Slashdot Mirror


The Daily Harassment of Women In the Game Industry

An anonymous reader writes: Brianna Wu, leader of a game development studio, has an article exposing the constant harassment of women in the games industry. She says, "I'm not writing this piece to evoke your sympathy. I'm writing to share with you what prominent, successful women in the industry experience, in their own words." She goes through the individual stories of several women targeted by this vitriol, and tries to figure out why it happens. Quoting: "We live in a society that's sexist in ways it doesn't understand. One of the consequences is that men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women. ... This is why women are socialized to carefully dance around these issues, disagreeing with men in an extremely gentle manner. Not because women are nicer creatures than men. But because our very survival can depend on it. ... Growing a thicker skin isn't the answer, nor is it a proper response. Listening, and making the industry safer for the existence of visible women is the best, and only, way forward."

628 of 962 comments (clear)

  1. Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It isn't only women who dance around issues when socializing with the other sex. Men gets very soft around women. If you think they have a harassing attitude you should see how men treat other men.

    1. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True. Tom Brady can't argue that his ass isn't nice.

    2. Re:Pft by Fulminata · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She's not talking about comments like "nice ass" as much as she's talking about comments like "die, you fucking cunt!"

    3. Re:Pft by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I hear, death threats are quite normal in the video games industry. Certainly the vitriol flies on gaming forums (can't imagine how busy the moderators for official game forums must be). This article seems to boil down to "but women get rape threats too". OK, sure, men don't often get those, fair point. But in an industry thick with death threats, how many developers or commentators have actually been lynched by angry fans since the beginning of time? Roughly zero? It's not rational to actually be creeped out or worried about this stuff.

      For goodness sake, Jack Thompson is still alive and well. If any of these threats of violence could be taken seriously, he'd be the first casualty. Think you're more hated than that guy?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Pft by Boronx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh yeah. In case you didn't notice, men killing women is kind of a problem.

    5. Re:Pft by WarSpiteX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're talking about work.

      FYI, men killing men is a much bigger problem.

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    6. Re:Pft by toejam13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Melodramatic? Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when women are playing with men? I've heard guys who threatened to hunt down their female opponents so they could rape them and murder them just because they got their ass handed to them in a game. That is not juvenile "boys will be boys" behavior. That's somebody who might violently act out if the right circumstances (alcohol, drugs, peer pressure, stress, etc..) were to happen.

      That's just gaming. You should read some of the stories about women who get involved in politics. Some people get really unhinged when you attack their personal values. Then you have some guys who go completely off the deep end when it is a woman doing it. Threats of murder come quickly and often. It is sadistic and it is ugly.

    7. Re:Pft by Fulminata · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. It's not so much about workplace harassment as it is about harassment because of their work.

      Unfortunately, the summary doesn't really make that clear.

    8. Re:Pft by WarSpiteX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll grant you all your points. Women are singled out.

      Until there are too many women to single out.

      The same thing happened when women went to work, when they went to medical school, when they went into politics, as you said. And eventually, they become accepted by their peers, and any hate they get from the public is just like the hate that their male counterparts get from the public. Except that instead of "Go fucking smoke some pole, you Kenyan Muslim faggot", they hear "Get your bitch-ass in the kitchen, you stupid cunt."

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    9. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been told that I'll be hunted down and murdered (not raped tho, usually - I'll give you that) as a man playing with men.

      I've had been threatened to be sodomized, tho, while I was moderating an average sized forum, several times, not including death threats and general madness that filled up my inbox.

      Your point?..

    10. Re:Pft by WarSpiteX · · Score: 5, Informative

      I invite you to visit any developer's forum. Particularly for multiplayer games that get frequent patching.

      Then tell me that they don't face harassment, irregardless of gender. People pick on whatever sticks out. Is the developer Russian? Russian insults. Are they of Chinese descent, and he comments? Expect some variation of "ching chong chow chee ho lee fuk sum ting wong chang chong ching wang chinky chong" in response.

      If it's women, they get picked on for being women.

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    11. Re:Pft by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The particular phrasing of the threats may be selective based on the gender, race, sexual orientation, etc. of the person being insulted.

      But I think a more important issue is whether or not women are getting more vitriol than are men, regardless of the particular phrasing. For example, if 20% of women players get called cunts, and 20% of gay male players get called faggots, do those women have a point about being singled out? I'd argue no.

      However, if 20% of female players get treated with scorn, and only 3% of male players do, then the female players have more of a fair point about being singled out.

    12. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For my country, Australia, I've just looked up some stats:

      Homicide victims by sex (see first plot)

      Homicide offenders by sex (see second plot)

      They don't show the raw numbers but, reading roughly off the plots, homicide victims are ~70% male, and homicide offenders are ~80% male, in the most recent year of stats (2006-07). So, assuming there's no particular correlation for e.g. offenders to kill people of their own sex, we'd expect the following problems to ranked in decreasing severity order thusly:

      men killing men
      men killing women
      women killing men
      women killing women

      (Personally, I'd prefer it if we just treated all murder as a problem.)

    13. Re:Pft by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Melodramatic? Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when women are playing with men? I've heard guys who threatened to hunt down their female opponents so they could rape them and murder them just because they got their ass handed to them in a game. That is not juvenile "boys will be boys" behavior. That's somebody who might violently act out if the right circumstances (alcohol, drugs, peer pressure, stress, etc..) were to happen.

      That's just gaming. You should read some of the stories about women who get involved in politics. Some people get really unhinged when you attack their personal values. Then you have some guys who go completely off the deep end when it is a woman doing it. Threats of murder come quickly and often. It is sadistic and it is ugly.

      That's why I don't do voice chat. Letting random strangers whisper in your ear is a terrible idea.

      I'm male, I've had men threaten all the same bullshit you just said. I think what women mis-understand about men is that men do this to men as well. I've been violently assaulted by other men before. In highschool I was put into the hospital. The "perpetrators" didn't even get suspended. I've had my tires slashed, guys show up at my house with baseball bats wanting to fight only to find out I'm armed to the teeth and that bats not going to do them much good.

      I know a lot of guys don't get that sort of thing, but a lot of us do. Women aren't the only victims, and turning male violence into a womens issue is somewhat insulting. Men don't talk about it like women do because of social stigma, but it's a real problem. In the workplace if a man even smiles funny at a women he's walked out the door. The same man threatens violence against another man and it's treated as a joke. At least women have some legal and social protections. If you don't think it's true, here's a thought experiment for you... a Man shows up at work with a black eye... what's your first reaction? Now a woman shows up with a black eye... why should your reaction be any different based on their sex?

    14. Re:Pft by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She's not talking about comments like "nice ass" as much as she's talking about comments like "die, you fucking cunt!"

      Why is this moderated troll?

      The very first paragraph of the article says she got a death threat and that they know where she lives. Do people even read the articles before moderating anymore?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    15. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice being a straight cis white male when a venue is dominated by other straight cis white males, isn't it?

      And just to make clear, the problem of insulting people isn't along the lines of "ching chong chow chee" or whatnot. The problem case is along the lines of:

      Scenario 1:

      Man: "What does that do? Sorry, I don't know perl."
      Crowd: "You don't know perl? Geez, you're stupid."

      Scenario 2:

      Woman: "What does that do? Sorry, I don't know perl."
      Crowd: "Geez, women are stupid."

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    16. Re:Pft by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      She's not talking about comments like "nice ass" as much as she's talking about comments like "die, you fucking cunt!"

      "I hope someone rapes him in the ass." "I'm going to cut off your balls and rape your throat with them." And several other comments from women in various work places. Thinking that this is a singular issue, tied to only women need to dig their heads out of their ass.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a bit of a difference in that one in every four women actually will be raped in their life, and a sizeable percent of those getting those threats already have been.

      Yes, men are raped too. About 91% of rape cases are male->female, 8% male->male, 0.8% female->female, and 0.2% female->male. Men are virtually always the perpetrator, but even when the victim is male (not nearly as common, but still way more common than we as a society should accept), the perpetrator is still overwhelmingly likely to be male.

      (and if the excuse for the stats is "men aren't as likely to report being raped by a woman because of shame"... so is there no shame for a guy to report being sodomized against his will by a man?)

      The basic point is: when you're threatening a violent crime against a person who may well have been a victim of such, and even if they haven't, very likely has friends who have and is more than aware of their vulnerability in this regard, that's taking it to a whole different level.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    18. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You realize that there's more difference between your average man and your average woman than between your average NFL linebacker and your average man, right? (seriously, compare the stats some time - height, average bench strength, etc). You do realize how commonly women are raped and abused by men, and how they might happen to be more sensitive to the implicit or explicit threats of violence from someone that they're highly unlikely to be able to fight off?

      I'm tall, 182 centimeters, and I still once had a guy literally pick me up and carry me back to his apartment when I tried to walk away from him.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    19. Re:Pft by Zaelath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but she has a game "close to launch". Google her name -> Giant Spacekat -> Revolution60.

    20. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      RAINN disagrees with your bogus statistic. Source please.

    21. Re:Pft by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You realize that there's more difference between your average man and your average woman than between your average NFL linebacker and your average man, right?

      Oh, geeze, don't let a feminist hear you say that! Every time someone suggests women maybe aren't suitable to being firefighters or combat soldiers, the wymins go apeshit.

      You do realize how commonly women are raped and abused by men, and how they might happen to be more sensitive to the implicit or explicit threats of violence from someone that they're highly unlikely to be able to fight off?

      According to the newest stats, not really that much more often than men are abused or raped by women. Domestic violence cases split almost 50/50. Sexual violence victims are still mostly women, but men come in very close behind now that we've stopped defining "rape" in a way that makes it impossible for women to be rapists.

      And men being abused by men ... holy shit. If we took your approach, every man in the world should be "more sensitive to the imiplicit or explicit threats of violence", to the point where we'd pee our pants as soon as another man looked at us funny.

      Difference is, men don't try to justify freaking out and overreacting by pointing to statistics. And neither do most women, for that matter; the ones who do are just a very loud minority.

    22. Re:Pft by WarSpiteX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So *what* how they phrase it?

      If you were Black Man who doesn't know perl, the crowd answer would be "dumb nigger".

      People are assholes. They'll just pick on whatever is different about you.

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    23. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess you're ignoring the rapes that occur on a daily basis in prison because then women wouldn't be the primary victims of rape?

    24. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something like reports referenced here, probably, conflating any unwanted sexual advances with rape.

      But is that figure accurate or even plausible? Research on sexual assault is notoriously hard to conduct, and the studies are wildly inconsistent. A 2003 Bureau of Justice Statistics special report, "Violent Victimization of College Students, 1995-2002," found that among the nation's nearly four million female college students, there were six rapes or sexual assaults per thousand per year during the years surveyed. That comes to one victim in 40 students during four years of college—too many, of course, but vastly fewer than Ali's one in five.

      The study cited by Ali used an online survey, conducted under a grant from the Justice Department, in which college women were asked about their sexual experiences, on campus and off, and the researchers—not the women themselves—decided whether they had been assaulted. The researchers employed an expansive definition of sexual assault that included "forced kissing" and even "attempted" forced kissing. The survey also asked subjects if they had sexual contact with someone when they were unable to give consent because they were drunk. A "yes" answer was automatically counted as a rape or assault. According to the authors, "an intoxicated person cannot legally consent to sexual contact."

    25. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Firstly if you think that threats in an fps are legitimate please cite one example.
      Also every single person who has played an fps knows that those kind of threats are status quo for their domain. I'm male and had similar threats levied against me. Only it was "ass rape" and me and everyone I know was targeted. It's all BS fueled by the hormones of the game's target demographic.

      If you think that males don't receive these same responses then you're diluted.

      Talk to me when women are lining up to complain that they don't get fair treatment from military "selective services". That's true equality .

      -donkeybaby

    26. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you were Black Man who doesn't know perl, the crowd answer would be "dumb nigger".

      People are assholes. They'll just pick on whatever is different about you.

      That's not just being an asshole, it's being a racist asshole. Similarly, the comments about women are from sexist assholes.

      Not everyone's an asshole. And all assholes are bigoted, or bigoted in the same way.

    27. Re:Pft by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Do people even read the articles before moderating anymore?

      Seriously? They don't read them before commenting on them. Half the time I don't think they even read the summary.

    28. Re:Pft by Intron · · Score: 1

      And her quote "But because our very survival can depend on it" ... really? Really?! Melodramatic, much? When's the last time a female developer was ever assaulted at work? And no, "nice ass" doesn't count as a threat to your life, though it is a crude remark (unless you're Tom Brady).

      I know one. Her manager got mad and grabbed her by the throat. He didn't even get back to his cubicle. He got walked out the door by HR, told to wait at home to find out if the woman would press charges. Real companies take these things seriously.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    29. Re:Pft by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      That is not juvenile "boys will be boys" behavior.

      Yes it is. Grow up. Stop crying like a baby. Learn to deal with internet trash talk for what it is. You whine just like those anita sarkeesian feminists. It's much more likely that you are lashing out for being owned by those players, than it is they actually intend to hunt anyone down.

    30. Re:Pft by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Scenario 2 is basically what feminists are doing to men. A few men do something, and now suddenly we need pervasive, invasive, due process rights destroying changes to the law, making it toxic for ALL men. We're also supposed to accept the denigration of masculinity in all aspects of culture and life as some kind of penance. Those who question it are labeled misogynists. Fuck that.

      I'll bet that the anecdotes depicted in this article were actually subjected to scenario 1, and took it personally instead of constructively. The reality is that ALL developers get trash talk like that, not just women. I don't see why they should be singled out for special sympathy. Even developers of successful games get vitriol from some players. If the game sucks, the devs get more. We don't sympathize with derek smart do we?

      I'm tired of being told both that women are 'equals' while also being told that I'm responsible for their emotional well being. Either women are adults or they are children. They need to decide which way they want to be treated. The fact that comments have been disabled on the article speaks volumes about the logical integrity of the post.

    31. Re:Pft by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

      Fuck. Accidentally moderated this "funny". Posting to cancel it out.

    32. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And when you were being carried you could have ripped his ears off or dug your fingers in and starting ripping flesh off? I keep hearing people talking about equality then saying all females need protecting from males by males. You can't have it both ways. Your security is only your problem. If you're concerned about being attacked, you learn martial arts to help mitigate that risk. If you don't think it's worth your time to do that, then you're not too concerned. People make time for the important things in their life. Males don't whine about them not being able to defend themselves from someone stronger, they take action to learn how to defend themselves.

      It's strange how people always ignore most sex traits to claim males and females are equal in all abilities, except strength. While true in the average sense, it's still an excuse.

    33. Re:Pft by phorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a straight male, I've been called Noob, loser, moron, fag (though it doesn't apply), n*gga (though it doesn't apply), whatever.

      As much as I hate internet tracking, something I wish it was a little better in terms of these losers. Maybe if the game corps could better track the useless trolls and accept feedback then things would clean up.
      DOTA2 had a $10m tournament this year. It's big news. Yet the only real categories they have for reporting are the broad "communication abuse" and then feeding/etc. Maybe if had better ways of identifying (and warning/enforcing) the racist, sexist pricks we could clean some of this crap up. Steam and Origin capture most of the non-console game market, so getting a perma-ban from multiplayer on both platforms (not just the game, but the whole thing) would go a long away to showing that this shit isn't acceptable.

    34. Re:Pft by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and if he grabbed a man by the throat, what would've happened? what if she assaulted him? what then? The difference in responses would be astronomical. 'Real companies' just don't want lawsuits. The lawsuits come from badly written laws that give one side the upper hand by default, truth be damned, for the sake of votes. Those laws are sexist and should be stricken from the books. Real companies don't let the stakes get to the point where passive-aggressive social dynamics are causing employees to assault each other.

    35. Re:Pft by gmack · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I doubt it. You don't get a lot of men being asked If the carpet matches the drapes I think the real problem with gamers in general is that you get a lot of "type A" competitive personalities without any social skills to temper their behavior. Throw in the fact that, for a lot of gamers their only actual experience of actual females is either from watching porn or interacting with booth babes and they just don't realize that both are fictional.

    36. Re:Pft by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      The basic point is: when you're threatening a violent crime against a person who may well have been a victim of such, and even if they haven't, very likely has friends who have and is more than aware of their vulnerability in this regard, that's taking it to a whole different level.

      Unfortunately, I have encountered women and men with such experiences and you are right.

      I think we also have to look at the kind of people issuing those threats in the gaming forums. Realistically they're unlikely to have social interaction beyond gaming and their life experiences is gaming. I doubt they have the compassion or sensitivity to understand the damage they do and are taking out their pent up frustrations on women.

      Their lack of confidence when faced with a real woman would more than likely make them fumble and stutter and I doubt they would have the confidence to approach a beautiful woman at all. So when a woman is in this deodorant lacking, personal hygiene optional, gaming world, those barriers are eliminated and they somehow feel entitled to vent and direct their frustrations.

      Gamers live in the game world, where such threats are meaningless, flesh wounds are repaired with a healing pack and a new life is just a game away.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    37. Re:Pft by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      Yes and ever since they invented that "slap people over the internet" app patriarchy has grown ever stronger, right?

    38. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 1

      I've been seeing how men treat other men for a very long time now, and it is in general not even remotely similar to the kinds of abuse that the women I know take for granted in gaming communities. Like, for instance, I can post about how I like a game someone else dislikes, or dislike a game they like, and no one who thinks I'm male will threaten to rape me for it.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    39. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're not even close to the same frequency. I know people of both genders in the game industry. The guys regard death threats as an exceptional event, and might not see one in any given five-year period. The women, if they're at all visible, get them pretty much constantly.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    40. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's actually really easy to check this out, because you can use whatever name you want on the Internet.

      Someone decided to prove that women were just whining, recently.

      What happened? He lasted two hours. Then he deleted the account, because he couldn't take it. The women I've talked to report that what he encountered is normal for them.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    41. Re:Pft by nut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ... one in every four women actually will be raped in their life ...

      citation needed.

      --
      Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    42. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right, white men don't ever suffer insults or attacks on them simply for being white males.

      Oh wait, you just did that. This sort of crap is what white men have to deal with. This suggestion that everyone in the world is a victim except us.

      Everyone is deserving of all sorts of special considerations and we're deserving of nothing.

      If we complain its just a sign of our racism or sexism.

      Everyone is allowed to offer opinions about us. Tell us why we feel one way or another about anything. But if we try to say why someone else feels something then you say "You don't know what its like to not be a white man"...

      Well that's interesting. White men are apparently the only group of people on earth not gifted with fucking telepathy.

      People presume to tell us what we think and we're often not even allowed to say why we think something. How many times have white men been told that they don't even know how racist they are? That our racism or sexism is subconscious.

      Which means not only are we not allowed to say what other people think but we're not even afforded the right to say what WE think.

      And it is in this environment that you presume talk to us about all this PC bullshit?

      And they wonder why we get upset. Its bullshit. This is a bullshit issue. Ladies can toughen up like the men or admit they want to be treated differently and get treated like girls.

      Their choice. The big problem we keep running into over and over again is that people keep trying to eat their cake and have it too.

      People keep asking for equality AND special treatment. No.

      You're either equal or you're not.

      People keep asking for rights but take no responsibility for themselves. No.

      If you're not responsible for yourself then you're not entitled to the rights. An example would be children... they're not responsible and so they don't have adult level rights.

      Just what is... If you want the one you've got to pay with the other just like everyone else.

      I'm not asking for anything that I don't ask from myself.

      Oh I know, I'm a privileged white male and I don't know how hard it is... It doesn't matter. That argument just says you need protection. Fine. Happily provided. But the instant you cash that check the equality argument goes out the window. You're a protected class at that point. Not an equal.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    43. Re:Pft by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      âoeThey must have heaps of cash and theyâ(TM)ve got to have a package between their legs, letâ(TM)s be honest,â âoeI donâ(TM)t need them to speak, they donâ(TM)t even need to speak.â Direct quote from a female Australian senator. On the radio. Now reverse that - a male saying something about rich and big-busted, and their career would be finished. Sexism is alive and well, but it's not just men.

    44. Re:Pft by WarSpiteX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't get a lot of women being told they're neckbearded losers living in their momma's basements because they have micropenises, either.

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    45. Re:Pft by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      And just to make clear, the problem of insulting people isn't along the lines of "ching chong chow chee" or whatnot. The problem case is along the lines of: Scenario 1: Man: "What does that do? Sorry, I don't know perl." Crowd: "You don't know perl? Geez, you're stupid." Scenario 2: Woman: "What does that do? Sorry, I don't know perl." Crowd: "Geez, women are stupid."

      No, you're wrong, you didn't even read the article (should I say you are stupid?). Specific examples from the article, if you'd like to read it:

      "Only 1 out of 5 is hot, and that is Jessica. The rest need to be in the kitchen."
      "I have a guy who’s writing fan fiction starring me and him. It’s a pornographic fanfic, and he's on chapter 6. He anonymously submits chapters through my website"
      "Rape fantasies and pictures of dead children were coming faster than I could block individual users."

      That is the kind of thing we are dealing with.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    46. Re:Pft by msobkow · · Score: 1

      And have you listened to what those types of gamers say to everyone they play against? We're talking about mouthy juvenile delinquents of varying ages who've never evolved beyond that of the 12 year old. They're assholes to everyone and they threaten everyone with disembowlment, murder, and other such crap. The only "special" insult they make to women is rape, because they know that will piss them off. And that's all that sort cares about: pissing the opponent off.

      Maybe the game industry is worse than others -- I don't know; I've never worked in that sector. But I have never seen women in banking, telecommunications, government, financial services, or the aeronautics industries be subjected to any more or any less jibing and insulting than "the guys" on the team were. Maybe there is just something about gaming that attracts demented juvenile delinquents, but everyone at work received about the same level of respect from their co-workers everwhere I worked over a 30 year period in the tech industry.

      Then again, I've been out of the industry for almost five years now. Maybe society has taken this mad rush to the bottom in the intervening five years. If so, that's sad, because tech used to be one of the few industries where women and men were judged more on their skillz than anything else.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    47. Re:Pft by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      Damn. Forgot the character thing. The point still stands if you can interpret it.

    48. Re:Pft by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You gotta be careful though. What do you mean by 'social skills'? Some would say this means "you just need to know how to talk to women". Why doesn't this apply to women as well? The post itself mentions something about women having to 'talk nice' to men to be heard, and that it's oppressive. Sorry, but if it's good for the gander, then it's good for the goose.

      Of course men don't get asked that. Most men don't care about such things. The fact women get asked is because they typically DO care about such things. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that humans are sexually dimorphic, each sex having different imperatives. Really, no one should be giving a shit about the carpet or drapes at work because they should be too busy working to notice.

      The rest of your statement is stereotyping, which is something else that feminists claim is oppressive. Why do you think it's ok to do it to men, or in this case, male gamers?

    49. Re:Pft by schnell · · Score: 1

      "I hope someone rapes him in the ass." "I'm going to cut off your balls and rape your throat with them." And several other comments from women in various work places.

      Are you saying that women have said this to you or about you in an actual business workplace setting? If so, where do you work? If not, what do you mean?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    50. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to the newest stats, not really that much more often than men are abused or raped by women. Domestic violence cases split almost 50/50. Sexual violence victims are still mostly women, but men come in very close behind now that we've stopped defining "rape" in a way that makes it impossible for women to be rapists.

      and what is this magical definition for men being raped by women almost as often as the reverse?

    51. Re:Pft by phorm · · Score: 1

      I represent that remark. The fact is that men are expected to want sex, so unless it's guy-on-guy or somebody twice your age, it's not taken seriously.
      That said, I'd imagine that penetrative rape - the type commonly suffered by females - is a lot more traumatic.

    52. Re:Pft by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I often get sexual fanfic and photoshops of myself and the other developer on my team.

      Huh......pics or it didn't happen

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    53. Re:Pft by russotto · · Score: 1

      The only "special" insult they make to women is rape, because they know that will piss them off.

      Really? Did they stop threatening male players with buggery?

    54. Re:Pft by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Apparently, by legal definition in Texas, only a man can 'Rape' since it requires a penis.

      So yes, the statistics are skewed.

    55. Re:Pft by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Then they aren't 'real companies', just 'companies'. bwahaha!

    56. Re:Pft by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that women have said this to you or about you in an actual business workplace setting? If so, where do you work? If not, what do you mean?

      Not me, but I've seen it said about others. I've worked in several jobs when I was younger which were female dominated such as harness making(for industrial applications, and wire harnesses for aircraft). I've also seen it happen in fortune 500 companies, and I've seen it in warehouses and distribution centres.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    57. Re:Pft by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      /* so is there no shame for a guy to report being sodomized against his will by a man? */

      Speaking as a man, I would much prefer admit I'd been sodomized against my will by a man than raped by a woman. Either scenario sucks, but most men can understand some gigantic physical specimen of a psycho raping another man, or being gang raped in prison. Almost no man wants to admit that some "girl" fucked him against his will, or used her position of power to gain "sexual favors" as a metric of job performance. Sorry.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    58. Re:Pft by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The text is a nice, manipulative propaganda piece. While I don't know women in the game industry, I know several female engineers, in EE, CS and some other fields. Some of them are very attractive, some are more plain. (I don't mind either way, conversation is far more important than looks.) Now, from their comments, there is no specific discrimination against women in tech. Some think there may be a slight bias either way, but not anything significant. Of course, incompetent women get yelled at and derided just the same as incompetent men, but they though that was rightfully deserved. And the one thing that they universally find quite repulsive is women playing the "women card" to get ahead instead of demonstrating solid skills. Most of them have observed that happening.

      My conclusion is that this is nothing but a part of an ongoing power-grab effort by styling women as victims and men as primitive cave-men.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    59. Re:Pft by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      That said, I'd imagine that penetrative rape - the type commonly suffered by females - is a lot more traumatic.

      Assuming a completely unwilling and unaroused victim, yes, I very much suspect it would be. However, feminists and victim-advocacy groups have spent the last couple decades telling us that "rape is rape" and that they're all equally bad, so it would be a bit hypocritical for them to now start screaming "BUT WE HAVE IT WORSE!".

    60. Re: Pft by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Freedom of speech.

      Steam are not the government. They don't owe you anything. You're welcome to set up your own games company with freedom of speech as a founding principal if you so desire.

    61. Re:Pft by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Can you please post those stats, and a source? When people make claims like this, it's important to back them up and they be scrutinized.

      And if you're reply is "look them up yourself", well, I'm not the one making the claim. It's your responsibility to provide evidence.

      --
      AccountKiller
    62. Re:Pft by deathguppie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A certain part of what he said ( not all) does ring true to a lot of us (male devs).. if you've worked on games, and I've only worked on open source games. Then you've gotten hate mail. People say the rudest most hurtful things they can think of and target you. The first time it happened to me, I was angry, humiliated, stomped around the room.. it was awful. Then it happened again, and again.

      personally I would put the pornographic fanfic in a different category as the rest of the insults in the article simply because it didn't sound like it was someone just trying to insult the person. It just sounded creepy. I had a girl when I was in my twenties, whom I told that I wasn't interested in her that way call me repeatedly and just breath into the phone when I answered.. that was creepy. Being a guy didn't make me feel better about it either, I didn't know if she would try to cut my brake lines in my car, or burn my house down with me in it. It sucked.

      All of the things mentioned in the article are truly lame, and should never happen to anyone , but I don't see them as sexist per se. It's more just about how shitty the world is. Sexism, seems more about inequality. Women getting lesser pay, having less opportunity in the work place. That is something everyone can agree on. But if you just want to claim that all shitty things that happen to women are due to sexism, then everyone else is going to start thinking about all the shitty things that happen to them, and wonder why your shitty things should garner more special attention than any one else's. It sucks to have people single you out for insults, but it sucks worse when it's someone keeping you from getting a job, or a pay raise, or not allowing you to drive, or vote, or wear pants. That's sexism.

      --
      once more into the breach
    63. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh for fuck's sake.

      I never thought I'd see the day where I saw someone say "cis" on /.

      And get fucking upvoted as fucking insightful for it.

      Get your cute little unicorn-kin ass back to tumblr, pronto.

    64. Re: Pft by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Freedom of speech.

      Irrelevant in this context.

      The first amendment protects you and me from the government. It does not protect you and me from each other.

      If a private enterprise (DOTA2, Steam, Origin, whatever) wishes to curtail expression within their own domain, they're perfectly entitled to do so. There are valid exceptions to free-speech protections (e.g., restaurants can't refuse service based or race or sexual orientation of patrons) but none apply to the current discussion.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    65. Re:Pft by toejam13 · · Score: 2

      I did something like this back in the days when IRC was popular. I picked a female nickname and joined some generic chat channels. Immediately, I received a large number of private A/S/L messages from people. A couple of people started asking for pics via private message. A few others told me what state they were in and suggested that they'd be willing to travel if I lived in the vicinity. It got really weird very fast.

      Having said that, generic chat rooms like #teenchat and #friendly were the scum of the IRC. They seemed to pull in some really creepy people. There were tamer rooms where weirdos like that would get kickbanned fairly quick. But it sucks that people can't hang out in generic chat rooms without some guy offering up a photo of his junk. What the hell. Does that even work?

    66. Re: Pft by kwbauer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Awesome job proving his point!

    67. Re:Pft by puto · · Score: 2

      I agree with you. I am open to what every sexuality you are. Brianna Wu is a transexual. And while she might be a man in woman's body, she has no cause no reason to speak on a natural woman's harassment in the workplace. Because in reality the majority of the population sees her as a dude in a dress. She has never experienced life as a woman who looks like a woman, who has been harassed as a woman, and her taking up a womans cause is not noble, it is attention whoring.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    68. Re:Pft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the summary doesn't really make ________ clear.

      This should be the first post on EVERY /. article.

    69. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't get to decide what other people call themselves and we find "cis" to be very insulting. We wish to be referred to as "normal" thank you very much.

    70. Re:Pft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA? The very first case cited is arguably a felony:

      Later that day, someone texted me my address — telling me they’d "See me when I least expected it."

      This is waaaaaay beyond ITG.

    71. Re:Pft by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Which is nothing but a blight on software development. I mean, why is it that a bunch of supposedly well educated, knowledgeable people are so anti-social enough that they cannot raise their level of communication above an adolescent?

      I develop software, and about the most immature it gets is the sparingly placed curse (the f-bomb is even more rare). No one's calling in death threats, or trying to intimidate others. Emails, forums, etc., are all kept at a high level of professionalism, yet are still casual communications with developers sharing ideas, hints, and providing help. Don't know perl? Well, here's a perl script you can use, how it works so you can try implementing it in your favorite language.

      Those sort of messages on forums get deleted and banned purely as the entire audience is adult enough to be able to communicate clearly without resorting to childish attacks.

      Hell, I would expect it if gamers were mostly teenagers, but the average gamer is in the mid 30s and the age has been rising steadily. Or is there something about video games that can turn an adult into a blubbering 12 year old with maturity to match?

    72. Re:Pft by wardred · · Score: 2

      If you grab somebody by the neck - be you male or female grabbing a man or a woman - I'm pretty sure that the company is going to walk you out and ask you to wait to see if the aggrieved party is going to press charges. That's unacceptable behavior no matter who the perpetrator is.

    73. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... okay... tell me a non-western country where any of this PC horseshit is given credence?

      Show me a non-western country that is constantly obsessing about race, gender, etc and constantly struggling prove one group or the other is more of a victim then the other as they pathetically compete for grant money and public attention?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    74. Re:Pft by cowdung · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That doesn't make it more acceptable. It means men don't only have to change the way they treat women.. they also have to change the way they treat other men.

    75. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      NC requires victims have a vagina. I think sodomy used to fall under the obsolete "crime against nature" law though that was primarily for convicting homosexuals and was as likely to get a male victim convicted as his male attacker when actually enforced. Females using implements still didn't count as attackers of males under that one either, natch.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    76. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Yep. They just won't admit it, like so many things. See so much shit as a long time moderator of a dating site and getting roped into unpaid tech support. Chick brags about putting her ankles behind her head but bitches about a guy directly asking her about sex yet has multiple dick pic guys on a rotating booty call schedule. Offered me anal sex first time I spoke to her. Worst example, ignoring my personal abusers who were/are easily my vocal majority, but at least near a majority of chicks do shit like that at some point, usually on and off for at least a decade. Most reports of inappropriate messages I ever saw were from females that'd lost an argument they'd started and were just pissed about it. Sadly, it still counted against the guys.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    77. Re:Pft by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >I invite you to visit any developer's forum. Particularly for multiplayer games that get frequent patching.

      Yep.

      Calling them cesspools does a disservice to cesspools, which are a fine part of our public sanitation system.

    78. Re:Pft by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The first paragraph is written in a way that sounds like its disqus or reddit comments to that effect. And while its crude and mean, this is the internet, and if you learn nothing else from it its that you really need to not take it personally. People are jackasses on the internet, it has nothing to do with the world being sexist and everything to do with the general level of scumminess of your average anonymous troll.

    79. Re:Pft by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Melodramatic? Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when women are playing with men? I've heard guys who threatened to hunt down their female opponents so they could rape them and murder them just because they got their ass handed to them in a game. That is not juvenile "boys will be boys" behavior.

      Have you seen the average chat where girls ARENT present? People being obnoxious jerks is par for course-- to include rape threats on you, your mom, and your sister, requests that you Die In A Fire, threats to kill you in various ways, threats to DDOS you, etc.

      If you're getting upset by that and thinking its about you or your gender-- its not, and you have the blinders on if you think its about sexism.

    80. Re:Pft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Half the time I don't think they even read the summary.

      In all fairness, not reading the summary can only INCREASE your understanding of the article.

