Slashdot Mirror


How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work

jfruh writes "A lot of ink has been spilled explaining to Boomers and Gen Xers how they can best manage, motivate, and retain talented members of the Millenial generation on the job. But it's a two-way street, and those born in the '80s and later could also use a lesson on how to best communicate with older co-workers, who after all will determine their promotion and pay raises for the foreseeable future. Advice includes: make actual phone calls, mirror the level of formality your co-workers use in e-mails, and for Pete's sake don't ask them things like 'R U going?' in a non-texting medium."

298 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. Hey grandpa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Howz it shakin?

    1. Re:Hey grandpa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Long, loose, and ready for use. Now suck it, boy.

    2. Re:Hey grandpa! by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Hey grandpa! by thinkingrodent · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean short and to the left?

    4. Re:Hey grandpa! by dicobalt · · Score: 1

      lolz u old

    5. Re:Hey grandpa! by xaxa · · Score: 2

      lolz u old

      I got an email from one of the sysadmins today, he'd written "2morow". Checking the mail headers showed it was written in Thunderbird This makes him old: younger people wouldn't have become so used to text-speak, they had smart(er)phones too early.

    6. Re:Hey grandpa! by andreas.hummelbrunne · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the PowerCord for the CRT. You can clearly see the Port.

    7. Re:Hey grandpa! by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Writing email in Thunderbird doesn't necessarily make somebody old. It could be a workplace where that program is a corporate standard, and sysadmins do the kind of Serious Work (TM) where you need an actual computer rather than a phone or tablet.

      So far as I've been able to tell, young people still use textspeak on their smartphones. It has become part of the culture in SMS, IM, and Twitter. Email isn't the place for it, though, especially if you're not sending the email from a phone.

    8. Re:Hey grandpa! by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbird (unofficially, but not that unusually). It simply shows he had a keyboard when he typed the message.

      Looking through my sent and received text messages, I abbreviate groups of words (LMK, TTYL) but not individual words. Most of my friends do the same. Most are between 24-29. I don't really know anyone under 20.

      It would be interesting to know if 13 year olds still write things like "l8r" or "2mrw". That's generally harder to type than the full word.

  2. as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    as possible.

    1. Re:as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a millennial, I offer this advice: don't fucking have anime as your desktop wallpaper, don't have an interest in Pokemon or Yu-Gi-Oh. If you're older than 12 and still playing with that shit, your coworkers will think you're a wimpy bitch as best and a creepy pedophile at worst. Seriously, guys, we're grown men here.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    2. Re:as loudly by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The hell do folks' personal gaming interest have to do with their professional life?

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    3. Re:as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Grown men who play with children's toys are creepy. An occasional animated show is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.

    4. Re:as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Grown men who play with children's toys are creepy.

      You almost have a point there. I mean, the average age of game players is 30 years old, so by that definition, if you're a gamer, you're creepy.

      An occasional animated show is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.

      An occasional football/baseball/basketball/foosball game is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      An occasional movie is fine; is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      An occasional book is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      An occasional opera is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      Eating the occasional meal is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      An occasional comic book is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      Collecting the occasional stamp is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.
      Playing the occasional guitar is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.

      Anything is weird if you take it to some crazy extreme. Who are you to be the gatekeeper of what hobbies are weird and which ones aren't, based on some arbitrary scale of weirdness?

    5. Re:as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You sound like like an ass kissing yes-man. This post sounds like an overcompensation for serious esteem issues, I suppose your behavior does get you some small level of head patting from your betters, but we still all recognize you as a worthless lickspittle. It's not like your kind is rare you know. We know how you treat people when we're not around to keep you on your leash. Consider this your warning.

      Yes, I'm significantly older than you and am definitely at the top of your food chain, You would do well to grow up and develop a better attitude. You don't sound like you were raised very well, probably because your father was from a long line of lickspittles and he passed on his craven "values" to you.

      Comically, the captcha is "achieve". Something you will never do,

    6. Re:as loudly by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, in case you puerile dorks haven't yet figured this out - In the corporate world, the world in which I work(so I know a few things), perception is very important, especially because chances are your boss is an older geezer than you are who was raised properly with manners.

      When you get hired, you embrace the corporate culture. I know that sounds a lot for you social-retards to handle, as you're the ones playing music loudly on your phone in public and performing other obnoxious habits. Chances are, you think the real world is like the movie The Social Network and your parents didn't instill any discipline in you and let you do whatever the fuck you wanted to do in public. You were the kid whose parents let him run around the restaurant and randomly kick other diners in the shins, and then your yuppie-asshole dad explained it all away by telling angry partrons some dumb shit like, "he's just exploring."

      If somebody has Anime on their desktop or plays Pokemon without shame, it means that chances are they are one of those compulsively nose-wiping snots I described above. I am a millenial, albeit an older one, but I understand those things because I was properly raised. When I was a kid, anybody who was playing with action figures in the fifth grade was laughed at, because by then cool kids like me were listening to Kriss-Kross and going to dances with girls. Get with it, kids.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

      So ad-hominems, jumping to conclusions, unjustified judgmental attitude, heavy reliance on strawmen . . . I don't think you're nearly as mature as you think you are. Unless you don't count maturity and rationality in the list of proper raising and development.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    7. Re:as loudly by xaxa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The hell do folks' personal gaming interest have to do with their professional life?

      Once they put it on their work computer's desktop it gets noticed.

      One of my colleagues has a screengrab from a film; a huge gun against someone's head. I didn't much like seeing that. I'm not going to complain about it, but I think it's a bit disrespectful and immature.

      An anime/manga background isn't disrespectful (hopefully!), but think about what impression you want to give to colleagues beforehand. That's all.

    8. Re:as loudly by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      What exactly did his desktop background disrespect? Why does it concern you? it's his desktop background, not yours.

    9. Re:as loudly by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      He is right about one thing, they should not be on your WORKPLACE desktop.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    10. Re:as loudly by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah yes, holier than thou rhetoric. Perhaps corporate culture should focus more on results and not perception and appearance? You might make more money that way.

      When I get hired, I enter into an agreement to do a specific set of tasks in order to receive a specific amount of money. If the work gets done correctly, in a timely fashion, I get paid. Otherwise, I don't and am fired. I have embraced nothing. This is the difference between an employee and a slave. A slave is forced to embrace the cultural whims of his master in order to gain a pittance for living expenses..if he's lucky.

      If corporate culture routinely uses unsubstantiated opinions of minor traits to differentiate potential employees, I am not surprised our economy is in the shitter. How can such irrational people make good products and thus any money if the only skill they have and prize in new hires is social favoritism and conformity?

    11. Re: as loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Small nit, but it's the companies desktop.

    12. Re:as loudly by xaxa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exactly did his desktop background disrespect? Why does it concern you? it's his desktop background, not yours.

      Disliking portrayals of violence isn't uncommon, and it concerned me because I sometimes have to see it when I work with him.

      There is obviously a scale. The plain, default blue background at one end, and something like pornography / gore at the other. In a normal office the violent film clip isn't far over my boundary line, but at a school it would be. At school, something gothic with skeletons is just a bit odd, but I'd choose something else at the hospital.

      Essentially, I'm judging someone else by comparing their behaviour to mine.

    13. Re:as loudly by shentino · · Score: 1

      Just more of the same "don't piss off or irk someone who has the power to kick you out of the job"

    14. Re:as loudly by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      the original 3 generations of pokemon

      What the fuck are you talking about? 151 and full stop.

    15. Re:as loudly by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Meh, I'm 54 and have a Marvin the Martian clock in the kitchen.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    16. Re:as loudly by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      You seem to enjoy ridiculing and stereotyping others, to a boomer like me that doesn't equate to someone who was "raised properly with manners". Speaking as a 50-something greybeard, there's only one sure fire way to consistently impress ALL greybeards, do what "Radar O'Riely" did in the show M.A.S.H, give him what he wants just before he asks for it. If you can do that you can come to work in a gorilla suit for all I care.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:as loudly by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm 34, I just got back into IT admin for a small city out in Alberta, and I post whatever I feel like to make my work space relevant, relaxing and rewarding to me. Strange that people come up and ask me what *insert anime/magna* is, and what it's like. Or *insert non-popculture reference* is, or *insert game poster*. I'm not a social person by any means, but these broke the ice very well with not only the people I work with every day, but the city councilors, CFO and CAO. The CFO who's 48 and was a hardcore gamer as well, but felt awkward in approaching anyone younger to see if they wanted to game with him.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    18. Re:as loudly by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Nevertheless, if your company's culture is despicably drama ridden, status driven, and passive aggressive, you will not retain the best talent. You're right, the owner can do what he wants, but he has to live with the consequences of his choices just like everyone else.

    19. Re:as loudly by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

      I used to make badly written programs as a kid, so does this mean I have to quit my job?

      My boss said he would give me a glowing referral for any one of our competitors. He's a pretty cool guy.

      -Gen Y v86 signing off

    20. Re:as loudly by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The hell do folks' personal gaming interest have to do with their professional life?

      One of my developer co-workers doesn't like anybody working for him to be a gamer. I think that he likes for people to be researching new tools and whatnot in their offtime and not playing games. Of course, everybody in his group plays games pretty avidly, but that is because you pretty much can't find anybody that doesn't play games these days. Everybody that we interview is really wanting to get a job at a big gaming software shop. Luckily for them they got hired on with us, because I'd love for them to be able to maintain the illusion that a gaming shop is a good place to work.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    21. Re:as loudly by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      When I get hired, I enter into an agreement to do a specific set of tasks in order to receive a specific amount of money. If the work gets done correctly, in a timely fashion, I get paid. Otherwise, I don't and am fired. I have embraced nothing.
      Well, that is fine, if you just want to be a good little wage earner, do your job and go home. But if you want to have any hopes of advancement, then you should consider that the company will be looking for people who are able to represent the company's interests either to their customers or to people that they want you to lead.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    22. Re:as loudly by Artea · · Score: 1

      And if you don't pick charmander, you're a wimp.

    23. Re:as loudly by anubi · · Score: 1

      As a member of the older set, I will relate an experience I had at Starbucks Coffee a few days ago. I'll state what happened, my take on it, and run it up the flagpole.

      It was a hot Sunday afternoon a week ago. Its usually very crowded at that Starbucks during those hours, and sometimes one cannot find seating. This time, what little seating and tables there were are all bundled together, with little table-tents marked "reserved" on them, but no-one is there. There is nowhere to sit, so I pass on the coffee and walk onto the mall and get some coffee at the Tea Leaf. I putter around the mall for a while then walk back, noticing a bunch of young preppy Starbucks executive types yapping while the baristas all were at rapt attention. They took away the customer seating for this. On one of the busiest days of the summer.

      I have been going to that Starbucks for quite some time. I have always ordered the same thing - a coffee frappucino with chips and sugar-free vanilla sweetener. $4.75. Now the barista tells me she has to charge me an additional 50 cents for sweetener. I feel I am already way overpaying for coffee, but I did like the social environment of Starbucks, and my baristas always seemed to care a lot that they made my coffee just right - but I felt worse than useless to those executive types - as far as I could see, I was nothing more than some nameless, faceless, wallet-carrier that was there to be fleeced as far as possible. I figured they saw Starbucks Coffee Corporation as nothing more than opportunities for career advancement, retirement plans, shared profit plans, health-care, whatever, with the customer ( me ) being expected to simply absorb whatever they dish out. Just to pay the salary of ONE of those handshaking suit-guys, 200,000 of us are going to have to be charged an extra fifty cents for a squirt of sweetener. On top of that, even more baristas will have to demand an extra 50 cents for sweetener to pay for hotel bills, per-diem, airfare, and whatever for the suit-guy in addition to telling the useless customer that there isn't any seating for them.

      If I ran Starbucks, I would call the guy who hired those preppy suit-guys to justify his own salary and retention. First, I would demote him to barista, and have him ask each customer for an extra fifty cents for sweetener. And keep him at it until he has justified his former salary out of the pockets of his customers. If he loses his customers, have him do whatever it takes to recruit more customers. At his OWN expense.

      Its been my experience that those who built the company up realize the importance of a loyal customer base. The new execs hired into the company with business-school educations seem to completely lack common-sense when dealing with old people who have been loyal to the company as a result of hard work by the baristas who saw customer satisfaction as the key to a successful business.

      To a young growing company, they need the customer. To some older established companies, the executives seem to see the customer as just a pain in the ass.

      I think the baristas are doing great. However I feel I am nothing more than a mark as far as the Executive class is concerned...

      We get these business execs who are able to calculate the price of everything, but do not seem to know the worth of anything.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    24. Re:as loudly by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Hence the point - it's a distraction that people see as unprofessional. It's not playing WoW in meetings but it pushes the same annoyance buttons that it may as well be for some people.

    25. Re:as loudly by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So ad-hominems, jumping to conclusions, unjustified judgmental attitude

      Haven't you got it yet - all you've listed there are perfectly logical responses to stuff seen as weird in the workplace because of the buttons it pushes in people's heads. They are unjust responses but they do happen alright. People are less likely to take you seriously if they think you look like a clown, that's just human nature. Other people draw connections from one thing to another and would probably go as far as calling the police if they see somebody with a Strike Witches wallpaper.

    26. Re:as loudly by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If the place gets big enough pockets of all that will arise. Some idiot always wants to be an alpha gorilla.

    27. Re:as loudly by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a shitty work environment. I'd hate to work where you work, or with a guy like you.

      My company looks after me. Really. I feel motivated to give more than I am contractually obliged to back. The people I work with are my friends. I've work in places where this isn't the case and they suck.

      I'm not a machine, I'm a human being damnit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:as loudly by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The hell do folks' personal gaming interest have to do with their professional life?

      Because, as the song says, "high school never ends" and "all that matters is climbing up that social ladder".

      Work is basically a LARP where you play a role to get the gold. You might not actually be a lvl 1 Office Drone, but you damn well better learn to pretend. And it makes sense, from viewpoint of efficiency: no one there knows you, at least not initially, but they know what to expect from an Office Drone.

      Life is pretty surreal most of the time. Don't get upset about it, just enjoy the implicit comedy.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    29. Re:as loudly by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      What about ponies?

    30. Re:as loudly by ultranova · · Score: 4, Funny

      Grown men who play with children's toys are creepy. An occasional animated show is fine; making it the center of your life is weird.

      The good thing about being a "grown man" is that you can make anything you want the center of your life without caring whether someone else thinks its weird, creepy or just plain nuts.

      So gaze upon my cute puppy wallpaper and despair.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:as loudly by Holladon · · Score: 1

      I read the comment as having less to do with gaming generally and more to do with Pokemon specifically. There's a pretty hard-line age cut-off for Pokemon stuff, and there are even Gen Yers/Millenials who view Pokemon as purely "kid's stuff." Depending on how Gen Y/Millenials are defined, I'm considered just this side of Gen Y (born in 81) -- but even if I'm technically a year too old (I mean, who sets these cutoffs? I tell you what, it's weird being "between" generations -- I'm definitely not Gen X), what I'm about to express is a sentiment felt equally by my husband (born 1982) and my brother (born 1983), who I think are both considered solidly "Gen Y" by every definition I've seen.

