Slashdot Mirror


Official: Microsoft To Acquire Nokia Devices and Services Business

Many submitted, and symbolset emailed me to wake up, sending this bit of interesting news out of Redmond: "Microsoft Corporation and Nokia Corporation today announced that the Boards of Directors for both companies have decided to enter into a transaction whereby Microsoft will purchase substantially all of Nokia's Devices & Services business, license Nokia's patents, and license and use Nokia's mapping services. Under the terms of the agreement, Microsoft will pay EUR 3.79 billion to purchase substantially all of Nokia's Devices & Services business, and EUR 1.65 billion to license Nokia's patents, for a total transaction price of EUR 5.44 billion in cash. Microsoft will draw upon its overseas cash resources to fund the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to approval by Nokia's shareholders, regulatory approvals and other closing conditions." And, yep, Elop is part of the deal (quoting Ballmer): "Stephen Elop will be coming back to Microsoft, and he will lead an expanded Devices team, which includes all of our current Devices and Studios work and most of the teams coming over from Nokia, reporting to me."

535 comments

  1. Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A classic Trojan horse manouver pulled off in style by Steven Elop. Now he can go back to Redmond, where they'll hold a Triumph in his honor.

    1. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful
      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by gigaherz · · Score: 0

      That seems to be their goal and intention. They only lack their own Steve Jobs as the brand's face.

    3. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So apart from the vision, agility, quality, execution, origination of new ideas, brand recognition, marketable "face", and retail presence, they are the new Apple.

      Gotcha.

    4. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Rational · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. The quip about "two turkeys not making an eagle" is applicable here.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    5. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the conspiracy theory is now cemented. Impossible to prove or disprove, and just too likable to not believe.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    6. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A long time Finnish stock analyst wonders the same (on the record)

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/terokuittinen/2013/09/02/nokia-sells-handset-business-to-microsoft-at-a-shockingly-low-price/

    7. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Nokia was going no where with Symbian. you really think Symbian would have saved Nokia in today's market?

    8. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Therad · · Score: 1

      Apple II?

    9. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Symbian? Probably not. Meego? Definitely.

    10. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As god is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!

    11. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh bullshit. First of all when it comes to MSFT pretty much ALL of their successes in the past can be preceded by "and then the other guy did something REALLY dumb" thus giving MSFT a free shot, from BE-OS tying itself to one niche CPU after another to netscape putting out the abomination that was NS4 not once did MSFT "come up with some brilliant plan" they just got lucky and were able to capitalize on having a competitor that was a moron.

      Second of all Nokia WAS ALREADY TOAST by the time the board called in Elop, they had not one, not two, but THREE OSes, not one of which was up to the task of competing with Android and iOS, the ONLY place they were ahead was in dumbphones which was like being the biggest 8-track manufacturer in 1987, they couldn't go with Android because not only was the Android market then as now the most cutthroat commodity market in mobile (only HTC and Samsung has made any real money and I'd argue they are on borrowed time, Hong Kong was showing off dual core Android phones that retail for $70 not 4 months ago so like PCs its gonna be profits measured in pennies) but Samsung and HTC frankly would have curbstomped them as nobody does high end Android units better, and they just didn't have the money to compete with HP for WebOS which IMHO would have been the best choice. Add in the fact that a couple of Maemo devs were quoted as saying Maemo wouldn't have been ready for another year and a half MINIMUM (it was having serious memory corruption and CPU issues at the time) and the app devs wouldn't have made shit for maemo anyway after Nokia burnt their bridges to the community by changing the framework? yeah there really wasn't any choice, it was take WinPhone or close the doors and give the money back to the shareholders.

      All those that hate MSFT frankly ought to be dancing in the street, as this gives ballmer the chance to piss away...what? 9 billion US dollars? And while shitting away a mountain of money Ballmer's retarded attempt to turn Windows into a WinPhone is frankly killing the Windows desktop, talking to other shop owners we have all even stopped carrying Win 8.x anything as its a bigger bomb than WinME, and finally you KNOW that Ballmer is gonna push hard for his little yes man Elop to get the big chair because it will let him still push his "vision" which consists of burning the desktop and server business to the ground so he can push half assed Apple clones that are worse in every way compared to the real thing, worse walled garden, worse performance, worse app selection, everything mobile under Ballmer/Elop has been half assed and piss poor and I don't see that changing if Elop gets the big chair.

      But I leave you all here with a warning, be careful what you wish for. So many wanted MSFT dead for being douchebags they aren't even noticing they are replacing one douchebag for an even worse one, Between the big brother levels of data that Google is gathering on every android user and the fact that their new ChromeBooks took what SHOULD have been a completely bog standard X86 laptop and made it so proprietary that the ONLY way to install a different OS is to throw it into "Dev mode" and then and ONLY then can you install not whatever you want, but only one of a handful of Linux distros supported by some guy in his basement? say what you want about MSFT but at least i could grab any Windows desktop or laptop and be booting to install not only any previous MSFT OS but pretty much any other OS, Linux,BSD,Haiku, whatever, in under 20 minutes.

      So while we all know where this is gonna end, another shitpile of money pissed away, declining sales on the X86 front and flatline numbers in mobile for MSFT, lets not replace one asshole company for another shall we? as for Nokia...oh well, between Samsung, HTC, LG, and a bazillion Chinese brands there really isn't a place for Nokia anymore now that the dumbphone market is dead. Hell when I was shopping for my Android phone several of the shops had refurb android phones starting at just $20 and new for $50, with prices THAT low for smartphones? Nokia might as well pack it in, no point in even making dumbphones anymore.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget to score one for conspiracy theorists. If you filter out the shills, Slashdotters (and all those who sold nokia shares the day after the burning platform memo, and they were not few) saw that coming from day one.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    13. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by theskipper · · Score: 1

      So you're favoring "Microsoft Gets Elopped" over "Nokia Gets Ballmered"?

      Both may turn out to be valid.

    14. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

      Considering Elop successfully tanked Nokia's stock, I would say mission accomplished.

    15. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Symbian was definitely dying. But would Nokia have fared as poorly if it had gone for Android and Meego? It's hard to say.

      With Android, Nokia would have been competing against all of the other Android vendors. That's an extremely difficult thing to do - aside from Samsung, and Motorola which is bankrolled by Google, the other Android device vendors are struggling. But that way at least Nokia would have been using the most popular mobile operating system. By using Windows Phone, Nokia was still competing against all of the Android vendors and also was handicapped by having an unpopular mobile operating system. In return for that, they got more input on what Microsoft did with Windows Phone and a nice cash infusion.

      It's possible the company was fucked regardless, and anything Nokia could have done to save itself should have been started three or five years before Stephen Elop took over.

    16. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Yeah putting all your eggs in one basket was a winning strategy...

    17. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK Potsy... People still supported Nokia - they had a huge market. Killing off their OSs for Windows effectively killed their market - check what market analysts were saying at the time. Feature phones make alot of money and are stepping stone to smartphones.

    18. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's one way to look at it.

      The other way to think about it is that the rest of Nokia just unloaded a boat anchor of a mobile phone business and a horrific CEO onto Microsoft, with the added bonus of him possibly becoming CEO of that combined corporation.

      Or, if you prefer, "beware of Finns bearing gifts".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    19. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree Nokia was already toast.

      I think Microsoft is making their best possible move, given the situation. The future is mobile. There will always be servers, and there will always be desktops and laptops, but their share of the world market is diminishing. Phones are the future of computing, if Microsoft isn't a major player in that market in ten years they will be declining. They are a huge company with billions in the bank and billions in profit, they won't fall quickly. But if 90% of home users do most of their gaming on a tablet and most of their computing with a phone that uses MHL to plug into a monitor and bluetooth to connect the keyboard and mouse, then Microsoft will start to see its fortunes fade.

      The advantage with Android is that it's open source. Amazon has their own flavor of Android. Vendors in China have their own flavors of it too. If Windows Phone is ever killed, Microsoft could put out an Android core, compatible with Android apps, but with Bing for search and Nokia's Navteq for maps. Instead of having multiple competing mobile operating systems, you have one dominant mobile operating system with multiple competing proprietary layers on top.

      If Google's flavor of Android just becomes dominant, then I agree too that it's a serious problem. I think Google's behavior has shown that they're fundamentally no different from other big tech companies. They're open precisely until they get a dominant market position, and then they're closed in order to slam the door against the next set of innovators. Hence Google Plus has no open third party API - Google wants to suck users into their social network, not make it easier for Facebook (or the next Facebook, whatever that is) to suck users out.

    20. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by denzacar · · Score: 2

      Microsoft eloped with Nokia?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    21. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you have another explanation?

      From what I can see they sent in Elop to use Nokia to make WinPhone popular and if that failed were prepared to buy Nokia to keep it selling WinPhone.

    22. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And all they had to do was to ruin the great name of Nokia to get the price low enough for Microsoft. Then sell at a substantial loss.

    23. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      So apart from the vision, agility, quality, execution, origination of new ideas, brand recognition, marketable "face", and retail presence, they are the new Apple.

      Gotcha.

      And the roads. The roads go without saying.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    24. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Turkeys can fly but only for short distnces under their own power.

    25. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      > they had not one, not two, but THREE OSes, not one of which was up to the task of competing with Android and iOS
      Such things happen when you don't basically market your smartphones, not to the devs nor to the public. They had a head start and committed suicide. Nokia managers should have been lapidated- using a suitable amount of 3310 of course.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    26. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by durrr · · Score: 1

      They could've said "yeah we'll make android phones!" and seen their stock double instead of halve.

    27. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Not that successful. More like a Apple III.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    28. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by thaylin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well since when has apple had vision, agility, quality, execution, origination of new ideas? The last one sure, but MS has that as well.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    29. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by miknix · · Score: 1

      I'll be impressed if this passes regulation.. If it does, any chance of bringing this to European courts?

    30. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by plover · · Score: 1

      Feature phones make alot of money and are stepping stone to smartphones.

      Wrong. Feature phones make no money. About five years ago, a Chinese foundry released a cheap phone chipset enabling anyone to make feature phones for very low cost. Chinese factories can emit simple phones by the tens of thousands per shift for a few dollars each, and they became a commodity. Competition can't raise the price, so the only way to make money is through volume. And that benefits only factories.

      --
      John
    31. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by thaylin · · Score: 1

      labeled troll for telling the truth, awesome.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    32. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Since Jobs came back. So you might say well Jobs got lucky with the iPod. And the iPhone. And the iPad. Or you could say Apple knows what it was doing. MS had both smartphones and tablets for years before Apple. Windows Mobile is a memory now and Windows Tablets never sold well. If you want to ignore all that, Apple is still doing well in computers. Sure they don't have a high overall marketshare unlike Dell or HP or Lenovo. The main difference is that they are highly profitable in computers. Why? Because long ago they decided they were not going to fight those other three for the low margin, high volume parts of the market.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    33. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Oh bullshit. First of all when it comes to MSFT pretty much ALL of their successes in the past can be preceded by "and then the other guy did something REALLY dumb" thus giving MSFT a free shot,

      That's some rather revisionist history. Did MS competitors make mistakes? Yes, but lest you forget MS was convicted of abusing their monopoly. The evidence from the trial of how they threatened OEMs not to install Netscape certainly didn't help Netscape.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    34. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Nokia had lots of viable prospects to pull itself out of the nose-dive it was in.

      The conspiracy theorists are wrong for several reasons:

      1) Nokia was already flat-lining before Microsoft ever got involved;
      2) What the fuck sense would it make to "trojan horse" a company, destroy its value, and then buy it to continue pushing the same phones that 'ruined its value'?

      Do you think that Microsoft is going to suddenly go, "haha! sorry, we totally forgot, we have all these AWESOME phones and software people will want to buy, we just forgot to tell Nokia about them until Nokia tanked and became an irrelevant failure in the market we expect them to turn around and become a viable competitor in again!"

      Make no mistake: Microsoft needs Nokia - they need the expertise in mobile hardware that Nokia has. But Nokia also needs Microsoft - they dicked around without a strategy for too long while smartphones ate their profits, and now they need somebody to bring them a compelling software offering to pair with their hardware. Symbian/Meego/Maemo/etc. are non-starters. They are dead, as far as the market is concerned. Yes, there'll still be some idiotic FOSS hangers-on trying to make them into a thing, but they will never be a major profit center for Nokia. Android is Samsung & Google's game now - they're the only ones making any profits off it, for Nokia to jump into that fray would just mean that the weaker Samsung competitors (HTC et al) will cannibalize Nokia. Nokia needs Microsoft's platform, and Microsoft needs Nokia's hardware expertise. They could still both fail magnificently in the mobile space, but this is really their only reasonable chance at making a dent in that market.

    35. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Taking Nokia board's intent at face value, Elop was invited to do something to help the situation. Once they'd decided to concentrate on Windows Phone, they became so dominant on the platform that the other WP OEMs started having second thoughts. So Nokia's devices unit became a more and more attractive purchase target as it went along. Keeping the R&D diverse might have been a good hedge against that, but it does not look like a good business strategy to me: after all, companies exist to make money, not to shit into their books for the specific purpose of staying independent.

      Selling the unit to Microsoft might have been the plan B from the beginning, too. But I think it's naive to assume that Nokia's board and shareholders fell victim to the evil scheming M$.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    36. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by AVee · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Absolutely, I've been looking at buying an N9 at that time. Every review I read boiled down to the same thing, 'brilliant phone, but don't bother cause the platform is dead already'. It had lots of potential, but it never got a change. This was GSMArena's conclusion at the time:

      Beautiful. Simple. Brilliant. Out of place and hardly on time. Timeless. The Nokia N9 is a story with no happy ending but you want to enjoy every word. Sad story. Post-coital kind of sad.

      And that’s not because the Nokia N9 let us down. On the contrary, we found it to be a revelation: gorgeous design and the divine simplicity of the all-screen experience.

      If anyone is let down, it's the Nokia N9 itself. The platform is as good as doomed. Forsaken by its own creator. With Nokia giving up on MeeGo and a price tag that confines the N9 to a premium niche, it will be next to impossible for the OS to grow a substantial user base. Without users, developers won’t be too interested in MeeGo either. And the limited number of apps is the platform's biggest weakness.

      Google a few other reviews and they will all be along those lines. I didn't buy it because it was dead on arrival, I bet a lot of others did the same. And it's a shame because it could have been a great platform, especially because it was a fairly standard Linux system below the hood.

    37. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Just like... Beluzzo ruining SGI.

      Elop's return to MS is like Bizarro-world version of Jobs return from NeXT to Apple. He'll be CEO as MS in a year, and watch it plummet into the abyss, instead of define the new azimuth.

      Will he be the one to break up MS? Who knows. It's long overdue. One of those businesses could possibly excel....

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    38. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that's a perfect metaphor for this scenario.

    39. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you say.

      Microsoft eats anus juice.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    40. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by schnell · · Score: 1

      Why would Meego have turned around Nokia's fortunes where Symbian would not? There have been plenty of "alternative" mobile OSes launched already (Bada, Ubuntu Phone, Firefox OS, Windows Phone... hell - even BlackBerry is an "alternative" OS these days) but none have been much more than a blip on the big Android/iOS radar screen. Why would Meego have been different?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    41. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      As an owner of an n810 that now sits in my closet unused, more on that in a moment, I can say that Nokia had the people in place to shift gears to Android if they had chosen to do so. It would not have been a seemless transition from their own Linux platform to Google's Java encapsulated Linux platform but they would have remained much more of a core of what they are.

      My n810's platform was even gone by the time the 9xx series was out. They had a history of developing these great platforms and then leaving them behind in an effort to chase the market. The reason my n810 sits in my closet right now is not only because its battery is dead, but because that even if I were to get another battery for it (and it eats them up pretty good due to its pretty dated tech) but that there is no development for it. Nor has there been for a while now.

      Instead, and I'm gonna go into speculation mode here, but the board got bought out with MS money. Instead of looking at a company they were looking at their own self interest (a very common theme these days in business) and rather than working hard and trying to forge their way past the market issues that they were having they thought that it would be better just to get money that would secure their own, and by their I mean the very few who got the big checks that allowed this to happen, futures. And damn the company, those who worked for it, and everything else that it helped support. Hard work is for suckers right?

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    42. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by kirkb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read a little Tomi: http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/

      NOK was not even close to dead/dying when Elop was brought in. His 'burning platform' memo killed it.

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    43. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Elop successfully tanked Nokia's stock, I would say mission accomplished.

      Can you spot where in this Nokia 6-year stock graph that Elop took over?

    44. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by thaylin · · Score: 1

      I never said they were not doing well in some markets. Even in computers they are losing their quality, execution areas, the only thing that they did well there.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    45. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep:

      Prediction from Feb 2011.

      I should play the lottery... or maybe not as it was screamingly obvious.

    46. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything you say is ridiculous after saying MS only got lucky because Be-OS tied itself to a niche CPU. That is literally one of the most deluded things I've ever read. I ran Be-OS for a while and not ever did I ever feel there was a chance I could make it my main work OS, and I'm saying this as someone who pined for the old dual ppc powered beboxes. Get a grip, dude.

    47. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Turkey

    48. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Symbian OS was based on EPOC32. A PDA OS that in 1997 had a complete complement of touchscreen apps and a third party developer community. Had Telephony simply been added to what was already there at that time, they essentially had a decade lead on what Apple produced with the iPhone.

      However Nokia killed the existing top layers of Symbian OS because it didn't match their existing phone OS UI. The resulting mess was Nokia's own fault.

    49. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Tomi is an ex-Nokia exec, and has always overestimated Nokia's abilities, power and chances.

    50. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I agree in general. Buying Nokia is like buying a dying horse. Sure, maybe it will get you a few more miles, but at the end of the day the horse is still dying. Unless MS plans on using Nokia's patents to try to smack down competition, I fail to see how this will suddenly make them THE smart device manufacturer. And frankly, if Nokia's patents were that valuable, Nokia would have done it by now themselves.

      If Microsoft can't get anyone to buy Nokia devices with RT on them right now, how will buying Nokia better place Microsoft to take on Google and Apple?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    51. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

      I started reading wikipedia, and it looks like you have a point. Nokia was getting eaten alive by iOS and Android in 2010. But it was getting eaten alive slowly. Nokia didn't start rapidly hemorrhaging market share until they switched to Windows Phone.

      Thanks for the correction. Again, the company could still be in a downward spiral today if they weren't using Windows Phone. But it's possible I was overstating how weak their position was in late 2010.

    52. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Symbian kernel was a really beautiful design that was still ahead in terms of power management and security than anything else on the market. It was saddled with a userland and userspace APIs that were designed for when 1MB of RAM was about the limit for a phone and so handling resource constraints were more important than making life easy for programmers. Their solution? Replace the kernel with Linux.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    53. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Feature phones make alot of money and are stepping stone to smartphones

      Remember those graphs from a few years ago, comparing Apple and Nokia in market share and profit? They were almost exact mirrors: Apple had something like 80% of the mobile phone profits, Nokia had something like 80% of the market share. Feature phones these days are on razor thin margins. You can buy a cheap Android phone for under £50, and get one free on a low-end contract, so who is going to buy a feature phone? Android and the iPhone have brand recognition in the smartphone markets, but no one associated Nokia with it (well, geeks did, because we all remember the communicator and subsequent devices). Nokia never had mass-market smartphones, they segmented their market in a way that made it difficult to move from one tier to the next. Their smartphones had such different UIs to their feature phones that you may as well go with Android or iOS (which you've heard of) if you're going to buy a new smartphone to replace your old feature phone.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    54. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I thought turkeys could fly!

      I don't know about that... but they're really good at plummeting, if you drop them from high enough.

      --
      That is all.
    55. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Considering Elop successfully tanked Nokia's stock, I would say mission accomplished.

      Can you spot where in this Nokia 6-year stock graph that Elop took over?

      The question isn't exactly when he took over (9/21/2010), but when he started making big company destruction announcements (2/2011) - and that you can spot in the 6 year graph.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    56. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Why would Meego have turned around Nokia's fortunes where Symbian would not? There have been plenty of "alternative" mobile OSes launched already (Bada, Ubuntu Phone, Firefox OS, Windows Phone... hell - even BlackBerry is an "alternative" OS these days) but none have been much more than a blip on the big Android/iOS radar screen. Why would Meego have been different?

      MeeGo was about transferring what Nokia had on Symbian to a new platform. They supported developing both with Qt in a compatible way such that a simple recompile could move the application from Symbian over to MeeGo. Of course, they could have chosen to do the same thing with Android or Tizen (Bada/Ubuntu Phone/FireFox OS/etc didn't come until later), but they would have still had to integrated Qt into it, where Qt was a central component MeeGo from the get to.

      Instead, they dropped everything they did in favor of a platform that none of their existing Symbian developers had any kind of migration path to. So everyone had to go out and start from scratch, in which case, why not chose the dominant platforms (iOS and Android)?

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    57. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They go farther when frozen.

    58. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by jedwidz · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed how neatly you covered special cases like turkey airfreight and turkey jetpacks.

      In other news, I once saw a peacock fly ten metres straight up and perch in a tree when confronted by a boisterous dog. Didn't expect that.

    59. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Feature phones make alot of money and are stepping stone to smartphones.

      Wrong. Feature phones make no money.

      Please tell that to the many millions of people that bought apps for the Nokia Feature Phones, who used the Ovi store, etc. Nokia did very well in making money using Feature Phones for quite a while.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    60. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If you want an example in just computers: The MacBook Air. One way to look at it is it solves the same problem as net books. But instead of shrinking the whole computer in every dimension, Apple worked on the thickness. It is easier for most consumers to use a thinner keyboard as opposed to a smaller one. The original was purely dedicated for road warriors who wanted less weight but still be able to do some computing and the price reflected it. Now the Air is their basic consumer model as they have been able to mass produce them enough. In the days of the original Air, it would have been hard to make millions of them for consumers.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    61. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by plover · · Score: 2

      Please tell that to the many millions of people that bought apps for the Nokia Feature Phones, who used the Ovi store, etc.
      Nokia did very well in making money using Feature Phones for quite a while.

      Of course they did, and I never claimed otherwise. Nokia made money by the truck-full off of feature phones back in the 1990s and early 2000s. But those massive profits completely dried up five years ago. Nokia kept on making feature phones even after the cheap clone phones came out, and suddenly found they had to compete on price alone against a product that was perhaps $20.00 cheaper than their product. If your profit margin drops from $20.00 dollars per phone to $0.50 per phone, you have to run your very expensive factories for 40 times longer just to make the same amount of money you used to. You then have to try to sell 40 times as many phones to customers - but most of them would really rather have iPhones or Androids.

      Stockholders see that as "devaluation" and sell their shares. That means you have even less money to keep those expensive factories and salesmen working.

      The world changed, but Nokia didn't keep up. They made a deal with Microsoft and produced some really nice phones, but the marketplace has mostly ignored them as a Johnny-come-lately to the smartphone party.

      --
      John
    62. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering Elop successfully tanked Nokia's stock, I would say mission accomplished.

      Can you spot where in this Nokia 6-year stock graph that Elop took over?

      The question isn't exactly when he took over (9/21/2010), but when he started making big company destruction announcements (2/2011) - and that you can spot in the 6 year graph.

      Yeah, but looking at that graph it is a bit of a stretch to lay the tanking of Nokia's stock on Elop. That was already happening, big time. Would going for Android have been a more profitable choice? Maybe, but sure doesn't seems to be for HTC.

    63. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by allamericancomp · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is using same strategy then used with the pc market they try to be cheaper the everyone and make there software work on all platforms and it's not a strategy that's working. I think Microsoft is making their best possible move, given the situation. I mean they need to get some share of the marketspace this might e there best chance for it.

