Slashdot Mirror


Condensation On Your Beer != Good

An anonymous reader writes "Turns out that condensation on your favorite chilled beverage is a bad thing for keeping it cold. Two researchers conducted an experiment in their bathroom proving that condensation can raise the temperature of your beer by nine degrees!"

194 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. wait, will wiping off help? by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By the time there's any condensate to wipe off the glass, hasn't the damage (i.e. heat from condensation) already been done? That's what warms the glass and its contents, not the water remaining on the side. So wiping it off won't prevent the warming.

    1. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by pchasco · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the most part, but I expect the droplets of water increase the surface area of your cold beer container, thereby accelerating the warming process.

    2. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by XiaoMing · · Score: 3, Informative

      By the time there's any condensate to wipe off the glass, hasn't the damage (i.e. heat from condensation) already been done? That's what warms the glass and its contents, not the water remaining on the side. So wiping it off won't prevent the warming.

      What you said is correct: wiping will not help, as the condensation process is what causes the heating. The most telling bit comes from TFA:

      “Probably the most important thing a beer koozie does is not simply insulate the can, but keep condensation from forming on the outside of it,” said Dale Durran, a UW professor of atmospheric sciences.

      So either we start seeing stein-shaped koozies at our local dive bar... or nothing will really change from this "finding".

    3. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By the time there's any condensation, it should have been drank already!

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 1

      They increase the surface area, but depending on their shape increase the volume of water that would also need to be warmed if the glass and therefore its contents were also to be.

    5. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      I'd think wiping it off would accelerate the warming - it allows for new condensation to form, bringing the temperature between the beer and the atmosphere closer to equal. It's like hugely accelerating the evaporation of the condensation.

      Not surprised that condensation warms the beer (duh!) but I'm surprised how great the effect is.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're drinking beer out of a can?? Well I guess that makes since. You have to keep the standard mainstream American beer very cold so you can't taste it.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    7. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most beer shouldn't be ice cold to begin with. Good beer at least. I agree with your sentiments about the mass market fizzy piss they call beer though.

    8. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by CanadianRealist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're right. Water has a high heat of vaporization. The amount of energy required to vaporize a given amount of water is close to 5 times the amount of energy that would be required to heat that same amount of water from 0 C to 100 C.

      So think of it as being a bit like taking the amount of water in the condensate, heating that to 500 C* and adding it to your beer. (* heating to that temperature without vaporizing)

    9. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      By the time there's any condensate to wipe off the glass, hasn't the damage (i.e. heat from condensation) already been done?

      Wiping probably makes it worse - expose fresh cold glass to the air for more condensate.
      .

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your reflexive disdain is outdated. Lots of craft brewers are going to cans, at least here in Colorado. Much easier to take camping, lighter, probably cheaper and just as easy to recycle. Also, unlike even brown glass, and much better than pale glass, a can won't let *any* light through, so the beer is less likely to skunk.

    11. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Craft and imported beer comes in cans these days.
      Much safer to drink in my pool than glass bottles.

    12. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is true. You will taste much more of the beer when you drink it slightly warmer. Also the reason why the supermarket bulk beer contains phrases such as "drink ice cold!!" -- you can't taste how crappy it is.

    13. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The new cans are pretty decent (the lined ones).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    14. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      It will But not for the reason you think. People who actually drink beer, and understand it will know that a cold beer is actually a bad for the taste. The colder the beer is, the less you will taste it. The idea that you should get beer super chilled (as opposed to just a bit cool in the fridge) is mostly propagated by the makers of such swill as Budd and Coors. They actively don't want you to taste their beer (just drink it), and hence try and convince everyone that super cold beer is wonderful.

    15. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      So either we start seeing stein-shaped koozies at our local dive bar... or nothing will really change from this "finding".

      At least, just drink from a smaller glass. That way, you can finish it sooner and replenish it from the original low-temperature supply. How this works out from a price perspective is between you and the bartender.

    16. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Seems to me wiping it will do more harm than good. In Africa, where refrigerators were scarce, we would put damp cloth on our beer bottles. The evaporation of the water chilled the beer pretty nicely.

      --
      Gently reply
    17. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Tx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every country has its fair share of fizzy piss lager, but credit where credit is due, I was just reading about how American craft beers have inspired British brewers in recent times, so I think the days of scoffing at US beer should be over.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    18. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by Ant2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the time it has taken you guys to debate this, I drank three beers. Fast enough that there was no time for condensation to take place.

      But carry on with your theories. I salute you.

    19. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      American craft beers are also quite influential in Scandinavia, among both beer drinkers and as an influence on the local brewing scene. Brooklyn Brewery is popular enough that they're opening a brewery in Stockholm to fill local demand without having to ship the beer.

    20. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually what I think is happening is probably the opposite of evaporative cooling. When you sweat for example, it makes you cold because as the water molecules are evaporating into a gas, it takes heat energy with it.

      Now condensation on the other hand results in the opposite. The heat from the water molecule is then put into the system (i.e. the glass of beer) so the water molecule sticks to it because it no longer has the energy it needed to remain in its gas form.

      In which case, wiping the condensation off doesn't reduce the temperature. In fact, it might actually be counterproductive because that water is no longer there to evaporate again, resulting in the cooling effect.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    21. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, speaking as a British beer snob who's travelled the US coast-to-coast, there are astonishingly good craft beers in shops throughout the US. They tend towards the very hoppy pale ale, which I absolutely love, and they have inspired more of that kind of beer in the UK.

      However, Bud Lite, PBR etc. are definitely blander than any of the mainstream British/European lagers served in British pubs.

    22. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by alfredo · · Score: 2

      A local craft brewer, http://www.westsixth.com/ has gone to cans for the brews. I still like my long necks because they can be capped for the next day if needed.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    23. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by kernelistic · · Score: 2

      I almost choked on my M&M's! Sir, I salute you for making my day!

    24. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      However, the staple american beers are still crap piss lagers.

      Outside of major cities, you still find many bars where the options are "Bud, Bud Light, and Miller", to quote one bartender that I ran into a few years back (A friedn and I, we walked in to grab a beer and use the bathroom, he saw us on our way to the bathroom first and commented that it was for customers only, we planned to have a drink anyway so we asked what they had, after he answered we looked at eachother and walked out)

      There is a reason that you find 4 & 6 packs of good beer, and 30 racks of piss lager. You can find good beer here, but, if you really were going to insist on stereotyping american beer drinking, PBR is closer to a realistic stereotype than craft beers.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    25. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some people like to savor the things they eat/drink.

      However, I did lol.