    81. Re:Pft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      The only "special" insult they make to women is rape

      Men get threatened with rape while playing/discussing video games all the time. It's one of the reasons I do not spend much time playing FPSs any more. Not because I was afraid of them making good on it, so much as I can think of dozens of things more fun to do than clicking buttons while some 14 year-old with his voice audibly cracking threatens to ram his genitals down my throat.

    82. Re:Pft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      and if he grabbed a man by the throat, what would've happened?

      If the victim reported it, same thing (in any workplace I've ever entered). OR ...

      what if she assaulted him?

      He probably wouldn't have reported it. Men don't usually report minor (in the sense of no visible physical injury) incidents of assault and battery unless they were looking for any ammunition they could use against someone (i.e. they really hate the attacker and want to get back at them).

      what then?

      Unreported crimes generally go unpunished. That doesn't make them stop being crimes.

    83. Re:Pft by jandersen · · Score: 2

      Being aggressive is always the first response a man comes up with when he feels insecure or under pressure. However, speaking as a man - that is, an adult, experienced man, not a not-quite-out-of-puberty boy - I think it is always wise to listen to criticism and try to understand it. Objectively, it does not harm you or make you vulnerable, if you are open to criticism; quite the opposite, in fact. If you are doing something wrong, then criticism is your chance to improve yourself and become better, and if the criticism is incorrect, then you can reject it, so no problem.

      And I disagree with your comment about 'nice ass' - unless you are complimenting somebody's donkey, this counts as an uninvited, sexual advance. Assuming that you are male and the only heterosexual in the office, just imagine receiving this sort of comment from just about every gay man around you. Even if you are not homophobic, would you like it? Probably not. This is about respect - you earn respect by showing respect, and you gain self-respect by earning respect from others.

    84. Re:Pft by Thraxy · · Score: 1

      + to that.

    85. Re:Pft by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I guess those incidents are also quickly swept under the rug, as it would be embarrassing for a man to admit being harassed by a woman.

    86. Re:Pft by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1
      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    87. Re:Pft by deek · · Score: 1

      You're talking about senator Jacqui Lambie. While it wasn't the brightest thing for her to say, she was obviously not serious about what she said. The worst you can accuse her of is a very poor sense of humour, not sexism.

    88. Re:Pft by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I have a guy who’s writing fan fiction starring me and him. It’s a pornographic fanfic, and he's on chapter 6. He anonymously submits chapters through my website"

      That's hardly unique to women. Richard Stallman once replied to someone who anonymously submitted a pornographic fanfic involving himself and Stallman. The reply was rather thorough in describing how unrealistic the fictional situation was. I'd look for the full text but I'm at work.

    89. Re:Pft by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      So if a Googler doesn't know perl. You'd say dumb Googler? Somehow that sounds more like a joke than an insult. I say it't the intent more than the word that counts. Woman isn't an insulting word and yet it can be used as an insult.

    90. Re:Pft by ketomax · · Score: 1

      I play DCUO and one of my league mates who is among the top players talks a lot of trash to players who don't play so well. His style of trash talking does not involve racism. Sometimes, we are on the receiving end as well. If anything, it is a bit funny and people who know him, don't really mind it. He did get a 3 days ban for calling another player "a retard" recently. But, he still goes on about it like nothing has happened.

    91. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You do realize how commonly women are raped and abused by men

      You do realize how commonly men are beaten and murdered, don't you?

      they might happen to be more sensitive to the implicit or explicit threats

      Oops, you're lowering the castle defenses now... Didn't you hear your sisters in arms giving you your marching orders? You're not supposed to admit that women are more sensitive to abuse... You're supposed to tow the party line, claiming that the only cause is evil men are being more verbally abusive to women.

      I'm tall, 182 centimeters, and I still once had a guy literally pick me up and carry me back to his apartment when I tried to walk away from him.

      Men are stronger than women, no question. Carrying a knife will even things out quite nicely, though. Clawing out eyes works pretty good, too.

      In the list of people who are treated special, can we exclude female body builders and throw in any and all physically small or frail men? If physical abilities are the only determinant, we've gotta have a few categories, including the linebackers you mentioned. Female midgets must get the best treatment of all.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    92. Re:Pft by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Or do you mean jobs in real life? Because nobody says that in real life and keeps their jobs.

      Really? "In The Loop"/"The Thick of It" is just about a documentary of how some people speak in some offices, let alone the shop floor or out in the yard.

    93. Re:Pft by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I'm curious why you capitalized "black man" as you would a proper noun, but failed to properly capitalize Perl.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    94. Re:Pft by ruir · · Score: 1

      Shit, what neighbourhood do you live to have people show at your door with batS?

    95. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a bit of a difference in that one in every four women actually will be raped in their life, and a sizeable percent of those getting those threats already have been.

      Not "raped" but "sexually assaulted". Rape laws have gone awry to the point that damn near everything is just classified as a "sex crime" now, so even a technical issue like statutory rape comes with the same stigma as being a major pedophile, and you really can't even get real statistics on the actual numbers of violent rapes.

      But don't take my word for it... The same study that claims 1 in 5 women have been sexually assaulted, claims 1 in 7 MEN have been sexually assaulted, too.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    96. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 1, Informative

      1, to the GP: RAINN says that 1 in 6 women has been the victim of rape. That's different from "will be over the course of their life". That rate is guaranteed to be higher. 1 in 6 in the "have been" category would imply that 2/3rds of the average surveyed woman's rape risk is behind them to reach the 1 in 4 figure, which is not at all an unreasonable assumption.

      2. When you want to cite data, don't cite secondary sources. They tell you the name of the Bureau of Justice study, so let's actually read it. We immediately notice first off that annualized rate of rape for non-college students is 8 per 1000, not 6 per 1000, so they chose the lower figure. Being in college actually *reduces* a woman's rate of being raped. But let's just go with the lower figure. A rate of 6 per thousand over... oh, let's just say 50 years... is 1-(1-0.006)^50=26%. Now, we chose the lesser percentage (6 per 1000 instead of 8 per 1000), and the average woman lives a lot longer than 50 years, but we're again assuming a higher rate of rape in the younger years counters this. In no way does the cited data argue against the fact that one in four women will be raped over the course of their lifetime.

      3. I don't know what "Ali's study" is or who Ali is, but it's irrelevant given the above. However, I will point out (and shouldn't have to) that it *is* illegal to have sex with someone who is visibly intoxicated to the point that they cannot make a reasonable decision. I'm not going to dig up the laws on all 50 states for you, but just to pick the largest state, here's California's statute. If the person is slurring their speech and can hardly walk, they're not cogent enough to consent to anything. You can't give *any* legal consent in such a situation. You can't sign over your house, you can't transfer ownership of your car, etc. And that's a damned good thing.

      Note that this only applies to cases where the person has drank so much that they are visibly impaired to the point that they can no longer make reasonable judgements. As always with such cases, the courts apply a "reasonable person" standard - they're impaired suchly if a "reasonable person" objectively looking at the situation would judge their decision-making abilities as being that impaired. Being "a little tipsy" or "buzzed" does not meet this standard.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    97. Re:Pft by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean as in:

      Scenario 1:

      Woman: "I'd like to fuck your brains out".
      Society: "Isn't she forward... a bit of a whore, eh?"

      Scenario 2:

      Man: "I'd like to fuck your brains out".
      Society: "Men... penile brain override activated."

      Like that?

      How's about we take these things with a bit of humor. Nobody who counts actually believes these stereotypes. Sure, even I am surprised to see a skilled IT pro that is female, because they're so rare, but that doesn't mean I expect women to be unable to be just that.

      Can't we just stop being sensitive ballsacks about every little bit of political incorrectness?

    98. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 1

      Do you people get your information from a game of telephone or something? Seriously, double check things before you post.

      Texas's rape law The basics?

      22.011. SEXUAL ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:
      (1) intentionally or knowingly:
      (A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent;
      (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person's consent; or
      (C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor;

      No exceptions for gender.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    99. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I no longer give a shit.

      I have always been concerned with the success and respect of women in technology and geekdom and have financially supported many causes for inclusivity of women, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender, intersex, asexual, two spirited and so on.

      Then, earlier this month, a popular card game designer was accused of rape by an anonymous person on an anonymous tumblr blog. Huge sites like kkotaku and rock paper shotgun wrote devastating articLs capitaliznf on the accusation and flT out calling hi a rapist (after all, most rape reports are real, therefore, he did it -- the actual statement by one article's author).

      The accusation was that he raped her, ten years ago, when he was a teenager, in college. His response was that he did know this person and had never had any sexual relation with them, much less any forced or unwanted one. The accuser said she did not believe he was a risk of ever offending again and therefore did nit and will not press charges.

      But she had no problem, under her own anonymity, naming /him/. Utterly ruining his life forever. Why did reading about that event stop me from ever supporting any of these issues or giving a shit ever again? Because the accused is. Sld described feminist who put his money don to support inclusive causes, hire women for his company, and even pay for transgender and queer and feminist game developers to attend game conferences like GaymerX and put them up in hotels. For years, his actual known actions demonstrated support of all these important things. If guilty of the accusation, then that is horrible, and I am sorry for the accuser. However, I can't give any credence to a mere accusation... By an anonymous person... Who mentioned it a decade later... And won't report it... But instead, people immediately judged him on the anonymous rumor on the Internet that is big proven.

      A great number of pieces were written in the last two weeks by the very people he used to support. They attacked him for defending himself. They attacked hi for spending time in his blog post about this mentioning his innocence instead if using this chance where his entire life is being destroyed to "have a meaningful conversation about consent".

      In fact, one of the very people he paid for room and board to a GaymerX conference for devs the,week this aired gave him absolutely o benefit of the doubt. Instead of considering his real proven actions against the rumored action of his lasted from an anonymous source, this transgendered person chose to say they were disgusted to have accepted his help in them getting to the conference and paying their way. Most flat out said that you MUST always believe the accuser. Period. And that he is guilty. And the. Went in lengthy diatribes,

      They even used his support of feminist causes as judgement against him. Why, he was clearly a rapist who grossly used the language ofmrape culture and feminism to shrug off judgement for raping.some even said maybe he did not know he faped the girl. Or that SHE may not even have known she was raped for the longest time. Sometimes, neither person involved I a rape, apparently, knows that one occurred.

      This is disgusting. As long as men are under the career and reputation ending threat from an anonymous rumor at any time and immediate and unforgiving judgement to guilt --- and turning against someone who supported your cause with ZERO benefit of the doubt considering the good they've done for you... Then I can not, as a man, support you. O do so is to support a kd set and a culture I. Which me. Have to live under a constant life changing threat, should we shu. Advances of the wrong person or offend the wrong person, or,just otherwise become the target of an unstable person who is willing to ruin your life, without giving you the benefit if a legal accusation so that you can at least have your day in court (not that it changes public assumption of gout the rest of your life, though).

      So...tough shit. I do t give a fuckabout your problems in the work place anymore. Or anywhere else.

    100. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem amazingly defensive. You're willing, in terms of equality, to have stalkers keep sending you death threats months after your original blog posting, you're ok with getting threatened with rape at conferences or having the sweaty nerd press up against you until you acknowledge his presence?

      I have never worked at a place that tolerated any sort of abuse in the work place. So equality means no harassing females and claiming it's just guys exercising their masculinity and natural desires, because I've never worked anywhere that tolerated males harassing males, trash talking males, insulting males in any manner. The trash talking defense is misguided because that just does not happen in a professional workplace.

      Men do NOT have to toughen up in the work place, because we're not insulted at the workplace for being men. No one tells us to go back to the kitchen. And for sure no one tells a black man to get back to the fields at work if they don't want to be fired on the spot.

      And learn what equality is. Because you seem to think that equality means that everyone should act exactly as you do.

    101. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 2

      Again, another case of "info I heard from some guy that made me mad so I'm repeating it here".

      North Carolina's rape law The basics? North Carolina does indeed consider only vaginal sexual assault "rape" (first degree or second degree), but immediately below that they list the crime of "sexual assault" (again, first degree or second degree), which covers everything else and has the exact same penalties. So it's just a state legal terminology issue and has no practical consequences.

      These things take 10 seconds to look up, is that really that onerous to do before pushing a "women are a bunch of coddled whiners when it comes to rape and men are the real victims" attitude on public forums?

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    102. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 2

      Oh, and for this?

      Females using implements still didn't count as attackers of males under that one either, natch

      May I direct you to:

      14-27.5. Second-degree sexual offense.
      (a) A person is guilty of a sexual offense in the second degree if the person engages in a sexual act with another person:
      (1) By force and against the will of the other person; or
      (2) Who is mentally disabled, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless, and the person performing the act knows or should reasonably know that the other person is mentally disabled, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless.

      and

      Sexual act also means the penetration, however slight, by any object into the genital or anal opening of another person's body: provided, that it shall be an affirmative defense that the penetration was for accepted medical purposes.

      Oh, gee, but some guy gave some "bitches, they got it easy about rape" rant and you believed him.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    103. Re:Pft by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      If a male politician said the same thing in jest, he would be labelled as sexist scum, and his career would be more or less over. When a women does says it in jest, it is taken in that spirit. That difference is sexist.

    104. Re:Pft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I had something similar happen when I ran an online game a long time ago. I created an alternate incognito character so I could just hang around and observe stuff. So I made a female character. Suddenly it was obvious I was treated differently. People followed me, gave me stuff, etc. No major insults, since our game tolerated none of that at any time (it was run by adults, not not by kids in adult bodies). It really got creepy. And the only thing female about it was the name, as it was a text-only game. I noticed over the years that any time I had a female character in a game that it was treated differently, being told "you're cute" or "why'd you make your character so ugly?".

      I noticed this in one of my male friends too (who is just too flirty at times). In a game he'll be really chatty with any female character but mostly ignore the male characters. At one time the first thing he asked a female character who joined our group what her story was. She asked what he meant, and he said "you know, like are you a student, where are you from, that sort of thing". She sort of deflected it, but it was odd that he never did that sort of thing to anyone but female characters. I mentioned to him that it seemed really creepy to me, and he was very defensive saying "I was just trying to be nice". It's like he was treating the game as his dating pool or something.

    105. Re:Pft by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      In many societies throughout history, women have (and still are) considered second citizens. It wasn't that long ago that in western culture women should be at home, and should obedient and timid creatures that serviced their husband and children no matter how their husband treated them.

      Is it so hard to see that when women try to that stereotypical role that many men will have feeling about it? Most often those feelings are fear which the men show as hate.

      So no it's not something which can be blamed on women "sticking out", it's because they are women that they get more "hate" than other groups.

      And saying that everybody does it to everyone is a bad excuse, especially when it happens more to women than to men.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    106. Re:Pft by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of being told both that women are 'equals' while also being told that I'm responsible for their emotional well being. Either women are adults or they are children. They need to decide which way they want to be treated.

      Yes. Lets ask children if they want to be treated like adults, and trust them to act like adults if they answer in the affirmative.

      Or, maybe that's a cop out, and we should start acting like men.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    107. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/sexual-assault-victims

    108. Re:Pft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If he did the same to a man he'd be walked out the door too. No reasonable company would ever tolerate that activity. They may not want lawsuits, but they also don't want the police to visit, they don't want the lawsuit from the victim either, and they absolutely do not want someone violent in the work place.

    109. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

      The number is utterly bogus:

      http://aspiringeconomist.com/i...

      And a woman's actual lifetime chance of being raped, is more like 8%:

      http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    110. Re:Pft by Rei · · Score: 1

      I found the cited article (always with the indirect sources...) ("No Penis, No Problem"), but I'm having trouble tracking down some of their data for further analysis.

      For example, I found the CIUS data on rates of arrest for various sex crimes, and the numbers match, but they don't define non-rape "sex offenses except forceable rape and prostitution" anywhere that I can locate. Given that indecent exposure, for example, is usually classified as a sex offense excluding forcible rape and prostitution, that kind of matters.

      I tried to track down that "large survey of college-age women" (cite 111), but the citation is just to a book which isn't available online (at least not the relevant part). I cross-checked the author's name and the claimed data and found no peer-reviewed publications about it.

      The cite for 112 is the same as for 111.

      The cite for 116 is interesting because most of the results I find when I search for it are criticizing the authors for using bad methodology to support a "satanism scare", that nursery school teachers are ritually sexually molesting children for satanic purposes. It was only focusing on cases supposedly connected to satanism, and was alleging that there's a widespread problem with women running day care centers hold satanic parties with the whole staff taking part in mass sex abuse. Needless to say, this was another book, not a peer-reviewed paper.

      The cite for 117 is the same as for 111.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    111. Re:Pft by durrr · · Score: 1

      It's not actually work related. It's about their opinions.

      The author of the article isn't getting shit because she's a lead developer, she's getting shit because she writes articles on gender equality in gaming. Her example persons are also having some female-centric activities.

      If I write a gaming opinion piece called "Mens world: why game devs should ignore all whining women and focus on their main demographic" I'd also get a lot of angry mail and spiteful messages. If I write a followup article after such hatemail called "Ruling elite: how a small minority of females with an interest in games try to hijack the industry and suppress dissident opinon" I'd get even more shit heaped onto me.

      Is this a sign that I'm harassed because my gender? Is it a sign that the gaming demographic is full of bad persons? Or is it a sign that inflammatory opinion pieces will always result in hatemail?

    112. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      I referenced how the crime against nature law was used in the past. I'd say you're reading comprehension needs work, but you're just a femitroll, so it doesn't matter.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    113. Re:Pft by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Poe or actual moron?

      I'm betting actual moron.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    114. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and RAPE stats always include all "sexual assault"? Notice it only specifies penetration. Much like the UK, being "forced to penetrate" isn't classified as criminal "penetration" as per "sexual act" merely "sexual contact" which is just "sexual battery". The CDC didn't class "forced to penetrate" as not rape for a reason, You pretentious, deluded little shit-stain.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    115. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      They're not even close to the same frequency.

      Yes, but that cotnradicts the worldview of a number of people here who insist that sexism simply doesn't exist.

      Men get death threats, women get death threats so no sexism.

      Please don't muddy the waters with facts.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    116. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So, it would appear that you're basically a nutcase. Instead of trying to counter the very good points, you come out with this little gem:

      Oops, you're lowering the castle defenses now... Didn't you hear your sisters in arms giving you your marching orders? You're not supposed to admit that women are more sensitive to abuse... You're supposed to tow the party line, claiming that the only cause is evil men are being more verbally abusive to women.

      So you have some perverse idea of what feminism is meant to be, and which you strongly dislike and then attack the poster to not sticking to the thing that you (a) hate and (b) is your own invention in the first place.

      Men are stronger than women, no question. Carrying a knife will even things out quite nicely, though.

      It might, if you can get to it. I carry round a pocket knife because I'm an engineer and I like keeping tools on me. If someone the size of Hulk Hogan or whatever attacked me, my teeny little knife might help, or it might just serve to enrage the guy.

      Clawing out eyes works pretty good, too.

      Oh problem solved! Rape never happens. Good, we can close the thread and move on.

      Female midgets must get the best treatment of all.

      You're insane.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    117. Re:Pft by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      In the workplace if a man even smiles funny at a women he's walked out the door. The same man threatens violence against another man and it's treated as a joke.

      No idea what kind of hell hole you work in, but around here if you threaten violence against a co-worker you are at minimum suspended and possibly even immediately fired.

      And this is in France, where it is famously very hard to fire someone.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    118. Re:Pft by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Why? It is funny. You have to laugh or you'd puke.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    119. Re:Pft by N1AK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I write a gaming opinion piece called "Mens world: why game devs should ignore all whining women and focus on their main demographic" I'd also get a lot of angry mail and spiteful messages.

      And Martin Luther King got a whole lot of shit for highlighting the plight of black people; it doesn't mean he didn't have a point or that threatening to sexually assault or kill him should be brushed off as the inevitable consequence of his actions.

      I've seen enough sexist, aggressive or verbal, abuse of women by men which had nothing to do with the woman being a 'feminist' (like that could justify it regardless) to appreciate that sexism is an real issue that needs addressing. Obviously not everything that every man does is sexist, but when women have to put up with orders of magnitude more harrassment just because they're female, us men need to put aside our desire to defend our own reputation and realise that this shit has to stop.

    120. Re:Pft by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Yes. Lets ask children if they want to be treated like adults, and trust them to act like adults if they answer in the affirmative.

      Actually, there's nothing wrong with that idea.
      I've known 17-year-old "children" who were more "adult" than some 40-50-year-old adults I knew at the time.

      And we DO practice it.
      Only, it's mostly archaic, traditional and uni-directional OR it is a matter arising from legal dispute.
      Instead of being something like a social and legal contract that you can both accept and sign and be treated by the society as an adult.
      And have those rights taken away or suspended without going through something like being sent to jail.

      I'm guessing that the problem is that we'd need some kind of a test... and it's no longer enough just to be able to kill a buffalo or read from a book.
      So... we just keep assuming that eventually all people simply become adults on their 18th birthday or whenever.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    121. Re:Pft by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Or vanish back to the imagination that created. The simplest way for 9/10 men who don't think there's an issue to get a better understanding of the difference in harassment between genders is to think about how much abuse (if any) they get for being male, then ask a female friend to tell them about examples of harrasment they have been subjected to and the effect.

      Anecdotals have plenty of flaws but with something as inherently personal as sexual harrasment it's a lot easier to appreciate the importance if you realise the universality of it and the impact on a real person.

    122. Re:Pft by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Actually, that sounds EXACTLY like an internet tough guy, hiding behind perceived immunity of the internet, throwing threats and insults.

      To which one should respond in kind and/or worse, ignore them, report them to the admins/authority, post a video of themselves shooting at a target or post an address of one's lawyer.
      Sure... all those responses require some action and further responsibility for those actions, but so does any other way or form of protecting one's existence or rights.

      I mean... Police can't be watching only one person all the time, checking if someone has made any threats or tried to hurt them.
      It's very hard to do that for people who are heads of states.
      SOME action (and responsibility for those actions) on one's part IS required.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    123. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      You pretentious, deluded little shit-stain.

      I was unconvinced by your arguments until this point. Now you have won me over.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    124. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So your response to these people pretending to be women getting harassed is to bring one extreme example and then generalise.

      Most reports of inappropriate messages I ever saw were from females that'd lost an argument they'd started and were just pissed about it.

      And this is from the guy (I assume) who lost an argument in this very thread and responded by calling the winner a "pretentious little shit stain".

      I believe that irony is lost on you.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    125. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      That must be embarrassing since that part wasn't the argument. Might want to look up red herring, if want to learn logic someday. It's not actually a fish...

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    126. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh, geeze, don't let a feminist hear you say that! Every time someone suggests women maybe aren't suitable to being firefighters or combat soldiers, the wymins go apeshit.

      So... in order to be a soldier or firefighter, you need to be built like an NFL linebacker? That's news to me. In fact for soldiers one would expect long endurance would be a plus. Ultrarunning is something where men and women appear to compete on a somewhat even footing.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    127. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      That must be embarrassing since that part wasn't the argument.

      It's a classic example of Ad-Hom. Trying to pretend it was not an Ad-Hom and was merely tacked on the end with no relevance to the argument you were utterly failing to make is another logical fallacy: lying through your teeth.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    128. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      That I lost by being right? Yeah, that's not irony. That's idiocy.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    129. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      You made it quite clear you were ignoring any point I actually made. I don't have to debunk you when you do it yourself.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    130. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. TFA has countless examples of rape and death threats. Someone even posted one woman's address in this threat. How many men, or even black man or gay men get threats like that?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    131. Re:Pft by martas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His point is that they're not fuckwads because they're "sexist, racist, homopobic, tranphobic", but that they're "sexist, racist, homopobic, tranphobic" because they're fuckwads. Also, I think it's pretty funny that in the list of "teh patriarchy" adjectives, "cis" has become so standard despite referring to about 0.3% of the population. I guess the more victim classes you have, the stronger your case sounds. In which case, here are some other classes you could have used, thank me later: mentally ill, physically ill, young, old, bald, poorly endowed in the genital area, ugly, pretty, skinny, fat, redhead, bucktoothed, swole, hairy, flat-chested, less-than-fluent in the language being used, cross-eyed, far or near sighted, and virgin. And that's just off the top of my head, I'm sure I could come up with more.

    132. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      That I lost by being right?

      No matter how much invective you hurl, calling someone a "deluded little shitstain" does not make you right.

      That's idiocy.

      Quite so.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    133. Re:Pft by ybanrab · · Score: 1

      The 1 in 4 statistic is completely debunked, it comes from a survey which included having sex whilst drunk as rape.

      http://youtu.be/FKgrYVtYSCk

    134. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll bet that the anecdotes depicted in this article were actually subjected to scenario 1, and took it personally instead of constructively.

      How do you take an email saying "Women are the niggers of gender. If you killed yourself, I wouldnâ(TM)t even fuck the corpse" constructively? How do you take people threatening to come to your house, complete with your home address, constructively? Why do so many of these kind people post their constructive criticism anonymously?

      A few men do something, and now suddenly we need pervasive, invasive, due process rights destroying changes to the law, making it toxic for ALL men.

      Bad laws are a problem in themselves, not a gender issue. Having said that I find that they are generally well balanced and fair in my country, and apply equally to both genders. I have benefited from them, and I'm male (e.g. I now get the same relaxed dress code as women do).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    135. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Which is why the "invective" wasn't the fucking argument. Again, embarrassing. Might want to get back to learning logic since sophistry's clearly addled your cognitive faculties, whether intentional or not.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    136. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      People keep asking for equality AND special treatment.

      Can you say specifically what special treatment the author of the article is asking for? I don't get the impression that she thinks only women should be excluded from death and rape threats, which include details like their home address, and which continue for months and even years after one article was published.

      Your misunderstanding is pretty common, unfortunately. She isn't saying that women should have special treatment, she is saying that men generally don't have to put up with this stuff and women shouldn't have to either (i.e. equality). To be absolutely clear, if it was white men being routinely threatened with rape and murder just for doing their job it would still be a problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    137. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You made it quite clear you were ignoring any point I actually made. I don't have to debunk you when you do it yourself.

      Your point was not good. I then focussed on the rather hilariously poor use of ad-hom. For some reason you're squirming around trying to deflect that you resorted to insults over logic.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    138. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't get a lot of women being told they're neckbearded losers living in their momma's basements because they have micropenises, either.

      No, they get told they are ugly, nerdy, flat chested and unable to get a boyfriend. Different words, same bullshit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    139. Re:Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scenario 2 is basically what feminists are doing to men. A few men do something, and now suddenly we need pervasive, invasive, due process rights destroying changes to the law, making it toxic for ALL men. We're also supposed to accept the denigration of masculinity in all aspects of culture and life as some kind of penance. Those who question it are labeled misogynists.

      "A few men" apparently depends on one's perspective. I really don't see this as much different from race relations in the 1960s - you had a bunch of old, white people socialized with casual racism, such that they didn't even think about words like "nigger," but you also had a bunch of younger people of all races, upset by institutionalized racism. The cries of rampant racism then and sexism now are to raise awareness, and to make each of us think about the way we interact with groups of "other."

      Think of it this way: if you're male, you're embedded in a male social group. Most of the interactions you see are male-male, with only occasional male-female interactions, and those generally with women having little power. It may seem "right" to treat those females just like one of the guys. You have a small sample size from which to judge male-female interactions. If you're female, embedded in a female social group, you have relatively few interactions with men, most of whom have more power. It's a small sample size from which to judge male-female interactions, and the negative or oppressive ones are going to stand out. If you're a member of the public, embedded in a civilian population, you have few interactions with police, most of whom have more power. You have a small sample size from which to judge police-public interactions, and negative or oppressive ones are going to stand out. And we're almost all happy to say cops are corrupt assholes, thugs with badges, etc, even though they are demonstrably no more corrupt than the general public.

      Every time some man acts like an ass to some woman, it counters 10 men being perfectly civil. If you don't like it, try to keep your bro's in line. It turns out they're assholes, and no one likes assholes.

    140. Re:Pft by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Force vaginal intercourse or fellatio ON a male isn't classified as "sexual assault" in NC, much less "rape". It's just a misdemeanor instead of a felony. Quite an issue. There's a similar situation in the UK and apparently Texas as per the poster I was originally replying to before your proudly ignorant sexists trolled in.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    141. Re:Pft by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      So violence against me, is ok because I weigh and extra 30lbs than you?

      Oh wait, that's right, it's my fault because I'm a man an should have fought back?

      Fuck you. Violence is wrong. Not violence against women, not violence against children... just plain violence, without any modifiers, is wrong.

    142. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What do you mean by 'social skills'? Some would say this means "you just need to know how to talk to women". Why doesn't this apply to women as well? The post itself mentions something about women having to 'talk nice' to men to be heard, and that it's oppressive. Sorry, but if it's good for the gander, then it's good for the goose.

      The difference is that when people talk about men knowing how to talk to women they mean knowing how not to be insulting, lecherous dicks showing them with unwanted attention... You know, talking to them like they talk to other guys they have no sexual interest in, i.e. normally.

      When people talk about women knowing how to talk to men they mean women knowing how to talk extremely passively so as not to upset some apparently quite delicate feelings. It's the exact thing that a lot of men complain about - women being overly sensitive. The point she is making is that actually some men are at least as bad, and feel insulted and threatened when a women offers constructive criticism.

      You can see it all over the comments on this article. A woman dares to suggest that some men are being arseholes when they made credible threats to rape and murder her, and suddenly all these guys get defensive and upset instead of just saying "yeah, maybe people shouldn't do that."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    143. Re:Pft by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Actually, men are expected to have thick skin, and work themselves to the bone with no complaint. We're supposed to be the "breadwinners" and go out and bring the cash back to a family.
      That means having to talk nice to others, take the hits, and bear with it. There is all kinds of abuse levelled at men in the workplace, but it's all socially acceptable, because it's considered a tough and hungry workplace.
      When you post on a prominent blog, guys get all kinds of threats too. Death being the usual one, threats to family, abuse of all kinds.. MAke the wrong sound on some, and poof, there goes your job.
      Now, it seems from this that women should have the right to post whatever they want, wherever they want, and have it all nice and fluffy. Honestly, yes, they should. But so should men. But nobody makes a big noise and says "men should be protected from this too". Now, if the article had said "people suffer abuse, and this should stop", I'd say hurrah, and be benind it. However, saying "women need these protections, and we honestly don't care about the men.. In fact, we blame it all on the men because they're the largest population in the segment" is horrendously sexist.

    144. Re:Pft by dwpro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I found nothing definitive, but here's what I gather (using US as baseline since we're talking American football):

      Women weight: 163 lbs Bench Press (untrained): 80 lbs Bench Press (novice): 90 lbs Men weight: 163 lbs Bench Press (untrained): 135 lbs Bench Press (novice): 175 lbs Linebacker weight: 245 lbs Bench Press: 370 lbs

      My results are inconclusive but my best guess is that linebackers are modestly larger and stronger ((26% & 111%) proportionally to average men, versus men to women (18% & 94%).

      Sources:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...
      http://www.exrx.net/Testing/We...
      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What...
      http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/...

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    145. Re:Pft by jittles · · Score: 1

      I had a girl when I was in my twenties, whom I told that I wasn't interested in her that way call me repeatedly and just breath into the phone when I answered.. that was creepy. Being a guy didn't make me feel better about it either, I didn't know if she would try to cut my brake lines in my car, or burn my house down with me in it. It sucked.

      All of the things mentioned in the article are truly lame, and should never happen to anyone , but I don't see them as sexist per se. It's more just about how shitty the world is.

      Oh yeah. Had an ex girlfriend do that in college. She called 5-10 times per day for 3 months. Then for the next 3 months after that I would randomly find her waiting for me at places I never expected to see her (but she knew I went to). She would be waiting outside of my place at 2am when I would get home from a night out (she had no car, she would walk 1 hour and then wait for me outside for as long as it took). It was 6 months of wondering if she was going to try and kill me.

    146. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      As a straight male, I've been called Noob, loser, moron, fag (though it doesn't apply), n*gga (though it doesn't apply), whatever.

      Go read TFA. Read the first few paragraphs evens. We are talking about rape and death threats, which included the author's home address. She goes on to show how that isn't an isolated incident.

      If it were just the usual 12 year old XBOX Live bullshit you would have a point, but this is people going far out of their way to gather information on their targets and make specific, violent threats that they are capable of carrying out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    147. Re:Pft by jittles · · Score: 1

      Melodramatic? Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when women are playing with men? I've heard guys who threatened to hunt down their female opponents so they could rape them and murder them just because they got their ass handed to them in a game. That is not juvenile "boys will be boys" behavior. That's somebody who might violently act out if the right circumstances (alcohol, drugs, peer pressure, stress, etc..) were to happen.

      That's just gaming. You should read some of the stories about women who get involved in politics. Some people get really unhinged when you attack their personal values. Then you have some guys who go completely off the deep end when it is a woman doing it. Threats of murder come quickly and often. It is sadistic and it is ugly.

      I still play some older COD games online with my brother. We're pretty good, and we make a great team. If we play on a Friday night there is a very high chance that someone will send us a private message with a death threat or other harassing language. I've heard it all. These people get pissed when they see two people on a 6 person team account for over half of winning score, assume we cheat, and go ballistic. I've got a friend who is much much better than both of us. When I play with him, that guy will get 70% of the points by himself. He gets a lot of hate.

    148. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      One of the threats contained her home address. That's what the police here call a "credible threat" and arrest people for.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    149. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah yes, the old "sometimes a white man gets shit so sexism and racism doesn't exist" argument. You do know that's an unsound argument, right?

      You do know that's not what the poster was saying at all, right? You do know that strawmaning is an unsound argument, right?

      You continually repeat that white men don't deal with these issues. Then when a white man comes out a says "well actually I do have to deal with those issues" you insult them and say they're implying racism/sexism doesn't exit.

