Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Reputation Manager's Guide To Xbox One

symbolset writes "In the wake of a disastrous E3 product reveal Microsoft has purportedly distributed a confidential internal 100-point 'FAQ' for the Xbox One that reads like it's from the Ministry of Truth. It was of course immediately leaked on pastebin. Kotaku has the story and an amusing online poll. In the discussion below make sure to line up the FAQ entries with the AC comments for extra 'Informative' moderation."

611 comments

  1. Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just in: The XBone One has managed to achieve what the Dreamcast couldn't... blowing up prior to launch. The Dreamcast at least fired the engines before exploding in a firey storm of shit. Which, given that their customers seem to be EA games and other publishers, and not, you know, people who are going to buy the console... seems about right.

    There are Kickstarter consoles still on the drawing board, I mean, not even prototypes available yet, that have more pre-orders than the XBone. I don't think they could fail harder. Unless (dramatic pause) ... they bring Square Enix to headline this collossal cluster f*ck.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are Kickstarter consoles still on the drawing board, I mean, not even prototypes available yet, that have more pre-orders than the XBone. I don't think they could fail harder. Unless (dramatic pause) ... they bring Square Enix to headline this collossal cluster f*ck.

      \

      Citation badly needed.

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:Damage control by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Informative

      Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

    3. Re:Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Funny

      i don't understand and maybe I missed it in the news but there's no link in the summary... why was the XBone having a bad launch at E3? it seems like a cool product to me.

      Sir, I'm going to have to ask for your geek badge. Anonymous Cowards -- please escort this person from the building, and then give him a 20 second head start before releasing the dogs. If he replies to this comment, reduce it to 10 seconds.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      frownie face! still no link... my priorities: 1) assassin's creed 4 must be awesome. 2) no rrod. then i am a happy camper!

    5. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://i.imgur.com/hCn6DQc.png

    6. Re:Damage control by Noland150 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I care about the broadband internet requirement since I live where none is available. I know we are a minority, but there are millions of us.

    7. Re:Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Citation badly needed.

      Well, since you were a bit non-specific on what you're feeling butthurt about, I'll have to guess...Holy shit, a console made out of spare parts still has a better rep than the Xbone. Allows you to run your own software. Costs $99. 63,000 pre-orders. Meanwhile, at Microsoft HQ... "There aren't any official numbers..." (troll face)

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some do care and some do not, I know I won't buy it.
      And if I buy it, that's because it's moddable and can do cool things with it.

      Sony learnt it with the GeoHotz case, do not fuck with users' features! If I get an xbox it mean someone hacked it and made it possible to copy games. It does the backward effects on my, it drives me to piracy. I used to buy used games all the times, I am going to the 360 a little bit longer.
      Thanks

    9. Re:Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

      Normally I'd snark this, but I got nothing. I mean, I'm just bone dry here. It's so stupidifying that I think it may have temporarily caused my brain to seize up like an old VW bug.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    10. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are Microsoft's market. People who want to play games and are willing to let Microsoft fuck them silly as long as they get to play. Without you and those like you they'd die a miserable death. It remains to be seen how many people are willing to bend over like that. I guess we will find out soon.

    11. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Actually I have a dual core Kickstarter ARM/Android gamestick platform I picked up at Walmart for $79 a couple months ago. It was kickstarted. It's Equiso. The controller sucks, but the stick is first rate with 1080p and Google Play. Fortunately decent compatible controllers can be had for twelve bucks on Amazon.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    12. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, i knew we'd have a tardy fanboy defending oppressive DRM sooner or later. cool.

    13. Re:Damage control by batkiwi · · Score: 0, Troll

      After you buy a game on steam you don't ever have to connect to the internet again.

      If you load a game on a laptop and take it with you on vacation you can play the games.

      If your internet goes out for a week you can play the games.

      If you troll the forums and get your account banned you can play the games (just not online MP). (With the xbone, if your live account is banned you lose access to all of your games, even singleplayer)

      So I'm not certain what your point was, perhaps you can elaborate?

    14. Re:Damage control by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      do you really think anybody cares about the limitations? i just want to play fun, good quality games. shit games are shit even if i buy them used. i have xbox online anyway so there's no difference it if phones home. in short, mountians out of molehills, you know what that means?

      A couple million military members and contractors do care about that. Phone home once a day? Hardcore region locked? Always on microphone? Not happening.

    15. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citation badly needed.

      Well, since you were a bit non-specific on what you're feeling butthurt about, I'll have to guess...Holy shit, a console made out of spare parts still has a better rep than the Xbone. Allows you to run your own software. Costs $99. 63,000 pre-orders. Meanwhile, at Microsoft HQ... "There aren't any official numbers..." (troll face)

      Where are the hard numbers from Sony on PS4 sales? According to your logic, that must mean the Ouya has a "better rep" and more orders than the PS4, right?

      --
      This space for rent.
    16. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, do you have any life whatsoever outside of making first post trolls about Microsoft and the Xbox One?

      People said the same thing you just did about the PS3 being late and overpriced, and it still sold 80M units. And the Xbox One sold out it's initial inventory in a bit over 4 hours. There is absolutely nothing outside your uninformed opinion that indicates it will be a short or long term failure.

    17. Re:Damage control by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      You should be looking at the PC version then, as it is known to be far superior to console versions if you're in it for just one game.

    18. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got nothing because you clearly don't understand how Steam works...

    19. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      do you really think anybody cares about the limitations?

      Yes. If it was so different and awesome in architecture that it delivered really innovative stuff then this might be OK. But it uses the same processor, slower RAM, more RAM reserved for OS, slower GPU. The hardware is in every way equal or worse - so the software and terms must be better to compensate - and they aren't.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    20. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the citation showing that consoles on Kickstarter have more preorders than the Xbox One. Oh wait....

      --
      This space for rent.
    21. Re:Damage control by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It wouldn't be the first time a PR guy has lied.

    22. Re:Damage control by Hachima · · Score: 1

      This is not true. For example Anno 2070 on Steam 3rd-party DRM: Solidshield Tages SAS 3 machine activation limit Steam games are allowed to use any DRM they want. So it has both machine activation limits and at one time required an internet connection to play until Ubisoft changed it. You can buy MMOs on steam which require a subscription plus internet connection to play. Steam is a publisher and distributor. If they aren't the publisher, the game may come with an internet required DRM system.

    23. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and YOU! Why are you asking this question by responding to the GPs remark to the GGP that has nothing to do with anything???

      Do people not know how threaded discussions work? OY.

    24. Re:Damage control by mjwx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

      Normally I'd snark this, but I got nothing. I mean, I'm just bone dry here. It's so stupidifying that I think it may have temporarily caused my brain to seize up like an old VW bug.

      Or a new VW DSG.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you have no response to his honest question and instead mock-threaten him? You are a total douche, you know that?

      A tiny Internet minority complained about some Xbox One features and the media played it up. Big deal. 45M of the 80M Xbox 360s are online with Xbox Live Gold accounts anyway, and that percentage is likely to rise with more features (at least no reason to see it fall). Will it be a massive hit? Who knows, time will tell. But calling it DOA at this point is braindead FUD.

    26. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be the first time a PR guy has lied.

      Uh oh, I just heard a PR guy say GigaplexNZ doesn't like to suck donkey dick and take it in the ass from goats.

    27. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? Enough that Sony made commercials mocking Microsoft to much applause?

    28. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really think anybody cares about the limitations?

      Even if people don't care about DRM limitations in general, the Microsoft system is FAR too complex for the average user.

      Try explaining to the average 13 year old and his blue-collar parents when he can't or cannot sell a game or share it with a friend. Traditional console DRM works because it's easy to understand: the disc is the game.

    29. Re:Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Funny

      If it was so different and awesome in architecture that it delivered really innovative stuff then this might be OK

      Yeah, if my car could go 500 MPH and get 100 miles to the gallon, but could only drive on gravel country roads far from where I live, it might be okay. Coz you know, car analogies. Obligatory. -_-

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    30. Re:Damage control by girlintraining · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You know mods... I was going more for inciteful than insightful... also known as "funny". Please, if you're gonna mod me up for being a snarky bitch, at least make sure the final mod is Funny, ok? I got a reputation to uphold.... :)

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    31. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Thank you. That was the finest exemplar of what trolling should be.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    32. Re:Damage control by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 0

      You should have been more clear on the used games bit.

      game publishers can enable you to trade in your games at participating retailers

      http://news.xbox.com/2013/06/license

      Basically, go fuck yourself, the horse you rode in on, your mother, and anyone you feel like, because that will fill the time you aren't playing used games. Most publishers will allow it, but that is a statistic, and the outliers will surely be the biggest targets for piracy.

      How it will shake out: if you can pirate the game somehow, you will not be allowed to buy it used. This matches everything we have seen from most software publishers, and the biggest game distributors. Not game studios, because they produce a game. Distributors because they add DRM and whatever else they think might be a bottom-line improvement.

      I expect a few lawsuits between game production companies and their distributors. Or if they are smart, contract changes.

    33. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking about buying my daughter the new xBox for a bonus. She's been a trooper about helping with her little sibs. Always on webcam though? I'm thinking no. PS4.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    34. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lots of people are pissed over the price since the specs are worse than the PS4.
      Lots of people are pissed about not being able to freely trade games.
      Lots of people are pissed about being required to get online once every 24 hours.

      Of course even with all that there's still going to be plenty of people buying the Xbox, it's not going to be anywhere near the disaster that the Internet Armchair Quarterback Brigade are calling it, though I don't think there's any chance of the PS4 not having a better launch. Myself I don't really care about those, but I've recently reconsidered my gaming in general and decided to focus on the PC more. I'll evaluate the consoles in a year or two and see which one is the better deal. Most particularly I'm going to be looking for whether Gran Turismo 6 is even out, and if it is if it can compare to Forza 5.

    35. Re:Damage control by Clsid · · Score: 2

      You do realize that if for some reason your connection goes down you will be unable to play? What kind of idiot does not understand what that means for a consumer? Plus it costs more than $100 dollars more than the PS4 because of a feature I don't want (Kinect). I don't live in a farm, far from it, but I won't buy such a handicapped system, especially when there are alternatives. DRM isn't even the major issue here, since in my eyes they are doing the same thing Steam is doing in the PC, sans the extreme price cuts. To me it comes down to value, in terms of dollars I have to spend and stupid restrictions. Add to the fire the condescending attitude of saying, the problem it's not the system, it's you, and you have the situation we have today.

    36. Re:Damage control by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The OP's post is idiotic. Amazon has stated they are almost sold out of the launch-day PS4 and Xbox One supply already, and analysts are pretty much in agreement both will be totally sold out over the holiday season (I think the estimates were something like 3-4M worldwide over that time?)

    37. Re:Damage control by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know if you just coined it or someone else did way before. But it's the first time I've seen it called "XBone." I think the name will stick.

      People are not just skeptical of this thing, they are outright afraid of it.

      Microsoft... wow... just wow.

    38. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

      ...which also must connect to the internet or it locks you out, only it gives you slightly longer (a week if I recall) between connections.

    39. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      The Ouya will probably be a joke in the long-run, a console for nerds to monkey around with that won't get serious traction with any major titles. A lot of the people ordering it are going to hack it into something else, the ones who keep it as is most likely won't have the ecosystem available to draw major titles their way.

      I could be wrong, only time will tell, but I don't see the Ouya doing any better than the Wii U.

    40. Re:Damage control by Clsid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason why he said that is because Steam is far from a good thing. It is cool it provides a digital library with downloadable games. It is bad that you have to run Steam in order to play the game that you have already paid. It is bad that games are ridden with DRM. Sure, that might be a sign of times to come but for people that grew up playing games the old fashioned way, we clearly see that as a disadvantage instead of some revolutionary system.

    41. Re:Damage control by Seumas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amazon put up a poll for XBOX ONE versus PLAYSTATION 4 and they quickly canceled the poll, because with about 45,000 votes, 95% of them were for the PS4. It was a slaughter.

      http://gengame.net/2013/06/amazon-prematurely-ends-ps4-vs-xbox-one-poll-when-ps4-takes-95-of-the-vote/

    42. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it when people post on the Internet that they don't have access to it. Duuuuuuuh.

    43. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in: The XBone One has managed to achieve what the Dreamcast couldn't... blowing up prior to launch. The Dreamcast at least fired the engines before exploding in a firey storm of shit.

      Your tone implies the Dreamcast was a disaster from the ground up, like the XBone is. As I recall, it was only a disaster on the management and marketing end; the thing was quite powerful for its day, well ahead of its time in many ways (it had internet connectivity built in from day one, for instance, while the other consoles were struggling with quite-neglected modems). And though it ultimately failed in the market and killed off the already on-the-ropes console department of Sega, it's got unique games that are well-regarded today.

      You, sir or madam, are insulting the name of mere failure by including the XBone within it.

    44. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Taylor Swift was sent to a school for the deaf when they put up a poll asking where she should perform. Popular internet polls are as reliable as astrology. I'll wait for the launch before declaring a winner, and even then the PS3 staged a comeback in the last few years, so an early lead isn't a permadeath sentence.

    45. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      One of these things is not like the other one, not like the other one...

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    46. Re: Damage control by Therad · · Score: 5, Funny

      More like you have to drive the car one only on asphalt. And once a day you must drive at least a mile on asphalt otherwise you can't open the the backseat and the trunk. But you get tv in the car!

    47. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Microsoft learned nothing from Blizzard's Diablo3 fiasco.

    48. Re: Damage control by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      A previous Microsoft PR Rep said that a banned account loses full account access, including to downloaded games, just like the Xbox 360. Just because the story has now changed does not make the old information a lie. It just means that someone isn't keeping up on the day-to-day changes recpgarding Microsoft's policy changes on an unreleased service.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    49. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really think anybody cares about the limitations? i just want to play fun, good quality games. shit games are shit even if i buy them used. i have xbox online anyway so there's no difference it if phones home. in short, mountians out of molehills, you know what that means?

      Right now it's mostly techies and relatively hard core gamers that are even paying attention. It's easy to say most people don't care about limitations, and it's no big deal that it phones home everyday....the first time your ISP decides to go dark for a couple hours (that just happen to be 23 hours from last check-in) or the MS servers decide to go down in a region or get hacked or get DDOSed, suddenly everyone will care.

      These things will happen. It is likely that some of them will happen on launch day, and on Christmas. It will be a disaster.

    50. Re:Damage control by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3

      It's not fair to call the Dreamcast's untimely demise a fiery storm of shit. The Dreamcast had a lot of good points, even if it did ultimately fail. While mistakes were made, the Dreamcast was hardly shitty.

    51. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you're going with this. PS3 was so legendary a departure from the common platform that the US Navy used it for supercompute. It delivered this thing I speak of. Neither of these new ones do. That doesn't mean I'm questing after unicorns, nor inventing requirements that are unhelpful.

      What are you getting at?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    52. Re:Damage control by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      https://twitter.com/XboxSupport1/status/345338828606812160

      Care to retract and or restate your comment?

      That is an official microsoft support channel stating exactly what I said.

    53. Re:Damage control by r0xtarninja · · Score: 2

      To be fair, they probably from Diablo 3 that they can add all the silly restrictions they want and still make money hand over fist.

    54. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      At this point you could make a youtube video of an 8.5x11 sheet with the word "Microsoft" on it being wadded up and trashed, and sell ads against it on Youtube.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    55. Re:Damage control by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I first started seeing "XBone" references during the E3 conference, but it's quite possible it's been around since the rumors about the restrictions started making the rounds on the net. However my favorite "joke" name, given the randomness with which Microsoft seems to be choosing the number to follow "XBox", is the "XBox 1984."

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    56. Re:Damage control by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I care about things like buying a game on my account on my console in the den and letting another family member play it on their account on my other console in the home theater, without incurring a $10 fee or having to re-buy the entire game. The "ten family members" thing is a bullshit solution that I do not accept. It needs to be tied to my hardware, which they know is mine because I register it with serial number on xbox.com. Then, anyone should be able to play the game in my home, whether it's ten people or fifty.

      And, of course, phoning home absolutely matters when your internet is out. Or if you have a machine somewhere in your home that isn't connected. Or you are taking it with you to a cabin on vacation or something.

      Frankly, it doesn't matter why or when you might do these things. As the customer, it is our obligation to say what we want and the company's job to provide it. It isn't my job to justify why I don't want to deal with their bullshit which in no way benefits the customer.

    57. Re: Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2

      It was a lowest level support rep on twitter versus the Director of Programming for the Xbox. Who was likely to have got confused and who would actually know better?

      --
      This space for rent.
    58. Re:Damage control by sconeu · · Score: 0

      To be fair, though... it would save the rest of us if she did perform there...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    59. Re:Damage control by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      Cable/DSL != the Internet.

      Even worse is those whose Internet service occasionally goes flakey. There may only be a small number of days a year that you have only smart phone-based access to the net, but it's on precisely those days when you'd really like to play a game.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    60. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps some minimum wage twitter support rep got confused and got corrected by the Director of Programming of Xbox.

      --
      This space for rent.
    61. Re:Damage control by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh huh. Steam is DRM and requires Internet too. If your Steam gets closed down or whatever, then you lose all your games. Also, you can't sell/transfer your games too.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    62. Re:Damage control by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Running Steam isn't much of a hassle now. It used to be a bit of a resource hog, but not any more - it's currently using 74MB of RAM. Whoopdie shit. Other than an OCD obsession from the 90s about not having any background apps left open, it doesn't make any significant difference.

      Most games on Steam don't have additional DRM, and I don't buy those that do.

      And if you don't like Steam, go with GOG.com games. All of 'em are DRM free.

    63. Re: Damage control by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The big problem problem that new consoles are fighting for is: a reason to exist. Most games demo-ed so far look possible on the current generation of hardware. Crowd sources AI is an interesting twist, but possible on current consoles. Killer Instinct is an odd thing to revive, but it would play just as well on a PS3.

      Suddenly Microsoft comes out with a console that:
      1. Phones home every day.
      2. Bans game lending.
      3. Possibly cripples the used game market, or maybe not, nobody is really sure.
      4. Requires Kinect to be always on, because that wasn't a disaapointment.

      Their sales pitch of "You can play games that are basically last-gen games, but with fewer rights" has had shocking trouble resonating with consumers.

    64. Re:Damage control by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 2

      I accidentally all my customer base?

    65. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you buy a game on steam you don't ever have to connect to the internet again.

      If you load a game on a laptop and take it with you on vacation you can play the games.

      If your internet goes out for a week you can play the games.

      If you troll the forums and get your account banned you can play the games (just not online MP). (With the xbone, if your live account is banned you lose access to all of your games, even singleplayer)

      So I'm not certain what your point was, perhaps you can elaborate?

      That is actually false. You DO need to connect again to steam, steam provides you with a limited time offline capability that needs to be renewed. no where near as often as the Xbox One but it still isn't a install and forget about online.

    66. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1, Informative

      That poll was all over reddit trying to get people to vote for PS4 to show their Xbox hate. I am surprised they only got 38K people to vote.That actually shows how small the online vocal minority raking up hate on twitter, reddit and forums like this one.

      --
      This space for rent.
    67. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was a lowest level support rep on twitter versus the Director of Programming for the Xbox. Who was likely to have got confused

      The way Microsoft operates, most likely both.

    68. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 3, Informative

      The webcam on these other things doesn't disable the gear if you block it. If the XBone webcam is obstructed the games will not play. Remembering to block the cam before putting her jammies on is more than I expect from my daughters, and more than I expect to need to.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    69. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you quoting from your Guide or making this stuff up as you go?

    70. Re:Damage control by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps some minimum wage twitter support rep got confused and got corrected by the Director of Programming of Xbox.

      Would that be anything like the guy a few months ago who leaked all that stuff about "has to be online, no resale of games, etc" who got canned, and then once the release details were out...well...what do you know, all of the info the guy "leaked" was correct.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    71. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been playing Oblivion on Steam in offline mode for a couple of months now because I currently have a data limited internet connection. It's been working fine.

    72. Re: Damage control by yotto · · Score: 1

      More like you have to drive the car one only on asphalt. And once a day you must drive at least a mile on asphalt otherwise you can't open the the backseat and the trunk. But you get tv in the car!

      ...for a modest fee, of course.

    73. Re:Damage control by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 2

      The dreamcast owned well and long after it "failed". It failed because its best virtue was also its achilles heel; you could easily pirate all the games. That's why the dreamcast will live on forever. Calling the dreamcast a "shit" means you don't know what you are talking about.

      You seem to have an opinion on every single slashdot story, so its not surprising that your knowledge might be spread a bit thin.

      --
      -
    74. Re:Damage control by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      To quote you:

      "Please stop making up shit"

      I was not making up shit. I had a referenced reply which directly stated what I was claiming.

      A marketing droid (who has an awesome podcast) stated the opposite in your video. You ask "who would more likely know the details". I'll ask "who would more likely lie and throw spin as opposed to accidentally revealing corporate policy". Major Nelson has constantly been "wrong" about many things in the past pertaining to xbox live features and releases.

      How is my comment about differences between steam and xbox one a "witch hunt" ? Who am I hunting?

      "You just want to hate on the Xbox and are willing to deny facts for that."

      We are both going on conflicting statements made by the same company. I am not denying facts, NEITHER of us have facts as the system has not been released. We both had statements made by the company.

      I don't "hate on" the xbox, I owned the xbox classic and the 360, and am a HUGE forza fan.

      You have some sort of problem with open discussion, which is fine, but don't go attacking others shouting "FACTS FACTS!" when neither of us have facts, and mine were in reaction to a scoffing remark implying that steam had the same restrictions as the xbox one, which it doesn't.

    75. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      No, the canned guy made silly remarks on twitter while acting on behalf of MS. Try dissing your company's customers in front of your company folks and see how it goes. (if you work i.e).

      --
      This space for rent.
    76. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citation needed about that.

      The Kinect is required because they want to encourage game devs to use the Kinect. If it were optional, developers may skip using some features since they may not be available. I don't see how it won't work if cam is obstructed.

      --
      This space for rent.
    77. Re:Damage control by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that XBone is bad, it's that the PS4 is much better (atleast on paper).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    78. Re: Damage control by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      The big problem problem that new consoles are fighting for is: a reason to exist. Most games demo-ed so far look possible on the current generation of hardware. Crowd sources AI is an interesting twist, but possible on current consoles. Killer Instinct is an odd thing to revive, but it would play just as well on a PS3.

      Suddenly Microsoft comes out with a console that:
      1. Phones home every day.
      2. Bans game lending.
      3. Possibly cripples the used game market, or maybe not, nobody is really sure.
      4. Requires Kinect to be always on, because that wasn't a disaapointment.

      Their sales pitch of "You can play games that are basically last-gen games, but with fewer rights" has had shocking trouble resonating with consumers.

      You missed does more than play games. It might not be important to the hardcore gamer, or even the semi-hardcore gamer, but in the long run it could make the difference.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    79. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tiny? Try 63 million uniques. Dear microsoft PR, you won't win this battle with trolls and stockholders. We a gamers! We know what we want and you can't change that. Love my 360. Have 40 games for it. I paid full price for 18 of them. My next console is a ps4. I don't care about your politics. I care about hurricane sandy and 17 days without internet. I care about my vacation to upstate PA with no internet. I care about my brother in the army and his 2 million plus active service members with no or flaky internet. Good bye Xbox.

    80. Re:Damage control by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

      How is the webcam different from the ones on every iPhone, iPad, Android phone and tablet and PCs/laptops?

      And you the famous anti-MS hater zealot considered buying Xbox? C'mon, stop making up things.

      I did a search for your handle to answer one of your replies and damn man ur all over this thread.
      Two things come to mind here; a very large percentage of post are to benefit a product or company (not real) and damage control.

      To answer your reply, every iPhone, iPad, Android phone and tablet and PCs/laptops normally aren't set-up prominently in the living room to watch everybody.

      Noticed a reply below that says: " If the XBone webcam is obstructed the games will not play." that's totally unacceptable.
      Read this: "Meet the men who spy on women through their webcams"
      http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/rat-breeders-meet-the-men-who-spy-on-women-through-their-webcams/

    81. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      You totally failed to mention MajorNelson's take on the issue in your post and instead took the twitter rep statement as fact. If you didn't have facts as you admit now why make that post categorically stating without any caveats that one loses access to single player games on getting banned? Sorry for my outburst, but there are a lot of people already invested into the PS4 ecosystem who are using every opportunity to discount the Xbox One on internet forums, regardless of facts.

      --
      This space for rent.
    82. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you heard, but not every game needs to see us to be fun.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    83. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      I like the xbone controls better. I also love the name xbone!

    84. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      You never have your phone around you when you are having conversations with people?

      --
      This space for rent.
    85. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Trying this again. Do you have a reference stating that games won't run if cam is obstructed?

      --
      This space for rent.
    86. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had to be a dick about it huh?

    87. Re:Damage control by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      So wait, retrospectively: factual statements = silly remarks. Gotcha.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    88. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference saying it won't?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    89. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps he doesn't live in the Reddit and blogosphere vocal minority bubble hating on the PS4.
      Reddit posted a Facebook poll by Amazon about PS4 vs. XBox One multiple times to game it. The PS4 got only 38K votes, that shows how small the vocal minority is....

      --
      This space for rent.
    90. Re:Damage control by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 2

      People are not just skeptical of this thing, they are outright afraid of it.

      Microsoft... wow... just wow.

      You forget that the people buying XBox watch TV commercials and that their competitor is the root-kit maker Sony.

      This will hurt the XBox One like the rootkit fiasco or dropping Linux PS2 support hurt Sony --- this amount precisely and scientifically stated as "none at all".

      Reality. Reality bites and marketing dollars matter. Film at 11.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    91. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reply is making up shit(not surprised, Slashdot hates MS and likes to make up lies about them). Games will play if cam is obstructed.

    92. Re:Damage control by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

      There are also millions of dialup internet users. They are not very interested in your demographic, mostly because you aren't the kind of perpetual revenue stream they are interested in. They will be quite content for your lower-profit demographic to migrate to another device. This is how they think and the reality of democracy thru purchaser-dollars --- comparable to the same people who say they won't buy DLC or buy stats for a game, they just say "fine" and move along.

      Welcome to 2013.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    93. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      No, see the last tweet here.

      http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/sweet-billy-adam-orth.jpg?w=804

      Thats a silly remark insulting rural places. Any company would fire anyone who made such comments.

      --
      This space for rent.
    94. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Ultimately a troll is a plea for attention: a request for replies. The worst sort of troll is one that seeks to start a fight. The best sort is a question that goes the the heart of the issue and needs further answer than TFA provides. This one was the best sort. I didn't mean any harm by calling it a troll. Trolling is a sort of fishing where you put your line in and hope for the best. Here noh8rz10 did it well this time, and it's good to encourage newcomers, so I did.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    95. Re:Damage control by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      (With the xbone, if your live account is banned you lose access to all of your games, even singleplayer)

      Please stop making up shit, that's why I hate this circlejerk of hate and its disregard for facts.

