seem to find anyone to care so he's trying with us.

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
    2. Re:Actual critique: 10% by Provos · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like the American Ninja Warrior of critiques.

      --
      I toggled a toggle and buttoned a button, but when I got done, I was done doin' nothin'.
    3. Re:Actual critique: 10% by RabidTimmy · · Score: 1

      Ahh, critiquing the critique. I see what you did there. Now for my critique of your critique of the Ninja Warrior critique...

    4. Re:Actual critique: 10% by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whats worse, I think he missed out on the most shameful part of what is wrong with the show. And that is, in making the show AMERICAN Ninja Warrior, they've excluded everyone who is not an American.

      It was very gracious of the Japanese to let anyone compete. They even gave the Americans the privilege of skipping out on the initial qualifying course (which is never televised but takes place behind the scenes) to guarantee them 10 spots on the show. But now that we're apparently taking over the show (the production company for Sasuke went bankrupt, and at least for now it appears there will be no more seasons of the show), we've kicked all of them out and they no longer get a chance to compete. That's just crap. Former Susuke champion Makoto Nagano even flew in to witness the ANW finals, but of course he doesn't get to compete.

    5. Re:Actual critique: 10% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now for my critique of your critique of the Ninja Warrior critique...

      I've seen better. For one, your critique of his critique of the critique in the summary is more just implied rather than explicit. Since I only have an implied critique critique critique, I must assume it follows the standard Slashdot tropes. Therefore, I can accuse you with 78% certainty of using a poorly thought out straw car anology coupled with a misunderstanding of the "No True Car Anology" fallicy. (or vagina)

    6. Re:Actual critique: 10% by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      The "human interest" element is something that annoys me the most. I have never seen American Ninja Warrior, but "human interest" seems to dominate 90% of all non-fiction TV programs these days. And even fiction, if you consider shows like "LOST" that when on and on about every characters' past life and only five minutes of action the island. Then the character eventually died without ever resolving the deep personal issues that the show kept exploring. I'm glad I stopped watching LOST somewhere after the first season. I would catch a show two or three times a year, but I couldn't get back into it. I did watch the final, which really made me glad that I didn't invest too much time into the show.

      But what annoys me the most is that the History channel, Discovery, and many other cable TV programs used to have documentaries and very interesting and informative programming. Now everything is a reality show that is 90% "human interest". You think you're watching a show about how to fix something, how certain products are made, or how to run a business, but then you come to the realization that the whole show is just about the social interaction of the "reality" characters. Most of the time is spent catching someone in a fit of wage or a camera that follows someone crying after their feelings are hurt. It may be hard to imagine, but I've lived from 2009 to just last month without cable TV, but the crap that is on nowadays makes me wonder if I should just cancel and forget about TV altogether.

    7. Re:Actual critique: 10% by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Whats worse, I think he missed out on the most shameful part of what is wrong with the show. And that is, in making the show AMERICAN Ninja Warrior, they've excluded everyone who is not an American.

      You are projecting. "American" mean held in the US in this context. Anything else is your own projection. It wouldn't bother me if every transplanted show prefixed their country name (or informal name as concerns "American") before the title. This leads to disambiguity which is a good thing. "Ninja Warrior" is the poorly translated version of a Japanese show/contest/challenge. "American Ninja Warrior" is that poorly translated show transplanted and reworked - however poorly.

      If you read the review, the name is the least of his concerns. Why is it your greatest?

      I'm projecting, huh? You don't think there is a restriction that you have to be american? OK, well then please explain the terms that were listed for the tryouts:
      http://freecastingcall.com/casting-calls-and-auditions-in-hollywood-ca/g4-network-is-seeking-contestants-for-american-ninja-warrior.html

      Here, now, the rules:
      You must be an American citizen or resident over the age of 21 to try out

      Oh hey, look at that. I didn't even have to make it past the first rule in the list. But I suppose that's good news for all of the Americans in Japan who are neither American citizens nor residents.

    8. Re:Actual critique: 10% by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about? Who gives a shit about MTV2 Celebrity or Wipeout or whatever else? You've completely missed the point. The point is, for 27 seasons (13 years) the producers of Sasuke have made the show open to everyone from every country. Anyone that wanted a shot could show up and get an opportunity to be on the show. And that's exactly what you got. Over those 27 seasons, I've seen competitors from at least a dozen different countries take a shot at it. Now we get a chance to host the show and we add the rule that you have to be American to compete? Sorry, but that's bullshit.

      Geesh, you don't need to be an American.

      Really? You must not understand what "You must be an American citizen or resident over the age of 21 to try out" means. And again, the Japanese never made you become a Japanese citizen or resident to get on the show.. You show up, you run the qualifying course, and if you rank high enough you are on the show.

  5. A guess? It's designed for idiots. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've not seen American Ninja Warrior, but the vast majority of American remakes of popular import shows get the same treatment. First, you start of with something that's popular. Then you assume that Americans are too stupid to understand any culture other than the perfectly homogenised average of the USA as portrayed by Hollywood. Then you remove everything that doesn't conform to this. And then you end up with something that even the target audience thinks is dumb.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. what's wrong? by kontos · · Score: 1

    So, basically, you're upset that an Americanized foreign show has been Americanized?