      When Pokemon first became a "thing" in the US, I was finished with high school and getting ready for college (and even if I'd still been in high school, how many high school seniors do you know who pick up a new kids' game for the first time? Bet you the high schoolers you know who are into Pokemon have been into it since they were in elementary school). Pokemon was a kids' cartoon. I was not about to turn right around from walking into adulthood just to go play a kids' game. Pokemon was something for my ten-year-old cousins to futz around with when they've finished watching all their Power Rangers DVDs. It was *not* something older kids/young adults (like I wanted to think of myself as) played with.

      It's a bias, yeah, but it's one I've found to be unusually pervasive. Pretty much everyone I know around late twenties-ish and up just plain doesn't "get" Pokemon and doesn't understand why their mid-twenties friends are so into a kids' game. Whereas, of course, everyone I know under 28 talks about it in the same breath as they'd talk about GTA. If you're on the younger side of this divide, I don't know how to explain to you the feeling of pure *weirdness* this creates for me as a lifelong gamer. I will say that any time I see someone with a clear affinity for Pokemon, all it does it remind me how old I am, and I do *not* like being made to feel old.

    32. Re:as loudly by kyjellyfish · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, get the hell off of my lawn!!!

    33. Re:as loudly by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Essentially, I'm judging someone else by comparing their behaviour to mine.

      Enough said

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    34. Re:as loudly by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      As a millennial, I offer this advice: don't fucking have anime as your desktop wallpaper, don't have an interest in Pokemon or Yu-Gi-Oh. If you're older than 12 and still playing with that shit, your coworkers will think you're a wimpy bitch as best and a creepy pedophile at worst. Seriously, guys, we're grown men here.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

      You could certainly do worse than anime. For instance, you could be a brony.

    35. Re:as loudly by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      If you're older than 12 and still playing with that shit

      Seriously, guys, we're grown men here.

      http://www.theonion.com/articles/man-who-enjoys-thing-informed-he-is-wrong,7057/

    36. Re:as loudly by rhalstead · · Score: 1

      And anime, like movies or any entertainment plays to children, college kids and adults. It covers fairy tales to porn. I much prefer some of it to the drivel on broadcast television

    37. Re:as loudly by rhalstead · · Score: 1

      You can tell the men from the boys by the price of their toys.

    38. Re:as loudly by rhalstead · · Score: 1

      Being an adult means you consider others opinions. Tis children and usually spoiled ones at that who don't care what others think. That does not mean you have to live your life as others wish.

  3. Not concerned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was born in late 1979, I'm not part of generation Y so I don't need to follow such advice. I'm happy not having born a few months later.

    1. Re:Not concerned by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      I was born in late 1979, I'm not part of generation Y so I don't need to follow such advice. I'm happy not having born a few months later.

      I was born in mid-1979 and feel the same tug. Watching the c/o 1996 enter college and then watching the next 4++++ years of incoming freshmen, I saw the cultural shift first-hand. We truly were the last before the big change hit.

      We may only be borderline Gen-X, but we're certainly not Gen-Y...

    2. Re:Not concerned by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was born in 1959 and this article is shit.

      Use the phone

      Fuck no. Use email for work - we want a trace for fucks sake.

      Return email etiquette: When you receive an email from a Baby Boomer, reply using a similar format. If they begin with “Hi Joe” in every email, then you return every email with “Hello Eric”. If they end every email with a letter-like ending such as “Best wishes”, “Best”, “Thanks”, or another equivalent, return your emails with the same courtesy.

      Oh fuck, I bet this guy top-posts.

      Discuss technology at an appropriate level: As you read this, note that it’s coming from a life-long techie, former CIO and current CTO of a company I started. It’s easy for Gen X’ers and Gen Y’ers that grew up using technology to technically overpower those who did not grow up on technology. We are digital immigrants and you are digital natives. There is a difference.

      WTF? People older than me invented all this shit! I don't have to be worried abot some kid blinding me with anything other than bullshit.

      Work hard: Baby Boomers have an extremely strong work ethic.

      Is this guy delusional? Work to live, don't live to work.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:Not concerned by DoctorChestburster79 · · Score: 1

      Summer of '78 here, and my younger sister is Spring of '80. We both also wonder how things got to where they did. For her, she was very good at a position she had been in for the better part of a year, and had even gotten accolades at the company holiday party because of her skills and work ethic.

      Of course, the following Monday, her superior fired her because she felt my sister was a threat. Difference is my sister didn't whine about it, she just picked up and kept moving.

      For me, I've had a habit of getting into situations where I do show some level of ability, but the problem is all of the political crap I have to go through being a major turn-off. That's gotten me in trouble on a few occasions.

    4. Re:Not concerned by hedwards · · Score: 2

      I think it was probably always like that, it's just that people didn't gripe about it.

      Personally, I was born during the last bit of the Carter administration in 1980, and it irritates me to be retroactively moved to a generation that has little in common with me. I may be marginally Gen-X, but none of my friends had cell phones in high school, a few of them had beepers. And most of the kids I went to class with didn't have the internet at home.

      Not that I have anything against Gen-Y or the millenials, but realistically, I was born when all 5 Beatles were still alive and there was some question that I might require a smallpox vaccination.

    5. Re:Not concerned by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's always rich when they use "extremely strong work ethic" to explain away the advantages that came to living in the post war years. As if we wouldn't work hard too if we had at least some reasonable prospect of retiring or getting a holiday bonus. We'd be incredibly rich working hard, if we were competing against the 3rd world and a bunch of bombed out 1st and 2nd world nations as well.

      Or the fact that they could work a summer job and pay for their college education, assuming they chose to get one in the first place. As recently as the '80s, the government was paying 90% of the cost of attending a public school. Not to mention that they shipped most of the jobs that didn't require a college degree overseas or had so many applicants that a B.A. became a standard screening filter for even the most menial jobs.

    6. Re:Not concerned by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who is this "they" that shipped the jobs overseas. The unemployed older workers deemed too old to "fit" into what companies have become?

      The biggest problem there wasn't generational, it was cultural in a perverted sense. MBAitis took over the corporate suite. Simultaneously, open trade was also promoted by the government through trade agreements, mind you the economy would have stagnated without it. The result though was that jobs moved to the least cost producer...that is if you counted cost like yer basic dickless MBA, i.e., cost is the means of production NOW. It didn't account for experience, the ability of the company to be a company 5 years from now, happy workers willing to go above and beyond the call because the company was willing to go above and beyond the call, etc.

      In short, MBAitis means getting yours now because you are more important than any cogs in the wheel, your company means nothing to you because you'll find another, your company's product means nothing to you, pride of workmanship means nothing to you, you are merely a cost-benefit analysis abstracted into a shell of a person with a depth of near nothing.

      After working with youngins and oldins for nearly 40 years, there isn't a generational problem (in general), but there is a management problem.

    7. Re:Not concerned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Maximize shareholder value" was crap when I learned it in business school in the early 1980's, and it's crap now. It dismisses two of the corporation's three constituencies (customers and employees) and focuses solely on one (the shareholder). It forces decision making to be short term (oh, yes, with the help of "net present value" calculations that bias everything toward today's profits over everything else). And the results are predictable.

      That said, phones, email, and IM's all have their place. The people who bug me are the ones who type long (really long) emails and expect people to read every word. Sorry, TLDR.

    8. Re:Not concerned by real-modo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whatever you like - but if you wanted promotion by a boss in that generation . . .

      Promotion?

      That would imply not being laid off as soon as the chief executive's bonus isn't as big is it wanted.

      That would imply being permanently employed, rather than a zero-hours temp who is motiviated to work by the "promise" of a permanent job.

      It would also imply that the old farts are retiring, so people can move up.

      Take a look at what's happening to employment-population ratios by age group. Employment of the over 60s is skyrocketing (i.e.: they're not retiring), the 50-plus group is holding its own, and as for the twenty- and thirty-somethings... it's not a happy story.

      Promotion? Delusion. Promotion happens by getting a job somewhere else, if at all.

    9. Re:Not concerned by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      “Our youth now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise; they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they contradict their parents, chatter before company; gobble up their food and tyrannize their teachers.”

        Socrates

    10. Re:Not concerned by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but most of the regulatory changes happened during the '80s and early '90s. A period during which the young folks didn't have a say.

      If folks your age were too stupid to realize that free trade agreements were a bad idea or that the government has to actually tax people in order to pay for services, that's not really our fault. You guys will get to retire with most of the Social Security you were promised. And chances are substantially better that you'll have some sort of pension to go with it.

      These days, pensions are rare, I can't remember the last time I even saw a job posting that even promised something more than a 401k match.

      The whole, I got mine, now to hell with you attitude of older voters has done an incredible amount of damage to the ability of the young folks to make a decent living. We work harder than you folks did for less. And we get less and less each year as inflation continually outpaces wage improvements. And folks on social security get COLA even when the inflation is negative.

    11. Re:Not concerned by hedwards · · Score: 2

      The problem with maximizing shareholder value is that it's typically done in such a superficial way. It's usually done based purely on market cap and share price. Which is to say, it rewards executives that can con a lot of people and punishes those that actually invest in the future of the company more than 6 months out.

      Theoretically maximizing shareholder value should require focus on the other constituencies as well. It's just that dividend policies tend to not reward people for holding onto share for the long haul. And most investors don't hold onto their holdings long enough to get taxed as a capital gain rather than as ordinary income.

    12. Re:Not concerned by Seumas · · Score: 2

      The thing is, none of the advice offered really means anything. It's all common fucking sense. If you have made it through some formal education system and entered the professional world, you sure as fuck better comprehend and understand these basic common sense things or you're going to fail. I mean, this is not rocket science. Understanding to write and communicate like a professional and to work hard and to stop being self-absorbed whiny social-networking bitches and get down to doing actual work is not on par with, say, learning how to conduct business with Japanese companies or something else, where there is an actual cultural difference that stretches well-beyond the common sense of one society or another.

      I know plenty of people in their 20s who understand this. I know people in their late teens that understand this. If you're in either of those age groups and you don't "get it", then the right thing for you to do is go flip burgers and let these other young people take the jobs you were just going to be a warm-body in.

    13. Re:Not concerned by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're old enough to be my dad, but I agree - I hate using the phone. For several reasons. The first is that in a highly technical environment, it is easier to follow along in an email. It is more precise. Second, in the technical world, you may have to deal with people who have very strong accents more than half of your time. I know it is a personal failure, but I have a very difficult time with exceedingly heavy accents of all kinds. Not to mention, a long of the clients I work with are in departments overseas, so I am trying to decipher what is being said through both a very heavy accent *and* an awful phone connection.

      As for the email stuff... "mimic the other person's behavior" has less to do with "how to deal with the elderly people at least 30 or years old" and more to do with "how to be a slick salesman snake type person" or "how to be a sociopath". People care more about the content and efficacy of your email than fucking salutations (though, for fuck's sake, can we get back to inline quoting and commenting?!).

      Most importantly of all is that Gen x/y are not "digital natives". This is an idiotic parroted line of bullshit that needs to die. This is no different than idiots who talk about how technologically inclined children are, because they can use an iPad by the age of three. Simply watching netflix on ten different devices doesn't make you a technological-fucking-anything. This goes not just for five year olds today, but also millennials, gen x/y and baby boomers. There are highly technical people in all groups (the most used elements of today's technology was developed by the oldest among us -- many so old that they're not even alive any more!) and highly ignorant people in all of the groups. I mean, shit, I know far more gen x'ers and gen y'ers who don't know a lick of code, couldn't build their own computer, couldn't avoid a virus on their machine for the life of them . . . than I know who *can* do those things.

      Of course, I guess I'm not part of this discussion, anyway, because I was born in 1977 -- so I am too old for GEN Y (1980+) and too young for GEN X (up to 1975).

    14. Re:Not concerned by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone in their thirties, my advice to those in their twenties would be to put the fucking phone down, log out of facebook, and try doing some work. It goes a fuck of a long way toward, you know, staying fucking employed.

    15. Re:Not concerned by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that they shipped most of the jobs that didn't require a college degree overseas

      Actually, most of those day-to-day jobs were replaced by automation--word processors, calendar scheduling software, email, voicemail, billing systems, electronic payments, and so on. Not a lot of call these days for people to open mail, move papers around, and file everything when it's done.

      I remember reading about how this was going to happen in the '70s, and doing it first hand in the '80s with temp jobs like setting up word processors to print mailing lists in an hour--something that used to take a secretary a month to type.

      Sure, it's easy to blame India or China for the loss of many good, basic jobs, but most of the blame is right there on your desktop computer.

    16. Re:Not concerned by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      “Our youth now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise; they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they contradict their parents, chatter before company; gobble up their food and tyrannize their teachers.”

        Socrates

      Indeed. I find most generation vs generation complaints are some combination of "This isn't what I'm used to" and selective memory.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    17. Re:Not concerned by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Oh fuck, I bet this guy top-posts."

      I agree with most of what you said, but this is just absurd. Top posting was made popular by a young douchebad named Bill Gates. Experienced people know how to properly e-mail. Today's children don't even know it is called top posting, because they don't know it can be done any other way. But my Microsofts does it like this! It must be right!. That being said, I agree with your sentiment. Top posting is the stupidest fucking approach to email I have ever seen, and is popular only because Gates had to do everything bass ackwards, from top posting to using a \ rather than a / to separate directories (not folders) and filenames (which I'm surprised he didn't start callingl "papers".)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    18. Re:Not concerned by Phrogman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The whole generation thing is BS anyways. I was born in 1959. I don't fit that generation or the one after it very well at all. I like computers, am quite computer literate, I play computer games (mostly MMOs), I read SF and Fantasy. I have a smart phone, I use the web in a variety of ways on a daily basis.
      I get very tired of being lumped into a generation that somehow doesn't get it or something just because of my age.

      Now, I don't sk8, I don't use text speech abbreviations, I can usually spell, I have owned various game systems but got rid of them because I don't like playing them as much as computer games, but I get tired of being treated like I am from the Middle Ages too :P

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    19. Re:Not concerned by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I spent last summer hanging out with a woman that had just graduated college. I have never felt so old in all my life. It seemed like most of the cultural references I was using, elicited a blank stare.

    20. Re:Not concerned by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Truman administration baby here (you know, the guy who dropped those big bombs). You're lucky in not having had to look for work during the Carter administration.

    21. Re:Not concerned by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yes, maximizing shareholder value is certainly something that should have a timeframe attached to it. I mean maximizing shareholder value NOW is almost certainly going to be disastrous to shareholder value in 10 years. Maximizing shareholder value can easily be done by firing all the people that wrote your product, selling all your manufacturing facilities and selling all your existing product on the shelf. However, with not developers or manufacturing facilities, your hopes of even being in business in a year are zero. If I am going to invest in a company, I want one that is constantly investing in research and developing new products. This means that instead of a steady 1.5% growth per quarter, they may be flat or lose stock value for years, and then have a huge jump in value. Of course, a properly run company that is ALWAYS doing research also should be relatively consistently having some of their research pay off. It just can't be determined whether the payoff will come this quarter or next, or the next.
      Today's clever MBAs seem to think that a bird in the hand is worth a hundred in the bush. They won't take any risks, they won't do any research, they won't hire any developers. And as such, we fall further behind countries where companies do that.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    22. Re:Not concerned by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most of the regulatory changes happened during the '80s and early '90s. A period during which the young folks didn't have a say.

      If folks your age were too stupid to realize that free trade agreements were a bad idea or that the government has to actually tax people in order to pay for services, that's not really our fault. You guys will get to retire with most of the Social Security you were promised. And chances are substantially better that you'll have some sort of pension to go with it.

