Slashdot Mirror


Goodbye, Ctrl-S

An anonymous reader writes "'Save your work!' — This was a rallying cry for an entire generation of workers and students. The frequency and unpredictability of software crashes, power outages, and hardware failures made it imperative to constantly hit that save button. But in 2014? Not so much. My documents are automatically saved (with versioning) every time I make a change. My IDE commits code changes automatically. Many webforms will save drafts of whatever data I'm entering. Heck, even the games I play have an autosave feature. It's an interesting change — the young generation will grow up with an implicit trust that whatever they type into a computer will stay there. Maybe this is my generation's version of: 'In my day, we had to get up and walk across the room to change the channel on the TV!' In any case, it has some subtle but interesting effects on how people write, play, and create. No longer do we have to have constant interruptions to worry about whether our changes are saved — but at the same time, we don't have that pause to take a moment and reflect on what we've written. I'm sure we've all had moments where our hands hover over a save/submit button before changing our minds and hammering the backspace key. Maybe now we'll have to think before we write."

521 comments

  1. Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

    1. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

      In 30 years you've never produced anything worth saving? That's quite a feat.

    2. Re:Never used this keystroke by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the challenge with Ctrl-S was that you often didn't know if it did anything, and you found yourself going to the File menu to see if the Save button was grey, or to click it more than a few times "just to be sure."

      Trusting that your Google Doc was saved without hitting a button, or that a draft of your email was auto-generated takes a bit of trust that takes a while to build.

      If you're not a heavy user, it'll take time to build that trust.

    3. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quite possibly, he's a Mac user, so it would be Command-S. That, or someone loves their mouse a little too much and never bothered to learn keyboard shortcuts.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:Never used this keystroke by Steve_Ussler · · Score: 0

      You dont get the then poweruser award!

    5. Re:Never used this keystroke by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      And does that make you feel special? Better than the rest of us? Or what?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Never used this keystroke by sirlark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      :wq ... nuff said!

    7. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a mac fan, but I have to say that apple screwed the pooch with mavericks on this one. for the stock apple programs they got rid of the save button entirely and now everything auto saves. This is ok, but the really bad part is they got rid of save as - you know, you make some changes but decide you want to keep the original so you make this file v2 or whatever? Even worse, bowing to pressure they added back in the save as, but accessible as a secondary choice with option-click.

      the whole thing is just weird and to tell you the truth it made me stop using the apple programs so I never got used to it or fully figured it out.

    8. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      related to this thought, I read an article that Microsoft got rid of the start->shutdown button to turn off your computer. This freaked people out, even though for 15 years you've been able to just hit the power button and it would turn off properly. Article supposed that people's behavior had been burned in during the win 3.1/win 95 "it's now safe to turn off your computer" era. Article further speculated that it's hopeless to change any of these behaviors that have been so ingrained.

    9. Re:Never used this keystroke by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Years of assembling my own computers and not trusting L2 or L3 sleep left me as one of those guys who just has his computer on 24/7. :/

      I'm sure my Media Center machine will wake up and record stuff in the middle of the night, but trust is hard to come by in my house...

    10. Re:Never used this keystroke by haaz · · Score: 1

      I'm a Mac user, you insensitive clod. And it's funny, but continual saving by a recently purchased Chromebook prevented me from losing anything when due to its hyper-frequent crashing. It's a defective unit, nothing to do with Chrome OS. Suffice to say that soured my slight migratory experiment; I'm typing this on my trusty MacBook Pro.

      --
      -- haaz.
    11. Re:Never used this keystroke by azav · · Score: 0

      Command S for you Mac users.

      Honestly, I like to make sure my data is not lost, but really, as a result of having to save, I use save as a moment to make sure "Yeah, I made some good material, I'll save it now."

      In a few cases, I shudder, because there are things I might type to vent that I explicitly DO NOT WANT to be saved, ever, at all.

      Now, if I only had a toilet to wipe my ass for me, but only when I want it to.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    12. Re:Never used this keystroke by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      ALT-F S for me.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    13. Re:Never used this keystroke by azav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to be a Mac fan.

      That's sad. Because now I'm not. Apple seems to only care about new gizmos and animating everything, rather than sticking with creating useful and predictable interfaces.

      Ive is the worst thing for the UI that I've ever seen. It's soul deadening.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    14. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only Apple program I use is TextEdit, and that only for a scratch pad, so I'm more or less unaffected by that. That said, I can certainly see why it would be annoying... essentially, if you decide you want to save your changes in a new file, they want you to copy the most recent version (in Finder), then roll the original back the a previous version. The option-click "workaround" was added because people couldn't figure that out; not that they should have to, as "Save As..." should never have gone away in the first place. But, with autosave, it's somewhat of a hack, anyway; what does the original file end up looking like? Do you revert the original to the state it was in when it was last opened? The last autosave? Normally, it would retain its last manually-saved state, but there isn't one...

      Replacing a 3-step process (Command-Shift-S; Type new filename, Hit Enter) with a 7-step process (Close file [to ensure your changes are saved, since you can no longer do this manually]; Copy file; Rename copy; Reopen the file; Click File -> Revert To -> Browse All Versions; Find the version you want to revert to; Click Restore).

      Alternately, you can restore the old revision as a new file (the opposite workflow) in 5-steps (Click File -> Revert To -> Browse All Versions; Find the version you want; Option-Click Restore a Copy; Enter new filename; Click Save).

      Of course, Apple's own documentation does imply that the "Save" option still exists. It is there in TextEdit, but I can't confirm this for any other Apple apps under Mavericks.

      Bravo, Apple... Bravo.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    15. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Late 2011 17" MBP here... Apple screwed the pooch removing the Save function from their apps; though their current online documentation implies that it's back (and, indeed, it is in TextEdit, the only Apple app I use).

      Another thing Apple screwed up was dropping the 17" MBP line. 17" Retina MBP? Yes, please. Even if it's the same resolution as the 15", making the pixels just a hair bigger won't hurt; I like a slightly larger machine that can fit comfortably on my lap, without requiring that I keep my legs smashed together lest it fall between them, and has ample component spacing to allow for decent cooling, thank you very much. I'd love an upgrade, but they don't offer anything I find compelling anymore.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:Never used this keystroke by praxis · · Score: 1

      So a user that uses :ws is not eligible for this hypothetical award? It might be that you sir are Windows-centric in your thinking.

    17. Re:Never used this keystroke by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just apple, Microsoft and everyone else is catering to the dumb.

      Remove features, hide "advanced" things. etc.. the MOST frustrating app in the world is MS word... i spend more time undoing what it is trying to help me with than anything else. why cant I have a single option, "Expert mode" that disabled ALL the freaking help shit and un-hides all functions?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Never used this keystroke by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the challenge with Ctrl-S was that you often didn't know if it did anything,

      Or you use Kmail on KDE where ctrl-s saves AND closes the message! You have to look for it and reopen it if you want to continue editing it.

      The developers keep claiming the bug is fixed:
      https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug....
      https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug....

      But I just checked kmail 4.11.2 and it's not fixed! 12 years!

      I don't really care that much anymore since I've long stopped using KDE as a serious desktop environment due to this and many other bugs/annoyances. I've reported a number of them but you can see for yourself how they treat bug reports.

      Windows 7 has its annoyances (in aero mode the task button for the foreground/active window is not very distinct from the other task buttons, file search is broken). But for my purposes it isn't as bad as the popular Desktop Linux options (gnome, kde, unity).

      Windows 8 on the other hand is an abomination from a Desktop UI perspective.

      --
    19. Re: Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Novel concept. Not. VALDOSTA had this on a Z80-based Epson Q10 with floppies.

    20. Re:Never used this keystroke by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      Why would you do an Alt-F + S when you could do a Ctrl-S?

      Do not even get me started on how stupid it is to stop typing to use the mouse to navigate a menu to save a file.

      If you are new to computing then ok. After 30 years of using a computer though that would be the true idiot.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    21. Re:Never used this keystroke by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      I've mostly always used ZZ as I learned it before :wq. Save a keystroke that way too :P

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    22. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Your post displayed such a lack of insight (e.g. GP was making a joke) that I automatically assumed you used "your" in place of "you're". I had to read it twice before I realized you didn't fuck that up.

    23. Re:Never used this keystroke by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

      Me neither, but I also don't use Ctrl+X and Ctrl-V for Cut and Paste either, though that's what most people know them as.

      I learned Alt+F S for save, and Shift+Delete for Cut and Shift+Insert for paste many years ago and that has continued to work in almost any program.

      The exception tends to be Unix text editors. Naturally in vi there's a different command set, as well as nano. Using nano for a while right before browsing the web can be particularly problematic, since the Ctrl+W used for find in nano happens to close the current tab in Chrome and Firefox.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    24. Re:Never used this keystroke by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Informative

      :x for me.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    25. Re: Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VALDOCS. Damn auto correct. Another wonderful "feature"

    26. Re:Never used this keystroke by immaterial · · Score: 5, Informative

      I want Save As back as a first-class citizen as much as anyone, but the entirety of your rant there is simply flat-out wrong. You say there's no save option, but (as you half-acknowledge after complaining it doesn't exist) there is - and yes, it shows up in every document-based app. You say you have to go to Finder to duplicate a file, but the whole complaint here is that Save As has been replaced by Duplicate in the menu. The actual, still 3-step process is: Choose "Duplicate" (no need to save beforehand as it is the current state that is duplicated), type new file name, and (either the first time you do an explicit save or when you close the new document) deal with the Save dialog. The only way that is more difficult than Save As is that it disconnects renaming the new file from the save dialog. And if you prefer documents revert to the last manual-save state on close, simply check that box in the system preferences.

    27. Re: Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 17" is too big for a portable. What they really need is an External Retina Display.

    28. Re:Never used this keystroke by danlip · · Score: 2

      I like my 17 inch MPBs, but they could never get the hinges right, and I think that is why they stopped making them. Both of mine (the first being a G4, the second an Intel from around 2010) eventually had the screen bevel crack near the hinges. Even before that it was impossible to use either of them in a reclining position, i.e. on your back with the laptop up on your knees and the screen pointed somewhat downwards, because the hinges didn't have enough internal friction to hold up the weight of the screen. I've never seen either of these problems on a 15 in MBP.

    29. Re:Never used this keystroke by The123king · · Score: 1

      Install a non-ribbony version of MS Word

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    30. Re:Never used this keystroke by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      even though for 15 years you've been able to just hit the power button and it would turn off properly.

      Very large [citation needed]. I'll believe that when I see it. Maybe Windows 8 defaults to shut down (or Pseudo-Sort-of-Shut-Down-but-Really-Hibernate, more likely), but that's a configurable option and there is no way in hell I would just pound the power button before making damn sure what it was set to do.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    31. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I more than "half-acknowledge" how incorrect that rant is, I flat-out admit, in the first sentence, that the only Apple app I use is TextEdit, and that I use it in a minimalist capacity and, thus, have never encountered an issue with this. I then link to Apple's own documentation, which states that the options are, in fact, there, and verify that they exist in the app I use.

      As for *why* I would knowingly go off on such a blatantly incorrectly-based rant? I was speaking hypothetically, in terms of the complaints I keep hearing, rather than in terms of the reality of the situation; I wasn't complaining, myself, but rather I was putting myself (and the reader) in the shoes of one of the complainers, looking at this from their, potentially ignorant, perspective, and feeling the same angst and frustration they display. The fact remains, since these complaints keep coming up, Apple did fuck up by changing what their users are familiar with.

      Seriously, someone who's computer illiterate, but has learned what the Save and Save As functions do would feel like those functions were removed, even if just one of them was renamed. If you don't believe me, well, that's just fine; come up with a better explanation for why people are complaining that they're gone, then.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    32. Re:Never used this keystroke by immaterial · · Score: 2

      Edit (wish I could!): I forgot about closing the original document, which does add a step 4. Silly thing to forget, since that's the main reason I use Save As instead of Duplicate. I can only imagine some UI engineer thought this extra step would help dumb people realize they're making a second copy of their document (as opposed to renaming/moving it).

    33. Re:Never used this keystroke by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      why cant I have a single option, "Expert mode" that disabled ALL the freaking help shit and un-hides all functions?

      That might be nice, but it's not hard to disable all of that stuff from the options. I use Word all day, every single day, and I don't ever have to wrestle with it. It does auto-correct some of my typos, too, for which I'm thankful.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    34. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      My wife had the same issue with using this laptop in a reclining position (I inherited it when she inherited a 13" 2012 model from her father when he decided he'd rather have a 15"), but I haven't had the same experience. That might be because I realigned the hinges. They sometimes get installed at a slight angle (the screws to allow for some tiny misalignment), which causes them to bind at some angles and appear loose at others. If you feel them binding as the lid is almost closed, you have this issue. Rather than straighten them, I misaligned them in the other direction, so they bind when open; the laptop stays closed just fine, even during transport, because it has a magnetic closure. It's a simple procedure, though you to have to take the laptop apart a little farther than you may be comfortable with.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    35. Re:Never used this keystroke by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I read an article that Microsoft got rid of the start->shutdown button to turn off your computer. This freaked people out, even though for 15 years you've been able to just hit the power button and it would turn off properly.

      Yeah, but isn't it idiotic that to stop everything and shut down your computer, you clicked on "Start"?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    36. Re:Never used this keystroke by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Except on my laptop the power button sometimes means sleep. or hibernate. or deep-sleep. Sometimes it shuts down, depending on what Windows thinks it will do that day.. And, yes, this is on Win 8.1...

    37. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alt-F S for me, when I'm using Microsoft crap.

    38. Re:Never used this keystroke by Megane · · Score: 1

      since the Ctrl+W used for find in nano happens to close the current tab in Chrome and Firefox.

      Ctrl-W / Command-W has always pissed me off, because W is right next to Q, and that causes me to exit from stuff when I'm just trying to close a window or tab.

      As far as I know, that key mapping first appeared in Microsoft Word 1.0 for Macintosh. Back in those days, I would go into ResEdit and add a Command-K to File->Close in whatever programs I was using. It needed a key assigned, but I never thought W was a good choice.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    39. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use Textwrangler for coding as it is superior to Textedit. We are a Mac shop, and also are experiencing untypical bugs or differences with Mavericks.

    40. Re:Never used this keystroke by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to work out whether mice have been around that long. Bear with me a minute. Thinking back to college, *cough* 1980s. Windows one-point-fuck.

      Shiiiit, they have. Just.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:Never used this keystroke by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      :x for me.

      [John]

      From an early 90's email signature:

      :q![return]
      $ emacs[return]
      All the vi you'll ever need to know.

      [ctrl]-x[ctrl]-s then [ctrl]-x[ctrl]-w newfilename

      Go ahead and flame me, you vi folks. I don't mind.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    42. Re:Never used this keystroke by mcnuggets · · Score: 1

      File > Duplicate. Rename as you do it. No need to restore nor copy in the Finder nor any of the other acrobatics you describe. :)

    43. Re:Never used this keystroke by mcnuggets · · Score: 0

      I love TextWrangler, but it handles file operations and even some windowing operations differently than the norm of OS X and with no reason I can see. It is annoying and I hope the developers fix it!

    44. Re:Never used this keystroke by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Any halfway-decent program will put an asterisk, brackets or some other character(s) in the window's title to let you distinguish between a file that is identical to the copy saved on disk and a file that has been modified since last saving. If your program doesn't even append something as simple as "(modified)" to the title of the window containing your file, then your program sucks and it'd probably be a good idea to switch to something that at least supports such a basic feature.

    45. Re:Never used this keystroke by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

      Indeed. I've typed :w several times today.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    46. Re:Never used this keystroke by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      This is ok, but the really bad part is they got rid of save as - you know, you make some changes but decide you want to keep the original so you make this file v2 or whatever?

      I agree. I am a long Mac user too, but that was by no means the smartest thing Apple has ever done. It changes the whole workflow.

      Many applications, for a long time, have divided this into "save" for saving and "export" for saving a new file in a different format. But Apple left out the export capability, which is a HUGE omission.

      One workaround is to create a new file, copy and paste the contents of the old file into it, then pick a different format when you save for the first time. But it's a major PITA to do that.

    47. Re:Never used this keystroke by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      IIRC the way you were supposed to do it was by clicking "Duplicate", which opened a duplicate, untitled copy of what you were working on. I actually like this functionality, as Save As can sometimes make it confusing as to which version of a document you're working on. I've seen "Save As" create a new copy of the file but leave the old one open for editing, and I've seen it create a new file and make that one the one you're editing. It's easy to look at the title bar and check, but it's also easy to forget. Apple's way involves an extra button click, but it's unambiguous.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    48. Re:Never used this keystroke by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why should he (or anyone else) bother with keyboard shortcuts when the guys at bell labs proved that mouse beats keyboard by a pretty large margin?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    49. Re:Never used this keystroke by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Install a non-ribbony version of MS Word

      Precisely the reason I still use Office2003.. I DETEST that flippin' ribbon, and flat will NOT use anything that has it.. Of course, since I spend most of
      my time on Debian, I don't have this problem over there, what with LibreOffice... Don't care if Office 2003 is 11 years old, it still works and when I need
      *real* MS Office, its the one...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    50. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Mouse beats keyboard until you have to switch between the two or you find your mouse cursor on the opposite end of three 4k displays from the thing you want to click. Also, it seems their argument for the mouse being faster centers around positioning the text-entry cursor within a body of text; nobody is going to argue with you on that point, yes, it's faster to click 20 rows and lower and 80 columns to the right than it is to make 100 keystrokes. It is certainly faster to press Ctrl-S (or Command-S) than to move off of the keyboard, over to the mouse, move over to the menu, click, move to "Save", and click again. There is a balance, and for some things, yes, a keyboard shortcut is faster (Bell even admits this in their findings). They're also only comparing the Plan 9 text editor, Acme, to emacs; a fair comparison would be keyboard shortcuts vs menus within the same application on the same platform. For anything more than 1 level deep, a keyboard shortcut is, in fact, faster; and the keyboard is definitely faster if you happen to lose track of your mouse cursor, which is pretty easy to do on a modern "hide the cursor when I start typing" platform, like Windows, OSX, and quite a number of X environments, especially if you have multiple displays. I can't count the number of times I thought I left my cursor on the primary display, then spent 30+sec scanning all 3 of my displays trying to find it; it doesn't help that both Windows and OSX seem to have a habit of "losing" the cursor, themselves... completely hiding it when it enters the currently-focused window, and refusing to show its location until that window has lost focus (it's a rare occurence and certainly a bug in both platforms, but it does happen)!

