Slashdot Mirror


Apple Blocks Lawrence Lessig's Comment On iOS 7 Wi-Fi Glitch

destinyland writes "A glitch in iOS7 has cost "a significant number" of Apple users their Wi-Fi access, according to ZDNet. But they also report that Apple is now censoring posts in their "Apple Support Communities" forums where users suggest possible responses to their loss of WiFi capabilities (including exercising their product warranty en masse). "We understand the desire to share experiences in your topic, 'Re: wifi greyed out after update to ios7,'" read one warning sent to Lawrence Lessig, "but because these posts are not allowed on our forums, we have removed it." Lessig — who co-founded Creative Commons (and was a board member of the Free Software Foundation) has been documenting the ongoing "comments slaughter" on his Twitter feed, drawing attention to what he says is the Borg-like behavior of Apple as a corporation. Lessig "is now part of an angry mob in Apple's forums who upgraded to iOS 7 and lost Wi-Fi connectivity," ZDNet notes, adding that as of this morning their reporter has been unable to obtain an official response from Apple."

326 comments

  1. Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Walled garden is walled.
    What did you expect?

    (EVE Online oblig: Damage Control II works in PvP!!11one)

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Hmm by h3st · · Score: 0
      and he knows it:

      I upgraded my iPhone (“what, you have an iPhone” — ok, you win, sin #1)

      --
      hei katter
    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I remember when, i think it was osx.4ish, some macs wouldn't join a wpa network unless the key was a certain side or subselection of letter-numbers. something wierd like that.

      apply pretended it wasn't true, removed all the comments in thier forums asking how to fix it or if a patch was coming.

      that went on for like a year. they never acknowleged a problem.

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple Support Forums have been 'groomed' for many years before iOS.

    4. Re:Hmm by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For him, it ought to be sin #1 through infinity. It's almost as bad as if RMS switched to Windows or something.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Hmm by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Now lights out.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walled garden is walled. What did you expect?

      And now we're noticing the walled garden has guard towers.

    7. Re:Hmm by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I expect the device to work as advertised. Walled garden is irrelevant in this context.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Walled Garden is relevant because it applies to their forums as well. OK, walled ecosystem, does that sound better? It's still shit, but hey, it's melodic shit now :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:Hmm by boporus · · Score: 1

      All gardens are walled. That's why they remain gardens - so they can be maintained, controlled, kept safe. Else they become a jungle.

  2. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You must be new here; most of the time the news slams Microsoft and praises Apple.

  3. Pretty common support forums policies by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple is really strict about not letting people give out certain kinds of technical advice or speculation on their support forums, on the not-unreasonable basis that things posted there have Apple's tacit approval. When I hung out on Nokia's support boards it was similar.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...on the other hand, the Warranty information page would seem to be exactly the sort of thing Apple should not be deleting.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by crmarvin42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you sure that is what they were objecting to? Honest question, BTW.

      I've been having wifi issues since upgrading to iOS7, but only intermitently. I could not connect to wifi at all for the first 2 days, but now it connects most of the time. About once a week I have to power the phone off and on to get wifi working again. I saw a thread on the discussion pages during my first 2 day outage (maybe the same one, maybe not) that was telling everyone your wifi chip had physically been damaged by the update and to go to the Applestore for a new phone. Presumably my wifi chip hasn't been physically damaged because it works the vast majority of the time, and if they are telling everyone something that is demonstrably false (in Apple's opinion anyway), the I could see why Apple might intervene.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      User error? Use the warranty!

      Software bug? Use the warranty!

      Scratched display? Use the warranty!

      Just don't like it any more? Use the warranty!

      If you have any problem whatsoever, use the warranty! Now you have two problems.

      Honestly, I just can't get worked up about this justified censorship. Until Apple releases some kind of official solution (which might very well be "send it in for repair"), giving out wrong solutions just increases the amount of trouble involved. Having managed a help desk before, I've seen how often we had to waste time undoing users' community-given fixes for problems, like adding RAM to remove a virus (thanks, Geek Squad!). By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like Tienanmen Square, Apple keeps a tight ship.

    5. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

      I could not connect to wifi at all for the first 2 days, but now it connects most of the time.

      The vacuum tubes Apple uses for their wifi radios are known to take a while to warm up. You should have fewer (or no) problems from now on.

      .

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re: Pretty common support forums policies by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Mod parent up

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    7. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So instead people will take to google and insert whatever random wifi fix comes along rather than peer support that apple could at least moderate... brilliant.

    8. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      If I'd spent the best part of $1,000 on a phone and the wi-fi stopped wroking, the last thing I'd care about is the manufacturer's operational costs.

      Perhaps if enough people send their phones back, they might not release an operating system that breaks peoples' phones next time.

    9. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      users posting on a support forum are NOT speaking for apple!

      censorship is censorship, that's all there is to be said about this.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by kommakazi · · Score: 0

      This. Mod parent up.

    11. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that is what they were objecting to? Honest question, BTW.

      No. That is the thing with that kind of censored forums.
      Apple could remove the post and claim that it was removed because it broke their forum rules against racism and child pornography. Without the original comment left intact there is no way for anyone else to know if the comment just contained legal advice for scammed users.

    12. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      punish the vendor so that the vendor hurts.

      pain is a GREAT motivator.

      its a valid way to 'fix' a problem. if that's what it takes to get apple to improve their quality, so be it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    13. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by jythie · · Score: 2

      From what I gather it was not the Warranty page, but information about how local laws could be used for a refund. While it is something consumers should know (unless it is a shady use of the law, I do not know the details), I can not blame Apple for not wanting to spread such information in their own forum.

    14. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I got 99 problems, but iOS ain't one.

    15. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      waste time undoing users' community-given fixes for problems, like adding RAM to remove a virus

      Did it help when you made them remove the added RAM?

      Great example, man.

    16. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not at all surprised that Apple or Nokia behave this way. But, my goodness, Lessig was on the FSF board and now he's using an Apple phone?

      His comments would not be deleted from a Replicant mailing list or a xda-developers - they'd be dealt with by engineers (at least acknowledged/triaged). If that's the kind of experience he wants, he's using the wrong phone.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    17. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by RedBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      User error? Use the warranty!

      Software bug? Use the warranty!

      Scratched display? Use the warranty!

      Just don't like it any more? Use the warranty!

      If you have any problem whatsoever, use the warranty! Now you have two problems.

      Honestly, I just can't get worked up about this justified censorship. Until Apple releases some kind of official solution (which might very well be "send it in for repair"), giving out wrong solutions just increases the amount of trouble involved. Having managed a help desk before, I've seen how often we had to waste time undoing users' community-given fixes for problems, like adding RAM to remove a virus (thanks, Geek Squad!). By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      I have been a satisfied Apple user for over a decade now, but I came in here to say that Apple's discussion forum censorship is for reals one of the worst things about the company. But then I read a few posts like yours. Your post is a prime example of why I keep coming back to Slashdot despite the dupes and terrible editing and clickbait content. Instead of having my biases reinforced, I often have my mind expanded and my thoughts provoked by reading interesting alternative viewpoints here.

      Thanks, man. *brofist*

    18. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      No, the reasonable assumption is that the forums are there for users to post, and so the content there does not represent apple's position unless the poster is an apple employee authorized to speak on behalf of apple.

    19. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      I looked up the links in the article, and it seems he had bought the 4s second hand so he doesn't have warranty. It worked before the OS update though.

    20. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by epyT-R · · Score: 0

      No one said those uses you listed were valid (unless the warranty states otherwise). Faulty equipment is a valid reason. Censorship is never justified. A simple reply to the comment from an authorized apple employee that actually addresses the issue logically is all that's required. Deleting posts just makes people think apple is at fault and prevents resolution.

    21. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      If I'd spent the best part of $1,000 on a phone and the wi-fi stopped wroking, the last thing I'd care about is the manufacturer's operational costs.

      Perhaps if enough people send their phones back, they might not release an operating system that breaks peoples' phones next time.

      Hey, think of Apple, they are hardly scraping by. They need your $1,000 without operational costs attached.

    22. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by tippe · · Score: 2

      Keeping the wrong solution posted just to avoid people seeking out other wrong solutions elsewhere (which they could and probably will do anyway), isn't a solution.

    23. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two users who modded this 'Troll' should been banned from moderating.

    24. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Censorship is never justified"

      Give me your personal information. All of it. Demographics man! I want 'em! Address, SSN, phone numbers, email addresses, sexual preferences (even the latent ones), significant others sexual preferences (maybe she's hot and looking for a good time!). Oh, all that information just slipped out when someone stole your identity? Meh. No censorship here! If it's posted, it stays! No matter what the fallout might be.

    25. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not everyone is reasonable. People go to the forums looking for answers and guidance. If someone with apparent authority tells you all your problems will be solved if you stand on your head and piss into your own mouth Apple should remove that. There will be people out there trying to overflow their pie holes with piss. The least of the least common denominator.

      I know it's a grey area, who decides what stays vs. who decides what goes, but there has to be some limits. And the forum belongs to Apple so it's up to them. Unless they have some sort of user moderated forum where such bollox could be removed by vote.

    26. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And there's no need for anyone else to know. It's Apple's own website, and they are free to execute their own rules as they see fit. It's not as if it's the only web site on the internet discussing Apple topics.

      Likewise if you or I set up a forum, we would be able to moderate it as we see fit.

    27. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually it might not be a million miles from the truth. Apple silently change wifi hardware during each model's lifetime, just like every other phone manufacturer. Maybe the firmware includes with iOS7 isn't so good on the old Rev A chips, but if you get your phone exchanged for a Rev B one it will be better.

      The real problem is a lack of real information so people can only guess. It's hard for manufacturers to deal with this kind of situation because they don't want to say anything until they are sure.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That certainly didn't work when Sony FUBAR'd 10's of thousands of playstations with their updates over the years.

    29. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if enough people send their phones back, they might not release an operating system that breaks peoples' phones next time.

      It's doubtful, but perhaps. Nevertheless, Apple have no obligation to allow the organisation of such mainly wasteful actions on it's own forums.

    30. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Censorship is the wrong reaction. It gives the appearance that there is a problem and they are trying to cover it up. The correct response is to make an official statement to the effect that the problem is acknowledge and a warranty replacement is not necessary at this stage. They can pass this message on to their stuff staff at their stores too.

      Censorship is always fail. Communication is always the appropriate response.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The internet has come to expect companies to display criticism and things that are generally detrimental to themselves on their web sites. Amazon is the leader in this area, often having overwhelmingly negative reviews of products displayed as the "most helpful". It gives customers confidence that they are not being bullshitted or ripped off, and that if there really were any major flaws in a product people would have publicised them.

      Aside from anything else you can't cover this sort of thing up any more. You might as well publish it so that you can respond and manage the situation, because otherwise it will appear on every other news website beyond your control anyway, and look far worse because you tried to censor it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Censorship is never justified

      spam?

    33. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by quacking+duck · · Score: 0

      By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      If I'd spent the best part of $1,000 on a phone and the wi-fi stopped wroking, the last thing I'd care about is the manufacturer's operational costs.

      Perhaps if enough people send their phones back, they might not release an operating system that breaks peoples' phones next time.

      Though your point is valid, it is undermined by your misrepresenting the phone's price. The number of people who actually spent $850 on an iPhone (i.e. 64 GB *and* unlocked) is a small minority. Most who buy the latest generation, will be the $200 16 GB on contract ($650 contract-free).

      If you insist that this is the "true cost" of the phone whether they bought it on contract or not, then I'd better see you using the same standard for the competition, e.g. the $610 Nokia Lumia 1020, the $640 Samsung's Galaxy S4, and the $725 Galaxy Note III.

    34. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf ever! all they have to say is that unless they publish it it's not official and if you follow other people's advice and burn your shit up you may void your crapple warranty. then they can screw everyone twice instead of just once!

    35. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately the people who buy slaveware like this are the same ones who treat the internet like it's a tv with a few "real" channels.