      These days, pensions are rare, I can't remember the last time I even saw a job posting that even promised something more than a 401k match.

      The whole, I got mine, now to hell with you attitude of older voters has done an incredible amount of damage to the ability of the young folks to make a decent living. We work harder than you folks did for less. And we get less and less each year as inflation continually outpaces wage improvements. And folks on social security get COLA even when the inflation is negative.

      Pensions were being attacked in the '70s. It doesn't matter whether myself coming from Generation X or yourself from the Millennium Generation or not, when I entered Silicon Valley with 2 degrees, M.E./C.S. no one gave a shit in upper management to listen to what I said about how to run a company they were attempting to take public in the first place.

      Banks were fucking the public post 1982 when the S&L scandal [yea Republicans] fucked us and Reaganomics two fisted us into oblivion. Then came 2006 [yea Republicans: see a pattern?] drove a pipe up the American People's asses we are still trying to mend.

      In reality, most people are self-centered, me first and fuck the world personalities. When those pricks [MBAs] get to run corporations they really take them down but not before they walk out with a life-time of being able to afford to do whatever the fuck they want.

      Any asshole who thinks Corporate Taxes are too low needs a fist up their ass. 401K plans were then are continue to be a fucking con job. It was the Corporate solution to lying to Pension plan holders and the Boomers ate it up.

      If Generation Y wants to do something, get off your asses, vote out Boomers who are pro-corporations first, fuck the people second and vote in anyone who isn't an OBGYN and/or Evangelical. Two wrongs most certainly don't make a right.

    23. Re:Not concerned by TedHornsby · · Score: 1

      I was born when all 5 Beatles were still alive

      I am assuming you're refering to Pete Best, the original drummer, when you say "all 5 Beatles." It's not something I've ever heard said before or anything, but what do I know, I was born 4 years later than you. Back to the original point of my reply, you were born in early 1980 and John Lennon was shot in December of that year. You were so young you didn't even know who he was or that there was a world outside of your mother's tit, for that matter. So please don't go around trying to identify yourself via historical events that you were in no way capable of comprehending when they happened. Just because you were alive then, doesn't mean anything if you weren't even a year old yet.

    24. Re:Not concerned by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I think it was probably always like that, it's just that people didn't gripe about it.

      Personally, I was born during the last bit of the Carter administration in 1980, and it irritates me to be retroactively moved to a generation that has little in common with me. I may be marginally Gen-X, but none of my friends had cell phones in high school, a few of them had beepers. And most of the kids I went to class with didn't have the internet at home.

      Not that I have anything against Gen-Y or the millenials, but realistically, I was born when all 5 Beatles were still alive and there was some question that I might require a smallpox vaccination.

      I was born in August of '79, so I'm just a little older than you. When I was in high school, about 25% of the kids had cellphones. Internet at home was rare since I'm from a small city in the arse end of New Zealand, but almost everyone had computers and modems to call the local BBSs. Internet access did start becoming more popular with the masses towards the end of my high-school years though. My own first internet connection was a shell account through a uni in another town from around '91 if I recall correctly. The BBSs were however more interesting to me, as most had Fidonet feeds and there was more of immediate relevance easily available to me.

      I'd never really heard the terms "Gen-X" and "Gen-Y" until much later in to twenties. I've never really been sure where I'm supposed to fit; but for the most part, I think it's probably something that can only truly be applied to particular cultural areas. Maybe now that the world is more connected and it's easier for culture to spread around, the cultural areas we apply these terms to may expand; but for "Gen-X" and earlier especially, it seems to me that it applies differently in different places.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    25. Re:Not concerned by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Is this guy delusional? Work to live, don't live to work.

      "We've received some worrying reviews on your performance. We have arrived to the conclusion that you aren't compromised with the project nor the enterprise. We're afraid your kind of profile isn't in sync with our current needs and we will be forced to let you go. Thank you for your years of work and dedication."

      Or, if you have a closer relationship with your HR department:
      "There's no need for you to come on Monday. I hope you'll find somewhere else to work to live."

    26. Re:Not concerned by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If folks your age were too stupid to realize that free trade agreements were a bad idea

      One thing the start of the Iraq war should have shown you is that a lot of noisy people don't necessarily have any say in what happens. It's the people that decided that went for stupid short term choices but that doesn't mean everyone watching was stupid.
      Anyway, don't try to turn this around into an attack on me because I wasn't even in your country, I'm in a different one that was screwed over by people that wanted to lick the arses of people in yours just to be popular.

    27. Re:Not concerned by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Fuck no. Use email for work - we want a trace for fucks sake.

      Surely the point here should be to use whichever is appropriate? If you need an immediate reply, use the phone; if not, send an email. Also, calling someone and talking things through can often avoid a long exchange of emails and save a lot of time. The call can always be followed up by an email if you want a record of what was discussed. Either saying "use the phone" or "use email" is a bit too black-and-white.

      Return email etiquette: When you receive an email from a Baby Boomer, reply using a similar format. If they begin with “Hi Joe” in every email, then you return every email with “Hello Eric”. If they end every email with a letter-like ending such as “Best wishes”, “Best”, “Thanks”, or another equivalent, return your emails with the same courtesy.

      Oh fuck, I bet this guy top-posts.

      Do you disagree with the advice? Seems a pretty easy way to make sure your 'formality-level' is about as expected. I don't know about you, but that's what I aim for - I'm happy to format and sign-off my emails in whatever way, if it means that the recipient isn't thinking about my tone when I want them to think about my points.

    28. Re: Not concerned by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing the word "existed" with the phrase "made popular."

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    29. Re:Not concerned by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      “Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is writing a book.”
      -- Marcus Tullius Cicero

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    30. Re:Not concerned by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Is this guy delusional? Work to live, don't live to work.

      "We've received some worrying reviews on your performance. We have arrived to the conclusion that you aren't compromised with the project nor the enterprise. We're afraid your kind of profile isn't in sync with our current needs and we will be forced to let you go. Thank you for your years of work and dedication."

      Or, if you have a closer relationship with your HR department:
      "There's no need for you to come on Monday. I hope you'll find somewhere else to work to live."

      Nice try, but I''m the boss :-)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    31. Re:Not concerned by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And the knowledge gap has continued to decrease since then.

      setting up word processors to print mailing lists in an hour--something that used to take a secretary a month to type.

      Secretaries are expected to know how to do this themselves now.

    32. Re:Not concerned by Holladon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I'll bet you didn't have the kind of student loan debt anyone 35ish or under (today) had (though it admittedly is EVEN WORSE for around 28ish and under).

    33. Re:Not concerned by Holladon · · Score: 1

      If Generation Y wants to do something, get off your asses, vote out Boomers who are pro-corporations first, fuck the people second

      Worst advice ever. Anyone who didn't sleep through Poli Sci 101 knows that old people are the most dedicated and consistent voting constituency out there, and *these* old people outnumber us, just as they outnumbered their parents. Even if every member of Gen Y and Gen X went out and voted, the Boomers and the handful of WW2-generation grandparents left around (many of whom probably trust their kids to tell them how to vote at this point, if the way my dad controls his mother is a fair indication) would *still* be able to out-vote us. That's even *assuming* we were able to assemble a cohesive voting bloc, which, get real.

      IF there's a solution to be had, it's one younger folks are, consciously or unconsciously, already working towards: namely, writing a new economy from the ground up. The old economy of over-leveraged assets, debt-driven growth, and sloppy-big profit margins is over, period. We've exhausted our collective PPF (at least, the West has). The only way to achieve economic growth is to change the way we think about productivity, the way we think about "jobs," the way we think about money, and the way we interact with each other. Younger workers are feeling these concepts out. Can't say yet whether this will be successful, but one thing working in our favor is that we see through the lies (which is probably why people our age have been marked out as "difficult" -- we're not playing ball because we know the game's rigged). Judge us for being smarter and more forward-thinking than you wish we were if it makes you feel better, I guess. But the bottom line is that we're concerned more about our futures and our kids' futures than we are about our parents' futures, which *used* to be conventional wisdom for how life is supposed to work anyway.

      and vote in anyone who isn't an OBGYN and/or Evangelical.

      I... what? You... don't trust doctors who deliver babies...? For... some... reason?

    34. Re:Not concerned by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      I was born just after WWII. It amuses me how little some adults know about history that I thought of as second nature, because my parents lived in that war and knew what we were fighting for. Now, that experience is lost, probably because of all the intervenning history, and because the schools don't teach it. One thing to note is that the schools have so much on their plate. They how have to cater to the differing agendas of the factions in society, so they have no time to teach who Hitler was and why we had to defeat him.

      What has changed, and it began with Vietnam, is that these once United States have splintered into a bunch of factions, One of these is by generations, and with the economic decline brought about by high tech and bad management and investment ideas in the economy, a battle between young and old has become just another ingredient of dissolution and divide. One of the signs of decline is that people stop working together to get much done. They go through the motions, but nothing really gets done. Decay of nations and society is not far behind.

      Ironically, this is the fault of the Boomer Generation which now runs things. They made the mistake that there was nothing to be learned from the past and that because an idea sounded good we should try it. This is also promoted by the idea that if you trained as a professional and had a specialized academic training that you must be wise, when a classical or liberal arts education would have better, I know of no more morally and intellectually misleading degree to hold than an MBA. I wish all the Business Schools were shutdown. I have less respect for NBA's that for lawyers. In general most of the corruption we face is centered around professionals whose training is specialized. So is it surprising that high-tech has actually damaged the economy more that it has helped, People jobs have been replaced by simulations of social activity that are not the same and that either positions have been lost of don't pay a decent wage. The decline of the American Middle Class if the fault of high tech. It benefits many fewer people that it helps. Now, I have benefitted from it, but how few people if helped and what is lost was not anticipated correctly by my generation.

    35. Re:Not concerned by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Are you Australian?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    36. Re:Not concerned by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      There is something to be said for my being born when I was (also having a natively geeky bent to me didn't hurt either). I was born in '72, saw my first movie in the theater in '77 (Star Wars, yay!) played my first video game (Night Driver, yay!) in '79, went to my first computer camp in '81, banging on an Apple ][.

      I don't know if I am a digital native - I think of it more like I was a babe on the Mayflower. Lucky me!

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    37. Re:Not concerned by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      Of course, I guess I'm not part of this discussion, anyway, because I was born in 1977 -- so I am too old for GEN Y (1980+) and too young for GEN X (up to 1975).

      Maybe you're generation XY? ....
      Are you female?

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    38. Re:Not concerned by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because when the fat cats in America weren't busy screwing over the rest of the country, they were busy screwing over a bunch of other countries?

      Class warfare is not limited by national boundaries. And Americans are finally getting to find out what's been like to live in some of those other places for decades. Get your head out of the sand.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    39. Re:Not concerned by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Email is asynchronous If I am busy I might look at my mail briefly at lunch and the you know do the work that I need to do if you have something urgent speak to me and don't assume I stop every 10 minutes to read all my new mail.

      Doing this repeatedly is likely to make me complain informally or formally to your manager.

  4. How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe that would also be a solution

    1. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, I don't know what generation I belong to, but when I hear "boomer" I think a type of submarine, when I hear "X" I think ecstasy, and when I hear "Y" I think Y-chromosome. But what's with all the labels? How about just "in a professional environment, act professional"?

    2. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by __Paul__ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would be nice if employers adhered to this mantra, too. But no, they make people work in demeaning open-plan offices, require them to attend purile team building sessions and generally treat their workforce like children. It's no wonder employees have contempt for them.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    3. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      So what? Treat them like the royalty they were brought up to believe they are?

      No thanks. Get to work. Finish your projects/assignments. Get paid. Go home and enjoy your life. That's all it should be. Why does corporate culture have to embrace highschool social dynamics and passive aggressive drama? The older generation's predilections for arbitrary social decorum and the new generation's entitlement complex create the dynamic. Both should knock it the fuck off and get to work.

    4. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      But you realize that GEN Y is now just shy of being middle aged, at 33, right?

    5. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by Holladon · · Score: 1

      So what? Treat them like the royalty they were brought up to believe they are?

      If you hate Gen Y because you see them as entitled, perhaps you should ask yourself why a powerless young kid's sense of entitlement would bother you. Why do you need groveling from already-disempowered people? Seems to me that says more about you than it says about them.

    6. Re:How other gens should talk to gen Y at work. by Holladon · · Score: 1

      But you realize that GEN Y is now just shy of being middle aged, at 33, right?

      I'm sending you an internet punch to the teeth for suggesting 33 is almost "middle aged."

  5. How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slowly and loudly.

    If they have an ear horn, speak directly into it.

    1. Re:How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2

      YOU YOUNG HOOLIGANS, WITH YOUR JUNGLE MUSIC!

      (Yes, Mr. Filter, I know that using too many caps is like yelling.)

    2. Re: How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Jungle? That was the 90s. You should get off *my* lawn and take your hip hop with you.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    3. Re:How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to call them all grandpa or grandma, they like it when you do that.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by flink · · Score: 1

      YOU YOUNG HOOLIGANS, WITH YOUR JUNGLE MUSIC!

      (Yes, Mr. Filter, I know that using too many caps is like yelling.)

      They call it dub step now, gramps.

    5. Re: How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      Dub step? What happened to the hippity hop?

  6. So basically... by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't communicate like an idiot. What a good idea!

    1. Re:So basically... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Exactly...
      Who uses "U/R" in professional communication, that's not working in marketing?

    2. Re:So basically... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how is it that common standards make so much sense for html, programming languages, engineering but not for human communication?

      HTML and other standards do change but usually to add clarity or features.

      I can see the value of changes to language which increase clarity or make it more concise (for example sharing a common vocabulary of "patterns" can increase your teams design and programming effectiveness. )

      But arbitrary slang which the other person is unlikely to understand or which doesn't have a clear and common meaning- not so much.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who uses "U/R" in professional communication, that's not working in marketing?

      The next guy to be fired.

    4. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how is it that common standards make so much sense for html, programming languages, engineering but not for human communication?

      Because life is dirty and language is organic.

      Oh, and, those HTML standards you're talking up so much?

      Everyone ignores them.

      I ignore them. Web developers - even while claiming to love them - ignore them. Microsoft ignores them. Mozilla ignores them. Apple ignores them. Google ignores them.

    5. Re:So basically... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Bull. Shit. The standard is "are you able to effectively communicate". That is a language-neutral standard.

    6. Re:So basically... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "language never stands still, it constantly evolves, there is no standard"

      Stop whining.

      True, language never stands still. It constantly evolves. But if you think there is no standard, you're exactly the kind of idiot TFA was referring to.

    7. Re:So basically... by basscomm · · Score: 1

      More than you would think, and that's frightening.

      --
      http://crummysocks.com
    8. Re:So basically... by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      They don't just say "LOL WTF ;-P" in emails. They say it out loud.

      No, seriously, instead of laughing out loud (hence the abbreviation LOL) they will say "ell oh ell". As in, they speak the letters. They'll also say "smiley face" or "winky face" instead of smiling or winking. I wish I was joking but I am not.

      Oh noes! To think my boomer generation said "mumbles" instead of actually mumbling.

      And my born-in-1935 engineer father said stuff like "there were N people already in line."

