Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is iOS 7 Slow?

New submitter PopHollywood writes "Is iOS 7 slower than version 6? After upgrading, myself and a few others notice slow, choppy experience when scrolling, changing apps, etc. Is this common?" For those using iOS in general, what's been your experience with the new upgrade?

289 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Dude, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you're scrolling it wrong.

    1. Re:Dude, by no1nose · · Score: 1

      I have a 3 year old iPhone 4 and feel like I have a new phone again. It even feels fast too. I will get an iPhone 5s once LifeProof makes a case for it. /love the bubbles and shiny

    2. Re:Dude, by Chrontius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My (i)phone (4) hung in the middle of the upgrade, so I ended up having to do a clean install.

      It took all night, but it feels less laggy than iOS 6 was at the end. Also, some have complained about the useless animations, but if my actions are acknowledged immediately, I don't end up assuming the phone ignored my input, trying again, and taking eleven pictures of the floor in front of me while trying to start the camera.

      Protip: Consider doing a clean install.

    3. Re:Dude, by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I don't have a lifeproof case, but they look like they cover the bezel. Might make swiping difficult.

    4. Re:Dude, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "No personal offense, but I really hate people like you" has to be the most hilariously passive-aggressively dickish thing I've heard all week. Kudos.

    5. Re:Dude, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . Change for the sake of change is a bad thing.

      Like how you are wearing clothes with styles from the 1700s? Oh.. right.

      We change clothing styles to keep getting laid. Granted, some people's interaction with a UI is the only way that happens, but still, not for most of us.

    6. Re:Dude, by quacking+duck · · Score: 5, Informative

      My (i)phone (4) hung in the middle of the upgrade, so I ended up having to do a clean install.

      It took all night, but it feels less laggy than iOS 6 was at the end. Also, some have complained about the useless animations, but if my actions are acknowledged immediately, I don't end up assuming the phone ignored my input, trying again, and taking eleven pictures of the floor in front of me while trying to start the camera.

      Protip: Consider doing a clean install.

      That's the thing, I installed iOS7 on my test/backup iPhone 4S, so I could explore it before installing on my iPhone 5. The overall UI remained smooth as I used the browser, various apps, etc for a couple hours... no appreciable stuttering or lag, which was impressive.

      However, the feel of the UI itself is definitely slower. The lockscreen fade-in and fade out, while nicer than the instant on/off in earlier iOS, takes too long. The animation that happens after exiting the lockscreen to Homescreen, which while running prevents me tapping on an app to launch it, is over 1 second, whereas my iPhone 5 on iOS6 is half that.

      Also, after pressing the home button in iOS6 it's about 1/4 second before an app exits, which still allows time for starting double- or even triple-press functions. In iOS7 this delay is a full second! This is the epitome of actions NOT being acknowledged immediately, and there's no obvious good reason why this additional delay was put in.

      It's not just because it's installed on an older device or because it wasn't a clean install, I verified iOS7's longer, built-in UI response times on an iPhone 5S in the store.

      I can get used to the visual changes, I really don't appreciate the additional lag times that seem to be built-in to the OS itself, since the whole idea was to simplify and improve the interface!

    7. Re:Dude, by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I like them.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    8. Re:Dude, by dwightk · · Score: 1

      try switching to decaf

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    9. Re:Dude, by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I don't drink coffee, nor energy drinks, and tea only rarely, but thanks for playing.

  2. Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in a field where I see a lot of mobile devices and we've been seeing a lot of issues with iPhone 4/4S/5 units that had iOS 6 and were upgraded to iOS 7. Haven't come across too many 5C/S units yet but the few we have seem to be doing okay (no real issues with the 5S, 5C seems a little stuttery at times but not bad).

    1. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      In my case i had a whole slew of issues that showed up with IOS6. MMS stopped working, iMessage over data didn't work, data dropped constantly and I had to toggle roaming to regain it - just lots of stuff. None of this occurred with my iPad 2 just my 4S. I had been told that a "hard reset" would fix it and indeed the Apple store did it - which pretty much wiped out EVERYTHING on the phone but it worked great except I'd pretty much burned down my house to get there. So I pulled a backup and restored it - problems came back too. I had pretty much resolved myself to swapping hardware anyway and figured that would be a good time to burn the house.

      IOS7 came out and I figured what the heck, I wasn't going to JB this unit anyway so I upgraded - just like I'd done through all of the 6.x point releases. ALL of the issues I've been able to test so far are gone! I was shocked to say the least. Now I had heard that some others were having the same issues but hadn't ever spoken to anyone face to face about it. I'd guess that apple heard about it enough to track them down and solve them - this is awesome! I still haven't tested visual VM but I suspect that's my carrier screwing up.

      I'm pretty happy with the performance on my 4S. I've heard others complain however and also claim that it charges slower or doesn't hold a charge as long for them - I'm not experiencing this. I'm half tempted to stick with the 4S except I want the faster CPU and larger screen size. Maybe I'll be able to do some side by side comparisons once the hardware show up but for now the 4S is holding me fine :-)

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    2. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A 'hard reset' is just a cold boot- it forces all apps and the OS to shut down immediately, and reboots the device. You do it by holding the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons down.

      You seem to be referring to a Restore- that resets the device to factory settings, wiping all content. That's done through iTunes.

      And if the problems came back when your backup was restored, then obviously there was something wrong with what was restored.

    3. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by deviated_prevert · · Score: 5, Funny

      A 'hard reset' is just a cold boot- it forces all apps and the OS to shut down immediately, and reboots the device. You do it by holding the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons down.

      You seem to be referring to a Restore- that resets the device to factory settings, wiping all content. That's done through iTunes.

      And if the problems came back when your backup was restored, then obviously there was something wrong with what was restored.

      Or if you are really adventurous just stick a paper clip into your lightning connector and wiggle it around.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    4. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by kmg90 · · Score: 2

      No, they are not identical or are you saying Apple's own website has bad information? https://www.apple.com/iphone/compare/

    5. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by phayes · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know you were shooting for funny but all you achieved is looking dumb. Lightning uses active negotiation at voltages designed to be non damaging even if shorted out, not hardwired pins like the electric sockets your mom keeps telling you to stop sticking paper clips into...

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    6. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by fonos · · Score: 2

      That link compares 5S, 5C, and 4S. Where are you seeing a 5 and 5C comparison? AC was correct when (s)he said "The 5C has innards identical to the 5."

    7. Re:Been seeing lots of issues on upgraded phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good lord you sound like a barrel of laughs...

  3. wouldn't be the first time.... by Luthair · · Score: 2, Informative

    That Apple has pushed out updates to hardware that couldn't really handle it. They've done this both to computers and I phones.

    1. Re:wouldn't be the first time.... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Another way is blocking the version for models that you think *should* be able to handle it. Whether that is a "better" way I can't tell.

      It's very convenient that whatever choice Apple makes they get to be flamed for artificially forcing new hardware purchases.

    2. Re:wouldn't be the first time.... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      That Apple has pushed out updates to hardware that couldn't really handle it. They've done this both to computers and I phones.

      Actually I've always been impressed how the osx updates worked so well on my old hardware. I some cases there wasn't much change, and in some cases there were definit improvements. I can't think of any upgrade where I felt bogged down afterward.

      I agree about the phones, but remember that the phones are improving like at 2x annually. Hard to make an os. That takes advantage of new phone hardware but runs well on a phone that is 3 years older and 10x slower!

    3. Re: wouldn't be the first time.... by drcheap · · Score: 1

      2^3 = 10 ?? Must be that "new math" they are teaching these days, or some very large value for 2.

  4. Slower on my iPhone 4... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...especially after a reboot. Seems to get better as my commonly used apps are stored in RAM, but still choppy in areas such as switching apps through the multitask menu and occasionally when starting to type, which is far more annoying. Absolutely fine on my iPad 3 though.

    There's room for improvement, but I'm not exactly displeased.

  5. Yep by AdamHaun · · Score: 5, Informative

    There seem to be two different kinds of slowdown. The first is due to the new animations for things like going back to the home screen. The second is more intermittent, and happens mostly when task switching. Both of them are annoying. The whole reason I went with iOS over Android was the snappier UI.

    The disappearing Safari toolbar also drives me crazy. I wish I had held off on upgrading. Hopefully Apple will have some tweaks and patches out soon.

    --
    Visit the
    1. Re:Yep by sheddd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yea I've had iOS7 on a couple devices since WWDC; it wasn't painful on an iPhone 4S IMO... and it's no longer painful on a mini IMO... battery life was terrible; battery's better now that they've removed a lot of debugging stuff but still significantly worse than 6 on older devices.... I got a new iPhone, and the battery's better with iOS7 than my 4S was with iOS6... maybe some of the battery saving measures they took only work on the new chip.

    2. Re:Yep by FuzzNugget · · Score: 5, Informative

      The whole reason I went with iOS over Android was the snappier UI.

      This may have been true a few years ago with Android handsets generally being underpowered, but the hardware caught up a while ago already.

      I have a Nexus 4 and, aside from the rare hangup which happens on any OS, everything is just instant. Transitions are smooth and clean, apps load effortlessly, scrolling is incredibly responsive.

      My dad's iPhone feels sluggish and cumbersome by comparison.

    3. Re:Yep by giorgist · · Score: 2

      Ultimately trying to hack in multitasking is a very difficult thing to do. Android has done it properly from scratch simply riding on the shoulders of linux. Apple wanted to make sure the experience is guaranteed so it slowly introduced task switching, and now it has to hack it in. Price to pay It is funny, bit Linux and IOS are at at the 3.11 stage in different ways.

    4. Re:Yep by immaterial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Android has done it properly from scratch simply riding on the shoulders of linux. Apple wanted to make sure the experience is guaranteed so it slowly introduced task switching, and now it has to hack it in.

      What exactly does this mean? What is Android getting from its Linux pedigree that iOS doesn't get from its BSD UNIX pedigree?

    5. Re:Yep by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      The part that really bugs me is how they implemented the "scroll up = reappear" part. If I drag the page up, stop, then lift up my finger, nothing happens. I have to fling the page so that it keeps moving on its own momentum to get the toolbar to reappear. How do you screw that up? Was anyone really upset about not having those pixels to begin with?

      --
      Visit the
    6. Re:Yep by AdamHaun · · Score: 2

      Didn't realize I could do that. Googling, it looks like I'm too late -- Apple has stopped signing the old firmware versions. :-(

      --
      Visit the
    7. Re:Yep by immaterial · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why scrolling up makes the toolbar reappear at all. That should just be disabled. To get the toolbar to reappear just tap the shrunk-down header (really, that should be obvious) or the footer (that should also be disabled, because it gets in the way of clicking links in that part of the screen).

      But really, just use one of the nicer 3rd-party browsers. I'm partial to Atomic Web but there are a lot of other popular ones available.

      to the grandparent, the animation isn't distracting at all, because it animates the shrink to coincide perfectly with the movement of the page when you scroll down. If it just popped out of existence it would be far more distracting.

    8. Re:Yep by TyFoN · · Score: 4, Informative

      The N4 (which has been out for about a year) does not have this issue at all. In fact, I've not seen it on any android phone that came out the last year.
      The last time I experienced a small UI lag on times was with the 3 year old HTC Desire. It kind of helped that 4.0+ went with HW accelerated UI.

    9. Re:Yep by dorre · · Score: 2

      Mine iphone 4 is way faster. Draining the battery. Two mornings I have woken to realize it shut down during the night. Probably was around 30-50 % charged in the evening. Crazy fast I tell you.

    10. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      You realise that iOS is the darwin kernel, which has full pre-emptive multitasking, right?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      Multi-tasking IS hard to do well on a mobile device without chewing the shit out of your battery life.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:Yep by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Android 4 improved things a lot over previous versions. I installed Cyanogen on an old Galaxy S (single core 1GHz CPU, 512MB RAM) and it's very smooth and responsive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Yep by Solandri · · Score: 1

      This may have been true a few years ago with Android handsets generally being underpowered, but the hardware caught up a while ago already.

      I'm pretty sure the lag when task switching is due to insufficient RAM, not being underpowered. I'm still on a 3 year old Galaxy S (single core, 512 MB). If I use the carrier-provided Android 2.3 it's pretty snappy and only lags if I force it to task switch while it's busy processing something else.

      But I've loaded Jelly Bean on it to get some of the newer Android features. With a clean install it's still snappy. But it starts to lag after I've loaded just a few apps. In order to keep it responsive, I've actually had to ditch most of the 200+ apps I originally had in 2.3. When I check system memory, about 450 MB is in use after it boots. A good chunk of that is "default" Google stuff that I need, like the Play store, gmail, account manager. I'm saving a good chunk by refusing to install Hangouts (I uninstalled Google+, but for some reason Hangouts keeps wanting to install).

      (And before you ask why I don't upgrade, I'm still trying to find a decent water resistant phone which works with polarized glasses. The S4 Active seems to work, but alas it's an AT&T exclusive.)

    14. Re:Yep by someones · · Score: 1

      Still the userland did not support it officially for a long time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitasking_(iOS)

    15. Re:Yep by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      iOS didn't come with full multi-tasking of apps, and Android did.

      On an Android phone, my third party nav software (Waze) can keep talking to me as it runs as a service in the background while my engine monitor software (Torque) also runs in the background as a service while my third party music app (Meridian) plays music without a problem. If I bring up the web, none of those things stops working unless the phone actually runs out of memory (and then it kills something in the background).

