Slashdot Mirror


Dyn.com Ends Free Dynamic DNS

First time accepted submitter mkitchin (1285710) writes in with news about Dyn ending its free DNS service. "For the last 15 years, all of us at Dyn have taken pride in offering a free version of our Dynamic DNS Pro product. What was originally a product built for a small group of users has blossomed into an exciting technology used around the world. That is why with mixed emotions we announced the end of that free hostname program today, officially turning down on May 7th."

173 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. You cancel service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then sign me up for a pay service! I love being canceled on!

    1. Re:You cancel service? by bobbied · · Score: 5, Informative

      I smell a business opportunity... Or, perhaps not.

      Having used Dyndns for nearly a decade, I'm sad to see it go pay only. Can't say I'm surprised. I figured this was on the way when they went to this - you have to log in each month or we delete your two free host names - that they where just trying to get us all to pay. Problem is, I really cannot see paying $25/year for the services they provide.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:You cancel service? by YukariHirai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm also sad to see it go pay only, and have been using it for quite some years. But I figure... well, considering how much I spend on everything else technology and internet, $25 a year isn't going to kill me.

    3. Re:You cancel service? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      yeah but at 25 bucks / year you might just as well get something real...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:You cancel service? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eh, They cancelled my account years ago after my router screwed up and started sending them updates to them as fast as it could. They thought it was a DOS attempt or something. It was really just my US Robotics DSL modem telling me it wanted to be set on fire and then smashed into small pieces. But, I understood their decision.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    5. Re:You cancel service? by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      $25/year gives you 32 changeable names.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:You cancel service? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      It was really just my US Robotics DSL modem telling me it wanted to be set on fire and then smashed into small pieces.

      Lol!!!

      In my case, I've been using them for the better part of the past 5 years...like others, I knew the writing was on the wall when they started that login crap. I've in fact only used them sparingly in any case, as some time ago I just began using a domain name I'd purchased and my own DNS server. Not surprised they're finally taking the free offering away.

    7. Re:You cancel service? by Redmancometh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used them a very long time ago, and recently tried to use them for a project. I ended up just using records from one of my domains, and using a little magic to compensate for the dynamic IP.

      My observation was that they've made it harder and harder to actually set up the free service. Every click involved trying to sell me something. It was as bad or worse about "upselling" than godaddy.

    8. Re:You cancel service? by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

      I'm replying because I modded the parent wrong, and this is the only way I know to delete a mod. I'm sorry!

    9. Re:You cancel service? by ncc74656 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had donated at some point in the past, it looks like you get grandfathered in. From the email they sent me:

      In an effort to better service our customers through increased support and a cleaner network, Dyn announced that in the next 30 days, we will no longer be supporting free hostnames. However, because you believed in us and supported this company through your donations, we are continuing to fulfill our promise to you: your service is still free for life.

      I donated somewhere around $10-$20 once, probably at least a decade ago.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:You cancel service? by augahyde · · Score: 2

      yeah but at 25 bucks / year you might just as well get something real...

      What is something real? A permanent IP address, i.e. business class service, costs far more than $25. I just checked with Comcast recently and it started around $60 per month. And if you want cable TV, you cannot have DVR with business class service.

    11. Re:You cancel service? by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      And my .com/.net/.org domain (that costs less than $25/year) gets me an infinite number of changeable names. I simply set the TTL on the subdomains low and update it whenever the IPs change.

    12. Re:You cancel service? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I thought it went away years ago! I tried to sign up, and eventually went to no-ip... I still use them for free, but several clients I have referred have paid. Dyn lost that business...

    13. Re:You cancel service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No-IP is a great free dynamic DNS alternative http://noip.co/1jVi5th

    14. Re:You cancel service? by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      I remember donating something like $20-30 back in 2001. I still use the service in 2014.

    15. Re:You cancel service? by hodet · · Score: 1

      I have a small VPS that hosts a personal website. My home Linux box just does an http get with curl to a secret html file on the VPS webserver. Then I generate an html file every hour that reads the access_log and uses a script to genereate a web page that displays my home IP I can access. Has worked fine for me for quite some time. My IP rarely changes and I can just update my hostfile if I don't want to use my IP directly.

      There are probably more elegant solutions but since I am the only one using it it's fine and I can't justify paying anything when I already have a perfectly good VPS I can leverage.

    16. Re:You cancel service? by hodet · · Score: 1

      Nice writing, holy crap. I meant;

      Then I use a script to read the access_log and generate a web page with my home IP every hour.

    17. Re:You cancel service? by Clith · · Score: 1

      My static IP costs me $4/month at TekSavvy on top of my regular ISP charges.

      --
      [ReidNews]
    18. Re:You cancel service? by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      Comcast IPs only change every 6 months - 1 yr+ as it is.

    19. Re:You cancel service? by Krojack · · Score: 1

      So either $48/year for a static IP or $25/year for dyn.com.... I guess it comes down to what you're using it for and how much you really are willing to spend.

    20. Re:You cancel service? by dysmal · · Score: 2

      Godaddy... Godaddy... Hrmmm.. Weren't they in the news for something internet related?

      http://godaddyboycott.org/

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/12/29/2053252/wikipedia-to-dump-godaddy-over-sopa

    21. Re:You cancel service? by kcwebmonkey · · Score: 2

      I switched over to http://freedns.afraid.org/ after they started requiring you to log in monthly and haven't looked back since.

    22. Re:You cancel service? by kcwebmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      No-IP is a great free dynamic DNS alternative http://noip.co/1jVi5th

      their free service also requires you to sign in every month. I'd suggest a service like http://freedns.afraid.org/ which is completely free and doesn't require monthly logins to keep your account active.

    23. Re:You cancel service? by thesupraman · · Score: 2

      are you *really* trying to compare a service at $25/year with a service at $35/month?

      I think you have missed an important part of the comparison..

    24. Re:You cancel service? by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Meh, I've spent more on things that are less real and ultimately less useful. At the bottom line, this is a service they are providing. Not all services - very few if any, in fact - result in your gaining a physical object.

    25. Re:You cancel service? by augahyde · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they are Canada only. Given that Comcast is the largest ISP in the US, they are a relevant source for me to point to. Business Class service is the only way to get a static IP address with Comcast and that starts at USD 69.95 per month plus another USD 14.95 per month for the static IP address.

