Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Charges $750 For One Minute of International Data Roaming

reifman (786887) writes 'Last week, AT&T shut down my data service after I turned roaming on in Canada for one minute to check Google maps. I wasn't able to connect successfully but they reported my phone burned through 50 MB and that I owed more than $750. Google maps generally require 1.3 MB per cell. They adamantly refused to reactivate my U.S. data service unless I 'agreed' to purchase an international data roaming package to cover the usage. They eventually reversed the charges but it seems that the company's billing system had bundled my U.S. data usage prior to the border crossing with the one minute of international data roaming.'

218 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Even better bundle by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    They now bundle "location services" for your AT&T credit card so that instead of somebody robbing you for your wallet, they now have to rob both your cell phone and your wallet, meaning you'll lose even more when you get robbed.

    It's a feature, not a bug.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Even better bundle by koan · · Score: 2

      Yeah I like how ATT sells it as a favour to the customer when it's really about being able to charge more for your information when they sell it to 3rd parties.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Even better bundle by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Dunno what AT&T's policy is on fraudulent charges, but most banks give you zero liability. The law requires $50 maximum liability, so dropping it to zero isn't that big of a deal, so most do that as an incentive to always carry their card around.

      I actually have this:

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ...

      I love it, to be honest. Technically yeah, if somebody robs my phone they also rob my wallet, but they're probably going to also do that anyways if I'm getting mugged. But the upshot of this is that this wallet is terrible for carrying cash, so I habitually never do. If my "wallet" were to get stolen, I'd basically only be out my phone, my insurance card, my driver's license, and this $15 piece of vinyl. My credit card costs nothing to get replaced, whereas my driver's license costs $5. I've always hated carrying around cash anyways.

      Never having money when bums hassle you, yet you can still buy stuff anyways, is nice. Being able to "call" your wallet when you've misplaced it is nice. Having only this and my keys in my pocket is also nice.

      As for TFA, switch to tmobile; their international roaming plan is free.

  2. 50MB = 750$ by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF? Not that a 50GB warrants a bill like that either.. this reminds me of the bad old days where you never knew if you went over your allocated time/minutes/etc until you got a bill, highly inflated for what it is.

    This practice should be outlawed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:50MB = 750$ by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Canada had the same thing going on with some absolutely absurd roaming charges. They recently changed the laws to limit how much you can be billed (can't comment to how effective that change was as I've had no cause to find out).

    2. Re:50MB = 750$ by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why I like T-Mobile. While coverage is (and likely will always be) quite limited for 4G, I've never seen them cross the line from "typical big company evil" to the black depths of "phone company evil". Plus, they have decent pre-paid plans, which lets you strictly limit surprises.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:50MB = 750$ by WarJolt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reminds me of running instances on AWS. AT&T has no financial incentive to reduce these surprise charges. Seriously there should be a hard cap that we can set. Sure we are responsible for these charge, but most of the times naive consumers are not aware. Amazon clearly posts the prices of their instances, but it's not uncommon to get a $30,000 bill accidentally due to some developer testing out their application by spinning off instances. You get charged for the whole hour when an instance starts on AWS and things can show up on their accounting system weeks later.

      A real time system for monitoring usage should be mandated by law and sufficient warning should be available. A data roaming plan should automatically be applied if it will save you money. Most importantly we should have the ability to set a cap.

    4. Re:50MB = 750$ by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Adam Savage ran into this before.

      Either AT&T is incompetent, or (quite possibly) the Canadian carriers are gouging.

      This is hardly the first time we've heard of this happening. And I doubt it will be the last.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:50MB = 750$ by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Seems like he used the "No plan" rate for that first session as we discussed earlier you're supposed to tell AT&T somehow you're in another zone!

    6. Re: 50MB = 750$ by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Also, free data roaming (internationally ) at 2g speeds.

      It was enough for me to use the maps and even yelp in a pinch.

      Plus, all my email would sync in the background.

      They also give 2.5 GB of tethering with the unlimited data plan ( which I frequently break into the 5-10 GB range in a month ).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re: 50MB = 750$ by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced the phone didn't sync 50MB in one minute if data had been off for a while.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:50MB = 750$ by alen · · Score: 1

      on the website or via a smartphone app you can add international data to your account. it's like $30 for 100MB
      you can pro rate it, start it from the date you change, and cancel the next month if you want. point is just add it before you go and no surprises

    9. Re: 50MB = 750$ by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Even still ... there is no sensible way that 50MB of data is worth $11K.

      That's simply obscene.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:50MB = 750$ by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

      I use AWS and I find the usage reports are pretty much up to the minute at any given time. So I think saying 'wow we didn't notice for weeks' is a bit of a stretch.

    11. Re:50MB = 750$ by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

      T-Mobile "not evil"??? They gouged me $150 for 1.5MB data roaming from Bosnia (I'm from Poland), and would take more had I used a contract rather than a prepaid plan. And unlike the guy in TFA, I did not get them to reverse the charges.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    12. Re: 50MB = 750$ by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      LOL, or $750 ... something like that ... need more coffee apparently.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re: 50MB = 750$ by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

      God ... the courier font ... it burns

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:50MB = 750$ by lgw · · Score: 2

      But were the charges legitimate (not in error)?

      The bar for "normal big company evil" is pretty low - one might argue it's resting on the ground. But phone companies own lots of trenching equipment and can still fail to clear a bar resting on the ground. And disrupt access to the bar for 6 weeks, while accidentally charging you $700 for it. I have no proof that the CEO of AT&T can't have an orgasm unless he strangles a puppy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re: 50MB = 750$ by Striikerr · · Score: 2

      Yep.. T-Mobile is awesome in the USA. The tethering works great. No ridiculous prices to add SMS. Free international roaming (slower speeds but I'll take it! Also can buy data at a faster speed). I was on AT&T's plan for years. I had a grandfathered unlimited data pan with them. Once they sent me a notice for exceeding normal use (wasn't that much to be honest, I think the phone hit 3 Gigs of data due to our son watching some Netflix videos) and slowed my connection down (actually it was my wife's phone) we decided to leave AT&T for T-Mobile and are so glad we did. I tell everyone I know that they should leave AT&T and use T-Mobile..

    16. Re:50MB = 750$ by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      It is to be outlawed, as long as you live in the EU. In the US, no such luck. Instead, you have a "stupid tax", for people too fucking stupid to install a foreign sim card in their AT&T sim card friendly phones.

      This isn't that complicated and AT&T is shit, but it's not that hard (and a whole lot cheaper and more convenient) to get a sim in a foreign country and basically treat it the same as your home wireless service - just with substantially better reception.

      Having to "turn on" data temporarily in a foreign country is the first sign of a mistake.

    17. Re:50MB = 750$ by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I think this is because US T-mobile and Deusche Telekom T Mobile aren't really the same company anymore aside from the matching Logos and GSM frequencies.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    18. Re: 50MB = 750$ by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Joke's on you... now that everyone you know listened to your advice and switched to TMO, they're going to be bought out by Sprint, and all your friends will curse you and refuse to listen to your advice any more.

    19. Re:50MB = 750$ by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, T-Mobile in the USA is not the same company as whatever has that name in Europe. The US company is only partially owned by Deutsche Telekom in fact.

    20. Re:50MB = 750$ by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Either AT&T is incompetent, or (quite possibly) the Canadian carriers are gouging.

      FYI - carriers don't make money on regular subscriptions. Instead, ROAMING charges fuel the profits. And they're HUGE profits - think $/minute for a phone call, 5 cents per kB (not kiB) not including headers, etc. (At 5c/kB, that's $50/MB)

      In fact, if you ever wondered why Telus and Bell (Canadian carriers, who normally did CDMA) installed 3G HSPA equipment 5 years ago... it's because Bell was a huge Olympic sponsor. And with athletes and visitors coming to Canada, they will most likely be carrying GSM/3GPP phones. And whose network would THOSE roam on? Rogers, who didn't sponsor the Olympics.

      So Bell would be sponsoring the Olympics, but Rogers would be picking up the massive profits from roaming visitors. Naturally that needed to be fixed which is why Telus/Bell (who share equipment) rolled out HSPA equipment post-haste so they could at least get at that roaming profit. Given they have 1x equipment normally, the sensible plan would've been to just install LTE equipment when it became available.

      So yeah, Canada carriers DO gouge, and your data was probably charged at an "innocent" rate of pennies per kB. $750 for 50MB would be 1.5 cents/kB.

