Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Where Do You Stand on Daylight Saving Time?

New submitter gbcox links to this article about how the switch between Standard Time and Daylight Saving Time can be dangerous, but writes Personally, I favor year 'round DST — I like the extra sunlight in the evening... but regardless, I just wish we'd pick one and stop futzing with the time twice a year. As it is right now, we only have about 4 months of standard time as it is... is it really worth the effort to switch the clocks for only four months? I think not. Where do you stand? If you have a strong opinion, it would be nice if you start your subject line in comments with "For it!" or "Against it!" If you think that the yearly clock-shifting is a good idea, when do you think each shift should occur? For those not keeping score, tonight is the switchover time for most Americans.

613 comments

  1. I'll take that bait by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't care what the offset is from GMT, just leaveitthehellalone. If businesses need winter hours, they can have those.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:I'll take that bait by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep, "National Fuck with the Clocks" Day (Which is of course twice a year) needs to just go away.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:I'll take that bait by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not national. Arizona realized how pointless and retarded the whole thing is 40 years ago, and hasn't done it since.

    3. Re:I'll take that bait by chipschap · · Score: 2

      Hawai`i likewise. Never did that stuff here.

    4. Re:I'll take that bait by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not exactly true. The Navajo Nation within Arizona uses DST, because the reservation spans 3 states (the other two of which observe DST). Oddly, however, the Hopi have a reservation completely surrounded by the Navajo reservation, and they don't follow DST.

    5. Re:I'll take that bait by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't care what the offset is from GMT, just leaveitthehellalone. If businesses need winter hours, they can have those.

      The problem is it doesn't work that way. Businesses are timed to suit the population and within regulations, populations live to suit businesses. You can't say just let everyone do a free for all because a typical shop can't open from 7-3 and have the same customers as the 8-4 range.

      I don't care because I can start and stop work whenever I want. In summer I go to work at 6 and in winter at 7:30-8ish to maximise my day. But not everyone has that option. If I were working for a shop that forces a 9-5 working day I would have very strong feelings about daylight savings time. Given that in the summer we have 2 hours of sunlight which are effectively unusable due to noise restrictions in early hours of the morning, and lack of sun after work.

    6. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Businesses are timed to suit the population and within regulations, populations live to suit businesses. You can't say just let everyone do a free for all because a typical shop can't open from 7-3 and have the same customers as the 8-4 range.

      Yes, actually you can, and they do exactly that. Some businesses already have 'winter' and 'summer' hours.

      The issue is not businesses, but Government offices, and Union shops, which have regulations and contract requirements which simply say things like "8am to 5pm is regular hours, everything else is naughty". It's "easier" to add a regulation which changes the Time than it is to update all those laws, regulations, and contracts to shift an hour in the spring/fall, which is why it's done.

      And my pet peeve is people saying they "get an extra hour" of daylight. No, you don't get an extra hour, it doesn't change the amount of light available, you're just getting off work (or going to work) at a different time. The original excuse for it was to save energy due to use of indoor lighting, the idea was to keep the majority of the workforce working during hours with natural light. But that was all done in a Day & Age when the job market was largely made of manufacturing jobs, and the idea of a 24 hour store was almost completely unheard of outside a few niche industries. In the current Era, daylight savings really doesn't lead to any significant change in energy usage because our habits as a society have drastically changed, and so has our labor force.

    7. Re:I'll take that bait by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care what the offset is from GMT, just leaveitthehellalone. If businesses need winter hours, they can have those.

      Anyone who thinks DST is easy obviously hasn't done stuff worldwide.

      Because I've just had to deal with one customer in 4 different timezones - one in the US (Eastern time), one in Portugal (Western European) and the Netherlands (Central Europe).

      And it was a weekly teleconference call. We had Portugal already in regular time )WET), but the Netherlands was moving from Central European Summer Time to Central European Time, while us in North America were still in DST.

      Endless fun figuring out a convenient time for the meeting when DST transitions randomly for different people. For those curious, WET is UTC+0000, CET is UTC+0100, WEST is UTC+0100, CEST is UTC+0200. And we had to deal with PDT (UTC-0700), EDT (UTC-0400) as usual.

      Oh yay, now we have DST over. One last time to figure out the meeting times and this unnecessary form of calculation can be put to rest for a few months (seriously, when they all switch at different times it's meant recalculating the time weekly).

      FYI - Outlook sets the meeting time to always be whoever sends the meeting invitation out regardless of DST. So if they set it to 8AM PT, it will be 8AM PST, 8AM PDT, and whatever else that works out to be - so the meeting organizer's time stays at 8, while everyone else has to deal with a meeting that has moved an hour earlier/later. Very important if your customer says they want the meeting at 1pm their time.

      I say get rid of it. International dealings get complex quickly.

    8. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho'mo

    9. Re:I'll take that bait by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If businesses need winter hours, they can have those.

      That's crazy! Next thing you know you'll claim my Home Depot will be closing an hour earlier during the winter. This could never work! We need DC politicians to schedule our business hours or there will be mass chaos!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re: I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI the whole EU changes the clocks at the same time (0100 UTC, last Sunday in October).

    11. Re:I'll take that bait by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Businesses opening at different times is actually a bit more convenient for the people working there. If everything is open 9-5 and I work 9-5, I can only go and buy the things I need on a day off. If a third of businesses are 8-4, 9-5, and 10-6 each, however, I can visit 2/3 of those businesses any day. It would also reduce rush hour traffic.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:I'll take that bait by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      UK businesses stick to 9-5 quite rigidly, and it's a pain in the arse. By the time most people finish work the shops are closed. In Japan shops usually open until 7 or 8 in the evening, often starting at 10 or 11 AM if they are small. It's fine because everyone is going to work in the morning and those who don't work can get on with chores, or just use supermarkets and convenience stores that are open 24/7 anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:I'll take that bait by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

      Yes! Do it or don't do it, but quit coinfusing the foo out of us twice a year. I wonder what impact on the GNP these twice a year changes have?

    14. Re:I'll take that bait by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      It gets worse the farther north you go. I live near Toronto and summer is ~5:30am to 9pm. Winter 8-5 (which means with a commute it is dark when I leave for work and dark when I get out of work). I lived in Germany for a while and they had it even worse. About 5-9:30pm in summer and 8-4 in the winter. Stores kept pretty strictly to 9-5 hours and were closed on Sundays. So all shopping effectively had to happen on Saturday. I just don't see much point in retail being open during the 9-5 window but not afterwards. Sure people that are retired or with the day off can still shop which is good for them. But if they offset themselves from normal office hours everyone, including those that are retired would be able to shop. My understanding is it is an equitable quality of life thing in Germany whenever I brought it up someone would just say "yeah but the people in the stores want to go home at 5, and no one likes to work on Sunday too just like you get to". The difference is I work in an office programming, they work to sell things to customers which (should IMO) require them to adjust themselves to when customers are available. Mah.

      As much as possible I think we should just let everyone work flexible hours and adjust their day however they want as the seasons go. Most people have a lot of routine work they can do without needing to coordinate with other people (or the groups that need to coordinate could agree amongst themselves what hours they want to work rather than having a company wide policy for it) or deal with customers. Let them move that to the beginning, middle/end of the day depending on when they want to come in. With the exception of banks most stores are opening ~8-10am and till 8-10pm at night which means everything but complicated banking needs can be done every day. Still would be nice if banks/government services would offset themselves too, say open 11-7pm or something so people working 9-5 could still see someone after work. In short: customer facing jobs need to offset themselves from typical hours for non-customer facing jobs. Those who aren't customer facing should be treated as mature adults and work the hours that allow them to be the most productive.

    15. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so when you're staying in Tuba City and check out is 11am, it's really 10 and they like to ding you with a late check out.

    16. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UTC for everybody

    17. Re:I'll take that bait by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      I agree. Lived in Germany for a couple years. Daylight savings started a couple weeks different there so there was a window where calling home was -5hrs instead of the usual -6. My family couldn't wrap their head around it so every call started with: "so what time is it over there?". Any time savings having people working in "more productive hours" (like that is a constant for everyone) is probably lost by the effort figuring out what hours you can call someone. Those that don't do business that crosses timezones it doesn't really matter either way coordination wise. Everyone else it just adds another layer of complexity of determining what time it is.

      Maybe we need to take the same approach we do when calling family overseas: not insist on a 8hr window to call eachother. Instead divide the world up into say 4-6 business timezones. "Business hours" for companies doing business in the adjacent timezones offset themselves by a couple hours from normal so they have that overlap with the other guys and respect the fact that just because it is 9am here doesn't mean it is okay to call India now. If you aren't in a position where you need to interact with the other business timezones: do whatever you want. Rather than DST it would have been nicer if they had come up with a standard "coordination time" for these big groupings of timezones. We'd have whole continents agreeing that (adjust for your local time) say 8am-10am is when you call people 1 quarter to the east, 3-5pm is when you call people 1 quarter to the west etc. Your quadrant + the two on either side would have standard business hours to contact eachother. People that are truly on the the other side of the world would have to figure something out (if they are really actively communicating they probably end up like Indian call centers: doing customer facing work during the other guys afterhours so their competitive advantage is exactly the fact that their hours aren't yours).

    18. Re:I'll take that bait by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Because drunks don't know to go to the bar before midnight on weekdays and that after midnight is okay Fri-Sat :) When people need something they figure out when it is available. If it really isn't available when they need it they'll kick up a stink/stop buying from them and companies will correct, or new companies providing "extended hours" service (perhaps at a premium) will open. DST needs to go, it makes no sense. It is based on a time when we cared if the sun was out to do work. Guess what? People doing road maintenance adjust their hours just fine with the weather even without the government telling them they need to wait for the sun to come out before they can see what they are doing. Offices generally have the lights on all day so the sun being out isn't saving any power. Etc.

      DST wasn't even very useful during war time as far as I can tell. Do you really think we'd have stopped building tanks 12hrs a day if the sun wasn't out when we woke up? Heck 12hrs a day: I bet most war industries were running 3 shifts so for them DST didn't matter. You couldn't ship the hydroelectric power overseas so conserving energy over here didn't help the war effort. Things were just silly during the war people had this need to flog themselves to feel like they were suffering for "the boys overseas". Ration tea and sugar: I'm sure the guy getting shot at with an MG42 felt better that you didn't have any tea for breakfast and you got up an hour earlier.

    19. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since who was it Obamarama? fucked with DST changeover again, teh kiddies have been walking(the 1 or 2 that do) to school already for several weeks now, and still will be again in a few more, so the light for teh kiddies holds no water here...

      I'd just rather have more light in the evening when it's on my free time.

    20. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, it's primarily only the local smalltime mom&pop shops that are only open 9-5, 10-4, or some other variation thereof, none open later than 6, and very few that open prior to 9a. Hell even some of the local shops and restaurants are only open 5 or 6d/w (Usually closed S/M or M(the smarter ones who don't want to lose out on weekend business) but thats only a small subset as even most small restaurants(well read non-chain) are open 7d/w now with decent hours, mostly 10a-10p ish with some crazy pizza joints that even on the weekends don't open until after 4p but those are usually 4p-12 or so.

      But still I can't tell you how many times that I wanted to order a pizza from a particular place earlier in the day but couldn't because they don't bother to open until 4p OTOH they're also in locations unlike to get foot lunch traffic and would likely have to subsist on delivery/carryout orders which might not be sustainable for them. These are mostly small places and they have surprisingly good pizza given that they're WAY cheaper than anything but little sleazers cardboard lukewarm and kinda ready....)

      The big chain stores, usually open 9-10a and close 9-10p. 9a-9p used to be stabdard but some stores are doing 10a-9p, 9a-10p, etc. which is a real bitch when I forget that store X doesn't open until 10a now and show up before 10a. Then there are the even crazier Christmas season hours, they're almost to 24/7 now...

    21. Re: I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was George W Bush.

    22. Re:I'll take that bait by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Oddly, however, the Hopi have a reservation completely surrounded by the Navajo reservation, and they don't follow DST.

      The Hopi and Navajo are historic blood enemies. (I understand the Navajo word for "Hopi" means "Dead man".)

      That the Hopi would do something opposite from the Navajo does not surprise me at all.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    23. Re:I'll take that bait by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, but the other issue is that the Hopi reservation is actually in Arizona, so it makes sense for them to just do what the rest of the state is doing (though a component of that may be thumbing their noses at the Navajo neighbors). The Navajo, however, are not in Arizona: their reservation spans three states. So for them, it was either follow AZ and ignore DST, or follow the other two states and follow DST. Personally I think they should have followed AZ, but given that NM follows DST and much of their population lives on the NM side, it probably made economic sense to do that.

    24. Re:I'll take that bait by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      It's even worse when you have some people in the Southern Hemisphere. It's summer there when it's winter here and vice versa, so the clock changes happen both on different dates and in opposite directions.

    25. Re: I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even more fun if you need to contact someone in Australia - daylight saving runs from the first Sunday in October to the first Sunday in April, but Western Australia, Northern Territory, and Queensland don't observe it, Northern Territory and South Australia are 1.5 hours ahead of Western Australia and half an hour behind the southeastern states (standard time), and depending where you're calling there can be 4 different time offsets at different times of the year.

    26. Re:I'll take that bait by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      That does sound like a pain. In the US it is a given that any reasonably large business will typically be open till 9:00 pm, and many smaller shops as well.

        I do recall working at a privately held sporting goods shop back in the late '70s. We were pushed into opening on Sundays due to the competition doing so. None of us sold any more; we simply spread our week's sales over one extra day. But, as a consumer, I'm honestly willing to pay a bit extra at the register for the extra hours.

    27. Re:I'll take that bait by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I don't have a stand on DST or Standard time. I stand on the floor. I have a stand for my pictures, etc.
      I would like to have one timezone for all of North America. 8am everywhere. Use the existing Central time as the reference.
      I prefer to have Darkness in the AM and a later sundown.

      Kids never play for an hour or two before school, but do so after school. So, for their safety and to extend outdoor playing time in daylight, lets keep DST all year round.
       

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    28. Re:I'll take that bait by Ghaoth · · Score: 1

      The problem with most daylight saving schemes is that they are based on location, not latitude. People living in the tropics don't need daylight saving since the variation is small enough to be ignored. If societies in latitudes outside the tropics want the change, go for it but base the delimitation on latitude, not arbitrary geopolitical or business boundaries.

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
    29. Re:I'll take that bait by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      It would be a pain if it were true. Most of the shops in my part of the UK stay open till six and often later.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    30. Re:I'll take that bait by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Indiana is so stupid we just jumped on the bandwagon afew years back... :(

    31. Re:I'll take that bait by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The problem with most daylight saving schemes is that they are based on location, not latitude. People living in the tropics don't need daylight saving since the variation is small enough to be ignored. If societies in latitudes outside the tropics want the change, go for it but base the delimitation on latitude, not arbitrary geopolitical or business boundaries.

      DST is only useful for the mid-latitudes. At the tropics and northern latitudes, DST is useless. At the tropics, yes, the variation is practically nil for all intents and purposes. At the northern cap, when the sun comes up at 4:30AM and sets at 9PM, movement makes no difference (do you really want it 5:30 to 10PM? Most people will have trouble sleeping). Although having it at 4:30AM means early morning commuters do get the benefit of light during their commute rather than commute in the dark. Then there's the whole midnight sun thing.

      Heck, in Canada, the southernmost edge actually technically never becomes night in the summer (civil twilight, nautical twilight and astronomical twilight, to which it never leaves in the summer to become official night).

    32. Re:I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds a pain. Most chain stores in the US are open until quite late - many never close, and those that do close at 9 or 10 PM.

    33. Re:I'll take that bait by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Too bad Indiana recently started...

    34. Re:I'll take that bait by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Most UK high street shops are open until 7-8pm every day, often later on Thursdays.
      Most UK supermarkets are open 24/7 (except Sundays when it's 9-4 or 10-5).

      Small supermarkets (below a certain size) can open until 10-11pm.

    35. Re:I'll take that bait by pls · · Score: 1

      The Navajo Nation has stronger ties to Denver and Albuquerque than to Phoenix and sets their time accordingly.

  2. I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by NixieBunny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We don't celebrate DST in Tucson, but all my distant suppliers etc. do, so I have to adjust my mental clock to deal with their different offsets.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by TWX · · Score: 1

      There's an idea to shift PST regions to MST (as they are when operating on PDT) and to shift either Central to Eastern, or Eastern to Central, basically putting the Continental United States on to two timezones, either one or two hours apart.

      I like the idea of this. Given that TV schedules in Eastern and Central are often marketed as "Eight, Seven Central", it looks like Central time is already operating as Eastern time anyway. May as well just formalize it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try dealing with World Wide teams that do DST at diff times, or even folks further south that do the "reverse" of our DST...

      I also live in Tucson and *HATE* DST, the entire concept is evil, and should go away.

      I also support the idea of making the 48 states two time zones instead of four.

      http://qz.com/142199/the-us-needs-to-retire-daylight-savings-and-just-have-two-time-zones-one-hour-apart/

    3. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      TV schedules? Like, from the 20th century? My grandfather read about those in a history book once! People use to schedule their lives around entertainment which was, get this, broadcast to everyone at the same time. Weird, right? It's true, the past is a foreign country.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I do not envy you. Not only do you have to deal with people in other time zones switching, you probably have to deal with fucktards in, say, Utah, who don't understand that they are no longer in Mountain Standard Time, they are in Mountain Daylight Time.

      Well, in the spring anyway. Tomorrow they will be back in MST.

    5. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by PAjamian · · Score: 5, Informative

      We don't celebrate DST in Tucson, but all my distant suppliers etc. do, so I have to adjust my mental clock to deal with their different offsets.

      Try living in New Zealand and having clients in California. Since NZ is in the southern hemisphere our summer is during your winter and vice-versa, so during our summer (and your winter) we are three hours apart* from US/Pacific, but during our winter and your summer we are five hours apart and in-between there is about a month where DST overlaps in both fall and spring and we are four hours apart.

      * Actually 21 hours, but it's easier to think of it as us being a day ahead and three hours behind.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    6. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by bvdp · · Score: 1

      I'm not in Tuscon, but we have the same problem. We don't change back and forth (which saves me having to change all my clocks!) but nearby towns do. So, twice a year we have to adjust to other folks new time. A total pain. Just leave the clocks alone. And if you have the need for more daylight ... well, then get your ass out of bed earlier.

    7. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      We don't celebrate DST in Tucson, but all my distant suppliers etc. do, so I have to adjust my mental clock to deal with their different offsets.

      I'm the opposite: *I* don't use DST, and I have to spend most of the year reminding myself that "those idiots" think it's an hour later than it is.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts disagrees with your 2-timezone idea: they're talking about moving from EST to the Atlantic timezone (GMT-4).

    9. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's true, the past is a foreign country.

      Or the current one, if you choose to avoid streaming and DVR-like devices. Funny how TV isn't even close to dead, and people like you are talking like it died out more than 2 generations ago. Unless....are you from the future? How is the year 2100 treating you? Have the monkeys taken over yet, or is there still just unrest amongst the macaques?

    10. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 1

      I think that you're out of touch. Sure, plenty of people TiVo their drama programs or just download them. But tens of millions of Americans schedule their Sundays around their team's football game and their weeknights around basketball, baseball, hockey, and soccer. Live sports are still a multi-billion dollar industry and will be for at least several more decades.

    11. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: they don't have winter in California.

    12. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I'm still struggling with this concept having anything to do with TiVo. Prime time viewing here is 7pm regardless of how the timezones change. Yes people across the border get the shows an hour early but then people east of us always have too, and the USA seems to get them like 3 weeks earlier so it all doesn't matter.

    13. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by bemasher · · Score: 1

      I always find the word "celebrate" humorous in this context. Having grown up in AZ and moved to another state, I really miss the absence of DST.

    14. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      I used to that. Might again. But, now that I have a job where I have to deal with other people regularly, I decided that the risk of missing a meeting (which happened to me on more than one occasion during the 5 years or so I did this) was not worth it.

      It's still stupid, though.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    15. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, regardless, you're always at least a dollar short.

    16. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: they don't have winter in California.

      What are you? A hipster? Protip, indeed.

    17. Re: I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well screw those people...

    18. Re:I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by dj245 · · Score: 1

      TV schedules? Like, from the 20th century? My grandfather read about those in a history book once! People use to schedule their lives around entertainment which was, get this, broadcast to everyone at the same time. Weird, right? It's true, the past is a foreign country.

      Broadcast to everyone at the same time? You mean like Multicast? How did they ever get that working right on all the myriad of different router models?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    19. Re: I live in Arizona, and it's a pain by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      Agree with you. People in AZ know life is better w/o DST.

  3. I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Beck_Neard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DST or the people who constantly whine about it.

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    1. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I hear a lot of complaining about daylight savings time, but I really don't hear much in the way of support in favor of it. That inclines me to believe that people really don't support it, but because it's not completely horrible the movement to abolish it hasn't managed to gain that much traction.

      I don't live where DST is used, so I can't really say either way how I feel about it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Sene · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have never lived in an area where DST is not used and so far I think it is utterly useless.

    3. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it implies most people don't give a fuck, after all is said and done it's just an arbitrary number used to mark events. Although I'm always surprised at how many people know the exact time of the train they catch to work, personally I have no idea, I go to the station a train turns up within 10min and I get on it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by aynoknman · · Score: 2

      DST or the people who constantly whine about it.

      They may constantly complain, but they only go berserk twice a year.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    5. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I care about it even less now that I don't have to change my own clocks. I barely notice it now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I greatly appreciate extra hours outside in the evening, and the ability to leave work while it's still light outside as a counter to winter doldrums. I would support moving permanently to DST except that means kids have to wait for the bus in the dark for a few months, which no one supports.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to complain about the schedule that I work, and the schedule the schools keep with regard to when the sun is up and down too. I just don't expect the government to fix this for me... (well maybe the schools if they are public schools)

      If you don't like your hours, Deal with it. If you don't like your kids, let them go play in traffic in the dark...
      We should not need to all change to accommodate the whims of some of us... unless of course the "some of us" that are being accommodated are the ones that have the money to lobby the government, then clearly we should do what those people say, otherwise how would we get all of those election commercials we all hate broadcast every two years.

    8. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then start school later on the dark days. Why is there such an opposition to businesses changing hours with the seasons, rather than changing the clocks?

    9. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      So above the arctic circle they shouldn't go to school at all in the mid of the winters? =P

    10. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      This. School often ends at 3 in the afternoon anyway, so why not shift everything one hour off? As it is the students are ending up stuck at school after classes doing homework or whatever because the parents aren't home.

    11. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by pjbgravely · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would love to see the opposite, there is way too much daylight in the summer, but very little night sky for someone trapped in first shift like I. In the winter it would be nice to have at least an hour of sunlight when you get home for snowblowing.

      In the summer it would be nice to have some dark before bed. I have been forced to sleep a few hours after work so I can get some time in the dark each day.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    12. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      DST or the people who constantly whine about it.

      Tell it to doctors and nurses at your hospital, oh boy do they whine over it and for good cause. In my neck of the woods we usually see a 10-20% increase in the number of heart attack patients during the first week. DST doesn't *do* anything except make people sick, and sometimes if they're unlucky kill them. There was a study posted a few years back on it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 2

      Then start school later on the dark days.

      That'll go over well with working parents...

    14. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >In the winter it would be nice to have at least an hour of sunlight when you get home for snowblowing.

      This is easy: go to work an hour earlier, and then go home an hour earlier. If your employer doesn't let you do this, then find a new job, or live with it. Asking the government to force everyone to change their clocks because your employer is an idiot is just asinine.

    15. Re: I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Narrowband · · Score: 2

      I'm an amateur astronomer, I want as many hours of darkness in the evening as I can get.

    16. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I hear a lot of complaining about daylight savings time, but I really don't hear much in the way of support in favor of it. That inclines me to believe that people really don't support it, but because it's not completely horrible the movement to abolish it hasn't managed to gain that much traction.

      Observer bias. One of things people struggle to deal with is identifying if something is good or bad based on complaints. Complainers are vocal. Supporters are typically just happy to sit by and be along for the ride.

      Then there's demographics. In my city daylight savings time has an incredible amount of support, so that's all I hear about. Yet every time the debate comes up we lose due to all the farmers and country boys out west who are against it because (insert strange reason like cows not coping with changing milking times here). Those are the same people who aren't active on social networks or the internet. So for some reason you look into the newspaper you see nothing but negativity, look online and you'll see only positive things.

      It wouldn't be such a debate if there was a majority distributed evenly.

    17. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Co-ordination and local laws. It's one thing open up an hour early, it's quite another to have people expect it and actually get business in that extra hour.

    18. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Only really matters for retail. Everything else it doesn't matter for.

    19. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Bah, last time they held a meeting on it, 50% of parents complained school started too early, the other 50% it started too late. 0% said it was just right. It doesn't matter what you'll do, it'll go over poorly with parents.

    20. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of the Daylight/Standard switch-overs, but if the alternative is to go all Standard Time, all the time, I'll put up with the twice-yearly switchovers.

    21. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then start school later on the dark days. Why is there such an opposition to businesses changing hours with the seasons, rather than changing the clocks?

      Because they WON'T. And they never will. They just will NOT have different hours for different seasons, especially if you work in a corporate environment like any desk job.

      This whole kerfuffle happens because yes, it actually IS easier to change society's entire concept of the hour of the day rather than have businesses change hours as daylight changes.

    22. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I sort of don't give a fuck.

      However, I do enjoy the perks of it being daylight when the youngest of the kids going to school in my area and are out waiting on the buss. It's still dark when the high school kids catch their rides. But for the last few days, the younger kids have had to walk to the bus stop in the dark and starting Monday, it will be daylight or lighter out. Makes it easier to see them when they run out in traffic to avoid having to walk in the drainage ditches.