    64. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by thaylin · · Score: 1

      And was developed prior to 2k8, we are almost 2014. I never said that they did not at one point have vision, agility, quality, execution, origination of new ideas, however, what have they done lately.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    65. Re: Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia at the time Elop came on board was about to move to a bunch of Linux devices which would be probably superior to Android, and if all else failed the work could be reused for Android. (And easily run Android apps)

      Elop basically sacked or drove away or ticked off most of the people who make Nokia a world wide name. He trashed both teams on Symbian and Linux. For the smashing success of wp 7 and 8...

    66. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If you want to ignore small and large ideas: Retina display MacBook Pros. The new extremely thin iMac. The new Mac Pro. Not everything from Apple comes as one major change. Sometimes it is a series of small changes. For example the use of aluminum enclosures was only used in the MacBook Promand has now spread to their entire line.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    67. Re: Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia at the time Elop came on board was about to move to a bunch of Linux devices which would be probably superior to Android, and if all else failed the work could be reused for Android. (And easily run Android apps)

      Elop basically sacked or drove away or ticked off most of the people who make Nokia a world wide name. He trashed both teams on Symbian and Linux. For the smashing success of wp 7 and 8...

      Those Linux and/or Symbian devices would have had the same problem that is WP's main problem, lack of apps compared to Android/iOS. All the major developers and companies are prioritizing Android and iOS and don't have time for anything else. Superior devices doesn't help, if you don't have all the apps people have come to expect. A friend (really :) is a Lumia 920 user who _would_ have been very happy with the device except it doesn't have Instagram.. and many of the other must-have apps are minimal in features compared to the much better iOS/Android versions.

    68. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna disagree on the vision, quality, execution, and origination of new ideas half. I'd say Nokia's mobile division rivals (in execution) and bests (the rest) Apple in the rest in recent years. Apple did phenomenally with the original iPhone and introducing the world of consumers to the notion of appifying experiences, but since 2009 or `10, they haven't really innovated much, and have taken a fair amount time to adopt new technologies. Since then, Nokia's brought solid low-light cameras to market (still the only phones with good performance there), were the first manufacturer to include wireless charging, and had an attractive and clean hardware design to boot (Motorola and Samsung, I'm glaring at you).

    69. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia's stock was tanking long before Elop got there.

    70. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They claimed to support but nobody was buying new nokia phones.

    71. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was Nokia in a downward spiral when Tomi claims that Nokia was vastly profitable and were projected to get an increasing revenue for the projected future?

    72. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      There used to be a village nearby (ish) to where I grew up, in which there were some peacocks that just roamed freely around the roads. If one of them felt like strolling in front of your car, you just had to put up with it. I remember seeing the peacock had gone to roost in the tree by the pub for the night, which at the time seemed a bit notable but - now you mention it - I didn't really know they could fly. I've never actually seen one take off before or since but apparently if they feel like it, they can get up there... Weird.

    73. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have another explanation?

      From what I can see they sent in Elop to use Nokia to make WinPhone popular and if that failed were prepared to buy Nokia to keep it selling WinPhone.

      Nokia hired him you tard, what you think Microsoft can just put anybody they want as CEO of any company they want?

    74. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Google a few other reviews and they will all be along those lines. I didn't buy it because it was dead on arrival, I bet a lot of others did the same. And it's a shame because it could have been a great platform, especially because it was a fairly standard Linux system below the hood.

      Android is a fairly standard Linux system too, as was Maemo. Having yet another Linux phone is pretty pointless, the N900 was great but it really only appealed to geeks, it had some great capabilities but I found it kinda sucked as a phone and these days there's nothing it could really do that you can't do on an Android device anyway.

      The smartphone market is relatively mature now so emerging platforms need to offer something particularly disruptive, Meego, webOS, Windows Phone, Ubuntu Phone, etc... didn't and AFAICT FirefoxOS doesn't either (except maybe hitting the extreme low end). All those platforms (yes even Windows Phone) are very very good but the problem is they aren't significantly better than the incumbents in any way that would convince existing users to make the switch particularly with their vast app catalogs which many existing users have made significant purchases from.

    75. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read a little Tomi: http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/

      NOK was not even close to dead/dying when Elop was brought in. His 'burning platform' memo killed it.

      So why were they so desperate to hire a new CEO? If that blog post is true and Nokia were in fact flogging every other player in the market why did Nokia change? The CEO does *NOT* have absolute control of the company, the idiocy of that post is in the idea that one guy just came in, took over a highly profitable market-leader with nothing but huge profits on the horizon and single-handedly took it down while everybody else was powerless to stop him.

      Obviously an ex-Nokia executive doesnt want to admit that he had no vision and no plan for the future and would rather put the blame on one outsider. Nokia had some latent momentum but nowhere to go. His biggest problem is the idea that they were too big to fail.

    76. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by slinches · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used a N9? If any OS could be have been disruptive enough to overcome the duopoly of Android/iOS, MeeGo on the N9 was it. It still has simplest, most natural interface of any mobile device I've ever used and it accomplishes that without sacrificing any of the power or true multi-tasking capabilities of the N900. The only weakness in the platform at launch (besides very minor bugs) was the lack of apps. And that should have been only a temporary hurdle that would have resolved itself as other device manufacturers picked up MeeGo and the user base approached critical mass.

      If Nokia hadn't intentionally sabotaged their own product by releasing the device in limited markets and declaring the platform dead before release, every indication is that the N9 would have been a huge success. That alone may not have been enough to become a player on par with Apple and Google, but it certainly would have been a better start than Windows Phone has been so far.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    77. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Citation please? Otherwise I gotta call bullshit. Hell I live in one of the poorest rural states in the nation and you almost never see a dumbphone even around here, again because you can get an Android for $20. I can honestly say I have NEVER met anybody who has bought a single program for a dumbphone, not one, and I'm meeting new people constantly at the shop and we often talk about phones (as nearly everybody needs to be shown how to get their pics off the things) and nobody has been buying dumbphones for awhile now. Heck even India now has a dirt cheap Android and so does Africa, the dumbphone market really had nobody to sell to and no place to go but down.

      So I'm sorry but Nokia was toast long before Elop ever walked in the door, all they had was 8-track players in the era of the CD,and when you add to that the infighting, trying to support THREE OSes, none of which held a candle to iOS and Android, and the mess that was their smartphone division? Bad management had already blown a hole in that ship big enough to drive a semi through, all the patching by Elop simply couldn't undo the damage.

      But if you think dumbphones had any kind of future even then? I got a bridge you might be interested in. the ONLY users of dumbphones I've had walk through my doors for the past 6 years have been folks over 65 and they don't buy apps, hell they don't even browse, and they hang onto a phone until it dies. With the Chinese cranking out a SoC that lets them build dumbphones for less than $3 USD a pop? that market was dead dude, Elop was right on his "burning platform" memo because everybody could see the writing on the wall, no money to make in a phone that costs less to make than a meal at Mickey D's.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    78. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But you missed my point which was what choice did they have?

      They had ZERO experience in Android and Samsung and HTC would have curbstomped them in that market as they had the experience, the advertising, and they frankly make really solid products that folks like. They didn't have the mountains of money to burn to get WebOS which IMHO would have been the best choice but they couldn't get into a bidding war with HP and ever hope to win, Apple sure as fuck wasn't gonna license their sacred cow iOS to Nokia so they could compete, and their internal divisions were a mess with the ONLY product that had a snowball's chance in hell (both Symbian and the Java OS were designed for dumbphones and would have required a ground up rewrite) was maemo and several of the Maemo devs said it would be at LEAST a year and a half as Maemo had serious memory corruption and CPU usage issues. One dev even reported you had to reboot the phone at least twice a day or the OS would crash....who was willing to put up with that in 2010?

      So I don't see how they had any choice in the matter, the board waiting so damned long to try to change course that they were backed into a corner. The only market they had was dying, they didn't have a product to sell in the new market, all they could do was hire Elop and hope a Hail Mary pass would pull their collective asses out of the fire....it failed, but was it a bad call? I would argue that given what they had the answer is a giant NO IT WAS NOT a bad call, they did the best with what they had and it just wasn't good enough. The situation reminds me of what happened with Palm, as they kept milking Garnet until the market had passed them by and by the time they got WebOS out of the door nobody cared anymore as Android and iOS had drank their milkshake. In the 90s Nokia WAS a big name, key word WAS, but by the time that Elop was hired the only ones that gave a fuck about Nokia was some old geeks and FOSSies that remembered the good old days, everybody else had moved onto to Samsung and HTC and LG. They were stuck in the past and just couldn't catch up, that's all. But it wasn't a bad call, they just waited too damned long to make it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    79. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      You convinced me. (Just to be clear, no sarcasm intended.)

    80. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company with no momentum in mobile buying a company (well, parts of a company) that is losing momentum in mobile isn't exactly a recipe for success. Microsoft is better off going multiplatform with Office on mobile and getting the most out of its current strengths rather than slowly sinking the company trying to continue to get into new markets.

    81. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia had technologies that could be used in future plans - they had Qt, Maemo and the N9. The N9 was wildly successful despite the sabotage to the N9 marketing by Nokia's management. They could have used their Maemo OS that they've finished developing at that time but instead, it was decided that Maemo was not suitable as a phone OS simply because they haven't used it outside their little Internet tablet experiment and gambled on the idea that Microsoft's Phone OS would be a better direction for that.

    82. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used a N9?

      Yes, I have and it's a very good device.

      If any OS could be have been disruptive enough to overcome the duopoly of Android/iOS, MeeGo on the N9 was it. It still has simplest, most natural interface of any mobile device I've ever used and it accomplishes that without sacrificing any of the power or true multi-tasking capabilities of the N900. The only weakness in the platform at launch (besides very minor bugs) was the lack of apps.

      That's exactly the problem, I agree the N9 was very good, it worked well, but it wasn't that much better in any objective way and didn't have any feature that would appeal to the broad consumer-base as something so substantial and over-arching that they would give up their existing familiarity, app catalog and purchases to switch. Meego is no different to any of the other platforms.

      If Nokia hadn't intentionally sabotaged their own product by releasing the device in limited markets and declaring the platform dead before release, every indication is that the N9 would have been a huge success.

      Every indication is that it would be no different to webOS or FirefoxOS or Ubuntu Phone or Maemo, they work very well and very naturally but their unique benefits only speak to geeks.

      That alone may not have been enough to become a player on par with Apple and Google, but it certainly would have been a better start than Windows Phone has been so far.

      I doubt it, there's little objectively wrong with any of the alternatives but they are all 'me-too' platforms in a mature market.

    83. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by jedwidz · · Score: 1

      Worked for Apple.

      No wait, Apple's strategy is 'don't let anyone else put their eggs in your basket'.

      Or maybe, 'keep all your eggs in an unadorned platinum fruit bowl protected by a gorilla glass display case in the Smithsonian'.

    84. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Quite simply, M$ can now gut Nokia, shift all it labour requirement to China and seek to compete in price alone. Of course that also puts it into direct opposition to any other company wanting to produce a winphone, so M$ will abandon sales to other companies and go the route or totally ridiculous licence fees and via patents and the courts obstruct sales of competing products. It will do this for as long as it can regardless of losses. In the hopes if it sells enough cheap phones it can gain acceptance. Reality a complete court driven bog down in the sales of smart phones.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    85. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by jfanning · · Score: 1

      You do know that Tomi rewrites history and he himself pointed out that Nokia was screwed before Elop took over? He conveniently forgets that fact in his one man campaign against Elop.

      http://dominiescommunicate.wordpress.com/

    86. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by zyzko · · Score: 2

      N9 was moderately successful, but would Maemo have taken off as a competitor to Android and iOS markets? Hard to say - and Jolla might still give it a shot.

      But Maemo was far from ready, Nokias HW partner on Maemo (Intel) was (and still is) far from ready, and the whole thing was a management mess. Yes, it could have been fixed - maybe, but frankly Windows Phone was not that bad choice compared to Maemo at the time. The only thing that made N9 come out at all was because Maemo was axed, and the team got "let's show them" -attitude after the fact.

      For a nice (but long) history about Maemo / MeeGo read:

      http://taskumuro.com/artikkelit/the-story-of-nokia-meego

    87. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yes they abused that power but how did they GET that power? By having competitors that were MORONS. You seem to forget that the first major IE that had real share YOU HAD TO DOWNLOAD as it didn't even come with the OS, and this was in the days of 28k dialup so you had to REALLY want something to go to the trouble, yet people did by a LARGE margin, why? Because NS4 was a heaping pile of fail and shit, that is why!

      Believe me grasshopper, I've been in the PC business since the Shat was selling VIC20s with his TJ Hooker hair. I was surfing the boards back when you had to keep a book of IP addresses and frankly I was a BIG fan of NS...until NS4. I can tell you that it was almost comedic to use that browser and if it wouldn't have been "shoot your PC like Elvis" frustrating it would have been funny. Here is what it was like to use NS4..."Hey its installed, great! Okay I'll just go to my favorite hangout and...damn, crashed. Oh well it must have been a glitch I'll just reload and...crashed again. oookay, maybe it just doesn't like that website. I'll pick a different and...(entire PC BSODs)...FUUUUUCCCKKKK!

      Time after time I watched in shock as company after company did truly moronic moves that practically gave the market to MSFT, from the NS4 rewrite to IBM trying to buttfuck the OEMs and then with a straight face trying to get them to pay $199 a pop for licenses of an OS that IBM controlled, hell we are seeing it with MSFT itself now, with the entire planet screaming "WE FUCKING HATE METRO!!!" only for Ballmer to go "Oh really? Well here is a "start button" that takes you right back to metro, BWA HA HA...what do you mean sales are down?"

      Frankly if I were to cite every moronic move of the 80s and 90s that gave MSFT a free shot here it would be the length of War & Peace but I would argue their abuses were frankly pointless and a way for a paranoid MSFT to try to justify itself when in reality its competitors were either arrogant, stupid, or both. BTW notice that now they are stuck fighting Google and post Jobs Apple, both of which have shown they are anything BUT stupid, that MSFT has gone exactly nowhere in mobile? MSFT can't seem to do well unless the competitor does something dumb first, one can argue all day why that is but its really not hard to come up with citation after citation. hell look at the X360, had a billion dollar flaw and STILL ended up taking the top slot from Sony, why? Sony thought a $599 system would fly, and by setting the PS3 at that insane price point for the pivotal first 2 years gave MSFT a free pass.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    88. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yes they abused that power but how did they GET that power?

      You think MS learned all those dirty tricks overnight? Pfft. They pulled some rather underhanded things but not being a monopoly there were not under scrutiny and was beyond the period the US was investigating.

      By having competitors that were MORONS. You seem to forget that the first major IE that had real share YOU HAD TO DOWNLOAD as it didn't even come with the OS, and this was in the days of 28k dialup so you had to REALLY want something to go to the trouble, yet people did by a LARGE margin, why? Because NS4 was a heaping pile of fail and shit, that is why!

      That's some rather revisionist history as well. By the time of 95 OSR2, IE was included. Also by that time, it was harder to find Netscape installed by OEMs. IE was the default and I had to use it to get Netscape.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    89. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're like the new Apple if that jackass from Pepsi was still running Apple.

    90. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Hell I live in one of the poorest rural states in the nation

      I am not referring to the US. I am referring to places like the Pacific Rim, China, India, SWA - Nokia was extremely popular there even just a few years back, and their Symbian phones did very well. People used the Ovi store there. The rise of the Android phones there was occurring but its exponential rise in those locations was primarily due to the drop of Symbian by Nokia ala Elop.

      Now, in the US - yeah, Nokia was almost non-existent.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    91. Re: Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peacocks are excellent aeronaughts, even the male with their large tail.
      They are the largest members of the pheasants, all of which can fly relatively well. They are also delicious.

    92. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tech review
      Tech every moment.

    93. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by slinches · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from. There's no unique "killer" feature that can make any of the alternatives stand out as objectively superior to the current mobile platforms, but the same could have been said about the iPod or iPhone when they were released in their respective markets. It doesn't necessarily take a revolutionary product to change the landscape of a market, just a well executed one.

      As far as how Nokia would have fared with MeeGo, it may have taken some skillful marketing, a few cross-licensing agreements that Nokia may not have been ready to commit to and a bit of luck, but the potential was there technically to make it a very competitive third player. I guess the argument could be made (IMHO a questionable one) that Windows Phone was in the same position at the time Elop made his decision, but even if that's the case why wouldn't having control over the full hardware/software stack be the better option for Nokia?

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    94. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these Triumphs?

    95. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Good Lord save us from babies that don't know shit. Who said shit about Win95? Read a book kid the first IE that gained share was IE4 and that was for Win 3.x and you had to download it! Sure they included IE 6 months later in Win95 but like today just because MSFT released a new OS didn't magically make the world adopt it and it was a good 2 and a half years before the majority had moved away from Win 3.x, despite the bullshit MSFT tried to push of the world waiting on baited breath for the Win 95 release.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    96. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hey! · · Score: 1

      Like throwing a drowning man an anchor...

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    97. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Again you ignore the more important question which was WHY were they buying dumphones? They were buying dumbphones because the lowest Android smartphone cost a year's wage there so they really didn't have a choice, did they? Well that ended by the middle of 2011, the ultra cheap Cortex SoC made it so that the only really expensive part of the phone was the screen and they solved that by economies of scale, which is why damned near every phone coming out of Asia all have the exact same screen size and design, standardize on one and build a billion and the price quickly drops to very little.

      That doesn't change the fact that you are arguing its worth being the "king of 8-tracks" when every month another market was being lost and simply not replaced. By the time Elop was brought in they had lost almost the entire American continent, just about all of Europe, Japan, and a good chunk of China was switching, only the dirt poor rural areas left. And again you are arguing that there is profit to be made by selling to the most dirt poor people on the planet when the simple fact is Nokia had their factories in their home country and their countrymen weren't gonna work for a buck an hour like the Chinese. The release of the Loongson SoC that let you make a complete dumbphone in China for less than $3 USD put the final nail in that coffin, as any of those dirt poor folks buying a dumbphone wouldn't be buying a Nokia, they would be buying a "Mokia" or other Chinese knockoff.

      You can point to the past all you want, I will likewise point to sales of 8-tracks in 1978 or betamax in 1981, when you've bet the company on a dead technology there really is no way to go but down. Now you can argue that Elop took a slow death spiral and sped it up, which is arguable, but that doesn't magically change a death spiral into growth. The release of the ultra cheap Cortex SoC was the final nail in the coffin for the dumbphone and there was NOTHING that Elop could do or say to change that, nothing at all. To argue otherwise would be just as insane as saying you think you can get 8-tracks to make a comeback, the tech is dead dude, its not coming back and Elop or frankly anybody that read the trade papers could see that.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    98. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were competing competing against all of the Android vendors but handicapped with the crappy windows phone OS...

    99. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by MiSaunaSnob · · Score: 1

      Oh the humanity Whoooshhh...

    100. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from. There's no unique "killer" feature that can make any of the alternatives stand out as objectively superior to the current mobile platforms, but the same could have been said about the iPod or iPhone when they were released in their respective markets. It doesn't necessarily take a revolutionary product to change the landscape of a market, just a well executed one.

      Fair point, I suppose the only thing that I felt is that while the N9 was a great device Nokia really had to go all out on it and commit to it the same way Apple did with the iPod and iPhone, Nokia's phone smartphone would be the N9 and that's it. Licensing MeeGo would inevitably lead to cheap knockoffs that don't offer the same feel and dilute the brand and having a shedload of models takes away from the tightly coupled and predictable experience you get by tying the hardware and software.

      As far as how Nokia would have fared with MeeGo, it may have taken some skillful marketing, a few cross-licensing agreements that Nokia may not have been ready to commit to and a bit of luck, but the potential was there technically to make it a very competitive third player.

      I still think it's in the same arena as every other OS though, they could all do the same thing but the advantage Nokia had was their reputation for building brilliant handsets so perhaps they could have leveraged that to some degree.

      I guess the argument could be made (IMHO a questionable one) that Windows Phone was in the same position at the time Elop made his decision, but even if that's the case why wouldn't having control over the full hardware/software stack be the better option for Nokia?

      Probably, really Nokia needed to be the exclusive Windows Phone maker with Microsoft doing all the work and pouring all the money in to market it and integrate it with Windows, then Nokia could have focused on just building great handsets without having to worry about differentiating from other competitors on the same platform.

    101. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia making mistakes doesn't imply that Nokia was in trouble as a company before Elop. It was only after Elop's Windows phone strategy that they lost their chance to attract the market and revenue they were hoping for.

    102. Re:Beware of Microsofties bearing gifts by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Good Lord save us from babies that don't know shit. Read a book kid the first IE that gained share was IE4 and that was for Win 3.x and you had to download it!

      Good lord, stop assuming that you know everything about someone else. I was there when NCSA Mosaic was THE browser to use. Also to back up your facts, please learn to use the internet:

      Version 4.0 was included with Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2.5 and 4.01 in Windows 98, in addition the Internet Explorer layout engine Trident was introduced. It attained just over 60% market share by March 1999 when IE5 was released.

      Otherwise your attempts to revise history don't look so obvious.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  2. Times of India has the MS Email by symbolset · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Times of India has the MS Email by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were trying to buy Ikea?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. and there goes the Nokia Android by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping Steven Elop would go to sink MS into the ground as CEO, and anticipating Nokia being free to build a nice Android phone. Guess it will never happen.

    1. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I doubt there's an agreement that Nokia will not re-enter the phone business... So this might actually make Nokia Android, or Nokia Sailfish phones a possibility in 1-2 year timeframe. It's a long shot, but one can always hope, eh?

    2. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that left of Nokia is a shell of debt.

    3. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. What we need is not more Android but more choice. Nokia has been the only ones that has been serious about Windows 8 Phone Series for Handsets Professional Touch Edition 2013. In a world where everyone is moving toward Android we need something to balance that, and that's where Microsoft + Nokia makes sense. We should not live in a world where Google is the only choice.

    4. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want "more choice", Nokia had that before. It was called MeeGo, and Elop killed it.

    5. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by manplusdog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rubbish, not insightful. Nokia were a world leader and I loved their gear until Elop threw away their technology and embraced Windows phone crap. Look at Nokia most successful products, not based on Windows phone. He deserved to be sacked, quoted as being the worst CEO ever.

    6. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by 21mhz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MeeGo was another WebOS: late, buggy, and basically going nowhere with the organization they had and the cannon ball of Intel shackled to their leg.

      Nokia would have made a glorious last stand with it, open source geeks would support them (never mind an occasional grumble about the bugs, wanton platform changes, and closed components, what's this between friends), but in the end it wouldn't bring bread to the table without substantial cultural changes and a lot of development. Yes, I'm familiar with The Legend of Spectacular N9 Sales.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    7. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any Nokia also used to have Symbian for a long time. Do you (still) consider Symbian competitive, if not better, than iOS and/ or Android? Who is killing a platform isn't the only problem here, people cannot understand that the ecosystem can't be built by Nokia alone.

    8. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      in some markets, yes.

      Symbian still sells way more than Windows phone, both in smart and feature phone versions.

      I'm sure it can't last forever, but who could have said that'd outlast the company.

      http://bgr.com/2012/07/19/nokia-q2-2012-earnings-analysis/

      Of course, this is a vastly reduced sales figure compared to what it was before Elop opened his mouth.

    9. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, I'm familiar with The Legend of Spectacular N9 Sales.

      Spectacular reviews, and terrible sales because Elop sabotaged it.

    10. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem with WP is that it's Yet Another Closed System. If I wanted that kind of "choice" I'd go with Apple.

