Slashdot Mirror


US Military Signs Modernization Deal With Microsoft

Dupple writes with news that Microsoft has signed an agreement with the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, and the Defense Information Systems Agency to modernize the software those organizations use. According to Microsoft, the deal will cover 75% of all Department of Defense personnel, and bring to them the latest versions of SharePoint, Office, and Windows. The deal awards Microsoft $617 million, which is after discounts to the software totaling in the tens of millions. Interestingly, DISA's senior procurement executive said, "[The agreement] recognizes the shift to mobility. Microsoft is committed to making sure that the technology within the agreement has a mobile-first focus, and we expect to begin to take advantage of Microsoft’s mobile offerings as part of our enterprise mobility ecosystem."

138 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Mobile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "a mobile-first focus, and we expect to begin to take advantage of Microsoftâ(TM)s mobile offerings as part of our enterprise mobility ecosystem."
    NURSE!

  2. Hope it's not windows 8 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Hope it's not windows 8 on the desktop / laptops.

    1. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by idontgno · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too bad. It most certainly is:

      As part of this agreement, all three organizations can begin using the newest versions of Microsoft products, including Microsoft Office 2013, SharePoint 2013 Enterprise and Windows 8. The ability to standardize on SharePoint 2013 Enterprise will unlock new levels of cross-agency information sharing through improved enterprise search and social communications features while powering advanced business intelligence and reporting capabilities. Access to Office 2013 will equip each organization with the latest versions of productivity tools that personnel rely on every day, including Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel and Microsoft PowerPoint. The increasingly mobile DoD workforce will also use Windows 8 to empower productivity from any location, and any supported device, while taking advantage of enhanced security. The U.S. Armyâ(TM)s Network Enterprise Technology Command headquartered at Fort Huachuca, Ariz., and the Air Force Program Executive Office for Business and Enterprise Systems at Maxwell Air Force Base-Gunter Annex in Alabama, have been working closely with Microsoft on achieving Army Golden Master and Air Force Standard Desktop Configuration compliance for Windows 8.

      As the names imply, those two named configurations (Army Golden Master and Air Force Standard Desktop Configuration) are the standard desktop deploy images for the overwhelming majority of the normal day-to-day systems for those respective two services... and they're definitely transitioning to 8. So yaaay. I definitely picked a good time to get the hell out of the service.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not Windows 8 I'm concerned with... it's forcing Sharepoint on the Military...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by LifesABeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't help but wonder what the cost of using Open Source Solutions would have been? My main fear will not be some power like China obtaining secrets, but some bored 15 year old.

      I can see the head lines now,
      "Teenager aquires robotic mule and uses it to buy Hamburgers and Milk Shakes in a Prom Limo using him m$ phone."

    4. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Maybe it will be good: A contract this large, they could easily insist that special GPOs be created that allow locking a desktop into desktop-only mode; and possibly (fingers crossed) such a gpo could trickle down to the rest of us.

    5. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no problem that Sharepoint cant solve.

      The only concern is all the other problems it creates.

    6. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It could be worse... iOS 6.0 mapping software on drones. ;)

    7. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by mlts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm going to be a bit of a devil's advocate:

      There is one good thing about Windows 8 -- Metro apps, or whatever MS calls them now (Microsoft Store Apps.)

      These store their files in a restricted subdirectory in the user's homedir, and run in an extremely limited security context.

      What I want to see is a real Web browser as a Metro app. This way, if the browser or an add-on running under it gets taken over, it can't get to a full user context, much less get control of the machine [1]. Same with an IMAP client. This is not to replace existing MUAs and Web browsers, but a restricted place to browse privately [2] with less exposure possible to malicious software.

      I'm not a fan of workflow with Metro apps, but I do like the security contexts that limit things. It doesn't solve everything, but it is a good tool in a toolbox.

      [1]: Nothing is impossible, but restricted contexts are a good start.

      [2]: Pr0n sites, most likely.

    8. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      It's not Windows 8 I'm concerned with... it's forcing Sharepoint on the Military...

      Hey, anything that slows down their drone bombing campaigns is a net win.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      These store their files in a restricted subdirectory in the user's homedir, and run in an extremely limited security context.

      Thats the only good thing about them, and theyre so limited that it does me no good. Wonderful that skype cannot root my machine, but its worthless because it can only run full screen.

    10. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is no problem that Sharepoint cant solve.

      "Not enough money is spent on worthless consultants" is a problem that Sharepoint solves just fine.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    11. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I want to see is a real Web browser as a Metro app.

      Errr, well you know, Windows 8 ships with a Metro flavor of IE 10, and with recent versions of Chrome you can opt to have that run as a Metro app, too. I think Firefox might still be working on it. But there doesn't seem to be anything stopping you from trying one of the others out and seeing how it works for you.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think making someone who is heavily armed work with Sharepoint is not going to end well.