      On an iOS device in general, if you switch from one app to another, the first app is now dead.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    16. Re:Yep by redcommiebastard · · Score: 1

      This may have been true a few years ago with Android handsets generally being underpowered, but the hardware caught up a while ago already.

      I'm pretty sure the lag when task switching is due to insufficient RAM, not being underpowered. I'm still on a 3 year old Galaxy S (single core, 512 MB). If I use the carrier-provided Android 2.3 it's pretty snappy and only lags if I force it to task switch while it's busy processing something else. But I've loaded Jelly Bean on it to get some of the newer Android features. With a clean install it's still snappy. But it starts to lag after I've loaded just a few apps. In order to keep it responsive, I've actually had to ditch most of the 200+ apps I originally had in 2.3. When I check system memory, about 450 MB is in use after it boots. A good chunk of that is "default" Google stuff that I need, like the Play store, gmail, account manager. I'm saving a good chunk by refusing to install Hangouts (I uninstalled Google+, but for some reason Hangouts keeps wanting to install). (And before you ask why I don't upgrade, I'm still trying to find a decent water resistant phone which works with polarized glasses. The S4 Active seems to work, but alas it's an AT&T exclusive.)

      Check out the Sony Xperia Z ( http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/phones/xperia-z/ ) Its quite durable and water resistant. I'm getting it for my fiance. We have a toddler that sometimes hides her phone. Eventually he'll get it wet. The specs are great and the reviews are decent.

    17. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.macrumors.com/2013/09/21/iphone-5-touch-screen-twice-as-fast-as-android-touch-screen/

    18. Re:Yep by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Background apps are suspended, thus using no battery life.

      How is THAT multi-tasking? That's just saving a program state somewhere and pulling it back up on demand. Multi-tasking is when you are actually RUNNING a program in the background, although with fewer percentage of CPU cycles.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    19. Re:Yep by jon3k · · Score: 1

      None. We have a pretty large Verizon Wireless account (many many many hundreds of devices) so I get access to every new device that comes out, our account rep will send me anything I want. So I try out basically every new device that comes out and can use anything I choose. I'm not bragging I'm just illustrating a point, which is, after using every device out there worth trying, I'm carrying around an iPhone 5. The consistency of performance just outweighs anything else that Android brings to the table. The flagship phones (eg S4) still have stuttering and performance issues. I can't even imagine what a 5s will be like. My employee that manages our wireless devices asked me if I wanted a new 5s and I told him no. For what I do, the iPhone 5 is so fast it's honestly not worth it for me to take the time and hassle to switch to another device.

    20. Re:Yep by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Ars Technica made a video comparing animated transitions in iOS 6 and iOS 7 side by side. The animations in iOS 7 do take longer than those in iOS 6, making the user experience more sluggish.

      Direct link to video.
      Link to article with the video in it

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    21. Re:Yep by AdamHaun · · Score: 2

      They show a difference of ~30-50ms between iOS and Android. Based on previous discussion about input lag in LCD monitors, that seems to be a range that some people find very annoying and others don't notice at all.

      --
      Visit the
    22. Re:Yep by Cow007 · · Score: 1

      Camera much more responsive on my iPhone 4; no picture scaling and iris animation makes less delay between taking pictures and ability to take picture quickly after camera is started. I like it.

      --
      411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    23. Re:Yep by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about stuff like how much lag there is between me swiping my finger and the app list scrolling to the next page

      Actually I think there's a design decision here. The scrolling motion (up and down and paging side to side) takes a little more finger movement before the screen responds on Android. This means that it's generally easier to hit a button (because buttons activate even with a little side finger movement) but feels less responsive to scroll. I'm an Android user, and I find it quite hard to hit iPhone screen buttons, but the scrolling does feel much more responsive.

    24. Re:Yep by berj · · Score: 1

      This isn't even a little bit correct.

      I was just in the car listening to a radio app and receiving turn by turn directions from a navigation app. I pulled over to eat and read some emails and surfed the web for a bit. I sent some messages and IM'd with a few people. All the while the radio kept playing. If I was receiving updates from some external accessory that would have kept updating in the background too. all while the map gave me directions and the music played.

    25. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      So.... basically like iOS does it then?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    26. Re:Yep by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. The experience of sluggishness is mostly to do with how long it takes to react to a UI input. If the animation starts immediately, it may not appear sluggish, even if it takes longer.

      If the animation is long enough to slow down the next input, then that too might give the impression of sluggishness. But that is not a given, just because the animations are longer than on iOS6.

      One of the significant improvements in the iOS7 is a consistent feeling of place, coming largely from a more consistent zoom-in and zoom-out animations, rather than the more arbitrary animations of iOS7. And given animations have certain speeds that they look best at.

      It's a trade off. And one that seems better overall than on iOS6.

    27. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar boat - I get to evaluate/use any handset i want and decide what we're likely to purchase. I'm still carrying an iphone. Which is why i had the HTC One for an eval. Didn't find anything i need/want that iOS doesn't do and it didn't actually perform any better in day to day use than my 4s. I'll probably step to a 5s sooner or later, but I seriously see no pressing need to ditch the 4s yet.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    28. Re:Yep by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Really, so my example is now possible on iOS? yes or no.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    29. Re:Yep by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I specified third party apps on purpose. Just FYI, there is a difference between background notifications and actual background app running.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    30. Re:Yep by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      For those replying, I quote: "The other side of multitasking is the way apps run in the background. Apple added a strictly prescribed form of app multitasking a few years ago, but it is expanding in iOS 7. Apps will be able to update in the background based on intelligent scheduling at the OS level. If you always use certain apps at certain times, iOS 7 could allow them to be ready in the background. That sounds great, if it works.

      Android has always taken a laissez faire approach to multitasking. You want to run that app in the background? Cool, it’s done. Hit the home button? No problem, the app is still there. This has led to some battery life concerns in the past, but more recent versions of Android have improved matters. You definitely have more power with the Android system, but there is potential for apps to abuse this system."

      http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/166828-ios-7-vs-android-4-3-apple-takes-giant-leaps-while-android-stagnates

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    31. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      This was a design decision on the UI, not a core problem with the OS. Apple held off until they could tweak it for better battery consumption.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    32. Re:Yep by berj · · Score: 1

      With the exception of mail I *was* using third party apps (google maps, iCab mobile and corus radio in this particular instance)

      None of the tasks I was doing had anything to do with "background notifications". Radio and nav were running properly in the background.

    33. Re:Yep by Xest · · Score: 1

      Same is true even with my old Galaxy Nexus, and the Nexus 7 and these are both now what, 18 months to 2 years old?

      Honestly, since Android 4 the "Android feels slow/laggy meme" is dead unless you're buying a budget phone, but it seems silly to compare say a £150 Android device to a £500 iPhone and then complain that the Android does seem as good. Of course it wont be as good, it's less than 1/3rd the price.

      Spend about £200 though and you'll get something that feels as good as any version of iOS. It still wont have the same degree of power for things like gaming, if that's what you're after then you will have to spend more, but if you don't play high end mobile games much on your phone but want a smooth interface for what you do do, £200 for an Android 4.x phone is plenty.

    34. Re:Yep by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      So, what is the "correct" hardware that provides this magical superior performance?

      Pretty much everything but the one you bought. Always.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    35. Re:Yep by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      After a jb on iOS6, I installed an app that allowed for speeding up of animations. Made it feel like a new phone and the native iOS speed felt incredibly slow. They do need to speed up animations in iOS.

    36. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      So you mean to get a decent android experience, i need to buy a device that would feel dodgy and cheap even if marketed as a children's toy?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    37. Re:Yep by smash · · Score: 1

      btw. have used the galaxy S3 and S4. in terms of build quality and feel to actually use, they are junk.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  6. Not new by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've kept an iPod touch 2G and 4G around for a while—and I can say with some confidence that every single release of iOS has come with a palpable performance penalty. That's how Apple decides when to stop releasing iOS for a given device; the performance gets unacceptably awful.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    1. Re:Not new by antdude · · Score: 1

      That's normal. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not always.

      iOS 5 was extremely slow for my iPhone 3GS (made me regret updating from 4) BUT iOS 6 actually speeded it up again.

      I think Apple's update policy relates also to how long ago it was on the market - the original 3G was unbearably slow for the last update offered with it, but they still put it out there because it had been available as the "low cost" option not too long ago.

    3. Re:Not new by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Huh. Interesting. I've been keeping my iPT 4G on iOS 5 because I assumed 6 would be dog-slow like all the others; maybe I should upgrade it.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    4. Re:Not new by Quila · · Score: 1

      For computers, the CPU/GPU performance has pretty much been plateaued for years for basic operating system function. Any moderate x64 chip from 2010 and a decent GPU can run the latest OS X, Windows or Linux with no noticeable performance hit.

      This is not so with phones. iOS 7 is still pushing the 5S hardware to be able to perform. As noticed by the 5 and 5C not performing as well, that extra power is needed. Just look at the performance progressions of the A series (I'll use the claims, actual depends on individual benchmark):

      A4 to A5 - 2x CPU, 7x GPU
      A5 to A6 - 2x CPU, 2x GPU
      A6 to A7 - 2x CPU, 2x GPU

      In going from essentially a tweaked Samsung Hummingbird to a bespoke ARMV8, and from a single Power VR SGX535 to a 4xG6430, they have a difference of 8x CPU and 28x GPU.

      For mobiles were are obviously where desktops were years ago, struggling to keep up with the CPU and GPU needs of the latest OS. It will plateau soon, and older phones will be able to run the latest OS better.

      That said, a 4S runs iOS7 reasonably well. That's two years support for the latest OS, and will at least run until three years. That's standard for Apple, and better than you normally get from Android. We have three Androids and an iPhone purchased around the same time. Each Android got a dot version update and was then abandoned. Two of the Androids even had promises of Android 4 from the manufacturer, not delivered. The iPhone 4S came with iOS 5, then got feature updates with 5.1, 6, 6.1 and 7. An Android user complaining about Apple updates is definitely pot/kettle.

  7. Almost seems purposeful by incom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the iphone 3g, apple has been pushing updates that slow down older phones.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    1. Re:Almost seems purposeful by organgtool · · Score: 1

      I experienced that firsthand. Luckily I waited until I went to trade in the phone before loading iOS 4 on my iPhone 3G because it turned out to be unusably slow. All of the articles I read stated that iOS 4 ran great on an iPhone 3G, but I couldn't even scroll through the home screens without severe lag, even with a clean install of iOS with no apps.

      However, foregoing the update had negative side effects of its own. I was unable to install many apps because they required the new version of iOS and older versions of those apps were unavailable on the App Store. There's nothing like needing to update iOS to get a new app, update iTunes to update iOS, possibly update Mac OS to get the latest iTunes, and eventually upgrade hardware to get support for the latest version of Mac OS. I'm not sure if all of that is still required, but it certainly didn't seem to live up to Apple's standards for being user-friendly.

    2. Re:Almost seems purposeful by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      I was unable to install many apps because they required the new version of iOS and older versions of those apps were unavailable on the App Store.

      They fixed that the other day too; now the App Store will warn you if the current version won't run on older iOS, and will offer you the last version that will run on your system .

      Of course, now people are bitching about that...

      But at least it fixes some of the more stupid fuckups - for example, iOS happily updating core apps like iBooks on old hardware to incompatible versions for the last year or so...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:Almost seems purposeful by immaterial · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure if all of that is still required, but it certainly didn't seem to live up to Apple's standards for being user-friendly.

      Fortunately not; you no longer need iTunes for updates and you are able to download older versions of apps that are still compatible with your older OS. And luckily none of the updates has been as terrible on older phones as iOS 4 was on the 3G, even though they do all (unsurprisingly) tend to tax the hardware more.

    4. Re:Almost seems purposeful by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      even though they do all (unsurprisingly) tend to tax the hardware more.

      That should surprise you. Android has been getting faster with every release, as has Windows, as has Linux. If iOS is getting slower then Apple are doing it wrong.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Almost seems purposeful by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's the modules which the NSA crams in that is making the whole thing slow.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    6. Re:Almost seems purposeful by longk · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct. It's true for most software though. Rarely have I updated a piece of software and found it to be faster than the previous version.

    7. Re:Almost seems purposeful by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      I would suggest that 99.9% of the population who use smart phones would endorse new features at the cost of performance. I'll assume you're the 0.1% in this instance.

      I don't know if I agree with your proportions.. I've seen so many iPhones that have effectively been upgraded into uselessness, where their owners crave a new phone so that it will work again...

    8. Re:Almost seems purposeful by martin_dk · · Score: 1

      Upgrading the 3G to iOS 4 rendered my phone incredibly slow. It was a shame because I was actually happy with my phone, and I felt that Apple this way forced me to buy a newer model. I just can't stand the feeling of knowing some hardware is capable of performing great but crippled by intension, careless coders or a careless company. I consequently explored the new Android models and found a model I really like.

  8. Apple OS Upgrade Expectations (OSX & iOS) by ryanw · · Score: 2

    When upgrading my mac computers I have always seen a significant boost in performance on the same hardware (obviously).

    When upgrading the iOS devices I have found the opposite to be true. Each new version, on existing hardware, is slower but the feature set expands incredibly.