    11. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nokia isn't going to enter the phone business anytime soon, but Nokia's former employees have already launched a new company called Jolla, and their phone (with Sailfish OS) is being produced as we speak.

    12. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps he will replace Ballmer. He does appear to have the desired 'consumers should just shut the fsck up and buy what we tell them to' attitude to consumer relations and seems as adept at handling employees and morale to make the shift in leadership seamless.

      Somehow I suspect the problem at Microsoft is the board. They aquired the stock while liking the mindset of the management and having kept Ballmer for so long they obviously want that. They'll keep running it the same way, all the way into the eventual crash into the ground.

    13. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I think it is a certainty, and the deal was done before Elop went to Nokia.

    14. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Vollernurd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This ^^ Like you, am I the only one that remembers the Nokia Basket Case before Elop came aboard? Their phones were crap, all 300 of them in the catalogue, the N9 couldn't be bought anywhere it was supposedly available, networks were no longer foisting them on unsuspecting members of the public ("You can't afford an iPhone so here's the Next Best Thing!" *hands them a shitty Nokia 500*). Sheesh. I'm Glad no more phones will bear the Nokia name - I never forgave them from killing off the last good cellphone in the Nokia 6310i and for creating the Abomination N95 and every other Symbian/S60 POS. Nokia were the architects of their own demise, not Elop. Their arrogance and rank incompetence caused their downfall. I would cite the article where old or former Nokia employees berate the culture and organisation of the old company but can't find them. They appeared around the time Elop wrote his "Burning Platforms" memo.

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    15. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Vollernurd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meh, replying to my own post. Found this:

      http://www.telecoms.com/22503/nokia%E2%80%99s-problem

      The N97 was the phone I was thinking of although ALL of their Nxx devices were crap.

      And there were so MANY of them! Why have 5 SKUs where 500 will do? Always doing the networks' bidding...

      Yes, I have also discovered HTML formatting too - sorry about original post.

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    16. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meego was another Maemo, not WebOS, it have its own lineage as example. Was sabotaged by Symbian fans inside Nokia first, then the days before it was released Elop said that it had no future, cut all future hopes for development for the platform, and released just one phone with it, just because already made it. Is even against that that sold pretty well. And yes, sold better than the Windows 7.x phones that Microsoft killed before they come out to the market saying that they will have no future neither (but most people that buys windows phone only hears windows phone, not version, so even with that had sales).

      Anyway, wasn't the end of the road, there is hope on Qt-based cellphones still. From it derived Sailfish that is about to come out (the first batch already sold out), and Tizen, that Samsung could start making phones with it.

    17. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by LavouraArcaica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know some people that have (or had) a N9. Everybody, including non-geeks, says it's the best phone ever. It's ok if you don't believe me, go check the reviews.
      And, hey, It was launched even before the Windows Phone 7.5 (which actually "late, buggy"). Microsoft only made a competitive OS with WP 8, 2 years after the Meego was ALREADY in the market.

      I really don't understand how so many people buys the official MS-NOKIA-ELOP version of the history, where everything points the contrary.

    18. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by andydread · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep but Microsoft products certainly is not it. I would rather and Open Source platform dominate than ANY proprietary platform.

    19. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he will replace Ballmer. He does appear to have the desired 'consumers should just shut the fsck up and buy what we tell them to' attitude to consumer relations and seems as adept at handling employees and morale to make the shift in leadership seamless.

      Somehow I suspect the problem at Microsoft is the board. They aquired the stock while liking the mindset of the management and having kept Ballmer for so long they obviously want that. They'll keep running it the same way, all the way into the eventual crash into the ground.

      There are those who have speculated that this may be the case.

      I think that anyone who do something as foolish as tie their company's future to an also-ran platform would not the be best choice to resuscitate the moribund Microsoft, but they don't pay me vast sums of money because I'm required to make the right decisions.

    20. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android dev package runs on linux, osx and windows. Winphone8 development *requires* Windows 8 OS.

      You were saying something about having choices..?

    21. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by knarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Windows 8 Phone Series for Handsets Professional Touch Edition 2013

      I think that needs just a little more cowbell:

      Windows 8 Phone Select Series for Handsets Executive Platinum Professional Touch Diamond Edition 2013

      There. Done. Ship it.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    22. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Znork · · Score: 2

      Well, on the bright side there are few things that work as well for collapsing profitability as mass producing expensive hardware that nobody actually wants. While Nokia shareholders certainly and deservedly (for hiring someone with the profile of Elop with the similarities to such as Richard Beluzzo) got thoroughly screwed, this may become a significant lodestone that sinks Microsoft faster than it would risk otherwise.

    23. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by dyfet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed, that is exactly what I said would happen at the time, too... that he made a deal to return and be Ballmer's successor once he was done doing to Nokia what Belluzo did to SGI. The similarities are strong too; remember, Microsoft then needed Belluzo to take down a unix workstation vendor to help establish market presense for it's own crappy new proprietary workstation OS that nobody would want then either; it was called NT. Thugs rarely change their MO, unless or until they are finally imprisoned for it.

    24. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am I the only one that remembers the Nokia Basket Case before Elop came aboard? Their phones were crap

      You make it sound like Elop saved the day.

    25. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Right. Anything Nokia was going to do to save itself had to be started three or five years earlier. MeeGo was too late. The switch to Windows Phone (or if it had happened, Android) in 2010 would have been too late.

      To me the real tragedy in all of this is the Nokia 808 PureView. Its camera is now more or less the one in the Lumia 1020. If that phone had launched with Android and wider carrier support (I think it's GSM-only, at least in the US), maybe Nokia would be limping along a little better than it is now. But it's too late now.

    26. Re: and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was gonna say. The N95 was a huge success at least here in Europe.

    27. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

      Nokia 6310i, I carried this phone through hell and back for three years. Never be another like it, as you don't need to buy a replacement for a phone that wont break.

    28. Re: and there goes the Nokia Android by tom229 · · Score: 1

      I'd say what we need is more Android. Windows, Blackberry, and Apple are all selling closed, proprietary, walled gardens. Google is distributing an open platform with the option to use its software suite and android trademark if you choose to do so. The simple fact is that the world has never had a business viable open operating system platform until now (yes that was a direct stab at GPL).

      Android is clearly the only choice. If you don't like Google's services, don't use them. It's the only platform that will even allow that.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    29. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by DetriusXii · · Score: 1

      What are you limited by in a world where only Android phones existed? You can modify the kernel like Cyanogenmod does and you're free to get your user space applications not from the Play store.

    30. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by AVee · · Score: 1

      The N97 was the phone I was thinking of although ALL of their Nxx devices were crap.

      The N95 was kinda ok, the N97 was a buggy disaster, the N900 was a great pocketable computer (bulky and geeky, but great), the N9 was simply brilliant but got killed before it arrived. That's the short history of the N line. By the time they got it right they decided to go the other way...

    31. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Meego was another Maemo, not WebOS, it have its own lineage as example.

      I used WebOS in a figurative sense: an also-ran mobile OS that was too little, too late.
      They muddled the lineage by banding up with Intel, meaning that the platform was going to be rebased on Moblin.

      Was sabotaged by Symbian fans inside Nokia first, then the days before it was released Elop said that it had no future, cut all future hopes for development for the platform, and released just one phone with it, just because already made it.

      Revisionism. The strategy change announcement was made half a year before the N9 was released. And well before Elop, it was decided internally that the software on the N9 is a one-off with no future, because MeeGo proper was being developed in parallel, with a late 2011 shipping date in mind (yes, that's when they shipped the Lumia 800 after the big turnaround). See, Nokia was really big on nonsensical parallel development back then. Anyone who knows the development story of the N900 and the N9 can confirm that.

      Is even against that that sold pretty well.

      This is a myth created by Tomi Ahonen and a few commenters on a tech blog.

      the Windows 7.x phones that Microsoft killed before they come out to the market saying that they will have no future neither (but most people that buys windows phone only hears windows phone, not version, so even with that had sales).

      You mean the phones that are still supported and getting newly released apps? Keep telling that to people stuck on buggy Gingerbread phones.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    32. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      I had the N9 too, and I had the Lumia 800. The one that didn't cause me to miss calendar appointments won. Guess which one it was. Sorry, the nice UI was not enough, neither was Linux inside (is it ever), and Windows Phone UI is arguably even better.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    33. Re: and there goes the Nokia Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but if you knew anything about Symbian and smartphone development and Nokia processes you would know that at release minus six months the final hardware and software was basically available.

      It looked too good and had to be stomped down.

      So yes, you are wrong and OP is right.

    34. Re: and there goes the Nokia Android by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Sorry but if you knew anything about Symbian and smartphone development and Nokia processes you would know that at release minus six months the final hardware and software was basically available.

      If by "basically available" you mean being able to boot up and run a few carefully chosen smoke tests, then yeah. As a product ready to go to market, no way in hell.

      Regardless, the "oh shit moment" leading to cancelling MeeGo happened some weeks before the announcement, and it was caused by the fact that no matter what shape the N9 was in, the actual MeeGo platform to be developed for years to come was in total shambles and not scheduled to be ready until late 2011 at the earliest.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    35. Re:and there goes the Nokia Android by riondluz · · Score: 1

      Aside: You can have my N900 when you can pry....

      Znork replied:
      "Somehow I suspect the problem at Microsoft is the board"
      Its natural for people to think in terms of pointing fingers and placing blame. But only the whales know what the motives and true intentions are in any play of this size.
      Besides, who cares, in the end, if Microsoft bleeds out. M$ dying puts it in the ranks of other greats in past decades. Corps come and, actually, do go. Sadly the people running them refuse to fade away gracefully and take their capitalistic talents elsewhere.

      But that's the plan afterall. Elop follows orders that are, ultimately, only about accruing share value and private fortunes. While M$ is being buried, another venture capital firm will be waiting in the wings; run by the same cast of characters (wasps/elites) to the same ultimate end: seizeing what they can and separating investors from their money.

      --
      resist propaganda
  4. Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome back

  5. Future of Nokia, future of WP by Urkki · · Score: 1

    So, Nokia will become a network infra company, with hefty cash reserves and some nice patent licensing revenue. Oh, and then there's the location business, essentially competing with Google, but... good luck with that.

    But all the (remaining) Nokia fans, start to look for a new phone brand!

    How many will choose Microsoft?

    I have a suspicion about what happens to Windows Phone sales, everywhere except the US maybe. And low end Lumias like 520 were doing pretty good... Sad.

    1. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia(Navteq?) actually has way better map data than google. Maybe they will license it to Apple now as they are no longer a direct competitor?

    2. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple will buy the maps...

    3. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is buying the nav/maps too.

    4. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by DogDude · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have a suspicion about what happens to Windows Phone sales, everywhere except the US maybe.

      Of course, you're aware of MS Phone's strong growth in all markets, right?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Urkki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft is buying the nav/maps too.

      Not according to the press release:

      Following the transaction, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, a leader in technology development and licensing.

    6. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Urkki · · Score: 2

      I have a suspicion about what happens to Windows Phone sales, everywhere except the US maybe.

      Of course, you're aware of MS Phone's strong growth in all markets, right?

      MS does not (yet) make phones, so I doubt there's any growth at the moment... They just make a smartphone OS, and Nokia phones using this OS have seen some nice growth this year. On the other hand, sales of Microsoft's own tablets, with a sister OS... not so hot. So current growth of Nokia Lumia sales is not much of an indication of what will happen to future Microsoft phones, one way or another.

    7. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by dbIII · · Score: 0

      I still haven't seen many apart from under dusty glass in a shop so think the "all" bit is hype and suspect it's not doing well anywhere.

    8. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I still haven't seen many apart from under dusty glass in a shop so think the "all" bit is hype and suspect it's not doing well anywhere.

      You need to get out more, apparently

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    9. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about "strong growth" when it has almost reached 10% in a couple of markets. This compares with Windows Mobile's 60% market share in some markets a few years back. Also, this is on low end devices which, with the lack of applications and the lack of features they have, are essentially dumbphones with a Windows sticker. Beyond that, the devices are subsidised, not just by the operators but by Nokia and (indirectly) by Microsoft's payments to Nokia. That is seriously desperate.

      It's very hard to not have "strong growth" if you are essentially paying people to take your devices and you fail to measure against your past devices by renaming your OS. What's astounding is that MicroNokia seem to have succeeded in most of the important markets.

    10. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only pitty, at least on my work phone, gps takes several hours to find a signal rendering the licensed maps fairly useless

    11. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Less than one in ten is your big number? I think that article explains to an extent why I haven't been seeing them.

    12. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Frankie70 · · Score: 2

      iPhone has less than 2 in ten. Is that an acceptable number?

    13. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's what I was wondering - what will the residual Nokia be making now? I recall a time they made monitors, but I'm guessing that's not it. Networking infrastructure? What else do they sell?

      So will Microsoft be marketing only the Lumias, or will they be porting Windows 8 to MetroPCS and all the other Nokia phones in the lineup?

    14. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      http://www.zdnet.com/windows-phone-outsells-iphone-in-seven-markets-blackberry-in-26-7000013236/

      Nokia are doing much better than you give them credit for. Asha is doing great in emerging markets and Lumia is performing well in mid/low range battlefield markets. It's also sliding nicely into the niche Blackberry is currently vacating. That's a position Microsoft can build on - they need to keep the Nokia brands going and itterate the OS like hell until they catch up with iOS and the high-end Android set. It's a question of whether they decide to aim for the high end or consolidate and gobble up the low/mid range.

    15. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Statistically, that's 1 out of 12 phones is a Windows Phone. Statistically, that means that you aren't likely to have seen many more than 12 different cell phones in recent years. So yes, I stand by my initial statement that you should consider getting out more.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    16. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by erroneus · · Score: 1

      If they could convert their microsoft phones into being a mouse or a keyboard, they might have something there. Microsoft branded mice and keyboards are still moving sort of...

    17. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      They can go back to making tyres and woodpulp. They were rather good at it.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    18. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      And we're also aware that their "strong growth" is a statistic of year-over-year sales. If you start with next-to-nothing, and then grow by 300%, you are at 300% of next-to-nothing, otherwise known as next-to-next-to-nothing.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Kingkaid · · Score: 1

      Nokia's mapping tech is actually well ahead of Google's and it currently used by more systems than Google. Nearly all car makers use NAVTEQ for their mapping needs.

    20. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by adamstew · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/1102/

      "We increased sales by 300%"... but when you only sold 3 phones last year, you still only sold 9 phones this year.

    21. Re:Future of Nokia, future of WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistically, that's 1 out of 12 phones is a Windows Phone

      No it's not. It's 1 out 12 recent sales, not 1 out 12 phones. And that's only in a select group of countries. Maybe 1 out of 200 phones is a Windows phone. Probably fewer than that. I live outside those five countries and I've never even seen one in use.

  6. Hmm... by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

    That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:Hmm... by Engeekneer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's just incredible. I don't even blame Microsoft that much. What the hell was the Nokia board thinking? "Oh, this guy has run our company to the ground, he seems ok! Let's give him a few more years as CEO."

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, this is such a surprise move that nobody saw it coming at all. Not ever, certainly not when he took first over at nokia.

    3. Re:Hmm... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One article says the share price is down 53% during his tenure, just under three years. That's damn fine work, especially in this market!

      [aside: yes, we know pretty much everybody on Slashdot called this from day 1]

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Hmm... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Informative

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    5. Re:Hmm... by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      'Hey, things are looking up, let's sell our brand!'

      --
      It is what it is.
    6. Re:Hmm... by Urkki · · Score: 2

      MS did not buy Nokia, MS bouth Nokia phone business, which I think is roughly half of Nokia. Nokia shareholders will not become MS shareholders here.

    7. Re:Hmm... by quax · · Score: 1

      It is truly odious, isn't it?

    8. Re:Hmm... by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's incredible is that I haven't seen any mention of the shareholders or board of directors attempting to sue Elop's ass off for malfeasance.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    9. Re:Hmm... by Dracos · · Score: 2

      That was precisely the plan all along. The only surprising piece of this is that the this purchase is about a year earlier than expected. The remaining parts of Nokia, including the patent portfolio, will be snapped up by Redmond soon enough (read: after the stock value deflates more).

    10. Re:Hmm... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      If Elop becomes CEO at Microsoft, it will essentially prove the company still has absolutely no idea how to move forward in today's technological world.

      And I'm perfectly okay with that.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    11. Re:Hmm... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      The remaining parts is useless for Microsoft. So no need to buy them.

      It was the devices Microsoft wanted all along.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    12. Re:Hmm... by guttentag · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking?

      The New York Times has that quote:

      In a statement, Risto Siilasmaa, chairman of Nokia’s board and Nokia’s interim chief executive, said that “the deal offers future opportunities for many Nokia employees as part of a company with the strategy, financial resources and determination to succeed in the mobile space.”

      In case you missed it in all that PR-talk, the Nokia board believes that Microsoft has the strategy to succeed in the mobile space, despite the fact that Microsoft's failed strategy and partnership with Nokia is what caused Nokia's failure. In other words, he's been asleep for the last three years.

      A better question is "what was Microsoft thinking?" Nokia makes good hardware, but so does Microsoft. What Microsoft needs in the mobile space is a good operating system, which Nokia had until Microsoft convinced it to supplant it with Windows. Nokia's not failing because it didn't make a good phone, it's failing because it filled good hardware with Microsoft's software. Now Microsoft is buying a company allegedly for its expertise in cramming poor MS software into good hardware? It doesn't make any sense. If your head doesn't hurt yet, wait for the claims that Microsoft only bought Nokia to get Elop back to take a leaf out of Apple's playbook, buying next to get Jobs back.

      A brief history of Stephen Elop:
      -CIO of Boston Chicken (Boston Market) when it filed for bankruptcy protection and left that year. The company was bought by McDonald's for its real estate holdings two years later.
      -CEO of Macromedia, acquired by Adobe three months after he took the job.
      -Worked at Adobe for a year, resigned.
      -Worked at Juniper for a year, resigned.
      -Worked at Microsoft for two years
      -Named CEO of Nokia three years ago this month, big contribution was throwing out in-house work and betting the company on Windows mobile, and ultimately oversees the sale of the company to Microsoft.
      -Next up: Back at Microsoft, poised as the only act who could possibly top Ballmer as worst CEO ever. For the record, he doesn't throw chairs... he throws phones. "I can take care of that for you right here. It's gone!" Remember those words when Windows is the next "burning platform." The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

    13. Re:Hmm... by rastos1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now the next step is to return to Maemo to raise the share price back.

    14. Re:Hmm... by symbolset · · Score: 2

      The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      Attachmate is where old software goes to die.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    15. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking?

      Best guess seems to be: The largest shareholders of Nokia (the type that get people on the board) are even larger shareholders of Microsoft. Microsoft has been clearly failing (I don't mean losing money; failing to keep mindshare and deliver new things) for several years. The idea was to sacrifice Nokia's success to bolster Microsoft's. This move seems to back that up. How the hell someone would prove this I have no idea, but anyone who is employed at Nokia, has evidence of this and hasn't given it to the Finnish financial authorities should do that now.

    16. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A brief history of Stephen Elop:

      -CIO of Boston Chicken (Boston Market) when it filed for bankruptcy protection and left that year. The company was bought by McDonald's for its real estate holdings two years later.

      -CEO of Macromedia, acquired by Adobe three months after he took the job.

      -Worked at Adobe for a year, resigned.

      -Worked at Juniper for a year, resigned.

      -Worked at Microsoft for two years

      -Named CEO of Nokia three years ago this month, big contribution was throwing out in-house work and betting the company on Windows mobile, and ultimately oversees the sale of the company to Microsoft.

      -Next up: Back at Microsoft, poised as the only act who could possibly top Ballmer as worst CEO ever. For the record, he doesn't throw chairs... he throws phones. "I can take care of that for you right here. It's gone!" Remember those words when Windows is the next "burning platform." The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      So is Elop a raging idiot who runs companies into the ground out of incompetence or rather a stealthy hitman who failed his missions inside Adobe and Juniper? I'm inclined to believe the latter.

    17. Re:Hmm... by dbIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the hell was the Nokia board thinking

      He's giving me this much to recommend Elop?

    18. Re:Hmm... by Alomex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yet he's touted as the likely heir for CEO when Ballmer retires.

      It reminds me of the resume of Gil Amelio, who had a similar record of failures yet people managed to convince themselves that he was some sort of CEO genius. He took Apple to the lowest point, when in desperation tried to buy BeOS. He fscked up that deal and then, to his incredible luck, bought NeXT instead. Jobs forced the board to fire Amelio and the recovery of Apple began then.

    19. Re:Hmm... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Considering the layoffs the devices only have a very short term value. The goose is dead and the eggs are getting old.

    20. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      Samsung? Some Chinese shop nobody heard of? North Korea? Enough candidates.

    21. Re:Hmm... by guttentag · · Score: 1

      Yet he's touted as the likely heir for CEO when Ballmer retires.

      It reminds me of the resume of Gil Amelio, who had a similar record of failures yet people managed to convince themselves that he was some sort of CEO genius. He took Apple to the lowest point, when in desperation tried to buy BeOS. He fscked up that deal and then, to his incredible luck, bought NeXT instead. Jobs forced the board to fire Amelio and the recovery of Apple began then.

      Are you suggesting Elop is the rebound CEO? He's not supposed to be the one? Wait 'till Microsoft brings him home to meet the parents. Microsoft's reproductive-marketing clock is ticking... and the shareholders want to see some grandkids.

    22. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia's not failing because it didn't make a good phone, it's failing because it filled good hardware with Microsoft's software.

      Actually Nokia has been failing for a while, before MS stepped in.

    23. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      despite the fact that Microsoft's failed strategy and partnership with Nokia is what caused Nokia's failure.

      Sigh. Nokia's failure happened way before that. It was called Symbian. It's not that you couldn't sell a pieceofshit OS for a while when there wasn't serious competition but clinging to it like it was _the_ future was beyond stupid.

    24. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine the time at Adobe was just part of the reward for a successful Macromedia hit. With Juniper and Microsoft he was prospecting for clients, and found gold with Microsoft.

    25. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it could turn out that Elop is a very skilled CEO when he's not trying to sabotage a company. He's already proven how skilled he is when is is trying to do so.

    26. Re:Hmm... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      They weren't clinging to it because it was the future, but because maemo/meego/... wasn't quite ready yet. And just when it was ready, they ditched it and went with the OS with a proven track record to match Symbian's trajectory - Windows CE^H^HPock^H^H^H^HMob^H^H^HPhone.

    27. Re:Hmm... by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      What?!? They don't get a cut of MS!?!? Sheesh! And the phone business is only half of Nokia? !yes, they're very well known for all their non-phone tech.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    28. Re:Hmm... by fritsd · · Score: 1

      The patents have already been sold apparently, to a "ringtone advertisement" company called Vringo Inc. which is now sueing mobile phone companies like ZTE for billions.
      So who's going to buy Vringo? My guess would be Intellectual Ventures.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    29. Re:Hmm... by jones_supa · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's just incredible. I don't even blame Microsoft that much. What the hell was the Nokia board thinking? "Oh, this guy has run our company to the ground, he seems ok! Let's give him a few more years as CEO."

      Duh. It wasn't Elop who ran the company to the ground. Nokia was fucked up looong before Elop arrived at the scene. The core of the problem was them being stuck with Symbian, which was a slow, clunky to use and very buggy phone operating system. Then Android and iPhone arrived which basically stomped all over Nokia. At that point Nokia accepted the Windows Phone deal as an emergency solution. And then we can fast forward to the present day.