    26. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your reflexive disdain is outdated. Lots of craft brewers are going to cans, at least here in Colorado. Much easier to take camping, lighter, probably cheaper and just as easy to recycle. Also, unlike even brown glass, and much better than pale glass, a can won't let *any* light through, so the beer is less likely to skunk.

      Think of a can as a small hand held keg. No real difference in the storage container other than size.

      Of course the storage conditions have an affect so be careful where you buy your beer. Kegs stay in a cool location. Cans sometimes are kept cool and sometimes are 'stored' in rather warm conditions.

    27. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am curious why you feel glass bottles are superior to cans, because right now, you're coming across as an audiophile who ignores all evidence that their $1000 cable is no better than a coat hanger.

    28. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Demonantis · · Score: 2

      I use the trick every time I have a batch of homebrew with a funny taste. The reason macro brew tastes so bland is that they use a bunch of corn and rice instead of barley to save money.

    29. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Zod000 · · Score: 2

      I can't speak for the other poster, but as a counter example, many finer ales are bottles conditioned and I simply do not see how they could ever exist as canned beer.

      --
      People seem much brighter once you light them on fire.
    30. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      I'm not arguing at all about the low quality of the majority of macrobrews, and I also don't argue that the majority of American beers sold are cheap.

      My point was that you can't assume just based on the form factor that what's inside is one of those cheap macrobrews. One reason they don't sell a 30-pack of Fat Tire in cans is because it would retail at around $40, and few people want to shell that out at once. Also, it's got a higher alcohol content, so maybe you don't need to drink quite as many in a given night to have the same amount of fun.

    31. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to break this to you, but unless you are 100 years old, ANY beer you have ever drunk has been from a lined can.

      METHOD OF LINING THE INSIDE OF CANS (Google Patents, 1933)

      The new cans are pretty decent (the lined ones).

    32. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I don't really agree. There are a *lot* of beer snobs/connoisseurs who would consider, say, New Belgium "good" rather than merely "good for camping." I do share your love for tasty European beers, (though by the time they make it here half of them are skunked or otherwise aged and not nearly as enjoyable as they would be in Europe--I'm taking my chances when I buy an import), but some of the American canned stuff these days is on the same level of craft.

      If your argument is that all American beers are simply inferior to European beers, then I don't agree with you, but I understand why you wouldn't want them in a can, because that's a subset of you not wanting them under all circumstances.

      If your argument is there's good American stuff, but it's not available in cans, I'm going to repeat my statement that I think a good number of true craft breweries are going to cans, and you just might not have noticed yet.

      I do see some European stuff in cans, but most of that is geared toward the middle rather than high end of the market. Guinness, Murphy's, Stella, though I think maybe there's more of that now than there used to be.

    33. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      Oh, forgot to add. The local liquor store has two floor-to-ceiling sets of shelves where you can assemble your own mixed six-packs. I was surprised to notice the other day they'd reorganized and a full three shelves (out of 12 - 14 total) contained only cans, none of them macrobrews like Bud/Miller/Coors. All were craft brews.

    34. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good job. Mood lifted after the Florida story.

    35. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      you can't taste how pissy it is.

      It tastes the way piss smells. 'nuff said.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    36. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For god sakes man!
      Don't make fun of this.. This is some of the most important ground breaking research yet.. What if you have to go to the bathroom, or worse yet have to stop drinking for a few minutes to flourish details about your amazing worldly exploits to friends.. And yes that's been my same SIG for years now.

    37. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, speaking as a British beer snob who's travelled the US coast-to-coast, there are astonishingly good craft beers in shops throughout the US.

      Speaking as a science snob, the mass market American beers are some of the most impressive feats of industrial and chemical engineering today. When you talk to a craft brewer and ask them what makes their beer special, they'll tell about the effort, the love, and the hops. If you filter out the hippie bullshit, and if they have a clue, they'll patiently explain about their hops and the peculiarities of the soil it comes from. They'll also talk about their water. Next, go visit a distillery in the Scottish Highlands, and ask them what makes their product different from the distillery on the next hill. They will talk about their water. Every distiller will go on and on about the local water supply, and how there is no place else in the world where one could replicate that exact flavor.

      Now visit a macrobrewery. It's like stepping from a tiny server closet to a Google data center...total nerd spooge. These guys do serious engineering. They bottle all over the in the world, using water from hundreds of different hills, using hops from thousands of farms, and can make their product taste exactly the same, every time. You can fly all over the world, order one of these "crap lagers", and get precisely what you asked for every single time. These companies manage that a billion times per day. If that doesn't impress the holy fuck out of you, then engineering probably isn't for you.

      Also, a question for the beer snobs out there: if the difference between a crap beer and a good beer is as great as you claim, why don't I see quality beers selling for $100+ at restaurants and liquor stores. It's easy to find places stocking $5 wine and $500 wine, $5 whiskey and $500 whiskey. Where's the all the good beer that could actually command a real premium price? Why does the free market seem to think premium beer is only worth the same markup as premium toilet paper? Is beer snobbery really just more about the snobbery than the beer?

    38. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even easier. If you don't drink BMC (Bud/Miller/Coors), there's no need to keep it so damn cold to kill the taste.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    39. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Think of a can as a small hand held keg. No real difference in the storage container other than size.

      The big difference is not just the size, but the surface area to volume ratio. A can ~1/5th the linear size of a keg will have 5x more surface area relative to the liquid, so any wall interaction effects will be ~5x stronger. Not to say that even 5x of pretty much nothing particularly adds up to a problem.

    40. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because they aren't as expensive to make and reasonably easily replicated by someone else who will sell it cheaper?

      Take your $500 bottle of scotch. It's probably aged for 25 or 30 years. So if I decided to make a competitor it would take me 25 years from when I started to bring it to market. And on every one of those 25 years I'd have to decide "I won't sell it all this year and make some money to pay the bills, I'll instead age it some more".

      Though I suspect the real answer is that wine and whiskey snobbery are off the charts. A $500 bottle of wine is quite possibly nicer than a $25 bottle of wine - it's not $475 nicer though. Wine just happens to be a luxury good that people use to show off wealth and hence the wealthy will spend a lot of money on it just so that everyone knows they have a lot of money. Beer doesn't have that status and hence people won't pay such ridiculous sums for it.

      That doesn't mean that "premium" beer isn't much better than "non-premium" beer. In fact it's a great thing for people who happen to like "premium" beers.

    41. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Wow, someone discoverd an old old well documented thermodynamic principal of why adding heat to boiling water does not railse it's temperature. Condensation returns the heat used in eveporation. Nice to see physics still can be verified from time to time.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    42. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by macraig · · Score: 1

      Heads up, folks, here come the beer fanbois. They're worse than the Apple ones!

