Slashdot Mirror


FTC Whacks "Rachel From Card Holder Services"

coondoggie writes "Just two weeks after it challenged the public to come up with a better technological way to stop incessant robocalling, the Federal Trade Commission pulled the plug on five mass calling companies it said were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre-recorded calls from 'Rachel' and others from 'Cardholder Services.' 'At the FTC, Rachel from Cardholder Services is public enemy number one,' said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz at the announcement of the cases."

289 comments

  1. I know that bitch! by conureman · · Score: 5, Funny

    How she got my number is beyond me.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    1. Re:I know that bitch! by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just hope they take the company owners, strap them to chairs, and force them to watch nothings adverts/infomercials, and while they sleep force them to hear robocall recordings. Do it 24/7/365, a' la A Clockwork Orange.

      What they do with "Rachael" is not my concern. >:(

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would tying them up and forcing them to watch the 10-hour Nyan Cat video be considered cruel and unusual punishment?

    3. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, she gave my name to Heather.

      I know because Heather called me a couple hours ago.

    4. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your boyfriend Tyrone has been screwing her behind your back. She got it from him.

    5. Re:I know that bitch! by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wont happen, all of these complaints are against LLCs, which are basically shell companies.
      If you look at the complaints, many of them are single owner. This means that the LLCs have no money on purpose.
      They will just close them down and open under new names.

    6. Re:I know that bitch! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obama needs to change his campaign slogan to "GM is Alive and Rachel is Dead". He'll win in a landslide.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:I know that bitch! by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

      > This means that the LLCs have no money on purpose.
      > They will just close them down and open under new names.

      Look up "piercing the corporate veil". Not to mention that the FTC can refer the cases to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution (the FTC itself has no criminal authority).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:I know that bitch! by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      Yes, not even the Nyan Cat video deserves that kind of treatment.

    9. Re:I know that bitch! by Defenestrar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, this chick's been auto-dialing slashdot readers and she still can't get a date? That's what you call desperate!

    10. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 weeks a ?

    11. Re:I know that bitch! by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 2

      6.63 years.

    12. Re:I know that bitch! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      If only the military and the FTC were under the president....

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billy Mays gangnam style on an infinite loop.

    14. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what 24/7 means. But 24/7/365? Does that mean 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 365 weeks?

    15. Re:I know that bitch! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And yet Lloyd Blankfein still walks free. A vote for Obama continues to be a vote for plutocracy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:I know that bitch! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      A vote for Obama continues to be a vote for plutocracy.

      Yeah, we should cut out the middle-man, and elect an actual plutocrat instead!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    17. Re:I know that bitch! by green1 · · Score: 1

      The question isn't what can they do, it's what will they do? and I highly doubt they'll go any further than the company.

    18. Re:I know that bitch! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Stephanie, who doesn't know her own cell number, gave people mine instead. I got calls from her dentist, doctor, random people. I know details about her left on my voice mail that I probably shouldn't know about a stranger. I could have claimed to be her husband or boyfriend, just by hinting and following the caller's lead.

      Anyway, I have taken a good number of these calls. At least one was in a bar. I got to the part where they want my credit card number. I hesitated. A supervisor told me that my account number is actually the CC number plus the CVV on the back. He can't use the card without that, he claims, and giving just my "member number" is safe.

      I couldn't drag him on any further, so I said I just let these calls go on as long as possible so you don't bother someone else. He said he doesn't mind, he gets paid by the hour, and I could be doing something else. My answer, I'm just sitting here eating food that's bad for me and having a beer. No hot chicks to hit on, I'm just waiting till I'm sure I'm good to drive. Then he starts the insults, stereotypes based on my area code.

      I enjoyed the call, but I'm glad they are out of business.

    19. Re:I know that bitch! by antdude · · Score: 1

      What does this Rachel look like? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    20. Re:I know that bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so special about 7 years? 24/7 or 24/365 please.

      Yours pedantically......

    21. Re:I know that bitch! by sunsurfandsand · · Score: 1

      "What they do with "Rachael" is not my concern." Rachel from Cardmember Services is my sister, you insensitive clod.

    22. Re:I know that bitch! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I just hope they take the company owners, strap them to chairs, and force them to watch nothings adverts/infomercials, and while they sleep force them to hear robocall recordings. Do it 24/7/365, a' la A Clockwork Orange.

      What they do with "Rachael" is not my concern. >:(

      Not having a public number, who is Rachael, and does she date?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    23. Re:I know that bitch! by lsatenstein · · Score: 2

      A vote for Obama continues to be a vote for plutocracy.

      Yeah, we should cut out the middle-man, and elect an actual plutocrat instead!

      We Canadians are following the elections with great interest. We see you with two options.
      Another George Bush, or a second term with an intelligent leader who is, with the constraints and road blocks that congress put before him (sticks in the wheels), etc, trying hard to bring a country out of recession.
      It is so funny to read how the owner of Bain Capital sent jobs offshore and then says he will create jobs. Do you need a minimum wage position?

      In a recent survey, 21 of 22 countries believe Obama will do a substantially better job than Romney. The one dissenter was Pakistan. Canada, Australia, Latin America, (Chavez included), Mexico and the European community, China included were in the 21.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    24. Re:I know that bitch! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/podcasts/day6_20121103_38032.mp3

      This is a Canadian Broadcast that covers a lot of territory. It has some positive and negative feedback about American situations, as reported by American reporters, and former Governors.

      Its about several topics, including Romney in Mass. Voter Fraud, Hurricane Sandy, and what should be of great interest to Americans, the elections in two days from now.

      The program is similar to what you might hear on PBS

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Who's Rachel? by tgmarks · · Score: 1

    And why is public enemy number one some simple average american girl?

    1. Re:Who's Rachel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't that their daughter?

    2. Re:Who's Rachel? by jeffmeden · · Score: 0

      Isn't that their daughter?

      Congratulations, you have arrived at the crux of the dilemma of American Society. Fortunately, the thing about being a hypocrite is that you aren't expected to be consistent, and you are almost always relatable.

    3. Re:Who's Rachel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behind their backs? Heck, they drove her to the clinic - they know where it is because they're usually outside of it protesting and screeching in the faces of the people going in.

    4. Re:Who's Rachel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      After reviewing my home phone calls for about 6 months and realizing that 25/26 calls were from Card Services, I finally decided to make sure I update that one company that still had my home number on file and drop my home phone service -- along with cable tv.

      It's been 4 months now, and I haven't looked back. I owe Rachel some thanks. Without her persistent annoyance, I might have never cut those services.

    5. Re:Who's Rachel? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Isn't that their daughter?

      Lesbian daughter.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Who's Rachel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, seriously, who is she? She's obviously an actress who was paid to record the message. Did she have any idea as she cashed the check of the misery she would cause?

    7. Re:Who's Rachel? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Probably not. It was probably just a good voice acting gig to her, that help paid the bills.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Who's Rachel? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      That she later got called on.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Who's Rachel? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      No! Daddy's little girl is an angel! ANGEL!!

      (In loud, boistrous voice.)
      [Never underestimate the power of willful self-delusion. Especially in those who have already willfully jumped headfirst into that festering hole. In daddy's mind, his daughter is an innocent little angel, and the world is to blame!]

    10. Re:Who's Rachel? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      Pay the bills? She probably got paid in services. You know, they'd help initiate a 3-way call with the actual credit card companies to orally ask to lower her rates. Apparently, that is worth thousands of dollars!

    11. Re:Who's Rachel? by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Same with my cellphone. Last month about two thirds of the calls were from these idiots. It's bad enough having my time wasted, but they were also using up my limited minutes.

    12. Re:Who's Rachel? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, when I cancelled my home phone, I moved the number to a cell phone. seemed like a good idea at the time as I'd had that number as my main contact number for over 10 years. Unfortunately it also means that I get a lot of telemarketing calls to my cell phone now. of course I do report every single one of them to the CRTC (our version of the FCC)... don't know if it helps, but it doesn't seem to hurt...

    13. Re:Who's Rachel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Kinda like when that guy payed me 20 bucks to lob a Molotov cocktail at some guy's business. Perfectly legit gig, because it helped pay my bills. Who am I to judge.

    14. Re:Who's Rachel? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I'm always h hoping that, in a just universe, Rachel herself is sick and tired of receiving Rachel calls.
      Not only are they annoying, but they're annoying in her own voice.

  3. Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Simple as that. Glad to know someone was taking it seriously. And your next impossible mission, should you choose to accept it... "the chimney company."

    1. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohh, what's there scam?

      I must say, good job! I was getting these multiple times a day to my cell for a while. I started answering and saying nothing. It dropped to a couple of times a month. At any rate, lets lock these cancers on society (no offense intended to cancer) in a room and throw away the room.

    2. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about they end caller ID spoofing? I'm paying for caller ID, why should the phone company allow callers to lie to me who they are?

    3. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      How can you spoof the caller ID anyway? I mean shouldn't the telephone company know the caller ID of whoever is initiating the call (to know where to send the invoice for the call)? Is this some sort of hack using ISDN since I don't think anything like this would be possible on analog lines. Even with ISDN, shouldn't the company filter out the malformed (spoofed) requests, just like most ISPs do with packets that have spoofed source IP?

    4. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can you spoof the caller ID anyway? I mean shouldn't the telephone company know the caller ID of whoever is initiating the call (to know where to send the invoice for the call)?

      They do know, when the call originates in their network. When it passes off to another network, they only know which network it came from, and who *that network* says it is. The honour system is what keeps ATT and Verizon (and so forth) from passing deliberately bad information between each other (and the threat of pissed off customers). That's how spoofing caller ID works... when you pass off into another network, give them bad information about the identity. If the call originates from a VOIP phone, especially an international VOIP phone, then there isn't much control over what information gets passed to your local carrier. And you can't simply block all VOIP lines, because there are legitimate VOIP carriers in the market, too.

      Obligatory disclaimer: I work for a phone company, though in a different LOB.

    5. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      the telephone company know the caller ID of whoever is initiating the call They use ANI which is how 911 gets your number, which is not spoofable. So the phone company always knows who is really calling. On almost any non pots phone system it is trivial to set up caller ID any way you want.