    36. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by sg3000 · · Score: 2

      Apple is really strict about not letting people give out certain kinds of technical advice or speculation on their support forums, on the not-unreasonable basis that things posted there have Apple's tacit approval.

      No kidding. I don't think the submission helps by being vague about what was being posted:

      Apple is now censoring posts in their "Apple Support Communities" forums where users suggest possible responses to their loss of WiFi capabilities

      Possible response? I wasn't sure what that meant, so I read Lessig's blog to get an idea of sort of "possible responses" Apple was cruelly censoring. If his post is any indication of what he posted on his forum, no one should be surprised the Apple deleted it:

      I skipped all the drastic steps others seem to have taken such as putting in freezer or the one where I guy heats his wifi chip up to 300degrees which by the way seem to have worked quite well.

      Heating up the WiFi chip to 300 degrees? And it worked "quite well??" No surprise at all that Apple deleted this kind of "advice" from their official support forums. Reading a suggestion like that on Lessig's blog is one thing, but when it's posted on Apple's official support forum, someone is bound to assume wrongly that Apple is approving the suggestion. No wonder that Apple deleted it. I imagine Apple will also be deleting posts that suggest to users that they boil their iPhones or microwave them because the method seemed to "work quite well."

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    37. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      While this is clearly true, the people you moderate would be free to describe how that makes them feel in any way they see fit, as well.

      In turn you're free to ignore them, respond to them, or do whatever floats your boat.

      You're even free to try to shush them through appeals to authority.

    38. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by BobMcD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Subsidies are still costs. Someone has to pay it. If you don't know who is paying it, chances are it's you.

    39. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Holi · · Score: 1

      650 is still the better part of 1000, Not sure where you pulled 850 from.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    40. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship is never justified

      spam?

      Back in the days of dial-up when the only real form of email was using a client to pull mail from a server to the local machine, and your storage capacity was measured in kilo not mega or terra, there was a good reason for trying to eliminate spam: it would literally overflow your mailbox, consume all your bandwidth, etc.
      These days those concerns are largely moot. I run my email without server-side spam filters, and rely on client-side processing, and haven't had a single problem with handling the volume at all.

      So yes, in my opinion censoring spam is not justified. Especially since the definition of "spam" has changed from "Flood of meaningless emails" to "anything I don't personally feel like seeing".

    41. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Holi · · Score: 1

      How many forums or comment sections are completely ruined by spam?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    42. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that those other phones "just work".

    43. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by X.25 · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I just can't get worked up about this justified censorship. Until Apple releases some kind of official solution (which might very well be "send it in for repair"), giving out wrong solutions just increases the amount of trouble involved. Having managed a help desk before, I've seen how often we had to waste time undoing users' community-given fixes for problems, like adding RAM to remove a virus (thanks, Geek Squad!). By resorting to the warranty's options, Apple's operational cost rises, and the user still doesn't have wi-fi on their phone.

      So, how long do you think people should wait for Apple to give "some kind of official solution"?

      A day? Week? Month? Year?

      I mean, I can't see why people would be upset that device which they paid hundreds of dollars for does not work and they also have no idea how long before they would be given "some kind of official solution".

      It is just natural to wait for weeks/months in such situations, isn't it?

    44. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This. What did Lessig actually say in his post? If it was part of a thread saying that the software update had physically damaged the hardware, I can see why Apple would delete a thread full of erroneous advice or outright misinformation.

      It looks like he reposted another user's comment that encouraged users to take their phones back to their place of purchase and demand a new iPhone in exchange. It also looks like most people with this wifi glitch are suffering from incomplete installations of iOS7 that can be remedied simply by backing up the iPhone, restoring the iPhone software from a clean image (i.e. "factory reset"), and then restoring the backup data to the phone. My guess is that Apple would rather people do the latter, which actually solves a software issue, than the former, which is wasteful not only in terms of iPhone hardware but time, since it's faster to restore phone than return it to a store and deal with clerks.

      The purpose of a "mass-warranty-claim" isn't to "solve the problem," it's to discourage Apple from shipping shite code in the future, and maybe do a little QA in the future...

      --
      Who did what now?
    45. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "my wifi chip hasn't been physically damaged because it works the vast majority of the time"
      so it doesn't work reliably. How d you know it's not an issue with the chip?
      Chips are complex, there are numerous things that could happen to a chip to cause intermittent problems.
      And with the board. Maybe A cap is leaking when a certain current is applies, or heat? I could go on and on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Censorship is never justified. "
      yes it is, don't be stupid.

      If he is spotting information that actually hurts other readers would be one example.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    47. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Moot? hardly. over 75% of bandwidth is Spam. That mean more expensive and less bandwidth for people not spamming.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    48. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "... that's all there is to be said about this."
      so we agree, censorship is ok.

      OR maybe you had more to say about it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    49. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Since when do we consider partially installed applications "shite code". All software, except some viruses, breaks when only parts of the executable are installed.

    50. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by aslagle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously, this is anecdotal, but when my wife upgraded, she had the greyed-out WiFi setting.

      I restored her phone from scratch, and it didn't fix it.

      We then took her phone to the Apple store, and the tech (I refuse to call them geniuses) said the hardware had failed. Thankfully, she was 8 days (?!!) away from warranty expiration, so she got a shiny new 4S.

      I understand that iOS7 did a firmware upgrade, and that can stress the hardware - but no errors appeared during the upgrade process. You'd think an incomplete flash would at least kick out something.

    51. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      Since when do we consider partially installed applications "shite code". All software, except some viruses, breaks when only parts of the executable are installed.

      Normally we wouldn't. But that's not the "shite code" I refer to, but to the installer that clearly isn't ready-for-primetime if it is failing the same way on many hundreds of thousands (or millions) of phones the same exact way... and if the installer puts so much stress on the hardware that it is permanently broken (check down the thread a bit) that's a problem, too.

      --
      Who did what now?
    52. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's worth it though. Streaming audio just feels so much "warmer" than the harsh sound from transistor-based transceivers. The soundstage feels much more natural, and I can distinguish characteristics of the music that just aren't there on other devices. The tubes recreate the missing detail from lossy encoding, and I can hear the faint heartbeat of the musician, and even perceive what kind of mood the musicians were in during the recording. (Spoiler alert: The Lumineers are actually seething with rage in "Ho Hey.") If you place an earbud into a nostril instead, you can literally smell the aromas present in the studio, like the haze of Jamaican Gold during No Woman No Cry, or the remnants of Ringo's bio break wafting after him as he sneaks back into the studio on Hey Jude. Really powerful stuff. This works for highly compressed video too. If I watch a video of some Mario Bros. gameplay on YouTube, I can see the individual hairs in Mario's 'stache, or the wet spot on the ground after the Goomba's guts get squished out.

      Pro tip: to double the detail, use 5 GHz instead of 2.4 GHz.

    53. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It's the users fault, they updated it wrong.

    54. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I don't get your point about "true cost" and comparisons.

      I'd be pretty pissed if I forked out a bunch for the Galaxy Note III and a vendor update stopped the wifi. If they didn't fix it ASAP, then yes I would return it under warranty since a phone without wifi is crap.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    55. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying that you should care about Apple's costs, but Apple probably does, so they have no reason to allow posts encouraging unnecessary warranty claims. You would likely care that you're going through extra hassle when an official solution will likely be released soon. It was broken by software, so it can probably be fixed by software.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    56. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Heh, good catch.

      The incident I was thinking of while writing the first half of that sentence involved a registry hack that disabled a Windows feature without changing the UI to show it was disabled. The user then later came to my team because that feature just wasn't working right any more.

      That broke up the narrative, though, so I chose a shorter example to finish with, and didn't notice the implication.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    57. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Subsidies are still costs. Someone has to pay it. If you don't know who is paying it, chances are it's you.

      And probably with interest. :)

    58. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, vacuum tubes are making a comeback as micro electronics.
      vacuum switching is faster than semiconductor switching. Interestingly the micro vacuum 'tubes' switches are so small that surrounding air is effectively a vacuum, so you don't actually have to remove air to make it work.

    59. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but information about how local laws could be used for a refund"

      " I can not blame Apple for not wanting to spread such information in their own forum."

          Isn't that the part of Apples' responsibility as a public company? What's being spread is legal and government encouraged information for the benefit of the public. When Apple was completely private they can act like brats but under public support, not so much. If they want to act this way, give back all the investor money and go private, otherwise tough it out. This is one of the reasons I'll never have an Apple device and this particular reason doesn't just apply to Apple.

    60. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes, it should have checksummed and never allowed it to be installed.

    61. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I'd agree. If you meant the installer that's reasonable. I'm not sure I'd call it shite code, and not just code that doesn't handle a use case that Apple hadn't encountered before. So I still think the proper response is a support call.

    62. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by epine · · Score: 1, Insightful

      encouraging unnecessary warranty claims

      From the user's perspective the warranty claim is necessary until Apple communicates to the afflicted that it isn't, because they've solved the problem, the fix is available now, and it won't cost you two hours of your life to patch up Apple's incompetence.

      How To Irritate People - The Car Salesman

    63. Re: Pretty common support forums policies by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure, that's why I indicated it was a presumption. In my experience hardware issues tend to fail more often than once a week. Could be hardware though. I'm taking a wait and see approach for now.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    64. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by dakohli · · Score: 1

      The real problem is a lack of real information so people can only guess. It's hard for manufacturers to deal with this kind of situation because they don't want to say anything until they are sure.

      Hammer, meet Nail!

      This is the issue exactly! Apple is not the only company that likes to hold information closely. I once had an ISP that would pretend that they did not have outages, and liked to blame their customers. I spent several hours trying to debug my girlfriend's network connection only to find out that they had a 6 hour outage that they only admitted to after the fact.

    65. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      My comment came from a misunderstanding of the phrase "the better part of" (or even "the best part of" which is what 0123456 wrote).

      Apparently it means "over half of" instead of "a significant majority of." It doesn't make sense to me, since that means even $501 is the better part of $1000.

    66. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You admitted to changing Your Mind on the internet. *brofist*

    67. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make sense to me, since that means even $501 is the better part of $1000.

      It makes perfect sense - $501 is the better part of $1000.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    68. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you do with that added RAM actually?

    69. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The deleted post was referring to UK law, which states that the seller has a "reasonable period of time" to fix any warranty issues. For most general electronics that is taken to mean up to 28 days by courts, but there are clear exceptions when a device is essential. For example if your car broke down under warranty the period would only be considered 28 days if the seller provided a courtesy car after the first few days, otherwise you would be heavily out of pocket on rental/public transport fees. For a phone that you have on contract and are reliant on for communications or business you could definitely argue much less than 28 days unless a suitable loaner phone was provided.

      So in this instance taking the phone to Apple for a warranty claim is probably the best thing to do. They will be obliged to fix it quickly and make sure you are not out of pocket or too badly inconvenienced while prepare a software fix. After 28 days you could demand a refund if the fix was not forthcoming.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    70. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by balbus000 · · Score: 0

      And the $249 Nexus 4.
      (Yes, it's almost a year old now, and was $349 when it first came out.)

    71. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      How the heck do you spend the better part of $1K on an iPhone? I just bought a nice shiny 64G 5S, with case and connection adapter, and it was well below $500.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    72. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      punish the vendor so that the vendor hurts.

      pain is a GREAT motivator.

      its a valid way to 'fix' a problem. if that's what it takes to get apple to improve their quality, so be it.

      I can't help but think this isn't a good thing for the cellular providers. Possibly makes you wonder.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    73. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The difference is that those other phones "just work".

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/22/nexus_users_cursed_by_latest_upgrade/

      The latest tweak to Android is fitting badly onto Google's own hardware, with the Nexus 4 reportedly fudging Wi-Fi, crashing out and refusing to run previously compatible applications.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    74. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The internet has come to expect companies to display criticism and things that are generally detrimental to themselves on their web sites. Amazon is the leader in this area, often having overwhelmingly negative reviews of products displayed as the "most helpful".