      Congrats on exemplifying exactly why the parent poster is so fed up with you idiots.

    150. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      "Countless" would be the answer to your question.

    151. Re:Pft by Rukia · · Score: 1

      It's nice to start out a comment with a lot of assumptions about the person you're replying to. The way this is phrased says 'ad hominem' attack to me.

    152. Re:Pft by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Yet if I wanted to carry a cat back to my apartment against its will I'd be the one traumatized. Women behave more like naive kittens than the "survivors" they portray themselves as

    153. Re:Pft by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      You don't get a lot of men being asked If the carpet matches the drapes

      That's because more women dye the drapes than men.

    154. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      And men were supposed to go out and work themselves to death to pay for that woman to not have to do the same. They were expected to always put woman's health and well-being above their own (and still are according to this article). Stop being so myopic.

    155. Re:Pft by deek · · Score: 1

      Well, no, she is very much being labelled as sexist in the media because of those remarks. Not that I'm sympathetic to her, but the media have gone somewhat overboard with it.

      When you look at the whole conversation in context, it was obviously said flippantly. Had a male politician said the same thing, paraphrased appropriately, it would still be flippant, and in equally poor taste. I'm sure the media would also parade his comments in exactly the same way. No difference.

    156. Re:Pft by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point, the people that post those things will have something vile to say to who ever they target, and they don't just target "minorities", the straight cis white male will be called a faggot with a mother that the poster violates daily, there will be threats of violence ex "I'm going to bash in your faggity face in you stupid fuck". No one is immune.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    157. Re:Pft by Pope · · Score: 1

      and if he grabbed a man by the throat, what would've happened?

      The same thing? Why would anyone put up with physical assault by a superior in the workplace?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    158. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      If it happens to a man it's made up and we should ignore it. If it happens to a woman it's super important, not exaggerated, totally legit and we have to "realise the universality of it and the impact on a real person". Got it.

    159. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Which is why the "invective" wasn't the fucking argument

      And yet it has a logical fallacy named after it. It's called Ad-Hom.

      Might want to get back to learning logic since sophistry's clearly addled your cognitive faculties, whether intentional or not.

      You might want to learn to argue without resorting to locical fallacies such as Ad-Hom.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    160. Re:Pft by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Scenario 2: Woman: "What does that do? Sorry, I don't know perl." Crowd: "Geez, women are stupid."

      You forgot the rape comment...

    161. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Almost never happens to guys and happens "pretty much constantly" to girls. I guess I should just accept your bold assertion without any evidence? It is easy to make a problem look one sided when you completely ignore all but one side.

    162. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      His point is that they're not fuckwads because they're "sexist, racist, homopobic, tranphobic", but that they're "sexist, racist, homopobic, tranphobic" because they're fuckwads.

      A fine distinction but I'm not sure it matters.

      Also, I think it's pretty funny that in the list of "teh patriarchy" adjectives, "cis" has become so standard despite referring to about 0.3% of the population.

      "cis" refers to about 99.7% of the population. I put it in there for the sake of pedantry. The thing is a transgender man is likely to get a lot of shit as well.

      Read that list of adjectives as "statistically modal white man".

      I guess the more victim classes you have, the stronger your case sounds.

      Whatever. Put it in terms of disjunction if you whish.

      And that's just off the top of my head, I'm sure I could come up with more.

      I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    163. Re: Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Therein lies the point: they don't feel like they will be treated fairly for reporting it. Women are suspicious that going down to HR an making a stink will make them even greater outsiders, invite retribution, or erode good will they feel they must earn. All of that is borne out of that Rape Culture "blame the victim" undercurrent, to which women are very sensitive (for survival) and to which men are largely oblivious, having been privileged to never worry that their sex would make responding logically and responsibly to harassment might ultimately make their work environment so threatening, unwelcoming, or hostile they have no choice but to quit.

    164. Re:Pft by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This is a bit special. I love how you say this:

      You do know that's not what the poster was saying at all, right? You do know that strawmaning is an unsound argument, right?

      followed by this:

      You continually repeat that white men don't deal with these issues.

      I challenge you to find one post ever where I denied that white men don't deal with these issues.

      White men do. But the point about this article is that women get it much, much more.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    165. Re:Pft by Pro923 · · Score: 1

      I think it's a lot to do with how you react to a sexual violation that can make 'rape' a more subjective thing than it ought to be, given the severity of the accusation and punishment. About 20 years ago, when I was in my early 20s (male) - I was at a company Christmas party, drank lots and passed out in my hotel room in which a lot of other guests happened to be hanging around in. The biggest, fattest, most aggressive sales girl of the company allegedly (I was told the story eventually later) wouldn't leave me alone, eventually was able to wake me into a sleep-walk like state and take me to her room and proceeded to have sex with me. In the morning I didn't have any recollection of what had happened. The next day of work, the jokes ensued - co-workers would randomly connect my calls to her phone and stuff like that... I generally laughed it off, though it was humiliating. If the roles were reversed, I suppose that could have easily been a rape case. As a male, I saw it more as just something to be embarrassed about.

    166. Re:Pft by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      And so the police were duly called and the individual in question was arrested, right? Women aren't "commonly raped and abused by men" and neither are they beleaguered victims of a relentless onslaught of rapey abuse on the internet, at least no more so than anyone else. I've had lunatics tell me they were going to rape my mother in front of me - end result, they got banned like the losers they were and I never thought about them again, until now at least.

      There's a new thing going on, you should check it out, it's called #womenagainstfeminism. Lot of interesting messages for the aspiring rape hysteria peddler on there.

    167. Re:Pft by operagost · · Score: 1

      "Nice ass" is more than enough to get one fired in today's misandrist society.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    168. Re:Pft by Kelbear · · Score: 2

      This is a pretty key mistake in the summary.

      This article is not about harassment of women in the game industry. It's about harassment of women when they go on the internet.

      Gaming isn't even relevant to the article or the issue. On the internet there are people will want to hurt you with whatever information they can get about you. Show that you're _____, you're going to get insulted for _____. Go on the internet, show that you're black, you're going to get called a nigger. Go on the internet, show that you're female, state an opinion, you're going to get called a cunt. Show that you're anything but a medium-built, white male, you're going to get called something unpleasant relating to those differences. If you ARE a medium-built white male, you'll still get called unpleasant things, but they won't be related to your differences because you're considered normal in at least that regard. Bottom Line: the more you get noticed, the more disgusting messages you'll get. If you decide gaming is the source of this problem, you'd be missing the root cause: People are shitty when they're anonymous. I sure wish people weren't like that, but changing the primal behavior of humankind when they're freed from consequence is what we're really talking about here. Not gamers being somehow better or worse than any other constituents of the internet.

      I thought the article might have been interesting if it was exposing some unusual treatment they get in person when they're working at their job in the games industry. Instead, it's about them going on the internet making public statements and being upset at the shitty people on the internet. It's sad, but it's also not a surprise, and the conclusions drawn in the article are woefully misplaced.

    169. Re:Pft by operagost · · Score: 1

      What's a "cis"? Sounds like a codeword of the intolerant to me.

      You're part of the problem.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    170. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      An ad-hom fallacy is attacking someone's character to disprove their argument. For example: "serviscope_minor is an idiot and doesn't understand what logical fallacies are and therefore everything they say can be considered stupid and wrong".

      You are trying to commit a fallacy fallacy (asserting someone committed a fallacy so their argument can be ignored). But you seem to have no idea what a fallacy is (lying isn't a fallacy by the way) and ended up just committing one yourself.

    171. Re:Pft by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, they're swept under the run because it's simply impossible for a woman to be sexist.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    172. Re:Pft by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Get a playstation. We have less of the vocal retarded 12 year old retards.

      I don't know about that, it would be nice if it was true, but I don't think it is. And I'm saying that as a PlayStation fan.

    173. Re:Pft by AnOnyxMouseCoward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this, loving the stats.

      What I find really interesting is that the difference is so large between men and women, _for the same weight_. When I see a linebacker, I know he's stronger. As a man in a crowd of a mix of men and women, some taller/larger and some smaller/skinnier than me, I don't really feel threatened. However getting the stats, if I were a woman and knew that every single male my size is almost twice as strong as me, and even the ones shorter than me are probably stronger... yea that would be scarier. I can only imagine if everyone is 6'3 and the size of a linebacker, and yep, threats become much more threatening.

    174. Re: Pft by phishen · · Score: 1

      The first amendment protects you and me from the government. It does not protect you and me from each other.

      I love the way you said this

    175. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      people need to understand making a racist comment or joke != being racist. Making a joke deemed sexist also != being a sexist.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    176. Re:Pft by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      looks like she's had FFS, Osterhaut by the looks of it, so her passibility is high. The voice being the thing that "might" get her clocked as an MTF.

      But to most non-trans, she'd just be a tall woman with a laptop. Besides, most MTF's have identified with women and women's issues long before they ever transitioned. And if she transitioned young, she would have experienced life as a woman, and even if she didn't transition young, she would be having the experiences "now"

    177. Re:Pft by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      ...moron, fag (though it doesn't apply), n*gga (though it doesn't apply)...

      It's interesting that most if not all serious insults are about minority status. You insult a straight man by calling him non-straight, but a homosexual by calling them homosexual.

      That alone should tell us that the identities not turned into serious insults are above those that are.

    178. Re:Pft by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Do you think that because the average gamer is in the mid 30s that there are no vocal minority of immature, blubbering 12 year olds or those who act like them? Extremists and idiots always make more noise. And they either don't know or don't care (quite often both) if the majority doesn't share their opinions - if they did, we wouldn't be talking about them, would we? That's exactly WHY they do what they do.

    179. Re:Pft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      You realize that there's more difference between your average man and your average woman than between your average NFL linebacker and your average man, right? (seriously, compare the stats some time - height, average bench strength, etc).

      This is almost certainly wrong, by the way.

      Have you ever watched draft combine footage? Those linebackers do 20 or even 30 reps of 225 lbs like it's nothing. Some linemen have a one rep max of 500 or 600 lbs. 400 lbs is common.

      I don't know what the average man and woman can bench, but NFL linemen are insanely strong. One could easily pick me up and throw me across the room like a ragdoll. I could not do the same with my wife. I could pick her up and put her over my shoulder or something, but there is just no comparison to an NFL lineman.

      I understand well that men are stronger than women on average. No dispute there. I just think that a lot of people don't realize just how insanely strong NFL linemen are. This is a huge part of why football is so dangerous.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    180. Re:Pft by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      Men NEVER say die, you fucking cunt! to other men, ever.

    181. Re:Pft by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 2

      People pick on whatever sticks out. Is the developer Russian? Russian insults. Are they of Chinese descent, and he comments?

      Sure, but the problem isn't that, but what commonly sticks out and how it's insulted.

      Being white usually doesn't stick out. Being non-white does. "Whitey" and "cracker" are almost comical in comparison with other racial slurs.

      Being a straight man usually doesn't stick out. If someone still wants to insult a straight man, they usually do it by comparing them to women or to homosexuals.

      People use ethnicity according to their prejudices as insults, but you rarely hear "Swedish" as an insult (except maybe on Fox News). So that's very selective. You also see mental illnesses and mental capabilities used as insults. Disabilities as well. Class is also often used ("redneck" isn't just aimed at whites, but poor, uncultured whites).

      Some groups are way more targeted than others. If you look at which groups are targeted and which ones are not, you should see a clear pattern.

    182. Re:Pft by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      "cis"? "cis"? What? You mean "male" or "female" not fucking "cisgender" you complete prick.

      Give me fucking strength.

    183. Re:Pft by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Dear god, that was beautiful.

    184. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      /golfclap

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    185. Re:Pft by russotto · · Score: 1

      Every time some man acts like an ass to some woman, it counters 10 men being perfectly civil. If you don't like it, try to keep your bro's in line. It turns out they're assholes, and no one likes assholes.

      It turns out I neither have power, authority, or even influence over those "bros". So, you can take your collective guilt elsewhere; I'm not buying.

    186. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Not all sexual assaults are rape. Way to move the goalposts. You work for the FBI?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    187. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      We all know prison rapes don't count. After all, only evil people are in prison to begin with.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    188. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Feminist hypocrites? First time for everything I suppose.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    189. Re:Pft by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      Do you really think it's unreasonable to ask for a source when a statistic is quoted? If you're not prepared to back up a claim of fact you shouldn't make it.

    190. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the special treatment IMO is that its ok to generalize one group of people, the white male, but no other group

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    191. Re:Pft by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The "point" of this one (and I'm being magnanimous there) is the anecdotal, emotive propaganda of a professional victim. A prime candidate for being "derailed."

    192. Re:Pft by werepants · · Score: 1

      Have you ever actually tried to examine your own biases? Because it sure sounds like you are refusing to admit the possibility that they exist.

      I used to hold an attitude very much like yours, but I took some tests on this site: https://implicit.harvard.edu/i...

      It's a very fair and objective measurement of your basic, gut reactions to things. I always assumed that I held no bias against black people - that turned out to be mostly true. I also felt like I had no bias against women in science/tech. Turned out that I was pretty wrong.

      The fact is, things are not currently equal between men and women. Women are physically weaker, it's a simple fact, which means that they live in a constant state of heightened awareness compared to men. When was the last time you asked another guy to walk with you out to your car at night? Women are acutely aware of that physical power imbalance and rearrange their lives to try to avoid vulnerable situations. And we as a culture are perfectly fine with that and expect them to accommodate this violent reality - any time there's a rape story people instantly ask if she was dressed provocatively, or drinking, or in the wrong part of town, etc. It doesn't really matter where the hell I am, or how much I drink, or who I'm with, I'm pretty much never worried that I'm going to get in a compromising situation and get raped for it.

      Have you ever had to work in a department where everybody else is a woman? Take that environment, where even if people aren't purposely excluding you they regularly talk about periods and tampons and things that you are fundamentally unable to relate to. Now imagine that every single one of those co-workers is physically more powerful than you are - whether that coworker is confrontational or not. Oh, and your supervisor, their supervisor, and on and on up to the top are all not your gender. On top of it, make it so that everywhere else in the industry is the same way, any person answering a topic online, most of the authorities in the field - 90%+ are the opposite gender to you. An unknown but nonzero percentage of those people believe you to be inferior immediately, regardless of your performance. To top it off make sure to embed lots of industry humor and institutional inertia that is subtly or not-so-subtly catered to people of the opposite sex (does that get your panties in a twist? Man up).

      Things are not fucking equal, and your diatribe demonstrates that you either have put very little thought into how the experience of others might differ from your own, or you are willfully ignorant. If you opened your eyes, you'd see that being a straight white male confers way more advantages than any other demographic enjoys and means that you honestly never have to think about a huge swath of problems that are daily realities for everybody else. Pretending that bias doesn't exist doesn't make it so. Women aren't really asking for much - just the ability to participate in an industry on equal terms, and since things are ALREADY INEQUAL, an extra level of protection wouldn't be unreasonable. But to be fair, that little bit of hasty generalization is entirely unjust, how dare they speculate about our motivations and privilege...

    193. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      RAINN's "1 in 6" stat's reference defines rape as:

      Rape was defined as an event that occurred without the victim’s consent, that involved the use or threat of force to penetrate the victim’s vagina or anus by penis, tongue, fingers, or object, or the victim’s mouth by penis.

      It is exactly this completely biased "survey" method that make people conclude these groups have an ideology to push. The methodology in all of these surveys that show high numbers is always pretty poor and clearly biased. This is as close to "only men can rape" as they could get without explicitly stating "only men can rape".

    194. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're a member of the wrong gaming communities

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    195. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Isn't "straight cis" redundant? At least for Slashdot's general target demographic, U.S. readers.

      (cue people screaming about how the general Slashdot readership somehow isn't American and I should DIAF)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    196. Re:Pft by chispito · · Score: 1

      Shit, what neighbourhood do you live to have people show at your door with batS?

      Seconded. I've never had any of the stuff he describes happen to me. Either he lives in a post apocalyptic dystopia or he's not very discreet at school/work/play.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    197. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously holding up other countries where minorities are actively oppressed as a positive example?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    198. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      blame the victim i see. once again we prove that people dont want equality they want white men to be submissive

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    199. Re: Pft by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      In my experience men generally don't like to take criticism constructive or otherwise. Whether or not it comes from a woman.

    200. Re:Pft by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Grammar pedantry usually adds nothing to a conversation, but there should be a special "-1 Irregardless" moderation.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    201. Re:Pft by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when women are playing with men?

      Have you ever listened to the audio chats of FPS co-op games when men are playing with men? I've heard straight guys who threatened to hunt down their male opponents so they could rape them and murder them just because they got their ass handed to them in a game. The usual response is to laugh, then shoot faster.

    202. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      For awhile there, every time I read a summary I assumed that the editor/submitter was lying to me somehow and just had to figure out which part was the lie. And it was pretty accurate.

      So then you go read the comments until you find the one guy who ACTUALLY knows what's going on when it turns out even the writers of TFA, while not lying per se, are usually purposely misrepresenting the issue. I have to give Slashdot credit for that, as I know I'm not going to get accurate news about copyright law, DRM, government end-runs etc. anywhere else.

      I'm more over at Soylent these days, but I think the first part has gotten a bit better here since then.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    203. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      almost never happens to guys? are you kidding me? Ive been insulted 4 times since I got to work by both men and women. the difference between men and women is that men tend not to report it as we understand its not a big deal

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    204. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Any theories why that is? I'm trying to imagine why there would be such a big skew towards people actually wanting to *kill* women in this context. It doesn't help them achieve any of their stereotypical oriented-around-women objectives.

      My armchair philosophy stab in the dark would be inferiority complex. Rage if you want, but I'll admit I have one sometimes.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    205. Re:Pft by phorm · · Score: 1

      Erm, read my comment. I'm certainly not saying this is acceptable, what I am saying is that all bad behaviour gets "reported" under some fairly narrow categories. Having a better way of report - and dealing with - such behaviour would be beneficial to all.

      For example, if you're reporting personal threats, a report could also scan the chat log for key-words and escalate. Racial/sexist could scan stuff like the N word or b**ch. As there are probably quite a lot of reports, this should help push stuff that's more serious and beyond the typical "noob, loser" etc up the chain.

      There's no reason an improvement to such a system couldn't benefit not only women, but everyone.

    206. Re:Pft by phorm · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I don't find the implication (that I'm black, gay, whatever) offensive so much as the terms themselves, which are particularly vile as their basic connotation is that somebody of whatever group is less valuable as a human than others.

    207. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Not to belittle the social issues we face, but people complaining about the Internet being a horrible place trigger my "no duh" reflex.

      "Doctor, it hurts when I go on 4chan"

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    208. Re:Pft by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You realize that there's more difference between your average man and your average woman than between your average NFL linebacker and your average man, right? (seriously, compare the stats some time - height, average bench strength, etc). You do realize how commonly women are raped and abused by men, and how they might happen to be more sensitive to the implicit or explicit threats of violence from someone that they're highly unlikely to be able to fight off?

      You know, if you complain about violence against your group yet dismiss violence against another group as inconsequential, you aren't likely to get - or deserve, for that matter - much sympathy, especially from that other group.

      This is something many feminists - and other rights groups as well - seem to be unable to comprehend: you can get most people to back equality. You can't get them to back a power grab. No matter how justified you believe yourself, if you dismiss everyone's pain but yours then of course they're going to dismiss yours, and rightly so.

      I'm tall, 182 centimeters, and I still once had a guy literally pick me up and carry me back to his apartment when I tried to walk away from him.

      And I had a guy pull a knife on me. But that doesn't matter since I'm a man, and thus don't have a woman's sensitivity, right? Testicles make me immune to fear and pain, thus violence and threats against me don't count. Only real human beings like you matter. I can bloody well just "stop being a sissy", since unlike you, I don't have feelings. Someone attacking you is a tragedy, but someone attacking me is of no importance because, after all, I have a penis.

      Sexist creep.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    209. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      The pragmatic argument is, do any such laws protecting J Random Group protect the group better than they cause other problems.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    210. Re:Pft by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Well damn, I sure wish somebody had pointed that out sooner than halfway down the page of 600 comments.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    211. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      That's entirely a distraction.

      Being a racist isn't, in and of itself, a problem. Racist actions are a problem, and being a racist just happens to be a motivator for making a bunch of racist actions.

      Taking racist actions without being racist is...not a particularly important distinction.

      We're not talking about a comedy club here joking about how each ethnicity drives, after all. From the article:

      They filled my Tumblr mailbox with the usual anon posts like, ‘Die, you fucking cunt!’ And, ‘You'll know when I rape your mouth hole, bitch!’

    212. Re:Pft by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      I think the thing that bothers me most about this discussion is exactly what you bring up- it was incredibly easy to predict exactly how it was going to go, and it's making me question the culture (or lack there-of) here as I go through it. It never ceases to amaze me how this site is capable of bringing in incredibly intelligent, insightful people who've taught me so much about science and technology...

      And simultaneously, an infinite number of anonymous cowards and not-so-anonymous cowards who haven't the slightest idea what they're talking about because they don't read the article, don't understand, or don't WANT to understand.

    213. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no, just to chop off our balls

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    214. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter what direction the fuckwad-*ist direction goes? What relevance does it have to anything?

      (Also you'll find social justice people defending basically all the other things you listed, except that's the first time I've ever encountered the term "swole" and honestly, anti-redhead sentiment is just not nearly as high as say, anti-trans sentiment like you were ridiculing)

    215. Re:Pft by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      it *is* illegal to have sex with someone who is visibly intoxicated to the point that they cannot make a reasonable decision.

      What happens when BOTH people involved are visibly intoxicated to the point that they cannot make a reasonable decision? In that situation, who raped whom? That is the problem with counting it as rape when a woman went to a college party, had too much to drink and had sex with a guy she met at the party. Chances are good that the guy had too much to drink as well. So, when doing statistics on rape, if the woman feels that she was not raped in that situation one might want to accept her opinion unless you have more information than just that she was too drunk to legally consent. Perhaps, the woman was the sexual aggressor and convinced the (drunk) man to have sex? Perhaps the woman went to the party intending to have sex with the man she ended up having sex with? There are many reasons why a woman would not consider sex in that situation to be rape. Is it not sexist to assume that she does not know whether or not it was rape? Especially when we assume that the man, who was also drunk, was not raped because he wanted to have sex.
      PLEASE NOTE: This is not a defense of any man who uses alcohol (or any other substance which reduces the ability to make rational decisions) to engage in sex with a woman who would otherwise turn him down.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    216. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you mean someone found public information and copy and pasted it? WOW!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    217. Re:Pft by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Actually, with the prison population being as high as it is in the US, it's possibly the only country in the world where more men than women get raped nowadays.

    218. Re:Pft by martas · · Score: 1

      It is relevant when the focus is placed on sexism rather than fuckwadism. The use of sexist insults is incidental. You could convince every person on the planet that sexism is bad and they shouldn't be sexist, and people who are trying to be hurtful would still use sexist insults because they're effective.

      And I wasn't ridiculing anti-anti-trans sentiment, I was ridiculing the fact that these sort of discussions so often center around a specific set of attributes (LGBTQQIAAP+) that do not reflect the absolute (i.e. non-relative) prevalence of abuse which centers on them. OP's assertion was that anyone who is "different from a straight, cis, white man" is attacked. Well, Gabe Newell is all of those things, but how much bullshit do you suppose he's had to deal with because he's obese? "Straight cis white man" has just become a moniker for "evil" in certain circles, which is why I'm sure OP didn't even give any thought as to how informative/useful/relevant each modifier was to the discussion.

    219. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one that brought other countries into the discussion. My point was about my own society.

      If someone else wants to expand the argument then guess what... the argument expands. And suddenly rather then pointing at the evil white people in the western world you're now dealing with people in africa and the middle east doing genital mutilations and various other fun stuff from around the world.

      If you want to reconstruct the argument to just the US or western world that's fine. You can do that. But you're not going to undermine my larger point by expanding the issue. I'll just expand my counter argument and if anything my point is stronger in a larger context.

      All this said, I can't really respond to you in full. I got dog piled by a million morons and this board has flood control. So I can't actually reply to more then a couple of you and I don't see that your further posts will be worth my limited post rations.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    220. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't redundant -- they are orthogonal.

      Cis is about what sex you view yourself as, relative to what one might have guessed at birth.

      Straight is about what sex you are interested in, relative to what sex you view yourself as.

    221. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Wait...what the fuck are you talking about?

    222. Re: Pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Research says otherwise. Individuals have profound power to influence groups of people exhibiting group-think and the like. If you are unable to withstand that cognitive bias, that's on you.

    223. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Dude, those are not okay either.

      Why do you defend some *obviously* not-okay things by giving examples of other *obviously* not-okay things?

    224. Re:Pft by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      fucking telepathy

      Infinitely better than regular telepathy... here here!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    225. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your point. The citation was for a statistic on the percent of women being raped.

      Are you asserting that as many men are being raped as women? Or what are you asserting? Even if that is your assertion, it's beside the point.

    226. Re:Pft by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I just want to add: not that I think there isn't a problem with the attitude that men can't be raped. I just don't see how it has anything to do with this thread of discussion.

    227. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      And that's bullshit too because we're all just people. I'm tired of racists and sexists attempting use fallacious logic to effectively claim we're all different breeds or species.

      We're all people. I'm a man. I'm a human being. You don't get to say I have less rights because of the color of my skin or the nature of my genitals.

      That is respectively racist or sexist.

      You don't get to tell me what I think or why I think something unless I likewise get the ability to tell you what you think or why you think that.

      Furthermore, you don't get to say why you feel something unless I get to say why I feel something.

      That is equality.

      You're upset because white people in generations past dominated other people, built empires, built elaborate philosophical models, made huge advances in science, engineering, etc...

      I had no part in any of that. You don't get to say I have less rights because of what people did before I was born that happen to have the same shade of skin.

      Lets say black people did all that stuff in ages past... would that then mean that black people don't have a right to express themselves? Would that mean that anyone that just happens to be black is not entitled to an opinion. And that any moron that isn't black can just tell them what they think indifferent to how fucking stupid it is?

      Obviously not.

      And guess what, just because some white people did some stuff long before I was born... it doesn't mean I have less rights.

      End of story.

      As to the stories of non-white people and females being harder to find. How is that my fault? Should we burn Shakespeare because he was white and had a penis? Should we burn Mozart?

      If you want more non-white stories then write one. And yeah, I appreciate its hard to compete against the likes of Shakespeare or Hemingway. But its racist and sexist to just see these guys as white men.

      They're people. They're human beings. Stop seeing everyone in racist terms. Are you saying that the great authors of western society have stories that are not applicable to people from other cultures or genders? That's nonsense. These works of art are appreciated all over the world. The Chinese and Japanese appreciate them and are great fans of western opera.

      Sadly your argument is largely a political ploy by groups in the US mostly that see exploiting white guilt and male chivalry to gain power. Its classic passive aggression. They'll claim the victim card to soften up the opposition and create a firewall around themselves against any attack. And then when the heat is off they strike out to claim ground. Any defense against an attack is deflected by aggressively calling all rivals racists or sexists.

      The likes of Al Sharpton are masters of this tactic. Its lets such people call Jews for example diamond merchants or other racist comments and then turn around and call someone else racist.

      Its a game. And the only people that support it are the incurious, stupid, or corrupt.

      I'm assuming you're simply incurious. Which is fine... however, I would ask that you refrain from offering strong points in any issue you've not thought about deeply. Its merely annoying to others that have.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    228. Re:Pft by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Fuck you. Violence is wrong.

      The irony is almost more than I can bear.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    229. Re:Pft by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I'd complement them for not knowing perl. There's a reason everyone is moving away from it.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    230. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As I said above, men are subjected to verbal abuse all the time.

      I was recently cussed out in a game I played the other day. The kid was furious.

      Did I immediately cite the kid for discrimination? He said some very unflattering things.

      No. Men have been dealing and receiving abuse of this kind for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. Thousands. Probably tens of thousands.

      And here this women comes into this situation and says its not okay.

      Really? When did that happen?

      Oh, when YOU showed up.

      Look, if she wanted to say that people are sometimes mean to people and should be nicer... that's fine.

      Make that argument for what its worth.

      But that isn't what she said. She said that women specifically are discriminated against or subject to extra abuse. That is bullshit. They're not subject to extra abuse. Actually, they're subject to less in most cases. Significantly less. But even that reduced amount that they get is often intolerable because what they want is to be protected.

      And again... that's fine. Declare yourself a protected class and you'll get the protection.

      Men are going to be harsh in any competitive situation. Its in our nature. If women want to enter fields where men are competing then they need to be able to deal with that harshness or they need to bow out.

      It is not acceptable to join the community and then demand that everyone change the way everything is done simply because your feelings hilariously sensitive while everyone else just laughs at rivals that attempt to wound them with words.

      Sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me.

      Literally that. You could sit there and concoct what you think of as the most hurtful prose imaginable and it would roll off me like water off a duck. It would be nothing to me.

      This is something most men learn from an early age. We tease each other mercilessly as children. It toughens us up. We cry and fume as children. And by the time we're adults... those of us that that went through this right of passage are immune.

      This is part of being an adult. In centuries past women were not expected to be true adults. Not entirely responsible or capable of dealing with an occasionally harsh world.

      But its the 21st century and women want to enter the game.

      The well, the rules of the game are not changing simple because the women don't like them.

      Those are the rules. Deal with it.

      Now here, women will attempt to use their various special abilities to get what they want anyway. Women still have vestiges of their old special privileges which they can use to get leverage. They can also use their advanced command of certain social skills that men often lack.

      The problem with that is that that only works against weak men. Competitive men have all those skills too.

      These are the rules. Deal with it or step away from the table.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    231. Re:Pft by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "How many men, or even black man or gay men get threats like that?"
      Umm... You do remember what used to happen to black men who the white folks didn't like just about 50 years ago (or, even 20 years ago in South Africa), don't you? You do know what used to happen to gay men in the US about 20 years ago (and still happens in the third world countries), don't you?

      I don't think any normal man would argue that there are no assholes among men. And threatening with violence is what they usually do. Women don't usually behave like that.

      Now, let's try "pissing off" a woman (regardless of the "offense" being real or just in the woman's head) and see what happens. A tiny number will pick a fight. A small number will threaten violence (directly or thinly veiled). Another small group will do the same and/or damage your property. But a huge number of them won't do anything like that. No way. The life will go on as usual. Shortly though, you will start noticing that something is off. You'll get invited to less social events. Your mutual female friends will behave differently towards you. Their female friends will behave differently towards you. Their boyfriends/husbands will hang out with you less. And so on...

      Luckily for me, I tasted just a bit of that treatment, but I've seen that happen to other people (men and - MUCH MORE OFTEN - women) plenty of times. To a different degree, obviously. Don't even start me on female cliques. Why the hell can men who hate each other's guts just nod to each other and behave like nothing is wrong if they happen to be at the same party? Why the hell does it take one insensitive remark for women to hate each other and split all the people they know according to "Whoever is not with me is against me"?

      I know which one I prefer - the male way. It's usually in your face and you know it's 90% only talk anyway. Threats don't bother me a bit. Insulting me is pretty much impossible. I have a problem with a surreptitious poisoning of my social life though.

      Of course, I understand WHY I prefer the male way - because I feel confident enough that I can handle most potential violence. Due to biology and history, women have to worry more about violence.

      I guess what I'm trying to say is that we need to work to eliminate ALL kinds of bad behavior. Right now, women are still more vulnerable so we need to work on helping them a bit more. BUT we need to work on fixing THEIR behavior too. My guess would be that IT IS the cause of a lot of bad male behavior.

    232. Re: Pft by astar · · Score: 1

      Curious. I expect men kill more women than visa versa. And I thought the reference was to evolutionary pressure. But if the woman developeress gets industry wide 86'd ....

    233. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If western culture supports rape then all cultures do and therefore it would be more correct to say that human culture supports it.

      I disagree with the premise but by your logic it would be unreasonable to put this at the feet of western culture specifically but rather attribute it to a basic human quality.

      At which point you're not able to play this game against the evil white man. Rather, you're dealing with fundamental qualities of the human species itself encompassing all races, creeds, ideologies, and genders.

      This is a fallacious game played against the incurious and stupid by the incurious and dishonest.

      I'm neither incurious, stupid, or dishonest.

      I am willing to deal with the complexity of the argument and work out all the details until it comes to a conclusion.

      I am clever enough to keep all the relevant logic in mind and cross reference all points in proper context.

      And I am introspective and humble enough to know my limitations and I have a deep respect for intellectual integrity such that if I am wrong I will happily commit rhetorical seppuku as honor demands.

      The above statements which will sound like bragging to the callow are a statement of ability to deal with complex philosophical issues. Nothing more or less.

      And as such, I am neither afraid nor confused by these issues. Its just math to me. Simple math at that.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    234. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      More stupid strawman arguments.

      if the women in question were being subjected to levels of abuse beyond what men were getting it wouldn't be seen as acceptable.

      People get away with the abuse against women in those environments because the abuse in question isn't really abuse. Its the normal back and forth you find in any competitive work place.

      Note... COMPETITIVE work place. Not a cubicle drone farm. Those are not competitive work places.

      In anything competitive, people are going to get nasty. It might be openly nasty or it might be a highly choreographed dance of destruction. Consider many asian cultures that have many social rules governing conduct. And yet, objectively there is still exploitation... if anything the rules often serve to reinforce or formalize the exploitation.

      If civility is all you want then I'll warn you that anyone clever can insult or dominate you just as easily while being perfectly civil.

      Manners are no indication of good will.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    235. Re:Pft by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "Can you please post those stats, and a source? When people make claims like this, it's important to back them up and they be scrutinized."
      Seriously? Doesn't a simple fact that male and female athletes compete separately hint at anything?