      I've mod points today but they wouldn't help you, instead a reply

      He mentions a person banned will keep their games but if they are banned how would this be of any benefit?
      Google Define:Banned > Officially exclude (someone) from a place.

      Or maybe Sony's reputation management has been very successful planting lies on Reddit.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lMhjM9BK7M

      Mr Nelson is asked why someone playing a physical disk can't be off line for more than 24 hours,
      wouldn't a please insert disk be a better approach?

      He's bumbling around for an answer he never gives for well over a minute (and where I stopped watching)
      Reddit or Sony did do much, the video pretty well takes care of that itself.

      Do read the text below the video:
      "Hey guys. Chloe here (the interviewer). I didn't follow up on his responses because my opinions didn't represent the opinions
      of the community (Reddit) I was representing."

    96. Re:Damage control by symbolset · · Score: 1

      So buy a PS4. Was that so hard?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    97. Re: Damage control by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You missed does more than play games.

      But Apple hasn't...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    98. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for admitting you made that up to lie and mislead people and you have no reason to believe that obstructing the cam will prevent you from playing games.

      Now I doubt whether you even have a daughter, or you just made her up to score some anti-MS points . I wouldn't put that past you.

      --
      recoiledsnake

    99. Re:Damage control by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      People typically get banned on Xbox for cheating on multiplayer games, like using aimbots etc.

      The question was about access to single player games if you got banned on multiplayer games

      He said, of course you will have access. The parent post said you'd be banned from playing your single player games if you got banned on Xbox Live. So yes, the benefit is access to single player games when you're banned from multiplayer games for cheating or being an abusive troll using bad language etc. in voice chat. Hope that makes it clear.

      I didn't need help, you did :)

      --
      This space for rent.
    100. Re: Damage control by Therad · · Score: 1

      You also don't need to use your steering wheel, you just have to flap your arms around. And you can start it by shouting at it. Oh, and if you must drive on gravel they also sell Car 360*. It is also 20% more expensive than PlayCar4 and has less horse power. * for a little while at least.

    101. Re:Damage control by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      I had not yet seen MajorNelson's reply, as I avoid the reddit gaming forums entirely (the homebrewing forum is awesome though!) and don't have access to dedicated gaming sites from work. It appears it was only posted 1 day ago (I'm in Australia, already through Monday here).

      I didn't have facts, but I had statements from the company. The twitter statement is the last thing I'd seen stated by actual MS employees. I wasn't making things up, ignoring "facts," nor anything else you accused me of.

      How is anyone invested in the PS4 ecosystem when it's out yet? Or you just mean emotionally?

      I think that there are a lot of mistakes in the xbox one DRM, and hopefully they'll be fixing them. I won't buy one until they get fixed, but I don't care if you do or not!

      What I want changed:

      -daily checkins are fine, but only disable playing if it's been ~4 weeks since a successful checkin. Broadband outages happen, and that's exaclty when you want to churn through the latest RPG because you can't do your "normal" entertainment things.

      -if I have a disk in my hand, I should be able to play that game single player offline, regardless of having a net connection/whether it's used or new/etc.

      -If this system is all about advantages, I should be able to lend a game to anyone "digitally" without cost nor effort. "lend game to Jimmy for 30 days" and it disables the license on my xbox. After 30 days it reverts back, and I can continue lending it or not. I am fine if I cannot play the game while it's "lent".

      -Allow resale on market terms. Make it like the apple store, though, and take 30% of the resale price (10% to MS, 20% to publisher?) rather than setting prices and disallowing some games to be resold. They've REALLY missed the boat on that one, as they could have an internal "ebay" like system where you list used games for sale. EVERYONE wins under that scenario.

      -GUARANTEE ALL DIGITAL DELIVERY GAMES WILL WORK ON FUTURE "xbox" CONSOLES. This is a big one. I'm annoyed that my XBLA games (we have >$500 invested in them) will not work on xbox one. Require "arcade"/casual games to be written in dotnet with no assembly, or require publishers to provide source code escrow. I don't care if they cost more to accomplish this.

    102. Re:Damage control by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Article said you can use phone to phone home.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    103. Re:Damage control by MacTO · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is, it isn't just a rural thing. Some cities have very poor broadband, and even major urban centres can have dodgy internet in some neighbourhoods. That's particularly true of older neighbourhoods and outlying areas. So I'd suggest that your minority isn't as small as many people think. (And it always seems to be authentication/activation services that have issues timing out, even when web based services are chugging along.)

    104. Re:Damage control by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Will any sufficiently smart phone do, or does it require Windows Phone? Or (more likely) will this be an under-documented "feature" of Smart Glass?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    105. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i saw it called "xbone" on tumblr the other day

    106. Re: Damage control by ldobehardcore · · Score: 1

      Also, you have to pay every time you pick up a friend. And you aren't allowed to drive it out of state, or pickup someone from out of state.

      OnStar is pretty much a 1:1 equivalence though.

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    107. Re:Damage control by anarcobra · · Score: 1

      I liked the dreamcast a lot.
      Some of my favorite games are still those on dreamcast.

    108. Re:Damage control by ttucker · · Score: 1

      There are Kickstarter consoles still on the drawing board, I mean, not even prototypes available yet, that have more pre-orders than the XBone.

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

      Citation badly needed.

      Well, since you were a bit non-specific on what you're feeling butthurt about [...]

      On the topic of who is being a whiny prick, I would say perhaps to think hard about it. Also, the linked console is not in even the same category as an XBOX... compare it to the gaming power of a tablet.

    109. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall."

      Oh fuck me, why does this come up time and time again? Have you all had lobotomies or something?

      Yes the XBox One is a colossal DRM fuckup but how does switching to Steam help exactly? Sure you only have to check in once every 3 months instead of once every 24 hours but you have even less second hand resale rights than the XBox One allows for crying out loud.

      I just can't get my head round this "XBox One DRM sucks, use Steam!" mentality when Steam has been doing what the XBox One does since day 1 and gives you even less second hand resale rights.

      Are you really all this retarded or is it simply that it's just a good excuse to play the PC vs. Console fanboy card? Do you really not see the utter hypocrisy of your argument? Are you that oblivious to the obviousness that's right in front of your face?

      Right now it seems even the PS4 is going to give you more freedom than Steam does because it'll require no check-in and place no limitations on second hand sales. If you're saying people should PC game instead of console game then say that, say what you fucking mean rather than playing the fanboy card whilst trying to disguise it as some kind of argument about DRM which makes literally no sense because you're opting for a system that has just as bad DRM and always has.

    110. Re:Damage control by Xest · · Score: 1

      This hasn't changed. The XBox 360 had a 2mb broadband connection as a minimum requirement for Gold, it's really not a new thing.

      It was there not because it was required for any kind of DRM but because half the things you'd do on Live like online gaming and video streaming need that as a minimum nowadays.

    111. Re:Damage control by Xest · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference saying the world isn't actually made a chocolate ice cream and that you're just perceiving the whole of reality incorrectly in your mind?

      Obviously you don't, so it must be true.

      As GP said, citation needed or stop making shit up because it discredits your whole argument.

    112. Re:Damage control by Narishma · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the 360 didn't require a Gold subscription to function. It was only needed to do online stuff.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    113. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed his point. If you're gonna go for an always online solution you might as well go with Steam instead.

    114. Re:Damage control by Xest · · Score: 1

      Neither does the new console.

      The point is that the DRM phone home will work on less than broadband (at least, there's no reason why it wouldn't), but the broadband minimum requirement is there to make use of half the features of what is ultimately a connected device. Like with Diablo 3 and the new Sim City they want to do online processing.

      Or in other words, the DRM argument is completely separate from the broadband argument. The broadband thing is an issue when consuming any modern online content whatever device you do it on.

    115. Re:Damage control by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, you're also a DRM-supporting imbecile.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    116. Re:Damage control by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that XBone is bad

      No, it is.

      it's that the PS4 is much better

      Sony isn't much better, and the console is still closed-down.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    117. Re:Damage control by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      It takes one to know one.

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    118. Re:Damage control by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      If the Ouya were just by itself, your prediction might come true. However the hardware of the Ouya is inconsequential, the real value is the Android ecosystem. All of the games and apps will transfer from Ouya to your phone or tablet to the Nvidia Shield or the Gamestick or any other Android capable machine.

    119. Re:Damage control by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I don't have that per se, but:

      Q: Can I party chat or game chat between Xbox One and Xbox 360 Live users?
      A: No. Because the new services of Xbox Live and the all new Kinect were designed to power next generation experiences (not compatible with Xbox 360), party chat and game chat will not be available between Xbox One and Xbox 360 Live members.

      So best encourage all your friends to buy an XBone or you won't be playing each other!

    120. Re:Damage control by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Oh! Found this:

      Q: Why require Kinect with every Xbox One?
      A: The all new Kinect is now an essential and integrated part of the platform. By having it as a consistent part of every Xbox One, game and entertainment creators can build experiences that assume the availability of voice, gesture and natural sensing, leading to unrivaled ease of use, premium experiences and interactivity for consumers.

      Certainly sounds like the system will not be happy if the Kinect is disabled.

    121. Re:Damage control by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, except for the fact that they've stated that they will release an unlock if at all possible if the company ever goes out of business. And the fact that Steam DRM is ridiculously easy to crack and they have not made any real effort to improve it except from the multiplayer security aspect. Which is almost certainly because they both know that stopping pirates is ineffectual and it will allow people to continue playing games if anything catastrophic happens to Valve.

    122. Re:Damage control by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      GT6 is on PS3. You'll have to wait for GT7 to see how the PS4 performs. Of course, it'll be still be interesting to see which actual performs the driving aspect better.

    123. Re:Damage control by loufoque · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The Dreamcast is one of the best consoles of all time.

    124. Re:Damage control by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But the Ouya is in a weird space, somewhere outside the standard Android ecosystem. It doesn't come with the Google Play store, and any games in their store must come with some kind of free version. Personally, I think pushing free on people is what's making a lot of bad games. Most of the games that I really like on my Android are not games that had any free version whatsoever. There's a few good free games I've tried. Most of the in between stuff, the games that start out free and then try to get you to give them money by paying to level up faster or even just paying to remove annoying advertisements are terrible, and seem to be interested in making money than in making the game enjoyable to play.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    125. Re:Damage control by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I tend to want to use a product I pay for in the way I normally do. And I don't think the vendor has the right to tell me I cannot if he doesn't so please, or retract it, even for a refund.

      I bought it, you sold it, it's MINE to use. If you don't agree to this contract, I will not buy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    126. Re:Damage control by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we entertain MS on their way to the graveyard. When you get there, tell the Dreamcast we said "hi".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    127. Re: Damage control by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And it only runs on domestic fuel. No cheap filling up 'cross the border.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    128. Re:Damage control by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Care to cite ANY game that is fun AND needs to "see" you?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    129. Re:Damage control by ilguido · · Score: 2

      Are you aware that the Xbox One is thought to have grave manufacturing problems and that it will be available in only 21 countries at launch, missing all Asia?

    130. Re:Damage control by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      DDoSed? Like, say, when everyone and their dog gets the new game and connects to them at the same time?

      For reference, look at ... hell, any game with that always-on crap in the more recent past and the disaster that ensued every time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    131. Re:Damage control by ilguido · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bought Crusader Kings II on Steam and installed it on my laptop. Then I copied its directory to my desktop computer where Steam is not installed and I played it there since. Do that with a XBone.

    132. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butthurt? Wow, you take trolling to a new level of nasty. Ok, fine, STUPID CUNT-BITCH, I'll take it even lower. The only reason you like that console is because Julie Uhrman, founder and CEO of Ouya, is a fellow lesbian and you'd love to chow down on that crusty muff.

    133. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds will rage against DRM all day, yet they love Steam....

    134. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF does your post have to do with his question?

    135. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right! I love how easy it is to lend games on Steam, and the used game market for it is the best around!

    136. Re:Damage control by aepervius · · Score: 1

      Quote: Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

      Normally I'd snark this, but I got nothing. I mean, I'm just bone dry here. It's so stupidifying that I think it may have temporarily caused my brain to seize up like an old VW bug. /Quote


      it appears to be paradoxical, unless you realize that a lot of us do not have wifi, and jsut *one* internet cable. In my case for example the basic DSL modem I have got has a cat 5 cable linked to my PC. I literally cannot connect a console unless I physically either add a wifi router, or physically remove the connection from the PC and put it in the console.

      Therefore I can connect to steam but cannot connect to anything on my console. It isn't a rare situation either, although now the trend by ISP is to provide for free a wifi DSL modem router, it was not the case years ago.

      --
      C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
      visit randi.org
    137. Re:Damage control by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not so bad on Steam because AAA games get down to £4.99 within a year or two so loss of resale value and actual ownership rights isn't so big a deal. I'd certainly never pay full price for something on there though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    138. Re:Damage control by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. My brother lives in one of the most densely populated cities in the UK but doesn't have broadband. He could get it but doesn't want to pay for it when he can just tether his phone and rely on his data contract. I'm sure there are lots of young people like him who want an XBone but don't want to commit to a monthly contract due to job insecurity and a desire to limit their fixed outgoings.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    139. Re:Damage control by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Virgin Media recently had a five day outage round here, and my boss was telling me that his kids went nuts. No cable TV, no cable internet. At least they had their XBOX 360 to play with...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    140. Re:Damage control by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem with PC games is the horrible, horrible DRM. At least with a console's DRM you know what you are getting and it doesn't break the machine. With PC game DRM often you get a rootkit and sometimes your machine doesn't boot after installation. They force you to join some stupid "rockstar social club" and won't let you play if you have DVD duplication software installed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    141. Re:Damage control by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

      The webcam on these other things doesn't disable the gear if you block it. If the XBone webcam is obstructed the games will not play. Remembering to block the cam before putting her jammies on is more than I expect from my daughters, and more than I expect to need to.

      That's a blatant lie. A) The CAMERA is not always on ever, especially not by default, so when the system's off the camera's off and B) the MIC is always listening for "Xbox on" assumedly by default (will probably change to an option with factory default = off), but MS has explicitly said that you can turn that setting off

    142. Re:Damage control by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      You can lend/sell used steam games?

    143. Re:Damage control by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

      Lots of people are pissed over the price...

      ^This. Price is so much more important to the average consumer than "I have to plug this thing into my modem/router? OK." If the PS4's Eye was a mandatory bundle with the PS4, the price difference wouldn't be that big of a deal at $40ish; but the full $100 difference will definitely push a lot of consumers to the PS4, especially considering that neither one will let you play your current game library at launch.

    144. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the GP wasn't talking about the Steam app per se, but the limitations involved for playing games on it and sharing games with friends - which, if you think about it, are pretty much the same as the XBone (or worse, because on steam you can't "lend" or give away games at all); they just happen to be on PC, and it seems to have enjoyed a moderate popularity despite the freedom of true ownership it takes away.

    145. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam isn't really much of a hassle when it comes to phoning home. Once games are installed and ready to play you can run Steam in Offline mode forever. So as far as DRM goes, Steam itself is not too shabby. Of course there are games on there that have their own DRM on top, though they are just big name titles mostly. As for selling games, it's something I've never bothered doing anyway, I still have all my PS1 and N64 games, so Steam lacking that feature isn't going to drive me away any time soon.

    146. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The dreamcast owned well and long after it "failed". It failed because its best virtue was also its achilles heel; you could easily pirate all the games.

      It also failed because it never got sufficient initial sales numbers to survive. We all know that Sony knowingly posted fraudulent benchmarks just prior to its release. Everyone who was paying attention at the time literally knows numerous people who literally had the cash for the DC in hand and decided to wait for the PS2.

      The DC was boned in both directions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    147. Re:Damage control by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I saw it referenced that way after the pre-E3 'it will play TV!' showing MS did for the xbox one and the name was announced. This went with the 'mostly on' locked down DRM scheme that they announced at the same time, but just couldn't get their collective stories straight.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    148. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Running Steam isn't much of a hassle now.

      I have a crappy connection so I don't want to share it with Steam. So I was trying to get TF2 by firing it up occasionally. But they've been updating TF2 and the updates are apparently not incremental. And apparently, if an update comes out, it just stops the old download but leaves the package files lying around. I don't know if it will ever do anything with them because I uninstalled Steam and deleted all its data files when I found that it had downloaded twenty gigabytes of game install packages and still was showing me under fifty percent completed. The whole game is only a couple gigabytes. Steam is a piece of shit, running it is an enormous hassle, fuck Steam and everyone who created it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    149. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Fuck off.

    150. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      it appears to be paradoxical, unless you realize that a lot of us do not have wifi, and jsut *one* internet cable.

      well no. Virtually everyone has WiFi and multiple ethernet ports on the back of their ISP-supplied router. Only a small handful of people who are on a WISP or similar are in the situation you are in. And most of us are capable of installing a wireless router, which you can get at a yard sale for ten dollars or so.

      It isn't a rare situation either, although now the trend by ISP is to provide for free a wifi DSL modem router, it was not the case years ago.

      Although years ago it was expensive to add a wireless router, it is not the case today.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    151. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Fuck me sideways, it's proved.

      you must have a hard time breathing with microsofts Dick obstructing your esophagus.

    152. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      daily checkins are fine, but only disable playing if it's been ~4 weeks since a successful checkin. Broadband outages happen, and that's exaclty when you want to churn through the latest RPG because you can't do your "normal" entertainment things.

      Defeats the purpose of checkins if the delay is that long. Anything more than about 72 hours would be worthless.

      -if I have a disk in my hand, I should be able to play that game single player offline, regardless of having a net connection/whether it's used or new/etc.

      Amen. This is one of the biggest reasons why Steam is evil.

      If this system is all about advantages, I should be able to lend a game to anyone "digitally" without cost nor effort.

      You can if they're one of your ten friends. You're not allowed to have more than ten friends. But the ten friends don't have to literally be family members, they can be anyone you name.

      GUARANTEE ALL DIGITAL DELIVERY GAMES WILL WORK ON FUTURE "xbox" CONSOLES.

      It just doesn't work that way.

      I don't care if they cost more to accomplish this.

      You are not getting a guarantee. There's only two ways to accomplish this faithfully. One is to include the prior console inside the new console. This has occasionally been possible, but it's over now. The other is to use an interpreted language or at least a VM for all the games. Either approach has significant costs of one kind or another, either in performance or in software maintenance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    153. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      PS3 was so legendary a departure from the common platform that the US Navy used it for supercompute

      Unfortunately, that didn't actually make it any better for gaming, and it sure didn't make it any better for writing games for. It didn't actually deliver anything to gamers that they weren't getting with the competitor, and in fact it ultimately did a lot less, lest we forget Kinect.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    154. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running Steam isn't a big issue, and you can still play most of your games with no internet connection(I'm unaware of any 'always on' titles, but I haven't been paying much attention).

      Also, the DRM on steam is something you should look into. The way they do it, every title must have DRM ranging from bare bones(ie, almost no drm), to more extreme options(limited installs, etc). Last time I really looked into it, most titles took a minimalistic approach. It's also worth noting that even on the heavier cases of DRM, Steam mitigates a lot of the problems by letting you reclaim installations(network connection necessary, obviously). It's not perfect, but it's a long way from forcing everything to be always-on.

    155. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked this is marked 'informative' Steam does *not* require an internet connection(or perhaps you don't understand 'offline mode'). Also, your Steam account can be banned from playing certain games, such as a FPS when you've been caught using an aimbot or other hack, but that doesn't mean your Steam account is shut down. I have yet to hear of a case where someone's account was closed.

    156. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aim boys on consoles! What about all that bullshit xbots like to spew about how pc gaming sucks because of haxors! And how it's not possible on ze console

    157. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have come to the conclusion that PC gaming is best done on a machine with drive sleds. One drive per game, or perhaps publisher. Clone your install to another disk, boot from it, install your game. Done and done. Used disks are everywhere, cheap, big enough to do this job.

      This is also by far the best way to multiboot; no chance of windows fucking tux in the ear while you're trying to diddle your MBR or something.

      I'm majorly over running Windows as my desktop OS. It's better in some ways, but I have removed whole classes of headache from my life. Seriously, I almost get a headache just thinking about how many. I have done literally one complete reinstall since Ubuntu Dapper. If I had been running Windows, how many reinstalls do you think I'd have done in that time? Because the truth is that it's just not worth understanding why Windows is failing unless you have dozens of machines failing in the same way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    158. Re:Damage control by Major+Ralph · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that taylor swift "raid" was set up by 4chan, and to the best of my knowledge they did no such thing for the xbone vs ps4 poll.

      --
      I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
    159. Re:Damage control by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 2

      I think it's a perfectly valid comparison based on the changing nature of gaming anyway. When the PS3 and XBox 360 were released, there was no such thing as Kickstarter projects, the whole commercial PC games scene was much more vibrant with fewer independent releases, and whilst Steam did exist then, there was no thought about making it available for Linux.

      The need for closed and specialised hardware these days is lessening, whether it's for telephony servers (the industry I work in) or for gaming. Mobile gaming has meant that the general populace is once again becoming comfortable with small games that don't necessarily have the greatest 3D graphics, retrogaming is enjoying an upsurge and the indie and "less commercial" gaming community is becoming huge with the likes of Steam, Desura and Good Old Games offering games distribution models.

      It's now a reasonably straightforward task to buy a cheap "computer on a board", throw on a free Linux build and make a proof-of-concept gaming console (or anything else you can think of), I think it's an extremely dangerous time for Sony or Microsoft to be releasing new consoles.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    160. Re:Damage control by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

      You can run your Steam games in offline mode. Always works for me, at least.

    161. Re:Damage control by leonardluen · · Score: 2

      and when the XBone is released...they will still have the XBox 360 to play with!

    162. Re: Damage control by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The non-gaming features are handled by devices that people already own, such as cable boxes, smart TVs, or set top boxes like Roku or Apple TV. The people that rely on those devices don't need an XBox in the first place. I enjoy getting Netflix and videos on my 360, but that is only a side benefit to it being a gaming console.

    163. Re:Damage control by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, "old fashioned way"? You make it sound like a bad thing...

      I've gamed regularly for over 30 years of my life and never once felt the inclination to own a console. Every since I've started gaming I've done it on platforms where I can take software and games from just about any source I like and play them. I can choose to go buy certain games, others I could play legally as free/shareware/open source games. Just because they may not have the latest 3D graphics or multi-million dollar development budgets does not mean that for what they are they are less immersive or engaging.

      If consoles work for you and others then go knock yourself out. But take the blinkers off and don't just assume that because others get their gaming fixes by not doing it on consoles means that they are either less serious gamers or don't get as much fun out of it - even for an "old timer" like me, it's as much fun as it ever was... if anything, the vibrant indie game and retro gaming scene is creating a return to the "Golden Age Of Computers" where there is far more choice than ever to get a gaming fix.

      I couldn't think of anything *WORSE* for my gaming fun than tying myself to one platform where games releases only happen because the games developers are licensed by the manufacturer to release those games...

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    164. Re:Damage control by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      At least diablo had a tenuous reason for the always on connection, the real money auction house.

      EA's latest Sim City on the other hand was a bigger fiasco, and had no real reason at all for requiring the always on connection.

    165. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.videogamer.com/news/xbox_one_24-hour_check-in_using_mobile_phone_uses_kilobytes_of_data_says_harrison.html It just says that it sends so little data it won't effect your phone bill. I'm guessing you have to be able to teather is all.

    166. Re:Damage control by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Popular internet polls are as reliable as astrology.

      Not true. Astrology will vary between readings and individuals.

      Responses from the internet will always trend toward maximum Lulz.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    167. Re:Damage control by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And Taylor Swift was sent to a school for the deaf...

      Sounds pretty reliable to me.

    168. Re:Damage control by Jiro · · Score: 1

      If the company goes out of business, the bankruptcy court controls what the company does. They are allowed to break contracts, and certainly break non-contract gentleman's agreements like the "promise" to unlock your games. The bankruptcy court may very well decide all the company's money goes to creditors and none to pay for programmers, servers, or beta-testers for the unlock.

      Any promise "if we go out of business, we will..." is legally worthless.

    169. Re: Damage control by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Launch titles never really show off a machine. Or at least it's happened that way a lot in the past. Just look at the difference between Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario Bros. 3.

      The fact is, we don't need a new console. But the big 3 have all realized they can force obsolescence by just refusing to publish any more titles for the old console. Even the original Wii would still have some life left in it. Nintendo only makes one standard Mario platform game per console, so to get New Super Mario Bros. U, you have to buy the new machine. Terrible policy.

    170. Re:Damage control by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 1

      They haven't made any effort to improve their DRM because the company is not run by MBAs and bean counters. The company has a flat structure with no bosses so the person doing the work is the person deciding to do the work.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    171. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBone has been being used since as soon as the name was revealed.

    172. Re:Damage control by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Keeping in mind that people have gotten the latest Sim City to process on a home PC without requiring any additional help from the servers by simply activating a debug mode. I know it's nit-picking, but I'm still kind of holding a grudge about that whole thing.

      Other than that, I agree. If you can at least phone home without needing broadband then they're separate arguments, even though I'm not fond at all about the way they've implemented DRM.

    173. Re:Damage control by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Citation needed about that.

      The Kinect is required because they want to encourage game devs to use the Kinect. If it were optional, developers may skip using some features since they may not be available. I don't see how it won't work if cam is obstructed.

      http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/156515-kinect-for-xbox-one-an-always-on-works-in-the-dark-camera-and-microphone-what-could-possibly-go-wrong

      It may continue to work if you obstruct the camera - but should you have to bother?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    174. Re:Damage control by adolf · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: Bankruptcy is not the only process by which companies go out of business.

    175. Re:Damage control by TrollheartBlue · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that it only needs to phone in once every three months. I can't believe antdude's statement is marked as more informative than yours. People need to realize Steam and Xbone, though similar are actually quite different with different contexts.

      --
      Hey, look at me! My opinion is valid because I found a website that says the same thing.
    176. Re:Damage control by Clsid · · Score: 1

      I think you fail to realize that there should be more options available to you as a consumer. On one side we have publishers like EA becoming distributors, on the other you have steam which is the defacto store for new digital games. GOG is mostly for nostalgia games if you haven't checked. Hell, even Apple couldn't pull it off with books. And if you translate what is happening with video games distribution to other forms of arts like books, music and paintings, I believe it will be easier for you to understand my point.

    177. Re:Damage control by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Except it's factually correct, nor is it a "silly remark" considering what MS is trying to pull.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    178. Re:Damage control by dkf · · Score: 1

      Some cities have very poor broadband, and even major urban centres can have dodgy internet in some neighbourhoods. That's particularly true of older neighbourhoods and outlying areas.

