Slashdot Mirror


Chris Christie Proposes Tracking Immigrants the Way FedEx Tracks Packages

PolygamousRanchKid submits the news that New Jersey governor (and Republican presidential candidate) Chris Christie said yesterday that he would, if elected president, create a system to track foreign visitors the way FedEx tracks packages. The NYT writes: Mr. Christie, who is far back in the pack of candidates for the Republican presidential nomination, said at a campaign event in New Hampshire that he would ask the chief executive of FedEx, Frederick W. Smith, to devise the tracking system."At any moment, FedEx can tell you where that package is. It's on the truck. It's at the station. It's on the airplane," Mr. Christie told the crowd in Laconia, N.H. "Yet we let people come to this country with visas, and the minute they come in, we lose track of them." He added: "We need to have a system that tracks you from the moment you come in." Adds the submitter: "I'm sure foreign tourist will be amused when getting a bar code sticker slapped on their arm."

335 of 576 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, nah. by YukariHirai · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm somewhat interested in visiting the US, but this kind of bullshit would absolutely kill any desire to go there.

    1. Re:Yeah, nah. by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm somewhat interested in visiting the US, but this kind of bullshit would absolutely kill any desire to go there.

      It took this? Not our general policy of running around the world tampering with governments, murdering people, and blowing up cities for profit?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a very effective way to get rid of those pesky foreigners then! Probably exactly what they want.

    3. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone who still visits the US after the iris/fingerprinting/laptop-snooping/body-scanning/anal-reaming bullshit is already an embarrassment to humanity.

      At least a barcode slapped visibly to one's forehead would be an honest expression of what's going on, and frankly I'd rather that than all of the above.

    4. Re: Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a barcode, it's a Star of David and it must always remain visible

    5. Re: Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Going to the US soon - unavoidable business trip - I will grow my hair longer now to cover my forehead. I will look like a bomber, but at least the tag won't be visible.

    6. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In general the world is probably a safer place thanks to the US.

    7. Re:Yeah, nah. by stooo · · Score: 2

      Why not a nice tattoo like this one : http://wpmedia.o.canada.com/20...

      --
      aaaaaaa
    8. Re:Yeah, nah. by kyrsjo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if we may be skeptical to or disagree with US policy, it doesn't mean that we dislike everyone who lives there or what is there.

    9. Re:Yeah, nah. by niftydude · · Score: 2

      I can see it now. Ivy league university hires world class researcher, who has to get tagged with an RFID as if they were cattle to be allowed to work in the US.

      Similar for other professions: medical, engineering, etc.

      This will work so well. Christie and his entourage must be completely incapable of critical thought to consider this idea for more that 10 seconds. A proposal like this would destroy the ability of the US to maintain world class leadership of anything.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    10. Re:Yeah, nah. by YukariHirai · · Score: 3, Informative

      It took this? Not our general policy of running around the world tampering with governments, murdering people, and blowing up cities for profit?

      Those did kill it most of the way, and the "somewhat interested" is conditional on some pretty unlikely things, such as someone else footing the bill for the trip.

    11. Re:Yeah, nah. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      It's not the tag that will humiliate you. It's the method of implantation.

      "Remove your clothing, face that wall, put both hands up on the wall, put your feet back so that you're leaning against the wall."

      ZIIIP!

      Placing the chip on the head of his penis, the inquisitor approaches you.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:Yeah, nah. by niftydude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On second thought, as long as they do this to all our politicians when they visit the US, I might be OK with it....

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    13. Re: Yeah, nah. by Xicor · · Score: 1

      pretty sure he doesnt care about people coming to visit... pretty sure he only cares about those with visas. dumb as shit idea, but it certainly wouldnt affect anyone who isnt planning on immigrating here.

    14. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It took this? Not our general policy of running around the world tampering with governments, murdering people, and blowing up cities for profit?

      Those policies mostly harm people not in the US, and so wouldn't provide a reason to not visit the US. (They might, in fact, be a reason to visit the US - you are less likely to get blown up or murdered by the government while in the US than elsewhere.)

    15. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless you're in one of the many countries we invaded because we didn't like your government and/or wanted your resources.

    16. Re:Yeah, nah. by c4757p · · Score: 1

      Of just talking about the group who do agree...

    17. Re: Yeah, nah. by raind2 · · Score: 1

      Right below story there's the ad: "now hiring border control agents". How fitting.

    18. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Of course, without details, people can make this out to be anything they want without being reasonable. Its not necessarily tracking tourists as it is specific to those with visas. It seems to be a way for those with visas to check in on occasion, and could be nothing more than that.

    19. Re:Yeah, nah. by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry.Visit the US, if you can tolerate the airport bullshit. Christie has little to no chance of winning unless he knocks off all the competitors. Even then, he still might lose. He's not appealing to the US mainstream crowd.

    20. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can see it now. Ivy league university hires world class researcher, who has to get tagged with an RFID as if they were cattle to be allowed to work in the US.

      And where specifically did you read that people will be tagged with an RFID? They could simply carry an ID card. A perfectly reasonable requirement. They could check in once in a while. Another perfectly reasonable requirement.

      Many here are making up unreasonable scenarios then arguing how stupid they are.

    21. Re:Yeah, nah. by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      In general I have a lot of issues with the policies of the US government. But neither the US government or the people living in the country are my enemies. And I am planning on visiting in the near future. Unless this kind of crap goes through - I mean, I can avoid bringing laptops or tables to the US, but my body is pretty hard to leave at home.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    22. Re:Yeah, nah. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Christie and his entourage must be completely incapable of critical thought to consider this idea for more that 10 seconds.

      I think you are beginning to understand the nature of the problem.

    23. Re:Yeah, nah. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Oh well then, just drop in to your nearest police station or FBI department every morning during your stay to say howdy. Nothing wrong with that.

    24. Re:Yeah, nah. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're not busy tampering with my country, [...] I don't give a shit about bumfuckistan, so I will still visit so long as you don't fuck with me or my people personally.

      This is why we can't have nice things. Well, actually, it's why we can have nice things while other people have to be collected from all over the room and loaded into buckets for disposal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re: Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, many.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_military_operations

    26. Re:Yeah, nah. by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      Maybe Vanuatu? It's only truly small countries that are isolated that can fit that set of criteria because they aren't big enough for anyone else to meddle and there isn't much for the people in the country to fight over.

    27. Re: Yeah, nah. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Visitors overstay their visas all the time so that'll be the next proposal.

    28. Re:Yeah, nah. by chipschap · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why are people taking this raving by a candidate with not much chance of getting elected so seriously? Does anyone here really believe visitors are going to get imprinted with a bar code --- which is not even what Christie said?

      If the US is so bad that you don't want to visit, go visit someplace nice, with a better attitude ... you know, like North Korea or Iran.

    29. Re:Yeah, nah. by chipschap · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh well then, just drop in to your nearest police station or FBI department every morning during your stay to say howdy. Nothing wrong with that.

      The equivalent took place in former communist countries. I remember visiting the DDR (East Germany) and having to turn in my passport every night. Get a little perspective here, please.

    30. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Why once a day, why FBI department? How about once every two months, and at a convenient location like a post office? Swipe your card and go home.

    31. Re: Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      That depends on what you define as regularly. Once every two months maybe? Or check in in advance and let them know.

    32. Re: Yeah, nah. by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      You are of the opinion people who come visit do not need visas? There's a number of countries that don't need it for short term, but if you stay longer than X days, you'll always need a visa. And most citizens of other countries do need a visa.

    33. Re:Yeah, nah. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      [T]he "somewhat interested" is conditional on some pretty unlikely things, such as someone else footing the bill for the trip.

      Meaning an American girl with frequent-flyer miles to spare?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    34. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      you are less likely to get blown up or murdered by the government while in the US than elsewhere.

      FEDERAL government [will be less likely to kill you if you are in the US]. In the US, the municipal governments kill with (relative) impunity. Have you not seen the stories of the unarmed people killed by police?

    35. Re:Yeah, nah. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      The anal probe was fine, but you draw the line at a permanent tattoo on the back of your head ala Hitman?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    36. Re:Yeah, nah. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      people on unemployment have to check in the unemployment office once a month in NY.

      would it be so bad to ask the same of visa holders???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    37. Re:Yeah, nah. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you dont wanna come to NY anyway. coming from a new yorker

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    38. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The last poll I saw had Donald at the top of the Republicans, and Hillary at the top of the Democrats, and Donald leading if there was a Trump-Clinton vote right now. So , based on the proxy polls discussing today's likely outcome, Trump is the front runner to be the next president. And this sounds like something Trump could get behind.

    39. Re: Yeah, nah. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of that list in the past couple of decades were training missions or disaster aid and other mundane things where we were actually invited in to help. There was some murder and mayhem of course since we are in a war with several terrorist organizations. I'm not a big fan of acting as the world's police force either, it's too damn expensive. Still, it's not near as bad as you make it seem.

    40. Re:Yeah, nah. by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a bar code. I think it's much more modern than that: an RFID chip. We use them over here for cats, dogs and cattle, so it's not like the equipment isn't already in place :)

      As for visiting states: I agree there is little chance of this going through in the form now mentioned. That doesn't mean that if you get enough people saying stuff like this, the other candidates won't feel forced to do something similar in vein.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    41. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What about if I visit? I have family there, and an currently investigating a position with a US company that would require infrequent travel to the US. But for me, and a few million others, we hold US passports while living permanently abroad. We get to visit without any of those security measures. No fingerprinting, no scans, no tagging. Just an entry in my permanent file that I was out, and am not not.

    42. Re:Yeah, nah. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Gee I didn't realize I needed to put in the /s

      But if he's worried about tracking immigrants then once every two months would probably be too far apart for him since that would let someone get quite a distance and settled in a new place during that time. You could get pretty far in a week. Guess it all depends on how paranoid he's being.

    43. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Guess it all depends on how paranoid he's being.

      Probably not as much as the reactionaries.

    44. Re:Yeah, nah. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      you are less likely to get blown up or murdered by the government while in the US than elsewhere.

      The US is the only western nation still executing people, on that score it's roughly on par with China. The US also locks up it's citizens at a higher rate than ANYWHERE else in the world, eg: ~7X the rate at which China imprisons people.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:Yeah, nah. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The fact that he is popular is disturbing.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    46. Re:Yeah, nah. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Oh well then, just drop in to your nearest police station or FBI department every morning during your stay to say howdy. Nothing wrong with that.

      The equivalent took place in former communist countries. I remember visiting the DDR (East Germany) and having to turn in my passport every night. Get a little perspective here, please.

      I know 3 people from the former DDR and I've never heard any of them refer to it as "the land of the free".

      A little perspective indeed sir.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    47. Re:Yeah, nah. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The equivalent took place in former communist countries.

      Get a little perspective here, please.

      I think you just gave me all the perspective I need about the USA.

    48. Re:Yeah, nah. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Nothing like intentionally missing the point. In the Communist countries, this actually happened. It has not in the US and is hardly likely.

    49. Re:Yeah, nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was just refused entry yesterday. In transit, they decided I needed a visa. In fucking transit between two airplanes?

      I had used the last of my financial reserves to buy a ticket to go home. Thanks to this BULLSHIT, I am now, today, in this very moment, stuck in a foreign continent. With no way out.

      Never, ever, will I visit for the rest of my life.

      This shit always hits "everyday people".

      Thanks USA, and fuck you.

      Pity, because most people I've met from there are nice enough.

    50. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It took this? Not our general policy of running around the world tampering with governments, murdering people, and blowing up cities for profit?

      Those did kill it most of the way, and the "somewhat interested" is conditional on some pretty unlikely things, such as someone else footing the bill for the trip.

      Could you explain what killing al Qaeda terrorists with drone strikes in Afghanistan has to do with visiting the US? Which cities do you think the US "blew up for profit"? You seem to be peddling nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    51. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat interested in visiting the US, but this kind of bullshit would absolutely kill any desire to go there.

      It took this? Not our general policy of running around the world tampering with governments, murdering people, and blowing up cities for profit?

      In 2012 there were approximately 67,000,000 foreign visitors to the US. It seems likely that they don't have the perspective of a self-hating American that twists issues to show the US as a rotten country, sometimes fabricating things in the process.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    52. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Local government "kill with (relative) impunity?" Rubbish. Absolute rubbish.

      If that was the case there wouldn't be multiple police officers currently facing trial in more than one city, and cities wouldn't care about lawsuits (which have cost some of them dearly).

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    53. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The people being collected from "all over the room and loaded into buckets for disposal" are being targeted because they want to commit terrorist attacks that will cause dozens or hundreds of other people to be "collected in buckets for disposal" for every attack they commit. Preventing them from attacking others reduces the number of buckets needed. Innocent people in village markets have a chance at having nice things since they are less likely to be attacked by terrorists. Why do you oppose protecting the innocent?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    54. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      cities wouldn't care about lawsuits (which have cost some of them dearly).

      Where do the cities get the money from to pay for the lawsuits? Seems most of the politicians and police higher-ups don't care too much about losing lawsuits (at least not from the cost standpoint).

    55. Re:Yeah, nah. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      And where specifically did you read that people will be tagged with an RFID? They could simply carry an ID card. A perfectly reasonable requirement. They could check in once in a while. Another perfectly reasonable requirement.

      The fact that you think this is a reasonable requirement is scary. So much for land of the free eh?

    56. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that? Money lost in damages comes from taxes which mean taxes go up. That means both unhappy voters and less money for city government. That is before you get to the question of a judge overseeing operations of a city and its police force, which is both humiliating and unpleasant for all involved. There is also the question of state involvement: investigations, oversight, prosecution.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    57. Re:Yeah, nah. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In 2012 there were approximately 67,000,000 foreign visitors to the US.

      Suckers.

      It seems likely that they don't have the perspective of a self-hating American that twists issues to show the US as a rotten country, sometimes fabricating things in the process.

      I don't hate me, I hate you and your ilk that pretend that our country is not doing evil in our name, because you make it possible for them to do that. I guess you forgot about Dick Cheney lying about WMDs so that we could go bomb some cities and then give the no-bid contracts to rebuild them to Halliburton, eh? How quickly you forget, because it's so very fucking convenient for you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    58. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Because, nice as the US is, has a reputation of harassing ex-citizens. Going back to visit relatives gets you on lots of lists that need inspections, searches, and lots of questions.

      I think the un-Fair Tax is evil, but if it ever passes, it'll simplify my tax liability greatly. I think the only country in the world that taxes non-resident citizens is the US.

    59. Re:Yeah, nah. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that?

      What, that politicians are happy to pass on their problems to the next administration? Yes, I really think that.

    60. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      And that means you think politicians are happy to lose elections. Right . . .

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    61. Re:Yeah, nah. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure people in communist countries thought so too.

    62. Re:Yeah, nah. by niftydude · · Score: 1

      And where specifically did you read that people will be tagged with an RFID? They could simply carry an ID card. A perfectly reasonable requirement. They could check in once in a while. Another perfectly reasonable requirement. Many here are making up unreasonable scenarios then arguing how stupid they are.

      Of course. A visa over stayer will definitely check in once in a while - they didn't mean to over stay, and of course they will go to the check in point as legally required. A perfectly reasonable requirement which will have absolutely zero effect since the only people who check in are the people who are law abiding and were going to leave on time anyway. But it will create jobs for all the people needed to man the check points, Chris Christie's mates will get nice fat contracts to run the whole shebang, therefore the economy will be stimulated, and the only people that will be worse off will be legal immigrants and american taxpayers.