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    51. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [esc]:q![return]

      Escape this colon thing, quit and never return.

    52. Re:Never used this keystroke by sexconker · · Score: 1

      even though for 15 years you've been able to just hit the power button and it would turn off properly.

      Very large [citation needed]. I'll believe that when I see it. Maybe Windows 8 defaults to shut down (or Pseudo-Sort-of-Shut-Down-but-Really-Hibernate, more likely), but that's a configurable option and there is no way in hell I would just pound the power button before making damn sure what it was set to do.

      The default in every version of Windows since at least 98 has been for the power button to safely shutdown the OS and switch the system off.
      The last time I ever saw the "It is now safe to shut down your computer" prompt was back in Windows 95. Windows 95 and 98 were the first versions of Windows to divorce themselves from DOS, though you could still drop to / boot to (true) DOS and run "win" to start Windows.
      It's shitty OEMs who change the default from shut down to hibernate / sleep.

    53. Re:Never used this keystroke by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Roughly since 1963, actually. Described in a paper from 1962.

    54. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, you're just now realising this? I figured that out back in the 80s when companies were trying to slap these hideous and slow graphical environments in to operating systems. My friends and I always looked down our nose at GUI users, both Mac and Windows.

    55. Re:Never used this keystroke by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Well it doesn't really matter to the end user who set the setting, Microsoft or the OEM.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    56. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom? remember, when reading tutorials online, Ctrl-S is the Command-S for Windows people, so you have to translate for your Mac.

    57. Re: Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opt in by default is frustrating when the default is 'take a shit and smear it in your face.'. Yes, the second time you can opt out of the face shit experience... But you still have shit on your face.

    58. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      you got some heat for your comments, but you're spot on. Apple's method breaks when a user edits a file and decides he wants to save the new version as a new file leave the original file unchanged. It would seem that it's impossible to just open a file without it being updated as well. It's like some weird Heisenberg steve jobs uncertainty principle. That being said, now that you explained it clearly, I understand the issue better and also what my hang ups were.

    59. Re:Never used this keystroke by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      I read an article that Microsoft got rid of the start->shutdown button to turn off your computer. This freaked people out, even though for 15 years you've been able to just hit the power button and it would turn off properly.

      Yeah, but isn't it idiotic that to stop everything and shut down your computer, you clicked on "Start"?

      Yep. In fact almost to decades ago when the start menu arrived (with Win 95 I think) that was major complaint - "how do I shut down, start ?, but that's the last place you'd look to shut down". Personally, from a Unix background, I thought it was perfectly reasonable to "start" a "shutdown", but hey - the majority seemed to think that the file menu of program manager was the logical place...

      Now everyone's complaining that they took it away from "start" and put it under "power" on the settings menu.

      Some things don't change - "people don't like change" is one.

    60. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the problem is if you attempt this work flow: you open up a file, make some edits, and decide you want to save the edited version as a new file and leave the original file unchanged. Before Mavericks, this was no problem because this was exactly what the Save As button was for. In Mavericks you need to jump through all the hoops that GP describes.

    61. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I expected that heat, it's actually one of the things that keeps me coming back here. More than a handful of times I've been shown that my viewpoint or understanding of a topic is actually wrong and have emerged a better person for it.

      But yes, given that "Save As" and "Duplicate" essentially do the same thing and that, by the time the action of either option has been completed, both copies of the file will be identical, it really and truly is impossible to save your new changes as a new file, leaving the original untouched; you *must* roll back the changes in one file or the other, which is an added step that clearly, based on some of the replies I've received, some people are perfectly willing to accept.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    62. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the point is, on all computers from DOS to win 3.1 to win 95 the power button was a dumb switch, like throwing a circuit breaker. if the OS was in the middle of writing to your autoexec.bat? too bad, you're effed, who knows what will happen when you turn it on. The only safe way was to do a software power down from the start menu, then turn your computer off. Only in the late 90s did the power buttons connect with the OS, so pressing the power button activated the OS shutdown process, and the OS could turn off the computer. Maybe the software functionality was introduced in Win 95, but it took time for the hardware features to arrive because I didn't see it for a long time.

    63. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the point is, in Win 3.1 and win 95 the power button was like a circuit breaker. it just turned all the power off. there would be no safe shutdown, whether to sleep, or hibernate, or deep sleep, or power off, or whatever.

    64. Re:Never used this keystroke by klui · · Score: 1

      If you've been using computers for 30 years, you should have used it but not in this article's context. My first thought was XON/XOFF was being deprecated, as in ^S/^Q in a TTY.

    65. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :wq

      Enough said

    66. Re:Never used this keystroke by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Same here, I still use the old MS "standard". IIRC MS added CtrlC, CtrlV, etc, because they were trying to "embrace and extend" WordStar.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    67. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! Each time I press Ctrl + S, this article stops scrolling.

    68. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That's wonderful until you make changes, THEN decide you want to save the new version as a different document. Then, you have to duplicate, then roll back one of the copies to the previous state. Hopefully it didn't autosave more than a handful of times since you started editing, or you'll have a tough time finding the version you wanted to keep!

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    69. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the "all functions" part of your comment but what help shit can't you disable in the AutoCorrect options? Besides a quick ctrl+z usually will undo any auto action done by MS Word.

    70. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want Save As back as a first-class citizen as much as anyone, but the entirety of your rant there is simply flat-out wrong. You say there's no save option, but (as you half-acknowledge after complaining it doesn't exist) there is - and yes, it shows up in every document-based app. You say you have to go to Finder to duplicate a file, but the whole complaint here is that Save As has been replaced by Duplicate in the menu. The actual, still 3-step process is: Choose "Duplicate" (no need to save beforehand as it is the current state that is duplicated), type new file name, and (either the first time you do an explicit save or when you close the new document) deal with the Save dialog. The only way that is more difficult than Save As is that it disconnects renaming the new file from the save dialog. And if you prefer documents revert to the last manual-save state on close, simply check that box in the system preferences.

      Yes it's somewhat back in Maverick with Duplicate but it feels like a Windows solution. it's a half ass attempt to NOT fix a users complaint. To tell you the truth I was avoiding all programs that autosave due to this feature so I was not even aware that they added the duplicate option. But it still feels wrong. Command shift S? to duplicate? then you have to save to place it where you want. If you keep all your documents in one folder this might work for you but if you manage your documents and have a different filing system (or any system) then the save/duplicate dialogue should also have as it was the option to save it in a different location. /rant

    71. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

      In 30 years you've never produced anything worth saving? That's quite a feat.

      BURNNNNNNNN

    72. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are bad and you should feel bad.

    73. Re:Never used this keystroke by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      What? No. Mouse vs. Keyboard shows that the mouse is better for moving around, compared to one of the UNIX-style editors where moving the cursor takes many keys. That's it. If you are doing a job other than moving the cursor and/or text around, keyboard beats mouse. Navigation is the thing the mouse is good at.

      The context for TFA is writing new content, and there a save keyboard shortcut is far more efficient than anything else. It's only when you change your focus from there to editing that the mouse becomes a viable alternate navigation method.

    74. Re:Never used this keystroke by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What is in the original file after you use the Duplicate menu? The last auto-save or the original contents of the file when you opened it? Often I open something, make some changes and then decide I want to save it as a new file and keep the original. Seems like with duplicate you have to make that decision before you start editing to avoid auto-saving over the old one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    75. Re:Never used this keystroke by sillybilly · · Score: 2

      The idea is that you're not supposed to save anything on local disk, everything should be on the cloud, and you get to get blackmailed for access to it. Or at least intellectual property is fully contained, as there is a single copy of it anywhere on the web, and no 500 million copies on everybody's local harddrives. Then you pay for access, pay per view, and copyright fair use issues are simpler. Which is why I seriously started investing in oldschool tech, including old software, old computers, or old tv's, that can record and playback without asking for permission each time from authorities, authorities that may not be there after a government financial collapse and apocalypse ensuing after it. Have you checked the national debt lately? In how many years are we predicted to pay it off? 50? More? Even if it's more, that means a gradual decrease of the debt, and instead all I hear is disagreements about raising the debt ceiling even further. If they tell me inflation is outpacing the rate of indebtedness of the government, so that the whole debt will be minuscule once minimum wage rises to 10 trillion dollars per hr, then I'll say, aha, they've got a plan. But I had to see everybody's money savings go to waste, and a destabilized currency makes life hell. Something eventually gotta give, and I'd pick an inflation out of control but the gov't maintaining control of the situation and still feeding everybody vs. an apocalypse and anarchy where people start eating each other. Without a guarantee of the internet available 20 or 50 years from now, and webpages doing the authentication and approval of what I'm buying today still up and in business 50 years from now, I'm keepin my save button, and prefer nonauthenticated, non"activated" software and files.

    76. Re:Never used this keystroke by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Correction (above): I had to see = I hate to see (everybody's saved money going to waste.)

    77. Re:Never used this keystroke by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the big deal about the ribbon. I'm an "advanced" MS Office user (the term itself is somewhat of an oxymoron) and I can find all the functionality I need on the ribbon. And Office 2007+ has many many advantages over Office 2003.

    78. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhmmm.. you can turn that off.

    79. Re:Never used this keystroke by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Save As is now 'Duplicate' and then you rename it, not aware of any apps that removed Save As that didn't add Duplicate

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    80. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LibreOffice? Openoffice?

    81. Re:Never used this keystroke by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The fact remains, since these complaints keep coming up, Apple did fuck up by changing what their users are familiar with.

      That's not a fact, that's your opinion.

      The fact is that Apple brought in a new feature of auto save, with multiple versions available to go back to. In that way of working, "Save As" to create a variation of a file is poorly defined. What does the original file contain, and what does the new file contain? In the days before autosave, the original file would be the same state it was the last time you manually loaded it or saved it. Now, with autosave, at the point of doing save as, both files would be identical. Changing the word to "Duplicate" represents more clearly what the actual action is. As the point you do it, you get two files that are exactly the same. The old "Save as..." has no such logical model.

      The other 2 reasons people used "Save as..." was to simply change the name of the file or to move it somewhere else. With the unfortunate side effect of also leaving a zombie copy of the file under the old name/location. Again, better to remove the ill-named "Save as..." and have the words that represents the actual intentions. "Rename..." and "Move to...".

      Apple did what they always did. They made improvements, and in doing so didn't worry too much about sticking with the old way of doing things simply because it was always that way.

      Seriously, someone who's computer illiterate, but has learned what the Save and Save As functions do would feel like those functions were removed, even if just one of them was renamed. If you don't believe me, well, that's just fine; come up with a better explanation for why people are complaining that they're gone, then.

      The way our computers work shouldn't be defined by what the computer illiterate are used to. If new technology makes the old way obsolete, so be it.

    82. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No, but close. If you've already made your edits, "Save As" is now "Duplicate, then roll back to the version you started with"; if you know in advance that you're going to want to keep the original version, then yes, "Duplicate" (or simply making a copy) is identical to "Save As"; however, that's not how "Save As" is typically used.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    83. Re:Never used this keystroke by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Since manual saving is still an option, "Save As" would maintain the same behavior it's always had; save my new changes as a new file and leave the original in the state it was in when I last opened or manually saved it. That's what "Save As" does on systems that don't autosave (hell, that's what it does in MS Office apps that DO autosave), so why can't Apple implement that?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    84. Re: Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people really just want a desktop that they can sometimes lug around when they need to. Luckily they can still get that with a PC.

    85. Re:Never used this keystroke by doccus · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. some programs still use "save as" some use "duplicate" some have an integreated toolbar and some use the Apple one .. hell it's sounding a lot more like linux. The Apple human interface guidelines rulebook has truly been burned to shreds by 2014..

    86. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I"ve been using computers for over 30 years also, and still always doing a ctrl-s about each minute !

    87. Re:Never used this keystroke by tjb6 · · Score: 1

      For me, Ctrl-S always meant Xon - pause the scrolling output so you can read it.

      Still works on most systems (at least most systems worth using!)

      Otherwise, it's Ctrl-X Ctrl-S to save, none of those namby pamby single key strokes.

    88. Re:Never used this keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There IS an expert mode. I use it all the time.. If you don't know how to turn it on, you are obviously not an expert.

    89. Re:Never used this keystroke by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      By the way Zimbabwe had a currency between 1980 and 2009, called the Zimbabwean dollar, Z$, that hyperinflated through the roof by not having a sound monetary policy - the president of dictator or whatever you wanna call him, instead of collecting taxes and staying within the limits of available funds collected, he simply didn't collect taxes and started up the printing machines when it came time to pay any government dues, such as employee salaries, or weapons for his military people. You can see pictures of Z$500 and later Z$100,000,000,000,000 (100 trillion Z$ banknotes) at the wikipedia article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z... and you can buy one of these notes on Ebay at http://www.ebay.com/itm/100-Tr... the bidding stands at US$5.50 with 3 days and 3 hrs left to bid, or $16.99 buy it now on other auctions. The Z$ went through three redenominations, dropping zeros at the end (ATM machines were started choking up and software had to be custom designed for Zimbabwe), According to the wikipedia article,

      The third redenomination produced the "fourth dollar" (ZWL), which was worth 1 trillion ZWR (third dollar), or 10^25 ZWD (first dollar). Despite attempts to control inflation by legislation, and three redenominations (in 2006, 2008 and 2009), use of the Zimbabwean dollar as an official currency was effectively abandoned on 12 April 2009 due to the skyrocketing inflation. According to some sources, a person would starve on just a billion Zimbabwe dollars.[3] This was a result of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe legalising use of foreign currencies for transactions in January 2009.[4]

      That's 10^25 first dollars, or 25 zeros, or 4thZ$1 = 1st Z$10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 revaluation for the 4th generation in 2009 compared to the 1980 dollars. The result was legalizing foreign currencies, such as the stable US$ that the whole world uses where there are currency control issues, including China themselves used to peg their currency against the US$ and underwrite it's value with a tremedous amount of sweat. But once you remove the Chinese underwriting support, sending the US$ into an inflation spiral becomes easy, and inflating the heck out of our currency would be a great way to get rid of national debt, and create havoc in the whole world's economy. In theory holders of debt notes get paid an interest rate for the risk of inflation and other risks they assume in lending that money, but if inflation gets out of control, the winners are not the interest collectors but the debtors, because they have to pay back almost nothing, comparatively speaking.

    90. Re:Never used this keystroke by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      They CAN implement anything. But what you suggest is not clear. Because of autosave, that would actually be unwinding the currently saved version of the file to some earlier version. Which again is not part of the phrase "Save as...".

      Now, as someone said, apparently Apple HAVE implemented something called Save as... under a modifier keypress. But I'm not clear what it would do. And that lack of clarity was the exact reason it was changed in favour of menu items that are clear about what they do.

    91. Re:Never used this keystroke by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What about 'Alt' then 'F', then 'S'?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    92. Re:Never used this keystroke by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      The change to Save-as had the unfortunate effect of lost functionality. If you do not see this, then you are a part of the developer's problem.
      The users want to save the current state without saving over the previous state. The "upgrade" is destroying the previous state. The new version looses functionality.
      If the developers do not think that is important, and the users do, then the developers are automatically wrong...

    93. Re:Never used this keystroke by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The change to Save-as had the unfortunate effect of lost functionality. If you do not see this, then you are a part of the developer's problem.
      The users want to save the current state without saving over the previous state. The "upgrade" is destroying the previous state.

      You're wrong in thinking this change is because of Save As. It's because of autosave. The lost of Save As as a primary function is another symptom, not the cause.

      And autosave represents a vast improvement in functionality and safety, not a loss.

      If you do not see this, then you are a part of the developer's problem.

      I see it for exactly what it is. Users being used to what always was a bad and unsafe practice. The new functionality is better in every way. It's just not familiar. Why subject future generations to a lesser UI simply because some people don't want to change.

    94. Re:Never used this keystroke by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      There can be more than one way to do things. If the user does something expecting a result, then if possible that result should occur.
      Some things are mutually exclusive, but the idea that there is only one way to do it shows a lack of imagination. And maybe some hubris.

      By the way, I have a programmer's text editor that has the autosave configurable. And also has a save-as. I find that they work well together if the autosave is not set too short.

    95. Re:Never used this keystroke by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Well, emacs isn't installed on systems by default and since I administer unix servers, knowing vi is much more valuable than knowing emacs.

      And no need to flame. Use whatever works best for you. I use vi because it's on all the systems I manage, from Tru64 on Alphas to Solaris to HP-UX and yes to Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Slackware.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    96. Re:Never used this keystroke by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Well, emacs isn't installed on systems by default and since I administer unix servers, knowing vi is much more valuable than knowing emacs.

      And no need to flame. Use whatever works best for you. I use vi because it's on all the systems I manage, from Tru64 on Alphas to Solaris to HP-UX and yes to Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Slackware.

      [John]

      Hey. It's all in fun, John. And you'll get no argument from me. I do and have managed Unix (not just Linux, either -- Oh, for those SunOS 4.1 days...not!) systems of various flavors, and I can use vi (or ed, [shudder]) if I need to do so. However, emacs is what I cut my teeth on (it kicked ass over ED/EDT!) and I enormously prefer it to vi. All the same, I can't always install my editor of choice (my personal preferences don't always matter on production systems) and will use what's available.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  2. CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus saves!

    1. Re:CTRL+S by mmell · · Score: 2

      Jesus saves!

      At First National Bank and Trust.

    2. Re:CTRL+S by captjc · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...passes to Moses...SCORE!

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    3. Re:CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jesus and Satan were constantly bickering over who could use the computer better. Finally, Saint Peter got tired of it and challenged them to have a day long compute-off to settle once and for all who could use the computer better.

      The day of the contest came. Both Jesus and Satan spent all day writing documents and creating spreadsheets. Many words were processed, and many numbers were crunched.

      Twenty three hours and fifty minutes into the competition, both computers crashed. Satan began cursing at all of the work that he lost, but Jesus just calmly restarted his computer. Jesus won the competition, because Jesus saves.

      Thanks!, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip the waitress.

    4. Re:CTRL+S by tombrand · · Score: 1

      By shopping wisely and using coupons!

    5. Re:CTRL+S by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jesus saves!

      And takes half damage from the fireball.

    6. Re:CTRL+S by eastjesus · · Score: 1

      Jesus saves, Moses invests, Budha lives on the interest. - the rest of the story.

    7. Re:CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that was a long way to go for a corny punchline.

    8. Re:CTRL+S by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're getting called out pretty hard by APK.

    9. Re:CTRL+S by mmell · · Score: 1

      Yeah - he's the gift that keeps on giving - sorta like gonorrhea. Hilarious, isn't he?

