Slashdot Mirror


A Million-Year Hard Disk

sciencehabit writes "Pity the builders of nuclear waste repositories. They have to preserve records of what they've buried and where, not for a few years but for tens of thousands of years, perhaps even millions. Trouble is, no current storage medium lasts that long. Today, Patrick Charton of the French nuclear waste management agency ANDRA presented one possible solution to the problem: a sapphire disk inside which information is engraved using platinum. The prototype shown costs €25,000 to make, but Charton says it will survive for a million years. The aim, Charton says, is to provide 'information for future archaeologists.' But, he concedes: 'We have no idea what language to write it in.'"

276 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. easy answer. by the+biologist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What language? All of them.

    1. Re:easy answer. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What language? All of them.

      They should write it in C -- it'll never go away since it'll always be needed for embedded systems.

    2. Re:easy answer. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Yep! Nothing like good old redundancy to make information accessible.

      Also, we're getting pretty good at crypto these days. Why not apply the reverse? If you had to figure out a language from scratch, what markers would be the best? What about recursiveness? Stick a dictionary on the thing, once they manage to bootstrap the rest becomes much easier.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:easy answer. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      C is the right answer because it's always the default $LANG.

    4. Re:easy answer. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Ah if we're going to hell, let's just write it in Java and Pascal while we're at it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:easy answer. by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. Write down the same text in, say, the top 10 major modern languages and writing systems (let's say, English, Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, Hindi, French, Russian, Japanese etc).

      Maybe include a concise dictionary of each language as well.

      That way, even if the thing doesn't end up being useful for its designated purpose as a nuclear site marker, it may one day in the far future serve as a Rosetta Stone for the languages and writing systems of our era.

    6. Re:easy answer. by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Write it in Lisp. If future generations are unable to read this then it will mean that civilization has collapsed.

    7. Re:easy answer. by philip.paradis · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that means civilization will collapse immediate after it's written.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    8. Re:easy answer. by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Funny

      011100110110001101 110010011001010 1110111001000000100 0011001000000111000001110 101011101000010000001101 00101110100001000000 110000101101100011011000010000001 10100101101110001000000110 00100110100101101110011000010111001001111001

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    9. Re:easy answer. by Artea · · Score: 5, Informative

      011100110110001101 110010011001010 1110111001000000100 0011001000000111000001110 101011101000010000001101 00101110100001000000 110000101101100011011000010000001 10100101101110001000000110 00100110100101101110011000010111001001111001

      "screw C put it all in binary"
      I wonder who else bothered to convert this up before me.

    10. Re:easy answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      01001001 00100111 01101101 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01110111 01100101 01110010 01100101 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 01110011 00101110

    11. Re:easy answer. by lw54 · · Score: 1

      The equivalent of the Rosetta stone will be detailing our nuclear waste archive.

    12. Re:easy answer. by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      What language? All of them.

      Absolutely. The more, the better. It's not simply a matter of trying to guess what language they're most likely to be able to understand... the value of the disk to them skyrockets due to all the languages they don't understand, or at least didn't until we provided them with the ultimate Rosetta Stone.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    13. Re:easy answer. by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      But, we are asked not for a solution but ,*"Pity the builders of nuclear waste repositories.*
      In accordance with their request: "There, there".

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    14. Re:easy answer. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Whatever language they choose, they definitely should include a dictionary, one that translates to and from Galactic Standard. That should be good for at least a few million more years, and when it's revised (as those bureaucrats at Galactic Center have been threatening for the past million years), there will certainly be translators provided for backwards compatibility.

      It'd be better if it could be to/from Universal Standard, but of course, they're only been working on their first release for 12 billion years, so it's no surprise that they're not quite there yet. It can sometimes be a real pain to rely on all those billions of standard languages, one per galaxy. But you know how long government bureaucrats can take to accomplish anything useful such as universal standards.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    15. Re:easy answer. by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Yes. Write down the same text in, say, the top 10 major modern languages and writing systems (let's say, English, Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, Hindi, French, Russian, Japanese etc).

      No need. You're dealing with nuclear waste. Just draw a picture and provide it as a key. Show an image of a uranium atom with different colors or patterns for protons versus neutrons, then show the count of each in unary. Then give the name of the element in English or your choice of other languages. Use that name everywhere else. Include several copies of the key to minimize the risk of it being destroyed.

      As for presentation, think laser cutting in a large block of metal. The larger the feature, the longer it will take to erode or corrode. Make it out of gold-plated bronze or something, and make each letter's size and cutting depth be measured in feet.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:easy answer. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      Given the advances in AI, encryption, pattern recognition and so on, the language it will be written in is completely secondary. Write it in the language which can render the best what you have to say. The Rosetta stone wouldn't be needed today to decrypt hieroglyphs and much harder puzzles were deciphered since then. As long as you have sufficient data or text written in that language.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    17. Re:easy answer. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Pick a few large languages; Spanish, English, Russian, Chinese (Simplified), combine with symbols.

      If a future civilization is unable to decipher that and not being able to be careful considering the findings of remains from our time then one may ask if that civilization is worth protecting.

      Otherwise a future civilization may actually find this useful, it may be a Rosetta stone for them.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    18. Re:easy answer. by Doofus · · Score: 1

      This assumes that the interpretation of binary in the far future is the same as what you intend here, which is ASCII.

      And while ASCII is portable, is it guaranteed to be a known, useful encoding a hundred years from now? A thousand years?

      --
      If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    19. Re:easy answer. by Tuidjy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pictures.

      One picture is case civilization has collapsed - skulls, and people on fire.

      One picture in case civilization has not collapsed. An orbital model of the atom, with little balls streaming away.

      What if the archeologist is not humanoid and is used to a completely different models for atoms/particles? Then let the fucker burn, what do we care about octopi from Alpha Centauri?

      And anyway, we still understand Hebrew, Greek and Latin after 2000 years. I would be amazed if civilization endures in 10000 years AND English has been lost.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    20. Re:easy answer. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 3, Funny
      You're kidding, right?

      The ONLY thing that needs to be put onto a million-year hard-drive is

      001100 010010 011110 100001 101101 110011

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    21. Re:easy answer. by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excellent idea! We'll use pictures. And we'll use the IFF/LBM format. That'll make sure everybody understands in the future.
      Actually, I'd be more concerned about how to document the physical layout and filesystem of this disc.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    22. Re:easy answer. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      How adapt is ASCII at encoding chinese, which may very well become the global language if quantity is the measurement to go by?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    23. Re:easy answer. by andymadigan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those valuable metals will be quickly stripped away like the stones of old roman buildings.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    24. Re:easy answer. by Tuidjy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, come on. The very idea to use a CD is kinda dim, and plain pictures on a titanium plate is a much better way to go about it, but if you have to use digital media, there are formats that any civilized person will decipher rather quickly.

      Assuming sequential binary, here is a simple video format that is extremely inefficient, but I think everyone will understand.

      Simple bitmap, and begin by repeating an empty frame a few times. A empty 8x8 frame would look like this: 1111111110000001100000011000000110000001100000011000000111111111

      Repeat it enough times for the reader to get that there is a pattern, then start flipping the zeros to ones to produce your images.

      I think that most people would get it.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    25. Re:easy answer. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      If it were me? I'd say Spanish, English, and Chinese, simply because those three languages would not only cover the most people but if history is an indicator then those 3 will be the most likely to survive, or at least some offshoot in any case.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:easy answer. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Some cultures have not taken skulls to be a symbol of death though. In ten thousand years, maybe the primative tribes that survive consider skulls to be a symbol of the cycle of life and renewal or whatever superstious rubbish they have invented by then. They'll run into the storage facility thinking it'll make them young again.

    27. Re:easy answer. by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      >>What language? All of them.
      >They should write it in C -- it'll never go away since it'll always be needed for embedded systems.

      I think he was more like French or English och Chinese. Not computer languages... But, OTOH, I didn't RTFA.

    28. Re:easy answer. by yndrd1984 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some cultures have not taken skulls to be a symbol of death though. In ten thousand years, maybe the primative tribes that survive consider skulls to be a symbol of the cycle of life and renewal or whatever superstious rubbish they have invented by then. They'll run into the storage facility thinking it'll make them young again.

      Then they will have a learning experience.

      Either way, we've helped future generations. :)

    29. Re:easy answer. by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One picture is case civilization has collapsed - skulls, and people on fire.

      If civilization has collapsed, I find it highly unlikely that anyone will be poking around in a vault located hundreds of meters beneath solid rock, with the ramp filled with crushed rocks and concrete.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:easy answer. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even Welsh?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:easy answer. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Given the advances in AI, encryption, pattern recognition and so on, the language it will be written in is completely secondary. Write it in the language which can render the best what you have to say. The Rosetta stone wouldn't be needed today to decrypt hieroglyphs and much harder puzzles were deciphered since then. As long as you have sufficient data or text written in that language.

      the guys worried about forgetting the nuke sites obviously are worried about civilization breaking down and possibly forgetting such things.

      the rosetta stone would still be a fairly good validator to have today, too.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    32. Re:easy answer. by qbast · · Score: 2

      Yes. Write down the same text in, say, the top 10 major modern languages and writing systems (let's say, English, Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, Hindi, French, Russian, Japanese etc).

      No need. You're dealing with nuclear waste. Just draw a picture and provide it as a key. Show an image of a uranium atom with different colors or patterns for protons versus neutrons, then show the count of each in unary. Then give the name of the element in English or your choice of other languages.

      Future archeologist: Hmm, and what is this? Of course, this must be some kind of religious idol. Probably holy symbol of sun worshippers.

    33. Re:easy answer. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. If past civilizations are anything to go by, the records of the various laws, religions, judgements, rulers, and wars will survive.

      Think Egyptians. Think Hebrews. Think Babylonians. What of them has survived for thousands of year? Some architecture and various records. But those records...are probably incomplete. They don't give us much information about what jokes were popular among the Egyptians, what dishes were considered commonplace but spectacular among the Babylonians, and of the Hebrews...well...they know what they're missing.

      Does no one think that the cultures listed here didn't evolve from year to year? Does anyone think something like fashion, the simple style of clothes, remained the same for hundreds of years?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    34. Re:easy answer. by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Future archeologist: Hmm, and what is this? Of course, this must be some kind of religious idol. Probably holy symbol of sun worshippers.

      LOL!
      See also, David MacAuley - Motel of the Mysteries

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    35. Re:easy answer. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also I'd rather not care about them, and instead focus on making civilization not collapse.

      I mean, a few accidental deaths from overzealous exploration is nothing compared to the billions of deaths said civilizational collapse will have required come beforehand to get to that point.

      It's very much why I think no one is having a sensible discussion about nuclear power when timespans like 10,000 years come up. Those people 10,000 years away do not matter to the discussion if the scenario is contrived "well all records have been destroyed and they only have bronze age technology". Well gee, maybe that happened because the planet got completely ruined by runaway climate change and desertification which could've been avoided if they'd switched to nuclear power?

    36. Re:easy answer. by Xyrus · · Score: 2

      They should write it in brainfuck. It accurately reflects the society which created it in the first place. :P

      --
      ~X~
    37. Re:easy answer. by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Holy crap, mods! Am I the only one who RTFA? It's not a CD or computer memory, it's a double layer sapphire disk with silver printing sandwitched in between and needs nothing more complex too read than a simple microscope and knowledge of whatever human language it's written in. The comments about computer languages are JOKES, son (as Mr. Leghorn might say).

      It's something to keep future generations whose civilizations have collapsed safe from the poisons we've buried.