      The only way to do this in a manner which will actually catch illegals is to tag all immigrants with an ankle bracelet or similar when they arrive - hence my initial comment. Christie's suggestion is less than a thought bubble, it is so lacking in content that it should never have been spoken.

      Yet here you are defending the idea, and modded informative non the less. Maybe people do get the government they deserve.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    63. Re: Yeah, nah. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      And people who don't need a visa need this funny thing called a "visa waiver".

      Which is just a visa by another name.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    64. Re:Yeah, nah. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Baghdad for example. And Haliburton made a handsome profit from Iraq war.
      By the way, bombing a city with a shock and awe doctrine makes you the actual terrorists by the definition of that word.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    65. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      What is unreasonable, carrying and ID card when you are on a visa? Most people carry ID cards anyhow. Checking in once a month when on a Visa? I would happily do so visiting another country, and I can't think of a single freedom that is taken away from me. I am certainly free to leave.

    66. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised how helpful it would be to know the most recent area a person stayed, to remind them before their visa expires what their options are, and to know within a month that a person that should have checked out of the country did not do so. Just because it does not solve the problem entirely doesn't mean it is not useful.

      Your assumption about ankle bracelets is quite ridiculous. If you want to get modded informative, don't make shit up that isn't reasonable. I understand you don't like Christie, I'm not a big fan but at least I don't have to resort to hyperbole to justify my opinions.

    67. Re:Yeah, nah. by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Why are people taking this raving by a candidate with not much chance of getting elected so seriously?

      In fact it tells a lot about the society where a candidate may hope to get votes with such ravings.

      --
      bickerdyke
    68. Re:Yeah, nah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Targets in Baghdad were bombed, Baghdad as a whole wasn't. The US didn't profit from bombing Baghdad, so that is nonsense. Citing Haliburton doesn't make the case stronger.

      You are peddling nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    69. Re: Yeah, nah. by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Not quite. They need an ESTA registration instead of a visa. "Visa Waiver" is the name of the program that allowed citizens of certain countries to visit the US without a visa (usually bilateral) and has been around much longer than the ESTA stuff.

      What your ESTA registration acutally replaces is that white I-94 form that you have to fill out while on the airplane. So the border and costums patrol knows that you're not planning to visit the states with criminal intent 72 hours before you're boarding the plane compared to checking that nonsensical form at your destination airport.

      I still suspect the whole idea of that is that after years into the visa waiver program, some bean counter noticed that by that program, the US is also waiving billions of visa fees and the found a way to have tourists pay an admission fee even if they don't need a visa. All under the guise of "modernizing" beurocrazy and moving paperwork that used to be ignored for free to a electronic system that earns them $14 per tourist.

      --
      bickerdyke
    70. Re:Yeah, nah. by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Ever checked into a hotel in modern days Germany? Hotels are still required to note your home address and passport number (for tourists).

      --
      bickerdyke
    71. Re:Yeah, nah. by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      That may be reasonable, but is NOT how FedEx-style tracking works. And that, and not something reasonable, was the key point.

      --
      bickerdyke
    72. Re:Yeah, nah. by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      >>Targets in Baghdad were bombed, Baghdad as a whole wasn't.
      Would you have wanted to be anywhere in Baghdad during that?

      >> Citing Haliburton doesn't make the case stronger.
      You seem to be ignoring all the close ties Haliburton has with government officials esepecially including vice president at the time.. Dick Cheney. The war in Iraq made a lot of money for many government officials. Corruption and greed are a far more likely explanation for that war than the extremely dubious looking inteligence regarding WMDs that were cited.

    73. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you interpose the entire Fedex package tracking approach, you'd have to put them on conveyor belts and run them through distribution facilities. Or, you could just mean the underlying logistics. In reality, it doesn't take anything as sophisticated as what FedEx does.

    74. Re:Yeah, nah. by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Well, if you interpose the entire Fedex package tracking approach, you'd have to put them on conveyor belts and run them through distribution facilities.

      Well, you know, I'm from an area where exactly that has already been done some 70 years ago, and it didn't turn out to be very popular. So you can't exactly rely on that comparing people to a piece of freight is only rhetorical hyperbole. It has been done before.

      --
      bickerdyke
    75. Re:Yeah, nah. by niftydude · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised how helpful it would be to know the most recent area a person stayed, to remind them before their visa expires what their options are, and to know within a month that a person that should have checked out of the country did not do so.

      You are correct - I would be surprised. The most recent area is pointless in a country where you can catch a bus or train from one side to another in a few days. Reminding them their visa is about to expire can be done using the email address/contact details that all US visitors have to provide when they get their ESTA or visa in order to be allowed entry to the country. Knowing to the day that a person that should have checked out of the country and did not do so is already recorded trivially at passport control. None of these tasks require the multimillion dollar cost of setting up and manning checkpoint offices across the country.

      Your assumption about ankle bracelets is quite ridiculous. If you want to get modded informative, don't make shit up that isn't reasonable. I understand you don't like Christie, I'm not a big fan but at least I don't have to resort to hyperbole to justify my opinions.

      On the contrary, my opinion is that ankle bracelets are pretty much the only reasonable way to make a scheme like this work. The self-driven check-in option you've proposed is just a huge waste of money with no useful outcomes (as I said before - probably just a boondoggle to enrich Christie's campaign donors). I don't follow US politics closely enough to like or dislike Christie or even know who he is, as my country has enough political problems to fill my news feed. I'm just pointing this particular idea out for the BS that it is.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    76. Re:Yeah, nah. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The US is not homogeneous. Yes, some cities like Seattle are doing pretty well in reining in their cops and prosecuting them for misconduct. Other places aren't. Seattle (and the entire PacNW) is **not** representative of the US as a whole, it's really quite different. It bears almost no resemblance to, say, Alabama or South Carolina, except that the same language (more or less) is spoken.

    77. Re:Yeah, nah. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How many politicians at the local level do those jobs for their entire working careers? I certainly don't see that much; they act as Mayor for a few years, maybe a decade at the very most, then they're replaced by someone else.

    78. Re:Yeah, nah. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      RFID chips won't work. RFID chips don't have very good range, and they're easily blocked by aluminum foil. RFID is great for something like keeping track of warehouse goods or shipped packages, where the thing being scanned is inanimate, and the person scanning can see (or know) where the RFID chip is and just scan it, and there's no active attempts to prevent this. They don't work if you want to implant a chip in someone and then be able to track them as they walk around; it's not hard for them to put some metallic material over the chip. If *everyone* has the implant, they of course you can look to see if someone went through a scanner without the RFID being read, and nab him; but if only a subset of the people have them (i.e. citizens) and you're trying to use it to track the "undesirables" or lesser-privileged people, it won't work because they can easily make themselves look like citizens by shielding the RFID chip.

      This is why secure facilities like military bases work with ID badges for privileged people: people who have access get a special pass they have to show. People without access don't get a pass. It wouldn't work the other way around, where unauthorized people have to carry a pass or declare that they're not supposed to be there, because you can't rely on honesty.

    79. Re:Yeah, nah. by siliconsmiley · · Score: 1

      With statements like this, Christie ensures that he will never be our president. While there are certainly those who think reducing human life to an RFID is a good idea, the majority of Americans do not.

    80. Re:Yeah, nah. by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Well, no, because people in other countries know the U.S. does that stuff mostly for fun. Now it's getting real.

    81. Re:Yeah, nah. by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Exactly -- immigrants will more than likely get tossed into a truck, then end up at a doorstep or loading dock fairly quickly, with a couple corners bent and at least a few smears of dirt on them, and in very rare cases, with some minor water damage

    82. Re: Yeah, nah. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Did you know Hsliburton found the Middle East conflicts so profitable that they tried to sell the division that serves those wartime contracts but... Wait for it... No one wanted it. Why?

      Because there was too little profit in it.

      And why did Haliburton's bids have no competitors? Because no one else could do the job Haliburton did.

      --
      Ken
    83. Re:Yeah, nah. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Yeah that works until one day when you check in and for some unknown reason you get detained. It happened to me in China, and took hours out of my day clearing things up while dudes with guns treated me like a criminal. That's not my definition of free.

    84. Re:Yeah, nah. by Gliscameria · · Score: 1

      Dont passports already have rfid?

      --
      X
    85. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      That can happen anywhere for many reasons, a completely false argument.

    86. Re:Yeah, nah. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I think many do, not sure if all do.

    87. Re:Yeah, nah. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Not in any country I've been, and I've been to quite a few. Generally the more despotic the regime, the more chance you have of detained or tracked for no reason, ie less freedom. In Western countries except the US, I feel like I can go anywhere and do anything I would normally do at home with fear of detainment.
      The US appears to be going down the path of the frog in the pot. 1 more degree warmer, it's still not a problem...

  2. Christie is ideal by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Christie would make the ideal VP for Trump. They're both ignorant bigots.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Christie is ideal by dinfinity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At first I thought that Trump was deliberately put into the picture to draw the playing field towards 'the right', i.e. make one guy say the most outlandish stuff so that the previously outlandish things the rest said actually seem reasonable (and conversely, making the actually reasonable stuff sound silly and far away from reality).

      But the completely baffling thing to me is that there are actually droves of people in the US that not only support Trump, but actively defend his words and say asinine shit like: "He's a true American. We need a guy like that for president" and: "The media are making him sound racist". I remember being very surprised that a moron like Bush Jr. could become (and stay!) president, but this is definitely a new low for the US. Trump hasn't been elected yet, but the fact that so many people like him and support him is already deeply, deeply disgraceful.

    2. Re:Christie is ideal by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From what I can see, it looks to me like Trump jumped in to do Hillary a favor by helping to deflect attention from Hillary's numerous felonies, and got way more attention than even he expected to get.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Christie is ideal by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He's a true American. We need a guy like that for president"

      Actually, that's not far from the truth. What's the other party running with, anyway? Traitorous scum of course. Clinton and Kerry both make a patriotic Trump look good in comparison. FFS, the left pampers and rewards outright terrorists with appointments as "professors". What sort of reaction do you EXPECT?!?!?!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Christie is ideal by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      This isn't illegal immigration he's talking about - it's legal, hence the visas.

    5. Re:Christie is ideal by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I would like to see is neither option.

      I want Visas available for all the jobs we need doing. Right now we can't get american's to pick food and until we have robots doing it we need people to do it. We should have a visa just for this purpose and have people get it legally. They should come here legally, work here legally and NOT be exploited by farmers, factories etc.

      On the other end we need to make it vastly simpler to bring in very highly skilled people from other countries. I am not talking about the H1-B crap that is abused and just for getting cheap programmers pretty much. I am talking about people with masters or PhDs from highly respected universities in biotech, nanotech, material science etc. People that we honestly don't have enough of and bringing the best over won't actually have any impact on americans being employed.

      There are some fields where that are only a few thousand qualified people on earth to do certain high tech jobs and we could employ ALL of them with barely a dent in the demand.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    6. Re:Christie is ideal by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trump's immigration "policies" get a lot of support because they basically mirror the same kind of simplistic truth people believe: Illegal immigrants have broken the law and should be deported, walling off the border between the US and Mexico will keep them out, lack of rigorous immigration enforcement enables illegal immigrant criminals to commit crime.

      It seems easy to me to understand why people so easily believe in these ideas, they have a kind of uncomplicated truth to them. If you are not residing or working in the US legally, why shouldn't you be deported? Certainly a large wall on the border would greatly hinder illegal imimgrants from infilitrating the border. We certainly don't want people with violent criminal histories entering the US, bypassing immigration allows these people to enter the US and potentially commit crime and deporting illegal immigrants before they commit crimes seems to have a certain preventative logic to it.

      Of course, none of these "positions" or "ideas" is more than surface deep. The basic logisticts of deporting all illegal immigrants is pretty crazy and lacks a certain humanity in many cases. It's debatable how effective some giant wall would be and who the hell would pay for it?

      None of it seems to address deeper questions of the problems of the current immigration system or why both political parties seem willfully unable to address it, or the value their constituences see in the current system, from cheap, wage-suppressed labor or for political pandering to immigrant groups to expansion of presumably political friendly constituencies.

      And all of them avoid the kind of hard debates on well, who should be allowed to assume residency and work in the US? Is someone going to actually step up to the plate and argue for an open borders policy in an honest an direct manner (it would appear that Trump is the advocate for the opposite policy)? If it's not open borders, then how, exactly will we regulate and enforce an immigration policy in a way that's consistent and achieves desirable goals?

      What's always surprised me is the lack of African American voices in the immigration debate. They have the highest unemployment rates and illegals take the kind of low-skill, entry-level jobs one would assume that would be the easiest for the many African Americans with poor educations to take. This leads to the questions of racial discrimination, although that seems complicated by the idea that Latinos can get these jobs. Then there's arguments about jobs "we won't do" but this begs the quesiton as to why those jobs don't pay more (I guess they don't have to with a supply of illegals) or whether people have some moral right to not work for jobs they don't want, yet be able to demand subsidies for not working.

    7. Re:Christie is ideal by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Which would be only proper. You break it - you buy it. And you broke a lot of countries.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Christie is ideal by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      We can deport most the illegals, nothing crazy about it. Easy and cheap too, no need for expensive "holding centers" or any of the other strawman arguments raised.

      Countries have borders and laws and immigration procedures. Those that don't obey them are criminals and can and should be thrown out.

      On average, inner city african americans have a subculture that makes them less employable. They or someone needs to change that subculture, because being less capable and lazier than a latino will indeed make them less employable. Oooo, that was racist, I can hear you bleeding hearts wail. Truth hurts, stereotypes that are generally true are useful.

    9. Re:Christie is ideal by Headw1nd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Explain how locating and transporting 11 million people, who by their very nature are not on record, is going to be "easy" and "cheap". While you're at it, explain how you will do this without accidentally capturing and transporting US citizens.

    10. Re:Christie is ideal by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Trump's already said he'll get the Mexicans to pay for the wall. He's a builder, he can build it, and it's going to be beautiful. Of course it would be. You think Trump would build an ugly wall?

      Do you really think fat losers like Hillary or Sanders could get the Mexicans to pay for the wall? Why would anyone vote for them? Do you wanna pay for the wall? And you know a wall those losers build would be uglier than Rosie O'Donell.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    11. Re:Christie is ideal by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Partly - yes. Why? I'm an American. I'm not Russian-American, Mexican-American, African-American, or any other hyphenated hogwash. I'm American.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:Christie is ideal by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      simple, you start doing it, others take the hint and leave themselves. employers get punished for hiring such, they take the hint

      you answer your own question about deporting citizens, "not on record". heck more than half of them speak no english at all, no one brought up in this country and in our school systems will be like that.

    13. Re:Christie is ideal by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Explain how locating and transporting 11 million people, who by their very nature are not on record, is going to be "easy" and "cheap". While you're at it, explain how you will do this without accidentally capturing and transporting US citizens.

      But, to Trump and his ilk, brown people aren't "real Americans", so it doesn't matter if some US citizens get sent south of the border in some sweeping dragnet.

    14. Re:Christie is ideal by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      But the completely baffling thing to me is that there are actually droves of people in the US that not only support Trump, but actively defend his words and say asinine shit like: "He's a true American. We need a guy like that for president" and: "The media are making him sound racist".