    10. Re:CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmell you gave yourself that gift by libeling apk bringing it on yourself.

    11. Re:CTRL+S by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Jesus saves!

      Vishnu scores from the rebound!

      No wait, it's disallowed. The ref is signalling handhandhandhandball.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you'll disappear for 12 days for modpoints like you did last time you did this troll http://slashdot.org/comments.p... but don't worry: I'll be here to ask you how "eating your words" tasted again too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... considering you rammed them down your throat since your foot was in your mouth washing it all down with the bitter taste of SELF defeat on your part you libeling little loser.

    13. Re:CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus saves!

      And takes half damage from the fireball.

      Half damage? He's the son of God... he's going to have Evasion.

  3. Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ago.. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 5, Funny

    When it stopped meaning "Suspend output to terminal" along with it's partner CTRL-Q.

    In-Band serial flow control ftw!

    G.

  4. I'd rather not use by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    a text editor that is so error prone that *needs* to autosave constantly("continuously"). Or software in general, for that matter.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:I'd rather not use by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1

      a text editor that is so error prone that *needs* to autosave constantly("continuously"). Or software in general, for that matter.

      You've got it backwards--it ain't an error-prone text editor, it's an error-prone human. Even conscientious, process-driven users make stupid mistakes and forget to save their work (especially when they're on a roll.) This protects us from ourselves, not the machines we're working on.

      Now, you may be among that handful of people who never forgets to save--in which case, I congratulate you on being in one of the outlier cohorts that software engineers really shouldn't ever spend their time worrying about. :D

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    2. Re:I'd rather not use by ildon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage. I just had one last night. Or maybe you've had a cat step on your keyboard and somehow manage to close the window you were working in. There are enough acts of god and human error that still exist regardless of how flawless the program you're working in is to make autosave highly valuable. The 1000 times you don't need autosave are not nearly as critical as the 1 time you do.

    3. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even have any software that does this. I remember when some DOS word processors added the option circa 1986, but I've never enabled it.

    4. Re:I'd rather not use by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, computers would fail for no explicable reason.

      Or, more likely, your hand would brush against the RESET key that was prominently featured on the keyboard right below RETURN.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    5. Re:I'd rather not use by mmell · · Score: 1
      You forgot the error-prone OS. QEdit never took a dump on me, but MS-DOS 2.x was known to crap out, especially once I started running TSR programs (carousel.exe and printman.exe come screaming to mind) - but I suppose that's what I get for trying to force MS-DOS to multitask.

      Old habits die hard - I still find myself repeating the mantra "save early, save often".

    6. Re:I'd rather not use by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage.

      That's where you reboot and the file is full of garbage because it crashed half-way through writing the new file to disk and the metadata was updated but not the contents, right?

    7. Re:I'd rather not use by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, computers would fail for no explicable reason.

      My favorite unexplained error message from back in the mid 1980s was from tcsh, "Assertion botch: This can't happen!"

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    8. Re:I'd rather not use by gigne · · Score: 1

      I used to be in the group of people that didn't save often.... at least until I owned a box that would bluescreen randomly.... and frequently. Amazing how that has changed my habits forever.

      Now I have the problem of auto-saving breaking my shit.

      If I open a doc and start changing it, I may want to save it as a different file completely. Problem is, autosave has overwritten theoriginal file. (admittedly this has only happened once, and it was a not so great application).

      Now if I am changing a doc, the first thing I do is save-as.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    9. Re:I'd rather not use by lgw · · Score: 2

      This is a solved problem: Office e.g. does a merry dance when saving files (save, then rename) to avoid exactly this problem, since it used to be such a big issue around 2000.

      You can protect against user error; you can protect against Acts of God; but I remain unconvinced you can protect against Acts of Cat.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:I'd rather not use by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Heh! On one of my first projects, I was coding for hours without hitting "save". I think half the country heard my yell when the system went down. I've been paranoid about saving ever since.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:I'd rather not use by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      It's not the text editor (vi), it's not the OS (Emacs). If my computer ran on smugness and body odor, everything would be fine, but no it runs on electricity. Fucking municipal electrity controlled by do-goody-good liberals that think brown outs and power outages are a good thing because electricity is evil, especially when it's affordable. (And yes, I have a UPS. It doesn't help when the shit hits the fan while I'm stocking up on cheetos or at the hospital for another heart attack).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of a save as a DB transaction. Now, look up ways to make sure transactions commit cleanly.

    13. Re:I'd rather not use by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage. I just had one last night.

      Perhpas you have heard of a thing called a UPS, or, perhaps, a battery, which most laptops seem to contain these days.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:I'd rather not use by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I remember turning my head when a small dog wandered by, rotating my chair slowly. As the dog sat to look at me, I bumped my toe into the reset button.

    15. Re:I'd rather not use by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      These are somewhat rare, and how long do you actually go between manually saving that it would be a major disaster if the computer crashed w/o auto-saving? And besides, if the computer did crash soon after saving your file then there's a high probability that your file ends up corrupted because it hasn't been flushed.

    16. Re:I'd rather not use by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      By "back in my day" I think you mean "today".

    17. Re:I'd rather not use by danlip · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage.

      Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a UPS?

    18. Re:I'd rather not use by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      a text editor that is so error prone that *needs* to autosave constantly("continuously"). Or software in general, for that matter.

      You've got it backwards--it ain't an error-prone text editor, it's an error-prone human. Even conscientious, process-driven users make stupid mistakes and forget to save their work (especially when they're on a roll.) This protects us from ourselves, not the machines we're working on.

      Now, you may be among that handful of people who never forgets to save--in which case, I congratulate you on being in one of the outlier cohorts that software engineers really shouldn't ever spend their time worrying about. :D

      What programs are you using that doesn't intercept that quit where you have unsaved work and prompt you to save or acknowledge that you'll lose work? Other than my browser where I'm filling in a form, I can't think of anything that allows you easily lose your work ... power outages ignored for this as they're realtively rare and a UPS handily gives you time to save before the machine goes down.

      Generally speaking, I don't like auto-save because there are many times where I work for a bit to try to figure something out and when that idea doesn't work, reverting to where I started is easy, or if the idea worked out then I can save. With auto-save, that revert ability becomes a lot harder or else impossible if the undo buffer is not large enough. Now, if it wants to auto-save to a temp file to prevent lose of work and make recovery easy if the something bad happens (like vim does) while the real file remains unaltered, that's great and something I'll welcome ... all other forms of auto-save need not apply. :)

    19. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which caused its own issue... the NTFS permission denying delete access now means that someone cannot save changes to a document as saving changes now requires...
      1. Save new copy of document to temporary file.
      2. Delete old copy of document.
      3. Rename temporary copy to permanent copy.

      By the time I had a client request that function (people can change documents but not delete), it was no longer a possibility.

    20. Re:I'd rather not use by lgw · · Score: 1

      It remains one of the stupidest ideas in computing history: making delete permission different from modify permission. It solves no problem, creates many problems, and PHBs think it's clever.

      Meanwhile, no one ever bothers to turn off "execute" permission by default in NTFS, despite it being such a good and common best practice in the Unix world.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:I'd rather not use by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      By the time I had a client request that function (people can change documents but not delete), it was no longer a possibility.

      It's a dumb idea in most cases, usually blanking out a file or replacing it's contents with random garbage is just as bad as deleting it. Maybe worse because it makes people think the file is still there until they look inside.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Error 0: No error.

    23. Re:I'd rather not use by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Older Word versions (Word 6, Word 2000) were error prone enough that the number of software crashes exceeded my number of stupid mistakes.

      Now Office 2010 has changed that for me, so *today* you are right (and Libre Office is also pretty stable). But historically, GP had good reasons for his attitude.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    24. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a solved problem: Office e.g. does a merry dance when saving files (save, then rename) to avoid exactly this problem, since it used to be such a big issue around 2000.

      In the modern era of journalled filesystem metadata but unjournalled file contents, this is not guaranteed to work.

    25. Re:I'd rather not use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite unexplained error message from back in the mid 1980s was from tcsh, "Assertion botch: This can't happen!"

      I first read this as "Assertion biotch", which was confusing since "biotch" wasn't a thing in the 80's.

  5. IDE autocommit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which one does that?

    1. Re:IDE autocommit? by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would anyone want to autocommit possibly broken code?

    2. Re:IDE autocommit? by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      I think there might be an Eclipse option. We had a new guy once who had some IDE auto-committing. He had a ridiculous number of completely uninformative commits early on. Very quickly the top item on his task list became "Figure out how to disable auto-commit"

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:IDE autocommit? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would anyone want to autocommit possibly broken code?

      Maybe they work for Adobe?

    4. Re:IDE autocommit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea thats gotta be one of the dumber things I've seen here today.

    5. Re:IDE autocommit? by lgw · · Score: 1

      When I started in the industry, I used an ancient mainframe code editor, and it "committed" after every line and it had no undo. Uphill through the snow, both ways, I tell ya! At least now as we come back around the wheel to auto-save, we have the chance to do it better.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:IDE autocommit? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      If using Git (or similar), perhaps the IDE can commit regularly, and afterwards the many commits can be turned into a single commit, with a commit message.

      (I don't know if this exists or not.)

    7. Re:IDE autocommit? by fightinfilipino · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to autocommit possibly broken code?

      the mere thought of it makes my Heart Bleed.

    8. Re:IDE autocommit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billable hours

    9. Re:IDE autocommit? by Alef · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as Git is concerned, that would be rather pointless, considering that committing in Git simply means copying an already saved file to a different directory locally. The only thing that protects you from is accidentally messing up the contents of the file and then saving it. And that is assuming that the IDE keeps the entire string of commits, instead of squashing them, creating an insanely bloated version history.

      Of course you could set it up to automatically push the commit to a remote repository as well, in order to lose a slightly smaller amount of work if the hard-drive fails. I would use RAID instead.

    10. Re:IDE autocommit? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Glad to see that somebody else had my same thought. The fuck? The whole point of committing is that you wait until you're fairly certain it works before you do it.

      *cue mob of angry pitchfork-wielding, git-battlescarred developers when your autocommitted nonfunctional code fucks over a merge*

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:IDE autocommit? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that source code control should be used as a backup system. However a lot of people do feel this way for some reason, misusing the tools.

    12. Re:IDE autocommit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm going to use this in my next performance review. Should help explain a lot of things about my code.

    13. Re:IDE autocommit? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      git checkout -b daily-grind
      Auto commit while I'm working on code. Time to commit to the public repo.
      git rebase
      Now I squash all those things I was doing into one commit.
      git checkout my-working-branch
      git merge daily-grind
      git push

      Now my working code has been pushed into a repository that's not got automated stuff, and from there I issue a pull request or perhaps push it over SSH to a more centralized server. I could do that from the automated repo, on bigger projects to avoid multiple copies, but on smaller repositories I like the extra layer of oops protection.

      You see, branches in Git are easy and cheap, they're not massive checkouts of a repository, they're just pointers to places in time referencing the common history. That means you can make lots of commits and actually USE your version control locally rather than be a slave to it -- Afraid to commit unless you're absolutely positive you're ready. So, I create multiple new branches all the time, every day even just to do some experimental thing I might not want to commit, if things don't work out I just drop that branch and carry on. Git is my auto-save, so that I have unlimited undo.

      Say you're working on a commit for hours or days and you haven't committed it yet because you're avoiding "thrashing the repository" by creating your own new branch. Hard drive fails. Now you've got to redo that work. Not me. I've got multiple drives for one, and for two a group staging server has a remote bacukp that's been pushed to every few minutes if there's been a change, so at most I've only lost a few minutes of work.

      Doing this on someone else's dime? Sure, who cares, you get paid by the hour. On my time? Nah, "lost data" isn't a situation that I have to risk so I don't.

    14. Re:IDE autocommit? by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 1

      Hm, auto-pushing to a private remote branch would actually be useful in case of a hard-drive fail. But to actually be useful I would also need to have a copy of my working directory.

      But then again, I rather risk losing 1~3 hours of work once in my life than setting up this kind of environment.

    15. Re:IDE autocommit? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Even you're not talking about auto-committing, though, which was the whole original point of this article. In this context auto-commits aren't going to help you any more than pounding Ctrl+S every once in awhile, since they reflect your thought processes not at all, either.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    16. Re:IDE autocommit? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you explicitly say auto-committing at the beginning but that sounds antithetical to "you can make lots of commits and actually USE your version control," which sounds like you're purposely choosing when to commit, not every X time period.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    17. Re:IDE autocommit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can recover and still undo after a power outage?

      You don't have to commit to a server. You could commit to a temporary branch and your "commit" option in the IDE becomes a merge back to the original work branch (Possibly only a commit of the full diff rather than a merge of the commit chain).

    18. Re:IDE autocommit? by Alef · · Score: 1

      Ah, you must be talking about real men. ;-)

    19. Re:IDE autocommit? by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't happen to be piping the output of cat to a file now, would it?

    20. Re:IDE autocommit? by lgw · · Score: 1

      No, it was a fully mature "line editor", designed to the constraints of punchcards, coupled to a DB of sorts that held all source files. There was no change tracking in the usual sense, but it would show who last changed each line, and preserve that meta-data across renames.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  6. Saved, with conditions . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your material will be saved to the cloud where the NSA computers can check it and make sure you're not doing anything illegal. But please just ignore the prying eyes, citizen, and get back to work for the Man. After all, he owns the NSA now.

  7. 6 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are no comments"

    Wtf Slashdot beta?

  8. Is this Article from 1993? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is Alt+F S!

  9. Good! by stewsters · · Score: 5, Funny

    Truly it is the year of the Linux Desktop. Long live :w

    1. Re:Good! by bchat · · Score: 0

      It certainly is for me. And I appreciate Microsoft for helping out by releasing Windose 8.x and Soreface.

  10. One problem with auto saving by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    is how do revert to older versions? I use a program that saves every change so while a crash would not result in lost work I can't revert to an earlier version unless I save a copy first before editing. Fortunately I use another program that saves a copy every time I use Carl-s so I can roll back from its copies.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:One problem with auto saving by MagicM · · Score: 2

      Carl-s

      It's only pronounced that way. When writing we still use "Ctrl".

    2. Re:One problem with auto saving by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Carl-s

      It's only pronounced that way. When writing we still use "Ctrl".

      Gotta luv speal cheakers...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:One problem with auto saving by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Carl-s

      It's only pronounced that way.

      It is? When did this start? "Control" is too difficult to say?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:One problem with auto saving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carl-s

      Anonymous Coward prefers to use 'troll-s.

    5. Re:One problem with auto saving by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's spelled correctly. You actually need a proof-reader not a spell checker.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  11. Dafuq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll keep my I-search, thank you very much.

  12. Commits code changes automatically by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My IDE commits code changes automatically

    TFA doesn't mention this and, if the summary writer meant "commit" as in version control commit, this would be a killer bug in the whole process.

    Version control is not meant to be used as a backup, every commit should be deliberate, reviewed and well explained in the comments. Vide the post mortem of the heartbleed bug (or many other similar ones).

    1. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IDEs such as Eclipse have a local revision history that's (hopefully) separate from your main source control system. Though I didn't think Eclipse auto-saves your work. In fact, I hate it when tools auto-save. I open a lot of files and mess with their contents without wanting to save them. For example, if I want to temporary adjust document borders so I can cram a long document onto less paper. I don't want those changes saved.

    2. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Shados · · Score: 2

      Auto-commit is probably overkill, but: distributed source control.

      I commit to my local branch at every semi-reasonable checkpoint, and yeah, after a while my commit messages look like those from that XKCD about git. Every so often I'll push to a private remote branch as a backup.

      Then when I squash my commits and push the atomic change to the main repo, yeah, that will be a deliberate, reviewed and well explained commit. But only then.

      We're not all on SVN and SourceSafe anymore!

    3. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, a workflow that actually does a commit would probably work great in git.

      - create topic branch
      - IDE commits periodically
      - when you're ready, squash everything into a single commit.

      If you think about it, it's not that different from the (or at least my) usual git workflow anyway.

    4. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Threni · · Score: 2

      I commit at the end of every session. Why not? What's the cost? I use Git. Should I be doing it some other way, or not using Git? Please explain?

      In computer science, these "you should do it this way" one size fits all edicts are usually sub-optimal.

    5. Re:Commits code changes automatically by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Version control is not meant to be used as a backup, every commit should be deliberate, reviewed and well explained in the comments. Vide the post mortem of the heartbleed bug (or many other similar ones).

      Only if you have the ancient, outdated, bad, deprecated, idiotic, CVS view of version control. To quote Linus "if you still use CVS, you're stupid, and probably ugly". Hopefully no one still does, but that "branching is expensive" mindset persists.

      A commit is precisely a backup, nothing more. A way to make you your work survive dropping your laptop. A merge back into a real branch should be the point of careful review.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes this true? Version control is not backup, but intermediate versions of the source are versions that can be in committed.
      Am I think only one that goes down wrong paths for a little while and will revert to a previous unfinished version with these intermediate commits?
      Svn keeps the commits on branches so they don't get in the way of understanding the flow of trunk, and git allows you to squash them together later.

    7. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Do you have no other means of backing up files?

    8. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      A commit is a special type of backup. You should have a real form of backup separate from the source code control. A commit should back up distinct versions of files, versions that you may want to revert to later or which document the evolution of the code or which add useful information to other people. As opposed to checking in just because you're heading to lunch, because that provides no additional information to people reviewing the commits, the code at that state is not worth saving for historical reasons.

      Sure this may sound very dogmatic, but the tools have a purpose that they are good at even though they may be contorted to be used for other purposes that they were never designed to perform.

      Think of it like a video game; it's rare to make a save game in the middle of combat or when falling to your doom, instead players like to put the save game at safe checkpoints before something risky or before making major decisions. Very rare will a player get the boss down to just a few hitpoints and then say "time for bed, I'll save right here and finish up the last ten seconds of the fight tomorrow". And yet I have seen people instinctively commit their work because it was time to go to a meeting.

    9. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Shados · · Score: 1

      Of course I do. This one has the nice side effect of easier collaboration than any other I can think of, though!

    10. Re:Commits code changes automatically by lgw · · Score: 1

      You're still thinking the old way. The bad way. The CVS way. Where "commit" means "check into a shared place". That's wrong.

      Commit just means "to that developer's private branch". Nothing more, Nothing interesting. It's only when changes are later merged into some common place that everything you're thinking of comes into play.