    43. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 1

      When you're trying to be snarky and dismissive, you might want to enable your spell checker.

    44. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Take your $500 bottle of scotch. It's probably aged for 25 or 30 years. So if I decided to make a competitor it would take me 25 years from when I started to bring it to market. And on every one of those 25 years I'd have to decide "I won't sell it all this year and make some money to pay the bills, I'll instead age it some more".

      Not entirely true.

      That 25 or 30 years has to be spent in the cask, once the scotch is bottled it really doesn't "age" any more, at least not in the sense of "Aged 25 years".

      Further, the longer you leave it in the cask, the less of it exists; approximately 10% of the cask is lost to evaporation through the cask annually. Further the oak itself can seep into the mix, causing some of the whiskey to go bad. Sometimes even the entire cask can have been lost.

      As such, for that $500 bottle of scotch, you're paying for the initial cost of making the barrel of scotch (cask, ingredients, etc), part of the rent/land-tax/whatever for the 25 years, and the % which had to be discarded as/after it aged.

      Barrel-Aging

    45. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      How is that "not entirely true", given it's exactly what I said? (aside from not going into the pretty much irrelevant to the point details of the aging process).

    46. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The warm water in the air condensates on the container, and warms up over time. Their is no instant where water suddenly appears and releases all of its heat.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    47. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      And, like, did anybody even think it was good...?

      --
      No sig today...
    48. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      They bottle all over the in the world, using water from hundreds of different hills, using hops from thousands of farms, and can make their product taste exactly the same, every time. You can fly all over the world, order one of these "crap lagers", and get precisely what you asked for every single time.

      Because no taste is not all that hard to replicate -bazinga! ;-p

      And because also, if you distill the water first, you pretty much have pure hydrogen dioxide, without the other minerals and whatnot, so you level the playing field for the most part.
      All this says to me is that their beer is overly filtered and processed, not unlike individually wrapped slices of Kraft cheese, which tend to feel and taste a little like sweet plastic .. and despite being made with milk from thousands of different cows, always tastes the same.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    49. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the time it has taken you guys to debate this, I drank three beers. Fast enough that there was no time for condensation to take place. But carry on with your theories. I salute you.

      They debated for 20 minutes and you posted at 11 AM on a Thursday.
      Google: +rehab +<your zipcode>

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    50. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      If that doesn't impress the holy fuck out of you, then engineering probably isn't for you.

      There's no arguing there's some serious *science* that goes into the precision and consistency of a macrobrew. But there's a difference between appreciating the engineering and enjoying a flavor.

      I've paid $25 for a bottle of beer. I think I've heard of people paying $50 for limited editions. That's probably a factor of 50 - 100 over the cheapest stuff, and in line with the examples you cited. Now you won't find that in restaurants very much, true, but I think the fancy beer market just goes on in other arenas. Even if the range is half or a quarter that of whiskey or wine, I think the required aging in those markets explains the rest of the difference. Beer rarely needs more than a few months of time invested, at most a handful of years in the extreme cases.

    51. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Because no taste is not all that hard to replicate -bazinga! ;-p

      so says the kid that has never brewed. preventing contaminants frmo fouling the batch is 99% of the work. doing that in vats the size of wisconsin is inconcievable.

      That's an interesting set of unfounded assumptions you've made about me. I'm neither a kid, nor someone who has never brewed. I'm quite familiar with brewing, having made several batches of mead. I'm well aware of the importance of sanitization. A little Star San goes a long way. I think newbs tend to see it as more critical than it really is though. Not all strains of yeast are that vulnerable. I don't see what's so inconceivable about doing this in large vat though, especially with the industrial budget available to the big brewers.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    52. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      There are limited run craft brews that get up to the $100-200 range per bottle.

      I several times a year buy $10-15 bottles of beer.

      I think you haven't done your market research very well.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    53. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Expensive wine takes ages to age, and it's rare. It's not necessarily fantastic compared to more reasonably priced wine. Same with whisky. Beer? Yeah, I suppose you could hand-select your grains and hops, and use your private limited supply well water ... but, as you say, water chemistry for brewing is pretty straight forward science (and common knowledge even among homebrewers, so I suppose there's nerd spooge in your average craft beer as well), so it's not like you can't get identical but more consistent results with reverse osmosis and a handful of mineral salts.

      The reason why beer snobs dislike your Bud is because it doesn't taste much like all. It's designed primarily to be inoffensive. You might as well ask why music snobs prefer Arnold Schönberg to Justin Timberlake, when the latter has had contributions from market research and advanced statistics to make music that's perfectly acceptable to a much larger share of the market.

      Of course, you're also full of shit when talking about craft brewers. Hardly any of them know anything about the soil their hops come from (they source them from the same farms that grow for the macros), and if you hear much hippie bullshit, you're most likely talking to their PR guy. Brewing is geeky stuff, the big guys just have bigger toys.

    54. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by period3 · · Score: 1

      ?? I always drink beer out of the can. They're much more convenient than bottles (don't break), and there are many many good beers available in cans. I've never seen or tasted any evidence that canned beer is worse than bottled.

    55. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by period3 · · Score: 2

      The taste isn't diminished THAT much by cold unless you're serving it ice cold. (colder than fridge temperature).

      You may taste more of warm beer, but for some (including me) this is outweighed by the fact that it's warm. I find near room-temperature drinks (or food) of any kind pretty gross. It feels like drinking from a still swamp. Ugh. It's got nothing to do with the taste.

      The same observation about 'warm' beer can probably be made about anything. Probably room-temperature sorbet has more taste than frozen sorbet, but wtf wants to eat that?

      In summary, eating/drinking is enjoyable not merely because of "taste", but also because of touch (texture) and temperature.

    56. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I fully understand that. The opportunity cost of an old favorite versus a tempting new unknown is always a tough call. Speaking of four-packs, the Unibroue stuff (particularly Trois Pistoles and Fin Du Monde) are among my favorites of all time. If you like Belgian style and haven't tried them, they're worth a shot.

    57. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      So either we start seeing stein-shaped koozies at our local dive bar... or nothing will really change from this "finding".

      Bodum, the French press people, have a line of double-walled glasses that would seem to be just the thing for avoiding condensation. They even have some they call beer glasses, though, sadly, they only hold 13 oz. They also appear to have a reputation for being incredibly fragile. And rather expensive. Probably not the thing for the local dive bar. Might work at home though.

    58. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The can may spoil it for you, but "skunk" is actually a technical term. It's a chemical process where some of the hop chemicals react with sunlight and convert into something else which literally provides a slightly skunky smell. If you want a good reference, Corona is a classic case of a heavily skunked beer. (I think that's why a lot of people drink it with the lime, to cover up the smell.) It's also part of the Mexican lager standard style - in their case they expose the beer to a burst of ultraviolet light during production specifically to create the effect, and can get away with clear bottles because additional skunking won't make much difference.