    I think this is because iOS started out as an infant and did what it was supposed to do really well and performed really well on the hardware it was designed on, and had features that only worked on the existing hardware. But as iOS has matured, so has the feature set.... There are incredible search engines, graphics engines, Siri, and tons more... this has required increasing hardware capabilities to keep up with the features. .... So the trick with iOS is don't expect to get performance gains with iOS updates unless you update your hardware at the same time. Each new iOS version brings new bells and whistles, but not performance. With each iOS capable hardware device you should expect significant performance boosts.

    1. Re:Apple OS Upgrade Expectations (OSX & iOS) by mendax · · Score: 1

      When upgrading my mac computers I have always seen a significant boost in performance on the same hardware (obviously).

      That has not always been my experience. I upgraded my maxed out 5 year old iMac from Snow Leopard directly to Mountain Lion and it's noticeably more sluggish. But going from Leopard to Snow Leopard was a big improvement, probably because of the 64-bit kernel. It seems that unless the OS takes advantage of some hitherto unused hardware capability it's slower.

      So, my conclusion is this: Upgrade == New heights in the development and marketing of Bloatware.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    2. Re:Apple OS Upgrade Expectations (OSX & iOS) by mendax · · Score: 1

      I did a great job of writing this article. The first line is a the quote, the rest is my alleged contribution to this discussion. And I properly looked at the preview this time.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    3. Re:Apple OS Upgrade Expectations (OSX & iOS) by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

      I hate to be Captain Obvious here, but isn't it true in general that the more advanced the operating system, the better (newer) the hardware it needs to run well? Nobody who values their time or sanity tries to run Windows 7 on a Pentium Pro computer.

      So yeah, older iPhones will run the new iOS more slowly than they ran the older iOS.

      --
      "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    4. Re: Apple OS Upgrade Expectations (OSX & iOS) by TyFoN · · Score: 1

      I have linux om an old dual ppro 200 MHz. Works like a charm :)

  9. Control Center by dinsdale3 · · Score: 2

    I haven't noticed any general slowness on an iPhone 5.

    However, there does seem to be an issue with the new Control Center. I have noticed sluggish responsiveness from buttons on the bottom of the screen in certain apps, presumably due to a conflict with the Control Center which can be activated by an upwards swipe from the bottom of the screen. Turning off the Control Center within apps (Settings/Control Center/Access within apps) fixed this issue for me while still retaining functionality from the main and lock screens.

    1. Re:Control Center by mikeroySoft · · Score: 1

      I've been noticing that too... in Google Hangouts, for example, the 'send' button has to be accurately pushed and held for longer than other buttons to register properly.

  10. Actually faster... by TechDock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe I'm the only one, but my iPhone 4S is actually working faster now. Transitions in and out of apps is much quicker, without the delay I had before.

    --
    Dreamers, shapers, singers, makers... Elric, the Techno-Mage
    1. Re:Actually faster... by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      Same here with my 4S, seems faster and more responsive. Maybe it's just due to my expectations but it certainly isn't slower.

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    2. Re:Actually faster... by Jim_Austin · · Score: 1

      Me too, same thing. Improved performance. Same phone: 4S. Maybe it's a 4S thing. Hey, did you notice improved call quality? Whose your carrier? Jim

      --
      Editor, Science Careers
  11. Not so much slowness by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've not noticed excessive stutter on my 4s, but battery life seems to be worse thus far. I've not had iOS 7 installed long enough to be sure, but it looks like even with my typical workday activity the battery is draining noticably faster. Getting two days out of a charge doesn't look possible anymore.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Not so much slowness by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      You can help speed it up some by disabling the parallax effect and by limiting what Spotlight Search has to index. My battery is slightly worse as well, I think. Turning off location services and background updating (among others) can help older hardware run smoother and longer. /4s owner

    2. Re:Not so much slowness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've not noticed excessive stutter on my 4s, but battery life seems to be worse thus far. I've not had iOS 7 installed long enough to be sure, but it looks like even with my typical workday activity the battery is draining noticably faster. Getting two days out of a charge doesn't look possible anymore.

      I absolutely agree, my battery life is not what it was and getting two days will be much harder.

      Also since upgrading to IOS 7, my iPhone4 is much slower than before, even when opening messaging, and Facebook has crashed twice.

      I'm waiting for my 4 to start messing up than I'll get a 5S.

  12. Depends on your hardware of course! by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt iOS7 is slow on iPhone 5s/5c. Now on iPhone 4, you should only be upgrading if you really need new features or must have consistency with your other devices, not with expectations of great performance. I the later case, you should probably have stuck with iOS5.

    It's perfectly fine for me on iPhone 5 or iPad 2.

    1. Re:Depends on your hardware of course! by memeplex · · Score: 1

      Phhht. Stuck with iOS 5? Based on what? iOS 6 ran great on the iPhone 4 and iOS 7 runs great on it, too. The fanciest visual effects that would've over-taxed the hardware are turned off automatically. For me, and for others I've spoken with, it's running flawlessly.

    2. Re:Depends on your hardware of course! by mikeroySoft · · Score: 1

      It is as slick as can be on the 5S. Everything is smooth. Battery lasted all day with constant LTE use. I've been using Google Maps navigating around all day.
      There's some software glitchy-ness going on here and there (going back to the 'home' screen 'jitters' at the end of the animation as it resets the image for the parallax effect), but I expect that to be resolved in updates. Some inconsistencies with the keyboards too, but devs will have to update their apps to use the new 'flat' style.

      What I would like, however, is to be able to swipe up and instead of pulling up Control Center, I want the multi-tasker. Ideally, let me pick what each directional swipe can do... Maybe I want to double-tap home for Notifications, pull down for Control Center, and swipe up for multi-tasking... 4-finger swipe up on an iPad is okay but I find my fingers 'skipping' on the way up a bunch if my hands are too dry or something, causing the gesture to not be recognized.

    3. Re:Depends on your hardware of course! by bkmoore · · Score: 2

      iOS 6 was an optimization of iOS 5 and runs much better on my old 3GS than 5 ever did. I cannot imagine anyone seriously recommending iOS 5 for these older devices.

    4. Re:Depends on your hardware of course! by raarts · · Score: 1

      iOS7 runs fine on my iPhone 4. It even feels a little bit faster.

    5. Re:Depends on your hardware of course! by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems to depend on your software a lot more than hardware. iPhone 4 users (like me) seem to get a speed-up if they regularly manually close background apps and tweak the settings to block uncessary GPS use, and a slow down if they don't.

      My phone *seems* snappier at some things, but probably isn't. For example the unlock screen is noticeably more responsive, but that's probably because of the much bigger swipeable area, and the 'swipe a notification to launch the relevant app feature. The only noticeable slow down is the zoom animation when launching of leaving an app, but that's more thanoffset by the things that take a lot less taps than before, like turning off wifi.

      The best feature for me is one that hardly gets mentioned in reviews; the ability to block contacts. No more 7:30 am text messages from the dumbass phone company telling me my bill is ready to view, and that idiot who can rarely dial his daughter's number correctly will finally be silenced. Considering the phone company wanted me to pay them half my line rental again to do this, getting it for free is a great deal.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  13. Yes, but only on older devices by PHPNerd · · Score: 1

    I had an iPhone 4S and I upgraded to iOS7. I noticed the slower animations and choppier UI right away. It was one of the things that made me very happy that I was ready for an upgrade. My new iPhone 5S performs perfectly, with the smooth UI and animations that I have come to expect from Apple. It seems like the older hardware just can't support it.

  14. Re:yawn by immaterial · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wouldn't say there's much more eye candy, but a lot of what there is you can at least turn off ("reduce motion" and "increase contrast" in the settings should turn off the parallax effects and translucent blurs, respectively).

    That said, I notice no slowdowns on my iPhone 5 or 3rd gen iPad. Everything runs quite smoothly (though unsurprisingly it didn't during the betas).

  15. Nope by ericdano · · Score: 1

    I was using the Betas of iOS since b3, and have the current version on my iPhone 5. It's as fast if not faster. And the battery life has been a LOT better.

    I also installed iOS on an iPhone 4 for someone, and they noticed right away that it seemed a whole lot snappier.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Nope by immaterial · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Restricting folders to a 3x3 grid is by far my biggest pet peeve. It's an absurdity on a 10" tablet especially. If you have a dev account I encourage you to file a UI big against it. Maybe if they get enough complaints they'll do something about it (hahahahaha).

    2. Re:Nope by Optali · · Score: 1

      Sadly. iOS7 runs smoothly, and is quite good... but my wife just bought an Asus Memopad... quad core.. do I have to say more? Well, there are SD card slots, mini USB, animated backgdounds, a 5MP rear camera :_(

      I went to the Android marketplace and saw dozens of free developement apps while I'm stuck with a few half cooked ones and have to pay for them

      I have seen my colleague from work with his Samsung open an app on top of another :_( and this was an older model

      But yes, you are right... they are so amazing... we have to have faith, faith and hope are the last things one can afford to loose

      Bwaaaaahaaaaaa :_(

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  16. Re:iPhone 4 Issue by ericdano · · Score: 1, Informative

    And you're proof of this is what?

    I installed iOS 7 on a iPhone 4 about a week ago (the GM version) and the user of the phone has noticed nothing bad, and in fact says it seems faster than iOS 6 was. PLUS they love a lot of the new features of it.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  17. Re:yawn by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what I can see there is a *lot* more eye candy (and I'm not talking about the icon changes) - it seems like the decided they needed to animate every single action and control in the OS now. Not to mention transparency, animated blur effects (especially in the camera), etc.

    I don't notice any slowdown from it, though - seems like they are using the 3D HW to do it, and the latest devices have pretty decent graphics. In fact, the perception is often that it's faster (which is the point of transition animation) but that's just a subjective observation...

  18. choppy slashdot by Arakageeta · · Score: 1

    The choppiest site I've visited on my 4S with iOS7 is slashdot's mobile site. The background of each story is "active" in the sense that when I thumb-down to scroll, the story's background dims to grey. The regular white background returns when I lift my thumb. This, combining this action with scrolling really makes for a choppy experience!

    1. Re: choppy slashdot by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Safari is slow and freezes up from time to time. I cleared the browser cache and cookies along with rebooting the phone. I'm going to guess there's a bug that will get stamped out on the next round of iOS 7 updates.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  19. iPhone 5 by alienzed · · Score: 1

    seems just as smooth as iOS 6 on an iPhone 5 and 4S to me...

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  20. Re:Yes by hedwards · · Score: 2

    That's a false equivalency. Apple controls the whole process, they design the hardware and set the specifications, they write the software for iOS and they decide which devices will receive upgrades. Plus, Apple doesn't typically release dozens of different models at any given time.

    Whereas neither Android nor Windows mobile is so vertically integrated.

  21. Of course it's slower on older hardware by Golden_Rider · · Score: 4, Informative

    iOS7 should be fine on an iphone 5 or 4s, but there definitely should be a noticeable slowdown on an iphone 4. That hardware is a bit old by now, and iOS7 is designed for the newer hardware. E.g. the iphone 4 still has a single core A4 CPU, while the 4s already has the dual core A5. The newer phones (5 and up) also have twice the RAM. Still, upgrading to iOS7 is a user option, and it's better to have that option than not to have it. Not many 3 year old Android phones still get OS upgrades.

    1. Re:Of course it's slower on older hardware by raarts · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 4 feels a little bit snappier on iOS7. No slowdown even though the hardware is older.

    2. Re:Of course it's slower on older hardware by Smerta · · Score: 5, Informative

      FWIW, and I know this is anecdotal, but I upgraded my iPhone4 to iOS7 and found the moderate slowdown to be acceptable. Personally, I really enjoy & appreciate many of the changes.

      One thing in particular that I appreciate, now when I take a photo, the screen isn't unresponsive for a couple seconds after taking the photo. Said another way, the camera feels much "snappier" (no pun intended), even for taking single photos. I found this surprising and a bit odd, since some other things are actually a tad less responsive after the udpate.

      I'm not a moth that's drawn to bright lights, but iOS7 looked interesting enough that I figured it was worth a try. (That, and the fact that I'll replace my 3-year-old phone soon enough anyway, be it an iPhone or something else.)

      Mind you, I've been around the block, and I was burned badly when I upgraded my iPhone 3G to iOS4 a few years back. Talk about an update bringing the phone to its knees! There were times when I'd press a button (usually while typing on the keyboard) and the phone wouldn't respond for 20 seconds. Talk about fucking the dog, that release had no business running on the 3G. Sure, it might have been a ploy to force people to upgrade their phones, but it really soured me.

      Anyway, caveat emptor and all that, but if you've got an iPhone4, and you are on the fence about upgrading to iOS7, I would recommend you go for it. Just understand that certain things might not be quite as fast (power up being one of the most obvious, I haven't timed it but it's noticeably slower).

    3. Re:Of course it's slower on older hardware by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      there definitely should be a noticeable slowdown on an iphone 4. That hardware is a bit old by now

      Not really. Android 4.2 runs really well on a Galaxy S, released at the same time as the iPhone 4 and with somewhat similar specs. Faster than the original Android 2.2 it shipped with. Running 4.2 it does pretty much everything an iPhone 4 running iOS7 does and more besides.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re: Of course it's slower on older hardware by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      That's easy you just hit the little "optimize" tick box on the compiler doo-dad in the IDE, right?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Of course it's slower on older hardware by jimbo · · Score: 1

      Well, silly mine-is-better-than-yours wars aside in these threads - Android really badly needed project Butter. Everybody from fandroids to Google admitted this and I think the project managed to achieve it's goal quite well.