      Are you using some outdated version control system where branching or merging takes more than 2 seconds? Sure, then what you said above makes sense - party like it's 1999!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I've never used a system where private branch was 100% private and local and never included any history about it to the larger system. But then I wouldn't have to use it as I've got a backup system. I just don't see the need to make a commit before going to lunch. I may go weeks before checking in my changes.

    12. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a bad idea. People have already got into trouble when electronic documents that were distributed to the public turned out to have 'cruft' saved in the file (but not visible by normal means) that was sensitive. Anything which is going to auto-snapshot my interim work carries with it the risk of capturing something that I never intended to have captured and thereby opens the possibility of leaking information in ways that I couldn't anticipate.

      I, as the human being, need to be in control of when (and therefore, what) gets persisted to a storage medium.

    13. Re:Commits code changes automatically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never used a system where private branch was 100% private and local and never included any history about it to the larger system.

      Welcome to 2005! Remember to short the market and buy Apple stock around 2007.

  13. Correction by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    Surely you mean C-x C-s.

    1. Re:Correction by just_another_sean · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh god, please don't tell me this is going to be the year of the Emacs Desktop?

      If so I may just consider getting a job as a gardener....

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. He or she didn't say "year of the GNU/Linux Desktop"...

    3. Re:Correction by taikedz · · Score: 1

      No, they meant Ctrl-X , Y

      --
      -- "Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability." --Dijkstra
    4. Re:Correction by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      I can hardly wait for my EmacsBook!

    5. Re:Correction by just_another_sean · · Score: 2

      Hold out for the EmacsBook Pro, I hear it will have a bigger screen and the processor might, I say might, just be enough to keep up with Emacs.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    6. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emacs has gardening subroutines?

    7. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emacs has you covered with "M-x gardener-mode".

    8. Re:Correction by ld+a,b · · Score: 1

      a
      Ed is the standard text editor.
      .
      w
      q

      --
      10 little-endian boys went out to dine, a big-endian carp ate one, and then there were -246.
  14. Back in *my* day... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    ...control-S (XOFF) was used to pause the scrolling on a "dumb" CRT terminal. I don't think I have ever used it to save a document.

    Systems I care about (i.e. anything I use for "real work") are on UPSes. If the hardware or software is unstable enough that it crashes unexpectedly more often than once every couple of months (give or take), I fix/replace the hardware or start looking for alternative software to accomplish the same task.

  15. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Dimwit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's honestly the first thing I thought of. "Saving a document" to me is "Esc-:w".

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
  16. Ctrl-S? Ain't nobody got time for that! by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


    I'm busy F4'ing.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  17. You missed the biggest downside by DJ+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if I don't want to save my changes?

    "You can use the 'undo' command they say..."

    Yes but the undo command isn't persistent between applications, much less a power failure.

    You haven't solved anything, you've merely shifted the problem.

    1. Re:You missed the biggest downside by TuringTest · · Score: 0

      Shifted the problem from volatile to non-volatile memory? Give me that any day.

      The undo command ''can'' be made persistent between applications; there's no technical limitation why it shouldn't. In fact, version control is exactly the undo feature that you want. Using that, there's no rational reason to not want to save your changes.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    2. Re:You missed the biggest downside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they could do is not auto save to your actual file, but create a file with the same name with a .swp extension added. Then save changes to the .swp file. Then when you actually save the document, write those changes to the actual file.

      That way, if your application crashes or something, you could have a command line switch (maybe -r for recover) that would allow you to read in the contents of the .swp file and recover your work.

      Just an idea. I don't know if it is really viable to actually implement though. Maybe technology isn't there to support it.

    3. Re:You missed the biggest downside by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Auto-save typically saves to an alternate location and when you exit (or if you have a power failure, then next time you load) you are asked if you'd like to commit those changes to your actual document. This is true in office applications and video games, at least.

    4. Re:You missed the biggest downside by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      Yup. Autosave is only good with a version controlled document.

    5. Re:You missed the biggest downside by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      What if I don't want to save my changes?
      "You can use the 'undo' command they say..."
      Yes but the undo command isn't persistent between applications, much less a power failure.

      On OS X auto save is combined with versioning. So, yes, you can undo changes. Even after reboots.

  18. Auto-save is NOT your friend by ChrisC1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes, I don't want to save. I will open a document with the explicit purpose of making changes that I don't want saved. Even Gmail's autosave has burned me pretty badly. I spent an hour typing out a very long email. Toward the end of it, something happened, and the whole body of text was gone. I'm still not really sure if it was a keyboard shortcut I inadvertently triggered, browser bug, or what. But I just thought "no biggie... I'll just go back to the auto-saved version". So I open up the autosaved version, and the latest auto-save happened AFTER the email body was deleted. So much for autosave @#$!#$@!!!!

    1. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. Definitely a case of "please do what I asked for, not what you think I wanted". A properly implemented auto-save feature does not overwrite the original document; it saves a secondary copy, to be used only if the system crashes and you need to recover your edits.

    2. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      XCode auto-saves any changes you make (to the settings, the project layout, etc). Now I use git and make sure I've committed the whole project before making any changes because it's so easy to accidentally mess things up.

      So instead of making things easier, we've added complexity to work around complexity.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A properly implemented auto-save feature does not overwrite the original document; it saves a secondary copy, to be used only if the system crashes and you need to recover your edits.

      This is what MS Office does. Of course, no one here uses MS Office, so that's not much help...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how auto-save made your life worse here: if you lost your e-mail body and there was no auto-save, you would have lost it anyway. Unless your complaint is that the auto-save feature created an expectation for you that your e-mail would be there and then disappointed you when it wasn't (?).

    5. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by mmell · · Score: 2

      Agreed. After one or two unpleasant experiences, I got used to the habit of 1) load file, 2) immediately save file with new name, and 3) work. I.e., I was manually doing bastard RCS/SCCS.

    6. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by nephilimsd · · Score: 1

      The number of times that I open a document with the purpose of testing a change or providing information to someone in a what-if scenario that I really don't want saved is probably more than the number of times that I open a document with the purpose of actually changing anything. I work in a finance department, and a lot of our calculations are still done in Excel templates. If I don't have the option to close without saving, I am probably not using whatever office suite you are presenting me.

    7. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by ChrisC1234 · · Score: 1

      Had auto-save not been there, I would have manually saved it several times. But autosave makes you think that you don't need to worry about manually saving.

    8. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      With unlimited undo/redo (and saving of that), then perhaps you don't need the secondary copy. Doubt it's practical though for space/HD access reasons.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    9. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by butalearner · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, I don't want to save. I will open a document with the explicit purpose of making changes that I don't want saved. Even Gmail's autosave has burned me pretty badly. I spent an hour typing out a very long email. Toward the end of it, something happened, and the whole body of text was gone. I'm still not really sure if it was a keyboard shortcut I inadvertently triggered, browser bug, or what. But I just thought "no biggie... I'll just go back to the auto-saved version". So I open up the autosaved version, and the latest auto-save happened AFTER the email body was deleted.

      Ctrl-Z my friend. Undo works perfectly fine in many web forms (including Gmail) when you accidentally select a bunch of text and overwrite it. My wife almost cried when she thought she lost the text from a huge email to a relative she hadn't seen in a while, but luckily I was there when it happened or else she would have given up.

      I just tested it and undo works on Slashdot comment fields on IE, FF, and Chrome on Windows 7, and I know it works in Linux because I use it all the time at home.

    10. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      If the undo/redo history is reliably saved, then yes I agree. But if the application is crashing often enough that you care about this, do you trust the undo/redo history to get saved properly along with the document?

    11. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I try to have one good copy besides the one I'm working on, to cover bad autosaves (or dumb@$$ goofs on my part).

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    12. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But that wouldn't have helped the GP's problem, you have the saved version and the auto-saved recovery version. If you start a new email = no saved version, type up a bunch of stuff, it gets deleted through act of dog and auto-saved then that's gone in any system I know. Nothing here said he was saving drafts, he thought the auto-save would do it for him. The only other way I can think of to avoid that would be to store the whole sequence of key strokes and commit that to disk often so you'd have the undo history as well. And how often do you want it to write to the disk, after every key stroke? And do you really want everything you accidentally pasted or reconsidered writing stored? With documents not clearing it of all past edits before publishing it is often a source of much embarrassment, a full key logger is even worse.

      It's a last ditch resort because of some entirely unanticipated error condition or in case the whole system goes down outside your software's control - and for the OS maybe outside any software's control like power loss or bad hardware so you lose a minute or two's work instead of an hour. It's not meant as a lazy man's save function, if you use it as such you will get burned because the point is just to commit whatever's there right now, even if you're in the middle of something and it's completely inconsistent as it is, worse than both the old version and where you were going with the new one. If you want to have sane checkpoints to go back to, the answer is still to save. The auto-save is just to keep you from hitting Ctrl-S every minute in case something bad happens.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      A properly implemented auto-save feature does not overwrite the original document; it saves a secondary copy, to be used only if the system crashes and you need to recover your edits.

      This is what MS Office does. Of course, no one here uses MS Office, so that's not much help...

      Actually MS Office tries to do that, but more often than not when it crashes (while autosaving) it corrupts both the original document and the autosave backup.

      Nothing beats (1) timestamped backups or (2) manually versioning your file name (XXX1.doc,XXX2.doc,XXX3.doc) to preserve your thought evolution. Why? Because sometimes you want to go back to the last code version that you know worked (XXX42.doc).

      You don't want to search through hours/days/months of timestamped backups to figure out what version that was. Restore it, and then find out that it was the wrong version.

      All of the new autobackup features make it more difficult to manually control your file evolution. It's like they are trying to dumb your computer down into an ipad.

    14. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the undo/redo history is reliably saved, then yes I agree. But if the application is crashing often enough that you care about this, do you trust the undo/redo history to get saved properly along with the document?

      Actually, this is very easy. Just create a separate file when you open the document (many apps already do this in order to lock the file) and log all of your commands to it. It's hard to go wrong with this approach.

      (captcha: "protects")

    15. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Actually MS Office tries to do that, but more often than not when it crashes (while autosaving) it corrupts both the original document and the autosave backup.

      This has *NEVER* happened to me, under *very* heavy use in my work place. Never. Must be a problem on your end.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    16. Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      A properly implemented auto-save feature does not overwrite the original document; it saves a secondary copy, to be used only if the system crashes and you need to recover your edits.

      This is what MS Office does. Of course, no one here uses MS Office, so that's not much help...

      This is what Open Office and LibreOffice do as well.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  19. Drivel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but at the same time, we don't have that pause to take a moment and reflect on what we've written. I'm sure we've all had moments where our hands hover over a save/submit button before changing our minds and hammering the backspace key. Maybe now we'll have to think before we write.""

    Stop looking for deepness where there is none. Hover over a save button? No... save, then make changes and save again. Maybe over a submit button, but what the hell does that have to do with Ctrl-S? You're combining two completely different processes... saving a local file that you can save again as many times as you like with an irreversible submission process to try and create some depth to a non-story.

    1. Re:Drivel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the clever IDE also auto-commits the updated file to version control. so saving is the same as submitting.

  20. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Esc-ZZ

  21. What C-s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh geez. I thought the article was referring to the XON-XOFF protocol. I must be ancient :-(

    1. Re:What C-s? by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my initial thought too. But I've already come to terms with the fact that I'm ancient, so it didn't really bother me! ;-)

  22. I call bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just lost a doc yesterday because I forgot to save it... had opened it from an e-mail attachment just to glance...
    came back to desk later... closed word and POOF all gone...

    CTRL-S is not going anywhere...

  23. Wow, déjà vu by hubie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounded so familiar to me, but I can't believe it has been over eight years ago. I must be remembering a similar story posted much more recently.

    1. Re:Wow, déjà vu by OglinTatas · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Wow, déjà vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even in 2005 it was old news. I remember typing documents in the 90s in Word 6.0 for Windows 3.1 and it had an unobtrusive auto-save feature.

    3. Re:Wow, déjà vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unobtrusive, except that the whole application stopped, while the little autosave bar at the bottom ran across, before allowing the application to respond again.

    4. Re:Wow, déjà vu by Njovich · · Score: 1

      The comments back then were so much better that this link made me homesick for good old Slashdot. Still entertaining to read, but what happened?

  24. Re: Why is this on Slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly.
    I've also noticed that since I don't put birdseed in my bird feeder, less birds are in my yard.
    I miss the days when it was full and there were lots of birds.

  25. A relic of spinning rust by Schrockwell · · Score: 2

    Back in the day, I/O was dreadfully slow. Think about 5 1/4" and 3 1/2" floppy disks and slow hard disks, and how long it could take to save a document. I can still hear the clunking and whirring in my head as the little activity LED blinks and the operating system grinds to a halt.

    Now, with faster HDDs and even better SSDs, making "save" a separate, user-triggered operation doesn't make much sense. And with a jillion cores, you can easily offload the CPU work to do the saving to another thread so the UI isn't interrupted. Look at iOS - how many apps have a "save" button at all? It's expressly discouraged from the Human Interface Guidelines, and iOS users have been happily plugging along without it for years.

    I think the real shocker is why applications still have a 3 1/2" floppy disk as the save icon. It's just an anachronism now.

    1. Re:A relic of spinning rust by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I miss that old floppy "whirrrrr...chunk-chunk" noise :(

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    2. Re:A relic of spinning rust by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Now, with faster HDDs and even better SSDs, making "save" a separate, user-triggered operation doesn't make much sense.

      Of course it does. "Save" means "commit the set of changes I have made to this file". It's all well and good to have an separate auto-save (preferably incremental and saving several versions) to back up my work, but if I do a bunch of edits and then decide that I don't like the result and want to start over, I'm going to be pissed if I find that some moronic developer has destroyed my original document without my direction to do so.

      I think the real shocker is why applications still have a 3 1/2" floppy disk as the save icon. It's just an anachronism now.

      So is the light bulb icon used in many contexts, the phone handset icon on your phone, videocamera icons that look like 1990s camcorders, video playing software with a film icon...

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  26. Ha! No, it's not "safe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Save your work!' — This was a rallying cry for an entire generation of workers and students. ... My documents are automatically saved (with versioning) every time I make a change."

    That works great for students ... until they happen to pull their flash drive out of the USB socket at the moment it happens to be auto-saving, and their whole thesis document gets corrupted. Thankfully there are backups of anything important, right? Judging by the number of catastrophes I've directly observed in the computer labs around here, auto-save does nothing compared to thoughtful file naming (e.g., with the date in it), some understanding of where the files are going (local hard drive, external drive, or network drive) and a backup plan. Half the time students don't even know where the file is being saved, and simply "lose" it somewhere in the filesystem, or accidentally overwrite their new work with old work when copying files around.

    What you've got is not a generation of students that don't have to worry about control-S anymore, but a generation of students who are too clueless about how computers and file saving works to realize how bad their habits are. This will foil any attempt at automatically dealing with the problem. There is no technical solution for a bit of education about how it works, because current systems are not quite at the point where file organization doesn't matter. We're not there yet. Autosave is a crutch that isn't particularly helpful.

  27. Ctrl+S + Putty+VIM = Frozen Terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ctrl+S habit is actually a really bad one to have when you grew up doing reports in Word and then go to a job which is all coding in VIM via Putty, where Ctrl+S just causes your terminal to freeze.

  28. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

    :w

    --
    "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  29. OMG technology & progress made something obsol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... comparing a time when storage space was a limited resource and disc accesses would take quite a few seconds for just a few kbytes to today when write speeds are 30-300MB/s (even a few mb/s for wireless) and storage space is almost unlimited is worth an article?

    The only part of this that is newsworthy is how 'autosave' is more needed because computers & software have become less reliable over the years.

  30. Kids these days by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excuses that no longer work:

    My floppy disc isn't working
    My computer blue screened before I saved
    My e-mail was down
    I don't know why your computer can't read that format

    Every excuse I ever used to get a day's reprieve could not work now.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opening a .doc in a hex editor and randomising large chunks of it to buy yourself an extra day, that was my tried and tested method. Could still work I assume.

    2. Re:Kids these days by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Excuses that do work:

      I can't get into my account.
      The internet is down.
      What do you mean the .mp3 I renamed .doc isn't opening in word?

    3. Re:Kids these days by tepples · · Score: 2

      The new excuse is "I made a serious mistake, and it autosaved my mistake."

    4. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Print .doc to pdf as an image. I kept uploading to the online document plagiarizer thingy and it kept rejecting it. what do I do? it bought me an entire weekend!

    5. Re:Kids these days by gman003 · · Score: 1

      You need a new set of excuses:

      There was a storm and my 3G was down.
      The cloud was down. Again.
      An update patch broke everything.
      My laptop overheated and died, Applecare says they'll have it back by next week.
      Adobe's DRM junk decided I hadn't paid them enough money and locked out all my files.

    6. Re:Kids these days by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Just replace with: The cloud is down.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    7. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My e-mail was down" doesn't work only because everybody uses Gmail. When everybody's e-mail is down, nobody is late.

      I host my own e-mail service and have had better uptime these past several years than Gmail. Go figure. The sad part is that it doesn't matter. If Gmail is down, then everybody gets a pass. If my mail service was down, then people would ask why I wasn't using Gmail.

    8. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new excuse: "I'm hostage to incompetent software design"

  31. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

    Derr, nevermind. You were saying the same thing. The - threw me off.

    --
    "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  32. I hate this new paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be that I could open a file and muck with it and only when I decided the changes were worthy would I "save" or "save as" the file. But now before making any changes I have to decide what the future of the file is -- will this be a heavily modified copy, or a revision, or a scratchpad? What if I mess up and ruin the file -- does the version control work, can I get back to my old copy? When exactly was the document in that state I cared about? How fine grained is this autosave/version-control mechanism? Is it per character typed or line drawn? Having basic save points in a game is fine because the game designer chooses when they should occur and, frankly, its a game so replaying some aspect of a level isn't the end of the world. Its a totally different situation when you gotta figure out exactly where in deeply technical code/spreadsheets etc you need to (or have been forced to) revert to.

    In my opinion this move is a horrible thing. I hate it.

  33. Best mistake I ever made by mrhippo3 · · Score: 2

    Once upon a time in a far away land I was pounding away at my Apple ][. I forgot to save and lost an hour and a half of work. That was the best mistake I ever made. Since then I have always saved, made backup copies, sent the text to myself on email, written a CD/DVD, saved to a thumb drive, and so on. An hour and a half was a very cheap loss to have, if I was forever safe thereafter.

    Autosave still has not cured me. I will still CTRL-S every few lines. Even with autosave on CAD I will still do other saves. Still, my paranoia does save me.