      I used to wonder that too, but I think he succeeds because his mere existence shows how stupid the rest of the field of politicians actually is. It pops them out of their reality distortion field. Seriously, look at this Chris Christie just outed himself as clearly stupider than Trump. And remember, he's one of the guys who markets himself as competent.

      It might be a similar thing on the Democrat side: Bernie Sanders is popular because in comparison, the other candidates are fake, plastic balls of self absorbed ambition.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Christie is ideal by russotto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You break it - you buy it. And you broke a lot of countries.

      So you want the US to go full imperialist? It's an idea; solve the Mexican illegal immigrant problem by annexing Mexico. Send in a team of special prosecutors (perhaps ex-US Attorneys headed by Christie) to bring the corruption down to New Jersey levels, then admit the Mexican States to the US.

    16. Re:Christie is ideal by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      But the completely baffling thing to me is that there are actually droves of people in the US that not only support Trump

      Trump is the one guy that's not saying political speak and is not afraid to mince words. I think a lot of people are sick and tired of hearing politicians just dance around issues and since he has no desire to do so, that makes him popular. That is a pretty appealing proposition even to me - though I would likely never vote for Trump.

    17. Re:Christie is ideal by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      We have a peach packing plant in my area that employs hundreds of migrant workers. They are all here legally. They come every year, make their money and return to their homes when the season ends. It's amazing how well it works. Yes, we need the laborers but we need to operate within the law. It's not that fucking hard. It's mostly shoddy operators in the US that want labor with no rules. No visas, no OSHA, no minimum wage. Basically just slave labor that has no rights to complain about conditions. Since they are desperate they get exploited by employers that care only for profits. They can't get American labor to work like a slave in hazardous conditions for next to no pay so they utilize illegals. It needs to stop and all it will take is serious jail time for these assholes. That is never going to happen though.

    18. Re:Christie is ideal by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      That is a pretty appealing proposition even to me

      Oh, for fuck's sake. You people are on Slashdot as well?

      You are as moronic as Trump is. Just because you can relate to swinging an axe does not mean it's the best way to build a nuclear reactor. Moreover, if you really think that Trump is not 'saying political speak', then you are as naive as a 1-year old. If there is one guarantee in politics it is that the populists always end up being the ones who realize the fewest of their promises or just royally fuck up their country sooner or later.

      There is a reason why matters on a national scale generally require complex nuanced solutions (or slave labor, slave labor always works) and that is that running a country properly is fucking hard. Talk is cheap.

    19. Re:Christie is ideal by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the kind of operation I like seeing. People treated like people with safety standards, rights etc. They come and do the job and stay within the bounds of their visa.

      I think we would all be better off if everyone that came into this country (at least to the extent feasible) came in on an actual visa and passed a basic background check. If you have things as big as people making it across your border without knowing then lots of other stuff makes it across also and that is a large security hole that should be dealt with.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    20. Re:Christie is ideal by swb · · Score: 1

      Immigration right now is a classic example of the bootlegger and the baptist.

      The bootlegger wants booze illegal because he makes a bigger profit. The baptist wants booze illegal becaue it keeps the pews full on Sunday morning. It's a reciprocal relationship that makes everyone worse off.

      Immigration works the same way. The Republicans like porous borders and weak enforcement because it provides a cheap and compliant labor force as well as suppresing wages generally. The Democrats like porous borders and weak enforcement because they believe a larger non-white population will give them a demographic advantage in elections.

      The irony for the Republicans is that bulk importing poor people from the third world only drives up government expenditures and ultimately taxes. Democrats assume that the generally devout Catholics of Latin America will somehow embrace a political agenda of secular liberalism, as if the history of Latin America wasn't littered with wreckage of right wing authoritarianism.

    21. Re:Christie is ideal by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      simple, you start doing it, others take the hint and leave themselves. employers get punished for hiring such, they take the hint

      Like how arresting drug dealers stops drug dealing you mean? The only thing simple about this is you....

    22. Re:Christie is ideal by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      I was simply giving you the perspective of people I know that like him.

      I was planning on voting for Sanders unless he's clearly out and then would have to figure out what Republican I would vote for in the primary. Not a lot of good options.

    23. Re:Christie is ideal by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I want Visas available for all the jobs we need doing. Right now we can't get american's to pick food and until we have robots doing it we need people to do it. We should have a visa just for this purpose and have people get it legally. They should come here legally, work here legally and NOT be exploited by farmers, factories etc.

      You clearly do not understand the issue here. The reason that illegal immigrants can find work is because they work without the protections afforded to the American worker. This makes the immigrants cheaper to hire. This means the farmers and factories are in fact exploiting the immigrants. Without the economic incentive, there would be fewer illegal immigrants.

      To word it in another manner, it is the ability to exploit the illegal immigrant that makes the illegal immigrant valuable. Americans would do the work but the farmers and factories do not want the baggage that comes with American workers (Social Security, payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, potential lawsuits, etc). Understand?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    24. Re:Christie is ideal by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Saying "even to me" means that you support that way of thinking. Don't hide behind "I'm explaining other people's thoughts".
      You have to realize that supporting the "at least he's honest/straightforward" way of thinking in any way is detrimental to the wellbeing of a representative democracy.

      Real honesty is when politicians say: "Well, I can't really make any promises. There are a lot of factors influencing this and I will probably gain new insights in the future which will give me a more complete picture of the matter, which in turn might lead me to another solution than the one I currently believe is the best one. I can promise that I will try to select a solution to the best of my ability at any time in the future."
      NOT:
      "We're going to deport all those illegal immigrants."

      The problem with the first one is that everybody chews up the guy saying such things as 'having no vision' or 'being weak' or whatever shortsighted qualification the primitive brain comes up with. Nuance doesn't sell.
      The second one may sound very straightforward, decisive and 'leader-like', but it locks the speaker to a specific action, which removes all opportunity of using new insights (which may determine the action to be unwise). Promising the attainment of specific results ("We're going to let the economy grow by 3% next year") is also extremely problematic, as there is no way to guarantee it will come true.

      So, what can you do, as a politician? True honesty gets you ridiculed and keeps you from getting elected. Making a lot of promises will get you elected, but will bite you in the ass in the future (many choose this path anyway, trusting that they can take or mitigate the bite). What remains is trying to dance around the issues and promise as little as possible while sounding as if you know what you're doing and are a great person.

      My point is that public opinion breeds political speak. Stop lamenting the 'straightforward' assholes and start praising the truly honest politicians.

    25. Re:Christie is ideal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's not really baffling when you realize that the main attraction of Trump is that he's saying what the Republican base has been thinking but hiding for several decades now. He represents the ultimate, final closure of the dog whistle politics.

    26. Re:Christie is ideal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      US has almost annexed Mexico back in the 18th century, actually (ironically, the main reason why this wasn't popular was racism and anti-Catholic sentiment).

      I can't help but think that if they did, it would have turned out much better for the Mexicans.

    27. Re:Christie is ideal by jcr · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break it to you, but "fox news" is not some magic word that dismisses all the crimes committed by the people you worship.

      Hillary Clinton has violated the espionage act, and other statutes relating to securing public records. She has knowingly attempted to destroy evidence. She has lobbied for foreign interests in exchange for millions of dollars paid into her family slush fund. She may or may not do time for it, depending on whether the Obama regime thinks they can get away with ignoring it.

      She is a crook, and that simple fact would remain, even if Fox News had never existed.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    28. Re:Christie is ideal by dywolf · · Score: 1

      I dearly hope that is simply an impression of a RWNJ.
      Cause if serious, that is one of the most delusional posts I've read today.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    29. Re:Christie is ideal by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Hey, what's moving a few million immigrants when folks like Flyhelicopters think its perfectly reasonable to 'just move' the 4 billion people living near a coast as their answer to climate change and rising seas?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    30. Re:Christie is ideal by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Yep it was racist.
      Congratulations, you've identified the problem.
      Step 2 is doing something about it.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    31. Re:Christie is ideal by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... The terrorist who was rewarded by the left with a professor position

      Hillary, capitalizing on her appointment as secretary of state to the tune of 300 million dollars

      RWNJ? No - I'm far more centrist. I'm not left or right. I'm a realist. Delusional, you say? Phhtt. Look around you. The left sells America out, just as readily as the far right does.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    32. Re:Christie is ideal by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that much of what Kerry babbled about was simply untrue. He wasn't there, he didn't see it, he didn't participate. He made shit up, in the aftermath of real atrocities, committed elsewhere.

      Oh - wait - you saw that, didn't you? I readily admit that the US did indeed commit atrocities in Viet Nam. They are on record. It happened. I'm not defending them, I'm not defending the people responsible, nor am I defending the dirty politicos who made it happen.

      But Kerry is a lying sack of shit. Kerry was an opportunist from the day he entered the military, to the day he wrote his own Purple Heart commendations, to the day he lied to congress, to the day he was elected, and now today, sucking Muslim dick while hoodwinking the American people.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    33. Re:Christie is ideal by whodunit · · Score: 1

      So you want the US to go full imperialist? It's an idea; solve the Mexican illegal immigrant problem by annexing Mexico. Send in a team of special prosecutors (perhaps ex-US Attorneys headed by Christie) to bring the corruption down to New Jersey levels, then admit the Mexican States to the US.

      Woah, woah, slow down there pal. Do you really want another California?

  3. SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I dunno, I've been watching the rise of the SJW phenomenon online over the last few years, mostly with distaste - in particular for unabashed hate movements like feminism - but when it comes to racism I've slowly been forced to conclude that quite a lot of Americans really are racists to a surprising degree. Now that doesn't mean unchecked immigration is a good thing, but what Trump and company are smoking out of the bushes are a huge population of genuine xenophobes.

    The other thing I've noticed is the degree to which SJWs actually cause the reactions they want to claim are reactionary. If they weren't out there shrieking about white privilege and telling white people to kill themselves, it seems likely that Trump and Christie wouldn't be getting the support they're getting. The SJW approach is less to support the downtrodden than to attack whoever they feel is oppressing others, which in turn causes the "oppressors" - who for the most part aren't anything of the sort - to become radicalised and polarised. SJWs creat the monster they claim exists, and it didn't have to be that way at all.

    I think Morgan Freeman has the best approach to dealing with racism, and that is to just stop talking about it.

    1. Re:SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's it, these SJW's are the problem, why they even make you call them SJW. They make themselves a target and encourage bullying. If only they'd shut up, it'd go away.

      Wait, wait, no, this isn't recent, this isn't new, this is the same argument that was used in the 1840s and 1850s against abolitionists, or in the late 1700s to early 1800s against American and French revolutionaries, and in the 1500s against Protestants. And don't believe I don't have examples I could bring up earlier or more recently.

      But I get it, you'd rather believe things would have naturally ended, that it would have resolved itself. As Morgan Freeman said, you're wrong, of course. So was he.

    2. Re:SJWs by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, anyone you don't like or who says things you don't like is an SJW...

    3. Re:SJWs by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      I think Morgan Freeman has the best approach to dealing with racism, and that is to just stop talking about it.

      So, you should have shut up in first place.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait, no, this isn't recent, this isn't new, this is the same argument that was used in the 1840s and 1850s against abolitionists, or in the late 1700s to early 1800s against American and French revolutionaries, and in the 1500s against Protestants.

      Abolitionists weren't calling everyone a racist, they were telling people that slaveholding was wrong. American and French revolutionaries weren't branding every citizen of Britain or France tyrannical despots, they were addressing specific issues. Protestants weren't calling all Catholics scumbags, they were protesting against corruption in the church. Although many of them did eventually graduate to general sectarian hatred, despite which the Catholic church is still going strong.

      What the SJWs are engaging in is a form of collective punishment, which is at best only going to create enemies where none existed before. Claims of some sort of ideological heritage with groups who used completely different methods and who would have found SJWs risibile are easily discounted.

      But I get it, you'd rather believe things would have naturally ended, that it would have resolved itself. As Morgan Freeman said, you're wrong, of course. So was he.

      His position is a bit more nuanced than you seem to think. For starters the very idea of race as black, white, brown, yellow, etc was first popularised in the early 19th century, a time when scientific racism also began to flourish. Surely you can see how attacking people based on this fundamentally flawed premise is only perpetuating the concept?

    5. Re:SJWs by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Are you really that confused about the difference between someone's ethnic heritage and the things they choose to do, as individuals or cultures?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:SJWs by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3

      Funny thing is - it DID just end in all the rest of the world. Only in the United States are the descendants of slaves still reviled by a significant portion of the former slave holders.

      Only a small percentage of all the slaves transported from Africa to the New World were destined for the US. Brazil got far more slaves than the US did. Brazil has no serious race problem, do they? Maybe you can point to the history of SJW's in Brazil struggling to keep the black man on the plantations? No? Didn't think so.

      YES, SJW'S CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEM!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:SJWs by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      If SJW are only people he doesnt like, that would be true. It is unlikely, so I am going with some people he doesnt like are SJWs.

    8. Re:SJWs by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Racism DID NOT end in Germany. They just stopped talking about it publicaly. Sure the law says that a business can't discriminate based on your race but they actually do. One of the students in my class went back home to India after being accepted in a masters program here in Germany since he found several landlords that told him they did not rent to people from India.

      Europe is too much of a monoculture to see much outward racism but it still exists and it is pretty vile since it is not talked about. Laws against racism seem to be almost never actually enforced at least in Germany. It was just recently a German professor told an Indian male student that she did not accept male students from India because of their rape culture and her university DEFENDED her. She is facing no sanctions of any kind and other professors in Germany have stood up and said they do the same thing. That is truly evil.

      The USA is having a hard time trying to deal with racism but it actually trying to deal with it and the road is going to be bumpy and violent but I think it will work out in the end and meanwhile Europe will just quietly keep it and hide it.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    9. Re:SJWs by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      So - lemme get this straight. India does indeed have a rape culture. It's pretty well documented. There are new atrocities published multiple times every year. So, a woman objects to being in proximity to a male whom she might reasonably expect to have been indoctrinated into the rape culture. That is RACISM?!?!

      Sorry, you lose points in the credibility department, because you don't know the difference between racism and other forms of prejudice. Further, I'll hold that not all forms of discrimination are bad.

      The only people who commit more rapes than Indians, are probable the swine from Daesh, al Queda, and other sects of virulent Islam.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re: SJWs by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Saying that all Indian men are rapists is racism and sexism. Hip hop artists are misogynist homophobic glorifiers of crime but that doesn't mean that all black men are like that and seeing they are it's racist and sexist as well.

    11. Re: SJWs by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Saying not seeing stupid autocorrect.

    12. Re: SJWs by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      "Indian" is not a race, is it? I thought it was a nationality. India encompasses multiple races, multiple religions, multiple cultures, multiple tribes and sects. India. Let me check - I could be wrong . . .

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=India+dem...

      Try this link first, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:SJWs by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Do you really think a highly educated indian male with a masters degree already and applying to a German university for a PhD and probably to stay if accepted is a likely person that supports all the rape that happens in india? So far my experience in Germany is that the Indian students I have met say that the rape culture is evil and they need to find a way to fix it but they have no idea how to do it.

      An Indian with a German PhD would end up being a highly productive member of society for any of the EU countries and countries like Germany actively make it easy for people with advanced degrees to get in and find jobs.

      In the end the view is definitely racism and unwarranted.