    9. Re:So basically... by donaggie03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are arguing against a point that no one has made. The Slashdot community understands that language evolves. The issue here is about unprofessional communication in a professional environment. Sure the younger generations have always had their slang and but it wasn't until this generation that they expected to be able to use it while speaking or writing to their boss or clients! You, surely, cannot expect the professional world to embrace the lowest common denominator of hipster drivel. If you are truly a professional, then other people's opinions of you matter. The way you express your self matters. Your appearance matters. It is not on the young upstart to have the mindset of, "This is how I write, and language changes, so deal with it." Unless, of course, they are one of those young upstarts that managed to create their own successful tech giant. Despite what the news would have you believe, those lucky individuals are few and far between.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    10. Re:So basically... by khasim · · Score: 1

      how is it that common standards make so much sense for html, programming languages, engineering but not for human communication?

      I know this one!

      It's because everyone has been talking for as long as they can remember and they confuse that with communication.

      After that it becomes a question of what they want to communicate versus what communication you expect to receive. Ever met a manager who talks during the entire meeting even though nothing he is saying applies to the subject of the meeting?

    11. Re:So basically... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the browser will enforce the standards or not. Whereas the only enforcement mechanisms on language are completely arbitrary, if I tell you that I'm typing this on a wazulator, as long as you understand what a wazulator is, then it's a perfectly acceptable term to use. Other considerations are more about social control than about communication.

    12. Re:So basically... by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > language never stands still, it constantly evolves, there is no standard

      Yes there is. The standard is "don't look like an idiot". This may mean different things but most people would agree that writing emails like "R U going today?" on a regular basis in a business environment would qualify.

      > the world changes. deal with it

      No. Anyone writing emails that can't spell out three-letter words is going to look like an idiot even in the future. Sorry, but I don't see that changing.

    13. Re:So basically... by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 1

      How true. Every time someone debates these things, someone shows up with strong anti-prescriptivist arguments. As usual, there doesn't seem to be any rational basis for this in the real world. There are rules.

    14. Re:So basically... by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty much this. My parents were super liberal, but always taught me that until told otherwise you maintain strict courtesy until told not to. So, it's always, "Yes sir, Yes ma'am." This works out great considering a LOT of the folks I work with, who are my seniors, are ex-military.

    15. Re:So basically... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I ell-oh-elled, out loud.

    16. Re:So basically... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Occasionally I get email that I just don't understand, sometimes even from HR, including acronyms that I have to look up online. Like "LMK" last week that had me baffled. Plus a director who seems to confuse twitter with email, as the emails are always one line long and short on information (I think due to being typed during boring meetings while pretending to pay attention).

    17. Re:So basically... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Sure it is, or am I allowed to slapped the rude elderly as well? I remember standing in line in a bank behind an elderly woman bitching about the fact that the bank had cleared her check before she expected it and caused the account to become overdrawn. She went into a huge tirade about young people being irresponsible, and I don't think a single person in the bank at that time was over 40.

      Respect is a two way street, and one that starts with the previous generation, if the elderly want to be treated with respect, it's probably a good idea to demonstrate it on us, because all we know about manners is what we learned from them. And considering how self entitled they are, typically, it's no wonder that the youth are taking their lead on this.

    18. Re:So basically... by Seumas · · Score: 2

      According to journalists, fucking everyone under thirty. They like to claim that if you want to lure young people to work for your company and have them actually be valuable to your company, you need to cave into their demands, like not using the phone or email or instant messaging or IRC (that's all for old people). Instead, use SMS, twitter, and facebook messaging. Also, don't expect them to spend all their work time at work doing work. Today's work-force demands to be able to facebook and twitter and instagram and Angry Birds it at the office. If you don't "get that", then you're probably old and blah blah blah.

      People saying that businesses need to "adapt" and that "society changes" need to get a fucking grip. Twerking is a popular thing among young people of the last few years. That's fine, I guess. But that doesn't justify doing it at work. So is netflix. I wouldn't tolerate people sitting around watching netflix at the office. When you're at work and in a professional environment, fucking be that. THAT doesn't drastically change from one generation to another.

    19. Re:So basically... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I still roll my eyes every time I see a colleague write something like "lol" - usually people well beyond my mid thirties. Someone using SMS-speak wouldn't even get tolerance. That is a person I would do all I could to avoid communicating with.

    20. Re:So basically... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      So, it's always, "Yes sir, Yes ma'am." This works out great considering a LOT of the folks I work with, who are my seniors, are ex-military.

      I picked up the "yes sir" etc stuff just paying attention to how easily it manipulated people. I found that talking that way to anyone with enough authority to abuse was an excellent way of keeping on their good side. I feel evil doing it because it is not a sign of respect, it is a sign that I think the person has a good chance of being an asshole and I don't want to actually find out for sure.

      Of course now whenever someone addresses *me* that way, I immediately wonder if that is how they see me. Really puts me off.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:So basically... by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      As long as we're talking about courtesy... don't call them "old". While it is common knowledge that the definition of old is 10 years older than you are, referring to another person as 'old' is universally bad form. You can be old school. You can be older. But you can't be old.

      Okay, that out of the way... if Gen Y really wants some respect, they can start by showing some. You are not better than the rest of us because you can ipad your interwebs. We made those things for you, so don't act like growing up with them has somehow made you smarter than everyone else. If anything, the general consensus is that it's making you dumber, but that's neither here nor there.

      Every person wants to be recognized for their contributions. A few compliments, a please and thank you, and recognizing that others earned their bona fides, goes a long way towards getting yours. It's called emotional maturity -- get some, and a lot of doors will open up. Or sit there and rage in your impotence about how much better you are than the rest of us, and fail miserably. You're adults now. It's really your choice.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    22. Re:So basically... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      There isn't really a standard, that's mostly just an illusion. Sure there's certain language that isn't appropriate in a business setting, but for the most part that varies from place to place. What's acceptable here would never work in other parts of the US.

      It's disingenuous to suggest that there isn't major language variety out there. To the extent that it might as well not have a set standard, because what's appropriate in a chemistry lab, is not going to be appropriate in a bank and so on.

    23. Re:So basically... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that every time the prescriptivists drone on about how can can't be used to express permission. It kind of undermines their argument. What's more, I rarely, if ever, see them make the complaint without making at least one typo or grammatical error.

      There aren't rules in the sense that the prescriptivists believe there to be. The "rules" that people seem to be rather fond of, are just conventions. And they change regularly. The rules themselves that people quote, are merely a recording of what people have done in the past to communicate clearly.

      When all is said and done, the only grammatical rule of any value, is that speech should be clear. That's it. There's plenty of language the violates the "rules" but is nonetheless perfectly acceptable language. There's no reason, not to dangle participles, split infinitives or give the grammatical rules a work out. Just so long as the meaning is clear.

    24. Re:So basically... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      No actually we didn't. We validated our pages against the W3C validator. I'm certain others do too.

      Then once the standards were met, we would selectively make whatever changes we had to make to get things functioning where there were bugs.

      God you must have produced an unmaintainable mess.

      Effective communication is the foundation of productive work by groups.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    25. Re:So basically... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "There aren't rules in the sense that the prescriptivists believe there to be."

      Yes, there are.

      The rules DO change with time. But that does not make them any less rules.

      Further, they are not rules in the sense of "laws". they are rules in the sense of "This is how best to speak or write if you want to be fully understood by the maximum number of other people."

      If you want a good example, go watch the old movie "Airplane", and listen to June Cleaver translating "jive".

      It was popular for a time, but little if any of it ever made it into the "rules" of our language. Same with much of the more recent slang. A little bit dribbles in, here or there. But from the 1970s to the 2010s, our language has actually changed very damned little, no matter how many intervening "generations" had their own slang.

    26. Re:So basically... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1
      See my reply above. It's only "an illusion" to people who don't understand the rules.

      "It's disingenuous to suggest that there isn't major language variety out there."

      Variety means nothing. Whenever you have a large, distributed population you will have variety. It still all comes back to the same old rules. You can understand the English in a movie made 90 years ago just as well as you can a movie made today.

      THAT'S how much it really changes, despite all the "variety".

    27. Re:So basically... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I say el oh el a bit. Though usually it's a sarcastic usage.

    28. Re:So basically... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But arbitrary slang which the other person is unlikely to understand or which doesn't have a clear and common meaning- not so much.

      One thing that pissed me off immensely in the 1990s was people making up their own personal abbreviations in speech without telling anyone else what it means. I've been in a room full of experts that had read every single paper on a niche topic that could do nothing but give blank looks to a recent graduate that had only heard of the thing a week before and had only read papers by people in the room. Personal abbreviations tend to collide with accepted ones for extra bonus confusion.

    29. Re:So basically... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Conformity isn't always a good thing, and differences in language can help see a problem from different perspectives. Companies need diversity among employees, while also having conformity in some of their output.

      Rather than trying to have a standard it would be better if we just taught people to be good at communicating in school.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:So basically... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Language is about more than mere communication of facts. Some slang or even mild swearing can help lighten a stressful situation, or present a serious warning in a way that doesn't make people feel uncomfortable. People have been doing it forever. We have all heard stories about some idiot who made a silly mistake, but they serve as useful education and warnings to avoid making the same mistake ourselves without the formality if a memo or email from your boss.

      Around here we don't use formal speech much, but we communicate extremely well and work effectively together. Not hipster douchbag level, but young and old alike join in with the shared memes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:So basically... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree. Group think is a risk for group activities.

      I've worked successfully with people from a dozen countries. But we had a common standard of using english; microsoft documents; standard business and functional requirements documentation; and clearcase change management software.

      I'm no fan of Microsoft but if we had used several different word processors and presentation packages; multiple languages with tons of local idoms and slang; multiple change management systems; and everyone went their own way on functional requirements, it would have been a mess.

      The communication is the medium- not the ideas. You can be nonconformist while communicating in shared agreed upon methods.

      A friends company had a great package developed in "D"-- different than all the rest of the software. When the programmer left- that package was dead. My company had one piece of software developed in C. When the sole programmer left (at age 70 after they said he now should work over 50 hours a week) - they lost several multi-million dollar customers before they could get a replacement C programmer up to speed.

      And the 70 year old had a completely custom style of programming C which made it difficult for other programmers to come up to speed (and the company wasn't offering sufficient pay to get in the top quality programmers and they probably wouldn't come to work for a shop that only had 1 C program anyway for any reasonable amount of money).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    32. Re:So basically... by Holladon · · Score: 1

      I've seen highly-successful people use "U/R" in professional communications. My old boss used to do it all the time, and he's a 50-something millionaire partner in a major international law firm. So did several of his high-powered, multi-million-dollar clients (also Boomers, of course). Most young people I know *cringe* at this shit. The notion that this is a generation divide (at least one that people *my* age are on the wrong side of) is laughable.

    33. Re:So basically... by Holladon · · Score: 1

      Every person wants to be recognized for their contributions. A few compliments, a please and thank you, and recognizing that others earned their bona fides, goes a long way towards getting yours. It's called emotional maturity -- get some, and a lot of doors will open up. Or sit there and rage in your impotence about how much better you are than the rest of us, and fail miserably. You're adults now. It's really your choice.

      That's cute. I used to think that way, and it's why I wasted my twenties kowtowing to unreasonable but powerful 40- and 50-somethings and tiptoeing around their delicate egos, working ungodly long hours without complaint, consistently putting in stellar work product (and getting solid reviews, huge compliments from clients, and reports from coworkers that my bosses sung my praises when I wasn't around), actively seeking out increased responsibility (and living up to it) and only very occasionally pushing back ever so slightly when I recognized that my mental health would fray if I didn't. Guess which one of those put me first on the chopping block when the economy crashed.

      Fuck those "do good work, be respectful, and you'll get far" lies. You know who's still working at my old place of employment, making Monopoly money in a shit economy? The dude whose work quality was far inferior to mine (again, this is from multiple sources), but whose one area of excellence -- kissing the boss's ass -- gave him the edge. He literally spent more on holiday gifts for the man than he did on his own wife. I'll take my shitty salary in exchange for retaining just a tiny sliver of self-respect, thanks. Any system that demands that last infinitesimal sliver doesn't deserve to tell me what *I'm* doing wrong.

  7. Breaking the Ice by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Complement the onion on their belt. Once you have their trust, take them out Old Yeller style.

    1. Re: Breaking the Ice by segin · · Score: 1

      And, thanks to AMC, I first thought it was a reference to last night's episode of Breaking Bad.

    2. Re: Breaking the Ice by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      It's a pop culture two-fer. The Simpsons may be before some younger people's time and I hear the kids today like the Breaking Bad.

    3. Re: Breaking the Ice by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Strange, I thought it was an Old Yeller reference. Guess it's the glue factory for me.

    4. Re:Breaking the Ice by IICV · · Score: 1

      Once you have their trust, take them out Old Yeller style.

      You mean like doing shots behind the barn?

  8. How about by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You treat them as you want to be treated, and don't worry about if they are younger or older.. They are your coworkers, that is all that matters.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:How about by Holladon · · Score: 1

      But then who will be the scapegoat for all the complex, multi-faceted problems I don't want to spend the energy exploring and thinking about in a fair-minded manner with an eye to solutions rather than emotional comfort food???

  9. Silly me by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought using proper English and a little courtesy and respect in writing was required of *all* generations when dealing with business, especially customers and "the boss." Equally silly, I always thought it was only *courteous* to use the phone or even (*shudder*) walk over to someone's office to talk to them!

    But I guess the "kids" think it's funny to use text-slang instead, further exposing their ignorance and lack of respect for others.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Silly me by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

      But I guess the "kids" think it's funny to use text-slang instead, further exposing their ignorance and lack of respect for others.

      I realize you're being rather tongue-in-cheek - but I wanted to say...

      I work at a university, routinely interact with student workers, and have to say - these sorts of "stories" are garbage. Kids vary in terms of their work ethic, as has always been the case. There's nothing particularly different about recent generations compared to earlier ones. Even the kids who need to improve their work ethic mostly know the right way to communicate with their bosses and co-workers. They get a bit loose when talking to coworkers who fall in their own age group - but that was true even way back when *I* was the new kid.

      And, incidentally, back when I was a new worker - trimming the wicks on the gas lamps - there were magazine articles saying basically the same sorts of things to people my age.

      The real lesson here (if there is one) is that the folks who are attempting to make a living giving career advice to young people haven't changed significantly in many decades.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Silly me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forcing people to talk to you on the phone for something that could be handled over email is not only NOT courteous, it's downright rude. Don't force people to conform to your schedule.

    3. Re:Silly me by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      y u b h8ing? communication works as long as evry1 no wut were sayin, rite?

      (And now, if you'll excuse me, I need to find some form of soap that I can use to rinse my brain, since I'm left feeling sullied after having written that. Note: 29 year-old here, and I fully appreciate that the point of communicating is not merely to convey a simple idea, which can in some cases be accomplished through the use of slang, but to also convey a tone. For that, you need to express yourself with more nuance and care than text slang allows.)

    4. Re:Silly me by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      If you believe "kids" use text-slang because of ignorance and lack of respect for others, then you are the one who is ignorant here. In their limited interactions with others, it is simply the standard way of communicating. They have to adjust to communicating more formally. It doesn't demonstrate a lack of respect. It is a normal adjustment to the business world and interacting with people who didn't learn the same non-standard style of communication that they did.

    5. Re:Silly me by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      I think this brand I use can help with the brain rinsing... it's called P-504 or 504P or something...

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    6. Re:Silly me by bmo · · Score: 1

      " it is simply the standard way of communicating."

      No, no it isn't.