    Not so long ago, I discovered that several years of engineering files had been vanished. We had paper copies but still that loss was annoying.Turns out that I had made a backup of that file set and it was found in my home cache of "work" disks. I slept better.

  34. Why would anyone do this? by jittles · · Score: 2

    No longer do we have to have constant interruptions to worry about whether our changes are saved

    Why would you interrupt your flow of work to save a document? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. What I got into the habit of doing was hitting Ctrl-S after each thought. The thought was then saved and I thinking about what to write next anyway. Autosave doesn't know when I actually want to commit my changes and it could happen in the middle of an edit (say cut and paste to move some text around). If I lost power at that time I would rather have the unedited version of the document than the one with my precious text cut out of it and then lost in the event of a power failure.

  35. You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple users don't Control, they Command you insensitive clod!

  36. Welcome to the 1980's... by kylemonger · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... when GNU Emacs had auto-saving and backup versioning at any keystroke granularity you liked thirty years ago. Next we celebrate the boon of split screen editing.

    1. Re:Welcome to the 1980's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      split screen editing

      Is that like when you drop your iPad?

  37. Games: Autosave is the devil by Impish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Games that autosave only on checkpoints is a hangover from old consoles that didn't have the memory to allows gamers to save when they wanted to. Why this horrible restriction continues to perpetuate to modern PC games is beyond me. It's a throwback and it's annoying.

    I can hear some people saying "It forces suspense in the game! You don't know when the next safe place is!". If you want that kind of suspense, let the game auto save for you. Personally if supper is ready I don't want to have to tell my wife "Wait, I know there must be an auto save waypoint around here somewhere, hold on while I play for another 5 - 10 minutes looking for it!" I want to hit cntl-s, quit, and go have supper.

    Is it so hard to put 'save when you want' in to a game?

    end-of-rant

    1. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most games have this kind of save system because it continues from console games and PC exclusive games (or good ports) are very rare these days.

    2. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want that kind of suspense, let the game auto save for you. Personally if supper is ready I don't want to have to tell my wife "Wait, I know there must be an auto save waypoint around here somewhere, hold on while I play for another 5 - 10 minutes looking for it!" I want to hit cntl-s, quit, and go have supper.

      Or, you know, you could just hit Esc and pause it.

    3. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The question equally applies to games on any even remotely-recent console...

    4. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Impish · · Score: 1

      If you want that kind of suspense, let the game auto save for you. Personally if supper is ready I don't want to have to tell my wife "Wait, I know there must be an auto save waypoint around here somewhere, hold on while I play for another 5 - 10 minutes looking for it!" I want to hit cntl-s, quit, and go have supper.

      Or, you know, you could just hit Esc and pause it.

      I have no interest in leaving my gaming rig running for an hour (or possibly more if conversation gets interesting) sucking back electricity, heating up my back room and possibly playing whatever hold music the game has. Allowing a save, I would think, is simple. Unless somebody with more knowledge explains why it is hard I'll just blame it on cheap console ports.

      Speaking of which, I bought Dead Space on Steam when it came on sale but due to the horrible, horrible console port and controls I haven't been able to play them :(

    5. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by EvanED · · Score: 2

      I can hear some people saying "It forces suspense in the game! You don't know when the next safe place is!".

      What I think would be an ideal compromise if you want to make a game that you can only save at checkpoints is to allow saves anywhere, but you can only ever load an arbitrary save once. It suffices for the "I need to take a break" use case while still preventing save scumming, which I'd argue can definitely have implications beyond personal well just don't save if you don't like it "ethics".

    6. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by tepples · · Score: 1

      Games that autosave only on checkpoints is a hangover from old consoles that didn't have the memory to allows gamers to save when they wanted to. Why this horrible restriction continues to perpetuate to modern PC games is beyond me.

      Probably because it'd be an excessive frame rate hit to serialize hundreds of megabytes of data structures in a game every 5 seconds. You'd have to make everything copy-on-write and essentially dedicate a core just to building and writing the save file.

    7. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      happened to me playing Diablo 3 while I was halfway through a long quest. Couldn't find an automatic save point so I logged out. I did unlock the teleport waypoint at the beginning of the new zone though. Still, had to restart the one long quest all over again - kill the monsters and help the soldiers.

    8. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, bollocks. Dark Souls saves constantly with no issue. Its not like the program needs to keep every pixel of the armor you're wearing in the save file.

    9. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf. Just pause the game during the explicit save in that case.

      It is also because dev don't want to have to serialize the whole state of the world, so they just save "user is at start of mission 4 with that inventory and that stats".

    10. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      First, because with many games that can reduce the challenge, which is seen as bad. EG save after you win each sub-stage of a boss fight, etc. Personally, I find it rather silly; either let me save wherever I want (manually) or don't let me save at all (a la roguelikes.)

      --
      Not a sentence!
    11. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Impish · · Score: 1

      Games that autosave only on checkpoints is a hangover from old consoles that didn't have the memory to allows gamers to save when they wanted to. Why this horrible restriction continues to perpetuate to modern PC games is beyond me.

      Probably because it'd be an excessive frame rate hit to serialize hundreds of megabytes of data structures in a game every 5 seconds. You'd have to make everything copy-on-write and essentially dedicate a core just to building and writing the save file.

      Why would it need to serialize all that data every five seconds? I'm truly curious. I've stopped the game to save it, this brings up the 'save to' menu and you wait a couple seconds while it does the save (gather data, write to disk), then go back to the game. If it is a complicated game with lots and lots of information (e.g. Skyrim, how *do* they keep track of all those quest lines?) I can see a long save time, if it is a FPS I don't see why it would take so long. Even the PC standard F5 for 'quick save' can put up a 'Saving' message while it is going on so the frame rate doesn't matter, you aren't doing anything while it is saving.

      I can see your point if the gamer expects the save to happen in the background, a la 'save point', while they continue to run around in game and do things. But I don't see why this should have an impact when I've decided to go to the save screen.

    12. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Hell, even the PSone had games that let you save anytime, anywhere. Im not sure but I'm thinking the SNES had a couple too (The SNES version of Might and Magic III for example) It's a design decision for the most part, not a design limitation.

    13. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why would it need to serialize all that data every five seconds? I'm truly curious.

      So that it saves in the background without your needing to have "stopped the game to save it".

      I can see your point if the gamer expects the save to happen in the background

      That's exactly what I meant. There are some games where the player is expected to live with the consequences of each choice rather than quickloading out of every sticky situation. In such a game, the alternative to continuous background autosave is not allowing a save at all unless it's a save and quit, and deleting the save when it is loaded.

    14. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It prevents a game-design exploit where the player saves every time they do anything successfully, and then continuously reloads until they successfully complete the next objective, thus eliminating any possibility of failure cost. Games with no failure cost aren't fun, but players are motivated to circumvent this anyway. This is the fundamental contradiction at the heart of game design: given a choice, players will do things to increase their probability of success until there is no chance of them losing, which will in the end make the game boring. Allowing saves only at specific locations is one of a variety of tools to prevent this particular exploit.

    15. Re:Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could save whenever you wanted, such mechanism would rampantly be used for cheating.

  38. First noticed this in Google Docs by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    For public work docs we put together. I was trying to hit "Alt+F, S" to save everything for quite a while.

    I personally don't like the change because not every piece of software behaves that way (yet), and that leads to confusion.

    I also like having control over what is saved and when for a reason. Maybe I don't want some server having every thought I've ever had (and then deleted later because it was a bad idea, such as an angry email you never sent) stored somewhere in "Big Data". Imagine the psychological profile that someone could build about you with everything you ever typed anywhere in any Google product, Facebook, Twitter, etc...

    With that said, I get why most people don't have such paranoid thoughts. It's all about convenience.

    1. Re:First noticed this in Google Docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pause the game and go eat? Find a save point after dinner?

      Usually save points in games are intentional to maintain balanced game play. Not every game flow lends itself well to on the spot saves.
      Consider a game where you have to jump across a series of platforms - if you can save every time you succeed then it removes the challenge. Just save every time you successfully make a jump. Whereas a checkpoint makes sure that if you miss a jump you have to start all over again.

  39. Inspiration! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many years ago, I lost some changes in a vi clone named "stevie". The real vi saved your changes automatically by the simple (and at the time necessary) method of using a file to store your edit buffer, but stevie used an in-memory edit buffer. After it losing enough changes from that, I decided to write my own vi clone, "elvis", which also used a file to store the edit buffer. This was very handy in the early days of Minix (predecessor to Linux) which had only a 64K address space per process -- it allowed you to edit text files larger than 64K, oooooh!

    1. Re:Inspiration! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago, I lost some changes in a vi clone named "stevie". The real vi saved your changes automatically by the simple (and at the time necessary) method of using a file to store your edit buffer, but stevie used an in-memory edit buffer. After it losing enough changes from that, I decided to write my own vi clone, "elvis", which also used a file to store the edit buffer. This was very handy in the early days of Minix (predecessor to Linux) which had only a 64K address space per process -- it allowed you to edit text files larger than 64K, oooooh!

      You're Steve Kirkendall?? I used to edit in elvis when I ran slackware a few years ago. thanks!

    2. Re:Inspiration! by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Steve? Is that you? Slackware still carries elvis ;-) Thank you.

  40. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by nblender · · Score: 0

    There are several issues here. I am offended that some operating systems have hijacked ascii characters to use for meta functionality... ie: ^C, ^V, ^S... ie: I want the same copy/paste key sequences in all of my apps, but I can't have that. I can't remap firefox to use Alt-C/Alt-V for copy/paste or Alt-T for 'new tab'... For those of us who live/work/survive in terminal windows, we want a consistant user interface... This consistancy is (for the most part ) on OS X.

    But in terms of the article in question, yeah.. What I really want is more disconnect between my editing window and my compiler/debugger.

  41. Elder Scrolls by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Obviously this guy isn't a fan of Bethesda games, if he thinks so highly of autosave.

    Just wait until you lose an hour of progress because you didn't save before getting smoked by a high-level troll at the bottom of that dungeon.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  42. rubbish by rewindustry · · Score: 2

    ctrl-S is still alive and well and suspending most things.

    1. Re:rubbish by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

      I used to tell one of co-workers "X-OFF!" to get him to shut up.

    2. Re:rubbish by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*. It was a joke.

    3. Re:rubbish by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      ctrl-S is still alive and well and suspending most things.

      Yup. Drives me nuts that linux generally uses scroll lock to do the same thing. Guess what key my KVM uses to switch connections? Oh, and as an added bonus many programs halt when the scrollback buffer becomes full, which I think can include the kernel if it is trying to write to it.

    4. Re:rubbish by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've been pronouncing it wrong all these years.

  43. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Did this just happen?

    Ctrl-S/Ctrl-Q still work in my terminal windows. I'm not sure how useful it is as my response time can be slow enough that it doesn't usually let me stop the text display in time when I see something I want to take a closer look at. (Setting up a whopping big scrollback memory helps with that, though.)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  44. That's the way I like it by jovius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Undo levels to zero, no saving. Live in the moment, on the edge. No turning back, it's all in.

    1. Re:That's the way I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the only copy of the current edit is in your video RAM.

    2. Re:That's the way I like it by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Also there's an electron gun pointed at your tower that triggers based on a geiger counter. The suspense!

      All we need now is to involve a cat and poison somehow.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  45. Wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a command we can use? I usually just hover the mouse at the top and click the big save button.

  46. I guess this joke is now obsolete, then... by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

    Jesus and Buddha sit down for a typing contest. Both are given a lengthy paper document, and have to type it into their respective computers. The contest starts, and they're neck-and-neck the whole way. When they're both almost done, a lightning bolt comes down from the sky, and both computers crash. Who wins the contest? Jesus, of course. Jesus saves.

    1. Re:I guess this joke is now obsolete, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buddha does incremental backups though..

    2. Re:I guess this joke is now obsolete, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddha doesn't save because he knows material possessions are a trap that causes suffering. Though the real winner is Thor.

  47. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Only if you're finished. If you're still working but want to save your progress, :w is what you want.

  48. *Crash* by pinkj · · Score: 1

    I was writing a long winded post about how the days of 'ctrl-s'ing every 10 seconds are finally gone, but I lost it all after my computer crashed.

  49. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK, you are retarded. Shut the fuck up, you idiot. Die in a fire.

  50. lol @ webforms by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    Many webforms will save drafts of whatever data I'm entering

    But not slashdot.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  51. Take your own advice by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Maybe now we'll have to think before we write.

    The very act of externalizing something is part of the writing process. The idea that one who might think it all out and then type/code/compose/whatever a perfectly formed document/program/concerto/whatever only really exists in the imaginary Mozart that lives in Peter Schaffer's mind.

    Besides, I prefer to save my work at defined points. Just because the system can recreate what I was doing where I left off before that dead battery/power failure/segfault/system crash/emergency phone call doesn't necessarily mean I can.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  52. Maybe now we'll have to think before we write by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 0

    I sometimes wish there was a CTRL-S in real life. I often times speak before I think. My colleagues seem to appreciate my unfiltered honesty. At least that's what they tell me. My wife on the other hand, not so much sometimes.

  53. Disagree by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    I hate autosave. Its one of the first things I turn off in any editor.

    Over many years I have developed an optimal workflow of trying changes and only saving when I'm completely happy with it, so by not saving I can easily go back to the last good version.

    Autosave that saves at regular time periods or whatever totally ruins that. I don't want earlier versions automatically overwritten, especially with work-in-progress changes, nor do I want multiple versions saved so I then have the hassle of figuring out *which* version to go back to, and possibly on-top all the manual housekeeping of regularly having to manually clear out multiple old versions.

    1. Re:Disagree by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Autosave that saves at regular time periods or whatever totally ruins that. I don't want earlier versions automatically overwritten, especially with work-in-progress changes

      No decently implemented autosave would overwrite your manually saved version without asking. That's an implementation flaw (admittedly seeming to become more common these days). But most applications that have that flaw these days don't even give you a choice -- it simply saves periodically, and you live with it. You often can't turn it off.

      nor do I want multiple versions saved so I then have the hassle of figuring out *which* version to go back to

      I think you're confusing "autosave" with "incremental backup." Unless you have something specially configured, autosave generally implies saving ONE version of a document periodically (perhaps, as I mentioned above, one TEMP version, as opposed to the more permanent manually saved version).

      In either case, the only time you should ever have to choose is when your application or computer crashes. And if your application/computer is crashing often enough that this is a significant concern -- I think you need a new application/computer.

      and possibly on-top all the manual housekeeping of regularly having to manually clear out multiple old versions.

      Again, this sounds like bad implementation to me, and again this should be an incredibly rare occurrence unless you have continuous crashes. When it does occur, a decent application these days should warn you when you open a file that there are multiple saved versions -- and usually there are only two. Generally, your choice is between what you last saved manually and the last autosave. You make a quick choice, and the application should delete the other version automatically.

      I can't really imagine why any other implementation would be desirable, except in very unusual situations. Why would ANYONE want their system that was doing autosave every 10 minutes to have 30 different copies of the same file at various stages after 5 hours of editing... and would then require you to clean them out manually? (Yes, I'm sure someone can come up with an unusual situation where this is warranted, but it's certainly not common or like most autosave implementations.)

  54. Should have been first post by Dishwasha · · Score: 4, Funny

    I totally had first post on this one, but I found out I actually have to click both a preview button and submit button for it to save to this forum.

  55. UPS by tepples · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage. I just had one last night.

    Your laptop's battery or your desktop's UPS should have kept the machine running long enough for an orderly shutdown.

    1. Re:UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, obviously he wasn't using a laptop or had a battery that couldn't hold a charge or he was using a desktop without a UPS or the UPS failed. Doesn't change the fact that power outages make you lose work under those circumstances.

      Are you some kind of a presumptuous fucking nigger faggot? Are you so intentionally obtuse in person? How do you function within society?

      Hypothetically, what would your response have been if he said, "Well, I was working on my document and my house blew right the fuck up! Gas leak, and I lit a cigarette. I was thrown from the blast miraculously unharmed, but my PC was destroyed. As well as the laptop and battery. And the UPS."

      Would you faggot brain explode with all the possibilities? That wouldn't have happened if: Your gas wasn't leaking, you didn't have a cold and could smell it, you didn't smoke, you had an explosion proof barrier around your PC/laptop, you had an explosion proof barrier around your UPS...

      Where does it end, tepples? Are you just a winy little nigger fag that isn't accepted among society?

    2. Re:UPS by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I've had a UPS on three of my systems since 2000. The main thing it's fixing is the dirty power damaging my equipment. I haven't had a hardware failure in 14 years.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    3. Re:UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Issues. You have them.

    4. Re:UPS by ildon · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly believe the average user has a UPS? Or that they never try to use their laptop away from an outlet at very low battery life? These kinds of assumptions are what make for bad user experiences.

    5. Re:UPS by tepples · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly believe the average user has a UPS?

      The average user doesn't know not to click pop-up ads for fake antivirus. That's why so many people feel comfortable with an "app store" experience like that of iOS or the game consoles, because it protects the average user from himself.

      Or that they never try to use their laptop away from an outlet at very low battery life?

      A laptop with an almost discharged battery will cause a sane operating system to pop up "Charge is running low. Save your work now." followed by hibernation a couple minutes later.

    6. Re:UPS by ildon · · Score: 1

      The average user doesn't know not to click pop-up ads for fake antivirus. That's why so many people feel comfortable with an "app store" experience like that of iOS or the game consoles, because it protects the average user from himself.

      It's not relevant that those users are ignorant or don't make any effort to protect themselves. They're still users and they still deserve a positive user experience. Autosave helps them have that positive user experience. Antiviruses help them have that positive user experience. Windows features that help protect them from themselves (but annoy the hell out of informed power users) help them have that positive user experience. Using software should be as easy as using a microwave or driving a car. People don't have to know how those machines work, mechanically or theoretically, or how to fix them, in order to have positive user experiences with them and use them as tools to accomplish their goals. Software should be the same way.

  56. Been using it by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    since it was Commodore-s on GEOS.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  57. Re: Why is this on Slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool bird trick.

  58. CTRL-History Cool things happen all the time! by dschnur · · Score: 1

    ...but no we have automobile correct on our spilling.

    Ok, seriously, what we are seeing is just another incremental step in mass-computing. One of the many millions of cool things that have happened since the beginning of computing.

    Years ago (Pre-Fidonet), one of the almost daily "Big Things" was that you could actually have a "Disk Operating System" where you didn't have to type call -151, then c600g to actually load a program. No Play on Tape. Just turn the computer on. It was cool.

