Slashdot Mirror


New Drug Mimics the Beneficial Effects of Exercise

Zothecula writes "A drug known as SR9009, which is currently under development at The Scripps Research Institute, increases the level of metabolic activity in skeletal muscles of mice. Treated mice become lean, develop larger muscles and can run much longer distances simply by taking SR9009, which mimics the effects of aerobic exercise. If similar effects can be obtained in people, the reversal of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and perhaps Type-II diabetes might be the very welcome result."

492 comments

  1. The alternative by Major+Ralph · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or you know, people could just go outside for a walk.

    --
    I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
    1. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How well has that worked so far?

    2. Re:The alternative by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easier said than done.

    3. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Great idea for those of us that can't walk (7 year survivor of bone marrow cancer, taking 3 kinds of pain meds just to be able to walk the minimum distances required for work and living)...

      Biking and swimming (only in heated pools) are my only kinds of exercise that I can do on a regular basis.

    4. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or you know, people could just go outside for a walk.

      I'd rather do a few hours of overtime every week ... so I can afford to buy pills and avoid all that WORK.

    5. Re:The alternative by roninmagus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ain't nobody got time for that. I say bring on the pills.

    6. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about those who can't? Muscle wasting is a major problem that complicates a variety of injuries and conditions, this could be a breakthrough for many people just wanting to live with more mobility and less pain.

      But then I guess that doesn't occur to the blinkered "fuck you" generation.

    7. Re:The alternative by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 0

      How well has that worked so far?

      Well, just take some BZ with it, and you'll not have to worry about it...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    8. Re:The alternative by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about if I just change my facebook profile picture?

    9. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... I'll take that instead!

    10. Re:The alternative by 0racle · · Score: 1

      And for those that can't? Or those that want to get healthy and can't exercise enough yet?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    11. Re:The alternative by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:The alternative by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Note to people in the future reading this, with healthy sexy bodies in spite of eating 25,000 calories a day of bleu cheese wrapped in burger wrapped in breadding, deep fried and dipped in cream cheese sauce: this is what we have to put up with.

      Memes as offboard quasi-DNA guiding behavior, guiding social pecking orders and reproduction (of DNA and memes). "Fucking fatass" is more about raising the speaker in his mind's eye as to social status vis-a-vis the ladies, by putting down as defective behaviours you in the future are no longer are concerned with. Similar to "fucking heathen" might be to us.

      Most people don't realize their brain is little more than the meme equivalent of the cellular chemicals doing DNA's bidding. How lucky you are, not having to deal with this, and only your ant overlords.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:The alternative by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Now, to just stay alive 5-10 more years and we're set.

      Which we've been saying since the 1950s at least.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't talk to your mother that way!

    15. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ain't nobody got time for that. I say bring on the pills.

      And Big Pharma ain't got time for nobody being healthy either, so don't think for a second these pills are actually good for you. Where one revenue stream stops another one is engineered to start.

    16. Re:The alternative by gagol · · Score: 1

      Or stay away from HFCS... but the trend is to consume more, not consume smart.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    17. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, have you told the Scripps Research Institute your findings? They'll be shocked at how quickly you found a universal solution to everyone's problem!

    18. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should you? Do you also wear a hairshirt?

      Sorry, but if technology makes some painful aspect of human existence obsolete (like exercising 30 minutes each day), then we should go with the technology if the effects aren't too negative. Luddism was a failed philosophy two centuries ago.

    19. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone can.

      I've been active all my life, out of necessity. If I don't get enough (5-6 hours/wk) high intensity endurance exercise, my brain doesn't work right (can't think straight, memory is impaired, etc), and I don't sleep well. I'm not sure why; one doctor suggested it might be related to an inborn error of metabolism. At the moment, I'm recovering from a partial meniscus tear; as I get older, the wear and tear on my body makes it harder to get the exercise I need. If there's a pill that can keep me going when I'm recovering, or once my body gives out, you'd better believe I'll take it. It's either that, or switch careers to something that's not intellectually demanding.

      Oh and "a walk" doesn't cut it, btw.

      Even for normal people, aerobic exercise has tremendous impact on mood. I don't know what the side effects of this drug will be, but if it's better than the current crop of antidepressants it could be a boon for those with mild to moderate depression who are too lazy to get out and do the eexercise.

    20. Re:The alternative by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I was trying to picture biking in a heated pool, and gave up . . . Seriously though, it would seem that people with mobility problems would be the most helped.

    21. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Big Pharma ain't got time for nobody being healthy neither

      FTFY

    22. Re:The alternative by skids · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not being a "Fat Ass" myself, I personally think everyone who goes around verbally abusing obese people is a pindick.

      But then, not being a puny pindick myself, I actually make friends, some of which are in fact obese, so I can see how a stupid pindick would be limited by their own assinine personality and never get the same perspective I have had,

    23. Re:The alternative by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Assuming the pill isn't an enormous suppository, it's not really mutually exclusive with walking. You could take the drug and also walk to make sure you were healthy.

    24. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, you know. Some people can't walk. Those lazy bastards. Giving themselves spinal cord injuries or chronic pain or birth defects just to avoid exercise.

    25. Re:The alternative by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there are stationary bikes for "spinning" in pools. They use paddles on the wheels for resistance while giving the added benefit of being in a heated pool.

      While nothing is better than the benefits of actual exercise, a pill such as this would make a big difference, as you noted, with people with mobility problems.

      I, personally, have Type 2 diabetes and love to cycle (not "spin"). I also have achilles tendonitis in BOTH ankles that flares up all the time resulting in excruciating pain. It would be nice to get some of the benefits of exercise on those days when it's just difficult to walk. If it could help get my A1C down, that alone would be exciting. Another benefit of lower A1C???? Better circulation and less inflammation - benefits all around. Bring it on!!!

    26. Re:The alternative by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      No need to imagine it, just youtube it! ;)
      http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=underwater+bicycle

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    27. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Why? Why would you willingly work harder than you have to? Only insane people do that.

    28. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes easy to say, impossible to do. There are people so morbidly obese they can no longer walk. Others are in wheelchairs because of amputations or other injuries or illnesses. This is for folks who CAN'T go outside for a walk, and in fact I'd bet that coupling this drug with exercise makes it work even better.

      I'll also bet that professional sports will ban it.

    29. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making desperate claims about having friends to mentally comfort yourself? Very cute. You're just as pathetic as the "fuck you" AC, only in different ways. Is that something all you pindicks do, or just you?

    30. Re: The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HBA1C? At least that's what we call it in the UK.. Having said that I'm type 1 so your tests may vary.

    31. Re: The alternative by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2

      HBA1C? At least that's what we call it in the UK..

      Yes - "A1C" and "HBA1C" are both short for "Hemoglobin A1c".

    32. Re:The alternative by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Or do both.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    33. Re:The alternative by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      And Big Pharma ain't got time for nobody being healthy either, so don't think for a second these pills are actually good for you.

      Sure they do. One of the side effects is high blood pressure, but there's a pill for that. Another side effect is blindness, there's also a pill for that type of blindness. Of course that blindness medication also causes hearing loss and pain. But that's alright as there are medications for both of those too. One of those lowers immunity to certain types of bacteria though. So you may need antibiotics on occasion....

      Where one revenue stream stops another one is engineered to start.

      Exactly

    34. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      It works pretty well for me, you should try it.

      Or if you live in a hell hole buy a treadmill.

    35. Re:The alternative by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      Boy, that escalated quickly.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    36. Re:The alternative by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Dude, but now I can sit in my mom's basement all day playing WoW and eating hot pockets, and have a body like a long distance runner, what's not love?

    37. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Taking a walk wasn't a perfect solution that works in 100% of cases, it's more a 80% solution. People who can't walk may have to look for another solution.

      People in wheelchairs can still get exercise as long as they have manual chairs not those human-weakening electronic things.

    38. Re:The alternative by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      I was trying to picture biking in a heated pool, and gave up . . .

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n4c3Bum9R8 there ya go.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    39. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Walking is a 80% solution that doesn't apply to everyone. Substitute walking with whatever works for you, just do something.

      There is nothing wrong with biking or swimming instead, or using a powerball, or free weights, or whatever.

    40. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To acclimate yourself to effort so that moderately difficult things begin to seem trivial. Motivation, gumption, spoons, whatever you want to call it, is not a fixed quantity. You can increase it by pushing yourself harder than required, in much the same way you can increase your courage by doing things you're afraid of.

      It's not insane, it only appears that way if you take a short-sighted view.

    41. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      You are working yourself to death. Do something different once in a while before you go crazy and kill everyone at your workplace.

    42. Re:The alternative by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      I could be reading this wrong, but it looks like life expectancy is trending upwards since the 50's. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005148.html

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    43. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea for those of us that can't walk (7 year survivor of bone marrow cancer, taking 3 kinds of pain meds just to be able to walk the minimum distances required for work and living)...

      Biking and swimming (only in heated pools) are my only kinds of exercise that I can do on a regular basis.

      So sorry to hear about your pain. I have a similar issue limiting my physical abilities. Endochrine based. This news is a little ray of hope. Let's hope it pans out with little side effects.

    44. Re:The alternative by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      I tried that once, but there was this freakish big thing floating above me. It was like a large light bulb. Looked like it was about to fall on me, so I ran back inside and hid under my bed for a week. I'm sure it's still out there, so I'm going to stay in her where I'm safee. You can't be too careful about those kind of things.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    45. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      And for those that can't? Or those that want to get healthy and can't exercise enough yet?

      This isn't meant to sound cruel but I've personally never met anyone that was so unfit they could not exercise or change their diet in some way that would help.

    46. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      High fructose corn syrup has likely killed more Americans than war. That stuff should be treated like poison.

      Surely a better use can be found for it. Ferment it into alcohol and run cars off it or whatever.

    47. Re: The alternative by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Actually, at least at the hospital where I work (and, presumably, through the rest of the military health system, since it's a standard test), it's HgA1c; 'HbA1c' must be a variant usage.

    48. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Exercising should not be painful as such. If you do it right it should give you a bit of a buzz, it should make you feel good.

      No pain no gain doesn't mean the more pain you feel the more you gain.

    49. Re:The alternative by lxs · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Fucking fatass" is meant as an incentive to stop making excuses and become fit and healthy. The speaker really wants you to succeed in living a long, slim and successful life you fucking fatass.

    50. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Why? Why would you willingly work harder than you have to? Only insane people do that.

      There is no such thing as sanity, it's just the most common form of insanity. Some people find doing things rewarding.

    51. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Life is hard enough without introducing artificial difficulties. If people want to challenge themselves just for the heck of it, they can play video games at max difficulty levels. Or willingly inflict pain on themselves.

    52. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooosh

    53. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      But here I can get the gain without the pain. Also, I'm a lazy guy. I don't need to exercise since I never get fat anyway. But I'll sure take me some pills, no problem!

    54. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine just died a few months ago from MD. He was 22, and had been in a wheelchair since he was 12, and almost completely bedridden from 20. At initial diagnosis (when he was about 6), his doctors predicted he would live to about 16. He was on steroids for many years, and they probably prolonged his life by quite a bit.

      His downward spiral was caused by a heart attack, which the EMT's brought him through with a defibrillator. At the hospital, he was put into the ICU, and kept in a medically-induced coma for several days, on a ventilator, with tubes and wires everywhere. Yes, everywhere. I saw the bag. After 10 days in the hospital, and after numerous attempts to wean him off of the ventilator, they simply removed him from the ventilator. (This was according to his legally attested-to wishes for end-of-life care.) The doctors had determined that he would either breathe on his own, or he would simply be too weak to live without the ventilator and would die. It took less than two hours for him to die. They gave him drugs to ease the pain as best as possible as his life ended.

      He was surrounded by family and friends that day. There were probably 40 or 50 of us in the waiting room, and we visited him for a few minutes each in small groups.

      Degenerative muscular diseases are no joke, and this drug could very well push that survival age further back. Nothing hammers that point home more than watching a friend die.

    55. Re:The alternative by jc42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I could be reading this wrong, but it looks like life expectancy is trending upwards since the 50's. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005148.html

      You could be reading it wrong. Note that it explicitly says "life expectancy at birth". There has been a lot of criticism of this sort of things from statistics-enabled researchers, who point out that almost all of the life-expectancy gains in the past century have been through elimination of most early-childhood deaths. Life expentancy at birth has increased, but the life expectancy of someone 30 or 60 years old hasn't actually changed much.

      There has been a bit of publicity around related topics lately. Thus, there has been a lot of discussion of the apparent fact that the increase in mammograms has produced no measurable increase in lifetime, just an increase in medical bills for the testing (and the "treatment" of false positives ;-). Similar statistical problems have been reported for prostate-cancer screening, and for an assortment of other medical tests.

      Another statistical trick used to make things look better than they are is the common practice of giving cancer survival rates in terms of survival 5 years after diagnosis. This means, for example, that if you were to come up with a new test that diagnoses a cancer 5 years earlier than any existing test, your test would result in a 100% "cure" rate even with no further treatment, and no change in the death statistics. I've heard a couple of interviews in which the interviewer points out this problem, and the interviewee just continues talking about the same "5-year survival" figures.

      In general, it seems that if you're over 10 years old, modern medicine really hasn't done much in increase your (statistical) lifespan, though it is sometimes fairly good at extracting money for treatments that don't increase lifespan.

      (Perhaps some of the treatments improve quality of life, but the statistics for that don't seem to be widely studied or reported. It might be interesting to be shown wrong in this regard, however. OTOH, there has been a bit of media coverage lately of the problems with "treatment" of false positives.)

      (And a more general problem here is that the general public -- and the media -- is generally ignorant of even the most basic statistical concepts.)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    56. Re:The alternative by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Great idea for those of us that can't walk

      Good post, while I'm not in your spot I did break my back in two spots a few years ago. Walking is agony, but I still do it. Usually I take a few breakthrough pain pills first then it becomes a race between "how far can I go, and how much will I pay for this." I used to do resistance paddling in a heated pool, until I found that it aggravated my back and in turn increased the pain. Luckily I can get around mostly on butrans(buprenorphine transdermal patch) for pain medication.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    57. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be useful for astronauts too, since muscle loss is one of the biggest issues with a lack of gravity.

    58. Re:The alternative by Macgrrl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Recent studies have shown that shaming obese people leads to greater weight gain, not weight loss.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    59. Re:The alternative by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's not. Instead of watching that 4th hour of television every night, spend a half hour or so and walk around the block a few times. Cut out all the dairy and wheat products and there you've probably avoided most of the crap that the pill is supposed to cure.

      I literally lost 25 pounds walking a half hour a day and cutting out the dairy, wheat and a lot of the superfluous carbs. At no point did I feel sick, tired or particularly hungry, in fact I felt and looked better than I had in years as my digestive track went back to a healthier state and my blood wasn't full of the crap that's in the usual American diet.

      It doesn't take that much work to eat and live healthily, it just requires some commitment to your heatlh and a willingness to give your body the kind of foods and exercise that it evolved dealing with. You don't need to eat just because it's dinner time, you eat when your body gets hungry, and I mean hungry, not just a craving to eat.

    60. Re:The alternative by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Or you just spend the moderate effort it takes to get enough sleep, cut the carbohydrates down to a reasonable level, and spend a few hours a week walking.

      DNA has very, very little to do with it. Yes, our genome does play a role in it, but our DNA is not programmed to make some people fat asses and other people bean poles, as neither state is one that would result in a long secure life. Our DNA evolved to handle periods of famine and feast. If you're constantly eating, then the body doesn't actually get a chance to recognize the difference between hunger and craving. And if you're eating excessive quantities of carbohydrates your blood sugar is going to be spiking regularly, making you tired until you get another hit.

      If you're cramming poisonous substances like grains and dairy down your throat at every opportunity, of course you're going to be lethargic and fat. It's not your body's fault that you're not fueling it properly. When I stopped eating dairy and wheat because I didn't have them available, I lost about 20 or so pounds within the first month or two, and I didn't gain those pounds back until I started eating dairy and wheat again. I was doing some exercise, but less during the period where I lost the weight and more when I gained it back. And I felt great.

      Ultimately, people who choose to blame others or their genes will never lose the weight because they aren't going to be making any changes that might work. The brain can make you fat if you decide that it's inevitable, trick you into overeating and underexercising and generally turn you into a blob of lard.

    61. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus H Christ. One of the reasons why obesity is so common is because we have to be sensitive to them and pretend like it isn't their own damned fault that they're fat.

      They eat crap, they don't exercise properly, genetics does play a tiny role in all of this, but move more, eat a better diet and the pounds do come off. People who have a healthy body weight are the genetic norm, not the people who are lard asses.

    62. Re:The alternative by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Or you know, people could just go outside for a walk.

      Also, there are "mental health" benefits to exercise that I'm pretty sure the pill won't provide. This pill is kind of scary since we could end up with a bunch of stress crazed, muscular people running around looking for a outlet for their stress.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    63. Re:The alternative by Newander · · Score: 1

      Right, like maybe they'll get people to pay them for pills instead of exercising.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    64. Re:The alternative by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Except that this pill won't bring the benefits of exercise. Sure, it might be useful for people that genuinely can't exercise, but exercise affects damn near the whole body in one way or another. For instance, one way of increasing the amount of tryptophan in the brain available for creating seratonin and melatonin is exercise. Tryptophan has a tough time getting into the brain due to the blood brain barrier otherwise.

      And a pill that would address that would be potentially very dangerous. There's a reason why the barrier exists there, and breaching it on purpose is something that should only be done with great care.

    65. Re:The alternative by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Whooosh

      That's a really worthwhile comment.