      Miller, on the other hand, created a variation of the hop chemical which provides bitterness but doesn't react to light. That's how they can get away with clear bottles for one of their lines of beer - it won't skunk no matter what.

    59. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Well you are correct that there are many good beers sold in cans (Maui brewing and 21st Amendment Brewery come to mind, and New Belgium has some varieties in cans) They are not common, however, and the vast majority of good beers (even decent ones) only come in bottles. Not to mention that often canned beer comes in cans lined with BPA.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    60. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      The new cans are pretty decent (the lined ones).

      You mean the ones lined with BPA?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    61. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Meeni · · Score: 1

      You just don't know about it. I've been to many places that sell and thrive on expensive beers. Actually, in Seattle, this place shaped like a cathedral in Pitts, the Academie de la Biere in Paris, don't even speak about Belgium beers, they are expensive and widely available (not speaking of Kriek here, more delirium tremens, and other high gravity types).

      There is a market, it is very alive. You just do not know about it.

    62. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      And because also, if you distill the water first, you pretty much have pure hydrogen dioxide

      Ummm, I'd think very carefully about drinking that...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    63. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by nebular · · Score: 2

      There are $500 bottles of beer, they're just rare. Actually that's the reason they're $500.

      Expensive wines are expensive for two reasons: They're very good wines and they're rare. Only so many bottles can be made in a particular year and so they are sought after when they're good. So the price goes up.
      Beer doesn't last as long, you can't have fifty year old vintages of a beer. A fifty year old oak keg of beer will have some nasty swill in it rather than anything you'd want to drink.

      Since beer goes bad, you don't have the rarity. So the really expensive beer are the batches from monasteries and other limited run breweries that are known for their high quality.

    64. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm curious and ignorant. What does 'bottle conditioned' mean, how does it change the beer and why wouldn't 'can conditioned' do exactly the same?

      I mean, oak casks and twenty years definitely does have an effect on whiskey, but another four years conditioning in a bottle doesn't. Is beer different?

    65. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      Bottle conditioning just means letting the final bit of fermentation occur in the bottle, which carbonates it naturally. Homebrewers rely on this because they don't have ways to inject CO2 into the system. Some traditional breweries use this method still, mostly smaller or older operations, though there are other exceptions. I'm not really aware of any significant changes in the character of the beer based on bottle conditioning other than it does leave a bit of yeast behind as sediment in the bottle. Many drinkers find this mostly a detriment - you're leaving that last bit behind or getting a cloudier/yeastier beer if you pour it all out. It may be appealing to some, or in the case of some wheats or strongly flavored yeasts provide a little extra to the experience. I'm not sure if that's what Zod was talking about, or if he just meant that many of the places which still bottle condition have what he considers to be better beers in general.

    66. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok - yeah, I'm familiar with that aspect, letting fermentation complete in the bottle.

      I'm still not sure why that might be impossible in a can - with the added bonus that it's easy to fit a filter to the can that catches the sediment as you pour.

    67. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by julesh · · Score: 1

      The main objections would be practical -- the neck of the bottle can be used to catch sediment while you're pouring and because you can see it you know when to stop pouring. Your filter idea may work, but I'd be concerned about the filter affecting the taste (it would almost certainly pull CO2 out of solution at the very least).

    68. Re: wait, will wiping off help? by StephanieK · · Score: 1

      LOL. Yes, carpe diem seems to be a more suitable approach.

    69. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      go visit a distillery in the Scottish Highlands, and ask them what makes their product different from the distillery on the next hill. They will talk about their water. Every distiller will go on and on about the local water supply, and how there is no place else in the world where one could replicate that exact flavor.

      The honest ones talk about what the ageing barrels were used for before they put whisky in them e.g. port, wine, sherry etc, how many times they reuse the barrel and if they blowtorch the inside to get some charcoal to improve the colour.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    70. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Good beer can come out of a can. These guys in Michigan make some great beer and their stuff comes in cans.

      http://www.breweryvivant.com/index.php/the-beer/the-cans/

    71. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      You can age beer, too. Probably not 50 years, but 10-20 is possible.

      http://zythophile.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/the-lost-art-of-extreme-aged-cask-ale/

      Stone did a Vertical Epic Ale that was released on 02.02.02, 03.03.03 ... up to 12.12.12 and meant to be enjoyed together on the last release (if you could wait).

      http://www.stonebrewing.com/verticalepic/#4

    72. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by dwsanborn · · Score: 1

      When it comes to my home brew, ice cold completely diminishes the hops. Now, basement temp (~58-65 degrees) is perfect. I just keep it in a cool closet in my apartment. That being said, I prefer pretty heavily hopped beers, so there's that. I agree with the majority here, I won't even drink the macro crap unless I'm on my annual golf trip and trying to keep up with the boys. At that point, the koozie is a necessity. The logic seems pretty sound...keep the condensation from forming the best you can, and you have no issues. If the beer is worth pouring into a mug, it shouldn't be served that cold in my opinion. Unfortunately, we're not typically given a choice on serving method in a bar.

    73. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      All of those $500 wines or $500 whiskeys are aged. It's less a matter of quality and more of rarity. And for the most part, those bottles are not worth what you're paying for. If you know what you're doing you can find a $80 bottle of whiskey that tastes as good as the $500, or a $40 bottle of wine that tastes as good as the $500. Most wines don't actually benefit by aging much if at all, and unless you have an incredibly well-developed palate you probably can't taste the difference between a good wine and an excellent one.

      Beer, by its nature, is more ephemeral than wine or spirits. The best beer you'll ever have is fresh from the barrel at a good brewery, not stuck in somebody's cellar for 30 years.

    74. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'll be damned, this article says It's closer to 50 years, but still.

      It's not the can, It's the shifty beer in it that makes them shitty. That and that small run canning became more cost effective (according to the local breweries here).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    75. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      WTF? Last time I checked the commodities market, barley was $100/ton and corn was $400/ton.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    76. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      This is so weird to be reading today... yesterday I was writing along on my SF epic, and decided to throw a side character into a vat of skunky beer. So I had to go research exactly what it was. Had an interesting hour or so reading about the qualities of different containers and hops.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    77. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by lefin1 · · Score: 1

      The condensation means it's getting warm. You better hurry!