      Sure.Too bad that Amazon often deletes "most helpful" negative comments when it pleases them, often en masse. Like against Dianetics.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    75. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats some pretty fine apologizin'. However, perhaps there is a way to find out what a warranty really _is_ for, oh maybe i't in the DEFINITION FOR THE WORD WARRANTY. You see, when a warranty is granted for a product it offers the customer a way to have the product repaired/replaced when it gets broken. If the customer did something specific to break it (drop it, hack it etc) then there are clever little phrases in the warranty to remove said coverages. However when the producer of the product does something (at manufacture or at any later date) to make the product not work, you bet your fucking ass it is a warranty case.

      Now shutthefuckup and get back to your helpdesk.

    76. Re:Pretty common support forums policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'physically damaged'

  4. Well the thing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first post has been removed by Apple

  5. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fortunately I can't read it, becuase my iPhone lost wi-fi access.

  6. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Antipater · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't care about Apple one way or the other. But stories like this keep me informed that I should continue hitting "Not Now" when my iPad bugs me to upgrade to iOS7, and that matters to me. So no, not bored.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  7. How is that Lawrence Lessig uses IOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    1. Re:How is that Lawrence Lessig uses IOS? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like most people, he uses it via touch screen.

    2. Re:How is that Lawrence Lessig uses IOS? by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      Today he revealed he had been using Keynote for presentations. It feels to me like he is pandering do a different public now.

    3. Re:How is that Lawrence Lessig uses IOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does kind of take the cake from the "People Who Ought to Know Better" department. It's kind of like finding out that Bruce Schneier runs Microsoft Windows (and he does, really, though at least Schneier also knows better than to use it on a network).

    4. Re:How is that Lawrence Lessig uses IOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! Where are my moderator points when I need them?

  8. My Update Didn't Cause Me Troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just upgraded my iPhone 4S from iOS 6 to 7, and I haven't experienced any issues with my WLAN connections. I am sure that this whole posting is about the comment censorship, but this doesn't highlight which Apple products are supposedly being disrupted.

  9. Apple forums are a wholesome place by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Apple forums are not the place to criticize Apple or its products.

    .
    I, for one, applaud Apple's efforts to keep the Apple support forums all singing praises for Apple and its products. When I visit those forums, I do not want to see critique of Apple and its products. I want my visit to be positive and cheerful.

    I am so happy that Apple is providing such a wholesome environment for me to visit and discuss Apple's products.

    1. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by war4peace · · Score: 1

      ^Funny

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

      What colour is the Kool-Aid?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      It used to be grey. Now it's all sorts of bright happy colours.

    4. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Here is the history of Apple, inc. in colours: beige, fruit colours, white, silver/black/grey, neon colours.

    5. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by ckatko · · Score: 0

      I was going to write a cheerful praise of Apple on their forums... but I just upgraded and it was greyed out.

    6. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      Don't know if being homophobic or going along with the joke.

    7. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by jythie · · Score: 1

      I am guessing the former. It does not really go along with the joke very well.

    8. Re: Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that racist means what you think it means. He didn't mention race anywhere. Homosexual isn't a race.

    9. Re: Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The green Android bot is not the real mascot. It is just a stand in because grumpy cat wouldn't show up.

      On behalf of all grumpy Android users I ask you, please go die in a fire.

    10. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hows your stock doing?

    11. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay Anon

    12. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Why would Apple even need a support forum? Having an entire forum would seem to indicate that there could be issues, or people might need help doing something. Surely a product that's as awesome as the iWhatever is perfect and such a forum would be completely unnecessary.

      Instead of being called a "support forum", how about we call it a "awesomeness forum" for people to proclaim their undying love for Apple.

    13. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Why would Apple even need a support forum?

      Maybe smug Apple fans need a place to go and blast non-believers, so they can feel superior. It's kind of like when Christians host fake atheist forums to proselytize.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    14. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny until you realize this is exactly what Apple has been striving for since ...forever? At least half of their public image is how they can be so polite, warm, and fuzzy in their customer service locations. Up until you start actually asking real questions...

    15. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It's funny until I realize I own no Apple products whatsoever. After that, it's even funnier!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    16. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you are beyond naive if you don't know Apple has for years based their marketing and primary market share on the gay and lesbian market. It's only since the release of the iPod that Apple has made any attempt at all to market their products to a mainstream audience.

      It's in their iconography:

      Rainbow colored Apple logo to match the rainbow flag of the gay movement.
      Pseudo-personified grammar typical of the gay community "Macintosh has encountered an error" (gramatically that should be "Your Macintosh" or "This Macintosh"

      I work in broadcasting, it's a gay industry, I have lots of gay friends and colleagues, nearly 100% of them use Macs and iPhones, less than 10% of my straight friends use iPhone and virtually none of them use Macs.

      If you can't see the connection, you're probably have some kind of autism or other social disorder. It used to be code, I mean you could just about be 100% sure some was LGBT if they owned a Macintosh, not so much now that their marketing has gone mainstream.

    17. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better watch out. A friend of mine recently was visiting the forums and afterwards found a full pound of oatmeal in his ass. True story.

    18. Re:Apple forums are a wholesome place by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      This post made me think immediately of this comic strip.

  10. How about iWork? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    It's funny that they'd censor the iOS7 forums given the nasty language bandied about in the iWork forums about the evisceration of the office suite. I suppose that they don't care about iWork (it certainly shows).

    1. Re: How about iWork? by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's why I find this whole story suspicious, because there's plenty of bashing of apple products going on on the forums. Why they would censor complaints of only this issue seems strange and highly unlikely

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re: How about iWork? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That's the point - they're not censoring complaints - there are plenty of those on those very boards. They remove specific things that break the posting rules (and note; criticising Apple or its products is not against the rules). One of those rules is saying something like "the iOS7 update damaged your wifi hardware, so get your phone exchanged under warranty", when no such thing is indicated right now.

      Even if that does turn out to be the eventual outcome of the bug, posting that sort of information now and unofficially on a site that Apple controls is just not going to fly.

      He's free to be critical of them all he wants, even on their own boards, but they can and will remove erroneous or premature "solutions" to bugs.

    3. Re: How about iWork? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think anyone said "the iOS7 update damaged your wifi hardware". Here's one post that got removed:

      Before I have another post removed I urge all those affected with wifi issues to exercise your rights as I have done as published on apples vet own website.

      http://www.apple.com/uk/legal/statutory-warranty/

      There are far too many of us affected for this to be a coincidence or consumer caused problem, I had a 16gb white 4s purchased in July 2013 and wifi was completely greyed out no matter what fixes I was advised to try.

      I have been successful in my claim and am now in receipt of a brand new iPhone 5, this was provided to me by the phone shop I signed my O2 contract with last year.

      Good luck and persevere

      Lessig went back to ask a question and found that the post had been deleted, so he re-posted it and that one got deleted also. It's not about spreading false information, Apple just doesn't want people to use the warranty route (for possibly a good reason, since they did end up replacing the above device and thereby possibly admitting that it's their problem).

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re: How about iWork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone said "the iOS7 update damaged your wifi hardware". Here's one post that got removed:

      Before I have another post removed I urge all those affected with wifi issues to exercise your rights as I have done as published on apples vet own website.

      http://www.apple.com/uk/legal/statutory-warranty/

      There are far too many of us affected for this to be a coincidence or consumer caused problem, I had a 16gb white 4s purchased in July 2013 and wifi was completely greyed out no matter what fixes I was advised to try.

      I have been successful in my claim and am now in receipt of a brand new iPhone 5, this was provided to me by the phone shop I signed my O2 contract with last year.

      Good luck and persevere

      Lessig went back to ask a question and found that the post had been deleted, so he re-posted it and that one got deleted also. It's not about spreading false information, Apple just doesn't want people to use the warranty route (for possibly a good reason, since they did end up replacing the above device and thereby possibly admitting that it's their problem).

      I don't think anyone said "the iOS7 update damaged your wifi hardware". Here's one post that got removed:

      Before I have another post removed I urge all those affected with wifi issues to exercise your rights as I have done as published on apples vet own website.

      http://www.apple.com/uk/legal/statutory-warranty/

      There are far too many of us affected for this to be a coincidence or consumer caused problem, I had a 16gb white 4s purchased in July 2013 and wifi was completely greyed out no matter what fixes I was advised to try.

      I have been successful in my claim and am now in receipt of a brand new iPhone 5, this was provided to me by the phone shop I signed my O2 contract with last year.

      Good luck and persevere

      Lessig went back to ask a question and found that the post had been deleted, so he re-posted it and that one got deleted also. It's not about spreading false information, Apple just doesn't want people to use the warranty route (for possibly a good reason, since they did end up replacing the above device and thereby possibly admitting that it's their problem).

      This was me, few typos in there

      1)4s bought July 2012 not 2013
      2) the reason I got a 5 as a replacement was because the phone shop said there was no point replacing with a 4s as the Chances are it would happen again

      I have had a number of posts removed and the lat email from apple staff said if I continued they would report me to my ISP.

      There are other reports of handsets being replaced outside warranty and others are not, some consistency would be good

  11. Pardon me, but... by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1, Troll

    If you buy an iPhone, you have already given up most of your freedoms (regarding your phone), so what's the point bitching about it afterwards.

    Please mod this "+1 Insightful Troll" -- oh wait, this category doesn't exist. :O

    1. Re:Pardon me, but... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have to agree. We're deploying iPhones to replace Blackberries and the number of hoops I had to jump through just to create Appled ID accounts for corporate use was mindnumbing. Not to mention the constant pestering with every update.

      Yes, Enable Location Services. No, don't use iCloud. No, I don't want to answer security questions. I told you this when I set up the phone the first time, and every time I've updated. Why do you keep asking me?

      Not to mention the joke with ID accounts themselves. You set one up then, when you go to load your first app, you're told you have to review/update your information so you can sign into iTunes! WTF?! I don't want to sign into iTunes. I want to install a free, non-Apple app.

      There is no way I can recommend an iPhone to anyone. Sure, they look cool and work (mostly), but the nagging and Big Brother nonsense just doesn't make them worth the effort.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Pardon me, but... by Krojack · · Score: 2

      There is no way I can recommend an iPhone to anyone. Sure, they look cool and work (mostly), but the nagging and Big Brother nonsense just doesn't make them worth the effort.

      Exactly why I won't ever buy another one or recommend them. You hand over lots of $$, they hand you a device and say, "Have fun with 'our' device and remember, you can only do what we allow you do with it. If we don't approve of it then you can't do it."

      In other words, you never own the device. Apple isn't big brother, Apple is mommy and daddy that have your, er I mean their device locked down.

    3. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolutely true, and even more for Lessig. I'm sorry, man, you got what you paid for.

    4. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't believe you. Anyone who's ever had to administer a BES server will feverishly tap on an iphone all day in desperate hope that they'll never have to hear the word "blackberry" again. The day iOS supported activesync was the day that BB started to fall.

      You could also, you know, actually investigate the enterprise features in iOS7 http://www.apple.com/ipad/business/it/management.html
      The enterprise management API is open and there are already several management solutions available from different vendors.

    5. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point is it Blackberries or Dingleberries?

    6. Re:Pardon me, but... by kommakazi · · Score: 1

      Yes just ignore the security questions, then when you lose access to the AppleID it's naturally Apple's fault you didn't set up those questions.

    7. Re:Pardon me, but... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I dislike android (its a POS given how big google is and how 'powerful' that company claims to be, genius-wise) but I refuse to buy an iphone since it will probably annoy me even more.

      I wish we had a 3rd choice. today, its either android or iphone and both of them fall way short of what I think a pocket computer SHOULD be.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Pardon me, but... by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Yes, Enable Location Services. No, don't use iCloud. No, I don't want to answer security questions. I told you this when I set up the phone the first time, and every time I've updated. Why do you keep asking me?

      Isn't this something that configuration profiles handle? You aren't setting up every iPhone manually are you?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    9. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'every time I've updated' would be *once*, since it's only requested when you update to a new major release of the OS, and the security questions were introduced during iOS 6.