  22. apps start a little slower, otherwise ok by Camembert · · Score: 1

    My experience on an ipad 2 so far: popular apps like Safari start somewhat slower, say from a bit under a second to a bit over a second. Afterwards it seems ok. Some transitions could be smoother but they'd not be quicker in my perception. It is quite logical that there is some loss of speed on older hardware. In general it is still very usable and the clean, crisp UI works well after dubious first few minutes.

  23. Seems fine to me by kirkc99 · · Score: 1

    I've been using it on my 5 for over a week now (I installed the GM shortly after it was released). Since I installed it pre-release, I did a restore instead of an upgrade. I've had snappy performance and great battery life. I suggest backing up and doing a restore.

  24. Re:yawn by calzones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All these new animations drive me batty.

    Sure, you see something happen right away in response to an action, so in a sense, you have instant feedback. If that makes you think things are happening faster, lucky you.

    Because my iPhone 5, when it was running iOS 6 felt faster to me because any action I took translated to a change of UX paradigm right away where I could take yet another action. Hence, I'm working faster. Now with animations, I have to wait for each animation before I can take my next action. That feels slower to me.

    Worst offender is the new lock screen. Why did they decide to make me wait an extra 1/2-1 seconds after hitting the power or home button to turn it on so that can "gracefully" fade in from black before giving me access to the "slide to unlock"? It's maddening.

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
  25. Re:yawn by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

    I dunno. Can't get faster than instant. Which is why I'm glad I can turn off so much of the useless animations in Android.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  26. Haven't really noticed a slowdown by mkraft · · Score: 3, Informative

    I haven't really noticed a slowdown on either my iPhone 4S or iPad 2. It gets a little choppy occasionally on my iPad 2, but that happened with iOS 6 at times as well. The biggest issue I've seen is decreased battery life because of all the background tasks being done. That and the constantly reloading of apps do to more memory being used by iOS 7.

    I did have another issue on both devices, where somehow all my music (iTunes Match downloads), somehow got flagged as "Other Data" and couldn't be removed. I fixed this on my iPad 2 by turning off iTunes Match and doing a hard reset. For my iPhone 4S, nothing short of a restore fixed it. Both devices updated from iOS 6.1.3 OTA.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. am waiting by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    After listening to the frustrations of our iOS devs working to get our app ready for iOS 7, I'm waiting a couple of months before upgrading. Give lazy app producers time to patch their stuff before taking the plunge. Or maybe I'll just wait until 7.0.1 / 7.1.

  29. Re:yawn by immaterial · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you're forgetting how much animation there was in iOS 6 just because you got used to it, whereas the iOS 7 ones are different and are therefore noticeable. Other than the parallax effect and the translucence/blur, which I'd already mentioned, where else are there animations/eye candy where there weren't before? Folders opened with an animation (slide up rather than zoom in), the springboard loaded with an animation (swoop in from the sides rather than fall in from above), views slid from one to the next before just as they do now. And you're forgetting the subtle skeumorphic animations in certain controls that are now gone altogether, like the shine on the metallic volume slider knob that tracked the motion of the phone.

    It's not that I don't think ios 7 puts more strain on the hardware - it does, especially with the translucent blur (which is why the blur is disabled on the iPhone 4). I just don't think it qualifies as "more eye candy." Mostly *different* eye candy, the worst of which is disableable if you need to improve performance.

  30. No by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    I'm running it on an iPhone 4 and iPhone 5 and have noticed no slow downs. The 4 is actually a bit faster than it was under iOS 6. The only issues I've really seen from anyone is people complaining about the animations eating away fractions of seconds of their precious little lives.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  31. is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When i started using Linux, it would run just fine on my 486DX33 with 8 MB of RAM. Now when I try to run it on machines with 50x that spec it is slow.

    Newsflash: hardware requirements increase with new features. Supporting end of life hardware that hasn't been made for multiple generations in new platforms holds back said platform. Whether it is iOS, WIndows, Linux or whatever.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:is Linux slow? by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Actually, I run a modern version of the Linux Kernel on hardware slower than a 486 every day, though I admit I have access to a whopping 16 MB of RAM.

      Seems snappy enough to me.

    2. Re:is Linux slow? by xombo · · Score: 1

      There already are.

    3. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      They already disable new features on old hardware. On even older hardware (3+ years out of warranty, multiple years past expected battery expiry), you still have the old OS.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    4. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      Mobile devices are on an accelerated timeline. There's nothing stopping users of old hardware running the old, designed-for-device iOS (or Android, etc.), if their device is still alive. Many well past their use by date in terms of battery, desired feature set, etc.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    5. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      Maybe i should clarify - i wasn't referring specifically to the kernel. But a distribution including Kernel + X11 environment. I used to run X11 on my old 486.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    6. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that I could get Linux running on 15 year old computer hardware just fine. I may not turn on all the whizbang graphics, but it will work.

      So could I. It would have no new features. Which brings up the crux of the issue: why bother to support zero new features? Security fixes? Maybe, but again the hardware has been EOL'd for some time now and most likely no longer works due to battery expiry, damage, etc.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    7. Re:is Linux slow? by TyFoN · · Score: 1

      I have newest linux, X and XFCE on a dual pentium pro 200 mhz. It has a bit more ram, but it still is about 18 years old.

      I must admit, I don't run big regression analysis in R on this one, but it works fine for when friends want to browse the web a bit.

      It also fits nicely in my "museum" :)

    8. Re:is Linux slow? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I remember 10 years ago Linux took minutes to boot on my PC, now Ubuntu starts up in about 30 seconds and looks much better.

      Similarly Windows XP took about 40 seconds to start. My Windows 8 laptop takes under 4 seconds to boot from cold. Of course, Vista was the exception.

      Newsflash: Most operating systems are getting faster, not slower. You can cherry pick examples like Vista or compare an ancient version of Linux that is in no way comparable to a modern version, but the overall trend is quite clear and obvious.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:is Linux slow? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I think VESA was 32 bits per pixel IRRC.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about low level kernel features. And yes I've been running linux for about 20 years now so I do have an idea.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      What's your point? If you must know it was 16 bit 1024x768. I also had an amiga back in the day which shat on X11 from a great height. However it didn't run on beefy (at the time) PC hardware.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      Pentium pro is a lot more powerful than the original boxes Linux ran on like 386sx and up.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    13. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      Also... i had a pentium pro 180 running squid on debian for 500 ISP users back in the day...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    14. Re:is Linux slow? by smash · · Score: 1

      Put them both on the same hardware and see how they fare. Hardware is getting faster.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    15. Re:is Linux slow? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I remember 10 years ago Linux took minutes to boot on my PC

      In 2003, Linux was taking minutes to boot? What were you doing wrong? Running it on mid 90s hardware?

      now Ubuntu starts up in about 30 seconds and looks much better.

      On a completely different PC. It certainly wouldn't do so on that 1990s PC you were using in 2003.

      Newsflash: Most operating systems are getting faster, not slower.

      No they are not. The hardware is.

      Now sometimes OSs do get faster ON THE SAME HARDWARE. It depends on your starting point. The early versions of OSX all got faster with each release, because there were a lot of easy wins like caching and hashing opportunities. But the more you optimise for the next release, the harder wins are to find for the version after that.

      But in general, new versions of OSs bring new features, that need more memory, and they make the OS a little slower. But that's more then compensated for by the ever increasing speed and memory capacity of the computers that run them.

      Try to run the latest version of Android on an old Android phone, and it'll be sluggish, just as doing that on iOS will.

  32. Re:Yes by smash · · Score: 2

    Also, android handsets don't get new OS releases 3 years later to compare.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  33. Peachy once iCloud is off by cpct0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Update went well on my iPhone 4 (not S). Still am getting used to some elements. For example, the "ok" to unlock is kind of really unclear, and as such, I have doubts on putting nondescript text as buttons instead of having them shown with a rounded rect button frame.

    I had MAJOR slowdowns everytime I was writing some line of text. I mean major MAJOR, like the UI freezing for 10 seconds, then putting all the text I was blindly writing, and then freezing for yet another 10 seconds. Then, Mr. Interwebz found the solution, which is to disable iCloud synchro for documents & settings ... and from that point on, no more battery hug, no more slowdowns, and everything is quite responsive.

    So far, like it!

    1. Re:Peachy once iCloud is off by Demoknight · · Score: 1

      Third person perspective here. My dad upgraded his 4 (not S) to 7. I thought it was pretty slow/boring on 6... now it seems slow (wouldn't really say slower) and much less boring on 7. iCloud terms of service wasn't coming up (some network error). Wound up showing him the notification bar and he got a big kick out of that. I'm surprised that Apple doesn't have tutorials ala Android for new features - unless I'm just unaware.

      Off-topic but happened to upgrade one of my Verizon lines to the Moto X (kept Unlimited too - woot) and I'm loving it. Definitely feels like a relatively minor upgrade over the Nexus 4 but it's an upgrade with VZW 4G and that's what I was missing.

    2. Re:Peachy once iCloud is off by KJE · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, what phone do you have? I'm seeing slowdowns like this on my iPhone 4, I'll give turning off iCloud a try. Thanks.

  34. Re:reboot by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    This. I did have to do this once after the upgrade on my iPhone 4 (and after the usual reboot the upgrade does automatically) and it's been smooth sailing ever since.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  35. Re:yawn by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have to admire apple for their ingenuity. What better way to force people to ditch that old phone than to update the OS, make it more resource hungry with fancy schmancy animations that can't be turned off by the user? I used to own an iPhone 3 a few years ago, and when they forced an update onto it that basically made it useless, I decided there and then to switch to Android. Never looked back.

    If the Apple way is so important to you, then I guess you have to accept it. For me, it was a simple choice.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  36. It's slow and just plain ugly by deanklear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's definitely slower and I regret upgrading.

    There's not enough white space to provide any visual separation on a device so small when there is not even an attempt at drawing lines or separating elements. Almost everything is smaller and harder to read, and it's not obvious what is a "button" and what is just text in a corner somewhere. In fact, many of the improvements are simple knock offs of Android has had for a while. The world will soon be divided into Upswipers and Downswipers.

    I was thinking about updating my 4S, but while 7 was a step forward for some usability cases, I'm not sure I want to stick around for whatever is next. I am tired of not having full access to the hardware, and when I heard Ives was going to cut out cruft, I didn't imagine he was going to replace the whole system with the Office 2012 theme. Unfortunately for us, they're both based upon the premise that everyone wants to live in pure white Helvetica purgatory, and I don't think most of us do.

    It's probably a consequence of his background in hardware. When you cut elements out of real materials down to their simplest possible form, there is still depth and innate information because it is a physical object. When you remove all delineation and depth from two dimensional representations, new users cannot even guess at your purpose when it looks like a blank sheet of paper with text and small iconography scattered around randomly on top of it. While the elements look much better on larger screens (as found in this informal poll), things like the slot-machine style picker are not very obvious when you're scrolling around. I don't think they did much real world testing with new users on actual devices.

    tl:dr; If you're a first year art student, you will absolutely love iOS 7. If you prefer to have some visual cues on what is content and what is part of the interface, you may want to hold off until Apple allows graphic designers capable of using more than one color back on the team.

    1. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by AdamHaun · · Score: 2

      I agree with your criticisms. I have found a way to fix one thing, if it helps:

      Almost everything is smaller and harder to read, and it's not obvious what is a "button" and what is just text in a corner somewhere.

      In the accessibility options, turning on "Bold Text" will make the app names in the home screen bold again, which makes them much easier to read. Unfortunately, the other problems seem to be unfixable so far.

      --
      Visit the
    2. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      tl:dr; If you're a first year art student, you will absolutely love iOS 7. If you prefer to have some visual cues on what is content and what is part of the interface, you may want to hold off until Apple allows graphic designers capable of using more than one color back on the team.

      Ok ... I wouldn't buy any of the iPhone 5C line except the white one simply because of the super bright preschooler's toy colours. Similarly I can't say I'm a fan of the colours choices they made in the OS or the flat buttons either. As to the lack of traditional visual cues on what is content and what is part of the interface and what is not? What Ives and his team has done with the iOS 7 interface is move it closer to the style used in web-apps and the web today has it's own rules about what is clickable and what is not and those rules are not what they used to be in the dot-com bubble back in the 1990s. It didn't take me long to get used to a lack of traditional visual cues in iOS 7 because I am already familiar with it from browsing modern web pages where traditional interface elements have often disappeared or been modded with Cascading Style Sheets until they are unrecognisable. Where there used to be HTML buttons there are now pictures, and clickable links who used to be easy to distinguish because they were blue and underlined now look like any other highlighted text much of the time thanks again to CSS. Somehow I still manage to browse the web so I think I can handle iOS 7 even if I don't agree with some of Ive's aesthetic choices. I'm also not the kind of person who abhors any kind of change, If that was the case I'd still be punching away at a Windows XP laptop, or in my case, more likely an Old Pentium laptop running MWM on top of Slackware.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

      This argument has never impressed me. As if unless you are a kernel coder, your opinion is irrelevant. He is critiquing some points of the UI style, and he's not alone in how he feels about them. Maybe you could step back from the debate, get some perspective and contribute to the discussion instead of just adding snarky comments

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    4. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      It seems most designers use the mottos 'thin is in', 'flat as a mat', 'white means bright', 'tiny font is what they want' and 'hooray for grey' as a framework when creating UI's nowadays.