    6. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is with leased lines (I don't recall if it's ISDN or T-1s). The problems is it's not a malformed request, the request is properly formed, it just doesn't contain properly identifying infomration. The phone company doesn't KNOW the information is fake.

      The reason for this is thus:

      I have a company with a PBX with 100 people behind it, I want to genuinely provide the name of the person at my company who is calling. My pbx passes on the information to the phone company, which intern passes it on to your phone. The phone company couldn't do this themselves, because they don't know who is assigned what extension (or even who works for me).

      I suppose they could prepend the information about who they got the information from. Then I supposed you could trace as far back as the owner of the PBX.

    7. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Scutter · · Score: 1

      Just like almost anything else in life, there are plenty of legitimate reasons for spoofing Caller-ID, but it's ruined by the people who abuse it for illegal purposes.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    8. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, the telephone company knows trunking information. Remember that, the "Recieving" customer isn't getting billed... so our phone system was never designed to care who initiated the call. All your local switch knows is that the call is coming in on Trunk XYZ from some neighboring phone company... that company got it from somewhere else... and on and on. Caller ID was introduced much later and is just basically extra data tacked onto the call. It was designed not to be all that accurate intentionally. Imagine working at a bank and calling one of your customers. You want the banks phone number to show up, not your desk phone. Now that we're in the situation that we're in, it all looks very short sighted... but remember when all these systems were designed there was no VOIP systems. In order to initiate a call you needed a phone company to do that for you, and they would need to be complicit in your fraud. But now with VOIP services everywhere, with a little bit of knowledge you can do just about anything you want.

    9. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Please, no - that will break Google Voice. And I'll lose my multiple lines of VoIP coming from the same number at home. Each line would have to have its own phone number.

    10. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe it goes something like this:

      1. charge customers for caller ID on incoming calls.
      2. charge customers for the ability to hide their ID on outgoing calls.
      3. charge customers for the ability to "see" hidden ID's on incoming calls.
      4. go to number 2. rinse and repeat.

    11. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by PPH · · Score: 4, Informative

      That only works within the local POTS network. If the call originates from a different exchange, they don't know the source number, only the exchange it came from.

      E911 services are not intended to be used across exchanges. When you call 9-1-1, you get routed to the dispatch center local to your exchange.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      If they were taking it "seriously" it wouldn't have went on for so long. I got a call on my cell phone yesterday evening from them, and was sometimes getting 3 each day on our home phone. The DNC list is useless if it's not followed up.

    13. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by mikael · · Score: 2

      Some phone companies / telco exchange suppliers offer this as a service:
      http://www.fcc.gov/guides/caller-id-and-spoofing

      Simple home method is to use a Fax Machine - by law you are supposed to have correct identification details configured onto the machine.
      My parents had their old address and number on their combo fax/machine telephone. Caller-ID would show up their old details.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      How about they end caller ID spoofing? I'm paying for caller ID, why should the phone company allow callers to lie to me who they are?

      Regrettably, most my real annoyances don't even spoof. The biggest offender of the whole lot is a local alarm company that calls 2-3 times a day 7 days a week. They're owned by an ex-cop. They put pictures of cops in their ads. They run radio commercials featuring crying burglars.

      And they're in blatant violation of 2 separate Do-Not-Call lists.

    15. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

      Guaranteed accurate but not-specific information like owner of the PBX is definitely preferable to trusting that you're not getting utterly false information.

    16. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funniest thing I saw was that Rachel from Card Services came up as "Phone Scam" once on my caller ID. As annoying as she is, I did get a laugh out of that one!

    17. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "How can you spoof the caller ID anyway?"

      Relatively easy. Yesterday I had . - yes a period - show up as the caller ID number.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    18. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Cramer · · Score: 1

      They use ANI which is how 911 gets your number, which is not spoofable.

      Oh yes it is. Buy a PRI from a phone company that lets you announce whatever number you want. The phone company is *supposed* to check what you send them, but I've never met one that will. The intended purpose is to announce a toll-free number, the pilot number, etc. instead of the trunk or line numbers.

    19. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      This is why we have government regulators.

      If the crooks had just invested a little money on phony think tanks and PR, we'd be hearing about how "over-regulation" was discouraging "job creators".

      At least one of the major "free market" political donors has a record of getting sued and prosecuted by neighbors and customers.

    20. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by firewrought · · Score: 1

      How can you spoof the caller ID anyway?

      The land line you get from the teleco for your home can't be spoofed, but businesses usually get PRI service to hookup their own PBX to the phone company. Whoever runs that PBX can send whatever caller ID info they want (typically). This is useful when you want to include each employee's name in their outgoing caller ID, or if you have multiple firms using the same PBX. So it's not so much an ISDN hack as it is an ISDN feature.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    21. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, for a while I was entertaining switching over to VOIP and I found I could set my caller ID to whatever I wanted to. Policy was that I was supposed to set it to something appropriate, but the carrier had no way to know whether I was complying. It is very common for outgoing calls to go through a different carrier than incoming calls anyway - so even the carrier wouldn't know my phone number. Plus if it is going into some kind of PBX they have to take your word for it anyway.

      If you call an 800 number they get ANI info which you can't spoof. However, again if it is VOIP there is no guarantee that they could reach you back on that same number.

    22. Re:Congratulations, FTC, and thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm. The bank uses a PBX internally so the bank's number would show and your desk number would not show anyway.

  4. Explains why she never called me back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Met her at a bar the other night. Don't completely remember her name, but it was something like Rachel FromCardHolderServices, yeah something like that...

    1. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you buy her lots of drinks and leave with nothing? Yeah. that was me.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    2. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with beer goggles in full effect, you still look like a dude.

    3. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      That's not what he said...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    4. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he was cool with the fact that you're a dude?

    5. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you leave slashdot you trolling cunt?

    6. Re:Explains why she never called me back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fat ugly cunt is why!

  5. Halleluja! by chill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been receiving no less than 3 calls a week for the last 6 months from "Card Services" with this robocall. The numbers were always different, so blocking didn't help.

    Often the calls came in as late as 9:00 p.m., which was seriously annoying.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been receiving no less than 3 calls a week for the last 6 months from "Card Services" with this robocall. The numbers were always different, so blocking didn't help.

      Often the calls came in as late as 9:00 p.m., which was seriously annoying.

      Might be a little early to celebrate. I just got a call from them at 10:41AM (EDT) this morning.

    2. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a reason the numbers are always different.

      Not many know that caller ID is in no way reliable or secure. If you have a PRI/BRI/digital phone circut/whatever (Pretty much anything but an analog POTS line) you can specify the calling party number however you like. It doesn't even need to be a valid phone number! (It's fun to call your friends with the caller ID number of '666' and speak in a creepy voice)

      Legitimately, this is so you can treat your physical lines as an aggregate pool in a phone system so your user can have the correct caller ID from any outgoing line in the pool.

      Technically, however, it's illegal to spoof your caller ID for the purposes of evading identification. The caller ID number should resolve to something you can call back on. Either that, or it should report as caller ID blocked. (You can request that the phone company block all caller-id blocked calls.)

      Nowadays, the law (correctly, imo) pretty much makes running profitable robocall operations illegal. Since for-profit robocallers are now fly by night illegal operations anyway, they flaunt the caller ID spoofing laws.

    3. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Six months? I've received those calls for something like 6 years. There is nothing that will make them stop calling 3 times a week. The FTC has fuck this one up big time. 200,000 complaints a month for four years and they've finally shut a few companies down. WTF? People should be going to jail by now. Find the call rooms and punish everyone for fraud.

      Don't try talking to the operators of these calls. They're abusive or they just hang up fast. I once tried to play along, but they told me I wasn't eligible, so they called me again two days later.

    4. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not so fast with the joy of victory there Bubba Chill, I received one of these calls about half an hour ago. Plus TFA says that the FTC filed complaints in court - not that the companies were shut down. So as always, the summary may have embellished the truth a bit in order to make the front page.

      Also, remember what's happening next week? It's an election. One major party (R) and one notable second string party (L) have vowed to reduce federal bureaucracy to that American business will be free to go about the business of American business without interference from burdensome government regulations and oversight. Can you image reducing government regulation and bureaucracy by eliminating the FTC trying to enforce the do not call list? I know, that's an extremely unpopular (and troll-worthy) example of where deregulation could take us but it is an example of how reducing government regulation of business can lead to undesirable (for most consumers) business practices.

    5. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3 a week, consider yourself lucky. I get so many that I had to invest in a home phone that I could assign sound files to numbers and just leave numbers not in my call directory as an empty sound file.

      I've tried all sort of things using an old computer running Linux to filter calls. At one point had the computer pick up the call, feed the input through a dictation program to figure out what was said int he first few seconds of the call searching for the almost always used phrases to call some odd number and then dropping the call or putting it through depending upon the results. Sadly it annoyed legitimate callers so much that I just couldn't use the system for very long. Another point I moved on to documentation for robocall systems I could find info online about, with the goal of gaining control over them to shut them down. Despite having so many vectors of attack from those documents, I only got any of it to work on a couple systems, even then I wasn't able to gain any notable access to the configuration because it just wasn't exposed to the phone side of the system, at best I could tie them up with enough commands to keep them busy for awhile.

    6. Re:Halleluja! by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      The only call I've ever received other than Card Services on our new Comcast landline has been the collectors because of tweakers that got a pay-day loan on an out-of-date check they found whilst looting my place. No one but Rachel and Comcast know that number.
      Won't someone think of the poor telemarketers? I presume if I didn't hang up then some zombie would've then tried to engage me in conversation.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    7. Re:Halleluja! by dark12222000 · · Score: 1

      I had similar problems. I finally talked to someone and had a several hour screaming match filled with legal threats and personal insults, after which the calls stopped for me.

    8. Re:Halleluja! by omnichad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well that sounds unnecessarily complex. I have this setup at home via Asterisk: 1) Call comes in 2) Prompt whether they are calling for me (press 1) or my wife (press 2). 3) Caller ID on phones show who the call is for and I don't have to answer my wife's calls. And we get ZERO robo calls. Those calls get hung up on after 3 repeats of the prompt and no button press.

      Really, the robocall blocking was just a bonus. This is how we survived when I was working from home and routed all calls to all phones in the apartment.