      --
      BMO

    7. Re:Silly me by Saunalainen · · Score: 1

      Agreed, many trivial things can be handled by email. However, if you need to discuss or explain anything that's even slightly difficult conceptually then nothing beats an interactive conversation. It's much easier to gauge how much your peer understands (and therefore background you need to cover) when you can interact in real time.

    8. Re:Silly me by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I'm not being entirely tongue-in-cheek by any means. The abuse of the English language at the hands of so-called "University Grads" nowadays is absolutely atrocious. Granted, there have always been those who were good technically that could not write properly, but it seems to me the problem has been exacerbated by the advent of "text-speek." Where it used to be predominantly a problem of phrasing and grammar, now it's a question of whether actual words are even used.

      What's next? Attaching a cat photo to your project proposal?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    9. Re:Silly me by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      The real lesson here (if there is one) is that the folks who are attempting to make a living giving career advice to young people haven't changed significantly in many decades.

      That's half of the lesson: the other half is that it is unfortunately repeatedly necessary career advice, many people failing to grasp the difference between formal and informal language & behavior before reaching adulthood.

      It is, unfortunately, too often necessary to remind people of this, and the real question is if Gen Y will deal with the fact that this is a long-term and rather ubiquitous memo.

  10. Try not to start emails with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yo. Cialiscat,

  11. Backwards by RetiredMidn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Boomer (age 59), I'm finding it more important to embrace the future than ask the young 'uns to adopt the past. I think the last time I used a land line phone at work was over three years ago, and that was an exception; it's all Skype and Hangouts now, and I like it better.

    I do miss some of the perqs of the past: private offices, beer at lunch...

    That said, now get off my lawn!

    1. Re:Backwards by chienandalou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1. I remember when business was mostly done on the phone, and it was a really inefficient medium. So inefficient that you needed specialist employees whose job was placing calls... Every now and then I end up in contact with an industry that is still mostly phone-based (e.g. movers) and I'm reminded what that was like.

      Phone is good when you have something sensitive or open-ended and/or you really need to sound someone out, hear their tone of voice, pauses and so forth. Interestingly, I've noticed that I and most folks set those calls up with an e-mail or text - we don't just cold-call. That feels rude now.

      I've also noticed that not all of my fellow senior colleagues have adapted to e-mail well. Messages should be short and clear and not waste the recipient's time.

      Beer at lunch, that was good.

    2. Re:Backwards by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 2

      It's so cute that you think a 3D FPS is "old school"!

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    3. Re:Backwards by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      I do miss some of the perqs of the past: private offices, beer at lunch...

      Beer?

      Bottle of Bordeaux.

      And yes, I do have a private office.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Backwards by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1

      Beer?

      Bottle of Bordeaux.

      And yes, I do have a private office.

      Hey, I was a lot younger then! As it turns out, I visited Bordeaux last week, and now realize I have a lot of lost time to make up!

      Open office plan at work, but I've been working at home 3-4 days per week lately, which is pretty private...

    5. Re:Backwards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't use a land line anymore at work, becuase they took mine away! Seriously. We're supposed to use a headset with the computer, but they didn't provide us a headset. So when my computer says I have an incoming call I have to ignore it.

      Never used skype, probably never will. Seems stupid. I just walk to the person's cubicle to talk, or if they're somewhere else I send email. Stuff written in an email works, provided the person can read and actually does read. Voice is often forgotten since there's no record left over and it's a great excuse to say "I forgot". I do get strange looks from people sometime when I'm out in the parking lot and have to say "please send me email so I don't forgot".

      And no, I'm not anti-technology. I've been using email for 30+ years.

    6. Re:Backwards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I used to have a sizeable office. That was also my worst professional job ever. Though I do miss the office, and the door that can be shut.

    7. Re:Backwards by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I had a young university friends a few years ago who worked at one of those hip new tech companies, and they got a keg every day at launch.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  12. Not "old people" .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ...1337 g33z0rz.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Not "old people" .... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      AKA Greybeards.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. How about some respect for ancient knowlege by cygtoad · · Score: 1

    How about having some respect for the knowledge which may be gathered by your elderly counterparts? Not everything can be learned from college or between the pages of a technical manual. I think sometimes new grads tend to feel like they know it all because they typically are working from fresher learning of technical info. Your more senior counterparts are not dinosaurs. They have learned to navigate office politics and interface well with their business partners. Whether you are aware of it or not you can learn a great deal from senior staff. To think otherwise it to cripple your own path.

    1. Re:How about some respect for ancient knowlege by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      *Snort* *laugh*
      Sorry, I find that very funny considering I work with someone who by all rights and accounts who is in their fifty's should not be there.
      He doesn't meet the minimum requirements to have the job, he is a high school drop out, proud of it. Talks in south Carolina drawl, cat calls all the female employees, and has this 'fantasy' that everyone in the place is 'related'.

    2. Re:How about some respect for ancient knowlege by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about having some respect for the knowledge which may be gathered by your elderly counterparts?

      Youth have always been indestructible and all-knowing, in their own minds at least. All generations when young. I was in the Air Force before I started college in 1976, so I was ten years older than most of the students by my Junior year.

      One class, I don't remember the subject of the class but I do remember an insolent eighteen year old punk saying the instructor, who held a Master's degree and was about 40, was ignorant.

      "Kid," the instructor said, "I've forgotten more than you've ever learned."

    3. Re:How about some respect for ancient knowlege by cygtoad · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a winner. Are you suggesting that this individual is a representative sample of boomers? BTW, I am an X'er, not a boomer.

    4. Re:How about some respect for ancient knowlege by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      No just poking holes in you're 'always respect' comment.
      Age does not equal wisdom or knowledge.
      And it is no secret about office politics, the corporate office system as it is now is geared to psycopathic behavior. And unless you are born into the boss's or owner's family. Or are a family friend. It is the only way to get ahead.

  14. Don't categorize by Andrew+Lindh · · Score: 1

    First, don't call them "old people". Second, don't call "them" anything as a group. Third, use correct written English. No made up words, strange spelling, or text speak.

    1. Re:Don't categorize by JustOK · · Score: 1

      "text speak" is made up, it's not a word, but a made up phrase. Sometimes, for new things, you need new words.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Don't categorize by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      First, don't call them "old people". Second, don't call "them" anything as a group.

      Nah, we geezers aren't politically correct, most of us think that PC crap is bullshit. I'm old, you don't have to dance around the fact. Now, if you're talking about someone in their 40s, they're not old. You're mischaracterizing them. You're old when you get a discounted bus pass.

      It pisses me off when they want ID for beer. I say "do I get a senior discount?" They say "no" and I inform them I'll show ID if a cop pulls me over or for a discount; there's no way I look younger than 21 and I refuse to give stupidly offensive people my money.

      Third, use correct written English. No made up words, strange spelling, or text speak.

      Indeed, they make one look incompetently uneducated.

    3. Re: Don't categorize by mrbester · · Score: 1

      It's better to look competently uneducated or incompetently educated then? Double negatives never done helped no one, bub.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:Don't categorize by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      #REKT

    5. Re: Don't categorize by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The incompetently educated are incompetently uneducated, since if you were educated by incompetents, you're uneducated.

  15. Re:Work Hard? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is absolutely ludicrous. This happens in *every* generation. Every generation says to their children: "we were better mannered, we didn't have premarital sex, we didn't have teenage sex, people didn't do drugs, we worked harder...". Apparently, they also had shorter memories (and in those case when they actually did work longer and harder (19th century), they had to because the productivity was lousy).

    Also, I've noticed that "work ethic" is a shibboleth of religious wackos. Any other, normal, non-sociopathic person simply values high output per unit of effort without feeling the need to make such a fuss about it. It's simple economy.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  16. Baby Boomers are a burden now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to work eighty hours a week for the first three or four years to prove our worth,..

    As a Gen X'er, I saw my Dad bust his ass.

    Then get laid off when management made cuts to make their numbers. R&D was ALWAYS one of the first cuts. My father told me "Do NOT become an engineer! Become one of the bean counters."

    What did I learn? Busting your ass does NOT prove anything. It will NOT be rewarded. Living to work is stupid: you work to live.

    That's why all the Baby Boomers are now a BURDEN on our medical system: all that work and no play made them obese, diabetic, and with heart attacks. They ran themselves into the ground with work.

    Even though they worked that hard, they are taking more out of the system than they EVER put in.

    And now we have a bunch of self entitled ...

    1. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "That's why all the Baby Boomers are now a BURDEN on our medical system: all that work and no play made them obese, diabetic, and with heart attacks."

      That would be due to their non-exercising lifestyles and spectacularly shitty diet. Exercise and diet weren't cool when Boomers were growing up, and it shows. They played plenty, but it wasn't particularly healthy.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My grandfather busted his ass and died at fifty five of a heart attack. My father busted his ass and died at fifty five of a heart attack. I'm taking it easy. If I still die at fifty five of a heart attack, at least I won't have wasted thirty years trying to impress some crusty old MBA halfwit with 80 hour weeks.

    3. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by Truekaiser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If i had not already posted a bunch. I would mod this up as MUCH as i can.
      I think most of the gen x and y people. Myself included looking at our parents. The so called 'baby boomers and greatest generation(HA)'. Saw how the 50+ work hour weeks wrecked them, heard how they lamented how they did not have the time they wanted for themselves. Or how they could not spend the time they wanted to their family.
      And thought. No, I, won't do that to myself.

    4. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by Animats · · Score: 2

      Exercise and diet weren't cool when Boomers were growing up, and it shows.

      You missed the early 1980s, when everybody did aerobics.

      In the 1960s, you almost never saw oinkers of high school age. Now they're common.

    5. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What a quaint notion to think gen x and y possess such self-awareness and freedom. Perhaps individuals here and there (yourself included) have thought as much. Such shifts in how a society functions do not generally occur because a few college educated kids think "Fuck that." No, sorry, you're no more enlightened than any other group to have existed in the last couple hundred years calling for the end to the status quo.

      In reality, reduced dependence on manual labor (for a number of reasons) and a shift to office environments (where a great many still toil away 50+ hours per week) have changed how we work in the US. None of these things are due a sudden enlightenment by the latest generations. The movement away from manual labor was being sold to us before the term generation x was coined. It's expensive. Expensive doesn't help keep costs down and push profits up.

      You've not realized anything new. And you're still blind to the truth.

    6. Re:Baby Boomers are a burden now. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I was in primary school in the seventies. One girl in the whole school had a weight problem and by today's standards she would be classified as thin. We had no peanut allergies(etc), and a total of two asthmatics

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  17. Re:OMG by pspahn · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... I would fire their ass immediately.

    ...with an email stating the following:

    OMG! WTF R U Doing! y wud u evar!!!! tha client wuz gonna b $$$ n now its ALL FXD! bcuz of that!

    U R FIRED!!1

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  18. like crafty brilliant hobgoblins of goodness by ClassicASP · · Score: 1

    ....or maybe more like great uncles. These are people who have managed to stay valuable for many years and have decades of wisdom and experience behind them. They are not stupid, and can see things as they are about to happen before they actually do happen and the patterns of business repeat themselves. Don't just pay attention to what they say. Pay attention to what they DO because to just be dismissive of their ramblings will likely yield to be, well, foolish.

  19. You must be at that awkward age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me guess 30-50? When you get beyond 50 like me, email becomes a god-send. I can never remember what people tell me on the phone or in person, I can never remember what I read in the email either but at least I can re-read them as necessary. Text chats are useful too but emails are the best.

    1. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by atam · · Score: 2

      It also has an added bonus that you now have a written proof of the conversions in the email trail. So they cannot deny that they never said this or that. It is important in some sectors of the corporate world.

    2. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Let me guess 30-50? When you get beyond 50 like me, email becomes a god-send. I can never remember what people tell me on the phone or in person, I can never remember what I read in the email either but at least I can re-read them as necessary. Text chats are useful too but emails are the best.

      I think that's more a personality thing than an age thing. I have an incredible visual memory, but things said to me over the phone often don't stick very well.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I follow up the conversation with an email to confirm that we're on the same page and to provide a record of the discussion. But it's far faster to talk to someone for 10-15 minutes than to spend a day or few emailing back and forth.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      And the whiteboard in someone's office is a "huge" bonus for diagramming things, which can't be easily done via chat or emails.

      Don't get me wrong -- if I just need to ask someone to do something simple, an email or a chat message will suffice.

      But when there is any degree of discussion to be done with back-and-forth communications, nothing beats a conversation.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    5. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      I'm not even in my 20s yet and I can't remember what people tell me or what I read.

    6. Re:You must be at that awkward age... by Holladon · · Score: 1

      I'm 32 and share your perspective. It's not an age thing.

  20. Re:OMG by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Too bad the opposite isn't true, I wish I could find a profession where the now-rare skills of good spelling and grammar are valued...and no it isn't journalism.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  21. Re:Whatever happened to merit? by Truekaiser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a problem, or maybe it was the 'point' of the work hard mindset.
    That if you work hard at where you're at, you can be seen as 'you best fit here' so the bosses will pass you over for promotion because they figure your replacement will be worse.

    But to be honest, everyone should agree and realize it's not your merits that get you jobs and promotions. It has always been and always will be WHO you manage to befriend, and WHO'S family you were born into.

  22. Re:Whatever happened to merit? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the bullet points the author laid out are actually useful to anyone for moving up in a company, then that company is not worth working for. Sure, I used to use the phone a lot more than I do now. That doesn't mean I want to continue relying it, especially when the information could more easily be sent by email or chat, or the most horrible of acts, talking face-to-face.

          Acting like a dick never works, and insisting that people with 5x your experience do things "your way" is about as dicky as you get.

            Brett

  23. Part of the problem is respect by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm 30 and just at the very edge of the gen x-millennial divide. One thing that has been a major problem for me and most of the gen exers and millennials I know that are somewhat intelligent with regard to the boomers is respecting them as a generation. Sure, there are individuals worthy of respect but in my experience they are, as much as any generation can be, the epitome of what is wrong with and killing America. This is true of them, taken as a whole, regardless of whether or not they are liberal, moderate, conservative, etc.

    The fact is that when the generations before the boomers handed over the reigns of power starting in 1992, we saw a precipitous decline in the quality of governance in corporate America, governments and everywhere else you looked. Boomers can squawk "correlation is not causation" until they are all entitled to Medicare paid out of my generation's meager earnings, but you cannot deny the *ahem* "correlation" there. Since the WWII and Silent generations have waned in their influence, our society has gone off a fucking cliff.

    And you know what the worst part is? I have "conservative" boomer acquaintances who merely find a conservative angle for their entitled attitude. They'll say "I earned my Social Security, you young fucker" and I say back to them that it's mathematically impossible for most of my generation to even have a shot at that, we're still paying and you motherfucker want to tell me how you are entitled to cut of my paycheck because you didn't vote for anyone who was willing to restore the Social Security trust fund LBJ liquidated to fund Vietnam? Piss off! If they got started in 1992, it would probably be fixed by now.

    And then they get to tell us how evil we are...

    1. Re:Part of the problem is respect by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Sonny, 1992 was the election of Bill Clinton. What president in US history had a better record of peace, prosperity and economic growth?

      None.

      The technology that you take for granted on a day-to-day basis was brought to full flower in the time you claim was a disaster.

      It seems to me you are just trying to weasel out of paying the same burden your forebears did. The debt today is no different in terms of percentage of GDP that it was when I was born right after WWII. You didn't hear the boomers complaining about it.

      So grow up.