    66. Re:The alternative by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      (!fat) != healthy.

      But, for the record, I agree with you... I have a hard time exercising, and not just from long commutes or working overtime - because working more than 40 hours/week is not something that happens very often; but then I get to take my kids to extracurricular activities; my house sucks - I'm constantly working on fixing things and doing yard work (although I suppose that's "exercise").

      I'm tired of taking the hard way to do everything - if there's an easier way that then frees up time to other things, then I don't see why all the jerks here need to get all high and mighty about it because they prefer actually doing the exercise and managed to find the time - the same way I wouldn't belittle them for liking exercise, they shouldn't belittle me for putting my kids above myself, because I do it willingly and happily.

      As it is, I squeeze in exercise where possible, and I don't like when people come up with excuses why they can't do it (although it's not my place to berate them for it, either), but if something comes along to remove that "burden" so they don't have it, then so be it.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    67. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about those who can't? Muscle wasting is a major problem that complicates a variety of injuries and conditions, this could be a breakthrough for many people just wanting to live with more mobility and less pain.

      But then I guess that doesn't occur to the blinkered "fuck you" generation.

      It would be interesting to know if this would be useful for prolonged visits in zero gravity.

    68. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being a "pindick" myself, I personally think anyone who goes around verbally abusing pindicks is a coward.

      But then, being an AC myself, I may actually be full of it.

    69. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think anyone who verbally abuses pindicks is....

    70. Re:The alternative by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      How well has that worked so far?

      ^ This. When people complain that doctors only treat symptoms, and only treat patients using drugs and pills, there's your reason. No one wants to change their habits. Most people death march themselves into an early grave with the pills providing them some mud to slow them down :D

    71. Re:The alternative by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't meant to sound cruel but I've personally never met anyone that was so unfit they could not exercise or change their diet in some way that would help.

      You are young and healthy and have never met anybody who was dealt a bad hand genetically or suffered a crippling accident or infection. Get north of 50 after a life of minor accidents, or hang out with young people who have two pacemakers, biweekly seizures and a heart that leaks blood when it beats, and you'll find that not everybody is physically capable of what you envision everybody as able to do. Sometimes it is as simple as a quick infection of the pericardium and heart as a young child. Other times it is something work related like the other car driving into a ditch atop your ATV while you were both pursuing a suspect in the dark. It can even be their fault: I've known people thrown out of the back of pickup trucks who live with a solid brace bolted into their spinal column. It doesn't matter: it is their reality, and they have to deal with what they can do. Eating well, exercising in the pool, doing exactly what their doctors tell them to, but still unable to really be fit.

      These are the people who need help beyond mere "exercise and a change in their diet". There are people living beyond your sphere of experience who can benefit greatly from things like this.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    72. Re:The alternative by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Of course this drug could be an important aid for those with muscle and joint problems, or for the sick or elderly. The problem comes when it is abused by those who could do real exercise, but can't be bothered to.

    73. Re:The alternative by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Some consider exercise to be more like play than work.

    74. Re:The alternative by muphin · · Score: 1
      I dont think so...
      Central effects
      • Disturbances in level of consciousness
      • Misperceptions and difficulty in interpretation (delusions, hallucinations)
      • Poor judgment and insight (denial of illness)
      • Short attention span, distractibility, impaired memory (particularly recent)
      • Slurred speech, perseveration
      • Disorientation
      • Ataxia
      • Variability (quiet/restless)
      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    75. Re:The alternative by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Not being a "Fat Ass" myself, I personally think everyone who goes around verbally abusing obese people is a pindick.

      Pretty much,

      They are people who are highly insecure in their own body, lifestyle and choices. So in order to make themselves feel better they bully and belittle people they perceive to be worse than them. This doesn't really help them justify their own choices, the doubt they started with is still there.

      OTOH, there are people that are highly secure and try to help fat people lose weight.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    76. Re:The alternative by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Or *keep* watching TV, and watch it while walking on a treadmill... which is what I do.

    77. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard compared to what?

      If you think your life is hard, you can either try to make it easier, or you can adjust your perspective so that it your baseline experience no longer seems hard. You've chosen the former, and thus think the latter is "insane".

      Also, many people do willingly inflict pain and suffering on themselves. Most athletic training programs would probably qualify. Certainly many rites of passage into adulthood do. And there's research which suggests that voluntarily experiencing pain can have beneficial effects on mood.

    78. Re:The alternative by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      That is not, however, the case for most fat people in the US, and there are some cases of quite-fat people who decided to lose weight and did so. See http://www.bicycling.com/training-nutrition/nutrition-weight-loss/i-lost-320-pounds-riding-bike?page=0,0

      On the other side of the argument, I find that my weight (220lbs) is surprisingly resistant to change. I like to eat, and the more I exercise, the hungrier I get. Doubling the exercise moves the set point down about 5 pounds, and it was 15-20lbs higher with no exercise (and that was 7 years ago).

      And the professional sports guys have ruined things for the rest of us. Pushing your hematocrit up like they did is nuts (there were guys in Europe dying in the sleep from too-thick blood clotting), but a 10% nudge in my CV capacity would be right nice (though I am nowhere near anemic).

    79. Re:The alternative by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      The standard biking answer to "bad back" is get a recumbent, though I've never been able to get that enthusiastic about one myself (my back is not bad, but there are various engineering and safety reasons why a recumbent should be "better").

    80. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also mental health and watching that much TV isn't good for you.

      I started running in the mornings about five years ago, cut out almost all television and I'm in the best shape of my life. I actually used to think that being able to run 10km non-stop or do two hundred pushups at once was impossible for me. Now I can do it without even getting tired and without all of the TV, I have clearer thought and a more positive mood. My diet has always been good, since I'm a lifelong vegetarian, so no changes were even necessary there.

    81. Re: The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it is always funny and it makes me feel better about myself.

    82. Re:The alternative by Bremic · · Score: 2

      I don't disagree with your main point, but as someone who put on 50kg over 5 years while dealing with a chronic illness that was misdiagnosed and mistreated, options could be lifesavers. Put on drugs that caused weight retention, and not being able to exercise without having a seizure, was not a good time in my life. Something like this might have meant the 4 year recovery may have been doable in 1 or less.

      There are always reasons that people can't "just do" something that is good for them - not excuses, reasons. I hope that you never have to deal with a serious illness or injury - because it not only knocks you off your lifestyle, it knocks you off your high horse.

    83. Re:The alternative by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Ha! Sure you could, but that's a helluva walk.

      I've been trying to eat normally and lose weight thru exercise. I mostly can't do it.

      I have to eat a _little_ abnormally, restricting my intake to about 1800 calories, and exercising 1000 - 1400 calories maybe 4 times a week. 1 - 2 hrs on an elliptical crosstrainer.

      1800 is break-even. the 4 exercise sessions result in a bit over a pound of loss per week.

      Trouble is, I'm 66, and injure my back quite often. Its weak. Just a little overstress from leaning the wrong way, or turning the wrong way, and I lose a week to let it heal. So, keeping that up is nearly impossible.

      I've lost 13 lbs, but that's over a year. Hoping to do some exercises to strengthen my back, and try again. I've done the insane low-calorie diets, too - Nutri-system is not all that insane, and comes in at about 1400 calories and I lose about 3 lbs a month. I also did MediFast at 500 calories a day and that works, losing 2 - 5 lbs a week, but it is dangerous, and MediFast doesn't sell it any more for that reason.

      I don't think I'm going to achieve my 40 lb target loss no matter what I do, but I'm a little distracted right now, and intend to resume a full attack on the situation in about 2 months, trying simply not to gain anything in the meantime.

    84. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that you need anaerobic exercise to burn fat efficiently, going for a walk is a better option. Unless they are not targeting obese people but bodybuilders that want to lose the last grams of fat.

    85. Re:The alternative by byrtolet · · Score: 1

      You are working yourself to death. Do something different once in a while before you go crazy and kill everyone at your workplace.

      What do you suggest? Walking oneself to death?

    86. Re:The alternative by gubon13 · · Score: 1

      (And a more general problem here is that the general public -- and the media -- is generally ignorant of even the most basic statistical concepts.)

      THAT.

    87. Re:The alternative by HetMes · · Score: 1

      Severely punishing criminals does the same too. We will not be held hostage by the unwilling.

    88. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you are correct that most healthy people probably don't need this there are some who can't do half an hour of walking a day. I'm one of those - I suffer from Chronic Fatigue and arthritis. It's a particularly nasty combo because for the fatigue I need to rest more and for the arthritis I need to exercise more. Weight control is a problem.

      I'd love to just get out there and walk or do some swimming or whatever, but it isn't an option. I've already cut down on calories as far as I can safely go.

    89. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I can't. I've got to work that 11th hour at work, for the fourth day in a row, and then get home so I can eat at least once today.

    90. Re:The alternative by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      It's called 5-HTP - it's pretty safe as long as you're not an idiot.

    91. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're cramming poisonous substances like grains and dairy down your throat at every opportunity, of course you're going to be lethargic and fat. It's not your body's fault that you're not fueling it properly. When I stopped eating dairy and wheat because I didn't have them available, I lost about 20 or so pounds within the first month or two, and I didn't gain those pounds back until I started eating dairy and wheat again. I was doing some exercise, but less during the period where I lost the weight and more when I gained it back. And I felt great.

      Interesting. I get about 30% of my daily calories from dairy (good, whole milk) and another 30% from bread and rice. Not sure where you put 10% calories from mayonnaise in there, although I'm sure you'd consider it poison. My only exercise is the 1500 foot walk to McDonalds. In any case, at 6'2" and 135 pounds, I'm neither fat nor lethargic. It's almost like there's individual variability in human physiology and morphology or something.

    92. Re:The alternative by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Not being a "Fat Ass" myself, I personally think everyone who goes around verbally abusing obese people is a pindick.

      Interestingly, the more obese you are, the more you appear to be a pindick.

    93. Re:The alternative by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Not sure about safety, surely the risks from being even less visible on the road are quite high.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    94. Re:The alternative by antdude · · Score: 1

      Outside? Walk? Please... :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    95. Re:The alternative by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      I think that depends where/how you ride. I see flags on recumbents often enough.
      What they have in their favor is better stopping ability (reduced chance of a flip).

    96. Re:The alternative by lxs · · Score: 1

      I'm only speaking about intent. I'm not saying that it is effective.
      And I may be atypical but this always makes me feel like losing weight. Don't watch if you're easily offended.

    97. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love your kind of post. Made entirely from your own perspective with zero thought as to other considerations, reasons, circumstances, medical conditions and a whole slew of parameters that influence the whole.

      In short: You are an idiot.

    98. Re: The alternative by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Eat less. Try a method like Alternate day fasting. No pills, no charts, no bullshit. Eat regular diet on feast days, 500- 600 in one meal on fast days. You can do it every other day, or 5 days feast, 2 days fast. I'm doing it now and have lost 20 lbs. I haven't had to feed big pharma, or buy some diet guru's book.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    99. Re:The alternative by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Sounds like your employer is violating your rights then. If you're working 11 hours a shift, then you're entitled to at least 2 meal periods. Not to mention several breaks. And apart from the time when you're eating, you shouldn't be sitting through those breaks.

      Sure, it's not as good as 30 minutes of continuous activity, but it's a hell of a lot better than just becoming a fatty.

    100. Re:The alternative by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The obesity rate in the US is over 25% and I think in some places over 30%. Chronic diseases are not that common.

      And yes, I have had to deal with numerous chronic illnesses over the years. I've had digestive problems for years, I nearly starved to death due to a bacterial infection of the stomach. I had a heat stroke and ultra-low sodium levels. Not to mention chronic sleep problems and other brain injury. But, the only times when I feel like crap, it's because I'm not getting appropriate exercise and my diet is crap. You might not notice it now, but if you clean up the diet and get the exercise you can get, you'll see an improvement. Sure that exercise might just be short periods of walking or pedals under the desk while you sit, but any exercise helps.

      You might not be able to do rigorous exercise, but even just walking around the block a couple times a day does wonders. Cutting out the crap from your diet as in pretty much any carbohydrate that doesn't come from a vegetable helps a lot.

      The reason why I'm on my high horse is because all this bullshit about people not being able to exercise is usually just that bullshit. I'm sure that there are a few people that are genuinely bedridden or can't exercise, but those people are rare and usually the result of not bothering to take care of themselves in the first place. Cancer is markedly less common in people that take care of themselves, yes, people who take care of themselves can get cancer, but it's much less common. Digestive problems are often the result of eating poisonous foods like dairy and wheat.

    101. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people will do almost anything to avoid discomfort, and most exercise causes discomfort. Not knowing how much better you feel overall when you're not fat, weak, and sickly, it's almost impossible to convince most people that the discomfort of exercise could possibly lead to a better life than they're currently leading, eating whatever crappy foods they like so much, and being sedentary all day long. Yes, I know I appear to have a dim, cynical view of the average person, but I assure you they've earned it.

    102. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, asshole: Most people are just plain FAT AND LAZY and need to have someone with a bullwhip follow them around 3 days a week for an hour or so to make sure they don't sit back down on the couch and start eating Twinkies again, and by the way you're probably one of the fucking hamplanets I'm talking about, so how about you get the goddamned fork out of your mouth and get your fat ass moving instead? For fuck's sake have some respect for your body, man!

    103. Re:The alternative by Cederic · · Score: 1

      and yet.. dancing for 6-10 hours every week, eating 9 meals a week, eating nothing between meals.. I can gain weight.

      Fuck skinny people and their metabolisms. Give me the pill.

    104. Re: The alternative by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I did that to lose 70lb. Except I didn't feast on the feast days, I still only ate one meal, two at weekends.

      Everybody around me told me I was weird. I kept losing weight. Now everybody's advocating this miracle new diet.

      Then I started eating again on those fast days. Weight came back on. Frankly I'm just bored of not eating, and I get bored of exercise. I'm healthier than most people I know, just overweight, bordering on obese.

      I'd like to lose more weight but 7 meals a week just isn't healthily sustainable.

    105. Re:The alternative by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      I literally lost 25 pounds walking a half hour a day and cutting out the dairy, wheat and a lot of the superfluous carbs.

      Wow. You lost weight by only changing your diet, exercise regimen, and leisure time activities. So simple! Keep it up, you've earned that holier-than-thou attitude!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    106. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Recent studies" don't take into account the nature of "shame"; it would probably surprise people that there are some amazing insights in different schools of psychology as to what the nature of "shame" IS.

      Check out Tomkins Affect and Script Theory, for example. Or the book "Coming Out Of Shame", based on Affect and Script Theory.

      That aside, it's not shaming someone to tell them, hey, you CAN feel great about yourself, you CAN loose that weight, you DON'T HAVE to be trapped on a conceptual treadmill. You CAN alter your genetic predispositions, it's NOT all pre-determinism and fatalistic.

      Yeah, going for a regular walk and cutting out foods that aren't healthy works. Eating more vegetables, cutting out all the wheat and soybean oils and just plain old crap does work. Managing your moods with something other than carbohydrates and refined sugars in crazy amounts DOES work, DOES change your genetic predisposition and gene expression.

      If you feel shame because someone is telling you "yes, you CAN, I'VE DONE IT !", then YOU are shaming YOURSELF. And it's time to CHANGE !

      And you know what ? YOU CAN DO IT.

    107. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that when people who simply say "Hey, what they're trying to sell you, that despair and that acceptance of being unhappy and unhealthy so that they can sell you some product, or sell you apathy, which sells products" are accused of holding out some sort of false hope, or worse, of "shaming" people, then you've bought into a huge scam.

      Most people do not have to be fat. It's a fact. Behaviors ARE linked to obesity. It's a fact. If people feel judged by this, or "shamed" by it, they are doing this to themselves, by consenting to accept a situation that they have CHOSEN, by INACTION.

      You can choose not to decide, but you still have made a choice. THAT is the little caveat, it's the kind of thing marketing people rely on, people's INACTION and acceptance that they are HELPLESS.

      It's a destructive scam, and one that people who have feed themselves of get really excited about, because, you know, they pulled themselves out of despair and want to help other people do it too.

      If you're fat and unhappy, feel unwell, want to BE something else, know THIS.

      You don't HAVE to be. YOU CAN be something else. You CAN CHANGE. Yeah, a LOT of people are BETTING against you, and will do and say things to mislead and discourage you, try to get you to accept that you need to be drugged, that it's not your "fault", that it has nothing to do with what or how much you eat or how little you exercise. They're lying. It's obviously not true. Think about it, and DO something about it.

    108. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone else pointed out, 5-HTP (which is produced by the body from L-Tryptophan) is available and many users (including myself) report that it really helps in improving mood (which indicates that it really helps with serotonin production). You better take B6 and B12 vitamin with 5-HTP though, as these are also needed for Serotonin synthesis.

    109. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least now Huffington Post won't let you shame obese people anonymously.

    110. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since most 10 year olds don't yet have a measurable life-span, it's pretty difficult to get statistics on it. Just saying.

    111. Re:The alternative by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      You mean pointing to the patently obvious and pervasive failure of an already well disseminated idea on a worldwide scale has nothing to do with negating a flippant, backhanded suggestion whose primary purpose was to insult obese individuals?

      Interesting theory you have there....

    112. Re: The alternative by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Just do two days of fasting, and eat normal meals the other days. It seemed like you were trying too hard. I will soon be fasting on Mondays and Thursdays. tomorrow I will have, for my fast day, baked Salmon and grilled vegetables. It will be a wonderful under 600 calorie meal. You need to find a plan you can live with. Remember, it is a marathon, not a sprint. Allow some flexibility. Don't be too strict with yourself.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    113. Re:The alternative by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    114. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How sad they needed a study to show that.