    9. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      (It's fun to call your friends with the caller ID number of '666' and speak in a creepy voice)

      But first, get some sulfur hexaflouride.
      It sounds amazing.

    10. Re:Halleluja! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't try talking to the operators of these calls. They're abusive or they just hang up fast. I once tried to play along, but they told me I wasn't eligible, so they called me again two days later.

      If you're not busy, you can get some entertainment out of stringing them along for as long as you can. Not only does it totally piss them off when they find out that you're screwing with them, but every minute that they spend talking to you is a minute less that they have to potentially make money from scamming someone else.

      If everyone who got these calls would just answer and talk to them for a single minute without giving them any usable information, it would become so unprofitable that they would have to shut down.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    11. Re:Halleluja! by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I have been receiving no less than 3 calls a week for the last 6 months from "Card Services" with this robocall. The numbers were always different, so blocking didn't help.

      Often the calls came in as late as 9:00 p.m., which was seriously annoying.

      I've been lucky, not only is my cell phone number clean, my google voice number is also. clean meaning I don't get calls for previous owners of the numbers, nor do I get robo calls, or anything like that. but my last 3 cellphone numbers have been dirty. I haven't had a land line in 20 years or so. I could get one, for cheap even, but see no need.

      Best part is, when I had dirty cell phones, I'd set google voice up to show my google voice number when i get calls, so if I see any other calls, I just let it go voicemail (which I never checked).

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:Halleluja! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      From the demented lab of Lord Apathy..

      I'm just going to toss this out there and let you geeks run with this. I think the technology is there to do this, just a matter of bringing it all together.

      We have pretty good voice recognition technology. Sure when I ask my smart phone where I can get a pizza it still thinks I'm asking for directions to a whore house. I'm not sure if its getting voice confused or it might be smarter than I though. Any way, the technology is pretty good.

      An on the other side with also have pretty good voice synthesis too. A little tweaking an some of it can almost pass for human. Well it will be close enough to get this job done.

      AI software is pretty advanced too. Not advanced as we'd like it to be but advanced enough that it can fool a fairly intelligent person into thinking that they are talking to another person for 15 or 20 minutes at a time. Think how long it could fool one of these low grade morons that work in these call centers.

      Bring all three of these technologies together in a program that will answer the phone and engage these telemarketers in a Eliza like maze. If they can tie up these people just for a few minutes before they are talking to a machine it would cost the telemarketers thousands of dollars. Think what a a few thousand of set ups like this in place could do?

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    13. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. In most European telcos the Calling Party ID is screened by the network. Some networks use the option (as described in ETS 300 092-1 paragraph 9.4 and Annex B) to allow both screened and unscreened Calling Party ID to be propagated. Indeed the receiver of the call gets two IEs, one marked unscreened and one screened.

      I have been told that direct SS7 attachment is used in the US. I guess that would make spoofing a lot easier.

    14. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do exactly that for exactly that reason. These companies have a business model that works. As long as it works, they will use it. Government has proven ineffective in ending that model. So, we, the people, need to disrupt their model. Keep them on the phone for no sale.

      Of course, G-d only knows what replacement model they will introduce.

    15. Re:Halleluja! by patmandu · · Score: 1

      Yep, I got a call from Card Services this morning. I'm glad they made some headway, but...I suspect other players will come in to fill the void.

    16. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant plan!

      We could also write a robo-call-receiver-robot app that would chat with them for us

    17. Re:Halleluja! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *flout

    18. Re:Halleluja! by hicksw · · Score: 1

      they flout the caller ID spoofing laws.

      FTFY
      --
      If you're a paranoid nerd, I am watching you. You're boring.

  6. YES! Kill the sluts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rachel has been calling me for years and the ho needed to be taken down. Nothing works to stop the bitch. Screaming into the phone, swearing at them, putting the phone down and not talking, pretending to be a mindless fool who can't find their cards and keeping them on the line for long periods of time. This outfit is just so lame. I had recently recorded the tones that are played when the call was transferred by pressing "1" so I could dial them directly and start bothering them.

  7. My new top issue in the 2012 election by tfocker4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is giving whoever took care of this one billion dollars.

    1. Re:My new top issue in the 2012 election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banning paid political broadcast ads, and requiring stations to choose how much of their public affairs programming time they offer in a balanced manner for FREE, would do much to help with the problem, and the extreme undue influence bought by huge contributions currently seen from outside the areas broadcasters are licensed to serve.

      The top 9 contributors supporting a well known major candidate for national office are all banks!
      So much for cracking down on investment schemes and tax policies that harm society.
      Banning paid radio/tv/cable ads would not be discriminatory since it would apply to individuals as well as corporations.

  8. foghorn? by Speare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope the pre-recorded foghorn caller is included. I think it's offering some travel package, but since the first thing you hear is a loud lighthouse foghorn sound, I haven't listened to the pitch for the last several years. They've been attacking my office line about 3 times a year for the past decade, from different caller ID numbers.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:foghorn? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      I am pretty sure you are supposed to think that sound is a cruise ship horn. I was getting that on my company issued cellphone for awhile, although I have not gotten it for about a month now.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:foghorn? by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      I get that one on my cell phone sometimes. So annoying.

    3. Re:foghorn? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      I've gotten those. After the foghorn someone says "This is your Captain speaking" so I assume it probably is indeed a cruise ship package of some sort. I didn't get any further than the first voice clip before hanging up.

    4. Re:foghorn? by happylight · · Score: 1

      I got that on my cell phone just this morning.

    5. Re:foghorn? by Antipater · · Score: 1

      That one, at least, is not done with yet. I got a "*foghorn*This is your captain speaking. You've won a trip to the Bahamas!" call just this morning.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    6. Re:foghorn? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      My wife gets this daily, somewhere between 3:30pm and 4pm ... "Unknown Caller" all the time, same bullshit recorded message.

      As I said when the article about how to stop this ... stop allowing companies to spoof caller ids. The marketers will scream bloody murder, but if you need to put in false information of any sort, that's bordering on fraud.

      I'd like to set my phone to say "don't receive calls from anything with a fake caller id, or a blocked caller id".

      I've pretty much reached the point that my starting position is hostile to any phone call with an area code I don't recognize, any 800/888/877 number, and anything with Blocked/Unknown caller id.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:foghorn? by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      I got that a few times on my company cell. Usually about once every couple of months.

      If I had the time and inclination, I'd patch through the line, then claim that I'd have to send them a check to pay for it. They give me the address, then I'd try to do unto them what Slashdot once did to that fuckhead Ralsky. The USPS could use the boost anyway.

      (Speaking of which, I wonder if Ralsky still gets mail... *snicker*)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    8. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. It's nice that they signal me to hang up right away.

    9. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone researched the source of that one, check it out:
      https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Foghorn-Telephone-Call-Again-today?pid=2911815#pid2911815

      I get those calls on my cell phone too, a few times a year.

    10. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hope the person who operates that gets cancer and their entire family dies in a house fire.

    11. Re:foghorn? by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Oh god, I just posted about that one! Use those guys for shark food.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    12. Re:foghorn? by berashith · · Score: 1

      I havent listened to that pitch ever. If I meet someone that has lasted past the first annoying blast I will hurt them. This piece of crap call should garner exactly ZERO sales, as it is instantly annoying, and everyone should know to just hang up.

    13. Re:foghorn? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I hacked a quick script together to invoke 'mrnumber' (.com) or equiv service when my modem (yes, real modem on real landline) says the callerid (network CID, actually, so I just connect to a tcp port to get broadcasts of the CID).

      the mrnumber crowdsourced website seems to have decent enough go/noGo score so that I can just let the phone ring (let them think there's nothing connected, no person or machine there) or I can answer it if I want.

      its getting to be like email, where you want whitelists and anything not in that list gets a 2nd thought if you even want to let them pass-thru to the voicemail/ans mach.

      I have no solution for cellphones, but I'm not a big cellphone user anyway, so that solves that, for me. landline abuse is not technically hard to solve if you simply let them 'age you out' due to the line never ever being answered when they call. and if they don't give up, well, you still never get bothered. (my scheme will eventually have a hardware relay that passes thru the 2 phone wires or not, so that your phone chain, below, won't even ring or bother you).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped answering the phone a good 10 years ago and usually let it go straight to voicemail unless I'm near the phone and it's a number I recognize. This solves 99%+++ of the annoyances. If I miss an 'important' call, oh well. That's why voicemail exists. And if it's 'important' and message was not left? Well then, it clearly wasn't 'important' enough for an immediate response.

    15. Re:foghorn? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I've heard beyond the horn, but only because I was too stunned by disbelief to hang up.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:foghorn? by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Same. This morning, and anywhere from 2-10 times per week for the past couple years.

      --
      put the what in the where?
    17. Re:foghorn? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Oh yes! I remember being apart of that. Ahhh, the memories.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    18. Re:foghorn? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Got one yesterday. Fuckers piss me off.

    19. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work calls on my cell, and this is the only number I use for important stuff. I have caller ID on my VoIP phones, anything with no caller ID I let go through to voicemail. The Voicemail gets emailed to me, so i can check it on my cell quickly. I also don't answer the phones at meal times with the family, or when putting the kids to bed, reading stories etc. They know this is their time unless I am on-call, and anyone who knows my home number knows this too 8).

    20. Re:foghorn? by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      If I had the time and inclination, I'd patch through the line, then claim that I'd have to send them a check to pay for it. They give me the address, then I'd try to do unto them what Slashdot once did to that fuckhead Ralsky. The USPS could use the boost anyway.

      (Speaking of which, I wonder if Ralsky still gets mail... *snicker*)

      According to Wikipedia, Ralsky got out about 7 weeks ago. I wonder where he's living now? ;)

    21. Re:foghorn? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, Ralsky got out about 7 weeks ago. I wonder where he's living now? ;)

      If he knows what's good for his mailbox, he'll be living a very quiet life and working a quiet but respectable job.

      There are far too many sysadmins out here who have very long memories...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    22. Re:foghorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no solution for cellphones, but I'm not a big cellphone user anyway, so that solves that, for me.

      For everyone else, smartphone apps apparently control SMS and calls pretty well, even preventing your abuser from reaching your voicemail.