    If we go further back, no punch cards (before my time), and no acoustic couplers (also before my time). Must've been cool!

    Still, management tools aside, if only there was a switch/router operating system that maintained automatic revisions at the command-line.

  59. Autosave caused me to lose work by tepples · · Score: 1

    Autosave without revert bit me years ago. Before I could afford a "real" laptop (which cost several times as much then as they do now), I was trying to use NewtonWorks on an Apple MessagePad 2000 as a substitute. I lost work when I accidentally removed a lot of text and it decided to autosave. Worse, that program had only one level of undo, with Cmd+Z toggling between "Undo" and "Redo". That doesn't help if you make a mistake and then do something else after your mistake.

  60. I recently replayed th GameCube's Eternal Darkness by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

    It didn't even occur to me that there would be no auto-save until my character died about an hour into the game. I don't think I own any game from the past several years that does not auto-save.

  61. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by tepples · · Score: 0

    Earth to APK: Please do not duplicate your comment in replies to every single other post by a user.

  62. i like manual save by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Not sure which IDE "automatically commits". You probably can configure most of them to do it but does it do it smartly? I don't want to have to sort through a commit for every keystroke or one made at every arbitrary point (like every 5min). What is the chances it will compile? What are the chances any commit will have a complete step? I suppose you could trigger it from build events or better from when your unit tests run and pass but that wouldn't be automatic any more. Similar for word processors.

  63. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmm needs more bold and italics pls

  64. Can you undo a change you made before a reboot? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look at iOS - how many apps have a "save" button at all? It's expressly discouraged from the Human Interface Guidelines

    With no Save, how do you Revert? Or do Apple's Human Interface Guidelines for iOS expect applications to offer unlimited undo/redo that persists across reboots of the device?

    1. Re:Can you undo a change you made before a reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, and the same people who made those devices also found it absolutely necessary to restrict you from uploading arbitrary files to websites.

      Idiot decision making pretending to be done for "user friendliness" doesn't make it less idiotic when you need (or need to turn it off) the feature.

  65. Random file-damaging crashes? by xandos · · Score: 1

    There is still one program where I regularly regret not using ctrl-s often enough. Mathematica.

  66. Roguelikes by tepples · · Score: 1

    Obviously CanHasDIY doesn't play roguelikes. Roll a new character and start over.

    1. Re:Roguelikes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      "But I've already got 220 hours in on this one!" lol.

      Honestly, I think I've started about 50 different games of Oblivion, and finished maybe 1.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  67. It's always Control-S! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  68. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by ejasons · · Score: 1

    I am offended that some operating systems have hijacked ascii characters to use for meta functionality

    That is one of the very nice things about MacOS X -- since it uses the Command (clover) key for menu shortcuts, that leaves the Control key sequences available for emacs-style editing commands, which work almost everywhere.

    Under Linux, I'm never sure whether Control-F will move forward, or bring up the "Search" dialog...

  69. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth to tepples: Don't feed the trolls, you tool.

  70. But where does it go? by eastjesus · · Score: 1

    Ctrl-S was always for pausing the display, I didn't know it was also saving anything - must have been some social engineering on the part of the NSA to make it save my work also. In any case, I prefer saving things at the points of my choosing on my own media. The real issue today is where does it save it? It's one thing to have a temp copy on hardware and media in your possession but something entirely more ominous if all the steps in your works-in-progress are being journaled forever in some corporate or government database entirely outside of your control or knowledge with only the appearance of "it's just a copy for your own good."

  71. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This wasn't an APK post. You dumb fuck. Any idiot can see that's not his writing style.

  72. Nope by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    My XBox 360 had an autosave to cloud function. Only then that copy became corrupt. There were no other cloud copies. I had to start the game all over again after putting in many, many hours. I learned to periodically rotate between save multiple checkpoints to disk and periodically save to cloud.

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a new mod category: "First World Problems"

    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we'd need another one called "Thinks 'First World Problems' is an intelligent thing to say", and that's just too unwieldly to put in a dropdown.

  73. CTRL+S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone else takes 2d8 damage

  74. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  75. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by praxis · · Score: 1

    When did it stop meaning that. I just pressed ctrl-S and my output was suspended. I pressed ctrl-q and it resumed.

  76. XOFF Ignored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XOFF ignored, mumble mumble.

  77. Games: Autosave is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes.. cuz they don't want you saving at a point just before a boss for example...
    so you can keep farming him until you get the drop you want... or...
    so you don't return to a certain point after dying...

  78. Arrogance of saving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be realistic here. Most of the time the document you are saving is crap, no need to save at all. Just move on, nothing to see here.

  79. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    If your terminal window is connected to a Unix-like system, this would be true. The TTY sub-system scans each character typed and if the flow control characters are found, output is paused/resumed. (depending upon your stty/termio settings, of course; IXOFF must be enabled. If IXANY is also enabled, then any character will resume data flow.)

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  80. Autosave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Autosave has been a standard feature of every editor I have used for decades and the first thing I do is disable it.

    There are a variety of reasons for this depending on software. Weird temporary files littering folders. Wasting time/bandwidth. Freak outs when replacing storage or network interruptions. Not wanting contents of temporary markups written anywhere.

    I understand people find these features useful yet I see no value in it.. saving requires no conscious effort.

    More importantly TFA's version control theme is lame. Why would you version control all intermediate garbage? This would seem to me to be extremely counterproductive for cases where revision history is to be at all useful.

  81. What is a Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this 'desktop' relate to frames, windows and buffers?

  82. In my day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had to chuckle at the "In my day" reference. Those of us old enough to have started our careers on mainframes already had autosave features, decades ago. It wasn't until these Fisher-Price PCs came along that such functionality disappeared. I love how all these young propeller-heads think that autosave is a recent phenomenon. Welcome to 1980, you awesome computer wizards.

  83. re: MS Office and auto-save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but this helps illustrate the reason I dislike people learning to rely on "auto save" or "auto recovery" features.
    If you've ever done support in a corporate settings for MS Office, you're undoubtedly run across people who claim one of the products crashed in the middle of using it, and they're unable to recover their work after the machine was rebooted.

    Initially, everyone says, "No worries! Office auto-saves a copy to recover from in case of a crash!" -- and it does, except when it doesn't because whatever went wrong clobbered the portion of the code that was supposed to do the auto-saving (or some sort of network issue prevented getting a good auto-save on a shared folder it was targeted to save on).

    At least with a known requirement that you either save your work, or you'll risk losing it -- saving tends to be a task the user pays more attention to. If the save fails due to a disk full error or anything else, they immediately see the correlation. "I just hit save, and this error popped up. That tells me the error is definitely related to the saving process I just tried to do - and I better figure out what went wrong, or my stuff won't be saved!" The auto save may generate errors too, but users tend to just find them annoyances interrupting their work on the document at hand, not realizing they're related to the auto-save failing.....

  84. Goodbye Ctrl-S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hallo :w

  85. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I still use Ctrl-S for that purpose occasionally. The rest of the time Ctrl-S is bound to isearch by default. I was honestly confused about what Ctrl-S meant in this article until I realized it is what Notepad used.

  86. mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  87. mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  88. mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  89. Kids these days by billy3 · · Score: 2

    Well now we have "my dog at my mobile device".

  90. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there's no bold. Geez.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  91. I don't always want to autosave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a designer and most of the time when I'm starting a new design for a specific client, I open an older file and use it as a starting point. I hate the idea of autosaves overwriting my OLD work when all I really wanted to do was use it as a starting point. I guess I'll just have to consciously save the new file as soon as the older file is opened. I don't welcome this change.

  92. What does this have to do with the current thread? by mmell · · Score: 0
    Y'know, I'd love to lay claim to some prophetic or oracular power in predicting your off-the-deep-end response, but it was obvious even to casual observers.

    Can't you at least come up with something original?

  93. What, is Ctrl-R so hard? by utoddl · · Score: 1

    I've been using computers for over 30 years and have never once used this keystroke.

    Is it telling that I ran across this article twice and both times thought "What's the problem? just hit Ctrl-R and get on with it!" Now what's this "application" you speak of?

  94. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by mmell · · Score: 0
    A mistake I owned up to, and the result of your post-stalking.

    Will you own up to your mistake? I'm sure that when you were young, Mommy always told you it wasn't your fault nobody at school liked you. Now, you're perfectly certain that you've done nothing wrong, so I'm guessing "no". You're incapable of the emotional maturity such an act would take. Your entire ego is based on the idea that everything is someone else's fault. Seriously, did Daddy abuse you physically, or just emotionally?

  95. Even more obscure? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Even more obscure: ESC, Transfer, Save.

    Still using it. Thanks, Charles.

    --
    I come here for the love
  96. This must not be a computer geek site any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASCII Device Control 3, 0x13, Ctrl-S is pretty unlikely to go away before the rest of the ASCII code does.

  97. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by mmell · · Score: 1
    So you'll be suing me soon, right? That's what you do, isn't it?

    I'm guessing that the law and the courts aren't as kind as your Mommy. They won't hold you close and listen to your crying, assuring you that it's all those mean kids' fault, will they? Tell ya what - have your Mommy post here about how her little darling committed suicide because of all us mean people drove him to it. You've done it before. Only - have her do it with a registered account this time. I could almost think you posted that yourself.

  98. App Context is Important to Saving Functionality by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I appreciate Office applications saving pretty often.

    But Crtl-S and Crtl-Alt-S (Save all Files) in Visual Studio are bread and butter to me.

    I recently UXed a metadata explorer for the iSeries mainframe (Winform app), and it initially autosaved every change the user made (after validation of course). All three initial testers either asked how to save or if the data was being saved.

    We updated the application, putting a Save button (that turns red when a data value is changed) on the main form (and a menu option - File->Save, and Ctrl-S support - three ways to save) and the issues went away (we add various "Save your work" steps to the UX script).

    Some apps are expected to save incrementals (via user experience if nothing else), others are not. UX, I believe, is the key to determining where auto-save is appropriate. I specifically learned that auto-save and database analysis software don't go together...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  99. Since when do IDEs autosave _and_ version? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 2

    M2C thats really scary, first I dont want everything I type saved, secondly I prefer my commit-log not to be spammed to oblivion.

  100. C-x C-s by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

    I'm used to just randomly hitting Ctrl+X then Ctrl+S in emacs when I pause and my fingers have nothing better to do. Semi-frequently, I do this in other applications without even realising I just did it, with various mildly weird results...

  101. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Bigbutt · · Score: 0

    Humorously with all the posts I'm going to associate APK with little boy porn for a while now. :-/

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  102. mmell caught ac post "supporting himsefl" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFLMAO http://slashdot.org/comments.p... You're a fool that projected his own modus operandi doing it no less.

  103. mmell BIG mistake (ac supporting himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFLMAO http://slashdot.org/comments.p... You're a fool that projected his own modus operandi doing it no less.

  104. mmell doing ac posts to "support himself" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFLMAO http://slashdot.org/comments.p... You're a fool that projected his own modus operandi doing it no less.

  105. Interestingly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The newest version of Blender just added a feature to tell you if you have unsaved work before exiting the program. Before, it would just exit without any kind of warning. Blender used to be very crash-prone and in recent versions it's been far more stable, and this has led to less stringent saving practices of new users, and much work has been lost. Now that it reminds you 'hey, you didn't actually save this thing', it's a little more difficult to toss away 5-6 hours of modeling work just by clicking the little X.

  106. My IDE commits code changes automatically. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> My IDE commits code changes automatically.

    Really? Checks into source control as you type? Builds if you stop typing? What? (I know what Visual Studio and Eclipse do...what ARE you using?)

  107. Because C-x C-s is the key! by gentryx · · Score: 1

    Emacs FTW!

    --
    Computer simulation made easy -- LibGeoDecomp
  108. The "younger generation" uses desktop apps? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    A LOT of content these days is saved on the web. I type a lot of things on the web now, and lose quite a bit because often times there's no save feature at all, just post. At any time I could want to reference another browser window, have the browser crash, or accidentally close the window and lose everything I'm typing. That happens a lot, and I doubt I'm the only one.

    In fact, with the web I lose a LOT more than I ever did 20 years ago, since the save features are rare, and auto-save is non-existent. I find myself using desktop apps less and less. Why would I open up Word for instance? The last time I used a word processor was editing my resume. Even that's a little anachronistic, but there's currently not a good alternative.

    And no, I'm not even "the younger generation". But the point being, the web hasn't caught up to the desktop at all in terms of not losing content.

    --
    AccountKiller
  109. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    There are several issues here. I am offended that some operating systems have hijacked ascii characters to use for meta functionality... ie: ^C, ^V, ^S... ie: I want the same copy/paste key sequences in all of my apps, but I can't have that. I can't remap firefox to use Alt-C/Alt-V for copy/paste or Alt-T for 'new tab'... For those of us who live/work/survive in terminal windows, we want a consistant user interface... This consistancy is (for the most part ) on OS X.

    Well, the Apple/Command key is really just a meta key in the end. It's just that Apple realized it should be used for shortcuts.

    Of course, Microsoft didn't have that luxury as IBM decided to make a keyboard without a meta key for their PCs, and thus some bright spark at Microsoft decided to use Ctrl-C/V/X/Z instead.

    It's so bad that Ctrl-V is remapped to Ctrl-Q on the Windows version of Vim.

    Anyhow, I think autosave is nice, but only coupled with Apple's implementation of it. Basically it versions each autosave so you can go back in time and see it how it was at various stages, including being able to cut/copy/paste from the old version to the new.

    Because otherwise, autosave is handy when your computer or the app crashes, but you can lose a lot of state information when you just have the current working copy saved.

  110. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2

    (Setting up a whopping big scrollback memory helps with that, though.)

    One of my biggest gripes with most modern terminals, the scrollback buffer is uselessly small in the default configuration. Mac OS X is the only system where I don't feel the need to modify it literally the first time I do "cat /var/log/something"

    Memory is not an issue for a graphical terminal on a desktop. There's no good reason for terminals to be defaulting to 200 lines anymore.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  111. but.. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Google!

    If Google queefed slashdot would have it's nose instantly up Google's vagina, inhaling as much as physically possible.

  112. Re:CTRL-History Cool things happen all the time! by msauve · · Score: 1

    "you didn't have to type call -151, then c600g to actually load a program."

    That booted DOS from a drive attached to slot 6. PR#6 was easier.

    To run from tape, you did "LOAD", then "RUN" in BASIC.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  113. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    As Mr. Miyagi might have said, X On, X Off.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  114. No more flow control? by l2718 · · Score: 1

    Ctrl-S stops text from scrolling on my terminal. I don't see how auto save helps with that.

  115. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what ? it still works in tty.

  116. Why the call them 'NonStop'.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The standard editor on Tandem NonStop machines (Tedit) to this day is a 'live save' editor with an infinite undo buffer that saves every keystroke to multiple file write processes across multiple CPUs. When you really, really need the code you're writing to be available. AFAIK, it's been this way since the NonStop II circa 1981.

  117. Save as you type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reflect on what you've written when you commit.

  118. But can I still use XOFF? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I would be lost without it.

  119. Is there a point to this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there really a point to this crappy article? Other than to state the the author is lazy shit and feels that his opinions rule over everyone elses?

    Get a life you loser! AND SLASHDOT, either get something worth reporting on or just don't publish this shit.

  120. ZZ or :wq by schlpbch · · Score: 1

    That's how it always has been and always will be.

  121. Only MS Office by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I work without fear of losing progress in all of the numerous applications I use (pedestrian, scientific, graphical, audio, etc.).

    This is with the singular exception of MS Office Applications. They still crash and lose one's input on a regular basis. I save after every sentence I type. This is a behavior developed through many agonizing losses thanks to buggy MS apps. PPT will still corrupt its own files, so I end up with 10-20 versions of the same presentation, simply out of fear for PPT mangling its own files.

    NOTE: I have no choice but to use MS Office Apps, as everyone else does.

  122. Autosave crashed on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a really awful day today .. when all work was down my Office crashed and I lost some of my work and I had to deliver all in a few minutes. Ctrl+s is a habit we must keep :)

    Ciprip
    www.consultantahr.ro

  123. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your're still using "Esc"? ctrl-c is where the money is (one more keystroke, but closer to home row)

  124. Sore loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whaaa whaaa whaaaa. Mouse >>>>>> Keyboard. End of story. You lost bro. Come to grips with it!

    1. Re:Sore loser by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      My day-to-day usage tells a different tale. You want to stand by and time me opening, editing, and saving files? First, using the mouse whenever reasonably possible, then again using keyboard shortcuts whenever reasonably possible. Let's see, for a real-life workflow, comparing the same application and platform, which is actually faster for a user who's experienced with the application they're using.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  125. Hilarious apk made you "eat your words" mmell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telling libelous lies about apk you had to admit were lies http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  126. mmell has to "eat his words" publicly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  127. mmell has to "eat his words" publicly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  128. mmell had to "eat his words" publicly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  129. mmell had to "eat his words" lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  130. No, mmell just has to "eat his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Yes folks - there's NOTHING quite like making a snivelling little libelous weasel like mmell GROVEL & EAT HIS WORDS, lol!... apk

  131. Power-Outage by DrYak · · Score: 1

    No, I think "Power outage" are these moments where the lights in all rooms suddenly go dark, and you grab the screen you were looking at and use it as a make-shift light source to find your way.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  132. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you're finished. If you're still working but want to save your progress, :w is what you want.

    Even if you're finished, :wq is more mnemonic.

  133. BS mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  134. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  135. GIT by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Nothing beats (1) timestamped backups or (2) manually versioning your file name (XXX1.doc,XXX2.doc,XXX3.doc) to preserve your thought evolution.

    Well, git beats it, on the ground that you local clone still has the same roll-back history, but without polluting everything with tons of silly name, specially after one version has gone through an e-mail trip.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  136. Temps by DrYak · · Score: 1

    LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org do exactly the same.

    And I'm sure that at least a few /.ers have taken git and applied it as form of "edit undo history" stored on non volatile support.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  137. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  138. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  139. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  140. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  141. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  142. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  143. mmell: How'd "eating your words" taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying I use hosts to evade police while I surf little boy porn http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (1 of 2)

    Libeling me saying my WARE IS A VIRUS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (2 of 2)

    THEN RECANTING THAT LIBEL HERE - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    ERRONEOUSLY saying I was creating a DNS replacment (which it's not, it shores up DNS redirect security issues & resolves FASTER locally in RAM vs. remote lookups) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Saying VI can do all my APK Hosts File Engine can do (not) & running -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... when VI can't?