    26. Re:You cancel service? by kko · · Score: 1

      I once foolishly paid dyndns for some sort of very long term (lifetime? I cannot remember) dyndns account. That service went away, and I got left with just their free tier of service. Then they started with the "you must log in every x amount of time" thing. At this point, I got DNS subdomains on shtuff running in DigitalOcean, and it makes not a lot of sense to run things at home.

      tl;dr At this point in my life I don't even need dyndns. But thanks for all the fish, at the same time, dyndns.

      --
      No, seriously, I just come here for the articles.
    27. Re:You cancel service? by KritonK · · Score: 1

      This happened to me once, too. I wrote to them, explaining what had happened, and they promptly restored my account, no questions asked.

    28. Re:You cancel service? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Meh, it was the same for me. I just switched to one of the many other free services that're just as good... I don't understand why Dyn think that they're going to be able to charge money for what everyone else offers for free :S

  2. Alternatives by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Informative

    A quick search reveals http://www.noip.com/, and I'm sure they'll be more. Anyway isn't this supposed to be a stopgap before IPV6 means we can all have permanent static IPS?!

    1. Re:Alternatives by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Permanent static IPs sound like a privacy nightmare, anyway.

      but think of the time it will save the NSA

    2. Re:Alternatives by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Considering Dyn bought several promised "free for life" DNS services then promptly killed them you need to realize they'll probably do it again. They've apparently decided the best business model is buy out their free competitors and put them out business.

    3. Re:Alternatives by BenFranske · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it's not very slashdot-like to do some research before posting but if you're not familiar with IPv6 please do yourself a favor and check it out thoroughly before spreading FUD. Yes, IPs are (most frequently) tied to MAC addresses _BUT_ you almost always will have 3 IPv6 addresses... a link-local address for communication just on the local subnet, a globally public one tied to your MAC (which you can distribute to people who you WANT to reach you), and a global public "temporary" IP address which you can use for outgoing connections but which will change periodically and will not be tied to your MAC. Of course this all depends a little on your IPv6 stack in your OS but this is how it's typically being handled.

    4. Re:Alternatives by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That was fixed, what, five years ago? Please find a new troll.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Alternatives by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      For link-local addresses, which only work on your LAN. This obviates the need for ARP (there is no ARP in IPv6).

      For any service which requires access to the outside world, you'll get a routable IP over (say) DHCP.

    6. Re:Alternatives by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      They already have your MAC address anyway if you are sending packets to them. The address is only valid on the link.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    7. Re:Alternatives by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most ISPs don't change your IP on a regular basis anyway, so IP-based tracking narrows you down to a residential connection already. IPv6 is actually better in this regard because most implementation (yes, including Windows) let you keep a single static IP (or more than one) that you use for publicly advertised services but then regularly cycle IPs for outbound connections. This is something that most network stacks let you tune, but at the extreme case you can use a new IP for every new outbound connection (I think the default is a new one every 2 hours for most systems). This doesn't help much if you're the only user on a residential connection, but it makes tracking a lot harder if that's on something like a university campus.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Alternatives by psychonaut · · Score: 3, Informative

      With No-IP's free service, host names expire every 30 days. I imagine this will be rather inconvenient for many people, even if all that's required to prevent the expiry is to log into your account (as Dyn.com has required for the past year or so).

    9. Re:Alternatives by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what they did to the service that I used (and made fair donations to annually) for years: everydns.net.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    10. Re:Alternatives by radiumsoup · · Score: 2

      so you're saying someone could take the vacuum of service this opportunity generates to make a free dynamic DNS service, and once it hits a certain subscriber number, sell it to Dyn.com, then rinse, repeat?

      Sounds like a plan.

    11. Re:Alternatives by Enfixed · · Score: 1

      Been using No-IP for years, love those guys!

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    12. Re:Alternatives by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Yea welcome to the club, there are 700K of us.

    13. Re:Alternatives by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I already had an alternative for years: my ISP. It has this free service where you login with your account, and pick [chosenname].go.ro - and that's it. Of course, some might consider it as rather limited but I think its more than fitting for a home user.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    14. Re:Alternatives by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Considering Dyn bought several promised "free for life" DNS services then promptly killed them you need to realize they'll probably do it again. They've apparently decided the best business model is buy out their free competitors and put them out business.

      I'm one of those that got an account when they bought out EveryDNS. They committed to keeping it free for life (but charged $5 for the "transition").

      I'm actually a little confused by this announcement. I got an email from them this morning about it, but very little information. They included this in mine:

      However, because you believed in us and supported this company through your donations, we are continuing to fulfill our promise to you: your service is still free for life.

      Not sure what this means for me. I do have what I think they are referring to, a free hostname in the "from-va.com" domain. I don't really use it much, so I don't care if it goes away. But I've also got 2 of my own domains that I use their DNS services for. I'm assuming that will continue to work, and for no new fees. I better be right, or I'll be raising some hell.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    15. Re:Alternatives by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      So... I've just come up with an awesome idea for a business model...

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    16. Re:Alternatives by jittles · · Score: 3, Informative

      A quick search reveals http://www.noip.com/, and I'm sure they'll be more. Anyway isn't this supposed to be a stopgap before IPV6 means we can all have permanent static IPS?!

      I've been using ZoneEdit for a long time. They've changed their business model slightly. Don't know if they still offer as many free options any more, but they have been great for me for over 10 years now!

    17. Re:Alternatives by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Not sure what ISP you're using, but I haven't had one in the past 5 years or so that recycled my IP. Even over long down times (up to a day or two as I recall), the IP I was reissued was still the same.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    18. Re:Alternatives by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      MAC addresses are changeable. Thanks to Digital for forcing that option, IIRC :)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    19. Re:Alternatives by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      They are by default, but there is the IPv6 privacy extension RFC4941. Also if you use DHCPv6, then you can decide exactly what IP each host gets.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    20. Re:Alternatives by augahyde · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that your provider will offer static IP addressing? This is one way to distinguish residential from business users. Comcast has already stated that they will support both dynamic and static (for a fee, I'm sure) IPv6 addresses.