    2. Re:Part of the problem is respect by visualight · · Score: 1

      ...and I say back to them that it's mathematically impossible for most of my generation to even have a shot at that...

      It's bullshit based on twisted numbers, intended o get idiot wage earners to accept getting rid of it altogether.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    3. Re:Part of the problem is respect by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Peace = Yugoslavian War
      Peace = Constant bombings of Iraq whenever a Monica Lewinsky headline appeared
      Prosperity = A Conservative Congress that negotiated many reforms.
      Technology Brought to Full Flower = Largely GenX
      Debt today = WWII, that was a monstrous war. And here in a quasi peace time, we are at that level. God forbid we find ourselves in a crisis like WWII.

      Yes, we've heard Baby Boomers complain constantly. I've heard more boomers complain than GenY.

    4. Re:Part of the problem is respect by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck off

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    5. Re:Part of the problem is respect by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Peace = Yugoslavian War

      You killed a hell of a lot of old microwave ovens. Pat yourself on the shoulder.

      Technology Brought to Full Flower = Largely GenX

      You actually believe that don't you?

      God forbid we find ourselves in a crisis like WWII.

      Just wait a few weeks

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  24. Texting abbreviations in emails... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Forget about Gen Y geeks trying to get along with their older counterparts in the IT department. I see this kind of inappropriate informality from TEACHERS in school related communications.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  25. Can we be less priggish? by chienandalou · · Score: 1

    Courtesy and respect are good, and asking yourself how a message will look to its recipient is good.

    But business etiquette changes! The kind of writing *recommended* in the article would have seemed impertinent 40 years ago. I'm remembering the secretary's manual from which I learned typing in the early 1970s, which prescribed rigid rules of address and epistolary etiquette.

    And texting ... I have the same gut reaction to "R U going" that you do. But I have to step back and realize that it's because I've got a stick up my butt. "R U going" is quite clear.

    (a) Language always changes. (b) People's language use is basically formed in their early 20s. Ergo (c) part of the experience of growing old is that you will be increasingly surrounded by unfamiliar words and ways of speaking and writing. Being a curmudgeon is too easy.

    1. Re:Can we be less priggish? by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      I sent a follow up email to my last potential job's HR department asking "R U going 2 hire me or wat?" - still waiting for them to reply...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  26. Re:Work Hard? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Every generation says to their children: "we were better mannered, we didn't have premarital sex, we didn't have teenage sex,

    My parents were married at 18. I was born 7 months after the marriage.

    bloody irresponsable I call it.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  27. Different attitude toward technology by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    The older generation grew up along with technology, younger people grew up with complex technology already developed. The older generation can remember whn you could count the transistors in a computer and I think has a stronger tendency to think of complex technology as a system of simpler components. I think that younger people have a more "functional" view, less interest in understanding the detailed underpinnings.

    Put positively, the younger generation as an approach to technology that is more like abstract mathematics - once you know how something behaves you no longer need to understand why it behaves that way. Rather than getting bogged down in trying to figure out how data is sent between phones, they are happy to write an app that takes advantage of that data. This sort of view allows you to write code that takes advantage of the vast array of existing complex systems that are already available.

    Put negatively technology is more "magic" to the younger generation - cell phones just work, they are less likely to wonder how the hell someone can "find" your phone to call you when you are in a country that you have never visited before. This can lead to trusting "magic" technology but not understanding its limits. This sort of view can result in writing horrifically inefficient code that is layered on top of other code that you don't understand at all.

    1. Re:Different attitude toward technology by Animats · · Score: 1

      This sort of view can result in writing horrifically inefficient code that is layered on top of other code that you don't understand at all.

      See the last Java stack backtrace that appeared in your browser when some server-side code aborted.

  28. Dress appropriately. by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Just just communication skills - far too many younger people have never been told how to dress for work or for a job interview. Everyone working in an office should own at least one decent suit. Learn when to wear a tie. Cover your tats is you have them. These things are noticed by people who are in charge.

  29. Re:Work Hard? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, I've noticed that "work ethic" is a shibboleth of religious wackos.

    Indeed, and the religion that "work ethic" comes from is the worship of money.

  30. Re:Same as always by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Yup, it's those old fags who keep using the offensive language - it's so gay.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  31. Mirror Mirror by wrackspurt · · Score: 1

    mirror the level of formality your co-workers use

    We're innately built to pursue imitation as the best form of flattery. Just relax and let nature take its course.

    "A mirror neuron is a neuron that fires both when an animal acts and when the animal observes the same action performed by another. Thus, the neuron "mirrors" the behavior of the other, as though the observer were itself acting. Such neurons have been directly observed in primate and other species including birds. In humans, brain activity consistent with that of mirror neurons has been found in the premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, the primary somatosensory cortex and the inferior parietal cortex."

    "The function of the mirror system is a subject of much speculation. Many researchers in cognitive neuroscience and cognitive psychology consider that this system provides the physiological mechanism for the perception/action coupling (see the common coding theory).They argue that mirror neurons may be important for understanding the actions of other people, and for learning new skills by imitation. Some researchers also speculate that mirror systems may simulate observed actions, and thus contribute to theory of mind skills, while others relate mirror neurons to language abilities."

  32. in a word, its quite a bit different. by nimbius · · Score: 1, Informative
    as a Gen Y guy myself, i have to wonder what this quote means:

    manage, motivate, and retain talented members of the Millenial generation on the job.

    in the wake of the enron scandal, the recession, and the fact that most of my friends and peers are not only out of work but saddled with 50k or more of unforgiveable debt, the idea of "corporate loyalty" is laughable. If you want to motivate me and retain me, pay me. To me work is work, a means to get paid and do something i genuinely appreciate. im sure any generation can relate to that

    beyond the most generic office etiquitte noted by OP, here are a few others:
    read your IM's, i use them more religiously than you can imagine to convey important information.
    Do not call me. the phone is on my desk and i've an extension, sure, but its far more natural and efficient for me to email or IM you. If you have to call me, keep shit brief. no um's or err's or giggles...just the facts. telephones are incredibly distracting.
    try to maintain communications parity. for example: if i email you, email me in response. dont take every IM as an occasion to march down to my cube, its a timewasting distraction.
    I dont care about the office politics. dont bring it to my desk.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:in a word, its quite a bit different. by betterprimate · · Score: 1

      It would be a whole lot easier to understand you if you learned basic punctuation and grammar.

    2. Re:in a word, its quite a bit different. by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      as a Gen Y guy myself, i have to wonder what this quote means:

      beyond the most generic office etiquitte noted by OP, here are a few others:

      read your IM's, i use them more religiously than you can imagine to convey important information.

      So you expect your coworkers to be tied to their computer screen or constantly checking their cell phones? IM's are terrible for conveying anything except the most trivial information, e.g. a telephone number, or a real-time status. Important information, as you say, generally needs context and dialogue. This is why we use email, telephone, and face to face.

      Do not call me. the phone is on my desk and i've an extension, sure, but its far more natural and efficient for me to email or IM you. If you have to call me, keep shit brief. no um's or err's or giggles...just the facts. telephones are incredibly distracting.

      No, IM's are incredibly distracting. If I'm calling someone, it's because something needs to be discussed. If you can't talk at that time, then you call someone back. It's incredibly efficient, this dialog thing.

      try to maintain communications parity. for example: if i email you, email me in response. dont take every IM as an occasion to march down to my cube, its a timewasting distraction.

      Again, face to face is often the best way to discuss things instead of back and forth in email. Email for monologs, sure, but face to face is the ONLY efficient way to find out if the other person really does understand.

      Based on your comments, it looks you want to live in your own small little world and just do the tasks assigned to you. You have no interest in other employees or what is going on in other parts of the company. Good luck with that.

      I dont care about the office politics. dont bring it to my desk.

      No, because politics never affects you, since you are so important. Give me a break.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  33. Still this nonsense? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    Didn't Billy Gates, Steve Jobs and Bezos didn't happen? What about Gogglers?

    Even in the City of London, a place where everybody used to wear a neck tie and a suite, that is old advise. I have not worn a suit or necktie for 20 years, and when interviewing people for high tech positions the last thing I, and other hiring personnel, was thinking about was the candidate's attire.

    As long as people are clean the topic isn't even talked about (in some localities is even illegal to impose a dress code).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Still this nonsense? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The FIRST advice should be learn to write and speak English well. Spelling errors, bad punctuation, incomplete sentences and slang in business communications are not going to get you where you want to go.

    2. Re:Still this nonsense? by lennier · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about Gogglers?

      What about them, indeed. Prancing down the streets of Neo-Londinium in their altitude scarves and and flying tweeds as if they had just stepped out of the furnace-room of Her Majesty's Airship Ultra-Titania. Always clacking on their pocket telestenographs and with a steam automaton snorting behind as like as not, fouling the pavement with coal smoke and terrifying the horses.

      Youth of today have no respect.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    3. Re:Still this nonsense? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Didn't Billy Gates, Steve Jobs and Bezos didn't happen? What about Gogglers?

      Based on the above sentence you would need intense training to flip a burger

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  34. This one weird trick will SAVE your career! by krovisser · · Score: 1

    Click here to learn this one trick before THEY find out.

  35. They wish it was an issue. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    When I look around my office most colleagues are at least 35, if any group of people has been hit by the economic meltdown that is 20 somethings.

    So if you as a 20 something have a job, don't piss of your older colleagues: they are in control of the situation with a vengeance, not only they are the bosses, but they are also getting most of the well paid jobs.

    Younger people have an image problem, behaving like over developed teenagers won't endear them with the old timers holding the reigns of power.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:They wish it was an issue. by Holladon · · Score: 1

      When I look around my office most colleagues are at least 35, if any group of people has been hit by the economic meltdown that is 20 somethings.

      So if you as a 20 something have a job, don't piss of your older colleagues: they are in control of the situation with a vengeance, not only they are the bosses, but they are also getting most of the well paid jobs.

      Younger people have an image problem, behaving like over developed teenagers won't endear them with the old timers holding the reigns of power.

      The "image problem" is mostly manufactured by folks older than them. This whole "kids today have no respect" is one of the oldest, most time-honored memes around. The difference is that, this time around, if the older folks keep dismissing younger folks and writing them off this way, thanks to this absolute bullshit economy (which said younger folks could not possibly have done anything about; that one's squarely in older generations' corner), in ten-twenty years all the older folks are going to be sitting around enfeebled and dependent and wondering why on earth there seem to be so few people with quality experience to take care of them. Have people really so quickly forgotten that helping younger generations is the foundation of *everyone's* future? This post seems to be trying to take on a stern tone, but it mostly comes off as deeply short-sighted. Anyone who looks around a reasonably-sized office and finds that the youngest employee is *35* ought, if he or she has an ounce of sense, to be very, very worried about the future.

  36. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please stop including redundant info in your emails. It wastes everyone's time including yours. The sooner we drop the above formalities the better.

    I don't care if someone has a salutation or signature on their email -- I can usually skip the bookends without too much trouble -- as much as I detest it when I get mails with subjects including the words: "message, memo, note, about, re:, from, email, etc." as in, "subject: a note from Bob Smith re: inventory". Really? It's from Bob Smith? How would I have known? It's a note? So, not a box of chocolate or a flaming bag of dog poop contained digitally therein? That's good, I suppose. "From"? "Re"? Don't get me started. The only necessary, non-redundant word in the entire subject: "inventory". And if I'm reading it on some tiny smartphone screen, it probably got cut off! Arg.

    On the other hand, I have vowed to myself that no one will ever get a positive review, recommendation or reference from me if they repeatedly write "noone" or other similarly annoying and readily detectable misspellings. Don't they ever wonder what the squiggly line is all about? I think the lack of curiosity implied here is what really hurts my wiener the most. Same goes for anyone using txt-speak in a medium without a 160 (or fewer) character limit. And punctuation, caps and paragraphs exist for a reason. If it takes me twice as long as it should to figure out what someone means, I'll be spending that extra time thinking how much I hate them. And if it's cc'd to a whole department, that time loss and irritation multiplier gets . . . multiplied.

    Whole companies aren't immune from the plague, either. I worked at a firm where the annual employee evaluation form had checkboxes in the "reason for salary increase" section that included the option: "Merrit". I think everyone would agree with me that that's a bit of a red flag.

    And for the sake of disclosure, in case you hadn't already guessed it, the most frequent criticism of my communication style is "long-winded". Followed by "pompous jackass".

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  37. the phone issue is the most annoying by Karmashock · · Score: 3

    I hate phones. Phones are stupid. I can see using them as a last resort or if something is really important. But if you're just doing day to day communications they're a giant waste of time. Texts are faster, less disruptive, and frequently more productive.

    In a text, people get to the point immediately. They don't spend five minutes with rambling irrelevancies and they don't spend another five minutes after the main point with more rambling irrelevancies.

    Sometimes you need to get through those rambling irrelevancies just so people can say them and we can move beyond them. But being burdened with them in every single conversation is annoying.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have to disagree with you.

      I'm in my early 40's and currently working in a company where I'm one of the older employees. (Basically, the only people older than me are the management, owners or partners of the company.) Before this though, I worked in a manufacturing place (as their only I.T. guy) where I was about the youngest one there (except for a receptionist who they let go eventually, when the economy made things really slow for them).

      So I've been on both sides of the "age fence". At the manufacturing job, it was entirely a generation used to picking up the phone and dialing someone's extension if they had a question or wanted to see if you could look at something for them. Everyone had Outlook running on their desktop PC so emails were usually fairly promptly read and answered.... but for these people, the phone was king. That took some getting used to for me, because being an I.T. guy, I really liked the flexibility of other communications tools like IM, email, etc. But in the end, I think they were correct. In a phone call, you can immediately convey actual *emotions* along with the request or problem. There was no doubt if an issue was causing someone intense frustration, or was just a minor thing annoying them. That wasn't always obvious when reading an email or IM message. As an I.T. person, you can do a lot to calm someone down during a brief phone call (even if it's just going off topic a bit to crack a joke or pointing out some upside to a change the person didn't initially consider). By contrast, even the best written instructions with screen-shots in an email just stresses someone out further (Oh no.... MORE stuff I gotta do to try to get this working again!!), once they're upset.

      Where I work now, the younger crowd LOVES to send IMs or emails or set up a video conference, or even use some other project management or collaboration tool via the web.... Only a few of them seem comfortable making a phone call within the office, by contrast. But still, I have to waste a lot of time going up to see someone in person and talking to them to figure out what they need, because they simply don't put enough details in what they type out when they have issues. The people who make the phone calls still communicate more effectively what they need or what's not working for them.

    2. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by Xochil · · Score: 1

      Texts conjure up the expectancy of immediate/near immediate response. All too often the question doesn't merit that. I would rather not have my cell phone be a conduit for what you think is important...but isn't.

      Secondly, many of us prefer to reserve texting for friends/family/work urgencies...not for sundry office dialog. Email is my preferred method for work communications. If the situation is complex enough where an email dialog would take much longer than a voice conversation...then call.

      Some people are just too lazy to write a coherent email and insist on poorly written unimportant texts. Non important texts get ignored. Repeat senders of non-urgent work texts get blocked.

    3. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto for me too, but it can be annoying when phone is required because of my speech and hearing impediments. :( Also, online communications can be annoying when people can't type and read well. Ugh.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Yes, the issue for me however is the useless phone conversations. I can hold 20 different text conversations at once as well as manage many things through email. But when I get a phone call, I can't do anything else. Which means if they're wasting my time they're REALLY wasting my time.