    115. Re:The alternative by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Why would you willingly work less than what your body needs for proper functioning and maintenance?

      Ah, because you're an immature lazy bastard who'd rather other people come up with complex solutions to deal with your unbalanced lifestyle.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    116. Re:The alternative by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the bodies of long distance runners? Not much there to love at all!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    117. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Lol wut? Technology has made our lives easier in innumerable ways. What the hell are you smoking?

    118. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Most birth statistics already exclude prenatal fatalities.

    119. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      You're talking as if being lazy is a bad thing. Best...quality...ever. And with this pill, no one need ever be fat again. Problem solved. And you lose your moral superiority :D

    120. Re:The alternative by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Your body is a machine that is designed to function properly through movement, movement which drives the nourishment and cleansing of your system. Technology, taking away the necessity of movement, is actually doing way more damage by taking away a necessity from the human body and translating it into destruction of the environment just because people are lazy.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    121. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Technology does all kinds of things the body was never meant to do. We were never meant to brush our teeth, use contraception, take life saving antibiotics, or live in air conditioners. In many ways our body is a shitty design. We can do better. And we do.

    122. Re:The alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem that comes is not so much that some abuse a given drug, it's that some who decry the drug abuse decide the others shouldn't use the drug at all. This stifles honest inquiry, promotes hypocrisy, and denies real benefit to those who have need.

    123. Re:The alternative by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      you'll learn one day.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    124. Re:The alternative by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Sure...the ultimate argument. Well done sir!

    125. Re:The alternative by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      I know. I wrote it that way on purpose.

      That is why you write the comments you do.

      Also why you are simply not mentally qualified to critique such topics.

      Let me translate:

      YOUR BRAIN TOO DUMB.

      You got that? I had to shout to get over the sound of your knuckles dragging on the ground...

  2. This can't end well by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it seems too good to be true...

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:This can't end well by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it seems too good to be true...

      Wait until you see the side effects...

    2. Re:This can't end well by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think "getting laid" will be in there somewhere so I welcome the extra eyeball or two...

    3. Re:This can't end well by Russ1642 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screw the side effects. Add it to the water supply.

    4. Re:This can't end well by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Do you get to choose the gender(s) of the person(people) you get laid with (by)? Or do you not really care?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    5. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for anybody that wants to do things with their life. If I don't have to spend time on aerobic exercise, it means that I can spend it on working, or being with my family, or on doing more strength exercise.

      Anybody that finds aerobic exercise rewarding can still do it. The rest of us can spend the time on more productive things.

    6. Re:This can't end well by icebike · · Score: 1

      I think "getting laid" will be in there somewhere so I welcome the extra eyeball or two...

      I suspect in your case your palms will just sprout more hair.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:This can't end well by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you get to choose the gender(s) of the person(people) you get laid with (by)? Or do you not really care?

      I'm not gay, but it's nice to get a little attention every now and then.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    8. Re:This can't end well by RockDoctor · · Score: 2

      Screw the side effects. Add it to the water supply.

      Is it water-soluble?

      Do environmental bacteria look at it and go "Yummy" before tucking in and converting it to some potent neurotoxin?

      Important considerations.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:This can't end well by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      You do realize you wouldn't be a fat lazy asshole on that, just a lazy asshole. It helps if you're going to be an insufferable self righteous douchebag that you at least have a nugget of accuracy.

      There's also a large list of people who medically would massively benefit off something such as this, but go ahead, rail on with your libertarian anarchist ideologies that are destroying society.

    10. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're making our generation look like a bunch of idiots who glorify work for its own sake.

    11. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandmother had much the same attitude about buying your own soap instead of making it from lye and animal fat.

    12. Re:This can't end well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Good for the welfare generation, maybe. Entitled little shits who want everything but don't want to put in the work."

      Are boats just for lazy fucks who are too good to swim, and computers for people who lack the moral fiber for doing math in their heads?

      Why is 'putting in the work', when an engineering solution (may, research is still preliminary) offer a labor saving method of solving the same problem? Is all of applied science and engineering immoral laziness, or is there some special virtue to sweating and grunting?

    13. Re:This can't end well by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      Ignorant regressives will always condemn any form of improvement of society. They won't be happy until were back to living in caves and trees.

      Fortunately, even though they have had a surge in population lately they are all within 10 years of dying as they are either a) very old, b) going to do something so colossally stupid they end up killing themselves, or c) will be another NRA sponsored mass murderer and will have a cop suicide.

    14. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming people that need exercise most are actually drink water and not sugary drinks.

    15. Re:This can't end well by skids · · Score: 1

      What fun would it have to cause a zombie apocaplyse with wimpy, undermuscled zombies? Much better if all the zombies are ripped.

    16. Re:This can't end well by Hartree · · Score: 2

      Oh, the AC will happily use the computers and machines. They're one of the "entitled" ones.

      It's just all those "other" people who are lazy assholes who should be forced to live an 18th century existence.

      It's a lot like when people advocate drastic population reduction. My response is "Ok. You first."

    17. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or c) will be another NRA sponsored mass murderer and will have a cop suicide.

      [Citation Needed]

    18. Re:This can't end well by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Lol what? Fat and lazy we may be my good sir. But assholes? From whence dost thou gather the testicular material to make such a claim? You just sound like those people who claim that "working hard builds character". Why don't you just dig holes and fill them up again all day if you merely want to torture yourself for no reason?

    19. Re:This can't end well by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Good for the welfare generation, maybe. Entitled little shits who want everything but don't want to put in the work.

      What your comment really makes me think of is birth control. Things have changed so much that society is debating whether it's even a moral issue any more, but it sure used to be. Wouldn't birth control just allow people to screw around, and unnaturally separate sex from its biological function, and from marriage? And all that is just what did happen.

      And you could say the same for eating pork, or blood transfusions, which were forbidden by Moses. But now that it's safe, it's hard to remember why it could have been considered a "moral" issue.

      If not now, then within a couple hundred years it's hard to imagine we won't be able to control body fat and muscle mass, in the same way we can control pregnancy. Like breast implants, I predict it will lead to a relatively brief period of action-figure-type physiques, until it is widely available and no longer a status symbol.

      Technology really can challenge and change values.

    20. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it seems too good to be true...

      Twitching away like a heroin addict... Too god to be true?

    21. Re:This can't end well by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that you fell for an obvious troll, being that a libertarian would see the profit in a pill like this.

      You, on the other hand, probably get plenty of exercise beating on that straw man.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:This can't end well by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      To use a computer to solve more than trivial pocket calculator problems, you need to either A) learn to program; or B) learn to use a good program. Think about e-mail: it delivers messages you could just as well get by snail-mail, but you have to take the time to text-to-speech them and listen, or actually read them still. Want to make 3D art or music? You have to learn how to manipulate the medium and how to apply artistic concepts--there is no "art pill" that you pop that makes you an expert artist. Even video games are a matter of building skill through some effort.

      Boats bring safety and, like computers, feasibility into marine situations. You can carry equipment and avoid sharks in boats. You're more looking for an analogy like putting a water jetpack on your back so you can swim in a race, without actually learning to swim or getting strong.

      Look outside. People want to eat at mcdonalds all day, then take green tea pills or megadoses of caffeine or lipitor to lose weight and stay healthy. Gastric bypasses and tying a rope around your stomach so you can't eat so fucking much are the new version of... just not eating so fucking much. Are you telling me something good will come of this "engineering solution," in the same way that something good came of MRIs and ambulances? I think something good will come of this "engineering solution" as with mass media news: people don't have to think to stay informed, rather just take the slop shoved down their throat. That's a huge labor savings over being inquisitive and trying to find any facts for yourself.

    23. Re:This can't end well by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That was basically my only moral issue with abortion. I posited that it would lead to a responsibility separation from sex, whereby people no longer worry about the consequences; these days it seems like sex without a condom is common--this actually surprised and frightened me, because people here fuck random people they just met in bathrooms at bars without rubbers--and the neighborhood I live in has its three top killers as Heart Disease, Cancer, and HIV. Yes, HIV is the #3 primary cause of death in my neighborhood. Clinic gives out free condoms but hell, if you get pregnant you just get an abortion.

      People babble about all this right and wrong stuff, but I just like to point at cause and effect. Absolution of responsibility is a cause, and its effects are often predictable largely and unpredictable in the minor.

    24. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is 'putting in the work', when an engineering solution (may, research is still preliminary) offer a labor saving method of solving the same problem?

      Being a disgusting fatbody is not the problem. It's the result of not dealing with the problem. This doesn't solve the real problem, it helps treat the symptom.
      Unless you're saying the problem is that we don't have enough mice with chiseled abs, in which case yes, this will solve that one.

    25. Re:This can't end well by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      SR9009 is available for research purposes, $150 for 25 mg. From the structure, I would say it's likely to be only slightly soluble in water; also, the only solubility data given is in DMSO. It requires storage by refrigeration or freezing, and comes packaged under inert gas, so I would say its environmental persistence would be rather low. I don't know if a molecule like this would be stable enough for oral administration, actually. In their mouse study, injections were made.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    26. Re:This can't end well by CCarrot · · Score: 2

      Assuming people that need exercise most are actually drink water and not sugary drinks.

      So...add it to sugary drinks!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    27. Re: This can't end well by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I won't say that I expected those details, but I am certainly not falling off the sofa in astonishment either.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    28. Re:This can't end well by srmalloy · · Score: 2

      If the effects prove out, they had better make sure that they test for side effects at absurd overdose levels, because regardless of how it's intended to be used, there will be thousands if not millions of people who assume that if 100mg a day is good, 1000mg a day will be better -- and knowing what the overdose effects are in advance will make it easier to recognize and treat them.

      Not to mention coming up with a workable test to detect its use that the various sports anti-doping agencies will want to use...

    29. Re:This can't end well by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Add it to mountain dew?

      It would be great to see geeks beating hell out of footballers all over the place.

    30. Re:This can't end well by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      IANA-whatever, but the two things that jump out at me are inflammation and endorphins.

      The article says that the drug "influences fat and sugar burning in the liver, production of fat cells, and the body's inflammatory response." A lot of research has been linking inflammation to cancer, so depending on whether or not the inflammation is similar to or at a higher level than that caused by the equivalent amount of regular exercise, it could be a problem, or maybe it would lower it and be safer. Also, there's no mention of whether or not the brain thinks it's exercise and releases endorphins, so while your muscles might get the same benefits as exercise, your body as a whole might not.

    31. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel left out. Nobody ever complains about intelligent regressives. Sure we can make soap, but we can also make lye (from salt water).

      If there's ever a zombie apocalypse, we'll pwn everyone! (I sure hope there are other intelligent regressives, or it'll just be me and a lot of really clean zombies)

    32. Re:This can't end well by hedwards · · Score: 1

      But it has the electrolytes that humans crave.

    33. Re:This can't end well by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, my brain doesn't release endorphins when I exercise. I don't know how common this is, but you might want to consider that there might be a large number of people for whom this is true...most of whom are those who choose not to exercise.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    34. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is 'putting in the work', when an engineering solution (may, research is still preliminary) offer a labor saving method of solving the same problem? Is all of applied science and engineering immoral laziness, or is there some special virtue to sweating and grunting?

      All of applied science and engineering is moral laziness.

      Bring on the pills!

    35. Re:This can't end well by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      Wait until you see the side effects...

      Turning green and having an irresistible urge to smash things?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    36. Re:This can't end well by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1
      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    37. Re:This can't end well by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      or is there some special virtue to sweating and grunting I believe in some circles sweating and grunting is immoral.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    38. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw the side effects. Add it to the water supply.

      Is it water-soluble?

      Do environmental bacteria look at it and go "Yummy" before tucking in and converting it to some potent neurotoxin?

      Important considerations.

      I'm more concerned with angry bacteria that can now kick ass. They've been under represented and trod upon by just about, well everybody.

    39. Re:This can't end well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Only if the lights are on, and it's not for the express purpose of pumping out obnoxious children, or so I'm told.

    40. Re:This can't end well by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Are boats just for lazy fucks who are too good to swim, and computers for people who lack the moral fiber for doing math in their heads?

      Damn straight.

      Fuck computers.

      I typed this comment on an old typewriter. After all, one spelling error and you retype that entire fucking page.

      Erm.. this is sarcasm for the humourously impaired.

      Why is 'putting in the work', when an engineering solution (may, research is still preliminary) offer a labor saving method of solving the same problem? Is all of applied science and engineering immoral laziness, or is there some special virtue to sweating and grunting?

      The pill only seems to work on the physical side of things... and only part of that. It seems to work on aerobic exercise which means it wont do much for muscle development (read: bulking up), so you'll likely still need to be sweating and grunting for that one.

      Also, it will not help people who get sick from poor diets, I doubt it will reverse Type II diabetes if they keep consuming sugar at a monstrous rate. Being thin is not always a sign of bad health as there are dietary problems that dont cause you to put on weight yet are just as bad.

      OTOH, being ripped is also not as healthy as people think. Even ignoring the steriod use, most can only maintain that much muscle for a few years before they start to have serious issues. The majority of people who lift weights at that level will develop joint injuries (shoulder, knee and hip are popular) and are forced to tone it down.

      But these are extreme cases, fortunately for the rest of us there are a happy medium. Personally I prefer weights over cardio but the key with lifting is to do the exercise properly rather than to lift the heaviest weights you can. Doing more reps at lower weights will build muscle and burn fat just as well. The really good part is that because your form is correct you'll increase in strength gradually whilst avoiding the joint injuries that typically accompany high impact weight lifting. I see people doing two really bad things whilst lifting, 1. Lifting way beyond their abilities (pushing yourself a little is good, pretending you can lift 70 KG when you can only do 40 is stupid) which often leads to 2. Poor form, because they cant lift the high weight properly they do the exercise wrong, leaning or hunching wrong causes the exercise to use the wrong muscle group and this often leads to injuries.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:This can't end well by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel better, no one's brain releases endorphins during exercise. That's a myth: http://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/runners-high

    42. Re:This can't end well by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Says the guy who doesn't grow all of his own food and didn't even bother to build his own home by chopping down trees and milling the wood himself.

    43. Re:This can't end well by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Next thing you know, people will start just buying or renting their homes instead of chopping down trees, milling them into lumber using hand tools, and building their homes themselves. Good thing you and I are not one of those lazy people who rely on those "engineering solutions".

    44. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, my brain doesn't release endorphins when I exercise. I don't know how common this is, but you might want to consider that there might be a large number of people for whom this is true...most of whom are those who choose not to exercise.

      How could you possibly know that, particularly given how little is actually known about the reward pathways associated with exercise? Do you expect to jump on a treadmill for 10 minutes and feel like you've just taken a hit off a crack pipe? For most people it takes years of regular exercise to start to really notice the effect of endorphin release during/after exercising. Exercise is like smoking: at first it makes you throw up, and then you become addicted. The difference is the magnitude of the addiction and the time it takes to develop.

      There are people out there who truly struggle with physical disabilities or crippling genetic abnormalities, but in reality virtually everyone under 40 who is out of shape simply doesn't maintain a diet appropriate for their level of physical activity. Many delude themselves, thinking that they are special little snowflakes for whom staying in shape is impossibly harder than for anyone else. The excuses are usually along the lines of "slow metabolism" or "I have an old injury that makes it impossible for me to exercise," but "my brain doesn't release endorphins when I exercise" is my new favorite.

    45. Re:This can't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP should have emphasized the following part of the product page:

      "...for research use only and are not to be used for any other purpose, which includes but is not limited to, unauthorized commercial uses, in vitro diagnostic uses, ex vivo or in vivo therapeutic uses or any type of consumption or application to humans or animals."

      It is never a good idea to advertise therapies before they have been even tested for safety in humans.

    46. Re:This can't end well by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      You seem rather confused, if death isn't sufficient disincentive to avoid sex why would pregnancy be? I'd be curious to know where your "'hood" is, unless it's in sub-saharan Africa your claim seems quite unlikely. When it comes to babbling about right and wrong, you seem to indulge in it yourself, with your implicit assumption that there is something wrong with "responsibility free sex", something that has existed for as long as sex itself.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    47. Re:This can't end well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      "The pill only seems to work on the physical side of things... and only part of that. It seems to work on aerobic exercise which means it wont do much for muscle development (read: bulking up), so you'll likely still need to be sweating and grunting for that one."

      Oh, I don't have any significant optimism about the broader utility of this drug(heck, it might not even work on humans, or cause cancer, or horrifying hypertrophy of the muscles that control eye movement, or who knows what). I just objected to the notion that there was something 'wrong', immoral, or lazy about achieving exercise results by non-exercise means.

      For the moment, if you want the benefits of exercise, you have to exercise. That much is to be admitted. If improvements in engineering obviated that requirement, though, all the better. Doing things the hard way isn't superior virtue, it's what you do because the easy way doesn't work.

    48. Re:This can't end well by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's not "responsibility free" when you can get/pass herpes and HIV. The illusion is there though.

      Page 33 of the development plan addresses health concerns. The top five causes of death are, in order from most frequent, Heart Disease, Cancer, HIV, Stroke, and Drug Overdose. Heart Disease is a catch-all for "natural causes, but not old enough for my tastes". Welcome to the hood.

    49. Re:This can't end well by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      I did mention the "for research purposes" part, but yes, I should have emphasized that means analytical chemistry methods and in vitro testing, not running your own clinical trial. Honestly, I didn't mean for the sales quote to be taken seriously- the poster I replied to speculated on the properties of this mysterious compound, and I just thought it was funny that with a little Googling, I found it not only identified, but available for sale. I can't imagine anyone actually ordered some based on my post, but yeah, this stuff is not in any way meant for human use. Up to 4% impurities, and it's likely that those impurities, like SR9009 itself, can cross the blood-brain barrier. And many carbamates are cholinesterase inhibitors, which is to say, nerve agents.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    50. Re:This can't end well by HiThere · · Score: 1

      OK. What I know is that exercise doesn't make me feel better or happier.