    13. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      That's a rather unfortunate indictment. or is the NMCI actually working, 8 or so years later?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    14. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The servers will no located off site. at least SharePoint will be 'up'.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    15. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can just throw more Sharepoint at it?

    16. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The worst I see is due to the same approach between MS Sharepoint and MS Exchange - once something goes into the database not much other than a healthy exact copy of the thing configured exactly the same way as the original that put it in there can get it out :(
      They'd better be planning for a lot of redundancy and be prepared to sacrifice a bit of speed. Instead of doing the obvious and pointing to where files are MS Sharepoint sucks the entire things into a database - which gets insane once people start putting multi-GB files into the thing. People sharing movie DVD images get noticed because it brings relatively swift systems down to an unusable crawl apparently.

    17. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Hope it's not windows 8 on the desktop / laptops."

      What military in its right mind would opt to choose closed-source, proprietary, and more to the point UNPROVEN software for their day-to-day operations?

      I have had some issues with the military before but I never thought they were actually stupid. This comes pretty close to changing my mind.

    18. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      So... have we been infiltrated by some backward enemy like North Korea, or what? April first is like three months away.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    19. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Maybe it was CDROM images then - either way the story was it made MS Sharepoint at one site unusable until that was found and they were removed.
      My point is that MS Sharepoint is currently a very poor choice to share files due to it's behaviour of sucking the entire things into a database. I'm hoping that is going to change. It adds an extra mode of failure for no benefit. All the database needs is a file location or it's own file storage area and it can do exactly the same job more quickly than sucking things into the database and spitting them out again each time.
      I think MS Exchange is finally allowing such a thing with file attachments instead of it's old method of sucking them all into a growing and slowing database.

    20. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by scsirob · · Score: 4, Funny

      The enemy is coming! Shoot! SHOOT!

      "Please log in to your Microsoft Windows Live account to access the 'Shoot' application" ... click-swipe-click-type-swipe...

      "Thank you. There are 6 friends and 17 enemies on-line. There is a new version of 'Shoot' available, do you want to upgrade?"
      Noo! ... click-swipe-click-type-swipe...

      "Please note that your current version of 'Shoot' is no longer supported. The application will be disabled"
      Arrrggh!!.... (*#@)

      Game Over.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    21. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by arendjr · · Score: 2

      What I think mlts means to say is he wants a browser that is implemented for Metro itself, not just presents itself there. Neither IE10 nor Chrome runs in the restricted sandbox like Metro apps.

    22. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by stenvar · · Score: 1

      "Teenager aquires robotic mule and uses it to buy Hamburgers and Milk Shakes in a Prom Limo using him m$ phone."

      At least it keeps him out of trouble.

    23. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by bob0the0mighty · · Score: 1

      Pretty standard for most DoD projects. Managers like "catchy" names.

    24. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I took a day out of my project to orient an advance team to the Novell servers I kept up. They finished up for lunch and informed us they would be replacing the Novell system entirely. No.need.to.continue.

      I know these were still up in 2010, and had been moved to New hardware. Submariners do not tolerate failure well, even onshore.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    25. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      This would make email attachments and any other file upload kind of a pain. Before you can open a file in the browser, you have to copy it to your browser's sandbox using an external tool.

    26. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Never forget that inteligence and stupidity are two separate issues, infact it takes a great deal of intellegence to accomplish exceedingly stupid things.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      They only use windows for e-mail and powerpoint, and this is essentially what the article is talking about.

      Everything else is running Unix/Linux or some custom piece of software (depending on the age of the hardware).

    28. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by tibman · · Score: 1

      I find it unlikely they will transition soon as they only started transitioning to vista two years ago. But sharepoint will probably be 2013 right after they can convert data from the previous version.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    29. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Spoiler: They dont suck as much as having a leg amputated, but they suck considerably more than a traditional desktop browser.

    30. Re:Hope it's not windows 8 by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Or would it? The earth is ~70% water. This means that if iOS 6.0 sends the rocket to a random location (that seems to be what iOS 6.0 does anyways), then only 30% of the bombs would hit land. I can't find anything concrete, but I'm guessing that the land part of the earth is about 10-15% populated (given the radium of a bomb blast). So 30% X 15% gives us about 4% chance of any given bomb hitting anybody versuse the near 100% chance of it hitting a person we don't like.

  3. subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the US will only be able to make war if they can figure out the Metro interface.

    1. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by bkmoore · · Score: 4, Funny

      so you're saying peace might have a chance after all.

    2. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      On the flip side, Im not sure that fitting all army personnel with Windows 8 / metro is really the best way to engender feelings of peace and goodwill.