  9. Don't scapegoat Rachel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about instead of a fictional character, they go after the real people and companies that profitted from the scam? You know, the credit-card companies and the thieves. Perhaps a big fine and some jail time might solve the problem.

  10. What will happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far, FTC has filed suits. The suits will be settled, where the people running these companies will pay a fine of part of their profits and a promise to never do it again. They'll go right back to robocalling, maybe under the same company or under a new company name. Nothing changes when all said and done. Nice and profitable, if you have no soul.

  11. sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like the title of some bad porno.

    ill leave the meaning of "FTC" in this case up for debate.

  12. Please pierce the corporate veil by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now, assuming we bust all 5 companies and take everything they have, is there any way to go after the owners personally for the frauds they've committed? Or is this going to be yet another instance of the all-too-common business plan:
    1. Set up a scam company.
    2. Scam people.
    3. Government busts the company, forces it into bankruptcy.
    4. Personally, you avoided punishment because it's limited liability.
    5. Profit!
    6. Repeat as many times as you like.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually one of the reasons the corporate veil can be pierced is that it is just being used as a front for illegal behavior. If you have over a certain number it's actually worse because you are subject to additional charged under RICO.

    2. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Informative

      Limited liability only protects you from torts (some private person suing you personally for something your company does.) It doesn't shield you from criminal liability. If your company breaks the law, you are personally responsible, if it was your decision. This is why Bernie Madoff is in jail - his company was defrauding it's investors, but it was his decision to do so.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    3. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should have all the people involved drafted into the Army to defuse landmines. Once one year of service is completed they can leave but if they are involved anything like this again it becomes their permanent career.

    4. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Informative

      Take a look at the 5 cases, they are linked to in the article. I like this one:

      Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff v. ELH Consulting, LLC, also d/b/a Proactive Planning Solutions; Purchase Power Solutions, LLC; Allied Corporate Connection, LLC; Complete Financial Strategies, LLC; 3Point14 Consulting, LLC, also d/b/a Elite Planning Group; Key Tech Software Solutions, LLC, also d/b/a Key One Solutions; Emory L. Holley IV a/k/a Jack Holley, individually and as the sole member of ELH Consulting, LLC; Lisa Miller, individually and as the sole member of Allied Corporate Connection, LLC, Complete Financial Strategies, LLC, and Purchase Power Solutions, LLC; Rares Stelea, individually and as the sole member of 3Point14 Consulting, LLC; and Justin Journay, individually and as the sole member of Key Tech Software Solutions, LLC, Defendants.

      Over the 5 cases, in addition to the various corporate entities they name 12 individuals.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraud abhors a vacuum.

      Bankrupt the companies, and the people behind them will set up new ones with different names. Prosecute the owners, and new people will step in to set up new companies. As long as the system allows caller ID spoofing and phone calls by robots, this will continue because the opportunity is there. Take away the opportunity and this will stop.

      The caller should have two, and only two, options for displaying their info on caller ID: either they choose to allow their accurate info to be shown or to have it blocked. That way they may choose to be anonymous, but we may also choose to have our phones ignore anonymous callers.

      Computers should be banned from placing voice calls. I bought a tailored suit two years ago, and the company needed my phone number to let me know when it was ready. Every two months since then they've robocalled me. I bought a car last year and every three months I get a robocall from the dealership trying to sell me an oil change or another car. Why? Because they think the call doesn't cost them anything -- they don't realize it cost them my business. At least three times a week we get a robocall from some creditor for an employee who hasn't worked there in 6 years, and the system refuses to connect you to a human unless you give it the SSN of the person it's trying to reach... which of course we won't do. If it's not worth a human being's time to make the call, it's not worth a human being's time to take the call. Period.

    6. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Bernie Madoff is a chump. The pros are too big to punish.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by sribe · · Score: 1

      4. Personally, you avoided punishment because it's limited liability.

      There is no limited liability for running a criminal enterprise. Limited liability only applies to owners of companies engaged in legal activities.

    8. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Genda · · Score: 1

      So I wonder what the prison term is for 2,000,000,000 acts of fraud, illegal phone use and misrepresentation? Please let the sentences be served consecutively!

    9. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming of course that the owners are the ones pulling the strings, but all too often they hire an expendable underling and tell them "do what you must do, I don't want to know what it is just make me money"

    10. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by cawpin · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can absolutely get the owners/backers.

      I actually still get automated updates from the Federal Crime Victim Notification System because I reported similar activity several years ago. 3 of the people charged ended up going to federal prison, one for something like 17 years.

    11. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the 5 cases, they are linked to in the article. I like this one:

      Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff v. ELH Consulting, LLC, also d/b/a Proactive Planning Solutions; Purchase Power Solutions, LLC; Allied Corporate Connection, LLC; Complete Financial Strategies, LLC; 3Point14 Consulting, LLC, also d/b/a Elite Planning Group; Key Tech Software Solutions, LLC, also d/b/a Key One Solutions; Emory L. Holley IV a/k/a Jack Holley, individually and as the sole member of ELH Consulting, LLC; Lisa Miller, individually and as the sole member of Allied Corporate Connection, LLC, Complete Financial Strategies, LLC, and Purchase Power Solutions, LLC; Rares Stelea, individually and as the sole member of 3Point14 Consulting, LLC; and Justin Journay, individually and as the sole member of Key Tech Software Solutions, LLC, Defendants.

      Over the 5 cases, in addition to the various corporate entities they name 12 individuals.

      /. 's not your personal army.
      But kudos to any concerned citizens out there that opt to give any or all these people the vicious interminable screwing that karma requires.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    12. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fine wont be anywhere near as big as the one for downloading 5 songs.

    13. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      /. 's not your personal army.

      I don't know what that is in reference to, the reason I "like" that case is because it lists the most defendants.

      But kudos to any concerned citizens out there that opt to give any or all these people the vicious interminable screwing that karma requires.

      That's what we have the court system for. The government will freeze their assets and take whatever they have more effectively than you or I, or whatever vigilante you're trying to encourage.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    14. Re:Please pierce the corporate veil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a fun read, take a look at the Preliminary Injunction on the FTC website for just one of these scumbags.
      http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/1223190/121101treasuresuccesstro.pdf

  13. Hm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks FTC for doing your job I guess.

    Not too sure why we're making a huge deal out of this, what I want to know is what took you so damn long.

  14. But Why FTC??? by solardiesel · · Score: 5, Funny

    She is the only girl that has called me in the last 3 years...

    Forever Alone...

    1. Re:But Why FTC??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Parents Mom never calls him - she just shouts down the basement stairs.

    2. Re:But Why FTC??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a comedian! You'd fit right in with the audience of "America's Funniest Home Videos".

    3. Re:But Why FTC??? by jkflying · · Score: 2

      WHO'S THERE? ARE YOU A SEX CRIMINAL?
      .
      .
      .
      .
      damn /. and it's stupid caps lock filters... is this enough lower case yet? what if we want to yell?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
  15. Outstanding!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic!!
    Incredibly good news!!

    Now my phone should finally quiet down after the elections and I can stop spending all my time on the DNC web site filling out complaints.

    1. Re:Outstanding!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trooo dat. I haven't received one single solitary call from the lieing fuck Republicans. Probably because they think I'm in the 47%.

    2. Re:Outstanding!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it's because your spelling skills are truly horrifying.

  16. But when, and how, did they "pull the plog"? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No information on when they did this, but I got a call from the outfit just two days ago, so they were still operational on Tuesday.

    Or, is this like so many other things done at the administrative level nowadays? "We shut them down, by sending a strongly worded letter to the post office box listed somewhere!"

    1. Re:But when, and how, did they "pull the plog"? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Informative

      All 5 cases are linked in the article. As to "when", the cases are dated today, the 1st. As to "how", the cases include things like temporary restraining orders, permanent injunctions, and asset freezes that the FTC is requesting from the court.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:But when, and how, did they "pull the plog"? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Since I can't get you above +5, a personal thank you for reading, understanding, and providing concise information.

      Requesting injunctions, granting them, and having them be followed, are separate things on a separate timetable.

      The complaints were filed "today", I saw nothing further. coondoggie is a bit premature on the whole "pulling the plug" thing. timothy should have caught that, but this being slashdot, we just trust whatever random-ass submitters post.

      I assume they could keep doing business as long as they want to, until ordered otherwise.

  17. Stop the people, not just their companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any evidence that the people responsible for doing this can be stopped, not just the companies they started? So often, the companies are shut down, only to have their founders start a copycat company doing the same thing immediately afterwards.

  18. the best thing to do by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

    "Mr. Morden: What do YOU want?
    Ambassador Vir Cotto: I'd like to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price. I want to look up into your lifeless eyes and wave like this.
    [waves]
    Ambassador Vir Cotto: Can you and your associates arrange that for me, Mr. Morden? "

    the guys running these Call Centers can be Mr Morden.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:the best thing to do by Antipater · · Score: 1
      Really? Because Morden got some pretty badass payback in the end. I'm not sure I want all FTC personnel to wake up tomorrow wearing Keepers.

      (I do love that quote though. And that wave.)

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:the best thing to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:the best thing to do by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Mr. Morden what beheaded as a gift from Ambassador Londo Molari to Vir Cotto (his assistant). So Mr. Morden did not end up wearing one of the Keepers. It was Molari who got to wear the keeper when he became emperor. It was my assumption that when G'kar kill Molari and Vir became emperor that he did not receive a Keeper but that that was never entirely clear to me.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:the best thing to do by Minwee · · Score: 1

      But you missed the punchline. Two years later, he gets to do the wave.

    5. Re:the best thing to do by Genda · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the pixieish smile with the finger wave... it made the scene. Especially later when he actually does it with Morden's head on a pike... poetic justice doesn't come often, but when it does, is there anything sweeter?

      I was driving home from Arizona, on the 10, just outside Palm Springs on a Sunday afternoon. A gold Cadillac came flying around me going over 90 mph, almost taking my front end off, then proceeds to weave through traffic like an escapee from Mad Max. I turn to my passenger and say "Where's a cop when you need one?..." when lo and behold... there's a cop. We roll down the window and yell "Crazy fsck in a gold caddy up ahead..." and the cop takes off like a bat outta hell. About 5 minutes later, we drive by the cop and the caddy, the cop waves at us as he's writing a 50 lb ticket for that rude asshole. Like I said "Does it get any sweeter?