    30. Re:Hmm... by HyperQuantum · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      Well in this case it looks more like: INFILTRATE - WEAKEN - ASSIMILATE

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    31. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer Associates?

    32. Re:Hmm... by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Or they wanted what is happening on the NASDAQ OMX Helsinki Stock Market right now, Nokia is up 41% and there are already (after being open for half the day) 20 times as much trades as there is on a normal day for Nokia. They large shareholders are probably selling all they can at the moment.

    33. Re:Hmm... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

      There were rumors a few years back abut the Vatican being interested.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Hmm... by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

      The numbers are almost funny, Nokia on the NASDAQ OMX Helsinki market is up 41.6% since yesterday but down 41.2% since three years ago (3 sep 2010)

    35. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is Elop a raging idiot who runs companies into the ground out of incompetence or rather a stealthy hitman who failed his missions inside Adobe and Juniper? I'm inclined to believe the latter.

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity! (Robert Hanlon)

    36. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just incredible. I don't even blame Microsoft that much. What the hell was the Nokia board thinking? "Oh, this guy has run our company to the ground, he seems ok! Let's give him a few more years as CEO."

      In Elop's defence, the rot set in before he took over. During his tenure he's done a fine job in maintaining the downward trend, and I'm wondering will there be any kind of investigation here? Seems odd that an Ex-Microsoft guy comes in, plumps for the Microsoft option (with board support), which is at best scavenging market share from the bottom feeders of the industry, and has certainly been complicit in the drop in value of Nokia. With Nokia's mobile business gutted, Microsoft buys it and gets Elop back as part of the deal. People have been predicting this turn of events for years now, as it seemed no good could come of Nokia wedding itself to Windows Phone.

    37. Re:Hmm... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      A better question is "what was Microsoft thinking?"

      Probably:

      "Oohh, look at all those delicious patents we're acquiring from Nokia. Hey, Apple, Samsung, Google... tell your IP lawyers to cancel their vacations! Fol-de-rol!"

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    38. Re:Hmm... by Baki · · Score: 1

      But when Elop came, they could and should have gone at least with BOTH windows phone and android. Betting everything on one horse surely was a mistake, or on purpose by Elop being the trojan horse towards Nokia.

    39. Re:Hmm... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      the patents are not being bought - they're being licenced for 10 years with an option to continue licencing them after that.

      They're also not buying the Nokia brand (except for current devices), so it'll be a Microsoft Lumia for future models.... I can see that helping them loads .

    40. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, thanks for clarifying that out. Here I was thinking that Nokia could have very well pushed out a serious meego/maemo device years and years ago if they had took it seriously, but oh well if it wasn't "ready" you obviously couldn't have done that.

    41. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He can sell Msoft to almost anyone once he gets the pesky mktcap down.

    42. Re:Hmm... by Engeekneer · · Score: 2

      Sure, Nokia was not in the perfect shape. Symbian was getting old, but there was a migration strategy. Also Nokia still had 40% mobile phone marketshare IIRC, and Symbian was still pulling in TONS of money (there was a great writeup about this by an ex-Nokian a while back). Elop with his comments and strategies sent Nokia into a nosedive it never recovered from. From the outside at least, he pretty much singlehandedly took a "meh" situation and killed Nokia.

      As for the emergency solution, Nokia had good (well decent at least) plans and roadmaps before Elop came. Elop made a totally horrible deal with the Windows *#%&, and the whole motivation of that deal is pretty obvious.

    43. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The remaining part just shoot up in stock price, around 40% right now.

    44. Re:Hmm... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Nokia makes good hardware, but so does Microsoft

      bahahaha. Oh wait you're serious? I'd have to say Nokia makes much better hardware than MS. But as you said, the problem with Nokia phones was MS software. In the best light, the problem was the lack of software for WP7/8.

      If your head doesn't hurt yet, wait for the claims that Microsoft only bought Nokia to get Elop back to take a leaf out of Apple's playbook, buying next to get Jobs back.

      Maybe Apple did that in the larger scheme of things; however, Apple did get NeXT software which became the basis of OS X so it wasn't just for Jobs if you believe that reason.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    45. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shareholders are big US pension funds and the chairman of the board is a high-ranking Bilderberger. What did you think would happen?

    46. Re:Hmm... by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Of course, if the bought all of Nokia, they'd be in the tire business, and while I guess diversifying could be a good thing, running a tire manufacturer may not be Microsoft's forte.

    47. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man looks even dumber than Ballmer

    48. Re:Hmm... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Gil Amelio got his reputation by accidentally making National Semiconductor stay alive. Apple hired him based on that, where he indirectly did save Apple by tripping on something and buying NeXT.

      Remember the best Gil Amelio quote (recounted by way of Steve Jobs): "Apple is a sinking ship, and it's my job to get it pointed in the right direction."

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    49. Re:Hmm... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      They're thinking "Hey, we get to get rid of Elop for the low price of our phone business that is failing anyway; plus we get a mountain of cash to keep the infrastructure, mapping, and R&D departments alive."

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    50. Re:Hmm... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No problem, they can bring back the Zune name!
      Microsoft ZunePhone, how can that not be a huge success?

    51. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this even legal?

    52. Re:Hmm... by wandazulu · · Score: 1

      So is Elop a raging idiot who runs companies into the ground out of incompetence or rather a stealthy hitman who failed his missions inside Adobe and Juniper? I'm inclined to believe the latter.

      What would have been his mission at Adobe and Juniper? To sell them to McDonalds?

    53. Re:Hmm... by Dekonega · · Score: 1

      How about... the IBM? Man, that would be funny.

    54. Re:Hmm... by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      Nokia still to this day makes extremely good hardware. They were looking for a new CEO and found Elop. The thing is, what if they'd found someone else? Someone with just a little bit of focus and vision? It surprises me that people can't consider the idea of Nokia ditching Symbian and focusing on MeeGo or even going Android; their phones easily rival or even surpass stuff from Samsung and HTC and their brand is renown. If they managed to survive three years with the failure that is Windows Phone, they could've done the same with MeeGo.

    55. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He is still working for Boston Chicken... When he gets to become CEO of Microsoft he will run it into the ground so that finally Boston Chicken will buy it.

    56. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      Well in this case it looks more like: INFILTRATE - WEAKEN - ASSIMILATE

      where's the defecate step? 'cause the profit, that sure isn't in sight.

    57. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if the bought all of Nokia, they'd be in the tire business, and while I guess diversifying could be a good thing, running a tire manufacturer may not be Microsoft's forte.

      Nah, MS is a bit late if they wanted any rubber business. The tyre company was split first on Nokia in 1988. See Nokian Tyres wiki page for more details.

    58. Re:Hmm... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      well he went with Macromedia to Adobe, so really it is just Juniper that is in question.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    59. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that Microsoft's failed strategy and partnership with Nokia is what caused Nokia's failure

      In what world was Nokia NOT plummeting like a rock when they partnered with Microsoft?

      Spare us the "they were selling tons of feature phones" - the only way to be profitable in that market is to own the market, and sell hundreds of millions of units with razor-thin per-unit profit margins. Nokia was failing because the smartphone market was expanding down and eating into the feature phone market, and they had NOTHING that was ready to ship that would compete well with iOS, Android, and Blackberry.

      So, they made a deal with Microsoft - who had a reasonably capable platform, a long history of platform development experience, and deep pockets, but little mobile hardware design experience. Let's be honest, this is simply geek angst over a failing "geek favorite" company being bought out by "the enemy." Nokia was failing long before Microsoft arrived on the scene, and would be in much the same state today, with it's "3 platforms is barely enough, we should consider forking Meego/Maemo/Symbian and trying YET ANOTHER strategy!"

      You fiddle too long, sometimes Rome does burn.

    60. Re:Hmm... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Nokia makes good hardware, but so does Microsoft.

      What?!

      Google "Xbox Red Ring" and count me the hits you find there.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    61. Re:Hmm... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      So Elop left Microsoft to head up Nokia, where he made supposedly very idiotic changes that had the effect of destroying Nokia's share price. Microsoft then buys Nokia at a fraction of the cost it would otherwise have been, and Elop returns to a prestigious role at Microsoft, where he's in with a shot at the CEO role.

      That doesn't look the slightest bit dodgy at all.

      EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH.

      Well in this case it looks more like: INFILTRATE - WEAKEN - ASSIMILATE

      where's the defecate step? 'cause the profit, that sure isn't in sight.

      The defecate step of Nokia is the profit step for Microsoft.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    62. Re:Hmm... by Kingkaid · · Score: 1

      Nokia was thinking - the phone is now no longer king, it is the fusion of hardware and software that makes a phone great (look at Apple when they hired Elop). Nokia was good at making hardware, but frankly, and despite what a lot of /.ers believe, Nokia sucked at software. It wasn't what they did well. So they hired a software guy to run the company, hoping it would at least allow them to compete. Elop isn't perfect but he has managed to make the nasty choices needed to keep Nokia alive. The once 'in the red' networking division has managed to return to making a profit. Their mapping technology is being used in more places too. This deal works really well for Nokia as they are able to shed the part of the company that was dragging them down - the device portion.

    63. Re:Hmm... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The patents were handed over to a joint venture run by Microsoft and Apple jointly. Yes it will operate like Intellectual Ventures, but it will be used specifically to target competition to the two owners.

    64. Re:Hmm... by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      EMBED - EXHAUST - ENVELOPE

    65. Re:Hmm... by terjeber · · Score: 1

      You must be joking. Nokia was dead long before Elop came on board. Something had to be done. Symbian was a dysfunctional piece of junk on smartphones and there was no replacement in sight (emphasis on "in sight" - it was in their dream, but there was no ability within Nokia to actually deliver). We'll see what happens to the Nokia pieces now, but Elop had nothing to do with the demise of Nokia, he came on board long after the ship had started sinking.

    66. Re:Hmm... by terjeber · · Score: 1

      despite the fact that Microsoft's failed strategy and partnership with Nokia is what caused Nokia's failure

      Nonsense and rubbish. Nokia had failed long before Elop came on board. Going Microsoft had nothing to do with that.

    67. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Nokia's] failing because it filled good hardware with Microsoft's software

      I still don't see what else they could've done.

      Meego simply didn't have the firepower to hold its own against monolith-backed OSes from Cupertino or Mountain View. It's a well-designed OS which - at its surface - looked little different from Android and iOS's "icon grid", and at its core lacked the services-based backend a large software company is able to provide. I don't know that Nokia would have been able to curate or support Meego on the same level that Apple, Google, and Microsoft can, due to their ecosystems.

      Android phones are a dime-a-dozen, and Samsung's dominating that space due to its ability to out-market their devices over higher-quality alternatives from HTC and out-compensate salespeople in carrier stores. I doubt that Nokia entering the Android space with the Lumia line would have lent them the success necessary to _not_ drop in value/market share.

    68. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Microsoft does have a strategy to succeed in the mobile space. They already make more money with this strategy than on selling windows mobile.

      Microsoft is a patent troll, who sues successful Android handset makers.

      If this deal gives them access to Nokia's patent trove, then these attacks, by Microsoft, on folks who are actually building things that people want, are sure to get worse.

    69. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you found any mentions of the shareholders planning to sue Nokia's board of directors?

    70. Re:Hmm... by mirix · · Score: 1

      From start of 2010 until mid 2012, prices went from ~$15 to a low of $1.70 or so. It's recovered some, since then, but what terrible performance. That was more like a 90% reduction in value.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    71. Re:Hmm... by mirix · · Score: 1

      They also make / service the things that the phones talk to. That part of the business isn't included in the deal.

      I think it's less hardware now, more consulting and the like. Probably fat patent royalties as well, being one of the innovators in the industry. I seem to think siemens is hooked up with that end of the business as well.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    72. Re: Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about McDonalds?

      They can put Nokia phones in Happy Meals.

    73. Re:Hmm... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      and if they brought back the Kin name, that would be double-awesome, surely.

      The PhoneKinZune by Microsoft.

  7. Indestructible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they are looking for the Nokia 3310 indestructibility features to put on Windows.

  8. Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Suddenly, the big money is being earned from hardware (a reversal of the PC industry, where hardware companies slugged it out for razor thin margins and software makers raked in billions). Both Google and Microsoft recently purchased established phone hardware manufacturers. While many hypothesized that they did it to compete with Apple, I think they did it to combat the threat from companies like Samsung, LG and HTC. If you look at Apple's sales figures, the reason is crystal clear: the iPhone is both their highest margin and most profitable product. There is no point in Google and Microsoft doing all the hard work to build and maintain a mobile operating system only to have companies like Samsung walk away with tens of billions of dollars in profit from premium handset sales each quarter. Google, Apple and Microsoft want to dominate the flagship handset market with a handful of must-have devices each year, forcing Korean and Taiwanese companies into the low end.

    1. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Nokia has been losing billions on Windows phones. Never made a dime of profit on that, even after their "platform support payments".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Dzimas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure. Currently, only Apple and Samsung are making money in this market. Google plans to join them. And now Microsoft is moi ing the party. This wouldn't be the first time that MS has come from behind: Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s, Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status, Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company, and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry. Now, they're trailing in the mobile market. They have $68 billion in the bank, a solid hardware manufacturer in their back pocket. Next up? My guess is that they'll take a page out of Google's Nexus playbook (ugh, bad pun) and release surprisingly solid mid-range handsets at very good prices until things stick.

    3. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's vastly easier to acquire a company when it is failing... People have been known to sabotage a company just to drop the stock prices to the point that they can buy a controlling interest in that company, then stop the bleeding and turn things around.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Keruo · · Score: 1

      a solid hardware manufacturer in their back pocket. Next up?

      Well, if you look what happened with Palm deal and Windows Mobile, it's not hard to guess what happens next..

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    5. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or the LG deal (2009). Or the Motorola deal (2003). Or the Nortel deal. Or the Verizon deal. Or the Ericsson deal. Or the Sendo deal.

    6. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know what's sad? Nokia's smartphone division, back in the Symbian days, was consistently profitable. They used to sell more phones than Apple and Samsung put together. Since the move to Windows Phone, they were never profitable. Not a single semester out of the red... except that one time when they sold a building and did some scuzzy math with that.

    7. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by NickFortune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This wouldn't be the first time that MS has come from behind: Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s, Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status, Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company, and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry

      Hmm. Of course most of those victories were achieved at least in part by leveraging MS' control of the underlying operating system. Admittedly the Xbox didn't have that advantage. That said, while the platform is certainly making money, it's still not clear that MS have recouped the massive investment they needed to brute force their way into the market.

      This situation is different again. MS aren't competing against Apple, Google and Samsung. They're competing against Apple and Android. Every hardware manufacturer in the far east is eyeing Android and thinking "we could sell our phones under our own brand". So all the hardware guys that usually support are potential competitors. That's on top of Apple, Google and Samsung.

      Even worse, they're pretty much tied to the windows brand for whatever phone they use. So the symbol that everyone sees when they're bored at school in computer class and the one that everyone sees when they're bored at work and wishing they were elsewhere doing something, anything else ... that's going to be the brand on the phone. All the Nokia ads I say downplayed the Windows brand as far as possible, which I think was clever of them. But I don't think MS' corporate pride will allow that.

      What might save them in this market is big business. If they can get some large corporations to declare themselves as winphone shops and make everyone use the platform for all work related activities they could use that to make inroads into education and home use. But the business dudes all have iPhones or Android already and it works for them. It's going to be hard work getting them to give up those machines for windows. Especially with BYOD as an emerging trend.

      If you ask me, their best hope might be to launch an Xbox phone. Xbox users tend to like the platform; load it up with plenty of free mobile games and they could build a user base pretty quickly, to say nothing of finally finding takers for their app store. But that wouldn't get them a "serious" offering so I don't think they'll do it.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    8. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Microsoft would never do the only thing that would turn things around for Nokia: killing Windows Phone and making devices with an OS that wasn't almost universally rejected by consumers.

    9. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .... Nokia's smartphone division, back in the Symbian days, was consistently profitable. They used to sell more phones than Apple and Samsung put together. ....

      This bit of your comment is the trick. Mobile phones is a scale game. The largest producer gets the cheapest components; gets to share large fixed development costs over more phones; has more buying power for production and even gets to partially control the retail channel. Apple managed to change that by dividing the market into high end smartphones and the rest for a little while which allowed them to gain an edge; Android changes that a little bit since multiple manufacturers buy together; still the principle is sound.

      The only good news with this is that this is almost certain to be an infinite money sink for Microsoft. Think about enough fail to drag the entire company down into the ditch.

    10. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Nokia used to be a solid hardware manufacturer. One of Elop's bone-headed moves was to move to the same outsourced manufacturing model as the competition.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    11. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Error27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google bought Motorola for the patents. Microsoft bought Nokia because everyone else had almost abandoned Windows phones and Nokia was about to abandon them as well.

      Only Samsung and Apple make money from phones. Nokia, HTC, Blackberry, and Motorola all make a loss. Btw, Nokia and HTC are 9th and 10th on the top smartphone list. Blackberry and Motorola aren't in the top ten.

      At this point the phone business has turned into the PC business. Phones are a commodity. They all have 300-400 ppi screens. Anything higher than that is silly. The screens are all as large as you can hold comfortably. They all have the same CPU and and the same RAM and the same battery life. It's easy to design a high end phone.

      For some reason it's harder to make money with smartphones than with PCs. You have to first become one of the few subsidized phones. I think the phone companies know you have to go through them so they don't pay very well?

    12. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      the difference now is that everybody's used Microsoft's software for a couple of decades, and have decided that they really would rather use something else when given the option.

      MS didn't make a fortune in the console industry, the amount they paid to make the xbox successful has roughly only just been paid back. Any other company (ie without a big sugar daddy parent company) would have been bankrupt long ago. That's how 'successful' xbox has really been.

    13. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The xbox had that advantage to a degree, as it made it easier to port games to or from windows...

      Being big in business hasn't really helped blackberry, work devices are considered boring and people don't want to use the same thing at home.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by real-modo · · Score: 1

      the difference now is that everybody's used Microsoft's software for a couple of decades, and have decided that they really would rather use something else when given the option.

      Yeah, it turns out that people like choice. Who knew?

      More fundamentally, there are no economic "network effects" in mobile. Way back when, everybody started using Word and Excel because everybody else was using them. To be able to exchange documents, and to have access to tech support people with teh skillz, you needed to use what everyone else used.

      With mobile, the data's all in the cloud, and there're several apps to choose from, on both iOS and Android. And the browser is always there, too. Tech support? Buy another one.

      No lock-in, except for any investment in phone apps, which is usually trivial by comparison with what we paid for desktop apps back in the day.

      In mobile, the very best Microsoft can hope for is a third of the market, and a perpetual dogfight to keep it. A dogfight in which it's an arthritic poodle.

    15. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by horza · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft crushed its competition via illegal and immoral tactics by controlling the underlying operating system. Throwing up fake error messages when running rival products to make them seem unstable, using hidden APIs to give their own products an unnassailable advantage, even pretending IE was built into the OS to ensure it came pre-bundled onto every computer. The one I didn't like was when a new company announced a great new product, Microsoft would fake having the same product coming out shortly after. Everybody would wait for the "official" Microsoft version, the new company would go bankrupt, and Microsoft would buy them for pennies and release their software.

      On an even playing field Microsoft has never done so well. On phones and tablets their propensity to launch slow and buggy products has come back to bite them. The Xbox did ok but they took an awful hit to get it where it is today. The best product they ever made was their mouse, so I guess they can do hardware :-)

      Phillip.

    16. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I think what you describe is the last time Microsoft will ever be [allowed] to pull that stuff off.

      Word did not crush Word Perfect. Microsoft [ab]used their Windows monopoly to harm a competing product.

      Microsoft's multiple attempts into mobile have all been disgraceful failures and they've been making attempts for decades. Microsoft screwed over Orange mobile more than once (really Orange? And you're still playing with Microsoft?) and Microsoft accused of stealing mobile phone trade secrets as they go back on their deals [again] with another Microsoft partnership gone bad.

      I see the term "Microsoft Partner" as the thing which happens before something bad happens... you know, like getting kissed by a mafia boss or something.

    17. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hardware is still solid if nothing else; you can drive over the lumia 920 with a car and it still looks and works like new.

    18. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by MrDoh! · · Score: 2

      MS bought Nokia for the patents too. The Apple/Samsung battles are going to be nothing compared to the upcoming GoogleSamsung/MicrosoftNokia wars. We've even seen the opening salvos, now the big guns are being brought up.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    19. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s

      Because, among other things, Word had a two year head start on a Windows version. This head start was in part because of Windows being relatively new. WordPerfect Corporation, like many other companies, were slow to market. Microsoft will be first to market on Windows Phone because the market is not very interesting right now. Microsoft is going in to a relatively mature market, where the only way Windows and Office help is by providing fuck loads of cash to throw down the hole. Granted, having fuck loads of cash is pretty useful.

      Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status

      Yes, and again, helped by the rise of Windows. Lotus, like WordPerfect Corporation, experienced significant delays in getting in to the Windows market. As mentioned earlier, this is not situation they find themselves in with Windows Phone. If Microsoft do get to market a year before the competition it's similar to a man boasting of being the first man to fuck a handful of human shit. The reason he, and Microsoft, would be first is that no-one else wants it, and it can't lead to anything good.

      Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company

      Again, on the back of Windows. You might recall some little anti-trust hearings. Assuming Microsoft decided to revive the Gates playbook, how would it do this with Windows Phone, and why is this even relevant to the current situation? Don't get me wrong, Explorer, Excel and Word were actually good products. I was a Netscape user until it was patently obvious that Explorer had surpassed Navigator in performance and features. The thing is, being good wasn't enough. All of the examples so far benefited significantly from their being tied to Windows, and only a fucking idiot would cite Explorer as an example relevant to the market Windows Phone seeks to break.

      and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry

      Uh, this is generally not tied to Windows, so, uh, well done? Also, this is probably closer to the phone market than any of the other examples! You're right that people were surprised, and very wrong in saying that they've made a "fortune in the console industry". How is being a few billion in the hole now classed as making a fortune?

      Fuck me, are you a time travelling from the dot.com bubble period? I'm sorry to tell you this: 3 billion dollar losses since inception does not count as making a fortune. They've built a market for Xbox and are seeing profit, but not sufficient to cover their investment. It's going to nearer to a 2017 before they make back their money. 10 fucking years of pouring cash down a hole is pretty expensive marketshare.

      How about Bing? Yeah, that's going well. Give that another five years and they might be in the black. You see a pattern here? No, you don't do you? Let me give you an analogy... Have you ever been camping or hiking? Ever seen those people who know fuck all about either of these things, but think buying a bunch of expensive gear will compensate for this? That guy is Microsoft. Yeah, that's him - the overweight cunt in the camo gear, who fucked up your peaceful walk by roaring through the forest on a quad bike.

      Need to learn to use a map and compass? Fuck that, he's got GPS. Anyway he'll use his cell phone if he gets lost. He'll repeatedly get lost and have to be picked-up by park rangers. He'll try to impress his friends by doing some shit he saw on Discovery Channel, and will end up tripping balls after drinking from a cactus, and will again his naked and confused ass will be saved by someone else.

      That is Microsoft entering a new market - loaded with cash and light on a need to actually turn a profit anytime soon. This doesn't mean that their products are bad - Xbox is a decent console if you ignore the need to pay for a Live Gold sub in order to use functionali

    20. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS made a fortune in the console industry? Well, while this is technically true the XBox is still running at a massive loss for Microsoft. Any money they have made hasn't really put a dent in what it has so far cost them. While I have no figures to prove it (and am probably talking partly from my arse) I would estimate that they are still about $5 billion in the red concerning the XBox. People talk about the 360 making profits but these were never enough to cover the original debt.