    38. Re:easy answer. by Sociable+Scientician · · Score: 1

      Given the advances in AI, encryption, pattern recognition and so on, the language it will be written in is completely secondary. Write it in the language which can render the best what you have to say. The Rosetta stone wouldn't be needed today to decrypt hieroglyphs and much harder puzzles were deciphered since then. As long as you have sufficient data or text written in that language.

      This is shockingly wrong. There are still several completely undeciphered written languages, and many that are only partially deciphered. For instance, we still don't understand a single symbol of Linear A or the Indus Valley script. And most human languages are expressive enough to express almost any concept. Either way, we can't take for granted that future generations will have our level or a more advanced level of AI or pattern recognition or decryption algorithms.

    39. Re:easy answer. by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is digital. The article says that you can read the documents with a microscope. Which implies they are simply printed very small on the surface of the disk. So sort of think a high tech version of the Rossetta stone for future generations.

    40. Re:easy answer. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      it's shockingly right in many cases. the problem with linear A is we don't know what language it represents. we *can* read 5,000 year old language like proto-chinese pictograms.

    41. Re:easy answer. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ... we still don't understand a single symbol of Linear A ...

      Linear Algebra was hard for me, too.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    42. Re:easy answer. by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Digital != electronic

    43. Re:easy answer. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There is no file system; it's not a computer disk. RTFA!

    44. Re:easy answer. by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      In this case I don't think it is either. The article clearly states you can read the disk with a microscope. Which implies that it is simple text and diagrams printed very small on a durable material.

    45. Re:easy answer. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nope, English has pretty much become the lingua franca of business, so many that don't speak it natively speak English for trade purposes, Spanish is one of the fastest growing languages and between it and Chinese those 3 languages covers a pretty damned large portion of the planet.

      Now if you wanted to argue what will it be like 1000 years from now I'd say that Spanish and English will probably become one language, American English already has a lot of Spanish in it and as more Latinos come north that mixing will just be more prevalent, and with China quickly becoming a true superpower i wouldn't be surprised to see simplified Chinese also become a lot more prevalent.

      But as we have seen we have gone from over 5000 distinct languages and dialects 500 years ago to less than 100 commonly spoken languages (at least last i checked, it may be even lower) so by looking at history barring some planetwide apocalypse the trend is the languages will continue to get smaller as we move forward. Its a global market after all and having fewer languages makes business easier so frankly i wouldn't be surprised if we end up with those 3 as the major languages planetwide within the next 100 years.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    46. Re:easy answer. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      In a cave? There's no wind, and little to no groundwater. After all, those are the usual criteria for selecting the locations of these dumps in the first place.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    47. Re:easy answer. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Why bother, Caesium-137 has a half-life of 30.17 years, so after 3 centuries it's essentially gone, and the remainder is almost pure plutonium; considering that in 3 centuries we'll be on the extreme uncomfortable side of peak-petroleum, nuclear fuel like plutonium will likely be to valuable to leave in the ground to rot away or to use for bombs. The hard part of reclaiming spent nuclear fuel is getting rid of the short-lived fission products,so our waste will seem like mana from heaven.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    48. Re:easy answer. by Rix · · Score: 1

      They'll have to be somewhere they'll be seen, and so people will take them for their material value.

    49. Re:easy answer. by doccus · · Score: 1

      Won't work.. they've left pictures all over the pyramids, stone monoliths, etc.. and they didn't write on stone because they were "primitive" but so that future generations would READ it, and nobody's figured out what they really mean yet , or at least the ones who HAVE are called "crackpots" by our "All knowing" overseers

    50. Re:easy answer. by andymadigan · · Score: 2

      It wasn't wind and water that disassembled most of Hadrian's wall and a good chunk of the facade of the coliseum, it was people, to build houses, mills, and all manner of useful things. No matter how clear you try to make the writing on the wall, in a few thousand (or even a few hundred) years it will be nothing more than a curiosity in the middle of nowhere. The historians and scientists that would have some change of figuring out what it is might never get the chance before someone else finds a way to take it apart and sell it or use it.

      The same probably goes for any recording device made of expensive metals or gems. Stone tablets won't work well either, 99.9% of them haven't survived even 4 thousand years, let alone one million. Recording it somewhere likely to be preserved (the library of congress, wikipedia, maybe even facebook and twitter) might work as long as there's enough civilization to preserve those things. It would only take one luddite-religious revolution to destroy all semblance of knowledge and throw us back in the dark ages, so I wouldn't count on that either.

      A time capsule isn't likely to work, even if it's a time capsule in space (it'll just get lost with all the other space trash). I wonder if we could put a transmitter on the moon and power it for long enough to just continuously send a signal back to earth... I suppose even the best nuclear reactor can't run for a million years. Maybe it could be solar powered? How long would such a device last on the moon, or in space?

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    51. Re:easy answer. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      In that case, put it in a deep mine, and set up a doomsday switch that nukes the tunnel if civilization falls. By the time civilization gets back to the point where it is capable of mining the stuff again, they'll also be advanced enough to recognize the dangers.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    52. Re:easy answer. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      If civilization has collapsed, I find it highly unlikely that anyone will be poking around in a vault located hundreds of meters beneath solid rock, with the ramp filled with crushed rocks and concrete.

      Pessimist.

    53. Re:easy answer. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Probably holy symbol of sun worshippers.

      In a deep underground vault with no windows.

      That makes perfect sense.

    54. Re:easy answer. by jbburks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like sacrificing virgins at the Solstice....

    55. Re:easy answer. by xycadium · · Score: 1

      No, they should write it in VB. It may give distant peoples a headache when they see it and cause the to bicker among each other of why it even exists but at least they'll be able to decipher it without actually knowing the language or even knowing how to read at all.

    56. Re:easy answer. by bobcote · · Score: 1

      I would be amazed if civilization endures in 10000 years AND English has been lost.

      What they call English in even a thousand years may not have a lot in common with what we call English. Remember your first attempt at reading Shakespeare, never mind Chaucer.
      Pictures may be best. As was said a skull may mean nothing. Especially if the finder is non human. They may not have skulls.

    57. Re:easy answer. by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      In the long run, I don't think the Chinese writing style stands a chance in the global economy long term. Spanish/English will win out for the simple reason that learning to read and write English/Spanish, heck, even Russian is FAR easier than Chinese.

      A good essay I found awhile back. http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html/

    58. Re:easy answer. by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      The powers that be would rather see their grandkids eaten by cannibals than release their grip on our chains of fossil fuel bondage. And there is absolutely nothing you or I can do about this, because we live in a world where 80% of the people are spoon fed subtle propaganda from the television and other mainstream media outlets.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    59. Re:easy answer. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The only reason I included China was I think, just as the Brits and then USA, its about to be China's turn to play empire and languages tend to spread with empire building. Look at China's military output, they are building subs like they had WWIII scheduled for next Tuesday, same thing with their fighters. I wouldn't be surprised if most of Africa gets controlled by China in the next 20 years, hell the people would probably welcome their Chinese overlords, couldn't be worse than what they have now.

      But in the end Spanglish I think will most likely be the final winner, the "one language" simply because as you pointed out its easy to type. I could see a simplified Chinese taking hold in areas controlled by China but ultimately I think we'll see English and Spanish slowly merge until its one single language. If you look at history that is where we are headed, one language. with everything global having a single language makes sense and because its easy to type a Spanglish hybrid would most likely end up being the winner.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    60. Re:easy answer. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Won't work.. they've left pictures all over the pyramids, stone monoliths, etc.. and they didn't write on stone because they were "primitive" but so that future generations would READ it, and nobody's figured out what they really mean yet ,

      Bullshit.

      Go read up on Champollion and Young. We've been able to read the hieroglyphics on the Egyptian pyramids etc for nearly 2 centuries now. The fact that they don't talk about our alien overlord octopii from Alpha Centauri is disappointing to crackpots who want their Japanese tentacle-rape cartoon fantasies to be real history, but that is something in the eye of the crackpot, not what is carved into the pyramids.

      If you have an alternative decoding for the Egyptian hieroglyphics, which decodes a substantial proportion of already-known hieroglyph texts, feel free to publish it. Also feel free to have your work torn apart by other workers on hieroglyphs, searching for your errors. That's the science side of archaeology.

      If you have a decoding for the Phaistos Disc, feel free to publish it. But with only one sample of that script (if it is a script), it is going to be fraught to demonstrate that your decoding is correct.

      (I don't know the current state of research on Meso-American hieroglyphs. If I cared, I'd research it.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    61. Re:easy answer. by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      01001001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101101 01101001 01110011 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01100100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101101 01100101 01110111 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00101110

    62. Re:easy answer. by doccus · · Score: 1

      Look, the simple ones yes, everybody can read.. but the ones that show planetary alignments, that could not have been visible to pre-telescope populations, have NOT been decoded, because they assume that because the obvious explanation would have required non-existent technology, they "must mean something else".. so the experts pore over these pictograms trying to assign a meaning that was never meant, and failing.. and the MAJORITY of stone pictograms.. all over the world.. fall into THAT category.

    63. Re:easy answer. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The next time I'm speaking to Prof Ruggles (Professor of Archaeoastronomy @ Leicester ; a distant acquaintance) I'll ask if there are any grounds for dismissing logic in these cases. I have a suspicion of what his answer will be, so I'll get the whiskey in first.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Cuneiform by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's awl-write.

    I'll get me coat.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. If ancient people taught us anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consider stone tablets. I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and last a long time.

    1. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

      I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and some of them last a long time.

      FTFY.

    2. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Lord Jehovah has given unto you these fifteen .... *tablet shatters* .... Ten! Ten Commandments! For all to obey!

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider stone tablets. I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and last a long time.

      Some do, most don't. If you wrote on 100,000 stone tablets today, you can guarantee some will be there in 10,000 years time, but you can also guarantee most won't.

    4. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Consider stone tablets. I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and last a long time.

      They are only cheap if you need a few of them. Each sapphire disk holds 40,000 pages, and the prototype with 2 disks costs "only" €25,000.

      Can you make and engrave a stone tablet for less than €0.30?

    5. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by similar_name · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At this moment your post is modded down '-1 overrated' to give your post a score of zero. IMO /. has had an increasing number of unjustified negative mods. Your post is on-topic and reasonable. You don't have a 6 digit ID (neither do I) but you're a million away from all of the 2.6 million ID trolls and shills and your comment history doesn't indicate you're a nuisance that needs to be modded down all of the time (the last zero score post I see by you is equally baffling). Hopefully someone will come along and at least mod you back to your natural score.

      Perhaps /. shouldn't give more mods to people who spend (or waste) all of their mod points whenever they get them and shouldn't keep giving mods to people who have a history of voting negatively.

      Sorry for the off-topic* post but it's really been bothering me lately and I needed to vent.

      *If someone is going to mod my post down please at least use the correct mod of off-topic.

    6. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At this moment your post is modded down '-1 overrated' to give your post a score of zero. IMO /. has had an increasing number of unjustified negative mods. Your post is on-topic and reasonable. You don't have a 6 digit ID (neither do I) but you're a million away from all of the 2.6 million ID trolls and shills and your comment history doesn't indicate you're a nuisance that needs to be modded down all of the time (the last zero score post I see by you is equally baffling). Hopefully someone will come along and at least mod you back to your natural score.

      Perhaps /. shouldn't give more mods to people who spend (or waste) all of their mod points whenever they get them and shouldn't keep giving mods to people who have a history of voting negatively.

      Sorry for the off-topic* post but it's really been bothering me lately and I needed to vent.

      *If someone is going to mod my post down please at least use the correct mod of off-topic.