    * Please... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have SERIOUS issues - get over your ''geek angst" already (you're not even much of a 'geek' based on your technical screwups above)... apk

  144. Zzzzz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another case of "I do not use it hence nobody in the world uses it". Several apps do not have the feature for auto save (design programs as example) so we need to use control-s often. But well you can find lots of examples of this kind like "I do not burn CDs hence nobody in the world uses it", "I do not print pages hence nobody in the world uses it", ""I do not use a fax hence nobody in the world uses it" and "I do not use Windows hence nobody in the world uses it"... Yes the last one is your wet dream, kiddos. ;)

  145. NOT saving is an active choice by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    What autosave seems to miss is that deliberately NOT saving something is an active choice at times. If I have a document - a graphics file say - and I want to just try a quick experiment but don't intend to permanently change the file, then that's my active choice. But autosave subverts that, making the 'experiment' far from quick, and a lot more long-winded. You have to duplicate the file or open a copy, or else undo or back out the change afterwards. It's much more work.

    An app we develop (Mac) provides a preference so that you can opt-out of the system's standard autosave and do it manually. It's proved to be an extremely popular feature.

  146. mmell, eating your words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  147. I can't imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...life without Ctrl-S. Every time I write a paper or anything else in a word processor, I hit ctrl-S out of habit virtually every time I finish a sentence, paragraph, or what have you. Multiple times. Just in case.

  148. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Mouse click in a dos box suspends output allowing you to srcoll up/down, hit enter to resume.You have to be quick if you're using the default buffer size.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  149. Git is not the only CM tool in town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Git is missing enough features that could make it the wrong tool for the job.

    Don't give me wrong, Git is an OK tool .... a hell of a lot better than CVS or SVN. But just like the two I mentioned, its missing a lot of features that enterprise project require.

    1. Re:Git is not the only CM tool in town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking out of your arse. It's used by thousands of programs, most if not all better than you, given that those "missing features" are not required. Perhaps you'd like a nice GUI to make it nice and easy for you?

  150. Re:mmell LIBEL classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth to tepples: He has every right to defend himself vs. sockpuppet downmods of his posts that way.

  151. No regrets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No longer do we have to have constant interruptions to worry about whether our changes are saved — but at the same time, we don't have that pause to take a moment and reflect on what we've written. I'm sure we've all had moments where our hands hover over a save/submit button before changing our minds and hammering the backspace key. Maybe now we'll have to think before we write."

    Naw, ship, I never fscking gave a ship about reflecting on what I'm fscking posting.

    Oh fsck a dfsck, I just realized, I shouldn't have clicked submit.

  152. IDE commits code changes automatically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I make typos while writing the code and that's checked in? and I correct the typo and that's checked in? and then I realize I don't even need to add that extra subroutine in my code, so I remove all that, and that's checked in? and then i add a comment somewhere and that's checked in? and then i change a word in the comment and that's checked in?

    WHAT!?

  153. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by skids · · Score: 1

    It stopped meaning that in browsers and many windowed applications when Windows hotkeys started to creep in because the linux desktop wanted to provide a shallow learning curve for transitioning users. On top of all the other bullshit they've done to mess up text entry in the URL bar for people who can actually type, not providing an easy switch to choose a bash/emacs keybinding style bugs the hell out of me. Not sure exactly what CTRL-K supposedly does but it sure doesn't cut the line off.

  154. Does Windows save the contents of Notepad? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Does the latest version of Windows save the contents of an unsaved running Notepad, so if the system were to crash, Notepad would open up with the "unsaved" contents on your next login? I know Mac OS X does that with TextEdit (similar to Notepad), and Windows XP never did it. Not sure about Windows 7 or 8.

  155. Instead by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Now it's Shelve / Commit.
    But even that might be history soon as I already have seen some auto-shelve plugins for my IDE.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  156. This article is drivel by Dasher42 · · Score: 2

    CTRL-S still suspends scrolling on my terminal now just like it did in 1997 on Slackware. What nonsensical software is the author using?

  157. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    :w or :wq writes the file even when nothing has been changed.
    ZZ or :x only writes when there was a change.
    It is better to get in the habit of using ZZ or :x only, so that file modification dates are not touched when no change was made.

    It is not really required to "just save your progress" as vi does that anyway. When it (or the system) crashes you
    can normally recover your file from the tempfile it creates. Writing the file is only required when you want to pick it up in
    some other program but not want to leave the editor.

  158. It confuses people, apparently by GNious · · Score: 1

    Wrote an online 3rd-party app for a game from CCP Games, where I explicitly designed it to automagically update the server when people entered data - there was no need for, or way to, save things.
    People helping out testing came back and asked, "How do we save things? Where is the save-button?"; apparently, the idea that things are saved continuously confused people.

    From that experience, I concluded 2 things:
    1) All apps should save progress automatically where possible (and sane)
    2) I should use Alpha/Beta testers, that whine less

  159. Data loss due to auto save is negative UX by tepples · · Score: 1

    Losing data due to autosave of an accidentally modified version hinders "them [from] hav[ing] that positive user experience." Full undo history since day one ameliorates this hindrance. Automatic backup and data location transparency would in theory "help[] them have that positive user experience", but I'm not yet fully convinced as to how willing most people are to suffer a recurring fee for storage on someone else's server, a recurring fee charged by the ISP for data transferred between a device and someone else's server during backup and restore, and user interface complexity in determining how each saved revision relates to others.

  160. Ctrl-S works differently in a Unix terminal by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Ctrl-S in an xterm suspends terminal input, and the characters you type aren't echoed back or acted on by the shell. Ctrl-Q resumes terminal input. So if you type Ctrl-S followed by "ls Directory", nothing happens and nothing appears in the terminal. But if you then type Ctrl-Q, the "buffered" command executes.

    This rather nifty featured unfortunately was broken by the Gnome developers. Ctrl-S does nothing inside the Gnome terminal emulator. This still works in a traditional Linux/Unix terminal, as well as xterm.

    1. Re:Ctrl-S works differently in a Unix terminal by tmjva · · Score: 1

      Still works on my dumb terminal window. Especially in the games on my sig line.

      --
      Tracy Johnson
      Old fashioned text games hosted below:
      http://empire.openmpe.com/
      BT
  161. Autosave is dangerous by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    It takes me a fraction of a second, and near zero thought, to save my work when I am pleased with it. All I want from autosave is a separate backup, to prevent automatic data loss (optionally with all the undo information). I don't want it autosaving half-edited files, especially not in code, nor halfway through a copy-paste in anything. When I hit save as, I don't want the file autosaved before also saving it with a different name.

    Sure, people get burned when the computer eats their unsaved data. But that only happens once per person. Now I even save rather large posts on the internet, if only in my copy/paste buffer, before posting them since on occasion the website or my internet connection chokes on my data. This would actually be a nice place for a browser input box autosave, since I don't usually want to bother saving these (or rather the "save" process is posting on the internet and is sometimes unreliable).

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  162. I must've really hit a nerve. by mmell · · Score: 1
    "Eating my words"? Tell me, when the bullies cornered you in school, what did they make you eat?

    Must've been even worse after you left school. The workplace was going to be better - only it wasn't. Sure, the bullies couldn't pin you into a corner and pull your underwear up over your head anymore, but now it was even worse. Your coworkers and even your bosses were all friends, all members of the same "in" club which never let you in back in school. You're still smarter than all of them; they couldn't even begin to understand most of your ideas - so instead, they just refused to listen. No matter how superior your ideas were, your bosses kept saying things like "not best practices" and "industry standards" and things like that. They couldn't even begin to understand how superior your knowledge of computers was, so they conspired to lock you out. Your coworkers always seemed to get credit for your best ideas, leaving you the blame for anything which they couldn't make work. The bosses wouldn't listen; they are part of the conspiracy to keep you down, keep you from ever rising to the heights you deserve. Your Mom couldn't even help you anymore. You're alone. Still helpless, still being bullied by people who don't even understand a tenth of what you know about computers. You try at great length to get them to understand how superior your ideas are only to be told your ideas aren't "scalable" or "manageable". When you demonstrated for your employers how superior your ideas really are, they couldn't understand and found excuses like "due diligence" and "reliability". They used "best practices" as an excuse to not bother to understand your genius, your brilliance.

    That's when it happened, isn't it? That's when you started work on your magnum opus, on the software that would make them all shut up. Only it didn't work that way, did it? They laughed at you, perhaps they even threatened to fire you if you didn't start working "with the team", a euphemism for pretending to be as stupid as they were. It was the schoolyard all over again, but no Mommy or Teacher in sight. This wasn't better, it was worse as you realized that all you could do was bite your tongue and take it, just like you had to take all the humiliation from the bullies on the schoolyard.

    Based on the extreme vehemence of your response, I'm even more certain that I've correctly described the worthless ends of your life in every detail. So now I'm curious - do you spend your nights lying awake dreaming of revenge all the time, of getting back at everyone that hurt you, getting back at the Daddy who just couldn't respect a gutless worm like you; or perhaps Daddy was doing more and now you're just too old to be any good even for that? Even the Police and the Courts wouldn't help you. They keep telling you there's nothing you can do, but you know it's just the same old bullies from school still trying to keep you from being recognized for your superior intellect. You couldn't sue anybody; the lawyers keep telling you that they won't take this on contingency, that you don't have a chance of winning in a court of law. Mommy loves you but she can't afford to buy a lawyer to chase a lost cause. Now you're truly alone; even your Mommy doesn't understand or believe you. So now you live in your New York flat; your neighbors avoid you. They say you're strange, that there's something off about you. They can all sense that you're different, and they're all scared of you for it. Well, not scared. Hostile. That's the word. Even here where you're not showing everyone up in class, they still don't like you. Nobody'll be your friend, there's nobody left you can turn to. Mommy won't even hold you like she used to. Daddy never did respect you anyway; but now he doesn't even want to be around you (probably a good thing for you). There aren't even teachers left to turn to. Nobody at work (assuming you can hold a job) will be your friend or even give you a chance. So you end up here. Tell me, do you masturbate while reading your spampo

  163. Did you say this? Yes, you did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made the mistake of labelling his hostfile manager 'malware' by mmell (832646) on Sunday May 11, 2014 @12:53AM (#46970629) from http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    That's "eating your words" of libel, for sure, no denying it as it's right there in black & white.

    1. Re:Did you say this? Yes, you did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk "hitting a nerve": mmell writes a book only to get shotdown by his own words quoted (eating them) and a single sentence pointing that obvious fact out (obvious to anyone not deluded libeling like mmell that is).

  164. Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my error by mmell · · Score: 1
    You wouldn't understand that, though. Mommy told you it was always the bully's fault, didn't she.

    Eating my words. Done long ago (as you've so conveniently pointed out). So tell me - when will you man up? Or did all the abuse you've suffered over the years render you incapable of even that much maturity?

    I'm going to leave off of you for awhile. You've obviously suffered enough; and I'm not entirely sure your problems are all functional. I'm beginning to suspect an organic component, and I've just realized that I don't want to be the stressor that sends you off on a psychotic rampage in the real world (the tantrums you've thrown here are ample evidence that your mental stability is precarious at best).

    Please - seek out professional help. You desperately need it.

  165. Re:Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We call it "eating your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  166. Re:Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "we". You're not fooling anybody by cheerleading yourself. Nobody has EVER taken your side. And nobody ever will.

  167. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wq! even

  168. What's wrong - run out of sockpuppet mod points? by mmell · · Score: 1
    I've noticed that you're falling off in your systematic downmodding of all my comments -a downmodding too uniform to be of random origin. Please, don't bother denying it. Your clearly established pattern of deception and misdirection won't serve you here. This is a simple discussion between me and thou, here and now.

    I've never used sockpuppets, etc. - despite your accusations to the contrary. However, your use of them is plainly known and understood. That's why you can't respond as a logged-in user - you can't risk losing or exposing your sockpuppets, isn't that right? They're your only "friends" in the world. Imaginary lovers, no doubt.

    I don't suppose you understand the difference between admitting a mistake and "eating your words". Understandable in a person suffering from arrested development. I'd say you stopped emotionally maturing at about the age of thirteen. Please (please) - you don't need to tell anyone here, you don't need to tell anyone anywhere - but go find competent health care. Specifically, psychological or psychiatric care. Let's face it - many of our greatest authors, artists, composers, dreamers, doers, great thinkers - many of them have suffered from 'demons', from emotional or mental illness. I am truly sorry that I exposed what I am sure is a fairly accurate portrait of your life here on Slashdot. I really believe that with just a little help, just a little, you can have a vastly more satisfying and productive life.

    Look, something as minimal as an employee assistance program can give you a lot of tools to improve your life. Honestly. They'll never tell anyone about what you share with them (unless you're a conspiracy theorist who sees NSA cabals in every corner). I'll never know. Nobody here will ever know. Your co-workers, your friends - none of them will ever know. You will be happier; you'll have an easier time maintaining friendships, forming relationships. Please - just go ask someone. A doctor, a priest, a friend. Anyone. It's no shame, but if you are ashamed it'll still be absolutely confidential. Please get some help.

    Mike Mell.

    A postscript: I truly do regret hurting you the way I did. I now recognize that your behavior is not mean or hateful, but rather the product of personal conditions which we as a society recognize and can help with. A programmer of your skill and abilities should not be marginalized for things which can be treated, corrected, fixed. Your code may or may not be genius; but until you can demonstrate emotional maturity only an imbecile will run it. Look, it doesn't even mean anything was truly wrong with you; but there are people out there totally prepared to do whatever is necessary to help you, to make you even more effective and capable. I'm not even asking you to commit to a course of action. All I'm asking is that you look into it? M

  169. Re:Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my er by mmell · · Score: 1
    Thanks. As you can see above, I've been rather slow myself in recognizing what I should've seen far earlier on. I didn't merely bait a troll; I actively worked to mentally beat up a man who needs help, not harm. I don't know if APK will ever regret his mistakes; I shall, and for a long time. I haven't made this bad a mistake in quite some long time. I didn't merely talk about APK's bullies, I was all too happy to become one.

    Habits. A lifetime of mistakes, repeated once more. I didn't do good. I have chosen never to be an agent of evil, yet here I have bent my intellect on the intentional harm of a human being. I only hope that I may be able to redeem this through honesty and honest concern.

    'Scuse me - I have to go dine on ashes now.

  170. What - how will flow control work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and what will happen to Ctrl-Q, then?

  171. That's nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vim autosaves your stuff on a .swp file since 91 (possibly other editors have done something similar even earlier than that). I think that people who are not used to editors and software which auto-saves your work may overlap with people who needed to get up to change the TV channel.

  172. Re:Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs the support of a million trolling liars when he has truth http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ?

  173. Re:What's wrong - run out of sockpuppet mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed you had to "eat your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ?

  174. Re:Hmmm . . . I'd call it honestly admitting my er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've been even slower to recognize you had to "eat your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  175. Poor, sad APK simply cannot understand. by mmell · · Score: 1
    There's a difference between owning up to mistakes and "eating ones words" as you so ineloquently put it.

    Please get professional help.

    M

    1. Re:Poor, sad APK simply cannot understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like saying others are pedophiles? Where'd you own up to that one?

    2. Re:Poor, sad APK simply cannot understand. by mmell · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I simply assumed since you obviously were molested or abused as a child that you'd grown up to do the same. My mistake.

  176. Actually, no. by mmell · · Score: 1
    You don't seem to know the difference between "eating my own words" and honest admission of an error. I shouldn't have abused the mentally unbalanced.

    I urge you once more to seek professional mental health care. Until you do, your software is unusable. You will not have respect. You need to learn appropriate public behavior, and I perceive clearly that will not happen until you have received therapeutic help.

    M

    1. Re:Actually, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like saying others are pedophiles? Where'd you own up to that one??

    2. Re:Actually, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder how Wikipedia made APK leave them alone, doesn't it? APK has never been embraced here, his copypasta trolling spam has been endemic for over a decade.

      A quick view of the page history of the Wikipedia hosts file article shows he was shut down hard in 2011 and basically gave up. I would have expected him to be using botnets to continually repost his spam on the hosts article at Wikipedia. Somehow, he was convinced to move on and troll elsewhere on the internet.

      Wonder if that success could be replicated here?

    3. Re:Actually, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how do nothings like you live with yourselves. APK creates good tools. You don't.

    4. Re:Actually, no. by mmell · · Score: 1

      Same as the rest. Y'know, when you get some help you'll learn how all this really works.

    5. Re:Actually, no. by mmell · · Score: 1
      I work writing software and administering systems for large enterprises. You, on the other hand, are relegated to writing little tools which you can't even get hosted on US servers.

      Can't give you a list - NDA's and all. Look, just get some help; even if you don't have insurance, the Affordable Healthcare Act will see to it that you can get some assistance. Please see a mental health care professional. For your own good. Please.

  177. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably true, but what's the problem with using less? It has a ton of useful features, and many useless ones as well.

  178. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    Still works for me (cmd.exe window in MS Windows).
    --
    MY FACE MY FACE oh god no NO NOOOO NT stop the angles are not real ZALG IS TO THE PONY HE COMES

  179. That's not a desirable end. by mmell · · Score: 1

    Alexander needs our support and help, not to be banned. He can't help himself; but perhaps if we show him some kindness and courtesy he can ultimately get the help he needs.

  180. I did all that while YOU were in diapers boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did that, & did INCREDIBLY WELL @ it: Have you? Let's compare:

    Windows NT Magazine (now Windows IT Pro) April 1997 "BACK OFFICE PERFORMANCE" issue, page 61

    (&, for work done for EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com on PAID CONTRACT (writing portions of their SuperCache program increasing its performance by up to 40% via my work) albeit, for their SuperDisk & HOW TO APPLY IT, took them to a finalist position @ MS Tech Ed, two years in a row 2000-2002, in its HARDEST CATEGORY: SQLServer Performance Enhancement).

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE, 1997, "Top Freeware & Shareware of the Year" issue page 210, #1/first entry in fact (my work is there)

    PC-WELT FEB 1998 - page 84, again, my work is featured there

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE, WINTER 1998 - page 92, insert section, MUST HAVE WARES, my work is again, there

    PC-WELT FEB 1999 - page 83, again, my work is featured there

    CHIP Magazine 7/99 - page 100, my work is there

    GERMAN PC BOOK, Data Becker publisher "PC Aufrusten und Repairen" 2000, where my work is contained in it

    HOT SHAREWARE Numero 46 issue, pg. 54 (PC ware mag from Spain), 2001 my work is there, first one featured, yet again!