      That's about the only benefit I see around here and it doesn't even effect me because I'm usually gone before then anyways. It just sucks to hear about one of them stepping too far into the road and something bad happening. I'm too far out of town for sidewalks yet close enough that the kids still walk to a central point to be picked up.

    23. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I greatly appreciate extra hours outside in the evening, and the ability to leave work while it's still light outside as a counter to winter doldrums. I would support moving permanently to DST except that means kids have to wait for the bus in the dark for a few months, which no one supports.

      How about you just get your Boss to change your shift so you go to work an hour earlier and go home an hour earlier?

    24. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's silly. And inaccurate (mostly). Business hours don't have to change to change working hours. Only a few people need be at a corporation, like the receptionist, for it to be "open".

    25. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Belgium they should change business hours for shops anyway. Why should everybody be working at the same time? This causes many people to be only able to do shopping on saturday.

      The opening hours are from a time where many women were still at home doing the shopping.

      Banks are especially bad. If I need to go to them, I need a day off.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    26. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      My impression is businesses are doing this more because employees enjoy that additional freedom. It's a great perk with little downside for many types of jobs. It has a practical side-effect as well, which is to avoid pushing everyone onto the freeways at the same time twice each day. That's pretty much a guaranteed way to cause daily gridlock, as no freeway system is built for absolute maximum capacity.

      Obviously, this doesn't work for some types of jobs, but it seems to be pretty much standard practice in my industry. Most companies I've worked for either had explicit or implied "core hours" where you need to be at the office, so that people can schedule meetings, etc, but other than that, it's up to you when you come in and get your work done. Some people preferred being at the office at 7am, while others came in at 11am. Nearly everyone avoided the rush hour if they could possibly help it, of course.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    27. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by mrbester · · Score: 2

      That's the justification given: the poor kiddies have to go to school in the dark. This conveniently forgets that if you alter the time so that didn't happen (for the three weeks it takes for that hour to be cancelled out) they are coming home in the dark instead. But that's logic, which has no place here.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    28. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      False. Retail is useless if everyone else is at work or not yet in the local vicinity. Retail often relies on business to bring in people at certain times.

      I.e. you change the business times, and the retail will follow. i.e. Most trade stores open at 6:30am so the builders who start at 7 can get their crap in the morning. Most supermarkets open at 9 so they can service customers at 6pm on the way home from work. The standard business hours are otherwise fixed and retail works around them where they are allowed to (back to local laws point).

    29. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by smallfries · · Score: 1

      The permanent fix is incredibly simple (not my idea, it was in a stand-up routine) :

      Move the clocks 30 minutes. Stop. Don't ever change them again.

      It would be good enough to stop most of the arguments.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    30. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So then hours at retail will move. Problem solved.

    31. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, one had "core hours" regardless of where you worked. Something like 10 to 3, you had to "be available" regardless of where you were (working from home or the office was equivalent).

      It's nice working in IT. More flexibility. But I've seen it work with finance and other departments as well.

    32. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My rant about bus schedules is: why do they even bother to print bus schedules? Maybe in the morning they're valid when nothing's broken with traffic and the driver assignments didn't just shuffle, but in the evening they're complete fabrications! You figure out which bus to wait for (each of three going your direction stopping at a different location half or a block away, of course, for "efficiency" - "just check the schedule to find the next one you should walk to!") by paying attention and seeing which ones actually turn up during rush hour!

    33. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That inclines me to believe that people really don't support it, but because it's not completely horrible the movement to abolish it hasn't managed to gain that much traction.

      it is completely horrible, but it's not very horrible. it only kills a few dozen people each year. that's not very high on the modern horrible scale. something has to kill a whole bunch of people before we give a half a shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Although I'm always surprised at how many people know the exact time of the train they catch to work, personally I have no idea, I go to the station a train turns up within 10min and I get on it.

      Amazing. You must live in NYC. Because in SF, you go to the station on a bus which is late, a train turns up eventually, and you get to work late.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is there such an opposition to businesses changing hours with the seasons, rather than changing the clocks?

      Let's see...

      Businesses change their hours twice a year, more or less at the times we now change the clocks...

      Or we change the clocks...

      Sounds like basically the same thing in terms of annoyance value (trivial), since if YOUR business changes hours, you'll still have to adjust your sleep schedule to deal with the new hours.

      In other words, six of one, half dozen of the other....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    36. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of the Daylight/Standard switch-overs, but if the alternative is to go all Standard Time, all the time, I'll put up with the twice-yearly switchovers.

      I do not understand why. If we went to Standard Time all the time, it is likely that there would be a change in our schedules. That is, everything would happen earlier.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    37. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I greatly appreciate extra hours outside in the evening, and the ability to leave work while it's still light outside as a counter to winter doldrums. I would support moving permanently to DST except that means kids have to wait for the bus in the dark for a few months, which no one supports.

      What you might no realize, is that you are now on Standard time. Those hours of daylight when you leave work would be there without DST as well.

    38. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by graphius · · Score: 1

      posting to remove a bad mod... twitchy mouse finger...

    39. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by greggman · · Score: 1

      I love DST. I hate non DST. I want daylight for my free time so the later it stay light after work the better.

    40. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not at any school I ever went to. At winter solistice, we'd arrive in the dark and get out at dusk.

      Can't find it again in my overcrowded inbox, but today on someone's blog there were a bunch of good stats on the effect of daylight savings on energy use. In short, with DST there's more energy used in the morning but less at night, with a net usage increase of about half a percent.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    41. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Yeah - my schedule is usually at the beck-and-call of half the world, anyway. Sometimes I start at 4AM (Israel), other times have meetings at 9 at night (China), others 7AM (India). My meetings dictate my work schedule already, and when Europe switches at a different time than the US my meeting schedule gets tossed into a blender.

    42. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      Actually I just got a new job, it only took me 20 years. Most jobs have strict start stop times to allow overlap with the other shifts. Mine is strict except on the weekend, but a 2 minute commute makes up for it. Most stores have shifts that change a lot but I couldn't sell you as $100 bill for 50 dollars.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    43. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Let's see... Businesses change their hours twice a year, more or less at the times we now change the clocks... Or we change the clocks...

      The business can do it if they want. What I expect in reality, is that business would adopt a slightly early time, year round.

    44. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, it's even more stupid. Our standard time is UTC, but we actively change to UTC+01:00 in winter, which means it gets dark by 4pm in the dead of winter. It's really depressing watching it go dark outside when you're still working.

      There was a private members bill before parliament to change to something more sensible, but it was rejected on the grounds of it not being fair on Scottish farmers ( who would have dark until 10:00 in December ), so we all have to suffer so a few hundred people don't have to change their ( flexible ) schedules.

    45. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      Changing the school time year-round would be quite different than just changing it on the dark days.

    46. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Because that's even more of a pain in the ass than DST for your average parent.

      Even the shift from my daughter going from elementary to middle school through off my schedule big time.

      Shifting my schedule throughout the year to get more day light is a pain in the ass.

    47. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then start school later on the dark days. Why is there such an opposition to businesses changing hours with the seasons, rather than changing the clocks?

      The problem is that only really works if we switch *everything* to start later. If my kids go to school later, I have to drop them off later (no urban bussing in my district, and I'm not making my 7 year old walk a mile and a half).

    48. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if we leave it up to businesses, it requires action (difficult) to adjust (beneficial). This means that some businesses would be lazy, and we'd have to keep track in our heads who switched hours and who hasn't. The current system requires inaction (easy) to adjust (beneficial) which makes it virtually assured that people won't adjust. I know of very few businesses that have "winter hours"...except for those related to retail sales, and that's unrelated because they're actually extending hours due to the Xmas shopping season, nothing to do with daylight.

    49. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sure, but if your complaint is "parents won't like it" first, I'd demand that you find a parent that did like it. If there are none today happy with the school time, the "they won't like it" would be irrelevant.

    50. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So the problem is that your school doesn't provide before-school care? Mine does. Maybe you should work on fixing the problem that needs fixing, rather than complaining about things that are essentially impossible.

    51. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      I have no complaint about it. Personally, I homeschool. School starts whenever I decide to get out of bed that day.
      I was simply pointing out that if times are different throughout the year for schools, it's going to make things difficult or impossible for parents with jobs. It's not about "liking" it, it's about parents' inability to be in two places at once.

    52. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's no more impossible than today's system. Might help push businesses to more flexible hours, something that's better for the environment by reducing the rush hour.

    53. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      Why would a business change to more flexible hours when they could just hire someone that doesn't have kids or who has a spouse/nanny/etc. to watch their kids?

      Most likely what would happen is that more people would hire nannies to take care of their children during the morning hours (resulting in MORE environmental damage because not only are the parents going to work, now more nannies are too), and families that could not afford a nanny would either have one parent quit their job or have "latchkey" kids. More laws would then be made against these latchkey kids, resulting in
      - more families getting "assistance" (because one parent is then FORCED to quit their job)
      - kids that are afraid to ask for help in emergencies (because asking for help makes it known that their parents aren't there).

      And anyway, do you really want to arrive at a business and be told "sorry, we aren't open yet - Mrs. Employee's kids had different hours today"? I sure don't.

    54. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And anyway, do you really want to arrive at a business and be told "sorry, we aren't open yet - Mrs. Employee's kids had different hours today"? I sure don't.

      Ah, you are deliberately being an ass. I thought you were just confused. How often do you turn up at the corporate offices of Proctor and Gamble looking for the marketing manager or something and show up at 8 a.m. unannounced and without an appointment?

      Ah yes, your problem would happen never. Yes, you managed to troll me, I thought you were discussing the issue, not leading me on with the intention of wasting both of our time.

    55. Re:I'm not sure what bothers me more, by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      The marketing manager of Proctor and Gamble can afford a nanny I'm sure. But the secretary that sits at the front of the building marking people off as they arrive for appointments - can she afford a nanny? The cashier at Dunkin Donuts, where many people like to stop for a coffee on their way to work? Sure, I'm the troll here @@

  4. I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

    Then wake up earlier! Futzing around with the clock doesn't change the length of the day. I loose a little more respect for the entire human race every year when I have to hear "more sunlight in the evening" again.

    1. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 0

      Hear hear!

      I get sick of the permanent BST brigade here in the UK... if they want to live on European time, they should bleeping well move to Europe!

    2. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Jamu · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I'd hate most would be the fact that Greenwich would never be on Greenwich Mean Time!

      --
      Who ordered that?
    3. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

      Then wake up earlier! Futzing around with the clock doesn't change the length of the day. I loose a little more respect for the entire human race every year when I have to hear "more sunlight in the evening" again.

      Umm... that doesn't change the time when people get off work. The reason most people want more light at the end of the day is so they don't have to drive home in the dark.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      I get sick of the permanent BST brigade here in the UK.../---/ they should bleeping well move to Europe!

      ... so the UK is not in Europe?

    5. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being on CET is the only sensible option for the UK. As it is we lose 2 hours of trading with the rest of Europe, and they're our largest trading partner. You'd have to get Ireland and Portugal to move too though, really.

    6. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just trade at the same time as Europe? What do you morons do when trading with the US or Asia?

    7. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just trade at the same time as Europe?

      Sure; businesses can open and close an hour earlier and everyone can come into work at different times. Then for the sake of convenience perhaps we can just change the clocks to be the same as the others guys. Oh wait.

      What do you morons do when trading with the US or Asia?

      We trade less with them.

    8. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by ranton · · Score: 2

      I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

      Then wake up earlier! Futzing around with the clock doesn't change the length of the day. I loose a little more respect for the entire human race every year when I have to hear "more sunlight in the evening" again.

      What kind of moron doesn't understand that some people have set work hours and it can't just shift their schedule however they want. Waking up early doesn't give you more sunlight at the end of your work day if you have to stay in the office until 5:30-6pm. And if you hate mornings, more sunlight in the morning is not a substitute.

      I could care less about sunlight in the evening, and also think it is a silly complaint, but your condemnation of it is far more overboard than their silly request.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    9. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... that doesn't change the time when people get off work.

      Neither does changing the clock. You're confusing the time with two different ways of marking it.

    10. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by TWX · · Score: 1

      I suspect that such a mentality helped establish why the British Isles were part of Oceania, not Eurasia, in 1984. Right now, the UK (and I think Ireland too) are not part of the same passport zone as the rest of the EU, the UK doesn't use the Euro either. Given their island nature, the UK appears to really not be part of Europe and seems to like maintaining its independence. After all, that independence has helped it several times, with the last successful invasion being almost a thousand years ago.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, but it does move the day underneath the PHB who's not happy till you're not happy. That is the actual problem, employers who believe changing business hours will bring a plague of locusts and the end of time.

    12. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure; businesses can open and close an hour earlier and everyone can come into work at different times.

      No, at the same time dumbass. Then you don't lose 2 hours.

      Then for the sake of convenience perhaps we can just change the clocks to be the same as the others guys.

      I don't trade with Europe; I don't give a shit. How about you just change your clock? Stick a big "CET" label on it, so you dumbasses don't get confused.

    13. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that making a change only works if we all do it together.
      By changing the official time, the government gets everybody to change. I think it's worth it.

    14. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by jxander · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sticking point is work. Any random Joe working 9 - 5 is going to get off work at 5, regardless of when he woke up.

      --
      This signature is false.
    15. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 0

      Then wake up earlier!

      Nobody in their right mind is going to wake up one minute earlier than necessary before work. And if they did, they'd have a looming deadline to get to work right as they start to get into whatever morning activity they're doing, which would negate much of the value of that time block.

      People worry about a few extra heart attacks once per year with DST. What about entire neighborhoods being woken up on mornings where some jackass early-riser thinks that the extra morning daylight hours would be a great time to mow their lawn and blow leaves? Who is going to count the heart attacks caused by that?

      Other people want to stay on permanent DST. Who is going to tabulate how many kids get run over going to school in pitch black mornings?

      DST as it's currently implemented works just fine. Keep it as it is.

    16. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't trade with Europe; I don't give a shit.

      Oh look another Little Englander "Don't affect me directly mate I don't give a shit init?"

      Look, you stupid fucking troglodite, the UK's largest trading partner is the EU. We're not a fucking nation of farmers any more; the vast majority of the UK's economy comes from trade and services. The more trade we do, the more money we make, the more money we have so Britain can be great and possibly pay for things like telecommunications infrastructure so that you and your friends can post your stupid and ill informed opinions on the internet.

      It is in Britains best interests to maximise our trade with Europe. That means businesses, mostly office workers, would be better off working the same hours as the CET countries. We can either all work 8-4, or we can just shift our clocks to CET and work 9-5 same as before.

      If it offends you just arrange your UKIP rallies an hour earlier and stick a big "GMT" label on it so you don't get confused.

    17. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

      Then wake up earlier! Futzing around with the clock doesn't change the length of the day. I loose a little more respect for the entire human race every year when I have to hear "more sunlight in the evening" again.

      Umm... that doesn't change the time when people get off work. The reason most people want more light at the end of the day is so they don't have to drive home in the dark.

      We move the clocks forward during the summer months. This adds an hour of daylight in the evening, but does so during the portion of the year in which the days are longest, so it's already light when people drive home. If people don't like driving home in the dark, we should move the clocks forward during the winter months, but that's when we set them back to normal.

    18. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      A lot of blue collar workers don't have the "luxury" of flexible work hours, getting up early won't change the length of daylight after they knock off for the day, the only option they have is to fuck around with the clock and make others get up early with them. White collar workers generally have a lot more flexibility.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    19. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Drive home in the dark? Surely not from work, because if that were the case DST does nothing to help the 5-7pm commute since you're already in daylight at that time of year anyway.

      If you don't want to drive home in the dark then you would be best to simply advance your time zone by one hour permanently so you get an extra hour of daylight in Winter, when you actually need it. Of course that means the morning commute is darker but that can't be solved without making winter working days shorter and I can't see that happening any time soon.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    20. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron doesn't understand that some people have set work hours and it can't just shift their schedule however they want.

      If their work hours were set, then daylight savings time would have no effect on the amount of sunshine they get. It's just that some workplaces change the time you go to work or leave work by one hour coincidentally at the same time that clocks are changed for daylight savings time.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    21. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go to work at the same time. That way you can maximize your trade with Europe. It's still not my problem you morons can't seem to figure out that 8-4 GMT is the same time as 9-5 CET. If that offends you stick a big "UKIP" label on your strawman and whine at that.

    22. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm... that doesn't change the time when people get off work. The reason most people want more light at the end of the day is so they don't have to drive home in the dark.

      Then change work hours.

      If that time shift is something that we really want, as a society, then that shouldn't be too hard. Heck, I've known businesses, churches, and other entities that had "summer hours" anyway, even with the clock shift.

      Or heck, legislate a shift in work hours. It's hardly more oppressive than legislating capricious changes in the freakin' clock

    23. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the winter in New England, DST or not makes little difference. Either way, I go to work in the dark, sit in a windowless office all day, and go home in the dark.

    24. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Then wake up earlier! Futzing around with the clock doesn't change the length of the day. I loose a little more respect for the entire human race every year when I have to hear "more sunlight in the evening" again.

      Your schedule is not completely under your own control, in all likelihood.

      Most people with jobs have to interact with other people with jobs and/or customers (who also are generally on some sort of schedule - especially if you're in IT). Your work schedule is usually not determined strictly by your own desires or wishes.

      If you're a parent, your schedule is likely somewhat constrained by your kid's daycare or school schedule. Daycare centers close at a specific time, and (speaking from past personal experience) it can be rather costly to have them stay later than that!

      In many places, transit has peak and non-peak schedules, and sometimes doesn't run at all after a certain time - especially if you don't live in the city where you work. In Seatttle, for instance, the last southbound Sounder train is at 6:12pm. The last northbound train is a half hour earlier than that. Currently there are some Sound Transit busses that more or less follow the Sounder stops and run later into the evening, but that hasn't always been the case (and may not be the case in the future). So if you don't drive to work, you're once again dependent on someone else's schedule.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I'm in favor of just instituting a permanent "daylight savings" shift - or even what the Car Talk guys called "double Dutch daylight savings" (a permanent two hour shift). Here in Washington state, no matter what you do you're going to have a time of year when it's dark going to work/school or coming home from work/school. Heck, right now come December it'll be somewhat dark both ways for me. So I'd just as soon leave the mornings dark, and have at least a tiny amount of daylight available as I'm getting off work.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    26. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at a timezone map, like this one: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/World_Time_Zones_Map.png

      Notice anything about it? like how France and Spain are in the wrong timezone?

      How many British people are actually involved with day-to-day trade with European companies, that would necessitate a CET working day? Surely that number of people is vanishingly small. Many more people work night shifts and early shifts.

      And yet, despite that, you want all of us to be on CET? Why?

      This isn't really about timezones at all, is it? It's all about your hateful bigotry against the people you call "little Englanders", and your mindless intolerance for any English thing that differs from the rest of Europe.

      Really, man, get a grip! Your Anglophobia is really weird. Get a hold of yourself before you find yourself checking for UKIPpers under your bed.

    27. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you hate mornings, more sunlight in the morning is not a substitute.

      Some people in the UK ague the point that morning light helps people wake up better (pitch black mornings VS sunlit mornings) and also helps people who suffer from seasonal affective disorder (SAD)

    28. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What kind of moron thinks that he doesn't have the ability to choose his own career and work when he likes?

      So any grievance you have that isn't horrible enough to prompt you to quit your job is not worthy of complaints? Get a grip.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    29. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      doesnt get dark here till 9 PM under DST, so what the hell does it matter when I leave at 6

    30. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      People need to learn that commute hours are not fixed in stone. Go home an hour later or an hour earlier if the amount of light is important. Although in winter you're stuck if you're not in the tropics; either you go to work in the dark, go back home in the dark, or you cut the number of work hours.

    31. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron demands 350 million other people accommodate their choice of employer?

    32. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call 1688 almost a thousand years ago, though it can be argued whether it was an invasion when all those Dutch ships sailed into London and the King ran away leading to the crowning of a Dutchman and his wife.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    33. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by RussR42 · · Score: 1

      but [his] condemnation of it is far more overboard than their silly request.

      I'm not so sure. The "I don't like how my work hours line up with daylight, so everyone should change their clocks twice a year" crowd seems far more overboard to me.

    34. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. It's near Europe, not in Europe. "Europe" is that continent on the other end of the English Channel. The UK is a member of the European Union though.

    35. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Now that we go back to 'regular time', instead of DST, I have to drive home in the dark, and instead I have light at 6 am in the morning, which I do not want at all.

      If we never had DST around here, In the summer we'd have dawn at 5 am in the morning, or something similarly obnoxious, and sunset would happen way earlier than I want. Compare that to the Spanish solution: Spain despite being more or less aligned with England, instead of using GMT, uses CET, or the same timezone that is used in Poland. So Spaniards get dark morning sometimes (that they don't care about anyway), and instead it's never dark before 5:30 or so, and in the summer, sunset is somewhere near 10 PM, which patches pretty well with a world where people wake up and head to work, which starts at some point between 8 and 9. So in American terns, they are in DST in the winter, and double DST in the summer.

    36. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Most people's ideas of summer hours have little to do with the hours being shifted within the day, but either with hour extensions (like a zoo, which gets a lot less visitors in the winter anyway), or with office workers out early for the weekend (at my old job, good luck finding someone at the office after 2 pm on friday between the 4th of july and labor day)

    37. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All daylight savings does for me is make it so that I drive to work with the rising sun in my eyes and drive home with the setting sun in my eyes. I'd rather it just be dark than put up with that for a good chunk of the year.

    38. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This entire thread was in response to a comment in the summary, which mentioned wanting to keep DST all year 'round because the submitter wanted more light at the end of the day. So taken in the proper context, what I said makes a lot more sense than it does when taken out of context. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    39. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that's what this whole thread was about—adding DST in the winter, too, so that you'll have more light at the end of the day. Most folks who want all-year DST want it so that they'll still have daylight when driving home during the winter.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    40. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This thread was replying to a comment in the summary, which was talking about extending DST to the winter, when it is not still light at 9 P.M.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    41. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most people don't get to choose their work hours. I realize that in high tech, folks insist on flexible work hours, but it isn't the norm in most industries, because most businesses are customer-centric, which tends to result in fairly rigid work hours built around when those customers need them.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    42. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      So because blue-collar employers are too stupid to move their working hours around with the seasons, the government needs to change the clock to suit them?

      I have a better idea: I think the government should legislate that everyone needs to shift their clocks to be 12 hours offset from the current time. Then let's see if these idiotic employers still require everyone to work at night and sleep during the day. Maybe that'll break these employers from keeping the same hours all the time.

    43. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      Americans, frequently.

    44. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Or heck, legislate a shift in work hours. It's hardly more oppressive than legislating capricious changes in the freakin' clock"

      Why do you think there a difference between the two?

    45. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Here in december (as well as part of nov and jan), it's dark both ways if you work 9-5.

      We're on fixed DST, year round. Still dark on the way home.

    46. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by jimbo · · Score: 1

      Sir Humphrey: Minister, Britain has had the same foreign policy objective for at least the last five hundred years: to create a disunited Europe. In that cause we have fought with the Dutch against the Spanish, with the Germans against the French, with the French and Italians against the Germans, and with the French against the Germans and Italians. Divide and rule, you see. Why should we change now, when it's worked so well?

      Hacker: That's all ancient history, surely?

      Sir Humphrey: Yes, and current policy. We 'had' to break the whole thing [the EEC] up, so we had to get inside. We tried to break it up from the outside, but that wouldn't work. Now that we're inside we can make a complete pig's breakfast of the whole thing: set the Germans against the French, the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch. The Foreign Office is terribly pleased; it's just like old times.

      Hacker: But surely we're all committed to the European ideal?

      Sir Humphrey: [chuckles] Really, Minister.

      Hacker: If not, why are we pushing for an increase in the membership?

      Sir Humphrey: Well, for the same reason. It's just like the United Nations, in fact; the more members it has, the more arguments it can stir up, the more futile and impotent it becomes.

      Hacker: What appalling cynicism.

      Sir Humphrey: Yes... We call it diplomacy, Minister.

    47. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Drive home in the dark? Surely not from work, because if that were the case DST does nothing to help the 5-7pm commute since you're already in daylight at that time of year anyway.

      Not true, at many/most latitudes in the US, 6pm is almost pitch dark in the winter.

    48. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Or heck, legislate a shift in work hours. It's hardly more oppressive than legislating capricious changes in the freakin' clock

      Legislating a shift in work hours is absolutely impossible, so it's certainly not more difficult than daylight savings time. And that's partially because daylight savings time is already done.

    49. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      no, no it wasnt, please read the thread

      daylight savings time happens when the days are longest, if the entire reason for it is that poeple dont like driving home in the dark why the hell doesnt it happen during the winter when it gets dark out 4-5 hours earlier than it does in DST?

    50. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you're kidding or not but when talking about continents, the UK is part of Europe. What other continent would it be part of? Africa? Asia? Australia?

      If the UK is on a different continent than Europe, then please update the Wikipedia page, it appears to be wrong: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe

    51. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by grahammm · · Score: 1

      No. Most of (Western) Europe should be on GMT/UTC. The timezone system is based on the sun being at its highest point within 30 minutes of noon local time, with it being at exactly noon at the 15N degree longitude lines. So it is continental Europe that should change to the 'natural' timezone rather than the UK changing to CET.

    52. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by johnw · · Score: 1

      And then everyone who visits Spain comments on how late they eat their evening meals.

      In reality they don't - they have their evening meals at the same time as everyone else, it's just that their clocks are two hours fast.