      So it would seem that the real thing to do in those areas is to give the incumbents (political and corporate) a kick up the backside and get someone in who's actually willing do what it takes to FIX IT instead of wringing their hands and pretending it's all so hard that it is impossible. You know and I know that's just bullcrap; fixing infrastructure isn't rocket science.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    179. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, they are pissing people off by going way out of their way to combat piracy (cloud saves, online checkin, etc) and then callit the XBone... As in skull and crossbones...

    180. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must connect to the internet once a day or locks you out, extreme limitations on lending or buying used games, etc. An excellent reason to play Steam games under Linux overall.

      I admit I could be incorrect here, but doesn't Steam also require you to connect to the internet; and, I might have missed it, but where on Steam can one lend or buy used games?

      And, do you really think Steam's going to magically turn Linux into the gaming platform its failed to be for the past 20 years?

    181. Re:Damage control by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      As someone said above, they seem to have forgotten what the relationship between the producer and consumer is supposed to be about.

    182. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      recoiledsnake down below states that the Amazon poll was raided by Reddit.

    183. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Does it seem dumb to anyone else that they're releasing it in Q4 2013 but they aren't porting it to PS4? I mean I know racing games aren't as sexy or important as most other genres, but there ARE strong fans and it doesn't make much sense to not even have a port planned.

    184. Re:Damage control by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      Correct, it had more to do with general distrust with Sega for releasing three(!) pieces of hardware and abandoning them shortly afterwards. The Dreamcast was different but few would take that risk after hearing about the recent history of Sega hardware. There were lots of factors, but this was the one that ensured Sega leaving the hardware business.

    185. Re:Damage control by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Meh. It's cheaper than a PS3. Adjusted for inflation it's cheaper than an Xbox 360 would have been at launch with Kinect. The only real issue with the price IMO is what you get in comparison to the PS4.

    186. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the times when 74MB was more than an order of magnitude larger than the entirety of main memory on a computer, also the times when 74MB was larger than any hard drive of the day.

    187. Re:Damage control by webheaded · · Score: 1

      I always see people here complain about Steam always running and I wonder what the hell kind of machines they're running. If you have a gaming rig at this point you have at the VERY least, 4gb of memory. Most of us have 8gb of more. That piddly little
      Personally I like as much Steam integration as I can get. Using Steam as a backend for multiplayer is awesome. Steam achievements too. It's like its own little console that allows me to still run mods and shit. They have outrageous sales constantly and if I really need to, I can use offline mode. It's not perfect but I generally don't HAVE to use it if I don't want to. Steam is something I WANT to use because it adds value for me.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    188. Re:Damage control by dywolf · · Score: 1

      steam has offline mode that works.

      "your steam" doesnt get closed down such that you "lose all your games". steam is an online store combined with a online backup service and a front end that handles the installation and downloading for you.

      you're right about selling/transfering games, but thats a minor caveat when talking about digital distribution rather than physical media. its one thing to trade a disc around, another to trade an abstract virtual item.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    189. Re:Damage control by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Citation needed about that.

      The Kinect is required because they want to encourage game devs to use the Kinect. If it were optional, developers may skip using some features since they may not be available. I don't see how it won't work if cam is obstructed.

      Well, shit. Then perhaps they should have considered the privacy implications of mandating a 1984-style (well even more advanced actually) system as a requirement for their console shouldn't they?

      The fact that they're still sticking to this as a *requirement* for playing games is pretty telling of their attitude... which is not respectful to their customers.

      Go ahead, buy the XBone - I'll wait out this "show my kids dressing up in the living room to an always-on big brother" fad.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    190. Re:Damage control by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, if Steam bans your account, players can still play their games?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    191. Re:Damage control by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

      Meh. It's cheaper than a PS3. Adjusted for inflation it's cheaper than an Xbox 360 would have been at launch with Kinect. The only real issue with the price IMO is what you get in comparison to the PS4.

      And adjusted for inflation a gallon of gas should have cost $3.11 when the 360 was released, but it didn't. It cost $2.20. You can't use inflation to justify a single good's price change. That's not how it works or how it's intended to be used. Plus, why compare present to past when you have a perfectly good present to present comparison to make? The fact is an XBO will cost 25% more than a PS4 (minus a PS Eye). Each consumer is going to have to make up his/her own mind as to whether or not it's worth that 25% higher price tag.

    192. Re: Damage control by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

      Also the facts that A) it does not ban game lending and B) the Kinect is only always-on by default and can, in fact, be turned off.

    193. Re:Damage control by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Ha! My Dreamcast still works, and I still play SoulCalibur on it. Any guesses how long XB1 will continue to function after MS end-of-life's it?

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    194. Re:Damage control by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that a simultaneous launch in 21 countries is huge for a new game console? The Xbox 360 launched in *2* countries (US and Canada), but over the year expanded to 36. the PS3 similarly launched in only a few countries (primarily Japan and US) and didn't even make it to Europe at all for another 5 months.

      And the reason for not launching initially in Asia isn't manufacturing problems, it's because they are still working on the Kinect voice recognition. They aren't going to launch anywhere Kinect won't work, which may slow down adding new regions but they are considering Kinect integral to the console this time...

    195. Re:Damage control by ilguido · · Score: 1

      Try harder, it's going to launch in Brazil, but not in Portugal and I seriously doubt that Kinect will get to work with Russian/Finnish/Norwegian (which is just a continuum of dialects) languages at all during its lifetime. So, no, it's not Kinect the cause of the 1 year delay in Asia.

    196. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just bone dry here..

      Are you sure you don't mean you're XBone dry?

    197. Re: Damage control by gagol · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, emulators will be much easier to write since they are going for what is essentially a pc platfom...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    198. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You forget that the people buying XBox watch TV commercials and that their competitor is the root-kit maker Sony.

      You forgot that Sony doesn't have commercials for their rootkits.

      This will hurt the XBox One like the rootkit fiasco or dropping Linux PS2 support hurt Sony --- this amount precisely and scientifically stated as "none at all".

      Mainstream comedians are making jokes about the XBone. Stick a fork in it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    199. Re:Damage control by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      She's more about the visual than the audio anyway.

    200. Re:Damage control by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Still have one, still gets played.

    201. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Requiring a demo for every game make great sense. It means that people will actually have a chance to find out what makes the system good. Locking the game down to one level, or a certain amount of progression or whatever ought to be easy for any competent developer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    202. Re:Damage control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: Bankruptcy is not the only process by which companies go out of business.

      Right, sometimes they get bought out and then someone else owns all their IP and makes all the decisions.

      Corporations are forever.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    203. Re:Damage control by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Well, the article you posted does hint at it: ...Asia, said the company was working on ensuring a “great experience for customers” in the region, including offering localized content.

      And Brazilian Portuguese (pt-BR) may be supported, but not European Portuguese (pt-PT). The recognition is different enough that they need to customize it for each dialect, and the Brazilian market is much bigger. Same way American, British, and Australian English are all separate engines, as is Canadian French vs "continental" French.

      Also, something like 95%+ Danes, 85%+ Nords, and 75%+ Finns under 60 speak fairly fluent English - they are probably just be using the English engine there. The same is not true in Asia. I don't know about Russia - it's very possible they have developed an engine for Russian since it's a big market as well (and as we all know Russian fighter planes stolen by Clint Eastwood in the 80's already supported thinking in Russian, so voice should be no problem ;)

      There is an engine for Japanese, so either they are working on improving it or they just don't feel they have enough Japanese-focused content for a launch yet (which is what the article you referenced basically says anyway). But even if it's not *just* Kinect support (but a combination of Kinect and other content support in the relevant languages) that still doesn't support your claim that it's due to manufacturing issues.

    204. Re:Damage control by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Crack the game before running it then. DRM removal tools are freely available.

    205. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this system is all about advantages, I should be able to lend a game to anyone "digitally" without cost nor effort. "lend game to Jimmy for 30 days" and it disables the license on my xbox. After 30 days it reverts back, and I can continue lending it or not. I am fine if I cannot play the game while it's "lent".

      Why worry about disabling licenses? Being able to e-lend a game to a buddy is amazing, and probably a sure way to generate an extra sale without the inconvenience of not being able to play the game. I could see people being apprehensive about e-lending if their game became unplayable during that duration.

      Why not set it up where you can e-lend a copy of your game to one friend for x amount of time, and when that expires you can e-lend it to another friend? If that friend got hooked on the game, they're likely to buy it after that, and you're free to e-lend your game to another friend and possibly generate another sale.

    206. Re:Damage control by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Steam used to be a lot worse, too. IIRC, it had some memory leaks that (rightfully) gave it a bad reputation. Right now, it's sitting in the background taking up 16MB of RAM, which, yes, used to be a ton of memory but now is an insignificant fraction that will not impact my performance in the slightest.

    207. Re:Damage control by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >I think you fail to realize that there should be more options available to you as a consumer. On one side we have publishers like EA becoming distributors,

      Actually, I'm kind of pissed off about Origin. If EA sold its games on both Origin and on Steam, I wouldn't have a problem - between all the different digital distribution platforms (Stardock, etc.) you can often find sales for games you want to play. But Origin just fractures my games library into two different places, two different sets of friends lists that can send invites when I'm in some other game because they don't know I'm busy doing something else, and so forth.

      I bought ME3 just to finish the trilogy, but have not bought a single other game on Origin and am happy with keeping it that way.

    208. Re:Damage control by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I dont play online, i prefer my online gaming on a PC and my solo play on a console. i dont want my console hooked to the net. so i am out of luck if i want one of these things

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    209. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      whaa?? it's fine if you just want to play solo, but what's the big whoop about hooking the console to the internet? you're so veemently against the idea that you'd rather not get one at a lll? this sisms very strong overraction, dontchatink?

    210. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only requires internet to download the game from the servers from then on you can play the game offline. Whereas the XBone you need to call home everyday.

    211. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You always bring up irrelevant aspects when you don't have anything of value to say, just in order to further your pro-Microsoft agenda?

      Don't bother answering. It's obvious to everyone that the answer is yes.

      Let me be clear: If I ever had the intention of buying this "new" thing from Microsoft, posts from people like you have made me change my mind. You are achieving the opposite of what you want. Good job.

    212. Re:Damage control by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      The main reason is i do most my console gaming in locations that do not have net access.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    213. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Like where? You mean parts of the house that don't have inet, or rural unconnected areas?

    214. Re:Damage control by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Yes and I found the always on requirement for Diablo 3 intensely annoying because it meant I couldn't play it when I was on the train, in spite of the fact that it has a single player mode. Fortunately, intense annoyance turned to intense boredom after about two or three weeks and I no longer had the desire to play it on the train.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    215. Re: Damage control by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Or sell or lend out anything you carry in it.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    216. Re:Damage control by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Your ignorance is showing. Anybody with a clue knows Dreamcast was SEGA, not Sony.

    217. Re:Damage control by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      rural unconnected areas

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    218. Re: Damage control by ShadowFoxx · · Score: 1

      Your information unfortunately is completely inaccurate. While I agree with your sentiments that the drm comments were and are unsatisfactory, when you attempt to flame bait at least use facts. For instance Xbox1 is already sold out of initial units on amazon as oppose to your completely inaccurate grindings about no one wanting to purchase them.

    219. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      whydon't you get a freedompop wifi/cellular box. it's free for under 500MB. you can turn it on when the xbone needs to phone home. problem solved!

    220. Re:Damage control by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're very probably in the majority, and there are billions of "you."

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    221. Re:Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dreamcast was reincarnated as your smart phone; A fancy embedded ARM/PowerVR combo.

    222. Re:Damage control by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      because i shouldnt have to do any of that to play a single play game by myself. Cell signal in the place i tend to be when im gaming is non existent even if i thought that was a "real" answer, which i dont.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    223. Re:Damage control by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      where do you game? a dungeon in the middle of nowhere where you can smoke your ganga?

    224. Re:Damage control by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Stardock isn't a digital distribution platform. You're thinking of (*shudder*) Gamestop.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    225. Re: Damage control by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Try that when your internet spontaneously fails. Steam requires you to be online to go offline.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    226. Re: Damage control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does no one state the obvious? Internet connected device that doesn't allow you control and can see anything in the room [surveillance]. TV's now can do that and can hear what you say? You do know that the NSA has a liaison in Microsoft don't you?

    227. Re:Damage control by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >Stardock isn't a digital distribution platform. You're thinking of (*shudder*) Gamestop.

      Same thing. Stardock sold Impulse to Gamestop.

      My point is that I place value in having one centralized location for my digital games. As long as Steam doesn't charge more for their games than the other digital download venues, I will continue to buy everything through them. I hate having multiple clients and multiple friends lists, etc., open at once.

  2. Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For some of us, you've already lost the sale. Always on internet is a killer for many of us, since it's mostly taking away our freedom.

    Fuck Xbox One.

    1. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by VortexCortex · · Score: 3

      Are you happy about paying for XBL just so the machine you bought can utilize the Internet you pay for to verify you're not a criminal when you try to play the games you pay for?

    2. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2, Informative

      link or gtfo? i don't think you need XBL for the phone home functionality.

    3. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be missing the point... Too much I, me, my...

      I will not buy it. Period. Same reason I won't buy Sim City 5.

      So please don't include me in your "don't think many people" assessment. "Always on" is an abomination that needs to be killed. Why remove ALL CHOICE from those who don't want it?

    4. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely spun. That's perfectly right, little consumers, the device in your living room which watches everything you do and reports back to its mother servers every day on a PRISM laden network is perfectly benign. Oh, and all those 'pay per level' fractional download content subscription monitization schemes that you love to hate, here is a whole entire 'clouded' up console built fundamentally on them! You still get to pay 59.99 per game mind you, we'll just automagically grant you access to it, don't worry about it, we never forget anything, and our technology never goes wrong,

      Our marketing team swears to you that nothing could possibly go wrong!

    5. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, most people have internet and it won't really matter. However, as it was discussed at my work today being in the military, if we are deployed or on a ship your console is now dead weight because you're sure as hell not getting internet access for your Xbox. If your fortunate to be somewhere not getting shot to shit and have power and downtime anyway. Everyone who does buy consoles basically decided fuck you Microsoft, no sale until you fix it. And they will once they get enough bad PR.

    6. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly will be buying a XBOXONE. I think the price difference for having the Kinect will pay off very well. Because this is integral part of the device, it will have applications developed using its capabilities. It will enhance and enable many new genre of games.

      Also, the 24h license check can work out great for me (its not always internet connected). If this allows me to share my library, loan games with my kids and friends who live across the country - this is great feature. This DRM is way more friendly than what you find with Apple store, Google play or indeed Steam (whom many in this forum will also praise).

      When they shut down the servers and leave you with an unusable piece of hardware you deserve exactly what you got.

    7. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some people might even believe you are serious! The box will know when you walk in the room and track you as you move about, watching your eye movements to know when you watch commercials and when you don't, and you think this is a good plan? Right.

    8. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Mark4ST · · Score: 1

      Yeah... how am I going to use this where there is no internet? Like on a boat at sea, or down a mineshaft? OR A RURAL AREA?

    9. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      For some of us, you've already lost the sale. Always on internet is a killer for many of us, since it's mostly taking away our freedom.

      You're kidding right? The current generation's mantra is "They can take away our freedom, but they'll never take away our always-connected internet!"

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    10. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You pretty much make the point why the XBone should be avoided when you said "It won't prevent me from playing as often as I like as long as the servers are always working..."

      I'm happy to pay $100 more for the new Kinect
      I'm not! $100 just so I can wave my hand to switch channels?

    11. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fuck Xbox One.

      And what a great time, coincidentally, for there to be a renaissance in PC gaming.

      Now having had a peek at the next-gen consoles, I realize I've never been happier about being a PC gamer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      PlaysForSure

    13. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by JMJimmy · · Score: 0

      500gb disc will get eaten up in no time. You'll be micromanaging your installs/DLC before you hit 50 games - I currently have over 700 xbox 360 games and can't even fit the DLC/GoD/XBLA across 640gb.

      Spending more time installing/deleting is a stupid idea - one of the reasons I went for 360 instead of PS3, I could just put it in and play where the PS3 could take up to 2 hours to download system updates/install/download game updates/etc. before you could actually play the game.

      Xbox Lame One is a failure through and through.

    14. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      No, I did my research and found it was a piece of shit.

      2 different government agencies are already investigating them for violations of the competition act and the consumer protection act.

      And so what, now I need to buy an expensive external hdd on top of the console purchase to be able to store the games, except that for them to run properly they'll have to be on the main drive so it'll be moving content back and forth constantly. Sounds like a wonderful experience.

      There are so many things wrong with it and their policies that I wouldn't use one if it were free.

    15. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by readingaccount · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You pretty much make the point why the XBone should be avoided when you said "It won't prevent me from playing as often as I like as long as the servers are always working..."

      This, THIS, THIS is why I have a problem with Internet-based DRM. It creates an artificial lifetime on a product where there doesn't need to be one. The ability to run the product is tied to the ability to authenticate against a server somewhere, which introduces so many points of failure (your net connection, the state of the remote server, the state of your account, etc).

      If the product is considered out of maintenance and the authentication servers are taken offline, you're fucked. The vendor MIGHT patch out the requirement for authentication later (if they haven't disappeared entirely), but there's no guarantee they will, compared to something without DRM in which you don't have any need for stress in the first place.

      Going towards an increasing level of restriction of consumer rights and a locking-up of software is not something we should be supporting. But a lot of people do, either because they're ignorant of the long term ramifications or simply because they don't give a shit.

      The biggest problem I have is that there are a LOT of people who are defending these restrictions with the Xbone for some reason, and I doubt they're all Microsoft shills. Some are fanboys, while others don't see the point of pushing back against aggressive companies. Heck, there's an editorial on Neowin where the author suggests we shouldn't be worried about the privacy issues with the always-on Kinect as we don't have any expectation of privacy anymore. In his words we should just "suck it up and get used to it". How fucked up is that?

    16. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's cloud efforts are legendary. Take for example the database that backed the Sidekick and Kin. It did the unforgiveable for a cloud service: it lost data. At the end of the inquiry we find that Roz Ho authorized a SAN migration without full backup because, schedule. Where is Roz now? Working in Windows Phone.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    17. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by westlake · · Score: 1

      For some of us, you've already lost the sale. Always on internet is a killer for many of us, since it's mostly taking away our freedom.

      When is a geek wth broadband service ever off line?

      PC. Chromebook, HDTV, Set-Top Box or Video Game Console. VoIP. Smartphones. Tablets. E-book Readers...

    18. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by dsyu · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is my biggest concern too -- setting/continuing the premise that it's totally ok and expected that products have arbitrary artificial lifetimes.

    19. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Clsid · · Score: 0

      I really would like to know why on earth you would like to pay $100 more for Kinect. Even the Wii provides a better experience in that regard, both for local multiplayer and small kids which I assume is the target demographic for a Kinect right? But in general, why would you want to buy a locked out system when there is a competing solution that is offered for less? It's like going for a Betamax instead of VHS.

    20. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Clsid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kinect is a gimmick like it always have been. I understand why people give away their privacy for something like Google products or Facebook, because at least they are getting something for free. But you are paying for this device and you are perfectly happy with them capturing marketing data off of you. Besides, you know perfectly well that both the XBox and the PS are pretty much the same thing. But hey, fighting for consumer rights does not work if there is people that will say, bah it does not affect me today and then complain when it's too late in the future.

    21. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I agree. What gets me is that there will still be addicted slobs bitching and complaining about all of this which shelling out money as if their games are a requirement for life.

      I got the lecture before about "not everyone's a gaming addict and some people just use it therapeutically" ... as a stress reliever. Yup... not an addict... and can quit any time they want to I'll bet. You know what relaxes me? A guitar in my lap and picking out songs I like. Turns out it works on pretty much every human animal... and most animals in general. Also, can't exactly control my access to my guitar remotely either. I just avoid obvious problems like playing too loud or songs like "happy birthday." (Had a neighbor play happy birthday on his guitar once... party van came and took him away.)

      Great big business mostly knows what they can get away with. Sure, a few people will fall off, but they will make it up with addicts and higher prices. I saw the way Microsoft managed to sell two licenses for every business installation of Windows. (Sounds ridiculous but it's true -- All Windows workstation licenses are sold as "upgrades" only now meaning you have to have a qualifying product purchased or your install of the volume licensed installation is in violation of your license. What qualifies is Any version of Windows or Mac OSX. Sickening and hilarious at the same time. Business buys a new PC, it sells with an OEM license that's worthless because any smart company reloads the machine, and to do that legally, you have to buy another license because the OEM license only entitles you to have that same OEM installation WITH crapware.) They know what they can get away with it and they are doing it.

    22. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hilarious. Yeah, sounds good at first glance. But check other news stories -- Microsoft shares data and access with government. A 24h license thing is there to encourage people to leave their machines always on and always connected. I wonder what the motivation for that could possibly be? What is the practical rationale behind that if it is something completely unrelated to spying? Freedom to push updates with their constantly changing ToS?

      Look, if you're willing to give up so much, could you help a brother out? Throw a bit of what you're throwing out the window in my direction.

    23. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      It is definitely a concern, however I expect that the requirement will be firmware based and removed with the final update to the platform whenever that update is released. Of course that probably won't be for 15 years, so plenty can happen between now and then, but it's not something I'm worried about anymore than I'm worried about it on Steam.

      As for privacy, if Microsoft wants to watch me playing Forza 5 in my underwear that's THEIR problem, not mine.

    24. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to pay for XBL...

    25. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to trade games, your kids and friends will have to pay a "used game fee" to activate it, and you will lose the game from your account. Once you get it back, you will have to pay and they will lose their game information. 24 hr license is per account, not a game license then the game will be free. This makes the bottom line for non-partnered used game stores even harder to make. I want them to take Microsoft, EA, and GameStop to court for price fixing, once it is released instead of conspiracy to the act.

      I have yet to see a demonstration of Kinect technology that was good that wasn't some garage or student lab project. Is there even a native xBox game that uses it well? I can only think of the laughable (the point?) dancing games and the horrid results from Steel Battalion 2.

      Steam is praised for their attitude towards consumers and if their service or the customer's service drops out for any reason, aside from online games or games that used third party online DRM, there is an offline mode. The other problems are on the hands of the developers and not Valve. Don't know about Google Play or the Apple Store. Don't use those products.

    26. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Speaking for myself I very much like the idea of voice commands, there's a LOT of games that can benefit from them. I'd LOVE to call out audibles in Madden, or tell a team-mate to cast a spell or use suppressive fire without going through a command wheel. I'd also love to see Steel Battalion get another go, if the new Kinect can make it work better then the last attempt it could be awesome as well. Also Nike+Kinect is enticing as well.

      The Kinect isn't a make or break thing for me, but I definitely like it's inclusion.

    27. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Nike+Kinect isn't a "game" per se, but my understanding is that it's an effective demonstration of the functionality of the Kinect.

    28. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf is with this "always on internet" B/S?! -- I guaran-fucking-tee that 95% of these whiney little bitches complaining and spouting FUD over the new Xbox are ALREADY online 24/7/365 and probably turn into quivering little piles of turd at the idea of being disconnected for 30 seconds. But now, suddenly, the idea of their console being connected to the net for a few seconds at least ONCE within 24 hours of wanting to play a game is making them scream like the anti-Christ just showed up at their door with an EMP grenade. If you don't turn the thing on for a month, it doesn't care. If you unplug the god-damned thing for a year, it wont magically boot up and "phone home" every day. Retards. Later, when you finally do turn it back on, it might take 30 seconds to verify your identity, and then you can turn off your internet for the next 24 hours and masturbate your tiny dick off with it to your hearts' content, OFFLINE. Fucking pathetic FUD-factory bitches... When I turn on a computer in my house, it's online, period. I don't give a fuck if it's my 360, my PS/3, any one of the 7 PC's/Servers I own, my smartphone, or any fucking thing else. I won't even NOTICE this functionality, and neither would the vast majority of the whining pussies running around wailing to the heavens about this shit... Meanwhile, the Xbox One O/S has an AWESOME amount of functionality that will make it useful in people's living rooms as an entertainment hub, INCLUDING playing games (but not LIMITED to it): THAT'S why I want one. The PS/4 is the same hardware, with a shitload less functionality, and I don't see any reason whatsoever to buy one...

      -AC

      PS: If your panties are all up in a twist about the camera on the kinnect, it's an easy solution, a coupla 2" slices of black electrical tape and your problem's solved...

    29. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      2 different government agencies are already investigating them for violations of the competition act and the consumer protection act.

      Citation needed.

      Also, perhaps they will allow playing from external hard disks. Or you can just juggle discs on the PS4, while Xbox One users can play another game while waiting for players to join one multiplayer games. But you've already decided to hate on the Xbox regardless of the facts, so just move on and stop making up lies about the Xbox.

      --
      This space for rent.
    30. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by schnibitz · · Score: 1

      Good turn off the internet connection on your phone then. -S

    31. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Mr.+Chow · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming the new Kinect will be as hackable as the old one. You can do all kinds of cool stuff with them. I'm actually more interested in its 3d vision than using it as a game controller.

    32. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by ausrob · · Score: 1

      "as long as the servers are always working" - well there's a good point.

      You know one striking difference between the Xbox One and practically any prior gaming console? I can still play the other consoles entirely offline, without the manufacturer's support - provided it's still in working condition of course - pretty much regardless of how old it is. I'll also be able to play any supported game (again, assuming it's in working condition) - regardless of where it came from.

    33. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      link or gtfo? i don't think you need XBL for the phone home functionality.

      you might need xbox live. but not the gold membership.

      you only need multiple gold memberships if you want to play some modes of the next halo in multiplayer on one console...... seriously, that was a big kick in the nuts. for us to play halo4 online with my friends console - even just by ourselves (some of the coop modes) - both of us would have needed xbox live gold. for fucking splitscreen.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    34. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pretty much make the point why the XBone should be avoided when you said "It won't prevent me from playing as often as I like as long as the servers are always working..."

      This, THIS, THIS is why I have a problem with Internet-based DRM. It creates an artificial lifetime on a product where there doesn't need to be one. The ability to run the product is tied to the ability to authenticate against a server somewhere, which introduces so many points of failure (your net connection, the state of the remote server, the state of your account, etc).

      I know this is off topic, but I had to toss in a few pence here.

      I purchased all the games for Mass Effect and all the DLC when they first came out on console. Yet when I decided to play Mass Effect 1 and 2 again, (I purchased them both through Steam as a special), it didn't include all the DLC. And what DLC it did include I was spending hours trying to figure out how to enable officially through the Bioware and EA (Origin) websites. I finally got so fed up that it was so fucking annoying and difficult to enable something I already owned that I just said fuck it and downloaded the Pirated ME Games. All of them. Now I know when I want to play these games again in a decade or so, I will be able to without having to worry about what stupid authentication servers are up to enable the DLC content. I don't care if EA or the industry thinks that is stealing. I paid for the games and I am damn well going to play it when I want to provided I have the hardware to do so.