    21. Re:Alternatives by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Just host your ready-to-sell dynamic DNS service on AWS, and you can bring up new ones the day you sell the old one. :)

    22. Re:Alternatives by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Me too... Ever since Dyn made it too hard to use them. Frankly, it was so hard to find that I thought the free service was already gone.

    23. Re:Alternatives by Mirar · · Score: 1

      This. I'm confused as well. And I never knew about their "free hostname" stuff.

    24. Re:Alternatives by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Anyway isn't this supposed to be a stopgap before IPV6 means we can all have permanent static IPS?!

      You think your ISP is going to give you static IPs for free just because they have an IPv6 pool to dive into? Chances are it will still be DHCP and rotate occasionally. And the fee an ISP charges for static IP is more per year than paying for a dynamic DNS service.

    25. Re:Alternatives by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      With No-IP's free service, host names expire every 30 days.

      They only expire if you're too lazy to visit their website for three minutes to do a captcha when they send you the email saying your domain is about to expire. I've been doing it for months and have had uninterrupted service.

    26. Re:Alternatives by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      A quick search reveals http://www.noip.com/ [noip.com], and I'm sure they'll be more

      No-IP is dishonest and doesn't deserve your support.

      Way back in mid 2004 I spent about $20 to buy No-IP's "Lifetime" dynamic DNS service which gave me (IIRC) 5 of their "enhanced" subdomains which would never expire and never cost me additional money. I was very happy with them and recommended them to several people.

      Then suddenly in 2008 I got an email saying my service was about to expire. When I emailed them about it, they said:

      Date: Mar 10, 2008 (1:18am PDT)
      From: No-IP Support

      3 months after you had completed this purchase, this service was changed to a yearly service. As a courtesy to existing users, we provided them with 3 years of service. I'm sorry for any confusion this caused with the renewal of your service.

      I don't really care what sneaky leagalese was in their TOS that justifies them legally. They explicitly sold this service as "lifetime", and I feel this was a completely underhanded move. I've had nothing to do with No-IP ever since and I discourage everyone else from supporting that kind of dishonestly.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    27. Re:Alternatives by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      >You think your ISP is going to give you static IPs for free just because they have an IPv6 pool to dive into?

      Probably actually. It's way easier to manage that way. It also solves tons of problems. Assign a /64 /60 or /something small to a customer and if 'they' fuck it up it doesn't effect all the other users. They probably won't be static in the way you think they are, but tied to the MAC of the CPE.

    28. Re:Alternatives by udippel · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Only if no client contacts their servers.
      And I did that for almost 2 years until I got a client installed to update the zone file regularly, and now this requirement is gone.

    29. Re:Alternatives by Cramer · · Score: 1

      It's not called ARP, but it does have the same mechanism... Neighbor Discovery. It's done via multicast, btw.

    30. Re:Alternatives by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Probably actually. It's way easier to manage that way. It also solves tons of problems.

      The problem is... that's also true of all always-on connections. The whole reason we got dynamic IPs in the first place is that a 300-line ISP only needed one IP per line, not one per customer. But an always-on broadband customer needs one IP per computer, and the only question is whether they're public or behind a NAT. IPv6 removes the need for NAT, but does not solve the "need" for a dynamic IP for a broadband customer since there never was one in the first place, except for greed. And, sadly, technology can't solve greed.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:Alternatives by Cramer · · Score: 1

      No, you will not have "permanent static [addresses]". Your IPv6 prefix will not be "yours"; it can (and very likely WILL) be just as dynamic as any IPv4 address today. (esp. since every US ISP I'm aware of is using DHCPv6-PD to hand out prefixes)

    32. Re:Alternatives by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I don't really care what sneaky leagalese was in their TOS that justifies them legally.

      What makes you think anything does? They marketed a lifetime service; while it's obvious that no one and nothing can guarantee it's going to live longer than you, it seems that No-IP is still around, so why not take them to small-claims court and demand your money back?

      They explicitly sold this service as "lifetime", and I feel this was a completely underhanded move.

      And it is. So, even if the TOS actually does legalize this kind of thing, it's entirely possible that you might get yours back by pointing out this fraudulent advertising. Perhaps you could see if you can get a class-action lawsuit going - you can't be the only victim?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:Alternatives by alexo · · Score: 1

      How do I I use the noip service to manage hosts in my domain, where the domain DNS is not managed by noip?

      Let's say that the DNS server for mydomain.example is my registrar, who does not support dynamic DNS
      and I want mycomputer.mydomain.example to be dynamically managed by noip.

      I could not find this option on noip's web site.

    34. Re:Alternatives by WhatAreYouDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I looked at noip ... and eventually settled on dynu.com today after getting dyndns' email. Actually I looked at a little comparison article here http://www.gnutomorrow.com/bes...

      --
      "What are you doing here, Elijah?"
    35. Re:Alternatives by LihTox · · Score: 1

      I already had an alternative for years: my ISP. It has this free service where you login with your account, and pick [chosenname].go.ro - and that's it. Of course, some might consider it as rather limited but I think its more than fitting for a home user.

      This really is the sort of service all ISPs should provide.

    36. Re:Alternatives by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In IPv6, the minimum you'd get is a /64, in which case, you can define how many of those 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses are static, how many dynamic and so on. Comcast wouldn't get any say in that, unless they got to manage your addresses. Besides, residential users who'd like to have a website and so on could easily make one or more of those addresses static, and use it to host various services.

    37. Re:Alternatives by unixisc · · Score: 1

      One can get a prefix directly from ARIN. There is this concept now of provider-independent addresses, where an organization can get a fixed prefix permanently allotted to them. Once they have that, they'll have all the IP addresses they'd ever need. Only thing they need to solve - how to get different locations w/ maybe different ISPs working w/ that single range of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses.

    38. Re:Alternatives by qubezz · · Score: 1

      Most don't change your IP address capriciously, but some do. Some ISPs, such as Centurylink DSL (Qwest) aggressively change IP with every DHCP renew or PPPoE session, specifically to frustrate users into paying more for a static IP address to run any kind of service that expects that a response should return to the same IP address a few minutes later.

      This particular scumbag company has also tried to ace out other DSL Internet providers by limiting them to 7mbps while selling their own ISP service at 20mbps+.

    39. Re:Alternatives by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      I also donated to everydns.net, and I used them for years.
      Then Dyn bought them, made a big show of keeping the everydns promise to us. "It'll always be free".
      Then they asked for money, I think it was $10, which I paid.