    21. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Make a fortune in the console industry?
      My understanding is that has not happened. They move profit into the entertainment division by sticking unrelated stuff in it.

    22. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft crushed its competition via illegal and immoral tactics

      Shut the fuck up. Business is business. It's a dog eat dog world out there. If you can't handle the heat don't play with fire. Quite whining like a baby.

    23. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Actually, while the Xbox wasn't about the OS, it was still about software. The Xbox wasn't all that popular. The Xbox 360 however most certainly was, and perhaps one good reason was that it was easy to develop for. The hardware was closer to PCs than the PS3 while still being powerful and conventional enough compared to the Wii. The software dev kits were a lot better than anything Sony could ever provide.

    24. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't be the first time that MS has come from behind: Word utterly crushed Word Perfect to become the standard in the early 90s, Excel pushed Lotus 1-2-3 into has-been status, Internet Explorer killed Netscape as a viable company, and people were surprised when MS released the Xbox and went on to make a fortune in the console industry.

      There are some important differences you're overlooking. WordPerfect and Lotus fell off the radar because they completely botched the transition from text mode to GUI when that was the way the industry was trending. Of course, the fact that Microsoft controlled the most popular GUI helped them here. With Netscape, we're all familiar with the dirty tricks they used, but these tricks relied on the fact that they were leveraging their OS monopoly to kick out competition in the browser arena. They have no comparable leverage in smartphones/tablets. As for the Xbox, they managed to become a competitor – one of three players, not an overwhelming victor. And there's no evidence that they have actually made a net profit on consoles, especially when you consider the time value of money. MS stockholders might well have been better off if all the money spent on the Xbox series had instead been returned as dividends.

    25. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Word did not crush Word Perfect. Microsoft [ab]used their Windows monopoly to harm a competing product.

      Please. The problem is that the WordPerfect developers and management saw GUIs as a fad, and were too late to the party. Much like Microsoft has done with the phone and tablet markets, in fact.

      No version of WordPerfect for Windows was even released at all until 2 full years after MS Winword came out. Granted, the MS programmers had some advantages since they were working for the same company and had access to staff on the other side of the building to ask questions and get help, but plenty of other companies had working Windows software out quicker than that.

      WordPerfect also had crappy management. The free online book "Almost Perfect" was written by one of the top brass – he doesn't seem to realize how bad it makes him look. He treated his employees like garbage – button-down Mormon 9-to-5 crap with mediocre salaries, few opportunities for advancement, and no profit sharing. In the dot-com era, how did he think this was going to work out?

    26. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Are you an MS shill? Talking about a few examples of software packages from the 90's and then how when they embedded IE into their OS that lead to them being convicted monopolist is your example?

      And please, detail how much of a "fortune" did they make with the Xbox? I really would love to see the numbers you have because they lost a ton of money for years on that project and we can really have some fun talking about how they did with their new console's "features".

      Downvote this shill.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    27. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      I'm not a shill, and definitely not a Microsoft fan. You need to get it into your head that companies you don't like which sometimes engage in unethical or monopolistic practices can be extremely successful in the marketplace. Just because someone says, "They have been able to come from behind in the past and they might be able to do it again" doesn't mean that person likes the company or approves of the way it runs.

    28. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will NEVER make money on the XBox platform overall. They lost close to 8 Billion dollars before they started _small_ quarterly profits which will never ever recoup the money lost. And you need to keep in mind when you talk about profits that has only happened because they extended the typical 5 year console cycle to 7 years and just a year after starting to make a profit they are going to start the loss cycle all over again by starting the new console cycle they delayed.

      There is a reason Microsoft doesn't break out XBox revenue in their stock reports, the investors would lynch management for the colossal waste of money.

    29. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The Xbox did ok but they took an awful hit to get it where it is today.

      Has the XBox reached a profitable point yet? Last I heard, it was still a huge money loser. Sure, it managed to get some of the market, but that's not quite a huge success if it doesn't make money.

    30. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think your analysis is a little misleading. It's not like they were doing great, they suddenly switched to Windows out of nowhere, and then everything fell apart. For those with short memories:

      The iPhone really shook up with mobile phone market, and most phone manufacturers fought back by making Android phones. Most of the market became iPhone vs. Android, and there wasn't much room for anything else. Companies like Microsoft, Nokia, RIM took a huge hit, not so much because they did any particular thing wrong, but because they missed the starting gun, and didn't start running until Apple and Samsung had lapped them twice.

    31. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Only Samsung and Apple make money from phones. Nokia, HTC, Blackberry, and Motorola all make a loss. Btw, Nokia and HTC are 9th and 10th on the top smartphone list. Blackberry and Motorola aren't in the top ten.

      Who are #3 - #8, by the way? I don't think I know that many smartphone brands!

    32. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Error27 · · Score: 1

      1 Samsung
      2 Apple
      3 LG
      4 Lenovo
      5 Huawei
      6 ZTE
      7 Sony
      8 Coolpad/Yulong
      9 Nokia
      10 HTC
      11 Blackberry

      After that then you have a dozen other Asian brands selling Android phones. Samsung and Apple control 50% of the market.

    33. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      You did nothing to refute the points that I made that show you for being a shill. Instead you attack me. Classic shill move.

      I need to do NOTHING that a shill like you tells me to do. I've been around long enough to have used computers before MS clawed its way to the top via some, yes smart moves, but a hell of a lot of shady moves that ended up in them being a convicted monopolist.

      It was because of a change in our government that allowed them to escape any real punishment for being a convicted monopolist and solidify those practices.

      Only now with the advance of mobile devices, that MS has failed multiple times at, are we likely going to see a change in the power dynamic that they setup. However they do have a ton of cash reserves so they can afford to continue to try to enter markets where they see growth even if they are a day late and nearly a billion dollars short of a write of on.

      Go away shill, I know more than you.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    34. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will NEVER make money on the XBox platform overall. They lost close to 8 Billion dollars before they started _small_ quarterly profits which will never ever recoup the money lost.

      Thanks. That was more or less my understanding of the matter, but I couldn't back it up and I didn't have time to dig out the numbers.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    35. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a shill, and definitely not a Microsoft fan. You need to get it into your head that companies you don't like which sometimes engage in unethical or monopolistic practices can be extremely successful in the marketplace. Just because someone says, "They have been able to come from behind in the past and they might be able to do it again" doesn't mean that person likes the company or approves of the way it runs.

      I don't think you're a shill, but you are clutching at straws. I get that an companies with a history of unethical and monopolistic practices can be successful, but what does that even mean in this context? It's irrelevant. What? Microsoft helped Explorer's market share by bundling it with Windows, ergo Windows Phone will succeed? It establishes that in a specific instance they were able to come from behind, and this is all it establishes! I did a 20km walk. Does this mean I can swim 10 laps of the pool? No it doesn't, yet this is comparable to the fractured connections you draw.

      And seriously, Microsoft is making a fortune in the console market? That claim suggests either a shill or a very uninformed person. I'm leaning towards the latter.

    36. Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'd be thought less of a shill if you'd actually respond when numerous posters have been pointing out the "errors" in your claims.

      You're either colossally uninformed or you're pissing on our shoes and telling us its raining.

      Making a fortune on consoles? Sure, and I'm a teapot.
      Hitler lives inside my spout. He emerges three times per day to belch the Belgian national anthem at passing schools of salmon.

      The problem is that you're incredibly wrong, and you're handwaving away facts and reason in support of the idea that Microsoft could corner a decent chunk of the phone business. Why are you doing this, and why are your arguments barely better than my fish worrying belching belgian fuhrerpot?

  9. Foulplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hopefully some Institution will show that buyout the red card. I was obvious that Elop was destroying Nokia for a cheaper buyout by Microsoft. Some People really should go to Jail this time.

  10. A sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Swedish and not Finnish but this still makes me feel sad. I've owned many Nokia phones through the years. My first few phones, the iconic 3310 and and recently an N900 were Nokias. I've suspected this would happen since the post-Maemo fiasco and MS boss debacle, but this marks the definitive end of an era. Oh well... Life moves on.

    1. Re:A sad day by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You can watch the Nokia press conference here in two hours from right now.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:A sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you will appreciate Windows Phone one day. Jut give it time, it really is better.

    3. Re:A sad day by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Just don't forget to use lubricant and apply anesthetic in case of severe discomfort.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
    4. Re:A sad day by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Does that really matter, assuming it was even true?

      Consumers are put off by the name, windows has a reputation for being unreliable, buggy and virus prone... Consumers put up with that on computers because they don't think any alternatives exist, but alternative phones are well known.

      Some of us are put off by the fact that its from microsoft, a company well known to engage in underhanded tactics.. It doesn't matter how good their products are, some of us will never buy them because we remember the damage microsoft can do if they gain too much control in a market.

      Personally i find it highly amusing to see microsoft getting a taste of what they've been dishing out all these years...

      Mobile websites designed for webkit that are broken on windows phone...
      Google locking them out of youtube...
      Lack of applications, and developers unwilling to port to such a niche platform...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:A sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Phone is useless shit

    6. Re:A sad day by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Nokia is definitely Finnish[ed].

  11. The End of Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft succeeded in its strategy to take-down and take-over a major phone rival. First plant a CEO to destroy the company and lower its shares.... wait... and take over the company. What is left of Nokia is not likely to survive as they all had synergies with the devices unit, which will be taken-over by Microsoft.

    Clearly, Nokia had problems when Elop took over... but he destroyed any potential Nokia had left (think N9/MeeGo). And now he gutted the company even further and will take the devices unit with him as a rejoins the Microsoft family he was clearly so fond of. The poor must have really missed his family.

    1. Re:The End of Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is more than that, with the 808 Pureview, even Symbian had caught up to the level of iOS and Android at the time.

  12. Struggling What to Say... by philovivero · · Score: 2

    ...I keep trying but no matter how hard I work at it, no useful syllables are formed.

    This probably encompasses the user experience of an MSNokia phone, so maybe that's apropos.

    1. Re:Struggling What to Say... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      This probably encompasses the user experience of an MSNokia phone, so maybe that's apropos.

      I can speak just fine, thanks. I'm looking forward to buying my next Nokia/Windows Phone, if that's what you were wondering.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  13. Countdown to shareholder lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24, 23, 21...

    1. Re:Countdown to shareholder lawsuits by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If it was ever going to happen, it should have happened years ago.

  14. New patent troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my understanding of this is that Nokia is now little more than a huge collection of patents worth supposedly truck loads of cash. Does this ring alarms for anyone else?

    1. Re:New patent troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would, if they didn't have a core business with the networks. And at least potentially with Maps.

    2. Re:New patent troll by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Do you know the scam game with three cups and a pea? Where you win money if you guess right under which cup the pea is after some shuffling?

      The "Nokia basic essential mobile telecom patents" pea is no longer under the Nokia cup for some time now. It's now under the cup labelled "Vringo or I/P Engine". Watch where that cup moves and when the pea gets exchanged.
      Here's an older article on Groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20130601134450374

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  15. And the circle is complete by chickybrick · · Score: 1

    By this point Nokia was basically a Microsoft division anyway, just without the official ownership (though there was proxy ownership via Elop). This was going to happen soon or later. It's an interesting situation though - who would license Windows Phone now that it's seen as a loser in the market AND Microsoft would be competing with you?

    1. Re:And the circle is complete by Stormwatch · · Score: 0

      I think licensees were just paying lip service to Microsoft anyway. They're probably happy to have a good excuse to kill their WP products now!

    2. Re:And the circle is complete by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Apart from the patents MS is about to hit them with. It might not be a choice to go with Android, but being forced to A) stop business, B) churn out sub-par WP phones. Many will decide it's not worth it and leave, opening up more sales to Microsoftia, which will be more profitable. If they do stick it out with Android, they'll be paying a huge 'tithe' to MS for the patent rights.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
  16. Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Uzull · · Score: 1

    With the strong influence Microsoft has on big corporation's IT (Exchange/Office/Outlook) it would not surprise me that within one or two we would see strongly integrated phones for those corporations. If they make some attractive, usefull and secure phones (Nokia WP are hardware wise very attractive...), Microsoft could wipe out Blackberry.

    1. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft could wipe out Blackberry.

      Yeah, that'd be quite the accomplishment.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Therad · · Score: 1

      Wp market share is actually bigger than blackberry at the moment. And I don't understand why MS didn't release WP7 & 8 as THE business phone instead of trying to break into the saturated consumer market. If they had done that, they could probably take a large chunk of the consumer market afterwards.

    3. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      . And I don't understand why MS didn't release WP7 & 8 as THE business phone instead of trying to break into the saturated consumer market. If they had done that, they could probably take a large chunk of the consumer market afterwards.

      As far as I'm concerned, WP8 IS the business phone OS (that's why I use them). The Exchange and Office integration is second to none.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If they had pushed for MeeGo, they could be on par with iOS now, maybe rivaling Android even. Instead, they're left with the crumbs.

    5. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft could wipe out Blackberry.

      Yeah, that'd be quite the accomplishment.

      Ah, BlackBerry. That is another company that used to be very strong, but has been run into the ground by a string of idiotic decisions. Only sabotage can explain BlackBerry's behavior over the last few years. Probably another take down/take over operation.

    6. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it a step backwards from both on the n9 and even n900? There have been complaints about that.

    7. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I don't know what those are, actually. I meant that the Windows Phone has the best Exchange and Office integration on the market now.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I would fscking hope so, all of these things being Microsoft products.

    9. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Try googling it - some non-MS nokia phones, even going back to the sybian ones like the "communicator" had a selling point of Exchange and Office integration. When Nokia moved to WP7 there were a large number of new problems with Exchange and Office integration and some persisted to WP8.

    10. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      When Nokia moved to WP7 there were a large number of new problems with Exchange and Office integration and some persisted to WP8.

      The only problem that I can see is that the sticky notes don't sync. Are there other problems? I use it pretty much all day, every day, and I don't see any other problems.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works just fine on (most/all?) Android and Apple phones, too. I really wonder what you think makes the integration any better than what every other smartphone offers nowadays?
      Actually iOS has worked very will with corporate VPNs since ages, which should it exist in WP by now is a rather new feature.

    12. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Well, except that Windows Phone 8 is completely terrible for large business at this time, as they don't support very common functions that business is looking for that iOS and Android do.

      If they wanted to become the phone for business, they should start by listening to what business is trying to accomplish with a phone, and then making a platform actually capable of doing that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    13. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by Uzull · · Score: 1

      Or buy what remains of Blackberry and use that as a basis... The future will tell if this buy was fruitfull... MS missed so many opportunities in the past...

    14. Re:Nokia Phones by MS = New Blackberry? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Even that wouldn't work, because businesses everywhere are busy ripping out the BES servers in favor of ActiveSync reverse proxies and MDM solutions, which universally work better with iOS and Android than Windows Phone does.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  17. aaaaand..... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ....the other she drops.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:aaaaand..... by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shoe! The other shoe drops. Yeesh.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:aaaaand..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, `she' was better.

    3. Re:aaaaand..... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      That's what shoe sed.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  18. MS will be free to dump more money into WP by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft has been paying Nokia $1B/year. As part of a much larger organization, it will be much easier to hide how much money Microsoft is dumping into Windows Phone, including support for marketing and selling handsets below cost.

    Nokia handsets, meet XBox!

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:MS will be free to dump more money into WP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You break it you buy it.

    2. Re:MS will be free to dump more money into WP by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      That's just a bit less than the U.S. uses to bribe countries.

    3. Re:MS will be free to dump more money into WP by joseph90 · · Score: 1

      Or in microsofts case: You buy it you break it.
      J.

  19. Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If this happened to a major Australian company the Australian Federal government would have a big say in approving the purchase. Does Finland have similar laws?

    1. Re:Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      If anything Microsoft could just leave an office or just change the name on the building. The government would just really care about employing their constituents and bringing/keeping tax money into the country.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    2. Re:Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If Google-Motorola was any indication, this will be tied up in court for well over a year. This will get a lot of scrutiny. Also, it does smell of desparation on the part of MS, since Nokia was their last major phone vendor. If Nokia had gone under, MS phone division would have been invisible. This keeps the dream alive a little bit longer.

    3. Re:Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The government would just really care about employing their constituents

      That's the entire point. Nokia under Elop was cuttting or moving offshore a lot of employment of their constituents leaving not much else other than a head office and some development - both of which are likely to go offshore now.

    4. Re: Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      True, but now Microsoft got what they wanted. IMHO Microsoft did what they did to get a rock bottom price. Now they can just have it as a European sattelite office and close one down somewhere else. Same payroll just different people charging the taxes.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    5. Re: Foreign purchase rules in Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokias Tampere campus is located nicely right next to Tampere University of Technology. It's a great place for R&D, lots of cheap well educated engineers, and engineering students. The city of Tampere will also most likely bend over to keep the jobs in the area.

  20. After this by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    what will be left of Nokia?

    1. Re:After this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm I have been to Nokia HQ.... to the left of it is some water..... ...about the same value as Nokia itself after Elop has run away with the heart of Nokia.

    2. Re:After this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much.

    3. Re:After this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maps, patents and nokia-siemens networks (NSN).

  21. We saw it coming by ecloud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked at Nokia from 2011-2012. Everyone was saying then that the reason for Elop (who was otherwise so useless) was to devalue Nokia enough that it would be a good deal for Microsoft. And here we are... the other shoe drops. But there will be a third shoe when he becomes CEO of Microsoft. They deserve each other.

    1. Re:We saw it coming by dyfet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its not that anyone didn't see this coming, both inside and outside Nokia. I wrote at that time that clearly Elop was doing the same thing Belluzo did to SGI, all the time working for Microsoft's benefit, not the shareholders of Nokia. And that the reason he would go along and do so is that he was promised to be Ballmer's heir when he returned after Microsoft purchased Nokia cheaply. But where are the Finnish authorities in all this? They should arrest that thug for securities fraud if nothing else, and run him out of the country.

    2. Re:We saw it coming by real-modo · · Score: 1

      But there will be a third shoe when he becomes CEO of Microsoft. They deserve each other.

      I'm curious: Elop's special skill is selling the companies he (nominally) runs. Macromedia to Adobe, and now Nokia to Microsoft.

      Who would he sell Microsoft to, if he got to be Microsoft's CE? Anyone have ideas?

    3. Re:We saw it coming by real-modo · · Score: 1

      Never mind. People have made suggestions up-thread, while I was looking at the squirrel.

      Please carry on.

    4. Re:We saw it coming by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Who would he sell Microsoft to, if he got to be Microsoft's CE? Anyone have ideas?

      NSA or some of its affiliate companies. They aren't fully assimilated yet, so could make sense that an arm of the money printing machine buys it.

    5. Re:We saw it coming by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Elop was doing the same thing Belluzo did to SGI

      So that's why SGI started making those dreadful SGI320 windows workstations (you had to install NT4 then upgrade to 2000, but I guess that was better than the regular IRIX install procedure)?

    6. Re:We saw it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I worked at Nokia from 2011-2012. Everyone was saying then that the reason for Elop (who was otherwise so useless) was to devalue Nokia enough that it would be a good deal for Microsoft. And here we are... the other shoe drops. But there will be a third shoe when he becomes CEO of Microsoft. They deserve each other.

      I doubt that buying Nokia cheaply was the plan. In fact, I'm sure that Nokia is considered an acceptable loss. The real plan was for Nokia to successfully market a MSFT WinPhone and for Elop to be the next CEO of Microsoft on the shoulders of appreciative Nokia employees. By MSFT leaving to be CEO of another company he gained a certain amount of street cred as CEO. You see this time and time, again, in business. It's nothing new.

      Elop obviously has powerful friends at MSFT, powerful enough to cover his mistakes (with shareholder money) and make them look like an organized plan. It's the old adage, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Most management moves are explained by stupidity. My guess is that he will do nothing new for MSFT and will be gifted with bonuses for his success.

    7. Re:We saw it coming by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was Elop's fault that the Symbian team couldn't put together a usable smartphone interface no matter how much money they put into it. It was also Elop's fault that the Symbian alternative was sabotaged internally by the Symbian team for years. Nokia pre-Elop simply wasn't able to deliver anything but feature phones. They were not competing in the Smartphone business at all, and there was no chance they ever would be given the situation at the time.

      Did Elop make it worse? I don't think so, but it is difficulr to know. Going on the path it was at the time, Nokia would be a feature-phone supplier to poor countries onl today with zero presence in the smartphone space. Today they have a small presence, and growing. Would it have been enough to save Nokia? We'll never know. What we do know however is that Nokia was doomed before Elop came on board. Its demice had nothing to do with him.

  22. So wait... by taxtropel · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight...the same man, who single-handedly ended Nokia's push into open source software and at the same time drove Nokia into oblivion is coming to run Microsoft? That will work out well.

    1. Re:So wait... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

      We can only hope! (shame about Nokia)

      --
      Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
  23. Crazy is... by edelbrp · · Score: 1

    as crazy does.

  24. Glad they Sold Off Qt First by GumphMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am certainly glad they sold off Qt first. If Microsoft got their hands on it the writing would be on the wall even in the face of pledges to KDE.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't do MS any good really. The KDE Free Qt Foundation (http://www.kde.org/community/whatiskde/kdefreeqtfoundation.php) agreement basically means that the owner of Qt can't close it off. Not without triggering a BSD licensed Qt release.

    2. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      in a way this is a shame, Qt is so vastly superior to MS's WPF technology (think - all the power of XAML and all the ease of use of winforms, and MS could have had this if their stupid divisions weren't fighting each other) could have kick-started a proper GUI environment. You know they're still slugging it out with win32/winforms.WPF/and now the WinRT XAML (not to mention failures such as silverlight).

      Having Qt could have let them save face and release a decent GUI system. Such a shame for MS they didn't think things through when they sent Elop over there.

    3. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by paugq · · Score: 2

      Except for that BSD-licensed Qt release would be X11-only, no Windows, Mac, VxWorks, QNX, etc

    4. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      QT..superior to WPF.. Uhh, lolwut? You are delusional.

    5. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by oiron · · Score: 1

      Except that's not what the agreement says - it mentions only the Qt Free Edition, so it's everything.

    6. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by chickybrick · · Score: 1

      It is though. At the very least it has the virtue of being cross-platform, making it much easier to write cross-platform GUI applications in the first place compared to WPF. Of course such a benefit is less useful for Microsoft who only want their own platforms to dominate, but from a developer/user point of view it's much better.

    7. Re:Glad they Sold Off Qt First by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      you need to go compare, just because WPF is the flagship GUI tech from Microsoft doesn't mean its the dogs danglies.

      There are many problems with its performance, for starters. Then there's the issue that the XAML code itself is practically inpenetrable - it might as well have been a binary protocol to describe the widgets in many cases (I especially think of where its used in TFS to describe the build workflow - truly awful).

      But the biggest thing for me is that where Qt allowed you to write user controls in their QML language, with javascript as the code-behind language, you can drop these usercontrols onto a basic form, with the API to these controls the same as that used for everything. There's a lot of similarity between the two.

      Imagine if MS had allowed you to write a usercontrol in WPF and then place it onto a winforms form and access it like any other control. One thing about winforms is that its really easy to work with (and doesn't require those horrible bindings or nasty event delegates or that INotifyPropertyChanged nonsense). Now add the power of a WPF usercontrol and you'd have something great.

      Qt's QML is a lot like WPF, but done right. You should check it out sometime, it might open your eyes to how good stuff outside the closed microsoft world is.

  25. Does anyone really believe... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    the EU will let this happen?

    I don't think so, and it does have major antitrust repercussions.