      What really scares me is that these not-so-great UI design ideas from IOS7 will continue to creep into OSX.

    5. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by Moldiver · · Score: 1

      Kill App: Doubletap home, select the app, swipe the screenshot to the top -> dead

    6. Re:It's slow and just plain ugly by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How are you feeling now about the horizontal pinstripes in early OSX versions?

  37. Not Too Surprising by organgtool · · Score: 1

    Apple has traditionally tweaked their latest software to run its best on the latest hardware, sometimes at the cost of running slower on older hardware. In general, most performance tweaks have side effects that will vary based on the underlying hardware. While Apple could create different versions of iOS tuned for different hardware, that would cause another layer of fragmentation, which is something Apple tries to avoid. That, and the obvious fact that they can sell more hardware by focusing on tweaking the OS for the latest hardware.

  38. Re:There are exceptions to the speed issue by smash · · Score: 1

    Sure, there are exceptions. But expecting end of sale / end of life hardware to be supported by NEW OS releases is living in fantasy land.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  39. To the Asker by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    What iPhone are you and your friends running? Model makes a big difference - for instance, I'm on the 4. My performance is somewhat choppy at key animation points in the OS, but that's expected. So?

  40. Re:yawn by bkmoore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have to admire apple for their ingenuity. What better way to force people to ditch that old phone than to update the OS, make it more resource hungry...

    That's been going on for as long as there has been a computer industry.

  41. Re:IOS 7 Is Crazy Fast! by mikeroySoft · · Score: 1

    Poor taste.

  42. Re:yawn by immaterial · · Score: 1

    I used to own an iPhone 3 a few years ago, and when they forced an update onto it ...

    How did that happen? Updates have always been voluntary... Though of course you would be volunteering to quickly become incompatible with newer software, so I'll grant you it isn't the most convenient of choices.

  43. Re:yawn by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

    This. I had to update the iOS on my iPhone 3GS to run an app I needed, and my phone immediately got unbearably slow. It was awful. I ended up having to disable a bunch of the 'new' features which seems to have broken some old features as well just to make it sort of ok, and it's still slower than it was before.

    OTOH my phone is going on 4 years old now and it's been functional and handy, and I like the os, so I'm probably gonna buy an iPhone 5s pretty soon.

  44. After the update it becomes too slow by ruir · · Score: 1

    You have to reboot it once.

  45. Much Faster for Me by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

    My experience: Every operation is, or at least seems to be, much faster; and the UI seems much more responsive than iOS6.

    Have been using iOS7 for ~3days.

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
  46. Yes, slow by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Subjectively slower on my 4S, but Safari bookmarks are so slow to edit there is no doubt a bug there (type> wait 10 seconds > character appears in field).

    1. Re:Yes, slow by jimbo · · Score: 1

      Somebody mentioned disabling iCloud sync of docs and settings as an effective workaround. Might work for you.

  47. Re:yawn by sjwt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not always with forced updates though.

    Could you imagine turning on your old 486-DX266 and being told it was now installing windows 7

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  48. Icons by Clsid · · Score: 1

    It seems I'm the only one but I feel the change of those icons is horrible. Flat design might be ok for windows, etc, while the blur and other effects are cool, but the fonts are thinner and even when you use the Bold option in accessibility, it still doesn't read as good as it read before. I guess with a shiny Retina display it is awesome, but for an iPad mini it doesn't work extremely well. I really can't wait until the industry hit The Next Big Thing TM and focus away from flat design. It might be cool for some things but I really dislike all that white space in stuff like the new Office in Windows 8 and the Setting and Mail app on iOS7.

  49. Re:yawn by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    I like how they changed the pop up message boxes. Used to be a bubble that would bounce into focus. The animation for the new versioning much shorter, and it feels much more responsive.

  50. Best model to upgrade to iOS 7 on is iPhone 4 by Arduenn6058 · · Score: 1

    On my iPhone 4

    Overall, it feels snappier, but that may be psychological, since the interface looks cleaner. Also, I see a lot of negative comments of 'new iPhone' owners regarding the slowness because of all the animations. I don't see those. Maybe because they are automatically disabled on the iPhone 4. Perhaps, the iPhone 4, of all compatible models, is the best one to upgrade iOS 7 on.

    Scrolling is slower. in iOS 6, the scrolling page appeared to be subjected to a certain amount of inertia. I.e. it kept on scrolling for a little bit even after you stopped dragging. Also, the faster you swiped your finger up, the more inertia there seemed to be. It was helpful in scrolling though lengthy pages. All that seems to be gone now. At least in Safari.

    Skype is broken in iOS 7 on several points: (i) longer time tags are capped, '20' rather than '20.39', (ii) sending photographs and video messages is broken now. And there's no update available yet.

    1. Re:Best model to upgrade to iOS 7 on is iPhone 4 by NoZart · · Score: 1

      we tested it on a ip4, too. Weirdly, we hat performance problems. It behaved like android 2.0. Choppy scrolling everywhere, laggy interface and so on. Mind you this was just installed and no configuration except activation was done....

  51. Re:yawn by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine turning on your old iPhone 1 and being told it was now installing iOS 7?

  52. iPad 3 by pbjones · · Score: 4, Informative

    Feels a little faster in some areas like web browsing, generally about the same, but I prefer the old UI.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  53. Re: yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can get to the unlock keypad in less than 0.5 seconds. This is on iOS 7 on an old slow iPhone 4.

    Just tap Home or Unlock hardware button then almost immediately slide the touchscreen to unlock. Use two fingers if you're not dextrous.

    The unlock keyboard is displayed an responsive to taps in under 500ms.

    Maybe it's slower on the higher-end phones?

  54. Revert back to iOS6 or stop all animations? by npetrov · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to 1) revert back to iOS6 after the update or 2) stop all these animations? Android has an option to stop all animations. I saw Apple has an option to disable some. Is there a tool/hack to disable all?

  55. Re:yawn by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "That said, I notice no slowdowns on my iPhone 5 or 3rd gen iPad."

    Same thing on my 4S.

    The only thing that bugged me was that gamecenter always popped up when I wanted to do a solo game, I tried everything to kill it, apparently there's lots of people complaining when I searched for a solution.

    After a loooong fiddle I found that even if you're logged out, it still knows you're there, because of the appleID field, where your loginname still stays after having logged out.

    To kill it you have to fail a login with a fake ID and fake password, then the next time you just press cancel and it will show up no more.

  56. Re: Which iDevice? by sosume · · Score: 1

    Why would it? I have upgraded my galaxy tablet with each new Android version and it becomes faster each time.

  57. Re:yawn by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    My iTunes just tells me there's an update for my iPhone and asking if I want to install it, with the option of doing it now, doing it later (which is just "bother me next time I sync"), or never ask me about this again. I'm not sure how that's a forced update.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  58. Faster on newer devices, slower on old by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 1

    It is very responsive and very quick both loading applications and content within. Safari is quicker to load and browse pages and very responsive.

    I loaded iOS 7 on my mates iPhone 4 and it added half a second to load any apps and transition. It was painful. The only upside was, once again, inside Safari loading pages was quicker.

    iOS 7 seems no slower on my iPad Mini either.

  59. Re:yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Protip: you don't have to wait for the fade to finish in lock screen.

  60. Re:yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure how that's a forced update.

    Because you can never go back to 6.1.3 now. (officially .. w/o jailbreak, etc). If you have any problem with your phone and you need to reinstall the OS .. you are screwed - you *have* to install iOS 7. Or if you decide to upgrade to 7 just to "see what it was like" and found it slow on your particular hardware, too bad, you cant go back. - This is especially bad for "dated" hardware like the iPhone 4.

  61. Arstechnica reviews iOS 7 on the iPhone 4 by IYagami · · Score: 1

    http://arstechnica.com/apple/2013/09/new-lease-on-life-or-death-sentence-ios-7-on-the-iphone-4/

    "When asked whether you should install iOS 6 on an iPhone 3GS, we can say "yes" without hesitation or condition. When it comes to the iPhone 4 and iOS 7, our response is a more measured "do it if you like the new features, but have you considered a newer phone?"

    iOS 7 on Apple's oldest-supported hardware is hardly a disaster, but it's apparent that the only reason Apple issued this update was because they were selling the iPhone 4 free with contract up until September 10. It has been their value option for a year, and in the Apple ecosystem, even people who bought a new iPhone 4 on September 9 will get at least a year's worth of updates. The A4 simply isn't up to the task of rendering iOS 7 as Apple intended, and the upgrade in general performance and apparent smoothness between even the iPhone 4 and year-newer 4S is significant (to say nothing of the iPhone 5, 5C, and 5S).

    When it comes to launching apps, the iPhone 4's general slowness is only exacerbated by the too-long animation durations in iOS 7. This is also a problem on the faster phones and tablets, but at least there you've got faster underlying hardware to keep everything moving at a steady clip.

    It's great that Apple isn't abandoning older iPhone owners really. People buying an iPhone 4 free with contract were still getting a phone that felt reasonably fast with iOS 6, and they weren't necessarily aware that they were getting an older single-core SoC with an older, slower GPU that would be ill-suited for Apple's new direction. At least they have the option to upgrade. That said, the iPhone 4 and iOS 7 just can't quite provide an experience that's up to Apple's usual standard. Apply the update if there's an iOS 7 feature (or an iOS 7-only app) that you need in your life, but our recommendation now would either be to wait for potential performance boosts in a future iOS 7 update or to start looking into a new iPhone 5C or 5S."

    1. Re:Arstechnica reviews iOS 7 on the iPhone 4 by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's great that Apple isn't abandoning older iPhone owners really.

      iPod touch owners, on the other hand, are feeling abandoned. Up until October 11 of last year, Apple was still selling the fourth-generation iPod touch, and now it can't run iOS 7.

  62. Re:yawn by greggman · · Score: 1

    I see them. The zoom in / zoom out of of the home screen often stutters for me.

  63. Re:Yes by Wingsy · · Score: 1

    That's hittin the nail on the head.

    --
    If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
  64. Liar by arcite · · Score: 4, Informative

    I downgraded my iPad back to 6.1.3.... It's perfectly doable.

    1. Re:Liar by jittles · · Score: 3, Informative

      I downgraded my iPad back to 6.1.3.... It's perfectly doable.

      You must have an iPad 1. It is impossible to downgrade any iOS device after the iPhone 4S/iPad 2. You cannot do anything meaningful with the SHSH blobs. So its perfectly doable for you, and a handful of people on older hardware. But it is not perfectly doable in general.

    2. Re:Liar by Kahlandad · · Score: 1

      The max iOS that the original iPad can run is iOS 5.1.1, so he must be talking about a later model. That being said, I downgraded my iPhone 5 to 6.1.4 after playing around with iOS 7, so you're comment is wrong regardless.

    3. Re:Liar by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You must have an iPad 1.

      No, an iPad 1 cannot even run iOS 6.1.3. In fact I'm pretty sure the last version of iOS the iPad 1 could run was 5.1.

    4. Re:Liar by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      I downgraded my iPad back to 6.1.3.... It's perfectly doable.

      You must have an iPad 1. It is impossible to downgrade any iOS device after the iPhone 4S/iPad 2. You cannot do anything meaningful with the SHSH blobs. So its perfectly doable for you, and a handful of people on older hardware. But it is not perfectly doable in general.

      Um, no. The iPad 1 cannot run iOS 6.x, much less anything higher to "downgrade" from.

  65. Re: Which iDevice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps that is more a sign of how poor the previous versions of Android were, they finally started getting it right?

  66. Yes by Tridus · · Score: 1

    Aside from the animations making things take longer, performance is choppier than it used to be on my iPad 3. Even typing in some apps now lags at times, and it never did that before.

    Looking enviously at my wife's Nexus 7 2nd gen, that thing flies.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  67. Re:yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is slashdot where the users get annoyed about having to wait 5 ms for a response, but don't care about having to wait days compile their own kernel and userspace to get things just they way they want them, only to have to do it all over again in three months.

  68. Major problem after upgrading! by jgeorger · · Score: 2

    After upgrading my iphone 5 the phone has many times gone unresponsive after sleeping. Sometimes it might come back 20-30 minutes later, but I usually end up resetting the phone. A few times I've noticed a ~10 second freeze-up while using the phone. My phone was glitch-free with iOS 6. I've done a "reset all settings" which seemed to help a bit. I've also tried turning off the passcode lock and/or control center access while locked, which hasn't. Needless to say I'm extremely disappointed in Apple right now!

  69. Four iOS devices and all are ok by alen · · Score: 1

    Two iPhone 5's
    iPad 2
    iPad 4

    iPad 2 is a bit buggy with App Store cards but nothing major. Performance is good on all my devices

  70. Development speed by mgf64 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help noticing that iOS development got sensibly slower: XCODE 5 is a lot slower, and debug on the simulator is a dog: takes forever to launch on a relatively fast iMac with 16 Gb and solid state hard drive. This way XCode is adding minutes every time I need to recompile, relaunch, debug. In the course of the day this adds up...