    78. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by treethinker5823 · · Score: 1

      Nobody badmouthing American Schudwiler beers bothers to observe that it's the climate. Much as I would rather be sitting in a nice 60-degree English summer afternoon drinking a real ale, American summers are much hotter, and a nice cold lawnmower beer is what you want to be drinking when it's hot enough that the act of raising a glass to your lips breaks a sweat.

    79. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      two row or six row barley?

      and feed corn or foodgrade corn?

      if you're buying corn, the US goobermint will pay for you.

    80. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      i was at a brew workshop last year in Italy where the craft brewer was praising the American microbrew renaissance.

    81. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      late-and-heavy hopping is getting a bit too faddish. it can get like cold, too-strong green tea with it's astringency.

      sometimes i grab a coopers and just fucking relish the simplicity of it.

    82. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      the oak is MEANT to seep into the whisky...

      the charred inside of the cask scrubs the heavier alcohols through adsorption (it's basically activiated carbon filtering), and the layers underneath the char dissolve into the mix and give it colour and flavour.

      too old can be as bad as too young. take 25yo Ron Zacapa - it's beautiful, but i can't for the life of me taste any alcohol in it.

    83. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      ever hear of cleanskins?

      it's how wineries keep the price of their premium wines high. if they produce too much, they plop it into generic labelled bottles and sell it at a small profit, so they can keep their top-of-the-line label scarce and exclusive and expensive.

      if there's a bumper crop one year, i say buy up on cleanskins of that vintage. you can never be sure if you're getting the good stuff, but you probably will.

    84. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      you excluded the Belgium he mentioned. that's 11 million people... gotta be a market in that (unless they're ALL on the supply side...).

    85. Re:wait, will wiping off help? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      That depends on the beer. While 25 or 30 years would be extreme, a high gravity barleywine for example can benefit from five or ten years of aging. It will become a lot more port or sherry-like. I have bottles of a very strong barleywine I made about 12 years ago and it's still incredible. It's changed quite a bit but it is fantastic. I don't know what it would be like after a couple of decades but I'm pretty sure it will still be drinkable. Sealing the caps with wax helps as it keeps oxygen from creeping in. Oxidation is the primary reason why older bottles of beer taste bad.

  2. Just in time for cinco de mayo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now how about an experiment about the optimal water quantity for a wet t-shirt contest? Something about capillary action certainly has to be discovered...

    1. Re:Just in time for cinco de mayo by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now how about an experiment about the optimal water quantity for a wet t-shirt contest? Something about capillary action certainly has to be discovered...

      I'd rather be involved in the next 15-year study to confirm the latest findings on saggy breasts.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:Just in time for cinco de mayo by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      Now how about an experiment about the optimal water quantity for a wet t-shirt contest? Something about capillary action certainly has to be discovered...

      I'd rather be involved in the next 15-year study to confirm the latest findings on saggy breasts.

      As a study subject?

  3. Localized Warming! by paysonwelch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Save the ales!

    1. Re:Localized Warming! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      I sense another Star Trek movie. Put on your hippie robe Spock, we're headed for Earth before a giant alien beer gets there and finds all its children warm and flat.

    2. Re:Localized Warming! by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried to start that movement, but soon everyone was at lagerheads.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  4. Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My beer is never in the glass long enough to form condensation.

  5. the bathroom is where you return your rented beer by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> Two researchers conducted an experiment in their bathroom

    A lot of my stories that end with "and then we were both grounded for a month" start that way too.

  6. Fundamental thermodynamics by gentryx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phase transition from gaseous to liquid dissipates thermal energy. News at 18:00.

    --
    Computer simulation made easy -- LibGeoDecomp
    1. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by invid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      High school physics is now a surprise to people. I am sad.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    2. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      High school physics is now a surprise to people. I am sad.

      I quickly went to the comment section hoping to see this type of response. Seriously a) this is on Slashdot and b) you wouldn't hope this would be common knowledge -- especially for readers of Slashdot!?

    3. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up, it's not even surprising.

      If this is a new discovery for someone then it's really an indication of how bad education is in the western world.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is APPLIED SCIENCE

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    5. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is actually sad is how people try to find the most basic principle expressed in some research project and then assume that is the entity of the research so it can be dismissed as being high school level science. There is a big difference between determining that condensation simply releases heat and determining how much heat is released in a real world situation and showing that it is significant as opposed to contributing so little to the overall process to be ignorable.

      This might not be a shining example of cutting edge research, but the same mindset seems to be all too common around here regardless of the actual significance or quality of research. Some people seem too busy trying to be dismissive, saying the measurements of the Higgs boson was stupid because its existence had be theorized for some time, and would probably show disdain if they were around for the discovery of integrated circuits or the transistor because Boolean logic had already existed.

    6. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      A.K.A latent heat.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    7. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by 0bject · · Score: 1

      Cooling down from sweating has nothing to do with condensation. In fact its the opposite. The "cooling" effect is the result of evaporation of the sweat. The process of evaporation (liquid->gas) absorbs heat whereas the processes of condensation (gas->liquid) releases heat.

    8. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by invid · · Score: 1

      I know you're trying to cheer me up, but I'm still sad.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    9. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by pjabardo · · Score: 1

      The tide comes in, the tide goes out ...

    10. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      I especially like how they threw a "!=" into the headline. It's the hip thing to do. Oh, Slashdotters will find that charming!

      Of course, the more pedantic among us will twitch at the use of a logical operator as a copula. :)

      --
      /* No Comment */
    11. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Personally I would have used

    12. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 2

      To be fair this research was in the latest issue of Physics Today.

      --
      horror vacui
    13. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      And surely the point is anyone who got a D- in science would know that if evaporation cools things down, then condensation must warm things up.

    14. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think we covered heat of vaporization in grade ten or so. Quantitatively.

    15. Re:Fundamental thermodynamics by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your point, the fact that you're applying it to this story makes me sad.

      Slashdot is full of cynical gits who think they know more than they do. But this story seems to be about something trivial enough that someone with a high school education should be able to calculate the result on the back of a napkin with no problems. It's also not confirming theory... that particular theory has been confirmed a LOT, including regularly in high school science classrooms.

      Now, the original article seems to be a tongue in cheek light science story in Physics Today. But the tongue in cheekness got lost somewhere between the original experiment and the Slashdot summary. Your post suggests you missed it entirely and think the result is in some way important.

  7. Incredible by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

    That's incredible.
    They should file a patent in order to protect their original research.
    They would get billions from fridge/heat pump/cooling tower manufacturers or anybody who sweats!

  8. Nine degrees scared me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note to international readers: That is 9 degrees Fahrenheit. It's not as bad news for the summer days as it looks!

    1. Re:Nine degrees scared me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's 5K for the math impaired.

  9. I just have so say by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    Nice submission. News for Nerds, Stuff That Matters indeed.