    53. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of moron believes you can solve a local problem (business hours inconveniently matched to daylight hours) by changing the time reference for the whole nation ?

      Here in UK we often get the argument that we should go to double DST, so that our business day aligns better with europe. So that some 0.005% of office workers can have an 8 hour overlap with Paris, instead of 6 hours. And still be able to enjoy commuting at peak hours.

    54. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I was referring to summer time, when DST is in effect.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    55. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with all this (being in WA myself), and I think the one FUD sticking point is not running schoolchildren over in the dark at any point of any day. So in December it gets very tight to try and have them walking* to school and walking* home in more-or-less daylight. Obviously the entire time system for everyone else in Washington, Oregon, and California needs to be aligned with this.
      (* For children who actually walk to school. In the 'burbs where I grew up, we always always had buses.)

    56. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ancient time before clocks, like for millions of years embedded in our DNA, we (and the entire biosphere) followed the schedule of the sun.
      Then in the last 70 years or so we invented this stupid idea that humans can make the sun follow our schedule.
      We're not coded that way, we are powered by the sun... this stupid idea has never and will never work. Ever.

    57. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "Nobody in their right mind is going to wake up one minute earlier than necessary before work."

      Spoken like a high school kid who works at a burger place.

      Adults with full lives do all sorts of things before the start of work and many jobs don't have set hours. Just because you roll out of bed without a minute to spare doesn't mean everyone does.

    58. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many British people are actually involved with day-to-day trade with European companies, that would necessitate a CET working day?

      Tens of millions of them. Take a look at our trade figures some time. What, you think that's all one guy? Companies tried predominantly with the rest of Europe. Companies employ people.

      like how France and Spain are in the wrong timezone?

      Wow, you're right. It's almost as if those countries realised that being in the same timezone as the majority of their trading partners was some sort of good idea!

      It's all about your hateful bigotry against the people you call "little Englanders"

      Sure. I do so get annoyed by Little Englanders like yourself, and the rest of the Daily Mail reading UKIP voting fuckwits. If they can be bigots, I figure I may as well fight fire with fire and see how you like it; apparently you can dish it out but you can't take it. Poor baby.

      I particularly like the bit where you accuse me of "Anglophobia" because I don't agree with everything spewed forth by UKIP supporters and might actually be pro-European. I guess that gives everyone else reading this a good insight into the mindset of the UKIP voting Little Englander: if you like Europe you must hate Britain. Logic and facts don't come into it.

      For the record, I'm British. Sadly, I'm surrounded by morons.

    59. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Rather than institute year round DST (which makes no sense if you think it through), why not just do everything earlier year round? It is the same thing except you do not pretend that you do it at the same time as we currently do (actually, currently we pretend that we do certain things at the same time all year, and then adjust the clocks so that we actually do things earlier for part of the year).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    60. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing. We're adjusting $something. Right now, we're adjusting clocks. That's easier than say, lots of people adjusting when they wake up, because well, changing peoples behaviors is terrifying difficult. Irony here, is that people really are changing their behavior when they change clocks. Too bad they don't actually realize it.

    61. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by grahammm · · Score: 1

      By the time DST starts, it is already light past the time for getting home for work, and when DST ends it is starting to get dark at go-home time. During the summer it would be light during both morning and evening commute, and in winter it would be dark irrespective of DST. It is only during the few weeks around the clock changes that it affects whether the commutes are in daylight or darkness. Also as others have pointed out, the clock changes are at the time of year when it is getting light/dark during the morning/evening commute which leads to having to two periods each years of suffering the sun just over the horizon during each commute.

    62. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's King Canute's revenge.

      All these modern politicians still have not learned you cannot legislate time and tides.

      CAPTCHA bonus: overtime

    63. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Your job doesn't have any set hours? You're the one who sounds like a part-time burger flipper.

    64. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      balance would require everyone else to move what they did up an hour earlier too, just like DST

    65. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Your city doesn't have ordinances restricting powered equipment usage? You don't know how many times on a weekend/days off/whatever in the summer that I'd been up at 6a, and wanted to cut the grass but had to loiter around 8a... especially true on days when you know that it's going to be damned well hot and humid.

      WA guy: yep same here, but also snow, and it's being forecast to be another bitch of a winter. Not looking forward at all to shovelling 10+' of snow over the season.

      Again as to teh kiddies, I've mentioned elsewhere that they're already walking(the 1 or 2 who do) to school in the dark for weeks now, and even before then some of the dreary days were so dark that even though it was technically "day", it looked and felt more like midnight.

      Double dutch: yeah could live with that all summer, sunset after 10p! Plus it would solve my early rising wanting to cut the grass as I prolly wouldn't still get up at 6a, depressing enough in the winter to be up at 6a and know that there are still hours to sunrise yet...

    66. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People worry about a few extra heart attacks once per year with DST. What about entire neighborhoods being woken up on mornings where some jackass early-riser thinks that the extra morning daylight hours would be a great time to mow their lawn and blow leaves? Who is going to count the heart attacks caused by that?

      Other people want to stay on permanent DST. Who is going to tabulate how many kids get run over going to school in pitch black mornings?

      If your kid is getting run over walking to school in the dark they should not be walking in the middle of the dang road. Just bad parenting right there. Not like these cars are sneaking up on them with their headlights off.

      DST as it's currently implemented works just fine. Keep it as it is.

      Was it working fine before congress added the extra month to it as well?
      My company runs a lot of hardware that still runs on the old rules we (our department has 5 people) have to go manually adjust the time on them 4 times (When clocks change but the device doesn't and again when the device finally changes and needs to be set to the correct time) a year at 150 sites.

    67. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Was it working fine before congress added the extra month to it as well?
      My company runs a lot of hardware that still runs on the old rules we (our department has 5 people) have to go manually adjust the time on them 4 times (When clocks change but the device doesn't and again when the device finally changes and needs to be set to the correct time) a year at 150 sites.

      Congress has been fiddling with DST since it was invented. If you were somehow under the impression that congress would never change DST again while you evaluated equipment for purchase, then you deserve what you get. I'm not going to give up a couple of hundred hours of useful daylight per year to help you compensate for your short-sighted technology buys.

    68. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      *headdesk*

      The whole point of the GGGGP is that the number on the clock doesn't change when the sun goes down. It goes down 24 hours after the time it went down yesterday, +-1%.

      DST only makes sense if you turn it on and off during the year as that 1% error builds up/down, but that's still an awful solution: If you want to drive home in the daylight, just drive home earlier.

    69. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by artao · · Score: 0

      Indeed!!! The length of the day is the length of the day. PERIOD! No clock change alters that. What gets me is that people don't seem to understand that Noon is when the sun passes the meridian, i.e.-the sun is due south (local noon, not by time zones of course) Daylight "Savings" Time alters this such that noon on the clock is actually 11am by the sun ... This throws off our circadian rhythms and attunement to nature.

    70. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by artao · · Score: 0

      Exactly!! This has always bugged me. Why the hell are we "saving" daylight during the time of year when we (in the Northern Hemisphere, at least) have the MOST daylight? That makes zero sense.

    71. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Where I live, I still get to drive home in the dark. Only now I also get to drive *to* work in the dark.

      Yay!

      It's an utterly pointless exercise here. We only do it because of inertia.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    72. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      Agree, where I live in the summer, sun noon occurs at 1:20 pm clock time. which pushes the hottest part of the day to between 4 & 5 pm.

    73. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by omz13 · · Score: 1

      The UK may be geographically on the European continent, but politically and mentally is in its own space.

    74. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country the typical work hours are 8-4, 9-5 is not a universal truth. In fact, if we moved to permanent DST, it's extremely likely that businesses will adapt after a decade or so and work hours slide an hour all year. The only reason DST works is that everyone knows it's not permanent.

    75. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is already true. That is why people now use the term UTC. When the UK joined the EU, it started doing DST. That means the time in Greenwich ceased to be "GMT" time (now UTC) when DST was in effect. I guess you can call it Casablanca Mean Time, but that would get confusing. We should probably stick with UTC, which stands for... well nothing. It was a compromise because Germanic peoples wanted Universal Coordinated Time (UCT) and Romance languages wanted something like Temps Universel Coordonné (TUC).

    76. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      no, no it wasnt [sic] ...

      Yes, it was. The top post in this thread is a response to a quote:

      I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

      which is a direct quote from the summary:

      Personally, I favor year 'round DST — I like the extra sunlight in the evening...

      all the way down to the exact punctuation. And it is the last half of a sentence, the first part of which sets the context for it.

      ... please read the thread

      You first.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    77. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Which only works if you get to choose when you drive home. Work a 9-to-5 job? Sorry, drive home in the dark.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    78. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The reason most people want more light at the end of the day is so they don't have to drive home in the dark.

      That doesn't make much sense. It's now darker when I get off work, since the time was shifted back an hour for winter.

    79. Re: I'm surrounded by morons by jxander · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change the fact that the amount of sunlight present in your evening is dictated by your work, not by the time you wake up.

      --
      This signature is false.
    80. Re:I'm surrounded by morons by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      Um, your solution also only works if you get to choose when you drive home. Work a 10-to-19 job? Sorry, drive home in the dark.

      Most employers choose 9-to-6 or whatever because it's during daylight. Not the other way around!

  5. Helping retailers by jd659 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting interview on the reasons behind the DST was on NPR with the author of "Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time". "The upcoming shift in the daylight-saving time change is designed to help retailers — and is a substitute for a genuine energy policy, says author Michael Downing. Congress moved the time shift up this year. Melissa Block talks with Michael Downing, author of Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time." http://www.npr.org/templates/s... No DST is fine with me.

    --
    There's no such thing as "illegal download"
    1. Re:Helping retailers by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here in Melbourne, DST means my street is clogged with the parked cars of beachgoers in the evening, and yeah it definitely keeps the small shopping strip alive. Like many people in IT I have flexible working hours, neither I, or my boss, or his boss, gives a flying fuck what the clock says. However the vast majority of workers are not so fortunate, for them it's fixed hours or nothing. So if these people want to change the clock so more daylight is available after they knock off why should I care?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  6. "I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I don't.
    All my devices, clock and what not change their time automatically, I don't have to do anything. Other than the first day where I feel like I lost an hour of sleep, I don't even notice it. Stop fussing over something so minor just because you're lazy.

    1. Re:"I don't care" camp. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I don't. All my devices, clock and what not change their time automatically, I don't have to do anything. Other than the first day where I feel like I lost an hour of sleep, I don't even notice it. Stop fussing over something so minor just because you're lazy.

      Most of my clocks are manual changes. My computers obviously auto-change. I have a radio clock that tunes to the atomic clock channel, but its DST change dates are hard-coded for last week (and some other wrong date since congress shifted the dates), so I have to change the timezone last week, this week, and twice in spring.

    2. Re:"I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you don't have any appliances such as a microwave, range, or coffeemaker. Or probably any watches or bedside alarm clocks. I have *one* watch that automatically changes for DST.

      Yeah, my computers, tablets, vehicles, and smartphones change the time automatically, but let's not pretend that's everything.

    3. Re:"I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your argument is that it is monumentally difficult for you to adjust a few clocks twice a year? It takes what 5 minutes total to change all of them? Wow, 10 minutes a year spent changing clocks....I really weep for your hardship.

    4. Re: "I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pointless inconvenience and inefficiency. I would not want you on any dev team I had to work with, with your willful acceptance of busted-ass processes simply because they don't bother you much.

    5. Re:"I don't care" camp. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      My alarm clock is still flashing because the power went out for 3hrs a month ago, the Marvin the Martian wall clock in the kitchen has had a dead battery for several years, the antique clock in the lounge was broken when I found it, the microwave is on the same setting as when I bought it 10yrs ago, the car radio has been wrong since I replaced the car battery five years ago. The TV and my computers automatically adjust themselves, I don't own a mobile phone or a watch. Oddly my life has not fallen to bits due to my disdain of clock watching, a disdain that probably stems from punching clock cards in the 70's and 80's.

      Disclaimer: I have an unusually accurate "inner clock", I can normally guess the time to within +/-15 min, I don't have to think about it, the approximate time in my head is "just there" when I want it. I thought everyone could do this until I was well into my 40's when a new lady friend started calling it a "party trick". The really odd thing is that I actually have to do the mental arithmetic for a few days after a DST change to keep my inner clock in sync with the correct time..

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:"I don't care" camp. by Todd+Palin · · Score: 2

      A numeric designation of time is purely arbitrary in the first place, so adding an arbitrary adjustment twice a year seems consistent with the arbitrary nature of it. The main problem is dealing with more than 24 different times. If we could all agree to make the switch, using a single arbitrary time would make sense in our connected world. I expect that to happen soon after the USA switches to the metric system, which is also somewhat arbitrary, but oh so much more sensible than the totally insane system we use now.

    7. Re: "I don't care" camp. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It's a pointless inconvenience and inefficiency. I would not want you on any dev team I had to work with, with your willful acceptance of busted-ass processes simply because they don't bother you much.

      No, he's weighing the pros against the cons. The cons of the burdens of adjusting clocks are quite minor compared to the other pros and cons being discussed.

    8. Re: "I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pointless inconvenience and inefficiency. I would not want you on any dev team I had to work with, with your willful acceptance of busted-ass processes simply because they don't bother you much.

      And I wouldn't want to be on any dev team of yours if something that you personally don't agree with (like an hour time change twice a year) causes you such hardship in your life.

      It's really, really to move the clock hands forwards or backwards an hour. Poor guy.

    9. Re: "I don't care" camp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your post.

      However I often considered if the whole world just adopted UTC time. At first the idea seems great, everybody in the whole world using the same exact time. No messing with clocks or worrying about timezones when traveling.

      But once you do any thinking on the subject at all you realize many problems. You know that people are generally awake about 9-9PM with decent certainty. But if every country had the same time, maybe in one country someone would wake at 01:00(am) and eat breakfast at 02:00(am) and go to work, then lunch is usually at 5:50(am)... Etc.

      You would have to ask ahead "so what are the business hours like there in Germany?" "so what time is lunch at usually in Argentina?"

      It ends up making more sense initially but less sense overall. There could be some workarounds but definitely things need consideration.

      To be fair I usually think in UTC and just know the offsets for places I have family and friends, but I still need to know and think in terms of the local time when dealing with people.

    10. Re:"I don't care" camp. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Do you just go to appointments 15 minutes early to be sure, or do you let yourself be late half the time?

    11. Re: "I don't care" camp. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      Most people don't wear watches any more. The bedside clock is an anachronism. Who even bothers with the clock on the coffee maker when you can just turn it on on your way to the bathroom (and the digital readout is too small to read anyway)? The microwave - pull out the plug for a minute around noon or midnight if you need the time. The old style Clock on the stove, flip the breaker for an hour in the fall, and before you go to bed in the spring if you must. Wall clocks? Why bother - the only room that doesn't have some timekeeping device in it is the bathroom, and you can't rush nature.

      Time changes suck, not because of the hassles of adjusting clocks, but because the one clock we can't adjust that easily, our internal clock, gets even more messed up. One example, we go to work to code during regular office hours, but for many of us our most creative and productive times are late night. Same with writing.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re: "I don't care" camp. by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      Agree, changing clocks are not the issue

  7. Against it by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time is an awful idea, compounded by the fact that the rules change from location to location and can change from year to year. In computer systems, it gets even worse when you consider that different systems have different rules still, and talking to two of them at the same time can lead to irreconcilable differences which cause all kinds of headaches.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why the fuck are we catering to the 20%?

      They bribe the Congresscum to do their bidding. (or the Parliament, or whatever "bastion of democracy" legislature subjugates whatever place you're talking about)

      Things will be better, come the revolution.

    2. Re:Against it by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It shows a peak followed by a fall. More heart attacks on the Monday than usual, less during the rest of the week. Which is probably being nice to those about to have a heart attack - must better to be in hospital on Monday when the doctors actually care rather than on Friday when they are focused on their golf plans for the weekend.

    3. Re:Against it by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      I wonder if those in the "DST helps to save energy" camp took into account the significant amount of energy used by computers around the world to account for DST in time-zone conversions?

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    4. Re:Against it by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Timezones are NOT needed for anything. Your proposal would make them even worse. Most of the EU shares the same time zone already now and I would be happy seeing them gone for good everywhere. What you propose would bring more of them and cause clock changes even within one country/city, maybe even city block... No, getridoftimezones.org!

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    5. Re:Against it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      For it. Body clocks are synced to light. We can talk all day about headaches of time differences but the fact is it's harder to sleep in in summer and it's a waste of valuable sunlight hours after work when you're not able to start an hour early.

      I actually have no opinion either way because I'm on flextime. But I know people who aren't.

    6. Re:Against it by houghi · · Score: 1

      The faxt that it is not easy in computers is aboput the worst reason to be against it. Computers are there to help us with real world issues. The real world should not help with computer issues.

      I am all for DST. In fact so much that I would want it year around. What I am against is the change twice a year.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Puritans and their offspring.

    8. Re:Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very doubtful that the amount of energy used in computer DST conversions is significant.

    9. Re:Against it by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      I think Iceland has the right idea. GMT all year around.

    10. Re:Against it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, technically you're right. "Standard" time(s, there's more than one obviously) is not "real" time. To achieve that, every town would basically need its own time. So areas are grouped into time zones. With the intent to ensure that there is at most about 30 minutes of deviation to what would "really" be the correct time.

      But the kicker with daylight saving time is that 30 minutes off is ... wait for it ... AT BEST the difference to "real" time. At worst you're 1:30 off.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Against it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... by that logic we could save a lot of lives if we dialed back our clocks by an hour every week.

      Or we could solve overpopulation by pushing it forwards.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Against it by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      Some of us do not like darkness in the morning. Daylight when rising helps us start the day, more important than extra hours of daylight at night.

    13. Re:Against it by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      way to pimp your incomplete website

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  8. Only four months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "only four months"

    How many months does this person think there are in a year?

    Four months is one third of a year. Just like eight hours is one third of your day. Does the amount of time you spend sleeping not matter?

  9. Only a white man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Only a white man would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket and sew it to the bottom of a blanket and have a longer blanket."

    I'm a white man, and I approve of this message. Fuck Daylight Saving Time.

    p.s. Also, Fuck Beta.

    1. Re:Only a white man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember the members of the (R) party were the ones to change it again the last time. Both of them are up for elections.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_in_the_United_States#2005_revision_to_dates_of_observance

      Wyoming Senator Michael Enzi and Michigan Representative Fred Upton advocated the extension from October into November especially to allow children to go trick-or-treating in more daylight.

      Surely they could have had proposed rescheduling Halloween instead...

    2. Re:Only a white man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? Who the fuck goes trick-or-treating in the daylight? When I was a kid we all waited until after sunset. It's Halloween - that's just how you do it. If anything you need the clock set the other way so the kids can get out after dark and still be in bed at a reasonable hour.

    3. Re:Only a white man ... by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      Most towns/cities have a set time for trick-or-treating nowadays. So kids go within the scheduled time. Here it's 5 - 7, with the sun going down at about 6.

    4. Re:Only a white man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last night we had a couple hundred trick-or-treaters.

      Young parents started bringining their toddlers about 6pm ... about 15 minutes after sunset in central Texas.
      About half of our trick-or-treaters were elementary school kids (age 6-12) that came between 7:15 and 7:45.
      Highschool kids came after 8pm, but we still had kids of all ages until 9pm.

    5. Re:Only a white man ... by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      I don't want to be still handing out candy at 9pm, personally. And the 5 - 7 thing makes it easy to figure out how much candy-per-person to give; start out slow at 5, but if you still have a buttload by 6:45, you'd better start giving a lot per person. So I do like having a 2 hour scheduled time. But - even though I have two kids and a teen that go without adults, and one small kid that I go with briefly (he quickly gets cold or tired of walking or etc.) - I wouldn't mind if the whole thing was after dark. I remember waiting until it got dark to start when I was a kid, and don't get me started on how people have gotten ridiculous with "child safety" bs nowadays. And heck n my town, people have gotten so crazy with "halloween lights" (like Christmas lights, but orange or purple or pumpkin shaped @@) that it's not really dark after dark anyway.

      This year it was snowing (first snow of the season) and hailing here on Halloween. So barely anyone trick-or-treated. (And yeah, people were bitching on the town facebook that it should be rescheduled. Ridiculous.) So my kids (who went out anyway, because I make them costumes that are actually appropriate for the weather) got a buttload of candy AND we had a buttload left over since no one came to take ours away.

  10. Simple: Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only the egotistical mind of a politician can fathom the ridiculous idea of starting and stopping the earths spin twice a year

    1. Re:Simple: Dumb by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only the egotistical mind of a politician can fathom the ridiculous idea of starting and stopping the earths spin twice a year.

      Standard Time, Zone Time, is a creation of the railroad.

      Before then, people kept local solar time, with clocks changing about every twenty-five miles or so east and west.

      Twenty-five miles is also about as far as you can travel comfortably in one day on foot, horseback, by stagecoach or the Erie barge canal.

  11. Repeal it! by cruff · · Score: 2

    A real pain in the ass it is, we should abolish it completely.

  12. Should be backwards.. by ottawanker · · Score: 0

    Who care's if it's light out at 7 AM? I want it to be light until at least 6 PM..

    1. Re:Should be backwards.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem: Just pick the right timezone.

    2. Re:Should be backwards.. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Or latitude.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Should be backwards.. by Kuroji · · Score: 2

      And the right latitude.

  13. Make DST standard by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make it DST year round. Daylight in the evening is much better than the mornings. You're going to work in the morning anyhow, who cares how light it is? You get out of work and still have daylight left, awesome.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Make DST standard by Jamu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you want to go to work earlier. Why change the clocks too?

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:Make DST standard by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      I get out of work at 6 AM, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Make DST standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. All the world's a VAX^W^Wemployees work 09:00-17:00.

    4. Re:Make DST standard by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because PHBs freak out about deviating from the holey hours but don't notice if we all change the clocks out from under them.

    5. Re:Make DST standard by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Because the vast majority of workers do not have the luxury of flexible hours, an assembly line needs everyone to synchronize their timekeeping or it simply does not work, in fact the majority of work in the "real world" fundamentally depends on more than one person being in the same place at the same time. So if you can't change the nature of the work, the only option is to change the arbitrary hands off the clock that synchronizes it. Most places have 6 months each way, which seems a fair compromise between driving to and from work in the dark. If you don't want to be part of DST then use UTC, you will never have to change your clock again!!!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Make DST standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work hours were set before DST existed. When DST was introduced, work hours probably shifted over the years to compensate. If we suddenly abolish DST, then work hours will slowly shift back. Just be patient.

    7. Re:Make DST standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST year round. Plus double DST for the summer months. Really awesome!

    8. Re:Make DST standard by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      > in fact the majority of work in the "real world" fundamentally depends on more than one person being in the same place at the same time

      There's nothing stopping employers from changing their work hours with the seasons, and requiring all employees to conform to those hours. They don't need to the government to legislate it for them.

    9. Re:Make DST standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either that or just move every country in the world 1 timezone east.

    10. Re:Make DST standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make it DST year round. Daylight in the evening is much better than the mornings. You're going to work in the morning anyhow, who cares how light it is? You get out of work and still have daylight left, awesome.

      The US tried that in the 1970s for a year. It was found that there was a higher number of accidents with school children during that year.

      During the winter, sun rise can be as late at 8:00--winter time. If DST was instituted that would be 9:00, which would mean elementary school kids would be going to school in the dark. Whereas most classes end by 3 or 4.

      It'd be better to try "normal" time (non-DST) year round IMHO.

    11. Re:Make DST standard by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      How do these emplyers impose their new work hours on other employers (as well as consumers) though?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    12. Re:Make DST standard by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They don't. They don't need to, nor do they have a right to. Everyone needs to just pick whatever hours work best for them. Lots of employers already have more flexible working hours, because they've realized that not everyone absolutely needs to have the exact same hours; that's why so many companies have '"core hours". And with so much business being international, you're never going to get everyone on the same schedule anyway. Companies in California are not going to have the same hours as companies in New York, and neither of them will have the same hours as companies in China. So what exactly is the point? Obviously, employees need to come in to work when their employer requires, but there's nothing new about that. The idea that some factory needs to have the same hours as other businesses is just silly; they're likely getting shipments from far-flung timezones anyway, not from other companies one or two towns over like back in the 1800s. And retail business have to pick different hours anyway, in order to maximize their customer traffic, which is why so many retail stores stay open late and have weekend hours. You can't close your doors at 5PM and somehow expect consumers, who all work 9-5 jobs (or thereabouts), to somehow get to your store during those hours. A lot of stupid mom-and-pop shops never seem to understand that concept, but the big-box stores all do.

    13. Re:Make DST standard by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      So then you freely admit that your proposal will not fulfil the same goals as the current approach? Perhaps that's why employers need the government to legislate it for them. You're looking at retail when most money changes hands between businesses, and that works better when businesses keep the same hours.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    14. Re:Make DST standard by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I don't admit anything of the sort. I just explained to you above why your assumption is fallacious: businesses DO NOT keep the same hours, and legislation will never change that. Businesses in China are not going to keep the same hours as businesses in the US, and a huge amount of trade between businesses these days is either interstate or international. Businesses seem to work just fine buying and selling stuff over long distances across time zones, so why do you insist that businesses need to keep the same hours?

    15. Re:Make DST standard by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Your claim that "a huge amount of trade between businesses these days is either interstate or international" seems to imply that domestic business to business sales are insignificant; is this "huge amount" indeed a majority, or is it really more like "a small amount"?