    10. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy an iPhone, you have already given up most of your freedoms (regarding your phone), so what's the point bitching about it afterwards.

      As opposed to every other vendor out there that also does NOT support hacked/cracked/jailbroken cellular devices?

      Try not to be so fucking dramatic next time. Anyone can hack any cell phone, as plenty do. Bitching about it afterwards is a side effect of stupidity and ignorance unless you can blame someone else for tinkering with your new $500 toy that is now a brick.

    11. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have to agree. We're deploying iPhones to replace Blackberries and the number of hoops I had to jump through just to create Appled ID accounts for corporate use was mindnumbing. Not to mention the constant pestering with every update.

      Yes, Enable Location Services. No, don't use iCloud. No, I don't want to answer security questions. I told you this when I set up the phone the first time, and every time I've updated. Why do you keep asking me?

      Not to mention the joke with ID accounts themselves. You set one up then, when you go to load your first app, you're told you have to review/update your information so you can sign into iTunes! WTF?! I don't want to sign into iTunes. I want to install a free, non-Apple app.

      There is no way I can recommend an iPhone to anyone. Sure, they look cool and work (mostly), but the nagging and Big Brother nonsense just doesn't make them worth the effort.

      And yet, how much of the above functionality is available to an Android user who refuses to obtain a Google account, or sign into it once they power on their new shiny not-an-Apple phone?

      Yeah, I thought so.

      As if every other vendor isn't just as guilty for insisting you become a member of their collective borg for data mining.

    12. Re:Pardon me, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Try deleting your Apple ID. It's impossible, the best you can do is get them to mark it as dormant, and they told me that takes an engineer three weeks to do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Pardon me, but... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      When I created all the Apple IDs, I documented the password for each of them. There is no chance of them being lost.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    14. Re:Pardon me, but... by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps you will enjoy this video I just made regarding Apple, security, and the walled garden. (60 seconds)

      Apple's 1984 commercial with alternate ending:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENC6yvIOyJc

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    15. Re:Pardon me, but... by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if only there was a third option

      (note, I love my android devices)

    16. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am no fan of apple (still have a dumb phone and I like it), but I do support them in the office. You may want to look into the iphone configuration utility and configurator. Even then you sometimes have issues when a client phone and your system are on different versions.

    17. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could try blackberry or windows phone.

    18. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now you know why I love my BB. Everyone using an Apple product gets what they deserve. I remember when my friends with Mac II's would upgrade from 2 to 4 megs of RAM. Apple charged them for the 4 Megs, then took the original 2 back. So you netted 2 more megs, but paid for 4. It's only gotten worse since then.

    19. Re:Pardon me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me, I wish I had been rickrolled right now. Hell, I'd take Rebecca Black over that shitpile of a video.

    20. Re:Pardon me, but... by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Wow, just looked up Rebecca Black --- don't worry you got me back good

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  12. This comment has been deleted. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ZDNet notes, adding that as of this morning their reporter has been unable to obtain an official response from Apple.

    Maybe their wi-fi doesn't work.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:This comment has been deleted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh, but a major reason why Apple has been as successful as they have is their near monopoly in the media. Almost every tech journalist, editor, producer, right up the line have pretty much settled on Apple products and when a new Apple product comes out they are the first to buy and review them. Apple would take a huge risk pissing off this part of their market.

  13. I wonder if a DFU restore might fix... by mlts · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've read about glitches when one does an update, so I wonder if the Wi-Fi problem would go away if someone backed up their device (would have to be dumped to a computer with iTunes), did an erase all, then followed it up by a DFU restore. This method pretty much ensures that all data stored on the device is erased. Then the device can be restored, apps/music reinstalled, and things back to normal.

    This also stems from a general IT lesson I learned. If possible, when it comes to OS upgrading time with major number versions [1], one is best off rebuilding a server from scratch than updating it, due to cruft left behind from the previous OS, and other inconsistencies which might cause issues later on. Sometimes this isn't possible, other times, it is easily done.

    [1]: The cautious exception are RPM based Linux distros which are really just stacks of filesets snapshotted and regression tested at a certain point in time. Those, I can just increment the version number, run yum upgrade, and be done with it, since it is more of a large update than a major version upgrade. Even with these, it doesn't hurt to install from scratch since it seems that RPM databases tend to get corrupted over time.

    1. Re:I wonder if a DFU restore might fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's very little on the glitch; an article anyone?

      captcha: civil

    2. Re:I wonder if a DFU restore might fix... by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      but...but...I thought they were just supposed "to work"?

  14. IOS7 iz da SUK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IOS7 == Win8 == UNITY == BARF

  15. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't been here in a few years, have you?

  16. Freedom of the press by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Applies to the guy who owns the press.

    Apples behavior is pretty much expected, I doubt few if any companies would ever let people use their resources to organize action against them. It seems Lessig is going a little over the top in his reaction to this. It can hardly come as a shock to him.

    1. Re:Freedom of the press by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      A predictable outcome does not necessarily lessen the importance of the effort. You can see this kind of thing coming from a mile away but I'm still glad Lessig is doing it.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:Freedom of the press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples behavior is pretty much expected, I doubt few if any companies would ever let people use their resources to organize action against them.

      This doesn't make it any less scummy. It just makes it scummy and widespread.

    3. Re:Freedom of the press by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Applies to the guy who owns the press.

      Apples behavior is pretty much expected, I doubt few if any companies would ever let people use their resources to organize action against them. It seems Lessig is going a little over the top in his reaction to this. It can hardly come as a shock to him.

      Apple equals eyeballs, whether it is here or someone's blog. Dell, Microsoft, HP? Boring. Apple? Adrenaline. People just need to chill sometimes.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    4. Re:Freedom of the press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt few if any companies would ever let people use their resources
      to organize action against them.

      I was impressed to see that Barnes & Noble left up on their main purchase
      site many complaints about their backlit e-reader which was suffering
      from a delicate screen. The price was right so I brought one, and will
      now take care to avoid the method of damage posted by the unfortunates.

      No one was talking about a class action though.

  17. Dear Mr Lessing, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you seriously braindead to buy Apple products with your world view AND think it will work differently?

  18. I remember the days... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When every story on slashdot was "Microsoft sucks" and every comment was "If only Apple could get enough momentum to crush Microsoft."

    Oh how the times have changed... different companies, same bitches. You people are never happy. LOL.

    I, for one, welcome my new Apple Overlords.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:I remember the days... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Oh how the times have changed... different companies, same bitches. You people are never happy. LOL.

      Because although companies may change, the humans that run them are exactly the same. Call me when human nature changes.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:I remember the days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember those days at all. Slashdot was always more focused on Linux and BSD. Because back then, your options were Windows 98, Mac OS 7, or *nix.

    3. Re:I remember the days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hear the ghost of Steve Jobs comes out of the grave on Halloween and gives appl€s to all the children. He then tells them "you are holding it wrong."

  19. Yes, Apple deletes posts from their forums by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2

    Especially if you write that everyone should return their phones.

    Use another forum to get your word out Lessig. You know how this game is played.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:Yes, Apple deletes posts from their forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if you write that everyone should return their phones.

      Use another forum to get your word out Lessig. You know how this game is played.

      But if he did that, he would have one less thing to bitch about on his own blog, thus losing out on precious, tasty clickbait. Come on, YesIAmAScript. You know how this game is played.

    2. Re:Yes, Apple deletes posts from their forums by sqlrob · · Score: 2

      If only some major tech site would get the word out. Any you can suggest?

    3. Re:Yes, Apple deletes posts from their forums by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Why be a smart-ass and not recommend one yourself? I mean a lot of us here waste enough time with the likes of slashdot that we don't have time for reading major tech sites etc.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  20. Cool is elsewhere by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    all that matters is that I look cool when I hold it.

    I think Samsung took all the cool. Although the wind of coolness is definitely with LG right now.

    1. Re:Cool is elsewhere by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I think Samsung took all the cool. Although the wind of coolness is definitely with LG right now.

      Samsung cool? Just don't look too close. Starting with a CEO who is a convicted criminal (yes, he was pardoned because he was _so_ important for his country), multiple convictions for price fixing, getting confidential information about competitors from their lawyers, threatened with a multi-billion fine for anti-competitive behaviour in the EU, they are absolutely cool.

      And when they have nobody to copy, they create really cool products like their "gear" watch.

    2. Re:Cool is elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called gear because it's a nontrivial part of the process of being transformed into a tool..

  21. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by iamhassi · · Score: 0

    You must be new here, /. has been anti apple since Android came out years ago

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  22. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Over-react much? I have iOS 7 on an iPad, no problems with wifi. Also run a 15,000 member apple community and haven't heard any wifi complaints. I think this "angry mob" is just a angry man. Apple has no reason to censor anything, there's lots of complaints on the forums already

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  23. The Fix is Simple by segedunum · · Score: 1

    Buy a new iPhone........

  24. after lightning bold I quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to like apple, but after 3 broken cables, not being able to use better cables from Belkin but not apple licensed, I give up. iOS7 made my hotspot useless and 80 percent not being able to connect to it, battery life went to charging three times daily. No thanks.

  25. Those Imaginary Days by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    When every story on slashdot was "Microsoft sucks" and every comment was "If only Apple could get enough momentum to crush Microsoft."

    What days you are referring to? Microsoft still produces second quality software to the competition, but is a monopoly. Something they still are in the Legacy Desktop Software. Everybody was aware that Apple were/is going nowhere. There model simply does not allow it. They bundle their OS with commodity hardware and double the price...make lots of money, "crush"(sic) not so much.

    Most here have lamented the dull duopoly(I still do). Which hasn't changed. The fact that Apple is now an electronics company is proof of the fact.

    1. Re:Those Imaginary Days by Xest · · Score: 2

      "What days you are referring to? Microsoft still produces second quality software to the competition, but is a monopoly."

      Do they really though? The security arguments over Windows have been pretty much dead since Windows 7, and stability arguments dead going back to Windows 2000.

      Their office suite is still better than anything else, and their database server is at the higher end of the offerings available. Their dev tools are excellent.

      There is some shit they produce but Microsoft software is much better than it used to be, especially Windows itself. Windows Server is even a feasible option for hosting public internet facing servers now.

      Microsoft is far, far from perfect and their attempts in the tablet and phone world have been laughable, but much of their software is still at least as good, if not better than the competition.

      So when you say their software is second rate compared to the competition what competition are you referring to? are you implying all their software is second rate? If so then who provides, say, a better office suite? I know Bing isn't really as great as Google and so forth either but I don't think Microsoft is universally worse. The vast majority of the flack they used to get was about their OS being unstable and insecure, and it was, but now it's not so something has certainly changed, even if they still have a lot to do.

    2. Re:Those Imaginary Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the disaster that is Windows 8.

    3. Re:Those Imaginary Days by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      "What days you are referring to? Microsoft still produces second quality software to the competition, but is a monopoly."

      Do they really though? The security arguments over Windows have been pretty much dead since Windows 7, and stability arguments dead going back to Windows 2000.

      Well, lets see. Windows 8 sucks hairy donkey balls while we have yet to see most of the improvements that were promised for Longhorn. Security? Who hasn't visited their aunt only to end up spending an hour cleaning crapware off a Vista/7 machine?

      Office settled into "feature" mode since before Office 2007. A 10 year old version of Word or Excel will work just fine for 99.999% of users, but Microsoft keeps coming up with "features" to give people a "reason" to "upgrade". I'm using giant airquotes on "features" because Microsoft is like a company that makes washing machines: they don't really have anything new, but need to come out with new "features" to differentiate it from last years model.

    4. Re:Those Imaginary Days by Xest · · Score: 1

      Right, but what is better?

      You can bitch about things like Office all you want but it's still by far the best on the market and that's the point.

      I can find things to bitch about Chrome, lots of things, but there's still nothing better out there, and that's really the point.