  10. Better living with Science! by drjoe1e6 · · Score: 1

    Definitely news for nerds here! Science that we can apply to our everyday lives, making our day just a little bit better. And it's an interesting factoid for bar conversations.

    --
    Lose = not win ...... Loose = not tight
    1. Re:Better living with Science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It works both ways. If you take something that is already wet with condensation and heat it up until the water evaporates, the evaporation is cooling it down. Either way - condensation or evaporation - it's a case of the system resisting whatever pressure is being applied to it. Le Chatelier's principle in action (although this is not its original context of chemical equilibrium, it's still surprisingly applicable in many situations).

  11. All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The condensation pays a latent heat penalty, warming the beer when the beer is super cold. But conversely the evaporation pays back the latent heat penalty at some higher temperature. Where the equilibrium point is I'm not sure.

    But there is an easy solution to this problem: mist the outside of your beer glass with cold water. This will tie up all the condensation nucleation sites without paying the latent heat penalty.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by olsmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      But there is an easy solution to this problem: mist the outside of your beer glass with cold water.

      Seriously? Sure, and assuming a spherical cow....

    2. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or you could, you know, just drink it before it's old enough to buy its own beer.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    3. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by quist · · Score: 3, Informative

      the equilibrium point will be roughly at the dew_pt or wet_bulb_temp of the ambient environment. The wet_bulb_temp will approach ambient temp as the % humidity rises, hence, the quick-warming pitchers in the average crowded college watering hole.

    4. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by apraetor · · Score: 2

      Latent heat added to beer during condensation = latent heat lost to evaporation of the condensate subsequent to the beer warming to ambient. Basically the condensation heats the beer, then once it's at ambient temperature it starts evaporating, with heat flow from the environment making up for the latent heat energy loss. So water vapor heats the beer quickly, then evaporates slowly enough as to be useless for cooling the beer.

    5. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of making glass with a coating of hydrophobic nano-particle so that watter would not condense on the glass in the first place.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    6. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Don't file it there, more water will condense on to the water that's already there. It's still a first world problem.

    7. Re:All this assumes super cold beer is desirable by Cederic · · Score: 1

      But there is an easy solution to this problem

      Yes. Drink proper fucking beer.

  12. Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 5, Informative

    You chill beverage to hide the unpleasant flavors. Good beer is best served just at or slightly below room temp. Keep it in a cool, dark place - it's ready when you are. Colonials ::sigh::

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
    1. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by DougOtto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That advice works fine in England where room temperature is 55F but no so much in the desert where I live.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    2. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No matter where you live beer served near freezing is only done to cover up the fact that is it garbage.

      Get a second fridge set that bad boy to 45F-50F, keep your beer in it.

    3. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That depends on the type of the beer.

      http://www.ratebeer.com/Story.asp?StoryID=479

    4. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by Inda · · Score: 1

      We don't drink Stella for the flavour.

      Warm beer on a hot summer's day? Um, yeah, that sounds soooo appetising.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by I_Wrote_This · · Score: 1

      It's actually cellar temperature rather than room temperature. Dig a big hole in the ground (or use a nearby cave). Unlike room temperature, this tends to stay the same temperature all year round (without the need for heating or air-conditioning).

    6. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Stella is overpriced crap, for the same money you could buy good beer.
      2. No one said warm, celler temp is what you want.

    7. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Ignorant beer snobs are so amusing.

    8. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      You chill beverage to hide the unpleasant flavors. Good beer is best served just at or slightly below room temp. Keep it in a cool, dark place - it's ready when you are. Colonials ::sigh::

      Like wines, the customary serving temperature of various beers depends on the type. And personal preference. Stuffy Brits ::sigh::

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    9. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by Cloud+K · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, keep it in a cold dark place. England!

    10. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by DdJ · · Score: 1

      My favorite temperature for serving beer (that I'll tolerate drinking) is roughly the ambient temperature of a typical cellar in Ireland in the Spring and Autumn.

      Gee, I wonder why that is...

    11. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Mackeson's Triple Stout is great at room temp.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    12. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Some people like cold beverages because their country gets warm.

      But then you probably need sunlight to have actual warmth, so I can comprehend why a Brit might not comprehend that.

      --
      -Styopa
    13. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure when I chill water to drink on 40C summer days, hiding unpleasant flavors does not play any part in my reasons for doing so.

    14. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Your parents used to lock you in the cellar when they made whoopie?

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    15. Re:Beer that needs chilling is, uh, well... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      So you happily drink 36C beer when you go on a picnic and it's 38C out?

  13. Re:As I'm a teetotaler... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Not one shit was given...

    Feel free to repeat the experiment with chilled tap water, I guess, if that'll help

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  14. Yeah, and...? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

    Beer is certainly "stuff that matters." And the fact that condensation transfers heat to the surface of the glass may be "news" to some folks. But the number of "nerds" who didn't already know this must be quite small.

    OTOH, it's an excuse to talk about beer. Matter of fact, I'm having one right now. ;-)

    Cheers!

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    1. Re:Yeah, and...? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      OTOH, it's an excuse to talk about beer. Matter of fact, I'm having one right now. ;-)

      Well, what did you have? I just enjoyed a couple of cheap-ass Grafenwalder from Lidl, Finland.

    2. Re:Yeah, and...? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Taiwan Gold Medal on tap. Nothing special, really, but cheap and quite drinkable. And being locally produced, it's quite fresh, especially from the keg.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  15. Re:the bathroom is where you return your rented be by mcmonkey · · Score: 2

    >> Two researchers conducted an experiment in their bathroom

    A lot of my stories that end with "and then we were both grounded for a month" start that way too.

    I imagine a lot of stories that start that way end with "...and 9 months later, you were born!"

    (for fans of Sexy Loser)

    (for those who don't know, don't look it up at work)

  16. Chilling news ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... but, there's a solution at hand: Drink fast!

  17. Says who? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Most beer is served way too cold, since bars tend to keep everything at piss water lager temperature.

    Proper beers are better at celler temperatures instead of near to freezing. Anything that helps get a beer back up is fine by me. Most places I have to order two beers to start so I can let one warm while I drink the other.

    1. Re:Says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A man walks into a bar and orders three beers.

      The bartender brings him the three beers, and the man proceeds to alternately sip one, then the other, then the third, until they're gone.

      He then orders three more and the bartender says, "Sir, I know you like them cold, so you can start with one, and I'll bring you a fresh one as soon as you're low."

      The man says, "You don't understand. I have two brothers, one in Australia and one in the Ireland. We made a vow to each other that every Saturday night, we'd still drink together. So right now, my brothers have three beers, too, and we're drinking together."