      Yeah, I've noticed the same thing. Sometimes I do make flippant remark or make an attempt a humor that (rightfully) gets modded down (but seems like just as often, an inane comment gets moderated up!), and sometimes I'll take an unpopular viewpoint (without making it into a personal attack), which also gets modded down -- moderators seem to have trouble separating dissenting opinions from trolling or offtopic posts. But sometimes I'll have a post like this one that's completely on-topic and relevant (and this time I even did the math right!) and it still gets modded down.

      I figure that I must have pissed someone(s) off in the past and they are retaliating, but I really don't know for sure. If that's what's going on, I assume meta-moderation will eventually catch up to them. But hey, I've still got my 2^6 Score:5 Comment achievement badge, and I wear it proudly!

    7. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by gr8_phk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can encode a "don't open" image on one table, the periodic table on another, several number systems (for translation) on a third, and a schematic of the objects buried on a 4th indicating the radioactive elements inside other materials. So yes, 4 tablets that don't require technology to decode. Or one could do a large tablet including all of the above. The first image is all you need. The other 3 are for civilizations that understand atoms to understand what the hazard is.

    8. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by subreality · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sometimes I do make flippant remark or make an attempt a humor that (rightfully) gets modded down

      My pet peeve: sometimes I make some vaguely amusing remark in the middle of an otherwise well thought out post. Someone moderates it "Funny", but it really wasn't, nor was it meant to be. Then future mods look at it as a trainwrecked attempt at humor rather than being mis-moderated, and it gets pounded to the ground with "overrated". It's really frustrating to have that happen when I put a lot of effort into a long, well-researched comment.

      I'm not sure what could be done about it, though. Perhaps hide the "Funny" flag from moderators to prevent the bias?

    9. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Trogre · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And still they are often ignored. See Japanese tsunami warning stones.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Leuf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article talks about how the pyramids got looted within a generation. So by all means, make your don't dig here notice out of fucking platinum and sapphire. I'm sure no one will want to go looking for those things to steal them. A stone tablet sounds pretty much like the ideal medium, but even that will probably get looted because people are stupid.

    11. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can encode a "don't open" image on one table, the periodic table on another, several number systems (for translation) on a third, and a schematic of the objects buried on a 4th indicating the radioactive elements inside other materials. So yes, 4 tablets that don't require technology to decode. Or one could do a large tablet including all of the above. The first image is all you need. The other 3 are for civilizations that understand atoms to understand what the hazard is.

      Yours is a reasonable suggestion. Who is going to have the technology to magnify, then decipher 40,000 pages etched on a sapphire? Perhaps a Plutonium-powered 3D hologram? Then, in which language ... Latin, perhaps? Or multiple, by then well-dead languages? That sapphire is just as likely to be stuffed into the regalia of some future monarch. (Has anyone had the opportunity to examine current & former royal jewelry / precious stones to see if something similar hasn't already been done 250,000 years ago? What, nobody will let anyone near those jewels? What a surprise ... not.)

      Regardless, one can pretty much count on the likelihood that humanoid-type survivors 250,000 years from now would have created an entire new religion around the task of safeguarding the nuclear waste site from scavengers. I point to the science fiction "A Canticle For Leibowitz" as a reference, since science fiction usually (unfortunately) becomes science fact.

      Better safer more permanent disposal methods & locations need to be found. The bottom of the southern end of the Mariana Trench, where one tectonic plate of the Earth's crust subsumes under the other and back under the Earth's mantle sounds quite a bit more permanent.

    12. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      +1 Overrated :-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by fm6 · · Score: 1
    14. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tablets! Good grief, you apple fanboiz never give up.

    15. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think modding needs 1-5 rankings in multiple categories:

      Relevant: not at all to spot-on
      Funny: no to puked on my keyboard (where no doesn't mean failed humor, just not funny, which most posts would probably be)
      Incendiary: irrational flame bait to cold logic
      Popularity: The author is evil to the author is my god

      My thinking is that if popularity were explicitly differentiated from relevance, people might not be so eager to mark down things which they disagree with.

    16. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      On a closely related note, why keep records for a million years if there are a million years of transcribers (similar to how the Bible has survived, mostly intact, for thousands of years).

      Or... why keep records when we can expect everyone up to a million years from now to be able to easily detect large concentrations/quantities of nuclear waste/radiation?

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    17. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      If LIFE has taught us anything, it's "Store your information in DNA."

      For one thing, you simply cannot beat the ability to make backups. You could make an artificial yeast chromesome or chromesomes, grow up several gallons of the stuff, freeze it down and store it in multiple locations. Future generations will probably be able to sequence them instantly with tricorders or the iPad 900.

      ... of course, you couldn't keep it close to the nuclear waste in question.

    18. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by artor3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if we make the tablet out of some extremely toxic material? That should keep away the looters. Heck, you wouldn't even need to write anything on it. They'd get the idea.

      Eureka! Just bury the waste in open containers! People in the future will figure out they should steer clear much quicker than they'll decode some sapphire disk.

    19. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Consider stone tablets. I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and last a long time.

      Though one must admit they're very hard to swallow.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    20. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Better safer more permanent disposal methods & locations need to be found. The bottom of the southern end of the Mariana Trench, where one tectonic plate of the Earth's crust subsumes under the other and back under the Earth's mantle sounds quite a bit more permanent.

      Ah, dumping radioactive waste into the depths of the ocean. What could possibly go wrong?

    21. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Consider stone tablets. I head they are cheap, easy to come by, and last a long time.

      They also have the benefit of being easily understood technology should we ever have that fourth world war...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    22. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by dargaud · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's dumping and dumping. If you put it in a drilled hole in a subduction zone, it won't ever come out. Or in the lava of volcanos in millions of years. But of course it's not politically correct because this solution involves putting it either in international waters or in front of countries who are not responsible for the radioactive waste.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    23. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Just bury the waste in open containers!

      Actually one proposal was to put the waste in safe but rather standard containers right in front of the white house / Capitol so that the politicians wouldn't forget about them. You bet your ass that they would be inspected and well taken care of.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    24. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Problem is, people tend to base religions on them and interpret them to suit their own beliefs. Future generations might be baptized in holy deuterium.

    25. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Make the plates out of Uranium! Its like a warning sign with built in theft-deterrent!

    26. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by Klync · · Score: 1

      Rightfully, your post is currently showing for me as +5, Interesting. Unfortunately, that fact kinda invalidates your point. So, now we're apparently stuck in the "this sentence is a lie" paradox. Fortunately, it's also completely off topic, thus re-validating your point and setting the universe right again. Yay!

      --

      ----
      Not to be confused with Col.
    27. Re:If ancient people taught us anything... by tzot · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have MTBF numbers for stone tablets?

      --
      I speak England very best
  4. Maybe French, Maybe Not by wallsg · · Score: 1

    After all, don't they keep it pure?

    Or, if you believe Futurama, it'll be a dead language in a thousand years...

  5. The Long Now has already looked at this... by Bookwyrm · · Score: 5, Informative

    These waste management folks might want to look at the Rosetta Disk project:
        http://rosettaproject.org/disk/concept/

    It's, you know, a disk meant to store information for a very long time.

  6. Language by bjoast · · Score: 2

    Do not use french!

    1. Re:Language by nicomede · · Score: 1

      Je ne vois pas pourquoi. Dans un million d'années, le français et l'anglais seront deux langues mortes. Votre commentaire est raciste.

    2. Re:Language by ixidor · · Score: 1

      non a french speaker, all i got was: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyu2jAD6sdo "that's racist"

    3. Re:Language by nicomede · · Score: 1

      Basically that 1 million year from now English and French will both be dead...

  7. Duh by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those control crystals from SG1.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  8. Cheaper way to do it by meglon · · Score: 5, Funny

    For 24,999 they can use my idea.... mosquito legs lined up in binary with tree sap poured over it. It'll last millions of years, with the small glitch of not hardening for some odd millions of those years. Maybe by then they can extract the DNA of the mosquito's and clone some truly exotic animals.... like Pee Wee Herman.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  9. Also watch this film... by djnanite · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Into Eternity" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/nov/11/into-eternity-film-review), which documents the staggering engineering requirements of creating a nuclear bunker designed to last a million times longer than any man made object ever created.

    The scale of the work involved is almost beyond comprehension. And a hard disk is just a fraction of that work.

    It will blow your mind.

    1. Re:Also watch this film... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Odds are very good that both Voyager and both Pioneer spacecraft will outlast this particular idea. Interstellar space is a good preserver unless you hit something. And at a glance, the bunker's lifespan of 100,000 years is only about 20-25 times the lifespan of the Great Sphinx at Giza.

      I found the quote about making the vault "independent of human nature" to be amusing. They're going to put nuclear fuel in there. That's going to be of considerable value to future humans (unless humans or whatever maintain no more than a preindustrial society for the next hundred thousand years) and hence, make the project somewhat futile for its intended purpose, but in a useful way.

    2. Re:Also watch this film... by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      The sphinx isn't doing so well, and was completely buried in sand for a lot of that time. And the pyramids behind it are little more than enormous piles of rubble. As long as the slop is less than the critical angle for the material in question, it's no surprise that they would last a long time....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Also watch this film... by Drishmung · · Score: 2

      Odds are very good that both Voyager and both Pioneer spacecraft will outlast this particular idea. Interstellar space is a good preserver unless you hit something.

      IOW, store it in the cloud---the Oort Cloud.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    4. Re:Also watch this film... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It'd be of more value to preindustrials. A slow-killing, undetectable poison that can work through nothing more than proximity? That's perfect for stealth assassination. Or even mass-assassination. Cast it into a sculpture (I suggest a horse) and give it to your enemies in tribute to their gods. Let their priests spend an hour every day in worship before it.

    5. Re:Also watch this film... by citizenr · · Score: 1

      "Into Eternity" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/nov/11/into-eternity-film-review), which documents the staggering engineering requirements of creating a nuclear bunker designed to last a million times longer than any man made object ever created.

      Yes, lets build a bunker to store FUEL. Fuel that is not being used for political reasons. Fuel, that we will probably need in 100-200 years when oil disappears.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    6. Re:Also watch this film... by khallow · · Score: 1

      A slow-killing, undetectable poison that can work through nothing more than proximity?

      And maybe kills them in 40 years? I think that's a bit overrated as a poison. Might as well give your enemies lead-lined wine vessels.

    7. Re:Also watch this film... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Depends how radioactive the stuff is, and how long-term your planning. Not hugely so, if it needs storing so long, but if your tribe is thinking long-term conquest it would seem a perfectly good strategy to weaken your enemies by giving them a shiny gold amulet for their king in tribute which causes him to fall seriously ill and die after a few years - and he may even pass it on to his successors. Keep them uncoordinated and in an occasional state of civil war, and seriously hurt their morale when they eventually realize a century later that a 'divine curse' is coming upon every ruler.

    8. Re:Also watch this film... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Depends how radioactive the stuff is, and how long-term your planning.

      Both which cut into the value of the "poison". It's an interesting idea, but I don't think it's as valuable as you first indicated.

  10. Esperanto! by fish+waffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    The lingua-franca of tomorrow.

    1. Re:Esperanto! by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Kompreneble!

    2. Re:Esperanto! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Latin's done that job—and better—for more than two thousand years. If you're going to seriously use Esperanto for something so long-term, make sure it's mutually intelligible.

      Personally I'd vote for Munch's The Scream, like was proposed at one point. Maybe with some H. R. Giger to really spook them.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Esperanto! by JSG · · Score: 1

      Why do you describe Esperanto as the French language? (OK Frankish language)

    4. Re:Esperanto! by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      French? Please, we're talking about tomorrow, not yesterday.

      Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lingua_francas

    5. Re:Esperanto! by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      I think images are the way to go, though I'd be more inclined to have some sort of pictograms with text below to show what particular nouns and verbs mean instead of classic works of art.

      I also think that storing things in realspace--graven images on metal--is far better than encoding it on a hard disk. Part of me can't help but wonder if ancient civilizations had more technology than we realize; if the things we regard as bits of detritus aren't packed with meaning. After all, if a pre-computing society got hold of a hard drive, what would they make of it? There couldn't possibly be thousands of volumes of information engraved on something you can hold in the palm of your hand, could there?

      The rest of me realizes this is likely nonsense, but it is food for thought.

    6. Re:Esperanto! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It sadly is. But when you're suffering from sleep deprivation, there's always von Daniken to laugh about!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    7. Re:Esperanto! by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Yes, in a million years, people will be able to read the information in esperanto, which they will all speak, on their linux desktops in their flying cars.

    8. Re:Esperanto! by ronabop · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the Incan images? Terrifying stuff, and yet, we have turned their sites into tourist destinations.

    9. Re:Esperanto! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Sure, but only because we knew for certain that the images were merely superstitious. If you make a box with micron-perfect edges and then laser a giant death symbol on it, unless the source is discredited completely it's probably going to be taken more seriously than the temple grounds of a religion no one believes in any more.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    10. Re:Esperanto! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      The word 'lingua franca' literally means 'french language'.

      Literally, yes. For everyone else:

      lingua franca |li ng gw fra ng k|
      noun ( pl. lingua francas )
      a language that is adopted as a common language between speakers whose native languages are different.
        historical a mixture of Italian with French, Greek, Arabic, and Spanish, formerly used in the Levant.
      ORIGIN late 17th cent.: from Italian, literally ‘Frankish tongue.’

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  11. Etchings? by demonbug · · Score: 2

    Platinum etchings sandwiched between two layers of sapphire. Like microfilm, but with etchings. So now we can write all sorts of shit down, but where do we put it so we know whoever is digging will stop and figure out what it says?

    Personally I think the need for millions of years of survivability are stupid. We've been using atomic energy for what, 60 years? I think we might find a way to put the "waste" to use long before we have to worry about such long-term data storage. That, and we'll either be advanced enough to repair radiation-induced damage in the next couple of hundred years, or civilization will have fallen and our life spans will be so short that a little radiological damage won't really matter.

    1. Re:Etchings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pfft the Curse of the Ancients is merely quaint superstition...

    2. Re:Etchings? by jgotts · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Platinum etchings sandwiched between two layers of sapphire. Like microfilm, but with etchings. So now we can write all sorts of shit down, but where do we put it so we know whoever is digging will stop and figure out what it says?

      Personally I think the need for millions of years of survivability are stupid. We've been using atomic energy for what, 60 years? I think we might find a way to put the "waste" to use long before we have to worry about such long-term data storage. That, and we'll either be advanced enough to repair radiation-induced damage in the next couple of hundred years, or civilization will have fallen and our life spans will be so short that a little radiological damage won't really matter.

      My thought is that within the next few hundred years we'll be recovering resources from landfills and all sorts of spaces too toxic to deal with now.

      Already we're dealing with polluted industrial sites. We'll become more and more efficient with that. We'll start to become very efficient at remining rare earths out of landfills and it will cascade from there.

    3. Re:Etchings? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Sapphires are too expensive. You could just etch some Twinkies, or hotdogs.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Etchings? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Funny

      They said readable in a million years, not edible in a million years. Do you really want some redneck to stumble upon the warning twinkie stash a few thousand years from now and swallow all the information? I thought not. ;-)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Etchings? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Personally I think the need for millions of years of survivability are stupid. We've been using atomic energy for what, 60 years? I think we might find a way to put the "waste" to use long before we have to worry about such long-term data storage.

      We already know how, we have much of the technology, and all of the theory. We're not doing it because it's more cost-effective for corporations to dig up more and sell it than to reprocess what's there, apparently, but that can be fixed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Etchings? by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not a nuclear physicist, and I could be wrong, but isn't the rule of thumb something along the lines of the shorter a half-life an isotope has, the more dangerous it is? Something that decays to another element in a few seconds (or less) is emitting radiation like crazy whereas something that has a half-life of several million years seems practically stable by comparison.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    7. Re:Etchings? by trout007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Close. Most things that undergo radioactive decay become other radioactive elements and different particles of various energies. You have to look at the whole decay chain to find out where the bad ones are.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    8. Re:Etchings? by trout007 · · Score: 1
      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    9. Re:Etchings? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      I'm not a nuclear physicist, and I could be wrong, but isn't the rule of thumb something along the lines of the shorter a half-life an isotope has, the more dangerous it is?

      Yep, and it's also more useful. That's why (s)he wanted to use it in RTGs. The other thing is that when you "burn" it in a breeder reactor, the quantity of waste is reduced by a factor of 20 or better. So it's more hazardous, more useful, shorter lived, and far less of it.

    10. Re:Etchings? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      We already have a use for waste that is capable of releasing dangerous levels of radiation for millions of years. That use is, "fuel." We just have to have the political will to use breeders and reprocess the waste to pull out the bits that prevent fission. There's no technical reason why we should have to be worried about storing anything for millions of years.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Etchings? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Rather than go to all the trouble of risking long term data storage, and whether or not someone is going to find and decode the warning before they dig into the burial vault, why not just dig a really deep hole or two and bury it? At 10+ km down, it's not going to be affecting anyone's drinking water. Erosion isn't going to get at it. Even an asteroid on a direct collision course with the planet might have a hard time reaching it, and if it did, the handful of radioactive waste thrown into the environment would be the least of the worries.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Etchings? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      Yep. Bismuth, for example, has a half life measured in quadrillions of years, and is so safe it's sold over the counter for internal use.

      Chemical poisons such as arsenic and mercury stay toxic forever, and somehow nobody seems to worry about labeling places where they get dumped.

    13. Re:Etchings? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      pu239 (weapons grade pu) is not useful in RTGs... pu240 is.

      but the good news is all you need to do is leave the spent fuel in the reactor longer and you'll get much more pu240 than pu239, and you can't make weapons out of that shit, and you can't separate the two meaningfully either.

    14. Re:Etchings? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      ack! i wasted all my mods yesterday! this made me laugh.

    15. Re:Etchings? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      it's a real world case of dependency hell. in order to get a license to make new reactors, the new reactors need to be proven in the field, and you can't prove them in the field unless you build them...

      there's a reason there's not been any drastically new designs actually built since the cold war started winding down, and the military suddenly didn't need to keep building their own untested designs.

      maybe we need a 2nd cold war just so the militaries can bypass the hostile regulatory environment and prove some better designs?

      who'd have thought that government could be the only thing that trumps regulation? the Randroids here will have a fit!

    16. Re:Etchings? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Rather than go to all the trouble of risking long term data storage, and whether or not someone is going to find and decode the warning before they dig into the burial vault, why not just dig a really deep hole or two and bury it? At 10+ km down, it's not going to be affecting anyone's drinking water.

      Because we don't have the technology to make large holes 10+ km deep, and if we did, we could simply tap geothermal energy and not have this problem in the first place.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:Etchings? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Because we don't have the technology to make large holes 10+ km deep

      So dig many small holes near the limits of our current tech then.

      Anyone coming along who can get at it should have the equivalent technological ability. If you can get down as deep as us, you'll have a good reason for having that drilling tech, such as looking for minerals. If you're looking for minerals you should be able to analyse them. If you're analysing them, and you've got tech that can go as deep as us, you should be aware of radioactive elements. If you spread it out to many small boreholes, there's not going to be a large concentration of 'interesting' stuff in one spot detectable from the surface without good tech.

      So dig a deep hole and be done with it.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    18. Re:Etchings? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      My thought is that within the next few hundred years we'll be recovering resources from landfills and all sorts of spaces too toxic to deal with now.

      Probably not. The problem isn't that the places are too toxic, but that the concentration of anything economically valuable on it's own is way, way, too low. Absent a breakthrough that drops the cost of recovery several orders of magnitude (which I think is very unlikely), it's simply not economically viable.

    19. Re:Etchings? by Necroloth · · Score: 1

      why not build a rocket and aim for the sun?

  12. Language by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1

    I would suggest Lojban so nobody gets confused what we were trying to say

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  13. Two words: Grave Robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nobody would think of hunting down a sapphire and platinum artefact just because it has intrinsic value, right?

  14. The universal geek language: by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Porn. Of course at €25000, that's very expensive porn.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  15. Re:COBOL? by belthize · · Score: 1

    I was going to say FORTRAN but COBOL should work.

  16. They by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

    They really need to fuck with the future archaeologists by writing everything in Klingon.

    1. Re:They by Soporific · · Score: 1

      +1 - I would love to hear the conversation when they found it.

      ~S

    2. Re:They by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      nah. they need to use belter or puppeteer. Xinti would also work though the easiest would be to show the damn borg where the damn supository is.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  17. Are these people insane? by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?
    The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

    I can find out precisely when a building was built, sold, and how many times it was repaired, just by visiting the online city hall archives.
    Not only that, I can get a map of my city for every century, and then some. Everything that ever happened here since God knows when. Like 1850 or so? I can get a list of all the people that lived in any given place since the 16th century, when the Church started keeping track of baptismal records. Online.

    Why would things ever stop being archived and kept track of? Seriously. Are we going to have a nuclear war or something?
    The whole archive would probably fit on a USB pen drive. Making 1000 copies every year would be a rounding error on the city's budget.

    1. Re:Are these people insane? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?

      By assuming the possibility of a catastrophic event, such as a nuclear war, a comet strike, a particularly nasty pandemic, or a dozen other things that can set civilization back significantly.

      The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      Both Romans and Greeks wrote down a lot of things (which is why we know a great deal about them), but that did not preclude a large period of dark ages following their civilization, where a lot of what they wrote - and especially the day to day stuff like a "city hall archives" - was lost.

    2. Re:Are these people insane? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      By assuming the possibility of a catastrophic event, such as a nuclear war, a comet strike, a particularly nasty pandemic, or a dozen other things that can set civilization back significantly.

      Oh... great... so if that happens then... question: How the heck are we going to read the data off the million year hard drive?

      A million year hard drive is kind of pointless without a million year reading device attached to it

      A more reliable way to mark the locations of hazardous waste disposal, would be to carve "universal" danger messages in durable substances such as rock, and bury them all over the waste sites

      And build large structures out of rock near waste disposal areas, designed in a shape to convey a danger message, and durable enough to withstand earthquakes and thousands of years worth of wear and tear caused by the elements.

    3. Re:Are these people insane? by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?
      The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      I can find out precisely when a building was built, sold, and how many times it was repaired, just by visiting the online city hall archives.

      Good for you, you live in a new country from the sounds of it.

      . Everything that ever happened here since God knows when. Like 1850 or so?

      I'd give you +1 Funny.

      1850 isn't that long ago. Hell the house I live in is nothing special and is from the 1700s. Haven't been able to find out precisely when it was built though.

      Information that's not used tends to decay. There's some data on the king of England in 1200 [but what's true and what's false?], but not much data on anyone else in the country back then, even your local lord, let alone Bob the village idiot.

    4. Re:Are these people insane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Are these people insane? by oracleofbargth · · Score: 2

      It's not a hard drive, it's the equivalent of a microfiche, which can be read with a big enough magnifying glass.