    --
    SM MBL-VIR looking 4 SIG 4 LTR. must be DDF, no 420, SD ok.
    1. Re:what's wrong? by ildon · · Score: 1

      What's wrong is that the original audience was a niche audience and not a mass market audience. They liked it for its bizarre quirks as much as its content (perhaps more so). The bizarre quirks were smoothed over in favor of mass market appeal (because why would they spend all this money to produce a show for a niche audience rather than the more lucrative mass market?) and this alienated the original audience, surprising no one with half a brain.

      This same thing happened with Iron Chef and Takeshi's Castle. Fans of the original simply should not have gotten their hopes up.

    2. Re:what's wrong? by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fans of the original simply should not have gotten their hopes up.

      Fans of the original never had hopes for this version - as you said, the core group that loved the original knew from the start that the american version would be an abortion. Late comers, God bless them, might like the new, watered down version, because ignorance is bliss.

      I find it absolutely entertaining to see how poorly a marketer or television guru can do when given enough time and money. Hell, I could rip off a show from another country and do it terribly. Where's my paycheck?

      And I LOVED the "most extreme elimination challenge" version of Takeshi's Castle. I don't care how far off it was. I fucking loved that show. Guy LeDouche was my favorite 'character' of any show, ever.

    3. Re:what's wrong? by ildon · · Score: 1

      I meant the episode of MXC they filmed in the U.S. at Universal Orlando. It was pretty terrible. I only even used the Takeshi's Castle name because offhand I couldn't remember the name of the American show without looking it up.

    4. Re:what's wrong? by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      I even torrented those shows so I could go back to them and pretend they were a new show. What really killed me was that the commentators assigned some kind of sexual reference to every move the contestants made.

    5. Re:what's wrong? by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 1

      I also loved Takeshi's Castle -- even the Americanized, somewhat watered-down, full-of-corny-jokes version. If they replaced all the reality shows with Japanese knock-offs, TV would be 100% more entertaining. At least I might watch a few more shows than I do now. Now I just get ill flipping past the shows, let alone trying to watch them.

  7. It's like Godzilla by medv4380 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I prefer the clearly dubbed versions of Godzilla to anything made to "resemble" Godzilla. G4s version of Ninja Warrior holds onto the same cheezy camp that makes a Godzilla Dub intriguing. The "American" Ninja Warrior doesn't hold the same level of camp that only can be done via a dub. Maybe if they took American Ninja Warrior and dubbed it in Japanese they would be able to enjoy the same level of camp we do with Sasuke.

    1. Re:It's like Godzilla by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Did you even watch the same dubbed Ninja Warrior that I did?? Sure some of it had slapstick, because occasionally people would compete (for lulz) in a tuxedo or something, but once things got serious (or the serious competitors were on) I can't think of anything slapstick about it. Wipe-out vs Ninja Warrior is like comparing Jersey Shore to the Seven Samurai.

    2. Re:It's like Godzilla by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      To anyone who thinks a Japanese Game Show is "serious" needs to get their head examined, and as a Therapy I suggest actually signing up for a few of them. I'm sure that will fix your point of view.

  8. "Human Interest bloat..." by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> ""American Ninja Warrior" — the strictly-domestic production — suffers badly from human interest bloat. The Japanese program (at least as it is presented on G4) frequently features mini-portraits of the competitors, but these segments are very short — typically under 20 seconds — and they help to put a human face on the often-superhuman efforts of the program's contenders. "

    Oh, just wait until the Olympics. They will do lengthy segments that try to ferret out the most painful moments in every athlete's life (with soft piano music) so the audience can have a little Rocky moment when an athlete wins an event.

    1. Re:"Human Interest bloat..." by swillden · · Score: 2

      >> ""American Ninja Warrior" — the strictly-domestic production — suffers badly from human interest bloat. The Japanese program (at least as it is presented on G4) frequently features mini-portraits of the competitors, but these segments are very short — typically under 20 seconds — and they help to put a human face on the often-superhuman efforts of the program's contenders. "

      Oh, just wait until the Olympics. They will do lengthy segments that try to ferret out the most painful moments in every athlete's life (with soft piano music) so the audience can have a little Rocky moment when an athlete wins an event.

      What's really sad is that I really doubt that this is because the broadcasters are stupid or uninformed. They push this glurge because it actually appeals to a sufficiently-large segment of their audience.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:"Human Interest bloat..." by Thatto · · Score: 1

      Indeed. What I find aggravating is that they show these human interest stories for people that fail. And don't show the successful contestants.

  9. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    His hair was perfect.

  10. Easy answer by Perldivr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Japanese version does not insult the viewers intelligence. The American version does.

    1. Re:Easy answer by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The Japanese version does not insult the viewers intelligence. American viewers don't have any."

      FTFY

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  11. That was not the final broadcast by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are two more episods in the July 9th episode, they only did the first stage of Mount Midoriyama.

    I do agree that the American show emphasizes competition against each other with the line "who will be the first" instead of "will anyone".

    But I do have to ask, how on-point can a review be if the reviewer didn't even watch the show enough to notice it didn't actually go to the end?

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:That was not the final broadcast by heathen_01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are two more episods in the July 9th episode, they only did the first stage of Mount Midoriyama.

      I do agree that the American show emphasizes competition against each other with the line "who will be the first" instead of "will anyone".

      But I do have to ask, how on-point can a review be if the reviewer didn't even watch the show enough to notice it didn't actually go to the end?

      You're just trying to piss of the reviewer now aren't you.

  12. Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nearly every japanese show that is rellocalized in the US does the exact same thing. Chances are it will bomb or quickly be retooled, (to go on to very modest success). They have trouble understanding that the fans of the original show actually like the show as-is.