      I think many companies would improve efficiency by switching to internal instant message systems so coworkers could share information, ask questions, instruct, etc quickly without tying up a lot of time.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is the real issue. Young or old, what will set you apart in any work environment is using the right tool for the job. If you need to talk to someone in the next cubicle...walk over and talk. You need the exercise. If you're setting up lunch, text. If you need details, email. If the email thread isn't working, pick up the phone and hash it out. There's also Chat, Skype, and yes, I even use a (gasp) fax machine on occasion.

      What's up with all the one-trick ponies around here?

    6. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Now there's something I don't understand. A phone call is considered "distracting" these days, but a video conference is fine? I can actually get other things done during a phone call if the other party doesn't require my full attention.

    7. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Weird - when I'm on the phone at work, I have two hands free to do whatever I want during the conversation. Maybe you're just inefficient.

    8. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If you can have a full conversation and write an unrelated email at the same time without sounding distracted on the phone then you're a better multitasker then I am. I can respond to dozens of text messages and emails in the time it takes to have one phone conversation giving full attention to each message. But phones waste my time.

      I can only really do one thing at a time. I multitask by switching rapidly between tasks. But each task gets full attention.

      When I get a phone call, I can't do much else without giving less attention to the phone call which means I might miss part of the call or otherwise offend the caller which is not acceptable.

      As a result, the phone call wastes time. Multiple people have backed that up and verified my experience in this matter.

      Why the insult, Omnichad? Why be a douchebag? Because that's what you did... you know that right? Were you even aware of that or were you just so indifferent to your own behavior that your inner douchebag just leaked out?

      Don't get mad... I'm not the one that acted like a douchebag. I'm just the guy that was sadly targeted by one.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If more information is being conveyed in your phone call than your texts/emails, then it takes the time it takes because that much time is required.

      In my case, the content conveyed is about as much as a text/email so I am mentally idle while waiting for the other person to get to the point in the phone conversation. There's no reason at all I can't do something else in the meantime. They're going to say what they're going to say, and they're going to think I'm rude if I ask them to stop telling me all those useless details.

    10. Re:the phone issue is the most annoying by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Email it.

      Phones are for people that like to hear the sound of their own voices.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  38. Gen Y?! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they're cool. Not!

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  39. Re:Work Hard? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My parents were married at 18. I was born 7 months after the marriage.

    bloody irresponsable I call it.

    My relatives always said that the second and later kids take 9 months, but the first one can pop out any old time. :)

  40. Gen X Gen Y what? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    A generation is 30 years. Gen X, Y, and probably Z are all part of the same generation. If you're 40 today, the next generation is 10 years old and so unlikely to be one of your co-workers. There are basically zero cultural differences due to age between people in the same job in the tech industry, other than some sort of artificial picket fence manufactured by marketing to sell t-shirts to teenagers who haven't figured it out yet.

    It's all in your mind, get over it.

    1. Re:Gen X Gen Y what? by russotto · · Score: 1

      There are basically zero cultural differences due to age between people in the same job in the tech industry, other than some sort of artificial picket fence manufactured by marketing to sell t-shirts to teenagers who haven't figured it out yet.

      ROTFL. There's an large cultural difference between people born just after WWII and those just before, and that's less than ten years. Things change faster than that. I got the tail end of nuclear war hysteria; my younger co-workers grew up largely in a world without a Soviet Union. Things like that make a difference.

      As for this article, it's crappy link-bait of course.
      1) Use the phone: Hey, my father (Baby Boom generation) was using email before I even started school; maybe before I was born. If you haven't figured it out now, you're probably not in my management chain.

      2) I'm Gen X, not Gen Y; please don't lump us together. The stereotype of us as cynical and disaffected slackers is unfair but not wholly without basis. We DID learn to say Please and Thank You, but we recognize them as the empty words they are.

      3) No, I am not ending my emails with that hilariously ridiculous signature that you do. You do realize that the legalese nonsense at the bottom doesn't really protect you when you accidentally email trade secrets to journalists, right?

      4) Again you're conflating Gen X and Gen Y. Perhaps you meant to tell me not to use 133t $p34K?

      5) If you're a Boomer in my management chain, you damn well better be a digital PIONEER, not a mere immigrant. If I try to baffle you with technology-speak, you should be telling me not to teach grandmother to suck eggs -- and I'll tell the millennials the same.

      6) Ha ha, yeah, "work hard", I'm sure that's how you remember it now. Except those of you who got drafted, I'm not buying it; I've heard the stories.

    2. Re:Gen X Gen Y what? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      ROTFL. There's an large cultural difference between people born just after WWII and those just before, and that's less than ten years. Things change faster than that. I got the tail end of nuclear war hysteria; my younger co-workers grew up largely in a world without a Soviet Union. Things like that make a difference.

      You do know that LOL and ROTFL originated in the early to mid 80s on BBSes right, when most so-called Gen Xers were still figuring out the finer points of how to read? As did L33T SP33K. To say nothing of the fact that you'll have more in common culturally with any US citizen than with say a Finnish or English person. Fakey made up boundaries and useless distinctions applied to people who at the outside left college a few years before you started it. I'm not talking about people born in the 1940s here mind you, more like the 1970s. Go much further back and you will start to see a few differences. Not enough to justify any form of differentiated behaviour thiough.

    3. Re:Gen X Gen Y what? by Holladon · · Score: 1

      The way the world economy is heading and with actual noise about an actual honest-to-god old-fashioned world war (weren't those supposed to be impossible now?) -- you may be more on the nose with this than you intended.

  41. Re:Whatever happened to merit? by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    Is that directed at me or the article? I'm not a boomer, but I am pre-80s. If someone keeps ringing my phone thinking it's going to make me favor them, it's likely to be the opposite. I'm not even sure why we have desk phones anymore. They seem like phone-booths or printed memos, artifacts of an earlier era. Bonus points if they're voip with shit sound quality and wonderful echos like the one on my desk.

    My point is the opposite of the article. Social graces in the tech field aren't that important, or shouldn't be anyway. If it's customer or public facing, yea. If it's folks you work with ever day, this prim and proper thing sounds like a flashback to the 1950s. Let's whip out the suit and tie and get the ladies to serve us coffee and do the typing for us, like the good old days. Tech standards change over time, as do social standards. If the higher ups are all folks like the author of the article suggests, what future does that company have? Innovation certainly doesn't live there.

  42. This has all happened before, and it will allAGRH! by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    Baby Boomers are just fine, in fact I know several of their parents, even they can use Linux! I call them The Lucky Few". Gnome has mouse "drag and drop" threshold that keeps them from accidentally copying folders and files with their shaky hands...

    I've volunteered to teach Computer Literacy for years at Community Centers -- since I was a teen. So, I've got quite a bit of experience as a Gen X'er to hand down to the Gen Y folks, and it's this:
    Baby Boomers are the least of your worries. As Gen Y, you must be prepared to deal with Generation Z.
    So, get your Z-Day kit in order -- It's like a hurricane kit, but with more shotguns.
    Do what you know you have to do. Malls are not safe-houses. The freeways will be tasty flesh bottlenecks.
    Check your friends and loved ones for bite marks. Remember, if she's got teeth marks, she's not your grandmother anymore.

  43. Re:Whatever happened to merit? by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    But to be honest, everyone should agree and realize it's not your merits that get you jobs and promotions. It has always been and always will be WHO you manage to befriend, and WHO'S family you were born into.

    That's not honest, that's defeatist. Not all companies are that way. If you find yourself working for people like that, it's time to go.

    That if you work hard at where you're at, you can be seen as 'you best fit here' so the bosses will pass you over for promotion because they figure your replacement will be worse.

    Seriously? Where do you people work? I want to be as far away from there as possible. Office Space is just a movie.

  44. Really? by brwski · · Score: 1

    People hire GenY kids? Insanity.

    --

    brwski
    "Because without beer, things do not seem to go as well''

  45. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by xaxa · · Score: 1

    When browsing through my list of emails, I'd rather see the first line of content than a bunch of hi's.

    Isn't that a fault with your email client? I think the salutation is useful as it sets the tone of the email: "Dear Xxxx" is different to "Hi Xxxx", "Hey Xxxx", "Xxxx" and "Dear Sir/Madam". I write one most of the time, but if I'm replying rapidly in an email discussion I'll omit it.

    If you're signature is prepended with "-- " on a blank line, the email client should cut it off when someone replies. Most also grey it out, or similar.

  46. Strong Work Ethic by __Paul__ · · Score: 2

    As an example, when we graduated college, our rite of passage into the accounting, law, consulting, engineering, and other similar professions was to work eighty hours a week

    I'm a contractor. If you want me to work eighty hours a week, you will be paying me for eighty hours a week.

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
  47. Seniority being the key word by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have seen many many organizations when I was consulting. Some were startups filled with people generally of a narrow age range (that of the founders) and old organizations where the bulk of the upper management were boomers. But nearly every organization that I worked with had the same thing happening. They were confronting a wave of technology that was changing everything. The boomers were having serious problems with this; at best they might latch onto a BlackBerry and think that they were leaping into the 21st century. A typical example though was the 20 something salesman who could make technology sing. The result was that he could outsell a 60 something by a significant multiple. The 20 something would pull over to a cafe and copy and paste his way to a great proposal that was sitting on the client's desk 40 minutes after they had met. He might return to the office with a marked up proposal and conclude the deal by the end of the week. The boomer on the otherhand would be lucky to have the proposal ready by the end of the week. So after a few rounds of this the boomer would start to get antsy about the 20 something; so he would play the "Seniority" card. Start trying to change the rules saying that the 20 something can't be flinging proposals all over the place without giving him time to "review" them.

    I can give a specific example where a single fresh out of university salesman outsold the other 11 salesman combined. He had been put in a crap area where they thought his average sale would be around $10,000-$30,000. So they put him on a small base salary with a 30% commission. His average sale(he made many) was actually around $500,000 and they refused to pay out the commission. They said it wouldn't be fair to the other salesmen and that he would get the same 6% that they did. Oddly enough he took this for a few years but left in the end.

    So what I have seen over and over is a pattern of boomers who seem to think that highly qualified 20 somethings are arrogant whereas their mistreatment of them is not. The beauty of this is that the qualified 20 somethings usually figure out that they are being mistreated and move into organizations filled with other non-boomers who want talent not arrogance.

    But the most amusing situation is when the reverse happens. When a young company filled with young people accidentally hires a boomer. Often the boomer has left something like the telephone company or a Nortel and immediately sets to work trying to make the dynamic young company into a remake of their old stodgy company. One of the first symptoms is the previously unused words "Org-chart".

    But I have seen a few examples of where young and old worked together extremely well. The typical situation was that you have a boomer who has zero interest in the day to day running of the company and all they care about is money. So they go out and raise the money from their fellow (well capitalized) boomers and let the young people do what ever the hell it is that they do.

    But this last if very little different in perception but entirely different in outcome when you have a well capitalized boomer try to run a company of 20 somethings. The usual symptom here is that the boomer is completely incapable of learning the nuances of what is going on. So you have a technology company that should be releasing a new product every 2 months but instead is bogged down by the boomer grinding development to a halt while he deals with another boomer marketing company that will debate for months which shade of blue the background should be.

    Now the above experience covers technology. In non technology companies this is where the boomers' capital trumps all. This would be the boomer coffee shop owner trying to be hip and cool, hiring a bunch of hipsters, paying them minimum wage, and driving to wine parties in his brand new leased BMW. No communication problems their, you kiss his ass you find another job.

    1. Re:Seniority being the key word by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can give a specific example where a single fresh out of university salesman outsold the other 11 salesman combined. He had been put in a crap area where they thought his average sale would be around $10,000-$30,000. So they put him on a small base salary with a 30% commission. His average sale(he made many) was actually around $500,000 and they refused to pay out the commission. They said it wouldn't be fair to the other salesmen and that he would get the same 6% that they did. Oddly enough he took this for a few years but left in the end.

      As the CEO of Avis once said, "That's what you want to happen, stupid."

      Something similar happened to Ross Perot at IBM. He was on commission, and one year he made more than the CEO of IBM. Then IBM imposed an annual cap on commissions. He hit his cap in late January, and wondered what to do with the rest of the year. So he started EDS and became a billionaire.

    2. Re:Seniority being the key word by macsuibhne · · Score: 1

      Didn't Perot spin EDS out of General Motors?

      --
      -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" -- Juvenal
    3. Re:Seniority being the key word by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Magical. I think this comes from some misfiring in some people's brains of their "Fairness" circuit. I have been here for 20 years so it is not "fair" that the new guy who runs circles around me gets more money, in fact, it is not "fair" that they even let him run circles around me. They should put limits on how many customers he can call per day. The horrible problem is that in these situations it is often the guy who is envious who is also BBQ buddies with someone else who can set policy. So suddenly things like your IBM story happen.

      A happier story was a guy I know was part owner of a company bought out by a large old company. Part of the deal was that he would work there as a "Senior Software Architect" so they bring him in with a group of new employees where he has to learn the company's song. He walks up to the HR guy and tells him, "I won't learn your stupid song, to make it clear, I won't do anything that isn't directly involved in being a Senior Software Architect." Long story short they tried to bully him but in the end just bought out his year. There was one moment in the process where he put his fingers in his ears and said over and over, "I'm not listening".

      I am certain that in the above company that when they brought in a new CEO that he didn't have to learn the company song.

    4. Re:Seniority being the key word by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      It depends. If I knew a person will actually stick fingers in his ears and not listen, it's almost certainly childish behavior on his part. People with better people skills and *finesse* would have much better ways to handle the situation.

      Or maybe he intended to just cash out and leave without putting up with the bullshit, and still not be seen as breaking the terms of the deal....

      As for new CEOs, well, supposedly the CEO can change the corporate culture and it's "song", but sometimes it takes great effort to do so, and when they fail, they get replaced. It's easier to work against the rules when you're at the top, but it's not necessarily a trivial task.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    5. Re:Seniority being the key word by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit predjudiced by being considered as valid prey by such types, but I've always considered sales a very shallow field where years of experience do not necessarily help a great deal.
      In other less shallow fields the "here's one I prepared earlier" situation becomes more relevant with time. A spectacular example is the people who were working on x-ray diffraction decades ago, back before DNA was found, suddenly being able to apply those years of what seemed like obsolete skills directly to Transmission Electron Microscopy. It's bloody hard to be able to think of a lot of different types of atoms in three dimensions but those people had already put in the years to be able to do it quickly.

    6. Re:Seniority being the key word by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      His point was that he wasn't in daycare and didn't need to learn their song in order to work well with others and produce awesome code. So he told them that if they were going to treat him like he was 5 he would act like he was 5. Plus he knew that they would not bend to him and just buy him out. The other two who sold stuck it out and I think went a little bit insane.

  48. Re: Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by mrbester · · Score: 1

    One thing I've noticed is people seem to have a pathological fear of the Delete key. Some cascade fuck of an email appears in your inbox and *every single* one line comment has all the headers before it and the corporate bullshit boilerplate under it (plus, this being Outlook, it's in *fucking reverse order*).

    And don't get me started on the "+ " bollocks. We have collaborative software for that. Bloody use it.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  49. Re:Also... by shentino · · Score: 1

    Because it's THEIR lawn and they don't HAVE to give YOU a job.

    Whoever pleases THEM best gets at the front of the line, and if you're desperate for work you should learn to respect the authority of whoevers lawn you're tracking mud on.