    236. Re:Pft by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Oh come now sir! You are being perfectly unreasonable. It is only rational and christian to discriminate against fat, bucktoothed redheads!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    237. Re:Pft by upl8n87447 · · Score: 2

      Most white males don't find any reason to feel substandard in any way based on the race and gender they were born into. When they are insulted based on that race and gender, it comes off as a joke because they have never, in their entire lives, been repressed based on either of those characteristics. The insults of their gender / race do not hit to the bone. Now, if someone were to insult them by calling them some homophobic slur, a white male w/ insecurity issues may be a bit upset that someone is trying to label them something they're not, but it couldn't possibly hurt them as much as attacking them for something that they are and have no control over.

      Contrast this to women, minorities, and/or LGBT. A woman's gender is insulted. A minority's race is insulted. An LGBT is insulted for being who they are.

      Sexuality is usually something people feel the need to use as an attacking mechanism because it is so personal. However, for one guy to say they're going to rape another guy is construed as humorous because no guy actually has reason to fear that this could or will actually happen. Meanwhile, a woman, who does live in real fear of actually being raped (based on how often it actually happens), may take a threat like this to heart. Same goes for sexuality. Call a straight guy a 'fag', and it's an unwarranted slight. Call a gay person a 'fag', and it's an insult to a huge piece of who they are.

      There are a few ways we can fix these problems. First, we need to cleanup the community. Attacking peoples sexuality, race, and gender should be off limits. Threats of rape should be taken seriously just as they are in the real world. Tell a person that you're going to find them and rape them should lead to jail time. Just because the little childrens feel like acting big and bad on the internet behind the shield of anonymity does not make internet threats any different than real world threats. It really is the anonymity that allows people to be such d-bags online, when there's no way someone would get away with this in person. Therefore, I personally believe that anonymity online should be disallowed. It's one thing to be anonymous when you're online. What you do that only impacts you should be anonymous. However, as soon as you begin interacting with others, where what you say needs to be held accountable, then anonymity should be removed.

      The gaming community has developed this way due to lack of protection and enforcement. Something should be, and needs to be done. The end result is likely more people willing to get into gaming while not having to deal with immaturity and harassment.

    238. Re:Pft by airdweller · · Score: 1

      " Didn't you hear your sisters in arms giving you your marching orders? You're not supposed to admit that women are more sensitive to abuse... You're supposed to tow the party line, claiming that the only cause is evil men are being more verbally abusive to women."
      What's with this lame attempt at sarcasm? I thought we were adults discussing a serious issue here.

      "Carrying a knife will even things out quite nicely, though. Clawing out eyes works pretty good, too."
      You really don't understand that not everyone is capable of fighting? How old are you? Ten?

    239. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      We all know prison rapes don't count. After all, only evil people are in prison to begin with.

      It's an urban legend. Studies find that prison rape is actually rare:

      http://nij.gov/topics/correcti...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    240. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      pick one that doesn't also apply virtually equally to women.

      Women are seriously beaten and murdered at FAR LOWER rates than men. You seem to have a real problem with FACTS.

      I'm supposed to walk around armed at all times (illegal here),

      There's no territory in the world where it's illegal to carry a modest-size knife.

      and if I don't, then it's my fault and its not really rape?

      I never said anything of the sort. I simply said that you have options, and being deathly afraid of everyone is not necessary, nor is being physically small an excuse to get the world to cater to you.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    241. Re:Pft by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      "I have yet to talk to a man who has had to call a police officer due to a stalker, only to be told nothing can be done until they are physically assaulted."

      Twice I've had that conversation and couple more times I didn't because I already knew what they would say. I know plenty of guys that have been stalked by ex-girlfriends or woman they have worked with, it's not at all unusual. They call the guy over and over, inappropriately show up where he is, try to come between him and any other woman he has a relationship with, sometimes threaten or start fights with his girlfriend or wife. I don't work in a high profile job, and I've had stalkers, one even convinced me to move 500 miles away.

      This may happen more frequently to women but don't be deluded into thinking it doesn't happen to men either. It shouldn't happen to begin with.

    242. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      ok, and I as a male have also been told that people are going to cut off my dick and shove it up my ass as a moderator. the difference is I laugh at it, not file a police report

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    243. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      So you have some perverse idea of what feminism is meant to be [...] (b) is your own invention in the first place.

      Bullshit. I pulled the assertion straight from TFA. You can't blame me for it. Did YOU bother to read TFA?

      From TFA:

      "people think men and women receive the same harassment online. They do not."

      "The Myth: Everyone in the games industry experiences harassment. Women are just too sensitive about it."

      "If you are a woman in the industry with a critical opinion, you will get a disproportional amount of criticism, hostility, and scrutiny compared to men."

      "male privilege makes them feel free to lash out."

      You're insane.

      I'm merely stating the logical conclusion of GP's self-justifications. What part of my statement is inaccurate? Of course demonizing anyone who disagrees with you is so much easier than honestly addressing the issues they bring up.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    244. Re:Pft by russotto · · Score: 1

      I used to hold an attitude very much like yours, but I took some tests on this site

      Congratulations, you've just been push-polled. Those tests aren't built to discover bias, they're built to convince you that you are biased.

    245. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      This is a strawman argument.

      I made it clear that women could be treated the same as men or be treated as women.

      Those are their options. In western society, how do we treat men?

      That is what I'm asking women to accept if they want to compete with men.

      If you are competing for my job then don't expect me to pull punches or go easy on you. If its you or me and you've put yourself out as my equal. Then I'm not going to go easy on you. This is generally what women keep asking for however. They keep asking to be included in competitive environments and then when subjected to ACTUAL competition they cry foul because its often harsh and brutal.

      Tough shit. You've joined a game of water polo. If all you want to do is play with pool noodles and splash each other then go back to the shallow end. Or if you want to just do laps then go to the marked off area where people swim back and forth alone. But in the game of water polo which you've said you want to be included in... get tough or get out.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    246. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 1

      Oh, he was totally planning to prove a predetermined point. He was going to write about how women were just whining and it wasn't a problem.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    247. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 1

      I suspect there's not much actual wanting to kill, just wanting to threaten. And why? Because there's a lot of guys who are very threatened by the idea that women could be as good at stuff as they are.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    248. Re:Pft by seebs · · Score: 1

      Well, one option would be to actually make friends with enough people that you could collect your own data.

      I mean, it's an Internet comment thread. People are just reporting what they've encountered. It's just that I've consistently found that what they report is wildly different.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    249. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this is the tenth strawman argument in a row I've had to deal with so far. Congratulations.

      Threatening someone with rape is not treating them like a girl. Being threatened with rape is something men deal with all the time however.

      If a man says to another man "I AM GOING TO FUCK YOU RAW"... what is that? Its interpreted often as a threat to do violence and not actually rape the person. But literally the statement is a threat to rape. And men deal with that sort of comment all the time without trying to make a civil rights issue out of it.

      Yesterday, I had a guy get of his car and chase my car with a baseball bat.

      What did I do? I spun my car around, moved towards the man with my car about six feet, enough that he knew I could have just run his stupid ass over if I felt like it, literally this big guy with a baseball bat was instantly scared shitless, then I said out my side window "I don't have time for you", then spun my car around, and drove away.

      This is the glory of the manual transmission. Very fast acceleration over very short distances.

      That is how a man deals with a threat of violence.

      What the woman is asking for here is to be protected. Literally that is what she is saying here. "Protect me"... "I'm a victim"... "there are bad people and they hurt my feelings." Men don't ask for that. We protect ourselves. Up to the point of going to thermonuclear war. Literally.

      If women want to compete with men they need to be able to deal with that without instantly screaming like children for help.

      Toughen up or bow out.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    250. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      This is the eleventh strawman argument used against me in this thread.

      The topic was complaining about WOMEN being treated badly.

      I countered that they were actually just being treated like MEN. And that if they don't want to be treated like MEN then we would be happy to treat them like WOMEN.

      What you are saying is that "MEN treat other MEN badly and shouldn't"... I don't disagree.

      However, that isn't sexism. The WOMAN in this post accused MEN of sexism when really the MEN were treating her as an equal.

      Now if she instead said "PEOPLE treat other PEOPLE badly sometimes" then that would be a different argument.

      Your strawman argument was stupid. Don't do it again unless you want to be taken for either a moron or a degenerate. And that is not an example of someone on the internet being mean to someone else on the internet. Strawmen arguments are logically fallacious and often examples of dishonest rhetorical styles. People that use them either are so ignorant that they don't know how to make an argument or they're so dishonest that they don't care.

      Don't do it again... please.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    251. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to most white males, what does that matter to me?

      Am I most white males? Do I have no right to individuality?

      What if I made some comment about most black males or most asian females and then attempted to use some anecdotal example to justify treating those people differently then anyone else?

      You'd say rightly that that was racist.

      Well guess what, sport. You're a racist. Because you think its okay to classify all white people into one group. Millions of people you've never met. And you think you know how all of us think and feel about everything.

      Guess what. I'm a white male and I wouldn't pretend to know the mind of all white males. You have no clue what you're talking about. No one does.

      None of us are telepaths. We can't read other people's minds and we certainly don't know the minds of people we've never met.

      Classifying millions of people into giant lump categories simply on the basis of race is at best ignorant and at worst racist.

      As to feeling substandard, I clearly feel threatened by this argument which is why I'm defending myself.

      As to what people feel beyond that... I can only guess and that's all you or anyone else can do either.

      You don't know what I think. And I don't know what you think. All we have are our words and our observations.

      As to what I was born into. You have no idea. I have no idea what you were born into. And I am not responsible for what people did before I was born. I had no part in their choices. So I don't care what they did.

      Furthermore, you can't associate me with simply because we share skin tones. That silly. I don't even share blood with the people that did those things and neither do a lot of white people.

      There are a lot of us. The ancestors of some white people did some nasty stuff. So you want to claim ALL white people today are responsible for that? Comically racist. At most you could hold direct descendants responsible and only in so far as property that was inherited from those people. But that's it.

      Most of my ancestors in those days were so far down the pecking order that they didn't decide anything or oppress anyone. They were at best the oppressed themselves.

      In this enlightened age, my bloodline has come to these shores and made a life in this new land. And here I am in the 21st century being asked to account for the actions of men that died before I was born that aren't even blood relations of myself?

      Please.

      As to insults hurting someone because it actually describes who they are... White people are called "whitey" or other similar things all the time.

      We do take it as bigotry and it does hurt us.

      But rather then try to make a civil rights issue out of it, we instead lower our estimation of the person that delivered it. And of course if we can find some way to pay the insult back... within proportion... then we're human beings like everyone else and will of course revenge ourselves if wronged.

      Seriously, brother... If you prick me do I not bleed? Your whole argument rests upon the belief that white people are ultimately inhuman. That nothing touches us. We're as human as anyone else.

      Push us around and we're going to push you back one way or the other.

      As to your fixes:

      1. I have no problem with cleaning up the community but do not try to use anti discrimination rhetoric to do it.

      You say "people need to be nice to other people"... or your argument will be taken as an attack against white men or whomever is the villain of your fiction. And we will undermine the effort.

      Why would we do otherwise. Its an attack. We will defend and then counter attack.

      Seriously... my problem with her post was the claim that men are discriminating against women.

      We're not. They told us they wanted to be treated like equals and we took them at their word. Do you want to be treated like an equal... with all the ugly back and forth that some times comes with that... or do you want to be treated like a protected class?

      Choose.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    252. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      And I disagree with your comment about 'nice ass' - unless you are complimenting somebody's donkey, this counts as an uninvited, sexual advance.

      no, this is called a complement. perhaps you were brought up with no manners and have no idea what that is, but simply telling someone that she looks nice (or a part of her looks nice) is not an unwanted sexual advance. What next? "hey have you lost weight?"turns into sexual harassment??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    253. Re:Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no it doesnt. if we as men have been doing the same thing for generations and it has never been an issue just becomes women scream EQUALITY OMG!_! does not mean we need to change

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    254. Re:Pft by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Of course, when something actually *does* happen to a woman, she'll be blamed for not being more careful. After all, she's been getting threats all this time, hasn't she? She shoulda known that it was dangerous to leave her house.

      Why don't we step back a bit - when is death/assault threats *ever* a valid response to anything involving video games?

    255. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No. The point is that it isn't sexism. If I treat both men and women badly it is not sexism when I treat a woman badly.

      Its an equal opportunity offender.

      For example... lets say a shark eats an asian person. Did the shark commit a hate crime?

      How do you know? Maybe the shark wouldn't have eaten a white guy. The shark could be racist.

      Here's is one of the larger issues with accusations of racism and sexism. You've reversed due process by forcing the accused to prove they're innocent rather then requiring the prosecution to prove their case.

      That is... the burden of proof is on YOU prove I am sexist or racist. Simply making some nasty remarks is poor evidence of anything. Those remarks for one thing could be leveled at either sex and probably are by that same person. What is more, you'd have to show that there was some sort of intention behind it and not merely a meaningless emotional outburst.

      Now you can cite them for saying mean things to you and that can be an established fact. However, you cannot from that conclude that the person in question is racist or sexist.

      For example, you might be aware of the the Michael Richards situation where the comedian was heckled by some black people in his audience. Richards lost control and started issuing racist remarks against the men. Does that mean Michael Richards is a racist? No. There's no evidence one way or the other if he's a racist. But its just as likely that Richards lost control and thought of the most hurtful thing he could come up with and threw that at the people harassing him.

      And by and large that is what most people get... male or female or black or white. The threats are not real or credible in most cases. They're just emotional outbursts where one person is trying to hurt the feelings of another person. Full stop.

      For example, I got very upset with a friend many years ago and I called him white trash. The guy grew up in a trailer park and is sensitive about it. I really hurt his feelings when I said that and that was the point at the time. He was doing things at the time that really pissed me off and I wanted to hurt him because that was the only way I could communicate how angry I was at him. It was that or hit him.

      Now did I regret saying that? Almost immediately. I felt very badly about it and apologized to him shortly there after. But does that mean I was discriminating against him or something? No. He threw out some insults against me which were nearly as hurtful and the only reason he didn't do more was because he couldn't think of anything else to hit me with. It was a big ugly argument.

      Now imagine if he were a different race or gender or I was... I'm pretty sure that race and gender would have been used in our insults simply because we'd grasp anything we could use to hurt each other.

      That isn't racism or sexism. That's just an out of control argument. Period.

      Now on the internet with the gaming 10 year olds screaming at each other... that isn't racism or sexism either. That's just an emotionally under developed child losing control against faceless people in an environment with no consequences.

      Nothing more.

      Point being. Toughen up or don't log on. You're going to cused out. It will happen.

      The last time it happened to me, I laughed at the kid, and started throwing much better insults back at him. He rage quit and I slept like a baby.

      Everyone needs thicker skin. Stop crying discrimination or trying to invoke the civil rights movement every time someone hurts your precious little feelings.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    256. Re:Pft by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Yes, men are raped too. About 91% of rape cases are male->female, 8% male->male, 0.8% female->female, and 0.2% female->male. Men are virtually always the perpetrator, but even when the victim is male (not nearly as common, but still way more common than we as a society should accept), the perpetrator is still overwhelmingly likely to be male.

      Overwhelmingly is almost too light a word here. Let's put this into some hard numbers. Take 1000 rape cases, put all the victims on one side of the room, put all the perps on the other. There are ten women on the perp side of the room (outnumbered literally 99-to-1 by men), and 82 men on the other side of the room (outnumbered "only" 11-to-1 by women).

      Go figure that women worry about being raped by men...

    257. Re:Pft by werepants · · Score: 1

      I used to hold an attitude very much like yours, but I took some tests on this site

      Congratulations, you've just been push-polled. Those tests aren't built to discover bias, they're built to convince you that you are biased.

      Except that they showed I held no bias with race. Why don't you actually try it, and see if you can find a flaw with their methodology? Researchers need a good tool to study bias, and AFAIK this is a pretty highly regarded one. It's published by the psych dept. at Harvard FFS - I don't know what you WOULD consider a good test for bias.

    258. Re:Pft by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Yep. However, women killing men isn't as big of a problem. If you hadn't noticed, men are cautious around men, as well.

    259. Re:Pft by Boronx · · Score: 1

      And your point is...?

    260. Re: Pft by ultranova · · Score: 2

      That is how a man deals with a threat of violence.

      If he wants to end up dead or in jail, yes. Smart people simply speed away from the dumbass who's chasing a car on foot, and maybe report him to the police.

      Men don't ask for that. We protect ourselves. Up to the point of going to thermonuclear war. Literally.

      And you see this as such a desirable result that not only do you not seek to change your ways, but you actively recommend others to embrace them?

      Dude, Broforce is fiction.

      Toughen up or bow out.

      Grow up or die. Next crazy dude you humiliate might come visit you with ten friends. Natural selection only has so much patience for your bullshit.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    261. Re:Pft by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Just because the average gamer is now mature doesn't mean that there isn't a sizeable population of wankers out there too.

      Anyway, what's wrong with the word 'fuck'? I use it daily, in the office, and it would be sexist of me to try and avoid it in front of my female colleagues.

    262. Re:Pft by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you're normal are you? I guess that makes the rest of us the fucking freaks?

      Fuck you and your normality.

    263. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to ending up in jail or dead, nothing I did was illegal. He brandished a weapon at me and I showed him I had a bigger one.

      I then dissed him and left.

      As to your second point, I looked for a point in it... and couldn't see an actual argument in it. Please rephrase.

      As to your third point, I have millions of years of natural selection humming in my veins. I am not some skittish herd beast. I not a rat. I am not a rabbit.

      I am a homo sapian. A man. I'm the ape that cracks atoms and marks his territory on the moon.

      Come at me.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    264. Re: Pft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      re-read the article, there are at least 3 blanket generalizations in there that if a man was saying it, the author would be offended by. so while she may not have suggested it, she was guilty of doing so

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    265. Re:Pft by Cederic · · Score: 1

      There's no territory in the world where it's illegal to carry a modest-size knife.

      https://www.gov.uk/find-out-if...

    266. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Your link says a 3 inch knife is legal (which is pretty common) which is plenty big enough for self defense.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    267. Re:Pft by Cederic · · Score: 1

      He probably wouldn't have reported it. Men don't usually report minor (in the sense of no visible physical injury) incidents of assault and battery unless they were looking for any ammunition they could use against someone (i.e. they really hate the attacker and want to get back at them).

      Yeah, I didn't report the assault I received from a woman in the workplace.

      I did make notes of the incident and keep them offsite, for fear that she'd complain about me for my response to the assault - I turned and told her that if she did that again I'd punch her in the face.

      She didn't report it, so I didn't bother to report it either. She was a very sexist person though.

    268. Re: Pft by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Freedom of speech is a larger subject than the first amendment, the constitution of the USA, and the USA as a whole.

      While the first amendment restricts what the US governments can do, it is Valve and such's policy that affects people's freedom of speech while playing these games.

      Yes, they are legally allowed to do what they wish with their property. It doesn't mean that has zero impact on my freedom of speech.

      And no, I don't think that they should be forced to let these hate-filled douchbags shit up the gameplay on their servers. But don't imagine for a moment that they are absolved of all issues revolving around freedom of speech. If they went full authoritarian commune-nazi, they would no longer have me as a customer.

    269. Re:Pft by tackdriver · · Score: 1

      Then tell me that they don't face harassment, irregardless of gender.

      irregardless is not a word

    270. Re:Pft by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      A soon as I saw the term 'cis' I realised what sort of whinger was posting

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    271. Re:Pft by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Credible threats huh? Idiot

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    272. Re:Pft by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Just saying "that's not cool" would do more than sitting around passively when you do see it happen.

      I won't shit on people who don't say anything when they see something happen - maybe they're afraid, I don't know - but I certainly will applaud people who do say something.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    273. Re: Pft by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Dude, seriously, you are such the caricature of an internet tough guy, it's fucking awesome. And I admire your commitment to the charade, too.

      Just remember, some people aren't in on the joke and might take you seriously and think the incredibly stupid shit you're claiming you have done is a good idea.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    274. Re:Pft by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      tl;dr

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    275. Re: Pft by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Women make up a tiny proportion of developers, but we still see passion plays like this in forums where developers dwell on a daily basis. So, who precisely is harassing who here?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    276. Re: Pft by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Less of a problem than men killing other men, statistically.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    277. Re:Pft by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, as a white male, I've never received a rape threat, and darn few death threats. Nobody has ever tracked me down to insult and threaten me. What am I doing wrong?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    278. Re:Pft by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thank you for an excellent example of gross insensitivity, and making insulting claims based on a person's sexuality.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    279. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You've apparently never played an online video game, driven in busy city traffic with your window open, ridden on a bus, or employed teenagers.

      Do any of the above and you're going to deal with a fair amount of swearing on a regular basis.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    280. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      for soldiers one would expect long endurance would be a plus. Ultrarunning is something where men and women appear to compete on a somewhat even footing.

      Women are nearly competitive with men at long-distance running only because of their lower weight. Once they are outfitted with 100lbs of gear (which firefighters and soldiers are), they suddenly and dramatically lose their parity with men.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    281. Re: Pft by ultranova · · Score: 1

      As to ending up in jail or dead, nothing I did was illegal. He brandished a weapon at me and I showed him I had a bigger one.

      Escalating a fight when you don't need to is stupid and, in most places, illegal.

      As to your second point, I looked for a point in it... and couldn't see an actual argument in it. Please rephrase.

      Nuclear war is a bad thing, since it'll kill you. Promoting behaviour that leads to it is stupid.

      As to your third point, I have millions of years of natural selection humming in my veins. I am not some skittish herd beast. I not a rat. I am not a rabbit.

      No, you're just some dude with serious impulse control issues and delusions of grandieur.

      I am a homo sapian. A man. I'm the ape that cracks atoms and marks his territory on the moon.

      Claiming credit for other people's achievements is not the least bit impressive.

      Come at me.

      Why?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    282. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not an internet tough guy though... I'm just a man. Nothing special. Comes with having balls.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    283. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I didn't escalate anything. I left.

      Take me to court and I'll successfully argue that I just drove away.

      You want to play stupid legal games with me? I'm perfectly happy to engage on any front. In the courtroom or otherwise.

      And I don't say that because I think I'm tough or particularly good at fighting. I'm just clever enough to know how to win. And if push comes to shove... so be it.

      As to nuclear war... you've totally missed the point. the point is that if given the choice between bending over and taking it up the ass or fighting to the death. Men generally choose the latter.

      And we'll carry that right up to Armageddon.

      As to my accomplishments, I'm not claiming credit for anything or trying to impress you. Why after all would I care if you're impressed or not?

      I'm explaining rather that I'm not some skittish herd animal. You flash your teeth at me and I'm not running away.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    284. Re:Pft by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have played some MMORGs, driven in busy city traffic with my window open, and ridden on buses frequently. To repeat, I've never received a rape threat or many death threats, and those weren't in the situations you describe. I've heard and seen people use language I wouldn't, but I didn't receive hate email from them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    285. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Why did you receive a death threat? You do appreciate a death threat is worse then a rape threat right?

      What were you doing?

      As to receiving hate email, I don't receive much either but then I go out of my way to make that impossible. I do receive a fair amount of hate on any internet forum that discusses topics of religion, philosophy, economics, or often science as the case may be... On the purely technical forums I generally don't get any heat.

      But the instant a topic is started that involves people's identities or world views... Boom. Hate everywhere.

      And what would you have me do with it? Run away ceding the argument to anyone willing to drop an F bomb? Call for the help of the admin and be branded a coward, weak, cry baby, etc? Should I simply remain polite even with someone spitting in my face. Allowing them to color every point with invective while I hold to nothing but a purely logical position devoid of emotion or reprisal?

      or should I engage them on fronts and attempt to rip apart their likely immature ego at the same I rip apart their argument?

      Choose any of the above or possibly something I didn't cite. That's your choice. But don't fault me for engaging. Its what I do.

      And here someone is going to accuse me of being an internet tough guy just for saying I believe in holding my ground when challenged. Because not running away apparently is a sign of empty and immature bravado.

      The counter arguments are as tedious as they are intellectually vacuous.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    286. Re:Pft by Zxern · · Score: 1

      One where you don't know you're being tested for bias.

    287. Re:Pft by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Lying troll.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    288. Re:Pft by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Having said that I find that they are generally well balanced and fair in my country, and apply equally to both genders. I have benefited from them, and I'm male (e.g. I now get the same relaxed dress code as women do)."

      I thought you lived in the UK too? I've certainly seen no such benefit from law changes. Many of us males still have to wear shirts and suit trousers and often a tie at minimum, whilst women come in wearing whatever they really want to wear as long as it isn't casual to the point of ripped jeans or whatever.

      I suspect if you've seen benefit in being able to dress down it's just a company policy. I've not seen any evidence of legally enforced change on that front.

    289. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      That's cute...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    290. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What you describe is sexual discrimination. While men and women can have differing dress codes (to stay within social norms) the code must not favour one or the other gender overall. If women are given significantly more freedom then you have a case you could take up with your boss, and if that doesn't get you anywhere you can go to tribunal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    291. Re:Pft by Xest · · Score: 1

      And become a pariah amongst the directors?

      Without explicit legislation to make it clear to employers I don't really see how a more general law on discrimination, that is never actually used to protect males in the UK is going to do anything to change societal attitudes. Certainly I've seen companies change their behaviour in general and allow casual dress all around, but I've never seen a company do it on the basis of discrimination law, nor am I necessarily even sure they would win the case. Is it discrimination? sure, but how many successful discrimination cases have there been about males being discriminated against over females? Fathers for justice would've been out of business years ago if the general discrimination laws actually protected males in this manner in practice, they really don't, nor do they seem intended to given the lack of will to make sure that they do.

    292. Re:Pft by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I've been seeing this Cis a lot in these bash all men posts recently - and it's still not clear to me from your description what that means - when I went to college CIS was Computer Information Systems - a degree path.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    293. Re:Pft by werepants · · Score: 1

      Well, that is kind of an impossibility for a self-test, yes? No pleasing you guys.

    294. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      I was kidding.. I actually agree with you completely. I was saying that if you assert it is not a problem for men and ignore/write off any occurrence then of course it will look like only women suffer from it.

    295. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      White men do. But the point about this article is that women get it much, much more.

      And others disagree which is why they're trying to give you evidence to the contrary. I would say that this dogmatic belief of yours causes you to ignore and overlook any contrary information and thus reinforces your bias. Some might even think that's a bit "special".

    296. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I'm always fascinated when I see comments like this. Threatening rape against one of my relatives (female or male) would be a fairly dangerous activity as the greater family take those threats to heart.

    297. Re:Pft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The same argument could be made about any kind of employment law. Rely on it and the directors will persecute you. In reality they tend not to though, because they know that if they do they are just in for more pain.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    298. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Even before Tailhook and all that other definitive stuff, if someone threatened a women in my work group they were looking for trouble. It's irrational to think that all men or women are reasonable. Drama queens excel on both sides of the fence but attacking/threatening/stalking a women is the line for my culture. We watched a sexual harassment video a few months back where some weirdo figured it was okay to sexually assault a woman. In the Navy, we have a Chief (1983ish) do that and damn near die from the beating he got from her co-workers response. This world in which it is okay to hurt women is not mine.

    299. Re:Pft by Xest · · Score: 1

      Not really, some are backed by explicit laws targeting that specific issue, but also backed by strict enforcement. For example, race discrimination is strongly enforced. Employers actively try and prevent it because they know there is a strong cost to it.

      The same isn't true of discrimination against men and what they wear in the workplace, there isn't any active engagement against it and there isn't even a strong societal backing against it and so it goes under the radar, because employers know that no one is going to haul them into court for it and that it's not something they're going to suffer reputational damage on because everyone is doing it.

      Or to put it another way, as I pointed out the laws on discrimination have zero impact on this particular issue - their existence is largely irrelevant to the problem, compared to issues such as racism or sexism in favour of women where they have a much greater impact and are much more actively enforced.

    300. Re:Pft by russotto · · Score: 1

      I totally get it. Male nerds don't call eachothers cunts.

      AMERICAN male nerds don't. That particular insult is less taboo in other English-speaking countries.

    301. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Nice rebuttal.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    302. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Where does one apply for this arbiter of culture and bigotry role?

    303. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      You have a point. It seems that word floats through ever pub I've visited in Cambridge as of late.

    304. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I hear you, but this makes no sense. Why would anyone feel threatened a women could do a job? Statistically, I'm more worried about the H1B worker that magically sits at the office for 16 hours a day, violating every semblance of security protocols.

    305. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I assumed it was a joke. Nobody who has ever spent time in a US prison or spoken with someone who has would refer to the problem as 'an urban legend'.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    306. Re:Pft by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      You should read your citations better. It says people with staff-inmate relations (which are a federal felony Deterring Staff Sexual Abuse of Federal Inmates) don't consider them wrong. Much like teenagers, I'm sure that inmates aren't in a position of authority and cannot legally consent to assigned guardians.

    307. Re:Pft by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      My point was that survey was designed specifically to prove the authors' biases. That men rape women at alarming rates. It is an immediately visible flaw in their methodology. I did not have time to look through it in depth to find how many other flaws it has. I predict a few more. The original sentiment put forward was that results of these studies are wildly inconsistent. I am suggesting that is because of bias from those performing them.

      It is also relevant because if you look up a bit you will notice Rei using these kind of numbers to show why women have more to fear about these things than men. Well when these numbers are so specifically tailored to completely erase female perpetrators and male victims then of course women are going to be the primary victims.

    308. Re:Pft by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Ignorance in action.

    309. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what urban legends are. Anecdotes don't trump authoritative studies.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    310. Re:Pft by russotto · · Score: 1

      Your link fails to support your claim, so there's nothing to trump.

    311. Re:Pft by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Did the study attempt to cope with the underreporting issue?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    312. Re: Pft by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Yes, men are killers, that's the point. Look at the way men interact which other. It's all about signaling that they aren't trying to kill each other while staying on guard and looking aggressive. You shake hands or bow, you smile, and praise each other, but you stand up straight, face them directly, look them in the eye, don't show weakness.

    313. Re:Pft by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      You should reword that so it's not in past tense. I don't know what rock you live under, but women are still constantly denigrated at work, politics, school, and elsewhere. The glass ceiling still exists and is real.

    314. Re:Pft by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      Typo on the average male weight. It's 193. But, what really scares me is that I could get raped by a linebacker.

    315. Re:Pft by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Men are threatened with violence in other ways. Not to be a jerk, but men get equivalent threats all the time. You cant take that kind of stuff seriously or think its a special persecution. Being a woman is just a personalized vector of attack in this situation. Women just flat out dont understand male power structures.

      --
      Good-bye
    316. Re:Pft by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      If a woman is going to be forceful, she has to filter through the power structure JUST LIKE MEN DO. Men will resist anyone they feel is not properly ascending. Men have to filter what they say TOO.

      --
      Good-bye
    317. Re:Pft by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      NO ONE is ok with that. GO TO THE POLICE if that is happening. Work the problem. And you are SO ABSOLUTELY WRONG that men dont toughen up and put on flase airs at the workplace, so very very fucking wrong.

      --
      Good-bye
    318. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder how someone could find out...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    319. Re:Pft by Bardez · · Score: 1



      Glad to know that you are mentally sound, of good health, mid-thirties, have a full head of hair, well endowed in the chest and/or genitals, physically attractive (but not overly so), weigh the correct amount for your height, have a nominal muscle mass, have a low count of body hair, speak the local language fluently without accent, have perfect vision and ocular muscle behavior and have had an average number of sexual partners.

      Some of us aren't quite so lucky, you insensitive clod!

      </sarcasm>

      --
      Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
    320. Re:Pft by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Point taken, I scanned the first part and it sounded like the one I remembered.

      I've had a hell of a time finding links to the study (as opposed to the book for sale), which was widely available a few years ago.

      http://blog.case.edu/case-news...

      http://www.newmaterials.com/Ne...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    321. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Its not? Maybe when you are amongst a group of friends who each rib each other...on a public forum, it most definitely is equal to racism or sexism or homophobia...

    322. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Sadly I don't have any mod points

    323. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1
      So the expectation to not be insulted for who you are and the expectation to not be threatened with violence is the same as demanding special treatment? What world do you live in?

      I know plenty of white males most of whom are pretty nice guys, you otoh are an idiot which has nothing to do with your ethnicity, your gender or your orientation...as to your rhetoric about how the world is discriminating against straight white men when the topic of discussion is how women working in a particular industry are harassed, its pathetic, it reeks of attention whoring and from what I can tell, you have a very childish attitude of 'me, me, me'...I am sure you'll find some aspect of discrimination against straight white men somewhere in my comment but rest assured, that's just in your head...you could have been from an entirely different planet and your comment would have merited this very same response...

      I'm not asking for anything that I don't ask from myself.

      Wow, you actually expect to get threatening emails containing your address to prove to you that the person making the threat is fully capable of carrying out their threat? Errrmmm whatever floats your boat...just don't expect others to put up with that sort of shit without trying to do something about it, oh look, that's exactly what the writer of the post is doing, trying to do something about it to raise awareness but I am sure she is somehow discriminating against straight white blokes or being childish, how dastardly of her

    324. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      That is more a problem with the rest of the world, not with the West...depending on how strong the conservative groups in a given country are, the situation would be that much worse...you are a conservative, luckily for most Americans, you are not as dominant as you'd like to be hence you are left to spew your vitriol on the internet instead of successfully taking your country back to the stone age

    325. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      In simpler words, you're a conservative troll

    326. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what sort of community you live in but that is not the norm in civilized societies, no wonder you seem so confused

    327. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      You're a snake is what you are...there happy now?

    328. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not a conservative.

      That's just what your political faction calls its enemies. Its your own version of "heretic"... and really the fact that you don't realize it renders your petty judgements of my opinions or positions in these issues laughable.