    6. Re:the best thing to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're going to need a whole forest of pikes.

    7. Re:the best thing to do by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Mr. Morden what beheaded as a gift from Ambassador Londo Molari to Vir Cotto (his assistant). So Mr. Morden did not end up wearing one of the Keepers. It was Molari who got to wear the keeper when he became emperor. It was my assumption that when G'kar kill Molari and Vir became emperor that he did not receive a Keeper but that that was never entirely clear to me.

      Remember that the Keepers came from the Drakh once the Shadows were gone.
      The book trilogy "Legions of Fire" covers this. Londo got drunk to put the Keeper to sleep then asked G'Kar to kill him. Just as G'Kar was about to, the keeper woke up and took over and forced Molari to defend himself. Thus the two friends die together. During this is Vir leading the revolution to throw the Drakh off of Centauri Prime. (This is why he becomes Emperor, not because he happened to be there when Londo was killed.)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:the best thing to do by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      As I haven't read any of the books therefor some of the details were never filled in such as why/how Vir became the emperor.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  19. Yes! by Anon-Admin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am so fed up of these calls as well as the collection companies trying to collect on debts from 20 years ago.

    I did find a way to get them to pull you from the list.

    1) Set up asterisks phone system.
    2) Record the three tone sound and message that is played when you call a number than no longer exists.
    3) Set the message played to a blocked caller in asterisks to be the recording of the tones with the message that the number no longer exists.
    4) Blacklist every one of those F***ERS

    When the system detects the tone it will remove your number from the list, Even if they have someone check the number it will play the "Has been disconnected or is no longer in service" message.

    It cut my calls down to maybe one a month getting through and I just hit *32 after they get through and add the new number to the black list.

    1. Re:Yes! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have something similar with Google Voice. We moved our landline to it ($20 one time fee and another $20 one time fee to keep our old Google Voice number) and have it redirect calls to our cell phones. With Google Voice, you can mark a number as "spam" which means that, if they call again, they'll get a "This number is no longer in service" message.

      We've have a series of calls that wind up showing up in Google Voice but not ringing our phones. We were puzzled until we realized that there were probably robocalls from either scammers or politicians. (Cue joke about them being one and the same.) Other people probably marked them as spam so Google decided to mark all instances of calls from those numbers as spam. We can see the number that calls, but we don't get bothered with the actual call.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Yes! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The black list can grow pretty large. Why not make a white list of people who can get through instead and just log the rest?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Yes! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      The black list can grow pretty large. Why not make a white list of people who can get through instead and just log the rest?

      ...

      ( X) Whitelists suck

      ...

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:Yes! by ipxodi · · Score: 2

      The made a land-line phone that did the same thing automatically. The Telezapper. You put one on your line and when you or your answering machine picked up, the Telezapper would play those tones (SIT Tones) before your message played. I had one and it worked well. Sadly, today's call center software is wily and has figured out that particular exploit.

      Now I just don't pick up calls from number I don't recognize. If it's valid and important, they'll leave a message.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    5. Re:Yes! by jittles · · Score: 2

      Probably so its not a hassle to friends and family, if they change numbers. Not to mention if you find a new friend, or go to a new doctor's office. I know my doctor calls from a completely separate number than the one that you call when you need an appointment.

    6. Re:Yes! by houghi · · Score: 2

      Although this is a nice workaround, apparently something better exists in Europe, or at least Belgium. The ONLY annoying calls I get are from companies I have a working relationship with AND where I left my number.

      That means about 4 or 5 calls a year if that much.

      I also never heard anything about friends that are being harassed, unless from companies they have done business with.

      I have added myself to http://www.robinsonlist.be/ so I do not get any unwanted mail from companies that do not know me. I urge everybody to do the same if you live in Belgium.

      So again, nice workaround, but a permanent solution is possible and would benefit everybody, including those who do not have Asterisks.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Yes! by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I am so fed up of these calls as well as the collection companies trying to collect on debts from 20 years ago.

      If your debt is past the statute of limitations (after 20 years I can guarantee it is) then you can file suit against the collector under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (you can get a $1000 judgement per debt for the cost of the filing fee... pretty good ROI) Debt collectors are pure scum and most of them are borderline criminal organizations. I give them as much respect as I give pedophiles.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    8. Re:Yes! by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

      I need more info on this!

      Ill sue them if I can, Hell I sent out cease and desist letters and they just sold it off to another company.

    9. Re:Yes! by pwizard2 · · Score: 2

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre18.shtm

      IANAL, but here is what I know:

      Technically, you can sue them for any violation of the FDCPA. You file suit in your local jurisdiction. When they don't show up for the hearing (they almost never do, especially if the collector is out-of-state) you get a default judgement. Even if the debt is valid, an out of state collector can't do shit to you unless they are actually licensed to do business in your state. (they must display proof of license and license number when asked... if they don't have it they will back off and sell your debt to someone else) If they threaten you just send a C&D that thoroughly denies the debt and tells them that if they ever contact you without displaying proof of license you will report them to your state attorney general's office.

      If a debt collector actually sues you for a debt that is not past the statute of limitations, don't sweat it. Just file a sworn denial on account at the jurisdiction that is handling your case. The sworn denial forces the collector to prove a debt is yours... they are counting on people getting scared and doing nothing so they can get an easy default judgement. Fortunately for you, their whole case depends on them having the original signed contract, if they don't have it then they are FUCKED and you can easily win the case by requesting dismissal.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    10. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah good luck getting that money... You could hand the collection of it over to a... hmm...

    11. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is called proper rules and law enforcement. All calls have a carrier. If too many offensive calls come from a carrier then you fine the carrier. Poof! All these calls instantly disappear as the carriers suddenly find the ability to stop them. No chasing of false front corps. No ridiculous posturing of helplessness. No profit for serving the abusive callers. Just fines if you serve these parasites.

  20. I just got this call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

    1. Re:I just got this call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An outdated, unfunny internet meme.

  21. she owes billions in Do Not Call fines by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At least a $100K for my number alone at $1500 a pop.

    1. Re:she owes billions in Do Not Call fines by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I believe that court judgments cannot be discharged through bankruptcy so it might be worth perusing. Did you ever file the correct paperwork?

      --
      Time to offend someone
  22. nothing wrong with your credit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I hear that it's RachelI, I just punch 1, wait for the live operator, tell her I got something on the stove and I'll be back in a minute. That minute never comes.

  23. Please please ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Tell me someone was 'whacked' in the mafia sense of the word? Otherwise it's just a temporary shut down which will be back soon.

    Because I get a tremendous amount of calls from these automated things claiming they can lower my interest rates.

    This one is most common of these scam calls after the free cruise my wife wins every day at 3pm on her cell phone, and the morons who claim to be from "The Windows Service Provider".

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Please please ... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but even if someone was truly "whacked", it's only temporary. "Rachel" will be replaced by "Sally", and the scam will continue.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Please please ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the asshats who own the business should be fair game for a little old school hanging or something.

      You know, hang the cadavers in cages at the mouth of the harbor with a sign that says "Pirates, Ye be warned" or something.

      Unfortunately, the rules which the so-called "legitimate" telemarketers insisted be in place for the do-not call mostly just serve to shield the fraudulent ones.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Please please ... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Hanging is by far too kind. You need to go midieval on their asses. I would suggest any of the following:
      Drawn and Quartered
      Breaking_wheel
      Flaying
      Disembowelment
      Boiling
      Crucifixion
      Falling

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Please please ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Let furries rape them.

      I think they'll be begging for death after that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  24. The downside of google voice by StormyWeather · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have noticed most of these calls come disguised via google voice numbers. They change their numbers nonstop, and the majority of the time when you press one to talk to an operator the system is overloaded and just hangs up on you. I knew they were making crazy money when I saw that. If they can't even handle the amount of traffic the robodialer is generating for them, they are obviously being very successful.

    1. Re:The downside of google voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you know they are Google numbers? I thought that the scammers had some way to spoof the caller id.

      I heard that some guy named Mutt or Matt Romley (or something like that) invested millions in a company that hired thousands of jobs to make the calls in order to help get the US economy running again.

      Have you heard about that?

    2. Re:The downside of google voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google de-facto assisting with doing evil? Duh.

    3. Re:The downside of google voice by mbunch5 · · Score: 2

      If they can't even handle the amount of traffic the robodialer is generating for them, they are obviously being very successful.

      I don't think it works like that. Instead, the system is set up to dial far more numbers than they have humans to actually talk to people. The idea is that it keeps their employees constantly busy. It's worth the dropped calls to minimize employee downtime (and thus employee numbers and thus expenses), since after all the robodialer will just call you again later if it misses you this time.

    4. Re:The downside of google voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on the upside - google voice's new voice call spam filtering features have totally eliminated what used to be a 8-12 calls per week problem.

    5. Re:The downside of google voice by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I have noticed most of these calls come disguised via google voice numbers. They change their numbers nonstop, and the majority of the time when you press one to talk to an operator the system is overloaded and just hangs up on you. I knew they were making crazy money when I saw that. If they can't even handle the amount of traffic the robodialer is generating for them, they are obviously being very successful.

      Sounds like your trolling, because google voice doesn't have special numbers, it has numbers it's able to buy up from whomever is in charge of those.

      Unless your saying that the called ID say's it's Google Voice or something, then it's probably a spoof ID. If they were using google's system to do robocalls, google could pick up on that very easy and shut it down.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:The downside of google voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spa filter tech required. If identity not verified, or not on your address list, call is rejected. If they call back inside a limited period, allow though, end of call, offer to add to whitelist.

    7. Re:The downside of google voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe....or maybe a whole lot of people are just trying to tell a live person to F--- off...

    8. Re:The downside of google voice by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      no I get a lot of calls even now wanting me to sign up for my free Google 411 listing and he calls all have the area codes that Google voice uses by default if you don't choose a number in California. Your absolutely right that I may be making an incorrect assumption, but how would you make an auto dialer system. would you buy a ton of land lines or would you just use a cheap obi box and Google voice so it is harder to track you down? I would never blame Google for this but I think they may be being abused here.