      Your claim that "Businesses seem to work just fine buying and selling stuff over long distances across time zones" seems misleading. Maintaining 24-hour staff incurs greater costs than simply maintaining a single shift operating within standard business hours. Transactions between businesses without overlapping shifts take longer than those between those with overlapping shifts. Why do you insist that the costs of synchronized business hours outweigh the benefits?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    16. Re:Make DST standard by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Your claim that "a huge amount of trade between businesses these days is either interstate or international" seems to imply that domestic business to business sales are insignificant

      No, it doesn't imply that at all, it implies the opposite. B2B sales are a large part of the economy. They're just not always in the same timezone. Somehow that doesn't seem to be a problem, but for some reason you claim it is. Are you saying you don't think businesses on the east coast do business with companies on the west coast? That claim is utterly stupid.

      Your claim that "Businesses seem to work just fine buying and selling stuff over long distances across time zones" seems misleading. Maintaining 24-hour staff incurs greater costs than simply maintaining a single shift operating within standard business hours.

      Companies within the US seem, unlike you, to be smart enough to realize that there's overlapping working hours between the timezones, and that they can do all the communication they need during those overlapping hours. In addition, companies (unlike you again) understand there's this thing called "email" which allows communications at all hours, without both(/all) parties needing to be participating at the same time.

      Transactions between businesses without overlapping shifts take longer than those between those with overlapping shifts

      So, you're saying that there's very little trade between the US and China? Maybe you need to seek psychological help since you seem to have a poor grasp of reality. Are you seriously suggesting that we need to have the government force us all to keep Chinese hours?

    17. Re:Make DST standard by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      o, it doesn't imply that at all, it implies the opposite. B2B sales are a large part of the economy. They're just not always in the same timezone.

      Domestic. I said domestic. That implies that they are in the same timezone (or have a sufficiently small delta-t to still have a majority of their "work day" overlap).

      Somehow that doesn't seem to be a problem, but for some reason you claim it is. Are you saying you don't think businesses on the east coast do business with companies on the west coast? That claim is utterly stupid.

      A three hour offset still leaves five hours of overlap. Of course, this only leaves 2/3 as much time to do business compared against businesses in the same time zone with the same work hours. Why is that claim utterly stupid?

      Companies within the US seem, unlike you, to be smart enough to realize that there's overlapping working hours between the timezones, and that they can do all the communication they need during those overlapping hours.

      See above.

      In addition, companies (unlike you again) understand there's this thing called "email" which allows communications at all hours, without both(/all) parties needing to be participating at the same time.

      I addressed this in my previous post by mentioning the delays inherent in such transactions.

      So, you're saying that there's very little trade between the US and China?

      I'm not sure where you got that. Does increased communication latency necessarily prevent large amounts of trade?

      Maybe you need to seek psychological help since you seem to have a poor grasp of reality.

      Thank you for your referral.

      Are you seriously suggesting that we need to have the government force us all to keep Chinese hours?

      No, I'm suggesting that we need to have the government force us all to buy Buicks. Man, pay attention.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    18. Re:Make DST standard by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      or have a sufficiently small delta-t to still have a majority of their "work day" overlap).

      So here you think it's OK for businesses to not keep the exact same hours, but elsewhere you think the government should force businesses to keep the same hours. Which is it?

      A three hour offset still leaves five hours of overlap. Of course, this only leaves 2/3 as much time to do business compared against businesses in the same time zone with the same work hours. Why is that claim utterly stupid?

      Because you're arguing that the government needs to force everyone to keep the same business hours, when we already have a situation where they don't because the continental USA spans 4 times zones. So which is it? Is it OK for businesses to not keep the same hours, or not?

      I'm not sure where you got that. Does increased communication latency necessarily prevent large amounts of trade?

      The basis of your whole argument is that the government needs to force everyone to keep the same business hours for increased efficiency, but apparently US companies have no trouble trading with China which has very different business hours.

    19. Re:Make DST standard by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      So here you think it's OK for businesses to not keep the exact same hours, but elsewhere you think the government should force businesses to keep the same hours. Which is it?

      The optimal situation, regarding maximizing the time available to interact with other businesses while minimizing hours of operation, occurs when everyone shares the same business hours. When businesses do not share the same business hours, the outcome is suboptimal. I'm not sure what you mean by "OK" in this context. Is suboptimal "OK" or not? Also, I never suggested that the government "should force businesses to keep the same hours". I did suggest that government edicts can support the coordination of schedules better than the ad-hoc process you suggest, thereby improving outcomes.

      Because you're arguing that the government needs to force everyone to keep the same business hours, when we already have a situation where they don't because the continental USA spans 4 times zones. So which is it? Is it OK for businesses to not keep the same hours, or not?

      I'm not arguing about any "needs" at all. Nor am I arguing about forcing everyone to keep the same business hours. Furthermore, it's unclear what your criteria are for something to be "OK".

      The basis of your whole argument is that the government needs to force everyone to keep the same business hours for increased efficiency, but apparently US companies have no trouble trading with China which has very different business hours.

      Once again, I'll clarify for your benefit: my argument had nothing to do with "needing" to "force" anyone to do anything. In my previous post, I've specifically addressed the trouble that US companies have regarding trade with China in the context of keeping very different business hours. Additionally, I'd like to point out that you've quoted the question that I posed to you, but you haven't answered it.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  14. Proposal to eliminate yearly time change by gbcox · · Score: 1

    There is actually a website with a proposal getting rid of the time change which seems fairly well thought out and logical: http://www.standardtime.com/pr...

  15. Against DST by MPBoulton · · Score: 1

    Because I hate losing that hour!

    1. Re:Against DST by Pinkfud · · Score: 1

      I live in Arizona where we don't fuck with it, but it makes me rethink local times vs times in other states when I need to call someone. It was a stupid idea that never made sense from the beginning. Let's drop it.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    2. Re:Against DST by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I live in Arizona

      Yes people's attitude to dst very much depends on where you live, people in Queensland where the sun is also high in the sky all year round also don't see any sense in it because in Qld an Az it's daylight at both ends of the work day anyway. Here in Melbourne where dawn/twilight stretches out much longer and the length of daylight changes more dramatically with the seasons it makes sense and people overwhelmingly support it. Go a similar distance south again and the winter day becomes shorter than workday so again it won't makes sense to someone who lives in (say) Northern Scotland.

      The answer we have in Oz is that the two states (with the same UTC offset) have different time zones in summer, both of them are happy, a queenslander will not demand we drop it anymore than we demand they copy us. The only people who become confused are people who are confused about far more than just the time of day.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  16. Atlantic Standard Time by pikine · · Score: 1

    For a saner alternative to Eastern Daylight Time, I use Atlantic Standard Time. AST is the same as EDT year around, and many countries (e.g. Dominican Republic) don't observe Atlantic Daylight Time.

    http://www.timeanddate.com/tim...

    Although I use AST at home, my schedule is still heavily influenced by everyone else outside. Go figure.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:Atlantic Standard Time by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I left the US, renounced my citizenship, and settled in the Eastern Caribbean just so I could live under the sanity of AST and be rid of DST forever.....well that and the whole police state/fascist thing.

      Good riddance, we won't miss you. We don't need losers like you who don't really love this... oh shit, I think a SWAT team just busted into my house, gotta go

  17. It's stupid - switch to GMT by hydrodog · · Score: 1

    In a global world, everyone gets confused what time it is somewhere else. So we should simply all use GMT. If we want winter hours to be different, we change starting hours. That way, my school opens at 13:00 GMT, and in the winter at 12:00GMT, and that's it -- anyone the world over can call and not get confused. Of course, now we have email, so who cares anyway? We all work from home.

    1. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Your solution doesn't go far enough! We should all switch to UNIX epoch time and refer to time in seconds from Midnight, Jan 1, 1970, GMT. I know POSIX specifies UTC, but they don't track leap seconds so they're just confusing everyone and can therefore fuck right off. Then at last there will be no relationship to the celestial spheres that drove the creation of Time to begin with! If you really need your antique ("Wahh how do I know when lunch time is?") you can just modulo the time by 86400 to get the number of seconds since midnight, divide your longitude by 15, multiply that by 3600 and add the result to the number of seconds since midnight and if you're somewhere close to 43200, you're getting close to lunch time. Or ask Apple to put that number under the main time display on your smart watch. Der!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      Move to Iceland. Fun fact: it's the only country in the world that uses GMT. All. Year. Long.

      OK, I guess parts of Western Africa too.
      http://www.timeanddate.com/tim...

    3. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it would actually make the situation worse. Consider that when you call someone you may ask, "what time is it there"? What you (usually) really want to know is what part of the day / night is it. Making everyone live under GMT would answer the first question but not give you any useful information to what you really want to know and just make it harder to find out.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    4. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by Nos. · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what the world should do.
      When I schedule a meeting, I just pick the time and date and everyone knows instantly when that is, it doesn't matter what time of year it is, and when [Country X] has arbitrarily decided to change times this year.

      I moved from Saskatchewan (who doesn't change times) to BC and I'm not looking forward to it. Sure I'll get an extra hours of sleep this weekend, but I lose it a few months later.

      The sad thing is, the number of people in SK who want to change times, or worse yet, think that province should switch to MST. For those who don't know, Saskatchewan falls completely within CST. It generally becomes an argument about this time every year.

    5. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by Lirodon · · Score: 1

      I did the exact opposite; we moved from Ontario to Saskatchewan a few years back (after me, not knowing of this quirk on a road trip that had a stop in the province about a decade ago, accidentally set a hotel clock back to CDT from CST and goofed up our itinerary a bit). The only awkwardness it causes is when we have to adjust our television viewing habits to work around the time differences that develop, but we use that to our advantage.

    6. Re:It's stupid - switch to GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everyone lists their business hours in Zulu time, there's never any confusion as to whethr theyyre open yet or not. The biggest problems with DST arent from DST itself, but from the different point of the year in which various places make the switch leading to the total difference in time in different places having 0, 1, or 2 hours of DST correction applied. GMT avoids all that.

  18. My mom sets her watch and clocks 15 minutes ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's so she "won't be late." Daylight savings time is every bit as useful.

    If companies want to have summer and winter hours to adjust to light and darkness, fine, but to give an entire country a little jet lag for a bogus "saving" of daylight is ridiculous.

  19. Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the overall economy ?

    I am personally aware of it forcing the update replacing of no longer supported operating systems in solutions that were date time dependent. (Everything pre XP/ various versions of unix and I would guess lots of old mainframe code). But that isn't from daylight savings time but rather the legislature playing games with when it went into effect.

    As far as I can see now it just screws with people's sleep cycles and schedules to no particular effect.

    P.S. I have heard the safer for the children argument concerning going and coming to school. It seems it would be simpler to change the schools hours of operation.

  20. I want a randomly changing UTC offset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A random offset would provide a perfect excuse for missing meetings.

  21. Against it by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Statistics show that the heart attack rate shows a small but significant peak following the weekend DST is activated. You're fucking with the biorhythm of people in ways that are only rivaled by forcing them to travel from east to west coast twice a year and having to adjust the time accordingly. And for what? "More sunlight hours" in the Summer (because, yes, the NORMAL time is the time you have in WINTER!)? So more time that I have to deal with screen glare, yeah, that's what I want!

    4 out of 5 people are "night" people, i.e. people who have less trouble adapting to staying up later than they have to getting up early. And why the fuck are we catering to the 20%?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Here we go again... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Here we go again... by YoungHack · · Score: 1

      Yes. This.

    2. Re:Here we go again... by Slagothor · · Score: 1

      This makes absolute sense. It also has the added incentive of resolving the H1-B visa situation: 1. All of the Americans living along the line where the timezones change can watch Jeopardy an hour earlier. 2. They head to a location in the later timezone playing Jeopardy on TV. 3. Instant geniuses! 4. Profit!

  23. Do we use candles anymore? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    No? Because that is why we started daylight savings time. To save candles. Because people would come in early in the day or stay later at night and you'd have to light a candle which could be expensive if everyone was doing it.

    But... we don't use candles anymore. We use LED lightbulbs and nuclear fucking power.

    So... DST is obsolete. Retire it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use LED lightbulbs and nuclear fucking power.

      Where do you live? Most of the world does not use nuclear power. US and China, for instance, prefer to burn coal. Not because it's cheaper, but just to fuck with the environment.

    2. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I don't know where Karmashock lives, but I live in northern Illinois, USA, where we get over half of our electricity fom nukes.

    3. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I was trying to emphasize the technological gulf between the circumstances that justified the policy and today.

      Lets say I light my home/business with nothing but evil incandescent light bulbs and... I burn the souls of lost orphans in my furnace of ultimate evil to power them. Daylight savings time still doesn't make sense.

      DST was put in place for ECONOMIC reasons because candles were expensive. Seriously try to light your home for a week with candles. What you'll end up doing, is walking around with a personal candle that just lights the area immediately around yourself. And even then you'll go through a couple candles a day.

      Whatever we use for power and lighting today, it is so cheap that DST has no purpose.

      I mean, light bulbs are cheap. I think I bought a 12 pack of light bulbs not long ago for 8 dollars? Something like that. And as to the price of orphan souls... Check the market... cheap cheap cheap.

      Seriously though... get the fucking point and don't come up with fucktarded counter arguments... it annoys me.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by radarskiy · · Score: 0

      You have eliminated the equation of time? You should tell everyone how. It would be quite impressive.

    5. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The equation of time? what are you babbling about?

      We had watches and clocks long before we had DST to say nothing of the actual concept of time which we've had since... always.

      The point is that DST was instituted to save CANDLES. It had nothing to do with the equation of time or whatever you've confused yourself into thinking that means.

      The problem was that during some months of the year it was dark at the start of the day. This required people to burn candles before the sun came up in many cases. And then in other months it was dark before the work day ended requiring people again to light candles so they could finish their jobs.

      The point of DST was to shift the work day an hour one way then the other so that more of the work day happened during natural day light which meant burning fewer candles.

      Candles is the reason we have DST. That is what it is all about.

      Candles. Not the equation of time or... whatever that is supposed to mean... CANDLES.

      Do you know what we use candles for these days? Birthday cakes and formal dinners. That is pretty much it. Even in a power outage you use a flashlight.

      DST is an anachronism. It is the male nipple policies. And what is more it is only relevant to specific latitudes.

      If you're on the equator then there is no seasonal variation in the length of the day. What is more if you are at a much higher latitude then the differences can literally be measured in MONTHS not a god damn hour.

      If you really wanted to do a proper daylight saving time system, you'd have to do it something like the time zone system only laterally. With the equator being the baseline and zones every so many degrees having their own seasonal offsets.

      This would make the question of what time it is quite a bit more complicated because you'd have to know roughly your longitude and latitude as well as the day of the year in addition to the actual hour. BUT... assuming you want to keep track of all that in real time... go for it. We have smartphones and smart watches and internet of things devices and so forth... they can do the math for us if you really want to do that.

      I'm personally happy with zulu time. I don't especially care for time zones or daylight savings time. They confuse matters as often as not unless you stay within your zone and don't interact with anything outside of it.

      I do. I interact with the world on a regular basis and thus saying "oh lets do that at 3 pm" has a completely different meaning to someone else. Which is why I prefer zulu time. I tell them when something is happening Zulu... and they tell me when things are happening Zulu. No confusion. No worrying about people's different changing reference points because we're all using the same global reference point.

      This isn't especially unusual. You see people in the finance industry do this and you see people that manage any kind of international shipping or travel do this as well. Pilots all work in Zulu for example. Take off and landing times are all in Zulu in the traffic controller's room.

      But that's just me. If you want to have your regional time zones... fine. Its no skin off my back. I do however wish that stupid daylight savings time would either get reformed to be more rational or simply retired. It is beyond idiotic that people in Hawaii for example are shifting their clocks around. The sun doesn't appreciably rise or set any sooner at that latitude. Its pointless.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Do we use candles anymore? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "The equation of time? what are you babbling about?"

      The time between successive local noon varies throughout the year. (In addition, local sunrise and sunset hit their extremes out of phase, i.e. the latest sunrise is not the same day as the earliest sunset.) The daylight portion of a full day shifts back and forth. This excursion is the equation of time. It is the correction you need to add to a sundial reading to get clock time, or vice versa.

      The spread of this excursion is depend on on axial tilt, not on latitude of observation. However, the spread for the Earth is only 30m39s, not a full hour.

      "I tell them when something is happening Zulu... and they tell me when things are happening Zulu"

      Exactly, you still need to know when business hours are with respect to Zulu time... which is exactly the same information as time zone UTC offsets. There is no new information, but now people have to convert for their local time as well as the remote time.

      And if you take different offsets in different seasons then this is the same things as DST. There is no new information yet once again you have added an additional conversion for local time and prevented people fomr just looking at their clocks to find out what time it is right here right now.

  24. against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having to switch my biological clock is much more important to me, than the sun being out, or not.

  25. against it - China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disclaimer: I live in the UK

    I run all our servers at every company on UTC (not GMT but similar), I'm up for just altering our mind sets about time, when we break them social attitudes will change.

    When I've got a meeting at 4PM, especially around this time of year between the EU DST switch and the US one, that's a nightmare. And then when you're trying to compare logs between countries with retarded timezone differences throughout the year between changes!! ARGH!

    I'd be happy to get up at 8PM and work through the daylight and go to bed at 12PM, I'd quite happily have have UTC move 5, 12 15, whatever hours out just so we could all live on the same time world wide and just adjust our work and living hours around that... "business hours between 12AM and 9AM" sounds fine to me.

  26. Against it by amaurea · · Score: 1

    Currently we use normal time (as in time where 00:00 is approximately the middle of the night) in the winter, and move if away from that correspondence in the summer. If anything, the opposite would make sense. In summer daylight is plentiful anyway, it's winter where daylight is limited and one could make an argument for tampering with our timekeeping to make the most out of that limited light. The current system is backwards. But I'm not in favor of winter-daylight-saving-time either. What I've read on the subject indicates that the switchover comes with significant costs in the form of extra accidents and worse health in the days just after the switch. These are admittedly small effects, but then, so is the argued benefit.

    Worse than either of these systems is the proposal of permanent daylight savings time. Here one breaks the logical basis for our time system (the position of the sun) for the forseeable future just to save oneself from a one-time transition period of updating people's schedules, which would have the same effect without messing with our clocks. It is a bit of a dirty hack rather than a proper fix, and only makes sense from a short-term perspective. If one is going down this route, why limit yourself to one hour? Wouldn't it be nice if the sun were still up when you get home from work in the middle of winter at northerly latitudes, and lasted long enough to enjoy the sun with your family? At, say, 60 degrees north, the sun sets around 15:00 in winter. So just add 5 hours to the time, making it set at a comfortable 20:00. And then, in the year 2150 when a child asks why midnight occurs at 05:00 and noon at 17:00, they'll be happy to hear that it was because people 6 generations ago couldn't be bothered to change their actual schedules.

    On the other hand, our time system isn't exactly a work of beauty to begin with. Perhaps one more wart won't matter. Especially when we already have a nearly equivalent one in the form of the current temporary daylight savings time.

  27. Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Funny

    We spent thousands of man years on making this shit work, so if anybody proposes getting rid of DST I will send teams of rabid ninga weasels to gnaw their putrid dicks off.

    We had to suffer, why should others not know the pain.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
    1. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by rwa2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Eh, I just set everything to UTC and don't worry about weird things, like cron jobs between midnight and 1am running twice or not at all every once in a while.

      Of course, my last major employer has everything set to PST/PDT, since that's where their major data center is, even though they have rather large branches in every major timezones. And because of some stupid thing in Oracle 10/11 of all things, all of the new data centers in other time zones /also/ are running in PST/PDT, because it's the only way to get Oracle's XDCR to work.

      Which means their new international data center in China will not only be on PST/PDT, but will enjoy 4 DST transitions per year, since China switches their clocks a few weeks off from North America.

    2. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Noah+Haders · · Score: 5, Funny

      a pet peeve of mine is that when people quote a time like "1pm pacific time" but want to feel fancy they say "1pm PDT". about half the time they are wrong and should have said 1pm PST! When they're wrong I'm always tempted to show up an hour early or late and feign innocence, saying that I was just doing what they said.

    3. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a resident of Arizona, I share that pet peeve.

    4. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a resident of Indiana, you're right.

    5. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do finally catch on and start saying PST... right around the time when we adopt daylight savings time. And so it goes.

    6. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We spent thousands of man years on making this shit work...

      It doesn't work. It has never worked. It will never work. It is nothing less than one metric ton of pure unadulteraded idiocy, always has been and always will be.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Of course, my last major employer has everything set to PST/PDT, since that's where their major data center is, even though they have rather large branches in every major timezones

      PayPal?

    8. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      China does not observe daylight savings time. Its stupid because it gets light at 430 in the morning in the summer, and the Sun is down by 730.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by corychristison · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in Saskatchewan, we do not observe Daylight Saving Time. The entire province is really smack dab center between two timezones. A number of years ago our provincial government decided to do away with DST. We are now, effectively, permanently in Central Standard Time.

      As a business owner, who deals with clients across North America, I have a lot of people try to correct me when I say our timezone is CST, and they believe it should be CDT. Some people simply cannot comprehend that we don't observe DST.

      As an aside, the only argument we have about the time around here is whether we are stuck on CST or MDT.

    10. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by houghi · · Score: 1

      It might be a metric ton of pure unadulteraded idiocy, but it feels like imperial tons to me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also agree with the Sunk Cost Fallacy. If we stop doing DST *now*, it will make all the resources we put into it historically a waste! In the early days, when it helped farmers (or something), that's fine because we won't rewrite history; those farmers (or whoevs) will still have been helped. But in the intervening years (decades?) when it's unclear if there was any benefit, admitting defeat means admitting there wasn't, and we shouldn't have, and it's been a waste. The only way to avoid mistakes is to press on and prove the current path is correct. Forever, I guess.

    12. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone of Native American descent once told me, "only white men could think you can make a blanket longer by cutting a foot off one end and sewing it to the other."

      Sounds like a perfect description of DST to me.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    13. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really hate meeting invitations sent by a well known tool:

      > When: Friday, May 16, 2014 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
      > Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

      I cannot figure out how to interpret the note: Should I just ignore DST and go to the meeting at 9AM according to the current PDT/PST or should I adjust the DST myself?

      The logic tells me to use 9:00 AM UTC-08:00 which is well defined and absolutely independant of DST. Unfortunately, the given UTC is wrong. To make things worse, I am in Europe so I have to convert them to my local time (with different dates of DST changes). Haaaaaaa!!!!!!!

    14. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when you put politicians in charge of politics instead of engineers.
      Do NOT vote political parties, vote BRAINS.

    15. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by tomhath · · Score: 2

      This makes a whole lot of sense when you think about it. What difference does it really make if your clock reads 11:00 AM versus 7:00 AM when you get up in the morning?

    16. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      the only argument we have about the time around here is whether we are stuck on CST or MDT.

      Obviously you're on CST in the winter and MDT in the summer.

      (I'm only half joking - taking that approach will help solve your "didn't you mean CDT?" problem.)

    17. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Huh, you're right... looks like China is run by engineers and scientists, and they went ahead and did away with DST in China after the turn of the millennium.

      Well my current company is doing work in the UK, and I just found out a few days ago that some of servers there are set to EST/EDT. So this week we'll have to adjust the daily reboot cron jobs by an hour, and next week we'll get to dork with it again when BST switches over to GMT.

      At least China still has a lot of corruption to make up for it... well at least according to Western media :-/

    18. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by fonos · · Score: 1

      Mainland China (People's Republic of China) has one time zone and does not have daylight savings times. They don't switch their clocks, ever.

    19. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      I do just that, if I hear open on EST, say on a recording, then I call back on EST, and of course no,one,is there, and,I leave a nasty message.

    20. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... China does not switch clocks. The whole country is on BeijingTime all year round. That means of course that people in the west of the country are living about 4 hours ahead of their natural time.
      Gotta love those long evenings, even dead of winter.

    21. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like a problem with how the time zones are aligned. In Canada, which is at least as far north, it gets light in most time zones at around 5 or 5:30 a.m. when on DST, and the sun sets close to 10:30 or 11 p.m. And that is only a 100 miles north of the American border in the western provinces. Your time zones are screwy.

    22. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cant we just pick a time? who cares. What a pain to readjust all the time, Rediculous!!!

    23. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by brunnegd · · Score: 1

      DST does not help farmers

    24. Re: Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a resident of Indiana, I hate it when fellow Hoosiers state times in PDT.

    25. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by internerdj · · Score: 1

      We will see what you have to say about it when Ben Franklin brings out his cannons...

    26. Re:Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      We will see what you have to say about it when Ben Franklin brings out his cannons...

      Ben Franklin... isn't he that guy who flew his kite in a lightning storm and survived?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  28. Ben Franklin's joke by SternisheFan · · Score: 4, Informative
    " Back in 1784, hanging out in Paris and heady with Enlightenment, Benjamin Franklin had an idea. Struck by the fact that Parisians were sleeping during sunlight hours and then staying up late at night by candlelight, he calculated the number of candles that were being wasted -- and came up with a very impressive number, 64 million pounds worth of them. Franklin therefore jokingly proposed a massive schedule change, noting that a fortune could be saved through "the economy of using sunshine instead of candles," and even suggested at one point that perhaps cannons be fired at sunrise to get everybody out of bed."

    .... "The researchers also had the cooperation of Duke Energy, which provided a massive data set of monthly utility bills for nearly 230,000 Indiana residents, organized by their locations. And they had weather data, meaning that they could chart energy use against temperature fluctuations (which are obviously a very central factor in heating and cooling). And the results, at least for followers of Franklin, were shocking: Daylight saving time increased energy use in the counties that had just switched to it, by about 1 percent during the period when it was in effect. The overall cost translated into $ 3.29 per person per year -- nearly $ 9 million overall across Indiana. And on top of that, the added pollution resulted in an additional $ 1.7 to $ 5.5 million per year in “social” costs. Ouch."