      I have them on a few domains, and they have kept my free acct active after I paid them.
      The token payment was to separate the slackers from those that were willing to pay at least a little, which meant you were still actually using the service.
      I am sure it wasn't the money.

      Dyn does have a history of buying their free competitors. To get rid of them.
      One thing about them, they are not nice guys. Not at all.

      --
      .
    40. Re:Alternatives by Cramer · · Score: 1

      And how does this matter at all to the millions of residential users? You, know, the people who don't get static addresses.

    41. Re:Alternatives by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Lots of services have claimed that over history. A certain PHP bulletin board that now costs $199 with $40/yr renewals, Reflector .NET Decompiler (now $95, plus extra for every version or $199 for the "Pro" version), etc.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  3. Viable Replacement? by krept · · Score: 2

    Anyone have a recommended replacement service?

    --
    None of us know everything. Therefore we're all naïve.
    1. Re:Viable Replacement? by c4t3l · · Score: 5, Insightful

      afraid.org?? They are decent.

    2. Re:Viable Replacement? by Rinisari · · Score: 2

      Since my primary usage of their service is to access my array of routers at networks I control, I plan on using one of these alternatives if DNSimple, where I have a paid account, doesn't implement dyndns support in the next 30 days:

      http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/ind...

    3. Re:Viable Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      dyndns.org
      freedns.afraid.org
      no-ip.com
      zoneedit.com
      3322.org
      easydns.com
      tzo.com
      dynsip.org

      They are all pretty much the same as far as I care.

    4. Re:Viable Replacement? by elerran · · Score: 5, Informative

      Been very happy with https://freedns.afraid.org/ ever since dyndns deleted my free domain because I didn't login to their website once a month.

    5. Re:Viable Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just switched from dyndns to afraid.com.
      Fairly pain free, with the exception of having to update my ddclient to the latest version, and then running into a bug in ddclient (the freedns protocol handler in ddclient v3.8.2 must have username in all lowercase).

    6. Re:Viable Replacement? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I've been happy with ChangeIP for several years now, ever since Dyn started their pushy shenanigans.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Viable Replacement? by robmv · · Score: 4, Funny

      dyndns.org

      Recursion found!

    8. Re:Viable Replacement? by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      dyndns.org

      dyndns.org is dyn.com, so that won't help. That being said, they do offer paid services for more or less a couple dollars a month if you're attached to their featureset or something.

      --
      R.Mo
    9. Re:Viable Replacement? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 5, Informative

      Been very happy with https://freedns.afraid.org/ ever since dyndns deleted my free domain because I didn't login to their website once a month.

      This happened to me as well; I used to use dyndns but I lost my domain when they switched the domain I had been using to a "premium" one so then I had to go and reconfigure everything that depended on it to a new domain so after looking at some other alternatives I ultimately decided to use EntryDNS with my own domain I bought from GoDaddy.

      EntryDNS is donation driven and doesn't have any of the bull I found at over services (login once a month, upgrade to premium spam, link back to their site, etc..) and you have both the option of using a free subdomain and/or using your own domain. I've been very happy with their service and am considering donating something as a token of appreciation.

    10. Re:Viable Replacement? by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      I moved away from them to DNS Exit after finding out that Afraid's default setup was to let anyone create a subdomain on your domain.

      DNSExit isn't without their issues, though. If you don't want to use your DNS client, they have an HTTP updater. Unfortuantely, it's unencrypted and you need to put your password in as a "GET" parameter. Ugh!

    11. Re:Viable Replacement? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and disingenuousness. They say they are ending the free service because there is too much abuse. Google, Yahoo, MS, and others can still offer free email, despite all the spam, but Dyn can't continue the free version of a service that is much simpler and easier to manage than email? And, wasn't there plenty of abuse 5 years ago, 10 years ago? They could handle it then, and now they can't?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    12. Re:Viable Replacement? by Enfixed · · Score: 1

      Go for No-IP. Been using them for years, personal and business. Exceedingly fast and their techs are awesome when you do have an off the wall issue. (Not affiliated with them in any way)

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    13. Re:Viable Replacement? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Let's see...an email service that spams you and blasts ads while you are reading emails every day vs a DNS service you set up and pretty much forget about except when it doesn't work or you need to change something. Yeah...loads of income potential there.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    14. Re:Viable Replacement? by macraig · · Score: 1

      Been using afraid.org for years after dyndns.org cancelled my account because I bitched at them about something stupid/selfish they did. Apparently stupid/selfish is par for the course with those people, so I'm glad I was an early emigre.

    15. Re:Viable Replacement? by rotaryexpress · · Score: 4, Informative

      Free Dynamic DNS is fine but....
      I've used Namecheap.com for my personal domain for a few years now and recently found out you can do dynamic DNS with them too. I realize it's not free, but, it's my own domain on a service I'm paying for. It's nice having house.(mydomain).com...

    16. Re:Viable Replacement? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      Nobody uses Zonomi?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    17. Re:Viable Replacement? by drafalski · · Score: 1

      I've been very happy with their service and am considering donating something as a token of appreciation.

      Consideration should help get their bills paid...

    18. Re:Viable Replacement? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't really care one way or another. From my perspective, they promised "free forever" and for a while they delivered. Then they started down the annoying their users path and I fled. If they held some kind of monopoly I'd be a lot more worked up, but there are plenty of alternatives.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Viable Replacement? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      5 to 10 years ago most routers and NAS didnt come with Dyn support.

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re:Viable Replacement? by Spoke · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this. For way less than the price of what Dyn charges for DNS service, you can get your own domain name AND dynamic DNS service.

      All with a company that doesn't try to screw you over every year, too.

    21. Re:Viable Replacement? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      I've been very happy with their service and am considering donating something as a token of appreciation.

      Consideration should help get their bills paid...

      I need to consider how much I can afford to donate and when I can fit it into my budget taking into account bills and other things I need to pay for.

      consider
      verb: consider; 3rd person present: considers; past tense: considered; past participle: considered; gerund or present participle: considering
      1. think carefully about (something), typically before making a decision.
      "each application is considered on its merits"
      synonyms: think about, contemplate, reflect on, examine, review; More

    22. Re:Viable Replacement? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Have they always had that "30-day expiration" or is that new? That is -quite- annoying.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Viable Replacement? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You have to use their nameservers.