    6. Re:Are these people insane? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Oh... great... so if that happens then... question: How the heck are we going to read the data off the million year hard drive?

      A million year hard drive is kind of pointless without a million year reading device attached to it

      You can always attach something younger to it, say a two month old reading device. I bet it'd work a lot better too. The data needs to be in a format that lasts that long. Frankly, you don't even need a reading device to go with it. Let those future people make their own device.

    7. Re:Are these people insane? by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      Now I'm imagining a bunch of future explorers / treasure hunters / archeologists shrugging off the curse of the ancient ruins as pure superstition. Coincidentally all to die several years later from a horrible sickness along with anyone the artifacts came into contact with.

    8. Re:Are these people insane? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Why would things ever stop being archived and kept track of? Seriously. Are we going to have a nuclear war or something? The whole archive would probably fit on a USB pen drive. Making 1000 copies every year would be a rounding error on the city's budget.

      Well, we might have something like that. That hard drive in your machine, how long is it going to last? If you power it down, how long is it actually usable? Those spares, how good is the shelf live? HDDs fail, CDs and DVDs fade away and USB pen drives will lose their charge if put in storage and almost nobody has a tape drive. The whole "copy to new media" assume we will have a continuous, uninterrupted flow of cheap storage, stable power and people with nothing better to do. Just imagine we had WWII all over again, 1939-1945 is six years where you probably can't get spares because there's slightly more important things like a war going on.

      And after Thailand and Japan is in ruins you could probably add years rebuilding the components and the plants and the infrastructure required, say a good 10 years where nobody could give a shit about city hall records from the 1850s. I expect that without replacements most of my data would be dead and gone like a fart in the wind because the backups are all out as well. Whatever is important and printable I'd probably print out but I can't very well print terabytes and there's no way to print a video. In short, I'm entirely dependent on modern society to keep the amount of data that I do. While a million years sound like overkill, I can understand products to last hundreds of years.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Are these people insane? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The transience of history 1000 years ago has no relevance to today, nor 1000 years from now. The printing press has only been around for half that time. History is not cyclical, nor continuous. The situation on earth has never been even remotely like it is now, with this huge population. This is a unique moment, where there is such a thing as history (which essentially did not exist before written language), but it is still young. We are in unexplored territory.

    10. Re:Are these people insane? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?
      The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      Funny, last time I looked, an awful lot of archeology was being done about places and times where people wrote a lot of things down. Like, for example, recent Roman discoveries.

      The reason for archeology is that A) a lot of what's written is lies, hearsay, propaganda, misconceptions, exageration for entertainment purposes, etc. Or perhaps, you'd forgotten Atlantis?

      And B) even the best records are perishable. Periodically we lose large quantities of vital statistics when a town hall or hospital burns down or gets nuked by a tornado.

      Which is why they're looking at keeping "eternal" records on sapphire instead of on Post-it Notes. So that something useful will be found on the site of the former New York City.

    11. Re:Are these people insane? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      ...but not much data on anyone else in the country back then, even your local lord, let alone Bob the village idiot.

      I thought his name was Jorge Manuel? See it was only 18 minutes between comments and that info decayed!

    12. Re:Are these people insane? by gr8_phk · · Score: 2

      One good EMP and all your information is lost. You read slashdot, didn't you see the article the other day about an upper atmospheric test that zapped stuff 900 miles away? And that was relatively small compared to what's possible. Just a few of those and all electronics information not specially protected will be erased. Oh, or a giant solar flare can do the same - should you think people can actually behave themselves for 100,000 years. OTOH if we nuke ourselves, what's the difference if we leave some extra nuclear waste lying around for the survivors to find later ;-) They still find conventional bombs in europe all the time.

    13. Re:Are these people insane? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      But will it stay like this? Suppose World War 3 breaks out in the year 2173 and most countries suffer horribly before it ends. Technology could be pushed back centuries and records of pre-war times could be lost. Especially if those records didn't suit the purposes of the war's winner. (Not to Godwin the thread, but imagine if Hitler had won WW2. Do you think we'd be reading of all the horrible things he did or would we read about how he's the best person in all of history?)

      Don't assume that increased record-keeping of recent years will inevitably lead to perfect record-keeping for all time in the future. A lot can happen in 10 years, much less in a million years.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    14. Re:Are these people insane? by ameoba · · Score: 2

      Consider the time scale we're working with here. Ancient Rome only stood for about a thousand years. The subsequent dark ages lasted about 700. Humans have only really been building "civilizations" for about 15,000 years. We're talking about recording information for stuff that might be dangerous for twice that long. We need to communicate with people that are further away from us than the people who discovered ceramics.

      That's a lot of time for things to horribly wrong. While €25,000 seems like a lot of money for a drive, it's really small peanuts compared to the overall costs of storing the waste. On top of that, right now is the best time to invest that money - when we have resources & the stability to undertake the project. If civilization were ever to crumble, we'd probably be a little distracted & not in a good place to put permanent warnings up that don't require maintenance.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    15. Re:Are these people insane? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Why would things ever stop being archived and kept track of? Seriously. Are we going to have a nuclear war or something?

      Or something. Over the next million years, a severe meteor strike or several are highly likely, and several supervolcano eruptions a virtual certainty, as are a hell of a lot of global wars. We got from the origin of language (inferred) to the internet in 50,000 years. A million years is enough for that twenty times over. Since even a global nuclear war would likely set us back a few centuries at the outside, we could have dozens of them between now and then.

      (Of course, the argument could be made that if we melt our civilization to radioactive slag, the question of where we have buried a few tons of nuclear waste becomes somewhat redundant.)

    16. Re:Are these people insane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, nuclear war breaks out and levels civilization, leaving most places on earth radioactive and unlivable, and eliminating written records. That would really make it worthwhile for us to spend a fortune on advanced storage schemes so the future Mad Max inhabitants don't accidentally run across something buried that might be *gasp* radioactive.

    17. Re:Are these people insane? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?
      The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      I can find out precisely when a building was built, sold, and how many times it was repaired, just by visiting the online city hall archives.
      Not only that, I can get a map of my city for every century, and then some. Everything that ever happened here since God knows when. Like 1850 or so? I can get a list of all the people that lived in any given place since the 16th century, when the Church started keeping track of baptismal records. Online.

      The broad outlines may be written down, but a remarkable amount can be lost in a short time. Here is an example of an 18th-c. cemetery in NYC that nobody knew was there. Here is an article discussing 19th-c. finds in San Francisco. The Steamboat Arabia in the Kansas City area wasn't forgotten, but it was lost for well over a century; when it was finally excavated the artifacts within gave a great deal of previously unkown information about pioneer life. This isn't exactly ancient Rome we're talking about! Even events within living memory often require archaeological techniques to fill in the historical gaps.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    18. Re:Are these people insane? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology?
      The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      I can find out precisely when a building was built, sold, and how many times it was repaired, just by visiting the online city hall archives.

      I wish I could be as optimistic, but I have a pretty cynical view of human nature. The human race lobotomized itself after two thousand years of scientific and mathematical development because a significantly large number of people decided that nothing in this world is important and that loving Jesus is the only thing that matters. Libraries were destroyed, people were burnt at the stake, and we went from civilization back to being afraid of the dark because TEH DEBBIL!!1 might come and get us.

      What has happened before can happen again. And where the phenomenon of doing insane things because Jebus tells you to is concerned, well the USA is only ever one rich charismatic white Christian demagogue away from Dark Ages Mk II.

    19. Re:Are these people insane? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Spot the guy who hasn't read the article or watched the video.

    20. Re:Are these people insane? by lennier · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Are we going to have a nuclear war or something?

      Maybe..

      "the MI6 chief said it was now likely [Iran] would achieve their goal by 2014, making a military strike from the US and Israel increasingly likely."

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    21. Re:Are these people insane? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Are we going to have a nuclear war or something?

      Dear Sir, what ROCK do you live under?

      To answer your question: yes, probably.

      If we don't (a) destroy the ecosphere and wipe out our species (b) get squished by some random planet-buster from space, (c) insert other hypothetical-but-not-incredibly-unlikely-over-a-million-year-timespan catastrophe here, first.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    22. Re:Are these people insane? by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      There are archeologists studying things a couple of decades in the past.
      Information gets lost, information is written with bias.

      Revising history and not trusting records fully is necessary when trying to glimpse the truth.

    23. Re:Are these people insane? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      It will probably not last that long because the Chinese will buy it within 30 years because they'll need it to fuel their breeder reactors.
      Nevertheless this is a decent back-up plan.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    24. Re:Are these people insane? by deoxyribonucleose · · Score: 2

      But most of what's printed right now won't last more than a hundred years since the paper will crumble. http://www.loc.gov/preservation/resources/care/deterioratebrochure.html

      Worse, an increasing proportion of what's being written is on electronic media, known for its longevity in neither technology nor formatting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_dark_age

      The claim that history has no relevance has a long history of being proven wrong. Superficials change. The basics don't: people die, and information decays.

    25. Re:Are these people insane? by Waccoon · · Score: 2

      I find it hard to believe that absolutely everything in our garbage dumps or oceans could be collected and destroyed with such precision and effectiveness. These days, reading and writing isn't a skill belonging only to the elite, so it would be fairly easy for ordinary people to keep a large cache of information preserved against the will of the rulers for quite a few generations. If there's a cataclysmic event that kills most of humanity, the "cleanup" will be next to impossible given the tons of stuff that simply washes up on the beach every year.

      Of course, I'm assuming more than a few thousand people from a 1st world country will survive. The higher the death toll, the more likely people will be valuing food and shelter over the preservation of history.

    26. Re:Are these people insane? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that absolutely everything in our garbage dumps or oceans could be collected and destroyed with such precision and effectiveness.

      And without any effort by us to hasten things. We don't store our data on six pack rings, but on far more perishable media. Any period of time that is purely digital/virtual will probably disappear unless someone makes a deliberate attempt to store knowledge of that time in a more permanent format.

    27. Re:Are these people insane? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      There will be no future archaeologists. How can they assume a huge cultural discontinuity that would require archaeology? The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

      Hardly. One, they'll probably be interested in what we aren't writing down. The most common things are usually never documented because they are so common and no one thought they needed to be documented. Two, we lie and only write down what we want people to know, or at best with what we have deluded ourselves to believe.

  18. Nuclear waste will be the crude oil of the future! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a few years, we'll be drilling for nuclear waste to power our flying cars! Just like how the cave men buried dinosaur waste, which we now pump out as petroleum to power our driving cars.

    Future folks will be overjoyed to find an old nuclear waste dump buried on their property, because they will get rich by fracking it! Sapphire disks will be like old, dusty grizzled-prospectors' maps, and be highly valued.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  19. Something that everyone can understand? by Slugster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about, Oh, I dunno. A pictorial map? With a human skull marking each site?

    They may dig up one, but after that they should be able to figure out what the other sites are.

    1. Re:Something that everyone can understand? by Bucky24 · · Score: 2

      That's the point OP is trying to make. Even if this did happen, after digging up the first nuclear waste site they'd realize that the sign of a human skull means "this is bad, stay away"

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    2. Re:Something that everyone can understand? by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about, Oh, I dunno. A pictorial map? With a human skull marking each site?

      Pirate treasure! Let's dig it up!

      Yeah, that'll work.

    3. Re:Something that everyone can understand? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      How about, Oh, I dunno. A pictorial map? With a human skull marking each site? They may dig up one, but after that they should be able to figure out what the other sites are.

      I was going to suggest asking Tufte but your idea definitely deserves a "6" because it was certainly one smarter than the rest so far...