    3. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      or they could have the same thing that most people who use windows 8 seriously use. A simple program that removes the metro interface and gives back the old start menu, making Windows 8 sleeker than windows 7, with a smaller memory footprint, and overall a much better OS.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    4. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Which they will never have authorization to install in their machines.

    5. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      800m contract. They can tell Microsoft to build it into their deployment.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    6. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whoever is this "they" you are talking about you may rest assure will ask for no such thing. The users, on the other hand, who will be infuriated by the Metro interface won't have a say on that.

    7. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      Meh. Even without Start8 or the like, the metro UI goes away with one click. The mild annoyance of the metro screen is more than offset by the far better performance of Win8.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    8. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      It does not go away. You keep having to come back to it to do many basic tasks and it keeps hindering you.

      And although Windows 8 performance is slightly better than Windows 7, it is very far from being that significant as you paint here. For most systems the difference is completely irrelevant. The hindrances of Metro Interface far outweighed any performance gain.

    9. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      500mb less baseline ram footprint is a huge difference, I don't know what kind of drugs you're on. And, while the metro UI is pointless, its no where near as hindering as you say. in some ways its more functional than the old start menu, though I prefer the old start menu due to 19 years of working with it.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    10. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      No, 500mb is not that relevant, especially when the average memory size of current computers is 4 GB. I challenge you to find me any benchmark analysis that place Windows 8 far ahead of Windows 7 in basically anything.

      But here goes one showing that only in Sleep/Wake and Boot times there is a significant improvement. In every other task the improvement is marginal when it exists at all. Windows 7 is even superior in some tests, like SSD benchmark, 3DMark, DX10 and DX9 anti-aliasing operations, and Battlefield 3 gameplay performance, :

      http://www.techspot.com/review/561-windows8-vs-windows7/

    11. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      And yet on my windows 7 rig with 6gb, I get memory out errors playing memory intensive games like minecraft and TOR, and my windows 8 rig with 6gb just hums right along. 500mb makes a world of difference.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    12. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You are either a liar or an idiot. I have dozens of machines running Windows 7 under my supervision and I have never got a single memory error in any of them when using very processor and memory intensive applications. Furthermore my personal machine is a little old and has 3 GB, with Windows 7 installed, and I never had absolutely any problems with Minecraft, even though I have played it a lot.

    13. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      Disable your page file and then see if you get errors. I disable mine because I have very limited hdd space. you WILL get errors in win7 if you do that. Its memory handling is atrocious.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    14. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You should never ever EVER disable your page file in Windows, it is strongly not recommended by MS to any version of Windows, including Windows 8. Windows is not made to work without a page file, period. Furthermore nobody should have 6 GB of RAM and a HD small enough to be unable to give at least 10 GB to your page file. That is what is called a very bad configuration, and it is certainly not the OS fault that you are utterly ignorant about system design.

    15. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by Kiraxa · · Score: 1

      and yet windows 8 works just fine without it. methinks you're just one of those people who hates something new because its new.

      --
      http://phelannguyen.blogspot.com/
    16. Re:subtle move by the anti-war crowd by fredprado · · Score: 1

      And I call you bullshit, but, even if you weren't blatantly lying, you would only have made the point that Windows 8 would be better for systems with extremely small hard disks in complete disproportion to their physical memory. I fear that this is hardly a selling point for Windows 8.

  4. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by sycodon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is my 1034-55/12 Authorization for Nuclear Strike form all garbaged up now?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Why is my 1034-55/12 Authorization for Nuclear Strike form all garbaged up now?

      That is because the internet enabled Nuclear Strike site is optimized for IE 6.

    2. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Just search Bing for how to Google your problem, then call your system administrator.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  5. FML by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for the dept of defense, and this just makes me cringe. Mobility? That sounds great, except the only electronic devices allowed in cleared spaces are old-skool one-way pagers. And the Army has been looking into getting Android devices for troops. So much for that apparently. The latest OS? They better fucking not load Windows 8 on my desktop. I'd say I would do something drastic, but more likely I'll just cry myself to sleep. And more Sharepoint? We use Sharepoint at work, and everyone hates it. We're currently looking at finding a suitable replacement. I'm going to go get a drink.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:FML by jgrahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And more Sharepoint? We use Sharepoint at work, and everyone hates it. We're currently looking at finding a suitable replacement.

      Isn't just about *anything* a suitable replacement for Sharepoint? Where I work it's used as a cruel and unfair parody of a wiki, so MediaWiki is one obvious replacement. Another replacement would be, I guess, a version control system like Git.

    2. Re:FML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good luck teaching your average paper pusher how to use git.

    3. Re:FML by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      The funny thing there is with all the micro and mobile technology circulating around that pager can now be a better spy device than anything 20 years ago.

    4. Re:FML by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      We use Sharepoint at work, and everyone hates it. We're currently looking at finding a suitable replacement. I'm going to go get a drink.