      However if would NOT recommend that any woman actually go to India since you would not exactly be around the best at brightest that way.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    14. Re:SJWs by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      So - an educated man cannot be an evil man. Got it. Get a degree, and most people are good with anything you might do. Smart men don't do anything evil. Geez, Louise!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    15. Re:SJWs by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Logic? You want logic? That's funny - racism isn't logical. Rape isn't logical. Theft isn't logical. Hatred isn't logical. Life is not logical. Real life is life, you deal with it. I presume that you're whining about my perception of India's rape culture. The rape culture is real. Women must take that into account.

      What logic, exactly, leads you to believe that an Indian with a degree can't rape women? You need to read the India Times. There are a lot of educated Indian men who defend the rape culture. Men in high government offices have resisted attempts to "fix" the problem. Men in law enforcement have protected rapists. In fact, senior law enforcement officers have participated in gang rapes.

      Pull your head out, and stop equating education with ethics, morals, and humanity. Just reach behind you, grasp both of your ears, and pull hard. Your head should pop right out of your anus, at which point you can breathe freely. Give it a few minutes for oxygen to circulate to your brain before thinking about logic.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    16. Re:SJWs by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is - it DID just end in all the rest of the world. Only in the United States are the descendants of slaves still reviled by a significant portion of the former slave holders.

      Only a small percentage of all the slaves transported from Africa to the New World were destined for the US. Brazil got far more slaves than the US did. Brazil has no serious race problem, do they? Maybe you can point to the history of SJW's in Brazil struggling to keep the black man on the plantations? No? Didn't think so.

      YES, SJW'S CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEM!!

      Well you could blame US race relationions on a SJW phenomena that has only been around for 10-20 years, or you could blame it on a country which had to fight a civil war with the south to eliminate slavery, had another massive political fight with the south to eliminate institutional racism, and still has legislators and government officials actively trying to suppress minority voters.

      Yeah, I guess it's totally the SJWs' fault*...

      * Yes I realize you said "contribute" not "cause" but racism is heavily entrenched in US society (and many other societies). SJWs are guilty of suppressing some legitimate speech, but not of causing racism.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    17. Re: SJWs by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in your tedious pedantry. Stop being racist.

  4. Not amused by aepervius · · Score: 2

    "I'm sure foreign tourist will be amused when getting a bar code sticker slapped on their arm."

    Yeah i am sure amused to be tracked all the time like cattle with a tag and not having a private moment. Being treated like an animals sound fun. Why don't you start first Chrissie sweetie. How about we attach a gps tag on your ankle. That sound fun right ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Not amused by hattig · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could be tattooed on? And maybe the visitors could be kept in camps, to stop them wandering around and breaking the system.

      This guy is a fascist, pure and simple, and he's pulling his ideas from historical fascist policy.

  5. America has been put in a bad position. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    America has been put in a bad position. There are laws of the land concerning who may enter and remain in the country. Yet as we've seen, the enforcement of these laws has been quite lax. We see third-worlders streaming into America, typically from its southern border, in violation of these laws. There are severe economic consequences of this. There are political consequences. There are social consequences. It's absolutely awful for the migrants who came to the US legally. These people did things properly, jumped through many hoops, and then are forced to watch as the worst of the third-worlders bypass all of the laws and get preferential treatment.

    Had the laws been enforced, and illegal aliens prevented from entering or removed after they had been found, then America wouldn't be in the position it is currently in. So it's not totally unreasonable for there to be tracking of visitors. It doesn't have to apply to all visitors, obviously. Just those who are a risk for violating American law. The Japanese business executive who is in America for several days for business meetings does not need to be tracked. The Nicaraguan with no job, no education, no English skills, and much to gain by illegally remaining in America probably should be tracked.

    1. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that people who are there legally should be the ones to be tracked. No microchip = deportation.

    2. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      There are severe economic consequences of this.

      Yes, there are. They are generally positive. But don't believe me. Have a look at what a conservative think tank has to say:
      http://www.hoover.org/research...

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    3. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      The problem is that Americans think their problems are a result of immigration. The issue is nothing more than a convenient political scapegoat that populists are all but desperate to eat up as it appears to legitimize their xenophobia and present a simple, or at least theoretically attainable, goal. A goal which is a solution for nothing, but a goal none-the-less. When folks have socially unacceptable attitudes, they are easily led to believe they are part of the "real talk" truth - as if they are somehow inherently mature or realist. It's the same reason why nutjobs fell into the 9/11 truther bullshit. It's nothing but a dog and pony show for the middle class so that they don't tune into the real problems America faces.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The problem is illegal immigrants do not get visas, since they are illegal by definition.

      You're not paying attention. The topic at hand are the people who enter the country legally with a visa, and then decide to illegally overstay their visa, becoming illegal immigrants, by definition.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by polymath69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      According to the article, 40% of illegals are visa overstayers. This breaks the syllogism you attempted to imply all asunder.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    6. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by godrik · · Score: 1

      > The Nicaraguan with no job, no education, no English skills, and much to gain by illegally remaining in America probably should be tracked.

      Well, this hypothetical Nicaraguan is likely not to get a tourist visa to the US. The process of obtaining a tourist visa includes showing that you have enough ties in your own country that you will not stay. I know people who got their tourist visa refused based on that criteria.

    7. Re:America has been put in a bad position. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Not enforced? Tidal wave?

      A few inconvenient facts:
      -net immigration across the Mexican border has been 0 for the past few years
      -Hispanics call Obama the Deporter in Chief, since he's deported more immigrants than any other President before him, more than the last 4 combined
      -the number of legal immigrants is woefully tiny, as immigration to the US is practically impossible. the old dream of seeking a better life by just showing up at the door is long dead and buried; you can only get in if you already know someone inside

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  6. Firing up the base by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Yup, playing to the unwashed masses. Same as Hillary saying the Republican party is a "terrorist group".

    1. Re:Firing up the base by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Well, if by terrorist group she means keeping people constantly afraid that some immigrant is going to rape and kill them, and that we have to ship them all away...

      Watch fox news for about 10 minutes, and there will be some fear-mongerer there.

      (Note, I could not read you link, Time seems to be buggy and not show anything more than the first paragraph.)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Firing up the base by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      And your Hillary quote begets any number of Republican presidential candidates comparing the Sitting US president to hilter and so on and so forth. We've reached the hyperbole singularity and have nowhere to go but straight to the very bottom. I'm surprised no one has seriously accused the other side of literally eating babies on camera yet but there are still 14 months till the election (as John Oliver put it, there will be babies born before the election who's parents haven't even met yet).

      My point is, we're so far off the deep end there is nothing to be gained by pointing out "but but but they said...". Fortunately there is also nothing to be lost! So good sir, I implore you to just give up on all this bullshit till Nov 2 just as I have resolved to do. Enjoy!

  7. Dumbest thing I've heard today. by 3vi1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FedEx packages are travelling through a confined system of checkpoints. Unless Christie wants to put checkpoints all around America and have everyone showing their papers to TSA agents on every public highway, it just won't work.

    1. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He probably does.

    2. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      And it is not that accurate as Christie believes it is. There is a limited number of locations the package can be: cargo airplane, truck, border/customs, distribution centers. FedEx doesn't update a map with the GPS coordinates of your package.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      I rather want to believe he thought it was a joke rather than an immigration policy initiative...you know, the kind of thing a celebrity bounces off his sycophantic entourage instead of a single critical ear.

      Part of Trump's charm seems to be his lack of a filter in this be careful as fuck what you say era we live in.

      It would appear the Jersey Governor may lack the Donald's Teflon skin.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually packages can only be at two locations: "your house" and "still in transit".

    5. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, once the infrastructure is in place, we might as well use it to scan other groups of US citizens, as well. Such as, convicted criminals and the members of the Ohio Presbyterian Grandmothers Association Luncheon.

      Why members of the Ohio Presbyterian Grandmothers Association Luncheon?

      Why not? "Because we can", says the NSA . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by kevmeister · · Score: 1

      FedEx packages are travelling through a confined system of checkpoints. Unless Christie wants to put checkpoints all around America and have everyone showing their papers to TSA agents on every public highway, it just won't work.

      The day is young! This most likely means you have just not heard the latest comments from some other candidate. If all else fails (and it probably won't), you can depend on The Donald.

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    7. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      The only technology I know that'd let you do something similar to FedEx for humans would be GPS-enabled ankle monitors. You know, those we use to track dangerous criminals and where even then it's rather controversial in most of the (sane) world.

      If Christie wants to be associated with that kind of stuff, I suggest he first volunteer for one. I'm sure he'd appreciate everyone knowing how many mistresses he has and with which party donor he goes to eat out.

    8. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they believe it's all tracked with RFIDs read by the GPS satellites. Never underestimate the stupid of people. Bush, a good 10 years after barcode scanners were in all supermarkets, went on a publicity trip and was amazed by them. Politicians live in a separate world, we can't begin to understand.

    9. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by whyde · · Score: 1

      Last week I had a situation where my package was both at "my house" (according to FedEx, no signature required--left on doorstep), and "still in transit" (according to me, working from home and saw the truck pull up near my driveway, driver set a package on the dashboard then go into the back to fetch a 2nd package which he delivered to a neighbor, then drove off without actually delivering mine).

      After a complaint call to FedEx about no packge, they promised to get back to me straight away. Never did, but my package did appear on Monday (mis-delivery was on a Friday) without any mention of it in the tracking log or a follow-up phone call.

      So, I believe this is a case of Schrodinger's status, where it was both "delivered" and "in transit" at the same time for the entire weekend.

    10. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Face recognition cameras installed on every intersection. Only for tracking the immigrants, honest.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    11. Re:Dumbest thing I've heard today. by romco · · Score: 2

      Have you been paying attention to the republican plan?

      1. Track Aliens
      2. Put walls up at both Canada and Mexico
      3. Destroy Public schools
      4. More private prisons
      5. Stronger drug and other sentencing to fill said prisons.
      6. Bigger war machine
      7. No minimum wage
      8. Cut taxes for rich and business, increase tax for everyone else
      9. Health care plan "Let them die"
      10. Reduce voting of poor people.

      These people are no longer republican, they are fascist. Yes, they are going to want to see your papers.

      --
      AdFuel
  8. Lock them in trucks? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like Christie was inspired by last week's news from Austria.

    Like so very many problems, this one becomes much simpler once you stop thinking of "them" as people.

    1. Re:Lock them in trucks? by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      So what are we looking ideally?
      1. Chip that is compatible with Electronic toll collection used in EU(Autopass, etc) just for tracking
      2. Plant it on them, with identification
      3. Do nothing really, except enjoy statistics and maps

    2. Re:Lock them in trucks? by Alomex · · Score: 1

      They are not people. They are illegal aliens (from another planet I guess) who come here to steal our jobs (does anyone hold certificate of ownership to a job? because if you don't then it cannot be "stolen" from you) and rape our children (even though their incarceration rate outside of immigration offenses [duh!] is lower than the general population).

      Just ask that man of the people, Donald Trump.

  9. Until they can't by dirk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, FedEx can tell you exactly where a package is, until they can't anymore. It's not like they don't lose packages. The only reason they can track them as well as they do is because they are going to a limit number of areas where they are scanned going in and out of each. And they still lose them sometime. Unless we are going to have immigrant get scanned in everywhere they go, there isn't a way to track people the same way we track packages.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    1. Re:Until they can't by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      Well, they could always take a book out of China (until some years ago) or North Korea's book, and demand that all foreign visitors are at all times followed by a minder...

    2. Re:Until they can't by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      Unless we are going to have immigrant get scanned in everywhere they go

      Credit cards? You could require people with visas to be paid only through special accounts accessible by card. Mind, I'm not saying you should. But you'd have a lot of incentive for them to "check in" regularly and data about their habits which would probably lead to detectable changes even if they handed off the card. Of course, with premeditation, human beings can still disappear, but it might be evident when it happens and where to start the investigation.

    3. Re:Until they can't by retchdog · · Score: 1

      My God, man, that's just unthinkable!

      I mean, because it would be so expensive. Apart from that, I don't think anyone would have much of a problem.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Until they can't by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      :)

  10. Re:Unnecessary by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The last thing I want to see is the travesty that is asset forfeiture expanded.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  11. or tatoo by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I am sure Chrissie sweetie would cream his pant at the idea of attooing or putting tag on tourist/visa visitor, but the idea is quite old : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and it was done efficiently too.


    /gowdinning the whole article.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  12. FedEx knows exactly where my package is? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha. I call bullshit.

    I usually get three or four status updates when I track a package: The first is usually something like "package left Wichita, Kansas facility." Two or three days later I see "Arrived in Marieta, Georgia facility." Then "package is out for delivery." A couple hours after delivery there's a "package delivered" update.

    That's a damn far cry from knowing where it is at any given moment.

    1. Re:FedEx knows exactly where my package is? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I can't remember which one it was, but I once had a package that was still saying "in transit" two or three days after receiving it.

  13. Re:Let's tattoo numbers on their arms by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I thought it was blue triangles for immigrants.

  14. Wrong people to strip by realxmp · · Score: 5, Informative

    They still would come because they have nothing to lose, most of them have net assets of close to zero. The first generation tends to live hand to mouth. The people who make the money are the American factory owners and farmers who employ them. These are the people you would need to asset strip to stop employment of immigrants but if we think politicians are going to go after these people (their biggest donors) we are naive. Incidentally if the U.S. did manage to deport all 11 million of them it would cause a massive economic implosion due to a drop in demand for basic goods. It would likely also cause a closure of US factories and increase the offshoring of US industry.

    1. Re:Wrong people to strip by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      if the U.S. did manage to deport all 11 million of them it would cause a massive economic implosion due to a drop in demand for basic goods.

      The savings in entitlement expenses would more than compensate

      It would likely also cause a closure of US factories and increase the offshoring of US industry.

      The lower operational risk would more than compensate.

      But I agree that parasitical businesses are the problem, besides confiscating their assets we could also have Chinese-style executions.

    2. Re:Wrong people to strip by Alomex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The savings in entitlement expenses would more than compensate

      [citation needed]

      In fact I'll save you the trouble, people have studied this and found the exact opposite. Illegal immigrants can access few entitlements yet pay many taxes, so they are usually net contributors.

      That is, if you care about the facts.

    3. Re:Wrong people to strip by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      To the point that not long ago, some conservatives were encouraging more immigration as a way to save social security.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Wrong people to strip by jittles · · Score: 1

      The savings in entitlement expenses would more than compensate

      [citation needed]

      In fact I'll save you the trouble, people have studied this and found the exact opposite. Illegal immigrants can access few entitlements yet pay many taxes, so they are usually net contributors.

      That is, if you care about the facts.

      Do those studies take into consideration the cost of emergency medical services, or just welfare, WIC, SNAP and other programs that would pay directly to the recipient? I haven't done any research into the matter, just curious.

    5. Re:Wrong people to strip by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Then we need more immigrants. At some point there must be diminishing returns. How many would that be? 50 million, 100 million?