    It's like the difference between Chef Ramses UK and US Kitchen Nightmares. They are essentially the same show, but in the US version they add dramatic music and minimize their portrayal of the team building exercises, (making it seem more like a battle then his genuinely trying to help the restaurant achieve greatness; and they seem to go looking for the most combatative restaurant owners they can find).

  13. Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In England there's a hill called Torpenhow Hill. The first mapmakers asked the locals what they called it, and the locals said "Tor", which meant "hill" in the old language. The newcomers spoke a different language, and so they named it "Tor Pen," adding a suffix which meant hill in their own tongue. Few centuries go by, new mapmakers come around speaking Old English, which uses the word "How" for "hill." "Tor Pen, you say? Okay Torpen How it is!"
    Finally modern English maps are made and this time they contract "Torpen How" into "Torpenhow" and add "Hill".

      So the name of the place, translated into English, is "Hill-hill-hill hill." How's that for silliness?

  14. i was a fan of the original japanese iron chef by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Chef

    And then they bought it to the USA, with William Shatner, and it completely and utterly sucked:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Chef_USA

    The point is, the TONE was off, it was like drunk golf buddies who stumbled on a casual cooking competition, no reverence for the food, no care for the technique. Much like American Ninja warrior: wrong tone, just as you say.

    Luckily, the Food Network made another stab at Iron Chef, and this time it worked, with Alton Brown and the "nephew" of the original Chairman Kaga (Hawaiian Fillipino martial artist Mark Dacascos), and other cross overs like Iron Chef Morimoto:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Chef_America

    Not as delightful as the original, but it works, it is enjoyable to watch, because the TONE is the same: they really care about the food, and they really pay attention to the cooking and technique.

    If something works, don't mess with it!

    I am certain some useless Hollywood suit said you need to change Sasuke to suit American audiences. Rightfully, that suit should be fired. If the formula works, don't mess with it, or you have some stillborn mess no one wants to watch.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i was a fan of the original japanese iron chef by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Not as delightful as the original, but it works, it is enjoyable to watch, because the TONE is the same: they really care about the food, and they really pay attention to the cooking and technique.

      No they don't, though they do an excellent job of making you think they do. The whole point of the show is to showcase the Food Network's favored sons, name drop foodie celebrities and flavors of the moment, and oh - bring in Cat Cora, an untrained third rater, so the Food Network couldn't be accused of not being politically correct.

    2. Re:i was a fan of the original japanese iron chef by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I thought whole point of iron chef japan was to promote japanese chefs and their fancy restaurants which are featured quite well in every episode.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:i was a fan of the original japanese iron chef by ClosedEyesSeeing · · Score: 1

      If something works, don't mess with it!

      Normally I would agree, but American IT Crowd was terrible.

  15. Their #1 sin? Taking it seriously. by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    Their #1 sin? Taking it seriously.

    Half the fun is that Ninja Warrior is self irreverent. And the prize for winning should only be winning, not cash.

    1. Re:Their #1 sin? Taking it seriously. by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      That's my biggest bitch point. If you're going to make a competition that pits human endurance against devious minds and obstacles, leave it that way. I can understand adding trials to get there - too many people would show up and you have to be able to cull the herd. After that, though, I don't care who has the fastest time. I don't care if Joe is better than John. I want to see Joe and John both bust their asses to get to the end. AND putting money up for grabs?

      Bullshit.

      It's bullshit. It takes the spirit of the competition and completely changes it. Leave it the fuck alone. Life is already too full of competition against other idiot monkeys. Why can't we have one thing that pits all of us against one thing? Teams, and what-not.

    2. Re:Their #1 sin? Taking it seriously. by MisterZimbu · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact the Japanese version has prize money too.

      I'm pretty sure they have competitions for qualifying beforehand, too. They just don't air that part on TV.

    3. Re:Their #1 sin? Taking it seriously. by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      b. . . but. . . .BUT MY RAGE!!! MY ALL-ENCOMPASSING RAGE???!!!???!!!

      Well, shit. I guess it's back to politics for rage-time.

  16. this is why i'm cancelling cable by alen · · Score: 1

    part of my $165 bill goes to this crap

    1. Re:this is why i'm cancelling cable by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 4, Informative

      You should be cancelling cable because it's $165.

  17. Cargo Cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was going to post about the American Top Gear too.

    It seems that the USA excels at finding good shows from other countries, bringing them here, and then completely missing the point. It's classic Cargo Cult mentality: the superficial form is there, but they entirely fail to understand why it was good to begin with.

    1. Re:Cargo Cult by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just like we Americans TV did to The Office, right?

      There's plenty of hit and miss both ways. I've been suck into too many episodes of Law and Order (eh, it's a small vice), but Law and Order UK? Pass. And why the hell did they feel they needed Geordie Shore? Someone over there saw jersey Shore and thought that it was a good idea?

      Fun reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_television_series_based_on_British_television_series http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_television_programmes_based_on_American_television_series

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Cargo Cult by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that the original is almost always the best. Whether it's a British show remade for Americans, or a film remake like "The Italian Job," a novel to film, or even a film to novelization.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    3. Re:Cargo Cult by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just like we Americans TV did to The Office, right?

      Yeah, but the American "The Office" was made by the person who made the British one. I think if American Ninja Warrior was made by the same people who did the Japanese one, it would be much truer to its original format, and consequently much better.