      Now this was true even before I had injured myself exercising, so I don't believe that this is due to injuries or physical disabilities. And at one point I was on the track team, so I HAVE exercised sufficiently to have experienced the effect were it present. (I clearly don't do that anymore, and the injury is only one of the reasons.)

      OTOH, if I remember back to when I was 8, the effect was then present. Perhaps it was social reinforcement? (I didn't experience that on the track team, as I was never speedy, merely strong. So my area was shot-put. And even there I wasn't exceptionally good. But we all trained at all the events ... except pole-vaulting. Only a couple of people trained for that.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  3. SR9009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I prefer a drug known as SR388, which allows me to latch onto people's faces and drain their energy.

    1. Re:SR9009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better move to the tropics, then, or you'll be right fucked come winter.

    2. Re:SR9009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if someone happens to shoot him with a missile.

  4. Speculation by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Biology being what it is, it's reasonable to think that the health benefits of exercise are a multi-factor phenomenon and that any one chemical will deliver fewer benefits than the real thing.

    Then the odds are that the drug won't be bio-equivalent to the chemical signals released by real exercise and will have side effects as a result.

    1. Re:Speculation by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or it could also be the exact opposite, perhaps it will give us the benefits of exercise without the downsides, such as the increased wear and tear in the body that exercise causes.

    2. Re:Speculation by internerdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, somewhere in between, where severely obese people can get into shape necessary for regular exercise by going through the pill regimen or by supplementing or weaning themselves towards regular exercise. Or otherwise healthy people can use the pills to maintain the benefits of exercise while recovering from an injury or disease preventing regular exercise.

    3. Re:Speculation by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Citation: just wait a few decades, then tell me that wear and tear isn't anything to be concerned with.

    4. Re:Speculation by skids · · Score: 1

      Wait another few decades and then you'll understand, yungun.

    5. Re:Speculation by berashith · · Score: 2

      that sounds like cocaine. all of the fun of a high heart rate, none of the bother of getting off the toilet.

      most exercise doesnt really have wear and tear. that rumor gets consistently rebuffed by scientific methods.

    6. Re:Speculation by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 2

      Not true. I have always had a very large frame, and even when at a "healthy" BMI, my weight is about 260 lbs. Years of jogging/running and playing soccer (yes, I know, soccer...I was too much of a geek to ever think of playing football, much to several coaches' lament) have left my knees painful, popping, pre-arthritic degenerative wrecks. Actually, come to think of it, it's probably for the best that I never liked football.

      Unfortunately, my doctors have only just recently told me that I should have avoided such high-impact exercise once I hit 235-240 lbs (which I did by age 19). The human body just isn't designed to carry around that much weight (even if it is fairly well-toned muscle). Cartilage can only take so much pounding before it begins to degrade. Biking and elliptical machines are about all I can do for cardio work anymore, and even that hurts like a bitch afterwards. I'm in my mid-thirties, and looking at knee replacements in the next 10-15 years. Yay. At least pro athletes who have to deal with this nonsense have a career (and hopefully a lot of savings) to look back on and say "It was worth it." I'm just an overly-large Unix Engineer (who's weight, now that I can't run anymore, is closer to 300 lbs now—biking just isn't cutting it like running did...sigh).

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    7. Re:Speculation by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Cycling should be actually pretty easy on your knees, but only as long as you do it right. Do you have optimised your sitting position? Are the crank arms of the right size for you? Do you use clipless pedals?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Speculation by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

      Personally, my knees are shot, I have a missing ligament in one knee, and I have severe osteoporosis, and I'm on drugs that inhibit heart rate (which is a problem for cardio exercise, you get out of breath very quickly when your heart just won't speed up anymore).

      Partially the result of genetic disease affecting kidneys, partially due to a work-related accident that blew out one knee (sideways). Stuff happens. As you get older, the chance that stuff has happened stops being chance and becomes certainty. And all that wear and tear piles up whether natural or artificial.

      Citation? visit a nursing home, or talk to people over 40. Almost everyone over 40 will have some story or another.

    9. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limiting the discussion to the first world, I question how much wear and tear on the body the average person's exercise routine adds. I work out about two hours total a day monday - friday. An hour at the gym before work and an hour riding my bike at night. otherwise, I'm sitting at a desk or on a couch.

    10. Re: Speculation by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      I've never been properly fitted or anything...I just have a medium quality mountain bike I ride on the trails around some local parks. Yes to clipless pedals...the idea of having my feet attached to the bike terrifies me! Remembering to pop them out before trying to put a foot down seems like something I'd have a hard time mastering! ;)

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    11. Re:Speculation by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      Biology being what it is, it's reasonable to think that the health benefits of exercise are a multi-factor phenomenon and that any one chemical will deliver fewer benefits than the real thing.

      This is true - for example, this almost certainly won't do anything for improving glycogen stores - but it'd certainly help for people who have been bedridden, the elderly, chemo patients, etc. It may also provide an easier start for people who are badly out of shape.

      So many people abandon fitness kicks because the first few times it's really unpleasant/hard; it's a bit sad because the human body is actually pretty responsive and adaptive, and especially if you're in lousy shape, gains can be substantial if you simply give it a chance. For example, someone bikes into work for the first time, and they find it exhausting, so they say "meeeeh" and the bike gets sold or disappears into the basement. Except if they'd simply stuck with it for about a week or two, they'd find it easier and easier every day (note: it's totally OK, and good for you, to take a day or two off if it feels like you need it. The volume of training by 'serious' athletes might surprise many. It's also not particularly intense. It's just focused and smart, and yes, rest days are taken by even elite competitors.)

      Also note: for those of you who have thought about biking for transportation or commuting but don't want to because "I'd get all sweaty": Slow. Down. Throw an extra X minutes in for your commute. Seriously. Just slow down. Bicycles are *the* most efficient form of human transport. For the same energy as walking, you can be doing significantly more speed. More speed = more cooling wind. Hottest day ever recorded in my city last year, and I biked in to work.

    12. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bones need some impact to stay strong and healthy. I can see it now, the pill makes your muscles strong and your bones weak. Broken bones become endemic...

    13. Re:Speculation by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Increased wear and tear? For real? Citations?

      Knock yourself out. Only not literally, because that would hurt.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    14. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but doesn't it seem kind of stupid?
      Sure, they develop the muscles, but what about the bones? Athletes have denser bones, not just bigger muscles. This seems like just a different version of steroids.

      One other thing, the human body acquires resistance to drugs after a while, how would that resistance affect the human body?

      Despite all that, I think if has some really interesting possibilities for people with certain heart conditions.

    15. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please look into some of the following, and always consider _quality_, often ratios of the amino acids in food is more important than sheer quantity.

      important aminoacids for the protein matrix in bone. one of these is proline. you can assist your body to repair damaged joint capsules.

        Tryptophan in your diet. in most plant sources it is in the outer seed casing, which is why if you eat walnuts while you are talking flecks of this coating can provoke cough as the path to the lung is high in MAO-A and the metabolism of tryptophan etc, is connected to the triggering of this reflex; basically dont eat refined grains. getting as much trp from meat as you expect from a nutrition values table, can be a problem when the animal diet is low grade, find grass fed. same with eggs/poultry.

      trp status is inversely correlated with appetite for carbos. under the presumed evolved conditions of this behaviour the insulin from the carbs would increase trp transport to the brain by decreasing serum levels of competing large neutral aminoacids, as the insulin would cause them to transport to muscle.

    16. Re:Speculation by rHBa · · Score: 1

      Or otherwise healthy people can use the pills to maintain the benefits of exercise while recovering from an injury

      I wonder how long before 'athletes' are using this?

    17. Re:Speculation by IwantToKeepAnon · · Score: 1

      Or it could also be the exact opposite, perhaps it will give us the benefits of exercise without the downsides, such as the increased wear and tear in the body that exercise causes.

      It is the downsides from exercise that are the benefits though. (normal exercise ending well, not broken bones, torn ligaments, etc...) It is the micro-tears that the body repairs that make muscles and bones stronger. How can the drug simulate that? Will we have stronger people with weak skeletal systems? That would cause a dangerous imbalance and more broken bones than now. Hmmmm.

      --
      "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." -- Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy
    18. Re:Speculation by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I am not optimistic- gains in bone mass for instance are caused by micro-cracks that develop from impacts. It's pretty easy to see how a pill could create well muscled people with a fragile frame, cartilage and tendons.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    19. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current thinking is that "wear and tear" is a result of ignoring short-term overuse injuries and running while hurt, not from stresses incurred from running in an uninjured state after appropriate build-up and accommodation. I'm 52 and have been running for decades, doing 1 or 2 marathons a year, and have never had the slightest issues with my knees. I don't personally know anyone who has had knee problems turn up after successfully building up to long distances. I do know people who ran into knee problems from trying to build up to a marathon too rapidly. IMHO (I'm not an exercise physiologist, but I am a physician and a distance runner) chronic problems usually arise when people ignore acute injuries and keep running anyway.

    20. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you call "Wear and tear" is also the body's cue to remodel bone and strengthen cartilage, not to mention the beneficial effects on cardiac and smooth (intravascular) muscle. If taken to an extreme without thought for the negatives (such as when people play competitive sport where winning a tin cup is the aim, or those who train badly or who just want to get a more muscular body at any cost) then exercise can be very damaging, but if done within one's own capabilities, exercise is good for the whole body, not just skeletal muscle.

    21. Re:Speculation by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Increased wear and tear? For real? Citations? Cause I'd say, the level you need to be at for increased wear and tear and rediculous

      I'm pro-exercise but it does cause wear and tear and that does accumulate over time. That doesn't mean exercise isn't worth it, moving around a huge fatty body causes wear and tear too.

    22. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competitive sport will do that to a person. You end up training for the wrong goal.

    23. Re: Speculation by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      What you mean are platform pedals, clipless are the exactly these you are afraid of.
      On the other hand, they actually are easier on your knees, if the cleats are aligned correctly. If you are afraid to use them, try Shimano Click'r. They are very easy to release, even if you are in panic or falling. Magnetic pedals are even better and don't need to be aligned, but decent ones are difficult to get, and bad ones (Mavic for example) are useless. And you really ought to fit your bike correctly, cycling is only painful when you do something wrong. It is not complicated, there are a lot of instructions how to do it on a lot of websites, you just have to take some time and do it properly.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re: Speculation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, when I went looking for pedals with clips on them, I couldn't find any that would fit my feet. Fortunately it was only for an exercycle, but GEE, my feet aren't THAT big. I'm only size 15. Big, yes, but not really unusually big.

      OTOH, the way I injured MY knee was improper yoga. Then I exacerberated it by hiking a few years later. Now.... well, I mentioned an exercycle. Yes, I have one. But I really hate using it. So instead, if the weather is at all decent, I walk for half an hour a day. Which isn't enough, but it's about all I can take over a period of time. (If I do something that I dislike very much, I won't keep doing it.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    25. Re:Speculation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You don't need for "most exercise" to lead to injury, for "exercise over time leads to injury" to be true. Just do something wrong once, and you may never recover. I tore a kee cartilage. Nothing serious. Only problem is that knee cartilage never repairs itself. So now my knee was weaker. And this lead to another injury, which tore it a bit more. ...

      So far this has happened three times, and I really don't want it to happen a fourth time, so if you don't mind, I'll use handrails to bear my weight when going up or down stairs, and I won't run, and when going downhill, I'll go very slowly. Actually, the pain causes me to limit my walking more than that cursory list indicates.

      Your opinion strikes me as both ignorant and arrogant, though of course it's impossible to be sure with a limited text message.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    26. Re:Speculation by berashith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is a large segment of people that will say things like " running causes arthritis in your knees". This is what I was directing my comment at. Running, on its own, does not cause your knees to become weak or necessarily damaged. There is a chance of an injury occurring, but that does not mean that people should not exercise in general.

      there is nothing different from "exercise over time leads to injury" and "being alive for a long time leads to injury" . Sitting at a bus stop has risks, sitting in your house has risks, walking anywhere can have one bad step that can do absurd amounts of permanent damage. None of this means that exercise will cause injury.

      I have a permanent injury to a shoulder, so I somewhat understand your perspective .It happened from several odd falls, and then one day it came out while lifting a bucket and tore things up when it slid back in. I will never be able to do a pullup unless I can nearly one arm it with the other side.

      My statement is not ignorant, it was targeted at people who are misinformed and loud, and the opposite of ignorant. Like I said, because of science. If it is arrogant, it is only because of the number of times I have to hear the nonsense about the cause (not risk) of injury being exercise.

    27. Re:Speculation by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop you swimming.

    28. Re:Speculation by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Which in theory this drug would solve.

    29. Re: Speculation by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      You might try "Lake" shoes. I have a hard time making sense of their size charts, but some of them seem to come in size "50" which is equivalent to 15. Be careful which one you select -- $ome of them are $omewhat $pendy. They're pretty nice -- I bought a pair of winter MTB shoes back when I thought cleats were important (the price is breaktaking, but they really are nice, and the lifetime warranty on the Boa laces is legit).

      Or are you looking for toe clips? I think you could fit clipless on an exercycle -- that's kinda non-standard, but I am in no position to throw those stones -- and use bike shoes to click in (to "clipless" pedals, of course). One thing you might consider is quick-release pedals so you can swap them out -- MKS EZY, you can easily get clips ("Cube") and rat trap ("Promenade"). The one you probably want for non-clipless is MKS EZY Rezin, apparently only available from UK ( http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/mks-resin-ezy-detachable-pedals-prod14015/ )

    30. Re: Speculation by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      You should probably get fitted, or at least read about it. Almost all of the books I've seen give about the same decent advice. The 90%-effective saddle height rule is that if you put the heel of your foot on the pedal axle (not the way you normally pedal) at maximum extension your leg should be dead straight -- no liftoff, no knee bend. That tends to maximize efficiency, power, and knee life. And your normal pedaling setup should have the balls of your feet over the pedal axle, more or less. If you catch yourself shifting from side to side when you pedal, that's too high, knock it down by 1/4-inch increments till you are happy. A little less height than the rule-of-thumb "optimum" is no big deal, but you want to avoid having your knees bent too much. I'm also assuming you are 6' tall or more, in which case there is no need to worry much about crank length (once you adjust gearing for reduced leverage, shorter cranks, e.g., 165mm instead of 170) are slightly easier on your knees. Tall guys with good knees sometimes go for 172.5 or 175.

      Other rules of thumb -- too high is bad for your hips, too low is bad for your knees (plus you'll get serious burn in your quads).

      Once you get close and find your happy place, you'll find that a millimeter here or there will make a difference -- the saddle tilt should be just so, the seat height, etc.

      And if your knees are dicey, aim for a lower gear -- not spinning wildly, but back off from mash-mash-mash-mash. I'm 53, some days my knees feel a little off, I baby them till they are warmed up. Also, keeping them warm on cold days is a good thing.

      I'm lucky enough that all this works like physical therapy for me, but if it doesn't work for you, find a professional. And you may have the sort of knee problem that cycling doesn't help -- those are not common, but they happen.

    31. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could also be the exact opposite, perhaps it will give us the benefits of exercise without the downsides, such as the increased wear and tear in the body that exercise causes.

      You mean the non-existent downsides that out-of-shape people make up to convince themselves that they will be better off in the long run, when all those gym rats and running addicts are limping around with steel rods where their spines used to be? Exercise, when executed properly has no downside. All the bullshit you have been fed about running being hard on the knees or weight lifting being bad for the joins is exactly that: bullshit.

      Let's look at the "wear and tear" that weight lifting inflicts on the body. Setting aside the increase in bone density, stronger tendons and ligaments, increased immune system, increased metabolism, and increased neuromuscular efficiency, it strengthens stabilizing muscles, which reduces the risk of injury and decreases the wear on joints. Any decent physical therapist will tell you that dead-lifts are an excellent preventative exercise for lower back injuries. You can even do them with kettle balls if barbells scare you. Squats likewise are excellent for knees, pull-ups and bench presses for shoulders, and on down the list. Granted, elite athletes like Olympic power lifters may develop injuries over time, but they are pushing their bodies to the limit, much like gymnasts.

      Now, before you but, but, but, notice the caveat: when executed properly. You can, of course, injure yourself exercising, but it is not as if there is a finite distance a body can run in a lifetime before falling apart... sorry for posting as AC, but I don't want to undo mod points.

    32. Re:Speculation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Running, on its own, does not cause your knees to become weak or necessarily damaged.

      Bending my knees causes abrasion and damage to the bone. Running exacerbates that and adds tissue damage and impact damage.

      So yes, running does cause my knees to become damaged.

      It also hurts, and leaves me barely able to walk. I could run everywhere for an hour and use a walking stick for the next week, or I could just not run.

      Tell me, am I ignorant or are you talking bullshit? Note that your answer needs to take into account the very real evidence I can provide merely running over to kick you in the teeth if you even fucking pretend it doesn't hurt me.

    33. Re: Speculation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Not a real problem. Since it's just an exercycle I switched the pedals to non-clip pedals, and I just don't use clips. I don't use it that hard, or that often, so that seems a good enough solution.

      FWIW, several brands of shoe come in my size, and probably even larger. And I'm sure that they could be ordered larger than the store normally carries.

      I was really just expressing my astonishment that pedals with clips were all too small.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    34. Re:Speculation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That didn't happen until after the cartilage was first damaged. Afterwards, things are different.