    21. Re:50MB = 750$ by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yep... that's the plan he should have signed up for BEFORE he went to Canada. They most likely moved him to that after he called.

    22. Re: 50MB = 750$ by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

      Be thankful he didn't use - dare I even say it - COMIC SANS

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    23. Re:50MB = 750$ by steveg · · Score: 1

      *All* telecom companies are evil.

      But T-Mobile is the least evil available in the US.

      AT&T, on the other hand, *define* evil.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    24. Re:50MB = 750$ by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yep, he seems to have been on the "No data" plan for Canada... then he used data so he had to pay the "overage rate" from the start.

    25. Re:50MB = 750$ by Threni · · Score: 1

      Why do you get charged more when you are abroad, roaming, than a native would get charged? It's the same data, and I can't imagine it's complicated for networks to log usage and bill accordingly. Often you're on the same companies network in both countries!

      It's one of the many reasons i'm on a pay-as-you-go tariff; at least that way I just get cut off when I run out of allowance, and not return home to a comedy £2000 bill for a few minutes usage spread over a few days.

    26. Re:50MB = 750$ by raydobbs · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Guaranteed by your personal credit card? Whose fault is that? If your teaching, get the institution to foot the bill, so if (or in your case - when) they blitz AWS, the institution has recourse to bill the student and you aren't on a express train to financial raping. Your school should never have put you on the financial hook for covering such expenses - at least if they have any credibility.

    27. Re:50MB = 750$ by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 4, Informative

      FYI - carriers don't make money on regular subscriptions.

      Citation needed.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    28. Re:50MB = 750$ by symbolset · · Score: 2

      T-Mobile was awesome when I set up my Google Play Nexus 5 on their prepaid deal. Even sent me a SIM for a 4G tabletwith 250MB/Mo free data for life just in case I decided to buy one of those. I am also concerned about what will happen when they are owned by Sprint. Hopefully after Google Fiber gets going well Google will turn their disruption beam on cellular services.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    29. Re:50MB = 750$ by gaiageek · · Score: 2

      Deutsche Telekom is still the majority shareholder of T-Mobile US, and they don't use matching GSM or W-CDMA frequencies. They do both use GSM and W-CDMA though, so the phones are compatible, though European smartphones are often lacking the correct W-CDMA bands for 3G use in the US. It's even worse with LTE.

    30. Re:50MB = 750$ by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

      He never said "not evil". He said "typical big company evil", which is still evil, just not as bad as "phone company evil". Besides, as others as mentioned, he's talking about the American T-Mobile, which is a good bit different from the European version.

    31. Re: 50MB = 750$ by devman · · Score: 1

      People need to realize that post-paid contract cell phone accounts are *unlimited liability* credit accounts and that you have agreed to pay whatever roaming charges are forwarded to ATT from other carriers that ATT agreed to. There is no incentive to change this practice absent regulation. This kind of stuff on post-paid is why I'm switching to prepaid when my contract is up, as I can control what I spend and what features I want to pay for. I will not be back on post-paid until they allow setting a spending limit like most other forms of credit accounts.

    32. Re:50MB = 750$ by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      it shouldn't have to be outlawed. A good business knows that customers should *never* be surprised and angry when they open a bill. whatever little money you make from sneaking unexpected costs on consumers is more than dwarfed by the bad will. Telcos are always in the top ten most reviled companies. Instead, treat people fairly, be honest about what they are paying and will be charged, and give them protections so they don't accidentally run up the tab.

    33. Re:50MB = 750$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Their alerts are not very timely though. So, sure you can stare at the usage meter and catch it, but it might be days before you get an alert email. I did this for a personal vm, just because I wanted to make sure it didn't go crazy by accident. I set it to $10 and $20 alerts I think. By the time I got the $10 alert it was over $13. Now imagine I was a business and we were talking thousands or tens of thousands.... That's pretty bogus.

    34. Re:50MB = 750$ by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Right, because everyone loves having to maintain *multiple* phone contracts, phone numbers and voicemails, not to mention how freaking tiny and easy-to-drop sim cards have become. We should not have to put up with this crap when we all know they're routing the data between each other using the same technology as a free voip call.

    35. Re:50MB = 750$ by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the EU, it's already tightly regulated; EU roaming is 45c per MB and will be going down to 20c next month.

    36. Re: 50MB = 750$ by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, I panicked when it was AT&T buying them, but that ended well. Fingers crossed on this one.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    37. Re:50MB = 750$ by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is they are charge ass-in-nine rates for only handfull of minutes, When its clear the don't pay even a fraction of that to company you roamed on. Its clear cause how easy they will drop the charges with almost no fight a lot of the time.

    38. Re:50MB = 750$ by ewieling · · Score: 1

      In the USA T-Mobile a reasonable carrier. I don't know about the rest of the world.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    39. Re:50MB = 750$ by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Under my plan (and all T-Mobile plans, apparently), that would be $22.50. If they charged you $150, that sounds like a billing error that you should take up with them. Of course, those rates only apply for now; maybe they were different on your plan at the time you visited.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    40. Re: 50MB = 750$ by cb88 · · Score: 2

      You think you have problems... the UI on this site is so screwed up now I can't get to the settings page to switch it to something else!

    41. Re: 50MB = 750$ by ewieling · · Score: 2

      Sprint is as incompetent as AT&T is evil. Don't think for a moment Sprint won't destroy T-Mobile.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    42. Re: 50MB = 750$ by sconeu · · Score: 1

      My problem with T-Mobile was coverage. I live within the city limits of Los Angeles, and cannot get any signal at my house.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    43. Re: 50MB = 750$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      top right hand corner, to the right of your login name. Click on the circle thing - "User preferences" is the tool tip for that thing.
      click "Postings" on the dialog that pops up.
      in "Comment Post  Mode" select something other than "Code"

    44. Re:50MB = 750$ by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that Bosnia was recently a war zone, so Internet wasn't built up there and still hasn't gotten there to the point it's in USA or Canada yet... you got your data, but there's just not enough equipment there for everybody to be using it all at once.

    45. Re:50MB = 750$ by luther349 · · Score: 1

      maybe then but not now they dumped all the contracts.

    46. Re: 50MB = 750$ by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I got around this for a while by using WiFi calling. They were also one of the first to have the shared home towers.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    47. Re: 50MB = 750$ by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Your browser quite likely has a setting defining what font to use for monospaced fonts (i.e. anything within <tt> tags). Change that to be whatever font you want. I've reset mine to Consolas and find it much more pleasant to read (in Firefox, Options > Content > Advanced (under fonts and colors)).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    48. Re: 50MB = 750$ by greenbird · · Score: 1

      T-mobile is the one of the best value plans around

      Nothing beats Ting.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    49. Re:50MB = 750$ by jrumney · · Score: 1

      But were the charges legitimate (not in error)?

      Since Bosnia is outside the EU, they can charge what they like. I never understood why European regulators stopped at usage within EU when they decided that roaming rates needed to be regulated.

    50. Re: 50MB = 750$ by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I agree, I was just pointing out that the indignation about 50mb seems misplaced, the price is absurd though. Really dig tmo for the free international roaming.

      Even when if wasn't, it was a much more reasonable price, I did a few data bursts when traveling once, and if was around $70 total.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    51. Re: 50MB = 750$ by cb88 · · Score: 1

      If you use data at all on your device even with marginal usage otherwise like me... (I go through 500Mb every few days) then Ting is not for you.... so I'll stick with the $50 tmobile "unlimited plan"

      Apparently I'm part of the 2% .... :/ some people have pointed out rebublic cellular to me as well but the gottcha there is that you have to use a provided phone and you can't tether at all ever.

    52. Re:50MB = 750$ by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      In the EU, it's already tightly regulated; EU roaming is 45c per MB and will be going down to 20c next month.

      I just hope all the carriers have fixed their EU/non-EU tables. About 18 months back I was charged at a non-EU rate while roaming in Italy (with an EU-based SIM) and it took 2 months of arguing to get a refund. Based on forum posts, the problem existed for several months, during which time, no doubt, the carrier made huge illegal profits.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    53. Re:50MB = 750$ by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Apparently the law says you cannot be billed more than a certain amount for going over your data for the month (I believe the overage amount is $50). So once you meet this threshold the tel-cos just nuke your access and send you a SMS asking you to waive your rights granted by said law. Not sure if this tactic is ongoing or just a month by month waiver but it's just another hollow law that had the loophole built in.

      Basically business as usual.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    54. Re: 50MB = 750$ by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      You don't listen to streaming music, do you?