    1. Re:Does anyone really believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand the details, but I think they only applies if they operate in the same space. For example if MS already build/sold phones, this would increase their market share in the phone space. Expanding into new areas is acceptable.

      Of course the line between phones and tablets and some of the services existing/aquired is a little blurry.

  26. Inspiring... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How I read the open letter:

    "Nokia has an identity spanning 150 years of heritage, innovation, excellence, and change. That ends today. By this evening those 150 years will be a rumor. They never happened. Think about that. Today is history. Today will be remembered. Years from now, the young will ask with wonder about this day. Today is history, and you are part of it..."

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Inspiring... by havana9 · · Score: 2

      They are still making winter tyres. They're quite good.

    2. Re:Inspiring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Inspiring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst that's the true Nokia, it's actually a company completely independent of the Nokia group. Nokian is not the same as Nokia. It was sold off from Nokia during a much earlier crisis in the same company.

  27. Mission Accomplished Mr. Elop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.

  28. NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft will now add a NSA backdoor into every Nokia phone.

    1. Re:NSA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Your calls, any data use and offered encryption will be US gov friendly.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  29. He Never Sold his House in Redmond by Mr+Europe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you find it peculiar the Elop never sold his house in Redmond and his family didn't move to Finland though Stephen said hey would ? Can you avoid thinking of a conspiracy ?

    1. Re:He Never Sold his House in Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't. Nobody cares. It doesn't make any difference.

    2. Re:He Never Sold his House in Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a claim to migrate some place then changing your mind is hardly a cause for conspiracy. How do you know that the Elop family didn't get cold feet about migrating to a new land with new culture and a new language?

  30. If Nokia wasn't already backdoored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if Nokia isn't already backdoored, it will be as soon as MS gets their bloody little hands on it.

    Count on it.

  31. Who didn't see that coming? by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    I mean, everybody and their mother could see his "moves" were suicidal, the only reason to not expect that he was destroying the company for MS to pick it up cheap was the sheer audacity of the fact...
    As a side note, I finally switched to a Galaxy S3 from a Nokia N9 over half a year ago, due to the fact nobody was developing for the abandoned platform. However, in every other way (except screen size I guess) the N9 and Maemo/Meego was so superior to S3/Android that for about 2 months I was constantly on the verge of getting another N9. In retrospect, my favorite feature of the N9 was how multitasking and switching between apps worked. On Android and iOS, apart from the fact that it is much slower to switch between apps, I am never certain my apps have not exited in the background and will launch from scratch and you have to jump some serious UI hoops if you actually want to force an app to restart. N9's swipe interface was the thing closer to a full desktop - fast switching between active apps (a swipe and a tap), exiting vs minimizing app having the same UI cost (single swipe from different side) and apps not dying by themselves in the background (at least in the same usage pattern that in iOS and Android kills them).

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Press and hold the main Android button to open up the list of all running programs for easy switching between them. I haven't used an N9, but the difference in speed between swipe-and-tap, and press-and-tap can't be particularly huge.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      On Android and iOS, apart from the fact that it is much slower to switch between apps, I am never certain my apps have not exited in the background and will launch from scratch and you have to jump some serious UI hoops if you actually want to force an app to restart.

      Alternative viewpoint: If apps are constantly running in the background, they are using up resources, and if you feel the need to force apps to restart, there's something wrong with them.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    3. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, everybody could see it coming, but it doesn't make sense from the POV of Microsoft shareholders.

      Nokia Mobile built its success on two things: excellent relationships with its channels, the telcos; and a superb market segmentation model. (Its designs were robust, reliable, and well-liked by their users, but conservative; and its manufacturing division ... did tolerably well, considering the tens of models and hundreds of variants. Not brilliantly, but tolerably; perhaps less so in the year before Elop was brought on board.)

      Nokia's value resided in these two things: channel relationships, and a deep understanding of all market segments: a willingness and ability to make phones for every demographic and national market, and sell them via the established channels. Those were Nokia's core competencies, the places it created value, the things it did better than its competitors. Not manufacturing. Not design innovation. Marketing, market research, selling a large range, nearly everywhere. (The one geographical market in which Nokia didn't have good telco relationships was the USA. So it didn't sell many phones, except to the discriminating.)

      That was before Elop and the "only Winpho, only North America, Apple me-too" strategy. Elop has admitted to channel resistance to selling Windows Phone, and he has pruned Nokia's tree of products down to a stump, pretty much. He's ignored (at best) nearly all markets outside North America.

      Nokia's value is gone. Sacrificed to the belief that Nokia could out-innovate companies which excel at that.

      Microsoft's buying Nokia in the hope of obtaining massively successful product innovation is ... misguided? Optimistic? An interesting idea? Unlikely to be in the shareholders' best interests? What the hell is a suitable euphemism for "deranged lunacy"?

    4. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, right: it's a Ballmerism.

    5. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by korpenkraxar · · Score: 1

      Happy N9 owner here since it launched in Sweden, although I also use a Galaxy Nexus running Paranoid Android now and then. Both OSes have their respective strengths but as for multitasking, MeeGo on the N9 wins hands down. Swiping away the app to the side moves you out of it, swiping down closes it. Side swiping while in the launcher moves you between its three modes (notifications, app icons and minimized windows). All of the movements are accompanied by (mostly) smooth animations that enhance the effect. The spatial GUI is simple, easy to learn, efficient and highly addictive. Going from the N9 back to Android is like switching from quill pen and paper to hammer and rock.

    6. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you install a custom firmware, such as CyanogenMod? I heard Samsung adds some crapware that really hogs the system.

    7. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by korpenkraxar · · Score: 1

      Yet generally, I do not seem to suffer from bad battery life or memory management issues on my N9 compared to the Android phones I have. Could it be that running closer to the silicon with C, C++ and Qt apps compared to Android's virtual machine compensates for some of that putative running-in-the-background inefficiency? The main exception though which may prove your point to some extent is going online with the chat accounts. That compared to everything else on the N9 seems to drain the battery fairly fast, presumably by keeping cellular network connections alive.

    8. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference isn't in ease of use of the interface. On Android, you get a list of least recently used apps, some of which may still be in memory. Meego had an actual task switcher with processes running in the background.

      Meego development has stopped years ago, and in some respects, like task switching and the consolidated messaging center, it is still ahead of both Android and iOS today.

    9. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      Yet generally, I do not seem to suffer from bad battery life or memory management issues on my N9 compared to the Android phones I have. Could it be that running closer to the silicon with C, C++ and Qt apps compared to Android's virtual machine compensates for some of that putative running-in-the-background inefficiency?

      Possibly. Or it may simply be the case that the apps on your Nokia phone are exiting in the background and you just aren't aware of it. I'm not familiar with the way apps running on your N9 work in this respect, but I'm an iOS developer, and I've lost count of the number of iOS users I've talked to who think that apps are running just because they appear in the app list when you double tap the home button. You can make quitting and restarting pretty seamless on iOS, the only perceptible difference from a user's perspective in most cases is a slight delay. There's no reason your Nokia couldn't be doing the same.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    10. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, don't you know your classics? Re-read the Iliad, see what the clever Odysseus did. Hint: it required a lot of carpentry.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    11. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's quite simple to verify that the apps are running in the background on the N9: open multiple apps with obvious visual changes (a clock for instance), swipe to the multitasking view and look at the live thumbnails of the running apps. That's not to say that an app cannot be pause when you swipe away of course, in many cases this is useful, for instance video players tend to pause when you switch to another app.

    12. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The N9 runs X11 with a compositing window manager. Each application has its own window. The MeeGo-Harmattan equivalent to Apple's and Android's "recent tasks" view just shows all windows in miniature (kinda like Expose' on OS X), and if any of them are doing visible stuff, you'll see them continuing to do it live -- because the actual window is being scaled and composited in, not just a recent snapshot (as on Android). It's the full, grown-up-one computer multitasking paradigm adapted to a small screen (hence only one window at a time, and that window maximized, outside of the task switcher view), rather than the featurephone paradigm enhanced with partial multitasking, as in other phone OSes. WebOS is the only one that came close.

      So I would, when cycling, leave a GPS-based speedometer/odometer app (with big numbers, to remain legible when scaled to ~25% size) and a graphical compass running in the background, and when I care about the speed, I just go to the task switcher overview, and read the speed+distance and see the compass without even having to switch to either app, then switch back to the music player.

      That's simply not possible in Apple's always-put-all-non-foreground-apps-to-sleep concept (where, AIUI, the background threads that an app can keep running in later versions of iOS don't have the ability to display anything, much less on the recent apps screen), and while technically possible, would be unreliable in Android's kill-background-apps-seemingly-at-random concept; you could replace the snapshots with live previews for still-living apps, but not only would the one (or two, in my use case) app you care about consistently get killed (because you haven't switched to it in hours, because you can see it without switching!), it would also highlight the fact that some of your apps are getting killed, when that's supposed to be a detail the user doesn't know or care about.

    13. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Press and hold the main Android button to open up the list of all running programs for easy switching between them. I haven't used an N9, but the difference in speed between swipe-and-tap, and press-and-tap can't be particularly huge.

      Yeah, but they don't do the same thing.

      For one, some of the programs in "the list of all running programs" aren't running anymore because when you run low on memory, Android runs around whacking things with an axe. (On the N9, a swap partition much larger than RAM is used, so running out of virtual memory is incredibly rare -- of course, if you do get that far, the oom-killer will step in with an axe, same as on any desktop distro.)

      For another, Android uses static screenshots of the apps, taken when you last switched away. The N9 shows you the application windows, with their contents updating in real-time, just like e.g. OS X Expose', or whatever Windows Vista calls their clone.

    14. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      You missed my point. Just because you can see that some multitasking occurs, it doesn't mean that apps can't be killed in the background and then restarted transparently to the end user.

      Look at what I was responding to:

      I am never certain my apps have not exited in the background and will launch from scratch

      Even if you can show a composited screen with some of your apps running at the same time, it doesn't mean that when you close that view, some of them aren't killed, or that others that aren't visible aren't being killed.

      This is a practice that desktop operating systems are moving towards for efficiency reasons. There are clear gains to be had here for mobile operating systems, and it's reasonable to assume that any mainstream mobile OS does this to some extent.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    15. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Not even close. The android hold button is a list of recently used apps. Are they still running? What is their current status? How much do I have to scroll to find what I want? On the N9 you had a fluid tiled list, showing the actual screenshot of the apps running in the background, with 9 apps fitting in the screen at once. On Android it is hold menu button, scroll through list, open app in unknown state. Also, maddeningly some apps don't appear in this list at all, I haven't figured out exactly when that happens. By now I have used Android for many months and it still bothers me - it is definitely not the same experience.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    16. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Well, OK. So, skype for example, for some reason in all of my platforms at some point starts dropping my calls and many times won't even connect skype to skype. Restarting the client seems to fix the problem. So indeed it looks like a problem of Skype (which, BTW, did not happen a few years ago - Skype reliability seems to be going down). On my desktop OSes or N9 I could restart it in a second. On iOS or Android I don't have such an easy option (except if you consider easy iOS's hit home, then hit home twice, then hold the skype icon, then tap the red minus on the skype icon.... ).

      But the issue is there can never be perfect apps. Even if they are near perfect, iOS at some point will start killing them if you open enough and Android is perhaps worse in that the apps are using more resources (running on a Java VM - just speculating). With N9 you have the option when switching between apps to choose which ones should persist and which should be exited.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    17. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's quite easy to tell. On the N9, you can open a terminal and use "ps" to verify that yes, they are still running. Another easy way, for apps that redraw often enough, is to look at the open apps view - you can see them redraw (in miniature).

      If an app is poorly written and is put in the background, it will definitely eat your battery on an N9 without you seeing it.

    18. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and maybe when I go to sleep the world is destroyed and then recreated again when I wake in such a manner that it could have been existing the whole time, because after all I don't observe anything happening in the world while I'm asleep.

      Instead of continuing to assert what could be happening, you could actually look up how multi-tasking works on the N9, because what you assert could be happening, doesn't.

    19. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly don't know your classics. That tale isn't in the Iliad, maybe it is time for you to re-read it.

    20. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, OK. So, skype for example, for some reason in all of my platforms at some point starts dropping my calls and many times won't even connect skype to skype.

      I'd file a bug report with the NSA for that one, it is probably their monitoring software playing up.

    21. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 1

      So who is Elop working for, if Nokia is a Trojan horse being dragged inside Microsoft's, uh, gates?

      The telcos? Oracle? Google? Amazon? Seattle Computer Products? (Revenge is a dish best served cold.)

    22. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android does this very nicely too, though not all app developers seem to know how to. I've profiled apps running pretty expensive calculations in the background, and the footprint is almost imperceptible compared to running the app in the foreground. Once you remove the extra overhead of the screen being on, it's pretty smooth sailing.

    23. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Wow.. what a mind-fuck.. I just browsed through my copy of the Iliad / Odyssey, and you're right--It's not mentioned.

      Now I feel a bit stupid...

      It's not at the beginning of the Odyssey, either.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    24. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      No, I meant the clever Odysseus / Ballmer (ok.. bit difficult analogy here) couldn't destroy the walls of Troy / non-MS mobile ecosystem at Nokia, so he sent a gift wooden horse / ex-Microsoftie Elop to open up the gates / burn the existing platform, sell the essential GSM patents, reduce the value of Nokia so the rest can be bought up and sold in pieces. Then the triumphant Greeks went back to their own army.

      I'm still a bit shocked that that story is not at the end of the Iliad (I really really thought it was), but ch. 24 ends with the mutilation, sale of the corpse to his dad, and burial of Hektor.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    25. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, it seems to be from Virgil's Aeneid, which I never read.
      fritsd.

    26. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by real-modo · · Score: 1

      I thought you might mean it that way, but I couldn't resist the opportunity for a 'gates' pun.

      I've thought of another few possible enemies for Microtroy: the Taiwanese computer manufacturers (Acer, Asus, etc.), sick of being shafted by MS; the Japanese ditto, the Korean ditto (especially Samsung), likewise; Dell, HP and Lenovo. Possibly all of them together, like the Greek cities.

      Or maybe Elop thinks himself Paris, and wants to award everybody an Apple.

    27. Re:Who didn't see that coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like you've never used MeeGo or Symbian. The apps actually ran until you clicked the exit button inside the app. When I moved from Symbian to Android (2.3 at that point) it was a frustrating experience to use the browser. Habitually I used to click on a link on my slow Edge network and move away from the browser to let it load in the background like I used to on Symbian. But the Android browser would start reloading the page from scratch every time I got back to the browser from another app.

  32. updates? by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

    Not even the slightest hope of an update for my N810, then?

  33. Elopcalypse Complete. by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given that Microsoft all but ensured that it would be an acquisition, Elop was the person who burnt the platform.

    Shame that they took over Nokia and bastardized it to be an unremarkable Windows Phone platform.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  34. Before MS commits it to the memory hole... by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    As Quoted from: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2010/sep10/09-09statement.aspx: (Archive mirror)

    Microsoft Business Division Transition
    Sept. 09, 2010
    E-mail to Microsoft full-time employees from Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer.

    Sept. 9, 2010

    I am writing to let you know that Stephen Elop has been offered and has accepted the job as CEO of Nokia and will be leaving Microsoft, effective immediately. Stephen leaves in place a strong business and technical leadership team, including Chris Capossela, Kurt DelBene, Amy Hood and Kirill Tatarinov, all of whom will report to me for the interim.

    The MBD business continues to grow and thrive, with 15 percent growth in the last quarter. It has been good to see the great response to Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010, the growth of our Dynamics business and the way we have been successful in extending all our MBD products and services to the cloud. I appreciate the way that Stephen has been a good steward of the brand and business in his time here, and look forward to continuing to work with him in his new role at Nokia.

    Please join me in wishing Stephen well.

    Steve

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  35. Least they could do after sending Elop there... by zedrdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    You break it, you buy it...

  36. Ballmer last-minute cleanup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that's Ballmer mopping up after himself before leaving I don't know what promises he made to Elop to make him drive Nokia to the ground, but given how disastrous the whole Microsoft/Nokia partnership has been I can certainly understand Elop insisting for completion before Ballmer is out.
    Ballmer's successors would certainly not have bothered.

  37. Arrr! Corporate raiding by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Send in a boarding party, drive down the price, get a lot of expensive people to walk the plank, buy the bits you want at a reduced price.
    I think it hurts enough people that there should be laws against it. What do the free market libertarians think? Should a company that relies on government protection of copyrights for it's survival be able to do such an end run around governments when it feels like it?

  38. Planned? by Racerdude · · Score: 1

    I would be very curious to know if that was already discussed/planned (by Microsoft) when they allowed Nokia to become a 'premium' partner for using their Windows Phone OS a few years back

  39. "Stephen Elop will be coming back to Microsoft" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate espionage at its finest!

  40. Gee, what a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Force/buy your shill in to the CEO position, drive down the stock price, then scoop up the company at a severe discount compared to what it would have cost a couple of years ago.

  41. Not A Suprise by broward · · Score: 1

    If you're paying attention, the consumer IT industry is consolidating along a 'vertical stack integration" strategy.

    Check out my Microsoft column for "mobile hardware". :)

    http://nodemy.jit.su/post/VerticalStack

  42. Alternate headlines? by gargleblast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any alternate headlines? Here are some:

    "Headless software company buys brainless phone company"
    "Rumours of Dinosaur extinction greatly exaggerated (And their mating habits haven't changed)"

    I'm sure there's more ...

    1. Re:Alternate headlines? by real-modo · · Score: 1

      No, Victoria, two turkeys can't make an eagle.

  43. Jolla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia should buy Jolla, and start new mobile operations from scratch or maybe BLU and create something that people would like to buy; new N9 or new Nokia Android phone

    1. Re:Jolla? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      That's right; we can't allow the Jolla-rowboat to escape Nokia's fate!

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  44. Android no more by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 0

    We can now totally forget about Nokia phones running Android or any other alternative OS - and no matter what people say or how much they dislike Windows Phone, Nokia's hardware is still excellent - it could have been a perfect match for Android, Firefox OS, Ubuntu OS, etc.

  45. Depressing inevitability by gnalre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depressing Inevitability
    This was the only likely scenario once Elop tied Nokia to the MS mast and cut away the lifeboats. It was always going to be we sail together and we sink together.
    In many ways Nokia has fulfilled their side of the bargain by generating some hardware which is as good as any phone out there. What has held them back is the OS, which despite having some good features is always lagging behind the iphone and android, and seems incapable of introducing the needed changes at the rate required in a consumer device.

    In a perfect world, Nokia would take over responsibility of the MS mobile division and it would be left alone to force the changes that the engineers of Nokia know are required. However what is more likely is that Microsoft will smother the innovative culture in Nokia to make it more like itself, so that we will get a company more concerned about how Office runs on the phone than offering the best consumer experience. I also can't wait to see how the trolls of Helsinki react to their first stack ranking session.

    What is confusing about this is the timing. Is this Ballmer's last hurrah or Elop's last desperate grab for power. If your CEO had just announced he would be leaving so would not be taking long term responsibility for such a decision, as a board wouldn't you say Whoa, maybe we will get the next guy in to look at this? Lets face it with Baller's acquisition track record it may be more profitable to take the billions of dollars, pile it the middle of Oulu and set fire to it....

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    1. Re:Depressing inevitability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is probably Ballmer better positioning his friend Elop to take over the CEO job when he steps down.

  46. Now Microsoft Stole Nokia from it's shareholders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft had tried to buy Nokia before Elop, it would have been far too expensive. Sending Elop in to ruin the business so it can be bought for a song. Typical Microsoft. If I had Nokia stock I'd be really pissed.

  47. This is CRIMINAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they installed "trojan horse" who drove still profitable company into ground and then bought for pennies what else.

    Where are Finnish authorities? Do they have criminal police in Finland? This board of directors should be raided and thrown in jail.

  48. Not a good OS? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't know if you have tried windows phone 8, but it's actually not a bad OS for a smartphone. There's a lot that can be said about marketing, consistency of APIs for developers, the app store and the apps MicroSoft includes with a purchase, but the OS itself is the least of the problem here. The real problem is the total package delivered to the consumer. The fact that there is now "one manufacturer less" that sells windows phone makes the windows phone ecosystem even smaller than it already was. Unless they will get their marketing and apps strategy together even less people will buy a windows phone than before.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Not a good OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One manufacturer less?" There will be only one manufacturer for WP very soon. This is not like the Google-Motorola deal: Microsoft just bought 90% of the total sales of their platform. They control the OS and the best selling hardware. There's no way HTC, Samsung etc could compete with them on the same OS.This is like when Nokia bought the Symbian corporation: suddenly, the same company controls the development of the OS and most of the market for that OS. Nobody wants to compete with that. Nokia became the only Symbian vendor right after that; Microsoft will become the only WP vendor very soon.

    2. Re:Not a good OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? Work force me to have a Nokia Lumia something or other with Window Phone 8 on it and it is terrible. I could list lots of examples why it is bad but here are a couple:
      1. The apps icon is an arrow point right. The arrow gives no indication that it is for apps, it is just an arrow pointing right.
      2. Go to settings. There is a list of stuff in settings. None of it is in alphabetical order. It is just a jumbled mess. As this is a list it should have some order but there is none.
      3. Answerig a call. When answering a call you are notified to 'drag down to answer' (I think it is down, could be up'). When you do this you still need to click another button to actually pick up the call.
      4. When calling someone you can easily get rid of that screen by clicking the back arrow. This keeps the call live so you then have a job to get back to the screen to disconnect it again!!
      5. I sometimes put it to sleep by pressing the off button for less than a second. Because the button is poor sometimes it seems to think I want to swithc the phone off so it asks me to drag the screen down to finish switing the phone off. I have found no way of cancelling that until it times out.
      6. Phone volume across the board. You cannot differentiate between ringtone, message tone, media volume etc.
      7. The biggest joke of all for this Nokia phone - if you let the battery discharge completely it is extremely difficult to get it to charge again because to charge it the screen needs to be activated. Since the battery is discharged the screen cannot draw power so the phone cannot be charged. A bloody pain in the arse! This of course is not the OS's fault but still ...

      I could go on. And this is not just me who has noticed these things! Most of the 30 odd users who we got this phone have all had issues.

  49. Typical criminal activity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what they teach in law school. Typical criminal takeover. What a nerve!

  50. As a 520 user.. by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    I use a Note 2, and have a Lumia 520 in the family. The thing which shone about the 520 is that, at the low price point, the touch and feel experience of the phone was simple marvellous. Nokia makes brilliant stuff. All they needed was a better OS.
    A Nokia phone with Android OS would have been the killer. Nokia still has a lot of goodwill, esp outside USA, and when you say Nokia people still Gush, and are willing to sacrifice on the OS front for the hardware. Now with M$, that is gone.
    I expect sales to go down due to two reasons
    1. Nokia is gone. The name is gone. Its M$ now
    2. The groups will be managed by Microsoft, and we all know how M$ has fared in hardware device management.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:As a 520 user.. by deroby · · Score: 1

      Going by the fact that pretty much all (non-lowest-budget) phones come with fairly similar hardware it I'd say we can safely assume that the 520's experience is BECAUSE of the OS. Put Android on it and you're likely to be disappointed. IMHO Android is going the same direction as pretty much all other software: it gets bigger, more bloated and more demanding on the hardware with each new incarnation.

      PS: Same might happen to WP off course, maybe they're just not far enough into the version-list to notice (yet).