      OTOH, there are many ways to damage cartilage. The most common one is probably habitually sitting too long in a chair. This deforms the shape, making it too thin in a place where it should be thicker. *This* makes it easier to tear. And after that, then running CAN damage you.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. Re:I call bullshit. by sycodon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soon, there will be two kinds of nerds: Those on SR9009 and those they beat up.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  6. Needs a catchier name by senorpoco · · Score: 5, Funny

    XtremeShred, Fatbusterone, Buffadrine2000. Additionally they should only market it using annoying popup ads and late night television.

    1. Re:Needs a catchier name by eudas · · Score: 1
      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    2. Re:Needs a catchier name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SR-388?

    3. Re:Needs a catchier name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PowerThirst.

      Seriously. Look it up on the tubes.

    4. Re:Needs a catchier name by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      THIS! XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Needs a catchier name by G-forze · · Score: 1

      Weight Gain 4000

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    6. Re:Needs a catchier name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It binds to and activates a protein called Rev-ErbAalpha

      There's your catchy name: REVERB! IT GOES TO ELEVEN!

    7. Re:Needs a catchier name by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

      How about "steroids"?

    8. Re:Needs a catchier name by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Bravo!

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  7. The End by CasualFriday · · Score: 1

    So this is how the population explodes, eh? Well it was going to happen somehow.

    --
    Raters gon' rate.
  8. Side effects. by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will probably work great... except for the anal leakage.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Side effects. by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      I will probably work great... except for the anal leakage.

      Sorry, that side effect is patented by Olestra. You need to find another one.

    2. Re:Side effects. by assertation · · Score: 1

      I can see adult diapers becoming fashionable among celebrities now.

    3. Re:Side effects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Olestra was a life saver when I was in prison.

    4. Re:Side effects. by Ryyuajnin · · Score: 1

      but there's always depends...

  9. Skeptic by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    I'm just going to file this in the "Deeply suspicious" file, shall I?

    But you all try it, let me know how it goes.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Skeptic by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      But you all try it, let me know how it goes.

      No, they'll stick with their usual MO -- do minimal testing, say there's no evidence to suggest it's harmful, get it approved, and wait until people have been using it to 'discover' side-effects.

      In all probability, they will have fudged their numbers to have excluded people with those effects as outliers.

      That's how they've been doing it for years.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Skeptic by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to file this in the "Deeply suspicious" file, shall I?

      But you all try it, let me know how it goes.

      I'm sure that was the initial response to Zyban and Viagra, too...

      You never know, could be legit. Not saying I'd line up for it or anything, but if it were to become commercially available in a few years, I could see giving it a try to help shrink my stubborn spare tire...not big enough to make me care enough to actually hit the gym more often, just big enough to be annoying. Meh.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  10. Such optimism in the summary by Impish · · Score: 1

    I love the way the summary talks about the diseases this could help fix.

    You know what the Scripps Ranch business types are really thinking: "OMG, we are going to *own* the diet industry!" cha-ching!

    1. Re:Such optimism in the summary by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      If this actually did something medically beneficial, I don't see why they shouldn't also use it for the diet industry and make a profit on it too.

      The problem is, like many drugs, there's going to be side effects. There's a very slight chance it won't, but something like this is very likely to have serious health effects unless they got incredibly lucky. Screwing with metabolism is not a simple process. Needless to say, this is not something I would use without both trials, and a number of early adopters to watch their reaction.

      However, if there weren't side effects, then I don't see the issue. There are other reasons to go outside than to stay fit. I don't see why you have to force people into one mode of staying fit, if you don't actually need it. It's like people who insist on doing things the hard way because that's the way they've always been done. If I'm fit and I don't have to sit in a gym for three hours a day, I'd say that I could use that time much more productively, and I don't even mean necessarily making money, I mean learning things or working on personal projects.

    2. Re:Such optimism in the summary by geekoid · · Score: 1

      every drug has side effects.
      The questions are: Is it harmful? what percentage does it occur in? Is it worse then what's being treated?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Would probably be outlawed... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Steroids, contrary to the public perception, can be used responsibly and with few health consequences, especially by men, to more easily lose fat and gain muscle.

    It's not quite a free lunch, you can't sit on your couch and become Ronnie Coleman, but it will accelerate things.

    Oops, sorry. Because we must protect the "integrity" of sports (and the money they bring in) we decided Steroids should be scheduled drugs

    They'd probably do the same thing if something like this actually worked.

    1. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Nos. · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's terrible to think that professional sports players should actually be rewarded for training and talent rather than drugs.

    2. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's terrible to think that professional sports players should actually be rewarded for training and talent rather than drugs.

      except the roids only work if you use them in combination with training and have tallent. roids don't magically make you have the coordination to catch the baseball or throw a football.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of us shouldn't be punished for someone else's lack of self-control either.

      Drug abuse is ultimately a self correcting problem.

    4. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      can be used responsibly and with few health consequences

      Other than these.......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by pla · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's terrible to think that professional sports players should actually be rewarded for training and talent rather than drugs.

      You mean, like the old timers? Good ol' Babe Ruth, he didn't need any steroids! Oh, wait, yes he did (ctrl-F "sheep's testicles").

      Let 'em use whatever the hell they want, and get the FDA the hell out of moralizing our biological mediocrity.

    6. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Applekid · · Score: 2

      Steroids, contrary to the public perception, can be used responsibly and with few health consequences, especially by men, to more easily lose fat and gain muscle.

      It's not quite a free lunch, you can't sit on your couch and become Ronnie Coleman, but it will accelerate things.

      Oops, sorry. Because we must protect the "integrity" of sports (and the money they bring in) we decided Steroids should be scheduled drugs

      They'd probably do the same thing if something like this actually worked.

      Considering all the pressure on athletes to break records, I would expect a Juice League to earn much more than their non-steroid counterpart, as it would be more exciting for the fans.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    7. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rewarded for random genetic gifts rather than for investing the skills to learn when to apply drugs, you mean?

      I've got my arguments against allowing drugs in sports - primarily, that they tend to push the sport on so much that everybody in the sport would effectively be forced to use it, and they have side effects - but "reward for talent" (== won the genetic lottery) isn't one of them.

    8. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I think the gynecomastia (growth of moobs) and testicular atrophy (tiny, shrivelled balls) should be highlighted.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's terrible to think that sports players should actually be rewarded.

      What a freaking waste of time and money.

    10. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, it's terrible to think that professional sports players should actually be rewarded for training and talent rather than drugs.

      I'm so sick of people lecturing me about how bad steroids are, so why don't you SHUT UP! I've got half a mind to come over there and RIP YOUR HEAD OFF just for saying that! What? You gonna look at me like that? THAT'S IT!

    11. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by DutchUncle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never understood why you can't get them (perhaps with a doctor's prescription) if you're NOT participating in anything where they are banned. I'm not a pro athlete, I'm not looking to cheat anyone, I'm just a man over 55 who would like my workouts and cycling to be as effective as they were 20 years ago.

    12. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, for one, might actually tune in if genetic engineering can bring us horrible, superhuman, freak-athletes.

    13. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's terrible to think that professional sports players should actually be rewarded for training and talent rather than drugs.

      Drug testing in sports is an intelligence test used to fool the gullible.

      Only athletes too stupid to use drugs in ways that can be detected are caught, and the gullible such as you are fooled into thinking that means drug use is eliminated or reduced in professional athletes.

      How often did Lance Armstrong get caught? Zero. The only reason Alberto Contador got caught was because the test for clenbuterol suddenly got about three orders of magnitude more sensitive. (Interesing contrast in the way Armstrong and Contador are treated, isn't it? Same teams, same support people in both cases (Brunyeel...). One is the target of a Monty Pythonesque post-career witch hunt, the other one has the UCI making excuses for him....)

      Of couse, before drug testing in cycling really got serious even the great Eddie Merckx failed tests. Yep - Merckx failed drug tests at least three times.

      And that's just cycling.

      NBA basketball? Once a player has been tested a certain number of times in a season, he can't be tested again.

      The fact is allowable/detectable drug levels are known, drug metabolism rates are known. It's easy to stay under detectable/allowable limits - unless the athlete is stupid.

      And that's not even getting into whatever undetectable/designer drugs are available.

      I figure if there's money/fame to be had, the athletes are pretty much all dirty.

    14. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Nos. · · Score: 1

      As opposed to... just about every profession out there?

      Sure some, are less obvious, but don't we reward singers, writers, artists, etc. based on their talent (along with other factors as well).

    15. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's even easier than that. Be at least 40, male, not involved with professional or competitive sports, and finished fathering new kids, then go visit an endocrinologist to complain about low testosterone. Home run!

      Jesus god, though, Vitamin T sends your sex drive off the scale.

    16. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Nos. · · Score: 2

      Sure, but there are plenty of professional athletes that compete without the help of drugs. Shouldn't they have more respect that the ones who cheat (and by cheat I mean breaking the rules that are in place).

    17. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I actually condone proper use of those, as in mexico, europe, and the US, it is accepted as being normal to sometimes need them....
      Here in Canada, you just mention the word, and everyone thinks you are criminal...

      Imagine all the people, living in a world where you just go to the pharmacy and get what you need....

    18. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by skids · · Score: 1

      How many pecs do you have? TWO? I have THIRTEEN!

    19. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can be used responsibly and with few health consequences

      Other than these.......

      Which part of "can be used responsibly and with few health consequences" from GP's post, or "Most of these side-effects are dose-dependent" from wikipedia article did you not understand?

    20. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Steroids aren't banned because they're unfair. They're banned because in some cases their harmful and in others we don't completely know what they do to people. I had friends in college who were big roiders and they had all kinds of mental issues and the stereotypical aggression. IMO a lot of the mental problems we're seeing in some football players are probably more attributed to PEDs than head trauma as there isn't much consistency with who suffers and who took the most headshots.

      Besides, I am not of the opinion that players should have to compete against guys using illegal PEDs when they *may* be sacrificing their future well-being in doing so. You're basically telling every bubble player he has to roid up to compete or maintain his livelihood. That's why so many baseball players are pissed at the steroids generation of baseball players with inflated stats that will probably never been touched.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    21. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Did..did you read it?
      He tried it, it made him, ill then didn't do it again.
      So..no impact on his numbers.
      Yes, lets take poor kids, train them for a sport they might get into, and then let them poison themselves in order to make the next dollar, all so you can enjoy your game

      The worlds a hell of a lot more complex then you seem to think.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Even casual sports fans know that the Babe's chiseled physique was courtesy of prodigious frankfurter consumption.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm so sick of people lecturing me about how bad steroids are, so why don't you SHUT UP! I've got half a mind to come over there and RIP YOUR HEAD OFF just for saying that! What? You gonna look at me like that? THAT'S IT!

      And all this time I thought roid-rage was a media scare.......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    24. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "can be used responsibly and with few health consequences"

      There is a real huge 'citation needed' on that claim......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro, do you even lift?

    26. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Considering all the pressure on athletes to break records, I would expect a Juice League to earn much more than their non-steroid counterpart, as it would be more exciting for the fans.

      A way to test this, look at Tour de France viewership as fans over time have gained the expectation that all athletes are juicers.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    27. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but there are plenty of professional athletes that compete without the help of drugs. Shouldn't they have more respect that the ones who cheat (and by cheat I mean breaking the rules that are in place).

      There are? You know this how?

      The current crop of baseball players denouncing Alex Rodriguez sound just like Rafael Palmeiro did before he got busted for using steroids.

    28. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      Hey, we've given people more than that for winning the ovarian lottery, so why not?

    29. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by heathen_01 · · Score: 2

      Testicular atrophy is temporary and Gynecomastia can be reversed.

    30. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Why should access to steroids be limited because they're banned in some sports leagues. If I want to take some steroids because I think they'd help me, why should the fact that other people aren't allowed to take them stop me?

      Automatic transmissions are banned in a lot of auto racing series, should we ban them for normal cars too?

    31. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or should they be looked down upon for not doing everything it takes to get to their full biological potential?

    32. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Justin Carter? Is that you?

    33. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      i have got an idea why not have two leagues organic and roid muncher league

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    34. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It really shouldn't come as a surprise that synthetic testosterone makes people more aggressive, since natural testosterone does the same thing.

    35. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by pla · · Score: 1

      Did..did you read it? He tried it, it made him, ill then didn't do it again.

      Right. And if it hadn't made him sick? If it had worked like modern synthetic steroids? Barry "*" Bonds would have nothing on Ruth or Aaron with another good decade in their careers to whallop another 2-300 homers. Intent matters more than outcomes, though - If they could have, they would have.


      Yes, lets take poor kids, train them for a sport they might get into, and then let them poison themselves in order to make the next dollar, all so you can enjoy your game

      Okay, sounds good to me. We pay them far, far more than the best-of-the-best who actually contribute to the good of humanity. I have no problem with our modern gladiators destroying their bodies in the process, to at least earn that fat wad o' cash.

    36. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by PPH · · Score: 1

      But the gossip in the women's locker room is forever.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    37. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    38. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steroids - no. You are probably thinking about growth hormones, HGH, IGF-1. Those are almost free of side effects. Unless you overdose in which case the side effect is premature death.

    39. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never understood why you can't get them (perhaps with a doctor's prescription) if you're NOT participating in anything where they are banned. I'm not a pro athlete, I'm not looking to cheat anyone, I'm just a man over 55 who would like my workouts and cycling to be as effective as they were 20 years ago.

      You can. Go to a doctor and get your testosterone level checked. Most men over 55 have low testosterone and can get their doctor to prescribe some testosterone supplements. I used to work out with a guy in his 50s that was on it. He could bench press over 300lbs. It seemed to work for him. It's not steroids, but its the same idea.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    40. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood why you can't get them (perhaps with a doctor's prescription) if you're NOT participating in anything where they are banned. I'm not a pro athlete, I'm not looking to cheat anyone, I'm just a man over 55 who would like my workouts and cycling to be as effective as they were 20 years ago.

      Probably has something to do with the doctors having a responsibility to not provide would-be drug peddlers with product. Now, if you could arrange for in-clinic injections, then there might be a chance.

    41. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to open this up to professional athletes now!! I can imagine a day when baseball fans go to games just to watch the players arms pop off after whiffing a ball.

    42. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      So? Have you seen the side effects for pretty much any drug when not used correctly? I said _can_ be used responsibly, not _must_ be used responsibly.

    43. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It literally is steroids, that's what replacement Testosterone is. One of the most effective steroids is good old fashioned Test. But generally your doctor will not take you to levels above that of a normal 20 year old man, for example.

    44. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2

      No, I'm thinking of Steroids. If you do them right they are quite safe. You need to manage your dose, and manage aromatization to Estrogen, make sure your blood pressure doesn't get too high, etc.. But it's all very doable. And vastly safer than the side effects of obesity.

      Most of the nasty shit from steroids happens when you're trying to gain 100 pounds of muscle that you could never carry naturally and you're on 10grams of various shit a week.

    45. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Right. I'm actually really interested in finding the source of your information. How are you so sure that a person can take enough to help them grow, without harming themselves? What are the correct procedures?

      I spent some time a few years back looking for this kind of information, and I couldn't find anything reliable.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    46. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MY PECS HAVE PECS!

    47. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by MillerHighLife21 · · Score: 1

      Rewarded for random genetic gifts rather than for investing the skills to learn when to apply drugs, you mean?

      I've got my arguments against allowing drugs in sports - primarily, that they tend to push the sport on so much that everybody in the sport would effectively be forced to use it, and they have side effects - but "reward for talent" (== won the genetic lottery) isn't one of them.

      There are some aspects of sports that involve winning the "genetic lottery". Most, however, happen from putting in a lot of time, dedication, repetition and work into understanding how to get better at what you do. Lots of NBA greats have done it that way and so have guys like Tiger Woods. There are the occasional genetic freaks like Shaq but so much is just hard work.

      I'm a big college football fan and half the fun of following the sport is the science and different ways that coaches figure out to mold their teams in a manner to take advantages of most opponents weaknesses. Right now offenses with almost no time between plays are the trend and operate by entire offseason conditioning regimes that allow you to ensure the other team wears down before yours does. In order to pull that off, the entire team follows specific nutrition protocols that largely influence what they eat and when they eat it. Certain weight training programs help to build speed, flexibility, endurance while others work for sheer power and muscle gain. It's really amazing sometimes.

      While I have zero doubt that there are a lot of people in every sport who abuse steriods whether we know it or not, they should absolutely be banning anything that has even a SINGLE negative side effect and testing for it heavily. The argument you cited above is the only one you need: if they're not banned then everybody is simply forced to use them which isn't fair to anybody. That stuff trickles down to the high school level players that just want to show off or the parents who want to live through their kids.

      --
      "Don't teach a man to fish, feed yourself. He's a grown man. Fishing's not that hard." - Ron Swanson
    48. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is still far less than the side effects of alcohol use/abuse. Many steriods (I'm talking about the illegal supplements, not carbohydrates that would technically be a anabolic steroid) have side effects yes, but when taken in a controlled dosage it's not like most people will become angry monsters with shrivelled private parts. It's a benefit vs risk question. Do the increased effect of training and increased motivation weight more than potential side effects.

    49. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabolic_steroid#Psychiatric_effects

      A 2005 review in CNS Drugs determined that "significant psychiatric symptoms including aggression and violence, mania, and less frequently psychosis and suicide have been associated with steroid abuse".

    50. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure because I did it, illegally, 12+ years ago. All the information in the world is out there if you spend time going through it and assessing it. I even manufactured Trenbolone from cow pellets with no ill effects, which frankly seems insane to me now but I was a bit of a dumbass back then. Had I had legal access to high quality shit it would have been much safer.