    Source : www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/31/daylight-saving-time-may-increase-your-energy-bill/

    1. Re:Ben Franklin's joke by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully Franklin's takeway from this is that one should never make suggestions ironically because some incompetent twit will think it's a good idea and implement it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Ben Franklin's joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Clocks will be “falling back” an hour this Sunday, marking the end of daylight saving time (DST) and the beginning of an old debate as to whether the practice should be continued. www.nj.com/indulge/index.ssf/2014/11/six_reasons_its_time_to_stop_daylight_savings_time.html

      Although some people relish the opportunity to gain an extra hour of sleep every fall, many Americans don’t see the necessity in adjusting their clocks — and their schedules — twice a year. With so much opposition to DST, here are a few reasons why it might be time to stop changing the clocks.

      1. An unpopular tradition

      The main argument against daylight saving time is simple: People don’t like to do it. According to a Rasmussen report from March of 2013, only 37 percent of Americans believe that DST should continue, while 45 percent said that the practice was pointless and was not “worth the hassle.”

      2. Farmers

      Much of the argument for maintaining DST lies in the belief that the practice is beneficial to farmers. However, the changing hours have little to no effect on the daily tasks required on a farm, according to Hillary Barile, partner at Rabbit Hill Farms, of Shiloh.

      “There's still the same number of daylight hours, but I would say this time of year makes it even harder,” said Barile. “We don't have as many evening daylight hours left and you're still constrained by the clock, but now it just gets darker earlier.”

      She added, “You don't always know until you get started in the morning what you need to do, so having morning daylight doesn't always make a difference.”

      3. Safety concerns

      Changing the clocks means waking up and going to bed at different hours, but it can also create a higher risk of traffic accidents for commuters who normally drive home during daylight hours.

      A study published by the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that drivers unaccustomed to the time differences due to DST are more likely to get into accidents due to disrupted circadian rhythms and insufficient sleep.

      "As a society we are chronically sleep-deprived and that small additional losses of sleep may have consequences for public and individual safety," said Dr. Stanley Coren in his report.

      4. Health hazards

      Changing an individual's schedule by a single hour might not just interrupt their day, but could also be hazardous to their health. Recent studies have linked the beginning and end of DST to a variety of health problems, including an increased risk of heart attacks and a rise in suicide rates.

      According to Dr. Sean Duffy, an associate professor of Psychology at Rutgers-Camden, DST is not only a risk to physical health, but it could negatively affect a person's mood. “Falling back” in the winter marks the beginning of early nights, sometimes leading to symptoms of depression.

      “The change in DST in fall is also a marker of the end of the summer season and the beginning of winter,” said Duffy. “This can be depressing for those longing for the extravagances of summer.”

      5. Interrupted sleeping schedules

      Setting clocks back an hour means gaining an extra hour of sleep time. For others who might be more sensitive to time changes, however, going to bed an hour later could cause anything but sweet dreams.

      According to Dr. Sean Duffy, an associate professor of Psychology at Rutgers-Camden, time changes could upset a person’s natural sleeping schedule. In some cases, the process of adjusting to “springing forward” and “falling back” can affect learning and memory processes by changing the way that the brain functions.

      “Sleep is a critical process for the whole body, helping it repair damage, but particularly for the brain, which consolidates memory and helps us learn,” said Duffy. “Most people can handle the one hour switch of daylight saving time but if you are prone to sleep disorders or insomnia, the change in timing can take some adjustment.”

    3. Re:Ben Franklin's joke by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, I doubt that happened, since he did not live to see DST implemented. Indeed by the time it was implemented, most people no longer used candles as their light source, since by that time electric lighting was widely available.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  29. Get rid of it. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Switching the time backwards and forwards sucks. Just get rid of it.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Get rid of it. by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Having to get out of bed and go to work sucks. Switching the time back and forth is just a reminder that this is necessary.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  30. For it! by Thomasje · · Score: 1
    Honestly, every year, twice a year, the DST haters come out of the woodwork, because apparently adjusting your clocks twice a year is soooooo difficult. A couple of people seem to realize that having extra sunlight in the evening in summer is nice, but then *they* overshoot and suggest we should have DST year-round, apparently not realizing how much it sucks to be a working stiff and have to get up and go to work while it's still dark on winter mornings.

    Take a breath, people. DST exists for a perfectly good and simple reason: to use daylight a bit more effectively than we would if we used a schedule that never changed with the seasons. Sure, if you live in or near the tropics, that's a non-issue, but for those of us in the rest of the world, DST is a good thing. And if you're one of those people who uses their smartphone as their alarm clock and pocket watch, you never have to worry about the adjustment; smartphones and computers make the adjustment automagically, *and* they even alert you that this happens. (Even back in the day, adjusting my clocks never took me more than five minutes; totally worth it for the improved quality of life that comes with more sunlight when it does the most good.)

    1. Re:For it! by Jamu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe it's the one-hour shift to their sleeping-pattern, twice each year, they object to?

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:For it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the change! (Change is good).

      Change for the sake of change is good? Wow, then why not change our clocks *every* night? That would be even better!

      Best of all would be if we changed our clocks a random amount daily, and that amount could be announced every day at 2 minutes to midnight! How exciting and good that would be!

    3. Re:For it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's the one-hour shift to their sleeping-pattern, twice each year, they object to?

      That's an even more retarded argument. If that is their problem, then they should just go to sleep one hour earlier on the night the clocks move forward and go to sleep an hour later on the night clocks roll back. There, problem solved and everyone can stop whining about this non-issue.

    4. Re:For it! by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      To be fair, its only the less sleep shift that people seem to mind.

    5. Re:For it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the rest of the country bases their day on what the clocks are doing. Unless you can juggle an hour of your schedule around, you can't really do that.

    6. Re:For it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who objects to gaining an hour of sleep?

      Just reverse the "spring ahead." Fall and spring we should set the clocks one hour back.

  31. Kill the Time Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I absolutely hate changing my clocks, it's a pain in my @$$. I say once we change it tonight, we never do it again. Oh, before someone says buy a new clock, just know that I have VCR's that the stupid changing of the date for the DST made that impossible on and no I wont give up my VCR's. And yes, I do have a DVR as well.

  32. If I had to decide by T0min · · Score: 1

    There is no point in DST in Finland. Maybe in middle Europe it is a bit bigger deal but here in north it's useless. Our summer is so bright that the change of timezone doesn't make a difference really. It might be nice for a week or too, but the days get longer so quickly that it really doesn't change much. If I decided we wouldn't have a DST here, it's just an annoyance when we must change clocks twice a year. I'd love to have UTC+2 all year round.

  33. Against DST or against winter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny that all those complaints against DST only happen when it's turned off in autumn and (almost) never when it's turned on in spring. It seems people don't care about DST so much but really want to abolish winter. Good luck with that.

    1. Re:Against DST or against winter? by Jamu · · Score: 1

      I would, but it involves having two different homes and switching between them twice a year.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:Against DST or against winter? by jbengt · · Score: 2

      It's funny that all those complaints against DST only happen when it's turned off in autumn . . .

      It might be funny, but it's not true

  34. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by ThorGod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Messing with sleep is reason enough. If you get people out of step they're more likely to:
    -make mistakes
    -work less/put less effort into work
    -be angry/experience negative emotions

    And the list goes on. All of those lead to significant economic losses in aggregate.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  35. Against DST and its uglier sister Year-Round-DST by skywire · · Score: 1

    There are only two rational choices: switch between the two for the perceived benefits, or remain on Standard year-round. If only one were observed year-round, people and organizations would adjust their schedules to be at what they consider the optimal actual times of day. Some might even have summer and winter schedules. They could and would as easily do this with Standard time as with Daylight. All else thus being equal, only an idiot would suggest that it is better to observe the time of the time zone one hour to the east. Any aliens visiting a planet on which everyone set their clocks one hour off would surely conclude that there is no intelligent life there.

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  36. Against it getting dark at 4:00pm by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to stay on DST year round. I've never seen the point in getting up to go to work in the dark, and it getting dark before leaving the office. Why not go to work in the dark and have some time outside at the end of the day? Why have "high noon" occur way before noon? (Admittedly, if you live on the tail end of a timezone, it'll be closer to noon when the sun's highest.) OK, so there were some farming rationals back when we were an agricultural nation, or energy saving theories and stuff, but nowadays, let's just be practical.

    1. Re:Against it getting dark at 4:00pm by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      The farmer thing isn't true. Farmers don't give a sh*t what time it is, they work with the sun.

    2. Re:Against it getting dark at 4:00pm by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      If you stay on DST year round, won't schedules eventually gravitate towards everything happening an hour later? And eventually, somebody will get the brilliant idea to switch the clocks forward another hour...

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  37. sames as everything by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Same as everything I guess. Fuck daylight savings time.

  38. Shift the time zones by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Move all the time zomes seven and a half degrees to the west, and leave it alone dammit! Do the math, you'll understand.

    Above say, 40 degrees latitude north and south DST might have a purpose, but to do this in the tropics is beyond absurd. And celestial noon should never occur before noon on the clock, never.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Shift the time zones by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      And another thing! Move the prime meridian to the international dateline! Having it in Greenwich is just another vestige of the British Empire.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Shift the time zones by mr_jrt · · Score: 1

      I hope you're trying to take the piss...I really do.

      You do realise that the international dateline (aka. the anti-meridian) is on the opposite side of the word from Greenwich, aka. the prime meridian? Having the international dateline as the prime meridian would result in the international dateline running through...Greenwich, which would then result in strip running through Europe where countries were a day apart. Route it around the west of the British isles and then you result in everything west of the Atlantic coast being a day apart, so Europe and the Americas would be even further apart, time-wise, as opposed to America and Russia/Asia being a day apart as things stand. Might look like it makes sense given the US-centric maps presumably in use over there (i.e. http://gabelli-us.com/WORLD%20...), but there ones centred on the primary landmass makes far more sense to me as it doesn't have to split any land masses: http://www.mapsofworld.com/ima..., which is also one of the reasons why the prime meridian is exactly where it is.

      --
      Boo.
    3. Re:Shift the time zones by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Having the international dateline as the prime meridian would result in the international dateline running through...Greenwich...

      That's whack! There is no reason they both can't be in the middle of the pacific ocean. Then you don't need the 180 degree east and west. It will just be a 360. Time zones will be much more logical and it will be easier to figure out what day it is where. And you will split even less land mass. Not only that. England will be right in the middle of the map, at the 180 degree point, like being the center of the universe. They shouldn't be happier. The prime meridian is in Greenwich strictly out of tradition. It made sense at the time, not any more.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Shift the time zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont math very well do you?
      Whereever the PM goes, the IDL automatically must be 180degrees the other side.

    5. Re:Shift the time zones by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. The IDL can be the prime meridian. As man made objects on a man made map we can put them where we want them, and it makes sense to have both in the same place. The day begins at 0 degrees instead of 180 degrees out of phase.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  39. against it! by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    It's, at best, outdated and, at worst, costing the US economic losses.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:against it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think international

  40. I have twin infants, I never sleep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you have to deal with the realities of multiple young children in your household abstractions such as time zones matter a lot less to you. The master clock/s in my home are roughly synchronised peristaltic ones.

  41. Just get up an hour early by msobkow · · Score: 1

    If it turns your crank, get up an hour early. But DST is a hangover from the stone age and should be abolished.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  42. I've said it before, I'll say it again. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    Set the whole darn world to Zulu time and leave it alone. No more of this "my time or your time?" or dateline hassles.

    1. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so then I'll asking what time do you get up over there. And traveling be really weird when the sun rises and sets at totally off times from what you are accustomed to. Our watches need to match the sun as closely as possible, not some arbitrary point in the UK.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why doesn't my watch face rotate such that the top is always the time of the sun's apex? So many people live outside an area where 12:00 is the high point of the sun that the entire concept of time zones' efficacy is absolute garbage. Not everyone in the world works a nine-to-five in their time zone, either. Hell, I live in an EST area, and until very recently, I worked 19:00-07:00.

      You are not arguing for time zones adjusted for local custom as opposed to universal time with the contingency that one must become familiar with local custom for a given longitude. The contingency is always there; it's even more specific; not everyone in a given vertical stripe of the earth will work the same hours. It's just assumed not to be ther by those who have never had to work with anyone in Spain or anywhere else in the world with typical working hours outside those of your comfort zone. Not to mention the fact, as I mentioned, that the day shift isn't the only shift.

      We may as well go to Zulu. Then everyone on the US eastern seaboard ccould work from 14:00-22:00, and everyone in the world will know what they meant.

    3. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a sundial thing. Under the present system, they work without modification no matter where you are.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, sundials don't work everywhere. The thing that casts the shadow has to be raised or lowered by latitude.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      But noon is still at 12, and the thing is *dead on balls accurate*.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:I've said it before, I'll say it again. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Accurate for sun time. The length of a solar day differs over the year, because the noon-to-noon time is affected not only by the Earth's rotation but also its revolution around the Sun, and since the Earth's orbit is slightly elliptical that varies in speed. If you're looking for mean local time, your sundial is going to be several minutes off much of the year.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  43. Grrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have nothing but pure hatred for clock switching.
    So I don't do it....

    If I ran for office, my platform would be to kill clock switching and pennies. Fuck Pennies!

    1. Re:Grrr by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Fuck Pennies!

      No no no, you've got it all wrong. Ass pennies.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Grrr by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      At one point in distant history, the US government debated issuing a half-penny, and decided it wasn't worthwhile. That half-cent, accounting for inflation, would be worth a dime today.

      This means that we are still dragging around a coin that is worth 1/10th the value of a coin that was considered too worthless to bother minting.

      The only reason the penny still exists is because we round things to the nearest 1/100th of a dollar, instead of the nearest 1/10th

  44. Against it! Especially in Florida by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 2

    Unlike most of the US Eastern time zone, DST causes Floridians to have to get up in the dark. That's completely ridiculous. The whole premise of daylight saving time is that you have an extra hour of daylight in the morning, which Florida never had. Because Florida is the southernmost state in the Eastern time zone, and also because Florida is west of most of the Eastern time zone, 6:00 AM EDT is ALWAYS before sunrise everywhere in Florida. Florida needs DST about like we need snowplows. My first choice would be for the Florida legislature to exempt Florida from DST (which they can do). The rest of the country can do whatever. I'm also heartily sick of changing the time on like a dozen gadgets twice a year. I have seen one plan for year-round DST which I can support. It also re-aligned the time zones, putting Florida into the central time zone. This results in Florida staying at GMT +5, which is the same as EST now. For most of the country, DST might make a certain amount of sense -- in the summer. In the spring, fall or winter, it's just silly. The rationale that DST saves energy is probably obsolete -- especially in Florida. In the old days, the primary energy consumption was lights. Now it's air conditioners. When people come home early in the afternoon, it's hot, and they run the AC more. It's very likely DST is wasting energy. DST has picked up a weird constituancy over the years. Many people have never lived without it. A lot of people believe either literally or emotionally that DST is responsible for nice spring weather and longer summer days. Belive it or not, the days were as long, and the weather as nice without federal legislation.

    --
    Computers obey me.
    1. Re:Against it! Especially in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 6:00 AM EDT is ALWAYS before sunrise everywhere in Florida.

      Sunrise tomorrow morning here in Miami is 6:29am. It's not the big of an issue.

    2. Re:Against it! Especially in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easier and better solution is for the US to just get rid of Florida.

  45. abolish it by johnrpenner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the theoretical amount it saves is outweighed by the recurring adjustment cost it incurs.

    they should string the guy by his toenails who invented this ridiculous aberation.

  46. It's stupid - switch to GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think the confusion is in regards to what time is displayed on the clock in the zone they're calling, I think it's where in that region's circadian rythm are the residences.

    Ergo, nobody in tokyo gives a shit that New York's clocks read 4pm...they care that when they call the people in New York aren't dead asleep in the middle of their night. so unless you convince half the planet to be nocturnal...GMT doesn't actually solve anything.

  47. Atlantic Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left the US, renounced my citizenship, and settled in the Eastern Caribbean just so I could live under the sanity of AST and be rid of DST forever.....well that and the whole police state/fascist thing.

  48. The right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The root cause here is that the length of the day, and the relative start and end times, shift over the course of the year. Instead of working around that, we should address it directly.

    We need to get some research money devoted to the stabilization of the Earth's orbit, so that the days are uniform all year round. While we are at it, we can slow the orbit down just a hair and get rid of leap year.

    The most frustrating aspect of human behavior is this uncompromising desire to work around problems rather than just solve them.

    1. Re:The right answer by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      I know you are kidding, but I'll just add a couple points: 1) The Earth's orbit is quite stable; the seasons are caused by the fact that the Earth's axis of rotation is inclined its orbit normal. To make it an equinox year-round, fix that. 2) To slightly increase the period of the Earth's orbit around the Sun, we actually need to speed it up! Orbital mechanics are not always intuitive :)

  49. do you even notice? by silfen · · Score: 1

    All my calendars, clocks and phones adjust automatically, even when traveling. Why is this even an issue?

    1. Re:do you even notice? by CAOgdin · · Score: 1

      Because, near the changeover days, I have to take special care to coordinate timing with colleague meetings via the Internet, some of whom live in rational countries that don't let a Charcoal-making company buy a change in clock times (so there's more outdoor cooking time available in the Summer).

      I agree with the poster above who said it all in one word: LeaveItTheF*ckAlone!

    2. Re:do you even notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biological clock does not adjust automatically.

    3. Re:do you even notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave WHAT the fuck alone?

    4. Re:do you even notice? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      You might want to be a bit careful about those "automatic" adjustments in your devices time/dst/zone settings. I recently went to a conference for work and for some reason my phone "auto adjusted" to the neighboring timezone, over a hundred miles away. Luckily I noticed the discrepancy between my phone and a clock in the motel room otherwise I would have been an hour late to my first meeting.

  50. Depends on Latidude as much as Attitude by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    The daylight to dark ratio is approximately constant only in the tropics. There is gets light about 6am and dark about 6pm year round and with almost no twilight between the two. The further north you go the greater the difference between daylight and dark hours becomes until you reach the arctic circle (I left out the southern hemisphere intentionally -- there is very little land at the higher southern latitudes) where there is about 6 months of daylight and six of darkness. The whole thing about DST is so artificial anyway. Until the rail roads set up standard time zones in the US each town and village had its on time based on local noon by the sun.

    However, I know that in my case sunlight in my bedroom window makes me wake up more easily and feel more refreshed than being awakened in darkness. This seems to be at least somewhat invariant as to the actual number of hours of sleep I got within limits. Since I inhabit the temperate zone in the Northern hemisphere I would much prefer to just hibernate through the 3 to 6 months of winter (depending on latitude) we have here and not worry about changing from DST and back.

  51. Dead Set Against It by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I think daylight savings time should be abolished. It's an anachronism from the days when America was mostly an agrarian society. Now we justify it so that kids have more light for when they wait for the school bus. We justify it in the name of safety. I loved not having to deal with daylight savings time when living in Arizona.

  52. Get rid of it! by Northern+Dean · · Score: 1

    I hate daylight savings time. There is no need for it - we can manage just fine without it, thank you very much. If business is so affected by the changing sunrise and sunset times, let them change their hours! Like they often have to do anyway, because DST messes up the day!

    Good riddance, I say!

  53. Hate it by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Pick one and stay with it. Don't care if it's normal time or DST, just leave it the fark alone.

    Remember a few years back when the congress clowns decided to futz with the DST dates? I've got 3 clocks that automatically change the time. Based on the old dates. So now I have to manually set my clocks, then a few weeks later do it again. I swear at congress the whole time I'm futzing with them.

  54. Against DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is stupid as well as most of Indiana being in the the Eastern Time zone being stupid as well.

  55. Against it! by RR · · Score: 1

    I don't care whether it's DST all year or standard time all year, but I hate switching back and forth. It's responsible for so much loss of life and productivity. I feel that DST switching is a twice yearly reminder that our "betters" in Congress are in charge and easily capable of messing with our lives. Until it's eliminated, I'll continue voting against my local Representative and Senators.

    --
    Have a nice time.
  56. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    As far as I can see now it just screws with people's sleep cycles and schedules to no particular effect.

    You don't think that bright sunlight streaming into bedrooms for an extra hour all summer won't screw with peoples' sleep cycles even more?

    Before clocks, people probably naturally implemented daylight savings time by waking up at sunrise. Now that our whole lives are tied to external schedules, not having DST is more artificial than having it.

  57. Sux... by BlindBear · · Score: 2

    One of my reasons for moving from Sydney to Brisbane in 1990 was to escape living in a DST regime. I have never heard a good reason for daylight saving ever. It just fcuking sux. I had 20 years with it and I have now had 24 years or so without it, and No DST wins hands down.

    --
    I prefer Classic Slashdot.
  58. Against It by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Complexity isn't your friend.
    Whatever historical value DST may have had left the building with Elvis.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  59. Fiat timekeeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say if you can't stick to one time, either the local time zone, or even just UTC, the whole year round, then let's abolish all this newfangled railway time and go back to local solar clocks. ;-)

    1. Re:Fiat timekeeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, seriously, how can you justify fucking with people's circadian rhythms twice a year just so some fucking inconsiderate, selfish shopkeepers can make a couple of dollars more? If that isn't proof positive that legislatures are nothing but glorifed cathouses, nothing is.

      At the tone, the time will be 20:36 UTC, minus 81 degrees, 37 minutes, and 25 seconds...

  60. A colossal waste of time and resources by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I think it's completely pointless.

    At the latitude where I live, the sun sets after 2100 PDT in the summer. That would still be 2000 PST, with an hour and a half of twilight after that. What more do people want?

    In the winter the sun sets at 1600 PST. Even 1700 PDT wouldn't buy much, particularly since that would mean sunrise at 0900 PDT.

    ...laura

  61. In the dark by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    Because it's dark at fucking 4pm.

  62. first beta, now polls masquerading as stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can type more than that for your comment.

  63. For it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the change! (Change is good). Seriously it adds some flavor to the year - going on DST is great for those long summer evenings, and coming off of it gets you ready for the Christmas holiday season.

    And for those who have trouble adjusting their body clocks for a 1 hour time change (really?), then lets stay on permanent DST.

  64. Dumb is as dumb does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap! I can't believe that there are as many dumb asses in the USA as we have in South Africa and Queensland, Australia. The clock, 24 hours in a day, etc is artificial. We made this shit up! So who cares what your stupid time piece says.. If the sun is up it is daytime. You have not lost or gained shit. Your kids will not get more skin cancer and your curtains will not fade... FFS get a grip!

  65. Against it. by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

    Has safety and productivity costs, doesn't save energy in modern society, ultimately pointless. Just leave our sleep alone.

  66. Against changing clocks twice a year by david_bonn · · Score: 1

    If you have ever worked on software that stored data hourly, having one day of the year have twenty three hours and one day of the year have twenty five hours is enough to make you weep in frustration.

    1. Re:Against changing clocks twice a year by DERoss · · Score: 1

      How then do you deal with the occasional leap-second, in which the last minute of a calendar quarter has 61 seconds?

  67. Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like having another hour of daylight all summer. Yes, there are people that get up at 5 AM and it does not matter to them, but that is not typical.

  68. dunno... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    The original idea was to get more out of the extra hours of daylight. But that was suggested before the introduction of electric lighting.

    These days it seems like mucking with numbers for no good reason.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  69. Split the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Move the clocks 30 minutes one time, and never change them again. It is an annoyance to go through this change.

  70. sucks by __aaacoe2998 · · Score: 1

    Daylight Savings Time can suck my dick!

  71. Lousy Farmers by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    First time I've ever been early for work. Except for all those daylight savings days.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  72. Against it by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Just get rid of the stupid thing. Unlike the high costs that are associated with changing when it is, which we got to witness only a few years ago, the costs of abandoning it entirely should be minimal. Even on any automated systems that are set to automatically adjust for DST when it happens, it would typically only involve disabling a setting that specifies that you want it to use DST in the first place.

  73. Assassinate Daylight Savings Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST known throughout the world as the USA zombie Daylight Savings Time should be assassinated ASAP.

    USA is the Laughing Stock of the World on this right in the butt crack of UK.

    Give it UP.

    Get it RIGHT.

    Stop the INSANITY!

    I have doubts. BIG doubts.

  74. Heart attacks by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

    If changing the time by one hour gives you a heart attack then you were really a time bomb to begin with.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Heart attacks by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      If changing the time by one hour gives you a heart attack then you were really a time bomb to begin with.

      Spring DST has also been found to cause statistically relevant increases in suicide, car accidents, and accidental injury.

      And with a population of 350+ million, 1 in a million events happen with alarming regularity.
      So yea, there are plenty of people with ticking time bombs waiting to go off in their chests.
      The extra stress of mild sleep deprivation is more than enough to set them off.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  75. I'd like to flip it bigtime by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I work in an office all day and I don't care if it's light or dark outside while I'm at the office. Already today it's sunrise at 8AM and sunset at 4PM and in the darkest part of the year the sun gets up at 10 AM and goes down at 2:30 PM. In other words it's dark when I go to work and dark again when I leave, it's depressing and I'm basically never out in the sun except on weekends. Whether I work or am at home while it's dark doesn't matter, as I use roughly the same amount of lights anyway. If it was light outside when I was off work I'd have a lot more interest and opportunity to be outside which would be much better. Personally I'd like the standard working day to shift to nights like what is 1AM to 9AM today, the day 9 AM to 5PM to be the new "evening" and 5PM to 1AM the new "night" when people sleep. The important hours of daylight are no longer the work hours, it's the leisure time hours.