      I'd love to use this, but I run my own and would prefer to continue doing so.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    24. Re:Viable Replacement? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Well in this business climate where "Unlimited" means whatever the legalese in the fine print says it is and is subject to change I'm not the least bit surprised forever is getting the same treatment.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    25. Re:Viable Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3322 is gone, taken down for hosting malware.
      EasyDNS and DynDNS are the same service the article is about.
      TZO requires payment, likewise ZoneEdit.

      You just copy-pasted the services your router supports, didn't you.

    26. Re:Viable Replacement? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Or go with some place like DNSMadeEasy where you get even more features for a flat $30/yr.

      Their corporate pricing is a little ridiculous at $1500/yr, but the Small Business and regular Business plans are pretty good. Especially if you want geographically distributed DNS servers.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    27. Re:Viable Replacement? by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I use Namecheap and didn't know about this feature.
      Now I can stop answering the no-ip emails every month.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    28. Re:Viable Replacement? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      I've had problems with afraid.org where a privately registered domain I held allowed other people to create their own hostnames in that domain. These hostnames were then used to spread malware with the result that I was receiving notices from Google saying my web site was compromised.

      I had, say, www.example.com and then others were making asd34ghjb5fbs.example.com and using that to spread malware. Google saw that I owned example.com and so I received the notifications. I'd log into afraid.org and shut down all the hostnames that I didn't create, but they kept getting made even though I had private registration on my domain name.

    29. Re:Viable Replacement? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Yep, I found that too. I had a privately registered domain with afraid.org that still allowed other people to create their own hostnames in that domain. These hostnames were then used to spread malware with the result that I was receiving notices from Google saying my web site was compromised.

      I had, say, www.example.com and then others were making asd34ghjb5fbs.example.com and using that to spread malware. Google saw that I owned example.com and so I received the notifications. I'd log into afraid.org and shut down all the hostnames that I didn't create, but they kept getting made even though I had private registration on my domain name.

    30. Re:Viable Replacement? by macraig · · Score: 1

      I found myself in a similar questionable situation once, and afraid.org helped me block/undo that subdomain when I explained my suspicion. They're responsive. Also, I dunno if it's default but you can be notified of each subdomain request and require explicit approval; that is how I learned of the questionable one in the first place.

    31. Re:Viable Replacement? by alexo · · Score: 1

      How do use mycomputer.mydomain.example on afraid.org where mydomain.example is a domain I own, without advertising the domain on their system?
      The "stealth" option is not available for free.

    32. Re:Viable Replacement? by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      You can do dynamic updates with BIND or windows DNS. There are perl modules to do it or you can run one of several possible command line utilities to update the ip address.

      When I was still in college, I had a cluster of machines that I used for building packages for my BSD project. They were behind a NAT, but I had SSH access to them only they were also on DHCP. I setup a script that ran periodically on them to send their current IP address to a public facing website I ran and logged the IP to a mysql database. Then I had another process that would update the dns record securely after some sanity checking if the IP changed. I didn't want the nodes to have the update key for my DNS server and that's why I went through the crazy intermediate script + database.

    33. Re:Viable Replacement? by klui · · Score: 1

      I got an account to afraid.org several days ago. I thought as an owner of a private domain, you are allowed to reject the subdomains before they can be active. Isn't this so?

    34. Re:Viable Replacement? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Yes, I thought that was the case, but I still got all sorts of junk subdomains registered... Maybe there was a problem with the way my domains were registered, I don't know. Either way, I moved them away...

    35. Re:Viable Replacement? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great, but some routers' built-in support is locked to dyndns.org. I can recall a belkin G from half a decade ago, still in use by a friend. Maybe that's been fixed, but he'll need to shell out cash to fix something that should never have been hardcoded. At least dd-wrt doesn't have this problem.

      It doesn't have to be the actual router that makes the updates, since the dynamic DNS record simply points to your public IP, not to a specific machine on your side. My router doesn't support Dynamic DNS services at all. It's the FreeNAS server that's running on it that calls in to no-ip.com to update my record. The router just forwards the incoming requests to the correct machine on the network by port number.

    36. Re:Viable Replacement? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Because I want a third-party to do that part, such that when my bind/apache box is down, I can still get to my shit?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    37. Re:Viable Replacement? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Amazon Route 53?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  4. Their basic service is only $25 / year by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know it sucks to see something go from free to not free, but a while ago I upped by agreement with them from free service to their most basic level. For me its worth the $25 per year. Others may feel otherwise, and their may be cheaper solutions out there as well, but it works pretty well for me.

    I also like that someone wrote an auto-update utility (ddclient in FreeBSD) that I can run on my webserver as a daemon to keep my records updated should my ISP change my address on me.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      Part of the problem is some devices that offer dynamic DNS updaters (routers in particular) only support the DynDNS service.

    2. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

      Why spend $25 when you can get an even better and likely shorter domain form something like godaddy or domain.com for about $8 a year for a .com?

      You can use http://freedns.afraid.org/ to make your .com work with a dynamic IP too and that's free.

    3. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Because $25/year doesn't give me one dynamic IP name, it gives me 32.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

      Oh OK. If you need more than 1, then that's a fine deal. Personally I use subdomains (which are basically unlimited) for that kind of task with my domain, but that isn't what everyone wants I guess.

    5. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      But I only want dynamic DNS. I don't want or need anything else, so I don't want to pay for them.

      Unfortunately they don't seem to have a "just dyndns" package.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Their basic service is only $25 / year by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      "Remote Access has you covered with the ability to create up to 30 hostnames (yourname.dyndns.org)"

      So, no it gives you 30. Since they are subdomains of dyndns.org if you register your own domain name you'll have way more than just 30....

  5. Plenty of Alternatives by dannydawg5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dyn has been abandoning the free service for a while. Companies are responding to this.

    The IP cams and routers I've bought in the past couple years (Foscam and ASUS) have rolled their own dynamic DNS service and built it in to their product. They use to just use Dyn until their customers started complaining saying Dyn is no longer free.

    I have not needed Dyn's service in a while.

    1. Re:Plenty of Alternatives by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yeah 'the roll their own service' is shitty as hell, just ask LG

      --
      Good-bye
  6. Still free for life for donors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I made a donation back in the 90's so I still get my lifetime free vip account.