    4. Re:Cargo Cult by drkim · · Score: 1

      Yeah - like when the British stole our American "Sherlock Holmes" movie idea and made their "Sherlock" series.

    5. Re:Cargo Cult by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

      The novelization of Hackers was better than the original movie.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    6. Re:Cargo Cult by CityZen · · Score: 1

      The first few American Office episodes, where they were essentially copies of the British ones, were not as good as the British ones. However, once they found their own groove, it really picked up.

    7. Re:Cargo Cult by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      I think you need to give it more time. Watch the first few seasons of the UK Top Gear. They were also pretty bad. One of the UK hosts (Clarkson?) said something to the effect that the hosts of the US Top Gear haven't had time to develop the deep hatred of each other that makes the UK show work.

    8. Re:Cargo Cult by Whatah1 · · Score: 1

      The "finals stage" Los Vegas episodes that started running this week are much different than the preliminary regionals stages.
      In the preliminary stages contestants were competing against each other and bumped each other out of contention.
      For the Los Vegas episodes they are starting over again on Stage1. They are using actual obstacle blue prints from Sauske.
      Contestants are running against the clock, not against each other.
      It is very possible that not a single person will get to the top of Stage4.
      They have not announced "who gets the $500,000" if no one gets to the top of Stage4. Longtime Sauske fans would expect the prize to not be given, but this this is the USA it is likely they will give it to "the person who goes the furthest the fastest". In the Japanese version there have only been 3 winners in the 27 previous events (events are usually run twice a year).

      Normally there is a limited "American Ninja Warrior" competition and the 2-4 winners get sponsored by G4 to go to Japan and participate in the actual tournament. The reason why we are getting such a large event this year (3-4 eps for each of the 6 regions and 6+ episodes for the finals, all hour long) might be due to the company that produces Sauske (Monster 9, who also produce Kunoichi, Ultimate Banzuke, and Muscle Musical) filed for bankruptcy Nov 2011. It seems that this postponed Sauske 28 so in the interim Tokyo Broadcasting System decided to work with NBC to run this event in USA.

      The regionals suffered from massive redundancy because you had everyone run a version of stage1, then the top 30 would run a slightly longer version of stage1. This led to seeing the same competitor profiles multiple times in back-to-back episodes and seeing the same people run mostly the same obstacles over and over for almost 20 hours/episodes.

      But now that they are on the Vegas episodes, running off of a course built using Sauske blueprints, and running against the clock instead of against each other, I am happy to watch all these profile vids one last time since this is pretty close to actual Sauske.

  18. Batman himself would have trouble completing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But what about Superman? Have you even considered that, just maybe,
    that Superman is better than Batman? Superman doesn't have a batmobile
    becase he doesn't need one! Even consider that! Thought so...

    CAPTCHA = stormed

  19. "Human interest bloat" by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "American Ninja Warrior" ... suffers badly from human interest bloat.

    It's endemic in US TV coverage of any individual sport, it seems. The Olympics have been unwatchable for years, because you get 2 minutes of sprinting or swimming or tumbling, and a half-hour sob story about the life struggles of one of the American athletes. Great, she was orphaned at age 2 and raised in abject poverty by her quadrapeligic great-aunt in the basement of a pig slaughterhouse; it's amazing that she overcame that to become a world champion gymnast. Now can we PLEASE turn off the sad music and cut to cycling or equestrian jumping, or javelin-throwing, or archery, or any one of the other dozen events you've been ignoring all week because there's not a photogenic American with a compelling life story in the top 5 contenders?

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:"Human interest bloat" by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      That happens everywhere.

      Where I live we don't get the sob story but we do get to spend an entire week watching some crappy minority sport, completely ignoring all others, just because it's the only event where our country has a hope of winning a medal.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:"Human interest bloat" by Rising+Ape · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess they have to somehow disguise the fact that watching 30 seconds of sprinting is extremely dull.

    3. Re:"Human interest bloat" by brainzach · · Score: 1

      Human interest stories is how you draw casual fans into watching a niche sport. You need a story behind the competitors if you want to capture interest. In mainstream sports, you can know the storylines by watching the games on TV,reporters endless debates on ESPN or talking with your coworkers.

      American Ninja Warrior doesn't have that same luxury so the producers have to add human interest stories and competitive storylines. This creates drama so that the viewer at home has something to root for or against. Having a bunch of anonymous contestants run an obstacle for purity sake is not going to cut it.

      I don't usually watch swimming, but I will watch Michael Phelps go for 7 gold medals. The storyline is what makes it interesting, not the actual sport to the casual fan.

  20. It's a Bird! It's a Plane! by T-Mckenney · · Score: 1

    No! It's the flying fucks I don't give! ...It must be a very slow news day.

    1. Re:It's a Bird! It's a Plane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it if you've never watched the snow.

      It's like a real life Super Mario Bros game. No surprise it comes from Japan.

  21. American Culture isn't completely like Japanese... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    America and Japan, are two very different countries, with a much different culture.
    While we have similarities, there are also big differences.