  20. Tomb Raiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So when someone steals it to sell it for scrap for the sapphire and platinum, then what do the people 1000 years from now do?

    1. Re:Tomb Raiders by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      sapphire scrap isn't worth anything. It's just plain old aluminum oxide. Sapphire gemstones, maybe, but it's not like you could melt down a film of sapphire and cast a new gemstone from it, and if you're planning to use it to synthesize new sapphire gemstones, the raw materials are all over the place in easier to obtain forms.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  21. 20th Century English by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Funny

    If my TeeVee has taught me anything, it's that no matter how far into the future or past we go--even if we travel to other worlds--everybody speaks 20th Century English.

  22. Doesn't it describe it's own contents? by Zadaz · · Score: 1

    Are we assuming that diggers in the future won't have a Gieger counter?

    And if we're assuming that they won't then we can't make any assumptions about communicating with them in any way.

    Just put a skull and crossbones on it and call it a day. If the digging civilization doesn't have skulls or bones, then that's their own problem.

    1. Re:Doesn't it describe it's own contents? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      That's definitely one approach, at least it'll make them associate that particular symbol with 'unexplainable death' even if they don't have the skull and crossbones symbology. But people don't tend to like the idea of letting a few hundred/thousand people die so they can learn their lesson; that's why they're trying to prevent people going there in the first place!

      I think the best approach is to make sure that the only way to find it is to make the access mechanism itself depend on an understanding of strong ionizing radiation. Barring that, simply make it so damn impossible to get into that it requires a civilization as advanced as we are to be able to even get in, assuming that if a civilization got really good at digging, cutting, and otherwise "gaining access", they'd also have stumbled on radiation.

      Think about it. What if we found, with our most advanced techniques, some sort of buried underground vault that was clearly intentional? You know we'd be going inside, but we'd be so scared shitless about what might be in there that we'd run literally every test we know of, which is a lot. We've pretty much sussed out the elemental forces of the universe by now. If we can make sure that a civilization that was able to find it couldn't help but know something about radioactivity, no symbols should be necessary. Either it wouldn't bother them (some sort of weird mutant alien race or something), or they'd know to look for it.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  23. Disturbing by x181 · · Score: 2

    FTA: "Most countries with nuclear power stations agree that the solution for dealing with long-lived nuclear waste is to store it deep inside the earth, about 500 meters below the surface." Nothing new but I still find it disturbing that we do this.

    1. Re:Disturbing by khallow · · Score: 1

      What? Agree on things? I don't think that's a problem around here.

    2. Re:Disturbing by x181 · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*

  24. Pictures + Math by bpkiwi · · Score: 2

    Pictures are very universal. Cave drawings of people hunting animals were immediately understood by people who discovered them. Put in blueprints of the site layout, use atomic model images to denote where material was stored, in what, etc.

    Math is also very easy to convey graphically, especially binary. You just have to include a big 'key' at the start to define your symbols. Start with "0 1 10 11" (0,1,2,3) followed by "01 + 01 = 10" (1+1=2) to give the symbols for addition and equality, then multiplication ("10 x 10 = 100"), etc. Once you have the basics it will be easy to convey everything from atomic numbers to dates.

  25. If Slashdotters had their way... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

    A million years? You just the first phrase will be: "I, for one, welcome our future overlords..."

    Amusingly that'll also be the first +5 post when Slashdot covers the unearthing of this drive.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  26. A few simple steps to get started by Cyphase · · Score: 2

    1) Write multiple warnings and translate them all into every language you can manage. This has the side-effect of being a Rosetta Stone.
    2) Draw pictures of humans and other living things suffering the effects of radiation poisoning (and other death images, for good measure).
    3) Draw the atomic structure of uranium, plutonium, etc. You could also try drawing fusion/fission/etc. Go crazy.
    4) Make it really, really, really hard to get in.
    5) Anyone who still gets in is either advanced enough that they'll be safe or dumb enough that they don't deserve to survive.

    BONUS STEP: Keep maintaining it so the only way it'll ever become a problem is if humanity gets so close to extinction that by the time they would even get close to getting in, language will have changed so much that they might not understand the written warnings. Or the pictures.

    Don't worry about the aliens. If they can get here, I think they'll probably be fine.

    --
    by Cyphase ( 907627 )
    1. Re:A few simple steps to get started by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

      You mean like the "mummy's curse" or a million other death threats that ancient cultures showed for their tombs filled with riches? If you dig up a structure that is:

      A) Ancient

      B) Hard to get into

      C) Filled with all sorts of warning messages

      Would you think that it was:

      A) A dangerous death trap

      Or

      B) A place where the ancients held their treasure.

      I guess that most people would choose B.

      In all honesty though, I think that this is a moot point, if civilization collapses, basic principles such as how to make a Geiger counter and radioactivity would most likely survive the collapse or at least be rediscovered before people would be drilling into nuclear waste storage sites.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:A few simple steps to get started by jedwidz · · Score: 1

      You nailed it, this whole idea is stupid.

      So future archaeologists are digging around for, y'know, interesting and valuable stuff, and they come across an ancient, beautiful and mysterious artifact made out of valuable materials.

      Their immediate response is - of course - to stop digging, re-bury the artifact, and never go near the place again.

      Yeah, right.

    3. Re:A few simple steps to get started by SuperSlacker64 · · Score: 1

      Missed step:

      6) PROFIT!

    4. Re:A few simple steps to get started by Cyphase · · Score: 1

      The curses on tombs didn't work because people didn't believe in them. If some future civilization doesn't believe in radiation, well, sucks for them.

      --
      by Cyphase ( 907627 )
  27. We'd be like their Ancient Precursors by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    And they'd argue about whether we were aliens, and if we knew magic. Pretty cool.

    Also, as long as the information was written in a sufficient number of languages, with diagrams, our descendants should be able to figure it out. We probably would, if there were a million-year-old written record.

    1. Re:We'd be like their Ancient Precursors by lennier · · Score: 1

      And they'd argue about whether we were aliens, and if we knew magic.

      It's rumoured that the Ancients' civilisation collapsed when they began dabbling in the darkest of proscribed arts - the Black Speech, or PHP.

      But most reputable xenoarcheologists consider this to be just a silly myth invented to scare young Intercal programmers.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    2. Re:We'd be like their Ancient Precursors by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      <?
      set_magic_quotes_runtime();
      sign_of_kish();
      $im = clay_tablet_create();
      inscribe_clay_tablet($im);
      summon_cthulhu("Iä! Iä!");
        ?>

      (The scariest line of this is probably the first.)

  28. Hmph! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    If they can't read English in 1,000,000 years then I say "Fuck'em!"

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  29. Wrong methods by dissy · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't want a single medium that will both last a thousand years as well as not at all be read again for a thousand years.

    What you want is a medium that will last a minimum of a couple years, then before a couple years pass copy that data to a new medium device, making updates and translations as needed.

    If each generation updates the records more than once, keeping things updated with whatever language changes end up happening over time, then the Content will last thousands of years, yet the medium will not be required to survive longer than a few years.

    Then we don't have to make assumptions about the language that will be required a thousand years from now. It will become that over time. The only language to start it with are languages of today.

    Our current hard drive technology can do this already.
    Store multiple copies on multiple drives. Make damn sure the data will get copied and updated before all of them fail. Always copy onto a new hard drive.
    It is reasonable to expect future storage devices to only last longer than current ones, not less.
    Keep copying over to the newest and best available at that moment. Never neglect it for too long.

    1. Re:Wrong methods by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Updating the language may cause a chinese whispers effect; changing the meaning of what was written. We don't want newspeak in the future - intended or not.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
  30. umm, seems overly complicated by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    we don't need to write down anything, nor store anything. this is yet another dumb problem with a very easy non-technological solution, that needn't any gadgetry.

    we have plenty of information from tens of thousands of years ago. you'd think that archeologists would be familiar with them. They're called rocks.

    Bury the nuclear wasted wherever you like, and put a big ugly rock on top of it. and not a round one. I promise, it'll stay there for as long as the waste does.

    In a million years, assuming everyone forgot, someone will ask why these weird rocks are everywhere. and then they'll dig beneath one, and find out pretty damn fast.

    it's a rock, not a hard place.

  31. Stone tablets by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    I was once thinking, if you cut tiny dots of 0.1mm in size in stone tablets, then it might be just visible with primitive tools and preserve a long while.

    A stone tablet of one square meter could store 100 megabit that way!

    Useful?

  32. "Wow, sapphire and plantinum!" by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "We'd better keep digging--there might be more valuable stuff down here!"

    1. Re:"Wow, sapphire and plantinum!" by clintp · · Score: 1

      Sapphire and platinum? Where do I dig?

      It's stupid to use valuable (or even things that *look* valuable) as warning markers. Pharaohs were buried with jewels and gold, and look how many of their graves survived intact for just a couple of thousand years. As long as there's even a rumor of a payoff, people *will* dig them up even if the ground is cursed. Or radioactive.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
  33. That's easy by dlb · · Score: 1

    Durker durr!

  34. This isn't hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We can assume anyone that reads it, even post-apocalypse, is at least roughly as intelligent as we are, even if their society is set back a bit. You need to include primers. The first engravings should be larger (no special / microscopic instruments required, low density), and go through a pictorial primer explaining the numbers, then basic math, then basic language. From there you can advance to "how to build crude instruments to read higher density disks", and then in the higher density disks you can write oodles of detailed information, starting with more advanced primers on our language and culture.

    This is the same basic problem as communications with distant aliens. Except if you expect the reader to at least be our historical descendants, you could include an additional cheatsheet: a rosetta stone of some of the primer info in 10-15 different popular languages of today, in hopes that some vestige of one of the languages survives (or has managed to be preserved in historical studies, or perhaps bears enough resemblance to a modern descendant language that it's relatively easy for them to decode it).

  35. Re:Nuclear waste will be the crude oil of the futu by tmosley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, this is quite true. LFTRs as they were originally designed were in fact for nuclear powered aircraft. They were the only possible design that was safe enough for such an application.

    Anyone thinking of burying this "waste" is a bleeding buffoon. LFTR consumes nuclear waste to produce usable fuel that is useless for nuclear weapons. It burns nearly 100% of the fuel, and the only leftovers at the end are highly useful for medical applications.

    Watch this, then tell me that we need to engineer million year data storage, much less a million year bunker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK367T7h6ZY

  36. m-disk by millenniata.com already does this by ezakimak · · Score: 2

    http://millenniata.com/
    Produces optical media with a rock-like substrate on optical media--you're literally etching in stone.
    They claim it will last at least 10,000 years.

  37. Re:Nuclear waste will be the crude oil of the futu by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a few years, we'll be drilling for nuclear waste to power our flying cars! Just like how the cave men buried dinosaur waste, which we now pump out as petroleum to power our driving cars.

    Thag: "What we write so no one dig here?"
    Ugg: "Thag crap here. No one go near it."
    Thag: "You funny."
    Ugg: "What? Like it matter in 1825 sunrises!"
    Thag: "OK, How you spell crap?"
    Ugg: "Don't know. Just put small 9 after your name."
    Thag: (Draws in the dirt with a stick, then notices his friend's feet) "Hey, where you get boots?"
    Ugg: "Made them from fake dead animal."

  38. "...perhaps even millions..." by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They have to preserve records of what they've buried and where, not for a few years but for tens of thousands of years, perhaps even millions.

    Horseshit. The hazard is significant for a few hundred years at most. People are not going to dig the stuff up and eat it by the ton.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"...perhaps even millions..." by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Horseshit. The hazard is significant for a few hundred years at most. People are not going to dig the stuff up and eat it by the ton.