      The bartender thinks it's a wonderful tradition, and every week he sets up the guy's three beers. Then one week, the man comes in and orders only two. He drinks them and then orders two more. The bartender says sadly, "Knowing your tradition, I'd just like to just say that I'm sorry you've lost a brother."

      The man replies, "Oh, my brothers are fine -- I just quit drinking."

  18. As a Belgian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I must share that there is something wrong with the beer when one has to drink it extremely cold.
    An Orval should be served between 12-14 degrees. That's insensitive Celcius degrees.
    Why not spending a couple of extra cents on quality ingredients to make a quality beer instead of blowing money on cooling?

    1. Re:As a Belgian by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason for this is very simple.
      The brewer does not pay for the cooling, the bar or customer does. This means they can continue to use cracked rice, cracked corn, the lowest grade of barley known to man and hops extract. When you are making a billion gallons of brew you can make a lot of profit by using animal feed instead of proper ingredients.

      Then you simply advertise the hell out of serving this garbage as cold as possible, which covers up the taste.

    2. Re:As a Belgian by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Why not spending a couple of extra cents on quality ingredients to make a quality beer instead of blowing money on cooling?

      Because that wouldn't be the American Megacorporate Way. Why spend more on product quality, when you could spend half as much on ubiquitous ad campaigns to redefine the country's understanding of what "beer" even is?

    3. Re:As a Belgian by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not spending a couple of extra cents on quality ingredients to make a quality beer instead of blowing money on cooling?

      Because that wouldn't be the American Megacorporate Way. Why spend more on product quality, when you could spend half as much on ubiquitous ad campaigns to redefine the country's understanding of what "beer" even is?

      WRT beer, what is this American Megacorporation to which you refer? AB InBev? Grupo Modello? SABMiller? Molson Coors? (I guess that last one's half-American, but not really "mega" compared to the first two.)

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:As a Belgian by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Becoming part of a globalized mega holding company, which doesn't actually give a shit for America, Americans, or the products you're making, but loves raking in money, is a hallowed part of the American Megacorporate Tradition.

    5. Re:As a Belgian by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Our American Megacorporate Overlords have been pushing shitty beer (and every other kind of quasi-food product) on Americans since well before consolidating into global holdings conglomerates.

    6. Re:As a Belgian by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      I'm not denying that the factories churning out American mass-produced food-substitute and beverage-substitute products aren't marvels of industrial engineering and process control. Unfortunately, not just in beer, but pretty much every food product, convenience for centralized mass production to meet corporate desires completely trumps every other aspect of quality. Products are designed for shelf life, easy transport, uniformity, cheap monoculture ingredients, minimum manufacturing cost --- not for taste, nutrition, ecological sustainability, craftsmanship, or variety.

    7. Re:As a Belgian by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Because it's hard to heat beer up to 12 degrees and keep it there without scalding it?

  19. So would that mean by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Leaving it in a salted ice medium in a cooler is bad for it too? It can get pretty wet that way.

  20. What do you call insulated beverage sleeves? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    While on a float trip in Arkansas many years ago, a friend in a bikini offered me a titty. Shock turned to disappointment when I learned that in parts of the South Central US, those foam beverage sleeves are known as "Tiddies" for the Texas-based manufacturer of such foam-rubber products. But my beer did stay colder longer, so it wasn't a total loss.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:What do you call insulated beverage sleeves? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      We call them 'beer condoms'. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:What do you call insulated beverage sleeves? by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      I think the generally accepted term is "Beer koozie." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_koozie

    3. Re:What do you call insulated beverage sleeves? by mynameiskhan · · Score: 1

      Of course I use can sleeves for my Coke Zero - just another drink but unhealthier than beer.

  21. come on slashdot seriously by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is simple highschool physics. the real problem we need to research and investigate is why do beer bottles unexpectedly and inappropriately become empty.
    I have, as a scientist, conducted extensive research myself and have to date been unable to conclude a definitive cause. I implore slashdotters, if you have any experience in this phenomenon or have experienced it personally, please adhere to your diligence as scientists and provide additional research data. bottles, glasses and even steins will exhibit this behavior, so please consider this in your testing protocol.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:come on slashdot seriously by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      the real problem we need to research and investigate is why do beer bottles unexpectedly and inappropriately become empty

      I've done extensive testing on this, and have concluded that what is actually happening is a volumetric transference from the vessel to the imbiber, at a rate proportional to the time the glass spends separated from the flat surface.

      You can predict the transfer rate by both the frequency with which the glass goes through it's lifting cycle and the tilt angle of the container at any given moment. Usually approaching 45 degrees suggest imminent container emptiness.

      There's a second relationship whereby the imbiber themselves become vessels, and for certain forms of liquids (ie beer), the outflow rate from the secondary container increases according to the amount of liquid transferred in.

      What I haven't been able to identify is how some containers become full -- I routinely see vessels which become full with substances like Jagermeister and white tequila, for which I've not been able to identify any rational explanation.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:come on slashdot seriously by Morpf · · Score: 1

      I am a quite sure condensation is the cause of this undesired behavior. But to further back up this thesis I have to conduct extensive research.

  22. Drink it while it's cold by Grisstle · · Score: 1

    The condensation makes the beer look tasty and I plan to drink it while it's still cold, not study it.

    1. Re:Drink it while it's cold by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      The condensation makes the beer look tasty

      It makes it look like in the advertisements, because advertising uses condensation to make it look cold.

      It's funny how the brain works.

    2. Re:Drink it while it's cold by Grisstle · · Score: 1

      True enough, a bottle of beer doesn't look like it could be cold if it's dry on the outside.

  23. This research needs independent verification by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

    I volunteer!

    1. Re:This research needs independent verification by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Okay, you're the control group. Now cover yourself in condensation and get in the fridge.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:This research needs independent verification by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

      Being warm-blooded, I'm a poor choice of control. Now, if I were to fill ma belly with several pints of tasty cold beerz, I might indeed be able to play a role.

      Cheers and bottoms up!

  24. Re:As I'm a teetotaler... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    And yet you felt compelled to post. What's that about?

    Stuff that doesn't interest me happens all the time. If I had the same compunction to comment on all of them I'd never get anything done.

    Or is this another case of Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own a Television?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  25. Are you Serious? by kuhnto · · Score: 1

    Is this really news? WHAT? Entropy? Condensation? Thermodynamics? Events unfolding along the time continuum... I... Actually,.. Do Not... Know... what... To Say... Condensation... . On a beer glass... ...We put a man on the moon, and yet we JUST figured this out.