      "Security? Who hasn't visited their aunt only to end up spending an hour cleaning crapware off a Vista/7 machine?"

      But at this point it's about users being stupid and not about inherent security flaws in the OS anymore and this problem exists on every OS - there isn't an OS on the planet that would protect your aunt from her own stupidity but for what it's worth the last time I had to clear crapware off any PC was an XP machine many years ago so even less educated users are protected from themselves better than they used to be, that doesn't mean there aren't the especially stupid few who still manage to install shit though.

  26. Re:Jobs would never have let that out the door... by DougOtto · · Score: 1

    I've been in the Apple developer program since it started. "Rolling back to an older version" has never been supported so I believe the notion that "Steve would've done it that way" is a bit far fetched.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
  27. Re:Jobs would never have let that out the door... by Fredde87 · · Score: 2

    Last time I checked it is still possible to downgrade to iOS 6... They have not blacklisted those upgrades yet so if you download the ipsw file you should be able to downgrade it until a fix is available...

  28. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Portions of the Slashdot community have been anti-Apple since the "hacker proof" sealed box Macintosh came out in 1984.

  29. So much anger and action by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    at broken shiny things I wodner if they would do the same against NSA supplied iphones.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  30. my 2 cents for Lessig by mugurel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check with Apple if you're holding your iPhone correctly.

  31. Problem not unique to Apple... by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: I am an Apple fan -- but I absolutely will not defend the practice of purging negative comments from community forums. I think censorship is probably the single most frustrating experience anyone can have in a forum, warranted or not. I speak from experience: I've been censored recently as well -- in an entirely different forum, and for reasons which seemed entirely unreasonable to me. Ironically, I had made the egregious error of trying to help.

    In responding to a thread about a bug, I described one software development methodology (scrum, if that matters) to a crowd of discontent gamers in the Steam forum. I then painstakingly crafted a reasoned explanation for why that process necessitates that this particular bug in an older game (Half-Life: Opposing Force, which had been recently ported to both Linux and Mac) simply won't be fixed anytime soon, because the Steam developers are almost certainly entirely wrapped up in the development of Half Life 3. I then went on to speculate (and I suspect this is where I went wrong) that as soon as we see a fix to that bug, we should all be on the lookout for the impending release of HL3. A short time later, that entire thread had suddenly vanished from the Steam forum, with no explanation.

    And the problem crops up elsewhere as well; forum admins are frequently overzealous, especially when they see something that they view as a potential slight to their corporate overlords. It's a very unfortunate trend, and as I see it, the only way to avoid being unreasonably censored is to post your comments elsewhere, where -- hopefully -- unbiased management will leave your commentary on controversial matters intact. (Slashdot might qualify as such a haven... I know I haven't been censored here. Yet.)

    1. Re:Problem not unique to Apple... by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      They're not purging negative comments, they're purging comments that are telling people to take their phones into Apple to have them exchanged under warranty because the update physically broke the wifi chip.

      There are plenty of critical comments of Apple and their products on those boards.

      However, that doesn't make for very effective click bait.

    2. Re:Problem not unique to Apple... by Arker · · Score: 1

      "There are plenty of critical comments of Apple and their products on those boards."

      As one should expect. Support forums are where people having problems with the products are supposed to go.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    3. Re:Problem not unique to Apple... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I described one software development methodology (scrum, if that matters) to a crowd of discontent gamers in the Steam forum. I then painstakingly crafted a reasoned explanation for why that process necessitates that this particular bug in an older game (Half-Life: Opposing Force, which had been recently ported to both Linux and Mac) simply won't be fixed anytime soon, because the Steam developers are almost certainly entirely wrapped up in the development of Half Life 3.

      What does Scrum have to to with allocation of development resources between development and bug fixing? I do mostly bug fixes rather than new feature development at my company, and we use scrum methodology for our maintenance team. I'm not sure how this would be even related to HL3, much less why you would think that HL3 is drawing resources from other projects to the point that bug fixes must stop.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:Problem not unique to Apple... by zarmanto · · Score: 1

      What does Scrum have to to with allocation of development resources ...

      Scrum in-and-of-itself isn't really critical to the issue I was attempting to address; I was only using it to help illustrate that development teams do not have unlimited resources. Scrum is simply one of the tools that my particular team uses to organize and prioritize our workload, so that we can appropriately allocate what limited resources we do have. I hypothesized (within the context of the original thread) that Valve likely uses some similar management methodology to organize their own workload.

      Also, not every dev shop has a dedicated "maintenance team"... I work in a small dev shop where all of us cross-task to both development and maintenance. So in my case, it's absolutely a given that higher priority tasks (such as new development of a highly anticipated game, for example) would take resources away from lower priority tasks (such as maintenance of a game that's over a decade old, and not bringing in any cash at all for the company).

    5. Re:Problem not unique to Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it could be based on team structure. For instance, where I work we have one team on a project. There is currently a known issue in the previous version of the product that merits a hot-fix however this hot-fix cannot be worked on until it has been approved and planned for in a sprint. Management has put off approving the work because it will ruin their precious burndown charts that are used to appease stakeholders.

  32. You must be unregulated. That's rare any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We're deploying iPhones to replace Blackberries

    We looked into this, but couldn't find a way to officially issue iPhones without running afoul of HIPAA/HITECH, GLB, SOX, and FDA regs on security and privacy.

    The stock iPhone and Android offerings aren't much better than Blackberries without BES. In the USA, you can't store privileged information on some random other company's servers unless you have a contract with the hosting company that transfers your legal responsibilities, and no telco (or Google, or Apple) is going to take on our legal obligations given the extremely harsh penalties for failure. With a BES server that's no big deal, since you have your own mail storage, etc.

    We can issue androids with tuned software that don't let the end-users screw up, but if users want iPhones they have to buy their own and sign a document that says they take personal responsibility for managing any legally privileged information that they can access through their position with the company.

    Everybody's happy now. The people who want the company to do the right thing legally, the Apple junkies who have their shiny, the users who have company androids, it's all good. The Apple users grumble about cost but they understand they could have had free androids so the grumbling's just for show.

  33. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Andrio · · Score: 1

    No one invited you here, Mr. Cook.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  34. You think Larry would know better! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    Come on Mr Lessig with your pedigree I would have peg you as an Android user likely somebody running a custom rom at least.

  35. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple has no reason to censor anything,

    If Apple has no reason to censor, then why are the comments disappearing from the forum? If people are legitimately experiencing wi-fi connection issues, shouldn't others be aware of it and Apple take the appropriate action?

    Or is Apple following the path of Nikon which refused to acknowledge the oil-on-the-censor issue on some non-insignificant portion of their D600 camera, then less than a year later released the D610 which miraculously doesn't have the issue but which is the exact same camera? Is that possibly why Apple just pushed out the 7.3 update?

    However, if people are having issue with wi-fi, how are they supposed to get the update since updating requires a wi-fi connection?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  36. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Kremmy · · Score: 1

    You're not going to hear those complaints because they don't have WiFi.

  37. But Android is forked and fragmented! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    At times like this, I am reminded that the alternative to fragmentation and forking and all manner of inconsistencies is monoculture. When monoculture works, it works nicely and that's all that most people have in mind when they strive for it. But the other side of that coin? What affects one, generally affects them all.

  38. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry too much - the chances of this affecting you are minimal. I've upgraded 6 different devices to iOS 7 over the last month (I waited until the 7.0.2 fix for the lock screen/security issues though) and haven't had any problems...this is the first I've heard of any WiFi complaints (and I read quite a lot of Apple stories).

  39. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like Apple. What I can't stand is their users. Every system have design flaws, Apples have plenty of them but for some reason the RDF is too strong.

    Seriously, just look at their USB power adapter. Who the fuck designs a switched regulator and places the switch diode on another PCB than the transformer? Also, folding back the low voltage part over the buffer capacitor doesn't seem like the brightest thing to do.

  40. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by wjcofkc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Personally, I as someone who overall likes Apple as a company, doesn't own anything but a Mac, but has had the chance to use their mobile products and do like them, I will first say I believe that the Slashdot crowd generally gives Apple a fair shake. Granted, this is not always flattering, but it is typically correct non-the-less.

    Second, Apple stories garner among the highest number of comments and therefore user interaction and ad views. Based on this it is clear that the Slashdot crowd likes discussing Apple related stories, which works out well for Slashdot since it (presumanbly) generates ad revenue. That is what is known as a 'win win'.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  41. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ".. Also run a 15,000 member apple community."

    sure you do.

  42. iOS7 and wifi by Cordus+Mortain · · Score: 1

    I've noticed my iPhone switches to 3G when I'm at home, which it never used to do. If I'm in the same room as the AP then it rarely does it, but otherwise it's a bit hit and miss. Thankfully I get a reasonable 3G signal where I live, and I have a pretty good data plan so I've not seen a huge impact. But I am looking forward to Apple fixing this.

  43. Violation of Policy by meerling · · Score: 1

    Posters are not allowed to attempt to compromise the lingering Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field, Apple is perfect, and perceived issues are figments of your imagination. Please remit all your money to Apple and thank us for the privilege to partake in our excellence. Thank you. :p

  44. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by jythie · · Score: 1

    All depends on your bias. The community, including the editors, are diverse enough that the techie culture wars play out in what stories get run and what spins are put on them by OPs.

    Though at the moment, hating Microsoft is passe, while all the cool kids hate Apple.

  45. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Apple has no reason to censor, then why are the comments disappearing from the forum? If people are legitimately experiencing wi-fi connection issues, shouldn't others be aware of it and Apple take the appropriate action?

    Exactly. As you just said, Apple has no reason to censor posts in their forums, and thus they aren't. Clearly, in the hysteria that quite reasonably surrounds any Apple product release, these people must have simply forgotten that they never made such blasphemous and hurtful posts against Apple, and are clearly just mistaken about ever having posted anything at all.

  46. Apple has time to delete posts but not answer them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it annoying apple has time to delete posts like this but almost never actually help people in their support forums. When I bought a new Mac Mini last year, there was a known issue with their shitty HDMI adapter included with the device and Ivy Bridge chip in the unit. Apple did eventually fix it, but their support people denied it's existence while the forms were full of complaints. If they guy would have said "it's a problem and we're working on it" I would have been a happy guy. Instead, I got some bullshit about reinstalling OS X on a brand new computer I had for 2 hours.

    I've had wifi problems with Apple TV on and off for years and apple never fixes it. It's no shock their weird in kernel DHCP would freak out right? Apple probably did some new speed hack in iOS 7 and broke that too.

  47. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    butbutbut...the housing is smoooooth and silllly whiiite...smoooth and shinyy...

  48. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this "angry mob" is just a angry man.

    Yes, because as anyone who's familiar with Lessig's work knows, he's *so* hot-headed, overly emotional, and generally unreasonable. Watch the 'angry man' rave!

    /sarcasm

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  49. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have another experience, this new iOS 7 improved or nearly eliminated my WiFi dropouts, the known WPA2 handshake problem that has been affecting some routers and iOS 6.

  50. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    The same question might be asked of you fanboys: Don't you get tired of defending the windmills?..or does it help compensate for lack of self-worth? That's what apple marketing predates on. It's right up there with scientology.

  51. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I manage 44 devices in building that use iOS7, this week I've had 108 wifi connection issues on those 44 devices and it's only Tuesday.

    The 121 devices running Mac OS, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Linux that I manage have had 0 wifi connection issues.

  52. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think it has a thing to do with being "anti-Apple" but in reality folks just waking up and realizing the quality of Apple products has seriously gone down hill since the passing of Jobs.

    Say what you will about Jobs, and from what I've read I'd say he was probably a sociopath, but the man did care about the quality of his products. If given the choice of shaving pennies and making something low quality or going for the better tech and raising the price Jobs always seemed to go for the latter which is probably why they built up a rep for quality products. Compare this to Cook who came from the supply side of Apple and seems to be more concerned with stock price and maximizing profits than he does with quality and frankly it shows, with iPhone 5s suffering BSODs and having maps that are a joke and now this?