  25. It's a start by Telecommando · · Score: 1

    But I'm disappointed they wouldn't implement my suggestion: to make all robo-calls add an option to their menu.

    Here's how it would work:

    "This is Rachel from Cardholder Services. There is no problem with your account.
    Please press "1" to protect your account,
    Press "2" to hear about our other exciting offers,
    Press "9" to have 10,000 volts applied to the owner of this company's genitals."

    9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ...

    I suppose they were right to reject my suggestion, though. The country couldn't afford to repeatedly replace all the "9" buttons on everyone's phones. /only half-joking

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:It's a start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This robocall was already illegal...they're not really into following regulations.

  26. Their customer service was unhelpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would occasionally allow myself to be passed to a live person, and they were never willing to help out with Diner's Club cards.

  27. No. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2

    I'd call it a good start. Let them catch their breath, think their ordeal is over... then give them 10 hours of They're Taking The Hobbits To Isengard.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:No. by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Only one time through? Your prosecutor sucks.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Followed by Rebecca Forstadt singing Stage Fright from Robotech for another 10 hours.

    3. Re:No. by jkflying · · Score: 2

      How about some Charlie the Unicorn and Salad Fingers while we're at it?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    4. Re:No. by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look, we can't afford genuine RIAA Nazgul, OK?

      That kind of evil doesn't come cheap!

    5. Re:No. by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just mention that Rachel might have stolen the recording from a copyrighted source and they will come.

    6. Re:No. by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Don't forget 'Amazing Horse'

      Amazing Horse. It's just...amazing!

  28. Hmmmm -- timing coincidental? by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The skeptic in me thinks the FTC knew who these companies were all along. Five companies account for millions of unwanted calls a day, and disregard the DNC list? Seems that an operation like that would be hard to hide. Maybe the political pressure got to be too much and FTC felt they had to act? I'm not complaining, just asking why we had to put up with it for several years before there was any regulatory action.
    "Round up the usual suspects."

    1. Re:Hmmmm -- timing coincidental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should spend 10 minutes researching the history of this case (and how the regulatory agencies work in general) instead of jumping to the nastiest conclusion possible with no evidence.

    2. Re:Hmmmm -- timing coincidental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory would be more sinister. They want people unhappy with the 'untracable' caller id system. You would think anyone who was scammed by this company would have reported them to the FTC right away. They have to have names and credit card trails to follow. But, by allowing these people to annoy the masses... They get everyone on board with fully traceable electronic phone communications. But via cell phones, networks, and ip addresses.

      Get everyone enraged about spoofed Caller ID, and then push a bill to abolish caller id spoofing. Subtlety worded in the bill is the surrender of any rights to anonymity. You want to catch anonymous phone callers? Now every call is tracker. Maybe it isn't a bad idea.

      Then again, sometimes it's nice being an anonymous coward.
       

  29. She's NOT gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rachel has now turned to your electric bill and savings that you can get from the government. This is the new scam that has started just this last week.

    One down, hundreds of dirt bags to hunt down and kill.

  30. Now how will people get listed on Google? by retroworks · · Score: 1

    I kept putting off the robo call at my business, offering me help to maintain my company website listing on Google. What will I do now?

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Now how will people get listed on Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take them up on it. It's obviously legit because Google.

  31. Next on the chopping block by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

    Can they do something about the one where some guy calls you, blasts a loud boat horn in your ear, and then tells you that this is your captain and you have won a free cruise or something like that? After getting a few of those I want to make "captain" walk the plank.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    1. Re:Next on the chopping block by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Poke the button to get a real person, talk very quietly so they bump up the volume, then blow a boat horn in their ear. $11.56 on Amazon.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Next on the chopping block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, next on the chopping block should be Google Voice, seeing as how a sufficient number of robocallers use it.

  32. If the geneal public wasn't so dumb... by Vermonter · · Score: 1

    ...Then these companies would not make enough profit by scamming people, and it would stop. The fact that this continues for so long, and there are multiple companies doing this, makes me weep for humanity.

  33. In the old days, this never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the old days, business was more interested in generating local business and keeping a good name, rather than annoying customers. In the last 10-15 years, something changed, and "We Want More Of Your Money" became the new rule. An annoyed customer who swore never to do business with them again, wasn't much of a customer anyway. Business 'gamed' the telephone system. Its an offshoot of email and the mail system. My uncle once said that people who complained about mass market email were just a bunch of anti-business communists. A few years later, after removing 20 million unsolicited emails from his inbox, his tune changed. Its been changed for the duration. Likewise unsolicited mail, and unsolicited phone calls. 'Gaming the system' is something business has been trying a lot, and doing a lot, and thank God for regulation and legislation that keeps them from taking advantage of public utilities and services to the detriment of all others. Why does it seem like regulation knows no bound? Because on the other side is greed, which really has no bound.

  34. The most annoying thing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most annoying thing about Cardholder Services is that I know the bank I used to work for actually branded themselves as "Cardmember Services" for customer service, because they had so many cobrands and partners (airlines, hotels, etc - each with their own card branding). Which means that the legitimate bank using that name lent credence to the frauds who followed after.

    I raised a concern about it back when they first started doing it (years ago), but was just a lowly programmer who clearly couldn't understand the intricacies and nuances of branding.

    1. Re:The most annoying thing by PRMan · · Score: 1

      This. We recently disputed a credit card charge and I got a call from "April" at "Cardmember Services". Yeah, right. I hung up on her. The phone rang right back. It was April again. She was calling about our dispute. I said, "Sorry." She said, "Yeah, I get that a lot."

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:The most annoying thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, register.com uses sites like "secureresellerservices.com" and "my-support-account.com" for customers to do maintenance on their domains. I thought it was some fly-by-night scammer the first time I got directed there. Royally stupid.

  35. When Rachel calls, I waste their time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I work from home. I get 1-3 calls from Rachel per day.
    Politely asking to be added to the do not call list does not work.
    I hate these jack asses and made it my mission to annoy them back.

    If everyone wastes their time, the business model is unprofitable.

    Here is what I do... Play along answering questions until they start asking questions to close the deal. When they ask your name, say, "This is Rachel with card services with important news!"
    LOL

    Sometimes they hang up, sometimes they curse you.

    The cursing ones are fun to engage.
    Had a few nice friendly sales voice turn ghetto.
    Good times.....

    1. Re:When Rachel calls, I waste their time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer, "Oh hold on, something on the stove is boiling over", you then set the kitchen timer for 10 minutes to remind yourself to hang up. It's been years since I've had to do this though. Now I just get the occasional spam text and a robot that claims to be Progressive wanting to update my insurance information. There's no point in wasting a robot's time.

    2. Re:When Rachel calls, I waste their time. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just ask her what she's wearing.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  36. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by gauauu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know how they actually get any "business" -- the last 3 times they've called me, I've tried playing along to see how the scam works. Somewhere along the line, as I'm telling them what my current interest rate is, they always hang up on me. It blows my mind.

    One time, though, I had fun -- my other routine is to try to explain to the poor schmuck on the line (who is probably an underpaid normal person who can't find a better job) that they are working for scammers and probably should find a different job. One lady from "Card Services" started yelling at me about how they weren't scammers, they were a organization that wants to help people and that they never break the law, and that my phone number must not actually be on the do-not-call list if they called me, because they follow the rules. It was hilarious, she carried on for 5 or 10 minutes shouting at me, and she sounded like she actually believed it.

  37. 24/7/365? by Bill+Evans · · Score: 1

    What is that, the number of hours in seven years?

    --
    Oh, this Beta, it is not so good.
    1. Re:24/7/365? by omnichad · · Score: 4, Funny

      I assure you that there are far more than .01 hours in 7 years.

  38. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by Genda · · Score: 1

    It seems the FTC has identified the miscreants. How about a couple million people converge on these places and the government just looks the other way for about... oh 10 hours. Problem solved with extreme prejudice!

  39. Not actually associated with my bank by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    Thank god. I talked to one of these idiots a long time ago.... I ask "what bank does this card belong to?" They say "It's your card ending in 9999" I say, that's not what I asked and hang up.

    I hope they get the death penalty. Nothing less is warranted - same goes for spammers and virus authors.

  40. Free market solution: Cancel your phone service by cockpitcomp · · Score: 1

    The phone company would quickly find a solution if enough people gave up on their land line and canceled service.

  41. Now Kill Jake from Google Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is just no way to get him to stop callilng me.

  42. CYOA by FTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article does not deal with the real issue: what the FSCK took the so long to track down the outfit(s) making these calls.

    The article reads like a press release from the FTC (which it almost certainly is). I mean, they get 200,000 complaints a month and it takes them 1 year to track down where these calls are coming from? Sheesh.

  43. I will miss Rachel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She was really good in bed. She came over every time I asked and never complained. Never asked me to put on a condom.
    Sometimes she leaked air and I had to find the hole to patch it, but once that was done she was as good as ever, always willing to please!

  44. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by mounthood · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    sluts? Misogyny on Slashdot shouldn't be ignored, or dismissed as a joke. (and shame on the mods too)

    --
    tomorrow who's gonna fuss
  45. Kill them all, let God sort them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FTC could probably clear a good portion of this year's federal deficit by selling tickets to these bastards' hangings. Pay-per-view, anyone?

    the [FTC] Robocall Challenge offering $50,000 to anyone who can create what the agency calls "an innovative way to block that will block illegal commercial robocalls on landlines and mobile phones."

    Publicly execute the fuckers when you catch them. They'll stop.

    1. Re:Kill them all, let God sort them out by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Publicly execute the fuckers when you catch them. They'll stop.

      You'd think so, but we used to do public executions for even petty theft. Doesn't stop people from being greedy and stupid.

      It does keep the jails a lot less crowded, however, so please don't think I am arguing against the idea....

  46. How I stopped the calls from Rachel & her coho by phunster · · Score: 1

    I would always press one. Get a telemarketer on the phone, tell them I'm drowning in credit Card debt and don't see a way out. Let them give their rap, and give them a generated fake CC number. Of course the CC number would check out but the expiration date would not. I would tell them that I had the card in front of me and everything I had given them was correct. All of this of course waisted time they could have spent ripping someone off. It didn't take long before the calls stopped coming.