      I used to have a hard time staying within 5 gig per month.
      Now that I have unlimited 4G, I can stream TV too, so I use 200+ gig per month

    55. Re:50MB = 750$ by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      The way that analogy was written, it almost looked like rap lyrics

    56. Re:50MB = 750$ by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Except the SIM card won't work in the ATT locked phone. All the phones ATT sells, are locked, and you need to get the unlock code from them in order to use a different SIM. They don't like to give out the unlock code until your phone is off contract. You might be able to get them to give it to you if you called ahead and told them you were going out of the country and needed to use a local SIM in that country, but I'm not sure what their policy is.

      FWIW, I was going out of the country with a phone that the contract was over with, and called, and they gave me the code, but I don't think it would have been that easy if I was still under contract.

    57. Re: 50MB = 750$ by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yep.. T-Mobile is awesome in the USA. The tethering works great. No ridiculous prices to add SMS.

      Only within the US. To send even a single SMS to other countries, it's $10/month extra.

      Free international roaming

      Only for select countries. There are countries where T-Mobile not only are present, but big, but the Free International Roaming doesn't apply. So double-check the small print before you go anywhere.

    58. Re:50MB = 750$ by arth1 · · Score: 1

      People still buy locked phones?
      I would never buy anything except a never-locked phone not crippled by any provider.

    59. Re:50MB = 750$ by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well to put a positive spin on it. Think of it as a friendly reminder as to why you should leave your regular phone behind when you cross international boundaries and buy a new one on location. You might consider it a bit awkward but remember many countries border police have the right to steal you phone, maybe return it or give you rather nasty hidden free software which is very difficult to remove if it is returned. Don't forget on your return journey to grab the data off that travel phone store in on a usb drive and stick that drive in your luggage in a suitably random spot. Clear that temporary phone of all that personal data and if they take it from you and return it, toss it into the bin or sell it, never to use it again. You should never ever cross international boundaries with your personal digital history stuck in you bloody pocket it is really pretty silly, in our current perverse horribly privacy invasive global society. Don't ever roam, buy local, you can get a pretty decent phone for far less than the roaming charges and its a whole damn lot safer. Do some research before you travel and find a suitable place close to the airport or your initial accommodation to buy that phone. Once you have your travel phone enable call forwarding.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    60. Re:50MB = 750$ by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Communist! Move to the EU for your fancy-dancy limits and notifications about going over some amount and cheap roaming fees.

      We don't need no stinking gov't bureaucrat telling our carriers what they can do to us.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    61. Re:50MB = 750$ by ehiris · · Score: 1

      For the US customers, T-mobile no longer charges extra for International Data Roaming. Which is amazing because I like to travel the world. Their 3G on Ko Phayam in Thailand was faster than any of the hotel WIFIs.

      I hope their merger with the Sprint scum won't affect that.

    62. Re:50MB = 750$ by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Better yet, don't get out of your basement and only play offline single-player games without an Internet connection. And destroy your own ID card while you're at it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    63. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      A real time system for monitoring usage should be mandated by law and sufficient warning should be available.

      Or, you know, demanded by the customer.

      --
      Ken
    64. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article?

      As soon as he crossed the border, AT&T offered him a chance to dig up for international data plan, he choose not to.

      AT&T warned him of the international data rate ($15.36/meg) as soon as they knew he was in Canada.

      When asked, AT&T offered him the chance to retroactively enroll in an international data plan to cover his usage ($30, or slightly more than the 1.5M * $15.36/meg he was warned of when he entered Canada).

      What more could AT&T have reasonably done? Signed him up for an international data plan without his permission?

      --
      Ken
    65. Re:50MB = 750$ by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound that it would stand in court. I think in the US (as here in Argentina), laws are above contracts between private parties. That means that you can't 'waive' rights away, no matter how many papers you sign.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    66. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      So the selfish cellphone company you worked for helped people sign-up for lower-cost data plans AFTER they ran up crazy bills...

      Those bastards!

      --
      Ken
    67. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      You realize it's another country, right?

      In the US cell companies have peering agreements, but the tarrif/tax structure prevents that for cross-border peering agreements.

      AT&T warned him of the rate ($15.36/meg), advised him to sign up for an international data plan, and stopped his service when the charge got excessive ($750), and when contacted put him in a lower-cost international data plan that cost him a fraction of the charges he chose to run up after not choosing an international data plan.

      What more could AT&T have done for him?

      (BTW, he can't plead ignorance - he turned off data before he crossed the border because he knew he didn't have an international data plan and he wanted to avoid the charges.)

      --
      Ken
    68. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      International Data plan, not domestic.

      --
      Ken
    69. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article?

      He knew he didn't have an international data prison, so he turned data roaming off before crossing the border.

      As soon as he crossed the border, AT&T offered him a chance to sign up for an international data plan via text message, he choose not to.

      AT&T warned him of the international data rate ($15.36/meg) as soon as they knew he was in Canada, again, via text message.

      When asked, AT&T offered him the chance to retroactively enroll in an international data plan to cover his usage ($30, or slightly more than the 1.5M * $15.36/meg he was warned of when he entered Canada).

      What more could AT&T have reasonably done? Signed him up for an international data plan without his permission?

      --
      Ken
    70. Re: 50MB = 750$ by kenh · · Score: 1

      Read the article - AT&T alerted him to the costs immediately, offered to sign him up in a low-cost plan, and after he chose not to sign-up for an international data plan capped him at $750 and then STILL allowed him to sign up for a low-cost international data plan to lower his bill by $720.

      Hard to see what more AT&T could have done to help him...

      --
      Ken
    71. Re:50MB = 750$ by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to work for some douche telecom incumbent that charges outrageous roaming charges do you?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    72. Re: 50MB = 750$ by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      doesn't matter. he's pissed that he was charged $750 and now he's telling the world. If ATT can enroll in a data plan for $30, then MBs must be $1, so $15/MB is outrageous. Better to treat customers fairly. Why not automatically enroll him in a (non-renewing) $30 charge, and text him that? that seems like it would result in happy customers that don't tell the world that you're horrible.

    73. Re:50MB = 750$ by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Replace "telecom" with "database" and "roaming charges" with "license charges" and you're spot on.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    74. Re:50MB = 750$ by tibit · · Score: 1

      Oh, so I see you've never had the "pleasure" of attempting to get any bureaucracy to give you a credit card, nor of subsequently getting said bureaucracy to agree with your charges on such card. You know, after all you could defraud them of a $7 latte, so it's obviously better they spend hundreds of manhours micromanaging you. Bureaucrats cost the bureaucracy nothing - it wouldn't exist without them.

      TL;DR: Good fucking luck getting the "institution" to "foot the bill" for anything in the form of providing a credit card for it. LOL. Good for you that you don't have to deal with any of that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    75. Re:50MB = 750$ by visigoth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, too bad, that. I bailed from Sprint's awful service and even worse smarmy lame customer service to T-Mobile, and now I tremble in fear that the one reasonable nationwide carrier may be swallowed and I'll get to choose between 3 flavors of scumbags. I love consumer choice!

      I really really hope this acquisition is blocked, just as the attempt by AT&T was blocked a couple years ago.

    76. Re: 50MB = 750$ by jxander · · Score: 1

      Not sure if teaching institutions are notorious in this manner, but my company couldn't care less if I buy some lattes on my corporate card

      If you are on business travel, you are allowed a per diem rate. Any lattes, omelettes, steaks, clothes, etc that you buy are automatically covered, up to the per diem limit (that limit is based on the cost of living at your travel destination). All big purchases (airline, rental car, hotel) are also purchased with the corporate card, and covered automatically

      If you decide to spend more than your per diem limit, the company pays the max. daily limit, and you're on the hook for the difference. Same goes with the big purchases. If I book a ritzy hotel, or rent a super-luxury car, the company will pay for the "normal" price, and I pay the difference

      --
      This signature is false.
    77. Re: 50MB = 750$ by tibit · · Score: 1

      This isn't about travel, and isn't about corporate world. The guy is doing teaching. As I've said, good luck with getting the bureaucracy of an academic institution let you "use" any sort of a credit card. The modus operandi is to do expense reimbursement. As in: you front the expense, and they will, if you bow low enough, maybe, refund it a month or two later. You better not have cash flow problems when working in academia. I have heard first hand from tenured people in Big 10 institutions whose salary checks have bounced once or twice.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    78. Re:50MB = 750$ by renimar · · Score: 1

      I just got back from Canada, and as soon as I landed at Toronto Pearson I got a text message: Welcome to Canada, roaming charges are $1/minute for calls and $15.36/MB for data (along with a link for 'International Data Plans' which run $30/120MB, $60/300MB or $120/800MB). Needless to say, I turned data roaming off.