      Me personally, I'm looking forward to what will happen in the next years... imho competition is a good thing,

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    2. Re:As a 520 user.. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      There was a long blog post by an Android developer about this problem a few years ago. In iOS, and in Windows Phone, the GUI was multi-threaded and the thread(s) related to drawing content on the screen had a higher priority than all other threads. In Android, either the GUI is not multi-threaded or it's multi-threaded by there is no priority given to screen drawing. So given a particular mobile processor running iOS, Windows Phone, or Android, the Android version will probably finish loading the data for an application first, or running the Javascript on a web page first, because it's giving all aspects of the application or web page equal processor time. But the iOS or Windows Phone version will respond to user input and actions more rapidly because it's handling GUI tasks first, and so it appears to be dramatically quicker.

      If you get the latest mobile devices, in most cases there is sufficient RAM and processing power that there is no discernable difference between the major mobile operating system. But in some cases you can still see a difference - and if you're comparing, say, an iPhone 3 against a high end Android phone launched at the same time, the iPhone seems to be three times as fast.

      Windows Phone is supposed to be an excellent operating system. I just dislike Microsoft more than I dislike Google at the moment. I really want to see Firefox OS take off, but that's a fantasy.

    3. Re:As a 520 user.. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You, and many posters here, seem confused. Windows Phone is, in almost every way, superior as an OS to Android. So you mention "better OS" then go on to mention Android? I find it bizarre.

      I like and use Android mainly because the only big, high end phones right now are Android but I'm under no illusion than Android is the better OS. All Android has going for it is the size and maturity of its Play app market.

  51. Tech giant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia was a tech giant. Not any more. Assimilated.

  52. consistently profitable? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 2

    By the time they lost the edge with symbian, they were losing money on smart phones. They tried several things before eventually ending up using only windows. The real problem was that they couldn't get back in the black fast enough and they simply didn't have the funds left to continue their own development and try to reach profit again. Maybe they were selling hand sets at a higher price than it costed to produce them, but the development costs were way higher than the profits they made on the hardware. This is why the got stuck with windows and MicroSoft saw an opportunity to trojan them.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:consistently profitable? by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      If they hadn't been so damn stupid they could have joined the Android bandwagon, it's not like Samsung, HTC, LG or any of the others that joined haven't been able to also build handsets with other OSes. Big big NIH was in play here.

    2. Re:consistently profitable? by upuv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually the Android game is very very tight on margin.

      Samsung makes money only because the basically build the entire supply chain from essentially raw materials. HTC is loosing money badly. LG I don't know. Motorola well they are now google so those books will be cooked.

      I love Android it's just a game that Nokia would never have been able to profit. I thought they should have gone with Android myself back a few years ago. But clearly that was a bad idea in hind sight.

      Nokia was caught with their pants down. The worst thing was they didn't even know it for 3 more years. By then they lost the market they owned. They simply could not grasp touch screens. The N95 was a phone that should have opened the eyes at Nokia. Here was a popular device that did pretty much every thing. It had a huge screen for the day. Did it really have a successor. Did they try to innovate after it? Nope. They just rehashed the same format a few more times.

      The next device needed to be touch. And it needed to be good. They didn't even try. They put out what was it 4 rev's of the same format? Then they basically collapsed, living off the life support of a HUGE cash balance. Which is now long gone.

      In the end the only option was sell to MS.

    3. Re:consistently profitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would NIH be a problem to them? The fact that Nokia adopted MS Phone shows that they're willing to use NIH technology.

    4. Re:consistently profitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please stop speading that lie. The numbers are out there in the nokia quarterly earning statements. The smartpone was perfectly profitable with growing sales exactly up to the point they declared Symbian dead and switchted to Windows Phone (which had declining market shared).

    5. Re:consistently profitable? by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      So you don't remember how they laughed at Android and compared it with trying to keep warm in the winter by peeing in your pants? The switch to MS was more to do with hostile takeover than not a NIH problem.

    6. Re:consistently profitable? by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      The margin does not come into play here, what I said was that they could have sold Android phones while still developing their own software (and even Windows Phones). Instead they choose to completely ignore Android, drop their own software and stall the company for several years while they switched over to Windows Phone.

      If they had sold Android phones while pursuing their other possibilities they would possibly not lost the brand/market like they now did.

  53. Rival? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Since when was Nokia ever a "major rival" to MicroSoft?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  54. Show me the money by ThatAblaze · · Score: 2

    Once you forget about what microsoft did, consider what nokia did: They received over 5 billion Euros and get to start again with a clean slate. Man what I wouldn't give to be in those shoes right now!

  55. ITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expert CEOs.

  56. Textbook case by voinageo · · Score: 1

    This is how you do a "by the book" hostile takeover. The Nokia takeover engineered by Balmer with the help of Elop will feature in management manuals. Elop proved to be a skilled "saboteur agent" who decreased Nokia shares value with 85%, to prepare it to by bought at a very low price by his master Balmer, being able in the meantime to fool and scam the Nokia shareholder and Finish state authorities for several years. One has to admire the complete lack of conscience and love of money of this guy. I think he started the big business career by selling is mother :)

    1. Re:Textbook case by voinageo · · Score: 5, Informative

      This should be a high profile case for investigation by the EU commissioner for industry. In the end Nokia was a EU company which was the victim of a hostile takeover from a US company. We should al send a formal complaint to this guy http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/tajani/contact/commissioner/index_en.htm

    2. Re:Textbook case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's assume this was all pre-planned. I just don't think Ballmer is omniscient enough to plan such a thing, honestly, but for the sake of argument I'll accept it.

      Would that be illegal or potentially questionable under either EU law or US law? Does it make a difference that they aren't buying all of Nokia (though it might be a majority of it, given that wikipedia lists their equity at about 8 billion Euros and making some reasonable assumptions about how much of a price premium MS is paying and how much money is licensing vs. actual purchase).

    3. Re:Textbook case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be more of a case for EU Commissioner for Competition who works on competition policy, mergers and cartels. Just sent an e-mail to register a complaint, I hope this gets investigated.

    4. Re:Textbook case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don;'t know how well the "hostile takeover" case will fly, but Microsoft's known involvement in PRISM and the privacy implications of this might be something for the EU to look into.

    5. Re:Textbook case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hostile takeover? Nokia was probably begging for that (from anyone).

  57. Windows Phone reaches 8% in Europe by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Windows Phones has hit 8% in Europe
    http://slashdot.org/submission/2922559/windows-8-phone-reaches-82-in-europe

    And looks like most of the people buying Windows Phones are first time smartphone users. So there is good news for Microsoft.

  58. In my dreams... by gaiageek · · Score: 1

    "...subject to approval by Nokia's shareholders, regulatory approvals and other closing conditions."

    In my dreams, the shareholders revolt, backed by Finnish regulators and the Finnish people. Elop is ousted for being the trojan horse that he is. Nokia ditches Windows Phone to make smartphones running Android (at least to return to profitability in the short-term), Ubuntu Touch and/or Firefox OS.

    I'd be very interested in a modern Nokia smartphone if it weren't running Windows Phone, and I know I'm not alone.

  59. Nokia took the lead with Symbian by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    And Symbian was developed NOT because the phone makers wanted their own OS but because they had seen what happened to PC makers when they became OEM's and didn't want to become MS slaves.

    Nokia lead the move that was "anything but MS", now it has been silenced. You can Samsung now attempting to break itself free from Android by continuing development of MeeGo.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  60. Another big loss coming for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will now be effectively the sole supplier of Windows phones. Who is going to buy their operating system from a competitor, particularly when there is no exit strategy, such as having source code rights? This formally relegates windows phone to being a single vendor platform, which I suppose it was anyway, since Microsoft installed Elop at Microsoft, to crash its share price, ready for a takeover.
    I can imagine that Nokia shareholders are not going to be happy with being robbed in this way. If I were a shareholder, I'd want this deal abandoned, and new management installed at Nokia. Nokia hardware is fine for a lower-mid range phone. It would only take maybe six to eight months to replace WP8 with Android, and make Nokia marketable once again.
    The only windows phones I have ever seen, were in the bargain bin at supermarket, heavily discounted. Few people apparently like WP8. Staff say that WP8 phones have sky high return rates, and that the devices in bargain bins, aren't even returned devices - they are factory new.

  61. Nokia Employees Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For me, the simple fact is, that yesterday, the people in the 2 big divisions, phones and networks, were both working for company that was making a loss, and had an uncertain future. Today, both are working for a company that is making a profit and has a hefty cash reserve. Well, the future is still uncertain but generally I see this as a positive move. Though maybe you can guess which of those 2 mentioned parts of the company I work for.

  62. Use the correct part of the body to think by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I don't have to get out when I have wireless access points identifying the OS for me and logging it. Maybe none of those WP8 phones are not using wifi and rendering themselves invisible to such things but I really suspect it's just due to not many of them being around.
    I'll bet Nokia had a lot more than one in twelve of the mobile market before they did a shift. Their sybian phones they still sold in China this year probably add up to more than that one in twelve worldwide.

    1. Re:Use the correct part of the body to think by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Ok, you win. You're right. Your analysis of your access point in your parents' basement is accurate, and the professionals are all just making shit up. Thanks for clearing that up for everybody.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Use the correct part of the body to think by thaylin · · Score: 1

      because the professionals dont make shit up all the time, just look at FOSSpatents blog.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    3. Re:Use the correct part of the body to think by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Nice sarcasm for a guy that had never heard of the n9 or n900. How about you write about something you know about instead of pissing all over posts by people that are watching what is going on?

    4. Re:Use the correct part of the body to think by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I try my best.

      Luckily, I don't have to intimately know the history of cell phones to be able to read and understand market research. But if you have some more anecdotal evidence about the nature of the smart phone industry based on your own personal experience, I'd love to hear it. I'm sure it would add significantly to the conversation.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Use the correct part of the body to think by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Since you've had nothing to contribute other than insults and your "big" one in twelve number I do not think you are in a position to be critical of my anecdotes which were very obviously not pretending to be anything other than what they are.

  63. News Center of Microsoft has the MS Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  64. Being "business only".... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... worked great for BlackBerry.

    What a great idea you have got there!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Being "business only".... by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      ... worked great for BlackBerry.

      Past tense. It worked so well for Blackberry that they tried to reposition themselves as a maker of social media devices. Then when that didn't bring in enough money they went looking for someone to buy them out.

      I'm not denying that they once made an awful lot of money. I'm just saying that the market place would appear to have moved on since Blackberry's heyday.

      What a great idea you have got there!

      Use it freely and with my blessing :)

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    2. Re:Being "business only".... by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I could have sworn I just heard something go "whoosh" :D

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  65. I exiled MS software from my desktops 18 years ago by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    if they think they will find a place in my mobile phone or tablet, they are loony.

    (gosh, that is how long ago I replaced Windows95 with Slackware ... and never looked back).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  66. Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Trolls by crizh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bollocks to it.

    We just can't let this happen, it's almost a full blown disaster, the one ray of sunshine is the patent deal.

    We need to find a way to buy Nokia out before this deal goes through.

    Seriously?!

    Microsoft gets a free pass for all the damage they did and gets a licence to all the Nokia patents that they know they cannot survive in mobile without?

    For the price of the Nokia-Siemens buyout?

    So Nokia shareholders are to sell their entire mobile business to the scumbags that ruined it for just enough money to own the rump end of their own business free and clear?

    Screw that.

    I'll offer the Nokia board $7.5B for 51% of the whole company, less any long term investors that want to assign their proxies to me, and I'll re-organize the whole company, turf out all the losers that have managed the company into the ground and spank the living crap out of the company that did this to them. The company that deliberately did this to them.

    If Microsoft thinks those patents are worth so much, stick 'em under a GPL-like licence that lets anybody play in mobile so long as they share and tell Microsoft and Apple to go screw themselves.

    I posted the following on Groklaw the day it died, in the desperate hope of getting some reasoned help. I was too late.

    Looks like I might be too late again.

    Stuff that for a game of soldiers, Slashdot might be full of loonies and Trolls but there are still some sane voices hidden amongst the noise.

    Have at it.

    ----------

    I've been working up to posting this for weeks.

    I don't really want to post it now but I may never get another chance.

    I'm not ready so the link will be to nowhere till at least tomorrow.

    Apologies in advance for any offence but I won't take the chance that I miss the opportunity to reach members of the Groklaw community that I may never be in contact with again.

    ------

    I'm hoping you guys will be able to help me out.

    I've been silently standing on the sidelines here almost since the very beginning. I, like you, feel very deeply that what we have been watching happen here is an outrage.

    Watching monopolies desperately trying to destroy the open-source world like a bunch of petulant toddlers makes me want to bang my fists and smash things with rage. (Yes I do see the irony there.)

    I have, for a long time, felt powerless to do anything about it but I have come to a decision to make a stand.

    The real problem is that we lack the sort of wealth and influence that the corporate elite possess. We are forced to contend with them on a battlefield of their choosing with little or no resources.

    I think it is about time we stopped putting up with that and started fighting fire with fire.

    If we want to win this war we need to acquire more money and influence than our opponents and, ludicrous as that idea seems on the surface, I don't think it's something that is beyond the realm of possibility.

    You see the thing is that the businesses that we face here are either monopolists or practising outmoded models, they are desperately trying to hang on to a way of doing business that has been out-evolved. They look on the surface like the 800lb Gorillas but in reality they are more like Giant Pandas. They are tottering on the edge of extinction because they are too myopic to realize that their ecological niche has gone or that they are in the process of destroying it with their own stupid greed.

    So here's what I plan to do and what I think I can achieve given a bit of help.

    I plan to buy Nokia.

    I think Nokia could easily be re-organized into a vastly profitable enterprise and its enormous collection of patents could be used to beat the snot out of the trolls and proprietary monopolists. I think a licensing scheme similar to the GPL could be created that forced everyone in the mobile space to 'share and share alike' and to compete on merit rather than in litigation.

    I want to create something that is inherently, by

    --
    Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
  67. And henceforth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... they shall be known as Micronia!

  68. Wisdom follows! The number of the beast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello,

    You may think the number of the beast is 666 and in fact the "death metal" music genre is quite popular in Finland and some finnish software companies appear to drop the number 666 in their code here and there.

    Yet the real number of the beast is 158. The AGM-158 JASSM is a US-made stealth cruise missile, which the finnish really wanted to buy for their F-18 Hornet jetfighter-bombers, to scare their neighbouring Russia fecesless. The finnish tried to buy the JASSM twice but were rebaffled by US Congress arms export embargo both times. When they tried for the 3rd time, USA said they are willing to sell only if Nokia is handed over, so that USA gains control over much of the world's mobile handsets. (The NSA can eavesdrop on anything, but large costs are an issue if it has to be done via tradecraft, rather than via company official built-in backdoors.)

    Now USA (more precisely their minion Microsoft Corp.) has Nokia under control and Finland shall have dozens of AGM-158 JASSM soon. The only question is, what are the export version JASSMs are worth for real? Likely they are trojaned "monkey edition" examples and cannot be targeted without US permit, so W. DC. can sell the finns to the Kremlin whenever profitable. Remember how all the US and israeli export wunder-waffe (anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles) of the georgian troops failed to fire when Russia invaded them. Tbilisi was sold out wholesale as Tel-Aviv traded secrets with Moscow, betraying their allies Georgia and Syria, respectively.

    The same fate will await Finland. They sold their economy's crown jewel for mockup cruise missiles. Now Putin is only asking for a cup of coffee. Cue Katyusha music!

  69. Wrong... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    The major experience of a touch phone is the sensitity of touch. I have handled multiple phones running same version of android, with different touch sensitivity. 520 uses the "super touch or something" which allows it to be used with gloves, hence the extra sensitive touch. This is why we did not get the 620 even though its only slightly more expensive!

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  70. Writing was on the wall years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was working at Nokia at the time the Elop Trojan was installed, and the company had the writing on the wall even then.

    The company had already spent 3 years trying to retrofit an iPhone UI into their Symbian smartphones, except using shitty hardware (resistive touchscreens etc), meanwhile trying to get Qt 5 / QML stable enough, alongside building Meego out of the ashes of Maemo and their tablet experiments from 2005, which was always a niche sideline. The company had ABSOLUTELY.NO.CLUE.

    Although they had a few promising projects, they didn't have anything that could complete with iOS / Android in a reasonable timeframe before the company was toast anyway, so the offer from MS and the cash injection seemed like the only reasonable offer for the company. Anyone that thinks that Meego would have saved the company from laying off 90% of it's staff are completely misguided.

  71. the X-Bar Re:Suddenly, the money is in hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying they should market it as the "X-Phone" ?
    How about "X-Bar" ( X-Box -> XBar )?
    Would be a huge improvement over the windows phone... but then, as you say, what wouldn't.

  72. Called it by papasui · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have gone short on Nokia then....

  73. Forgot the Chinese companies by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Only Samsung and Apple make money from phones."

    You missed the two mainland Chinese companies. Too lazy to Google for them right now but that would be two of the following: Lenovo, Huawei or ZTE. LG is probably still porfitable until they get steamrolled by yet another rising Chinese company.

  74. arggg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so much for hope of them coming back. Another good one gone and won't be back for sure now.
    MS buying anything is a death knell

  75. Novell would know something about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A tale of folly and fury told by an utter madman..

  76. The Microsoft kiss of death by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 1

    Well, Nokia certainly isn't the first "partner" company Microsoft rapes and plunders. Their usual tactic with small companies was getting a good inside look at the technology while dangling a sack of cash in front of the owners, and then steal the technology and hire all the key workers, leaving the "partner" company as a gutted empty husk.

    This time MS at least paid some token money for what they got.

    It is hard to imagine that others smartphone makers will continue to make Windows phone after this.

  77. Impact on the non-smartphone market by sp1ken · · Score: 1

    Exiting times indeed! What will this mean for the feature phone market?

  78. Nokia is dead by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will exit the phone business again in 12 months.

  79. The big money is in software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suddenly, the big money is being earned from hardware.

    That's like thinking that the big money is in steel when talking about pipelines. There is big money in the steel, but the big money is in the volatile substances going through, and in the control the ownership of the hardware gives over distribution of the software.

  80. Microsoft just lit another $7B in cash on fire by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    They're throwing good money after bad. Microsoft is like a dinosaur that used to make money crushing rocks but finds itself in a new world that requires hands and opposable thumbs.

    1. Re:Microsoft just lit another $7B in cash on fire by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Nobody at Microsoft understands the concept of "sunk costs." They are acting like the idiot lawmakers who think they should build a $3B bridge because they already spent $100M in planning and whatnot.

      "That $100M will be completely wasted unless we spend another $2.9B!!"

      But, at least they are paying for it with money stuck overseas, since they would get taxed to hell and back to repatriate it...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  81. The direction for Win8 makes more sense now. by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    I imagine that next it will become more difficult to share your data between Win8 & Android (for 'security' reasons), and enough consumers will ditch their laptop and just have a tablet and keep their data in the cloud that MS will be able to (try to) argue that their dominance with desktops and laptops is no longer important because the people stupid enough to need government protection from monopolistically engineered difficulty have moved on to tablets. Then, the small company with the patents starts lawsuits against everyone who isn't MS. So, MS ends up selling lots of phones to people who need for their phone to easily interoperate with computers at work (unless the system at work has moved to some Google designed "communicate via our cloud" service). Eventually, governments force MS to share a method for interoperating with the new security, but by then they'll have their reliable user base of people who had to learn the MS way and don't want to learn anything different.

  82. They already created stores similar to Apple store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the first 'mPhone' will be like. If it' anything like the Lumia 920/928/1020 it should be GREAT. I've owned the 920 and now 928 and I love them both.

  83. They make cars? KIA? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Ive seen the KIA cars.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  84. Attachmate vs. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is... Elop doesn't have anyone to sell Microsoft to...

    Attachmate is where old software goes to die.

    You make it sound like Attachmate is evil and that is not fair.

    Attachmate is like a retirement home, where the elderly go to live out their remaining days.

    Microsoft is more like a serial killer, euthanizing the elderly.

    1. Re:Attachmate vs. Microsoft by symbolset · · Score: 1

      How does this contradict what I said?

      BTW: I think that by various indirect means Bill Gates controls Attachmate utterly. And I'm OK with that for now.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  85. Re:I exiled MS software from my desktops 18 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cool story bro.

  86. from usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you wish hire a ceo, or any kind of employee from usa?

  87. Dell is next by DublTall · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft is serious about the "devices and services" company shift that Ballmer has been touting (and it would seem so by this Nokia acquisition) then I believe the next move will be to acquire a PC business. And Dell is the perfect candidate. Their growth and all of their profits come from their services business, their PC and laptop business loses money, and they are about to be saddled with a lot of debt from their management buyout by Michael Dell and friends. This would give Microsoft the final piece of the puzzle to be in every business Apple and Google are in.

  88. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by higuita · · Score: 1

    read closely:
    EUR 1.65 billion to license Nokia's patents,
    MS will license Nokia patent, it will not acquire then

    --
    Higuita
  89. Beware of Microsofties trolling slashdot .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh bullshit. First of all when it comes to MSFT pretty much ALL of their successes in the past can be preceded by "and then the other guy did something REALLY dumb" thus giving MSFT a free shot, from BE-OS"

    I stopped reading when I got to this particular bit of retrospective rewriting of history.

    Microsoft's anti-competitive activities in the Operating System Market

    1. Re:Beware of Microsofties trolling slashdot .. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Name ONE, just one, place where that doesn't fit. BeOS? Tied first to AT&T Hobbit CPU, then to PPC, by the time they figured out X86 was the way to go it was too late. OS/2? IBM tried to assrape the "gang of nine" with MCA bus so that by the time OS/2 came out it was treated like plague blankets by the OEMs and to top it off they demanded $200! per license from the OEMs when MSFT was selling their for $15, the rest is history. Netscape? NS4. WordPerfect? Refused to move to Windows, instead put out a REALLY shitty DOS port that crashed more than it ran, didn't bother putting out a true Windows port until 99, too late. Apple? Firing Jobs are replacing him with one shit CEO after another left them with an OS that was a decade out of date, overpried underpowered hardware, and to top off the fail they had a pile of products with different names but similar features at wildly different price points so nobody knew what was good and what wasn't.

      You can do that with the entire history of MSFT, from Bill Gates lucking into getting the contract for a CP/M clone for IBM on up, they had a competitor royally fuck up and took advantage. the "brilliance" of MSFT was spotting those flubs and capitalizing on them but now MSFT is too big and unweilding to do a quick switch like that which is why they are dying in mobile, even if Google and Apple make a mistake by the time MSFT recognizes it and moves its too late.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  90. Usually I invoke Hanlon's Razor ... but ... by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    In most cases like this I turn to St. Hanlon, who wisely advises: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." But in this case, I think Grey's Corollary kicks in: "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."

    Of course, it can be debated if the Nokia epic crash-and-burn is adequately explained by stupidity. Just ask Tomi Ahonen.

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  91. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Do you have 7.5 Billion? Or is that a proposal for other people to risk their money on your idea?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  92. Resistance is futile .. by codeusirae · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a classical Microsoft move, a Microsoftie join a company ruins it and then rejoins the mothership, resistance *is* futile ..

    BBC failed Digital Project Cancelled

    Project Kangaroo Cancelled

    Highfield joins Microsoft after just four months at Project Kangaroo

    BBC appoints Microsoft man to control future media

  93. Question for thought... by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    Considering what Motorola has done for Google, I wonder if the Nokia acquisition will turn out any different for Microsoft.

  94. Barnes and Noble next? by technomom · · Score: 2

    The game now isn't the devices, it's the cloud. Google v. iCloud v. Microsoft Outlook+XBox+whatever else. These days, the device is just your entry point into your cloud of choice. One of the missing pieces I see is book content. Microsoft already made an investment in Barnes and Noble. Today, Amazon announced the MatchBook program which provides either a free or $1 e-book for certain Amazon physical book purchases made as far back as 1995.