    1. Re:Development speed by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Sure. But it does have lots of new features and improvements. They've obviously made huge and deep changes from XCode 4. Expect they'll speed it up and make it more stable in future releases.

  71. Seems faster to me by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 2

    I can delete my spam faster now.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  72. Re:Yes by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    Sure they do. There are plenty of older phones running newer Cyanogenmod versions.

  73. iPad 4 and iPhone 5 impressions by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    I've posted them up on my G+ account, so I'll just link to that instead of repeating myself here. Just remember, though, I come from a 3G to a 4 to a 5.

    https://plus.google.com/110699958808389605834/posts/STPAexQXV6H

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:iPad 4 and iPhone 5 impressions by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Uh, podcasts moved to a separate App in iOS 6.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  74. Re:yawn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    You have to have the updates if you want the latest features though. Google releases most features as app updates so even old devices running 2.3 get them, but with iOS you need the latest OS version.

    Currently I'm on Google Maps 6 because they removed the "navigate without destination" feature in 7. I'm on the latest OS version though, because I have the ability to update each individually.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  75. Re:yawn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    It's not that I don't think ios 7 puts more strain on the hardware - it does

    Interesting decision by Apple there. They could have banked the battery life improvements they made, but instead decided to spend them on new eye candy.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  76. Not on my iPad 2. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm running iOS 7.0 on my iPad 2 and did not experience any slowdown issues--in fact, Safari in iOS 7.0 renders web pages a lot faster than before.

    However, I did see one noticeable issue: the graphical design--especially the text fonts--don't look good on an iPad 2 with its lower-resolution screen. I've seen the final iOS 7.0 on an 4th-generation iPad and thanks to its "Retina Display" resolution touchscreen, it does look really good.

    1. Re:Not on my iPad 2. by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

      However, I did see one noticeable issue: the graphical design--especially the text fonts--don't look good on an iPad 2 with its lower-resolution screen.

      I noticed the same about the fonts on my iPad 2.
      Go to Settings>General>Accessibility and turn on "Bold Text". It's a much better experience.

  77. Significantly slower! by HnT · · Score: 1

    Often times I find tiny micro-freezes during animations when switching apps or scrolling... it is horrible.

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
  78. Re:yawn by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I can see your point. Back when every windows upgrade required twice the ram and double the speed in processor I was happy to use linux and avoid the nonsense. A friend of mine has the new i0S7 on his iPhone5 and he seems happy with it but I am not all that impressed with iCandy. It's pretty but if it gets in the way there needs to be a way to turn it off.

  79. Re: yawn by frangalista · · Score: 3, Informative

    The reason that third party apps are not supported is because XCodedrops those versions. As a developer I'm faced with the Faustian bargain of continuing older versions or supporting new versions. OF course Apple controls XCode too...

  80. On an iPad 3, slow no. Slower. Yeah. Somewhat by tigersha · · Score: 2

    Yes there is a slight... delay here and there. Dunno. It does not feel slow, but it is not butter-smooth
    anymore either.

    That said, I like the new UI.

    I am still a bit hesitant to upgrade my iPhone 4, because of my experience a few years ago with an upgrade on
    an iPhone 3 which definitely was not pleasant.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  81. Re:yawn by EvilIdler · · Score: 2

    The funny thing is that even older devices (at least iPhone 4 and iPad 2, possibly others) which can upgrade to iOS7 don't have all those flashy effects. The backgrounds in popups are relatively flat, mostly opaque on my iPad, for instance. So no, it doesn't look like they activated effects my device can't handle in an effort to make me upgrade :)

  82. Re: Which iDevice? by someones · · Score: 1

    You could read your line as: Android is delivering performance optimization, where Apple does not.
    And, if you ever wrote some code you know "there is nothing to be optimized" is a lie.

  83. Re:IOS 7 Is Crazy Fast! by theskipper · · Score: 1

    Too soon.

  84. Re:yawn by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine turning on your old 486-DX266 and being told it was now installing windows 7

    I'd wait a few minutes and take the opportunity to have a big old belly laugh over it. Goodness knows, I could use it (the laugh I mean).

  85. Re:yawn by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    Sounds exactly like Microsoft. Haven't they done this for the last 20 years? Each new generation of Windows has doubled some hardware requirement such as CPU speed and available memory. Now that Speeds aren't increasing, MS has decided that they need to increase RAM and Storage Capacity as much as possible for each generation.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  86. Slow scrolling issue here on 4s, but mainly on /.? by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    So I too noticed slow scrolling in Safari on my 4s after upgrading to iOS 7 but it seems to be site specific. Here on Slashdot the issue is very noticeable. Less so on most other sites I've visited. Overall I believe iOS 7 is a faster performing OS, but I believe the hardware on the 4s isn't quite up to snuff for everything iOS 7 has to offer. I'm looking forward to an upgrade to a 5s after the excitement dies down a bit - probably next month. I'm expecting some blazing speed out of my device then.

  87. It's faster by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    iOS7 is noticeably faster. I'm not a fan of the interface changes, many of which just seem to be for the purpose of change rather than actual improvement. What I wish most of all is that they would focus on legacy support. Quite frankly, they should support all hardware back to the original iPhone and gracefully fall back on features that just don't work. This would bring all users forward. Simultaneously they should support all software back to the original MacOS and even the Lisa and Apple I, II and III. They have the computational power to do the emulation. Legacy support is much more useful than these color changes.

  88. iPad 4 Sluggish in places by DarkXale · · Score: 1

    Sluggish to react to homescreen presses (whether its to return to homescreen or just enter the 'multitasking menu'), and when in the Settings app and tapping one of the sections - it often takes about half a second for the options on the right to load, sometimes upwards a second. Responsive sure as damn hell isn't what I'd call it - and theres not even animations causing the delay. The core OS is just plain slow. It also doesn't respond reliably to swipe-up gestures in order to force-close apps, normally taking several attempts before it gets what I'm trying to do.

  89. Re:yawn by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

    Not always with forced updates though.

    Which IOS7, for all its faults, is most definitely not.

    You do not have to update to the newest version and - as far as I know - you can't /automatically/ update anyway (the device will check and download the update, but you still have to manually start the installation). Your device will continue to work with the older version of iOS, and so will your apps (although some app updates may require later versions of iOS, they will not install if you have an incompatible operating system). The update may be required to get additional features but it is not required to keep using the device and is not forced upon you.

    So this is more like having an PC with Windows XP and being alerted that Windows 7 is available. Depending on your hardware configuration, the new OS may require more resources than your PC can provide, but if you decide to install anyway, it's your own damn fault.

    There are a lot of problems of how Apple manages the relationship between itself and its customers with which to take issue without any need to fabricate new ones.

  90. Re:yawn by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    Not always with forced updates though.

    Could you imagine turning on your old 486-DX266 and being told it was now installing windows 7

    Except nobody is forcing you to install iOS7.

  91. iOS7 programmer here by Coditor · · Score: 1

    Blur is definitely a real slowdown, we deliberately used our own nav bars to avoid it. It's especially sluggish on any scrolling list. Of course this is not turned on for iPhone 4. You also have to realize that this OS is so new we didn't have a new beta for the last month before it was released and that meant no time to really optimize anything. Even Apple barely got it completed enough to ship. On the iPad it's still beta as far as I can see. They only started the whole UI transition in Nov of last year and that simply wasn't enough time to get everything optimized. Changing the UI and much of the frameworks underlying an OS in less than a year has never been done to this level. It amazes me it works at all. Still it will take a few updates until it catches up. By then you won't notice issues any more. Remember how long it took MS to go from XP to Win 7?

  92. Re:yawn by longk · · Score: 1

    BS. Please use Google. Many how-to's, no jail break required.

  93. Re:yawn by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    yes and no. I could get windows 7 running on a machine with less hardware than I could with vista. I havent tried but i hear windows 8 does not need more specs as well. previous to windows 7 you would be totally correct however.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  94. Re:yawn by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, I don't find the IOS7 popups as irritating as the 'bounce once and leave OK and Cancel button are disabled-wait 2 seconds-do a second bounce-now enable the OK and Cancel buttons to allow the user to press one' popups from IOS6 and before.

  95. Wallpaper by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    Changing wallpaper on an iPad 3 takes anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds. For comparison, wallpaper changes are pretty much instant on an iPad1 in IOS 5.1.1.

  96. Re:yawn by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    I thought all software updates were supposed to include a "snappier" thing, that all iFans can be pleased about? That makes this story newsworthy by itself!

    More seriously, I was under the impression they'd moved back from the composited transparency layered shadowed Mac OS X style interface to something more minimalist, modelled on the UIs that started coming out in the late 1990s when 3D outlines for buttons became considered passe (Android went in the same direction with ICS & Jelly Bean.) So I'm genuinely surprised this update would actually cause the UI to become slower.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  97. Re:yawn by calzones · · Score: 1

    I am not able to slide to unlock until the text is visible. New screen lets you slide anywhere so exact position is not the problem in this case.

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
  98. Re:Yes by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Android handsets don't need a new OS for 3 years after release. My Nexus One from years back is doing just fine using version 2.2, IIRC. There's still plenty of apps that work for it and I can't recall ever having found an app that I needed which wasn't supported. The only exceptions are cases where the necessary hardware wasn't in the phone. Whereas iOS developers don't even bother supporting older phones in most cases.

    Bottom line here is that apart from the die hard fanbois, iOS isn't particularly special and you're looking at a $650 phone that was creamed by the Nexus 4 last generation, a phone that cost a full $300 less. And looks likely to get creamed again by the successor.

  99. Re:yawn by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    Folder open/close animation is slightly but noticeably longer, and the springboard/homescreen loading takes twice as long as under iOS6. I can see this clearly on my iOS7 4S vs my iOS6 5. These seem to be built-in to the animations of iOS7 itself, rather than being caused by older hardware.

    I wish this didn't change my perception that iOS7 is a bit slower, but it is literally visible as soon as I start using it (unlocking to springboard/homescreen). 3 years ago when I experimented with jailbreaking, one of the best ones was reducing all animation time by half.

  100. Its worse than that. iOS 7 upgrade is mediocre. by SoftCafe+Crew · · Score: 1

    Trusting in the Steve Jobs Legacy, I eagerly upgraded both of my Apple iPads (2nd & 3rd gen) to iOS 7. But I was sorely disappointed. The quality is not what we have come to expect from Apple. I learned long ago not to update my MicroSoft packages with such reckless abandon. Luckily, I have not yet "upgraded" my iPhone 4S. And I still have my Android. I would pay a premium to restore my iOS 7 devices to iOS 6, so they are once again east to read.

  101. I'd pay a premium to take my iPad back to iOS6 by SoftCafe+Crew · · Score: 1

    Using the heretofore interoperable Calendar on both iPad & iCloud as an example for my preliminary analysis: The pastel colors are pasty, not vibrant as in iOS 6. The ruled lines (from TOD on left to event) are too faint to see. The text strokes are too narrow to read. But with the BOLD option in my iOS 7 settings, the text is no longer sharp. These calendar layouts are now all but unreadable (for my less than young eyes). Worse, the icons now look shallow and cheap. I no longer have Pride of Ownership in these devices that as I had last week. Given this week's degradation, I would not have switched from Android to Apple. I trusted you guys (Apple), and am consequently sorely disappointed.

  102. Eye & repetitive strain for Baby Boomers by SoftCafe+Crew · · Score: 1

    Turning off Apps is no longer a simple tap. The swipe up does not always work, so I must redo it two or three times. That may be OK for young folk, but quickly turns into muscle-strain for me. This nicely compliments the eye-strain from the new iPad layout. Apple should remember that Baby Boomers will soon outnumber them.

    1. Re:Eye & repetitive strain for Baby Boomers by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The number of baby boomers are in decline, since you know, people die and no new babies are being born 50 years ago.

  103. Re:yawn by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a 'forced update' on an iPhone. They are ALWAYS optional.

  104. Re:yawn by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure you understand the concept of "forced update" versus "cannot downgrade".

  105. Re:yawn by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    So, all those security issues in the base OS is irrelevant? Or shouldn't you say, they are forced to release everything as an app update because their partners screw the customers over by refusing to push updates out.

  106. Re:Yes by smash · · Score: 1

    Hows the security updates?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  107. Re:yawn by Dahamma · · Score: 2

    I could go through dozens of examples (and many are small, but that's kind of the point of "eye candy"). Here are a bunch more (that did NOT exist on the old one, so definitely "more" eye candy):

    - messages - each message animates independently in its own bubble so they "bounce" around (I have no idea WHY they bothered with this...)
    - weather - the background weather/clouds/etc is animated (this was subtle but kind of cool). But if that's not the definition of added eye candy what the heck is!?
    - clock - the icon is now actually a real clock, showing the current time with a moving second hand (this would almost be a "feature" if the digital clock at the top of the phone wasn't still much easier to read)
    - camera - the whole switch from video/camera/pano with swipe and an animation/blur/focus effect.
    - Safari - now has 3D stacked tabs (which clearly uses the 3D hardware)
    - app switcher - now has screenshots for every running app, and smooth scrolling through them (in fact, *differential smooth scrolling* for the screenshots and icons)
    - siri - several small effects... but I think I made my point...