      You're a callow puppet. Maybe some day you'll be more. But today... nothing more.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    329. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Wow and there you prove, beyond any doubt, just how sexist you actually are

    330. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Another stupid strawman.

      She didn't say "people should be nicer to people". She said that women are discriminated against.

      I pointed out that in the contexts she cited that was not the case. That in fact, men suffer the same treatment all the time therefore there is no sexual discrimination since the abuse is generally equal between the genders.

      Now you sit here saying I'm arguing against people being nice to each other.

      You're an intellectual vacuum. A perfect absence of thought or reason.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    331. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not a snake. I am a man. Though I begin to question what you are?... Are you some sad little chat bot masquerading as a person?

      Not the best attempt at the turning test.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    332. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      You are not a conservative? Your posts reeked of conservatism but even then before posting my comment, I checked your posting history and you most certainly are a poster child for conservativism (meh, I had some time to burn and your pointless and rather offensive diatribe was kinda sorta pissin me off so why not)

    333. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Los Angeles, NYC, Chicago, Dallas, and Seattle.

      I can tell you that people deal with morons screaming at them on and off again.

      Most of them are harmless emotional outbursts. Some of them are crazy people. Some of them are bullies that like to see other people flinch.

      You take it case by case and respond as you see appropriate. But claiming no one is cused out is frankly idiotic. Everyone lives in such societies. Its just human.

      What is the murder rate of your city? what is the rape rate? What is the assault rate?

      Do you have a verbal abuse rate? Of course not. Its beneath notice. Much like this topic, no one gives a shit.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    334. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm neither a conservative nor a troll.

      Conservative is merely what your faction calls its enemies.

      Think about it if you can. Think of all your enemies. They're all "conservatives" aren't they? Does that seem rational to you? Or can you just begin to pierce the vale of propaganda.

      I am not your enemy you stupid little child. I am merely awake and aware. I hope one day you too open your eyes... though I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    335. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      And I have yet to hear anyone tell a man to go back to the kitchen (regardless of the man's ethnicity). And men are generally not sent emails containing their home address to make a point and if you know men who're being threatened like that and they are happy to take it (because of their thick skins), the problem is with their attitude, the author of this blog post has done what any sane person should do, seen a problem and attempted to fix it the way she thought was best.

      Also, how many men have had a pornographic comic series based around them and some online douchebag? You think this behaviour is not gender specific? You are dumber than dumb and dumber

    336. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      At least I am attempting to sound intelligent, you on the other hand are insisting on sounding like a git and apparently, you take pride in it, go figure what that makes you

    337. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Define what conservative means to you? Can you even articulate you position? Or is your mind so disorganized and ill considered that you don't even know your own mind?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    338. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You're apparently utterly ignorant as to what sexism means.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      ""Sexism or gender discrimination is prejudice or discrimination based on a person's sex or gender.""

      How does saying I have balls mean I am a sexist?

      Would it be sexist for a women to say she has a vagina?

      Are you even aware of how idiotic you're sounding here?

      Log off the internet. There are more then enough halfwits on the internet without you adding to this carnival of ignorance and stupidity.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    339. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Did I tell women to go back to the kitchen or are you attempting another sad strawman argument?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    340. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No you're not attempting to sound intelligent. You're attempting to sound righteous. The effort is undermined by your depressing ignorance and provincial grasp of philosophy.

      ^^ See that? That is someone attempting to sound intelligent.

      Whether I am or not is something only intelligent people could judge. But that is not what you're trying to do. You're trying to sound morally superior. Not intelligent. And your first mistake there is assuming your morality means anything in the first place. Its just an opinion, little one. Small and irrelevant in the face of time. Your notions of good and evil are little more then talking points in an evolving system.

      What you see as moral will be seen by generations to come as immoral or ignorant. Just like every generation before.

      Think about how your grand parents or their grand parents saw the world and compare it to your own. Do you think you're more intelligent then any of them?

      If you lived long enough you'd grow to see everything you value thrown away as garbage. Once you grasp that, you look instead for the eternal truths. The philosophy beyond the transient. And in that context your sad fascination with these PC tropes are as nothing.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    341. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      All mental asylums are filled with people claiming to be awake or the only sane ones left, you seem similarly inclined...

      Also, I am not talking about conservativism in the American Republican vs Democrat context, I am talking about conservatives in the sense that they have historically opposed any change in the social structure, holding back human progress, people who thought that the problem of racism was not a problem and that the people demanding equal rights just needed thicker skins, about people who thought feudalism and mercantilism were the best social constructs ever and opposing any change towards a more liberal society, when I call you a conservative, it has nothing to do with your political affiliation (or lack of it) but with what you say and what you (apparently) believe.

      Also, when you say enemies, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean something like the /. feature or do you mean enemies in actual life? If it's the former, I don't seem to have any enemies, if its the latter, I don't actually live in the wild West, y'kno?

    342. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      I'm not an internet tough guy though... I'm just a man. Nothing special. Comes with having balls.

      Which implies that women are somehow lesser because they lack balls which as per the wiki definition is sexist.

      It would be sexist for a woman to imply that she's better then men because she has a vagina, yes.

      You do know that its this attitude, the one that you are not just displaying but also very blatantly defending, that is the problem, right? You say stuff which is demeaning without even realizing that what you've said is hurtful to others, you are a moron, the Japanese have the perfect term for you...kis-sama

    343. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Of course you don't...you are too self absorbed to notice whatever's happening around you to other people

    344. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Get it through that thick empty skull of yours, this is not about you...you are not the victim here and you are a perpetrator only because of your insistence on refusing to acknowledge that there's a problem that needs to be addressed!

    345. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1
      At least I am not trying to make myself out to be a victim unlike you...why don't you do everyone a favor and ooze back to whereever it is that you oozed from? This article was not about how you are a victim although you've made it abundantly clear that you are definitely a part of the problem.

      If you lived long enough you'd grow to see everything you value thrown away as garbage.

      Probably because it actually was garbage.

      Once you grasp that, you look instead for the eternal truths.

      Which in your case sadly means sticking to your guns and insisting that you've found some eternal truths, so tell me o wise sage, which deity visited you in thine slumber and bestowed upon thee these eternal truths that thou so vehemently spout?

    346. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Its as much about me as it is about you or that woman or anyone else.

      You wish judge and change and those judgements and changes effect everyone.

      Limit your silly little comments to something that cannot effect me and you'll find I care little for it.

      Touch upon me and I have as much right to involve myself as anyone including little fools like you.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    347. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You're really unable to parse simple logic aren't you?

      You say I am unaware but my statement concerned things I had seen or experienced. Therefore, it was a statement of awareness.

      Your comment would be more rational if you claimed I was hallucinating or something.

      Regardless, your inability to grasp simple logical concepts does little to bolster your position.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    348. Re: Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      To imply women are lessor I'd have to imply I am greater. I didn't say I was superior, you sniveling halfwit. I made a statement of identity.

      Lets say you don't eat meat. And you state that. Are you claiming that you're superior because you don't eat meat? Are you claiming people that do eat meat are inferior? No.

      you're making a statement of identity.

      It says much that you'd try to strip your supposed rivals of even the right to have an identity. You're trying to take my face away. You're attempting to claim that I have no right to opinions, no right to a personality, no right to self determination.

      And from this position you presume to be morality superior to me?

      Your grasp of morality is so shallow it doesn't merit consideration. Your whole world view is a cardboard cut out joke.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    349. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      A conservative is someone who's change-agnostic and likes to hold on to traditional values

      Throughout history conservatives have opposed any changes to the social, political and economic systems that were prevalent in their time, if it was good enough for their fathers and their forefathers, it had to be good for them.

      Most conservatives either think that they're doing some divine bidding by holding on to the values that their forebearers have left them or they are trying to (consciously or sub-consiously) protect some social, political or economic construct that is beneficial to them.

      But of course, I have no idea what a conservative is.

    350. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Yes and every deluded fanatic sees evil in the face of everyone he meets.

      What did that little bit of circular reasoning get you, halfwit?

      You bore me... you know nothing, aren't terribly clever, lack any apparent creativity, and aren't especially funny.

      You have no value to me or anyone else here. I amused myself for a time coming up with insults to throw at you. It was at least diverting. But you're too stupid to even understand most of them which spoils it.

      I won't waste any more of my time on you.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    351. Re:Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      So if social attitudes are changed where women are treated with respect, that would have a negative impact on you? Why? Because you'd be deprived of the misplaced feeling of superiority over them?

      The only way this effects you is if you regularly go stalk women, either online or in the real world or you disrespect them either intentionally or unintentionally and your fear that you would not be able to stop, is what's driving you to stupidly and stubbornly repeat the same drivel

    352. Re:Pft by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I said I wouldn't say anything more but this was just too funny...

      "change agnostic"

      What does that even mean?

      ""Agnosticism is the view that the truth values of certain claimsâ"especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, as well as other religious and metaphysical claimsâ"are unknown or unknowable.""

      So if we take that you mean "the view that certain values are unknowable"... how do I combine that concept with change?

      This appears to be mental vomit. You've got melted ice cream mixed with your masticated steak. They don't go together and make no sense in context.

      Anyway... that little pearl of stupidity had to be stunned and then transfixed to a collection board. Seriously... bravo... that was some impressively meaningless babble.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    353. Re: Pft by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

      Tsk a typo... that was change antagonistic that swipe keyboard changed to agnostic... But go on... Lacking any genuine retorts, resort to latching on to one word and prove that besides lacking any reading comprehension skills, you also lack any common sense whatsoever...

      Also, it would seem that you learned a new word thanks to that typo, good for you

    354. Re:Pft by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      The post was about comparing a woman looking at a mans strength, to a man looking at a linebackers strength. It wasn't about men being stronger than women, which is obvious.

      The claim, at least as someone else could find out, was totally false. So yes, I think scrutinizing peoples claims is extremely important.

      --
      AccountKiller
    355. Re:Pft by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Rape statistics are not hard to find. Seriously, it is not feminism's job to rehash every single moron on the interwebs that can manage to smash out the words [citation needed].

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    356. Re:Pft by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... you have to realize that women deal with unwanted sexual crap orders of magnitude above what men deal with.

      As a matter of fact, most women I know say that the vast majority of online insults they receive have some sexual tone to them. The insults are phrased in much more invasive language than most insults that men deal with.

    357. Re:Pft by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      And even outside the gaming world. I know several women that have stopped using trains/subways because of the constant sexual harassment. I have yet to meet a man that stopped using the subway/train for any type of harassment.

      Even if you can make the case that men and women get equal quantities of insults/threats/harassment in a certain environment, for some reason, the insults/threats against women are usually more intense, and always seem to be more personal, to the point that those threats begin to feel actually threatening. Like... "I think this guy might actually do X to me... this is creeping me out".

    358. Re:Pft by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      I know many women who have stopped using trains/subways because of constant harassment from random guys.
      I have yet to meet a man that stopped using the subway because he was harassed every day by random people.

  2. How do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do you defend yourself against accusations like that as a man? We are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women, can you really say thats not true without becoming another "point of proof" that they have?

    1. Re:How do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you feel you have to defend yourself against accusations like this? Have they been leveled at you?

      Perhaps if they have, you should "defend" yourself by knocking that shit off?

      I've been in the tech industry for 18 years... worked with hundreds of different women over that time. Not once have I ever felt the need to "defend myself against accusations like this." Why? Because it's pretty easy to avoid being a condescending sexist asshole, when you stop behaving like every woman is put here for the sole purpose of your sexual gratification.

    2. Re:How do you by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you defend yourself against accusations like that as a man? We are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women, can you really say thats not true without becoming another "point of proof" that they have?

      Well, the most obvious step is to distinguish between "That's not true of me" and "That's not true". The first statement(while not always accurate) is much easier to confirm or deny. Plus, you aren't immediately put in the position of having to 'win' the debate in order to lay out your own position. If you immediately conflate population-level complaints with personal complaints, you end up taking on a markedly larger and more challenging position.

      It may also be true that you suspect the harassment to be the work of a vocal and dedicated minority(and it would actually be rather interesting to see what the logs say about troll distribution in various internet locations) rather than a general thing; but you still gain nothing by tying the desire to defend yourself with the desire to defend a population.

    3. Re:How do you by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      But if you dare to express the fact that it isn't true, then you get accused of "denying reality" and being part of the problem in that sense. It's a no-win scenario.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:How do you by WarSpiteX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why does she get to stereotype men? Why do women get to put all their problems on men? When men do this, we're misogynistic. When women do this, well, men need to be more sensitive.

      --


      I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
    5. Re:How do you by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you defend yourself against accusations like that as a man?

      You don't bother. You have no obligation to respond to her complaints if you don't feel like it.

    6. Re:How do you by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why does she get to stereotype men? Why do women get to put all their problems on men? When men do this, we're misogynistic. When women do this, well, men need to be more sensitive.

      I think you have a point, but I also think you're confusing two issues.

      She may or may not be making a valid generalization. I haven't read her article, so I can't say. But issue #1 is whether or not her complaint is worth considering.

      Issue #2 is whether or not it's hypocritical for a women to paint men with a broad brush. But that issue can be treated entirely separately from issue #1.

    7. Re:How do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "A man threatened to rape my mouth with a shit-covered horse-cock this afternoon."
      "Oh you're so melodramatic. That's not even remotely true!"
      "Um, yes, it is true. Here's the post."
      "It's a fact, everything you're saying is not true."

      In your response, you're creating what's known as a straw man - "a sham argument meant to be defeated." She never said "all men everywhere are threatening to rape women!" Unfortunately, until you stop reading every article like this as if it's a personal attack, the problem will persist, too.

    8. Re:How do you by kentrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, it's a logical fallacy, called Poisoning the Well. You discredit what a person might say later by misrepresenting them now. You calmly and rationally tell them that it's a logical fallacy, and that's how you defend it.

      I remember in the old days of debating on the internet logical fallacies were referenced a lot. I remember Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit getting a lot of hits when arguments got emotional. It doesn't happen so much anymore, because there's a large influx of people making highly emotive arguments but without much discipline in reasoned arguments. They may make valid points, but when they don't you should point out the logical fallacies in their reasoning. We're all prone to logical fallacies, so it's healthy for debate overall.

    9. Re:How do you by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Incorrect. You jump to some really broad interpretation of the article really fast. Maybe this hits a little to close to your behavior?

      Women are harassed, viciously by men.
      Not all men. But it's there and people like you just turn a blind eye and use excuses to be offended at a women pointing out this issue.
      This is text messages, threats emailed to you, men send death threats that include personal informaiton, like what kind of car and location.
      And it isn't uncommon., in that every woman will experiences it often.

      "This woman thinks I'm asshole with no self-control for no other reason than because I have a penis. "
      there is nothing in the article that implies that, you are reading into it as a reason to be insulted. Because outrage is easier then trying to help.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:How do you by geekoid · · Score: 2

      She doesn't. At no point does she do that.

      Did you even read the article?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:How do you by exomondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's sexist statements like this that cause a lack of sympathy in the first place:

      One of the consequences is that men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women

      This is something that is simply not true of all men so why make statements like that? Do you really expect people to actively defend your cause if you are openly hostile to them just because of they are of the same gender as the people you have a problem with? That's a terrible start to conflict resolution.

    12. Re:How do you by exomondo · · Score: 1

      This woman thinks I'm asshole with no self-control for no other reason than because I have a penis. And she thinks I'm the one who's sexist?!

      Damn straight! Sure that sort of attitude isn't going to turn anybody sexist but it isn't exactly going to win you any friends either.

    13. Re:How do you by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This woman thinks I'm asshole with no self-control for no other reason than because I have a penis.

      I've re-read the article, and I couldn't find the part where she's talking about anything like that. Can you cite the relevant part?

    14. Re:How do you by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I've been in the tech industry for 18 years... worked with hundreds of different women over that time. Not once have I ever felt the need to "defend myself against accusations like this." Why? Because it's pretty easy to avoid being a condescending sexist asshole, when you stop behaving like every woman is put here for the sole purpose of your sexual gratification.

      That's great, I've seen men's careers destroyed because they refused the advances of a women. This includes them claiming: rape, assault, sexual harassment, stalking, peeping and several other things. Of course, as a guy you're pretty much 100% guilty, even when it isn't true. Then you're just a "guy who got off." At the end of the day there is no defense, it's game over. Even if you are innocent, and have been maliciously libeled against and even if you win the libel case, you're still screwed.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    15. Re:How do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She doesn't. At no point does she do that. Did you even read the article?

      um, did you?

      men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women.

      Many men believe women have no worth in the games industry beyond appearance.

      It’s telling that men in the gaming industry, or simply commentators, refuse to listen to the reality of these situations and try to help. They’d rather talk over women and convince themselves of a fictional reality that’s more comforting.

      There are a lot of other thinly veiled stereotypes in their as well. Such as "gamers" are this or that.

    16. Re:How do you by tysonedwards · · Score: 2

      Using terminology like "everyone" is the problem here. In these cases, there are a few outlandish instances that stand out saying "this is horrific", a few "this is bad" instances, some questionable ones that could go either way, and an incalculable number of "these are perfectly fine".

      Brianna Wu saying "every man" is just like a racist saying "every Jew", and it also makes it difficult to take what are certainly very real issues seriously. But at the same point, she was able to point to 4 problems over a long career, not "every day I show up to work and am confronted by dozens of threats of rape, torture, or other sadistic behavior by unknown random people". And yet when someone told her that under no circumstances would they ever have sex with her, even after her death she responds by being afraid to go out in public after dark. That seems more like an "anti-rape" threat or a "just leave me the hell alone, it's never gonna happen" message than one to be concerned about.

      Is she overreacting, perhaps. Are there more cases that she didn't feel inclined to mention, perhaps. Are the things that she mentioned "severe", yes. Should they be taken seriously, yes. But at the same point, they should be taken seriously against the individuals who levied those statements, not against an entire group. She accuses all men of being sexist, but in that statement she is herself showing that she herself is sexist of men and feels that she should be treated differently than any person regardless of gender.

      Workplace problems should be taken seriously, and as the leader of the studio it is her place to handle them. If she isn't willing to do so, then she can either hire someone into an HR role or take her comments to an existing HR person to let them address it instead.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    17. Re:How do you by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Why do you feel you have to defend yourself against accusations like this? Have they been leveled at you? Perhaps if they have, you should "defend" yourself by knocking that shit off?

      Well, AC, the answer to that question entirely depends on when you stopped beating your wife.

    18. Re:How do you by Smauler · · Score: 1

      One of the major problems, in this and many other articles is that there is a blanket assumption that all of this abuse is coming from men, even in the case of anonymous posts. This is straight up sexism. All of the abuse here is assumed to be the work of men.

      Before you say that it is always men, there was a similar incident of excessive abuse directed towards a female MP campaigning against a woman being removed from the 5 pound note in the UK. Two people were prosecuted, one of them was a woman (Isabella Sorley).

      I am against prosecutions for online abuse, I'm just using this as an example that it is not always men who abuse, even in situations where it would seem unlikely that it is a woman. Assuming anonymous hate mail is always written by men is wrong and sexist.

    19. Re:How do you by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

      That's a difficult question. In my office, it tends to be the women who have the most issues with being criticized by another woman. I've had my work critiqued on multiple occasions by female coworkers, both my equals and superiors, and I didn't take it personally or become defensive. Now, I can only speak for myself, rather than my entire gender (which the author of the article has done), and I am sure there are men who have issues with it. In regards to the article, what's the solution? The author lists several problems plaguing the industry, but offers no concrete resolution. I have an issue with that. If you are going to call out an issue, you need to also come prepared with a way to fix it. If you don't, no one will ever take you seriously.

    20. Re:How do you by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Why do you feel you have to defend yourself against accusations like this? Have they been leveled at you?

      Why do women assume that the comments they get need to be taken seriously? Why is one concern more valid than the other?

      Because it's pretty easy to avoid being a condescending sexist asshole, when you stop behaving like every woman is put here for the sole purpose of your sexual gratification.

      I dont view women that way either, but when someone posts a blog post saying that "Many men believe women have no worth in the games industry beyond appearance...", its pretty clear that thats meant to be aimed broadly at men. How am I supposed to respond to that?

      If there is a problem with specific people, take it up with them. The complaint here seems to be "people on the internet are jerks". Congratulations on the detective work, let me know if you come up with a solution for it. Till then, please dont level accusations so broadly.

    21. Re:How do you by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I remember Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit getting a lot of hits when arguments got emotional. It doesn't happen so much anymore, because there's a large influx of people making highly emotive arguments but without much discipline in reasoned arguments

      It doesn't happen much any more because the demographics of the net have changed. There are (proportionally) far fewer people with science backgrounds who've read that book than there used to be.

    22. Re:How do you by ruir · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is not being constructively criticised by women. The problem is their making it the plot of a movie, being melodramatic, snarky, more prone to playing mind games, and thinking they are smarter. And not liking when people cuts the crap and calls their bullshit directly.

    23. Re:How do you by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Proof is to read slashdot I think. Every time there's an article discussing women in the work place or sexism or anything like that, the troglodyte patrol comes out in force to deny it all before even reading the article. The level of defensiveness gets so thick you can actually smell it on the browser.

      Now I agree that this attitude of men not liking criticism from women is not everywhere. I've worked in several jobs with a very high percentage of women developers (medical industry) and I've worked for women several times. And things work out well, as those companies tended to be highly professional. But there are cases where you can see the few guys that just don't like women in the command chain or who ignore advice/suggestions from women.

      Ie, it's not every man, so no one needs to defend against that accusation. But since this is slashdot, it seems so many people feel they're being personally accused whenever these sorts of stories appear.

    24. Re:How do you by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of this is just the rushing to the defense of the status quo. Usually rushing so fast that there's no time to read the articles.

    25. Re:How do you by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      One of the consequences is that men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women

      This is something that is simply not true of all men so why make statements like that? Do you really expect people to actively defend your cause if you are openly hostile to them just because of they are of the same gender as the people you have a problem with? That's a terrible start to conflict resolution.

      Genius comment. I salute you.

    26. Re:How do you by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      Wow. The best, most intelligent and cogent post in a very long thread of mindless knee-jerking.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    27. Re:How do you by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. You jump to some really broad interpretation of the article really fast. Maybe this hits a little to close to your behavior?

      On the contrary, you've just proven my point!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    28. Re:How do you by ganjadude · · Score: 1
      you start with

      Women are harassed, viciously by men. Not all men

      and jump to

      And it isn't uncommon., in that every woman will experiences it often.

      Really??? EVERY single woman in the world is going to get sexually harassing texts and emails, and not only once but often??? Really geek????? really??
      you are doing exactly what you accuse the other poster of doing

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    29. Re:How do you by Boronx · · Score: 1

      You're being extremely sensitive. If you weren't you wouldn't care.

    30. Re:How do you by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Brianna Wu saying "every man" is just like a racist saying "every Jew", and it also makes it difficult to take what are certainly very real issues seriously.

      Some people would think that you put "every man" in quotation marks because it's a quotation, but it isn't. Brianna Wu does not use the phrase "every man" a single time. She doesn't claim that all men are sexist, or say anything like it, so you can safely put your righteous indignation aside.

      The biggest generalisation that she does make is saying that "it’s telling that men in the gaming industry, or simply commentators, refuse to listen to the reality of these situations and try to help" - which seems borne out by reactions like assuming her article is a sexist overgeneralisation when you clearly haven't read it.

    31. Re:How do you by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, I did a search for "every" on the page, and found no instance of "every man". I saw "many men". The only really inclusive statement I found in TFA was this:

      It’s telling that men in the gaming industry, or simply commentators, refuse to listen to the reality of these situations and try to help.

      Given the attitude of so many of the replies here, she may very well have a point.

      Are you feeling oversensitive about accusations? Why would that be?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re:How do you by shilly · · Score: 1

      Using terminology like "everyone" is the problem here ...Brianna Wu saying "every man" is just like a racist saying "every Jew"

      Except that Brianna Wu didn't say "every man" in her article. Pillock.

    33. Re:How do you by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something like this, but I couldn't say it any better than you did. +1 to you, I wish I actually had mod points for this.

    34. Re:How do you by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      WHOOOOOOOOOSH

  3. Good Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I read the piece (well, ok, half of it). The writing and arguments is pretty decent, somewhat of a rarity when dealing with this subject. However, there is no way how truly widespread the problem is, given that the sample size is 4

    1. Re:Good Article by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      A couple of anecdotes from a few troll posts do not qualify as 'daily harassment of women.'

    2. Re:Good Article by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      A couple of anecdotes from a few troll posts do not qualify as 'daily harassment of women.'

      And yet you crop up on every single slashdot sexism article (I love these articles too, great fun) and claim sexism doesn't exist. So, sure it's four this time, but you're always here denying facts in front of your face.

      At some point that turns from "rational skepticism" into rampant denialism.

      It turned that point a very, very long time ago in your case.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Invisible women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Listening, and making the industry safer for the existence of visible women is the best, and only, way forward.

    And to hell with invisible women.

  5. Occams Scalpel by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just how annoying is this person that she generates that kind of hate ?

    I have worked with/under/and above women and the only time I have ever seen anyone get this kind of reaction, male or female is when it is provoked or the people perpetrating it were a few punch cards short of a program.

    1. Re:Occams Scalpel by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I have worked with/under/and above women and the only time I have ever seen anyone get this kind of reaction, male or female is when it is provoked or the people perpetrating it were a few punch cards short of a program.

      The headline and opening doesn't make it clear, but they're specifically talking about online harassment.

      Trolls will target anything and everything about you.
      Gender just gives them extra ammunition.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Occams Scalpel by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She has death threats sent to her phone. This isn't just an internet forum issue, and it isn't just her.
      I have a daughter, she gets iot, her friends get it, I know 45 year old women who get attacked like this.

      You're attitude is a large part of the problem. You have substituted actual think with some sort of ad hom.

      It is industry wide, gaming culture wide.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Occams Scalpel by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

      Just how annoying is this person that she generates that kind of hate ?

      I have worked with/under/and above women and the only time I have ever seen anyone get this kind of reaction, male or female is when it is provoked or the people perpetrating it were a few punch cards short of a program.

      I tend to agree with you, in general. However, I do think it is disingenuous to name a company "Girlfight" in a clear attempt to cash in on their sexuality, then contribute to an article complaining about it.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    4. Re:Occams Scalpel by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      We live in a society that's insensitive to trolls in ways it doesn't understand.

      One of the consequences is that muggles are extremely sensitive when being criticized by trolls....

      that is why trolls are socialized to carefully dance around these issues, disagreeing with muggles in an extremely gentle manner.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Occams Scalpel by rabtech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just how annoying is this person that she generates that kind of hate ?

      I have worked with/under/and above women and the only time I have ever seen anyone get this kind of reaction, male or female is when it is provoked or the people perpetrating it were a few punch cards short of a program.

      Says the person who's never been publicly visible. No matter who you are, what your personality is, etc there will always be some people out there that don't like you, won't hire you, or otherwise throw negativity your way even if you've done absolutely nothing to earn their hate.

      Your reaction is what I've noticed most women get if they even gently bring something up. It's 100% complete denial and blame the messenger.

      What I can't figure out is why? I'm a guy, I'm a software developer. I like to work off data. Every single even halfway notable woman I've seen or talked to from conferences in person to online forums and Twitter all tell the same story: massive ongoing campaigns of harassment. The quantity only varies with the topic under discussion. Even the women developers I've worked with who aren't famous have multiple stories of being threatened with rape, patted on the head and dismissed in a meeting with colleagues, having their boobs grabbed at conferences, etc.

      True, this behavior may be a small group of bad apples, but by denying the problem exists at all you're enabling those bad apples to continue doing what they do. You don't need to do much to be part of the solution, just admit you're not a woman and don't actually know what women experience when other men aren't watching and that there's so much smoke from almost every single woman in tech it is highly probable there is fire.

      Seriously, why can't we just admit women catch a lot of shit just for being women in tech? No one is claiming they shouldn't catch shit for having stupid ideas or writing bad code. No one is claiming you can't ask women out or you have to be some kind of PC choir boy for fear of offending someone. What is this irrational urge to deny, deny, deny?

      --
      Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
    6. Re:Occams Scalpel by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with you, in general. However, I do think it is disingenuous to name a company "Girlfight" in a clear attempt to cash in on their sexuality, then contribute to an article complaining about it.

      That's feminism for you in a nutshell. The "skepchick" website rose to fame in no small part thanks to putting out a (artistic-ish) nude calendar of their members, and encouraging male adoration. Then once they had enough of a following, they decided it was now misogynistic for men to comment on their appearance or think of them in a sexual way. Lots of women have gained prominence by using their sexuality to their advantage, only to later go on long-winded rants about how nobody should be "objectifying" them.

    7. Re:Occams Scalpel by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      No matter who you are, what your personality is, etc there will always be some people out there that don't like you, won't hire you, or otherwise throw negativity your way even if you've done absolutely nothing to earn their hate.

      Very true. So when that happens to me, is that because of the matriarchy trying to keep my manliness in check?

      Your reaction is what I've noticed most women get if they even gently bring something up. It's 100% complete denial and blame the messenger.

      What I can't figure out is why?

      Because that's what we do when people are wrong?

      I've noticed when people bring up the idea that the holocaust never happened, they get 100% complete denial and blame the messenger. Hrm ... I wonder why.

      True, this behavior may be a small group of bad apples, but by denying the problem exists at all you're enabling those bad apples to continue doing what they do.

      Nobody is denying that the problem exists. That's the kind of absurd strawman that always ends up derailing these discussions. What people are telling you is that:

      1. Everyone gets harassed at some point. You don't see me going around talking about what an unsafe environment comicon is just because some chick grabbed my ass.
      2. Problems caused by a small subset of individuals should be dealt with INDIVIDUALLY, rather than by writing long-winded articles about how the whole system is horrible. Only an idiot attacks an entire community over the actions of a few individuals. We usually call that "bigotry".

      Seriously, why can't we just admit women catch a lot of shit just for being women in tech?

      Because it's insignificant. I've caught more flack for having a slow connection than most women catch for being women. I've seen far more men bending over backwards to help "women in tech" than I've seen trying to tear them down. Men tend to be far more cruel and destructive towards each other than they do with women. If harassment in the tech community is a problem then it's a problem for everyone, and it's absolutely ridiculous to single out women as being some special class of victim.

    8. Re:Occams Scalpel by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Your reaction is what I've noticed most women get if they even gently bring something up. It's 100% complete denial and blame the messenger.

      If you are in management and the entire office is giving you death threats, it might just be that you are doing something wrong.

      What I can't figure out is why? I'm a guy, I'm a software developer. I like to work off data. Every single even halfway notable woman I've seen or talked to from conferences in person to online forums and Twitter all tell the same story: massive ongoing campaigns of harassment.

      Your data seems to contradict other people's data that women don't like to talk about these incidents.

      True, this behavior may be a small group of bad apples, but by denying the problem exists at all you're enabling those bad apples to continue doing what they do.

      I am sorry we went from one proposition, that everyone or the vast majority were the problem, to the proposition that there are few bad apples.

      These are mutually exclusive propositions. You can't be both just a few bad apples and the entire industry at the same time.

      Seriously, why can't we just admit women catch a lot of shit just for being women in tech?

      Is there a recognizable subgroup on the planet that doesn't catch shit for being who they are ?

    9. Re:Occams Scalpel by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      And men don't get it? Jesus christ.

    10. Re:Occams Scalpel by rlh100 · · Score: 1

      You don't see it in the workplace any more, or very rarely, now that it's illegal.

      Are you a software developer? How many women programmers are on your team? What, no women on your team? Or if they are on your team they are QA or documentation people? It is not because they are not qualified. It is because most development teams are toxic to women.

      I am a sysadmin and most of the female sysadmins I have known have left the field. It is not because they can't take it. They can and dish it out as well. They just get tired of the "boy's club" attitude of their male coworkers. They kept waiting for the boys to grow into men, but then realized they probably won't.

      It takes a real MAN to own up to the fact that this harassment of women is insidious and pervasive in the tech/geek communities. But the boys will just continue to try and explain why it is the women's problem, not theirs.

    11. Re:Occams Scalpel by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Its not about being insensitive to them, any more than people are insensitive to the weather. At some point you realize that its a part of reality and its not going away. Nothing anyone can do short of a police state is going to stop people from being horrid on the internet for kicks.

    12. Re:Occams Scalpel by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      It takes a real WOMAN to own up to the fact that this harassment of men is insidious and pervasive in the tech/geek communities. But the girls will just continue to try and explain why it is the men's problem, not theirs.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    13. Re:Occams Scalpel by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      An email that included her address in the text of the email.

    14. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Very true. So when that happens to me, is that because of the matriarchy trying to keep my manliness in check?

      Please don't taint manliness. If people are trying to keep you in check then it's assholiness, not manliness.

      Seriously if you have a giant beard, a chest like a bear and chop down trees on the weekend with your massive axe, haul them back home on your shoulders then break them over your head before lighting them on fire with a welding torch, I would say that's about the most manly thing one could do and no one is going to keep that in check.

      If your "manly" actions are something someone wants to keep in check then you're almost certainly confusing manly with assholey.

      So please don't taint good, wholesome manliness[*] with whatever the hell you think manliness is.

      [*] Not that I'm claiming I'm as manly as the guy I described or anything.

      1. Everyone gets harassed at some point. You don't see me going around talking about what an unsafe environment comicon is just because some chick grabbed my ass.

      Firstly, no chick ever grabbed your ass at comic con (p 2. Problems caused by a small subset of individuals should be dealt with INDIVIDUALLY, rather than by writing long-winded articles about how the whole system is horrible. Only an idiot attacks an entire community over the actions of a few individuals. We usually call that "bigotry".