      --
      In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
    79. Re:50MB = 750$ by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Say what?
      It's not a contract if you get a foreign sim. It's a non-contract plan. It also takes 10-30 seconds and if you don't know how to do it, the place who offers the foreign sim will do it for you.
      You pay X dollars, and when that X dollars is up? So is your service.

      How do people not understand how international phone systems work? Have you never left the fucking country ever?

    80. Re:50MB = 750$ by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile in the US is different than T-Mobile in Europe. I realize they are owned by the same parent company, but the operate very differently. You are absolutely right that T-Mobile Europe is a piece of shit. T-Mobile US is actually pretty awesome on many fronts.

  3. This by koan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is what monopolies get you, but aside from that why would *anyone* use their US phone for such a thing?
    Buy a sim or get a cheap Canadian burner phone or.... how about just asking directions.

    Data roaming is a scam just like text messages.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:This by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      ^and turn off automatic updates if you do go roaming.

    2. Re:This by gmack · · Score: 2

      Better yet you can use an app like Sygic that downloads the maps in advance. At least this way, you don't care if you are roaming or even if you have a signal at all.

    3. Re:This by Albanach · · Score: 1

      That's still astronomical. There was a time, about twenty years ago when UK GSM providers simply charged you the local rate for service when roaming plus a 15% markup. Local calls were cheap when roaming. Other calls more expensive, but affordable. In the meantime, the cost of calls has plummeted in just about every nation, yet the cost of roaming has soared.

    4. Re:This by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I would because I have T-Mobile, and they don't rape me when I travel internationally.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    5. Re:This by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOL ... my TomTom hasn't incurred roaming charges even once.

      So far it's been compatible with every rental car I've had.

      And no extra fees besides my map updates.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:This by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Same with my TomTom iPhone app. And it's map updates are free.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:This by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      I'm going to plug a free alternative here (not affiliated):
      https://play.google.com/store/...

      Free OSM-based map downloads for pretty much everywhere OSM are available - with update notifications. The interface is not quite up to the level of paid apps when it comes to polish, but it definitely holds its own. I think they make their money off people that use TomTom map data within the app (it supports that too).

    8. Re: This by kenh · · Score: 1

      As soon as he crossed the border, AT&T offered him a chance to sign up for an international data plan (via text), he choose not to.

      AT&T warned him of the international data rate ($15.36/meg) as soon as they knew he was in Canada (via text).

      When asked, AT&T offered him the chance to retroactively enroll in an international data plan to cover his usage ($30, or slightly more than the 1.5M * $15.36/meg he was warned of when he entered Canada).

      When AT&T detected his decision to not enroll was going to result in a very large bill ($750) they cut off data service until he took steps to choose an international data plan.

      What more could AT&T have reasonably done? Signed him up for an international data plan without his permission?

      --
      Ken
    9. Re:This by Mr_Nitro · · Score: 1

      in a closed system like our planet there should be limitations, no more 'unlimited growth' 'unlimited profit' and so on.... companies size should be capped to a certain max size both as employees number and capital. And most importantly the richest manager/owner etc should not earn more than say 20-50 times the lowest wage, End of story...

    10. Re:This by PensivePeter · · Score: 1

      Or buy a Microsoft/Nokia Lumia phone where you can download offline maps to the phone and use the GPS to find your way around without any data roaming need whatsoever. Pretty cool on planes too, a legit way to track where you're flying over while still in airplane mode

  4. You can roam internationally without leaving USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Try going to Point Loma in San Diego. Your phone will switch from US to Mexican cells and back.
    Then you get to argue with the provider about the bill....

  5. AT&T by oldhack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You learned not to touch hot things when you were a toddler. AT&T is one of those things that burn you. Pathetic you learned this now - I blame your parents.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:AT&T by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back in the late Sixties, everyone regarded AT&T as the Acme of Evil, an avatar of the Great Enemy on Earth. The Beast was chopped into bits, stakes driven through the multiple hearts of the bits, and each bit chained and confined to separate parts of the land. People grew complacent, and slowly the separate parts of the Beast began to stir. Tentacles slithered into emerging areas of the telecommunications industry and into the pockets of regulators and legislators. Slowly, the bits began to reassemble themselves into a new form until now it has fully reemerged to prey on the unwary.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    2. Re:AT&T by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      Well said and so very true. They even used a version of the "Death Star" as their logo!

    3. Re:AT&T by dissy · · Score: 1

      While all you said of AT&T is very true, in this particular case the biggest extent of their evilness was selling off the "AT&T Wireless" brand name to a non-AT&T company, thus creating this confusion.

      Remember Cingular Wireless? That is the company that wanted to confuse by changing names, and we now call AT&T Wireless.
      It's mostly even the same management to this day.

      Cingular was/is pretty evil too in fact. The only reason their evil is on such a lower level is the huge head start AT&T had by existing for so damn long.

    4. Re:AT&T by RamiKro · · Score: 1

      Now it's far worse. As a single large entity AT&T was vulnerable to rouge researchers conducting their studies in dusty labs corporate management had little understanding of.
      Nowadays, each separate entity is either incapable or unwilling to support meaningful research. Worse, like Al-Qaeda, the the beast can't be slain by having it's head severed.

    5. Re:AT&T by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      True, but Darth Vadar (or at least his voice) is the one hocking Verizon services. Once you pass those two, you have to decide whether it's worth having pretty sparse cell coverage (2nd tier carriers might be great in your town, but that's never guaranteed if you travel).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. t-mobile by FunkyELF · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... just sayin
    Every one of their new plans they have unlimited data including international.

    1. Re:t-mobile by Voyager529 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... just sayin
      Every one of their new plans they have unlimited data including international.

      It's among the reasons I too am a customer of theirs. It's also what worries me about the Sprint merger. I have a gut feeling that we'll end up with a Sprint-like T-Mobile (not super-evil, but still a huge corp), rather than a T-Mobile like Sprint (a company that seems to go out of its way to make life miserable for Ma Bell and VZW).

    2. Re:t-mobile by machineghost · · Score: 2

      This! My wife went to Mexico recently so I called them to find out what terrible charges she would incur. It turns out text messages are completely free, phone calls are like 20 cents a minute, and data usage ... was either free or similarly cheap, can't remember which.

      F**k AT&T.

    3. Re:t-mobile by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. Sprint doesn't act like a bunch of jerks like AT&T and Verizon.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:t-mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Top-shelf sarcasm, good sir.

    5. Re:t-mobile by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    6. Re:t-mobile by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Unlimited data is not unlimited data, and their international coverage caps out at 1GB.

      Just get a foreign sim card and people can stop dealing with this weird crap where they pay excessive amounts for standard service.

    7. Re:t-mobile by Kenja · · Score: 1

      * unlimited means analog modem speeds past the first 2.5 gigabyte.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:t-mobile by antdude · · Score: 1

      My parents used to use them, but had to go to Verizon because T-Mobile, Sprint, etc. doesn't work in the rural mountain areas. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:t-mobile by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      Free, though you're throttled. You can get the throttling removed for a rate similar to what other carriers charge for international data packages, and you can add or remove it at need. I spent a month in Europe earlier this year though, and found the free data to be quite sufficient. It was fast enough for Skype (completely avoiding the $0.20/min call rates) and even for most app updates and for music screaming. I also sent/received over 1000 messages, a mix of SMS and even MMS, without being charged anything extra.

      T-Mobile US is a great deal.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    10. Re:t-mobile by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      How is their unlimited data not unlimited? I've broken 10GB/month on it without any problems. Maybe if you try really hard to abuse it they care, but for anything anywhere near normal usage they don't. Mind you, I pay a little extra each month ($20) to have the throttling soft-cap removed entirely, and also to get the tethering cap bumped up (is that what you were referring to?)

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    11. Re:t-mobile by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      1) You can raise that cap, or eliminate it.
      2) Sure, if you had some kind of magical analog modem capable of ~200Kbps (EDGE speeds).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    12. Re:t-mobile by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      If you have pre-paid voice and domestic data on T-Mobile they do not offer any way to get any international data, either by pre-paid, monthly payment, or pay as you go.