      What I love is this conversation:

      "Hey, where's form WTF-SRSLY-WTF?"

      "It's on SharePoint!"

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    5. Re:FML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to be an EMSEC manager for the Air Force. The entire EMSEC concept is based on outdated Cold War technology. It basically doesn't even apply in the states anymore, and they didn't even observe it at all in Baghdad. Frankly, I think the whole "no mobile devices in classified areas" policy is one of those things that they enforce without knowing why.

    6. Re:FML by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "I've heard in tales of legend that sharepoint is actually decent if you have an army of dedicated admins to keep it in some semblance of order."

      Just a legend, of course.

      The problem with Sharepoint is not that it's not easy to administrate. It's not even that it tends itself to create a disorganized nigthmare. The problem with Sharepoint is that it doesn't understand in the slightest the problem space it's supposed to fit in, sold to people absolutly ignorant to the problem they want to solve in first place.

    7. Re:FML by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It's quite funny, I just set up iframes in sharepoint to point to my mediawiki pages. works great.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:FML by Ian.Waring · · Score: 1

      Recommend Podio from Citrix....

  6. Bad Move by tom229 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow... Having just received a demo Surface and ATIV S I'd strongly advise the Army / Airforce to consult a second opinion.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  7. Hi, I'm Clippy by swschrad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see you want to obliterate Wackistan with 10 drops before their operatives poison Washington. Can I help?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  8. get them to load one of the 3rd party start menu f by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    get them to load one of the 3rd party start menus for 8 if they load it.

    But windows 8 in any big setting with no SP1 and windows 9 on the way soon (that may fix of the windows 8 issues) May end up in testing and by the time testing is done windows 8 may be as dead as ME was.

  9. Win 8 Tactile Systems instructions by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    Welcome to the MS experience - Metro. Shoot to kill in style!

    Instructions:

    To aim and launch missile:
    1) Swipe the screen to bring up the monitor section.
    2) Monitor your target and doubletap on the suspect.
    3) Swipe an "X" across each target you want to eliminate.
    4) Doubletap to confirm.

    If you get an error message: 16472112.13a41d1e.00123dq2.1337effd
    then please contact customer service. Thank you for sharing your Microsoft Experience.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Win 8 Tactile Systems instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Provided that the call center was not a previous target. Outsourcing, you know...

      ==//==

    2. Re:Win 8 Tactile Systems instructions by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      And later in the news:

      "A critical bug in a windows 8 application mistook a camera abroad for one used in the ops training center where the machine was located with disastrous consequences. Microsoft issued an apology to those lost & will be patching the bug sometime late next week."

    3. Re:Win 8 Tactile Systems instructions by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Provided that the call center was not a previous target. Outsourcing, you know...

      ==//==

      Oh that's easy. Bob from Mumbai over there asked if we restarted it yet?

  10. Yet another boondoggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for the DoD. I predict this will end up costing 10x as much, take at least 5 years longer than proposed and in the end deliver less than 30% of the functionality actually required. I've seen it happen time and again with only a few of the more egregious failures actually becoming public.

    1. Re:Yet another boondoggle by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I work for the DoD. I predict this will end up costing 10x as much, take at least 5 years longer than proposed and in the end deliver less than 30% of the functionality actually required.

      Thank you for the insider's report! I for one am glad to hear that the results will be so much better than everything else ya'll do.





      :P

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  11. and the Navy paid $700M earlier by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't the Navy under the "umbrella" of the Department o' Defense? Strangely, the linked article states that the Navy inked its own contract for $700 million (USA dollars) back in July of 2012.
    :>(
    How is that encouraging any sort of good volume pricing or agreements if each division (Military Branch) is negotiating its own separate deal with Microsoft individually. If there's anyone that could screw with the military contracting officers, it's IBM and Microsoft.
    :>)
    Then again, this kind of volume license contract could be what they had to do in order to be able to keep their downgrade capability to keep XP running on their older personal computers.

    1. Re:and the Navy paid $700M earlier by fermion · · Score: 2
      This is one of the reasons why sequestration would not be so bad. While each arm fo the service does have specific needs, it is hard to imagine that these needs extend to general IT and the like. Therefore, if the pentagon chose to, it could come up with a 5-10% reduction in spending.

      And yes, social service can also find saving. For instance, if Congress allowed medicare part D to aggressively negotiate costs, ut would save several billion dollars. We already are on track to punish hospitals that do not provide care. Getting rid of the middle vendors in the choice program would also save money.