    I guess that's a bit unpractical for those who work outdoors and want natural light, but they're starting to be such a small part of the workforce that they should either get floodlights or work "evening" shifts when the sun is up. For office jobs, schools. hospitals, retail jobs, factory jobs etc. I don't see the big problem, maybe in agriculture, construction and transport it's more annoying but the days here are so short they'll always work some of the time in the dark already. And the transport industry I hope gets taken over by autonomous vehicles soon anyway.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:I'd like to flip it bigtime by DERoss · · Score: 1

      I work in an office all day and I don't care if it's light or dark outside while I'm at the office. Already today it's sunrise at 8AM and sunset at 4PM.

      Where I live, sunset today (after resetting 18 timing devices in my home) will be at 6:01pm.

  76. Nuke it from High Orbit by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

    Changing clocks twice a year is nuts, nuke this insanity from high orbit.

    1. Re:Nuke it from High Orbit by DERoss · · Score: 1

      Changing clocks twice a year is nuts, nuke this insanity from high orbit.

      What "twice a year"? When SoCalEd fails -- several times a year unrelated to weather -- I have to reset 7 clocks and check 3 more to make sure their battery backups kept them current.

  77. Just use random.org by ne0phyte73 · · Score: 1

    Let's use random.org each time to decide. This will bring fun into it. All the world will be watching.

  78. Against it by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see DST disappear, and a system of time zones based on lines of longitude. Every 15 degrees of longitude from the IDL being an additional hour of timezone offset.

    Knowing the timezone for a particular place would become dead simple. Know the location and you know the timezone.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
  79. Where I stand... by acroyear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is in a place where, after 15 years of /., I am sick and tired of having this very same, and pointless (since nobody ever changes anybody's minds here), discussion twice a year, every year, like clockwork.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
    1. Re:Where I stand... by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...is in a place where, after 15 years of /., I am sick and tired of having this very same, and pointless (since nobody ever changes anybody's minds here), discussion twice a year, every year, like clockwork.

      I think a poster from Melbourne had it about right.

      DST serves the needs of those who work fixed hours and the shops, parks, theaters, etc., that benefit from their patronage. The geek doesn't picture himself as being part of this class, and so he whines about the change every year.

    2. Re:Where I stand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is in a place where, after 15 years of /., I am sick and tired of having this very same, and pointless (since nobody ever changes anybody's minds here), discussion twice a year, every year, like clockwork.

      That's too bad, did you try adjusting your clock for DST? You might not feel sick and tired as you would get more sunlight into the room.

  80. So much fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not losing any sleep over it.

    1. Re:So much fuss. by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      You will in the spring!

    2. Re:So much fuss. by Slagothor · · Score: 1

      I think that sprung over your head.

  81. Against it, split the difference by stangbat · · Score: 2

    Set the clocks ahead 1/2 hour from standard time, then leave them alone. We'll get the benefit of some of the extra daylight in the evening, but not have to put up with the asinine changing twice a year.

    1. Re:Against it, split the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newfoundland is for you. They have a 1/2 hour time difference. NST (UTC-3:30)
      They are far enufe north that there is plenty of summer sunlight, 47 N. About the same as Portland OR or Seattle Wash.
      I would also point out that in Canada "Newfie jokes" are the equivalent of "polish jokes" elsewhere.

  82. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We all just move to UTC.

  83. If I conquered the world.... by jetole · · Score: 1

    ...there would be no DST. There wouldn't be any time zones either. We'd all go Zulu (UTC). 12 hour clocks would earn you time in jail. If someone on the opposite end of the planet says call me at 19:30 then you would call them exactly when they had expected to hear from you. You wouldn't need to worry about what time zone they are in, if they even have DST in that country or whether they meant morning or night. It would be hell to get used to, for our generation, but kids growing up with that wouldn't know anything else and it wouldn't be any more difficult for them to learn. I know my generation would have to get used to their bank being open from 15:00-01:00 which would be normal daylight operations and people would b***h about it as being the worst thing ever for 5 years, maybe 10 (except military folk who are used to keeping 24 hour Zulu time ), but we'd adapt and avoid all sorts of issues with our fragmented and bi-annually adjusted time. I've also heard +/- DST times severely increase depression so there's that to. Vote for me as world leader if you like what you've heard.

    1. Re:If I conquered the world.... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Add in a optional metrified variant of timekeeping and you've got my vote. :)

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  84. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROFL. Weakest argument EVER!

    It's one hour difference and it happens over a Saturday night/Sunday morning. Yes, some people work on Sundays but I would say it is a fair bet that more people do not work on Sundays than do. If you can't recover from having your sleep shifted by one hour by the following Monday morning you need to see a doctor because there is something very very wrong with you.

  85. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you've heard of this great new invention. I think they call them "curtains".

  86. EXTREMELY against it by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    DST is not only completely useless for its "intended" purpose (saving energy), it is actually *harmful*. It doesn't save energy at all, in fact it uses MORE energy. And every time they "extend" it, it uses more energy still. And that's not counting the health problems it causes. In my case it doesn't harm me *that* much since I can just go to bed early on that one night. But other people are not as sleep flexible as I am. I can pretty much change my internal clock on a whim, but not everyone can do that. And it has been proven to cause a *lot* of health issues (due to stress and lack of sleep due to a lot of people NOT being able to adjust their internal clocks). So in short...not only does it not do what it's intended to do, it does the OPPOSITE (cause people to use MORE energy rather than saving it), while cause major health issues for a sizeable number of people at the same time. It needs to be done away with, the sooner the better.

  87. Swatch Internet Time by noelhenson · · Score: 1

    Or Beat Time. I loved it back in 1998. I still love the idea. Simple, decimal, universal time.

    Swatch Internet Time

    1. Re:Swatch Internet Time by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's based on French time (UTC+1). They tried decimalising time in the revolution. That didn't work out too well.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:Swatch Internet Time by lager_monste · · Score: 1

      With Internet Time they changed the time line to BMT = Biel Mean Time. (yes it is GMT+1, UTC+1, CET)
      Biel/Bienne is in the middle of the watch region of Switzerland and it sits on the border of the Swiss German and French speaking parts of Switzerland, its a bilingual town.
      So it is Swiss based.

      And really . . . it will be the last clock change we would ever need as all clocks worldwide will be synchronized.
      It just that your working day start time will vary depending on where you are in the world, but clocks will never have to be adjusted again.

      A huge change to everyone but I think the benefits will make it worth while.
      (and while we are at it USA/UK, consider the metric system)

  88. While you're at it, get rid of timezones. by nashv · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a good logical reason as to why the whole world can't be on a single time zone. I mean, airlines and airplanes already operate on UTC (Universal Time Co-ordinated, which is just GMT but without the DST adjustments)

    Will it really be that jarring if sunrise occurs at 6.PM wherever you are? It will get rid of this entire timezone mess altogether.

    --
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    1. Re:While you're at it, get rid of timezones. by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Yes, Yes, Yes!!!
      And someone has already registered "getridoftimezones.org" ;-)

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    2. Re:While you're at it, get rid of timezones. by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      UTC = GMT all year long. GMT doesn't change for DST.
      (more correctly: There is a minor different between UTC and GMT, as UCT has no leap seconds, so they differ by a few seconds, but all year long)

      Why to people always get this wrong?

      GMT NEVER CHANGES!

      *sheesh*

    3. Re:While you're at it, get rid of timezones. by nashv · · Score: 1

      I admit I made a mistake. The reason why this is so is because the abbr. 'GMT' is so often used to depict UK Time / BST. And that has DST adjustments. Nonetheless, I stand corrected about GMT and tip my hat to you for the new knowledge you gave me.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
  89. For it and Against it! by TimeZone · · Score: 1
    I would like 12:00 noon every day to coincide with a local solar maximum. I realize that makes things difficult for, say, towns that are 50 miles east/west separated, so I'd be willing to keep the current time zones, and say that for the Eastern time zone, 12 noon every day corresponds to local solar maximum in Washington DC. This, to me, would be ideal. I was glad to see the idea implemented in Neal Stephenson's Anathem.

    TZ

    1. Re:For it and Against it! by silverdr · · Score: 1

      I would like 12:00 noon every day to coincide with a local solar maximum.

      Why? And what for? Relativity aside - time is one. Everywhere on the planet. UTC is the way to go.

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  90. Haha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Daylight Saving Time is a thing that is imposed by Americans to countries that do not need it. Down here in my country (Mexico) we already have enough sun hours in winter and summer and maybe it would useful only for the northern states behind USA border. Also this measurement was valid when people used to read paper books, children played outside and Pop and Mom stayed in the porch talking while the pies cool off in the window. That was nice 1940s-1960s.

    Nowadays, people use phones, videogames, tablets, internet, e-readers and watch netflix, etc. And these things always need energy or even you cannot use them outside in the sunlight (duh!). Not matters you use it one hour later or soon, the battery won't give you bonus energy for move your clock. And no, don't come with tales about that everybody can purchase a solar battery because they are still expensive or hard to find or not have enough power for fill a house full of modern devices. Think now in the Internet of Things, add more devices that must be ON for get their bits and bytes form the Internet for do their work. Things in future won't be better.

    So this silly thing just remain like a excuse to say that we care about the planet and we are a "friendly country".

  91. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you've heard of this great new invention. I think they call them "curtains".

    Window treatments are generally not that effective unless you buy expensive and ugly "total blockout" versions. Why should I have to do that just to appease DST whiners?

  92. Everyone should just use GMT by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 1

    Stay on GMT - so here we would start work at midnight and work until 0900. If you travel somewhere you figure out in advance what time they start work/stores open and you're fine. Too easy.

    1. Re:Everyone should just use GMT by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Exactly! except that we should talk about UTC, rather than GMT.

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    2. Re:Everyone should just use GMT by DERoss · · Score: 1

      GMT was rendered obsolete in 1972. The current international standard is UTC (Universal Time Coordinated).

  93. Obligatory XKCD by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Nothing to do with DST, though. But that's probably because this xkcd makes sense, and DST does not.
    http://xkcd.com/1335/

  94. Extra Hour Each Saturday and Sunday, Here's How by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    Forget changing the clocks twice a year, let's do it twice a week. On Friday Night, 3pm will magically jump to 5pm, then Saturday and Sunday will both be 25 hours days where each day of the weekend gets ONE EXTRA HOUR EVERY WEEK! WHO HOO!

    The stock market can just close an extra hour early on Friday.

    I also have a plan for a METRIC DAY! This whole 60 seconds in a minute thing is ridiculous, it should be 100 metric seconds in a metric hour in a 20 hour metric day. Who ever came up with the stuff just wasn't thinking.

    24 hours in a day... BAH!

  95. Against it! by RR · · Score: 1

    Honestly, every year, twice a year, the DST haters come out of the woodwork, because apparently adjusting your clocks twice a year is soooooo difficult. ... And if you're one of those people who uses their smartphone as their alarm clock and pocket watch, you never have to worry about the adjustment; smartphones and computers make the adjustment automagically, *and* they even alert you that this happens.

    You're an idiot (from Greek: "idios," meaning someone thinking only of yourself). Just because you find it so relaxing to change your clocks on cue like an animal in a circus, doesn't mean I want to do that.

    There's nothing magic about the clocks in smartphones and computers. Those things take a lot of human labor to build and maintain, and frequently the humans make mistakes. Which you can't fix because with all that "magic," they leave out the manual controls. Or have you forgotten how iPhones sometimes make people late to meetings, or how Zunes used to die completely, or how every new program that deals with local time acts weird during the time switches, or how your unpatched system would show you the wrong time for about a month ever since this latest time switch?

    I hate experiencing anxiety every time I get a new gadget that has a magical networked clock, wondering whether the clock will change correctly, or whether I'll unnecessarily wake early in the autumn or come to work late in the spring. That's on top of the general misery of changing my biological clock, and knowing that all this hassle is scientifically proven to be wrong and counterproductive but still it continues.

    I don't mind having more sunlight in the afternoon. I hate changing the clock.

    --
    Have a nice time.
  96. UTC or go home by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    At a prior company I had all of the systems my department used set to UTC, they were not user-facing devices but sure made our jobs easier, there would always be a big hoopla about going in to and out of summertime settings in all the other areas--and massive headaches for everything that didn't work right--meanwhile our staff just relaxed. Even set our wall clocks to UTC for easy reference.

    1. Re:UTC or go home by silverdr · · Score: 1

      UTC is the way to go! About the only two drawbacks are that some people will have to get used to a)date/day of week change somewhere during daytime, and b) celebrating New Year in full sunlight, which makes fireworks less impressive ;-)

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  97. Wrong. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2

    Obviously, the length of an hour should be scaled to the latitude.

    We have the technology now - with GPS.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  98. People don't complain when they are happy by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hear a lot of complaining about daylight savings time, but I really don't hear much in the way of support in favor of it.

    That's because people tend to be loud if they don't like something but tend not to say much if they either like it or don't care. After all - what's the point of cheering for DST since that is what we already have? Yea for the status quo?

    Personally I wish we would go to Daylight Saving Time year around. I want as much time with sunlight after work as possible. When we shift back to standard time I go to work when it's dark and come home when it is dark. With DST I would at least get an hour or so of daylight in the winter.

    1. Re:People don't complain when they are happy by lazybeam · · Score: 2

      I have the option of working 7-3 or 10-6 (or anything in between). More businesses need this flexibility! It would also lessen the peaks in traffic. It would also nullify any benefit of DST.

      I used to work a 15 minute walk from the beach. I would have an early morning swim before work in summer. :)

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    2. Re:People don't complain when they are happy by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Back in the late 90's and early 00's the city I was living in did something similar. All the businesses staggered their arrival and departure times. So you'd have some getting in at 5am, leaving at 1pm, 6/2, 7/3, etc. In that town, it was mainly a mix of medium and heavy industrial and a few warehouses that were national parts distribution. It worked very well for them. Some places had 500+ employees, lot of highway traffic as well.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:People don't complain when they are happy by chipschap · · Score: 0

      That's because people tend to be loud if they don't like something but tend not to say much if they either like it or don't care.

      Ah, yes, the famous "silent majority."

  99. More like New York To Chicago. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Statistics show that the heart attack rate shows a small but significant peak following the weekend DST is activated. You're fucking with the biorhythm of people in ways that are only rivaled by forcing them to travel from east to west coast twice a year and having to adjust the time accordingly

    It's just one hour "zone time" change, remember.

    Coast to coast would be three hours. USA Time Zone Map - 12 Hour Format

    When researchers in Sweden examined the impact of daylight saving time on heart attack rates in that country, they discovered that people had slightly fewer heart attacks on the Monday after they set their clocks back in the fall and slightly more heart attacks in the days after they set their clocks ahead in the spring.

    The effect of the spring transition to daylight saving time on heart attack rates was slightly greater for women than men, and the fall effect was more pronounced in men than in women. And the effect was consistently more pronounced in people under age 65 than for those 65 and older.

    Daylight Saving Time May Affect Heart

    So more time that I have to deal with screen glare, yeah, that's what I want!

    It sounds like you're suffering from separation anxiety whenever you are away from your desktop, smartphone or tablet. You might want to cut back on the caffeine and spend more time outdoors.

  100. How early do you go to bed? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You don't think that bright sunlight streaming into bedrooms for an extra hour all summer won't screw with peoples' sleep cycles even more?

    Unless you go to bed before 9PM that is a non-problem. And yes I LIKE it to be light out as long as possible in the evening. Where I live sundown is around 9PM during the summer solstice and I love it. What I don't like is having it be dark when I go to work AND when I get home. That's just depressing...

    1. Re:How early do you go to bed? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Unless you go to bed before 9PM that is a non-problem.

      The earlier you go to bed, the *less* of a problem it is. But most people go to bed somewhere around midnight or a little before. Having the sun come up before 4:30am in much of the country would just be silly, IMO.

  101. In Hong Kong by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    we dont' do DST. It's so nice. Short time differences are the WORST to deal with. I'd rather deal with 12 hour time differences, then some 1-2 hour nonsense.

  102. Re: Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At the very most, you must be 25 years old. Since you cannot seem to see beyond your own limited horizon let me tell you: its getting harder as you get older.

  103. DST is less than 100 years old by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If it turns your crank, get up an hour early.

    What good will that do? It's dark when I get up and without DST it's dark when I get home too. I don't get to pick my work hours and DST maximizes the daylight I do get.

    But DST is a hangover from the stone age and should be abolished.

    Daylight Saving Time is a less than 100 years old. The first implementation was in 1916 in Germany.

    1. Re:DST is less than 100 years old by msobkow · · Score: 1

      We are no longer the agrarian society that was in place when DST was put in place to appease the farming community.

      For the same reason, schools should not have "summer holidays" -- the farm kids no longer work the farm in the summer. Hell, it's not even legal for them to do so any more in a lot of jurisdictions.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:DST is less than 100 years old by mrbester · · Score: 1

      "the farm kids no longer work the farm in the summer"

      Then what's the excuse for politicians (who never worked a farm in the first place)? They get longer holidays than I've ever had, being a farm kid who worked the farm in winter *and* summer.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  104. Change the Analog clock batteries by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    I have analog clocks in three strategic locations in my studio apartment: bathroom, kitchen and office. I can look up and see the time from anywhere in my apartment. When DST was roughly six months, I switched out the AA batteries before changing the time. Alas, Congress changed DST to eight months. Some clocks drift more so than others between battery changes. PITA!

  105. Hate switching by markdavis · · Score: 1

    I *HATE* changing time and pretty much everyone I know hates it too.

    It is stupid, outdated, and without merit.
    It wastes resources and time.
    It causes scheduling nightmares.
    It is a serious health problem for many people.

    We need to just either stay on summer time or winter time and leave it the hell alone. My vote would be summer time.

  106. Against it by methano · · Score: 1

    I'm against it, that's all. That's all you wanted, right?

  107. DST - An Irrational Pain by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 2

    Studies have concluded DST is more expensive than standard time in energy costs (http://www.nber.org/papers/w14429.pdf), the last rule change, extending it by another month was estimated to have cost the US between $550M and $1B and may adversely affect accidents and medical conditions.

    Do away with the time shift and set it to standard permanently, or set it to saving time, but stop the incessant back and forth, it's just plain silly.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  108. For it! Especially everywhere. Year around. by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The whole premise of daylight saving time is that you have an extra hour of daylight in the morning

    Umm, no. It is so you have an extra hour of daylight in the evening. Spring FORWARD. That means 8pm becomes 9pm. Without DST the sun would set where I live at 8pm instead of 9pm. I will happily sacrifice an hour of darkness in the morning to gain it after work where it is actually useful to me.

    This results in Florida staying at GMT +5, which is the same as EST now.

    That's because Florida IS in the east. Except for some of the panhandle most of Florida is east of Michigan which is in EST and even the most western parts of Florida are no further west than Chicago which is close to the eastern edge of the Central time zone.

    I'm also heartily sick of changing the time on like a dozen gadgets twice a year.

    All my clocks except for the one on my microwave adjust automatically. All my computers, phones, wall clocks, etc. Time to upgrade I guess.

    Belive it or not, the days were as long, and the weather as nice without federal legislation.

    Believe it or not our clock system is arbitrary so we should set it to the way that makes us the happiest.

  109. First off, it's idiotic. You could have the same.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...effect by declaring everyone get up an hour early and shift your day schedule. Or not, its up to you. The entire thing is nonsensical. Daylight time is pointless.

  110. That's what I want! by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I think it's completely pointless.

    I agree. We should go to DST year around.

    At the latitude where I live, the sun sets after 2100 PDT in the summer. That would still be 2000 PST, with an hour and a half of twilight after that. What more do people want?

    I want exactly that. I want it to be light as long into the evening as practical.

    In the winter the sun sets at 1600 PST. Even 1700 PDT wouldn't buy much, particularly since that would mean sunrise at 0900 PDT.

    It would buy me an hour of daylight during my waking hours in the winter. It's depressing going to work when it is dark and coming home when it is dark again.

  111. For it by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see DST disappear, and a system of time zones based on lines of longitude. Every 15 degrees of longitude from the IDL being an additional hour of timezone offset.

    That causes even more problems. You get weird effects like half of a town being on one time zone and the other half being and hour different. If you think that isn't a problem I can introduce you to some folks who live right next the the border of a time zone. Trust me, it's a problem and it's a bigger problem if it doesn't follow municipal or preferably state boundaries. I used to work at a company that had a plant in Indiana back when the state was bisected between EST and CST. It caused no end of headaches.

    Knowing the timezone for a particular place would become dead simple. Know the location and you know the timezone.

    I don' t know a single person aside from a few surveyors who could tell you what their longitude is. That's not something anyone who isn't a pilot or ship navigator pays attention to.

    1. Re:For it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't know what their longitude is, but their smartphone GPS does, and could show them their current timezone. Multiples of 15 degree longitude would now be important, so they would be clearly shown on Google Maps and eventually you'd learn where it slices your neighborhood.

  112. Bad design leads to problems. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    On the contrary, it's bad design that leads to irreconcilable differences which cause all kinds of headaches.

    Correctly handling time in computers is trivial from a (new) design POV, simply store everything in UTC and translate it to whatever the local display requires, if the original local version of the UTC timestamp is important then you also store the tz offset and dst flag, best to do this anyway since unimportant things have a habit of becoming important soon after release.

    Unfortunately the kind of implementation you allude to is far to common in the commercial world, worse still it's software "engineers" who are to blame because their original design either failed to consider different time zones or believed they were unimportant. As developer's we can promote an understanding of UTC, so next time you're writing code to display tz information, suggest that UTC should also be displayed. Online video games are a prime example of what I'm talking about, events are advertised for US time zones, would it really hurt to add UTC for the already neglected customers down here in Oz who understand what it means wrt to their local time? "Simplifying" UTC for customers is the root of the problem, you can't do that without losing information or making the display conversion horrendously complex.

    In other words - "teach a man UTC and he will eat fish fingers all day" - or something like that.

    Accurately maintaining the official tz table is another thing altogether, it's accuracy is at the mercy of political whim, and there's nothing in the known universe more baffling than whim.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Bad design leads to problems. by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      If you think about it more, UTC is bad design too. TAI is the way to go.

    2. Re:Bad design leads to problems. by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that there is at least one exception to this idea. In personal calendars, for example in outlook, someone may have a recurring appointment on Wednesday at 11 am. This time should not change with daylight savings time, it should stay 11am regardless of what the UTC offset is.

      Having said that, I agree that everything should default UTC and exceptions such as personal calendaring should be well thought out.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  113. It gets dark before the drive home by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Drive home in the dark? Surely not from work, because if that were the case DST does nothing to help the 5-7pm commute since you're already in daylight at that time of year anyway.

    Not where I live. On the winter solstice sundown is at 5:04pm where I live. That means I'm driving home in the dark without DST.

    If you don't want to drive home in the dark then you would be best to simply advance your time zone by one hour permanently so you get an extra hour of daylight in Winter, when you actually need it.

    In case you hadn't noticed, that is exactly what DST does.

    1. Re:It gets dark before the drive home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What country are you in? In the US, we go back to standard time in the winter and "lose" an hour of light in the evening.

    2. Re:It gets dark before the drive home by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's the opposite of what DST does. We're adding the extra hour of sun when we don't need it, and taking it away when the argument of "wanting more light in the evening" would suggest we keep it.

    3. Re:It gets dark before the drive home by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Wait, so you Spring Back and Fall Forward, such that DST is a *winter* shift? That's an interesting way to do it. Tell me, where do you live?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  114. Where do you live? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The earlier you go to bed, the *less* of a problem it is.

    ??? That makes no sense. Going to bed earlier doesn't affect the amount of daylight available to me between the end of work and sundown. I do not control either when sunrise or sundown occurs nor when my shift at work starts or ends. The only thing going to be earlier might accomplish is to help me be more rested but the only impact it could have on the amount of daylight available to me is to reduce the amount of time I enjoy it.

    But most people go to bed somewhere around midnight or a little before.

    Most adult people I know go to bed somewhere between 9-11PM because, you know... jobs. Not sure what orifice you pulled the "around midnight" bit from. Doesn't describe very many people I know who are past college age.

    1. Re:Where do you live? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      I've been an adult for decades, and I've never met anybody who is not a mother-in-law that regularly goes to bed at 9pm.

    2. Re:Where do you live? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, you haven't met me, but for some reason I wake up stupid early every day. This morning it was 2am. Yesterday it was 3. It doesn't really seem to correlate to when I go to bed, so I have to go to bed early. I went to bed at 8 last night. If I'd gone to bed at 11 I'd probably still have woken up at 2.

      I guess I should take up baking. I'll have to move out of this little bumfuck town, however, which can barely keep one local bakery open four days a week.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  115. Re: Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol omg wtf BBQ.

    There's no benefit to changing the clocks. None whatsoever. We know this because one state recently switched. Mine. Every single pro argument for daylight savings time has now been measured and found to be false.

    So we're left with "well, everyone else is doing it" as a reason to do so. And in case anyone decides to logic themselves out if it for some reason there's always someone like you. "What do you mean you find it hard to get up? What are you some kind of pussy?"

  116. leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rather have more sunlight in the evening. Otherwise there is very little sunlight at 5PM, that you can't do anything outside. I also hate the sun rising early and waking me up.

    Being stupid is more dangerous then a time change.

  117. Drop the entire idea. by SmoothTom · · Score: 1

    If there are specific groups that need to vary their times for doing things depending on season, it should be up to them to simply change the time *they* do them, not force the rest of the country to screw with wasteful time changes twice a year.

    Pick a time zone and just stick with standard time.

  118. Between DST, JDK Date and Oracle DB's by MegOnWheels · · Score: 1

    Many countless hours dealing with time related stupidity especially when developers were originally obliged to use local time on the legacy system.