    The other thing I like to do with telespammers is answer "Name of Town, Police Department, Officer Smith, How may I help you." That never fails to get you off a list. Of course it's a bit discombobulating when it turns out to be a legitimate call.

  47. uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh crap.. that was a scam!?

  48. Now get "Tom" from "Home Protection" by McKing · · Score: 2

    As a geek, I was intrigued at the programming behind his response tree, but he is clearly a robot, albeit a very well-programmed one.

    --
    If only "common" sense was actually that common...
  49. Oh darn... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I was going to ask her out.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  50. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    She identifies herself as Rachel, troll. Climb off that high horse back under your bridge.

  51. Dear God, No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All very well, but surely one could do far worse.

  52. (almost) October Surprise by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    This is WAY better than Bin Laden.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  53. I had a good response. by InterGuru · · Score: 1

    I am retired and have time to kill. At each call I strung them along, answered all the questions. When they asked me for my credit card number, I said that I have to go and get it. A minute later I picked up the phone and gave them a fake credit card number. (The first 4 digits should match a real card as there are only a few allowable codes. ). The number did not go through of course. I apologized and gave them another fake number. When that didn't go through I thanked them for making my day less lonely and asked them the call again. What is amazing is they didn't get the hint and kept calling.

    1. Re:I had a good response. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your service.

    2. Re:I had a good response. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am retired and have time to kill.

      Well, there are only twelve defendants, so it shouldn't take too much of your time.

  54. Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tell everyone I can that telemarketers are scammers.

    No exceptions.

    After all, we're on the "Do Not Call List", these people ignore it thereby violating the law making them criminals.

    Yes I know that charities and politicians are exempted but consider this, when it comes to charities, most if not ALL the money and then some goes to the telemarketer.

    And as far as politicians are concerned, well, we all know they are liars and cheats - no exceptions.

    And lastly, STOP GIVING or doing business over the phone!!! It only encourages these assholes!

  55. Although... by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    perhaps there's some vigilante justice out there.

    According the the complaint, one of the companies was run by Christopher L Miano and Dana M Miano, and operated as A+ Financial, out of 10258 S US Highway 1, Port Saint Lucie, FL. The other companies were created and run by Willy Plancher and Valbona Toska, and was in the Longwood/Winter Park/Altamonte Springs, Florida area. Their last known address was 383 Emerson Plaza, Suite 416, Altamonte Springs, FL.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  56. Where will I direct my rage now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hated those calls. I wanted to punch rachel in the box. There were times when I spent the time on the phone to get to a real person and I would give them a bunch of fake info, just to waste their time.

    1. Re:Where will I direct my rage now? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I hated those calls. I wanted to punch rachel in the box.

      Voice, kipper, or dirt?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  57. How deep does the rabbit hole go? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1
    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:How deep does the rabbit hole go? by ThePromenader · · Score: 1
      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  58. Just got a call from Rachel on my cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are more of them out there !

  59. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But in this case we'll make an exception.

  60. Rockroll telemarketers by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    If I get an really persistent telemarketer I tell them my wife needs to be on the call because she has the credit card..
    Then I hit conference call and dial the Rock Roll hotline. Sit on the line and see how long they listen before giving up.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  61. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    I just ask for their corporate mailing address... if they're playing by the rules, then they know that they have an obligation to provide it upon request. If they refuse, I point them at the appropriate laws and ask them to explain themselves... usually they hang up at that point. They haven't called me in a while, actually... maybe they clued in and blocked my number.

    Also, they're scammers... if you have a reasonable interest rate on your cards, then there's a good chance you know what the hell you're doing with your money, and aren't a good target for scamming. Though I did have one of their lackies try telling me that they could beat the 7% interest I pay on my Visa (not an introductory rate, a negotiated rate based on my credit rating and not carrying a balance).

  62. Re:Or pay our debts! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    First off you are not protected on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as the debt was incurred before it was made. It is grandfathered which is why debt collection agencies are purchasing it because they are free from prosecution. Only new debt after it was made can be applied.

    I am going to get flamed here or modded down ... but you are expected to pay them.

    People who do not pay back their debt have no integrity and do not keep their word. You made a promise to pay them no matter what, you agreed to the terms, and it is been what?? 20 years?!

    Be responsible! At least try with a payment plan if you want anyone like a car dealership or a bank to trust you again. Hate the debt collectors all you want but if I owed you money and the repo man was about to take your car away because you had to pay off my own debt would you not be pissed off hounding me on paying back too? You would and probably be threatening to sue me as well.

  63. YEEEEAAAAA!!! by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    FUCK YEA! GO FTC! I've been getting calls from that bitch for a long time.

  64. Re:Bank executives by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Then why are not the bank executives in jail? BOA and Chase already pleaded guilty yet the owners are not going to jail nor are any employees. They just pay a fine and use it as a tax write off and continue.

    piercing of the vail is commonly used to pay back taxes and other lawsuits as well. I have not ever seen it for criminal and I wish they would. If the CEOs get jailtime and so do executives then you bet your ass they wont make shady deals. Rachel included should be in jail and sued otherwise she will just move to India and run another shell company there and continue while claiming she didn't break any laws as she was in another country.

  65. I was wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a call from 'Home insurance services' and was all like, what happened to card-holder services?

  66. "just following orders" didn't fly in Nuremburg by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Probably not. It was probably just a good voice acting gig to her, that help paid the bills.

    OOOOHHHHHHHHH she had BILLS to PAY!
    Probably mouths to feed, and a mortgage, too!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:"just following orders" didn't fly in Nuremburg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case that excuse makes sense. It's very possible she had no idea what she was helping. Would you hold the actors responsible in the Yazz commercials for the product hurting people?

    2. Re:"just following orders" didn't fly in Nuremburg by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      No, I wouldn't blame them for the product...I'd blame them for being annoying or not calling out the writer of the commercial for the hokey-ness of them.

  67. Challenge by chispito · · Score: 1

    Somebody please provide a direct dial for this outfit. I keep getting hung up so I can't even properly waste their time. As a humorous aside, I received a robocall while I was reading through the comments in this thread. No kidding, I did.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  68. I once made a similar system... by Sanians · · Score: 1

    I once made something similar, by attaching my telephone line to my sound card input and decoding the Caller ID information in software.

    http://www.ecstaticlyrics.com/electronics/telephone/CallerID/

    Rather than play the three tones, however, I simply attached a relay to my parallel port so that the computer could pick up and then hang up the line.

    That actually makes them stop calling as well. I guess they're smart enough to realize they're just wasting their time when they get hung up on every time, but not smart enough to realize they're wasting their time when you've ignored the previous hundred messages they've left on your answering machine.

    You can also combine it with a phone that you can configure not to ring until it has Caller ID information (by setting different rings for different callers, and thus getting no ring at first since it doesn't have the Caller ID info yet) and you won't even hear the phone ring when the morons call.

  69. Simple solution by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Require that she and all of the workers from those companies list their numbers and address on the net. Then we will not have any more of this nonsense.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  70. "Slut" is misogynist, period. by Hizonner · · Score: 1

    Why is the word "slut" used as an insult? Because apparently some people think the worst thing a woman can do is like sex, have a lot of it, and not be anybody's property. I guess that makes people nervous. Of course, it seems a lot of people think the second worst thing a woman can do is be a "stuck-up cockteasing bitch".

    So, basically, any woman who wants to make her own sexual choices is going to get shit for it unless her choices exactly match what somebody else wants. Which changes from person to person and from moment to moment. So she's really just shit out of luck.

    Which sucks. And is specific to women. So perpetuating it is misogynistic. Even when women do it. Which many do.

    It's not misogynistic because somebody guessed that a woman was female. It's misogynistic because it's always misogynistic to use "slut" as an insult. Every time. Regardless of how much sex somebody does or does not have, and regardless of whether or not that has anything to do with whatever's being discussed.

    You have no license to use the word, ever. People will call you on it. Grow up and deal with it.

    1. Re:"Slut" is misogynist, period. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Geez, you didn't have to be such a dick about it...

  71. Re:Or pay our debts! by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

    Grandfathered or not, it's still past the statute of limitations so legally they can't do shit to collect it.

    As far as paying back debt goes, people may start with the best of intentions but life doesn't always make it easy. If a debt goes bad, lenders have insurance for that so they get paid either way. Creditors destroy debt contracts every few years.. .doing that effictively absolves the debt since once the contract is gone there is no longer any way to prove the borrower is responsible. Third party collectors buy these bad debts for pennies on the dollar so they sue... They are lawsuit mills and it's an investment for them. Fuck those guys, the borrower never had any prior dealings with them so there is no obligation AT ALL. If it's an unsecured debt, then tough shit... the burden is on the plaintiff to prove guilt and without a contract there is no real way to do that.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  72. Re:Or pay our debts! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    You're assuming the debt is legitimate. They can and do completely invent debts out of thin air.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  73. She's Not Dead Yet by Freddybear · · Score: 1

    I just got another call from Rachel at 5:07 PM EDT.

    1. Re:She's Not Dead Yet by davidannis · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I just got one too. I try to waste their time with a live operator occasionally, but they have gotten very good at figuring out that you are stalling.

  74. Re:Or pay our debts! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Well trying not to be too much of a dick here but I can not invent a debt upon you and demand payment. You have to agree to it. Try they can put in changes in fees like with ATM cards but not if you had no debt in the first place.

    20 years is a long time not to pay. Not like you borrowed some money and got laid off 6 months ago but over a decade old!

  75. Re:Or pay our debts! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Statue of limitations apply to laws broken. Not private contracts such as debt. This is a civil issue.

    No it is not insured as we found out with AIG what happens when financial companies get crazy with instruments. They do not destroy contracts but just sell them. They are sold to third party collectors and yes shame on the person who hurt the bank and forced them to do so, not debtor as they just lost A TON of money after a 3rd party person buys it.

    It is not the banks money or the CEOs money. It is the peoples money. It is the grandma's living off her savings which the debtor (grandparent) splurged on and then didn't pay back forcing her and the bank to take the loss by selling it for pennies on the dollar. Yes the burden is on the plaintiff as he didn't honorably obligie on the contract. Yes the collection agency does have the original copy.