      The problem with these is that all require the feds to go after big business who are getting fat off government contracts instead of competing in the market place. This reminds me of a conversation I heard a while back on conservative radio. Many millions of dollars was spent building a stadium for a school district. The contractor that called in did not have problem with the waste of money, just that he was not able to bid for the money. The host agreed that was a travesty without knowing why the contractor was not able to bid. I see this all the time, people not really concerned with the waste of money, but that they cannot get their cut.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:and the Navy paid $700M earlier by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons why sequestration would not be so bad. While each arm fo the service does have specific needs, it is hard to imagine that these needs extend to general IT and the like. Therefore, if the pentagon chose to, it could come up with a 5-10% reduction in spending.

      And yes, social service can also find saving. For instance, if Congress allowed medicare part D to aggressively negotiate costs, ut would save several billion dollars. We already are on track to punish hospitals that do not provide care. Getting rid of the middle vendors in the choice program would also save money.

      The problem with these is that all require the feds to go after big business who are getting fat off government contracts instead of competing in the market place. This reminds me of a conversation I heard a while back on conservative radio. Many millions of dollars was spent building a stadium for a school district. The contractor that called in did not have problem with the waste of money, just that he was not able to bid for the money. The host agreed that was a travesty without knowing why the contractor was not able to bid. I see this all the time, people not really concerned with the waste of money, but that they cannot get their cut.

      Isn't it great the Government is watching the fiscal cliff so carefully and cutting costs so carefully.

      We talk about not raising taxes for those who make over $250,000 and want to cut medicare, Social security, and other entitlements for those evil socialist freeloaders, but what is $700,000,000 extra between friends wink wink. That is freedom!

  12. Discount? by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The deal awards Microsoft $617 million, which is after discounts to the software totaling in the tens of millions.

    So... between $20 and $90 million out of a $617 million deal is 3.2%-14%. The most powerful military force in the world, and that's the best discount they could get? For sharepoint?

    1. Re:Discount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they spend quarter of that on open source development and save the world some money?

    2. Re:Discount? by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      We have this in Europe too, we call it subsidies and subsidies do not need discounts. :-)

    3. Re:Discount? by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Actually, the main part of this deal is that Microsoft changes it to an american flag... of, well, death.

    4. Re:Discount? by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Sigh, wrong parent...

  13. Gives new meaning to the term... by webdog314 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blue Screen of Death

  14. Paperwork the bigger problem... by TheDarAve · · Score: 4, Informative

    The DoD already has access through contract to that software. The problem isn't access / purchase of the software, the limitation is the security paperwork needed to USE any of that software! ( https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=22645 ) The security paperwork that is required can be long, very long, sometimes HUNDREDS of pages long, and take *YEARS* to get reviewed and approved! The DoD just keeps ADDING bureaucratic layers to this process every year as well! There's a point where the security paperwork just causes more harm than good. By the time you get the software solution engineered and approved, its already most of the way to being completely obsolete! You want to fix the software in the DoD? Fix the process that governs it! Streamline it, cut out the what has by now become multiple layers of unneeded CRAP that's only there because a spot failed at some point, and the solution they came up with simply involved just adding more layers to an already unruly behemoth!

    TL;DR - Good luck M$! By the time you get Windows 8 approved, it'll be 4-8 years later.

    1. Re:Paperwork the bigger problem... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      The DoD already has access through contract to that software. The problem isn't access / purchase of the software, the limitation is the security paperwork needed to USE any of that software! ( https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=22645 ) The security paperwork that is required can be long, very long, sometimes HUNDREDS of pages long, and take *YEARS* to get reviewed and approved! The DoD just keeps ADDING bureaucratic layers to this process every year as well!

      Why does this make it seem that the US military is becoming more and more like the Vogon armed forces.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  15. good, good, good! by drankr · · Score: 5, Funny

    We in Europe welcome this development.

  16. and how well will that work?? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and how well will that work?? will they be desktop mode most of the time??? What about non metro apps.

    What about the army mac os severs?

    1. Re:and how well will that work?? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy.

      They'll all be touch screens with custom launches for the military market. Where you and I might see "marketplace" or "social" or "XBox Live", they'll get options like "Attack" "Retreat" and "Leak classified documents to Assange"

      Idiotproof, really.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:and how well will that work?? by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and how well will that work?? will they be desktop mode most of the time???

      Probably. I know my Windows 8 machine is. It's basically just Windows 7, only it uses fewer resources. Don't believe the people who tell you the Start Screen is some kind of apocalypse. It's easy to ignore. I think it would be a dumb move for the military to sign a deal like this only to stick with Windows 7, actually.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:and how well will that work?? by 4pins · · Score: 2

      I have been running Window 8 for nearly a month and I have found the start screen/metro impossible to ignore. The start screen keeps taking over and other metro interface components (most often the charms bar) keep popping up while I am working with classic applications. What am I missing? Is there a setting? Perhaps a script? I am already running a start menu replacement.

      I know I said previously that running it this way was a mistake. However when many people are telling me to try something and many more are asking me about it, I feel it is only right to give it a real chance.