    For example back when I was a Kid, in Boy Scouts I was Hiking in New Mexico (Philmont a big Boy Scout Camp, where people come from around the world) There was a Japanese Troop that was taking a similar route that we had, and we met up from time to time. At the Trading Posts there was what was called a Swap Box. Where after we get our Rations of food (usually for 2 or 3 days) we can go threw them, drop food we didn't like, and pickup food that we did like. We actually loved it when the Japanese troop was there the same day. They would trade Oat Meal Packets which we really liked, with some energy bars we found to be disgusting. Because Americans Like Sweet food more then Japanese do.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  22. Go outside by Jailbrekr · · Score: 1

    Why are you sperging over what sounds like nothing more than an MXC clone? Life goes on.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Go outside by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      You watch MXC to see people fail (and they always do). You watch Ninja Warrior to see people succeed (and they hardly ever do). They're both obstacle courses, but otherwise the tone, purpose, editing, style, humor are are completely different.

  23. ABC has hit, NBC copies by Antipater · · Score: 1

    They're just trying to compete with Wipeout. Don't judge too harshly for dumbing themselves down.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  24. Because Wipeout is better by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

    Honestly. Its funnier and has a better T&A factor.

    Who wants to see something that takes itself too seriously? I'll watch the Olympics for that.

  25. "Sasuke" does relate to ninjas by seibai · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mr. Stark apparently doesn't know much about Japanese culture. "Sasuke" is a rather straightfroward reference to Sarutobi Sasuke, and the name has been used to invoke the idea of ninjas since at least the 1920's.

    1. Re:"Sasuke" does relate to ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seconded. A quick way to check is to look at the English Wikipedia disambiguation page for Sasuke - most of the entries are for the names of characters who are ninjas. And there's a women's competition called "Kunoichi" too, just to rule out any doubt. How did the original poster get the idea that Sasuke means "excellence"?

      And although "yama" does mean mountain, the Japanese for Mount Fuji is Fuji-san, not Fujiyama. "San" here is the on-yomi of the kanji for mountain.

      Also, taking "yama" off the end of place names is silly, because often these places are not really mountains. Should Kooriyama be "Mount Koori"? Should Daikanyama be "Mount Daikan"? Just calling the place Midoriyama would make the most sense.

    2. Re:"Sasuke" does relate to ninjas by thomst · · Score: 3, Funny

      seibai reproved:

      Mr. Stark apparently doesn't know much about Japanese culture. "Sasuke" is a rather straightfroward reference to Sarutobi Sasuke [wikipedia.org], and the name has been used to invoke the idea of ninjas since at least the 1920's.

      I sit corrected. My Japanese is a little rusty these days - it's been more than fifty years since I lived there.

      --
      Check out my novel.
  26. mini-bios by demonbug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The worst part is definitely the little bio bits. Boring, and I just don't care. Reminds me of Olympic broadcasts here in the U.S. Twenty minutes of giving the life story of every American athlete, then thirty seconds of those athletes failing miserably. If there's time left between commercials, they might show the top three or four foreign competitors. Yuck. Drop the "human interest", just give me the goddamn events - as many as you can cram into however much time you have. I would much rather be watching the last place pole vaulter from New Guinea than some shitty story about how American Athlete #3 is bravely competing through the pain of a stubbed toe and their mother's recent diagnosis of a hang nail.

    Same with Ninja Warrior - I enjoy the Japanese version from time to time, because 90% of the show is someone actually trying to complete the course. You know, the interesting part that got me to turn on the channel. Minimal time is spent on building up each individual competitor, and the brief sketches they do occasionally give are more than enough to establish who the person is. American version, approximately 60-70% seems to be build-up for athletes who end up eating it on the first obstacle.

  27. Re:A guess? It's designed for idiots. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    I don't know that I agree that a zero-sum game is American.

  28. simpler than you think by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Everything G4 touches turns to a burning pile of dead ashes. They're like the grim reaper on steroids. That's the only explanation that's necessary really. But this show must be at least somewhat decent seeing as how a story about it somehow ninja'ed its way onto slashdot for no obvious reason. Pretty stealthy.

  29. Complete the Course and Still Lose by theBraindonor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Your critique of the show turning winning contestants into losers is dead on. Kamerion Wimbley took and completed the preliminary course. Watching a man of his size complete the course was amazing to see. Then we got to see him get knocked out due to other contestants coming in with faster times. And then watched an added insult in the finals when they bring in 'wild card' contestants--many of whom did not even complete the preliminary course. And of course all the wildcards were turned into 'human interest' stories. Thankfully the grandfather wildcard actually did complete the course.

    My biggest issue with the show was that they end up giving only summaries of the runs to half of the contestants--even after having 2/3rds of the contestants competing on the G4 show. The original show packed the same amount of content into 30 minutes that NBC is trying to stretch to 2 hours.

  30. Re:A guess? It's designed for idiots. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    You forgot one:

    Add a presenter who's nowhere near as witty as he thinks he is.

    --
    No sig today...
  31. Most Americanized shows are inferior to originals by Norwell+Bob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now, with sports, you'd expect a much easier crossover, but I can see the submitter's points, for sure. But in the case of most other shows that get imported to the States, most notably (IMHO) British comedy, they just don't translate well due to cultural differences. IT Crowd was a fantastic show in the UK... did the US version ever make it past the pilot (almost a scene for scene reproduction which, for whatever reason, was just weak and didn't work?)

    The Office is another example people use, although I must admit I've never spent any considerable time watching either. How is the US version of Shameless compared to the UK version?