    --
    "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
  26. Um, no shit? by DdJ · · Score: 2

    Isn't this basic high school science class stuff? Yes, condensation raises temperatures, just like evaporation lowers temperatures.

    That's the whole reason human beings can sweat to cool off.

    A lot of people presumably know about that. Are those people surprised that this works "in both directions"?

  27. Only with American beer by fynfuqbg · · Score: 5, Funny

    condensation can raise the temperature of your beer by nine degrees!"

    This happens only with American beer, in the rest of the world the temperature raises only by five degrees

  28. No shit, Einstein by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Phase transition from gas to liquid is exothermic?

    This is a fun classroom experiment, but it isn't science news.

    1. Re:No shit, Einstein by RichMan · · Score: 1

      The level of basic science/math illiteracy never ceases to amaze me.

      What the heck does happen in the school system?

  29. Re:As I'm a teetotaler... by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Really? Maybe you don't drink wine, but this also affects the Mountain Dew of basement dwellers. ;)

    I kid, I kid.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  30. Don't need science ta tell me dat! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Turns out that condensation on your favorite chilled beverage is abad thing for keeping it cold

    It's also bad because you're losing beer as it leaks out thru microholes.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  31. Give these guys an IG Noble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, this one is in the 'duh' category. The only meaningful thing to come out of it is that my Harley-Davidson can/bottle cozy works better than advertised on my favorite can of Schlitz. It insulates the can from my hand (and the general environment). Keeps condensation to a minimum. And, completely stylish to boot!

    Off to swill another six-pack and shoot some poor, defenseless, varmint, lawyers or revenuers from my back porch.

    For what it's worth:
    Surface area of can ~ 53.25" ^2
    Volume of .004" water film ~0.22 in ^3 = 3.6ml
    Latent heat of fusion - water - 520kcal / kg. Or, 1,872 heat calories for our example.
    1KCal is enough heat to heat 1Kg H2O 1 deg C.
    1Cal is enough heat to heat 1g H20 1 deg C.
    355ml of liquid in std 12oz (US can).
    1,872Cal / 355ml = 5.7deg C (just in condensation).
    3.6ml * 60 deg difference = an additional 216 Cal, or about another deg C.
    6.7 deg C. = 12.06 deg F. Within spitt'n distance of the article.

    I don't think the varmints in WA thought about having to cool down the condensation to the same temp as the can once it was condensed. That heat comes from the can, and it's contents, and so warms it up as well. Also, the thermal values used are for pure water. Beer is water (mostly - even that panther-piss known as Old Style), but some other salts, alcohol (the good stuff!), dissolved CO2 and other aromatic bits to give it flavor, color, and odor. And, there is the can itself - it has mass that needs to be taken into account.

    Note - I'm estimating the area/volume of the can as a perfect cylinder - Someone with a laser scanner can get the exact can geometry. I'm currently using mine to design a new cam shaft on my old lady's ride

    Just 'cause I talk like a hick doesn't mean I'm stupid like you college pukes.

    AC

    1. Re:Give these guys an IG Noble... by tibit · · Score: 1

      You're in good company. Feynman spoke like a blue-collar guy too.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:Give these guys an IG Noble... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not bad, except you want heat of vaporization, not of fusion. You actually used the right number, just called it the wrong thing.

  32. this is news? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Vapor going to liquid needs to ditch heat ... where do you think it is going? It isn't just the temperature differential either it is that there is a state change so you's got to pay the cost of the heat of vaporization too.

  33. Buy better beer by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    The only reason people need to chill there beer so much is because it tastes so bad. Cold things simply taste less. If you have a drink that tasted good, you wouldn't need to drink it at near freezing temperatures.

  34. Higher temps are a good thing for most ales by conman09 · · Score: 1

    A temperature in the 50 degree range is considered optimal for beers with more depth of flavor. The higher temperature allows the hops and grain to shine. However, if you're drinking American Piss Light, you probably want it ice cold so it tastes as close to water as possible.

  35. ...another reason to use a coozy.... by nblender · · Score: 2

    My co-workers mock me for my beer rituals... If we go to a patio for a few cold ones at lunch, I won't let the server take the menu away... I need the menu to shade my beer so the UV doesn't make the hops all skunky. Nobody believes that I can even taste the difference but it's obvious to me... Skunky beer sucks... So if you're on a patio, keep it shaded or in a coozy...

  36. Bathroom experiment?! by trboyden · · Score: 1

    The line "Two researchers conducted an experiment in their bathroom..." doesn't inspire a whole lot of confidence or credibility to the alleged findings... A temperature controlled clean-room laboratory, maybe...

    1. Re:Bathroom experiment?! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I first read that as a temperature controlled clean-room lavatory, and thought that it would probably be a very relaxing place.

  37. How do you know? by MarcAuslander · · Score: 1

    People always claim that bad beer tastes like piss. And I always wonder how they know! Which reminds me of a childhood memory. We were in the Catskills in what was then called a bungalow colony. One day, for some reasons, the owner had to siphon some gas, which he started by sucking on the hose. My dad asked what it tasted like - it tastes like manure he said. Once we were away, my dad wondered aloud how he knew.

    1. Re:How do you know? by julesh · · Score: 1

      We were in the Catskills in what was then called a bungalow colony.

      Like an ant colony, only much bigger?

  38. yes duh by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    If the cold is getting out cooling the air on the surface of a container, then the heat is obviously getting in. Someone failed thermodynamics.

    Hey World!, how about we cure cancer or figure out cheap clean unlimited energy first.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  39. Duh, no shit sherlock by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    A lot of heat is released from water vapor when it condenses.

  40. IgNobel by mynameiskhan · · Score: 1

    A strong IgNobel 2013 Contender. All the best to Dale Durran and Dargan Frierson and the University of Washington.

  41. Almost makes sense... by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    Just look at the reverse of latent heat of evaporation - 2,270 kJ/kg. For each bit of condensation a LOT of energy is used to make the transition. The ratio of 2,270/~4.2 goes a long way to explaining this.

    More than this needs to be considered (relative humidity for example) but Evaporation of condensation must be considered in addition to just condensation. The initial temperature of the pour is important. A properly cooled british beer near room temperature is not in the same camp as a beer from a lightly salted aMerican ice chest.

    A solid pint glass that has been chilled and rinsed in an ice bath is also important to me. Since glass is a very good insulator when compared to an aluminum pop top a thick pre chilled glass mug works wonders.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  42. Inevitable in tropical countries by javaguy · · Score: 1

    The last time I had condensation on my beer I was sitting beside the pool at a resort in Samoa. 33 degrees Celsius, not a cloud in the sky, view like a postcard, and plenty more beer in the bar's fridge. The condensation didn't bother me all that much.