    Also, a British PC Mag in 2002 for many utilities I wrote, saw it @ BORDERS BOOKS but didn't buy it... by that point, I had moved onto other areas in this field besides coding only...

    Being paid for an article that made me money over @ PCPitstop in 2008 for writing up a guide that has people showing NO VIRUSES/SPYWARES & other screwups, via following its point, such as THRONKA sees here -> http://www.xtremepccentral.com...

    It's also been myself helping out the folks at the UltraDefrag64 project (a 64-bit defragger for Windows), in showing them code for how to do Process Priority Control @ the GUI usermode/ring 3/rpl 3 level in their program (good one too), & being credited for it by their lead dev & his team... see here -> http://ultradefrag.sourceforge... or here http://sourceforge.net/tracker...

    Which ended up fixing a "bug" for them later, here -> http://sourceforge.net/p/ultra... via its implementation (partially, NOT fully yet as I outline it & use in my applications such as this one -> http://www.start64.com/index.p...

    ----

    What do I have to say about that much above? I can't say it any better, than this was stated already (from the greatest book of all time, the "tech manual for life" imo):

    "But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me." - Corinthians Chapter 15, Verse 10

    (And, because I got LUCKY to have been exposed to some really GREAT classmates, professors, & colleagues on the job over time as well)

    ---

    * That's only a SMALL PARTIAL LIST of my favorites over time... how about you?

    APK

    P.S.=> You've got a HABIT of shooting your mouth off, being unable to back up your b.s. with your mouth writing checks your ass can't cash, & then "eating your words" in the end too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:I did all that while YOU were in diapers boy by mmell · · Score: 1
      And yet google brings all the worst right to the top when I search for your name. Why is that?

      Listen, Alex - everyone here is aware of your abuses. I suppose in your mind that represents a reason to never admit to them - or perhaps your upbringing has left you so damaged that you can't even understand what's happening here. Either way, you need help. Serious help. It's not your fault - but as an adult, sooner or later you will have to take responsibility for your mistakes. You can't continue blaming your parents, or your childhood. I know your upbringing was traumatic, but you have an opportunity here to do something about it. Please talk to a doctor, a psychologist, a therapist, someone. Your life is a hell, but there is a way out. Your quoting of the Christian Bible implies that you have access to a priest somewhere - if you won't seek out a mental health professional, please see a priest. Someone. Anyone. Please.

      M.

  181. Awww, "poo' lil' mmell" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmell gets "FruStRaTed" @ being shown up by apk and tosses names & libel then ends up "eating his words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:Awww, "poo' lil' mmell" by mmell · · Score: 1
      I already know I've hit on the truth. Your vehement, even maniacal response has shown that.

      You need help. You must have at least one friend somewhere who can point you in the right direction?

  182. Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't BE 'banned': Get THAT thru your microcephalic skull, & go finish "eating your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p... boy!

    1. Re:Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash by mmell · · Score: 1
      Nor did I suggest that you should be 'banned'. Please, please - you're only hurting yourself. Get help. Soon.

      M.

  183. Same old mmell: Resorting to the illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ad hominem attacks & libel etc.: You're no man. You're a frustrated LITTLE boy http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:Same old mmell: Resorting to the illogical by mmell · · Score: 1

      Yet of the two of us, I seem to be the only one capable of civilized behavior. Fascinating.

    2. Re:Same old mmell: Resorting to the illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libel http://slashdot.org/comments.p... != civilized behavour.

    3. Re:Same old mmell: Resorting to the illogical by mmell · · Score: 1
      If I have libeled you, you should seek redress in the courts.

      If this is the only form of gratification you have, doesn't that suggest to you that perhaps there is something wrong with you? Nobody (and I really mean nobody here supports you. You must wonder why that's so? Get help. From your previous quoting of Corinthians, you're presumably Christian (and I'll admit you're living up to all of my expectations of Christians here). Surely there must be a priest or nun you can turn to for help?

  184. "Can't give you a list" = lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical bullshit lies from a bullshit artist named mmell that had to "eat his words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  185. OH, really? Then why'd you FUCKUP like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I work writing software and administering systems for large enterprises" - by mmell (832646) on Sunday May 25, 2014 @11:46AM (#47087437)

    LMAO - bullshit? Why?? First of all - My program's NOT a replacement for DNS as YOU SAID, stupid:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    (It actually works WITH DNS, shoring up its redirect security weaknesses, AND, eliminating problems when DNS goes belly up!)

    (Damn, you are TOO EASY to catch in bullshit & lies - every single time... just way too easy!)

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "You, on the other hand, are relegated to writing little tools which you can't even get hosted on US servers. Can't give you a list - NDA's and all." - by mmell (832646) on Sunday May 25, 2014 @11:46AM (#47087437)

    Bwahahaha: Bullshit! Primarily those WERE my jobs for decades in the art & science of computing, writing MIS systems for companies in the Fortune 100-500 still running to this very day... bulletproof & bug free!

    NOW - What I did in "side ventures" in freeware or shareware did well too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    (Some even ending up as commercially sold code to this very day by certified MS partners, that did INCREDIBLY WELL @ Ms TechEd 2000-2002 no less as a FINALIST in its hardest category: SQLServer Performance Enhancement - so, how about YOU? )

    Secondly - ANY 2 bit Network Admin WOULD know that, as well as a 1/2 decent software dev, so... WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL? Yourself?? apk

  186. Hey Alex - calm down. by mmell · · Score: 1
    It's plain you simply lack social skills. Your continued demonstration of mental instability is strong evidence of both that lack and its source. I'm sorry that you have endured such a life, and I would very much like to see you get help.

    If insults and aggressive discourse are the only tools which you understand socially, I suppose we must blame your parents. It's not your fault, and while becoming an adult should make you responsible for your own actions, obviously this is not so.

    Please seek psychiatric help at your earliest opportunity.

    M.

  187. So sad. by mmell · · Score: 1

    You're still just a poor, abused child. Please get help soon - from a therapist, a priest, someone - or were you abused by priests too?

  188. It's plain you lack computing skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Period...

    (Everything you said indicates you're VERY POOR in skills, all shown in the link above...)

    Your BIGGEST SINGLE PROBLEM = Your mouth writes checks your ass can't cash...

    By the way: Are you a licensed psychiatric professional who has a formal examination of my "alleged mental state" according to YOU, "Dr. Quack - the 'SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.'" (minus degrees in said psychiatric sciences as well)?

    No??

    Hate to tell you this, but... that's more libel from you, yet again... you're a fool.

    APK

    P.S.=> You "talk a good game" (yea, right - not even, see link above) & then when you're caught with your pants down, you begin your libelous illogical ad hominem attacks & then end up "eating your words" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ... piriful!

    ... apk

  189. Your behavior here is textbook behavior. by mmell · · Score: 1
    I believe it's called 'mania' - and I detect very strong traces of paranoia as well. Not quite rising to the level of psychosis (schizophrenia), but certainly very unhealthy. There are people who can help you, Alex. Not trying to fool anyone here - trying to convince you to get some much needed help.

    On the upside - at least you're vaguely varying the content of your posts. Perhaps you will eventually see the simple truth, that you need professional help.

    M.

  190. You've got nothing by comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how the rest of searches on MY NAME turns up tons of good things I've done ontop of actually being what you merely CLAIM (lies obviously judging by your poor tech skills already proven poor http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ) with some you won't find searching my name, but other wares I've done over time or was part of), eh?

    By comparison?

    You've got ZERO, because you are a trolling libeling zero!

    Those "top ones"? Come on - you're a programmer (not) so you claim:

    The results of "SEO" games from fools I've snuffed before had to *try* to resort to libeling me & after failing to take me on validly technically, nothing more - lol, worms!

    (In fact? Hey - THEY ARE, just like you here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which is all scumbags like you, online or elsewhere, are capable of when CRUSHED in our shared field of computing... LIES, & Libel - how weak!)

    It's plain by your EVASIONS that I've achieved THINGS THE LIKES OF WHICH YOU OBVIOUSLY CANNOT EVER ACHIEVE http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Done while you were in diapers probably (all while I was actually DOING what you merely 'claim' with NDA's etc. (bullshit) you do & on the side ontop of a day job coding or network administrating etc.)

    APK

    P.S.=> By the way, lastly - How'd "eating your words" taste?? http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Yes - as usual You brought that on yourself too, just like your tech screwups & false accusations in the 1st link above also... you're truly pitiful!

    LMAO - All you have is LIBEL & LIES acting like a frustrated little petulant child when shown up by your betters in myself - period...

    It's become apparent to me you're a weasel whose block I knocked off with facts vs your TOTAL bullshit, & you're not even worth my time (I will bookmarks this though, just in case you try to "play smart" again, just to expose you with it...)

    ... apk

  191. You didn't answer the question put to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QUESTION: Are you a licensed degreed psychiatric professional with a formal diagnosis of MYalleged mental state, according to YOU "Dr. Quack - the 'SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.'"?

    No??

    * That's MORE libel from you if you don't possess those items to your name/credit, moron!

    You're obviously insane: You don't consider the consequences of your actions or words, & that is a possible definition of insanity (& that's obvious by your feely libeling me continually, aggravated libel no less)... & for that I don't need a PhD in psyciatric sciences to KNOW you fit that definition.

    Swallow your pride fool - I ate you alive techinically so BADLY that you're being reduced to childish lunacy like you're doing now? Please... lol, GROW UP!

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a FOOL - TOTALLY technically inept despite your claims of being a coder & network administrator professionally -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & "eating your words" too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ... apk

  192. autosave feature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Heck, even the games I play have an autosave feature." And it is the most heated "feature" ever.

  193. rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ctr-s is dead! Long live ctr-q!

  194. Answer this question (quit evading it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guilt by evasion on your part otherwise: QUESTION -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so we can shed a little light on your utter LACK of credibility on yet another front!

    More aggravated libel from you results in YOU calling me a pedophile too, ontop of a malware maker which THAT latter accusation you HAD TO WITHDRAW since you KNEW IT'S LIBELING ME Result? This: YOU - "EATING YOUR WORDS" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    Just as I said - as well as now essentially claiming that I suffer from various forms of insanity etc. - et al... which I do not!

    So I ask this question in the 1st link @ the top of my reply to you above!

    ( & I suspect you're NO licensed practicing professional psychiatric pro, + you have never diagnosed me in a professional psychiatric environs either)

    See - without those items to your name/credit along with your accusations & other disparaging comments you made about me?

    You are LIBELING me yet again!

    (That makes YOU, very stupid!).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're also TOTALLY technically inept (so I seriously doubt your claim of being a coder & network admin, I AM ONE & have been for decades professionally, I can recognize liars like you a MILE out) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as well as a libeler that had to "eat his words" - Since after all - Your big mouth that wrote checks you can't ca$h brought it on you, bringing it ALL on yourself in my exposing you for what you TRULY are: A serious liar, libeler, & loser online - lol!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Answer this question (quit evading it) by mmell · · Score: 1
      You use the word libel so freely. If that is so, you will only gain redress in a court of law. You will not have it here.

      You need to seek mental health care immediately. I'm afraid my prior analyses of your background was too accurate, and I have likely done you irreparable harm. Please seek appropriate mental health care immediately.

      Since we both seem to have over two decades of experience in the IT field, I will ask (no doubt in vain) for you to rein in your vitriol. You appear to have lost the capacity for rational thought. I'm truly sorry for my contribution to your current mental condition, and I regret my contribution to your continuing mental instability.

      M.

  195. Like I thought: You've done ZERO, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact: You had to run - You can't even BEGIN to scratch this partial only list of MY favorites I've done http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    You = "big talker" but NO ACTION or results of any decent note...

    * Yet YOU claim to be a network engineer/admin + coder too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ?

    BULLSHIT - or you wouldn't have FUCKED UP LARGE so many times technically as you did vs. myself, ALL cited here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... the FIRST TIME I ever heard from "the trolling done ZERO 'ne'er-do-well' likes of YOU...", ugh.. disgusting!

    APK

    P.S.=> You're pitiful... apk

  196. Statute of Limitations on Libel = 1-3 yrs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typically, & NOW you're evading this question too? Yes http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * You are completely pitiful & remember: You have 1 yr. to wonder what I'll do, one way, or another (legally).

    APK

    P.S.=> Tell us how you're a network admin & programmer (lol, NOT), after this utter SCREWUP of yours -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & tell us how you can mock my wares, when YOU HAVEN'T DONE SHIT boy in comparison to myself from only a PARTIAL LIST I can produce -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    1. Re:Statute of Limitations on Libel = 1-3 yrs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have 1 yr. to wonder what I'll do, one way, or another (legally).

      Nobody will ever wonder about that, because everybody reading this thread knows the answer.

      The answer is nothing.

      You will continue to screech about "libel", but you will do nothing, because as stupid as you are, you know that nothing that anyone has ever posted about you would meet a definition of libel that even the most unethical ambulance-chasing lawyer would ever support in court. You know that you'd be laughed out of the office of any lawyer you ever consulted about it.

      You will do nothing.

  197. Re:Bah, we already said goodbye to CTRL-S years ag by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Still works. Used it just last week. Now if you know what Esc-e means in the context of a very popular modem, I'd be impressed.

  198. Your reaction shows otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly - I'd like to know WHAT gave you the idea to say something this stupid -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... about a program you clearly have NO IDEA/CLUE about in the 1st place.

    Oh, your stupid statement of "no US server would host your ware" (etc.)? Plenty have, or do still. I don't CARE where the server is, as long as it works & is reliable.

    Heck - the SECURITY COMMUNITY ITSELF hosts my ware HpHosts/MalwareBytes -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... recommending it as "the BEST OF ITS KIND", no less... so much for your libel you "ate your words on" you withdrew, eh?

    APK

    P.S.=> By the way: Start64.com where my ware's featured IS 1 of only 2 I know of that do that, & they in PARTICULAR specific not only "64-bit compatible" (like another one out there that does allow that, in other words, 32-bit apps are allowed there that run on 64-bit OS etc.), this one TENDS TO SPECIFY the app has to have a TRUE 64-bit version OR port of it (why I use them only, exclusively - they're 1 of a kind afaik, & the future)... apk

    1. Re:Your reaction shows otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, your stupid statement of "no US server would host your ware" (etc.)

      I made no such statement. You seem to have confused me with someone else. This is not surprising, as you obviously get confused easily.

      I have never made a remark about your little hostfile script. I don't give a damn about it one way or the other.

      I am simply noting that you will never take any sort of legal action against the poster you're currently obsessing over, just as you have never taken any against any of the other people you've obsessed over in the past. And when you inevitably transfer your fixation to the next person you get mad at for making fun of you on the Internet, you'll never do anything against them either.

      You'll do nothing, because there's nothing you can do.

      And we all know it.

  199. Addendum: SPECIFICALLY THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What on EARTH made you speak this falsehood about my program http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... which you clearly know NOTHING about?

    APK

    P.S.=> This, I have to hear... apk

  200. mmell: What on EARTH made you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak this falsehood from you about my program (which you clearly knew zero on) http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... ?

    * CLUE: I never intended it to be a DNS replacement, nor is it one...

    (As you stupidity stated in the link above, hence my asking that question above...)

    Again:

    IF anything, it works WITH DNS, shoring up its redirection security issues OR being 'downed' issues also for end user consumers of DNS services (it also lightens loads on DNS too, bonus for admins of them I suppose...).

    On the libel of myself, my wares (calling me a pedo, saying my ware = a malware, etc.) & me NOT being able to do anything about it? LOL, yea - ok. Wait & see, like I said.

    APK

    P.S.=> The answer to that question above though @ the outset of my reply here? THAT, I have to hear... apk

    1. Re:mmell: What on EARTH made you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not mmell. Addressing me as if I were only makes you look even more stupid and insane.

      And you'll do nothing. You're doing it right now.

      You said wait and see? No waiting is necessary. We've already seen you do everything you'll ever be capable of doing.

      Nobody has ever suffered any negative consequence from anything they've ever said about you. Nobody ever will.

    2. Re:mmell: What on EARTH made you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:mmell: What on EARTH made you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You replied to my post with nothing but a link to the post that I was replying to.

      That is literally the most useless thing you could have done. A completely blank response would have been more substantial, because it would at least have been forthright about the fact that you had no response worth making.

      But it's appropriate, in a way. It's nothing, which is exactly what you are doing about the so-called "libel" you keep whining about.

      You will continue to do nothing.

    4. Re:mmell: What on EARTH made you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect? It's apk's wont... he never has anything constructive to add to a discussion. He is nothing but a troll. Apparently mmell, who is neither you nor I, believes he has a mental disorder and is trying to white knight for apk now.

      I think apk is just an aspie troll who is intelligent enough to figure out how to interact socially in a forum, but yet he chooses not to do so. I further anticipate he is intelligent enough to realize that acting the way he does will scare away anyone sane from giving him admin rights on their box (which is what his software obviously requires).

      FFS, apk, you would be considered less of a troll if you stopped post-stalking people and solely posting about your hosts software. Literally 100% of apk's posts are either stalking another user or are copypasta shills for his software. Free advice: talk about something else when relevant. You don't even need an account. You can even be an AC curmudgeon like Ethanol Fueled. People don't consider him a troll because he posts about more than one topic (and he doesnt stalk users). His posts may be offensive (or not, depending on who you are), but the TOPICS VARY. Try that. Hell, if that's too much to ask, try trolling about different topics. Climate change is a good topic, always ripe for trolling.

      The sad thing is that if APK can find a way to be too autistic for Slashdot, then sweet jesus, that's fucking bad. I mean, this community is formed by the geeks, nerds, and social pariahs. If you get ostracized here, then the problem is *you*, not everybody else. We aren't a bunch of fucking jocks mocking people who are smarter than us, but we do get sick of the one-note song and stalkers.

      So... I'm expecting copypasta in response, and definitely expecting another cliched reference to his hosts software. I tried, though. Seriously, apk, I'm not mmell... he seems to be trying to be your friend. I just want peace from your monotone trolling and user stalking.

  201. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    software save YOU

  202. Old habits die hard by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    I Ctrl-S every time I make a substantial change to what I'm working on and I don't plan to stop. You can throw whatever kind of autosave feature you want in, but I'm not going to stop saving manually. I've seen too many people get burned by not saving and relying on autosave or not understanding what autosave is and what its limitations are.

    The biggest problem I have with Ctrl-S is if I open an existing script with the intent of modifying it and forget to rename it before hitting Ctrl-S. That sucks.

  203. applause by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    n/t

  204. am ocd by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    jokes need to make sense to be funny, i find, but i do realise most others find otherwise.