      So it really pains me when somebody tries to defend that we are always online anyway that DRM and authentication servers are ok. That is just shortsighted thinking and completely selfish regarding your entertainment dollars. I know the industry is trying to move to a license rental only model with planned obsolescence for everything, but I don't have to like it at all. And for anybody that can think beyond their current situation, you shouldn't like it either.

    35. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Richard+Elmore · · Score: 1

      I think there are two very different business models at work here and to be honest the XB1's digital license system has some real possibilities but it's new and unfamiliar and people have a tendency to prefer the devil they know to the one that they don't. The response to Sony's "How to share games on the PS4" makes that pretty clear but there are some down sides to disk sharing (have to get the disk back before YOU can play the game again, doesn't really work well for my out of town friends (my arms aren't that long). The system that MS is proposing seems like it could be a step forward to me. I can share with my friends without having to pass disks around, I can still play the games I have shared, I don't need worry about getting my disk back, I can play my games on my friend's consoles without carrying my disks around with me.

      In the end I think the devil will be in the details. If publishers can set policy for sharing and resale and they choose to be jerks about it then people will vote with their feet but I think that for many (most?) people a reasonable digital licensing system will be step forward from disk based licenses.

      I have not set foot in a video rental store since I subscribed to Netflix streaming. Yea Netflix requires an internet connection but IT ROCKS. I can view videos on my PC, console, tablet and phone. I can start a video on my phone, pause it and continue where I left off later on my console in the living room. I'll never be able to do that with a disk. I think the same thing is true here, a digital license system would allow for new ways of doing things that a disk based one just won't (good or bad).

      Are there potential problems (ISP outages, XBLive outages), yes; but, at least in my experience, these have been few an far between. I think there have been just as many times that I could not play a game because of lost/loaned/scratched disk. If what MS actually ships really offers all the capability they have announced then I think I'm in, if not then PS4 is there as a fallback.

    36. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Look I'm not trying to defend Microsoft here but why are you making this point now? Why are we having this discussion now? Steam, every Blizzard game in recent years, and a number of Ubisoft/EA games for the PC have been doing this for a long while already.

      Why is it suddenly an issue when Microsoft does it with their console?

      People still bought the likes of Diablo 3 en-masse, so do you think people really give a shit? Do you think people will really not buy it because of the DRM?

      Bitching about XBox One DRM is like shutting the barn door when the horse has already bolted. You're about 5 years too late complaining about the whole always online thing, it's already standard throughout the world of PC gaming, it's not surprising that consoles will follow suit given how PC developers have been allowed to get away with it.

    37. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Xest · · Score: 1

      I've been saying this for years, why should I even give up 1 watt, or even one cycle of CPU power for something that doesn't benefit me whatsoever as a legitimate customer? Why should I give up anything for DRM? It's my CPU, it's my broadband connections, it's my RAM, my hard disk, and so on?

      So why is it suddenly an issue now when Microsoft does it with their new console? Steam has been doing this for what, a decade now? but because it has a legion of fanboys on Slashdot it's given a free pass.

      It's so stupid to be complaining about it now when so many people have just tolerated it and let it slip on by on the PC. Where were they screaming, kicking and moaning like they are now about the XBox One when Valve continued to push it? They were out in force when EA did it, when Ubisoft did it, but meanwhile they continued to let Valve do it and because Valve got away with it every other company was just saying well, Valve does, why shouldn't we? This is the problem with fanboyism, rather than recognising all DRM is bad they let their pet company whether it was Apple, or Valve get away with it and then wonder why the fuck everyone else starts doing it. Gee, why do you think? Because they can.

      Whilst Steam still keeps making record sales and has an active army of fanboys defending it's exact same practices of online verification, prevention of second hand resale and so forth, do you think any other company is going to listen?

      When you create one rule for one, and another for everyone else then of course everyone else isn't going to listen to you.

      I'm certainly not defending these restrictions, but I am questioning why the fuck people are only complaining now, and I am asking the question "Where the fuck were you when this started to become more and more commonplace on the PC?" - it'd be a rhetorical question though because I know the answer - they were busy funding it, enjoying it, and defending it on forums. That's called hypocrisy.

    38. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      So why is it suddenly an issue now when Microsoft does it with their new console?

      I'm pretty sure most of the same people complaining about this also objected to the other nonsense. This is not "suddenly" an issue; it always was an issue.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    39. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Then why are so many saying "Fuck the XBox One and it's DRM, use Steam!"

      It makes absolutely zero sense, they're pretending they hate DRM, then saying use someone else's almost identical DRM.

      I think most of those supposedly against DRM really aren't against DRM, they actually don't give a shit about it, they're just feigning hatred of DRM to further what they're really doing - playing platform fanboy which is annoying as fuck as it detracts and discredits those of us making legitimate arguments against DRM itself because those legitimate complaints are lost amongst the nonsensical fanboyism.

      I agree it was always an issue, that's really my point, but the vast majority of those saying "I wont buy the XBox One because of the DRM" are also those who have freely admitted to loving and buying from the likes of Steam previously. It's just sheer hypocrisy, and that's the problem - they're applying double standards and it's got nothing to do with DRM and everything to do with their childish fanboy mindsets. If they genuinely hated the sort of DRM Microsoft has proposed then they'd be boycotting everything from Steam to iTunes, to Google Play and so on but they don't, they make it about one specific product from one specific company.

    40. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      What do any of those devices have to do with an actual reliable internet connection? Unless you paid for a tethering plan for your phone, they are all just as subject to your internet going out, they just don't stop working because of it.

      To me, the problems with the always on connection is a bit more sinister frankly. With the mandatory Kinect watching and listening in 24/7, added to the always on internet connection and the knowledge that Microsoft has willingly and happily given the NSA everything they've asked for, it's not inconceivable to believe this is a handy Big Brother system. I don't think you even need a tin foil hat to figure that one out.

    41. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      You need a Gold subscription to use those media features Microsoft was so proud of, like Hulu & Netflix.

    42. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      Then why are so many saying "Fuck the XBox One and it's DRM, use Steam!"

      "so many"? I don't know if that's true, but not all of us are doing that. I despise any form of DRM.

      are also those who have freely admitted to loving and buying from the likes of Steam previously.

      Some people feel that DRM is magically okay when the games are cheap. They have no principles.

      I do agree with you that these people are hypocrites.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    43. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Everything about this system screams to me that hacking is very much verboten.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    44. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      I can see that including some voice commands to a game would be interesting for game play and immersion. But that is a slim upside to the very real downsides that are presented with the always on spycam/mic and phone homeing of the system.

      Further what if the game requires you to be yelling at it for that functionality instead of it being an option? Have fun playing it when you need to be quiet like you can currently do.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    45. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yeah... how am I going to use this where there is no internet?

      Watching recorded shows/games on the DVR during those times.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    46. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, finally found an Xbro defending the XboxOne's install requirement. Awesome!

      Maybe just a paid MS shill?

    47. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

      ...privacy issues with the always-on Kinect...

      You lost right there. How are people still unaware that the Kinect is always-on only by default currently - though that will likely change with all the hostility towards it - and has been explicitly said could be turned off (thus, by definition, NOT "always-on").

    48. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by blackdragon07 · · Score: 1

      So your telling me your console isn't always hooked into the internet when your gaming? I understand that some don't have good connections etc and it sucks non the less but stop and think do you unplug your current console from the internet when your only going to play a single player game??

    49. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed.

      You can take your needed citation and shove it up your anal retentive ass

    50. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Citation: I called the agencies and started the processes personally and they agreed that there was sufficient reason to investigate as a) there appears to be collusion going on between the publishers and b) their MSP phase out plan violates the no-expiry on gift card laws.

      The USB latency times would degrade the performance of the games significantly and likely increase crash times. I won't be buying a console in the next generation - I'll be sticking with the 360 and PC gaming. I hate the X1 because of the facts which are:

      1) Phone home lockouts means I can't play on vacation
      2) Anti-lending scheme means I can't share with my family/friends
      3) Mandatory installs and the inability to upgrade the internal hdd means unacceptable wait times and content juggling which is a waste of my ever shrinking free time for gaming
      4) Violating exhaustion rights is an insult to everyone who buys games.
      5) Price. $500 is insane for a console - especially an x86 one which I can out spec for less money (this year old laptop out specs it which now costs $550). And within a couple months I'd have to buy another $200 worth of hardware to decrease the experience because MS couldn't bother to add a hot swappable expansion slot or reasonable size hdd.
      6) It has a lot of features I have no interest in: I could care less about Kinect 2 or cloud computing. I'm not an MMO player - I like to play a lot of variety not a single grindy game. The form factor is pathetic. The EULA is ridiculous. To top it all off the one feature I wanted to see didn't show up: smaller controllers so I can play with my fiance/nephew - unfortunately they find the controllers for the 360 too large and get hand cramps.

    51. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      It's ok, I happily admit I'm the source of the investigations. Once the facts were confirmed http://www.trueachievements.com/n13475/xbox-one-privacy-connectivity-and-game-licensing.htm I immediately consulted the competition act and found possible violations of sections 45, 75, 77 and the competition bureau added in 78, 80, and 90.1

      Then when I first heard the MSP phase out plans I consulted the official MS FAQ on xbox.com and found it contained a line about converted funds expiring after 1 year. I then emailed the details to the consumer protection agency and they had me call them to discuss the issue which was ended with "that's a very interesting scenario and does appear to be under our mandate - we will assign an agent to the issue and call you back if we require further details"

    52. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      What do any of those devices have to do with an actual reliable internet connection?

      Even though I have an extremely reliable Internet connection, I still wouldn't buy any gaming system that required a connection to play.

      That's because even though I've had less than 12 hours total downtime in the 4 years I've had FiOS (ignoring power outages, which make it hard to play a console, anyway), I suspect that any authentication servers will have a lot more "downtime" (either really down, or too slow to respond so as to not allow me to authenticate) that it would swamp any downtime that was my ISP's fault.

    53. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I'm making the switch to PC gaming after being an xbox fan for years. Considering you can pick up a video card with similar capability to the new consoles for around $150 there isn't a huge barrier to at least trying it.

    54. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me tell you a horror story, son.

      It all started on a Friday afternoon. I drove home through horrible rush hour traffic to my apartment in a large city, glad to be home after yet anothing annoying week at work. I sat down at my computer to check slashdot, my email, and probably some video game news sites, and lo, my internet connection was not working.

      Now, my internet comes from AT&T Uverse, so my first reaction was to check if my TV service was working. Alas, it was down, too. An hour later, after a conversation with a relatively helpful tech support rep, I had my prognosis: I wasn't going to have my internet connection back until Monday.

      Needless to say, by Saturday afternoon, things were getting tense. If I didn't have my Xbox 360 available to bring me through the crisis, I don't know what would have happened.

      Had I had an XBone, my console would have stopped working somewhere around Saturday morning at the latest. I would have been sitting, in a major US city, without an internet connection, and with a game console that could best be used as a door stop.

      I just want you to remember this day. Remember, when you are sitting around in your living room some time next year with no internet connection and no hope, that you blithely dismissed the online restrictions of your game console. Remember that you were one of the people that gave Microsoft money for a console with these restrictions. Remember that you were part of tipping the scales to make your plight the new reality for all of us.

    55. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Since the PS4 doesn't have a Kinect the game will most likely come with the option to do it the traditional way.

    56. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Given the value-add that the Kinect hackers were for MS I would be very surprised if they have the Kinect itself any more locked down.

    57. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who would rather pay $10 for a functional software license over paying $60 for an actual copy of the software, and yet detests the idea of paying $60 for just the license, is a hypocrite who has no principles. Especially since the XBone requires a dedicated hardware investment and Steam doesn't.

    58. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now having had a peek at the next-gen consoles, I realize I've never been happier about being a PC gamer.

      How's the used game market for PCs?

    59. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      How's the used game market for PCs?

      Great. I recently bought Saints Row Third for $4.99 on Steam.

      Oh wait. That was a NEW game.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    60. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Considering you can pick up a video card with similar capability to the new consoles for around $150 there isn't a huge barrier to at least trying it.

      If you can up that to about $200, you can get a video card that will let you see things in games that you'd never imagine in a console game.

      Try this: play a little bit of Metro:Last Light on a PC with an nVidia 660 or better. It will blow your mind. It's like an entirely different game. I saw a few minutes of that game on a PS3 and couldn't believe how far degraded the game was on that system.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    61. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by gagol · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it will come around to "They can take away our Internet, but they'll never take away out Samizdat!"

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    62. Re:Spin it all you like guys ... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      And you justify that position in light of how they are locking down this new console...how?

      MS has always been a company that has thrown stuff out to the public and then once it became profitable, locked it down with a vengeance. With the XBone they seem to be just accelerating the processes here a bit.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  3. Ignore the FUD, here's the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Netcraft confirms it, the XBone will definitely add 3-4" to your penis after only one use!

    1. Re:Ignore the FUD, here's the truth by rrohbeck · · Score: 4, Informative

      3-4=-1.

    2. Re:Ignore the FUD, here's the truth by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      Indeterminate. There was no unit *cough* on the 3.

    3. Re:Ignore the FUD, here's the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be said that the quality of slashdot is reaching an all time low, when "3-4=-1", is rated as +4 Informative.

  4. LMFTFY by symbolset · · Score: 0

    3-4"

    - 3-4"

    Was probably a /. formatting bug. You are forgiven.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  5. Beware Internet Echo Chambers by blarkon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember the rage around here a few years back when Sony nixed Linux on PS3. Or the whole "rootkit fiasco"? Amazing how quickly past outrage is forgotten.

    1. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember the number of people who signed a "I will not buy MW2 if it doesn't include dedicated servers" and subsequently were playing it on launch day?

    2. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember the rage around here a few years back when Sony nixed Linux on PS3. Or the whole "rootkit fiasco"? Amazing how quickly past outrage is forgotten.

      There's incompetence, and then there's monumental epic cluster fuck moments of total and abject negligence like this. Sony throwing root kits onto CDs and nixing Linux on the PS3 were just bad decisions. Dumb decisions. The development of the XBone makes that look like someone flushing a cherry bomb down the toilet compared to a FAE.

      This isn't normal stupid... this is weapons grade stupid.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I do remember the rootkit fisaco. And I haven't purchased a sony product since.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    4. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by sourcerror · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just think about how many people is affected by the removal of OtherOS, and how many by the 24 hour authentication.

    5. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Triv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sony may have screwed up in the past, but they also generated a metric fuckton of goodwill at E3. That press conference was a marvel of modern brand messaging. It convinced a lot of people not at all interested in this generation of console, myself included, to seriously consider a PS4.

      There's principle, and there's bloody-mindedness for the sake of itself. It's okay to change your mind.

    6. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I could mod this up to an 11, I would. Just because Microsoft has failed miserably here doesn't mean we should all flock to the PS4. I'll never trust Sony after the OtherOS fiasco. Considering how many people are commenting about building gaming PCs, I don't expect a lot of people will, either.

      In this generation, we've seen Microsoft release the biggest abomination in console gaming, Nintendo release a machine cobbled together from parts they found in the garage, and Sony trying to look innocent while they have filed for patents on worse DRM schemes than Microsoft's. This console generation is going to be a drag.

    7. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I still won't buy a PS4. Microsoft may have screwed themselves over, but Sony can't be trusted. As I said above, play games on a PC, in Linux ideally.

    8. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by marcosdumay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me see it I got that right: Sonny p0wing your computer is just stupid, but MS making an always online console is weapons grade stupid? I got that right?

      Also, why does nobody remember the "always on" feature of the MS Teleprompt?

    9. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by gman003 · · Score: 1

      This is different. I listen in on the mainstream game chatter (ie. Kotaku et al), and this is big. The last thing to be so universally despised was what, "The War Z"? Duke Nukem Forever? I've *never* seen a console get outright hated like this - indifference, yes, or "it would be cool if it didn't cost so damn much", but never "I wouldn't take one if they were free".

      It started with the announcement conference - they spent virtually no time talking about actual games. There was maybe 50 frames of actual gameplay in the entire hour-long announcement. They spent longer talking about the dog in the next Call of Duty.

      The Microsoft fanboys defended with "they're saving all the gaming news for E3". Now? I haven't heard anything. Microsoft has gotten their own fanboys to shut up - that has got to be some sort of new record.

      I know more people planning to buy the new Xb360 model than the Xb1. Hell, I know more people planning to buy an Ouya than the Xb1. Or who want a Surface. This is a failure beyond even the Zune.

      Now, I still don't think the Xb1 is dead on arrival. It'll sell, to some. Maybe even become a decent seller, if they rebrand it as a set-top box that plays games, rather than a game console that's also a DVR/TV thing.

    10. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember. Sony pulled a bait-and-switch before, so I don't trust Sony. They will renege on their promises after the initial thrust of sales.

      So, Microsoft is making horrible consumer-hostile promises that I don't want, and Sony is making consumer-friendly promises that it won't keep.

      I will just stick with my PC. Yes, I am aware that Steam kills the second-hand gaming market too...but...it also sells me the games for $2.50 if I am willing to buy them on a lag of a couple of years, which I am.

    11. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me see it I got that right: Sonny p0wing your computer is just stupid, but MS making an always online console is weapons grade stupid? I got that right?

      Sony got found out pretty early on there, bud. See, that's the awesome part about even the partly open systems of the Windows world. You can't hide your dirty laundry for long.. and let's be honest: There's people out there far better than Sony at this. It was amateur hour, okay? This was a middle manager telling his engineers to make this happen "or else", and not much more thought put into it than that, because he read in a trade show mag somewhere it was his duty to defend the company from the evil pirates by any means necessary, ethics be damned. And the poor bastard fell into that pit trap and took the whole company's public reputation with him.

      It was stupid, ill-thought out, and poorly executed.

      Now on the other side, we have the XBone... it's watching you like some creepy stalker, while you undress, while you watch TV.. recording everything you do... it makes the NSA's capturing of your phone's "meta data" look positively germane. I mean, they're making no bones about the XBone's objective here: It's to hoover-vac every last shred of privacy you ever had and sell it to the highest bidder.

      This was deliberate, well thought out, well-funded, and the only thing that was poorly executed here was the public relations. They've come out looking like some lovecraftian horror beast about to be sent back into the deep by Johnny Depp wearing a pirate hat... They served their asses on a silver platter. But no... there is no contest here man. Not. Even. Fucking. Close.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    12. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Also, why does nobody remember the "always on" feature of the MS Teleprompt?

      Because nobody knows wtf that is.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Squiddie · · Score: 1

      Companies can change. If they see the error of their ways and start pleasing the customer, they should be rewarded. We shouldn't hold grudges. It's not like Sony is murdering baby seals. If MS reverses their policies, I think games should forgive them. Of course, the PS4 is still more powerful and cheaper, so if I do get a console this time around, I might pick one up. That's assuming most of those games don't turn up on PC, which they might with the hole x86 CPU both of them have going on there.

    14. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      As I said above, play games on a PC, in Linux ideally.

      Yes, because executing arbitrary code under Linux is safer than executing arbitrary code under Windows, right? Most games are still closed source. And Linux has had plenty of security vulnerabilities over the years as well. If that's the only thing you're basing your decision on, well...

      Good luck.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    15. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to pronounce 'false dichotomy'?

      It's possible for both of the next gen offerings to be about as compelling as the last generation.

      (not very)

    16. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's pretty close to the same level of stupid... it's just that sony admitted it might have screwed up a bit at the time if you knew where to look... whereas microsoft are busy agreeing that yes it is unfortunate but we're absolutely so excited to be able to offer this *incredible* condescention at no extra cost!

    17. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Sony may have screwed up in the past, but they also generated a metric fuckton of goodwill at E3.

      Why are people acting like Sony and Microsoft are the only consoles available.

      The Wii U may be meh, but it's miles ahead of the XBone or PS4.

      Also, you're a complete fool if you think some fancy corporate moves at E3 has made Sony change.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony may have screwed up in the past, but they also generated a metric fuckton of goodwill at E3. That press conference was a marvel of modern brand messaging. It convinced a lot of people not at all interested in this generation of console, myself included, to seriously consider a PS4.

      There's principle, and there's bloody-mindedness for the sake of itself. It's okay to change your mind.

      Face it, you're going to end up with both. They're cheaper in dollar terms than last time around, and with inflation that's even cheaper in real terms. And screens are dirt cheap too, so you'll have more than one big screen to go with it. PS4 will be sitting under the screen in the den being the arcade machine while XBox One sits under the TV in the living room.

    19. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Remember when Microsoft released a new generation game console that was nearly identical in hardware to its competitor, but had severely less gamer-friendly policies? No, I don't either.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    20. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by fredgiblet · · Score: 0

      The Wii U is a platform for playing Nintendo 1st party games. If you aren't interested in that then it's pretty much garbage. Nintendo ceded the Core Gamer audience last generation and have nothing to lure them back.

    21. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      For the record, those of us saying that they were saving most of the gaming for E3 were right. Of course they've shot themselves in the foot in other ways, but we were right about that.

      Not a fanboi by the way before someone tries to mock me for it.

    22. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, a Microsoft Windows PC can be trusted. Not.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    23. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's Rootkits?
      Horrible, yes, but the company quickly figured out how the fanbase absolutely hated it, and quickly recanted. Microsoft ISN'T recanting anything, they are beating you over the head with it until you agree to wanting it.

      Linux on PS3?, I really don't know anyone who actually used that. For anyone who bought a PS3 specifically to put Linux on it, yes, they got screwed, but it had absolutely no affect on the vast majority of gamers, hence why the vast majority of gamers don't care.

    24. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by erroneus · · Score: 1

      You're almost there.

      None of them can be trusted. It's beyond time to look for something else to do with your time.

    25. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Clsid · · Score: 1

      And a lot of people don't realize the energy savings. A Wii U only uses around 32W while the PS3 needs over 200W and the XBox360 uses around 187. A PC gaming rig is much more than that. That is one of the reasons I have decided to do my gaming on a Nintendo console now.

    26. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rootkits were pretty epic stupid. Eliminating Linux realistically impacted a tiny fraction of 1% of users. I don't know a single person that ever booted to Linux on a PS3 (not saying such people don't exist, just never actually seen one).

      The first time MS servers choke (which will happen) and millions are unable to play, this policy will explode like nothing in console gaming history.

    27. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      That's the part that gets me the most about this. Everyone is talking about the XBone like it's price is absurd, but it's actually were I expected BOTH consoles to be. The fact that the PS4 is lower makes me unhappy because it means they could have made it a lot more powerful. The reality is that the price for games has been declining when you take inflation into account and the price of the XBone is significantly lower than the PS3's launch price not even taking inflation into account. Higher than the PS4? Yes. Unreasonably so? Not really.

    28. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      How is it different from every iPhone, iPad, Android phone or tablet or laptops with webcams, recording even your location, video and audio?

      --
      This space for rent.
    29. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If you don't know how the XBone is less gamer-friendly then you are seriously in denial. How can you even pretend? Oh, right, that's where your money comes from. Sorry. Carry on with your "lalala this is not happening" while the world passes you by. That's how you came to be where you are.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    30. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miles ahead?
      -Region locked? Check
      -Single voltage power adapter? Check (makes it annoying for importing)
      -Bricks if controller loses power during update? Check (This is a problem when you don't have enough voltage transformers, see point 2)
      -Digital games tied to console rather than account? Check

      Sorry I've never quite understand why Nintendo doesn't have at least as bad a reputation as Sony.

    31. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      Both the current PS3 and Xbox 360 models use less than 80W. The figures you cited might have been accurate at launch, but they have progressively been lowered since then. Both consoles got to around 100W in 2008.

      Also, while the Wii U itself uses 32W, the gamepad uses something over 5W (it cannot be powered from a 5V 1A usb port, since it draws more), bringing the total closer to 40W. So, in fact, both Xbox 360 and PS3 use about double the power of the Wii U, not six time more as you imply.

      Sources:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_hardware#Form_and_power_consumption
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware#Power_supply
      http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-wii-u-is-the-green-console

    32. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the XBox One is a root kit for your home, with its always recording kinnect sensors. And don't bother boring me with some non-sense about privacy controls, those can be changed or bypassed at any moment at Microsoft's (or some other agent's) convenience, they're pure software.

    33. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      I love it how when faced with simple facts you retreat to personal insults instead of addressing them.

      --
      This space for rent.
    34. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by wichawa · · Score: 1

      This was a middle manager telling his engineers to make this happen "or else", and not much more thought put into it than that, because he read in a trade show mag somewhere it was his duty to defend the company from the evil pirates by any means necessary, ethics be damned. And the poor bastard fell into that pit trap and took the whole company's public reputation with him

      Glengarry Glen Ross scenes just flashed across my mind, except they were transposed to IP related firms. The undying need for sales "leads" and aggressively asserting oneself over said "leads," as is well represented through Glengarry Glen Ross, shares so many parallels to the undying need to aggressively conquer more artificial territory of the mind.

      I swear this would totally work as a film....

    35. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is a nerd with a PC in his living room.
      My wife would kick me out if I do connect ugly PC to TV, while the PS3 was greeted as welcome addition (and she' gaming herself, mostly GTA and Oblivion).

    36. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by symbolset · · Score: 1

      That's your argument? That I haven't retold the list in this thread? Do you even want the list retold the maximum number of times? Jesus H Christ do I even need to enumerate these? I am not going to do it. If you don't have the list yet, scroll up.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    37. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to attack you or anything, but I just wanted to point out that germane doesn't mean what you seem to be using it to mean here.

    38. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Because it's mostly hardcore Nintendo fanboys buying their systems these days most likely.

    39. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when Microsoft released a new generation game console that was nearly identical in hardware to its competitor, but had severely less gamer-friendly policies? No, I don't either.

      I don't either. Are you referring to the next console cycle starting in 2020?

    40. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by darkain · · Score: 1

      What, the Microsoft Cloud Services going offline!? That'll never happen!

      http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2013/02/25/windows-azure-cloud-crashed-by-expired-ssl-certificate/

    41. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between (impotent) nerd rage and crafting antagonistic policies seemingly designed to alienate your core user base.

      In the case of the rootkits, those were, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively small matter. They were only distributed on a small number of discs, were relatively simply removed eventually, and didn't have any long-term repercussions. We were rightly outraged, but we also have to admit that the issue never became a large one. It was a black eye, but other than people choosing to take a stand on principle, it didn't really preclude us from purchasing other CDs from Sony.

      The Linux removal had longer-term repercussions, but it only affected a very small subset of the audience for the console. Definitely a dick move, but still not something worthy of generating general outrage in the broader community of gamers. We were, again, right in being outraged, but the only users it directly impacted were the extreme minority that were actually making use of Other OS.