    You may hate them and view them as parasites like the repo men but they do serve society a fuction. Unlike Wallstreet traders. They keep interest rates for the rest of us and enable those of us who are hurting financial who need a car but have been honest to get one! Without these players it would be impossible to get a car at all if you made under $50k a year! How do I know you are going to pay me back?

    FYI I am not a hearltess asshole as I am going through struggles myself and sometimes people go through hard times. It is very humiliating to have people call you a loser and harass you and threaten to take your car away etc. But that is what you are if someone else paid for it. Now if this poor sap had been just unemployed for 6 months then I can see your point. But 20 years?! Wow ... I would not loan him anything!

  76. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just start screaming expletives at them. Doesn't help much, but it's cathartic.

    Later I report the call to the FCC

  77. Re:Or pay our debts! by pwizard2 · · Score: 1
    You wouldn't happen to be a collector, would you?

    Statue of limitations apply to laws broken. Not private contracts such as debt. This is a civil issue.

    Not true. A statute of limitations definitely applies to debt and civil matters. It varies by state/issue but for debt it is 3-5 years most of the time. If the time since the debt went bad > the time allowed under statute, then they can't touch it ever again. Period. They can try but you can smack them down HARD in court. If they put old debt on your credit report, you can sue them for libel and get 3X damages. There's lot of ways to fight if you know your rights. Unsecured debt collectors act like assholes and try to intimidate people because that's all they can do for the most part... if you're a debtor the law is on your side and collectors don't want you to know that. They're counting on people to act like ignorant marks who just grab their ankles and take it.

    With secured debt (car loan, mortgage, etc.) they can repo your stuff unless you initiate bankruptcy, which just buys you time to work it out. In the case of unsecured credit card debt, there's not much they can do if the debt is old enough and you know your rights + choose to fight.

    Yes the collection agency does have the original copy.

    ...Says you. I've fallen on hard times and had debt problems in the past. During discovery all they sent me were receipts/statements going back 2 years on a credit card account 10 years old. No contract. Bills and statements don't mean shit because it doesn't prove that I ever opened the account and am therefore responsible for it. You better believe they would have had sent a copy of the contract (they save the original for court) if they had it. I beat that case. The original creditor is never the one who sues... it's always one of those slimy collection attorney groups. Even if the contract for an old account still exists, they still have to find it in order to claim it. If they don't have it at the hearing, it doesn't matter if it exists or not...they still lose.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  78. Re:Bank executives by sribe · · Score: 1

    Then why are not the bank executives in jail? BOA and Chase already pleaded guilty yet the owners are not going to jail nor are any employees. They just pay a fine and use it as a tax write off and continue.

    piercing of the vail is commonly used to pay back taxes and other lawsuits as well. I have not ever seen it for criminal and I wish they would. If the CEOs get jailtime and so do executives then you bet your ass they wont make shady deals. Rachel included should be in jail and sued otherwise she will just move to India and run another shell company there and continue while claiming she didn't break any laws as she was in another country.

    - Neither BoA nor Chase has plead guilty to anything.

    - Fines are not tax deductible.

    - Thousands of executives go to prison every year. The corporate veil is only about protecting personal assets from civil proceedings--you have not ever seen mention of piercing the corporate veil for criminal trial because it is completely irrelevant.

  79. Re:Or pay our debts! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    No, they can and do invent a debt and demand payment. They can't ding your credit score for a fake debt. They can't contact you about fake debt if you've initiated action under the fdcpa. But there's absolutely nothing stopping them from just cold calling people and asking for money for something they made up (or something they bought from someone who made it up). It costs them very little to do, and there are absolutely no consequences to them unless they persist after fdcpa action.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  80. must not have worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a call from Rachel this afternoon...

  81. Public enemy number one... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    I guess that's one person who's not happy Obama popped bin Laden

  82. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by Tom · · Score: 1

    It was hilarious, she carried on for 5 or 10 minutes shouting at me, and she sounded like she actually believed it.

    She probably did.

    For the low-paying ground-level jobs, it is easier to fool people than to convince them to participate in a crime.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  83. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    They usually sense hesitation and hang up, thinking you are playing them. I have been hung up on many times when I expressed interest. Usually over 20% will work, but it you say you have no idea and let them lead you, they would let you by.

    They don't want people who know their interest rate.

    My standard answers were:
    Well, I have 2 cards, and I think my girlfriend has at least one in my name
    Honestly, I have no idea how much money. One card is over $5k, and I'm sure the other is a lot more.
    I couldn't even tell you the interest rate. Yeah, twenty something sounds familiar, I think I saw that.

    Then they lead me around and I waste as much time as possible.

    Apparently they charge $200 or $300 to your card for the "service" of calling your bank and asking for a lower rate, which you can do yourselves almost without fail as long as you have a good payment history. Search google for the phone number, you'll get piles of hits for "who called me?" forums and lots of dirt. It's sad, because there are a lot of saps who admit to being taken. Thankfully, a small part of the victims do post what happened. I should say, a small part of the victims think to search the internet, a smaller part think to post, and a smaller part give details. Extrapolate and you got your victim pool.

    Think like an idiot. I get a Canadian station, "ION TV". Sometimes when I'm flipping channels they have "Smart Cookies", who advise people on finance. They play the same episodes of Gadget Girlz, Body Fuel, and Smart Cookies repeatedly. I think there was only one season of each.

    Anyway, the interviews with random people at the mall who don't know their balance or rate is very revealing. They buy a sweater for 15% off and put it on a 23% card, paying the minimum.

    That's the entire reason your CC statement has changed, if you are American, is the government protecting stupid people like that from themselves. That's where they got the business.

  84. Didn't work too well by zetetikos · · Score: 1

    I just get a call from her about 5 minutes ago.

  85. Just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them go through their spiel, and if you get to talk to a real person, when they ask you how you want to pay, say you want to use your food stamp card (EBT card). Tell them thats the only credit card you have.

    For me the DNC list does not go far enough! It needs to apply to so called "charitable organizations" and especially to political canvasing calls! What I really want is a whitelist, where only callers on the whitelist get my phone (cell or landline) to ring. All others get a message that gives my hotmail email address and asks them to send an email stating the reasons that they think they should have the privilege of being allowed to call me.

    After all, I bought the phone, and pay for phone service. So I should get to decide who gets to call me on it. Telemarketing (and any offshoots like email spam etc...) needs to be totally stopped RIGHT NOW!

    I live in Iowa, and right now I get at least 6 (usually more) political BS calls a day. And I have already voted!

    I am about ready to get an answering machine and start screening calls. The outgoing message will start with the three tones you hear when you reach an out of service number, then I will say "If I know you, leave your name and I will get back to you. If I don't know you, state your business, name and number briefly, and I might call you back if its important to me. Or not.".

  86. Perhaps there's good reason? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    "Just two weeks after it challenged the public to come up with a better technological way to stop incessant robocalling, the Federal Trade Commission pulled the plug on five mass calling companies it said were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre-recorded calls from 'Rachel' and others from 'Cardholder Services.'

    I don't think the timing is a coincidence... I think a few months ago, a high-ranking FTC official was trying to figure out how to track and take down these companies, and took his work home with him. Having forgot to lock his home office's door, his 5 year-old daughter walked in, caught a glimpse of the topic, got a quick explanation, and recounted some playground incident that was vaguely similar that she figured out how to handle, and bluntly asked her daddy why he didn't just do something similar... which he and everyone else at the FTC had never thought-of, and which is now proving incredibly successful in practice.

    Instead of a website, maybe they need a souped-up magic 8-ball on their desks?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  87. Rachel is not dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just, this minute, got yet another call from Rachel at Cardholder Services.

    Not only are they doing telephone spam scam, they're violating the national do not call list.

  88. That didn't last long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rachel just rang me up.

  89. Re:YES! Kill the sluts by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    You're also fighting against a lot of cognitive dissonance.

    Good people shouldn't work for evil companies, after all, and only an evil company does things like ignore the DNC list and scam people. Therefore, if the company did do what GP said, the company would be evil, and she wouldn't be a good person, which she is. Reductio ad absurdam.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  90. She's Not Gone by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Friday, November 2, 2012, 9:33am PST. Just got a call from Rachel.

    1. Re:She's Not Gone by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      Yep. She just called me on Nov 2 at 3:53pm Eastern. I sometimes get the impression that our government is completely ineffective.

  91. I used to work for them by Jax+Omen · · Score: 1

    years ago, I worked for a company called Mutual Consolidated Savings, which is one of the many front companies for these operations. I was a grunt, not really informed of anything that was going on, but it was pretty obvious what was happening, I was the IT Admin's personal assistant, and I also transcribed "sales calls" (such as they were) to fight credit card chargebacks. They had a team of "financial specialists" which were people they pulled in off the street and gave jobs, and a team of "salespeople", which were the least-literate of the above group. And this was in a seedy part of Tacoma, WA, where those people are seriously bottom-rung people. I spent about 8 hours of my 10 hour day browsing webcomics, reading slashdot, and whatever else struck my fancy, 1 hour "transcribing" (which was literally copying and pasting the same conversation, doing a find-and-replace on the names as appropriate, and listening to the call once to confirm nothing weird went on. Only about 1/10 of the calls required any actual transcribing, and my transcripts WERE accurate, so I never got caught), and 1 hour in misc meetings/etc. IT was a joke, there was no security on the computers. They fired someone weekly for browsing porn at work. I installed a multiple-desktop application for Windows so I could keep my webcomics/etc invisible from a cursory overview. One day, we came into work, and the boss wasn't there. Nobody really thought much of it, figured he was sick or at a meeting somewhere. About 2 hours into the shift, the city police, state troopers, and FBI came into the building, shut everything down, and told us all to go file for unemployment. No joke: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823216/index.shtm Paul Morris Thompson is a sleazeball the kind of which you'd expect to sell used cars, and his wife was a Notary Public who kept everything looking legit. I miss that job, I made $10/hour to do nothing, now I make $10/hour talking to cell phone customers V_V Glad to hear the FTC is still after them, although I doubt it'll do any good.

  92. Not the whacking I was hoping for by nessman · · Score: 0

    They're not putting bullets in the heads of the people running these scams and dumping their corpses in the desert.

  93. The romurs of her death are greatly exagerrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rumors of her death are greatly exaggerated. She called me just now, nice to see she hasn't died.