    I'm going way off topic here, but I feel like ranting, so mod me as you will. It seems like ever since the Sonic the Hedgehog commercials of the mid-90s hit the airwaves, America has this obsession with being loud, irreverent, and in-your-face. TV shows and movies largely eschew complicated or subtle humor in favor of lets-see-how-much-we-can-get-away-with. That's what turned me off to Family Guy after the first few seasons. Alright, McFarlane, we get it... you're really pushing the envelope there with your three identical shows. Sadly, most "average citizens" seem to eat this garbage up. I often think of the scene in Idiocracy with the TV show "Ow My Balls".

    Honestly, I have Comcast at my apartment solely for the Internet (it costs you more if you don't get TV through them also)... I have about a dozen channels, 8 of which son en Espanol... but I have an XBox360 and Netflix, and far more quality programming to watch than I'll ever get to, thanks to those.

    Allow me to digress one more time, though... and slightly back on topic. One Japanese obstacle course show that was aired by Spike was altered to the point of parody, and THAT worked... in the US it was called "MXC" or "Most Extreme Elimination Challenge", and the ridiculous voice overs were done, IIRC, by comedians, and were genuinely funny. I miss that show.

  32. Re:Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill by Clovis42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny, but I guess it probably isn't really true ...

    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+debunking+of+Torpenhow+Hill-a098250320

    I got that link from the Wikipedia article on the subject.

    --
    Clovis
    ^ Clovis, look! It's that guy you are!
  33. Re:Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Funny
    Gobi Desert

    PIN number

    Crappy remake

  34. People actually watch G4? by morari · · Score: 2

    After they completely ruined TechTV? You're part of the problem.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  35. Re:Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

    Well, at least we'll always have people who say "the El Alamo."

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  36. Commentators Are Worthless And Annoying by AMMalena · · Score: 1

    I say that on top of what is already mentioned in the original article, the COMMENTATORS on Amerincan NW are a huge part of the problem. Especially the former Olympian (I think that's his claim to fame, by recall). They (and he especially) are ANNOYING. It's likely half the WRITING itself, but when they are talking as if they are doing it LIVE (which they obviously are not) and say things "as they are happening" to make it seem like they're completely on top of what's going down -- it's annoying as hell.

    People jump onto the rope hang obstacle, and people landing above or below the "same area" are scolded for being below or above an ideal point (in other words, they are wildly inconsistent in their commentary). They are VERY uninteresting to listen to generally speaking.

    The Japanese's way of making it FUN and as the original article points out "men against the course" is much more enjoyable.

    Another fine Japanese show Americanized and ruined (just like Iron Chef.. heck, just like Godzilla for that matter, thanks Matt Broderick).

    --
    AMMalena (www.Malena.net) "The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote." (Kosh, B5)
  37. MXC for the WIN! by BetaDays · · Score: 1

    I loved MXC on Spike TV here in the states..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MXC

    --
    Paul: Father... father, the sleeper has awakened! - Dune
  38. i don't understand by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    yes, of course that is their point. who cares? why does it matter?

    they get to pick recipes and ingredients beforehand, the food is cooked outside of an hour, you know who your competitor is going to be, you know what the secret ingredient is, the meal the judges eat isn't actually the meal that was just prepared, etc., etc.: it's completely fake, the original japanese version was completely fake too

    i read this "expose" in the village voice years ago, i had to laugh: there's people out there who actually ever thought this was real? pt barnum was right, there really is a naive clueless sucker born every minute:

    http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-02-19/restaurants/iron-chef-boyardee/

    so fucking what?

    are you someone who was actually surprised that a hawaiian filipino martial artist is not actually the nephew of chairman kaga? LOL

    the point, for YOU:

    it's ENTERTAINMENT

    get it?

    i mean, do you go see "The Avengers" in the movie theatre and stand up and say "Hey! They are using CGI! That guy didn't actually turn into a giant green monster! It's all fake! I can't enjoy it anymore! aaaahhh!"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  39. I like ANW by ebunga · · Score: 2

    Therefore, you are wrong and should reevaluate every life choice you have ever made.

  40. Teleprompter city by Torodung · · Score: 1

    I think the funniest part is watching the two commentators ignore each others teleprompted crap, wait for their cue, then say "That's right," and plow right on with a complete non sequitur. Disturbingly often.

    Our group of viewers dreamed up this example:

    Moseley: Well Matt, I think Hitler had some pretty good ideas in 1936, and that really shows on the Warped Wall today.

    Iseman: That's RIGHT! and vanilla paste makes an excellent... wait. WHAT?

    Has SNL hit this turkey yet?

  41. So if you do not like it..... by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

    Then maybe you should just not watch it?

  42. Why not? No bigger issues in the U.S., right? by Torodung · · Score: 1

    But all said and done, for me it would go a long way towards reparations if Mr. Octopus showed up and started bitch slapping Jonny Moseley with a live squid. Bread and circuses, baby.

  43. Just bloated in general by dirk · · Score: 1

    While the human interest bloat is definitely there, the show is just bloated in general. I watched Ninja Warrior to watch people take on the course. In American Ninja Warrior, I have to sit through qualifiers of people taking on part of the course. And then these same people take on the same part of the course with a couple more obstacles added on. And this happens in like 4 different "regions". I got tired of the show LONG before they got anyway near actually taking on the real course. Yes, the qualifiers are important to get a good field, but I don't want to watch them. Just show me the finals of people actually tackling the course and I'll watch it.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  44. Sasuke means what? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

    ""Sasuke" means something like "excellence" in Japanese."

    No, Sasuke has no translatable definition. To say excellence in Japanese, it's shuuitsu, shun, or shunei.