      Yup. Within 500 years the waste is less radioactive than the ore from which it was mined. Marking every waste site makes no more sense than marking every vein of naturally occurring uranium ore.

      What makes this especially idiotic, is that in no other area of human activity do we consider the consequences of people this far into the future. We would be way better off spending the money on contraceptives, so we don't use up all the Earth's resources, leaving something for future generations. But instead we are building sapphire disks because there is a 0.0000001% chance that some hard rock miners might be tunneling into Yucca Mountain (which contains no use ore that we know of), 10,000 years from now, and there is a 0.0001% chance that one of these miners might get cancer as a result. That is just absurd.

    2. Re:"...perhaps even millions..." by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. The hazard is significant for a few hundred years at most. People are not going to dig the stuff up and eat it by the ton.

      Yup. Within 500 years the waste is less radioactive than the ore from which it was mined.

      Dont worry, ore itself is officially a DANGEROUS NUCLEAR WASTE and cant be just buried where you got it from. The second you shovel a barrel full of ore out of a mine you need to store it in approved nuclear waste facility.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    3. Re:"...perhaps even millions..." by careysub · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. The hazard is significant for a few hundred years at most. People are not going to dig the stuff up and eat it by the ton.

      Yup. Within 500 years the waste is less radioactive than the ore from which it was mined. Marking every waste site makes no more sense than marking every vein of naturally occurring uranium ore.

      ...

      The specific claim you seem to be making - that a kilogram of spent fuel is less radioactive that a kilogram of natural uranium ore after 500 years of decay - is most definitely not even remotely true.

      It is very easy to see that this cannot possibly be correct when you consider that natural uranium ore is typically 0.1% uranium, and its total radioactivity is about 14 times that of the uranium itself (due to the build-up of radioactive daughter products), thus being roughly equivalent to 1.4% U-238; whereas the spent fuel itself is 85% uranium (being made out pure uranium oxide), and contains ~1% Pu-239 that is ~200,000 times as radioactive as U-238. Even 25,000 years later (one half-life of Pu-239) the fuel is still ~100,000 times as hot as typical uranium ore, and being roughly 1000 times as concentrated as typical natural ore it will never cool to being less than about 1000 times more radioactive - even after ten billion years.

      You are repeating - in garbled form - an argument based in some way on the the total amount of radioactivity, considering intensity (very high by geologic standards) and its mass/volume (very small by geologic standards). But the radioactivity of those containers won't be safe for someone cracking them open until the most of the plutonium has decayed, after a couple of hundred thousand years. Should we care? Perhaps not, but don't pretend there is no hazard if they are dug up.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  39. Don't take risk write both. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Why take risk on something that should be readable in a million years? Write in both ASCII and EBCDIC. But always have the parity bit on.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  40. Use a picture by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Use a picture of a person bending over puking. Then put the symbol of the uranium atom next to it. With 238 protons and neutrons. Then a map of the area where the junk is stored.
    Complete it with a cartoon of a man, a woman, and a child. Then a symbol of uranium with 232 protons and neutrons. And a map of the area with a big X over where the radioactive stuff is.

    In a 100000 years from now, somebody will figure it out.

    Hell, a single Frenchman mastered ancient Egyptian from the Rosetta Stone 180 years ago. People are smart. They will continue to be smart 100,000 years from now. Hopefully smart enough to know not to make radioactive poisons that last a million years.

  41. Why? by sjames · · Score: 1

    In just a tiny fraction of that million years, the waste will be less radioactive than the natural uranium ore deposits we started with. If we refine the FUEL out of the waste stream first, the records only need to last 250-500 years.

  42. Isn't it obvious? by musicon · · Score: 1

    Instead of using any existing language (written or spoken), you use mathematics and pictograms. Essentially the same as how they did the drawing on Voyager.

    Just start with a basic number system, individual atoms, then a description of radiation, time periods, etc. None of those should change within a few million years.

    If you want to give a start and end date, just use a star chart based on the current location of earth with of a few obvious bodies for reference and project it forward.

  43. subduction zone by shentino · · Score: 1

    Just bury it in a subduction zone and let the earth's mantle incinerate it

    1. Re:subduction zone by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, that is banned by international treaty.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  44. Let me get this straight. by Nethead · · Score: 1

    So they have the technology to decode the sapphire discs but don't have the technology for a Geiger counter?

    I see how this plays out:
    They dig up these containment vessels that seem to have been buried very carefully in a remote area behind many protections. These must be the burial chambers of the kings! Let's open them and find the loot! Then a few years later the archaeologists die of a horrid disease. It must be the curse of the mummy!

    Many bad horror films are then made.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight. by mark_osmd · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would think they'd notice something was odd, in the lower parts of the dig the walls would be unusually warm from the waste heat from the waste casks. Any civilization advanced enough to dig up a centuries old waste dump thousands of feet underground would make the connection that the only thing that would make heat like that for all those centuries would have to be nuclear related.

  45. Better Answer - Pictures by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    So put up a picture of the periodic table. Use an "obvious" numbering system - on another page/stone/whatever put several number systems side by side so as to help them figure out the one used on the periodic table. Have a diagram nearby of an atom. Then some diagrams of the buried stuff along with indications which atoms they are composed of. Put a couple materials on the outside that match the diagram, so they can verify the diagrams match the items they've unearthed. Then add some sort of images that depict the nasty elements as hazardous (this seems the most difficult part) so if they don't understand atoms and radiation they can at least get the idea that dangerous stuff be buried there.

    Hard drives my ass, we already have trouble reading stuff from 30 years ago. Pictures is the way to go. Sure, we have trouble deciphering stuff from 3000 years ago, but that's a lot of text. Numbers representing different materials shouldn't be too hard, I suspect the periodic table will be recognizable for some time. And there is only one important message - don't open this stuff.

    1. Re:Better Answer - Pictures by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That only works if civilisation hasn't regressed to the point where the periodic table is in need of rediscovery.

  46. Re:No, not Latin by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Oi moi. I love Koine, and in the ancient world you're certainly right (although I don't think it's quite as important as you say it is in the West by the time of Charlemagne), but Latin would still be a better tool for the job today. Latin's influence (including through Vulgar Latin) and language communities far exceed those of Greek; English has far more Latin than Greek (some estimates say as much as 70% of Classical Latin roots could be found in English somewhere once), and 2168 million people speak English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, or Portuguese, and hence would be well-equipped to interpret words from a Latin root; Greek today cannot claim more than a fifth of that in influence (even generously counting Russian as heavily Greek-influenced), and, anyway, the meanings of the words have changed much more dramatically.

    But, who knows. Maybe deleterion would carry better in a few hundred thousand years than virus. We'll find out, I guess?

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  47. hrmm... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    I thought the old Skull and crossbones was pretty universal?

  48. The product by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's an image of their current prototype sapphire disk.

  49. platinum and sapphire? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

    platinum and sapphire? Then, in a few more years of the two face one body political system we have here causing the fall of civilization after bankrupting us by bombing brown people and tax cuts for billionaires, it'll be a nice target of concentrated wealth. Looters rejoice!

  50. Million year message by quixada · · Score: 1

    Well if they have stuff already that lasts one million years (i.e. the waste) why don't they just use the said waste itself to convey the message? Like write a message using the waste or something like that. Therefore the message lasts as long as it needs to be there...

  51. MC Hammer by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    Needs to do a commemorative "You can't touch this" nuclear edition on sapphire.

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  52. Teach them by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    Teach them the language. Expose 1 gram of the substance, and make one dot. Then label the really hazardous stuff with 100 dots.

    If they can't draw a conclusion from that, maybe they deserve to be irradiated.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  53. Inscribe the warnings on gold tablets. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Interpretation will be up to whatever prophet digs them up.

  54. sapphire not necessarily stable by ridgecritter · · Score: 2

    Sapphire is Al2O3, aluminum oxide (aka alumina). Alumina dissolves in alkaline pH conditions see, for example, http://www.seachem.com/support/AluminumSolubilityToxicity.pdf). It seems likely that over hundreds of milennia, these discs would be exposed to alkaline conditions as a result of varying geochemistry/hydrology.

    Furthermore, sapphire is brittle. Very hard, but brittle. One could break a sapphire disc by dropping it a few feet onto concrete. Over hundreds of milennia, stuff falls, squashes, cracks, etc.

  55. Interesting problem, but it assumes no progress by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

    I'm all for covering contingencies, but if a thousand years pass without the human race developing space flight capability that's safe and reliable enough for us to just pitch the waste into the Sun (or for us just to find a way to re-use the waste), we're a hopeless species anyway.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  56. Absolutely no need and no point by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    In a million years who really cares if an archaeologist accidentally digs into a nuclear waste dump. It will only occur once. Once he or she dies from radiation poisoning everyone else will know to stay away.

    Also, the assumption here is that in a million years humans, aliens, whomever, won't have the technology to detect those dumps. Heck in a million years they could probably be detected and neutralized from orbit.

    1. Re:Absolutely no need and no point by mellyra · · Score: 1

      Also, the assumption here is that in a million years humans, aliens, whomever, won't have the technology to detect those dumps. Heck in a million years they could probably be detected and neutralized from orbit.

      this.

      Human agriculture (which is a good starting point for "civilization") is 7.000-8.000 years old and we worry about transferring information 1.000.000 years into the future?

      imho that's an absurd engineering requirement - build a warning that is guaranteed to last 2.000-3.000 years and you can at least hope that part of our civilization is still recognizable and that the language barrier can be overcome by future researchers; maybe build it to last 10.000 years if you have some sort of Ozymandias-complex.
      But 1m years is almost the same as trying to communicate with aliens.

  57. Re:So what if the disks last 1,000,000 years? by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing you didn't read the article.

    The etching can be read with a microscope. Words and pictographs etched onto the surface....not a computer hard disk.

  58. Three things by bughunter · · Score: 1

    First of all, why do you need to preserve SO much information? Simply put: "This place is poison. Invisible poison will kill you, slowly. You will not feel it, but your hair will fall out, your teeth will bleed, food will not nourish you, and you will sicken and die. Your babies will be deformed, if you have any at all. For your own safety, leave now and do not return. There is nothing of value here." Repeat it in every language currently known. Make it readable by the unaided eye.

    Second, make it truly inaccessible. You're really just digging a hole? Sink it into an undersea tectonic subduction zone. By the time any of the material resurfaces, many millions of years later, it will have decayed into stable isotopes.

    Third, redundancy. You're trying too hard. Platinum and sapphire? Why not solid gold? As others have said, the material is too valuable. Just make plates out of basalt, or basalt fiber, and strew them by the thousands everywhere.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:Three things by mellyra · · Score: 1

      First of all, why do you need to preserve SO much information? Simply put: "This place is poison. Invisible poison will kill you, slowly. You will not feel it, but your hair will fall out, your teeth will bleed, food will not nourish you, and you will sicken and die. Your babies will be deformed, if you have any at all. For your own safety, leave now and do not return. There is nothing of value here." Repeat it in every language currently known. Make it readable by the unaided eye.

      Proto-Indo-European which is basically the earliest point to which we can reconstruct the Indo-European languages was spoken ~4.000 years ago.

      And you think anyone will still understand any language of an existing language/grammar in 1m years?

      Homo Sapiens itself is just ~250.000 years old.

  59. some problems by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    So, you got a drive that lasts for like, EVAAAAAH. Nice. So, in 1000 years, how are you going to hook it up? Seriously. With WHAT interface? SCSI II? RS422? FireWire? And how will that machine have the proper drivers? And will electricity be 110/220v 60Hz AC? Will there BE electricity? So, let's pretend that you have the right cabling and the right interface and somehow either rehab or build a computer that can talk to the drive.