  108. Re:yawn by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    In fairness, on virtually every platform updates are frequently only superficially voluntary. Support ends. Third party support ends. Third party support for Third Party support ends (eg. that app you run has a security hole in it? It's fixed in the latest version, but that only runs on ${YOUR PLATFORM VERSION+2}

    In the early 2000s I got myself a Mac and switched to Mac OS X. I liked it. I really did.

    But having not really jumped on the "mainstream platform" thing, well, pretty much ever, I suddenly found the whole upgrades thing was more of a problem than I thought. My toe-in-the-water Mac turned out to be too old to run 10.3 without nasty hacks. The laptop I bought that seemed relatively up to date after I bought it and did run 10.3 was too old to run 10.4. And 10.3 and 10.4 had features I liked, and many, many, I didn't.

    To run a recent version of Java, I had to have a recent version of Mac OS X. To have a recent version of Mac OS X, I had to upgrade my hardware. Regardless of that, running a recent version of Mac OS X would not necessarily be an "upgrade", in that I didn't like a lot of the changes. And at that time a new version of Mac OS X seemed to be coming out every 1-2 years, costing $130 a pop - if I didn't buy a new Mac with it pre-installed for a small fortune. (To add insult to injury I didn't even like Apple's hardware!)

    So, relunctantly, I switched back to GNU/Linux, eventually settling on Ubuntu which, at least, was "mainstream" but the updates are free and Ubuntu's attitude to hardware support is more liberal.

    This isn't a dig at Apple specifically, especially as immediately after I switched back to Linux they seemed to get better and software update prices went down, and became less frequent. But it is "how it works", generally in the proprietary software world. You might like Mac OS X Jaguar, you might like Windows 2000, you might love AmigaOS 2.1 or 3.0. But you have no choice, ultimately, you do end up having to move to something else, no matter how much you might convince yourself otherwise.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  109. Re:No. by smash · · Score: 1

    Lol. you're comparing the X11 stack and claiming superiority :)

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  110. No Choice by Cammi · · Score: 1

    Some people had no choice. I woke up yesterday morning and ios7 was automatically installed ... F U Apple.

    1. Re:No Choice by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That troll under your bed must have installed it.

  111. Re: yawn by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    The updates aren't forced. You're talking out your ass.

  112. You are the Liar. by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    You cant use SHSH blobs now. Apple has introduced the APTicket mechanism which makes them useless.

    http://www.iphonehacks.com/2013/09/cannot-downgrade-ios-7-ios-6-1-3-ios-6-1-4.html

  113. Re:yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    Apple is choosing what version of iOS I can and can't use on a device that *I OWN*. Good job defending that,

  114. Re:yawn by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    You have to admire apple for their ingenuity. What better way to force people to ditch that old phone than to update the OS, make it more resource hungry...

    That's been going on for as long as there has been a computer industry.

    Not at all! You could always keep your old OS in your computer. The "great innovation" of apple is to FORCE YOU TO UPGRADE if you need to reinstall the OS, whether you like it or not. They do it simply by not signing the old OS anymore. Then voila, your formerly perfectly adequate phone has become slow and useless.

    I also moved to android some 6 months ago. I really appreciate that they do not try to force anything on you (well, if you exclude spying...). I have since ditched an iphone and an ipad, and have a nexus4 and a galaxy note 8.0. Do not miss the iOS way of doing business.

  115. Availability of apps for old OS by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's nothing stopping users of old hardware running the old, designed-for-device iOS (or Android, etc.)

    Other than that new applications and reinstalled applications are available only for the newer operating system. And other than that Apple requires installing the latest version of the OS; no downgrading from, say, iOS 4 on a 3GS should the user find it sluggish.

  116. Re:yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    If its so easy to find, then post a link detailing how to downgrade my iPhone 4S to 6.1.3.

    Apple is choosing what version of iOS I can and can't use on a device that *I OWN*. Don't know why you guys are defending such policies.

  117. iPT 5 not even a year old and no iOS 7 for iPT 4 by tepples · · Score: 1

    A year ago, Apple was still selling the fourth generation iPod touch. I imagine that devices purchased from September 22 through October 10 of last year are still under factory warranty, even if they aren't getting iOS 7. Perhaps Apple might have added the ability to download an app compatible with old iOS to keep fourth generation iPod touch users from making warranty claims.

  118. Brief window where both 6 and 7 can be installed by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    I downgraded my iPad back to 6.1.3.... It's perfectly doable.

    Its temporary. When new iOS versions are introduced there is generally a brief window of time where Apple's servers approve both versions for installation. After a little while the previous version will be removed from the approved list and only the new version will be approved from that point forward.

    If you with reinstall iOS 6 do not delay.

  119. Nexus is updated within a couple days by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't own an Android phone because data plans are so expensive. But I do know Google pushes out operating system updates to my ASUS Nexus 7 tablet within a couple days of their announced availability. I think it does the same to the GSM version of the LG Nexus 4 as well.

  120. iPad 1 only runs iOS 5. by perpenso · · Score: 2

    I downgraded my iPad back to 6.1.3.... It's perfectly doable.

    You must have an iPad 1. It is impossible to downgrade any iOS device after the iPhone 4S/iPad 2. You cannot do anything meaningful with the SHSH blobs. So its perfectly doable for you, and a handful of people on older hardware. But it is not perfectly doable in general.

    The first generation iPad won't upgrade past iOS 5.1.1.

    Downgrades are generally possible for a very brief time period when a new version is introduced. Apple does not seem to disable installation of the old version immediately upon release of the new version, it will happen, but there is a delay.

  121. Re:yawn by immaterial · · Score: 1

    You say in the early 2000's you bought a Mac that was ultimately not supported by OS X 10.3. 10.3 came out in November 2003 and supported all Macs models released in 1999 and later, and some Macs (iMacs) released in 1998. 10.4, which came out April 2005, supported all Macs released in 2000 onward. Your "toe in the water" Mac must have been around 3 years old already when you got it. I won't deny Apple likes to deprecate stuff faster than most companies, but I think that's due to their desire to move forward and the number of difficult transitions they've gone through (68k->PPC Processors, Classic MacOS->OSX, PPC->Intel, 32->64 bit). All of those things have ended up as OS support dividing lines.

    On the plus side, major OS releases are only $20 now.

  122. Depends upon the device by Dubious+Maximus · · Score: 1

    On my iPad Mini, 7 doesn't seem perceptibly any faster or slower than 6.1.x -- just different, which is a topic for another thread.

    My iPhone 4S, however, is a different story. It does indeed feel noticeably choppier/more sluggish in some respects. The dropping-out-of-warp starfield simulation the icons do when unlocking, for instance, often seems quite herky-jerky. There are other, intermittent, occurrences where the OS seems to just pause for a moment or two while it performs some sort of background process (clearing/swapping RAM contenets, perhaps), that just makes the whole experience of using the phone a tad more Jedi/Zen-like -- "patience, my young padawan". My 4S has only 16GB of storage, but 3GB free, so swapping RAM contents *shouldn't* be a problem of available space, no?

    And now if you'll permit me to mix metaphors -- that's my two cents, your mileage may vary.

  123. Re: yawn by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

    You're right, Apple should do what Android manufacturer do. Never update the OS On the phone and to earn extra kudos, ship new phones with under powered hardware and old OS versions.

    If Apple really wanted to be more customer focused they could allow carriers to install crapware on their phones to slow it down more.

  124. Works fin for me. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    On my 4S it's great (has been for weeks, Yes I had it for 3 weeks now) on my horribly out of date Ipad 3 it is just fine and the Wifes 5 it's speedy.
    On par with what it felt like before the update. No slower no faster than my two nexus 7's or the Nexus 4 I also carry every day.

    I did notice that a couple of the older apps that I have been refusing to update because the scumbag dev's added ad's into the app I paid for have problems with the new OS though.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  125. Deceptive upgrade by floops · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's slower all right. Normally I never get the first version of any new release (anything with .0 after it). But this one really pissed me off. All the notification offer said was "Upgrade available" without giving any indication of what it was. I thought it was another security upgrade, not a version upgrade. o it took forever to download. It turned out to be iOS7. It sucks. It's not only ugly but incredibly slow. I have the latest and greatest iPad. I need to find out how to go back to the old system.

  126. Re:yawn by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    You must be living on a different planet. As others have stated:

    1) You decide whether to upgrade to iOS 7 or not.
    2) Others have managed to restore back to iOS 6.

    So, how's the weather on your planet?

  127. Re:yawn by shokk · · Score: 1

    So are you of the Android bigots, Blackberry morons, or Windows ignorantly hopeful?

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  128. Not that thrilled by forrie · · Score: 1

    I love my iPhone. I've had one since the first model.

    iOS7 is "okay" - it has a few new bells and whistles, most of it is just the new UI. I can't say I'm all that impressed -- and honestly, the animation makes me dizzy! Even the Accessibility options to reduce the animation doesn't help.

    Word up, to Apple: you're going to have to cut the crap with these minor incremental upgrades -- Android is catching up, very quickly, as are other major manufacturers of 'droid platform (think: Samsung).

    Um, no biometrics please. Like I trust Apple to "keep it secret; keep it safe". Nope.

  129. Who cares by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    The iPhone is a horrible mobile platform, it's to small, poorly designed and leaves the user feeling like they were ripped off. The S3 still beats the iPhone everyday of the week hands down and backwards. The biggest upgrade Apple can do is to make the phone decent enough to use on a day to day basis, i have an iPhone for work and I hate it, it's the biggest piece of shit I've ever used. It's to small, to sluggish and it's software design makes me feel like high school students made it. I also have a S3 which I use everyday and it's hands down 10 thousand times better in every single aspect.

  130. Re:yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    You must be living on a different planet. As others have stated:

    Your planet seems to be the one where facts can be created just by stating them. On my planet, facts need to be supported by evidence.

    http://www.iphonehacks.com/2013/09/cannot-downgrade-ios-7-ios-6-1-3-ios-6-1-4.html

    1) You decide whether to upgrade to iOS 7 or not.

    False. Apple will force me to use iOS 7 whenever I reformat and restore my phone which I end up doing atleast once a year because the phone slows down after about a year of use.

    2) Others have managed to restore back to iOS 6.

    If you have a device that has the A5 or newer chip, you cannot downgrade the OS because Apple has fixed bugs people used earlier.

    Also *IF* and that's a big if some people (on some devices) have managed to restore the OS back go 6, they are using techniques that use flaws in Apples update process. They have to know in advance the steps that need to be taken. e.g. (If you happen to be the one of people that know how to.. and managed to cache their SHSH blobs in advance - note that this technique used to work but does not anymore). Apple *does not* allow you to downgrade.

    So, how's the weather on your planet?

    You can ask the voices in your head...

  131. Re: yawn by drcheap · · Score: 1

    You don't have to wait for the animation to fully complete. It will unlock even when halfway faded in. Maybe even sooner if you have good aim :)

  132. Slowdown seems mostly related to scrolling by PopHollywood · · Score: 1

    After using IOS 7 for a few days, we seem to notice slow scrolling (smooth and then stalls for a fraction of a second) while using Safari and Mail. Also web page buttons seem to have enough lag to occasionally cause double pressing.

  133. Re: yawn by calzones · · Score: 1

    Not sure what I'm doing wrong, but I cannot unlock it until the screen has faded in. I've tried with no luck to swipe before it comes in, but fat chance.

    And aim shouldn't be the issue since you can now swipe to unlock pretty much anywhere on the screen (and I agree that is an improvement)

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
  134. Re:yawn by tipo159 · · Score: 1

    I have a plain old iPhone 4 and iOS 7 works fine for me as far as speed and responsiveness. I have noticed a few more glitches on occasion, but it mostly works fine.

    I hate a bunch of the UI changes. Seems like elegance and simplicity has replaced what I thought was UI basics, like giving the user an indication of what text is a "button" that can be tapped and what text is just a label.

  135. Re: yawn by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still using an old version of XCode. Never upgraded XCode past the point where I started using it to develop apps; so never had to drop support for old versions, either iOS or OSX.

    The problem -- at least as it seems to me -- is primarily developers jumping on new versions of XCode, and using new, OS-level specific APIs, which in turn make old devices unable to run the code unless you're *very* careful and catch every instance of new API and make an alternate, home-brewed version available to do that job (or disable a feature.) That's possible, but not easy. And most developers don't do it consistently, which again seems to indicate it isn't all that easy (with Objective C, you can actually tell if a particular call is available to you, and of course, you can just pay attention to the OS rev level.) But basically, the more OS levels you concurrently support, the larger your support load is. No matter how you do it.

    To a lesser extent, but still problematic, Apple deprecates or breaks older APIs. That can be a real problem. Sometimes they never fix bugs, too; they just leave an older OS behind, bugs and broken features as-shipped, and wander off into the sunset with a new version, as if that was appropriate behavior. It's not: if you advertise X as having Y feature under, or as, Z OS, as far as I'm concerned, you're on the hook to make it work as advertised and you can't get off the hook by saying "oh, we fixed that in the next version (that doesn't work with a lot of your stuff, sucker.)"

    I've been able to keep earlier applications up and running and relatively healthy by simply not upgrading XCode. Do I miss some functionality? Yep. But my customers and users can at least count on their apps continuing to work as long as it remains in my power to manage that. And they don't have to upgrade their OS to make it happen, although they can still do so if they choose to without my stuff breaking.

    I went through this with Windows, but in the end, Microsoft so radically changed the way Windows worked -- from window metrics to internal operations -- that it became impossible. That's when I abandoned developing for Windows.