    13. Re:t-mobile by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Just get a foreign sim card"
      1) Unless you also have a multi-SIM phone, you now also have a foreign number and cannot receive calls to your regular number.
      2) This also assumes that you do not also have to fill out paperwork that will take more time that your stay in the foreign country.

    14. Re:t-mobile by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      You don't need a multi sim phone.

      You take the AT&T sim out, you put in a foreign sim. When done, put at&t sim back in.

      Why the hell would you need a 2nd sim?

    15. Re:t-mobile by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      After 5GB on the ATT "unlimited data", which I am 100% certain to the point of being willing to bet money and/or my life that you have never reached it on mobile data, you are dialed back to dialup speeds. Literally from 12mb/s to 512kb/s. That's what "unlimited" is and why it's in quotes.

      You could hit more than 5GB on wifi, but if you hit 5GB through mobile data and don't have tethering you are sent back to 1989.

      If you pay for tethering, you don't have the same unlimited, and means you are not on the unlimited data plan, either. You're also paying twice for the same usage, so enjoy.

    16. Re:t-mobile by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      So that I can receive the calls to my original number, instead of trying to convince people to change the number they use for a small number of days then switch back.

  7. $15 a meg by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    $15 a meg at least it's not $20 a meg as that is $1000 for 50MB.

  8. happened to me too by alen · · Score: 1

    in laws used 20MB and it cost like $700

    i called AT&T and they took off most of it

    and i explained to my family that next time you go to mexico turn off roaming or pay for an unlocked phone and use a local SIM or buy the international package. i was going to add it on, but i didn't know my inlaws were taking their phones

    1. Re:happened to me too by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the trick though. They charge you $700. You call them, they charge you $70. You are happy because they dropped "most of" the charges. Really they should have only charged you $7 in the first place. They made themselves look like good guys, while at the same time overcharging you. And for every once in a while there's somebody who doesn't call in to get the charges reduced and just pays the bill (like a corporate account), and they make a huge amount of money for nothing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:happened to me too by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "or buy the international package"
      The list of countries included in the international package changes over time. Once it changed on me while I was traveling.

  9. You can roam internationally without leaving USA by MyNicknameSucks · · Score: 3, Informative

    In parts of Niagara Falls, Canada, it's also possible to bounce between US and Canadian carriers.

    I just turn off data roaming for my phone and pick up a SIM for wherever I'm staying.

  10. Newsflash: AT&T Screws Its Customers by machineghost · · Score: 2

    I'm not saying this isn't ridiculous, but is it really Slashdot-worthy news? AT&T has been screwing its customers over on roaming charges since cell phones were invented, and even extreme cases like this one are a dime a dozen.

    Sucks for the OP but it doesn't seem news-worthy to me.

    1. Re:Newsflash: AT&T Screws Its Customers by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no, it's not newsworthy

      but it feels good giving them as much bad PR as we can handle

      post a story like this every other month

      "consumers screwed by oligopolies" category should be a thing

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Newsflash: AT&T Screws Its Customers by reifman · · Score: 1

      I wrote this one for you: http://crosscut.com/2014/06/04...

    3. Re:Newsflash: AT&T Screws Its Customers by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      +1 ;-)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Would have been fine paying $20? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

    ($750/50MB)*1.3MB ~= $20. Ouch!

    1. Re:Would have been fine paying $20? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      $20 is expensive, however it more just payment for using the phone where you really wasn't suppose to. Sure $20 hurts. But $750 could mean not having money to pay your rent/mortgage for the month.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  12. Point Roberts by onkelonkel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a tiny "Island" of America called Point Roberts at the extreme NW corner of Washington State. The Canadians who live right along that border are forever fighting with their cell providers to take off roaming charges because the phone will often pick up the AT&T cell tower on the US side instead of the Telus (or whatever) tower on the Canadian side. The carriers seem quite helpless to fix the problem; some people I know there have to get roaming charges taken off every month.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    1. Re:Point Roberts by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its actually a simple fix if their carier actually cared. A custom PRL for those customers could keep them off AT&T towers in that area.

      A PRL is a prefered roaming list and the phone uses it to have your phone connect to the cheapest signal for them when their tower is not availible or full. You can find tools that may allow you to edit one and instal it yourself. I've done it when a storm made the closest tower to my home unreliable so i made it connect to the next closest one. But i was using an outdated rooted boost mobile phone so i don't know if you need root to do it yourself or not or if any phone will work.

    2. Re:Point Roberts by umghhh · · Score: 2

      ever since operators moved away from manual call switching to SW control call setup there were no reason to charge people per call/duration/volume of traffic other than providing reasons for the customers not to overload network with pr0n. Other than that the costs of network are fixed after the network is built and roaming is configured. This is one thing. The other is that the every phone I had so far (and I had a few) had an option to give user control over the network they wanted to use. Some even had lists of operators that were preferred etc. so where is the problem?

    3. Re:Point Roberts by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, you know, just disable roaming. Every phone I've owned in the last four years, and probably the ones before it, had that option...

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    4. Re:Point Roberts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that PRLs are CDMA-only, so that doesn't help anyone that uses AT&T or Telus/Bell.

    5. Re:Point Roberts by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This happens a lot in the UK too, on the south coast. People get roaming charges for French networks, despite them being 30-40 miles away from the French coast. Mobile signals travel a long way over the sea it seems.

      People who live there turn off roaming, but most people visiting don't even know that option exists or is turned on by default.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Point Roberts by luther349 · · Score: 1

      yep androids even say turning on roaming can incur charges.

    7. Re:Point Roberts by skywire · · Score: 1

      This beautifully illustrates the arbitrariness of the whole thing. It costs not a penny more for the signal to cross the political boundary. Even the old Bell system was just one US/CA network, yet they pretended that crossing that imaginary line somehow cost a great deal. It was always a Big Lie, and so is this.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    8. Re:Point Roberts by gr8dude · · Score: 2

      According to the spec, the SIM card has several files that contain information about the networks the phone is allowed or disallowed to connect to. These files are EF PLMN and EF FPLMN, they can be edited if you have PIN1. They're present in both, 2G SIM and 3G USIM cards. For more details, see section 10.2.16 EF FPLMN (Forbidden PLMNs) of the corresponding ETSI standard.

      This article on PLMN management describes how they can be updated.

      Even though this problem has been resolved a long time ago, in my practice I have not encountered a phone that would offer an interface for editing these settings. So you need to do this with a smart card reader and software that knows which APDU commands to send to the card to make the necessary changes.

  13. Dump ATT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I finally dumped ATT (after twice shutting off my service while having paid them in full) my life took a turn for the better. A week or so after dumping them I got a call from ATT customer retention trying to get me back. When I told them that their billing is messed up and I would rather cut off the end of my finger and write letters in blood using the post office than go back to ATT the rep said "Many people have told me the same thing.". After hanging up I'm not sure she referred to the billing mess or the writing in blood part.

  14. RAZR fro the win! by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    My unlocked, prepaid, 6 year old RAZR works perfectly well as a cell phone all over the world (with local SIM). And I don't have to worry about roaming charges or data plans.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:RAZR fro the win! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Wont any SIM based phone work with a local SIM? Isn't that the point?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:RAZR fro the win! by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      So you pay your "roaming charge" by changing the SIM... that's one way to say "Uh, AT&T, I'm not in my home zone!" by taking their SIM offline.

    3. Re:RAZR fro the win! by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      I too was once a RAZR fan. You should try an LG VU. None of the smartphone bullshit, but has a touchscreen and full keyboard. has a data modem just like the RAZR. Have to charge it every couple days. Prices vary on eBay, but i've paid anywhere from 5 to 45 dollars for them (Im REALLY hard on phones).

    4. Re:RAZR fro the win! by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Funny, my HTC Desire C isn't locked to the Carrier. My last two Motorola Krazr phones weren't either.

      I didn't think you could carrier lock a SIM based phone ... but I could be completely mistaken.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:RAZR fro the win! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Mine isn't. Apple sells unlocked phones from their stores or web page. Lots of stores and webpages sell unlocked Android or dumb phones (I have an unlocked RAZR too). If you buy the locked phone from the carrier, well, you get what you pay for.

    6. Re:RAZR fro the win! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You can do a sim lock on a sim based phone, there's even more than one level of it...