    Nice. OK, and what is on the drive? Some video. And that video is in... QUICKTIME! Got drivers for that? Will your video card (do you even have a video card?) handle this data? etc. etc. etc.

    OK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFmEqeofSWw

    And somehow they have to make sense out of it.

    So, then they find another video

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSd5XTG7HTI

    And now they have to make sense out of that.

    Survey says? No freakin way. What will happen? It's made out of SAPPHIRE and PLATINUM! Holy fuck - STRIP IT. Who cares about DATA. The metal is more valuable....

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  60. Re:We don't need to do anything by c0lo · · Score: 1

    Just toss some glass or obsidian deaths-head skulls into the concrete and the chambers and they'll work it out quickly enough.

    I wonder what an (evolved and intelligent) octopus will understand from a skull presence?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  61. This is a problem already solved. by matunos · · Score: 2

    Just make the Millenarians take care of them.

    1. Re:This is a problem already solved. by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      They'll just select the reality where the necessary language is still spoken. Those guys are lazy that way.

      Anathem is an awesome work.

  62. Guardians by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 1

    Maybe we could hire scientologists to guard the stuff instead. Don't they sign billion-year work contracts?

  63. Cuneiform on Stone by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Cuneiform on stone can be machine readable and writeable and will last a very long time.

    Now I am not talking about The Flintstones type of stuff. I'm talking about something quite a bit more refined but must also be readable by the human eye.

    Roman character are also faily clear for printing and reading as well I suppose...

  64. Well so long as... by die+standing · · Score: 1

    they back it up in the cloud everything should be a-okay ;-)

  65. un-mine it! by LSDelirious · · Score: 3, Interesting

    uranium comes from ore dug out of the ground, at something like 0.1%-1.0% uranium oxide concentrations, so why not just take the radioactive waste and mix it with filler to dilute it down to ore concentrations (suspended in concrete, glass, whatever, something cheap and relatively durable) and drill some really deep holes, deep enough it won't affect any ground water tables, and away from oil fields - ideally near a subduction zone trench where over time the waste would get carried down further into the crust as the waste impregnated plate dives downward. Far out of reach from civilization and in concentrations no more dangerous than already exist in nature. Surely that has to be more cost effective in the long run than maintaining highly guarded secret storage bunkers indefinitely....

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
  66. Re:Nuclear waste will be the crude oil of the futu by Tom · · Score: 1

    Thanks a ton for that link. I didn't know that and now that I do I consider it a big hole in my knowledge.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  67. What language? Here's a thought by gshegosh · · Score: 1

    Why not place a world map with nuclear waste storage sites on it? Sure, continents drift, but people in million years should know about past shape of the world the same we do.

  68. Beautiful and stolen within 100 years by mlush · · Score: 1

    Sapphire and platinum, I bet it would be a unique, beautiful and cool object... so unique and beautiful that its going to get stolen.... and if its known that nuclear sites have them it will just encourage people to dig there looking for the disk.

  69. Re:Will be salvaged by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    You want it concentrated. That way you can get to it once the Chinese have build breeder reactors and need the old "waste" to fuel their reactors.
    This disk should just be a back up plan.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  70. Spanish by kikito · · Score: 1

    Por supuesto!

  71. Language is immaterial by crossmr · · Score: 1

    Barring a total collapse of the world, we're unlikely to be losing a lot of important data being created now. If there is a total collapse, we've got bigger fish to fry than some old time capsule.

    That said, a single hard drive should be able to hold dictionaries and language tools for every language going, as well as whatever message they want to put on it.

  72. No need for numbers by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    It would be good enough to have a large drawing of the full periodic table, with even the lanthanide gaps filled in instead of being aliased. No need even for atom drawings. It is the structure of the periodic table that tells you quite unambiguously what everything is. This would work for any civilisation that has reached enough chemistry to know what radioactive means.

    Label the main radionucleides clearly, then have a simple drawing of the site marked with the symbols.

    Our own pre-chemical societies often had problems just from natural hazards. There is a Roman lead mine up on the Mendips near where I live where the water is, to say the least, not potable. In the Harz mountains people suffered from the effects of nickel salts in the water, which they attributed to the work of the devil (which is why nickel is called nickel...). If civilisation collapses or if we die out and are replaced, many more creatures will die of natural hazards than will be killed by our repositories.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  73. This isn't actually stupid at all by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2

    One rather drastic option would be to put lots of warning notices at the entrance followed by a radioactive source that will initially kill anybody in a few hours. The learning curve should be fairly short.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  74. But, he concedes: 'We have no idea what language t by Slalomsk8er · · Score: 1

    I propose bones. Huge piles of bones will get our ancestors to think about what could be wrong with this place and that it is not save to enter with out a bit of caution. The storage of the bones could be a problem but if you are clever you can create a wildlife trap with integrated fossilization and all run by and hinting to the radioactive problem it self.

  75. Long Now Rosetta Disk by fritsd · · Score: 2

    The work has already been done, see the Rosetta Stone project of the Long Now foundation:
    http://rosettaproject.org/.

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  76. (offtopic) about modding by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    (...) Perhaps /. shouldn't give more mods to people who spend (or waste) all of their mod points whenever they get them and shouldn't keep giving mods to people who have a history of voting negatively.

    I fear this to be a sign of less users on /.

    For a couple of months now, I find myself endowed with mod points in an unusually frequent way.
    Up to last year I got to mod only now and then; I didn't improve my participation, or so I feel ;-)

    I'm worried if modpoints are attributed more often this may mean that le are just less numerous...

    H.

    --
    Herve S.
  77. NO documentation by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "If it was hard to write, it should be hard to read."

  78. dig it up by kiep · · Score: 1

    and send it to the sun

  79. Print the data on sheets of gold with a laser by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Print the data on sheets of gold. It can be thin. It wont degrade and you wont need a player that lives for 40,000 years.

    Digital is not the answer to everything.

    1. Re:Print the data on sheets of gold with a laser by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      a shiny, easily melted or formed metal that's always been used as money as long as there was civilization? that's silly. big ten ton blocks of granite with deeply engraved letters, not portable, not scare to be valuable.

  80. Gems? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Natural saphires are expensive gem stones.
    When the civilization collapses such a disk will easy end as lots of gems in a necklace of a queen.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  81. Make it self-documenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A civilization that can read a digital storage medium is likely to have geo-exploration techniques that can locate the dangerous stuff directly.

    A civilization that *can't* is just going to take the platinum-and-sapphire thing to whoever in their society gets to keep all the pretty stuff. I mean, epic schwag or what?

    Any readable "this is real dangerous" warning will, guaranteed, be taken by some to mean that something of great value is hidden inside. Bold adventurers (suicidal castaways, drunken wanderers) will venture in, find nothing validating the warnings, but come back to their communities contaminated, with tales of unspoilt resources of great value (even if that's only a dry space with a good roof).

    So just make it obviously as dangerous as it really is. Surround the entrances, and distribute randomly within the area, caches of material so active it will cause quick death to anyone who comes near it. *That's* a universal warning, no?

    "Hey, I think these distinctive structures, ancient pictographs and/or artificial barriers mean that it's dangerous to go any further". "Where, over here? .... oooh, not feelin' good all of a sudden ... ".

    All these schemes for warnings seem to be just a salve for the consciousnesses of people who want to pretend that burying million-year-lifetime radioactive waste can be made acceptable to our current sensibilities of low (and declining) risk tolerance.

    Either that, or it's a subversive plot by opponents who want to show that long-term storage is an insurmountable ethical problem for both power generation and weapons development.

    1. Re:Make it self-documenting by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If someone could read it. They will just think, this is just a warning from a primitive superstitious civilization, just trying to keep away grave diggers. Our test show that this was made from the period of 1000-2500

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  82. The Library of Alexandria by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    The only reason we have any archaeology is because people didn't write anything down.

    The Library of Alexandria begs to differ:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria

    "the largest and most significant[1] great library of the ancient world. It flourished under the patronage of the Ptolemaic dynasty and functioned as a major center of scholarship [...]

    Julius Caesar accidentally burned the library down when he set fire to his own ships to frustrate Achillas' attempt to limit his ability to communicate by sea."

    WHOOPS!

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  83. A familiar concern to Sci-Fi authors by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 2

    Look at today. How many different electronic book formats are there? Ten years from now, how many e-book readers will read these same formats, and how many new ones will there be? A hundred years from now, you'll have even more formats growing at that same progression rate until either a radical shift in information storage occurs, or the system becomes overloaded. Today, many people devote time and energy to maintaining these formats or helping convert them from older to newer, but the center cannot hold; eventually, information will be lost.

    Roger MacBride Allen has an interesting time travel series called The Chronicles of Solace that briefly touches on a similar issue to this; archiving historians struggle to contain the ever-growing wealth of data that humanity generates. Specifically, they attempted to copy and duplicate all written and electronic material in a readable format for use in the Grand Library, but constantly struggle with the task that the 'standard' access method changes rapidly every few years. Not only do they have to create a format for storage that can survive ever-growing changes, but it must also contain built-in equipment that can be reverse-engineered and re-used after a potential interplanetary disaster removes all human knowledge of the technology. Their current solution? Printed books. Billions of them.

  84. Prior Art by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    See the Rosetta Stone for more information.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  85. Just use stickers by Diakoneo · · Score: 1

    25,000 euros? What a waste. Just throw a couple Mr. Yuck stickers on the front door and call it a day.....

    --
    "Just as there is nothing so unreal as reality TV, there is nothing as unsocial as social media." - Alistair Dabbs
  86. Let Nature Bear the Message by hicksw · · Score: 1

    Plant a weed garden around the blocked entrance. Humans, visiting the site much later, will be warned off by the cunning, intelligent, carnivorous mutant weeds.

    Some illiterate would just steal the the pretty disk, unable to resolve the tiny markings.
    --
    So I pass that on to you. Write it down, and put it in your computer, so you can forget it.

  87. Re:Just say no Latin or Greek by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Actually, it was more supposed to be a compromise than a "classics shall prevail forever." My perspective is more that as long as Romance languages survive, Latin will be decipherable, not that future generations will necessarily come pre-equipped with perfect knowledge. In present-day terms that gives it almost twice as much surface area as English does. I strongly expect that re-discovering the ability to translate Latin will come more easily than Greek.

    Realistically I believe that the Information Age will be seen as a second classical era, only on a much larger scale. It seems almost certain that modern English is destined to be codified and preserved much like a new Koine, but until it's a dead language we can't say for certain we know exactly how it will be read—and if words like "suffer" and "protest" can still undergo dramatic twists in meaning like they have, I'd be adverse to using current speech as a standard. Latin, at least, is codified, whether it's classical, ecclesiastical, or modern scientific in form. We can say for certain what words have inverted in meaning in its descendent languages, and safe-guard against them or avoid them entirely.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  88. Sounds like the Jay-Z version of everything by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Does it come with its own bottle of Crystal?

  89. better idea. by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

    Stop burying the crap. I'm pretty sure any future human civilization (and most animals), will happily avoid a barren radioactive desert shitpile for as long as it remains so.

  90. off topic? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    so like the fact that it needs to be documented for that long doesn't raise questions anymore as to just how 'clean' this source of energy is?

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  91. Normal Hard Disk by BradPitt2012 · · Score: 1

    Well, just build them as normal hard disks.

    --
    Deleted Files by mistake but want to get them back? Files Recovery