    This has to sting an already reeling Barnes & Noble. I'm wondering if Microsoft is going to white knight them as well and add another piece to their cloud puzzle?

  95. Good news to Nokia by higuita · · Score: 1

    Not only they manage to leave Elop behind, but scrap the mobile business that he destroyed.
    If Elop manage to get to the CEO of MS, we will all win, as clearly he will slowly destroy MS from inside.

    i just feel sad for all those nokia workers...

    Nokia still have the patents and can now freely build a phone with android or meego (now Tizen) (probably can't call it nokia phone, call it smart-nokia)... what a killer move!!

    --
    Higuita
  96. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by Raenex · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of crap. Modded up because you played the karma whore card, "Time to kiss my karma goodbye".

  97. Shareholder lawsuit? by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The CEO has a fiduciary duty to his company and its shareholders. Elop pretty obviously violated that duty by acting in the best interests of MS, not Nokia. It seems to me that there would be strong grounds for a Nokia shareholder lawsuit against Elop personally, and possibly against MS as well. Discovery proceedings could be quite interesting – civil attorneys can demand just about any relevant documents, emails, and so forth. Unless everything was done verbally with no record, there ought to be some evidence of Elop's malfeasance.

  98. so Windows won't run on HP, Acer, Lenovo Chrome bo by raymorris · · Score: 1

    So your issue with Google is that Windows can't run on small devices built by HP, Acer, Lenovo, etc. but Linux can?

    If you want an old fashioned Intel laptop, with it's 2 hours of battery life and 10 pound heft, there are plenty available.

  99. Things that make you go Hmmmm.... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Or reading what you posted in a slightly different perspective makes MS look like an Evil Genius, and Elop a Mastermind.

    Step 1) Infiltrate Nokia
    Step 2) Destroy Nokia stock prices from the inside.
    Step 3) Buy out Nokia at a fraction of what it would have cost.
    Step 4) Return to MS a hero, become CEO.
    Step 5) PROFIT!!!

    Step 6) The World?

    Muhahaha!

    1. Re:Things that make you go Hmmmm.... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Seriously, he destroyed their in house OS in favor of Windows... Nokia is the primary producer of Windows phones. Is anyone surprised by this? It all looks rather sketchy and unethical however. Nokia workers being laid off by the tens of thousands must be thrilled. Wonder what they think of the news...

    2. Re:Things that make you go Hmmmm.... by tp_xyzzy · · Score: 1

      > Nokia workers being laid off by the tens of thousands must
      > be thrilled. Wonder what they think of the news...

      Guess it's some big evil masterplan. The question to ask -- what is the evil plan that takes billions and billions of money, enough for a big company like nokia to run out of money enough that they must sell some assets. The decrease in sold mobile phones is not explaining it, since if they're not using their time to create phones, _what_ exactly are they creating? I think we're going to see some big surprices in the future. Noone just knows yet what they are. Maybe they're expanding their market area reach to cover US market and building ecosystem. But what it will contain is anyone's guess. Nokia and Microsoft today are just placing their first moves in a bigger game; and something big is coming. We just don't yet know what it is.

    3. Re: Things that make you go Hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing big is coming. eFlop and his merry men assraped Nokia.

      The leftover Nokia will make just network gear until they merge with someone, probably Ericsson or Huawei.

      Microsoft will keep on spiraling downwards with their Zunes squirting.

      That's all there is to it. Why the billions? Spying people through a device which they carry with them all the time. Having eyes an ears on these, you can let your debt explode and your cartoon currency do whatever the fuck you want, and still win business battles and dominate others.

  100. A 3rd Eco system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually bought a lumina 720, just to try after my htc 1x and iPhones. And to be honest, I am very impressed with the quality if the phone, as well as the refreshingly new ui. Further, a 3rd Eco system is something that would be lovely, with one closed system and another track-everything-a-user does system.

    1. Re:A 3rd Eco system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah...more competition...better for end consumer

  101. Finally free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Finland and I hate how this company is supposed to be a "national heroic achievement". Finally we get rid of this bunch and there will be some space to breath.

  102. Actually ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft bought Nokia for its galoshes. The bullshit is going to flow deep and fast in Redmond as Ballmer's successor is selected.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  103. This was almost a good thing by Minwee · · Score: 1

    I thought that at least Windows Phones might finally get a decent maps application, but it seems that MS didn't buy that.

    Then again, that could mean that Nokia/Ovi/Here/There/Whatever maps could find their way onto other devices instead.

  104. Stephen Elop will do it by leehanxue · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer is simply incompetent. 13 long years and Microsoft is alive and kicking. Worry not, dear shareholders. Stephen Elop has a proven track record in Nokia.

  105. Would YOU hire an ex-Microsoftie? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Elop was just doing his Microsoft job by working against the interests of Nokia's stockholders for Microsoft's financial gain. It might be a criminal job, but a job is a job, and I'm not sure that in Nokia's case, the crime was even illegal. Don't hate the enemy soldier for being an enemy soldier.

    Nokia's board was presumably legitimately stupid for hiring him. Don't hate your generals for being stupid; hate yourself for fighting under their banner.

    No, I'm talking to the next company: Board, explain why your hiring of the Microsoft guy shouldn't result in an immediate investigation. Because you'd have to be either just shocking stupid, or willfully negligent, to embrace a Microsoft agent. The ignorance excuse just can't possibly fly at this point, can it?

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  106. Nokia analysts reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomi has been following the decline of Nokia on his blog for years now. Here is his reaction to yesterday's new:

    http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2013/09/another-death-in-smartphone-bloodbath-windows-phone-strategy-so-failed-now-nokia-handset-unit-sold-t.html

  107. Arg!!! therr goes hope for Windows Phone! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Unless MS plans on learning that it's about the OS and most importantly the store, this is a mess about to happen. The goal is not to sell a new phone to every user every year, it's about selling one phone to each user and making sure the store rocks.

    If MS lets Elop keep his disgusting "users want 20 phones we'll ignore after we sell them" tactic, it'll fail horribly. MS really needs their own phone... Not phones. Do it once and do it right.

    And QUIT letting Nokia do the design!!! Nokia's industrial design sucks. Microsoft proved they do it right with Surface Pro which was an awesome design. I love that Surface Pro 2 didn't come out when Haswell did. I will buy it when it does.

    Now, fix Windows Phone. The keyboard sucks. The task switching sucks. Exchange support sucks. The store is loaded with crap... Be selective. Less is more. Make a silent mode button on the phone. Ditch the back and search buttons... Make it part of the apps. Get a good browser. IE is sad. Time to go webkit. Get app session management working. Help Amazon get their apps for the phone right. Let the play/pause button on the headset actually continue play on third party players. Add a codec API to the player so we don't need to recode videos.

    If MS builds a phone I hope it uses Intel.

  108. employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At closing, approximately 32,000 people are expected to transfer to Microsoft"

    This is great news. For years business experts have been saying that one of the main reasons Microsoft has been doing poorly is it doesn't have enough employees.

  109. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Your rant is too long for me to fully read, but if I understand correctly GRR MICROSOFT!? Is that about the gist of it?

  110. nokia wasn't 'dead' by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I read a thinly-veiled defense of M$ in your tl;dr post...let's address this:

    Second of all Nokia WAS ALREADY TOAST by the time the board called in Elop

    they weren't doing *well* but that doesn't mean they were going to crash and burn...it's practically Finland's official technology provider...in business for almost 150 years...lots of deep business relationships in Europe

    only a dumb, short-sighted (typical) American businessman would look at Nokia and think "ah they're toast"...

    Nokia could have switched to Android instead of Widoze.

    Sure, they'd have taken a loss to switch to Android, but it was a loss no matter which OS they migrated to!!! Nokia's userbase would have weathered the change as they have for decades of new tech.

    M$ jobbed Nokia and the entire country of Finland. The end.

    It's kind of like hearing a neighbor couple argue...you can't help but listen but you don't approve of it in any way...that's how I view M$'s raping and pillaging of Nokia. I don't agree with it, I think it is wrong, but AFAIK it wasn't *technically* illegal...so lesson learned I guess?

    That's it...that's the lesson: STAY AWAY FROM MICROSOFT or anyone who does business in their manner.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:nokia wasn't 'dead' by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I agree about Nokia/Android. The "Samsung owns Android" meme is bullshit. The smartphone-buying public is fickle, and so far nobody's given them a great reason to jump ship from Samsung. The HTC One could've done it - maybe will still, but Samsung has so far kept the hype (and new models) coming to the point that everyone else is drowned out. Let's see how the Moto X does.

      In any case, Noka's Lumia devices had some really nice industrial design going for them. And these days, they're trying to differentiate themselves based on high-end camera tech. Who's to say those two factors alone wouldn't have made them a standout in the Android crowd? They'd have gotten to market a lot sooner, that's for sure.

      Elop's research of Nokia's options reminds me of Dick Cheney's search for a vice presidential running mate for G.W.B. (or the run-up to the Iraq war, for that mattrer). A phony process to justify an already foregone result. Whether the MS purchase was part of that forgone result, we'll never know. But it's at least a 50-50 chance that it was in there from the start as Plan B.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    2. Re:nokia wasn't 'dead' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ jobbed Nokia and the entire country of Finland. The end.

      It's kind of like hearing a neighbor couple argue...you can't help but listen but you don't approve of it in any way...that's how I view M$'s raping and pillaging of Nokia. I don't agree with it, I think it is wrong, but AFAIK it wasn't *technically* illegal...so lesson learned I guess?

      Nokia had no plan and no future and they knew it! Thats the whole reason they appointed Elop and the whole reason they went along with his plan. If Nokia were confident in their business they wouldnt have hired him in the first place and they certainly wouldnt have changed their entire business based on what he said. Why are all these Nokia apologists treating them as though they are some innocent victim?

      If these retarded conspiracy theories are to be believed then why doesnt microsoft just put one of their execs in the job of CEO of google and do the same thing there? Oh right google isnt a failing business run by a bunch of retards that would just accept that.

    3. Re:nokia wasn't 'dead' by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      How EXACTLY is it bullshit friend? Samsung has the bigger profits which they have wisely used in R&D and advertising to pretty much own the market. Does that mean nobody else can make any money with Android? Of course not as HTC and LG show but what that DOES mean is that you are fighting for the scraps, no different than how Nokia had 80% of the dumbphone market yet wasn't making jack shit compared to the high end niche that Apple had carved out.

      But if Nokia would have went for Android they would have died that much quicker as they didn't have the experience, nor the advertising, nor the word of mouth. LG has the low end market pretty much locked up with their Optimus line, HTC has the midrange market, and Samsung has the high end market and like Apple has built up serious brand recognition with the consumers....what did Nokia have to bring to the table?

      When you are faced with a competitor that is firing on all cylinders and is at the top of their game you just can't go in half ass dude, you better bring your A game and have a product light years ahead of the other guy and what did Nokia have? Old designs, weak chips, if they wouldn't have taken that billion bucks from MSFT and instead released what they had (which nearly all their hardware at the time was based on the ancient TI OMAP, long in the tooth even then and pathetic when compared to the best HTC and Samsung offered) combined with the high cost to manufacture for Nokia would have been suicide, nobody was gonna pay Nokia premium prices for an out of date Android unit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  111. Steve Jobs take two... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Remember when Jobs was forced out from Apple and he founded NeXT? NeXT was later acquired by Apple for it's OS, which later became OSX as we know it. Elop is now back at Microsoft in a key position (mobile). My bet is that he becomes the next CEO.

  112. Wrong by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    When someone decides to buy a smartphone they think - which one has got the best features vs price, best screen, best deal from the phone company, looks the best, has the best app store.

    What they DON'T think is "Hmm, what gives me best access to cloud service XYZ?".

    1. Re:Wrong by technomom · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. We don't think about the cloud by name, but I can guarantee you that people who have their life in either Apple, Microsoft or Google's cloud service definitely give thought to which phone will be easier to use given that their stuff is there. I know I certainly did, as did other members of my family. In fact, it was a deciding factor in most cases, particularly among people who are buying 2nd and 3rd smartphones.

  113. good luck w/ that OS by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    seriously, I genuinely wish them well, but I don't see Jolla competing in Nokia's territory.

    here's an interview with one of their founders: http://www.ossimantylahti.com/2012/07/interview-of-jussi-hurmola-jolla-mobiles-managing-director/

    From that interview:

    Jolla aims to create something fresh compared to iOS and Android.

    Waste of time. Android is there. I know Meego exists and theoretically someone here on /. will make a case that it's better but that's in theory land. In the business world, Android is the only viable competitor to iOS.

    It'll do more than waste time...it will drain R&D and kill the project.

    Jolla, and any other company wanting to do "mobile" should make apps, work on *one* device that fills a gap in the market perfectly and sustainably, and go from there.

    making your own OS isn't some kind of badge or right of passage for a 'mobile' company...its just about what is best for your users at that time!

    My idea for a device is an iPhone 5 clone that can run iOS or Android, run on any carrier, has a USB and removable memory, and can receive over-the-air radio and TV!

    IMHO the 'smartphone' market is about fully 'plateaued' now...it's like the TV market...it's so advanced the product differentiation is small...perfect time for a startup to enter!

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  114. obvious now by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    With Juniper and Microsoft he was prospecting for clients, and found gold with Microsoft.

    it's so obvious now, looking at GP's info on Elop's resume...

    so it's all just a bunch of insider trading...

    I see alot of commenters gaming out who did what and when and why Nokia failed and Microsoft wasn't 'evil' but made a mistake and on and on...

    This is not about sharp, highly technical yet well rounded businesspeople on a board of a company or in a product development team trying to make the best widget for their users...

    This is about rich people gaming a system of commerce for their own personal short term gain...it's not 'business' it's Machiavellian bullshit.

    Sure, b/c this predatory capitalism makes profits and therefore makes headlines many equate their profit with success...but it is not so...

    It's robbery...legal? most likely yes...but in the end it is a failing way to do business and proceed through life

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  115. So much for other Windows Phone vendors by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    This sends a strong message to any handset vendor: don't support Windows Phone, because if you do you'll be competing directly with Microsoft.

    When Google bought Motorola, they were quick to reassure vendors that it would be run as a completely separate business, and wouldn't have any special access or privileges. But I doubt Microsoft will do the same. And if they don't, then any other vendor of phones running Windows will be at a serious disadvantage.

    Microsoft is trying to copy Apple, not Google. They want to control the whole stack, hardware and software together. Which is ironic, since they built their success with the same model Google is using now, creating the software that runs on any vendor's hardware.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  116. Classic Quisling - Belluzzo Tactic by deppman · · Score: 2

    Who didn't see this coming? Remember Rick Belluzzo? He destroyed SGI by decimating its products, migrating huge chunks of IP to Microsoft (remember "FireGL?" It's now called "DirectX"), and sewing FUD in his own SGI customer base. Job well done, he took his golden parachute and softly landed back at MSN.

    Elop is Belluzzo reincarnate. He didn't care if he destroyed the lives of thousands to improve his career. If he gets the MS CEO position after wiping out 90% of Nokia's market value because of his sophomoric blunders, it will confirm how dysfunctional corporate governance has truly become.

  117. Logo? by multi+io · · Score: 1

    Where did the good old Borg drone logo go that decorated MS stories on Slashdot in earlier years? Never would that one have been more fitting than here...

  118. Not a good phone by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I have a Lumia 520, and I do have a few issues. Other than that, the phone is fine.

    1. 1. The phone sometimes goes into vibrate mode w/o any reason. I've activated ringtones, but not always does it instantly work. Also, while talking on the speakerphone, the max volume is 10, not 30, which defeats the purpose of using a speakerphone
    2. 2. For any call, the same area that's used to receive a call is re-used to disconnect a call, once the call has been picked up. Also, it's right next to the Speakerphone area. Sometimes, after receiving a call, I want to put it on speaker, and end up accidentally disconnecting. Can't they make it a separate button somewhere else that one would only get to by trying?
    3. 3. The search button on the bottom right of the phone is easy to accidentally touch, and it throws one into the Bing screen, regardless of what one is doing. There seems to be no way of disabling that. And it's one of the least used features of the phone, at least for me.
    4. 4. I agree w/ point 7 above - if the battery discharges completely, it takes a while before one can even begin to recharge it.
    5. 5. I downloaded an app that allows me to watch cartoons - particularly the Scooby Doo cartoons. Problem there is that the app data only goes to the phone memory, and there is no way to ask it to store that on an SD card. Result is that the phone memory gets filled pretty quickly, and then there is no way to do anything. Ultimately, I had to uninstall that app, and it was my favorite app on this phone.

    I do have some good things to say about this phone as well. Namely, if you are not buying a phone to play games or watch videos, it's a great buy (Don't bother if you want great games, though - a lot of my favorite games are not on this as yet)

    1. 1. Typing is just sublime on this phone. When you type, it throws up some suggested words in a row either above or below the text space. It's totally up to you to use them or not just by tapping on them. Not just that, it even throws up good suggestions - I find myself using one of the suggested words a lot of the time. That makes this phone productive for anything I need to do that involves typing. Previously, I didn't SMS much, since typing on numeric keypads was a pain, and I hate SMS language. Now, I SMS frequently, but using complete sentences.
    2. 2. The main reason I bought this phone - GPS - has been more than satisfied. I use HERE maps from Nokia, and they're just fantastic - both driving directions as well as locations. Apple could learn a few things from Nokia in this regard - or maybe rent that service from the remnants of Nokia
    3. 3. I don't know about how app rich a phone has to be, but I downloaded a few apps that turn out to be pretty handy - an units converter, a time zone calculator, a calculator, a finance manager, currency converter and the Weather channel. Also, I once opened OneNote, which I don't use on laptops, and saw a shopping list, and now, whenever I go shopping, I can check out the items on OneNote.
    4. 4. The photos - as Windows Phone commercials show, the Smart Shoot app is fantastic - only issue that if you like more than one of the selected photos, you can't select that - you can save only one. Haven't tried taking videos
    5. 5. Skydrive - being able to save your stuff in the cloud. Granted that everyone has it.

    Having said all that, I think that only the 520 is worth its price. The others are overkill for plain jobs, and underkill for things like video & gaming.

  119. Anti Competitive Anti Trust Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this deal fall under Anti Competitive Anti Trust Laws

  120. failing company != hire M$ raiders by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Nokia had no plan and no future and they knew it

    so what?

    true or false, that statement disproves *nothing* I've said...

    there's no law saying that every failing company in Finland must hire ignorant Machiavellian former Microsofties who will slash and burn a century old company...you're way off!

    so...no shit Sherlock, when a company is failing (as Nokia was pre-Elop) you can *always* say of that company, "X has no plan...X has no future"

    if it was otherwise, the **company wouldn't be failing**

    a flagging company is an everyday occurance in the business world...companies go through cycles...but they maintain a minimum of existence and weather storms!

    just because a company is 'failing' does not mean they need to hire an unethical *corporate raider* who will suck your company dry then sell it out to a bigger company he used to work for...

    then he goes to work for that company

    no way man

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  121. Re:I exiled MS software from my desktops 18 years by quenda · · Score: 1
  122. So... by Jiro · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that Xbox live wiull now carry emulated N-Gage games?

  123. Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blind leading the blind.

  124. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Nokia shareholders are to sell their entire mobile business to the scumbags that ruined it for just enough money to own the rump end of their own business free and clear?

    Oh for fuck sake only a complete imbecile would point the blame for Nokia's failures at anybody but Nokia's own board and management. You think anybody can just walk in, take over the CEO role and do whatever they want? No this all had the approval of Nokia's board and management, they are the scumbags that ruined it.

    I'll offer the Nokia board $7.5B for 51% of the whole company

    No you wont.

    turf out all the losers that have managed the company into the ground and spank the living crap out of the company that did this to them.

    To who? Nokia did this to themselves.

    Watching monopolies desperately trying to destroy the open-source world like a bunch of petulant toddlers makes me want to bang my fists and smash things with rage.

    What monopolies? The only one I can think of is Microsoft's desktop monopoly, which has no relevance whatsoever here so unless you are referring to some other monopoly that is just a play for sympathy based on ignorance.

    and its enormous collection of patents could be used to beat the snot out of the trolls and proprietary monopolists.

    What trolls and monopolists? None of the players in the smartphone market are either of those things.

    I think a licensing scheme similar to the GPL could be created that forced everyone in the mobile space to 'share and share alike' and to compete on merit rather than in litigation.

    How about you actually create something of value rather than trying to take what they have created under the current model? Perhaps demonstrate that your model is indeed better and can actually produce something before you try to take the fruits of the model you oppose and apply them to the model you like. There is a lot of talk that the 'share and share alike' ideology is better but little in the way of proof that it can produce much of anything much less actually be better.

  125. Re: Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thoughtful!

  126. This is Classic M$ behavior by metaforest · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember what M$ did to Danger Inc, and the Sidekick? They basically shot it in the head:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danger_(company)

    While I never owned a Sidekick everyone I knew who had one loved it.

    What is left of Nokia might be the big winner here. I can't see this going anywhere but badly for M$.

  127. This is like watching 24 all over again... by slash.jit · · Score: 1

    Apple releases iPhone
    Google releases Android,
    Samsung, LG etc releases android phones
    Apple sues Samsung, HTC
    Nokia Sues Apple
    Apple Sues back
    Samsung sues back
    Microsoft releases WP
    Microsoft sues Android manufacturers
    Android manufacturers sues Microsoft back
    Google buys Motorola
    Oracle sues Google, but FAILS
    Apple, Microsoft sues Motorola
    Motorola sues back
    Microsoft buys Nokia
    Microsoft sues Apple, Samsung, HTC
    Apple, Samsung, HTC sues Microsoft back

    Watch for latest updates - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone_wars [wikipedia.org]

  128. Whos's next by slash.jit · · Score: 1

    Motorola was going down.. Google brought it..
    Nokia is going down.. MS brought it..

    Now who's ready to buy Sony Mobile?

  129. so sell your Nokia stock kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have any left, sell that Nokia stock, and invest in Google. In 6 months, you can cash out with a fortune, or let it ride for 5 years. Nokia used to be a good company. Hardware is still ok. Software is utter crap. There is dying due to market pressure, and then there is 'stick phone 7 into it; this pig is done'.

  130. Microsoft buys Valve - News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    might be able to get thir app store to fail at beign a steaming pile of shit by reaplacing it with steam.

    buy gog.com while they're at it.

    windows 9 might actually play dos games out of the box.

  131. You like many other.... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    posters here, are a fanboi. And I am not going to give you any counter argument, because any counter argument to fanboi's is useless.
    As for me, I believe the best OS is the one which makes you productive. If there was one best OS, we would all use that one best OS. So different folks, different strokes, but fanbois do not understand such simple logic.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  132. if i were not laughing right now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would be crying.

  133. Re:Time to kiss my karma goodbye, bring on the Tro by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The question is WHY Nokia did this to themselves. It is reported Nokia's chairman got a call from American investors to the point of "Appoint Elop CEO or you will be replaced and he will be CEO anyway". Who are these investors, what is their plan? Nobody knows. They got what they wanted though, much to the loss of other investors and of course, Finland. If I was a Finn politician responsible for such I would be launching a full-scale investigation with all the resources and power of a nation state to find out what happened here.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  134. Re:I exiled MS software from my desktops 18 years by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    From one of the search results:

    "Microsoft's contribution in the grand scale of Linux is tiny, with Red Hat, Intel, Novell and IBM accounting for almost 25 per cent of all changes. "

    In any case, if they release the code under the GPL I have no beef with that, I see it as a very small capitulation from their part.

    The day they open the whole thing I'll forgive them. Maybe.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.