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    7. Re:RAZR fro the win! by umghhh · · Score: 1

      you are mistaken. You can (or at least you could) lock customer's phone in many different ways. They went away from that exactly because people want to use local sim card when they are abroad etc and because this does not provide much of an advantage besides pissing people off - if you get a sponsored mobile you are these days using flat rate tariff i.e. you pay per month etc. and calls are 'free'. As you get sponsored mobile usually if you have a contract there is no added benefit for having phone locked - money is flowing exact the same independently of the SIM card that is inside the phone.This is valid for calls and most of SMS contracts. The capped flat rates are different of course as you pay per volume if you exceed some limits but most of business models in telecom need no locking no more.

    8. Re:RAZR fro the win! by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You're completely mistaken. Nearly all phones sold in the US, whether GSM or CDMA, SIM-using or not, are locked. On SIM-using phones (all GSM and LTE-capable devices, some others), the radio firmware simply refuses to place non-emergency calls if it doesn't recognize the SIM. You can get "unlock codes" which remove this anti-feature... or you can buy factory-unlocked phones, if you look hard enough for them.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    9. Re:RAZR fro the win! by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2

      Yes, you can sim lock such phones. One of the great things about T-Mobile is that they have always unlocked phones for free and without hassle.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    10. Re:RAZR fro the win! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Policy? The government put in a law REQUIRING them to do it. They had no choice. You'll notice they are still charging you $50 to *undo* a restriction *they* put on your phone.

    11. Re:RAZR fro the win! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      All phones are SIM based in the UK and they can be carrier locked. They are usually very easy to unlock though. You can also buy them unlocked even on contract, you just have to go via a third party shop like Phone4U or Carphone Warehouse (why do they always have terrible names?) which are usually cheaper too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:RAZR fro the win! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      or you can buy factory-unlocked phones, if you look hard enough for them.

      Unlocked = previously locked.
      Factory unlocked = provider phones, sold at a discount price from the OEM with the lock removed.

      What you want are never-locked phones.

      Which differ from unlocked phones in that you won't get a crippled phone either - some phones sold through carriers have functionality physically removed or disabled in firmware[*], and unlocking won't change that.

      [*] Like ability to upload files (or certain file types) through USB or BT, NFC, international bands, WIFi hotspot (invisible tethering), 5GHz WiFi, and a few other things. Oh, and without carrier bundled apps you can't remove, and which will re-enable if you disable them.

  15. Time to switch to TMobile by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I switched from Verizon when they screwed me like this (in that case, they refused to reverse a $300 overage charge). I switched to AT&T where I got "rollover minutes" so going over my minutes wouldn't result in that kind of overage. I still ended up paying for random data roaming (which I learned to have turned off before international trips), and when my wife accidentally used my line to call her family overseas. Plus AT&T started finding ways to charge us an extra allotment of data for my wife's cell that would suspiciously jump over the 250MB data line at around the 27th day of billing.

    Now I'm on TMobile, where I don't pay overage for minutes (unlimited!), I have unlimited data (if I use my 2GB high speed, I go to EDGE unless I authorize more data - no overage). I pay no overage for roaming data, or texts. My wife pays $10/mo for being able to call her mom in europe on her cell, again unlimited.

    All in all, we get 5 lines on our TMO account for what we were paying for 2 lines on either AT&T or Verizon. And the quality and coverage is better in almost every way (yes, smaller towns and inside museums/warehouses will result in bad/no coverage for TMO - I don't land in those situations very often at all).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  16. I just had the opposite problem on Verizon by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    Before leaving on my five-week visit to Europe, I enabled Verizon's buck-a-minute Global Voice Roaming on my iPhone, after having the website verify that a 4S could be used overseas. It qualified, but when I got over there I encountered five solid weeks of No Service, and so Verizon got no revenue whatever out of my overseas experience. I, on the other hand, was able to make do by using the Skype app over WiFi.

    1. Re:I just had the opposite problem on Verizon by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The definition of "used overseas" on the Verizon site is that your phone supports GSM. In fact, iPhones before the 4 were GSM-only, which meant that US customers were limited to AT & T as a provider.

    2. Re:I just had the opposite problem on Verizon by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Next time, just call Verizon before leaving and buy a SIM card when you get there. They will unlock the GSM portion of the phone for overseas use. The iPhone 4S has a Micro-SIM slot (even the Verizon version) and you can put in a SIM from any International carrier and save loads over paying roaming fees.

      https://community.verizonwirel...

    3. Re:I just had the opposite problem on Verizon by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Well, or T-Mobile if you broke the SIM-lock on the phone (which was one of the most important reasons for jailbreaking early iPhones).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    4. Re:I just had the opposite problem on Verizon by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to plug in a foreign SIM. I wanted my Verizon account to work overseas so my IT customers could leave messages for me at my regular number and so I could, in critical cases, call back. I wanted to avoid having to tell the world that I would be away for several weeks.

  17. This is why I straight talk on AT&T by Formorian · · Score: 1

    Yes when you cross the border you don't get service (I live in NY near border).

    However, a cheap prepaid sim up in Canada is easy to get at a convenience store or mall.

    So I pay $42.50/month (ebay for wife, discount for auto refill on mine) for unlimited calls/texts/data (LTE speeds for 3gb, 2g/3g speeds after 3gb), and no surprise bills. With my unlocked Nexus 4, just get a cheap sim when you cross a border, go international.

    I tried talking a few people into pre pay, but they don't like it. They like monthly bills and not having to remember to fill every month. I don't get it. Why pay a premium?

    Yes customer service sucks, but I personally haven't had issues with ST. And I can always switch to net10 or another AT&T provider at end of period with no penalties if I want.

    (I use AT&T because the coverage is better then Tmobile and it's sim based. I'd go verizon for their coverage if they did Sim Cards).

    1. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Note that Net10 and StraightTalk are both actually part of the same company (TracFone).

      --
      End of Line.
    2. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by rotaryexpress · · Score: 1

      Switch to Cricket (formerly AIO), best of both worlds. Auto-pay gives discount, same price as Straight Talk, uses AT&T network (like ST).

    3. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by Formorian · · Score: 1

      Not same price, my discount for auto pay is $42.50, cricket is $45, and I get 500mb more in data, however that $10 off per line. Tempting. But so far past almost 2 years been happy with ST. Gonna stick with it for now. But thanks for heads up. Always looking for other MNVO's for ATT.

    4. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by Formorian · · Score: 1

      I know they are. But on net10 my wife had issues with data. My sim card in her phone, data, her sim card in my phone no data. And yeah the CS with tracfone is outsourced, it sux. I can't understand them.

      Why I switched to ST. MMS/SMS/Data/etc all work. Have had no issues.

      In fact using their website to get the APN, her APN is different from mine. I think because mine is an old cut down Sim, and here's is the one made for micro newer.

    5. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by vovin · · Score: 1

      WIND is the T-Mobile provider there.
      Prepaid w/Pentaband phone works great.

    6. Re:This is why I straight talk on AT&T by ToThoseOfUs · · Score: 1

      I was in Canada in 2009 and 2011, both times I was able to easily get a Rogers pre-paid sim card. I used Rogers because I was spending most of my time on the east coast, It worked perfectly fine for the drive from Vancouver to Calgary too.

  18. original iPhone couldn't turn off roaming by bugnuts · · Score: 2

    I ran into this issue when my iPhone was downloading email and roaming.

    ATT billed me $500 and I wouldn't pay it. They tried to blame Apple and I informed them that the iPhone was their issue, too, as they were the only carrier for it. As it turns out, customer service is really collections, and we had a fine yelling match. Finally the lady agreed to send it up the line, and I had her read me exactly what she was going to send, since she did not have my interests at heart.

    They did reverse the charges, and apple added the disable roaming option.

  19. I used to live there by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    And heard lots of stories of people running into this issue. The #1 cause is user error - assuming the phone knows if it's in the U.S. or Canada. Your phone does not know which side of the border it's on; or if it does know via GPS, that info is not tied in with the phone's radio. Consequently, if you're on the U.S. side of the border but the Canadian tower has a stronger signal and your phone is set to allow roaming, your phone may roam on the Canadian tower incurring international roaming charges. Lots of people who live on the U.S. side of the border and never crossed into Canada reported this problem. In all likelihood, the 50 MB of international roaming data probably wasn't during the 1 min he saw the phone connected to a Canadian tower - it was in spurts as he drove near the border and the phone hopped between U.S. and Canadian towers.

    You have to manually turn off roaming (most phones still have that setting - the carriers have only eliminated the force-roam setting). That guarantees the phone will not hop onto a Canadian tower. Only after you've crossed into Canada and the phone (still not roaming) loses signal do you turn roaming back on. That guarantees you'll be using the U.S. towers for as long as possible.