      --
      I will not mourn that which I never had to lose. - Unknown
    4. Re:and how well will that work?? by Esteanil · · Score: 2

      I find the removed/hidden functionality much harder to ignore than the start screen, which I (in fact) almost find myself missing in Win7.

      For instance, wifi has become way more of a bitch than it was in Win7 and access to wifi status (seeing how much data is/has been transmitted, etc) seems to be missing.

      Well, that and the crashes/failures to awake from sleep.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    5. Re:and how well will that work?? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Yeah.

      Pressing "Attack" will signal a retreat
      Pressing "Retreat" will leak classified documents to Assange
      Pressing "Leak classified documents to Assange" will signal everyone to attack you

      Of course, the buttons will be too small and closely placed together for you to be able to accurately select the appropriate one using your finger, so you'll need to carry a stylus with you at all times.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    6. Re:and how well will that work?? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      For instance, wifi has become way more of a bitch than it was in Win7 and access to wifi status (seeing how much data is/has been transmitted, etc) seems to be missing.

      Mouse to taskbar. Click on Network icon in the system tray. A big Network panel pops up from the right of the screen showing all the networks you're connected to and all the Wi-Fi networks that are available. Right click on the one you're connected to, choose "Show estimated data usage" from the menu. That took me less than ten seconds to figure out and I'd never even tried to find out my data usage before. I'd say that's pretty intuitive.

      Well, that and the crashes/failures to awake from sleep.
      That's definitely a hardware problem, most likely related to bad/outdated drivers.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  17. windows for warships 8 now with touch screen guns by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    windows for warships 8 now with touch screen guns.

    IT"s never been easier to go to war sign up to day!!

  18. Re:get them to load one of the 3rd party start men by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    Last time I came across a guy with ME was 09, and he was one of those users, who's computer nobody in their sane mind would willingly touch, so there's definitely a nitch for windows 8 user statuses here.

  19. Re:Too late by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    When youre dealing with a $600 million contract, I have a feeling the customer gets pretty much whatever they want. If they say "Hook us up with Windows 2000", I think MS will comply.

  20. Not all by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

    They are also aquiring Sharepoint. So any war will probably have a half life of around two years untill all the data is forgoten.

  21. Not likly... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    At least here in the Department of Defense, we have so many applications that will have to be tested and certified on any new OS before they install across the board, Win9 and maybe Win10 will be out by that time.

    We never had Vista, and we only switched from XP to Win7 last year.

    I don't expect to see Win8 here... It's not the OS, it's the upgrade path for things that must run on the OS.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  22. Single Source is a Security Risk by RudyHartmann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am in the semiconductor business. Of course we know how heavily dependent the military is on this technology. But yet, often times when a piece of military hardware is built, there is a requirement for a second source. This is in case the first source should falter in delivery. It's a security issue based on that. Why is this any different with software? If the military were to commit themselves to free open source software, they would be more soundly in control of their own security and destiny. This Microsoft deal doesn't make sense at all.

    --
    Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
    1. Re:Single Source is a Security Risk by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      There are a great many people in the Pentagon who seem to understand this principle with regards to everything except software. I don't get it either.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Single Source is a Security Risk by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense when you factor in cronyism and economic-nationalism. There's a sense that, if money is going to be spent, it should be spent on products made by a US for-profit firm. The military is almost always the most conservative and nationalistic institution a country has, maybe only second to a State Church which doesn't exist in the US.

      Also, don't underestimate ideology. The principles of FLOSS sounds a lot like communism/socialism to people for whom those words still have huge negative, evil, connotations. A good old fashioned money-making American firm is more trustworthy than some Finn who gave his kernel away to the world, at least to the people making these decisions. There'd also be a lot less money changing hands going the FLOSS route, and that's just unacceptable in many circles.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Single Source is a Security Risk by RudyHartmann · · Score: 1

      Granted, the license terms of FLOSS definitely has the look and feel of a socialist ideology. And yes, the military is very conservative. I actually am the father of two sons in the USMC. But aside from the politics (which makes me cringe) FLOSS is "open". One is free to dissect the code and alter it on a whim. I actually also think Windows 7 is a decent product.. I do not like 8 at all. But right now I am doing this reply using Linux Mint 14 KDE. With Microsoft as a partner, the software also becomes an extra security risk from an outside source. I wonder how much code is actually written in the US now and not outsourced to India or another county.

      I am also not a Microsoft hater, as is fashionable in many circles. I just think this is a poor and expensive choice. It is not the job of the military to subsidize US companies either. Their job is to kill people and break things. I know this sounds brutal. But it is what it is.

      --
      Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
  23. Re:Has anyone.. by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nope. Surface won't fly.