    6. Re:Wrong people to strip by TedHornsby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I work in the construction industry, an industry especially notorious for the employment of illegal immigrants, so I have some personal experience in regards to illegal immigration. First of all, this picture Donald Trump has been painting of violent criminals and Mexican citizens coming here in droves to live off government welfare programs is just not true. These are blue-collar, hard-working, decent people who have come here to escape ruthless violence (fueled by American demand for illegal drugs) and extensive poverty. They have become the foundation that several sectors of the US economy are built on. What people like Donald Trump and his ilk need to realize is that the violent criminals, for the most part, have no real inclination to pack up and move themselves across the Rio Grande. It's much easier for these drug gangs to operate on their side of the border, where widespread corruption has enabled them to operate with near impunity, than it is for them to "invade" America, where they have to deal with state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies that are more motivated by arrest and seizure statistics than a personal bribe. Speaking from my own experiences, the career criminals that do come across the border end up being arrested over here, which results in their deportation back across the border. 99% of Mexicans here illegally are ordinary people simply trying to support themselves and their families. As things are now, these people live in constant fear that any encounter or interaction with police or government officials will end up with them sitting in a holding cell, awaiting deportation, while their wife and children remain in America. These families are torn apart, with wives and mothers suddenly finding themselves with 3 children to support and no source of income. One woman I know of has resorted to collecting scrap metal to support a 5 year-old son and infant daughter. The sight of a 5 year-old kid helping his mother load an old water heater into a truck so that they might be able to keep a roof over their heads is something that those arguing for tougher immigration enforcement never have, and probably never will, experience. The truth of the matter is that those working here illegally are not much different from the people who comprise our own working-class. In fact, Mexican workers that are paid "under-the-table" (as in they don't have anything taxes taken out of their paycheck) are relatively rare. Meaning they financially contribute to a system under which they are considered as faceless statistics and under which they have no voice. This has gotten long enough, so I'll stop here. Just remember, that just because someone is labeled "illegal" does not make them a criminal. P.S.: Before somebody decides to get pedantic with that last statement, I am aware that being here illegally means they are in violation of the law, and technically a criminal. What I was trying to illustrate was the absurdity that people are criminalized for simply providing for themselves and their loved ones.

    7. Re:Wrong people to strip by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      In fact I'll save you the trouble, people have studied this and found the exact opposite.

      While I agree with you, it's rather ironic that you started your post with "citation needed" but then made a counter-statement that isn't supported with any citation.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Wrong people to strip by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That's why it hasn't been stamped out. Too many people benefit. Employers employ these poor people because they are desperate. They often pay them less than minimum wage with no benefits and in environments that would make OSHA have a fit. Who are they going to complain to? The perfect victims.

    9. Re:Wrong people to strip by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      EMS (generally) isn't government money. The private hospitals eat the cost of unpaid bills. Do you have anything to indicate that illegals pay their bills less than the equivalent citizen? The few things I've seen on it (that didn't touch on health care) indicate illegals pay bills better, because they don't want the attention that not paying bills brings.

      WIC and SNAP and such are generally tied to SSN as the identifier. An illegal doesn't file for welfare in the US, because it would bring unwanted attention. In other places, the human right of food is higher than the state right of borders, to they don't mind illegals on welfare as much (though, from what I've seen this has changed, to where more are US like now). Perhaps if a citizen baby was being cared for by an illegal, the parents may file for WIC to see what happens, assuming they can't get deported with an anchor baby. But I've not seen any studies done on that part either. Both sides would rather ignore the problem and keep it as vague talking points for election time.

    10. Re:Wrong people to strip by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The one family of illegals I know came over from El Salvador when the death squads targeted his family (long story, he did nothing). Oh, and the death squads were US-backed because they opposed the communists. So the political refugee came across. Of course, not being dumb, he got fake Mexican papers on his way through, and when he was caught the first few times, he was deported to Mexico, not El Salvador. So in my limited personal experience, 100% of "illegal aliens" from Mexico are not even Mexican. But to Trump, that distinction is meaningless.

      The real issue is that because we don't have sensible immigration laws, we have a lot of people coming over the southern border. Any terrorist who was already on a watch list (unlike the 9/11 crew, who were recruited because they weren't on a list), could just fly into Mexico, and walk across with all the other illegals. Sealing the southern border and making new classes of migrant worker visas and such would be a much better idea, but for whatever reason, neither party wants to seal the border and still let in lots of Mexicans. Though that's the only rational choice.

    11. Re:Wrong people to strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about they work to better their own countries instead of coming to the US? Why doesn't Mexico have an illegal immigration problem of its own with a flood of people from Central American countries? Oh that's right. They tightened their southern border with Guatemala and those that do get through are trying to make it to the US, not stay in Mexico.

      How come Japan doesn't have a problem with illegal immigrants? Oh that's right - almost no one is allowed to immigrate.

      Why doesn't Australia have a problem with illegal immigrants? Oh that's right - they lock them up in prisons in shithole locations like the middle of a desert until they can deport them.

      I don't care that you are trying to support your family - being an economic refugee who paid a smuggler to bring you the US is not the same thing as fleeing government-sanctioned death squads who want to kill you because of your political/religious beliefs or your ethnicity. How many of them then come to the US to be exploited again in a sweatshop, swinging a hammer, or hunched over in the middle of a farm field rather than having marketable skills?

      I would also have no issues whatsoever with the US confiscating profits and property from those that exploit illegals - when the demand dries up, then the supply will also - how many will want to come to the US if they know they aren't going to find work? Oh that's right - our weak-minded leftist President and his democrat cronies think it is just great that those who produce should then shell out taxes to provide handouts to illegals who shouldn't be here to begin with.

      I am just waiting for the day we get some leaders with some balls who will completely dismantle the democrat plantation in all of its forms.

    12. Re:Wrong people to strip by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      It didn't seem like he was talking about the Mexicans running over the border. But people like me who fly in with valid B2/whatever visas, who are then thankfully untracked once in the country. Getting the visa and fingerprinted at every entry was unpleasant enough, and although this bullshit clearly has no chance of being implemented, something like this would could be the final straw that will get tourists or business visitors reconsider coming to the US.

    13. Re:Wrong people to strip by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Sir, I wish I had some mod points.

      Instead, please have some carriage returns (sorry about that, you make a very compelling argument but seriously, wall of text).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:Wrong people to strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that because we don't have sensible immigration laws, we have a lot of people coming over the southern border.

      What exactly is your idea of sensible immigration laws? The US has the most accessible and permissive immigration laws in the world. Unskilled labor without any savings (the kind of people who tend to stream across the border instead of just overstaying their visa) have almost no chance at all of legally immigrating to any country but the US.

      Are our extremely porous border and very permissive immigration laws not extreme enough?

    15. Re:Wrong people to strip by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we make up for that by having very few refugees. Our policy on that is one of the tightest in the world. Sure, we are #11 on the list of # of refugees, but bottom half of the list when you look at refugees per resident. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And the laws aren't nearly as permissive as you state, or we'd have the millions of illegals be millions of immigrants. There's a difference. You can't have it both ways. If we are so permissive, why are there so many millions that are "illegal"?

      And I use "immigration" loosely. We should have 5 million migrant worker visas to pass out to Mexicans and others who want to work seasonal labor in the US. Often they would rather work a season, then go to Mexico until the next season, but they can't because crossing the border is too hard.

      So our unwillingness to issue visas causes illegal immigration that would otherwise be a temporary work trip. The current political climate refuses to recognize the difference between immigrant and non-immigrant visas. Someone with an H1-B can't live in the US indefinitely. So it's not a "immigration" issue. It's a work-visa issue.

      And plenty of places around the world have work visas for high-demand jobs. They just have those jobs generally listed as skilled jobs. In the US, our work demand is mostly for unskilled labor. So our rules are no better. Our standards no higher. It's just the jobs we need the most help with are "lower".

    16. Re:Wrong people to strip by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So your stance is that we should have no restrictions at all with regard to immigration?

      Nope. I never said that. Perhaps you should read what's in front of you, instead of making up lies to make you feel better.

    17. Re:Wrong people to strip by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      japan is a dying country because they have no immigrants. look at the statistics about how many elderly japanese they are going to have with so few young japanese supporting them. the japanese attitude on immigration is nothing to admire, it is in fact something to pity. to see xenophobia so strong that so many japanese would rather their country slowly shrivel and die. it's pathetic sick racist self-destructive and weak. frankly, korean people are pretty much identical to japanese genetically, so the hate against koreans is just moronic

      as for your attitude on hard working immigrants, i would like to know your background. if it isn't native american, why don't you fuck off with your ignorant hypocrisy and go to europe. many of the mexican immigrants have aztec mayan and other native american bloodlines far closer to the original inhabitants here, and so as a racial argument that is so popular with social retards like yourself, have more right to be here than you

      btw, if your ancestors were italian or irish, they got exactly the same thuggy hysterical racist hate you heap on mexicans

      if you endorse civil forfeiture, you really should educate your ignorance of the kind of abuse that has played out with that applied to american citizens. with noncitizens, that abuse will probably get far worse, and just force them to stash their money with mexican mafias. thereby actually creating the crime you and your low iq propaganda tries to pin on these hard working people

      I am just waiting for the day we get some leaders with some balls who will completely dismantle the democrat plantation in all of its forms.

      the demographics are clear and the nation is trending democratic. so why don't you hurry up and die with the rest of your old knuckledragging retard friends

      fighting fights from 50, 100, 150 years ago that were already lost with previous waves of immigrants that are now called "true american"

      btw, my WASP ancestors came over in the 1600s to new england. fought in king philips war, being scapled by native americans and scalping native americans

      that's my legacy. and so according to the "logic" of you racist mouth breathers that makes me a "real american"

      so granted this fake authority by your loser thought processes, i make the following judgment on you and your ilk: a guy 15 minutes off the plane from somalia or bangladesh or ecuador, if they have a positive outlook and a tolerant attitude, they therefore embody the real american spirit and real american ideals, and i embrace them as fellow real americans

      rather than some "entitled* racist shitbag who thinks he's special because his bitch mother shit you out on in dirt called american, just so you could begin your life of feeling superior for false, ignorant reasons. i wouldn't want to deport you, so you could ruin some other poor country with your dim brain wattage, so perhaps you could be dumped in the marianas trench or some such, apologies to south pacific nations for the stink of your useless stupid corpse

      you're simply not an american in my eyes

      i mean that with every fiber of my being

      you have no fucking clue what real american ideals are

      all you have is whiny entitlement (ironically, considering right wing talking points on that concept)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    18. Re:Wrong people to strip by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      In fact, Mexican workers that are paid "under-the-table" (as in they don't have anything taxes taken out of their paycheck) are relatively rare. Meaning they financially contribute to a system under which they are considered as faceless statistics and under which they have no voice.

      Relatively rare? So where do the rest of the illegal aliens send their taxes? Do they fill out a W-4 with a fake SSN? Do they use a fake Tax ID number instead? Since they can't claim any excess taxes because they don't file, do they claim 10 exemptions to minimize the withholding amount?

      And what about all the petitioners that are waiting 20+ years for their chance to legally immigrate to the U.S.? Are we to tell them "Sorry, the illegal population is so large that we don't have room for you again this year."? http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

      --

    19. Re: Wrong people to strip by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you speak with such authority

      too bad you don't have any

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    20. Re: Wrong people to strip by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, only because the conservative's only solution is to complain about anchor babies and threaten to deport the baby, which is illegal, based on the Constitution and treaties we've signed. Revoke the 14th Amendment if you don't like it.

    21. Re:Wrong people to strip by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      The US has the most accessible and permissive immigration laws in the world.

      To the point of treating every tourist at the border as a potential legal or illegal immigrant. It's always amusing to see a CBP agent at immigrations at the airport bewildered to the idea that someone might actually look forward to go back to their home country other than the US after their holidays....

      --
      bickerdyke
    22. Re:Wrong people to strip by jittles · · Score: 1

      EMS (generally) isn't government money. The private hospitals eat the cost of unpaid bills. Do you have anything to indicate that illegals pay their bills less than the equivalent citizen? The few things I've seen on it (that didn't touch on health care) indicate illegals pay bills better, because they don't want the attention that not paying bills brings. WIC and SNAP and such are generally tied to SSN as the identifier. An illegal doesn't file for welfare in the US, because it would bring unwanted attention. In other places, the human right of food is higher than the state right of borders, to they don't mind illegals on welfare as much (though, from what I've seen this has changed, to where more are US like now). Perhaps if a citizen baby was being cared for by an illegal, the parents may file for WIC to see what happens, assuming they can't get deported with an anchor baby. But I've not seen any studies done on that part either. Both sides would rather ignore the problem and keep it as vague talking points for election time.

      Well that depends entirely. In my current locale, the only hospital that accepts medicaid is run by the state. Other hospitals in town will only stabilize you and then transfer you to the state hospital ASAP. They do bill that to medicaid, if you have it. From friends that work at the state hospital, over 90% of the patients there never pay any of their bill. So 90% of the costs incurred for treatment are never reimbursed and are covered by state and federal money. Now, I also know that that hospital treats the local homeless community as well. So who is to say how many of them are illegal.

      Illegal immigration is a difficult problem to solve. I would love to see these people become legal so that they can pay their taxes and also receive the benefits that they are entitled to as US citizens but at the same time I feel like granting amnesty and allowing them in with a wave of the hand may just encourage future illegal immigration. I don't think we want to encourage people to break just laws. By entering the country illegally, they are setting themselves up for exploitation. I believe that, by and large, the jobs that they are 'stealing' from citizens are jobs that most citizens feel that they are 'too good for'.

    23. Re: Wrong people to strip by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Nope, they get money for the kid who is an American citizen. That's the kids money, not the parents, and no, no one forgets this. If it weren't for children's programs illegal aliens essentially collect zero dollars in welfare.

    24. Re:Wrong people to strip by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The fact that you compare someone coming here to work with "taking your wife, taking your life" means that yes, you are a racist. Congratulations, you can pass go and collect your KKK badge.

    25. Re:Wrong people to strip by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Religious private schools (which is the closest we have to comparable to public education) is $6K per year. Illegal immigrants tend to have smaller families, so lets say $12K a year. So you are off by a factor of 3. Lastly schools are financed mostly out of property taxes, which everyone pays equally, legal and illegal residents alike.

    26. Re:Wrong people to strip by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No it wouldn't. To say it would shows a blatant disregard for the facts, or just simply blatant ignorance, as to precisely how much of the entitlement expenses, as you call them, they receive.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    27. Re:Wrong people to strip by dywolf · · Score: 1

      +9999
      Nail on the head.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    28. Re:Wrong people to strip by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Bwhahahahaa.

      How can you post that tripe with a straight face?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    29. Re:Wrong people to strip by whodunit · · Score: 1

      These are blue-collar, hard-working, decent people who have come here to escape ruthless violence

      It sure would be nice to separate the honest hard-working blue-collar folks who come into the country seeking a better life from the drug runners and gangsters who caused the "ruthless violence" you speak of, and are doing their damnedest to export it across the Rio Grande - more than they already do, that is, firing .50 caliber machine guns across the river at the DEA. Immigration is about accountability - how are we supposed to send the thieves and thugs packing if we can't even keep track of who is who? Trump is making a damn good point - we can track a UPS package from store to doorstep with childish ease, but the much more serious issue of keeping track of noncitizens in our country is in a hopeless shambles.

      In fact, Mexican workers that are paid "under-the-table" (as in they don't have anything taxes taken out of their paycheck) are relatively rare.