    I think the whole concept of DST should be scrapped, and I think we should just all use UTC and have midday at whatever time that happens to be in UTC.

    It would not take too long for the world to get used to it..

    While we are at it, can all computing platforms standardise on the Unix timestamp in milliseconds please.

  119. Get rid of both by silverdr · · Score: 1

    Both the timezones and the DST are obsolete, confusing, error prone, useless and completely unnecessary pieces of crap that bring more harm than good. Somebody has even registered "getridoftimezones.org" already :-) P. S. Where errors and confusion can be too costly to bear (aviation, military, ...) people got rid of those things long ago.

    --
    Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  120. Every 6 months it's the same question.... by stajp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and there is no answer.

    My vote - ditch the daylight savings time, and ditch the time zones. Lets make some timezone global, and everyone uses that timezone. I wrote a comment in Treehugger (http://www.treehugger.com/health/forget-just-getting-rid-daylight-saving-time-lets-get-rid-time-zones-and-go-local.html) 8 months ago, on the previous clock move discussion, and most of it I'll copy here:

    For the last 5000 years humans are thought that sun is high in the sky at midday. Only way to detect time were sundials (even if old Romans had hourglass or something like that, they must be watched over constantly so they were not an option for reliable timekeeping). In the last 500 years we have mechanical clocks and we defined parts of day more precisely - hours, minutes, seconds. Timezones are here only in the last 150 years, and daylight savings time in the last 70 (and most people despise daylight savings time as it's not natural).

    And daylight savings time is the argument against keeping timezones. Humans chose time measurement according to Earth rotation around the sun. On spring and autumn solstice (equinox) there is 12 hours of light and 12 hours on night. Why didn't they chose 12 as a number of hours, and not 10? Or 8? But as it is, we have hours, minutes and seconds, and our whole physics and other sciences revolve around those units.

    So what is time? Or local time? It's just a number which we, humans, decided on. There is another example of time we humans decided: Unix timestamp or epoch. Used in computers it measures number of seconds since January 1st 1970 at 00:00:00 UTC.

    What does daylight savings time has with it that's an argument for making time global? The answer: why are we moving clocks back and forth, to accommodate a system which should help us, to natural change of how long does a day and night last. Because our laws, work contracts and everything similar (again, human tools which could be changed) state the beginning and ending of an activity. And instead of changing those, we chose to move the clock?!?!?

    I agree, in global time nobody would like to go to bed at 14:00, and go to work at 23:00, because everybody thinks that 14:00 is in the afternoon and 23:00 is in the middle of the night. But for some, if we used a global time system, that 14:00 would be middle of the night, and 23:00 would be the morning. 14 is just a number, a tool. For those whose time would become global, the number would stay the same, for others it would change. But everything would change - Google calendar could not expect that 13 o'clock is time for lunch because in your region lunch is now at 4:00 (and in reality it's somewhere around noon)

    And there is another reason to change to global time real soon - space travel. When first colonist go to Moon, Mars and other planets in our solar system, how should they measure time. Locally? To the clock of some nation (first to colonize)? Should they use an Earth second or a Moon or Mars second? Should they still use a second, but set up a different number of seconds for a minute or an hours, and then use a standard 24 hours/day calculation?

    We need a global system of time NOW. Used reasonably, with changes in work laws, school calendars etc. But we need IT. Is it Swatch Internet Time, is it UTC time or anything else.

    Forces of habits are tough to beat. Only loss in global time is that 12 o'clock is not high noon, with a sun high in the sky. Oh wait, even now that's not the case if you're in a big timezone!

    So forget the dayligh savings time, forget the timezones, forget that the time on your watch has a special meaning. You'll wake up in the morning, you'll go to sleep in the evening.

    1. Re:Every 6 months it's the same question.... by geantvert · · Score: 1

      > Why didn't they chose 12 as a number of hours, and not 10? Or 8? But as it is, we have hours, minutes and seconds, and our whole physics and other sciences revolve around those units.

      Use of bases 12, 24 and 60 originates from the Babylonian time. Those numbers have a high number of divisors (relative to their values). More specifically
        - 12 is the smallest number that can be divided by 2, 3, 4 and 6
        - 24 is the smallest number that can be divided by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12
        - 60 is the smallest number that can be divided by 2-6, 8, 10, ...
        - 360 is the smallest number that can be divided by all numbers between 2 and 10 except 7, ...
        etc ..

      So any unit using those bases weither it is a time, an angle or a number of eggs can easily be divided into 2, 3, 4 or 5 parts which is convenient 99% of the cases.

  121. Battery Manufacturers by Fnord666 · · Score: 0

    You do realize that Daylight Savings Time was created by battery manufacturers in a bid to sell more 9V batteries. They have used tried and true FUD tactics to scare the sheeple into replacing the batteries in their smoke detectors unnecessarily. It worked well too. Battery sales, specifically 9V batteries, increased 38.3% the year Daylight Savings Time was introduced.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  122. I am for it by jonwil · · Score: 1

    I am in Queensland, Australia and having daylight saving would be a good thing. Firstly it would mean Sydney and Melbourne wouldn't be an hour ahead. And secondly it would mean more daylight in the evening (meaning less use of all forms of artificial lighting) and less daylight in the morning (so you dont get woken up by the 4am sunrise and then have to get back to sleep again like I was this morning)

    It also means more time after work for people to swim in pools and beaches and engage in other outdoor activities.
    And it means people aren't traveling in the dark so much when comming back from work or from those activities.

    Yes it might cause issues with it being hotter at different times of the day than it is now but that's why Willis Carrier invented air conditioning :)

  123. Well Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set the Clocks up or back 1 half hour and leave it the Fuck Alone

  124. I'm pro-all-year-DST myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wish we would switch to "daylight savings" all year round. It's my favorite. I want the dark to come as late as possible and I hate the short winter days, it's depressing.

  125. It's racist by gelfling · · Score: 1, Informative

    Also homophobic, islamophobic and misogynistic. I blame the Fucking Jews. Call me Lena Dunham.

  126. DST has nothing to do with farms by sjbe · · Score: 1

    We are no longer the agrarian society that was in place when DST was put in place to appease the farming community.

    DST never had anything to do with farms. Farms operate when the sun is up which is unaffected by DST. In fact farmers have often opposed DST for fairly minor but practical reasons.

    Got any other nonsense arguments?

    For the same reason, schools should not have "summer holidays" -- the farm kids no longer work the farm in the summer

    Apparently you do. What does that have to do with DST? That's a completely separate issue.

  127. i don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like the 4 seasons of the year. and less light is seasonal too. i dont like to change time like that. messin with things for me. just wake up the fuck up if you want the most light.

  128. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should we fiddle with the clocks just to appease people that can't figure out how to sleep when it's dark? And I don't want to hear about work - change your work hours. Not the clock. Don't have that flexibility at your job? Guess what! Curtains it is. Now you have them to appease your boss.

  129. Obligatory XKCD comic, more relevant than article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/673/

  130. Every fucking year, same old shit on slashdot by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    We get it.

    The Americans don't like DST. Fuck knows why, maybe not smart enough to figure out how to change a clock? Perhaps you live in a rural area and you're a farmer or something? Christ fuck only knows but the rest of the world has to deal with this idiot topic every year.

    From Australia, all the 'civilised' states love the shit out of it.
    I get to finish work with an hours more sunlight, period. I'm not even an outdoor person and I like it. If you have kids, dogs, hobbies, exercise routines, gardens to maintain, shopping to do, socialising and a fucking plethora of other activities, summer is vastly superior with an extra hour sunlight (yes, I know it's not an "extra hour" but it's an extra hour I can use.
    I have no issue with it being slightly darker in the morning, when I'm in the shower or on public transport on my way to work, or eating breakfast. I can't COMMIT to anything in the morning, because I have to get to work (or some of us school or whatever) - but I do like when I finish, I see a bit more of the world.

    I am continually baffled how many Americans dislike DST. Perhaps it's just a vocal minority of whiners on slashdot? Maybe a large amount of US citizens also love it?
    I wish the clocks were forward an hour or two ALL year round, not just summer.
    (Face it, we're not going to convince the world that a normal workday should be 8 till 4, so let's just fiddle with the clocks to emulate it)

    Loving DST right now, will continue to always.

    1. Re:Every fucking year, same old shit on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am continually baffled how many Americans dislike DST. Perhaps it's just a vocal minority of whiners on slashdot?

      You're a tone-deaf moron. DST is nearly 8 months and I suspect a poll here or nationwide would reflect a preference to stay on DST all year long. Instead, we are mucking about the issue and with clocks when there is very little extra daylight whichever side of the day you put it on.

  131. Stick with daylight time saving! by antdude · · Score: 1

    And don't change it ever again!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  132. I'm for and against by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    I don't give half a shit about the clocks changing, it seems trivial. What seems important to me is the fact that we can do it. We can just willy-nilly change the clocks up or down, and not everyone has to be involved in this!

    So often these days many people are talking about what needs to be done in order to make the world a better place, and they stop short of concluding, a lot of times, because they feel that it'd be to difficult to orchestrate. So always remember that changing the clocks as we do, isn't just some minor thing, and yet we can do it! Think of all of the other things that could actually be done.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  133. I strongly stand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on not caring one bit one way or another.

  134. Against it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Changing the clocks is so utterly arbitrary. If businesses or schools want to change hours during different seasons. then they should knock themselves out. Changing everyone's clocks is lunacy.

  135. Federal Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad slashfagots spend more time talking about abolishing daylight savings time instead of the Federal Reserve.

    This is why you will forever be slaves.

  136. Against it! by billyswong · · Score: 1

    Change the government office hours, don't change the clock moron!

    Lucky that my home Hong Kong has abolished that since long ago.

  137. DST == DIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Daylights Idiot time,
    a bad idea, no merit just a waste of resources working around this crap.
    Energy savings none, School kids going to school in non-darkness => depends on where you live.
    Overall this madness should stop.

     

  138. If so many people are really opposed to DST... by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 2

    Then why is it still the law? Politicians are, above all things, good at figuring out what their constituents want. I suspect that the reality is, most people are either neutral, or do like it. Those who don't like it, complain loudly twice a year; those who do like it, just stay quiet because they already have a system they like.

    1. Re:If so many people are really opposed to DST... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Politicians are, above all things, good at figuring out..." That a tiny minority of ammosexuals and gun lobbyists continues to stymie every attempt at rational gun control laws approved of by the overwhelming majority of US citizens proves that in fact you couldn't be more wrong.

    2. Re:If so many people are really opposed to DST... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when you start adjusting something, it will never stay at that point, but will keep on getting harder and harder, just like these gun laws here (up north europe). They were sensible, but now they are insane. But what the fuck would you care gunphobic. It's no away from you, so it's fine. That's pretty selfish of you. I hope they forbid something you like. Take away your hobby that you like to do.

  139. Split the difference by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    This Spring, move the clocks forward by one-half hour, then LEAVE THEM THERE ALL YEAR!!! I hate the time change - it messes me up for days, sometimes even a week or more.

    If the powers that be feel the need to dick around with time, they could at least do something useful by making 24 hour time and ISO date-time format truly universal. No more "is that AM or PM?", and no more confusion over whether 11/06/14 refers to the eleventh day of June or the sixth day of November. (And in that same spirit of good sense maybe the folks responsible for the GTK file chooser could get rid of that fscking "Today" and "Yesterday" BS).

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  140. Against it! It has no benefits. by Foresto · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, there has never been any statistically significant evidence that redefining time twice a year saves any energy, or has any other net benefit at all.

    Meanwhile, it continually wastes the time of people who have to deal with the problems that it causes; moreso than ever since the world started depending on computers, and since international interactions have become common.

    Just get rid of it, please. Forcibly playing games with people's clocks in the name of pretending that seasons don't exist is just stupid. Let businesses adopt winter hours if they want to align with daylight.

  141. Eliminate Standard Time - YAY! DST!!! LIGHT!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More sunlight with permanent DST. We also have strong evidence of accidents and heart probems caused bu the time changes every year. It's a STUPID idea to have to switch time every 6 months - for what? Complacent people who don't go outside, anyway?

  142. Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no such thing as "normal" time. "Standard" time is...wait for it....STILL COMPLETELY ARBITRARY. The only thing that makes it standard is "we've been doing it that way for a longer time than DST", which is pretty weak in the grand scheme of things.

    TLDR: winter time is no more "correct" than summer time.

  143. Totally Against it by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2

    I lived the first 45 years of my life in states that followed daylight savings time. I didn't like it when I had kids, because it seemed for a couple of weeks after the switch, they were all messed up.

    Now I live in Arizona, where we leave the damn clocks alone, and I love it. It's a minor inconvenience occasionally when relatives back east are three hours ahead instead of two, but it's great not having to deal with the time shift directly.

    As for people wanting DST because they get more daylight in the evening ... why don't you just get up earlier. It's the same amount of daylight either way, it's only YOUR schedule that doesn't allow you to enjoy it.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  144. China actually do it sort of right by dbIII · · Score: 1

    China is huge but is on Beijing time, however in regions far from Beijing people set their work times by what is sensible and not by the numbers on the clock.
    Most businesses around the world open more than 5 days already have different weekend opening and closing times. Why not different summer and winter operating times?

  145. How to spot a bad DST argument by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    If you are ranting against DST but never address the equation of time, then you haven't even figured out what the problem is let alone have solved it.

  146. DST is inane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have heard several reasons for which people support the use of DST:
    1. It creates jobs
    2. It gives farmers and others an extra hour in winter

    Whoever thinks that they will get an extra hour by using DST are sadly mistaken. It's a waste of time and money. People should stop being lazy and get up an hour earlier in winter if they want a longer day

  147. For it! Against it! Bite me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What on earth is happening to slashdot? Why in the past few days have I seen editors suggesting how our responses are phrased?

    It's almost like some new product manager had an idea in the shower on how bring in people who don't like to read, came in and told the editors this would be greeeat because then xyz people could skim and get the gist in 5 seconds, or they could run a script and repackage the responses, or they've subconsciously decided they don't like how their commentators talk amongst themselves.

    I'm honestly confused, as this isn't April 1st.

  148. Re: Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol omg wtf BBQ.

    There's no benefit to changing the clocks. None whatsoever. We know this because one state recently switched. Mine. Every single pro argument for daylight savings time has now been measured and found to be false.

    So we're left with "well, everyone else is doing it" as a reason to do so. And in case anyone decides to logic themselves out if it for some reason there's always someone like you. "What do you mean you find it hard to get up? What are you some kind of pussy?"

    I'm just responding to the "I find it hard to get up." "Changing the clocks makes people tired" arguments. Pussy arguments just like you listed.

    If 1 hour of sleep makes that much difference in your life that you whine about it every year at this time, the problem is you not switching the clocks.

  149. Time to end it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are on standard time only about 4 months out of the year. So, why do we bother? Why not either stay with standard time or daylight time and forget this ridicules change twice a year? It just makes no damn sense!

  150. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I refuse to get up before noon. Winter days are extremely short and dark. Go back to two hours of daylight savings everyday so I have time to see outside. The world looks strange with the sun from the east. Should be afternoon all the time.

  151. The life of a student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sleep all day, party all night,
    Do I even know what time it is?

  152. Against it! Especially in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. The premise is you have more daylight time in the EVENING! After work, cooking outdoors, doing yard work, golfing, committing armed robberies, raping, pillaging.

  153. Pick One, Whichever Damn One You Like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop this idiotic fuster-clocking.

  154. Let mid day MEAN mid day by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 2

    Why even mess with it? A clock is an instrument to indicate the time of day. Do I want a ruler where everything is offset by 1cm or a speedo that is offset by 10mph? Of course not. Instruments should do their best to tell things the way it is.

    1. Re:Let mid day MEAN mid day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They claim that sunrise is more important than mid day in our society. Ideally we should give time relative to sunrise (e.g. "come to work 45 min after sunrise"), but this would require smarter clocks that can perform astronomical calculations. DST is a compromise.

  155. It's for the Children, case closed. by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    When growing up at 15 degrees North in the Caribbean where we do not do DST, it was awkward at times to arrange business calls with the States... but no big deal, I couldn't understand why folks would want too go through all that twice a year.

    Now I live 34 degrees North and see what the big deal is. I am on the road to work at 6:30am and come Monday I will not be seeing children walking around, crossing streets and standing around in the dark.

    Anything that makes kids easier to avoid while driving in large portions of the continent is fine with me. All those other reasons like saving energy (NOT) can go stuff themselves.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:It's for the Children, case closed. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is the solution to change the time of everything instead of having school start an hour later? That's a perfect example of the tail wagging the dog. Also, just for reference, the children you see Monday will be getting on the bus at STANDARD time. So, if DST didn't exist at all, they would still be getting on the bus at the same time.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:It's for the Children, case closed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a parent, the main reason I wouldn't want that is due to the fact that when my kids dropoff/pickup schedules change, we have to adjust my (and my wife's) work schedules, or we have to make alternate dropoff/pickup arrangements. For example, my wife works till 5 but the school does after school care until 6. That gives her 1 hour to pickup, but if those two are out of sync, all of the sudden she can't get there in time to pickup.

      I realized its not fair to impose the current system on everyone "for the children", so I'd propose scrapping time adjustments 100% anyway. I honestly can say its tougher for my kids to deal with the hard 1 hour change twice a year as opposed to getting used to (gradual) changes in sunrise/sunset.

  156. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just deal with it. It's going to be darker in the winter and lighter in the summer,,,You go to bed an hour earlier or later, who the F cares?

  157. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    As far as I can see now it just screws with people's sleep cycles and schedules to no particular effect.

    Not "no particular effect" - the incidence of heart attacks spikes; that one can be debated whether they would have happened later anyway (probably not all of them, but there is some number).

    But the incidence of fatal car wrecks right after the time change is unmistakable. This policy literally kills people, a modern "stab them in the fucking heart at the alter of central planning" ritual, and people _still_ ignore that and wonder if there might not be extra time to mow the lawn.

    We're surrounded by sociopaths, by the millions.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  158. Who cares if it makes sense,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other studies from other countries that tried this, and there are studies from US sources (I dont have the citations right now) that claim to US consumes 30-40% more energy from daylight savings time.

    Considering most people get up at 5-6 AM and dont get home to 4-6 PM where are you saving "energy" when your using energy practically all morning/evening, times when you should be "saving energy". Businesses leave their power running 24/7 or cut down when they are not in business hours.

      I would insult you, for the funny ninja weasels joke. But I dont see how your life was complete misery before DST? And I'm curious as to how it would have?

  159. I'll take that bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get rid of it.. And while we are at it... Standardize EVERYONE to UTC time. I'm totally cool with giving up my PST/PDT for UTC.

  160. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by mrbester · · Score: 1

    Lined curtains work just fine. Plus they increase insulation when drawn over unlined ones so you don't use as much energy heating your house in the winter (when it is dark more, so they are more likely to be drawn). Think of the curtains in Victorian times. They were thick material for a reason.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  161. I stand in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do daylight savings time here. Good riddance!

  162. Computers, Chooks and Cows don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cows don't come down an hour early to be milked. Eggs still come out relative to the same time for daylight, computers frequently don't update and I'm called into fix the b#@$%@#$&^'s! .. hate hate hate! Stab!

  163. Get rid of it. AND.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get rid of timezones while we're at it. who cares if you work 9-5 or 11-7 or 3-11. one time for one world.

  164. Standard Time is the Only Time! by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    DST is not really an idea which I condone. Rather get up an hour early if you want that extra hour of sun you lazy bastard!

  165. Something international, please. by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

    I prefer something international, like e.g. http://www.newearthtime.net/

    AM/PM is crap.

    60 is crap compared to 100, but at least the linked 360-hour system is easy to 'mental sync' with GMT.

    DST etc. is crap.

    --
    urd
  166. Clocks by 12x · · Score: 0

    Russia switched to permanent DST for a few years but then recently decided to switch back to changing their clocks, why i dont know. Anyway some of the stupidity in this thread is mindblowing. Whatever time zone you're in I say just abolish standard time, stay on savings time and call it a day.

  167. STANDARD time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called a standard for damn good technical reasons.
    SAVINGS is just some concocted political anti-standard bullshit that makes no sense at all.

  168. Against it. by Simulant · · Score: 1


    Partly because I'm now posting on Slashdot at 5 am but mainly because it was a silly idea to begin with. As if pretending that it's an hour later than it actually is would improve the lives of the majority.

  169. If it wasn't for DST.... by rizole · · Score: 1

    ....Slashdot would be down two articles every year.

  170. journey7x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just move it half and hour forward next spring and stop futzing with it!

  171. Changing time is a bunch of you know what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did the same thing in the 1970's for "saving energy". Didn't work then, and it most certainly doesn't work now. Personally, I would prefer to use GMT. They do it for the black boxes in the airline industry, why not let the rest of the world utilize it? The reason the airline industry uses it: that way, no matter where the airplane is if something should happen to the craft, it is much easier to track the events that lead to the problem anywhere in the world.

     

  172. Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is true. But the reverse is also true. When DST is switched to normal time, deaths decrease for awhile after. Not that I am an advocate of DST.

  173. Ask me again in the spring by ildon · · Score: 1

    I just got an extra hour of sleep and it was great.

  174. The right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OR ---

    We make watches that arbitrarily adjust to the amount of available daylight. So, in the winter months when there is less daylight, they burn through the hours of, let's say 6am to 6pm. Then they drag through the long nighttime hours. So workdays are shorter in the winter, and longer in the summer.

    Wait, uh,...

  175. Only in the US... by VoiceOfSanity · · Score: 1

    ... is Daylight Savings Time longer than any other country in the world. That's because our politicians just HAD to screw around with it.

    Instead of starting like everyone else, going from the last Sunday in March to the last Sunday in October, the US politicians (who were more afraid of their kids walking in the dark on Halloween) decided to implement an 8-month DST, starting with the first Sunday in March and ending on the first Sunday in November. This throws a wrench into a lot of things (such as financial systems, shipments, schedules, etc.). It would be fine if we'd use the same dates as everyone else, but no, America's gotta be different, all because a few Congressmen think they can dictate time.

    Me? I'm happy with straight normal time.

  176. For it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, let's leave the clocks on DST time and we can talk about what I good idea it was during the winter solstice when sunrise isn't until 9am. Or let's do away with DST altogether and talk about it at the summer solstice when first light is 4am and last light is 8pm.

    What I really want is for everyone to leave the dates alone! I have lived through to 2 changes in the dates. The first time was to save oil but I never saw evidence of that and hated going to school while it was still dark. I remember the problems I had doing gas measurement. Every spring, we got complaints because there was an hour of zero flow. I had to explain that we had an hour in our flow history that didn't exist. But a 23 hour day was easier to log than a 25 hour day! Our log was indexed by timestamp and ever fall, we had 2 different records with identical timestamps.

  177. putrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 years of speaking english and still learning...

  178. Re:Is there anything to show benefit/harm from it by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Try living someplace where the length of the day is changing by 5 or 10 minutes every day that time of year *and* having your clock shifted an hour on top of that.

    It's a pain in the ass, and my saying so does not make me some kind of misfit or weakling. KGFY.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  179. What is this DST you all talk about? by theNetImp · · Score: 1

    I'm in Japan. When I move here from the East coast of the US I wanted to throw a party because I didn't have to change the clocks or adjust my time schedule. Changing the clocks sucks. period.

  180. I'm partial to basing time on sun rise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I raise poultry for eggs and I want to collect the eggs before I go into work... but that's because sun rise triggers them to lay their eggs.

  181. Watch it burn by gremlin_591002 · · Score: 1

    It's a waste of time. My current work schedule has me going to work in the dark summer and winter. Which is awesome because I'm usually home from work at the same time as the kids get home from school. The only thing that DST does for me is screws up my sleep schedule twice a year.

  182. Small Bash alias for timezone conversion by geantvert · · Score: 1

    Here is a convenient BASH alias I use to perform timezone conversion


    tz () {
            local D T tz
            D="$*"
            [ -n "$D" ] || D=now
            T=$(date -d "$D" +%s) || return
            for tz in "Europe/Paris" "America/Chicago" "America/Los_Angeles" "Asia/Tokyo" ; do
                    A=$(LC_ALL=C TZ="$tz" date -d "@$T" +"%c %Z (UTC%:z)")
                    printf "%-20s %s\n" "$tz" "$A"
            done
    }

    Give it any time specification supported by the 'date' command and it will print the local time in all selected timezones:

    # tz tomorrow 10:00
    Europe/Paris Mon Nov 3 10:00:00 2014 CET (UTC+01:00)
    America/Chicago Mon Nov 3 03:00:00 2014 CST (UTC-06:00)
    America/Los_Angeles Mon Nov 3 01:00:00 2014 PST (UTC-08:00)
    Asia/Tokyo Mon Nov 3 18:00:00 2014 JST (UTC+09:00)
    # tz now
    Europe/Paris Sun Nov 2 14:49:34 2014 CET (UTC+01:00)
    America/Chicago Sun Nov 2 07:49:34 2014 CST (UTC-06:00)
    America/Los_Angeles Sun Nov 2 05:49:34 2014 PST (UTC-08:00)
    Asia/Tokyo Sun Nov 2 22:49:34 2014 JST (UTC+09:00)
    # tz dec 24 23:59
    Europe/Paris Wed Dec 24 23:59:00 2014 CET (UTC+01:00)
    America/Chicago Wed Dec 24 16:59:00 2014 CST (UTC-06:00)
    America/Los_Angeles Wed Dec 24 14:59:00 2014 PST (UTC-08:00)
    Asia/Tokyo Thu Dec 25 07:59:00 2014 JST (UTC+09:00)

    Output is a bit screwed up by Slashdot.