  24. Approval process and applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, the DOD moves at a glacial pace when it comes to approval and implementation of computer software. The DISA approval alone will take years. Back in '98-99 when I was the administrator of my command's network, the massive Dell computer acquisition contract was fast-tracked only because Y2K was staring everyone in the face and there was an absolute panic to get it implemented as soon as possible. We made it happen in time, but just barely. The government is simply incapable of doing anything in a timely manner. It's the reason I have no hair today.

    The other thing to consider is the thousands of military applications used throughout every branch of the service, many of which are still legacy apps which hardly ever get updated and for which no documentation of any kind exists. Who gets to re-write and certify all those applications in anything like a timely manner?

  25. I bet it hits $1,000,000,000 before failing by kawabago · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'll bet the military will spend a billion dollars before realizing nothing is ever going to work, except the BSOD.

    1. Re:I bet it hits $1,000,000,000 before failing by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But of course they won't admit failure, they'll just feed us some BS about modernizing to stay ahead of changing dynamics on the global stage, with a need to keep options open while refocusing to combat ever changing threat vectors for AMERICA, and mission accomplished. And oh yeah, they're gonna need another tril for that.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:I bet it hits $1,000,000,000 before failing by Hymer · · Score: 1

      Oh, that they already missed back in 1998, the case of the USS Yorktown... http://gcn.com/articles/1998/07/13/software-glitches-leave-navy-smart-ship-dead-in-the-water.aspx
      The problem is as always: the smart old guys has retired and the new guy need to show that he can do better than the old guy.

    3. Re:I bet it hits $1,000,000,000 before failing by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I am amazed how far down in the discussion I had to scroll before seeing that tired old link.

  26. BRB by frisket · · Score: 1
    Great. So the Prez gets a Big Red Button on a Win8 tablet.

    What could possibly go wrong?

  27. Is this a way to sell more Surface devices? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

    Just wondering.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  28. Forcing Sharepoint on the Military? by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    I do some maintenance for an educational establishment, who have Sharepoint deployed internally for staff use, the last Sharepoint post there was two years ago, they do seem to find use for Moodle ...

    --
    AccountKiller
  29. Re:At least they can leave IE 6 by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    DOD and the pentagon still use IE 6 according to other slashdotters, and Navy still uses IE 7.

    If I had a gun to my head I would pick Windows 8 if I could use a somewhat HTTP graphical application called a browser, since IE 6 really is not a browser because it is proprietary.

    But man windows 8 is irritating.

  30. Navy finally moving to Windows 7 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Along with IE 8. Woo Hoo. So long XP and IE 7.

  31. Fiscal cliff cuts... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Well, there is $617M in pentagon cuts if cognress can't get its act together regarding the fiscal cliff.

  32. Who is the moron responsible for such by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    a stupid decision and what rock have they been living under that they have no personal knowledge of Windows and its shortcomings?
    Why would anyone with ANY windows experience think that it would be a good idea for our military to be using it?

    We deserve the government we get because we are stupid and vote for idiots.

    I think it's time to move to Canada!

    1. Re:Who is the moron responsible for such by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Guess they completely forgot the lessons supposedly learned on the LandWarrior project. Dump Windows with it's inherent insecure focus and go with an open system like Linux.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  33. Custom Linux OS by cablepokerface · · Score: 2

    As I disclaimer I'll say I like Microsoft, I develop mostly in VS. I even like Windows 8, God forbid. Don't hate me for it, it's an entirely different point than the one I am trying to make.

    What I am really very curious about though is why Windows is even relevant to the DoD. Not because it can't be, but because I find it hard to believe the DoD doesn't have their own division developing and maintaining a light-weight, multi-purpose, very secure Linux distro. It would seem to make so much more sense. They certainly have the budget for it, and then some. Then again, military-wise, I am a layman and there are probably lots of considerations for them to choose a proprietary US third party like MS

    1. Re:Custom Linux OS by PPH · · Score: 1

      Because Pentagon procurement is all about sending as much business as possible to suppliers who will in turn make large contributions to members of legislative DoD oversight committees.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Custom Linux OS by silviuc · · Score: 1

      Because it is not a question of tehcnical merits of a solution over another but of politics and politicians. These guys love MS because they send lots of money their way so they give taxpayers money love in return.

  34. Windows for Warships by PPH · · Score: 1

    Got all those nasty bugs ironed out? Like the divide by zero bug that locked up the USS Yorktown helm?

    No, Not yet.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Windows for Warships by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Once they update to "Warship Windows RT"... it'll solve ALL their problems... provided they update the entire ship to touchscreen technology. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  35. Its a great bargain for both sides long term by Dun+Kick+The+Noob · · Score: 2

    Think about it, both sides stand to gain. Microsoft gains a lot by getting thinking/bugs sorted out. Don't think developers and PMs will ignore disgruntled soldiers and windows will learn a lot about robustness and usability. Army gets faster in developing software. Say what you will, microsoft makes hard to achieve features easily accessible. I stress accessible only.