    Other alternatives sell your e-mail address to spammers so beware! I'd use a junk e-mail account.

  7. Another case for open source firmware. by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Looks like I'm going to My netgear router to tomato or dd-wrt
    The current software has a dynamic dns setting, but it's a dropdown and Dyn DNS is the ONLY option. I hope they release a new firmware relaxing this restriction, but I have not seen any updates in a few years for my model.

    Effectively, they are taking away functionality that I have already paid for. Sony did this when they made us choose between PSN (and effectively any internet communication) or Custom Operating System, changing the terms of our original purchase.

    Thank god for open source. But, I wasn't looking forward to this side-quest. I'm sick of things I own ceasing to work just because some external entity wishes to make it so.

    1. Re:Another case for open source firmware. by zerro · · Score: 2

      "Effectively, they are taking away functionality that I have already paid for."

      You mean to say that you already paid DynDNS for service? If so, I dont see how this affects you, as you are a paying customer.
      If you are talking about something you paid to a hardware/software company for a router which had dyndns feature - generating value for the said router vendor, but no revenue for dyndns - I'm not sure I understand the fairness in your argument.

  8. People were still using them? by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dyn.com (the for-profit successor of dyndns.org) has been progressively making it harder to maintain your free address for the past 3 or 4 years. First, they made it so you had to update your DNS record once a month to avoid being cancelled (even if your IP address didn't change in that time), then they made it so you had to submit the update through their ad-infested web page, and I think they also increased the frequency that you had to do that. There are many alternatives which still provide a free service that is convenient to use, I'd have thought most users would have switched by now.

    1. Re:People were still using them? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I guess I was lucky, in that I was using some indirection which made it easier to switch. From the start, I had my own domain, which was aliased to a dyndns.org domain (actually thruhere.net). I lost that when my update script missed the deadline for some reason, and they'd already moved that domain away from their free offerings so I couldn't get the same address back. I made the switch then, and only had to update my alias and wait a couple of hours for that to propagate. Given that I generally manage to keep the same IP address for 2 - 3 months at a time, I could manually update the IP address if it came to that, but it is easier to have a script to take care of the updating.

    2. Re:People were still using them? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      First, they made it so you had to update your DNS record once a month to avoid being cancelled

      For the record, the first impediment I encountered was requiring a valid credit card to establish a free account.

      15 years..... some of the users they're trying to monetize weren't born when dyndns started this deal.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  9. Effectively ended last year by mastagee · · Score: 1

    This has been a few years in the making -- DynDNS started killing free hostnames that failed to check in within 30 days last June (maybe before?). I suppose you could sign up again, but they also removed a variety of domain names you could choose from. I lost my long held domain with a ath.cx suffix due to forgetting to confirm my dyndns login info after a DDwrt update.

    I moved to Hurricane Electric a few years back as my primary dynamic DNS. They'll host your DNS for a domain you own for free, including dynamic update support. he.net

  10. Free Dyn.com account with D-Link routers by psychonaut · · Score: 1

    Routers manufactured by D-Link come with their own free dynamic DNS service, which is basically farmed out to Dyn.com. I don't see any mention on the Dyn.com or D-Link websites that they're discontinuing this service, so presumably if you've got a D-Link router you can still create a free Dyn.com account with it.

  11. changeip.com by shellster_dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use changeip.com. They provide great, free service, and I don't have to constantly "renew" the service.

  12. Some ISP's offer free domains by w-wright · · Score: 1

    If you have a Static IP with my ISP. You can have a domain name in the style of *.plus.com Do any other ISP's offer this?

    1. Re:Some ISP's offer free domains by Megane · · Score: 1

      If you have a static IP, you never needed dyndns to begin with. You could run your own DNS. (I have been since I first got DSL back in 2000.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  13. That's a shame. by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    I've been using my dyn.com domain for probably ten years now. Long enough that I don't actually remember when I originally signed up for it.

    Regrettably, they don't register the TLDs I use and it's not worth $25/year to keep a "something.ath.cx" domain.

    It was nice while it lasted, though.

    1. Re:That's a shame. by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

      That would have been hilarious and I wish I had thought of it.

  14. NOIP does the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    But dyn actually stopped sending the renewal emails, thus losing me my addresses, then turning out to have deleted those domains as available options for non-paying customers.

    That's when I ended my relationship with them and jumped to noip.

    After this though, I wonder how long util NOIP does the same.

    1. Re:NOIP does the same... by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      But dyn actually stopped sending the renewal emails, thus losing me my addresses, then turning out to have deleted those domains as available options for non-paying customers..

      Ah, so it wasn't just me then..

      I got the renewal email just a week ago or thereabouts.

    2. Re:NOIP does the same... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the conversion factor. What is the uptake of paid users from free accounts vs paid users outright?

  15. easy other solutions by HussamAl-Tayeb · · Score: 1

    Get a free .eu.org or .tk account, point it to cloudflare dns (also a free service) and point an A record to your own IP.

  16. Grandfathering existing free accounts or not? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    I have a free account from years and years ago. It still works as long as I visit a URL that they email once a month (of course, they deliberately make the URL unclickable, while there are other clickable URLs within the *same* email... seriously, guys, offer free or don't offer it, but don't be a dick about it)

    What TFA doesn't make clear is whether they are ending the grandfathering of existing free accounts or ending the offering of new free accounts (something I thought they already did a few years ago). The wording they've used is ambiguous.

    1. Re:Grandfathering existing free accounts or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's the email they sent to the free account holders:

      To our Dyn free hostname users:

      For the last 15 years, all of us at Dyn have taken pride in offering you and millions of others a free version of our Dynamic DNS Pro product. What was originally a product built for a small group of users has blossomed into an exciting technology used around the world.

      That is why with mixed emotions we are notifying you that in 30 days, we will be ending our free hostname program. This change in the business will allow us to invest in our customer support teams, Internet infrastructure, and platform security so that we can continue to strive to deliver an exceptional customer experience for our paying customers.

      We would like to invite you to upgrade to VIP status for a 25% discounted rate, good for any package of Remote Access (formerly DynDNS Pro). By doing so, you'll have access to customer support, additional hostnames, and more.