    I'm sorry but the longer we go past the death of Jobs the more it looks like Apple is taking a page from Sony's book and trading on past reputation by putting out less quality products priced as if it were quality. So while you see it as bashing I see it as customers waking up and realizing the much vaunted Apple quality just ain't what it used to be.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  53. there are ways to handle something like this by milkmage · · Score: 1

    he was made whole (got a 5 instead of the 4s he purchased in July 2013 (a 4s? this year? really?)
    and continued to complain (in a non constructive/technical way) despite the fact that he was made whole by his carrier... so if it works for the VAST majority of users, and his problem was resolved by getting new hardware.. why continue?

    stopped reading after the first few lines - Lessig is a fucking crybaby.
    http://lessig.tumblr.com/post/65338904338/wow-or-from-the-when-apple-became-the-borg-department

    There are far too many of us affected for this to be a coincidence or consumer caused problem, I had a 16gb white 4s purchased in July 2013 and wifi was completely greyed out no matter what fixes I was advised to try.

    I have been successful in my claim and am now in receipt of a brand new iPhone 5, this was provided to me by the phone shop I signed my O2 contract with last year.

    Good luck and persevere

    Later, I tried to post a question to the post — basically asking whether Apple indeed scrubbed comments, meaning it was worth it for them to censor the community, just not respond to it — but it wouldn’t post.

  54. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every system have design flaws, Apples have plenty of them but for some reason the RDF is too strong.

    The RDF has grown weaker every day since Jobs' death. A cult can only outlast its cult leader if it becomes a full-blown religion. And something tells me that Tim Cook is no St. Paul.

  55. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Pieroxy · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've upgraded all my iOS devices, everyone I know that own one has also upgraded. No issue so far. Your pick.

  56. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't been here in a few years, have you?

    Since I don't have access to a time machine, I cannot have been here in a few years. Maybe you could tell us your experience of the future Slashdot?

  57. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple regularly remove bug reports, broken functionality and test cases demonstrating problems. There is no need for them to censor this, other than PR people trying to create the illusion that there are no problems. They've been doing this for several years.

  58. Apple has a bad history of this. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has no reason to censor anything, there's lots of complaints on the forums already

    And yet they do it. Frequently. Here's a few more examples.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re: Apple has a bad history of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I simply urged consumers to exercise their rights under sale of goods act 1979 (UK) and they removed that saying I was ranting

    2. Re:Apple has a bad history of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories!

  59. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been an actual analysis of the USB power adapter in question, and it turns out that the design is both more efficient than most on the market, and *safer* than many of the el-cheapo models available on the market (having the appropriate physical gaps between various sections of the power conversion process).

  60. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also run a 15,000 member apple community and haven't heard any wifi complaints.

    What in the nine hells is an "apple community"? And why haven't we nuked it from orbit several times yet?

  61. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think it has a thing to do with being "anti-Apple" but in reality folks just waking up and realizing the quality of Apple products has seriously gone down hill since the passing of Jobs.

    This is a hardware problem, from a phone that came out while jobs was still alive. Troll much?

  62. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, if people are having issue with wi-fi, how are they supposed to get the update since updating requires a wi-fi connection?

    Oh, I don't know, use a USB cable and iTunes!?!? Seriously, it doesn't "require" a wifi connection. And you should be hooking into iTunes regularly anyway to make backups of the phone.

  63. I'm Curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a man like Lawrence Lessig, who obviously values openness and freedom, use a locked down, walled-in garden device?

    1. Re:I'm Curious... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about that too. Don't know the answer. It could have been a gift, he could depend on some particular software that requires it, there could be family reasons. Etc.

      So I'm curious, but it's really probably none of my business.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  64. Apple has systemic problems, here's another : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 2011 Macbook Pro.

    This machine has the architechture which involves the Intel CPU with an onboard
    GPU which is used for basic graphics and an external AMD Radeon which is used
    for more intensive graphics.

    The "geniuses" at the Apple Store have tested my computer three times and failed to
    reproduce the issues I am having with this machine, which include kernel panics,
    bizarre mutations of the on-screen graphics, and outright lockups. So far I have
    invested well over 20 hours of my time in calling Applecare reps, visiting the Apple Store
    Genius Bar, and driving to and from the Apple store. Apple has refused to install RAM which
    is "known good" and let me take the machine home for a few days to use the machine and
    see if the faults continue, yet the problems for some reason only occur when I use the machine
    for extended periods ( 12 - 14 hours is routine usage ) and so using the machine is the only
    way to determine if the machine works properly or not.

    Essentially Apple has done everything to make this experience unpleasant, time-consuming,
    and thus far there has been no resolution to the machine's problems. Apple has steadfastly refused
    to consider that the problems my machine is having are hardware-related, and has instead insisted
    on doing not one but two "clean installs" of OS X. After both of these clean installs, the machine has
    continued to have problems and thus the clean installs have solved nothing.

    I have had many other issues with Apple hardware resolved quickly and easily at the same Apple store,
    but I sense there has been a "sea change" in how Apple directs its store employees and Applecare
    employees to deal with problems. The company which used to consistently provide me with a customer
    service experience which was among the best I have ever experienced has changed, and the experience
    they are providing me now is unnecessarily difficult and has worked against solving the problems my Macbook
    is having. Of course, those people who have been following Macbook Pro model issues for some time
    will be aware that the Macbook Pro which uses software-enabled graphics switching and an AMD or Invidia
    graphics processor will be aware that these Macbook Pros are infamous for having problems.

    I suppose all of you who hate Apple will laugh at this story.

    It seems I will soon be going the ranks of people who used to buy Apple products,
    because the practical reality is that Apple stuff costs too much for me to subject myself
    to this poor customer service. I can get this kind of idiotic "genius" service most anywhere,
    while paying perhaps a third as much as I would pay for a Macbook Pro. I reckon this is
    also as good a time as any to ditch the iPhone and all the rest of the nice looking Apple hardware
    I have which doesn't actually work as well as I'd like.

    .

  65. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sounds like you do actually care about Apple one way or the other. If you didn't care you wouldn't be concerned with upgrading your iPad.

  66. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by pla · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is a hardware problem, from a phone that came out while jobs was still alive. Troll much?

    A software update that came out this year counts as a hardware problem from before Steve killed someone by gaming the organ transplant system? You'll have to explain that logic to me...

  67. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...stories like this keep me informed that I should continue hitting "Not Now" when my iPad bugs me to upgrade to iOS7

    If you've been using computers, smartphones, tablets etc. for any length of time, you should already know:

    NEVER install "version 1" of ANYTHING!

  68. it just works! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Or rather it used to.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:it just works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather it used to.

      When?

      Me: Why did you buy an Apple?
      User: Because I need a computer that just works.
      Me: But you spent $5K on a laptop to run Microsoft Word and read email!
      User: I need a computer that just works
      Me: Fine.

      User: My Apple broke again, fix it now! I need to finish editing my Word document! My deadline is in an hour!!!
      Me: I thought you said it just works.
      User: Shut up and fix it.

  69. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by lgw · · Score: 1

    Portions of the Slashdot community have been anti-Apple since the "hacker proof" sealed box Macintosh came out in 1984.

    I've been anti-Apple since I could never afford one when I was young (Atari/Amiga FTW!). But Apple has a long track record of abusing it's customer base. On a good year, it shoots itself in the foot on customer support. On a bad year, they have to re-hire Jobs to save the company.

    TFA is yet another "shooting itself in the foot on customer support" moment, pretty much par for the course. But the next time they make one of their big mistakes, who will save them now?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  70. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He states that people fixed this "software issue" by heating the phone up to 300, sounds like the wifi chip has a lose connection. The update is a coincident, and with millions of phones out there and only a handful of people with issues it's safe to assume that the two are not related.

  71. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, they are most definitely censoring, they are trying to keep their stock price up, only it's backfiring.

    The fucktards in charge are mindless cash groupies, trying to engage in orgiastic delight in the sycophants and apple fan-boyz mindless support of all things Apple even when their updates brick their iCrap product line.

    All the more reason this one will NEVER own an Apple product, ever.

  72. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because posts are being removed, I should know apple staff threatened to notify my ISP info continued to post. All I was trying to do was let other 4s users know they were not along. My local apple store looked me in the eye and said they had not heard a single issue. Open your eyes from being apple blind, we are not trolls, apple haters or Samsung employees, we are real people why feel they have a genuine case. I exercised my rifts under sale of goods act in the uk and have been provided with a replacement free of charge despite being out of warranty. How would you feel if you were one of these people who are having their freedom of speech taken away. Wake up and smell the ****! The consumer has not created this issue, apple have as it appears there are a number of handsets that had a manufacuring fault that only came to light recently, you may think its coincidence, but to the hundred, possibly thousands (who knows as apple remove their posts) of people who have 4s that are not fit for purpose, how do you think they feel?

  73. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPads aren't affected toy knowledge, the pattern seems to show its specific to 4s that are over 12 months old. My iPad works perfectly well, but my 4s randomly used up my data allowance in 9 days (during sleeping hours), then would tab connect to wifi and then overheated and that was that

  74. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Minter92 · · Score: 1

    You must be new here, /. has been anti apple since 1998 and we made fun of OS 8

  75. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell no, we revel in the almost daily saga of Apple fuckups and missteps. It's like watching a 30 minute comedy only the people we are laughing at think they are serious and think they are innovators, rather than simply idea thieves throwing other peoples work together haphazardly and incorrectly.

  76. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by omnichad · · Score: 2

    If English isn't your first language, don't make fun of someone using common phrases correctly.

  77. Celebrity journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh okay, now that a celebrity is involved I should care more than I did before? I'm glad apple treated him evenhandedly-- just like any other commenter they want to nullify. Is Slashdot now a check-out like celebrity rag for nerds?

  78. +1 by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Mod this +1

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  79. It's Halloween and the Ghost of Jobs is Haunting by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Apple needs to hire an old priest and a young priest and exorcise the demon spirit of Jobs from the forums!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  80. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    and why is Apple actually admitting to doing it

  81. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iphones have always had quality antennas.

  82. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Jicehix · · Score: 1

    Or is Apple following the path of Nikon which refused to acknowledge the oil-on-the-censor issue on some non-insignificant portion of their D600 camera, then less than a year later released the D610 which miraculously doesn't have the issue but which is the exact same camera?

    At first, I read "Nixon". And I was really wondering what the hell he had to do with cameras.

    --
    Jicehix
  83. Good thing Apple IDs have never been stolen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/08/07/0250248/how-apple-and-amazon-security-flaws-led-to-mat-honans-identity-theft?sdsrc=rel

    Look I hate the "security questions" bit much more than the next guy, but as long as Apple doesn't secure your account with proper two factor authentication you've got to consider that someone could steal your AppleID and change the password.

    Of course, if they can do that then they can also change your "security questions" ... which is part of why I hate that model.

  84. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    Hopefully Cook learned his lesson after hiring some exec from a discount chain, to manage the Apple Retail operations. That was a disaster, and though it took a year to hire a replacement, the new retail exec at least comes from a place that cares about image and quality over penny-pinching.

  85. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hint: if the post you're replying to has been modded Funny, you should probably check that you're not about to Whooooooosh before you post.

  86. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You must be new here, /. has been anti apple since Android came out years ago

    The question then is why was Lessig — who co-founded Creative Commons (and was a board member of the Free Software Foundation) using an iPhone in the first place?