      I'd love to know how their taxes are being reported to the IRS without their non-legal status being noticed - simple complacency? Does the IRS not care as long as they get their cut? But aside from that nobody should be personally insulted if they ARE paid under the table; the only reason most businesses hire such people is that they can get away with paying them less than minimum wage. The fear of deportation after any law enforcement contact cements their status as nonpersons that can be abused and exploited at will.

      If our immigration system was better structured and more efficient, these things wouldn't be a problem. People wouldn't have to overstay their visas illegally to stay in the United States; the path to citizenship would be clear-cut, and we could afford to stop summary deportations because we'd know damn well who was on the straight and narrow and who wasn't. The biggest victims of our fucked-up immigration system are the immigrants themselves.

  15. Our system is NOT GOOD! by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    How do fucktards like this even get to be a governor? People in this country who vote are really fucked in the head.

  16. Re:Unnecessary by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    Just prosecute the ones that violate their visas and if they violated them to make money, asset strip them. How many Mexicans do you think would come here illegally if CBP or local law enforcement had an explicit grant to use civil asset forfeiture to take everything they own?

    There's a minor problem with this plan. The ones who come here illegally? They don't have visas. That's what makes their coming here illegal. If they have a visa, then they came here legally.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  17. Silly season is in full swing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Each year since the late 90's the Republicans have become more and more batshit insane. It's become like a contest now.

    And there are a lot of us out there who would vote Republican again if only they would lose that crazy shit, and get back to real conservative principles, like watch the money, but pay the bills, and to let people alone.

    What is amazing though is that some of their base will go along with this, even though Christie's Star of David patch idea smacks a little of a mark of the beast as well. The amazing thing is that a mainstream candidate like Christie would not think twice about proposing this really bad idea with really bad precedents.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Silly season is in full swing by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Republicans are batshit insane. But - you're going to pretend that the OTHER PARTY IS NOT?!?!?! The Dems are at least as psychotic as the R's are. How 'bout that bitch, Hillary Rodham?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  18. I raise you, Mr. Freedom and Small Government by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both the Republicans and Democrats know the only way to stave off Social Security money scarcity is to inhale large numbers of younger workers (this, by the way, is the exact problem Ponzi schemes have, and why they were made illegal, and why it's a legitimate comparison -- they always run out of new investors to pay back previous ones. They just don't have the legal power to force everyone to invest, delaying, but not stopping, the inevitable. No "investor" gets back as much as they put in...in either.)

    The Republicans are just pissed The Donald has made a stink of it, and now they have to respond with idiocies like this, the more outrageous the better, apparently. Seriously.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:I raise you, Mr. Freedom and Small Government by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Social security is not a Ponzi scheme and they planned for this LONG ago. People contributed a lot more than necessary to build up a fund to make sure social security stayed solvent and based on their predictions it worked.

      The problem social security has is other parts of the government took the money and replaced it with IOUs.

      Social security is not broke, it was robbed and it now broke as a result. I hope the cost of those wars we got with the money was worth it.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    2. Re:I raise you, Mr. Freedom and Small Government by dywolf · · Score: 1

      As usualy, what you posted is simply not true at all.

      In fact, just one simple change that wont affect 99% of Americans would fix the manufactured Social Security crisis: raise or eliminate the income cap.

      Right now only income equal to or less than $118,500 is taxed for Social Security purposes. Earn 200k, 5 million, or even a billion dollars? That's ok, still only taxed on the first 118.5k of it.

      And of course, there's the other issues such as: it's not a Ponzi scheme, you against prove you don't even understand it or how it works, or even that the scare of it running out of money is purely manufactured BS. All of which is frankly tiresome reminding you at this point, so let cut to the chase: you're wrong, and ignorant, again, as usual.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  19. Classic slippery slope by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Let's say for arguments sake that people actually thought this was a good idea; how long would it be before someone came up with some half-assed justification to treat everyone, citizen and visitor alike, this way?

    Also, what ever happened to:

    Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
    With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
    Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
    A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
    Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
    Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
    Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
    The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
    "Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
    With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
    Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

    An idea like Mr. Christies' flies in the face of one of the things this country was supposed to be about in the first place. I know damned well that the United States I grew up believing in never really existed, but damnit, why can't we make it that? I want the Founding Fathers of this country to turn out to be right, not George Orwell!

    Finally, what kind of an asshole do you have to be to come up with an idea like this? Fuck that, and fuck Christie sideways with a rusty chainsaw for even suggesting something like this.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Classic slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Given that human beings evolved in Africa, we are all either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. I am as white as they come, yet I have five ancestors who came over on the Mayflower. They were immigrants, and I am descended of immigrants.

      I hope Christie is really bitten in the butt for this, but then he has a lot of butt to give.

    2. Re:Classic slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This country does not belong to the outsiders, it belongs to me and mine - AMERICAN CITIZENS!

      The Cherokee would like a word with you ...

    3. Re:Classic slippery slope by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

      I really like that poem. However, you should know that at the time, immigration was a controversial issue, too. In 1882, congress passed a law completely stopping immigration from China, for example. The poem (written in 1883) was an example of propaganda, coming clearly on the side of encouraging immigration. But do not be deceived into thinking that everyone felt that way.

      I really like that poem, though.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Classic slippery slope by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      The people of the Six Nations are in turn IMMIGRANTS. Archeologists have established that there were people here 20,000+ years ago - but they can't find evidence of people here 50,000 years ago. Your great-greats came here from SOMEWHERE. And, once they were here, they didn't stay in one place any more than the newest invaders have.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Classic slippery slope by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Here's a tip for you: If you're going to troll, you need to actually put some effort into it. You clearly didn't put ANY effort into any one of your posts, and by the way responding to yourself in support of yourself only proves that you're not even as smart as a 6th grader. You have moved no one with your words; they have been ignored, and you have just embarassed yourself repeatedly. The only way you could possibly look like more of a total nudnik is if you'd actually signed your silly little posts with your real name. By the way are you from Florida? I'll bet you're from Florida.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:Classic slippery slope by dywolf · · Score: 1

      All these anti immigration idiots also forget that illegal immigration is creation of recent history. the 1960's specifically, as part of a bargain struck in the civil rights era. it used to be that the immigration caps on the new world were practically unlimited (something like 120k yearly, but much larger than the actual numbers), and since a lot of them were migrant workers who came up for the harvest season and then returned, they didn't count to it anyway, and no one much cared as, then as now, Americans generally weren't taking those jobs. creating the stricter immigration laws only caused them to stay put once they got here, creating a permanent underclass.

      they talk about people coming here legally, as if the current, nearly impossible horribly expensive and requiring an inside friend, process was how it always was. when the reality is the odl 'immigration process looked more like this:

      Man on dock: Welcome. Names?
      Immigrants: (names)
      Man on dock: Any of you sick?
      Immigrants: Nope.
      Man on dock: Excellent! Have fun! Good luck! It's a big country, go get ya a piece.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  20. Re: Idea stolen from nazi germany by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I thought that tattooing was generally confined to Auschwitz, but you've got the general idea. It was a way to keep track of prisoners so that camp officials could monitor and report on process improvement. The process being the extermination of human beings. Just thinking about it makes me feel like vomiting.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  21. But it wouldn't work anyway. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it wouldn't work anyway.

    I don't think he even understands FedEx. FedEx cannot tell you where a package is RIGHT NOW. They can only tell you where it was LAST SCANNED.

    The reason this works well for packages is that packages don't move themselves. And even then it has failures. This will completely fail because HUMANS can wander around on their own.

    Sounds more like Christie wants to associate his campaign with something that people have a mostly positive opinion of. But I'm pretty sure that FedEx will not want to be associated with a losing candidate OR the concept of tagging and tracking undesirable races/nationalities (shades of Nazi German there).

    1. Re:But it wouldn't work anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now now you're a little bit ahead

      First step: track foreigners and tourists
      Second step: mandatory scanning at all hotels, taxis, monuments, tourist attractions, museums, etc
      Third step: since some foreigners might slip through, mandatory checking of _everyone_ at said spots, just in case they are foreigners or not
      Fourth step: mandatory bar codes on _everyone_ to simplify job #3!

      Welcome to the United Jails of America! If you're act service we will let you do labor for your favorite corporation!

    2. Re:But it wouldn't work anyway. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This will completely fail because HUMANS can wander around on their own.

      Also, for some reason they tend object to having barcodes stamped on their foreheads. I don't really understand that one.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on keeping *illegal* immigrants out than tagging and tracking *legal* ones? What the actual fuck?!

    OF course, the real purpose of this proposal is that it's one step closer to tagging and tracking *all of us*.

  23. Won't happen by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    He'll never be president, he has to many skeletons in the closet... ...of cows.

    1. Re:Won't happen by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Beyond that, he's not even going to make it to the main stage in the next debate. He's in 12th place right now. That's why he's turning on the crazy.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  24. Re:Unnecessary by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a minor problem with this plan. The ones who come here illegally? They don't have visas. That's what makes their coming here illegal. If they have a visa, then they came here legally.

    You're completely missing the point. He's addressing the large number of people who legally enter (with a visa), but illegally overstay their visas, this becoming illegal immigrants. The people who illegally enter are a related, but different specific problem.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  25. Re:The above is informative ? by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think people are more upset at the perceived risk of getting a barcode tattoo reminiscent of what they used in concentration camps (yeah, I Godwin'ed the thread), or maybe getting pulled over and shot by a cop for having a broken tail light.

    Such things really does count against visiting the US compared to taking a week on a beach somewhere else.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  26. What has happened to the Republicans? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    One Republican candidate wants to round up 11 million people and ship them away.

    .
    Now another Republican candidate wants to put bar codes on the people to track them.

    Have the Republicans gone insane?

    1. Re:What has happened to the Republicans? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about their sanity (always hard to tell from a distance) but they do seem to want to avoid being elected. Otherwise I'd be hard pressed to explain their statements.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    2. Re:What has happened to the Republicans? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Eh, just think of it as try-outs. You know, some company wants to see whether policy X will fly, but they don't really want to be associated with it, so they flog it out to some branch manager with a hard-on for power. He'll be zealously enthusiastic about it. If it works out, they pay him off with a moderate sum and bring him into the fold; if it doesn't work out, they'll deny any association ("Shocked! I'm shocked at this xenophobic nonsense! This is a country of liberty!").

      When there are almost twenty competitors for the Mr. America crown, you'll be willing to do anything to stand out. The minders just sit back and watch how the public reacts to this pageantry; they check which lines are safe to cross in which demographics, and at the end they program the Romney-bot (or, equivalently, the Hillary-bot) to pander optimally to the lowest common denominator without rocking the boat too much.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  27. So, what is he suggesting. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    We all have rfid implants, and set up scanners everywhere? Because how would you know the visitors from the residents unless you track everyone?

    Even if this wasn't a giant affront to rights, how would he even expect to technically implement this?

    Do republicans really go apeshit for this kind of complete fantasy bullshit? So much for "freedom 'murcia." (oh right, freedom only applies to people born here that are christians)

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  28. Re:BS!! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    I thought your title was "B5". I was thinking, "Yeah, but the crew of Babylon 5 could take their com badges off if they did not want to be tracked."

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  29. Re:The above is informative ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's your definition of "peace"? There are always multiple wars going on in numerous places in the world, constantly. Many of these are being interfered with, instigated, or supported by the US and its allies. It's profitable to sell weapons to both sides, to keep the wars going. The only more profitable situation is when you get your puppet installed as leader, then you can just pilfer the public assets wholesale.

    Just because it's peaceful in your little gated neighbourhood, doesn't mean the rest of the world is a-ok.

  30. Re:Unnecessary by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    I don't think you read the post I was replying to at all. I mean, I quoted it and everything:

    prosecute the ones that violate their visas... How many Mexicans do you think would come here illegally

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  31. Deep bench? by Alomex · · Score: 1

    Is that part of the "deep bench" from the GOP?

    Do they mean by deep bench "we can replace any of our lackluster, mediocre candidates by another equally untalented, saying equally thoughtless platitudes, to the delight of the unthinking GOP base"?

  32. Turnabout is fair play? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I know when I travel to Asia, South America, or Europe, I need to present my passport at all hotels I stay at. When I worked in Belgium, Chile and China, I had to register with the Government and provide the local police station with my information - and inform them if I moved to a new apartment/house. In the US, I don't think that tourists need to provide their passports at hotels, nor do visa holders need to register with the local police station. So - how is what is proposed much different than 90% of the rest of the world?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      I know when I travel to Asia, South America, or Europe, I need to present my passport at all hotels I stay at. When I worked in Belgium, Chile and China, I had to register with the Government and provide the local police station with my information - and inform them if I moved to a new apartment/house. In the US, I don't think that tourists need to provide their passports at hotels, nor do visa holders need to register with the local police station. So - how is what is proposed much different than 90% of the rest of the world?

      It may not be terribly different than what you describe, but you're forgetting one thing: The US Government has a bad habit of coloring outside the lines.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      According to the news, so do most countries. The UK, Germany, France, and of course most of Asia all have a record of spying internally on their citizens and legal residents.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I know when I travel to Asia, South America, or Europe, I need to present my passport at all hotels I stay at

      Sounds like you've never travelled to Asia, South America or Europe... Because you only use your passport as a method of ID at hotels. A Hotel needs to know that you are the person you claim to be. I travel to a few places in SE Asia on a regular basis. They know who I am and dont bother asking for ID any more. So much so I've even got a rapport with a few customs officers at Perth. Also, I was also required to present ID at every US hotel I stayed at. The most convenient form is the Passport as they're fairly standard from country to country. I had more than a few US bartenders squint at my Western Australian drivers license for a while before they served me.

      When I worked in Belgium, Chile and China, I had to register with the Government and provide the local police station with my information

      When I travel to the United States, I have to Register with the Electronic System for Travel Authorisation in order to board a flight to the US. No ESTA, no entry. It costs about $4 and there are a variety of middlemen who charge upwards of $20 to do the same thing (so make sure you go to the DHS website). This form asks for a variety of information, not just for ID purposes, but personal questions as well (like "Do you have gonorrhoea") feel free to go through it yourself. At least they've stopped asking if I'm a Nazi.

      Also when I was coming back to the US from South America a few years back I had to provide proof of an outgoing flight and my hotel prior to being permitted to board a flight in Panama.

      I don't think that tourists need to provide their passports at hotels, nor do visa holders need to register with the local police station.

      Next time, stop writing after "think".

      As an Australian traveller, the US is an oddity. There are few places in the world where I need to fill in an application form to visit.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Well the most obvious difference is that a lot of countries around the world are still oppressive regimes. America apparently is different (freedom and justice and all that), although that seems to be changing fast...

    5. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Oh, I lived - and worked - in Belgium and Chile for 2 years each. Had to register with the local police. And when I lived in China (6 years) it was the same thing. Sounds like you've never worked (legally) overseas... Or did you confuse "working in XXX" with "tourist to XXX"?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Oh, I lived - and worked - in Belgium and Chile for 2 years each.

      I know for a fact the Belgium one is a lie. When you get a working visa for the Schengen countries you're automatically registered with the governments of the Eurozone. That's the purpose of getting a visa and you cant work without a visa.

      You dont register with the local police, if the local police need to know anything about you they can look you up.

      Lesson 1 about lying on the internet. Keep your lies believable.