      Here's how you get this done in two easy steps:

      - Login to account.dyn.com.
      - Click here to add Remote Access to your cart at the 25% off VIP rate. The discount will be applied upon checkout.

      We thank you for your usage of Dyn through the years, and hope to continue to support you through Dyn Remote Access or other products for years to come. Please visit our FAQ page or this blog post for any additional information.

    2. Re:Grandfathering existing free accounts or not? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      So thats what people meant by their ' ad infested site'. The link in the email must take you to some ad dump, before letting you continue.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Grandfathering existing free accounts or not? by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

      I subscribed to their service at one point, and when I just logged in, I got an offer for something, but my service still shows up.

      I haven't gotten an email from them about my service ending period, so I dunno what will happen with me.

  17. Re:This doesn't even compare... by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Seriously, anybody who has the necessity to have a named, or fixed location on the WWW should not have a problem getting a fixed IP cheap by their ISP

    I'm in Asia. My ISP doesn't do static IPs anymore. I'm lucky I'm on one that isn't doing carrier-grade NAT, though I don't know how long that will last.

  18. Overvalued by SkunkPussy · · Score: 2

    The service they provide is worth about £1 or £2 a year.

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:Overvalued by rockmuelle · · Score: 1

      With all the comments about moving to other free services or using this as an opportunity to start a new business, what is the value for most people? If there are enough people that value it at a certain price such that the costs of running the business are covered, there's a business to be made. Otherwise, it's just charity on the service's part. Sure, everyone likes getting stuff for free, but even free stuff costs money for someone.

      -Chris

  19. only a 1st year fix by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    The providers that you mentioned will sell you a cheap domain name, but only for the first year. Then they want to jack up the price if you want to keep it. If you're only using the name yourself then I guess just changing domains every year might be acceptable, but in my case I have a number of friends who all connect through my Teamspeak server for gaming and it is disruptive to try to get all of them to change their settings (some are extremely non-technical and don't respond to instructions to change an address well).

    Looks like I'll try switching to an alternative free provider, at least until Dyndns buys them out or convinces them to start charging too.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:only a 1st year fix by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

      Well my first years was $5 (promo code) and the next 2 years have been $10 each so hardly much more expensive in my experience. So it's been $25 for 3 years so far through domain.com for nicko88.com for me.

  20. All because ISPs want to crosssell by houghi · · Score: 1

    At the time of dialup there was an ecuse to not have as many IP adresses as there were customers. Now there will be at least as many IP adresses as there are customers for an ISP. So having a fixed IP would be no problem.
    having a reversed DNS for your mail (on reqiuest) is also no a real issue.
    Goin g from dynamic to fixed DNS for providers should not be a serious issue on a technical level.

    However selling IP adresses is a very profitable business model. No investment (People need an IP adress anyway as they are already only 24/7) on the IP adresses. On the receiving end, just the billing system and you can ask almost anything.

    When comparing prices between fixed and non fixed IP in Belgium, the average difference was about 50EUR per IP adress. This only looking at the speed of the connection. non-fixed would also receive webspace, email accounts and the like.

    That is 50x12=600EUR per year for your IP without any additional investment on part of the ISP. When I asked several ISPs, they basically said: we get away with it so we do it.
    One admitted that having a fixed IP would be cheaper in opperation.

    Luckily I found a provider that has fixed IP and no limit for a reasonable price. Not the cheapest, but the best value for money for what I want.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  21. domain != dyndns by kevlar_rat · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a little confusion here. Dynamic DNS means the domain record is constantly updated to point to the correct IP address. Its completely independent of domain registration. godaddy does not offer a dyndns service. Most dyndns services do not offer domains.
    DynDNS is useful if you want to be able to always contact a box on a domain, but it's got a dynamic IP address - i.e. typically for running a server on a home box. I use it to ssh into home when I'm away, I just do ssh mydyndomain.org and don't need to worry about IP addresses.
    I have had domains with godaddy in the past, but I've always used dyn.com as well.
    It is possible to use a script to update your A record through your registrar's web interface, but this will break every time they update the site.
    P.S. I recommend not using godaddy.

    1. Re:domain != dyndns by Rufus+Firefly · · Score: 2
      Enom has an API to do this. It's trivial to set update your A record using it.

      But I agree, every time you use godaddy, baby Jesus kills a kitten.

    2. Re:domain != dyndns by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      freedns (freedns.afraid.org) offer free DNS hosting, including dynamic DNS. So just buy a domain, and use that. Still cheaper than $25/y.

  22. If you have Linode, then it is free ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    If you have a Linode VPS, then you do have free Dynamic DNS. All you need is a script to update the relevant subdomain.

    Here is a script that does it for an OpenWRT router.

    Using Linode Dynamic DNS with OpenWRT

    If you don't use OpenWRT, you can still use any Linux box behind the subdomain, but you need to setup a small "what is my IP" script outside your subdomain. For example, simple script like so will do the trick:

    <?php
    print $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] . "\n";
    ?>

    Now, you need to change the OpenWRT script above to contact the server that has the PHP script, and get the public IP address of the subdomain.

    1. Re:If you have Linode, then it is free ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Now, you need to change the OpenWRT script above to contact the server that has the PHP script, and get the public IP address of the subdomain.

      OpenWRT and DD-WRT and Tomato already have DynDNS support built in. No reason to setup a PHP and Apache server behind the router to do this.

      You still need a public-facing nameserver somewhere to update the DNS to IP address mapping. That's the key service that DynDNS was providing. Reporting your IP is the easy part.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:If you have Linode, then it is free ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      You did not understand what I said ...

      First, I was giving an example of how to get free Dynamic DNS if you already host with Linode. No extra service needed.

      Second, the script I described and included the source code for, runs on OpenWRT. Since OpenWRT is a router it does not need to run a remote script (PHP or otherwise) to know what its external IP address is.

      Finally, the PHP script was if you do not have OpenWRT, and want to have the equivalent functionality with Linode from a Linux machine that is not the router, inside your network. In this case, you need to get the external IP by running a script on your Linode VPS, then updating Linode's DNS using curl command.

      Clearer now?

  23. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you have ever sold a business like this, there is usually a 'no-compete' type condition for many years, usually a decade.

    1. Re:no by Wookact · · Score: 1

      So you have invalidated step 5. Steps 1-4 are still good though.