  183. Get rid of time changes and time zones! by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    I'd love to get rid of time changes and just have Standard Time all year, but we don't need to settle for that unimaginative answer. We now have the technology to do better.

    When everybody's carrying around a smart phone -- effectively, a computer with a GPS -- then it should be easy to calculate the actual local time, solar time, any place on Earth. If you have local solar time, and you have GMT (Zulu time), then you have everything you need to coordinate the vast majority of human activity. Then time zones become redundant, and time changes would make even less sense than they already do now.

    1. Re:Get rid of time changes and time zones! by DERoss · · Score: 1

      When everybody's carrying around a smart phone -- effectively, a computer with a GPS -- then it should be easy to calculate the actual local time, solar time, any place on Earth.

      Everybody is NOT carrying around a smart phone. My wife has a dumb phone that satisfies her needs. I do not even have a dumb phone because I enjoy getting away from the phone.

  184. Pure evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I way for the military and business social planners to come up with something for no damn good reason, and inflict it on our animal psychology and mess up our biorhythms and internal clocks. Just set two clocks, one a half hour in between, one conventional. Never change the one and sleep and rise and eat lunch by it.
    Noon is always 12 o'clock. Arrive and leave work and keep appointments by the other.

  185. I vote for GMT/UTC by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    It's the same everywhere

    Instead of our current system where work/school starts at 8:00 and we adjust our clocks to compensate for the season, it would make more sense for schools and businesses to adjust their hours based on the season

    1. Re:I vote for GMT/UTC by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      There's a psychological barrier here - people who like to start at 9am would then have to start at 8am. Chances are, they would continue to start at 9am.

      Switch the clock, 8am becomes 9am, and psychologically they are starting at the same time, except they are actually starting an hour earlier.

  186. Stick with DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for stopping the change but the OP lost me at the point he said he doesn't care which side we stop on. Leave it to our government to be stupid enough to stop the clock changing on the wrong side and leave us in darkness every afternoon! Go to work in the dark and leave home in the dark. I look forward to the studies indicating a spike in suicides. (Seriously)

  187. Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes JimmyB by redelm · · Score: 1

    Most modern lives revolve around clock-time, so DST/summer time makes some sense at middle latitudes -- more natural light when lamps otherwise would be burnt in the early evening (less in the morning when fewer are burnt).

    DST make no sense at all at lower latitudes with little change in daylight hours with the seasons. Nor at very high latitudes with extreme changes.

    A bigger question is whether the benefit is worth the circadian disruption -- world-wide jetlag. This is similar to countries deciding to be on half-hour time zones -- is the benefit worth the confusion? There will always be differing values, so differing opinions. No answer unless we can set 1h jetlag = XX kWh . You can try with money as the scale, then I suspect the answer is NO DST even at middle latitudes.

  188. Never had a problem by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with it personally.

    All the clocks that I actually use switch automatically anyway.

  189. Relief is just ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... an NTP server away.

  190. Against it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always have been. Cutting off the top of the blanket and sewing it on the bottom doesn't keep me warmer. Businesses don't all start at one time, and we're moving to a global economy anyway where even time zones don't mean much. (China is on one time zone). We don't save energy. Use flex time instead.

    This is funny:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4EUTMPuvHo#t=21

  191. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the submitter. DST should become the year round standard and switching times twice a year should go away.

  192. I'm for changing the clock by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    I takes the body 1 day to adjust to a 1 hour change. So in the Spring change, just go to bed an hour earlier the night of the change.

    The effect of the change is based on your latitude, and your local sunrise or noon offset from your timezone's meridian.
    Close the the equater or close to the poles, it probably doesn't make that much difference. When close to the equator, the times of sunrise and sunset don't
    change much. When close to the poles, well you can have 24 hour darkness or sun, so it really doesn't matter what time it is. In between, though, it can have a big effect.

    Also, the more west you are in your timezone, the later sunrise and sunset occur.

    Where I am, in mid-summer, the sun sets at 10pm local time, and rises at 4am local time (DST)
    In mid-winter, the sun rises at around 8am local time (or after) (Standard Time), and sets around 5pm.

    If we were to stay with DST all year round, then the sun wouldn't rise till 9am in mid-winter - an hour after I get into work, after kids start school, etc. Yes, we'd get a slight longer evening, but I prefer some sun in the morning. And I believe the primary reason was so that children wouldn't be going to school in the dark.

    If we were to stay with Standard Time all year round, then the sun wouldn't set till 11pm in mid-summer, which is after I go to bed. (It wouldn't be dark until after midnight).

    So, yeah, I'm all for shifting the clock. We shift here on the last weekend of October and March, and that's about right. I don't see any reason to change it.

  193. I'd rather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just leave it on savings time permanently. I'd rather have the slim chance of light when I get home, as it's going to be dark when I leave in the morning for a good chunk of the year anyways...

  194. Solar time by popoutman · · Score: 1
    Make it so that the average solar noon is some time between 11.30 and 12.30 on the clock. No change of clocks during the year. Exactly as convention has had it for centuries. The timezone divisions are about right.

    If you need more time in the evening, then petition your boss to have differing hours of work. There's no real reason why you can't wake at dawn, be at work shortly after sunrise, lunch at local noon, and finish work and have hours of daylight left to play with.

    --
    - This sig deliberately left blank. Nothing to see, move along.
  195. Pick one, stick with it by forrie · · Score: 1

    This is a historical argument that really hasn't changed its tune in a long time.

    Personally, I think DST should be universally abolished. Pick one time, stick with it. This reminds me of an older post that recommended sweeping, simplified changes to our timezones here in the US, which I thought appealing.

  196. Vehemently against. by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    DST is a fascist ploy to make more money from the proletariat. In the spring, they "borrow" an hour of our time, and then give it back in the fall. Time is money. Borrowed money earns interest. Do they pay us interest on the time they borrowed from us? Nope. For each of us individually this is a paltry sum each year, but year after year for all of us it really adds up.

    I also really hate waking up before the sun comes up.

  197. anyone who cares enough to rally for change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a maniac.

  198. I'm against DST by lissnup · · Score: 1

    There are too few benefits compared to the hassles created by DST, especially as it varies between countries. UK changed clocks last weekend and I got in a terrible pickle trying to figure out when to call people in Canada. I'd like to see it phased out with all current DST zones in agreement.

  199. Stupid Time Wobbles by thrig · · Score: 1

    Let's see, let's see...

    02:15 AM cron job that did not run one Sunday, some important scheduled payments thingy, with other things then running expecting it had run, oh lord the manhours cleaning up and correcting after that disaster. Yep, servers were in US/Pacific, nice little time bombs left laying around for months until the pointless time wobble sets them off...good luck testing for that, hence the modern "just put it in UTC" to eliminate that class of problems. Alas, many servers still get placed in stupid timezones, or being so cannot be fixed (risk too high, bitrot, etc).

    Then, at another company, the on-call got woken up each and every DST wiggle, because, you know, credit card latency was now 3600.00049996 seconds, or something, and hey! send pages! at who knows what hour; can't fix that software, legacy stack you see. On a positive note, the next version did run everything in UTC, thank goodness, but not after a few years of pointless, stupid, dumb pages.

    Finally, there was the 2005 or so "energy savings" act, when they changed when the time wobble happened, and then everyone was spelunking around all the codebases, finding out how many custom date-time libraries had crawled into the systems (hint: lots) that all then needed updating. Maybe they found 'em all? Who knows, some reports might still be off by an hour, sometimes. Worst was the Exchange system, good fun post-change as they eventually threw up their hands and said "here's your new, empty calendar, good luck" and then 10,000+ folks were scavenging through old email invites to try to figure out who had been going to what meeting that was no longer there.

    Probably seemed a good idea at the time. Isn't.

  200. It's STUPID by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    But even stupider would be to stick to your guns while the rest of the country did it.

    If I got to be Benevolent Dictator for a Day, I'd split the difference and move Standard Time in the US ahead 1/2 hour and leave it.

  201. Have Everyone use UTC by nitro-57 · · Score: 1

    Just use global time (UTC) and set your schedules based on that. Does it reallt matter if lunch is at 12:00 noon or 07:00?

  202. The right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The root cause here is that the length of the day, and the relative start and end times, shift over the course of the year. Instead of working around that, we should address it directly.

    We need to get some research money devoted to the stabilization of the Earth's orbit, so that the days are uniform all year round.

    The orbit is fine, just need to shift the rotational axis 23 degrees

    While we are at it, we can slow the orbit down just a hair and get rid of leap year.

    I think it would be more appropriate to speed the earth's orbit, otherwise that is just making more problems having to change every reference to 366 (and honestly who want's to have to by a new version off office because Office 365 stops working one day a year)
    actually let's speed the orbit up so we can drop those extra 5 days and make the year a nice round 360 days over 12 30-day months

  203. "Nightlife Savings Time" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I would love to see the opposite, there is way too much daylight in the summer, but very little night sky for someone trapped in first shift like I. In the winter it would be nice to have at least an hour of sunlight when you get home for snowblowing.

    Hear hear! In the summer we have more light and less darkness, so why do things to make awake-while-dark time even more scarce? (How much of the demise of drive-in theatres can be laid at the feet of the government-mandated imposition, and increases in the period of, Daylight Savings Time?)

    I have for years been proposing Nightlife Savings Time as a fix: If the government MUST muck with the clocks, set them BACK in the spring, so those of us who want some dark time don't have to wait until the ground is covered with snow to get it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  204. Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should stop switching and keep one time only.

  205. For It: All year DST by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    All year DST is preferred from my end, but it would at least help to switch DST at the same dates like the rest of the world.

  206. Against! Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the whole world should switch immediately to UTC. People say they wouldn't be able to get used to waking up at 1400, but it won't be long before they realize that it's just a number.

  207. 18 "clocks" by DERoss · · Score: 1

    Counting not only obvious clocks but also the timers on our thermostat, garden irrigation system, blood glucose meter (I have type 2 diabetes), TV and DVD/VCR (which have separate "clocks"), the gas and microwave ovens, and controller for lights on front walkway, I had to reset 18 timing devices this morning.

    But this is not merely a twice-a-year effort. Failing to do proper preventative maintenance on its system, Southern California Edison can have an electrical outage at any time of the year; weather is rarely a factor. Every time there is an outage, I have to reset 7 devices and check three more to make sure their internal battery backups did not fail. Then there is the tall-case clock (also known as a grandfather's clock); if I forget to wind it before it runs down, I must then reset it. And there are two battery-driven clocks that occasionally need new batteries.

  208. How about a SLASHDOT SURVEY? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Why is this an "ask slashdot" rather than a "slashdot survey"?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  209. I hate DST, Airizona has the right idea!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST is a abomination and should be killed dead along with the ones
    that support it

    11

  210. Extra time for Halloween parties by decibel.places · · Score: 1

    In the 1980s I hosted a huge Halloween party every year on the Saturday when DST started. I met my late wife at one of my parties. Around midnight, we would set back the clocks one hour. People stayed later and enjoyed the party longer.

  211. Against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It speaks to the hubris of a government which would like to control even the position of the sun in the sky.

  212. Against it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Indiana didn't change for the longest time, wasn't that bad without it. The issue came up when Indiana decided to join the greater majority of the country to observe it and then some brainless twit gave Indiana the option of what Time Zone they wanted to be in instead of allowing the Time Zone to be set by GEOGRAPHY as every other state does, so not only do we have DST we are now the only Centrally located State to be in the Eastern Time Zone. What does it matter you may ask? Children waiting on the schoolbus in the dark before the sun actually rises, not to mention quite a number of school starting time delays because of weather events that wouldn't be much a problem after the sunrise.....

  213. Split the difference by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Why not meet in the middle - 30 minutes permanently.

    Does 30 minutes really make a difference?

  214. Only possible justification by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    The only possible justification for DST in modern times might be it being more convenient/safer for grade/middle/high school students to get to school in the morning. But at a cost likely in the hundreds of millions of dollars to prevent a few additional injuries & an occasional death or two there are FAR more worthwhile places where we cold be expending the resources (extra curricular activities, improved nutrition, etc) to do much more good.

  215. We need it in the North by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people against DST are probably from the south, where it doesn't matter. The further north you live, the longer the day is in the summer. I would rather have the standard day shifted earlier, so I can use the rest of the daylight after work. (This is why they call it Daylight Savings Time.) In the summer, the evening stays light until 9:00pm. In the winter, even with the day shifted to the middle of the lighted part, I'm driving home at 5:00pm in the near dark. Notherners get so little warm weather. Let us enjoy what we can.

    The reason it needs to be a standard is so the stores and other places of business are all on the same clock. We want everyone synchronized so the public transportation doesn't have to run at half capacity for a longer commute period. It saves having to keep a list of which businesses are open late, and which let their employees out early. Imagine driving a delivery route where you have to run it twice, once for each set of early or late customers. If you get it wrong, there is no one there to take the delivery.

    The further south you go, the less the length of the day varies, and the less you need DST Y'all need to shut up, 'cuz y'all can go outside in February. Arizona decided not to participate in DST. Lobby in your state, if that's what you want. Leave those of us who benefit from it alone.

  216. The Old Indian Said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Old Indian, when Daylight Savings Time was explained to him, said:

    "Only a White Man could believe that cutting a foot off the top of the blanket and sewing it on the bottom would make the blanket longer."

  217. Against DST by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    No stinking DST. I have lived 38 years w/o DST, 33 years years with. I like daylight when I wake up, which I don't have in Mar, April, and Sep, Oct. I like to sit on my deck, listen to the cicadas while it is dark. In Jun, Jul, and part of Aug it isn't dark until well after 9. The country tried all year DST in the 70s, it was a disaster, and was stopped. One argument put forth to have DST was energy savings, but several studies have shown this to not be fact, in fact, oil consumption rises due to people driving more with the extended evening daylight.

  218. Against DST by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    We will continue to have DST, because 98%+ of the population has not known anything other than DST, and think it is a good thing.

  219. Against it! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    It is a royal pain in the arse. I prefer recognizing the seasons, rather than trying to hide them. It also mucks with our normal sleep pattern during the switch over.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  220. Embedded systems and DST schedules changed by fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The timezone schedules are contain countries that that are off by non-hour increments (ie: India), and not everybody switches at the same time if they observe a DST switch. When governments simply decree a new DST start time, you then can't tell time with a computer without knowing timezone and schedule. I was up in the air on an international flight during one such newly decreed DST changes, and we got an announcement that something went wrong and lunch was an hour late. A lot of embedded systems (ie: watches, car, plane parts) are not updateable. You have the schedule in the OS, and the schedule in the runtime system (ie: Java), etc. Did I mention leap seconds? Ideally, DST would be eliminated. But perhaps we should just stop messing with it. There are some computer systems, using algorithms involving truncating 'today' to midnight milliseconds, that are very sensitive to situations where the timezone schedules are not exactly aligned (ie: between OS, PHP, database, application code that assumes that days are 24hrs in length, or some integral number of hours in length).

  221. Where do I stand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the dark...

  222. every fucking year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every fucking year slashdot, every fuuuuuucking year. sort it out jesus fucking christ.

  223. FOR the time switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like switching to have more early morning light in the fall (and, back to DST in the spring).

    However, I wish we could go back to the times when it used to be - two weeks earlier in the fall, and two weeks later in the spring. My mornings are *really* dark for the last two weeks of October. Having light in the morning makes it *much* easier to get up. I'm more productive when it's light in the mornings, get more done. So my personal contribution to the GDP will be higher... :-)

  224. F**k Standard time by Robertwc · · Score: 1

    I want DST year round. I like daylight when I get off of work. DST year round all the way!

    --
    If Bill Gates had a nickle for every time windoz crashed he would be rich. Wait a second he does.
  225. Let's just use UTC everywhere by GnuPooh · · Score: 1

    The time you go to work, or go home is just a number. I've been a pilot for years and it's very easy to switch to knowing I wake up at 1200 UTC and I usually get home from work about 0000 UTC. What's difficult is all this messing with the clock. If you call a company on the other side of the country, imagine how much easier it would be if they just could give you the UTC time you're use to thinking in terms of for their hours of operations? It really just works, everyone has to just let go of the idea that work starts at 9AM and ends at 5PM. The time your work starts and ends should be a function of where you live around the globe (and perhaps if you work night shift).

  226. Fuck the Peasants, right mate? by johncandale · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, your servants at the shops should work silly hours to please master. No sense in letting them go home to their families at the same time, or enjoy culture. Thoughts like yours is why the US has such a fractured broken culture. It sounds great to me the shops are closed Sundays, and everyone is off at the same time.

    1. Re:Fuck the Peasants, right mate? by lifeisshort · · Score: 1

      But you still enjoy having electricity and/or internet during the weekend, right?

  227. global world is overrated anyways by johncandale · · Score: 1

    Just a aside here. It's just an excuse to "use a expert in Europe" and "a consultant in India" to save a few pounds in the latter and not train and invest at home in anyone long term in the former. No one has a sense of community. And is adding to the pollution with all the air travel. Not just the business flights but the people who move about chasing jobs then have to fly all over to visit family "back home". I am not even for long commutes. People should train or bike to work. The Boeing 707 really wreaked havoc with England's districts. I know it seems silly to be against technology on a technology web site but there you go.

  228. Moving... by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Moving back to Arizona I am...

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  229. Here in China... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

    In China, there is one single time zone (Beijing Time, UTC+8), and there is no daylight savings time. This means that for all of China, throughout the entire year, everyone is on the same time and never has to monkey around with adjusting the time. Coming from the U.S. where we have multiple time zones plus daylight savings time, I feel like the simplicity of time here in China is a nice little luxury. The only time I ever have to worry about time changes or time zones are when I'm contacting people in foreign countries.

    For the extreme west, Tibet and Xinjiang, there is an unofficial time zone (UTC+6), but this is just a common local practice, and Beijing Time is always the official time. During the Republic era, China actually had 5 time zones, but they learned their lesson and realized simplicity is a virtue.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  230. Just shut the fuck up about it Slashdot by aybiss · · Score: 1

    Are you a guy who is lifting bricks into place to make a building when the sun comes up in summer and makes you too hot to continue?

    Are you there milking the cows to get us some milk when the sun _doesn't_ come up in winter and it's so freezing you can't move your fingers?

    Nobody gives a fuck what _you_ think about what time it is, office boy, and after reading these all comments, I thank fuck for that.

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  231. Ben Franklin or War Hysteria-Time to End It. by Jerome+from+Layton · · Score: 1

    Ben Franklin was the first person that I know who suggested it as a way to add daylight hours at the end of the day. Then, the idea remained dormant until The First World War when it was adopted by both sides to increase production and save illumination fuel. One origin of the term "Wartime". It kicked in again for WW-II, of course. Then, somebody added two months to it during the "Energy Crises" in the mid-Seventies which had mothers escorting their children to the school bus with flashlights due to the darkness. Crazy! When I was flying, it didn't matter because my watch was set to Zulu and never changed. So far, three places don't buy into this foolishness. NE Indiana, Arizona, and Hawaii. The idea of dropping it like yesterday's garbage has been proposed in Utah which would align us with Arizona. Time to call my legislators and do some suggesting.

  232. No DST means no raiding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Queensland Australia, we do not have daylight savings. WOW servers run on Sydney NSW time, so when DST comes along raids start an hour earlier. I cannot start an hour earlier, wife, kids etc. An 8pm raid would be starting during dinner time causing much aggro - I am not a tank and that time of the night I am in cloth and very few self heals so chances of survival are not that great. My one or if I am lucky two raiding nights has more or less gone down to zero.... so now compared to all the other elite ( just ask them ) WOW players I am relegated to disdain and contempt by these same elite players. So I am hugely in favour of Daylight Savings, I would vote for any government that would bring this in no matter what their other policies.

  233. Whitehouse petition to end DST by wad4ever · · Score: 1

    I'm against it. That's why I made a petition to end it. If you want more daylight in the evening, you don't need to change everyone's clocks! Just get up earlier, and come home from work or whatever earlier.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.g...

    --
    --- wad
  234. Against it! It does the opposite of its purpose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stated purpose is to conserve energy, but the numbers show that it has the opposite effect.

    For an apples-to-apples comparison, look at Indiana when they were a partially "fast time" and partially "slow time" state. Then look at them after they became an entirely "fast time" state.

    Summer energy usage in the regions that had formerly been ignoring DST saw a dramatic increase after converting to DST. The regions which had already been observing DST did not see a similar year-over-year increase in the same time period.

    This, coupled with the 48-hour spike in heart attacks and traffic accidents after shifting the clock forward, is just stupidity.

    Stop screwing with the clocks.

  235. Leave it like it was! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who escaped from a mental institution so many years ago, and made up DST stuff.

  236. Hated it since childhood by weweedmaniii · · Score: 1

    My fiance is currently living in the Netherlands and they switched off of CEDST last weekend, and here in the US we just switched from EDST. I have few problems mentally calculating time differences as I had to do it constantly when I was assigned to Korea in the military in the medical field...watching the docs come in in the middle of the night for a mandatory conference call with the CDC (we used experimental STD drugs) or with Medical Command HQ (in San Antonio TX) was fun. They had no clue what time their meetings were, so we had to learn quickly as our command and South Korea did not observe DST. My fiance still has trouble with the time shift, so she will tell me "call me at X" knowing I can figure this out. I will be glad when her visa goes through so I don't have to timeshift for a chance to Skype with her and the 4 times a year I have to recalculate for a week or two our time difference.

    --
    "If stupid things work...then they are not stupid."
  237. Against it! by mjgday · · Score: 1

    It is midday when the sun is dierectly overhead. We conventionally call this 12:00. Likewise at 00:00 the sun should be directly below our feet.

    Before the invention of rapid transport, the train, every town run on local meridiam time so there was a 10 minute difference in time between Bristol and London http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/info/bristol-time.htm this caused significant problem with train timetabling. However that's just lazyness in my mind, there's no reason we can't have meridiam time everywhere and watches with gps to compenstate as we move east and west.

    Even if we stick with Timezones, there's no reason to budge things by an hour ever. If people want to get up an hour earlier for some part of the year, they're welcome too, just leave me in bed!

    --
    foo
  238. Just to make DST more screwy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST itself is bad enough, but the geniuses in the US congress and Canadian parliaments also changed the start/stop dates a few years ago so that the North American DST schedule is different from just about everywhere else in the world. So now the time offset between, say, San Francisco and, say, Berlin, might be 8, 9 or 10 hours depending on what month it is and which city is or is not on a "summer" timezone. For people in the US who do business with the many countries in the world that are not the US, this is an added insult beyond that standardized absurdity.

  239. Living in Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, we don't do that shit.

  240. Against it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a gimmick, and it fails just messes things up.

    Want to have more time after work/school? Then go to work earlier and leave earlier. Nuff said.

  241. Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up on a farm and changing time was disruptive. The animals have their own clocks - so chores done at 5:00 am had to be done at 4:00 am & vice versa.Of course, most people are urban dwellers nowadays, so farmers don't have much of a voice. Changes in time also affect kids - especially when you have to get them up early as most people do. It can really be a challenge getting a kids internal clock to go with the plan. Finally I always have a week or two of "jet lag" after the time change - so don't think its good for me.

  242. DST all the time please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we have only about 4 months of standard time now, it seems a pretty good indication that while there are lots of points of view, most people are pretty happy with DST. The reason is pretty simple. The vast majority of people are fully awake and busy in the evening and so can use the extra daylight, while comparatively fewer are up and at 'em before 6 or 7 am. And at any rate, you're either driving in the dark in the morning, or driving home in the dark at night. . . so that zero sum tradeoff is worth the hassle of everyone changing their clocks? No.

    And yeah, it seems a lot more reasonable to encourage those people and organizations to shift between winter and summer business hours if that ends up suiting them, rather than make every last one of us shift their entire lives. I think it would end up being relatively few that would end up shifting.

  243. Make it year round! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its nice in the UK to have the extra evening hour of daylight. However, in the winter people would end up whining around saying that it was too dark in the morning and they cant get up. But overall it would be a change for the better.

    A big problem is that the UK has Greenwich, as in Greenwich mean time. It would no longer be very relevant if we permanently moved to being an hour ahead of GMT.

  244. Against it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, the noon is the middle of the day. So don't fuck about with it.

    Second, the whiners complaining "The evenings are so short" are fucking hopelessly lost. The problem IS NOT that the nights draw in early, but that the working day STOPS TOO LATE.

    Middle of the day; 12 Noon
    Middle of the working day (9-5) 1 O'clock IN THE AFTER NOON

    If your working day is mostly in the afternoon, and you want more light after work, THEN GET THE WORKING DAY CHANGED. DON'T shift the clock about just so you keep the 9-5 clock hour.

  245. THEY ALREADY DO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST means that businesses ALREADY DO have winter hours. They just make the clock lie rather than have their opening times change, but no matter how it's done, THEY HAVE CHANGED THEIR OPENING HOURS.

  246. Does anyone actually like it? by neminem · · Score: 1

    I haven't met anyone who does. All the conversations I've had about it over the years, there seem to be two major camps:

    1. It's awful and I really wish we could abolish it. (I fall into that one.)
    2. Meh, whatever, it's not that big a deal.

    So if half the population hates it, and the other half doesn't care one way or another... why is it still a thing? (Honestly, I'm asking, I have no idea.)

  247. Standard Time by OpiumEd · · Score: 1

    If people like an extra hour of daylight after work, then why not start work an extra hour early and get off an extra hour early? Then in the evening instead of being asleep by 10pm, why not be asleep by 9pm instead? Or even 8pm? See.... many Americans can't do it. There's no concept of "delayed gratification" for most people. So, "Daylight Savings Time" was created to force people to get up an hour early and sleep an hour early, for what used to be 6 months out of the year. Now the powers-that-be have increased it to - what - 8 months?