    Something that has shown considerable promise is Qt. They're still on the "we don't need to fix bugs, we'll just upgrade" train, but as a cross platform development tool, it really has potential. I've got a software defined radio application developed with Qt 4.7 (Qt 5 was very seriously broken last I looked) that makes some pretty serious demands in terms of CPU and a broad swath of APIs, and have been able to keep it running under both OSX and Windows, which I think says a lot for Qt. Again, staying away from the "upgrade" is one of the things that has kept my users in working software.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  136. Re:IOS 7 on an iPhone 4S by jc42 · · Score: 1

    iOS 7 does have improvements in several aspects, for example, battery life has improved greatly.

    My wife did the upgrade on her iPad a few days ago, and is shocked by the horrible battery life. She claims she isn't (yet ;-) doing anything different than what she was using it for before, but its battery dies overnight, while it used to last several days between charging. That's a rather radical change.

    I suggested googling for info, especially on settings that may be different than what she was using before. She found a few suggestions, and might know in a few days whether they had any effect.

    What I find disappointing is that we can't seem to find any good summary covering the issue, with a good collection of suggestion on how to deal with battery-life issues. There are zillions of "Well, I tried X, and it seems to have an effect" sort of comments, but nothing the least bit systematic.

    Of course, we may just be incompetent at finding such things in iOS land. But that describes much of the Apple fanboy crowd, really, so some good advice sites could contribute a lot to users' happiness levels.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  137. Re:yawn by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    Android isn't safe from the same issues. If your carrier is kind enough to continue supporting new versions, you have to make sure the hardware you have can do all the fancy new stuff. My wife's Xperia X10 never saw major updates, and that was probably for the best. It took a lot of ROM testing, tweaking, kernel patches, and resource management to make Jelly Bean halfway workable, which is better than the UI Sony and ATT forced upon X10 users. While the stock ROM was fast enough (in some instances not so much...the "live" updates of messages and calls on the home screen), it was regularly a PITA to actually do what you needed to. Her phone never saw an update past point releases, and she's been so spurned by the experience that she's set for an iPhone next.

    On my own end, I've had a 4 for a few years now and not a single OS update has made me regret it - 7 is relatively responsive on the old hardware, better than I expected anyways. If you can get a few good years of support and upgrades out of one phone, that's pretty good in my book. I'm going to continue to use it as long as it's supported by new iOS updates and as long as it isn't crippled by what comes out next.

  138. Re:yawn by exomondo · · Score: 1

    Apple is choosing what version of iOS I can and can't use on a device that *I OWN*.

    To a degree, yes they do, but if you don't want to update then don't update. They push a compromise between performance, features and security and if you don't want that yet were still stupid enough to buy into that system then you're just a fool, you should have chosen an Android or perhaps an OpenMoko handset. This is how they operate, nobody forces you to use them so if you don't like it then use something else.

  139. Revalent? by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    On what device?

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  140. Re:yawn by Xyde · · Score: 1

    They used to have the blur effect in the earlier betas and I didn't find it noticeably slow. It was disabled on my iPad 2 from beta 5 onward.

  141. Stop upgrading. by koan · · Score: 1

    Just stop.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  142. Re:yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    If nobody complains and remains quiet, nothing will ever change. I'm glad I do not subscribe to such a pathetic way of life.

  143. Re: yawn by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

    No, you cannot chose any ipsw. After choosing the firmware it has to check with apple's servers before proceeding. Ergo, Apple has blocked me from using any firmware besides what they think I should use.

    The irony of *YOU* calling others 'retard' is quite delicious.

  144. Re:yawn by terjeber · · Score: 1

    Not since the original release of Vista. Since Vista SP1 Windows has steadily improved in performance, running faster with less hardware requirements. Windows 8, for example, is about 20% faster and leaner than Windows 7.

  145. New version == higher hardware requirements by terjeber · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily true. Windows Vista (no SP) was the top of Windows hardware requirements. Windows Vista SP1 and onwards, Windows HW requirements has dropped and speed has increased. Windows 7 was significantly faster and more HW efficient than Vista. Windows 8 generally utperforms Windows XP on the same hardware if you have a reasonably recent graphics card (even when the grapics system is not dedicated).

  146. Device Tracker for iPhone & iPad. by mustafawi · · Score: 1

    Device Tracker for iPhone & iPad ( Track and Locate your device on the Web ) By Irfan Farooqi Some Uses: bit dot ly/DTIITW Description **** PRICE REDUCED BY 25% FOR A LIMITED TIME**** A real GPS tracker for your iPhone or iPad. Using this app you can track your iPhone or iPad anytime and anywhere from the web Keep a track of your device's location history and check it on the web anytime! If the phone is lost you can track it. If it is out of battery or turned off, you will still have its last known location before the phone lost power. https://itunes.apple.com/pk/app/device-tracker-for-iphone/id499696486?mt=8

  147. Re:yawn by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    I dunno. Can't get faster than instant. Which is why I'm glad I can turn off so much of the useless animations in Android.

    Too bad you can't turn off the general lag, e.g. http://venturebeat.com/2013/09/19/apples-iphone-5-touchscreen-is-2-5-times-faster-than-android-devices/

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  148. Re:yawn by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    What part is forced? iPhones won’t install OS updates unless you hit the button to confirm. They’ll nag you, but never force you.

  149. Yes, it's very slow by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to upgrade my Ipad 1, and it's so slow it doesn't even say it's available yet!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  150. iPad3 yes, iPhone5 not so much by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that the keyboard comes up on my iPad3 kind of jerky and there is a delay before I can start typing. It is no longer "instant"

    Not so much on my iPhone5. There are a few things that pause - I've had a few time where I double pressed a button because it was slow to respond (so slow that I thought I missed the button). But for the most part everything works fine.

    Generally yes, it is no longer "instant" - almost as if something is running in the background.

    I also don't like the animations of the icons dropping in from above. Looks nice - but I need to wait for it to finish before I can use the device.

    Also - what's up with the delay when pushing the power button? The screen now slowly gets brighter...which I need to wait for that too. The "getting darker" transition when locking the device is okay. But when I press On, I mean On...stupid dragon.

    Overall I do like iOS7. Just a few minor kinks to work out.

  151. IOS 7 slowness by rcossebo · · Score: 1

    I haven't noticed any slowness with my two devices. I'm waiting for my iPhone 5s since the OS was written for that specific phone. Ron

  152. iOS Upgrade by paultscott · · Score: 1

    The iOS upgrade was fine on the iPhone 5 and even on the iPad 3. The performance feels just fine to me. I have been running it since June and now going back to the older version really makes the phone feel old. The new features are well worth the upgrade. Not to mention the extra security from Apple encouraging the use of PIN's and now a phone can't be reactivated without the iCloud ID if it is wiped making an aftermarket for stolen phones far less desirable if people use them. The big benefits are going to come in the future as more apps start going 64 bit and the older phones and iPads are phased out in favor of 64 bit devices. Over all it is a good upgrade in my opinion. The Control Center (swipe up from the bottom) the Today feature (swipe down from top) quick access to search from any screen (swipe down on the middle of the screen) are all worth while. Mail now allows you to have a mailbox of just unread messages. (In Mailboxes tap edit and choose Unread Folder). The added security will eventually benefit us all. Auto Update of apps so users don't have to worry about keeping apps up to date anymore. All I think are worth the upgrade. The visual changes are a little jarring at first but once users get used to them it will fade away and some day we will wonder what the fuss was all about.

  153. For me, faster by Jim_Austin · · Score: 1

    My immediate impression, on my 4S, was that it was much snappier. Also, my voice quality went from unacceptable to great. I realize that's almost certainly a coincidence--something happened on my network at the same time, or something--but that was my experience. As for speed though, no question: My iPhone 4S got faster. Jim

    --
    Editor, Science Careers
  154. Re:yawn by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    You have to admire apple for their ingenuity. What better way to force people to ditch that old phone than to update the OS, make it more resource hungry...

    That's been going on for as long as there has been a computer industry.

    Not at all! You could always keep your old OS in your computer. The "great innovation" of apple is to FORCE YOU TO UPGRADE if you need to reinstall the OS, whether you like it or not....

    That's quite true, but even in the "olden" days, it was hard to downgrade because within about a year, most of your apps would have no longer been compatible, or the OS would no longer run the latest must-have apps or games.

  155. No. I have experimental evidence by Optali · · Score: 1

    I dropped my iPad a few days ago and it fell at exactly 9,8m/s^2
    I did it again after upgrading to iOS7 and same result.

    Serioulsy: I don't see it being slow (iPad 3, 32GB) And yes, the above is true, the damn thing drops to the ground every few days, all the corners are completely dented.
    But... as it was gift from my ex-employer I don't give a fuck ;)

    Bwahaaaa, Apple fanboys shiver, I'm torturing and abusing one of your holy devices...

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  156. No problems here yet by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    I downloaded the update on my iPhone 5 today. Took roughly 6 minutes start to using it again.

    Initial impressions are that rather than being slower, it is faster.

    Some people reported the devices hanging when inputting their pin. Did not have that either.

    It turned bluetooth on. Did not want that.

    I really preferred the old icons. Hoping there is an app to restore them.

    Battery life so far is the same.

    Have not tried all the new features, so my report is not comprehensive

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  157. Re:IOS 7 on an iPhone 4S by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Of course, we may just be incompetent at finding such things in iOS land. But that describes much of the Apple fanboy crowd, really, so some good advice sites could contribute a lot to users' happiness levels.

    Heree is the list of the problems in iOS7.

    300 Apple Fanbois were killed, when their iPhones blew up, spewing white hot acid all over them.

    Another 1000 have been permantly blinded, because the nre OS drains the batteries so quickly that they also explode.

    The gold coloring in the iphoines is carcinogenic, causeing rapid death. Apple has tried to cover up this, but it turns out that the entire team making the gold phones is dead. That's why there is a shortage of the gold phones. This is what really killed Steve Jobs.

    The iphone screen now emits hard gamma rays

    Farmers report that their milch cows have run dry.

    The email automatically emails threats to officials, anlong with your GPS coordinates.

    Use an iOS7 powered iPhone once, and you will be both sterile and impotent for life. However, women grow penises

    A study found that not one of the new features worked, and all the old ones were automatically disabled.

    Do yourself a favor - buy a droid phone. Men report an average penis growth of 4 inches, the phones emit a pheronome that women find irresistable, (make sure you get the right one)

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  158. Re:yawn by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Who is forcing? My iPhone 5 is still working just fine on iOS 6. I upgraded the iPad Mini and it's working just fine, but I'm not ready to mess with the phone, got too much stuff on there to just run out and upgrade to the latest and greatest before it's been properly tested by 200 million beta testers [businessinsider.com].

    I'll wait for 7.1, then wait two weeks after that.

    I admire Android users fearlessness though, to run an OS that freely gives complete control over everything to any app or website. I have no idea how Android users sleep at night, knowing their Android phone can be remotely wiped and reset to factory settings simply by visiting a website.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  159. Re:yawn by exomondo · · Score: 1

    If nobody complains and remains quiet, nothing will ever change.

    Why would you complain about it?

  160. Still on 6 though the new OS is downloaded; Nexus4 by movdqa · · Score: 1

    I have the download ready and waiting to install but I was looking for threads and articles like this one before deciding on upgrading (I have an iPhone 5 which runs perfectly fine as it is). I am planning on upgrading soon but want to hear about any problems that users are running into. It seems like some are very happy, some not so happy and those in-between. I figure that any show-stoppers will turn up this week. My son had to buy a phone two months ago (his feature phone died). I suggested the Nexus 4, HTC-1 (Google edition), and S4 (Google Edition). I recommended the Nexus 4 as he's picking up the tab (it's nice when your kids graduate with a CS degree so that they can get a job and pay for their own toys) and that's what he chose and he loves it. He used to carry around a feature phone and an iPod Touch for music and pictures. Now he just has one device with a very good camera, screen, battery life and he doesn't have to keep multiple cables around to charge multiple devices. My wife's feature phone is going too and I'm planning on getting her a Nexus 5 when it comes out. I like the file-level stuff that you can do on Android but I prefer the Apps on iOS. So I have an iPhone and a Nexus 7 - I can do what I want between the two of them.

  161. Re:yawn by rambilly · · Score: 1

    Android is in fact worse - the tablet I bought my son in Christmas 2011 never received any updates at all... Just didn't get them - not a hardware issue in the least. Just part of the fragmented and security weak Android ecosystem that doesn't seem to bother Google...

    --
    ACM3
  162. Re:yawn by rambilly · · Score: 1

    While I haven't tried this on my old iPhone 4, the improvements in iOS7 include not only more and better gestures but the system is far speedier throughout on my iPhone 5. I do believe there may be some errata that need to be fixed on older devices that are causing some performance issues. Upgrade was flawless and wireless. All I really hear from people in conclusion is "I can't deal with change" - find something else to do with your time please. Adapt or die.

    --
    ACM3
  163. Re:stereotypical iPhone user by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    LOL, are you really so brainwashed that in your mind an unflashy GUI == communism? Or are you just butthurt that I'm mocking your precious free market religion?

  164. Re:yawn by persicom · · Score: 1

    Have you managed to upgrade the OS on that phone? Of does it have exactly the same features now that it had back then?