      In contrast to those, the policies for the Xbox One could be with us for the next 10 years and directly effect the primary audience for the device in an extremely negative fashion. They've created artificial limits on used games (sufficient enough to effectively destroy the market), artificial limits on sharing games, artificial limits on playing single player games (i.e. having to phone home daily), and on top of all that have yet to promise that any of our games (even the single players ones!) will work after the console has reached its end of life and the phone home servers have stopped responding. And all of that is before you even consider the concerns over privacy that now exist since the Kinect 2 has a built-in microphone and is required to be connected in order for the device to turn on or function: concerns which have taken on a whole new meaning in light of the PRISM leak.

      The Internet definitely has a short memory, but this seems to be an issue that won't go away unless Microsoft outright changes its policies. The broader gaming community is up in arms over this, as opposed to it just being a geeky issue. As evidence, GameFAQs ran some polls recently which might indicate the current thoughts of gamers, leading up to and after E3.

      Before E3 when they asked do you plan to buy a One?, only 5% indicated they would. The next day when they asked the same question of the PS4, about 40% indicated they planned to buy a PS4. So, before E3 the One was clearly out of favor among gamers, but that was to be expected, since MS' debut presentation barely showed any games at all, with them promising that the games would be shown at E3.

      Indeed, MS' E3 presentation was very gaming focused and was clearly aimed at addressing the perceived deficiency in games, so, since E3 is one of the most important platforms for reaching the core gamer demographic, we'd assume that the One would see a decent improvement in terms of public perception post-E3. And after E3 GameFAQs had a similar poll to the earlier ones, this time asking about people's plans to pre-order the new consoles. The PS4 went from 40% planning to buy it before E3 to 57% after it, while the One went from 5% before to 7% after. Perhaps even more telling, only 23% of gamers think the One is better than the Wii U, despite the Wii U generally being considered a flop both commercially and among the gaming community.

      Again, there's a big difference between angering a handful of people in a niche community and what they're doing here to alienate their primary demographic.

    42. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I think the point of other os is sony can change their mind based on a fart, whatever they promise could be changed with a simple update

      why not, they have done it before, sony putting on the good will now doesnt mean squat for update v2 or whenever they change their minds

    43. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by FrangoAssado · · Score: 1

      Don't try to trivialize Sony's rootkit fiasco, it was not just a matter of a company releasing an unpopular product and then recanting.

      What Sony did was possibly illegal. "Possibly" only because they were never convicted -- they settled all the lawsuits -- but in many states there are specific laws against covertly installing spyware (a lot of states have a very similar piece of legislation called "Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act", here are the ones for Texas and California, for example).

      Not to mention that the rootkit opened vulnerabilities in the systems where it was installed (more details on Wikipedia). The federal government didn't sue, but the Department of Homeland Security made very clear that what Sony did was unacceptable.

    44. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Yup, but the situations are quite different. In contrast to MW2, which was an end to itself, the One is merely a means to an end (i.e. it's what you use to enjoy your entertainment, rather than itself being a form of entertainment).

      In the case of MW2, the only available alternative was to abandon it (and your friends) completely and play something else, which is a hard pill for some people to swallow. In the case of the Xbox One, the obvious alternative is to simply play your game on the competing console that costs $100 less and comes with none of the draconian restrictions. Not to mention that the differences in distribution (digital vs. physical) and price ($60 vs. $500) might make it quite a bit easier for people to make impulse purchases in moments of weakness with MW2, and quite a bit harder to do the same with the One.

    45. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Not trying to attack you or anything, but I just wanted to point out that germane doesn't mean what you seem to be using it to mean here.

      Actually, it means the exact opposite of what was intended. I was trying for a spot of dramatic irony... but meeeeh. It doesn't come across so well on ye olde internetz.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    46. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you forget, but I haven't. I loved my PS2, but never bought a PS3 after a combination of the Other OS fiasco and memories of the Rootkit still lingering. I would definitely have bought one eventually otherwise.

      I also haven't bought an EA game since Spore's launch, and have been deeply sceptical of any promises to come out of Microsoft's Entertainment division since the Play For Sure nonsense. I don't have unlimited money, and I find plenty to spend it on even once I've cut out companies who wind me up.

    47. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      I certainly did not forget. I will not buy any Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo products.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    48. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      Linux on PS3?, I really don't know anyone who actually used that.

      Screwing over your customers is not okay simply because you did not screw over more than a few of them.

      hence why the vast majority of gamers don't care.

      Things such as this speak volumes about the intelligence of many gamers.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    49. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      You still will be able to get a new PS4 that doesn't require internet (and if you don't connect it, they can't patch it), or you can LEGALLY restore the old firmware if you have to knowhow.

      With the Xbone you can't decline the firmware update or else your console becomes unusable due to the missed authentication.

    50. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very, very simple: On Android, you can disable "record my audio". On "Xbone" you can't do that.

    51. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by aepervius · · Score: 1

      "Let me see it I got that right: Sonny p0wing your computer is just stupid, but MS making an always online console is weapons grade stupid? I got that right?"

      Yes because most consumer , are not geek, don't even know what a rootkit is, and probably would not care to be rooted. On the other hand many people I discuss at work knows very very well what Xbone restriction entails, some are shocked to be forced to log in every day they want to play (and don't have internet linked to their console today) some are shocked that they won't be able to bring a disk to a friend and play. Bottom line is all are dumb founded at Xbone, but none of them knows about the "other" OS story, and most of them except one ever heard of the rootkit thingy. Sure it is anecdotal, but try asking around yourself to normal people, not the type reading slashdot, but still the type liking to game on console and keeping up to date with gaming news.

      --
      C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
      visit randi.org
    52. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      The *always* do that at E3 though... OK so you remember OtherOS and the root kit, but do you remember the dual-HDMI-out on the PS3? Remember Eight Days? The card readers? The 6 USB ports? Streaming your video files to your friends in Home? The importance of a single-SKU? Remember when backwards compatibility was a "core value" of the PS brand? Remember when every PS3 title would run in 1080p? Remember when motion sensing was a gimmick, and rumble on a wireless controller was impossible?

      So they generated a ton of good will by telling us they would let us own what we bought... the same guys who stripped the Linux functionality out of a device they'd already sold us just a couple of years back, and you believed them?

    53. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by mrfaithful · · Score: 1

      How is it different from every iPhone, iPad, Android phone or tablet or laptops with webcams, recording even your location, video and audio?

      Because they don't. Your android phone activates the webcam as requested for activities that use it. They don't run them 24/7 due to the battery sucking nature of them. As I understand it, the Kinect is ALWAYS listening and ALWAYS recording because it is sitting waiting for you to speak the command words, or wave the right gesture. Sure you'd expect that this is just recording to a circular buffer which gets thrown in the bit bucket when it doesn't detect something on the whitelist, but years of experience has taught me that it's not going to be long before some hacker gets into the internals and finds a database that has recorded everything everyone in the room has said for the last few days. Emails will fly around Microsoft's HQ and they'll spin it as merely for "anonymous usage stats" or "essential algorithmic learning" but we'll know that yet again a company was caught doing something no sensible person would believe they would do AGAIN.

    54. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Sony throwing root kits onto CDs

      Throwing rootkits onto CDs is a federal crime that would have gotten any of us a decade in jail.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    55. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the rage around here a few years back when Sony nixed Linux on PS3. Or the whole "rootkit fiasco"? Amazing how quickly past outrage is forgotten.

      Remember DIVX? (Not to be confused with DivX)

    56. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

      Wow, you're just eyeballs deep in the shit you spew.

      it's watching you like some creepy stalker, while you undress, while you watch TV.. recording everything you do..

      Cite specific, verifiable sources for this or STFU. If you honestly believe that bullshit, right before you put on your tinfoil hat, slap a few inches of electrical tape over the cameras. Problem solved.

      Quoting a portions of the Chicago Tribune:

      "Mr. President: Save us from Xbox One
      May 24, 2013|John Kass

      That's why Xbox One must die.

      All the glitzy stuff aside, the danger of Xbox One is that in the hands of an evil genius — or an IRS agent — it could be a spy system.

      Why?

      It has a camera and a microphone.

      The camera will look at you when you enter a room, recognize your face and greet you. The microphone will pick up your voice,
      if you dare speak your thoughts out loud in your own home and transmit it into voice recognition software.

      Oh, and you can't turn the microphone off.

      The high-powered processor is triggered by keywords. It will learn your video preferences and offer you movies and
      other entertainment choices based on those preferences.

      To recap: It watches you, it greets you, it knows you. It listens to you, it never stops listening. It anticipates your needs."

      ---The article does end with the sad truth---

      ""It's not important to us," a high school junior told me the other day when I lectured at Lake Park High School in Roselle.
      "We don't care about the cameras.""

      http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-05-24/news/ct-met-kass-0524-20130524_1_drone-attacks-xbox-one-jeff-henshaw

    57. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Quila · · Score: 1

      This isn't normal stupid... this is weapons grade stupid.

      That's my quote of the week. Thanks.

    58. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. To this day I refuse to purchase another one of their potentially booby-trapped products.

    59. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong name. It's telescreen.

    60. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to reward MS for flim flamming you? They are stating these requirements at E3 to get some additional free press. Then they're going to remove them or lax them a great deal before actual product launch. Getting even more press momentum and good feelings from idiots like yourself.

    61. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by dkf · · Score: 1

      it makes the NSA's capturing of your phone's "meta data" look positively germane

      That word you are using. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    62. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by alexo · · Score: 1

      It was stupid, ill-thought out, and poorly executed.

      No, it was criminal.
      If it was a private person distributing CDs with rootkits on them, he would be in jail.

    63. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO -- Did you actually just quote an editorial as a factual citation?

      Let me educate you: An actual citation would be one where the article actually states specifically that the xbox one camera IS always on, even when it's turned off, AND that it actually does record everything all the time and reports it to the NSA/CIA/FBI. Come back when you find one of THOSE to cite...

    64. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      um yea I think you are a bit behind on how sony does things, what happens is you buy a new game that magically needs the latest firmware which is nice enough to provide to you on the disc

      just press X and everything will be ok (and btw remember that advertised feature, fuck you) if you do not accept this, you will no longer be allowed to play any new games from this point onward, do you agree?

    65. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it does. Look up "irony" and re-read the post you're having trouble with. It should become more clear to you the second time.

    66. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO, indeed. Since you apparently don't know, this is how it is, these days: Given the track record of Microsoft and for example the NSA, it's the opposite way. It's up to the likes of YOU to provide credible citations that the system does NOT do what it evidently CAN do.

      Please, go on. Find one credible citation. Educate.

    67. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get a decent case for the PC so it doesn't look out of place underneath the TV.

    68. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, what's your reason for not buying Nintendo? Are you just not interested or is there something particular they have done?

    69. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

      Region restrictions and closed-down systems.

      --
      Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
    70. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Sony may have screwed up in the past, but they also generated a metric fuckton of goodwill at E3. That press conference was a marvel of modern brand messaging. It convinced a lot of people not at all interested in this generation of console, myself included, to seriously consider a PS4.

      There's principle, and there's bloody-mindedness for the sake of itself. It's okay to change your mind.

      Right!!! Because Sony has lied to us many times in the past, we think they have to be telling the truth this time! It's not like they might just push down an update a few months later that takes away the right to play used games. I seem to remember them talking about developing that and then got all quiet about it. I think their strategy is to let MS take the fall for the public announcements and then they can just follow in their wake afterwards when everybody has already bought the PS4. What are you going to do, vow to never buy Sony again? Yeah, that worked out so badly for them last time!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    71. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      LMAO -- Did you actually just quote an editorial as a factual citation?

      Let me educate you: An actual citation would be one where the article actually states specifically that the xbox one camera IS always on, even when it's turned off,

      Make no mistake that Xbone will know who and where you are the living room with the Xbone
      and adjacent areas. Being available to change the channel by you telling it to. Or if disadvantaged
      a gesture such as a hand wave in a circle. It can't do this without a microphone and camera on all the time.

      If you can't get that from Xbone's published abilities, no amount of links will convince you.

      "The Kinect for Windows sensor and SDK give you the tools you need to develop
      innovative applications that harness speech and human tracking."

      Kinect Game Development on Windows
      http://www.xbox.com/en-US/developers?xr=footnav

      Doesn't get much more open ended than that, it's uses are only limited to your imagination
      and needs. So you need to ask the question:
      Is it watching me like some creepy stalker, while I undress, while I watch TV. recording everything I do?
      to every programmer/hacker that writes a program for the Zbone, cause yes it's already set up for it.

       

      AND that it actually does record everything all the time and reports it to the NSA/CIA/FBI. Come back when you find one of THOSE to cite...

      Did Prism not teach you anything?

    72. Re:Beware Internet Echo Chambers by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      The problem though is that Sony actually did the exact opposite of what XBox and Microsoft is doing. Here is the short list:

      1) Not having always on DRM. Sony listened to the rage of gamers for a change. Microsoft said "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      2) Allowing game sharing. Sony listened to everybody. Microsoft said "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      3) Sony learned from past mistakes with the PS3 and modified any plans they had for the PS4. Microsoft is making the exact same mistakes while saying "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      4) Not having an always on Kinect that behaves like Sauron. Sony chose not to add that peripheral. Microsoft "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      5) Sony didn't say "If you want offline games, get a Xbox 360.". Microsoft said that and "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      6) Sony has games. Maybe not "exclusives", but certainly it has games. Microsoft has "Halo Part Ad Infinitum: Return of Something Or Other" and a remix of an old as fuck fighting game that wasn't that great to begin with. Otherwise the Xbox One is a replacement for people's TV Remote. A $499 replacement that will brick in 24 hrs if it can't phone home. Don't like it? Microsoft: "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      7) People tend to forget that the makers of XBox One are the same makers of such "wonderful" (Read: Shit) products like: Windows Vista. Windows 98. Windows Zune. Windows 8. Windows Surface... Pretty much everything that Microsoft makes is shit so the list is rather large. Of course, that is why Microsoft keeps saying "Fuck you. Take it or else..."
      8) While Sony isn't fully engaged in indie game makers, at least it isn't making them find a publisher. Otherwise Microsoft says, you guessed it: "Fuck you. Take it or else..."

      Bottom line: People have and still do have complaints about Sony's past actions. However, it seems like Microsoft has gone back to it's old, evil ways with the XBox One and are overlooking Sony's blunders in exchange for Microsoft's blunders. People are choosing the lesser of two evils and I am sure that the PS4 has it's own set of evils.

      So maybe it should be gamers who say "Fuck you Microsoft. Take us going to the PS4 as our answer to your 'or else' part" in order for Microsoft to realize the error of their ways.

  6. Watermarking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wonder if MS decided to "watermark" the list before sending it around. A typo here, maybe swap two points there, each person receives an individualized version and the leak can be tracked back to the source. In which case I feel sorry for the person who gets the axe.

    1. Re:Watermarking? by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1

      Funny thing.

      I downloaded the .txt file from the pastebin page, because I don't like the way the text doesn't wrap in firefox. So, I load the text file in gedit, ctrl-a, ctrl-c, then paste the text into a new libreoffice document. So, I'm reading along, since I figure it's good training for when I get to be a well-respected Microsoft spokesperson some day, and some of the spaces between the words look like they've been highlighted somehow.

      It seems that there are a number of places where the spaces between words are represented by the sequence of "\302\240" (which i "discovered" by pasting the mystery character into an lxterm window, and hitting the enter key. When I did a global search and replace, this character sequence occured 33 times.

      This isn't the most eloquent post, but I'm just laying down the basics of what I saw so that another can test it for themselves. Maybe it's nothing, I'm sure someone way smarter than me, will tell me how foolish I am, and am just ignorant in some way, but it's there.

      Does that sound like it could be used as a watermark to track down a disloyal employee? I admit it's not very hack-proof, but it looks like it could work in a pinch, and maybe is "working" (since the odd character combination seems to have survived being leaked and posted on the net).

      Discuss.

      Wonder if MS decided to "watermark" the list before sending it around. A typo here, maybe swap two points there, each person receives an individualized version and the leak can be tracked back to the source. In which case I feel sorry for the person who gets the axe.

      --
      For hire.
  7. Herp Derp Derp by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Q: What exclusive first-party games are in development, and when will we see them?

    A: None. Despite bending our customers over a barrel and raping them until they bled and screamed for mercy with our new DRM, we don't have a single exclusive to show for it.

    Q: How many games do you plan to ship at launch?

    A: We got a lot of promises, but the warehouse is presently, uhh, a bit vacant.

    Q: What is the new Xbox Live?

    A: For game publishers, it's the second coming of Christ, the ressurection, the moment we've been waiting for, beating ourselves off to in private fantasizing over. For game players, it's an unholy cluster fuck that makes Square Enix scorched Earth policy on every franchise you ever loved look positively humane.

    Q: What new benefits does Xbox Live offer?

    A: The new generation of Xbox Live gets to know you and your preferences, by watching you 24/7 through a webcam that cannot be turned off, and puts you at the center of all your games and entertainment, and then builds a giant 20 foot thick concrete wall between you and all your friends who you can't share any of it with without an extra fee. It will make sure your Xbox is always up to date and ready for you, like meeting every ex you ever had at a party, who then stalk you for the next year, posting comments on your Facebook about what a whore you were, and a cheater -- that gaming is better with smart, quick and intuitive multiplayer, unlike everything else on the market which can accomplish this basic feat without spying on you, whoring away your personal viewing habits, and knowing exactly when you're about to climax on the couch to post that new advertisement for Buxom Babes 7, backed by the new Smart Match system -- which is just like online dating, only creepier. It adds even more personalization to your TV and entertainment, because what's more entertaining and personal than sitting alone, in your basement, your friends unable to join you to play without paying an extra fee? Nothing, that's what! With the evolved Xbox Live, your games and profile are stored in the cloud, so you can access them from any Xbox One console, and we'd appreciate it a lot if you'd forget about what we've done with Sidekick, and every other Cloud platform we've absorbed like some Doctor Who alien, only with less wit and British charm.... this time will be different. We Promise(tm).

    Q: I saw reports stating friends will be unlimited and reports saying the cap is 1,000. Which is correct?

    A: We're excited to report it's the lower of the two, which shouldn't discourage you in any way... because we've tried very hard to match the same low standards that are already present in the industry with our next generation console!

    Q: Do I have to pay to access Xbox Live?

    A: No. We'll just be collecting your personal viewing habits and selling them to the lowest bidder.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Herp Derp Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: Do I have to pay to access Xbox Live? A: No. We'll just be collecting your personal viewing habits and selling them to the lowest bidder.

      Oh, is this XBOXONE a Google product. They are in the habit of rummaging through the underwear drawers when providing "free services".

    2. Re:Herp Derp Derp by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      9.5/10. Would read again.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Herp Derp Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have to pay for Xbox Live?

      Only if you want to use 99% of the features we keep beating you over the head with.

    4. Re:Herp Derp Derp by burningcpu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Weird, most of the posts I've read from GirlinTraining have been interesting and well received by slashdot. Enough so that I remember her/his name. I can't say the same for either of you. Maybe you should try to contribute to the discussion rather than throwing stones?

      On that note, I'm conflicted about this generation of consoles. I skipped the last generation entirely and was hoping update my aging PS2, but I certainly won't abide an always on type requirement. That leaves Sony's offering, but with their history I can't trust that they change their policy in a year or two after they eat Microsoft's lunch.

      What this means for me, and I'm sure quite a few other people, is that I'm going to delay purchasing any console until the water looks less muddied. Or not. I already have a perfectly capable PC. If the console manufacturers can't make their experience easier and more convenient than a PC in the livingroom, well, why even use a console?

    5. Re:Herp Derp Derp by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't get the Netflix app for free on my Xbox 360 without paying for Live. Go figure. Good thing my TV, DVR, Wii and 4 Android devices have the Netflix app for free.

      Not that I would use it for Netflix, anyway. The fan is too whiny and loud when it's on to watch movies.

    6. Re:Herp Derp Derp by wichawa · · Score: 1

      Don't know who you are but you have had some thoroughly entertaining posts throughout this thread...

    7. Re:Herp Derp Derp by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Weird, most of the posts I've read from GirlinTraining have been interesting and well received by slashdot. Enough so that I remember her/his name. I can't say the same for either of you. Maybe you should try to contribute to the discussion rather than throwing stones?

      Ah, who was it that said, "if ever a genius should appear you shall know them by this sign: That all the dunces will be in alliance against them." I take the hate mail in stride... if I'm not hated, I'm doing something wrong -- people only start throwing stones, throwing hissy fits, and generally behaving badly, when you start getting close to the truth. Given that almost all of my posts get at least a few "-1, Too Close For Comfort" mods and crap like this, I must be the most honest bitch out there.

      Well, okay, at least the snarkiest though. Give me that atleast, right? ;)

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:Herp Derp Derp by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      All it means is you need to go back and buy a PS3 or Xbox360 or Wii on discount. You may not get the latest games, but the game catalogs are pretty filled out at this time.

      And it you haven't played a game, it's new to you.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    9. Re:Herp Derp Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about the AC comment, but I spent mod points in this discussion. "noh8rz10" is just a nobody who do not accept that people can have direct and honest opinions (even harsh) on any subject.

    10. Re:Herp Derp Derp by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Well, okay, at least the snarkiest though. Give me that atleast, right? ;)

      I think you know well that it would be disingenuous to suggest that you lack massive competition on that front here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Herp Derp Derp by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 0

      "I would like to hope that Slashdot is a bit more mature than that."

      Dude, have you even *read* Slashdot in the last year?

    12. Re:Herp Derp Derp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, most of the posts I've read from GirlinTraining have been interesting and well received by slashdot. Enough so that I remember her/his name.

      She goes on and on about being a girl and you can't remember her gender but boast about remembering her name. Says a lot about you.

  8. Missing question by alantus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    101. Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One?

    1. Re:Missing question by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The iPad costs the same, and you can't run your software on it.
      I don't see what the price has to do with that.

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:Missing question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol no.

    3. Re:Missing question by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      well you can run whatever iOS software you want on your ipad, including any you write yourself. so I would say Yes, you can run your own software on the ipad. on the other hand, you can also run a wide variety of software (games) on XBone, presumably you could write one yourself if you want, so the answer is yes there too.

    4. Re:Missing question by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      The iPad costs the same, and you can't run your software on it. I don't see what the price has to do with that.

      You can run your own software on the iPad - you just have to pay $99/year for the privilege.

    5. Re:Missing question by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      101. Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One?

      Today Microsoft Studios and the world's biggest and most renowned publishers, including 343 Industries, Crytek, Turn 10 Studios, Capcom and Insomniac Games, unveiled their blockbuster games lineup for Xbox One, with more exclusive titles than at any time in the history of Xbox. We're excited to share more about our complete launch portfolio over the coming weeks and months.

      101. Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One?

      Similar to Xbox 360, Xbox Live on Xbox One is free to any system owner with a broadband Internet connection and includes access to a robust catalog of gaming content on Xbox Marketplace and personal profiles.

      101. Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One?

      We're in continued discussions with a broad set of content providers and owners but we don't have anything to announce at this time.

      101. Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One?

      I exorcise thee, every unclean spirit, in the name of Ballmer the Father, and in the name of Microsoft, our lord and judge, and in the power of the Holy Console, that thou depart from this creature of Consumer which our Lord has designed to call unto his Holy temple. I cast out you noxious vermin, through the same Christ our Lord, who shall come to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:Missing question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS has a completely legit and even supported way to run your own software. anyone who wants this can sign up for a dev account, getting code on after that is typically apple-style trivial.

    7. Re:Missing question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe *you* can't.

    8. Re:Missing question by TheEgolf · · Score: 2

      Haha, you're adorable! Thinking you own hardware (or software) that you paid for...

    9. Re:Missing question by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The iPad costs the same, and you can't run your software on it.
      I don't see what the price has to do with that.

      You may also note, I dont own one of those either.

      I have a gaming PC and a Nexus 7 because fsck anyone who thinks that they control my devices.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Missing question by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      well you can run whatever iOS software you want on your ipad, including any you write yourself.

      Assuming you pay $99.

    11. Re:Missing question by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Did I say you own the iPad or that you own the Xbox One(which isn't even out yet so how can you own it)? Who cares what you own which is totally irrevelant to the conversation at hand. You may be a Luddite and Amish for all I care.

      --
      This space for rent.
    12. Re:Missing question by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      $99 for access to the largest software distribution system int he world. sounds like a pretty good deal. unless you live in a developing country, surely your investment of time dwarfs this $99 fee.

    13. Re:Missing question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A: If you paid $500 for it, why should Microsoft think you'd do /anything/ sensible?

    14. Re:Missing question by mjwx · · Score: 0

      The only thing that post has proven is you're a complete idiot who has no idea what they are on about.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:Missing question by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In Addendum to pointing out that you're an idiot, you also missed the point I and the OP were trying to make, price is immaterial as the corporate restrictions are the reason we are not purchasing these items.

      You focused on price, when restrictions were the subject of the post. You missed this twice.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:Missing question by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      Ask someone else to read the thread and they can tell you if your post makes any sense.

      --
      This space for rent.
    17. Re:Missing question by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2

      Re-read the OP post.
      Here it is again.

      Since I would have to pay 500$ for it, will I be able to run my own software on the Xbox One.

      Now if you claim that OP says money is immaterial, take an English and a Reading Comprehension course before posting again.
      Also, no one cares what you buy or don't, iPad and iPhone are selling tens of millions every quarter. Buy as many Raspberry Pis as you want.

      --
      This space for rent.
    18. Re: Missing question by GreatDrok · · Score: 0

      iPad vs XBone huh? OK, how about a usable web browser that isn't tied to a subscription. Email and calendar clients plus other useful apps. Then there's the App Store where many apps a d games are free and others often cost about a buck. Compare that with the XBone which requires a live subscription to access services you've already paid for (Netflix) or just to use the web browser. Chock full of adverts and a UI that is an appalling piece of crap that has already been rejected (Metro) and games (the main purpose of the system in theory) which cost so much it is beyond stupid and you can't even guarantee that you'll be able to trade them. The reason Steam is acceptable is because the games cost far less a d are tied to your account so they move between machines as long as you've logged in. iPad apps are so cheap the device is useful far beyond the initial cost and again the apps move around. I have two iPads and an iPhone and the apps I purchase are available on all of them. The XBone takes way too many freedoms away at too high a cost.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  9. LISTEN UP !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is trying to accomplish something here !! Cut it some slack !! It is not like Linux would ever be on even a hundredth the number of devices this game machine will sell !! So eat meat and stick a finger down it L.A.M.O.s because X Box One is gonna be rammed down your throats !!