      As for the source of my information - google. There are tons of reputable bodybuilding sites and forums with very smart people. There are also a handful of well known gurus out there, and you can cross-check information and verify it that way. And like any other Internet information, there are some real dipshits out there - but like I said just verify it by consensus and reputation.

      Really you just need to mind the dose, make sure you handle aromatization, and make sure you do post-cycle therapy so your nuts don't cease production of natural T.

      And that's for _illicit_ use. If your doctor could easily prescribe it and monitor your health, it would be even safer. As it stands, they have to be almost as careful prescribing Testosterone as they do Oxy.

    51. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Missing the point. If you allow drugs then any athlete who wants to be at the top of his game will be forced to use them, or they won't be competitive. Many drugs are fine in moderation but when all the pressure is on to win it is hard to moderate their use. Look at how screwed up many WWE wrestlers are, and that isn't even a real sport.

      The arms race will be bad for everyone.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    52. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Okay, sounds good to me. We pay them far, far more than the best-of-the-best who actually contribute to the good of humanity. I have no problem with our modern gladiators destroying their bodies in the process, to at least earn that fat wad o' cash.

      Maybe you know it, but
      1. These professions come with glamour.
      2. People who don't know better would want to enter it, regardless of consequences. At least until they know better.
      3. With the human body the way it is, typically a "sports star" has to start training way before adulthood. Where adulthood is defined as legally "knowing better". And this legal fact roughly mirrors moral idea of age of "knowing better" for many people in the jurisdiction.
      4. Most wannabe "sports stars" fail to be sports stars but do well in other professions, content with following the game and playing amateur. Their one time ambition for sports stardom only enriches their life, typically improving their health. The time they wasted on the ambition would have been wasted on something else anyway, childhood and adolescence being what they are.
      5. Now, in the "steroidally enlightened" world, even when these "failure" kids grow to be an adult and now officially "know better", they are unfit for any other job, or even life itself. So now, an immature ambition in a child costs him his life.
      6. Everyone is immature at some time in their life.

      You might be fine with it, but I completely understand how lots of people are not. I am with them.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    53. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Sure, but there are plenty of professional athletes that compete without the help of drugs.

      Unless you count water, sugar, protein and other "normal food" substances. These things all give a competitive edge to athletes over those people who choose to abstain from them... really, what's the difference?

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    54. Re:Would probably be outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think most humans would want to look like Ronnie Coleman.

  12. This one won't work either by davidannis · · Score: 1

    What makes the fancy scientists think that this will be any different? I've given my wife 5,000 excuses for not going to the gym. They never work.

  13. Re:I call bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be comforting to "know" that a study must be false by virtue of the fact that you disagree with its conclusion.

  14. Ethyl-3-(((4-chlorobenzyl)((5-nitrothiophen-2-yl)m by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always thought exercise mimicked the beneficial effects of drugs.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  15. Oops by Bovius · · Score: 1

    I guess that money I shelled out for an exercise bike to slouch on while I watch Food Network shows was wasted, huh?

    1. Re:Oops by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess that money I shelled out for an exercise bike to slouch on while I watch Food Network shows was wasted, huh?

      Turn your exercise bike to face away from the TV, turn on Fox and Friends and pretend they're chasing you. Those extra pounds will come off in no time. :-)

      [ Ahhhhh... Steve Doocy is right behind me .... Must... peddle... faster... ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Oops by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I guess that money I shelled out for an exercise bike to slouch on while I watch Food Network shows was wasted, huh?

      With no evidence to support this whatsoever ... I'll say 90-95% of all home exercise equipment eventually becomes a place to stack clothes or something like that. Probably within the first 3-6 months.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Oops by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or, depending on your politics, try MSNBC: "Rachel Maddow is after me! Peddle for your life!"

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Oops by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      My brother's wife got an elliptical after having their first kid, it got used for a while now it is a coat rack {she got most of it off in about 6 months}. They are not the only people I know with coat racks made from exercise equipment so I'm going to agree with you. {I had a coat rack that looked like a stationary bicycle in the 90s}

    5. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only exercise machine I ever bought that I kept using after 6 months was the Kinect.

    6. Re:Oops by skids · · Score: 1

      Probably about that much, but the phenominon is not limited to excercise equipment. Stuff seems to accumulate on any surface left unused for more than an hour.

    7. Re:Oops by Vary+Krishna · · Score: 1

      Or if politics isn't your thing, there are all sorts of options in reality TV. Jersey Shore! Real Housewives of Somewhere or Other! Help! They're coming for me!

      Oh God, Here Comes Honey Boo Boo! Move! Move! Move!!!

    8. Re:Oops by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      True, but in my observation, once stuff gets piled onto exercise equipment, it never gets used as exercise equipment again.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Oops by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

      I spent 8 years on dialysis, which amounts to 3-4hrs 3/week of watching tv. A shocking number of obese diabetic patients (on very restrictive diets) spent the time watching the Food Channel. It just can't be good for you to lust after a bunch of meals that are direct violations of the diet everyone in the room knows you should be on. I mean, there is a dietitian walking around the place... (who usually brought in samples of sugar-free cookies and punch she'd made for holidays).

      Once had a whale of a woman tell me "I never had a problem with the diabetic diet". Other than maintaining her 300lb weight, no she didn't.

    10. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think regardless of your politics, either Steve Doocy or Rachel Maddow work equally well.

    11. Re:Oops by HiThere · · Score: 1

      In my house the exercise bike has stuff piled on it in late spring, and the stuff stays there until the rains start. Then it's pulled off, and used occasionally until the bad weather is over. But it's NEVER used regularly. Or for long at a time.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:Oops by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Or, depending on your politics, try MSNBC: "Rachel Maddow is after me! Peddle for your life!"

      Or for the Australian's, Parliament Question Time.

      Although if Nick Xenofon ever gets back in, you might just fall asleep.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Oops by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      An exercise bike with the generator dynamos to produce electricity, a television tuned to a Here Comes Honey Boo Boo marathon, and a volt meter that turns the television on if the output from the bike drops below a certain level.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  16. Captain America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 70 years late, still good :)

  17. Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When one MUST commute 45 minutes one way, work a ten hour day, commute another 45 minutes - traffic permitting, eat, do chores, etc .. getting proper exercise is challenging to say the least.

    I'm a real fitness nut and I have to plan my day pretty carefully and set some strict limits on other people's demands on my time.

    It's extremely difficult in technology since the culture is to live to work and live at work - if you're not constantly in front of the computer, then something is wrong with you.

    1. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      one MUST commute 45 minutes one way, work a ten hour day, commute another 45 minutes

      No, just no.

      Or you value your life very little.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, just yes. There are a lot of us in this position, especially post-recession. In some professions, it was the only way to keep your job, as all the "job creators" got "more efficient," largely by laying off half the workforce and expecting the rest of us to pick up the slack at the same or lower pay.

      Dropping the job that is slowly killing you in favor of something a bit more active, despite being a killer talking point, is often not an option in light of debt load, family, and other monetary demands.

    3. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No.

      Change jobs.

      Change professions.

      Change homes.

      Change debt loads.

      I've done all of those over the last decade to get to where I can bike to work in 10 minutes, sleep 8+ hours, have dinner with my family, and run around with the kids. It can be done. But only if you value your life outside of work a little more.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's all? Change careers, move, declare bankruptcy, and generally screw over your entire adult life? And all you have to do to accomplish this is "value your life." If only more people had access to the wellspring of your knowledge!

      Climbing Mount Everest can also "be done," but it requires more than a passing interest in mountains. You don't do anyone any favors by implying that your suggestions are trivial.

    5. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't do anyone any favors by implying that your suggestions are trivial.

      I implied no such thing. If you can't see they're not trivial, you have bigger issues.

      I quit my job, moved across the country (without selling my old house), without a cushy job to fall into, just so I could spend more of my life with my family and less of it having to work to pay for that.

      So don't whine when you say you can't. You're just scared to.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit my job, moved across the country (without selling my old house), without a cushy job to fall into, just so I could spend more of my life with my family and less of it having to work to pay for that.

      So don't whine when you say you can't. You're just scared to.

      And justifiably so...

    7. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's right, dear. You know this anonymous internet stranger's life and circumstances far better than he does himself. If it worked for you, it MUST be feasible for everyone!

    8. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Really? Saying it can be done is not saying it's easy.

      You read way too much into that. Which is your issue.

      And I have plenty of responsibilites. Renting house on the other side of the country, while changing jobs to get one that gives me the right work/life balance, kid in the hospital for a week that insurance left me with a $10k bill.

      But you're right, it can't be done. If you're scared.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      No arguing that. I shit my pants for a year before and a year after making the leap to fix my life for the better.

      No way I would go back now though.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by bhagwad · · Score: 0

      I think you're just jealous that people will be able to get the benefits from exercise without having to workout. No other reason to explain why you're so butthurt. Sorry dude - you ruined your life for nothing.

    11. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      How exactly did I ruin my life?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by geekoid · · Score: 2

      And for everyone who did the successfully, dozens end upon the street.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Doubtful it's dozens to one.

      But poor or no planning will land you on the street.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. No more whoring myself out for corporate life. Just not worth it compared to having any real quality of life. The pursuit of money and power is not rewarding for sane people

    15. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by JazzLad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thank you, was reading the entire thread before doing so, but was about to make the very same comment. I am sick to death of successful people suggesting that all you have to do is exactly what they did to be successful.

      It's not that I'm a failure, I am quite content with life at the moment, but I have had enough life experiences to know better than to think that friends of mine that struggle more than I do are just lazy or stupid. We all have our own burdens and situations and not everyone will be in a better position if they quit a horrible job.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    16. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I think you're just jealous that people will be able to get the benefits from exercise without having to workout

      Oh, they probably won't. It's highly unlikely that this drug will give you *all* the assorted benefits of physical exercise, e.g., the positive influence of exercise on the health of mental healthcare patients.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm NOT a fitness nut and get very little exercise except walking. However, I moved to a house a few blocks from work and three buildings from a bar/restaraunt. I use very little gasoline and have lots of free time. An hour and a half on the road? What a waste!

      And ten hour days? WHY?? I work a 40 hour week and earn the median income. Do you really NEED that Tesla, McMansion, and 200 inch TV set??

    18. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure... all they have to do is care. Oh, and plan out every detail. And file for bankruptcy. And abandon virtually all of their life goals to start anew.

      It keeps getting a little harder every time you tell it. I expect the Spanish Inquisition to burst in at any moment.

    19. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      It takes me 20 minutes to bike to work. I do that every day except Thursdays, when I run in instead.

      I work out most lunch hours at the gym next door.

      I own my own house (albeit with a mortgage). I am a professional engineer.

      I used to weigh 250#. Now I weigh 160# and teach spin classes.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    20. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For many people, it's not just poor planning, it's an unwillingness to make the sacrifices needed to be frugal.

      My mortgage is ridiculously low because I bought a smaller, older home with solid "bones", and redid the plumbing and electrical myself. We chose not to have kids, though I have friends who do and still keep their expenses down by living simply. We grow some of the more expensive produce ourselves and barter when feasible. I drive a clunker I bought for cash (runs great, looks like crap). We generally buy with cash or go without until we can. We don't have much in the way of maintenance medical expenses because we stay active in the course of our daily lives. I do consulting from home. Outside of the occasional camping vacation we don't spend much beyond our nut.

      Yes, we look poor from the outside. It beats looking rich but having no savings and being in debt up to your eyeballs. The stress from maintaining that illusion will get to you eventually.

      Obviously this doesn't apply to people who are either truly wealthy, or truly poor.

    21. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      one MUST commute 45 minutes one way, work a ten hour day, commute another 45 minutes

      No, just no.

      Or you value your life very little.

      If I had points i would mod you up. I completely agree. What is the point of making lots of money if you are left with no time to enjoy it?

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    22. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      He never said it was trivial, he just said it could be done.

      Maybe it's not for you, you have to find your own way though life.

    23. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Will it give an advantage to elite athletes?

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    24. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I work out most lunch hours at the gym next door.

      I wish I could do that, I tried a few times and never managed to get back to work in less than an hour and a half, and that was by rushing my workout and showering and changing in a hell of a rush.

      If you don't mind me asking what does your workout consist of that you can get though it so quickly? Do you just do a 5 minute cardio warmup and hit the weights at max weight for 1 set or something?

    25. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Yes, god forbid someone plans a major life change.

      Sorry I didn't document my whole life story up front.

      It's your negativity that keeps you whining anonymously.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    26. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by X-Ray+Artist · · Score: 1

      You're just scared to.

      Or maybe you've just given up and can't believe that things could be better/different. Change can be scary because while it is always different it isn't always better.

      --
      I would have a sig but I am too busy updating programs and restarting my computer
    27. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There's even more to it than that. It also requires good timing, which can largely depend on luck. E.g., I retired slightly early, but this turned out to be a very good thing, because a year later all the benefits were cut. I couldn't have planned it. It was luck, albeit I, and many others, had gotten a bit nervous when we looked at the direction the employer was headed. Some retired earlier than I did, and by picking a safer route, reaped fewer benefits. Some couldn't retire yet, and ended up being punished for hanging on. Some gambled that it wouldn't be so soon, and lost. I had about 6 months to a year leeway, so I would have been a bit better off if I had hung on for another 3 months. I couldn't tell. The final timing may have been due to the stock market crash. Anybody could predict that was coming, but nobody could say when.

      So planning doesn't suffice. Comitment doesn't suffice. Etc. You can try to manage the factors that you can control, but there are also external factors that you can neither affect or forsee.

      Please note that I don't mean to denigrate your chosen path. It works for you. But among the factors that has enabled it to work is luck.

      P.S.: With enough luck even a lousy plan can work. And some successful people will reccommend lousy plans because "It worked for me".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    28. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I assume it will be banned for them before they even try to use it. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    29. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      I am the complete opposite of a "morning person" but I get up half an hour early to allow time to exercise before everything else. It's the only way I know how to make sure that (check all that apply) overbearing bosses, well-meaning friends, the spouse, kids, traffic, etc. don't somehow manage to come up with some reason for me to not exercise later in the day. Take your exercise time off the top at the beginning of the day and that way no one can take it away from you. It's not selfish. Being dead or ill doesn't help the people who think their stuff is more important than your exercise.

      Oh yeah, my commute is more like an hour each way.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    30. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by HiThere · · Score: 1

      He wasn't even convincing at that. I believe that he did it at the time that he did it. This is in no way proof that he would be successful were he to try it today. Lots more information would be needed.

      (Even believing that he did what he says he did when he did it is giving him credit that he may well not deserve. Repeated questioning by various posters has illuminated various costs and penalties that his original statement didn't imply, and we have no reason to believe that they have all been revealed. You may claim "Well, he didn't say that there weren't other things you need to do or have" and that would be true. But his implication was that he had revealed the way, and by concealing [i.e., not revealing] obstacles and requirements he is effectively lying. And laws may well have changed since he did whatever he did, so it may no longer be legal. Or perhaps it was illegal then, and he just got away with it. [This often happens in perfect innocence, as there are so many laws on the books that nobody knows them all.])

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    31. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Good for you. I, however, have a bad knee, which I injured doing exercise. In my 30's. There was no gym next door to where I worked. Etc.

      It's also true that even though I was once on the track team I have NEVER gotten ANY enjoyment in exercise...well, not since I was around 8. I have a profound envy of those who do, but I despise them when they claim that I "should" exercise.

      Yes, I would be healthier were I to exercise more, provided that didn't involve bending my knee or standing on my feet. But their enjoyment of their exercise doesn't entitle them to claim that I would feel better were I to exercise. As it is I try to walk half and hour or more every day, but even that much isn't a pleasure, and I do my utmost to distract myself from the process.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    32. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Mondays I go to Zumba.
      Tuesdays I teach a vigorous spin class.
      Wednesdays there's a weight class.
      Thursdays it's yoga.
      Fridays I tend to go to another weight class.

      Now, I'm tweaking my body for endurance and not bulk. I'm sure that there's people who are like BRO you aren't lifting enough! I shower after spin, but not after the other classes.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    33. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Usually they are rather trivial, just most people choose to dismiss alternatives rather than try them.

      For example, I subscribe to t-mobile for about a third the price of my neighbor who is on verizon, and we both use our phones in the same places. But he's too afraid to try t-mobile because he hears about their coverage not being as good. Whatever.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    34. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by alfredo · · Score: 1

      They will find a way to mask it. Look how long Armstrong was able to hide his use.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    35. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Like throwing garbage out the window of your car, one person doing it works just fine without problems. When everyone does it, you have a mess on your hands and it doesn't work anymore.

    36. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My brother took the 'quit the horrible job' route. He is only 4 years older than me, but after a life of living on the street, spending time in jail because committing crime was the only way to eat when you can't hold down a job, and drug use to escape the hell that he made for his life, he looks like he could be my father instead of my brother.

    37. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      P.S.: With enough luck even a lousy plan can work. And some successful people will reccommend lousy plans because "It worked for me".

      All of these people could be perfect examples.

      http://www.calottery.com/win/winners-stories

    38. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, how old were you when you made this change? I ask as one who is (probably) quite a bit older than most /.ers, but interested in a change.

    39. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always live closer to your job. You could also bike to work. You could also work out on your lunch break. There are three options right there.

    40. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem very interesting. Perhaps they should make a TV show about your awesome experience overcoming adversity. Oh wait - no one cares. I hope that you get laid off and your wife leaves you.

    41. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of brother are you, that you left your brother on the street with no food?

    42. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      It takes me 20 minutes to bike to work. I do that every day except Thursdays, when I run in instead.

      I hope for your coworkers' sake they have a shower at work that you're allowed to use. Ewww.