    Generally anybody who regularly crosses into Canada or plans to spend some time there gets a Canadian roaming option. On my carrier 8 years ago (Sprint) it was $5 extra a month, and knocked calls down to $0.25/min and no charge for Canadian roaming data as long as I stayed within my normal roaming limit (less than 20% or so of my total monthly data usage). That actually turned out to be cheaper than getting a second Canadian cell phone (as hard as it is to believe, their carriers are worse than the U.S. carriers). People who live on the U.S. side and never crossed into Canada during the roaming periods used to be able to get the charges removed with a simple call to customer service complaining they were charged for Canadian roaming when they never went to Canada. But a few months before I moved away, I got a letter saying they would be discontinuing this courtesy and I would just have to disable roaming on my phone if I did not want to be charged international roaming, or buy the Canada roaming option (which I already had).

    1. Re:I used to live there by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You have to manually turn off roaming (most phones still have that setting - the carriers have only eliminated the force-roam setting).

      If you don't have the option to turn off roaming, you can also manually select a network instead of setting it to auto.

    2. Re:I used to live there by caseih · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, or even the summary, you'll know the author indeed had roaming disabled. He only enabled roaming for one minute to get google maps to update, then disabled it again. And he also states that he never successfully got any data. Google Maps did not load. 50 MB is a lot of data for an unsuccessful attempt to connect.

      So while your advice is sound, the original author also followed it and still got burned. He would have been happy to pay exorbitant rates for the 1.5 or so MB he actually needed. But not for 50 MB which in all likelihood the phone never used. Thus AT&T is still ripping people off by charging for data that they admit they cannot even accurately track. It is this that he wishes to call attention to.

    3. Re:I used to live there by romons · · Score: 1

      When he turned on roaming, the phone probably started updating his facebook page, downloading every picture Aunt Sally posted of her collection of potatoes that resemble the baby Jesus. That was probably why his google map didn't get updated; it was waiting patiently behind the 750MB of downloads that were queued up.

      with 4G, 50MB isn't much. I just tested my phone, and I average 2.65Mbps. In 1 minute, that is 159Mb, which would have cost $2442 at ATT prices!

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
  20. That's what you get by xednieht · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's what you get for using AT&T - they suck. T-Mobile is the best for people who travel internationally especially Europe and Canada.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:That's what you get by yossie · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Whenever I have had AT&T service, the level thereof was so bad and frustrating that, to me, their brand is TOXIC. I will not buy into anything with the name AT&T on it.

  21. Friends don't let friends use AT&T by mcrbids · · Score: 2

    AT&T is the company that tried to bill me for $thousands of dollars for a few hours of international calls while on their "no worries" international calling plan, that should have cost about $25.

    MetroPCS has a $5/month flat rate international call plan.

    AT&T is the company that tried to get my son to pay $600 for a contract on a phone he never purchased. (He started to buy, then I declined to co-sign because of the $thousands of dollars AT&T had just tried to get me to pay)

    AT&T is pretty much the definition of evil in my book.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  22. thats why i abandoned ATT a long time ago by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    i did some unusual long distance data and phone calls (all within the USA) and they charged be an insanely exorbitant amount of money and i said "NO!" i am not paying that and canceled their service, they occasionally send me snailmail spam to sign up but NO! dont want some outdated dinosaur company run by greedy old men, fuck ATT they can go to hell, i will never use them again

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  23. Death Star by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    You know AT&T's logo looks like the Death Star for a reason!

  24. That's got to be the best article combination ever by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    On the same page at the same time, "AT&T To Use Phone Geolocation To Prevent Credit Card Fraud" (the example for which was credit card transactions in Russia) and "AT&T Charges $750 For One Minute of International Data Roaming". That's brilliant.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. for a more informative data point by sribe · · Score: 1

    I turned on data in France long enough to check my location on google maps once. $44 for that, no "misplaced" charges from before I entered that country, just the actual roaming charge for that data.

  26. It's 2014. by ponraul · · Score: 1

    Why is this still happening like it's 2005.

  27. AT&T billing is crap. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I have an attorney friend with two AT&T cell phone lines.

    A client was disputing billed hours (despite my friend charging a flat rate...); the client was the one continually calling him, asking questions he had already answered over and over...

    anyway, on the AT&T website the link to download detailed call records next to each phone line summary only downloads data from the first line, even though it appears to be separate files; there was no way to download detailed usage data for secondary lines.

    This was causing a HUGE amount of anxiety for my friend, because he couldn't find official call records to match his personal logs, until I figured out that AT&T online billing was providing data for the wrong phone!

    A severe bitch session with AT&T on the phone followed shortly, and after a few escalations and transfers, he got a technician to e-mail a copy of the data he needed.

  28. Nexus 4 Roaming in Europe by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    So I'm planning a trip to Europe -> Netherlands, Germany Austria Hungary. I have a Nexus 4 which I hear works well in Europe.

    What SIM should I get?

  29. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Yes! If you ever drive I-8 (Tucson to San Diego) make sure your phone is in airplane mode.

  30. Ting allows setting usage caps by msk · · Score: 1

    Ting (ting.com) allows setting hard usage caps for voice, SMS and data.

    1. Re:Ting allows setting usage caps by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yep.... and Ting is the phone company out of Canadian company TuCows, the current leader in domain wholesaling.

    2. Re:Ting allows setting usage caps by neminem · · Score: 1

      Indeed - Ting is the *only* non-scummy phone provider I've had any experience with. I'm always happy to tell people about Ting's awesomeness (quite large) - though in this case it's not super relevant, being that it doesn't matter what their international roaming charges would be, as you can't roam very far internationally on Sprint networks anyway.

      Though maybe after the T-Mobile merger...

    3. Re:Ting allows setting usage caps by msk · · Score: 1

      At least you won't get hit with roaming data charges.

  31. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by twilight30 · · Score: 1

    Also South Surrey/White Rock - just last week got to challenge and decline Telus Mobility's $1.50 US roaming charge ('Welcome to the USA!') while on the way to my GF's place.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  32. Re:Use Osmand and download the world into your poc by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1
    I'm...your

    Long Haired Lover from Liverpool

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  33. Re:Congratulations, Slashdot by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    We're just an Okay Business Bureau around here... BBB is somebody else's trademark.

  34. AT&T is the worst for this by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I used to work for an organization where a handful of our users traveled internationally on a fairly regular basis (a few times a year). Because permanent international plans were much too expensive, we "activated" international roaming on an as needed basis. Without fail, every month following an international roaming activation AT&T would fail to restore the account back to its previous plan. The plans always ended up on the most expensive plan AT&T had at the time, completely ignoring the corporate plan that we had with them.

  35. Re:Congratulations, Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Telecom operators do rip you a new one daily. That's no surprise regardless of where you live.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  36. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    Or, you know, use a not-shit phone that supports disabling roaming without entering airplane mode. Jeez, what piece of crap doesn't do *that* anymore?

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  37. Re:Nexus 4 Roaming in Europe by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    It depends on what your phone habits are. If you just receive an occasional call like a minute per day or so then just keep your sim card and use wifi hotspots (a lot of shops and cafés have them).

    If you make a lot of local calls in each country or want to do frequent data traffic without WiFi then get a prepaid card for each country. It depends on how long you are staying too.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  38. Data Roaming by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    Unless you are treating Ebola patients with MSF in the Congo, your overseas travel is most likely in areas bathed in multiple layers of accessible WiFi. Restrict your data use to that. Also, as several others have noted, get a sim from the local shop. It's cheap and easy. You do have an unlocked phone, right?

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  39. Re:Nexus 4 Roaming in Europe by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile US. Then it'll work on all those countries, with no extra costs for data or messages (calls cost a bit extra), and you get to keep your US number while overseas!

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  40. Traffic reports on commercial radio by tepples · · Score: 1

    Which map lets you access live traffic data offline?

    The FM radio app, perhaps?

  41. Prepaid phone by symbolset · · Score: 2

    If you have a prepaid phone there can be no surprises on your bill. If you have a postpaid plan you have written the carrier a blank check. No matter where you are your device can go insane/be hacked and run up insane bills that you have agreed to pay on postpaid - or you can make a simple error like this, which doubtless happens dozens of times a day. This is why postpaid needs a credit check: they are checking out the depth of your pocket, how much you have to lose if they ding your credit.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  42. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    I know a family that lives next to the US-Canada border (their driveway is less than 500 meters from 0 ave.) they had to call their cell-phone provider so often to reverse the charges that the provider started just automatically waiving any roaming charges on their phone because they were sick of getting the phone calls! (Note: They live on the Canadian side).