    1. Re:LISTEN UP !! by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Android/Linux is currently moving half a billion hardware units a year. To do over 100 times that you would have to sell more than 15 to every living human - almost half of whom live on $1/day.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  10. Q: How many games do you plan to ship at launch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: Today Microsoft Studios and the world’s biggest and most renowned publishers, including 343 Industries, Crytek, Turn 10 Studios, Capcom and Insomniac Games, unveiled their blockbuster games lineup for Xbox One, with more exclusive titles than at any time in the history of Xbox. We’re excited to share more about our complete launch portfolio over the coming weeks and months.

    No numbers, you think by now they'd have the lineup mostly decided..........

    This thing is 100% weasel speak.

  11. Nothing particularly wrong with the Q&A, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole setup is creepy. It's like Microsoft wants customers in their stores to see these young, hip, techies-but-not-nerds who happen to work for Microsoft. But then Redmond doesn't trust them (or the field organization) to think or recall training when they're asked questions, so we have this call center-type script that everyone is supposed to master so they're all on the same page.

    Why didn't MS just post the contents on their web site?

  12. XBone Fake FAQ by realitycheckplease · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm going to call this a Fake Faq. It doesn't read like a corporate MS document, it reads to me like the best attempt of someone who doesn't write any sort of Corporate PR at all and is about as close to Redmond as (broadly speaking) the width of the Pacific Ocean to try and mimic what they think Corporate American English PR would be written like, and they got it very wrong. Having said that, I'm sure that in the environment that I suspect this fake faq document was produced in, it's likely to be widely accepted as gospel by those who want to believe such things. In the primarily English speaking world, I think anyone with an understanding of grammar and linguistics at the level of an average 13 year old would spot that it's a fake faq straight away.

    1. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been paying attention to Microsoft's product line up lately have you?

    2. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a bit too long for a troll document, and a just sufficiently corporate-speakish to be real. Teen trolls don't have the language skills to produce a document like that, while adult trolls don't have the time and patience to get over that many points.

      It also doesn't look like a collaboration because the writing style stays the same throughout the document.

      All in all, it has a very good chance of being a real thing.

    3. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to call this a Fake Faq. It doesn't read like a corporate MS document, it reads to me like the best attempt of someone who doesn't write any sort of Corporate PR at all and is about as close to Redmond as (broadly speaking) the width of the Pacific Ocean to try and mimic what they think Corporate American English PR would be written like, and they got it very wrong.

      Having said that, I'm sure that in the environment that I suspect this fake faq document was produced in, it's likely to be widely accepted as gospel by those who want to believe such things. In the primarily English speaking world, I think anyone with an understanding of grammar and linguistics at the level of an average 13 year old would spot that it's a fake faq straight away.

      It's impressive how much you managed to write without actually saying anything. Everything in there is arm-waving, no pointing out specific flaws, just weasel word "anyone can see it's fake" and "the person who wrote it knows nothing about Microsoft" without a single example or citation to back that up.

      The FAQ is supposed to be an internal document that tells people receiving questions about the Xbone how to respond to specific questions, not to be posted publically. Your post doesn't even address that, I honestly can't tell if you think it isn't a press release, you were that vague.

    4. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being a regular receiver of such corporate PR messages I can honestly say it looks fake. If it is real then it is written by morons which given their PR machine so far makes it possible. FAQ's for PR are nearly always short and precise with anything longer than half a dozen to a dozen questions having an answer of "please see our online official message" as the people being asked these questions can't honestly be expected to memorise and correctly parrot that many answers, it leads to confused messages, mistakes and pissed off people.

    5. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by realitycheckplease · · Score: 1

      There's repeated incidents of phrasing in the document that gramatically and linguistically just doesn't read right for American English Corporate Speak. It contains phrases that read as if they've been translated from English into a different language and back again, and that's not how Corporate America produces their PR documents!

    6. Re:XBone Fake FAQ by realitycheckplease · · Score: 1

      It doesn't read real to a native english speaker. To a native english speaker it reads like something that's been mangled through translation software with south-east asian grammatical constructs. So again - I call this as a fake, and consider that it most likely came from South Korea or Japan. However, it's not a Sony generated fake, because a Sony generated fake would be more intelligently produced than this - it would use normal english grammatical constructs.

  13. It will still succeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will still succeed, because Micro$oft is willing to throw more than a billion dollars of marketing at it to make sure it succeeds.

    And there are plenty of assholes who will buy it, if for no other reason than to play Halo and the latest DOA Beach Volleyball game.

    1. Re:It will still succeed by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Throwing money after a console doesn't mean it will be successful.

      Nintendo certainly spent money on marketing for the Virtual Boy, and Sega had a big push for the Saturn and the Dreamcast, two consoles that failed to really catch on. Same with the Jaguar (although Atari certainly wasn't in the same shape that Nintendo and Sega were). Same with the 3DO.

      Undoubtedly the Xbox one won't be a complete failure the way some consoles were (N-Gage, CDi, etc.) but I highly doubt that it will be the smash success the 360 is.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:It will still succeed by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You mean like WP7/8? They are burning about a billion yearly on nokia fees alone with actual marketing costs on top of that.

    3. Re:It will still succeed by Dereck1701 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Insane amounts of money can move a bad product, but it does not ensure it will be a successful product. Just look at Zune, Microsoft threw money at that hand over fist but they still weren't able to gain a significant market share. The most they achieved with their marketing blitz was 10%, their market share plummeted after that, roughly halving every year until they gave up and mothballed the brand.

    4. Re:It will still succeed by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      They mothballed it because the world moved onto smartphones for playing music. WP7's music player was called zune and the interface was heavily derived from it too.

      --
      This space for rent.
    5. Re:It will still succeed by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Yeah! The fact that the Zune didn't sell doesn't matter, because they moved it all to a smartphone that...also...didn't...sell. Um.

    6. Re:It will still succeed by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      So they embedded Zune into their phone OS so they could say it "evolved" its way there rather than being a colossal failure. But then the phone OS also hasn't done well, so what can they do now? Put their phone OS interface into their Desktop OS to save face? ;)

  14. Economies of scale by tepples · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I care about the broadband internet requirement since I live where none is available. I know we are a minority, but there are millions of us.

    Tens of millions of urbanites are more profitable than millions of ruralites.

    1. Re:Economies of scale by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure knowing that is going to make the millions of ruralites feel much better about the situation knowing they're taking one for the team.

    2. Re:Economies of scale by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tens of millions of urbanites are more profitable than millions of ruralites.

      But without the phoning home requirement, you'd get some of those millions of "ruralites" to buy an XBox One.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re: Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is when you have friends in rural that buy it and you want to play a game with them most of the time you need the same console. This is going to cause big problems.

    4. Re: Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's not. Buy the PS4 and it's all sorted.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't get the point of his message: if you aren't urban, fuck off.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He gets it. The point is why alienate millions of customers unnecessarily? Why would you want to write off 10-20% of your potential market (and piss off 50%) before you even start competing with Sony?

      It really is a poser. What is MS getting out of it other than pissing off customers? "Most" Xbox360 owners have an xbox live account now, and "most" xbox 360 customers have a broadband connection, so MS can do whatever it has planned with those guys anyway. Why would it want to just give up the sales on the minority that doesn't?

    7. Re: Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 1

      XBone has a terriffic solution for this problem. It's called a "Van". Go get them and bring them to your home. Maybe then you can get them to eat and wash as well.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re: Economies of scale by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      No, that's not the problem. As another follow-up rightly pointed out, broadband is a prerequisite for most online gaming.

      The problem is that those friends in rural are locked out from console gaming at all. Well, that's one of the problems, anyway.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    9. Re: Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft sells some trackballs that are right-hand only. It doesn't bother them to throw away 15% of the trackball market - which may be more because creative types tend to be lefties.

    10. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't get the point of his message: if you aren't urban, fuck off.

      Suburbanites and ruralites aren't numerous enough to move Microsoft's needle. So fuck off.

      Does it need to be more clear? Fuck the fuck off? Go away? You're not needed here?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:Economies of scale by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And yet more than a few of those urbanites are going to say "WTF?" on the phone home requirement and the "friend brought a game over and we can't play it". Actually, the latter will be first, followed by the "can't migrate games to a new console when the old one dies in 3 months" followed by the "what's this phone home requirement?"

      Word of mouth passes fast, and the stink on this one will kill it. You'd think they'd learned something from Vista and Win8. Guess not.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Urban" is the polite way of saying "slum dweller".

    13. Re:Economies of scale by yotto · · Score: 2

      They ran 2 (or likely 2 million) situations through some great combonator. In situation A, they don't phone home every 24 hours and more people can buy the box, but publishers get mad that they can't impose draconian DRM. In situation B, they do phone home every 24 hours and less people can buy the box, but the publishers are happier. Situation B made them more money in spite of losing them customers, so that's what they went with.

      What I think they may have failed to take into account is those of us who have broadband but won't buy the box anyway because of this.

    14. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. If you're urban and poor, also "fuck off". XBox One is for the discerning and successful urban professional.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    15. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Why don't we go ahead and narrow the scope a little more: if you aren't something like Microsoft's Seattle-based Xbox development team, with a solid situation in a Fortune 500 company, and share interests with them, then Fuck off. You're too poor to understand the marvelous potentials this could bring.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    16. Re: Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to play online, with someone who isn't online? You have bigger problems than choice of console.

    17. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're giving them too much credit. There's a conference room and competing teams of world-class geniuses come to show their deal they've honed all year. Every one is fucking fabulous, world-shaking shit. And the Decider whips out his dick, pisses on all of them, and randomly picks one because he doesn't have to give a fuck. Then he hands it off to marketing, who fucks it up.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    18. Re:Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is MS getting out of it other than pissing off customers?

      Government protection.

      The whole thing is a TLA's wet dream, always connected, software controlled cameras and microphones facing out, stored credit card details and more. And it's all owned by a company that's totally willing to "share" data with all the US surveillance groups. It such a common practice they gave it the in-house nickname of "Hoovering" not just because of J Edgar, but also because of the huge amount of personal information being siphoned out.

      Just Google it if you want to be disgusted.

    19. Re:Economies of scale by BigZee · · Score: 1

      I don't think you would. In principle, MS want you to have a decent internet connection because they want you to see the Xbox as more than just a games console. At the very least, they want you to take advantage of multi-player gaming but most likely they also want you to take advantage of the non-gaming aspects of the console. To be frank, I think they're pretty much saying that if you don't have a reliable internet service, they don't want you as a customer. Pretty arrogant I agree but I think that's along the right lines.

    20. Re:Economies of scale by Ash-Fox · · Score: 0

      They should take a stand and demand better Internet.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    21. Re: Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the creative ones buy macs....

    22. Re:Economies of scale by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      MS want you to have a decent internet connection because they want you to see the Xbox as more than just a games console.

      Well, then I guess there's a fundamental misunderstanding over the producer/consumer relationship.

      Who cares what Microsoft wants? It's not about what THEY want, it's about what the consumer wants.

      And let's not BS. Microsoft doesn't "want you to have a decent internet connection" at all. They don't care about your bandwidth. You could probably use a dialup and as long as Microsoft has its hooks in you to see that you're not using your XBONE in some unapproved way they don't care.

      "Microsoft wants..." I like that.

      To be frank, I think they're pretty much saying that if you don't have a reliable internet service, they don't want you as a customer.

      That's not what they're saying at all. If you only have an internet connection on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 4am to 5am guess what, Microsoft still wants you to buy an XBONE and they'll let you play it during those hours. C'mon, you don't really believe Microsoft cares about how reliable your internet service is, do you? When you go to the store to buy an XBONE are you going to have to prove that your service is reliable before they'll let you swipe your credit card? "Sorry, your ping rates are too high, you can't buy an XBONE". I don't think so.

      All Microsoft cares about is control. Not even for the profit on the XBONEs themselves, but for the future control that having that plugged-in consuming/spying device in your house.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re:Economies of scale by greythax · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are incomplete. According to the 2010 census, 17.7% of the population of the U.S. is rural. That is somewhere around 50 million potential customers. MS would have to be idiots to throw away that profit stream without a way of making it up with something else. Like, say, getting a slice of the resale market. This lock down is just MS trying to tax the resale market, and get at that sweet, sweet free money. Or as I like to call it, douchery.

    24. Re:Economies of scale by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If you're poor, you really shouldn't be spending $500 on a console plus $60 on games.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    25. Re:Economies of scale by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      Jobs...is that you?

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    26. Re: Economies of scale by alexo · · Score: 1

      How quickly we forget.

    27. Re: Economies of scale by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      the creative ones buy macs....

      The really creative ones build their own systems and roll their own kernels.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Economies of scale by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      They ran 2 (or likely 2 million) situations through some great combonator. In situation A, they don't phone home every 24 hours and more people can buy the box, but publishers get mad that they can't impose draconian DRM. In situation B, they do phone home every 24 hours and less people can buy the box, but the publishers are happier. Situation B made them more money in spite of losing them customers, so that's what they went with.

      As symbolist already said, you are definitely giving Microsoft too much credit. I guarantee there's some team leader who came up with a great Powerpoint presentation on "always on" connectivity and it got kicked upstairs and then some C-level exec talked to a Hollywood exec at a party over a soup bowl full of coke and it became a "strategic" idea with "synergy" and "legs".

      God, if they could only concentrate enough to hold "situation A" and "situation B" in their heads at the same time they might be more than a hated leviathan that even their most avid customers hate most of the time.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:Economies of scale by Leggman · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a town of 3,000 and I can honestly say that the rural people are in more need of entertainment options...

      --
      You don't eat crackers in the bed of your future or you get all...scratchy! - The Tick
    30. Re:Economies of scale by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I don't think you would. In principle, MS want you to have a decent internet connection because they want you to see the Xbox as more than just a games console. At the very least, they want you to take advantage of multi-player gaming but most likely they also want you to take advantage of the non-gaming aspects of the console.

      No, that's just the bullshit rationalisation of the decision. If XBox One worked without an Internet connection, it would still be more than a games console for those people who have got an Internet connection.

      I'd speculate that the real reason is more about DRM. It's about moving the users' perception of the games to being a service that they buy/rent, not an object that they buy and can resell/lend to somebody else like they can with a CD or a book. That way, Microsoft can sell more stuff.

      To be frank, I think they're pretty much saying that if you don't have a reliable internet service, they don't want you as a customer. Pretty arrogant I agree but I think that's along the right lines.

      I think this is true.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    31. Re:Economies of scale by Thanus · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree with your analysis and I'm proud to be one of those not taken into account.

      --
      8D CB F5 32 BE 2C 49 E9 B5 4A 75 C8 8A 59 70. It's mine, all mine!
    32. Re:Economies of scale by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      Your games won't be attached to a console but attached to your account. If you want to play that game at a friend's house just log in to their box and play all you want. Also claiming that you have to start a new xbox live account when your xbox dies? Get your shit straight.
      Oh yea, and fuck consoles, all of them.

    33. Re:Economies of scale by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No, they've taken it into account all right. They've also factored in the number of slashdot style geeks that will rage about the requirements, but already have a preorder and will be standing in line at midnight on day one anyway. Gamers aren't known for sticking to their principles.

      Personally, I prefer to be upfront. I'll buy one, cause from my perspective it looks like a damn good media centre PC. PS4 looks more like the gaming device... for now.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    34. Re:Economies of scale by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And if you're that poor, fuck off. You are too poor to appreciate the thing anyway. Go play with some rocks and mud.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  15. Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by tepples · · Score: 1

    How does the achievable graphical complexity of the GPU in the Tegra 3 SOC of this "Ouya" console compare to that of the Latte GPU in Nintendo's Wii U?

    1. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      How does the achievable graphical complexity of the GPU in the Tegra 3 SOC of this "Ouya" console compare to that of the Latte GPU in Nintendo's Wii U?

      What's interesting and/or unfortunate about Tegra 3, depending on your point of view, is that it doesn't have a lot of GPU. More than Wii, probably less than Wii U. It has been described as being similar to [original] Xbox-level graphics, but it's actually rendering at 1080p whereas the Xbox was operating at much lower resolutions. Also, the Tegra 3 games have more graphical effects than other titles; the Xbox didn't have the visual effects the Ouya does.

      What's great about it is that it has an assload of CPU. Apple's A5X benchmarks faster (graphically) than the Tegra 3, but the Tegra 3 beats it soundly about the head, neck, and shoulders when it comes to CPU performance. And meanwhile, the Tegra 3 has higher visual quality; it renders effects that don't even show up on the A5X.

      I have yet to find any direct comparison between the two platforms. Presumably it would take a lot of work to get a specific OpenGL benchmark running on the Wii U.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by tepples · · Score: 2

      [Ouya] doesn't have a lot of GPU. More than Wii, probably less than Wii U. It has been described as being similar to [original] Xbox-level graphics, but it's actually rendering at 1080p whereas the Xbox was operating at much lower resolutions.

      So in other words, it's comparable to Dolphin, which emulates a Wii but upscales the graphics.

      What's great about it is that it has an assload of CPU.

      But does it beat the 3-core PowerPC G3 in the Wii U? And even so, what would "an assload of CPU" provide to major video game developers to get them to develop for Ouya rather than Wii U?

    3. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by somersault · · Score: 1

      Why is anyone still asking questions like this?Graphical complexity is not the main consideration for most people. Look at the original Wii, or any mobile game (though even mobiles can do some pretty impressive stuff these days). The real question should be "how do the games available for Ouya compare to those of the other consoles"..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But does it beat the 3-core PowerPC G3 in the Wii U? And even so, what would "an assload of CPU" provide to major video game developers to get them to develop for Ouya rather than Wii U?

      It may well, since those are pretty weak sauce crippled PPC cores and these are the best ARM cores that were available at the time. (There's no question whether PPC or ARM is more powerful in the high end, but we're not talking about that, as you well know.) But the only things that might reasonably attract a developer away from Wii U to Ouya would be installed base among their prospective audience, which will take time to build if ever, and cost of initial entry. If they already make Wii games, it makes sense to continue making Wii games. If they already make Android games, then adding Ouya-specific features (or at least Ouya compatibility) is a no-brainer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by tepples · · Score: 1

      Graphical complexity is not the main consideration for most people.

      If it weren't at least a major consideration, then there would be no need for a PS2 after the PS1 came out, or for a Genesis after the Master System came out. To exaggerate a bit, there's a reason that people play on an Xbox 360 and not an NES.

      Look at the original Wii, or any mobile game (though even mobiles can do some pretty impressive stuff these days).

      Mobile games tend to be simplistic not only because of the short play sessions but also because of the input device. Anything other than point-and-click doesn't work well on a flat sheet of glass.

      The real question should be "how do the games available for Ouya compare to those of the other consoles"

      And if this comparison ends up saying "Ouya games look like Atari 2600 games compared to Xbox One and PS4 games", then which console are gamers more likely to buy?

    6. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If it weren't at least a major consideration, then there would be no need for a PS2 after the PS1 came out, or for a Genesis after the Master System came out.

      Reductio ad absurdum. The difference is that none of the games previewed for this generation could not have been done on the consoles of the prior generation. This generation is hugely underwhelming compared to every prior leap in perceived quality.

      And if this comparison ends up saying "Ouya games look like Atari 2600 games compared to Xbox One and PS4 games", then which console are gamers more likely to buy?

      Compare and contrast sales figures for Nintendo vs. other consoles.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Ouya vs. Wii U graphics by somersault · · Score: 1

      If it weren't at least a major consideration, then there would be no need for a PS2 after the PS1 came out,

      As drinkypoo said, you're going too far there. The PS2 was part of the first console generation that could handle large yet relatively complex open-world 3D games without having to wait for new areas to load (basically, GTA III: San Andreas).

      Games machines could still do with more processing power, but not just so that we can have prettier graphics. The interesting advancements in games these days are in areas like physical realism and destructible/modifiable objects and environments, rather than graphical style.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  16. Which $400 gaming PC? by tepples · · Score: 0

    My cousin currently owns an Xbox 360 and likes to play Call of Duty series, Battlefield series, and similar first-person shooters. He has rejected the Xbox One and is trying to decide between a PlayStation 4 console and a new gaming PC this December. Which $400 gaming PC that can play games with comparable graphics to forthcoming PS4 games would you recommend?

    1. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by JDeane · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can get a gaming PC for about $400 but it will be entry level, when it comes to PC's better to spend at least a little bit more and get something that will last a while.

      This one is $529 and is more than a match for the new generation of consoles.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883229285

      The biggest thing about investing in the price difference on a gaming PC is that when your not playing games, you can do a LOT of other things on a PC. So the price difference is more than made up for.

      All this being said, I am lucky and have enough money to do both, I tend to buy 2 consoles from each gen and keep a gaming PC around. This will be the first gen I do not buy at least 2 of the consoles at launch. I own a Wii-U and I don't plan on getting a Xbox One, I also do not trust Sony enough to pick up a PS4 at launch my PS3 was not a good experience for me... Always seems like I spend more time updating the firmware than actually playing it.

    2. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Which $400 gaming PC that can play games with comparable graphics to forthcoming PS4 games would you recommend?"

      One built yourself.

      A10-5800K with 8GB RAM costs me.... $247.90 free shipping and before taxes.

      Barebones System
      8GB RAM

      If I decided to drop the extra $150 on a better GPU than the 7660D included in the A10, then you could get a GTX560 and be set to go. Or snag dual GTX460s for the same price.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend google. You may have to spend a little more than 400 up front, but you save a lot in the long run on game prices (not to mention the ability to upgrade and get better stuff when you want, not ten years from now).

    4. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by tepples · · Score: 0

      Which $400 gaming PC

      I'd recommend google.

      I thought the Chromebook could only run simple little web games, not AAA first-person shooters. Or are major video game developers taking Native Client + WebGL seriously? Perhaps you meant Google Search, but in my experience, I haven't been able to get Google Search to assess the reliability of a particular source.

      [with PC] you save a lot in the long run on game prices

      Not necessarily. PC versions of a game tend to support fewer players per copy of the game than console versions, which becomes important when this cousin has classmates over to visit. True, some products have abandoned split-screen, but recent Call of Duty games for Xbox 360 still support two players.

      not to mention the ability to upgrade and get better stuff when you want

      Except by the time it's time to replace a CPU, there's usually a new socket, which means a new motherboard and probably new RAM.

    5. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      For about $100 I can get a nice Android gaming tablet. Quad core, 1080p, all the neat games I've already bought.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      My cousin currently owns an Xbox 360 and likes to play Call of Duty series, Battlefield series, and similar first-person shooters. He has rejected the Xbox One and is trying to decide between a PlayStation 4 console and a new gaming PC this December. Which $400 gaming PC that can play games with comparable graphics to forthcoming PS4 games would you recommend?

      The PS4 is yet to provide the same graphical experience as my 2009 vintage PC. Along with this, the TCO for a PC is lower. over 3 years you'll spend more on games for your console than you would on buying a decent PC and the same games.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Look, I love Android, but tablet games are still shit. Indeed, the only time I ever play them is while on the toilet.

    8. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should spend less time on the toilet and check some shit out. But first, wash your hands.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      graphics wise that machine is significantly BEHIND both the PS4 and the Xbox One, you can spend a bit more and get something equivalent or perhaps $100 more and get something a little better though.

    10. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man I am a PC gamer first and foremost, but the machine you pointed to gets shit on by both of the next gen console. That machine only has a 6670 in it, both consoles have considerably better graphics capabilities in hardware alone and that is only magnified in the dedicated scenario that consoles are built for. You can easily build a machine that beats those consoles, but you need to add a little more cash which is hardly surprising considering the low margins they sell consoles at.

    11. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously not an urbanite. We professional and successful persons have dedicated bottom, hand, and tablet washers for our gaming time. We're far to busy snorting blow off hookers tits, to be gaming if we aren't pinching a loaf.

    12. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      You can get a gaming PC for about $400 but it will be entry level, when it comes to PC's better to spend at least a little bit more and get something that will last a while.

      While if he is building from scratch I agree but one of the major advantages of PCs is that you rarely have to do that if you are smart about it. (And one would hope that the person in question either can DIY or knows someone who can given that this is a /. post.)

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    13. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Would it not make more sense to wash one's hands *after* checking out the shit?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    14. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS4 has an OS to actually do something with its hardware. Your build does not.

      It also has BD.

      So you can't afford a better GPU on your build and that GPU can't even run current AAA titles at 1080p

      That's just the way it is on console release day. You have to wait for PC tech to make the console obsolete.

    15. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Which $100 quad-core 1080p android tablet is worth one tenth of one shit?

      You can get Ouya for $100, or will be able to in a week or so. Launch day is in a week and a day. I am slightly excited, though not giddy in the way I was over a new console back in the day, as you might imagine. I think this is actually literally the only console I've ever preordered. I bought the Playstation (original) when it was still A Thing, but every other console I've owned has been purchased after the first price drop, or later. My first game console was a Coleco Telstar which was bought used, then I had a NES, and from there straight to the Amiga 500, also after the first price drop (to $599 with chessmaster and an RF adapter.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Except by the time it's time to replace a CPU, there's usually a new socket, which means a new motherboard and probably new RAM.

      For intel, probably is true. For AMD, it's probably about fifty-fifty. You might well get a significant improvement in the same socket, with the same memory; I literally doubled my cores, and the cores are just as good (better!) and just as fast. And it literally cost the same as buying the original CPU, so it's functionally equivalent to buying a second CPU and dropping it in a second socket that I didn't have to pay for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      My cousin currently owns an Xbox 360 and likes to play Call of Duty series, Battlefield series, and similar first-person shooters. He has rejected the Xbox One and is trying to decide between a PlayStation 4 console and a new gaming PC this December. Which $400 gaming PC that can play games with comparable graphics to forthcoming PS4 games would you recommend?

      I play those games myself and looking forward to Battlefield 4 this winter. A PC is the best choice I feel and what I use.
      I tried the Battlefield3 Beta on the PS3 and just didn't care for it at all.

      Playing these games you can talk to others say your Squad or clan members; a helicopter pilot and gunner are a deadly pair if they
      can talk to each other. The Playstation has just the one avenue I believe to chat to each other, The PC has three I can think of off hand Sonar by Dice,
      Team Speak and Ventrilo. (all free) an example showing how much more versatile the PC is.

      The PS4 will require a PS+ Subscription of around $5 (US) a month to play online, "roughly the same as an Xbox Live Gold subscription."
      http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124821-PS4-Online-Multiplayer-Requires-PS-Subscription

      The PC, no subscription required, just an Internet connection.

    18. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Which $400 gaming PC that can play games with comparable graphics to forthcoming PS4 games would you recommend?

      Forgot to answer you, $400 might purchase the video card. I built mine and my sons both for less than $1100 each.
      almost everything through www.Newegg.com.

      Searching on Newegg.com for "Gaming computer" shows systems from $500 to $1700
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100019096%20600030537&IsNodeId=1&name=Gaming%20%26%20Entertainment&Tpk=gaming%20computer%20system

      But again you can save a lot if you/he were to build it yourself.