    You sort of expect just a little more dogfooding that that from a pontificater like Lessig.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  87. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Holi · · Score: 1

    Are you serious, Apple has a history of heavily censoring their forums to remove any possible blemishes to their product lines.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  88. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

    "Say what you will about Jobs, and from what I've read I'd say he was probably a sociopath, but the man did care about the quality of his products. If given the choice of shaving pennies and making something low quality or going for the better tech and raising the price Jobs always seemed to go for the latter which is probably why they built up a rep for quality products. "

    I am not so sure about this. I readily agree it is a common belief that Apple has (or had) some kind of commitment to quality, but for years their products have been using the exact same components as basically everyone else. Open up a Mac from any of the last 10+ years and you will find the same CPUs, RAM, hard drives, graphics cards, etc as found in most PCs. I think by charging a lot more for the same components, putting them in a pretty case, and doing some very effective advertising they created a sense of added quality in their fan's minds without actually spending any extra pennies on actually providing anything above average. I don't know how well these same concepts apply to the iThings as they are not so easy to open up and look at the vendor names on the components :) but I suspect it's much the same as Apple's strategy with PC hardware. There have certainly been a fair number of hardware and software defects in the iPhone line (antenna-gate, the daylight savings fail, the daylight savings fail II (aka revenge of the incompetence), various crazy bandwidth consumer glitches, and so on), most of which predate Jobs untimely demise.

    There is quite a bit of evidence to support how irrelevant factors can make huge influences on perceived "quality", for instance I recall watching a video where utility water out of garden hose was served in a fancy bottle and folks were asked if they preferred it to some major brand bottled water. Vast majority picked the hose water if it's packaging was made to appear "premium" compared to the alternative. Apple seems to have found ways to package their products to inspire a similar reaction.

    --
    -Lod
  89. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you serious,

    Did you even read past the first sentence of his post?

  90. What WiFi Problem? by GigG · · Score: 1

    I handed out 23 5Cs to my staff a week after it was released. I also updated 10 iPads of various models to iOS 7. I've yet to have anyone complain about WiFi problems either on our work network or in the field on client networks.

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    1. Re:What WiFi Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your staff is having some minor issues, but mostly they're thankful to be off those Android crap phones and onto real technology.

  91. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but the longer we go past the death of Jobs the more it looks like Apple is taking a page from Sony's book and trading on past reputation by putting out less quality products priced as if it were quality. So while you see it as bashing I see it as customers waking up and realizing the much vaunted Apple quality just ain't what it used to be.

    Good. This is a good thing, Apple and Jobs' visions of computing need to die an ugly spiraling death. Jobs' was the worst thing to happen to personal computing. Him and his silly app store junk. I mean no disrespect for the dead, but I'm glad Jobs is gone, and even more pleased Apple is circling the drain. Good riddance.

  92. Apple - the perfect company for America by runeghost · · Score: 1

    It's like a microcosm of the country as a whole

  93. iOS 5 was the PC-free update by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought the big attraction of iOS 5 (two versions ago) was the ability to backup to iCloud and do further system software upgrades without needing to buy a Mac, buy Windows for your PC, or even buy a PC in the first place.

  94. ios 7 is a buggy mess by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    I've had lots of problems before and after 7.0.3. More than once I have had to reboot to regain sending email (receiving is fine). My 2nd phone, a Blackberry using activesync just like my iPhone, was still sending and receiving email no problem so I know it wasn't something with the server.

    Other problems include buggy podcast playing. I've updated the podcast app so I hope it will be more stable.

    I also REALLY do not like the way a "hard reset" no longer closes all apps. This is a big deal for businesses where users just aren't going to close all the apps themselves. Come on Apple, what are you doing to us?

  95. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by TheReaperD · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disclosure: I used to work for Apple in their Customer Relations Department.

    You are correct that the perceived quality of Apple products is just the same Chinese manufactured products in a flashy shell with really good advertising. I know they've been doing this since the return of Steve Jobs to apple and the candy colored iMacs. I can't speak about before that time. How they managed to create the perception of superior quality products while using the same cut-rate manufacturers used by Dell while at the same time instituting Apple's infamous "No Return" policy is baffling to me. You couldn't even return same day D.O.A. (Dead on Arrival) equipment to the store you bought it from. You had to take it in for repair. Add this with the debacle of the Power Mac G4 Cube which had over a 33% D.O.A. rate that Apple was denying and their success can't be explained by anything short of Jobs making a deal with the devil. It's that illogical. Needless to say that it was not a fun time to work for Apple Customer Relations.

    Their policies have improved some, mostly due to the work of the Attorneys General of several states and the European Union but, they still use the same manufacturing facility that all the other electronic companies use (Foxconn). So all they still do is put it in a pretty package and charge more for it. Yet, people still fall for it in droves. *sigh* I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  96. Monthly download caps by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you're stuck on 5 GB/mo cellular or 10 GB/mo satellite Internet, every bit of server-side filtering helps. Not everyone is in a position to buy cable or fiber Internet.

  97. Rootstrikers by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dr. Lessig has long since moved on from copyright advocacy to researching a fix for the regulatory capture that led to imbalanced copyright laws in the first place.

  98. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by geekoid · · Score: 1

    well, you pool of 6 clearly proves it's ok.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  99. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by jbolden · · Score: 0

    I don't know about "perceived quality". I just had a fan go bad and slight flaws in my retina screen. I brought the laptop to the Apple store. Overnight the laptop was open, the screen replaced the fan cleaned for me and the system works perfectly. No hassling for hours having to reboot again and again on the phone with a tech support person who was trying to avoid doing anything. That's not perceived quality, that's real customer service.

    I also have a 12" G4 laptop that I bought during the 10.3 days (about a decade ago) that I use as a spare. Still works perfectly. My in laws are using a powermac which was updated from OS9 to OSX 10.2 which is almost 13 years old. No one has had to bother with it for a decade in terms of maintenance.

  100. Streisand Affect Anyone by Heretic2 · · Score: 1

    Yup...

  101. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by jbolden · · Score: 1

    This quarter $37.5b in revenues and $7.5b in profits. That's circling the drain?

  102. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by jbolden · · Score: 1

    Apple is upset about people losing their cool and advising people to return products over a minor software issue. Their forums contain valuable information about "blemishes" from years back, advice and fixes on thousands of issues.

  103. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    At what rate would you think it proper to publish anti-Apple stories? An anti-Apple story is published once a year? Once a month? Weekly? Daily? Hourly?

    .
    Given the number of happily-satisfied Apple users (is there any other kind of Apple user), maybe the number of anti-Apple stories published should be zero.

  104. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    You must be new here; most of the time the news slams Microsoft and praises Apple.

    I'm not new and have no idea what you're talking about. Microsoft doesn't count, they've been messing up ever since the iPad took them by surprise.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  105. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    Apple has a long track record of abusing it's customer base.

    I bought some Apple products and don't feel abused. I also run Fedora as my main desktop so no RDF here. I recently had a problem with my iPhone and they happily replaced it. I'm not sure what TFA is really about but personally, I've not had any problems with iOS7 (wifi or otherwise) and neither has my family.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  106. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by twocows · · Score: 1

    "It works for me, therefore the bug must be trivial or non-existent"
    Are you really posting that here, of all places? Like, really? If there's "lots of complaints on the forums already," clearly there are a lot of people who do have problems with WiFi and it would be prudent to avoid doing something that would precipitate that loss.

  107. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dimeglio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple has been dying since 1982.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  108. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucktards in charge are mindless cash groupies

    Someone mod this guy funny.

  109. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Not exactly...

    I'm looking at my new(ish) 15" MacBook Pro. Here are the differences between it and my previous laptop, the Samsung 15" RC-512:

    * The screen/lid does not flex when I open it (the Samsung did exactly that - freaky as hell at times)
    * Ditto for the case when I pick it up.
    * I can run a hellishly complex CG scene through LuxRender without kicking the CPU thermals and causing the whole laptop to shut down (The Samsung required a bit of a cool-down period before I could even reboot the stupid thing)
    * I can run the aforementioned renderer, LibreOffice, and Chrome all at once in OSX without an appreciable slowdown. Windows 7? Not so much. Even Linux would struggle at times on the Samsung box if I dared to do that.
    * The hard disk hasn't failed, and I've had the MBP for 4 months now... about 2 months longer than the HDD held up on the Samsung.
    * The screen and color balance is far nicer, and the image far crisper. Also, I suspect that given AppleCare, I don't have to put up with static from customer support like I did when a dead pixel showed up on the Samsung at around month 7.
    * Drivers? Who has to care about that anymore?

    Meanwhile, a couple of other bits that put me firmly in the Apple-buying camp:

    * My wife's iPad took a tumble a month ago, cracking the screen. $40 and a trip to the Apple Store later, she had a new one, all sync'd up with the data from her old one. No static from the counter at all (it costs about $80 or so IIRC for the factory 2-year accident protection plan, but damned well worth it so far, as it has already paid for itself.)
    * Last year, I found out they had a recall on the old Gen1 iPod Nanos. I fished through some old boxes, found my old 2GB critter, and sent it in. Apple sent back a 6th-gen 8GB Nano... all of this free of charge. I bought the thing in late 2005.
    * I bought a dual-G5 PowerMac in 2004. I gave it away to a friend, still fully-functional (with OSX 10.3 on it) in June of this year.
    * I did the same thing in 2005 with an old PowerBook laptop built in 1994 - the battery was down to holding maybe 20 minutes charge or so, but damn - no laptop battery from that era hold a charge after 10 years... this one still did, and it still ran MacOS7 just fine.

    When you can show me an OEM that has that kind of quality and service at the same (let alone cheaper!) prices, come talk.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  110. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dintech · · Score: 1

    Really? My iphone 4S and my wife's iphone 4s both drop calls all the time. Almost every call I make I have to redial at least once. Never happened with any other phone.

  111. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dintech · · Score: 1

    Apple is new new Microsoft. The king is dead, long live the king!

  112. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Add this with the debacle of the Power Mac G4 Cube which had over a 33% D.O.A. rate that Apple was denying and their success can't be explained by anything short of Jobs making a deal with the devil.

    Really? My Cube held up just fine in spite of my worst efforts.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  113. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My iPhone 4S and my wife's iPhone 4S both have been upgraded to iOS 7 and have no issue with WIFI at all. Where did they come from?

  114. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Kylon99 · · Score: 1

    Blackberry, net income 2009 - 2011
    2009 - $1.893B
    2010 - $2.457B
    2011 - $3.411B! You call that circling the drain? ... oops... 2012, $1.164B ... 2013 $646M net loss....

    Mere net income quarterly or yearly does not give you the whole picture. Or else you'll be in the same situation with BlackBerry. You're right though. It's now actually called, "Circling the RIM."

  115. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Kylon99 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, forgot the link to the data, if anyone's actually even interested.
    http://www.statista.com/statistics/221666/net-income-of-rim-since-2009/

  116. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by hedleyroos · · Score: 1

    "oil-on-the-censor". I see what you did there.

  117. Re:Jobs would never have let that out the door... by HiThere · · Score: 1

    This depends on what year you're talking about. In the early days, up through OSX (don't remember the version) that's pretty much true, though again, not totally. He was fanatic on quality, but he also didn't like to admit a mistake. So he would have ensured more thorough testing. Towards the end, though, we have seen numerous "misfeatures" being released. This, admittedly, sounds worse than most, but I seem to recall one event of machines being bricked...and Apple being quite reluctant to fix things. (I don't remember whether they ever did or not, or whether they fixed *some* of them.)

    So. It might have happened under Jobs, but he would have worked harder to prevent it. But he might well not have been any more willing to admit it.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  118. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You couldn't even return same day D.O.A. (Dead on Arrival) equipment to the store you bought it from.

    You can, since I did exactly that twice.

  119. Apple? Bugs? The hell you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According the my cult of Apple colluges Apple never delivers any products with bugs and software on Apple devices never crashes. So this wifi not working problem on IOS 7 does not exist thus is heresey and his comments absoulty deserve to be censored. He is lucky he isn't flogged to death in public for his blasphemy. It would serve him right and serve as a reminder to others who speak out of turn.

  120. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, How can anyone expect anything else from Apple. People that likes Free software and Open Source shouldn't use their products, as again and again Apple screws them.

  121. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well your anecdotal evidence proves there must have not been a 33% DOA rate then. Did you happen to buy at least 68% of them?

  122. This is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People spend entirely too much time connected to the internet and not enough time admiring the intrinsic beauty that is the iPhone.