      Now that we've established the Belgium part is a fabrication, I'll wager good money the Chile and China parts are also fabrications. I've got a working visa in Hong Kong, no need to register with the police there. Shortly I'll have one for the UK, done a crapload of research, again no need to register with the police.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Even EU citizens need to register with city hall inside of Belgium. It's also the de-facto standard for foreigners working there. Get your own facts straight before calling someone else a liar.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:Turnabout is fair play? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Now that we've established the Belgium part is a fabrication, I'll wager good money the Chile and China parts are also fabrications. I've got a working visa in Hong Kong, no need to register with the police there. Shortly I'll have one for the UK, done a crapload of research, again no need to register with the police.

      The GP left out the part where he's a registered sex offender. What can he say? He likes to piss on buildings. The fact that it was an elementary school at 10:00AM is all just a big misunderstanding. Is it his fault they site the bar within staggering distance of a school? And he just woke up. And he drank a LOT the night before. Perfectly natural mistake.

      But he has to check in with police everywhere he goes.

  33. Re:There are better ways by sribe · · Score: 1

    Most Countries work much harder at keeping track of people in their Country.

    Really? Try visiting the EU. Your passport will get checked once when you get off the plane. (And once when you get on, but that's really only to make sure that you'll be allowed entry into the US when you land back here.)

  34. will make it to easy to see the HB1 fraud by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    will make it to easy to see the HB1 fraud

  35. Don't worry ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... it's just a little code tattooed on your forearm. Oh, and we'd like you to sew this little gold star on your clothes.

  36. This is Stupid by whistlingtony · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are the top ten leading causes of death in the USA.

    1. Heart disease
    2. Cancer (malignant neoplasms)
    3. Chronic lower respiratory disease
    4. Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases)
    5. Accidents (unintentional injuries)
    6. Alzheimer's disease
    7. Diabetes (diabetes mellitus)
    8. Influenza and pneumonia
    9. Kidney disease (nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis)
    10. Suicide (intentional self-harm).

    I looked. Homicide is 15th. Death By Terrorism isn't on this list. Overdose from drugs bought from drug dealing immigrants isn't either. Just once I wish we'd wage a war on Cancer or Drunk Driving, ya know?

    Also, because it has to be said.... Maybe we can put their tracking bar code on some kind of armband? This shit is !@#$ing stupid and dangerously close to Nazi levels of moron. We have a serious politician blaming the Jews Immigrants and willing to label them. Oh. Come. On!

    The Republican party invited in the stupid and completely has lost it's !@#$ing mind.

    1. Re:This is Stupid by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Just once I wish we'd wage a war on.....Drunk Driving, ya know?

      We do, that's why drunk driving deaths are way down. Right now, there is a campaign to get breath alcohol ignition interlock devices installed in all cars. Do a search for MADD sometime.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:This is Stupid by kqs · · Score: 1

      I agree with all that, especially the Republican Party (of personal liberties fame) losing their mind. But to be fair, we have spent lots of resources on most of that list. Drunk driving is way down due to harsher penalties, stronger enforcement (including lots of checkpoints on holidays), and changing culture. Cancer is very tough but lots of government funding has given us good treatments for a few forms and lots of promising research; same with the other diseases. Accidents; well, you know those nasty toxic chinese products that are recalled on a regular basis? It used to be our factories putting those out and no recalls. We all survived them, but lots of kids from the 40s-80s didn't. A lawsuit culture has lots of problems but a few side benefits.

      Still, I don't think any of those problems have received the continuing media panic and funding bonanza as the wars on drugs and terror. As well as we've done, think about how much better we could be doing with many fewer people working rather than rotting in jail, with better information sharing and liberties, and with money spent on improving the country rather than locking it down and tracking us all.

    3. Re:This is Stupid by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Just once I wish we'd wage a war on Cancer or Drunk Driving, ya know?

      Erm, there has been a war on Drunk Driving... or have you not been paying attention for the last 20+ years? More lives have been destroyed by this war than have been saved, but whatever. Being practical is never the right answer.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  37. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    https://www.hawaii.edu/powerki...

    Deaths from wars and other state violence are at historic lows.

    But really foam at the mouth more.

  38. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    https://www.hawaii.edu/powerki...

    My definition of peace is based on war being a cause of death.

  39. Number Six by alvieboy · · Score: 2

    > Who are you?
    > The new number 2.
    > Who is number 1?
    > You are number 6
    > I am not a number, I am a free man

    I am not 1010010111101010100010111101101000101, I am a free man.

    US problem is not visa attribution - US problem is same problem as everywhere else: too many people, too few jobs, too much lack of education, too many dreams and too many deceptions.

    Labeling people will not only not help, but will make thinks worse.

    The Nazi system labeled jews, you still recall for sure.

    I read an intresting summary today (I am not sure it's accurate though), but it stated that when The Berlin Wall was torn down in 1989 there were other 16 such walls in the world (not necessarly built same way). Nowadays 65 exist, either already in place or being finished. Last one is between Hungary and Serbia, being finished. This is a border line. Not different from the border you see at any international airport.

    Most migrants are not searching for The Ultimate Life, but rather seeking survival.

    Labeling them is to treat them as if they were animals - or even worse! I guess I could more easily get a permit for my Dog than one of those migrants can get a Visa for entering the US.

    And yes, I am somehow revolted, even with my country, due to how it refuses to receive migrants from North Africa.

    Alvie

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Number Six by alvieboy · · Score: 1

      You know what's funny ?

      There's a lot of control over migration and jobs all over the world (even in Schengen - and look at UK position). They do this supposedly to protect their own citizens, to keep wages at an acceptable level, so on. No one is open to let the system self-regulate. And, as odd as it may seem, in EU its the northern countries that oppose to migrants.

      The opposite happens in the finance world: They still believe the system self-regulates, there's absolutely no control over whatever, and we have concrete proof that this system, as it is, is a huge bomb that explodes once in a while. Still, no one wants to change it.

      Rich people can move big money, Poor people can not move themselves, because people seek money (it's all about money - unfortunately you need money to live).

      Alvie

  40. Re:The above is informative ? by phantomfive · · Score: 1
    The number of wars going on in the world has been decreasing for decades, as has the death rate. The world is becoming a peaceful place.

    Many of these are being interfered with, instigated, or supported by the US and its allies

    That's really a US-centric view.......America isn't as powerful as you think it is. People have their own reasons for fighting, and not because they are sheep.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  41. Here we go again. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    The race to the bottom has begun in earnest. We are stupid people and we deserve the stupid politicians we keep electing.

  42. Re:The above is informative ? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Nice link. I found a nice graph to go with it, that you might be interested in. The world is becoming more peaceful.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  43. How about? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whenever a politician suggests something stupid like this then they have to apply it to themselves first to see how it works. Not when it passes, just when they bring the idea out in the public forum.

  44. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    You're comfortable with a certain level of murder in your name, as long as it's less than it was in the past?

    Sure, it beats the heck out of it being more than it was it in the past.

  45. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Thanks, that's a particularly nice presentation.It has the major types all in one image.

  46. Re: The above is informative ? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Depends where you live. Maybe not interfering in the Middle East, South America, Africa and Indo China would've had the same result.

  47. Be careful what you wish for by sjbe · · Score: 2

    "Yet we let people come to this country with visas, and the minute they come in, we lose track of them." He added: "We need to have a system that tracks you from the moment you come in."

    And about 3 nanoseconds later this would be used to track citizens and violate all kinds of civil rights. If we actually aspire to be a free country we have to let people go about their business especially when we have no reasons to suspect them of anything.

  48. Re: The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    https://www.hawaii.edu/powerki...

    Death by communism. Somehow I think if we hadn't been doing things to move the world forward things would have been much worse.

    Really is there any point in history, that you can look at and say the world would be better off if you could have erased America ?

  49. Re:Unnecessary by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    The last thing I want to see is the travesty that is asset forfeiture expanded.

    If it was expanded to immigration you could sue illegally immigrated money and then deport them to mexico.

  50. Re:The above is informative ? by chipschap · · Score: 1

    Interesting how the main anti-US comment was modded +5 and the main pro-US comment modded 0 (as of this writing). I don't know what that tells us about opinions in general but it certainly tells us about /. posters.

  51. Don't know much about history. by westlake · · Score: 1

    There are always multiple wars going on in numerous places in the world, constantly. Many of these are being interfered with, instigated, or supported by the US and its allies.

    I've got news for you, kid.

    It has always been like that and you don't need an imperial power to drive the action, all you need is a sense that you are losing ground against the other.

    What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East, The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror

  52. A system to track everything by ememisya · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to have a system that tracks you from the moment you come in.

    Yea if only we had such a device just about everybody carried around in their pockets with a GPS, camera, microphone, gyroscope, radio etc. Now it would be ideal if only there were handful of giant service providers, so we could work with them to get it done. Naah, who am I kidding? This is America, we have rights, you could never get something like that done.

  53. Re:There are better ways by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    Schengen Area. Doesn't include all of EU, but does also include non-EU countries.

  54. Re:The above is informative ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    The world is enjoying it's longest most peaceful time period since the fall of Rome and idiots get upset over what it took to achieve it.

    Constant wars. That's what it takes to avoid war. War. And lots of it.

  55. Re: The above is informative ? by PatientZero · · Score: 1

    Really is there any point in history, that you can look at and say the world would be better off if you could have erased America ?

    Maybe ask the Native American tribes that question.

    Arguing that today's violence is acceptable because the overall death toll is lower today than yesterday is weak. It's like saying you shouldn't complain about being locked up for no reason because your captors stopped beating you.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  56. Re:SJWs` by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Social Justice Warrior. It's a pejorative for anyone that points out we don't have a perfect society

  57. Re:The above is informative ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    So more threats and less deaths make for an acceptable imperialist invasion? I'd count "war" by the number of countries with uninvited foreign troops on their soil. Civil wars, unless proxy wars, aren't "war" in the traditional sense, and your statistics are heavily skewed by a few internal actions (Soviet Union and China coming to mind, and if Germany hadn't invaded Poland, "war" wouldn't be related to the holocaust deaths). It's a good thing government murder is down, but that isn't war. You are using the wrong statistics, because they support your opinion, rather than finding something that best describes reality, and forming your opinion based of reality.

  58. Package != Person by Macdude · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will be until someone explains to Chris Christie that there is a fundamental difference between a inanimate package an an animate person. Secondly I wonder how long it will take the Governor to understand them...

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  59. No touists in New Jersey? by ukoda · · Score: 1

    I guess tourism not big money in New Jersey or else he wouldn’t say something so stupid. I know people who bypass the USA now because the airport experience is so bad compared with the rest of the world, this would step that whole avoidance of the USA another magnitude.

  60. Re:Unnecessary by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Better would be to put the people that hire them in jail. If there was no job for illegals then there would be only a fraction of them here. As long as you have a demand for what's damn near slave labor then desperate people will find a way to get here. Kill the demand by jailing illegal employers.

  61. Doh by jppiiroinen · · Score: 2

    Somebody should tell Chris Christie that it might not be a good idea to downgrade from GPS tracking of the smart phone devices or from the malware which jumps over air.

    I think that it is a bit naive to believe that you would not be tracked 24/7 already, it should not take a rocket scientist to create a software, when you have the unlimited federal funding (backed by the floating currency). All in all, I personally don't care if somebody wants to track me online or offline, it is their problem, and more likely if that gives someone their daily allowance for food and gadgets, so be it.

    In general, going public and saying that we got your back and we track all the bad people and all the good people, is only going to hurt the good, and as long as people have faith that "no-one" knows what they are doing we are safe.

    I think that the best idea ever would be that all immigrants would receive a smart phone with GPS chip for free for the duration of their visit, if they dont already own one. Then they would need to return the device when they leave the country. Then also those who don't have the iPhone or Android device, would be covered. And if you would want to be more efficient, you would provide them with prepaid visa or mastercard, which would then give you the "full profile" of their behaviour (more or less).

    But what really makes me worried is that if they would treat you, like the FedEx treats their packages.

  62. Re:What a dumb idea! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    You just require a passport for all internal travel. Worked for the USSR. They kept good track of foreigners.

  63. I propose... by drunk_punk · · Score: 1

    We track all politicians like we track cattle in the west. A large brand and a tag through the ear.

  64. Re:The above is informative ? by pepty · · Score: 1

    Lets track the jobs instead. Next time you apply for a job, you first go to a govt office have to have your I-9 updated to include your biometric data (fingerprint or iris scan: your pick). The biometric data kept will not be enough to uniquely identify you, just good enough so that subsequent fingerprint/iris scans have a false positive rate of ~1% of identifying someone else as you and a false negative rate of less than 0.01% (chance of not identifying you as you.)

    Now: apply for your job. State your name and address and get your iris scanned. The employer's scanner encrypts the info and sends it off to the feds. The Feds match you correctly (99.99% of the time), sends back your taxpayer ID and starts the correct W2 or 1099 paperwork for your employer. The employer checks that you gave the correct taxpayer ID and hires you. The Feds can subsidize cell phone sized scanners that work on current cell phone networks, so if folks can send a text they can check whether farmworkers or babysitters are eligible on the spot and within seconds.

    Sure, it could be hacked and people would still be hired under the table. But so long as the penalties for hacking or hiring under the table are steep enough most employers won't want to mess with it.

    I remember telling a law student this idea and she said that it was awesome. Then I emphasized that it wasn't just for immigrant labor: for it to be useful it would be for CEOs, lawyers: all jobs. Her expression turned sour and she said it wouldn't work.

  65. I love all the European comments in this thread by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    ... What is happening in the EU right now with immigrants? Hmmm? Its easy to point fingers at the US and say "well that's not good"... but then look at what's happening in your own backyard. Is that good?

    Frankly, we're not going to get through our shared problems here without some political incorrectness.

    REAL nations can and do hold their borders. That's what borders are in part. They're the line in the sand you hold. Now if you don't do that... then so be it. You don't have a country then.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I love all the European comments in this thread by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Then all countries are imaginary, all law is imaginary, fiat currencies are imaginary...

      And that welfare you're collecting on the basis of imaginary money and imaginary law because you crossed an imaginary line... that all collapses.

      Your fucktarded position would lead immediately to total and complete anarchy. And because you're probably too stupid to realize the problem with total instant anarchy, consider that the immediate response to that will be that the people will accept the first authoritarian that stands up in the anarchy and restores order...

      Which could be ANYONE and more likely than not will be someone that wants to be an authoritarian and is comfortable in that role. which means the result of your complete and total idiocy is that you'll probably spend the rest of your sad little life under a fascistic dictatorship which will also likely be very racist because being racist in such environment would stoke INGROUP/OUTGROUP loyalties thus strengthening the cohesion of the dictatorship... and they would probably not be the passive racists that just don't like X... they'd more likely be the oven and poison gas type.

      Here's the problem with you... you don't think anything through. You know NOTHING of human group psychology. You know nothing of politics. You know nothing of sociology.

      You basically are one of the most ignorant people I've met on this forum. And yes, even though you're cowardly hidind behind AC I know exactly who you are because no one on this site shares your opinion besides you. And I question if more than 1 in a million in this world share it either. And before you act the hero on that point, let me point out further that 1 in a million also has a quite a few astounding idiots in it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  66. Tattoo the number for security by Nyder · · Score: 2

    Since stickers & ID cards can be lost, we should probably tattoo the number on the persons forearms.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  67. So you're a moron, then? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Social Security money scarcity is to inhale large numbers of younger workers (this, by the way, is the exact problem Ponzi schemes have and why they were made illegal, and why it's a legitimate comparison

    It's a legit comparison if you're a moron who doesn't know WTF he's talking about. If SS was a Ponzi scheme, the first person on the program would have been a billionaire. The next few thousand people would have been millionaires, and so on until the last to join would be left with nothing.