    19. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by organgtool · · Score: 1

      The PS4 has faster memory, a better GPU, and a more efficient architecture between the CPU and GPU. And your price didn't include the price of the Windows license. And you can not buy and sell used games with the PC. Don't get me wrong, that PC is a very impressive machine for the money, but you can't quite say it's exactly the same.

    20. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really get a gaming PC to match the PS4 for $400 - you need to get one with slightly more powerful hardware to account for the fact that the PS4 games are written closer to the hardware/with just one hardware target. Still, a little over $600 as shown below is slightly more powerful to way more powerful, and I will guarantee will be able to match or beat PS4/Xbox One in multi-platform games released on the PC.

      PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/17mnM
      Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/17mnM/by_merchant/
      Benchmarks: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/17mnM/benchmarks/

      CPU: Intel Core i5-3350P 3.1GHz Quad-Core Processor ($169.99 @ NCIX US)
      Motherboard: ECS H77H2-M3(1.0) Micro ATX LGA1155 Motherboard ($56.98 @ Newegg)
      Memory: Corsair Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1866 Memory ($57.60 @ NCIX US)
      Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($54.99 @ NCIX US)
      Video Card: Asus GeForce GTX 660 2GB Video Card ($169.00 @ Newegg)
      Case: Fractal Design Core 1000 USB 3.0 MicroATX Mid Tower Case ($24.99 @ NCIX US)
      Power Supply: Corsair Builder 500W 80 PLUS Bronze Certified ATX12V Power Supply ($39.99 @ Newegg)
      Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($37.98 @ Outlet PC)
      Total: $611.52
      (Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
      (Generated by PCPartPicker 2013-06-17 11:47 EDT-0400)

    21. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by adolf · · Score: 1

      For $247.90, it looks you get a case, a power supply, a motherboard, CPU, heatsink, and some slow RAM. It has built-in graphics that, while useful, is probably nothing compared to what will be included with the PS3.

      WTF am I supposed to do with that? That's not a gaming rig; that's a pile of parts.

      Oh, I see. And I'm supposed to spend another $150 on a GPU. So now it's a $400 box with no storage, and no optical drive.

      BD-ROM drives are, what, $70-ish?

      Now it's $470.

      Add storage, input devices, an operating system, and a game (launch bundles always seem to include a game), and...gosh, it doesn't seem like such a good deal after all, and it integrates poorly into my living room: PC gaming on a couch sucks. Double-suck if you want to play with a friend.

      And when it's all said and done, I still have to administer the thing? My time isn't worth much, but I've got better things to do when I want to play a game than fuck around with drivers and tweak settings, like actually playing a game.

    22. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can do it if you're starting from scratch.. that build you linked to on Newegg doesn't have a good enough video card to actually more than match the new consoles. Sony said their GPU produces 1.8 TFLOPS, whereas the Radeon 6670 in that build produces 768 GFLOPS. That's just one measure of many, of course, but it's the only hard number I've heard about the PS4's GPU performance.

      An $800 gaming PC will beat the consoles pretty easily in terms of power. Of course prices come down pretty quickly in the PC world, so perhaps next year's $529 budget gaming PC will do the trick.

      That said, I agree with you about PCs being the way to go, and most people don't have to start from scratch and the cost of upgrading a few components is a lot lower. A $250 video card upgrade in an otherwise modest PC built in the last few years will probably beat both consoles.

    23. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "So you can't afford a better GPU on your build and that GPU can't even run current AAA titles at 1080p"

      Umm.... my 5770 runs most everything at 1080p, no AA (not that it's needed at that resolution on my monitor when I'm sitting 6 feet away.)

      As for the OS - who pays for an OS, even Windows?

      "You have to wait for PC tech to make the console obsolete."

      Guess you didn't pay attention to the hardware in the consoles versus what is already available today.

      It was already obsolete before either system was ever announced.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    24. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " It has built-in graphics that, while useful, is probably nothing compared to what will be included with the PS3."

      Guess you never bothered to read the rest of my post nor check the full specs. That's not a problem, it just shows your and denial.

      Despite having half of the cores, my current desktop under Windows will still run any of those AAA games at full graphics. How do I know? My old as shit Phenom x4 with 4GB DDR2 and a GTX460 still runs everything at 1080p without any issue.

      You're still thinking gaming companies know how to do anything with multiple threads. Got some news for you...

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by adolf · · Score: 1

      I see that I made a typo there: s/PS3/PS4/

      I trust you'll forgive me as your prose is not exactly the crown jewel of grammatical perfection, either:

      That's not a problem, it just shows your and denial.

      That's not a problem, it just shows that you write phonetically with little regard for what the written words actually mean.

    26. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Between 'your' and 'and' was the word ignorance.

      I deleted it and forgot to remove the 'and' after it.

      And yet you, with your supposedly superior language skills, could not see that?

      Try a little harder when you're directing some research, like myself. Errors of omission or deletion are easy enough to detect if you've got the brains to do such.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That computer has a Radeon 6670, which is only about half as powerful as the two GPUs on the Xbox One. That computer is certainly not "more than a match for the new generation of consoles."

    28. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by adolf · · Score: 1

      It was an illustration of the fact that neither of us are perfect.

      Now, really: Who gives a shit? We've both corrected ourselves.

      If you've some manner of useful point to make, I'm all ears.

    29. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention price of games, I got borderlands 2 for $10. I'd never get that kind of price on a console game. People don't realize Microsoft and Sony are skimming the price of the console in the hopes of making money back in games, which is why they cost so much on consoles in comparison to PC's. You pay a higher flat rate for your PC and pay a lower fee per game than consoles. I guess that's how the world works though, people don't look to the future and if they get an XBone one for cheaper now but end up paying more in the end cause of overpriced games, as long as they don't realize it the wheels will keep spinning for them.

    30. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That PC has no wireless, no blue-tooth, no controller and no blu-ray drive. On top of that, it's $130 more expensive and weaker specced.

      So what you're saying is that if you spend more money, you can get something less powerful than a PS4, with half the components missing, and a bigger, uglier form factor, and no doubt higher power consumption, heat generation and noise?

      Not to mention the PC will be quickly out of date, whilst a console gets more powerful throughout its generation.

    31. Re:Which $400 gaming PC? by JDeane · · Score: 1

      whilst a console gets more powerful throughout its generation.

      I laughed.

      The reason I laughed is that, I believe what you meant to say with out understanding what you where saying...

      The reason graphics improved on the older generation of consoles in ye olde days, was that these where entirely new systems each one had all kinds of quirks to learn the CPU's where not usually the same ones used in PC's the Graphics chips usually where custom jobs same with the sound processors in most machines.

      The PS4 and the Xbox One, are both pretty much PC's, there is no new hardware to learn, the graphics cards are a couple of generations back PC hardware the CPU while new is AMD's weakest CPU currently available so much so that is it even under-clocked for the consoles at 1.6Ghz (You can get them in PC's now they come in the $299 E-Machines with less cores but much higher clocked.) So the software you see on the PS4 and the Xbox One, will see ever so slight improvement as developers "master" the systems but don't expect the giant leap in graphics quality like the PS1 or PS2 enjoyed with later games in the lifespan of those systems making the launch software look bad. That's not going to happen this time.

      What will this mean for PC gaming? Well any sort of console to PC ports will not require much in the way of hardware... Give PC's 2 years and the lowest of the low end E-Machine will be bumping up against the PS4 and Xbox One in terms of power, especially since AMD and Intel are both doing the integrated CPU/GPU thing.

      Long story short, you don't buy a console because your worried about how powerful it is, that's just dumb. Buy a console if you have the extra money and it has some games you really want to play. If you have to pick between owning a PC and a console... get the PC it can do things like "work" and if you happen to spend enough on it you can also play games too, many of the times the exact same games released on the consoles. (Making owning a console seem outright redundant.)

  17. Microsoft will Scroogle you by tepples · · Score: 1

    Q: Do I have to pay to access Xbox Live? A: No. We'll just be collecting your personal viewing habits and selling them to the lowest bidder.

    Oh, is this XBOXONE a Google product.

    And to think Microsoft has been running an ad campaign about how Google reads your Gmail to provide ads and how Google Play Store provides the name, e-mail address, and postal code of anyone who buys a priced Android application to the app's publisher. What a hippopotamus.

  18. Unlimited storage by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Q: How much cloud space do I get? What is stored in the cloud?
    A: Xbox Live offers Xbox One unlimited storage space in the cloud.

    Unlimited storage means unlimited cost, for fixed revenue. It looks like the recipe for disaster

    1. Re:Unlimited storage by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Maybe they mean "unlimited storage" the same way your ISP means "unlimited bandwidth".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Unlimited storage by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      Oh, it's unlimited. The console might just not allow you to use all of it.

    3. Re:Unlimited storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How much cloud space do I get? What is stored in the cloud? A: Xbox Live offers Xbox One unlimited storage space in the cloud.

      Unlimited storage means unlimited cost, for fixed revenue. It looks like the recipe for disaster

      Not really, while storage for a user is unlimited, it isn't like you get to upload into it whatever you want. It is for games, profiles and media that is directly connected to those items. So this would allow them to easily store for instance a single copy of Halo even though 10 million users all store it in the cloud, thus making unlimited space in this scenario quite cheap and easy on a per user basis.

    4. Re:Unlimited storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are they storing in the cloud?
      I saw nothing in that PR spin directive that allows users to upload any actual content to the cloud, just personal data. Which will be mined as sold as desired by MS. The games, video, and other actual content will be added and paid by the developers/distributors. The "GameDVR" stuff is being hosted by a third party (Twitch) and will most likely be ad-supported (like YouTube).

      User added data includes:
      Profile data - a static amount per account
      Gamer Rep & Points - Uh oh numbers, I've heard databases hate those (but my hearing pretty bad)
      Game "Ownership" - might want to read that as "access key to the game file", hey another moderate sized number.
      Achievements - Hmm, so that database with the access keys has to have a TRUE/FALSE field for each achievement in the game.
      Saved game files - This is the big one, but many games already limit the number of save files per user. So they just add that cost into the SDK price and Bob's your uncle.

      Unlimited storage, sure, cause YOU don't have anything stored there. MS has lots of data to mine, most of which you'll never see; which ads you watch, time asleep in front of tv, time spent peeing... ok that might be a bit far :). But think of how netflix stores movies, MS is just going to use that style of storage for content. The SDK will be priced to reflect those costs (discounts/kickbacks available for extra data collection and IP which MS desires for selling the hardware).

      Of course I'm a bit cynical, you might have caught already.

    5. Re:Unlimited storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very little data is actually personal to you on Xbox Live. Any sort of movie or game you buy is just a license to stream/download to your Xbox. It's unlimited storage as in an unlimited purchase history. The only thing that will actually take up any real space is any user-created material like screenshots or gameplay videos. Although I don't recall making more than a handful of those on the Xbox 360 in games that allowed you to record video. Microsoft is planning on bathing in cash from sales so the cost of measly hard drives isn't on their minds right now.

  19. This license will self-destruct in 365 days by tepples · · Score: 0

    well you can run whatever iOS software you want on your ipad, including any you write yourself. so I would say Yes, you can run your own software on the ipad.

    Apart from the intentionally hamstrung Codea and Safari JavaScript environments, you can't run software you write yourself on an iPad. Nor can you run it on the combination of an iPad and your existing PC. You can run it on the combination of an iPad, a Mac (and not any other brand of PC), and a developer certificate that self-destructs after 365 days.

    on the other hand, you can also run a wide variety of software (games) on XBone, presumably you could write one yourself if you want

    Has Microsoft yet announced on what terms the Xbox One devkit is made available to video game developers? I assume it'd require a Windows 8 operating system, but that's not much of an obstacle because Windows 8 is designed to run on just about every x86-64 PC, including a Mac if your company also happens to develop games for iOS or OS X. But historically, console makers haven't been willing to sell a devkit to a video game company for its debut title even if it has shown a feature-complete prototype of this title on PC.

  20. how Sony hate is now MS hate by blackdragon07 · · Score: 1

    Its funny there was an uproar and hate of Sony when they removed install other OS. I Think they will do a 180 and remove the have to call back once every 24 hours because otherwise they lose all military people...that's a big market share to lose for something as stupid as have to call back. Some people are basing this on what they have read and seen from MS direct others are just on the MS hatewaggon without thinking about the reason for it. Stop and think how often do you have your system unplugged from the internet and play the game for those that do. I understand not all have the ability to do so and yes i agree its a bunch of BS but stop and think about it for a moment. most people play multi-player which requires internet and i know for a fact i never unplug my console after playing so whats the big deal? Sony is leaving the DRM to the publishers. The main difference is MS is making everyone have the same DRM where Sony will leave it to others to do the DRM.... They all want a way to control there games and reduce pirated copies and kill off the used game market.

  21. Biased much? by jurco · · Score: 0

    I'm not a fan of DRM either, but this "story" should have one of those "PAID ADVERTISEMENT" disclaimers.

  22. They'll mention games once they pass lot check by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't know what Microsoft calls its counterpart to Nintendo's lot check or Sony's TRC check, but it is dishonorable to announce vaporware that hasn't met whatever Microsoft calls its certification process. Even weasels have to preserve some honor. Once the games go gold, expect Microsoft and the publisher to jointly announce them.

  23. Nerds vs everyone else by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    The thing about the Linux thing is that it really only affected nerds, those who used their PS3 for gaming (which is what the majority of people bought a gaming system for) were mostly unaffected, and while undoubtedly there was some outrage at releasing an update simply to remove a feature, it didn't really affect people.

    The Xbox One changes games, which affects everyone. Every cartridge and disk based console without exception has allowed you to trade in and borrow games. The only restriction has been that you can't duplicate the games themselves, from the Atari 2600 to the NES to the PlayStation, this has been the only restriction.

    There is a reason why people are console gamers and not PC gamers.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  24. Reminds me of a FAQ from ~15 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q. Why did the chicken cross the road?

    A. Deregulation of the chicken's side of the road was threatening its dominant market position. The chicken was faced with significant challenges to create and develop the competencies required for the newly competitive market. Andersen Consulting, in a partnering relationship with the client, helped the chicken by rethinking its physical distribution strategy and implementation processes. Using the Poultry Integration Model (PIM), Andersen helped the chicken use its skills, methodologies, knowledge, capital and experiences to align the chicken's people, processes and technology in support of its overall strategy within a Program Management framework. Andersen Consulting convened a diverse cross-spectrum of road analysts and best chickens along with Anderson consultants with deep skills in the transportation industry to engage in a two-day itinerary of meetings in order to leverage their personal knowledge capital, both tacit and explicit, and to enable them to synergize with each other in order to achieve the implicit goals of delivering and unsuccessfully architecting and implementing an enterprise-wide value framework across the continuum of poultry cross-median processes.The meeting was held in a park-like setting, enabling and creating an impactful environment which was strategically based, industry focused, and built upon a consistent, clear, and unified market message and aligned with the chicken's mission, vision, and core values. This was conducive towards the creation of a total business.

  25. While we're on 1984 references... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this today's 5 minutes hate? I'd hate to have missed it if this isn't it.

  26. $400 too much by RubberDogBone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since I don't game much any more, mainly because I have nothing to prove to 14-year-olds who would mow me down, the only aspect of Xbone that remotely appealed to me was the promise to revolutionize TV.

    Luckily, TV and "sparts" were most of what they talked about! Oh joy. Just the same old TV repackaged. Wow this is totally what everyone wanted. Um.. yeah.

    The thing is, I already have several TV gadgets that do most of that, or at least the parts I care about. One is a Roku box. Microsoft should get one. It was $90 at Costco and ranks up there among the best decisions I've ever made in electronics. The thing OWNS my TV on the weekends. Key points: it was under $100 and I already have it. Two of them, actually. Roku in the kitchen over wifi is like wireless cable. Now what am I missing again?

    Another gadget is the new Dish Hopper with Sling. The box they tried to ban. Sure, I have to pay every month for it and it only gets "a whole lot of channels" mostly in HD, for not a lot of money. But it does a very good job at it the one thing it does. It also happily feeds ALL of that content to my phone, wherever I might happen to be. Or a PC or tablet or whatever.

    Wait, RDB. What about playing pirated video files? What about porn files!? Roku doesn't do that very well! Nope. But the Hopper can play some and I also have an old WDTV Live box which can play nearly anything. It plays some things VLC won't touch. The WD box doesn't do much else but it does do file playback. A perfect companion device. It, too, was cheap.

    So I am not feeling the need to drop $500 on another STB. What I have works. Nothing Microsoft demoed or talked about poses any threat at all to these devices. And even if they did, the price tag still kills it.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  27. Get an HD7790 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best bang for your buck currently out there, best performance per watt, and the only AMD chip currently out with OpenGL 4.3 support (The rest are capped at 4.2 or 4.1).

    Also they're 140 to 170 depending on if you want 1 gig or 2 gigs of ram, with an 80-90W TDP.

    Not quite as fast as an HD7850, esp in memory bandwidth, but at half the wattage...

  28. So what Batshit Evil Plan does MS have to force by Marrow · · Score: 1

    current 360 owners onto a new One? Aside from sick quality levels on 360, how are they planning on forcing people to upgrade? They just stop making 360s and hope for attrition? Or are they going to torment game developers into dropping 360 development and new games will only be for One.
    Anyone know what their master plan is? I am writing this based on an article that says One will not play 360 games.

    1. Re:So what Batshit Evil Plan does MS have to force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They deactivated Xbox Live for the original Xbox a few years back, which a lot of people cited as the superior online console gaming service, and I don't see why Microsoft wouldn't do the same with the 360 after some time.

    2. Re:So what Batshit Evil Plan does MS have to force by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      The stated plan is to continue to support the 360 for several years, they also just released the new model. I expect that the 360 will be produced and get games for another 4-5 years as there's somewhat less incentive to upgrade from this generation then from the last (regardless of whether you're going Sony or MS) and the PS2 lasted for years after the PS3 was released.

    3. Re:So what Batshit Evil Plan does MS have to force by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      They just stop making 360s and hope for attrition?

      Free hint: How are you enjoying Xbox Live on the original Xbox these days?

  29. Where's the Fallout 4 News? by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    Nothing about Fallout 4. Not news!~!

  30. Bring a controller by tepples · · Score: 1

    Realistically, if you want to play a game with someone who lives out of range of cable and DSL, you're going to have to visit them and bring a controller to play same-screen multiplayer. The latency of satellite or microwave won't cut it.

    1. Re:Bring a controller by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      Or, you could get a PC

    2. Re:Bring a controller by cybertears · · Score: 1

      You missed his point. It isn't about the platform, it's about the bandwidth. Even on PC, you are likely to have bandwidth issues when trying to play in a rural area.

    3. Re:Bring a controller by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Technically - microwave links have some of the lowest latency available. Much better than cable or DSL, on par with optical.

      Seriously. Financial traders are using them as alternative to optical when they cannot get a straight enough fiber line.

  31. the only FAQ that matters by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Is anyone going to buy the Xbox One?
    No.

    All the rest of the questions and answers seem pretty stupid after that since that sort of undermines them all.

    1. Re:the only FAQ that matters by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Lots of people. There's going to be a ton of people who switch to Sony, but there's going to be a lot of people who buy the XBone. while there's plenty of wailing and gnashing of teeth, there's also plenty of people who just don't care enough about the issues with the XBone to have it put them off.

    2. Re:the only FAQ that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your answer to the first question is wrong because I'm going to buy an Xbox One. (I know, I'm going to get shouted town by the Slashdot Trolls...)

  32. Steam style limits by symbolset · · Score: 1

    If you like Steam's limits you don't need an Xbox One to get you there. You'll be fine with any old Linux box, a Steambox, or Stean in WINE (I'm not a big fan of wine). Steambox is like XBox One without the monthlies.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  33. Dial-up still exists by tepples · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has become heavier over time, but it probably still works better on dial-up than Xbox One.

  34. Xbox One = NSA spy platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just in-case you really clueless idiots didn't get the memo, multiple leaks have conformed that Microsoft builds NSA exploits into every product it sells, and that most of the software updates that waste multiple millions of man-hours across the globe are needed when the exploits become too widely known, forcing MS to close the old holes and open new ones.

    As for the XBone- well here's the thing. EVERY developer of an app or game for this platform is instructed to use Kinect for input. This does not mean Kinect input for a major function, like the control of a character in a FPS (although MS would like evn in that situation for Kinect to be waiting for a gesture or voice command). No, it simply means EVERY app/game must give the user the impression that keeping the Kinect sensor 'calibrated' (ie., spying on the room) is alwyas, and I mean ALWAYS desirable.

    If Kinect is disabled at a hardware level, no app/game will rune on the console. If kinect is soft disabled, with tape over the lens, or by pointing it at the wall, the console will immediately begin pestering the user to re-calibrate (ie., allow the Kinect to 'see' the full room). No ordinary user will ever use the Xbox One unless the Kinect camera system has full view of everyone in the room.

    The Kinect sensor has its own OS, and its own hardware blocks, including exclusive use of RAM, exclusive use of a dedicated area of the HDD, and exclusive use of some of the CPU cores (of which there are 8 in total). No game- repeat NO GAME- can over-ride this allocation of hardware resources to Kinect. Kinect can function at full blast, processing the multiple sensors, compressing and encrypting video, and streaming this data to a remote server, without ANY performance impact on even the most hard-working AAA game.

    Kinect is ALWAYS monitoring who and when people enter and leave the room, and takes a facial photograph of each new person per day. The required once-per-24hr Internet connection always uploads this data.

    Beyond this default and unstoppable spying, online XBone consoles announce themselves to NSA servers. Any online console can be remotely instructed to begin immediate streaming of data from the Kinect sensor block. The data rate of the encrypted stream is entirely programmable, to cope with situations where too much upstream data would pose issues.

    Beyond this, any XBone can be given a list that can extend to many thousands of 'trigger' conditions. These triggers can use sound, image, infra-red and depth data from Kinect, and may include things like a gunshot, people talking in a given language, a particular person speaking in the room, or people having sex, for instance. When the 'trigger' condition occurs, the XBone can be made to engage in any form of immediate behaviour- streaming to a remote server or the HDD if no internet connection is current. Sending an alert to NSA personnel for further investigation/instruction. Snapshot collection of image and audio data.

    The XBone never engages complete sleep mode if it detects people in the room. The Xbone is constantly uploading and downloading encrypted data to 'groom' the user not to worry about XBone internet traffic.

    Everything you might imagine, in your worst nightmare, that a rogue administration working with Microsoft would require from a spy box in every citizen's home is exactly how the XBone operates. It sees you in the light and it sees you in the dark. It knows how you move. It knows what you say, and frequently, what you say in adjoining rooms as well thanks to the array of microphones. It can move a high quality stream of your room to any NSA server and you have no way to prevent this.

    Let me ask you this. How many politicians and other persons of interest do you think the Xbone will catch having sex with people they should not be having sex with? How useful will this information be to those engaged in ensuring such people give their 'support' to those that demand it? How many 'Mel Gibson' moments will the XBone record? How many Muslims will go to

  35. 56k modem by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before broadband there was a thing known as a modem which hooked up to a telephone line. I realise that you may not have heard of these existing, as they did, in that uninteresting bit of history between the late Cretaceous and yesterday. However posting on Slashdot is entirely possible through such a device. Some are still rumoured to exist out in the wilds, far beyond the sight of the last suburb, where the 3G reception icon on your phone starts to flicker.

    1. Re:56k modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The latency due to speed of light delay must be positively horrendous, but I suppose even the proto-humans on the very edge of our light sphere deserve the internet, too, so help you god.

    2. Re:56k modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before broadband there was a thing known as a modem which hooked up to a telephone line... However posting on Slashdot is entirely possible through such a device.

      In some rural areas: barely. This page alone, with the default comment score display settings and its referenced, is nearly 400KB in size. Depending on how rural you are it could take several minutes just to load this page alone.

      I don't know how much traffic the Xbox one will be generating during the once-per-day check-in, but given it's Microsoft I imagine it's a far sight worse than a measly 400KB. I would not want to be held at the mercy of a lousy, unreliable dial-up connection to keep my Xbox One operating every day. Hell, I wouldn't even want to go through the trouble of dialing in every day to make it possible.

  36. Microsoft said this, cretin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An official Microsoft spokesperson specifically stated XBone bans meant the user loses access to their own games. Another spokesperson later claimed the exact opposite. As far as users are concerned, Microsoft has said such bans are possible, and has ensured the user has no way (except the courts in the EU) to prevent this.

    Will Microsoft be dumb enough to ban single player games? Yes, in the US, where Obama has stated the EULA is law. No in the EU, where courts have stated the EULA is meaningless. Microsoft is NOT kidding. This time round they are insane, and intend to screw the user in every way possible.

    1. Re:Microsoft said this, cretin by recoiledsnake · · Score: 0

      If you can't see the difference between a level 1 rep, a director of programming and a spokesperson, no one can help you.

      --
      This space for rent.
  37. Customer==Enemy by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 0

    Why would you want to write off 10-20% of your potential market (and piss off 50%) before you even start competing with Sony?

    That seems to be Sony's marketing strategy, and it seems to work for them. Frankly, I expect that both of these new consoles will root everything on your home network.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  38. No current PC can match the PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS4 is fully HSA and Huma (go look up the acronyms), using an architecture AMD will not have in their desktop chips until the second half of 2014 at the earliest. Almost no-one here understands the long term significance of the PS4 design. Put simply, the PS4 can do things with memory that no current PC can even dream of. GDDR5 is only a small part of this picture.

    Next, the PS4 can handle incredible numbers of GPU threads without the overhead of a Microsoft driver model making such an approach pointless. This means that the GPU is unleashed in ways no PC can match until the next generation of AMD GPU parts (early 2013) at the earliest. You see, to compensate for the disaster of Windows driver model (which is worse than ever in Windows 8), AMD and Nvidia are putting CPU cores on the GPU to handle the thread processing, so thread processing is no longer dependent on Windows. This functionality, as I said, doesn't hit desktop parts until 2013 (and even then needs software support from developers, which will take years).

    Every PS4 is the same. Every PC is different. Games for the PS4 can take the hardware for granted. Games for the PC will assume (at least for the next 3 years) that most users have 2012 designs or earlier.

    I game exclusively on the PC, and do not own either an Xbox360 or PS3, but unlike the idiots proclaiming the superiority of the PC, have complete awareness of what the incredible architecture of the PS4 means. Sure, if you run a current generation game at an high-resolution on your Nvidia Titan stuffed PC, no PS4 can match that performance, but that matters not. Future games are going to involve features that play to the incredible new strengths of the PS4, and no current PC can match those advantages.