    Sasuke is the name of a revered warrior, Sarutobi Sasuke.

    Go figure neither editors nor article writer have any real fucking clue about the Japanese language, and thus would have NO clue about the origins of the name of a 'ninja-based' show.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Sasuke means what? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Also, excellent or awesome, as an exclamation, is 'sugei' or 'sugoi'

      Back to JPT1 for the editors and article writer.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  45. this is nonsense by Nightshade · · Score: 2

    This show is great, your complaints are silly.

    So next you'll complain about having an American version of iron chef? Go back to watching reruns of Takeshi's Castle...

  46. If it's similar to wipeout... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 2

    ...then the biggest problem lies in the obstacle course itself.
    In wipeout, the obstacle course looks stupid easy, and it seems that they only pick contestants that have the dexterity of an infant.
    In the Japanese ones that I've seen, i can take one look at the obstacle courses and say "fuck that, I'd never win"
    The contestants themselves varied in skill as well. There were some that failed at the gate, and others that would just wow you.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  47. Re:"Sasuke" came from a ninja named Sasuke by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

    That is correct, AC. "Excellence" indeed. For most Japanese, they associate the word with the ninja from legend.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  48. Compare to Wipeout by dcollins · · Score: 2

    Some initial points of agreement:
    (1) Americans take foreign shows and remake them in a way that violates the whole point.
    (2) American producers are obsessed with dumb-ass human interest stories (Olympics unwatchable for me)
    (3) Reality shows are usually their own perfect "essence" in their first season, and interesting as participants try to learn the rules on the fly; and then shows go downhill, violating their essence with the need to vary challenges/ surprise/ shake things up in later seasons.

    Compare to the summer show Wipeout, which has some similarities but is American-specific (I think). I adored it in the first season; after that, borderline unwatchable. The problem here is that in the first season, the challenges were at least conceivably doable; if 24 people ran through them and mostly got demolished, maybe 1 or 2 very athletic people per show would dash through them successfully, and it was exciting and awesome to watch ("sasuke", I guess you say). I would applaud. There was a nice narrator arc every episode starting out snarky, and then near the end complimenting and praising the finalists.

    The problem is in the second season they started fetishisizing the failures, and the challenges were made so hard as to be impossible. I don't think in the last 2-3 seasons anyone has successfully made it through the first round of the show. There's no drama to it, it's just a dumb-ass repetitive series of people getting dunked. I don't mind competition, but there has to be some chance of something different happening or it's repetitive boring bullshit.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Compare to Wipeout by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Well, Wipeout is supposed to be a clone of Takeshi's Castle, which was absolutely insane.

      This, though... When you consider that the average person in America is fat and lazy, and the course is really designed for people with lots of muscles and about 125-140 lbs body weight, it's not too surprising that they took 500+ people and ran them through qualifiers. They then were left with 100 reasonably competent people to go at it who had a chance of completing it and, well, they got about 15 people to finish stage 1. About double the number in Japan, but considering that we have a bit more than double the population of Japan, it's within reason. Note - the final stage 1 in Las Vegas was a virtual clone of Sasuke 27 and 28, down to the inch. we moaned at the warped wall being a gimmie in the qualifiers, but there it was in all its ugliness in Las Vegas.

      From what I can gather, they have taken great pains to make it as miserable and horrifyingly difficult as the original in the last three stages for this year. And they expect nobody to really win it. I expect maybe 5 or 6 to even make it to stage 3. They they all fail. The jumps and distances, especially on the last obstacle of part 3, are practically un-doable. We might see 1 or 2 people try the last climb. Good luck with that.

      They have run it for four seasons so far. Nobody has made it past stage 3. And they've made it harder this year.

    2. Re:Compare to Wipeout by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the extra info!

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:Compare to Wipeout by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 1

      I *completely* agree. Human-interest stories are what make me want to tape everything, so I have a way to fast-forward through the BS.

      Secondly, the so-called challenges from WO are just impossible. Not impossible like Sasuke, where people get better and can actually do them (rolling thingy comes to mind), but what is up with the punching wall from WO? There is no way to really get past it, you might as well just dive into the muck to start with.

      I liked the reality show set in Japan, something like "I'm on a Japanese Game Show!", but I shudder to think what the Americans would do with it if it got really popular. I understand it wasn't really a Japanese game show, but the challenges were at least somewhat believable that someone could do them if they had some skills or learned how it worked.

  49. Re:Gomenasai Slashdot by story645 · · Score: 1

    Posting to undue mod, I thought this was kinda funny, though I'd go with a yutaka for full otakuness.

    --
    open source modern art: laser taggi
  50. Japanese Winners by vigiles · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a guy on the Japanese version that completed all of the courses once or twice? The Gas Attendant (Can't remember his name sorry). Also Most Extreme Elimination Challenge (MXC) was another excellent show that was mangled when brought to the US.

  51. Re:Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I think "Rio Grande river" can be forgiven. In English, we think of that river's name as "Rio Grande" - not "Grande" (or, worse, "Really Big").

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  52. Re:A guess? It's designed for idiots. by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, you start of with something that's popular. Then you assume that Americans are too stupid to understand any culture other than the perfectly homogenised average of the USA as portrayed by Hollywood.

    And I think that the crazy part of it is that they take something popular, and then they go, "Well American audiences would never go for that! We have to change it." No, American audiences *would* go for that. They did go for that. You know they did, because it was popular enough that you wanted to copy it.