      Is it manly not to Read The Fucking Article now?

      Seriously, why can't we just admit women catch a lot of shit just for being women in tech?

      Because it's insignificant.

      OK this is special. So the evidence is now so overwhelming that you cannot continue to deny the evidence, so you now move on to claiming it's somehow "insignificant". Honestly, you argue like one of those evolution deniers.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Firstly, no chick ever grabbed your ass at comic con (p 2.

      Was meant to be: (p < 0.002)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      And men don't get it? Jesus christ.

      Moron.

      No one's claiming men don't get it at all.

      You're either a fool or a liar if you claim anyone said that.

      The claim, and it's reasonably well supported, is that women get it substnantially worse than (implicitly straight, white) men.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    17. Re:Occams Scalpel by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      It's a parody of the article.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    18. Re:Occams Scalpel by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Seriously if you have a giant beard, a chest like a bear and chop down trees on the weekend with your massive axe, haul them back home on your shoulders then break them over your head before lighting them on fire with a welding torch, I would say that's about the most manly thing one could do and no one is going to keep that in check.

      Pretty much, yeah. Though I don't actually get to grow a beard unless I'm either on leave or deployed overseas, so I guess you got me there.

      Of course, if you had a functional sense of humour you would have realized that my "manliness" comment was tongue-in-cheek. The fact that I do cut down trees with an axe and light them up with a blowtorch is just an amusing coincidence.

      Firstly, no chick ever grabbed your ass at comic con

      Sure, just go ahead and deny my experiences. Next you'll try to tell me that I deserved it because I was wearing a kilt. Victim blaming is always popular, especially when the victim is male.

      So the evidence is now so overwhelming that you cannot continue to deny the evidence, so you now move on to claiming it's somehow "insignificant".

      I've never denied the evidence. You may have me confused with a strawman you constructed. If you're going to argue with him, why address your response to me?

    19. Re:Occams Scalpel by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Supported by what you intellectual goatse, the paranoid online ravings of professional victims getting PTSD from twitter who are in fact the most privileged people to ever walk the earth?

    20. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      , so I guess you got me there.

      Seems like I did. Unless you're claiming that people are trying to stop you exhibiting that sort of manliness.

      So far you've ducked and weaved the main point about the sort of manliness you're being "prevented" from exhibiting.

      Sure, just go ahead and deny my experiences. Next you'll try to tell me that I deserved it because I was wearing a kilt. Victim blaming is always popular, especially when the victim is male.

      No, I wasn't blaming you as the victim, I was accusing you of making stuff up with high probability.

      I've never denied the evidence.

      Just dismissed it as "insignificant". Which is essentially denying it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Supported by what you intellectual goatse, the paranoid online ravings of professional victims getting PTSD from twitter who are in fact the most privileged people to ever walk the earth?

      I don't have a twitter account.

      Try again?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    22. Re:Occams Scalpel by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that the industry and gaming culture consider that acceptable behavior, or that a vocal minority of shitheads do? Extrapolating the behavior of the few and deciding the many think it's cool is of course, quite silly. Don't you think that suggesting the entire industry and all gamers have a problem is rather ad hom-y of you?

    23. Re:Occams Scalpel by werepants · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with you, in general. However, I do think it is disingenuous to name a company "Girlfight" in a clear attempt to cash in on their sexuality, then contribute to an article complaining about it.

      I don't think there's anything overtly sexual about "Girlfight". If you had a company named "Manfight" you wouldn't think of it as sexual. Plus, even if it is somehow intended to have sexual connotations - that doesn't in any way justify harassment. That's essentially the same as blaming a rape victim for dressing provocatively.

    24. Re:Occams Scalpel by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      The best thing you could do to help women in this struggle is to shut up. You are exactly the one-sided, brazenly biased overtly obtuse caricature that people have a problem with.

      You are of the opinion that nothing bad happens to men and it always happens to women. This does nothing but hurt the conversation because it's demonstrably untrue. I assure you that, as a man, I have been groped at bars, grabbed on the bus, shouted at, "objectified" and all manner of things that would be considered "sexual harassment" in the workplace if it happened to a woman. Just because it doesn't happen to you does not mean it doesn't happen. Some of us guys actually have nice asses.

    25. Re:Occams Scalpel by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You are of the opinion that nothing bad happens to men and it always happens to women.

      Nope. I'm just doubting the OP.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    26. Re:Occams Scalpel by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's anything overtly sexual about "Girlfight".

      You're wrong (NSFW): http://www.bing.com/images/sea...

      If you had a company named "Manfight" you wouldn't think of it as sexual.

      You're right. Women don't overwhelmingly tend to sexualize the image of men fighting, although there are certainly cases where they do.

      Plus, even if it is somehow intended to have sexual connotations - that doesn't in any way justify harassment. That's essentially the same as blaming a rape victim for dressing provocatively.

      I don't think it justifies sexual assault. But you cannot use sexuality to promote your brand, then complain that you're being sexualized.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    27. Re:Occams Scalpel by anyGould · · Score: 1

      However, I do think it is disingenuous to name a company "Girlfight" in a clear attempt to cash in on their sexuality, then contribute to an article complaining about it.

      What's "sexual" about Girlfight? If it was called "Guyfight" or "Dudefight", would you assume the same?

    28. Re:Occams Scalpel by werepants · · Score: 1

      They aren't complaining about being sexualized, as far as I can tell. They are complaining about being harassed. And the fact that some men get their rocks off on violence between women doesn't make the concept inherently sexual. The first page of google hits on that term include a film about a woman boxer and a women's martial arts academy.

    29. Re:Occams Scalpel by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      They aren't complaining about being sexualized, as far as I can tell. They are complaining about being harassed. And the fact that some men get their rocks off on violence between women doesn't make the concept inherently sexual. The first page of google hits on that term include a film about a woman boxer and a women's martial arts academy.

      I purposefully used Bing instead of Google, because Bing does not filter NSFW and Google does. I did that because it more accurately represents the topic at hand. Google's results, in this case, will skew towards "girlfight" being more or less innocent of innuendo, which is simply not representative of the topic at hand.

      What is the difference between being sexualized and being harassed, in this specific case? It's the difference between what I think (they want me to think about sex when I see their brand; they chose a name that would provide some level of flirtatious innuendo) and what I say (they don't want me to actually tell them I think about sex when I see their brand; they only want passive attention that furthers their own interests).

      I am in no way arguing that sexual harassment does not exist. I'm not even arguing that it isn't a huge problem in the gaming industry. I am saying that Girlfight is a poor example if the goal is to generate dialog and, eventually, change.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    30. Re:Occams Scalpel by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      public information. so??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    31. Re:Occams Scalpel by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      well played

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:Occams Scalpel by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      kate upton is one of those people right now. Talking about how she doesnt want to be seen as a sex symbol, yet poses nude for SI (body paint)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    33. Re:Occams Scalpel by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Every single even halfway notable person I've seen or talked to from conferences in person to online forums and Twitter all tell the same story: massive ongoing campaigns of harassment

      FTFY

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    34. Re:Occams Scalpel by werepants · · Score: 1

      We'll have to agree to disagree, I suppose. I am not familiar with the organization, they are apparently a podcast done by the women on IGN's staff, where they discuss games from a female perspective. That does not sound remotely sexual to me. The visual scheme on their homepage is a boxing glove and some stylized text. This is a podcast aimed at women - I don't think there's any reason to believe they are using sexual innuendo to titillate their target audience.

      If anything, the fact that you feel the term is sexualized kind of supports their point - it is difficult for females to participate in this industry as equals.

    35. Re:Occams Scalpel by Almonday · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, we need more adults on here. (Emotional, if not chronological.)

      --
      Posterity, my posterior.
    36. Re:Occams Scalpel by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You are of the opinion that nothing bad happens to men and it always happens to women.

      Nope. I'm just doubting the OP.

      You are doubting the OP solely on the basis that the OP is a male, since that's the only information you have about him. That only makes sense if you're of the opinion that nothing bad ever happens to men.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    37. Re:Occams Scalpel by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Okay, suppose a woman sexually assaults me by grabbing my ass. In almost all cases, I don't have to take an unarmed woman seriously as a physical threat. I'm not a good fighter, but I'm a lot bigger than most women, and size counts here.

      Now, suppose I sexually assault a woman by grabbing her ass. In general, she does have to take that as a serious threat, since I am probably capable of overpowering an unarmed woman*. (It's also easier to sexually assault a woman with a grab, as grabbing her boobs counts and grabbing my chest doesn't.)

      There is a disparity here that we need to take into account.

      *Probability is estimate only, not based on data, like 68.3% of all statistics quoted on the Net.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    38. Re:Occams Scalpel by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing the point. The claim in TFA is that a sufficient number of real assholes exist to make women's lives miserable, and that most men don't take it seriously or do anything to help. That is entirely consistent.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    39. Re:Occams Scalpel by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing the point. The claim in TFA is that a sufficient number of real assholes exist to make women's lives miserable, and that most men don't take it seriously or do anything to help. That is entirely consistent.

      That's because it's a non point. There are enough real assholes to make everyone's life miserable.I am still not clear if she is complaining about office behavior or gamer/forumite behavior but either way there's big reality checks she isn't cashing.

      If she is talking about office behavior what she is describing is completely mind bogglingly unbelievable. You could be the Axeman( oh lets be PC Axeperson) letting go an entire office/branch/corporate subentity and not get the kind of blowback she is talking about.

      If you are talking about gamers/game forums, lol welcome to internet gaming. I can't count how many times I have had people tell me they would rip off my head and shit down my neck.

      So when you say men don't take it seriously, you might want to add that men don't take it seriously when it's directed at them as well.

      Speaking of Reality checks, I decided to do one, https://www.google.com/search?...

      You know how many news results actually had gamers assaulting or attacking developers ?
      NONE !!!!!
      NONE !!!
      NONE !!!

      If this woman is actually concerned about her safety it's likely she would be thousands times more effective, campaigning to improve driver education and road safety in her community.

    40. Re:Occams Scalpel by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      She's complaining neither about office nor game/forum stuff. She's complaining about people who go the extra mile to grief effectively and personally. Things like personal emails that sometimes show that the sender has done research useful in committing the crimes he threatens. I am mostly unfamiliar with trash talk in gaming; do the assholes typically get personal, detailed, and specific while sending hate mail to personal email accounts and websites to men?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    41. Re:Occams Scalpel by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Typically ?
      How would anyone determine that ?

      At this point we are into the realm of making crap up, I will stand by the fact that googling for news about violent incidents perpetrated on game developers by gamers yielded exactly 0 results. So when someone says "They are in fear for their lives" from gamers they might as well be claiming they live in fear of Sharknadoes.

    42. Re:Occams Scalpel by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      There is a disparity here that we need to take into account.

      You haven't demonstrated a disparity. Assault is assault regardless of whether some guy thinks it should be taken seriously or not.

      It's also easier to sexually assault a woman with a grab, as grabbing her boobs counts and grabbing my chest doesn't.

      Why?

  6. Feminists have gone overboard... by MindPrison · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    We live in a society that's sexist in ways it doesn't understand. One of the consequences is that men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women. ... This is why women are socialized to carefully dance around these issues...

    What's there not to understand? Women wants EQUAL rights in just about anything that makes a MAN a MAN! In Sweden we're officially so feminist now that we even have a Feminist Political Party (FI - Feminist Initiative).

    With all due respect and apologies to all women that has been harassed in any way anywhere by stupid and insecure individuals - I have to say I', FED UP with this feminist battle over the sexes that these days have gone WAY OVERBOARD. Women wants equal rights, but get maternity leave with FULL pay too. They want to leave 5'o clock when they're finished at work, but get paid as a man who works until the job is DONE.

    Women wants to be treated like a woman - and still be equal to men. What happened to treating a MAN like a MAN? We were created DIFFERENTLY and we should APPRECIATE our differences, this doesn't mean it's harassment, but thanks to the absolutely out-of-proportion nagging about Female Rights in the media every day and every hour on every newsmedia that we can think of - it has made me somewhat biased AGAINST women whom I used to care so much about.

    For that reason alone, I'm not even married. I don't want to - the women of today resemble men!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For that reason alone, I'm not even married.

      Yes, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it's not for the reason you posit.

    2. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ...

      I'm very flattered by that comparison, but I'm sure the other sex would have something else to say about that...

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    3. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That was the most misogynistic thing in this comments so far, well done.
      Coupled with that, it shows a complete lack of understanding he issue and the article.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      That was the most misogynistic thing in this comments so far, well done. Coupled with that, it shows a complete lack of understanding he issue and the article.

      Good, better than being a dyslectic apologist with inferiority issues. What part of being a man did you not get?

      ...oh wait!

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    5. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by narcc · · Score: 1

      Women wants to be treated like a woman - and still be equal to men

      How dare they demand equality!

    6. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Apparently, your self-worth as a man requires women groveling at your feet. That's pretty sad and pathetic.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    7. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by shilly · · Score: 1

      Mis-spelling dyslexic as you angrily insult someone -- priceless humour, thank you!

    8. Re:Feminists have gone overboard... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Mis-spelling dyslexic as you angrily insult someone -- priceless humour, thank you!

      er-hm...yes, that's why...if you click on my profile...it says "Comedian" under my achievements, I guess that one was kind of involuntary, but I'll take what I can get. *smacks head*.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  7. Limited perspective by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the small sample of these accounts I've read, I get the sense that the women in question have a limited perspective. My impression is that in many cases, they encounter career or workplace challenges, and falsely assume that only women have those challenges.

    Balancing work and family responsibilities? Please, do you know how many days I've left work after sunset and nearly cried for not having that time with my little kids?

    Getting criticized harshly? Shoot, I deal with that often. I just don't blog about it. What I do is go home, try to shake it off, and maybe talk to my wife about how it's bothering me. I don't cry about it, and maybe this is a guy thing, but I cry almost never. But that doesn't mean it doesn't bother me.

    And then there are some complaints which seem more about personal choices than about unfairness. I don't come across many good, female software engineers. You know what else I rarely come across? Female aspiring software engineers who spend their nights hacking away at code to improve their skills.

    Now I have no doubt that some challenges really are unique to being a female developer. Sexual harassment is probably the top one. But that issue kind of gets drowned out of the conversation given all of the kvetching that some women have regarding other issues that they wrongly assume are peculiar to them.

    1. Re:Limited perspective by seebs · · Score: 2

      See, you're complaining that they don't know what your experiences are like. But you don't know what theirs are like, and given how you talk about it, you certainly aren't spending time talking to people to learn enough that you could make the comparison.

      You know what I rarely come across? Aspiring software engineers, at all, period. I mean, I'm not in college. It doesn't come up.

      But given the level of overt hostility women encounter, my first explanation for an apparent shortage of "good female software engineers" would be that the people who would have been good at it left because they wanted to have a job where people didn't habitually harass them.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    2. Re:Limited perspective by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Getting criticized harshly? Shoot, I deal with that often.

      My first boss said, "I don't think I would respect a programmer if he couldn't insult my code." Insulting each other is part of being a programmer.........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Limited perspective by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      My first boss said, "I don't think I would respect a programmer if he couldn't insult my code." Insulting each other is part of being a programmer

      Um no.

      I've had to give some very harsh advice before. Along the lines of "you've wasted the last year and a half of your life and there's nothing salvagable here".

      It was hard to do, but I never resorted to insults.

      I went through in a lot of detail what I thought the problems were and how he needed to go about doing things differently to avoid the same problems in the future.

      It was ultimately very harsh criticism and there was no way to sugar coat it, but outright insulting someone is completely unnecessary.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Limited perspective by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      lol

      "you've wasted the last year and a half of your life and there's nothing salvagable here". It was hard to do, but I never resorted to insults.

      you use a different definition of insulting than I do

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Limited perspective by HBI · · Score: 1

      Nothing exemplifies the beta male mindset like mod points!

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    6. Re:Limited perspective by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      you use a different definition of insulting than I do

      I doubt it. That was the gist of it and what the underlying meaning was, but certainly not what I said. My point is you can say that sort of thing without insulting someone.

      For example (chosen because lack of testing annoys me):

      Criticism without insults: There is no testing of sub algorithms, so as it stands there is no way to tell if the bad results you're getting are due to a bad assumptions being made or a bug in the algorithm.

      Insults: your code is shit and you're a moron for writing no fucking tests.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Limited perspective by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      My point is you can say that sort of thing without insulting someone.

      Well, LtR because I never said anything about insulting someone.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Limited perspective by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Well, LtR because I never said anything about insulting someone.

      Fine, their code, whatever.

      You can say bad things about something withour resorting to insults.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Limited perspective by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Not to undermine your point, but where is this: "job where people didn't habitually harass them"? I've supported several industries and I don't know that I could chart a course for my daughter to have a career "safe" from this.

    10. Re:Limited perspective by anyGould · · Score: 1

      My first boss said, "I don't think I would respect a programmer if he couldn't insult my code." Insulting each other is part of being a programmer.........

      Did he then post your home address online, and tell you he'd come over and assault you? That you're only use in life is as a pretty face to satisfy him?

      No? Then it's not really in the same category, is it.

      I've had (and delivered) crushing insults to work. Never felt the need to personally threaten anyone. (And I've had exactly *one* supervisor threaten my physically. Once. And I never worked with them again.)

    11. Re:Limited perspective by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Did he then post your home address online, and tell you he'd come over and assault you? That you're only use in life is as a pretty face to satisfy him?

      That's not a very common workplace situation......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Limited perspective by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between "Your code is crappy. How did you ever get a job as a programmer?" and "Your code is crappy. I'm going to show up at your house sometime and commit a very serious violent felony on you.". Insult my code all you want. I'll either figure you're full of BS, or I'll improve my code. I'd rather not get threats of violence.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Re:Need to ask the proper questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one deserves to be sexually harassed. End of story.

  9. The problem is the other way round... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is the other way round. Women are being socialised to constantly challenge men, and believe their opinion must always be heard and respected. And if it's not heard or disagreed with, it's sexist. Men understand that there is a certain pecking order and know how to engage correctly to get their view heard. And guess what? That means we need to share our opinions in a gentle manner too. More and more women expect men to act like their partner would toward them. That's not how it works, it's a dog eats dog world and in business, it's the modern jungle. We are all motivated by selfish desires whether we admit it or not, women just want to get a leg over like any one else, but cry sexist when they are pushed down (from other people who are also trying to rise to the top. There is no place for socialism in the work place. It's hierarchical like it or not.

    1. Re:The problem is the other way round... by MindPrison · · Score: 2

      The problem is the other way round. Women are being socialised to constantly challenge men, and believe their opinion must always be heard and respected. And if it's not heard or disagreed with, it's sexist. Men understand that there is a certain pecking order and know how to engage correctly to get their view heard. And guess what? That means we need to share our opinions in a gentle manner too. More and more women expect men to act like their partner would toward them. That's not how it works, it's a dog eats dog world and in business, it's the modern jungle. We are all motivated by selfish desires whether we admit it or not, women just want to get a leg over like any one else, but cry sexist when they are pushed down (from other people who are also trying to rise to the top. There is no place for socialism in the work place. It's hierarchical like it or not.

      Ain't that the truth! And just to make the deal even sweeter - women here in Scandinavia (Denmark, Sweden and Norway) are now FORCING businesses to employ women in order to achieve a 50-50 balance between men and women in leading positions and the rest of the workforce as well. If they don't abide by this, they can get FINED.

      I don't even want to start my own business in Sweden or Denmark just because of this. My former employer in Denmark almost went bankrupt when 4 of the 10 employees he had wanted to take out maternity leave at the same time and he had to (by LAW) pay them for 10 months scot-free, gratis for nothing!

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    2. Re:The problem is the other way round... by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I completely believe in equality and when I was in management I put that into practice all the time, no fail. Equality meant I didn't care if you were male or female, or whatever color or race or religion or ... whatever. I didn't care; I would treat you fairly, try to know you as an individual with individual needs, goals, and aspirations, and to try to help you to succeed.

      This worked. In spades. In productivity, retention, morale, health and safety, any measure you want.

      What I did not do is somehow say that equality means men (or any other group) are inferior. White male? Whatever. Black female? Whatever. You're all as good as your job performance, not more or less.

      What I seem to hear from some, though, is that a straight white male is by definition inferior. How does that align with a notion of equality?

      Of course harrassment of women is wrong! It should never be tolerated. But harrassment of anyone is wrong, and is equally unacceptable.

    3. Re:The problem is the other way round... by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      I definitely see your point. I do think that maternity/paternity leave should be granted and paid for, however, it should not be shouldered by the individual business, but by the tax payer base as a whole. I also believe in free education and medical care.

      This is not what everyone wants, and çertainly is not the American way. I am a long term capitalist, who believes that those in power do have a social responsibility to not blight their surroundings and the people that work for them. The main problem with being a long term capitalist is that too many people equate capitalism to short term thinking. Why think long term? In the long term we're dead anyway.

      But what legacy are you leaving behind?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:The problem is the other way round... by seebs · · Score: 2

      None of this is at all true. Go look at actual research data on things like how much people interrupt and get interrupted, or how likely people are to react to something someone says.

      Most women who are in professional environments have had the experience where they propose a course of action, and people ignore them and keep talking, and then some guy proposes the same exact course of action, and everyone agrees with it, and concludes that the guy had the idea. Watch carefully in meetings and you can see it too. It's sort of magical.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    5. Re:The problem is the other way round... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      *counts Disney films with princess* *checks dates*

      Um....you might want to try that again. This'd be more like the third such generation, if not the fourth.

    6. Re:The problem is the other way round... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The problem is the other way round.

      So... the problem is that public men in the gaming community get constant stalking, harassment, rape and dheath threats from women?

      No, you're instead going to go off rambling on a tangent that is almost but not quite unrelated to the article. Well done for writing an utterly pointless post.

      Actually it's not pointless. Someone points out how there's this problem with certain women being treated badly by a number of guys and your first response is to go on the attack against all women and jump to the defense of all men.

      I think you might bery well be part of the problem.

      Women are being socialised to constantly challenge men, and believe their opinion must always be heard and respected.

      Yeah maybe on planet opposite. Clearly you don't actually have any young relatives so you can observe how socialisation actually works.

      Men understand that there is a certain pecking order and know how to engage correctly to get their view heard.

      Al yes, the all men versus all women sort of argument. Right.

      More and more women expect men to act like their partner would toward them.

      What the fuck does that even mean? I imagine you also have a perverse idea about how partners act towards each other too. You certainly do not know how me and my partner interact.

      There is no place for socialism in the work place.

      Reality (and employment law) disagrees with you. The world has got a substantially better place since employers started getting regulated. I, for one, do not want to return to Victorian London.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:The problem is the other way round... by Builder · · Score: 1

      Most women who are in professional environments have had the experience where they propose a course of action, and people ignore them and keep talking, and then some guy proposes the same exact course of action, and everyone agrees with it, and concludes that the guy had the idea. Watch carefully in meetings and you can see it too. It's sort of magical.

      Most guys have had that happen too.

  10. Re:No, she doesn't. by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ya I think the problem is that forums bring out people who say some truly terrible things, and there isn't really much you can do about it. They say stuff to men too - but it's more death threats than sexist, and they say racist things to (or about) blacks and jews, muslims, latinos, and the chinese too.

    The perils of anonymity I suppose.

    It's not like it isn't a valid concern that people are out saying these things, but jews and blacks essentially face the same problem: if you go and look at a few hundred or a few thousand internet comments on any post there will be a couple of things that are basically just crazy people rambling. Unfortunately you don't know when random crazy people rambling on forums are actually a threat (if ever), and that they exist and want to say those things at all is a bit of an existential threat to your general day to day existence.

    There isn't really an obvious prescription. You can educate people all you want about not saying offensive things, but a small handful of people will continue to say offensive things because they're trying to be offensive. And the anonymity of the internet lets you say both unpopular things which are valid, and unpopular things which are just nonsense.

  11. Re:Fuck off back to tumblr with this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What about female nerds? And male nerds that actually give a damn about what women think and how women are treated?

  12. Not entirely relevant... by devphaeton · · Score: 2

    But one of the silliest things I've ever experienced when gaming online was a (probably teenaged) female telling me that she was sodomizing my mom with a strap-on. Over and over again. Or another telling me that if I was her kid she'd have aborted me with a crowbar.

    The Internet brings out the best in everyone!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  13. And seeing the reactions so far... by quintesse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And seeing the reactions so far not much is going to change about this shit. Disappointingly few people are even willing to entertain the possibility that the story might actually be true. Only coming up with excuses, bogus counter-examples ("I'm a guy who knows some women and I've never seen this happen") or just outright hatred and scorn. Way to go guys!

    1. Re:And seeing the reactions so far... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      It is valid to answer anecdote with anecdote.

    2. Re:And seeing the reactions so far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you genuinely get threatened, and think you have a case, go to the police.

      We're not the police.

      And we don't believe a word of the murder epidemic that this article is trying to push, because it doesn't pan out in real life.

      There isn't an epidemic of gamer murders.

      It's bullshit. You're pushing bullshit.

    3. Re:And seeing the reactions so far... by doctor+woot · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the petulance of some of the comments here (there's no point addressing them) the reception the article got isn't entirely unreasonable. Wu speaks with an undeserved sense of authority, comes across as a smug supremacist hand waving away criticism. She uses the article as a platform to broadcast her frustrations and masquerades it as a piece on culture. She can decide not to take her audience seriously if she likes, but sulking over the response is demanding you have your cake and eat it, too.

    4. Re:And seeing the reactions so far... by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This acticle has 742 comments and counting on Slashdot in less than 24 hours. Clearly there's a problem if it's creating this much debate.

    5. Re:And seeing the reactions so far... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i think most people here believe the stores can be and probably are true.

      the difference is we dont have sand in our vaginas

      whoops, someones gonna call that sexist now....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  14. Sadly, not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had the misfortune of working with many ex-videogame developers in my line of work. These people were basically uncivilized and reminded me of the mindset of what LAN parties were like back in the 90s when I was a teenager. Racism, sexism, ageism, profanity, and behavior that made you embarrassed to be around them in public. That kind of thing was funny when I was 16, but we were all immature then. It's very disturbing to see adults carry on like that.

    Don't get me wrong, that industry has also created some very hard-working, kind people that I feel truly blessed to have had the fortune to work with. But those types are hard to come by, and the out of control manchild is all too common. A few of the most vitriolic, passive-aggressive trolls I've known were former EA prodigies (their words, along with every other kind of self-adulation you can think of) and they absolutely thought they walked on water. They'd show up to work drunk, or high, and brag to everyone about how much weed they smoked or how they partied all night. There was no self control and it spilled over into mistreating their peers.

    There's a very sharp divide between the kind of people that go into games programming and all other programmers, and it's entirely about maturity, and at least in my experience it's uniquely American.

  15. Proof? by aoism · · Score: 1

    Not to say that I don't think some of this stuff goes on and that BOTH sexes aren't harassed, but in the article I didn't see a single instance that they had audio, video, or e-mail proof of their alleged harassment. There was a video of a troll flaming someone over a different of opinions in JRPGs but as anyone who has spent more than 5 minutes on Xbox Live, you know that this is the internet we live on. Just last night I was told I was going to be raped, along with my mother, for beating someone in a fighting game.

    As a man who has been falsely accused of attempted rape by an attention-seeker in the past, I implore everyone to provide proof of their allegations , and to demand proof from others, before labeling it as a systemic issue. I don't enjoy being falsely accused of rape, and I don't enjoy being falsely stuck in to a harasser category because I work in tech and have a penis but won't label myself a 'feminist'. Furthermore, I feel that articles like this with claims but no evidence will just make people shy away from hiring Women for fear they are going to start claiming harassment when there is none.

    1. Re:Proof? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Just last night I was told I was going to be raped, along with my mother, for beating someone in a fighting game. "
      Did they text that to your person phone? Did they tell you they are going to kill o and include the make and model of your car?
      No? probably not the same thing then.

      "you know that this is the internet we live on"
      Maybe we should try to make it better? nah, lets just give up and shrug our shoulders.

      " I implore everyone to provide proof of their allegations"
      I agree. It's critical.

      "before labeling it as a systemic issue.
      it is a systemic issue, and it's pretty well documented. There is a difference between A threat, and a systemic issue of threats within a community.

      "and I don't enjoy being falsely stuck in to a harasser category because I work in tech and have a penis but won't label myself a 'feminist'."
      knee jerk much? no one is doing that, get over yourself.

      " Furthermore, I feel that articles like this with claims but no evidence will just make people shy away from hiring Women for fear they are going to start claiming harassment when there is none."
      did you read the article? Nothing in your post seems to indicate you did.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Let's draw a distinction here... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll admit I was a little relieved after actually reading the article. I assumed it was talking about harassment of male game developers towards female coworkers, which would have really surprised me. I've worked in the industry for over fifteen years, and I've never even heard of any sort of sexism toward the women that were employed alongside me. It simply wouldn't have been tolerated at the places I've worked, so far as I know, and that's a good thing. While the programming department was, of course, largely male, the other departments (art, design, writing, production) were more evenly split. Everyone I've known has valued talent and hard work, and gender was pretty much an afterthought, at least so far as I could tell. Then again, I'm a guy, so I'm probably not quite as attuned to that sort of thing.

    In fact, the article seems to be mostly about women (largely in the gaming press) interacting with the still-all-too-ugly disposition of the anonymous hoards of gaming fans that interact with them. That made a bit more sense to me, unfortunately, as such women are by nature already public figures, and will probably attract a lot more bile. Let's face it. People on the internet, including (especially?) gamers, are not only sexist, they're racist, homophobic, and unbelievably cruel at time. I care a lot about the gaming culture and community, and it pains me to admit this. There's a shocking disconnect between what would be acceptable in real life versus what's said online. I'd imagine very few of those idiots would ever have the courage to say those things to someone's face.

    The only way to deal with this is absolute zero tolerance policies, at least on forums (literal or otherwise) that you have any control over. There's simply no excuse for this sort of behavior. The internet could really stand to collectively grow up a little, and realize that being anonymous shouldn't give you a free license to be an asshat. Frankly, I don't think that "normal" people turn into foul-mouth talking assholes when online and anonymous. My feeling is that they were assholes to begin with, but just didn't have the courage to say those things to anyone's face. These folks are not going to go away, I'm sorry to say. It would be nice if human nature could evolve a bit. But that doesn't mean anyone has to put up with this sort of shit any more than necessary. I'm also sorry to say that as a man, I'm pretty sure I'll never understand how a woman feels when she goes through something like this, and it makes me angry that so many would have to.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:Let's draw a distinction here... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with your premise that assholes are assholes, though, and yes, I've met my share of them (there are plenty of middle-class and rich assholes too, in case you missed it). But I think a much smaller percentage of assholes have the courage to say nasty things right to someone's face, on the record, and with the possibility of immediate retaliation. If the only think that keeps their piehole shut is the possible consequences, legal or otherwise, that's fine by me.

      Oh, and for what it's worth, anti-sexism laws haven't changed how "middle-class people view women". The laws are just a reflection of changing mores in society. I'd say you've got cause and effect reversed. The majority of people collectively decided it was no longer acceptable to sexually harass co-workers/underlings and later dismiss it with a wink and nod. Seriously, read some of the shit these women have had to put up with. There's no goddamn excuse for that - none at all. And I'm not going to excuse it no matter what someone's social or economic position is. And fuck anyone else who tries to excuse it for any reason, because they're part of the problem as well.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Let's draw a distinction here... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Of course it is assholes acting out. That's what happens when you remove consequences. Games have been an excellent example of that in terms of gameplay and mechanics. There have been games that have tried the whole "No rules but what the players make, they'll work out a stable system." No, actually it devolves in to a bunch of griefer assholes, and everyone else leaves. These people can't do that kind of thing in real life because they'd face consequences.

      Sociopaths learn to moderate their behaviour in the real world because if they don't, they get punished. Online, they can run rampant and so they do.

    3. Re:Let's draw a distinction here... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      In fact, the article seems to be mostly about women (largely in the gaming press) interacting with the still-all-too-ugly disposition of the anonymous hoards of gaming fans that interact with them

      Exactly. This entire article is basically along the lines of "I'm a woman, and I have received some very nasty insulting text via means of email, Twitter, or whatever. Some of it used terms that could only be directed at females." Look, these women need to learn how to ignore non-credible rape and assault threats. Does anyone have a single example of one such woman actually being raped or assaulted by an internet troll, you know, in real life?

      The only way to deal with this is absolute zero tolerance policies, at least on forums (literal or otherwise) that you have any control over.

      No, the way to deal with it is to teach these women how to ignore people on the internet and/or grow a thicker skin. I learnt pretty quickly - the hard way - to ignore people who were acting like dicks on the internet, within a year of starting to use it. I mastered that pretty well. These women don't seem to want to bother with that. By all means, give people the power to easily ignore someone (I'm sure it already exists on most services) but I wouldn't go down the "zero tolerance" route. Who's going to be deciding what's unacceptable speech? Feminists and social justice warriors, and ANY criticism of them they decide they don't like will be collateral damage of this aggressive censorship. People need to learn to get over things.

      And for fuck's sake Slashdot, stop equating internet trolling to credible "daily harrassment of woman" - that makes it sound a lot more serious than it really is.

  17. Re:No, she doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now she has five.

    Thank you for your contribution.

  18. Don't feed the trolls? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    I actually thought this was going to be some real world experiences, and not "Someone on the internet called me a cunt!", "Someone on the internet said they'd rape me!"

    If you make your unpopular opinion known to the world online, expect people who disagree to come out and attack you. Expect more people to come out when they know you'll make a big stink about it. The main thing they're looking for is a reaction, that's just how the internet works, people can hind behind their computers and make all the threats they want and some people find joy in getting these responses from people. I was really looking forward to an article describing real world instances where people made these comments and threats. Not that I want to see that happen, but at least that's something that can be corrected when brought to light, the only way to stop trolls is to stop feeding them.