    43. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by BranMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually. I work a 9/80 work week - 9 hour days, every other Friday off. Add in a lunch break and it's 91/2 to 10. 45 minutes each way commute is about what I have too. That's just a normal 40 hour week - no overtime. When I do overtime, it's more like 11-12 hour days, but that's not too often (1-2 times a year maybe?).

      A lot of us aren't killing ourselves at work and have that schedule.

    44. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      It's not all doom and gloom Marvin!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    45. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I shower after spin and runs. Otherwise I hardly break a sweat.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    46. Re:Exercise is a luxury in US culture by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's reasons to be scared of trying that. What you suggest is not guaranteed to work.

      You didn't have a cushy job lined up, and counted on being able to get a job that would work. That's hardly guaranteed. You could easily wind up living a thousand miles from anyplace you've got personal support with rapidly dwindling savings.

      You are lucky with your house. There's a whole lot of things that can happen to a house being rented. Most of them are much easier to deal with when you're not across the country. If you've got a relative or good friend who has volunteered to take care of things for you, great. Not everybody has one where they're moving from, and there's questions like how much free work can you expect out of your friend or relative when things go wrong. There's no particular reason you won't wind up with no rental income, thousands of dollars of repairs to get done remotely, and still have the house payment.

      You were able to deal with an unexpected $10K expense in situations that must have strained your finances. Congrats; many people can't take that in stride. The ideal of six months' savings frequently doesn't work in practice for young couples with children. Now, what happens if your kid needs more expensive medical care, long-term, and the insurance companies call it a pre-existing condition? You've spent a lot of money already, may be getting drained by the long-distance house, and that house doesn't give you a place to live.

      So your job doesn't demand long hours and has a reasonable commute? Good. How certain were you of finding that job? You're the new guy there, so if there's a temporary dip in the economy you're back out pounding the pavement. Got a backup plan in case you can't find another job that's close, pays enough to cover your increased needs, and doesn't require lots of overtime?

      Where did you move to, where you can be assured of jobs you like that pay adequately, cost of living is low enough for you to get by, schools don't suck, etc.?

      So, it's great that it worked for you. Some people are scared because there's an excellent chance, if they try this, that they'll wind up unable to support their children in a reasonable (not affluent) manner. You seem to disregard all this and think that, just because you were sufficiently lucky, anybody who tries to emulate you will also be sufficiently lucky. It really doesn't work that way.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    47. Re: Exercise is a luxury in US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if he's in good shape, he probably doesn't have to. I used to work with this guy that didn't have a car and biked 10 miles to work every day. He wasn't really sweating, looked no different than I did walking from my car. If I tried to do that, I'd need a shower, but he probably didn't really get his heart rate up that high.

  18. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the curing of disease will be what interests people in such a pill

  19. Make it a beer additive by rtgree01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That way I can work on my 6-pack

    1. Re:Make it a beer additive by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      That way I can work on my 6-pack

      Bah, why have a six pack when you can have an entire keg? ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  20. Impacts all muscles by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A drug that tricks the body to respond as if it has been exercising will work on all muscles. Real exercise only works on the muscles that you use. Overuse of this drug would be expected to cause muscle growth where you don't want it. Bulk up those facial muscles.

    Sure, in limited cases, this could be great. I'm thinking of cases where people can't exercise, using this in low doses to reduce the length of rehabilitation. Stuck in bed for a month or two due to a car accident? This is for you.

    Of course, if it works, it will be abused. Need to get that extra edge for the Tour de France?

    1. Re:Impacts all muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sounds like something perfect for extended periods of space flight.

    2. Re:Impacts all muscles by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny

      A drug that tricks the body to respond as if it has been exercising will work on all muscles. Real exercise only works on the muscles that you use. Overuse of this drug would be expected to cause muscle growth where you don't want it. Bulk up those facial muscles.

      Why yes I would like to lift a car by wiggling my ear.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:Impacts all muscles by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      When you consider the morbidity and mortality inflicted by inactivity-related health conditions, being concerned about its effect on sports is pretty close to the attitude that somebody would need to say something like "I wouldn't want Korea to get embroiled in full scale war because it would probably increase RAM prices."

    4. Re:Impacts all muscles by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      People and animals lacking myostatin have abnormal muscle growth, yet they don't appear to be messed up in the face. And it doesn't sound like this drug causes musclebound mice. So I'd guess no it wouldn't cause you to look like a steroid-freak.

      I do think you're right that it will be abused. This is why we can't have nice painkillers or weight loss pills.

    5. Re:Impacts all muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty close to the attitude that somebody would need to say something like "I wouldn't want Korea to get embroiled in full scale war because it would probably increase RAM prices."

      I'll take self-interested asshats desiring peace over rational casus belli any day of the week.

    6. Re:Impacts all muscles by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

      extra muscle would be useful for sprinters, but not for GC cyclists. There you want aerobic capacity and recovery. Extra muscle is just extra weight to haul around, consuming aerobic capacity, thus requiring more recovery.

    7. Re:Impacts all muscles by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Stuck in bed for a month or two due to a car accident? This is for you.

      Also para- or quadriplegics, who often wind up with consequences of not being able to stay in shape.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Impacts all muscles by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but there are a couple things to consider...

      When most people exercise, they're exercising "key muscle groups". Your body needs time to heal between exercising those groups and so people work on other groups. But those muscle groups are

      In particular, core strength is neglected, as is muscle fitness. Ever see those guys who are about 5'10" and 230lb of bicep muscle at the gym, "pumping iron"? Yeah, tehy're roided out, mostly. It's weak muscle because they're training for muscle size not strength. Strength training is what this drug 'mimicks'. It's not going to result in people looking like that, but it might help those meaty wimps gain some real strength. (I say that as someone who infrequently 'works out' but has worked hard my entire life: no, I'm not exceptionally strong, but I still have had to increase the weight on the machines after coming after those guys - and I look like a toothpick.)

      Additionally, when someone is (say) doing bench presses to bulk up their shoulders and arms, ever look at their faces? Chances are there's some intense concentration; their entire bodies are tensed, not just the muscle groups they're focusing on. Those other muscles get used, too.

      You

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:Impacts all muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you are talking about.

    10. Re:Impacts all muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is why we can't have nice painkillers or weight loss pills.

      Amphetamines are overrated for weight loss (I take them for ADD). Oh, they do a good job of preventing hunger during the day... but when they wear off at midnight and you're about to crash into bed... omg... carbohydrate cravings and outright nauseous starvation from hell. You'll inhale anything you can get your hands on, then pass out immediately afterwards so it gets metabolized directly into fat.

    11. Re:Impacts all muscles by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Real exercise only works on the muscles that you use.

      Actually muscle growth comes mostly from the metabolic alterations your body suffers after exercise, when it triggers, all your muscles get to grow, even if they where not used. That's why it's stressed over and over again that you should exercise your legs in order to have muscle growth, even when you want to have big shoulders. This is because the legs are the biggest muscle group in your body and exercising them triggers the metabolic mechanism responsible for muscle growth.

    12. Re:Impacts all muscles by jbssm · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. Perhaps the secondary effects don't out-weight the benefits for normal circumstances where you can just exercise instead of taking the drug. But it might well be a great step to allow astronauts to maintain a much healthier physique during long journeys in a zero gravity environment.

    13. Re:Impacts all muscles by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      While true, I have seen examples of one leg growing much bigger and stronger than another leg of the same person at the same time. Reason - a knee problem forcing him to subconsciously use one leg for most exercises.

      So not completely true.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    14. Re:Impacts all muscles by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean amphetamines. There are a lot of weight loss pills out there that work, except people want them to work faster so they take more and it kills them.

      For example, DNP was the one I was thinking of.

  21. Better living through alchemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm....now if I can combine that with my viagra and rogain...

    1. Re:Better living through alchemy by Hartree · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I first read that as "now if I can combine that with my vagina and rogain".

      I'm not quite sure if hilarity ensued. It certainly gave me pause...

  22. How about a drug that cures laziness? by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would have the same beneficial effects of SR9009 plus the laundry would always be done.

    1. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You mean (meth)amphetamines? They do tend to help you lose weight...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      How about a drug that cures laziness

      Meth?
      It's got some bitchy side-effects, but I hear it's one hell of an upper. The sort of thing that tired immigrants drift to when they desperately need to keep awake or lose their hand in the looms. Or whatever immigrants lose their hands to now a days.

      I also hear you can party all night on cocaine.

      If you want something with a milder punch, stick to caffeine.

    3. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It would have the same beneficial effects of SR9009 plus the laundry would always be done.

      Amphetamines really put some pep in your step. Legal, too, if you can find a reasonably service-oriented shrink... Plus, they've been tested for safety on millions of children!

    4. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      No. I've known utterly wired meth heads that were just as lazy afterwards, but, man, were they really tense about it.

    5. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by bhagwad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude...I've built up my laziness carefully over the years. Nurturing it and giving it the freedom to breath and achieve its potential. Why...oh why would I want to take something to destroy all my patience?

    6. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      No. I've known utterly wired meth heads that were just as lazy afterwards, but, man, were they really tense about it.

      I believe I've identified the issue. It's sorta like how rogain stops working after you stop taking it. Or how the muscles go away after you stop steroids. Or how coffee doesn't do anything for me the day after. Which is kind of a good thing. There are times I want to sleep.

    7. Re:How about a drug that cures laziness? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Laziness is generally due to someone not seeing that working hard is in their own interest. This is why servants and slaves are always "lazy". This is why bureaucrats are often lazy. Because doing their job well doesn't benefit them.

      Now, admittedly, laundry is a different problem. Perhaps it's a sign that the person with the problem has been spending the entire day at a job were they are not rewarded for perfoming well, and as the mental attitude is not consciously chosen, it also can't be consciously shucked. Or maybe they just don't see any benefit to themselves in doing th laundry. Do they also neglect to eat dinner?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  23. I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send me a free sample to ....

  24. Um, er, um, muscles, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do all realize that muscles are not the whole story? You need parallel development of capillaries, veins, ligaments, joints, lungs, and bones.

    If it doesn't do those, you might end up with huge muscles that tear away from their connections the first time you exert them.

    1. Re:Um, er, um, muscles, what? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      You do all realize that muscles are not the whole story? You need parallel development of capillaries, veins, ligaments, joints, lungs, and bones.

      If it doesn't do those, you might end up with huge muscles that tear away from their connections the first time you exert them.

      For the average person, muscles are just there to look good, not actually to climb mountains or run farther.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Um, er, um, muscles, what? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The process is probably slow enough to allow the rest of the body to adapt. After all, when you exercise, you are just releasing other, natural chemicals to initiate the same process. If you can simply control the release of those chemicals consciously, there is no reason that the effect needs to be different than the results of exercise. In fact, you might well be able to build muscle with less risk of injury from exertion.

      I would say the real danger here is that conscious control is not going to be precise and well designed as the body's natural feedback process which might cause chronic issues to appear from uneven development. You could have some of the issues you describe, although I'd expect that they would be significantly less dramatic than muscles ripping themselves apart like that.

      Of course, if people like those abusing steroids get their hands on this and abuse the heck out of it, there could be some very... bad... effects.

  25. Welcome to america... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want an exercise-pill with your supersized menu?

  26. Re:I call bullshit. by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It must be comforting to "know" that a study must be false by virtue of the fact that you disagree with its conclusion.

    Why not? It works for politics.

  27. Drumroll... by JeanCroix · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..And I hear ARod is already being investigated for it.

    1. Re:Drumroll... by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      Investigated? He funded the research!

  28. Gravity pills by steveha · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the problems facing astronauts: long periods of microgravity cause bone and muscle loss. I've read science fiction stories where people had to take pills to maintain their bones and muscles; they called them "gravity pills".

    If this drug really works, I'm wondering if the astronauts in the space station, future Mars missions, etc. might wind up taking it drug routinely.

    Probably a Mars mission will need to have some sort of rotating crew module to produce a gravity-like acceleration, as it will likely require at least seven months for the trip.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Gravity pills by crow · · Score: 1

      I've heard that most of the muscle and bone loss in space has been due to astronauts failing to keep up with exercise programs while in space, so the problem isn't as bad as it is perceived to be. Still, you're probably correct that something like this would still be useful for the space program.

    2. Re:Gravity pills by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      > astronauts failing to keep up with exercise programs

      This is absolutely not true.

    3. Re:Gravity pills by crow · · Score: 1

      I believe this was an extreme case of a cosmonaut on Mir who needed a wheelchair upon return. I'm not saying it isn't a problem, but I am saying that it's often perceived as being a bigger problem than it really is, and we've developed better exercise routines to combat the problem as we've gained more experience.

  29. Unexpected consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this drug works and becomes socially accepted, maybe in a few years Lance Armstrong will get his Tour the France titles back. Gyms will be out of business unless they become libraries.

    1. Re:Unexpected consequences by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Muscles don't give you coordination. I know that from experience. You still need to train to be any good at a sport... even plain old powerlifting. Muscles or not, you lift that weight wrong and you will break something.

      That said, I would much prefer to have to train only for coordination and not have to worry about keeping weight off and building muscle. It's very time consuming to do that.

    2. Re:Unexpected consequences by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      They don't, but they're definitely a part of it. That twitchy muscle strength is what gives you the ability to react quickly. Troy Polamalu, the Steelers player, has a workout routine that's based on fast, "explosive" movements with relatively low weights. I've felt that loss of reactive muscles as I get older and still have a lot of the coordination I had, just not the reactive strength to do things as quickly.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    3. Re:Unexpected consequences by gagol · · Score: 1

      Gyms will be out of business unless they become libraries.

      Ever occured to you not everybody is a lazy couch potato fat ass and may enjoy the exercise?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  30. Drugs are bad mmmkay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that said I can't wait to try it

  31. Re:I call bullshit. by invid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exercise doesn't make you healthy, it's your body's response to exercise that makes you healthy. Of course it can be simulated.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  32. SUPER CRACK by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1
    It be makin' yo ass go real fast! WHOOOO YEAH!

    WOOT my face is so muscular now! O yea bustin' walnuts with my nostrils and shit!

  33. not when you are on the 80 hour work week by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    get back to your desk

  34. Might not work for healthy people by erice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Previous studies on mice lacking Rev-ErbA showed decreased skeletal muscles, metabolic rate, and running capacity. Such mice appeared fated by their genetics to live as couch potatoes.

    When Burris' group administered SR9009 to these mice to activate the Rev-Erb protein, the results were remarkable. The metabolic rate in the skeletal muscles of the mice increased significantly. The treated mice were not allowed to exercise, but despite this they developed the ability to run about 50 percent further before being stopped by exhaustion.

    So they created some broken mice and then treated them with a drug that reversed what they broke. And, what do you know? The effects were reversed too.

    I'd like to see a followup on unmodified mice to see if they also benefit. If Rev-ErbA is already present and active at normal levels, the drug may not do anything.

    1. Re:Might not work for healthy people by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      > I'd like to see a followup on unmodified mice to see if they also benefit

      Bingo!

    2. Re:Might not work for healthy people by Hartree · · Score: 2

      Actually, the Nature paper addresses this. They found that while underexpression of Rev-ErbA weakens muscles, overexpression of it gave the increased benefits over normal.

      Granted, this was in the defective mouse and needs to be followed up with wild type, but it looks like it's not just the replacement.

    3. Re:Might not work for healthy people by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      The same group did a study last year that used unmodified mice (well, largely unmodified- they had been put on a diet that promoted obesity, but they were not transgenic).

      Based on the alterations in energy metabolism and gene expression we observed in normal C57BL6 and Balb/c mice, we sought to examine whether a REV-ERB alpha/beta agonist would be efficacious in a rodent model of obesity. We initiated the study with 20-week old C57BL6 mice (average weight = 41g) that had been maintained on a high fat diet for 14 weeks (20% carbohydrate 60% fat). The mice continued on the HF diet and we initiated twice per day dosing (i.p.) of SR9009. While the stress of handling and twice-daily injections caused weight loss in vehicle-treated controls, weight loss of SR9009-treated animals was 60% greater (Fig. 5a). During the treatment period, there was no significant difference in the food intake of SR9009 and vehicle treated animals, although handling itself reduced food intake explaining the weight loss observed in the controls. SR9009 treated mice exhibited a more severe reduction in adiposity (Fig. 5b). In addition to the decrease in fat mass we also observed a 12% decrease in plasma triglycerides (TGs) and a 47% decrease in plasma total cholesterol (Chol) (Fig. 5c). Plasma non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were also reduced (23%) along with plasma glucose (19%) in the SR9009 treated animals (Fig. 5c). There was also a trend toward a decrease in plasma insulin levels (35%).

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    4. Re:Might not work for healthy people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... it's like most of the non-illegal supplements out there (The amino acid of the week, zinc, etc...): They have real, clinically proven effects in humans that are deficient in them... if you are getting enough from your diet then there is no effect no matter how much you take (and then you get into negative side effects).

      It's like saying that if a bunch of sailors with scurvy had their dental health improved by vitamin C, then regular people will get badass shark teeth from some extra limes in the diet...

  35. sex pills by csumpi · · Score: 2

    All we need now is just a sex pill. Then we can sit on the sofa all day updating our facebook status, while having all our needs satisfied popping pills.

    Go humans!

    1. Re:sex pills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they call that heroin.

    2. Re:sex pills by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      O wonder!
      How many goodly creatures are there here!
      How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world,
      That has such people in't.

      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DI6-bOmxWCA/USLZ40qvbgI/AAAAAAAAABo/-TEKICFu8ik/s1600/WALL-E-humans_320.jpg

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    3. Re:sex pills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. You have the whole internet and a free hand. What the fuck do you need a sex pill for?