  24. duckdns.org by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    That is all.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  25. But there is probably a computer behind that routr by Marrow · · Score: 1

    And that computer can use any service you care to setup.

  26. Go Daddy has no dynamic DNS by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why spend $25 when you can get an even better and likely shorter domain form something like godaddy or domain.com for about $8 a year for a .com?

    The last time I checked, Go Daddy provided no API for a background service running on your server to update the zone file whenever the service notices that the server's IP address has changed. Zone files can be edited only through the web interface. With which registrar that provides such an API have you had a positive experience?

    1. Re:Go Daddy has no dynamic DNS by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

      I linked it before.

      https://freedns.afraid.org/dyn...

      They have a dynamic IP updater that you can use and so you can just set your nameservers on your godaddy domain to afraid's nameservers and then you will have dynamic IP on your godaddy or anyone else's domain.

  27. How does this effect Free For Life? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    How does this effect me as Free For Life user of dyndns?

    Because I still seem to be.

  28. Once the warranty runs out by tepples · · Score: 1

    In practice, "life" will likely end up limited to the 90 days or 12 months or whatever for which the product is expressly warranted.

  29. Saw this coming by solarium_rider · · Score: 1

    Saw this coming a long time ago (well at least 9 months ago). So...roll your own: http://warped.org/blog/2013/07...

    --
    -- How many sigs are as useless as this one?
  30. On the same note, by ledow · · Score: 1

    I'm a Dyn.com customer of old so I got an email to tell me that the promise to be "always free" back then holds for me, even if not for newer customers.

    But when I was looking for a more modern replacement, I was expecting to be able to set up a Dyn-compatible service for my old domains using an external Linux server. There doesn't seem to be anything easy for that.

    What I'd like is a Linux package which you can install on a server, and have it provide Dyn-like updating, without me having to play with BIND and all sorts (I don't do nameserving, so it's no particular fuss to install a nameserver JUST for this purpose). I thought DNSMasq might do it, as it's so powerful it tends to do everything, but that doesn't seem to offer it.

    And if it's Dyn.com compatible in the protocol it uses to accept reports from clients, it's just a matter of hacking in your IP instead of Dyn.com's. But I couldn't find anything that wasn't a case of "install this series of Perl scripts in such a way that they play with the internals of your existing, perfectly working BIND setup, and basically get called from web-requests with permissions enough to do just that".

    Anyone know of some software that works like the server-side of Dyn.com so I could host my own DynDNS service for my home accounts using a static, external server?

    1. Re:On the same note, by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Dyn.com pushes your IP address info out globally. So if you want a run-your-own replacement, you MUST have a working BIND installation. There's no other way to do it. Dyn.com was running a whole bunch of services that all map back to their BIND servers.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:On the same note, by ledow · · Score: 1

      1) Why only bind (it's not the only nameserver)?
      2) Why is there not a "install and go" version of it?

      Every tutorial I see starts with some huge parenthesised section of a bind zone and several scripts to manually update other bind files (like the comment a few below this one).

      Surely, if you're not caring about anything else on the domain you give it, there must be a zero-config version of it that saves someone having to cock up a bind installation.

    3. Re:On the same note, by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Because setting up a working BIND installation is a pain. Sure, there are alternative DNS servers, but BIND is the preferred choice on Linux.

      If there was a lot of demand for a click-and-go server and configuration, someone would have written it already. But then again, this is a big part of the Linux mindset. If tool A can be tweaked in a convoluted way to perform task B as a subset of its normal operations, then there's rarely incentive be build a dedicated tool for task B

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  31. I knew it was too good to be true by essbase_nerd · · Score: 1

    I was pretty good about noticing the "renewal" emails, but I knew it was just a matter of time before either I missed an email, or they terminated free service.

    I just bought a two year TLD from Namecheap, with WhoIsGuard service for $27 total. Not bad. There are a handful of DNS updater apps available for Namecheap, including a Chrome extension, so this should work out fine.

    So long, DynDNS, it was a great ride while it lasted!

  32. Bill Gates by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "Buy 'em out Boys!"

    Nerds smash up Homer Simpson's office

    "You don't think I got rich by *actually* buying people out did you?"

    sry, first thing that came to mind...

  33. No problem by DaveJ45 · · Score: 1

    Not a problem, I moved my free DNS services to No-IP a couple of years ago.

    --
    Differences between how you act when some one is watching, and how you act when no one is watching, define who you are
  34. To be expected. by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    Just for convenience, I have been a paying customer of Dyn for a couple of years, now.
    It is a sad end but it will not change my use of their services.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  35. Sad to see it go by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I transitioned to their "premier" pay service a while ago so this doesn't affect me, though I still know a lot of folks who have been using their free service.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  36. Re:the only thing sad is router support by marka63 · · Score: 1

    Then you should complain to the router vendor. Dynamic UPDATE and TSIG were
    standardised over a decade ago to allow everyone to use the same protocol.
    You should just be able to type in the update server's name if it isn't one of
    the zone's nameservers. If it is then it shouldn't be needed.

    nsupdate
    server <servername>
    key keyname <secret>
    update delete hostname A
    update add hostname 300 A 1.2.3.4
    send

  37. Lost dyndns account - my solution. by VlartBlart · · Score: 1

    I host a personal website on my pi - after losing my free dyndns account I came up with this solution. It's ugly but it works for me...

    I have an account with Dreamhost for my other sites. On Dreamhost I created a subdomain pi.mydomainname.com. My pi checks it's external ip address every 10 minutes - if it changes - it ftp's its new address to pi.mydomainname.com. If you browse over to pi.mydomainname.com there is an index.php that does a redirect to whatever the latest pi ip address is.

    My address changed last weekend and the site is still up.

  38. Whatever, there are always others by neminem · · Score: 1

    I use no-ip. Actually, they were having a sale a few months ago, so I threw them some money for a year. I don't use any of the fancy features, though it is pretty nice not getting the monthly nag email. Still, their free offering is fine, you just get a monthly nag email (which I'm sure dyn.com gave you something similar too).

  39. Now they've taken to spamming... by psychonaut · · Score: 1

    As of today it looks like they've started implementing a new business strategy: sending spam e-mails to their former free account holders for webinars. I've closed my account and added dyn.com to my spam filter.