  123. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by exomondo · · Score: 1

    I think this "angry mob" is just a angry man. Apple has no reason to censor anything, there's lots of complaints on the forums already

    The RDF is so strong in some people that even Apple themselves can't overcome it! Comments have been disappearing and they even admitted to removing the poll.

  124. No, you don't. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    When every story on slashdot was "Microsoft sucks" and every comment was "If only Apple could get enough momentum to crush Microsoft."

    For more than a decade, every time Apple does something unpopular or questionable, there's at least one guy who comes in saying "now if this were Microsoft, you'd all be up in arms."

    Taking shots at Apple has been as much a part of Slashdot's history as hot grits and goatse. From back in their belagured days, through the first iMac, through the first iPod, straight on through the post-Jobs era.

  125. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. I know people who have returned products within the window when a new version of it is released without any hassle.

  126. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    That was a missed opportunity, OS8 was positively stable when compared with the abortion which was OS7.5.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  127. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Because once Steve Jobs passed away they suddenly had to hire 10,000 employees to make up for it, then train them to program, debug, solder, assemble hardware, test, manage projects, and all those hundreds of other jobs that Jobs personally performed without help.

  128. Hello Streisand. Welcome to the spotlight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its true that Apple is a walled garden, and also true that Apple fubared the wifi in their new OS, and should have tested it before releasing it. Now they have attempted to bully pulpit their detractors by attempting censorship. Enter out-of-band anger and the "Streisand Effect"(tm). They could have done a mea culpa, stated that they were working on a fix and apologized to users. Instead they go all borg and attempt using sticks and censorship. Oh that will fix things. So now everyone on /. knows, the pitchforks are out and torches are lit Apple has earned full Streisand. Let the rants and dumping begin.

  129. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're blaming their users for a USB design flaw that only seems obvious if you're an electrical engineer?

  130. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    /. bashed Apple when Jobs was alive. But I do agree that Jobs gladly spent the time and money making every product the best on the market and charging extra for it, so if you were buying Apple at least you knew you were getting a good product. I hope Apple continues that tradition. The maps fiasco happened shortly after his death so I think that would have happened no matter what and the 5s is just the 5 that is revamped and Jobs oversaw the development of the 5. The iPhone 6 being released Fall 2014 is what will be the interesting phone since Jobs had no part of the 6. Will they maintain the high quality we've come to expect? Or will Apple build plastic phones with giant screens like Samsung? Who knows, Apple could do anything on the next generation phone.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  131. so add an official "don't do this" comment by Chirs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Arguably the most ethical response is to leave the original comment there, but preface it with a note from tech support suggesting that the recommendation is not correct and giving reasons why.

  132. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's their current policy, I would expect a web archive link for your comment to be relevant.

  133. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uhh... come again? I don't know what your definitions of D.O.A or "take it in for repair" is, but I've taken in faulty Apple hardware to Apple stores "for repair" and got totally new ones. Not just me either, I've had colleagues that had similar experience.

    The best case was my colleague who had a slightly cracked 3gs screen which was totally his fault. We went to the Apple store at lunch time "for repair" and came out with a new phone at no cost. This was right after the 3gs came out.

    There's _your_ anecdotal evidence against mine.

    Now if you're talking about Apple re-sellers, that is a different problem and nothing to do with Apple.

  134. needless to say... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Did they also censor Barbara Streissand's comments? Just kidding, it's such a given to make that joke about Apple, she practically works in their PR department, lol.

  135. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by jbolden · · Score: 1

    In early 2011 BlackBerry was fine. Though they had been forced downmarket since about 2006. That being said, jad they released a product the quality of the Z10 then they would have been fine. Their problems in terms of releases came after with failure and delay.

  136. There are other issues too beside iOS7. by antdude · · Score: 1

    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5460803 for "How to locally sync an iPhone with OS X Mavericks? iCloud is NOT an option."

    Not everyone wants to use the clouds!!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  137. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

    Yes, now you can. Again thank your Attorneys General and the E.U. for that.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  138. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

    To be fair, I didn't post backup to my statement either. I never took a copy of the Apple internal knowledge base pages to post, I'm afraid.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  139. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by dvaldenaire · · Score: 1

    This. Exactly this. Noone with ethics could buy this. No matter technology or quality.

    --
    What does it mean, "appended to the end of comments you post"
  140. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, prey is also a verb.

  141. Hey dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you worked in one department long ago doesn't mean you know what's going on in the others now, or even have much of a grasp of the other industries your corporate overlord was involved in.

    The factories at Foxconn and elsewhere who manufacture parts for gadgets like the iPhone "bin" those parts according to levels of failure risk. Apple strong-arms or buys their way into use of the higher-binned parts. That is why many more Mac Pros from 2006 are still humming along than the boxen slapped together for HP, Dell, Sony, and so on for the same year.

    I worked at Apple for over five years. I flew to Shanghai and assisted with diagnostics in the factories. I was there. You were wedged in a call center booth collecting hearsay to gripe anonymously about later online. Figures that you'd be doing it here in the forgotten wastelands of Slashdot.

    1. Re: Hey dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgotten wasteland? Because no one visits slashdot anymore?

    2. Re: Hey dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only us buzzards.

  142. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    The screen/lid does not flex when I open it (the Samsung did exactly that - freaky as hell at times)

    I don't think I've ever seen a laptop do that. Even Sony VAIO's, with the super thin cases that felt like they would break if you applied pressure never did that.

    I can run the aforementioned renderer, LibreOffice, and Chrome all at once in OSX without an appreciable slowdown. Windows 7? Not so much. Even Linux would struggle at times on the Samsung box if I dared to do that.

    Pretty sure it would be fine using Windows 7 or Linux on the Mac (I get better performance on Windows and Linux on my MacBookPro 15" because OS X's I/O scheduler is pretty terrible in comparison, fairly noticeable when you use a HDD instead of a SSD. Just get some large read/write operation going and it just blocks other read/write operations notably).

    Drivers? Who has to care about that anymore?

    If you run Windows on a Mac, you have to, because Apple never bothered adding stuff like audio support to their Bluetooth drivers for Windows. OS X Mavericks drivers don't play well with DisplayLink which worked fine on previous versions. VirtualBox drivers stop working, which worked on previous versions. A whole bunch of CUPS printers stopped working with OS X Maverick's CUPS...

    When you can show me an OEM that has that kind of quality and service at the same (let alone cheaper!) prices, come talk.

    Lenovo so far has been better and cheaper for me (and they don't insult me with a 'pro' line of laptops with only two USB slots and no kensington locks).

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  143. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm not getting this. Why should I care about switched regulator designs and/or "folding back the low voltage part over the buffer capacitor"? I'm not an electrical engineer, and am not really qualified to judge the aesthetics of power adapter design. Does this make it less effective? Less reliable? Less safe?

    The antenna issue with the 4 was legit, although as far as I could tell overblown. If I licked my finger and put it on a certain spot, I'd reliably lose one bar.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  144. All bow down to holy Apple (but watch your behind) by doccus · · Score: 1

    The first computer I ever owned was a Mac. From then on, even though I always also had a PC, (with BeOS and Windows both, incidentally).. I always switched to doing my stuff on the Mac when I wanted to de-stress myself. It wasn't really suitable for serious work except audio and graphics though, because OS 8x was prone to bringing down the entire farm when it crashed. When OSX appeared, having had some experience with unix-y systems already (I know.. i know.. BeOS is not unix related.. regardless) I soon got to like this BSD based system. Each major upgrade was better, faster, and more compatible than the previous.. and nothing was ever changed simply for "changes' sake". Even after classic compatibility was dropped in 10.5, there were workarounds (like Sheepshaver) that seemed to work, and the swich to Intel did open up the door for new opportunites. About the time that Steve Jobs first got sick, and (entirely understandably!) lost some of his focus, Snow Leopard (10.6) came out. No significant new features except the app store, but lots of functions were dumped, such as things power users had come to depend on being able to alter, for instance, contextual menus, and other tweaks that allowed for a smoother and faster workflow. Themes and other modifications, which can be very helpful also, as some were helpful in reducing eye fatigue, were completely blocked, putting some companies which had been the staunchest Apple supporters, entirely out of business.And, boy oh boy was it slower. On an iMac which was 3 months old when 10.6 came out, it ran more than four times as slow,. Finder windows would take 5 or 6 seconds to open, on a good day. In fact the Finder was worse than it had ever been before. I swear it felt as responsive as my old days with a 386 felt. My Vista partition on the same machine feels very snappy, in fact as responsive as Win95 feels on a P4. Not surprising, as the windows "experience index" showed 5.8, which, I gather, is a pretty good number. Anyways, every upgrade since then has been worse, and due to forced obsolescence, such as minimum requirements for an application, where there was no good reason for having to make the upgrade, other than due to the compiler they chose to use. Every upgrade since 10.6 has introduced more bugs, incompatibilities, etc. I get that Apple doesn't like Java. But so what? I need it online. Why disable everybody's choice? Java now does not work at all online. Apps I bought not that long ago, are now useless. I get crashes again that bring down the whole PC, again. 8 gigs of memoryisn't even enough for the newest versions of OSX. If you think this comment is long you should see my list of all the thingts rthat were changed for chang's sakle, or functions that have been removed altogether. Did you know you no longer can even choose to do a search for *either* file name OR contemnts?. And because they have an extremely closed attitude to their programming, no third party tweaks appear any more. And soo much more wrong. The reason I wrote such a long comment is to show I am not a "mindless" Apple hater. I supported them for many many years. , and it is their current completrely disrespectful ,arrogant, inefficiently coded, and poorly thought out attitude to their desktop OS (all recent traits that never would have appeared in the Jobs era) that raised my hackles., and I haven't even gone into the iMac graphics bug...Their attitude towards their devices is, also, I see, rubbing a lot of poeople the wrong way. Currently, however, I am willing to give all one more "good old college try" with Mavericks 'Nuff said..

  145. Apple Community Forum commenters are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just commenting the wrong way. If they would just comment the right way as our dear lord Steve originally intended, then these problems wouldn't arise.

  146. Your holding it wrong. by lbanting · · Score: 1

    You are just holding it wrong! It seems that apple is the Big Brother that they were against in the commercial in 1984.

  147. Apple keeps deleting my post too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep trying to get help on their support forum, but they are deleting my post over and over. Here it is:

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, Netscape will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even BBEdit Lite is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 300 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.

    Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

  148. Re:Another day, another anti-Apple story by Meski · · Score: 1

    No, but we get bored with it. (not of)

  149. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Meski · · Score: 1

    It differentiates their brand. Re the design, they got fairly good marks for the actual output regulation, compared to most (but HP, kudos to us for that)

    http://www.righto.com/2012/10/a-dozen-usb-chargers-in-lab-apple-is.html

  150. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf is it with you people? Lose and loose are not interchangeable!

  151. Re: Another day, another anti-Apple story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've always had a good sarcasm detector.

  152. Streisand Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's wifi glitches are as old as the 802.11 protocol itself, and they've always covered them up with cloak-and-dagger. OS X wifi was buggy in Lion, and the "fix" in Mountain Lion made it even worse. The college kids working the Genius Bar have been holding the company line that "it must be the router". Now that censorship is involved, we have a slashdot story and a scandal. The Streisand Effect has been well documented. In the age of digital reproduction, censorship just plain doesn't work anymore. It didn't work for Barbara, it didn't work against Wikileaks, and it sure as hell isn't going to work for crApple. Some PR manager in Cupertino is probably--hopefully--losing his job right now.

    As a former IT manager at a "mac shop" iOS development company, this story surprises me... not at all.

  153. Re:Hello Streisand. Welcome to the spotlight. by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    So now everyone on /. knows

    Oh gosh. Now Slashdot knows. You do realize that, while a decade ago that meant something, now it's meaningless. There aren't enough eyeballs here anymore to Slashdot an IIS4 server running on a 128bps fractional T1. Okay, maybe if it was running NT 3.5.1.