  19. And the result of all this? by Loopy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You wonder why we have so much dysfunction going on today?

    Pervasive culture of butthurt = CHECK
    Any perceived insult is by default true = CHECK
    Special protected classes that can do no wrong = CHECK
    Litigious society causing zero tolerance including honest mistakes = CHECK
    Rampant immaturity = CHECK
    General abdication of personal responsibility = CHECK

    Let's pose a hypothetical, here. Let's say you (Linda, a woman) work for a company A. A has Big Boss, Linda, Tom, Fred and David as employees. The four of you report to Big Boss.

    Situation A: Tom says something mean to Fred. Fred tells Tom to go fuck himself. Big Boss hears about it and calls them both into his office. Big Boss tells Tom to square his shit away or he's fired. Big Boss admonishes Fred to come see him about this in the future rather than responding in kind. Tom and Fred go on about their work and are a bit more careful about their interactions. This is a regular thing for Tom as he's brilliant but a loose cannon verbally. Big Boss talks to Tom and admonishes him that if he can't keep his asshole comments to himself, he will end up fired with prejudice.

    Situation B: Linda says something mean to Fred. Fred tells Linda she can go fuck herself. Other employees hear the latter half of the exchange. Linda goes to Big Boss and complains about Fred using foul language around her. Big Boss calls them both into the office. Linda tells her story and Big Boss asks her to return to her desk. Big Boss then lectures Fred about the sensitivities of women in the workforce and how the small company cannot afford to defend against a "workplace harassment" lawsuit. Fred complains that Linda started the whole thing. Big Boss says it won't matter because a jury will default rule in favor of the woman because of articles like the above. Fred points out that justice is supposed to be blind. Big Boss points out that in cases of harassment, lay-wisdom holds that when women harass men, the men need to grow a pair, but when men harass women, it is only right and proper to expect better decorum out of the men. Big Boss never says anything to Linda because it could be construed as the abuse of power in a workplace environment.

    Now, you may laugh at this but these are actual shit storms I've seen happen. The problem is that while most women aren't self-entitled whiners and most men are not adolescent assholes, we can't catch a break because the lawyers and bean-counters won't let a manager fire the shit out of someone just for being a prick/cunt. As George Takei said, we've reduced ourselves to the lowest common denominator of butthurt.

    1. Re:And the result of all this? by phorm · · Score: 2

      So for (b), if Linda is consistenly a serious issue, then Fred reports it. If he reports it multiple times and it isn't dealt with, then he sues the company for harassment.
      Literally telling Linda to go f*** herself isn't really a winning response in any situation.

    2. Re:And the result of all this? by rlh100 · · Score: 1

      Situation A: Tom says something mean to Fred. Fred tells Tom to go fuck himself. Big Boss hears about it and calls them both into his office. Big Boss tells Tom to square his shit away or he's fired. Big Boss admonishes Fred to come see him about this in the future rather than responding in kind. Tom and Fred go on about their work and are a bit more careful about their interactions. This is a regular thing for Tom as he's brilliant but a loose cannon verbally. Big Boss talks to Tom and admonishes him that if he can't keep his asshole comments to himself, he will end up fired with prejudice.

      Except that unless Tom had something equally offensive to Fred, then the Big Boss tells Fred to square his shit away or he will be reported to HR. And HR if it has any smarts at all will look this very seriously. If Tom did say something equally offensive, then the Big Boss will tell them both the same message. If the Big Boss does not take this seriously, then he has just dropped the companies pants for a big lawsuit.

    3. Re:And the result of all this? by rp · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but you are discussing a different issue. The article is about worse kinds of threats than "go fuck yourself" and it is not about workplace behavior.

    4. Re:And the result of all this? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In your first example, Fred went on about his work. In the second example, Fred was being a jerk by arguing with Big Boss saying it wasn't his fault, Linda started the whole thing. Do you see the difference between the two? Why did Fred make it a point to continue complaining? Why is Fred such a whiner?

    5. Re:And the result of all this? by zenasprime · · Score: 1

      1. this isn't what the article is about at all.

      2. it's complete bullshit and doesn't actually happen.

      3. I'm a cis gendered white male.

  20. Re:Tit for tat by geekoid · · Score: 1

    if you 'have' to do something with your girlfriend, then maybe you should find someone else?
    I don't understand this stupid idea that a spouse can't enjoy something the other spouse does if for nothing more then to share in their enjoyment.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Online trolls, really? by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this what we've come to? Pretending online trolls are a problem specifically for women?

    Here's a hint for the author of that article: Trolls are adept at identifying that which will get under your skin, and will hit that button repeatedly as long as it keeps spitting out a pellet ( much like this article ). If we're going to generalize it, men don't get this particular brand of trollling because it doesn't work on us. Ultimately, it has very little to do with sexism.

    But no; let's work on trying to make ourselves a better brand of troll. Let me know how that works out for you.

    ( and no; had the author been a man, I'd have responded in the same manner )

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Online trolls, really? by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      ...and that's why I think the UK approach to take away the protection of anonymity is the right way to do it. Being sheltered by layers of anonymity and remoteness gives people a false sense of security. If they spoke like that on a personal face-to-face basis they'd be either shunned by their peers, have their noses bloodied, sent down for harassment, get a court order or in extreme cases spend some time courtesy of the state. It may be true that trolls go for the soft spot. But in these cases what they say is actually actionable and not acceptable. This is not freedom of speech issue, either...

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:Online trolls, really? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Are there things that trolls can say to you that make you scared to go outside? Do trolls send you death threats? Do trolls even bother the waste the time figuring out what your real home address is so that they can scare the bejeezus out of you? I don't think so. So why do the trolls do this to women? I don't see this as equal trolling here. Either they need to lighten up on the women or a hell of a lot more men need to be freaked out by the trolls.

  22. This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    men say this stuff to other men all the time.

    You don't think men call other men bitches, cunts, etc in games? The abuse is pretty common.

    The difference here as usual is that women expect to be treated differently. They don't think that's what they want but it is actually what they want.

    And I'm okay with treating women better. However, if that's the new rule, then women need to acknowledge it. That's the only price. If women so much as acknowledge that men are treating them with kid gloves it short circuits most of the PC equality arguments.

    As it should.

    If women don't want that and want to be treated equal... then fine... but that means not complaining when you're treated like a man. Which is going to mean getting cussed out by people that will LAUGH at you when you cry. People that will show you ZERO pity when you break down. People that will if anything hold you in contempt for being so weak.

    Are you prepared for that ladies? If so... game on.

    If not... completely fine. But then we're playing by the old rules of male/female relations. Which means you're just a girl.

    We've seen this PC crap try to gain purchase in the tech community for years. Linus Thorvald recently got told to be nicer women and that he shouldn't cus out people that he thinks are doing a crappy job.

    He told her that she wasn't tolerating his culture and his way of doing things... and that he wasn't going to change anything.

    I'll hold the same position here for the same reasons. If the girls want to be treated like girls then that's fine. If they want to be treated like men, that's fine. But stop trying to eat your man cake and have your girl perks too. Its either/or.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Which is going to mean getting cussed out by people that will LAUGH at you when you cry. People that will show you ZERO pity when you break down. People that will if anything hold you in contempt for being so weak.

      I think the goal is to not treat anyone like that.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by phorm · · Score: 1

      The difference here as usual is that women expect to be treated differently

      The difference is that people pay more attention when it's not a random white male complaining. Seriously, I could do without that shit too, but when I complain about it, I'm a whiner. When a woman complains about it, it's a potential gender-discrimination issue. Ya know what though, if women can clean that shit up - at the very least so that 20+ men aren't acting like 12-yr-old boys - hopefully it will improve things for everybody. That sounds fine to me.

      I'm fine with the occasional noob or "you suck", but some people really seem to take being offensive as their goal in life, to the point where the only thing they seem to want is to make everyone else have a shitty time.

    3. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by rlh100 · · Score: 2

      If women don't want that and want to be treated equal... then fine... but that means not complaining when you're treated like a man.

      Maybe being treated equal is something other than being treated like a man. Maybe it is treating the woman with respect.

    4. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Then just ask for people to be nice without wrapping the whole discussion in some bullshit PC misogyny turd burrito.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You're asking to be treated with MORE respect then a man.

      Because the man gets cused out every day. The man gets abuse that is sent at him with the intention of breaking down his ego and making him crack. And if the man does crack... no one feels bad for him. To the contrary, he is held in contempt for being so weak.

      That is equality.

      Women don't want that. They want to be treated as like women AND be given the respect of men.

      Women are not respected. Women are protected.

      If you're benefiting from that protection then you can't claim equality.

      You're either equal or you're not. You're either willing to deal with the same shit the men deal with every day or you expect SPECIAL treatment just for you.

      And if you think you're entitled to it... then I'd like to know why and what you're willing to pay for it?

      Because... men are quite happy to renew the old social arrangement.

      Women will be protected from male society. We will protect you from our viciousness and brutality. And in return... you stay out of our business.

      That was the old arrangement.

      If you want in... that fine. But you will not be protected from viciousness and brutality if you enter our world. This is how it works.

      Choose.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      "Respect" that's special treatment only of women by only men defined only by women. That's respect. That's chauvinistic-narcissism-based deference. I've yet to meet a single woman in my life that wasn't sure she deserved special treatment. Even the relatively nice (in the rare non-PC bullshit sense of the word) ones were myopic as hell and admittedly treated women differently even when going on about general "humanity". One stranger says "creep" and they're off trying to blacklist the guy with no details much less any reason to believe the accuser, and you can NEVER call them on this no matter how blatant and recursive the contradictions.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    7. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Damn. Second sentence should be "That's NOT respect"....and why's this taking more than 4 mins to let me post again? What happen to less that the better part of a minute?

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    8. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the man gets cused out every day

      Speak for yourself. I'm a man and I don't get subjected to this.

      Women don't want that. They want to be treated as like women AND be given the respect of men.

      No, wrong. Many women simply want to be treated as respected equals.

      Women will be protected from male society. We will protect you from our viciousness and brutality. And in return... you stay out of our business.

      Please take your male society very very far away from me. I want no part of it. And looking round my (almost exclusively male) office, no one I know here would want your wretched hole of what passes for some sort of society for you.

      Choose.

      I choose not to associate with people like you. You sound like you move in very unpleasant circles. I want no part of that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Actually, what I want is for people to quit being assholes to each other over pointless bullshit, but that's not going to happen. It's not so much "treat me better" but more "treat EVERYONE better." That's not a man thing, a girl thing, a woman thing, or whatever - it's a person thing. And to be honest, the whole "men should put up with constant verbal abuse because they are manly" thing (paraphrased, of course) is pretty fucking stupid.

      If one is incapable of engaging in an activity without a massive amount of insanely crude shit talking, perhaps one should not be spending time around other people until one becomes more civilized, no? In online gaming, fortunately, we have many options for removing those who won't remove themselves. Ignore lists exist for a reason, and being willing and able to kick or ban people who routinely go out of their way to shit on other people helps as well. I don't take shit-talking personally, as the person doing it knows nothing about me, but that doesn't mean I care to have my gaming time be an unending stream of abuse. I give people engaging in it 1 chance, and if they keep going after I politely request they tone it down, they (usually) functionally cease to exist for me. And, I should say, my threshold for what I consider egregious is pretty high, though usually some kind of highly targeted insult (usually to race, gender, etc.) will do the trick.

      The reason for trying to cultivate a more civil community is not that I want to control what other people do or how they behave. It's that I really, really like gaming, I enjoy gaming online, and I want it to thrive and be something more people can partake in without feeling like they need to take a shower after every round because of all the terrible people they run across. A community dominated by trolls will die off very quickly; the best communities I've seen online are ones that have a bit of cultivation/moderation so that the absolute shitlords at least get weeded out.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    10. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Women will be protected from male society. We will protect you from our viciousness and brutality.

      But why be vicious and brutal in the first place?

      And in return... you stay out of our business.

      We won't be vicious and brutal to you if you stay in the kitchen and sudo make me a sandwich?

      If you want in... that fine. But you will not be protected from viciousness and brutality if you enter our world.

      What world is that? And why be vicious to anyone?

      This is how it works.

      How what works? It doesn't sound like a civilized place to me.

    11. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      That's not what this post was whining about. it was whining about women specifically being discriminated against.

      A point which is stupid because they're really not. They're just treated like everyone else and some women don't like that. They want to be treated better.

      And that's fine... if they accept declare themselves a protected class. Male chivalry will of course provide them the protection they desire.

      But that comes with a price. Women need to make a choice as to what they want their position in society to be...

      Do they want to be equals and thus ineligible for special treatment.

      Or do they want to be a protected class and therefore unable to claim discrimination when excluded from highly competitive male interests.

      For example... take sports. Should women compete against men in the Olympics or professional sports?

      Here like elsewhere, women have to make the choice of whether they want to be protected or afforded equality. Women currently have made the choice that they want to be protected in sports. They have their own distinct Olympic medals and competitions. They don't compete against men in sports. Women cannot claim discrimination when not permitted to join male competitions for this reason.

      Its either/or.

      You either compete and play by the same rules with no special consideration or quarter given... no mercy... no hesitation... no remorse.

      Or you're a protected class and any admittance you have to anything we protect you from happens at our discretion.

      Just that simple. End of discussion. End of line. Choose.

      I'll just let wonka break it down:
      http://heeereswilly.ytmnd.com/

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Speak for yourself. I'm a man and I don't get subjected to this.

      Quiet you worthless shitstain.

    13. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by kuzb · · Score: 1

      "The real truth is something that most men have trouble understanding: That women, like lawyers, have no problem at all holding two mutually exclusive opinions at the same time. They want to be skinny and make a diet and they want to eat that cake. To many women, there's no conflict in that."

      Can you provide something a little more conclusive to substantiate this claim? It seems more made up than anything based in actual fact.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    14. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to wanting to be protected from my male society, I think I made it clear that you are being offered that freely.

      However, upon claiming that you are going to be excluded from it at our discretion.

      Choose. Do you want to participate in male society or not?

      Join and suffer the stings of battle with a smile on your face and blood in your eyes.

      Or bow out and we will protect you from us.

      Its one or the other. End of line. End of story. Period.

      Choose.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to women holding mutually exclusive ideas. Many men can do that as well. Its something we're encourage not to do but anyone with any wisdom figures it out eventually.

      That said, Aristotle was not wrong when he said that two mutually exclusive things cannot be true at the same time in the same sense.

      The relevant point there is "in the same sense"... a point which colors the nature of what you're talking about in the first place.

      If and when anyone man or women or sentient gerbil attempts to make an argument that says two mutually exclusive things are true at the same time in the same sense... they're simply wrong.

      End of story.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:This has nothing to do with sexism by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We seem to live on different planets. I see men and women who think they deserve special treatment, and I haven't noticed a real numbers difference. I observe approximately no harassment, so I can't really tell how people would react to it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  23. Let me count the ways by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    anecdotes

    Prove very little and when published in a form like this prove even less. Sexual harassment and assault are highly politicized and in many cases overstated. When the mere accusation of sexual harassment in the form of making dongle jokes in a private conversation can end careers it's blatant sexism to claim it's not taken seriously enough. Sexism? yes: spreading fear that men are abusive and dangerous.

    Ive personally never heard of a man in the games industry getting rape threats for having an opinion.

    Death threats are every bit as common. Being a different gender means the hatred may be sexualized. "No rape threats against men" is a piss poor measure. How about coming up with some actual numbers reflecting the supposedly heightened hostility against women? Because no I won't take your word for it.

    Many men believe women have no worth in the games industry beyond appearance.
    The video game industry is particularly egregious at only representing women as sex objects. As such, many gamers are trained to only see women in that context.

    Would you care to back that up with facts? A survey maybe? Because it sounds like you pulled it straight from whence many of your other claims come. One sexist asshole does not a culture make. There are many games with strongfemale characters. And don't say sexy clothes prove gamers are sexist unless you want to talk about the thousands of hulking, musclebound men in games.

    This kind of harassment leaves long-lasting damage. It affects our friendships, and can cause us to be distant from others.

    So your overly sensitive friend proves that the same hatred is worse when leveled against women? Equality means standing up for yourself. If you want to be a damsel in distress you don't want equality.

    Women in the industry are told by men what is valid for us to feel.

    No, women in general are told they're special and need everyone to cater to them. Then the gaming industry didn't cater as much garnering feminist ire. You can feel whatever you want but so can I.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Let me count the ways by rlh100 · · Score: 1

      Don't talk to many women do you? Just try asking them.

      You want well researched in depth commentary on the subject go to YouTube and look for Feminist Frequency by Anita Sarkeesian. She talks in depth about the issues and the problems women face in the gaming industry. She also talks about how she has been persecuted by men on the Internet. Well researched, well thought out commentary.

      Know any geek girls? Ask them what they think of sexual harassment in the gaming industry. Have they received any rape threats over postings?

      You mentioned death threats. Do you ever get death threats with your home address included? It is not uncommon for rape threats to include detailed personal information about the woman. Where they live. Where they work. What their email address and phone numbers are. Truly scary stuff.

      But truth be told, you are probably not really interested in the truth. You would rather keep your blinders on so you don't have to face the fact that this is a serious problem that technical women / geek girls face every day. You might have to change your views and own up to how you are part of the problem.

    2. Re:Let me count the ways by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You want well researched in depth commentary on the subject go to YouTube and look for Feminist Frequency by Anita Sarkeesian.

      You shouldn't have mentioned her since she's one of the "denyers" favorite targets for harassment. She could do a video about how the sky is blue and some jerk would comment about how she's a C*** and should die.

    3. Re:Let me count the ways by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      You are going off with anecdotal bullshit again. "It's not uncommon" does not mean anything. It's hand waving to make it seem common.

      FeministFrequency's "in depth" talks are laughably horrible. I agree though, everyone should watch them so that they understand the intellectual honesty behind the "sexism is everywhere" griefers. It is completely biased nonsense that has been pointed out hundreds of times. Of course every time someone explains why she is wrong then she and people like you use that as proof that she is right.

    4. Re:Let me count the ways by kuzb · · Score: 1

      "But truth be told, you are probably not really interested in the truth. You would rather keep your blinders on so you don't have to face the fact that this is a serious problem that technical women / geek girls face every day. You might have to change your views and own up to how you are part of the problem."

      There's the problem. Blanket statements. There's no actual proof that Man X is part of the problem, but he fucking better well get to apologising.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  24. Crystal Ball by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Based on my discussions in the past, I'm guessing the mostly male audience here will say something like "not here" or "I've never seen that". I am reminded of a (financially struggling) friend of mine who posted on her blog talking about the myth of white priviledge and her other (entirely white) friends saying "Right on!". In casting herself as a vicitm, she tried to say that the experiences of minorities were not unique.

    No one here, unless you've been a woman, knows what it's like to work in an overwhelmingly male (and foul-mouthed;)) culture. And yes, it's possible to overcome that treatment -- but that doesn't it right.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Crystal Ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tried being a lone male in a female work enviroment?

  25. meanwhile in the real world by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't believe it actually happens that way. Would you care to debate the point?

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:meanwhile in the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it happens more like:
      Crowd: "Geez, who is this chick, the VP's girlfriend?"

  26. Re:Need to ask the proper questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    She's telling the stories of four different women in the article, so your point is completely without merit

  27. Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by quietwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before I read the article, before I decided whether there was a legitimate point, before I even had a chance to introspect whether or not I, personally, held some socially unacceptable viewpoints at an unconscious level, before all this, I saw the trigger warnings.

    So before I read the article and judge it on it's own merits, let me talk about trigger warnings for a second, and what they seem to say.

    My own personal experience with them tends to be very limited, but a casual perusal indicates that the vast majority of users appear to promote misandry - that is, man-hating - as an acceptable form of discrimination. There appears to be a fundamental belief that males, either consciously or not, are simply evil, often comically so. One site even referred to consensual, loving, heterosexual sex as "a man masturbating into a woman," and the author indicated their belief that any male-female interaction was one form of abuse or another, with the woman always the victim.

    For lack of a better phrase, this level of irrational hate has become their religion, and it colors their views. Like the person who only has a hammer in their tool box, every problem appears to be a because-of-man nail, and we know how well that sort of thinking works.

    So what the trigger warnings before this article seems to say is "I have a better chance of getting truthful and unbiased coverage from Fox News in an election year than I do of finding the barest glimmer of a hint of truth in the following text."

    1. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by quietwalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I want to do a point-by-point, but ... there is no point. This is just a hate speech, perhaps only good for it's cathartic effect.

      The bit where she indicates that harassment involving looks or those taunts of a sexual nature are unique to women because she hadn't heard of men being harassed was an impressive piece of ignorance, but itself only a single point adrift in a sea of wrong, and it'd take too long to wade through every one.

      That being said, I took special issue with the sub-section that starts out "People just don't understand," and is then followed by paragraph after paragraph of "men can't understand," or "men don't know this." The very design of this argument refutes rational discussion; make claim, then state men (and 'brainwashed' women) can't understand, if anyone disagrees - that is, does not completely accept male culpability regardless of their involvement - they are perpetuating the problem due to ignorance, if not malice, and their arguments are thus refuted. In this way one can neatly make a claim and deal with dissenters in a single fell stroke.

      I also noted that there wasn't a single constructive comment on how to fix this perceived problem. There were even references to pieces that had made suggestions, but this one in itself was simply a sort of angry screed against men.

      In summary; the article failed to present a real case that misogyny is the driving force behind harassment of specific individuals or that indeed, harassment of a given gender is either exclusive, endemic or systemic. If this was meant to spur a call to action, it was a poorly thought out exercise.

        - and I'm not saying that because she's female, either.

    2. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by quietwalker · · Score: 2

      The source of the quote above was Andrea Dworkin. Due to a combination of her immense weight, persistent and vocal misandry, and her declaration of her sexual preference, she was often referred as "that fat, angry lesbian," - you may recognize her from that, though it's unrelated to her belief system. Her primary belief structure revolved around the concept that male sexuality was a horrific abomination, that men are the source of all evil and suffering in the world, and that men must be tamed or destroyed.

      She wrote many books with dollar-and-a-half words that focused on very complex explanations for her view of human sexuality, and provided wonderful quotes like this:
      "Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice." -- Andrea Dworkin
      "The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." -- Andrea Dworkin
      "Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know what it is to be free." --Andrea Dworkin

      etc. She made her mark by making such outrageous statements, often. The general theme seem to be that men are evil and that female-male interaction of any type is called rape. The current trend of referring to concepts like staring or flirting as a type of rape come from this mindset.

      However, she was in no way the only one. There are generations before and after her, and just as people quoted Valerie Solanas, people quote her as well. Simply search around for "radical feminist" - that's the phrase that means 'feminism but hates men' or in other words, 'female supremacist'. You'll find a ton of amusing quotes that a rational person would be hard pressed to believe.

      The general consensus is that she probably did far more harm to the cause of female equality than she did to help it. However, many people today don't understand why that is, and parrot her quotes and ideas without awareness.

    3. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Third/Fourth wave feminists tend to loathe Dworkin and other radfems.

    4. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Then tend to dial back the blatant bigotry and use other hand waving to come to basically the same conclusion. "Men are the problem", "Women are held back by men", "Men hate and harass women", etc.

      Third and "Fourth" wave feminism took radfem rhetoric and gave it a sugar coating. And simply say "you just don't understand what feminism is about" and "you're talking about radfems" if anyone points this out. They "loathe" radfems because they needed a sacrificial lamb.

    5. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      ; - and I'm not saying that because she's female, either.

      Yes you are. You just don't know it. You have a terrible affliction. You are evil. You should not be allowed in polite society.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    6. Re:Trigger warnings inidicate deeply held bias by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's lots of things I have a great deal of difficulty understanding. Prejudice against women. Prejudice against minorities. Prejudice against GLBT people. Prejudice against the poor. What my Ukrainian neighbor went through in the 1930s and 1940s. It may be that I lack empathy, but I just don't get much prejudice against me for belonging to a group.

      Therefore, I try to take complaints from people in less favored social groups seriously. I don't understand. I'm not sure I really can.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  28. Re:Anecdotes for the win! by HiThere · · Score: 2

    To an extent, but only to an extent, you are correct.

    The problem is that when someone who feels they should be entitled relative to someone else also feels that the somone else is favored over them, you get a lot more vitriol. And a lot of men and boys feel that they should be entitled relative to women. And yes, this also happens along racial lines. And anonymity makes them feel safe in targeting the "unfairly" favored.

    Please note that I do not intend ANY actual implication as to whether or not the targeted individual actually is favored in any sane sense of the term. I'm talking purely about perceptions. And I intentionally spoke in generalities. It could as easily describe relationships between customers and clerks as anything else, but for most people that relationship does not impact the attention that they devote to the world significantly.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. Hypothetical by rabtech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For all of you trying to turn this into a men's rights issue, just stop.

    You're embarrassing my gender.

      Yes there are some unfair things that happen to men. Yes there are some real issues.

    But we aren't talking about those issues right here in this post. We're talking about women right now, so let's stick to the topic.

      Even as a man I find it highly annoying that the Internet jackass squad has to jump into the middle of every single conversation about women and cry "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ?!?!". Just fucking stop it already. Write your own blog post about men's issues and submit it to slashdot and we can discuss it over there.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
    1. Re:Hypothetical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, these are those issues, just one side is trying to say 'but when it happens to us it's special!'. Internet asshattery is widespread and knows no exceptions.

    2. Re:Hypothetical by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      But men aren't allowed to have men's rights discussions.

      Their conferences get shut down, their online personas doxed, they aren't allowed to talk about it, CASE IN POINT.

      You are an embarrassment of a human being.

    3. Re:Hypothetical by bytesex · · Score: 1

      Yes they are. What a strange thing to say?! It may not be interesting, but you can surely start any discussion, right?

      "Their conferences get shut down"

      [citation needed]

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    4. Re:Hypothetical by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      One somewhat recent example:

      http://metronews.ca/news/ottaw...

      There are some people who feel that you have a right to speak on an issue only if they agree with what you are saying and will attempt to silence your speech if they do not.

    5. Re:Hypothetical by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't worry about being embarrassed by my gender. I'm already too embarrassed by my species.

    6. Re:Hypothetical by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Hang out with Elliot Rodger at http://alphagameplan.blogspot....?

    7. Re:Hypothetical by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't worry about being an embarrassment to my gender. I'm already too much an embarrassment to my species.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Hypothetical by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      But we aren't talking about those issues right here in this post. We're talking about women right now, so let's stick to the topic.

      No, because it's a fucking stupid topic.

      Why should we only care about women getting insulted online? That's sexist. If you wanna talk about anyone getting insulted/trolled online, fine, but why should we listen to this sexist BS as if women have it worse "in the gaming world" than men? They don't.

      It's a bit like campaigning about female genital mutilation. Why don't people campaign against all infant genital mutilation? Similarly, it's because Western culture seems to value girls and women's bodily integrity more than that of men and boys. I don't think it's unreasonable for us to get over that sexism. And if we can't, we should just go back to traditional gender roles because we can't get the equality thing right.

    9. Re:Hypothetical by strikethree · · Score: 1

      But we aren't talking about those issues right here in this post. We're talking about women right now, so let's stick to the topic.

      I was not going to participate in the discussion because most every viewpoint was already covered... but then you had to go and say what I quoted above. *sigh*

      She is claiming that men are attacking her. So right there, we have an issue about men. The woman is talking exclusively about men.

      Is it surprising that people are talking about men? Especially when her words accuse ALL men?

      Personally, I see some of the discussion about women and some of the discussion about men, which makes sense since ultimately, it is a discussion about how women and men interact.

      Note how I avoided discussion the merits, or lack thereof, of her entire thesis? There is one thing I would really really like to say though:

      There appears to be a group of alpha males and wannabe alpha males (trolls) who attack everything. Female, male, whatever. They try to find the weakest point of that person and tear them down. She seems to be a victim of that and is trying to express it in terms of sexual assault.

      It is not surprising that she would do so; after all, she can only speak of things from her experiences. What she does not realize is that it happens to everybody. Being a woman, the attacks are more sexualized in nature but even men get assaulted in that manner. Hell, most of the Slashdot regulars have been assaulted like that. There is a reason for all of the basement jokes. It is safer down there.

      Back to the main point, the reason you see so much discussion about mens' issues is that she has made it one by claiming that men in general act that way. It is simply not true and most Slashdot readers are tired of being assaulted by this claim. We do not want women to be assaulted any more than we want ourselves to be assaulted... and yet here we are, the male regulars of Slashdot are being assaulted. Again.

      Take your womens' issues and stick them up your ass. This is a dominance issue. It has nothing to do with gender other than most of the alpha type folks are male. Even then, not all alphas play dominance games like that. And to top all of THAT off, the majority of males are not even alphas or wannabe alphas.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  30. Re:Need to ask the proper questions. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but adults need to take some responsibility for the situations they put themselves in. End of story. Crying victim every time you're criticized does not encourage respect, and that's what these professional victim blog articles are all about.

  31. I don't think it's the industry in general. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I was working in the video game development industry for a number of years and in that time, I never once saw women being treated an differently than men.. although I have heard stories of it happening at other places. i think it depends, therefore, on the types of people that a particular game studio might tend to employ.

    1. Re:I don't think it's the industry in general. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I've been working as a Software developer for over 35 years, at many different companies in both the EU and US. To be fair I have never worked in the games development industry.

      There's more often than not been at least one female developer in the places I have worked at, and in all that time I have never once seen or heard of anything even remotely close to what this article describes. I have not even seen an environment where it could/would have consistently happened or even been tolerated at all, let alone been the cultural norm.

    2. Re:I don't think it's the industry in general. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      And it depends where you are online. I'm a member of an online RPG called Kingdom of Loathing with a pretty active chat system.

      The moderators are *very* active. Say what you will about heavy-handedness, but recent events have proven that if you start throwing around anything with a flavor of misogyny to it in open chat, you will be banned with much prejudice. May be partially related to our uncharacteristically high female playerbase but the game creators are all guys.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  32. Re:where the fuck do these people work? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    You gotta sell advertising somehow. "All is good" doesn't farm clicks you know.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  33. Re:"Men" in the gaming industry? by WarSpiteX · · Score: 1

    ... you have no idea what you're talking about.

    The stereotypical neckbeards are the minority.

    --


    I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
  34. Re:Just because... by seebs · · Score: 1

    Uh.

    Actually, it is pretty much the case that women in general are harassed by men.

    I'm 42. I've known dozens of women well enough to talk to them about their experiences. I think maybe one or two of them report that harassment stuff like this is fairly rare for them. The rest regard it as pretty ordinary.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  35. This is bullshit by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is why women are socialized to carefully dance around these issues, disagreeing with men in an extremely gentle manner. Not because women are nicer creatures than men. But because our very survival can depend on it. ... Growing a thicker skin isn't the answer, nor is it a proper response. Listening, and making the industry safer for the existence of visible women is the best, and only, way forward."

    These days, it's men who are being 'carefully socialized' to dance around feminist gynocentric expectations and value systems. I believe HR departments call it 'sensitivity training.' Since proof of guilt is rarely required, employment for men is now a mad dash in a mine field of passive aggressive barbs just waiting to trigger whenever a woman is pissed enough to throw the book at a man. we're told this is justified because men alone engage in this behavior en masse, and that women are (ironically) damsels in distress who have no say or part in their situations, nor are they capable of similar behavior. This crap flooded hollywood and tv in the 90s, and now we're getting the full deluge of the same propaganda in the gaming scene. What bullshit. Polygon loves it, though, as they post a lot of it. The fact they shut off comments for this article speaks volumes about its logical and probably factual integrity.

    We don't give people respect who haven't earned it and/or have given us reason to take it from them. Derek smart anyone? People still give john romero shit for daikatana even though he was a big part of the success of doom. He's revered for the good he's done and demonized for his stillborn shitpiles. This is how it's supposed to work. We're not supposed to hold some people above reproach based on their sexual organs or their race or any other irrelevant attribute, as that is the very definition of privilege. This makes the whole article 180 degrees out from the truth. Growing a thicker skin IS the answer as it allows one to stop and look at criticism objectively instead of immediately flying into a tantrum and/or a flurry of passive aggressive countermaneuvers. It allows one to ignore the ad hominems and other fallacies from any communication, whether it's well written constructive criticism or vitriolic trolling, and extract any truth from it.

    These days, we are seeing more and more extreme reactions for ever more mundane situations from a culture bred to be as intolerant of criticism as possible. Everything has to be positive. All the time. No 'negative nancies' or 'debbie downers' allowed. The fact this precludes talking about the truth of things more than 50% of the time is lost on these social engineers. All that matters to them are feelings and consensus; the facts and truth be damned.

    The term 'safer' here is used in place of 'more amenable' to make the situation sound more dire than it is. The bottom line is, very very very few men are truly guilty of assaulting women. I believe the stats on college campuses nationwide is 53 in one year...53 out of millions of students on thousands of campuses. This is NOT an epidemic, and I'll bet it's more than the number of assaults by male game developers and staff. If you are assaulted, don't whine on the internet. Call the police. The reason most of these women don't is because they know their claims are bullshit. Otherwise, they should act like the adults they want to be treated as, taking warranted criticism for what it is, regardless of format, and discarding the rest.

    1. Re:This is bullshit by rlh100 · · Score: 1

      Don't talk to many women do you? Just ask a woman. Ask your mother. I think you will be surprised how common it is.

      Ask simple questions like:
      Have you ever felt unsafe because of the comments men are making about you?
      How often do you evaluate your personal security around men?
      Have you ever been sexually harassed?