    None of that is the case. None. Which is why you, sir, are a moron.

    SS is completely self-funded. The "trust fund" was never supposed to be permanent, but the Boomers paying ahead on their earned retirement benefits. Guess where the Boomers will be by the time the trust fund is depleted? Dead.

  68. Re:The above is informative ? by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you subtract the number of wars in which Muslims are involved, the world is nearly totally peaceful. Mod me down if you wish, but look and read and learn first. An easier way would be to name the wars NOT involving Muslims.

    There can be no peace with a religion that insists on converting you or killing you.

  69. Re:The above is informative ? by Nehmo · · Score: 1

    The number of wars going on in the world has been decreasing for decades...

    This is a good place to post The Fallen video link https://vimeo.com/128373915 It's true. We are now in a period of peace. Deaths declined after WWII.

    --
    (||) Nehmo (||)
  70. Scottish, Irish, Germans, and Italians by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

    Love to see Chistie's reaction when his European cousins come for a visit and get their ankle bracelet applied at Newark International.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  71. Ug, SS is not a ponzi scheme by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's a socialist program meant to keep old people who can't work anymore from becoming homeless. The only question you need to answer when you ask yourself "Can we Afford Social Security?" is "Is America too broke to keep old people from being homeless?". I'd like to think my country isn't that broke (or stupid), so long as we put some caps on the number of mansions folks like Dick Cheney and the Koch bros. can have.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  72. Biometrics? by Nehmo · · Score: 1

    There's no technical reason for barcodes or even RFIDs. Facial recognition, gait recognition, or even fingerprints would work. But Christi doesn't need to introduce the idea. It will happen anyway - and not just to immigrants.

    --
    (||) Nehmo (||)
  73. Number tattoos by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I once worked for a guy who had a number tattooed on his arm. There are some still around, though more of their kids and grandkids, and enough living in NYC or New Jersey that you'd think Christie would have more sense.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Number tattoos by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What has Christie ever done to make you think he has any sense at all? He's just a loud-mouthed moron.

  74. Christie's catching up on his TIVO... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    and it's loaded with "Person of Interest".

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  75. Re:Your double standards are showing by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

    H1-B makes it very hard for people to leave a job and go to another one. That is a lot of what keeps wages down since companies can bring in workers and treat them very badly and unless that person can find another company willing to do quite a lot of paperwork very quickly and take over their visa they will get thrown out. As a result they put up with a lot of abuse.

    I want people to have a regular work visa where they are free to work at any company and move around as the market changes.

    I do want to figure out some way to close the loopholes that companies abuse and require they hire american's first. However there are many engineering and scientific fields that are not related to computer science that really do have shortages and it is very hard to bring anyone in since normally all the H1-B vanish in a few hours since computer companies take them all for nearly slave labor.

    We are probably the only first world country that makes it hard for highly skilled people to come in. If you have an actual engineering degree (chemical, mechanical, aerospace etc) that is basically free admittance to canada or any EU country.

    I even know of PhD researchers where they are one of only two people in the world doing research into an area of biotech that US companies care about a LOT and neither of them live in the USA. If we could make it easier to get in for people like that it would help us a great deal.

    --
    Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
  76. You want to track them? by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    Issue them a smartphone and a Facebook account when they enter the country. Problem solved.

  77. Re:There are better ways by retchdog · · Score: 1

    heh, maybe not even that.

    when i landed in Charles de Gaulle airport, almost the entire staff was apparently on strike. there were a few people milling about doing odd jobs, but no one at debarkation. the French arrivals seemed jaded to it, and the rest of us just shuffled, somewhat confused, through a barren airport and wandered into France without so much as a glance.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  78. They did this in the movie Idiocracy.. by toonces33 · · Score: 1

    One would hope that this isn't where Christy is going for ideas.

  79. Re:The above is informative ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    I think people are more upset at the perceived risk of getting a barcode tattoo reminiscent of what they used in concentration camps (yeah, I Godwin'ed the thread),

    So you basically admit that people are "upset" about an imaginary threat that doesn't currently exist, and is unlikely to ever exist?

    ... or maybe getting pulled over and shot by a cop for having a broken tail light. Such things really does count against visiting the US compared to taking a week on a beach somewhere else.

    We're pretty much still in the same place as the last statement - an imaginary threat. People in the US aren't shot by the police for having a broken tail light. That may be the precursor to a more serious issue, such as someone assaulting a police officer and being shot, but it isn't the cause.

    I'm curious, where are these imaginary boogeymen causing you to flee to? Where are these "trouble free" beaches located?

    Does the threat of Godzilla keep you from Japan, or the threat of volcanoes keep you from Italy? Does the threat of deportation keep you from Greece?

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  80. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Civil wars, unless proxy wars, aren't "war"

    The people dying might beg to differ.

  81. Re:The above is informative ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Not all killing is murder. It is legitimate to defend yourself from enemies that want to kill you and others.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  82. Re:The above is informative ? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

    I don't know what that tells us about opinions in general but it certainly tells us about /. posters.

    The most it tells us is about 4 Slashdot posters (3 that modded one post up, and 1 person who modded one post down). Not really enough information to make any sort of judgement about the whole user-base.

  83. Re:The above is informative ? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 3, Informative

    An easier way would be to name the wars NOT involving Muslims.

    Same goes for Americans doesn't it?

  84. Re:The above is informative ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    So the person dying in war says "I'd have been happy, if only it had been a car crash."?

    Your statistics would count police shootings. Are those "wars"?

  85. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    I see you didn't actually read the links.

  86. Re:The above is informative ? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    The Ukraine.

    But that's a bit like "Hitler was a Vegetarian." I actually agree with your position in that I would say it's safe to say the Muslim World is currently in a last ditch fight for relevancy before modern society completely moderates its last grasp on political power (just as Catholicism destabilized much of Europe to maintain control).

    But when nearly half the world is Muslim of course most of the conflicts are going to involve Muslims.

  87. Re:The above is informative ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    No, I did read the links. You obviously didn't understand them. The reason the recent history has been better is that the numbers are heavily skewed with a few World Wars, and the internal actions of China and Russia. Correct for world wars, and a few "isolated" internal actions, and the deaths you are counting are relatively steady.

  88. Re:The above is informative ? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Come on a current elected US politician is recommended something along the lines of this, http://www.ezidavid.com/FAQ-PI.... So at the airport all that nasty filthy rotten animal foreigners are bent over, their buttocks bared, men, women and children and they have an RFID tag injected into the buttock of the choice. I am sure there are literally hundreds of thousands of Americans who would just love to humiliate and abuse those nasty filthy rotten animal foreigners. This will get airplay overseas and immediately impact tourism to the US because of the immediate negative view this generates of US politicians and the kind of treatment tourists should possible start to expect.

    It is only a matter of time before widly abusive US law enforcement realises what easy prey tourists are because they are desperate not to ruin their holidays, they can be deported on the slightest excuse no matter what US law enforcement has to them and they are very unlikely to hang around to sue. So rather than hanging poor areas to target minorities to fill quotas, it would be far more profitable to hang around tourist traps and target foreigners for cash confiscation (obviously all that money is to buy drugs not spend on food and accommodation), plus failure to carry full ID at pools (immediate arrest, big fine an expulsion), many don't speak English so limited legal access (it is only a matter of time, especially with US politicians attitudes to nasty filthy rotten animal foreigners).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  89. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Seeing as the site was entirely about death caused by governments you must have remarkably low reading comprehension to ask

    So the person dying in war says "I'd have been happy, if only it had been a car crash."?

    Your statistics would count police shootings. Are those "wars"?

  90. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    What does that have to do with the price of tea in China ?

    The OP expresses his hate of America and it's foreign policy as a reason not to visit. This has nothing to do with the topic and seems to be little more than a neurological disorder. The only thing informative about it is it's letting you know he is not particularly sane.

  91. Re:The above is informative ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the guy in the car crash isn't counted in your statistics.. Your complaints about "war" use a broad killing that isn't very well focused on "war". It also counts police shootings. You know, the ones caused by governments (the police are government employees). Do you think that anybody on the planet but you considers a shooting at a traffic stop "war"?

  92. Re:Unnecessary by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    If you wrote a sentence that could be parsed into something intelligible, I'd write a reply.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  93. Already doing it by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    With all the tracking and intelligence collection capabilities US has, no extra effort is needed. Uncle Sam already knows where you go and what you do, if you use any kind of electronic communication or device while in the US (and while outside the US for that matter, for most of us). That, plus airline & hotel & cc usage data tracks the paths of 99% visitors. I guess if you are in the remainign 1% who really "disappear" from the electronic communications after crossing the border, you are automatically a suspect.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  94. Re:The above is informative ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    So you basically admit that people are "upset" about an imaginary threat that doesn't currently exist, and is unlikely to ever exist?

    I knew you were stupid, but I didn't know you were that stupid. Guantanamo Bay is an American concentration camp for abducted muslims and most of them were released after they finally had access to a lawyer after many years of being imprisoned for nothing. The only two differences to Auschwitz are
    1) you don't gas the prisoners yet, just torture them.
    2) it is on Cuban soil, not in Poland.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  95. Re:The above is informative ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    *facepalm*
    No, it is not.
    It is legitimate to defend yourself from enemies that try to kill you. Everything else is a crime.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  96. Re: Europe has a close 2nd by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    If you visit Europe then every hotel you stay in records your passport details and submits them every night

    Even France gave this up in the late '80s.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  97. Re: Europe has a close 2nd by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    (sorry, I forgot to add why -- the police asked the government to stop it as they had no more room to put all the stupid cardbord files).

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  98. Re:The above is informative ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    #Blacklivesmatter

  99. Re:There are better ways by sribe · · Score: 1

    when i landed in Charles de Gaulle airport, almost the entire staff was apparently on strike. there were a few people milling about doing odd jobs, but no one at debarkation. the French arrivals seemed jaded to it, and the rest of us just shuffled, somewhat confused, through a barren airport and wandered into France without so much as a glance.

    When you fly into Marseille, at baggage claim you find a plaque on the wall next to a phone, which translates to "if you have anything to declare, please use this phone to dial extension xxx and request a customs agent". On that trip I returned through Houston, crowded, miserable holding pen with drug-sniffing dogs working the mass of humanity. So what does our paranoia actually get us in terms of a safe society?

  100. Re:The above is informative ? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    (yeah, I Godwin'ed the thread),

    I really wish people would shut up about about this. There's nothing wrong with making references to and comparisons with Nazi Germany, in fact it's a good thing because we need to learn from that experience as a society, and there's countless parallels to be made, and constant vigilance is necessary to make sure we don't repeat this portion of history, as is often done with people who don't bother to learn history. Mr. Godwin himself has said that he never intended to squelch references to the Nazis, he was only making an observation about the trajectory of internet threads.

  101. Re:The above is informative ? by Calydor · · Score: 1

    Actually I wrote that to pre-empt anyone who wanted to call me out on it.

    In my opinion SOME references to Nazis are pretty far out there. Others, like wanting to put barcodes on 'undesirable' people, aren't.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  102. Re:The above is informative ? by Calydor · · Score: 1

    I think people are more upset at the perceived risk of getting a barcode tattoo reminiscent of what they used in concentration camps (yeah, I Godwin'ed the thread),

    So you basically admit that people are "upset" about an imaginary threat that doesn't currently exist, and is unlikely to ever exist?

    I admit nothing. I said 'the perceived risk', I don't take a stance on whether it is likely to happen. The fact is it has a detrimental effect on people's desire to visit the country in the first place.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  103. Re:Dehumanizing People by neminem · · Score: 1

    > "2. It seems to me that the proposals are not for illegal immigrants but for Visa holders. "
    Well, it is true, it's pretty easy to track people who use credit cards... that's why spy shows always stress paying by cash. Oh wait, not that Visa.

  104. Re:Unnecessary by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    If you wrote a sentence that could be parsed into something intelligible, I'd write a reply.

    That would be impossible on this subject. Civil forfeiture is based on the idea that the state sues the money, ie.: "The state vs 1000 dollars in cash", not whoever held the money. There is no way to make that intelligible, and when expanding it to other areas the crazy just spreads. Thus if money is people, then you should be deporting illegally immigrated money.

  105. Re:The above is informative ? by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    I know it's fictional, but the campaign that Paul Atreides used to take command of the galaxy was mostly peaceful, right? I don't remember any Muslims being involved in that one.

  106. I agree with Chris by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Indian Upper caste/Brahmin can infect you with a disease called Caste, a type of Cancer; Cure is http://goo.gl/8nr4bD

  107. Re: The above is informative ? by PatientZero · · Score: 1

    How silly of me. I forgot that past genocides excuse all future genocides.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  108. Christie has no issue with this suggestion, as... by Kevoco · · Score: 1

    ...he is easily identifiable from outer space.

  109. Re:The above is informative ? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Such things really does count against visiting the US compared to taking a week on a beach somewhere else.

    It does, indeed. However, common sense would suggest that less intrusive measures would be applied than barcode tattoos if it ever got to this; in fact, common sense suggests that this sort of thing will never be more than the extreme views of a stupid poitician out to grab attention.

    There are two things in what you say. One is the fact that many would be visitors stay away from America because of the news coming out. That is a real shame - America has a lot of interesting, impressive and beautiful things to see, and Americans are very nice people, in most cases. Unfortunately, there's also this massive, dark side that looms large in people's consciousness; I have, over the years, seem many, worrying stories in European news about people coming to the states as ordinary tourists and having extremely bad experiences. Things like one Danish young family, who did what all Danes do: go to a small restaurant, leaving the pram with their baby right outside the window where they could keep an eye. So, did criminals snatch it? Not at all, the police turned up, the couple ended up having to fight a long, hard battle in court against losing their child 'for neglect'. That is one couple, whose friends and family will never go to the States again. It is such a shame, because you guys could do a lot better.

    The other thing is the question of making people identifiable - to be honest, I wouldn't mind being 'chip-marked' like many pets and horses are now. There are situations where you would definitely like to be identifiable, like if you're found unconscious without ID somewhere. Or perhaps more likely, as a simple convenience; it would be good if I never had to worry about remembering my passport or driving licence. I'm not worried about being monitored - anyone who carries a mobile around is being monitored, and probably hasn't a clue about what is being collected about them. I had a quick look at what is in my phone (Samsung) - something like tens of apps that I have not installed, and which have permission to snoop into everything including using GPS, microphone, camera and networking. If that doesn't worry me, why would I worry about being passively monitored by 'the government' in other ways, by a chip or similar means? At least they don't sell my data to scammers, the way private companies do. I think.

  110. Re:The above is informative ? by dywolf · · Score: 1

    There should be an insanity mod, because your post is in woeful need of it.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  111. Re:The above is informative ? by TopherC · · Score: 1

    The reasonable posts like this are always too late to get moderated. A shame.

  112. Re:The above is informative ? by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Hey look.
    A bigot modded up by four other bigots.

    but look and read and learn first

    No. you. http://www.cfr.org/global/glob...

    And let's not just ignore the US's hand in destabilizing the region and exacerbating the conflicts you're referring to.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.