  36. Sharepoint by atrus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Sharepoint? Does anyone actually like SharePoint?

    1. Re:Sharepoint by B5Fan · · Score: 2

      Seriously, Sharepoint? Does anyone actually like SharePoint?

      Yes, Microsoft. It locks people into Office, which locks them into Windows, which is the only thing keeping Microsoft from a steep downward spiral.
      Like a 747 in the air and without working engines, but in a powerful updraft.

      --
      Borg:"Lawsuits are irrelevant. GPL3 is irrelevant. DRM is good. We understand security... Alert! MS are assimilating us!
  37. Modernize the software those organizations use by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    They should first modernize their thoughts. There are alternatives to Microsoft.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Modernize the software those organizations use by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Whoever railroaded this deal through the bureaucracy is probably going to get promoted.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  38. Another nail by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    This is another nail in the coffin of the American Empire. Seriously... think about it.

  39. Re:Too late by turbidostato · · Score: 3, Informative

    "When youre dealing with a $600 million contract, I have a feeling the customer gets pretty much whatever they want."

    As in "absolutly nothing"?
    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/11/15/0119212/us-air-force-scraps-erp-project-after-1-billion-spent

  40. If ANY project need an Agile approach . . . by Btrot69 · · Score: 1

    For how many YEARS have we KNOWN that this sort of "big master plan to do everything, everywhere" is doomed? Isn't this a basic lesson of Agile/Extreme Programming that all CS students (and software project managers) should now know?

  41. Re:and how well will that work?? GOOD IDEA TOO by ne0n · · Score: 1

    There's no doubt this MS mobility tie-in will not end in spectacular failure + the butt of many /. jokes to come.
    And your sly sarcasm has not gone unnoticed either ;) I too tell my in-laws that their new "pirated Windows 8" AKA Mint 14 is just like Win7 only using fewer resources *wink nudge* Oh, and any older programs that don't run anymore are being blocked for viruses.

    --
    $ :(){ :|:& };:
  42. Commence One-Liners by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    US Military + Microsoft = New meaning of "Blue Screen Of Death"

    Do computer viruses count as biological weapons? If so, international treaties may be in jeopardy.

    If you thought the US Defense Department was over budget and behind schedule before, just wait until full Microsoft integration is complete.

    I hope the passwords to the nukes are more secure than Windows passwords.

    etc, etc....

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  43. Re:Has anyone.. by fostware · · Score: 1

    However Walmart iPads fly just fine. We have video proof...

    --
    "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  44. Military + Microsoft by ruir · · Score: 1

    Now I know why Military Intelligence is an oxymoron. Are this contracts the counterpart of MS giving them backdoors to spy on foreign countries?

  45. Notice the "mobile" approach by ruir · · Score: 1

    Since nobody cares a shit about windows mobile, they will be inflating the numbers of customers at the expense of the tax payer's money? sweet...

  46. VPN by itsphilip · · Score: 1

    Does this mean Windows Phone will actually support VPN?

  47. The World Rejoices by marienf · · Score: 1

    Anything that substantially weakens the armies of the United States of Aggression must be cause for great rejoicing in much of the world. I would almost start to like Microsoft.. almost..

  48. Re:microsoft? modern? by mrvan · · Score: 1

    As opposed to the post-internet operating systems like... Android and iOS? Really?

  49. Military + Microsoft Products by stenvar · · Score: 1

    This video shows how the military deals with Microsoft products:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz4EKv9HmsM

  50. I think you mean SOME Surface devices by B5Fan · · Score: 1

    These will be the first Surfaces actually sold (as opposed to shipped and in warehouses).
    Eventually, when the paperwork is signed off in a few years.

    --
    Borg:"Lawsuits are irrelevant. GPL3 is irrelevant. DRM is good. We understand security... Alert! MS are assimilating us!
  51. Why not? by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Isn't it somewhat fitting that the military of the world's biggest corporatocracy, the United States, runs proprietary software of the world's biggest software corporation? They'll finally be just eating their own dog food. Of course, that would be a delightful and easy target to hack from all around the world.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  52. Re:1998 called ... by pscottdv · · Score: 1

    Yeah! I haven't had to deal with a BSOD since... let me think... Oh yeah, it was yesterday.

    On a Windows 7 laptop.

    Due to a registry problem.

    Just like it always is.

    Since Windows 95.

    --

    this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

  53. The day I moved my office off base.... by vandamme · · Score: 1

    ...and installed LinuxMint on my 6 year old desktop that replaced a 3 year old machine with all the Microsoft/DoDParanoid crap, was the best day of my career. No windows, no Gates, I was free.....like Munich.
    Really, the USAF developed their own super-secure distro. Why not use it? And save $617M? Or did some procurement officer get an XBox under their Christmas tree?