  36. That's what I told them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one MUST commute 45 minutes one way, work a ten hour day, commute another 45 minutes

    No, just no.

    Or you value your life very little.

    I've been unemployed for several years now and I DEMAND that I have a 40 hour week - no more. Deadlines missed?!

    Well, your deadline was obviously unreasonable. Missed deadlines are ALWAYS management's fault!

    That's what I said in interviews when I used to get them.

    1. Re:That's what I told them! by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Here's an idea.

      Get a job/profession/career that doesn't have such ridiculous deadlines.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:That's what I told them! by skids · · Score: 1

      Here's an fact: for many it is not trivial to change careers. It is even less trivial to do so without losing your underwater house and going through bankruptcy in the process.

    3. Re:That's what I told them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the roughly 7% of US adults who are still unemployed. "Just get a job! Problem solved!" Why on earth didn't they think of that sooner?

    4. Re:That's what I told them! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I planned it. I didn't do it in one day.

      And I still have my underwater house, that I rent out.

      Never said it was trivial. Just that it was worth it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:That's what I told them! by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Says the guy trying to hammer on me that I made better choices than him.

      You see it as insecure, because you are. I see it as liberation.

      You can suck it. Or just quietly go about your business and stop trying to pull others down.

      I really don't care either way.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:That's what I told them! by bhagwad · · Score: 0

      I really don't care either way.

      Oh, but you do care. You care very much that you're seen as some kind of modern day zen master. Guess what? Real zen masters don't go bragging on forums. You're just a wannabe (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you're not lying in the first place. That's probably more than you deserve, but what can I say? I'm a generous guy!) Moreover, you know nothing about my life choices so your claim that you make "better choices" than me is just further evidence of your crying need to assuage your insecurity.

      If this pill becomes a reality people like you will be extremely unhappy because you lose your chance to show them how morally superior you are. World is full of dudes just like you. Unfortunately for you, everyone sees through it.

    7. Re:That's what I told them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea! Unfortunately, it's just that - an idea. Spewing ideas is the easy part. I've got a million of them. Thanks for doing your part.

    8. Re:That's what I told them! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You are believing the government figures. It's considerably higher than that, though I can't give you reliable figures. My guess would be it's around 20%, but that could be either an over or an under estimate, and I don't know by how much.

      Government unemployment figures have been admitted to be manipulated to give the desired value since around 1980, so it's probably been happening for a lot longer than that. As election time approaches they will often redefine the way that unemployment is calculated so that they can claim that they've reduced unemployment. (They don't go back and recalculate the historical numbers, so you can't know what the figures really mean.)

      You could also look at the way they calculate the money supply. That's another place where they use slippery calculations to make themselves look good to those who care to look at the numbers, with no real way to tie them to anything actual.

      OTOH, AFAIK the census bureau produces honest numbers. Despite those numbers being used to define the boundaries of electoral districts.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:That's what I told them! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If I was like you, I would smugly tell everyone that they should telecommute. That any parent that doesn't get to eat lunch with their child everyday is just not trying.

      The thing is, there are only so many jobs that people can telecommute to. More jobs could be telecommuting than are, but that decision generally isn't the employees to make. Even if every job that could be telecommuting was, there would still be a need for a large percentage of people to work on-site. The fact that you* and I can telecommute is because not everyone else does.

      * I am assuming that you too telecommute given that you can just quit jobs and change careers to get a better work/life balance.

    10. Re:That's what I told them! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Your therapist must be rich.

    11. Re:That's what I told them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I still have my underwater house, that I rent out.

      To a family of beavers?

    12. Re:That's what I told them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if you value your life you should switch from a career/profession that you enjoy but spend very long hours doing, to a job that you don't like but you don't have to work as many hours(though still a substantial portion of the day)?

  37. What could go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Rogers is over 9000.

  38. What could possibly go wrong? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Oh, right...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenfluramine/phentermine

  39. Re:I call bullshit. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    How much you wanna bet it's more about having "cheaters" cutting into the supply of hot ladies he's exercised so hard to get?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  40. Re:Ethyl-3-(((4-chlorobenzyl)((5-nitrothiophen-2-y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROFLMAO. Best. Post. Ever.

  41. Paging Stan Lee? by jcr · · Score: 1

    I swear this sounds just like a Marvel Comics hero origin story...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  42. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Sounds like how I've heard meth described. I've also heard it's awesome for weight loss too.

    Do the mice feel the need to take apart their exercise wheel?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  43. Promising Mice Test != Great New Discovery .. yet by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    It's great they've had promising tests in mice, but journalists always go on to make some fabulous claim for how the future wonder cure/thing is right around the corner.

    Yes, this is interesting, and maybe there is some good science/medicine that will come out of it - but we're FAR down the road from an exercise pill. I know the article isn't saying it's right around the corner either but it just feels like a lot of speculation and hyperbole at this point.

    I know, I know - total Debbie Downer - sorry.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  44. I wonder how many people will just try it/ by ezrec · · Score: 1

    Like anything else, you can just buy it over the internet:

    http://www.millipore.com/catalogue/item/554726-25MG?cid=bios-C-epdf-1032-1302-RC

    1. Re:I wonder how many people will just try it/ by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Like anything else, you can just buy it over the internet:

      http://www.millipore.com/catalogue/item/554726-25MG?cid=bios-C-epdf-1032-1302-RC

      Rather expensive for a useful dose though... To quote from that page (emphasis mine):

      A 7-day administration of SR9009 ( 100 mg/kg , i.p., b.i.d.) causes a significant weight and fat loss in C57BL6 mice with concomitant reduction in plasma glucose and free fatty acid levels, and alters circadian pattern.

      So, 100mg/kg at $149 per 25mg, comes to $596 per kg; or around $350000 for a typical person taking a one week course...

      Obviously, after the research is done, if it's a marketable product, they'll sell it significantly cheaper than this; but at these prices, there's no realistic way for any normal person to buy it in quantities that will have a useful/noticeable effect on them (which is also probably deliberate since they make quite a point of stating it's not intended for use in people).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  45. We are machines that need movement by luiscolorado · · Score: 2

    We are masses of blood and other fluids integrated with a machinery (bones, muscles, cartilage, and other tissues) that was designed to be moving.

    Drugs like that may bring some of the benefits produced by exercise, but ultimately our bodies depend on movement for many functions. For example, bones that are not stressed by exercise become brittle. Cartilage in our spine and joints have no direct blood circulation, but depend on the blood flow of surrounding tissue. Lack of movement deprives cartilage of indirect blood flow.

    I doubt that a single drug can replace all the benefits of moving our bodies.

  46. Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's got time to pop a pill?
    They're probably in a container in the Kitchen or the Bathroom and I just found my comfy spot on the sofa and now my favorite show is on...

  47. Did anybody RTFA? by strangeintp · · Score: 0

    In the first paragraph, it states the drug "increases exercise endurance in animal models". It goes on to say "activation of Rev-erbα with SR9009 led to increased metabolic activity in skeletal muscle in both culture and in mice. The treated mice had a 50 percent increase in running capacity, measured by both time and distance."

    I doubt the implication is that you can sit around on your ass popping these pills and expect to get buff...

    1. Re:Did anybody RTFA? by BreakBad · · Score: 0

      I doubt the implication is that you can sit around on your ass popping these pills and expect to get buff...

      Marketing Department: *lightbulb*

    2. Re:Did anybody RTFA? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Nothing +50% is still nothing.
      Sounds more like the latest greatest thing for the doping market...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  48. Chemicals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A single chemical that can have far-reaching benefits if only we consume it responsibly? No thanks! Salt, iodine, iron, calcium, vitamins, and acetaminophen are for wimps!

    In all seriousness, if the benefits are better than the downsides, sign me up. I've been waiting for something like this, and it will prove invaluable to those interested in space travel.

  49. Anecdotal, I admit by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    How about my screwed up shoulder from weightlifting, that I'm currently undergoing physical therapy for?

    The physical therapist explained that my issue is usually caused by too much repetitive motion with the arms raised.

    So, yes, increased wear and tear.

    You can dismiss my firsthand account as anecdotal if you like, but there's also the inference I make from what the PT told me: "your issue is caused, like in other cases, by too much repetitive motion with the arms raised."

    --PM

    --PeterM

    1. Re:Anecdotal, I admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you. You overtrained, and you did it wrong.

    2. Re:Anecdotal, I admit by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and guess how you figure out "did it right" from "did it wrong". Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
      "Right" varies from person to person, and over time for any given person.
      Stuff I did as a kid would rip tendons now, no telling what it would do to the joints.

  50. Exercise while commuting: cycle by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    You are looking at this all wrong: I have a 45 minute commute and get exercise too by cycling. Edmonton has a fantastic river valley park so not only is about half the cycle ride through parks but the climb out of the valley helps increase the exercise. Of course being in Canada you can only do this 6-7 months of the year but for the winter there are buses so still no need to drive unless I'm working late. Not only does this get you exercise without taking up a lot of time but it's also saves money (bike maintenance is a lot less than the cost of bus fares or petrol).

  51. Longevity of mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be interested to see, if the increased cell production has an effect on damaged tissues (healing), and what effect did the drug long term have on average longevity of the mice. Does it have deeper effects on the aging process.

  52. Should be mandatory for Olympic Games by burni2 · · Score: 1

    U. Bolt - new world record - 100m running 5.19s - and he will be tested and found clean, but 2 years later .. ROLF..

    Please, doping for all and not only the wicked !

  53. Re:Promising Mice Test != Great New Discovery .. y by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    I'd blame it more on the scientists (and their organizations). There are all kinds of self-serving reasons for a lab to convince people they're on the verge of some great breakthrough. I've been hearing about cancer cures 5 years down the road for about 20 years now.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  54. SR9009 and Professional Sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when is SR9009 going to make its way into professional sports? What if one were to exercise + take this drug?

  55. Interesting for other reasons: by Hartree · · Score: 2

    According to the Nature paper referenced, they think part of the way it works is increased creation of working mitochondria, and increased recycling of nonworking mitochondria.

    That's a useful thing to be able to modify. There are a number of diseases that seem to involve increasing mitochondrial disfunction or decreased numbers of them.

    In fact, one of the theories of aging is that the mitochondria stop working so well contributing to senescence because there's less energy for the cell to do routine things like take out the trash (buildup of nonworking protein and other remnants). That's certainly not the whole story on aging, but it's likely a part of it.

    This may not work in humans, or even if it does might not lead to an exercise pill, but this is certainly interesting work.

  56. Lance Armstrong by periledo · · Score: 1

    Once the drug is socially accepted, he should get his Tour de France titles back

  57. Only body affected though?? by John+Allsup · · Score: 2

    Exercise that only tones the muscles isn't the most productive.  Exercises that do this and integrate body and mind (such as a skilled sport or a martial art) do much more, and I doubt these drugs would accomplish any of that.

    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Only body affected though?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biological reasons for this are basically "muscle memory" i.e. having practised the correct technique so much you can do it without really thinking about it, and nervous system activation which is the ability to send a strong well-distributed impulse that recruits more fibres. This is a big part of martial arts - people like Bruce Lee and Gordon Liu didn't have that much muscle mass compared to even an amateur bodybuilder, but did have superb conditioning and the ability to deploy all their power explosively as part of a coordinated and stabilised kinetic chain.

      Muscle mass and size generally still matters quite a lot though, Bruce freely admitted in an interview that if he and Chuck Norris had fought for real as opposed to the staged fight in Way of the Dragon he would have lost.

  58. Big Pharma = Big Conspiracy Theory by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    The belief that thousands of people working for a dozen different companies all work together in secret to destroy our health. That no pharmaceutical company will try to make a fortune selling a cure because they like selling treatments.

    You know I'll just drop this https://xkcd.com/808

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  59. The final frontier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why there are so few fat people on Picard's Enterprise despite the fact that there are food replicators everywhere. Seems like this will be a popular medicine in the 24th century.

  60. Another diet pill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when diet pills were the fad in the 90s, then we realized they caused psychological and physical damage to the brain. Do we really need to go down this road again?

  61. Did anyone actually bother to read the article? by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    This post is almost entirely inaccurate. From the article: "An international group of scientists has shown that a drug candidate designed by scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) significantly increases exercise endurance in animal models..." So the article is actually stating that it will increase an individuals endurance in order to allow people who normally can not perform exercise, to exercise (i.e. someone with an injury or someone who is overweight.)

    1. Re:Did anyone actually bother to read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried. But I got tired too soon.

    2. Re:Did anyone actually bother to read the article? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      But what do you think exercise endurance is?

  62. SR9009? I have the perfect marketing slogan... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    It's over 9000!

  63. NASA take note by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    This might help astronauts who lose muscle tone with extended time being weightless

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  64. Re:contraindications by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Considering the side effects that people are okay with these days, a whole lot of people will have to die pretty horribly to keep this from dominating the market.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  65. Bad idea by PPH · · Score: 1

    develop larger muscles

    What about the associated connective tissue? Building big muscles fast is just a recipe for tearing ligaments. These take a lot longer to develop than muscle. As many steroid users demonstrate by bulking up fast and then tearing themselves up pushing too hard.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  66. So I can just take a drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will I have to pick it up at a pharmacy or store? I'll probably have to pay for it too, I suppose.

    Yeah. That sounds like it's going to be a lot of work. I think I'll pass.

  67. Re:I call bullshit. by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot. There is no get, especially with "hot ladies". Your argument is invalid.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  68. Space? by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

    Would this be useful for people who need to spend prolonged periods in low-g environments? What about people in comas? It seems like this might have a lot of uses beyond just making lazy people look better. Although, I wholeheartedly endorse that plan too.

  69. OT WARNING by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Thanks for sharing that, my brother is 4 years older than me too & in many ways leads a much more difficult life than I do, so it hit kinda close to home. He is actually a good example of someone who can't simply quit and move, even though he would surely be better off financially if he was to do so. He its the eldest and of the old school of this meaning he is responsible for caring for his elders & won't move until those he feels responsibility for have passed. There are so many different circumstances that it is naive to believe one person's experiences can be applied to another's.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  70. I can haz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been heavy all my life, which means that the benefits of exercising don't seem as tangible as the pain and changing of habits required. (AKA: I'm lazy and don't have a goal that seems tangible enough to motivate me).

    This would cut out the starter work, and even if it didn't give me rock hard abs as long as it get's me out of the certified obese range (which is bullshit I just have big bones), then it may make the goal of being toned tangible enough to motivate me to change my lifestyle.

    Or I can just continue to pray that someday soon a magical fairly comes and takes away nearly all of my fat.

  71. side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they keep that drug under control until they are really (I mean REALLY) sure it doesn't make people shy of light and awakes a sudden desire for eating brains.

  72. Fatkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, all of these posts and nobody mentions the Fatkins treatment from Cory Doctorow's Makers?

  73. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The human experience is essentially one of self improvement, spiritual, intellectual, physical, emotional et al. We should have complete freedom to enhance ourselves. It should be a human right to do so. Bring on the meds if they work. also IF1 modification treatments and any other human enhancement tech out there.

  74. Mickey Mouse life extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over time medical science has done miracles for mice health!

  75. Good & Bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can agree that this would have benefits to people who need physical therapy or some other area. But I don't think they should try to market this as a solution to obesity. You know if it was sold like that it would be only for money without any reason to really be helpful to people. I would be willing to bet that this drug would cause people to be even lazier. Why take care of yourself when there's pills that fix you? What's the long term effects of not working out but making your body think it actually worked out for years and years?

  76. Space travel by Nimless · · Score: 1

    It might be useful for space travel: one of the problems of a zero gravity environment is muscle atrophy and this drug could maybe solve that.

  77. Hot water by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Drink hot water whenever possible.

  78. Oh no, a new class of controlled substances by cundare · · Score: 1

    C'mon, you know how this will play out. Not just anybody will be allowed access. What's the difference between a drug that increases your muscle mass without exercise (i.e., the andros & other steroids) and one that increases your aerobic capability? If it actually does work, it'll first be banned by all sports organizations, amateur and professional, and then, like steroids, legally classified as a controlled substance and regulated as tightly as methadone. A result of our Puritan background -- if you don't earn something, you don't deserve it. You know I'm right: Even here, what was the first /. response? "People should just go out and walk instead of taking a drug."

  79. Can you say "Thalidomide" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from the Thalidomide Generation, I don't really trust any kind of compound that is created to ''mimic'' anything. I hate to exercise just the same as many people, and I love the outdoors and spend as much time in the field as I can. Nevertheless, any drug that claims to be a shortcut to anything at all will most likely end up killing you in the long run. There again, just about anything a person consumes these days is classified as a killer in one way or another.

  80. It works great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My next door neighbor, who's pregnant, was told by her doctor that her pregnancy-induced diabetes required medication.

    She went to another doctor, because, you know, second opinion and all that. He reluctantly agreed with her when she insisted on another alternative, you know, other than being a drugged pawn of the big pharmas.

    So now she goes for a walk every day. She's not diabetic now.

    So yeah, be snarky and get a +5, but the fact remains. You can buy into a line of BS, or you can just go for a walk.

    But if you did THAT, you wouldn't be a big fat asshole getting +5's on /. You'd be a nobody. Oh, wait...

  81. Apart from giving lazy people a bigger incentive by stacycakes · · Score: 1

    to do absolutely nothing in terms of physical exercise *rolls eyes*...... the other beneficial possibilities of this drug seem to be well worth the effort of further testing and sampling.

  82. more importantly, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is organ size enhanced?

  83. Performance Enhancing Drugs by billd10 · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a lot of the drugs that have been banned by various sports organizations. Maybe it's addictive....