      Know a geek girl? Ask her:
      Have you ever been harassed with a rape threat because of a comment you made on line?

      Listen to the answers and then start looking at your own behavior. Why are you making it the women's problem rather than looking at your own behavior and beliefs?

    2. Re:This is bullshit by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't talk to many women do you? Just ask a woman. Ask your mother. I think you will be surprised how common it is.

      Ask simple questions like: Have you ever felt unsafe because of the comments men are making about you?

      I'm not responsible if you feel uncomfortable around me. Your feeling uncomfortable might be due to me actively working to make you uncomfortable, or it may just be you being paranoid.

      How often do you evaluate your personal security around men?

      Men evaluate their personal security around other men all the time. It's not sexist in any way if women do the same.

      Have you ever been sexually harassed?

      In online forums? All the time.

      Know a geek girl? Ask her: Have you ever been harassed with a rape threat because of a comment you made on line?

      As a man, I face violent threats all the time online. This includes death threats.

      Listen to the answers and then start looking at your own behavior. Why are you making it the women's problem rather than looking at your own behavior and beliefs?

      Because most people understand that your "feels" may not actually be rooted in anything I did. If my wife "feels" neglected, it's not necessarily a fact that I neglect her. If my wife "feels" unloved, it is not necessarily a fact that I do not love her. If a woman I talk to at work "feels" harassed, it is not necessarily a fact that I harassed her.

      The problem is that you are trying to make men responsible for the way women feel, and "feels" are an entirely subjective thing. When you can objectively measure on a proper granular scale how "loved", "creepy", etc a man is being (regardless of how the woman perceives it), then we can talk about whether it's a problem or not - until then it's all subjective and I see no reason for the female point of view into feelings to be more legitimate than the males point of view.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    3. Re:This is bullshit by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      I think you just proved the parent's point. "These days, it's men who are being 'carefully socialized' to dance around feminist gynocentric expectations and value systems." To which you respond: "Listen to the answers and then start looking at your own behavior."

    4. Re:This is bullshit by Leggman · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Navy we would have a briefing about culture / risks before entering any port. When we went to Singapore we had a long discussion about 'Outraging the Modesty of a Lady'...punishable with fines, prison or caning. Essentially it was illegal in Singapore to do something which would outrage the modesty of a lady - and at the time it was ENTIRELY up to the lady to determine what / when her modesty had been outraged...made for an interesting and awkward visit. Later same trip visited Jordan and actually found that the admonishment there to not make eye contact with any women to be less onerous

      --
      You don't eat crackers in the bed of your future or you get all...scratchy! - The Tick
  36. Competent by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    If anything my experience female programmers on average are more competent. If they have any "failing" it is that they aren't blowhards which seems to actually work in many occupations. I don't know how many male programmers that basically claim "I came into that company and put a 2 year project to bed. Without me they would still be using punch cards." When the reality is that he worked as an intern formatting hard drives. Then when you look at his code it is the million monkeys with a million keyboards experiment done by a single programmer. Whereas the female programmers that I have met tend to take a task, finish a task, take a task, finish a task; no glory.

    What I would say is that the worst male programmers tend to compensate for their terrible skills by being louder whereas the bad female programmers tend to either leave or find different jobs within tech.

    But at the same time my experience within various organizations is that female programmers weren't treated any differently that I could see. It certainly wasn't ever a living episode of Mad Men.

    So if I had to guess it is that any culture that sounds like what she is writing about comes from the top down. Programmers are rarely social gods; so if an asshole marketing type were running the company they might start taking their cues from him. Then I suspect it could get really bad really quickly.

    1. Re:Competent by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I don't think that I have ever seen a female sysadmin, ever. But the job jumping is critical for paycheck success; but only for those that are good. Just about every programmer thinks that the company would fail without them but when they leave it is usually easy to fill their spot with someone equal or better. But when the really good ones go suddenly the company realizes that the company can't replace them with a single person or that they will need to massively pay more to fill the positiion. The result is that the new person benefits from this pay jump; except that the person who left has a good chance of jumping into the exact same situation; that is a company that has realized that they need to pay more for the vacant position.

      I know one person (not a programming position) where the person left a after 35 years and a salary of $130,000 and after 6 months of searching they hired 3 people the top of the 3 is being paid $280,000 ($190,000 +plus massive benefits). But I guarantee that they would never been able to negotiate half of that raise short of something underhanded if they had tried to stay.

    2. Re:Competent by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Overall, in field X that discourages group Y, members of Y in field X got there because of determination, and are very likely better on the average than not-Ys. I'd expect a female programmer to be slightly better than a male programmer on the average, and a male nurse to be slightly better than a female nurse on the average.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Re: The fine art of male bonding. by jemmyw · · Score: 1

    Why should people put up with it just because you do? I wouldn't. I'm not exactly thin skinned but I think there is a level of professionalism that should be affected at work. I'm quite happy to have a very different relationship with the same people out of work.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Re:It's about "control", guys by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    When her body, her right, her choice is no longer his responsibility, then we'll've actually made progress.

  41. LOL by ulatekh · · Score: 1

    Now that was funny. Thanks for sharing.

    --
    "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
  42. Re: The fine art of male bonding. by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

    I worked with friends. Not best friends - male friendship allows for much shallower bonds. I don't exchange christmas cards with any of them, but I know that each and every one of them would buy me a pint tomorrow, if I bumped into them.

  43. Geek Girls gets first rape threat around age 11 by rlh100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My daughter and I were talking about how much personally directed sexual violence geek girls must endure. She was talking about the obsessive personally detailed threats Anita Sarkeesian creator of Feminist Frequency endures from the male geek community on a continual basis. Some of these are threats include her personal details needed to carry them out. This is really scary stuff.
    We were talking about this and she casually let drop:
    "I received my first rape threat in a forum when I was eleven"

    She casually went on:
    "Eleven is the age when geek girls first start discovering the Internet and make their first posts. They comment on a game about some small feature they don't like. Some guy will flame them with a rape threat"

    This is very shocking for a dad to hear his daughter say. "My eleven year old little girl!" She is twice as old now. But her saying it so casually is deeply disturbing.

    My daughter has assimilated it. She has grown a "thick skin". I think she enjoys giving back as good as she gets. But not the violent rape stuff.

    It is very sad that the male geek culture permits such abuse to go on.
    We MEN need to start talking about this. We MEN need to ostracize the men who threaten rape.
    * It is never funny.
    * It is not "just a joke".
    * It is not harmless.

    It is really scary for geek girls because there is always a risk that it might be real. There are unbalanced men out there after all.

    How do I change this? I start by writing about it. I talk with other people. I try to get MEN to understand the problem and see how scary it is for women.

    1. Re:Geek Girls gets first rape threat around age 11 by nurd68 · · Score: 1

      That's a good start.

      I approach it from the other end - I teach people (including women) how to shoot and refer them to concealed carry licensing courses.

      Of course, now someone will insult me for carrying a gun. Compensating for having a small penis is the one I get most often.

  44. Re: The fine art of male bonding. by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

    ...As I would them. he hastily adds.

  45. Feminist here by Xarvh · · Score: 1

    I'm a man, I consider myself a feminist, no I don't feel threatened the slightest by feminists and feminism, I have friends of both gender that identify as feminists.
    What's the big deal?

    Is it so hard to consider that something is true even if it's completely out of your personal experience?
    "Men too" is not an answer, because the harassment and threats that women face is disproportionate to what men face.

    How old where you when you first feared to be raped? Now go ask your female friends.
    A significant portion of women in the western world has endured sexual abuse and probably still bears the scars of that.
    That's women that you see in your life, that you meet daily. Only they don't tell you.
    Yes, men are also abused. It is a problem, but it's nowhere as common and nowhere as socially acceptable.

    You don't know everything. Your perception is not all-encompassing. Your experience is not the same as those of the opposite gender.
    Deal with it.

    1. Re:Feminist here by Cederic · · Score: 1

      "Men too" is not an answer, because the harassment and threats that women face is disproportionate to what men face.

      No, men face actual violence rather than mere threats. Have you seen assault numbers broken down by gender? Murder numbers?

      How old where you when you first feared to be raped?

      12, since you ask. I had to fight off four attackers. Luckily they were too focussed on achieving penetration to actually work out how to immobilise me.

      A significant portion of women in the western world has endured sexual abuse and probably still bears the scars of that.

      So I'm meant to do what about it exactly?

      Yes, men are also abused. It is a problem, but it's nowhere as common and nowhere as socially acceptable.

      Abuse of women is not socially acceptable where I live, where I work, where I go out at night. Maybe you should move to a better country.

      Then again, maybe I should. Abuse of men is socially acceptable, when it's merely verbal.

      Your experience is not the same as those of the opposite gender.
      Deal with it.

      I can and do deal with it. I'm just fucked off with the pretense that women have it so much worse.

  46. Gamers aren't special by Zynder · · Score: 1

    ANYONE feels entitled to vent when you're on the Internet- you're relatively anonymous and there just aren't any real consequences for being a total douchebag. Sure, every once in awhile someone may get a visit from the men in black for threatening the prez or some such but overall no one ever comes after these guys. Slashdot is full of this stuff!

    1. Re:Gamers aren't special by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      ANYONE feels entitled to vent when you're on the Internet- you're relatively anonymous and there just aren't any real consequences for being a total douchebag.

      Too true, and I'm not sure what the compensating benefit is. There are situations where anonymity can be beneficial, but a social/gaming arena is not one of them. Why allow anonymity if it only encourages people to act like irresponsible douchebags?

      A half-serious solution for a gaming platform that wants to reduce the douchebag problem: make all gamers register under their real name, and record all of their in-game communications in a searchable database that the world (including present and future employers) can Google. That ought to clean at least some of them up.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Gamers aren't special by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Or just ban the cunts quickly when they are reported for abuse. It always amazed me years ago when xbox live was invariably filled by racist/sexist/abusive chumps who the reporting system clearly wasn't enforced. Every time a girls voice (or a possibly female gamertag) was heard in a game there'd be 1+ twat making sexual remarks, telling them to get back in the kitchen incessently. People are paying MS decent money for live and MS ignoring that crap was basically a big fuck you to anyone female, asian, black or whatever who wanted to game online without constant abuse.

    3. Re:Gamers aren't special by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I have never heard this 'get back in the kitchen' phrase before. Who says that?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  47. Re: "Men" in the gaming industry? by nsmutz · · Score: 1

    Bigoted much?

  48. Use a gender non-specific nick by aybiss · · Score: 1

    It's that easy!

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  49. Re:Need to ask the proper questions. by wardred · · Score: 1

    I don't believe an anonymous person, probably a male, posting a woman't address and telling her he's going to rape her some night is a position she thought she'd be in because she decided to work in the gaming industry.

    It's certainly not a position I think I'm putting myself in when I apply for a job. I wouldn't call it criticism either. That crosses the line from juvenile and possibly hurtful speech to a threat one might have to take seriously.

  50. Re:Anecdotes for the win! by cowdung · · Score: 1

    Its true.. people are ruder online than they are in person.

    Its like they feel the have a license to do or say whatever they want. A culture of lawlessness.

    Also, the Internet gives the real creeps of the world more direct access to you. In the real world you wouldn't let them get close to you.. but on the Internet they can get into your face!

  51. Re:"Men" in the gaming industry? by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

    While this comment is clearly a troll, it highlights nicely that trolls can target either gender. The problem these women are experiencing with people on the internet isn't to do with the entire male gender, it has to do with internet trolls. There are plenty out there, and when you strike one down two more take their place. And while most trolls may be men, most men are not trolls.

  52. Sensitive? by PPH · · Score: 1

    To being criticized by women? I think not. Or the species would have gone extinct thousands of years ago.

    Personally, I like women that can stand up or themselves. I am admittedly a bit of a jerk and I don't think a relationship with me would survive if a girlfriend or wife wasn't capable of telling me when I'm being an asshole. As long as its constructive criticism, I'm OK with it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. How about fixing the males? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I'm a rare advocate of preventing rapists from ever having children. Face it, rape worked for the whole evolution of humans. Those aggressive traits worked and the evolutionary pressures rewarded them. There is no reason society can't decide to finally do something about promotion of that behavior into the gene pool. Males are genetically evolved towards the behavior and you can't condition all of them properly from birth to get the results you demand (thank goodness we don't know how because those skills would be used to control people in bad ways... and what we know already is abused.) Perhaps this could lower the need to dominate as well and cut down on domestic abuse (another big source for rape and similar abuse... we don't even have good stats on raped partners because they don't report it or rationalize.) Geeks are probably better than most male demographics at controlling their urges - the anonymous tools free inhibitions for EVERYBODY not just geeks.

    No, it is not a slippery slope to eugenics and if you think so you need to look up the slippery slope fallacy.

    1. Re:How about fixing the males? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      You'd need to fix the women first. The sexually aggressive guys are the ones they find sexiest. But of course you'd need to fix reality first. Dominating is how you win on Earth. If anything abortion and birth control have damaged the species by blocking the proliferation of rapey genes, resulting in a listless population.

  54. Ya, pretty much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    That is why when you play online shooters, which attract many immature males, "faggot" is the default insult. They are insecure about their sexuality, as most young men are, and thus being called gay is one of the more hurtful things to them. they externalize that, of course, and thus that is what they use by default against others. However if they find something that works better, they'll go after that. Race, age, nationality, etc, etc.

    They are assholes, sociopaths sometimes, they want to hurt others and they choose whatever they think is the most effective way to do it.

    For that matter humans in general do it, women included. Bill Burr ha some hilarious bits, based in truth as the best comedy is, about women steering a losing argument towards personal attacks against their man. Saying he has a little dick, is a momma's boy, that kind of thing.

    Well, that really happens. It isn't because women are some horrible creatures, but rather because they are using the insults they have learned will hurt the worst, when they get mad and decide to turn to insults. It's what people do when they lash out.

    The difference between a normal person and a troll/asshole/ITG/sociopath and so on online is that most people do it only when they are angry, when they are lashing out at another person. These asshats do it for fun, just to get a rise out of people, and so on.

    It is not something to be celebrated, or even tolerated (in any community I moderate trolling is a fast way to the banhammer) but trying to act like it is a problem limited to or directed at women is silly.

  55. Re:"Men" in the gaming industry? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Here's an informative response to one of those trolls, pay no attention to his bad math it doesn't distract from the central point.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  56. Bullshit ! by da.phreak · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but this can't be generalized. I do work in the games industry as a Lead of programmers, mostly men but some women. I can speak for our whole game team to say that there is no such harassment. Those cases are very bad indeed, but it's not like this happens everywhere in the game industry on a regular basis. In our company, this kind of behaviour would get you fired for sure.

  57. Women in competitive gaming by 8086 · · Score: 1

    Even outside of the extreme examples, women have a tough time in the competitive gaming scene and are immediately written off when they show the slightest bit of incompetence. For example, take Pyrion flax and Sheever from the Dota 2 competitive scene. Pyrion is arguably worse than Sheever (he himself would probably admit that), but he is given more airtime and taken more seriously. Here's a video that shows blatant sexism among Dota 2 casters:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    I can't seem to find the video, but on day 3 of the Dota 2 TI4 championship (in the C9 vs VG match), there's a point where Sheever tries to say something about the lineups but is interrupted by other casters three times in a row. She ends up getting to say nothing before the game starts.

    I don't think there's much that can be done to get women equal and fair treatment in gaming and computer-related fields, but I'm almost certain the situation will improve itself over time as more women participate. In the meantime, we just have to try to not be such dicks to the outliers and to not look at people through the lenses of gender, race and nationality.

  58. Make sammiches by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    You'd be harassed less if you weren't uptight. Also, if you brought in cookies or sandwiches.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  59. Re:The fine art of male bonding. by nurd68 · · Score: 1

    I once got called to HR because I made a coworker cry.

    My offense?

    I asked her to do her job (which was as an analyst) a provide me with the formulae and rating tables necessary for me to program the insurance rate calculations which I was attempting to code.

    She said that was too technical and complex and that I should call the insurance company directly.

    I said no, and that she should do her job.

  60. You can create your own data by clawsoon · · Score: 1

    It's easy to pretend you're a woman online. You should try it, as an experiment. It'll get you a sample of the actual numbers that you're looking for. After you do, your opinion on the subject will be a lot more interesting, whatever it is that you discover.

  61. nothing to see here by kick6 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Woman works in indsutry were ridiculous threats of grotesque violence are the norm...over teamspeak, over chat, on forums...everywhere. Woman thinks this "abuse" is special...because she's a woman. Special rules need to be made to stop the abuse that her solipsism has convinced her only happen to her (and by extension only women).

    So basically it's the same shtick: women want equality except for when it's in a woman's interest (in this case preserving her ego) for women to be legislated superiority.

    The sad part isn't that abuse happens, the sad part is that we keep lining up to give women special privileges because they're the "weaker sex" all while attempting to champion the cause of equality.

  62. I don't know any... by Teunis · · Score: 1

    I don't know any women for whom threats like this have not become real at some point. (whatever stats say, assume that probably only 1 case in 20 is actually reported and that's a fair rate)

    That's one of the key differences. For most men, these threats are just "noise".

    Google "missing women" if you want a clue about how real it can get.

    This is why I'll continue to argue for women's rights. In a world where a woman can walk down a street at night without risk of assault, so can anyone.

    PS: this applies for LBTQ-type folks too.

  63. Re:It's not just woman; it's workplace harassment, by PPH · · Score: 1

    The reality is men basically have to suffer through this harassment too and the difference is they are expected to put up with it.

    No, I'm not. When some lard-ass starts shouting, pounding the table and threatening people physically, I can back him down. Not many women can.

    Management needs to make it clear that this behavior will not be tolerated. Or the company will end up being run by Bubba and all the intellectual talent will move on. This is fine if you are in the business of digging ditches. Not so much in the software business.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  64. Anonymity by Vordreller · · Score: 1

    Anonymity seems to be the red line through all the examples here.

    Once again I'm strengthened in my belief that there should be no such thing as online anonymity.

  65. To Brianna by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Brianna,

    Not all people in the world are respectful.

    When you are in a command position or publicly declaring your opinion (online posting), you will make decisions/comments that other people disagree with.

    The disrespectful ones will attempt to cut you down by making crude comments intended to hurt you as much as possible, especially if they can do it anonymously. Often, they will pursue what sets you apart from the average population because bullies innately know that most people are self-consciousness about standing out.

    If you are a minority, they will come after your race. If you are a woman, they will come after your gender. If you are gay, they will come after your sexuality. If you have a family, they will threaten your children. If you are handicapped, they will come after your disability. If you are attractive, they will insult your beauty. If you are ugly, they will insult your beauty. If you are obese, they will insult your weight. If you are thin, they will insult your weight. If you are a man, they will insult your genitalia. If you are a woman, they will insult your genitalia.

    This is the way that the world works. No amount of whining online will change it; it just lets them know that they have hit home. It is not fair. Life is not fair. However, effective individuals accept this harassment as the cost of being a manager or public figure. They learn to absorb it, ignore it or thrive on it. Then they continue to move forward towards their goals.

    If you cannot learn to deal with the harassment associated with leadership or public positions, consider less visible paths forward in life.

    Sincerely,
    cyn1c77

    1. Re:To Brianna by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      There are so many ignorant things in your statement holy shit.

      I hope you continue living a life this free of any actual hardships.

      Please stop posting, thanks.

  66. ...and the elephant in the room is... by kuzb · · Score: 2

    What we're all forgetting here is that we're still moving out of the dark ages of computer use, since the generation that suffered the most for the sake of their ambitions are still alive. The one where being a computer enthusiast meant you were a social pariah and were destined to be abused constantly by everyone, especially all through highschool. Then bam, society takes a hard left and suddenly it's cool to be tech savvy. That doesn't help all the people that got shit on for decades before things turned around.

    Now these abused souls are grown up, and in the industry and you wonder why they're assholes? If this were any other situation you'd have governments creating support groups. Instead, everyone is demonizing them for being harsh and defensive. You're not going to see this problem go away for several generations, if it goes away at all and it is a problem that society itself built through its perpetual abuse of other people.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  67. heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

    i suppose you don't appreciate the irony in your post, but i do. i appreciate it enough for both of us.

    yes, we understand that NOT ALL MEN are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women.

    some of them are. plenty enough to cause problems. jumping in and saying NOT ALL MEN is just derailing the conversation before it can get anywhere productive. way to defend us downtrodden and persecuted men everywhere!

    1. Re:heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      i suppose you don't appreciate the irony in your post

      Then you failed to comprehend it because there isn't any, legitimate criticism is fine but that is not what this is. You are confusing making sweeping accusatory generalizations with criticism.

    2. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      Oh, i assure you, the post is terribly ironic. You are making a post defending men against criticism, against an article that says men are overly sensitive and quick to defend themselves. Delicious.

      Every time a man responds to "men are this..." with "not ALL men!" an angel gets her wings.

      We get it. Not ALL men. The author was not implying all men. Just some. That's still too many! There is still a problem that needs fixing! Self centered asshats assume they are being personally attacked, and feel the need to defend themselves, but THE CONVERSATION ISN'T ABOUT YOU.

      Once that hurdle is overcome, maybe we can move on to actually making progress.

    3. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You are making a post defending men against criticism

      Wrong, you are really having a hard time with your english comprehension. So let's dissect it to help you understand, first show me where I defended men (I'm not sure whether you are suggesting all men or some subset so you need to clarify that as well) against criticism.

    4. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      you're being so obtuse, i would think you were trolling if you didn't sound so sincere.

      One of the consequences is that men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women

      This is something that is simply not true of all men so why make statements like that?

      that's you, defending us men against criticism.

    5. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No, what I said is the statement is untrue. You wrongly interpret that as defending against criticism and thus make the statement inarguable by any man so you - as a man - then would be unable to disagree with her statement without proving it to be true do you not see how silly that is? Now even if you did accept that interpretation you further manage to somehow misinterpret my statement to mean I am "extremely sensitive", where again you fail. Do you believe her statement to be true?

      It's not being "obtuse" it's your failed grasp of the English language and inferences of things that are not there.

    6. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      Let's try this.

      One of the consequences is that [some significant portion of] men are extremely sensitive to being criticized by women

      Do you still disagree? Because that is the statement the author was making.

    7. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And now you've realized that you misinterpreted what was written to the point that you have to re-write it to say what you misinterpreted it to say. My statement is based on what it said, not what you have re-written it to say.

    8. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      No, I am trying to drag you, kicking and screaming, into an epiphany.

      I assure you, the author is not an idiot. It would be idiotic to claim that all men are overly sensitive to criticism. Anyone with half a brain, who is not also blinded by their own defense mechanisms, can see that the author does not mean all men. that would indeed be a ridiculous statement.

      You can either interpret your way, which gets us nowhere, or my way, which is the beginning of a dialog. Choice is yours.

    9. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No I'm interpreting it exactly as written. I also directly clarified my interpretation in my response so as not to be misunderstood, yet continue to deliberately misinterpret it. However even if you interpret her statement some other way - for example that she meant "some men" - then clearly my post becomes redundant in terms of your interpretation anyway so why are you bothering to reply to it at all?

    10. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      no, you are interpreting it as you want to interpret it. the author did not write 'all men...' she simply wrote 'men...' which could be interpreted several ways. you choose to interpret it in a way that is ridiculous, and then go on to refute the ridiculous statement that you have put into her mouth. this is what we call a 'straw man'.

      how about this: if i were to say 'hamburgers are delicious', would it be a constructive response to say 'not ALL hamburgers are delicious! McDonald's hamburgers are terrible, and you are wrong for claiming that ALL hamburgers are delicious!'

      no, it would be a ridiculous response, because any reasonable human being could infer that when i say 'hamburgers are delicious' i mean that some hamburgers are delicious, that i think hamburgers are delicious in a general sense but that there could certainly be some hamburgers that are not delicious. certainly i would not claim that every single hamburger in existence is delicious.

      from that, we could perhaps infer that the author thinks that the majority of men are overly sensitive to criticism from women. based on the comments on this story and past stories that mention sexism, i would tend to agree with her.

    11. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      no, you are interpreting it as you want to interpret it. the author did not write 'all men...' she simply wrote 'men...' which could be interpreted several ways. you choose to interpret it in a way that is ridiculous, and then go on to refute the ridiculous statement that you have put into her mouth. this is what we call a 'straw man'.

      Bullshit, I interpreted it as written, you interpret it differently. And you know how I interpreted it and what my response was based on. It isn't a straw man at all, if you interpret the statement differently then my response is irrelevant anyway. So what is your argument, what are you trying to say? That my response is wrong in the context of my interpretation? Or that my response is wrong in terms of your interpretation?

      You seem to have extreme difficulty understanding and articulating your own thoughts, so try again. What is your point here?

    12. Re: heh, way to prove her point by Ionized · · Score: 1

      Your completely ignoring the hamburger analogy makes it quite clear that you have no interest in participating in an honest debate.

      If the author had said "all men..." then there would have been no room for interpretation. She did not, thus we are left to infer which men she is speaking about. You choose to interpret it as all men.

      My point is that you are interpreting her statement incorrectly. Anything that follows from that is useless, a straw man.

      That is why 'not all men!' is a worthless argument, and widely mocked. It is arguing against a statement that is not even being made.

      Once you can get over that hurdle you will see that authors such as the one mentioned here are not attacking every man in the world. They speak only of the ones that fit the criteria of the negative traits they discuss. You will stop seeing their words as personal attacks, which they are not, and instead see them as the first step of progress. Step one, acknowledge there is a problem.

      It's shocking to me that we STILL can't collectively as a society get past step one without people jumping in to defend men. as if we need to be defended!

    13. Re: heh, way to prove her point by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You choose to interpret it as all men.

      Right, and in that context my post is correct. So either you knew that and the supposed "irony" is non-existent or you chose to project your interpretation on to me and falsely take my post as though it was in response to your interpretation.

      My point is that you are interpreting her statement incorrectly.

      In that case my post wouldn't be relevant to your interpretation, but you can't understand.

      Anything that follows from that is useless, a straw man.

      Wrong, only if you assume my interpretation is the same as yours, which I clearly stated it was not but you lack the brain capacity to comprehend that.

      It's shocking to me that we STILL can't collectively as a society get past step one without people jumping in to defend men. as if we need to be defended!

      Wrong again, nobody is defending "men" as a whole nor the men who exhibit the behavior that is derided here stop lying.

  68. Re: The fine art of male bonding. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    But if you bumped into them you might spill their pint and then you'd get glassed...no?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  69. Re:where the fuck do these people work? by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 1

    I've never seen it working almost exclusively for defense contractors, but government contractors have very stringent anti-discrimination laws and federal labor laws they must be compliant with if they want to keep those government contracts. I see a lot less casual racism working in military offices, too--that shit isn't tolerated. Also, we don't post about the latest developments at work in public forums, and if we did, the only people who would be interested are our professional and/or national rivals.

    I get the impression that game companies tend to attract young, very competitive developers who think they are the hottest thing since sliced bread, and haven't had the life-lessons imparted by experience to convince them they aren't all that yet. And then, there's your gamer customers... if I want to experience the bottom half of the bell curve, I either go to general news sites comment threads, or gamer forums.

    --
    ---dragoness
  70. Re:No, she doesn't. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    the same is true for all groups. Go to any main stream blog these days and you will see hundreds of comments like yours, as well as plenty of insults towards white people. "White privilege" - a term that means nothing you say matters because you are white and cant possibly understand me, all while at the same time not realizing that if they believe what they are saying, they cant ever understand what its like to be a white person either, so they are hypocritical making the statement you cant talk for me, but i can talk for you

    plus all the german nazi jokes, polish jokes, irish jokes, (all white people)

    Long story short on the internet, everyone is treated equal, but as in real life, only some people actually bitch about it

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  71. anger? by aidian · · Score: 1

    There are an awful lot of comments here from guys sound pretty angry at a female having the audacity to not like rape and death threats for being online and visible, railing against "feminism" and the such. That's not really a community that I really care to be a part of.

    Sex crimes are a real thing, and they're scary as hell. Yeah, people tend to talk big and spout crap that they'll never, ever go through with when cloaked behind anonymity of the net, but that doesn't make it any less scary to the recipient, to the point of downright horrifying when received over and over and over and over again. It's a completely legitimate complaint. I can't imagine, I don't -want- to imagine, being in that position myself. Nobody should have to put up with that, and asking the guys perpetuating this to tone it the fuck down is utterly reasonable.

  72. Re:Problem with article by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    point being??

    women like using their looks to get ahead in the world, but if you call them on it, you are the sexist

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  73. A prescription by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    There isn't really an obvious prescription. You can educate people all you want about not saying offensive things, but a small handful of people will continue to say offensive things because they're trying to be offensive.

    Sensitivity training teaches the insensitive exactly how to push the buttons of the sensitive. And that's about all it does.

    There's an old prescription, that may still be the best available: "Do not feed the trolls."

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  74. Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The headline should read: Over-sensitive feminist assholes seeks special treatment within the game industry.

    In the words of Boyd Rice:

    I'm not a tolerant person

    In fact I get more intolerant by the day

    I just find it more and more difficult to tolerate assholes

    As my tolerance decreases, their numbers seem to increase

    Every day there's more and more of them

    And every day I have less and less patience

    I'm not a mere bigot

    But I certainly don't cut any slack to anyone on the merit of their status as an oppressed minority

    Your people were enslaved? Tough luck

    The white man stole your land? Too fuckin' bad

    Your fair sex is plagued by date rape? Grin and bear it

    These days everyone has a sob story, and frankly, I don't care

    It's no excuse for being an asshole

    We live in the age of the excuse

    We live in the age of the asshole

    They're everywhere

    They come in all shapes, all sizes, all colors

    There are black assholes, white assholes, women assholes, men assholes, queer assholes, straight assholes, smart assholes, stupid assholes, suburban assholes, inner-city assholes, homeless assholes, upwardly-mobile assholes, lazy assholes, incompetent assholes, sloppy assholes, anal assholes

    And so it goes, ad nauseum

    Why should I tolerate any of them?

    Why should I tolerate anything I don't care for, for any length of time?

    Why should I pretend it's okay?

    I don't like assholes

    Don't like talking to them; don't like talking about them

    Don't like knowing them; don't like knowing about them, or their thoughts, or their deeds

    Assholes are like bad ideas

    You let even a single one into your life, it can begin to ruin things

    It can destroy what's good, and foster much that's bad

    Why tolerate that?

    Tolerance was a virtue once; no more

    There aren't enough hours in the day to tolerate all the assholes

    To tolerate all the indignities hurled your way and still be able to live a decent life

    Perhaps Goethe said it best: that which disturbs your soul, you must not suffer

    Remember that when it seems like assholes are hard at work to disturb your soul 24 hours a day

    Take a tip from Mr. Intolerance: don't permit them to

  75. Re:No, she doesn't. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    These complaints aren't of random griefing on forums. These complaints are of people who aren't content with just insulting people, but who track them down. Wu got insulting email and a threat backed by research on how to execute it. Nina had people track down her website and post hate mail on it. Nicole I don't know enough to judge. Elise writes about being physically restrained at a gaming event, and being sent chapters of pornographic fanfic anonymously. Carolyn seems to be dealing with the abuse.

    This seems to me to be largely different from being insulted and threatened on a gaming channel.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  76. Re:It's about "control", guys by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    A woman's body, right, and choice are not a man's responsibility, so I hope you're happy with the progress in the world.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  77. Re:The fine art of male bonding. by Zxern · · Score: 1

    That's because women don't confront each other directly. They're far more viscous and nasty behind the other persons back than any man is face to face and they hold grudges far longer.

  78. Re:No, she doesn't. by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

    Ya, that's *stalking* but well, stalking already has a prescription in law.

    Naturally the international nature of the internet somewhat limits what you can do, and discovering that people making threats are basically children wouldn't do you any favours either.

    Nina had people track down her website and post hate mail on it.

    Don't have a website if you don't want racist, biggoted or threatening comments. I'm a game developer and a university professor, and well, students who don't like their grades seem to turn off the filter when e-mailing to a private account.

    Elise writes about being physically restrained at a gaming event

    That's what security is for. There's nothing here about 'women in __________' that's 'if you threaten someone for any reason the police will be called' territory.

    The post is essentially cherry picking extreme cases. Ask any woman who has had a stalker if it's a good experience and the answer will be a definitive no. But you're not going to prevent stalking completely through education, no more than you can completely eliminate murder either. 4 hand picked examples of extreme cases is hardly the basis of serious policy discussion on a broad issue.

  79. Re:It's about "control", guys by shilly · · Score: 1

    Seriously? What kind of man (as opposed to scummy arsehole) doesn't want to help pay for their child? Their own flesh-and-blood?

  80. Re:The fine art of male bonding. by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    Then when you went to HR you should have documented the incident, asked if there was any professional advice they would like to document on the subject, and asked for a resolution on the spot from the HR lead. Then demand an entry be made into the employee's folder noting that she has refused to complete a rudimentary part of expected job performance and tried to cover the issue up by exploiting a performance demand with harassment. Amazingly, all of this can be accomplished with good demeanor.

  81. Re:The fine art of male bonding. by nurd68 · · Score: 1

    I took a slightly different approach.

    I quit and went to work for a company doing embedded Linux devices (which I like much more than PHP web development) and making $20k more.

  82. Re:It's about "control", guys by shilly · · Score: 1

    Run that by me again, would you?

    "I'm sorry, little baby that I helped create, and for whom I feel some sense of obligation because I'm a human being and not a fuckwitted prick, but my real dumbassed misreading of Adam Smith and rage against the ladeeyz means I won't provide for your future."

  83. Re:Tl;dr she will change her mind tomorrow by DrGamez · · Score: 1

    Ignorant.
    Please stop posting in the future, thanks.