  43. Sounds familiar by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Many years ago I was also dinged for provably impossible amount of roaming data given duration printed on bill while roaming from AT&T within the US.

    The roaming network was basically old school GSM data service limited to 14.4k for ~5 minutes (and naturally completely useless) claiming I had used about a dozen MB data... this is physically impossible.. it takes about 5 minutes on a perfect day to transfer half of one MB at 14.4k.

    At time suspected something wrong with cutovers between roaming and not...was able to get roaming charges dropped. Little surprised these old-school data pricing structures still exist but not so surprised at all AT&T wouldn't address basic problems within their billing that lead to gross over-charging.

  44. I had a similar issue Italy, 4 phone calls to fix by beltsbear · · Score: 1

    I turned on google maps in Italy. No data made it through and the phone never left Edge mode (2g). Somehow I had $300 worth of charges for 10 mins of trying. More data was billed then edge could have moved during that time if it was maxed out the entire time.

    The first phone call immediate got $25 knocked off but nothing more and was a half hour and two reps. The second call got it to $150 or so as they said they would split it with me. I insisted all along that I got NOTHING out of the attempt and they said they had no power. I was promised a call back by someone who could fix it but that did not happen in the time they said. The third call was an hour, two reps again with promised call back that did not happen. The final call not only got it fixed but they sent me a (useless but sellable) microcell and full credit.

    It sucks that nearly 3 hours of my time and theirs was wasted. The major point that got me my money back was they did not return my calls when they said they would. They insisted the entire time that the data flowed and I was using the internet successfully.

  45. The Guy With Two First Names by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Read Rick Steve's page about an American in Europe and how to use your fone. Roaming, unlocked fones, SIM cards and more. https://www.ricksteves.com/tra...

  46. Can't you limit number of instances? by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Why are you allowing unlimited instances to be created?

  47. Switching of roaming does not always help by thrill12 · · Score: 2

    I regularly cross borders in Europe by car between two countries with roaming switched off on my Samsung Note 3. Without roaming enabled, I *always* had a $0.10 cent charge for roaming, even though I had it *disabled*. Even with roaming disabled, some phones - like Samsung - still send data to the wrong cell. Bug, most likely, but a costly one if you make the trip frequently or if you live on the border. Only thing that helped for me was installing a tool that would switch off data when I turn off the display - since then no more charges. Otoh I do now have to enable data each time I want to look up something, but I accept that minor inconvenience.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  48. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by tquasar · · Score: 1

    I worked near the US Mexico border and could only connect to a service in Tijuana. Camping in the mountains east of San Diego my fone displayed a message about roaming in Mexico, I wondered if it was a Border Patrol spoof to monitor smugglers as I was 25 or more miles from the border. Goto settings and disable roaming.

  49. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    Victoria, BC has it, too. I can't step onto my balcony without getting a "Welcome to the US" text from AT&T.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  50. Gouging by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    I called a relative living about 30 miles away from montreal, Rogers wants $0.35/minute for that call. (I'd love to see the cost for that call)

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  51. Hard to believe... by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

    ...anybody would even be surprised by this. AT&T has been raping consumers for decades. I can't believe you even signed up with those fuckers.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  52. Re:You can roam internationally without leaving US by grim4593 · · Score: 1

    We had a similar experience at my previous job in the Detroit/Windsor area. There were a few of instances where our engineers were working offsite in Detroit and their cellphones would connect to Canadian towers. Our Accounting department would receive bills with several hundred dollars of unexpected international roaming charges even though no one left the country. We also had a portable wi-fi hotspot but no one was willing to use it since the president made us create a sign out form stating that they were responsible for excess charges.

  53. Youtube Videos by infinitelink · · Score: 1

    Don't know if others here are getting this, but if I click to the left of the comments Youtube Videos load and cover the comments page. If anyone else is seeing this behavior on Slashdot, any suggestions to stop it? (I have JS disabled so maybe this is a downside to HTML5 for which will be needed new methods of crippling the shit thrown-into browser by the likes of whoever took-over and ruined Mozilla in the name of "empowering designers!!! TAKE BACK THE WEB [from the user]".)

    --
    Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
  54. Re:Extremely wasteful data use, telco sucker punch by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    What people don't realise is that when roaming, everything is actually backhauled to the home network. So what happens when you roam is that your data goes to the roaming network's towers, then is carried back internationally to your home carrier, then out across the internet, then back to your home carrier, then backhauled to the roaming network, then to your phone. Every phone call, piece of data, or text message, needs to cross the world twice to get to and from you.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  55. being held for ransom by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    If you think this is sick, you should see what they charge you when it isn't even working.

  56. E-mail attached to AT&T Accounts by criten · · Score: 1

    As an Australian who's never visited the Americas, there'd be little purpose for me to ever purchase anything from AT&T. However for years I've received statements and invoices for an American. I tried to e-mail AT&T to ask them to stop but never received any reply. I called AT&T a handful of times and told them about this issue, and received replies like "why does it bother you anyway? Shouldn't you just ignore or delete those e-mails [every 3-7 days for the past 4 years]".

    I did eventually solve the issue... I did a forgot password on the account and received the e-mail for it, allowing me to login. On their web portal the only thing I couldn't change was the e-mail address. So I ordered the customer every additional extra I could, including a new iPhone, without being prompted for any credit card information. Haven't received an e-mail from AT&T since.

    My experience makes me conclude AT&T are a terrible teleco who feel they're exempt from unsolicited e-mail legislation in both my country and the USA, and have absolutely no interest in helping anyone. But I do hope the customer was allowed to keep the iPhone at no cost

  57. It should be obvious. by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Clearly the problem here is not AT&T or this simple consumer. The problem is nation states. If we didn't have borders, international roaming wouldn't exist.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  58. Good reason to switch!!!! by alex.taylor084 · · Score: 1

    This kind of crap is a good reason to switch to T-mobile. I'll check it out before I go overseas next, but it looks like international is essentially treated like national rates.

  59. Re:In Other News... An Idiot with His Cell Phone by david672orford · · Score: 2

    How is this even news? AT&T clearly publishes their international roaming rates, their international calling rates, and their international data roaming rates. Cell phones have been in existence for 40+ years. If you can't read your own calling plan nor your own contract details, and if you can't afford the roaming rates, please turn your cell phone off, and while you're at it, please turn off your tendency to flame technology news sites when you pull a dipshit maneuver.

    $750 for 50mb of data transfer is highly exploitive. It is about 50 times even the usual sucker rates. It is exploitive even if most users know about it.

    This is like buying a coke in an airport with a credit card expecting to pay something unreasonable such as $7 and coming home to find a bill for $750. Most people would consider that fraud even if the price had been posted on the menu.

  60. Or... by kenh · · Score: 1

    What is the story here?

    He knew his data plan was US-only, that's why he turned off data when he crossed the border.

    As soon as he crossed the border, AT&T offered him a chance to sign up for international data plan, he choose not to.

    AT&T warned him of the international data rate ($15.36/meg) as soon as they knew he was in Canada.

    When asked, AT&T offered him the chance to retroactively enroll in an international data plan to cover his usage ($30, or slightly more than the 1.5M (the estimated usage of the one google map search he *chose* to use after turning data back on in Canada) * $15.36/meg rate he was warned of when he entered Canada).

    What more could AT&T have reasonably done? Signed him up for an international data plan without his permission?

    At what point do his decisions to:
    - live near the border
    - purchase a US-only data plan
    - not sign-up for an international data plan when offered

    Become the fault of AT&T?

    --
    Ken
  61. verizion did that to me after landing in mexico by madmatty · · Score: 1

    Went on a trip to cabo mexico and when I landed, I turned on my phone to see the time/calls etc.. i had a few apps using auto update unfortunately and they finished updating before I even got the notice I was ROAMING, and giving me the option to select an intl data plan. by the time I shut everything off they had me at a 400$ charge, to which 7 calls and multiple tiers later I finally got reimbursed $450 for the waste of time

  62. $750 for one map? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    That makes the price of a one-time "how to use a map" training course, a basic compass, and a map for the city/ country that you're going to look positively good value. Of course, that also requires a little forethought and planning, plus the common sense to pick up a map when you arrive at your destination (if you're travelling on an emergency call out), but these are still low-priced commodities. Apart from the common sense.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"