    I don't think the problem is necessarily that the producers think the American audience is dumb (though I'm sure it's part of it), but that the producers themselves are dumb. Their job is to make television shows that people want to watch, and they're not very good at it.

  53. Unbeatable Banzuke is WAY better by SatanClauz · · Score: 1

    maybe its just me?

  54. Re:Gomenasai Slashdot by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    What the hell is speaking Kanji? You sir, are in imposter!

  55. Human Interest Stories Drive Ratings by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    Personally, I too am irritated with all the excess of human interest stories, especially in the case of American Ninja Warrior where I'm sure they have PLENTY of footage to fill up the time.

    However, the reason they did it is probably for the same reason that NBC adds human interest stories to the Olympics: because people want them. Believe it or not, most Americans actually do want the human interest stories to help humanize athletes. Otherwise, it's people watching a whole slew of sports that they barely understand. I'm not saying that this is a good thing, but this is why it happens. People don't enjoy watching just straight feeds of raw sporting footage.

    1. Re:Human Interest Stories Drive Ratings by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      They could always show footage of the sport, cut with explanations of the objectives and challenges of it, so people would better appreciate why the event they're watching is significant.

      (Instead of explanations of the aspirations and hardships of the contestants highlighting why the person they're watching is significant.)

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  56. jeez. by kevb0t · · Score: 1

    The phrase "News for nerds" has never been more appropriate.

  57. Military obstacle course by tepples · · Score: 1

    There is nothing "warrior" about "American Ninja Warrior".

    Perhaps "warrior" in the title is on the theory that Mount Midori is an obstacle course reminiscent of the one that soldiers in boot camp have to complete.

  58. Sasuke does relate to the Ninja by CayceeDee · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to go back to Ninja school. The word Sasuke has a long tradition related to the ninja. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarutobi_Sasuke

  59. Re:Slow news day? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    By the Old Ones, you just redeemed half a year of AC trolling with that, my dear coward!

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  60. Another Iron Chef? by Fool106 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of that show Iron Chef. I loved watching the Japanese version with the dubs just like 'Ninja Warrior'. But when they made American versions, I thought it was just utter crap and couldn't stand watching it.

  61. Re:Mount Midoriyama? Not as cool as Torpenhow hill by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1
    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  62. I think it's entertaining by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    I never saw the original (or the American edited version of the original), but am interested in American Ninja Warrior.

    The "often-snarky English commentary and graphics overlaid on the Japanese original" sounds less interesting than the original Japanese version (subtitled or dubbed) would be in full. It sounds like they basically turn it into "Wipeout". (In fact, on the Engadget HD podcast, one of the co-hosts compared the original to "Wipeout". Wipeout has gotten boring because it's TOO goofy.)

    I'm not sure I'll watch further seasons of "American Ninja Warrior", but I think it's entertaining, and the proportion of "sport" to contestant profiles seems very high to me. Then again, I record everything, and if the profiles got boring, I'd just FF (just like I do with any of the Olympics that bore me). Though I basically watch all of the non-actual-competition part at 1.5x anyway. (Except for scripted sitcoms & dramas, I pretty much watch anything else -- news, documentaries, game shows/reality shows, faster than realtime.)

  63. What's really wrong with American Ninja Warrior by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    The real problem with American Ninja Warrior (aside from there being no American Ninjas), is that there aren't enough Monkey Pirates fighting Cyber-Dinosaurs with Shark Lasers.

  64. Re:American Culture isn't completely like Japanese by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    No it is because my Pinky finger isn't being utilized as much as my other Fingers, while typing.
    Besides, I like to capitalize Nouns, it seems more German to me.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  65. Wall of Words from unknown reviewer... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1
    Humm... I did not know that NBC was also in cahoots with G4 since they are also playing American Ninja Warrior on over-the-air transmissions.

    First: Most of what Thom Stark is saying is pure "Stuff nobody cares about" and then proceeds to ad hoc insult for G4. Not a good way to make your point or be taken seriously by saying:

    G4's marketeers clearly decided that their ADHD-addled core audience of video gamers was unlikely to find a show called "Excellence" compelling enough to warrant paying attention, so they decided to jazz it up by invoking ninjas, instead. Oh, and warriors, too, to make it more appealing to the World of Warcraft fanatics.

    Making generalizations or making speculative claims == Fast and easy way to lose any kind of respect or take your POV seriously.

    Secondly: Has it ever dawned on Thom Stark that trying to translate a popular TV/Anime/Game/Song/Media/etc. from Japan to English verbatim will cause even those "ADHD-addled core audience of video gamers" to be confused because of the cultural differences? That translating something 100% will confuse those not familiar with the culture 100% of the time?

    In other words: A lot of what is said and done in Japan won't make sense here in the US. Vice Versa is true too.

    Finally: As stated in the first sentence: This is being aired by NBC on their network. Therefore people aren't going to care for much of what this "review" is about. Much less about being called "ADHD-addled core audience of video gamers". Most that will watch it will be the ones that like shows like American Gladiator or Wipeout. Hardly MMO players or G4 fans.

  66. Veep sucks too by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    First episode of Veep was awful compared to The Thick of It. Didn't bother watching the rest.

    Also, US portrayal of the English is beyond weird. If I stated as fact that every American is exactly the same as that fat bloke in Caddyshack, there are at least Americans like that. There aren't any English people like those portrayed in US programmes.