    It's not really fair, but considering the social backlash going on these days, respect for those in power even on a private level might not be such a bad idea just on strategic grounds.

  50. Re:Work Hard? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    By "every generation" you mean "every generation before there were hippies."

    How many percent of the population in the hippies period actually qualified as hippies?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  51. nt by shentino · · Score: 1

    IF they're your boss THEN you talk to them however they damn well tell you to.

  52. Re:Work Hard? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Cartman's definition of Hippie: If you say you want to change the world, but really only smoke pot and smell bad, you are a hippie!

    Hornwumpus' addition: If you know any other definition you ARE a hippie.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  53. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    When browsing through my list of emails, I'd rather see the first line of content than a bunch of hi's.

    Isn't that a fault with your email client? I think the salutation is useful as it sets the tone of the email: "Dear Xxxx" is different to "Hi Xxxx", "Hey Xxxx", "Xxxx" and "Dear Sir/Madam". I write one most of the time, but if I'm replying rapidly in an email discussion I'll omit it.

    If you're signature is prepended with "-- " on a blank line, the email client should cut it off when someone replies. Most also grey it out, or similar.

    Did a quick test, I didn't see this behaviour. Did you have any more information on this?

    I have my signature with email address because internal to our company Lotus Notes uses a completely different email address format, so this way if my email gets forwarded by someone in my company, to someone external, the external person will have my contact information if they need it.

    A practice I've changed is on voicemail greeting, cutting it to a minimum: "You have reached xxx, leave a message." People know they dialed the right number, and they are prepared for an upcoming beep. By now people understand what voicemail is, that they got it because I wasn't available, and that they should say who they are and why they're calling, and that when they are done they can hang up. I also don't understand people within my company that leave the time they called. Didn't they notice that the system tells you what time the message was left?

    A trend I've seen, which was a directive at the last company I worked at, is compressing signature information on one line

    Linuxis Garbage | Senior Troll | Internet Inc | Desk 212-867-5309 | Cell 646-867-5309

  54. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    Whole companies aren't immune from the plague, either. I worked at a firm where the annual employee evaluation form had checkboxes in the "reason for salary increase" section that included the option: "Merrit". I think everyone would agree with me that that's a bit of a red flag.

    Surely when you are merrit you need more money for your family?

  55. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Surely when you are merrit you need more money for your family?

    Hadn't thought of that: the importance of being Merrit.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  56. Re:Work Hard? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself. I tell my kids how much drugs I did and how much ass I got. I encourage them they can get as fucked up (literally and figuratively) as they want as long as they invite me along. They're fucking squares, man. Maybe I can adopt kids that like to party.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  57. Still irrelevant when Gen Y is in management by jpuddy · · Score: 1

    Thanks, but this is still largely irrelevant for many of us. What I need more often these days is advice on how I (the gen Y) can more effectively manage the Baby Boomers who work for ME. I'd like to help them along before they become victims of "efficiency".

  58. Me at my home computer: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    17 inch CRT. Check.
    Wired ball mouse. Check.
    Pot belly. Check.
    Graying hair. Check.

    I resemble that remark!

    1. Re:Me at my home computer: by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wired ball mouse. Check.

      I thought such animal cruelty was banned :)

    2. Re:Me at my home computer: by Hartree · · Score: 1

      What PETA doesn't know... ;)

  59. Sound advice: by Hartree · · Score: 2

    Indeed. Anime will get you branded as a pedophile creep.

    Keep it professional and put up soft core furry porn instead.

    1. Re:Sound advice: by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      Where do you work, Bad Dragon?

    2. Re:Sound advice: by Hartree · · Score: 1

      No. Anything to do with Bad Dragon would be hard core furry porn.

      Trust me.

  60. In Other Words by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

    Don't piss us off

  61. I'll go with Henry Kissinger's suggestion by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    "'Your excellency' will do."

    Dr. K's response when asked how he should be addressed after becoming Secretary of State.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:I'll go with Henry Kissinger's suggestion by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile reality showed he was far less than excellent. Some of the Nixon tapes involving Kissinger make very interesting listening about how absurdly out of his depth he was when dealing with anyone outside of Europe (most notably Asia, but where he was standing is also on that list). I wonder if inger is German for anus, because he certainly did not get there on merit.

    2. Re:I'll go with Henry Kissinger's suggestion by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Mention Nixon or anyone from his administration in a /. post and you're guaranteed to surface an anti-Nixon troll. How's life under the bridge?

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    3. Re:I'll go with Henry Kissinger's suggestion by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Personally I think Nixon had a lot more going for him than Kissinger or Ford.

  62. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by dkf · · Score: 1

    It's a note? So, not a box of chocolate or a flaming bag of dog poop contained digitally therein?

    You correspond with some of the people I used to deal with I see.

    And if it's cc'd to a whole department, that time loss and irritation multiplier gets . . . multiplied.

    I don't mind those; being sent to everyone allows me to filter much more rapidly, as I can rely on someone else having read it.

    And for the sake of disclosure, in case you hadn't already guessed it, the most frequent criticism of my communication style is "long-winded". Followed by "pompous jackass".

    Try focusing on saying things only once rather than many times over (or only partially). Most communications benefit from not being over- or under-used.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  63. Re:Work Hard? by dkf · · Score: 1

    Every generation says to their children: "we were better mannered, we didn't have premarital sex, we didn't have teenage sex, people didn't do drugs, we worked harder...". Apparently, they also had shorter memories

    The problem with the memories is probably due to all the drugs they were taking.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  64. How even Star Wars obsession looks by dbIII · · Score: 2
    From "In the thick of it":

    "The one about the fucking space hairdresser and the cowboy. He's got a tinfoil pal and a pedal bin. His father's a robot and he's fucking fucked his sister. Lego. They're all made of fucking lego."

  65. Not true by aepervius · · Score: 1

    If getting old was equivalent to getting experienced , then i would agree with you. The truth is, most folk which were older than me when I was a youngling (2 to 3 time my age), did not knew shit, they did not learn from all their year, they were just ensconced in their way. Some people are just getting those opportunity to learn and experience go past them and slide away from them. Many "older" (the majority IMNSHO) folk are not wise, they are just riding the "older folk are wiser" old meme. The few which really DID have experience to give, I learned from. Now I can say without arrogance, many of my older colleague and the newer colleague generation sees me as a problem solver/helper, and i am not even busting my ass.

    Older does not mean more experienced.

    Get that meme out of your system. Most older folk are just plain old. Not wise. That is not something you acquire automagically with age. Wisdom is something you already had when youw ere young, and willing to cultivate.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  66. Re:Whatever happened to merit? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    insisting that people with 5x your experience do things "your way" is about as dicky as you get

    It sucks when you have to do that due to software changes or other reasons to change procedure that render some of that extra experience irrelevant.

  67. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird strips out "-- " and anything following it when I reply. Outlook doesn't -- that's a shame, I think it used to.

  68. Re:Same as always by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

    I'm a homosexual and I don't even consider 'gay' or 'fag' to be offensive; I use them all the time in a derogatory manner.

  69. Re:Really? by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

    How else are we supposed to get out of our parents' basements?

  70. OMG by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Like, you know, these articles always like to lay out GenY (and GenX) as like you know some horrible types of people. But dude/bro remember, unlike yo baby boomer ass self and your gramps. Companies don't show loyalty. They shouldn't expect it either.

    And when baby boomer bro and grampa dude be using incomplete sentences and acting like dicks. But not providing any perks like they got (ie: 30 hours, no benefits, or 60 hour contract worker let go at any moment). Don't expect these younger generations to have loyalty back.

    ***

    Sorry... I am not a part of Generation Y. But most people I know who are Generation Y work hard, with little complaint. They've gotten a bum ride. Bad economy, flipping burgers with a bachelors, and are being left with three generations of debt. Few ask for handouts. But many dislike infringement into their personal life. We made it all about the dollar. So their attitude is basically, "I don't trust you. I work. You pay. That's the end of it." And that's not their fault. That's the fault of baby boomers, and gramps.

    And if they seem to not care about sending you a decent message. It might be because you're not paying them a decent wage.

  71. Thank you sir... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    For being a brilliant man....

    Seriously, this is the right attitude. And you know what, we young'ions have a lot we can learn from those who have more experience. They can tell us how to avoid mistakes, both ones they avoided and ones they failed to avoid. Then we if we're wise, may find ways to avoid those same mistakes. Or we decide to build tools to avoid them and sell them to everyone else.

  72. Re:Same as always by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    The point about current idiot speak usage of "fag" and "gay" is that they don't mean "homosexual".

    "That's so gay" means :"that is crappy/stupid"

    and "you fag" means "you loser" not "you homosexual".

    That's what's offensive.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  73. Wow, pretty ignorant by cundare · · Score: 1

    I didn't see much in this article that supported the headline. Sending emails instead of texting your boss? In a post-SarbOx world, why would anyone think differently? My impression is that this is an article written for really friggin' dumb kids who don't know how to act in a professional environment. Condescending and patronizing, but in a nice way. Remove the "don't" advice, leaving only the "do" advice, and you have guidelines that would have applied since "Mad Men."

  74. Re:as loudly .... Close the Business Schools! by bbsalem · · Score: 1

    I am well past 60. I grew up in a time when behaving in public and respecting your elders was important and expected. You not only deferred to older people, you went out of your way to respect them. I think that change and innovation have trumped experience too much. Many of us older people are regarded by the young as obsolete because we don't know the newest fads and lingo.

    The problem you are describing is the Young Turk problem that has been with us for a long time, but it is exaggerated by the illusion that the new is necessarily better, and that recent experiments have always been a success. One success that has been a dismal failure is training business management in business schools. This poisons the minds of sr. and middle management with financialization thinking and they forget that they are providing a service and mistreat their customers and staff.

    Like a boot camp for business, having to come up through the ranks rather than being full of yourself via academic and professional degrees, is a source of much of the disconnect as is the fast-paced social and entertainment media that dominates public life.

    But the irony is that I don't exonerate my generation, now grey and old, because we *ucked up and created much of the mess. We thought that you didn't have to pay your dues, that having new ideas was better, and now every body pays. I raised four children, now in that cohort born after 1980 and they treat me with some respect not because I demand it from them but because they learned that life is hard and challenging and that my take on it is valuable. They don't ask for much advice from me but they see that what has happened to me informs them, gives them much perspective. They know how to speak to me.

  75. Re:Really? by Holladon · · Score: 1

    You do realize that there are many members of Gen Y in their 30s, right?

  76. IOW Learn how to communicate:-)) by rhalstead · · Score: 1

    One of the important skills that seem to be lacking in the past generation or two and particularly college grads is communications. Forget the abbreviations and slang, they are poor at almost any form of communication except for short thoughts. Even when I was in college ( I graduated in 1990), most students hated writing, even if they could compose it on a keyboard. It was bad enough the university implemented a program called "Writing across the curricula . Many had problems articulating an idea at its basic level in a properly configured sentence, let alone handle a subject complicated enough to require multiple sentences and paragraphs. Interpersonal communications with individuals likewise handicapped went well at a basic level. However one of the most important skills a student can possess is being able to put complex thoughts and ideas onto paper or a screen. I was a project manager with a degree in CS. Most of my job consisted of planning and coordinating the work of others. Except for the weekly and biweekly face-to-face meetings virtually all my communications was via e-mail, or written documents. You want a raise? Convince me in a 100 words or less in a clear and concisely written document that you are worth it. I have 20 or more individuals and a set amount for raises that's only large enough that I can give decent raises to 3 or 4 employees. Spread farther and they amount to little more than "Attaboys!" You can be one of the best students in your field subjects, but if you can't write a proper resume you will never get the chance to prove it as it is unlikely to make it past the "round file" in HR.

  77. Seinfeld quotes by AndrewRonstadt · · Score: 1

    My boss asked me to come in a little early tomorrow, my response: "I'm having a boil lanced mañana, and if I fail to give at least one mañana's notice they bill me for the appointment..."

  78. "How Gen Y Should Talk To Old People At Work" by liamoohay · · Score: 1

    Not calling everyone born before 1980 "old people" might be a good start...

  79. Re:Work Hard? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    Every generation says to their children: "we were better mannered, we didn't have premarital sex, we didn't have teenage sex,

    My parents were married at 18. I was born 7 months after the marriage.

    bloody irresponsable I call it.

    Lucky for you though.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  80. Re:Copying Email Formats - No Thanks by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    You need a good hard nooner

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  81. Re:Same as always by Holladon · · Score: 1

    Oh, well then if you're gay and you say so, it MUST be okay!

    Just like women can't be guilty of sexism and black people never internalize racism.

  82. Not even when texting. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    don't ask them things like 'R U going?' in a non-texting medium."

    If you send me a text like that, you'll get a "govorit Angleskii, perzhalste" in return.

    (It means "speak English, please", mangled to suit Slashdot's incomprehensions of non=Latin characters.)

    Now, get off my lawn.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  83. I'm getting tired of the boomers by Monsuco · · Score: 1

    As someone from Gen Y, I'm getting tired of being lectured to by aging boomers. In their opinion, my generation is narcissistic and entitled though the boomers, in general, seem to be the most narcissistic of all the generations. If you want to talk about who is "entitled" then lets talk about entitlements. Polling data shows GenY'ers are the most open minded of all voting generations towards entitlement reform while boomers are generally adamant that nothing ever be done to Social Security or Medicare until they go bankrupt (and a good chunk of the boomers I talk to also adamantly deny the programs are in trouble, no matter how obvious the math is). I'm also told my generation is materialistic despite the fact that GenY, which is growing up in the post 08 economic crash, is possibly the most frugal generation since the greatest generation who grew up during depression and war.

  84. Ah Accents by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Be carefull about accents as paul Graham found it can get you into a lot of trouble - and dont for get to me your all uppity colonials :-)

  85. Absolutely. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I have never flipped a burger in my life. I am hopelessly under-trained in that field of human expertise.

    If in the other hand if you need a technologist that has worked in multiple countries, a piano player (at quite a decent level) or a film director & producer (credits on request) please let me know.

     

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  86. When the economy is shit ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... people think only short term.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  87. Re:as loudly .... Close the Business Schools! by anubi · · Score: 1

    The poignant thing to me is that it was the young baristas who went out of the way to make sure my Starbucks experience was a good one.

    It was the people who had executive/management responsibility that struck me as not giving a damn about the customer's experience. They gave me every indication they considered the Starbucks experience more in terms of salary, career advancement, retirement plans, and travel with people like me that was spending a hard-earned $5 for a cup of coffee as just a means to an end. Expendable. Dime-a-dozen. Just the end product of a marketing blitz. Seemed like a kid with a rental car - see how much you can nickel and dime a customer before he leaves. Pissed off. Customer satisfaction is marketing's job. When earning executive salaries, customers don't count. Only thing they seemed to care about was 50 cents extra for sweetener.

    I sensed a feeling that suited-and-tied marketing professionals were thought of as being worth quite a bit, but customers are just floor-trash, just something to be exploited as much as they would stand - with the executives running statistics on just how much exploitation people will take before they leave. Like a lab experiment of EE students finding out how much current a wire will take before it melts.

    If I had my way, I would have immediately switched the baristas to the executive role, and vice versa - benefits and all. The baristas knew how to build a business. The executives were just tearing it down. They never seemed to teach the psychology of building a customer relationship in any of their high-falutin' business schools.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]