    The best PS4 games will have far more things happening at one time than is possible with current PC architecture. No amount of extra RAW power on the GPU side can compensate for this. It is all down to how many heavy different GPU threads you can have per game frame. On the PC, driver and state change issues ensure this number is incredibly low. On the PS4 these overheads are almost entirely missing.

    The design of the PC is due to undergo a massive change starting some time next year. Both AMD and Intel will be soldering the CPU and memory to the motherboard to boost performance. Both are going HSA and Huma, but AMD has a massive lead here. AMD fully intends to have PCs that are superior to the system AMD has designed for the PS4, but certainly not this year.

    The PS4 is so advanced, if the XBone flops and more game development focuses on the PS4, back-porting to the PC will become much more difficult, and many games companies won't bother. Unlike the PS4, the Xbone One is like a very basic gaming PC, and no game that runs on the Xbone would be difficult to port to the PC.

    We should be grateful to the PS4 for finally breaking the cycle of games being the same old engine, just with higher rez textures, higher rez output, and more frame rates. The PS4 will enable open world games that are vastly more realistic and pleasing, and one day not too far away the PC will start to catch up.

    1. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man where the hell did you get all that BS from. I am guessing some sort of Sony FANBOI forum as I can assure you it is bullshit. The PS4 and Xbox One are definitely pretty good hardware wise, but neither come close to what a Top end PC can currently achieve with top end multi core CPU's. GDDR5 is dedicated as 2,3,4GB on any highend graphics card as well and both OpenGL and DirectX are accually incredibly good (low overhead) in utilizing the threading capabilities of modern GPU architectures in both windows and Linux. perhaps before parroting such garbage from a fanboi forum you should go and do some reading.

    2. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      The Xbox and PS4 use the SAME CPU, the PS4 has a slightly stronger midrange GPU. Graphical performance between them will be very similar, so you appear to have some contradictions in your statements. Either they are both equivalent to entry level gaming PC's or they are both incredibly powerful architectures. The truth is actually somewhere in the middle, both sit somewhere around the midrange level gaming machines which should put them edging more towards lowend gaming machines by next year, nothing wrong with that for a console as you can push a console much harder due to dedicated fixed hardware architecture that makes it easier for developers to push more out of the hardware, but you are living in a lala land if you believe the PS4 is some amazing new architecture.

    3. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The integrated nature of the PS4's unified memory helps a little to make up for what it lacks in raw horsepower but it still is a long way off what single card high end gaming rigs can achieve, let alone multi card rigs. modern GPU's and Bus memory bandwidth mean that while it takes more work to feed the GPU it still can be fed much much faster than what a PS4 could ever hope to achieve, PS4 shared memory helps it a little to compensate for its lack of memory bandwidth and lackluster overall GPU performance though it will never approach what high end GPU's of even a year or so ago can achieve on current hardware. As for open world environments, welcome to the turn of the century, i.e. something PC gamers have been experiencing for over a decade now.

    4. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Put simply, the PS4 can do things with memory that no current PC can even dream of

      I heard similar things about the PS3, but then I found it couldn't run games at 1080p without being capped at 30fps, later I found games like Resident Evil would often go down to 5fps etc. while the PC version did not.

      I don't really care for more lies.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      You're quite correct - the OP is sprouting BS, HOWEVER the XBones visualized OS architecture does sound like it will add additional limits and reduce the raw power available to games; while that is probably something like 5-10% when gaming sites are doing frame by frame comparisons on the current gen, I don't see the XBone as coming out ahead on this, especially when developers become familiar with both (XBone & PS4) architectures.

    6. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      We should be grateful to the PS4 for finally breaking the cycle of games being the same old engine, just with higher rez textures, higher rez output, and more frame rates. The PS4 will enable open world games that are vastly more realistic and pleasing, and one day not too far away the PC will start to catch up.

      They broke the cycle with the PS3 and the Cell architecture. The PS4 is going backwards "the PlayStation 4 will feature an AMD processor based
      around the x86-64 instruction set"

      "Other notable hardware features ... dedicated custom chips for processing audio, video and background tasks."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_4

      Sound familiar? It's what the Amiga did, even had names for the chips
      Denise (video) Paula (audio) Copper and Agnus ran the show
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga_custom_chips

      I'd buy a PS4 before an XBone, but all I use my PS3 for is Netflix.

      ----
      I LOL http://www.acronymfinder.com/HUMA.html

    7. Re:No current PC can match the PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was not suggesting the Xbox would come out ahead, I would expect it to be comfortably behind the PS4 and be playing in very similar areas of the market performance wise within 5-15%. Both on the other hand will be a long long way behind highend PC's

  39. F MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a big console gamer these days and the only reason I do pick up any games is because I can buy them used.

    PC gaming will be the end of console gaming and really it should have happened already. It's already cheap to build a system that can run high quality games at far better speeds than PS3/Xbox and the new gen cards are already cheap enough that you could upgrade for the cost of a PS4 or Xbox One.. Console gaming was fine in the 80's and 90's but right now technology is simply progressing far too fast for them to keep up. Console gaming systems are meant to have a very long lifespan of around 10 years.

    When the technology was just hitting big in PC gaming it was still fine because it was costly and not as good as the consoles on the market at the time. That is not the case today and if people wanna blow their money on a dying method of gaming I say have fun lol. I mean shit I have a PC hooked to every TV in my home and my main PC is hooked with a wireless connection to every TV. I don't need a console, a dvd player, a cable tv box, or whatever.

  40. Projection systems by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Quite aside from the other purchase stoppers, I have a projection system, and the Kinect simply doesn't work in that environment -- I know this -- we tried it. It's blinded by the projector just to start, and when you stand where it can see your outline blocking the projector, you're an annoying shadow on the display anyway. Complete non-starter. We threw our Kinect in a box and never took it out again.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  41. managed code once you pay 100 bucks. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    yeah.. you can run your indie code once you pay the developer fee.. same deal as current. or you can write javascript for the browser.

    just buy a pc and you'll be happier.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. Microsoft is widely misunderstood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People think Microsoft is a software and hardware company. Yes, it does that, but that's not Microsoft's primary purpose. Microsoft is an evil company that merely uses software and hardware to deliver evil.

  43. Metacomment on Microsoft's reputation by real-modo · · Score: 2

    Someone dumped some stuff in a pastebin, and somehow we all *know* it's an internal Microsoft guide for "Reputation Managers".

    Why do we *know* this? (Hear me out - I'm not attempting to deny it. I'm making a larger point.)

    Perhaps it's because of Microsoft's reputation.

    What is that reputation? Contempt.

    Microsoft has contempt for the people who are forced to use its products. This is why people react so strongly to Microsoft's recent innovations: it's not the change, but the contempt, that they are reacting to.

    Microsoft wasn't always this way, but the attitude was certainly well entrenched by the time that it introduced its Office certification, the "MOUS".[1] The contempt came through with its introduction of the Office Ribbon, immediately after Microsoft said it'd be "too hard" for users to learn the "very different" user interface of OpenOffice. It came through with the total lack of investment in IE. It came through with the introduction of Vista. It came through with WinCE, and the Kin, and with the trashing of Windows Phone 7 users' investment: can't take your apps to 8, suckers! Most strongly, it has come through in the introduction of Windows 8.

    The contempt was multi-leveled with 8. An interface designed for touch...and nearly no computers to use it on, nor any in the offing at the time of launch. That was subtle contempt. But the really big, fat, obvious, in-your-face contempt was in the look and feel of the UI. Big blocks of flat primary colors, vocabulary like "charms", dumping you suddenly back at the start page every time Microsoft thinks you're doing something too complicated: this was a UI for pre-schoolers or early primary-school kids. On tranquilizers.[2]

    Why did Microsoft think that 8's UI would be acceptable to adults? Because Microsoft has complete contempt for its users. Microsoft has been dissing its users for a long time now. And with "x-bone phone home", always-on cam, etc., the dissing continues: you're a child. You can't handle privacy: you'll just do naughty things with it.

    *This* is why we believe some anonymous pastebin: we know, inside, that Microsoft has contempt for its users. We've got the message.

    The XBox One was conceived in a culture of contempt, and soaked in it throughout its gestation. If gamers have any self-respect, it will die still-born.

    --tl;dr-stop-here--

    1. Rebranded the MOS. Would you rather be a mouse, or moss? Which is more respectful?

    2. This is what gets people's backs up about the '8 UI. "Can't handle change" never passed the sniff test: tens of millions could handle running away to iOS, Android, OS X... and some can even work with Chrome, according to Amazon's best-seller lists. I've yet to read their complaints about the inefficiency of those UIs.

    People (even slashdotters) aren't good at introspection, though, so the unconscious reaction to Microsoft's contempt as embodied in the 8UI came out as a dislike of the mechanics of the UI, rather than as "Microsoft is insulting me! The bastards!"

    1. Re:Metacomment on Microsoft's reputation by jimbrooking · · Score: 1

      MS Contempt© has been an integral part of MS product development long before the Office Ribbon. Favorite Bill Gates quote from an interview back in the late 1990s: "I can't think of a worse reason than fixing bugs to release new version of software." I remember seeing that in ComputerWorld circa 1996 but sadly can't lay my hands on the original article. This, though, captures the sense, and indeed may actually be the interview from which ComputerWorld extracted and paraphrased the quote.

      And did you ever try to open a "NEW. IMPROVED" MS Office product's files with your same old, unimproved MS Office Product? Contempt© or just good marketing? Or is there a difference?

    2. Re:Metacomment on Microsoft's reputation by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      You most certainly can use apps you purchased on WP7 on a WP8 phone. The only limitation is that the app developer has to certify that it works on 8.

  44. More realistically... by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Xbone will do ok in the US. That's its home market, there's always a degree of "patriotic" buying (though not to the same extent as in Japan) and, like them or not, some of the 360's exclusive franchises still have a lot of market power. There are people who will buy an Xbone for Halo. The overlap between those people and "people who read slashdot" is probably quite small.

    Will the Xbone do as well in the US as the 360 has (where the sales data shows it's the dominant console)? Probably not, at least on the basis of what we've seen so far. Sony's given the "floating voters" with no strong attachment to either camp a lot of reasons to go in the PS4 direction this time. But the Xbox series has a lot of loyal fans in the US and most of them will still be hanging on.

    The danger for MS lies outside of the US. Ok, it's never managed to get the Xbox to succeed in Japan. So it's probably fair that it doesn't put too many resources into trying this time around (you'll never get away from the fact that the demographic profile of gamers looks very, very different in Japan and is much less interested in those games we consider "mainstream" in the West).

    But Europe? Europe was in many ways the key swing battleground of the 360/PS3 generation and didn't really commit strongly to either camp. There's no "domestic" console, so no "patriotic buying" effect; in short, there's everything to play for. But MS seem to have decided not to play.

    The TV offerings (which won't even be available in many territories to start with) aren't exactly tempting in Europe. I've had to sort out phone/tv/broadband packages in the UK, Belgium and the US in the last couple of years and can hand-on-heart say that you can get a decent TV package much more cheaply and easily in Europe these days. Sky or Virgin Media vs Comcast? It's not even close. MS is facing much tougher competition to take over from the existing TV providers.

    The competition in Europe is, therefore, much more likely to be about being the better machine for games. Sony's messaging so far has been "games, games, games". I'm not really sure that Halo has more potency as a brand than Resistance, or that Gears of War is more potent than Killzone in Europe.

    Then there are the emerging markets. The parts of the world that don't buy many consoles right now, but which might conceivably start to buy a lot more over the course of the next few years. These are also places where the 24-hour-dial-home restriction is likely to be a serious deterrent.

    If MS doesn't do some urgent damage limitation, the Xbone runs a serious risk of ending up as a single-territory console.

    1. Re:More realistically... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many gamers are kids. They have limited income, there is only so much MS and publishers can bleed them. They buy a lot of second hand games and always trade in the ones they finish. Those kids will be buying a PS4.

      Some people will just put up with it and shell out the cash. Some people don't have that choice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:More realistically... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The danger for MS lies outside of the US. Ok, it's never managed to get the Xbox to succeed in Japan.

      The Japanese already live in a complete surveillance state and have decent internet access, so I predict that these changes will not hurt them at all there, ironically.

      If MS doesn't do some urgent damage limitation, the Xbone runs a serious risk of ending up as a single-territory console.

      It might in fact do so poorly here in the USA that they have to change their strategy. I wonder if their agreement with publishers permits it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:More realistically... by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      If MS doesn't do some urgent damage limitation, the Xbone runs a serious risk of ending up as a single-territory console.

      What people aren't getting is that for MS, that's fine. Their business strategy is to ream every penny they can via micro-transactions, impulse buys, and advertising. That works best in America. Selling compatible games at Walmart is obviously NOT the priority of this console.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    4. Re:More realistically... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to suspect that MS agrees with you - and that it is prepared to bet this particular farm on a US-only strategy. Certainly, it couldn't possibly do more than it is doing right now to alienate Europe and Asia. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the things it's planning for its European launch resulted in the Powers That Be in the EU taking an unfriendly interest (in terms of trade barriers). There are probably get-arounds on that and MS might avoid official sanction, but it's still proving terrible in reputation terms. The whole Witcher 3/Poland issue has got more media coverage than you might expect in Europe.

      The question is whether, in a world of escalating development costs, a single-territory strategy is ever going to be viable (even when that territory is the US). Those Japanese developers who have gone for a domestic-first route over the last generation have sacrificed much of their ability to get back into the international arena. A US-only XBone would probably become a gaming backwater in fairly short order, in a world where it was competing with an international PS4. And if it's a gaming backwater... will it ever sell well enough to realise MS's other aspirations for it?

  45. Cloud-to-Butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran this through the Cloud-to-Butt extension for Chrome. This version seems to make more sense.

    http://pastebin.com/6YkLnA8z

  46. It's their right to disconnect the servers anytime by master_p · · Score: 1

    It's their right to disconnect the servers any time they want. They sell you the product without hiding that fact. If you don't want the product, you don't buy it.

    Crying 'consumer rights' for a product that is sold with a publicly known 'always on' feature is like wanting to enforce your own policy on the publisher.

    Guess what? it will not happen. Just don't buy those games.

  47. Re:It's their right to disconnect the servers anyt by coId+fjord · · Score: 1

    If you don't want the product, you don't buy it.

    I'm sure no one figured out that people have the ability to do that. Quite insightful.

    Crying 'consumer rights' for a product that is sold with a publicly known 'always on' feature is like wanting to enforce your own policy on the publisher.

    Well, there are European countries which protect consumer rights to a greater extent than other countries, but whether they'd do anything about this is another matter. So, complaining 'consumer rights' might not be off-base if people can get someone to take action.

    --
    Check UIDs. I'm COLD FJORD(826450). User COID FJORD(2949869) has impersonated me. Don't confuse us if he trolls you.
  48. doubtful by aepervius · · Score: 1

    At least in germany valve would get a beating unless they would add a patch to remove the DRM shortly before shutting down the server. First sale and stuff.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:doubtful by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At least in germany valve would get a beating unless they would add a patch to remove the DRM shortly before shutting down the server. First sale and stuff.

      Corporations do not simply cease to exist, someone else owns them. Take it up with the new owner. They won't be allowed to release any such patches if they are filing for bankruptcy as it would reduce the value of their assets.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:doubtful by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a company in Washington, United States cares what Germany says.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  49. Lose Internet but not power? Buy day of tethering by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unless you paid for a tethering plan for your phone, they are all just as subject to your internet going out

    I've read other comments implying that for those few Internet outages that aren't also power outages, geeks are more likely to buy one-day prepaid tethering plans to make up for temporary losses of Internet access.

  50. Offline multiplayer by tepples · · Score: 1

    PS4 also requires a paid monthly subscription to play multiplayer games.

    I haven't read any news that console makers had planned to charge extra for offline multiplayer. Would a PS4 or Xbox One owner be charged per month just to pair more than one wireless controller to the console? Oh, I get it: the only multiplayer you know is online.

  51. Re:It's their right to disconnect the servers anyt by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It won't happen in the US. It might happen in the EU. Or, haven't you been paying attention? The EU apparently does not share the USA's belief that corporations are our lords and masters in all things.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really care about the always connected, my Xbox 360 is always connected anyway. I don't care about the used game policy, I don't trade my games or buy used ones. I don't care about the always on connect, I can cover both the microphone and the camera. My biggest concern is that when Microsoft no longer supports the Xbox One, I can no longer play the games I've purchased for it, digital or disc based. Every console I own can still play every game I've purchased for it even tho they are past their support period.

  53. Console VS PC by phorm · · Score: 1

    Well, it used to be that when you bought a console VS gaming PC, you didn't have to worry about some things like compatability issues, drivers, viruses/spyware, etc.

    Now we've got console games that essentially need 0-day patches to fix poorly-tested games, need to download software updates for licensing (playing BD discs, etc), need software updates to stay online and play with friends, need an internet connection just to play single player, and come with the spyware BUILT IN.

    Congratulations vendors, you've taken away anything that make it worth having a console.

    1. Re:Console VS PC by JDeane · · Score: 1

      That and consoles used to cost about 200 bucks at launch, sometimes a little more, and PC's used to cost 3,000 for a decent gaming PC (yeah you can still spend 3K on a machine but those are insane machines...) Meanwhile these days launch consoles have jumped in price and PC's have fallen to the point where there almost is no difference in price.

      If not for exclusive games consoles would be all but a waste of time, and that's getting harder and harder to justify not saying "Ahhh hell with this I will just build a HTPC throw MAME and every other emulator on it and buy a wireless gamepad."

  54. #FuckOffWithIt (n/t) by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    has a nice right to it

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  55. Discretionary income by tepples · · Score: 1

    According to the 2010 census, 17.7% of the population of the U.S. is rural.

    I would imagine that video game console makers prefer customers with more discretionary income to buy more disc games and more download games. How much discretionary income do these rural dwellers have compared to urban dwellers?

    1. Re:Discretionary income by greythax · · Score: 1

      I imagine as much or more than the urban poor, seeing as how they have to have a car and quite a bit of gas money to live where they do. And, before you dismiss the urban poor in the game market, allow me to post my anecdotal evidence: My friend, who is the manager for a local gamestop, told me that 80% of her business is poor people, and she posted in the top 20 for preorder percentage in the company last quarter. It is a pretty significant market to be throwing away.

    2. Re:Discretionary income by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, Microsoft (or the game dev/publisher) don't get a cut from all that sales your gamestop manager friend gets.

      That urban poor may have gone through a dozen used games a year, but to Microsoft, their expendable income is only the $60 from the first guy who bought the game new.

      From a different angle, I also think that the rural folks may not be as affluent or loose with their money as you think.

      They may have the income to own a car, but having a car also means you have to pay the costs of maintaining that car. Maybe they're left with less disposable income after paying the associated costs of the car.

      Furthermore, seeing as they cannot just drop by the nearest Gamestop to pick up/trade games, the rural folks may only buy a few games with longevity instead of a dozen shorter and less replayable games over the same period of time.

    3. Re:Discretionary income by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      About even. Not every urban dweller is living the dream. For every Bel Air, you have an Oakland. For every ueber expensive neighborhood in northern Virginia, you have Detroit, Flint, Camden, St Louis or Baltimore. It really just is more people shoved into a smaller space.

      Lower average pay often (not always) balances against lower cost of living.

  56. Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people posting here weren't at E3. I was, and I'm here to tell you that the XBOne is by far the best of the next-gen console as it stands now. The games do look next-gen, are well-thought out, and impressive. PS4 was a snoozer, and Wii-U is DOA. So the system phones home once a day? If you were without internet for 3 minutes your face would explode like the Nazi at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark anyways. Used games are an issue, but that's going to be figured out down the line.

    And no, I'm not a fanboy - I own all three current gen platforms. XB blows the others out of the water for now. I've played with it, and it's really sweet. ($499 pricetag is another matter, however).

    1. Re:Ignorance by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Most people posting here weren't at E3. I was, and I'm here to tell you that the XBOne is by far the best of the next-gen console as it stands now. The games do look next-gen, are well-thought out, and impressive.

      No wonder, considering that the demos you saw at the show were run on a massively beefed up Windows 7 PC with a GTX 770 graphics card. What you're going to get on the real hardware will be nowhere near as impressive, since the real Xbone's GPU will have shader performance roughly equivalent to a Radeon HD 7790, but with much worse memory bandwidth due to using DDR3 instead of GDDR5.

  57. "Natural Identity" by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Q: How will avatars work in Xbox One and will my avatar items carry over?
    A: Xbox One leverages your natural identity while continuing to have avatars as an important part of your identity. We’ll share more in the coming months.

    You heard it here first: It's now mandatory to have your real name on your XBOX live profile. Now all those 13 year olds can come to your house and actually fuck your mom!

  58. Re:Lose Internet but not power? Buy day of tetheri by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

    Not a lot of people would go as far as to get a tethering plan for internet outages; they can do other things when the internet is down, like do errands or play games. That's only part of the problem; the other problem is "despite us saying it would never happen, connection to XBone servers isn't working due to a technical error, high volume, or our system thinking you're a pirate with 90% confidence. Since you just turned your Xbone on and haven't played it for 24 hours, have fun not playing! But don't worry, this doesn't happen all that often." Sure, most people can live with it, but why get used to something that there is no need to get used to? I could get used to having to charge my phone every 30 minutes, but I wouldn't buy such a phone.

  59. Add PRISM connection by rsborg · · Score: 1

    The big problem problem that new consoles are fighting for is: a reason to exist. Most games demo-ed so far look possible on the current generation of hardware. Crowd sources AI is an interesting twist, but possible on current consoles. Killer Instinct is an odd thing to revive, but it would play just as well on a PS3.

    Suddenly Microsoft comes out with a console that:
    1. Phones home every day.
    2. Bans game lending.
    3. Possibly cripples the used game market, or maybe not, nobody is really sure.
    4. Requires Kinect to be always on, because that wasn't a disaapointment.

    Their sales pitch of "You can play games that are basically last-gen games, but with fewer rights" has had shocking trouble resonating with consumers.

    5. Integrates with PRISM natively, giving Big Gov (which is quite corrupt these days) a chance to look right into your living room.
    6. ???
    7. Profit at the expense of your privacy.

    Microsoft was the first big tech company to roll over for the NSA (that there's pretty good knowledge of NSA backdoors into Windows for years just shows their further corrupt nature). They give NSA exploit information prior to patching it.

    There is no way I am going to give Microsoft (and the government by proxy) a device that can tell when I entered a room, when I leave, and what I'm holding for f*cks sake. Just for some games?

    To those who think that Ouya and XBone/PS4 aren't comparable - I'll tell you something - when several of the options is anathema, the remainder, no matter how poor, are all I'm willing to commit to - that it costs so much less is a bonus. I still haven't figured out the Wii U, and I'm not sure I have time to.

    Fun should be simple - I debug/analyze and get systems working at my day job - I don't need to mess with all that @ home.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  60. Epic Cluster Fuck by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Pretty much defines how Microsoft is operating these days.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  61. Every major console since NES is "locked out" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Even the Wii provides a better experience in that regard, both for local multiplayer [...] But in general, why would you want to buy a locked out system

    The Wii, the Wii U, and in fact every Nintendo console since the Nintendo Entertainment System has been "a locked out system". The lockout chip, combined with a developer approval policy that has exploited the correlation between experience and quality, has resulted in a measure of quality control on Nintendo's platforms. This quality control is arguably the only way the NES was able to pull the North American video game market out of the shovelware rut it was in from 1983 through 1985. As for why one would buy a console over a living room gaming PC in the first place, that's because major PC game developers have tended to pay little attention to local multiplayer, and major developers of local multiplayer games have tended to pay little attention to the PC platform.

  62. You have to agree to Steam to agree to the game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't buy steam, I bought the game. Yet if it is a Steam game, I have to agree to a third party and install something I did not want, do not want and will only manage to refuse to let me play the game, IN ADDITION TO any bullshit problems the game itself has.

    And I'm meant to be HAPPY at that????

    The original HL still runs under Win98. Steam won't. Which means if you run your HL Steam game, you cannot run it on your old Win box. Why? The game works under it, and the original version of steam did. But now your gaming PC kept back so you can play other retro games will not play it because steam requires you update to the newest version and the newest version will not run on that machine.

    And you can't even reinstall it.

    Valve can refuse my access to Steam because, for example, I have more than one account with Steam. And without Steam, I cannot run the game. Even though the game doesn't require I do not have multiple accounts *even for that game*.

    This is why having to run Steam to play a game is wrong.

    Not because it is using up resources (though when it wants an update, it does that IN SPADES, so this IS a problem) but because it can only ever get in the way of what I paid and have a valid right to do.

  63. Yes it does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's you who does not know what "offline mode" is.

    You have to know you need to go offline.

    You have to go back online for some other game, you are now no longer offline. Big whoop. Note you cannot demand a refund if a game you buy doesn't have an offline mode or is heavily nerfed by being run in offline mode.

    Steam itself requires an internet connection.

    You cannot install a game without going online because essential bits are only transferred and unlocked in online mode.

    Steam still requires regular updates to itself and, if it thereby decides that your game in offline mode needs updates, it will REFUSE to allow your game to start in offline mode.

  64. Microwave is for the last mile by tepples · · Score: 1

    Technically - microwave links have some of the lowest latency available.

    A point-to-point microwave link gives the subscriber a low-latency connection to the cell tower at the other end of that link, but the other player is still on the other side of the Internet from the tower. You'd end up just as many hops away from the other player as you'd be with cable or DSL.

    1. Re:Microwave is for the last mile by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Sure, but don't forget that for residental connections there is quite large fixed component of latency in the last mile. IIRC circa 20ms for cable, 5-6ms for DSL and 2-3ms for radio (commercial uplink models, not modded wifi routers).

  65. Xbox One & Smartphone Venn Diagram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth: http://cheezburger.com/7584280576

  66. cheapt jordan shoes,Air max shoes,wallet sale by lakkago · · Score: 0

    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT! The website cheap wholesale and retail for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan, also including the handbags,sunglasses,jeans,shirts,hat,belt and the watch, All the products are free shipping, and the price is competitive, after the payment, can ship within short time. the goods are shipping by air express, such as EMS,DHL,the shipping time is in 5-7 business days! http://www.sport3trade.net/ cheap jordan for $40, Air Max 90 for $41, air shox for $40, best handbags for $39, Sunglasses for $18, wallet for $19, belt for $18, T-shirts for $20, Jeans for $39, NFL/MLB/NBA jersey for $25, Top Rolex watch,jordan for cheap, http://www.sport3trade.net/

  67. One Word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek Online!

    Uh, ok. So it's three words on paper, but it's only one in my head.

    Resistance is Futile!

  68. Would you buy a computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that was top of the line if you didn't have Internet connection? That's what Microsoft is thinking. Why bother if you don't have good Internet, you can't use it to its full capacity. It doesnt make sense to want one without Internet.